EDUCATION FOR AN AGE OF PLENTY 153 Education, which will help us to preserve democracy and to assure its further progress by mobilizing the will to constructive social effort, has urgent need for knowledge about the growth of social classes and the aspirations of citizens at different social levels. The professors of economic tautology in our universities cannot give answers to the questions we put. Their Marxist critics offer us a barren dialectic of social classes when our need is for factual analysis of social structure and social behaviour. It seems that the Adult Education Movement has only one course if it is to discharge a creative function in the Age of Potential Plenty and to meet the challenge of dictatorships to democratic ideals in education. We must not be'content to take from the universities the crumbs that fall from the rich man's table. We must not turn a disillusioned ear to doctrinaire Marxism. We must ask ourselves what kind of knowledge we need if we wish to equip ourselves for the task of organizing the social exploitation of the new resources which science has pkced at our disposal. In so far as the universities can provide men who have this knowledge we must welcome their co-operation. In so far as men with a university training can seek this knowledge we must encourage their efforts. In so far as the universities have failed to do so we must subject university teaching to vigorous and outspoken criticism. In the past there have been two movements for adult education among die working classes of this country. One, the W.E.A., has been too content to let the universities dictate its policy. The other, represented by the Central Labour Colleges, has carried on its work with very little assistance from people with a highly specialized training. The orientation of the policy for which I plead differs from that of both. The universities have vast resources of knowledge. Much of their work in training doctors, engineers, chemists, and the like would be carried out in very much the same way in any rationally organized society. So the criticisms which have been levelled against the universities in some quarters have been often ill- informed and far too sweeping. Well-merited criticisms which