|
||
VARIATION 201
ments, but as activity increased and brains grew, the power of
varying actions to fit varying requirements became consider- able.3' ** As fast as essential faculties multiply, and as fast as the number of organs which co-operate in any given function increases, indirect equilibration through natural selection becomes less and less capable of producing specific adaptations; and remains capable only of maintaining the general fitness of constitution to conditions. The production of adaptations by direct equilibration then takes the first place : indirect equilibration serving to facilitate it. Until at length, among the civilised human races, the equilibration becomes mainly direct: the action of natural selection being limited to the destruction of those who are too feeble to live, even with external aid."
Returning to our scheme of Originative and Direct-
ive Factors, let us inquire into Spencer's views re- garding Variation and Selection.
Spencer recognised three causes of variation. First
there is heterogeneity among progenitors which "generates new deviations by composition of forces " ; in other words new patterns arise from the mingling of diverse hereditary contributions in fertilisation. Secondly, functional variation in the parents produces unlikeness in the offspring; those begotten under different constitutional states are different. In other words, fluctuations of nutrition in the parental body may cause variations in the germ-plasm. [In mammals there are also modifications produced during the pre- natal life of the offspring which are congenital in the sense that they are present at birth in latent or patent form, which do not, however, really affect the germ- plasm since they disappear in the third generation.] Thirdly, an organism exposed to a marked change of external conditions, may have its equilibrium altered, and the offspring maybe influenced. " The larger |
||
|
||