THE POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF GOVERNMENT 99 who are only liable for service at home. For the latter the Council works with the help of local Territorial Associations. The Air Force. When, early in this century, it appeared that flying was going to play an important part in warfare, both Navy and Army developed Air Services which were first brought under one authority during the War. Control belongs to the Air Council, presided over by the Secretary of State, with the Under-Secretary as Vice-President, They are assisted by the Chief of Air Staff and three Air Members, dealing with Personnel, Research and Supply. Connected with the Air Ministry there is also the Director of Civil Aviation, who works under the Secretary of State, but separately from the Air Council. General considerations. It will be noticed that each of these bodies is a mixture of politicians and experts. The latter cannot properly be compared with the Civil Servants of other Depart- ments; indeed, each of the Defence organisations has a Secretary who, with his assistants, performs the work of a Civil Service. In these three departments there is a real sharing of control; the First Lord and the Secretaries of State are, it is true, responsible for their Departments but they are usually far more under the influence of expert advice than other Ministers. The overwhelming importance of efficient defence makes them afraid to go against the advice of experts unless they are very sure of their ground. Further, the sailor, soldier and airman enjoy a respect from the public which is not usually given to Civil Servants. This feeling is explained partly by the feet that men of the Aimed Forces give up much of their liberty and may be called on to risk their lives in the public service. There is also a less creditable explanation; in a world still ruled largely by force and fear, the experts in force can always command respect The influence of experts is particularly noticeable in the Navy, the prestige of which, in an island country, is naturally great. The Sea Lords' opposition to plans for Disarmament in 1927 is well known, and it was partly on their advice that the Sedition Act was passed. There are two dangers in this situation.