LATENT ROOTS AND VECTORS 491 -r= /. Pi fa fa n — 6 ^ 0 4 3 \ „«_. T -3 3 «»»* *i I — i Analysis by Selective Operators: p. 494. (a) Canonical Expansion ofCovarianfff Matrix (sec p. 164).—The method of multiple-factor analysis described in the text is based on the assumption that any symmetric covariance (or correlation) matrix can be expressed as the sum of a number of perfect hierarchies, each of which consists of a * unit hierarchy' (Ej) multiplied by the corresponding factor- variance (0y), Such a series I call the e canonical expansion ' of the covariance (or correlation) matrix. A unit hierarchy is formed by post-multiplying a latent vector (one column of Z/) by its transpose (the same figures written as a row), according to the usual method of constructing a theoretical hierarchy. Thus, in Table IVa, El is formed from the first column of Lt (shown in Table 114), £2 from the second column, and I£% from the otiose column required to turn the semi-orthogonal Lt matrix into a completely orthogonal square matrix. From the weighted sum of these unit hierarchies we can reconstruct the original covariance matrix, R(, as shown in the table* Each of the unit hierarchies represents the effect of a single pure and independent factor; and the corresponding weighted hierarchy represents the amount of correlation or covariance attributable to that factor. (i) Factorial Expansion of Measurement Matrix (see pp. 261—5).— We can determine the contribution of such a factor to the empirical matrix of test-measurements by simply pre-multiplying that matrix by the appropriate unit hierarchy (see Table IVi). With the multipliers calculated in this way, the result is to yield, with EH the best approximation to M that is obtainable with a single factor only, namely, Ml = E^M ; with £2, the best approximation to the residuals, (M — Ma), that is obtainable with a single factor only ; and so on (the closeness of the approximation being judged by the principle of least squares), Thus, if we assume that there can be only one true factor determining the initial test-measure- ments, and that the remainder consists of errors of measurement, then M% gives the best estimate of the hypothetical values. And the same result will be readied whether we start by correlating rows or