THE WORLD 381 that she had no intention of so abusing her power; foreigners might reply that, as they had no intention of injuring Britain, there was no need for her to rule the seas. In a world of Sovereign States, no State will remain, for longer than it can help, in a position where other States would be able to get the mastery over it. This explains why both sides in wars have often claimed, with equal sincerity, that they were fighting in self-defence. If it be the rule of the world that each nation should make itself secure by its own efforts, then each will require such control over economic resources and strategic positions that it menaces others. THE BALANCE OF POWER. It is not possible, then, to make a complete separation between British and world interests, since the chief British interest is the preservation of world peace, for which- the co-operation of other nations is necessary. In like manner, the interests of France, Germany, or any other State cannot be divorced from the common interest of mankind; but to Great Britain, with her dependence on trade, this truth has a special application. British statesmen have in the past pursued many different lines of foreign policy; but the impossibility of isolation has been common to all. One often-practised policy was the Balance of Power, i.e., the attempt to see that no one Power became strong enough to overwhelm the rest. As, during the i8th and I9th centuries, first France and then Germany became the greatest Continental Power, Britain looked with favour on the weaker side in the hope of restraining the stronger. By such means skilled diplomats can preserve peace for a time; but the adoption of similar tactics by all Great Powers results in a search for allies at the end of which the world is arrayed in two camps, one, if not 'both, of which is waiting for an event, such as the 1914 Serajevo assassination, which will provoke war at a time when its chances of victory are as great as they are ever likely to be. The'weakness of the Balance of Power doctrine was that it took for granted that States may and will go to war if they see