198 ENGLISH SAGA The same government introduced an Artisans' Dwelling Bill, empowering local authorities to demolish insanitary dwellings and replace them by houses built expressly for working men. The measure was not compulsory but only permissive.1 It was no more than a tentative beginning: a mere drop in the still rising ocean of slum. Yet its ultimate effect was revolutionary. For it revived, in however dim a form, the ancient ideal of the state as the guardian of the people's homes. Behind all this legislation lay the silent voting power of the workers. In 1874 there were returned to the House of Commons two men who were to be the pioneers of a mighty army. Even at the time Alexander Macdonald and Thomas Burt, the first two working-class M.P.'s, were something of a portent among the landed squires and thriving manufacturers at Westminster. Burt was Secretary of the Northumberland Miners* Association, which, by helping to establish that the occupants of colliery houses, though not paying rates direct, were entitled to voting rights like the compound householders in the towns, had secured a majority of pitmen in the constituency of Morpeth. These representatives of the sons of toil tended at first to vote with Disraeli's "gentlemen of England" rather than with his oppon- ents. Macdonald told his constituents in 1879 that the Conserva- tive party had "done more for the working classes in five years than the Liberals in fifty." For the old Jew, now nearing his end, for all his absorption in duchesses and oriental splendour, believed in a tory democracy and saw in the working man, with his native prejudices and conservative instincts, an ally against the levelling ^utilitarian forces he had fought all his life. He did not believe that the simple, pleasure-loving Englishman in the craftsman's square cap and apron wanted the drab uniformity so dear to Benthamite pedants. In his own phrase he made it his task to " soften the feelings of the working multitude.*12 By redressing injustices he sought to end the fatal gulf between the "two Englands" which more clearly than any other public man he had perceived in his * * Permissive legislation," Disraeli explained, "is the character of a free people. It is easy to adopt compulsory legislation when you have to deal with those who only exist to obey, but |n a free country and especially a country like England, you must trust to persuasion and example as the two great elements if you wish to effect any coonderaHe changes in the manners of the people,*—JMMy>w»y and Buckle, //, 731. * Moaypenry ana Buckle* //, 773.