We present evidence that the majority of rapidly-, well-localized gamma-ray bursts with undetected, or dark, optical afterglows, or `dark bursts' for short, are most likely the result of extinction by dust in the circumburst medium. First, we show that the dark bursts cannot be explained by a failure to image deeply enough quickly enough: We fit a variety of brightness distribution models to the optical data, and find that approx. 57(+13,-11)% of all bursts, and approx. 82(+22,-17)% of dark bursts, have afterglows that are fainter than R = 24 mag 18 hours after the burst. Secondly, we show that dark bursts tend to be X-ray and radio faint. Thirdly, we show that these correlations, and more specifically the optical vs. X-ray and optical vs. radio distributions, can be explained within the framework of the relativistic fireball model if the dark bursts are extinguished by circumburst dust, and the density of the circumburst medium spans many orders of magnitude, from densities that are typical of the Galactic disk to densities that are typical of dense clouds. Finally, we show that Galactic extinction, host galaxy extinction unrelated to the circumburst medium, and the following high redshift effects - Lyman limit absorption in the source frame, absorption by the Ly-alpha forest, absorption by excited molecular hydrogen in the circumburst medium, and source-frame extinction by the FUV component of the extinction curve - might contribute to the number of dark bursts, but only in small numbers.

plus-circle Add Review

comment

Reviews