T d CENTRE for REFORMATION and RENAISSANCE STUDIES VICTORIA . VE RSITY The John Rylands Facsimiles No. 3 "A litil boke for the Pestilence" Bernard Quaritch II Grafton Street New Bond Street, London, W. Sherratt and Hughes Publishers to the Victoria University of Manchester 34 Cross Street, Manchester, and Soho Square, London, W. A litil boke the whiche traytied and reherced many gode thinges necessaries for the... Pestilence... made by the... Bisshop of Arusiens ... [London], [I485 ? ] Reproduced in facsimile from the copy in the John Rylands Library. With an Introduction by Guthrie Vine, M.A. Manchester : At the University Press London: Bernard Quaritch, and Sherratt and Hughes MCMX Letterpress and Plates primed at the University Press Oxford by Horace Hart vi PREFATORY NOTE of facsimile reproductions of some of the more interesting and remarkable of the rarer books and prints of which they are the guardians, The volumes will consist of minutely accurate facsimiles of the works selected, preceded by short bibliographical introductions. It is proposed to limit the issue of each work to five hundred copies. Of this number two hundred will be reserved for distribution to the principal libraries of the world ; the remainder will be offered for sale at a price calculated to cover the cost of reproduction. The introduction to the present volume has been written by the sub-librarian, Mr. Guthrie Vine, to whom the thanks of the Governors of the library and of the writer of this note are due. We are also indebted to the Controller of the Oxford University Press for the interest and care which he has bestowed upon the production of the work. HENRY GUPPY The John Rylands Library CONTENTS PREFATORY NOTE INTRODUCTION : Social Effects of Epidemics The Plague in Mediaeval Europe The Sweating Sickness The first London Printer. Lettou and Machlinla Machlinia's Press The Original of this Facsimile . Sweden in the Fifteenth Century The Author of this Treatise History of the Treatise FACSIMILE. PAGE V iX X xii xvi xvlii XX xxvii xxviii xxxii INTRODUCTION. TH influence of epidemic disease in the development SOCIAL of society is a matter replete with interest, EFFECTS OF whether the subject be viewed from the EPIDEMICS standpoint of history, or of medicine. The mysterious visitation that swept away the Assyrian host beneath the walls of Jerusalem, the disastrous plague that sapped the vitality of Athens in the maturity of her great- heSS, are but conspicuous examples of forces always operative in history. Great and widespread calamities, by their utter dis- regard of social conditions, must ever effect profound modifications in the form, and structure, of society. The Black Death may be considered at least as important a factor in producing the economic changes that marked the dose of the fourteenth century in England as the long and exhausting war with France. Yet the Black Death was merely one of many epidemics similar in character, if lesser in degree. If such epidemics were liable on their first approach to be regarded as special manifestations of the divine dis- pleasure, against which it were hopeless to contend, it can awaken no surprise. That on their recurrence from time to time men sho61d endeavour to cope with their enemy with such means as lay at their disposal resulted naturally b x A LITTLE BOOK OF THE PESTILENCE enough from their growing familiarity with the style, and manner, of attack. The treatise here reproduced furnishes an account of the various remedies, and curative methods, adopted in the middle ages for checking the advance of the terrible foe. The mere recital of the more serious attacks to which Europe was subjected from the time of the Black Death to that of the compilation of the present treatise, a period of a little over a century, is sufficient to give one some idea of the devastation that must have been wrought in Europe by this dreadful scourge. The Black Death is said to have originated in the Far East, and thence to have swept across Asia THE PLAGUE IN without a check. It made its appearance SV.r)IAvAL in Sicily in 346, and in the following year EUROPE broke out in Constantinople, Greece, and Italy. Thence it travelled across the Continent until it reached England in 348, where it lasted for several years, being conveyed from this country in x349 to Norway and the other Scandinavian states. In x 36 , and again in x368, we find numbers dying from the disease both in France and England. In x37 o countless victims are said to have perished from the plague in Ireland, which country again suffered severely from its ravages in i383. The year 375 witnessed an outbreak of a serious character in England, although not comparable to that of  39o-9 , which was likened for its mortality to the Black Death of forty years before. INTRODUCTION xi The fifteenth century enjoyed no more immunity from attacks of the plague than did the previous one. All parts of Europe suffered intermittently from it. In Eng- land it broke out between i4o 5 and t4o7, carrying off in London, it is said, 3o,oo people in the latter year. The next grave attack in England appears to have occurred about 142o. In a petition from the Marches of 1421 we hear of "great numbers of persons dead by the great mortalities and pestilences which have raged for three years past and still reign ". Turning to the Continent one finds that 8o, cx3o persons are stated to have died in 1427 in Dantzig and the neighbouring country. In 1438-39 the plague was still very rife in Germany, its prevalence in Basel being attested by Aeneas Sylvius, afterwards Pope Pius II. England, too, was not exempt from the disease in these years, for between 143o and t44o four outbreaks are recorded in London, the last one extending to the whole kingdom. The next visitation of the plague, which began in 1448 , appears to have overrun practically the whole of Western Europe. It reached Sweden in i45o  and devastated that country for a period of five years, carrying off in I455 no fewer than 9,ocx3 persons in Stockholm alone. The autumn of i464 saw a recurrence of the disease in Sweden, which lasted with dire effects for about two years; the mortality in Stockholm on this occasion is said to have reached a total of 7,oo. The prevalence of the plague in Sweden at this period is of special interest in view of the fact that the treatise here reproduced in facsimile was written (as will appear later) INTRODUCTION xiii This statement is borne out by a manuscript in the British Museum (Additional MSS. 27582) written by Thomas Forestier, a doctor of medicine belonging to Normandy who was resident in London at the time. Soon afterwards he seems to have removed to Rouen, where, probably in I49 I, was published a Latin work by him on the plague, entitled: "Tractatvs contra pesti- lentiam thenasmonem et dissenteriam." In the latter work he names the I9th of September, x485, as the date of the commencement of the sweating sickness. Other authorities, whilst differing as to the day, agree in attri- buting its origin to the autumn of x485. After its first appearance the disease seems to have spread with terrible rapidity. In London Thomas Hyll the lord mayor, Sir William Stokker chosen as his suc- cessor, and several aldermen died within a few days--facts that enable us to form some idea of the extent of the mortality amongst the other classes of citizens. As the coronation of Henry VII took place with due ceremony on October 3% and Parliament met on the 7th of the following month, the departure of the disease would appear to have been as sudden as was its advent. The same suddenness that marked the general movements of the epidemic characterized the individual attacks. In the *Tractatvs contra pestilentiam, etc." Forestier says that ,c more than  5,000 persons departed this world by sudden death, as if from divine chastisement, and many died unshriven without respite, whilst walking in the streets ". Vhether Forestier is here speaking of the number of xiv A LITTLE BOOK OF THE PESTILENCE victims in London does not seem clear, but the suddenness of the attacks must have been not the least terrible feature of them. We have a vivid picture of this characteristic of the disease in the manuscript treatise of Forestier. "We saw" (he says) "two prestys standing togeder and speaking togeder, and we saw both of them dye sodenly. Also... we se the wyf of a taylour taken and sodenly dyed. Another yonge man walking by the street fell down sodenly. Also another gentylman ryding out of the cyte dyed." The terms in which he describes the symptoms correspond closely with other accounts: "And this sickness cometh with a grete swetyng and stynkyng, with rednesse of the face and of all the body, and a con- tynual thurst, with a grete here and hedache because of the fumes and venoms." It is no cause for wonder that to a superstitious age the outbreak of such a disease augured ill for the peace of Henry's reign. The disease soon made its way from London into the country. Definite notices of it are scanty, but we know that the abbot of Croyland succumbed to an attack on the  4th of October. Its prevalence at Oxford is well attested ; although it lasted but a few weeks its stay was long enough to exact a heavy toll among the scholars of the University. Though records of its presence are but few, the statements of historians as to the extent of its ravages may presumably be accepted without reservation. This disease that broke out in 485 was generally believed to differ in character from any of the epidemics that had preceded it; hence the assignment of a new name xvi A LITTLE BOOK OF THE PESTILENCE Seine, the very region where Henry's force had been raised, and lasted with but little intermission for a century and a half. It seems not unreasonable to suppose that the seeds of this later endemic disease may always have lain latent in this region, but for lack of entirely suitable conditions may for long have failed in their native soil to reach the point of germination. These conditions must have been supplied in England. Contact with people of a different stock, and other manners, may have been all that was requisite to enable the infection to burst forth. Strangers are naturally more susceptible to any malady than those who by long residence in an infected area have become gradually inured against a disease. A parallel is furnished by the yellow fever, from which negroes enjoy almost complete immunity, although they are believed to have been the means of introducing the virus to the white man. Even the exemption of Henry's force from attacks of the sweating sickness (supposing it granted, and history is silent on the point) would not seem, therefore, to justify us in refusing our assent to the theory that traces the infection to that source. Whilst the honour of printing the first English books, as well as that of introducing the art of THE FIRST LONDON typography into this country, belongs to an VRIT.R Englishman the distinction of establishing the first press within the actual boundary of the city of London is claimed by John Lettou, supposed to belong to Lithuania of which name Lettou is an old form. INTRODUCTION xvii An examination of the technique of Lettou's work shows that he was a practised printer. The fount of type used in his first books is practically identical with one employed at Rome in I478-79 by Johann Bulle of Bremen which according to the late Mr. Proctor, was the same as one in the hands of another printer in that city, Johann Schurener. It seems quite likely that Lettou may have been an assistant at one of these presses, and have brought away with him from that city a fount of type with which he was already familiar. Many of the early printers moved from one country to another, so that there would be nothing exceptional in Lettou migrating from Rome to London. What reasons brought Lettou to London we do not know, but here in I48O we find him printing three editions of an indulgence of John Kendale against the Turks (of which Caxton printed a corresponding number), besides the work of Antonius Andreas "QBestiones super duodecim libros metaphisice", and in the following year the "Expositiones super Psalterium" of Thomas Wallensis. A certain amount of rivalry no doubt existed between Caxton and Lettou, and in one particular, namely, the use of" signatures", the former seems to have copied Lettou. These are small letters (or figures) placed at the foot of the first leaves of a quire to aid the binder in the arrangement of the sheets. They are found in some of the earliest manu- scripts, and were at first added by hand to printed books but about I472 the custom of printing them was introduced. The two books printed by Lettou were produced at the INTRODUCTION xix A noticeable deterioration in the quality of workman- ship accompanied the change in the class of books issued by the press. For the neat fount used by Lettou was substituted a small cramped type, evidently designed for printing law books, as it contains numerous contractions, like the legal manuscripts of the time. After the publication of the five books mentioned above Lettou's name disappears ; whether through death, or through withdrawal from the business, is not known. The deterioration in the press work just alluded to suggests that on the accession of Machlinia he did not exercise the same active supervision over the press, and may have been preparing to retire from it altogether on his partner acquiring sufficient practice in the art of printing. On the other hand the consistent employment of signatures so long as Lettou remained in the firm--a typographical aid used very irregularly by Machlinia--shows that the former did not give up entire charge to his partner. The date when Machlinia acquired the sole control of the press appears to have been about t483, although owing to the entire absence of dates in his books one is unable to state positively when the change took place. The same fount of type, with some modifications, as that used by Lettou and Machlinia appears in one other book, "The siege of Rhodes," which is generally attri- buted to an unknown printer. This is an English version by John Kay, who describes himself as poet laureate, of a Latin work written by Gulielmus Caorsin, vice-chancdlor of the Knights of Malta. xx A LITTLE BOOK OF THE PESTILENCE Dibdin in the "Bibliotheca Spenceriana" adjudged the work, on account of the resembhnce of the type, to be the production of Lettou and MacMinia, or of Lettou alone ; but, as the book shows traces of less skilful workmanship than those with which Lettou's name is associated, and has no signatures, which that printer always used, one may assume that he had no hand in printing it. It is produced with more skill and care than Machlinia was wont to exhibit, so one seems unable to entertain the idea of his being the printer, whose identity appears likely to remain a moot point for the present. The book is dedicated by the translator to Edward IV, whose death took place in April, x483. As dedications were apt to be copied without alteration in printed books of that period, long after they were originally written, it would be rash to take for granted that this was the date of printing solely for that reason ; on the other hand, x483 does not seem an unlikely date for the issue of the book, as Machlinia had probably just started on his own account with fresh types, and may have parted with the discarded fount to some other printer who employed it for this book. The absence of definite dates in all of Machlinia's books MACHLINIA'S constitutes a serious difficulty in their PRESS arrangement, which no examination of the technique seems able to overcome, for he appears to use quite indiscriminately signatures, headlines, and directors" rathe name given to the small letters printed in the blank INTRODUCTION xxi spaces left for the insertion of rubricated or illuminated capitals, to serve as guides to the rubricator. The productions of his press can be divided, however, into two groups according to the type employed in them, known as the Fleet Bridge group, and the Iqolborn group. In two of the eight books belonging to the former group the printer gives his address as near "Flete brigge'; whilst in the colophon to one of the latter he describes himself as printing in Flolborn. For the books of the Fleet Bridge group, which was probably the earlier of the two, Machlinia used two new founts of type, of a square gothic character, described as types 2 and 3 by Mr. Proctor, his type I, which was used for headings and opening words of books, being the same as that similarly employed by Lettou. The two books referred to as containing colophons, both of which are in the John Rylands Library, are an edition of Littleton's "Tenores novelli" and the "Liber aggrega- tionis" of Albertus Magnus. The colophon of the former is as follows: " Expliciunt Tenores nouelli lmpressi per me wilhelm de machlinia in opulentissima Ciuitate Londonia iuxta ponte qu.i vulgariter dicitur Flete brigge." The colophon of the Albertus Magnus reads thus : "[ A1bertus Magnus de Secretis nature Explicit Necnon per me wilhelmum de Mechlinia Impressus In opulentissima Ciuitate Londoniar Iuxta pontem qui vulgariter dicitur Flete brigge." Perhaps the most interesting amongst the Fleet Bridge books from a bibliographical point of view is a small xxii A LITTLE BOOK OF THE PESTILENCE vellum edition of the "Horae ad usum Sarum ", the existence of which is known only from a few leaves recovered from various bindings and distributed in the British Museum, the libraries of Cambridge University, Corpus Christi College, Oxford, and Lincoln Minster. This book exhibits the only ornament used by Machlinia, in the shape of an engraved border, which we afterwards find in the hands of Richard Pynson. Another book that deserves a passing reference is "The revdation of St. Nicholas to a monk of Evesham ", as affording an example of Machlinia's somewhat casual methods of work. In the course of printing this book one of the sheets was wrongly imposed, but instead of re- printing the whole sheet correctly he merely printed off some copies .of the wrong pages and pasted them down in their proper order. One of the books in this group most commonly met with is an edition of the "Nova statuta", printed in law French. It covers the period from the first year of Edward III to the 22nd year of Edward IV inclusive. The latter year terminated on March 3, I48Z-3, and as Edward IV died in the following month this book can reasonably be assigned to his successor's reign. The removal of Machlinia to Holborn may probably be placed about the latter half of I484, assuming that the introduction of the new types (Nos. 4 and 5) synchronized with the change of address. The type styled by Proctor no. 4 bears a strong resemblance to one of Caxton's founts (no. 2") and is still more like that used by xxiv A LITTLE BOOK OF THE PESTILENCE Museum, Cambridge University Library, and the John Rylands Library respectively. The British Museum copy has a title-page, the earliest occurrence of one in any book printed in this country. The next example of a title- page is found in "The Chastysing of goddes Chyldern", printed by Wynkyn de Worde about 1491. The only other certain production of Machlinia's press with which any definite date can be connected is a Bull of Innocent VIII confirming the marriage of Henry VII with Elizabeth of York, and excommunicating all who should rebel against Henry VII, which was issued by the Pope on March 27, 486. There are two copies now extant, one of which is preserved in the John Rylands Library, and the other in the library of the Society of Antiquaries. The unique copy of the "Regule, etc.", of the Chancery of Pope Innocent VIII preserved in the John Rylands Library, that must have been printed after Sept. 23, ,484, has also been regarded as one of the books which assist in the arrangement of Machlinia's productions. But, in spite of its close resemblance, the fount employed is not the same as type 4 of Machlinia, having a lighter face, and containing, too, a superior m which Machlinia does not appear to have used. If it is not formed by trimming up type 4, it is probably a fount employed by Veldener, or Jean Brito, so that the work would have to be assigned to a Low Country press. One of the best known books in the Holborn group is the "Speculum Christiani" attributed to John Watton. It is a volume of theology, written partly in Latin, and partly xxx A LITTLE BOOK OF THE PESTILENCE by the terms of which the three kingdoms of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden were to be henceforward under the rule of a single sovereign. Causes for dissatisfaction with this arrangement were not long in making their appearance. A struggle arose as to the feudal rights of Denmark over the duchy of Schleswig, and this devdoped on the death of Margaret in '413 into a war which hsted twenty years. To meet the expenses of this war Eric levied heavy taxes on the Swedes, who in i434 took up arms under a miner, named Engdbrekt Engelbrektsson, and compdled the Swedish Council of State to proclaim the deposition of the king in ,436. By the influence of the nobility Eric regained his authority to a large extent, but he was obliged to appoint as viceroy in Sweden Karl Knutsson, one of the leaders of the national party. Eric was not destined, however, to enjoy his regal power much longer, for in I439 he was dethroned by the three countries, and was obliged to seek safety elsewhere. In his stead Denmark chose his nephew, Christopher of Bavaria, whose authority was soon recognized in the other two kingdoms. On his death in 14.48 Christian, count of Oldenburg, was chosen to fill the throne of Denmark, to which was added shortly that of Norway. The Swedish people were not so compliant as the sister state, and elected Karl Knutsson king, under the title of Karl VIII. With the nobility and clergy, at the head of whom was the Archbishop of Upsah, openly disaffected towards him, his position became at last untenable, and he was obliged in xxxii A LITTLE BOOK OF THE PESTILENCE summary of the events which happened during the life- time of our author it is impossible, in the absence of certain information, to reconstruct with any degree of probability the outline of his career. For our author's name and office we are indebted to THE AUTHOR the Latin editions of this treatise printed in OF THIS the fifteenth century. In these the work TREATISE is described thus, with variations: "Regi- men contra pestilentiam... Kaminti (or Kamiti), episcopi Arusiensis civitatis, regni Dacie, medicine expertissimi professoris." The form Kaminti, or Kamiti, has long been recognized as a mistake for Kannuti, or Kanuti ; but owing to the fact that ' Arusiensis civitatis" was wrongly identified with Aarhuus in Denmark instead of Arosia, the Latin form of Vtergs near Stockholm in Sweden, the author could not be traced, as no bishop of Aarhuus bore a name at all resembling his. The apparent geogra- phical difficulty connected with the expression "regni Dacie", i.e. kingdom of Denmark, exphins itself on reference to the history of the two countries of Sweden and Denmark, and, indeed, by narrowing the limits of,our search hdps us to fix with the more certainty on Bengt Knutsson (Benedict Kanuti), who was dected bishop in t46I, as the author of this work. Our author was a man of rank we learn from the Swedish chronicle of the bishops of Viisters, compiled by Peder Svart, a bishop of the see who died in ,. D. 1562. From the fact of his appointment to the bishopric of this xxxiv A LITTLE BOOK OF THE PESTILENCE There are grounds for bdieving that some such conflict between the civil and spiritual powers arose in the present instance. Bishop Svart's chronicle states that Knutsson was appointed bishop by the Council of the Kingdom in King Christian's absence"--which need by no means imply his ignorance--'and that he held the office two years." Official documents of Pope Pius II, however, show that immediatdy after the death of Olaf Gunnari in I46I the Pope appointed to the see Birger Mnsson, who generally figures as successor, in May I462, to Knutsson. As two letters are in existence, one of July 25, 1462, and another of 1463, in which Knutsson is spoken of as bishop of Viisters, it seems fairly certain that one is not justified in assuming the death of Knutsson to have necessarily taken place before May, 1462 , when Birger Mnsson is credited with being elected bishop, a date that may only mark the time when the Papal nomination was accepted by the chapter. Supposing Knutsson to have been a partisan of the Danish king, as suggested above, one can easily understand that the Swedish clergy in their growing state of alienation from Christian I would welcome the opportunity of removing from office one of his supporters. As to the time and place of Knutsson's death we are m ignorance. The same obscurity in which the earlier portion of his life is wrapt surrounds the closing scenes. The compilation of the work on the plague--the outcome of the experiences gained in his days of poverty--that was the source of all the treatises published on the subject for INTRODUCTION XXXV ,50 years, has alone preserved his name from entire oblivion. The disease that had devastated Sweden from ,45o to x455, and again in 464 and x465, had probably never entirely quitted the country in the interval between these visitations, and it was in anticipation of its breaking out with increased virulence that we may assume the author to have written his work about 461-63 . As the text is available in this reproduction, it is unnecessary to dwell upon the causes assigned by Knutsson for the spread of the pestilence, or on the remedies which he recommended. The various forms in which his work was circulated HISTORY need to be briefly described before termi- OF THE nating this notice of his treatise. Several T REATl SE Latin editions were printed in the fifteenth century, lacking for the most part any indication of printer, place, or date. On typographical grounds they are assigned to Antwerp, Paris, etc. None of them are likely to be much, if at all, earlier than the English version printed by Machlinia. A versified form of the work appears in an edition of "Albertus Magnus de Virtutibus herbarum", which was printed about  5oo. The history of the English version is of greater interest. One of the Sloane manuscripts in the British Museum is said to agree so closely in wording and spelling that it may actually have been the original from which the text was set up by Machlinia. This is the manuscript described as no. 276. in Ayscough's Catalogue, and no. 404 FACSIMILE