Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11Short_Story_1_Garthus_
Bookreader Item Preview
- Usage
- Public Domain
This is a work 'Short Story 1' and each individual sentence , written by Gerard Arthus; 9 January 2010. This work was created by Gerard Arthus and is in the Public Domain under the Creative Commons License. I will be producing numerous versions of this short story. All (The entire short story and each indiviidual sentence will be Copyrighted Under the Creative Commons license and will be in the Public Domain. Anyone will be able to use this story or the Sentences therein in whatever way that they choose; included but not limited to incorporation into their own (so-called) creative works. The only restriction is that the derivative work created with this story or sentences therein cannot have in any form, restrictions placed upon its distribution. Hopefully this will highlight the lunacy of modern Copyright rules which are the agents for the destruction of the very things their fellow-traveler lackeys are claiming to promote. That is, modern Copyright Rules stifle Creativity; interfere with the distribution of information, and concentrate power in the hands of the increasing numbers of bureaucrats which inhabit our governments and large multi-national Corporations. They could care less about freedom, free speech, intellectual rights and creativity; their only god is the worship of money and power. I intend to use their own rules to show how stupid and corrupt their actions have been. I have declared the name for this literary style to be Anarcho Stream-of-Thought literature.
Reviews
Reviewer:
Time Traveller
-
favoritefavoritefavoritefavoritefavorite -
January 9, 2010
Subject: Breach of copyright by Oxford Uninversity Press
Subject: Breach of copyright by Oxford Uninversity Press
.
Gerry
I refer you to any standard thesaurus, but I have the Oxford Study Thesaurus (C) 1991 here in front of me.
A lot of its content consists of short example sentences.
I am certain that thesaurus (C) 1991 has breached the copyright of a lot of earlier books, including at least one best seller.
BUT, its highly likely it has also breached the copyright of other publishers' Thesaurus that are (C) 1990 and earlier.
In today's digital age, where a book can be published seconds after being written or even as it is being written, shouldn't copyrights be like (C) 23:32:32H GMT 01/04/2001? That proves the copyright laws are no longer workable.
However, likewise, all Thesaurus and even books published since 1991 are highly likely to be in breach of the Oxford Study Thesaurus (C) 1991 copyright.
All such texts since 1991 must today be taken off the market and compared with the Oxford Study Thesaurus (C) 1991 and breaches reported to the legal department of Oxford University Press immediately, to discuss legal remedies such as compensation.
Likewise the Oxford University Press legal department must immediately take all its current Thesaurus' off the market immediately, and compare with all texts copyrighted before their copyright (Even tens of seconds count legal-wise) and then contact those publishers to discuss legal remedies such as compensation.
Likewise, all publishers of all texts must immediately take all their texts off the market for review, and for their legal departments to begin informing other publishers that their copyrights have been breached.
There has even been legal action because the plot (not sequence of words) of a best seller thriller has been copied.
Likewise, for example, a chemistry text book publisher, is taking extreme risks, legal-wise by stealing the plot from another publishers chemistry text book.
Seems there is more money to be made, by suing for breach of copyright than by creating a book that people want to buy, I mean, a book of gibberish will make a fortune for its author and publisher when next day another author and publisher put out their book of gibberish.
Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise
Hey Gerry, you better take down the one page of text ASAP, its highly likely you have breached a number of copyrights, you dont want the Internet Archive management Tracy and Brewster to get locked up for breaching copyright for distributing your stolen work of art, do you?
Likewise, I am sure I just breached some copyrights above, certainly the phrase "Oxford Study Thesaurus" is under copyright as per "Oxford Study Thesaurus (C) 1991" so I can not use it on the cover of my book of gibberish.
Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise
Hey Internet Archive management Tracy and Brewster, it is certain that a high percentage of the texts on the text archive are breaching copyrights because the copyright laws are outdated and unworkable, in today's digital age, it might be very legal wise to take the archive off-line until the lawyers work it out.
Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise
Hey Gerry, look at what one of my infinite number of monkeys with typewriters just wrote, and what are you going to do about it?
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Short Story 1:
The baby dozed off in Alaska. A whispering barber went to a carnival beneath
a trash can. A glowing man whispered during the Super Bowl. The snappy
student got slapped with a large trout and romance filled the air. The
zookeeper climbed a mountain while on bended knee. In order to illustrate a
point, the woman grinned widely and played scrabble and left. The rugged
senior citizen chatted on a cell phone while going over Niagara Falls in a
barrel. The melancholy salesman struck oil under the light of the silvery moon.
The frowning ham radio operator clucked like a hen. A snooty herd of buffalo
remained silent until a law was passed which banned such behavior. The kind
attorney pounded a gavel against better judgment. A regular herd of buffalo
was fined $500 regularly. The poorly-dressed seamstress jumped into a
moving convertible, and who wouldn't?
Copyright under Creative Commons
Garthus 9 January 2010
#End Short Story 1
Short Story 1:(C) 10th January 2010. All rights reserved. None of the above short story is to be republished, without written permission from Leo the author, except for purposes of critical review, then just one sentence, to which must be attached this copyright notice.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Hey Gerry,
Leo just stuck a copyright on "Garthus" and "Copyright under Creative Commons"
Now Leo is doing what all authors do when their copyright is breached, he has got infinite monkeys with typewriters putting out infinite legal argument to present to judge and jury, he is asking for $1000 every time his copyright is breached, and $50,000 for every use of "Garthus" and "Copyright under Creative Commons" so please inform YOUR legal department to NOT use "Garthus" and "Copyright under Creative Commons" in their legal submissions, otherwise Leo will take legal action on your legal department, for breach of copyright with their legal submissions.
Give up Gerry, you have not got a hope, $50,000 every time you use "Garthus" means Leo will never have to slave in front of a typewriter again.
However, Leo likes you a lot, so he and his heirs will settle for 5 bananas per breach, for every day it continues.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Peter, also known as Lateral Thinker.
LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL
Gerry
I refer you to any standard thesaurus, but I have the Oxford Study Thesaurus (C) 1991 here in front of me.
A lot of its content consists of short example sentences.
I am certain that thesaurus (C) 1991 has breached the copyright of a lot of earlier books, including at least one best seller.
BUT, its highly likely it has also breached the copyright of other publishers' Thesaurus that are (C) 1990 and earlier.
In today's digital age, where a book can be published seconds after being written or even as it is being written, shouldn't copyrights be like (C) 23:32:32H GMT 01/04/2001? That proves the copyright laws are no longer workable.
However, likewise, all Thesaurus and even books published since 1991 are highly likely to be in breach of the Oxford Study Thesaurus (C) 1991 copyright.
All such texts since 1991 must today be taken off the market and compared with the Oxford Study Thesaurus (C) 1991 and breaches reported to the legal department of Oxford University Press immediately, to discuss legal remedies such as compensation.
Likewise the Oxford University Press legal department must immediately take all its current Thesaurus' off the market immediately, and compare with all texts copyrighted before their copyright (Even tens of seconds count legal-wise) and then contact those publishers to discuss legal remedies such as compensation.
Likewise, all publishers of all texts must immediately take all their texts off the market for review, and for their legal departments to begin informing other publishers that their copyrights have been breached.
There has even been legal action because the plot (not sequence of words) of a best seller thriller has been copied.
Likewise, for example, a chemistry text book publisher, is taking extreme risks, legal-wise by stealing the plot from another publishers chemistry text book.
Seems there is more money to be made, by suing for breach of copyright than by creating a book that people want to buy, I mean, a book of gibberish will make a fortune for its author and publisher when next day another author and publisher put out their book of gibberish.
Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise
Hey Gerry, you better take down the one page of text ASAP, its highly likely you have breached a number of copyrights, you dont want the Internet Archive management Tracy and Brewster to get locked up for breaching copyright for distributing your stolen work of art, do you?
Likewise, I am sure I just breached some copyrights above, certainly the phrase "Oxford Study Thesaurus" is under copyright as per "Oxford Study Thesaurus (C) 1991" so I can not use it on the cover of my book of gibberish.
Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise
Hey Internet Archive management Tracy and Brewster, it is certain that a high percentage of the texts on the text archive are breaching copyrights because the copyright laws are outdated and unworkable, in today's digital age, it might be very legal wise to take the archive off-line until the lawyers work it out.
Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise-Likewise
Hey Gerry, look at what one of my infinite number of monkeys with typewriters just wrote, and what are you going to do about it?
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Short Story 1:
The baby dozed off in Alaska. A whispering barber went to a carnival beneath
a trash can. A glowing man whispered during the Super Bowl. The snappy
student got slapped with a large trout and romance filled the air. The
zookeeper climbed a mountain while on bended knee. In order to illustrate a
point, the woman grinned widely and played scrabble and left. The rugged
senior citizen chatted on a cell phone while going over Niagara Falls in a
barrel. The melancholy salesman struck oil under the light of the silvery moon.
The frowning ham radio operator clucked like a hen. A snooty herd of buffalo
remained silent until a law was passed which banned such behavior. The kind
attorney pounded a gavel against better judgment. A regular herd of buffalo
was fined $500 regularly. The poorly-dressed seamstress jumped into a
moving convertible, and who wouldn't?
Copyright under Creative Commons
Garthus 9 January 2010
#End Short Story 1
Short Story 1:(C) 10th January 2010. All rights reserved. None of the above short story is to be republished, without written permission from Leo the author, except for purposes of critical review, then just one sentence, to which must be attached this copyright notice.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Hey Gerry,
Leo just stuck a copyright on "Garthus" and "Copyright under Creative Commons"
Now Leo is doing what all authors do when their copyright is breached, he has got infinite monkeys with typewriters putting out infinite legal argument to present to judge and jury, he is asking for $1000 every time his copyright is breached, and $50,000 for every use of "Garthus" and "Copyright under Creative Commons" so please inform YOUR legal department to NOT use "Garthus" and "Copyright under Creative Commons" in their legal submissions, otherwise Leo will take legal action on your legal department, for breach of copyright with their legal submissions.
Give up Gerry, you have not got a hope, $50,000 every time you use "Garthus" means Leo will never have to slave in front of a typewriter again.
However, Leo likes you a lot, so he and his heirs will settle for 5 bananas per breach, for every day it continues.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Peter, also known as Lateral Thinker.
LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL-LoL
289 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Gerard Arthus - Philosophical Writings Collection
Gerard Arthus - Books and Items 
Additional Collections 
Log In Required 
Deemphasized Collections 
Uploaded by garthus1 on
