A Pragmatic Legal Expert System (May 21, 1996)
Author: James Popple
Keywords: SHYSTER; law; legal; expert system; artificial intelligence; jurisprudence
Publisher: Dartmouth Publishing Company
Year: 1996
Language: English
Book contributor: James Popple
Collection: opensource
Notes: Applied Legal Philosophy Series, Dartmouth (Ashgate), Aldershot, May 1996, xviii + 384 pp., ISBN 1 85521 739 2
Description
Most legal expert systems attempt to implement complex models of legal reasoning. This book argues that a complex model is unnecessary. It advocates a simpler, pragmatic approach in which the utility of a legal expert system is evaluated by reference, not to the extent to which it simulates a lawyer's approach to a legal problem, but to the quality of its predictions and of its arguments. The author describes the development of a legal expert system, called SHYSTER, which takes a pragmatic approach to case law. He discusses the testing of SHYSTER in four different and disparate areas of case law, and draws conclusions about the advantages and limitations of this approach to legal expert system development.
Chapter 1 presents a critical analysis of previous work of relevance to the development of legal expert systems. Chapter 2 explains the pragmatic approach that was adopted in the development of SHYSTER. The implementation of SHYSTER is detailed using examples in chapter 3. Chapter 4 describes the testing of SHYSTER, and conclusions are drawn from those tests in chapter 5. Examples of SHYSTER's output are provided in appendices.
Creative Commons license: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
Selected metadata
| Identifier: | APragmaticLegalExpertSystem |
| Mediatype: | texts |
| Licenseurl: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
| Adder: | james@popple.net |
| Rights: | Copyright James Popple 1996 |
![[Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0]](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png "[Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0]")