$\ movement consider a*
# 'Ath-control the of
and the for
i,r< Jevelopment. Suburban
has by a vision of the
<uhurK as a with preferred housing,
where children
on
and communities that are
Low commercial
anj a for low-density li\ ing
also suborbs grow rapidly,
with suburban growth include
a strain on the
infrastructure.

The slow-growth movement, with its
in the 1960s and 1970s, links the

of environmentalists and home-
who want to protect their proper-
ty
Controls designed to limit
may have the effect of reducing
for low-income and moderate-
households, which in turn
their access to the advantages of
communities and jobs.

The exclusionary effects of growth con-
have been challenged under the
equal-protection and due-process clauses

14th amendment, but the results
are mixed. Policies that manage growth

a balance among the tradi-
American values of the right to
property* die expansion of eco-

Growth
in the

Hayward
16pp.

for $5 the
Arrow Highway D6 CA
91763? (714) 621-6825
This study how slow-
growth policies would affect economic
growth in the Inland Empire* which is
the valley area between Kellogg Hill in
Los Angeles County and Banning Pass,
Most of the go\emment economic data
used for this study is for the Riverside-
San Bernardino-Ontario Standard
Metropolitan Statistical Area.

While the rapid growth of the Inland
Empire has fueled some sentiment for
enacting slow-growth policies for the
region, this study argues that growth-
control policies affecting the building
industry would have a significant nega-
tive effect on the entire area's economy.
A U.S. Department of Commerce model

for regional economic activity, RIMS 11,
demonstrates that building activ|
m
.. . — *> ^*i* .,£
linchpin of 1
00000015-1.jpg