CONTRACTION VS. STRENGTH OF CAST IRON. 455 !, I1 often be found between the " temper " of sands in one r| shop. All three bars were plaeed equidistant in the j mould and ^"ated by means of two upright lt sprues'1 which led down to a runner in the eope extending over the three bars in the center, insuring the filling of the three moulds at the same time with the same hand ladle of iron. The test bars formed in the chill and dampest sand showed a greater contraction than the ones enclosed in the driest sand. I have conducted quite a 11 umber of these tests and always found in. them the same results, those cast in the chill showing the greater contraction. In several cases, the extremes of one flask i^'ave a full one-sixteenth inch difference in the contraction of the three bars. In the extremes be- ! tween the "temper*1 of the wetter and drier sand, I have found a difference of fully one thirty-second part < of an inch to exist in the contraction of two one-half i inch bars poured from the same hand ladle at the same moment, thereby proving" that a test bar as small as tj. one-half inch square or round is altogether too sensi- V live to variation in the " temper" of moulding sand to l be relied upon to afford any true knowledge of the (|i natural contraction of an iron. ; equally divided between two empty #as pipes. Each 1 of these two latter pipes was then rammed, up with " green sand " of a different temper. Each test bar ,es ,u •„ ,i j and ;i,nds pe!' (on of iron, or a ratio of 7.7 iron to i coke, in onler to deliver the melted iron in the same condition as on an ordinary day. In other words, an additional fuel consumption <>!' a little over 3,h per cent, is needed under the above conditions...................... 3,658 units £