28 THE BRITISH APPROACH TO POLITICS national must also be illegal. If the Prime Minister told a judge to resign, this would be called unconstitutional, and rightly, because it would be illegal, being contrary to the Act of Settle- ment. It used to be unconstitutional for the President of the Board of Trade tp sit in the House of Commons; an alteration of the kw has now made it constitutional* But it does not seem satisfactory to say that the only unconstitutional actions are those which defy the laws about the Constitution; for the word is used in everyday speech in a much wider sense. An examination of its use will help to explain the matter: If .the King expressed in public a disagreement with his Ministers, and with the majority in Parliament, this would be called unconstitutional. Such an action by the King would be an attempt to get support and power for himself against Parliament. But no one can govern legally without Parliament; so the King's act would be a first step to illegality. It is reasonable to call unconstitutional any actions which naturally lead to a breaking of the constitutional laws, as well as actions which break those laws straightaway. A Parliament which in due legal form altered the Parliament Act and prolonged its own life would be said to act unconsti- tutionally, unless, as during the War, it was the obvious wish of the people that this should be done. Here is to be found the one really important unwritten part of the Constitution—the assumption that the purpose of the Constitution is to give effect to the will of the people. So any action, however legal, may be called unconstitutional if its purpose and effect are to take power out of the hands of the people: Democracy is the unwritten basis of the Constitution. This statement is open to challenge, Britain has not been a democracy long—certainly not before the igth century. How can so recent an idea be the basis of a Constitution which is centuries old? And if democracy is to be a fundamental principle, why not private enterprise as well? At present most of the land and industry of the country is owned by private persons; this