54 ENGLISHSAGA dominions, removed from the statute book the barbarous laws that condemned men to the pillory and women to the lash, reduced from more than a hundred and fifty to six the crimes punishable by death and rendered illegal the cruel sports of cock- fighting and bull-baiting. These humanitarians rigidly opposed the infliction of all needless pain except in the factories and mines of England. For here, in their view, it could not be avoided. This melancholy and fatalistic attitude towards industrial suffering was bound up with the high hopes which had been formed of human nature by the idealists of the eighteenth century. It was this that made it so formidable. The age of reason saw the birth of a belief that challenged the older notion of revealed religion and morality. By the light of the untram- melled mind, man would be able to attain to perfection. Only two things were necessary: that he should strictly observe natural law and be freed from every antiquated legal shackle, supersti- tion and custom that prevented him from following his will according to the light of his own reason. The emancipation of the individual reason was the key to a new era of happiness and perfection. Man was born free: he had only to rid himself of his chains to enter into' his heritage. In France this theory, first preached by philosophers and later accepted as a social truism, had resulted in the storming of the Bastille,, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Revolutionary and Napoleonic armies. In sober commercial England it had taken a more prosaic form. Expounded for more than half a century by a rich and respectable philanthropist of genius, the promotion of "the greatest happiness of the greatest number" had become the polite faith of nine "enlightened" English reformers out of ten. It was Jeremy Bentham's belief that that happiness could most readily be realised by the free exercise on the part of every individual of enlightened self-interest. Complete freedom of contract was the very core of the utilitarian creed. Any denial of it by the State could only delay and perhaps defeat the bene- ficent purposes of Providence. A theory, running counter to the whole course of English social history, was thus employed both by members of the government and by manufacturers, as well as by academic economists, to justify almost any suffering or inhumanity. Employers and employed must be left free to make whatever