9 itt | ull "Hl AL ee oo 5 ee CASSELL’S NATIONAL LIBRARY “HE ADVANCEMENT IF LEARNING Volumes of the New Series of CASSELL’S NATIONAL LIBRARY. With Introductions by Professor Henry Morley, L. F. Austin, A. D. Innes, Sir Henry Irving, Austin Dobson, A. T. Quiller- Couch, Tighe Hopkins, C. Lewis Hind, Neil Munro, G. K. Chesterton, Frank Mathew, Stuart J. Reid, William Archer, Herbert Paul, &c. x1.—Silas Marner—George Eliot. 2.—A Sentimental Journey—L. Sterne. 3-—Richard II].—Shakespeare. 4.-—Browning’s Poems—(Selection). 5.—On Heroes and Hero Worship— Carlyle. 6.—A Christmas Carol and the Chimes —Charles Dickens. 7.—The Vicar of Wakefield—Gold- smith. 8.—Macbeth—Shakespeare. ag Net eae Diary—(Reign of Charles ) 1o.—Johnson’s Rasselas. 1r.—The Four Georges—W. M. Thackeray. 12.—Julius Caesar—Shakespeare. 13.—Tennyson’s Poems— (Selection). 14.—The Merchant of Venice—Shake- speare. ’ : 1s.—Edgar Allan Poe's Tales—(Selec- tion). 16.—The Lady Walter Scott. 17.—Emerson’s Essays—(Selection). 18.—Hamlet—Shakespeare, ; 19.—Goldsmith’s Plays. 20.—Burns’s Poems—(Selection). 2t.—Much Ado about Nothing—Shake- speare. 22,—Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress. 23.—Sheridan's Plays: ‘‘ The Rivals” and “‘ The Schoo! for Scandal.”’ 24.—Macauiay’s Lays of Ancient Rome. 25.—Nathaniel Hawthorne's Tales. 26.—Tweltth Night—Shake.peare. 27.—Horace Walpole’s Letters—(Selec- tion). 28.—Marmion—Sir Walter Scott. 29.—The Tempest—Shakespeare. 30.—Southey’s Lite of Nelson. 31.—The Cricket on the Hearth— Charles Dickens. gt aera a 8 ip 33.—Steele and Addison’s Sir Roger de Coverley. 34.—A Midsummer-Night’s. Dream— Shakespeare. 35.—Carlyle on Uurns and Scott. 30.—Milton’s Paradise Lost—I. 37-—Milton’s Paradise Lost—II. 38.—Macaulay’s Warren Hastings. 39.—As You Like It—Shakespeare. of the Lake —Sir 40.—Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage—Lord Byron 41.—King Lear—Shakespeare. 42.—!sacon’s Essays. 43. —Utopia—Sir Thomas More. 44.—Romeo and Juliet—Shakespeare. 45.—Coimplete Angler—Isaac Walton. 46.—Haklyyt’s Discovery of Muscovy. 47.—Carlyle's Sartor Resartus. 48.—King John—Shakespeare. 49.—The Memorable Thoughts of Socrates. 50.—Burleigh, &c.—Macaulay. 51.—Burke’s Thoughts on the Present Discontents. | 52.—Tales from Boccaccio. 53.-—Henry V.—Shakespeare. 54.—Essays and Tales—Addison. 55.-—Merry Wives of Windsor—Shake- speare. 56.—Essays of Elia—Charles Lamb. 57-—Areopagitica— Milton. 58.—The Battle of Lite —CharlesDickens. 59.—V oyages and Travels— Marco Polo. 60.—-Grace Abounding—John Bunyan. 61.—The Winter’s Tale—Shakespeare. 62.—Hazlitt’s Essays. 63.—Henry VIII.—Shakespeare. 64.—Dryden’s Poems. 65.-—-Bacon’s Wisdom of the Ancients. 66.—Prometheus Unbound—Shelley. 67.—Burke’s Essays on the Sublime and Beautiful. 68.—The Comedy of Errors—Shake- speare. 69.— Wordsworth’s Poems—(Selection). 70.—-Milton’s Earlier Poems. the Decameron— 71.—Love’s Labour’s Lost—Shakespeare, — 72.—Old Age and Friendship —Cicero. 73-—The Sorrows of Werter—Goethe. 74.—Coriolanus—Shakespeare. 75.—Banquet of Plato—Shelley. 76.—Battle of the Books—Swift. 77.—Clive—Macaulay. 78.—Henry IV., Part I.—Shakespeare. 79.—Henry IV., Part II.—Shakespeare. 80.—Steele’s Essays and Tales. 81.—The Lay ot the Last Minstrel— Sir Walter Scott. 82.—Table Talk—Cowper. 83. Richard III.—Shakespeare. 84.—Advancement of Learning—Bacon. “ A new form of Messrs. Cassell’s ‘ National Library,’ which is an improvement on the old in every way, and should be a great success, — The binding in particular is both decorative and tasteful.” —A theneum. ‘The volumes are neatly bound in cloth, clearly printed, and the’ price a mere sixpence. British Classics, but none more handy or more adequate than these excellent little volumes.” —A cademy. ‘A marvel of cheapness. There is nothing so good at the price in the book market.”—Daily Mail, CASSELL & COMPANY, LIMITED, London; Faris, New York & Melbourne. a here are many series of reprints of © mE gee BACON’S MONUMENT, ST. MICHAEL’S CHURCH, ST. ALBANS. 84 |} By | FRANCIS BACON a a With an Introduction by HENRY MORLEY CASSELL AND COMPANY, LIMITED LONDON, PARIS, NEW YORK AND MELBOURNE. MCMyYy All Rights Reserved a A EO = INTRODUCTION. f 4 ~ “THE Tyvvoo Bookes of Francis Bacon. Of the pro- ficience and aduancement of Learning, divine and humane. To the King. At London. Printed for Henrie Tomes, and are to be sould at his shop at Graies Inne Gate in Holborne. 1605.” That was the original title-page of the book now in the reader’s hand—a living book that led the way to a new world of thought. It was the book in which Bacon, early in the reign of James the First, prepared the way for a full setting forth of his New Organon, or instrument of knowledge. The Organon of Aristotle was a set of treatises in which Aristotle had written the doctrine of proposi- tions. Study of these treatises was a chief occupation of young men when they passed from school to college, and proceeded from Grammar to Logic, the second of the Seven Sciences. Francis Bacon as a youth of ‘sixteen, at Trinity College, Cambridge, felt the -unfruitfulness of this method of search after truth. “He was the son of Sir Nicholas Bacon, Queen ' Elizabeth’s Lord Keeper, and was born at York House, in the Strand, on the 22nd of January, 1561. His ‘mother was the Lord Keeper’s second wife, one of two sisters, of whom the other married Sir William ‘Cecil, afterwards Lord Burleigh. Sir Nicholas Bacon 6 INTRODUCTION. had six children by his former marriage, and by his second wife two sons, Antony and Francis, of whom Antony was about two years the elder. The family home was at York Place, and at Gorhambury, near St. Albans, from which town, in its ancient and its modern style, Bacon afterwards took his titles of Verulam and St. Albans. Antony and Francis Bacon went together to Trinity College, Cambridge, when Antony was fourteen years old and Francis twelve. Francis remained at Cam- bridge only until his sixteenth year; and Dr. Rawley, his chaplain in after-years, reports of him that “ whilst he was commorant in the University, about sixteen — years of age (as his lordship hath been pleased to im- part unto myself),he first fell into dislike of the philo- sophy of Aristotle; not for the worthlessness of the author, to whom he would ascribe all high attributes, but for the unfruitfulness of the way, being a philo- sophy (as his lordship used to say) only strong for disputations and contentions, but barren of the pro-— duction of works for the benefit of the life of man; in- which mind he continued to his dying day.’ Bacon was sent as a youth of sixteen to Paris with the ambas- sador Sir Amyas Paulet, to begin his training for the publie service; but his father’s death, in February, 1579, before he had completed the provision he was making for his youngest children, obliged him to return to London, and, at the age of eighteen, to settle down at Gray’s Inn to the study of law as a profession. He was admitted to the outer bar in June, 1582, and about that time, at the age of twenty-one, wrote a INTRODUCTION. 7 sketch of his conception of a New Organon that should lead man to more fruitful knowledge, in a little Latin tract, which he called “Temporis Partus Maximus ” (‘‘ The Greatest Birth of Time”). In November, 1584, Bacon took his seat in the House of Commons as member for Meleombe Regis, in Dor- setshire. In October, 1586, he sat for Taunton. He was member afterwards for Liverpool; and he was one of those who petitioned for the speedy exeeution of Mary Queen of Scots. In October, 1589, he ob- tained the reversion of the office of Clerk of the Council in the Star Chamber, which was worth £1,600 or £2,000 a year; but for the succession to this office he had to wait until 1608. It had not yet fallen to him when he wrote his “Two Books of the Advauce- ment of Learning.” In the Parliament that met in February, 1593, Bacon sat as member for Middlesex. He raised difficulties of procedure in the way of the grant of a treble subsidy, by just objection to the joining of the Lords with the Commons in a money grant, and a desire to extend the time allowed for payment from three years to six; it was, in fact, extended to four years. The Queen was offended. Francis Bacon and his brother Antony had attached themselves to the young Earl of Essex, who was their friend and patron. The office of Attorney-General became vacant. Essex asked the Queen to appoint Francis Bacon. The Queen gave the office to Sir Edward Coke, who was already Solicitor-General, and by nine years Bacon’s senior. The office of Solicitor-General thus became vacant, and that was sought for Francis Bacon. The § INTRODUCTION. Queen, after delay and hesitation, gave it, in November, 1595, to Serjeant Fleming. The Earl of Essex con- soled his friend by giving him “a piece of land”— Twickenham Park—which Bacon afterwards sold for £1,800—equal, say, to £12,000 in present buying power. In 1597 Bacon was returned to Parliament as member for Ipswich, and in that year he was hoping to marry the rich widow of Sir William Hatton, Essex helping; but the lady married, in the next year, Sir Edward Coke. It was in 1597 that Bacon published the First Edition of his Essays. That wasa little book containing only ten essays in English, with twelve “ Meditationes Sacre,” which were essays in Latin on religious subjects. From 1597 onward to the end of his life, Bacon’s Essays were subject to continuous addition and revision. The author’s Second Edition, in which the number of the Essays was increased from ten to thirty- eight, did not appear until November or December, 1612, seven years later than these two books on the «Advancement of Learning; ” and the final edition © of the Essays, in which their number was increased _ from thirty-eight to fifty-eight, appeared only in 1625; and Bacon died on the 9th of April, 1626. The edition of the Essays published in 1597, under Elizabeth, marked only the beginning of a course of thought that afterwards flowed in one stream with his teachings in philosophy. In Febraary, 1601, there was the rebellion of Essex. Francis Bacon had separated himself from his patron after giving him advice that was disregarded. Bacon, | now Queen’s Counsel, not only appeared against his | INTRODUCTION. 9 old friend, but with excess of zeal, by which, perhaps, he hoped to win back the Queen’s favour, he twice obtruded violent attacks upon Essex when he was not called upon to speak. On the 25th of February, 1601, Essex was beheaded. The genius of Bacon was next employed to justify that act by “A Declaration of the Practices and Treasons attempted and committed by Robert late Earle of Essex and his Complices.” But James of Scotland, on whose behalf Hssex had intervened, came to the throne by the death of Eliza- beth on the 24th of March, 1603. Bacon was among the crowd of men who were made knights by James I., and he had to justify himself under the new order of things by writing “ Sir Francis Bacon his Apologie in certain Imputations concerning the late Earle of Essex.” He was returned to the first Parliament of James I. by Ipswich and St. Albans, and he was confirmed in his office of King’s Counsel in August, 1604; but he was not appointed to the office of Solicitor-General when it became vacant in that year. That was the position of Francis Bacon in 1605, when he published this work, where in his First Book he pointed out the discredits of learning from human defects of the learned, and emptiness of many of the / studies chosen, or the way of dealing with them. This _ came, he said, especially by the mistaking or misplacing of the last or furthest end of knowledge, as if there wera sought in it “a couch whereupon to rest a searching and restless spirit; or a terrace for a wandering and _ variable mind to walk up and down with a fair pros- _ pect; or a tower of state for a proud mind to raise A*—84 ~ 10 INTRODUCTION. itself upon; or a fort or commanding ground for strife and contention; or a shop for profit or sale; and not a rich storehouse for the glory of the Creator and the relief of man’s estate.” The rest of the First Book was given to an argument upon the Dignity of Learn- ing; and the Second Book, on the Advancement of Learning, is, as Bacon himself described it, “a general and faithful perambulation of learning, with an in- quiry what parts thereof lie fresh and waste, and not improved and converted by the industry of man; to the end that such a plot made and recorded to memory may both minister light to any public designation and also serve to excite voluntary endeavours.” Bacon makes, by a sort of exhaustive aualysis, a ground-plan of all subjects of study, as an intellectual map, helping the right inquirer in his search for the right path. The right path is that by which he has the best chance of adding to the stock of knowledge in the world some- thing worth labouring for; and the true worth is in labour for “the glory of the Creator and the relief of man’s estate.” H. M. THE FIRST BOOK OF FRANCIS BACON; OF THE PROFICIENCE AND ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING, DIVINE AND HUMAN, —-——-*#&«>e To the King. THERE were under the law, excellent King, both daily sacrifices and freewill offerings; the one proceeding upon ordinary observance, the other upon a devout cheerfulness: in _ like manner there belongeth to kings from their servants both _ tribute of duty and presents of affection. In the former of __ these I hope I shall not live to be wanting, according to my most humble duty and the good pleasure of your Majesty's _ employments: for the latter, I thought it more respective to _ make choice of some oblation which might rather refer to the _ propriety and excellency of your individual person, than to ' the business of your crown and state. _ Wherefore, representing your Majesty many times unto _ my mind, and beholding you not with the inquisitive eye of _ presumption, to discover that which the Scripture telleth me 4s inscrutable, but with the observant eye of duty and admira- _tion, leaving aside the other parts of your virtue and fortune, Lhave-been.touched—yea, and possessed—with. an.extreme wonder at those. your virtues and faculties, which the pbilo- Sophers call intellectual ; the-largeness of your. capacity, the faithfulness of your memory, the swiftness of your apprehen- 12 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. original notions (which by the strangeness and darkness of this tabernacle of the body are sequestered) again revived and restored: such a light of Nature I have observed in your Majesty, and such a readisiess to take flame and blaze from the least occasion presented, or the least spark of another’s know- ledge delivered. And as the Scripture saith of the wisest king, ‘*That his heart was as th: sands of the sea;” which, though it be one of the largest bodies, yet it consisteth of the smallest and finest portions; so hath God given your Majesty a com- position of understanding admirable, being able to compass and comprehend the greatest matters, and nevertheless to touch and apprehend the least ; whereas it should seem an impossibility in Nature for the same instrument to make itself fit for great and small works. And for your gift of speech, I call to mind what Cornelius Tacitus saith of Augustus Cesar : Augusto profluens, et que principem deceret, eloquentia fuit. For if we note it well, speech that is uttered with labour and difficulty, or speech that savoureth of the affectation of art and precepts, or speech that is framed after the imitation of some pattern of eloquence, though never so excellent ; all this hath somewhat servile, and holding of the subject. But your Majesty’s manner of speech is, indeed, prince-like, flowing as from a fountain, and yet streaming and branching itself into Nature’s order, full of facility and felicity, imitating none, and inimitable by any. And as in your civil estate there appeareth — to be an emulation and contention of your Majesty’s virtue with your fortune; a virtuous disposition with a fortunate regiment ; a virtuous expectation (when time was) of your greater fortune, with a prosperous possession thereof in the due time ; a virtuous observation of the laws of mairiage, with and perfection of your learning. For Iam well assured that this which I shall say is no amplification at all, but a positive and measured truth ; which is, that there hath not been since Christ’s time any king or temporal monarch which hath been so learned in all literature and erudition, divine and human. For let a man seriously and diligently revolve and jeruse the succession of the Emperors of Rome, of which Cesar the Dictator (who lived some years before Christ) avd Marcus Antoninus were the best learned, and so descend to the Emperors of Grecia, or of the West, and then to the lines of THE FIRST BOOK, 13 France, Spain, England, Scotland, daa the rest, and he shall find this judgment is truly made. * For it seemeth much ina king if, by the compendious extractions of other men’s wits and labours, he can take hold of any superficial ornaments and shows of learning, or if he countenance and prefer learning and learned men ; but to drink, indeed, of the true fountains of learning—nay, to have such a fountain of learning in him- | self, in a king, and ina king born—is almost a miracle. And the more, because there is met in your Majesty a rare conjunc- tion, as well of divine and sacred literature as of profane and human ; so as your Majesty standeth invested of that triplicity, which in great veneration was ascribed to the ancient Hermes : the power and fortune of a king, the knowledge and illumina- tion of a priest, and the learning and universality of a philo- sopher. This propriety inherent and individual attribute in your Majesty deserveth to be expressed not only in the fame and admiration of the present time, nor in the history or tradi- tion of the ages succeeding, but also in some solid work, fixed memorial, and immortal monument, bearing a character or signature both of the power of a king and the difference and - perfection of such a king. Therefore I did conclude with myself that I could not make unto your Majesty a better oblation than of some treatise tending to that end, whereof the sum will consist of these two parts: the former concerning the excellency of learning and knowledge, and the excellency of the merit and true glory in the augmentation and propagation thereof; the latter, what the particular acts and works are which have been embraced and undertaken for the advancement of learning ; and again, what defects and undervalues I find in such particular acts: to the end that though I cannot positively or affirmatively advise your Majesty, or propound unto you framed particulars, yet I may excite your princely cogitations to visit the excellent treasure of your own mind, and thence to extract particulars for this purpose agreeable to your magnanimity and wisdom. I. (1) In the entrance to the former of these—to clear the way and, as it were, to make silence, to have the true_testi- monies concerning the.dignity.of learning to be better heard, Le ~ _ in the errors and imperfections of learned men themselves. f (2) I hear the former sort say that knowledge is of those without the interruption of tacit objections—I think good to _ deliver it from the discredits and disgraces which it hath re- _ ceived, all from ignorance, but ignorance severally disguised ; *} appearing sometimes in the zeal and jealousy of divines, some- ' _ times in the severity and arrogancy of politics, and sometimes , | 14 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. things which are to be accepted of with great limitation and caution ; that the aspiring to overmuch aoe edge was the original temptation and sin whereupon ensued the fall of man; that knowledge hath in_it somewhat of the serpent, and, therefore, where it entereth into a man it makes him swell 5 Scientia inflat ; that Solomon gives a censure, ‘‘That there is no end of making books, and that much reading is weariness of the flesh;” and again in another place, ‘That in spacious knowledge there is much contristation, and that he that increaseth knowledge increaseth anxiety ;” that Saint Paul gives a caveat, ‘‘That we be not spoiled through vain philo- sophy ;” that experience demonstrates how learned men have been arch-heretics, how learned times have been inclined to atheism, and how the contemplation of second causes doth derogate from our dependence upon God, who is the first cause. (3) To discover, then, the ignorance and error of this opinion, and the misunderstanding in the grounds thereof, it may well appear these men do not observe or consider that it was not the pure knowledge of Nature and universality, a knowledge by the light whereof man did give names unto other creatures in Paradise as they were brought before him according unto © their proprieties, which gave the occasion to the fall; but it was the proud knowledge of good and evil, with an intent in man to give law unto himself, and to depend no more upon God’s commandments, which was the form of the temptation. Neither is it any quantity of knowledge, how great soever, that can make the mind of man to swell; for nothing can fill, much less extend the soul of man, but God and the contemplation of God; and, therefore, Solomon, speaking of the two principal senses of inquisition, the eye and the ear, affirmeth that the eye is never satisfied with seeing, nor the ear with hearing ; and if there be no fulness, then is the continent greater than the content: so of knowledge itself and the mind of man, whereto the senses are but reporters, he defineth likewise in these words, placed after that calendar or ephemerides which he maketh of the diversities of times and seasons for all actions and purposes, and concludeth thus : “God hath made all things beautiful, or decent, in the true return of their seasons. Also He hath placed the world in man’s heart, yet cannot man find out the work which God worketh from the beginning to the end ”—declaring not obscurely that God hath framed the mind of man as a mirror or glass, capable of the image of the universal world, and joyful to receive the impression thereof, as the eye joyeth to receive light ; and not only delighted in — beholding the variety of things and vicissitude of times, but a THE FIRST BOOK. 15 raised also to find out and discern the ordinances and decrees which throughout all those changes are infallibly observed. And although he doth insinuate that the supreme or summary law of Nature (which he calleth ‘‘ the work which God worketh from the beginning to the end”) is not possible to be found out by man, yet that doth not derogate from the capacity of the mind; but may be referred to the impediments, as of short- ness of life, ill conjunction of labours, ill tradition of know- ledge over from hand to hand, and many other inconveniences, whereunto the condition of man is subject. For that nothing parcel of the world is denied to man’s inquiry and invéntion, he doth in another place rule over, when he saith, “The spirit of man is as the lamp of God, wherewith He searcheth the inwardness of all secrets.” If, then, such be the capacity and receipt of the mind of man, it is manifest that there is no danger at all in the proportion or quantity of knowledge, how large soever, lest it should make it swell or out-compass itself ; no, but it is merely the quality of knowledge, which, be it in quantity more or less, if it be taken without the true correc- tive thereof, hath in it some nature of venom or malignity, and some effects of that venom, which is ventosity or swelling. This corrective spice, the mixture whereof maketh knowledge so sovereign, is charity, which the Apostle immediately addeth to the former clause ; for so he saith, ‘‘ Knowledge bloweth up, but charity buildeth up;” not unlike unto that which he delivereth in another place: ‘‘If I spake,” saith he, “‘ with the tongues of men and angels, and had not charity, it were but as a tinkling cymbal.” Not but that it is an excellent thing to speak with the tongues of men and angels, but because, if it be severed from charity, and not referred to the good of men and mankind, it hath rather a sounding and unworthy glory than a meriting and substantial virtue. And as for that censure of Solomon concerning the excess of writing and read- ing books, and the anxiety of spirit which redoundeth from knowledge, and that admonition of St. Paul, ‘‘ That we be not seduced by vain philosophy,” let those places be rightly understood ; and they do, indeed, excellently set forth the true bounds and limitations whereby human knowledge is ‘confined and circumscribed, and yet without any such con- tracting or coarctation, but that it may comprehend all the universal nature of things; for these limitations are three: the first, “That we do not so place our felicity in knowledge, as we forget our mortality ;” the second, ‘‘ That we make appli- cation of our knowledge, to give ourselves repose and content- | ment, and not distaste or repining ;” the third, “‘ That we do 16 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. not presume by the contemplation of Nature to attain to the mysteries of God.” For as touching the first of these, Solomon doth excellently expound himself in another place of the same book, where he saith: ‘‘I saw well that knowledge recedeth as far from ignorance as light doth from darkness; and that the wise man’s eyes keep watch in his head, whereas the fool roundeth about in darkness: but withal I learned that the same mortality involveth them both.” And for the second, certain it is there is no vexation or anxiety of mind which resulteth from knowledge otherwise than merely by accident; for all knowledge and wonder (which is the seed of knowledge) is an impression of pleasure in itself ; but when men fall to framing _ conclusions out of their knowledge, applying it to their par- ‘ ticular, and ministering to themselves thereby weak fears or vast desires, there groweth that carefulness and trouble of mind which is spoken of; for then knowledge is no more Lumen siccum, whereof Heraclitus the profound said, Lwmen siccum optima anima; but it becometh Lumen madidum, or maceratum, being steeped and infused in the humours of the affections. And as for the third point, it deserveth to be a little stood upon, and not to be lightly passed over; for if any man shall think by view and inquiry into these sensible and material things to attain that light, whereby he may reveal unto himself the nature or will of God, then, indeed, is he spoiled by vain philosophy ; for the contemplation of God’s creatures and works produceth (having regard to the works and creatures themselves) knowledge, but having regard to God no perfect knowledge, but wonder, which is broken knowledge. And, therefore, it was most aptly said by one of Plato’s school, ‘‘That the sense of man carrieth a resemblance with the sun, which (as we see) openeth and revealeth all the terrestrial globe ; but then, again, it obscureth and concealeth the stars and celestial globe : so doth the sense discover natural things, but it darkeneth and shutteth up divine.” And hence it is true that it hath proceeded, i pean _great learned men _have been heretical, whilst they have sought to fly up to the secrets of the Deity by the waxen. “wings.of-the-senses. And ~~ as forthe conceit that too much knowledge should incline a — man to atheism, and that the ignorance of second causes should make a more devout dependence upon God, which is the first cause ; first, it is good to ask the question which Job asked of his friends: *‘ Will you lie for God, as one man will do for another, to gratify him?” For certain it is that God worketh nothing i in Nature but by second causes; and if they _ would have it otherwise believed, it is mere imposture, as it — ee ee ee ee eS THE FIRST BOOK. 17 were in favour towards God, and nothing else but to offer to the Author of truth the unclean sacrifice of alie. But further, it is an assured truth, and a conclusion of experience, that a little or superficial_knowledgeof--philosophy-may-incline_the mind of man to atheism, but_a further proceeding therein. doth... bring the mitid back again to religion. For in the entrance of philosophy, Whér the’second-causesy-which are next unto the senses, do offer themselves to the mind of man, if it dwell and stay there it may induce some oblivion of the highest cause; but when a man passeth on further and seeth the dependence of causes and the works of Providence; then, rding to the allegory of the poets, hé Will 6asily believe that the highest link of Nature’s chain must needs be tied to the foot of Jupiter’s. chair. To conclude, theréfore, let no man upon a weak conceit of sobriety or an ill-applied moderation think or maintain that a man can search too far, or be too well: studied in the book of God’s word, or in the book of God’s works, divinity or philosophy ; but rather let men endeavour an endless progress or proficience in both ; only let men beware _ that they apply both to charity, and “not to swelling; to use, and not to ostentation ; afidagain; that they do not unwisely mingle or confound these learnings together. II. (1) And as for the disgraces which learning receiveth from politics, they be of this nature : that learning doth soften 1 men’s minds, “and makes them more unapt for the-honour-and exercise of arms; that it doth mar and pervert men’s disposi- tions for matter.of government and policy, in making then too curious and irresolute by variety of reading, or too peremptory or positive by strictness of rules and axioms, or too immoderate and overweening by reason of the greatness of examples, or too incompatible and differing from the times by reason of the dissimilitude of examples; or at least, that it doth divert men’s travails from action and business, and bringeth them to a love of leisure and privateness ; and that it doth bring into states a relaxation of discipline, whilst every man is more ready to argue than to obey and execute. Out of this conceit 4 Cato, surnamed the Censor, one of the wisest men indeed that 4 ever lived, when Carneades the philosopher came in embassage + to Rome, and that the young men of Rome began to flock about him, being allured with the sweetness and majesty of his eloquence and learning, gave counsel in open senate that they should give him his despatch with all speed, lest he should infect and enchant the iainds and affections of the youth, and _at unawares bring in an alteration of the manners and customs of the state. Out of the same conceit or humour did Virgil, ~ | the same ages. Neither can it otherwise be: for as in man the | ripeness Of strength of the body and mind cometh much about | an age, save that the strength of the body cometh somewhat — 18 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. turning his pen to the advantage of his country and the disadvantage of his own profession, make a kind of separation between policy and government, and between arts and sciences, in the verses so much renowned, attributing and challenging the one to the Romans, and leaving and yielding the other to the Grecians: Zu regere imperio populos, Romane, memento, He tibi erunt artes, &c. So likewise we see that Anytus, the accuser of Socrates, laid it as an article of charge and accusa- tion against him, that he did, with the variety and power of his discourses and disputations, withdraw young men from due reverence to the Jaws and customs of their country, and that he did profess a dangerous and pernicious science, which was to make the worse matter seem the better, and to suppress truth by force of eloquence and speech. (2) But these and the like imputations have rather a coun- tenance of gravity than any ground of justice : for experience doth warrant that, both in persons and in times, there hath been a meeting and concurrence in learning and arms, flourish- ing and excelling in the same men and the same ages. For as for men, there cannot be a better nor the like instance as of that pair, Alexander the Great and Julius Ozsar, the Dicéators whereof the one was Aristotle’s scholar in philosophy, and the other was Cicero’s rival in eloquence ; or if any man had rather call for scholars that were great generals, than generals that were great scholars, let him take Epaminondas the Theban, or Xenophon the Athenian ; whereof the one was the first that sbater the power of Sparta, and the other was the first that made way to the overthrow of the monarcby of Persia. And this concurrence is yet more visible in times than in persons, by how much an age is greater object than a man. For ~ both in Egypt, Assyria, Persia, Grecia, and Rome, the same ~ times that are most renowned for arms are, likewise, most — admired for learning, so that the greatest authors and philo- | sophers,.and the greatest captains and governors, have lived in the more early, so in states, arms and learning, whereof the — one correspondeth to the body, the other to the soul of man, — have a concurrence or near sequence in times. — (3) And for matter of policy and government, that learning — should rather hurt, than enable thereunto, is a thing very : improbable ; we see it is accounted an error to commit a — natural body to empiric physicians, which commonly have a — few pleasing receipts whereupon they are confident and advenr- — ss - THE FIRST BOOK, 19 turons, but know neither the causes of diseases, nor the com- plexions of patients, nor peril of accidents, nor the true method of curés; we see it is a like error to rely upon advocates or Jawyers which are only men of practice, and not grounded in’ their books, who are many times easily Surprised when matter falleth out besides their experience, to the prejudice of the causes they handle : so by like reason it cannot be but a matter of doubtful consequence if states be managed by empiric states- men, not well mingled with men grounded in learning. But contrariwise, it is almost without instance contradictory that ever any government was disastrous that was in the hands of learned governors. For howsoever it hath been ordinary with politic men to extenuate and disable learned men by the names of pedantes ; yet in the records of time it appeareth in many particulars that the governments of princes in minority (not- withstanding the infinite disadvantage of that kind of state) have nevertheless excelled the government of princes of mature age, even for that reason which they seek to traduce, which is that by that occasion the state hath been in the hands of pedantes : for so was the state of Rome for the first five years, which are so much magnified, during the minority of Nexey in the hands or Sicnece a pedanti ; so it was again, for ten years’ space or more, during the minority of Gordianus the younger, with great applause and contentation in the hands of Misitheus, a pedanti : so was it before that, in the minority of Alexander Severus, in like happiness, in hands not much unlike, by reason of the rule of the women, who were aided by the teachers and preceptors. Nay, let a man look into the government of the Bishops of Rome, as by name, into the government of Pius Quintus and Sextus Quintus in our times, who were both at their entrance esteemed but as pedantical friars, and he shall find that such Popes do greater things, and proceed upon truer principles of state, than those which have ascended to the papacy from an education and breeding in affairs of state and courts of princes; for although men bred in learning are perhaps to seek in points of convenience and accommodating for the present, which the Italians call ragioni di stato, whereof the same Pius Quintus could not hear spoken with patience, terming them inventions against religion and the moral virtues; yet on the other side, to recompense that, they are perfect in those same plain grounds of religion, justice, honour, and “moral virtue, which if they be well and watchfully pursued, there will be seldom use of those other, no more than of physic in a sound or well-dieted body. Neither can the experience ot one man’s life furnish examples and precedents for the events °0 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. of one man’s life. For as it happeneth sometimes that the grandchild, or other descendant, resembleth the ancestor more than the son; so many times occurrences of present times may sort better with ancient examples than with those of the later or immediate times; and lastly, the wit of one man can no more countervail learning than one man’s means can hold way with a common purse. (4) And as for those particular seducements or indispositions of the mind for policy and government, which learning is pretended to insinuate ; if it be granted that any such thing be, it must be remembered withal that learning ministereth in every of them greater strength of medicine or remedy than it offereth cause of indisposition or infirmity. For if by a secret operation it make men perplexed and irresolute, on the other side by plain precept it teacheth them when and upon what ground to resolve ; yea, and how.to carry things in suspense, without prejudice, till they-resolve. “Tfit make men positive and regular, it teacheth them what things are in their nature demonstrative, and what-are-conjectural, and’ as well the use of distinétions and exceptions, a8 thé latitude of principles and rules. If it mislead by disproportion or dissimilitude of examples, it teacheth men the force of circumstances, the errors of comparisons, and all the cautions of application ; so that in all these it doth rectify more effectually than it can pervert. And these medicines it conveyeth into men’s minds much more forcibly by the quickness and penetration of examples. For let a man look into the errors of Clement VILI., so lively described by Guicciardini, who served under him, or into the errors of Cicero, painted out by his own pencil in his Epistles to Atticus, and he will fly apace from being irresolute. Let him look into the errors of Phocion, and he will beware how he be obstinate or inflexible. Let him but read the fable of Ixion, and it will hold him from being vaporous or imagina- tive. Let him look into the errors of Cato IL., and he will never be one of the Antipodes, to tread opposite to the present world. (5) And for the conceit that learning should dispose men to leisure and privateness, and make men slothful : it were a strange thing if that which accustometh the mind toa perpetung motion and agitation should induce slothfulness, whereas, con- trariwise,; it maybe*truly affirmed that no kind-of men love business for itself but those that-are learned ; for other persons love it for profit, as a hireling-that loves the work for the wages; or for honour, as because it beareth them up in the eyes of men, and refresheth their reputation, which otherwise THE FIRST BOOK. 21 would wear; or because it putteth them in mind of their fortune, and giveth them occasion to pleasure and displeasure ; or because it exerciseth some faculty wherein they take pride, and soentertaineth them in good-humour and pleasing conceits towards themselves ; or because it advanceth any other their ends. So that as it is said of untrue valours, that some men’s valours are in the eyes of them that look on, so such men’s industries are in the eyes of others, or, at least, in regard of their own designments; only learned men love business as an action according to nature, as agreeable to health of mind as exercise is to health of body, taking pleasure in the action itself, and not in the purchase, so that of all men they are the most indefatigable, if it be towards any business which can hold or detain their mind. (6) And if any man be laborious in reading and study, and yet idle in business and action, it groweth from some weakness of body or softness of spirit, such as Seneca speaketh of : Quidam tam sunt umbratiles, ut putent in turbido esse quicquid in luce est ; and not of learning: well may it be that such a point of a man’s nature may make him give himself to learning, but it is not learning that breedeth any such point in his nature. (7) And that learning should take up too much time or leisure : I answer, the most active or busy man that hath been or can be, hath (no question) many vacant times of leisure while he expecteth the tides and returns of business (except he be either tedious and of no despatch, or lightly and un- worthily ambitious to meddle in things that may be better done by others), and then the question is but how those spaces and times of leisure shall be filled and spent; whether in pleasure or in studies ; as was well answered by Demosthenes to his adversary A‘schines, that was a man given to pleasure, and told him ‘‘That his orations did smell of the lamp.” **Indeed,” said Demosthenes, ‘‘there is a great difference between the things that you and I do by lamp-light.” So as no man need doubt that learning will expel business, but rather it will keep and defend the possession of the mind against idleness and pleasure, which otherwise at unawares may enter to the prejudice of both. (8) Again, for that other conceit that learning should under- mine the reverence of laws and government, it is assuredly a mere depravation and calumny, without all shadow of truth. For to say that a blind custom of obedience should be a surer obligation than duty taught and understood, it is to affirm _thata blind man may tread surer by a guide than a seeing esnisiiees aa a Sw eres 22 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. x man can by a light. And it is without all controversy that learning doth make the minds of men gentle, generous, man- ageable, and pliant to government ; whereas ignorance makes them churlish, thwart, and mutinous: and the evidence of time doth clear this assertion, considering that the most barbarous, rude, and unlearned times have been most subject to tumults, seditions, and changes. (9) And as to the judgment of Cato the Censor, he was well punished for his blasphemy against learning, in the same kind wherein he offended; for when he was past threescore years - old, he was taken with an extreme desire to go to school again, and to learn the Greek tongue, to the end to peruse the Greek authors; which doth well demonstrate that his former censure of the Grecian learning was rather an affected gravity, than according to the inward sense of his own opinion. And as for Virgil’s verses, though it pleased him to brave the world in taking to the Romans the art of empire, and leaving to others the arts of subjects, yet so much is manifest—that the Romans never ascended to that height of empire till the time they had ascended to the height of other arts. For in the time of the two first Ceesars, which had the art of government in greatest perfection, there lived the best poet, Virgilius Maro ; the best historiographer, Titus Livius; the best antiquary, Marcus Varro ; and the best or second orator, Marcus Cicero, that to the memory of man are known. As for the accusation of Socrates, the time must be remembered when it was pro- secuted ; which was under the Thirty Tyrants, the most base, bloody, and envious persons that have governed ; which revo- lution of state was no sooner over but Socrates, whom they had made a person criminal, was made a person heroical, and his memory accumulate with honours divine and, human ; and those discourses of his which were then termed corrupting of manners, were after acknowledged for sovereign medicines of the mind and manners, and so have been received ever since till this day. Let this, therefore, serve for answer to politiques, which in their humorous severity, or in their feigned gravity, have presumed to throw imputations upon learning ; which redargution nevertheless (save that we know not whether our labours may extend to other ages) were not needful for the present, in regard of the love and reverence towards learning which the example and countenance of two so learned princes, Queen Elizabeth and your Majesty, bein as Castor and Pollux, lucida sidera, stars of excellent light an most benign influence, hath wrought in all men of place and authority in our nation. THE FIRST BOOK. 23 ‘III. (1) Now therefore we come to that third sort of dis- eredit or diminution of credit. that groweth unto learning from learned men themselves, which commonly cleaveth fastest: it is either from their fortune, or from their manners, or from the nature of their studies. For the first, it is not in their power; and the second is accidental ; the third only is proper to be handled: but because we are not in hand with true measure, but with popular estimation and conceit, it is not amiss to speak somewhat of the two former. The derogations therefore which grow to learning from the fortune or condition of learned men, are either in respect of scarcity of means, or in respect of privateness of life and meanness of employ- ments. (2) Concerning want, and that it is the case of learned men usually to begin with little, and not to grow rich so fast as other men, by reason they convert not their labours chiefly to lucre and increase, it were good to leave the commonplace in commendation of povery to some friar to handle, to whom much was attributed by Machiavel in this point when he said, ‘‘ That the kingdom of the clergy had been long before at an end, if the reputation and reverence towards the poverty of friars had not borne out the scandal of the superfluities and excesses of bishops and prelates.” So aman might say that the felicity and delicacy of princes and great persons had long since turned to rudeness and barbarism, if the poverty of learning had not kept up civility and honour of life; but with- out any such advantages, it is worthy the observation what a reverent and honoured thing poverty of fortune was for some ages in the Roman state, which nevertheless was a state with- 1 out paradoxes. For we see what Titus Livius saith in his j introduction: Ceterum aut me amor negotii suscepti fallit aut nulla unguam respublica nec major, nec sanctior, nec bonis exemplis ditior fuit ; nec in quam tam sero avaritia luxuriaque aimmigraverint ; nec ubi tantus ac tam diu paupertati ac par- simonice honos fuerit. We see likewise, after that the state of Rome was not itself, but did degenerate, how that person that took’ upon him to be counsellor to Julius Czsar after his victor “where to begin his restoration of the state, maketh it of a 'points the most summary to take away the estimation of “wealth: Verum hec et omnia mala pariter cum honore pecunie desinent; si neque magistratus, neque alia vulgo cupienda, wenalia erunt. To conclude this point: as it was truly said that Rubor est virtutis color, though sometimes it come from Vice, so it may be fitly said that Paupertas est virtutis fortuna, though sometimes it may proceed from misgovernment and Y4 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. accident Surely Solomon hath pronounced it both in censure, Qui festinat ad divitias non erit nsons ; and in precept, ‘ Buy the truth, and sell it not ; and so of wisdom and knowledge ;” judging that means were to be spent upon learning, and not acdc to be applied to means. And as for the privateness or obscureness (as it may be in vulgar estimation accounted) of life of contemplative men, it is a theme so common to extol a private life, not taxed with sensuality and sloth, in comparison and to the disadvantage of a civil life, for safety, liberty, pleasure, and dignity, or at least freedom from indignity, as no man handleth it but handleth it well; such a consonancy it hath to men’s conceits in the expressing, and to men’s consents in the allowing. This only I will add, that learned men forgotten in states and not living in the eyes of men, are like the images of Cassius and Brutus in the funeral of Junia, of which, not being represented as many others were, Tacitus saith, Ko ipso prefulgebant, quod non visebantur. 3) And for meanness of employment, that which is most traduced to contempt is that the government of youth is com- monly allotted to them; which age, because it is the age of least authority, it is transferred to the disesteeming of those employments wherein youth is conversant, and which are con- versant about youth. But how unjust this traducement is (if you will reduce things from popularity of opinion to measure of reason) may appear in that we see men are more curious what they put into a new vessel than into a vessel seasoned ; and what mould they lay about a young plant than about a plant corroborate ; so as the weakest terms and times of all things use to have the best applications and helps. And will you hearken to the Hebrew rabbins? ‘‘ Your young men shall see Visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:” say they, youth is the worthier age, for that visions are nearer appari- tions of God than dreams? And let it be noted that how- soever the condition of life of pedantes hath been scorned upon theatres, as the ape of tyranny ; and that the modern looseness or negligence hath taken no due regard to the choice of school- masters and tutors; yet the ancient wisdom of the best times did always make a just complaint, that states were too bus with their laws and too negligent in point of education : which excellent part of ancient discipline hath been in some sort revived of late times by the colleges of the Jesuits; of whom, © although in regard of their superstition I may say, Quo meliores, — eo deteriores ; yet in regard of this, and some other points con- cerning human learning and moral matters, I may say, as Agesilaus said to his enemy Pharnabazus, Zalis quum sis, THE FIRST BOOK. 25 utinam noster esses. And thus much touching the discredits drawn from the fortunes of learned men. (4) As touching the manners of learned men, it is a thing personal and individual : and no doubt there be amongst them, as in other professions, of all temperatures : but yet so as it is not without truth which is said, that Abeunt studia in mores, studies have an influence and operation upon the manners of those that are conversant in them. (5) But upon an attentive and indifferent review, I for my part cannot find any disgrace to learning can proceed from the manners of learned men; not inherent to them as they are learned ; except it be a fault (which was the supposed fault of Demosthenes, Cicero, Cato II., Seneca, and many more) that because the times they read of are commonly better than the times they live in, and the duties taught better than the duties practised, they contend sometimes too far to bring things to perfection, and to reduce the corruption of manners to honesty of precepts or examples of too great height. And yet hereof they have caveats enough in their own walks. For Solon, when he was asked whether he had given his citizens the best laws, answered wisely, ‘‘ Yea, of such as they would receive :” and Plato, finding that his own heart could not agree with the corrupt manners of his country, refused to bear place or office, saying, ‘‘ That a man’s country was to be used as his parents were, that is, with humble persuasions, and not with ‘| contestations.” And Cesar’s counsellor put in the same a caveat, Non ad vetera instituta revocans que jampridem cor- 4 ruptis moribus ludibrio sunt; and Cicero noteth this error ll 4 directly in Cato II. when he writes to his friend Atticus, Cato Il § optime sentit, sed nocet interdum reipublice ; loquitur enim j, | tanquam in republicd Platonis, non tanquam in face Romuli. i 1 And the same Cicero doth excuse and expound the philoso- - 4 phers for going too far and being too exact in their prescripts ot | when he saith, [ste ipst preceptores virtutis et magistri videntur et | fines officiorum paulo longius quam natura vellet protulisse, ut yt | cum ad ultimum animo contendissemus, ibi tamen, ubi oportet, 98 | consisteremus : and yet himself might have said, Monitis sum sy | minor ipse meis; for it was his own fault, though not in so \jch ) extreme a degree. _ (6) Another fault likewise much of this kind hath been in- :0 | Cident to learned men, which is, that they have esteemed the alee good, and honour of their countries or masters ‘before their own fortunes or safeties. For so saith Demos- 5,9 - thenes unto the Athenians: ‘“‘If it please you to note it, my 4 fi ) gounsels unto you are not such whereby I should grow great een eee meee eaeneseme Rs ae 26 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. amongst you, and you become little amongst the Grecians ; but they be of that nature as they are sometimes not good for me to give, but are always good for you to follow.” And so Seneca, after he had consecrated that Quinquennium Neronis to the eternal glory of learned governors, held on his honest and loyal course of good and free counsel after his master grew extremely corrupt in his government. Neither can this point otherwise be, for learning endueth men’s minds with a true sense of the frailty of their persons, the casualty of their fortunes, and the dignity of their soul and vocation, so that it is impossible for them to esteem that any greatness of their own fortune can be a true or worthy end of their being and ordainment, and therefore are desirous to give their account to ‘God, and so likewise to their masters under God (as kings and the states that they serve) in these words, Ecce tibi lucre- feci, and not Ecce mihi. lucrefect; whereas the corrupter never caring in all tempests what becomes of the ship of state, so they may save themselves in the cockboat of their uwn fortune ; whereas men that feel the weight of duty and know the limits of self-love use to make good their places and duties, though with peril; and if they stand in seditious and — violent alterations, it is rather the reverence which many — times both adverse parts do give to honesty, than any versatile advantage of their own carriage. But for this point of tender | sense and fast obligation of duty which learning doth endue the mind withal, howsoever fortune may tax it, and many in the depth of their corrupt principles may despise it, yet it will receive an open allowance, and therefore needs the less dis- proof or excuse. (7) Another fault incident commonly to learned men, which | may be more properly defended than truly denied, is that they fail sometimes in applying themselves to particular per- sons, which want of exact application ariseth from two causes— | the one, because the largeness of their mind can hardly confine itself to dwell in the exquisite observation or examination of the nature and customs of one person, for it is a speech for a lover, and not for a wise man, Satis magnum alter altert theatrum sumus. Nevertheless I shall yield that he that cannot contract the sight of his mind as well as disperse and dilate it, wanteth a great faculty. But there is a second << THE FIRST BOOK. : 27 cause, which is no inability, but a rejection upon choice and judgment. For the honest and just bounds of observation by one person upon another extend no further but to understand him sufficiently, whereby not to give him offence, or whereby to be able to give him faithful counsel, or whereby to. stand upon reasonable guard and caution in respect of a man’s self. But to be speculative into another man to the end to know how to work him, or wind him, or govern him, proceedeth from a heart that is double and cloven, and not entire and ingenuous; which as in friendship it is want of integrity, so of the Levant, which is that subjects do forbear to gaze or fix their eyes upon princes, is in the outward ceremony barbarous, but the moral is good ; for men ought not, by cunning and bent observations, to pierce and penetrate into the avearts of kings, which the Scripture-hath-deelared-to-be inscrutable." ere is yet another fault (with which I will conclude this part) which is often noted in learned men, that they do many times fail to observé decency and discretion in their behaviour and carriage, and commit errors in small and or- | dinary points of action, so as the vulgar sort of capacities do make a judgment of them in greater matters by that which they find wanting in them in smaller. But this consequence doth oft deceive men, for which I do refer them over to that which was said by Themistocles, arrogantly and uncivilly being applied to himself out of his own mouth, but, being - }applied to the general state of this question, pertinently and justly, when, being invited to touch a lute, he said, “‘ He could not fiddle, but he could make a small town a great state.” So no doubt many may be well seen in the passages of government and policy which are to seek in little and punctual occasions. I refer them also to that which Plato said of his 7} master Socrates, whom he compared to the gallipots of apothe- caries, which on the outside had apes and owls and antiques, i) but contained within sovereign and precious liquors and con- -}fections ; acknowledging that, to an external report, he was }not without superficial levities and deformities, but was in- }wardly replenished with excellent virtues and powers. And so much touching the point of manners of learned men. (9) But in the meantime I have no purpose to give allowance s ¥6o some conditions and coursés base and unworthy, wherein ‘divers professors of learning have wronged themselves and ab YZone too far; such as were those trencher philosophers which i }im the later age of the Roman state were usually in the houses of great persons, being little better than solemn parasites, of ae. ee ee ene towards princes or superiors is want of duty. For the custom + 28 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING, which kind, Lucian maketh a merry description of the philo- sopher that the great lady took to ride with her in her coach, and would needs have him carry her little dog, which! he doing officiously and yet uncomely, the page scoffed and said, ‘‘That he doubted the philosopher of a Stoic would turn to be a Cynic.” But, above all the rest, the gross and palpable flattery whereunto many not unlearned have abased and abused their wits and pens, turning (as Du Bartas saith) Hecuba into Helena, and Faustina into Lucretia, hath most diminished the price and estimation of learning. Neither is the modern dedi- cation of books and writings, as to patrons, to be commended, for that books (such as are worthy the name of books) ought to have no patrons but truth and reason. And the ancient custom was to dedicate them only to private and equal friends, or to entitle the books with their names; or if to kings and great persons, it was to some such as the argument of the book was fit and proper for ; but these and the like courses may deserve rather reprehension than defence. (10) Not that I can tax or condemn the morigeration or application of learned men to men in fortune. For the answer was good that Diogenes made to one that asked him in mockery, ‘‘How it came to pass that philosophers were the followers of rich men, and not rich men of philosophers?” He answered soberly, and yet sharply, ‘‘ Because the one sort knew what they ha:l need of, and the other did not.” And of the like nature wa. the answer which Aristippus made, when having a petition to Dionysius, and no ear given to him, he ~ fell down at his feet, whereupon Dionysius stayed and gave — him the hearing, and granted it ; and afterwards some person, — tender on the behalf of philosophy, reproved Aristippus that — he would offer the profession of philosophy such an indignity — as for a private suit to fall at a tyrant’s feet ; but he answered, “Tt was not his fault, but it was the fault of Dionysius, that — had his ears in his feet.” Neither was it accounted weakness, — but discretion, in him that would not dispute his best with ~ Adrianus Cesar, excusing himself, ‘‘That it was reason to — yield to him that commanded thirty legions.” These and the © like applications, and stooping to points of necessity and con- — venience, cannot be disallowed ; for though they may have ~ some outward baseness, yet in a judgment truly made they are © to be accounted submissions to the occasion and not to the © person, 4 IV. (1) Now I proceed to those errors and vanities which }} have intervened amongst the studies themselves of the learned, © which is that which is principal and proper to the present — THE FIRST BOOK. 99 argument; wherein my purpose is not to make a justification of the errors, but by a censure and separation of the errors to make a justification of that which is good and sound, and to deliver that from the aspersion of the other. For we see that it is the manner of men to scandalise and deprave that which retaineth the state and virtue, by taking advantage upon that which is corrupt and degenerate, as the heathens in the primi- tive Church used to blemish and taint the Christians with the faults and corruptions of heretics. But nevertheless I have no meaning at this time to make any exact animadversion of the errors and impediments in matters of learning, which are more secret and remote from vulgar opinion, but only to speak unto such as do fall under or near unto a popular observation. (2) There be therefore chiefly three vanities in studies, whereby learning hath been most traduced. For those things we do esteem vain which are either false or frivolous, those which either have no truth or no use ; and those persons we esteem vain which are eithercredulous or curious ; and curiosity is either in matter or words: so that in reason as well as in experience there fall out to be these three distempers (as I may term them) of learning—the first, fantastical learning ; the second, contentious learning ; and the last, delicate learn- ing; vain imaginations, vain altercations, and vain affecta- tions ; and with the last I will begin. Martin Luther, con- ducted, no doubt, by a higher Providence, but in discourse of reason, finding what a province he had undertaken against the Bishop of Rome and the degenerate traditions of the Church, and finding his own solitude, being in nowise aided by the opinions of his own time, was enforced to awake all antiquity, and to call former times to his succours to make a party against the present time. So that the ancient authors, both in divinity and in humanity, which had long time slept in j libraries, began generally to be read and revolved. This, by consequence, did draw on a necessity of a more exquisite ‘travail in the languages original, wherein those authors did ‘write, for the better understanding of those authors, and the better advantage of pressing and applying their words. And thereof grew, again, a delight in their manner of style and phrase, and an admiration of that kind of writing, which was much furthered and precipitated by the enmity and opposition —|that the propounders of those primitive but seeming new Jopinions had against the schoolmen, who were generally of ‘the contrary part, and whose writings were altogether in a ‘differing style and form; taking liberty to coin and frame new terms of art to express their own sense, and to avoid circuit of 30 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. speech, without regard to the pureness, pleasantness, and (as I may call it) lawfulness of the phrase or word. And again, because the great labour then was with the people (of whom the Pharisees were wont to say, Execrabilis ista turba, que non novit legem), for tae winning and persuading of them, there grew of necessity in chief price and request eloquence and variety of discourse, as the fittest and forciblest access, into the capacity of the vulgar sort ; so that these four causes concurring—the admiration of ancient authors, the hate of the schoolmen, the exact study of languages, and the efficacy of preaching—did bring in an ‘affectionate study of eloquence and copy of speech, which then began to flourish. This grew speedily to an excess ; for men began to hunt more after words than matter—more after the choiceness of the phrase, and the round and clean composition of the sentence, and the sweet falling of the clauses, and the varying and illustration of their works with tropes and figures, than after the weight of matter, worth of subject, soundness of argument, life of invention, or depth of judgment. Then grew the flowing and watery vein of Osorius, the Portugal bishop, to be in price. Then did Sturmius spend such infinite and curious pains upon Cicero the Orator and Hermogenes the Rhetorician, besides his own books of Periods and Imitation, and the like. Then did Car of Cambridge and Ascham with their lectures and writings almost deify Cicero and Demosthenes, and allure all young men that were studious unto that delicate and polished kind of learning. Then did Erasmus take occasion to make the scoffing echo, Decem annos consumpst in legendo Cicerone ; and the echo amswered in Greek, One, Asine. Then grew the learning of the schoolmen to be utterly despised as bar- barous.. In sum, the whole inclination and bent of those times was rather towards copy than weight. (3) Here therefore [is] the first distemper of learning, when men study words and not matter ; whereof, though I have represented an example of late times, yet it hath been and will be secundum majus et minus in all time. And how is it possible but this should have an operation to discredit learning, even with vulgar capacities, when they see learned men’s works like the first letter of a patent or limned book, which though it hath large flourishes, yet it is but a letter? It seems to me that Pygmalion’s frenzy is a good emblem or portraiture of this vanity; for words are but the images of matter, and except they have life of reason and invention, to fall in love with them is all one as to fall in love with a picture. (4) But yet notwithstanding it is a thing not hastily to be THE FIRST BOOK. 53 condemned, to clothe and adorn the obscurity even of philo- sophy itself with sensible and plausible elocution. For hereof we have great examples in Xenophon, Cicero, Seneca, Plutarch, and of Plato also in some degree ; and hereof likewise there is great use, for surely, to the severe inquisition of truth and the deep progress into philosophy, it is some hindrance ; because it is too early satisfactory to the mind of man, and quencheth the desire of further search before we come to a just period. But then if a man be to have any use of such knowledge in civil occasions, of conference, counsel, persua- sion, discourse, or the like, then shall he find it prepared to his hands in those authors which write in that manner. But the excess of this is so justly contemptible, that as Hercules, when he saw the image of Adonis, Venus’ minion, in a temple, said in disdain, WV2l sacri es; so there is none of Hercules’ followers in learning—that is, the more severe and laborious sort of inquirers into truth—but will despise those delicacies and affectations, as indeed capable of no divineness. And thus much of the first disease or distemper of learning. (5) The second which followeth is in nature worse than the former: for as substance of matter is better than beauty of words, so contrariwise vain matter is worse than vain words: wherein it seemeth the reprehension of St. Paul was not only proper for those times, but prophetical for the times following ; and not only respective to divinity, but extensive to all knowledge: Devtta profanas vocum novitates, et oppo- sitiones falsi nominis scientic. For he assigneth two marks and badges of suspected and falsified science: the one, the novelty and strangeness of terms ; the other, the strictness of } positions, which of necessity doth induce oppositions, and so ) questions and altercations. Surely, like as many substances / in nature which are solid do putrify and corrupt into worms ; so it is the property of good and sound knowledge to putrefy j and dissolve into a number of subtle, idle, unwholesome, and } (as I may term them) vermiculate questions, which have in- 4 deed a kind of quickness and life of spirit, but no soundness of i} matter or goodness of quality. This kind of degenerate learn- | ing did chiefly reign amongst the schoolmen, who having sharp -and strong wits, and abundance of leisure, and small variety -of reading, but their wits being shut up in the cells of a few deuthors ( (chiefly Aristotle their dictator) as their persons were bey up in the cells of monasteries and colleges, and knowing ttle history, either of nature or time, did out of no great “quantity of matter and infinite agitation of wit spin out unto ; us those laborious webs of learning which are extant in their. 32 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING books. For the wit and mind of man, if it work upon matter, which is the contemplation of the creatures of God, worketh according to the stuff and is limited thereby; but if it work upon itself, as the spider worketh his web, then it is endless, and brings forth indeed cobwebs of learning, admirable for the fineness of thread and work, but of no substance or profit. (6) This same unprofitable subtility or curiosity is of two sorts : either in the subject itself that they handle, when it is a fruitless speculation or controversy (whereof there are no small number both in divinity and philosophy), or in the manner or method of handling of a knowledge, which amongst them was this—upon every particular position or assertion to frame objections, and to those objections, solutions ; which _ solutions were for the most part not confutations, but dis- tinctions: whereas indeed the strength of all sciences is, as the strength of the old man’s faggot, in the bond. For the harmony of a science, supporting each part the other, is and ought to be the true and brief confutation and suppression of all the smaller sort of objections. But, on the other side, if you take out every axiom, as the sticks of the faggot, one by one, you may quarrel with them and bend them and break them at your pleasure : so that, as was said of Seneca, Verborum minutiis rerum frangit pondera, so a man may truly say of the — schoolmen, Questionum minutiis scientiarum frangunt solidi- tatem. For were it not better for a man in 2 fair room to set — up one great light, or branching candlestick of lights, than to go about with a small watch-candle into every corner? And — such is their method, that rests not so much upon evidence of truth proved by arguments, authorities, similitudes, examples, — as upon particular confutations and solutions of every scruple, cavillation, and objection; breeding for the most part one — question as fast as it solveth another; even as in the former ~ resemblance, when you carry the light into one corner, you darken the rest ; so that the fable and fiction of Scyllaseemeth | to be a lively image of this kind of philosophy or knowledge ; — which was transformed inte a comely virgin for the upper parts ; but then Candida succinctam latrantibus inguina mon-~— stris: so the generalities of the schoolmen are for a while good — and proportionable ; but then when you descend into their . distinctions and decisions, instead of a fruitful womb for the ] use and benefit of man’s life, they end in monstrous altercations — and barking questions. So as it is not possible but this quality | of knowledge must fall under popular contempt, the people | being apt to contemn truth upon occasion of controversies and | altercations, and to think they are all out of their way which — r | Ge THE FIRST BOOK. 3S never meet ; and when they see such digladiation about sub. tleties, and matters of no use or moment, they easily fall upon that judgment of Dionysius of Syracusa, Verba ista sunt senum otiosorum. (7) Notwithstanding, certain it is that if those schoolmen to their great thirst of truth and unwearied travail of wit had joined variety and universality of reading and contemplation, they had proved excellent lights, to the great advancement of all learning and knewledge; but as they are, they are great undertakers indeed, and fierce with dark keeping. But as in the inquiry of the divine truth, their pride inclined to leave the oracle of God’s word, and to vanish in the mixture of their own inventions ; so in the inquisition of nature, they ever left the oracle of God’s works, and adored the deceiving and deformed images which the unequal mirror of their own minds, or a few received authors or principles, did represent unto them. And thus much for the second disease of learn- g. (8) For the third vice or disease of learning, which con- cerneth deceit or untruth, it is of all the rest the foulest ; as that which doth destroy the essential form of knowledge, which is nothing but a representation of truth: for the truth of being and the truth of knowing are one, differing no more than the direct beam and the beam reflected. This vice there- Aore brancheth itself into two sorts; delight in deceiving and aptness to be deceived ; imposture and credulity ; which, al- though they appear to be of a diverse nature, the one seeming | to proceed of cunning and the other of simplicity, yet cer- ‘\ tainly they do for the most part concur: for, as the verse noteth— ‘**Percontatorem fugito, nam garrulus idem est,” ‘an inquisitive man is a prattler; so upon the like reason a ‘)credulous man is a deceiver: as we see it in fame, that he that will easily believe rumours will as easily augment rumours and add somewhat to them of his own; which Tacitus "wisely noteth, when he saith, Mingunt simul creduntque: so 1) great an affinity hath fiction and belief. (9) This facility of credit and accepting or admitting things }weakly authorised or warranted is of two kinds according to ‘the subject: for it is either a belief of history, or, as the law- ‘Hyers speak, matter of fact ; or else of matter of art and opinion. fi As to the former, we see the experience and inconvenience of this error in ecclesiastical history ; which hath too easily received and registered reports and narrations of miracles B—S4 34 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. wrought by martyrs, hermits, or monks of the desert, and other holy men, and their relics, shrines, chapels and images : which though they had a passage for a time by the ignorance of the people, the superstitious simplicity of some and the politic toleration of others holding them but as divine poesies, yet after a period of time, when the mist began to clear up, they grew to be esteemed but as old wives’ fables, impostures of the clergy, illusions of spirits, and badges of Antichrist, to the great scandal and detriment of religion. (10) So in natural history, we see there hath not been that choice and judgment used as ought to have been; as may appear in the writings of Plinius, Cardanus, Albertus, and divers of the Arabians, being fraught with much fabulous matter, a great part not only untried, but notoriously untrue, to the great derogation of the credit of natural philosophy with the grave and sober kind of wits : wherein the wisdom and integrity of Aristotle is worthy to be observed, that, having made so diligent and exquisite a history of living creatures, hath mingled it sparingly with any vain or feigned matter; and yet on the other side hath cast all prodigious narrations, which he thought worthy the recording, into one book, excellently discerning that matter of manifest truth, such whereupon observation and rule was to be built, was not+ to be mingled or weakened with matter of doubtful credit 3 and yet again, that rarities and reports that seem uncredible ‘ are not to be suppressed or denied to the memory of men. (11) And as for the facility of credit which is yielded to arts and opinions, it is likewise of two kinds; either when too much belief is attributed to the arts themselves, or to certain authors in any art. The sciences themselves, which — have had better intelligence and confederacy with the imagina- | tion of man than with his reason, are three in number: astrology, natural magic, and alchemy; of which sciences, nevertheless, the ends or pretences are noble, For astrology pretendeth to discover that correspondence or concatenation which is between the superior globe and the inferior ; natural | magic pretendeth to call and reduce natural philosophy from” variety of speculations to the magnitude of works ; and alchemy pretendeth to make separation of all the unlike parts of bodies which in mixtures of natures are incorporate. But the de- | rivations and prosecutions to these ends, both in the theories” and in the practices, are full of error and vanity ; which the great professors themselves have sought to veil over and con- ceal by enigmatical writings, and referring themselves to auricular traditions and such other devices, to save the credit’ THE FIRST BOOK. 35 of impostures. And yet surely to alchemy this right is due, _ that it may be compared to the husbandman whereof A‘sop makes the fable; that, when he died, told his sons that he had left unto them gold buried underground in his vineyard ; and they digged over all the ground, and gold they found none ; but by reason of their stirring and digging the mould about the roots of their vines, they had a great vintage the year following: so assuredly the search and stir to make gold hath brought to light a great number of good and fruitful inventions and experiments, as well for the disclosing of nature as for the use of man’s life. (12) And as for the overmuch credit that hath been given unto authors in sciences, in making them dictators, that their words should stand, and not consuls, to give advice; the damage is infinite that sciences have received thereby, as the principal cause that hath kept them low at a stay without growth or advancement. For hence it hath come, that in arts mechanical the first deviser comes shortest, and time addeth and perfecteth ; but in sciences the first author goeth furthest, and time leeseth and corrupteth. So we see artillery, sailing, printing, and the like, were grossly managed at the first, and by time accommodated and refined ; but contrariwise, the philosophies and sciences of Aristotle, Plato, Democritus, Hippocrates, Euclides, Archimedes, of most vigour at the first, and by time degenerate and imbased: whereof the reason is no _} other, but that in the former many wits and industries have . | contributed in one; and in the latter many wits and indus- , | tries have been spent about the wit of some one, whom many , ) times they have rather depraved than illustrated; for, as } water will not ascend higher than the level of the first spring- , )head from whence it descendeth, so knowledge derived from Aristotle, and exempted from liberty of examination, will not J ‘Tise again higher than the knowledge of Aristotle. And, there- , fore, although the position be good, Oportet discentem credere, yet it must be coupled with this, Oportet edoctum judicare ; for disciples do owe unto masters only a temporary belief anda sus- I snsion of their own judgment till they be fully instructed, and i ot an absolute resignation or perpetual captivity ; and there- fore, to conclude this point, I will say no more, but so let great © authors have their due, as time, which is the author of authors, * be not deprived of his due—which is, further and further to na ‘Miscover truth. Thus have I gone over these three diseases r he learning ; besides the which there are some other rather pe ecant humours than formed diseases, which, nevertheless, are not so secret and intrinsic, but that they fall under s 36 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. popular observation and traducement, and, therefore, are not to be passed over. V. (1) The first of these is the extreme affecting of two extremities : the one antiquity, the other novelty ; wherein it seemeth the children of time do take after the nature and malice of the father. For as he devoureth his children, so one of them seeketh to devour and suppress the other; while an- tiquity envieth there should be new additions, and novelty cannot be content to add but it must deface ; surely the advice of the prophet is the true direction in this matter, State super vias antiquas, et videte quenam sit via recta et bona et ambulate in ea. Antiquity deserveth that reverence, that men should make a stand thereupon and discover what is the best way ; but when the discovery is well taken, then to make pro- gression. And to speak truly, Antiquitas sceculi juventus mundi. These times are the ancient times, when the world is ancient, and not those which we account ancient ordine retro- rado, by a computation backward from ourselves. (2) Another error induced by the former is a distrust that anything should be now to be found out, which the world should have missed and passed over so long time: as if the same objection were to be made to time that Lucian maketh to Jupiter and other the heathen gods ; of which he wondereth that they begot so many children in old time, and begot none — in his time; and asketh whether they were become septua- a genary, or whether the law Papia, made against old men’s — marriages, had restrained them. So it seemeth men doubt ~ lest time is become past children and generation ; wherein con- — trariwise we see commonly the levity and unconstancy of men’s judgments, which, till a matter be done, wonder that it can — be done; and as soon as it is done, wonder again that it was | no sooner done : as we see in the expedition of Alexander into ~ Asia, which at first. was prejudged as a vast and impossible ~ enterprise ; and yet afterwards it pleaseth Livy to make no =| more of it than this, Wil aliud quam bene ausus vana con- — temnere. And the same happened to Columbus in the western ~ navigation. But in intellectual matters it is much more : common, as may be seen in most of the propositions of Euclid ; — which till they be demonstrate, they seem strange to our” assent; but being demonstrate, our mind accepteth of them by a kind of relation (as the lawyers speak), as if we had known ~ them before. (3) Another error, that hath also some affinity with the former, is a conceit that of former opinions or sects after — variety and examination the best hath still prevailed and THE FIRST BOOK. 37 suppressed the rest; so as if a man should begin the labour of a new search, he were but like to light upon somewhat formerly rejected, and by rejection brought into oblivion ; as if the multi- tude, or the wisest for the multitude’s sake, were not ready to give passage rather to that which is popular and superficial than to that which is substantial and profound ; for the truth is, that time seemeth to be of the nature of a river or stream, which carrieth down to us that which is light and blown up, and sinketh and drowneth that which is weighty and solid. (4) Another error, of a diverse nature from all the former, is the over-early and peremptory reduction of knowledge into arts and methods ; from which time commonly sciences receive small or no augmentation. But as young men, when they knit and shape perfectly, do seldom grow to a further stature, so knowledge, while it is in aphorisms and observations, it is in growth ; but when it once is comprehended in exact methods, it may, perchance, be further polished, and illustrate and accommodated for use and practice, but it increaseth no more in bulk and substance. (5) Another error which doth succeed that which we last mentioned is, that after the distribution of particular arts and sciences, men have abandoned universality, or philosophia prima, which cannot but cease and stop all progression. For no perfect discovery can be made upon a flat or a level ; neither is it possible to discover the more remote and deeper parts of any science if you stand but upon the level of the same science, and ascend not to a higher science. (6) Another error hath proceeded from too great a reverence, and a kind of adoration of the mind and understanding of man ; by means whereof, men have withdrawn themselves too much from the contemplation of nature, and the observations of ex- perience, and have tumbled up and down in their own reason and conceits. Upon these intellectualists, which are not- withstanding commonly taken for the most sublime and divine philosophers, Heraclitus gave a just censure, saying :—‘‘Men sought truth in their own little worlds, and not in the great and common world ;” for they disdain to spell, and so by degrees to read in the volume of God’s works; and contrari- wise by continual meditation and agitation of wit do urge and, as it were, invocate their own spirits to divine and give oracles unto them, whereby they are deservedly deluded. (7) Another error that hath some connection with this latter is, that men have used to infect their meditations, opinions, and doctrines with some conceits which they have most admired, or some sciences which they have most applied, and 388 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING, given all things else a tincture according to them, utterly un- true and improper. So hath Plato intermingled his philosophy with theology, and Aristotle with logic; and the second school of Plato, Proclus and the rest, with the mathematics ; for these were the arts which had a kind of primogeniture with them severally. So have the alchemists made a philosophy out of a few experiments of the furnace ; and Gilbertus our country- man hath made a philosophy out of the observations of a load- stone. So Cicero, when reciting the several opinions of the nature of the soul, he found a musician that held the soul was but a harmony, saith pleasantly, Hic ab arte sua non recessit, &c. But of these conceits Aristotle speaketh seriously and wisely when he saith, Qui respiciunt ad pauca de facili pro- nunciant. (8) Another error is an impatience of doubt, and haste to assertion without due and mature suspension of judgment. For the two ways of contemplation are not unlike the two ways of action commonly spoken of by the ancients : the one plain and smooth in the beginning, and in the end impassable ; the other rough and troublesome in the entrance, but after a while fair and even. So it is in contemplation : if a man will begin with certainties, he shall end in doubts; but if he will be content to begin with doubts, he shall end in certainties. (9) Another error is in the manner of the tradition and delivery of knowledge, which is for the most part magistral and eremptory, and not ingenuous and faithful; in a sort as may e soonest believed, and not easiliest examined. It is true, _that in compendious treatises for practice that form is not to be disallowed ; but in the true handling of knowledge men ought not to fall either on the one side into the vein of Velleius the Epicurean, Wil tam metuens quam ne dubitare aliqua de re videretur : nor, on the other side, into Socrates, his ironical doubting of all things ; but to propound things sincerely with more or less asseveration, as they stand in a man’s own judg- ment proved more or less. (10) Other errors there are in the scope that men propound to themselves, whereunto they bend their endeavours ; for, whereas the more constant and devote kind of professors of any science ought to propound to themselves to make some additions to their science, they convert their labours to aspire to certain second prizes: as to be a profound interpreter or commentor, to be a sharp champion or defender, to be a methodi- cal compounder or abridger, and so the patrimony of knowledge cometh to be sometimes improved, but seldom augmented. (11) But the greatest error of all the rest is the mistaking or eS ange eee ees wget ai ata EE THE FIRST BOOK. 39 misplacing of the last or furthest end of knowledge. For men have entered into a desire of learning and knowledge, some- times upon a natural curiosity and inquisitive appetite; some- times to entertain their minds with variety and delight ; sometimes for ornament and reputation ; and sometimes to enable them to victory of wit and contradiction ; and most times for lucre and profession ; and seldom sincerely to give a true account of their gi reason to the benefit and use of men: as if there were sought in knowle ge a couch wherétifon est a searching and restless spirit 3 or a terrace for a wandering and variable mind to walk up and down with a fair prospect ; or a tower of state, for a proud mind to raise itself upon ; or a fort or commanding ground, for strife and conten- tion ; or a shop, for profit or sale; and not a rich storehouse for the glory of the Creator and the relief of man’s estate. But this is that which will indeed dignify and exalt knowledge, if soutemblation and action may be more nearly and straitly conjoined and united together than they have been: a con- junction like unto that of the two highest planets, Saturn, the planet of rest and contemplation ; and Jupiter, the planet of civil society and action. Howbeit, I do not mean, when I speak of use and action, that end before-mentioned of the applying of knowledge to lucre and profession ; for I am not ignorant how much that diverteth and interrupteth the prose- cution and advancement of knowledge, like unto the golden ball thrown before Atalanta, which, while she goeth aside and stoopeth to take up, the race is hindered, “ Declinat cursus, aurumque volubile tollit.” * Neither is my meaning, as was spoken of Socrates, to call philosophy down from heaven to converse upon the earth— that is, to leave natural philosophy aside, and to apply know- ledge only to manners and policy. But as both heaven and earth do conspire and contribute to the use and benefit of man, so the end ought to be, from both philosophies to separate and reject vain speculations, and whatsoever is empty and void, and to preserve and augment whatsoever is solid and fruitful ; a that knowledge may not be as a courtesan, for pleasure and. , vanity only, oras a bond-woman, to acquire and gain to her ~ master’s use; but as a spouse, for generation, fruit, and comfort. (12) Thus have I described and opened, as by a kind of ‘ ae in the race and takes the wpeeding gold. Ovid. Metam, x. 667. 40 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. dissection, those peccant humours (the principal of them) which have not only given impediment to the proficience of learning, but have given also occasion to the traducement thereof : wherein, if I have been too plain, it must be remem- bered, fidelia vulnera amantis, sed dolosa oscula malignantis. This I think I have gained, that I ought to be the better believed-in that which I shall say pertaining to commendation ; because I have proceeded so freely in that which concerneth censure. And yet I have no purpose to enter into a laudative of learning, or to make a hymn to the Muses (though I am of opinion that it is long since their rites were duly celebrated), but my intent is, without varnish or amplification justly to weigh the dignity of knowledge in the balance with other things, and to take the true value thereof by testimonies and arguments, divine and human. VI. (1) First, therefore, let us seek the dignity of knowledge in the archetype or first platform, which is in the attributes and acts of God, as far as they are revealed to man and may be observed with sobriety ; wherein we may not seek it by the name of learning, for all learning is knowledge acquired, and all knowledge in God is original, and therefore we must look for it by another name, that of wisdom or sapience, as the Scriptures call it. (2) It is so, then, that in the work of the creation we see a double emanation of virtue from God ; the one referring more properly to power, the other to wisdom ; the one expressed in making the subsistence of the matter, and the other in disposing the beauty of the form. This being supposed, it is to be observed that for anything which appeareth in the history of the creation, the confused mass and matter of heaven and earth was made in a moment, and the order and disposition of that chaos or mass was the work of six days; such a note of difference it pleased God to put upon the works of power, and the works of wisdom; wherewith concurreth, that in the former it is not set down that God said, ‘‘Let there be heaven and earth,” as it is set down of the works following ; but actually, that God made heaven and earth: the one carrying the style of a manufacture, and the other of a law, decree, or counsel. (3) To proceed, to that which is next in order from God, to spirits : ‘we find, as far as credit is to be given to the celestial hierarchy of that supposed Dionysius, the senator of Athens, the first place or degree is given to the angels of love, which ure termed seraphim ; the second to the angels of light, which are termed cherubim ; and the thir, and so following places, THE FIRST BOOK. 4] to thrones, principalities, and the rest, which are all angels of power and ministry; so as the angels of knowledge and illumination: are placed before the angels of office and domination. (4) To descend from spirits and intellectual forms to sensible and material forms, we read the first form that was created was light, which hath a relation and correspondence in nature and corporal things to knowledge in spirits and incorporal things. ~ (5) So in the distribution of days we see the day wherein God did rest and contemplate His own works was blessed above all the days wherein He did effect and accomplish them. (6) After the creation was finished, it is set down unto us that man was placed in the garden to work therein; which work, so appointed to him, could be no other than work of contemplation; that is, when the end of work is but for exercise and experiment, not for necessity ; for there being then no reluctation of the creature, nor sweat of the brow, man’s employment must of consequence have been matter of delight in the experiment, and not matter of labour for the use. Again, the first acts which man performed in Paradise consisted of the two summary parts of knowledge; the view of creatures, and the imposition of names. As for the knowledge which induced the fall, it was, as was touched before, not the _ natural knowledge of creatures, but the moral knowledge of good and evil; wherein the supposition was, that God’s com- mandments or prohibitions were not the originals of good and evil, but that they had other beginnings, which man aspired to know, to the end to make a total defection from God and to depend wholly upon himself. . _ (7) To pass on: in the first event or occurrence after the fall of man, we see (as the Scriptures have infinite mysteries, not violating at all the truth of the story or letter) an image of the two estates, the contemplative state and the active state, figured in the two persons of Abel and Cain, and in the two simplest and most primitive trades of life; that of the shep- herd (who, by reason of his leisure, rest in a place, and living in view of heaven, is a lively image of a contemplative life), and that of the husbandman, where we see again the favour and election of God went to the shepherd, and not to the tiller of the ground. ____ (8) So in the age before the flood, the holy records within _ those few memorials which are there entered and registered _ have vouchsafed to mention and honour the name of the ‘i inventors and authors of music and works in metal. In the B*—84 42, THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. age after the flood, the first great judgment of God upon the,’ ambition of man was the confusion of tongues ; whereby the} open trade and intercourse of learning and knowledge was) chiefly imbarred. : (9) To descend to Moses the lawgiver, and God’s first pen: he is adorned by the Scriptures with this addition and com- mendation, ‘‘That he was seen in all the learning of the Egyptians,” which nation we know was one of the most ancient schools of the world: for so Plato brings in the Egyptian priest saying unto Solon, “You Grecians are ever children ; you have no knowledge of antiquity, nor antiquity of know- ledge.” Take a view of the ceremonial law of Moses; you shall find, besides the prefiguration of Christ, the badge or difference of the people of God, the exercise and impression of obedience, and other divine uses and fruits thereof, that some of the most learned Rabbins have travailed profitably and profoundly to observe, some of them a natural, some of them a moral sense, or reduction of many of the ceremonies and ordinances. As in the law of the leprosy, where it is said, ‘Tf the whiteness have overspread the flesh, the patient may pass abroad for clean ; but if there be any whole flesh remain- ing, he is to be shut up for unclean ;” one of them noteth a principle of nature, that putrefaction is more contagious before maturity than after; and another noteth a position of moral philosophy, that men abandoned to vice do not so much corrupt manners, as those that are half good and half evil. So in this and very many other places in that law, there is to be found, besides the theological sense, much aspersion of philosophy. (10) So likewise in that excellent book of Job, if it be revolved with diligence, it will be found pregnant and swelling with natural philosophy ; as for example, cosmography, and the roundness of the world, Qui extendit aquilonem super vacuum, et appendit terram super nihilum ; wherein the pensile- ness of the earth, the pole of the north, and the finiteness or convexity of heaven are manifestly touched. So again, matter of astronomy : Spiritus gus ornavit celos, et obstetricante manu ejus eductus est Coluber tortuosus. And in another place, Nunquid conjungere valebis micantes stellas Pleiadas, aut gyrum Arcturi, poteris dissipare? Where the fixing of the stars, ever standing at equal distance, is with great elegancy noted. Andin another place, Qui facit Arcturum, et Oriona, et Hyadas, et interiora Austri ; where again he takes knowledge of the depression of the southern pole, calling it the secrets of the south, because the southern stars were in that climate THE FIRST BOOK. ; 43 unseen. Matter of generation: Annon sicut lac mulsisti me, et sicut caseum coagulasti me? &c. Matter of minerals : Habet argentum venarum suarum principia ; et auro locus est in quo conflatur, ferrum de terra tollitur, et lapis solutus calore in ces vertitur ; and so forwards in that chapter. (11) So likewise in the person of Solomon the king, we see the gift or endowment of wisdom and learning, both in Solomon’s petition and in God’s assent thereunto, preferred before all other terrene and temporal felicity. By virtue of which grant or donative of God Solomon became enabled not only to write those excellent parables or aphorisms concerning divine and moral philosophy, but also to compile a natural history of all verdure, from the cedar upon the mountain to the moss upon the wall (which is but a rudiment between putrefaction and an herb), and also of all things that breathe or move. Nay, the same Solomon the king, although he excelled in the glory of treasure and magnificent buildings, of shipping and navigation, of service and attendance, of fame and renown, and the like, yet he maketh no claim to any of those glories, but only to the glory of inquisition of truth ; for so he saith expressly, ““The glory of God is to conceal a thing, but the glory of the king is to find it out;” as if, according to the innocent play of children, the Divine Majesty took delight to hide His works, to the end to have them found out ; and as if kings could not obtain a greater honour than to be God’s playfellows in that game ; considering the great commandment of wits and means, whereby nothing needeth to be hidden from them. (12) Neither did the dispensation of God vary in the times after our Saviour came intothe world ; for our Saviour himself did first show His power to subdue ignorance, by His conference with the priests and doctors of the law, before He showed His power to subdue nature by His miracles. And the coming of the Holy Spirit was chiefly figured and expressed in the similitude and gift of tongues, which are but vehicula scientic, (13) So in the election of those instruments, which it pleased God to use for the plantation of the faith, notwithstanding that at the first He did employ persons altogether unlearned, otherwise than by inspiration, more evidently to declare His immediate working, and to abase all human wisdom or know- ledge ; yet nevertheless that counsel of His was no sooner performed, but in the next vicissitude and succession He did _ send His divine truth into the world, waited on with other learnings, as with servants or handmaids: for so we see St. Paul, who was only learned amongst the Apostles, had his pen most used in the Scriptures of the New Testament. ( 44 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. (14) So again we find that many of the ancient bishops and fathers of the Church were excellently read and studied in all the learning of the heathen; insomuch that the edict of the Emperor Julianus (whereby it was interdicted unto Christians to be admitted into schools, lectures, or exercises of learning) was esteemed and accounted a more pernicious engine and machination against the Christian Faith than were all the sanguinary prosecutions of his predecessors; neither could the emulation and jealousy of Gregory, the first of that name, Bishop of Rome, ever obtain the opinion of piety or devotion ; but contrariwise received the censure of humour, malignity, and pusillanimity, even amongst holy men ; in that he designed to obliterate and extinguish the memory of heathen antiquity and authors. But contrariwise it was the Christian Church, which, amidst the inundations of the Scythians on the one side from the north-west, and the Saracens from the east, did preserve in the sacred lap and bosom thereof the precious relics even of heathen learning, which otherwise had been extinguished, as if no such thing had ever been. (15) And we see before our eyes, that in the age of ourselves and our fathers, when it pleased God to call the Church of Rome to account for their degenerate manners and ceremonies, and sundry doctrines obnoxious and framed to uphold the same abuses ; at one and the same time it was ordained by the Divine Providence that there should attend withal a renova- tion and new spring of all other knowledges. And on the other side we see the Jesuits, who partly in themselves, and partly by the emulation and provocation of their example, have much quickened and strengthened the state of learning ; we see (I say) what notable service and reparation they have done to the Roman see. (16) Wherefore, to conclude this part, let it be observed, that there be two principal duties and services, besides ornament and illustration, which philosophy and human learning do perform to faith and religion. The one, because they are an effectual inducement to the exaltation of the glory of God. For as the Psalms and other Scriptures do often invite us to consider and magnify the great and wonderful works of God, so if we should rest only in the contemplation of the exterior of them as they first offer themselves to our senses, we should do a like injury unto the majesty of God, as if we should judge or construe of the store of some excellent jeweller by that only which is set out toward the street in his shop. The other, because they minister a singular help and preservative against unbelief and error. For our Saviour saith, ‘‘ You err, not CS ee ee ee ee een ee THE FIRST BOOK. 45 knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God;” laying before us two books or volumes to study, if we will be secured from error: first the Scriptures, revealing the will of God, and then the creatures expressing His power ; whereof the latter is a key unto the former: not only opening our understanding to conceive the true sense of the Scriptures by the general notions of reason and rules of speech, but chiefly opening our belief, in drawing us into a due meditation of the omnipotency of God, which is chiefly signed and engraven upon His works. Thus much therefore for divine testimony and evidence con- cerning the true dignity and value of learning. VII. (1) As for human proofs, it is so large a field, as in a discourse of this nature and brevity it is fit rather to use choice of those things which we shall produce, than to embrace the variety of them. First, therefore, in the degrees of human honour amongst the heathen, it was the highest to obtain to a veneration and adoration at a God. This unto the Christians is as the forbidden fruit. But we speak now separately of human testimony, according to which—that which the Grecians call apotheosis, and the Latins relatio inter divos—was the supreme honour which man could attribute unto man, specially when it was given, not by a formal decree or act of state (as it was used among the Roman Emperors), but by an inward assent and belief. Which honour, being so high, had also a degree or middle term ; for there were reckoned above human honours, honours heroical and divine: in the attribution and distribution of which honours we see antiquity made this difference ; that whereas founders and uniters of states and cities, lawgivers, extirpers of tyrants, fathers of the people, and other eminent persons in civil merit, were honoured but with the titles of worthies or demigods, such as were Hercules, Theseus, Minos, Romulus, and the like; on the other side, such as were in- ventors and authors of new arts, endowments, and commodities towards man’s life, were ever consecrated amongst the gods themselves, as was Ceres, Bacchus, Mercurius, Apollo, and others. And justly; for the merit of the former is confined within the circle of an age or a nation, and is like fruitful showers, which though they be profitable and good, yet serve but for that season, and for a latitude of ground where they fall; but the other is, indeed, like the benefits of heaven, which are permanent and universal. The former again is mixed with strife and perturbation, but the latter hath the true character of Divine Presence, coming in awra lent, without noise or agitation. (2) Neither is certainly that other merit of learning, in 46 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. repressing theinconveniences which grow fromman to man, much inferior to the former, of relieving the necessities which arise from nature, which merit was lively set forth by the ancients in that feigned relation of Orpheus’ theatre, where all beasts and birds assembled, and, forgetting their several appetites—some of prey, some of game,some of quarrel—stood all sociably together listen- ing unto the airs and accords of the harp, the sound whereof no sooner ceased, or was drowned by some louder noise, but every beast returned to his own nature ; wherein is aptly described the nature and condition of men, who are full of savage and unreclaimed desires, of profit, of lust, of revenge ; which as long as they give ear to precepts, to laws, to religion, sweetly touched with eloquence and persuasion of books, of sermons, of harangues, so long is society and peace maintained ; but if these instruments be silent, or that sedition and tumult make them not audible, all things dissolve into anarchy and confusion. (3) But this appeareth more manifestly when kings themselves, or persons of authority under them, or other governors in com- monwealths and popular estates, are endued with learning. For although he might be thought partial to his own profession that said ‘‘Then should people and estates be happy when either kings were philosophers, or philosophers kings;” yet so much is verified by experience, that under learned princes and governors there have been ever the best times : for howsoever kings may have their imperfections in their passions and cus- toms, yet, if they be illuminate by learning, they have those notions of religion, policy, and morality, which do preserve them and refrain them from all ruinous and peremptory errors and excesses, whispering evermore in their ears, when coun- sellors and servants stand mute and silent. And senators or counsellors, likewise, which be learned, to proceed upon more safe and substantial principles, than counsellors which are only men of experience ; the one sort keeping dangers afar off, whereas the other discover them not till they come near hand, and then trust to the agility of their wit to ward or avoid them. (4) Which felicity of time: under learned princes (to keep still the law of brevity, by usiug the most eminent and selected ex- amples) doth best appear in the age which passed from the death of Domitianus the emperor until the reign of Commodus ; com- prehending a succession of six princes, all learned, or singular favourers and advancers of learning, which age for temporal re- ects was the most happy and flourishing that ever the Roman apire (which then was a model of the world) enjoyed—a matter revealed and prefigured unto Domitian in a dream the night } THE FIRST BOOK. 47 before he was slain: for he thought there was grown behind upon his shoulders a neck and a head of gold, which came ac- cordingly to pass in those golden times which succeeded; of which princes we will make some commemoration ; wherein, although the matter will be vulgar, and may be thought fitter for a declamation than agreeable to a treatise infolded as this is, yet, because it is pertinent to the point in hand—WNeque semper arcum tendit Apollo—and to name them only were too naked and cursory, I will not omit it altogether. The first was Nerva, the excellent temper of whose government is by a glance. in Cornelius Tacitus touched to the life : Postquam divus Nerva res olim insociabiles miscuisset, tmperium et liberiatem. And in token of his learning, the last act of his short reign left to memory was a missive to his adopted son, Trajan, proceeding upon some inward discontent at the ingratitude of the times, comprehended in a verse of Homer’s— “Telis, Phoebe, tuis, lacrymas ulciscere nostras.” (5) Trajan, who succeeded, was for his person not learned ; but if we will hearken to the speech of our Saviour, that saith, ‘He that receiveth a prophet in the name of a prophet shall have a prophet’s reward,” he deserveth to be placed amongst the most learned princes ; for there was not a greater admirer of learning or benefactor of learning, a founder of famous libraries, a perpetual advancer of learned men to office, and a familiar converser with learned professors and preceptors who were noted to have then most credit in court. On the other side, how much Trajan’s virtue and government was admired and renowned, surely no testimony of grave and faithful history doth more lively set forth than that legend tale of Gregorius Magnus, Bishop of Rome, who was noted for the extreme envy he bare towards all heathen excellency ; and yet he is reported, out of the love and estimation of Trajan’s moral virtues, to have made unto God passionate and fervent prayers fc the delivery of his soul out of hell, and to have obtained it, with a caveat that he should make no more such petitions. In this prince’s time also the persecutions against the Christians received inter- mission upon the certificate of Plinius Secundus, a man of excellent learning and by Trajan advanced. (6) Adrian, his successor, was the most curious man that lived, and the most universal inquirer: insomuch as it was noted for an error in his mind that he desired to comprehend all things, and not to reserve himself for the worthiest things, falling into the like humour that was long before noted in 48 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. Philip of Macedon, who, when he would needs overrule and put down an excellent musician in an argument touching music, was well answered by him again—‘‘ God forbid, sir,” saith he, ‘‘that your fortune should be so bad as to know these things better than I.”’ It pleased God likewise to use the curiosity of this emperor as an inducement to the peace of His Church in those days ; for having Christ in veneration, not as a God or Saviour, but as a wonder or novelty, and having his picture in his gallery matched with Apollonius (with whom in his vain imagination he thought he had some conformity), yet it served the turn to allay the bitter hatred of those times against the Christian name, so as the Church had peace during his time. And for his gevernment civil, although he did not attain to that of Trajan’s in glory of arms or perfection of justice, yet in deserving of the weal of the subject he did exceed him. For Trajan erected many famous monuments and buildings, inso- much as Constantine the Great in emulation was wont to call him Parietaria, ‘‘ wall-flower,” because his name was upon so many walls; but his buildings and works were more of glory and triumph than use and necessity. But Adrian spent his whole reign, which was peaceable, in a perambulation or survey ef the Roman Empire, giving order and making assignation where he went for re-edifying of cities, towns, and forts decayed, and for cutting of rivers and streams, and for making bridges and passages, and for policing of cities and commonalties with new ordinances and constitutions, and granting new franchises and incorporations ; so that his whole time was a very restoration of all the lapses and decays of former times. (7) Antoninus Pius, who succeeded him, was a prince ex- cellently learned, and had the patient and subtle wit of a schoolman, insomuch 4s in common speech (which leaves no virtue untaxed) he was called Cymini Sector, a carver or a divider of cummin seed, which is one of the least seeds. Such a patience he had and settled spirit to enter into the least and most exact differences of causes, a fruit no doubt of the exceed- ing tranquillity and serenity of his mind, which being no ways charged or encumbered, either with fears, remorses, or scruples, but having been noted for a man of the purest goodness, with- out all fiction or affectation, that hath reigned or lived, made his mind continually present and entire. He likewise approached a degree nearer unto Christianity, and became, as Agrippa said unto St. Paul, ‘“‘ half a Christian,” holding their religion and law in good opinion, and not only ceasing persecution, but giving way to the advancement of Christians. (8) There succeeded him the first Divi fratres, the two THE FIRST BOOK. 49 adoptive brethren—Lucius Commodus Verus, son to Atlius Verus, who delighted much in the softer kind of learning, and was wont to call the poet Martial his Virgil; and Marcus Aurelius Antoninus : whereof the latter, who obscured his col- league and survived him long, was named the ‘“‘ Philosopher,”’ who, as he excelled all the rest in learning, so he excelled them likewise in perfection of allroyal virtues ; insomuch as Julianus the emperor, in his book entitled Cesares, being as a pasquil or satire to deride all his predecessors, feigned that they were all invited to a banquet of the gods, and Silenus the jester sat at the nether end of the table and bestowed a scoff on everyone as they came in; but when Marcus Philosophus came iv. Silenus was gravelled and out of countenance, not knowing where to carp at him, save at the last he gave a glance at his patience towards his wife. And the virtue of this prince, continued with that of his predecessor, made the name of Antoninus so sacred in the world, that though it were extremely dishonoured in Commodus, Caracalla, and Heliogabalus, who all bare the name, yet, when Alexander Severus refused the name because he was a stranger to the family, the Senate with one acclamation said, Quomodo Augustus, sic eb Antoninus. In such renown and veneration was the name of these two princes in those days, that they would have had it as a perpetual addition in all the emperors’ style. In this emperor’s time also the Church for the most part was in peace ; so as in this sequence of six princes we do see the blessed effects of learning in sovereignty, painted forth in the greatest table of the world. (9) But for a tablet or picture of smaller volume (not pre- suming to speak of your Majesty that liveth), in my judgment the most excellent is that of Queen Elizabeth, your immediate predecessor in this part of Britain ; a prince that, if Plutarch were now alive to write lives by parallels, would trouble him, I think, to find for her a parallel amongst women. This lady was endued with learning in her sex singular, and rare even amongst masculine princes—whether we speak of learning, of language, or of science, modern or ancient, divinity or humanity—and unto the very last year of her life she accustomed to appoint set hours for reading, scarcely any young student in a university more daily or more duly. As for her government, I assure my- self (I shall not exceed if I do affirm) that this part of the island never had forty-five years of better times, and yet not through the calmness of the season, but through the wisdom of her regiment. For if there be considered, of the one side, the truth of religion established, the constant peace and security, the good administration of justice, the temperate use of the 50 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. prerogative, not slackened, nor much strained ; the flourishing state of learning, sortable to so excellent a patroness ; the con- venient estate of wealth and means, both of crown and subject ; the habit of obedience, and the moderation of discontents ; and there be considered, on the other side, the differences of religion, the troubles of neighbour countries, the ambition of Spain, and opposition of Rome, and then that she was solitary and of her- self ; these things, I say, considered, as I could not have chosen an instance so recent and so proper, so I suppose I could not have chosen one more remarkable or eminent to the purpose now in hand, which is concerning the conjunction of learning in the prince with felicity in the people. (10) Neither hath learning an influence and operation only upon civil merit and moral virtue, and the arts or temperature of peace and peaceable government ; but likewise it hath no less power and efficacy in enablement towards martial and military virtue and prowess, as may be notably represented in the ex- amples of Alexander the Great and Czesar the Dictator (men- tioned before, but now in fit place to be resumed), of whose virtues and acts in war there needs no note or recital, having been the wonders of time in that kind; but of their affections towards learning and perfections in learning it is pertinent to say somewhat. (11) Alexander was bred and taught under Aristotle, the great philosopher, who dedicated divers of his books of philo- sophy unto him ; he was attended with Callisthenes and divers other learned persons, that followed him in camp, throughout his journeys and conquests. What price and estimation he had learning in doth notably appear in these three particulars : first, in the envy he used to express that he bare towards Achilles, in this, that he had so good a trumpet of his praises as Homer’s verses ; secondly, in the judgment or solution ho gave torching that precious cabinet of Darius, which was found among his jewels (whereof question was made what thing was worthy to be put into it, and he gave his opinion for Homer’s works); thirdly, in his letter to Aristotle, after he had set forth his books of nature, wherein he expostulateth with him for publishing the secrets or mysteries of philosophy ; and gave him to understand that himself esteemed it more to excel other men in learning and knowledge than in power and empire. And what use he had of learning doth appear, or rather shine, in all his speeches and answers, being full of science and use of science, and that in all variety. (12) And herein again it may seem a thing scholastical, and somewhat idle to recite things that every man knoweth ; but THE FIRST BOOK. Si > yet, since the argument I handle leadeth me thereunto, I am glad that men shall perceive I am as willing to flatter (if they will so call it) an Alexander, or a Cesar, or an Antoninus, that are dead many hundred years since, as any that now liveth ; for it is the displaying of the glory of learning in sovereignty that I propound to myself, and not a humour of declaiming in any man’s praises. Observe, then, the speech he used of Diogenes, and see if it tend not to the true state of one of the greatest questions of moral philosophy : whether the enjoying of outward things, or the contemning of them, be the greatest happiness ; for when he saw Diogenes so perfectly contented with so little, he said to those that mocked at his condition, ““Were I not Alexander, I would wish to be Diogenes.” But Seneca inverteth it, and saith, ‘ Plus erat, quod hic nollet accipere, quam quod ille posset dare.” There were more things which Diogenes would have refused than those were which Alexander could have given or enjoyed. (13) Observe, again, that speech which was usual with him, “That he felt his mortality chiefly in two things, sleep and lust ;” and see if it were not a speech extracted out of the depth of natural philosophy, and liker to have come out of the mouth of Aristotle or Democritus than from Alexander. (14) See, again, that speech of humanity and poesy, when, upon the bleeding of his wounds, he called unto him one of his flatterers, that was wont to ascribe to him divine honour, and said, ‘‘Look, this is very blood; this is not such a liquor as Homer speaketh of, which ran from Venus’ hand when it was pierced by Diomedes.” (15) See likewise his readiness in reprehension of logic in the speech he used to Cassander, upon a complaint that was made against his father Antipater ; for when Alexander happened to say, ‘‘ Do you think these men would have come from so far to complein except they had just cause of grief ?” and Cassander answered, “‘ Yea, that was the matter, because they thought they should not be disproved ;” said Alexander, laughing, “* See the subtleties of Aristotle, to take a matter both ways, pro et contra, &e.” (16) But note, again, how well he could use the same art which he reprehended to serve his own humour : when bearing a secret grudge to Callisthenes, because he was against the new ceremony of his adoration, feasting one night where the same Callisthenes was at the table, it was moved by some after supper, for entertainment sake, that Callisthenes, who was an eloquent man, might speak of some theme or purpose at his own choice ; which Callisthenes did, choosing the praise 52 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. of the Macedonian nation for his discourse, and performing the same with so good manner as the hearers were much ravished ; whereupon Alexander, nothing pleased, said, “It was easy to be eloquent upon so good a subject; but,” saith he, “turn your style, and let us hear what you can say against us;” which Callisthenes presently undertook, and did with that sting and life that Alexander interrupted him, and said, “‘ The goodness of the cause made him eloquent before, and despite made him eloquent then again.” (17) Consider further, for tropes of rhetoric, that excellent use of a metaphor or translation, wherewith he taxed Antipater, who was an imperious and tyrannous governor; for when one of Antipater’s friends commended him to Alexander for his moderation, that he did not degenerate as his other lieutenants did into the Persian pride, in use of purple, but kept the ancient habit of Macedon, of black. ‘‘ True,” saith Alexander ; “but Antipater is all purple within.” Or that other, when Parmenio came to him in the plain of Arbela and showed him the innumerable multitude of his enemies, specially as they appeared by the infinite number of lights as it had been a new firmament of stars, and thereupon advised him to assail them by night ; whereupon he answered, ‘“ That he would not steal the victory.” (18) For matter of policy, weigh that significant distinction, so much in all ages embraced, that he made between his two friends Hephestion and Craterus, when he said, “‘ That the one loved Alexander, and the other loved the king : ” describing the principal difference of princes’ best servants, that some in affection love their person, and other in duty love their crown. (19) Weigh also that excellent taxation of an error, ordinary with counsellors of princes, that they counsel their masters according to the model of their own mind and fortune, and not of their masters. When upon Darius’ great offers Parmenio had said, ‘‘Surely I would accept these offers were I as Alexander ;” saith Alexander, ‘‘So would I were I as Parmenio.” (20) Lastly, weigh that quick and acute reply which he made when he gave so large gifts to his friends and servants, and was asked what he did reserve for himself, and he answered, ‘‘Hope.” Weigh, I say, whether he had not cast up his account aright, because hope must be the portion of all that resolve upon great enterprises; for this was Czsar’s portion when he went first into Gaul, his estate being then utterly overthrown with largesses. And this was likewise the portion of that noble prince, howsoever transported with ambition, THE FIRST BOOK. 53 Henry Duke of Guise, of whom it was usually said that he was the greatest usurer in France, because he had turned all his estate into obligations. (21) To conclude, therefore, as certain critics are used to say hyperbolically, ‘‘ That if all sciences were lost they might be found in Virgil,” so certainly this may be said truly, there are the prints and footsteps of learning in those few speeches which are reported of this prince, the admiration of whom, when I consider him not as Alexander the Great, but as Aristotle’s scholar, hath carried me too far. (22) As for Julius Cesar, the excellency of his learning needeth not to be argued from his education, or his company, or his speeches ; but in a further degree doth declare itself in his writings and works : whereof some are extant and per- manent, and some unfortunately perished. For first, we see there is left unto us that excellent history of his own wars, which he entitled only a Commentary, wherein all succeeding times have admired the solid weight of matter, and the real passages and lively images of actions and persons, expressed in the greatest propriety of words and perspicuity of narration that ever was; which that it was not the effect of a natural gift, but of learning and precept, is well witnessed by that work of his entitled De Analogia, being a grammatical philo- sophy, wherein he did labour to make this same Vox ad placitum to become Vox ad licitum, and to reduce custom of speech to congruity of speech ; and took as it were the pictures of words from the life of reason. (23) So we receive from him, as a monument both of his power and learning, the then reformed computation of the year; well expressing that he took it to be as great a glory to himself to observe and know the law of the heavens, as to give law to men upon the earth. (24) So likewise in that book of his, Anti-Cato, it may easily appear that he did aspire as well to victory of wit as victory of war: undertaking therein a conflict against the greatest champion with the pen that then lived, Cicero the orator. (25) So, again, in his book of Apophthegms, which he col- lected, we see that he esteemed it more honour to make him- self but a pair of tables, to take the wise and pithy words of others, than to have every word of his own to be made an apophthegm or an oracle, as vain princes, by custom of flattery, pretend to do. And yetif I should enumerate divers of his speeches, as I did those of Alexander, they are truly such as Solomon noteth, when he saith, Verba sapientum tanquam aculei, et tanquam clavi in altum defixi; whereof I will only 54 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. recite three, not so delectable for elegancy, but admirable for vigour and efficacy. (26) As first, it is reason he be thought a master of words, that could with one word appease a mutiny in his army, which was thus : The Romans, when their generals did speak to their army, did use the word Milites, but when the magistrates spake to the people they did use the word Quirites. The soldiers were in tumult, and seditiously prayed to be cashiered ; not that they so meant, but by expostulation thereof to draw Gzesar to other conditions ; wherein he being resolute not to give way, after some silence, he began his speech, Ego Quirites, which did admit them already cashiered—wherewith they were so surprised, crossed, and confused, as they would not suffer him to go on in his speech, but relinquished their demands, and made it their suit to be again called by the name of Mzilites. (27) The second speech was thus: Cesar did extremely affect the name of king; and some were set on as he passed by in popular acclamation to salute him king. Whereupon, find- ing the ery weak and poor, he put it off thus, in a kind of jest, as if they had mistaken hissurname: Non Rex sum, sed Cesar ; a speech that, if it be searched, the life and fulness of it can scarce be expressed. For, first, it was a refusal of the name, but yet not sericus; again, it did signify an infinite confidence and magnanimity, as if he presumed Czsar was the greater title, as by his worthiness it is come to pass till this day. But chiefly it was a speech of great allurement toward his own pur- pose, as if the state did strive with him but for a name, whereof mean families were vested; for Rex was a surname with the Romans, as well as King is with us. (28) The last speech which I will mention was used to Metellus, when Czesar, after war declared, did possess himself of the city of Rome; at which time, entering into the inner treasury to take the money there accumulate, Metellus, being tribune, forbade him. Whereto Cesar said, “That if he did not desist, he would lay him dead in the place.” And resently taking himself up, he added, “Young man, it is hard for me to speak it than to do it —Adolescens, durius est mihi hoc dicere quam facere.” A speech compounded of the greatest terror and greatest clemency that could proceed out of the mouth of man. (29) But to return and conclude with him, it is evident him- self knew well his own perfection in learning, and took it upon him, as appeared when upon occasion that some spake what a strange resolution it was in Lucius Sylla to resign his dicta- ture, he, scoffing at him to his own advantage, answered, *‘ That THE FIRST BOOK. 55 Sylla could not skill of letters, and therefore knew not how to dictate.” (30) And here it were fit to leave this point, touching the concurrence of military virtue and learning (for what example should come with any grace after those two of Alexander and ' Cesar ?), were it not in regard of the rareness of circumstance, that I find in one other particular, as that which did so suddenly pass from extreme scorn to extreme wonder: and it is of Xenophon the philosopher, who went from Socrates’ school into Asia in the expedition of Cyrus the younger against King Artaxerxes. This Xenophon at that time was very young, and never had seen the wars before, neither had any command in the army, but only followed the war as a voluntary, for the love and conversation of Proxenus, his friend. He was present when Falinus came in message from the great king to the Grecians, after that Cyrus was slain in the field, and they, a handful of men, left to themselves in the midst of the king’s territories, cut off from their country by many navigable rivers and many hundred miles. The message imported that they should deliver up their arms and submit themselves to the king’s mercy. To which message, before answer was made, divers of the army conferred familiarly with Falinus; and amongst the rest Xenophon happened to say, “‘ Why, Falinus, we have now but these two things left, our arms and our virtue ; and if we yield up our arms, how shall we make use of our virtue?” Whereto Falinus, smiling on him, said, ‘‘If I be not deceived, young gentleman, you are an Athenian, and I believe you study philosophy, and it is pretty that you say ; but you are much abused if you think your virtue can with- stand the king’s power.” Here was the scorn; the wonder followed: which was that this young scholar or philosopher, after all the captains were murdered in parley by treason, con- ducted those ten thousand foot, through the heart of all the king’s high countries, from Babylon to Grecia in safety, in despite of all the king’s forces, to the astonishment of the world, and the encouragement of the Grecians in times suc- ceeding to make invasion upon the kings of Persia, as was after purposed by Jason the Thessalian, attempted by Agesilaus the Spartan, and achieved by Alexander the Macedonian, all upon the ground of the act of that young scholar. VIII. (1) To proceed now from imperial and military virtue to moral and private virtue ; first, itisan assured truth, which is contained in the verses :— “Scilicet ingenuas didicisse fideliter artes Emollit mores nec sinit esse feros,” 56 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. It taketh away the wildness and barbarism and fierceness ot men’s minds ; but indeed the accent had need be upon jfideliter ; for a little superficial learning doth rather work a contrary effect. It taketh away all levity, temerity, and insolency, by copious suggestion of all doubts and difficulties, and acquaint- ing the mind to balance reasons on both sides, and to turn back the first offers and conceits of the mind, and to accept of nothing but examined and tried. It taketh away vain ad- miration of anything, which is the root of all weakness. For all things are admired, either because they are new, or because they are great. For novelty, no man that wadeth in learning or contemplation throughly but will find that printed in his heart, Wil novi super terram. Neither can any man marvel at the play of puppets, that goeth behind the curtain, and ad- viseth well of the motion. And for magnitude, as Alexander the Great, after that he was used to great armies, and the great conquests of the spacious provinces in Asia, when he received letters out of Greece, of some fights and services there, which were commonly for a passage or a fort, or some walled town at the most, he said :—‘‘It seemed to him that he was advertised of the battles of the frogs and the mice, that the old tales went of.” So certainly, if a man meditate much upon the universal frame of nature, the earth with men upon it (the divineness of souls except) will not seem much other than an ant-hill, whereas some ants carry corn, and some carry their young, and some go empty, and all to and fro a little heap of dust. It taketh away or mitigateth fear of death or adverse fortune, which is one of the greatest impedi- ments of virtue and imperfections of manners. For if a man’s mind be deeply seasoned with the consideration of the mor- tality and corruptible nature of things, he will easily concur with Epictetus, who went forth one day and saw a woman weeping for her pitcher of earth that was broken, and went forth the next day and saw a woman weeping for her son that was dead, and thereupon said, ‘‘ Heri vidi fragilem frangi, hodie vidi mortalem mori.” And, therefore, Virgil did excellently and profoundly couple the knowledge of causes and the con- quest of all fears together, as concomitantia. “ Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas, Quique metus omnes, eb Inéxorabike fatum Subjecit yedibus, strepitumque Acherontis avari.” (2) It were too long to go over the particular remedies which learning doth minister to all the diseases of the mind : sometimes purging the ill humours, sometimes opening the THE FIRST BOOK. 57 obstructions, sometimes helping digestion, sometimes increasing appetite, sometimes healing the wounds and exulcerations thereof, and the like ; and, therefore, I will conclude with that which hath rationem totius—which is, that it disposeth the constitution of the mind not to be fixed or settled in the de- fects thereof, but still to be capable and susceptible of growth and reformation. For the unlearned man knows not what it is to descend into himself, or to call himself to account, nor the pleasure of that suavissima vita, indies sentire se fieri meliorem. The good parts he hath he will learn to show to the full, and use them dexterously, but not much to increase them. The faults he hath he will learn how to hide and colour them, but not much to amend them; like an ill mower, that mows on still, and never whets his scythe. Whereas with the learned man it fares otherwise, that he doth ever intermix the correction and amendment of his mind with the use and em- ployment thereof. Nay, further, in general and in sum, certain it is that Veritas and Bonitas differ but as the seal and the print ; for truth prints goodness, and they be the clouds of error which descend in the storms of passions and pertur- bations. (3) From moral virtue let us pass on to matter of power and commandment, and consider whether in right reason there be any comparable with that wherewith knowledge investeth and crowneth man’s nature. We see the dignity of the command- ment is according to the dignity of the commanded; to have commandment over beasts as herdmen have, is a thing con- temptible; to have commandment over children as school- masters have, is a matter of small honour ; to have command- ment over galley-slaves is a disparagement rather than an honour. Neither is the commandment of tyrants much better, over people which have put off the generosity of their minds ; and, therefore, it was ever holden that honours in free monarchies and commonwealths had a sweetness more than in tyrannies, because the commandment extendeth more over the wills of men, and not only over their deeds and services. And therefore, when Virgil putteth himself forth to attribute to Augustus Cesar the best of human honours, he doth it in these words :— **Victorque volentes Per populos dat jura, viamque affectat Olympo.” But yet the commandment of knowledge is yet higher than the - commandment over the will; for it is a commandment over the reason, belief, and understanding of man, which is the highest 58 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. rt of the mind, and giveth law to the will itself. For there is no power on earth which setteth up a throne or chair of estate in the spirits and souls of men, and in their cogita- tions, imaginations, opinions, and beliefs, but knowledge and learning. And therefore we see the detestable and extreme pleasure that arch-heretics, and false prophets, and impostors are transported with, when they once find in themselves that they have a superiority in the faith and conscience of men; sc great as if they have once tasted of it, it is seldom seen that any torture or persecution can make them relinquish or aban- don it. But as this is that which the author of the Revelation calleth the depth or profoundness of Satan, so by argument of contraries, the just and lawful sovereignty over men’s under- standing, by force of truth rightly interpreted, is that which approacheth nearest to the similitude of the divine rule. (4) As for fortune and advancement, the beneficence of learning is not so confined to give fortune only to states and commonwealths, as it doth not likewise give fortune to par- ticular persons. For it was well noted long ago, that Homer hath given more men their livings, than either Sylla, or Czesar, or Augustus ever did, notwithstanding their great lar- gesses and donatives, and distributions of lands to so many legions. And no doubt it is hard to say whether arms or learning have advanced greater numbers. And in case of sovereignty we see, that if arms or descent have carried away the kingdom, yet learning hath carried the priesthood, which ever hath been in some competition with empire. (5) Again, for the pleasure and delight of knowledge and learning, it far surpasseth all other in nature. For, shall the pleasures of the affections so exceed the pleasure of the sense, as much as the obtaining of desire or victory exceedeth a song or a dinner? and must not of consequence the pleasures of the intellect or understanding exceed the pleasures of the affec- tions? We seein all other pleasures there is satiety, and after they be used, their verdure departeth, which showeth well they be but deceits of pleasure, and not pleasures ; and that it was the novelty which pleased, and not the quality. And, therefore, we see that voluptuous men turn friars, and ambitious princes turn melancholy. But of knowledge there is no satiety, but satisfaction and appetite are perpetually interchangeable ; and, therefore, appeareth to be good in itself simply, without fallacy or accident. Neither is that pleasure of small efficacy and contentment to the mind of man, which the poet Lucretius describeth elegantly :— “Suave mari magno, turbantibus equora ventis, Sc,” THE FIRST BOOK. 59 ‘*It is a view of delight,” saith he, ‘‘to stand or walk upon the shore side, and to see a ship tossed with tempest upon the sea; or to be in a fortified tower, and to see two battles join upon a plain. But it is a pleasure incomparable, for the mind. of man to be settled, landed, and fortified in the certainty of truth ; and from thence to descry and behold the errors, per- turbations, labours, and wanderings up and down of other men. (6) Lastly, leaving the vulgar arguments, that by learning man excelleth man in that wherein man excelleth beasts ; that by learning man ascendeth to the heavens and their motions, where in body he cannot come ; and the like: let us conclude with the dignity and excellency of knowledge and learning in that whereunto man’s nature doth most aspire, which is im- mortality or continuance; for to this tendeth generation, and raising of houses and families; to this tend buildings, foundations; and monuments; to this tendeth the desire of memory, fame, and celebration ; and in effect the strength of all other human desires. We see then how far the monuments of wit and learning are more durable than the monuments of power or of the hands. For have not the verses of Homer continued twenty-five hundred years, or more, without the loss of a syllable or letter ; during which time infinite palaces, temples, castles, cities, have been decayed and demolished? It is not possible to have the true pictures or statues of Cyrus, Alexander, Czesar, no nor of the kings or great personages of much later years ; for the originals cannot last, and the copies cannot but leese of the life and truth. But the images of men’s wits and knowledges remain in books, exempted from the wrong of time and capable of perpetual renovation. Neither are they fitly to be called images, hecause they generate still, and cast their seeds in the minds of others, pro- voking and causing infinite actions and opinions in succeeding ages. So that if the invention of the ship was thought so noble, which carrieth riches and commodities from place to place, and consociateth the most remote regions in participa- tion of their fruits, how much more are letters to be magnified, which as ships pass through the vast seas of time, and make ages so distant to participate of the wisdom, illuminations, and inventions, the one of the other? Nay, further, we see some of the philosophers which were least divine, and most immersed in the senses, and denied generally the immortality of the soul, yet came to this point, that whatsoever motions the spirit of man could act and perform without the organs of the body, they thought might remain after death, which were 60 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. only those of the understanding and not of the affection; so immortal and incorruptible a thing did knowledge seem unto them to be. But we, that know by divine revelation that not only the understanding but the affections purified, not only the spirit but the body changed, shall be advanced to immor- tality, do disclaim in these rudiments of the senses. But it must be remembered, both in this last point, and so it may likewise be needful in other places, that in probation of the dignity of knowledge or learning, I did in the beginning separate divine testimony from human, which method I have pursued, and so handled them both apart. (7) Nevertheless I do not pretend, and I know it will be impossible for me, by any pleading of mine, to reverse the judgment, either of A’sop’s cock, that preferred the barleycorn before the gem; or of Midas, that being chosen judge between Apollo, president of the Muses, and Pan, god of the flocks, judged for plenty ; or of Paris, that judged for beauty and love against wisdom and power ; or of Agrippina, occidat matrem, modo imperet, that preferred empire with any condition never so detestable ; or of Ulysses, qui vetulam pretulit immortalitati, being a figure of those which prefer custom and habit before all excellency, or of a number of the like popular judgments. For these things must continue as they have been ; but so will that also continue whereupon learning hath ever relied, and which faileth not: Justijicata est sapientia a filiis suis. THE SECOND BOOK. 61 THE SECOND BOOK. To the King. 1. It might seem to have more convenience, though it come often otherwise to pass (excellent King), that those which are fruitful in their generations, and have in themselves the fore- sight of immortality in their descendants, should likewise be more careful of the good estate of future times, unto which they know they must transmit and commend over their dearest pledges. Queen Elizabeth was a sojourner in the world in respect of her unmarried life, and was a blessing to her own times ; and yet so as the impression of her good government, besides her happy memory, is not without some effect which doth survive her. But to your Majesty, whom God hath already blessed with so much royal issue, worthy to continue and represent you for ever, and whose youthful and fruitful bed doth yet promise many the like renovations, it is proper and agreeable to be conversant not only in the transitory parts of good government, but in those acts also which are in their nature permanent and perpetual. Amongst the which (if affection do not transport me) there is not any more worthy than the further endowment of the world with sound and fruitful knowledge. For why should a few received authors stand up like Hercules’ columns, beyond which there should be no sailing or discovering, since we have so bright and benign a star as your Majesty to conduct and prosper us? To return therefore where we left, it remaineth to consider of what kind those acts are which have been undertaken and performed by kings and others for the increase and advancement of learning, wherein I purpose to speak actively, without digressing or dilating. 2. Let this ground therefore be laid, that all works are over common by amplitude of reward, by soundness of direction, and by the conjunction of labours. The first multiplieth en- deavour, the second preventeth error, and the third supplieth the frailty of man. But the principal of these is direction, for claudus in via antevertit cursorem extra viam ; and Solomon excellently setteth it down, ‘‘If the iron be not sharp, it re- quireth more strength, but wisdom is that which prevaileth,” 62, THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. signifying that the invention or election of the mean is more effectual than any enforcement or accumulation of endeavours. This I am induced to speak, for that (not derogating from the noble intention of any that have been deservers towards the state of learning), I do observe nevertheless that their works and acts are rather matters of magnificence and memory than of progression and proficience, and tend rather to augment the mass of learning in the multitude of learned men than to rectify or raise the sciences themselves. 3. The works or acts of merit towards learning are conversant about three objects—the places of learning, the books of learn- ing, and the persons of the learned. For as water, whether it be the dew of heaven or the springs of the earth, doth scatter and leese itself in the ground, except it be collected into some receptacle where it may by union comfort and sustain itself ; and for that cause the industry of man hath made and framed springheads, conduits, cisterns, and pools, which men have accustomed likewise to beautify and adorn with accom- plishments of magnificence and state, as well as of use and necessity ; so this excellent liquor of knowledge, whether it descend from divine inspiration, or spring from human sense, would soon perish and vanish to oblivion, if it were not pre- served in books, traditions, conferences, and places appointed, as universities, colleges, and schools, for the receipt and com- forting of the same. 4, The works which concern the seats and places of learning are four—foundations and buildings, endowments with re- venues, endowments with franchises and privileges, institutions and ordinances for government—all tending to quietness and rivateness of life, and discharge of cares and troubles; much fico the stations which Virgil prescribeth for the hiving of bees : ‘¢ Principio sedes apibus statioque petenda, Quo neque sit ventis aditus, &c.”’ 5. The works touching books are two—first, libraries, which are as the shrines where all the relics of the ancient saints, full of true virtue, and that without delusion or imposture, are preserved and reposed ; secondly, new editions of authors, with more correct impressions, more faithful translations, more profitable glosses, more diligent annotations, and the like. 6. The works pertaining to the persons of learned men (be+ sides the advancement and countenancing, of them in general) are two—the reward and designation of readers in sciences already extant and invented; and the reward and designation THE SECOND BOOK. 63 of writers and inquirers concerning any parts of learning not sufficiently laboured and prosecuted. 7. These are summarily the works and acts wherein the merits of many excellent princes and other worthy personages have been conversant. As for any particular commemora- tions, I call to mind what Cicero said when he gave general thanks, Difficile non aliquem, ingratum quenquam preterire. Let,us rather, according to the Scriptures, look unto that part of the race which is before us, than look back to that which is already attained. 8. First, therefore, amongst so many great foundations of colleges in Europe, I find strange that they are all dedicated to professions, and none left free to arts and sciences at large. For if men judge that learning should be referred to action, they judge well; but in this they fall into the error described in the ancient fable, in which the other parts of the body did suppose the stomach had been idle, because it neither per- formed the office of motion, as the limbs do, nor of sense, as the head doth; but yet notwithstanding it is the stomach that digesteth and distributeth to all the rest. So if any man think philosophy and universality to be idle studies, he doth not consider that all professions are from thence served and supplied. And this I take to be a great cause that hath hindered the progression of learning, because these funda- mental knowledges have been studied but in passage. For if you will have a tree bear more fruit than it hath used to do, it is not anything you can do to the boughs, but it is the stirring of the earth and putting new mould about the roots that must work it. Neither is it to be forgotten, that this dedicating of foundations and dotations to professory learning hath not only had a malign aspect and influence upon the growth of sciences, but hath also been prejudicial to states and governments. For hence it proceedeth that princes find a solitude in regard of able men to serve them in causes of estate, because there is no education collegiate which is free, where such as were so disposed might give themselves in histories, modern languages, books of policy and civil dis- course, and other the like enablements unto service of estate. 9. And because founders of colleges do plant, and founders of lectures do water, it followeth well in order to speak of the defect which is in public lectures; namely, in the smallness and meanness of the salary or reward which in most places is “assigned unto them, whether they be lectures of arts, or of professions. For it is necessary to the progression of sciences that readers be of the most able and sufficient men; as those 64 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. which are ordained for generating and propagating of sciences, and not for transitory usc. This cannot be, except their con- dition and endowment be such as may content the ablest man to appropriate his whole labour and continue his whole age in that function and attendance; and therefore must have a pro- portion answerable to that mediocrity or competency of ad- vancement, which may be expected from a profession or the practice of a profession. So as, if you will have sciences flourish, you must observe David’s military law, which was, ‘That those which stayed with the carriage should have equal part with those which were in the action ;” else will the car- riages be ill attended. So readers in sciences are indeed the guardians of the stores and provisions of sciences, whence men in active courses are furnished, and therefore ought to have equal entertainment with them ; otherwise if the fathers in sciences be of the weakest sort or be ill maintained, “ Bt patrum invalidi referent jejunia nati.” 10. Another defect I note, wherein I shall need some al- chemist to help me, who call upon men to sell their bocks, and to build furnaces; quitting and forsaking Minerva and the Muses as barren virgins, and relying upon Vulcan. But certain it is, that unto the deep, fruitful, and operative study of many sciences, specially natural philosophy and physic, books be not only the instrumentals ; wherein also the bene- ficence of men hath not been altogether wanting. For we see spheres, globes, astrolabes, maps, and the like, have been pro- vided as appurtenances to astronomy and cosmography, as well as books. We see likewise that some places instituted for physic have annexed the commodity of gardens for simples of all sorts, and do likewise command the use of dead bodies for anatomies. But these do respect but a fewthings. In general, there will hardly be any main proficience in the disclosing of nature, except there be some allowance for expenses about experiments; whether they be experiments appertaining to Vulcanus or Deedalus, furnace or engine, or any other kind. And therefore as secretaries and spials of princes and states bring in bills for intelligence, so you must allow the spials and intelligencers of nature to bring in their bills; or else you shall be ill advertised. 11. And if Alexander made such a liberal assignation to Aristotle of treasure for the allowance of hunters, fowlers, fishers, and the like, that he might compile a history of nature, much better do they deserve it that travail in arts of | nature. THE SECOND BOOK. 65 12. Another defect which I note is an intermission or neglect in those which are governors in universities, of con- sultation, and in princes or superior persons, of visitation : to enter into account and consideration, whether the readings, exercises, and other customs appertaining unto learning, anciently begun and since continued, be well instituted or no : and thereupon to ground an amendment or reformation in that which shall be found inconvenient. For it is one of your Majesty’s own most wise and princely maxims, ‘‘ That in all usages and precedents, the times be considered wherein they first began ; which if they were weak orignorant, it derogateth from the authority of the usage, and leaveth it for suspect.” And therefore inasmuch as most of the usages and orders of the universities were derived from more obscure times, it is the more requisite they be re-examined. In this kind I will give an instance or two, for example sake, of things that are the most obvious and familiar. The one is a matter, which though it be ancient and general, yet I hold to be an error 3 which is, that scholars in universities come too soon and too unripe to logic and rhetoric, arts fitter for graduates than children and novices. For these two, rightly taken, are the gravest of sciences, being the arts of arts; the one for judgment, the other for ornament. And they be the rules and directions how to set forth and dispose matter : and therefore for minds empty and unfraught with matter, and which have not gathered that which Cicero calleth sylva and supellex, stuff and variety, to begin with those arts (as if one should learn to weigh, or to measure, or to paint the wind) doth work but this effect, that the wisdom of those arts, which is great and universal, is almost made contemptible, and is degenerate into childish sophistry and ridiculous affectation. And further, the untimely learning of them hath drawn on by consequence the superficial and unprofitable teaching and writing of them, as fitteth indeed to the capacity of children. Another is a lack I find in the exercises used in the universities, which do make too great a divorce between invention and memory. For their speeches are either premeditate, in verbis conceptis, where nothing is left to invention, or merely extemporal, where little is left to memory. Whereas in life and action there is least use of either of these, but rather of intermixtures of premedi- tation and invention, notes and memory. So as the exercise fitteth not the practice, nor the image the life; and it is ever a true rule in exercises, that they be framed as near as may be to the life of practice; for otherwise they do pervert the motions and faculties of the mind, and not prepare them, o—S4 66 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. The truth whereof is not obscure, when scholars come to the practices of professions, or other actions of civil life ; which when they set into, this want is soon found by themselves, and sooner by others. But this part, touching the amendment of the institutions and orders of universities, I will conclude with the clause of Czsar’s letter to Oppius and Balbes, Hoc quemadmodum fiert possit, nonnulla mihi in mentem veniunt, et multa reperiri possunt: de tis rebus rogo vos ut cogitationem suscipratis. 13. Another defect which I note ascendeth a little higher than the precedent. For as the proficience of learning con- sisteth much in the orders and institutions of universities in the same states and kingdoms, so it would be yet more advanced, if there were more intelligence mutual between the universities of Europe than now there is. We see there be many orders and foundations, which though they be divided under several sovereignties and territories, yet they take themselves to have a kind of contract, fraternity, and correspondence one with the other, insomuch as they have rovincials and generals. And surely as nature createth rotherhood in families, and arts mechanical contract brother- hoods in communalties, and the anointment of God superin- duceth a brotherhood in kings and bishops, so in like manner there cannot but be a fraternity in learning and illumination, relating to that paternity which is attributed to God, who is called the Father of illuminations or lights. 14. The last defect which I will note is, that there hath not been, or very rarely been, any public designation of writers or inquirers concerning such parts of knowledge as may appear not to have been already sufficiently laboured or undertaken ; unto which point it is an inducement to enter into a view and examination what parts of learning have been prosecuted, and what omitted. For the opinion of plenty is amongst the causes of want, and the great quantity of books maketh a | show rather of superfluity than lack ; which surcharge never- theless is not to be remedied by making no more books, but by making more good books, which, as the serpent of Moses, might devour the serpents of the enchanters. 15. The removing of all the defects formerly enumerate, except the last, and of the active part also of the last (which is the designation of writers), are opera basilica ; towards which crossway, that may point at the way, but cannot goit. But -the inducing part of the latter (which is the survey of learn- ing) may be set forward by private travail. Wherefore I will 7 ‘ho Seer @) we CR Oe Oe Oe Td Pe Fe ees ee AY THE SECOND ROOK. 67 how attempt to make a general and faithful perambulation of learning, with an inquiry what parts thereof lie fresh and waste, and not improved and converted by the industry of my puryose is at this time to note only omissions and def- ciences, and not to make any redargution of errors or incom- plete prosecutions, For it is one thing to set forth what ground lieth unmanured, and another thing to correct il] perform myself, or accept from another, that duty of humanity 7 vam qui erranti comiter monstrat viam, dc. I do foresee likewise that of those things which T shall enter and register as deficiences and omissions, many will conceive and censure but curiosities, and things of no great use; and others to be of too great difficulty, and almost Impossibility to be com- passed and effected. But for the two first, I refer myself to the particulars. For the last, touching impossibility, T take it those things are to be held possible which may be done by some though not by private endeavour, But, notwithstanding, if _ any man will take to himself rather that of Solomon, “ Dicit - piger, Leo est in via,” than that of Virgil, “‘ Possunt quia posse _ videntur,” T shall be content that my labours be esteemed but _ as the better sort of wishes ; for as it asketh some knowledge _ todemand a question not impertinent, so it requireth some _ sense to make a wish not absurd, I. (1) The parts of human learning have reference to the three ° ore of man’s understanding, which is the seat of learning ; | history to his memory, poesy to his imagination, and philo-. Sophy to his reason, Divine learning receiveth the same. A distribution ; for the spirit of man is the same, though the 68 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. revelation of oracle and sense be diverse. So as theology con- sisteth also of history of the Church; of parables, which is divine poesy ; and of holy doctrine or precept. For as for that part which seemeth supernumerary, which is prophecy, it is but divine history, which hath that prerogative over human, as the narration may be before the fact as well as after. (2) History is natural, civil, ecclesiastical, and literary ; whereof the first three I allow as extant, the fourth I note es deficient. For no man hath propounded to himself the general state of learning to be described and represented from age to age, as many have done the works of Nature, and the state, civil and ecclesiastical ; without which the history of the world seemeth to me to be as the statue of Polyphemus with his eye out, that part being wanting which doth most show the spirit and life of the person. And yet Iam not ignorant that in divers particular sciences, as of the jurisconsults, the mathema- ticians, the rhetoricians, the philosophers, there are set down some small memorials of the schools, authors, and books ; and so likewise some barren relations touching the invention of arts or usages. But a just story of learning, containing the antiquities and originals of knowledges and their sects, their inventions, their traditions, their diverse administrations and managings, their flourishings, their oppositions, decays, de- pressions, oblivions, removes, with the causes and occasions of them, and all other events concerning learning, throughout the ages of the world, I may truly affirm to be wanting; the use and end of which work1 do not so much design for curiosity or satisfaction of those that are the lovers of learning, but chiefly for a more serious and grave purpose, which is this in few words, that it will make learned men wise in the use and administration of learning. For itis not Saint Augustine’s nor Saint Ambrose’s works that will make so wise a divine as ecclesiastical history thoroughly read and observed, and the same reason is of learning. (3) History of Nature is of three sorts; of Nuture in course, of Nature erring or varying, and of Nature altered or wrought 3. that is, history of creatures, history of marvels, and history of arts. The first of these no doubt is extant, and that in good perfection ; the two latter are handled so weakly and unprofit- ably as I am moved to note them as deficient. For I find no sufficient or competent collection of the works of Nature which have a digression and deflexion from the ordinary course of generations, productions, and motions; whether they be’ singularities of place and region, or the strange events of time and chance, or the effects of yet unknown properties, or the THE SECOND BOOK. 69 instances of exception to general kinds. It is true I find a number of books of fabulous experiments and secrets, and frivolous impostures for pleasure and strangeness; but a sub- stantial and severe collection of the heteroclites or irregulars of Nature, well examined and described, I find not, specially not with due rejection of fables and popular errors. For as things now are, if an untruth in Nature be once on foot, what by reason of the neglect of examination, and countenance of antiquity, and what by reason of the use of the opinion in similitudes and ornaments of speech, it is never called down. (4) The use of this work, honoured with a precedent in Aristotle, is nothing less than to give contentment to the appetite of curious and vain wits, as the manner of Mirabilaries is to do; but for two reasons, both of great weight: the one to correct the partiality of axioms and opinions, which are commonly framed only upon common and familiar examples; the other because from the wonders of Nature is the nearest intelligence and passage towards the wonders of art, for it is no more but by following and, as it were, hounding Nature in her wanderings, to be able to lead her afterwards to the same place again. Neither am I of opinion, in this history of marvels, that superstitious narrations of sorceries, witchcrafts, dreams, divinations, and the like, where there is an assurance and clear evidence of the fact, be altogether excluded. For it is not yet known in what cases and how far effects attributed to supersti- tion do participate of natural causes; and, therefore, howso- ever the practice of such things is to be condemned, yet from the speculation and consideration of them light may be taken, not only for the discerning of the offences, but for the further disclosing of Nature. Neither ought a man to make scruple of entering into these things for inquisition of truth, as your Majesty hath showed in your own example, who, with the two clear eyes of religion and natural philosophy, have looked deeply and wisely into these shadows, and yet proved yourself to be of the nature of the sun, which passeth through pollu- tions and itself remains as pure as before. But thisI hold fit, that these narrations, which have mixture with superstition, be sorted by themselves, and not to be mingled with the narra- tions which are merely and sincerely natural. But as for the narrations touching the prodigies and miracles of religions, they are either not true or not natural; and, therefore, im- pertinent for the story of Nature. (5) For history of Nature, wrought or mechanical, I find some collections made of agriculture, and likewise of manual arts; but commonly with a rejection of experiments familiar 70 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. and vulgar ; for itis esteemed a kind of dishonour unto learn- ing to descend to inquiry or meditation upon matters mechanical, except they be such as may be thought secrets, rarities, and special subtleties ; which humour of vain and as eed arrogancy is justly derided in Plato, where he rings in touching beauty, Socrates, after his wandering manner of in- ductions, put first an example of a fair virgin, and then of a fair horse, and then of a fair pot well glazed, whereat Hippias was offended, and said, “‘ More than for courtesy’s sake, he did think much to dispute with any that did allege such base and sordid instances.” Whereunto Socrates answereth, ‘‘ You have reason, and it becomes you well, being a man so trim in ‘your vestments,” &c., and so goeth on in an irony. But the truth is, they be not the highest instances that give the securest information, as may be well expressed in the tale so common of the philosopher that, while he gazed upwards to the stars, fell into the water; for if he had looked down he might have seen the stars in the water, put looking aloft he could not see the water in the stars. So it cometh often to pass that mean and small things discover great, better than great can discover the small; and therefore Aristotle noteth well, ‘‘ That the nature of everything is best seen in his smallest portions.” And for that cause he inquireth the nature of a commonwealth, first in a family, and the simple conjugations of man and wife, parent and child, master and servant, which are in every cottage. Even so likewise the nature of this great city of the world, and the ‘policy thereof, must be first sought in mean concordances and small portions. So we see how that secret of Nature, of the turning of iron touched with the loadstone to- wards the north, was found out in needles of iron, not in bars of iron. (6) But if my judgment be of any weight, the use of history mechanical is of all others the most radical and fundamental towards natural philosophy ; such natural philosophy as shall not vanish in the fume of subtle, sublime, or delectable specu- lation, but such as shall be operative to the endowment and benefit of man’s life. For it will not only minister and suggest for the present many ingenious practices in all trades, by a connection and transferring of the observations of one art to the use of another, when the experiences of several mysteries shall fall under the consideration of one man’s mind; but further, it will give a more true and real illumination concern- ing causes and axioms than is hitherto attained. For like asa ia ee Md a ee ee pe ee, ee ee THE SECOND BOOK. 71 man’s disposition is never well known till he be crossed, nor Proteus ever changed shapes till he was straitened and held fast ; so the passages and variations of nature cannot appear so fully in the liberty of nature as in the triais and vexations of art. II. (1) For civil history, it is of three kinds ; not urffitly to be compared with the three kinds of pictures or images. For of pictures or images we see some are unfinished, some are perfect, and some are defaced. So of histories we may find three kinds: memorials, perfect histories, and antiquities; for memorials are history unfinished, or the first or rough drafts of history; and antiquities are history defaced, or some remnants of history which have casually escaped the shipwreck of time. of the naked events and actions, without the motives or designs, the counsels, the speeches, the pretexts, the occasions, and other passages of action. For this is the true nature of a commentary (though Cesar, in modesty mixed with greatness, did for his pleasure apply the name of a commentary to the best history of the world). Registers are collections of public acts, as decrees of council, judicial proceedings, declarations and letters of estate, orations, and the like, without a perfect continuance or contexture of the thread of the narration. (3) Antiquities, or remnants of history, are, as was said, tanquam tabula naufragii : when industrious persons, by an exact and scrupulous diligence and observation, out of monu- me:.ts, names, words, proverbs, traditions, private records and evidences, fragments of stories, passages of books that concern not story, and the like, do save and recover somewhat from (4) In these kinds of unperfect histories I do assign no deficience, for they are tanquam imperfecte mista ; and there- fore any deficience in them is but their nature. Ass for the corruptions and moths of history, which are epitomes, the use of them deserveth to be banished, as all men of sound judg- ment have confessed, as those that have fretted and corroded the sound bodies of many excellent histories, and wrought them into base and unprofitable dregs, 5) History, which may be called just and perfect history, is of three kinds, according to the object which it propoundeth, or pretendeth to represent: for it either representeth a time, or a person, or an action. The first we call chronicles, the 72 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. second lives, and the third narrations or relations. Of these, although the first be the most complete and absolute kind of history, and hath most estimation and glory, yet the second excelleth it in profit and use, and the third in verity and sincerity. For history of times representeth the magnitude of actions, and the public faces and deportments of persons, and passeth over in silence the smaller passages and motions of men and matters. But such being the workmanship of God, as He doth hang the greatest weight upon the smallest wires, maxima & minimis, suspendens, it comes therefore to pass, that such histories do rather set forth the pomp of business than the true and inward resorts thereof. But lives, if they be well written, propounding to themselves a person to represent, in whom actions, both greater and smaller, public and private, have a commixture, must of necessity contain a more true, native, and lively representation. So again narrations and relations of actions, as the war of Peloponnesus, the expedition of Cyrus Minor, the conspiracy of Catiline, cannot but be more purely and exactly true than histories of times, because they may choose an argument comprehensible within the notice and instructions of the writer : whereas he that undertaketh the story of a time, specially of any length, cannot but meet with many blanks and spaces, which he must be forced to fill up out of his own wit and conjecture. (6) For the history of times, I mean of civil history, the providence of God hath made the distribution. For it hath pleased God to ordain and illustrate two exemplar states of the world for arms, learning, moral virtue, policy, and laws; the state of Grecia and the state of Rome ; the histories whereof occupying the middle part of time, have more ancient to them (7) Now to speak of the deficiences. As to the heathen antiquities of the world ; itis in vain to note them for deficient. Deficient they are no doubt, consisting most of fables and fragments ; but the deficience cannot be holpen ; for antiquity is xe fame, caput inter nubila condit, her head is muffled from our sight. For the history of the exemplar states, it is extant in good perfection. Not but I could wish there were @ perfect course of history for Grecia, from Theseus to Philopeemen (what time the affairs of Grecia drowned and extinguished in the affairs of Rome), and for Rome from Romulus to Justinianus, who may be truly said to be ultimus Romanorum. In which sequences of story the text of Thucydides and Xenophon in THE SECOND BOOK. 73 the one, and the texts of Livius, Polybius, Sallustius, Cesar, Appianus, Tacitus, Herodianus in the other, to be kept entire, without any diminution at all, and only to be supplied and continued. But this isa matter of magnificence, rather to be commended than required; and we speak now of parts of learning supplemental, and not of supererogation. (8) But for modern histories, whereof there are some few very worthy, but the greater part beneath mediocrity, leaving the care of foreign stories to foreign states, because I will not be curiosus in aliena republica, I cannot fail to represent to your Majesty the unworthiness of the history of England in the main continuance thereof, and the partiality and obliquity of that of Scotland in the latest and largest author that T have seen: supposing that it would be honour for your Majesty, and a work very memorable, if this island of Great Britain, as it is now joined in monarchy for the ages to come, so were joined in one history for the times passed, after the manner of the sacred history, which draweth down the story of the ten tribes and of the two tribes as twins together. And if it shall seem that the greatness of this work may make it less exactly performed, there is an excellent period of a much smaller compass of time, as to the story of England ; that is to say, from the uniting of the Roses to the uniting of the king- doms ; a portion of time wherein, to my understanding, there hath been the rarest varieties that in like number of successions of any hereditary monarchy hath been known. For it beginneth with the mixed adeption of a crown by arms and title; an entry by battle, an establishment by marriage ; and therefore times answerable, like waters after a tempest, full of working and swelling, though without extremity of storm; but well passed through by the wisdom of the pilot, being one of the most sufficient kings of all the number. Then followeth the reign of a king, whose actions, howsoever conducted, had much intermixture with the affairs of Europe, balancing and inclining them variably ; in whose time also began that great alteration in the state ecclesiastical, an action which seldom cometh upon the stage. Then the reign of a minor; then an offer of a usurpation (though it was but as febris ephemera). Then the reign of a queen matched with a foreigner ; then of a queen that lived solitary and unmarried, and yet her government so masculine, as it had greater impression and operation upon the states abroad than it any ways received from thence. And now last, this most happy and glorious event, that this island of Britain, divided from all the world, should be united in itself, and that oracle of rest given ‘to Aineas, antiquam C84 74 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. exquirite matrem, should now be performed and fulfilled upon the nations of England and Scotland, being now reunited in the ancient mother name of Britain, as a full period of all instability and peregrinations. So that as it cometh to pass in massive bodies, that they have certain trepidations and waver- ings before they fix and settle, so_ it seemeth that by the providence of God this monarchy, before it was to settle in your majesty and your generations (in which I hope it is now established for ever), it had these prelusive changes and varieties. (9) For lives, I do find strange that these times have so little esteemed the virtues of the times, as that the writings of lives should be no more frequent. For although there be not many sovereign princes or absolute commanders, and that states are most collected into monarchies, yet are there many worthy personages that deserve better than dispersed report or barren elogies. For herein the invention of one of the late poets is proper, and doth well enrich the ancient fiction. For he feigneth that at_ the end of the thread or web of every man’s life there was a little medal containing the person’s name, and that Time waited upon the shears, and as soon as the thread. was cut caught the medals, and carried them to the river of Lethe; and about the bank there were many birds flying up and down, that would get the medals and carry them in their beak a little while, and then let them fall into the river. Only there were a few swans, which if they got a name would carry it to a temple where it was consecrate. And although many men, more mortal in their affections than in their bodies, do esteem desire of name and memory but as a vanity and ventosity, “ Animi nil magnee laudis egentes ;” which opinion cometh from that root, Non prius laudes con- tempsimus, quam laudanda facere desivimus : yet that will not alter Solomon’s judgment, Memoria justi cum laudibus, a impiorum nomen putrescet: the one flourisheth, the other either consumeth to present oblivion, or turneth to an il odour. And therefore in that style or addition, which is and hath been long well received and brought in use, felicis memorice, pice memorie, bone memoria, we do acknowledge that which Cicero saith, borrowing it from Demosthenes, that bona fama propria possessio defunctorum ; which possession I cannot but note that in our times it lieth much waste, and that therein there is a deficience. ‘ (10) For narrations and relations of particular actions, there ) THE SECOND BOOK, yt: were also to be wished @ greater diligence therein ; for there ig no great action but hath some good pen which attends it, because it is an ability not common to write a Sood history, as may well appear by the small number of them 3 yet if par- when time should serve, (11) There ig yet another partition of history which Cornelius 8 maketh, which is not to be orgotten, Sbeciaily with that application which he accoupleth it¢ Withal, annajs and Um ex dignitate populs nt repertum Sit, res illustres annalibus, talia diurnis urbis actis mandare, So as there ig a ind of contemplative heraldry, AS well as civil, And as aemory, with politic discourse and observation thereupon ; ot incorporate into the history, but Separately, and as the ore principal in their intention ; which kind ‘of ruminated istory I think More fit to place amongst books of Policy, Story. For it is the true office of history to represent the ents themselves together with the counsels, and to leave the 76 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. ‘ observations and conclusions thereupon to the liberty and faculty of every man’s judgment. But mixtures are things irregular, whereof no man can define. (18) So also is there another kind of history manifoldly mixed, and that is history of cosmography : being compounded of natural history, in respect of the regions themselves; of history civil, in respect of the habitations, regiments, and manners of the people; and the mathematics, in respect of the climates and configurations towards the heavens: which part of learning of all others in this latter time hath obtained most proficience. For it may be truly affirmed to the honour of these times, and in a virtuous emulation with antiquity, that this great building of the world had never through-lights made in it, till the age of us and our fathers. For although they had knowledge of the antipodes, **Nosque ubi primus equis Oriens afflavit anhelis, Illic sera rubens accendit lumina Vesper,” yet that might be by demonstration, and not in fact ; and if by travel, it requireth the voyage but of half the globe. But to circle the earth, as the heavenly bodies do, was not done nor enterprised till these later times: and therefore these times may justly bear in their word, not only plus ultra, in prece- dence of the ancient non ultra, and tmitabile fulmen, in precedence of the ancient non tmitabile fulmen, ““Demens qui nimbos et non imitabile fulmen,” &c. but likewise imitabile celum ; in respect of the many memorable voyages after the manner of heaven about the globe of the earth. (14) And this proficience in navigation and discoveries may plant also an expectation of the further proficience and augmen- tation of all sciences ; because it may seem they are ordained by God to be coevals, that is, to meet in one age. For so the prophet Daniel speaking of the latter times foretelleth, Plurimi pertransibunt, et multiplex erit scientia : as if the openness and through-passage of the world and the increase of knowledge were appointed to be in the same ages ; as we see it is already performed in great part: the learning of these later times not much giving place to the former two periods or returns of learning, the one of the Grecians, the other of the Romans. III. (1) History ecclesiastical receiveth the same division with history civil: but further in the propriety thereof may b divided into the history of the Church, by a general name THE SECOND BOOK. a7 history of prophecy; and history of providence. The first describeth the times of the militant Church, whether it be fluctuant, as the ark of Noah, or movable, as the ark in the wilderness, or at rest, as the ark in the Temple? that is, the state of the Church in persecution, in remove, and in peace. This part I ought in no sort to note as deficient ; only I would that the virtue and sincerity of it were according to the mass and quantity. But I am not now in hand with censures, but with omissions. (2) The second, which is history of prophecy, consisteth of two relatives—the prophecy and the accomplishment ; and, therefore, the nature of such a work ought to be, that every prophecy of the Scripture be sorted with the event fulfilling the same throughout the ages of the world, both for the better con- firmation of faith and for the better illumination of the Church touching those parts of prophecies which are yet unfulfilled : allowing, nevertheless, that latitude which is agreeable and familiar unto divine prophecies, being of the nature of their Author, with whom a thousand years are but as one day, and therefore are not fulfilled punctually at once, but have springing and germinant accomplishment throughout many ages, though the height or fulness of them may refer to some one age. This is a work which I find deficient, but is to be done with wisdom, sobriety, and reverence, or not at all. (3) The third, which is history of Providence, containeth that excellent correspondence which is between God’s revealed will and His secret will; which though it be so obscure, as for the most part it is not legible to the natural man—no, nor many _ times to those that behold it from the tabernacle—yet, at some times it pleaseth God, for our better establishment and the confuting of those which are as without God in the world, to write it in such text and capital letters, that, as the prophet saith, ‘‘ He thatrunneth by may read it ”—that is, mere sensual persons, which hasten by God’s judgments, and never bend or tix their cogitations upon them, are nevertheless in their passage and race urged to discern it. Such are the notable events and examples of God’s judgments, chastisements, deliverances, and blessings ; and this is a work which has passed through the labour of many, and therefore I cannot present as omitted. (4) There are also other parts of learning which are ap- pendices to history. For all the exterior proceedings of man consist of words and deeds, whereof history doth properly re- ceive and retain in memory the deeds ; and if words, yet but as inducements and passages to deeds; so are there other books and writings which are appropriate to the custody and receipt e 78 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. of words only, which likewise are of three sorts—orations, letters, and brief speeches or sayings. Orations are pleadings, speeches of counsel, laudatives, invectives, apologies, reprehen- sions, orations of formality or ceremony, and the like. Letters are according to all the variety of occasions, advertisements, advices, directions, propositions, petitions, commendatory, ex- postulatory, satisfactory, of compliment, of pleasure, of dis- course, and all other passages of action. And such as are written from wise men, are of all the words of man, in my judgment, the best; for they are more natural than orations and public speeches, and more advised than conferences or present speeches. So again letters of affairs from such as manage them, or are privy to them, are of all others the best instructions for history, and to a diligent reader the best histories in themselves. For apophthegms, it is a great loss of that book of Czesar’s ; for as his history, and those few letters of his which we have, and those apophthegms which were of his own, excel all men’s else, so I suppose would his collection of apophthegms have done; for as for those which are collected by others, either T have no taste in such matters or else their choice hath not been happy. But upon these three kinds of writings I do not insist, because I have no deficiences to propound concerning them. (5) Thus much therefore concerning history, which is that part of learning which answereth to one of the cells, domiciles, or offices of the mind of man, which is that of the memory. IV. (1) Poesy is a part of learning in measure of words, for the most part restrained, but in all other points extremely licensed, and doth truly refer to the imagination ; which, being - not tied to the laws of matter, may at pleasure join that which nature hath severed, and sever that which nature hath joined, and so make unlawful matches and divorces of things-—Pictori- bus atque poetis, dc. It is taken in two senses in respect of words or matter. In the first sense, it is but a character of style, and belongeth to arts of speech, and is not pertinent for the present. In the latter, it is—as hath been said—one of the principal portions of learning, and is nothing else but feigned history, which may be styled as well in prose as in verse. (2) The use of this feigned history hath been to give some shadow of satisfaction to the mind of man in those points wherein the nature of things doth deny it, the world being in proportion inferior to the soul; by reason whereof there is, agreeable to the spirit of man, a more ample greatness, a more exact gocdness, and a more absolute variety, than can be found in the nature of things. Therefore, because the acts or events e THE SECOND BOOK. ; 79 of true history have not that magnitude which satisfieth the mind of man, poesy feigneth acts and events greater and more heroical. Because true history propoundeth the successes and issues of actions not so agreeable to the merits of virtue and vice, therefore poesy feigns them more just in retribution, and more according to revealed Providence. Because true history representeth actions and events more ordinary and less inter. changed, therefore poesy endueth them with more rareness and more unexpected and alternative variations. So as it appeareth that poesy serveth and conferreth to magnanimity, morality, and to delectation. And therefore, it was ever thought to have some participation of divineness, because it doth raise and erect the mind, by submitting the shows of things to the desires of the mind ; whereas reason doth buckle and bow the mind unto the nature of things. And we see that by these insinuations and congruities with man’s nature and pleasure, joined also with the agreement and consort it hath with music, it hath had access and estimation in rude times and barbarous regions, where other learning stood excluded. (3) The division of poesy which is aptest in the propriety thereof (besides those divisions which are common unto it with history, as feigned chronicles, feigned lives, and the appendices of history, as feigned epistles, feigned orations, and the rest) is into poesy narrative, representative, and allusive. The narra- tive is a mere imitation of history, with the excesses before remembered, choosing for subjects commonly wars and love, rarely state, and sometimes pleasure or mirth. Representative is as a visible history, and is an image of actions asif they were present, as history is of actions in nature as they are (that is) past. Allusive, or parabolical, is a narration applied only to express some special purpose or conceit ; which latter kind of parabolical wisdom was much more in use in the ancient times, as by the fables of A‘sop, and the brief sentences of the seven, and the use of hieroglyphics may appear. And the cause was (for that it was then of necessity to express any point of reason which was more sharp or subtle than the vulgar in that manner} because men in those times wanted both variety of examples and subtlety of conceit. And as hieroglyphics were before letters so parables were before arguments ; and nevertheless now an at all times they do retain much life and vigour, because reason cannot be so sensible nor examples so fit. (4) But there remaineth yet another use of poesy parabolical, opposite to that which we last mentioned ; for that tendeth to demonstrate and illustrate that which is taught or delivered, and this other to retire and obscure it—that is, when the secrets 80 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. and mysteries of religion, policy, or philosophy, are involved in fables or parables. Of this in divine poesy we see the use is authorised. In heathen poesy we see the exposition of fables doth fall out sometimes with great felicity : as in the fable that the giants being overthrown in their war against the gods, the earth their mother in revenge thereof brought forth Fame: ‘«Tilam terra parens, ira irritata Deorum, Extremam, ut perhibent, Coeo Enceladoque sororem, Progenuit.” Expounded that when princes and monarchs have suppressed actual and open rebels, then the malignity of people (which is the mother of rebellion) doth bring forth libels and slanders, ~ and taxations of the states, which is of the same kind with rebellion, but more feminine. So in the fable that the rest of the gods having conspired to bind Jupiter, Pallas called Briareus with his hundred hands to his aid: expounded that monarchies need not fear any curbing of their absoluteness by mighty sub- jects, as long as by wisdom they keep the hearts of the people, who will be sure to come in on their side. So in the fable that Achilles was brought up under Chiron, the centaur, who was part a man and part a beast, expounded ingeniously but cor- ruptly by Machiavel, that it belongeth to the education and discipline of princes to know as well how to play the part of a lion in violence, and the fox in guile, as of the man in virtue and justice. Nevertheless, in many the like encounters, I do rather think that the fable was first, and the exposition devised, than that the moral was first, and thereupon the fable framed ; for I find it was an ancient vanity in Chrysippus, that troubled himself with great contention to fasten the assertions of the Stoics upon the fictions of the ancient poets; but yet that all the fables and fictions of the poets were but pleasure and not figure, 1 interpose no opinion. Surely of those poets which are now extant, even Homer himself (notwithstanding he was made a kind of scripture by the later schools of the Grecians), yet I should without any difficulty pronounce that his fables had no such inwardness in his own meaning. But what they might have upon a more original tradition is not easy to affirm, for he was not the inventor of many of them. (5) In this third part of learning, which is poesy, I can report no deficience ; for being as a plant that cometh of the lust of the earth, without a formal seed, it hath sprung up and spread abroad more than any other kind. But to ascribe unto it that which is due, for the expressing of affections, passions, corrup- THE SECOND BOOK. 8] tions, and customs, we are beholding to poets more than to the philosophers’ works ; and for wit and eloquence, not much less than to orators’ harangues. But it is not good to stay too long in the theatre. Let us now pass on to the judicial place or palace of the mind, which we are to approach and view with more reverence and attention. V. (1) The knowledge of man is as the waters, some de- scending from above, and some springing from beneath: the one informed by the light of nature, the other inspired by divine revelation. The light of nature consisteth in the no- tions of the mind and the reports of the senses; for as for knowledge which man receiveth by teaching, it is cumulative and not original, as in a water that besides his own spring-head is fed with other springs and streams. So then, according to these two differing illuminations or originals, knowledge is first of all divided into divinity and philosophy. (2) In philosophy the contemplations of man do either pene- trate unto God, or are circumferred to nature, or are reflected or reverted upon himself. Out of which several inquiries there do arise three knowledges—divine philosophy, natural philosophy, and human philosophy or humanity. For all things are marked and stamped with this triple character—of the power of God, the difference of nature and the use of man. But because the distributions and partitions of knowledge are not like several lines that meet in one angle, and so touch but in a point, but are like branches of a tree that meet in a stem, which hath a dimension and quantity of entireness and con- tinuance before it come to discontinue and break itself into arms and boughs; therefore it is good, before we enter into the former distribution, to erect and constitute one universal science, by the name of philosophia prima, primitive or sum- mary philosophy, as the main and common way, before we come where the ways part and divide themselves ; which science whether I should report as deficient or no, I stand doubtful. For I find a certain rhapsody of natural theology, and of divers parts of logic; and of that part of natural philosophy which con- cerneth the principles, and of that other part of natural philo- sophy which concerneth the soul or spirit—all these strangely commixed and confused; but being examined, it seemeth to me rather a depredation of other sciences, advanced and exalted unto some height of terms, than anything solid or substantive of itself. Nevertheless I cannot be ignorant of the distinction which is current, that the same things are handled but ir several respects. As for example, that logic considereth of many things as they are in notion, and this philosophy as they 82 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. are in nature—the one in appearance, the other in existence ; but I find this difference better made than pursued. For if they had considered quantity, similitude, diversity, and the rest of those extern characters of things, as philosophers, and in nature, their inquiries must of force have been of a far other kind than they are. For doth any of them, in handling quantity, speak of the force of union, how and how far it multiplieth virtue? Doth any give the reason why some things in nature are so common, and in so great mass, and others so rare, and in so small quantity? Doth any, in hand- ling similitude and diversity, assign the cause why iron should not move to iron, which is more like, but move to the load- stone, which is less like? Why in all diversities of things there should be certain participles in nature which are almost ambiguous to which kind they should be referred? But there is a mere and deep silence touching the nature and operation of those common adjuncts of things, as in nature ; and: only a resuming and repeating of the force and use of them in speech or argument. Therefore, because in a writing of this nature I avoid all subtlety, my meaning touching this original or uni- versal philosophy is thus, in a plain and gross description by negative: “That it be a receptacle for all such profitable ob- servations and axioms as fall not within the compass of any of the special parts of philosophy or sciences, but are more common and of a higher stage.” (3) Now that there are many of that kind need not be doubted. For example : Isnot the rule, Si inequalibus equalia addas, omnia erunt inequalia, an axiom as well of justice as of the mathematics? and is there not a true coincidence be- tween commutative and distributive justice, and arithmetical and geomcérical proportion? Is not that other rule, Que in eodem terlio conveniunt, et inter se conveniunt, a rule taken from the mathematics, but so potent in logic as all syllogisms are built upon it? Is not the observation, Omnia mutantur, nil interit, a contemplation in philosophy thus, that the quan- tum of nature is eternal? in natural theology thus, that it requireth the same omnipotency to make somewhat nothing, which at the first made nothing somewhat? according to the Scripture, Didict quod omnia opera, que fecit Deus, perse- verent in perpetuum ; non possumuUs eis quicquam addere nec auferre. Is not the ground, which Machiavel wisely and largely discourseth concerning governments, that the way to establish and preserve them is to reduce them ad principia—a rule in religion and nature, as well as in civil administration ? Was not the Persian magic a reduction or correspondence of THE SECOND BOOK. 83 the principles and architectures of nature to the rules and policy of governments? Is not the precept of a musician, to fall from a discord or harsh accord upon a concord or sweet accord, alike true in affection? Is not the trope of music, to avoid or slide from the close or cadence, common with the trope of rhetoric of deceiving expectation? Is not the delight of the quavering upon a stop in music the same with the playing of light upon the water ? **Splendet tremulo sub lumine pontus,” Are not the organs of the senses of one kind with the organs of reflection, the eye with a glass, the ear with a cave or strait, determined and bounded? Neither are these only similitudes, as men of narrow observation may conceive them to be, but the same footsteps of nature, treading or printing upon several subjects or matters. This science therefore (as I understand it) I may justly report as deficient ; for I see sometimes the profounder sort of wits, in handling some particular argument, will now and then draw a bucket of water out of this well for their present use; but the spring-head thereof seemeth to me not to have been visited, being of so excellent use both for the disclosing of nature and the abridgment of art. VI. (1) This science being therefore first placed as a common parent like unto Berecynthia, which had so much heavenly issue, omnes celicolas, omnes supera alta tenentes; we may return to the former distribution of the three philosophies—- divine, natural, and human. And as concerning divine philo- Sophy or natural theology, it is that knowledge or rudiment of knowledge concerning God which may be obtained by the con- templation of His creatures; which knowledge may be truly termed divine in respect of the object, and natural in respect of the light. The bounds of this knowledge are, that it suf- ficeth to convince atheism, but not to inform religion ; and therefore there was never miracle wrought by God to convert an atheist, because the light of nature might have led him to confess a God; but miracles have been wrought to convert idolaters and the superstitious, because no light of nature ex- tendeth to declare the will and true worship of God. For as all works do show forth the power and skill of the workman, and not his image, so it is of the works of God, which do show the omnipotency and wisdom of the Maker, but not His image. And therefore therein the heathen opinion differeth from the sacred truth: for they supposed the world to be the image of God, and man to be an extract or compendious image of the 84, THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. world; but the Scriptures never vouchsafe to attribute to the world that honour, as to be the image of God, but only the work of His hands ; neither do they speak of any other image of God but man. Wherefore by the contemplation of nature to induce and enforce the acknowledgment of God, and to demonstrate His power, providence, and goodness, is an excel- lent argument, and hath been excellently handled by divers. But on the other side, out of the contemplation of nature, or ground of human knowledges, to induce any verity or persua- sion concerning the points of faith, is in my judgment not safe; Da fidei que fidei sunt. For the heathen themselves conclude as much in that excellent and divine fable of the golden chain, “‘ That men and gods were not able to draw Jupiter down to the earth ; but, contrariwise, Jupiter was able to draw them up to heaven.” So as we ought not to attempt to draw down or submit the mysteries of God to our reason, but contrariwise to raise and advance our reason to the divine truth. So asin this part of knowledge, touching divine philo- sophy, I am so far from noting any deficience, as I rather note an excess; whereunto I have digressed because of the extreme prejudice which both religion and philosophy hath received and may receive by being commixed together ; as that which undoubtedly will make an heretical religion, and an imaginary and fabulous philosophy. (2) Otherwise it is of the nature of angels and spirits, which is an appendix of theology, both divine and natural, and is neither inscrutable nor interdicted. For although the Scrip- ture saith, ‘‘Let no man deceive you in sublime discourse touching the worship of angels, pressing into that he knoweth not,” &c., yet notwithstanding if you observe well that pre- cept, it may appear thereby that there be two things only forbidden—adoration of them, and opinion fantastical of them, either to extol them further than appertaineth to the degree of a creature, or to extol a man’s knowledge of them further than he hath ground. But the sober and grounded inquiry, which may arise out of the passages of Holy Scriptures, or out of the gradations of nature, is not restrained. So of de- generate and revolted spirits, the conversing with them or the employment of them is prohibited, much more any veneration towards them; but the contemplation or science of their nature, their power, their illusions, either by Scripture or reason, is a part of spiritual wisdom. For so the apostle saith, ‘‘ We are not ignorant of his stratagems.” And it is no more unlawful to inquire the nature of evil spirits, than to inquire the force of poisons in nature, or the nature of sin THE SECOND BOOK. 85 and vice in morality. But this part touching angels and spirits I cannot note as deficient, for many have occupied themselves in it; I may rather challenge it, in many of the writers thereof, as fabulous and fantastical. VII. (1) Leaving therefore divine philosophy or natural the- ology (not divinity’or inspired theology, which we reserve for the last of all as the haven and sabbath of all man’s contem- plations) we will now proceed to natural philosophy. If then it be true that Democritus said, ‘‘ That the truth of nature lieth hid in certain deep mines and caves;” and if it be true likewise that the alchemists do so much inculcate, that Vulcan 86 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. perspicuous expressing of that I do propound, I am otherwise zealous and affectionate to recede as little from antiquity, either in terms or opinions, as may stand with truth and the proficience of knowledge. And herein I cannot a little marvel at the philosopher Aristotle, that did proceed in such a spirit of difference and contradiction towards all antiquity ; under- taking not only to frame new words of science at pleasure, but to confound and extinguish all ancient wisdom ; insomuch as he never nameth or mentioneth an ancient author or opinion, but to confute and reprove; wherein for glory, and drawing followers and disciples, he took the right course. For certainly there cometh to pass, and hath place in human truth, that which was noted and pronounced in the highest truth :—Veni in nomine patris, nec recipitis me ; si quis venerit in nomine suo eum recipietis. But in this divine aphorism (considering to whom it was applied, namely, to antichrist, the highest de- ceiver), we may discern well that the coming in a man’s own name, without regard of antiquity or paternity, is no good sign of truth, although it be joined with the fortune and success of an eum recipietis. But for this excellent person Aristotle, I will think of him that he learned that humour of his scholar, with whom it seemeth he did emulate; the one to conquer all opinions, as the other to conquer all nations. erein, nevertheless, it may be, he may at some men’s hands, that are of a bitter disposition, get a like title as his scholar did :— : ‘* Felix terrarum predo, non utile mundo Editus exemplum, &c.” So, ‘* Felix doctrine prado.” But to me, on the other side, that do desire as much as lieth in my pen to ground a sociable intercourse between antiquity and proficience, it seemeth best to keep way with antiquity usque ad aras; and, therefore, to retain the ancient terms, though I sometimes alter the uses and definitions, according to the moderate proceeding in civil government; where, al- though there be some alteration, yet that holdeth which Tacitus wisely noteth, ealem magistratuum vocabula. (3) To return, therefore, to the use and acception of the term metaphysic as I do now understand the word; it ap- peareth, by that which hath been already said, that I intend paorognic, prima, summary philosophy and metaphysic, which eretofore have been confounded as one, to be two distinct THE SECOND BOOK. 87 things. For the one I have made as a parent or common ) ancestor to all knowledge; and the other I have now brought in as a branch or descendant of natural science. Tt appeareth likewise that I have assigned to summary philosophy the common principles and axioms which are promiscuous and in- different to several sciences ; I have assigned unto it likewise the inquiry touching the operation or the relative and adven- tive characters of essences, as quantity, similitude, diversity, possibility, and the rest, with this distinction and provision ; that they be handled as they have efficacy in nature, and not logically. It appeareth likewise that natural theology, which heretofore hath been handled confusedly with metaphysic, I have enclosed and bounded by itself. It is therefore now a question what is left remaining for metaphysic ; wherein I may without prejudice preserve thus much of the conceit of anti- quity, that physic should contemplate that which is inherent in matter, and therefore transitory ; and metaphysic that which is abstracted and fixed. And again, that physic should handle that which supposeth in nature only a being and moving ; and metaphysic should handle that which supposeth further in nature a reason, understanding, and platform. But the difference, perspicuously expressed, is most familiar and sensible. For as we divided natural philosophy in general into the inquiry of causes and productions of effects, so that part which concerneth the inquiry of causes we do subdivide accord- ing to the received and sound division of causes. The one part, which is physic, inquireth and handleth the material and efficient causes ; and the other, which is metaphysic, handleth the formal and final causes. (4) Baga Cae Te ording to the derivation, and not according to our idiom for medicine) is situate in a middle term or distance between natural history and metaphysic. For natural history describeth the variety of things; physic the - causes, but variable or respective causes ; and metaphysic the fixed and constant causes. “‘Limus ut hic durescit, et hee ut cera liquescit, Uno eodemque igni.” Fire is the cause of induration, but respective to clay ; fire is the cause of colliquation, but respective to wax. But fire is no constant cause either of induration or colliquation ; so then the physical causes are but the efficient and the matter, Physic hath three parts, whereof ¢wo respect nature united or collected, the third ccutemplateth nature diffused or coat 88 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. distributed. Nature is collected either into one entire total, or else into the same principles or seeds. So as the first doctrine is touching the contexture or configuration of things, as de mundo, de universitate rerum. The second is the doctrine concerning the principles or originals of things. The third is the doctrine concerning all variety and particularity of things; whether it be of the differing substances, or their differing qualities and natures; whereof there needeth no enumeration, this part being but as a gloss or paraphrase that attendeth upon the text of natural history. Of these three I cannot report any as deficient. In what truth or perfec*ion they are handled, I make not now any judgment ; but they are parts of knowledge not deserted by the labour of man. (5) For metaphysic, we have assigned‘ unto it the inquiry of formal and final causes ; which assignation, as to the former of them, may seem to be nugatory and void, because of the received and inveterate opinion, that the inquisition of man is not competent to find out essential forms or true differences ; of which opinion we will take this hold, that the inven- tion of forms is of all other parts of knowledge the worthiest to be sought, if it be possible to be found. As for the possi- bility, they are ill discoverers that think there is no land, when they can see nothing but sea. But it is manifest that Plato, in his opinion of ideas, as one that had a wit of elevation situate as upon a cliff, did descry that forms were the true object of knowledge ; but lost the real fruit of his opinion, by considering of forms as absolutely abstracted from matter, and not confined and determined by matter; and so turning his opinion upon theology, wherewith all his natural philosophy is infected. But if any man shall keep a continual watchful and severe eye upon action, operation, and the use of knowledge, he may advise and take notice what are the forms, the dis- closures whereof are fruitful and important to the state of man. For as to the forms of substances (man only except, of whom itis said, Formavit hominem de limo terre, et spiravit in faciem ejus spiraculum vite, and not as of all other creatures, Producant aque, producat terra), the forms of substances I say (as they arenow by compounding and transplanting multiplied) are so perplexed, as they are not to be inquired ; no more than it were either possible or to purpose to seek in gross the forms of those sounds which make words, which by composition and transposition of letters are infinite. But, on the other side, to inquire the form of those sounds or voices which make simple lettersis easily comprehensible ; and being known induceth and manifesteth the forms of all words, which consist and are THE SECOND BOOK. 89 compounded of them. In the same manner to inquire the form of a lion, of an oak, of gold; nay, of water, of air, is a vain pursuit ; but to inquire the forms of sense, of voluntary motion, of vegetation, of colours, of gravity and levity, of density, of tenuity, of heat, of cold, and all other natures and qualities, which, like an alphabet, are not many, and of which the essences (upheld by matter) of all creatures do consist ; to inquire, I say, the true forms of these, is that part of metaphysic which we now define of. Not but that physic doth make inquiry and take consideration of the same natures ; but how? Only as to the material and efficient causes of them, and not as to the forms. For example, if the cause of white- ness in snow or froth be inquired, and it be rendered thus, that the subtle intermixture of air and water is the cause, it is well rendered ; but, nevertheless, is this the form of whiteness? No; but it is the efficient, which is ever but vehiculum forme. This part of metaphysic I do not find laboured and performed ; whereat I marvel not ; because I hold it not possible to be in- vented by that course of invention which hath been used ; in regard that men (which is the root of all error) have made too untimely a departure, and too remote a recess from particulars. (6) But the use of this part of metaphysic, which I report as deficient, is of the rest the most excellent in two respects : the one, because it is the duty and virtue of all knowledge to abridge the infinity of individual experience, as much as the conception of truth will permit, and to remedy the complaint of vita brevis, ars longa ; which is performed by uniting the notions and conceptions of sciences. For knowledges are as pyramids, whereof history is the basis. So of natural philoso- phy, the basis is natural history ; the stage next the basis is physic ; the stage next the vertical point is metaphysic. As for the vertical point, opus quod operatur Deus a@ principio usque ad finem, the summary law of nature, we know not whether man’s inquiry can attain unto it. But these three be the true stages of knowledge, and are to them that are depraved no better than the giants’ hills :-— ‘Ter sunt conati imponere Pelio Ossam, Scilicet atque Ossz frondosim involvere Olympum.” But to those which refer all things to the glory of God, they are as the three acclamations, Sancte, sancte, sancte/ holy in the description or dilatation of His works; holy in the con- nection or concatenation of them; and holy in the union of them in a perpetual and uniform law. And, therefore, the speculation was excellent in Parmenides and Plato, although 90 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. but a speculation in them, that all things by scale did ascend to unity. So then always that knowledge is worthiest which is charged with least multiplicity, which appeareth to be meta- physic ; as that which considereth the simple forms or differ- ences of things, which are few in number, and the degrees and co-ordinations whereof make all this variety. The second. respect, which valueth and commendeth this part of meta- physic, is that it doth enfranchise the power of man unto the greatest liberty and possibility of works and effects. For physic carrieth men in narrow and restrained ways, subject to many accidents and impediments, imitating the ordinary flexuous courses of nature. But late undique sunt sapientibus vie ; to sapience (which was anciently defined to be rerum di- vinarum et humanarum scientia) there is ever a choice of means. For physical causes give light to new invention in simili materia. But whosoever knoweth any form, knoweth the utmost possibility of superinducing that nature upon any variety of matter ; and so is less restrained in operation, either to the basis of the matter, or the condition of the efficient; which kind of knowledge Solomon likewise, though in a more divine sense, elegantly describeth : non arctabuntur gressus twi, et currens non habebis offendiculum. The ways of sapience are not much liable either to particularity or chance. (7) The second part of metaphysic is the inquiry of final causes, which I am moved to report not as omitted, but as mis- placed. And yet if it were but a fault in order, I would not speak of it ; for order is matter of illustration, but pertaineth not to the substance of sciences. But this misplacing hath caused a deficience, or at least a great improficience in the sciences themselves. For the handling of final causes, mixed with the rest in physical inquiries, hath intercepted the severe and diligent inquiry of all real and physical causes, and given men the occasion to stay upon these satisfactory and specious causes, to the great arrest and prejudice of further discovery. For this I find done not only by Plato, who ever anchoreth upon that shore, but by Aristotle, Galen, and others which do usually likewise fall upon these flats of discoursing causes. For to say that ‘‘the hairs of the eyelids are for a quickset and fence about the sight ;” or that “‘ the firmness of the skins and hides of living creatures is to defend them from the extremities of heat or cold;” or that ‘‘the bones are for the columns or beams, whereupon the frames of the bodies of living creatures are built ;” or that “‘the leaves of trees are for protecting of the fruit ;” or that ‘‘ the clouds are for watering of the earth ;” or that ‘“‘the solidness of the earth is for the station and THE SECOND BOOK. 91 mansion of living creatures ;’’ and the like, is well inquired and collected in metaphysic, but in physic they are impertinent. Nay, they are, indeed, but remoras and hindrances to stay and slug the ship from further sailing ; and have brought this to pass, that the search of the physical causes hath been neglected and passed in silence. And, therefore, the natural philosophy of Democritus and some others, who did not suppose a mind or reason in the frame of things, but attributed the form there- of able to maintain itself to infinite essays or proofs of Nature, which they term fortune, seemeth to me (as far as I can judge by the recital and fragments which remain unto us) in par- ticularities of physical causes more real and better inquired than that of Aristotle and Plato; whereof both intermingled final causes, the one as a part of theology, and the other as a part of logic, which were the favourite studies respectively of both those persons; not because those final causes are not true and worthy to be inquired, being kept within their own province, but because their excursions into the limits of physical causes hath bred a vastness and solitude in that tract. For otherwise, keeping their precincts and borders, men are extremely deceived if they think there is an enmity or repug- nancy at all between them. For the cause rendered, that “the hairs about the eyelids are for the safeguard of the sight,” doth not impugn the cause rendered, that ‘‘ pilosity is incident to orifices of moisture—muscosi Fontes, &c.” Nor the cause rendered, that ‘‘the firmness of hides is for the armour of the body against extremities of heat or cold,” doth not impugn the cause rendered, that ‘contraction of pores is incident to the outwardest parts, in regard of their adjacence to foreign or unlike bodies ;” and so of the rest, both causes being true and compatible, the one declaring an intention, the other a consequence only, Neither doth this call in question or derogate from Divine Providence, but highly confirm and exalt it. For as in civil actions he is the greater and deeper politique that can make other men the instruments of his will and ends, and yet never acquaint them with his purpose, so as they shall do it and yet not know what they de, than he that imparteth his meaning to those he employeth ; so is the wisdom of God more admirable, when Nature intendeth one thing and Providence draweth forth another, than if He had communicated to particular creatures and motions the characters and im- pressions of His Providence. And thus much for metaphysic ; the latter part whereof I allow as extant, but wish it confined to his proper place. VIII. (1) Nevertheless, there remaineth yet another part of 92 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. natural philosophy, which is commonly made a principal part, and holdeth rank with physic special and metaphysic, which is mathematic; but I think it more agreeable to the nature of things, and to the light of order, to place it as a branch of metaphysic. For the subject of it being quantity, not quantity indefinite, which is but a relative, and belongeth to philosophia prima (as hath been said), but quantity determined or pro- portionable, it appeareth to be one of the essential forms of things, as that that is causative in Nature of a number of effects ; insomuch as we see in the schools both of Democritus and of Pythagoras that the one did ascribe figure to the first seeds of things, and the other did suppose numbers to be the principles and originals of things. And it is true also that of all other forms (as we understand forms) it is the most abstracted and separable from matter, and therefore most proper to metaphysic ; which hath likewise been the cause why it hath been better laboured and inquired than any of the other forms, which are more immersed in matter. For it being the nature of the mind of man (to the extreme prejudice of knowledge) to delight in the spacious liberty of generalities, as in a champaign region, and not in the inclosures of particularity, the mathematics of all other knowledge were the goodliest fields to satisfy that appetite. But for the placing of this science, it is not much material : only we have endeavoured in these our partitions to observe a kind of perspective, that one part may cast light upon another. (2) The mathematics are either pure or mixed. To the pure mathematics are those sciences belonging which handle quantity determinate, merely severed from any axioms of natural philosophy; and these are two, geometry and arith- metic, the one handling quantity continued, and the other dissevered. Mixed hath for subject some axioms or parts of natural philosophy, and considereth quantity determined, as it is auxiliary and incident unto them. For many parts of Nature can neither be invented with sufficient subtlety, nor demonstrated with sufficient perspicuity, nor accommodated unto use with sufficient dexterity, without the aid and inter- vening of the mathematics, of which sort are perspective, music, astronomy, cosmography, architecture, engineery, and divers others. In the mathematics I can report no deficience, except it be that men do not sufficiently understand the excellent use of the pure mathematics, in that they do remedy and cur¢ many defects in the wit and faculties intellectual. For if the wit betoo dull, they sharpen it; if too wandering, they fix it; if too inherent in the sense, they abstract it. So THE SECOND BOOK. 93 that as tennis is a game of no use in itself, but of great use in respect it maketh a quick eye and a body ready to put itself into all postures, so in the mathematics that use which is collateral and intervenient is no less worthy than that which is principal and intended. And as for the mixed mathematics, I may only make this prediction, that there cannot fail to be more kinds of them as Nature grows further disclosed. Thus much of natural science, or the part of Nature speculative. (3) For natural prudence, or the part operative of natural philosophy, we will divide it into three parts—experimental, philosophical, and magical ; which three parts active have a correspondence and analogy with the three parts speculative, natural history, physic, and metaphysic. For many operations have been invented, sometimes by a casual incidence and occurrence, sometimes by a purposed experiment ; and of those which have been found by an intentional experiment, some have been found out by varying or extending the same experi- ment, some by transferring and compounding divers experi- ments the one into the other, which kind of invention an empiric may manage. Again, by the knowledge of physical causes there cannot fail to follow many indications and designa- tions of new particulars, if men in their speculation will keep one eye upor use and practice. But these are but coastings along the shore, premendo littus iniquum ; for it seemeth to me there can hardly be discovered any radical or fundamental alterations and innovations in Nature, either by the fortune and essays of experiments, or by the light and direction of physical causes. If, therefore, we have reported metaphysic deficient, it must follow that we do the like of natural magic, which hath relation thereunto. For as for the natural magic whereof now there is mention in books, containing certain credulous and superstitious conceits and observations of sympathies and antipathies, and hidden proprieties, and some frivolous experi- ments, strange rather by disguisement than in themselves, it is as far differing in truth of Nature from such a knowledge as we require as the story of King Arthur of Britain, or Hugh of Bourdeaux, differs from Czsar’s Commentaries in truth of story ; for it is manifest that Cesar did greater things de vero than those imaginary heroes were feigned to do. But he did them not in that fabulous manner. Of this kind of learning the fable of Ixion was a figure, who designed to enjoy Juno, the goddess of power, and instead of her had copulation with a cloud, of which mixture were begotten centaurs and chimeras. So whosoever shall entertain high and vaporous imaginations, instead of a laborious and sober inquiry of truth, shall beget 94 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. hopes and beliefs of strange and impossible shapes. And, therefore, we may note in these sciences which hold so much of imagination and belief, as this degenerate natural magic, alchemy, astrology, and the like, that in their propositions the description of the means is ever more monstrous than the pretence or end. For it is a thing more probable that he that knoweth well the natures of weight, of colour, of pliant and fragile in respect of the hammer, of volatile and fixed in respect of the fire, and the rest, may superinduce upon some metal the nature and form of gold by such mechanic as longeth to the production of the natures afore rehearsed, than that some grains of the medicine projected should in a few moments of time turn a sea of quicksilver or other material into gold. So it is more probable that he that knoweth the nature of arefaction, the nature of assimilation of nourishment to the thing nourished, the manner of increase and clearing of spirits, the manner of the depredations which spirits make upon the humours and solid parts, shall by ambages of diets, bathings, anointings, medicines, motions, and the like, prolong life, or restore some degree of youth or vivacity, than that it can be done with the use of a few drops or scruples of a liquor or receipt. To conclude, therefore, the true natural magic, which is that great liberty and latitude of operation which dependeth upon the knowledge of forms, I may report deficient, as the relative thereof is. To which part, if we be serious and incline not to vanities and plausible discourse, besides the deriving and deducing the operations themselves from metaphysic, there are pertinent two points of much purpose, the one by way of preparation, the other by way of caution. The first is, that there be made a calendar, resembling an inventory of the estate of man, containing all the inventions (being the works or fruits of Nature or art) which are now extant, and whereof man is already possessed ; out of which doth naturally result a note what things are yet held impossible, or not invented, which calendar will be the more artificial and serviceable if to every reputed impossibility you add what thing is extant which cometh the nearest in degree to that impossibility ; to the end that by these optatives and potentials man’s inquiry may be the more awake in deducing direction of works from the speculation of causes. And secondly, that those experi- ments be not only esteemed which have an immediate and present use, but those principally which are of most universal consequence for invention of other experiments, and those which give most light to the invention of causes ; for the inven- tion of the mariner’s needle, which giveth the direction, is of THE SECOND BOOK. 95 no less benefit for navigation than the invention of the sails which give the motion. (4) Thus have I passed through natural philosophy and the deficiences thereof ; wherein if I have differed from the ancient and received doctrines, and thereby shall move contradiction, for my part, as I affect not to dissent, so I purpose not to con- tend. If it be truth, ‘Non canimus surdis, respondent omnia sylvz,’ the voice of Nature will consent, whether the voice of man do or no. And as Alexander Borgia was wont to say of the expedition of the French for Naples, that they came with chalk in their hands to mark up their lodgings, and not with weapons to fight ; so I like better that entry of truth which cometh peaceably with chalk to mark up those minds which are capable to lodge and harbour it, than that which cometh with pugnacity and contention. (5) But there remaineth a division of natural philosophy according to the report of the inquiry, and nothing concerning the matter or subject: and that is positive and considerative, when the inquiry reporteth either an assertion or a doubt, These doubts or non liquets are of two sorts, particular and total. For the first, we see a good example thereof in Aristotle’s Problems which deserved to have had a better con- tinuance ; but so nevertheless as there is one point whereof warning is to be given and taken. The registering of doubts ° hath two excellent uses: the one, that it saveth philosophy from errors and falsehoods; when that which is not fully appearing is not collected into assertion, whereby error might draw error, but reserved in doubt ; the other, that the entry of doubts are as so many suckers or sponges to draw use of knowledge ; insomuch as that which if doubts had not preceded, aman should never have advised, but passed it over without note, by the suggestion and solicitation of doubts is made to be attended and applied. But both these commodities do scarcely countervail and inconvenience, which will intrude itself if it be not debarred ; which is, that when a doubt is once received, men labour rather how to keep it a doubt still, than how to solve it, and accordingly bend their wits. Of this we see the familiar example in lawyers and scholars, both which, if they have once admitted a doubt, it goeth ever after authorised for adoubt. But that use of wit and knowledge is to be allowed, which laboureth to make doubtful things certain, and not those which labour to make certain things doubtful. There- fore these calendars of doubts I commend as excellent things; 96 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. go that there be this caution used, that when they be thoroughly sifted and brought to resolution, they be from thenceforth omitted, discarded, and not continued to cherish and encourage men in doubting. To which calendar of doubts or problems I advise be annexed another calendar, as much or more material, which is a calendar of popular errors: I mean chiefly in natural history, such as pass in speech and conceit, and are nevertheless apparently detected and convicted of untruth, that man’s knowledge be not weakened nor embased by such dross and vanity. As for the doubts or non liquets general or in total, I understand those differences of opinions touching the principles of nature, and the fundamental points of the same, which have caused the diversity of sects, schools, and philosophies, as that of Empedocles, Pythagoras, Democritus, Parmenides, and the rest. For although Aristotle, as though he had been of the race of the Ottomans, thought he could not reign except the first thing he did he killed all his brethren ; yet to those that seek truth and not magistrality, it cannot but seem a matter of great profit, to see before them the several opinions touching the foundations of nature. Not for any exact truth that can be expected in those theories ; for as the same phenomena in astronomy are satisfied by the received astronomy of the diurnal motion, aud the proper motions of the planets, with their eccentrics and epicycles, and likewise by the theory of Copernicus, who supposed the earth to move, and the calculations are indifferently agreeable ‘to both, so the ordinary face and view of experience is many times satisfied by several theories and philosophies; whereas to find the real truth requireth another manner of severity and attention. For as Aristotle saith, that children at the first will call every woman mother, but afterward they come to distinguish accord- ing to truth, so experience, if it be in childhood, will call every philosophy mother, but when it cometh to ripeness it will discern the true mother. So as in the meantime it is good to see the several glosses and opinions upon Nature, whereof it may be everyone in some one point hath seen clearer than his fellows, therefore I wish some collection to be made painfully and understandingly de antiquis philosophits, out of al! the possible light which remaineth to us of them: which kind of work I find deficient. But here I must give warning, that it be done distinctly and severedly ; the philo- sophies of everyone throughout by themselves, and not by titles packed and faggoted up together, as hath been done b Plutarch. For it is the harmony of a philosophy in itself, which giveth it light and credence; whereas if it be singled THE SECOND BOOK. 97 and broken, it will seem more foreign and dissonant. For as when I read in Tacitus the actions of Nero or Claudius, with circumstances of times, inducements, and occasions, I find them not so strange; but when I read them in Suetonius Tranquillus, gathered into titles and bundles and not in order of time, they seem more monstrous and incredible: so is it of any philosophy reported entire, and dismembered by articles. Neither do I exclude opinions of latter times to be likewise represented in this calendar of sects of philosophy, as that of Theophrastus Paracelsus, eloquently reduced into an harmony by the pen of Severinus the Dane; and that of Tilesius, and his scholar Donius, being as a pastoral philosophy, full of sense, but of no great depth; and that of Fracastorius, who, though he pretended not to make any new philosophy, yet did use the absoluteness of his own sense upon the old; and that of Gilbertus our countryman, who revived, with some altera- tions and demonstrations, the opinions of Xenophanes; and any other worthy to be admitted. (6) Thus have we now dealt with two of the three beams of man’s knowledge; that is radius directus, which is referred to nature, 7adius refractus, which is referred to God, and cannot report truly because of the inequality of the medium. There resteth radius reflecus, whereby man beholdeth and con- templateth himself. IX. (1) We come therefore now to that knowledge where- unto the ancient oracle directeth us, which is the knowledge of ourselves ; which deserveth the more accurate handling, by how much it toucheth us more nearly. This knowledge, as it is the end and term of natural philosophy in the intention of man, so notwithstanding it is but a portion of natural philoso- phy in the continent of Nature. And generally let this be a rule, that all partitions of knowledges be accepted rather for lines and veins than for sections and separations ; and that the continuance and entireness of knowledge be preserved. For the contrary hereof hath made particular sciences to become barren, shallow, and erroneous, while they have not been nourished and maintained from the common fountain. So we see Cicero, the orator, complained of Socrates and his school, that he was the first that separated philosophy and rhetoric ; whereupon rhetoric became an empty and verbal art. So we may sce that the opinion of Copernicus, touching the rotation of the earth, which astronomy itself cannot correct, because it is not repugnant to any of the phenomena, yet natural philoso- phy may correct. So we see also that the science of medicine if it be destituted and forsaken by natural philosophy, it is not p—8&4 98 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. much better than an empirical practice. With this reserva- tion, therefore, we proceed to human philosophy or humanity, which hath two parts: the one considereth man segregate or distributively, the other congregate or in society; so as human philosophy is either simple and particular, or conjugate and civil. Humanity particular consisteth of the same parts whereof man consisteth : that is, of knowledges which respect the body, and of knowledges that respect the mind. But before we distribute so far, it is good to constitute. For I do take the consideration in general, and at large, of human nature to be fit to be emancipate and made a knowledge by itself, not so much in regard of those delightful and elegant discourses which have been made of the dignity of man, of his miseries, of his state and life, and the like adjuncts of his common and undivided nature; but chiefly in regard of the knowledge concerning the sympathies and concordances be- tween the mind and body, which being mixed cannot be properly assigned to the sciences of either. (2) This knowledge hath two branches: for as all leagues and amities consist of mutual intelligence and mutual offices, so this league of mind and body hath these two parts : how the one discloseth the other, and how the one worketh upon the other; discovery and impression. The former of these hath begotten two arts, both of prediction or prenotion ; where- of the one is honoured with the inquiry of Aristotle, and the other of Hippocrates. And although they have of later time been used to be coupled with superstitious and fantastical arts, yet being purged and restored to their true state, they have both of them a solid ground in Nature, and a profitable use in life. The first is physiognomy, which discovereth the disposi- tion of the mind by the lineaments of the body. The second is the exposition of natural dreams, which discovereth the state of the body by the imaginations of the mind. In the former of these I note a deficience. For Aristotle hath very ingeniously and diligently handled the factures of the body, but not the gestures of the body, which are no less comprehen- sible by art, and of greater use and advantage. For the linea- ments of the body do disclose the disposition and inclination of the mind in general; but the motions of the countenance and parts do not only so, but do further disclose the present humour and state of the mind and will. For as your majesty saith most aptly and elegantly, ‘‘ As the tongue speaketh to the ear so the gesture speaketh to the eye.” And, therefore, a | number of subtle persons, whose eyes do dwell upon the faces and fashions of men, do well know the advantage of this | | THE SECOND BOOK. 99 observation, as being most part of their ability ; neither can it be denied, but that it is a great discovery of dissimulations, usiness. 2 B Q3 a) 9g oO & ct A gh ° 5 pede Bp = af bey g et =m @ = oI & & 2 B ‘| ia") RM 8 on @ ss ee 5 oO RQ g, = fe") 5 ~~ Bp Ru _— 5 > io) =) N ~~ ie) Rn | and melancholy passions, and pretendeth also to exhibit ‘Medicines to exhilarate the mind, to confirm the courage, to liations of the body, as things real, and not figurative. The Toot and life of all which prescripts is (besides the ceremony) the tality, or derogate from the sovereignty of the soul, he may be taught, in easy instances, that the infant in the mother’s womb telp. No more thana man can conclude, that because there be %estilent airs, able suddenly to kill a man in health, therefore 100 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. there should be sovereign airs, able suddenly to cure a man in sickness. Butthe inquisition of this partis of great use, though it needeth, as Socrates said, ‘‘a Delian diver,” being difficult and profound. But unto all this knowledge de communi vinculo, of the concordances between the mind and the body, that part of inquiry is most necessary which considereth of the seats and domiciles which the several faculties of the mind do take and occupate in the organs of the body ; which knowledge hath been attempted, and is controverted, and deserveth to be much better inquired. For the opinion of Plato, who placed the understanding in the brain, animosity (which he did unfitly call anger, having a greater mixture with pride) in the heart, and concupiscence or sensuality in the liver, deserveth not to be despised, but much less to be allowed. So, then, we have con- stituted (as in our own wish and advice) the inquiry touching human nature entire, as a just portion of knowledge to be handled apart. X. (1) The knowledge that concerneth man’s body is divided © as the good of man’s body is divided, unto which it referreth. The good of man’s body is of four kinds—health, beauty, strength, and pleasure: so the knowledges are medicine, or — art of cure; art of decoration, which is called cosmetic ; art of activity, which is called athletic; and art voluptuary, which Tacitus truly calleth eruditus luxus. This subject of man’s body is, of all other things in nature, most susceptible of remedy ; but then that remedy is most susceptible of error; for the | same subtlety of the subject doth cause large possibility and easy failing, and therefore the inquiry ought to be the more exact. (2) To speak, therefore, of medicine, and to resume that we have said, ascending a little higher: the ancient opinion that man was microcosmus—an abstract or model of the world—hath been fantastically strained by Paracelsus and the alchemists, as if there were to be found in man’s body certain correspondences and parallels, which should haverespect to all varieties of things, as stars, planets, minerals, which are extant in the great world. But thus much is evidently true, that of all substances which nature hath produced, man’s body is the most extremely com- pounded. For we see herbs and plants are nourished by earth and water; beasts for the most part by herbs and fruits; man by the flesh of beasts, birds, fishes, herbs, grains, fruits, water, and the manifold alterations, dressings, and preparations of these several bodies before they come to be his food and aliment. Add hereunto that beasts have a more simple order of life, and less change of affections to work upon their bodies, whereas THE SECOND BOOK. 101 man in his mansion, sleep, exercise, passions, hath infinite variations : and it cannot be denied but that the body of man of all other things is of the most compounded mass. The soul, on the other side, is the simplest of substances, as is well ex- pressed : ‘* Purumque reliquit Aithereum sensum atque aural simplicis ignem.” So that it is no marvel though the soul so placed enjoy no rest, if that principle be true, that Motus rerum est rapidus extra locum, placidus in loco. But to the purpose. This variable composition of man’s body hath made it as an instrument easy to distemper ; and, therefore, the poets did well to conjoin music and medicine in Apollo, because the office of medicine is but to tune this curious harp of man’s body and to reduce it toharmony. So, then, the subject being so variable hath made the art by consequent more conjectural; and the art being con- jectural hath made so much the more place to be left for im- posture. For almost all other arts and sciences are judged by acts or masterpieces, as I may term them, and not by the suc- cesses and events. The lawyer is judged by the virtue of his pleading, and not by the issue cf the cause; the master in the ship is judged by the directing his course aright, and not by the fortune of the voyage ; but the physician, and perhaps the poli- tique, hath no particular acts demonstrative of his ability, but is judged most by the event, which is ever but as it is taken: for who can tell, if a patient die or recover, or if a state be pre- served or ruined, whether it be art or accident? And therefore many times the impostor is prized, and the man of virtue taxed. Nay, we see [the] weakness and credulity of men is such, as they will often prefer a mountebank or witch before a learned physician. And therefore the poets were clear-sighted in dis- cerning this extreme folly when they made Aisculapius and Circe, brother and sister, both children of the sun, as in the verses— ‘“Tpse repertorem medicine talis et artis Fulmine Pheebigenam Stygias detrusit ad undas.” And again-— “* Dives inaccessos ubi Solis filia lucos,” &c. ¥or in all times, in the opinion of the multitude, witches and old women and impostors, have had a competition with physi- cians. And whatfolloweth? Even this, that physicians say to themselves, as Solomon expresseth it upon a higher occasion, 102 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. ‘Tf it befall to meas befalleth to the fools, why should I labour to be more wise?” And thereforeI cannot much blame physi- cians that they use commonly to intend some other art or practice, which they fancy more than their profession ; for you shall have of them antiquaries, poets, humanists, statesmen, merchants, divines, and in every of these better seen than in their profession ; and no doubt upon this ground that they find that mediocrity and excellency in their art maketh no difference in profit or reputation towards their fortune: for the weakness of patients, and sweetness of life, and nature of hope, maketh men depend upon physicians with all their defects. But, never- theless, these things which we have spoken of are courses be- gotten between a little occasion and a great deal of sloth and default ; for if we will excite and awake our observation, we shall see in familiar instances what a predominant faculty the subtlety of spirit hath over the variety of matter or form. Nothing more variable than faces and countenances, yet men can bear in memory the infinite distinctions of them ; nay, a painter, with a few shells of colours, and the benefit of his eye, and habit of his imagination, can imitate them all that ever have been, are, or may be, if they were brought before him. Nothing more variable than voices, yet men can likewise dis- cern them personally : nay, you shall have a buffon or panto- minvus will express as many as he pleaseth. Nothing more variable than the differing sounds of words; yet men have found the way to reduce them to a few simple letters. So that it is not the insufficiency or incapacity of man’s mind, but it is the remote standing or placing thereof that breedeth these mazes and incomprehensions ; for as the sense afar off is full of mistaking, but is exact at hand, so is it of the understanding, the remedy whereof is, not to quicken or strengthen the organ, but to go nearer to the object ; and therefore there is no doubt but if the physicians will learn and use the true approaches and ayenues of nature, they may assume as much as the poet saith ; ‘Et quoniam variant morbi, variabimus artes ; Mille mali species, mille salutis erunt.” Which that they should do, the nobleness of their art doth deserve: well shadowed by the poets, in that they made Aisculapius to be the son of [the] sun, the one being the fountain of life, the other as the second stream; but infinitely more honoured by the example of our Saviour, who made the body of man the object of His miracles, as the soul was the object of His doctrine. For we read not that ever He vouch- THE SECOND BOOK. 103 safed to do any miracle about honour or money (except that one for giving tribute to Czsar), but only about the preserving, sustaining, and healing the body of man. (3) Medicine is a science which hath been (as we have said) more professed than laboured, and yet more laboured than advanced ; the labour having been, in my judgment, rather in circle than in progression. For I find much iteration, but small addition. It considereth causes of diseases, with the occasions or impulsions; the diseases themselves, with the accidents ; and the cures, with the preservations. The de- ficiences which I think good to note, being a few of many, and those such as are of a more open and manifest nature, I will enumerate and not place. (4) The first is the discontinuance of the ancient and serious diligence of Hippocrates, which used to set down a narrative of the special cases of his patients, and how they proceeded, and how they were judged by recovery or death. Therefore having an example proper in the father of the art, I shall not need to allege an example foreign, of the wisdom of the law- yers, who are careful to report new cases and decisions, for the direction of future judgments. This continuance of medicinal history I find deficient ; which I understand neither to be so infinite as to extend to every common case, nor so reserved as to admit none but wonders: for many things are new in the manner, which are not new in the kind ; and if men will intend to observe, they shall find much worthy to observe. (5) In the inquiry which is made by anatomy, I find much deficience : for they inquire of the parts, and their substances, figures, and collocations; but they inquire not of the diversities of the parts, the secrecies of the passages, and the seats or nestling of the humours, nor much of the footsteps and im- pressions of diseases. The reason of which omission I suppose to be, because the first inquiry may be satisfied in the view of one or a few anatomies ; but the latter, being comparative and casual, must arise from the view of many. And as to the diversity of parts, there is no doubt but the facture or framing of the inward parts is as full of difference as the outward, and in that is the cause continent of many diseases; which not being observed, they quarrel many times with the humours, which are not in fault; the fault being in the very frame and mechanic of the part, which cannot be removed by medicine alterative, but must be accommodated and palliated by diets and medicines familiar. And for the passages and pores, it is true which was anciently noted, that the more subtle of them 164. THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. * appear not in anatomies, because they are shut and latent in dead bodies, though they be open and manifest in life : which being supposed, though the inhumanity of anatomia vivorum was by Celsus justly reproved ; yet in regard of the great use of this observation, the inquiry needed not by him so slightly to have been relinquished altogether, or referred to the casual practices of surgery ; but might have been well diverted upon the dissection of beasts alive, which notwithstanding the dis- similitude of their parts may sufficiently satisfy this inquiry. And for the humours, they are commonly passed over in anatomies as purgaments; whereas it is most necessary to observe, what cavities, nests, and receptacles the humours do find in the parts, with the differing kind of the humour so lodged and received. And as for the footsteps of diseases, and their devastations of the inward parts, impostumations, exul- cerations, discontinuations, putrefactions, consumptions, con- tractions, extensions, convulsions, dislocations, obstructions, repletions, together with all preternatural substances, as stones, carnosities, excrescences, worms, and the like; they ought to have been exactly observed by multitude of anatomies, and the contribution of men’s several experiences, and carefully set down both historically according to the appearances, and artificially with a reference to the diseases and symptoms which resulted from them, in case where the anatomy is of a defunct patient ; whereas now upon opening of bodies they are passed over slightly and in silence. (6) In the inquiry of diseases, they do abandon the cures of many, some as in their nature incurable, and others as past the period of cure; so that Sylla and the Triumvirs never proscribed so many men to die, as they do by their ignorant edicts : whereof numbers do escape with less difficulty than they did in the Roman proscriptions. Therefore I will not doubt to note as a deficience, that they inquire not the perfect cures of many diseases, or extremities of diseases ; but pro- nouncing them incurable do enact a law of neglect, and exempt ignorance from discredit. (7) Nay further, I esteem it the office of a physician not only to restore health, but to mitigate pain and dolors; and not only when such mitigation may conduce to recovery, but when it may serve to make a fair and easy passage. For it is no small felicity which Augustus Cesar was wont to wish to himself, that same Huthanasia ; and which was specially noted in the death of Antoninus Pius, whose death was after the fashion and semblance of a kindly and pleasant sleep. So it is written of Epicurus, that after his disease was judged desperate, THE SECOND BOOK. 105 he drowned his stomach and senses with a large draught and ingurgitation of wine ; whereupon the epigram was made, Hine Stygias ebrius hausit aquas ; he was not sober enough to taste any bitterness of the Stygian water. But the physicians contrariwise do make a kind of scruple and religion to stay with the patient after the disease is deplored ; whereas in my judgment they ought both to inquire the skill, and to give the attendances, for the facilitating and assuaging of the pains and agonies of death. (8) In the consideration of the cures of diseases, I find a deficience in the receipts of propriety, respecting the particular cures of diseases: for the physicians have frustrated the fruit of tradition and experience by their magistralities, in adding and taking out and changing quid pro quo in their receipts, at their pleasures; commanding so over the medicine, as the medicine cannot command over the disease. For except it be treacle and mithridatum, and of late diascordium, and a few more, they tie themselves to no receipts severely and reli- giously. For as to the confections of sale which are in the shops, they are for readiness and not for propriety. For they are upon general intentions of purging, opening, comforting, altering, and not much appropriate to particular diseases. And this is the cause why empirics and old women are more happy many times in their cures than learned physicians, because they are more religious in holding their medicines. Therefore here is the deficience which I find, that physicians have not, partly out of their own practice, partly out of the constant probations reported in books, and partly out of the traditions of empirics, set down and delivered over certain experimental medicines for the cure of particular diseases, besides their own conjectural and magistral descriptions. For as they were the men of the best composition in the state of Rome, which either being consuls inclined to the people, or being tribunes inclined to the senate; so in the matter we now handle, they be the best physicians, which being learned incline to the traditions of experience, or being empirics incline to the methods of learning. (9) In preparation of medicines I do find strange, specially considering how mineral medicines have been extolled, and that they are safer for tne outward than inward parts, that no man hath sought to make an imitation by art of natural baths and medicinable fountains: which nevertheless are confessed to receive their virtues from minerals; and not so only, but discerned and distinguished from what particular mineral they receive tincture, as sulphur, vitriol, steel, or the like : which eel: 106 THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING. nature, if it may be reduced to compositions of art, both the variety of them will be increased, and the temper of them will be more commanded. (10) But lest I grow to be more particular than is agreeable either to my intention or to proportion, I will conclude this part with the note of one deficience more, which seemeth to me of greatest consequence : which is, that the prescripts in use are too compendious to attain their end; for, to my under- standing, it is a vain and flattering opinion to think any medicine can be so sovereign or so happy, as that the receipt or use of it can work any great effect upon the body of man. It were a strange speech which spoken, or spoken oft, should reclaim a man from a vice to which he were by nature subject. It is order, pursuit, sequence, and interchange of application, which is mighty in nature ; which although it require more exact knowledge in prescribing, and more precise obedience in observing, yet is recompensed with the magnitude of effects. And although a man would think, by the daily visitations of the physicians, that there were a pursuance in the cure, yet let a man look into their prescripts and ministrations, and he shall find them but inconstancies and every day’s devices, without any settled providence or project. Not that every scrupulous or superstitious prescript is effectual, no more than every straight way is the way to heaven ; but the truth of the direction must precede severity of observance. (11) For cosmetic, it hath parts civil, and parts effeminate : for cleanness of body was ever esteemed to proceed from a due reverence to God, to society, and to ourselves. As for artificial decoration, it is well worthy of the deficiences which it hath ; being neither fine enough to deceive, nor handsome to use, nor wholesome to please. (12) For athletic, I take the subject of it largely, that is to say, for any point of ability whereunto the body of man may be brought, whether it be of activity, or of patience ; whereof activity hath two parts, strength and swiftness ; and patience likewise hath two parts, hardness against wants and extremi- ties, and endurance of pain or torment; whereof we see the practices in tumblers, in savages, and in those that suffer punishment. Nay, if there be any other faculty which falls not within any of the former