|
||
465 XON-VIOLEXCE IN PEACE AND WAR
present. The fact that a mandatory Government is res-
ponsible to the Permanent Mandates Commission, in which the majority of the members represent governments possessing neither mandates nor colonial possessions, is in itself an advance in the direction of internationalism and the humanization of the world. It is regrettable that Gandhi approached our pro-
blem without that fundamental earnestness and passionate search for truth which are so characteristic of his usual treatment of problems. He therefore missed the deeper implications of the Mandates system. He therefore also failed to grasp the unequalled tragedy of Jewish existence. This is the reason w7hy he can justify the phenomenon of five Arab States demanding in London the establishment of a sixth one on the eve of the founding of t\\p other sove- reign Arab governments in Syria and Lebanon, while at the same time sanctioning the denial of refuge to Jews in their old home. This also explains his stand that Arabs must nowhere
be reduced to the status of a minority while tens of mil- lions of Russians, Poles, Czechs, Germans, Irish and Italians live in dozens of countries as ethnic minorities and while Jews live as a persecuted minority on the entire globe. With all my respect for the Mahatma (I doubt if there
is another living man who evokes within me such a moral awareness of his loftiness) I cannot help feeling that in the present instance he has betrayed his inner nature. I cannot avoid the suspicion that, so far as the Palestine problem is concerned, Gandhi allowed himself to be influenced by the anti-Zionist propaganda being conducted among fanatic pan-Islamists. His understandable and .praise- worthy desire for a united front with the Mohammedans apparently misguided and blinded him to significant rea- lities and deprived him of that analytical clarity which is a part of his moral being. Years ago he was, for the same reason, misguided into supporting the agitation for the re-establishment of the Khalifate3 an institution that is at such variance with his general views. Gandhi was wrong |
||
|
||