More likely the real reason people are so shady but at the same time so sure it's not an inside job is probably because more likely there was a coverup of security being so bad that al-qaeda smuggled bombs into the support structures of each building and the administration just didn't want that egg on their face =p

Although you'd think they'd go out and tell people eventually and swallow the embarrassment if they wanted to legitimize taking away their own people's liberties.

All of you idiots voted for Obama too, didn't you?

You're right SillyAss. Who in their right mind would trust an operation of this magnitude to a beer-bonging, blow snorting, frat boy and his 70 year old, quadruple heart attack, Enron fronting, shooting his friend in the face vice president? It's rediculous.

The marching orders were given by an oligarchy of military industrialists. The ones that one of our most beloved presidents, Ike Eisenhower, warned us about as he was leaving office.

McDonald Douglas, Boeing, Raytheon, etc. Anyone who knows anything about criminal conspiricies knows that one path will always lead you to the truth: FOLLOW THE MONEY.

Even though it would enhance Bin Ladin's prestige among his followers to confess, he continues to deny he was involved in 911. The whole point of a terrorist action is to be able to lay claim to it afterward, so the victims know who to fear. You create political capital by creating fear. What's the point in blowing something up and then leaving people to guess who did it? He's not an anarchist, he has an agenda.

It's like kidnapping someone for ransom and then never calling the relatives. Once it hits the news, then any crackpot with a cell phone can call claiming they were the masterminds and steal all your capital. Years of planning and millions of dollars down the drain.

It's not even unprecidented. Consider the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. The following is stolen from it's Wikipedia site...

In October, 2005 the New York Times reported that Robert J. Hanyok, a historian for the U.S. National Security Agency, had concluded that the NSA deliberately distorted the intelligence reports that it had passed on to policy-makers regarding the 4 August incident. He concluded that the motive was not political but was probably to cover up honest intelligence errors.

Hanyok's conclusions were initially published within the NSA in the Winter 2000/Spring 2001 Edition of Cryptologic Quarterly, about five years before they were revealed in the Times article. According to intelligence officials, the view of government historians that the report should become public was rebuffed by policymakers concerned that comparisons might be made to intelligence used to justify the Iraq War that commenced in 2003. Reviewing the NSA's archives, Mr. Hanyok concluded that the NSA had initially misinterpreted North Vietnamese intercepts, believing there was an attack on 4 August. Midlevel NSA officials almost immediately discovered the error, he concluded, but covered it up by altering documents, so as to make it appear the second attack had happened.

On 30 November 2005, the NSA released the first installment of previously classified information regarding the Gulf of Tonkin incident, including Mr. Hanyok's article, "Skunks, Bogies, Silent Hounds, and the Flying Fish: The Gulf of Tonkin Mystery, 2–4 August 1964" Cryptologic Quarterly, Winter 2000/Spring 2001 Edition, Vol. 19, No. 4 / Vol. 20, No. 1. The Hanyok article stated that intelligence information was presented to the Johnson administration "in such a manner as to preclude responsible decisionmakers in the Johnson administration from having the complete and objective narrative of events." Instead, "only information that supported the claim that the communists had attacked the two destroyers was given to Johnson administration officials."

End of stolen material.

Shadow governments within our government using the fears of our leaders to achieve their own ends.

Douglas Adams said it best, if I may paraphrase: The main function of the President is to distract the people from what's really going on.

I thought this was for reviews of the films/videos placed here and not for the sophomoric airings of opinion by someone incapable of making substantiated points and having to rely on insults to make what could weakly be considered and 'argument'. I would venture to guess that the person you accuse of having a limited vocabulary actually has a larger one than yourself. Although I will bow to your superiority of using two-syllable words as you so eloquently demonstrated in the use of the word 'fucking'. You serve your cause well. Keep up the good work!

Besides all of the laws of physics and testimonies that are grotesquely ignored here....
(just like every other conspiracy theory)

You want the real reason why Bush(haha)didn't do this?

The Bush Administration couldn't even get Social Security and Medicare reform together without fucking it up and you numbsculls actually think they'd be able to pull something like THIS off???

I mean... really? You really think that a man
who can't get a two syllable word out of his mouth.... could coordinate something of this magnitude?

The only conspiracy here is the how the hell ol' George made you and your imaginary girlfriend think he was that competent?

actually... I do know how....
because you're all dumber than he is....

believeyourowneyes.com

I have no doubt that our government is involed in the controlled demolition of the twin towers. There are just too many unanswered questions and the answered questions is like they pulled them out of a hat so they could put people at ease. Do people not remember Oklahoma City (and no I dont think Elvis is alive and kickin) But when our government put Tim Mc. to death in just a few short years, they have to be hiding something because we all know that nothing our gov. does happenes that quickly (unless theres money, oil, a evil dictater that has alot of oil, or new laws that benefit our gov. agenda).
Anyway that was a very good article, and keep on looking for the true answers because they are out there! And by the way check out www.pentagonstrike.com it has alot of unanswered questions about a plane that no one really knows much about! Lets all keep looking at the whole picture and not just what our government and media wants us to see!

The architects who built the World Trade center explained why it collapsed the way it did. Also Donald Trump also talked about how the asbestos was removed from the inner beams made it vulnerable.
The producers of this video must be the same ones who made Elvis is still alive.
So you want me to believe that a conspiracy in huge proportions involving hundreds of people did this.
This is a very lame video.

ffff

This "best of" video contains segments from several other public domain, open source videos including Loose Change 2 and 9/11 Revisited. There are also sections not often seen elsewhere. These include an interview with Michael Berger of 911Truth.org on the Scarborough Country TV show, and a real time report from a BBC journalist.

Topics are organized into sections, such as eyewitness reports, evidence of sub-basement explosives, evidence of thermite, and evidence of opportunity to plant explosives (the power-down in the WTC during the weekend prior to 9/11/01).

The video does NOT contain other 9/11 related information, such as an examination of the Pentagon or United Flight 93. It does not discuss or support discredited theories.

Other information about controlled demolitions of 9/11/01 and related topics is at 911TrueStory.com