Reviewer:
Mycos
-
favorite -
September 26, 2006
Subject:
LIES FROM BOTH ENDS NOW
He claims that in the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11,so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?
These were not steel from high-rises. They were uniquely constructed /skyscraper/. This question (taken from a website of his)also leaves out the issue of damage, thereby showing a clear intent to mislead already in 1 question.
2 # The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is this possible?
The BBC is God now?
3 # Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?
They also say a 707 and a 767 are comparable aircraft. 707 is 125ft nose to tail. 767 is 210 ft. The maximum takeoff weight off a 707 is 330,000 lbs, a 767 is 450,000 lbs. A 120,000 lb, 60 TON LIE!
# Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700°F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800°F under optimal conditions,
A LIE. Depending on what other fuel or energy sources are available, that can change dramatically. Simple Oxygen changes this figure dramatically.
and UL certified the steel used to 2,000°F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?
This sidesteps the certification of the steel used as being only under the conditions of complete structural integrity with accompanying fireproofing. Why omit this?
BECAUSE YOU ARE BEING DECEIVED BY MORE DECEIVERS WITH THEIR OWN AGENDA.
A religious takeover of secular democracy.
I could go on and on but I tire so swiftly of willful stupidity because it meets ones own hate for Bush, For the Left, For the right, For Science, For religion, whatever it is that drives ignorance these days
# Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible?
# Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this possible?
# Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. How is this possible?
# A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93,which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered overran area of about eight square miles. How is this possible?
# A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible?
# The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this possible?
Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints.
These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality."