aE i ii Woo LIdAOOY WALYDAI prang E.. ý EE AE s UVAE Dialed > st aarti > ee e eR E sty * THE DARWIN MEMORIAL S DOWN HOUSE: DOWNE KENT LIST OF VOLUMES OF THE NATURALIST’S LIBRARY, IN THE ORDER IN WHICH THEY WERE PUBLISHED. . HUMMING-BIRDS, Thirty-six Coloured Plates; with Portrait and Memoir of LINNÆUS. . MONKEYS, Thirty-two Coloured Plates; with Por- trait and Memoir of Burron. . HUMMING-BIRDS, Thirty-two Coloured Plates; with Portrait and Memoir of PENNANT. . LIONS, TIGERS, &c., Thirty-eight Coloured Plates ; with Portrait and Memoir of Cuvier. . PEACOCKS, PHEASANTS, TURKEYS, &c., Thirty Coloured Plates ; with Portrait and Memoir of ARISTOTLE. . BIRDS OF THE GAME KIND, Thirty-two Coloured Plates; with Portrait and Memoir of Sir THomas STAMFORD RAFFLES. . FISHES OF THE PERCH GENUS, &c., Thirty-two Coloured Plates; with Portrait and Memoir of Sir JoseP BANKS. . COLEOPTEROUS INSECTS, (Beetles,) Thirty-two Coloured Plates ; with Portrait and Memoir of Ray. - COLUMBID &, (Pigeons,) Thirty-two Coloured Plates; with Portrait and Memoir of PLINY. - BRITISH DIURNAL LEPIDOPTERA, (Butterflies, ) Thirty-six Coloured Plates; with Portrait and Memoir of WERNER. - RUMINATING ANIMALS; containing DEER, ANTE- LOPES, CAMELS, &c., Thirty-five Coloured Plates ; : with Portrait and Memoir of CAMPER. XI. RUMINATING ANIMALS; containing Goars, Sumer, Wip and Domxstic CAFTLE, &C. &c., Thirty-three Coloured Plates ; with Portrait and Memoir of Jonn Hunrar. il LIST OF VOLUMES. XMI. PACHIDERMATA, or Thick-Skinned Quadrupeds ; consisting of ELEPHANTS, RHINOCEROSES, TAPIRS, &c. &e., on Thirty-one Coloured Plates ; with Por- trait and Memoir of Sir Hans SLOANE. XIV. BRITISH NOCTURNAL LEPIDOPTERA, (Moths, Sphinxes, &c.,) Thirty-two Coloured Plates; with Portrait and Memoir of Mapam MERIAN. XV. PARROTS, Thirty-two Coloured Plates; with Por- trait and Memoir of Berwick, XVI. WHALES, Thirty-two Coloured Plates; with Por- trait and Memoir of LACEPEDE, XVII. BIRDS OF WESTERN AFRICA, Thirty-four Co- loured Plates; with Portrait and Memoir of Rrucz, XVIII. FOREIGN BUTTERFLIES, Thirty-three Coloured Plates ; with Portrait and Memoir of LAMARCK. XIX. BIRDS OF WESTERN AERICA, Vol. IL, Thirty- four Coloured Plates; with Portrait and Memoir of LE VAILLANT. XX. BIRDS OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND, Thirty-six Coloured Plates; with Portrait and Me- moir of Sir ROBERT SIBBALD. XXI. FLYCATCHERS; their Natural Arrangement. and Relations, Thirty-three Coloured Plates; with Por- trait and Memoir of Baron HALLER. XXII. A HISTORY OF BRITISH QUADRUPEDS, Thirty-six Coloured Plates; with Portrait and. Memoir of ULYSSES ALDROVANDI. XXIII. AMPHIBIOUS CARNIVORA ; including the WAL- Rus and SEALs, and the HERBIVORUS CETACEA, Mermaids, &c., Thirty-three Coloured Plates ; with Portrait and Memoir of FRANCOIS PERON. XXIV. BIRDS OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND, Thirty-two Coloured Plates ; with Portrait and Me- moir of WILLIAM SMELLI. XXV. DOGS, Thirty-three Coloured Plates ; with Portrait and Memoir of PALLAS. THE NATURALIST’S LIBRARY. Lngravedtorthe Naturalists Library. VOL. IX. The Dogs of Mt St Bernard. EDINBURGH: W.H.LIZARS. LONDON, SAMUEL HIGHLEY 32. FLEET STREET DUBLIN, W. CURRY JUN® & C9 NATURALIST’S LIBRARY. ‘CONDUCTED BY SIR WILLIAM JARDINE, BART. F. R. S. E., F. L. S., &C. &e. MAMMALIA. VOER DOGS CANIDÆ OR GENUS CANIS OF AUTHORS. INCLUDING ALSO THE GENERA HYÆNA AND PROTELES. BY LIEUT.-COL. CHAS. HAMILTON SMITH, R.H. AND K. W., F.R. AND L, S., PRESIDENT OF THE DEVON AND CORNWALL NAT. HIST. SOCIETY, &C. &C. EDINBURGH: W. H. LIZARS, 3, ST. JAMES’ SQUARE, 8. HIGHLEY, 32, FLEET STREET, LONDON ; AND W. CURRY, JUN. AND CO. DUBLIN. 1839. EDINBURGH: PRINTED BY W. H. LIZARS, 3, ST. JAMES’ SQUARE, 5 THE NATURAL HISTORY OF DOGS. CANIDÆ OR GENUS CANIS OF AUTHORS. INCLUDING ALSO THE GENERA HYHNA AND PROTELES. BY LIEUT.-COL. CHAS. HAMILTON SMITH, | R.H. AND K.W., F.R. AND L.S., PRESIDENT OF THE DEVON AND CORNWALL NAT. HIST. SOCIETY, &c. &c. VOL. I. ILLUSTRATED BY THIRTY-THREE COLOURED PLATES, WITH PORTRAIT AND MEMOIR OF PALLAS., EDINBURGH: W. H. LIZARS, 3, ST. JAMES’ SQUARE; S. HIGHLEY, 32, FLEET STREET, LONDON ; AND W. CURRY, JUN. AND CO. DUBLIN. 1839. ADVERTISEMENT FROM THE PUBLISHER. oy We have much satisfaction in fulfilling the assur- ance, given in our last advertisement, that many volumes were in an advanced state of progress, and would follow each other in as rapid succession as attention to the execution of the various depart- ments would allow; and we have now the pleasure to present to our friends and the Public the first portion of the NATURAL History OF THE Doe, written by Cotone, C. HAMILTON SmirH, a well- known and talented Zoologist, and one whom we may in future hope to rank as an able coadjutor in our work. This part contains the description of the principal wild races, allied to, and from which it is supposed most of our domestic breeds of Dogs have sprung; while the second part, com- pleting their history, and illustrating all those ani- mals which have been cultivated from them for the use or amusement of man, is so far advanced, that x ADVERTISEMENT. we are enabled confidently to promise it within the ` usual time. The Volume which will succeed those above mentioned, and which we hope to publish before Christmas, will be that devoted to the “ Natural History of Bees,” in which the extraordinary in- stincts of the Honey Bee will form the chief object. The economical management will, however, also be treated of; and a sketch of the history of the foreign forms which are allied to this interesting group of insects, will be added. These will form the subjects which will occupy the volumes to be given within the present year ; and it will be seen that the support which the Public has so liberally afforded to the “ LIBRARY,” has enabled us to receive assistance from Naturalists who beara high rank in their respective walks of science, The names of SELBY, Swainson, HAMILTON SMITH, HAMILTON, DUNBAR, Duncan, and Mac- GILLIVRAY, already stand as our co-operators, and the volumes for the coming year promise to increase our list with many able companions, 3, St. James’ Square, 1839. CONTENTS THE FIRST VOLUME MEMOIR oF PALLAS Chronological List of some of his Works INTRODUCTION THE CANINE FAMILY IN GENERAL The Diurnal Canide k Sub-genus I. Chaon.—Section n pad The Wolves : The Common Wolf. Lupus vulgaris. Plate I. . The Black Wolf. Lupus lycaon. Plate II. The American Wolves The Dusky Wolf. Lupus nubilus. Plate III. Wolf of Southern States, North America Lupus Mexicanus. Plate IV. Section II. Lyciscus.—The Lyciscan Dogs North American Prairie Wolf. Lyciscus latrans, Plate V. x CONTENTS. The Caygotte of Mexico, Lyciscus cagottis, Plate VI. . Section ITI. Chryseus.—The Red Dogs The True Dhole, Chryseus scylax, Plate VII. Dhole of Ceylon, Chryseus Ceylonicus, “Plate VIII. The Pariah Dog. Chryseus pahariah | Sumatran Chryszeus, ` Chryseus Sumatrensis, Plate IX. | The New Holland Dingo. \ Ohrysæus Australie, Plate X. Chryseus Javanicus, | Canis Javanicus Š : Section IV. Thous.—The Thoa Wild Dogs Thous Anthus. Canis Anthus The Thous of Nubia. Thous variegatus. Plate XI. The Yenlee, or Pied Thous. Thous mesomelas. Plate XII. Senegal Thous, Thous Senegalensis. Plate XIII, Thous Tokla è Wild Dog of Natolia. Thous acmon. Plate XIV, Section V. Sacalius.—The Jackals The Common Jackal. Sacalius aureus. Plate XV. The Barbary Jackal. Sacalius Barbarus Sacalius Procyonoides, Canis procyonoides x Section VI. Cynalopex 3 Corsac Dag-Fox. Cynalopex corsac, Plate XVI, ° e _ CONTENTS. The Kokree. ; Cynalopex kokree . Fulvous-tailed Dog-Fox. Cynalopex chrysurus The Pale Dog-Fox. Cynalopex pallidus. Plate XVII. The Isatis. Cynalopex insectivorus 4 ` The Turkish Dog-Fox. Cynalopex Turcicus. Plate XVIII. Section VII. Megalotis——The Fennecs or arden The Anubis Zerda. Megalotis famelicus A Caama Fennec. 3 Megalotis caama. Plate XIX. . Fennec of Bruce. Megalotis zerda. Plate XX. 7 Section VIIL Chrysocyon.—The Aguara Wawes The Maned Aguara. Chrysocyon jubatus. Plate XXI. . Section IX. Dusicyon.—The Aguara Dogs Hoary Aguara Dog. Dusicyon canescens. Plate XXII. . Falkland Island Aguara Dog. Dusicyon Antarticus. Plate XXIII. Aguara Dog of the Woods. Dusicyon sylvestris. Plate XXIV. The Crabodage, or Surinam Aguara Dog. Dusicyon sylvestris. Plate XXV. Dun-footed Aguara Dog. i Dusicyon fulvipes. Plate XXVI. . Section X. Cerdocyon.—The Aguara Foxes White-barred Aguara Fox. Cerdocyon mesoleucus. Plate XXVII. Guaraxa Aguara Fox. Cerdocyon guaraxa, Plate XXVIII. w xiv CONTENTS. Crabodago Aguara Fox. Cerdocyon Azare. - Plate XXIX, Magellanic Aguara Fox, Cerdocyon Magellanicus. Plate XXX. Skulls of Hyæna, Fox, and Newfoundland Dog, Plate XXXI. Portrait of PALLAS Vignette. Title-page ee In all Thirty-three Plates in this Volume. op < Ei | < am Eu © aa jemi © = eal = MEMOIR OF PALLAS. Juvat integros accedere fontes Atque haurire, juvatque novos decerpere flores. Lucreis de Nat. Rer. bib. iv. Parras, the illustrious subject of the following Memoir, was probably the most eminent scientific Naturalist whose name adorns the latter half of the eighteenth century. His discoveries, in almost every department of Natural History, are perhaps more frequently quoted than those of any other author ; and hence the interest that is very generally and naturally felt respecting the particulars of hig life and history. No detailed and regular account, how- ever, so far as we know, has hitherto enriched the annals of biography ; and though the work might be difficult, we cannot entertain a doubt that its accom- plishment would amply repay the best exertions of any one competent to the task. VOL. L B \ 18 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. “ When a man,” says Baron Cuvier, “ devotes his whole life to science; when entirely occupied in making observations and in recording them, the only suspension in his researches being that required for their publication, it will easily be imagined that his life will not exhibit many striking incidents, and will be read accurately only in the analysis of his works. But if, besides, working only for men of science of his own grade, he despises all orna- ment ; if to assist him in the accumulation of facts, he always clothes them in the simplest and most meagre expressions, and leaves to others the humble merit of deducing the results, then this analysis be- comes almost impossible; and to make known his works, it is necessary that we should copy them. These remarks apply to Pallas. Removed in youth from his family and country, a third of his life was spent in the desert, and the rest in his study ; and in both these situations he made an immense number of observations, and wrote a great many memoirs and volumes. All his writings dry, and not composed with the object of pleasing, are yet filled with important and novel remarks : they have elevated the name of the author to the first rank among naturalists, who peruse them without ceas- ing, and quote them in every page; they are studied and consulted with pleasure by the historian and the geographer, by those who study the philosophy of language, and the moral condition of the different races of mankind. Butit is precisely this multitude of his labours, and their diversity, which compels MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 19 Me to make his Eloge a kind of ‘ table of contents; for which I must crave the indulgence of my audi- tory.” * This eminent naturalist, PETER Stmon PALLAS, was born in Berlin, September 22d, in the year 1741. His father, Simon Pallas, a native of Jo- hannisburg in Prussia, was surgeon-major in the regiment of Doenhof, and in 1741 was appointed professor of surgery at Berlin, and chief surgeon of the public hospital of that city. His mother, Susan eonard, was of French extraction, bemg born in the colony of French emigrants which had for some time been established in the Prussian metropolis. Young Pallas received the early part of his edu- cation at home from private tutors, and made most Satisfactory progress in his studies. His father, who intended him to follow his own profession, entertained the judicious purpose of familiarizing him, when still almost a child, with many lan- guages; and the boy made such proficiency, that he could soon write almost equally well in Latin, and French, in English and German. The manifold advantages accruing from this accomplishment, usu- ally so easily acquired in youth, were very apparent * See Recueil des Eloges Hist. par M. le Chev. Cuvier, t. ii. 109.—Of course we shall freely avail ourselves of this masterly eloge, so far as it goes. The Baron states he was much as- sisted by L’Essai Biographique sur Pallas, which was read by M. Rudolphi to the Academy of Berlin in 1812. This we have not seen. 20 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. in the subsequent history of Pallas; and its great utility to every student of science is so manifest, that it is matter of surprise the example is not more generally, not to say universally, followed. This acquirement was so little troublesome to the learner, that he still kept ahead of his youthful comrades in his other studies ; and not content with what was taught by his masters, he employed his leisure hours in the study of natural history ; and with such suc- éess, that at the age of fifteen, he sketched ingenious classifications of several groups of animals. It was in his fifteenth year that Pallas entered seriously upon his professional pursuits, and com- menced attendance on lectures upon anatomy and physiology, botany and medicine, under Professors Meckel, Sproegel, Rolof, and his father. So apt a scholar was he in these several branches of science, that in the beginning of the year 1758 we find him, according to the account he gave to Mr Coxe, ena- bled to read a course of public lectures on anatomy.* Yet although thus occupied in his professional la- bours, he found leisure to prosecute, under the special auspices of one of his preceptors, Martin Schoeling, the study of entomology and other branches of zoology. In the autumn of the same year he re- paired to the university of Halle, where he attended the lectures of the celebrated Segner on mathematics * See Coxe’s Travels, and Rees’s Cyclopedia, under “ Pal- las ; where may be found by far the best sketch of his history we have seen in the English tongue. MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 21 and physics, and also improved his acquaintance with mineralogy, in the environs of that city. In the spring of the year 1759 young Pallas removed to Gottingen; and though prevented by a long and dangerous illness from prosecuting his Studies with his wonted ardour, yet he reaped much benefit from the instructions of the physicians Roe- derer and Voegel, and improved his general know- ledge by diligently availing himself of the many Tare books belonging to the library. During his resi- dence at this celebrated university, he made numer- ous experiments on poisons and the effects of the Most potent medicines, applied himself to the dis- section of animals, and made many observations on Worms. On the last named subject, he at this time composed an ingenious treatise under the title “ De infestis Viventibus intra viventia,’* in which he seems to have taken great pains to discriminate these noxi- ous animals, and to have described many of them with singular accuracy. In July 1760 Pallas was attracted to the univer- sity of Leyden by the fame of its celebrated profes- Sors, Albinus, Gaubius, and Muschenbroeck ; and by them he was noticed as a young man of pro- Mising genius and indefatigable application. In December he took his Doctor's degree, and distin- guished himself by his inaugural dissertation, in Which he defended by new experiments, the treatise * See list in the Appendix, where we have given as com- plete an enumeration as we could of the titles of his works, chronologically arranged. an 22 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. mentioned above as composed at Gottingen. This Thesis seems to have been his first work, and was published in the nineteenth year of his age. At this epoch, the possession of numerous colo- nies all over the world, as well as the first and longest established rank in commerce, had accumu- lated a vast number of rare natural productions in the several museums of Holland, and natural history itself was receiving a new impetus, from the taste and attention bestowed upon it by the gifted mother of the last Stadtholder. We cannot be surprised, therefore, that during his stay at Leyden, this science should have become the predominant pas- sion of our enthusiastic student, who employed all the time he could spare from his professional pur- suits in visiting the public and private museums, and in carefully noting what was most worthy of attention. Having visited the principal cities of Holland, Pallas directed his course to London, where he arrived in July 1761 ; the ostensible ‘objects of his journey to England being to improve his know- ledge of medicine and surgery, and to inspect the hospitals. He was now, however, so much absorbed in his contemplations on zoology, that he neglected. every other pursuit, and gave himself up entirely to his favourite branch of science. At this juncture his zeal was so ardent, that after having passed the day in curiously examining the various collections of natural history, and perusing the principal works he could procure on the subject, he would frequently MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 23 employ the greater part of the night, and occa- sionally even whole nights together, in devouring some new publication, which either awakened his curiosity, or which bore upon his more immediate researches. With the view of extending his infor- mation, he took several journeys to the sea-coasts, and more especially into Sussex. Being at length summoned by his father to return. home, the young naturalist quitted London with regret, in the latter end of April 1762, and repaired to Harwich, in order to embark for Holland. Here he was detained by contrary winds; and while most men would have regarded this circumstance as 4 grievous annoyance, he turned it to profit, and re- joiced in the opportunity it afforded of examining the coasts and shores, and collecting a variety of marine productions. On the 13th of May he landed in Holland, and passing through the Hague, Ley- den, and Amsterdam, arrived in Berlin on the 12th of June. A Previous to commencing the practice of his pro- fession, his father sent him to Hanover, for the pur- pose of procuring the post of surgeon in the allied army ; but as peace was soon concluded, he returned to his native city, where he spent a year, employed chiefly in preparing materials for a “ Fauna Insec- torum” or “ A Description of the Insects in the March of Brandenburg.” Animated by his predilection for natural history, and encouraged by the favour and patronage of the great Gaubius, he at length prevailed with his father G 24 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. to allow him to go and settle in Holland. Thither accordingly he went, and took up his abode at the Hague. His reputation at this time was so well established, that he was the same year, 1764, at the age of 23, elected Fellow of the Royal Society of London, and in the following year, Member of the Academie des Curieux de la Nature, to both of which Societies he had previously sent interesting and mgenious papers, The intimacy which Pallas now contracted with the celebrated naturalists in Holland, and particu- larly with those of the Hague, who had commenced the formation of a literary society,—the free access he had to the great museum of the Prince of Orange, and other valuable cabinets, —the systematic cata- logues of these collections which he drew up, and several of which he published,—contributed much to advance his knowledge of the productions of nature in the various quarters of the globe, and to the collection of those materials which gave birth to the many works on zoology which have deservedly distinguished their author as the first naturalist of his time. One of the earliest treatises which ren- dered him conspicuous was his Elinchus Zoophyto- rum, or “ Tabular View of Zoophytes.” This could not be considered but as an extraor- dinary production for the time, proceeding from the pen of any one, and was still more remarkable as coming from so young a man. Haller characterizes it as Princeps in hae classe opus, que limites utrius- que regi confundit, and adds, totam classem per MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 95 sua genera, accurate definit, speciesque.* Tn its com- position he availed himself of all that had been done before him, including the labours of Marsigli and Roemphius, of Peysonelli and Trembley, and _ especially of the more recent discoveries of Linneus and Ellis. In the volume we find an Elinchus Auctorum ad Historiam Zoophytorum Spectantium. We thence perceive that he consulted no fewer than a hundred treatises on the subject, and in the rich collections of Holland he found treasures more varied and extensive than probably had ever fallen under the examination of any other individual. All these he handled as a master. He divided those he considered as true zoophytes into 15 genera and 250 species ; and added three genera which he considered doubtful, genera ambigua, comprehending 22 species. The former included, Ist, the Hydra ; 2, Eschara; 3, Cellularia; 4, Tabularia ; 5, Brachi- onus; 6, Sertularia; 7, Gorgonie ; 8, Antipathes ; ` 9, Isis; 10, Millepora; 11, Madrepora; 12, Tubi- pora; 13, Alcyonium; 14, Pennatula; and 15, Spongia. The three ambiguous genera are Tenia, Volvoces, and Corallina. His definition of sponge is animal ambiguum, crescens, torpidisimum ; and he distinctly says that corals are to be referred to the class of vegetables. But we must not enter upon any thing like criticism: Cuvier remarks of the work generally, “ that the clearness of his de- scription, and the care with which he refers the * Bibl. Bot. t. ii. 566. pe ae 26 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. synonyms of authors to his species, was. quite remarkable for an author of twenty-five years of age, and his ‘ Introduction’ was still more so. With regard to corals, he pointed out the errors of the prevailing Opinion, as if they had been a mere hive so to speak, to the polypes. He demonstrated that their trunk itself is living; that it is a kind of ani- mal tree, with its branches and heads; a composite animal, the stony portion of which is nothing more than the common skeleton which grows, as do the animals, but is not fabricated by them. Linnzus was the first who energetically supported these bold views, which are now adopted by every one.” Pallas’s ideas concerning true corals excited the attention of our countryman Ellis, who wrote an admirable essay in reply, which silenced, if it did not convince, his able adversary. It is somewhat curious, notwithstanding the advance which has been made in this department,* how truly it might still be remarked concerning these doubtful genera, the sponges and coralines, in the very words of our author, “ At verum Jabricam eruere, hoc opus, hic labor est.” The history of our rising zoologist, not to s Zoology itself, was this same year (1766) distin- guished by another and scarcely less production of his pen. In this goodly quarto, of more than two hundred pages, adored with four- ay remarkable * See Dr. Johnston’s Paper on the Nat, Hist. of British Zoophytes, in the Magazine of Zoology and Botany, p. 229; and his History of British Zoophytes, 1838, vol. i. MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 27 teen plates, as its title Miscellania Zoologica would lead us to infer, a great variety of subjects are brought under review. The author particularly describes several species of vertebral animals new to science, and a number of invertebral, not wholly disregarding either insects or plants. He was en- gaged, as he states in his preface, for several years in its preparation, and was induced to undertake it from the great attentions and facilities he had experienced in Holland.* Though we must not attempt any thing like an extended analysis, yet we cannot pass by this inte- resting volume without a few remarks. It contains a minute description of a species of bat, concerning which family Pallas remarks, much was required at the time to perfect the history. From its resem- blance to the shrew-mouse, he named it Vespertilio soricinus ; it is the Glosophaga soricina of systema- tists, G. of Pallas of Desmarest. It was not more than two inches in length, but was in many re- spects remarkable. It had been procured both in Surinam and the West Indies; and yet, he remarks, its natural history was quite a blank. We need scarcely remark, that our author, both with pen and pencil, amply supplied this deficiency. Though many species are now included in the genus, yet no * In Belgium triennio fere abhinc advena summa humani- tate a curiosis et Scientiæ patronis excerptus fui. . Ditissima abinde, quibus Batavee urbes gloriantur, rerum naturalium musea in hoe genus studii ardentissimo mihi liberaliter patu- erunt, &c. 28 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. one has received a more detailed description. . The next animal of which he gives an account is the great flying-squirrel from the islands of the Indian archipelago, by him denominated Sciurus petaurista, from the enormous leaps it takes by means of its wing-like membranes. It is the Pteromys petaurista of our systems. After briefly alluding to the dimi- nutive species of Northern Asia and America, which had long been known, and mentioning the very little that had been recorded of the animal before us, by Valentyn and in the Lettres Lidifiantes, he states, that, he drew his description from three spe- cimens in the respective museums of Leyden, the Hague, and the Prince of Orange. These gave the size equal to that of a small rabbit, about eighteen inches long. The description is accompanied by an excellent representation, which is still copied into some of our most popular works. Another animal, concerning which he states that naturalists had preserved the most profound silence, and which he describes at length, supplying good figures, is his Cavia Capensis (Cabiai). He is at pains to distinguish it from the water-hog (Lydrocheerus), and the Guinea-pig (Cabaya) of South America ; he also distinguished it from the agouti and the aperia and paca of Marcgraf, &c. This animal is now arranged as the Hyraz of Hermann, the Duman of Buffon, Desmarest, &c.; it is the Isracl of the Arabs of Mount Lebanon, and is generally regarded as the Coney of the Sacred Scriptures, We shall next allude to his Apis Zithiopicus, which at pre- MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 29 Sent stands as the Phasiochewrus Africanus of syste- matists, “I shall now,” says he, “ describe a new Species of boar which is peculiar to Africa, and possesses a very peculiar form ;” a form now gene- tally known, which consists principally in several great excrescencés about the snout, and which has procured for it the popular name of the marked or wart-hog. It was by mere inference that he con- cluded that it was the same as the boar of Mada- gascar (Sus larvatus). His words are, “I scarcely doubt that the African boar seen by Adanson. was this species, and hence we may conclude it is found in the whole warmer regions of Africa, at least as far as the Niger. It is probably, too, an inhabitant of Madagascar, according to the testimony of Flac- court; hence I conclude I may apply to it the name Aper Aithiopicus. This name is probably unfortu- nate, as it would appear that the characters of that Species described by Ruppel, A. Æliani, as existing in that country, are sufficiently distinct.”* Passing by the short paper in which he maintains that the Opossum and ant-eaters are not confined to the New World, we shall draw our account of the quadru- peds mentioned in this volume to a close, by stating that there is a minute description first given in this work, not in the Spicilegia Zoologica, as it is fre- quently stated, of the Grim, or Antilope grimmie : this is preceded by a monograph of the antelopes, in which they are divided into three genera and Seventeen species. * See the Naturalist’s Library, Mammalia, vol. v. p. 219, 30 MEMOIR OF PALLAS, We must not stay to make any remark on his de- scription of a crane, his Grus crepitans, the golden- breasted trumpeter of Linnzeus ; neither shall we say a word on the insects he describes, species of Onisci, of a marine Acarus, and of the Cicada; nor shall we dwell upon several zoophytes, actinia, and pen- natule, which he again introduced to notice; but shall add, that to more than any, or than to the whole of the foregoing, inclusive, he directed his attention to the great class Mollusca, which our readers will remember immediately succeeds the vertebral animals, and precedes insects ; and includes shell-fish, worms, &c. We repeat, that more than one half of the Miscellanea is devoted to this most interesting and difficult class; and with a degree of acuteness and success which was scarcely inferior to that which attended his researches regarding zoophytes. We dwell the longer on this volume, because we conceive that, from a variety of causes, it has not taken that rank in general estimation to which it is fully entitled. One reason of this appears to have been, that the author almost immediately afterwards brought out a second edition, we may call it, of that part of the volume which treated. of quadrupeds in his Spicilegia Zoologica, although much is omitted in this latter which appears in the former: and ano- ther and equally influential cause is to be found in the difficulty of the investigation connected with the mollusca. As our space does not allow us to dilate, we shall simply state, that he dwells at considerable MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 31 length on the Anomiæ, Serpulæ, the Nereides and Aphrodite, the Echiuree, Lumbrici, and Hydatids. Instead, however, of passing any opinion of our own, we will here adduce the sentiments of Cuvier :— “ What would have excited the liveliest astonish- ment, if the public at the time had been in a condi- tion to appreciate it, was the sudden light which Pallas threw on those classes of the animal economy which were least known, and which had long been huddled together under the common appellation of worms. Not permitting himself to be imposed upon by the errors of Linnaeus, any more than by those of Buffon, he demonstrated that the presence or absence of a shell could not furnish a satisfactory basis for their arrangement, and that the whole ana- logy of their structure should be regarded; that in this respect the ascidia are properly analogous to bivalve shells, * * *, that the univalves are more nearly connected with snails, and that the Aphro- dite, whose anatomical structure he beautifully elucidated, should be approximated to the nereides, serpulæ, and other articulated worms, whether they have shells or not. Assuredly,” he continues, “ the naturalist whose glance was so piercing, could have dispelled the chaos which enveloped those inverte- bral animals, if he had continued to prosecute his investigations; but at the time he published his views, they were not quite matured. Those errors which a little trouble would have speedily corrected, probably contributed to delay a necessary revolution of opinion till a subsequent period ; and we here 3, Oe ‘MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 32 see how often progress is arrested by the slightest circumstance. The most astonishing thing of all is, that he himself neglected to procecute these beauti- ful observations.” To Cuvier’s remarks on this portion of the trea- tise, we must not omit to add his general estimate of this too much neglected work. “ We cannot,” he observes, “ behold, without astonishment, so young an author unite the merits of the two great masters who then divided between them the empire of science. He boldly took for his models the great French naturalist and his assistant Daubenton ; he charged himself with their double work, and with- - out allowing himself to be dazzled by their authority, he conjoined, with the profound sagacity of the one and the patient accuracy of the other, those precise and methodical views which were too much ne- glected by them both.” After this brief critique and analysis, both of that part of the work which treats of the mollusca, and of the vertebrata, no one we apprehend can doubt that this was a production of the rarest merit; which, appearing within a few months after the Elinchus Zoophytorum, could not fail most deservedly to raise the character of the author to the very first rank among naturalists. In the dedication prefixed to this work, the author laid before the Prince of Orange a plan for a voyage to the Cape of Good Hope and to the other Dutch | settlements in the East Indies, and which, impelled by his wonted ardour for scientific knowledge, he MEMOIR OF PALLAS. € | 33 offered to undertake and superintend. This project was strongly recommended by Gaubius and ap- proved of by the Prince, but was prevented from being carried into execution by the author’s father, who not only refused his consent to his taking such a distant expedition, but even recalled him to Ber- lin. In obedience to his father’s wish, but with the greatest reluctance, he quitted Holland in Novem- ber 1766. On his return to his native city, his only consola- tion for his separation from his friends in Holland, and in having lost so many opportunities of improv- ino himself, consisted in arranging the vast stock of materials he had collected, and the observations he was unceasingly making, and presenting them to the public. This he did in that work so well known and so often quoted, the Spicilegia Zoologica, which | was somewhat on the plan of our modern periodi- cals, coming out in successive numbers, though not rigorously restricted as to time. It extended to thirty or forty quarto pages letterpress, and was illustrated with excellent engravings, both of the entire ani- mals, and of the parts of their structure which were insisted upon. Four numbers only were at this time brought out under his own eye at Berlin; they appeared, however, in less than six months, thus supplying new proof of the unwearied energy of the author. As we have already remarked, this volume might be regarded as an improved edition of a part of the Miscellania. The first number is occupied wholly VOL, 1. 3 34 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. with what we have designated a Monograph of Antelopes. Here the general description is some- what altered, and sixteen species are enumerated ; and to the minute account of the Grim, that of the Cervicapra is added; the second fasciculus contains the Apis iithiopicus and the coney or cavia, both of which are somewhat further illustrated; the third is wholly occupied with bats, and another new species is added, the Cephalotes of Geoffrey; and the last treats of the crane before mentioned, and the crested and mitred guinea-fowls of Africa. But the work, together with Pallas’s residence in Berlin, were bronght to a sudden close, by his being invited by the Berar Catherine II. to accept of the professorship of natural history in the Imperial Academy of Sciences at St Petersburg; and although in this instance his father and other relatives again refused their assent, yet his own ardent zeal for his favourite science induced him, without a moment’s hesitation, to accede to the invitation, and to hasten his departure for a conntry where his curiosity was so likely to be amply gratified. He accordingly quitted his native land in June 1767, and Seine in Petersburg on the 10th of August. His stay, however, was likewise very short in this capital, as his services were almost immediately put in requisition in connexion with an important and extended scientific expedition. The reigning Empress was excited to promote this measure as somewhat curious circumstance. At the time of the transit of Venus over the sun’s disk in 1763, the MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 35 French government despatched the Abbé Chappe T Auteroche to Tobolsk to make the required ob- servations; and he, on his return, published an account of what he had seen, the sarcastic tone of Which so irritated the Empress that she took the trouble, it is stated, to refute him herself. On this account, too, she was unwilling that foreigners should again undertake the examination of a similar transit of Venus in 1769, and she therefore appointed astronomers of the Imperial Academy to undertake it, conjoining with them naturalists also, who were to examine and report on the face of the country. To this latter project she was the more excited, from her recently having made a progress down the Volga and through the interior provinces of European Russia. She had then become aware of the great deficiencies of the existing topographical and geo- graphical information, and saw the advantages which would accrue from deputing learned and skilful men to visit the distant provinces of her extensive dominions, with a view to enlarge the boundaries of science and extend a knowledge of the useful arts among the natives. On being made acquainted with these plans, Pallas immediately offered to accompany the expedition, and was eagerly accepted. In consequence of the orders of the sovereign, the Academy amongst others named Messrs Pallas, Lépéchen, Gmelin the nephew, Gul- denstrædt, and Georgi as members of the commis- sion, which upon the whole consisted of these five naturalists and seven astronomers and mathemati- 36 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. cians, and of a great number of assistants, whose services were to be devoted to the several objects of pursuit. To Pallas was entrusted the preparing the general instructions for the naturalists, and he was gratified with the choice of his more immediate associates: on him too was conferred, at his own request, the conduct of the expedition to the east of the Volga, and towards the extreme parts of Siberia. Pallas spent the winter previous to his departure in Petersburg; and in the midst of his innumerable preparations, found time for a multitude of scientific labours. He drew up a systematic catalogue of the animals in the museum of the Academy of Sciences ; he arranged the celebrated collection of Professor Breyn of Dantzic, which has been lately purchased by Prince Orlof; and prepared for the press six additional numbers of the Spicilegia Zoologica, which were printed at Berlin, during his absence, under the direction of Dr Martin.* The work, however, which produced the liveliest sensations at the time, was a memoir which was read to the Imperial Aca- demy concerning the bones of the great quadrupeds which are so often found in Siberia ; among which he recognized those of the elephant, rhinoceros, buf- falo, and many others belonging only to intertropical countries, and in quantities which are quite enor- mous. ‘These statements raised the attention of all the naturalists in Europe to these astonishing ap- * These we have not been able to procure. MEMOIR OF PALLAS. oF pearances, and excited an interest which has since yielded an abundant harvest.* Our Naturalist set off from Petersburg in June 1768, and having passed through Moscow, and crossed the plains of European Russia, spent the winter at Simbirsk on the Volga, in the midst of those Tartars who were originally masters in Russia, but who have since devoted themselves to agricul- ture, He then moved forwards to Orenburg, which is the great rendezvous for the migratory hordes who wander over the salt deserts on the north of the Caspian, and who conduct the caravans which convey the commerce of India across the deserts. Descending the river Jatk, or Oural, he stopped at Gurief, a small Russian fortress upon the Caspian, and with much care examined that great sea, which formerly, according to him, was much more exten- sive, and whose ancient shores may still be recog- nized at a great distance from its present waters towards the north and west. Returning through the province of Orenburg, he spent the second win- ter at Ufa. The year 1770 was employed in visiting the two slopes of the Oural mountains, and the numerous iron mines which have been worked among them ; and which have supplied to- many families, in a few generations, fortunes equal to those of European princes. In December he reached Tobolsk, the capital of Siberia, and there wintered. In 1771 he * Nov. Com. Petro. t. xiii. 38 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. crossed the Altaisk mountains, followed the course of the Irtish as far as Kolivan, where he inspected the celebrated silver mines, and finally arrived at Krasnoyarsk, a town upon the Enissey. In spring 1772 he set off for another district which is still richer in mines, and which belongs to the crown, on the northern slope of the Altay mountains, the great chain which extends from east to west, and which, by obstructing the south wind, imposes on Siberia a climate much more rigorous than its lati- tude indicates. After advancing still farther east- ward, he crossed the great lake Baikal, and traversed that mountainous country known under the name of Daourie, which extends to the frontiers of China. He here experienced so great a cold, that he wit- nessed. the natural freezing of mercury,—which phenomena he minutely described. It was in these regions that he for the first time began to witness a complete difference from every thing seen in Europe : the plants assumed new forms, and the animals, of kinds altogether unknown to us, climbed the rocks, having wandered from the immense deserts of cen- tral Asia. After having met with a great many hordes who were half savage, he here at length discovered a civilized nation, but one whose civi- lization is very different from any thing seen in ‘Europe; and he could not prevent himself from con- eluding that the Chinese were a race distinct from the others, so far back at least as the last great catas- trophe of the globe, and which in its developement had followed a course alike isolated and peculiar. > MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 39 Retracing his steps, after having passed a second winter at Krasnoyarsk, our traveller returned in 1770 to the Oural and the Caspian, visited Astra- kan, and there studied the manners and characters of the Indians, Buchares, and other inhabitants of southern and central Asia who unite in composing © the extraordinary population of that city. He then resorted to the Caucasus, the great nursery of the white races of mankind,—as the mountains of Da- aurie appear to be of those of a yellow hue. He again passed the winter at the foot of that range which separates the Volga from the Tanais, and finally returned to Petersburg on the 30th of July, after an absence of six years. During the time that he himself pursued the principal route, he was in the habit of despatching several of his young asso- ciates in different directions to investigate whatever was important, and then carefully availed himself of their observations. Five goodly quartos, with another of plates,* were the immediate result of these travels. We say immediate, because their publication did not wait the return of the author, but, on the contrary, according to the plan prescribed by Count Orlof, president of the Academy, the MSS. were sent every year to Petersburg, and were published as soon as they arrived. In consequence probably of this plan, very different estimates have been made of * See Appendix. Voyages de Pallas Traduits de L’Alle- mand, Paris, 1788. 40 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. > the character of these “ Travels ;” and whilst some have conferred on them the highest eulogiums, more perhaps have bestowed only limited praise. As exhibiting the sentiments of the former of these classes, we shall adduce only the testimony of the illustrious De Saussure, a no less competent than an unexceptionable judge. “ The accounts,” he says, « of these long and painful journeys comprehend all that can interest the naturalist and the statesman ; and they are perhaps the grandest and most beauti- ful specimen of this kind of work which we possess.” With this we connect the criticism of the judicious Cuvier :—“ It may easily be supposed that thus working in haste, and in these solitudes, without books and every means of reference, the author must necessarily have fallen inte some errors, insisted upon familiar matters as if they were unknown, and been guilty of repetition. It must moreover be conceded, that he might have infused more life into his narrative, and given greater prominency to the more interesting objects which he met. It can scarcely be questioned that the long and dry enu- meration of mines and forges, and the often repeated catalogues of common plants and birds he encoun- tered, do not supply agreeable reading. He does not carry his readers along with him, nor, like more fortunate authors, pourtray the features of Nature’s grandeur to the eye, nor the singular peculiarities of those who passed under his review. At the same time, however, it must be allowed, that the circum- stances in which he wrote were any thing but MEMOIR OF PALLAS. AY favourable. Long winters of six months duration, spent in a miserable cabin, with black bread and brandy for his only luxuries, at a temperature which froze mercury, and”a summer's heat almost imsup- portable the few weeks it lasted; with his time fully occupied in clambering rocks and fording mo- Tasses, in pioneering a road through thick forests, amidst myriads of insects which darken the air, and almost devour you, amongst people who bear the stamp of all the miseries of their country, generally disgustingly dirty, often frightfully ugly, and always dreadfully stupid,—all this could not but damp the liveliest imagination.” In encountering these very different estimates of our authors most voluminous work, it will be well to consider the real aim he had in view. He under- took a journey over regions which were almost wholly unknown. to the civilized world; he did so at the country’s expense, and under the most favour- able and illustrious auspices ; expectation was in the last degree excited, and curiosity was impatient for gratification, so that each volume was published as it was filled. Under these circumstances the work could only be considered as a journal or itinerary, and it should never be regarded in any other light. This was unquestionably the light in which the author himself regarded it, as it was the view taken by his contemporaries, and hence the high mead of praise they so invariably bestowed upon it. As the author himself remarks, “ the encomiums which many learned men have bestowed on this treatise 49 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. have been most flattering to me; and I can affirm that the only knowledge I have of them is from their works and general reputation. I regard their suf- frage as a most ample reward for all my fatigue and suffering, though at the expense of my health; and I am content, because I have fulfilled the wishes of my sovereign and the Academy.” His own apology, and his plan, must we think be satisfactory to every one: “ I shall mention only what appears to me the most necessary, and I shall do it as laconically as I can. I have bestowed the most scrupulous care on all my observations; in my estimation, truth is the first requisite of the traveller, and it has been my principal object in my own remarks, and in all the observations of others which I repeat. If I had had time at my disposal, and a library at my back, my work would have been more beautiful and richer. I may possibly have inserted some remarks which will be regarded imperfections by many, but I owe them to a class of readers who find them agreeable: I have only had two months to prepare this great volume, and I therefore anticipate indul- gence.” Probably the most satisfactory method of enabling the reader to form his own estimate of the style and merit of this work will be to present him with some extracts; and though these must be necessarily few and short, yet from the pervading uniformity, they may prove sufficient. “ This day the ice broke up on the Samara (a tributary of the Volga); on the 9th of April the waters began to rise, and on the llth MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 43 the Volga was so far cleared that two-thirds of its bed was free of ice. The north wind which pre- vailed on the 13th very much hastened the descent of the ice, till the 15th, when it was entirely free. It rarely happens that the opening of the river is later than this date, and sometimes it is accom- plished in March. The weather was beautiful and the country was covered with flowers by the middle — of April. The willow and hazel-nut began to flower on the 14th; between the 15th and the 17th, all the cleared spots were strewed with patentilla and spring Adonis, and the star of Bethlehem. Violets and anemonies surrounded the shrubs in full blos- som. The birch and service now put on their summer. garb, as did most other shrubs by the 20th. The almond-tree and the wild cherry, the tulip and scented iris, blue and purple, yellow and white valerians, astragulus, and very many other flowers were in blossom before the 20th of April, and formed an agreeable carpet upon all the hills. The wild apple and the arbutus, which is very common about Samara, were in flower by the end of the month, as well as the fruit-yielding robinia and the prickly cysticus, which generally affects all the moist parts of the moors. “ Birds of passage had made their appearance at an earlier date. By the 19th of March we noticed flocks of geese and wild swans ; by the 25th, quan- tities of all sorts of ducks appeared in the free parts of the river; lapwings did not show themselves till the 26th, but before the end of March all the aqua- € 44 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. tic birds had arrived. I have remarked, that not only in these countries, but generally throughout Europe, those birds of passage come from the west and north-west; whilst it is also true that the bit- tern and the stork, of which there is a species here quite white, as also cranes and other land-birds, come about the same time from the south. The common and ash-coloured crow appeared about the middle of March, and consequently were the first visitors of that class: the wood-pigeon, the starling, and the alpine lark appeared only towards the end of the month ; they come in flocks, and are as com- mon as sparrows Among the latest visitants was the beautiful hoopoe, and it too was in great num- bers. Insects appeared at the same time as the flowers. Notwithstanding the extraordinary heat, and the great number of insects, swallows did not arrive before the 16th of April, though they pre- ceded the wasp. This is a proof that swallows are really birds of passage ; because, if not, they should have arrived at least at the same time with the insects. The fable of swallows hybernating at the bottom of the streams, is unknown in Russia ; although there is not a country in the world where fishing is prosecuted with greater ardour, and where the net is so much employed, both in winter and spring.” —T. i. 224—227. One other specimen we shall supply. “It would be difficult to find a more delightful locality than the neighbourhood of Samara. Tt is rich in superb forests of birch and aspens, occasionally mixed with MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 45 firs, and varied by hills and rich meadows. Few countries more deserve to be peopled. It abounds in rich arable land and green valleys, and here are found in great numbers every variety of the elk and deer. These separate during the winter, in the woods and thickets which skirt the rivers and streams, as well as over the moors and mountains. There the elks browse upon the young shoots and bark of the aspen and poplar, which grow in great luxuriance: they here also find excellent shelter in summer, and abundant nourishment upon the moun- tains and heaths. The roe-buck thrives equally well, as the wind sweeps the snow from the heights, and they feed on the herbs thus exposed. The Cossacks every year kill a great number of these animals. They pursue them chiefly in March: at this period the power of the sun melts the surface of the snow, and the evening cold produces a layer of ice, which enables them to move over it with wooden shoes, whilst the poor animal sinks deep with its hard and sharp hoofs. They track their footsteps into the valleys where the snow is deep, and fire as soon as within gunshot; and the dogs, which can run won- derfully on the snowy crust, so azrest their flight, that the hunters approach and despatch them with their lances. The skins are greatly esteemed, and sell at a high price; they are beautiful, very light, and almost water-proof.”—T. i. 304—305. We mentioned in a former page that Pallas prepared the instructions for the guidance of the zoologists, and they were fully as ample as these 46 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. documents usually are. And now we may venture to add, that with scarcely an exception, there was not a single subject indicated, on which he did not bestow a most enlightened and unceasing attention, and accomplished all that could be desired, in a way that is alike calculated to excite wonder and admiration. The “ Travels” are filled with an im- finity of judicious and learned remarks, and present much information of the highest value to history generally, and to that of our race especially. Man, and still more the various tribes he encountered, receive a large share of attention; their natural dispositions and habits; their religions, supersti- tions, rites, and ceremonies; their diseases, and popular and peculiar remedies; along with their languages, in their various affinities and contrasts ; as also the important subject of antiquities, con- nected with architecture, sepulture, &c.; likewise their employments, whether in agriculture and hor- ticulture, including the rearing of cattle and horses, the management of forests and vineyards, the pro- duction of dye-stuffs, drugs, cotton, mulberries, silk-worms, bees, cochineal; or in arts and manu- factures, as of leather, pottery, potash, soda, sulphur, vitriol, ardent spirits, wines, &c.; not forgetting their fisheries, so requisite among those observing the superstitions of the Greek church; and their trade and commerce generally ;—these, and similar matters, obtain all due regard. Geology and mine- ralogy are scarcely second in his regards, and we might extract volumes on this subject alone which MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 47 could not be read but with the deepest interest. He descants largely on salt lakes and mines, on sulphur mines, lakes and rivers, on many of the rarer minerals, and very largely on mining, espe- cially of iron, copper, and silver. Some of our readers may remember that of those extraordinary bodies the metallic stones, one of the most famous has the name of Pallas attached to it, from his being the first who made it generally known. It was isolated on the surface, upon the top of a mountain, far from every appearance of any volcano or mining operation, and weighed 1600 pounds. The metal was quite maleable when cold, was cavernous, and studded with quartz. The Tartars declared it had fallen from heaven, and regarded it as sacred. The famous chemist Berzelivs has lately devoted his at- tention to the composition of many of these stones, which he divides into two species, and among others to that of Pallas.* Our authors minute and very interesting details, we must altogether omit. Tt is not because the author has given an inferior attention in these Travels to natural history that we notice it last, but for the very opposite reason: this was certainly to have been expected, and in all its departments there are never ending acute and most interesting statements. {n addition to all the im- formation in the body of the work, he subjoins at the end three supplements in Latin which contain a classical description of three hundred and ninety- * New Edin, Phil. Journ. vol. xxii. p- 1, 48 MEMOIR OF PALLAS, five quadrupeds, birds, reptiles, fishes, insects, worms, and plants which he had examined with care, and many of which were new, or previously imperfectly described. It was here was supplied the first description of an extinct rhinoceros which was found in December 1771, in the Vilui, a branch of the Lena, where was found the somewhat similar fossil elephant in 1801. It was considerably advanced towards decay, imbedded in a sandy bank, six feet above the water. It measured about eleven feet in length and ten and a half in height. The carcase of the animal, in all its bulk, was still covered with skin; but it was so far gone that only the head and feet could be removed. “I saw the parts,” says Pallas, “ at Irkutsk, and at the first glance perceived they be- longed to a rhinoceros fully grown; the head espe- cially was easily distinguished, since it was covered with the hide, which had preserved its organization, many short hairs remaining upon it. The country watered by the Vilui,” he adds, “ is mountainous, and the strata horizontal: they consist of sandy and calcareous schists, and beds of clay mixed with great quantities of pyrite. * * * Near the spot and close to the river there is a little hillock of about ninety fect elevation, and which, though sandy, contains beds of grind or mill-stone. The body of the rhinoceros was buried in a coarse sandy gravel, near this hillock ; and the nature of the soil, which is always frozen, must have preserved it. The ground is never thawed to any great depth near the river. MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 49 In the valleys, where the soil is half sand and half clay, it is still frozen, at the close of summer, two feet below the surface. Had it not been for these circumstances, the skin and other soft parts could not have been so long preserved. This crea- ture could not have been transported from the torrid zone to these frozen regions, except at the time of the deluge; the ancient chronologies being silent concerning any later change, to which might be attributed these remains of the rhinoceros, mam- moth, &c. every where found throughout Siberia.” soe Be. 145 1805 It is in this work likewise that we find the first detailed account of the Dziggtar or wild horse of Tartary, which the natives assert is the swiftest of animals, the fleetest of horses not being able to approach it. . Its whole natural history is most . fully dwelt upon (T. iv. 306), but must here be omitted, as must also many notices we had marked about domestic cattle, sheep, goats, seals, ermines, hares, &c. And as with these mammalia, so must it be with birds. His notice concerning the golden eagle (Chrysetos) is very curious, and we think new. “ There is,” he remarks, “ another singular branch of commerce: the Russians sell many golden eagles in barter to-the Tartars. These birds are very much in request by the Kirguis, who train them to chase the wolf, the fox, and the gazelle. According to certain markings and movements, these people judge of the bird’s excellence and its capability of VOL. I. D 50 á MEMOIR OF PALLAS. being trained. A Kirguis will often give a first- rate horse for an eagle of good breed, whilst he will not give a sheep, or a halfpenny, for one ina which he does not discover the requisite qualities. I have sometimes seen them seated for hours over an eagle, examining its merits and defects.” (T. i. 36—38.) Some of his statements respecting the pelican are also singular:—“ They congregate in troops of twenty on the banks of the rivers and bays; and on commencing their fishing in concert, they arrange themselves in an extended line, and altogether beat the water with their wings, to attract the fish, which they then seize upon. They seek their food principally before day-break and about mid-day, and they entirely clear of fish every lake they visit. When they do not find either lakes or ponds, which they prefer, they resort to the Oural. They are of a prodigious size, measuring five feet from beak to tail and eight feet and'a half across the wings, and weighing from eighteen to twenty-five pounds.” (Ib. 589.) With a curious remark concerning the starling, we shall dismiss his notices on ornithology. “ The river-starling, so common in Russia and Siberia, and so rare elsewhere, frequents the terri- tories of the Oural in great numbers. We may afirm with great certainty, that this bird dives, without wetting itself, into the deepest streams, to catch the water-snails and other worms which are found in the bed of the river. When shot, but not killed on the frozen edges of the stream, they imme- diately dive, and do not reappear on the surface till MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 51 they are dead. We are not, however, to conclude that this bird swims, since it has not the necessary instruments ; but it flies, so to speak, in the water ; and it has probably the power of hooking itself to the bottom of the river whilst searching for its prey.” (Jb. 146.) We must now bring these extracts to a close, and. must altogether deny ourself and readers the plea- sure which might be derived from his numerous notices on ichthyology, and the various modes in which the fisheries are conducted; as also on ento- mology, including so many of the attractive wonders of the insect world; and so likewise, finally, must we omit the whole wide field of botany, not one specimen of which ever seems to have escaped his piercing and scrutinizing glance. But the many objects which during these six years of travel Pallas had witnessed, and which were alluded to in the work on which we have been dwelling, had taken too strong a hold on his imagination to permit him to be content with the somewhat hasty sketches he supplied in this jour- nal; he had extensively and deeply studied man and animals, the crust of the earth, and whatever is found upon it; and meditating on his remarks, - they became the subjects of so many distinct trea- tises, to which he devoted all his powers. He now published “ The History of the more remarkable Animals of Siberia, including the Musk Ox, the Glutton, the Sable, the White Bear, &c. ;” histories which are so full and admirably given, that, according 52 = MEMOIR OF PALLAS. to Cuvier, no animal, even the commonest among. ourselves, are so well known. He also introduced to notice a new species of wild cat (Nov. Com. Pet. ann. 1781), and supplied information on the wild ass of the desert (Act. Petr. i.) ; also concerning the small buffalo or yak, and regarding those small yellow foxes (Canis corsac) of northern India which some believe to be the pretended golden ants of Herodotus. (Veve Nordische Beytrage, i. 29.) “ Tt is a pity,” remarks Cuvier, “that Buffon did not acquaint himself with these invaluable memoirs, the simple translation of which would have made an admirable addition to his work.” The Lepus and Mus genera alone, including hares, rats, and mice, supplied materials fur a quarto of two hun- dred and sixty pages (Nor. Spe. Quadrup. e. Gli- rium Ordine) with many beautifully illustrative engravings; a striking warrant and example for our present work, and for those monographs we are making it our business to supply. There are thirty- two engravings of the genus Mus alone, frequently illustrative not only of their general appearance, but of their habits, layers, food, and capture. The following is Cuvier’s estimate of this work :—“ The history and anatomy of these animals are unfolded with that rich amplification of which Buffon and Daubenton alone had previously set the example; and although, from modesty, the author has not established new genera, yet his descriptions are so precise, that any intelligent systematist may casily extract the generic characters from them.” MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 53 In 1781, he began a work which he meant parti- cularly to dedicate to the insects of Russia (Jcones Insectorum, &c.), although only two numbers ap- peared. But it is quite impossible here to enume- rate in detail the numerous quadrupeds, birds, reptiles, fishes, mollusca, worms, and zoophytes, of which he at this time published the original descrip- tion. The simple enumeration of the memoirs which he sent to the various academies to which he be- longed, would occupy much room. He was not even alarmed at the prodigious project of a general history of the animals and plants of the Russian empire; and he had really made great progress in its execution, although the labour must have pre- sented innumerable difficulties. _ Pallags circumstances, perhaps, still more than his tastes, contributed to make him a devoted botanist. Having in 1781 published “ A Cata- logue of the Plante in Mr Demidof’s Garden at Moscow, ” (Enumeration Plant., &c.), the Empress, whose love of the inih was flattered with the idea of a “ Flora Russica,” directed all the her- baria which had been collected by previous travellers to be sent him, and engaged him to undertake the work, she becoming somponttble for the expense. Pallas himself had nade very considerable collec- tions, and the work promised to extend widely our knowledge of the vegetable kingdom. Two volumes only, NA appeared, iain contain principally trees and shrubs; and this because in Russia, as in most other kingdoms, a change of ministry puts a | | | | | O F prs Re | ‘if ji I i E | 4 di iim): mi ji i EE i i l il i g E 4 f j i H y | PA 4 | eg q | $ H l EE i Hi H || ke | cee i i f Ii E, li p O e | í q . 1 | f i i i | Į | i i | | = i Ht \ ht fi 54 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. stop to those most important publications, when the new government has no immediate interest in them. Our author endeavoured subsequently to exhibit part at least of his botanical discoveries, in less magnificent works, and by foreign assistance. These volumes of the Empress truly merit the appel- lation of magnificent; so much so, that they are almost beyond the attainment of private individuals. They are of imperial folio size, and the coloured plates amounting, if we remember right, to nearly a hundred, of large dimensions and high finish, are truly beautiful and satisfactory. Each plant is exhibited in its different stages of growth, on diffe- rent branches,—the bud, leaf, flower, and fruit. The last plate is a finely coloured representation of specimens of most of the native woods which are used for economic purposes, amounting, we think, to about twenty-five varieties. His next work on botany was the history of the Astraguli; then another on the Halophytes, and others on Absinthes and the Armoises ; but the progress of the last was arrested by the miseries of the German war. The interruption to the Professors Flora Russica did not prevent him from undertaking, as we before hinted, a work equally extensive on the animals (Fauna Asiat. Russica) of the empire, a region which nourishes nearly all those of Europe, the greater part of those of Asia, and which possesses a great number that are peculiar to itself. One volume of this work was printed at Petersburg; but for several years at least it was not published. (Eloge, MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 55 135.) Pallas laboured at it till his last days, and had completed the manuscript, including all the vertebrate animals; and M. Rudolphi, who had seen the work, states that it described many new species and contained many interesting views. Nor was Pallas engrossed only with his own publications, but with much kindness and praise- worthy zeal he exerted himself to do justice to the memories of his less fortunate associates. Though during his travels and afterwards, much annoyed with ophthalmia, one of his most distressing but not most dangerous complaints, yet he had fared better than most of the others, few of whom lived to publish the relation of their adventures. Both Gmelin and Guldenstredt had fallen victims in the service, and Pallas, in 1784, undertook the task of publishing their papers, and executed it with great diligence and accuracy ; though we believe that these works, like several more peculiarly his own, but very partially saw the light. It was about this time that our naturalist was distinguished by a peculiar mark of imperial favour, in being appointed member of the Board of Mines, with a salary of £200 a-year, and honoured with the order of Vlodimir. The Empress likewise pur- chased his ample collection of natural history, m a manner highly flattering to the owner and honour- able to herself. Being informed that he was desirous of disposing of the collection, the Empress informed him that the country could not be deprived of so excellent a museum; that she would become the woe ae SEP A = oe e mpe | | 56 MEMOIR OF PALLAS: purchaser, at the same time desiring him to make out the catalogue and fix the price. He accordingly named fifteen thousand rubles. Having examined the catalogue, she subjoined, with her own hand, « Mr Pallas understands natural history much bet- ‘ter than figures : he ought to have charged twenty thousand instead of fifteen thousand rubles, for so many valuable articles. The Empress, however, takes upon herself to correct the mistake, and hereby orders her treasurer to pay twenty thousand. At- the same time, Mr Pallas shall not be deprived of his collection, which shall still continue in his own possession during his life, as he so well understands how to render it most useful to mankind.” It has been acutely observed, that it rarely hap- pens that men who are very assiduously occupied in such multifarious enterprises have the requisite op- portunities and powers for originating those master ideas which effect great changes in the sciences ; but Pallas was an exception to this rule. It has already been noticed that he all but changed the face of zoology; and it has been stated upon high authority, that he was really the instrument of effecting a revolution in geology, concerning what has been called the theory of the earth. An atten- tive examination of the two great mountain ranges of Siberia, led him to the recognition of this general rule, which has since been universally verified, that there is a regular succession in the three primitive orders of mountain rocks, viz. that there is a granite in the middle, then schists lymg upon it, and, MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 57 lastly, limestone strata the most external. “ It may be stated,” says Cuvier, “that this great fact, clearly expressed in 1777, in a memoir read to the Peters- bug Academy (Art. Petro. 1778) in the presence of Gustavus III. King of Sweden, gave birth to a new view of geology ; and that Saussure, Deluc, and Werner, starting from this observation, arrived at a correct koiuiiig of the true structure of the earth, very different indeed from the absurd ideas of previous writers.” All the writings on which we have hitherto dwelt, more especially belong to the department of natural history in the more extended signification of the term; this, however, is not the case with regard to our authors history of the Mongolian Gaii A work which must interest every well educated man, for it is perhaps the most classical treatise on the varieties of our race that exists in any language. ; The name of Mongul might be extended to all those tribes of the north oe east of Asia, whose oblique eyes, yellow complexion, black and lank hair, slender beard, and projecting cheek bones, make them appear so frightful to us; and one tribe of which ravaged Europe, under Attila, in the fifth century. At the same time the name belongs more especial F to another tribe, which, under Gengis-Khan, in the eleventh century, established the basis of the most formidable dominion which * Collection of Documents concerning the Monguls, in German, 2 vols. 4to. 1776, 1801. i or — FE gee 58 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. the world has ever seen. China, India, Persia, and the whole of Tartary, were necessarily subjected to its sway; Russia, too, was rendered tributary, and irruptions were made into Poland and Hungary. In a very few ages, however, the fortunes of these invaders. became changed: they were driven from China and Persia; they were extirpated in India, subjugated by the Russians in the western part of their ancient conquests, and by the Chinese in the country of their origin; and since that time they have been able to preserve only a few independent establishments in some districts to the west of the Caspian, where they follow a pastoral life, a great number wandering, as did their ancestors, over the immense deserts of central Asia, expecting that the discord or the decay of neighbouring empires may permit some enterprising adventurer again to sum- mon them to new conquests. It is this desire that Russia and China seek to thwart, by sowing dis- sension among them, by reducing their number, and by sometimes transplanting them to enormous distances, when they have a pretext after a meeting or rebellion. And, nevertheless, in this persecuted state, these unfortunate men maintain all the pride of rank and nobility ; they preserve their long gene- alogies, and their princes cabal against each other, and intrigue at the court of their chief for the aug- mentation of authority. The grand Lama, too, who rules over their consciences through the agency of a religious corps, confers, by his patents, what is esteemed a sacred character on this authority; and MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 59 thereby subjects himself to much trouble and vexa- tion. We cannot convey a better idea of those constant agitations, than by reciting an event nar- rated in detail by Pallas, and which gives an idea of those famous migrations which formerly consti- tuted a remarkable epoch in the history of Europe. An entire people, who, after the conquest of Kien- Long, lately emperor of China, had fled for refuge to the Russian territory, and who had been esta- blished since the year 1758, in the rural district of Astrakan, having become dissatisfied, and, moreover, influenced by the intrigues of their chief Lama, resolved twelve years afterwards to return to the country which had been subjugated by China. Their preparations continued for many months without their secret being divulged ; and, finally, on an ap- pointed day in the commencement of 1771, the whole nation, men, women, and children, to the amount of more than 60,000 families, marched off in three divisions, with their tents, their flocks, their bag- gage, and all they could pick up in their route either of men or wealth. Thus did they travel 1500 miles without being arrested by the troops which pu: sued them, nor by opposing rivers, nor by the interme- diate hostile tribes, nor by the mortality which prevailed among them and their cattle. We believe that no other event of the sort, to the same extent, ` had previously occurred, since the flight of the Israelites from the land of Egypt. Pallas does not treat only of the origin and physi- cal characters of these people, nor of their manners 60 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. and government, but devotes a large portion of his work to an account of their religion, which is truly shocking and singular in its essence and history. Tt is not a little astonishing that this work has not been translated either into French or English, whilst every day increases the number of travels which are of infinitely less value. “ This is a work,” says Mr Tooke in his Russia Illustrata, “ that will enrich the stock of human knowledge with discoveries, the greatest part entirely new, and which no person but Professor Pallas is able to communicate.” A most important part of the history of nations, and one which enables us to penetrate farther into the antiquity of their history than all written docu- ments, is the knowledge of their language. Itis by it we can judge of their origin, and can better follow their genealogy than by all their traditions; and there is no government which can more promote this important study than that of Russia, whose subjects speak sixty different languages. Catherine II. con- ceived the ingenious idea of making a digest of the vocabularies of all the tribes which yielded obedi- ence to her sceptre: she actually commenced. this work herself, and then charged Professor Pallas, who was the individual who had seen most of these hordes, and was best acquainted with their language, to col- lect together all the Asiatic vocabularies, at the same . time restricting him to a list of words which she had drawn up. Hence the two quartos under the title “ Linguarum totius Orbis Vocabularia Com- parativa.” It is not matter of astonishment that a MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 61 woman and a sovereign did not happen to make the best possible selection, nor act with as correct views as a scholar would have done; but it is difficult to conceive how those she engaged to co-operate with her, did not venture to point out to her the imper- fection of her plan, seeing it is very clear that a dry vocabulary could never supply an idea of the mechanism and genius of a language. But notwith- standing all this, the treatise before us is a truly valuable work, and has been useful in promoting the researches of other learned men. The Empress seemed never to weary in giving her favourite Naturalist fresh proofs of her partiality and confidence. He was appointed a member of the commission which was selected in 1777 to pre- pare a new topography of the empire; he was also elected historiographer to the admiralty, an office which obliged him to give attention to many scien- tific questions aitad with the navy; and the Grand Duke Alexander, lately Emperor, and his brother, the present Grand Duke Constantine, re- ceived his instructions on the subjects of natural history and physics. Thus employed in so truly an re manner by government, distinguished by titles corresponding to his employments, and esteemed by all the learned men in Europe, Pallas enjoyed at Petersburg all the consideration which could be paid to him in his twofold character of a foreigner and a literary man ; but it would likewise appear that his long habit of 62 À MEMOIR OF PALLAS. travelling, like that of a savage life, made him impatient of a stated residence in a city. Equally tired of a sedentary life and of the influx of the fashionable world, whether foreign or native, for which the mansion of so celebrated a man was the natural rendezvous, he eagerly seized the oppor- tunity which the conquest of the Crimea afforded of visiting new countries, and spent the years 1793 and 1794 in travelling, at his own expense, over the southern provinces of the empire. He was accompanied by an able draftsman and other pro- fessional assistants, who afforded him all possible facilities for improving his opportunities ; and hence his published work is literally crowded with sketches of all sorts, with views, maps, &c. He again visited Astrakan, and travelled over the frontiers of Circassia,—that mountainous region, which supports some of the finest races of the species. This country is also remarkable for the great number of tribes, differing in language and appearance, which it maintains in its ravines,—the small remnants of those nations which traversed it at the time of the vast migrations of mankind,— the Huns, the Allans, the ‘Bulgarians, and those many other barbarians, whose very names were almost as terrible as their cruelty, and who left colonies amid the precipices of the Caucasus; and hence it has been remarked, that we may here find mankind in samples. An account of these travels appeared in German in 1799, in French in 1801, MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 63 and in English in 1802. The plan pursued, and the style of these volumes, are very similar to those of his earlier “ Travels,” already dwelt upon. As this is the only work of our author, which we have seen, to which the English reader can have access, we shall quote a paragraph which may help him to form his own estimate both of the original and the translation, which, upon the whole, is excellent :— “ The Asiatic method of rearing silk-worms is pre- ferable to the Russian. The Persian rears his mul- berry trees to about six feet high, which they attain in four or five years. He then begins to lop their tops and branches, which are given to the insects, as soon as they have sufficient strength, by placing them gently on their beds. By this means the shoots remain fresh and succulent, and the worms devour them even to the woody fibres, so that no part of the nutritive foliage is wasted. As these insects are every day supplied with food, the leafless branches gradually form a kind of wicker-work, through which the impurities pass; so that the cheerful worms preserve the requisite cleanliness without trouble to the cultivator, and speedily attain a vigorous state. In this manner they are continually supplied with leaves till they prepare to spin, when small dry brushwood is placed in all directions over the leafless branches, and on this the worms spin their silk.”—(Vol. i. p. 190.) But Pallas did not wish to incur risk by remain- ing among a people who are no less dangerous than they are interesting. He ere long, then, proceeded 64 ` MEMOIR OF PALLAS. to the Crimea or ancient Taurica, that singular peninsula, which is flat and arid on the side next the continent, and bristled on the opposite side with mountains which enclose many a smiling valley. It was in ancient times occupied by Grecian colonies, then during the middle ages by the Genoese, and afterwards inhabited by the Tartars, who speedily acquired peaceable dispositions, and, finally, it had lately fallen under the power of the Russians. It is matter of history, in what more than regal splendor Potemkin conducted his imperial mistress into this new conquered region, and by what profligacy of expense and despotism this favourite converted, for some days, the sterile desert into the guise of a fertile and flourishing country. It has been said that Pallas partook of the delusion of his sovereign ; or perhaps the contrast between the dreary plains of the north, and those agreeable valleys, with their southern exposure, delightful sea view, and rich vines and flowers, overcame him. He sketched a most enchanting picture of Taurida (Tableau Phy- sique, &c. de la Tarida); and the proof that his genuine sentiments were therein expressed, is found in his desire to retreat thither himself. It is likewise, however, true, that repose, of which he had long been deprived, was now become highly necessary for him. In his latter travels, whilst wishing to examine the banks of a river which was frozen over, the ice gave way, and he was precipi- tated into the water. At a distance from every convenience, he was transported many miles exposed MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 65 to great cold, with very insufficient covering. This accident produced pains, which he hoped the mild climate to which he was resorting would abate ; but, on the contrary, change of residence, far from assuag- ing, only added to his physical ailments more insup- portable sufferings, disappointments, and anxieties. The Empress, on being informed of Pallas's desire to take up his abode in the Crimea, with much kindness gave him a grant of two villages which were situated in the richest district of the peninsula, along with a large mansion in the town of Sympe- ropol, at that time chief city of the district, along with a considerable sum of money for his settlement. He resorted to this “ scene of delights” at the end of the year 1795; but the climate, which had ap- peared. so delightful during a short journey, even- tually proved damp and variable; extensive marshes rendered the beautiful valleys pestilential in autumn ; the winters also proved tempestuous, so that the in- conveniences of both a northern and southern climate were experienced. Besides, the property which was conferred somewhat unceremoniously, found other claimants, which occasioned its new lord vexatious disputes and lawsuits. Finally, and more than all, Pallas had not sufficiently contemplated the void he would experience when removed from well educated men, and placed in a position where he could not enjoy the interchange of thought. Accordingly, he was now undeceived regarding his terrestrial para- dise, and in the preface of the second volume of his “ Travels,” he thus, in the year 1801, expresses his VOL. I ; E 66 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. disappointment :—“ Were this the proper place to inform my readers of the disquietude and hardships which oppress me in my present residence, and em- bitter my declining days, I could easily apologise for the late appearance of this volume.” But notwithstanding these feelings, he remained nine years longer in this country, occupied with the continuation of his works, and labouring also to accomplish a project which was very important for Russia, the improved culture of the vine, quantities -of which he had planted in the valley of Sondac, the ancient Saldaca of the Genoese. He had satis- fiedhimself that this country was the more suitable for its growth, because he supposed he had found the vine in its wild state, although probably it was nothing more than the degenerated stock of the ancient Grecian vineyards. It was, when thus engaged, that he was visited _ by our countryman, Dr Clarke, whose account is interesting :—“ This city,” he remarks, “ will long be celebrated as the residence of Professor Pallas, so well known to the literary world. His fame would have been sufficiently established, if he had pub- lished no other work than that begun by him under such favourable auspices, the “ Flora Rossica ;” yet the barbarity of the people, with whom he is com- pelled to live, is such, that they will not allow him to complete the undertaking. The drawings are all finished, and almost all the text. To the hospitality and humane attentions of this excellent man we were indebted for comforts, equal, if not superior, MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 67 to those of our own country, and for every literary communication it was in-his power to supply. When we delivered our letters of recommendation to him, he received us rather as a parent than a stranger to whose protection we had been consigned. We refused to intrude by occupying apartments in his house: this had more the appearance of a palace than the residence of a private gentleman ; but one day when we were absent upon an excursion, he caused all our things to be moved, and upon our return we found a suite of rooms prepared for our reception, with every convenience for study and repose. I consider myself indebted to him even for my life. The fatigue of travelling, added to the effect of bad air and unwholesome food, rendered a quartan fever so habitual to me, that, had it not been for his care and skill, I should not have lived to make this grateful acknowledgment. He pre- scribed for me; administered every medicine with his own hands; carefully guarded my diet; and, after nursing me as his own son, at last restored me to health. : When I recovered, he ransacked his - museum for drawings, charts, maps, books, anti- quities, minerals, and whatever else might gratify our curiosity, or promote the object of our travels; he accompanied us upon the most wearisome excur- sions, in search not only of the insects and plants of the country, but also of every document likely to illustrate either its ancient or its modern history. His decline of life had been embittered by a variety of afflictions, which he bore with stoical philoso- 68 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. phy. We used every endeavour to prevail upon him to quit the country and accompany us to Eng- land; but the advanced period of his life, added to the certainty of losing all his property in Russia, prevented his acquiescence. Our entreaties were to no effect ; and perhaps before this meets the public eye, our friend and benefactor will be no more.”* These gloomy anticipations of Dr Clarke’s were fortunately disappointed. But time and circum- stances, instead of reconciling Pallas to his lot, only aggravated all the privations and annoyances to which he felt himself subjected, and he'could not be reconciled to his mode of life. All the marks of esteem, likewise, which he received from Europe, only increased his chagrin, and recalled to his vivid recollection the interests he had left behind. At length, therefore, having made up his mind to re- move, he sold his property for a very inadequate price, bid a final adieu to Russia, and, after an ab- sence of forty-two years, returned to his native land, with the intention of there terminating his days. This change, to a man who had lived fifteen years in Little Tartary, was almost a return to ano- ther world. Some old friends, too, whom he rejoined, seemed almost to renew his youth; and he was -always excited to warmth and eloquence when he listened to the account of the advance of science, the intelligence of which had penetrated most imper- = * See Dr Clarke’s Travels, quoted in Rees; also Tooke’s “Review of the Russian Empire. MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 69 fectly into his solitude: his calmed mind now re- vived prodigiously under all these gratifications and delights, The young Naturalists who had been created by his works, impressed with the admiration of his genius, though he had been to them an invisible oracle, listened to him as a superior being who was come to make his estimate of their acquirements ; for his long absence had multiplied time, and inter- posed many generations between them and him. In the frank and ready approbation he bestowed on all new discoveries, they recognised, in this excellent old man, a mind above the common prepossessions of his years; and he always treated his new scho- lars, not as a churl, but asa father. It is true that he had never been disposed severely to criticise, and that in all his works he freely gave to his contemporaries their due praise; a practice which was not less me- ritorious as bestowed upon his pupils. It is likewise true, that he is, perhaps, of all naturalists of the eighteenth century, the one who has least been criticised by others. He has sometimes, indeed, been accused of a certain ardour in amassing from all quarters, and almost of monopolizing the observa- tions and subjects of study selected by others; a conduct which is calculated to displease those whose limited labours may readily be lost in the blaze of glory which legitimately belongs to the man who has conceived a vast plan, and without which an immensity of facts, which become useful chiefly from their approximation, would have been lost to 70 MEMOIR OF PALLAS. - science. Besides, he had never borrowed from others without rendering them explicit justice. | Thus restored to the country of his nativity, and to a circle of admiring friends, and more especially enjoying the society of a brother in whom long separation had only caused the natural affection more ardently to glow, and watched over by an only daughter who loved him with the utmost tenderness, Pallas looked forward to years of happiness. He read with the deepest interest all new works on natural history, and projected a visit to the towns of France and Italy which were richest in museums ; and anticipated no small happiness in making the acquaintance of the eminent men he would neces- sarily have met with; whilst he would collect new materials which would enable him to put the last finish to his own labours. The germs, however, of those maladies which he had contracted during his travels and his sojourn in the Crimea, developed themselves with a severity and rapidity he had little expected. They seemed soon to be beyond the reach of medicine; and, as he had ever been em- ployed, his closing days were spent in making arrangements for the continuation of those works which he left incomplete, in a way which promised the greatest utility and advantage. He died on the 8th of September, 1811, having almost attained the limit of seventy years. He was twice married, and left behind him a daughter, to whom we have just alluded. She became the wife, and afterwards the widow, of MEMOIR OF PALLAS. 71 Baron Wimpfen, lieutenant-general in the Russian service, who died at Lunéville in consequence of wounds received at the battle of Austerlitz. In the review of Pallags history, it is impossible not to recognise great sagacity, and the most de- voted enthusiasm in his pursuits. The peace in which he lived with his competitors, very decidedly proclaims amiability, for it is difficult to attribute it only to prudence; and though nothing so much disposes to the exercise of benevolence as the expe- riencing it, yet it does not always happen that where a man is not assailed he does not attack others. Those who were personally acquainted with him commend the evenness and sprightliness of his dis- position. He had no objection to pleasure as a relaxation, but would never allow it to interfere with his usefulness or repose. He was all his life greatly engrossed with his scientific pursuits, and experienced in them his chief and most satisfactory delights. APPENDIX. CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF SOME OF THE WORKS OF PALLAS. i [The reader will please to remember, that we do not give the following as a complete list of our author’s Works; but, having experienced the want of such a catalogue our- selves, we haye heen at some pains, even partially, to supply the deficiency for the use of others. We trust it may be useful, so far as it goes, and may lead to a more perfeet enumeration, which would be esteemed by all Naturalists. } 2 1760. De Infestis Viventibus intra Viventia. Lugd. Bat. This is his Thesis, on becoming M. D. 1763. Fauna Insectorum Marchica. * A Descrip- tion of the Insects in the March of Bran- denburg.” So quoted in Rees. 1764. Pallas was this year elected Fellow of the Royal Society of London. He had pre- viously presented a paper; and we have APPENDIX. 13 seen it noted that he sent three. The only one we have met is on the Siæna jacu- latriz. Thomsons Hist. Royal Society. He also sent Memoirs to the Acad. Cæser. Nat. Curiosorum. But we cannot supply a list of them. 1766. Elinchus Zoophytorum, Sistens generum ad umbrationes generaliores et specierum cognitarum succinctas descriptiones. 8vo. Hagæ-Comitum. 1766. Miscellania Zoologica, quibus nove imprimis atque obscure animalium species descri- buntur. Hagæ. 1767. Spicileyia Zoologica (Fascic. 4). 4to. Berlini. 1768-70. Spicilegia Zoologica (Fascic. 6). 4to. Berl. 1768. Descriptio tubularie fungione prope Wolo- demerum mense Julio 1768, Observate. Nov. Com. Acad. Sc. Imp. Petro. 1768. . 1769. De Ossibus Siberiæ fossilibus Crantis præ- sertim rhinocerotum et buffalotorum Obser- vationes (c. Tab.). Nov. Com. Petro., t. xii. 1769. Descriptio Leporis pusilli (c. Tab.). Nov. Com. Petro., 1769. 1771-6. Voyages of Pallas Gn German) in diferent Provinces of the Russian Empire, 3 vols. published respectively in 1772, 1773, and 1776, with many plates and maps. There are two editions of a very good . French translation, by M. Gauthier. de la Peyro- née, one in 5 vols. 4to. with one of plates, with Notes on the Natural History by APPENDIX. the Count Lacépéde, 1788 ; and the other in 8 vols. 8vo. and one of plates, with Notes by Lamarck and Longles, in 1793. An Account of the Rhinoceros found on the Banks of the Vilui in 1771. We cannot refer either to the exact date or work in which this memoir may be found. ` Leporis minuti Descriptio, &e. “ Dissert. de Acad. Imp. des Sciences de Peters- burg,” (Cuv. Eloge). Mustellæ Sarmatice Descriptio. “ Nouv. Com. de Petro.,” t. xiv. p. 441. Equus Hemionus. The Dzhiggtai or Wild Siberian Horse described. Nov. Com. Petro., t. xix. (Hloge). 1773-80. Some riei Quadrupeds of Siberia. (Four Nos.) Probably additional Nos. of Spicilegia Zoologica, quoted as under. Spicilegia Zoologica, 14 Nos. 4to. Berlin, 1767-80. 1766 and 1801. Collection (in German) of Docu- ments on the Political, Physical, and Civil History of the Mongul Tribes. 1777. Observations sur la Formation des image Act. Petro., Part I. Published separately at Petersburg, and reprinted at Paris in 1779 and 1782. Mr Tooke has given a translation in his “ Russia Illustrata.” 777. Obs. de dentibus molaribus fossilibus ignoti Animalis Canadensibus analogis, etiam ad Vralense jugum reperitis. Part II. 3 "5 APPENDIX. 4 . Obs. circa Myrmecophagum Afric. et Didel- phidis novam speciem orientalem. Part iI. . Description du Buffle à queue de Cheval, et Observations generales sur les espèces sau- vage des gros Betail. Ib. . Obs. sur V Ane dans son état sauvage, et sur le veritable Onagre des Anciens. Ib.; also in his Neue Nordische Beyträge, t. ii. p. 22, pl. i. Description of the small yellow Fow of northern India, in Neue Nordische Beytrage. . Novae Species Quadrupedum ea Glirium Or- dine. Ato. Erlang. . Descriptiones Plantarum Siberie peculiarium. Act. Petro. . Capra Caucasiea e Schedis A. J. Grildenstidt. «Second Memoir on the Fossile Bones of the great Animals found in Siberia.” (Eloge). Distinct Memoir on the Aerolite found in Si- beria, (Cuv. Eloge). _ Mem. on the Degeneration of Animals. Act. i Petro., Part II. (Eloge). . Galeopithicus volans Camellia descriptus. Act. Petro., Part I. . . Sur les anciens travaux de Mines quon trouve en Siberie, et sur leurs rapports avec coun de Hongrie. Act. Petro. . Descriptio Didelphis brachyure. Part II. . Enumeratio Plantarum que in horto Procopii à demidof Moscua vigent. Act. Petro. . Felis Manul nova Species Asiatica. Act. Petr. sl EE OE 76 > APPENDIX. 1781. Sorices Aliquot illustrati. Sorex moschalus et Ñ. myosurus c. Tabulis. Act. Petr. 1781. New Northern Collection (in German) on vari- ous Subjects in Geography, Nat. History, and Agriculture, to which were afterwards added two more volumes (apud Rees). 1781-2. Icones Insectorum presertim Russie Ñi- beriag. peculiarium. Ato. Erlang. 1784. Giildenstidts Remains, containing his Journal and Description of the Caucasus. (Rees.) 1784-88. Flora Rossica, seu Stirpium imperii Rossii per Europeum et Asiam indigenarum de- scriptiones et icones, in fol. Petr. tom. ii. 1786-9. Linguarum totius Orbis Vocabularia Com- parativa augustissime Cure Collecta, t. ii. in 4to. Petro. 1799. Tableau physique et topographique de la Tau- ride, in Nov. Act. Petro., reprinted in Paris in 1800. 1799. Travels through the Southern Provinces of the Russian Empire, in the Years 1793-4, 2 vols. 4to. with many coloured plates. Published in German in 1799 ; in French, 1801; in English in 1802. 1800. Species Astragalarum descripte et iconibus coloratis instruct. In folio, Leipsic. 1803. Illustrationes Plantarum imperfecte vel non- . dum Cognitarum. In folio, Leipsic. 1811-12. Zoographia Rosso-Asiatica, 3 tom. 4to. Petersburg. INTRODUCTION. Wuen the interest attached to the higher orders of the brute creation is brought in review for the pur- pose of bestowing pre-eminence on one particular species, Europeans, with few dissentients, will con- sider them in relation to their utility for economic purposes. They will see in them objects of aliment and clothing; the producers of the raw materials for manufactures; they will think of navigation, exports, and imports, and then conclude that sheep and oxen are the most important animals to man. It is, however, probable that a Western Asiatic, from similar motives, would fix upon camels and drome- daries; a Nabob would point to his state elephant, and a Tartar, an Arab, a soldier, and a jockey, would unanimously claim the post of honour for the horse. No argument in favour of the Peruvian lama would be admitted; and the poor alone might perhaps muse upon the patient and hardy virtues of the ass. None but the savage and the mere sportsman would first think of the importance of the canine species. 73 INTRODUCTION. It may indeed be conceded, that in the social con- dition of nations long congregated and civilized, necessarily under the impulses of utilitarianism, dogs do not obtain that universal consideration which is granted to other animals in many respects their inferiors; and it is true that various tribes of the south-east abhor their presence, and view them only as scavengers, little better than the jackal and hyena. : But when the intellectual endowments of the domesticated races of dogs are permitted to weigh in the scale, —when we begin to consider the facul- ties which the bounty of Nature has bestowed upon them,—the sincerity and disinterestedness of their attachment, —the sagacity, strength, velocity, cou- rage, and perfect obedience which they proffer to man, —we cannot refuse them our admiration and affection. To what other species could we look for voluntary association with our fortunes? Which of them would, like the dog, lend us the full use of senses so acute as his? Which can rejoice in our joy, be vigilant and bold in our defence, obedient to order, faithful in our adversity, understand our least words and signs, and die on our graves from pure attachment? These qualities, we all know, dogs possess. Here, then, we find the source of that consideration which is granted them by all men near a state of nature; and although conceded by them with niggardly hands, the wild man of the Old World, the stoical hunter of the New, the half- frozen Esquimaux, and the savage of Australia, INTRODUCTION. i 79 differ only in their mode of acknowledgment, from the expressions of favour with which the drover, the shepherd, the sportsman, and the fine lady of civilized society regard them. As the dog alone, of all the brute creation, volun- tarily associates himself with the conditions of man’s existence, it is fair to presume also that he was the first and therefore the oldest of man’s companions ; that to his manifold good qualities the first hunters were indebted for their conquest and subjugation of other species. We do even now perceive, notwith- standing the advance of human reason. and the pro- gress of invention, that in a thousand instances we cannot dispense with his assistance. If we still feel the importance of his services in | our state of society, what must have been the ad- miration of Haunsbeak, or Anubis, is the more true Semitic term for barker, * In omnibus animalibus placidum eiusdem invenitur et ferum.—PLINyY. + What may be thought of the ancient opinions in Aris- « Ae Le F pap reae a ESE 82 ' INTRODUCTION. admitted the wolf and the jackal to be constituents of his genus Canis; but it does not appear that he entertained an opinion that his Canis familiaris, or domestic dog, was identical with either. Buffon viewed the shepherd’s dog of Europe as the original species from whence all the others had sprung, and in prosecuting his investigation, drew up a kind of genealogical table, showing how the varieties were derived by means of changes of climate, food, and education, and multiplied by crossing the races so produced to form all the others. There is both truth and ingenuity in these opi- nions of the eloquent writer; but it must neverthe- less be confessed, that his inferences being in a great measure fanciful and arbitrary, they should not have been permitted to exercise such an influence upon subsequent systematic writers, as evidently pervades their classifications, even though they have rejected his theory. Baron Cuvier, in his Regne Animal, considering the species to be distinct, remarks that “ taming the dog is the most complete, the most useful, and the most singular conquest man has achieved, the whole species having become our property.” Since that time Mr Hodgson, residing in a public capacity at Katmandoo, near that central region of the world where many of our most ancient elements of social existence seem to have emanated ; where totle, Calisthenes, Xenophon, Pliny, Oppian, Grotius, Pollux, &c., relative to Hybud dogs, sprung from lions, tigers, thoes, and foxes, will be examined in the sequel. INTRODUCTION. 83 many plants are found in a wild state that man appears to have carried with him in his devious migrations; and wild animals still exist, that may perhaps justly claim to be of the typical species first brought under human subjection; in that remote region, a wild dog, the Buanser (Canis primevus), is pointed out by him as the primitive species of the whole canine race. Another writer (Professor Kretschmer), in describing the most interesting mammalia of the Frankfort museum, chiefly col- lected by the indefatigable Ruppel, notices a jackal (Canis anthus, F. Cuv.) as the type of the dogs of ancient Egypt; and referring to the antique carved and painted figures in the temples, and a skull taken from the catacombs of Lycopolis, shows the resem- blance to be so great, that their identity cannot well be denied. More recently Mr Bell, in his History of British Quadrupeds, is inclined to conclude that the wolf is the original stock whence domesticated dogs are derived: for this purpose, that gentleman observes, & Tt is necessary to ascertain to what type the ani- mal approaches most nearly, after having for many successive generations existed in a wild state, re- moved from the influence of domestication and association with mankind. Now we find that there are several different instances of the existence of dogs in such a state of wildness as to have lost even that common character of domestication, variety of colour and marking; of these, two very remark- _ able ones are the Dhole of India and the Dingo of 84 INTRODUCTION. Australia; there is, besides, a half reclaimed race among the Indians of North America, and another partially tamed in South America, which deserve attention ; and it is found that these races, in diffe- rent degrees, and in a greater degree as they are more wild, exhibit the lank and gaunt form, the lengthened limbs, the long and slender muzzle, and the great comparative strength which characterise the wolf; and that the tail of the Australian dog, which may be considered as the most remote from a state of domestication, assumes the slightly bushy form of that animal. We have here, then, a con- siderable approximation to a well known wild animal of the same genus, in races which, though doubtless descended from domesticated ancestors, have gradually assumed the wild condition; and it is worthy of especial remark, that the anatomy of the wolf, and its osteology in particular, does not differ from that of dogs in general, more than the different kind of dogs do from each other. The cranium is absolutely similar, and so are all or nearly all the other essential parts ; and to strengthen still further the probability of their identity, the dog and wolf will readily breed together, and their progeny is fertile. The obliquity of the position of the eyes in the wolf, is one of the characters in which it differs from the dogs; and although it is very desirable not to rest too much upon the effects of habit or structure, it is not perhaps straining the point to attribute the forward direction of the eyes in the dogs, to the constant habit, for many succes- INTRODUCTION. — 85 sive generations, of looking forwards to their master and obeying his voice.” This extract, taken from the Penny Cyclopedia, where it appears as a quotation, is then followed up by a paragraph not clearly pointed out as being in continuation, though the diction. seems to be that of the same writer; it is as follows :—“ Another crite- rion, and a sound one, is the identity of gestation. Sixty-three days forms the period during which the bitch goes with young; precisely the same time elapses before the wolf gives birth to her offspring. Upon Buffon’s instance of seventy-three days, or rather the possibility of such a duration in the ges- tation of a particular she-wolf, we do not lay much stress, when opposed to such strong evidence of the usual period being sixty-three days; the young of both wolf and dog are born blind, and at the same or about the same time, viz. at the expiration of the tenth or twelfth day. Hunter's important experi- ments proved without doubt that the wolf and the jackal would breed with the dog, but he had not ‘sufficient data for coming to the conclusion that all three were identical as species. In the course of those experiments he ascertained that the jackal went fifty-nine days with young, whilst the wolf , went sixty-three; nor does he record that the pro- geny and the dog would breed together ; and he knew too well the value of the argument to be drawn from a fertile progeny, not to have dwelt upon the fact, if he had proved it; not to have mentioned it, at least, if he had even heard it.” ee EN NE ra 86 INTRODUCTION. Mr Bell concludes these observations in the fol- lowing words :—“ Upon the whole, the argument in favour of the view which I have taken, that the wolf is probably the original of all the canine races, may be thus stated. The structure of the animal is identical, or so nearly so as to afford the strongest à priori evidence in its favour. The dog must have been derived from an animal susceptible of the highest degree of domestication, and capable of great affection for mankind, which has been abun- dantly proved of the wolf. Dogs having returned to a wild state and continued in that condition through many generations, exhibit characters which approximate more and more to those of the wolf, in proportion as the influence of civilization ceases to act. The two animals will breed together and produce fertile young. The period of gestation is the same.” Unquestionably the foregoing observations are stated with considerable force, but the conclusions to be drawn from them do not appear to have satis- fied the writer, nor have they sufficient weight to be completely admissible. We shall therefore pro- ceed to offer some remarks upon the alleged facts, to show the reasons for withholding an unqualified assent ; and we may be allowed to remark that the statements are occasionally grounded upon insuffi- cient data: moreover, where the question of iden- tity, as in the present case, is concerned, it may be ‘doubted whether the words “ all or nearly all the essential parts being identical,” appear to be unob- jectionable. INTRODUCTION. 87 We may therefore commence out remarks by observing that dogs are found in every quarter of the globe, wherever man resides or has penetrated ; and ask whether, in the present state of our infor- mation, we can assert with safety that the common wolf (Canis lupus, auctor.) 18 to be found south | of the equator? That there are representatives of wolves or wild dogs beyond the Crishna in India, in the Australian islands, and in South America, 1s not the question; but so far as personal observation went, we have not met with the wolf of the western hemisphere to the south of the equator, nor are they known in South Africa. Next, it may be added, that as there are confessedly several species of wolf in North America, and probably also in the northern part of the Old World, are these species likewise derived from the C. lupus, or are they originally distinct? And if so, are they ex- cluded from the probability of being also in part a source whence domestic dogs are derived? If we assert the several species of wolf in the northern hemisphere to be mere varieties, are we sufficiently ‘well informed to infer that the wild canines of South America, India, Australia, Java, and Sumatra, and the black Derboun of Arabia and Tokla of Abyssinia, are also of the same origin? Again :—there are several species of foxes on the old and new conti- nents,—species that no zoologist will venture to declare of identical origin; and are we sure that their gestation is of sufficient difference not to per- mit them to breed a prolific offspring f 88 INTRODUCTION. Now, adverting to the circumstance of the fertility of the mixed breed between wolf and dog (one cer- tainly of very great weight), the experiments made by Buffon should have been taken into the account ; for that celebrated naturalist, after denying that they would commix, lived to prove that they bred, and the offspring of the wolf and dog to be prolific _ indeed, but that in four generations, the Hybrid | type, though not obliterated, had not passed into a | domesticated race. If wolves and dogs commixed | breed readily, how does it happen that several races _ of true dogs, such as mastiffs, bulldogs, and particu- larly the Irish greyhound, breed so imperfectly with their own variety of species that it requires much attention to preserve the race ? If the Australian Dingo be a true dog, what is the cause that experiments to make it breed with well selected individuals of the domestic species have failed? At least, this was the case at Paris.* Finally, if the facility of breeding together were admitted, would it establish identity of species? It is asserted, and we know of no contradiction, that the older breeds of sheep in Russia have very coarse fleeces, because they breed promiscuously with goats. Should this be a fact, and we believe it rests on the authority of Pallas, would the inference of the identity of the two species be established ? * We believe Sir John Jamieson, who made similar expe- riments in New Holland, was not more successful ; but I find that Mr Cunningham mentions a breed of Hybrids of the race to be now established in New Holland. INTRODUCTION. 89 Or in the case noticed by Mr Hodgson at Katman- doo, where his experiments proved the Capra tharal™ and domestic goat to breed together without diffi- culty. Are we thence to conclude that the musmon and the ibex, the tharal and the domestic goat, are mere varieties of one species ? Almost all recent writers on dogs have copied one another so repeatedly, that it is scarcely possible to trace the original authority whence given state- ments of facts have been taken. We cannot there- fore refer to the text whence Mr Bell drew his conclusions ; that there exist “ several different in- stances of dogs in such a state of wildness as to have lost even that common character of domestica- tion,—variety of colour and marking ;” naming as examples the Dhole of India, the Dingo of Aus- tralia, a half reclaimed race of North America, and another partially tamed in South America. Now, if the source whence this statement be derived is the Supplement to the Carnassiers of Mr Griffith’s English edition of Cuviers Animal Kingdom, we may state that it is from one of our own notes, and that the words are, in part at least, those we used ; but it certainly was not, in the original, intended to decide the question, whether these animals were specifically distinct, —wild aborigine, or the descend- ants of domestic dogs. The writer of the article used his own discretion; and even he placed it in * This name must not be confounded with the O. Jaela, Ham, Smith.—No. 869 of Griffith’s An. Kingd. 90 INTRODUCTION. the first division of his arrangement, where he refers to the wolf; and thus far left the argument of identity and filiation untouched.* All we as yet know of the Dhole or Quihoe would lead us to a contrary conclusion.t The Dingo is indeed better known: his conformation in general, and the fact of his being in a country of marsupial animals, as yet almost the only true mamiferous animal found in a state of nature, offers a fairer field for presuming his identity with domestic dogs ; but the failure of mixing his race with the Euro- * In the plate of heads of dogs in Mr Griffith’s Animal Kingdom, representing wild varieties of the dog taken from Colonel Hamilton Smith’s drawings, the engraver has erro- neously marked the numbers. Head, No. 1, is that of the Dhole; 2, of the South American wolf or dog; 3, of the Dingo; and 4, of a specimen formerly in the possession of Mr G. Astor of New York, which he denominated, and by comparison with numerous skins, proved to be of the wolf of the Falkland Islands. + If Mr Bell, in referring to the Dhole of Asia, had in view the observations of Mr Frederick Cuvier (in the Dic- tionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, at the word Chien), it will appear that, on this occasion, that learned and attentive observer quoted from Captain Williamson’s Oriental Field Sports, probably without referring to the text; for he cites the plate where some Pariah’ dogs have driven a panther into a mango tree, and not that where Dholes attack a tiger. On consulting Captain Williamson’s text, he speaks of the Dhole as a wild dog, but he does not say that this animal is de- seended from a domestic breed. The context would lead to a different conclusion. As for the plate, it was Colonel Hamilton Smith who made the sketch of the Dholes, not very correctly reproduced in the plate. INTRODUCTION. ' Qi pean, demands at least that we should suspend our opinion until this question be better elucidated. As for those of America, the half reclaimed of the north is presumed to refer to our description of a domesti- cated individual that had been the property of the celebrated Indian chief Tecumséh, one which we regarded as coming nearer to the Coyotl of Mexico than the wolf: neither that specimen nor others of the same stock that came under our observation, were either gaunt or long-legged ; and with regard to the South American partially tamed species, we there referred to the Aguara* dogs of the Caribs, Tapuias, and Arookas, all seemingly allied to the wild dogs of the primeval woods along the Oro- noque. We may therefore conclude, that reasoning upon such a statement, where the word dogs was used, is mistaking the common acceptation of that name for the generical term which naturalists, for ihe convenience of classification, have adopted and applied in a more extended form. On this subject our language is deficient in a sufficiently correct * Aguara is one of those indefinite appellations which ex- tend over a vast surface of America. It would seem to be derived from the Mexican wolf or fox, whose cry is said to repeat the sounds Agou-a-a ! but, in other places, it is a fox, a wolf, a feline animal; we have heard it even bestowed on several species of fishes. This name is given with some syl- lable before or after, or both before and after the word, and appears to be an epithet. In the East Indies the same thing oceurs, for there Beriah is a name applied both to the wolf and hyena. The Dhole appears to be in a similar predica- ment. es maast ie ī ; 7 idan Nn 92 INTRODUCTION, terminology. The French have adopted a clear dis- tinction, by naming the dog considered as a genuine wild species, wild dog (chien sauvage), and the dog run wild from a domestie state (chien maron), ma- roon dog, or more properly, perhaps, errant dog ; but as this word is again a Gallicism, it might be better to adopt a native term and call it Feral dog. The oblique position of the eyes in the wolf ma y be of some importance when compared with the domestic species; but physiologists, we apprehend, would scarcely admit a dog’s anxiety to see his master and obey his voice, as sufficient cause for the alteration. There remains only one more remark to be made upon Mr Bell’s arguments, namely, that which allows the gestation of the dog and wolf to be sixty- three days, whereas he fixes that of the jackals, according to Hunter, at fifty-nine. Now, the ex- periments conducted by Mons. F. Cuvier, breeding between two different species of jackals, showed gestation to be sixty-two ‘days; so that, in this respect, the three species may be considered equal, as they are likewise in the duration of blindness of the young litter,—jackals opening their eyes on the tenth or eleventh day, wolves and dogs between the tenth and twelfth days. We must be guarded even in drawing inferences from the conformation of the skulls of canines. A comparative series, duly authenticated, is a desidera- tum not as yet, we believe, existing in any cabinet : we know that the shades of difference gradually INTRODUCTION. 93 pass from one to the other, from the largest Trish greyhound, through wolves, dogs, jackals, and foxes, down to the zerda. Even in the wild species, the skulls of the European and American wolves differ sufficiently, if they were of dogs, to constitute two very distinct races; yet if the specimens of M. F. Cuvier can be depended upon, and that ascribed to the American wolf, in particular, be of | the species common in the United States, it is singular that, in fur, markings, and stature, there | should be almost no external distinction,* But we are not even certain when identity of origin has not been hitherto disputed, as in the case of domestic hogs. It is admitted that in the forest they occa- sionally breed with the wild boar, and that their offspring is as prolific as if it were the result of breeding from the same race. This is also known to be the fact in the mixed produce of the Chinese and European hog. We have had opportunities of seeing the Spanish and domestic breed become wild in South America and in J amaica, resuming the characters of the wild boar of Europe; even the young becoming striped, like the marcassins of France. Yet if the observations by T. C. Eyton, Esq., reported in the Proceedings of the Zoological * Several living specimens, one recently shot, many stuffed, and an immense number of skins, have been examined by us, which resembled the German wolves more nearly than the last mentioned do the Russian, of which we have seen also several specimens. ii ghia i ace A ll tn e 94 INTRODUCTION. Society, in February 1837, are correct, the vertebre of the back, loins, and sacrum differ, between the wild boar, the English and Chinese pigs, from fifteen to fourteen, from six to four, and from five to four. Even the French and English differ; so that taking the totals of vertebre, they run fifty, fifty-five, forty-nine, and the French fifty-three. Surely it is allowing too much to the semi-domestication of such animals, and denying the same to the plastic powers of creation, to prop up our artificial maxims in zoo- logy. On the contrary, we may justly suspect this to be a case of providential arrangement for a given purpose, and that there are three if not four original species (including the African) with powers to com- mix. In the wild boar of India, the hair of the tail is bristly and sagittated; in the species of Europe, it is a scanty coarse tuft, as well as in the wild breed of Jamaica. With regard to the general osteology of the Ca- nine, Cuvier admits that the bones of the wolf, the matin, and shepherd dogs, are not distinguishable. Now, where the whole anatomical character in all the species of the genus that are well known is so similar, we may with safety infer the constancy of that similarity in those but little known ; and, more- over, presume the conditions of life, generation, gestation, blindness, growth, maturity, longevity, and diseases, to correspond in the natural relation that must subsist between them. This being the case, we are reduced to admit, either that, excepting INTRODUCTION. 95 the foxes, some one species, let us say the wolf, is parent of the whole,—and therefore that the genus Canis of authors, so far as the diurnal species are con- cerned, consists of one only ; the wild and tame being alike mere varieties, produced by passing to different latitudes and longitudes of the earth, and subsisting upon different qualities of food; or we must adopt some standard of specification other than the merely anatomical method. Fixing upon certain species as typicial animals, is in itself a proper mode to serve our comparative data; but we must not mistake these types for real generical beings, the parents of different species. Nature does not recognize them, excepting perhaps in a very few cases: the more indistinct modifica- tions of her creatures are called into being to serve the inexhaustible fecundity of her adaptations, and to consume, according to their modified structures, a prescribed portion of antagonist produce, bal- lancing the circle of production and consumption so ` that nothing should be lost and nothing super- abundant. This is so obvious to all inquirers, that in our apprehension there are sufficient grounds for extending the principle to specific purposes ; and applying it to canines, induces us to presume, there | may have existed several congenerical species, pro- vided by the liberality of Nature with qualities more social and intellectual, and therefore more readily brought into subjection by man; animals whose types nevertheless are either not as yet ascertained, or which have been totally absorbed by domestica- 96 INTRODUCTION. tion.* Writers more imbued with the spirit of system than with the phenomena they have to | investigate and classify, may not assent to the pro- bability of this surmise ; but until they are better prepared with facts, the question must remain un- determined. It may be added, that whilst natu- ralists, especially in the writings of the present century, have very generally acquiesced in the doc- trine of the varieties (quasi species) of man, as descending, after the great catastrophe of the deluge, from several of the highest ranges of mountains in Asia and Africa, have nevertheless not thought that, whether they were civilized or savage, they must. have possessed dogs; and in that case, their domes- tication being of so remote a period, anterior to the present zoological distribution of terrestrial animals, we have no sufficient data to fix the filiation upon any known type or types; and should it be an- aes cows = = Sree OCB roe eee * We may quote as examples in the Ruminantia, the Gayal (Bos gaveus), the hunched oxen of India, and the common breed, perhaps even the Yak of Tartary, all breeding together ' a prolific offspring, if proper precautions are used. See these articles in Griffiths’ version of the Animal Kingdom. It may be claimed also for the domestic cat: the parent race, if we may trust the cat mummeries of Egypt, appearing to be in that country derived from Felis maniculata, while the wild cat of Europe, extending into the East of Asia, is also a progenitor, a8 well as the Tabby, apparently derived from South America. Their mixed offspring is prolific, and can we say that they are of the same species? What shall we say of the wild horses of Europe, whose remains are found in suc- cessive deposits, up to the superficial mould ? INTRODUCTION. 2 swered that dogs proceeded from the species in the ark, what becomes of the Mongolic, the Negro, and the Caucasian man, each escaping to his own moun- tains? And in what manner would this reply fix the parentage upon a wolf or a jackal only ? If domestic dogs were merely wolves modified by the influence of man’s wants, surely the curs of Mohammedan states, refused domestic care, left to roam after their own free will, and only tolerated in Asiatic cities in the capacity of scavengers, would long since have resumed some of the characters of the wolf: there has unquestionably been sufficient time for that purpose, since we find allusion made to these animals in the laws of Moses; they were then already considered unclean, for all cattle wor- ried, injured, or not killed as the law prescribed, - were ordered to be flung to them. We do not know how long before the departure of Israel dogs may have been held in the same outcast condition in Egypt, yet to this day the curs of the Levant are in no respect to be mistaken for wolves; and to render this fact still more remarkable, the zeebd abounds in every part of Western Asia, and is found on the northern borders of Egypt; he nightly visits the haunts of man, and disputes the carrion and offals with the curs of the streets. In India the case is precisely similar between the indigenous wolves (beriah) and the domestic pariahs ; the true pariah dog of India being a wild canine chiefly established in the woods along the lower ranges of the Himalaya mountains, where the wolf is likewise VOL. I. G ee Ss BA A Ernestine ied Hivadnn eRe EB Bem 98 INTRODUCTION. abundant. Yet none of these dogs have assumed its aspect ; nor have they mixed, further south, with jackals, equally numerous; nor, in the wildernesses of the western coast, with the dhole. Their several voices are not to be mistaken, and the name pariah, or rather pahariah (which it is true Europeans give to the curs of India, domesticated or half wild), denotes nevertheless a being of the mountains, one residing in the woods, and is applied by the Hindoos to a wild race of aboriginal inhabitants, as well as to wild-dogs. _ These considerations must have presented them- selves to both G. and F. Cuvier, as well as to other naturalists, for the Baron did not point out the wolf or any other wild animal as parent of the domestic races; he merely notices the greater approximation of the jackal, and inclined to one or more species being absorbed in the domestic dogs as we now find them. At least this was our impression when some of the foregoing arguments were submitted by us to provoke an opinion. Both he, and more particu- larly his brother, have pointed out the importance of studying the intellectual character or moral in- stincts of the species, as a method too much neglec- ted, and in this instance of the first importance. It may however be doubted in what. manner such an ‘inquiry could be carried on with sufficient inductive foundation, when it is considered that we have no other instance of a similar nature to guide us, and that it would embrace the estimate of gradual mo- dification by domestication, through a period of INTRODUCTION. 99 about four thousand years, or of fifteen hundred, perhaps nearly two thousand, generations.* If it were said that man alone furnishes circumstances partially similar, we would find that they would be adverse to the devised conclusions; for if there be but one original species of man, although it has undergone all and more vicissitudes than his dogs, we do not find his physical characters so greatly varied, increased, or diminished, in the sense of smelling, in the mass of the brain in growth, in the form of the ears, and quality or quantity of hair, as in the dog, when assumed to arise from a single stock. And if it were said that there are more than one original species of man, then we cannot deny the conclusion, that as these are known, when mixed, to produce prolific offspring, they would furnish a proof that separate species of canines may be in the same condition. Still, however, the mule breed between dog and wolf, reared by Count de Buffon, through four generations, leave no satisfactory re- sult; and M. F. Cuvier, in later experiments, attests that the procreative power in the descending line becomes less and less, leading to early sterility and extinction. The term mule breed, used by Buffon, be it observed, is only a repetition of the words of the ancients, and shows in all the pre-supposition. that the species were distinct. Besides, if this breed * Mr. Hodgson, however, also claims the intervention of moral qualifications in his account of Capra tharal, as being bolder and livelier than his Ovis nahoor, in opposition to the Conclusions of Colonel H. Smith’s account of sheep. a l i | l i! =) eamas aan siia i "an E aa pe eens ea, a o ea n e mame 100 k INTRODUCTION. had had other results, it would still have remained to be decided, whether a litter wholly of wolf ex- traction was capable of domesticity. The specimens hitherto reduced to familiarity, had been all bred up in confinement; those showing attachment, we believe, were, with one exception, she-wolves; and in no case were they ever sufficiently liberated to determine, whether, with all their docility, they would not have taken the road to the forest and resumed the character assigned them by Nature, on. the first favourable opportunity, or as soon as the first case of excitement appealed to their sensa- tions. We leave it to physiologists to inform us of the facts, if such there be, in the whole circle of mam- miferous animals, where the influence of man, by education and servitude, has been able to develope and combine faculties and anatomical forms so dif- ferent and opposite as we see them in different races of dogs, unless the typical species were first in pos- session of their rudiments. We do not pretend to deny a certain influence to education even on the external form, and to servitude and misery that degeneracy which will produce some corresponding decrease of size. But climate cannot have effected much difference in the growth, since the two ex- tremes are found both in hot and cold countries. Nor can food have had a material influence, since man, existing entirely on vegetables or on fish, retains all his faculties as well as when he subsists on flesh; and to a late period in the history of INTRODUCTION. 10} Europe, the fiercest dogs, such as the packs kept by the feudal nobility for boar and wolf hunting, were invariably fed on bread.* If the dog proceeded solely from one typical species, allowance being made for some modifications as above specified, all his developments would continue within the circle of powers and faculties belonging to the original type. They might diminish, but increase only in a trifling degree. We may infer, that food or climate would not truncate and widen the muzzle, nor raise the frontals, nor greatly alter the posterior branches of the lower jaw-bone, as in mastiffs.t It would scarcely have the effect, in other cases, of producing a high and slender structure, while it took away the sense of smelling and several of the best moral qua- lifications resulting from domesticity and education, as occurs in greyhounds. All these qualities appear to us indications of different types, whose combinable properties have enabled man to multiply the species of dogs into the several races his wants required. In these views we expect to have the concurrence of all sportsmen, who have studied the characters of the animals more than the books of systematic * See our own ancient books of venery ; also Le Roi Modus and the household institutions of the dukes of Burgundy ; the ancient Welsh laws, &e. + “ The deep jaw-bones of (some) domestic dogs are inde- pendent of the more general character of the family, and indicate a corresponding possession of actual physical power, as in the lion and jaguar, compared with the more insidious habits of the puma, we find a similar correspondence. Ani- mal Kingdom, in the Edinburgh Review of Nat. History. 102 INTRODUCTION. writers, and are led by inferences from their own observations, rather than by the authority of names. We know it to be the opinion of foresters and hunts- men of the north and east of Europe, men generally well educated, who live wholly in the presence of nature. We are assured it is the doctrine of the Chinese and Tartars, particularly in the notice on dogs in the treatise on hunting under the names of Id, Ist, and Kuschuk. We know from personal inquiry, that both the North and South American Indians do not doubt their dogs being of the same origin with the wild canines of their forests; and, lastly, we may appeal to inferences drawn from conversations with Baron Cuvier, and laying aside what was merely verbal, point to his text, where, bearing in mind that he made it a law not to assert as fact that which he had not verified by personal inspection, speaking of dogs as a species, he never- theless admits that “ quelques naturalistes pensent | que le chien est un loup, d’autres que c’est un chacal apprivoisé: les chiens redevenus sauvages dans des iles desertes ne ressemblent cependant ni a lun ni | a Yautre.”* He then notices the matin, a breed not ‘known in England, but approaching our great farm- yard and drover dogs, as possessing a skull most similar to that of the wolf, though the ears are drooping. Further on,t speaking of the jackal, he gays: “ c'est un animal vorace, qui chasse à la ma- nière des chiens et paroit lui ressembler plus qu’au- * Regne Animal, vol. i. p. 149. + Ib. p. 151. t INTRODUCTION. 103 cune autre espéce sauvage, par la conformation, et par la facilité de s'apprivoiser.” In conclusion, we may assume, that. man being created for higher purposes than a mere animal existence, subordinate creatures, so constituted as to be important elements of co-operation, were called into existence to further that design, and to facili- tate his intellectual advancement. Among others, that canines were endowed with faculties of a pecu- liar nature in aid of his exertions, and in compensa- tion for the physical inadequacy of his structure, to compete with the fiercer tenants of the world. How the brute creation was at first distributed, we never can ascertain ; but we may conjecture, judging from that balance which we may trace is kept up in organised matter, vegetable as well as animal, that all the classes and orders must have been co-existing from the beginning in such proportions, that none — had so decided a preponderance in either kingdom of nature as to outweigh and destroy others, or even to exceed their useful quantity. And here again we find an exception ; for to man alone it was given, in proof of his higher destinies, to violate this law for his convenience; to diminish, to exterminate whole species of animals, clear whole regions of forest, banish whole classes of plants, and supply their places by multiplying those creatures and that vege- tation necessary to his own comfort, and converting a wilderness into cultivated regions for his benefit, without disturbing the harmony of the creation ; unless in the duration of ages and in obedience to Sedalia dell ae Hea * Bae nrc in RAAT. areata ———— Í $ E | Becc Ai g 104 INTRODUCTION. other laws, whose periods of operation we are not competent to measure. . Without, therefore, recapitulating the various arguments adduced in the foregoing pages, we are inclined to believe there are sufficient data to doubt the opinion that the different races of domestic dogs are all sprung from one species, and still more that the wolf (Canis lupus, Linn.) was the sole parent in question ; on the contrary, we are inclined to lean, for the present, to the conjecture that seve- ral species, aborigine, constructed with faculties to intermix, including the wolf, the buansu, the anthus, the dingo, and the jackal, were parents of domestic dogs. That even the dhole, or a thous, may have been progenitors of the greyhound races; and that a lost or undiscovered species, allied to Canis tricolor or Hyæna venatica of Burchell, was the source of the short muzzled and strong jawed races of primi- tive mastiffs. Whatever may be thought of this opinion, thus much at least is certain, that the advances towards , forming hybrid races are always made by the domes- tic species to the wild ; and that when thus obtained, if kept to itself, and the cross breed gradually be- come sterile, it does not prevent repeated intermix- ture of one or the other, and therefore the admission of a great proportion of alien blood, which may again be crossed upon by the admission of hybrids from another source, whether it be wolf, jackal, pahariah, or dingo; and that experiments, in the form they have been hitherto made, in a different INTRODUCTION. 105 climate and in captivity, are not conclusive because they have terminated in the negative. We may add, that it is likely dogs are at least as likely as horses to be affected by impressions of former impregna- tions effected by different species, and not oblite- rated in the offspring of a subsequent homogeneous litter.* We know already enough of the kindlier moral instincts of several wild canines to render their apti- tude for domestication, during the pressure of a series of ages, not very problematical ; and if the education of some of the races nearer to the wild condition do not appear to be advanced to a great degree of tractability, we must reflect that domestic qualities are of very slow growth, as long as wild congeners exist in the same country ; and that, where man is a savage, his dog cannot be expected to be civilized. This truth is indeed of such univer- sal application, that in some measure we may deter- mine the social condition of a nation by the degree of education its dogs have acquired. If, therefore, we were to distribute the more typical races of dogs according to their apparent affinities with those wild species which we know to reside in zones of latitudes sufficiently proximate for admitting their paternity, and place the more aber- rant tribes likewise in their congenial zones, although * We refer to the case of the mare and quagga, and her subsequent foals, recorded in Surgeons’ College, London ; where the pictures of the successive foals, painted by Agape, are preserved. A SEITE I ST _ ew 106 INTRODUCTION. they be without a known prototype, we might form a system as philosophically admissible as our present knowledge will suffer, or as those already established. We might view the dogs residing nearest the arctic circle, or considered as descended from that quarter, and resembling wolves, as their offspring, more or - less modified by the conditions of their being, during a long process of ages, and their fertile intermixture with other more southern species. We might take the more aberrant forms, whose original types we want, from that point in their zones where the most vigorous race of them is known to exist; and next connect, in a similar manner, the wild and domestic species of the tropics in the Old World, and those of South America, with the group of their congeners in that part of the New. We would in this manner distinguish the large wolf-headed and long-haired species of the north from the smaller jackal-headed | tribes of the south; and find the species belonging | to the mastiff race, known to degenerate alike in | cold and hot countries, strong, numerous, and typi- | cal in central Asia ; spreading eastward into Chinese ` Tartary and westward to Great Britain,—always in temperate regions; while the long-nosed greyhound group, in the highest state of procreative vigour and serviceable activity, occupies another belt of the old continent centering in the Persian Taurus, west of Hinducoh, and spreading from China through north- ern India, Persia, and Arabia, including both sides of the Mediterranean to Morocco, and to the extre- mity of Europe. INTRODUCTION. 107 This distribution is sufficiently correct, in a gene- ral point of view, to merit consideration ; and the modifications which can be pointed out in the habi- tat may well be ascribed to the migrations of man, the necessity of administering to his wants and his pleasures, and therefore to his particular care ; which, after all, never enabled him to carry out his desires beyond the few degrees of cold and heat, one way or the other. If, then, by their conforma- tion, these animals were not invincibly debarred the faculty of breeding together and producing prolific lines of descent, we would find the great variety of races of dogs now existing completely accounted for by the demoralization they have suffered from slavery. For although the laws which bind organized beings within the prescribed limits of given ana- tomical and external consimilarities, still that power whence these laws emanated, has also shown itself in their exceptions. Exceptions that would in all probability be much more numerous, if our know- ledge was more extended and accurate. Some have been already pointed out, others are known to exist in other classes of animals, as in birds organized on a different but not an inferior plan, such as the hy- brid between different species of ducks, as well. as finches, whose offspring are equally prolific and continuous. To the objection that in this manner the difficulty of the question is avoided but not overcome, we answer, that the foregoing arguments tend at least to support the general inference, and that. we do not 108 INTRODUCTION. see how or why a difficulty should be overcome, which in itself seems to lie more in the maxims of | a system than in an invariable law of nature. Before we close the introductory view of the origin of dogs, it is proper to notice in a few words the fossil canines. Of these only one questionable species is, we believe, indicated in the older or deeper strata of ossiferous caverns; one that must have been adequate to walk the earth at a period when colossal forms of various kinds abounded. Ii is noticed by Kaup under the name of aynotherium, and stated by him to have been in size equal to a lion. It is doubtful whether a true diurnal canine of the existing zoological forms has yet been de- tected in the same assemblages of bones where the fossil hyena is found mixed with so many others. One, considered to be of a wolf, we examined in the collection taken from the cave near Torquay, but the Rev. Mr M‘Ennery stated that it was discovered on the surface of the stalagmite which covered the deeper hyzena deposit, and lay on the same floor with flint knives. Whether domestic dogs have ever been found in a fossil state, is still more ques- tionable. The Canis speleus of Goldfuss, found in the cavern of Gailenreuth, we know not under what conditions, has the muzzle shorter and the palate wider than the present wolf, and may be the most ancient representative of the family, which even in that case may not have preceded the first hunters or the later shepherds who migrated from high Asia westward ; for goats and sheep are equally wanting INTRODUCTION. 109 among ossiferous debris, or are found under ques- tionable circumstances; as if the progress of man with his flocks had been attended by wild and domestic canines, and their presence in the west was coeval.* With regard to foxes, their remains may be of a somewhat older date; but still they occur in the tertiary series, though it is stated to be the older in the Eocene of Lyell. Others were found in the gypsum of the basin of Paris, and in the quarries of Oeningen and Constance; but burrowing animals might be found below very ancient rocks, without therefore positively fixing the period of their exist- ence. It must, however, be admitted, that frag- ments of jaws of foxes were found mixed in the same red earth which contains bones of hyenas, horses, ruminants, elephants, &c. in the Oreston and other caves near Plymouth.t * The species noticed by Baron Cuvier seem to have been mere debris, from which, however, he was enabled to indicate four,—the two first from the Franconian caverns, the last from the calcariferous selenite of the vicinity of Paris; they were therefore of a coeval period with Paleotherium, and pes long to an anterior zoology ; but their characters and distinc- tions are not explicitly given. The two first mentioned, . however, belong to the latest period; one representing the characters of a wolf, may be the same as that of the Torquay deposit, the skull perhaps deserving the name of lurcher wolf ; and the other approaching the jackal, but larger than our present foxes. : + The foregoing chapter was written before we became a aware of the review of Mammalia in the Edinburgh Journal Fi of Natural History, where many considerations relating to} 110 INTRODUCTION. canines are investigated; and although the author’s object was not to question the single or plural view of the parentage of domestic dogs, and his argument occasionally seems to lean to the former opinion, yet we claim many of his facts ard reasons as confirming the latter. Want of space forbids these being reproduced here in the form of quotations, and con- densation wonld only garble and do them injustice ; we there- fore refer to the original, particularly the Nos. x. xi. and xii, THE CANINE FAMILY IN GENERAL, OR THE GENUS CANIS, (Linz.). Docs, taken in a collective sense, constitute a family of digitigrade carnivora, distinguished from all others by an uniformity of characters, which leaves no doubt respecting the limits, but renders subdivision shia more difficult, Where all the species are so nearly alike in their structure, naturalists have been compelled to adopt distinctive characters of inferior importance, and sometimes even of a trivial nature. M. Frederic Cuvier, and other acute and practised investigators, thoroughly convinced of the necessity of bringing to bear upon this question all the light that can be collected, have justly recommended the investigation of the different intellectual and sensi- tive instincts of canines, for the purpose of applying them in aid of the other means of classification and the distinction of species. But in what manner physiologists, who have advocated the intervention of man as the sole cause of the modifications dogs 112 THE CANINE FAMILY have undergone, can fix species by such aid, con- sistently with their own argument, we do not pre- tend to understand. In our view, however, which- leans, without at present adverting to wild species, towards the conclusion that the domestic may be derived from several distinct though slightly sepa- rated canines, this resource is applicable; and we intend to adopt it to the extent our information will permit. All canines, excepting in size, are surprisingly similar in osteological structure and in their whole anatomy. Even minor peculiarities are rare and evanescent. Recourse has therefore been had to the comparison of the bones of the head, where the seat of the senses was most likely to give evi- dence of different appetites, wants, and powers. But even here, the skulls of the French matin dog, the shepherd’s dog, the new Holland dingo, and the European wolf, differ less than the last mentioned does from the American wolf; and the variation that can be detected in the wild species is chiefly in the teeth being more bulky than in the domestic. In order to illustrate this fact, we here subjoin a series of views of skulls of different species and varieties of these animals, seen from above and in- profile. Some are taken from F. Cuvier’s plates, others from nature; and as it is not consistent with the plan of this work to enter into a detached anatomical discussion on the subject, the reader will, it is hoped, find sufficient evidence, even upon @ cursory inspection, to admit, that where the simi- IN GENERAL. 113 larity is so very great, the general structure of the animals cannot depart from this leading and chief organ of the whole. The principal, it will be ob- served, is detected in the relative development of the cranial chamber that holds the brain, for, in proportion to this increase of size, the instinctive and intellectual faculties are found to be augmented. In one group of domestic dogs, however, there is one bearing evidence of a much greater departure from the general similarity,—a departure leading to a strong presumption that the typical animal was taken from an aberrant species,—one more nearly approximating the hyena, and allied to Canis tricolor or pictus of authors. The group is that of the mas- tiff and our bulldog, whose structure will be exa- mined in the sequel. . : We invite the attention to the difference in the frontal line of the profiles, the relative position of the orbits, and the strength of the great carnassier molar, and it will be observed that the great Canada wolf (if it be a wolf?) is possessed of a greater development of the brain, less space for attaching the muscles of the neck and jaws, a more plain profile, and forms in general approximating the ` dingo; and therefore we think the head belongs, not to a true wolf, but to one of our group Lyciseus. In the dingo, Canis Australie, of our arrangement Chryseus Australie, we see the cerebral chamber not greatly enlarged, the molars of middle propor- tion, the incisor teeth nearly in a straight line, dif- fering from the jackal where they form a semicircle, VOL. I. H ee! THE CANINE FAMILY and all the teeth are proportionably stronger than in the dingo. i The teeth of canidæ consist, in the upper, of six incisors, two canines, and six molars on each side; of which number, three are false molars, one is the carnassier, and two are tubercular molars. In the lower jaw there are likewise six incisors, two ca- nines, and seven molars on each side; four being false molars, one carnassier, and two tubercular. Of these the incisor teeth are small, in wolves generally irregular and somewhat projecting. The canines are, on the contrary, very strong, pointed, slightly recurved, long, and those of the lower jaw clasping the upper, giving mutual support in the act of tearing animal substances. The molars are, as such, also but partially efficient, being tubercular or false, and indicating that Nature intended them only for occasional trituration of vegetable sub- stances, and more commonly for animal food. This intention is powerfully evinced in the carnassiers, both above and below, which being vertically rather flat and jagged into three points, act upon each other, in mastication, with the mixed powers of a saw, a pair of shears, and a bruiser; thus serving to cut through and splinter what the canines have torn, the false molars have prevented from coming in mass to the carnassier, and the tubercular molars finally triturate more, before it passes into the sto- mach, Here we have therefore a complete example of the adaptations in teeth furnished by Nature to effect certain ends, shewing the general but not IN GENERAL. FIS absolutely: exclusive subsistence of canines to be animal food; and this law, with its modifications, is so constant, that the nature of the food of mam- malia may be ascertained with certainty by an in- spection of the structure of the teeth alone. We may further observe from the teeth of canines, that the carnassiers and false molars effecting only a coarse imperfect division of their nutriment, the animals so constituted must have a tendency to subsist on putrescent flesh and broken bones, to gorge with more avidity than selection, and conse- quently to suffer alternately from the lethargy of indigestion and from protracted abstinence. Mr J. E. Gray has observed, respecting the milk teeth of young dogs, that the carnassier is provided with a small internal central lobe, as in other carnivora, whilst the same tooth in the permanent set always presents a large anterior lobe. In the growth of the animal, the anterior part of the jaws alone increases in length, so that the carnassier continues as near the fulcrum of the lever as before; and this precaution of Nature seems to be a further proof of her case, because, as the animals in ques- tion draw a part of their sustenance from the bones they masticate, if the principal teeth used to break them were not retained nearest the angle of the mouth, there would not be sufficient muscular power to effect that purpose. There is, however, some slight ‘variation in the teeth of the Buansa, or Canis primevus of Hodgson, in whose lower jawthe second tubercular tooth is con- 116 THE CANINE FAMILY stantly wanting; and the same difference occurs in the Canis Dukhunensis of Colonel Sykes, and in all of the species noticed as dholes. But the group of Megalotis, and several of the fur-footed canines, show, in their tuberculous teeth, that they are, par- tially at least, insectivorous. One hitherto con- sidered as the largest of the Megalotis, is, however, sufficiently distinct to constitute a sub-genus, having seven molars on each side in the upper jaw and eight in the lower. The nostrils are lunulated, with the lower angle opening out at the side: they are situated in a glandular muzzle. The erasure large, pointed, moveable, turned forwards; the tongue soft, long, thin at the edges; the pupils of the eyes are round in many species, but contract vertically, like those of cats, in others; and from this circumstance alone, the family is divided into two great branches, the former including the wolves, dogs, and jackals, and the latter the foxes.. But there are many spe- cies, especially in South America, and among the fur-footed canines, where the faculty of eliptically contracting the pupils is doubtful or imperfect ; nevertheless, from the power of excluding a propor- tion of light indicating nocturnal habits, and the round pupils an opposite propensity, they have been called diurnal and nocturnal canines; although the fox hunts by day as frequently as the wolf, and the jackal is perhaps more exclusively nocturnal than either. ; The fore-feet have five toes; the hind-feet four IN GENERAL. . 117 or five; one group alone has only four toes on all the feet. In all of them the two middle toes are longest and equal, and the two outer shorter; the fifth on the fore-feet is internal, and never reaches to the ground. Of the feet the toes only rest on the earth; the claws are not retractile, but are strong, blunt, and fit for digging the ground; the soles and- end of each toe are furnished with tubercles. Several species, both in high and low latitudes, have the soles or tubercular part of the feet covered with hair. Near the arctic circle, Nature has conferred this ; protection upon some kinds of domesticated dogs, A. and even upon the red fox. It is a sort of glove. | To which end, then, was it likewise bestowed upon — several smaller species living near or within the tropics? This question is not yet determined ; but we may surmise that the fur is of a different struc- ture, and intended to enable the possessors to ap- proach their prey without noise or concussion of the earth, of which small birds and insects are remark- ably sensible ; and, therefore, that those so provided are all to a certain extent insectivorous. Canines have two sorts of hair, an under fur of a soft woolly nature, and one of longer coarser piles forming the outer coat. The tail in general is long. and hairy, reaching below the heel to the ground, or even more. Its muscular flexibility and action furnishes some slight additions for the separation of the different groups, and most naturalists agree with Linnæus in the assertion, that in domestic dogs it 118 THE CANINE FAMILY hangs to the left; which Sonnini justly ascribes to their action of gioire: The mamme are from six to ten in ewe and their liability to vary in domestic dogs is a further indication of a plurality of original species in their constitution. The typical colours of the fur appear to be ochrey, white, and black, commonly inter- mixed, so as to form greys of different tones, or clouds, of tan or brown: the aberrant are fiery rufous and bluish ash. These colours are liable to vary according to the latitudes the species occupy, or according to the season of the year or particular race they belong to. Some true wolves and the lyciscans of America are reported to differ very considerably in the same litter, and the Lycaon pictus never occurs with the markings ae exactly alike. They are almost universally animals endowed with a prodigious delicacy in the organs of scent: their hearing is acute; the sight very good; but the senses of touching and tasting are not so per- fect: the last mentioned, in particular, taken accord- ing to human notions, is singularly at variance with delicacy, for it shows no repugnance to corrupted flesh. It is observed, even of lap-dogs, most daintily fed, that they will often forsake the savoury dishes prepared for them, to gorge upon carrion, and manifest the intense pleasure they receive by rolling upon it. Hence, perhaps, canines are not personally so IN GENERAL. 119 cleanly as animals of the cat kind. In this respect the nocturnal species, whose fur is also more close and fine, are far superior to the larger diurnal ; and the fact may serve as another distinctive indication between them. All the species drink by lapping, require water often, and turn round repeatedly before lying down. Their voice consists in howling, ‘but some bark even in a wild state; and ‘several have various intonations expressive of different feelings.* In the wild species, the females residing in cold and temperate climates are in heat during winter, and once only in the year, or even two years. Within the tropics, the period probably differs. Gestation seems to be from sixty-two to sixty-eight days ; but it may be shorter in the smaller species of hot climates, and perhaps longer in some cases.t Mons. Frederick Cuvier, whose views have been generally followed in this article, extends it to three or even three and a half months. Buffon was of the same opinion. The young amount to three, six, and even to nine and ten; they are not full grown till the second year, and longevity scarcely * The numerous experiments of Mr Tessier prove consi- f derable diversities in the gestation of some orders of animals, | but in dogs he does not allow the limits to exceed four days. See Cooper’s Tracts quoted in Buck’s Medical Jurisprudence. | + Mingit ad latus, cacat supra lapidem. Odorat anum alte- rius. This habit of smelling each other is connected with the two glands found on each side the anus, and communicating with it; they are ovoid in form, and exhale a penetrating fetid smell.— Dauberton in Sonnini. 120 THE CANINE FAMILY exceeds twenty years. The phenomena of gestation in canines demand some observations, from the number of whelps produced at a birth by animals destined to make violent exertions to obtain their daily food, and therefore not fitted to be inactive for any length of time. It appears that the young are produced in a premature condition, for they are born blind; and while they remain in this state, the foramen ovale is still open, according to the experiments attributed to Mr Edwards.* But it appears, in the work of that able observer, that he regards the blindness of the new-born animal rather as a proof that the vital action is not sufficiently energetic to generate animal heat, a process effected by the combined action of the nervous and vascular systems; and that animals born with their eyes open are more mature. But whether under these circum- stances their blood is imperfectly arterialized, or the vital energy be as yet insufficient, and consequently that if they be removed from the nest, or for any length of time from the maternal warmth, it is a fact that they soon cool down to the temperature of the surrounding atmosphere and perish. Now, the in- complete and helpless state of these animals, in their * Edwards sur la vie.—This conclusion may demand some qualification ; for we are informed by a medical officer in the Royal Navy—one of unquestioned ability and experience—- that in opening a seaman killed by a fall, the foramen ovale was found open, admitting the passage of a quill ; yet the mau had been as strong, active, and healthy, as any other person on board. t IN GENERAL. | 121 first state of existence, may be one of the many provisions of Nature to keep up the balance be- tween the carnivora and the other orders of mam- malia; for as the reproduction, in hot climates at least, may amount to two litters in the year, and each be of eight or ten, it follows that the destroyers would increase beyond measure, unless by the above and probably other precautions, a great number. perished at an early period of life ; and in this way became themselves food for other carnassier in the form of living prey, or ina corrupting state, when, at their second dentition, numbers are carried off by disease. The adults of different species, and even of the same, if disabled, are prey to others; nay, the mothers occasionally eat their own whelps ; they mutually destroy each other in their battles, and are devoured by hyenas. Nature appears to have implanted an innate hostility between the canine and feline genera. The hyena, the dhole, and other wild dogs, are alike reported to destroy all tiger-cubs they can find ; and the last mentioned in particular, enabled by their superior instinct to act in packs, and combine their attacks, are even more than a match for the most powerful of the feline. Those that perish in these conflicts only add to the repast of the survivors, and in this man- ner further the purposes of Nature. It is to this peculiar instinct, no doubt, that the desire of tigers to escape from the presence of sporting dogs, so often observed in India, is mainly to be ascribed. Of the smaller canines, the jackal still evinces the 122 THE CANINE FAMILY hostility of his family to tigers, by his unceasing pursuit of them in the night, and announcing his approach by a particular cry of warning, which for- merly was mistaken for the act of providing for the monster. The jackal does not precede, but follows at a safe distance; and at the time his note of cau- tion is uttered, no other animal is heard to respond to it; while at other times the cry of one is an- swered in every direction, by all the individuals then in hearing. The disposition to devour a slain or wounded companion, which we still see partially evinced in domestic dogs (who generally, when two are fighting, rush to the spot and join in biting the one who is worsted), is, however, modified by their social instinct ; for Dr Daniel Johnson, long resident in India, relates, that in earths of burrows (those troglodyte cities of canines usually dug by jackals), both wolves and hyenas take up their quarters without attempting to molest each other, although the openings of their mutual retreats are not far asunder. ‘There is a kind of understood confederacy between the cohabiting species, and it is probable that hostility is transferred to the next community of burrows. In the diurnal canines, part are of a middle stature and a part are small. Their structure indicates vigour and activity; the larger species, in particular, exhibit in the fore-quarters solidity and strength, and in the posterior part slenderness and speed. _ The legs are long, the neck muscular and length- ened ; the head is rather pointed, the chest deep, IN GENERAL. 123 the thighs and shoulders fleshy, and the legs ten- dinous ; the muscles appear very prominent, but the gait is not in perfect harmony with the conforma- tion. Movement with them is somewhat indecisive. The head is not carried high, nor is the look bold ; for canines in general are prudent, and become daring only when pressed by hunger. The smaller diurnal species and the foxes are pro- portionably lower on their legs than the first men- tioned. The body appears to be longer and the head more pointed. Foxes have the muzzle very much sharpened ; they carry the head between the shoulders; their forms are more rounded ; and they are naturally timid and distrustful. They hunt exclusively such creatures as have no means of defence; trust entirely to silence and cunning, unless they find themselves forced into some unfore- seen circumstance: hence they are crepuscular and nocturnal in their habits, oppose flight alone to every kind of danger, and seek retreat in their earths as quickly as possible. They are more cleanly in their persons than the diurnal canines, and their fur is almost invaviably finer and fuller. It is among canines, wild or domesticated, that the terrible disease known by the names of madness and hydrophobia solely originates. Other mam- malia may be infected by a bite, but do not seem to communicate the virus : to all who are attacked it is invariably fatal. India is greatly ravaged by the disease; hyaenas, wolves, dogs, jackals, and foxes being alike subject to the infection. In Germany 124 THE CANINE FAMILY and France, hydrophobia attacks wolves and foxes as well as the dogs; both the first mentioned are then without the fear of man, but run on in rabid ferocity, biting all living beings they can reach. In this condition mad foxes have been killed, in the middle of people assembled at market. The dogs of South America are not afflicted by hydrophobia, but they suffer from an eruptive dis- ease that has been compared to the human small- pox, and is very destructive, but never attacks the animal a second time. The disease is attended with convulsions; the beast in delirium bites at random and mechanically ; drops saliva mixed with blood, and the distemper is so extensively fatal, that in Peru it is considered as a plague. In a wild state the greater number reside in dense forests, but it would seem that those destined to become the companions of man are not so exclu- sively the tenants of the woods. The wild Canis latrans and C. anthus are examples of this fact, and | the typical race whence greyhounds have sprung | appears to owe its origin to the northern plains of Eastern Persia. Even the black wolf and the der- boun, are more tenants of mountain ranges than of forests. The large wild species of Europe do not burrow, though in India and America they still reside in retreats under ground. It is probable natural sagacity has taught them that there is no longer sufficient safety in burrows amidst the dense population of the Christian states; and numerous local names still remaining attest, at least, that they IN GENERAL. 125 formerly had their earths in Germany. Many of the - species hunt in troops; those who are permanent inhabitants of woods uniting only occasionally for that purpose, and those of the more open country keeping habitually together. They are cruel, vora- cious, lascivious, watchful, and capable of the greatest alternations of exertion and sloth. With some few exceptions in the Pacific Ocean and the antarctic region, canines are spread over the whole earth; and under all circumstances of human existence, dogs are found to be the companions of man. All, it appears, are capable of some kind of domestica- tion and of attachment. The domesticated, when suffering, yell and moan; the wild will hardly utter a ery of pain, even when in the chase they receive a severe wound, and they may be beaten to death without a groan. With excellent memories, none of the species seem to seek revenge for ill treatment, if once they have found their hostility unsuccessful, and they are treated with forbearance. It may be surmised, that since the commence- ment of history, some remarkable changes have taken place in the local diffusion of digitigrade car- nivora, in India and in Northern Asia. The wolf may be suspected to have spread farther to the south, over the plains of Hindostan; the hyena farther to the north, beyond the Ganges, to the highest mountains. This animal and the jackal seem likewise to have gained ground in Western Asia, in Palestine, and then over all Asia Minor,— where they may have partly replaced other species 126 THE CANINE FAMILY and races that have since been nearly or entirely extirpated. This opinion is strengthened by the fact, that in the Scriptures repeated allusions are made to the wolf as then existing in India; allusions inappli- cable to any other wild canine; and yet, at the present time, the animal now called the wolf in Palestine, the deeb of the Arabs,.is a far inferior species in strength; by naturalists classed among jackals, and by us referred to the particular group of Sacalius. Again, beyond Bengal, east of the Burhampootra, including the Burman empire, Siam, Pegu, and the Malay peninsula, no hyæna, wolf, fox, or jackal, is known, and, by implication, no wild species of dog may be added; a circumstance tending to the surmise, that the first mentioned advanced from the west and all the others from the north, have: not penetrated’ to this south-eastern angle of Asia, and consequently, that the primitive location of several animals, was, like man, confined to particular places.* The jackal is now found even in Europe, although neither that nor the hyzena are described by Greek writers with the knowledge which they would have evinced, had the animals been so common as they * See Crawfurd’s Embassy to Ava, and our account of Topel hyena. Indo-China is, however, possessed of seyéral species of elongated carnassiers, wholly or in part supplying the place of Canidæ. Beside the deeb of the Arabs, the zeeb is mentioned as allied to the wolf, but does not seem to be found in Palestine. IN GENERAL. 127 now are in Natolia. Canines are indicated by them under denominations which the moderns applied at random to animals now found on the spot, without comparing the notices which for a considerable pe- riod have been within reach; but it is only since numerous recent travels have been published, that an attempt may be made to clear up several obscuri- ties in the path of zoology, without ineurring the same certainty of misleading the public as for- merly. THE DIURNAL CANIDZ. THE several groups of canine animals which are provided with a circular disk or round pupa in the eyes, are, as already stated, classed under the gene- ral division of Diurnal Canide. They embrace the largest species of the family, and the most interest- ing to man; both with regard to his alliance with some, and to the ravages which others inflict upon his property. At the head of these tribes the wolves unquestionably claim the first place; because they offer the best points of comparison whereby to exa- mine the others; they are the best known in a wild state; in Europe they approximate most to the domestic races, and constitute the only group in the condition. of nature which resides alike in both con- tinents, and occupies nearly the half of the northern hemisphere. In this series we intend first to review the wolves, properly so called; whether they be regarded as mere varieties of each other, or as actu- ally distinct species. Next will be examined the groups of dycisct or wild dogs, being those which depart farther from the typical characters; and after them we intend to arrange, in successive sections, others still viewed as wild dogs, but more aberrant ; - and among which, nevertheless, there may be species directly concerned in the parentage of some races of the domestic breeds. SUB-GENUS I. CHAON. SECTION I. LUPUS. THE WOLVES. Lupus, Linn,—Sub-genus Chaon, Ham. Smith. Tae typical wolf of Europe and Asia, and the varieties belonging to this tribe in America, may be described as animals occupying the two conti- nents, from within the arctic circle on the north, to Spain, and perhaps to Morocco, on the west side of the old continent; to Syria, and beyond the Crishna, in India; and to near the isthmus of Panama in the New World. Further south, in the last mentioned part of the globe, they are replaced. by an aberrant canine, the red wolf of Cuvier ; and in the first, by hyænas, the painted lycaon or Canis pictus, and perhaps by other species not as yet fully investigated. In China, wolves abound in the pro- -vince of Xantung; but how far they are found to the south is not known. Buffon, from.the account of Adangon, asserts the existence of a powerful race of wolves in the Senegal country, hunting in com- pany with the lion; but the name is most likely applied to an hyzna, a lycaon, oF one of the red chrysean group. VOL. I. I 130 THE WOLVES. In stature and strength the wolves of Europe vary but slightly, and equal or surpass the largest and most powerful dogs. Their laniary and carni- vorous teeth are proportionably larger and stronger, the incisors distinctly trilobate, grooved within, and in general more irregular and projecting than in do- mestic canines. The eyes are placed more obliquely ; they are smaller, more distant, and apparently higher in the head; the forehead is broader and lower; the ears are pointed, smaller, and more open than in dogs ; they have the body deeper, the belly fuller, and less drawn up; the neck is more thickly fur- nished with a bristly sort of mane, which produces a turgid appearance about it; the shoulder is higher, the back sloping, the after extremities more crouch- ing and lower, and the hind-legs more bent under the body. The tail, hanging close between them, wants the flexibility of that of foxes, and the re- curved attitude of that of dogs: they walk more on the ball of the feet than dogs, the fur is coarser, and their odour is very offensive. Their whole aspect indicating vigilant malignity, fear, and cruelty, dis- tinguishes them: from the familiar species, even when in size and similarity of fur they approximate most closely. The muzzle, contracted below the eyes, is pointed ; the edge of the lips black. On the cheek there are two or more hairy warts, and the bristles of the whiskers on the lips are short. Wolves howl more frequently when the weather is about to change to wet. They grovel with the nose in the earth, instead of digging with their paws, THE WOLVES. 131 when they wish to conceal a part of their food or the droppings about their lairs. The parent wolves punish their whelps if they emit a scream of pain; they bite, maltreat, and drag them by the tail, till they have learned to bear pain in silence. Wolf- hunters commonly assert that the animal is weak m the loins, and when first put to speed, that his hind- quarters seem to waver ; "but when warmed, that he will run without halting from the district where he las been hunted, taking a direct line for some favourite cover, perhaps forty miles or more in dis- tance. On these occasions he will leap upon walls above eight feet high, cross rivers obliquely with the current, even if it be the Rhine, and never offer battle unless he be fairly turned: then he will en- deavour to cripple the opponent by hasty snaps at the fore-legs, and resume his route. The track of a wolf is readily distinguished from that of a dog by the two middle claws being close together, while in the dog they are separated; the marks, however, when the wolf is at speed, and the middle toes are separated, can be determined by the claws being deeper, and the impression more hairy ; the print is also longer and narrower, and the bail of the foot more prominent. Inferior in wily resources to the fox, the wolf is nevertheless endowed with great sagacity- His powers of scent are very delicate, his hearing acute, and his habits always cautious. The European variety is naturally a beast of the woods; those of the arctic regions and of the steppes of Russia and 132 THE WOLVES. Tartary have different manners, probably from ne- cessity, not choice. It is said that the burrows of wolves are originally the work of other species, such as bears, badgers, wolverenes, jackals, and foxes. They only fit them for their own use; and when they burrow, it is always in communities, so that not even bears can dislodge them. In France and Southern Germany, they now retreat under fallen trees, in the hollows under large and old roots, in caves, clefts of rocks, or overhanging banks, but always in the most secluded and dense covers. We have seen a wolf’s den in a hollow tree, accessible between some high roots. ; In well inhabited countries, where wolves are an ’ object of constant persecution, they never quit cover to windward; they trot along its edges until the wind of the open country comes toward them, and they can be assured by their scent that no suspicious object is in that quarter; then they advance, snuff- ing the coming vapours, and keep as much as pos- sible along hedges and brushwood to avoid detection, pushing forward in a single foray to the distance of many miles. If there be several, they keep in file, and step so nearly in each other's track, that in soft ground it would seem that only one had passed. They bound across narrow roads without leaving a foot print, or follow them on the outside. These movements are seldom begun before dusk or pro- tracted beyond daybreak. If single, the wolf will visit outhouses, enter the farm-yard, first stopping, THE WOLVES. 133 listening, snuffing up the air, smelling the ground, and springing over the threshold without touching it, When he retreats, his head is low, turned obliquely with one ear forward, the other back, his eyes burning like flame. He trots crouching, his brush obliterating the track of his feet, till at a dis- tance from the scene of depredation; when going more freely, he continues his route to cover, and as he enters it, first raises his tail and flings it up in triumph. It is said that a wolf, when pressed by hunger, and roaming around farms, will utter a single howl to entice the watch-dogs in pursuit of him. If they come out, he will flee till one is sufficiently forward to be singled out, attacked, and devoured ; but dogs in general are more cautious, and even hounds re- quire to be encouraged, or they will not follow upon the scent. During winter, when food is scarce, wolves often suffer the extremes of famine. Foiled in catching their prey, they are reduced to peel off the bark of some trees, and even to load their stomachs with clay. It is then they will rush upon danger. The French newspapers of January, 1838, contained an account of an old wolf attacking a group of seven- teen persons, wounding and disabling several, till he was struck dead with an axe. It is at that period they assemble in troops of from ten to twenty-five, and boldly enter the streets of hamlets to attack the dogs that may be out of doors; and if one of their own troop be wounded severely, the others immedi- | 134 THE WOLVES. ately devour him. At the close of the appalling famine which desolated India, now more than a quarter of a century ago, the wolves, always numer- ous and but little molested, had become so daring, that in open day they prowled through the villages, and became exclusively fond of human flesh. It was necessary to hunt them down, and to take them in traps and pitfalls. Many contrivances for this purpose exist in India, and a vast number were taken. It had often been observed in Europe, that wolves when taken in a trap lost all their courag and the same fact was likewise established in India, where single men went down into the pitfalls and bound several of them, without the least resistance. After a foray, these animals separate again, accord- ing to Buffon, as soon as they regain the woods; but in wild countries, and where they burrow, this is not the case. Capt. Williamson, in his Eastern Field Sports, relates the manner of smoking them out, and states that on one of these occasions a number of trinkets once attached to native children were dug out and recognised by the parents. Notwithstanding that numberless jackals and pariah dogs, nay tigers, prowl about the British cantonments in Northern India, wolves also roam and even burrow occasionally under the buildings of European occupants. We have been told by a relative, that one night a servant in his family, sleeping in the verandah with his head near the outer lattice, a wolf thrust his jaws between the bamboos, seized the young man by the head, and THE WOLVES. 135 made efforts to drag him through ; his cries awa-. kening the whole vicinity, the beast was compelled to quit his hold, but although encountered and struck at by many, he escaped; the man was nearly sealped and dreadfully lacerated, but recovered. Wolves, when attacking cattle or horses, are said to take them by the throat, or by the nose, ‘till they pull them down. A French farmer, however, re- lated that a horse of his, killed by a wolf the pre- ceding night, had been seized by the tail and dragged over till it fell upon the side; and on visiting the remains of it, we verified the fact of no wound appearing in front; the ham had been strung, and | the wolf had fed exclusively on the solid parts of the buttock. A similar mode of attack appeared to _ have been adopted, where a cow was the victim of an American wolf, which likewise came under our personal inspection. Sheep and lambs they actually carry off at a round pace, contriving to throw a part of the weight upon their shoulders. Capt. William- son describes a case that came under his own eyes, and where he, being on horseback, attempted to interpose, but the wolf laid down his burden and gave signs of assailing the Captain's horse ; and he being unarmed, felt the prudence of allowing him to escape with his prize. According to accounts we received from the Don — Cossacks, their horses bred wild on the steppes resist the attacks of whole troops of wolves. — The mares form circles round the foals; and the stallions, remaining outside, resolutely charge them, and gene- 13 THE WOLVES. rally repel the attack, killing one or more of the enemy. Single horses fight a wolf by striking with the fore-feet. Much of the ubiquity of the species in the north- ern hemisphere may be ascribed to its habit of fol- lowing the more collective movements of man ; for, allured by the scent of slaughter, by the numerous dead horses always left along the lines of operations of armies, wolves are known to follow in the rear to feed upon the carrion; and in India, there have been instances when they actually mixed with the train of attendants and carried off unguarded chil- dren. At other times they have attacked videties, particularly in winter. During the last campaign of the French armies in the vicinity of Vienna, the Moniteur mentioned several of the outposts thus molested, and the videttes carried off, when a dead wolf, and pieces of clothing, shewed what kind of enemy had been encountered. After the rout of the grand army in Russia, wolves of the Siberian [Yace followed the Russians through Poland and Germany to the borders of the Rhine. Specimens killed in the vicinity, and easily distinguished from j- the native breed, are still preserved in the museums of Neuwied, Frankfort, Cassel, &c. Wolves still commit such enormous depredations - on the property of the most civilized nations of con- tinental Europe, and even destroy so many human lives, that it is deeply to be regretted there are states with immense standing armies, including whole corps of riflemen, who have never thought of THE WOLVES. employing them to extirpate their common enemy 5 particularly as in times of peace their garrison duties are any thing but important. The Prussian government alone has displayed an active anxiety to at least abate the evil;* and in Switzerland, for more than two centuries, when a wolf appears, the church bells ring an alarm ; each person takes his rifle, all the dogs are out, and in a short time he is killed or driven back to Zante or Savoy. The ferocity of these animals is often of a very treacherous character. We were told by a butcher of New York that he had brought up, and believed that he had tamed, a wolf, which he kept for above two years chained in the slaughter-house, where it lived in complete superabundance of blood and offals. One night having occasion for some imple- ment which he believed was accessible in the dark, he went in without thinking of the wolf. The butcher wore a thick frieze coat, and while stooping to grope for what he wanted, he heard the chain rattle, and instantly he was struck down by the animal springing upon him. Fortunately a favourite cattle-dog had followed his master, and he rushed forward to defend him. The wolf had hold of the man’s collar, and being obliged to turn in his own defence, the butcher had time to draw a sticking- knife, with which he ripped his assailant open. — But although these examples, and others related * See, on this subject, the interesting remarks of Dr Weis- senhorn. t E THE WOLVES. by Buffon, disclose the usual disposition of wolves, yet when taken young and under judicious treat- ment, the females at least are not only tameable, but actually evince considerable attachment. It is, however, only attachment, not domesticity ; the spirit of savage nature still remains, and the whole result is no more than what has been seen effected with lions and other large feline ; although these have less natural intelligence and possess the con- sciousness of greater physical power. Monsieur Frederick Cuvier cites an instance of a wolf in whom the sentiment of affection existed m a very remarkable degree. It refers to one brought up like a dog, that became familiar with every person he was in the habit of seeing. He would follow his master, seemed to suffer from his absence, evinced entire submission, and differed not in manners from the tamest domestic dog. The master being obliged to travel, made a present of him to the Royal Menagerie at Paris. Here, shut up in his compartment, the animal remained for many weeks without exhibiting the least gaiety, and almost without eating. He gradually, however, recovered; he attached himself to his keeper, and seemed to have forgotten all his past affections, when his master returned after an absence of eighteen months. At the very first word which he pronounced, the wolf, who did not sce him in the crowd, instantly recognised him, and testified his joy by his motions and his cries, Being set at liberty, he overwhelmed his old friend with caresses, THE WOLVES. 139 just as the most attached dog would have done after a separation of a few days. Unhappily his master was obliged to quit him a second time ; and this absence was again, to the poor wolf, the cause of the most profound regret. But time allayed his grief. Three years elapsed, and the wolf was living very comfortably with a young dog which had been given to him asa companion. After this space of time, which would have been sufficient to make any dog, except that of Ulysses, forget his master, the gentleman returned again. It was evening, all was shut up, and the eyes of the animal could be of no use to him; but the voice of his beloved master was not effaced from his memory; the moment he heard it, he knew it, and answered by cries indica- tive of the most impatient desire; and when the obstacle which separated them was removed, his cries redoubled. The animal rushed forward, placed his fore-feet on the shoulders of his friend, licked every part of his face, and threatened with his teeth his very keepers who approached, and to whom an instant before he had been testifying the warmest affection. Such an enjoyment, as was to be ex- pected, was succeeded by the most cruel pain to the poor animal. Separation again was necessary, and from that instant the wolf became sad and immov- able; he refused all sustenance, pined away, his hair bristled up, as is usual with all sick animals, and at the end of eight days he was not to be known, and there was every reason to apprehend — his death. His health, however, became re-esta- 140 THE WOLVES. blished; he resumed his good condition of body and brilliant coat ; his keepers could again approach him; but he would not endure the caresses of any other person, and he answered strangers by nothing but menaces.* In this account, taken from the pen of a dis- tinguished naturalist, there is, we may fully believe, not the slightest exaggeration of the facts; but the inferences to be drawn require, nevertheless, consi- derable caution. The wolf was attached, but his attachment remained exclusive, and (for in this instance it appears that the animal was a male), if he had been allowed to go at large and follow his master like a dog, it still remains a question whether, upon the excitement of instinctive appe- tites, he would not have returned to the woods; whether, if his master being accompanied by him, had been attacked by other wolves, he would have fought in his defence; or for pure love, as Buffon relates of a hybrid she-wolf, he would not have joined in eating his protector. Wolves do not acquire their full growth till after the end of the second year. Their season of heat, in Europe and North America, is late in autumn, and the female produces from three to seven whelps at a litter. They are brought forth in * Cuvier’s Animal Kingdom, by Griffith, vol. ï. p. 342.— We have witnessed the most obstreperous fits of joy in a she- wolf at the visits of a young lady, who had never taken other interest in the animal than patting her on the head and speak- ing to her, This was also at the Jardin du Roi, at Paris. THE WOLVES. 141 holes, or under the most sheltered and impenetrable covers, where a bed of moss is gathered by the mother for their comfort and necessary warmth. The male wolves are accused of a desire to devour the whelps as long as they are blind; and the fact is well known that the females practise this unna- tural brutality if the young have been handled, or her attention or suspicion be raised by some cause which, it seems, excites in her an idea of apprehen- sion for their safety, and is manifested by so singular a mode of expression. After the eyes are open, the male wolf is no longer an object of maternal fears ; he then joins in the care of rearing the young, and in bringing partridges, moorfowl, rats, and moles to the lair; and both stages of the whelp’s existence indicate the further operation of secondary causes all in unison with those already noticed. With the growth of her progeny, the she-wolf increases in vigilance and in daring. By degrees they are led by her to drink, two or three times a day, to the nearest sequestered water. As they increase in stature, both the parents take them out to hunt. Tt is at this time that families of wolves are often seen in company skirting the vicinity of habitations. By degrees, however, the young acquire strength ; and ere the autumn ends, the male has forsaken the troop and taken to his solitary habits; the mother remaining with her litter, and often keeping together through the next winter and spring season ; it ap- 142 THE WOLVES. pearing, in Europe at least, that wolves by no means pair every autumn. The malevolent sagacity, fearful howling, and originally obtrusive pertinacity, which led the wolf to roam about the habitations of mankind, and show his sinister eyes flaming in the dark, were no doubt the cause of that mysterious power he was presumed to possess. We can trace, in the earliest institutions, poems, and history of nations, the awe they inspired. The wolf was sacred to Apollo: a she-wolf having nursed him, as another nursed Remus and Romulus. The figure of one was adored by the people of Parnassus: it was a military en- sign of the Macedonians, of the Romans, and of the Ostragoths. In the metamorphoses of the ancients, the wolf is conspicuous ; and that demons assume its shape, that sorcerers and incantators alternately pass from the human to the lupine form, is believed by the vulgar throughout Asia and Europe; slightly modified it is a common superstition in Abyssinia, and even among the Caffres. The goldfoot (wolf) is an attendant upon Odin, as he was more anciently upon Mars; and he is the type of the destroyer, under the name of Fenrir, in the twilight of the gods, when, according to Scandinavian lore, the orld shall perish, and the gods themselves will be consumed. If the Druids assumed the name of red-eared dogs, the priests of the Egyptians, Ro- mans, and several other nations, including the Blot- mannur of the north, were likewise designated as THE WOLVES. 443 wolves. Some nations of antiquity, as well as the more recent noble tribes of Goths and Saxons, claimed the names of wolves.* In the notices of wolves taken by ancient writers, it is evident there is no small confusion ; because, having no accurate system of fixed distinctions, travelling being rare and drawings not in use, authors were necessitated to adopt vulgar names, which often applied to more than one species, and thus mixed up the true wolf with wild dogs, jackals, hyznas, and even with lynxes. Copyists next con- fused the question still more, until the moderns, without much knowledge of the fauna of Eastern Europe and Western Asia, adapted names in such a manner, that subsequent investigation tends to show them wrong in by far the greater number of instances, and renders a reconsideration of the an- cient texts equally desirable and perplexing. But, although within the last forty years much informa- tion has been collected respecting the mammalia of * The Taricheutes or embalmers, and the priests of Lyco- polis, in Egypt. The “ Tertia post Idus nudos Aurora lupercos. Aspicit of Ovid, relates to the priests of Pan at the Lupercalia. The Blotmen, or sacrificers, of the Gothic nations, Wore wolf-skin wrappers in their naked and sanguinary ceremonies. The second tribe in point of dignity among the Ostragoths (as we gather from the oldest Teutonic poems) was that of the Wol- fingen. The first among the Saxons was the Whoelf ot Guelphic. 144 THE WOLVES. Asia, we are still insufficiently acquainted with several that are known to exist, to pronounce with confidence upon the names by which they may have been noticed in former ages; and as there are grounds for surmising the reality of the disappear- ance of some, which have been replaced by an in- crease of others, not so well known in antiquity, we can as yet only attempt an approximation to a better understanding of the questions at issue; and this will be attempted, though with considerable diffidence, as we proceed through the several groups of canines they may affect. In America, there are admitted species and per- manent varieties of the wolf, which we seem to look for in vain in the old continent. The difference, however, arises more from the circumstance, that ia the former they are still in a state of nature, with their characteristic qualities not as yet so broken by human civilization as has been the case in the lat- ter, where, if we search, both different species and varieties are likewise found, and even to a greater amount; but their distinctions are more obliterated by the long-continued intervention of active and civilized nations. They therefore continue to be confounded or considered as varicties of climate only; which, after all, is a very easy mode of dis- posing of every difficulty. If now, with these remarks in view, We examine the wolves of Eastern Europe and Western Asia, such as the ancients knew them, and without adverting to those of the north and west of Europe, we shall find, by refer- THE WOLVES. 145 ring to Oppian,* whose information on the subject is by far the most distinct, that he enumerates no less than five wild canines under the name of wolves. The first of these was the rofoorne (Jaculator), the darting wolf, a fleet animal, with a small body, strong limbs, large head, of a rufous colour, with round white spots on the belly, and flaming eyes. He howled terribly, and was constantly roaming about the shepherds’ flocks. The second species translators have designated by the epithets of harpagus, accipiter, and circus : because the animal practised a mode of circumvent-. _ ing its prey. This variety was the largest in body we and limbs, and also the fleetest of the whole. In colour it was silvery white, with a splendid tail, and it came forth in the dusk. During winter, when snows lay deep on the mountains, it de- scended to the plains and preyed on the goats and flocks of husbandmen. The third was the awreus or golden wolf, the most beautiful of the species, clothed in a fur of reddish golden yellow, and armed with powerful teeth, This race resided in the mountains of Cici- lian Taurus and Amanus, but was impatient of heat, and therefore lay in its rocky retreats during the canicular period. * Oppian, lib. iii. Messieurs de l'Academie of Paris, in their Memoirs, Part I., have toiled hard to show that some wolves of the ancients were lynxes ; and then named a lynx they dissected loup cervier, with an erudition and confusion of purpose apparently inherent in learned. bodies. VOL. I. K ee pm- ena ae nn 146 THE WOLVES. The fourth and fifth, acimones, and perhaps icti- nus, were smaller; with a lengthened body, strong and shaggy limbs, but having the face more pointed ; the ears, eyes, and feet more diminutive. One had the back and belly whitish and the feet dark coloured, and the other was entirely black: they hunted hares with their fur bristling on end. In referring these to the species at present known to exist in Turkey, we may take it for granted that the first mentioned is the common rufous wolf of Greece, and especially of Natolia. The second may be regarded as the hoary variety, still abundant in the north of Canada, and not unfrequent in Norway. It was a mountain race, and appears to have hunted singly, not in troops like the other. The golden species is, however, more questionable; although modern writers have followed Linnzus in applying the name to the jackal, and Gesner believed it de- signated the hyena. It is evident that the animal was larger and more formidably armed than the former; that it could not bear the heat, and was bright fulvous ; characters not applicable to jackals ; and that it was not the latter, because beauty can- not be ascribed to hyenas, who are sufficiently known, and are likewise able to bear the highest temperature without suffering. It is, therefore, only referable to the beluel of Persia, which appears to be the same as the wild dog of Beloochistan, by the ancients confounded with thos, and by the writers of the present day it should be included among the dholes. The fourth species of Oppian we are inclined to THE WOLVES. 147 refer to a canine commonly considered as a fox; but it is larger, more bulky, low on the legs, with a hoary grey fur, rather a short brush, and tawny limbs. It is still not uncommon in Turkey. In the commentary on Fracastor’s Alcon, it is added, that it was short-necked, broad at the shoulder, had small eyes, and a pointed nose. The fifth, however, is not referable to a well known species. Black foxes might exist and prey upon hares. It is possible that the derboun of the Arabian mountains, still found in Southern Syria, is meant; but the precise characters of the animal are not as yet well known. Of the wolves, properly so called, in both conti- nents, we shall now proceed to enumerate and de- scribe the existing species and varieties. We have not personally been able to detect any characteristic difference in the voice and howlings of the species in either hemisphere, but in fur they vary according to climate, or the difference of species and race. No true wolf has a white tip to the tail, excepting where albinism or the rigour of climate clothes the animal in a grisly white fur, and even then dark hairs, are commonly observable at the tip of the brush: the under fur of all is ashy. The typical livery of the group consists of various shades of tawny, more or less intermingled with black and white, causing deeper or lighter tints: the aberrant colours are black and fiery rufous. - The species re- ceding from the true wolf, and more directly assimi- lating with domestic dogs, will be considered in the sequel, THE COMMON WOLF. Lupus vulgaris. PLATE I. TuE common wolf of Western Europe is in stature from twenty-seven to twenty-nine inches at the shoulder. The general colour on the head, neck, and back, is fulvous grey; the hairs being mostly white at the root, then annulated with black, ful- vous, and white, and pointed with black. Those beneath the ears, on the neck, shoulders, and but- tocks, being considerably longer, furnish a kind of mane, which particularly protects the throat: all are hard and strong, especially about the nose and on the ears. The muzzle is black ; the sides of the cheeks and above the eyes more or less ochry, turn- ing grey with age. The upper lip and chin are white; the limbs ochry or dun, and adults have on the wrists an oblique blackish band. The French wolves are generally browner and somewhat smaller than those of Germany. White wolves occur sometimes among the races of middle Europe, but they are mere cases of albinism. The race of Russian wolves is larger, and appears more bulky and formidable from the great quantity of long coarse hair on the cheeks, gullet, and neck. THE COMMON WOLF. 149 In colour, the head, face, neck, and back is light grey; the hair being a mixture of sandy and ash ; on the nose and lips, and upon the limbs, the sandy tint predominates. The eyes are very small, and their whole aspect is peculiarly savage and sinister: The Swedish and Norwegian wolves are similar to the Russian in form, but appear heavier and deeper at the shoulder. Those towards the north are still whiter, the mixture of colour being white with a varying quantity of ashy and black ; but in winter totally white. The Alpine wolves are brownish-grey, and smaller than the French. Those of Italy, and to the east- ward towards Turkey, are fulvous, with a slight mixture of black, evidently the same as they were in ancient times, the epithet fulvous being bestowed upon them by Virgil. The wolves of Asia Minor are nearly the same in colour, but the fulvous is redder and more predo- minant. In India there are two species referred to the wolf; one not larger than a greyhound, commonly known by the name of beriah, is of a light fox- colour, inclining to dun, with a long head and ears like those of a jackal; slenderly made, but bony: The tail is long and not very hairy, The other is somewhat smaller, and belongs to our group of lyciscus. All the foregoing animals appear to be essentially tenants of woody regions. THE BLACK WOLF. Lupus lycaon. PLATE II. Tuis species is at least equal in stature to the com- mon wolf, and even stronger in the limbs and shoulders. Though likewise an occupant of woody covers, it is more exclusively found in rocky moun- tains and elevated ranges; although we doubt whe- ther the whitish variety before mentioned, as well as the harpagus of Oppian, do not in reality belong to this species. It is certainly distinct from the common, notwithstanding that it inhabits the same latitudes, for they do not mix. There are some indications of a more placable nature about the black, and of the probability that _ they would breed with domestic dogs a more pro- lific intermediate race. The variety best known is | the Pyrenean wolf, or lobo of Spain, and is entirely | black; some-have a few white hairs on the breast. They are exceedingly ferocious and shy. The Pariah is certainly the connecting link with. the jackals, but as these constitute a small group oceupying an immense surface of the old continent, _ y ~ >- OR" TESE a a = = a ee ee i ene os ge a E e 186 THE PARIAH DOG. extending to the south beyond the equinoctial line, and in their turn form the nearest approach to the nocturnal canines, it may be preferable, before they are considered, to examine another group more nearly allied to wolves, residing almost entirely in Africa, and therefore by us detached from the jackals. _ SUMATRAN CHRYSAUS. Chryseus Sumatrensis, SMITH. PLATE IX. Canis familiaris, va7.—Sumatrensis of Hardwicke. Tus is one of the smallest of the group, and is pos- sessed of characters distinct from all the known canines, being only about two feet long from nose to tail, and yet standing fourteen inches high at the shoulder. The countenance is that of a fox, the nose pointed and muzzle black; the whiskers long and black; the eye oblique; ears erect, very hairy, and more rounded than in the jackal or fox; nose and lips foxy brown, mixed with black ; tail pen- dulous, bushy, particularly in the middle, smaller at the base, and reaching to the leg joint; five toes on all the feet, the fifth being small, and a round cal- SUMATRAN CHRYSAUS. 187 losity above each; the general colour a foxy ferra- ginous red, varying to lighter shades on the belly and inside the thighs. The action of the animal, in confinement, was restless in the extreme ; and while in the presence of human beings, or if teazed, it emitted a most fetid urine. The voice was more of a cry than a bark. We place in the Chrysean group also several wild canines of the great Australian islands, which seem by their external characters to belong to this - type, although they are provided with the second tubercular molar, wanting in the former. Among these the best known is ' 1 mit) Hu ay a ed ii di THE NEW HOLLAND DINGO. Chryseus Australia. PLATE X. The Dingo of New Holland, or Canis Australasize of Authors. Tuts animal has been regarded by French natu- ralists as a feral dog, although it is unquestionably a wild species, only in a small degree reclaimed by the savage natives. The fact of being partially do- mesticated is not sufficient ground for assuming that the Dingo was introduced by human intervention ; for this argument would demand its existence in New Guinea, and include the necessity of the other . canines, the jackals of Sumatra and Java, being introduced by similar means. The wild Dingos are, however, larger and more powerful in the interior than the domestic race. In confinement they are entirely mute, neither howling, barking, nor growl- ing. When offended, they raise the hair upright, and assume a truly menacing aspect, but howl in a melancholy tone when prowling in a state of free- dom. When they attack sheep, their delight is to kill as many as they can overtake ; and their bite is so severe, that few who are wounded recover. They THE NEW HOLLAND DINGO. 189 emit a strong odour, and in fighting domestic dogs snap very severely. The number of their pups 1s equal to that of domestic dogs, littering in some hollow log, deserted ant-hill, hole, in the ground, or dense brush cover. If we may generalise a fact related by Mr Oxley, Surveyor-General of New South Wales, and re- corded in his Journal, the Dingos possess the quality of mutual attachment in a degree far exceeding all other brute animals. His words are, “ About a week ago we killed a native dog and threw his body on a small bush; in returning past the same spot to-day, we found the body removed three or four yards from the bush and the female in a dying state lying close beside it; she had apparently been there from the day the dog was killed, being so weakened and emaciated as to be unable to move on our ap- proach ; it was deemed mercy to dispatch hens? Domestic dogs falling in their power are imme- diately devoured.t They hunt in pairs or in small families of five or six, and their fierceness and acti- vity is equal to, if not more than a match for, the most powerful dogs of Europe. They possess the daring courage of the present group far superior to that of wolves, having been known to chase sport- ing dogs to the feet of their masters. One brought to England attacked and would have destroyed an ass, if he had not been prevented: another in the menagerie of Paris would fly at the bars of cages where he saw a panther, a jaguar, or a bear. Do- _*® Oxley’s Journal, &c. p. 110. + P, Cunningham, Two Years in New South Wales, AeA HEUER TORY Speen eae j 7 Si lle ct —_ ed 190 THE NEW HOLLAND DINGO. mestic dogs they seize without hesitation: yet these facts, excepting the first, relate to individuals of the reclaimed race, not larger than our shepherd's dog, or less than two feet high at the shoulder. They have the muzzle somewhat fuller, the head large ; under fur grey, covered by longer and abun- dant hair fulvous or white; the forehead, neck, back, and superior side of the tail is dark fulvous ; the sides, under part of the throat, and brush paler ; all beneath, the inside of the thighs, the legs, and nose whitish. We have seen two with the tip of the tail white, but the wild race is said to be desti- tute of that colour, and many of them are dark with shaggy hair;* they carry the tail horizon- tally, not curled, bent down when watching, and it is only partially furnished with long hair. They run, unlike dogs, with the head high, the ears erect and turned forward. The specimen at Paris could not swim. The parent race is wild all over Australia, but-an inferior breed is partially tamed by the natives, who make some use of it in hunting kangaroos and emus. The young obtained from a pair in the Zoological Gardens were all more or less spotted with white. We understand that there is a strongly marked variety or race of these dogs in Van Diemen’s Land. * A skin from the Swan River, now before us, measures 41 inches to the tail, the tail 12 inches. The fur in colour resem- bles the wolf of Asia Minor, but the eyes are very near the nose, only 34 inches distant ; the head is small for the size of the animal. One recently brought to Plymouth was as large as a tall lurcher and resembled that race in make. ‘N CHRYSEUS JAVANICUS. Canis Javanicus, DESM. PROBABLY the Asuwawa of Raffles. This species was first brought to Europe by Monsieur Lesche- naut. It is in size and proportions equal to a com- mon wolf, but the ears are smaller; the colour is fulvous brown, blackish on the back, feet, and tail. It is evidently a tenant of the woods. Messrs. F. Cuvier and Desmarets class the C. Javanicus with wolves. Its manners are still unknown. This short review of the Chrysean group, we trust, will be sufficient to make naturalists pause before they come to the gratuitous conclusion that wild diurnal canines, being neither wolves nor jackals, are necessarily feral dogs or dogs become wild, after they or their progenitors had been do- mesticated. They have been traced through Asia, Africa, and the Australian islands; and although there are clearly several very distinct species in the number, they all retain the fulvous livery, and in their wild state none assume the distinctions to ba oe Ee RE. ama e A E A ee E T aa a ri paan are . ` eects a ar aes 192 THE CHRYSEAN GROUP. which, if they were descended from wolves or jackals, they must have returned; neither do they assimilate with the Thoes of our distribution, for under that name the ancients noticed such a variety of anomalous or fabulous animals, that having al~ ready disposed of some, and others will occur among thé jackals and lychaontes, we restrict the group to those which appear to have been principally had in view by them. SECTION IV. THOUS. THE THOA WILD DOGS. Tue Thoan group represents in form the wolf on a reduced scale; being only somewhat larger than jackals, but differmg from them in manners and livery. They do not burrow, and are marked on the back by black and white colours, contrasting into lines, chequers, pencils, or stipples ; the rest of the fur being in general ochry or buff. The Thoas likewise emit little or no offensive odour, are not gregarious, and do not howl in concert; nor are they warners on the approach of the great feline, as jackals certainly are wont to do. The interme- diate position of the group is illustrated by the component species being alternately classed among wolves, jackals, and foxes. Aristotle, we think, had in view the typical species, Canis anthus (F. Cuv.), when he remarks that the Egyptian wolves were smaller than those of Greece. In Guldenstedt’s notice of jackals, he appears to confound some spe- cies of Thous with others of our group Sacalius. Mons. F. Cuvier, after remarking the difference between individuals of each section which bred to- gether in captivity, retains them in the series of his N 194 THE THOA WILD DOGS. dogs only as distinct species, but we think that in _ a late paper he has felt the necessity of forming them into more separated locations. The variegated colours on the back were most likely the cause which induced the ancients to assert that the Thos (or Chaber of Africa) was, according to Oppian, an hybrid between the wolf and panther, or between the hyena and wolf, according to Varinus; and Solinus justly named the Ethiopian wolves Thoas. All the species have the tip of the tail black, and prefer rocky sandy districts where there are bushes and water, to humid woods, We suspect the grey- hound of the desert was originally derived from a species very nearly if not actually belonging to this section. : ` THOUS ANTHUS. Canis Anthus, F. CUVIER. The Wild Dog of Egypt.—Deeb of the Natives. Tue head of this species is rather deep at the jowl : the nose full at the point ; the ears erect ; the throat and breast dirty white; the body above of a mixed falvous, white, black, and buff, producing a series of small black spots, or pencils, caused by the tips of the longer hairs being black and uniting in meshes. The woolly under fur is reddish brown, darkest on the back ; the ears are rather small; the nose, edge of the lips, and whiskers black ; lips, under cheeks white ; ridge of the nose brown; a black band passes round the neck towards the breast ; tail hairy, rather long, with a brown spot one-third down the base and a long black streak spreading down to the end; below it is buff; the black hairs shining ; lower limbs rusty brown on the outside, buff on the internal face; soles naked and black, as well as the claws. Irides brown; the female more buff in the colours. The animal from nose to tail measures about two feet six inches, the tail one foot, height at shoulder one foot four inches. 196 THOUS ANTHUS. Dr Ruppel obtained specimens about Bahar el Azrak. It is not common in Egypt. The same traveller observed a head taken from the catacombs of Syout or Lycopolis, which he concluded to be of this species. It may be also the animal the ancient Egyptians employed to typify the southern hemi- sphere, as perhaps the Syrian chaon designated the northern. Professor Kretschmer, in Ruppel’s Atlas, after remarking upon his unwillingness to view all the races of dogs as descended from one stock, al- though it be difficult, even in those the most deadedly marked and possessed of the greatest purity of descent, to decide from which of the ori- ginal species they may be derived, is nevertheless disposed to consider the Thous anthus as the abori- ginal species whence the Egyptians obtained their domestic dogs; and in support of this opinion, he appeals to the similarity existing between that species and the smaller breed of wolf-dogs (the Pomeranian dog) still abundant in the vicinity of Frankfort. But he appears to overlook this ques- tion, even if it were decided, that the mummy dogs of Egypt were embalmed from their domestic race, whether those of Lycopolis, or the wolf city, be- longed to it. The probability, we think, would be that they were entombed one degree lower down the river at Cynopolis, or the dog city, on the island opposite Eo, where Anubis was the presiding divi- nity, and the attendant priests ate their food out of the same dish with the sacred dogs. Although it is not unlikely that this race also producgd a breed THOUS ANTHUS. 197 of domestic dogs, still there is reason to believe they were a distinct species.* * It may be remarked that the Greek Lycopolis is the pre- sent Syout, and referring to the animals represented in the preenestine mosaic. The figure of a canine in a howling atti- tude occurs in the part depicting Upper Egypt or Nubia, and above it is the name SIOI'l, which agrees sufficiently with the Ethiopic plural Zybt, Azybit, a wild canine, or canines ; though not a wolf, unless the animals of that species, wild in Nubia, be classed with the wolves. Syout, or Assiout, is therefore an ancient name of Lycopolis, THE THOUS OF NUBIA, Thous variegatus, PLATE XI. Is about an inch lower at the shoulder and in other respects proportionably smaller than the last men- tioned animal. The head is rather broad, buff with black hairs on the occiput; the under fur buff and soft ; the upper coat of hard hair, buff at the roots, then black with a buff ring, and the tip again black and shining: these tips gather together on the sur- face in small pencils or patches, resembling chequer work on a buff ground ; the nose is blunt and black, thence to the eyes pale buff: the ears eight inches ten lines in height, buff on the outside, white within ; under parts dirty white ; tail rather short, chequered like the body, the tip dark. The extremities are long, the hind legs longest; all are buff-coloured ; - the feet hard, tumid, naked, and the claws blunt. This animal has the same wolfish aspect as the anthus. It resides in rocky regions, not burrowing, and feeding on small mammalia and birds. During nonage the colours are less clear, and the coarse hair prevails. In old age the woolly fur predominates, the coarse hair being more scanty, but from the nape of the neck to the tail there is a mane of shining black and considerably lengthened hair. M. Ruppel observed this species in Nubia and Upper Egypt. | THE YENLEE, OR PIED THOUS. Thous mesomelas. PLATE XII. Canis mesomelas of authors.—Yenlee of the Hottentots.— Boutevos of the Dutch Colonists —Chacal du Cap. _ Aut the canines found in a wild state to the south- ward of the line, in both hemispheres, approximate * the foxes in some of their characters or aspect. The | vied Thous is an example in point, for being some- what less in bulk than either of the former, and more vividly reddish about the sides and limbs, it has been classed with foxes, although the tail is not vulpine, and we are assured that the eyes are diur- nal. The individual we have seen alive had neither the movements nor head of a fox, and the ocular disks were always circular, while observed. Of three drawings with dimensions taken from diffe- rent individuals, one was twenty-five inches from nose to tail, the next twenty-six, the third twenty- seven. The tails varying, with the length of body, from eight inches and a half to ten and ahalf. The different locations of dog, jackal, and fox, assigned to the species by hataalisds; indicates the interme- diate ponm it should occupy; and the livery or TERA Rg lemma POE. a « 200 THE YENLEEF, OR PIED THOUS. intermixture of colours the fur exhibits, claims its place to be in the present group; and if we look to the dogs of the Bosjemen and Koranas, there may be a question, whether their descent is not, in part at least, derived from a cross with the present spe- cies. The ears of the T. mesomelas are larger than in the T. anthus ; the nose and forehead are ashy grey ; the ears rust-colour outside, whitish within; the cheeks whitish-ash and buff; from between the ears, over the back of the neck, and from thence spread- ing down each shoulder, the colour is black and white, variously intermixed ; the space narrows gra- dually to a point at the root of the tail or partially down the base: this space is composed of hair longer and harder than that of the sides, and in some specimens the white forms only pencils on the black, in others it is a succession of waves, and sometimes it forms something of a regular yet unde- scribable figure in the midst of the black. The throat and breast are whitish grey; the lower part of the shoulders, the hams, and part of the base of the tail, with the outside of the limbs, is of a lively rusty buff; the belly, furnished with long hairs, is dirty white ; the terminal half of the tail invariably black; the claws are blunt, the feet naked and hard. We are assured that this animal does not burrow, but lives among bushes and under promi- nent rocks. It is not found on the Karroo or wilderness. SENEGAL THOUS. ° Thous Senegalensis. PLATE XIII. Chacal de Senegal, F. Cuv. Tur able French naturalist, last quoted, considers the Senegal Thous to be a variety of his Canis an- thus, but an artist seeing both would hardly admit more than the approximation of the two species. The animal is at least an inch higher at the shoul- der, and several inches longer ; the ears are larger ;_ the head more dog-like; the tarsi higher ; the tail shorter, less hairy ; and the form more gaunt. The colours differ likewise; the nose and forehead are greyish-buff ; the throat and under parts white ; there is no black ring round the neck, nor the stippled arrangement of black points on the back ; . that part is buff and greyish, with four or five cloudy bars running in wavy lines downwards on each side, the space between with fainter greyish undulations; the darkest bars are on the croup, where a sixth passes down to near the hocks and upwards again towards the groin, leaving a whitish space at the buttock and in front of the thigh; the 202 SENEGAL THOUS. base and upper part of the tail is dark sepia-brown ; the long hairs beneath and towards the tip buff; the hind legs are buff, very long and slender, making the animal stand with the croup elevated, and therefore the species must be very fleet. It resides in common with the jackal on the uplands of Gam- dia and Senegal. ty THOUS TOKLA, Nomis, Tulki of the Persians, and probably the Tokla of Abyssinia, Is a larger canine than the Z. anthus, distinguished from the rest of the group by the predominance of rufous woolly hair, interspersed on the sides and covered on the back with long coarse black hairs ; the belly is snow white and the ears jet black ; the tail, rather short, is of the colour of the woolly fur, but with a patch at the root, and the tip of shining black hair. It howls with a moaning voice, and is confounded by Olearius with the common jackal. In Abyssinia the Tokla’s bite is much feared, and is evidently the same as the Toqua of the Hottentots, which the Dutch of the Cape interpret by the name of wolf, and Mr Kolbe as well as Sir J. Barrow seem to have regarded as the Lupus vulgaris. The long hair on the back of the Athiopian Lycaon of Solinus may be the black hair above mentioned, and this ridge is not singular in Africa. We shall find it again in the Megalotis faindicus, offering a counter- part to the red Aguara wolf in Tropical America. Pench ee NENTS NMEA Ne > WILD DOG OF NATOLIA. Thous acmon, SMITH. PLATE XIV. Perhaps the Schib of Syria. Tats animal has been confounded with the Turkish fox and with the jackal, and unless carefully ob- served would be mistaken for a country dog. The specimen whence our drawing was taken measured about seventeen inches at the shoulder, and was in length from nose to tail two feet eight inches; the head resembled that of a sharp-nosed vermin-dog, but the forehead is broader and flatter ; the ears small and triangular; the girth of the body and neck full; the hair of the forehead, neck, back, and sides coarse; the tail short, but the basal part had crisped hair; the remainder longer and divided into five rings, three of which were black and two rust colour; from the nostrils to beneath the eyes, and’ from thence somewhat irregularly downwards to between the fore legs, the colour was white. All the rest of the head, body, hams, sides, belly, and upper part of the fore legs, including all the coarse hair, was rufous, buff, white, and sepia, mixed into a hoary fawn-coloured grey; from the nape of the _ heck down the back, including the base of the tail, WILD DOG OF NATOLIA. . 905 the hair, forming a broad streak, stood up crisped. This appearance may be accidental, although a second specimen somewhat more rufous and larger had likewise the hair of the back standing up at the _ points.* The first was in the museum of Prague ; the second, in private hands, came from Scanderoon. A reverend friend, who resided long in Asia Minor and is well known in his literary capacity, commu- nicated to us a part of his journal where he had noted the discovery of a suspicious looking animal in a chalk quarry about six miles from Smyrna, much superior in size to a jackal, but nota wolf; he is however in doubt whether it is this species or one of the Chryseus beluel before named. The na- tives of Natolia informed him that it was likely he had seen the animal they call the Great Jackal. As the characters which Oppian assigns to his acimones appear to agree with the animal under consideration in the short neck, broad shoulders, heavy limbs, small eyes, and sharp anterior part of the head, we think the name of Acmon may be applied to distinguish it from others. We are even inclined to believe that this race of animals is intended, where the ancients relate that a kind of wolves damaged the fishing-nets of the inhabitants on the Canopian Gulf of the Palus Meotis, unless they were allowed a proportion of the produce obtained from the water by the fishermen. t * This character of tle hair seems to be in the notice of Acmon in Oppian, + Stephanus, SECTION V. SACALIUS, THE JACKALS, N ATURALISTS, searching for the name of the Jackal in the writings of the ancients, are invariably per- plexed with the obscurity of the descriptions relating to the wild canines of antiquity. Some are inclined to fancy the panther was meant, and it is likely a spotted canine was understood by that designation ; others imagined Oppian intended a jackal by his Chryseus ; and Belon and Kempfer, among the moderns, first applied Aureus, the Latin translation of ZouSoc, for the distinctive name of it, among the canines. Others, however, sought it in Zous, Thos, Thoa ; and here again all the above names are inter- mixed ; for Aristotle, after a vague notice of Thous, © finished by saying that there are two or three spe- cies ; leaving the question totally undefined.* The precise name of the animals of this group having — thus escaped distinct notice among the ancients, the modern Greeks adopted those of Squilaichi and Sakalia, one of which being an oriental adaptation, proves the absence of a national and ancient name ; * Arist. Hist. Anim., lib. ix, cap. xliv, THE JACKALS, 207 and for the same reason we apply it to the present form of minor gregarious canines.* By separating our group of Thous from the true Jackals, much confusion in the discrepancies of size, manners, and colours, is removed; and as the former are unquestionably the ancient occupants to whom the _ oldest authors refer, we find that there is no distinct proof of the Jackal or Chakal being abundant in Asia Minor during the earlier classical ages: there is not even sufficient to show the existence of the species in Western Asia before the Macedonian invasion of Persia. At the present time it is, ac- cording to Ruppel, still a stranger to Egypt; and had a creature so notoriously unpleasant been com- mon, some one of the very numerous writers of those regions would have noticed it in a manner not to be mistaken. It may be, that one of the smaller Thoes of Aristotle is the true Jackal; and he may have first obtained a knowledge of the animal by means of his correspondence in Alex- anders army. Pliny mixed it up with his Thoes; and in the Scriptures, if noticed at all, the animal is not distinguishable from other canines. Had it been common, the epithets of warner or howler, the two most striking characteristics of the group, could have hardly escaped forming similies in the Picturesque and magnificent denunciations of the * Gesner contends that Papio was the classical name of the Jackal: this word may be of barbarous origin, and it is also clear that the ancients understood a four-handed animal by it ; probably an ape or a baboon. « 308 THE JACKALS. prophets. Though it is thus overlooked, or con- founded with the Deeb (the wolf) in the Hebrew and ancient Arabic, and in the modern dialects of these tongues, the pracrits of India, and other languages from Morocco to the Burhampootra, there are at least forty names applicable to it.* The religious and military conquests of the Arabs have carried these animals into European Turkey, and to the north, in Asia, among the steppes of Southern Russia and the wilds of Tartary: similar movements may have extended it westwards, for Jackals are found in some islands of the Adriatic, Greece, Morocco, Nigritia, and southwar. in Abys- sinia and Caffraria. ‘But whether the common Jackal of Java, and the races of Borneo and Sumatra, are of the same species as the continental, * The following list may serve as a sample of these names, and the meaning several convey of King or chief bawler— Chakal, Tschakkal, Chatal, in Barbary ; Chikal, in Turkish ; Schekal, in Pers. ; Tschagal, in Kerguise ; Tschober, in Kal- muc ; Tschubbolka, in Tartaric. Waoui, or Wairi ; ben awi and alsoboo of the Bedouins denoting howler, children of howl- ing ; Phial of Indostan, imitative of its cry. Phinkar, Hindos- tance, the warner. Jaqueparil, in Bengal, or howler-dog. Alshali, Adeditach, Akabo, Alkabo, Alzaba,