472 APPENDIX I to nearer -63 in the second column. In the fourth column, the first computation gave -58, the second reduced it to -556, and we guess that the third or fourth will reduce it still further to (say) -54. And so for the remaining columns. (V) yd Approximation (Table FI, c) 5. (a) Multiply each row of the original correlations once again by these readjusted weights : (-7216 X i-oo = -7216, etc., as before ; •58 X -75 = '4350 ; etc., etc.). (4) Add each column of products as before. The largest of the totals (2-1717) yields a slightly closer approximation to the factor-variance ; and once again all the totals are to be expressed as ratios of this value. Accordingly— 6. Divide each of the new totals as before by the largest in the set: (2-1717 -T- 2-1717 = i-ooo; 1-6250 -~ 2-1717 = -7483 ; etc.). The new ratios agree with the preceding to two decimal places ; and, to shorten the illustration, we may suppose that they are sufficiently exact for our purpose. We now convert the ratios into saturation coefficients. The requisite calculation is obvious when we remember that the sums of the squares of the saturations should yield the variance, which we have already ascertained. The beginner may conveniently make the calculation in two steps. 7. First normalize the ratios, so that their squares add up to unity: i.e. (a) square each ratio: (i-oooo2 = i-oooo ; -7483* = •5599 ; etc.) ; (V) add the squares : (1*0000 + "5599 ~|- . . . + -4193 = 3-1317). (c) find the square root of this total (^/S'ljl1? = 1-7697) ; (d) divide each unsquared total by this square root : (i-oooo -r 1-7697 = -5651 ; -5599 -7^1-7697 = -4229 ; etc.) ; (