(logo)
(navigation image)
Home Audio Books & Poetry | Computers & Technology | Grateful Dead | Live Music Archive | Music & Arts | Netlabels | News & Public Affairs | Non-English Audio | Open Source Audio | Podcasts | Radio Programs | Spirituality & Religion | AcousticPlanet

Search: Advanced Search

UploadAnonymous User (login or join us) 

Listen to audio

[item image]
Run time: 4:50

Stream (help[help])

VBR M3U (Hi-Fi)
64Kbps M3U (Lo-Fi)

Play / Download (help[help])

(2.3 MB)64Kbps MP3 ZIP
(3.8 MB)Flac ZIP
(4.6 MB)VBR ZIP


All Files: HTTP

Resources

Bookmark
Report errors

Paul Whiteman and George GershwinRhapsody In Blue Part 2 (1924)

This is the closest we can get to the original performance, it was fresh in the minds of all the performers and was not like any other record ever made afterwards, enjoy this most unique recording and historic audio document.
2 parts


This audio is part of the collection: 78 RPMs & Cylinder Recordings

Author: Paul Whiteman and George Gershwin
Date: 1924-00-00
Source: http://www.edisonnj.org/menlopark
Recorded by: Menlo Park


Notes

Digital recording from Victor Talking Machine disc made at Menlo Park.
To find out more visit Menlo Park

Individual Files

Whole ItemFormatSize
rhapblue21924_64kb.m3u64Kbps M3UStream
rhapblue21924_64kb_mp3.zip64Kbps MP3 ZIP2.3 MB
rhapblue21924_flac.zipFlac ZIP3.8 MB
rhapblue21924_vbr.m3uVBR M3UStream
rhapblue21924_vbr_mp3.zipVBR ZIP4.6 MB
Audio FilesFlacOgg Vorbis64Kbps MP3VBR MP3
Rhapsody In Blue Part 23.8 MB1.4 MB2.3 MB4.6 MB
InformationFormatSize
rhapblue21924_files.xmlMetadata5.0 KB
rhapblue21924_meta.xmlMetadata1.1 KB
rhapblue21924_reviews.xmlMetadata3.3 KB

Write a review
Downloaded 10,220 times
Reviews
Average Rating: [5.0 out of 5 stars]

Reviewer: rayhorton - [5.0 out of 5 stars] - August 23, 2008
Subject: 1927 recording can be heard at:
until someone takes it down, anyway. This 1924 recording is fantastic! Tempos are faster than most do, nowadays, but not as fast as Gershwin's piano roll. I absolutely love all the character that the Whiteman players put into the piece.

Ray Horton
Bass Trombonist,
Louisville Orchestra

Reviewer: dentext - [5.0 out of 5 stars] - March 9, 2007
Subject: this version is the best text, even with cuts
Lyle Skinner was a pianist for Paul Whitman for about 20 years, then he taught at Waco High and Baylor in texas. He was my father's teacher, mentor, and musical companion in my dads' youth.
They cut a huge stack of 78's together in the back of the music shop. The version of rhapsody that my father kept was cut in the late 50's by the 'berlin philharmonic' and the cues are closer to this primary version than any other i'd heard, though the orchestration is contemporary. I have an old worn piece of vinyl, this has the soul to it. Nobody can get this piece just right.

Reviewer: B. Stockwell - [5.0 out of 5 stars] - March 7, 2006
Subject: That's Gershwin at the keyboard, by the way . . .
This, like Part 1 of this recording, is an edited performance, with cuts made to fit the 15-minute work onto two 78-RPM discs. Total time is under 9 minutes, but the cuts are pretty smart ones. This work was originally written for a large dance band, the way you hear it here. This isn't "Symphonic Jazz." It's authentic 1920's style - completely different from the bloated "violins and cellos" versions that we're used to hearing. You can hear the banjos in this version. Gershwin plays the piano part and the performance is fast fast fast. The opening clarinet glissando wails and breaks off into reedy laughter. This is SO different from the the syrupy swooning you now hear. The sound isn't spectacular - the microphone wasn't invented until the next year, 1925 - but these 78s are still pretty well transfered. The recording of "Rhapsody in Blue" was a hit. In 1927 the same group - again with Gershwin but now with a microphone - made another recording. Paul Whiteman had a quarrel of some sort and walked out of the recording session. They recorded anyway, with another conductor - Nathaniel Shilkret, I think - taking over. Whiteman was happy to promote the recording as his own, nonetheless. The electric version is better recorded but it lacks, well, electricity. Everyone, including Gershwin, just punches it harder in 1924.


Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)