TECHNOLOGY, CLASS-CONFLICT, EMPLOYMENT 595 consequently requisite cultural changes have failed to keep pace. These assumptions require us to imagine that the peasant three-quarters of Mankind will not yet have lost their immemorially old habit of repro- ducing their kind up to the limits of their means of.subsistence; and this assumption in turn requires us to imagine them still to be expending on increases in their head of population all the additional means of sub- sistence that will have been placed in their hands by the establishment of a World Order that will have brought in its train the benefits of peace, police, hygiene, and the application of Science to the production of food. Such prognostications would not be fantastic; they would merely be projections of current tendencies into the future. In China, for example, increases in the head of population had swallowed up increases in the means of subsistence which had been bestowed on the peasantry in China by the introduction of previously unknown food crops from the Americas in the sixteenth century of the Christian Era and by the estab- lishment, in the seventeenth century, of a Pax Manchuana. Thanks to the naturalization of maize in China circa A.D. 1550, of sweet potatoes circa A.D. 1590, and of pea-nuts at the turn of the sixteenth and seven- teenth centuries, the population had risen from the 63,599,541 indi- cated by the returns in the census of A.p. 1578 to an estimated figure of 108,300,000 in Ax>. 1661—and this in spite of the fact that in the interval between these two dates this spurt in the growth of population had been partly offset by the mortality arising from Chinese civil disorders and Manchu military operations in the anarchic transition to the Manchu regime from the Ming.1 Thereafter, under the Manchu Peace, the popu- lation had continued to rise to 143,411,559 *n A-D* I74I an