ENGLISH SAGA Yet, as the theory of social responsibility increasingly haunted the minds of the educated minority, a process characteristically English took place. The larger and better-established capi- talists—and above all their sons—began to devote themselves to the service of the public they or their forebears had fleeced. They did so without hope of further profit and out of a sense of noblesse oblige, gained more often than not at the new public schools which since Arnold of Rugby's days had opened their gates and their ideology to the commercial classes. A new type of public man arose—provincial, aggressive and democratic in method and appeal—whose interest lay neither in foreign policy nor parliamentary debate but in the extension of municipal services. Living on the private wealth acquired or inherited under laissez-faire, they were able to throw their entire energies into the work of mitigating the evils wrought by laissez-faire. These new, and to their individualist fathers' way of thinking, heretical rad- icals were still iconoclastic towards the older notions of privilege and decorum. But though they resented the power of the landed aristocracy and lost no opportunity of humbling it, they were no enemies to the capitalist and manufacturer. The very inroads they made on laissez-faire practice helped to maintain the prestige and opportunities of their class by appeasing the social unrest of the masses. The most famous of these local radical reformers was Joseph Chamberlain, the dapper young hardware merchant with the orchid, the monode and the terrible republican senti- ments who became Mayor of Birmingham in 1873 at 37, and President of the Board of Trade in Mr, Gladstone's second Administration in 1880. In all this the domestic history of Britain during the last two decades of the nineteenth and the first of the twentieth century constituted the first act of a great revolution. During these years a vigorous capitalist and less vigorous but still powerful aristo- cratic England were converted to an elementary socialism whose basis was that the weak and inefficient should constitute a first charge on the strong and able. The pioneer activities of a humane and intelligent minority of their own members contributed to that conversion. But the real driving force came from the superior votes of the urban workers, which by a third Reform Act in 1884 had been reinforced by those of the county house- holders. The ruling dasses did not consciously admit their conversion,