l6 ENGLISHSAGA Monarque, Revolutionary Tribune and Military Empire. They had almost untrammelled power; they gambled, hunted, drank and whored, they feared no man, they did what was good in their own eyes, yet they did it with some measure of moderation and restraint. In this they differed from other tyrants and were like the ancient Athenians. By the time our chapter of English history begins, they were already past their prime and starting to decline. One sees them in the tell-tale pages of Mr. Creevey: with their rentals multiplied out of all measure by improved agriculture and urban expansion,1 but already divorced by their staggering wealth from that close contact with reality and their humbler fellow citizens which had enabled their forebears to obtain power. Their ruling passion was the chase. Their tragedy was that they were getting spoilt by their own excessive wealth and power. Such a one was the great Lambton of Durham—a man who in his lightning moods beat his footmen, insulted his guests and declaimed against the very privileges which enabled him to do these things with impunity. He was called King Jog having once remarked that a man could always "jog along" on £70,000 a year. At its best the ruling caste was exemplified in the Duke of Wellington. The younger son of a music-loving, dilettante lord, a colonel at twenty-four and a major-general at thirty-three, privilege—unasked and unsought—had enabled him To turn a forlorn Iberian adventure into one of the most glorious chapters of British military history, to fling back the hordes of advancing Revolution and humble Napoleon himself on the field of Water- loo. All this had happened before his forty-seventh year; since then he had served his country as selflessly in the senate as in the field. Now at the age of seventy-one he was the greatest public figure in the nation. Without any of the arts that sway popular opinion—which he unreservedly despised—he had accustomed himself from his earliest years to a fearlessness in speech that took the form of a literal and uncompromising truth on every occasion. Eight years before at the time of the Reform Bill—a measure he had opposed in the teeth of popular frenzy on the grounds that sooner or later it must lead to a suicidal scramble for power—he had had his windows broken by the very mob who a little while before had acclaimed him as the victor of Waterloo. But he was 1Those of the Shakerleys, a typical north country family, increased tenfold between 1760 and 1830. . ,