2O8 THE DUNGIAD (A)

A true character of Mr. Pope and his Writings, in a Letter to a
Friend, Anon. [Messieurs Gildon and Dennis.] Printed for S.
Popping, 1716. Price 3^.3
The Confederates, a Farce. By Joseph Gay [J. D. BrevaL] Printed
for R. Burleigh, 1717. Price is.
Remarks upon Mr. Pope's Translation of Homer, with two
Letters concerning the Windsor Forrest and the Temple of Fame.
By Mr. Dennis. Printed for E. Curl, 1717. Price is. 6d.
Satires on the Translators of Homer, Mr. P. and Mr. T. Anon.
[Bez. Morris'] 1717. Price 6d.
The Triumvirate, or a Letter from Palaemon to Gelia at Bath.
Anon. [Leonard Welsted.~\ Price is. 1718. Folio.
The Battle of Poets, a Heroic Poem. [By Tho. Cooke\ Printed for
J. Roberts. Folio. I725-2
Memoirs of Lilliput, Anon. [Mrs. Eliz. HaywoodJ] 8°. Printed
1727.
An Essay on Criticism, in Prose, by the Author of the Critical
History of England [J. Oldmixon] 8° 1728.
Gulliveriana, and Alexandriana. With an ample Preface and
Critique on Swift and Pope's Miscellanies [By Jonathan Smedley.~\
Printed for J. Roberts 8° 1728. Advertised before the publication
of the Dunciad in the Daily Journal, April 13. 1728.
Characters of the Times, or an Account of the Writings, Charac-
ters, &c. of several Gentlemen libeli'd by S— and P— in a late
Miscellany, 8° 1728. [C^-/and W—d.]*
Remarks on Mr. Pope's Rape of the Lock, in Letters to a Friend.
[By Mr. Dennis.] Written in 1714, tho5 not printed till 1728. 8°.
Th—" is Theobald. "Why Theobald, who in 1717 was friendly to Pope, should
be joined to Griffin as author, unless through malice ex post facto > is hard to say.**
—Sherbum, p. I38.>
i. <From 17350. this pamphlet was attributed to Dennis alone. It has all
the marks of his abusive style. Cf. "Testimonies of Authors", p. 12577., and
"Errata," p. 197^
G. <Pope was very mildly dealt with in this (1725) version of the poem.
In the revised version of 1729, after he had been placed in the Dmciad, Cooke
attacked Pope much more sharply.>
3. <i.e. Curll and Welsted. The names were omitted from //^ja. See A i 240
and iii 16371. In his account of this pamphlet (Curliad, p. n), Gurll states that
he refused it "upon the many Errors I perceived in it, only on a cursory View
of the Manuscript".>