250 THE BRITISH APPROACH TO POLITICS the necessary evidence may not have been obtained. A remand, i.e., a postponement of the case, is then necessary, and the prisoner will be "remanded in custody*' unless the court grants bail—i.e., lets him go on the understanding that he must forfeit a sum of money if he does not return on a fixed date. A person from whom very little money could be obtained, might be refused bail on that ground. The same problem arises when prisoners are com- mitted for trial. Not all accused realise that there is the alternative of bail, or that if bail is refused by the magistrates they can appeal to a High Court judge. In this, and in other matters, magistrates need to exercise much consideration for the rights of the accused if Injustice is to be avoided. Bail is naturally refused to those whose past record makes it likely that they will use their period of liberty to attempt flight, and to those charged with very grave crimes. Trial by jury is often referred to as one of the bulwarks of English liberty. It is, certainly, an English device, representing the compromise between the different races that make up the English people. The Norman conquerors wishing to ascertain the customs of their Saxon subjects, adopted a method that had been employed across the Channel by Prankish Kings. Yet it is not the normal method of trials four out of every five convictions are made by Courts of Summary Jurisdiction. Nor, for two-thirds of the population, can it be, as it is sometimes described, trial by one's peers; the juror's qualification excludes the poorer classes* A general accusation of class bias against juries would be quite unjustified; but prejudice and error are human failings, and the present jury system means that where they appear they are most likely to operate against the poor. Jurors, unlike judges, have jiot gone through the rigorous legal training which teaches self criticism and caution against prejudice. But the element in English justice which does most to tilt the scales against the poorer classes is its expense. If the accused is to present his case properly, he will certainly need a barrister in the High Court, and perhaps a solicitor in the lower courts. Persons