|
|
|
| Anonymous User (login or join us) | Upload |
Music for quantum networks and sunset beaches.
This audio is part of the collection: Panospria
It also belongs to collections: netlabels; netlabels
Artist/Composer: Shane Turner
Date: 2007-06-08
Keywords: IDM; Ambient; Experimental
| Audio Files | 256Kbps MP3 |
| Katana | 7.32 MB |
| Daybreakfastballadvertigo | 8.47 MB |
| Band.Montreal.Noise | 10 MB |
| Hazy (Rmx) | 30 MB |
| Up.Convex.Down.Concave.Pass | 4.00 MB |
| Net.Dance[:-)]; | 21 MB |
| Chocobrain | 12 MB |
| Image Files | JPEG |
| pan026.jpg | 43 KB |
| pan026sm.jpg | 12 KB |
| Information | Format | Size |
| pan026_files.xml | Metadata | 3.69 KB |
| pan026_meta.xml | Metadata | 815 B |
| pan026_reviews.xml | Metadata | 2.40 KB |
| Other Files | Unknown |
| pan026_rules.conf | 7 B |
![[2.0 out of 5 stars] [2.0 out of 5 stars]](/images/star.png)




Reviewer: watsonic - ![[4.0 out of 5 stars] [4.0 out of 5 stars]](/images/star.png)



- January 30, 2010
Subject: ok actually this is pretty good ...
not affiliated with the artist or label at all, but as someone who has been listening to electronic music for half a lifetime (15 years), i can say this is pretty high quality stuff for something of experimental nature.
it is definitely experimental and noisy, but its more coherent and interesting than alot of noise type material i've heard. well thought out and mastered...
sure i bet the downloads are manipulated. but in light of that i'm pleasantly surprised. in fact i made a login on archive to tell you all...
Reviewer: LauraBradford - ![[1.0 out of 5 stars] [1.0 out of 5 stars]](/images/star.png)



- October 15, 2009
Subject: oh well
yeah, i don't think that many people download this.
Reviewer: noseyo - ![[3.0 out of 5 stars] [3.0 out of 5 stars]](/images/star.png)



- November 1, 2007
Subject: i like
i like this work, is closer and with interesing explorations, but the number of downloads is a little weird. Good Job indeed.
Reviewer: enkeling.nl - - September 9, 2007
Subject: is this right?
of course this music might be wildly popular, but it seems the numbers might have been manipulated, which would be a disgrace.
Reviewer: sjoseph - ![[1.0 out of 5 stars] [1.0 out of 5 stars]](/images/star.png)



- August 27, 2007
Subject: ummmmm....yeah
hmmmmm...77,000 downloads? no reviews? streaming now, and I gotta admit, I'm as open to all form of music as anyone, but I don't see why anyone would want this. Enlighten me.