60 THE BRITISH APPROACH TO POLITICS with advantage be differently allocated among them. Opponents of this proposal urge that the reformed Cabinet would be liable to reach decisions without taking into account the difficulties of working them out in detail, and that the concentration of power in a few hands may encourage dictatorial methods of Government. The reader can profitably reserve his judgment until the various Departments have been examined. For the question is not simply,, shall there be ten or twenty Cabinet Ministers? The smaller number would probably involve the plan of one Minister of Defence, with the Army, Navy and Air Force subordinate to him; an overhauling of the administration of Justice; and a greater degree of "economic planning" under the control of a Minister for Economic Development. Cabinet reform on these lines is most likely to be supported by those who hope to see increased Government activity in, say, economic or military matters; for then the Cabinet must either be reformed or grow unworkably large. Those who believe that economic matters are best left to Private Enterprise will be less impressed by the need for change. This illustrates a general truth about politics—that problems of machinery of Government cannot be decided "on their merits"; they must be decided with one eye on the economic needs of the time. No one can compare a lawn-mower and a sewing-machine "on their merits"—one muse first decide whether one wants to cut the grass or make a dress. Unofficial adaptations of the Constitution usually precede any avowed reform, and the Cabinet has already devised two methods of dealing with the increasing pressure of business. The first is its Secretariat, which came into existence with the 1916 decision to keep minutes. A large staff looks after the Cabinet's documents, prepares its business and collects information. The Cabinet has thus lost some of the atmosphere of an informal meeting and become more like a business committee. Secondly, it is a regular practice to appoint Cabinet Committees consisting of a few Ministers. There is a permanent Committee on financial matters, and others may be set up to deal with problems on