234 NORDIC BALLADS for public recitations (et nostro adhuc saeculo etiam in triviis cantitata). The language of this song was doubtless not that of the sixteenth-century ballads we now read; the plot may have been more fully expounded, but it cannot have extended to more than the single significant episode. The poem was of unknown age even in the middle years of the twelfth century (adhuc etiam). Mimicon and Roddyngar are named by John Bromton in the fourteenth cen- tury, and Mimecan by Matthew of Westminster, From the time of our first quotation there are fixed points in all versions of the legend: the victim is an empress of Germany, married to a Henry; she is condemned to be burned if no champion will appear; no champion dares to fight the accuser save one who is a dwarf or comes from a distance; the champion belongs to the poet's own land. The Danish ballad is identical with the English one in all essentials; Gunhild's name persists in the Icelandic, Faeroese, and some Danish versions. Professor R. W. Chambers has indicated, in a lecture delivered in Manchester, that the function of this legend was consolation. The ruined Anglo-Saxons comforted themselves with a tale of their lost dynasty, in which a Saxon hero vanquished an oppressor seemingly as all-powerful as the Norman lords. If this be so, the ballad is all the more pertinent to the Norman dynasty. Its later development is not entirely confined to balladry, since it passed into romance, with the Earl of Toulouse; to the historical novel in Gines Perez de Hita's Guerras de Granada] to the moral apologue in Don Juan Manuel's Conde Lucanor; to the opera in Wagner's Lohengrin. When Ariosto talks of the 'aspre legge di Scozia' as condemning peccant wives to the flames, he bears witness that the old English motif has become anybody's plaything. It is not, as we have seen, original to the English poet; but it was he who gave the story a definitive form, and sent it rolling among his connexions over all Europe. He also created, as it seems, the oldest English ballad. The cycle of Robin Hood and his merry men is historical in so far as he was or was believed to be a real person. Some of them, particularly the older ones, are expressions of a doubtless historical emotion, the feud of Saxon and Norman. Those who oppress are Normans: the sheriff of Nottingham and the richer clergy. The oppressed are Saxons or associated, through their poverty, with the Saxon lower classes. They find a typical representative in Sir