XXXV111 INDIAN CONSTITUTIONAL DOCUMENTS was quite in harmony with the system of patriarchal government1 which prevailed in British India till the early years of the present century; but as a result of the gradual introduction of political reforms in British India that oft-repeated insistence on benevolent government became an anachronism. In the days of Lord Curzon intervention in the interest of benevolent government reached its zenith.2 Lord Curzon's 'vigorous, if unwise, control' disturbed the Princes ; but Lord Minto introduced a new policy.3 tk The expla- nation/' says Dodwell, "lies less in any belated recognition of the princes' rights than in the fact that political movements within British India itself were beginning to dispute the right and autho- rity by which India was governed. Assailed by the intelligentsia, the government looked round naturally for allies and helpers. In 1857 the princes had in general aided to resist the tide of the Mutiny. In 1907 they might aid to slacken the onslaught of poli- tical unrest. They were therefore to be cultivated rather than coerced ".4 This is why Lord Minto spoke of the ' identity of in- terests between the Imperial Government and the Durbars'* Gradually the Princes became—to quote Mahatma Gandhi— " British officers in Indian dress ".5 The policy of rallying the Princes found expression in two significant changes. The Imperial Service Troops, employed for the first time in the Hunza campaign of 1893, provided opportu- nities of military co-operation* In 1914 they were 22,000 strong. The loyalty of the Princes was so assured that the State forces, instead of being looked upon as a source of possible danger,6 were regarded as useful allies. This was a complete repudiation of Lord Wellesley's policy of holding the Indian Princes in check by the subsidiary forces. Secondly, for the sake of political co-operation the old arrangement forbidding the States to enter into relations with each other save through the medium of the British Govern* ment was given up. Lord Lytton, afraid of political unrest, wanted to establish an Indian Privy Council consisting of the leading chiefs, who were to consult with and advise the Governor-General 1 Document No. 31, . 3 Butler Committee Report. 3 Document No. 64, *The Cambridge History of India, Vol. VI, p. 506. 5 Talk with H. N. Brailsford, London, October, 193L 6 See Arthur, Life of Lord Kitchener, Vol. II, pi 135. '