116 XVI DIFFERENTIAL MANIFOLDS They therefore define (16.133) a fibration (E' ® E", B, jx), and it is clear that E' ® E" is thus endowed with a vector bundle structure satisfying the condition on the sections stated above. Conversely, suppose that E' ® E" is endowed with a vector bundle structure satisfying this condition. With the notation used above, let (O be a basis of F; and «,.) a basis of F£ . Then the sections bt-xp&b, e^) (resp. b*-*(p'i (A, <,.)) form a frame (s^) (resp. ($£,)) of E' (resp. E") over Ua, and the condition on the sections shows that the $ii ® (U. n U,) x (FJ ® FJ) corresponding to the F' and u" : E" -> F" are two B-morphisms, then one shows in the same way that there exists a unique B-morphism u' ® u" : E' ® E" -> F' ® F" such that, if $' and s" are sections of E', E", respectively, over an open set U in B, and if w(j , w(J and (u' ® w")u are the restrictions of u', u" and u' ® u" to Ti'^U), Tc''""1^), and H~l(U), respectively, then we have (U' ® W'% ° («' ® SW) = («{, o $') ® (lift o $"). The restriction of u1 ® w" to a fiber (E; ® E")b = E; ® E'J is the tensor product M^ ® wj of the linear mappings u'b : E'b -> F^ and w^ : Eb ->• F'b' . If i/ and w" are B-isomorphisms, then so is u' ® u" '. The proofs of the corresponding assertions for E; ® E" are analogous and simpler. For each open U c B such that Tt'"1^) and Tc"""1^) are trivializable, F(U, E' © E") is an E" such that, with the same notation as above, Furthermore, if F is a vector bundle over B and if u' : E' -+ F and u" : E" -» F are B-morphisms, then there exists a unique B-morphism w : E' © E" -+ F ctions of the fibrations