How old are fossils?
Bookreader Item Preview
Share or Embed This Item
texts
How old are fossils?
- Publication date
- 1927
- Topics
- Paleontology, Fossils, Fossielen, Datering
- Publisher
- Chicago : Field Museum Press
- Collection
- fieldmuseumlibrary-texts; fieldiana; biodiversity; americana
- Contributor
- Field Museum of Natural History Library
- Language
- English
- Volume
- Fieldiana, Popular series, Geology, no. 9
Includes bibliographical references (p. [12]/[152])
Fieldiana, Popular series, Geology, was published by Field Museum of Natural History, Dept. of Geology as Leaflet (no. 1-4, 1922-1923) and as Geology leaflet (no. 5-14, 1925-1933). The Leaflet series was renamed the Popular series when published by Chicago Natural History Museum for Anthropology, Botany, and Zoology (1947-1959)
Fieldiana, Popular series, Geology, was published by Field Museum of Natural History, Dept. of Geology as Leaflet (no. 1-4, 1922-1923) and as Geology leaflet (no. 5-14, 1925-1933). The Leaflet series was renamed the Popular series when published by Chicago Natural History Museum for Anthropology, Botany, and Zoology (1947-1959)
- Addeddate
- 2007-12-04 01:32:04
- Associated-names
- Field Museum of Natural History. Dept. of Geology
- Camera
- 5D
- External-identifier
- urn:oclc:record:1046591416
- Foldoutcount
- 0
- Identifier
- howoldarefossils09kroys
- Identifier-ark
- ark:/13960/t0gt5jj9f
- Lcamid
- null
- Ocr_converted
- abbyy-to-hocr 1.1.37
- Ocr_module_version
- 0.0.21
- Openlibrary_edition
- OL7039268M
- Openlibrary_work
- OL16328962W
- Page_number_confidence
- 38
- Page_number_module_version
- 1.0.3
- Pages
- 28
- Possible copyright status
- In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder.
- Ppi
- 400
- Rcamid
- null
- Scandate
- 20071217203408
- Scanner
- illi2
- Scanningcenter
- ill
- Worldcat (source edition)
- 17783160
- Year
- 1927
- Full catalog record
- MARCXML
This book is available with additional data at Biodiversity Heritage Library.
comment
Reviews
Reviewer:
Apeism is Stupid
-
favorite -
May 13, 2014
Subject: The Age of the Fossils is...
Subject: The Age of the Fossils is...
Since the Genesis Flood caused the quick burial of life on the earth so that they could be preserved and fossilized, that would mean, the age of the fossils are about 4400 years old
MILLIONS of years of slow burial will never fossilize and preserve dead animals. Before any animal is buried through millions of years of slow burial, a dead animal would be devoured by parasites and predators, and its bones scattered. This is not what is found with most fossils. OBSERVATION proves a very quick burial happened. Just look at the Archaeopteryx fossil... it's well preserved, showing quick burial. Even science web sites admit, that quick burial is required for a creature to be preserved. This goes against evolution. Fossilized closed clams, fossilized soft-bodied creatures, and fossilized polystrate trees, are strong evidences for the Genesis Flood, and debunks the evolution time-line of millions of years. The continuing problem of having NO transitional fossils is also a problem for evolution. Evolution is debunked, because of the ABSENCE of transitional fossils. There are evolutionary scientists, like Stephen J. Gould, Niles Eldredge, and Colin Patterson, whom have admitted, the transitional fossils don't exist. Like... where are those fossils that link a reptile to the Archaeopteryx? OR, where are those fossils that link a land animal with a whale? They don't exist. Evolutionists have got to stop using Star Trek as proof for evolution! Drawings, computer graphics and animation, plastered facsimiles, graphs, charts, and empty words, don't prove evolution, one iota.
MILLIONS of years of slow burial will never fossilize and preserve dead animals. Before any animal is buried through millions of years of slow burial, a dead animal would be devoured by parasites and predators, and its bones scattered. This is not what is found with most fossils. OBSERVATION proves a very quick burial happened. Just look at the Archaeopteryx fossil... it's well preserved, showing quick burial. Even science web sites admit, that quick burial is required for a creature to be preserved. This goes against evolution. Fossilized closed clams, fossilized soft-bodied creatures, and fossilized polystrate trees, are strong evidences for the Genesis Flood, and debunks the evolution time-line of millions of years. The continuing problem of having NO transitional fossils is also a problem for evolution. Evolution is debunked, because of the ABSENCE of transitional fossils. There are evolutionary scientists, like Stephen J. Gould, Niles Eldredge, and Colin Patterson, whom have admitted, the transitional fossils don't exist. Like... where are those fossils that link a reptile to the Archaeopteryx? OR, where are those fossils that link a land animal with a whale? They don't exist. Evolutionists have got to stop using Star Trek as proof for evolution! Drawings, computer graphics and animation, plastered facsimiles, graphs, charts, and empty words, don't prove evolution, one iota.
1,354 Views
2 Favorites
DOWNLOAD OPTIONS
For users with print-disabilities
IN COLLECTIONS
The Field Museum of Natural History Library - Texts Fieldiana Biodiversity Heritage Library American LibrariesUploaded by Unknown on