134 DANGEROUS THOUGHTS industrialism produces the things men need most than with demanding that everyone should have access to any trash it is capable of producing. In view of the rising popularity of Fascist doctrines, it is important to emphasize that the distribution of purchasing power to increase the volume of effective demand is essentially different from the view held by the pioneers of Socialism fifty or a hundred years ago, and it would have been regarded by them as a capitulation to the prevailing doctrine of laisser-faire, against which they revolted. Men like Owen and Morris were far less taken in by the glamour of capitalism than ourselves. They were not content to criticize it because it distributed its products unjustly, or because it was incapable of producing as large a quantity of goods as a planned economy could deliver. They also, and more especially, attacked it because it was not producing the kind of goods which are good for people to want and to strive for, and they were not hypnotized by the liberal delusion that things people have been educated to demand by capitalist advertisement are necessarily the things they need most. To-day we are apt to dismiss their lament on the ugliness which capitalist enterprise has bequeathed us as mere aestheticism with no significance for a realistic political programme. In this context realism implies a servile acceptance of the three cardinal errors of early capitalist ideology. The first is the assumption that the greatest good of the greatest number is achieved by producing the greatest number of saleable goods and ensuring that the greatest number of people can take their choice. The second is that the large community is a necessary condition of high pro- ductive capacity. The third is that peace between nations can only be ensured by maximum division of labour with free trade. I believe that each of these postulates is biologically false, and that the results of acting as if they were true will be biologically disastrous. If Socialism accepts the distribution of purchasing power as its primary and sole concern, its success will merely aggravate the tendencies which have made capitalism a biological failure. Meanwhile it will not disarm criticism by capitulating to