SOLOES REFORM OF THE ATTIC STANDARD. 285 account, although that sense may sometimes seem to be rather clumsily expressed. 'A0. IIo\. c. 10. *Ei/ pev ovv TO?? vo/jioi? ravra So/re? 6eivai ?>yjfjLoriKa, *npo Se r?j$ vofjioOeffia? 7ron^<7a[t] rfy rwv %[_p"]eS[v a7rd]KOKYiv, KCU /lera ravra rv\v re rwv /Jierpwv KOL ara6fj,tov KCU r^v TOU yo/ju'oyiaTos1 av^rjaw. err' ixeivov yap iyei/ero teal ra fjierpa nelgw rwv Qe&wvei&v, KCU 07 p, v a \_cr~\ra\_6fJL\ov e/SSoju^/rovra Spa^jua? TCU? eA-aroV. fjv 8' 6 ap%cuo? j(apaKrrjp Se KCU araBpa Trpos T[O] VQ\LIG\UJL pi/as TO TaXaj/TOV dyovcra^ iced [at repels p,vaL r!a (rrarypi KOI TO?? In the first place, it is quite clear that there was a general increase in the weights all round. Contrary as this is to all our previous notions, the words camera and jLte/f to are, as Lehmann has remarked,3 in harmony with the rest of the passage, and undoubtedly authentic. Apart from this, the repetition of the article before TOV vo/i/