■tx r;"i'Uir-.'!S !!ilt|--lg^!: '! r r^^'W; V.' V\ 1 K^ 'ii'J WbB)^ t ' It- ^- "^j ,»- , 1- • ( ^ < ^ ' ■» ' «Trt. !« • ^g^- •. ' » II J - r»_s ■•«?SgHiii!m-ff«5|;^ -■'i I, ■u (ft s4i^i ^^^- r^*». I'^T-f* V "Slt' f l( • «) J. :. V t ; ■: ' ■■" '\xm'% imm JAM 24 1919 THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY XL VA ^ CoP' 5 7 -■s^? S^!:ih---i?-^ ■a*^i5^;*; ■ ■a^;is^ 1-- ''%V .' MV- 'i_^a.».t i yt . .1 ? ;, .- i^-^^r^ii. ■::■■-: .^-^- J^^^T^v^^'^-v^ i^' mmmw flavors UBm\ , JAN 24 J919 ■ ^'.;;i FOURTH ANNUAL RBPORT -OF THE- Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Assoeiation Organized February 26, 1891, -AT- SPRINGFIELD, ILL. COMPILED BY JAMES A. STONE, Secretary, R. R. 4, Springfield, 111. CHICAGO, ILL. : AMERICAN BEE JOURNAL PRINT, 1905. .: ■^'■■■'■-- ■■■ ^-:"^T--'-^--'^:n:. OFFICERS AND'MEMBERS -OF THE- Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association ■ FOR 1905. OI^I^ICEI^S. President— ' » » J. 0. SMITH, Lincoln Vice^'Pf esidents ^ 1st— AARON COFFIN, Wenona ll 2d— S. P^< BLACK, Qayton ^\ 3d- J. W, P^IMM, Springfiel^ * ' 4th— J. W. BOWEN, Jacksonville 5th— JAS, FOINDEXTER, Bloomington Sccfctary— » JAS/A STONE, Rt, 4, Springfield Treasuf ef — " CHAS, BECKER, Pleasant Plains i). i/' t.^ :hy u"^^ V, 4- , , U j^Jn, L LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. Office of the Secretary. ) R.R. 4, Springfield, Ii,i,., Jan. 25, 1905 f 7b his Excellency, Charles S. Deneen, Governor of the State of Illinois: Sir :, I have the honor to transmit herewith the Fourth Annual Report of the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Associa- tion. Respectfully submitted, Ji^MES A. Stone, Secretary. 414434 ►0 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT LIST OF MEMBERS OP THE Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association FOR 1905. Achard, Chas. B., Roselle, 111. Adler, L. A. Jr., St. Jacob, III. Almond Bros., Libertyville, 111. Anderson^ J. L., Harvard, 111. Austin, C. E., 369 63d St., Chicago, 111. Abbott, Rev. E. T., St. Jo-seph; Mo. Allison, A. P., Maquoketa, Iowa. Arnd, H. M., 141 Ontario St., Chicago, 111. Baldwin, A. Y., DeKalb, 111. Becker, Chas., Pleasant Plains, 111. Bevier, M., Bradford, 111. Black, S. N., Clayton, 111. Blunier, Peter, Roanoke, 111. Bolt, R., R: R. 3, Fulton, 111. Bowen, J. W., Jacksonville, 111. Boyden, L. W., 144 Erie St., Chicago, III. Bronell, Mrs. Dora, Piano, 111. Brunner, Fred, Coal City, 111. Burcham, Chas., Mechanicsburg, 111. Baldwin, A. G., DeKalb, 111. Ball, W. D., South Bend, Ind. Barkemeyer, B. D., Oak Park, 111. Bartz, A. C. F., Keystone, Wis. Beardsley, E. H., Chicago Lawn, Chicago, 111. Beck, Baptist, Guttenberg, Iowa. Black, S. H., Goodhope, 111. Blume, W. B., Norwood, 111. Bodenschatz, Adam, Lemont, III. Brouillette, J. B., St. Anne, 111. Bell, John C, Valparaiso, Ind. Bumgardner, J. M., Clinton, Ind. Burnett, R. A., 199 S. Water St., Chicago, 111. Campbell, John F., S3 River St., Chicago, 111. Coppin, Aaron, Wenona, 111. Cremers, L. H., E. Dubuque, 111. Crim, S. T., Dawson, III. Crum, Isaac D., Palmyra, 111. Candler, Miss M., Cassville, Wis. Chapman, W. B., 7540 Union Ave., Chicago, 111. Colburn, R. J.. 6827 Union Ave., Chicago, 111. gTATfi BEE-KEEPERS^ ASSOCIATION. Conrad, J. D., Flanagan, 111. Dowdy, John S., Atlanta, 111. Dufif, H. J., Sheridan, 111. DittmerrjGus., Augusta, Wis. Duby, H- S., St. Anne, 111. Duncan, Wm., Hinsdale, 111. Dunlop, Dave S., Greencastle, Ind. Earnest, D. P., Comstock, 111. Emigh, Dr. B. T., Aurora, 111. Eaton, Dr. E. N., 315 Dearborn St., Chicago, 111. Elliott, Mrs. R. P., Wilmington, 111. Exo, George, Muscatine, Iowa. Fleisher, H. A., Kasbeer, 111. France, N. E., Platteville. Wis. Frank, J. C, Davis, 111. Frike, Fred J., Elgin, 111. Ferguson, L. R., Harvey, Hi. Fluegge, Theodore, Bensenville, 111. Frank, JoItn C, Earlville, 111. Gamash, Jas\ Waukegan, HI. Gehrke, H. K), Arlington Heights, 111. Glasser, Wm., Dakota, 111. Gray, W. H., Wyoming, 111. Gilbert, L. M., Naperville, 111. Glessner, Mrs. J. J., 1800 Prairie Ave., Chicago, 111. Hagler, H. T., Virden, 111. Haise, Chas., Atlanta, 111. Heinold, Fred, Cissna Park, 111. Hinderer, Frank, Frederick, 111. Hoke, J. H., Decatur, 111. - Holdener, J. D., Carlyle, 111. Hall, B. C, Elmwood, 111. Heintz, Simon, Palmyra, Wis, Hiestand, N. A., Pullman, Chicago, 111. Hogge, T. E., 129 N. Trumbull Ave., Chicago, 111. Horstmann, Wm. H., 6759 Morgan St., Chicago, 111. Hubbard, Jno. B., Shipshervana, Ind. Hyde, W. H., New Canton, 111. Jones, Geo. W., West Bend, Wis. Karns, Allan A., Dawson, 111. Kennedy, Miss L. C, Curran, 111. Kannenberg, C. F., Oak Park, 111. Kimmey, Fred L., Morgan Park, 111. Lawrence, W. G., Chadwick, 111. Leiker, Andrew, Joliet, 111. Lind, M. H., Baders, 111. Lyman, W. C, Downer's Grove, 111. Miller, Dr. C. C, Marengo, 111. Miller, A. J., Decatur, 111. Miller, W. C, Box R., Ottawa, 111. Mohr, Mike D., Hampton, 111. ' Moore, W. B., Altona, 111. Macklin, Chas. G., Morrison, 111. Marshall, Wm., DeKalb, 111. FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Martin, Jos. M., New Carlisle, Ind. McAllister, G. H., 2872 N. 46thCourt, Chicago, 111. McCain, Rev. Robt. B., Coal City, 111. Mottaz, A., Utica, 111. Muehleip, H., Apple River, 111. Mussing, Martin, Oak Park, III. - Nicholson, A. B., Lincoln, 111. ■ Null, W. D., LaHarpe, 111. • Nydegger, John, Danville, 111. / Oakes, Lapnes P., Metropolis, 111. * f Ostermeier, John, Cornland, 111. • Ohmert, Geo. A., Rockdale, lowA. • Ow^n, Chas., 536 Alma St., Austin, III. Payne, John W., Georgetown, 111. Poindexter, James, Bloomington, 111. Primm, J. W., Springfield, 111. Precise, H.- P., Chrisman, 111. t Parker, A. R., Morrison, 111. Pease, E. W., 2872 N. 45th Ave., Chicago, 111. Peftn, chas. M., Colfax, Iowa. Picaman, Gus., Litchfield, 111. • Raftery, J. T., ElDara, 111. ' ^ Rasenberg, Paul, Cable, 111. . Riley, W., Breeds, 111. Runlund, Peter, Spring Valley, 111. Ruse, F. M., Pittsfield, 111. Russler, Jacob, Morgan Park, 111. Reynolds, AlVah, Altona, 111. Reynolds, W. G., 1956 Ogden Ave., Chicago, 111. Kitscher, A. E., Meredosia, 111. Root, E. R., Medina, Ohio. Scott, W. C, Athens, 111. Scroggins, A. C, Mt. Pulaski, 111. Searl, J. E., Vermont, 111. Secor, W. G., Greenfield, 111. Seibold, Jacob, Homer, 111. Settle, W: H., Gridley, 111. . Slack, Geo. B., Mapleton, III. Smith, J. Q., Lincoln, 111. Smith, Louis, R. R. 2, Springfield, 111. Stone, Jas. A., R. R. 4, Springfield, 111... Switzer, Samuel, St. Charles, 111. Salzmann, Wm., Gushman, Wis. Schafer, E. F., Chesterton, Ind. Scheid, Byron, Bay City, Wis. Secor, Eugene, Forest City, Iowa. Shroutz, Mack, Momence, 111. Shupe, Frank, Mazon, 111. Snell, F. A., Milledgeville, 111. Stanley, Arthur, Dixon, 111. Stewart, W. H. H., Emerson, 111. Stow, Mrs. N. L., Evanston, 111. Sweet, Ernest, Garden Plain, 111. Swift, E. C, Ottawa, 111. STATE BEE-KEEPERS ASSOCIATION. > Switzer, Samuel-, St. Charles,- IlL . - Trego, S. F., SAyedona, IlL " / . Turner, Anderson, .Pleasant Plains, 111.. Tyler, Fred,' San Jose, 111. — ., ' ' Tough, James, Oak Park, IlL >;^ Ulrich, Q. E.,' Campus, 111. Vogel," Henry, Galena, 111. ;' Wagner, F. M., Quincy, IlL Weller, Miss Emma, Jacksonville, III. ' Werner, Louis, Edwardsville, IlL Williams, Edward P^ Urba'na, lU. " _; Wagner, L. E., Readstown, Wis. , Weckerle, Mrs. Anna, West Pullman,' 111 Weems, H. L., P. O. Box 267, Chicagp, III West, Ephraim, Minooka, IlL y- Wheeler, J. C, Oak Park, 111. Whitney, Wm. M., Lake Geneva, Wis. * Wilcox, F., Mauston, Wis. Wilson, Miss Emma, Marengo, 111. York, George W., 334-pearborn St., Chicago, 111. Zachgo, Hugo, Danforth, 111. ZoU, C, Vermont,_Ill. Zeller, .Caroline, Spring Bay, 111. Zeiman, Henry, Horicon, Wis. • . '■ State of Illinois— Department of State. . / ISAAC N. PEARSON, Secretary of State. , To all to whom these Presents shall come, Greeting: ^Whereas, A certificate duly signed and acknowledged having been filed in the office, of the Secretary of State on the 27th day of February, A. D. 1891, for the organization of 'the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association, under and m accdrdance with the provisions, of "An Act Concerning Cor- porations," approved April 18, 1872, and in force July 1, 1872, and all acts amendatory thereof, a copy of .which certificate is hereunto attached. Now, Therefore, I, Isaac N. Pearson, Secretary of State, of the State of Illinois, by virtue of the powers and duties vested in me by law, do hereby certify that the said. The Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association is a legally organized corporation under the laws of this State. In Testimony Whereof, I hereunto set my hand, and cause to be affixed the great seal of State. FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Done at the City of Springfield this 27th day of Feb- ruary, in the year of our Lord, one thousand [seal] eight hundred and ninety-one, and the Inde- pendence of the United States the one hundred and fifteenth. I. N. Pearson, Secretary of State. STATE OF ILLINOIS, SANGAMON COUNTY. SS. To Isaac N. Pearson, Secretary of State: We, the undersigned, Perry J. England, Jas. A. Stone and Albert N. Draper, citizens of the United States, propose to form a corporation under an act of the General Assembly of the 'State of Illinois, entitled, "An Act Concerning Cor- porations," approved April 18, 1872, and all acts amendatory thereof ; and for the purposes of such organizations, we hereby state as follows, to-wit: 1. The name of such corporation is. The Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association. 2. The object for which it is formed is, to promote the general interests of the pursuit of bee-culture. 3. The management of the aforesaid Association shall be vested in a board of three Directors who are to be elected annually. 4. The following persons are hereby selected as the Directors, to control and manage said corporation for the first year of its corporate existence, viz : Perry J. England, Jas. A. Stone and Albert N. Draper. 5. The location is in Springfield, in the County of Sangamon, State of Illinois. [Signed,] Perry J. England, Jas. a. Stone, Albert N. Draper. STATE OF ILLINOIS, county of SANGAMON. I, S. Mendenhall, a notary public in and for the county and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that on this 26th day of February, A. D. 1891, personally appeared before me. Perry J. England, James A. Stone and Albert N. Draper, to me personally known to be the same persons who executed the foregoing certificate, and severally acknowledged that they had executed the same for the purposes therein set forth. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year above written. S. Mendenhall, [seal] Notary Public. STATE BEE-KEEPERS ASSOCIATION. 9 CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS OF THE Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association. ■^CONSTITUTION** Adopted Feb; 26, 1891. ARTICLE I— Name. This organization shall be known as the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association, and its principal place of business shall be at Springfield, 111. ARTICLE 11— Object. Its object shall be to promote the general interests of the pursuit of Bee Culture. ARTICLE III— Membership. Section 1. Any person interested in Apiculture may be- come a member upon the payment to the Secretary of an annual fee of one dollar ($1.00). And any affiliating Asso- ciation, as a body, may become members on the payment of an aggregate fee of twenty-five cents (25c) per member. Sec. 2. Any persons may become honorary members by receiving a majority vote at any regular meeting. ARTICLE IV— 0^c(?rj. Section 1. The officers of this Association shall be Presi- dent, five Vice-Presidents, Secretary and Treasurer. Their terms of office shall be for one year, or until their successors are elected and qualified. Sec. 2. The President, Secretary and Treasurer shall constitute the Executive Committee. Sec. 3. Vacancies in office — ^by death, resignation or otherwise — shall be filled by the Executive Committee until the next annual meeting. ARTICLE Y— Amendments. This Constitution may be amended at any annual meet- ing by a two-thirds vote of all the members present — ^thirty days' notice having been given to each member of the Asso- ciation. tM'"'- -'-^ '». '■;': .-'.[l :-'"■' .. •' '.'"r :. v.. . :>.-/•,_;■.■ ;.; ^ i ' ■')'■- ■:.:;■■:■:)■■..:"■■■■■'■■'■-'- ■ ,. ■ : 10 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT ^' BY/LAWS '*# ARTICLE I. The oflficers of this Association shall be elected by ballot and by a majority vote. ARTICLE II. It shall be the duty of the President to call and preserve order at all meetings of this Association ; to call for all reports of officers and committees ; to put to vote all motions regularly seconded, to count the votes at all elections and declare the results ; to decide upon all questions of order ; and to deliver an address at each annual meeting. ARTICLE III. The Vice-Presidents shall be numbered respectively, First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth, and it shall be the duty of one of them in hi§ respective order to preside in the absence of the President. ARTICLE IV. Section 1. It shall be the duty of the Secretary to report all proceedings of the Association, and to record the same, when approved, in the Secretary's book; to conduct all cor- respondence of the Association, and to file and preserve all pa- pers belonging to the same ; to receive the annual dues and pay them over to the Treasurer, taking his receipt for the same ; to take and record the name and address of every member of the Association ; to cause the Constitution and By-Laws to be printed in appropriate form, and in such quantities as may be directed by the Executive Committee from time to time, and see that each member is provided with a copy thereof; to make out and publish annually, as far as prac- ticable, statistical table showing the number of colonies owned in the spring and fall, and the amount of honey and wax produced by each member, together with such other in- formation as may be deemed important, or be directed by the Executive Committee ; and to give notice of all meetings of the Association in the leading- papers of the State and in the bee journals at least four weeks prior to the time of such meeting. !Sec. 2. The Secretary shall be allowed a reasonable compensation for his services, and to appoint an assistant Secretary if deemed necessary. ARTICLE V. It shall be the duty of the Treasurer to take charge of all funds of the Association, and to pay them out upon the STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 11 order of the Executive Committee, taking a receipt for the same; and to render a report of all receipts and expendi- tures at each annual meeting. ARTICLE VI. It shall be the duty of the Executive Committee to select subjects for discussion and appoint members to deliver ad- dresses or read essays, and to transact all interim business. . ARTICLE VIL The meetings of the Association shall be, as far as prac- ticable, governed by the following order of business : Call to order. Reading minutes of last meeting. President's address. Secretary's report. Treasurer's report. Reports of committees. • \ Unfinished business. Reception of members and collection. Miscellaneous business. Election and installation of officers. Discussion. Adjournment. ARTICLE VIIL These By-Laws may be amended by a two-thirds vote of all the members present at any annual meeting. C. E. YocoM, Aaron Coppin, Geo. F. Robbins. 13 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT i Formation of the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association. ' ISpringfield, III., Feb. 26, 1891. The Capitol Bee-Keepers' Association was called to order by President P. J. England. Previous notice having been given that an effort would be made to form a State Association, and there being present bee-keepers from different parts of the State, by motion, a recess was taken in order to form such an Association. P. J. England was chosen temporary chairman, and C. E. Yocom temporary secretary. On motion, the Chair appointed Thos. G. Newman, C. P. Dadant and Hon. J. M. Hambaugh a committee on constitution. Col. Chas. F. Mills addressed the meeting on the needs of a State Association, and stated that it was his opinion that the bee-keepers should have a liberal appropriation for a State Apiarian Exhibit at the World's Columbian Exposition. A motion to adjourn till 1:30 P. M. prevailed. AFTERNOON SESSION. The Committee on Constitution reported a form for same, which, on motion, was read by the Secretary, by sections serially. Geo. F. Robbins moved to substitute the word shall for may in the last clause of Section 1, Article III. This led to a very animated discussion, and the motion was lost. J. A. Stone moved to amend the above-named section by striking out the word ladies and all that followed of the same section, which motion led to further discussion and mo- tion finally prevailed. 'Section 3, Article III, relating to a quorum, was, on motion, entirely stricken out. Mr. Robbins moved to amend Article V by adding the words, "Thirty days' notice having been given to each mem- ber." Prevailed. % Thos. G. Newman moved to adopt the Constitution, so amended, as a whole. Which- motion prevailed. See Constitution, page 8. J. A. Stone moved that the Chair appoint a nominating committee of three on permanent organization. Prevailed. Chair appointed as such committee. Col. Chas. F. Mills, Hon. J. M. Hambaugh, and C. P. Dadant. Committee retired and in a few minutes returned, sub- mitting the following named persons as candidates for their respective offices: - r For President — P. J. England, Fancy Prairie. For Vice-Presidents — Mrs. L. Harrison, Peoria; C. P. STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 13 Dadant, Hamilton; W. T. F. Petty, Pittsfield; Hon. J. M. Hambaugh, Soring; Dr. C. C. Miller, Marengo. Secretary — Jas. A. Stone, Bradfordton. Treasurer — ^A. N. Draper, Upper Alton. Mr. Black moved the adoption of the report of the committee on nominations. The motion prevailed, and the officers as named by the committee, were declared elected for the ensuing -"^ear. Hon. J. M. Hambaugh moved that Mr. Thos. G. New- man, Editor American Bee Journal, of Chicago, be made the first honorary member of the Association. Prevailed. At this point Col. Chas. F. Mills, said, "Mr. Chairman, I want to be the first one to pay my dollar for membership," at the same time suiting his actions to his words, and others followed his example, as follows: CHARTER MEMBERS. Col. Chas. F. Mills, Springfield. Hon. J. M. Hambaugh, Spring. Hon. J. S. Lyman, Farmingdale. C. P. Dadant, Hamilton. Chas. Dadant, Hamilton. A. N. Draper, Upper Alton. S. N. Black, Clayton. Aaron Coppin, Wenona. Geo. F. Robbins, Mechanicsb'g. J. W. Yocom, Williamsville. Thos. S. Wallace, Clayton. A. J. England. Fancy Prairie. P. J. England, Fancy Prairie. C. E. Yocom, Sherman. Jas. A. Stone, Bradfordton. • FIRST HONORARY MEMBER. ' Thos. G. Newman, Editor American Bee Journal, Chicago. -. i 14 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Bee^Kccpers' Association^ Preamble. § 1. For expenses of an- nual meetings, per an- num, $1,200; officers to receive no salary. § 2. How drawn. § 3. Duty of Treasurer of Association. (Asked for in the 44th General Assembly.} A BILL For an act making an appropriation for the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association. Whereas, The members of the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association have for years given much time and labor without compensation in the endeavor to promote the interests of the bee-keepers of the State; and, Whereas, The importance of the industry to the farmers and fruit growers of the State warrants the expenditure of a reasonable sum for the holding of annual meetings, the pub- lication of reports and papers containing practical information concerning bee-keeping, therefore to sustain the same and enable this organization to defray the expenses of annual meetings, publishing reports, suppressing foul brood among bees in the State, and promote the industry in Illinois : Section 1. Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois represented in the General Assembly: That there be and is hereby appropriated for the use of the Illinois 'State Bee-Keepers' Association the sum of $1,200 per annum, for the years 1905 and 1906. For the purpose of advancing the growth and developing the interests of the bee-keepers of Illi- nois, said sum to be expended under the direction of the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association for the purpose of paying the expenses of holding annual meetings, publishing the proceedings of said meetings, suppressing foul brood among bees in Illinois, etc. Provided, however, That no officer or officers of the Illi- nois State Bee-Keepers' Association shall be entitled to receive ^ STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 15 any money compensation whatever, for any services rendered for the same out of this fund. Sec. 2. The lUinois State Bee-Keepers' Association shall appoint at each annual meeting a State inspector of apiaries for one year or till his successor is elected and qualified who may if necess-iry appoint his own assistants. Said inspector or inspectors shall when notified of the existence of the disease known as foal brood among apiaries, examine all such as are so reported and all others in the same locality and ascertain whether or not such disease exists, and if satisfied of its existence shall give the owner or person who has the care of such apiaries full instructions as to the manner of treating^ them. Within a reasonable time after making such examina- tions the inspector shall make another examination thereof, and if the condition of any of them is such as in his judg- ment renders it necessary he may burn all the colonies of bees and all the comb necessary to prevent the spread of the disease. The inspector shall make at the close, of each calendar year a report to the Governor and also to the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association stating the number of apiaries visited, the number of those diseased and treated, the number of colonies of bees destroyed and of the expenses incurred in the performance of his duty. Said inspector shall receive four dollars for each day actually and necessarily spent in the performance of his duties and be reimbursed the money ex- pended by him in the defraying his expenses ; provided that the total expenditures for such purposes shall not exceed seven hundred dollars per year. SALE OF DISEASED APIARY^ ETC. Sec. 3. Any owner of a diseased apiary, of honey made or taken from such an apiary, or appliance taken from such an apiary who shall sell, barter or give away any such apiary, honey or appliance, or bees from such an apiary, expose other bees to the danger of contracting such disease, or refuse to allow the inspector of apiaries to inspect such apiary, honey or appliances, shall be fined not less than fifty dollars, nor more than one hundred dollars or be imprisoned in the county jail not less than one month nor more than two months. Sec. 4. That on the order of the president, counter- signed by the secretary of the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association, and approved by the Governor, the Auditor of Public Accounts shall draw his warrant on the Treasurer of the State of Illinois in favor of the treasurer of the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association for the sum herein appro- priated. Sec. 5. It shall be the duty of the treasurer of the Illi- nois State Bee-Keepers' Association to pay out of said ap- propriation on itemized and receipted vouchers, such sums as may be authorized by vote of said organization on the order of the president, countersigned by the secretary and make annual report to the Governor of all such expenditures, as provided by law. -■>;;;'■■ ^ 16 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT A BILL For an act providing for the appointment of a State Inspector of Apiaries, and prescribing his powers and duties. Section 1. Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, represented in the General Assembly: That the Governor, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint a State Inspector of Apiaries, who shall hold his office for the term of two years and until his successor is appointed and qualified. Sec. 2. Said Inspector shall, whpn notified of the exis- tence of the disease known as foul brood among apiaries, examine all such as are so reported and all others in the same locality and ascertain whether or not such disease exists, and if satisfied of its existence, shall give the owner or the per- son who has the care of such apiaries full instructions as to the manner of treating them. In case the owner of a diseased apiary shall refuse to treat his bees or allow them to be treated as directed by the said Inspector, then the said In- spector may burn all the colonies and all the comb necessary to prevent the spread of the disease, provided, said Inspector shall, before burning, give one day's notice to the owner or other person who has the care of the colonies of bees and comb, that in his judgment should be burned. Sec. 3. The Inspector shall, on or before the second Monday of December in each calendar year, make a report to the Governor and also to the Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association stating the number of apiaries visited, the number of those diseased and treated, the number of colonies of bees destroyed, and of the expenses incurred in the performance of his duty. Sec. 4. Any owner of a diseased apiary or appliances taken therefrom, who shall sell, barter, or give away any such apiary, appliance, or bees from such apiary, expose other bees to the danger of contracting such disease, or refuse to allow the Inspector of Apiaries to inspect such apiary, or appliances, shall be fined not less than fifty dollars nor more than one hundred dollars. . STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 17 FOUL BROOD -AND— OTHER OI5BASBS OF BBBS. {Republished by permission of N. E. France, Foul Brood Inspector, of Wisconsin.) Foul brood — bacillus alvei — is a fatal and contagious dis- ease among bees, dreaded most of all by bee-keepers. The germs of disease are either given to young larval bee in its food when it hatches from the egg of the queen-bee, or it may be contagion from a diseased colony, or if the queen deposits eggs, or the w^orker-bees store .honey or pollen in such combs. If in any one of the above cases, the disease will soon appear, and the germs increase with great. rapidity, go- ing from one little cell to another, colony to colony of bees, and then to all the neighboring apiaries, thus soon leaving whole apiaries with only diseased combs to inoculate others. The Island of Syria in three years lost all of its great apiaries from foul brood. Dzierzon, in 1868, lost his entire apiary of 500 colonies. Cowan, the editor of the British Bee Jour- nal, recently wrote : "The only visible hindrance to the rapid expansion of the bee industry is the prevalence of foul brood, which is so rapidly spreading over the country as to make bee-keeping a hazardous occupation." Canada's foul brood inspector, in 1890 to 1892, reported 2,395 cases, and in a later report for 1893 to 1898, that 40 per cent of the colonies inspected were diseased. Cuba is one of the greatest honey-producing countries, and was lately re- ported to me by a Wisconsin bee-keeper who has been there,., and will soon return to Wisconsin: "So plentiful is foul brood in Cuba that I have known of large apiaries to dwindle out of existence from its ravages, and hundreds more are on the same road to sure and certain death. I myself took in 90 days in Cuba, 24,000 pounds of fine honey from 100 colonies, but where is that apiary and my other 150-colony apiary? Dead from foul brood." Cuba, in 1901, exported 4,795,600 pounds of honey, and 1,022,897 pounds of beeswax. Cuba at present has laws to suppress foul brood, and her inspector is doing all possible to stamp the same from the island. Even in Wisconsin, I know of several quite large piles of empty hives, where all the bees have died from foul brood; also many other apiaries where said disease had gotten a strong foothold. By the kindness of the Wisconsin bee-keep- 18 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT ers, and in most cases, by their willing assistance, I have, during the last five years, gotten several counties free of the disease, and at the present writing, March 12, 1902, have what there is in Wisconsin under control and quarantined. This dreadful disease is often imported into our State from other States and countries, so that we may expect some new cases to develop, until all the States shall enact such laws as will prevent further spread of the same. Arizona, New York (1899), California, (1891), Nebraska (1895), Utah (1892), Colorado (1897), have county inspectors, and Wis- consin (1897), and Michigan (1901), have State inspectors. The present Wisconsin law, after five years of testing and rapid decrease of the disease is considered the best, and many other States are now making efforts to secure a like law. There are several experimental apiaries in Canada under control of the Ontario Agricultural College, also a few in the United States, especially in Colorado, that have done great work for the bee-keeping industry, and their various pub- lished bulletins on the same are very valuable. The Wis- consin State Bee-Keepers' Association have asked that an experimental apiary might be had on the Wisconsin experi- mental farm, but at present there are so many departments asking for aid, that I fear it may be some time before bee- culture will be taken up. CAUSES OF FOUL BROOD. 1. Many writers claim foul brood originates from chilled or dead brood. Dr. Howard, of Texas, one of the best prac- tical modern scientific experimenters, a man of authority, has proved beyond doubt that chilled or common dead brood does not produce foul brood. I have, in the last five years, also proven his statement to be true in Wisconsin, but I do believe such conditions of dead brood are the most favorable places for lodgment and rapid growth of diseases. Also, I do not believe foul brood germs are floating in the air, for, if they were, why would not every brood-comb cell of an infected hive become diseased? I believe that this disease spreads only as the adult bees come in contact with it, which is often through robber-bees. Brood-combs should not be removed from any colony on cold or windy days, nor should they be left for a moment in the direct rays of sunshine on hot days. 2. The foul brood may be caused by the need of proper food and temperature. Generally this disease does not appear to be serious during a honey-flow, but at the close of the honey season, or at times of scarcity, it is quite serious, and as the bees at such times will rob anywhere they can find stores, whether from healthy or diseased combs, it is the duty of every bee-keeper to keep everything carefully protected. Hive-entrances contracted, no old combs or any article with a drop of honey in where the bees can get to it. While honey is coming in from the various flowers, quite a portion is used direct as food for the larval bee, and with such no disease STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 19 would be fed to the bees. Such fed bees, even in a dis- eased hive, will hatch, as is often the case. I never knew of a case where a bee hatched from a brood-cell that had ever had foul brood in. If the germs of disease are there in the dried scale attached to the lower side-walls, bees will store honey therein, the queen will deposit eggs, or the cell may be filled with pollen, or bee-bread, as some call it. Said honey or pollen, when it comes in contact with those germs of disease, or the food given the young bee, if in the proper temperature, said germs of disease will grow and develop rapidly. CAUSES BY CONTAGION. I fully believe if the history of foul brood in Wisconsin was known, nearly every case could be traced to contagion from diseased combs, honey, or from some diseased queen- breeder's cages. Here are some instances where I have traced the history of contagion in Wisconsin : 1. Diseased apiaries, also single colonies, sold either at auction or private sale. Several law-suits have resulted in the settlement of some of the cases. 2. Brood-combs and various implements from diseased hives, used by other bee-keepers, and borrowed articles. 3. All the bees in an apiary dead from foul brood, and the hives having an abundance of honey in the brood-combs, said combs placed out by the side of hives so that neighbors' bees might get the honey. From those combs I lined robber- bees to seven other apiaries, and each time became diseased and were treated. 4. iiobber-bees working on empty honey-packages in the back yards of grocery stores and baking factories. Said honey came from diseased apiaries, some located in far distant States, even Cuba. 5. Loaning of hives, comhs, extractors, and even empty honey-packages. 6. Buying honey from strangers, or not knowing where it was produced, and feeding it to bees without boiling the honey. 7. Too common a practice of using old brood-combs from some apiary where the owner's bees have died from "bad luck," as he calls it. 8. Queen-bee — by buying queen-bees from strangers and introducing her in the cages they came in. I have traced several new outbreaks of the disease to the hives where such queens were introduced, and the queens came from distant States. To be safe, on arrival of queen, put her carefully alone in a new and clean cage with good food in it. Keep her in there, warm and comfortable, for a few hours before introducing. The shipping cage and every bee that came with the queen should be put in the stove and burned. I do not think there is any danger from the queen so treated, even from diseased hives, but I do know of many cases where disease soon appeared in the hives where the shipping-cage and bees 20 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT were put in with the colony. The great danger is in the food in said cage being made from diseased honey. I was called to attend a State bee-keeper's meeting in another State and I asked if any there had had experience with foul brood. There was a goodly number of raised hands. Then I asked, "Do anyone of you think you got the disease by buying queen- bees?" Again several hands were raised. Even bee-keepers there had traced the disease in their apiaries to the buying of queens, and all from the same breeder. If you get queens from abroad, I hope you will do with her as I have above described. Better be on the safe side. EXPERIMENTS. 1. A prominent Wisconsin bee-keeper some years ago had foul brood among his bees so bad that he lost 200 colonies before the disease was checked. Having a honey extractor and "comb-foundation machine, he first boiled the hives in a la*ge sorghum pan, then in a kettle all combs were melted after the honey was extracted, the honey was boiled and also the extractor and implements used. The bees were returned to their hives on comb foundation he made from the wax made from the melted combs, then fed the boiled honey. Several years have passed and there has been no signs of disease in his apiary since. 2. Foul-brood germs are not always killed when exposed to a temperature of 213 deg. F. (boiling point) for 45 min- utes. But in every case where the combs are boiled in boiling water, and same were well stirred while boiling, no germs were alive. 3. Foul brood in brood-combs is not destroyed or killed when exposed to the temperature of Wisconsin winters of 20 deg. below zero, and in one case I developed foul brood from combs that had been exposed to 28 deg. below zero. 4. Honey, if stored in diseased combs, acts as a pre- serving medium, and in such cases the germs of disease will remain so long as the comb is undisturbed. Four years at least. 5. Honev or beeswax, or the refuse from a solar or sun- heat extractor, is not heated enough to kill foul-brood germs. Several cases of contagion where robber-bees worked on solar extractor refuse or honey. 6. Comb foundation made by supply manufacturers is free from live germs of disease and perfectly safe to use. To prove this experiment beyond doubt, I took a quantity of badly-diseased brood-combs from several apiaries, and ren- dered each batch of combs into wax myself on the farm where found. Then on my own foundation mill I made some brood foundation. I also took quite a quantity more of said wax, went to two wholesale comb foundation manufacturers, and both parties willingly made my experimental wax into comb foundation just the same as they do every batch of wax. I then divided the various makes of foundation and selected 20 of the best bee-yards in Wisconsin, where no disease had O STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 21 ever been known, had the same placed in 62 of their best colonies, and in every case no signs of disease have appeared. Those same colonies continue to be the best in the various apiaries. SYMPTOMS OF FOUL BROOD. 1. The infected colony is not liable to be as industrious. Hive-entrance with few guard-bees to protect their home. Sometimes fine dirt or little bits of old comb and dead bees in and around the hive-entrance, and often robber-bees seek- ing entrance. 2. Upon opening the hive, the brood in the combs is irregular, badly scattered, with many empty cells which need inspection. 3. The cappings over healthy brood is oval, smooth and of a healthy color peculiar to honey-bee brood, but if diseased the cappings are sunken, a little darker in color, and have ragged pin-holes. The dead larval bee is of a light color, and, as it is termed, ropy, so that if a toothpick is inserted and slowly withdrawn, this dead larva will draw out much like ' spittle or glue. 5. In this ropy stage there is more or less odor peculiar to the disease; it smells something like an old, stale glue- pot. A colony may be quite badly affected and not emit much odor, only upon opening of the hive or close examina- tion of the brood. I have treated a few cases where th£ foul brood odor was plainly noticed several rods from the apiary. 6. Dried Scales — If the disease has reached the advanced stages, all the above-described conditions will be easily seen and the dried scales as well. This foul matter is so tena- cious that the bees cannot remove it, so it dries down on the lower side-wall of the cell, midway from the bottom to front end of the cell, seldom on the bottom of a cell. According to its stage of development there will be either the shape- less mass of dark-brown matter, on the lower side of the cell, often with a wrinkled skin covering as if a fine thread had been inserted in the skin lengthwise and drawn enough , to form rib-like streaks on either side. Later on it becomes hardened, nearly black in color^ and in time dries down to be as thin as the side-walls of the cell. Often there will be a small dried bunch at the front end of the cell not larger than a part of common pin-head. To see it plainly, take the comb by the top-bar and hold it so that a good light falls into the cell at an angle of 75 degrees from the top of the comb, while your sight falls upon the cell at an angle of about 45 degrees. The scales, if present, will easily be seen as above described. This stage of disease in combs is easily seen and is always a sure guide or proof of foul brood. Such combs can never be used safely by the bees and must/ be either burned or carefully melted. Be sure not to mistake? such marked combs in the spring for those soiled with bee- dysentery. The latter have a somewhat similar appearance but are more or less surface-soiled, and will also be spotted or have streaked appearance by the dark-brown sticky ex- :?^Km 22 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT crements from the adult bees. Please examine closely this half-tone print, which I photographed from a diseased comb containing all Stages of foul brood. This comb came from the last living weak colony of a once large and profitable apiary. TREATMENT. "A bee-keeper who does not discover foul brood, before his nostrils remind him that there is something wrong with his bees, is not -the proper person to treat the case." Dr. Howard, in his valuable book on foul brood, states : "I regard the use of all drugs in the treatment of foul brood as a use- less waste of time and material, wholly ineffectual, inviting ruin and total loss of bees. Any method which has not for "^ its object the entire removal of all infectious material beyond the reach of both bees and brood will prove detrimental and destructive, and surely encourage the recurrence of the dis- ease." In Wisconsin I have tried many methods of treat- ment, and cured some cases with each method, but the one that never fails, if carefully followed, and that commends itself is . the McEvoy treatment. Canada's foul brood in- spector, has cured foul brood by the wholesale — thousands of cases. MCEVOY TREATMENT. "In the honey season when the bees are gathering honey freely, remove the combs in the evening and shake the bees into their own hives ; give them frames with comb-foundation starters and let them build comb for four days. The bees will make the starters into comb during the four days and store the diseased honey in them, which they took with them from the old comb. Then in the evening of the fourth day take out the new combs and give them comb foundation (full sheets) to work out, and then the cure will be com- plete. By this method of treatment all the diseased honey is removed ;from the bees before the full sheets of foundation are worked out. All the old foul-brood combs must be burned or carefully made into wax after they are removed from the hives, and all the new combs made out of the start- ers during the four days must be burned or made into wax, on account of the diseased honey that would be stored in them. All the curing or treating of diseased colonies should be done in the evening, so as- not to have any robbing done, or cause any of the bees from the diseased colonies to mix and ^o with the bees of healthy colonies. ' By doing all the work in the evening it gives the bees a chance to settle down nicely before morning, and then there is no confusion or trouble. This same method of curing colonies of foul brood can be car- ried on at any time from May to October, when the bees are not getting any honey, by feeding plenty of sugar syrup in the evenings to take the place of the honey-flow. It will start the bees robbing and spread the disease to work with foul brood colonies in warm days when the bees are not gathering STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 23 honey, and for that reason all work must be done in the evenings when no bees are flying. "When the diseased colonies are weak in bees, put the bees, two, three, or four colonies togetfier, so as to get a good-sized colony to start the cure with as it does not pay to spend time fussing with little, weak colonies. When the bees are not gathering honey, any apiary can be cured of foul brood by removing the diseased combs in the evening and giving the bees frames with comb-foundation starters on. Then also in the eyening feed the bees plenty of sugar syrup and they will draw out the foundation and store the diseased honey which they took with them from the old combs ; on the fourth evening remove the new combs made out of the starters and give the bees full sheets of comb foundation and feed plenty of sugar syrup each evening until every colony is in first-class order. Make the syrup out of granulated sugar, putting one pound of water to every pound of sugar, and bring it to a boil. As previously stated, all the old comb must be burned or made into wax and so must Jll new combs made during the four days. No colony is cured of foul brood by the use of any drug." A. I. Root, of Medina, Ohio, says : "The starvation plan in connection with burning the combs and frames and boiling the hives has worked the best in treating foul brood. It never appeared after such treatment, though it did in some cases where hives were honey-stained and not boiled, thus confirming the theory or fact of spores." All the difference from the McEvoy treatment that I practice is this : I dig a deep pit on level ground near the diseased apiary, and after getting a fire in the pit such dis- eased combs, frames, etc., as are to be burned are burned in this pit in the evening, and then the fresh earth from the pit returned to cover all from sight. Often I use some kerosene oil, a little at a time being poured on old brood-combs or those having much honey in, as they are hard to burn. If diseased combs with honey in are burned on the surface of the soil there is great danger; the honey when heated a little will run like water on the soil, and in the morning the robber- bees will be busy taking home the diseased honey that was not heated enough to kill germs of foul brood. I also cage the queen while the bees are on the five or six^strips of foundation. It helps to keep the colony from deserting the hive and going to ather colonies. R. L. Taylor, Michigan University experimental apiary, reports : "The plan that the colony be shaken out into another hive after being allowed to build comb for four days, I have proven in 100 cases to be unnecessary." In Wisconsin, I, too, have cured several cases by the one transferring, when honey was not coming in very freely, but it is better, and a great saving of time to both bees and owner, to exchange in three or four days those foundation starters, for full sheets of foundation. Diseased brood-combs, and those with honey in, if melted in a sun or solar extractor, (he wax, honey or residue is not hot enough to kill germs of 24 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT foul brood. This I have proven by several experiments. It must be boiled and well stirred while boiling to be safe. I do not believe in, or practice, burning any property, such as hives, bees, beeswax or honey that can be safely treated and saved. Many times it is poor economy to save all, and as so many bee-keepers are not so situated as to keep all s^diseased material from robber-bees while taking care of it, best and only safe way is to burn the diseased combs and frames. UTAH. Utah has county inspectors, and from one who has re- markable success I copy the report of his method of treat- ment : "Wherever found, it should be dealt with earnestly and with dispatch. If the colony is weak, I recommend smother- ing the bees, and in order to do this without letting a b^e escape, take a tablespoonful of sulphur and place it in the entrance of the hives, if there is any breeze, turn the hive so it will blow in the entrance. Then fire the sulphur and it wiU soon kill the' bees. This should be done early in the morning before any of the bees are flying, as one bee escap- ing .from the hive might carry the disease to any colony with which it may take up its abode. If the colony is a stroqg one, I would keep the entrance partly closed so as to prevent any other bees from getting in. Then as soon as fruit-blossoms come out so the bees can obtain honey I treat them. I pro- cure an empty box of any kind so it is clean, then find the queen, put her in a screen-wire cage which is easily made. Take a small piece of screen, roll it up and tie a string around either end, cork up one end, then place the queen and a few workers for company in the cage and place in the other end cork. Put same in this box and shake all the bees out of their hive into the box. This must be done in the evening when no bees ate flying. Keep the queen in this box 24 to 48 hours, allowing the bees to fly in and out as they please. Next take a clean hive with good, healthy combs or founda- tion and shake bees into it, letting the queen go and they will be free from disease. The old combs are melted into wax, bringing same to a good boil. Often washing with boiling water any hives or implements that might contain disease. Wherever strictly followed this has effected a cure."^C. Wil- cox, Emery Co., Utah. PICKLED- BROOD. Some seasons pickled brood is quite bad among bees, and in a few cases I have known it to reduce large colonies, even large aoiaries to doubtful hopes, but those same colonies, after I gave them treatment, were in a month free from all disease. Sometimes it takes as careful handling as if foul brood. I do not believe it is contagious, for all I have seen in 60 colonies in one apiary badly reduced by it. As an ex- periment one of my out-apiaries had 50 colonies at one time with pickled brood. I treated them and all were soon free y .-rr.' ?«p^';- STATE BEE-KEEPERS* ASSOCIATlO?f. 25 from dead brood. At the same time I took 10 of the worst brood-combs where at least two-thirds of the brood was dead, and placed those combs in other strong, healthy colonies. They at once cleaned out the dead brood and reared as nice brood as one could ask for. SYMPTOMS. The larval bees (in last of May and through June) show light-brown spots, a little later the cappings have small holes in — the cappings are not sunken or dark-colored as in foul brood. The dead bee will be at first swollen, with a black head, .dried to a hard bunch and often turned up — ^China- man-shoe like. The skin of the dead bee is quite tough, and, if punctured, the thin, watery fluid of the body will flow as free as water, often a little yellow or brownish-colored from the dissolved pollen from the abdomen of the bee. It has very little or no smell, does not at any time stick to the walls of the comb, is easily pulled out of the cell, is never ropy or sticky, and if the colony is properly cared for, the bees will take care of themselves. Plenty of liquid, unsealed honey and pollen near the brood, and hives so protected as to keep bees and br6od comfortable on cold days and nights. Never put bees on old black brood-combs, or those with dead brood in ; better make wax of the combs and give the bees full sheets of brood-comb foundation. TREATMENT. ' Keep all colonies strong, with plenty of unsealed honey near the brood, and if hives are properly sheltered so as to be warm on cold days and nights there will be little or no pickled brood. If the queen is old, shows weakness by put- ting several, eggs in one brood-cell and nursing several others,, so that the brood is patchy, I would kill such a queen, feed the bees a little,- and when queen-cells were started, remove them all and give them a queen and bees, between two of her own brood-combs from a hive where she has lived. I do not think pickled brood is often the fault of the queen, but rather a lack of proper food and heat in the hive. In most cases a shortage of liquid honey, or moldy pollen, even in hives with plenty of sealed honey in the outer combs. There is a time in spring in Wisconsin between dandelion and white clover bloom when there is no honey coming in from flowers and often cold days and nights so that the live bees consume the liquid unsealed honey first, and cluster in a compact body to keep warm, the result often is the larval bee just changed from the egg to a tender little grub, is either starved, half- fed or chilled so that it grows slowly and too often dies, and we first notice this about the time white clover honey begins to come in. In other parts of the State, where pickled brood appeared it was from the same cause, and at other dates, which was due to a difference of time of honey bloom. Wherever I fed daily some honey or even sugar syrup, and kept the hive warm, all dead brood soon disappeared ; ^ ,p 26 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT while in the same apiaries other colonies affected and not so treated, continued bad for some time, but got rid of it as soon as treated. Strong colonies of bees in the fall with a young laying queen, and an abundance of good honey sealed or capped by the bees, if properly cared for during winter whether in 'the cellar or in chaff hives, wintered out of doors in sheltered location, seldom have pickled brood, chilled or other dead brood, or dysentery, and are the colonies that give their owner profit. BLACK BROOD. Black brood is another fatal and contagions disease among bees, affecting the old bees as well as the brood. In 189S, 1899 and 1900 it destroyed several apiaries in New York. Last year I found one case of it in Wisconsin, which was quickly disposed of. Dr. Howard made more than a thousand microscopical examinations and found it to be a distinct form of bacteria. It is most active in sealed brood. The bees affected continue to grow until they reach the pupa stage, then turn black and die. At this stage there is a sour smell. No decomposition from putrefactive germs in pickled brood. In black brood the dark and rotten mass in time breaks down and settles to lower side-wall of the cell, is of a watery, granulated, syrupy fluid, jelly-like, is not ropy or sticky as in foul brood, and has a peculiar smell, resembling sour, rotten apples. Not even a house-fly will set a foot upon it. TREATMENT. Best time is during a honey-flow, and the modified Mc- Evoy plan, much as I have treated foul brood, by caging the queen five days, remove the foundation starters and give full sheets, keeping queen caged five days longer. As great care should be taken of diseased hives, combs, honey, etc, as in foul brood. DYSENTERY. Dysentery among bees in Wisconsin in the spring of the year, often is quite serious. Many colonies die with it. Dys- entery is the excrements of the old bees; it is of brownish color, quite sticky and very disagreeable-smelHiig, and is sometimes mistaken for foul brood. CAUSES. 1. Bees confined too long in the hives, so that they can no longer withhold their excrements, and are compelled to void the same on the other bees and combs. 2. Poor winter stores gathered in the fall from honey- dew, cider-mills, sorghum mills, rotten fruit, also some kinds of fall flowers. 3. Old and especially moldy pollen or bee-bread. 4. Hives too cold or damp. If moisture from the breath of the bees is not carried out of the hive by some means, such STATE BEE-KEEPERS* ASSOCIATION. . 21 as throueh a deep cushion of some kind over the bees that will absorb moisture and at the same time retain the heat, or by some means of ventilation, so that all is dry and comfortable. If mold forms on, the combs or cellar so damp as to form mold, there is gre^t danger the bees will have dysentery and die. \ TREATMENT. 1. First of alj, have an abundance of combs of sealed clover or basswo(xi honey in brood-frames carefully^ saved, and see that each colony is wintered on such food. Three or four such combs will winter a fair colony safely if con- fined on those combs late in the fall and the hive contracted to fit the same. This is one of the most important conditions for success in wintering. 2. If in the fall the bees have gathered this unwhole- some honey from the above-named sources, it should all be extracted and either exchanged for those honey-combs, or feed the bees good honey or sugar syrup until winter stores are secured. This should be done before cold weather in the fall. 3. Hives contracted and made comfortable, whether in cellar or outdoors. 4. If wintered in chaff hives outdoors with feed as above directed, and there come one or two warm spells during win- ter so that bees can have a cleansing flight, they will not have dysentery or dead brood, and will be much stronger when clover opens. If wintered in the cellar the bees will not need as much honey, and- if the winters are generally long with doubtful warm spells, the cellar will be best. But to keep the bees from dysentery, so often fatal to cellar-wintered bees, they should have such winter stores as above spoken of, then the cellar kept at a uniform temperature, about 42 deg. F., ven- tilated so the air is fresh, and no mold will form in the cellar. Fresh air-slacked lime on the bottom of the cellar may help if it is damp or has poor air. , 5.. Dysentery will not appear if bees a«^e kept on sugar syrup, or best-grade white clover or basswood honey, and are in a dry place, either sheltered by cellar or chaff-hive. FORMALDEHYDE EXPERIMENTS. Formaldehyde, by the medical experts, is now considered the best of all disinfectants ; I have great faith that we may yet learn its use, and save infected foul-broody combs. Mr. C. H. W. Weber has conducted some valuable experi- ments. !^rly in 1903 I decided to do some experimenting, having inspected several infected apiaries. We got a carpen- ter with well-seasoned lumber to make some perfectly air- tight boxes to hold brood-frames, two tiers deep, as per the photograph herewith. Mr. Weber's lamp was used in several trials. Where we used a greater amount, and longer confined than instructions caled for, the combs with all cells unsealed. 28 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT containing dried scales of foul brood, after fumigating and airing were placed in hives with bees on them. The chemical action was such that the bees at once cleaned them out, and no signs of disease has appeared in them since. But in those combs having honey or pollen in the infected cells, or those capped over with brood underneath, they were so covered that the gases did not destroy the disease, for those treated July 27, in 41 days each of those combs had foul brood again. To prove that the gases do not go through wax-cappings, I took some healthy hatching brood, fumigated it, then took it out and cut away the cappings, and some of the bees had life enough to crawl. I believe we should go slow and do careful experimenting. I know old, diseased combs are worth more rendered into wax, or those containing honey or pollen in infected combs ^re not safe to use again. A sheet of comb foundation is 'worth far more. I believe it is possible, if carefully done, to fumigate infected combs where there is nothing over the disease, so that those combs can be saved. Platteville, Wis., March 17, 'l 904. N. E. France. STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 29 RBPORT OF THE Illinois State Bee-Keepers' Association. The fourteenth annual session of the Illinois State Bee- keepers' Association was called to order at 10 a. m. Novem- ber 15, 1904, in the G. A. R. Hall at the Court House, in Springifield, Pres. Smith being in the chair. Mr. George W. York, of the American Bee Journal, of- fered the opening prayer. Membership dues were taken and badges were given. The report of the last meeting was not read, as it had been printed in the Third Annual Report of the Association. secretary's annual report. During the last year the work of the Secretary has been much greater than any year since our first and second annual Reports were published, as we have during the year pub- lished the Third Annual Report. We also made an effort to secure a larger membership, and, as you are aware, sent out (through the assistance of Mr. York), about one thousand letters, with a blank for mem- bership application for return, and were successful, in secur- ing 118 members ; and, we believe, had it been done before so many had sent their dues to the National, we would have doubled that number, as the $1.00 fee also gave them mem- bership in the National Association as well as in the State Association. We would suggest the same action for next year, and that it be done as early in the year as possible. For several years past the Treasury has been in debt to the Secretary, and it was not necessary to turn over what we did not have. It wastatised by voting the largest part of the fees received from members to the subscription for the Amer- ican Bee Journal. But last year we voted to give each mem- ber, a membership in the National also for the year, and with the increased amount going into the treasury, and the growth in membership, the treasury has paid up the Secretary and created a surplus besides. We did not make a report of the amount, as our book is here for the inspection of the Audit- ing Committee. At the last year's meeting one of the members present moved that all throw in and make up the amount due the Secretary, but the Secretary did not desire such a move, as- suring the members that he had faith that a gain would be made that would supply the deficiency. . 4^:^ 30 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT ' j Since we obtained our appropriation, and had the last Report to publish, the Secretary's work has been, as we said, very largely increased, and while the work for a number of years has been gratis, the last year the labor was such as to cover a good deal of valuable time in getting together the matter for the report, correspondence, etc. We have been sending 50 cents for each member to the National as fast as the fees came in, and, then, to be com- pelled to settle with the Treasurer for each of these small amounts, as some seem to think it no trouble to do, it would cause that much more extra time and postage, which is more than necessary. Jas. A. Stone_, Secretary. We have not made a written report but are ready to turn our book into the hands of the auditing committee, or can in five minutes give the balance. Dr. Miller — You should give an account. Mr. York — I suggest that Mr. Stone make a financial re- port tomorrow morning. Pres. Smith — You might as well make it now and be through with it. The Treasurer's report was submitted; what shall we do with it? If there is no objection it will be filed. Mr. Bowen — I think as a matter of business both the Secretary's and Treasurer's reports should be made in detail. That is the better way to do; then at the end of the season there should be an auditing committee to see that they are correct. We cannot keep them too correct. The best thing is to make a written report and submit it to the committee, and let them audit the accounts. I speak as a matter of busi- ness. Pres. Smith — Your remarks are well taken. Mr. Stone — I can present my book for a committee and they can see it. Mr. Bowen — Let Mr. Stone make his report tomorrow morning, and then, if necessary, report that to an auditing committee. None so perfect that we don't sometimes make mistakes. While our Secretary may be absolutely correct, it may have something not correct; we want to fix it so there will be no misunderstanding hereafter. I think it best that every man's account should be audited, no matter how cor- rect it may be. I will suggest that they be allowed till to- morrow morning to make their reports. Pres. 'Smith — ^We will report that tomorrow morning. Mr. Becker — I did not bring the voucher for the amounts ; if necessary I can go and get them. They would be all right where we have an auditing committee to audit the accounts. As far as the Secretary and Treasurer are concerned, as Mr. Stone said, we did not have money enough a year ago to need a Treasurer, consequently v/e did not need a committee to audit the accounts. Now, of course, we have a Treasurer, and last year, from the State appropriation, we paid out and had to report to the Gcfvemor, twice a year, March 1 and October 1. Pr, Miller — Did I understand you to make a motion? ^- STATE BEE-KEEPERS ASSOCIATIOl^. 31 Mr. Becker — No, we will just continue till tomorrow morning. Mr. Black — We received money from the State; we know the people are suspicious, and if we get this we believe it is for our good, and we ought to be able to show a clean balance sheet so that if anyone inquires where that money went we can show it, and we should keep our accounts in good shape. Dr. Miller — The reports should be itemized as far as pos- sible. President J. Q. Smith. Mr. York — So if the State Legislature wishes to examine it we ought to let them see it. It is right that they should know where the money went. If they see where that money went they will not object to giving more. The treasurer can copy that in the report. Dr. Miller — If I were the Secretary or Treasurer, I should demand that the accounts be audited, and put them out of the possibility of anyone throwing stones. The best tiling to do is to make an impression on the State officers, so far as that report is concerned. Say there is so much money paid to Mr. Moore, so much to the State inspectors. Take, for illustration, Mr. 'Smith. Some one might say, "I don't be- 33 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT lieve he did the work; I beUeve he went on a drunk and spent that money, and then put it in his bill." What assur- ance have we that the money was paid out? It looks a very difficult thing to get down in black and white so as to tell what it went for. How are you going to know how he spent that money, whether or not on a drunken spree? I confess it looks difficult to me. Mr. Stone — There is an Association in this county that asked us to be their Treasurer. We said we will be Treasur- er if the President and the Secretary will sign the checks with us, not leaving any possibility of making mistakes. It is the same here. The law provides that for every dollar paid out the President and Secretary shall sign the voucher. When the checks come back we don't have a thing to do but look them over and see if our signature is there. The only trouble that can possibly come up is that the President is also Inspector. It makes it possible for him to sign the order that is given to himself, but still the other two have to sign. We are not going to elect a man to fill the two offices, if we do not trust him. Mr. York — I could have said there were 2,500 copies of the Report, that would give some idea what I could have done with that money. Everything should be itemized. Mr. Becker — I have all the bills at home in a book, and could produce them. I did not think it necessary to carry on this report how many days inspecting was done, and how many copies were published. I did not think it necessary, but I have the bills at home. Mr. Bowen — I think Mr. York is mistaken as to that bill having been sent to the Secretary. The Secretary should submit that bill. The Treasurer is not supposed to know anything about that at all, all he has to do is to pay it on the Secretary's advice that the account is correct. He finds the bill submitted and approved, he finds the items are wrong, then those things should tally up. The Treasurer should make a report and have an itemized account of everything. The business part is to submit your bills to the Treasurer or Secretary and let them pass them to the Auditing Commit- tee, and after that let them sign a warrant on the Secretary or Treasurer. Then you have the whole business. Mr. Black — The business man should understand that if we expect to get any money we must go at it in a business manner. The Secretary — Why all this discussion? When our Re- port comes out in print, and, before the legislature, some member will say : "Why, they have been misappropriating the funds we gave them — their accounts are all tangled up. The Treasurer has no vouchers to show what he has paid out. The Secretary has made no report of the money he has handled, and the State Inspector went off on a drunk, and misspent the money," etc. When the whole truth is, vouch- ers for every dollar and cent that have been paid out have passed through the President's and Secretary's hands, been signed by them, and now are in the hands of the Treasurer, STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 33 where the law says they must be, and he will have them here in the morning, to place in the hands of the Auditing Committee. And the Secretary, though he did not report the funds he handled, has placed his book and whole ac- counts in the hands of the Auditing Committee, and they are so simple and complete that a balance can be struck in two minutes; but on account of membership fees coming in at all times of the year, no report could be made till the last moment, when you can plainly see how much (?) time the Secretary has had to spare. And further, the Treasurer has made his reports to the Governor, • as the law requires he should do. Pres. Smith — Don't any one think we are criticising them at all; we are just getting them fixed up for the future. They can submit those bills and get things itemized. Dr. Miller — I did not say our President was on a drunk, positively! I don't think so at all. Pres. Smith — Any further remarks? I believe the time is too short to read any papers ; any suggestion any members have will be considered. Mr. Becker — I believe the committee ought to be here at Springfield to audit their accounts. Were Mr. York to send ■ in his bill to the Secretary, and you of the Auditing Com- mittee live at Quincy, and at Decatur, why, it would be an expense to come here and audit his accounts. Why not take them before a Notary Public and swear to them ? I think that would be all that is necessary, then at the end of the year have an Auditing Committee audit these books. But I don't believe it would be the proper thing to put before an Audit- ing Committee when the Secretary could do the work. Make an affidavit to it, sending a bill with it, so much for so many days' inspecting, and so much expense for other things. Pres. Smith — The same way with other things, printed matter, postage, mailing. Itemize all bills. I don't think it necessary to bring them up. Pres. Smith — I think it might be a good idea to appoint an Auditing Committee at the beginning of the session to go over and report the necessary business. Mr. York — The law provides that an executive commit- tee can audit all payments. The executive committee shall approve all bills ; that is provided in the law. I think we should have an auditing committee appointed the first ses- sion and report the next day. Mr. Bowen — I say that bills should be submitted to the executive ■ committee hereafter whether they are in the in- sane asylum or where they are. Mr. Becker — I believe that if we are to ask for an ap- propriation before the next Legislature we ought to get our accounts in as good a shape as possible. I am Treasurer, and I move that the chairman appoint a committee of three to audit the books, and report at 8 o'clock tomorrow morning. [Motion seconded and carried.] Pres. 'Smith — He practically said he would appoint the committee. What business has the State with the accounts V.ii/ts;i;iV:i>.Wv>^i^- L-'£-. '?.-:Va.:^: Z,;^:^ .^^^-:l::-^^^ i\>-^Jr1*' 34 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT of this bee-keepers' convention aside from the appropria- tion? I don't care where my account goes, just so it goes to the Treasurer of the accounts. I have only one account, that is the appropriation from the State of IlHnois. Your Secretary and President drawing accounts audit them ; no individual member has anything to do with us. Mr. Stone — I let every member of this Association see my book. I don't want it understood that I want to keep anything back. The auditing committee has a right to have it. But as our President says, our Auditing Committee has nothing to do with the appropriation except as our Execu- tive Committee consent, that is the State Auditor's business. Pres. Smith — The hour for adjournment has arrived. Mr. Stone — We ought to mention whether or not we are going to have a night session. This hall is engaged for an- other committee. We can get a room in the State House or a room in the hotel. Pres. Smith — We can decide that this afternoon. Mr. Stone — We ought to decide it now, so we can speak to the janitor. Motion made and seconded that there be a night session, and motion lost. Adjourned. FIRST DAY — Afternoon Session. Vice- Pres. Black in the chair. The meeting was opened by a song by Dr. Miller and Mr. York. Mr. Bowen — What objection is there to having a paper read now? Mr. Black — None at all. Secretary Stone then read the following paper by C. P. Dadant, of Hancock county, on CO-OPERATION AMONG BEE-KEEPERS . Your invitation to me to attend our annual State Bee-Keep- ers' meeting and deliver an address has been duly received, and I would gladly comply with your request were it not that the date conflicts with that of another congress — ^the Upper Mississippi River Improvement Association — ^which is of very great interest to the cities along the big river, and for which I am delegated by our city. I trust that, in view of the importance of the matter, our bee-keepers will excuse my absence. I believe that the most important matter before the bee- keepers of the country at the present time is the matter of cooperation. The methods of bee-culture have been so im- proved in the past 50 years as to make the production of honey an easy matter for all practical men. The old fogy bee-keeper and the "gum" have been relegated to the back- ground. The moth-trap has been put away with the spin- STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 35 iiing-wheel of our grandmothers, and neither of them is brought to Hght, except as a rehc of the past. The essential questions today are: How to market our honey, and how to protect ourselves against damage, either through the con- tagious disease, foul brood, or through the ignorance or dis- • honesty of those who oppose our interests? The comb- honey manufacture s^arns, the spraying of fruit-trees in bloom, the prejudice against bees because of the untrue accusation that bees damage flowers or injure sound fruit — all these and many others are to be warred against. To do it safely, we must unite. We hear on every side of the success of the great trusts which are formed in the manufacture of everything, and of the enormous profits derived by cooperation. The truth is, that association is the key-note to success today. I dare say that of those who will hear this paper read, there are, very few, if any, who do not belong to some association, for profit or comfort. The life insurance and fire insurance companies are nothing but trusts for our benefit. The secret societies, for mutual help — ^Masons, Odd Fellows, etc., are all in the direction of cooperation. Our bee associations, no matter how insignificant and weak they may be, are all evidences of the need of association for mutual information, and ultimate increased comfort. Some of our State associations have already secured some very positive benefits from association. A number of States have efficient foul-brood laws and foul-brood inspec- tors, who help keep down this disease, which is really the only disease that nature has put in our way. As bees in- crease in numbers throughout the country, the danger of epidemics increases, and therefore the precautions against all possibilities of disease should increase. When bee-keepers lived 25 miles apart, and bees existed only in the forests, an epi- demic was soon stopped, like a fire without fuel, by want of something to feed on. But since bees are becoming one of the institutions of the farm or of the suburban, garden, there is an increase of risk which must be warded off. I notice the same danger in other lines. A small vine- yard runs less risk of black-rot than a large one. A farm yard containing a couple pigs is in less danger from hog cholera than one containing a couple hundred. So, as we be- come more and more numerous there is more and more need of cooperation, to defend ourselves by mutual understanding and instruction. It is necessary to obtain laws in each State regulating the .control of foul brood, and sustaining the honest producer against the adulterator who tries to sell a manu- factured product as a product of the farm. There is also need to advertise our business so as to help the sales of a healthy and pure product; there is need of placing before the masses a very plain statement showing that the canards concerning the alleged manufacture of comb honey by machinery are all a fake. For these purposes, and for many others which do not come to my mind now, and JAa^S:^^^^£i^i^^kii^iij^!kiL,iiJii^^.:i^^Ji s'TtS' 3b FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT also for purposes of which we have no present adequate idea, it is absolutely necessary that we should unite — cooperate. The National Association, which a few years ago num- bered only as many members as met together each year at one selected spot in the United States, now numbers some- thing over two thousand members. Although this is a great increase, it is nothing compared to the possibilities of co- operation, whenever we convince our brother bee-keepers that it is to their interest to imite for the common good. Instead C. p. DADANT. of two thousand, we must have twenty thousand members. Each State must form a nucleus, sending its delegates to the meetings of the National congress, and the Association must sooner or later send its ramifications to every spot where bees are kept, in the length and breadth of the land. When this is done, our bee-keeoers will no longer go to their town groceries and ask them what prices thev pay for honey, but each will be posted from headquarters, and will go to the retailer with a statement something like this; STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 37 "Our sales headquarters state that the crop is short in such and such States; that the honey is expected to be in demand in such or such locahties; and that the prices, con- sidering prices of other sweets, may be expected to range about so much. Therefore I have placed the following prices on my honey." Let no one think that this is impossible. An impossible thing is to get a fancy price for your product, but there is not the shadow of a doubt that a plain understanding as to the resources and the demand will bring about the securing of fairly profitable prices. No one can produce anything at cost, or below cost, and keep it up. At present we have many friends who produce honey and sell it at less than the cost of production, because they are working individually with- out any information as to the value of their product. We may expect paying prices for our crop, if, when we put it on the market, we know just what to expect, and if we feel that there is a distributing point from which our surplus may be handled at the lowest possible cost. I know that some of our members may consider this as romance, but let me tell them that this romance is based on facts. We see thousands of plain evidences that an under- standing of conditions and an increase of facilities for dis- tribution is productive of great benefits to all. The cost of cooperation is insignificant, compared with the results. The only thing that may discourage some of those who hope for success is that large cooperative combines are not built up in one day. We must unite and stay imited until we succeed. It is not only in progressive America that the ideas of union are taking root. Even in our pursuit of bee-culture, we see this principle taking the lead a little more every day. The bee-papers of nearly all foreign countries are discussing association and cooperation. In Belgium, in France, there are some tangible steps taken. The October number of the Italian "L'Apicoltore" contains an address from Mr. Cap- poni, before the third National Congress of Bee-Keepers, on "Protection to the Bee-Industry," in which he urges his brother bee-keepers to unite, as "no great results can be ob- . tained if we do not act as 'viribus unitis' — united men." > The United States of America are a living example of what can be done by "united men." C. P. Dadant. Mr. Black — Any other papers? Mr. Stone — Mr. York has one from Mr. Moore. We will ask him to read it, but we will have it when Mr. France is here, as he has an address on the same subject. Mr. Primm — Mr. France is here now. Pres. Smith took the chair. Mr. Stone — He keeps pretty quiet. Let us have the paper. 38 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Mr. York then read a paper from Mr. Herman F. Moore, on STATE-INSPECTION OF APIARIES IN ILLINOIS. No more interesting occupation can be imagined than that of an inspector of apiaries. Early in the summer of 1904 the writer got his commission from Hon. J. Q. Smith, Inspector of Apiaries for Illinois. Soon after he started on his rounds among the Cook County bee-keepers. Quite a number were visited who kept bees in box-hives, and never saw the interior of a brood-nest from one year's end to another. Some of these said their bees had nearly all died out, that they had not done well, etc. Of course in such cases it might be necessary to break up a colony or two of the weakest live ones, to make a thorough examination, transferring the bees and combs to another hive. In the cases that I have in mind the parties were somewhat ignor- ant of our language and customs, and were entirely unwilling to have the hives touched, almost refusing to let me go into the back yard to have a look at the outside of the hives. Of course the colonies might be diseased, and the losses might have been caused by disease, but under the law as it stands, an inspector has no power to touch a hive for any purpose, without the consent of the owner, and the disease continues to spread in all directions from an infected apiary. By all means should ^the legislature be asked to give a drastic law, similar to the Wisconsin act. Otherwise it seems like wast- ing the money. In my work of inspection I pass the home and apiary of a near neighbor and friend. He is an old-timer, having kept from 100 colonies up and down for 20 years or so. I never supposed his bees had the disease until one day I made him a formal call, asking him how his bees were. His answer, "They have got it," expressed the situation. We spent some time that day, and another day I returned and we examined nearly the whole apiary, and found 4 out of 5 colonies had foul brood. His loss will be over $100.00 this season, by the disease. I questioned him as to where they could have gotten the infection. He named a party a mile away as the likely one. He said further that he had allowed the bees to clean out a honey-barrel that had been shipped in from Wisconsin. I visited the party named and found only the lady of the house at home. I told my errand. We went out to the col- onies, and found 3 dead and only 1 alive. The live one I opened without smoke, and found a few bees on three frames and brood on two frames. They were in the last stage of foul brood. Now, I should have had the power to burn up the whole outfit, except the hives, on the spot. I urgently re- quested the lady of the house to have them burned up at once, and she promised to have it done. My time was too short, and the ground too large to get over it the second time, so I don't know whether it was done or not. Now here is the condition that confronts us: The big State of ' Illinois has 102 counties, with about 350 apiaries STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 39 to the county. Suppose an inspector can reach 5 apiaries in a day, it would take 70 days to cover one county effectually. This does not seem far out of the way when you remember that second and third calls must be made, on a certain number of them. Seventy days to a county, 102 counties — 7140 days' time to inspect the State. Suppose each deputy could put in 6 months — May, June, July, August, September, October, and put in 25 days in each month, which would make 150 days for each inspector. It would take about 48 inspectors to cover the ground. Allow $5.50 a day for each inspector— $4.00 and $1.50 expenses. That makes $39,370 as the sum needed to cover Illinois properly in one season. The moral of this is that we must ask the legislature for $5,000 at the very least. In order to get the money we must show them what was done with the money already given us the past two years. We must make a report of work done and money expended. We must show why we need a new law, and why we need more money. This report must be in proper form and ad- dressed to the Governor and the legislative bodies. It must not be too voluminous, for they will not read and understand it if too many words are used. It seems fairly certain that we can get the largely-increased appropriation if the proper means are used. The Hon. H. W. Austin has consented to mtroduce our bill. You may remember that we would have had no law in 1903 without his aid. He recognizes the fact that even $5,000 is an insignificant sum to cover the great State of Illinois. It seems to be a fact that the aid of the Chicago-North- western Bee-Keepers' Association is. necessary to the success of this plan. Let us suggest that a clause be incorporated in the new law to give the control of the fund to a joint board composed of the executive committees of both associations equally. It seems as if under such an administration the largest constituency could be reached, and the greatest good done to the greatest number. The Chicago-Northwestern is looking forward to great things. Two thousand invitations have been mailed for the coming convention at Chicago, Nov. 30 and Dec. 1, 1904. If these two of the best associations in America join hands, there will be no limit to their usefulness. Herman F. Moore, Secretary of Chicago-Northwestern and Member of Illinois State. Mr. Smith (Mr. Smith took the chair) — Any further papers? Mr. Stone — We would like to hear from some one, and suggest that we call on Mr. France for a talk in the line of foul brood laws and foul brood inspection. Mr. Smith — Mr. France, if you would consent we would be glad to hear from you, Mr. France is foul brood inspector of Wisconsin. -'"'"jct;.s'^-wj-^.tj , 4A FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT A TALK ON FOUL BROOD AHONQ BEES. Mr. France — I am here to help j^ou in your legislative problem. Conditions are much different here, and I don't know how to approach the financial part. When I was sent by our Association to ask for our Bill, the first thing that confronted me was, "How many bee-keepers are there in the State?" I don't know. And we had to confess to the Legislative Committee we didn't know. "Give us an estim- ate. What does the bee-business amount to in your state, anyhow?" We had nothing to show, and they said, "What are you asking for money for, if you don't know your own business?" They moved indefinite postponement, and we were turned down for two years. Get facts ! Two years later we came again. Same problem on the start. "How many bee-keepers have you got in the State?" There are 10,500 bee-keepers who are voters and tax-payers, and who by their votes helped to send you here. They are the ones asking for their respective rights. Suppose you had all the honey for one year in your State put together, what would it amount to ? It would be 150 car-loads. K in 4 1-4 by 4 1-4 pound section boxes, and boxes touching, they would form a walk of comb honey from Madison to Milwaukee and back, or a distance of 150 miles. Then I took the State map and drew a line across it representing the valuation of the honey product, compared with other agricultural products. It became interesting, and at the close the committee report- ed in our favor. Another committee was to be heard from in a few days and we thought everything was nice, but, alas ! we met a new problem. When I went before the committee the Chairman was sick, and the temporary chairman was opposed to the Bill. He made light of it when the Bill was called up for consideration. He did not know whether it was bees, flies, bed-bugs or what, but said, "as the majority of the committee is here, I guess we can 'do this man up'." I was asking in behalf of the State organization of bee-keepers, delegated by them as a committee of one. I did not want to plead before that committee with this chairman opposed to it. After considerable time pleading to have its continuance they were going to move for indefinite postponement. My last dying chance. I said, "Gentlemen, if you vote on this Bill, I ask a copy of every man's ballot which way you vote. I, and the bee-keepers, who helped to send you here, want to know iiow every man on this committee stands." If you want to hit a politician ask him how he votes. I went immediately from that committee room to the hotel, and from a list of the Wisconsin bee-keepers I wrote to all tlic bee-keepers in the county from the district, of the temporary chairman who was opposed to the Bill. When I went back the next week the chairman was there with the temporary chairman, and he said, "France, did you ever go to a revival meeting?" "Yes, sir." Well, I am converted. Hew did you get all the bee-keepers of my county down to STATE BEE-KEEPERS ASSOCIATION. 41 the depot Friday night? We will support everything you bee-keepers ask for." Why did he oppose the bill before? Because not a bee- keeper had said a thing to him about it, and he was oppos- ing everything asked for a State appropriation, till*he knew it was just and right. You may leave it to a committee to do the work, but you will have to do your part. There will a time come when it will need every individual effort. Inspector N. E. France. As to the amount of the appropriation for Illinois, I am sure that this will be asked: What have you done with the appropriation already given? What have you accomplished with it? You will report the power and authority of your inspector lacking. While I was in St. Louis, in September, 1904, I visited an apiary in that city, and found infected col- onies contracted from this State. Now that ought not to be the case. Bees in Illinois have become infected, and it is in- fecting bees in other States. «.;*?^c^3. :^*' 42 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT I hope you will have as good a law as Missouri will have by next spring, but your inspector must have authority. I went to an apiary and when the man found they were in- fected he wrote for me to come at once. I said, "Are there any other bees near you?" There was another apiary in sight. "Well, let us go over there." I went over there and saw a young man just coming from the field. "Are these bees yours?" "Yes, sir." "May I look at them?" I said I was the State Inspector, sent there by order from the Governor, to see if the bees are healthy. "I don't care," he replied. I looked for something to burn in the smoker. Saw a straw- pile near and started to the straw-stack. I lighted the straw in my smoker and started to the hive. The boy looked on. Soon from some place nearby a man came and said, "Here what are you doing in here? You get out of here and leave the premises right quick." Well, it startled me. I said, "I beg your pardon, are these hives and bees yours?" "Yes sir." "You get off the premises !" "Under what conditions do you want me to leave? I am State Inspector of Bees." "I don't care; you get off right away." I simply turned to my Bulletin No. 2, and said, "Allow me to read you this page, and I will get off without any trouble :" "If anyone refuses to allow the Inspector of Apiaries to inspect such apiary when necessary, he shall become liable to a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $100, or be im- prisoned in the county jail not less than one month or more than two months." When I returned in a few days the man was in the gran- ary. They had sold a car-load of oats and were sacking them. When I got to the granary door a large dog met me and kept me from going further, and while I was petting the dog the man came to the door to see what the dog was barking about and, without speaking to me, called his sons, who were in the yard. I had been warned to take a marshal with me. I said, "I have the authority and power of sheriff ; I don't anticipate any trouble ; I will go around a long way before I will fight." I did not know what he meant by get- ting two big boys, but he said, "You help this man here sack oats ; that bee-inspector is here." He came down and pulled off his coat and I wondered what was coming. He said, "Mr. France, I owe you an apology. I was a little too fast the other day. Let us look at the bees." We looked over the- bees to his satisfaction and mine, did what was necessary to do, and then he took me to a train that I might go home, and asked me to come again, and stay over night. Now, without the power to inspect, your inspector is not in a condition to do much good. If Illinois inspectors were ordered off the premises they would have to go. If he were allowed to inspect and give instruc- tions on how to treat the bees, some people would promise that they would follow his instructions, but after he is gone they don't do it. You want your law changed. What would you do with your Health Commissioners at large, if they were .-L^' STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 43 not in a position to enforce the law? You need the author- ity, but the question is, how are you going to get it? By cooperation. Lock hands together by uniting all local asso- ciations in Illinois with the Illinois State Association; let us have a plan to work with for that purpose and get your needs. But one word of caution : Get your inspector well backed with authority. They changed our law in Wisconsin by a vote of 62 to 8 to grant our additional fund, from $500° to $700 per year. We have the capitol to rebuild and other bills to meet this winter. You know the conditions existing in your State, but the thing you must have this winter, is the backed authority of an inspector, and enough of them to cover the district. Too long a term of few officers won't accomplish work like an army of them on shorter terms. Wisconsin, Utah, California, Colorado, Nebraska and Minnesota are some of the States that have foul-brood laws. This winter I expect to go to Pennsylvania to aid them. They met at Harrisburg, Pa., Dec. G and 7. We need an inspector just as we need a State vetejinarian to look after the health of the farm-stock. I believe it is your right to have an inspector, and I believe you can get it if you ask for it. Do Illinois beek-keepers pay taxes on bees? All paying taxes on bees rise to your feet. (4.) Mr. Black — The assessor asked me, have you any bees, and how many colonies, but no valuation was placed on them, and whether they were assessed I don't know. Mr. Coppin — They have always left bees out for me. Dr. Miller — We are switching off the track. Go on Mr. France. Mr. France — The question they will ask is, "Are your bees assessed, and, if so, what is the assessed valuation?" There is a law in Utah that causes bees to be assessed, and one in New York and Iowa that forbids bees being taxed. I don't object to bees being assessed. For 27 years my home apiary was assessed. I was out when the assessor came last spring, and I asked him later how many colonies of bees did he put down. He hadn't put down any, and before I went to bed I followed him up and said, "Have you ,got my bees on the roll? Well, I want them there." He was sur- prised. Who ever heard of a man wanting more property on the assessment blank ! Well, I want them in ; put down 150 colonies in the liome yard, valuation at $1.50 per hive, about the average of where the receipts were running in our State. Now here is the point : The city bee-keepers have made more trouble in behalf of the law than all the rest com- bined. I remember a few years ago the tax-collector said, "France, you have 15 cents road tax to work out in this district." I would rather pay it than work it out. I would rather have bees mentioned on the assessor's books. If you want the good-will of your neighbors, be good to them, and you will find it will pay you to have the bees on the assess- ment blank, I went before the State Board asking that it 44 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT be put on the roll for this year. Whether they will do so or not, I don't know, but I will work for it all over the States. I believe it is just and right that bees be assessed, but if you begin to change the assessment roll there is a danger line. I believe it was in this State, four years ago, that the question was brought up before the Board of Asses- sors, and I was asked what we were doing in our State, and I said bees are assessable property and so is poultry. I be- lieve they are assessable, I don't know why they should not be, but don't fight on account of the few pennies the taxes amount to. It will help you. I tried in Wisconsin once to make the foul brood expenses self-supporting in this way: Have the State levy a tax of 2 cents on every colony as a reserve fund ; in other words, let the bee-tax support their own expense. The bee-keeper who was keeping over 50 colonies of bees wanted it passed, but the man who was trying to keep a few bees in old boxes was fighting it, and enough of those men responded to rule it out. I believe in Colorado that they are supported by a tax in that way. Dr. Miller — I admire the common sense of Mr. France, but I believe our law ought to be changed. Some time ago when we were trying to get the law, I was told that we had a foul brood law, and I quarreled over it a good deal and then had to back down and say we had none. But we can't change the law till we get the law. We had the appropria- tion but we had no law that compels the suppression of foul brood. Don't understand that I am undervaluing your taxes. It paves the way to ask for a law to prevent foul brood, and I am more thoroughly convinced in the belief that we need a foul brood law than I was before. If Mr. France was not backed with authority he would have been ordered away in more cases than he was. We need, and I am only saying it over again what Mr. France just said, if necessary to make it stronger, that we need that power to let a man go in and say, "I have a right to see if your bees have foul brood," and I want to see every bee-keeper and every ex- perienced man in America exceedingly anxious that there should be a law for the suppression of foul brood, because I don't want the disease in my bees and I want the law to prevent its coming. It is not the man alone who has foul brood that wants the law. He can cure it just as well with- out it. It is the man without it that needs the law. There has been too little feeling that we need that power. Now the Legislature has said that money should be used to sup- press foul brood. Now you can say. Will you give us money or help; we want you to say that the inspector has power, and till you give us that power we are seriously handicapped. Mr. Stone — As one of the members of the committee that got that appropriation I would like just to say what we have seen. Our chairman was along with us, and we failed twice in getting the appropriation, and the stumbling block was when a man gets up and says "personal liberty" in that committee;^ "You are infringing on my personal liberty." We heard that, and it was when we came to that clause where it [ -■ _ •- -'■ STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 45 gives us the authority to destroy the man's bees .if they have foul brood, that made us give up all hope of getting anything. We tried to get that law through with those con- ditions— to give the inspector all protection that the foul brood law could give him. The last bill with those authori- ties left out went through, but every man was for it and I suppose the influence brought to bear was what brought it through. The senator was pleased because he was flooded with letters he got. Go on Mr. France. Mr. France — I called there and what few bees he had were infected. I said shall I treat these? He was busy pick- ing apples one day and could not attend to it, so he put me off every day till I said my time is worth too much, and told him to build a fire under the kettle; we will cure them right now. But his time was worth too much, and in the other case the man's bees were in a dying condition. He said, "I will burn them up." So destroy in cases like that, ])ut generally it is not necessary. If it comes to the last I show them my authority ; and that goes a long way with sorrre people. If the State Veterinarian is on the farm and he finds a horse that is diseased, will he allow you to keep that horse? Can the man keep it as long as he wants it? I think the State Veterinarian would take care of jt. It is only the eradication of the disease that you are after. If I have a diseased horse or a cholera hog, the State places an appraised valuation and that animal is destroyed to eradicate the disease. Mr. Stone — I would like to ask Mr. France another question. When you have the authority given to you to inspect these apiaries, then would it not be sufficient to have a law that would compel them to eradicate the disease and not destroy the property? Then you would not be destroying property and no question of personal rights could come up. That is just what you need in your law. Mr. Smith — In my trips as inspector for this State I visited the past season, in 32 counties, that is about 1-3 of the State. I traveled over 2,000 miles, inspected something over 300 colonies of bees, and I will say that I found only one person who objected to having his bees inspected. But, on the other hand, I find the people willing and anxious to have them inspected. In a great many places I had corres- pondence with the bee-keepers that have foul brood, and they would notify their neighbors that the inspector was coming, and they are all anxious to know what they shall do in regard to treatment. I believe that by sending out the proper educational printed matter as to treatment, we would have a great deal of help. They have read the bee-papers of late years and they all say so much about foul brood that they are anxious to escape it if possible, and get rid of it if they have it. Mr. Stone — Did you not find the trouble with the people who had just a few colonies? Mr. Smith — That is the only trouble. About 18 years ago 1 had 102 colonies of bees in fine condition. Of course 46 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT I read the bee-papers. I thought I would get good queens and improve my stock, so I sent and got 6 queens. They were in queen-cages accompanied with J/^ dozen bees, and enough honey to carry them through their journey. I in- serted queen, bees, cage and all on the comb, and let the bees cut their way out, and before I knew it 82 of my colonies were infected v/ith foul brood. I found my bees were weak, and I began to investigate, and on investigation found it was foul brood. Then the next season a neighbor of mine con- cluded he would go into the bee-business. He went down *o this party and got 20 nuclei. I destroyed my bees, only having 7 colonies left. The next fall I built everything up even from the hives, then sent to this man and got 20 nuclei. He sent for me to come over and see his bees; they were not doing well, and I was enlightened then. We went through and found every colony infected with foul brood. We burnt them all up, and I supposed that they had been infected by some bees in the locality. Well, there were only a few liees in that locality that 3'^ear. The following year I went to that man again and got 60 more with the same result. There was a gentleman moved in from a farm near who sold some bees. I bought them all, black bees. I wrote to this party for queens, got 4, and successfully introduced them, yet in two months my bees were infected with foul brood. Now, then, there was a good indication that they were in- fected before they came here. It was three years before we got rid of that trouble in that neighborhood. I built up again, and have had no foul brood since, but everyone in Sangamon county is willing to do all possible to keep out foul brood. Mr. Becker — ^^Does foul brood exist all over the State of Illinois? If not, in what part of the State, and in what counties, does it exist? Mr. Smith — Well, it exists in the river country all the way, as I understand, from Cairo up to Galena ; up the Fox River through the northern part of the State, and down the Illinois river is where we find the most of it. I found some in Kankakee county. I believe the best way to do is to educate the people by sending printed matter to them and get them interested. Mr. Stone — When they know we have a foul brood in- spector they will be more liable to try to get rid of the foul brood. Mr. Smith — They mail me a piece of their brood-comb, and I tell them if it is foul brood. I think that we can do lots of work that way. Now, when we send out our report to Mr. York about it, I think it does as much good as the foul-brood inspector could do. We have now 119 members, and if all members will send in the name of every bee-keeper in their vicinity, we will mail them some more of this printed matter, an outline on how to treat the bees, as Mr. France illustrated ; I think we could prevent the disease. The bee- keepers that are bee-keepers are, as a rule, practical, and are getting more so every year, and those little fellows are iV!fe''.^.,-.r.^--SUt-.ii . li'LJ.;^^. V J-*i ..- ■4t^ W^^tiiiiaSt STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 47 gradually quitting; but I think it was in 1881 we had that great honey-flow in this State. I had 40 colonies that year and my bees stored 500 pounds of honey to a colony. Every- one kept bees the next year, not getting such results, but the practical men kept right at it; the little fellows quit. If I go to a sale in the country, and there are any bees, I buy them up. They sell cheap at sales in February or March. I buy them and transfer them, render up the wax, and if practical men would follow that we would soon get rid of little bee-keepers. If the people who want to keep -bees will take hold of this matter and help us, and by getting the people to work, I believe it will be better than to have a half- dozen inspectors. Mr. Becker — This is quite a bee-country. I believe there are 5,000 colonies of bees between here and up and down the river both sides in Mason and Cass counties. I went there last summer and met a man who takes a bee-paper, and had me come in to see him. He asked right away about this foul brood, what it was, and I had to explain it to him. I mef at least a dozen who had bees, and of course they all knew I kept bees and had exhibits at the Fair every year, and that I sometimes bought honey, and it seemed that every- one there was interested in foul brood. It is a good honey country, and has no foul brood. I said their bees were all right, and it seemed as if everyone in the country asked the same question. People have read about it. I believe that the money we have spent on these reports and pamphlets on foul bi'ood has done as much good as the inspectors themselves, because it is educating the people. The people keeping bees don't want any foul brood, and if they have honey-bees they don't want them to die from it. One doctor there, an old friend of mine, well up in the bee-business, has about 50 colonies and everything necessary to take care of them. I wanted to buy some of his honey. I could give him a good price a pound for it, but I could not use it at all. It was in such a shape; it was unfilled sections, so it was nothing but chunk honey, and I don't think in one case there was a straight section. Mr. York — According to the last census there are many bee-keepers in this State, and while these pamphlets are a good thing, unless you can get the names of the bee-keepers you can't reach them, and so far as I know we have only about 1,500 names of bee-keepers in this State. I don't doubt that the printed reports are good things. About the new law. I believe that if the things go right, we can have as good a law as Wisconsin has. I realize it will take some work to do it. I have not forgotten what we did two years ago to get the law we have now. I remember the Chicago-Northwestern Association had subscribed $100 to pay the expense. That was spent in endeavoring to get the law. I repeat, I believe that if things go right we can have as good a law as Wisconsin has. I know if we get this law it will cost some money, we cannot get it for nothing. We are in touch in Chicago with members of the Legislature, 48 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT many live in Chicago or near there. Mr. Moore and I are personally acquainted with some of those elected this year, and I don't know whether it is so or not but we have felt that you would not have gotten the other law had it not been for us up there. Mr. Moore spent a great deal of time and used his influence in every way, and he knows a great many members of the Legislature. I am satisfied that we can get $5,000 if we go for it. Secretary Jas. A. Stone. Mr. Bowen — I want to understand whether this money is approoriated for the suppression of foul brood. Is it not a benefit for Dr. Miller? Why is it not a benefit for the bee-keepers of Northern Illinois as well as Central Illinois? If we want an appropriation from the State Legislature we have to form a united front, and we have to show how many bee-keepers there are in the State. We have had an inspector here, and we ought to be able to tell in the report that we are bringing before the Legislature how many bees were in- fected with this disease, and how many apiaries were visited, ^il.^-fO: STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 49 SO that we cg.n go to the Legislature and show them that there is a cause for us to ask for this money for the Illinois bee-keeoers. Other States are trying the same thing, and I say again that whatever we do we must bring a united front if we get the appropriation. Our Chairman and In- spector spoke of one case where a party had a few colonies of bees that they objected to their being inspected, and the party moved to South Dakota. Now I am not in favor of giving to my neighbor a thing 1 don't want myself. If we had proper laws, that man's bees would have been inspected, and if they had the disease they would have been destroyed, and not gone over into South Dakota to spread the disease. What is good for Wisconsin is good for Illinois, and what is good for Illinois is good for South Dakota, and if we are going to work for the benefit of the bee-keepers we must be united, not in Illinois alone nor a part of Illinois but all over the whole country. Most of us are members of the National Association, and we must feel interested in all the countries. I know nothing about foul brood, and I hope I may not have it -among my bees, but I will try to keep other men from getting it in their bees. I am personally acquainted with some having foul brood, and I am heartily in favor of any law that will stamp it out. I should feel badly if I got it in my bees or in my neighbor's. Mr. York — If we can get an appropriation we can have more inspectors. I think if this Bill is presented right that we can get it. I don't see why we should not get as good a law as Wisconsin has. We ought to try to get in touch with the bee-keepers that don't take the bee-papers. If we can get the bee-keepers in the different parts of the State to send in the names of the bee-keepers in their locality a great deal of good will be accomplished. I think Mr. Moore has suggested that some of the money in tl^^^^^ynr should be taken to help get the new law. It seeng:^!P|||^Sfchat the Association ought to pay it, and not ask Mfei^^Kniembers to pay it. There are a great many peopiBlWH^aon't help it on at all. They want us to pay for it and do the work too. We ought to get a larger appropriation. Mr. Black — If there is an indication that any of this money is going to be used for that it will prevent us from getting anything. It will kill the whole thing, and I find that nothing kills a thing quicker than to get our hands into the State's pockets. If we want a law we must be willing to put our hands into our own pockets. I have spent several dollars in trying to get this law. Mr. Primm — It seems to me that as we have more than one Association in this State, we ought so to arrange matters that those members of one are also members of the other, so far as the law is concerned, and so far as effectual work is concerned. Membership in one organization should mean membership in all, so that we can work together in such a way as best to effect legislation, and for all concerned it would be a wise move. I don't know just how it could be formulated, but I think it would be wise. 50 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Mr. Coppin — It would pay us to stamp the disease out if it took all the money in the treasury. Mr. Smiths — We have till next Julv to work on it. Mr. Coppin — After working till next July there will be little money in the treasury. Mr. Stone — We ought to ask for a larger appropriation; I don't believe there was a single session at the State House during the Legislature that I attended, but what I was asked by the members trying to get the Bill through if the Bill cut in two would not be enough. We can not get along with less than $1,000. After the bill went through we expected the Governor would sign it by cutting it in two, as he did so many others. They asked if the Editor of the American Bee Journal was interested in getting that Bill through and we said "Yes." We ought to have a committee on legisla- tion, and have it both in the Chicago-Northwestern and in the State Associations. We don't care how much the Chi- cago-Northwestern gets; we believe they ought to have their proportion, but we have to advance cautiously whenever we find the money is not being spent rightly. If the Legislature finds the money is not being spent wisely they will quit giving it to us. Mr. Bowen — I am not supposed to know much about this convention, but I would like to know what Mr. York means by the Chicago-Northwestern Association and what territory it includes. Mr. York — It includes Illinois and all the States around it. Mr. Smith — In the last meeting of the Chicago-North- western held in Chicago, there were members present from seven States. Mr. BojjxJJ — Now if your money you speak of getting from the^^Mj^^Legislature is controlled in part by the Chi- cago-N(MJpRtem, does that not put it in the hands of other States t^flSictatft how much should be used if that society is composed 'O^*^ members from other States? I cannot see where the benefit would be in dividing it up. Dr. Miller — The idea in Mr. York's mind' is that the Chi- cago-Northwestern Association has done a lot of work, and spent quite a good deal of money in order to get this Bill passed — not that they ought to be paid for it, but that they have done this, and feel that they ought to be recognized on this ground aside from their bees.. Mr. Bowen — I am getting the run of it now. I want to state that your law provides for two annual meetings, and the expenses of meeting, but I don't know of a single penny being paid out for any expenses of the meeting. Now as to foul brood, if Northern Illinois has foul brood they are get- ting more benefit out of the law than we are. We have not got it in Central Illinois, but it is along the river counties. Dr. Miller — The inspector works in the Northern part of the State. You don't have the disease in this part of the country, and you are the ones that are getting the benefit of those in the Northern part of the State. The idea is not -,M.::~n:i!^M STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. ' 51 that the Northern part alone is getting the benefit. If the Legislature does not object to the horticultural society, I don't know why it should object to it on the part of the State Bee-Keepers' Association. Mr. York — It seems to me that a grant could be made to the Chicago-Northwestern Association, and you will notice that 2-3 of the report is from the Chicago-Northwestern this year, but they paid nothing for the report of that meeting. The State Bee-Keepers' Association is confined to operations within the State. The time is coming, and the sooner it comes the better, when we shall appeal to Congress through the National Bee-Keepers' Association, but so long as we work on the State Legislature for an appropriation for the work of the bee-keepers, we must give the appropriation to people operating inside and not outside of the State. The Chicago-Northwestern might be invited to suggest the names of persons who are members of the Legislature who shall I)e foul-brood inspectors, but if we are to secure an appro- priation that appropriation must be confined strictly within the State of Illinois, not outside, and if we want to affect the Legislature we must keep that in mind. Dr. Miller — I want our State Association to be success- ful. I would rather see the State society successful than the Chicago-Northwestern, but I don't believe the State Asso- ciation will be hurt by anything done by the Chicago-North- western. A Member — It was resolved not to hold the meeting in Chicago. Is there anything we can do toward getting the Legislature to grant* the appropriation? It certainly is for the good of this 'State? The Chicago-Northwestern has been one of the great supporters in getting the law. We must have a committee composed of members from that Associa- tion and this, and not divide the funds necessary to accom- plish the object. Take the money to use for the good of the State. I think there were 1,000 booklets printed last year to educate the bee-keepers. I could not get the names of the bee-keepers so I went to the members that I knew, and asked them to send me the names of all the bee-keepers in their part of the country, then when I got the list of names, I sent these booklets to them and said there is to be a bee- keepers' convention at Springfield, and you are invited to come. I sent out booklets on foul brood and some said, "I have it among my bees but I didn't know it before." Mr. Stone — I move we adjourn. Mr. Bowen — Before we adjourn I would like to have the President and Secretary get together and make their report. Mr. Smith — I saw a colony in St. Louis that was infected from this State. It was one of the strongest colonies in the apiary in the spring ; now they have contracted the disease. I will appoint a committee for the purpose of drawing to- morrow morning's resolutions asking for and trying to secure the co-operation of the bee-keepers throughout the State. Mr. Primm, Mr. York, and Dr. Miller will be appointed on ; i>,-.^.'. Wr, 53 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT that committee. If you prefer five, I will add two more. Any further business? If not we will adjourn. SECOND DAY— Morning Session. Mr. Smith, in the chair, asked the Secretary as to the next thing on the program. Mr. Stone — We wrote to eight persons for papers, but we only have two. Mr. Crim was one written to, and we never got any response. Mr. Poindexter has a paper. We have heard from Mr. Moore and Mr. Dadant, and the rest did not answer, so that is all we have in the way of papers. Mr. Black has a talk. Mr. Smith — Is there anything to dispose of, if not we will call on Mr. Black for a speech. Mr. Stone — A great many things ought to come up. Mr. Primm — We will have a report of the committee as soon as I can copy it. Mr. Stone — We ought to do something and have it un- derstood as to the publishing of this report; if it needs a motion, I would like to make it. I will leave it to the meet- ing and let someone else make a motion. We ought to make arrangements, and I favor their being made with Mr. York, the editor of the American Bee Journal, because he can ren- der us far more assistance than any other we can get to publish our '•eport. This past year when we were in doubt about the "modus operandi," through a correspondence with Mr. York we decided on getting out a letter and it was right in the busy part of the year with me, and I told Mr. York what we wanted, and asked him if he would write the letter. He wrote the letter and sent it to me for further suggestions, and we sent it out. You all know what that was, and no one but Mr. York could have helped us out as he did. We get the advantage of all that, if we have him publish our report, and I am in favor of having a letter like that sent out again. Now, if it needs any discussion and any motion to bring it before the house, it might be well to have a com- mittee appointed. What do you think about that. Dr. Miller? Dr. Miller — The Executive Committee will attend to that. Mr. Stone — Will it be best to leave the publishing of the report to the Executive Committee? Mr. Smith — Is the meeting willing? I don't know that it is necessary at all, but I think it best to put the motion. You have heard the motion : All in favor say, "Aye" ; con- trary, "No". It is unanimous. It will be left to the Execu- tive Committee. Mr. Stone — There is another thing I would like to have decided before we go any further. We have in the last year taken in five members who asked also for the American Bee Journal, in connection with their membership in the Asso- ciation, and I learn from the proper authorities that it is the understanding that when this Association gets member- ship in the National it means all the members. It does not .t^vi^'i^iljc:^: ' STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 53 leave any to go alone into the American Bee Journal family. Our foul brood inspector will have to be instructed as to what the rules are, as it was through that source that the American Bee Journal was ordered. Mr. Smith — We ought to decide that. We can not give membership in the Association and the Bee Journal at the same time. Mr. Stone — We did it with five members last year, and this year we have started with two. I will make up the difference if need be, with the understanding that no more : subscriptions are given. Mr. Becker — I don't see how we can compel any one to go into the National Association if he doesn't want to. I don't see how you can compel them to go into it. If any member wants to become a member and doesn't want to go into the National, I don't see how you can make him. Mr. Stone — It is his privilege. Mr. Becker — And it is his privilege to take the Bee Journal, and it is his privilege to be able to join and be- come a member of the Association. Dr. Miller — This privilege was given to all societies in the country to become members of the National Association, providing the local Association paid half the amount — .50 ' cents per member. You can't go into the National Asso- ciation for 50 cents without going into it through the State Association, or some other, as the National fee is $1.00. I doubt whether any individual would object to going into it. I don't need to go into the National if I don't want to. But I t' , doubt if any one will object to going into it when it costs but $1.00 for both the State and the National. Mr. York — A part of them go in but they have to pay $1.00 to go in. So, to get the advantage of the 50 cents mem- bership fee, the whole association has to go in. The regular dues, as Dr. Miller said, are $1.00. A provision was made in the National constitution for the purpose of increasing the membership of the National, and also to help the local asso- ciations that they might increase their membership. I never heard of any Association that refused to go in, and they vote whether they are to join in a body. Those of the mem- bers that want to join can send in their $1.00 to the National. But it will cost them $1.00, instead of 50 cents by going through the State Association. Mr. Smith — It would be a good idea for the Secretary to write to those two parties telling them that they pay $1.00 and get membership in the State and National both, but can- not by present arrangements have the American Bee Journal. Mr. Primm — Does 50 cents admit the member into this association, or $1.00? Mr. Smith — A dollar. They pay their $1.00 and we credit them for membership in the State Association and send 50 cents to the General Manager of the National, which gives them also membership one year in National. Mr. Stone — The membership is $1.00, and if this Asso- ciation votes to join the National in a body they give us 54 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT membership for 50 cents each per member. They can't object to accepting that. Mr. Primm — We can take their $1.00 and send 50 cents of it on to the other body. Dr. Miller — I move that this society as a body go into the National Association, and accept their offer to pay into its treasury 50 cents per member. Mr. Smith — You have heard the motion. All in favor say, "Aye;" contrary, "No." Motion prevailed. Dr. Miller — I don't know. Mr. Smith — I have found it successful by queen-exclud- ers; they won't carry pollen where the queen can't go. Mr. Poindexter — There is one case in which pollen is not carried into the sections — where they have drone-comb mixed with it. Mr. President — My experience is that they have both brood and pollen in the sections. Mr. Smith — Mr. Poindexter is right; it is a rare thing to see pollen in drone-cells if you have drone-comb. Dr. Miller — The queen will get into the sections unless the excluder keeps her out. If you have drone comb in your sections and the queen goes up here, the queen will lay in the dro ne-comb and the bees will store pollen in the comb close by. If you allow me to say so, it is a rare thing to have pollen in section. I don't have an excluder, but I have the sections filled entirely with foundation, and that is the important part, because if the sections are only partly filled it will be drone-comb in the part left, and that encourages the queen coming up. Fill your sections with foundation and you will have no more pollen. Mr. Poindexter — My experience is that the foundation which I am using will certainly keep the brood out, but it doesn't keep the pollen out, not by any means; it is still there. Dr. Miller — May I ask what is the depth of your brood- frames ? Mr. Poindexter — I have had shallow brood-frames but I have pollen carried up. I don't know any especial reason for it. It may be there is a surplus of pollen in my neighbor- hood. What troubles me is the getting of pollen in section honey. Mr. Smith — ^Do you use queen-excluders? Mr. Poindexter — No, sir. Mr. Smith — You try that and you will have no trouble. A Member — I use queen-excluders in two colonies at present and it is just the same. Dr. Miller — The point is this, he says they store honey over the excluder. I think the reason the excluder keeps it out is because the queen doesn't go up there, and there is no laying in the surplus. Mr. Smith — Is it not a fact that the workers will build drone-comb in the surplus where the queen can't get? siATiv i!i;i>Ki:i;i'i:i^s AssotiAirox. i).> Dr. Millc-r — 1 (Ion"!, kimw llirit it i-- ims^ihlr. Mr. Sniitli — I lia\c- liad tlial cxi)ci"ieiioc. llK.i'.S DKXWINC DIT CO.MI!. '"Is il a fact that I)crs draw nut ciunl)?"' Dr. Miller — I sliiuild '-a.y yes as far as i know. I think (he hecs do. .Mr. Stone — f a^kt'd that (pu'^iiun. I )(> they draw it d?5?i'rJf=^^^,73i'^^ -- ■:. . - - ■ ; '^."- -:-.;?-^^ -'•■ ^-./'■^ STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 109 books and journals; you shouldn't have done anything of the kind. The way to introduce a queen is not to kill the old queen to start with. The way to do is to leave the old queen in the hive; don't interfere with her at all. When you get your cage with the new queen, uncover the wire so that the bees in the cage can get at the bees inside of it, and get at the queen if tiiey want to. Leave it there at least 48 hours, then catch the old queen and kill it, and uncover the candy and cover up your hive as quick as you can. Just as soon as you find the queen and kill it don't spend another moment's time but get the frames back in as quickly as pos- sible; uncover the candy, cover up the hive and go about your business, and pay no attention to them for two or three days; and when you go back you will find the queen laying every time, and never have one balled. If you kill the old queen according to the instructions in all the books, in nine cases out of ten you will have trouble and have them balled. Dr. Miller — I have had queens balled a good many times when there was but one queen in the hive and none other had ever been in; they balled their own queen. Mr. Dadant — There are many cases in which we have balled queens. I have seen hundreds of instances. I have had two swarms come out and each of the two queens balled because some of the bees of the other swarm were with that queen. I have had queens that I was about to introduce, balled before I had any time to do anything with them. I have seen young queens balled in the hive. Those things are accidents that happen in the bee-business, and the best of us cannot avoid them. Mr. Root — -I would like to agree with both gentlemen, but I think Mr. Dadant is exactly right. I also agree with Mr. Abbott on his method of introducing queens. We have been trying that all the past summer and the plan is all right. Leave the old queen in the hive until you are ready to release the new queen. We have been doing it with our virgin and laying queens and it works better than it worked the other way. But the "A B C of Bee Culture" has been changed, Mr. Abbott, and our directions are changed to cover that. We introduce our virgins; we have three or four in a hive at a time, and we also have a laying queen. As those virgin queens begin to lay we take out the laying queen and leave the other in the hive, and when the other begins to lay we take her out. I think there is one point that has been dropped, and that is this question of scent of the bees. At the University of Pennsylvania I spent some three months a year ago last summer, and after working a long time at this problem the intention was to consider some problem of introducing. I remember Mr. Abbott had been trying to pound that thing into us, and we didn't believe it — Mr. Abbott — For twenty years. [Laughter.] Mr. Root — And Dr. Phillips takes the ground — and he has been studying this question very carefully — ^that this question of introduction depends almost entirely on the scent of the bees. If the bees are balled, and you handle that ball 110 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT in your hand and get that queen in your fingers, the chances are that they will ball up again because that scent has been changed. The bee's sense of smell is very acute. If the scent is changed a little bit the conditions are different. They rec- ognize her somewhat as a stranger. I have had queens balled in our yard. By picking up the queen and showing her to visitors and dropping her back, they will ball her. Sometimes a disturbance in the hive will cause them to ball her. But this question of scent plays a more important part in it than we bee-keepers have been in the habit of thinking. If she has the same scent as the rest of the bees she will be accepted. A little while ago Mr. Stanley spoke about putting virgin queens in a hive where there is a laying queen. If they have the scent of the rest of the bees the bees won't tackle them, but if the laying mother can get at those then there will be war. Mr. Smith — Why do bees ball their queens? In my ex- perience I find that there are two motives, one is to protect them and another is to kill them. I will illustrate : I had an Italian second swarm and a black swarm go together, and both queens were balled. The yellow queen was balled with her own bees ; the blacks also balled their own queen. I liberated them and neither one was hurt. I introduced the black queen and she flew away. I introduced the yellow queen and shook the bees all out on the ground, and dropped her in among the bees as they went to the hive. She was introduced that way perfectly safe. The black queen came back and lit on the outside, and the yellow bees killed her. In the first place they had balled their own queen, which I think was for protection. Mr. Abbott — I want to say I didn't mean my remarks to apply to these abnormal conditions of two swarms going together or anything of that kind. I want to be rightly understood. I just let them go together and let them fight it out. I don't fool with them. Mr. Smith — If you alarm a colony they will sometimes ball their queen. That is to protect the queen. Mr. Root — Shut the hive up and they will be all right. DISPENSING WITH THE BEE-VEIL. "Generally speaking, can the bee-veil be dispensed with? How many think it can?" Mr. Smith I would like -to see a man go through 40 or 50 colonies in the honey season without a bee-veil. Mr. Dadant — There are a few gentlemen here that get along without bee-veils but if they wanted to follow some of us all day among the bees and not flinch, stay right with it, they will wish they had a bee-veil, unless they are absolutely proof against the sting, and there are very few that are. When you have a bee-veil you don't have to wear it all the time, but you have it at hand so that you can wear it if you have to. Mr. Miller — I may say in regard to that, that there are d' ■■ STATE BEE-KEEPERS ASSOCIATION. Ill men who do not use a bee-veil at all. There was one of them went in one of my apiaries; he went around with me with a smoker and he said, "They will never sting me; there is no need for me to wear a veil." And he kept that smoke going all the while, so I couldn't have any use of the smoker, I won't give you the man's name because I am afraid it might hurt the feelings of his son Ernest. [Laughter.] Mr. Whitney — There was a friend of mine who said he didn't need a veil. He was extracting a great deal of honey. He sold the honey around through the community. I didn't know anything about bees then, and he invited me into the yard where he was taking off some frames; and he said, "They never sting an honest man." I went in and stood around the hive and pretty soon a bee struck him right over the mouth. I said, "I guess you're right." [Laughter.] Mr. Moore — If any one really wants to handle bees with- out a veil he can do it. I have been engaged in marketing honey in Chicago, and for the sake of advertising I have done a great many outlandish things. I have attempted to go into my own hives and other peoples' without the bee-veil. The past summer I didn't carry a veil with me except on one or two days. I opened the hive without smoke. But I want to tell you right now, I got stung on one occasion twelve or fifteen times because not wearing a veil. If you are so patriotic, all right; but as a rule it pays to have a veil. Mr. Whitney — A friend of mine in Ohio has been able to handle his bees without a veil for years. At one time he thought he would look into one hive and he took off the cover, and they came out. He backed up and held uo his hands and they still came. He turned around and ran down the outside cellar-way and shut the trap-door, and he was stung so badly he fainted away and was sick for three weeks. Since then he hasn't been able to handle bees at all. A lady friend said, "I always use a veil; never go into the yard without one." 'shook'' or "shaken" swarm. "Is it better to say. "shook swarm" or "shaken swarm?" Mr. Root — If Dr. Miller wasn't here I would say "shaken swarms," but in his presence I always say, "shook swarms." Pres. York — I think we would better refer that to Mr. Hutchinson. Mr. Hutchinson — I agree with Mr. Root on that ques- tion. Dr. Miller — If that thing is entirely to spite me, I am going to say a word about it. I am very glad of an oppor- tunity to say a word in favor of having people at large under- stand that bee-keepers are not a lot of ignoramuses. I have felt mortified at the use of that word as a violation of com- mon English, that a teacher in any one of our public schools would know better than to countenance. If either of these good brethren who have such a vicious feeling towards me can give me any possible reason why the word "shook" is any better than the word "shaken," they can give me some- 112 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT thing I have never had yet. The word "shook" expresses something to me a little stronger than the word "shaken." When Mr. Root told me that, I knew that there was some- think that had shaken loose in his brain. If they have a seat reserved in one of these places, say in a concert, there will be laid down a little slip and on it marked, "Taken." Do you think I would feel any more secure of that seat if it was marked, "Took." [Laughter]. Now, I consider this, without any joking, of enough consequence that we should spend a little time upon it. If there is any reason why "shook" is better than "shaken" I would like to hear it. One is good English, the other is bad, and it seems to me that is enough to settle the question, unless you can give some other very strong reason. Mr. Dadant — In regard to this matter I think there is a great deal in locality! [Laughter.] I am foreign born, but when some of our Western Americans took a trip to Europe I was with them, and I had occasion to say to an Englishman, "Hurry up," and he said, "I suppose you mean "make haste." Mr. Whitney — When I saw the words "shook swarm" I thought the whole thing was wrong. What is a swarm? It is bees in the air or in cluster. Then you can't make a shook swarm or a shaken swarm. It is simply a colony of bees. You can't shake them or have them swarm in the air or clus- ter, so that it is not a swarm at all. Mr. Wheeler — I would like to know of how much money value this is to us. We are here to learn something. I didn't leave my work to come here to listen to sport. I came here to learn something about bee-keeping. Now what does this have to do with bee-keeping? Mr. Abbott — I used to teach school and they paid me $50 a month for teaching their children the correct use of the English language. It must have had some value to me. But I disagree with Dr. Miller that the use of the word "shook" is not as correct as shaken." This is simply the invention of a new condition of things, and new conditions of things are creating words and phrases every day in America. I suppose I could mention 50 that have been created within the last few years. It is just as proper to apply "shook" to a new condi- tion of things as "shaken;" and the words got into Dr. Mil- ler's dictionary that way. Pres. York — This is one of the questions for diversion. Now we will go on to something more solid. Mr. Wheeler — We have editors, such as Mr. Hutchinson ; leave such things to him. We don't want to spend our time here to-day on that. He will put that word in just as he pleases when he gets home, anyway. ADVANTAGE OF SHOOK SWARMING. "What is the advantage of shook swarming?" Mr. Hutchinson — I suppose primarily that the principle advantage of this shook swarming is that we are able to have the work gone on with without being there to see to it. We y-¥~f TT'*''**' I** ^ > ' /^ -^w>*' -^ :^,*'0'^!*'^^'"''«'^ ''*'-*'"'*^^g*?»''i5;^^ " s.v^_ •' *flf 1)^,; ti STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 113 forestall swarming. We make preparations for the bees to swarm and we are not there to take care of them, so instead of that we go at it and shake them off and make the swarms while we are there to see to it. Pres. York — What about joining the National in a body this year? Dr. Miller — Moved, duly seconded, that this Association join the National in a body, at the rate of 50 cents a member. Pres. York put the motion which, on a vote having been taken, was declared carried. Dr. Miller — Right in connection with the point which is before us is the question of uniting with the State. If it is a proper thing to bring that up now I move that this Associa- tion, as a body, unite with the Illinois State Association, pay- ing into its treasury 25 cents per member. The motion was seconded. Mr. Colburn — ^What is the present membership of the Illinois Society? Mr. Smith — The present membership of the Illinois State Association is over 150. Mr. Wilcox — How many bee-keepers' societies are there in the State of Illinois ? Mr. York — I think there are two besides this, outside of the State organization, that is, the Northern Illinois and the Western Illinois. Mr. Whitney — I want to ask the Treasurer as to what effect taking 25 cents for each member joining the State would have upon our balance in the Treasury? Mr. Moore — There would not be enough money left in the Treasury to support our Association if we paid out 75 cents on each dollar, that is, 50 cents to the National and 25 cents to the Illinois State. The actual expenditure for mem- bership if this motion is passed, under our Constitution, will be about $20 out of our treasury. After a long discussion Pres. York put the motion that this Association join the Illinois State Association in a body by paying 25 cents a member, which, on a vote having been taken, was declared carried. The necessary amount to pay same was secured by passing the hat. ELECTION OF OFFICERS. The President appointed as tellers Messrs. Fluegge, Jacob and Dadant. Ballots were taken and the officers were all re-elected as follows: President, George W. York; Vice- President, Mrs. N. L. Stow; and Secretary-Treasurer, Her- man F. Moore. queen's wing and leg growing. "Does a queen's wing ever grow again after being clipped?" Dr. Miller— No. Mr. Criggs — Does a queen's leg ever grow where a leg has been pulled out? 114 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Dr. Miller— No. Mr. Criggs — I was clipping a queen's wing one time with gloves on, and I didn't have a very steady hand, and in some way pulled off one of the large legs right to the bottom. I was sorry at the time, but I thought they had so much brood and eggs they could rear another queen. However, I kept close watch and they didn't rear another queen to take her place, but this queen in the course of another two weeks had another leg. Mr. Wilcox — Did her progeny have a missing leg, too? [Laughter.] Mr. Criggs — I didn't find any that did. Dr. Miller — I would rather believe a clipped queen got into that hive from another hive than to believe the wings or leg would grow on again. That has sometimes happened. ' A clipped queen has gone from one hive into another. Mr. Criggs — I should say not. This was a pure Italian queen and all the other queens within two rods were dark. I had only half a dozen Italian queens in the whole apiary of about 60 or 80 colonies; the rest were all dark bees. Mr. Whitney — Was that a queen of your own rearing? Mr, CriggS;— No. OUTDOOR WINTERING OF BEES. "In outdoor wintering is water running out of the en- tranqe of the hive an indication of poor wintering." Mr. Wilcox — I should say not, but it indicates poor prep- aration for wintering. There ought to be absorption enough so that it wouldn't condense and accumulate. Mr. Snell — That has been my experience. If the ventila- tion is proper, and the preparation is proper for wintering, there will be no water running out from the entrance. STARTING WITH BEES. "Tell a few good ways for beginners to get a start in bees and a first-class ex5)erience at one and the same time." Dr. Miller — Buy a colony of bees, buy a bee-book, or several of them, and subscribe for a bee-paper, or several of them, and then go on and get your experience. Pres. York — I noticed that the Doctor didn't say he could buy his experience, too. Dr. Miller — ^He will buy it and pay for it. EFFECT OF MARKET REPORTS ON HONEY PRICES. "What effect has market reports on the price of honey?" Mr. Burnett — I don't know that I ought to answer or en- deavor to answer that question. I make some market reports. What effect it has, has to be problematic. I think, however, it is in general alignment with all other reports on prices. Peo- ple are guided by what they find to be a price in a certain market. It gives you an idea of what goods can be obtained STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 115 for there. It is also a guide for those seeking a market. I should think it had a good deal to do as a matter of fact with the general business of the country. Mr. Colburn — I am a resident of Chicago and I asked that question because I wanted to find out if there is any dif- ference, or if it had any appreciable effect; and the reason I asked it is, I have been on South Water Street a good many times and I always found on enquiring there that the. prices of honey were invariably greater than these market reports give us to understand. Why that is so I don't just know. I think I know the South Water Street houses pretty well. I was a grocer here in Chicago for a number of years and went all around the streets with my market wagon on every day in the summer, and every other day in the winter, and I found things down there were quite peculiar. This fall I examined up and down the street on one or two days and I found at that time five different firms reported honey as selling at 15 cents a pound in one-pound sections. At that time our market quotations — the nearest was within seven days — gave us prices at 12 to 14 cents. This is what I don't understand, and I want to understand it. Every bee-keeper within 300 miles of Chicago who sends his honey here, if he takes these papers, naturally is enquiring and looking at these reports, and these reports ought to be reasonably accurate. At the stock yards, with which I was familiar for a number of years, the market reports give the actual sales as they are. They don't say, "We quote so and so." They say, "Armour bought so and so, such and such a kind of stock, and it sold for so much." I think our market reports ought to be under the control of this Association, on account of the fact that there is such an apparent discrepancy between the reports in the papers and the actual condition on the street. We as individuals who are bee-keepers are interested in having prices at a reasonable figure, and we don't want any market reports which show the prices of honey to be less than it is generally sold at. Whether they are, or not, I can't say, but I think they are. In every investigation I have made I have in- variably found a difference of one or two cents in the reported price of the honey from the price on the street. In the quo- tation from Milwaukee it is from one to two cents higher than the Chicago market, and yet Milwaukee is 200 miles nearer the great center of honey-production than we are. I brought this up because I think the bee-keepers will lose two cents a pound on every pound they send to Chicago unless they get straight market reports. Mr. Wilcox — The question is, What effect do market re- ports have on the honey market? If they be timely and truth- ful they tend to steady the market, to prevent fluctuations, and are highly profitable to all. Mr. Moore — There isn't any use in allowing any preju- dice to enter into the discussion of these questions. I know a good many people think that all lawyers are thieves, and all commission men in the same class. They are very much like the rest of us; they are all honest and all dishonest. But 116 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT according to Mr. Colburn's own statement there is no dis- crepancy. He said the market report gave 12 to 14 cents. Twelve meant the lower grade, 14 meant the highest grade. Understand that those quotations mean some considerable sale. You go along and ask a man what is the price and he says 15 cents. He thinks, to look at you at first, you are a suburbanite, come to carry honey home under your arm. If you say, "Here, I want five or ten cases," he gives it at 14 cents, according to the quotation that you say was quoted. There are dififerent circumstances. Quantity and quality of purchase make a difference as to quotations, as you state it, and are fair. Mr. Burnett — As to difference, I would like to have him change the word invariable to variable. It seems to me it is hardly fair that it should be invariably higher than the quota- tions. As a matter of fact we all know that is not the fact. That buying honey, as he buys it — perhaps he met a man who buys from the receivers. The majority of the houses on South Water Street that sell honey in a small way or keep a few cases, buy it from some of the receivers, and they need to get a cent a pound as a margin over and above what they pay. The purpose, as I have understood for many years, of market reports, is to give as nearly as may be the actual value of honey sold as received. A lot of honey sold consisting of 25 or 100 or 1,000 cases is the price that the purchaser must be guided by. Allow him to send the honey here and get a cent a pound less than the quotations are for that grade of honey, he feels that he has not had the market value for it. So that it is not fair to any one to say that it is invariably so, but that it does vary is a fact. Mr. Fluegge — I find the market quotations in Chicago given out as nearly correct as they possibly can be. I visited a number of grocersTnen and they informed me that the prices they paid for first-class honey were 14 cents a pound, and that is comb honey. That is what the quotations are now. I have been watching it for several years and there is very little difference between what the grocerymen say and what the quotations are, so I think they are as nearly correct as we can get tiiem from that standpoint. HORIZONTAL WIRING OF COMB-FOUNDATION. "Can brood-frames filled with full sheets of foundation be wired horizontally in a manner that will prevent buckling?" Mr. Dadant — If we wire foundation at all, I believe as a general thing those who do wire put their first wire too low. The weight is at the top — ^the pull is on the top story; the cells are nearest to the top of the frame and the first wire should be put very close to the top, within an inch. When you come to the bottom of the frame, those who have handled fotmdation for years, know that those cells are hardly ever stretched, and there is no need of wiring below the middle of the frame. If you put one wire at the middle and the other STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 117 two above, you will have better success than if you put the wires within your space in the frame. Dr. Miller — I would like to ask Mr. Dadant a question I think germane to the subject. In those, do you suppose that the wires are taut or slack? Mr. Dadant — It would be better for the wires to be taut if they are pressed into the foundation. A slack wire is only supposed to follow the wax if it settles. The great trouble is giving it to swarms. When full sheets of foundation are given they sag at once before it is finished; that is the time when it is really more of a strain upon it than is natural with the comb, because bees build their combs entirely at the top before they lengthen them, but when you give them a full sheet they will load it from the bottom, and the top has a greater strain upon it, and I think nearly all the strain takes place from that. I think the wire ought to be taut, but in a great many cases it is not necessary at all if it is carefully done to wire. SIZE OF COLONIES OF BEES IN SPRING. "How much brood, honey and bees should there be in a hive in the time of fruit-bloom before putting on supers?" Mr. Wilcox — I am confident that the answer to that will vary according to the locality somewhat. For my part I never put supers on during fruit-bloom. Then, the quantity of bees cuts no figure. If there is not surplus enough coming in our locality at that time to make a decent start, I always divide them, if they are strong enough to bear dividing without be- ing weak colonies, when clover opens in the middle of June. Fruit-bloom is in the middle of May, and if there are two bushels of bees I would divide them ; if there was one bushel I would divide them; if there were 10 pounds of live bees I would divide them and give the other half a young queen, but I would build them both up for the ho^iey harvest the first of July or the latter part of June. Our best honey-yield comes in August, fronj wild flowers. Consequently I would be sure, ansrway, to have more bees to gather more honey later in the season. PREVENTION OF ROBBING DURING A HONEY-FLOW. "What can be done to prevent bees from robbing in the honey-flow season?" Mr. Hutchinson — You couldn't make them rob them. Dr. Miller — ^They can rob. The way to stop them is to take away the fool bee-keeper that gets them to rob. Pres. York — He ought to be clipped! EXTRACTING FROM COMBS HAVING BROOD. "Will extracting from combs containing unsealed brood injure the quality of the honey provided no brood is thrown out?" 118 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Mr. Wilcox — No. Mr. Burnett — A gentleman here has the idea with regard to that brood, that it has a tendency to sour the honey. If there is any such thing it is important. It may be one of those things that is an unknown quantity to us. We often find in a consignment of honey, there are one or two packages that will ferment, and the rest show no tendency to do so. As dealers, and finding so many instances of that kind, we are quite at a loss to know what is the cause of it. Dr. Miller — I should say yes to that question ; if you had obliged me to say yes or no just at first blush I should have said no, but thinking more carefully over it I should say yes, because if you put brood-frames — and by that we generally understand combs containing brood — into an extractor you most surely will have unripe honey in that, and when you throw unripe honey out you are likely to injure the quality of your honey, and that may account for the kind of honey that Mr. Burnett is talking about. Mr. Wilcox — I think it is terrible to throw out unripe honey, but it does not follow just as he expressed it, surely. Dr. Miller — Almost surely. Mr. Dadant — I have had considerable experience in the matter of extracting honey. I must say, in the first place, it is not advisable to extract honey from combs containing young brood; and in the second place I believe Dr. Miller is right; if you do that you are extracting in the beginning of the season and you will have thin honey. If you extract at the end of the season from brood-combs that contain brood and sealed honey the brood will likely be sealed also. There- fore it is unlikely that the bee-keeper who wants good honey will extract from brood-combs containing unsealed honey. If it contains any he can throw it out without throwing any brood out. Those who are expert enough can make it in such a manner that it moved the larvae a little forv/ard when it was extracted and this larvae could work back after the comb was taken back to the hive, or the bees would take them back, and yet none of them were thrown out. But you don't want a careless boy to turn the ex- tractor, because a little too fast whirling will throw the brood out, and then you have a chance for fermentation. Although, I believe very ripe honey will not ferment even if it has brood in it. The ancients tell us they used to preserve bodies in honey, showing that honey will keep things from rotting. I believe that bees and larvae will be preserved in the honey if th^ honey is ripe, but if the honey is unripe it will be sure to ferment, whether you have dead larvae in it or not. Mr. Wheeler — I have had a suspicion of that thing for quite a number of years, and the more I have watched it and studied it, the more I have made up my mind there is a great deal in it. You not only throw out the honey, but the food that is given to the bees, that sours the larvae. One has to be very careful in extracting. Another point Mr. Dadant makes about the honey season bemg STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 119 at a close; we don't have such a thing around Chicago where there is sweet clover; honey is gathered so that they can continue to breed and have young bees at all times. If you extract from those combs that have brood in you must have young larvae. And then those young bees have a liquid: they are floating in a liquid. If that liquid is thrown out it is my impression it floats on top of the honey and it sours and gives the smell of sourness to the whole dish of honey. Yet I believe the honey down underneath is just as sweet as it ever was. Mr. Wilcox — You don't believe that is thrown out without throwing out some brood? Mr. Wheeler — That is immaterial. We do throw out the brood. I think you throw out some of that liquid when you don't throw out the brood. QUEENS KILLED WHEN INTRODUCING. "I introduced a queen into a queenless colony and they killed her; four days afterwards I introduced another qyeen and they killed her. What should I have done?" Mr. Wheeler — I would say, put healthy young bees into the hive to kill any drone-layers. They would pre- pare the way for the queen every time. Mr. Swift — I had the crossest lot of bees I ever ran across in my life; I couldn't get the queen into that hive; I tried three different queens. I gave it up. I kept them supplied with young bees all the time. Mr. Snell — ^The best way is to introduce two frames of young bees into the parent colony, and at the same time put their queen in with them, or introduce a queen at that time. Those bees seem to destroy the laying worker so that the queen is never molested. I have never yet had a failure in that way. DETECTING ADULTERATION IN BEESWAX. "How can we detect foreign substance in beeswax?" Mr. Dittmer — I don't know that I can give any rule. It is force of habit with me. I get wax sometimes, and it looks suspicious, and there is generally something the matter with it. The most common thing that occurs with me is receiving wax that contains tallow. In fact, some people have shipped wax to me and were rather rash about it, so that I think almost anybody could have de- tected it; but as to giving any chemical process, I can't say anything about it. Mr. Abbott — I see Dr. Wiley has written another let- ter to explain the matter with regard to what is called the "Wiley lie," published in the Rural New Yorker. I was writing an editorial note on it before I left, for the Modern Farmer, and I used a sentence at the last of it that these comb-foundation people will be interested in, and these bee-keepers. Dr. Wiley says that paraffin is 120 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT used wholly or in part in comb-foundation in the United States. This statement came from Canada a short time ago, and now it is repeated by the chief chemist of the United States, and I say in my editorial there are only a few manufacturers of comb foundation in the United States. If they put paraffin in wax they know it, and we want to know it. If they don't do it, it will not be a very hard thing for them to prove it. If they do do it, it will be a very easy thing for the United States' chemists to prove. Now this subject of foundation is up, I think it would be a good time to hear from the comb-foundation makers right now as to what they have to say in answer to Dr. Wiley. I have had my say in the paper, and it will appear in the next issue, and I want to know if they put paraffin in foundation. Mr. Dadant — I will give you three methods by which you can all detect, without chemical analysis, whether comb foundation is pure or not, and you can test it with your own beeswax, comparatively. The first test we have is the HEAT TEST. It is the most delicate because you have to get the exact heat at the exact spot. Foundation is a little more brittle, a little more in pieces than solid bees- wax. Therefore you will heat the foundation more readily than beeswax. A lump of beeswax that is round or large will not heat so readily through as sheet foundation full of holes. Therefore you must expect your foundation to melt a little more readily. Between 135 and 150 is the temperature, but your thermometers may vary a little. You take a piece of beeswax, tie it to the thermometer, take it to the right spot, put it in a pint bottle, put the stopper in it, put it on the stove, and see at what degree that thin beeswax melts. Do the same with the sheet foundation, and see whether it melts at the same or about the same temperature. Another test is the saponification TEST. That is the changing of beeswax into soap; it will change to soap as grease will. It is no longer beeswax. Take lye and heat it, and take beeswax and melt it, and pour the two together and it will no longer be beesv/ax; if it is paraffin it will be paraffin. The paraffin will pour out just the same as before. The paraffin is a min- eral substance which is not at all touched by lye, while beeswax is absolutely dissolved by lye. The third test is specific gravity. Beeswax is heavier or lighter than other substances of the same kind. That is another very fine test, because if there is a little bulb of air in your specimen, whether beeswax or foundation, you will change the specific gravity. It is very difficult to make that test, but you can. A specimen that has a great deal of paraffin of one kind will flow where beeswax would go with the foundation. The way to do is this: Take water and put pure beeswax into it. Pour in alcohol until the beeswax goes to the bottom. The beeswax is then heavier than the solution which you have of water and alcohol. Then you are ready to test any samples -^-■■'".■.■fer*.- STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 121 that may come to you. In this particular it is the same thing as before. If your foundation is full of holes, when you put it under, the air will be in those and hold it up. You have to be very particular to have the wax from your foundation the same as your beeswax, if you want to make a proper test. If you have a sample of paraffin it will float, while the beeswax will go to the bottom. Mr. Dittmer — It seems to me that the statement that Mr. Abbott has made, as to what Prof. Wiley said, puts the comb-foundation manufacturers in the position of be- ing guilty unless they are proved innocent. It seems to me that is rather a poor predicament to find one's self in. Personally, I am perfectly satisfied that neither the Da- daiits nor the Roots use anything but what they know to be pure beeswax. So far as I am concerned, I think that my reputation with those who have used my founda- tion will carry me through. I think that the foundation manufacturers of this country have always had the repu- tation of using nothing but what they honestly knew to be pure beeswax; and as to taking the position of proving otSrselves innocent, it seems to me that is the wrong posi- tion. We should be first proved guilty, and then give us a chance of saying something. But this idea of considering a man guilty until he proves himself innocent is wrong. Dr. Miller — In Europe there are perhaps some 17,000 or more of the Rietsche presses in use; a large number of the bee-keepers making their own foundation. In this country I think there are not nearly so many bee-keepers making their own foundation as there were 25 years ago. I think the reason that so many of those Rietsche presses are used in Europe, and that the making of foundation has been simmered down to a small number of manufac- turers, is that in Europe, they cannot buy pure founda- tion as we can here. I don't have any thought at all about the quality of foundation when I buy it; I know it is pure almost as absolutely as if I had given it all three of the tests mentioned by Mr. Dadant. I think Mr. Dittmer is entirely right in saying every man should be supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, and the burden of proof should not lie upon the manufacturer to prove that he is innocent. I think in the same way Wiley, if he has made that mistake again, should be taught to believe that he should not, after having made such a sad mistake before — that he should certainly not make the third mistake, or the bee-keepers of the country will resent it. Mr. Abbott — Of course, you are just taking this on my say so, but I have the article and I suppose it is set up in type now and will be in the Modern Farmer in the next issue, and I cut it from the Rural New Yorker. This let- ter is addressed to the editor of that paper, and signed by Dr. Wiley. It seems the editor of the Rural New Yorker asked for an article with regard to the matter of adul- terated honey, and Dr. Wiley is endeavoring to set himself right. It is in connection with the Ladies' Home Journal 122 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT statement, and there is a whole column in it and the arti- cle closes up with the statement I refer to. Of course it was news to me. I thought I had been handling tons and tons of foundation that was pure, or, at least, I had been telling my customers it was pure, and I was standing behind it myself, and I had my reputation at stake and I wanted you people to know it as soon as possible. I thought I would send it to the American Bee Journal, but we like to get "a scoop," and I thought I would copy it first. Pres. York — Have you the entire letter? Mr. Abbott — I have the entire copy, my comment and the editor's upon it. Dr. Miller — Just what is the statment he did make? Mr. Abbott — The sentence states that honey is not adulterated, but that paraffin is used wholly or in part in the manufacture of foundation. Those are not exactly the words but that is the substance of it. Dr. Miller — That leaves it, he might say if he knew of a single case in which some fool who was making ex- periments might have used only half a pound of it. Per- haps it will be wise for us to be careful in what we say, and rather ask the question whether Prof. Wiley has any proof; and perhaps it would be wise to let the journals ask him. I think that would be better. Mr. Dadant — I think you are doing Mr. Wiley a great deal too much honor by paying so much attention to what he says. In regard to this accusation, it only strikes one or two firms. I am perfectly willing to stand on my own responsibility, and my respectability, without any atten- tion being paid to it. Mr. Dittmer — Mr. Dadant is wholly right. Prof. Wiley's reputation in the past has been such that he de- serves no attention on our part, and the best way to get rid of an obnoxious person is to ignore him. Mr. Abbott — Mr. Wiley is chief chemist of the United States; his word is authority not only in the United States but all over the world. He is quoted as the repre^ sentative of the United States by the chemical men of the world and we cannot ignore Mr. Wiley. We have to face the fact that he represents the United States among the scholars of the world so far as chemistry is concerned, and he represents the United States so far as the people in command are concerned. We cannot ignore those things. It is all right enough to say we are giving him too much advertising. We are not giving him too much. The chief chemist of the United States, who speaks by authority of the United States, ought to tell the truth. Mr. Dadant — But he doesn't. It will serve no purpose whatever to demand anything. A man who will state a thing which he knows to be false will stick to the false- hood. He will make an untruthful statement again, and it will simply make matters worse by having anything to do with him. STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 133 Mr. Hutchinson — Not only Mr. Dadant but all other comb-foundation manufacturers are affected if these state- ments go out in the Rural New Yorker all over to the reading community that buy honey; it prejudices them against our product. Mr. Dadant — In that case, don't ask him to prove it but simply state that it is not so. If you ask him to prove it when he has made the statement he will prove it in some way if he has to manufacture something in order to prove it in one single instance. That will be sufficient for him, and sufficient to hurt your business that much more. Mr. Colburn — I wanted to ask if anybody here knows whether bees will work on foundation that is made partially of paraffin? Dr. Miller — Yes, they will. Mr. Colburn — What proportion ? Dr. Miller — I don't know. Mr. Wilcox — ^What causes the difference in foundation with regard to some being very hard and others very soft at the same temperature? ' Mr. Dadant — Beeswax is a little like iron; you can cast iron and make it malleable, and it is the same way with bees- wax. Pour beeswax into a mould and the cake will be brit- tle. It will break readily and you can't stretch it. But put that cake of beeswax under the roller and it will become mal- leable; that is, warm it to a certain temperature. There are a good many points concerning beeswax that it is impossible for the general public to know. In regard to the adultera- tion of beeswax with tallow, it may be well to inform you as to the way of detecting tallow. It is very easily detected; it makes the beeswax softer, and when you have a cake which you suspect of having tallow at the ordinary temperature, run your fingernail over the cake. If it is pure beeswax it will make ripples in the cake; if it is tallow it will make a dull-looking streak in the cake. INCREASING THE CIRCULATION OF BEE-PAPERS. Pres. York — Here is a question that I didn't ask myself, but I would like to know the answer. "What can be done to increase the circulation of bee-papers?" Mr. Moore — Advertise. Mr. Abbott — I do not think that that ought to be passed by. I am not saying that because I am interested in papers ; I don't publish a bee-paper; I publish a farm paper. But it does seem to me that there is not enough pride among bee- keepers in our industry. I asked that question and I asked it because I wanted to say something. You take the poultry people, and there are in the United States something like 15 or 20 poultry papers that have a circulation ranging from 25,000 to 75,000. They all have good circulation, and every poultry keeper swears by his poultry paper. Every poultry keeper has a pride in his industry and therefore he reads carefully his poultry paper. They do not all take the same 124 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT paper, of course, but they swear by some poultry paper, and they go out and talk it up amongst their friends, and they get subscribers for the different papers; they are talking it up at institutes and poultry meetings, and all the time interested in pushing the circulation of their papers. But it seems to» be a crime to mention a bee-paper at any bee-convention. The editors are so modest they will hardly distribute sample copies for fear some one will say they are trying to drum up trade. If they are, they are drumming up trade that helps us. Take the American Bee Journal, the only weekly bee-paper that is published on this continent and it has a paltry circula- tion say of less than 10,000 copies, and perhaps there are less than 30,000, all told, that read bee-papers, and we are told.. and we tell the world, that there are over 300,000 bee-keepers in the United States. Are there less than 30,000 out of 300,- 000 who have enough pride in the industry to spend one dollar a year to learn what is going on in the industry? It seems they must think it a very small business if it is not worth investing a dollar in. There is no other kind of an industry but what the people who belong to it are willing to take three or four different papers. The hog people, the sheep people, and the poultry people, take three or four papers. A man came into my place the other day who is just an ordi- nary poultry fancier in the city, and before he went out he had subscribed for four poultry papers in addition to mine. 1 said to my wife, "That fellow has some pride in his indus- try." If a man happens to take two or three bee-papers, and spends two or three dollars a year for bee-literature, he seems to think he is making a bank account for some fellow, that lives in the city. I can't understand how it is we have so little industrial pride in our papers. If the American Bee Journal, instead of having less than 10,000 had 100,000 sub- scribers, what a power it would be. Then when Mr. York opened his mouth in the American Bee Journal in regard to such a thing as we have just been discussing it would mean something, because he would have a constituency behind him, and he could make himself heard all over this land. I say, the way to do it is for the bee-keepers of the United States to take an interest in the circulation of our bee-papers. Mr. York, Mr. Root and Mr. Hutchinson will all be gone soon, their hair will soon be as grey as mine — mine is not very grey yet, but I am getting old, and I know it — and Dr. Miller there, and somebody rnust come into their places, and this industry is to be perpetuated and the bee-papers are what perpetuate it, and I say we ought to take more interest in it than we do, as individuals and bodies. Dr. Miller — I must say a word in defence after such a lambasting as that. I very much doubt whether there is a larger percentage of poultry men take the poultry papers than the percentage of bee-men that take bee-papers. Did you tell us how many poultry subscribers there are and how many poultry keepers? Please remember this, that there are more people that keep hens than keep bees, very many more; there are more than five times as many. STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 125 Mr. Abbott — I am talking of the poultry fancier. Dr. Miller — If you count the poultry fanciers and the bee-fanciers. I think they will rate very fairly. I think the bee- fanciers take just as many papers as the poultry fanciers take poultry papers. But you must remember that the sub- scription list of these papers is not made up of fanciers so much as of those who keep a few hens or a few bees. My wife keeps hens and several other wives keep hens, and they don't keep bees at all. When you take the number, I do believe Mr. Abbott will find out he is a little hard on us. We are keeping up to the mark just as well as the chicken people are. The thing in a nutshell is, there are not so many bee-keepers as there are of the others, and I don't believe we are as "worse" as we might be. Mr. Whitney — I agree somewhat with Mr. Abbott and with the Doctor. I think the Doctor's position is about cor- rect when he makes a comparison between the chicken men and bee-keepers. But the fact is, we don't take the bee- papers as we ought to. I don't care how many chicken men take chicken papers, every mother's son of us ought to take a bee-paper. There is not a farmer in the country but ought to take an agricultural paper and a bee-paper and a fruit journal. They all raise fruit, they all raise poultry, and nearly all of them ought to keep a few colonies of bees; that is, keep them right, keep them as they should be kept. I have tried my best in the last year to increase the sub- scription list of the different bee-papers ; I have succceeded in getting four or five individuals to subscribe, and they are delighted with what they get in the bee-papers. I think if we would all take that interest in it, that we go to somebody who is our neighbor — and some clever fellow would just as soon give a dollar for something he doesn't know anything about, may be he will learn something about it, and in that way we have increased the circulation of these different journals may be one hundred percent. I think we can do it next year, and if we do that, we will increase the member- ship of the National Association, too. Mr. Dadant — I wish to take issue with Mr. Abbott in the statement that there is a greater percentage of poultry raisers who take poultry papers than there are bee-keepers who take bee-papers. I believe it is the other way. I think you all know everybody keeps poultry, except a ■ few people in the big cities. Every farmer keeps chickens. We see the chickens when we pass by the farm-house; and lots of city people keep poultry. Now, wkat per cent are there of those people who keep bees? How many are there of the people who keep poultry who read a poultry paper? Only here and there. But of those who keep bees the great majority, who have an interest at all I believe, take a bee- paper. There are plenty who raise two hundred chickens a year and who make money out of them who do not take a poultry paper. But there are very few farmers that we find who make any money at all out of bees that do not take a bee-paper. Therefore, I believe, generally, the bee- 126 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT keepers take a journal where the poultry men do not take a poultry paper. Mr. Whitney — I know a bee-supply man who has a large sign out by the side of the railroad advertising bee-keeper's supplies and honey, and he doesn't take a journal, and I have talked to him more than a little to get him to subscribe for some of the journals. Dr. MilUer — I would like to ask those bee-keepers who take only one bee-paper to rise. (7 rose.) How many take only two? (2.) How many take only three? (16.) How man take only four? (5.) How many take more than four? (6.) I am very glad to have the opportunity of asking those questions. I want to follow the advice of Mr. Abbott, and urge that those who do not take a bee-paper, that did not rise, to take a bee-paper. lYou will like it; it will do you good. Pres. York — I would like to ask Mr. France to say what he found in Wisconsin, where he had made a pretty thorough canvass of bee-keepers, as to the proportion of them that take a bee-paper. Mr. France — A .few years ago, I don't remember the year, I was going to make a very thorough report while inspecting bees over the State. I beheve Wisconsin will average up to any other State as a honey-producing State; it will average as well in its proportion of those who are readers of bee-papers. When I had finished that season, I am sorry to say I found only one in twenty who was a reader of the bee-papers. That looks pretty tough for my own State, but I believe if you take the subscription lists you will find it will average up with the other States. It is just the same with the farmers' institute. Wherever the farmers' institutes were frequently held we found better farmers; and invariably wherever I find a home that takes a bee-paper I find a better bee-keeper. Mr. Abbott — I want to say further, I know scores of people who have from 10 to 15, 20 to 100 colonies, who do not take any bee-paper at all. I have a way of finding out because I am taking subscriptions on the basis of new sub- scribers only for the American Bee Journal, and you would be surprised to know the information that comes to me along that line. People come to me and say, "I want to take that club offer of yours;" and I say, "Why, you can't take that; you get the American Bee Journal right along; that is for new subscribers." They say, "No, I don't. I don't take it at all." Some of them say they never have taken it; and some of them say, "I never have heard of it; what kind of a paper is it?" And they don't all live in Missouri, either. [Laughter.] A NATIONAL HONEY EXCHANGE. "Is there any movement on foot regarding a honey ex- change or any method whereby the National Association can market its members' honey?" Pres. York — There was a movement started in St. Louis STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION, 127 to organize a National Honey Producers' Association, and there were some subscriptions of stock taken. Dr. Miller — But not for the National? The President — It was started in the National conven- tion. Dr. Miller — I think you are right that there was a move- ment started there to get up a honey exchange, but not that the National was to do anything about it. Mr. Whitney — From the report which was sent me I think the Doctor is right. There was an attempt to or- ganize something inside of the National, or by individuals who belonged to the National becoming stockholders of the new corporation if it was formed, for- that purpose. CASH FOR PROOF OF ADULTERATED COMB HONEY. "I suggest that this Association offer $500 for two pounds of comb honey that is proved to be adulterated." Prof. York — I don't know who suggested that, or where the $500 is to come from, but the intention no doubt is all ri^ht. It is proposed that this Association offer $500 for two pounds of comb honey. I suppose it is meant two pounds that the bees didn't make. What are you going to do with it? Mr. France — I think nearly all here are members of the National and this was threshed over very thoroughly at St. Louis. I don't know why it should be brought up again. We know that manufactured or so called artificial comb honey has not been made or placed upon the market, and there is no necessity of agitating that matter here at length. Mr. Wilcox — I read the proceedings of that convention at St. Louis, and I think all who have read it understand if anjihing is to be done it will need to come in a little different form from this. But I hardly see the necessity or advantage of trying to do anything. But if we do, we should need to put it in proper form or else we would create a wrong impression and say something we didn't intend. Mr. Whitney — It seems to me it would be better to let the individual who manufactures that pound of honey take the A. I. Root Company's $1,000 for it. I understand they have an offer, and have had it for years, to pay $1,000 to anybody who produces the proof. If I were going to manu- facture that pound of honey I would rather go to them. "What can this Association do to counteract the evil eflfect of the publication of the manufactured-comb-honey story in the press of the country? Can we do anything? If so, what?" Mr. Dadant — Publish statements to the contrary. Dr. Miller — I doubt very much the ability of this Asso- ciation as an association to do anything, but I don't at all doubt the ability of the individual members to do something by working through the local press. They can do a great deal in that direction. I doubt the wisdom of any action on the part of this Association. 128 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Mr. Whitney— On that question I have something in- teresting— to me, at least. I heard of a merchant in this city who sold a lady a case of honey, and the next day she sent it back and came in in a day or two after to tell him she had seat that honey back. She said, "That is manu- factured honey. It came from " South Water street ; it was made by machinery, and I never bought any such honey as that." He told her that she was mistaken, and convinced her it was not manufactured; that it was put in by the bees. She finally consented to let him send the honey back to her house. But there are plenty of people who really think that there is plenty of manufactured comb honey on the market. I meet them at home; intelligent people on ever3^hing else but bees and honey; they don't know anything about it. Mr. Moore — Some of your may think we are threshing this thing out at unnecessary length. My specialty has always been honey for private families. Some of us visit the people who eat our honey on their tables, and you will all admit that they are not quite the biggest chumps on earth that are running the city of Chicago, large and small, rich and poor; and I want to tell you, from all those people, of all conditions in life, comes this question, "Is comb honey really manufactured?" And they ask me as an expert to answer it. "Is most of the honey on the market manu- factured?" This comes to me in one hundred and . one different ways. I have one answer. Of course I say that all comb honey is pure honey. Some of you perhaps do not come in touch with these folks in the way I do, and you think it is a question that we are putting too much stress upon, but every one of you ought to carry the idea through your lives, that whenever you can you want to strike a blow in favor of the right. Dr. Emma Walker, in the Ladies' Home Journal, put forth a statement in which she said that one of the largest uses of paraffin was to make manufactured comb honey. Then and tiiereupon I wrote to her contra- dicting it, and I wrote to the editor saying that it was abso- lutely false, and it was wrong for any one in her position to put forth a statement that would injure a large number of people. Mr. York also wrote to the editor a personal letter. We both got answ«rs. I suppose that that depart- ment was flooded with letters from all over the country. We looked with a great deal of interest to see what would be done. Perhaps two months afterwards came the answer, an article in which she summed the thing up and said this and that authority said it was so; and that the Encyclopaedia Britannica said that there was manufactured comb honey, and gave four or five different authorities stating that comb honey was manufactured and paraffin was largely used. But she summed it up at the bottom by saying that "after talk- ing with practical bee-keepers and considering the matter in all its points we have decided that there is no such thing, and never has been, as manufactured comb honey." It was the result of our influence. Now, all of you go through life and remember to use your influence wherever you see the STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 129 opportunity. Wherever you see in the newspaper an article with this falsehood, go to the newspaper, or write, and have it contradicted, if possible, and do not let a single instance go by of contradicting this infamous lie that has been passed around from one end of the world to another. That is the way in which this Association, and we as individuals, can do good; whenever we see a head, hit it! Mr. Becker — It is a fact that there are many people who believe that there is adulteration both in comb and extracted honey. I sell honey right here in Chicago. I have bought it from Mr. York and from Mr. Dadant. I ship honey to Chicago. They wouldn't under any consideration buy the honey here in Chicago and believe that it actually was pure honey. They have told me so, time and again. I have tested the honey to-day that I shipped here ten years ago, and which has been kept in an open jar. I told them that the honey was too strong. They thought it was delicious. It was pure honey. A few years ago we brought in honey and I told some of the parties here that I would guarantee they would get pure honey here in Chicago, and I told them where to get it. They got some of it. They said, "Oh, that was not pure honey; that was not honey like you sent me." But it was pure. We all know that there is no adulteration in comb honey, but when it comes to extracted honey of course there is sometimes adulteration. There are so many varieties of honey; there is bass wood, white clover, alfalfa, Spanish- needle, heartsease, and other varieties of honey, and one does not taste or look like the other, especially sweet clover and basswood. You give them some of your honey and they have been used to white clover or alfalfa, and they just de- clare up and down, and you cannot make them believe that it is not adulterated honey. I have sold honey in Springfield for the last 20 years, and one traveler there accused me two weeks ago of having a monopoly because he couldn't sell any. I told him I was glad that I had the monopoly, if I had it. But the only way I got that monopoly was by selling them an article that I stood behind. I said, "If this honey isn't pure, and if anybody does not like it, don't argue with them, but tell them to bring it back and give them their money back ; it is my honey and I will take it off your hands." And to-day should I go to Springfield I am asked no ques- tions as to its purity. I simply ask, "Do you need any honey?" And they say, "Yes, two, three or four dozen, and as high as a gross." I never buy on the Chicago market. I don't send any honey here. I am right the other way; I take it from Chicago and sell it at other places; and I sell it at home, and I will stand behind my honey, and never sell anything but what I know is pure, genuine honey. If you all do the same thing I think you will have no trouble in selling your honey. Mr. Dadant — I wish to insist on the necessity of our explaining the comb-honey story wherever we can. We must do it. I have a better opportunity perhaps than any one else of finding out what the general public thinks of the 130 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT comb-honey story. When I travel I come across business men and we get into conversation. The first thing we ask one another is, "What is your business?" I say, "I have a little factory out here in the country." "What do you make?" "I make comb foundation." "What is that?" "Did you ever hear about comb honey being manufactured?" "Oh yes." "Well, there isn't any such thing. I make the nearest to comb that can be done." "Is that so?" Then comes the explanation. If I have a sample I show him and he is absolutely convinced there is no comb honey manufactured. But when I first meet him, if knows anything about it he knows comb honey is manufactured and sold ! I find very few people that do not believe it until it is explained to them. When I tell them, I know they believe me because there is no reason for me to tell them a story and they understand how the story was gotten up. But this extends to you ; it is absolutely necessary to make this matter known widely because there are millions of people who have read that story and believe it simply because they have never been told better. Mr. Smith — I want to say I have convinced some parties by exhibiting some of the thin foundation and explaining why it was used and how it was used, and that was all there was to it. It dawned on their minds finally that I was right. I think the more we do that, and the more we can explain this thing and talk it the better, because it is the fact, and it is easily demonstrated when we have the evidence, that is, the foundation, and show the people that that is all there is to it. I am like Mr. Becker, I believe in every bee-keeper standing by his honey. Pres. York — Before Mr. Smith spoke I was wondering whether it would. not be a good idea for every bee-keeper to carry a little piece of comb foundation; and I am going to suggest to the comb manufacturers that they get up a little pocket-holder with a piece of comb in it, and give it to all the bee-keepers. I think it would be a good advertise- ment for them. Mr. Abbott — If these comb-foundatioti men would find out when the Traveling Men's Association meets, and send some of this comb foundation there they would do more towards counteracting this than anything I know of. The traveling men who travel for wholesale houses do more to keep this story alive than any class of men in existence. I never met a traveling man' in my life, who was not a bee- keeper, that did not think that comb honey could be manu- factured. He wouldn't believe it at all when I came to talk to him. Every once in a while I meet one who wants to bet money on it. I met one in the streets of St. Louis one day, and he said when I told him it was not manufactured, "You are crazy. I know right where the man is ; he is down the street here not more than four blocks away, and he was talking to a man that knew well." I put my hand on the man's shoulder, and said, "Am I responsible for $500?" He said, "I think you are." I said, "My dear sir, come on down STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 131 the street with me and I will give you $500 in clean cash if you show me that man." He stopped and looked at me. He said, "I am awfully busy." I said, "Can you make $500 in a day, or an hour? Come on with me. I want you either to stop this story or else go and show the goods." He said, I didn't see it, but I saw a fellow that said he saw it." [Laughter.] That is all there was to it; but they keep send- ing it around. Mr. Becker — The general public confuse foundation with honey-comb. They are all well aware that there are fac- tories that manufacture comb foundation, but they call it "honey-comb." In that way the general public get the wrong idea, and they think it is the genuine honey-comb. Instead of that the word "foundation" should be used, and, as has been suggested, they should be shown a sample so that they understand just what it is. But it is commonly known as honey-comb, and that is the reasoin I believe the general public has that impression. Mr. Pease— A few months ago I placed some cases of honey with a firm here in Chicago. At the time I did this one of the gentlemen said, "I want you to tell me something that I can tell the enquiring public about this artificial honey- comb story." I said, "I will not take time to do it now, but I will come in tomorrow and explain that to you." The next day I went down and took with me a section with a full sheet of foundation that was partially drawn out — drawn out more at the top than at the bottom; I used the extra- thin foundation and the bottom had not been drawn out at all. I went on to explain to him the process by which this foundation was used, and how it was made, and that that was the extent of this artificial honey-comb. I left a sec- tion containing this partly-drawn foundation with him. Sev- eral weeks after that I went into the store and asked him about his honey, and spoke of this sheet of foundation that I had left with him ; and he said he had experienced more satisfaction in using that to explain to the public exactly what comb foundation was, and what artificial honey-comb was, than anything else he had ever seen. I simply offer this as a suggestion. I believe whenever you place a consign- ment of honey with a firm, especially a retail firm, if you will take the pains to place with them a sample of foundation or a section containing the foundation, or partly drawn foun- dation, you will take a long step in educating the public as to what this artificial honey-comb is. Mr. Wheeler — I always seem to have to differ from the public. I differ a little on this question of foundation, and I have had considerable experience in selling honey. I have explained foundation to the public, and I have had them go to their friends the next day and tell them, "Why, Wheeler had some manufactured honey there ;" and they confused the foundation with the comb, time and again. I have had that happen. They say, "He buys comb and puts it into the hives." One or two years I went to the County Fair and explained foundation to the folks. I had tliat thrown back 132 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT at me so many times that I made up my mind I never would speak of foundation at all unless people asked me if I used it. Of course I don't deny using it. But this explaining to the public that you put in a sheet of beeswax — they can't tell whether there is a "sell" there or not, and the trouble is you know how a story goes ; they will repeat the thing to their friends, and put an addition to it, and the first thing you know it will come around that you really furnish the bees with comb. Dr. Miller — "A little learning is a dangerous thing." The trouble in Mr. Wheeler's case is that he doesn't go on and educate them far enough, and keep right after them, and they will come finally to know enough. He gives them just a little sight of that, and they put a whole lot more to it. He should follow that up and show them it is not so. Get after them after they have heard the wrong thing. I do believe enlightenment on the subject will finally bring the public to the right place. I am just half German blood in me and sometimes it gets me into trouble. Mr. York sug- gested a thing that I had in mind, and by some sort of telepathy he got hold of it and told you to carry around foundation. That was a thing I had been thinking of be- fore, and if he had just waited a little while I would have said that. I believe there is wisdom in it. I have thought after this I will try to have a piece of foundation in my pocket. I don't doubt at all that these foundation makers will approve of that, for we will "draw out" a good deal of foundation in that way ! Mr. Whitney — I would like to make another suggestion in regard to advertising this matter. If we would all write a short article on this subject to our local editor; there is no individual here but can do that in his own locality and publish the facts in regard to this foundation business, this comb-honey business, and this extracted-honey adulteration. By doing that we will do a great deal more than we can do in any other way personally. The editor of our paper at home has been importuning me to write a series of short articles for his paper, and I have partly promised to do it on that very subject, and touching upon bee-keeping generally — all the little things and facts about it. I think if we will all do that in our local papers we will do more to correct this impression that has gone abroad than we can do in any other way, and do it easily; too. Mr. Meredith — Some three hundred car-loads of excur- sionists visited our Park the past season where I had an exhibit of bees, extracted wax, a press, and utensils used for the production of honey. Among those were comb founda- tion partly drawn out, finished and capped, and in almost every manner, and it was very interesting to tlie people as they had never seen the way extracted and comb honey was produced, in looking over and seeing how the foundation had been extended. And also I had a number of pieces of foun- dation coiled up in the shape of wax, and I used them for the purpose of selling, selling it for so much, taking an or- STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 133 dinary piece of foundation and winding it around a rod and selling that to them for beeswax. The biggest part of the people that looked over my exhibit could see what was con- sidered artificial comb was practically pure wax drawn out by the bees, and I think it had a big influence in the enlight- enment of people in regard to this artificial comb. Mr. Dadant — A gentleman over here spoke a while ago. He thought it was not advisable to let people know that there is foundation in combs. The question is only whether we shall allow the people to keep on believing a lie or tell them the plain truth. We do put foundation in our honey. In fact we cannot get straight sections without putting foundation in it. if we explain that we must explain to them we put foundation in the bottom. It is nothing to be ashamed of. Why not tell them that rather than allow them to believe a lie, for fear of telling them that honey-comb is manufactured and sealed over? I have never seen a lady, delicate as she may be, that was not willing to take a piece of that founda- tion and chew it. If they are willing to do that they are willing to eat the honey that is made on that foundation. Mr. Horstmann — I think each bee-keeper is responsible • for his own neighborhood. I don't agree with Mr. Wheeler. I believe you should explain to them the use of the founda- tion and why you use it. I will take people right into my bee-house and show them sections before they are bent and put together; show them the strips of foundation before they are put in; show them the machine I use for putting the foundation in, and for fastening it; show them how I fix up the supers ; shows them how I put it on the hives ; show them the bees working, and then guarantee to everybody that my honey will be absolutely pure. If they find any adultera- tion I will give them $100, and also pay for the analysis. I want people to be fully satisfied when they buy honey from me that they are getting it pure. I have never had to take any honey to a wholesale house ; I have always been able to sell it at home. Mr. Wheeler — I am afraid I was misunderstood. I have been selling honey a good many years. I aim to sell as much honey with as little work as possible. It would be a pretty hard job for me to explain to every customer who buys a pound of honey all about it, but I tell you one thing that proved to me very strongly that the idea of foundation went against the people? I have used for ten years a split section that showed the foundation on four sides. I put in four sections in a row, put sheets of foundation through the middle, the sheet of foundation running the full length of the section, and when I got ready to case up those sections I pulled the sections out and scraped the foundation off and went ahead and cased it up. A great many objected to that foundation. AH they saw was the foundation sticking out. The grocery men say, "I wish you would let me have sections that are not split; my customers object to those split sections." The con- sequence was I quit for the present using them. It is a very convenient section the best kind of section in the world to lS4 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT get filled out, but I had to cater to the trade and I did it just for that reason, no other, simply because people saw that foundation and they said, "Well, that looks as if it was manufactured; I am a little afraid of it." Mr. Kimniey — I would like to ask some of these prac- tical men when they speak of foundation drawn out what pro- portion of foundation is used in honey? I speak now of sec- tion honey; such as is produced by Dr. Miller's bees. Dr. Miller — 'That will depend largely on the foundation itself. Mr. Kimmey — Take the thin surplus foundation? Dr. Milller — I should say that the thin foundation is drawn out perhaps an eighth of an inch. Mr. Kimmey — So that you would not dare recommend your product as being the work of the bees without any artificial assistance. Dr. Miller — Certainly not if there is foundation in it. Mr. Kimmey — The question is whether we are to tell the truth about it or try to deceive them ; I believe the truth is the best. Dr. Miller — Certainly. I don't think any reasonable per- son would object to that, and I don't think an unreasonable person will object to that after you have explained it to him as much as he would without the explanation. Mr. Kimmey — I will confess I was one of those persons for two years who firmly believed honey was manufactured — comb honey, everything by machinery. I heard it so often. I knew so many things that I firmly believed the comb honey capping and everything was manufactured. I have found out differently since, but I have found out also that the founda- tion is manufactured. I can't say it is to the detriment of anybody, and I don't believe in trying to deceive or fool any- body. Mr. Bacon — When you come right down to it, foundation is not manufactured ; it is pure beeswax and is merely pressed out; it is originally made by the bees. Mr. Kimmey — If you can manufacture the full comb and fill it with the pure article, that is absolutely pure; it is just as good as though made by your bees. Mr. Meredith — I would like to have Mr. Dadant and Mr. Root give their opinion of how -much of the medium or light brood can be drawn out in the shape of foundation. Mr. Dadant — If you give foundation and the bees are not too much in a hurry they will draw it nearly entirely into comb. There is a great difference in the result between when the bees are in a hurry and when they are not. If they are in a hurry and they have plenty of wax they will add to the foundation without drawing it much. They will always work the foundation over. They have changed the shape of it; they have changed it to suit themselves. They always thin it a little if they have plenty. I suppose you understand that clearly. Of course it is according to the grades of foundation, you have thicker or thinner combs both into the midrib and also in the wall. The first is always the best for comb honey. STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 135 What we call extra-thin we have always considered the best for starters or sheets in the supers. I think very little of that will go into the cell-wall. It will nearly all remain in the midrib because it is so very thin. " Therefore, I want . to advise people to use the very thinnest for their sections. But when you come to medium and light brood, it is out of the question to furnish that to people for consumption. You will have a heavy midrib in either case. I am afraid too many people use that and create a sentiment against the foundation. But better have a sentiment against the founda- tion, which we must all know and acknowledge to be there, than to let them believe that your honey is manufactured comb honey, and sealed over with a hot iron, as so many ibelieve. The great trouble is they don't look and don't rely on their palate. The car-loads of honey that come in from the West are largely responsible for that. It is very nice and white, and it looks as if it had never been on a hive, to anybody who does not know. But anybody who will look at the honey, and anybody who can be told that no two sections are alike, will readily understand that it cannot , be manufactured. Because, if we were to manufacture them we could not make every comb different from every other comb. Pres. York — It has been suggested we write for our local papers. I want to say that a few weeks ago my attention was called to a statement about manufactured comb honey in one of the papers that has perhaps several hundred thou- sand readers. I wrote the editor asking him to make the correction, and he replied that he believed comb honey was manufactured, but if he found otherwise he would correct it. A few weeks later I received another letter from him saying he had discovered it was not true, and he would correct it. I wrote him at once and thanked him for his intention to make the correction. I also said if he wished I would write him an article, and got a letter in a few days saying he would be glad to have me write an article of eight hundred or a thousand words, and I have just written the article. It may have been a little presumption on my part to offer that, but I think it was all right, and I think the rest of us can do the same thing. Whenever you see anything about honey that is wrong, ask for the correction of it, and offer to write an article. EVENING SESSION. At 7 :30 o'clock p. m. Pres. York called the convention to order and stated that before proceeding with the business they would be favored with some music and a couple of readings. Master Ferdinand Moore and Miss Esther Wheeler, fa- vored the convention with instrumental solos; Mrs. Dittmer pleased them with a reading entitled, "A Lullaby," while 136 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Dr. Miller convulsed the audience by a reading showing how a certan German was cured of rheumatism by the bee-stings. ADVERTISING HONEY AS A HEALTH FOOD. '"What can this Association do in the line of advertising that will show the value of honey as a health food in the newspaper press?" Dr. Miller — I think perhaps the Association will do about as much as it can be expected to do in that direction by the publication of this report, in getting in the things that were said here to-day and encouraging the publication of items in the local press. 'v BREAKING DOWN PRICES OF HONEY. "What can this Association do along the lines of pre- venting bee-keepers themselves from breaking down the prices of honey early in the marketing season?" Mr. Wilcox — That is the most important question we have to consider ; at least it has been with me all my life. We have never found a solution, and I don't believe we ever will. I believe that the best advice we ever had on that subject was that given by our late friend, Thomas G. Newman, when he advised us to work the home market, to see it was always supplied with all the honey it could take. The aim should be to increase the consumption. It is quite certain that there is not as much honey consumed as there can be, and should be, and would be if it were propeily presented to all people. It involves an extensive system of advertising, and that has been told over and over again by Mr. Abbott and others, and yourself, Mr. President, and I believe that it is in the right direction. I can't think of anything better to get the world to know it is good, and use it. I propose to try a little scheme of m^ own of honey and buckwheat cakes, simply because they are two com- modities in which I feel interested. I believe the two will work well together, and the consumption of one will help the consumption of the other, for anything that will tend to increase the consumption of one will help the other. Pres. York — I think the price of honey is lowered by some bee-keepers not knowing what honey is worth starting out with the price too low. Mr. Wilcox — The remedy for that, so far as my own locality is concerned, has been by some one who does know the value of honey, or can learn it, in the seasofi buying up all the cheaper lots and putting them upon the market at the proper price. Mr. Whitney — It seems to me that the way to furnish a good market for honey is to produce the very best article you can, and make people believe it. I have known honey to be sold at 15, 16, 18 and 20 cents a section right in a community where much honey was selling for 10 cents, simply because they knew that the honey they were paying STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 137 the higher price for was all right. I think every bee-keeper ought to do the very best he can, not be slipshod, not have dirty-looking sections, not have one full of holes all around, or perhaps not filled at the bottom of the section at all. Produce the best article you can, and make people believe it is all right, and set your own price. Dr. Miller: — I suppose that nearly all here have been taught to believe by the newspapers that they need a biscuit. Pick up any newspaper and "Uneeda biscuit" will stare you in the face. Thousands and thousands of dollars are evi- dently spent in advertising that one style of biscuit. Those men are not spending money for fun; they are not wasting money, either ; they are level-headed men, with a standard article that needs money spent in advertising it. Is there any question that a proper amount of advertising of honey would bring in returns. Is Mr. France here? I was just wondering whether he would agree with my statement or not. Yes, there he is. Mr. France, I want to see if you will agree with me. If the money that has been spent by the National Association helping to settle quarrels were spent in adver- , tising honey in the public press, somewhat in the same way that "Uneeda Biscuit" is being advertised, I believe it would do more good, just a little more, at least, towards raising the standard of honey all over the country. Now if you don't believe that, Mr. France, say so. Mr. France — I endorse it. Dr. Miller — Good for you. I believe that is a point in the right direction. You ask what can this Association do? If this Association could get enough money into its treasury to help in that same direction that would be a good thing. For at least this Association is helping to make the National what it ought to be, and I am speaking for one only when I say that I believe there is a great work for the National before it to advertise honey, to put a lot of money in. It will take a lot of money. But if the thousands upon thou- sands of bee-keepers in the country could be got into it there would be money enough to do some good. I know very well some of you will say it will take so much money you need not try it at all. If you can suggest something better I will take that back. Mr. Moore — There is a thought that occurs to me, dif- ferent from anything that has been expressed by anybody else. I was one of those who went to the Illinois Legislature and helped them to get a law two years ago for bee-keepers — and an appropriation. In the midst of other things this im- pressed itself upon my mind : The faith and confidence that the Legislature and the public at large have in associations. There is so much crookedness in the world at large that people are skeptical about anything they don't know anything about. For instance, take this question of manufactured comb honey: The public at large do not know any more about comb honey or foundation than a week-old baby does about arithmetic or the dictionary, until they are taught by the specialist, and they decide the worst possible thing out 138 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT of their absolute ignorance on the subject. But they look upon our associations, the bee-associations, the dairymen's as- sociations, the fruit men's associations, and anything com- ing from those associations, and put forth in a formal manner, as the act of those associations, and give full credence. Witness the Dairymen's Association got through the law establishing a pure food commission. I think I am correct in saying there would be no such law on the statute book to- dav unless the dairymen had talked it and worked for it. Another thing, three or four associations were given appro- priations 'by the Legislature two years ago. They give the Illinois State Bee-Keeper's Association $2,000. They did that because the association asked for it, and they took at one hundred percent all the statements made by the asso- ciation. Now, let us, along with the National, advertise in such papers as seems best, "Buy your honey of members of the National Bee Keepers' Association," or other associa- tions, according to your judgment, and continue that year after year, not at large perhaps, but somewhere every month in the year for five years. After a while everybody who reads the English language will know that there is honey sold that is guaranteed by the name of the National Bee Keepers' Association, and people will come to inquire for honey under the brand and guarantee of the bee-keepers' association. That has been done for ten years now in Ver- mont. The Vermont Maple Sugar Makers' Association issues a very fine report every year, and I have had the pleasure of reading two or three of them, and one of their methods was to go to the Legislature and get as stringent a law as they could. Then they have adopted a brand which is issued to all members of the Vermont Maple Sugar Makers' Asso- ciation. It is a general brand which is copyrighted or trade- marked, which ever it is, and there is a blank for each mem- ber to put in his own individual name and address, and there is a penalty against any one using this except authorized parties. It seems to me that is perfectly feasible, when you take into consideration the public minds, and advertising would be a way to spend some of our money. Mr. Becker — Those bee-keepers that are taking the bee- papers and are paying annual fees here, claim to get a fair price for their honey. Now, suppose we advertise, you have a certain element to contend with that almost give their honey away. You go through the country, and even in my section of country, I can cite you 25 or 35 that have from 5 to 50 colonies of bees, and one of our own members of the Illinois' Bee-Keepers' Association a few years ago sold her honey at 10 cents a pound, as fine white clover honey as ever was put on the market. The storekeepers themselves said, ''We would just as soon give her 12^ cents as 10 cents." The past summer I knew of one case where a man sold 1,000 pounds of honey at 8 cents a pound — ^fine white clover honey. I was after the honey myself, but happened to be just one day too late, and he wouldn't sell any quantity, but he wanted to sell the entire lot at 8 cents a pound. Last year I bought 1,000 STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 139 pounds of honey at 9 cents a pound in the same locality. I could have bought 5,000 pounds more at 8 cents. What are you going to do with those that know the price, and hold the better honey at simply a fair price? The past summer, when I wanted to sell my honey, I had to run up against honey sold at 12^ cents a pound and I bought 12 cases myself and gave 135^ for it to the storekeeper. The storekeepers are just about as smart as we are. You come into the city with a thousand pounds of honey on j'Our wagon and you want to sell it. You bring it to a store and they say, "Well, we will give you so much money for it." If you are a stranger in that city you probably can drive all over it and you can't get any more money for it, and you blight as well have taken the first bid in order to get rid of your honey. These grocery keepers have an organization that is called the Retail Grocery Association. When a fellow comes in, the first man he strikes makes an offer. If you could stay around you would probably see him go to his telephone and watch the honey man, to see which direction he is going, and then telephone to his next friend, "There ,is a man in town with so much honey; I made an offer of so much money;" that is when there is an abundance of honey. If the article is scarce then they buy it. But you will always have to contend with the bee-keepers who do not know the prices and do not care. They bring their honey in- to market early, and you men that have honey and are try- ing to make a living have to hold on until that honey is out of the way, and is consumed, before you get better prices. You have to contend with these parties that do not take a bee-paper, and, don't know the price of honey nor how much honey there is in the country. They sell it for whatever they can get. They go to the store and take it out in other commodities, while you want to get the cash for it ; and they always sell it for less money than we can. The balance of the evening session was in the hands of Ernest R. Root, who delivered a very interesting lecture, copiously illustrated with stereopticon views, also with mov- ing pictures. SECOND DAY— Morning Session. December 1, 1904. At 9 :50 a. m. Pres. York called the convention to order and requested Dr. Miller to invoke the divine blessing. Dr. Miller — Our Father, we thank Thee for another night's rest. Prepare us for the work of the day. We pray Thee that the same kind feelings, and the same kind spirit, may prevail here to-day as did on the past day. We thank Thee for the acquaintances of the other bee-keepers, and that we may meet together in a kindly spirit and discuss the things in which we are mutually interested. We pray. Oh God, for Thy blessing upon us. Wilt Thou care for the dear ones at our respective homes. May we feel that they are safe 140 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT under Thy care. We pray that Thy blessing may be upon us as bee-keepers, and we learn something to-day. May we go from here better men and women; better fitted to do the work that our Heavenly Father has for us to do here upon the earth. Bless the President and the other officers. May the President have just the wisdom he ought to have to direct aright the proceedings of this convention. We pray that Thou wilt bless all the members. Lead us in all we do. Lead us, we pray Thee, through life; lead us up to the time when we shall leave all the things of this world, and may we unitedly come up to enjoy the life beyond through all eternity. We ask it in Christ's name. Amen. REPORT OF THE INSPECTOR OF APIARIES. We will call upon Mr. Smith, the State Inspector of Illi- nois, to open this subject, and tell us about his work. Mr. Smith — Really, I do not believe that I can add to what has already been so often told the bee-keepers by Mr. France, and by Mr. Moore here in his remarks yesterday. However, I will give an outline of what I have done the past year. The way I do my work is by going to places from which I get invitations to come. I don't go out and hunt up foul brood, only in the neighborhood where I find foul brood; we as a rule go around to the adjoining neighbors that have bees and inspect them. During the last season I visited thirty-two counties in this State, just about one-third of the counties, probably — it would be a good one-third with Mr. Moore's work in Cook County. I find that the bee- keepers are very anxious to know all about foul brood, and how to treat it, and they are very apt to learn also. They are very anxious to inform other bee-keepers how to treat it. Of course there is only one way that I treat foul brood and that is to destroy the comb. I don't try formaldehyde or any otha'r disinfectant; T remove the bees and destroy the comb — that is, the brood-combs. I cleanse the hives out and re-hive the j bees again on foundation or empty frames. I thirik^hat the work is in fair progress, and another year or two will show that the work that has been commenced will bear good fruit. The diseased locations are found mostly in the north part of the State and along the Mississippi River in the north and south parts of the State, also along the Indiana line. I found foul brood in only one county in the central part of the State. Of course there may be foul brood in every county in the State so far as I know, but I think the bee-keepers, as a rule, are reading up, and that is one way we ought to work — through the press, and the mail, and educate the bee-keepers so that they can take care of their own bees. The bee-keepers as a rule, are very anxious to have the Inspector come, and they are very pleasant people to be with. In fact, I believe that the bee-keepers are intelligent and progressive, and are very friendly. There doesn't seem to be any jealousy existing among them, that one is afraid that his neighbor will produce STATi: nF.E-KF.F.l'KRS ASSflCT ATTOV. Ill more- lioney llian lu" (l' enou.uh. Some 1 have given as short a lime as fcnu" or five days, hut 1 think the best i)lan is yi' y-r^-r-'r^i^W' 142 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT to be sure that the honey is all exhausted ; and if it is in a time when there is no honey-flow the bees want to be fed. Mr. Kimmey — How about the young that have been started in two weeks, or would they start? Mr. Smith — You cut that comb out and melt it up into wax. Mr. Kimmey — Suppose that the disease is carried by the honey that the bees have at the time they make the first change, won't the disease go on with the next brood? Mr. Smith — You will find very little brood in the new comb. Of course it would be in the very young larval stage. The disease never attacks the young bees until they get in the state called the- grub state. After the bees become in the nymph state the disease never attacks them. I have never found any that were killed after taking the form of the nymph, with legs and wings. Mr. Kimmey — ^Before that time w.on't the bees that have become infected with the honey carry that infection to the brood that is started in two weeks? Mr. Smith — I think not. I don't think that the disease can be developed in two weeks. At least I have never found any disease. I have had some parties that didn't change their bees back into the second frames until they had capped brood, and I found no disease there. Mr. Kimmey — Won't it then be better to put them on empty frames the first time? Mr. Smith — I think it would, because it has a tendency for them to exhaust their honey in building new comb. Mr. Kimmey — And afterwards destroy them and put them on full foundation. Mr. Smith — Put them on full foundation the second change. Pres. York — I would like to ask in how many apiaries Mr. Smith found disease, and what percent he visited ? Mr. Smith — The percent I visited was probably 90. Pres. York — Do you know how many apiaries you visited ? Mr. Smith — I have a record of that, but I didn't bring it with me. Pres. York — How many colonies did you examine? Mr. Smith— Over 2,000. Mr. Swift — Is the disease exterminated by melting the wax? Does heat destroy it?. Mr. Smith — Yes. Mr. Dadant can tell that. He gets thousands of pounds ©f wax sent in, extracted from diseased colonies, and he has never had any complaint against it. Mr. Pease — Will you give us a plan by which the per- son who never saw foul brood will recognize it? Mr. Smith — Did you ever smell a carpenter's glue-pot? It puts me in mind of the young man who went to the medical college. When he returned home they wanted to know all about it. He says, "Now I will tell you, If you had seen what I have seen, and felt what I have felt, and smelt what I have smelt, you would know all about it." [Laughter.] If STATE BEE-KEEPERS* ASSOCIATION. 143 you smell that foul brood once you will never forget it It smells as nearly like a carpenter's glue-pot as anything you can get. Mr. Wilcox — Don't you find foul brood sometimes with- out smell? Mr. Smith — Where it is not fully developed all over the hive and it is just the first inoculation, you may sometimes find a comb of beautifully sealed brood and just three or four cells that are affected, but it doesn't take long for it to spread. Mr. Wheeler — I would like to go bade a little bit. In regard to this treatment that you speak of, the bees are first shaken out at the beginning of the honey-flow, or "shook -out," and they are put on empty frames. Our bees gathered the whole year's crop in two weeks' time. Now, there is a very tender point right there, whether you leave those bees in the hive two weeks and then take them off those combs they have built in those two weeks and melt those combs up. If it is not necessary to do that it would be a great loss of money to the bee-keeper. If two days or 48 hours would do, that would be a great deal better than two weeks. Mr. Smith — Two days or 48 hours would not suffice — four • days at least. I wouldn't make the change under that time. While it is a fact that they do not always carry the disease with them — I have known swarms to come out of the in- fected hives, and I have hived them on foundation and they didn't carry the disease with them at all. It seems they exhaust the honey before the young brood gets large enough to take the disease; especially if it is a second swarm and the young queen doesn't get to laying for a few days, the brood is later than the laying queen would be. Mr. Wheeler — Some of the money that is used ought to be used to experiment along that line. It makes a great difference to us bee-keepers, if we know just how much time there should be. I have had a little experience, and I have shaken them out on combs, that is, just one comb with a little brood in and fresh-laid eggs, and those bees showed no signs of the disease for a year or two, no more than bees shaken out on empty frames ; why that was I can't tell. They were no more affected than bees that were shaken out on empty combs and given new comb. The object was to save all the bees possible. Mr. Smith — In making my trips I cannot go back to every man's yards in four or five days afterward and change his bees, I only leave my orders with him. I have gone back on several occasions where my trip was near there, and found some of them had not transferred them at all. They got busy, it was haying time, and the oats had to be hauled in, and with one thing and another they didn't have time, and they didn't like to bother with them; they were afraid of being stung, and they didn't transfer them back at all. Mr. Hutchinson — In all my experience with foul brood I have never cut the combs out, as you speak of. I either shake them on starters or full sheets of foundation, and I never had another case of foul brood come on. In other iiw^'^i' ;'a&»^.!i:; r.'ij 144 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT words, I haven't found it necessary to make that second shake. Mr. Smith — That is according to the rules that are laid down by Mr. McEvoy. My experience has been the same as Mr. Hutchinson's. Mr. Hutchinson — I wouldn't like to say it was never necessary, but I say in my experience I have not found it necessary. Mr. Smith — I have not found any to develop the second time, unless it was taken from other infected colonies. Mr. Kimmey — From your experience with infected brood, is it your opinion that you would find after the first trans- fer that that colony would be saved, whatever way it was treated ? Mr. Smith — Oh, yes, where it is done in the early part of the season ; and it depends a good deal on the fall flow ; but a great many of them have done well. Mr. Kimmey — Would there be much loss in the first two weeks ? Mr. Smith — I believe you can gain by making the change and putting them on full sheets of foundation because the bees draw it out and you have a full sheet of workers and the queen will fill those new combs. They are not clogged with honey or pollen; and I have had a great many swarm within four weeks after being transferred. Mr. Wheeler — I think there would be a great loss there right along this line. You people ought to be pretty careful when you go to work. We bee-keepers who are interested financially, and have all our money in the business, do not want to have the inspector come along that is careless in regard to our financial welfare, as well as the bees. Now if it is not absolutely necessary to allow those bees two weeks' time before you cut out the combs, we don't want to have to do it. In regard to this man asking if that colony is of any value, it certainly is of value. The colonies in the spring may show a little of that disease, and they want shaking out and may gather hundreds of pounds of comb honey in that season. And right there is where you people ought to be a little careful. We ought to have scientific investiga- tion; we ought to have some definite knowledge to go by, and not be haphazard about it, and have a man come along and say two or three days or two weeks, it doesn't matter. We must understand what we are doing. It is a matter of thousands of dollars of importance to us. Mr. Smith — I said two weeks. I said that is as long a period as I have known parties to let their bees remain and change them.; But (about four days is what I Itell them. Leave those in till they have exhausted the honey, about four days, and then change them back onto other frames or foundation. Mr. Wilcox — Wouldn't it be better to put them on empty frames than foundation? Mr. Smith — I do, as a rule, but a great many men have STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 145 starters of foundation in their frames, and they don't want to take the starters out. Mr. Whitney — You said you found foul brood in this region along the west part of the State, and along the In- diana line. Do you conclude from that that foul brood is prevalent along water courses, or in damp, low locations, rather than dry? Mr. Smith — I can't say as to that. Mr. Whitney — It seems to me that it would be an index if you found it in that locality and not in the dry ones. Mr. Smith — I found some counties along the Illinois River from Peoria south until we get down to Pike county, where I have not heard of any foul brood. When you get down to Pike county there seems to be considerable of it. Mr. Dadant — I think I have an answer to that ques- tion, whether foul brood will be produced in damp places. Colorado is about as dry a State as there is, and, I believe there is more foul brood to the thousand colonies there than there is in Illinois. California is a very dry State, and they have considerable foul brood. I think a great many colonies has more to do with foul brood than temperature or moisture. , We find when things are congregated in large numbers there is more chance of disease ; that cities have more disease than farms. In the production of crops a small vineyard will have very little of the black rot, but put them together and it will start somewhere and spread through the vineyard; and I believe you will find the same thing where large vine- yards are, and where a number of bees are kept together. I believe that is the main secret of all the diseases. I would like to add with regard to foul brood, it is very difficult to say some things positively in regard to the treatment, as I believe there are different degrees of foul brood, as there are different diseases of the throat. Some foul brood is more malignant than others. Therefore you need more care, in which case the inspector has to judge as to how much care he should use. In regard to beeswax, I have never had foul brood at home. We have bees in the apiary where we have our comb foundation making. We get beeswax from all parts of the Union and foreign countries ; our bees have access to the beeswax before it is melted. We find it diffi- cult when we take in materials to have very close-fitting doors, so they are opened most of the time in the summer, and we have the bees in there a good part of the time; we have never had any foul brood from it. Therefore I con- clude it is impossible for beeswax to give foul brood, and the reason is this : When beeswax is melted it soaks into whatever it touches. If you dip your finger in hot beeswax you find it very difficult to work it out, although the mois- ture in the body would be apt to throw it out. Take one of those foul-brood germs and soak it in beeswax, and you deaden it and render it absolutely harmless, and it surely could not reproduce itself. Mr. Reynolds — Mr. Smith states that a swarm hived on foundation with a young queen is not as likely to have foul 146 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT brood as the swarm shaken from a colony would be. Would it not answer the purpose, instead of keeping those bees so long, on foundation, to catch the queen and prevent her from laving, as Mr. Smith says, and close the entrance for four days and they would consume the honey, no matter what the horiey-flow would be? Mr. Smith — That would be a very good idea, I think, to catch the old queen to keep her from laying. It takes a brood or an egg to develop, I think it is nine days until it The late Mrs. I<. Harrison. comes into a fully-developed pupa — as we call it when it fills the cell ready to cap; that is the time that foul brood attacks the larva ; and after the bees cap it, then it goes into the nymph state. I have never yet found any bees in that stage of growth or development that were affected with foul brood. It seems that the tissue of it gets so tough that the spores do not enter it. Mr. Moore — One gentleman has raised the question as to the great damage that is likely to be done to a bee- keeper by the inspector. I want to ask these people who have had experience in this matter, what is the probable < -c^ .'-*> tJ«Hk<^< STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 147 profit from a colony of bees that has foul brood during the season, supposing they are run for honey? Never mind the question of getting rid of the disease, but what profit will you have from those diseased colonies through the season? And what is the damage to the honey crop by the legitimate treatment ? Mr, Root — If I might answer that question, from my own experience I would say, generally speaking, there would be no profit. If the colony could hold its own, if I allowed the disease to run and didn't do anything with it, it would be not a case of profit, but a case of profit and loss, with par- ticular emphasis on the word "loss," with the chance of in- fecting the other colonies. Mr. Re3molds — ^Some inspectors might be a little more partial with some than others. There is a point there to look at. Mr. Snell — I would like to ask Mr. Smith if he has found any foul brood in the northwestern part of the State? Mr. Smith — Yes, sir; in Whiteside county there is a good deal of it. Mr. Wilcox — I want to get this clear to my own mind. * I have never found foul brood in my apiary, and I hope I never will. I understand from all I have read of it that the disease is transmitted only through honey. Is that correct? Mr. Dadant — I believe that is a mistake. Cheshire de- scribed foul brood as Bacillus alvei, and he found it even in the body of the queens. Now, of course, I couldn't answer for what Cheshire said, but he is one of the best authors on bee-culture. Cheshire was a scientific man, but he was not practical ; he was not a man who produced honey. He found germs of foul brood in all parts of the hive. In cases v/here you cure it so readily I don't believe you have the true, dangerous foul brood. Therefore I think we should be very particular. I don't think we can go any too far. Where you cure it by simply transferring the bees, that is well. I don't think you should expect to do it in every instance. I be- lieve there are dangerous cases where .you will have to transfer the bees and destroy the combs, over and over again. I don't believe you should stand to the statement that foul brood is only in honey. Mr. Root — Prof. Harrison gave a paper on that in the Canadian report in which he stated he had found the Bacillus alvei in the ovaries of the queen, as Cheshire has said. But I wish to say, in opposition to that, I have personally intro- duced queens, from ithe worst colonies w« have had, into healthy ones, time and time again, and never saw the disease carried in that way. I don't mean to say it cannot be done, though. But the experience so far as I know over the country has been to the effect that queens may be taken out of these diseased colonies and put into others, and the disease was not transmitted. Why, that is so I don't know, but that is the practical result of it. Mr. Dadant — Perhaps in this matter the scientific men are deceived by some circumstances. Now, where a man 148 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT dissects a queen he evidently has to kill her, and those germs of Bacillus alvei are very difficult to produce. It may be a colony partly infected. When he examined the queen the germs have developed since the death of the queen, or in such a way that if the queen had been alive and well she would not have had any germs. At the same time, we must be very cautious and not assert. In this disease it is better to be over-cautious than insufficiently cautious. Therefore, I be- lieve we should be very careful. In regard to 'boiling, I believe it is a mistake to say it will take three hours of boiling to destroy the germs. At the same time there are The late Thomas G. Newman, First Honorary Member Illinois State Association. men who have found germs after three hours of boiling. It may be they got those germs in a short time after the boiling, before they made the examination, and I am in- clined to believe that, because I think anything that is boiled in the matter of life will die. But in such a , dangerous disease we must be very careful in asserting the danger does not exist under such and such circumstances. We may say it is not probably. As Mr. Root says he has not found it, therefore I would be inclined to think he is right, but at the same time we must be very careful not to assert the disease does not exist in all parts of the hive. Dr. Miller — Calling attention to a point that might be misunderstood in what Mr. Dadant has said, the fact that the germs of foul brood may be found in the body of the STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 149 queen, does it necessarily follow that the disease will be conveyed by that? It may be there without being conveyed. But going back to the point before: Will foul brood be carried in any other way than by the honey of the hive? If the germs be carried from a diseased colony, no matter what from, the disease may be conveyed to another hive. The germs are in the brood. Isn't it possible that that might be carried, sometimes, as well as the honey? I sup- pose it is true that the honey is the principal medium, and the usual medium, through which the disease is conveyed, but surely it is not the only medium. If the diseased part itself of the brood be in any way carried from one colony to another, that would surely carry the disease. Mr. Wheeler — That is a good point the Doctor makes, and one that is very important. The bees are continually taking out that dead brood. I believe when the disease first starts they keep it all clean. I believe the hive for months is perfectly free of any signs of foul brood, and yet they have it and we don't know it. They keep carry- ing out every bit of foul matter and finally they have to give up in despair. All this time that foul- brood has been carried on the bottom-board and after a while some of it is left. Now, the question is. Is the foul matter that is carried out infectious? That is something worth inquiring into. The question is whether we had better fumigate our hives and burn them out or not. Some say yes, and some say no. It is an important question. Mr. Abbott — This whole question hinges on how the dis- ease gets into the animal. We lose sight of that sometimes. Take for instance some germ diseases that are communicated to human beings, such as tuberculosis in which the germ that produces that must find a lesion some place. If -tthere is a lesion on the outside of the body in some of the glands and it lodges there it will take root and produce the disease, so that you have tuberculosis of the different organs. It is not always in the lungs. A great many people die of con- sumption that never had anything the matter with their lungs ; that is, from tuberculosis. As I understand, the develop- ment of the germ of foul brood is only in the larva. In what way does the germ get into the larva? Does it get into it by contact and communicate itself by coming in contact with the larva, or is it taken in by the alimentary canal? There are some diseases that the human family get that are taken in by the water they drink, such as typhoid fever, and must be taken in in that way; they cannot be communicated by coming in contact with a gland, but they must come in contact with the inside of the human body somewhere along the alimentary canal, mostly in the lower bowels in typhoid fever. Now, then, if foul brood is a de- velopment in the larva, in the alimentary canal, and it can only be communicated by passing in in that way and coming in contact with certain portions of the larva, then it must be something that the larva will eat, to have the disease communicated. The larva does not eat anything but honey. 150 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT or the thing that might be mixed in the honey. Now, what- ever does not mix with the food of the larva cannot carry the disease, as I understand it. So that the question is,- What condition of things must exist in order that this germ be in the stuff that is fed to the larva? Because the germ is harmless in honey, is harmless every place so far as the disease is concerned, except it is in the alimentary canal of the larva; and if there is not some way by which it gets in there, it is as harmless as a chunk of sand, as I understand it. It only gets in through the feed, and they only feed bees honey, and the hive may be covered with the germs and not affect it in the least. Mr. Dadant — I think Mr. Abbott was asking me the question. I think he is very correct in that matter, and the fact is, I was about to rise to make the same sugges- tion, with this addition, that it is stated by authorities that formic acid, "which is the constituent of the poison of the bees, is an antidote for foul brood, and that would explain why the bees never have foul brood and never suffer from it. The bee carries its necessary antidote with it. It is quite likely that the disease could only be transferred to the larva by or through the honey, or through other larvae which, of course, would pass it to the bee, and the bee pass it back to the larva in feeding. It seems to me that is very con- clusive^. At the same time, if there are any germs at all in the hive, and they can be passed at all so as to be fed to the larvae, it will promote it. Mr. Wheeler — You know if you put a clean super on a hive of old combs and the bees go to work there, they will drag from those old combs out onto the new comb and jwill color them. Now isn't it possible for the bees to travel Ifrom the bottom-board around this bad brood and drop those had spores? Such questions as that are of vital importance, and I think a little of the money that is raised ought to be used for investigation, not entirely for going around and doing this business. While I think you know all these points, some man ought to be hired and paid for his time. It is either yes or no; they either give that disease in that way or they don't, and some man ought to be able to find it out. Mr. Swift — I think the bee-keepers will find the treat- ment of foul brood is something like the practice of medicine. What was first-class practice 25 years ago is bad to-day, and it is only by experimenting and testing that we will ever get at the right thing. There is no question — I found a doctor here just the other day who told me that operations that were frequent two years ago are condemned to-day by the bulk of the profession, that is, by the advanced profes- sion, and yet they were the popular and proper thing tw6 years ago. It may be the same thing in regard to foul brood. Tentative work is the only thing. Mr. Root — Mr. Abbott has struck the key-note, it seems to me, as to how foul brood is transmitted. If we take Mr. McEvoy's experience, and the experience of foul-brood in- spectors, it does not seem to be transmitted by the hive ex- '-■.' 6 ,-i-Se't.i,v'^&^?^^'- STATE BEE-KEEPERS ASSOCIATION. 151 cept through the honey, and if this theory is correct it solves nearly all the trouble. The danger lies in shaking the combs and using them over again, because in shaking the combs you may shake the honey onto the hives. Mr. Wilcox — I am not going to shed any light on the subjecty but I wanted to finish the thought presented by Mr. Wheeler. He said we should spend some of this money for investigation. So far as I am concerned, and many others, we came here for that very purpose, to investigate. I didn't know where to go to find men better informed on the subject. F. Wilcox. I don't know how to conduct an examination or investigation that .would be more satisfactory than to be at a convention with such men as we have here. If we cannot learn it from the combined wisdom of previous bee-keepers in the country, I don't know where to find it. That is the way to spend the money. Pres. York — I think Mr. Wheeler meant that we should have scientific investigation by scientific men. Mr. Moore — I want to take exception to Mr. Wheeler's remarks. He says we must not go ahead with this thing until we know exactly where we stand. That would apply 152 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT to everything in the world. You must not try to keep bees until we know all about it. How do we learn except by starting and using the things we know? The idea that we should not try till we know all about it is all bosh. Where would our medical profession have been on that basis? Mr. Wheeler says the bees will take these germs and scatter them all around, and then those foul-brood germs will get every- where. Dr. Howard gives the answer to that. By exposing foul-brood germs to light, air and dust they die. We know that light and air and dust are present everywhere. Ask your wife, if you don't believe it. And those foul-brood germs scattered anywhere are exposed to light and air and dust, and that is fatal to them. Some more scientific man than myself can tell you how soon. Two of our members have said that which is an insult to our intelligence, and to inspectors everywhere ; they say we are going to favor cer- tain parties; that we are going to be prejudiced; that we are not going to do right. Every man who has ever gone around inspecting bees knows that is not true. We are meeting everybody, and I tell you we are human ; we want people to like us ; we want to be popular, and the way to do that is to do right, and to be just, and honest, and help our brothers where we are right. Dr. Miller — How can you favor? Mr. Kimmey — By skipping foul brood and saying it is not foul brood. Dr. Miller — Suppose you do skip a man, would you favor that man by doing it? Mr. Kimmey — Of course you wouldn't. Mr. Wheeler — I was misquoted, or misunderstood. I didn't say it was best to do nothing till we found out every- thing. That is a misstatement. I don't mean that. I didn't say anything of the kind. I believe all such investigations are good, but I believe there is no use going to an extreme in the matter, and doing things that are unwarranted, until we have good ground. Mr. Reynolds — I will relate my experience in that regard. Mr. Moore came to my place last July about 20 minutes to 12, and asked how my bees were getting along, and I told him pretty fairly. He said. "Have you any trouble?" I said, "Yes, with one hive ; it is marked there. He said. Light the smoker and we will go and see it." We lit the smoker, and just then my wife put her head out of the door and said dinner was ready, so we went and had dinner. That was the end of it. A neighbor of mine acknowledges that his apiary is rotten with foul brood, but a short distance from me ; he hasn't the money to clean it up. I sent Mr. Moore to somebody else whose apiary was fairly rotten with it, and he left orders there as to what was to be done. The man came to me to ask me to help him out, and I told him I didn't like to go there amongst his bees for fear I would carry it home. Mr. Moore said to me he would be ghd to put in a few days more if he only got his expenses. I told him to write to him and get his address. This man is worth STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 153 over $50,000 and would gladly pay to have it done. He wrote to Mr. Moore and the letter never came back, and Mr Moore has never answered. I was there nine times trying to get that man to do it. His wife said to me he would be fined if he didn't have this done, by the State. After that I could do nothing. The bees are all hanging in five frames in soap- boxes to-day. Mr. Moore — I had no appropriation for answering let- ters, but I paid the postage and answered every letter as far as I know. It was wholly unintentional if anybody was neglected. I answered a number of inquiries where I couldn't personally go. Mr. Smith — I will just say for the information of Mr. Wheeler, that there is now in Washington a scientific process. Mr. France is on his way there with foul brood, and the best scientists in the United States are trying to solve that jprobleln, and it is better than we inspectors can do, and we expect information from there that will be nublished in all the bee-papers. Mr. Moore — I feel very deeply in this matter, to state that any' man who goes abroad and tries to help the bee- keepers ought to go for two years to the Agricultural Col- lege at Champaign and take a regular scientific course in entomology and microscopy. That ought to be done. The question is. Who is going to pay for it? I was appointed by the chief inspector, Mr. Smith, as deputy inspector. In the pursuit of my duties I spent 33 days calling on bee- keepers within my reach. I followed a totally different scheme from my chief, Mr Smith. He gave me no instruc- tions as to what I should do. So I took the addresses that I had of the members of our Association, and there is some- thing like 300, and attempted to call on everybody. It was published in the American Bee Journal, and we tried to ad- vertise to every one that we would go and see whoever called for us within say 20 miles of Chicago. But we got no re- sponses. I think there was one or two who wrote to me, suggesting that they would like a visit. I called in, on my own plan and out of 135 apiaries I found about 25 diseased. Now, you see, if I had attempted simply to go where there were complaints I would have had two out of 25. I found 23 diseased apiaries by dint of calling on everybody and examining the hives in the apiary that seemed to show disease or weakness. Dr. Miller — How many of those 23 knew before you called that their bees had foul brood? Mr. Moore — Not to exceed two or three. I would have to guess at that. They knew that the bees had not done as well as they did some time before, and they had not gotten any honey from that hive or from other hives, but that they had this awful disease that we understand as foul brood, they didn't know. Mr. Dadant — Were they foul-broody in every case ? Mr. Moore — You understand it is a great deal easier to ask questions than answer them. I myself had about 35 154 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT colonies and lost practically the whole thing with foul brood. I had no experience with it, and it got into a dreadful state before I knew it was foul brood ; and I didn't go at it in the scientific way that Mr. McEvoy and Mr. France teach, and that we all practice nowadays, and the result was I lost the whole thing. I found foul brood in quite a number of dif- ferent stages in the honey. I saw foul brood, as I say, in those 25 apiaries, which would mean 75 to 100 colonies af- fected; and after a while one gets the idea in his head, and I am satisfied now that I know foul brood when I see it. It is not necessary to smell anything at all to find foul brood. The expression has been used that one who cannot tell foul brood in his hives when he smells it is not competent to treat the disease. I believe that is true, because you can see foul brood with your eyes a long time before you will smell it at all, a good sunlight helping you. That shows to me that the disease is much more widely distributed than any one has an idea. I believe the only way to do these things is to make a clean sweep of them. With infectious diseases we make laws to protect the public and we don't care a snap of the finger for the individual who is injured, as long as the welfare of the entire people is at stake. Some laws are made paying injured individuals for the loss of their goods, such as cattle and some other things, but as far as I know there is no law in the United States compensating any bee-keeper for the loss of his bees. Now, the reason has occurred to me why. Under our accepted treatments — we call it the iVicEvoy treatment — you can save your bees in a great many cases. If you go to the Legislature and say, "We can save our bees, but there is a big loss there, and we want to pay the bee-keepers for it," they won't understand it. If you save your hives and bees they can't see where there is much loss at all; and the duty of the inspector is to help you, and give you a money value, of course, in helping you to eradicate the disease and to save your bees and hives. Consequently, they would not give any compensating clause in any law to that effect. I made a minute of every case, and I can tell you the names, number of colonies they have, and the number of hives infected, and what I said. It would take a month if I would attempt to cover that ground. Pres. York — Did the foul-brood inspector visit all the bee-keepers in this (Cook) County? Mr. Moore — Not by any means. In Cook County we have from 350 to 400 bee-keepers, and my total visits were 125 or 135 calls. Mr. Wheeler — Did you do any work in helping to get rid of the disease? Mr. Moore — I did everything that was possible. Where there was an opening I made appointments and went back on other days and helped them cure the disease. I spent in some cases half a day with individuals to see the thing was done properly. I am green along side of these people who have made a life study of it ; I feel as if I were in the A B C class. I don't want any one to get the idea that I think I STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 155 am an authority on this subject, but I want to contribute my information for the general good. The people all over our State are not competent to treat it any more than they are competent to treat a case of diphtheria or typhoid fever. Mr. Wilcox — How much is a diseased colony damaged by treatment? Mr. Moore — Every day it is without any treatment? Mr. Kimmey — Yes, of course. Mr. Moore — I say it is not damaged one cent's worth. Mr. Wilcox — How much do you have to treat those which are not diseased? Mr. Moore — I don't like to answer these questions be- cause it means more experience than I have had, but I give my opinion. I go to a man's apiary and he has 20 or 30 colonies. How am I to tell which is diseased? We usually go from May to September. At that time of the year the colonies are prosperous if they ever are. We walk up and down the rows of bee-hives and we talk to the owner and say, "Now, which colony has not been prosperous?" He says. "This one." We open that hive. Something is the matter with that colony; it may be queenless, it may be entirely "•dead, or it may be nearly dead with foul brood; and with or without smoke we open it. Almost at a glance, when you get a frame out from the middle of the brood-nest you can tell what you have got. If he suggests this or that hive we always open that. If you are not satisfied with what he sug- gests, say, "All right, I will look around a little." You open one, two or three hives and you have a general view of the situation. When he has 10, 20 or 30 colonies we don't at- tempt for a moment to go through them all. Mr. Wilcox — You treat them all whether they are foul- broody or not? Mr. Moore — ^Under our law we have no power to treat at all ; we have simply to give advice. If they allow us to treat we are glad to do so. Mr. Wilcox — What I want to find out is whether there are any damages to be paid for it? Mr. Moore — Whether there ought to be a law giving dam- ages to the bee-keeper? There should not, in my judgment. BEES AS PROPERTY, AND ASSESSABLE. Mr. Swift — ^Our bees as property are not assessable under the laws of the State of Illinois. If they are not assessable and produce no revenue why should the State pay revenue back? Take cattle or any animal that is diseased, every one is assessed upon that animal and pays revenue into the State. Dr. Miller — ^They may not be assessable but they are assessed; I pay taxes on my bees. Mr. Swift — ^You don't have to. They are not assessable. Mr. Moore — You are a little in error, Mr. Swift, in the schedule is a clause which says, "Other property." Now to a really conscientious man, if he calls bees property, he ought to list them; and I know of two or three who list them and if-i--Y-yO^^^^^^^ ■" .^-_..,^_... ^^^ ^ 156 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT are assessed. Now if we are assessed, that will give us cer- tain rights before the Legislature. Mr. Swift — The only thing is this, bees come under that class of ferce naturce — they are wild by nature; and conse- quently anything of that character is like a fiock of prairie chickens — the farmer does not have to pay taxes on them. Bees are not assessable under the revenue laws of the State of Illinois unless a man chooses to list them as "other prop- erty." Consequentiv this is my opinion. The Supreme Court may .differ from me — I am not certain it has ever been ad- judicated upon by the Supreme Court — but I think they are not assessable from the very fact that without any provoca- tion a colony of bees does sometimes take wing and go away in the spring. It is the very fluctuating character of the thing. A man in the fall might have 100 colonies, and in the spring he might not have more than 15, and according to Dr. Miller, then, he has to go before the Board of Supervisors and the Committee on Payments and present his claim for the loss of his-property, unless he chooses to pay on something he has not got. Under those circumstances, the bees not being assessable, by the very nature of the property, as property that is fixed and tangible is, that can be gotten hold of or levied upon — because I don't believe there is a sheriff in the State would levy on a hive of bees — by that very fact you could not go before the Legislature and ask any law that would give force that a bee-keeper should be recompensed if his bees were injured by being treated for foul brood or any disease. But if you can get the Legislature to recognize that this is a source of revenue for the State, and of wealth to the individual, and his wealth in that way can be assessed and taxed as his money and household goods and the things he can buy as the result of his product, then they will legislate and will do what they have done in the past — give you any appropriation for the protection of that industry. But when you come to ask for recornpense for injury done by making the injured better, you have gone up against the wrong thing, and will meet a snag every time. Mr. Dadant — I would be very glad to hear bees are not assessable. I have been paying taxes on bees for many years. The argument is very good but it is not only bees ; there is the hive, the combs, the brood, the honey, the supers and sections of foundation and all that belongs to the hive. I pay taxes on my bees; I pay taxes on the comb foundation I manufacture. All this belongs to the bees. If the bees are not asessable, and all this other part of the property is not taxable, I have $15,000 worth of goods on hand. I have been paying taxes, and I would be ashamed not to pay taxes. Mr. Swift — Mr. Dadant does not bear in mind that he is in a manufacturing industry. Mr. Dadant — We would suffer from foul brood if our bees had it. Mr. Swift — You say your wax does not get affected by foul brood. As a manufacturer with an industry with a capital stock, then, you would be assessed upon it whether in- STATE BEE-KEEPERS^ ASSOCIATION. 157 corporated or as an individual; but here is a man that has got 50 colonies of bees on his farm — I don't believe he can be assessed on them. If a test case was made, from the very fact of its fluctuating character, I do not believe he could be assessed. The honey might be assessed, and possibly the hive, if you could fix what the value would be, but not that which deteriorates and is so fluctuating it would be almost impossible to determine. But the product of the bees in his possession is property that is assessable. Just the same as in your commission business if you have a thousand cases of honey in your warehouse on the first day of April you are assessed upon that, upon its market value, upon a fifth of its fair cash valuation. But upon bees out in the field there is no assessment. I don't believe it ever can lie. Mr. Colburn — I had hoped to continue this discussion on foul brood because I am particularly interested in it. I am no lawyer, but listening to the gentleman here I want to say this, he makes a particular point of fercB naturce. I want to ask if the wild ox and the wild goat and all animals were not at one time ferce naturcef Mr. France has a great many papers here pertaining to the legal status of bees. Quite a number of decisions have been made lately in regard to that very point. Bees sometimes leave my premises and go on the premises of my neighbor. The question is whether I could go after them or not. Mr. France might be able to tell us about the legal status. As to bees being assessable in con- sequence of their fluctuating nature, you might answer the question by saying a man might have 50 cows on his place and they may all die. Therefore I don't consider that is a good argument in that view of the case, for the assessor doesn't care a cent what is to become of that property; if he finds it in my possession he will assess it. The big factories up in the stock yards have a million, or two million dollars' worth of pork piled up there. When the assessor goes around it is all in New York, but if it is there he will assess it. The same way with bees. I think they are assessable if they are there at the time the assessor comes around. Mr. Kimmey — I :want you to indulge me just a minute. All of these men who have talked want this discussion stopped. I am responsible because I asked the question. I used to be a lawyer myself. I didn't know much law and have forgotten a good deal I once knew. But I commenced in 1868 in the business and have been connected with it ever since, and after listening to Mr. Swift on the question whether bees are assessable or not, I believe he is mistaken. Pres. York — They used to be when you studied law ! Mr. Kimmey — You men that have been convicted at law don't say anything. You remember the Irishman who said, "I don't want to go to trial." The judge says, "You needn't be afraid, you will get justice, and be jailed." He replied, "That's just what I don't want." [Laughter.] It is true my bees go out on my neighbor's lawn and gather their honey, but it is also true that bees have been recognized by the laws of this country as property, but prairie chickens have not. 158 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT You can steal bees but you can't go over to the other man's farm and steal prairie chickens. Of course you can commit trespass. But when you steal a colony of bees don't you be- lieve they are fercz naturae and that you can get out of it. You will go to the penitentiary, probably. He can sell the prairie chickens after he shoots them. Mr. Smith — He can't sell them after he shoots them. Mr. Kimmey — There is another fellow that has been caught. [Laughter.] If you obey the law you can shoot them. There is a certain time of the year. Do we want to say we are going to own property that is valuable to us, out of which we make our living, and that it is not assessable? If there is any such idea as that let us be honest and fair and drop it. If they are not assessable I think they should be made so. I rather insist upon Mr. Moore making a state- ment because he came to my house and we had a peculiar experience down there. Mr. Moore came to me from visiting an educated gentleman, a man that knows all about the anatomy of the bee and foul brood, and that sort of thing, and Mr. Moore told me that this gentleman had one case of foul brood. I had never seen any and I wanted to see, and feel, and smell it. I went up there and I told the gentle- man that I wanted to see the colony of bees that Mr. Moore said had foul brood. He says, "You can't see any foul brood here." He also said he had once been cleaned out entirely by foul brood. I was ready to believe there was something there. I know he bought some bees of another neighbor who had foul brood. I had some of the same bees ; in fact, the only ones I had to commence with came from there. I was interested in it. He " said he had a small nucleus that was doing fairly well and in the meantime had a hive full of comb, no bees, and he wanted those bees to take care of that comb, and so set the hive with the comb on top of the nucleus. Con- sequently the queen and some of the bees moved out, and then came the cold weather last spring and the brood in the lower hive died. I was ready to believe that story. He also said that Mr. Moore said he was not an expert. I suppose Mr. Moore said the same things to him that he said this morning. I took it for granted there was no foul brood, and didn't in- sist upon an examination. It seemed to me, then, and it seems to me now — I want to be frank and fair about it — Mr. Moore either ought to know what foul brood is, without go- ing two years to the agricultural college, or else Mr. Moore ought to stop inspecting. I believe after hearing him talk here this morning that the bees of the gentleman I referred to had foul brood, and that Mr. Moore knew it. I think he wants to shake off some of his modesty and say he knows foul brood when he sees it. I want to mention another thing this gentleman told me. He said, "Notwithstanding I believe there is no foul brood I am going to burn that thing up, hive and everything," which he did that night; and I believe that is the proper spirit that any one should show even though one may have a doubt in regard to it. A hive of bees of course is not of much consequence, but if he finds it in one, STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 159 and there is more than one hive, he should be willing to in- vestigate. Mr. Moore came to my place and looked my colonies over and did it in a very thorough manner, for which I am obliged to him. I said, "How much do I owe you?" He replied, "You owe me just one dollar, and I want you to pay it to join the Chicago-Northwestern Bee-Keepers' Asso- ciation. I want to state the facts, and I am impelled more to say it by the remarks the gentleman made in the rear of the room. I believe Mr. Moore has done his duty, and he is a good man, and I don't want him to go around saying, "I don't know," when he does. Mr. Moore — I am not correctly quoted in the case which Mr. Kimmey has mentioned. The gentleman Mr. Kimmey referred to merely plays with bees for pleasure. He told me he had practically been cleaned out with foul brood, but that he hadn't any at that time; and I certainly told him, as I have told everybody, that I knew foul brood when I saw it, absolutely, and I do know it. When it comes to these scien- tific matters, in which every subject is involved if you come right down to the very bottom of it, I say I am not an expert,, as Mr. France or Mr. McEvoy is, because I have not got their years of experience. But I absolutely know foul brood, and I told that gentleman so, and he said, "I haven't got it." We examined one or two of his hives and the bees were very cross ; I got stung repeatedly. We had smoke, too, lots of it. When we got done with that hive I showed him he had foul brood, and I showed him the proofs of it, and he admitted that it was foul brood. There was also pickled brood in the same frame with it in the same colony ; and he didn't deny to me at all he had foul brood in his apiary. Mr. Kimmey — ^When Mr. Moore was in our section he Avent to every bee-keeper he could find, and spared neither tinie nor pains in going to the bottom of all of them. I gave him the name of every bee-keeper I' knew within five or six rniles, and I understand from hearing from them that he visited all of them. Dr. Miller — I have a resolution to offer : "Resolved, That it is the sense of this Convention that it is desirable that bees should be assessed and taxed." Mr. Smith — I might say that that same resolution was passed at the State Bee-Keepers' Convention two weeks ago, in Springfield. Mr. Moore — I want to correct some of these lawyers tliat are talking about common law and State law. Wlienever the Illinois Legislature raises its hands it wipes the common law off the land. I S *! Hi Pres. York put the motion, and a vote having been taken it was declared carried. BLACK BROOD — PICKLED BROOD. Mr. Colburn — We hear about black brood, and this sum- mer I ran across two or three symptoms in my apiary of something not exactly like foul brood. Some four years ago 160 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT up on the North Side I had an apiary and I had something I didn't understand, 'so I sent a portion of the brood to Dr. Howard, and he returned it stating it was not foul brood, but pickled brood. This year I have something just like both, and not like either. I think possibly we may be getting a little taste of black brood; and possibly the reason we differ is that we are looking at things from different points, or rather have a different disease ; that may account for the discrepancy of symptoms, etc., which we find in different hives. Dr. Miller — I rise to a question of privilege. I have a whole lot of speeches on foul brood, and I know you would be delighted to hear them, but I think the time is passing, and I believe we ought to hear from Mr. France. Mr. France — I don't know just what part of this discus- sion you want. Do you want the description so that you may know without guessing when you look into a hive or not? Dr. Miller — Give that first as briefly as you can. DETECTING FOUL BROOD. Mr. France — There is one thing of vital importance to Illinois, that the State Association and the Chicago-North- western, now made a part of it, hand in hand together work for the needed legislation this winter, and not wrangle so much over other things. I am on my way to Washington to help Prof. Benton get out a bulletin, of which there will be published 50,000 conies for free distribution to the bee-keepers of the United States, on the diseases of bees. I find that edu- cational literature on this subject will do as much good as inspe<^ting. As Jsoon as we can get the people educated I nuestion if we will need any inspectors. [Applause.] As I said yesterday, unfortunately in our State I find a very small proportion of the bee-keepers who read bee-literature, and it is going to take some time to get them educated. Until that time we will have need of those other devices. To those of us here who have not seen foul brood, this sample I am tak- ing with me to Washington — (by the way, it has odor enough) — is a sample procured out of a hive in the city of St. Louis while I was down~there at our National Convention. That disease was contracted from your State, across the river, by bees robbing from the city of St. Louis, so that your State transmitted it over there. It is a very serious case of disease. Mr. Wheeler — How can you prove that? Mr. France — We prove it in this way : The strongest colonies of bees that this man had in St. Louis were, in the fore part of the season, very busy bringing in honey and ap- parently robbing from somewhere. He took chop dust and put upon those bees so that he might see how long it would take for them to go and come back again. He got the time, and he discovered them all going directly east across the river. He went across the river and found a bee-yard infected with foul brood, and these bees with the dust on, going in and out. Mr. Wheeler — Did he have other colonies? Mr. France — Yes, there are three others that have stolen STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 161 away from this naughty colony which was the strongest, and to-day is a dead colony in the hive. Now the disease in ap' pearance varies according to the localities, but I find some few things that do not vary a great deal: The sunken cap- ping; the ragged, perforated holes in the capping. I believe in all the States that is common. The bee in the larval age, at aboui. six to eight days from the egg, will first to the naked eye show the appearance of the disease; earlier than that you would need a glass. I am taking this from the point of those who want to use just the naked eye, as you can't, without a glass, see it before that. The bee will, in the larval age, in- stead of crawling around as it should, stand upon the point ends of that larva with its back up. It is diseased, in agony, and in that condition it does not lay down naturally. There is a little yellow cast on either side of the back. It finally straightens out the same as the natural larva, and in stand- ing up it lacks the vitality to retain itself in that shape and falls back again to the lower side-wall of the cell. That is the time that the larva will make itself adhere to the side- wall and will never let go. Now, there is a marked difference between black brood, pickled brood, and foul brood. Foul brood, when it once strikes the lower side-wall, stays there as if fastened with glue. The bees can not remove it except in one way. If those combs have been thoroughly fumigated with formalde- hyde it has a chemical action on those and they do remove it in some cases, but not in all. That bee in the last dying effort gets quite a dark color, and it throws out its tongue frequently with force sufficient so that the tongue strikes the upper side-wall and as such will hold as if put there by glue. That will have a tendency, as the body of the bee dries out, to draw the head up. This tongue has a tendency still to hold, a(nd in the sample I have here there are many of those larvae at that age with the tongue still holding thread-like to the upper side-wall. That is the only reason I can give why always in foul brood the head of the larval bee has a Chinese- shoe-fashion or turn-up; it is because of that. ' Now, the body of the bee becomes flattened and dark- brown, nearly coffee-color, and just at that point in giving way, as it drops down, there is a dark, very nearly a black streak across the body of the bee, and apparently on either side little brown streaks that will remain in that condition for about two days. It will continue to dry on the point on the lower side-wall until it is no thicker than the side-wall of the comb, s6metimes even thinner than that, but the head end of the bee having dried in that curled-up shape shows itself to the eye much quicker than the balance of it further back. jHow to look at the comb is one of the most important features that the bee-keepers of our country have not learned. They take a comb and hold it looking straight down into the cells. I confess I can't see foul brood in that way. For the benefit of this bulletin we are getting out, I went to an artist the other day with this comb and told him I wanted to be 162 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT photographed, but to take the picture from the rear. I wanted to show how to look down in the comb. As an illus- tration we will suppose this to be a comb of foul brood, and I want to look into it and there is the light — and by the way, never take candle light or electric light — you want good day light in order to see it satisfactorily. If I were to hold it upright, and stand with the light coming over my shoulder, I would still look down into the bottom of the cell and see no foul brood. But let me tip the top towards me so that Proper Position to Hold Foul-Broody Comb. my eye looking in there will strike the lower side-wall about one-third the length towards the base, then I will see those black-brown heads readily all through the comb. You need never question it. Black brood or pickled brood will never have the appearance that foul brood does. In every state where I have found it, there is a marked difference. This photo is simply showing where I am holding up the comb. I made a streak on the negative showing the angle of the rays of light. It should be coming over the shoulder, and then tip the top of the comb towards you. STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 163 Mr. Wheeler — Have you learned anything definitely this last year about fumigating? Mr. France — I took one apiary badly infected where there were several hundred combs, and from the fact that formal- dehyde gas is one of the best disinfectants the medical world has to-day, 'there wa^ a great possibility, and I had a box made by one of the best carpenters, which was perfectly air- tight, all jointed, and white lead put in the joints. I put in that box quite a number of combs, leaving about an inch and a ihalf space between each two combs. I had Mr. Weber's lamp and followed his directions with one exception — I gave twice the amount, and doubled the time in which it was fumi- gated. I aired the combs, and two days later I put them back into clean hives, put the bees back on those combs, and went to Los Angeles to the National Convention; came home, went immediately up there, and by the time I got back they had the brood hatched. In about three-quarters of those hives I found foul brood beginning to appear. I went to further in- vestigation on !the case and I found this, that every frame I had fumigated had here and there a cell that was capped over at the time. Those that were not capped over the bees had cleaned out,, and I could not see any foul brood, but where they haki not taken that capping off, seemingly the chemical properties of the acid had not destroyed the germs, and the brood in those cells was diseased. So that if I were to fumi- gate combs I should first uncap everything sealed and put it in an extractor, and I would throw that brood till I was satis- fied ,1 had thrown everything out of it possible, and then fumigate it. There is a possibility, but bear in mind we are running a great risk and I would not recommend it. I have carefully weighed the combs, carefully weighed the wax ren- dered from a set of combs, and considered the price of foun- dation, and in Wisconsin we can change a hive infected with did and black combs to comb foundation at the cost of 12 cents per colony. Why do we put any stress upon the loss in that line? Those bees have as much new vigor and ambi- tion to work on foundation, over the other one, as a boy has over a new suit of clothes. Mr. Wheeler — We have heard a good deal about fumiga- ting the hive with a spray; there is a man in California that has practised that. He sprays the bottom-board and allows the fumes to go up in the combs. Mr. France — I have tried that somewhat, but there is a marked difference between California's dry atmosphere and here. I question, with the experience I have had within the last two years, if the hive is thoroughly clean that there is any danger. I put the bees right back into the same hive on comb foundation, land I have no trouble. Mr. Wheeler — Do you shake them out twice? Mr. France — Yes. I tried two apiaries by shaking once, and -in the (majority -^of cases it cured it, but here and there would be a case in an apiary where it did not, and it would not be safe. W'e do not lose a great deal if we do this at the beginning of the honey-flow. As an illustration, up in L:.iTi^-' ^T 164 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Central Wisconsin'' I reached an apiary of 15 or 20 colonies, all infected, quite late in the afternoon or evening of the first day of basswood bloom. The man was a very thorough man ; his surroundings all showed it. I repeated to him what I would do with the apiary, were it mine. I said, "Do you un- derstand it?" He said, "Yes." Now as a teacher I learned that the best way to know that the student understood v/hat I itold hitn/ was to let him tell it back to me again. I said, "You tell me, if you please, what you are going to do with those bees." He did, and I had to correct him only in two places, so Ivwas satisfied he understood how to do it, and do it thoroughly. Thirty days later I returned to the apiary to see wh'at the effect was. The same hives were there and I could find no indications of the disease. That was two years ago, and there is none there yet. So I am satisfied it is treated and cured. And on those hives was from 16 to 18, and on one hive 24 pounds of section comb honey within 30 days after they had been treated. That colony had not suf- fered very much. From another apiary that had gone down from a large to a small number, the apiary having been treated, those bees had been taking first and second premiums at our Wis- consin State fair. It doesn't hurt a boy to have a new suit of clothes. The cost is a very minor affair. The worst diffi- culty with me, for the first few years at least, was to adjust myself to the peculiar condition of each individual bee-keeper. There is the worst feature I find as an inspector. One man is glad you have come, and will do anything, even leave the harvest, if you please, to have that work attended to ; the other man is the very opposite — he would sooner you would get away from there; he would promise an3rthing to get rid of you; and the surroundings correspond. That is the man who needs an inspector, not the other man. In order to help out I have taken with me for the last two years a German wax-press, having a case made so that I could check it as baggage. Where I found a badly -infected yard, with the class of bee-keeper whose surroundings are not favorable, I take off my coat and I stay there and clean up the premises myself, and take my wax-press and go on. If 1 leave it to him a neighbor who is making his living out of the business will suffer from the indifference of this friend. Mr. Wilcox — Have you traced the source of foul brood to bee-trees or wild bees in the woods? Mr. France — That was brought out very strongly the second year I was out. One man said, "There is no use treating my bees because the woods are full of bee-trees, and you will never get rid of it." I used to hunt bee-trees. So after I had treated all the bees in the vicinity, and be- fore I got through, I found two bee-trees. One of them was where a swarm had gone from an infected hive ; it was away over yonder on a bluff. This man said that that tree must be diseased. I said, "On what basis can you argue that that is diseased?" He said, "Why, the bees went from here over there; they carried the honey with them, and I STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 165 am dead sure it is diseased." I said, "Wait a moment. What did we do to this hive ?" "We took away the combs ; we gave them foundations." "Have they got any over there ?" He said, "No." I said, "After they had drawn out the foundation we took that away and made them go again and they had nothing; they had to consume all the honey they took with them to produce the first combs, to start to store the honey they gathered from the field, and I will venture the assertion they are not diseased." We went over and cut the tree down, felling it very care- fully,, and there was no disease. We cut some other trees and I found trees where the bees had died from lack of protection; and I also found this, that within a year's time after a colony of bees had died the squirrels and the bee- moth will eradicate everything in the interior of that tree ; there is no danger left. If the bee-keepers will attend to their end of the work they need not worry over the bee- tree problem. There is just one way a bee-tree might be infected. If a colony has combs drawn and has wintered over, or towards the latter portion of the season they have some- body who is careless, thereby having foul brood, that bee- tree bees could go and rob from an infected bee-hive and transmit it to that tree ; but we all know it is a matter of short duration; that colony of bees would not last long; squirrels and moths would soon eradicate what is in the tree. If we do our part v/e will get rid of foul brood. Pres. York — What kind of a foul brood law do we need in this State? Mr. France — Coming out of another State I hardly like to recommend, but my opinion is this : Keep the appropria- tion you have; put in effect your inspector with authority, and you will accomplish a great deal of good. Pres. York — You mean as to a compulsory clause? Mr. France — Yes. Now this comb I have here is ap illustration. As I understand this apiary is in your State ; your inspector wants to investigate that apiary and has been objected to. Look at the situation. We will take as an illustration a row of these seats, each one representing dif- ferent apiaries. The inspector comes to this party and wants to look at the hives. "Yes, I am glad to have you come in." The next says, "My bees are all right." The inspector says, "I don't like to look at these, but while I am here I will look at them." The answer he receives is, "You get off the premises." He has got to go. You see the weak point in the law. What would we do with contagious diseases amongst ourselves if our law did not admit of our health warden coming in and saying "this is small-pox," or any other con- tagious disease, "and they must be quarantined." You say, "No, we have no smajl-pox; let everybody come in and out." It is just as necessary for your inspector to be clothed with that authority if you would get the desired effect. Mr. Kimmey — You have considered the possibility and propriety of having a National foul brood law ? Mr. France — Yes, but we have first got to demonstrate ii?iil8£»;>^S?.^iS^4ikii^^lii«;!:S£ff^^ ■'. ■ '-ji!Sd^l\K-iJ:c!i£^ ati^ V :^'. _^iri.iS»r-.-j- 170 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT grit, and energy, she will make a success of it. If she is afraid of bees and doesn't care for them, and is not interested in them, I don't know that she would be very apt to make a success of it. As to the profit of bee-keeping, I think there are other profits to be considered than dollars and cents. The health of many women would be improved, and they would enjoy a f^reat deal of profit outside of dollars and cents. As for me, I am very sure that the profit in Miss Emma M. Wii,son. regard to my health would have been a sufficient inducement for me to have gone into bee-keeping; and I think many women would find the same thing, besides materially adding to their finances at the same time. Pres. York — I think Mrs. Stow said something about having a man to help her. What do you say about that, Miss Wilson? Miss Wilson — I think it would be very advisable — if you can get one. [Laughter.] I think you can get along with- out them. STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 171 Pres. York — Next, I was going to ask Miss Wilson to tell about the man that helps her. Miss Wilson — If you could all have as good a man to help you as I have to help me, I would advise you all to have a man. Mr. Wilcox — Can you tell us any reason why a woman producing comb honey cannot make it as profitable as a man can? Miss Wilson — I don't know of any reason; I say it all depends upon the woman. Miss Candler — I don't know, only as Miss Wilson says ; bee-keeping is very nice, very profitable, and very health- ful. PRESSURE OF THE GERMAN WAX-PRESS. "Will Mr. Root tell us what is the pressure of the Ger- man wax-press?" Mr. Root — I don't believe that I can answer that in pounds. Miss Wilson said a good deal depends upon the woman in keeping bees. A good lead depends on the wax you are pressing, and a good deal depends on what strength you have. One great trouble is, it is a mistake to suppose that a great deal of pressure is necessary; an intermittent pressure is generally better than to squeeze the combs right down. Suppose you fill your press clean up to the top, and then squeeze it down in a solid mass, and consider you have done the job. That is not the way it should be done. It should be squeezed, and turned over, and turned over, and squeezed, if you want to get it all out. Some experiments are going to show that hot water is a great deal better than steam. Mr. France — Just one thing there. I believe that some of you get a wrong impression about the wax-press. When Mr. Root said, "You fill that up," he won't recommend that, or I have not found that from my experience. You want to put in but a small quantity of slumgum at a time in order to get the effect of the pressure. Mr. Wilcox — How thick should the cake be at the bot- tom of the press when you press it? Mr. France — I should prefer not to have it over an inch and a half thick. Mr. Reynolds— Dr. Miller, I believe, asked Mr. Hubert Root last year what the pressure was of that press, and he stated that there was between three and four tons. I claim that there is no such pressure, for the simple reason that the cross-piece of the wax-press will not stand it. The one I use bends, and draws the side in on the basket, and it is a hard matter to. get the basket out with the slumgum in. Dr. Miller — Is the bar of wood or metal? Mr. Reynolds — It is wood. I think it is not right that that should be sent broadcast through the proceedings of the convention as it was last year. Mr. Meredith — I believe if you take a 10-pound block, and put it over the screw, turning or pressing the wax, that the pressure at which I have used tlie press, the slumgum 172 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT would easily raise a 10-pound block. I don't tbink there are many people who recognize the force that is obtained by the screw process. Possibly Mr. Root could give us some idea. You have seen buildings that have been raised with jacks, and the thread on the wax-press is something like that, which would indicate a large amount of pressure. Mr. Wheeler — I have used one of those presses and I have had to do away with one of those top sticks. As Mr. Reynolds said, it was too light, and kept bending, and bend- ing, until it was a regular rainbow, and finally we had to put in twice as heavy a stick of oak, 3 by 4 inches, and that works tip-top. The hot steam seems to soften the wood. Ernest R. Root. The first one gave out entirely. After it got a bent shape I turned it over. Mr. Root — What Mr. Wheeler says is true. We found that out to our sorrow, and I will say we have replaced those, and any one who has had one that has given them trouble, we desire to give him a new one. We put an iron brace under it, and a piece of sheet-metal to protect the wood. I perhaps ought not to say it, but I will say it, that wax- press is something we sent out and we thought it was per- fect. There is a great deal to learn about a wax-press. My brother has been three months working on this wax-press, ten hours a day, doing nothing else, and sometimes clear up into the evening, and we have learned this, that great pressure is not necessary. During the last year we changed STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 173 the pitch of the screw so that it would have less than half the power of the first screw sent out, because the difficulty would be, they would put too great pressure on and break it. Mr. France is right when he says a press should not be full, only enough to make a cheese about an inch and a half thick. Then you can get all out but about five percent of the wax. What we are working for now is to get that five percent. Mr. Dadant — We have had considerable experience in melting beeswax and old combs. We used to melt old combs by breaking them up fine, soaking them in water, and then rendering them. But the great principle is, if you get the combs well broken, those combs that contain cocoons or the skins of the larva lodge in the cells, and no matter what amount of pressure they will not come out ; that is, they will not allow the wax to come out. If you have every- thing well broken, and well soaked in water, the beeswax will come out sooner or later. Dr. Miller — That is very good, I believe, but I failed on that. Mr. Dadant — I never did much of it myself, but I know we did it. Dr. Miller — I am merely saying I didn't know enough to do it, and I would like to know how. Mr. Dadant — If you do it in warm weather it will not do it so well, but in cold weather it will do it better. We have used the German wax-press, and I believe we are one of the few who have not broken the iron casting given in the first place. We had customers who bought those through us and who all complained of breaking them. We took it for granted that it was easily broken, and we must be care- ful, and I think we got the wax out of the combs about as well as anybody could. We put the wax in and put on the pressure, and keep it on all day long. You will find every few minutes, or half an hour or so, you can make another turn with but a little pressure, and keep on getting your wax away from the center. We have the same thing in pressing grapes. You take a large cheese of grape-pulps and press it in a hurry, and the juice in the center has no time to get out; but give it time to press out, as the pressure goes on it it gives more room; you press it gradually, and therefore you can get better results with less fatigue to the operator. Dr. Miller — Do I understand that the metal casting had broken? Mr. Root — The first press we sent out had a cast-iron frame built exactly as they build them in Germany. I sup- posed if we followed the plan given in Germany we would be perfectly safe. Those who have had experience in mak- ing castings will know that sometimes there are flaws in the casting. Mr. Dadant may have had one without any flaws. Those flaws are covered up by galvanizing. We re- placed all that we knew about, and sent out the wooden tops. I sent Dr. Miller one. Then we discovered that the com- bination of metal and wood — wood protected by a piece of ^k^-s'-'*da?:^a-j:S^5^^^S^i^^fcL«»gs»jaa?:^g^ita:^:g£ji^A?^ '"^^^^^■^'':'^^^!^^i^i?^^^W-i'?infir"'---''"^'Sr^^^^ 174 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT galvanized iron — was better than anything else we could have, and that is what we are now furnishing. It consists of a piece of hard oak, 4 by 3 inches thick; on the inner side of it is a cast-iron brace that is two inches at the widest part, through which the screw passes, and an inch at the farthest point. This brace is made just like ordinary braces — with a rib running through the center to stiffen it. The cast-iron top was a circular piece of cast-iron about three- eights of an inch thick, with ribs like the spokes of a wheel, the ribs being thicker towards the center. Mr. Meredith — I would like to say a word, not speaking of pressure as a defect, but from experience possibly in put- ting on too much power when I have had to let it stand. The bottom or the portion upon which the cage sets being a light piece of metal with rivets around, I have drawn two or three rivets right straight through, and I found that the iron around there has turned something like the fans of a windmill, instead of standing up. I was wondering if that was a common complaint, or just an accident with my machine. Mr. Root — That is not a common complaint, but in some few instances it has happened. There is one thing about the wax-press I feel chagrined over — that we couldn't build it in the first place so that it would resist these strains. But you can see what the problem was to us, it was making one strain against another, and that strain sufficient to stand all kinds of pressure. When we say the pressure must be right, it may be three or four tons, or four or five tons, they don't quite understand what we mean. In reference to the remark made by Mr. Reynolds, stating that my brother said the pressure would be three or four tons, he probably gave that statement from first experiments then made. /Kt that time we thought great pressure was necessary, but we learned afterwards pressure was not needed, but a light pressure con- tinued, so that the wax could get away. Mr. Reynolds — Don't you think it should be sent broad- cast to the people that that was a mistake? Mr. Root — This is broadcast here. Mr. Reynolds — ^^Shouldn't it be put in Gleanings? Mr. Root — I think I have published it two or three times. EXHIBITS AND PRIZES AT CONVENTIONS. Mr. Swift — I don't want to shut off the wax-press dis- cussion, but a matter has occurred to me that is entirely foreign. I have attended, now, I think, three or four of these conventions — I am not sure which — and this is the only convention I have ever attended where there is nothing in evidence of the object of the convention. You take the Fat Stock Show, and when they have their meeting they have their stock to see and judge; you take the meeting of the Horticultural Society, and the different associations throughout the United States and elsewhere, and they all have exhibitions of their products — something to judge by. The Chicago-Northwestern Bee-Keepers' Association have STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 175 nothing but a bare room, and these charming ( !) pictures to gaze upon, while you are listening to the words of knowledge that come. I think it would be a good idea to have something on the line of our work on exhibition here at the convention. Our Secretary-Treasurer has notified us we are woefully weak in the form of finances. If we join any more associations we probably won't have any- thing left. If it meets with the approval of the Executive Committee, I would like to make an offer of $10 to the Association for three prizes for the exhibition of honey at our next convention; $5 for the first, $3 for the second, and $2 for the third — say a dozen sections of comb honey, the quality and character considered, and I will myself be responsible for the premium, if that meets with the approval of the Association. Pres. York — I think that is a very good idea, and if you wish to put it that way I think the Executive Committee will arrange for an exhibition next year; and if anybody else wishes to say they will give something, or give a premium for something else, we can have that. Dr. Miller — I will take it out of the hands of the Executive Committee, and move that the offer be accepted with thanks. Mr. Reynolds — I second that. Pres. York put the motion, which was carried with ap- plause. Dr. Miller — I want to suggest one caution. I have been at conventions where we have had a great many things on exhibition, and Mr. Swift doesn't know the danger-point that lies in connection with that. One of the troubles about it was that in an adjoining room, or sometimes in the same room where these articles were on exhibition, the invariable result would be that there would be two or three, or half a dozen, people around those things looking at them and talking about them while the meeting was going on, and unless some steps are taken to prevent that, you are going to do more harm than good. Mr. Swift — That is the reason I left it to the Executive Committee. Pres. York — If we meet here next year we can have it in front of the convention. Mr. Moore moved, seconded by Dr. Miller, that at 4 o'clock p. m. this convention adjourn to meet again next year. Carried. SECOND DAY— Afternoon SeSbion. At 1 :30 the convention was called to order, with Pres. York in the chair. PROTECTING HIVES FROM SUN HEAT. "Should hives be protected from the heat of the sun? If so, what is the best method?" Mr. Hutchinson — I think where you are producing comb »'^f^'?'?^praw^7*^'i'«r»!^??5f?^*- ^^f>'-.7^ r.^ ■• '■■;:>. '4^ 'f :^T^^:3^ri;aT''7^-*^'^^^*-^■-^?^^^V',';Tlr^:J*_£^ • F?r-1T-^^^Sr7' 176 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT honey, and the heat drives the bees out of the supers, it is an advantage to have the hives shaded. I don't know of anything better than a moveable board. You can make a very cheap "board" out of shingles by having a piece across the center of each, and you may nail the butts of the shingles together and make a shade-board 2 by 3 feet. Have the hive face either east or west, and lay that board on top of the hive. Mr. Kimniey — When it gets hot enough to drive the bees out of the super, you say. Do you know that it ever does. Mr. Hutchinson — Yes. W. Z. Hutchinson. Mr. Kimmey — Some one has told us if the hives are open; Mr. Doolittle has said there was no need of opening them at all. Mr. Hutchinson — It depends upon the location. If the hives are standing in a close place, where the sun could beat down and no breeze pass over, that would make a great difference. If they stood out on a hill where the breeze could blow over, that would make a great difference. Mr. Meredith — A gentleman I have some dealing with in the bee-business recommended planting grape-vines ; that lets the heat of the sun directly on the hives before the leaves come out, and after the leaves have fallen in the STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. ' 177 fall, and it gave them shade protection in the summer, using the Clinton grape more on account of its prolificness. Mr. Snell — I think the matter of shade depends largely upon location, as Mr. Hutchinson said; where the apiary is surrounded by a good deal of wind-break the air is more suffocating, and the hives in that case will need shading; where, if they stood out in more of an open place, where there is more circulation of air, they would not become heated up enough so that the bees would chister out very much and desert the supers. WIRING BROOD-FRAMES WITH STARTERS. "Should brood- frames with starters be wired to prevent breaking out of the comb?" Mr. Hutchinson — Unless the hives are to be moved or shipped by express I don't think there is any necessity for it, simply for use in your own apiary. If they are to be shipped they need wiring. Possibly if you are going to pro- duce extracted honey those wires would be of advantage, especially when the combs are new. After they are old they are not. Pres. York — Would the bees be apt to build the combs properly over the wires when using only starters? Mr. Hutchinson — Yes, they will. Mr. Kimmey — My experience with bees has been limited to the first swarm I had issue. I hived upon simple frames with starters, and I never expressed nor move them any- where except to carry them in the cellar, and three of those frames broke down; I don't know whether it was from my awkwardness, or weak combs, or what it was. It seems to me that after that experience I would always wire the frames. Mr. Meredith — In wiring frames of foundation I have experienced the trouble of the bees gnawing in or around the wire, and to do away with this trouble I use the brush and slightly cover the wires with a little heated wax. Mr. Becker — In my experience I have never used any wire. I always use half sheets of foundation for every brood- frame, and I have never had any trouble with frames break- ing down. Mr. Hoffman — I won't agree. If they do as I do they will have no trouble. Hive on full sheets of foundation, and put it in the hive, and then you want to wire. But I try, as a rule, to get all the combs drawn before that time. I put them in the top hives and have the bees draw them out, and then I can put them anywhere and they are all right. This wiring is a tedious undertaking for me. Mr. Horstmann — ^The comb will not break if properly handled, so there will be no necessity for wiring for the purpose of holding the combs. Take a frame and turn it over, and they are going to work up into it, right up and down; they will never break. Mr. Colburn — I think it depends upon whether tlie combs are fastened to all sides of the frames. I have had lflfftf^-1i ^ffliTftr^ T.-'^i ii.*^! ^Mi iifr''' ■iiriA'' II i"^! t- -- ^ ',^n.v;L:kVi^4^^;r^" 178 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT quite a number of combs where the frames were fastened securely, and I have done almost anything I wanted with them, and yet they never fell out ; and then I have had a White Sweet Clover, comb that was not fastened, and it simply tipped out by raising the frame horizontally. Mr. Hoffman — Wiring foundation gives one so much more work, and that is why I am not so much in favor of STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 179 it; by wiring you will get a straight comb, and true, and it will not sag, either. Mr. Horstmann — The question asked is. Is it necessary to wire frames with starters? I say it is not necessary, but if you want to take the frames out of the brood-chamber to extract the honey it will be necessary to have it wired. But answering, the question as it is, I consider it is not necessary, because I have handled the frames a great deal and I have never had one break yet, not even bend. Mr. Hoffman — I don't understand by the question that it means starters. I wouldn't wire them at all. SWEET CXOVER HONEY. "What are the objections, if any, to honey produced from sweet clover?" Mr. Horstmann — There is no objection. That is the best honey produced. Pres. York — The only objection then, is, that we don't get enough of it! Mr. Colburn — I have heard the suggestion that it was not as good as white clover honey. I have been in localities where I got both, and I confess I like the white best. The sweet clover is very fine — ^it is very far ahead of anything else in looks, but I don't think the quality is as good as the white clover. If you can get it mixed it is good. Mr. Becker — I think sweet clover is all right, providing there is no other honey with it. I have had experience with sweet clover. We don't get it pure in our neighborhood. Whenever we take it to Springfield we have to have our sales made before we get there to get rid of it. They don't like it in that locality. I bought some from New York, four or five years ago, when there was no honey at all in our part of the country, not even an ounce, and I took it down to the State fair to make my exhibit, and then sold it out; and the store keepers who sold the honey use to tell me, "Becker, you have ruined by honey-trade." They said, "That isn't honey." Pres. York — ^Didn't you get a premium on that honey? Mr. Becker — Yes. [Laughter.] Mr. Kannenberg — I think it depends a good deal on the man that sells the honey, and how to educate the people to taste the honey. I think if Mr. Becker educated his people to get the honey they liked they would eat it just the same. Pres. York — Probably there is not enough of it produced. Mr. Colburn— I have in my place three different kinds of honey. There is another kind of honey I have had put into sections and supers ; I don't know what source it comes from. It is white, though not snow-white like sweet clover ; it has a slightly muddy tint. That honey has no more flavor to it than so much sugar syrup. As soon as I discovered it I stopped selling it, because I said everybody that tastes that will swear it is sugar syrup and nothing else. I would like to know if anybody else has had any experience with it. ?;;%/#, 180 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT I think it comes about between white clover and spring clover. Mr. Meredith — Is it honey-dew? Mr. Opfer — Here is a bottle of sweet clover honey, and I would like anybody in the audience to show better honey than this. It depends a good deal on the man that produces the sweet clover honey in my opinion. Pres. York — I am satisfied that Mr. Opfer's sample is pure sweet clover honey. I have had lots of it. Yellow Sweet Clover. Mr. Moore — I would like to say a word on this honey question. I sold to my customers some sweet clover honey in Chicago, seven or eight years ago, and it is only recently I have gotten away from the effects of it. Any one who asks which is best, I say, "There is no best; it is simply a question of what you are used to." This market is used to clover and basswood flavors. They get their honey from -;Ij.. STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 181 Illinois, Iowa, Wisconsin and Michigan, where the pre- ponderance is white clover and basswood. I know a major- ity will have sweet clover honey. Where they get to like it, it is liked as well as anything else. But this honey ques- tion is purely a matter of taste. They want what they have all their lives been used to, and they will absolutely condemn and call impure anything else. Mr. Becker — As far as sweet clover honey is concerned, I have no objection whatever; it is a very fine honey. But when you take out a section of sweet clover honey there is the peculiar smell to it that is not in any other honey, and I think that is the part that people do not like. When you taste the honey it is as fine tasting as any honey, but it has that peculiar smell that you can smell in the growing sweet clover a hundred yards off before you reach it. LABELING SECTION HONEY. "What might be the disadvantage of a label covering all four sides of a section, printed matter being on all four sides?" Mr. Fluegee — I should think it would be daubbed up with honey and get soiled. Mr. Wilcox — ^Retail dealers might not like it, and that is a serious objection. They won't want to advertise your honey for you, by distributing it among their customers; they would sooner order direct from the producer. Pres. York — I take it that the questioner means printed matter concerning the production of honey, or proof of the purity, and not as an advertising card. Mr. Wilcox — 1 see no necessity for any printed matter on comb honey unless your name is on it as a guaranty of purity. Pres. York — At the St. Louis convention the question was asked whether it might be well to print something right on the wood of the sections by the manufacturers, calling attention to the fact that there is no such thing as manu- factured comb honey, or something of that kind. But I doubt if people would stop to read it, anyway. Take the cities where most of the comb honey is sold, the servant girls get it, and I don't think they would stop to read any- thing printed on the sections. Still, they might. Mr. Moore — It seems to me if any one wants to put printed matter on it, the carton is the very best method, and you 'can print them all over, and as much of it will be read as any other printed matter we send out. THANKS TO MR. ROOT. " Mr. Moore — I move that we present to Mr. E. R. Root, towards his expenses, the sum of $5. Now, inasmuch as he has absolutely refused to accept anything, and says he will donate this sum to our foul brood fund ; and inasumch as our whole assembly was greatly entertained and interested by his exhibition of last night, I move you a vote of thanks • 1 ^ ^ ■ 'i^£^£^«(^^^^5d^£^^^i^^£i&£^t^..d;l^J^t^4^ 182 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT be given to Mr. Root for his very fine exhibition of last evening. Mr. Kannenburg — I second that motion. The President put the motion, which was carried unani- mously. EXPERIENCE WITH ALFALFA HONEY. "Has any one had any experience with alfalfa honey, and with what success?" Pres. York — I don't know whether it means producing alfalfa honey, or handling it, or eating it, or what. I would say it is very good to eat. Mr. Becker — I want to say I don't know anything about its production. I know that alfalfa won't produce honey in our locality. But alfalfa honey as a honey I have sold on the market, and I think it is equal to white clover, or next to it, none excepted. It sells readily; everybody likes it. And there is another thing about it, there are a great many persons that cannot eat honey, but alfalfa they can eat in great quantities. I would advise those that handle alfalfa honey, or sweet clover honey, if the store-keepers will not sell it, to mix it with some darker honey, for instance with heartsease or even buckwheat. Buckwheat I have not had for a good many years, but I use heartsease and Spanish- needle. Invariably in my locality they say this alfalfa honey looks too much like sugar; it hasn't the color of honey. I sell a great deal of it every winter. When I get this honey at this time, and I am out of other honey, I go around and get some Spanish-needle and heartsease honey, and heat it all and melt it in order to produce a different color of honey. Alfalfa is too light a color to sell in the stores. But as to alfalfa, it outsells almost any other kind of honey. The regular stenographer, Mr. Angus, having to leave for his train at this time, Mr. Hutchinsin kindly reported the balance of tne session as follows : PAPER PAILS AS RETAIL PACKAGES FOR HONEY. Mr. Abbott — A man in Colorado expressed to me a paper pail full of alfalfa honey. It reached me in good condition, and was of fine quality. It stood around in the office two days, when, by that time, it had all been eaten. If we could get hold of somethiner like this to put up honey in for retail, it would be a fine thing. ALFALFA HONEY CANDIES READILY. Mr. Wheeler — When we mention alfalfa honey we are advertising a Colorado product; we ought to advertise our own honey. I have found that alfalfa honey candies very readily. Pres. York — I have found that alfalfa candies very readily, and comb honey of this variety ought to be sold before cold weather comes on. STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. l83 IS PURE ALFALFA HONEY HARD TO GET? Some members expressed their doubts of the possibility of getting pure alfalfa honey. They thought it was largely mixed with sweet clover. Mr. lAbbott — I have been eating sweet clover honey for 20 years, and I don't think you can fool me with it. We get some honey from the West that is not all alfalfa, but I have no trouble in getting water-white alfalfa honey. A bottle of honey, supposed to be sweet clover, was then passed around. Pres. York — I have handled tons of sweet clover honey, and I should say that this is a sample of pure, sweet clover honey. Mr. Snell — I get no surplus from alfalfa, but we have sent for some of the bacteria with which to inoculate the soil, and are hopeful of better results. WHAT IS AN UP-TO-DATE APIARY? Mr. Horstmann — Where all of the hives are of approved pattern, the weeds and grass kept mowed, where there is an extractor used, and everything kept neat and clean. Mr. Wilcox — I suppose that no old straw hives are used, and everything is kept neat. HAS ALFALFA HONEY SPECIAL MEDICINAL QUALITIES ? Pres. York — I have never heard that alfalfa honey pos- sessed any special medicinal properties. I believe that bass- wood has been given that distinction. Mr. France — I have sold my dandelion honey at an ad- vanced price because of its supposed medicinal qualities. Mr. Abbott — I suppose that all honey has medicinal quali- ties if it is used rightly. It is peculiarly effective in bronchial diseases. SHEEP FOR KEEPING DOWN GRASS IN THE APIARY. Mr. Reynolds — Sheep sometimes knock over the hives. Mr. Wilcox— I don't know as I would at all times turn in the sheep, but, in the honey season, it seems to me it would be all right. Mr. France — In procuring a site for an out-apiary, I select a pasture. The stock soon learns to work in the apiary at night. If hogs have to the yard, I want the hogs to have rings in their noses. CAN HONEY-VINEGAR BE MADE AT A PROFIT? Mr. Meredith — Waste honey can be used profitably for that purpose. Mr. France — We can get a good price for honey-vinegar in our home market where we and the vinegar are known. I would advise the use of waste honey from washing cap- pings, the washing of dishes that have contained honey, etc. WaJfeSiii .JS-zi^ik;,' ;Mij.> v.. ,.:=.^ ^, :■-■: ~i- ^',vi- -i:;: -.:.,. j^-^:-^^ V i 184 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Mr. Wilcox — If we have honey that will sell at 4 or 5 cents per pound, can it be made into vinegar with profit? Mr. France — I think not. Mr. Hoffman — Give the process for manufacturing vine- gar. Mr. France — Make a solution of honey and water that will float an egg, then let it stand until it has turned to vinegar. That is all there is to it. There are quicker proces- ses than this — those that expose it to the air more thoroughly than this — but it will not pay the ordinary bee-keeper to bother with them. SAMPLES OF HONEY. As a drawing card for the National convention that was held at -St. Louis, Mr. France collected pound-samples of different varieties of honey from different States. After securing them it was impossible to display them, as out- siders kept slipping in and carrying them off. It was quite interesting to see how the same variety of honey differed in different parts of the country. Mr. France had with him, and placed upon exhibition, small samples of the varieties of honey that he had gathered. ''brick honey." Mr. Root exhibited a sample of candied cut up as they cut it up into "bricks," and surround the packages with para- fiined paper, with parchment paper over that. It can be sold only in a local market, as the public in general does not understand about the candying of honey, and, if kept over until warm weather, it will become too soft; in fact, only such honey as candies hard can be used. Mr. France — Have you tried Southern honey? Mr. Root — No, we have not. Mr. Kimmey — How will it be next summer? Mr. Root — It will be soft. As I have said, it must be sold while the weather is still cold. I would not advocate it for use away from home. Mr. Duby — I have calls for candied honey here in Chi- cago. Mr. Moore — There is no trade in candied honey here in Chicago, unless it has been worked up. HOW SHALL WE BEST MARKET COMB HONEY? Mr. Abbott — It depends upon the locality. Mr. Becker — My plan is to put the honey up in an attractive package. I make three grades. There is a first and a second grade, and then the culls. Sell in the home market if possible. A home market is lasting, once it is established. Shipping honey without loss from breakage is an art. I have bought lots of honey from Mr. York, and never yet had a particle of loss from leakage in shipping. Mr. Reynolds — An agent, or seller of honey, sometimes makes sales, and gets the start of some other seller, by show- STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 185 ing that his honey is of light-weight — that is, the sections do not quite weigh a pound each, and there is more profit in their sale. Mr. Becker — I have seen that done, but I always sell by weight. Mr. Moore — I found, in Indiana, merchants who were selling 2,000 or 3,000 pounds of honey each year. I found that tiiey did it by keeping it in sight — put up in nice show- cases. Sell honey close at home, then it will not be smashed. Mr. Duby — I have sold as much as 1,000 pounds of honey at a fair, and I find it an excellent place to advertise. Mr. Meredith — At Mill Park, where there were excur- sions from schools, I have sold as much as 400 pounds of honey in one day. Mr. Wilcox — First decide at what price honey will sell. Put it up in the best style. Sell it near home. If not pos- sible, then put it in the hands of commission men. Next came an address by Prof. E. N. Eaton, State Analyst of the Illinois Food Commission, on FOOD FRAUDS AND FOOD OFFICIALS. Again I have the privilege and the honor — and I assure you it is a privilege and an honor — of appearing before the Chicago-Northwestern Bee-Keepers' Association. I believe I feel as much interest in your Association, its members and its meetings, as I would had I as large an apiary as Mrs. Stow, or as much knowledge of the bee as Dr. Miller, in- stead of no knowledge of the ways of the bee except as a warrior, and no earthly possessions in that line — not even a bee in my bonnet. Last October I read before the National Association a paper on "Food Frauds," laying special stress on the misrepresentation of comb honey, and the damage such misrepresentation has done to the sale of that commodity. Mr. York has suggested that I bring the same subject before this Association, inasmuch as there are many in at- tendance at this convention who were unable to get to the National, and the records of that convention will not be available for some time. Many years ago Dr. Wiley, now chief chemist of the United States Department of Agriculture, stated that comb honey was being made artificially, comb and all. That story went the rounds of the press, and, despite frequent denials, appears in papers to this day, even in such reliable publica- tions as the Ladies' Home Journal, the Chicago Tribune, and the Philadelphia Press. When cornered Dr. Wiley claimed that the statement was "a scientific pleasantry," and that the bee-keepers — simple children of Nature — ^were too obtuse to see the joke. The public and the public press, however, took it as seriously as did the bee-keepers, and consequently Dr. Wiley's reputation as a joker suffered a serious relapse. There have been many variations of "the Wiley lie," as the statement has been referred to by bee-keepers. State Food Commissions have said that bees entered the conspiracy, and were fed glucose to produce honey. Other Food Com- -'ki'^i^l:^''^jJ. :V»-. ■Wi::-rc?i^*CT-ei^=^A^iiK«r-:ifci-iV".-^v«^^^ 186 rOIITJTTI AXXT'AI. I^F.PORT ini-^^i(]ns cumcntcd lluinsc1\rs willi iH-pcalinj^ llu' original lie witlR)Ut variritinn. lliit all liad llu' .■^anu■ effect — to (jrcjiulice tin- i)ul)lic against the pureliase of imre eomh lione}, and, to a certain extent, oi honey of all kinds. I need not tell an as- sociation of l)ee-kee])ers tiiat snch stories are made out of whole cloth. They are in fact lies — however, not malicious lies, as 1 douht not they largely come through ignorance. As to the remedy 1 would infringe on the copyright of Presi- dent l-Joosevelt. and suggest juihlirity. I'^very food commis- sioner and chemist should do his part to correct the false impres.-.ion which has heen made, and 1 assure vou in hehalf State Analyst K. N. Eaton. of Conunissioner Jones antl myself, that we will do our part. Another matter in which the hee-keepcrs have of late evinced much interest, is the chemical composition of hone}'. Owing t hei-'u nuich confusion among hee-keepers. as to whether or mil glucose is a normal constituent of honey. In taking uj) this matter 1 wish to call \-our attention io a pamphlet just receixed. dehning honey and setting" standards for the same, 'l^ie iianiphlet i> a part of a report from a STATE r.F.F-KREPF.RS' ASSOrTATrnX. 187 committee of standards ni the Assnciatimi of OiTicial Ai^ri- eulttiral Chemists, and as their standards have lieen recoo- nized liy t!ie United Stales Secretary of ( Ai4ricultnre, they l)ecome important and authoritative. 'I'lie standard and defi- nition of honey are as follows: "1. Honey is the nectar and saccharine exudations of plants gathered, modified, and stored in the com!) hy honey- bees (Apis mcllifica). It is l;evo-rotatory. contains not more than twenty— five (2.")) percent of water, not more than twen- ty-five hundredths ((».2."») percent of ash, and not more than eight (S) percent of sucrose. "2. Cunib honey is honey contained in the cells of comb. '".]. Extracted honey is hone}- which has been separated from the uncrushed comb by centrifugal force or gravity. "4. Strained honey is honey removed from the crushed comb by straining or other means." My quarrel with these standards is in the definition for honey, which I maintain is too sweeping, and incorrect. Strictly speaking, honey — commercial honey — should be limited to the nectar of flowers. Louse honey, or honey- dew honey, or pine-tree honey, are not, and should not be, sold to consumers for honey. Again, honey is not nectar nor saccharine, but a manufactured product, made by the bees, changed from its original condition. There is, of course, such a thing as honey from bumble- bees and no doubt other bees, but the only honey of com- merce is produced by the honey-bee, and to this bee the definition properly should be restricted. I would therefore suggest that the definition for honey be that suggested by me to the National Association of State Food Commissions, which is this : Commercial honey is the nectar of flowers, transformed, and stored in a comb by the honey-bee. As these schedules are subject to revision, it might be wise, if the Association looks at this matter in the light that I do, to take some action, preferably by resolution. A word as to the condition of the Illinois honey mar- kets in regard to purity, and I am done : Before the Illinois Food law became operative fully :;.'! l-l! percent of the extracted honey on the market was adulterated. Since then the adulteration has grown less, until last year, when we found seven samples of adulterated extracted honey out of :2S samples analyzed. However, in all but one case, the adul- terant was cane-sugar, and in several cases it was impi>s- sible to tell whether it had been intentionally added or fed to bees. This year, while only a few samples were analyzed, none have been found adulterated. It seems that adultera- tion of honey with glucose is almost a thinsi" of the jiast. "E. X. K.\Tox. I\Tr. Moore — Isn't the change of cane-sugar to grape- sugar the same as that made l)y the bees? Prof. Eaton — I think not. Mr. Kimme}- — Can chemical science make honey? Prof. Eaton — No. 188 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT Mr. McCain — I supposed that the nectar was changed to honey while in the sac of the bee. Isn't that true? Prof. Eaton — I am inclined to think that the change is begun in the sac. Mr. Abbott — This question of nectar and honey has been threshed over again and again. When the nectar is put into a cell I think it is still nectar. I don't agree with Prof. Cook, that honey is partly-digested nectar. Cane- sugar stored in the combs is still cane-sugar, and will re- main such, Prof. Cook to the contrary notwithstanding, and Emerson T. Abbott. I want Prof. Cook to know that I say this. I would like to know if Prof. Eaton agrees with Prof. Cook. Prof. Eaton — I must admit that I got most of my in- formation on this subject from Prof. Cook, and I am in- clined to agree with him. Mr. Kimmey — If I feed the bees 20 pounds of honey or sugar, and then find only 14 pounds in the combs, let me ask where the difference has gone to? Mr. Moore — It has been used up in household economy. Prof. Cook has said that if we feed sugar to the bees, honey will be the result. If this is true, then what kind of honey is it? STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 189 Mr. Wheeler — The matter of honey-dew is important. If there was any honey-due in our honey we might be ac- cused of adulterating our honey. Mr. Root — Mr. Selser and Prof. Eaton agree exactly as to the proper definition for honey, but this point raised by Mr. Wheeler is really most important. Suppose I am a beginner, and I unknowingly put honey-dew upon the mar- ket, there is danger of prosecution, in which injustice will be done. Prof. Eaton — I might say that I do not agree with Prof. Cook in every point. One point is that I do not be- lieve that when bees are fed cane-sugar the result is true honey. It would be lacking in the natural flavor of true honey. In regard to the best definition for honey I think that practical bee-keepers are the best judges as to what this definition should be. The matter is really important, however, as decisions in important suits may turn upon the definition that the courts are guided by. It was moved by Mr. Moore that the chair appoint a committee of three to look after this matter of securing a proper definition for honey. Dr. Miller, C. P. Dadant and E. T. Abbott were appointed. Upon motion of Mr. Horstmann it was voted the Asso- ciation pay the Secretary $20 for his services. DEFINITION AND STANDARD FOR HONEY. In reply to a question, Prof. Eaton said that he con- sidered 25 percent of water in honey was a high percentage for a standard. About 22 percent is as much water as was ever found, but he thought it better to be safe, and put it at 25 percent. Eight percent sucrose is also a high per- centage. He had no objections to offer to the standard as proposed for honey. Mr. France — I suppose that these standards will become authority. If they do, and the proposed definition is also made authentic, then I am ready to quit bee-keeping. My honey this year would be pronounced adulterated if judged by the proposed definition. Upon motion of Mr. Moore, a vote of thanks was given Prof. Eaton for his paper. Thanks were also tendered the proprietor of the Revere house for his courtesy and kindness in furnishing a room for the meeting. Mr. Root was also remembered with a vote of thanks for his entertainment with the stereopticon. The convention then adjourned to meet at the call of the Executive Committee. -I- ::.-i.:::ii,n-5\^^ 190 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT INDEX. Absconding of Shook Swarms 89 Advantage of Shook-Swarming 112 Advantages of the " Wisconsin Hive " 91 Advertising Honey as a Health Food 136 Alfalfa Honey Candies Readily 182 Baby Nuclei and Mating Queens % Bee-Keeping for Women , 168 Bees as Property, and Assessable 155 Black Brood 26, 159 Breaking Down Prices of Honey 136 Brick Honey 100, 184 Can Honey- Vinegar be Made at a Profit ? 183 Cash for Proof of Adulterated Comb Honey 127 Constitution and By-Laws State Association 9 Co-operation Among Bee-Keepers 34 Definition and Standard of Honey 189 Detecting Adulteration of Beeswax 119 Detecting Foul ^rood 160 Dispensing with the Bee-Veil 110 Effect of Market Reports on Honey-Prices 114 Exhibits and Prizes at Conventions 174 Experience with Alfalfa Honey 182 Extracting from Combs Having Brood 117 Food Frauds and Food Officials 185 Formaldehyde Experiments 27 Formation State Association 12 Foul Brood and Other Bee-Diseases 17 STATE bee-keepers' ASSOCIATION. 1^ Fruit-Tree Blight and Bees 67 Guarding Against Foul Brood 62 Has Alfalfa Honey Special Medicinal Qualities ? 183 Horizontal Wiring of Comb Foundation 116 How Shall We Best Market Comb Honey ? 184 Increasing the Circulation of Bee-Papers 123 Is Pure Alfalfa Honey Hard to Get ? 183 Keeping Brood Out of Sections 63 Labeling Section Honey 181 Laws on Bee-Keeping 103 Mailing Infectious Material 168 National Honey Exchange 126 Ought Bees to be Assessed ? 64 Outdoor Wintering of Bees 114 Paper Pails as Retail Packages for Honey 182 Pickled Brood 24, 159 Pressure of the German Wax-Press , 171 Preventing Adulteration of Extracted Honey 66 Prevention of Robbing During a Honey-Flow 117 Proposed Apiary Bills 14, 16 Protecting Hives from Sun Heat 175 Queens Killed when Introducing. ." , 119 Queen's Wing and Leg Growing 113 Regulating Prices of Honey , 65 Re-introducing a Balled Queen 106 Report Illinois State Convention 29 Report of Chicago-Northwestern Convention 81 Report of State Inspector 78, 140 Samples of Honey 184 Selling Honey Through Grocers 76 Sheep for Keeping Down Grass in the Apiary 183 " Shook " or " Shaken " Swarm Ill Shook-Swarming- 102 Size of Colonies of Bees in Spring 117 Stanley Method of Queen-Rearing 104 Starting with Bees 114 State Inspection of Apiaries in Illinois 38 Sweet Clover Honey 179 Talk on Foul Brood Among Bees 40 Thermometer in the Bee-Cellar 82 What is an Up-to-Date Apiary ? 183 Wintering Bees 68 Wiring Brood-Frames with Starters 177 Working for Comb Honey 71 rrV..-^^ '^fTi?;^- '-■■-•*■ '>s'--'^..-_-. " -7.. ^^*■J-'■vlf.>. .^-js,-*^'- .■■-;«■■ X''-. 192 FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT ILLUSTRATIONS. Abbott, Emerson T 188 Baby Nuclei and Queen Mating 98, 99, 100 Becker, Chas^ 55 Dadant, C. P 36 Detecting Foul Brood 162 Dittmer, Gus 167 Eaton, E. N 186 Prance, N. E 41 Harrison, Mrs. L 146 Hutchinson, W. Z 176 Miller, Dr. C. C 141 Moore, Herman F 95 Newman, Thomas G 148 Observation Hive for Sitting-Room Window 80 Root, Ernest R 172 Smith, J. Q 31 Stone, Jas. A 48 Stow, Mrs. N. L 88 Sweet Clover— White 178 Sweet Clover — Yellow 180 Wilcox, F , 151 Wilson, Miss Emma M 170 York, George W 83 rv ?^SSS?"eBf=^K^ '