THE LOGICAL STATUS OF MENTAL FACTORS 117 That difficulties, and even fallacies, may be involved in applying simple arithmetic to living personalities, I readily admit. But the objections as stated rest on a very narrow notion of what mental measurement entails; and, since none of the writers explicitly enunciates the presumable require- ments, I shall attempt to set them forth here. To measure is " to estimate (an immaterial thing, person's character, etc.) by some standard or rule." l If * etc.' may be held to cover anything that belongs to a definable class and possesses the necessary properties, whether or not it is * immaterial/ then this definition will serve for measurement in physical science as well as in psychological. Every measurement calls for an experiment. Nevertheless, measuring as such even in physical science is a mental pro- cess not a physical: it consists, not in adding the weights, but in reading the scale where the pointer points. Thus, contrary to the implications of the argument just quoted, the mere circumstance that instruments have to be used for the more exact forms of measurement does not turn it into a physical process, any more than the use of a telescope turns observation into a physical process. " C'est toujours avec nos sens que nous nous servons de nos instru- Psychologie, I, pp. 260 f. The reader may also refer to the recent Report of the British Association Committee on c Quantitative Estimates of Sensory Events' (Dundee Meeting, 1939) and the admirable Presidential Address of Dr. R. J. Bartlett at the same meeting. I should add that the above was in type before I had an opportunity of reading either of these suggestive papers, and must therefore confine my comments to footnotes. 1 Oxford Dictionary, s.v. The physicist adopts a slightly narrower definition. " Measurement is the process of assigning numbers to represent qualities: the object of measurement is to enable the powerful weapon of mathematical analysis to be applied to the subject-matter of a science " (Campbell, Physics : The Elements, p. 267). I have a mild preference for the broader definition given by the dictionary, first, because I do not hold that mathematical analysis is limited to numbers; and, secondly, because I hold that the assignment of non-numerical marks (e.g. the ' alpha minus,' * beta plus,' etc., of the Arts examiner) is also a form of measurement. The fact that his method is inexact does not prevent it from being a form of measure- ment, though the fact that it is usually very inexact makes it usually a bad form of measurement. But " in the sense understood by the man in the street, exactness has almost disappeared from the subject-matter of modern science " (Jeffreys, loc. cit., p. 214).