2008
United Nations
__List of Protected Areas

GawCcrA IUCN

Neo / ON PROTECTED AREAS The World Conservation Union

Front and back cover photo key
Earth map courtesy of ESRI © 2002

Air and Ténéré Natural Reserves
and World Heritage Area, Niger
IUCN Management Category IV
© Chris Magin

Yosemite National
Park and World
Heritage Area, USA
IUCN Management
Category II
© Stuart Chape

Ningaloo Marine Park,
Western Australia

© Stuart Chape

IUCN Management Category V

Ravilevu Nature Reserve, Fiji
IUCN Management Category Ia
© Stuart Chape

Los Glaciares National
Park and World Heritage
Area, Argentina
IUCN Management
Category II
© Chris Magin

Nakai-Nam Theun
National Conservation Area,
Lao PDR
IUCN Management
Category VI
© Stuart Chape

Simien Mountains National Park
and World Heritage Area,
Ethiopia
IUCN Management Category II
© Chris Magin

Abisko National Park, Sweden
IUCN Management Category II
© Stuart Chape

2003
United Nations
List of Protected Areas

Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2010 with funding from
UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge

http://www.archive.org/details/2003unitednationO3chap

2003
United Nations
List of Protected Areas

Compiled by
Stuart Chape, Simon Blyth, Lucy Fish,
Phillip Fox and Mark Spalding

IUCN - The World Conservation Union
UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre
2003

The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do
not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, UNEP-WCMC or
other participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area,
or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

UNEP-WCMC or its collaborators have obtained the Data Set from documented sources
believed to be reliable and have made all reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the Data
Set. UNEP-WCMC does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of the Data Set and excludes
all conditions, warranties, undertakings and terms express or implied whether by statute,
common law, trade usage, course of dealings or otherwise (including but not limited to the
fitness of the Data Set for its intended use) to the fullest extent permitted by law.

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or UNEP-
WCMC.

Published by: TUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and UNEP World
Conservation Soe Centre, Cambridge, UK

IUCN @ ©

The World Conservation Union UNEP WCMC

Copyright: ©2003 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural
Resources
©2003 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre

Reproduction of this publication, or excerpts from it, for educational or other
non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission
from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.

Reproduction of this publication, or excerpts from it, for resale or other
commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the
copyright holder. This prohibition applies equally to any versions or com-
ponents of the publication in electronic media such as CDs, DVDs or
Internet editions.

Citation: Chape, S., S. Blyth, L. Fish, P. Fox and M. Spalding (compilers) (2003).
2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas. \UCN, Gland, Switzerland and
Cambridge, UK and UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK. ix + 44pp.

ISBN: 2-8317-0746-3
92-807-2362-6

Cover design by: McHale Ward Associates, Hertfordshire, UK

Layout by: IUCN Publications Services Unit, UK
Produced by: IUCN Publications Services Unit, UK
Printed by: Thanet Press Ltd, UK

Available from: IUCN Publications Services Unit
219c Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 ODL, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 1223 277894, Fax: +44 1223 277175
E-mail: info@books.iucn.org
www.iucn.org/bookstore
A catalogue of IUCN publications is also available

The text of this book is printed on 115gsm Fineblade Extra made from low chlorine pulp

Contents

Foreword

Acknowledgements

Us

Introduction

Format and content of the 2003 UN List of Protected Areas
History of the United Nations List process

Reinforcing the importance of the UN List process

The World Database on Protected Areas
Compilation of the 2003 UN List of Protected Areas
Derivation of 2003 data

Criteria for inclusion

Aspects of data presentation
Application of the IUCN Protected Area Management Categories

Layout of the 2003 UN List
Country summaries

National sites
International sites

5. Information gaps and limitations and explanatory notes

6. Analysis of global protected area trends

7.

Number and extent of the world’s protected areas
Growth of the world’s protected areas

Coastal and marine protected areas

Extent and protection of the world’s terrestrial biomes
Analysis by regions

Note on the WCPA Antarctic region

Updating the World Database on Protected Areas

Annex. Protected Area Number and Extent by IUCN WCPA Region
Tables

Table 1. Global number and extent of protected areas
Table 2. Indicative ranking of 1997 and 2003 proportional percentage values

by IUCN Category (excluding non-categorised sites)

Table 3. Protected areas in World Parks Congress years

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Neen

Table 4. Extent of protection of the world’s major terrestrial biomes 29
Table 5. Predominant categories in IUCN WCPA regions by area 3]
Figures

Figure 1. Global protected area number and extent 2003 23
Figure 2. Global number and area of protected areas by size class 24
Figure 3. Global number of protected areas by IUCN category and size class 24
Figure 4. Global area of protected areas by IUCN category and size class 24
Figure 5 Cumulative growth in protected areas by 5-year increment: 1872-2003 26
Figure 6. Cumulative growth in global number of protected areas: 1997 to 2003 Pay
Figure 7. Cumulative growth in global area of protected areas: 1997 to 2003 27

vi

Foreword

The United Nations Environment Programme and IUCN — The World Conservation Union are
pleased to present the 2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas. This is the thirteenth report
to be produced since 1962 that records the global community’s endeavour to conserve the
Earth’s natural places. The growth in area and extent of the conservation estate in the 20"
century, especially in the last quarter of the century, reflects an increasing political com-
mitment to conserving the Earth’s remaining biological diversity. The growth in the global
protected areas network, with diverse management objectives, also reflects the high social and
cultural values that societies place on them. The 2003 UN List is an essential reference
document for all who want to understand the progress made in responding to the challenges of
biodiversity loss and other environmental threats around the world.

As we enter the new millennium there is compelling statistical evidence presented in the
2003 UN List that concrete action has been taken by governments, organisations and in-
dividuals to set aside not only discrete areas for protection but also protected area systems and
networks. These are essential if we are to implement the ecosystem approach to the way we
manage the planet’s resources. Of course, statistics are only part of the story. Protected areas in
most countries urgently need technical and financial resources to ensure that they are ef-
fectively managed to achieve their objectives.

The 2003 UN List is the first version to attempt a comprehensive presentation of all the
world’s known protected areas. The global conservation estate has grown enormously since
the first UN List was published in 1962 with just over 1,000 protected areas. This edition lists
102,102 sites covering 18.8 million km’. Significant progress has been made in conserving
representative areas of the world’s terrestrial biomes, although some biomes, including Lake
Systems and Temperate Grasslands, remain poorly represented. Of the total area protected it is
estimated that 17.1 million km” constitute terrestrial protected areas, or 11.5% of the global
land surface. Unfortunately, marine areas are significantly under-represented in the global
protected area system. Approximately 1.7 million km’ comprise marine protected areas - an
estimated 0.5% of the world’s oceans and less than one-tenth of the overall extent of protected
areas worldwide.

An important aspect of the UN List process is that it is produced through a partnership
between IUCN, the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), UNEP and the
UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre. The UN, IUCN and the Commission have
been working in partnership for the past 44 years. It is also pleasing to see the valuable
contributory role of more recent partners in the UN List process, including the European
Environment Agency, the ASEAN Regional Centre for Biodiversity Conservation, and the
numerous organisations comprising the World Database on Protected Areas Consortium.

The work of WCPA in developing and refining international protected area definitions and
management objectives has been central to the development of the UN List. This is the second
edition to use the six IUCN management categories adopted in 1994. It provides an excellent
internationally understood framework within which countries can structure their protected
area systems. Already, there is considerable diversity evident in the application of the system
throughout the world, reflected in the regional analyses presented in this edition. For example,
the growing application of Category VI (Managed Resource Protected Areas), in many
countries suggests an increasingly close link between protection and sustainable use.

Vii

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Finally, publication of the 2003 UN List coincides with the V" World Parks Congress to be
held in Durban, South Africa. The UN List will provide invaluable input to the deliberations of
the Congress. However, the relevance of the UN List is dependent upon the review of its
information and continuing input by those who plan, establish and manage the world’s
protected areas — our key partners — to ensure that information is up-to-date. We therefore urge
you to review this document and the accompanying data critically and provide UNEP-WCMC
with new or updated information.

iw fs

Klaus Topfer Achim Steiner

Executive Director, UNEP Director General, IUCN
An trthors ae a

Mark Collins Kenton Miller

Director, UNEP-WCMC Chair, IUCN World Commission

on Protected Areas

Vill

Acknowledgements

The generous assistance provided by national and international agencies to the 2003 United
Nations List of Protected Areas process is gratefully acknowledged. Many professionals from
protected areas management agencies around the world and other experts have provided the
information used in updating the World Database on Protected Areas, which underpins the
2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas. Without their invaluable input, this edition of the
UN List could not have been completed.

The support of Kenton Miller, Chair of the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas,
and Commission Vice Chairs and members has once again been an essential component of the
UN List process. Similarly, the support and guidance of David Sheppard, Pedro Rosabal and
Peter Shadie have contributed substantially to the success of the process.

The European Environment Agency and the European Topic Centre on Nature Protection &
Biodiversity (ETC/NPB) undertook the survey of European countries, with the generous
assistance of Marc Roekaerts, Lauri Klein and Ulla Pinborg. The ASEAN Regional Centre for
Biodiversity Conservation provided updated information for the ASEAN countries of
Southeast Asia, with the generous support of John MacKinnon and Lewie Dekker.

The cooperation of UNESCO for information on World Heritage and Biosphere Reserve
sites, and the Ramsar Convention Bureau for information on Wetlands of International
Significance is gratefully acknowledged.

Valuable input was also provided by members of the World Database on Protected Areas
(WDPA) Consortium as part of the WDPA updating process. In particular: Roger Sayre and
Leo Sotomayor — The Nature Conservancy; Silvio Olivieri and Mohammad Bakarr —
Conservation International; Neil Burgess, Holly Strand and Jan Schipper— WWF US; Kenton
Miller and Robin White — World Resources Institute; Chris Magin — Fauna & Flora
International; Eric Sanderson and Madhu Rao — Wildlife Conservation Society; Martin Sneary
and Mark Balman — BirdLife International.

A number of other people made significant inputs to the compilation and production of the
UN List, including advice, inputting and cross-checking entries in the database, and re-
searching data sources. Their assistance is greatly appreciated, in particular:

John Ady, Sofi Charlwood, Jerry Harrison, Jargal Jamsranjav, Florence Jean, Igor Lysenko,
Melanie Mason, Corinna Ravilious, Michelle Taylor, Karen Timmins and Gillian Warltier at
UNEP- WCMC; and Carola Borja at Conservation International.

Finally, the data collection, analysis and production of the 2003 United Nations List of
Protected Areas would not be possible without the generous financial support of: UNEP,
IUCN — The World Conservation Union, UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs, The World Bank, European Environment Agency/European Topic Centre on Nature
Protection & Biodiversity (ETC/NPB), International Council for Mining and Metals, BP ple
and BHP-Billiton.

: é
te i Fis
oawgets —
——
4 ae : Pr es i sf oi wi
/ —
a aes pea! T4Y) © I Say leapt
pl Puey it; xi iit S <4 4 y
i - cm F < P. ‘
Vt ee pes) ees. eg.) BS Ses < .
y er 6 AD 5 ae, ee 28 £
‘ = A
Py vk ¢ (fia =A , Ps
A ieynbow wd we 4 (am ae) KO Le ye TN: Wil ri pik
4 ee ae 7) :
y hess mh Mea. ‘ yelp vi) in, VR" 1 ky es wate tii ie
ye ¢4 pale tir eies attache yer gad? Ad
.
LU

A tye wager! bhaeal ¢
Ls " nana se ct Jaeerniben 0) en 5 nee at
~ 5 a =

abl ae som ii ): ‘
. rales oe as 5.10 é a “2 via
Pw iliet S ue aac a) Pilea eevee M5
wr +. goo! IF it toe ce el é j (<- 1

oe = ina yiie para . 7 .) ae Te

1 (uae Lda Ub se ae —— acs nf ty panllire Te
oll aa eg Pier)
fs ee ew 1, age a
eon a sie
iy f —v r
oval Ser yrtigae fib dyec oe ae
Sees ko my Cap eee ‘ares .
ee eee sli eK, oy ‘Maxed od bo,
Mh reer | Wt Alla pena wand
A imcodagrtiial iar’ . ania
eons ARERAD 2

hy a

\<

ui om

1. Introduction

The 2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas presents data on 102,102 protected areas
covering 18.8 million km’. Within this total figure, there are 69,066 protected areas with IUCN
Management Categories. In addition, there are 4,633 internationally designated sites.
Although there has been an increase in the range of data presented in the 2003 UN List,
compared to previous editions, it is clear that there has been a substantial increase in the extent
of the world’s terrestrial conservation estate in the past seven years. However, marine areas
still make up a very small component — 1.7 million km” or 9.1% of the total area protected.

This is the thirteenth edition in a series that was initiated by the United Nations more than 40
years ago. The last edition published data collected in 1997. Of the previous 12 UN Lists
published, five (1982—1997) have been prepared jointly by UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. As well
as changes in the format and content of the 2003 UN List, the process involved to gather and
review the data reflected the widening of partnership arrangements instituted in 2002 to
manage the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) that underpins the UN List. This
partnership includes other organisations through the WDPA Consortium, as well as agree-
ments with intergovernmental organisations, such as the European Environment Agency and
the ASEAN Regional Centre for Biodiversity Conservation. This is also the first UN List
prepared since the World Conservation Monitoring Centre became part of UNEP.

Format and content of the 2003 UN List of Protected Areas

The format and content of the 2003 UN List is a significant departure from the previous
editions that have been produced. As discussed below, production of the UN List has been an
evolving process since its inception in 1962, moving from the iconic national park “role of
honour” concept that characterised the earlier UN Lists to one that reflects the range of
protected area objectives and values relevant to the late 20" and early 21“ century. Although
criteria and definitions for inclusion have changed, both the 1997 and 2003 UN Lists use the
IUCN Protected Areas Category System as the basis for analysis. Globally the numbers of
protected areas have increased substantially, and their conservation values and role in the
provision of ecosystem services and sustainable development have broadened considerably.
The recent (relative to the time period of the UN List) emphasis on ecosystem approaches,
ecological corridors and the function of protected areas as “core” sites within wider landscape
conservation frameworks calls for a more inclusive approach to presenting protected areas in
the UN List.

The 1997 UN List recorded 12,754 sites with IUCN categories published as a report with
more than 400 pages. Clearly, to provide comprehensive information in the 2003 UN List on
the 69,066 protected areas with IUCN categories alone would require a hard copy publication
of 4—5 volumes. A decision has therefore been made to present the data on CD-ROM, included
with this report. The use of this format has also provided an opportunity to provide information
not previously distributed with the UN List.

In all previous editions of the UN List, criteria for inclusion have focused on specific
definitions of protected areas, a minimum size and, since the 1982 edition, the UN List has
only included those sites with IUCN management categories. With respect to these criteria, it
has been decided in this edition to include a// protected areas that meet the IUCN definition of

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

a protected area, regardless of size and whether or not they have been assigned an IUCN
category.

IUCN defines a protected area as:

An area of land and/or sea especially dedicated to the protection and maintenance
of biological diversity, and of natural and associated cultural resources, and
managed through legal or other effective means.

This decision is based on:

ms Notall protected area agencies or other organisations have assigned IUCN categories to
their sites. However, the 33,036 protected areas without IUCN categories cover 3.6
million km* and therefore represent a significant proportion of the global conservation
estate. Their omission would significantly under-represent the efforts that have been
made by many countries to establish protected areas. It should be noted, however, that
their inclusion in no way diminishes the importance placed by IUCN, UNEP, IUCN’s
World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) and UNEP-WCMC upon the assign-
ment of management categories as a mechanism for the rational international assess-
ment of protected areas. On the contrary, inclusion of the non-categorised sites clearly
shows the progress that has been made in assigning categories to most of the world’s
protected areas (67% of the total number and 81% of the area). The value of the category
system reinforces the need to achieve the goal of progressively assigning all relevant
sites to an IUCN category.

m The previous size limitation of a minimum of 10km? (1,000 hectares), or 1km? (100
hectares) in the case of islands, has not been applied. The rationale for this is not only the
opportunity provided by the digital format, but also because even small areas can play a
significant role in conservation — especially in the context of bioregional planning
approaches. The IUCN protected area definition does not include a size restriction.

History of the United Nations List process

The first United Nations List of National Parks and Equivalent Reserves was produced at the
request of the United Nations following a resolution adopted by the General Assembly at its
16" Session in December 1962 on ‘Economic Development and Nature Conservation’. This
resolution endorsed an earlier resolution (No. 713) of the 27th Session of the UN Economic
and Social Council (ECOSOC) held in 1959, which recognised ‘National Parks and
Equivalent Reserves’ as an important factor in the wise use of natural resources, and led to the
compilation of the World List of National Parks and Equivalent Reserves.

The ECOSOC resolution reads as follows:
“The Economic and Social Council,

Noting that national parks and equivalent reserves have been established in most
countries which are Members of the United Nations or the specialized agencies,
and that they contribute to the inspiration, culture and welfare of mankind,

Believing that these national parks are valuable for economic and scientific
reasons and also as areas for the future preservation of fauna and flora and
geologic structures in their natural state,

(1) Requests the Secretary-General to establish, in co-operation with UNESCO, FAO,
and other interested specialized agencies, a list of national parks and equivalent
reserves, with a brief description of each, for consideration by the Council at its

1. Introduction

twenty-ninth session, together with his recommendations for maintaining and
developing the list on a current basis and for its distribution;

(2) Invites State Members of the United Nations and of the specialized agencies to
transmit to the Secretary General a description of the areas they desire to heve
internationally registered as national parks or equivalent reserves; and

(3) Furthermore invites the International Union for Conservation of Nature and
Natural Resources and other interested non-governmental organisations in con-
sultative status to assist the Secretary-General, upon his request, in the preparation
of the proposed list.”

In his introductory statement to the first edition of the UN List, the UN Secretary-General
noted the “widespread interest in the fact that the United Nations is issuing the List” and that “a
number of Governments have indicated that new legislative measures are now under
consideration for the establishment and protection of national parks and equivalent reserves”.
This early UN recognition, supported by IUCN and the International Commission on National
Parks (now WCPA), provided an important impetus for the growing global momentum to
establish protected areas. The number of listed protected areas has subsequently increased
from just over 1,000 sites reported in the /962 UN List to over 12,754 sites listed in 1997, and
102,102 in the 2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas.

Global recognition of the importance of protected areas and their linkage to broader
environment and development issues has increased significantly during the past three decades.
This recognition has been reflected in the 1972 Stockholm Conference on the Human
Environment, the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development, the adoption and
implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and other international and
regional environmental agreements. The United Nations Environment Programme, which was
established in 1972 as a direct outcome of the Stockholm Conference, administers the CBD,
which now has 187 Contracting Parties. The implementation of the CBD, in particular Article
8 (In-situ Conservation), and the inclusion of protected areas as an indicator for the
Millennium Development Goals and the WSSD Plan of Implementation (2010 Targets) has
further highlighted the relevance of protected areas to global conservation and sustainable de-
velopment agendas.

Reinforcing the importance of the UN List process

The role of national governments through the UN system has provided the framework for
concerted and collaborative action on global environmental issues. With respect to protected
areas, this has involved a partnership with IUCN, WCPA and non-government organisations
that has spanned more than 40 years. During this time the extent and importance of protected
areas has increased, the global stakeholder base in conservation has widened considerably, the
United Nations Environment Programme has been established, and the role of the World
Database on Protected Areas endorsed by a number of international organisations.

As key mechanisms in the global collaborative process, the importance of the WDPA and
the UN List have been reinforced by Decision 22/1/III of the UNEP Governing Council in
February 2003 to update and renew the 1959 ECOSOC resolution. Specifically, the Council:

“[Agreed] that the United Nations Economic and Social Council resolution of
1959, subsequently endorsed by the General Assembly in 1962, needs to be
renewed and updated.”

and

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

[Requested] the Executive Director, working in collaboration with the United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, to seek a renewed mandate for the
United Nations List process from the Economic and Social Council/General
Assembly that reflects the role of the United Nations Environment Programme and
its agreement with the World Conservation Union on new partnership arrange-
ments for the World Database on Protected Areas."

This decision acknowledges the importance given to protected areas within the UN system,
and reinforces the value of partnership arrangements in achieving global conservation ob-
jectives. It also provides the basis for renewing the UN List mandate in the context of 21"

century protected area priorities.

2. The World Database on Protected
Areas

The WDPA is the largest repository of global information on protected areas. It has undergone
re-development throughout the 1980s and 1990s, reflecting changing systems, technologies
and needs. Originally implemented as a flat-file database only holding current protected areas
information (that is, with no historical content in the database), protected areas data has been
significantly extended’ over the years. Currently the information is held as two components:
current spatial extent and historic aspatial details. The aspatial component is a relational
database designed to support changing requirements and to facilitate more detailed analyses of
the information. It is also used in conjunction with the spatial data in many GIS analyses. An
important advance has been the on-line access provided in recent years via the Internet, access
not only to the analyses and compilations of the data but also to the underpinning data. The
implementation of the Internet interface allows ready access to the information at all times.
Users of the UN List are strongly encouraged to verify the current status of the information in
this report by using the Internet”, and notifying UNEP-WCMC of any errors or omissions
through the email address provided.

Future adaptations are already planned and will initially focus on enabling and encouraging
distributed updating of the information by experts with local knowledge.

In addition to production of the periodic UN List, the data in the WDPA has been used, and
continues to be used, to support a number of global and regional assessments, including:

a Circumpolar Protected Areas Network (CPAN) — Strategy and Action Plan (1996)

= Biodiversity Conservation in the Tropics: Gaps in Habitat Protection and Funding
Piorities (1997)

a WWF Forest for Life Campaign and Living Waters Campaign (1996/1998)
m= European Forests and Protected Areas: Gap Analysis (2000)

mw FAO Global Forest Resource Assessment (2000)

m Prioritisation of Target Areas For Forest Restoration (Report to WWF, 2000)
a Mountain Watch Study (2002)

= Protected areas information support for the V" World Parks Congress (2003)
gs Global Environment Outlook (ongoing)

a Global Biodiversity Outlook (ongoing)

= World Resources Report (ongoing)

= Protected area and thematic studies for the World Heritage Convention (ongoing)

' The information that supported this extension was held in records, but not initially included in the

, database. :
~ Website: http://sea-unep-weme.org/wdbpa/unlist

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

a Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
gw Millennium Development Goals

As well as providing input to these assessments the databases held by UNEP-WCMC are
frequently used in international oil spill emergency response action and contingency planning.
The protected areas database is a key component in the early stages of emergency response,
providing GIS- supported location maps of impacted areas. By incorporating this information
at the outset the responders are able quickly to identify areas of sensitivity that may require
specific protection. The information gathered during a response event is also fed back into the
database to improve the effectiveness of future responses.

In 2001, a survey and review of the WDPA was commissioned by the World Commission
on Protected Areas and undertaken in partnership with UNEP-WCMC. The review recom-
mended the adoption of the following vision and goals, subsequently adopted by the WCPA
Steering Committee in December 2001 and endorsed by UNEP-WCMC and IUCN:

Vision

A widely available, accurate and up-to-date World Database on Protected Areas that is
accepted as a world standard by all stakeholders (government, intergovernmental and non-
government), providing the essential link to information from multiple sources on protected

areas and contributing to effective resolution of protected area planning and management
issues at global, regional and national levels.

Goals

gw Readily available information on protected areas to support assessment, monitoring,
decision-making and development of policy at national and international levels.

m A core database on protected areas that is internationally recognised, current and
managed to international standards.

m= Improved access to information on protected areas that is already available on the
Internet and gradual increases in the information available.

@ Improved use of information and sharing of experience by protected area professionals.

In June 2002 the WCPA, IUCN, UNEP-WCMC and other organisations agreed to progress
the development of the WDPA through the formation of a Consortium of co-operative
stakeholders. The Consortium currently comprises representatives from intergovernmental
and non-government organisations, including the major global conservation organisations.
Since the formation of the Consortium, members have made valuable contributions to the
WDPA, including data that has improved the quality of information in the 2003 UN List.
Current members of the Consortium are:

American Museum of Natural History
BirdLife International

Conservation Biology Institute

Conservation International

Convention on Biological Diversity Secretariat
Fauna & Flora International

Ramsar Convention Secretariat

The Nature Conservancy

2. The World Database on Protected Areas

UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre
Wildlife Conservation Society

World Heritage Centre

World Resources Institute

World Wildlife Fund — WWF-US

World Wide Fund For Nature —- WWF-International

Other key stakeholders include:

Convention on Biological Diversity Secretariat
Ramsar Convention Secretariat

World Heritage Centre (UNESCO)

Man and Biosphere Programme (UNESCO)

3. Compilation of the 2003 UN List of
Protected Areas

Derivation of 2003 data

Participation of national protected area agencies and other organisations in updating data in the
WDPA is central to the UN List process.

In May 2002 the UNEP Executive Director and IUCN Director General jointly wrote to
national environment ministers, seeking their cooperation in updating protected areas in-
formation for their respective countries. At the same time, the WDPA Consortium members
agreed to contribute the WDPA country and regional protected area information that they held,
or to which they had access. Since the UN List is essentially based on the information provided
by national agencies, either directly or through delegated authorities such as the European
Environment Agency (EEA), it was important to include the broader WDPA Consortium
information before sending the information to countries for verification. This initial process
resulted in updates to 42 countries. A further nine updates were provided by other organi-
sations outside of the Consortium.

Following this process, UNEP-WCMC sent requests for updates and verification to 183
countries in November-December 2002, with hard copies of each country’s protected areas
information held in the WDPA. Explanatory notes to assist countries in completing the update
were also provided, including information on the IUCN protected area definition and appli-
cation of the management categories.

Through its cooperative agreement with UNEP-WCMC, the EEA undertook, through the
European Topic Centre on Nature Protection & Biodiversity (ETC/NPB), the updating of data
for the 38 countries covered by its authority. Although requests were sent to individual
countries in Southeast Asia, data were also provided by the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations Regional Centre for Biodiversity Conservation (ARCBC) for countries in the ASEAN
region. In the event that no information was received from official sources, research was
undertaken by UNEP-WCMC to obtain data — wherever possible — from published material
and other sources.

UNEP-WCMC received 86 direct official national replies, representing 47% of the total. In
addition, 15 official responses were received from European countries through the EEA/
ETC-NC 2003 review of Europe in time for inclusion in the 2003 UN List. However, the
WDPA was updated for all European countries through the Common Database on Designated
Areas (in partnership with EEA) in December 2002. Official data was also received for seven
ASEAN countries through ARCBC, although direct official responses were also received
from five of these countries. In effect, official updates were received from 103 countries, or
56% of all countries, through the combined efforts of UNEP-WCMC, EEA and ARCBC.

Criteria for inclusion

A review of the history of the UN List over the past 40 years shows that compilation of the UN
List has been an evolving process, reflecting:

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

w the broadening of the concepts and values of protected areas that are represented in the
UN List;

w the widening of the data collection base from only UN member countries to all countries
— in 1960 there were 99 UN member countries, and 52 responded to the first reporting
process; in 2002/2003 there were 191 UN members of which 103 responded,

w the shift in perspective on the size of protected areas to be included in the UN List, from
no restriction to 1,000ha ( 10km”) or 100ha if the protected area was on an island’, back
to no size restriction in 2003;

m the development, refinement and finally adoption in 1994 of the current IUCN Protected
Areas Management Categories system that reflects the range of protected area man-
agement objectives; and

= adoption by IUCN at the 1992 World Parks Congress of the current definition of a
protected area that is used as a basis for inclusion in the UN List.

As noted in the introduction, the 2003 UN List represents a further step in the evolution of

protected areas data presentation. The criteria for inclusion of protected areas in this edition
are:

(1) All protected areas with and without IUCN management categories, provided that
adequate information 1s available to ensure that they comply with the IUCN protected
areas definition.

(2) All protected areas regardless of size.
(3) All countries and territories.

(4) International and regional sites: Natural and Mixed World Heritage Sites, Ramsar
Sites, Biosphere Reserves, ASEAN Heritage Sites, European Commission Directive
on the Conservation of Wild Birds, and other regional designations.

Aspects of data presentation

The information provided in the 2003 UN List is a static snapshot of the World Database on
Protected Areas taken in July 2003. However, data is continuously augmented by information
provided by protected area agencies, organisations, individuals or groups active in protected
areas and conservation. The process of protecting an area can change over time, for example,
changes in size, classification, designation and gazetted status. Although the WDPA holds
information on proposed sites or those subject to designation procedures, these are not
included in the 2003 UN List.

Application of the IUCN Protected Area Management Categories

The current six categories system (see box below) was first applied in the 1997 UN List. In
assigning categories, UNEP-WCMC has largely depended on the information provided by
national governments, even though the IUCN 1994 Guidelines for Protected Area
Management Categories state:

“It...follows from the international nature of the system, and from the need for
consistent application of the categories, that the final responsibility for

* There was no size restriction in the 1962 List; in subsequent editions to 1974 a formula was adopted by
the International Commission for National Parks: minimum of 2,000ha in countries with a population
density <50 persons/km° or 500ha with a population density >50 persons/km7: then from 1974 to 1997
the criterion was a minimum of 1,000ha (10km7) or 100ha (1km’) on an island if the protected area
included the whole island.

10

3. Compilation of the 2003 UN List of Protected Areas

determining categories should be taken at the international level. This could be
IUCN, as advised by its CNPPA and/or the World Conservation Monitoring
Centre (e.g., in the compilation of the UN List) in close collaboration with IUCN.”

A large number of the original IUCN categories were applied by government agencies that
subsequently provided the information to UNEP-WCMC. In addition, in past years UNEP-
WCMC has allocated management categories based on assessment of management objectives
and legislation, and external (non-government) advice for those sites not categorised by
government agencies. Although assignments were made for the 1997 UN List, the report
noted:

“A major undertaking, completed as part of the preparation for this edition of the
UN List, has been the application of the new IUCN Management Categories...
Application of the new Management Categories system has been a lengthy and
challenging process, requiring the management objectives of each national desig-
nation to be reviewed in relation to the criteria and guidelines established for the
application of the new categories... It is likely, therefore, that not all protected
areas have been allocated to the most appropriate category.”

It is not possible for UNEP-WCMC and IUCN physically to undertake the assessment of
thousands of uncategorised protected areas, and no new assignments have been made for
uncategorised protected areas for the 2003 UN List. To deal effectively with this issue will
require the collaborative effort of all parties: national agencies and other protected area
owners, IUCN, WCPA, UNEP-WCMC and other conservation organisations. The outputs of
the current IUCN-University of Cardiff-UNEP-WCMC project, Speaking a Common
Language, and deliberations at the V"" World Parks Congress in September 2003, should also
contribute to a more effective and structured approach to assignment of the categories.

Some protected areas have more than one IUCN category assigned to them. For example,
the vast area of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park in Australia has been assigned Category VI
in its entirety, but has also been officially assigned other relevant categories that relate to
management zones within the park. In the current structure of the WDPA it is not possible to
assign multiple designations in the “IUCN Category” field. The only way to do this currently is
to create separate entries for each area or zone assigned a different category — which would in
effect create “separate” protected areas, and artificially increase the number of sites in the
database. This will be changed, but for the present, additional category assignments within
single protected areas are placed in the “notes” field so that a reviewer can still obtain the
relevant information. With respect to marine areas, changes will be based on the decision of
the WCPA Steering Committee at its meeting in December 2002. That is: “in relation to large
multi-purpose marine protected areas, zonation should be reflected in the World Database on
Protected Areas only under the following conditions: (a) zones are clearly mapped; (b) zones
are clearly defined in accordance with the IUCN protected area categories; and (c) zones are
recognized by law”.

Protected area designations used by countries are not necessarily directly comparable across
countries because of potentially different legislative regimes. Over 1,000 different terms are
known to be used around the world to designate protected areas. This highlights the value of a
single international system for assigning categories based on management objectives, and
therefore the importance of applying the IUCN categories.

11

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Definitions of the IUCN Protected Area Management Categories

CATEGORY la

Strict Nature Reserve: protected area managed mainly for science

Area of land and/or sea possessing some outstanding or representative ecosystems, geological or
physiological features and/or species, available primarily for scientific research and/or enviro-
nmental monitoring.

CATEGORY Ib

Wilderness Area: protected area managed mainly for wilderness protection

Large area of unmodified or slightly modified land, and/or sea, retaining its natural character and
influence, without permanent or significant habitation, which is protected and managed so as to
preserve its natural condition.

CATEGORY II

National Park: protected area managed mainly for ecosystem protection and recreation
Natural area of land and/or sea, designated to (a) protect the ecological integrity of one or more
ecosystems for present and future generations, (b) exclude exploitation or occupation inimical to
the purposes of designation of the area and (c) provide a foundation for spiritual, scientific,
educational, recreational and visitor opportunities, all of which must be environmentally and
culturally compatible.

CATEGORY Ill

Natural Monument: protected area managed mainly for conservation of specific natural
features

Area containing one, or more, specific natural or natural/cultural feature which is of outstanding
or unique value because of its inherent rarity, representative or aesthetic qualities or cultural
significance.

CATEGORY IV

Habitat/Species Management Area: protected area managed mainly for conservation
through management intervention

Area of land and/or sea subject to active intervention for management purposes so as to ensure
the maintenance of habitats and/or to meet the requirements of specific species.

CATEGORY V

Protected Landscape/Seascape: protected area managed mainly for landscape/ seascape
conservation and recreation

Area of land, with coast and sea as appropriate, where the interaction of people and nature over
time has produced an area of distinct character with significant aesthetic, ecological and/or
cultural value, and often with high biological diversity. Safeguarding the integrity of this
traditional interaction is vital to the protection, maintenance and evolution of such an area.

CATEGORY VI

Managed Resource Protected Area: protected area managed mainly for the sustainable
use of natural ecosystems

Area containing predominantly unmodified natural systems, managed to ensure long-term
protection and maintenance of biological diversity, while providing at the same time a sus-
tainable flow of natural products and services to meet community needs.

4. Layout of the 2003 UN List

Country summaries

A synthesis of each country’s data precedes the site listings, with information provided in the
following format:

ISO Code: IND Last Official Response: 2003
Country Summary
Category Ia 1 133,010

i ae

National sites

Protected areas are listed by country, in alphabetic order of the English-language version of the
country name. These are named by national designation (for example, national parks, nature
reserves, wildlife sanctuaries) in the following format:

AUSTRALIA

IUCN
Latitude/ Year of Management
Longitude Size (ha) establishment Category

Last WDPA
update

Commonwealth Marine Park

is Barrier! 99°00°S/150°00"wW | 34,540,000 1979

The latitude/longitude is based on a centre-point of the protected area. The year of estab-
lishment reflects when the current legal designation was applied; in some cases this may be
more recent than the original date of establishment, for example where the legal designation of
a site has changed. For some countries, such as Australia, Canada, India and the US, protected
areas are listed by state, province and territory. In some cases, the names of protected areas are
repeated with different site codes’ (for example, Leeuwin-Naturaliste National Park x 20548,

4 A code used by UNEP-WCMC to identify sites within the WDPA.

13

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

a

22673, 32376, 42065, and 8434). The reasons for this vary, but could result from variable
locations (for example, “cluster” protected areas with the same designation), different ad-
ministrative and/or management arrangements.

The 2003 UN List also contains 3,223 individual datasheets, hyperlinked from site names
where a sheet is available for that site. The datasheets hold additional information on aspects
relating to the ecological attributes and management of the area concerned. In addition, locator
maps are provided indicating the location, and the source of GIS data for the protected area. It
should be noted that many datasheets were prepared using information from earlier IUCN and
(then) WCMC publications and require updating. It is hoped that eventually links can be
established from the UNEP-WCMC website directly to those of individual protected areas or
national agencies where up-to-date information is held.

International sites

It should be noted that sites listed under ‘International Sites’ will also appear in the country
lists of protected areas.

World Heritage Sites

The Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage was
adopted in Paris in 1972, and came into force in December 1975. The Convention is
administered by UNESCO and provides for the designation of areas of “outstanding universal
value” as World Heritage sites, with the principal aim of fostering international cooperation in
safeguarding these important areas.

Every year the World Heritage Committee evaluates nominations by States Party to the
Convention, taking into account assessments made by the Advisory Bodies: IUCN for natural
and mixed site nominations; and ICOMOS for cultural sites. Information on the current 172
natural and mixed sites is presented in the 2003 UN List.

To be included on the World Heritage List, sites must satisfy one or more of the selection
criteria in the World Heritage Operational Guidelines, the main operational document on
World Heritage. The criteria have been revised regularly by the Committee to match the
evolution of the World Heritage concept.

Natural World Heritage properties should:

i. be outstanding examples representing major stages of the Earth’s history, including the
record of life, significant ongoing geological processes in the development of land-
forms, or significant geomorphic or physiographic features, or

ii. be outstanding examples representing significant ongoing ecological and biological
processes in the evolution and development of terrestrial, fresh water, coastal and
marine ecosystems and communities of plants and animals, or

iii. contain superlative natural phenomena or areas of exceptional natural beauty and
aesthetic importance, or

iv. contain the most important and significant natural habitats for in situ conservation of
biological diversity, including those containing threatened species of outstanding
universal value from the point of view of science or conservation.

Mixed sites have both universally outstanding natural and cultural values. Since 1992
significant interactions between people and the natural environment have also been recognised
through the listing of cultural landscapes (which are not included in the UN List). Protection,
management and integrity of the site are important considerations in World Heritage listing. If

14

4. Layout of the 2003 UN List

these aspects are severely compromised, the World Heritage Committee may designate a site
“in danger”, based on an assessment of the severity of threats that may affect its World
Heritage values.

In the 2003 UN List, World Heritage Sites are listed in alphabetical order of the English-
language version of the country name, in the following format. Note that only countries with
World Heritage Sites are listed. Sites that are on the World Heritage In Danger List in July
2003 are indicated accordingly.

World Heritage Sites

In-
danger

P Year of aes A 4 A
inscription Criteria Latitude/Longitude Size (ha) ae
2003
Comoé
National v 1983 N (11) (av) 8°05’-9°06"N/3°01’-4°04’"W | 1,149,250 v
Park

A further feature of the 2003 UN List is the inclusion of information datasheets for each
World Heritage Site. These site sheets are prepared by UNEP-WCMC for IUCN as part of the
nominated site evaluation process, updated by site evaluators and maintained in the database
for those sites that are inscribed on the World Heritage List.

Biosphere Reserves

Biosphere reserves are areas of terrestrial and coastal/marine ecosystems that
are internationally recognised under UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme.
They are designed to promote and demonstrate a balanced relationship between people and
nature. The reserves are nominated by national governments and remain under the sovereign
jurisdiction of the States where they are situated. In 2003, there are 436 Biosphere Reserves
recorded in the UN List.

The definition, criteria, and designation procedure of Biosphere Reserves are set out in the
Statutory Framework adopted by the UNESCO General Conference in 1995. The Seville
Strategy for Biosphere Reserves identifies objectives for the reserves at site, national
and international levels. Many of the sites have been designated for over 20 years and hence
are subject to the Periodic Review foreseen under Article 9 of the Statutory Framework. This
review aims to encourage the authorities concerned to revise their Biosphere Reserves in the
light of the Statutory Framework. Biosphere Reserves form a world network for promoting
cooperative research and monitoring as well as exchange of information, and development of
strong regional sub-networks.

In the 2003 UN List, Biosphere Reserves are listed by country, in alphabetic order of the
English-language version of the country name, in the following format. Note that only
countries with Biosphere Reserves are listed.

15

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Biosphere Reserves
Latitude/Longitude Size (ha) Year of designation

Resenvaide lasBiosfera de 9°45°S/77°28° W 399,239 1977
Huascaran

Reserva de la Bidsfera del Manu 12°11°S/71°477W 1,881,200 1977

Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites)

The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat
was signed in Ramsar (Iran) in 1971, and came into force in December 1975. This Convention
provides a framework for international cooperation for the conservation of wetland habitats. It
places general obligations on contracting Party States relating to the conservation of wetlands
throughout their territories, with special obligations pertaining to those wetlands that have
been placed on the List of Wetlands of International Importance. In 2003, there are 1,305
designated wetlands.

Each State Party is obliged to list at least one site. Wetlands are defined by the Convention
as: areas of marsh, fen, peatland or water, whether natural or artificial, permanent or temp-
orary, with water that is static or flowing, fresh, brackish or salt, including areas of marine
waters, the depth of which at low tide does not exceed six metres.

In the 2003 UN List, Ramsar Sites are listed by country in alphabetic order of the
English-language version of the country name, in the following format. Note that only
countries with Ramsar Sites are listed.

I Im

Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites)

Year of designation
Traslévslage-Morups ° 69> cQn © 19? «oN
56° 58’ 59"N/12° 19’ 59"E 1,990 1989

63° 14 N/14? 357 59°E 2001

European Commission Directive on the Conservation of Wild Birds (Birds Directive,
1979)

The Birds Directive has been in force since April 1981 and imposes legal obligations on
European Union Member States to maintain populations of naturally occurring wild birds at
levels corresponding to ecological requirements, to regulate trade in birds, to limit hunting of
species able to sustain exploitation, and to prohibit certain methods of capture and killing.
Article 4 requires Member States to take special measures to conserve the habitat of certain
listed threatened bird species as well as migratory bird species, particularly with regard to
wetlands, through the designation of Special Protection Areas (SPAs). To date 1,496 SPAs
have been established. All SPAs form part of NATURA 2000, the EU network of protected
areas.

16

4. Layout of the 2003 UN List

List of Special Protection Areas (EC Directive 79/409)

LatitudeLongituae | Sizechay) |
eee SN
Ballycotton Bay 51° 50°N/008° 00°W

Other protected area-related regional agreements

There are a number of other European agreements requiring establishment of protected areas
that are included in the UN List:

= Council of Europe — Biogenetic Reserves (340 sites)

m= Barcelona Convention — Specially Protected Areas of Mediterranean Importance (230
sites)

a EC Habitats Directive — Special Areas for Conservation (212 sites)
m= European Diploma Type ‘A’ (36 sites), Type ‘B’ (11 sites), Type ‘C’ (7 sites)
mw Helsinki Convention — Baltic Sea Protected Areas (3 sites)

In addition to the European sites, there are 11 sites listed as ASEAN Heritage Parks and
Reserves under the ASEAN Declaration on Heritage Parks and Reserves (1984).

7

5. Information gaps, limitations and
explanatory notes

It should be noted that information is not necessarily complete for each country — especially for
countries that have not provided updates during 2002-2003. The dataset for the 2003 UN List
is also subject to the following limitations:

m The size is unknown for 23,428 (23%) protected areas. This means that the extent of
regional and global protected areas networks is somewhat under-represented, although
the missing information is largely that of the smaller sites.

m The date of establishment is unknown for 48,654 protected areas. In this case, the
database reflects the date of entry of the protected area into the database. In some years,
when bulk updates occur” this can artificially inflate the number of protected areas
registered in that year (this acts as a crude proxy indicating that the sites were es-
tablished “no later than” this date). As information about the year of protected area
establishment is obtained these sites are recorded against their correct year.

m IUCN management categories have not been assigned to 33,036 protected areas.
m= Geographic co-ordinates are still lacking for 20,634 sites.

m UNEP-WCMC does not yet have the geographical boundaries (polygons) of 74,512
protected areas°. Although this is a large figure, the larger sites (>100km?) have a much
better coverage than the small sites. This problem still limits the extent to which
terrestrial and marine protected areas can be treated separately or compared, and
constrains GIS analyses of the representativeness of protected areas. In the case of
marine protected areas, 1,799 out of the 4,459 (over 40%) in the WDPA have polygons.
However, in terms of area, 89% of the marine protected areas are in the form of
polygons. This due to the inclusion of single large marine protected areas, such as the
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.

m Translation of some languages, such as Chinese and Arabic, into English can lead to
unintentional duplication of site records when updates are received with apparently
different site names, which are actually transliteration variants. This has at times
resulted in some duplication of sites. An intensive effort was made during the pro-
duction of the 2003 UN List to minimise this problem. However, it is estimated that this
type of error could affect 5%-—7% of the database for these countries, and support is
urgently needed from the relevant nations to rectify this problem.

mu The WDPA is attempting to incorporate privately owned and managed protected areas,
even where these do not have legal protection, and these are included (for the first time)

> For example, for the UN List years and in 2001 when a bulk update of the European Common Database
on Designated Areas (CDDA) took place.

® UNEP-WCMC has in fact made considerable progress in obtaining GIS boundary data for many of the
world’s protected areas, which is now linked to the aspatial information contained in the WDPA.
However, it should be noted that some countries, although providing this information, have placed
restrictions on its use and availability through licence agreements with UNEP-WCMC.

19

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

where they are considered to meet the IUCN PA definition. However, many sites are
undoubtedly missing from this classification.
m= UNEP-WCMC is aiming to remove the duplication caused by multiple designations of

the one geographic site. Some duplication remains; however, from a statistical stand-
point it is possible to filter out these duplications in the GIS analyses and so avoid double

counting.

20

EEE

6. Analysis of global protected area
trends

The compilation of the UN List, through the WDPA updating process, provides a unique
opportunity to review and summarise the status of the world’s protected areas. The UN List
provides the basis for assessing:

= growth in protected area numbers and extent at national, regional and global levels, as
well as sub-national (province, state) levels for a number of countries;

m application of IUCN management categories, and the trends in protected area estab-
lishment on the basis of management objectives at sub-national, national, regional and
global levels;

m extent of global protection for the world’s biomes;

m= growth in international sites, and the extent of application of international conventions
and programmes;

m gaps in the global system of protected areas, and future priorities for action.

The data provided in the 2003 UN List will enable various analyses to be undertaken by a
range of data users — especially with the new format that now includes all protected areas. The
information is presented so that separate analyses can be undertaken using the total protected
area numbers and area, or using only those that have been assigned IUCN management
categories. The following sections provide key analyses of the global data undertaken by
UNEP-WCMC.

Number and extent of the world’s protected areas

The 2003 UN List contains 102,102 protected areas covering more than 18.8 million km’. This
figure is equivalent to 12.65% of the Earth’s land surface, or an area greater than the combined
land area of China, South Asia and Southeast Asia. If marine protected areas are excluded from
these calculations (see discussion of marine areas below) the terrestrial extent of protected
areas is some 17.1 million km” (11.5% of the land surface). This is almost the same area as the
entire continent of South America. Summary statistics are presented in Table | and Figure 1.
The total number and extent of protected areas presents the current global overview of the
status of protection. However, it is the classification of protected areas into IUCN
Management Categories that enables a distinction to be made on the basis of management
objectives that countries are applying to their conservation estate, ranging from sites that are
strictly protected through to those under sustainable use. This is the second UN List to present
protected areas data using the six management categories system. The 2003 figures highlight
the importance of the categories in establishing an international standard for classifying
protected areas, and also the extent to which they are being applied by governments and other
bodies that manage protected areas.

The overview of global statistics indicates that 67% of the world’s protected areas have been
assigned an IUCN management category, covering 81% of the total area protected. Among the
categorised sites, the largest number lie within Category IV (Habitat/Species Management

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Area) and Category III (Natural Monument). Together they comprise almost 47% of all
protected areas. This is not surprising, since protected areas assigned to these categories often
cover small geographic areas — especially in the case of Category III]. Many of these small
protected areas have been excluded in previous UN Lists because their areas are less than
10km”. Examination of the regional data (see Annex) also reveals that some regions have large
numbers of Category IV sites, notably South Asia (44.5% of all protected areas), Europe
(39%), and North Eurasia (29.6%). Both South Asia and North Eurasia have large areas of
Category IV (5.5% and 48.1% respectively). Categories Ia, Ib, II, V and VI together only
comprise 20% of the total number of protected areas with Category II (National Park)
comprising 3.8% and Category VI (Managed Resource Protected Area) 4%.

Turning to category by area, the picture changes dramatically, with Category II and
Category VI comprising 47% of all protected areas. But this is not surprising, since national
parks, in terms of management objectives, have traditionally been established to protect larger
areas at the ecosystem and landscape level. The 2003 figures reflect the trend in previous UN
Lists, although in relative terms the extent of Category II is marginally less than it was in 1997.
However, the considerable extent of Category VI is a relatively recent phenomenon. It was the
most significant innovation in the last revision of [UCN’s management category system, and
recognised the important role protected areas play in the sustainable livelihoods of local
people. Whilst dedicated to biodiversity conservation, such sites accommodate local people
and a degree of sustainable use as an integral part of site management. In the 1997 UN List,
Category VI sites accounted for 27% of the total extent of recorded protected areas using the
criteria for that UN List. If non-categorised protected areas are excluded from the 2003 figures
(see discussion below and Table 2), 28.9% of the area of protected areas has been assigned to
Category VI. Two of the world’s largest protected areas are classified as Category VI, namely
the Ar-Rub’al-Khali Wildlife Management Area (640,000km? ) in Saudi Arabia and the Great
Barrier Reef Marine Park in Australia (345,400km? ). Together, these two sites account for
22.5% of the total area under this management category — although it should be noted that the
total area of the GBRMP has been subdivided into other IUCN categories based on the
management objectives of legally defined zones within the park.

For comparative purposes, Table 2 presents the indicative ranking of 1997 and 2003
proportional percentage values by IUCN category (that is, excluding sites without categories).
Some aspects of the global pattern of protected areas remain unchanged. These include:
Category IV the most numerous; Category II the greatest extent; and Categories Ia and Ib the
least in number and extent. The substantial increase in the numbers of Categories III and IV
can be explained by the inclusion of all size classes in the 2003 UN List. The inclusion of all
sizes also affects the proportional relationship of other categories.

Figure 2 shows the distribution of protected areas by size class. Of the 102,102 protected
areas recorded in the 2003 UN List, 59,478 (58.25%) are less than 10km’ in size. There are
41,997 (41.13%) with IUCN categories (see Figures 3 and 4).

6. Analysis of global protected area trends

Figure 1. Global protected area number and extent 2003

Global: Number and percentage distribution of categorised and non-categorised
protected areas

Total Global Number PAs: 102,102

aie! 1,302
4.6% 413% 3,881
3.8%

33,036
33.4% |

\

Global: Area (km?) and percentage distribution of categorised and non-categorised
protected areas

Total Global Protected Area:
18,763,407 Km?

1,033,888

5.5% 1,016,612
[ 54%

3,669,820

4,413,142
“23.5%

4,377,091

A 276,432
1.5%

“~~ 3,022,616
16.1%

1,066,088 /
5.6%

Bm» Bs Bow Ov By

Vi ae No category

23

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

$$

Figure 2. Global number and area of protected area by size class

G8 Total area of sites —— Total number of sites
+ 7,000,000,00
Sites <10km? (1000 ha)
+ 6,000,000.00
+ 5,000,000.00

+ 4,000,000,00

+ 3,000,000.00

8
@
)
S
2
€
3
z

Area of sites (km*)

+ 2,000,000.00

+ 1,000,000.00

0.00

S$ F F S
2S eG
x Se gf

& $

Size class (km?)

Figure 3. Global number of protected areas by IUCN category and size class
Sites < 10km*(1000ha)

i , ) ' q
t) | i P= | ——
x > NS ns Ry £
ao 2 x ° x ° Se ae s

S RK :
9 & - a S

Number of sites

Size class (km’)

go EP Pe

&

Sites < 10km’ (1000ha)

Area of sites (km?)

i

Rs a
& p 3 S

Size class (km?)

24

6. Analysis of global protected area trends

Table 1. Global number and extent of protected areas

Proportion of total no. Proportion of
No. of protected areas Area Covered total area protected
Category sites (%) (km?) (%)

la 4,731 4.6 1,033,888 S):0)

Ib 1,302 1.3 1,015,512 5.4

I 3,881 3.8 4,413,142 23.6

Ul 19,833 19.4 275,432 IN)

IV 27,641 Piles 3,022,515 16.1

Vv 6,555 6.4 1,056,008 5.6

VI 4,123 4.0 4,377,091 233
No Category 34,036 33.4 3,569,820 19.0
Total 102,102 100.00 18,763,407 100.00

Table 2. Indicative ranking of 1997 and 2003 proportional percentage values by
IUCN Category (excluding non-categorised sites)

Number (%) Area (%) Number (%) Area (%)

Growth of the world’s protected areas

The continuing growth in the world’s protected areas is illustrated in Figures 5—7. Figure 5
depicts the cumulative number (line) and total area (columns) of protected areas in five-year
increments, commencing in 1872 (the establishment of Yellowstone National Park). Protected
areas where the year of establishment is not known are included in the 2003 total. It should be
noted that the cumulative graph is only indicative of the general trend. As noted earlier in the
discussion, major data inputs since the 1997 UN List have included large numbers of sites
without dates, therefore it is not possible to accurately represent growth in protected areas
during this period. In Figure 5, as noted in the 1997 UN List analysis, the columns indicating
the cumulative total area protected “show little or no sign of any declining rate of estab-
lishment, perhaps contradicting the widely held view that opportunities to establish new
protected areas are diminishing”. However, Figures 6 and 7 show the more detailed cumu-
lative growth for the period 1997-2003. Figure 6 indicates a significant increase in Categories
III and IV, and in non-categorised protected areas. The areas shown in Figure 7 reflect an
increase in Category IV and those without categories. Although the data for Category VI show

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

little change in the number, the total area shows a marked increase, perhaps as a result of
extensions to existing sites.

Since the V" World Parks Congress will be convened in 2003 it is appropriate to highlight
the growth in protected areas using as a benchmark the years in which the World Parks
Congress has been held (data derived from WDPA records, not figures published in previous
UN Lists):

Table 3. Protected areas in World Parks Congress years

Year Number Area
1962 9,214 2.4 million km?
1972 16,394 4.1 million km?
1982 27,794 8.8 million km?
1992 48,388 12.3 million km?
2003 102,102 18.8 million km?

Figure 5. Cumulative growth in protected areas by 5-year increment: 1872-2003

mums Area of sites ———Number of sites

18,000,000
100,000

16,000,000

14,000,000

12,000,000

10,000,000

8,000,000

g
a
-
°
-
oa
=
J
=
=
=

6,000,000

4,000,000

2,000,000
o 0

1872 1887 1902 1917 1932 1947 1962 1977 1992 2003
Year

26

6. Analysis of global protected area trends
a ee eee ee

Figure 6. Cumulative growth in global number of protected areas: 1997 to 2003

ala elb wll alll e@IV SV & VI BNo category

Number of sites

No category

sla elb wll will a!V @V a Vi BNo category

Area of sites

No category

Coastal and marine protected areas

The UN List includes a large number of protected areas that incorporate shoreline and marine
habitats, including those that are specifically dedicated to marine conservation. Consequently,
a calculation based on the extent of land area will be inflated by these marine sites.

According to World Database on Protected Areas records, 4,459 protected areas in the UN
List contain marine and coastal elements, covering 4.2 million km’, however only part of this
total figure is marine as the sites also contain lana areas. The largest marine protected area is
the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park in Australia (345,400km’). Until such time as digital
boundary data are available for all protected areas, the use of Simple habitat markers to identify
marine areas will inevitably lead to some degree of error in summary statistics. Utilising the
currently held GIS data, with the addition of large sites without polygon boundaries but known

Dif

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

to be largely or entirely marine, the current best estimate for actual protected sea area is 1.7
gelion km’, or 9.1% of the 2003 global total of 18.8 million km’. This figure represents only
0.5% of the surface area of the oceans.

Extent of protection of the world’s terrestrial biomes

The extent to which the global protected areas network is representative of the world’s major
terrestrial biomes is summarised in Table 4, based on Udvardy’s biogeographical clas-
sification. The Udvardy system is used so that a comparison can be made with analysis
undertaken at UNEP-WCMC by Green and Paine’, which was based on the 1997 UN List data.
However, it should be noted that the 1997 analysis under-represented the protection of biomes
by about 30%. This is because only 16,636 (55%) of the 30,350 protected areas were
classified, although the data used represented just over 70% of the global protected areas
network at that time.

The present analysis suggests that the 10% target established for the protection of biomes at
the III World Parks Congress in 1982 has been reached or exceeded for nine of the 14 biomes.
It can be seen from the current analysis that there is a substantial increase in the coverage of
some biomes, notably Tropical Humid Forests (23.3% from 8.8%), Subtropical/Temperate
Rainforests (16.9% from 10.3%) and Mixed Island Ecosystems (29.7% from 16.32%). This
increase results from the additional, recent protected areas information that has been input to
the WDPA for both categorised and non-categorised sites. For example, excluding sites
without categories, protected area coverage of the Tropical Humid Forests biome would have
increased to 12.9%. The biomes that still fall well short of the target are Lake Systems (1.54%)
and Temperate Grasslands (4.59%) — also noted by Green and Paine in 1997. The Vv" World
Parks Congress will present an opportunity to review the efficacy of using the Udvardy biome
approach vis-d-vis other methods of biogeographic region analysis. Another issue that needs to
be addressed is conservation of marine ecosystems through a global, ecologically repre-
sentative system of protected areas. The importance of this issue was highlighted by the World
Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg in 2002. Consequently, the
WSSD Plan of Implementation calls for the establishment of effective marine protected area
systems by 2012.

As well as ensuring biogeographic and ecosystem representativeness, it is essential that
existing protected areas are effectively managed to ensure that the objectives for establishing
protected areas are achieved. The statistical, mainly quantitative, overview provided by the
UN List provides no basis for assessing this effectiveness.

” Michael J.B. Green and James Paine, State of the World’s Protected Areas at the End of the Twentieth
Century. Paper presented at [UCN World Commission on Protected Areas Symposium on ‘Protected
Areas in the 21st Century: From Islands to Networks’, Albany, Australia, 24—-29th November 1997.

28

6. Analysis of global protected area trends

cs'9 cO°TL SLI‘07Z Ip6LIS*LT 097°06 8S9°S09°SPhT TIVLOL
Vo ps'l 87 686-L 19¢ S69'LIS SUId}SAG YLT
ce ol €L'6C p9e 671° L96 Str ENS‘ TST'E SUI9}SAG Pues] POXI|N
016 ce ol 88el 8Z8°SEL'T Sre'6 Srleeo Ol sulg}sAg UTeJUNOY| POX!
86°0 6S P cS8 6E8 TIP EES€ 16S°9L6'8 spurjssein oyesoduio],
cyl ve sl Sc Ole PS9 Sle TES PIT SYPUURALES spuLfssesD [eoidory,
88 P81 Ov 170°909°Z SOV 06€°L10°7Z SoUNUIUOD) eIpun |,
06'S I9°L O8S LEO'VOL SETI TST OST6 S}9Saq] 19}UIM\-P1O)
esT LTO! 806 LLECO6P'T 800°7 €v8 6LT PT SHOsod-IWlaG/SHosod We
6c Pr p9'01 £69 L8S°66€ pees pri LsL€ syso1o,f sno[[Aydora]og wae1s190Aq
09'€ p9'L Ipe6 ZOS‘9S8 SEL'SE 6S99IT TI SySo10 J Jeo|-peorg oyesodus |
LOL LLTl Iss'l £9SOITT OP'S SES TIE LI spue[pooM/s}soro.j Arq eordory,
cL’S 19°8 ssr'e IZZOSE'I LOT El LI8°Z89'S1 cael eee

$]SO10,J Jd'T-9[PION aJes9dw9 |,

SpUL]POO AA /SISOIOJUILY

6c 01 co 91 LCT pLI $99 9619 6L6 0£6 € aqeiaduia J jeoidonqns

LL'8 Ieee £C9 bre Osr't (G6as OITEIS OL syso1o, prumy [eordory,

(eaue ou
YUM Says *}9Uu!)
Jaquinu je}OL

ISIT NN E002 — SBdAVV P2}99}01d

sisAjeuy 2661 Base OU YIM
SdyIS JO JOQUNN

(24) }UaIXy aweu awoilg

p9}99}01dg SWOIg %

(gz61 ‘Apaeapn) S3INOId

SOWOIG [214]S9.119} JOlewW S,PjAOM ay} JO UOI}D9}OId Jo JUaIXA “py B1IGeL

ay

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Analysis by regions

This edition of the UN List includes analyses of regional protected area statistics. The global
divisions used are based on the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas terrestrial
regions (South America and Brazil regions have been combined). The rationale for choosing
IUCN, rather than United Nations, regions, is based on: their geographic logic; the long-
standing relationship of the WCPA to the UN List process; the global representation of the
WCPA network; the WCPA role in encouraging adoption of the IUCN management cate-
gories; and the fact that the V'" World Parks Congress is to be convened later in 2003. The
statistics presented in the 2003 UN List will assist, as they have done for previous congresses
spanning 40 years, in the presentations and debates in Durban in September 2003.

Analyses for the WCPA regions are presented as pie charts showing the key statistics for
number and area. The charts reveal considerable variation from region to region in terms of the
application of IUCN management categories, and the different emphases placed on manage-
ment objectives for protected areas. A summary of the major category type in each region, by
area, is presented in Table 5. Where most sites are not categorised (NC), the figure is included
with the highest percentage IUCN category.

Table 5. Predominant categories in IUCN WCPA regions by area

IUCN WCPA Region Predominant Category % Area Protected
Antarctic Ia 81.0
Australia and New Zealand VI 39.8
Caribbean I 39.0
Central America NC 34.6

II 19.7

East Asia Ib 44.2
Eastern and Southern Africa NC 31.9
VI 28.3

Europe Vv 46.1
North Africa and Middle East VI 62.0
North America II 36.7
North Eurasia IV 48.1
Pacific VI 52.6
South America and Brazil NC 52.4
I es)

South Asia IV 50.5
Southeast Asia VI 26.8
Western and Central Africa IV 34.1

SS

30

6. Analysis of global protected area trends
EEE ae eee eee ey re eek et eee

Note on the WCPA Antarctic Region

The data for the Antarctic region requires explanation. This vast area (14,024,488km/) appears
severely under-represented (70,294km’ or 0.5% of the total area) as most of the protected areas
recorded are those established in the Sub-Antarctic island territories of various countries.
However, Antarctica (the area south of 60° South latitude) is protected through the 1959
Antarctic Treaty and its Environmental Protection Protocol. Through this agreement, the
countries active in Antarctica consult on the uses of a whole continent. The Treaty now has 44
signatories, 27 are Consultative Parties on the basis of being original signatories or by
conducting substantial research there. The treaty is administered through Antarctic Treaty
Consultative Meetings, which includes designation and management of protected areas. The
Environmental Protection Protocol to the Treaty was ratified in 1997. Under this Protocol the
whole continent of Antarctica and its dependent marine ecosystems is designated a “natural
reserve devoted to peace and science”. Article 3 of Annex V — Area Protection and
Management — provides for the establishment of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas, in-
cluding any marine area. Although not reflected in the 2003 UN List, the world’s protected
areas estate has increased considerably as a result of this Protocol.

7. Updating the World Database on
Protected Areas

Protected areas now form a major component of the way governments and other bodies utilise
and manage the Earth’s resources. The periodic UN List of Protected Areas is an important
tool for monitoring the progress of this important aspect of human endeavour: conservation
and wise use of the planet’s remaining wild resources and places.

The World Database on Protected Areas underpins the UN List and in order to maintain the
currency of the WDPA and improve its accuracy UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and the World
Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) request protected area agencies, organisations and
individuals to review national data and advise UNEP-WCMC of any discrepancies and/or
updates. As noted earlier in the report, protected area data can be reviewed through the
Centre’s website.

33

ae

Ect) OWIOk adoun: ueeqque:
uy | | F] || eS 3]
edly J2jUD pue Wa} M =
3 yn n ie eoldy WayNoS pue use}seR puejeez menyelieqsny we
elsy jsey yjnos eiseiny YON [ !
a eis sey \Ze4g
Bisy UINES a eo rettty IUCN Si] (5. 4

onoequ'
(o\uedsiy) eouewy yynos | 1823 eIPPIW pue eo1yy YON || eoueuy jeued | | noueuy{ |

WdOM Jo suoiBey jelujsaua] au)

uolbay WdOM NONI Aq jueyxg puke sequinn ealy pej99}01d "*XOUUY

35

Annex. Protected Area Number and Extent by IUCN WCPA Region

Number and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

Total Protected Areas
in Region: 126

No category

Antarctic

Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

461 10
0.7% 0.01%

Total Area Protected in
Region: 70,294 km?
(0.5% land area)

Region contains: Antarctica, Bouvet Island, Falkland Islands, French Southern Territories, Heard and McDonald
Islands, St. Helena, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands

Australia and New Zealand

Number and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

Total Protected Areas
in Region: 8,724

391

9,
404 4.5%

4.6%
225
2.6%

1,230
14.1%

i,

Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

Total Area Protected in
Region: 1,187,320 km?
(14.82% land area)

728

472,424 |
39.8%

294,937
24.8%

33,576
77,640 2.8%
6.5%

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Caribbean

Number and Percentage Distribution Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas Protected Areas

Total Protected Areas TRS eioIes aOR
ms 1g 1,776 183 (29.59% land area)
‘ 6.2%

2.6% \ 0.3%
0.1%

Region contains: Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Cuba,
Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Haiti, Jamaica, Martinique, Montserrat, Netherlands
Antilles, Puerto Rico, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and
Tobago, Turks and Caicos Islands, Virgin Islands (British), Virgin Islands (US)

Central America

Number and Percentage Distribution Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas Protected Areas

19 =
Total Protected Areas 9 47 Total Area Protected in 5,129
in Region: 762 20% 6.2% Region: 145,322 km? 3.5% _ 8,206
(27.86% land area) 5.6%
88

Region contains: Belize, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, El Salvador

38

Annex. Protected Area Number and Extent by IUCN WCPA Region

Number and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

Total Protected Areas
in Region: 2,098

East Asia

Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

Total Area Protected in
91,837 Region: 1,031,813 km?

35,153
8.9% (8.77% land area)

3.4%

118,219

455,688
44.2%

120,469

107,127
10.4%

Region contains: China, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Hong Kong, Japan, Macao, Mongolia, Republic

of Korea, Taiwan, Province of China

Eastern and Southern Africa

Number and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

otal Protected Areas in|
Region: 4,852

Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

Total Area Protected in
Region: 1,967,242 km?
(17.17% land area)

2,550
i 504,692
BEES 25.7%

628,512
31.9%

150
0.01%

261,122

Region contains: Botswana, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mayotte, Mozambique,
Namibia, Réunion, Seychelles, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania,

Zambia, Zimbabwe

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Europe

Number and Percentage Distribution Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas Protected Areas

923 419 9473 69,207

9, 116,751
2.1% \1.0% [9 6% 3,696 ieee 9.2% 4,306
9

8.6% 0.6%

98,165
13.1%

3,969
0.5%

345,821
Total Protected Areas 46.1%
in Region: 43,018

Total Area Protected in

Region contains: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Federal Republic of Germany, Finland, France, Gibraltar, Greece,
Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Monaco,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Svalbard and Jan
Mayen Islands, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Vatican City State (Holy See), Yugoslavia,

North Africa and Middle East

Number and Percentage Distribution Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas Protected Areas

Total Area P i
otal Protected Areas in Reign 272. pene

Region: 1,133 (9.92% land area)

5,252 34

0.4% 9
59,037 A 0.0% 215,852

17.0%

114,358
9.0%

788,818
62.0%

Region contains: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Islamic Republic of, Iraq, Israel, Jordan,
Kuwait, Lebanon, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syrian Arab Republic,
Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Western Sahara, Yemen

40

Annex. Protected Area Number and Extent by IUCN WCPA Region

North America

Number and Percentage Distribution Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas Protected Areas

66,838
otal Protected Areas in| Bi,088 1.5% 475,327
Region: 13,369 LEO Ty Eid 0.4%

| .
4.3% SS
1,670,465
1,323 135,401 367724
9.9% 3.0%

72,554 | Total Area Protected in
1.6% | Region: 4,552,905 km?
é (20.79% land area)

Region contains: Canada, Greenland, Mexico, St. Pierre and Miquelon, United States

North Eurasia

Number and Percentage Distribution Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas Protected Areas

A Total Area Protected in
tal Protected Ai
ig “Reuion: 4a a 3 Region: 1,816,735 km?
“ (8.22% land area)

3321118 359,038
407 18.3% 19.8%

417
0.30%~ 2.3%

126,989
7.0%

25,479
1.4%

874,110
48.1%

Region contains: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Republic of Moldova,
Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan

4]

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Pacific

Number and Percentage Distribution Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas Protected Areas

27
8.4%

1 Total Area Protected in
[Total Protected Areas in| 49 Region: 20,489 km?
Region: 321 12.5% (3.7% land area)

Region contains: American Samoa, Cook Islands, Fiji, French Polynesia, Guam, Kiribati, Marshall Islands,
Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, New Caledonia, Niue, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, Papua New
Guinea, Pitcairn, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tokelau, Tonga, Tuvalu, United States Minor Outlying Islands,
Vanuatu, Wallis and Futuna Islands

South America and Brazil

Number and Percentage Distribution Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas Protected Areas

z Total Area Protected in
\Total Protected Areas in| Region: 4,137,180 km?
Region: 2,749 (22.2% land area)
3

90,682 1,889
2.3% | 0.05%

L

86,523
2.2%

102,258
2.6%

2,075,676
52.4%

269,338
6.8%

641,920
16.2%

Region contains: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guyana, Peru, Paraguay,
Suriname, Uruguay, Venezuela

42

Annex. Protected Area Number and Extent by IUCN WCPA Region

South Asia

Number and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

31 1
2.1% 0.1% 2,758 200
0.9% 0.1%

658
44.5%

otal Protected Areas in|
Region: 1,477

Region contains: Bangladesh, Bhutan, British Indian Ocean Territory, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri
Lanka

Total Area Protected in
Region: 308,826 km? 155,831
(6.87% land area)

Southeast Asia

Number and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

otal Protected Areas in|
Region: 2,656

Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas

Total Area Protected in
759,788 km?
9% land area)

21,317 15,646
2.8% 2.1%

161,310

213,698
28.1%

118,882
15.6%

Region contains: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, East Timor, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar,

Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Viet Nam

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Western and Central Africa

Number and Percentage Distribution Area (km?) and Percentage Distribution
of Categorised and Non-Categorised of Categorised and Non-Categorised
Protected Areas Protected Areas

Total Area Protected in
otal Protected Areas in| Region: 1,125,926 km?
Region: 2,605 (8.77% land area) 22,865 ere

2.0%
277,182 10%

357,754
31.8%

Region contains: Angola, Burundi, Benin, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Cape Verde, Chad,
Cameroon, Comoros, Congo, Cote d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea,
Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda,
Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo

44

9362°

3 /-92-807

IUCN:= The World Conservation Union

Founded in 1948, The World Conservation Union

brings together States, government agencies and a

diverse range of non-governmental organizations in a

unique world partnership: nearly. 1000 members in all,

spread across some 140 countries. :

As a Union, IUCN seeks to influence, encourage and AY tgp
assist societies throughout the world to conserve the ses
integrity and diversity of nature and-to’ensure that any = ‘ ne ie
use of natural resources is.equitable and ecologically f J é :
sustainable. ; ; Sp . Ries, yt i

x

rye

The World Cons€rvation Union builds-on the <=
strengths of its mlembers, networks and partners to
enhance their capacity and to support global alliances
to safeguard natural resources at local, regional and
globe levels.

UNEP- womc*

=-The UNEP:WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING :
CENTRE is the biodiversity assessment and «
policy implementation arm of the United Nations Z irae
Environment. Progtamme (UNEP), the: world’s foremost Z ‘
intergovernmental e@hvironmental organization.
UNEP-WCMG aims to help decision-makers recognize |;
the value-of biadiversity to people everywhere; and to
apply this knowledge in all that they do. The Centre’s
challenge is to transform complex data into policy-
relevant information, to build tools and systems for
analysis and integration of these data, and to support
the needs of nations’4nd the international community
as they engage in joint programmes of action.

IUCN Publications Services Unit
219c Huntingdon Road
Cambridge CB3 ODL, UK.”

Tel: +44 1223277894

Fax: +44 1223 277175

E-mail: info@books.iucn.org

UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre
219c Huntingdon Road

Cambridge CB3 ODL, UK

Tel: +44 1223 277314

Fax: +44 1223 277136

E-mail: info@unep-wcmc.org f Sie -S EA

IUCN 4aWCPA

ee oe COMMISSION
The World Conservation Union wa PROTECTED AREAS