152 THE BRITISH APPROACH TO POLITICS Debate. Committee. When the Bill has been read a second time, it is referred to a Committee. For Bills of great importance, including all Money Bills, this will be a Committee of the Whole House; other Bills go to one of the Standing Committees. Four of these, named A, B, C, D, contain between fifty and eighty Members, the parties being in the same proportion as in the House; a fifth Committee is the Scottish, containing all the v Members from Scotland and from ten to fifteen others. Members are appointed to Committees by the Committee of Selection which is set up at the beginning of each Session; it has eleven Members, six of whom are Government supporters. Committees meet in the morning, when the House is not sitting, or in the afternoon. The Scottish Committee takes all Bills relating only to Scotland; A, B, C, and D do not specialise in any one subject. However, only about two-thirds of a Committee's members are a permanent nucleus: to these twenty or so are added for each Bill, and remain with the Committee while that Bill is under consideration: so each Bill secures the attention of a certain number of specialists in its subject-matter. The Speaker appoints for each Committee a Chairman, under whose guidance the Committee examine the Bill clause by clause, sometimes consulting with the Minister who is in charge of it. The distinction between parties is not so sharp in Committee discussion as in debates in the House. There will be certain points on which the Government supporters will stand firm, but very considerable modifications are made as a result of Opposition pressure. The public often under-estimate the amount of work done by M.P.*s because they do not realise how much is done in Committee; most newspapers only report Committee work when a point of special news-value arises. The Private M.P. has, indeed, more^ opportunity of using his abilities in Committee than in the House, where much of the Debate is arranged by the Whips and the result is a foregone conclusion. It is probable that Committees could do their work more easily if they were smaller;^ this would permit an increase in the number of Committees,