FOUR BRITISH EMPIRES fixations regarding period of residence as might be applied to all alike; yet without any common Government or common legisla- ture, or any hindrance to full independence in internal or external affairs? The anomalies, obvious as they are, would hardly be greater than those inherent in the British Commonwealth connec- tion itself, of which, indeed, the above is virtually a description. Eire, regarded as a member of the British Commonwealth, has made a serious inroad upon the principle of the common status. She denies the common status of her ow7n nationals and those of the United Kingdom or any other part of the Commonwealth, whereas in the United Kingdom and elsewhere the common status of natural-born Irish has hitherto been upheld in theory, however differently they might be treated in practice. Under the British Nationality Bill, the United Kingdom will compromise with the Irish view, by providing that citizens of Eire wiio were hitherto British subjects can retain their British subjecthood by claiming it on certain grounds. This is obviously of expiring effect, so that eventually the two citizenships will be entirely distinct, with no common status. Yet there is now no solid reason of principle on either side why a common status—so entitled—should not be re- affirmed by agreement between the two countries. CROWN AND PEOPLE There is, of course, a reason, but it is not a solid one. As the 1930 Imperial Conference conclusions indicate, the common status is associated with the common Crown, and this is what Eire repu- diates above all else in the Commonwealth scheme of things. But although British subjecthood derives historically from the concept of common allegiance to the British Crown, the continued associa- tion of subjecthood and monarchy is a matter of form and of ter- minology rather than substance. When we think of ourselves as British subjects we are thinking primarily of our superiority to others, not of our subjection to anybody. We might indeed just as well call ourselves, like the babu of legend, 'British objects'. 'British citizens5 is as good a term as any: the traditional boast is 'avis Britannicus sum'. The concept of allegiance is not so easily disposed of. It is im- plicit in the interchange of secret information, or in the admission '75