64 FLUIDITY AND PLASTICITY I ra its middle point until it attached itself to the capillary all of the way around, the greatest care being taken not to decrease the diameter of the capillary or change it in any way. Ajiother marked improvement was the introduction of the traps Tl and T2, Fig. 22, for the purpose of easily adjusting the total volume of liquid within the instrument, which they denoted ; 0 as the'' working volume'' to distinguish it from the volume of efflux V. By keeping the work- ing volume constant, the correction for the hydrostatic pressure within the instrument is greatly simplified. Unfortunately Thorpe and Rodger's instru- ment has not come into general use. This is probably due to the following disadvantages: The sealing of the wide tube to the middle of the capillary is difficult to accomplish; and according to Knibbs (1895) and Blanchard (1913) one cannot be sure that the bore of the capillary has not been altered in spite of the utmost precaution. It is practicable to get the dimensions of the capillary and the other constants of the instrument only after the sealing has been, completed. To get them then is a matter of some difficulty if not uncertainty. The instrument is difficult to clean and dry on account of the narrow spaces between the capillary and the wider tube at either side of the constriction R. At the same time the instrument is rather fragile. These difficulties may all be overcome by using ground glass joints between the capillary and the two limbs. Over the ground-glass joints rubber tubing may be stretched and tied and thus any danger of a leak guarded against. The absence of a leak can be proven very easily at any time by simply testing the working volume. By having good ground-glass joints there can be no change in volume due to the change in the expansion of the rubber under the changing head and there can be no solvent action except that on the glass itself. On the other hand, by planing the ends of the capillary off at PIG. 22.—Viscom- etefr of Thorpe and Rodger.