* Satie = Sh < < ee ) Ee: oN ee * * - . - . . OR o 49.9 +9, 9. A ah oy hy "4 GoprightNO_ COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT: i. _ C3 r Ree — = ; ERICAN Pee tires ae | 1 a Prvtoouns SAiJaMTRY Worse: fy, Mae Aalthon OF Bivctes ju" woe Poprarys wte Porevie:: Agtormor Upayrlt : heertta, Pavetl Serv ii 1 ith yis; . Retiurs Tele inter wat, AD eee ae nhs flee 1OT) ~ ’ Yi : ts Dees? Gor FET CO . ' st mes |e ee i | ind iy . Pa : yo || Pi . q | = » a AMERICAN FOREST REGULATION BY THEODORE SALISBURY WOOLSEY, Jr., M.F. Author of Studies in French Forestry, etc. Consulting Forester; Assistant District Forester, Forest Service 1908-1915; Lecturer Yale School of Forestry, 1912, 1916-1917 THE TUTTLE, MOREHOUSE AND TAYLOR COMPANY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT a/ 9a Copyright r922 Part I and appendix, Theodore S. Woolsey, Jr. Part II, Herman H, Chapman MAY |2 1922 Oc A674209 VLD 1 /. TO JAMES W. TOUMEY IN RECOGNITION OF HIS SERVICES AS A TEACHER OF FORESTRY IN THE YALE SCHOOL OF FORESTRY PREFACE “American Forest Regulation” is intended primarily as a textbook on the theory and application of regulating the cut. It may also serve as a guide to forest administrators who must solve broad regulation problems at a reasonable cost. Emphasis has been placed on the discrimination and choice of material, rather than the collection and elaboration of a multitude of methods—many totally unsuited to American conditions. Forest manage- ment in the United States cannot be successful until it is definitely recognized that the cutting on all forests held for permanent production must be con- trolled by working plans based on sound silviculture, local economic require- ments and rate of yield. Not the least perplexing of the problems encountered has been the question of terminology. The author, a member of the Committee of the Society of American Foresters, which recommended standard terms* and definitions, has followed the Committee’s report, except where it departs from well established common usage. “Working circle” has accordingly been substi- tuted for “working unit.” The student who is assigned additional reading or study in the works of other authors, cannot help but be confused by a varying use of terms. For example, “working group” may be termed “work- ing section” by one author, “working figure” by another, and “working circle” by a third. The “working unit’ of the S. A. F. again may be described as “working circle” by Sir William Schlich**, thus further perplexing the student. The writer felt that no personal preference for terms should enter into this new book on American Forest Regulation but that “working circle,” widely used in the United States, was preferable to “working unit.” On the other hand, the new term “management plan,” largely used by the Forest Service in place of the term “working plan” (adopted for generations by English speaking foresters), has not been adopted. To simplify study, the regulation of cut methods in Part I have been treated systematically, as follows: (1) Definition, (2) Discussion, (3) Illustration, (4) Class room questions or quiz. This plan has not been rigidly adhered to, yet so far as the subject matter lends itself to this form of treatment, it is used throughout. Formulae have first been stated in English (instead of in “formulae equivalents’) because the writer found they were more readily grasped by the student. A special feature is quite complete foot-note refer- ences to American Literature on each subject. A rather theoretical discussion of soil-rent (after Endres) has been given, notwithstanding the fact that it is likely that a large proportion of the best American forests will eventually be owned or controlled by the public, and consequently need not necessarily be managed strictly on the basis of the * Published 1917 in the Journal of Forestry, Vol. XV, No. 1. **Schlich, Sir William, Manual of Forestry (Forest Management, Vol. 3, p. 273). vi American Forest Regulation | highest soil-rent. Yet this financial side may eventually be of weight in | planning the management of many private American forests, where business reasons may usually be foremost. Because of this considerable space in the appendix has been given to a frankly Germanized explanation of soil-rent, and to Endres’ discussion and illustration of its application. The contrast between French and German text-book methods is evident even to the casual reader. The German is apt to treat the subject exhaus- tively; he will describe twenty different formulae, each varying from the other ever so little, while the French writer will perhaps narrow the formulae down to three fundamental and radically different methods, and omit the others. This book (with the exception of soil-rent) has been written from the French rather than from the German viewpoint, and, consequently, may err in its simplicity rather than in the complexity of subject matter. Commenting on this very feature of German thoroughness and complexity, Sir William Schilieh states :* “Of the seventeen methods described several have only an academic interest, if so much, and all of the others have for their object to secure a sustained yield by gradually producing such a proportion between the different age classes that each shall, as nearly as possible, occupy about the same area, whether they are found on different areas or scattered over the whole forest . . . . there is not nearly so much difference in the several methods as their inventors believe.” This viewpoint explains why the author of this volume has omitted the usual elaboration of textbook methods and formulae which differ from each other in some minor degree. Rather than include data on American working plans which are untried and preliminary in character, the writer has omitted the usual treatment of this phase of organization. In Appendix A—E some “working plan” data have necessarily been included so as not to mar a complete translation of a portion of Martin’s Forsteinrichtung. Acknowledgment has been made in the foot-notes for material borrowed directly from other sources, but necessarily many of the ideas and much of the data included, have been absorbed and adapted from text-books on the same subject, especially from Volume III (Fourth edition) Manual of Forestry by Sir William Schlich; from Lehrbuch Waldwertrechung and Forststatik by Max Endres; and from Volume III, Economie Forestiére by G. Huffel. The description of regulation in the various German states and in Austria given in the appendix is translated from Martin’s Forsteinrichtung. Acknowl- edgment is also due C. E. Carter (of Australia), Yale School of Forestry, 1922, T. S. Hansen, Yale School of Forestry, 1917, T.. Tl. Munger Uo se E, J. Hanzlik, U.S. F. S., E. Koch,/U.S. FS. and M. HL Wolit Us seas for a review of and a critical comment on the manuscript of Part I. When the original plan of February 1, 1917 of publishing under joint author- ship with Professor Chapman had to be abandoned, the following acknowl- edgment was agreed upon: 7 “This manuscript was (largely) written in 1917, with the consent and codperation of H. H. Chapman. The technical order and arrangement followed the Yale lecture notes * Sir William Schlich (Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 1913, p. 201). Preface vii of Prof. Chapman, but the American and European details and references and scheme of treatment, are original with the writer. The manuscript was revised and completed by the writer in 1920 (1921). While Prof. Chapman assumes no responsibility, what- soever, as to technical details, the writer wishes to acknowledge his very great indebted- ness to him for the use of his notes as a guide. Those who took his lectures at Yale will recognize just how great this indebtedness is.” In 1920 Prof. Chapman kindly agreed to contribute Part II on “Correlation of Regulation and Growth in Extensive American Forests,” with the under- standing that the book would be immediately published under my authorship. The slight duplication of Part I in Part II is an advantage rather than a detriment and Chapman’s comment on the correlation of growth and regula- tion is invaluable. When chief of silviculture in the Forest Service, District No. 3, the need for regulating the cut of timber on National Forests was very apparent. After giving the courses in management at the Yale School of Forestry, 1916- 17 (when Professor Chapman took my place in the West) I was convinced that regulation had been misunderstood and neglected in the United States and that, therefore, there was an immediate need of a thoroughly Americanized edition on this essential and important phase of forest management. The opportunity of service with the A. E. F. in France explains the four years delay in publication, but I am certain that the need for such a book to-day is all the more acute. THEODORE S. WOOLSEY, JR. New Haven, Conn. December, 1921. SOM COP FON OR a ae is PART I POLICY AND THEORY OF REGULATION CHAPS R INTRODUCTION TO FOREST REGULATION Page Definition and Significance of Forest Regulation .............eeee eee cere eee eens I Conception of Regulation in Europe ........-. 60. eee e cece eee eee eee enn eneees 3 Scope of Regulation: ses sss se cic ses Kemielss ec ein so soe n+ = +o ainineieiaiialinue on Sager 4 Land Classification, an Initial Step ........... see e eee eee eee e tenet ees 4 Details Must be Systematized in Working Plans ................- ee eee eee ceeeeee 5 Progress of American Regulation in Early Working Plans .................+++-: 5 Stock Taking by the Forest Service Preliminary to Regulation .................. 6 Regulation on Privately Owned Property ............2..00-00-- sees escennanes 7 QHGTSo Gisva wed lass Doses wag RDA = Slalgie 16: Ws aunhse.s vey shel otels MUN RUA acacolo Mines fa Crk) < oicn 5 7 CHAPTER II BACKGROUND OF A REGULATION POLICY AND SUSTAINED YIELD Basic Conditions that Show Need for the Conservation and Regulation of Forests 9 TBAGICL SEWICICS Mets ce oet: coerce s gic is: Wice MMR R roche ee ove ba schean a Gite aelsneketstcne) cede rc SeReie Te hee toe: aan 10 Gurtailment ot Production? ; :). coche ce te cisctniee sic eietoeecucinme Ge ae aaa eee 10 Continuous: Forest, broduction |. 2.:ectss cin as See oie crea ieee ier eter ee Il Barly Western. Land ‘Policy and! ltsixestilts «J Se.cc.sks ce we sic ssc oe eee = re II Effect of Economic Lumbering on Forest Management ..............0.eeceeceees 12 Possible Solutions; Restricted Private Control or Public Ownership? ............ 13 Bolicyjand Definitioniof Sustained. Wield® 4%. 2c).cc6 6: = + ys > seers ciel eee 14 Comparison with ‘Conditions;in Krance + /....0.22 3. penjesee am «sore ee 15 Finanetal Aspect of ay Sustained < bcc mace noe 38 CHAPTER V FINANCIAL ROTATIONS _ Definition of Financial Rotations and Related Subjects .......................+4- 39 (A) Rotations for Maximum Forest Rent or Highest Mean Annual Net Money TERE FAL tas aes eee eee RT ae cea ete cnche hea os sieges eeeemete (oes else al ose of ele ue/laia, ote tay ehoilelei si slaunce pie ous 40 MlistrationsvoteWlarctnatin MOreSt Nene, (. <.4-0y- crc nueva afore, <)0 els) «)nlelle, ol serie euoyel veut ore e 40 Distinction Between Forest Rent and Soil Rent with Illustrations ................. Al (B) Rotations for Maximum Soil Rent or Highest Returns per Dollar Invested .. 43 ei awuatiRaterotsinterest Should. Be Used ? 1 acZets. joe soles Qaprgleh dy-gime ser 44 eye seenatis innvence-or binal Yaeldirirs:,....s, .cieeeeies bell noe ogre As beeteub et 45 Illustrations of American Attempts at Calculating Meximom Soil Rent Rotations.. 46 Binal @hoice 2-1 ene - eee OL (2) Area Allotment by Periods as a Basis for Regulation .................eeese: oI Wse af Yield) Tables-in, ‘Computine “Voltmes’ 2... son... ..0 0+ + cule ate cle ere Q2 - (C) Area-Volume (and Age) Basis of Regulation—Value and Classification ..... 93 (1) Volume and Area-Volume (and Age) Allotment as a Basis for Regulation ... 93 Modern Allotment. Principles: v2.75 Adak t oe telcdc toes ecient oie cee oe 04 Regulation by (Americanized) Stand Selection (after Judeich) .................. 95 Illustrations of Stand Selection in Eastern and Western Forests ...............-. 05 Differences between Area-Volume Allotment and. Stand Method ................. 100 Use ‘of Age Classes im Regulation! Wa.o 006. dacs s new ns « betes enn calc fee ae ee IOI Regulation on Basis of Cutting Cycles and Felling Reserve ...........0..-eeeeeee IOI Oi) A a nn ee Ae ene OE eRe sprit i 103 PA:-RT LI CORRELATION OF REGULATION AND GROWTH IN EXTENSIVE AMERICAN FORESTS CHAPTER X THE CUTTING CYCLE AS A DETERMINING INFLUENCE IN AMERICAN FOREST REGULATION Page Attitude of Private Owners'c. sien o:cl vend cele Jae eee 105 Preliminary Requirements J. i. . («00 ss. 22. sete ee: ee 105 120. 130. 131. 132. 133. 134. 135. 136. 137. 138. 130. 140. I4I. 142. 143. 144. 145. 146. 147. 148. 140. 150. EST: 152. Contents xi Page Policy as Influenced by Character of Ownership .........-. 2:0 eee eee cece eee 107 Goal of (Public miata SeIeNE sign. cae hc e ee ceitie de sean ees ian ae ee eee por 108 Influences Determining Initial Cut per Acre... cies i oe name ects e cemaseede cene 108 The Cutting Cycle; Definition; Length ..............e eee ee cece eee tere eens 109 Revert uel (yer. ands aver w send, « hivd< > prererisieele Nalsbieds liteh/s de> ees tA 109 Growth on Virgin Forests; Intermittent Yields .....2...6.c.- cess ewe cece eens 110 Relation between the Cut Per Acre and the Cutting Cycle ..............-.5.-.005- 110 Similarity of Even-Aged and Many-Aged Forests ..........--2.-- sees eeee rece ees III Residual Growing Stock and Felling Reseryvey).7s 1.2. cos ded: Se siates dee eet eee es 112 Illustration of a Transition Cutting Cycle in a Normal Forest .................... 112 Witiate: Horm of the Porest:.\-cos «a. o EO O American Forest Regulation CHAPTER XII THE PROBLEM OF SUSTAINED YIELD The Ultimate _Problem—Sustained: Yield 2o0255 0.2000. ihc sthazesss scans ce aimee Allowed Cut, Empirical Yield Table and Normal Stock ..................-.ceee0e Comparison of Mean Annual Increment and Austrian Formula; Its Limitations ... Necessity for Dataon Age: Classes yaceitias seis cose chee lee inte 2.2 eet ns cicis =o. Cele Ay Method of ‘Separation: of Age Classesws.s. :.105 scl mieten eta cla.. Seekers Anplication .of Yield Tableto:the; Forest 70: . So aisn's cee ee were ee ss eee Separation of Stand Table into Age Classes): AAT... See ee eee Average sAge Of Groups) sActertectese sts Sis lve cles nohele te wcieio eo iote OnE een ate a cts ne anes Iiiustration fron CoconinomNational Horest ei).2)’a11'-.0 21 os eee ee cise a ees Immature’ AgeGlasses RVR Ben seals AE ee ei), on eee The Prediction of Actual or Empirical Yields for the Forest ...................- Application to''Group ‘Selection Forests: ..'.4.. (2288 wc od... ete ate one ee Coérdination of Cutting Cycle with Area and Volume of Existing Age Classes .... Comparison of Annual Cut by Methods of Regulation Proposed .................. Summary of Basic Principles 1:2 2:0 bo%).) o8!oi0 20 em oe a Oo. Oe Factors Indicating a Shortening of the Cutting Cycle; Illustrations .............. CUTZ. 5s. c bk Ria PN se Po bie BR TA ee, Ce Sr, CHAPTER Xi REGULATION OF FORESTS COMPOSED OF EVEN-AGED STANDS Regulation of Forests Composed of Even-Aged Stands .........0..cccccssccccvce Similarity of Problem with That of Many-Aged Forms ..................--+eeee- Application: to, Eastern: Mixed, Hardwoodsie.)2 5: fe5, 0. « seine aout sen cere Hee Predictionsor Yields ot Mixed Flardwoods) 2... ccmiert> «fel ssn tictoe ee tralia eter ee Correlation of Regulation with Methods Proposed’ ...............02.0-beeteswsles Coordination of Regulation with the Silvicultural Practice ...................+0- Tilustration,. Lodgapole Pie: is... o05 en 2532 os alos. Seis ek ee eee Cee Summary of Principles for American Regulation <......)..c..4< 1250 oo. 0 eres etc COU ahi, 5) oh Bhate scam setae to SACOG beso Pe ota ER re oUt same APPENDIX (a) Forest Management in Nine European States (after Martin) ................. (5). Financial ‘Rotations (after Endres)! ......c.)0<..cacs2 sche daehek tek Ue Growing Stock and Yield, Harvard Forest .3.:c0 0.0 aves keene seat cee ee eee Example of a Preliminary Policy Statement for Inyo National Forest .............. Results of Forest Management in Savoie, France ....:.......0--.+-c.ess estes ..cu ll Examples of Yield Calculations from National Forest ‘Management Plans,” 1921 ... Commient on Wolff Formtlat::..< «see sewrecisey cit vented oa: Bes fee ee 16€ 166 166 168 169 170 170 173 174 a, b, etc. A SYMBOLS USED EQUIVALENT Normal growing stock. Real or actual growing stock. Normal. Rotation. The difference between the age when the tree reaches merchantable size and the rotation age. Age when tree reaches merchantable size. Increment (c. a. i. and m.a.i. are symbols for current and mean annual increment). Number of years. Normal yield. Real or actual yield. Number of years within which to distribute the surplus or deficit. Mortality per cent (M is the symbol for German marks in appendix A). 1,000 feet board measure. Cutting cycle. Timber reserved after cutting. Final yield (in dollars). Intermediate yield (in dollars). Expenditures (if annual, symbol is AE$) capitalized. Costs (initial). Yield table figure for yield at 10 years, 20 years, etc. Area. TABLE Page 1. Economic Rotation for Pine, Spruce, Fir and Beech in Europe .................. 35 2. Synopsis of Gross Returns, Expenditures, and Mean Annual Net Returns in Dollars Per Acre for a Fully Stocked Quality TIT Spruce: Stand ,....05.......as«-.sees 40 3. Rate of, Interest Earned ig European Forestry n.0...<-+o0<0s¢ cane dieeanekes oneen 45 4. Value of Fully Stocked Stands of Loblolly Pine, etc. .............ccecceccccsccees 47 5. Cost of Growing Cordwood in Fully Stocked Stands of Loblolly Pine, etc. ....... 48 6. Interest Rates (Compound) to be Expected on Money Invested in Growing Ash, etc. 49 7... Lhe Financial Rotationmot White. Pinte 5.62.02 cc dine ache» sig/sie +/+ ba ag Sa ores 50 8a. Soil Expectation Value for Douglas Fir, Quality II Site, Western Cascades ...... 50-51 §. ,Xield of White Pine’m New. Hampshire 2. 0 | Zan : . Sarit doo Jia 2) és . E UP ts : vapl sie aT Janet ci. Sor 7 oor it br fe ‘i! ‘ise 7S river m ; fe Pw sol £.)3 Bois aa "po Bt es igs Saame ‘“@..,. Jefe 19 sone wf 2 ao tiie 7 a cn nhiey ple te eal eee |, rt (Pee, CRS ve ho) Sn gt oe 3) c= one 7 me init @ ~“Bbeiois 55) ee 5 : 7 ————————— St 7 Wa I I Tiler 4 ” ! fi (ove Pein, ot POLICY AND THEORY OF "REGULATION GEAP Tes I INTRODUCTION TO FOREST REGULATION 1. Definition and Significance of Forest Regulation. Forest Regulation* (syn. organization) is that branch of forestry which concerns itself with the organization of a forest property for management and maintenance, ordering in time and place the most advantageous use of the property, with the aim of securing a sustained yield. The broader term forest management includes all subjects dealing with the inventory, condition, and proper and systematic development of forest resources, and the organization and administration which will secure their continuous productiveness. Regulation aims chiefly at continuity of pro- ductiveness but also at utilizing to the fullest extent the resources under forest management; the normal timber capital is property held in trust, while the cut constitutes the owner’s returns. It is the most important ultimate goal of the forester to bring his forest property to a sustained yield so as to produce a nearly equal annual or periodic return. It is only by systematic regulation that permanent economic production can be secured. This principle of sustained yield is of importance to the individual and to the nation. It is customary for the private owner to require equalized returns on his invest- ments and the wood industry of the nation also requires fairly sustained annual production in order to keep wood-using industries in full operation. Serious depression, when industrial production is curtailed, may warrant a corresponding diminution of output from public and private forests. On the *It is important to differentiate clearly between forest economics, forest economy, forest finance, forest management, forest mensuration and forest regulation. Forest Economics (syn. Forest Policy). A comprehensive term including all matter referring to the position of forests in public affairs. Forest Economy. A comprehensive term including all matter dealing with the busi- ness aspects of forest management. (See also Fernow, B. F., Economics of Forestry, p. 103, 5th edition, New York.) Forest Finance. That branch of the science of forestry which relates to the forest as an investment. It includes two distinct subjects, Forest Valuation and Forest Statics; the first concerning valuations of soil and growing stock, increment, and damage; the second with a comparison of the financial results of different methods of treatment and other questions of profitableness and financial effects. Forest Management. The practice of the application of forestry in the conduct of the forest business. Forest Mensuration. That branch of forestry which deals with the determination of the volume of stands, trees, logs and other timber products, and with the study of growth and yield of trees and stands. I 2 American Forest Regulation other hand, in times of stress, as was evidenced in France during the War, a nation is fully justified in over-cutting its public and private forests for the good of the state. Of the technical factors which lead to an assured annual yield, the most important is the age of the different stands. For it is evident that if all the timber in a forest is immature, there can be no production of sawtimber until these individual stands ripen. If, however, all the timber is mature, the problem of securing a continuous yield of sawtimber may be assured, pro- vided the owner is willing to make certain sacrifices, often obligatory when part of the decadent and overmature timber is held without cutting for long periods. Russell and Roth (see § 12) have pointed out the hiatus in national timber production which is sure to follow our present era of destructive lumbering. Our national timber resources are largely composed of virgin stands* of mature and decadent timber and of idle cut-over land, much of it barren or only partially stocked, with valuable species; aside from woodlots there is but little forest land today in the United States stocked with middle-aged timber ; therefore it is easy to visualize what will happen when our virgin stands are destroyed; the nation surely will be confronted with a shortage of timber land stocked with merchantable timber. Our publicly owned forests will be insufficient in area to supply national demands. Even if we wake up to the need for permanent forest production before all our virgin timber is gone, we cannot now repair the damage in time to avert a serious shortage, because it takes from 60 to 120 years or more (see chapter IV-V) to produce saw- timber as contrasted with cordwood. Even if every acre of potential forest land were fully stocked with valuable immature timber, when the last of the virgin stands disappears, many sawmills must shut down until these areas of immature trees ripen. We would be in much the same situation that England was when the demand for ammunition overran the supply. Fac- tories capable of enormous production were being built but had not yet reached the production stage. Fortunately, in the industrial world such a shortage can soon be relieved, but in forest management we must face squarely the hiatus in production sure to occur if there are no middle-aged stands ready to grow into merchantable timber that is certain to be required by our rapidly increasing population. The owner of merchantable timber when deciding upon the proper cutting policy to adopt has three alternatives: (1) In anticipation of higher prices due to the predicted timber shortage he may carry his timber as a speculation ; (2) He may rapidly convert his stumpage into money and realize on his forest investment. High taxes and heavy carrying costs on forest and plant investments have induced practically all American lumbermen to follow this course; OF, (3) He can make a compromise between (1) or (2); but after the owner * Of course virgin stands contain young and middle aged timber but this is usually all destroyed by “destructive lumbering.” Introduction to Forest Regulation 3 has decided not to hold his timber as an investment against higher. prices ‘or to realize on his forest, there is still the important decision, how much to cut and when. This question must be answered by applied regulation, which should always aim at a sustained yield of timber and permanent production. It goes without saying, as Dr. Fernow has emphasized in his Introductory Note, that regulation cannot be successful without sound silviculture, nor are the two incompatible. Re-growth, ordinarily by natural regeneration, will always remain the sine qua non of successful forest management in the United States. 2. Conception of Regulation in Europe. It is instructive to see what the European idea of regulation is in the exact words of great foresters. Huffel,* the foremost French authority says: “The management (or regulation) of a forest includes all operations which aim at systematizing the cut.” He argues that public forest owners have only the right to income from properties and must pass the principal on to the future generations unimpaired; that this is the fundamental idea of forest regulation. He admits, however, that the private owner should be given more freedom in the use of his property according to his individual needs. All owners are, however, benefited by systematic forest working plans, “which indicate for a definite period, (1) ineuaate,.(2) tue method, (3) the.location, (4) the extent,,(degree) of all fellings which will be made in the forest.” The German and Austrian definitions** emphasize profit, orderliness and continued yield: Judeich (Saxony) says: “The object of forest management is the most profitable use of soil or mana for raising timber-:....: . The task of regulation is to order in time and place the entire management or business of the forest, in such a manner that the object of the management is accomplished as fully as possible.” According to Martin (Prussia and Saxony) forest regulation, “comprises the measures necessary to conduct an orderly forest manage- meits-ts4-. Regulation forms the most important subject of instruction in the business of management of the forest........ The most important task of regulation is to direct the order or progress of the harvest or cut and removal of the several stands of timber........ The most difficult and yet the most important task in the preliminary work is a suitable division of the forest into permanent sub-divisions.” Von Guttenberg (Austria) defines regulation as, “that part of the science of forestry (and particularly of forest management) which attempts a well planned order and arrangement of the entire manage- ment of a forest, and especially the regulation of the cut in order to assure the most profitable and sustained yield or income from the property.” Stoetzer (Saxony) also bears on the sustained yield idea and adds other details to his definition of what regulation is: * Huffel, G., Economie Forestiere, Tome Troisiéme, 1907, pp. 4, 7, & 12. ** Adapted from the appendix of F. Roth’s Forest Regulation, pp. 203-218. 4 American Forest Regulation Si ygiigs It maintains order in the management of a forest; it regulates particularly the manner and time of cutting........ ; it plans to restock the land with new stands of trees, and it determines the amount of timber which may be cut each year without diminishing the wood capital or endangering the continuance of such a cut for the future... ..... The provisions of forest regulation are not employed for individual stands of timber, cut at intervals of many years, but apply to forests where a yearly cut of timber is possible and is demanded.” 3. Scope of Regulation. As a matter of fact, the correct regulation of cut on a forest requires a complete and detailed study of all local and general conditions. Regulation depends on correct answers to the economic, business and technical problems presented. It is most intimately linked with (a) Stock taking and growth, included in mensuration (Business group), (b) Policy and history (Economics), (c) Forest finance (Business), and (d) Sil- viculture, protection and lumbering (Technical). But the more the following diagram (after Chapman, page 4, Forest Mensuration, John Wiley & Sons) is studied, the clearer becomes the interrelation between forest regulation and the parts of the physical, mathematical and human groups: RELATION OF REGULATION TO OTHER SUBJECTS IN FORESTRY Group Economics Business Technique Human Mathematical Physical Basis A Physics Mathematics Chemistre Sciences ere Accounting Surveying Geology Economics Botany Zoology Mechanics Forest Forest Forest Forest Physiography Forest Economics Finance Surveying Dendrology Sciences Forest Forest Forest Ecology History Mensuration Forest Entomology Wood Technology Applied —— Sciences Forest Policy Silviculture Economic Forest Engineering and and Laws Lumbering Technical Wood Using Industries Forest Protection Business or Forest Protection Organization Lumber Business Forestry Practice 4. Land -Classification, an Initial Step. As our industrial development continues, land originally classified as chiefly valuable for forest production may eventually be devoted to other uses. But before regulation can be intelligently planned, it is obviously necessary that the land classification must clearly differentiate for the time being between agricultural and forest soils. If the estimate of permanent production is based partly on stands growing on agricultural land soon to be cleared, the whole arrangement will Introduction to Forest Regulation 5 be disrupted if this land must be withdrawn from the forest for purely agricultural uses. 5. Details Must be Systematized in Working Plans. Forest Regulation or Forest Organization is therefore the systematic and orderly presentation of the business* of Forest Management usually embodied in a formal working plan which is: The plan or plans under which a given forest property ts to be continuously managed. Annual or periodic plans may be based on the general working plan and may refer to any specified class of work, as the annual cutting, planting, protection, grazing, or administration and improvement plan. Such annual plans may be either mere “schedules or may contain more or less detail, explanations, estimates of cost and results, as seems desirable. Details of forest management must be systematized to avoid waste. The past and the future policy upon which forest management is based must be clearly presented to the manager and the basic local economic data** con- cerning the area must be collected so the forest can be divided to suit the system of silviculture and intensiveness of treatment. Then the essential regulation of cut—the soul of forest regulation—can be determined and the time to cut each compartment decided upon. In American forest regulation silviculture will usually take precedence over the mere dictates of forest mathe- matics, but the two of course should be correlated. Without system, the work of one manager is lost to his successor. The manager who “carries the data in his head” is the forester of the past gener- ation; he is the sort of man who is eliminated by the modern board of directors who insist on constructive business efficiency. 6. Progress of American Regulation in Early Working Plans. The prog- ress of Forest Regulation in a country is a sure indication of the intensiveness of forest administration. Every annual report in British India catalogues the area under working plans, because this is considered a criterion of advance- ment. But in the United States, curiously enough, while the initial work of trained foresters was early centered in the preparation and publication of working plans for private timber lands, yet today there are few plans for public forests, although the regulation ideal has never been lost sight of. But judging from the interest in management that has arisen during the past year (see appendix E), the present lack of really effective National Forest plans will soon be remedied. The earliest published plan*** set the standard for private working plans and origi- nated diameter limit methods* of regulating the cut which were blindly followed in other plans without regard to type, or character of cutting and silviculture. A method which might give passable temporary results in the tolerant spruce forests of the Adirondacks * Chapman, H. H., Working Plans (P. S. A. F., Vol. X, pp. 376-383, 1915). ** Chapman, H. H., Forest Mensuration, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1921. *** Graves, H. S., Practical Forestry in the Adirondacks (Bureau of Forestry Bulletin, 1899). * Moore, Barrington, Working Plans: Past History, Present Situation, and Future Development. (P.S. A. F., Vol. X, pp. 217-259.) 6 American Forest Regulation naturally failed when applied without modification to almost clear cutting in the intolerant pineries of the South. According to Olmstead,* “The yield to be expected from cutover lands shows a high return from the capital invested in them... . cutting to... . twelve inches breast high (fourteen inches stump) . . . . with stumpage at two dollars (now one fifty), land at one dollar per acre... . the annual interest represented by the future crop on cutover lands for a period of forty years, is nearly nine per cent... . The lands which have been cut over will be producing timber, which at a conservative estimate represents an income of 8.8% on the capital invested in them.” This calculation applies to short-leaf and loblolly pines in the South, but Fernow** says, “The real interest which the above quoted example will give is about 51%4%. This is considerably different from 9%.” The reason why working plans for private lands were so important a part of the work of the Bureau of Forestry (prior to the establishment of the Forest Service on February I, 1905) was that these were but a means to an end—a useful method for advertising forestry, a propaganda which proved entirely successful in enabling a technical bureau to assume charge of the National Forests (then termed Forest Reserves). The technical failures of these early plans according to one writer,*** were due to putting future interests ahead of the present, a failure to understand that the lumberman’s wanton destruction of forests was dictated by economic factors; this latter shortcoming was because they had not received a proper business training. These plans attempted the impossible and copied too closely the European counterpart. Where less was attempted, a greater measure of success was secured.* This early activity in working plans was under the artificial stimulus of a propaganda campaign. A measure of technical success it is true was attained in the woodlot plans because here the main emphasis was placed on silviculture (and especially on the immediate execu- tion of sample thinnings) rather than on regulation. 7. Stock Taking by the Forest Service Preliminary to Regulation. When on February 1, 1905 the Bureau of Forestry was given the National Forests to administer, the problems of organization, fire protection, grazing, improve- ment and the sale of timber occupied the attention of those in charge. Sporadic attempts were made to draw up preliminary working plans but the main expenditures during the next decade were on mapping and estimating. These data were for timber sales and for rough purposes of regulation—to prevent overcutting. Generally speaking these early estimates have proved too inaccurate for the modern timber sale appraisal unless corrected by com- paring them with the results of cutting in timber sales—and even then the results are not wholly satisfactory. All of the rough estimating eventually will have to be done over again. This was to be expected and it can safely be said that as a policy a rough estimate for every forest was entirely proper because it cost perhaps but a cent or two an acre. As a result of normal economic development more accurate estimates will be justified later on. Forest history certainly justifies the rough timber survey of a forest area as * Olmstead, F. E., “Working Plan for Forest Land Near Pine Bluff, Ark.” (Bureau of Forestry, Bulletin 32, 1902, page 44.) ** Fernow, B. E. (Forestry Quarterly, Vol. I, page 32, note). *** Thid., pp. 221-222. *Foley, John. Conservative Lumbering at Sewanee, Tennessee. (Bureau of Forestry, Bulletin 39, 1903.) Introduction to Forest Regulation 7 an initial step in regulation. Only high stumpage prices and intensive markets justify costly and intensive estimates. Preliminary regulation requires not only a knowledge of the resources but equally important, sys- tematic data on the marketing, manufacture, and utilization of the product and basic information on silvicultural practice. During this initial period of development no satisfactory or practical regulation scheme was developed, notwithstanding a number of attempts. According to the 1919 Forest Service Manual (Reg. S-2), the limitation of cut is now as follows: “The Secretary of Agriculture will prescribe from time to time, upon data furnished by the Forester, the maximum amount of matured and large-growth timber which may be cut by years or other periods, on each National Forest or other unit.” In many countries the annual cut is fixed by the Secretary (the ranking official) since the technical services in principle should not establish the allowed cut for the forests they supervise. Probably more effective results would be obtained in the United States if the limitation of cut on National Forests were checked and correlated by an inde- pendent forestry advisor actually serving in the office of the Secretary of Agriculture. At present the limitation of cut figures are prepared by the Forest Service and the Secre- tary’s approval is purely perfunctory. But such a plan of re-organization will probably not be adopted because of the additional cost. Today efforts are continued to systematize estimating and mapping, since accurate regulation of cut as a vital problem by itself can only follow reliable estimating which in turn is dependent on appropriations; until very recently estimating on National Forests was frankly based chiefly on timber sales demands but now the policy has been changed so as to give more emphasis to obligatory regulation. 8. Regulation on Privately Owned Property. Strictly speaking, there has been no regulation on private, state, or institutional lands. On the Vanderbilt property near Asheville (now Pisgah National Forest and Game Preserve) silviculture dominated the early cutting policy, but today the forest is being heavily culled prior to its being turned over to the United States. On the Whitney and Webb tracts in the Adirondacks the regulation of cut has been made subservient to a good business showing. Yale has managed the forest property of the New Haven Water Company,* but systematic regulation has not been commenced because good silviculture demanded the removal of diseased chestnuts, and a formal working plan has thus far been deemed unnecessary. Improvement thinnings and planting rather than regulation was what the forest needed. Similar conditions have dictated the policy at Sewanee, Tennessee and at Syracuse, N. Y. (State College of Forestry), where important school forests are being successfully managed. Of college forests the Harvard Forest alone has been really regulated during the past ten years. Silviculture must come first, to be sure, but during the initial period, it appears only too easy, even for technical forest schools, to minimize the need for systematic mandatory regulation. It is predicted that regulation will come into increasing prominence during the next decade. For without a systematic attempt to regulate the forest for continuous production in accordance with correct silviculture, forest management cannot be put into effect. g. Quiz. What is the distinction between forest regulation and forest finance? forest mensuration? * Hawley, R. C., Bulletin 3, Yale School of Forestry, 1913. American Forest Regulation What are the essentials of a definition of regulation? In what particulars do different authors vary in their definitions of regulation? Why were working plans made for private timber lands prior to 1905? How was forestry benefited by this? Why did these plans fail technically? Why were calculations of profit too high? Why are working plans now being developed for National Forests? Why were rough timber surveys justified? What restrictions as to timber sales are now made by the Forest Service? Which should come first, silviculture or regulation; should the two be correlated? What replaces regulation on privately owned forests and why? CHAPTER II BACKGROUND OF A REGULATION POLICY AND SUSTAINED YIELD to. Basic Conditions. Gifford Pinchot, in an address delivered in Ig2r, declared that the United States must have a National forest policy for the conservation and regulation of forests. More than half of our original timber has been cut and burned away. We are cutting what remains more than four times faster than it is being reproduced. Three-fourths of what we have now will be cut within twenty-five years. When our own timber is exhausted, neither in Canada nor in Mexico nor elsewhere in all the world can we get the kinds and quantities of timber that we need. The supply of timber indispensably necessary to keep our agriculture, mining, manu- facture and transportation productive and prosperous is the greatest and most far reaching economic question now before the people of the United States. One-fifth of the timber of the United States is in State and National Forests (almost wholly in the latter). Four-fifths is in private hands, and is being destroyed as rapidly as ever. If we are to mitigate or escape the timber famine which is now clearly ahead, forest devastation on the privately owned commercial timberland must stop. Already more than eighty million acres of forest lands in America have been so completely devastated that they produce nothing, and the lumbermen are extending this devastation every year over a total of new land as large as the whole State of Connecticut. A National forest policy, to be effective, must put a stop to forest devasta- tion, control or prevent forest fires, and provide for raising at home the timber without which the United States cannot even exist as an organized community, to say nothing of the safety, prosperity and comfort of our people. The forest policy of the United States, Mr. Pinchot points out, must be nation-wide for many reasons. Already more than three-fourths of our people live in the states whose forests are unable to supply their own needs for lumber. All of our greatest agricultural and industrial communities are in the thirty-three timber-importing states. The timber-importing states are rapidly increasing in number and the timber exporting states rapidly dimin- ishing. The timber-importing states contain four-fifths of our agricultural values, and nine-tenths of our manufactures are produced in them. Seventy per cent of the lumber used in America is consumed outside the state in which it is cut. Half of the timber left in the United States is in the three states of Washington, Oregon, and California, which contain but five per cent of our population. How to get lumber is a far more pressing problem for the states which do not have it than for the states which do. It takes more wood used in more ways to feed, clothe, and house the city dweller than the farmer or the mountaineer—the people far from the forest than those who live in or near it. The only way to prevent control of lumbering on te) American Forest Regulation privately owned timberlands from imposing unfair and unequal burdens is to make it National and, therefore, uniform throughout the Nation. The only control that can be impartially enforced is National control. The only control that can be kept free from politics is National control. National control can be adapted to local conditions fully as well as state control. The only organization prepared to enforce control, with full knowledge, long experience, and undisputed character and ability, is the United States Forest Service, which has been doing with marked success in the National Forests almost exactly what National control would have it do on commercial timber- lands. National control through the power to tax is simple, easy of enforce- ment, and in accordance with our way of doing things, and would require little or no machinery beyond that already in existence. So run the facts and arguments in Mr. Pinchot’s address.* 11. Basic Studies. Since forest lands cover one-fourth the area of the United States, their development and use will become increasingly important as this shortage of forest products develops. This development and use will depend: (1) On the policy of the owner; (2) on the economic conditions that affect values; (3) on the exact silvical knowledge available. This third con- dition is fundamental, because policy and values are so closely linked with thorough knowledge of growth and silviculture. The study of volumes and growth are important branches of forest research, but all research, directly or indirectly, aims at the solution of the problems underlying forest regu- lation. To be sure, there must be a balance between policy, economic con- ditions, and the results of research; but research is often so all important a problem that it may come first. At present there is a tendency to give eco- nomics too much prominence. Shall timber sales sway absolutely forest regulation? Or will regulation influence the business of lumbering? This general question must be decided in each case on its merits, but the true ideal of forestry is unquestionably to put sound regulation (based on research) first. : 12. Curtailment of Production. Recent attempts to curtail normal govern- ment timber sales on the Pacific Coast so as to relieve the private owner of competition, are needless and unwise; and yet recently a forester proposed that the regulation of the private timber resources in the South to prevent too rapid exhaustion might demand assigning a cut to that region with the * An interesting proposal is made by Roth and enlarged upon by Watson (J. of F., Dec., 1921, pp. 817-835, “Sustained Annual Yield as a National Policy of Forestry”) to organize and plan for forests cut by any accepted method, but to protect the actual growing stock by allowing only the cutting of one-third the basal area per forty acres every twenty years. This would certainly tend to stop forest devastation and would prolong the cut but like rigid diameter limit systems is too artificial to be generally applied throughout the country to all types of stand. Watson is, however, on the right track when he states (in the article cited above) that: “It has been shown in the pre- vious pages that neither satisfactory fire protection, silviculture, nor a system of taxation of private lands can well be established until the forest properties of the United States, private as well as Federal or State, are brought under a form of continuous forest production . . . . some form of forest regulation is needed . . . . in a mandatory fashion.” Regulation Policy and Sustained Yield II object of forcing some owners there not to cut more than a certain amount. This amount could be gauged by the potential productivity of the soil, and would be dictated by the future danger of a timber shortage. This is a bold plan, but indicates how regulation may sway the economic problem of pro- duction. With the laying waste of forest lands owing to overcutting, such as has taken place in the Lake States, how long will it be before soil values can be restored? Unquestionably it will be years, and the expense will be many times the cost of cutting more conservatively in the beginning. This truism is fundamental of good forestry. Watson* figures the possible annual growth from all timber lands in the United States at about the amount now used, but before the possible annual growth can be secured, from fifty to a hundred years must elapse. In other words, past overcutting means a hiatus in our national sustained yield (see § 1). 13. Coytinuous Forest Production. Ina broad sense the policy of holding timber lands on the basis of continuous forest production means: (1) Stabil- izing the lumber industry, (2) the adoption of a true and sound forest policy, (3) a solution of important land and forest labor problems of the country; (4) provision for permanent cheap transportation in the forest. As soon as timber lands, both public and private, can be placed on the basis of permanent forest production, the greatest advance will have been made in national conservation—the first step towards the termination of forest destruction. 14. Early Western Land Policy and Its Results. Conditions in the West** during the past half century have led away from systematic regulation rather than towards it. " First the Government tried to dispose of its land for revenue and railroad development; then for the benefit of settlers, and throughout the application of the public land policy, there were always frauds which involve astounding values in public property. In the West, too, frequently the citizen endeavored to beat the United States, and to see how he could get around the law. The laws, themselves often impractical, encouraged this viewpoint, and there was unbridled exploitation of resources with no regard for the future; (a) in agriculture (where the soil was “cropped’’) ; (b) in land speculation; (c) in forest devastation; (d) in extravagant methods of mining; (e) in illegal fencing; (f) in the free disposal of water-power and water-power sites; (g) in survey frauds; (h) in swamp-land frauds; (i) in the profligate disposal of railroad land grants; (j) in homestead com- mutation. The Public Lands Commission reported: “Detailed study of the practical operation of the present land laws, particularly of the desert land and commutation clause of the Homestead Act, shows that their tendency far too often is to bring about land monopoly rather than to multiply small holdings by actual settlers . .... The settler is at a marked disadvantage in com- parison with the shrewd business man who aims to acquire large properties, There has been spoliation and illegality due to the weakness in laws, speculation and corrup- tion of petty officials appointed for political reasons.” * Russell Watson (J. of F., 1921, pp. 390-393). ** Hill, Robert Tudor, “The Public Domain and Democracy” (Columbia University, IQIO). 12 American Forest Regulation According to Hill,* “The situation seems partially to reduce itself to this: (1) Exploitation of natural resources has produced waste, and future social interests have been disregarded. (2) Frauds against individuals and society at large represented by the Government, have been encouraged and perpetrated on a large scale, and private and public dishonesty has ensued. (3) Public estate has been used for private interest on a large scale. It takes time for social ideals to change. Social disapproval has been extended far enough to pre- vent the individual from holding himself superior to law.” The paragraph numbers have been inserted to give force to Mr. Hill’s conclusions. Thus, as a background to forest regulation in the West, we have the doctrine of individual liberty, the opening of the public domain to give away the natural resources which were fast disappearing. One of the** troubles with the early western administration, was that business principles were needed just as if the public domain were a private estate. When an efficient administration of the National Forests was com- menced, misunderstandings of policy and objections to the rules and regula- tions were prevalent. The mining interests were afraid that they were going to be unable to proceed unmolested and unrestrained, and that they would not get timber at a reasonable cost. The grazing interests were afraid that restricted grazing would mean confiscation of their stock, and before the repeal of the lieu land-selection law, all the public feared that the large owners would denude their land and then exchange it for script. Such objections, which were most potent in northern California, found some vent in other parts of the West.*** These fears have been disproven. 15. Effect of Economic Lumbering on Forest Management. A study* of the lumber industry by the Forest Service has shown clearly that “forest conservation is affected by economic conditions in manufactures whose raw material is wood. Demoralized lumber markets affect the value of timber, the stability of its ownership, the degree to which it is wasted in exploitation, and the possibility of carrying out any far-sighted plan of forest renewals,” the need for broad gauge- regulation is all the more important. According to Greeley, “. . . . the main problem of the lumber industry is a forest problem. It is a problem which has grown out of quantities of cheap timber acquired from the public domain.” Greeley shows that the West has a surplus of saw-mills and logging camps, that there has been speculation in timber, that owners have over invested, that mill capacity has been excessive, and there have been poor methods of finance, and low efficiency in manufacture and in salesmanship; that com- petition has been destructive. And yet unquestionably, as Greeley shows, “the public is vitally interested in the prosperity of the lumber industry in * Ibid., page 215. ** Woodruff, G. W., “The Disposal of Public Lands.” (Proceedings S.A.F., March 10, 1904, page 53.) *** Potter, Albert F. “Objections to the Forest Reserves in Northern California” (P. S. A. F. Vol. 1, 1904, page 50). * Greeley, W. B. “Some Public and Economic Aspects of the Lumber Industry” (part 1, Secretary of Agriculture, Report No. 114, 1917). Regulation Policy and Sustained Yield 13 regions where it is the dominant factor in the economic life of the com- munity.” Unquestionably there is need for “a more suitable kind of forest ownership . .. . the extension of public forest ownership . . ... is needed. Private ownership has shown itself ill fitted to the task . private coOperation in taxation and fire-protection . . . . reasonable public Feenlation of the handling of private lands will unquestionably find a place in working out the problem.” The conclusions are that within the next two decades there will be local timber shortage, hastened by over-production due to the wrong kind of ownership. ‘The answer to all these evils which Greeley has enumerated in his study of the lumber industry is unquestionably broad gauge forest regu- lation, which primarily must be based upon the study of growth because, as already emphasized, without knowledge of the rapidity of timber production per acre, the regulator of forests has little chance of giving correct answers to the various problems. The public must cooperate with the private owner to make a regulation of cut a practical business. There are people today who fear regulation of cut and the curtailment of lumbering operations and the consequent restriction of local development. We have simply reached another stage in the manage- ment of our national forest wealth,—the obligatory regulation stage,—and this does necessitate some present day sacrifices for increased future benefits. According to an unpublished paper by Zon, “Another persistent fallacy is that forestry cannot be profitably practiced unless stumpage prices are high enough to raise timber to maturity on a bare tract at a profit above all costs including compound interest. If we are to allow our forests to be turned into deserts and then expect to reclaim them by planting, the chances for having in this country any forests at all, are very slim indeed.” If forests are completely wrecked, it will take a century or so to repair the loss. According to present estimates, private owners have fifty to sixty years of supply at the present rate of cutting. There is an annual demand of approximately one hundred billion feet a year, forty billion for lumber, and sixty billion for ties, poles, fuel, and fencing. To supply such an enor- mous demand there is need of young age classes to grow the forests of the future. According to Zon, “Tf all our forests were placed at once on a sustained yield basis, they would absolutely produce the annual supply of wood needed in this country.” But today the lumberman is afraid of regulation. Under present condi- tions there has been over investment by the lumber industry. Owing to the high cost of capital, the incentive to destroy the forest investment as soon as possible in order to reduce the carrying charges has predominated. 16. Possible Solutions; Restricted Private Control, or Public Ownership? There are two possible solutions to this problem; control of theeprivate indi- vidual, and restriction as to how he shall use his forests, or, ownership by the public. Because of American Democracy the viewpoint that the public must own most of the forests, is, in many ways, logical, but a large proportion will of necessity remain in the hands of the individual. Toumey* says, * Toumey, J. W., Who shall Own the Forests (Yale Review, Oct., 1913, p. 156). 14 American Forest Regulation “Can you look forward to the time when at least one-half of our permanent forest area will be publicly owned? If not, our private forests must come under governmental control, with prescribed methods of management. Future development in American forestry must be in one or the other of these directions. The writer believes public ownership is far more in harmony with American instincts, and more acceptable to the great body of American people.” 1 If the private owner, notwithstanding carrying charges imposed by taxa~ tion and interest on his investment, desires to own forest land, and yet refuses to adopt conservative methods of treatment, what is the solution? With a situation such as this, an ex-appropriation of at least those forests which cover erodable slopes and water-sheds will unquestionably be forced in the interests of the public. For forests in level country, that are merely supply forests, perhaps conservation has not advanced far enough in this country to justify at once federal or state control. Time will tell. Fernow* in discussing the control of small owners says: “The former may be largely left to the free exercise of private enterprise, and this will probably be the answer to the regulation problem so far as it touches the small owner; he will not brook control, and so long as he is willing to fight it, probably he will have his own way.” Kirkland** argues that public ownership is not necessary even to secure a sustained annual yield; that it would be practicable to put the forest industry on a permanent producing basis by establishing a central association of American forest industries which should classify, finance, organize, and standardize the business of the members, and most important of all regulate output and prices. “The only effective maintenance of price must be one through limitation of the quantity placed on the market. The only sound limitation of the amount to be marketed annually is that imposed by what this resource will produce continuously, Bad as that forestry is which overcuts any given producing unit, that which undercuts is still worse because it neither furnishes revenue to the owner nor supplies the consumer with product.” Fernow for one does not believe in the practicability of Kirkland’s plan nor does the writer, unless this suggested association of private forest owners is under National control—an association of private owners and producers under the guidance of the Forest Service would undoubtedly work efficiently and may be the solution of preventing the present devastation. 17. Policy and Definition of Sustained Yield. Granting that there must be public control of forests, we have then to answer the question, Shall the cut be according to the principle of a sustained yield or shall economic con- ditions and fiscal expediency gain the ascendency in the decision as to “How much must be cut’? Sustained yield is the yield or cut of timber from a forest which is managed * Fernow, B. E., Economics of Forestry, New York (5th Edition, p. 271). ** Kirkland, Bert T., Continuous Forest Production of Privately Owned Timberlands as a solution of the Economic Difficulties of the Lumber Industry. (Journal of Forestry, Vol. XV, 1917, pp. 15-64.) Regulation Policy and Sustained Vield 15 in such a way as to permit the removal of an approximately equal volume of timber annually or periodically. It is argued* that a sustained annual yield gives the best social results, the best investment, the safest management. In Europe there can be no question but that forest workers, with permanent work in their local valleys, are better off than they are in temporary logging camps of the United States. 18. Comparison with Conditions in France. According to Huffel, the foremost French authority,** the arguments in favor of an annual yield are summarized as follows: most wood products will not stand long distance transportation so that it is better to cater to local markets which are often dependent upon an annual wood supply for their prosperity; a sustained cut is better for lumberjacks and teamsters as well as for wood using industries; an annual revenue is best for the owner of forests; it is of less moment to the state but a necessity for many communes and individuals. This annual yield should not be too unequal because of the drawbacks to labor and local industries dependent upon a supply of wood. For this reason and on account of the dictates of good silviculture, increases or decreases in growing stock should be gradual. But the divergence between the intensive forests of France, for example, and the working circle » of the Pacific Coast is so great that it is very confusing. In the one case (France) the working plan may regulate a working circle of but a few thousand acres; in the other case perhaps it takes two hundred thousand acres or more to form a circle that will yield a large enough cut to justify the maintenance of the local timber-using mills and industries. In France, for example, the valley is tributary to a small group of saw mills; here the unit of sustained yield is smaller, simply because of its more advanced state of forest development, and because of the local labor and market conditions which demand an annual cut, and an annual cut convenient to the homes of the workers. One does not find in France the large scale railroad logging of the United States. Wagon roads permit easy hauling at any point; each little hamlet has its constant annual wood and timber needs; the social and economic conditions are absolutely different, and therefore working plans and regulation in the two countries must be built on different lines. Often the principles are the same, but the application’ of methods in the Western United States must be broader, and must be changed to conform with the different problems that are to be solved. Perhaps in some localities on National Forests fire protection must come first, and strict regulation of timber must be retarded for another decade or two. Perhaps for a time the pressure for timber sales may lead forest administrators to adopt a policy of giving precedence to timber sales exami- nations over areas which should be cruised for management reasons; whether due to low appropriations or not, this is unfortunate and is now being modified on some National Forests; but under existing conditions may for a short-time continue to be a necessary economic result. Without permanent efficient transportation owned by the forest proprietor the present temporary large scale logging camp, uprooted when the locality is cut, is a natural consequence of economic.conditions.. The forest workers must suffer; the social evils attendant to a shifting population are proverbial; what is more familiar than the-wastage and extravagance after a winter’s work in the woods! Yet in the Eastern United States after two centuries of logging these conditions still exist because large scale logging is so customary. With permanent sawmill industries and local workers (with families) different social conditions would come logically and naturally as in Europe. 19. Financial Aspect of a Sustained Yield. Usually investments yield semi-annual or quarterly returns and recently attempts have been made to * Kirkland, Bert T., The Need of Working Plans on National Forests and the Policies Which Should Be Embodied in Them (P. S. A. F. Vol. X, 1915, pp. 341-371). ** Huffel, G., already cited, pp. 9-12. 16 American Forest Regulation popularize monthly dividends. To meet the minimum demand for an annual income sustained yield production of forests is necessary. The recent studies of the lumber industry* indicate that better financial results (because of over- production under existing methods of wrecking the forest property) can be brought about only by, “A more stable kind of forest ownership, divorced from manufacture to a larger degree than now, must come about before the ills of the lumber business can be perma- nently cured . . . . Private ownership has shown itself ill-fitted to the task, at least in the larger forest regions.” Legitimate demands for timber must be met, but forced sales** should be discouraged. Then too, it is generally recognized that present methods of taxation*** are an incentive to over-production, since the operator must try to create a demand for his timber rather than to hold it for permanent pro- duction. It is interesting to bear in mind that a 15 per cent tax on the final yield of private stands would yield about the same revenue on the Pacific Coast, as is at present received by the communities from the 25 per cent tax on current production of all timber cut from the National Forests. 20. Sustained Yield on Public Forests. Even as early as 1905 the govern- ment has idealized a sustained yield. In an early working plan* for private lands it was argued: “The object should be to get a sustained yield from as small an area as possible, provided this does not materially interfere with, or increase the cost of present opera- tions. The smaller the area the smaller the invested capital and the yearly tax list, and in the long run this means the saving of a considerable sum of money.” The public naturally expects the National Forests to be models of permanent forest production. Why then has not a sustained yield management been adopted? The answer** is: (1) That there are physical limitations that are now insurmountable owing to inac- cessibility and lack of transportation. ‘“*** primary transportation must precede any kind of forest management.” (2) Competition with private stumpage more conveniently located would necessitate reducing prices below the danger point if national timber sales had to be forced. “A sustained annual yield presupposes a sustained market,” which is rarely available. (3) The National Forests are a great resource which cannot be depreciated or forced on a market which is glutted with cheap private stumpage. Yet as is pointed out,*** « . , management with or without the sustained yield principle is totally unrelated to the policy followed in pricing stumpage . . . .,” according to the appraisal system now in force on National Forests. * Greeley, W. B., Studies of the Lumber Industry, Part I (U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, Report No. 114, 1917, p. 4-5). ** Tbid., page 95. *** Hutton, G. W. and Hapham, E. E., Forest Taxation as a Factor in Forest Manage- ment. (P.S. A. F. Volume 13, 1916, pp. 50.) * Chapman, C. S., A Working Plan for Forest Lands in Berkley County, S. Car. (Bureau of Forestry, Bulletin 1905, p. 50). ** Greeley, W. B., National Forest Sales on the Pacific Coast (P. S. A. F. Vol. VII, PP. 42-50). *** Greeley, W. B., Working Plans on National Forests (P. S. A. F. Vol. X¥%, pp. 84-85). Regulation Policy and Sustained Yield 17 Moore* argued that sustained yield is not necessary “where the community forming the natural market for the timber is not dependent on National Forest material,—that is, where material can be brought in from the outside as cheaply as it can be produced locally— .. . . where there is no local market for the timber, . . . . and where . . the possible annual sustained yield is too small to warrant the building up of a community dependent solely on lumbering.” The writer agrees that during the development stage of forest management there will be innumerable instances where a sustained yield (either annual or periodic) will be at present out of the question for practical reasons. One must bear in mind that after the first few periods there can still be permanent production even if a strict sustained yield does not commence until after the first improvement fellings have removed the overmature and diseased timber. In virgin forests often good silviculture and a theoretical sustained yield during the first rotation do not go hand in hand. One reason why there has been so much divergence of argument regarding sustained yield is that it has been idealized and its practical limitations** not sufficiently appraised. 21. Sustained Yield Objectives and Difficulties in Practice. The policy of the owner and his objective in managing the forest is always the first con- sideration in forestry, and will ordinarily determine the whole course of unrestricted management. The private owner may put financial returns first. The public owner may not desire to manage the forest from a strict dollars and cents standpoint, but may wish to preserve the stand, so as to conserve an important water supply, or keep the forest as a recreation ground for the public. In any event, the forest resource must be maintained in a state of maximum and continuous production. Hence the principle of sustained yield enters in, because the ideal of management is the maintenance of the largest possible continuous yield. A continuous yield is just as important in forestry as in any other kind of business. It is more difficult in forestry than other forms of business, because of the length of time required for crop production. These difficulties necessitate special plans to accomplish a sus- tained yield, which can rarely be attained during the initial years of man- agement. 22. Summary of Limitations on a Sustained Yield Policy. In arguing for a sustained yield one must not overlook certain limitations; the principle of sustained yield may be correct but it may not be practicable for a number of reasons: (1) It is fundamental that the land must be chiefly valuable for forest purposes. Obviously it would be shortsighted to plan for permanent production on any area, without first inquiring whether the soil itself was now chiefly valuable for agriculture. (2) Transportation facilities may not permit. If there is poor transportation, this may prove a practicable argument towards cutting more than the amount warranted on the basis of permanent production, in order to meet large and temporary transpor- tation charges incident to the construction of expensive logging railways. Such a situation is unfortunate. * Moore, Barrington, Methods for Regulating the Cut on National Forests (P.S.A.F., Wiel. VII; 1ot2;p. 12). ** Woolsey, T. S., Jr., Forest Service Silviculture Plans (P. S. A. F., Vol. XI, 1916, Pp. I-17, especially pp. 15-16). 18 American Forest Regulation (3) The market for timber products may be insufficient to utilize the entire amount or the quality of timber produced. Perhaps there are accessible and readily salable bodies of timber which are being wrecked, in order that the soil may be used for agri- culture, which will for the time being, compete with the owner who desires ultimately to adopt the sustained yield principle. This condition is typical of extensive forest conditions where a final land classification has not been made, and where economic conditions governing the sale of forest products are unsettled. (4) The silvicultural needs of a forest may necessitate the rapid removal of over- mature timber. Perhaps large areas of mature age classes demand the installation of mills whose capacity cannot possibly be supplied when once the excess growing stock has been reduced to normal. (5) The demand for timber products may fluctuate according to the development of cities, mines, or other chance local development, with profitable export of only the higher grades of lumber. (6) Acts of Providence will always exert an influence against the successful adoption of a sustained yield. Fire, insect attacks, disease, windfall (and perhaps war) may all tend to derange the application of an exact sustained yield. For example, even in well regulated forests abroad the variation in the annual yield is considerable. In the Forest* of Retz (France) the cut in 1863 was fixed at 987,671 cubic feet; in 1877, 1,218,055; in 1887, 996,535; in 1806, 1,241,736, and in 1902, 1,014,319. Such variations in a regulated forest under intensive economic demand indicates how much greater these variations will be under American conditions. (7) Of less importance, but withal to be reckoned with, is the personal factor in forest administration. From forest history we know that the tendency of administra- tions is to overcut or undercut. Some administrators (British India is an example) desire to make a good financial showing; consequently, they may be led to cut more than the forest produces, unless they are restrained by working plans based on a clear knowledge of forest production. Other administrators (as evidenced by France) may undercut the forest, sometimes with poor results, because it means the accumulation of over-mature timber and consequently increased danger from disease, windfall, and insect infestations. Changes in regeneration methods may disarrange for the time being the regulated cut. (8) One of the greatest obstacles to a sustained yield is the character of the forests themselves; the fact that so far the cut has generally been from virgin forests often of mixed species, instead of from second growth or grown as even-aged stands free from’ suppression. (See paragraph 108.) The sustained yield management ideal is thus something to steer by. It is not so unattainable as the normal forest, but nevertheless there are many pitfalls before it can be reached. The administrator and student of forest production must bear in mind that permanent production is safeguarded by frankly acknowledging a sustained yield policy for working circles of reason- able proportion. The working plans officer must be enough of an idealist to combat the every day arguments of the opportunist administrator, who desires to give practicable considerations too great weight when solving the vital problem of permanent forest production. 23. Quiz. What will future forest development depend upon? What is an important aim of research? Should preference be given regulation aims or the dictates of local business require- ments? Discuss permanent forest production and conservation. * Fisher, W. R. (Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 1910, pp. 285-286). Regulation Policy and Sustained Yield 19 Why do past methods of disposing of the public domain in the West make conserva- tive management difficult? What were early objections to the national forests? What is the matter with the lumber industry? How can it be improved by regulation? What are the solutions of national regulation of timber cutting? What does Kirkland suggest? Is it possible? Discuss sustained yield and the worker, the investor, the forest; taxation. Why cannot a sustained yield management be adapted at once on national forests? When is it claimed to be unnecessary? Summarize the sustained yield problem—advantages and limitations. How exact can an annual sustained yield be: (a) in France? (b) on our national forests? What are some of the difficulties in the United States? CHAP TER alt MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISIONS 24. Definition of and Size of Subdivisions. In order to intelligently sys- tematize the location of cuttings at the proper time, and in order to determine the area of forest to be cut over and volume of product to be removed the land must be suitably subdivided into practicable subdivisions which are defined as a larger or smaller part of a forest property segregated with a view to making units for purposes of administration, protection, organization, and management. The size of the subdivisions will depend on the intensiveness of management and administration. Where the conditions are intensive, as in New England woodlots, the size of subdivisions will obviously be much smaller than on the Pacific Coast. In New England the cordwood, poles, posts, or ties are usually marketed by the owner. ‘This is facilitated by estab- lished wagon roads. Thus if desired small tracts can be managed on a sustained yield basis under one working plan. On the Pacific Coast the conditions are essentially different because railroad marketing of saw logs demands a large area of timber so that the annual cut may be sufficient to maintain the investment. Still another factor—the progress of silviculture— enters into the problem. With virgin forests, management subdivisions will always be larger than where silviculture has been intensified. In the initial years of management there will be fewer distinctions in methods of cutting and in rotations. It stands to reason that the size of administrative sub- divisions will vary in like manner. The forest in Europe under the control of one man may be limited to 10,000 acres because of the detail incident to administration. The typical national forest of the Western United States today perhaps averages a third of a million acres and is as efficiently managed in a relative sense as is the 10,000 acre tract in Europe. There may be no thinnings, but few sales (and these are centralized), and no forestation; instead the manager’s time is centered on fire protection, grazing control and the broad problems of administration. It is important to grasp clearly the differences in the conditions which indicate intensive or extensive subdivi- sions, which are of two kinds: (1) Management and (2) Administrative. 25. Definition of Management Subdivisions. Management subdivisions aim at the orderly location of all data on forest resources so that this knowledge can be applied to all timber operations within the forest and the results recorded so as to preserve an accurate history of past cutting. These subdivisions are divided into working groups and working circles for the regulation of yield. Working group may be defined as an organization or working plan unit, com- prising an aggregate of compartments or stands to be managed under the same silvicultural system and rotation. (Syn: working block; working section; management class. G., Betriebsklasse. F., Serie D’Exploitation.) Working circle may be defined as an economic forest areca managed under one _ Management and Administrative Subdivisions 2I plan. It may or may not coincide with the administrative unit or with the working group. (Syn: working plan unit, working figure. G., Wirtschaftsganzes.) There appears to be more variation in the use of words for working-group and working circle than with other terms of current use in regulation. According to Schlich,* the working section (corresponding to working-group) is “a number of com- partments . . . . grouped together into cutting series, . . . . a number of the latter form a working section.” Moreover, according to the same author, “if a working circle” (our working circle) “consists of only one series of age classes, it is identical with a working section” (our working group). A working circle (our working circle) is, according to Schlich, an “area which is managed under the provisions of one and the same working plan.” Other terms have also been introduced. Recknagel** used in his first edition the term “working figure” for “that unit which is to be managed with the idea of a sustained yield.” He stated “But in America the unit of regulation, the working figure, must be the market unit.” To simplify the unit of regulation he omits the distinction between working group and working unit. Roth*** uses working section for group and does not distinguish working circle as a separate term. Fic. 2—Diagrammatic Sketch Map Illustrating the Distinction between Working Group and Working Circle (Syn., Working Unit). 26. Discussion of Management Subdivisions. The distinction between working group and working circle is illustrated by Fig. 2. Here is represented a central town, with established sawmills and asso- ciated industries, surrounded on the south by (A) agricultural land, on the * Schlich, Wm., Manual of Forestry, Vol. III, 1911, pp. 273-285. ** Recknagel, A. B., The Theory and Practice of Working Plans, 1913, p, 20, p. 33. *** Roth, Filibert, Forest Regulation (Vol. 1, Michigan Manual of Forestry, pp. 1-203). 22 American Forest Regulation west by a pure (E) Englemann spruce forest managed on an eighty-year rotation for paper pulp, on the north and north-east by a large watershed stocked with (W) western yellow pine, where clear cutting is followed by planting on a one hundred and twenty-year rotation. Directly to the north- east of the town is.a simple (C) coppice of scrub oak managed on a twenty- year rotation; further up on the mountain is a city watershed, held chiefly as (P) protection forest with natural regeneration. The rotation here is one hundred and fifty years, and the mixed conifer stand is cut over by light selection fellings on a cutting cycle of twenty-five years. In the case cited the local industries of the (T) town were entirely dependent upon a sustained yield from the combined watersheds. Under these circumstances a separate working group would be established for each of the four stands (E. C. W. P.) ; since these four stands are tributary to this one town, it would be entirely practicable to have one working circle include the four working groups. If, on the other hand, instead of four different stands with four different systems of management and varying rotations, the entire area had consisted of western yellow pine with a hundred and twenty-year rotation, followed by clear cutting and planting, but one working group would have been established, and this would have coincided exactly with the working circle; whereas under the conditions cited in Fig. 2, there are four working groups, because of varying types, silvicultural system and rotation, A further complication might have been introduced had the area (W) been so large that it could not have been conveniently handled under one working group. In such a case mere size might have dictated the formation of additional groups. It is therefore important to bear in mind that the working group is a smaller and narrower management (silvicultural) subdivision than the working circle. The working group is determined by type, silvicultural system, rotation or size, while the working circle would be determined more by transportation, market, and business and not by silviculture. Fernow naturally considers “working circle” the broader term, judging the aggregation of stands from the administrative yield and market point of view, and “working group” the narrower term, based mainly on silvicultural management as a unit. 27. Factors that Justify Formation of Working Groups. The formation of separate working groups may thus be dictated by the following factors: (1) forest type, (2) silvicultural system, (3) rotation, and (4) size of area. (1) Forest type. Types differ according to the kind of product yielded, silvicultural system of cutting and reproduction. They may demand a differ- ent rotation; therefore, whenever types cover such a large area or differ sharply in products yielded, rotation, method of cutting or reproduction, that they cannot be worked as one group for the regulation of the yield, it is necessary to establish different working groups. (2) Silvicultural system. Suppose that on one watershed there is clear cutting followed by planting, while on another the forest of yellow pine is managed by selection cutting; here separate working groups would be indi- cated. If these stands could be managed under the same silvicultural system, probably no distinction into two working groups need be made. Management and Administrative Subdivisions 23 (3) Rotation. Where two entirely different rotations are necessary, separ- ate working groups must be established. This is not always the case, how- ever, because in a mixed stand, frequently species with different rotations are managed under an average rotation in but one working group. But if the types were entirely separate with widely varying rotations, then different working groups would be essential. (4) Size of area. A single working group must have eventually, if it is clear cut, a complete series of age classes, and these age classes must be as small as is consistent with economy in logging, so as to reduce the danger from fire, windfall, fungus and insect damage. It is a fundamental maxim of silviculture that large even-aged stands endanger the forest; therefore with a very large working group, excessively large age classes could not be avoided if a clear cutting system were practised. Consequently, more than one working group might be necessary in order to reduce the size of the age classes. 28. Working Circles. The working circle (as contrasted with working group) is, in theory at least, dependent chiefly on the market, but under modern methods of rail transportation so typical of American lumbering, the market may not be the primary factor except in the case of small: local market units where rail transportation does not enter into the problem. Rail markets draw from a wide territory, and therefore a working circle may, under exceptional circumstances, be composed of several forests so far as the market is concerned, but restricted in size because of administrative or management grounds. Ideal conditions for a working circle, where a sus- tained yield is desired, consist of a complete market, complete transportation facilities of a permanent character, such as drivable streams, or a permanent system of forest roads. If temporary roads, railroads, or flumes must be built by the operator and paid for by him from the operation of cutting the timber, then these apparently unavoidable economic conditions make the attempt to regulate the annual cut more perplexing. In some cases it might mean that there was not enough timber locally to permit of a sustained yield until later rotations, and it must therefore be cut off rapidly in order to make a practical logging chance. An economic woods operation would be secured at the expense of the sustained yield—an objectionable feature. Under extensive conditions such as exist on the Pacific Coast, working circles are laid out in territory logically tributary to manufacturing centers by existing or possible transportation. This basis, under these conditions, fits in with the objective of a permanent industrial center and should have more weight than topographic or adminis- trative conditions, which are here of secondary importance. Another problem met with under extensive conditions is whether to take into consideration land under private ownership when establishing national forest working circles. The policy should unquestionably be to give due consideration to the private timber which will probably come into the market, since this will help to maintain the industrial center just as surely as the cutting of public stumpage. Allowance on the other hand must be made for timber land, which may be chiefly valuable for other purposes, since such areas will not contribute to the support of the economic working circle after the first crop of timber is removed. 24 ae American Forest Regulation 29. Policy of Small or Large Working Circles. Really effective regula- tion and a future sustained yield can best be obtained by securing reasonably small working circles (working plan units) today. Very large working circles, such as have been planned for some of our western forests, will pre- clude the possibility of moderate sized local sawmill industries, because if virgin stands are cut heavily on a watershed (with the idea of moving opera- tions to another watershed of the working circle later on), there will be no local merchantable timber for cutting after several decades. Where possible the plan advocated by Wolff* of having working circles coincide with natural main drainage areas is certainly logical, the intensification of administration, the fire danger, the bodies of overmature timber in immediate need of dis- posal and the sale of some of the less accessible timber are problems which can be adjusted and overcome. Small working circles will encourage per- manent local industries, stable labor conditions, more permanent improve- ments, diversification of sales, better silviculture and protection. It is “the safe conservative course”; and the development and maintenance of logging communities is certainly desirable. 30. Definitions of Block, Compartment and Lot. To build up suitable working groups and working circles it is convenient to first divide the forest area into smaller subdivisions in keeping with the intensiveness or extensive- ness of management. The smaller the division, the easier it will be in after years to segregate management data according to new and more intensive lines made necessary by a change in economic conditions. Since forest regulation is the arrangement of operations as to place, time and quantity, subdivisions are for the purpose of making convenient and possible the location of all operations, as follows: (1) On the ground, so that operations can be conveniently conducted in the forest. (2) In the office, in order that records may be systematized by tabula- tions or by means of maps or graphics; these essential records include (a) an inventory of estimates and (b) the record of future operations. In American forest regulation three subdivisions may be distinguished: (1) Block—A major division of the working circle, intermediate in size between the working circle and a compartment. A block is usually based on topography and comprises a main logging unit or group usually based on topog- raphy and comprises a main logging unit or group of logging units. A single block may contain many thousand acres. (2) Compartment—An organization unit or small artificial subdivision for purposes of location, administration, and silvicultural operation. (G., Abteil- ung, Jagen (Prussia). F. Parcelle.) (3) Lot—A small silvicultural subdivision of a compartment, differing in composition, age, or character, requiring different treatment from the main body of the compartment; temporary if due to accidental, permanent tf due to site conditions. (Synonyms: subcompartment. G., Unterabteilung, Abteilung (Prussia).) * Wolff, M. H. (Journal of Forestry, 1920, pp. 486-497). Management and Administrative Subdivisions 25 31. Discussion of Block, Compartment and Lot.* In figure 2 (P. W.C.) would probably form one block including the entire watershed but excluding the townsite (T). Area (P) would be divided into compartments a, b, c, d, and e, as indicated by dotted lines. The lots would probably not be necessary in a protection forest. (1) The boundaries of the block will ordinarily be topographic features such as watersheds, where the block would correspond to the logging unit rather than artificial subdivisions such as townships. The block should assist in the general location and classification of estimates and forest descriptions, but for larger areas than for compartments. Whether the topographic boundary will be a stream or ridge will depend on the local method of logging. If the block is based on natural logging units, the estimates will be convenient for small timber sales. If larger sales, comprising many thousands of acres, must be made because of market conditions, the estimates of a number of blocks can be conveniently grouped where each block corresponds to a logging unit. Care should be taken to clearly distinguish block and working group since the two may frequently coincide. The working circle may even be identical with the working group and block if the area under a sustained yield in a working plan happens to have the same boundaries as the group or block. (2) The compartment for some time to come will be the smallest perma- nent subdivision in the West with boundaries clearly marked. These bound- aries may be artificial survey lines (corresponding to the western section lines), rods, or preferably topographic features, such as ridge crests or streams. In our western mountains compartments are really small secondary logging units. The formation of compartment lines, especially in highly intensive man- agement should, if possible, conform to type, broad lines of quality and age classes. Where compartments can be made to include uniform quality, type or age, it is obviously an advantage to do so, but age, type or uniformity of stand cannot be the governing factor. In the United States, compartments in surveyed fairly level country will ordinarily be six hundred and forty acres, and in unsurveyed country considerably larger depending on the topog- raphy. The size must depend finally on the intensiveness of management. In New England the compartment may be less than one hundred acres. (3) The lot (often termed sub-compartment) is always a subdivision of a compartment, coinciding with distinct stands or descriptive unit. Since compartments cannot recognize differences in age or quality, the lot may be mapped and described separately if intensiveness of management justifies. Its boundaries are usually not permanently marked in the field but even under the extensive conditions existing in the Western United States, the lot may be justified in level country (except in mere protection working groups) because of the ease of recording intensive estimates by 4o-acre subdivisions. So far as practicable the compartment and not the lot should be the unit * The term lot, adopted by the S. A. F. Terminology Committee in preference to the English term sub-compartment, should not be confused with the local use of “lot” in New England and in government surveys in the West. 26 American Forest Regulation of description in extensive timber surveys. The separation into lots may be dictated by a change in quality and type, provided this will not necessitate dividing the forest into such small units as to be impracticable of description ; or age classes, if distinct enough to map. The lot as a silvicultural subdivi- sion without demarcated boundaries will always be of value as an intensive unit for timber surveys. In New England the lot may be separated in the forest. 32. Definition of Administrative Subdivisions. Administrative subdivi- sions are district, forest, ranger district or range, patrol district or beat. These are defined as follows: District—Generically, any administrative unit; specifically, an aggregate of administrative units or forests for control and inspection purposes. Forest—An administrative unit, as national forest, state forest, or phenieeal forest. Ranger District or Range—Part of a forest, an executive unit under care of a ranger. Patrol District or Beat—An executive unit for protective purposes, under a guard or patrol. Administrative subdivisions thus comprise the entire system of national forests, districts of forests, one forest, a ranger district within the forest or the beat for the guard within a ranger district. 33. Discussion of Administrative Subdivisions. Administrative subdivi- sions are made to facilitate administration rather than the regulation of yield and forest management. The entire system of national forests may be dis- tinguished from other public lands, or from forests managed under a separate bureau or department. For example, Indian forests, which are managed for the benefit of the Indians, may be segregated from national forests, or state forests. For convenience of administration these national forests have been divided into administrative districts* in order to facilitate the administrative control of the individual forests under supervisors. Each district is under the direction of a district forester assisted by a staff organization, divided in the United States according to lines of work, such as silviculture, operation, lands, and grazing. The forest is a distinct or connected unit or aggregation of units under a forest supervisor, who has immediate direction of the admin- istration** under the direction of the district office. The forest is divided into ranger districts, which are in charge of a district ranger. Where necessary to facilitate administration or protection, the ranger district may be divided into beats, each in charge of a guard. 34. Quiz. Define subdivision. What does the size of subdivisions depend upon? What kinds of subdivision are there? * For a discussion of administrative organization problems the student is referred to Forestry Quarterly, Vol. XIV, pp. 188-236, Forest Service Revenue and Organization, by T. S. Woolsey, Jr. ** Tt will be useful to give the student definite acreage figures on administrative sub- divisions for Western and Eastern conditions. | Management and Administrative Subdivisions 27 | ) What are management subdivisions? Define working group, and working circle. What is the distinction? When do working group and working circle coincide? What determines working groups? Discuss how working groups are affected by type, silvicultural system, rotation, size, market. What determines working circle? Define lot, compartment, and block. Discuss boundaries, size, value, and distinctions of each of these three units. How does block differ from working group? from working circle? When would they coincide? What effect will topography have on compartments and working circles in the West? What are administrative subdivisions? When would a guard’s beat correspond to a block and to a working group? CHAPTER IV ROTATIONS—TECHNICAL, SILVICULTURAL, AND ECONOMIC 35. Definitions of Rotation (and Felling Age). By rotation is meant the predetermined time or period during which it is intended to cut over a working group, the predetermined approximate felling age of the stands. Rotation refers to the forest as a whole and ts usually expressed not by a definite year, but to the nearest decade. Felling age refers to the actual age of the stand when cut. The length of rotations depend partly on the object of the owner and are also determined by technical, silvicultural, economic, or financial considera- tions as limited by silvicultural possibilities. According to Fernow a rotation is “the time through which the crop is allowed to grow normally until cut and reproduced.” The view-point in India, as expressed by D’Arcy,* is contrary to the European conception of rotation (except in selection forests in France), MaMmMelive saa Gs ara the exploitable age of a forest crop is the age at which the individual trees furnish the kind of produce most wanted.” According to Endres,** “By rotation period or rotation is meant that time which elapses, under normal con- ditions, between the planting and the utilization of a stand. In the case of the working group the rotation is the average time of growing merchantable material which is the fundamental consideration in working plan calculations.” Variations from the normal may be due to unusual silvicultural, financial or economic conditions. 36. Not to be Confused with Cutting Cycle. Rotation is not to be con- fused with cutting-cycle in selection forests, which is the period elapsing between cuts on the same area. Obviously in selection forests the length of the cutting cycle has an important bearing on the amount removed, and the frequency of cut also has a direct bearing on the amount that is lost through decay; consequently, there is a tendency with intensive management to short cutting cycles of from five to eighteen years. With extensive man- agement longer cutting cycles are at present unavoidable. In Oregon western yellow pine a cutting cycle of 50 to 60 years has been tentatively adopted; this will be decreased when the market and permanent transportation is established. A cutting cycle of 100 years for western yellow pine in Arizona certainly must be reduced as soon as possible. In France*** under most intensive conditions the cutting cycle is five to eight years; under less intensive conditions, nine to eighteen years, and rarely more than this. The *D’Arcy, W. E., Preparation of Forest Working Plans in India, Calcutta, 1898, 3d Edition. ** Endres, pp. 220-221. *** Woolsey, T. S., Jr., Studies in French Forestry, Chapter IX, John Wiley and Sons, 1920. Rotations—Technical, Silvicultural, and Economic 29 cutting cycle* is usually a sub-multiple of the rotation; obviously the longer the cutting cycle, the greater the cut. 37. Conception of Length of Rotation. The tendency is to have too narrow an idea of what length of rotation means: for example, if five-year-old transplants are used for a plantation (after clear cutting) which is allowed to grow one hundred years, the rotation in this case would. be one hundred years (the length of time the forest soil is used) and not one hundred and five, the felling age, that is the age of the trees, since the time the transplants were in the nursery would be omitted in the calculation of the rotation. Yet it is of course recognized that the length of the rotation is shortened by the use of well formed transplants simply because the stand matures sooner. Similarly frequent and early thinnings are of the utmost importance in reducing the necessary rotation because with thinnings the stand will mature earlier than if left unthinned. Efficient thinnings not only enable the forester to grow timber of a specified size in fewer years, but they increase seed production and promote earlier seed crops; they decrease the date of the culmination of mean annual growth, and, as Endres puts it, “The greatest benefit is felt where the highest soil rent is maintained . ... It is recalled that large, early yields produce large soil rent and vice versa. . . . A stand 6699 that has been thinned up to the “n” year will have higher value than one that has not been thinned.” It must be born in mind that while the forest as a whole may be managed according to specified rotations yet individual stands may be cut before or after the rotation age because of accidents, market conditions, etc. Still another point, worthy of emphasis, is that it is usually sufficient if the rotation can be established to the nearest decade; it is splitting hairs to figure to the exact year when computing the rotation. Biolley in a recent treatise cautions against placing too much stress on age in considering rotations. “ . they persist in confusing the age and the size of trees... . The age or time is only one of the factors of the result sought for (and not the principal one) The other factors are: the suitable role for each tree . . . . and especially the “savoir-faire” of the silviculturalist, the quality of treatment by means of which he utilizes and improves these factors .... The result sought for can only be production. The age is only an accessory.” What Biolley** wants is really a flexible rotation to be modified by the silvi- culturalist so as to give the best possible production according to the demands of each group of trees, site, or local conditions of stand. “The Gurnaud rr consists above all in experimenting with the treatment........ 1 Such ideas are based on too intensive a treatment to be applicable for the United States, and it may often be unwise to give the officer in charge of a forest too much leeway. Regulation implies systematized control. * Refer to the discussion of cutting cycles in “Studies in French Forestry,” already cited, pp. 226-228; also see chapter X, Part II of this volume for a more detailed dis- cussion of cutting cycles. ** L’Aménagement des Forets par la Méthode Expérimentale at Spécéalement La Méthode du Controle. Attinger Fréres, Paris, par H. E. Biolley, 1920, p. 15. 30 American Forest Regulation According to Blascheck,* in India economic conditions necessitate an annual felling area; an average tree best suited to the objects of the manage- ment; sufficiently heavy fellings to insure regeneration; and, of less impor- | tance, a felling cycle which shall be a sub-multiple of the rotation. 38. Basic Policy for Rotations. One of the chief difficulties in computing rotations (and especially financial rotations) is that the forester must use present statistics or the trend of present statistics for calculations which pretend to answer management problems on the basis of unknown or roughly approximated conditions a half century or a century hence—obviously impos- sible to fathom. But the proper regulation viewpoint is that the problem should be solved for the present on the basis of the best available present data with the assumption that when the working plan is systematically revised, these calculations will be recomputed and brought up to date. The fact that a revised and altered answer to the rotation problem will be certain is no reason for not doing our best with available statistics. As a matter of policy it is often safe to also estimate future conditions, based on the trend of economic conditions, rather than to follow blindly present stumpage prices, present cost values, present current interest rates and market require- ments for forest products. The best regulation implies some attempt at fathoming the future. We know from past history that forest conditions will change; therefore to follow blindly present conditions, we will arrive at the least accurate predictions. There is a via media between following today’s data on the one hand and on the other of making unwarranted guesses at the future. Moreover we must realize that our calculations are at best approximations and therefore the minutiae may often be omitted with profit and propriety. American foresters, in striving for details, are apt to lose sight of the goal. 39. Mean Rotations for an Entire Stand. The forester must (in theory) distinguish in intensive regulation (as for example in parts of New England) between the rotation for a particular stand and the rotation for a working group which is‘composed of a number of stands of varying quality, but in the West (in Northern Arizona for example) a rough general average rota- tion for portions of an entire region, will usually be a sufficiently close approx- imation for conditions prevalent while National Forests are being organized. Even in a selection forest such as Chamonix the French prescribe one tech- nical rotation for Norway spruce and larch based on a rough proportion of the length of time it takes to grow the two species, and weighted according to the aggregate volume present. This rightly emphasized the futility of minute mathematical calculations for the solution of a problem which only demands an approximate answer. 40. Kinds of Rotations. The following kinds of rotations are of value in the United States and are listed in the order of extensiveness: (1) Technical, maximum of material for a certain purpose and size. (2) Silvicultural, based on limitations of species to reproduce or to resist decay. * Blascheck, A. D., “The True Selection System” (Indian Forester, 1913, pp. 427-430). Rotations—Technical, Silvicultural, and Economic 31 (3) Economic, maximum average volume production gauged by culmina- tion of mean annual growth of stands. (4) Financial, divided into: a. Maximum forest rent or highest mean annual net money income (disregarding interest). b. Maximum soil rent or highest returns per dollar invested (with compound interest). 41. Definition and Discussion of Technical Rotations. Technical rotations attempt to produce the maximum of material suitable for a certain purpose and of a given size, such as railroad ties, mine-timbers, or saw-logs. Technical rotations in the United States are of more than mere historical interest. A technical rotation, especially under conditions existing today in the West, might give the correct answer. Take the case of a watershed which is most suitable for producing railroad ties, because railroad ties alone could be floated down a drivable stream, the sole means of transport; here a technical rotation based on the length of time it took to grow ties of given dimensions, is clearly indicated. The exact length, in this case, would depend on the most suitable period for growing the quality of tie which yielded the largest net return on the investment, not taking into consideration com- pound interest charges* unless the data for financial calculations were available. 7 In French Government selection forests technical rotations are usually chosen so as to produce the kind of material most in demand by the public, and to support local industries vital to the economic life of the locality. This kind of rotation, under the conditions existing in the Vosges, Jura, or Alps, where large sized saw logs are required, has been severely criticised by certain German foresters because of the financial losses usually involved; but with public forests it is usually better policy to put national needs above narrow conceptions of financial gain; so it is held that for National Forests the French policy is fully justified. A somewhat broader German viewpoint, as expressed by Endres,* is as follows: “Were we to apply the technical rotations to even-aged high forests, producing mainly large timber, great financial losses would take place. However the policy of bringing about a mixture of species in order to meet market requirements or demands is apparently correct... . It is in keeping with sound forestry because it also main- tains soil fertility . . . . The technical rotation may also be used by the state for social and political reasons . . . . but the technical rotation can only be recognized when production costs . . . . are of no consequence to the owner.” 42. Illustrations of Technical Rotations. One of the earliest examples of technical rotations, for use on national forests, is that for western yellow pine, established in 1909. According to Woolsey,** “If only timber of the lower grades is produced, export shipments will suffer. It is therefore particularly essential, on account of the long hauls and consequent heavy freight rates, that a fair proportion of higher grades be supplied ... . The best rotation cannot be predicted until after regulated cutting .... Tentatively, a rotation of 200 years is recommended.” * Korstian, C. F., Manuscript Report, files of Forest Service, District III. ** Woolsey, T. S., Jr., Western Yellow Pine in Arizona and New Mexico (Forest Service Bulletin 101, 1910, pp. 48-51-52). 32 American Forest Regulation Overmature stands of this species are from 250 to 400 years in age. At 200 years the average tree is about 21 inches in diameter and it is argued: “All available figures indicate that it will take 200 years to grow saw timber. It will be seen . . . . that diameter growth begins to fall off at from 100 to 160 years, and that height growth declines from the mean annual from 170 years. .. . . this is cer- tainly the minimum size (21 inches) that can be estimated to yield timber of fair quality that will justify shipment. With thrifty, well thinned stands, however, it is hoped the growth will be greater.” Obviously such a long rotation will be reduced with more intensive conditions, but even an author, such as Schlich, agrees that with extensive conditions and slow growth maximum rotations prevail. The rotation in question was preliminary in character, and merely facilitated the use of rough formulae methods of regulating the annual cut, advisable at that time, crude though they may have been. Judging from Table 19 of the Bulletin,* on the basis of maximum mean annual growth a rotation of but 70 years might have been indicated, obviously impracticable, under the conditions enumerated. As a contrast to the preliminary technical rotation of 200 years for the production of western yellow pine saw logs, the following specific rotation problem arose on the Pecos National Forest in Northern New Mexico and is instructive: The** rotation and cutting cycle will be adopted which will yield the product having the highest monetary stumpage value, involving a combined technical and financial rotation.” It was found that the greater the per cent of hewn ties in the final cut, the greater the stumpage value. Consequently, a rotation to produce this result was recommended and the problem was to find out from growth studies the size when western yellow pine (and other local species) produced the largest number of the most profitable sized ties. It was found that 14 and 15 inch trees were the optimum tie trees, because “trees less than 14 inches yield no square ties and no firsts.’ There was a wider margin of profit on the firsts than on the seconds. With this data as a basis the rotation estab- lished was the approximate number of years it takes to grow a western yellow pine tree 14 inches in diameter breast high—in this case 120 years. An average rotation was established on the basis of the dominant species, since it was considered impracti- cable to have separate rotation for different trees. The conclusion was also reached (as was to be expected) that “the shorter the rotation, the freer will be the forest from disease.” (See also Silvicultural Rotations.) The factor of the size and quality of boards in the determination of rotation must be considered. For example, in the case of loblolly pine, 20 to 30 years would be a suffi- cient rotation, if round-edged box boards are desired; 35 to 40 years if part of the product must be a fair grade lumber; and 50 to 100 years if a considerable per cent of lumber of the best grade is to be produced.*** Short technical rotations may be chosen for the production of cordwood, mine props, pulpwood, fence posts, telephone poles, box boards, and such classes of product which can be grown in less time than can large sawtimber. 43. Definition and Discussion of Silvicultural Rotations. Silvicultwral* rotations are based on the limitations of the species to reproduce or to resist decay. If a species produces seed prolifically between seventy and one hundred years of age, and regeneration must be by natural means, it would be logical * Woolsey, T. S., Jr.. Western Yellow Pine in Arizona and New Mexico (Forest Service Bulletin 101, 1910, pp. 48-51-52). This rotation of 200 years has been confirmed by recent investigations. **Korstian, C. F.. Hewn Tie Versus Saw Timber Rotations ((P. S. A. F. Vol. XI, 1916, p. 315). *** Ashe, W. W., Forest Management of Loblolly Pine, 1914. *Termed physical rotations by William Schlich in his Manual of Forestry, Vol. III, IQII, pp. 200-201. Rotations—T echnical, Silvicultural, and Economic 33 to limit the rotation to within those periods. In sprout forests a silvicultural limitation to the rotation chosen would be imposed by the limit of power to sprout. Incase the coppice failed to sprout after it reached an age of seventy years and the treatment had to be simple coppice, naturally the forest would suffer, if a rotation of over seventy years were chosen. In this case silvicul- tural factors would be an absolute bar to a longer rotation. According to Endres* “Some believe it to mean the rotation which would leave the stand with complete reproduction.** With high forest (that time) was when the seed production was largest and when the soil was most receptive. With coppice it was within the sprouting limits of the stumps . . . . Others believed the rotation to mean the time when the stand is silviculturally mature or when the growth stopped.” As a matter of fact if the rotation is an economic or financial one this factor of loss from rot will usually be eliminated because any intensive rota- tion (economic or financial) will fall before rot is a menace. The danger from rot, however, must be carefully considered when high quality saw timber is grown under a technical rotation or where the rotation is lengthened in protection forests. There is also the limit placed by decay, but strictly silvicultural rotations are of little real*** importance unless considered in connection with other kinds of rotations. Silvical requirements for reproduction or to avoid decay or other losses must perforce limit all rotations but rarely are the sole deter- mining factor. 44. Illustrations of Silvicultural Rotation Limits. As Meineike* points out: “If a species such as white fir shows an increasing amount of defect after eighty years, a rotation should certainly not be chosen that would necessitate holding stands beyond this period; to do so would court unnecessary loss through decay.” This factor of rot will be found to set a limit to the feasible rotation for other species. With western yellow pine Long** found, “that during the blackjack period (up to 180 years) the trees are practically free from this rot” (western red-rot) . . . . “while trees over 200 years old show a much higher percentage of rot than the younger trees (blackjack) . . .. It is a fundamental fact that the older a tree is, the more liable it is to be attacked by heart-rotting fungi.” The following table by Zon*** furnishes another excellent illustration of a combined technical and silvicultural rotation: * Endres, p. 244. ** Roth, Filibert, in his Forest Regulation terms this a physical rotation. He also mentions a natural rotation which “is the natural life of the species, which hardly deserves separate nomenclature or description.” *** Recknagel, A. B., in The Theory and Practice of Working Plans, 1913, New York, Pp. 39-40, mentions also a latent rotation which hardly deserves the term rotation; he defines it as “just double the average age of the working figure’ (working group). * Meineike, E. P., “Forest Pathology and Forest Regulation’ (Forest Service Bulletin 275, 1916). ** Long, W. H., A Preliminary Report on the Occurrence of Western Red-Rot in Pines Ponderosa (Plant Industry Bulletin 490, 1917, pp. 7-8). The term pathological rotation seems superfluous. *** Zon, R., “Chestnut in Southern Maryland” (Forest Service Bulletin No. 53, 1904. D. 3)e 34 American Forest Regulation Trees from seed Coppice Kind of product (age years) (age years) Post 27 14 Tie 4I 29 Pole 49 38 Rail 54 43 According to Zon, “Chestnut (sprout) is not suited to the production of large timber on account of its unsoundness and short clear length when it has reached the desired size. Therefore even if large timber is desirable, chestnut should not stand longer than seventy to eighty years, and coppice will then fill requirements better. Only in exceptional cases, : . should chestnut be left standing ninety years or more.” According to the above table, if the main product is chestnut ties, the rotation, for trees grown from seed, must be at least forty years; but if coppice, only thirty years. With sprout reproduction, as has been explained, the forester cannot delay cutting until the sprouts are no longer vigorous. Therefore, mean maximum ages can be established, beyond which it would be dangerous to hold sprout stands. For chestnut (prior to the chestnut blight) this maximum age was approximately 75 years; for chestnut oak, 45; for other oaks, 25 to 35 years. As to choice of material, whether cord wood, lumber, ties or poles, it is simply a local problem which must be worked out according to the conditions of haul and stumpage prices. According to the growth studies made by Frothingham,* the average annual growth culminated for chestnut on sites I and 2 at 35 years; on site 3, at 40 years; for chestnut oak on sites 3, at 40 years. The general conclusion was reached that for ordinary hard wood sprouts in Connecticut a rotation from 30 to 40 years was advisable, but that (prior to the chestnut blight) chestnut sprouts may be held up to 75 years if lumber is to be produced. This shows the correct application of this technical phase (in connection with other factors) before the decision is reached as to the rotation period. : 45. Definition and Discussion of Economic or Quantitative Rotations. Economic (or quantitative) aotations attempt to secure the maximum average volume production per acre and are based on the culmination of the mean annual growth read from yield tables, and not on the maximum growth of individual trees. The point in the yield table, where the mean annual growth** culminates, indicates the economic rotation. This point is readily determined after it has once been established what part of the tree is to be included as volume. Expressed as a simple formula it is as follows: Final yield + intermediate yield + number of years. In the United States when the board foot unit is used this culmination of mean annual growth will vary, (1) according to the log rule used, (2) depending on the utilization standards, especially as regards top cutting limits, and (3) according to the class of material which is included in the computations of volume. Because of these complications it is desirable when practicable to use other units, such as the cubic foot. (1) Effect of Log Rule. With a log rule which gives large volumes for small sized trees, the tendency would be to shorten the rotation because with such a rule the mean annual growth would culminate earlier. With a rule * Frothingham, E. H., Second Growth Hard Woods in Connecticut (Forest Service Bulletin, 1912, p. 45). ** See Forest Mensuration, H. H. Chapman, for the curves of current annual and mean annual growth. Rotations—Technical, Silvicultural, and Economic 35 that put proportionately small values on small logs and too generous volumes on large logs, the culmination (other factors being equal) of mean annual growth would be retarded and consequently the rotation would be lengthened. (2) Utilization Standards. The smaller the top cutting limit, the shorter would be the indicated economic rotation because with a larger top cutting limit a longer time must elapse before an appreciable proportion of the tree is merchantable. (3) Class of Product. If small sized ties are the most desired product, it clearly follows from (2) that the economic rotation will always be shorter than if a larger class of product must be marketed. The culmination of the mean annual growth of small ties (even if expressed in the common factor of board feet) will be earlier than if the culmination in board feet is computed on the basis of saw logs. This is a phase which is also present in technical rotations. According to Munger,* “It is the policy of the Federal Government to administer the public forest lands in such a way as to perpetuate as forest all the land which is better suited to the produc- tion of timber than anything else, and to make it yield for all time the greatest quantity and the best quality of timber.” 46. Choice of Economic Rotation with Illustrations. The most satisfac- tory basis for a choice of economic rotation is the total production of material according to a specified unit of product, such as board feet, for a specified size of sawtimber, cubic feet (or cords) for pulp wood, linear feet of converter poles with a top limit specified, or cords of fuel. Where, as usually happens, the product from the ripe tree must be in three classes, such as board feet, ties and cordwood, the gauge of quantity must be expressed in a common unit which can serve as a basis for the comparison of the standard volume at different ages; otherwise three different quantitative rotations might be indicated, which is impracticable because three classes of product are derived from one and the same tree. In such a case often the most logical procedure is simply to adopt a financial rotation (see Chapter V) since then the common unit of comparison will be the dollar. Endres shows that the culmina- tion of the mean annual growth is earliest on the richest soils and it is well to bear in mind that, “The rotations on the better sites are often shorter than financial rotations for unthinned high forests where the market conditions are bad.” According to European yield tables** the economic rotations are approximately as follows: Soil quality Pine (Schwappach) Spruce (Baur) Fir (Schuberg) Beech (Schuberg) —Age in years when mean annual growth culminates— ] 35 50 55 70-75 II 40-45 60-70 60-65* 80-85 III 50-60 70-80 70-75 85-95 IV 75-80 60-80 85-00 95-100 Wie cat Ny IES iad 5 onl lig arial Li rt 95-105 100-110 * Munger, Thornton T., Western Yellow Pine in Oregon (Forest Service Bulletin, 418, 1917, p. 36). ** Endres, p. 245. 36 American Forest Regulation The above figures, however, only serve to illustrate that the rotation which produces the largest amount of wood is not necessarily the best, except perhaps in localities in which coal is scarce and transportation very poor. As Endres puts it, “In the present age of commercialism, it is no longer a case of the greatest volume but of the highest money return for the best product that is the controlling factor in fixing the rotation.” Whether this will apply to American conditions is a question. If there is a national timber shortage, it would be easy to justify rotations that would produce the greatest quantity of product required by the nation. Illustrations of economic rotations. The Forest Service (District 1) determined that “The maximum yield for (western) white pine under average conditions occurs at 120 years and the rotation has been fixed accordingly. In the case of lodgepole pine, however, another consideration enters into the problem. It has been determined that at the age of growth culmination the trees are too small to supply the local demand. Hence, a longer rotation than indicated upon a straight yield basis has been established.” This determination of the rotation of lodgepole pine is of interest because the rota- tion could not be established solely on the basis of maximum mean annual growth, since at that time sufficient merchantable material would not be produced. The objects of management in this case were not only watershed protection but also a maximum sustained yield for merchantable timber of the most desirable sizes. According to Mason* “The length of the rotation . . . . is determined by the rate of growth... . and the purpose for which the wood is to be used. Because of the slow growth of lodge- pole pine and the necessity of raising large sized ties, a longer rotation must be chosen than would be indicated by the culmination of mean annual growth at 70 to 90 years on different soil qualities. A rotation of this length, however, gives few trees 9 inches or more in diameter and is, therefore, too short.” If the material was cut to 6 inches in the top, the board foot mean annual growth culminated at 130 years, while if cut to 8 inches in the top, the culmination is delayed to from 200 to 210 years. At 130 years only 26 of the material produced is 8 inches or more in diameter at the top end, while at 200 years nearly 9/10 of the material produced is merchantable. The author therefore concludes that, “The mean annual growth in board feet to a 6 inch top is nearly at its maximum at 140 years, when 53 per cent of the scale material is 8 inches or more in top diameter re 4 Such a rotation is the best for normally stocked lodgepole stands on average sites in Montana.” This is a sound method of analysis, but with thinnings the limitation as to size would probably be largely done away with because there would be fewer trees but with a larger size in the top. There is no objection to basing the economic rotation on the culmination of mean annual growth taking into account only trees of the most desirable size. In a quality I second growth white pine** stand, at 55 years of age the mean annual growth is 1000 board feet; at 60 years it has risen to 1003 board feet and at 65 it is 1002. In this case the quantitative rotation for first quality soil would be sixty years if based on the board foot yield. For the same quality of soil in this table, but for cubic feet, it will be noted that the culmination is at fifty-five years. A still different culmination of mean annual growth would have occurred if the board feet had been computed by a different log rule or with different cutting limits in the type or different standards of utilization. It is therefore evident that in determining a quantitative rota- * Mason, D. T., Utilization and Management of Lodgepole Pine in the Rock Moun- tains (Forest Service Bulletin 234, 1915, 22-3. Special reference is made to table 12, Dp: 22): ** Reference is made to table 7, page 24, in White Pine Under Forest Management, by E. H. Frothingham (Forest Service Bulletin 13, 1914). Rotations—Technical, Silvicultural, and Economic a4 tion it is necessary to give the exact data upon which it is based. Quantitative rotations are never based upon current growth. According to the Forest Service (District 6), “In the Douglas fir region we are now operating on a tentative rotation of 100 years. Our overstock, however, is so large that we are not very vitally concerned at, present with the length of rotation . ... In the yellow pine region we have assumed a rotation of 180 years with a cutting cycle of 60... . . Until we have more specific data as to the rate of growth after cuttings (making allowance for increased growth, normal loss, etc.) and know more about the silviculturally most desirable method of cutting, I don’t see how we can arrive at the ideal rotation and cutting cycle.” Hawley’s* conclusions (basis not given but probably economic) as to the proper rotations for intensive forestry around New Haven were as follows: Hardwood type 60-80 years Hemlock type 80-100 years Pine type 50 years These conclusions are obviously tentative. According to Chapman’s investigations** Ashley County, Arkansas, the shortleaf pine cut on an economic rotation should be grown in 100 to IIo years; probably in the majority of cases the rotation indicated by this local study will be less rather than more. No mention was made by*** Graves of rotation, but after showing that trees were merchantable for pulp down to five or six inches inside bark on the stump, he analysed the diameter limit of cutting. He showed that if spruce trees were cut to six inches there would be 75 years between cuts of equal size; if to 8 inches, 50 years; while if cut to 10, 12 or a 14 inch limit, there would be a correspondingly shorter interval between equal cuts. He selected 10 inches in this case as the diameter limit because . “The owners wished to obtain the greatest possible immediate return without seri- ously impairing the productive capacity of the forest and are willing to wait for a longer period for a second cut.” Such a diameter limit corresponds roughly to a rotation of 165 years. This has the character of an economic rotation, but the fallacy and danger of using any diameter limit in irregular stands must be recognized. The Norway pine mean annual growth culminated at 130 years, curiously enough on all sites. This is probably due to errors in growth data since ordinarily the poorer the soil the later the* culmination of mean annual growth and hence the longer the economic rotation. According to Mattoon,** rotations depend largely on (1) The age when the mean annual growth is greatest, (2) The kind of material desired, and (3) The total cost of producing the material. Such a conception involves an economic rotation, a technical rotation and a financial rotation, but this same writer concluded that the most reliable basis is the time when the mean annual production is greatest (i.e., economic rotation). For short leaf pine Mattoon concluded that the economic rotation for site II stands in North Carolina * Hawley, Ralph C., A Working Plan for the Woodlands of the New Haven Water Company (Yale Forest School Bulletin 3, 1913, p. 25). ** Chapman, H. H., Prolonging the Cut of Southern Pine (Yale School of Forestry, Bulletin 2, 1913, p. 8). *** Graves, H.-S., Practical Forestry in the Adirondacks (Bureau of Forestry, Bulletin 1899, p. 64). * Woolsey, T. S, Jr., and Chapman, H. H., Norway Pine in the Lake States (Forest Service Bulletin 139, 1914, p. 26). ** Mattoon, W. R., Short Leaf Pine, Its Economical Importance, and Forest Manage- ment (Forest Service Bulletin 308, 1915, p. 32). 38 American Forest Regulation | was 90 years; for sites in Arkansas, 100 years, but for New Jersey, 45 to 50 years.’ This is for sawtimber. If the mean annual growth culmination is based on total volume, © without consideration of size, then the culmination comes 20 to 30 years earlier than when sawtimber must be produced; on site I, at 50 to 60 years, on site II, at 60 to 75 years, on site III, at 85 years. These rotations would be decreased by 15 to 30 years, with early and frequent thinnings. The specific rotation recommended for conditions on the Arkansas National Forest, where the aim was “to produce the sort of material most needed by the people, which is mostly medium sized sawtimber,” is 90 years, which will produce an average tree of 15.9 diameter containing 240 board feet. 47. Quiz. What is a rotation? Explain cutting cycle. What affects the length of rotation? Should the rotation be based on present statistics or on possible future changes? Discuss intensive and extensive rotations. Define technical, silvicultural, economic rotations. What kinds of financial rotations are there? (see chapter V). How do economic rotations differ from those based on the forest rent theory? Illustrate when technical rotations are advisable. Is this kind of rotation best suited to public or private management? Why do technical rotations sometimes entail financial losses? Is it safe to base the decision as to the length of rotation purely on technical grounds? Illustrate a silvicultural rotation? Is this a safe basis upon which to base a REMY ss How are economic rotations established. ; How is it affected by log rule, utilization or class of material harvested? Would an economic rotation for pulpwood closely agree with the best financial rota- tion (forest rent)? financial rotation (soil rent)? (see chapter V). Discuss and comment upon the economic rotations for various species and show how these will be modified in the future. CHAPTER V FINANCIAL ROTATIONS 48. Definition of Financial Rotations and Related Subjects. Before defin- ing financial rotations let us repeat the definition for forest rent and soil rent. Forest rent is the net income from a forest organized for sustained yield with- out interest charges on the forest capital,—bookkeeper’s- balance,—the forest, 4.e., soil with a stand or growing stock, being conceived as the forest capital, and the rent as the total interest earned thereon. (G., Waldrente.) Soil rent is.that part of the income (or balance) from a managed forest which remains as interest on the soil capital alone after all expenses with compound interest have been deducted, the soil alone being conceived as the capital. (G., Bodenrente.) Our definition then is: Financial rotations aim at securing the highest monetary return. This rotation will vary depending on whether the return is figured on the basis of forest rent or soi rent. Financial rotations introduce considerations of cost and attempt at securing either the maximum forest rent or maximum soil rent. The maximum forest rent rotation is that which yields the highest net mean annual net money return without compound interest; the maximum soil rent rotation is that which yields the highest return (at compound interest) per dollar invested.* * Before discussing financial rotations let us bear in mind the definitions for capital and value in their various phases (As explained in the preface, the terms and definitions follow the form adopted by the S. of A. F., see J. of F., Vol. XV, 1917, pp. 68-101): This factor of production in the forestry business is variously figured according to what parts of the investment are referred to and what basis of valuation is applied. Fixed capital refers to such kinds of capital as are not used up in production, like the soil. Working or operating capital refers to money capital needed to supply current expenses in operating a forest. Soil capital refers to the value of the soil figured in various ways. Stock capital refers to the value represented by the wood material of all stands com- prising a forest or working circle. Forest capital refers to soil capital and stock capital combined. Base capital may be used following the precedent of Pressler in his index per cent for the combined soil and working capital. The capitals may be based upon various kinds of values, and to secure a definite meaning, the term must be qualified by the method by which its value was determined. The following values may be differentiated: Investment value—the purchase price or the actual,expenditures or investments that have been made in acquiring or creating the property with interest, less incomes actually derived from it, with interest. (G., kostenwert). Sale or exchange value—the market price based on statistics of actual sales: a special kind of sale value is the forced sale or wrecking value that can be obtained by exploita- tion of saleable parts (see stumpage value) (G., verkaufswert; F., valeur venale). 40 American Forest Regulation 49. (A) Rotations for Maximum Forest Rent or Highest Mean Annual Net Money Return. This form of rotation is exactly similar to the economic (or quantitative) rotation except that the yield unit is expressed in money with the costs of operation deducted—a common standard of comparison. The cost of establishing the stand is deducted so that the net mean annual per acre income can be figured for each decade. The decade with the largest mean annual return is the forest rent rotation indicated. This is a more intensive form of rotation than the economic (or quantitative) already described but less intensive than a financial rotation based on the soil rent theory described later, where the costs are figured at a definite rate of com- pound interest and all costs and returns discounted to a definite date so as to have a uniform basis for comparison. The forest rent formula is as follows: (Final and intermediate returns) — (expenditures), number of years (F$-++ I$) — (C$ + Ar8). N or using the terms listed, 50. Illustrations of Maximum Forest Rent. As yet there are few examples in Ameri- can forestry of rotations for the highest mean annual net money return. The following table is from Endres*: TABLE 2. Synopsis of gross returns, expenditures, and mean annual net returns in dollars per acre for a fully stocked quality III spruce stand. | i \| | eka Gross Returns | Hen tes nee | Current | Mean, years || Final ee Total | Planting Sapien Total 1 Returns | ratharte || Pere 30 ~—*|| $ 48.30| $ —.— | $ 48.30 || $8.00 | $18.00 | $26.00 || $ 22.30 || 3 5-89 $0.74 40 | 109.10 4.10] 113.20 8.00 24.00 32.00 81.20 | 8.12 || 2.03 50 188.00 12.40] 203.40 | 8.00 30.00 38.00 || 162.40 7-78 || 3.25 60 259.00 25.20| 284.20 | 8.00 36.00 44.00 || 240.20 9-31 || 4.00 70 | 345.30 38.00] 383.30 || 8.00 42.00 50.00 333.30 || 11.27 | 4.76 80 || 45r00 51.00| 502.00 || 8.00 48.00 56.00 || 446.00 11.08 || 5.58 go | 554.20 64.60| 618.80 | 8.00 54.00 62.00 || 556.80 II.g2 | 6.19 100 =||_—~666.20 77.80] 744.00 8.00 60.00 68.00 676.00 9.82 || 6.76 110 759.40 88.80] 848.20 8.00 66.00 74.00 || 774.20 6.58 || 7.04 120 | 821,80 98.20] 920.00 8.00 72.00 80.00 || 840.00 1/4960 {n the preceding table the maximum forest rent (mean annual) falls at 110 years when it amounts to $7.04 per acre per year. The maximum current income comes between 90 and 100 years. Stock or stumpage value—based on sale value of material ready for immediate utili- zation (Synonym, utilization value) (G., nutzungswert). Expectancy value—the present worth of all estimated or expected future net earnings (discounted to the present); the capitalized net income value (G., erwartungswert; F., valeur d’attente). Rent or yield value—a value, determined by capitalizing, with a demanded rate of interest, the yearly or intermittent net return possible to be derived from a managed property. (See forest rent and soil rent) (G., bodenrentierungswert, waldrentierungs- wert). * This table was taken from Endres, Lehrbuch der Waldwertrechnung und Forst- stative, page 233. Marks per hectare were reduced to dollars per acre by dividing by 10. The yield was calculated for spruce, quality 3. This table has been used in slightly different form by other American writers. Financial Rotations 41 _ Endres* gives another method of figuring what he terms “value increase per cent which is virtually growth per cent expressed in money with expenditures deducted. His calculations are as follows: Value per cent at 110 years =1© (1 . $88.80 — $8.00 = 1.006% II0 $759.40 Val t at I —100_ $77.80 — $8.00 a alue per cent at 100 years =H (1 Wt ISGR BIBER? ). 41.105 %, “The stand is therefore not ready for cutting because 1.105 is greater than 1.006,” as held by the above mentioned author. Value per cent at 120 years = 100 (1+ SOB = 88.00) = 905%. Here, “The stand has passed the cutting period because .925 is less than 1.006.” This formula may be expressed as follows: 100 Pree er ine yields — planting costs) final yield This is a formula of technical interest but its use would not be necessary because the rotation is more readily determined by a direct computation of the net mean annual returns for different rotations. Where true per cents are calculated, other factors must enter in. Value per cent = - ; rotation 51. Distinction Between Forest Rent and Soil Rent with Illustrations. The distinction between forest rent and soil rent rests on the difference between income per acre without interest and income per dollar invested with compound interest. This difference is thus discussed by Endres: “The manner in which interest accumulates is shown in the following table, figured on a beech high forest (with interest at only 2%): Rotationsoz ain.0e. a0. : 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 I10 120 years Horestrent 2 St20.01. 28. $0.74 2.03 3.25 4.00 4.76 5.58 6.19. 6.76 7.04 7.00 SAUMSREIIE ceeret ts lores s.0 6s $0.23 1.00 1.56 1.75 1.89 “1.98 ‘1.95 1.88 1.71 1.47 Interest on capital .... $0.51 :'F.03' 1:69 2.25 ° 2!88.3.60 4.24 4.88 5.33 5.53 “In a beech high forest the largest mean annual forest rent per acre gave a total of $7.04 at a rotation of 110 years. When 2% interest is used then the total of the soil rent (value) in the same year is $85.50, making the annual soil rent $85.50 & 0.02 = $1.71. This equals, f soil renteWee.....- URGIGd Leo, 1 A SUB ARO os « $1.71 ein years) , interest on the accumulated wood capital ............ 5.33 L Metals < siche Reo Ene Bee es OS LENO on esis wis oh 6 $7.04 The largest soil rent value is figured for a 80-year rotation with $98.80. The mean annual forest rent for the same rotation carries annually $5.58 per acre. This gives, SE) COG OO Di eR SLAC RAN coos SO 2 aL $1.08 (S0years) + interest on the accumulated wood capital ............ $3.60 MY ell erg earn a UREN Cea cack Shales ole hous ERO os I $5.58 “The true “rent” which ts possible through the managing of the forest income, lies in soil rent, which is determined by adhering to the rotation of the highest forest rent. The difference between soil rent and forest rent, 1. e. the interest on the accumulated wood capital, is nothing, more than an expenditure which ts necessary to make in producing the soil rent. The forester has to subtract this from the forest earnings, or, commercially speaking, to equalize expenses incurred on accumulating debts. “In our example the forester has a yearly income of $7.04 per acre by adhering to a 110-year rotation. If he figures correctly, he will subtract $5.33 as costs of the enter- prise and he will actually net only $1.71 (soil rent). By adhering to the financial rotation he earns an average of $5.58 per acre. The expenses demand only $3.60; so he nets $1.08 * Endres, p. 234. Since no comprehensive original work has been done in the U. S. on soil rent calculations, it was thought best to give a translation of the best German treatise on the subject. 42 American Forest Regulation “The greater profit which the 110-year rotation has over the 80-year rotation is only an ostensible one. In reality the 80-year rotation brings the forester a greater net profit ($1.98 — $1.71 = $.27) per acre over the 110-year rotation. “The yearly loss, which the forester suffers through the shorter rotation . .. . is equal to the gain between soil rent and forest rent. “In consequence of the previous facts, it is evident that the highest income in connection with area is made in managing for forest rent. “This is true when we consider forest rent as a clear profit. In reality this is not the case. The greatest part of the forest rent is made up of interest on stored-up wood capital that becomes larger, the longer the timber remains in the woods, i.e., the longer the rotation. This interest, as mentioned before, is no gain to the forester but is enterprise expense or debt that has to be met out of the forest rent. “Tn ‘Handbook of State Investigations,’ III Vol., p. 602, the following explanation is given of managing for forest rent: “The followers of this idea figure the forest as a box out of which we can take, periodically, a sum of money called rent. How much this will require for expenses causes no worry.’ The remarks by Bose, Urich and Baur against this, given in ‘Centralblatt,’ 1893, are of scientific interest. “The forest rent thus comes at 110 and the highest soil rent at 80. “We can also say that by changing the rotations which brought the highest forest tent we change conditions (that existed since the primeval world) since the forest has always been handled under this rotation. The forest owner, whether private or state, will necessarily suffer a clear loss. This is also true in a spruce forest with a working group of 110 acres; using a I10-year rotation will give a forest rent of $7.038 * 11lo= $774.20; using a rotation of 80 years gives a yearly forest rent of $5.58 & 110 = $613.25. The net gain in yearly forest rent amounts to $774.20— $613.25 = $160.95. This gain however (if we consider soil rent) will be more than used up by the interest earned on the stored capital, that had been liberated due to an earlier rotation. This carries $5.33 capital at interest per acre for the 110-year rotation, as follows: $533. 110 = $20,315; $0.02 and for the 80-year rotation, $3.00 X 110 = $19,794.50, the excess ($29,305 — $19,704.50) being $9,510.50. The owner has this $9,510.50 as specie (gold coin) drawn out of the forest and can put it in the bank at interest. Should he get only 2% interest, he earns a yearly rent of, $9,510.50 X 0.02 = $190.21, which amount easily makes up the forest rent gain. The actual yearly income gained through shortening the rotation is shown as follows: 80-year rotation, $613.25 + $190.21 = $803.46 110-year rotation, $774.46 Clear gain from 80-year rotation $20.26 Should the forester receive a 3% interest rate on the liberated capital (this rate being quite possible), it will give an interest gain of, $9,510.50 X 0.03 = $285.31 and thus the clear yearly gain will be, ($613.25 + $285.31) — $774.20 = $124.36. Now from the practical side a rotation cannot be changed so quickly in spite of the pecuniary gain on the liberated capital. Besides overstocking the local market, which may be of some importance, we also upset the normal handling and normal conditions of the stand. It is necessary (for such an undertaking) to formulate a definite working basis and allow time for the complete use of the liberated stock (timber). A primary consideration is the proper investment of the drawn out capital. If there is danger of not properly disposing of the capital, then it had better remain in the forest in spite of the fact that it earns no interest . atts _ The fundamental principles of the Forest Rent Management as compared to Soil Rent Management are: “(a) The forest rent theory is determined by the rotation as based on the area. The fundamental difference between the methods of rotation lies in the fact that the soil rent management discounts the intermediate earnings and costs to a definite period with compound interest, while the forest rent management simply adds and subtracts without considering compound interest . a. “(b) The forest rent management... . is built up on future earnings and costs. If we want to determine the time the forest rent culminates in a 30-year-old stand, we have to consider the earnings and the costs that are expected to take place at 80 to IIo years, therewith figuring the rotation of the greatest forest rent. “Therefore the belief that the forest rent theory fixes with more* certainty the rota- * When the forest becomes a “going concern” the opponents of the soil rent theory - Financial Rotations 43 tion period than does the financial (soil rent) rotation is fallacious and the adherers to this belief are misled. “(c) The rise and fall in earnings and expenses due to price changes has a pro- nounced influence on the rotation period. “An increase in operating costs and rise in stumpage value lengthens the forest rent rotation and vice versa. An increase of thinnings shortens rotations, whereas a lessening of thinnings lengthens them. (Read, Loreh’s, Handbuch der Forstwissenschft, II, Pp. 91.) “Tt is noticeable that a change in price level has more influence here than in the soil rent theory . ... A very small price increase ($0.31) lengthened the rotation from IIo to 120 years. “(d) The flexibility of the rotation period with change in price level carries with it the strict adherence to the principle that any excess or defective growth should be disposed of. “From this viewpoint the rotation of greatest forest rent has no advantage over the soil rent rotation. The advocates of the forest rent theory put it as a matter of fact that in the state forest operations the shortening of the rotations is done on the prin- ciple of highest forest rent. This assumption is ill founded. In actual practice the rotation of the highest forest rent is much higher than is usually accepted. “It is pointed out that Weber argues correctly when he shows that practical con- siderations must have weight in the choice of the rotation. Besides one must take into account, the growth of the final stands, the yield from periodic thinnings, average price per cubic meter, relative profit from different species, intermediate costs, cost of admin- istration and supervision, and state and municipal taxes.” Kirkland* argues that if all age classes are present in a forest, it is not necessary to use compound interest in determining profit because, “Since we are determining the current annual results year by year, compound interest is not involved. In other words we are working on a forest rent basis; ie., what will the forest earn each year on the investment? Partictilar emphasis should be laid on the fact that today we have large forests, and that any effective forestry work we do must be with these forests. Therefore, we can best work on the forest rent basis. Any forestry we do on bare tracts will be insignificant.” This viewpoint does not agree with the best European mathematical theory as has been seen by Endres’s discussion of the relationship between forest rent and soil rent. With the present widespread forest destruction in the United States it would appear that we must deal with bare soil. For a more cémplete discussion of the subject see books on valuation. It should be emphasized however, that in the United States soil rent rotations will usually be rejected for silvicultural and policy reasons and not because soil rent is poor mathematics. The idea that financial rotations can be based on the growth per cent of single trees has not gained credence in America. Few would agree that yellow poplar** “can be considered mature financially when their annual rate of increase in value becomes equal to the correct rate of interest on money.” No definite number of years is mentioned as the rotation, but instead maximum diameters according to different costs of operation-and different sites. 52. (B) Rotations for Maximum Soil Rent or Highest Returns Per Dollar Invested. Here the criterion of profit is the maximum revenue with expenses deducted, but all statistics must be carried at compound interest at an estimated rate. The customary method of computation is to figure the expectation values for different ages; the largest expectation value have more plausible arguments, but as a matter of fact if the forest devastation con- tinues in the United States there will be few forests that are “going concerns.” * Kirkland, Burt P., Continuous Forest Production of Privately Owned Timberlands as a Solution of the Economic Difficulties of the Lumber Industry. (Journal of Forestry, Vol. XV, 1917, pp. 41-42.) ** Ashe, W. W., Yellow Poplar in Tennessee, 1913, p. 36. 44 American Forest Regulation denotes the most profitable rotation or the rotation of maximum soil rent. The following is a complete formula for expectancy or soil value: Expectancy or Soil Value (see table of symbols) = =e gic hap (C$ + AE$) nn] For further details see § 116, page 92 of Forest Valuation by H. H. Chapman. According to Schlich,* “The expectancy value indicates the true economic value of the soil for forest culture because it is based upon the productive power of the land when used for the rearing of forest crops.” For practical purposes, if only the rotation is to be determined (and not the actual soil value), the following formula is sufficiently accurate: final yield + intermediate yields I.op*’—I The reason why this formula is a judicious approximation is that annual expense has no’real influence on expectancy value, the cost of formation and soil value almost none, and the yield from thinnings very little. There are two very important factors, namely, (a) rate of interest and (b) final yield. 53. (a) What Rate of Interest Should Be Used? The rate of interest is the most important problem and has been made more confusing by the world inflation incident to the Great War. Low interest rates mean longer financial rotations than do high rates. Schlich** shows that (for a Scotch pine forest) if the interest rate was 2%% (the rate often chosen for cafcula tions in England), there would be an indicated rotation of 80 years. Increase this rate to 3% and the rotation (based on the expectancy value) would be 70, and if 4%, only 60 years. Most European authors agree in the theory that a forest which yields permanently the highest net annual income (with interest) is the greatest benefit to mankind, other things being equal. On the other hand, there is a tendency on the part of the individual (and still more so if the state is owner) to forget past interest expense, if by holding a stand to a longer rotation, the gross or apparent net yield per acre is increased. Only when past expenditures constitute an obligation which must be met, and hence earned, will the true financial relation between cost and income (with interest compounded) be the determining factor in the rotation. As a matter of fact no one would argue that the state should take financial profit as its sole object in forest management, but it is usually admitted that the public welfare may be best served by giving proper consideration to value production along with a regard for the obligation to raise the largest amount of product most keenly needed by the locality. The public forests belong to the whole nation and the object of a financial rotation should be the highest possible production of material both for present and future generations. One of the main drawbacks to a narrow conception of the necessity of following blindly a short soil rent rotation (untempered by sound silviculture) is that future production might be impaired. Expectancy value = * Schlich, Vol. III, pp. 127-120. ** Vo]. III, pp. 127-29. Financial Rotations 45 According to Roth,* (1) The “normal” forest of central Europe in ordinary rotations yields two to three per cent on the sale value of the forest. (2) This per cent is independent of site. (3) Beech and oak exceed pine and spruce (in rate of interest) on one hundred and twenty-year rotations, because the growing stock is a less important part of the capital. (4) The rate varies in narrow limits for all reasonable rotations and is little affected by current expenses. (5) The rate does not materially vary with changes in stumpage value because capital and income are affected in like manner. (6) Extensive forestry with small expenses and small incomes yields practically as good a per cent as intensive forestry. (7) It is very doubtful if any business rate over four per cent should be used in forest investments (pre-war conditions). According to the figures cited by Roth, the per cent yielded by pine, spruce, oak, and beech, under ordinary rotations on four different sites of soil, is shown in the following table: TABLE 3. Rate of Interest Earned in European Forestry. | Oak—160-year Site Class | Pine | —— Spruce Oak Beech rotation I | 2D PE, 3.6 2.9 2.2 | | II | 7 ga 2.6 | 3 2.9 rl | | III 2. 2.6 | 33 | 3.1 2.1 | IV | 2. | 2.7 | 2 3. | It is clear that the quality of the soil does not materially affect the rate of interest earned. The inference that may be drawn from these figures is that the rate used for compound interest calculations should be from 2 to 3%, but there must be periods, such as during I914 to say 1930, when such rates appear low. But most calculations lead to false conclusions if high rates of interest are employed; any rate over 314% is doubtful. The length of the rotation is the crucial point. 54. (b) What is Influence of Final Yield? The final yield is next in importance. Quality increment of course increases the value of the final yield and hence lengthens the financial rotation. Because of the lack of yield data and reliable stock figures and statistics upon which to base calculations, the tendency (in American Forest Regu- lation) has of necessity been to ignore the need for computing financial rotations. For this reason a synopsis of what Endres says on the subject of financial rotations is given (in fine print, appendix A (b) ). * Roth, F., “Business Rate of Interest and Rate Made by the Forest.” (Forestry Quarterly, Vol. 14, 1916, page 258.) 46 American Forest Regulation 55. Illustrations of American Attempts at Calculating Maximum Soil Rent Rota- tions. One of the earliest intelligent discussions of rotation (with a financial view- point) found in American forest literature is by Allen in the western hemlock.* In reply to the question, “At what age can the second growth stand be most profitably logged and how can the forest be perpetuated?” he showed that small size material “may be cut in 40 years and that in 50 years logs will be produced which would be con- sidered a fair size in the East today.” Analyzing the mean annual growth, Allen says that at 50 years 40 board feet per acre per year could be produced; at 60 years, 366 board feet; at 70 years, 471; and at 80 years, 500; i.e., the economic rotation already dis- cussed. His conclusion was that “it appears, therefore, that the greatest production of wood can be secured by cutting second growth hemlock when it is about 80 years old.” He admitted that other points should weigh in forming a correct conclusion, such as natural regeneration, quality of material and net financial profit. He stated that “the rotation of greatest financial profit still remains to be reckoned. . . . the calculation can only be tentative,” but he concludes that 70 years is the most profitable financial rotation and that with $1.00 stumpage per thousand feet, the investment would yield 4%2% compound interest yet we must be cautious of advising too short rotations, for building timber is what the world needs. In an early state** report the conclusion was reached that, “Whenever this interest (in the financial yield table) falls below the rate which may be earned by the money into which the timber can be converted, the forest should be cut.” The authors conclude that the lower the rate used in the calculation of compound interest, the longer the timber may be left standing. With 4% interest and no quality increase, the time to cut any stand wouid be hastened ten years. This table, however, simply indicates the maximum age at which cutting should take place and does not determine the exact time to cut, because to answer the second question, we must know the items entering into the cost of production. With compound interest at 4% it was found that for white pine in New Hampshire the net profit would be the greatest between 50 and 60 years of age—with land valued at $5.00, cost of planting at $7.00, protection at 10 cents per acre per year, and current local tax rates on the timber and on the land. In addition to paying 4% on the money with a rotation of 55 years there would be a surplus of $71.26, or an additional profit of $1.29 per acre per year. Frothingham’s conclusions in regard to white pine rotations agree in the main with those (of the New Hampshire report) cited above, and he also agrees that the lower the interest rate, the later the financial maturity will occur. With 4% interest the owner can afford to hold the stand until it is 50 years old. If 6% interest is charged, the rotation must be reduced to from 40 to 50 years or a loss will ensue. He is correct in concluding that financial maturity does not coincide with volume maturity, because the mean annual growth in board feet culminated on site (1), at 60 years of age; on site (Il), at 75 years; on site (III), at 90 years. As Frothingham points out, seed years occur every 3 to 7 years, and if the stand is to be reproduced by natural means, it must be cut during a seed year. Therefore, it could rarely be cut precisely when financially mature***; this only serves to illustrate that rotation should be gauged by decades rather than by individual years, and that the final decision must be based on a number of considerations. *Allen, E. T., Western Hemlock (Bureau of Forestry Bulletin 1902, pp. 44-48). ** Forestry Commission of New Hampshire, 1905-06, p. 240. Reference is made to table 21. *** Krothingham, E. H., White Pine under Forest Management (Forest Service Bulle- tin 13, 1914, p. 36, special reference being made to tables 12 to 17, which deserve careful study). Financial Rotations 47 Ashe* defines rotation as “the most profitable age and size at which to cut,” and analyses the rotation for loblolly pine in North Carolina, according to whether the tree is in mixed or pure even-aged stands. In these mixed stands the “most profitable trees to cut can be determined by the rate with (at) which they increase in value.” On the basis of these single trees the author argues that “when the rate of increase in value declines to 6%, the tree can be considered financially mature.” In other words, his argument was based not on an investment per acre, but on the current income value of the tree, his conclusion being: “Trees should be cut, therefore, when they are between 14 and 15 inches in diameter, breast high, at which size their rate of increase in value (neglecting increase in price) becomes equal to the current interest rate.” With pure even-aged stands grown for sawtimber, the most important consideration, according to Ashe, is the “largest average per cent of (net) profit,” taking into con- sideration soil value, interest, taxes and administration, or in other words, the cost of production. The author admits that the expense of growing timber is variable, but in the calculations made, assumes a soil value of $5.00 an acre and 6% interest. The increase in soil value and stumpage value, he says, “will in part cover the cost of pro- tection and taxes,” but to be on the safe side, 1% should be deducted from the profit to cover taxes, protection and administration for the growing period, and he further contends that, “Since there is no cost of stocking other than protection and leaving seed trees, the initial investment is practically limited to the soil value. The growth of the seed trees, if they are carefully selected, should approximately cover the interest on the initial value.” This is illustrated in the following table: TABLE 4. Value of Fully Stocked Stands of Loblolly Pine, as Scaled by Doyle-Scribner Rule, at Different Ages on Different Quality Sites and Under Different Costs of Operation; and the Per Cent of Interest on an Initial Investment of $5 an Acre Represented by This Value. Quality I Rate of Rate of Rate of compound compound compound interest interest interest Ageof Operating onan Operating onan Operating onan stand expenses investment expenses investment expenses investment $11 of $5 an $13 of $5 an $15 of $5 an Years acre acre acre Per cent Per cent Per cent 25 $ 33 8 $ 18 6.1 $ 4 30 74 9 42 7-0 10 4.0 40 143 8 7 8.0 30 5.0 50 231 7 158 7.0 84 6.0 60 326 7, 243 (OL 159 6.0 70 423 . 336 6.1 249 4.5 80 406 406 316 Quality II 25 $ 6 0.8 SOS ag $i er 30 31 6.0 17 5.0 3 5% 40 80 7.0 47 6.0 14 3.0 50 132 6.5 84 6.0 37 4.5 60 193 6.3 136 Gee 80 5.0 70 267 206 *p 145 5.0 325 261 I 4.5 * Ashe, W. W., Loblolly or North Carolina Pine (North Carolina Geological Survey, Bulletin 24, 1915, pp. 135-137). It must be admitted that timber production will rarely yield as high as 6% unless there are considerable stumpage increases. 48 American Forest Regulation Quality III 25 30 wb he Se arse 40 $ 27 4.0 $ 15 $ 3 50 61 5.0 36 4.0 in are 60 07 4.5 65 4.5 32 3.5 70 141 sits 103 4.5 65 4.0 80 177 Rave 137 4.0 97 4.0 Different results would have been secured had the yield been based on mill run. The conclusion was reached that the less favorable the quality site the later is the age at which the maximum interest rate is attained; this agrees with the conclusion of European foresters. For pure even-aged stands of cordwood there is little, if any, increase in price with increase in size. Therefore, the volume of the stand and the cost of production are the proper bases for the rotation. “The cheapest cost. . . . . on all quality sites is when the stand is between 25 and 30 years old.” Such short rotations are often veritable nonsense. The conclusions on the cost of growing cordwood are illustrated by the following table: TABLE 5. Cost of Growing Cordwood in Fully Stocked Stands of Loblolly Pine at Different Ages on Different Quality Sites on Land Valued at $5 an Acre and Interest at Six Per Cent. Stem Wood Only from Trees Six Inches and. Over in Diameter. Value of $5 Cost ey growing a cord of Cost of growing a standard cord Age of compounded at 160 cubic feet, peeled of 128 cubic feet, bark included stand 6% for the period, less Quality Quality Years the initial investment I II III I Tah III 25 $16.45 $0.50 $0.74 $1.37 $0.26 $0.41 $0.75 30 23.05 55 79 1.31 31 44 75 40 56.40 £07, 1.34 2.02 59 78 TL 50 87.10 ae we, 2.49 83 1.05 1.45 According to Sterrett’s investigations* on the ash, “The financial rotation is lengthened by low yields, low stumpage values, and high initial investments, while the opposite of these shorten it.” It was argued that financial rotations may be altered according to the purposes for which the timber is grown; according to market conditions and seed year occurrence. From the silvicultural viewpoint short rotations are best, and long rotations in pure stands should be practiced only on the best sites, and then the ash should be usually underplanted. Rotations of 30 to 60 years are recommended. Special reference is made to table 6, which follows: * Sterrett, W. F., The Ash’s, Their Characteristics and Management. (Forest Service Bulletin 299, 1915, pp. 35-390.) The costs of the crop Vo X I.op"= value of the crop in n years (Vn). When the costs of the crop is less as in poorer quality sites n must be greater where p is constant. See Chapman’s Valuation. It should be noted that 6% interest rates in forestry calculations are rarely possible or advisable. Financial Rotations 49 Taste 6. Interest rates‘ (compound) to be expected on money invested in growing ash, where yield quality I, IJ, or III stands are secured, calculated for different stumpage values and for different initial investments. (Blank spaces indicate less than 3 per cent interest.) Total initial investment per acre. $5.2 $10.3 SIS $20.5 $25.6 $30.7 Compound interest rates (per cent) for yield quality I, II, and III stands. Te ee i EU I It 200 I Mie Suite BE Tin: Age of stand. Years Value of stump- age per 1,000 board feet. hb °o vf wn Ll eS Le | H = el Le | aw fabs he ~ w we . ma, RROs Me: ho ° ~ 30 5 ne CONT. «= COO--. NAQWUN AA DOUMOOYVUR SHAR ONE oR OT, W.-, ~hRO. < » Cable Os Bl ale our AYA. Anb-: 40 5 Se es sd Mon: ° aunt, NbN: w fo} WaPo, wh, | — mW e e 3-3 50 5 cle OMA, WAN, WOE, OnO «© OOe « ObhH- - bo uns, ~Ubw, no, shan: A reac COOH H Ro, - noe. w a : é Tt aes 3-7 60 5 ae OVALE) STESiun ©) NON NT OV oo en YOO: DUG: WHHORAAWN ON: WHR: + +> CnW: ENN Pp. ro) . ah, nt 3-7 ORO bw bY DH HW OHO ORY HH OND ns, WN 0: DAO. Bes rare Or yp os oe WN Sea . Ope Sh eh teal Cece Ot + Ch&w* WNO?NHH: Ov BRRW con N a ONS nf 5 Cait Ma oe * RON: LED. » ms « ya tat eens ©) fe) Outs ee 3-5 80 5 510 Deore os mh e 8 7 MRO NUR AAWH TT Dr DY NP OY HY NS PUI! OR AW DNONABADADHHA HO WDHWIWOO PRO AW, UU, UN, 4 on ane, HOM: Nn , hw QHO- mor Hoe . 3: Be 3: 4. CoH 3.5 Aor) EHS oF OO re Sey. 0 56 ame n — 1 Calculated by the formula p = 100 [Ve], where p = compound interest rate, n = number of years or rotation, S = stumpage value at n years; L=cost of land; F-=cost of formation; and A= cost of administration and taxes in n years at 6 per cent compound interest. Five cents per acre annually is allowed for administration (including fire protection) and one cent on the dollar (full valuation) annually for taxes. 2$s5 cost of land, and no cost of formation of stand. ®$5 cost of land, and $5 cost of formation of stand. Norr, As a matter of fact calculations such as 4$ro cost of land, and $5 cost of formation of stand. . 5 $10 cost of land, and $10 cost of formation of stand. these are often misleading. ® $15 cost of land, and $10 cost of formation of stand. 7 $15 cost of land, and $15 cost of formation of stand. The Forest Service has used this method of indicating the most profitable rotation on the assumption that money must be borrowed at 6%. At best it is an approximation because it is difficult to answer the financial rotation problem in advance with so many dependent variables. According to the formula used, the equation would work out for 50 years as follows: Poa tee (aye Sear ae = 100 (2 574-08 = 4.1°/0 Here the value of the land is added at 50 years as it is assumed still to be worth $5.00. Table 7, which follows, illustrates a method of determining the financial rotations* for eastern white pine in common use in the United States. In this case the most profitable rotation is 50 years and the result is more exact, according to the soil rent theory, than in the preceding equation. _ *Forest Mensuration of the White Pine in Massachusetts, 1911. (State Forester, Boston, p. 26.) 50 American Forest Regulation Taste 7. The Financial Rotation of White Pine. (Money valued at 4 per cent; value of land, $4 per acre; cost of planting, $10 per acre.) EXPENSES AND INTEREST. Cost oF co TAXES sis Be a 2 ; PRODUCING. 5% a5 5 bea. 24 a ON TIMBER ON LAND Z : Es #3¢ & en ka > : : * og § ea ne oho ° C8 vn) % oh = 633 BOO Aa} EO on 8 eee See ~% & we fe ae oo us ao Su oU a iy oy a aa 3 os 24; so aes Ay ee = oo a Ko Se gk Hg of GOs” 88 Sag Soh gee Ge (tee seceee eee be Ge) BES be ooh tee «ceo ee Come <5 Cee eo! See ee ee ae ee z V aren E-s ores re peo > og 2 §o < A a+ Og og 2 = 25 $ 40.50 $ 5s4o$ 2.7 . $1.50 $ 2.17 $ 6.66 $ a 66 $ 11.50 $ 35.49 $ 20.00 $ 5.01 30 75.00 1,000 2.70 3.03 180 2.00!" “2:07 2.43 I450 47.33. 1600.50.08 S07 35 195.20 1,269 7.70 0:32 2.10 3.82 11.78 acu 19.80 64.38 175.40 130.92 40 202.40 3,408 14.04 18.47 2.40 4.92 15.20 48.00 26.40 86.59 230.00 175.80 45 324.80 4,330 31.53 42.16 2.70 6.25 19.36 58.41. 44.23 126.18 280.57 1098.62 50 465.00 6,200 53.18 75.70 3.00 7.00 24.43 71.06 66.18 179.15 308.82 285.85 55 505.50 6,740 84.18 127.04 3.30 9.90 30.58 86.46 97.48 253.98 408.00 251.02 60 532.00 7,080 117.88 1092.60 3.60 11.35 38.08 100.79 121.48 342.82 410.52 189.18 65 506.00 7,548 153.28 281.32 3.90 15.18 47.20 127.98 163.28 471.68 402.72 94.32 According to Mattoon, the object of management with cypress should be “to secure the highest financial returns from the class of land involved . . . . and the continuous yield of the most valuable species.” His conclusion is that a 60-year rotation (with the object of raising poles) would be the most profitable age at which to cut.* In a recent calculation for Douglas Fir, Quality II, Hanzlik indicates a 70-year finan- cial rotation in the Western Cascades. ' ! | < S c le \3 2 S| =| =| s [sil [s tn MM rw *sSulUUIy T, Sy S S S a\* : oz FORTE ° 3) ° a m| 8| SB 8/8/8/ 8 | > 2) al al N]IN/CO| O = FH = 3 J . . . O oa >= P= 2 (om eS 33ls3/ 33/33) ° / = “nD Tear 0 O}+0 0/0 0/0 O/ -- dIOJaq apeoaq ur ao! oO fon n ssuluuly yy se poAow g oO 8 fos 2 oS 28 g S S - _ Ss _ oY ouNJoA [eIOL, Sh oS re RBIS ~ on . ny Ni ale ~ 3 ON ~ be) ° aS o & A a EH ee Pee SIS eS ye IS is lel = *sonye A aseduinis Sell ESS Wee iba SES” Tiss 3 aaniny etqeqorg i Diet|) i Uee el eee ied ira rete Bli je) oO o/o; 0°; 9; 0; 9o/9;0 CO S| S| 8} ssiesissisisis o KH} wm} Ol OLA) S/H] A] | A] 9] + -_ _ _ Lal _ Ln _ _ [x ‘ fF ns = SS al ane > eee 2e ol SS SSS Selse ies as Sa oe Eyes o| = = aS) sides eee oo] al of eclololelolelelole =) Tenuuy sseloAy In i] in IN| Ww} 19} O| O| O| O] 1} Oo Hw a) N C7 4 | OV) C0 100 100 |00 | IN} 1} in oY ~ = So > sa ar | S oo a re) SAS SS aS se Ss Ss s ;o| Fd 3) : Bo ¥ apeoaq, yoeq e10y Sir & i Pq PPA [eu Sil Poll, S| Oooo oy Ke) ° * of} 8] S| S/8isisisisisisis eal Se) Sep RH) lS Ey SA ASN REN NCE eye q a me} |B] SId|O] F] HIS] = as eS] A] oe] tM] wW)S] Nicolo] oO Y « Oo} 0} 0/0; 0/]/.0)/19n| 0/0 ddI], oseI.AW a he Belly aes 2 2 (Ea fe PS) : st} CS] Sl] Slod] S19) 6] A] I 00 3 JO WqSIOT al COlppets|) FC) S/S] =| APA] 9] 3| SIS -_ Lal Lam! _ Lal _ _ = < soe oFreev gl] } st] S] elalelealslajetele > Ons EY he Gl na S| io) | 69] 19] 19] 16 | NI NI 00 = ee le “SUIUUIY Ty, wars tle w|) “a! Sl aa 6]00 |\o ai0jag a1y a al sf mialslolalalaala Jag seer, “ON Oo} + om] NAlAlalAal Ss) ela a4 ‘aproaq =} e) ° S| o/;9o/9 org Url sSuruuiy TL ON SCOT SO ee = = + yO One A [eI], FSS SNe PIGS IS Ff Based on present National Forest Practice and Sales Regulations in Douglas Fir Region. Cost of Formation—nil. Computed by E. J. Hanzlik, U. S. Forest Service. Annual expenses—.20 per Acre. Data based on Standard Douglas Fir Yield Tables; Interest—3% per Annum (comp.). Ms. report by E. J. Hanzlik, U. S. Forest Service. Tax on Yield—35% of Gross Receipts.Rev. in Forestry Quarterly, Vol. XII, No. 3, pp. 440-51. B. — Yr+ Ta X 1. opt 2+ ... TqX1l.opt—a—C X 1. opt E lopt —1 a 56. Final Choice of a Rotation. The object of the owner will always be the principal factor in the choice of a rotation. This object may vary some- what according to whether the owner is a state, a company, or an individual. * Financial Rotation indicated at 70 yrs. 52 American Forest Regulation The length of the rotation will depend also on whether this principal object of management is the direct production of timber or the indirect benefits of the use of the forest for recreation or watershed protection. Since the use of aeroplanes has become so general in war, the French attach consider- able importance to the value of frontier forests as a screen to the movement of troops. This is but an illustration of the indirect protective value of forests which under exceptional circumstances would influence the choice of — a rotation and system of cutting. It is safe to lay down as a general rule that where the indirect benefits of forests are of greater moment with the owner than the mere production of timber, the rotation is usually lengthened. In a forest park such as Fontainbleau, near Paris, or in the famous Wiener- wald near Vienna, the rotation would be longer than a sound technique would permit were the production of timber the sole object. So-called protection forests on the slopes of mountains usually have their rotations lengthened through the mere fact of being managed for protection purposes, aside from the slow growth due to soil or exposure. The silvicultural treatment to be followed has an important bearing; sometimes this is the dominant factor as in the case of a simple coppice of oak where the sprouting capacity fails rapidly after 50 or 60 years. With naturally regenerated oak high forest a maximum limit may be set to the length of rotation because of the falling off in seed production. But if the main object of management 1s timber pro- duction, a rotation based on the maximum income in wood material is indi- cated if this coincides with the (forest rent) financial rotation. If the two do not coincide as seldom happens, then a compromise must be made by the owner on the basis of the best available data. According to Schlich,* “Tn the first place, the financial (soil rent) rotation should be determined as it alone gives a true expression of the economic value of the management; then, it should be ascertained in how far the objects of management demand a departure from the financial rotation; lastly, the financial loss involved in such a departure should be determined, so that the proprietor may have a clear conception of the payment which he is called upon to make in order to realize his special object.” As Schlich well points out, the drawbacks to purely financial rotations in impoverishing the soil must be borne in mind. Quantitative (economic) and financial rotations (which have been discussed at length) depend on more complete yield and market data than is usually obtainable during the initial stages of forest management. It is for this reason that this type of rotation has often been replaced in the United States by tentative technical or silvi- cultural rotations; an authority such as Endres** refers to these latter rota- tions as being of mere “historical interest’? because of the development in Germany of detailed yield and market data. 57. Summary of Principles Affecting Length of Rotations. Let us now summarize some of the principles upon which the determination of the rota- tion depends: * Schlich, William, Manual of Forestry, Vol. III, 1911, p. 202. ** Endres, Max, Lehrbuch der Waldivertrechnung und Forstatik, 1895, pp. 220-248. Financial Rotations 53 (1) The length of rotations tends to increase on poor sites and decrease on good sites. (Yet in North Germany there are short rotations on pure sand.) (2) In financial rotations (soil rent) the lower the interest rate, the longer the rotation allowed by the calculation, but other factors must be considered. (3) An increase in the quality of product yielded lengthens financial rotations. Quantitative rotations will vary according to the utilization in the tops, according to the log rule used, and according to the basic class of product (whether cubic, board feet, poles, ties, etc.). (4) When the mean annual growth begins to decrease, the per cent of rot increases; danger from defect limits the length of rotation with such species as white fir. (5) Rotations vary according to the ownership and purpose, silvicultural treatment, market and logging conditions, site, species, as well as with the character and condition of the stand. We must never forget that the world needs building timber. (6) With more intensive economic conditions there is always a tendency to shorten rotations; with extensive economic conditions longer rotations are indicated (with long cutting cycles). (7) In choosing a rotation technical, silvicultural, quantitative and financial considerations should be summarized before making the final decision. But the object of the owner must always have the dominant interest in deciding upon what rotation to choose. (8) Once a preliminary rotation has been established, modifications are necessary with economic changes. In the United States Roth advocates a rotation no longer than necessary to produce the kind of material desired and a reasonable income as well as to maintain the fertility of the land. He believes in calculations to show the highest net financial (forest rent) yield. He correctly emphasizes that in the future, market sizes will be smaller and rotations will be reduced by thinnings and by efficient planting. Roth also favors short rotations where open stands may otherwise suffer from insects and fungus.* ** The author dismisses the rotation of maximum volume and the rotation of forest rent, the former based on false public economy, the latter because based on false mathe- matical basis; there remains for discussion only the rotation of maximum soil rent and the technical rotation, the latter being defined as that which produces continuously the largest quantity of the most valuable marketable wood under the given conditions of site and market. These two rotations are in many cases identical (coppice) . The financial rotation depends in the first place on the choice of the rate per cent.” Recknagel first divides the customary European rotations according to whether (1) small or (2) large tracts. The average rotation for small tracts (presumably intensive forestry) he shows is 10 to 20 years less than for large tracts. Then he distinguishes between (1) plains and foothills, (2) intermediate mountains, and (3) high mountains; and within each topographic subdivision a further differentiation by species. But these data are not of real scientific value because the basis for the rotation under the different * Roth, Filibert, Forest Regulation, 1914, p. I17. ** Review by Fernow of article by Pilz (Forest Quarterly, Vol. 2, 1904, p. 183). 54 American Forest Regulation conditions is not given. In the plains the rotation might be purely on the basis of soil rent while in the mountains perhaps soil protection was of paramount importance in determining when to cut. His averages for small tracts of spruce are (1) 60-80 years in the plains and foothills, (2) 60-100 in the intermediate mountains, and (3) 80-100 years in the high mountains. Roth* says more specifically that the, “Rotation for largest volume in Germany and for fair to good site (site II) is about as follows: pine 60 years, spruce 90-100 years, beech and balsam 110-120 years. This fits in very nicely with the technical rotation for these species.” The writer agrees thoroughly with Schiffel’s conclusion that, “Today we know that a careful survey and critical investigation of stands as regards their silvicultural condition, a comparative observation of their development, and the proper selection and attention to their growth of species furnishes a much surer basis for securing maximum revenue than Pressler’s formula receipts.” Yet especially in American Forest Management, a forester cannot adopt ideal methods, but must weigh the results with the cost. An ideal might be to have complete fire protection, but the ideal may be shattered by considera- tions of cost. Will it pay?** must be answered before regulation measures are finally decided upon. It is too early to try to average or classify rotations established in the United States. In the majority of cases they have not been tried out so that they are purely theoretical rather than empirical. Extensive forestry means much longer rotations than will prevail later on because of the extensive conditions sufficient differentiation has not been made. With a possible shortage in the world’s timber supply, short quantitative rotations for maxi- mtum production are predicted; and quite probably in the tropics under favorable growing conditions the rotations may be one-half to one-third those required in the temperate zone. 58. Quiz. Define the maximum forest rent rotation. ; Review definitions of capital and value. Write and explain the forest rent formula. How does it differ essentially from maximum soil rent? from economic rotation? Under what conditions are soil rent rotations preferable? Why is the answer based on mean annual rather than current annual maxima? Is this rotation applicable to national forests? to woodlots in New England? to the southern pineries? What are the difficulties to its wider use? How would the rotation be affected by the omission of thinnings? by heavy inter- mediate returns? by natural regeneration? by heavy forestation expenses? How do large soil values affect the result? How does price increment and quality increment affect the result? Write and explain the soil rent formula. How do you arrive at the culmination of a forest rent and soil rent rotation for given conditions? Give a simplified form of the soil rent formula. How important is the rate of interest used? * Review by Fernow of article by Schiffel entitled Rev. Reinertragslehre in der Gegen- work, G. A. Schiffel (Forestry Quarterly, Vol. 2, 1904, p. 186). ** Recknagel, A. B., Certain Limitations of Forest Management (P. S. A. F. Vol. 8, 1912, p. 227). Recknagel has done a great deal for American Forest Management by publishing widely on technical forestry, much of it from reliable German sources. Financial Rotations 55 What rate should be chosen? Of what importance is the final yield upon the result? (The study of the translation from Endres may be made optional.) Comment on illustrations of financial rotations established in the United States. What should be the chief factor in the choice of a rotation? Discuss the choice of a rotation. What are some rotation variables and axioms? Cite some rotations established in Europe. Contrast these with those suggested for the United States. The student should be given rotation problems to work out in order to fix in his mind the relative length of rotations for given conditions according to whether they are physical, economic, etc. CHAPTER V1 THE NORMAL FOREST 59. Definitions of Normal Forest, Normal Increment.—Normal Forest— A standard with which to compare an actual forest to bring out its deficiencies for sustained yield management; the conception of an ideally regulated or organized forest; a forest with normal increment, normal age classes in size and distribu- tion, and normal stock. Normal Increment—The best increment attainable by given species on given sites. . Normal Age Classes—The presence of a complete series of age classes as will permit annual or periodic fellings to be made. Normal Growing Stock or Normal Stock—The amount of material repre- sented by the stands in a normal forest; practically, the contents of the normal age classes as represented in normal yield tables. The equalization period is the period during which it is planned to attain approx- imately normal stock conditions. (G., Einrichtungszeitraum.) 60. Discussion of the Normal Forest. The difference between the nor- mality of the normal forest and that of the normal yield table must be clearly understood. The normal forest is merely an ideal difficult to attain, while the yield of the normal yield table is always attainable since it is based upon the averages of actual measured stands. Even such a forest as the Sihlwald (cited by Roth) falls far short of being normal even from the sole viewpoint of normal age class distribution. Nevertheless the normal forest will always prove of value as a basis for comparison. The normal forest requires: (1) A normal distribution of age classes and a complete cutting series which usually leads to: (2) A normal increment. (3) A normal growing stock. These have already been defined and will be discussed in detail later on. A forest may be referred to as under-stocked when it has a growing stock less than the normal growing stock; or over-stocked when it has a growing stock greater than the normal growing stock. 61. Three Phases of Abnormality. As a matter of fact, forests are usually abnormal in three ways: (1) Over-stocked. A forest past the age of maturity may have more volume per acre than the normal. Therefore, there will be surplus growing stock which must gradually be removed. This surplus may be because there are too many acres of the older age classes (see # 3 below). (2) . Under-stocked. The increment may be more than the average, but the growing stock, because there is too large an acreage in immature stands, will be less than normal. Consequently, the forester may be called upon to economize by cutting less than the increment to accumulate a proper The Normal Forest Ly reserve growing stock. This is particularly true where the yield must be cut in board feet for sawmill purposes, because lumbering trees less than a certain size is usually uneconomic. The accumulation of growing stock to remedy a deficit is often secured by adopting a rotation that is more than the time required to grow the stand or by cutting less than the estimated sustained yield. (3) Volumes Normal, but Age Classes Abnormal. This is the worst form of abnormality because the entire forest may be practically of one age class (the reader should conceive of one age class as allowing a variation of 20 years). This is especially unfortunate because it will necessitate such a long delay before lumbering can take place again. It precludes the maintenance of a sustained yield. It represents the probable situation in the United States when our virgin timber is exhausted by destructive logging. 62. A Normal Distribution of Age Classes. This requires that separate age classes exist which will mature during each year or period of the rotation. These age classes must occupy areas whose yield will equal the same relative per cent of the total yield of the working group for the entire rotation that the year or period bears to the rotation. In theory each of these age classes must occupy areas of equal productiveness so that if they are cut at the proper age, equal annual or periodic yields are obtained. The basis for com- parison is the yield from yield tables. If one acre of a forest yields 50,000 board feet at 100 years while another yields but 25,000 then there must be two acres of the latter for every acre of the former in order to have a normal age class distribution. Where the increment of a forest with normal age classes is only half what it should be, its age class form would be normal and it might have a sustained yield because the beneficial results of a sus- tained yield are not wholly dependent on full increment per acre but on well distributed age classes. 63. Artificial and Natural Factors Influencing Distribution of Age Classes. Unfortunately an abnormal distribution of age classes is the rule because of artificial and natural factors. The artificial factors are: (1) A full cutting series is required. A cutting series is an aggregation of compartments (stands) in a proposed or actual sequence of cutting areas, the object being a distribution of cutting areas for administrative reasons, or to secure a final satisfactory distribution or location of age classes, especially to avoid damage by windfall and insects due to uniformity of stand and size of cutting area. It is therefore intended to interrupt a regular sequence of age classes. (2) The number of age classes hinges on the number of years in each age class (usually 20 years) and on the length of rotation adopted. If the rotation is changed, the number of age classes required is modified, and the forest which was normal in this respect for one rotation becomes abnormal for the next. (3) The area proper for each age class depends directly upon the total area in the working group and on the rotation and number of age classes. Consequently, areas which are normal for one rotation become at once too large if the rotation is lengthened or too small if it is shortened. 58 American Forest Regulation The natural factors are even more perplexing. There are always too large or too small areas or volumes present, requiring increases or reductions in given age classes. It is for this reason that the minimum time required for the transformation of a forest to normal age classes is one full rotation, and practical considerations usually call for at least two rotations or more. But as a matter of fact, the ideal is seldom, if ever, attained in age class distribu- tion, but if it is attained and the rotation is modified because of economic conditions, the process of regulation must start over again. Accidents, such as windfall, fire or unusual local demands which must be met, are continually delaying transformation to more normal conditions. 64. Normal Increment. The second requirement of a normal forest is normal increment. It is theoretically normal if there is maximum growth on all parts of the area for given species and sites. It is the goal of silvicultural practice. Just as in the case of age class distribution, normal increment can- not be attained until the second rotation, and not even then unless perfect success has been obtained throughout the first rotation—something that is entirely impossible. Normal increment does not serve as the basis for the regulation of the cut in the first rotation, since in this case actual increment is used as a base because normal increment would not apply. Actual incre- ment of normal or ideal stands, or even the average for the stands that are fully stocked, according to local or general yield tables, does not give the forester an idea of the growth on excess stands. The increment on existing stands must be determined in each case, and any attempt to regulate the cut, (based on the removal of surplus growing stock or on enriching the forest where the growing stock is deficient,) must be based on the study of the actual increment and not on the theoretically normal increment. 65. Normal Growing Stock. The third criterion of normality, normal growing stock, might be actually attained. But nevertheless it is simply an ideal, which unfortunately is often misunderstood. One writer contended that our knowledge of the forest is so indefinite and the irregularities so unending that a normal condition cannot be conceived, and that normal stock is therefore a delusion.* Often a forest may falsely appear to have a normal stock owing to an accumulation of volume in stands past the rotation age; this phase of abnormality must be recognized especially when a very short. rotation has been chosen. There is nothing in this argument to justify throwing overboard the idea of normal growing stock. It only serves to emphasize the need for bearing in mind that normal growing stock is an ideal to steer by. The length of rotation is especially important in affecting the normal growing stock, where the forest is to be managed on the basis of permanent production. This is true because the rotation, (1) Determines the amount of timber that must exist as forest capital in order to obtain a continuous yield; and (2) Indicates whether a surplus or deficit exists in the actual forest under * Review by Fernow, entitled Heresies Regarding Normal Stock. (Forestry Quar- terly, Vol. 14, 1916, pp. 524, 553-67.) The Normal Forest 59 management and tells whether more or less than the actual increment can be cut. 66. Growing Stock Formulae. To obtain a clearer conception of the normal forest and its normal growing stock reference is made to figure 3. 2000 SBUEEEGGSSERUESUSGRSEETSEETaSToETESEGERTOBEESEETESTEERTOENGE RSC 4eeR se eee | (a ha tals S| i | Be | | BES rTP im let i td fee [lel CT] pap lemeeerer (ijeqey pepe feet ial [eae 3 HH SSN 4 ea in [Sane eee jsseestaet RRC CECE x 1750 | | ooo | cl Cy |_| x ane iz 1500 — A C o + | aaa , 1250 ptt et pe . [a iaa] HHH — Bo BEEEEEEE EEE EEE EEEEEEEE EEE EEE EEE EEE EEE EEE EEE EEE fa stesstecuittasttessitacttcctreerattecsteesteaetttsstecsteass A < Bier lates ee Tas ee deals | HI aot ace. oe noo fo) ERS Res PEER |_| fa] matey © 1000 HU DDE eee ERE | cE fa ii fa i sf fsa fas} L SS000 00000050000 805050 | PERERA eee) 202 ae a PACE #a tail oleae - ttt Et Baa / | ee | Hea nes | eR feist eisieetal- abe mine Gliese ee EEE 4 aaa6 A nae 2 ee eeese Sees a tenesaseeeavey ZEUTGEEETD cee Pere HE Ho 3 A a : Be BEER EEEE ECE FEE EEE Eee RR TEER EE ses bcguceeeeeereene’ custeees fora fee queen atiat ical aster coat SSereetereetestece anmieeiuetes ee x Bu aa H EEE FEE i sucunuseseeeeesSEEUlnee (Azt?s7@auee7tseeCEEecELvseeeteenesel ie labstsbe alate ac aati eter AG Ggeop Be Poh Fe PEER EEE eee rr aeaneencdnue E Hoeesaee= geal SESS0800>2840_G000508 Oma me Pape ero T rele eae canescuni FH oe Fy] ESE eae = FEE ERE EEE EEE EEE CEE EE EEEEEEE EEE PERE ea Daum + BE H aGeae SEER ooo o=4 CCEA PEEL i ial gana uu Se SS67 (GG05867 2Gu07 Se gu cUnE SE EERE e URGE ESR Seu EEE EGEEESGESnS Pe easels aie See ietcetet EEEEEE EEE TE0e One meet (i mieinininieed talib ele eles 4 clalel a El 6 a dn Be ae eee biel tL pit SESSEERBE3 Fer tee BECHER EEE EEE EEE EERE PREECE See neneaiteecee st eceeeesetsceseer ees eae Cones ceseeeesces=s Begs oe Tappa Joes ace dee CASSee Gos c sec eeoe OCS e Seer ner mre 5, SBE Soe PE Fafa si fiat) Sapa eee eee epee een eRe S| pei A) of efedeolea B BEERS PEE EEE EEE EEE Ere PEPE peat 1 (oletattedelesl fete tet ab aek terkeet= ebslelof 11 eos sesse =Aa=<-o5 : Fic. 3. Diagrammatic Representation of Normal Growing Stock and a Comparison with Mean Annual and Current Growth for a 60-year-old Stand Sixty Acres in Area. A forest of 60 acres is here represented as being managed on a rotation of 60 years. If the entire forest were very abnormal and contained 60 acres of mature timber, then the volume would be represented by the diagram a-b-d-e. But let us suppose it is year old, one acre two years old, normal. Then there will be one acre one one acre 59 years old, and one acre ee eee 60 American Forest Regulation 60 years old, or about half what the forest would contain if it consisted entirely of fully mature stands. The column b’ represents graphically 60 years growth and the column at the extreme left of the triangle represents one year’s growth. From this it is clear that a simple formula for normal growing stock is as follows: G"® = rotation & m.a.i. ~ 2 or G= ai ats! It is customary to ignore the effect of thinnings on the equation. This formula falsely assumes that current annual growth and mean annual growth remain equal. The author obviously overlooked the fact that growth is not laid on in annually equal quantities, but that it varies according to the age of the tree. The fallacy lies in the assumption that current growth and mean annual growth are the same for all ages. Asa result of this false premise, if most of the growth is laid on in the latter half of the rotation, the actual growing stock required is less than that given by the formula, because the mean annual growth or proportional volume is less for the younger age classes. This is particularly true when the growing stock is measured in manufactured products, where it is almost universal that a tree has no measurable volume in board feet until it is 15, 20, or more years in age. This fallacy of assuming that growth is a straight line is shown diagram- matically in fig. 3, where a-cm-ccc-b represents current growth and a-cm-mmm-b the mean annual growth according to table 8. To correct this inaccuracy of assuming the growth a straight line ab, Moore* (P.S.A. F., Vol., VII, 1912, pp. 15-16) originated a formula which is a makeshift plan based on the disadvantage of the board foot rule but unquestionably it gives ; . : 1 yee ol : more conservative results in the United States than the formula ae His U Bg AS a! ; formula is x , where r’ is the rotation minus the age when the tree becomes merchantable. In this case the tree would be (see line fb, fig. 3) merchantable at 15 years or half way between 10, when the yield is 0, and 20, when the yield is 4500 (see table 8). The use of this formula Moore claims will give a more correct surplus or deficit when compared with the actual stock which includes only the merchantable trees. He states that, “Where the increment is known to be too low, it is unwise to try to correct the error by using r (the whole rotation) instead of r’ (the difference between the age of the merchantable trees and the rotation). The whole rotation will give a growing stock’ which is actually more correct, but mathematically incorrect and hence uncertain; it may be too large or too small. It will also give too low a cut of increment in the final formula and will not be counterbalanced by a high surplus.” While Moore’s argument is sound his substitute formula according to M. H. Wolff is incorrect. The proof of this, and the correct formula, are best developed graphically. * See Schlich’s Manual of Forestry, Vol. III, 1911, pp. 222-227. In intensive forestry it would make a difference in the amount of the normal stock whether it were calculated in spring before growth, in summer after growth, or in autumn after the years cut, but for American conditions this complication can safely be omitted and calculations may be standardized to correspond with the summer when the year’s cut is half completed. The Normal Forest 61 D c 5 H Li Fic. 3(a) Proof of Wolff Formula. Assume the triangle DBC represents the total normal growing stock on any tract includ- ing all merchantable and unmerchantable (nonestimable) sized stands, DC being equal to the rotation age (r), and BC being equal to the mean annual increment (1) of the whole acreage. “I’’ can be more definitely expressed as the mean annual increment per acre (i). times the rotation age (r) multiplied by the total acreage (A) divided by (r). T= axne Assume also that DH represents the merchantable age (s), and that FH is the volume at that age (I’) of the annual acreage to be cut over. Volumes below this age are not estimated. Moore recommends that properly, the normal stock should be figured as I = or in the figure above to SOLES Diagrammatically this is equal to the triangle BCH. This assumes that volumes at merchantable age commence at zero. But really the volume at the minimum estimateable age is appreciable. It is theo- retically the mean annual growth times the number of years. Thus in our figure the normal growing stock above merchantable age (call it GN for convenience) is the quadrilateral (A trapezoid) FB CH. Hence Moore’s suggested formula excludes tri- angle FBH and gives by that much, too low a figure. To obtain the correct and most convenient formula for normal growing stock above merchantable age, it is necessary to find the value of the area FBCH, in terms of I, r, and s. f= BGA, —) Ciandicsi— DEH (1) ECE Eee x Hee aa eee (ay, elsseaiee: oe ee or eS PR Me r (3) Substituting for I’ in (1) ar PBGH— xX (r—s) Is+Ir 2 x G—s) 62 American Forest Regulation I(s+r) (r—s) arenes (4) Lith 18) 2r This is mathematically the correct formula to use, but see table 9. 67. Illustration of Simplest Normal Growing Stock Calculations, The values result- ing by the three different methods in any example are interesting to note. Assume t= 60 years, and S=1I5 years (i.e., when tree becomes merchantable). Then by the (a) ordinary method: Gan ee (or 1X30; by (b) Moore’§ suggested method Gn ee 1 or 1X 22.5; by the method (c) here recommended (after Wolff) 2 2 Ga < 60 IS or i X 28.125, 2(60) Assuming the mean annual increment at 60 years given in table 8, we have (see table 9): @), 229s 2s soe 30,090 feet B. M. per acre. (b) 1003 Xx Ce 22,567 feet B. M. 2 (c) EeOS: (60° rset SPT = 28,209 feet B. M. I20 68. Yield Table Method of Computing Growing Stock. None of these formulae are as accurate as the result obtained by adding yields from a yield table (see table 8) expressed as a formula; thus, | => Li) TOW el oie ae ge a r at 10 years, b at 20 years, etc. — = normal stock per acre, where a= the yield 10 years 20 years 30 years 40 years 50 years 60 years CM ar © © © © 0ooo ft. 4500 ft. * 13900 ft. 32800 ft. 49too ft. 60200 ft. Fic. 4. Diagrammatic Scheme of the Yield Table Yields. Referring to Figure 4, let us conceive of our normal forest composed of Six square areas, each 10 acres in extent; with the assumed rotation of 60 years, each square will then correspond to 10 years of the rotation. In computing the normal growing stock formula, it is clear that each yield figure from the normal yield table must be multiplied by Io to secure the normal growing stock for a forest of 60 acres. Half the yield in square f is taken because cutting is going on in the oldest age classes; consequently all the timber will be standing the first of the decade but none of it at the expiration. 69. Illustration of Calculating Normal Growing Stock from Yield Table. As an illustration of the calculation of normal growing stock by the yield table method, the following is given for site (1), white pine in New Hampshire managed on a rotation of 60 years. The yield assumed is as follows*: * Frothingham, E. H., White Pine Under Forest Management (Forest Service Bulle- tin No. 13, 1914, table 6, page 23). 63 The Normal Forest TasLeE 8. Yield of White Pine in New Hampshire. Current annual Mean annual Lumber yield increment, board feet increment board feet per acre, board feet Year n 3 = oO fe mon CADS TOOO = (See Fig. 4) 0000 a 4500 b 13900 c 32800 d 49100 e 60200 f (69900) Adopting the formula we have, 10(4,500 + 13,900 -}- 32,800 10(130,400) = 1,304,000 board )ubeard feet 2 60,200 33 plus per acre. + 49,100 +-—" When a rotation of 60 years is assumed, the ay be fi 97 feet on 60 acres or 21 gured for an acreage equal to the number normal growing stock formula result m of years in the rotation. 1 Sei Sy RES USSSA SARA SS SSNS AK SES oe i ROSS a uN A SS : SAUNGRESN ORS SRS N : Boho NESS ata apeatac SRENEN SRC me st N a sf sa HEARNE NSN SAIN — Ht me S used? Why in a 60-year rotation is a normal forest of 60 acres assumed? What is Flury’s constant? How is it computed? What is its advantage over the yield method? Why are normal growing stock calculations important even in extensive forestry? 67 CHAPTER Vil REGULATING THE CUT 76. Definition and Aims of Regulating the Cut. Regulation of the cut in the narrower sense means the fixation in advance of the annual or periodic cut, which in the normal forest would be equivalent to the annual growth* (G., etats- bestimmung, ertragsbestimmung; F., fixation de la possibilite). The broader aim of regulating the cut is three fold: (1) To cut each stand at rotation age (maturity) and secure the maximum required product. This is largely economic. (2) To cut about the same amount of material of the most valuable product each year or decade. This is economic and financial and is all important. (3) To reproduce about the same area each year or decade. This supple- ments paragraph I. (1) If each stand is cut at maturity, it will probably benefit the stand at the expense of the future of the forest because no progress would be made towards a regular yield which ultimately looks for regular age class distri- bution. On the other hand, if stands are cut when very overmature or imma- ture, costly silvicultural sacrifices may result. (2) If the present volume output is considered of first importance, it will mean a sacrifice in future orderliness for present immediate regularity of cut. For a forest that has been impoverished proper regulation demands that its stock be gradually built up; while a forest with excess stock should have this excess gradually reduced. This may decrease or increase the present cut but need not seriously interfere with its regularity. (3) Unless a reasonably uniform area is reproduced each year or decade the ultimate normal distribution of age classes (and hence of the cut) will be defeated. To reproduce equal areas each year or decade is the least impor- tant immediate object but the most important ultimate one. 77. Basic Policy in Regulating the Cut. The first step in regulation is naturally to take stock and to divide the forest into timber productive and non-productive types as well as into management subdivisions. The next step is to obtain accurate growth data on the productive areas. Before fixing the annual cut—one of the aims of regulation—the following general principles should also be recognized as basic: (1) The forest should be managed so as to furnish the maximum quantity of the kind of material required by the owner. Where desired, scenic and protection working groups may be excepted from regular commercial man- agement. *In the normal forest the current growth is the same as the mean annual growth. Before commencing chapter VII the student should read “Studies in French Forestry,” pages 243-260, so as to have the modern working plan clearly in mind. Regulating the Cut 69 (2) Other things being equal, cutting should be directed to the over- mature and mature stands and age classes. (3) Forest management must first provide for the prolongation and per- petuation of the timber supply—sustained forest production—needed by indus- tries and for the stabilization of labor, if this can be done without too heavy a sacrifice of technical aims. (4) The technical aims of every working plan lead to (3) above and should be: proper distribution of age or diameter classes, normal growing stock, and a proper silvicultural condition ensuring suitable regeneration and a perpetuation of the forest as a whole. Under certain conditions fire or watershed protection may be the chief technical aim. These aims must be carefully weighed and correlated.* But it must be recognized that no regulation or organization of a forest has the slightest chance of success unless it is based upon sound basic silviculture, because forest regeneration and forest production—both dependent on sound silvi- _ culture—must be successful or there will be no real forestry. In our extensive western forests, which must at present often be logged by corporations capable of maintaining and operating large capacity plants with railroad feeders, there is usually presented the following problem which is exceedingly difficult to compromise without serious sacrifices: (a) Devastate mature and over-mature timber rapidly to avoid loss from decadence with a consequent heavy cut during the first cutting cycle, a cut which cannot be maintained after the store of ripe timber is harvested. The proper age class distribution will be delayed for a considerable period. This is not forestry. (b) Cut off mature and over-mature timber gradually assuming a consid- erable and increasing loss from decadence but aiming at a yield during the second cutting cycle equal or nearly equal to the original cut. The age class distribution will be secured at an earlier date than if (a) is adopted as the fundamental cutting policy. The actual losses from decadence are often over- emphasized. (c) Compromise between (a) and (b) so as to avoid part of the loss from decadence necessitated by (b) but obviating the serious hiatus of cut required by (a). : This problem must be decided in each case before the details of regulation can be intelligently worked out. Nor must the silvicultural requirements for proper regeneration be lost sight of. With plan (b) certainly regeneration will be surer than with (a) in difficult soil conditions such as often occur in Arizona. The administrator should always remember that stability of pro- duction is more important than to save timber that may be lost. Speaking in terms of intensive selection forests in France, Biolley** argues that since the cut depends on the amount of the forest crop, it is better to * Eldredge, I. F., says (J. of F., 1920, pp. 284-291) the aims of management plans in the national forests of the Southern States are: maximum production of merchantable timber, permanence of local industries and forest labor, salvage of deteriorating timber, restocking mistreated areas, regulation of cut (by stand method). ** Biolley, already cited, p. 56-57. 70 American Forest Regulation decide on the cut after it is seen what the amount of the crop really is. He says: “The growth, which is the fruit of the treatment, can only be known after the product is disclosed; the yield can thus only be a prediction of the harvest (more or less strongly justified) for a very short lapse of time. . .. It is useless and an error to make predictions for a long time ahead; it is even worse to fix a yield for a rotation as is done, even if it is subject to revision every twenty years, for the yield-decree ties the hands of the forester, and substitutes for the worry of the silvicultural aim of the cutting, preoccupation over the volume which it is forbidden to exceed or obligatory to reach; moreover, the treatment (the essential thing) gives way to regulation and cannot be the objective.” What Biolley wants is not an imposed yield but a crop proposal. He desires to emphasize the need for placing more stress on silviculture and less on the regulation mathematics—a policy essentially sound if not carried to extremes. There must always be leeway in applying a prescribed yield figure—silviculture must not be throttled—but this is no excuse for not prescribing, systematizing and regulating the cut. 78. To Attain Regulation Compromises are Necessary. There is thus a conflict between the objects of regulation which entail a compromise. The complete attainment of a single goal (such as a sustained annual or periodic cut) may be sacrificed so as to attain partial progress toward age class distribution, or cutting stands when they are ripe. In another case it may be wise to cut before or after maturity so as to have a more regular immediate annual cut for a local sawmill or to insure better age class distribution during the next rotation. In still another instance more or less than the increment may be cut to attain normal stocking or to allow the development of young stands or prevent the decay of over-mature timber. A point in theory to remember is that under no circumstances would the annual cut be exactly equal to the mean annual increment unless the normal forest had been attained—difficult to attain even under intensive European conditions,, 79. Relation Between Increment and Growing Stock. ‘The principle deter- mining the relation between increment and growing stock is normally as follows: one-half the increment will be upon trees cut within the rotation and one-half on the new crop not yet started. At the end of the rotation all timber now standing, including seedlings, will have been cut and the growing stock will consist of entirely new stands. For accurate regulation accurate estimates are needed. But these cannot precede the demand, and seldom can be complete for entire forests because only areas where sales are a possibility can be estimated accurately and intensively. On the other hand, no real regulation is possible till the working group has been fully covered by some form of estimate. It is for this reason that rapid, cheap and approximate timber surveys are fully justified on areas not accessible for sales for many years to come. But the resulting regulation cannot pretend to be very accurate in detail, nor is this accuracy necessary as long as the cut is fairly conservative. In fact it would be faulty forest management to pay for intensive timber surveys when it was a certainty that the stand could not be cut over for many years. Until there is a market Regulating the Cut 71 with transportation to it regulation must be preliminary in character. Thus there is always a creative period when approximate methods are sufficiently accurate for obtaining increment and growing stock. Yet Moore* is exactly correct when he says: “A thorough understanding of the silvicultural requirements of the different trees and of the methods of cutting which will result in a maximum production of the most valu- able ones is the first essential. In the long run it is generally far better to have over- cutting under proper silvicultural methods than to have a perfect regulation of the cut with poor methods of silviculture.” If one must choose between two evils, sound silviculture must not be slighted ; but this does not justify devastation. 80. Definitions and Classification of Methods of Regulating the Cut. Gen- eral classification of methods of regulating the cut may be recognized: (1) Normal stock or formula methods, when the amount of cut is determined by comparison of actual with normal conditions and the cut is in part regulated by a volume formula for a rotation or equalization period. (2) Allotment methods, when a rotation is fixed and for a given year or period of the rotation a certain area, a certain amount of stock, a certain number or size of trees is allotted to be cut. (3) Individual or stand methods, when each stand is investigated for its maturity and designated for cutting, provided other age classes are in existence to assure continuity of crops. (This is usually supplemented by area and volume check.) An attempt has been made to merge the allotment principle (namely of alloting stands for cutting in a definite period) with the various methods which make use of the alloting of stands directly or indirectly. A glance at table 11 shows the classification of regulation methods adopted in this volume as contrasted with Recknagel, Roth, and Schlich. The writer has tried to select one typical form method for each different class of regulation. Volume methods have been given first because they have first been used in the United States with irregular virgin stands. In this volume the methods have been arranged as follows: A. Volume basis. (1) Growing stock, (2) Increment, (3) Increment and growing stock, (4) Size classes, and (5) Tree as unit. B. Area basis. (1) Pure area, (2) Area (and age) allotment by periods. C. Area-volume (and age) basis. (1) Volume and area—volume allot- ment by periods, (2) Americanized stand selection, and (3) Cutting cycle and felling reserve. * Moore, B., Methods for Regulating the Cut on National Forests (P. S. A. F. Vol. VII, 1912, p. 11). 72 American Forest Regulation TasLe 11. Relative Classification of Methods for Regulating the Cut used by Different 3d Ed.). T. Stand Selection A. Area methods. (Judeich). II. A. Fixed Annual Coupes. B. Allotment by Periods 1. Area. 2. Volume. 3. Area and Vol- ume. C. Increment and Growing Stock. 1. Austrian. 2. Hundeshagen. 3. Von Mantel. 4. Brandis. D. Increment and Growing Stock Combined with Allotment of Areas to Periods (Heyer). Writers. VII). 1. Fixed yearly cut. 2. Area allotment. 3. Limited area allot- ment (Judeich). B. Volume Methods. 1. Volume allotment. 2. Growing stock. a. b. c& Austrian (and Heyer ). Hundeshagen (and Von Mantel modifi- cation). Combined methods (see p. 158). . Diameter limit. C. By Area and Volume. I. For Entire Forest. 1H Ti: - wWNH Schlich (p. 3rrt,. vol, III, Roth (p.! 230-159 also p. Recknagel (p. VIII, also Woolsey in this volume. p. 67-126). A. Area. A. Volume Basis. B. Volume. I. Growing Stock 1. Growing Stock. Basis. 1. Von Mantel. 2. Increment. 2. Masson. II. Increment. 3. Increment and 1. Current Annual Increment. Growing Stock. III. Growing Stock and Increment. 4. Size Classes (and 1. Austrian. 2 Karl: Periods). 3. Hundeshagen. : 4. Breymann, 5. Tree as Unit (and 5. Heyer. IV. Diameter Classes. Increase in Size). 1. French metho of 1883. ‘ B. Area Basis. 2. Indian method. 3. Diameter class 1. Pure Arca. method (Huf- nagle). one eos, ee 2, Area_ Allot- ment by Periods. 1. Gurnaud. C. Area-volume Based on Age Basis. Classes. 1. Volume and Area - volume Allotment by 1. Direct method. 2. Hufnagl. Basic Scheme of Periods. 3. Stand Method Periods. (Judeich). 2. Americanized Periods. Stand Selec- . Area. ; tion. . Volume. 3. Cutting Cycles . Area and vol- and Felling IE. A ops Reserve. . American coe. method (Chap- man). The following methods of regulating the cut cited by Recknagel (his symbols have been used) have not been described in this volume for the reasons given: Name of method Masson’s method Swiss method** Austrian formula “Kameraltaxe” Hundeshagen’s Taste 12. List of Formulae Omitted from Text. Page* Scheme or Basis. Why discarded. 74 Same basis as Von Mantel. Duplication. Divide volume of oldest size Faulty regulation unless forest 74 classes by c. a. i. of entire normal. Scientific interest stand to get number of years only. volume of class must last. Ae pt Because r is rigid; it is better 78) (Gnt—=1- >= to distribute surplus or defi- r cit according to local condi- where i= actual m. a. i. tions. yony ny Identical to Von Mantel or 8s Cit = le a Ll Karls “Austrian,” if period of distribution = % rotation. - Regulating the Cut 73 Breymann’s 86 Vy —ny 2 (here a=age). na _n-+ix—nv x where i=a. m. a. 1. x =x years or period of dis- tribution. Heyer Cut = vol. of trees or of di- r ameter classes 5 years+ A ea ee over-plus increment thereof (Hufnag]l) in ; years; this sum divided i by ; equals the cut. Because surplus or deficit dis- tributed over whole rotation. See paragraph 85. rigid scheme rather than a distinct method of regula- tion. If volume of upper classes very deficient, there might be no cutting. (Average volume per acre= Too rigid and no basic method volume of oldest stands di- of regulation. If data it re- quires is available, modified allotment method feasible and preferable. 4 See above. Direct method 108 vided by area occupied by (Huinag]l) stand) * allowed area to be cut = volume to be cut. Yield = rotation volume--areaX increment*** : Hufnagl’s method 110 rotation 2 *In Recknagel’s “Theory and Practice of Working Plans.” ** C. H. Guise, in J. of F., 1917, pp. 564-573 on “The Swiss Method of Regulating the Cut in Practice” advocates a further trial of the method and states it gives a higher cut than does the Von Mantel formula in the case cited. *** Mean annual increment gives a cut 10-20% less than if current increment used. CHAPTER. ois (A) VOLUME METHODS OF REGULATION 81. General Principles and Classification of Volume Methods.* Formula methods should rarely be relied upon as the sole basis for establishing the cut; they should be used as a rough check against other methods that take into consideration volume and area as well as age. The use of a formula may be necessary in order to answer a problem in yield which does not yet justify the use of more intensive methods. Under American conditions the use of the board foot unit of measure is a dangerous complication in the use of volume because young stands may yield no board feet and yet the aggregate of trees have a considerable cubic content per acre. The trees from such stands yield cordwood but no lumber. Therefore the use of an area check when using formulae methods is all the more essential. Care has been taken to recommend certain formulae methods for use under specified conditions as differentiated from methods of mere scientific interest which nevertheless are explained for the information of the student. Regulation on the basis of volume has been classified as follows: Main Basis Secondary Basis Formulae (A) Volume. (1) Growing stock. (a) Von Mantel. (2) Anerement. (a) Gurnaud. (3) Increment and (a) Austrian. (Other growing stock. forms of Austrian formulae discard- ed’) (4) Size classes (and (a) French method of periods). 1883. (5) Tree as unit. (a) Indian single tree method. (b) Diameter limit. Intermediate yield. \Whatever method of calculating the cut is employed, the regulation of the intermediate cut from thinnings, clearings, weedings, etc. should be based upon the principle of cutting approximately equal areas annually or periodically. It is most essential to keep the young stands from becoming too dense and to eliminate undesirable trees as well as the less promising species; then if intermediate cuttings be limited by volume, it might occur that areas in need of thinnings could not be reached. Such areas must be cut over systematically and this can be best insured by covering a certain area each year even if the volume cut is slightly exceeded. This * Methods noted as “of scientific interest” might have been termed “of academic interest.” Volume Methods 75 yield from intermediate cuttings is usually estimated so as to secure a tenta- tive volume figure for the annual or periodic budget. In the treatment of the various formulae the method has been (1) defined, (2) discussed and the advantages and disadvantages summarized, and then (3) illustrated by practical examples. Methods noted as “of scientific inter- est” will not generally be used in the United States. 82. (1) Volume Regulation Based on Growing Stock. a. Von Mantel’s* method (chiefly of historical interest but often recommended during the initial stage of organization) is as follows: actual growing stock ,- 4, annual. cut== Annual cut = a Ki ¥ rotation ; Yr fue Ga where r’ is used, this becomes: annual cut mes 2 : a! ce a > ea Basis: on theory Gn = Gr Gh — BI U mots r 3 surplus distributed over = years.” It gives the same results as Hundes- hagens when he finds Gn by the ; method. As Moore** points out, if r’ is used “the yield will be the same as that given in the Austrian formula in which Gn is found by the use of r’ and the > surplus distributed over = years.” But the Wolff formula is preferable to Moore’s although the basic ideas are similar (see § 66-67). Discussion. Since this method does not require a study of increment, it has been widely used by the Forest Service in its rough preliminary regula- tion. The volume to be cut is the keynote instead of the area reproduced or the age of the stand. This formula is faulty in that it assumes normality but is always applied to the actual forest which cannot fail to be abnormal. By this assumption it provides that an amount equal to the present growing stock, surplus or deficit included be cut in half the rotation. The condition of the nes after that time will depend on the amount of increment laid on, a. On stands previous to cutting b. On stands originating after cutting c. On young stands becoming of estimable size after the calculations are made. Ga Howard*** suggests a modification of Von Mantel’s formula toz,— for use Yer 2Ga Ga =insteaad oL —— r Yr ** Ibid. It should be remembered that about twice the normal growing stock is pro- duced by a forest during the rotation; therefore the amount that can be cut is 2 Gn. *** J. of F., Vol. 46, pp. 417-421, August 1, 1920. Von Mantel’s formula, or modifica- tions of it, should primarily be used as a check against other methods as has been ex- plained in the text. The disadvantages in using this formula, or any other formula, may be diminished if there are very frequent recalculations of yield based on a re-estimate of the growing stock. The main difficulty is that frequent estimates, even under intensive conditions in Europe, are a burden of expense. * Masson’s (France) formula is identical only it is written 76 American Forest Regulation in Indian selection forests. This has the same disadvantages as Von Mantel’s but might be a useful idea under certain conditions. It follows that over-stocked forests of over-mature timber will be stripped BERBERA WW eae rk [A | afoeliel sleeves). eal bl) Re cae Rpearaaeh sfarcdieh | Cui aaa BA PAL ihe bilot foal otial acl Teoleslial Tete batiel et | list 1) eee SR RRER RRR IRR eRAARRA RUBE ERERRRABEE eRe eee Se aEne ios Aantal oft ahs] al Sane SAD es a A sl: Gl Te fetes shea erative thal I a] Bie Rae Sagas < Saas Bl cll sel Lali aaa a fob ye | TPs eae a Cur INSCORED S PERS LACRE PER Sea 7s a Gad KA al > co sd Ke a BSc 2 an a Hat SS a Ds ; Be fee Raa Raa Soc ERPs * RvR CREE See 10 20 30 40 50 GO 7oO Xo) ao 100 110 STAND IN CORDS PER ACRE. CUT ACCORDING To VoN MANTEU (UNCORRECTE 0) a CUT WITH CORRECTION FACTOR APPLIED (apPRoxIMAre) Fic. 5. Illustration of the Result of Using a Correction Factor for Von Mantel’s Formula. of all merchantable timber in. half the rotation; this: would probably save waste but might be a serious overcut where the cut was in board feet; the remaining stand might be too small for merchantable sawlogs. Frequent re-estimating and re-calculation of the cut would lessen these dangers. The formula error of exaggerating the cut for an impoverished forest and cutting too little on one that is rich in material can be modified by correction Volume Methods vi! factors. The per cent of the growing stock to be cut, Schaeffer says,* should be higher with 60 cords per acre than with but 20. “To enable an impoverished forest to restock less than the amount indi- cated by the formula should be cut; the per cent cut should be reduced.” This correction factor is systematized by considering that the per cent "a Gator 32 given by the formula (cut =, ) is approximately correct for an empirically 2 = normal stand. Then a table is constructed diminishing the formula per cent 0.1 for stands that are 50 cubic metres less than normal and increasing the per cent 0.1 for each 50 cubic metres above normal. A correction factor was then worked out for 5 soil qualities corresponding to rotations of 120, 140, 160, 180, and 200 years for silver fir. The idea can be applied in the United States, where this formula is used. For a second quality silver fir stand (with a rotation of 140 years) the actual volume to cut by the formula (cor- rected and uncorrected) is illustrated by figure 5. Where r’ (after Wolff) is used instead of r, this means that the merchant- able timber will be cut even more rapidly. Disadvantages: (1) It is inelastic because the surplus or deficit is always taken up in half the rotation; if the cut can be frequently re-calculated upon the basis of new estimates this objection is less serious. (2) With board feet it gives too low** a cut unless 1’ is used. (3) It rests on faulty regulation because it neglects the age and rate of growth of stands and area of cuttings (an area check corrects this to a certain extent). : (4) Only of use in preliminary and crude regulation (even then should be used only with area check). (5) It has not been thoroughly tried out by experience*** (abandoned in Europe). Advantages: 6: eee reer Will gradually lead to the establishment* of the normal Premine ,Stdcke Aud ols. 3. «si adapts the cut to the actual growing stock on BRC TIALG, ya cuce.- as i (2) It is easy to apply since it merely requires the actual growing stock and rotation; it is handy. (3) Of value in preliminary and crude regulation where an approximate volume check is required by law (as on National forests). Illustration. Given: Case (1) Ga= 1,043,000 board feet. Case (2) Ga =JI,304,000 board feet. (This coincides with Gn.) Case (3) Ga =1,565,000 board feet. * Schaeffer, A., Un Correctif a la Methode Masson, Bulletin de la Societe forestierre de Franche—Comte at Belfort, No. 3, 1905. ++ Nb1G.,. Puy Lo. *** Roth, Filibert, Forest Regulation, p. 157. Ssculich, Wol: Dil; *p: 320: 78 American Forest Regulation Where r = 60, r’ = 45 years and the area 60 acres. Then by cut= G2 Case (1) 1:043,000° = 34,766. Yar fa) Case (2) 4:304,000 = 43,466. 30 Case (3) 1:505:000 — co 166, 30 Reference is made to a comparison with the Austrian formula § 85; see also § 66-67. 83. (2) Volume Regulation Based on Increment Alone. Since all forests are abnormal (see Chapter VI), the use of increment alone for purposes of regulation is considered dangerous and inadvisable especially under American conditions. The idea expressed in the Gurnaud* plan is little more than of scientific interest. Gurnaud simply treated the forest as a sample plot and increased or decreased his cut according to the results of past cutting modified by the dictates of current silviculture and market conditions. If the forest was about normal (on an empirical basis), the annual cut was supposed to equal, (Present Ga—former Ga) + (cut between stock takings) (Years between measurements) In applying the allowed yield they endeavored to cut according to the empirical representation of age classes in the ideal selection stand for the species in question. This is of course faulty in that it presumes (unless applied with great judgment) the growth should be the cut—a mistaken ideal. It also necessitates frequent remeasure- ment, a factor which is exceedingly costly in the United States. Furthermore the Gurnaud* idea really goes further and seems to subordinate the modern conceptions of a fixed rotation, of a sustained or fixed yield, or of a normal forest to a flexible method of silviculture that will ‘give the owner the greatest possible growth. The forest is to be intensively managed as a number of sample plots with frequent stock taking (every 5 or 10 years). The cut is to be based on the results obtained over short periods rather than on predictions for several decades. The sus- tained yield and the ideal normal forest will be secured, Biolley claims, by carrying out the aim of getting the largest possible growth with the minimum possible growing stock. The method aims at largely subordinating forest regulation to silviculture. As a method it would rarely be applicable in the United States even under intensive con- ditions; moreover, the method is really an idea or policy rather than a recognized and dis- tinct system of regulation. It is an idea that could be applied with any regulation method and as a matter of fact, is made use of by the best management men in France, when applying the French method of 1883. In fixing the yield the regulator studies the area, volume, age classes, and growth on each lot. Disadvantages: (1) If current increment is taken as the basis of the cut, it will be too small with decadent forests and too great with immature stands. (2) If mean increment is taken (if actual mean is taken for each age class, then it is much too high for young stands and too low for overmature stands) overmature stands will not be reduced, nor immature built up by merely cutting the increment because the present amount and age of timber is not considered. (3) It is expensive and difficult to measure the increment on the entire forest. * Those who wish to study Gurnaud’s ideas on regulation shouktrefer to La Methode du Controle, P. Jacquin, Besancon, 1886, pp. 1-124; also La Methode du Controle a’l exposition universelle de 1889 published in 1890. See Recknagel (ibid.) p. 106 and pp. 74-77; also Studies in French Forestry by T. S. Woolsey, Jr., John Wiley & Sons, 1920, pp. 206 to 243. ** Recknagel, A. B., Forest Working Plans, described (pp. 74-77) as the “Swiss” method regulation by increment alone, but the writer prefers not to introduce this to American forest students. * Biolley already cited, p. 29 and 50. Volume Methods 79 (4) To be at all satisfactory there must be a normal age class distribution which is not found. Advantages: None; but often of interest and value as a rule of thumb check on actual increment under the practical conditions that have prevailed in the forest. Losses through suppression, etc. are shown in the calculation. 84. (3) Volume Regulation Based on Growing Stock and Increment. The stumbling blocks to this class of formula are: (1) How to calculate the normal growing stock; (2) whether to use current or mean annual incre- ment; should this be the normal or actual increment?; (3) the term of years during which the surplus or deficit should be distributed.* The best results in regulation based on growing stock and increment are obtained by the following methods: (1) Calculate the normal growing stock by the yield table method (see TaN or where board feet are used, par. 68-69) where practicable; if not, use S( r2ate oe erbatitute A = SE caes SOG ON: (2) Use actual mean annual increment instead of the current annual. Normal increment should not be used. (3) The surplus or deficit should be distributed according to the condi- tion of the stand and according to the economic possibilities for saving. Rarely, if ever, will the entire rotation* be used as the time within which to distribute a surplus or deficit. The distinctions between the various formulae based on growing stock and increment are illustrated in the table which follows. TaBLe 13. Distinctions Between Formulae Based on Growing Stock and Increment. Name of © Historical Method Reference Formulae Remarks Austrian (as Roth, p. 150 Cut=actual M. Actual mean annual incre- modified by Schlich, p. 314 Wie geal Ga — Gn ment is used and it is as- Von Gutten- Recknagel, + PS Vis sured x is flexible rather burg gr tp? 78 (Most practical adaptation). than the rotation time. Heyer). Roth (Of scientific interest.) Actual current annual is Schlich Cut= actual current An.i used. Not described by Karl’s* (not given) zie Ga — Gn Roth and Schlich. Recknagel, x p. 83 Hundeshagens** Roth, p. 56 (Of scientific interest.) Avoids the calculation of ac- (see Von Schlich, 317 Cit=Gax tual increment. Is inelas- Mantel, p. 75) Recknagel, 7D Gn tic. Basis incorrect. p. 85 * Roth, Filibert, Forest Regulation, p. 151 holds, as does Von Guttenberg, that it fs an error to consider the Austrian formula as spreading the surplus or deficit over an entire rotation. See also Indian Forester, March 1922, pp. 122, 126. ** Those who are interested in the variations between these formulae are referred to _ page or of Forest Working Plans by A. B. Recknagel, but it should be borne in mind that the variations will change according to the period of distributing the surplus or deficit and according to the data assumed as a basis for the example. \ 80 American Forest Regulation Roth (Of scientific interest.) Normal age = half the rota- Schlich Cut = MM. An, i tion. Has the disadvan- Breymann’s** (not given) Normal Age tage of being inelastic. Recknagel, Actual Age p. 86 Roth, p. 154 ea Ga+i—Gn i is the actual M.an. incre- Heyer’s** Schlich, 325 TH oNO 5 ment for rotation. ] (see par. 85). Recknagel, Roth does not distinguish See discussion of Austrian p. 89 the Heyer formula from method where x is vari- the Austrian. able. Of these formulae Heyer’s is the most accurate in theory, but since for- mula methods are approximate, a simpler form is preferred. To give satisfactory results the formula must be based on actual mean annual increment and the surplus never rigidly distributed over the whole rotation. An analysis of the formulae shows that Karl’s can be discarded because it is based on actual current annual increment and possesses no advantages secured by the flexible type of the Austrian formula. Hundes- hagen’s is too inflexible because there is no choice as to decreasing or length- ening the time for the distribution of surplus or deficit. Breymann’s presents too intricate a problem when it comes to determining the actual average age. Heyer’s embodies the same principles as the modified Austrian but no improvement. Therefore but one type of formula is described and illustrated. 85. (a) The Modified Austrian Formula. (Von Guttenberg form; often termed Heyer modification). ‘The formula reads: Annual cut = actual mean annual growth + actual growing stock — normal growing stock — years over which cut is distributed m.a.i. + Ga—Gn Pais Discussion. The increment used is ordinarily the actual mean annual incre- ment. The actual growing stock must be obtained by an inventory of the forest. The normal growing stock is computed preferably from yield tables, i.e., annual cut = or from the formulae 1X 1 or rxi (see $67 to 68). The surplus or deficit is 2 2 distributed in a shorter or longer period according to the dictates of good silvi- culture and good business. If the timber were very over-mature, the tendency would be to reduce the surplus rapidly. If a deficit existed, it should not be made up so quickly that the resulting forest would contain diseased timber. Nor could economy be practiced to such a degree that the yield for local de- pendent industries would be dangerously reduced. Where the actual stock (as in the West) consists largely of mature and overmature timber, the apparent surplus over the theoretical normal stock is not potentially as great as it might appear to be. For when all the over-ripe timber is cut for silvical reasons there is likely to be a deficit in growing stock because there is no middle-aged timber. The Austrian formula gives the same results as Von Mantel’s (see § 82) if the period of distribution (or equalization) is taken at %r.2 With longer Volume Methods 81 or shorter periods of distribution the cut by the Austrian formula will be less or greater than that by Von Mantel’s.* Before using the Austrian formula it is well to bear in mind its peculiarities, (1) Application to a given volume in the forest. The smaller the mean annual increment on this volume, the more overmature the forest and the larger the annual cut because the normal stock depends on increment; the increased cut due to the surplus more than offsets the loss due to the small increment. The result of cutting is a large reduction in the surplus. Hence if actual current increment in old stands were used, heavy cutting is indicated which is obviously good forestry. Conversely, the larger the increment, the smaller the cut, until the forest becomes normal, because a large normal stock is indicated. (2) With a long rotation the cut is diminished because of the increase in the normal stock. Therefore a conservative cutting of the present forest is best secured by adapting as long a rotation as possible. With a longer period for the distribution of the surplus the cut is of course diminished; again, if there is a surplus in the growing stock, then the cut would be increased by a short period of distribution. A conservative cut demands the use of the actual mean annual increment at its culmination as the basis for the normal stock. For a rapid cut use actual current increment (especially in old stands), with a short rotation and a short period for distributing the surplus. Disadvantages: (1) It is highly artificial and tricky, especially with a board foot measure, unless the normal stock is calculated by the formula ae) (see § 66-67) ‘or from yield tables; even then it is subject to error. (2) It assumes that i and Gn remain constant whereas they are contin- ually changing because of natural and artificial causes. This is not as serious an objection as might appear because it is corrected at the time of revision. (3) It ignores area and age. It is an “office” rather than a “field” method of regulation. Advantages: (1) It is elastic because there is wide choice as to the number of years in which to distribute the surplus or deficit. (2) The objective of always trying to approach the normal stock is clearly before the regulator. (3) Adapted to extensive forestry and clearly distinguishes between cap- ital and income, but its value lies chiefly in its use as a check on other methods. 100 X 100 *For example given i=100,r—=100, Ga=7,000, Gn= = 5,000 and if 7,000 — 5,000 ; ve > = 140, while by Von 50 140, an identical figure. The Austrian and Von Mantel give : é Et ; the same results only in case the inaccurate a formula is used to calculate the normal 2 X= 50 years, the Austrian formula works out 50 * 100-++ 7,000 — 50 Mantel we have growing stock. 82 American Forest Regulation Illustrations. Given for a forest of 60 acres: Case (1) Case (2) Case (3) Ga 1,043,000 1,304,000 1,565,000 Gn 1,304,000 1,304,000 1,304,000 me lased 1,003 1,003 1,003 ie 60 60 60 x 50 30 15 It follows that: Case (1), Cut = 60,180 + 1,045,000 == 15503, 000 = 54,960 50 Case (2), Cut = 60,180 + 1:304,000 — 1,304,000 _ 69 185 30 Case '(3); \Cut=i60,180 4 1.505.000 — 1,304,000 _ 77 <8 2] In case (1) there was a deficit of growing stock, so the cut was reduced; in case (2) there was no change because the growing stock was normal; in case (3) there was an excess growing stock, so the allowed cut was largely increased and especially because the excess was to be cut in 15 years. 86. (4) Volume Regulation Based (on Growing Stock and) Size Classes (and Periods). (a) This so-called method* of 1883 as applied to selection forests of tolerant species is as follows: After inventory (by diameter classes), determine the rotation and the corresponding size of tree, then classify the stock in three classes: (1) Old wood, trees more than two-thirds the exploit- able (rotation) size; (2) Average wood, trees less than two-thirds and more than one-third; (3) Young wood, less than one-third (usually not calipered). Where there is a normal (or nearly normal) proportion of old and average wood (see discussion), the cut** equals the volume of the old wood divided by a third of the rotation plus half the annual growth on the old wood class while it is being cut. , ; 87. Discussion of French Method of 1883. The method was designed for selection high forests of tolerant species, where the regeneration could be secured in at least one-third the rotation, and where a sustained yield was important. It is based on the conception that a selection forest, normally constituted, is just like an even-aged forest (where, on equal areas, stands of all ages up to the rotation age are found), except that the various aged trees are intermingled. In the latter case an equal cut is secured by cutting * Based on the original official instructions issued by the French Secretary of Agri- culture and on the Chamonix Working Plan by A. S. Schaeffer. ** Compare this method with the Hufnagl “diameter class method” described by Reck- nagel (ibid.), pp. 100-105; The Hufnagl method (Variation I) is: Annual cut = volume ‘ : it ‘ Pee i oy of trees or of diameter classes — years and over, plus increment thereof in — years. 2 4 Recknagel gives an interesting example of (Variation 2) where the trees have been grouped by 3-inch classes with the basis data (for each class) of volume per tree, average number of trees per acre, and years required to grow from one class to the next (and “average age of the average tree in each diameter class). For each class the cut is equal to volume of class X number of trees per acre. The yield for all classes can then be increased or decreased according to the surplus or deficit in the growing stock. According to Recknagel’s example the surplus is reduced in one cutting cycle, which is made equal to the number of years to grow to the highest diameter class from the preceding class. For more complete discussion see Recknagel. Volume Methods 83 each year areas of the same size and productivity. But in the selection forest the cutting must remove only ripe trees here and there over the entire area without any comparison of surface. ‘Therefore, in this case volume must be substituted for surface. The method is based on the assumption (see diagram) that the volume of the old wood is 5 and the volume of the average wood 3 the total merchant- able volume, it being presumed that the young wood is unmerchantable. t 2 Q 6 So Sees ~ ” 3) ou a: % 0 Q = Ss ef ~ ne ” oi Sic Yo % Fé ToTat MNERCHANTABLE According to the French Secretary of Agriculture, the data furnished by research on the mean annual rate of growth of high forests shows that this relationship is approximately as 5 is to 3. Therefore whenever in a selection forest the volume of the old wood and the average wood is as 5 is to 3, it can be taken for granted that these two groups are similar to the first two periodic blocks of a high forest. To demonstrate that the volume covering the two first periodic blocks of a regular high forest (divided into three periodic blocks) are about as 5 is to 3, which represents their average age respectively, it suffices to note that the trees of the second periodic block are the average wood, which has arrived at a state where the annual growth is very uniform and just about equal to the average of the stand and at a period when it is safe to figure the future growth as equal to the past average. Suppose a high forest with a 150-year rotation were divided into three periods of 50 years each. The average age of the first (old wood) and second (average wood) periodic blocks will be 125 and 75 years and will be separated by a length of time equal to a period of 50 years. In admitting that the future growth will be equal to the average growth, the volume of the 125-year wood will be equal to that of the 75-year old wood increased by an amount 84 American Forest Regulation equal to 50 times the annual growth. Then if we designate the volume of the 75-year old wood as 3, the 125-year old volume will be 3 + os ” = 100 bd. ft. per year. 50 The specific difference in management caused by the shorter cutting cycle can be further illustrated. ! With a cycle of 10 years instead of 50 years, the area cut over annually would be * We must bear in mind that the French method of 1883 is applied to selection forests of silver fir and spruce. They would never use the method for pine stands with groups of even-aged trees, nor would they calculate ahead for more than 20 to 30 years. They are apt to discard refinements as immaterial to the result. ' T.7Ss Weis We must also bear in mind that the reason that they would not do so is the possi- bility of a short cutting cycle, rather than the difference in the silvicultural system. Fi FG, | Application of Regulation 133 0,000 acres instead of 4,000 acres, or 1/10 of the total area of 200,000 acres. The total cut by Munger’s figures is 100 bd. ft. X 200,000 acres or 20,000,000 bd. ft. Concentrated on 20,000 acres, the annual cut per acre on the cutting area only is but 1,000 instead ‘of 5,000 bd. ft. which means that only the trees which have fully matured need to be cut, and there is no felling reserve worth mentioning. The acre is cut 5 times in 50 years, yielding 1,000 bd. ft. at each cutting. But with a cutting cycle of 50 years, this felling reserve and the growth which takes place during the cycle are the factors which permit of a cut of 5,000 instead of 1,000 bd. ft. per acre and since it is evident ‘that but 6,500 bd. ft. per acre is present on the area as a whole (2,500 bd. ft. of which is mature), the assumption of a cut equal to 55 per cent of this stand for the cycle would not do. To get 100 bd. ft. per acre, 77 per cent must be cut; or See of the stand,—and 77 per cent can be cut, since it is cut annually on an area which has put on ‘50 years’ growth and contains actually 9,000 bd. ft. per acre, not 6,500 bd. ft. xJo Ga ce ‘cutting cycle, for growth must here be recognized as a material factor in the cut. Need for Determining Condition of Normality. The relation of volumes, as % to 5% ‘assumed by the French method of 1883, is not the relation actually existing in the forest, mor even that assumed to exist after one cutting cycle, but it is the theoretically calculated normal relation which should exist in a forest which has a normal form, Tegardless of the density or degree of stocking of each age class,—a normal arrange- ment on a basis of empirical stocking. The real work of regulation is to secure this relation in the actual stand, and this will be our problem in the second cycle and ‘thereafter. But we must first ascertain as did the French, what is the normal pro- portion of volumes to be striven for, and what actual proportions exist in the forest. This calls for the separation of age classes in the forest, on the basis of age, area occupied, and volume produced or yield per acre, regardless of whether this forest is jall-aged or even-aged in form. This same information is needed, not merely for a ‘continuance of regulation after the surplus is cut, but for the initial determination of the veutting cycle, and of the annual cut. For these reasons, the formula, annual cut = cannot be used in the second 138. Summary of Principles. Tosum up: a. Unless the species consti- tuting the main volume of the stand are merchantable, regulation of the cut in the first cycle is preliminary in form and confined to the valuable mer- chantable percentage, which should be treated if possible for a sustained yield, based on growth,—but this cannot always be done. b. When the main yield becomes merchantable and accessible, the first cutting cycle is transitional, involving the creation of a felling reserve, and is usually long, even up to %r years. c. Although the length of the period must be based on studies of growth on cutover lands, the amount of the cut in the first cutting cycle may for the present and in absence of proper growth data be fixed on the basis that the loss will balance growth in the virgin stands previous to cutting. The annual cut of timber now mature then becomes X% Ga cc! | d. Current growth per year on the stand left per acre after cutting, if calculated to include the total volume of trees maturing or becoming mer- chantable, is sometimes assumed to indicate the sustained annual cut. But this assumes a normal forest, which does not exist in fact. We need to know the composition and yield per acre of the forest by 134 American Forest Regulation separate age classes, in order, first, to determine what is a normal forest, second, what is a sustained yield, third, what steps should be taken to attai these objects. After determining the length of the initial cutting cycle, and the per cen of the stand to cut, the general method of regulation, applicable to American forests is, 1. The annual cut, during the first or transitional felling cycles should be a. X per cent of the present merchantable volume, which will consti- tute the exploitable age or size classes, which should be set a r— Vcc years. e b. Plus the net growth in volume on these stands before cutting. (total growth minus decadence), which is % the growth in cc years. c. Plus % the total growth for cc years of the remaining stands in the forest including all age classes, which is equivalent to the volume and ¥% the growth for cc years on % of the stands which would mature during this period cc, and is equal to all stands now between r— %cc and r—cc years. 2. The cut during the second cutting cycle should be, a. The felling reserve, which is the other half of the volume anc growth of the stands maturing during cutting cycle, b. Plus an additional quantity made up from the growth of the forest during this period cc and represented by growth during this cycle on the felling reserve plus the maturing of stands into the exploitable class and growth thereon before cutting. In a normal forest this : would give a total approximately equal to the volume of the felling reserve. Together, these elements equal the volume at beginning of cycle, of stands between r and r—cc years, plus % the growtk during the cycle. 3. The maintenance, of the cut in subsequent cycles therefore depends or whether the forest, after the first cutting cycle, is normal in distribution 0:3 age classes. 4. Regulation of the annual cut as between cutting cycles is impossible without a knowledge of the composition of the forest with respect to the area, age and volume of each age class, and a yield table based on empirica average yields for the forest unit. It is best accomplished by a. Ability to modify or reduce the per cent of the cut in the first cutting cycle and thus shorten the cycle and hold over the surplus to the second cycle. b. Ability to reduce the total annual cut from the forest in case oi a long first cutting cycle so as to permit the accumulation of a large cut per acre in the succeeding cycle. Ability to predict the cut of immature timber and the proportiona area and per cent of the rotation which it will occupy. 139. Separation of the Forest into Age Classes. The basis of separatior of the stands comprising a working group is fundamentally age ;—since the time required by growth will eventually govern the rate of cutting. In forests naturally composed of even-aged stands, which can be mapped and whose average age is easily determined, age will be directly ascertained by cutting Application of Regulation 135 into sample trees, and the age classes can be separated by area and by volume for the forest during the forest survey. The separation of age classes in the many-aged form of forest cannot be made by area mapping, but must be correlated with average diameter—a principle sanctioned by the French in 1883 as the basis of their method of regulating many-aged forests.* Need for Empirical Yield Table. Where age and yield per acre can be used, the basis of regulation becomes the yield table giving volume per acre at different ages. But in the construction of this table, which is by selection of plots, it is neither possible nor necessary to attempt to secure average stands or yields, which will represent the empirical or actual condition of the forest. Yet this latter data is what is required rather than selected yields which represent a higher average of stocking, approaching “normality.” Determination of a Reduction Per Cent. The principle which must be applied to solve this problem is to determine the relation of the volumes of the different age classes in the forest to the corresponding volumes for the same ages in the yield table, on the basis of equal areas. On this basis a reduction per cent is obtained and the yield of the age classes in the forest can then be gauged by the yield table after reducing this table to the empirical standard by applying this reduction per cent. If for instance an age class is now but 50 per cent of normal density its future yield will be computed at 50 per cent of the yield shown in the normal table. This basis is extremely conservative, since it is well known that sparsely stocked stands tend to close up with increasing age. There are several variations in the methods of applying this principle, but in some form it must be worked out for every forest on which regulation of yield is contemplated. The volume per acre of a given age class is a function primarily of age, and secondly of density of stocking. The three factors which must be determined, then, are age, area and volume. In the yield table, the normal relation of these three factors is shown, areas being stand- ardized as one acre. 140. Summary of Possible Conditions. (1) For Even-aged Mapped Areas. The different conditions encountered may be summed up as follows: Problem rt. Even-aged mapped areas. Age, volume and area of each age class in the forest is directly ascertained. Usually true of regulated forests managed by clear cutting or shelterwood system, and can be found for sprout cuttings, or forest originating on burns. Solution. Divide the yield per acre of the age class by the yield from table. This gives the reduction per cent, separately for each age class, by which its future yield can be predicted by applying this per cent to the yields in the table for future years. For stands of less than merchantable age, this per cent of normality must be directly estimated by inspection, based on silvicultural knowledge of the stand.** For lodgepole pine, this normality per cent is reduced by overstock- ing a greater degree than by understocking. * Refer to § 87-88. ** Utilization and Management of Lodgepole Pine in the Rocky Mountains by D. T. ‘Mason, Bul. 234 U. S. Dept. Agr., Page 36, Table 18. 136 American Forest Regulation (2) For Even-aged Stands whose Volumes but not Areas are Known. Problem 2. Age and volume of each age class can be found. The are occupied is not separately mapped, but the total area occupied is obtaine for all age classes. Solution. This problem is easily soluble if it can be assumed that an average reduction per cent, applying equally to all age classes, an serv the purposes of regulation, as follows: 1. Divide the volume of each age class by the yield of one acre of the given age, from the yield table. This gives the area which would be require¢ by the age class if the stand were fully or 100 per cent stocked. 2. Obtain the total of fully or roo per cent stocked areas by adding together the areas of all merchantable age classes. 3. By comparing this area with the total area actually occupied by the sum of the age classes the density or reduction per cent would be obtained But this process disregards actual silvicultural conditions and young growth It is far preferable to 4. Subtract from the total area the area stocked with young growth saplings, poles and seedlings established,—the residue is the area stockec with merchantable timber. Divide the “fully stocked” net area obtained a; above, by this net area stocked with merchantable timber. This gives the density of stocking of the age classes whose volume can be measured. This per cent is assumed to apply equally to all these merchantable age classes 5. If the area “fully or 100 per cent stocked” thus obtained for eacl age class is taken as the basis, and is divided by the density per cent, ther the area in acres theoretically occupied by each age class of merchantabl timber may be found. This method of solution fulfills all practical condition: of regulation. 141. Illustration from Tusayan National Forest. The volume of this stand has beet previously separated into veterans, mature, and blackjack, but the areas cannot be separated directly in the field. Net area in timber, original growth, 52,004 acres. Deducted for saplings and seedlings, 13,002 acres—25 per cent. Deducted for poles, 6,500 acres—I2¥% per cent. Net area occupied by merchantable timber, 32,502 acres. Determination of the reduction per cent, or factor of density. Yield per acre Area fully or Per cent of total from yield table 100 per cent area in each Age class Age years ft. B.M. stocked* acres age class Veteran 300 18,200 8,345 58.3 Mature 200 25,300 1,745 12.2 Blackjack 100 11,300 4,211 20.5 Total fully stocked 14,301 Reduction or density per cent 14301 _ 44 per cent 32502 Area in each age class. Ratio 1° = 2.2727 44 * obtained by dividing the volume in each age class in the forest by the yield shown in column 2. Application of Regulation 137 Veterans 8,345 X 2.2727 = 18,966 acres Mature 1745 oe 22727, 3.906, acres Blackjack AAI G2 2727 — 1O'S70%acres Poles 6,500 acres Saplings and seedlings 13,002 acres Total area 52,004 acres To predict the yield of these age classes, whose area and age we now have, the yield table must be reduced in this instance to 44 per cent of its original value. This assumes that stands now showing a density of 44 per cent of normal will continue to maintain this relation or better, and that if better the surplus is not considered. ; The yield table so obtained is a true empirical or actual average yield, adapted to the conditions of the forest or unit as a whole or to the type or working unit or group for which it was constructed. 142. (3) For Many-aged Stands. Problem 3. Volume and diameter are known but age classes cannot be directly determined. This is the typical form of problem for many-aged forests or forests in which the age classes are impossible of separation by area. The average age of different age classes is impossible of determination directly. Yet since age and the separation of age classes are fundamental to regulation, some means of separation and determi- nation must be found to permit of any systematic regulation whatever. Correlation of Diameter and Age. Solution. Diameters of the trees in the stands are readily determined. Diameter is a rough indication of the age of average trees. By determining the average relation between diameter and age, whether this be for total age or merely for current growth for a lesser period, the time factor (age) is supplied and the growth rate of the stand may be measured. The simplest principle of separation is that by diameter classes or groups. The rate of diameter growth is measured on a large number of trees to elim- inate individual variations. The curve of growth, to be accurate, should be actually based on diameter and not on age. The resultant table should show the average age of treesgof each diameter class. Owing to the period of suppression common to trees of tolerant species growing in many-aged forests, the absolute age of such trees is valueless for purposes of regulation, since the individual trees, if they had the benefit of sunlight or freedom from suppression, would mature without this period of delayed development. For this reason, one of two modifications are usually made in this curve—either the juvenile period of growth is omitted, and the table indicates the number of years it requires for trees of given sizes to grow to the next larger size,—or else if the total age is shown, this juvenile period is taken from trees which have not been suppressed. Function of the Yield Table. The yields per acre at different ages are now based primarily upon the sizes of the trees, their average volumes, and the number of trees of the given size which would stand on one acre of ground. The same relation as before exists between the normal or well stocked forest and the average or empirical forest. The yields for a normal or full stocking at different ages must be found, in the form of a yield table, in order to determine the normal relation or proportion existing between volumes on one acre at different ages, so that this relation or percentage of increase 138 American Forest Regulation from decade to decade, which is the law of growth of the stand, may then b applied to determine the actual density of the forest in question, and t predict the yields of existing stands. For instance, in the French method of 1883 the relation of 4 to ¥% whic it was stated should exist between stands respectively over %r in age, an between 2% and %r, was first found for an assumed “normal” series of age classes, in which the volume of the stand was calculated for the normal acre, and the average growth relation between the two groups roughly determined ($87). The establishment of this same relation is sought in the actual forest—its existence is the proof of empirical normality, independent of actual density. Derivation of the Normal Yield Table. From Crown Spread. This “normal” yield table, from which the percentage or proportional relation of stands of different ages or average sizes can be found may be worked out for our conditions on a sound basis in one of two ways, First, the average growing space demanded by trees of different diameters may be found. Crown spread is almost always directly related to diameter, and is a direct indication in turn of the space required by a tree. If the proportional space per tree, for trees of different diameters, can be found, thus giving a curve of normal relations between mwumber of trees per acre for different diameters, it makes no difference whether on the whole this curve gives too many trees provided the proportion is correct as between classes, for it is as easy to reduce a table giving 110 per cent of the “normal” number, to 60 per cent as it is to reduce one giving 9o per cent, to 60 per cent. The volume of trees of these dimen- sions gives the normal yields per acre, while the age is taken from the average diameter. 143. Illustration—from “Yellow Poplar in Tennessee” by W. W. Ashe, Bulletin ro C State Geological Survey: Taste 14. Number of trees in different diameter classes per acre, required to obtain a continuous yield from a fully stocked group selection stahd of pure poplar. Approximate per cent of each Number of trees per acre diameter class which should Diameter classes. Inches onaverage quality site exist in a normal stand 2-4 280 54 5-8 151 30 Q-I2 57 Il 13-16 19 4 17-20 5 I above 20 I .30 513 Ashe then states, “Since this table is based on fully stocked pure stands, it is neces- sary in the consideration of a mixed stand to ascertain the average number of trees of the different diameter classes per acre. The relation of this number in each diameter class to the corresponding table number gives the proportional annual yield which is to: be expected from this diameter class when mature, that is when larger than 20 inches.” If in place of 19 trees to the acre in the 13 to 16 inch diameter class there were 6 trees, the propurtion of stocking would be 6/19 as far as this diameter class is concerned. The annual yield per acre from a fully stocked stand is 430 board feet, | F , | . i Application of Regulation 139 ieonsequently the annual yield with the proportion of Sioeines given would be 16/19 X 430 = 135 ft. In this illustration, application of the principle of proportion or reduction per cent between a so-called normal stand and yield table and the actual forest is based on number determined directly by crown spread. The real difficulty in this method lies in forests containing decadent stands of over- mature timber, for here, not only does the space required by an old tree exceed the propotition indicated by its crown as compared to a young tree, but the stand is losing its grip and is becoming open by the death of individuals. From Plots. For these reasons, the second method proposed below is preferable for such forests. This consists of actually laying out plots, in stands composed of trees of as nearly as possible the same size class, and determining on an area basis, which takes into account all the silvicultural factors affecting the stand, the number of trees on the acre and their average size and volume, and from this size, the age of the stand as in the first method. Once the table giving number of trees per acre for a normal stand is found for different ages, the results can be used to predict the yields even of mixed stands of hardwoods. In some form or other, this principle must always be used, and will serve as a means of applying to the exact conditions of stocking in the forest the laws of growth as ascertained by a special study of selected stands and trees. In the illustration given, the proportion between the number of trees of different diameters is the basis of comparison. In even-aged stands, the direct proportion between volumes is used.. But the final result in each case is an empirical yield table adapted to the degree of stocking of the forest unit to be regulated. 144. A System of Regulation of Yield, for Many-aged or Selection Forests. Based on Diameters and Diameter Growth. Preliminary in character, and dis- pensing with the yield table. Data Needed. ‘The following data is needed: Stand table showing the number of trees and volume of each diameter class on the average acre in the forest. Table of growth of trees of different diameters, preferably showing number of years required to grow one inch. Volume table, based on diameter, applicable to the site class or average heights for the unit. The principle to be applied is explained in paragraph 127. A cutting cycle is determined on, which bears a reasonable relation to the rotation, and conforms with the required conditions of logging and silviculture. The min- imum exploitable size or diameter is fixed, which conforms to those conditions. The cut for the first cycle will include all trees above this size with % their growth during the cycle plus a volume equal to all trees in a diameter group below this size, whose scope coincides with a period equal to % the cutting cycle, to which % the growth on these trees for the cycle is added. 145. Illustration—with scattered shortleaf and loblolly pine growing with mixed hardwoods. (Southern States.) Cutting Cycle. On basis of logging conditions, condition of forest with respect to distribution of age classes, and silvicultural needs, the per cent of the stand to remove in first cutting cycle was set at 83 per cent and the minimum exploitable diameter limit which this called for in the cut, was 15 inches. . 140 American Forest Regulation . On basis of rate of growth of the trees in diameter, stand per acre desired on retur cut, and number of years required to produce this yield from the existing forest, th length of the cutting cycle was fixed at 20 years. Calculation of the Possible Cut—Calculation of Cut in First 20-Year Cycle. Averag growth in diameter for 2 the period, or 10 years, 2.5 inches. Hence, trees maturing and cut within period of 20 years, are those from 12.5 to 15 inches in diameter. Volume or trees above 15 inches 22% 2.6 Wie ee ee oe 1,408 M. bd. ft. Growth in 20 years (total growth less 15 per cent fOr: LOSSES). 4 vic cassie die wk tee is Aen Ae tele weet 403 M. bd. ft. ia tiotall Suowth: AS: City 4; a4 «dct vated een ee nc & aoe ee ae 201 M. bd. ft. Volumevof trees from, m2'5, to 05 inches). ......saseee ae eee 147 M. bd. ft. Growth in 20 years on these trees .............. 248 M. bd. ft Pe PLOW ti 1S CLUE Lhd. chin 01s-c'e uc Rie eee ee re arate cin hohe tc eee 124 M. bd. ft. Total to:cut within 2p yearses: fils kueineiauee. lathe OM 1,880 M. bd. ft. Or, total volume of all trees above 12.5 inches ............... 1,555 M. bd. ft. a er OW ell itive 20, NGAUS. 6. s x6-<. see ites testes akon em meee ie clea ae eae ead 325 M. bd. ft. Mota) Cul idee cS as <8 6-5 aa eae ee eee 1,880 M. bd. ft. Calculation of Cut in Second Period of 20 Years. During this period, the age class from 12.5 inches downward is to be cut. The diameter group includes 20 years growth. If the rate of 5 inches in 20 years holds good, this group embraces trees now 7.5 to 12.5 inches in diameter. Twenty years growth during the first period brings this group above 12.5 inches. The volume thus maturing is that of the original group, plus 20 years growth, minus the losses occurring during the period. With the same minimum exploitable diameter as before, namely, 15 inches, this entire group will be cut during the next 20-year cycle, plus % the growth for this period. Volume, at end of period, of trees then above 12.5 inches, being the present volume of trees 7.5 to 12.5 inches, plus net growth TORIZOVeana fees ie eo nee SOR on ee ne 790 M. bd. ft. Growth for mext?20.yGarss =. :ee ona ct aac 400 M. bd. ft. Ya, SLOW EN, Clit Ienex t: DETIOd vaste aoe sus aioe Eee 200 M. bd. ft. Dotal*cutttos-second: period seeses ac.) oe eee Oe 990 M. bd. ft. This general method is not based on cutting a definite number of trees (as in India for teak), but upon the volume produced by the existing forest, computed as usual by knowing the number and size of the trees in the forest. 146. Factor of Loss of Numbers. The weak point in the method is the prediction of growth, based on number of trees which will survive. The actual net growth in any forest is the difference in volume of the separate age Classes, found by comparing the merchantable volume of the live trees at one period with those of a succeeding period. A “normal” acre or stand table would help to indicate the progressive reduction in numbers with age. The improvement which this method evidently needs is the application of a yield table or guide in determining, at least, the loss in numbers, instead of having to guess at this vital factor. (See Ashe’s illustration, § 143.) Another great difference between forests under intensive management and primeval forests being brought under regulation is that in the former, the trees which normally die will be cut instead as thinnings or salvaged and are included in the yield, while in the latter, their volume at the beginning of the period is a net reduction from the total increase and is lost. Application of Regulation 141 When it is necessary to predict this growth by measurement of growth per tree, applied to the total number of trees, as in the above example, the loss of trees must be offset against this growth in volume. In the example given, for lack of data, this loss was arrived at rather arbitrarily by deducting 15 per cent of the final volume as lost during the 20 year period, this amount being 44 per cent of the assumed or indicated total growth had all the trees _ survived. The diminution in number of trees, by diameter classes, as indi- cated in a stand table or a normal acre, would show the average loss in a normal many-aged forest in which no cutting whatever was done, and all trees eventually disappeared. In forests cut over at intervals, this rate of loss of trees is reduced materially. Graves, in the “Adirondack Spruce” claimed that on cutover land it could be ignored altogether. As it stands, the true growth realized depends, (a) upon the effect of cutting on the rate of survival of trees left after cutting, as well as upon their increased growth. . (b) upon the ability of the forester to secure or salvage the trees which would otherwise be lost. This is largely a function of the conditions which permit of a short cutting cycle, the probability of salvage increasing as the cycle shortens. The true rate and amount of growth, nied predicted from growth of trees, will fall somewhere between that indicated by survival of all trees, and that indicated by the diminishing curve of numbers of trees per acre based on diameter. Only a careful study of the composition of the forest with respect to growth will give accurate knowledge of this factor. In India it is approx- imated by guess based on the judgment and silvicultural knowledge of the forester. This data, taken from an actual stand on Henry Hardtner’s forest at Urania, Louisiana, brings out some of the difficulties in actually bridging the gap between theory and practice in securing sustained yield on a forest not now under regulation. This stand had been logged once, removing large mature pines. The cutting cycle suggested is therefore in effect a second cycle—the first cut was to about 17 or 18 inches. In spite of the conservative (high) 15 inch limit, leaving 17 per cent of timber now merchantable, the second 20 year cycle gives a prospective sustained yield of approximately 50 per cent of that in the first cycle. 147. Determining of Normality. To regulate or equalize the cut for these two cycles, which is evidently abnormal, a comparison could be made between the stands required for a normal forest and those in the actual forest. Data for this is lacking in the illustration. Granting that the 20 year cycle is the proper subdivision or period of the rotation, which for this forest is 80 years, we have four age groups of 20 years each. The average age of the mer- chantable timber in the second cutting cycle might be set at r—% ce or 70 years, and the cutting age r or 80 years ($127). The approximate diameters are respectively: for O~-20 years 0-4” for 21-40 years 5-9” for 41-60 years IO-15” over 60 years 16” and over. 142 American Forest Regulation The normality of the stand, if based on the 20 year cutting cycle to permit the maximum cut per cent per acre, would be determined by the volume available for cutting in the successive periods, and not as in the French system of 1883 upon the present volume. Now, in order to confine the cutting during the first cycle to trees now over . 60 years of age, or falling in the last period, the minimum exploitable age must be set at 70 years, and the diameter corresponding to this mark the minimum limit of cutting. This, by the relations explained in § 127 will result in cutting a volume equivalent to that of the 60 to 80 year 2nd class only, and will conform to a rotation of 80 years, reduce the cut in the first cycle by raising the diameter, and tend to equalize the cut from the first and second cycles. This method consists merely in adopting a short cutting cycle and a long rotation sifmultaneously. But the same general result can be obtained with a long cutting cycle, provided the cut is actually prolonged to last throughout the cycle, and does not proceed to remove all the available timber within a shorter period. This means reducing the amount of the annual cut, and acreage cut over annually, to the proper proportion of the total available for the cycle. The same prin- ciples will apply in determining ,the annual cut as were illustrated in the above example. 148. Overcutting. The securing of a sustained yield and the mere prolonging* of the cut are two different things. The latter is accomplished (as in the above illustration) if the second cut can begin in the year when the first cut terminates. But the cut in the second period is but 50 per cent of that in the first period (and in Munger’s illustration, 42 per cent). The drop in production is partly due to the removal of an actual surplus stock accumu- lated by overmaturity. But it may also indicate actual overcutting.** For instance, in each of two or three successive cycles, the diameter limit may be lowered, thus holding up the apparent yield but at the expense of the forest capital which is being depleted. The level of sustained production must obviously be determined—a short cutting cycle based on supplementary cutting from forest capital is obviously an absurdity—for the “surplus” created by successively heavier per cents of cutting per acre in effect indicates succes- sively longer periods before the recovery of the forest or a second cut on the same area, and demands successively larger present quantities of growing stock or surplus if the cut is to continue throughout this cutting cycle. In mixed forests the successive cutting of different species as they become mer- chantable has frequently prolonged the ordinary logging operations over two or three cutting cycles, without in any way providing for a sustained yield in the end. The usual result of such overcutting is a final clean cut and abandonment of the enterprise. * Judging from data submitted to a bond house by a well known paper company such concerns, through vitally concerned with a sustained yield, are merely prolonging the cit.< D3-S: WJ ** Tt is virtually paying unearned dividends (a) out of surplus so long as there is excess growing stock but (b) out of capital when this surplus stock is disposed of; (a) is good business while (b) is usually contrary to sound business principles. T. S. W., Jr. Application of Regulation 143 In the above illustration, a reduction to 50 per cent of the first cut, on a 15 inch cutting limit, may permit of continuing the cut every 20 years, on this reduced basis. Or the forest may be capable of a sustained output exceeding this figure. This would be the case if the 40 to 60 year age class, 10 to 15 inches in diameter on which the cut and prediction of yield is based, were deficient in rtumbers. Here again is where the normal acre, showing distribution of numbers, would serve as an indication. 149. Method of Regulating Yield. To regulate or better distribute such a yield, the volume of the cut per year in the first period must be reduced, thus carrying over some of the surplus to the second period. This can be done by raising the diameter limit of cutting during this period, by one or more mches, thus shifting a portion of the cut to the second period. Beyond the first two periods, the distribution of age classes and regulation of the cut by this method is not feasible; nor would it be advisable. The numerical representation of trees required is subject to great reduction by suppression and other natural losses. Inspection is about as reliable as counting to determine the success of reproduction and degree of stocking by poles and saplings, and since the trees have no merchantable volume they are seldom tallied. Summary. For the regulation of many-aged selection forests, where it is impossible to determine age of stands from age of individual trees, age of stands must be determined from diameter of trees, by depending on the general laws of relation between diameter and age for trees. The cutting limit can correspond to a given diameter, and the volume available for cutting in the first cycle to the volume above this diameter, plus the volume of all trees which would reach this diameter in 1% the cutting cycle, plus % the growth on this total volume (§ 127). The cut in the second cycle will be equal to the volume of timber which at that time has reached the same diameter limit as indicated above, namely, a diameter representing an age 1% cc years less than that of the cutting limit. 150. Comparison with French System of 1883. The annual cut can be sustained if necessary at a regular volume by raising or lowering the diameter limit* of cutting, based on comparison of yields thus secured in the two cutting cycles. A comparison of this general method with that of the French system of 1883 shows that this latter method pays no attention to the quantity or enumeration of growing stock of the first third of the rotation leaving this to silvicultural practice, being assured it is probably sufficient (with the silver fir and spruce forests to which it is usually applied. T. S. W., Jr.). The actual stand table is completed for the entire merchantable stand. This is comparatively simple for us to secure, by assembling a stand table for the portion tallied, and expressing it as applying to the average acre. It is not necessary to tally every tree, either for estimating volume, or securing distribution of * The student of course must recognize the silvical disadvantage of strictly adhering to a rigid diameter limit; in practice mature trees below the limit are cut and young trees above the limit retained. 144 American Forest Regulation diameters. The percentage relation taken from a stand table prepared on a portion of the area will give this for the whole. The French, by a crude and inaccurate assumption (see discuSsion in § 87) arrive at the conclusion that if the second third of the area or age classes has three units of volume, the same stand in the third period should have five. This is based on the Von Mantel’s principle that mean and current growth coincide throughout the rotation, hence the growing stock has the form shown below and the removal of the entire volume on the last third of the area and rotation is possible in %r years. In practice, the volume of the upper third of the stock grows to the age of the rotation before it is cut, due to the short cutting cycle. Protests have been voiced against some of the methods here discussed for American regulation because said methods are not based on accurate math- ematical data and principles but “pass from one assumption to another until the basis of accuracy is completely destroyed.” If anything 1s more appar- ently inaccurate, and based on ranker assumption than this French method of 1883 it has not yet been found, yet it has worked successfully for thirty- eight years, and furnished a workable solution for the problem of regulation of many-aged forests.* Improvements Possible for American Application. Instead of basing the size or age classes upon the assumption that diameter growth is practically uni- form, and that trees of % the final average size required in the rotation are also % the age,—the same proportion holding for ?74,—the actual rela- tions may be worked out from local growth studies. When the fundamental relations between size and age are established, the relations which should *Tt has been successful because there is frequent stock taking, because it has been applied by experienced foresters, and because there is good silvicultural practice in the forest with due regard to a proper distribution of size classes (without unnecessary refinements). T.S. W., Jr. Application of Regulation 145 exist between the volumes of the different age groups or classes can be obtained by these studies and the construction of normal acres. This period Y%rin the French system is independent of the cutting cycle and felling reserve. Here as repeatedly pointed out, the latter factors are too great to be ignored and the form and volume of the growing stock required must be computed with respect to the felling series. We cannot import a method even as simple and crude as this, without adapting it to our forest and economic conditions. The desire of American foresters for mathematical accuracy born in a large part from the lack of opportunity for the practical application of growth problems, can still be gratified to a considerable extent without splitting too many hairs. The progress of the forest towards normality of stocking, obtained by the French through conservative cutting, and by their curves showing the rela- tion of the number of trees per acre in actual versus normal forest, will be seriously delayed here by the removal of excess overmature stock, but can be secured by raising the diameter limit of cutting, where shorter cycles are possible, or by extending the length of the cutting cycle when the cut per acre cannot be reduced because of danger of blowdown or other silvicultural factors. Determining the Allowed Cut. Sustained yield in many-aged forests means, finally, the determination of the “allowed cut” or actual production per year, and the adjustment of the cut to leave the forest in shape to produce this, The reason for success with the method of 1883 is that the indicated annual cut, by the basis proposed, is practically certain to be somewhat, but not too much, less than the growth; second, it effects a removal of surplus large stock, or its conservation as needed, and third, it increases only as the forest becomes more densely stocked through better silviculture. Until our over- mature and decadent stock is removed, conservative cutting should be based on cutting the smallest possible per cent of the standing timber per acre, and the largest possible cut per year which will enable us to cover the forest in one cutting cycle, which by the above considerations would be as short as possible. At best we will be forced to adopt long cycles on National Forests, where regulation is feasible. The stock needs reduction, and the worst problem is to secure better distribution of age classes or prevent the still further disturbance, by overcutting, of such distribution as may already exist. 151. Summary of Distinctive Characteristics of American Regulation. The distinctive features of the method proposed, as applicable to all forms of forests in America, are: 1. A period for regulation of yield, which is based upon and coincides with a cutting cycle. This may give place later to periods exceeding a cutting cycle in length (provided the cutting cycles can be shortened so as to become a negligible factor), but never to be shorter than the required cutting cycle. 2. The length of the cutting cycle to be the governing factor in determin- ing the regulation of the cut and to be based upon the existing conditions, forest, and economic. | 3. Regulation of the annual cut to be effected by lengthening or shortening 146 American Forest Regulation the initial or transition cutting cycle, corresponding to increase or decrease in the per cent of the stand per acre taken in the first cut. 4. The amount of the annual cut to depend upon the cutting cycle, present volume, per cent to cut, growth of old stands and inclusion of the maturing crops of young timber entering the exploitable class within the cycle. 5. The result of the first cutting cycle to be the establishment of a felling reserve and cutting series of normal arrangement for continuance of the cut in the second cycle. 6. Regulation of yield to be based on the use of a yield table and reduction per cent, the separation of age classes in the forest, and the prediction of empirical or actual growth, including decadence, on the age classes as they exist in the forest. The last requirement is so obviously in keeping with universal practice in forestry that only the assumed difhculties and expense of obtaining the required data has held back the science of regulation on our National Forests, and at present, the tendency is to go ahead at once with whatever data is available, to formulate some basis of regulation wherever it is needed. 152. Quiz. Why are cutting cycles for mixed stands preliminary? Why is a study of growth essential? When does growth balance decadence? Explain formula cited in § 134. Can the growth of mature timber be neglected in a long cutting cycle? Can the length of cutting cycle be guessed at? Discuss Munger formula; felling reserve. Why must age classes be analyzed? What is the danger of using growth per cent? Why must condition of normality be determined? Explain how empirical yield tables are necessary in regulation. How is a “reduction per cent” obtained for even-aged areas where mapped, and where areas are not separated? In all-aged stands how is diameter and age correlated? How is normal yield table derived from crown spread? from plots? How can the yield table be dispensed with? Explain a preliminary system of yield regulation for selection forests. What data is needed? Discuss complication of loss of numbers, normality, overcutting. Compare this method with French system of 1883. Enumerate essential distinctive characteristics of “American Regulation.” CHAP LER Xbb THE PROBLEM OF SUSTAINED YIELD 153. The Ultimate Problem—Sustained Yield. Owing to the importance of the preliminary and transition periods and the unavoidable disturbance of the forest capital and postponement of the creation of a complete series of age classes, the ultimate problem of regulation to secure that balance and arrangement in the forest which will permit of a permanent sustained cut,. is necessarily obscured. In the many-aged forest, as well as in that composed of even-aged stands, a rotation is fixed upon, which is supposed to coincide with the average age of the timber to be cut. Although the volume of the immature stands falling in the last third of this rotation is immaterial, the petiod required for them to grow to given sizes, and the area stocked by these young stands, is important. To finally determine whether or not a forest is being over-cut; i.e., working capital instead of mere surplus is being withdrawn, we must determine three factors, all dependent on the rotation,—first, what the annual growth will be upon a normally arranged forest stocked at no greater degree of density than the existing forest, for this is the gauge of whether capital is being reduced; second, the amount of actual measureable (merchantable) capital required to produce this quantity annually, and its arrangement by age classes as to volume and area, in each age class; third, the comparison with the actual forest as to volume and area, in existing age classes. The crude assumptions in the illustration in § 137 as to growing stock and age classes are plainly insufficient to show these facts. An annual growth of 100 feet per year on cutover lands may or may not be obtained continuously. A growing stock of 4,000 bd. ft. per acre may or may not constitute the normal reserve. The elasticity of the French conception of normal relations of growing stock between medium forest as 3%, and old forest as 5% of the total merchantable volume, lies in the fact that it applies only to the form and relation of the two broad age groups, and equally to all degrees of stocking. This may be the only practical conception to apply to such forests, yet if possible, owing to the importance of the cutting cycle and the greater difficulty of our problem, a more concrete idea of possible sustained empirical yield is desirable. 154. Allowed Cut, Empirical Yield Table and Normal Stock. This can be secured when it is possible to obtain an empirical yield table (by methods described in § 141) applicable directly to the degree of stocking in the forest. This the French did not attempt. With such a table, the allowed cut of the forest is at once indicated. It area in the working circle rotation i This yield equals the total growth of a forest of this density for one year, if normally arranged as to age classes, or, its equivalent, the mean annual growth on one acre X total area. consists of the yield, at rotation age, of I acre X the 148 American Forest Regulation On this basis, the normal growing stock can be computed, not by the method of approximating the residual growing stock below the size exploited, as being normal at 4,000 bd. ft. per acre, for instance, but from the yield table. An example of an empirical yield table is given below for Western Yellow Pine, Coconino National Forest: TABLE 15. Empirical yield table of Western Yellow Pine reduced from normal by factor 66.2%. Scribner Dec C. Log Rule. Yield Mean annual growth Age Feet. B.M. Feet. B.M. 80 4,700 ‘ 59 90 ; 6,220 69 100 7,480 75 110 8,610 78 120 9,670 81 130 10,660 82 140 11,580 83 150 12,510 83 160 13,370 3 83 170 14,300 84 180 15,090 84 . 190 15,950 84 200 16,750 84 210 17,540 84 220 18,070 82 230 18,270 79 240 17,940 75 250 17,280 69 260 16,350 7 63 270 15,360 57 280 14,300 51 200 13,170 45 300 12,050 ; 40 310 10,920 35 320 9,800 oT 330 8,670 26 340 7,610 22 350 6,420 18 360 5,300 15 370 4,100 ie In § 135 the annual cut for the Coconino based on Von Mantel’s assumption, was found as 31,511 M ft. Based on the assumption that the annual cut should equal the annual growth, the cut, for a rotation of 200 years and area of 509,087 acres at 84 bd. ft. per year mean annual growth, would be 42,763,308 bd. ft. annually. ; iXr The growing stock required to perpetuate this cut would be, not — eer which (a+b+e+ ++) would call for 4,276,330 M feet, but - a = X 509,087 138,515 X 10 ar ~ < 509,087 (6,925 bd. ft. per acre) acres = Problem of Sustained Yield 149 = 3,525,427 M, or approximately 80 per cent of that required by the formula Beet = AG Ta : 2 . ; This determination of the real basis for a growing stock which would perpetuate the rate of growth now possible and realized in the past from the virgin forests enables us, first, to measure the actual growing stock to dis- cover whether there is a surplus or deficit, and second, prevents us from attempting to reserve, as working capital, wood which is actually surplus. 155. Comparison of Mean Annual Increment and Austrian Formula. Its Limitations. The mean annual growth of a stand to maturity rather than current growth per cent correctly gauges the increment for a stand which is cut since this cut takes, not the current increase from standing trees, but their total past growth, which is the mean annual growth times age of the stand. If the present stock exceeds or falls short of this normal growing stock, it is an indication that there is either a surplus caused by an excess of over- mature timber, or a deficit caused by past cutting, fires or other destructive agencies. It cannot mean that the indicated yield, or normal stock, is wrong since the actual past production of the forest itself has been taken as the basis for calculating this growing stock. It follows then that the Austrian formula, when based upon the empirical yield table to obtain the normal growing stock, and when the mean annual increment for the rotation age is used as the basis of increment, is an instructive check on the proper annual cut. The surplus, by our methods, should in order to save further loss be removed in one cutting cycle if the latter is fairly long. Cc, or at most 2cc, becomes the period of regulation. Then Annual cut = mean annual increment + Ga — Empirical Gn cc Or 2 CC Applying this formula to the Coconino: Annual cut = 42,763 M + 3151147 M — 3525427 M 100 — 42,763 M — 374280 M 100 = 39,020 M But applying the Austrian formula to current, growth as in Munger’s illustration, his empirical normal growing stock is first calculated as Gn = ( IX ce + Reserve) X area. With total current annual increment in the forest, per acre, as 100 feet, and cc as 50 years, reserve per acre 4,000 feet, Gn = 100X590 ++ 400 2 = 6,500 feet per acre. The actual growing stock is now 16,000 feet. Munger wants to cut 12,000 feet per acre on 4,000 acres or 48,000 M bd. ft. annually, on 200,000 acres, leaving the reserve of 4,000 feet to grow to 9,000 feet in 50 years. By the Austrian formula: 16000 — 6500 x 50 = 2090 bd. ft. per acre or 58,000 M bd. ft. in the first cutting cycle which Annual cut = 100 + (area) 150 American Forest Regulation is evidently excessive, due to the inclusion of growth in the formula which was not included by Munger in the first cutting cycle. The Austrian formula is thus quite evidently inapplicable to this transition problem on the basis of current growth on the cutover areas. ‘ The undertaking of regulation requires a sufficient knowledge of growth to indicate a rotation. Upon this basis, and the conception of a uniform felling series for even-aged stands, the empirical normal growing stock can be compared with the actual forest in order to separate the forest capital from surplus or deficit and obtain an indication of the amount of the required annual cut. The annual cut by any system of regulation will seek to remove an amount equal to the “interest” or growth, plus or minus an amount which will bring the capital either down or up to normal form within a reasonable period. When the true form of a series of age classes is not obtainable, a relation based on the growth of trees and broad age groups can be constructed, as done by the French in 1883, by which the surplus or deficit can be indicated as well as the growth. For our conditions, this relation should be based on the felling reserve and the influence of maturing crops of timber in deter- mining the cut. Whenever it is possible to determine this true form and volume of the empir- ical normal forest by means of an empirical yield table, and to base increment upon the mean annual growth from this table, the true relations between the empirical increment and surplus or deficit in the actual forest caused by abnor- mal age class distribution can be found, and the annual cut approximated by the Austrian formula check. Without this data the Austrian formula is no more accurate than Von Mantel’s and if cc = 4% r and “normal” stock is taken as = the two formulae will give identical results. This pure volume check on regulation accomplishes in a rough approximate manner, what should be determined on a basis of definite knowledge of the forest, as soon as that knowledge is available. The utility and value of the Austrian formula is dependent, then, not on the formula itself, which is merely the expression of a sound principle of regula- tion universally sought, but upon the determination of the three factors, actual increment, empirical ” normal” stock required by this increment, and the actual stock on hand. The cutting cycle then enables the determination of the cut per year. No knowledge of the age classes in the forest is required, and this is just where the formula fails. Every method of regulation seeks to establish this same result, but the dif- ferences between a practical plan and a formula check lie chiefly in recognition, of the fact that abnormality in volume is caused by abnormality in distribution of the respective age classes. Only by securing this proper distribution of age classes can the true normal volume and sustained cut ever be secured. The growth actually laid on in the forest during a given cutting cycle is not the mean annual but the current growth, and this is dependent upon the age and condition of these abnormally arranged age classes. 3eing sound in theory, the Austrian formula when based on facts as deter- Problem of Sustained Vield 151 mined by growth studies, does surprisingly well, but it is better to deal with the facts at first hand. In other words, since the regulation of the forest must be determined by the area, volume and current growth of the existing age classes, the determination of these areas, volumes, and the actual current growth expected, will in turn indicate the area and actual volume of the annual cut best adapted to securing progress towards a normal forest. 156. Necessity for Data on Age Classes. Inthe system proposed for many- aged forests, the present volume and actual current growth of the exploitable and of the maturing age classes were found as a prerequisite of fixing: the cut. But for lack of data on areas, the yield for the entire rotation and the true con- dition of abnormality of the forest could not be accurately obtained which delays the progress toward normal forest and sustained yield. In choosing a method of working out this problem of sustained yield the silvicultural behavior of the species must decide. If the trees customarily undergo a period of suppression in growth, the age of individual trees gives a very unreliable index of the number of years required for an acre to produce a given yield in wood.* But if the species is intolerant, we have two distinct advantages; first, the individual trees which survive and form the final cut are usually dominant throughout their life cycle and are seldom suppressed. Second, in spite of fires and other agencies, the forest tends towards even- aged groups, of varying size to be sure, but distinctly different from typical many-aged stands which result from suppression and natural selection over a long period of struggle. 157. A Method of Separation of Age Classes. The method to be described is applicable to intolerant species growing in stands of all ages in original forests. Since species susceptible to fire occur in even-aged stands and can be measured by direct yield tables, while tolerant species such as hemlock or spruce are subject to suppression, this method is especially applicable to Western Yellow Pine, Southern Longleaf or Loblolly Pine and similar species, and may have a wider application. For even in forests composed of tolerant species, many-aged, and mixed, the interference of fire, insects and wind constantly tends to produce groups of even age, and this fact can be taken advantage of to secure data for a yield table based on age, which will serve as a model or standard from which these essential relations of age and volume per.acre can be obtained even for all-aged stands. Owing-to its great impor- tance in future regulation, the method of securing and applying such a yield table is given in detail. The species to which it was applied was Western Yellow Pine, but the method should be applicable, with suitable modifications of field technique, to nearly all our American forests of mixed age. Essential Steps. ‘The three steps in this regulation are: (a.) Securing the normal or standard yield table, (b.) Application to the forest to secure the empirical yield table and to separate the forest into age classes by area and volume (c.) Regulation of the cut based on area, volume and prediction of growth of these age classes, by use of this yield table. * Chapman’s Forest mensuration §§ 263, 208, 299. 152 . American Forest Regulation Standard Yield Table. Selection of Plots. (a) Yield table. The standard methods are followed in securing plots. These plots are laid off in groups or stands whose appearance indicated that practically the entire stand is of a given age class, though not necessarily of even age. A curve of average height based on diameter should be drawn for each plot or group of plots, preliminary to computing volume.* Where trees evidently of an older or younger age class are included in the plot, the crown space, or the proportional area occupied by such trees may if desired be deducted along with their volume to confine the results to a single broad age class. Determining Age of Plots. Age of the plots is best determined by felling at least three trees, selected to represent average volumes. But when the timber is very large and old, and is inaccessible to logging for the present, the felling is not only time consuming (increasing the cost of plot measurement by 300 per cent or more) but wasteful of timber, especially in the older stands. A substitute method of obtaining the age of the plot is as follows: a’. A curve of growth in diameter must be obtained from numerous stump measure- ments on logged areas. This should show the age at B.H. outside bark for average trees of given diameters. It is necessary that these growth figures be obtained for trees and stands of the same type and quality as the plots measured, else the conclusions regarding age of the plot will be in error. b’. The diameter of the average tree in the plot must be determined. In reducing stands of uneven age to their equivalent for an even-aged stand, the standard practice is to determine the age of an even-aged stand which will yield a volume equal to that of the uneven-aged stand in question.** The basis of volume must be the volume table and volume unit used in calculating growth. The first step in. finding the tree of average diameter is to determine the tree of average volume from the total number of trees on the plot, and total volume. But as height is a variable, and the tree of this volume may be a tall tree with smaller diameter, or a short tree with larger diameter, we must first obtain the average height of a tree of this average volume, for the plot in question. The curve of average height on diameter for the plot has already been made for computing the volume on the plot, hence is available. With average height on diameter for the plot determined, there can be but one average diameter for a tree of a given volume on the plot. This is read from the curve of volume on diameter usually interpolated to 1/1o inch. The age of a tree of this diameter from the growth curve is taken as the age of the stand on the plot. Wherever site qualities can be separated, based on total heights of merchantable timber, and the curves of diameter growth obtained are codrdinated with trees on these separate site qualities, this method has the double advantage of enabling the field crew to secure three times.as many plots in a given time, and of basing the age of each plot upon a curve based on a large number of representative trees instead of but one or two trees which, on single plots in these uneven-aged stands may happen to be much older or younger than the real average desired. The stand not being truly even-aged, the advantage of felling single trees to determine age for the plot is much lessened, provided always that the growth data for the use of the alternative method,is properly coordinated with the site. 158. Application of Yield Table to the Forest. (b.) Separation of age classes in the forest. The problem is twofold, first, to find a method by which the age classes in the forest may be separated, second, to determine actual average density or degree of stocking for the entire area. Experience in former experimental attempts to solve this problem has shown the futility of trying to determine the area and volumes in different age classes on a large * See § 129 and 130, Forest Mensuration, John Wiley & Sons, 1921. ** Tbid., § 260. Problem of Sustained Yield 163 area of this character by mapping the crowns, or by any direct method. Instead, dependence must be placed directly upon the volume of the stand, and its direct division into age classes by aid of our knowledge of the number of trees in the stand and the volume, diameter and age of average trees. The Stand Table. To obtain the number of trees in the age classes, the volume of the average tree and the total volume of the class, a stand table is required. This stand table is best obtained during timber estimating by any method which provides for a table of diameters. In estimating, it is accepted that strips covering 5 to 10 per cent of a large area give a sufficiently accurate per cent of the total volume. This percentage principle applies as well to a stand table. If made to include the trees tallied in estimating, the resultant table should show the distribution of diameters in the stand, on a percentage basis, regardless of whether all or only a portion of the trees in the stand are tallied. The total volume of the trees actually tallied in a stand table may be correlated with the volume of the forest or unit in one of two ways. By area. 1. The area covered by the trees tallied is known. This enables one to reduce the table to a stand per acre, which is assumed to be average for the forest. By volume. 2. The volume tallied is taken as the basis. In this case, the average stand per acre tallied need not coincide with that of the forest. The relation in volume is found by comparing the total volume in the stand table with that of the forest. If 20 per cent has been tallied, the proportion is as I to 5. This is a more useful relation than area and more easily obtained. Purpose and Application. (c.) The real purpose of the stand table is to serve as a basis for determining the percentage of volume in the different diameters or age classes for the large area or working group which it represents. If a stand table can be divided into groups representing age classes, and the volumes in these age classes separated, these volumes can be expressed in terms of per cent of total volume for the stand table and if this table is properly constructed and representative of the forest, then these per cents will apply to the entire unit and will separate the total estimate into volume in the respective age classes. The steps then are: 1. Separate the volume in the stand table into volumes of given age classes. 2. Find the per cent of total volume which these age classes represent. 3. Apply these per cents to the total estimate to divide the forest into age classes. 159. Separation of Stand Table into Age Classes. The factors of the problem are: age of average tree of each age class, and its diameter, volume of said tree, number of trees in age class, in the stand table. When these factors are determined, the volume in the age class, its age and the area occupied can be determined and the results applied to the forest unit. In any method, only a few broad age classes should be separated for the working group. By Diameter Groups. The simplest basis of division of the stand table is by diameter groups, assuming that the average age of a diameter ‘class holds true for the trees in the class or will serve as a basis of volume separation (French method of 1883). But the division of mature or merchantable timber into age classes based on diameter alone, actually runs counter to a law of growth of trees growing in stands. Diameter growth of individual trees is far more variable than height growth, being affected by the density of the stand and the origin and dominance of the individual tree. For trees of a given age class, whether growing in even-aged stands or scattered through older stands, the dominant trees grow more rapidly and reach larger ultimate sizes before death than do the intermediate, while the suppressed trees are much smaller in diameter for their age than the more vigorous trees. Trees of a given diameter over a large area include always a range of ages, and this range becomes greater as the diameter of the class increases.* By Age Groups. lf as few as three broad groups are made (corresponding with the *In the larger diameter classes the range of age may again diminish due to the fact that only dominant trees reach these sizes. 154 American Forest Regulation French system of two groups, plus a third overmature or decadent group), it may be possible to separate the stand on a basis of average age rather than diameter limits. For Western Yellow Pine, the young, merchantable age class, below the exploitable age, or up to 150 years in a 200 year rotation, may be tallied separately by the black color of bark and thus actually separated, as an age group, from the mature and veteran yellow pine timber. If this has not been done in general estimating, the stand table at least will have to show separate tallies for blackjack, and the per cent relation thus obtained is applied to the total estimate. ; Lacking this differentiation in appearance based on color of bark, the younger age class will probably have to be separated by diameter. It is in the determination of average age for the groups that a flaw appears (ignored by the French as immaterial). 160. Average Age of Groups. To Determine Average Age of the Group. The process is identical with that described for determining the age of plots in constructing the yield table, 1. Determine total volume in the diameter group. Get volume of average tree, From table of volumes on diameter for type, get diameter of this average tree. Look up age of said tree from growth curve based on diameter. ho Ep SuEE7Ai\NGs fa ECE Soe aeleeteters tela fa [ee Fn fe ea fe a BERR SeeEes eae Seas BEE ca ea] [a Baas BEB BESS B HEDGE BLES AS VeANe Soe ee 42h AD ERaSaeeeAeseeee SERIES Nake een ere fila CEES BEReANS NESS ‘Ab | BN |_| BW a Be oo [esa Se [| IN | | Ws | al ea BEES ja Jj3¢ e Fic. 7. Volume of Western Yellow Pine, Distributed by Diameter Classes, Coconino National Forest. Total Volume. —- — — Volume of Mature Class, Decreasing by 5% for each 2-inch Diameter Class. ----- — Volume of Mature Class, Taking 50% of each Diameter Class. ——. - —— ~—— Division of Volumes into Mature and Veteran Classes, by Diameter Groups, each Containing an Equal Volume. Figure 7 illustrates three different methods of dividing the stand or group into two age classes. The upper curve represents the volume actually occurring in each diameter class. By the first method, it is considered that the trees which belong to the veteran age class form an increasing per cent of each diameter class. This increase is taken for illustration as 5 per cent beginning with 14 inches. The resultant volume of the veterans Problem of Sustained Yield Dos is separated from that of the remaining mature age class by the line This method was tried out on the Plumas Natignal Forest in 1912, and described by Barrington Moore in Proceedings of Society of American Foresters, Vol. IX, No. 2, Page 216. This method uses diameter as a basis, but endeavors to follow the known laws of diameter growth by this cumbersome and impractical subdivision of each class. The second method makes an arbitrary division, based on diameter classes, between veterans and mature trees, and is illustrated by the vertical line —-—-. This is simple of application, but departs widely from the laws of growth, throwing many veterans in with the mature group, and vice versa. The third method is never used and is included only for purposes of comparison of results. It is to divide each diameter group into equal volumes for veterans and for mature, by the line The resulting average tree, taken from the stand table on which these curves are based, for each of the three methods resulted as follows: Volume of Diameter of Age of average tree average tree average tree Method used Age class board feet inches ” years Diameter Classes Subdivided Veteran 837 27 302 Mature 515 23.5 245 Two Diameter Groups Veteran 1,267 20.5 345 Mature 303 2185 214 Equal Volumes Veteran 609 24.5 261 Mature 609 24.5 261 These results indicate, first, that by the method of dividing by diameter groups, the average volume and diameter of the older group is raised arbitrarily by the exclusion of the slower growing smaller trees. When the average age is sought from a curve of diameter based on age, the indicated age is incorrect and exceeds the normal age of the group, so that it is necessary under these circumstances to derive age from a curve of age based directly on diameter. The reverse of this condition is shown by the purely theoretical division into groups of equal volume, by which the resulting average tree and age of each group is equal. The true average age and volume evidently lies between these extremes. While the crude basis of division adopted in the illustration is evidently incorrect in that it includes too great a portion of the total volume in the mature class and raises its age to 245 years, yet evidently this method comes close to a division in which volume and age of the average tree for each group correspond reasonably with the probable conditions whose determination is sought. This method is impractical in application, since the determination of the correct per cents of each diameter class to take for each age group is difficult, and the computation bunglesome. Based Directly on Age. But there is another and simpler way of solving this problem. The yield table is the best indication of the ages at which stands of the species approach maturity and begin to retrograde. The forest is composed of a series of age classes each including several diameters. When this continuous series is to be combined into but two groups, each group in turn embraces trees whose diameters overlap those in the other group. By shifting the average age of either group, the number of separate age classes included in both groups is changed, but there is no inherent difficulty in grouping the total number of age classes in any desired combination provided the two averages are far enough apart to fall within separate groups. 156 American Forest Regulation It is possible, for instance, in a forest containing a definite number of trees, and a given total volume, to select two trees,of given volume, one for each of two broad groups. With these two volumes fixed, a definite number of trees will be required in each group to make up both the total volume and total number of trees in the forest. If falsely based on equal division of each diameter class, each group would take half the total, and the average volume of each group would be equal to that for the total stand. If based on division into 2 diameter groups the excess in normal size of the veterans would require too few trees in the class, the remainder required to make up the total being trees with the smaller average volume. To approximate the actual conditions in the forest, which is the result desired, let age be the starting point, since it is the basis sought. From the yield table select the age indicated as most characteristic of each class required. The steps then are: 1. Age required for class. 2. Diameter of a tree of this age. 3. Average volume of a tree of this diameter. If the number of trees required for each age class, in order to make up both the total number and the total volume in the stand table, can now be found, the problem is solved. The solution given below can be applied only to two groups. In the example given Western Yellow Pine, the younger group has already been separated by the appearance of the bark. The method then will accomplish the separation of the mature or exploitable portion of the timber in a forest, above a given diameter, into the two groups representing decadent and vigorous trees. This is well worth doing. In forests already under management, in the second cutting cycle, the method will separate the mature from the young merchantable group. Formula. For this solution the full data for each separate diameter class in the stand table is not needed. A count of all trees tallied, and their total volume, will suffice. (It is assumed that Bfackjack are tallied separately.) Then x = number of mature trees. y = number of veteran trees. a= volume of an average mature tree. b = volume of an average veteran tree. Evidently ax + by = total volume of stand. But x-+ y=total number of trees in stand. If this total is multiplied by the volume of the average mature or smaller tree, a, the resultant volume a(x-+y) can be subtracted from the total volume of the stand, to indicate the surplus over a(x-+y) in the forest, due to the fact that a certain number of the trees actually have the average volume b instead of a. The surplus contained in one such tree is b —a or the difference in volume between a veteran and a mature tree. By dividing the total surplus by the surplus of one tree (b—a) the number of trees is found which must contain an average volume of 0 instead of a, and the remainder is the number of mature or a trees. Let c=total number of trees d= total volume Then ax+by=d a(x-++ y) =ac (b—a)y=d—ac _._d—ac ba x=c—y Problem of Sustained Yield 157 161. Illustration from Coconino National Forest. STAND TABLE Age class Trees Volume Per cent Blackjack 43,084 5,931 M 18 Yellow Pine 44,423 27,042 M 82 32,073 M 100 Divison oF YELLOW PINE INTO VETERANS AND MATURE Diameter Volume per B.H. tree Age* inches** Ft. ) B:Mt4* Veterans 300 27 805 Mature 200 20.7 340 Blackjack 90 07; 137 x—=number of mature trees. y =number of veterans. 340 x + 805 y = 27,042,800 ft. B. M. 340 x + 340 y = 340 X 44,423 or 15,103,820 ft. B. M. 465 y = 11,938,780 ft. B. M. y —.25,677. trees. x = 18,746 trees. Mature pine — 6,373,640 ft. B. M. Veterans = 20,669,985 ft. B. M. Total = 27,043.025, ft. B. Me PERCENT OF MATURE AGE CLASSES IN VIRGIN STANDS ONLY Timber above 12 inches D.B.H. In yellow pine. In total stand. Volume Volume Mature 23.690 19.4% Veteran 76.4% 62.6% Blackjack beers 18.0% ToTaL STAND OF SAWTIMBER IN VIRGIN STANDS, Drvivep INTO AGE CLASSES Veterans 1,972,618 M Mature 611,323 M Blackjack 567,206 M Total 3,151,147 M This gives us the volume in each of three age classes, corresponding to a definite average age. It is evident, by the method used, that should we decide to divide the stand into age classes based on an increased average age for veterans, the number of veteran trees in the forest would be reduced and of mature trees increased, which coincides with the laws of growth operating in the forest. The age groups are com- posite averages, and these averages may be altered by altering the basis, age, without introducing an error in fact or misinterpreting the true conditions of the stand. 162. Immature Age Classes. In discussing the factor of the empirical yield table * Data from yield table. ** Data from table, Diameter Growth, Bulletin 101 (Page 20), T. S. Woolsey, Jr. *** Data from table, Volume on Diameter. * Error of 825 feet by neglecting decimals in obtaining volume per tree. 158 American Forest Regulation (§ 139), or actual density of the forest, it was shown that age and volume of the | separate age classes in a forest must first be found, for owing to the difference which the age of a stand makes in its normal volume, no possible comparison with actual volume or estimated stand in a forest can be attempted without age as a basis. By the above method, the age of three classes, all that are needed, has been found. | But before determining the density factor and empirical yield table (by the method — described in $141), a further analysis of the forest is necessary, to bring out the importance of the role which reproduction and timber below merchantable sizes plays in any scheme of permanent regulation of yield. Effect on Density of Stand. The density of a given forest is determined by three factors; first, the age classes, themselves, as shown; second, the actual degree of stocking or occupation of the site by the merchantable stand compared to full stocking (to be determined); third, the proportion of the total area occupied by age classes below merchantable sizes. A forest composed of trees and groups of all ages intermingled may have 50 per cent of its area occupied by merchantable timber. If the remaining 50 per cent is stocked with young or unmerchantable sizes the forest may have an actual density of 100 per cent. But unless it is possible to ascertain the area so stocked with young timber and deduct it, the 100 per cent stocking is not apparent in the mature stand. Thus the average stand per acre of merchantable timber of most forests is far below the stands on average acres of mature timber and should normally be less than half of this figure. (See yield table for “%r years.) For computing the future yield of these mature classes, there are two alternatives, either to assume, e.g., that 100 per cent of the area is occupied by mature age classes, with a density of 50 per cent, a yield of % the full yield per acre from the yield table, or else, to determine that but 50 per cent of the area is stocked with merchantable age classes but that the yield on this area will be 100 per cent of or equal to that of the yield table. In the even-aged form of forest the latter condition is evident. It is equally true of the many-aged form and should be so treated. The total future yield of these merchantable age classes will be the same in either case, but the average density of stocking is absolutely different. So much for the forest which is fully stocked. In the actual or partially stocked forest, the same relations exist. Assuming that one half of the area is reproduced to unmer- chantable, young ages, and that the merchantable timber, in quantity, by age classes, is but 60 per cent of a full yield; this merchantable timber may be considered as occupy- ing 30 per cent of the area with a yield 100 per cent of that of the yield table. And if the immature timber is disregarded, the mature stand if figured either way will give the same volume in future yield. Its actual volume and yield is not changed, Area and density are reciprocal factors. .50 X 60% = .30 X 100% of the standard yields. For regulation extending beyond the first cutting cycle, it is important to know what the immature age classes will yield. This yield will be largely determined, not by the number of seedlings established, but by the area restocked in acres. Yields are based on area, not on single trees. Effect on First Cutting Cycle. If in the forest survey, this principle is recognized it will be possible to note the percentage of total area which is covered by young timber not under suppression, and having good chances for survival, just as separate areas are mapped in even-aged young stands. The more accurately this final result, ie., the area ultimately stocked with timber by this reproduction, is predicted, the more accurate will be the prediction of the growth for the period when this young timber matures. On the other hand, quite a large error in this determination will not affect in any way the possible yields obtainable or predicted for the timber now of merchantable sizes. What it will do is to give a false or erroneous idea of the possible total yield and con- sequent length of cutting cycle to be assigned during the rotation to this young timber, and hence to influence erroneously the length of the first cutting cycle required to remove the timber now mature. Problem of Sustained Yield 159 Another reason in favor of determining the area restocked with young timber is this—if this area is subtracted before computing the density of stocking of the mature stands, this latter density tends to approach normal and be indicative of the actual yields per acre obtainable, while if not subtracted these yields are evidently much too low per acre. If the work is carefully done and the maximum area of young growth is secured and the stocking or reproduction is plentiful, the density factor obtained for the mature timber may be applied not merely to these mature stands, but to the young growth as well, to assure a conservative prediction of future yields. These relations are illustrated below: Density of Stand, or Reduction Per Cent. To determine this average density or reduc- tion per cent, in the illustration, § 161, the area occupied by seedlings and saplings, i.e., reproduction, and by poles, is to be first deducted from the net area, 438,423 acres not yet cut over. Based on data obtained in the forest survey, the figure 25 per cent was adopted as representing the area within the working circle which is reproduced to seedlings and saplings; 25 per cent of 438,423 acres is 100,806 acres. The net area occupied by poles plus timber over 12 inches was then 328,617 acres. Poles, 6 to 12 inches in diameter, by data obtained from plots in normal or fully stocked stands averaged 88 poles per acre. On 7,034 acres tallied in preparing the stand table for the forest, the average number of poles 6 to 12 inches was 4.9. This gives = or 5.5 per cent of the total area stocked with poles at rate of 88 per acre, or 24,842 acres, leaving 303,775 acres net for timber over 12 inches. 163. The Prediction of Actual or Empirical Yields for the Forest. Density of Stand, Timber 12” and Over. Applying the principle described in §161 we get, for the merchantable timber, Acreage required Per cent Age Yield per acre if normally total net area, Class Years “Normal” fit. B.M. stocked (x) 12” only Blackjack 90 9,400 60,341 ar Mature 200 25,300 24,163 12.5 Veterans 300 18,200 108,385 56.2 ; eotan li" Total “normally stocked” area 192,889 100.0 192,889 Then the density of mature age classes 12” and over is or 63.5 per cent. 03,775 Since the density of the timber above 12” is computed on the basis of 63.5 per cent of normal, it will be convenient to compute the density of the pole class 6” to 12” on the same basis instead of as normal density, since in the former case, the corrected empirical yield table can then be applied to all the age classes including poles and seedlings. Since the area of seedlings has been established on the basis of a stand which will produce a mature crop of average density, the assumption of the same density for seedlings is conservative, rather than “normal” density. By adding the normally stocked pole area, 24,842 acres, to the total actual area for timber 12” and over, the total actual area inclusive of poles is found, as 328,617 acres. * But if poles are computed at 63.5 density, poles would occupy 39,121 acres instead of 24,842 acres, giving an overlapping or surplus area to adjust of 14,279 acres. Then ratio of density = 63.5 328,617 + 14,279 328,617 = 63.5 X 1.0422 or 66.2 (actually 66.18) Then .662 is the true density factor for the entire accessible area of yellow pine, the reduction per cent to apply to the yields given in the “normal” or standard yield table. (x) Found by dividing stand ($161) by yield of one acre “normal” from yield table for given age of stand. 160 American Forest Regulation If the area occupied by poles had been estimated on the basis of fully stocked stands correction would have been necessary as before to reduce poles to empirical density. Otherwise a “normal” yield per acre would be assumed for these classes at maturity. The above plan seems preferable. Area Occupied by Age Classes. From ratio 100 (True ratio is 66.18, error 260 acres adjusted.) AREA OF AGE CLASSES “Normal” area Actual area Per cent of Age Class acres acres 438,423 acres Years Poles 24,842 37,486 8.5 50 Blackjack 60,341 91,072 20.8 100 Mature 24,163 36,460 8.3 200 Veterans 108,385 163,590 37.4 300 otal 207.721 328,617 75.0 Reproduction 109,806 25.0 20 Total in forest working group 438,423 100.0 164. Application to Group Selection Forests. Relation of Cutting Cycle to Area Cut Over Already. Nothing illustrates so well the interdependence of area and volume in regulation as the relation of the area already cut over, in a virgin forest, to the cutting cycle. Clear cut and ruined areas requiring restocking cannot be included in regulation for the first rotation at all. But areas cut by conservative methods, or areas in which restocking has taken place after former cuttings, are so included. To determine the length of the first cutting cycle, which is to complete the first cut of virgin timber, the total area may be reduced by the area clear cut or destroyed, but on the area cut under conservative methods, it is better, if the process has not gone too far, to compute the proportion or per cent of the area which has been already cut as part of this first or transition cutting cycle, which has already elapsed. Where the cycle is %r and the per cent of the original stand cut is proportional to this cutting cycle, then each acre cut over in logging is equivalent to but % an acre actually cut clear, but to one full superficial acre for the cutting cycle itself. An acre cut clear is equivalent not merely to one acre cut over in the first cycle, but, if reproduction and young timber are destroyed, to one acre in the second and subsequent cycles as well, which would thus have their yields reduced. Hence the elimination of such areas in regulation during the first rotation. Illustration. Coconino. Areas: Virgin Timber 438,423 acres Cut over 116,137 acres Total 554,560 acres Problem of Sustained Yield 161 Of the area cut over, there is Cut clear 45,473 acres Cut, leaving seed trees 8,208 Cut by Forest Service marking rules 62,456 j Area conservatively cut 70,664 Total 116,137 acres On the area of 70,664 acres, a second cut can be obtained in %r years. This is borne out, also by the per cent of area theoretically cut over as shown by the area of each age class in the remaining stand. An 80% cut will take, approximately Veterans 100% = 37.4% of acre Mature 90% = 7.5% Total 45% of area or nearly %. Then this area if included as part of the unit, gives a total of 500,087 acres, and an area cut over, in the first cycle, of 13.9 per cent equivalent to 14 years, on this reduced working circle. By including the clear cut area in a total of 554,560 acres, the per cent of area cut over for first cycle is 21 per cent or 21 years, and for the second cycle, 8 per cent or 8 years, a total of 29 years cut, equivalent to 15 per cent of the total area. The total amount cut from the forest has been 593,621 M bd. ft. On the basis of 84 bd. ft. mean annual growth on 554,560 acres, this is equivalent to 13 years’ growth. The conclusion is, that a conservative reduction of 10 years can be made in the length of the first cutting cycle as having been already cut, and by reducing the area to 500,087 acres, a period of 90 years should be allowed to complete the cut, with the assumption that 10 years’ growth has taken place on the areas first cut over. For this cycle of 90 years, the cut can be calculated based upon the actual age classes present, by volume, growth and area. 165. Coordination of Cutting Cycle with Area and Volume of Existing Age Classes. There remains one problem in calculating growth. The progression or change repre- sented, on the one hand by growth, and on the other by cutting, when it extends over a period of 50 to 100 years affects the percentage of present or existing age classes cut, progressively. When the volume per cent cut, as 80 per cent, coincides with the volume of age classes, as veterans plus mature, it is best to assume, as do the French, that the cutting actually removes these classes completely. The volume left as seed trees in marking is balanced against an equal volume cut from a younger class. Then the cut for cc years will be the present volume plus % the growth of these classes, plus the volume of the timber falling, by age or size, in the period %cc below, with half its growth for cc years. To get the % growth over so long a period, it is better to take the yield of one acre at % the cutting period than % the difference in yield at beginning and end of period. The difference in results is shown below. Veterans, at 300 years = 12,050 ft. at 390 years = 1,600 ft. average = 6,825 ft. Yield at 345 years= 7,015 ft. Difference in yield, by second method, + 100 ft. per acre or 2.7%. The maturing class, since its age limits coincide with % the cutting cycle, may be computed on the basis that the entire area of the next class covering cc years matures, 7 162 American Forest Regulation 4 is cut, and the average age of the stands cut is the present age plus 4 of the cutting cycle, thus giving 4 the “growth” on the total maturing stand. But when the first cut takes only a part of an age class, say 90 per cent of the mature timber class, it is a question as to whether we shall assume that the 10 per cent remain- ing shall be carried through to the end of the cutting cycle—which it would not be in practice—or our basis of calculation revised during the period to conform with the~ actual practice of marking. The best plan is probably to add the 10 per cent of mature timber to the area of the residual growing stock where it belongs, and then in turn to deduct an equal area from the maturing Blackjack class which usually constitutes the residual growing stock, to be held over for the following cutting cycle, instead of figuring the entire class as entering the exploitable age class in this cycle. This is the same principle as raising the diameter limit (§ 144). . On this basis the cut for the first 90 years will be, Exploitable class: Per cent of Averageage Yield per total area Age class Age when cut acre. ft. to be cut Area, acres Total cut Veterans 300 345 7,015 100 163,590 1,147,583 M Mature 200 245 17,610 90 32,823 578,013 M 1,725,500 M Maturing crop: Yield per Per cent of Averageage acre,bd.ft. total area Age when cut when cut to be cut Area, acres Total cut Mature 200 245 17,600 10 3,646 64,206 M Blackjack 100 145 12,045 96* 87,423 1,053,010 M 1,127,216 M YZ cut = 563,608 M Total cut for cutting cycle 2,289,204 M bd. ft. Annual cut for 90 years 25,435 M bd. ft. 166. Comparison of Annual Cut by Methods of Regulation Proposed. A comparison of results may now be made, for the different methods of regu- lation proposed. Accepting a 100 year cutting cycle reduced to 90 years by previous cutting, for the removal of the first or original growth, and a cut of 80 per cent of the merchantable stand above 12 inches, as scaled in board feet, Scribner’s Dec. C. Rule, we get, for a growing stock of 3,151,147 M ft.: By French method of 1883, 80 X Ga . : Annual cut = errr —= 28,054 M. This assumes a balance of growth and decadence. By Von Mantel’s formula, Annual cut = * = 31,511 M. This result must be rejected as based on false assumptions of normality. *91,072 — 3,646 acres = 4 per cent of the Blackjack area, equivalent to 10 per cent of the smaller area of mature timber. Problem of Sustained Yield 163 By cutting the mean empirical annual growth, Annual cut = 84 bd. ft. X 509,087 acres = 42,763 M. This fails to rec- ognize the presence of overmature, stagnant surplus. By Austrian formula, building up the stock to 3,525,427 M in 90 years, Annual cut = 38,605 M. By cutting the actual volume, plus growth, to 80 per cent and creating a felling reserve, Annual cut = 25,435 M. The agreement between the latter figure and the first, based on the original French method of 1883 which ignores growth and a felling reserve, and the difference of 13,170M ft. in the annual cut as indicated by the Austrian formula are very significant, for upon these data rest the proof of the fact that the Austrian formula is not applicable to virgin forests in America if sustained yield is sought. Theoretically, the cut by this formula is nearly 50 per cent higher than it should be by the best analysis of facts that we can get. This won’t do. Evidently Munger’s assumption of a balance between growth and decadence, and the original French plan of ignoring growth gives results much closer to the facts. The explanation lies in the fact that the Austrian formula assumes that the forest is already under regulation and is producing an annual increment on all stands. It does not take into account the natural loss from decadence, which must be incurred previous to cutting, on all stands, and in a long cutting cycle is a serious factor. In the present instance, the loss on 163,590 acres of veteran timber is the difference between the yield of one acre at 300 and 345 years, or half the period, multiplied by the area. This is, : 12,050 — 7,015 = 5,035 bd. ft. per acre 5035 X 163,590 = 823,675 M bd. ft. in 90 years This represents a loss of 9,152 M ft. per year. Added to the indicated cut, by the last method, it would total 34,587 M bd. ft. or but 4,018 M bd. ft. per year less than the cut indicated by the Austrian formula. The formula fails because it is not based on actual conditions. The simple formula used by Munger is approximately correct because it does coincide with actual condi- tions. What is needed is a method by which the actual conditions and not formula determine the cut. The method proposed, whether it is applied by means of diameter classes and growth as in many-aged forests, or age classes, as in the above illustration, is based on the conditions in the forest, and makes no erroneous assumptions as to either form or arrangement of age classes, or growth. In this illustration, the growth reaching maturity in the 90 year period fails to balance the decadence or loss by 78,030 M bd. ft. or 867 M bd. ft. per year. Ina forest composed largely of younger timber the reverse would be true. 167. Summary of Basic Principles. To sum up: The basis of applied regulation in America as elsewhere must be the deter- mination of growth in the forest, for the average empirical stocking, and the 164 American Forest Regulation division of the forest into age classes by volume and area either by diameter classes or directly on age. With a long cutting cycle and correspondingly large felling reserve required by our economic conditions of transition from virgin to regulated areas, the annual cut during the cutting cycle will be found by dividing by cc years the sum of: 1. The volume now exploitable plus 1% the growth during the cycle—best computed as, the volume which the exploitable timber will have in % cc years, 2. Plus % the present volume of the timber which will mature within the cycle, increased by % of the growth on the volume cut, which is % of the growth on this total volume. The felling reserve will be the volume, at end of cutting cycle, of all stands which have matured within the cycle, on areas after cutting is past on the area. This will be equivalent to the volume, at end of cycle, of stands now ranging in age from r—cc to r—2cc years. This basis is applicable to all forms of forest whether even- or many-aged. The analysis of the forest into age classes, the determination of the immature age classes by area and the obtaining of an empirical yield table will make possible the further regulation of the cut covering the second cutting cycle and remainder of the rotation. The balancing of the cut between the first and second cutting cycle, as far as permitted by silvicultural conditions, means carrying over the surplus, and can be accomplished by reducing the per cent of cut in first cutting, equivalent to raising the diameter limit and age, or vice versa. 168. Factors Indicating a Shortening of the Cutting Cycle. Jilustrations. The loss by decadence of 25 per cent of the total available timber, or 360 per cent of the cut actually realized, as shown above, is sufficiently serious to raise a question as to whether the cutting cycle in virgin forest should be prolonged to % r even if the per cent of the stand which must be cut indicates this procedure. The possibility of shortening the cycle, say to %r, depends upon the data on growth obtained for cutover lands, and the reliability of conclusions drawn as to the behavior of the forest under management. Assuming, in the above case, that growth on cutover lands, per acre of timber, increases, from 84 bd. ft. to 105 bd. ft. per year, or 131 per cent, this would permit of shortening the cutting cycle to 80 years which at 105 bd. ft. per year would yield 8,400 bd. ft. as before. Then, if 10 years cut has already been made, a cutting cycle of 70 years would be indicated instead of go years. On this basis, the annual cut by the three methods discussed would be: 1. By French Method, 80 Ga. 7O Annual cut = = 36013 M. 2. By Austrian formula, Annual cut = 42,763 M+ 3151147 M — 3525427 M__ 37416 M 7O 3. By American Method, Annual cut = 34927 M. Problem of Sustained Yield | 165 The latter figures are obtained as follows: 1. Exploitable class. Averageage Yield per Age class Age when cut acre Area Total cut Veterans 300 335 8,140 163,590 1,331,622 M Mature 200 335 18,105 32,823 594,224 M 1,925,846 M 2. Maturing group. Averageage Yield per Age - whencut acre when cut Area Total cut Mature 200 235 18,105 3,646 66,010 M Blackjack 100 135 11,120 87,423 972,143 M 1,038,153 M Y% to be cut 519,076 Total for cutting cycle 2,444,922 M Annual cut 34,9027 M For this reduced cycle, the loss from decadence is 639,636 M bd. ft. or 3,910 bd. ft. per acre on 163,590 acres, giving a total, with the cut, of 3,084,458 M bd. ft. This loss is 9,137 M bd. ft. per year—nearly the same annual loss as before, but less by 20 years, or by 174,039 M bd. ft. on account of the shortened cycle. The total cut is nearly the same being greater by 155,718 M for the shorter cycle. The real difference lies in the more rapid cutting, giving an annual increase in the cut, of 9,492M ft. or over 37 per cent. As this increased annual cut is justified only by a showing that growth on cutover lands will permit the shortening of the cycle without interrupting the continuity of the yield, the importance of the point originally made, that growth studies on cutover land are the beginning of regulation, is again emphasized.. Knowing the proper length of cycle, the disposal of the virgin timber even in the absence of data on decadence may usually be regulated on a conservative basis by ignoring both growth and decadence. 169. Quiz. Why is sustained yield the ultimate problem? What are the limitations of the Austrian formula? Its good points? In many-aged stands how can yield tables be constructed? How can the yield table be applied to the forest? How can the stand table be separated into age classes and average age determined? How should immature age classes be treated? What must be done to secure “reduction per cent’? How is the area occupied by age classes secured? How is the cutting cycle coérdinated with area and volume of existing age classes? Explain how the prediction of actual or empirical yields is done. In the case cited in § 166 which method indicates the largest yield? Why? Which two methods give similar results? Why? What are the basic principles of the American Method? With a long felling cycle how can the annual cut be calculated? What will the felling reserve be? Discuss the relative evils of loss through decadence as balanced by interruption of yield. CHAPTER. XIII REGULATION OF FORESTS COMPOSED OF EVEN-AGED STANDS 170. Relation of Cutting Cycle to Distribution of Age Classes in the Working Group. The same principles apply to the regulation of forests composed of even-aged stands, as to many-aged, or group selection forms. The method of cutting adopted will determiné the future form of these forests. Clear cutting with artificial reproduction simply means a 100 per cent cut, and a cutting cycle equal to r years, unless modified by the inter- mixture of young stands on the general cutting area, forming several series of age classes as explained in § 116, when cutting cycles of less than r years are actually practiced. In this case, while each acre is cut but once in a rotation, the logging operations return to the logging unit to cut the succes- sively maturing stands at shorter intervals. If this were not so, at least during the first or transition rotation, these stands would reach ages ranging from r to 2r years before they were all cut on the final logging unit. Just because a stand is even-aged now, it need not be clear cut. For instance in the Lodgepole pine forests on the Deerlodge National Forest, Montana and elsewhere, a long period of experimental cutting evolved a standard of marking which removed not 100 per cent but only 64 per cent of the stands which had reached exploitable size, leaving the other 36 per cent to put on growth. This process, continued, will break up the even age of these stands and bring on a group form. It will also increase* the yield per acre of large sized material and the total yield of wood. It introduces the factor of thinnings into the question of yields. 171. Similarity of Problem with that of Many-aged Forms. The problem of regulating the even-aged form of forests should be approached in the same way as shown for many-aged forms. The first decision should be to deter- mine the length of the cutting cycle which is required to grow the second cut, basing this on the maturing of younger age classes. In even-aged stands the second cut will include the remainder of the mature timber in the stands which have been cut over in the first cutting cycle (the 34 per cent in the illustration); plus the stands, now immature, which will reach maturity within the second cycle, and which, in this form of forest are on separate areas, where in the many-aged forest they are mixed with the mature timber. It will probably be impossible to return to cut again even for thinnings or improvement cuttings, in stands once cut over until all the remaining acces- sible exploitable stands of overmature growth have been cut over once. The limitations of logging, as expressed by the cutting cycle, will prevent it. 172. Application to Eastern Mixed Hardwoods. For lack of analysis and separation of the forest into its respective age classes, the application of * Subject to losses from windfall, etc., which will probably be excessive. T.S. W., Jr. Regulation of Even-Aged Stands 167 this system in Eastern hardwoods at present is being based on the assumption that the forest can be divided into even-aged stands, which will be clear cut. Areas are classed or allotted according as their average age is veteran, mature, or young merchantable. The periods favored in the Appalachian forests are 20 years in length. The stands in the oldest class are roughly assumed to be cut clean, and to furnish the annual cut for the next period. (See data on Harvard Forest in appendix B.) The amount of the annual cut is based on the first plan proposed, corresponding with the French System’ of 1883 by neglecting both growth and decadence. Regulation on this basis is by the allotment principle. The areas regulated are small and the period of 20 years may not coincide with the cutting cycle, which may be much less, in case transportation is well organized. Or the forest may be composed of such large and irregular blocks of different age on account of past cuttings that no regular cutting cycle or felling series can possibly be hoped for in this rotation. If, for instance, all the over-mature timber in a working group were located on one logging unit, and it was decided to remove it in 20 years, the cutting within this period would not touch the remainder of the logging units. If each of the remaining logging units were also comparatively even-aged so that the major logging operations were concentrated in them successively, during the entire rotation, then the cutting cycle as far as there can be said to be one, is coincident with the rotation. The creation of such large areas of forest composed of a single age group is one of the evil results of our unavoidable former system of extensive logging operations conducted without thought for the future of the forest as a productive property. One of the main objects of regulation on such culled and mangled forests should be to plan as soon as possible for the adoption of a cutting cycle of reasonable shortness, which will permit of logging in every unit once during the cycle, and will thus create a number of series of age classes in each unit instead of one or two only. Just as, in the West, a cycle of % to %4r may be forced on us by inaccessi- bility (and the necessity for extensive railroad logging operations), thus reducing the component age groups on any one area to 2 or 3, so the unreg- ulated exploitation of private areas has done the same thing in part on the Eastern forests which the government is now about to attempt to put under regulation for sustained yield. If we stop with the assumption that even when stands are in reality composed of several ages, we must, for the sake of simplicity, assume them to be of even age and, because it is apparently difficult to know how to calculate the possible cut under a system of partial cutting, we assume that the cut will be clear, then the outward form or model of our regulation will tend, not towards the actual creation of these several age series in each unit, but towards their further elimination; either that or else there will be no real coordination between the calculated cut and cutting cycle, and the distribution of this cut by area and by per cent of the stands taken. The argument here is not against the adoption of some plan of regulating the annual cut, which should be done on whatever basis is possible, pending the determination of the true condition of the age classes in the forest. It 168 American Forest Regulation is merely intended to point out the tendency to adopt the simplest conception of regulation, that of a single series of even-aged stands with cc =r, when possibly a little more study of the data at hand would permit of a basis more in harmony with the true state of the forest, and with the ultimate form required for best silvicultural results. If Appalachian hardwood forests are to be transposed by clear cutting into even-aged stands, the assumption of even-aged groups now tends in the right direction—but even then, the failure to recognize more than one of these groups to a logging unit tends to uselessly perpetuate the large cutting area which characterizes the long cutting cycle. An analysis of the forest into 2, 3 or 4 age classes on each logging unit is a great improvement over the neglect of these subdivisions by the process of lumping off the age of the whole unit. Any plan of regulation is better than none—but the initial plan, adopted admittedly in the absence of sufficient data, should as soon as possible give way to a plan based on accurate knowledge. Sometimes this additional data may be expensive to secure—but in the experience of the writer this is seldom the case provided the object or character of the data needed is understood, and the methods of securing it are well thought out. The expense of pre- paring the yield table, stand table and growth data for the Coconino Yellow Pine working plan was trivial compared with the value of the information secured. 173. Prediction of Yields of Mixed Hardwoods. As long as investigators are tied to the fetish of mathematical accuracy in the interpretation of the play of living forces, whose results can only be mathematically ascertained after they have occurred, just so long will we be forced to the other extreme of adopting grossly inaccurate makeshifts in regulation of yield for lack of data of approximate accuracy which can be obtained and will vastly increase the certainty of our predictions, and management. The prediction of yield in mixed hardwood forests has for many years been considered an insoluble problem. No problem is insoluble provided the methods used are in harmony with the known laws governing the growth of the forests under investigation, and provided the allowable margin of error is not set so small as to be entirely out of harmony with the purposes of the prediction. All predictions of growth for long periods are subject to correction based on actual growth (see Gurnaud method § 83) after shorter periods have elapsed, hence why insist that they must be correct in the first place or else unserviceable? A little common sense is needed in tackling the problems of predicting growth in mixed forests. This is a discussion of regulation, not of growth studies—yet there can be no permanent regulation without growth studies. Where several species exist together, they may grow at different rates. What is needed for regu- lation is the total net growth on an acre in board feet or other units (cubic feet would be more desirable as a permanent basis)—not the growth of each separate species. It is necessary to know something of the relation of these species to each other, their survival and dominance and the per cent of each in the average stand to get closer to the total production per acre, but the stand table shows this composition of the stand, and the growth study should Regulation of Even-Aged Stands 169 be based on silvicultural knowledge of relations of species. Composite yield tables while lacking the apparent reliability and superficial accuracy of those made for pure stands are perfectly practical for the present when based on site qualities, and described as to average contents. Undoubtedly the best plan is to obtain yields per acre rather than to depend upon growth of individ- ual trees in diameter as described for many-aged forests, since the former method is based on results of growth on an area basis, while the latter takes no account of forces outside the individual tree measured, hence fails to record the loss or suppression in the stand (and losses through competition between species). 174. Correlation of Regulation with Methods Proposed. Assuming that a standard “cove type” yield table has been constructed ‘which gives the relative yields per acre of this type at different ages, the problem of regulation consists, (a.) In separating the forest into component age classes, (b.) In determining the reduction per cent to apply to these age classes in order to predict the yield with the aid of the yield table. For the present the whole question of growth and future regulation is postponed by assuming the allotment plan with no growth, for cutting the mature timber. The measures which are possible are: 1. An estimate, by area, of the young timber, either by maps, or by per cents, in as many age groups as is feasible or necessary, discounting for suppression to get net area of survival as nearly as possible. 2. Separation of net remaining area of mature timber into 2 or 3 age classes based on: (a.) Mapped areas, where the form of forest permits it and average age can be obtained for each area. (b.) Diameter groups, when the first method is impossible; and cor- relation of age of these groups with age in the yield table by use of the tree of average diameter in each case, or, (c.) Further improvement on b by substituting the age of the average tree and its volume as a means of dividing the stand into 2 age groups as described in § 160. In applying this principle to mixed forests, the same method by which the average ages of plots for the yield table was determined may be used to get the age of the tree of average volume in the forest. The one requisite needed for the application of any of the methods depen- dent on the average tree for age, is a curve of growth based on diameter, which can be accepted as an average or representative curve for the type, and mixture. It will be said that with several species this is impossible. The answer is again that absolute mathematical accuracy is impossible for any method of determining an average unless all the elements are measured. An average, in forest mensuration, is used to avoid the need of complete measurements, and is not the result of total measurements. An average growth rate for several species does not presuppose that every tree in the forest must be measured for growth to insure correctness. If curves or growth showing age based on diameter for several species are weighted by 170 American Forest Regulation the average per cent of species in the type as shown by the stand table, the resultant curve will suffice for the purposes intended. Always bear in mind that forest mensuration is not exact mathematics; judgment in the use of | the figures must decide the final answer. Growth studies, either in the original stand or on cutover land, must depend as much upon the stand table or growing stock, as upon the growth of the individual trees in the stand, hence the stand table is the first essential step in making any kind of a growth study of the forest as a whole, as dis- tinguished from standard plots or sample trees. It is the growth of the forest that we must have in order to regulate it, and it is the failure of our investigators to devise simple means of coordinating growth studies with the average stand in the forest which has discredited the utility of these growth studies and prevented their proper application. 175. Coordination of Regulation with the Silvicultural Practice. Once the forest is separated into age classes by volume and area, it is no longer neces- sary to make false generalizations as to the per cent of each stand to cut. In the group selection type described under Western Yellow Pine, the per cent of the stand cut on the average acre can be coordinated easily with the age classes present and as these classes are mixed together, the assumption of a clear cut of each age class, or the removal of part of any age class and the reservation of the remainder as part of the residual growing stock, incurs no appreciable error in calculation. Where stands actually of even age are not cut clear but are culled, the initial problem of separating the areas of these stands and the calculation of growth is so simple that there is no reason why this growth data should not be codrdinated with the actual silvicultural practice. 176. Illustration for Lodgepole Pine. [For example, if lodgepole pine should be cut on a rotation of 140 years, we need a yield table with reduction factor for the average stocking of the forest, and a table of areas, volumes, and ages of the age classes. The cutting cycle may then be fixed at say 40 years. This may be based on the fact that at least 70 per cent of the area is covered by timber below 100 years old, a satisfactory percentage of which will mature in this period. If timber approaching maturity is scarce, the cycle may be prolonged and vice versa. Due regard can be shown also to the necessity of carrying over a surplus of overmature timber, but this also is best attained by prolonging the cutting cycle rather than by raising the diameter limits or increasing the per cent of each stand to be left in the first cut—factors which are more or less fixed by silvicultural and logging conditions. Following the principles laid down for the transition cutting cycle (par. 138), the stands which will represent the cut in the first cycle will embrace all whose age is above r—cc years, or from 100 years up, including the surplus of over-mature timber. The growth on these stands is found by determining the yield which they will have in ¥%4cc years, or 20 years, by taking the yield for each age class, at the increased age thus fixed, from the yield table. But to successfully transform the forest, the minimum age of stands to be cut as the operations progress over the area must be set at r— cc, or 120 years. To take a concrete case for Lodgepole pine on the Bernice working circle, Deerlodge National Forest,* where the rotation is 140 years: * Bulletin 234, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, page 35; yield table, Bul. 154, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, page 32. At 140 years, normal yield is 15,840 bd. ft. or 113 bd. ft., mean annual growth per acre. Regulation of Even-Aged Stands 171 Since the reduction factor on this forest was applied, in estimating, to each age class separately, the growth per acre can be predicted separately as well, for these age classes by using the correct reduction per cent for each age class. But to simplify the illus- tration an average factor will be adopted. On the basis of area stocked: i.e, stocking reduced to normal acres, which weighs equally all age classes, the density factor averages 49 per cent. But on the basis of comparative present volume which gives greatest weight to the older age classes, the density factor is but 33% per cent. The latter ratio will be adopted for the first two cutting cycles for this reason. The empirical yield table then becomes, TABLE 16. Yield Table for Bernice Division, Deerlodge National Forest. Lodgepole Pine. Reduction to 33% per cent. Age Age Age Age Age Wearce bd it.' Yearssesbdurt)) Years’ © Bdsit. (Years (Bdsite, Mears: « Bdtt. 30 180 60 1,620 90 3,160 120 4,540 150 5,640 40 640 70 2,140 100 3,640 130 4,920 160 5,960 50 1,120 80 2,680 IIO 4,100 140 5,280 170 6,240 The areas in the working circle are: Age Area Present yield Age Area Present yield years acres M. bd. ft. years acres M. bd. ft. 10 TAG O, ee et ener ere 70 1,928 4,125 20 OV Az ee eres 80 2,448 6,560 30 5,511 QgI 90 2,002 6,620 40 7,559 4,837 100 3,040 4,085 50 1,412 1,581 110 306 1,623 60 4,887 7,916 70 1,928 4,125 Total 39,238 M 80 2,448 6,560 120 to 160 14,443 160 to 200 2,844 Total 53,603 M over 200 474 Total Acres 58,346 92,841 M The present volume in stands containing merchantable timber is 92,831 M bd. ft. of which 80 per cent is Lodgepole; therefore, growth can be based solely on Lodgepole without incurring too great an error. Of this, 53,603 M bd. ft. is in stands 120 years and over in age. Trial Calculation to Determine the Cutting Cycle. First Trial. The area now occupied by mature timber is 33 per cent of the total area stocked. On this basis, and to aid in establishing a cutting cycle approximately %r, the cycle will be first tested at 40 years. The per cent of cut will be 66 or two-thirds of the present stand. The minimum of exploitable age will be set at r— “cc or 120 years. The cut for the first 40-year cycle will be but 66 per cent of each stand leaving 34 per cent for the next cycle. This is approximated as the average per cent to leave. The older stands will be cut more heavily, and the younger, more lightly. Growth in all stands is computed for %cc or 20 years. On the older stands, above 120 years, an average of 37 board feet per year is calculated from the yield table and applied to all stands. This gives, on 17,761 acres, for 20 years, a total of 13,143 M board feet. A more accurate method can be applied, which will be illustrated in the case of the stands below 120 years. Since the volume and age of each stand is known and there- fore its relative density, the growth should be predicted directly on the existing stands. 172 American Forest Regulation This can be done by determining the per cent of increase shown by the yield table for a 20-year period for each age class, and applying this per cent to the present volume. For 110-year class this is 497° or 120 per cent. 4100 For 100-year class it is 454° or 124.7 per cent. 3640 The yield of these stands in 20 years is then, For 110-year class, 1,623 M plus 20 per cent or 1,947 M. For 1oo-year class, 4,085 M plus 24.7 per cent or 6,216 M. Total 8,163 M. The total volume to be cut within the 40-year cycle is, Volume of stands 120 years and older 53,603 M. Growth at 37 bd. ft. per acre annually 13,143 M. Volume and growth in 110 and 100-year stands 8,163 M. Total _ 74,909 M. 66 per cent to be cut 49,439 M. Annual cut, 1/4oth 1,235 M. At the beginning of the second cycle, the 34 per cent left from these stands has already laid on an average of 20-years growth, and will lay on 20 years additional growth before cutting during this 40-year cycle. The growth of these thinned stands cannot be predicted with certainty, but such data as is available tend to show that the species has marked recuperation powers even to the age of 400 years. Hence it is fair to assume that on the remaining stand the growth will equal that laid on in the first cycle, or 37 bd. ft. per acre. For 40 years and on 21,197 acres, this equals 31,371 M bd. ft. Upon the residual stand of 25,470 M bd. ft. Or a total of 66,841 M bd. ft. To this must be added the yield of stands now between 100 and 60 years of age, which will grow for 40 years in the first cycle and an average of 20 years during the second cycle before cutting. Using the same method of percentages as for the first cycle, these are, for 60 years’ growth, For 90-year stands 5640 or 178 per cent. 3160 5280 2680 70-year stands 4920 or 230 per cent. 2140 So-year stands or 197 per cent. 60-year stands 4549 or 280 per cent. 1620 The yields of these classes will then be, lor go-year stands at 150 years, 6,620 M, plus 78 per cent or 11,883 M. For 80-year stands at 140 years, 6,560 M, plus 97 per cent or 12,923 M. For 7o-year stands at 130 years, 4,125 M, plus 130 per cent or 9,487 M. For 60-year stands at 120 years, 7,916M, plus 180 per cent or 22,164 M. Total 56,457 M. Regulation of Even-Aged Stands 173 If 66 per cent of these stands is cut as before, this gives a cut of 37,261 M. This, with the older thinned stands gives a total cut of 104,102 M. and an annual cut of 1/40, or 2,605 M. Thus by the plan of cutting but #4 of each stand now, at a sacrifice of 637M bd. ft. per year of the possible cut, it appears that the probable cut in the next cycle will be more than doubled. If the stands are cut clean the respective cuts will be, For the first cycle 74,909 M. annual cut 1,872 M. For the second cycle 56,457 M. annual cut 1,411 M. Total for both cycles 131,366 M. Total, if % is cut 153,541 M, plus a reserve, in this case of 19,196 M or a total gain in production by the second method of 41,371'M in 80 years or 517M per year, which is about 32 per cent of the average 80-year cuts of 1,642 M by the first or clear cutting method. In effect, such a system is equivalent to lengthening the rotation by at least 20 years. These figures are given to illustrate the method by which different cutting cycles and rotations may be tested, to determine the actual yields and to decide upon the proper factors to use in regulation. They serve also to bring out the enormous influence of growth upon the volume of the possible cut. If the discrepancy between the predicted cut for the first two cycles appears too great, the cut for the first cycle can be increased, and made more nearly equal with the second, by shortening this cycle and removing the surplus of timber above the age of 140 years in a shorter period. It is suggested that the student perform one or more of these calculations by the methods indicated. 177. Summary of Principles for American Regulation. The European allotment principle attains progress towards regulation by transferring stands whose age classifies them with a given fixed period, into an earlier or later period for cutting, thus equalizing the areas reproduced within the period by advancing or retarding the normal age of exploitation for specific stands. The periods are of fixed length, equal to a definite proportion of the rotation, and as the cutting cycle is usually % to %4 of this short period, there is no difficulty in reaching and cutting any stand when needed. In America the cutting cycle or length of time elapsing between successive cuts is determined by transportation costs and frequently becomes the govern- ing principle of cutting and hence of regulation. The first principle of securing sustained yield in America is therefore to determine the length of the first cutting cycle so as to fix the amount of the annual cut, on the basis of a determined cut per acre. As an aid in this deter- mination, the growth on cutover lands, in selection or group cuttings, and the growth on cutover lands plus the young stands which mature, in even- aged forests, will be measured to indicate the annual cut possible in the second cycle. The annual cut in the two cycles can best be equalized by lengthening or shortening the first cutting cycle, the former reducing the cut in the first cycle and increasing it in the second, and vice versa. Where more than two cycles are apportioned to a rotation, the per cent of the rotation assigned to the remaining cycles may be made proportional to the per cent of,the area of the working circle, occupied by timber whose 174 American Forest Regulation age classes it with these cycles. The first two cycles can usually include all the timber now merchantable. The working out of this principle is well illustrated by the above case, and as set forth it constitutes what has been termed the “American” method of regulation whose characteristics are, determination and equalization of the annual cut on basis of volume, by means of varying the length of the first and second cutting cycles, and determination of the actual annual cut by using the principle of a felling reserve and cutting series with a minimum exploitable age of r— '%4cc years and an allotment of areas or stands for cutting within the period, down to and including r—cc years. Just to the extent that the per cent of the stand per acre, in many-aged forests, or the per cent of the total area of a logging unit, in even-aged stands, which must be cut, can be reduced because of increased accessibility and better transportation condi- tions, does the cutting cycle lose its controlling force in regulation, and the need for basing regulation on length of this cycle, and upon the cutting series and felling reserve which is created by it, diminishes, until with short cycles of 5 to8 years and perfect transportation, the allotment principle of regulation may be applied without regard to the cutting cycle. But these conditions are for the future in many sections of the West, and the principles above described will be applied in cutting whether or not they are recognized as they should be in regulation. 178. Quiz. Can these principles be applied to even-aged stands? or to Eastern mixed hardwoods? How could the mixed hardwoods of the Southern Appalachians be regulated under present conditions? Why must regulation be coordinated with silvicultural practice? How can the annual cut in two cutting cycles be best equalized? Why is this better than an allotment of areas for cutting within a definite period? When should an allotment method be used? Fae, EN, 1 Pe CONTENTS A. (a) Forest Management in Nine European States (from Martin), page 175. (b) Financial Rotations (from Endres), page 200. B. Growing Stock and Yield, Harvard Forest, page 204. C. Example of a Preliminary Policy Statement for Inyo National Forest, page 205. D. Results of Forest Management in Savoie, France, page 208. E. Examples of Yield Calculations from National Forest Management Plans, 1921, page 210. F. Comment on Wolff Formula, page 212. APPENDIX A. (a) FOREST MANAGEMENT IN NINE EUROPEAN STATES. The data on European management is a free and condensed and not a literal trans- lation of the third edition of H. Martin’s Forsteinrichtung. The wording has frequently been simplified but without changing the real meaning nor diminishing the value of the original text. The synonyms management plan, and working plan have been freely varied. In some instances considerable liberty has been taken in completely rearrang- ing the text. But in adhering to a translation at all, the “English” has had to be sacri- ficed to a considerable extent. The use of brackets to simplify some of the involved and complex German sentences perhaps has been carried to extremes but seems necessary to make the text understandable. The following countries are included: (1) Prussia, (2) Bavaria, (3) Kingdom of Saxony, (4) Wurtemberg, (5) Baden, (6) Grand Duchy of Hesse, (7) Grand Duchy of Saxony, (8) Alsace-Lorraine, (9) Austria. Martin’s comment on French regulation © has been omitted since this is discussed in great detail in the text and in the Appendix of “Studies in French Forestry.” Accepted principles proven by these discussions have been embodied in the main text of this book. I. PRUSSIA. (Page 223)* During the nineteenth century the allotment method was the dominant method of regulating the yield in Prussia. It came into use through G. L. Hartig, in the form of the strict volume allotment (Massenfachwerk). According to the Instructions of 1819 the yield was to be shown for all periods of the 120 year rotation (or period of organization), separated into main and preliminary yield, divided into classes (timber, split fuelwood, round billets, brushwood). This method of Hartig’s on account of the “circumstantiality” of the calculations (for which a satisfactory basis was lacking), could not long be maintained. The elaboration of working plans progressed too slowly. Therefore new instructions were issued in the year 1836 by Oberlandforstmeister von * Figures in brackets denote the page in Martin’s Forsteinrichtung, third edition, and thus facilitate reference to the original text. Mrs. Fernow, who kindly read the translation to Dr. Fernow, writes that Dr. Fernow . “thinks you have generally improved on Martin, whose style is certainly most cumbrous” ... . It should be noted that “abtheilung” means lot when “jagen” signifies compartment, but lot is usually the translation of ‘“unterabtheilung” when the compartment is denoted by the German word “abtheilung.” An excellent way of mastering the variations and similarities of regulation in the foregoing states is to read through the translation subject by subject as well as country by country. For example take the subject of allotment by periods and it is instructive to find that all states have usually abandoned the cumbrous and methodical scheme of actually alloting stands to periods 40, and 60 years hence. 176 American Forest Regulation Reuss, after summary yield determinations for the State forests had been carried on in the years 1826 to 1835; these instructions continued to be used almost to the end of the nineteenth century; to be sure, they are also based on volume-allotment but they simplified the yield calculations and took area into consideration. At the same time attention was paid to a proper distribution of age classes and regulation of a felling series. In harmony with these instructions for the elaboration of working plans, two different kinds of allotment came into use according to the stand conditions in each case: (a) The combined allotment (Fachwerk) which was preferably to be applied to irregular stands. (b) The area allotment (Flaechenfachwerk) which under regular conditions was considered sufficient. Usually only simple areas formed the basis. In recent times the yield calculations were limited more and more to the first period and the allotment for later periods was often entirely omitted. In other directions simplifi- cations were also introduced. The most important essential prescriptions of the method in present use are as follows: 1. Prescriptions for the Elaboration of New Working Plans. (1) Preliminary Dis- cussion. Before beginning the work of regulation preliminary discussion takes place between the district forester, inspector and supervisor, in which (on the basis of the detailed results of the former management), propositions for the future management are laid down. This discussion is centered on: the system of roads and division lines, the boundaries, maps and survey, the condition of the forest, the previous and future management, and the method to be followed in the organization of working plans. 2. Administrative Subdivision; (a) Working Groups and Management Classes. The formation of working groups is a special peculiarity of the Prussian State Forest management. Already in the instructions of Frederick the Great this is prescribed. To justify the formation of groups it is stated: “Partly the size of the forests united into one supervisorship and partly differences in portions of these forests as regards methods of management, condition of stands, market, or servitudes, make it desirable or necessary not only to regulate the cut for sustained yield for the Forest as a whole, but to divide it into more or less independent organic parts of the whole forest forming main management units or groups, within which the sustained yield management can be either introduced immediately or at least prepared for by the establishment of ordered age classes.” (P. 225) According to present practice each protection district forms a group. Such coppice forests that are to form a felling series by themselves, as well as coppice under standards and selection forests, for which a special working plan is to be made, are segregated as special working groups. Besides the division into groups, the formation of management classes is also insti- tuted in Prussia. The reasons for these are first of all to be found in the occurrence of the four groups of timber species on large areas (oak, beech and other hardwoods, softwoods, and conifers), and further in differences of management (especially as regards rotation). (b) Permanent Subdivisions (Wirthschaftsfiguren). The prescriptions given for the subdivision essentially agree with the rules given in the first section of the first part (of this volume), which are derived from Prussian practice. This subdivision into permanent subdivisions (Wirtschaftsfiguren), which are here called compartments (Jagen), is made by a network of straight lines, which cut. each other as nearly as possible at right angles. The rides (Gestelle) are to be laid out from east to west and from south to north or parallel and perpendicular to an intersecting main road or railway. Where danger from wind is to be feared, the dividing lines are to be so laid that they form an angle of 45 degrees towards the most dangerous wind direction. In mountain forests the division is to ke made on the basis of the network of roads. “The roads are to form the shortest possible connection to market or to means of communication with the market; they are to be planned in relation to each other, to cross mountains over passes and to be located so as to be easily built. The grade Appendix 177 is not to exceed 6% except when thereby a specially favorable location of the roads can be secured.” The shape of the management units is to be as regular as possible without acute angles, so far as possible facing in one direction and bounded or intersected by roads in such a manner that all the wood cut in them can be readily moved to the highways. If the boundaries are not formed by roads, either natural boundaries should be relied upon or cultural limits, railroads or rides (Schneisen, which as far as possible are located in the direction of the steepest grade). The size of the permanent management units is to average 50 to 75 acres—in spruce 25 to 62. The main rides of a compartment division, which run approximately from east to west, are marked with Roman (p. 226) capitals; the “fire-rides” which are perpendicular to these, are marked with small letters. The compartments in the plains are numbered from east to west, proceeding from south to north. In mountainous territory, sections of country of uniform character are combined into groups and numbered accordingly. (c) Stand Divisions. The differences in the stands to be found within the permanent compartments are segregated as lots (Abtheilungen and Unterabtheilungen). Com- partments are segregated, if the limits of the stand are likely to remain permanent and either coincide with rides, roads, watercourses, etc. or can be laid out on lines suitable for roads, which are then marked with posts and direction ditches. In all other cases, especially when the difference is to be obliterated in the course of the first period, a segregation as lots suffices, the boundaries of which are not indicated and marked locally. Severance fellings and safety lines are to be segregated as lots. Compart- ments are denoted by small Latin letters, the lots by the compartment letters with a small number (a’, a’). 3. Site and Stand Survey. (a) Description and Valuation of Sites. For the geo- logical description of the soil and for its composition the geologic-agronomic maps of the Geological Survey on the scale of 1 to 25,000 are to be used. As regards termin- ology, that of the German Forest Experiment Stations is to be followed. The site class is to be estimated on the basis of the Experiment Station yield tables. The average height of the main stand, ascertained by a few measurements, serves as measure of the site value. (b) Description of Stand. This is to be brief. Uniform stands of regular character are sufficiently described by stating the species, age, and the full yield. Striking defects of the stand are to be specially noted. In uneven-aged stands in which the age classes gradually merge into each other, the age limits and the average age are to be stated. If several age classes are strictly differentiated, the age of the classes is to be noted (p. 227). The degree of density is to be estimated specially for the different species. Their sum must coincide with the total density of the entire stand. 4. Age Class Table. This table forms the most important numerical basis of the working plan in the timber forest; in it the stands are arranged according to sequence of the groups, compartments and lots. In mixed stands, and in those containing different age classes, the areas are divided according to the proportion of these dif- ferences. The area (to be determined by survey or estimate), which each species and each separately stated age class occupies (within a compartment or lot) is entered on a separate line. Thus it is possible where mixed stands predominate to record the species more correctly than can be done, if, in the table the whole area is assigned to the dominant species. The areas are compiled, separately according to the four species groups and, if several management classes are involved, also separately for these, by groups and in totals. If it appears desirable to record and compile the stands according to site class parcels, this may be done. On the basis of such data it is possible to calculate or estimate the actual and normal growing stock of the age classes and of the total forest. 5. Regulating the Cut. (a) Standard of Measure. The measure for the amount of cut and the proof of sustained yield is the normal periodic area. This is determined for each management class according to the relation of the length of the period (= 20 178 American Forest Regulation years) to the rotation. For the working groups it is not necessary to adhere to the normal felling area. With irregular age classes corresponding changes are made. The area of the first period is to be made smaller when there is a deficiency,—larger when a surplus of mature timber exists. Under difficult (cultural) conditions and especially when species with long regeneration periods are involved, the first and second periods are to have felling areas allotted. In cases where the sequence of cuts has special significance the progress of fellings is to be shown for a longer period. The felling areas of the first period are listed separately according to species, groups and manage- ment classes, group by group and for the whole forest. For the areas of latter periods and the segregation of stands according to species, groups and management classes are not required. (b) Choice of the Stands to be Regencrated (p. 228). The correct choice of the stands of the present period of management is considered one of the most important tasks of organization. It is essential that the stands are utilized at time of maturity, that the most suitable felling series is established, the sustained yield assured, and the most suitable species regenerated. (c) Rotation. The (official) determination of the rotation for the main species is reserved for the Minister. The proposals for the length of the rotation are to be stated and argued in the preliminary proceedings. For a decision on the length of rotation, data are to be secured in suitable “reviers” (before the organization takes place) for the most important species and the most commonly occurring sites; the stumpage prices (free of logging cost) per cubic meter of timber for the most important age classes can thus be studied. 6. Determination of Timber Volumes and Cut. (a) Main cut. The allotment of the cut (main and intermediate) is done according to the instructions for keeping the control book. The yield (main cut) is composed of the present volume plus the incre- ment for the next ten years. All volume data refer to timber and are separately listed according to the four species groups already mentioned. The determination of the volume of the first period is made by calipering all stems, unless a simpler method appears satisfactory. For the calculation of the volumes the volume tables of the German Forest Experiment Stations are as a rule to be used. The volume of the young regular stands is estimated by yield tables or ascertained by samiple plots. The increment percents are cited according to the yield tables; for open stands simple increment investigations are to be undertaken. The annual felling budget is then obtained by dividing the sum of the volumes assigned to the first period by 20 (i.e. years in period). (b) Intermediate Cuts (p. 229). To furnish a definite basis for the execution of thinnings, a plan is elaborated in which the areas of the stands to be thinned or cleaned in the next decade—separated into those under and over 40 years—are enumerated. The division of these areas by ten gives the yearly thinning area. If the stands are to be thinned twice (or thrice) in one decade their area is added again (or three times). The exact year of the thinning is not dictated for each stand. The felling budget for the intermediate cut is estimated on the basis of the yields which the intermediate cuts... . . have furnished on the average in recent years, excluding unusually high or low yields. The average is increased or decreased if the annual area to be thinned deviates considerably from the area annually thinned (in the years used for comparison) or if other reasons give occasion for it (especially changes in the thinning technique). 7. Coppice and Selection Forest Organization. (a) Coppice. Extensive coppice forests are segregated as special working groups. Every group is to contain a number of annual felling areas corresponding to the rotation and with approximately equal areas. The felling areas are chosen according to their maturity and with regard to a satisfactory felling series. It is generally considered sufficient to determine in each group the number of felling areas and the year of their cutting, without peso the individual areas in the field or on the map. Lots are not segregated. The yields of timber and brush are to be estimated on the basis of former results. Appendix 179 The annual cut is found by dividing the number of years of the rotation into the sum of the yield of all felling areas segregated by the species groups. (b) Selection Forest. The regulation of the cut is simple. A segregation of lots within the compartments is as a rule to be avoided. In the age class table the areas by species and age classes are to be estimated and stated separately. The ascertain- ment of the growing stock stem by stem is not necessary. All wood yield is to be booked as main cut. (P. 230) The cuts for each management unit of the first period are estimated from yield tables according to the maturity (of the parts) of the stand for the middle of the period, segregating (as usual) the four species groups; or are estimated by calipering. If the selection forest forms a special group the average increment for every manage- ment unit is estimated and the total increment revealed thereby is to be considered as prescribed cut (felling budget), in so far as the age group proportion does not reveal a lack or excess of growing stock, or the character of the stands does not necessitate a greater or reduced cut. Wherever the selection forest has been in existence for a considerable time the future prescribed cut may be deduced from a consideration of the changes in the age group relations consequent upon the application of the previous felling budget. For a check on the progress of fellings a return period of ten years is as a rule established. II. Control and Development of Working Plans. A. Control. For control of the management and for the development of the working plan there is: (1) the Control book, (2) the Ledger, and (3) the Area Register. (1) The Control Book serves as a check on the estimates and fellings, and consists of three parts. The first part (A) contains for every permanent stand a special record in which are entered annually, all fellings divided into main and intermediate, with the amount of the material realized. The main cut includes those cuts of the main stand which either produce an entire renewal of the stand or such a culling as to necessitate its entire renewal or filling in, or if there is a considerable diminution of the main yield as determined by the stock taking. The intermediate cut includes: (a) thinnings in the lower story; (b) fellings of single stems and groups carried out for the benefit of the main stand, which do not necessitate a renewal of the stand and (p. 231) which do not exceed 5% of the prescribed main yield (cleanings, improvement cuttings); (c) fellings which take place in consequence of injuries to the forest without, however, necessitating restocking, and without diminishing the prescribed main felling by more than 5%. Fellings from (a) to (c) which take place in stands of the current working period, are to be considered as main fellings. All yields of the coppice under standards and selection forest are also reckoned as main fellings. When the cut prescribed by the working plan (in the main felling of the timber forest) is completed, the realized yields of timber are summed up and transferred to the second part (A:) (see page 180) and here compared with the estimated yields. The intermediate yields are excluded from this transfer as is also the root and brush-wood. Every three years the part A: is balanced; it is then calculated whether the stand divisions (re final cut) during these three years have yielded more or less than the estimated yield and what amount of wood above the estimate may be utilized or how much the felling budget must be reduced (to make up for a deficit). The third part (C:) contains the annual comparison of the cut in timber with the estimated amount, taking into consideration the changes demanded by the results of part A:. Excess or deficit in one year’s fellings (as compared with the felling budget) is used for the determination of the usable volume of fellings added or subtracted from the felling budget. The result (the remainder or the sum) constitutes the standard for the following economic year; the permissible cut (in the main felling) may only be exceeded by 10% at the highest, without Ministerial permission. No limitation exists in this direction for intermediate returns; they are controlled only by area (and silvicultural practice). 2. The Ledger (Hauptmerkbuch). This aims (in conjunction with the Control 180 American Forest Regulation Book and the Area Register) at furnishing the bases for the control, proving and (p. 232) correction of the forest management. “It is to form a history of the Revier, which enables one to see the development and changes of conditions in the whole Revier as well as in its integral parts, and furnishes to the succeeding administrator a knowledge of events influencing the management, the measures adopted, the work performed, the observations and experiences had, at the same time permitting at any time the oversight of the status of the management, and hence also furnishing the needful basis for new organization work.” In conformity with these purposes the Ledger is divided into a general and a special part. The general part, arranged according to subjects, contains in historical sequence those noteworthy changes, phenomena and occurrences which concern the whole Revier or large parts of it and are of a general nature; it takes up the noteworthy data recorded in the course of management as well as any suggestions regarding improvements. The special part of the Ledger is intended to record the events and changes occurring in the individual compartments; especially the changes in the stand produced by fellings and forestation; the logging costs are specified and explained. Certain sheets of a special map on a scale of 1:5,000, made for the use of the supervisor, form an addition to the Ledger and to the Area Register; on these are entered the changes in boundaries, the methods of using the soil and the stand changes made by fellings and forestation. If a road system has been planned, a road system map is put into the Ledger on the scale of 1: 25,000, and also a blank map (on the same scale) on which the finished roads are entered. Detailed instructions for the correction of the maps are given in the manual. 3. The Area Register. The status of the area of the reviers is controlled in its entirety by the Area Register, which consists of four parts: Section A, the map register, records all existing maps, surveys and working plan data; Section B records all area changes which have been begun; in Section C the entire area of the Revier is con- trolled and Section D records the transfer of soil intended for wood production to areas not intended for wood production and vice versa. B. Intermediate Revision (p. 233). The working plan is revised at the close of the first period (usually 20 years), but, in view of disturbances and changes in management occurring during the course of the period, an intermediate examination is undertaken in the eleventh year. To prepare for this the supervisor has to balance up the most important control books having reference to fellings and forestation. In a plenary conference, then taking place, a discussion ensues whether and in what respect there has been deviation from the regulations of the working plan or whether there is to be such deviation in the future. The working plan is then checked and revised as follows: (1) All changes in the felling time of stand$ of the first period; (2) the budget for the main yield according to the urgency of the necessary changes; (3) the felling budget of the intermediate yield; (4) the thinning plan for the next decade; and (5) if necessary, the road building plan. II. BAVARIA. The most important basis for forest organization has been up to this time the Instruc- tions of 1830 together with some supplementary directions. Essential prescriptions are also contained in the basic protocols and the revisional notes of the ministry on the individual working plans. New directions for working plans are soon to be expected. The most important points which characterize the past procedure are the following: (1) Preliminary Work and Bases (p. 234) (a) Subdivision. Large forests are segregated into districts, i.e. separate forest regions formed by natural conditions, units of contiguous location; they generally are named. The permanent units of management (formed by systematic division), and which are marked by Arabic numbers, are called compartments. They are formed in the plain by straight rides (Schneisen). In the mountains the division lines are adapted to the contours and connected up with the road system. Moreover the compartments depend on forest conditions and management. Their size and shape are often very dissimilar. Appendix 185 Changes in the existing division are avoided as much as possible. No positive direc- tions are given for the size of compartments. Varying parts of the compartments are separated as lots (marked with a, b, etc.). As regards their size no general prescrip- tions are given, but as a rule they are not to be less than 2% acres. Differences in stand within the lots (wind fall openings, regeneration groups, etc.) are recognized by numerical exponents (a’, a*. . . .). Regarding the character and the direction of the fellings, general prescriptions are given in the management plan (which are elaborated for working units) and special prescriptions for periodic fellings. (b) Basic Protocol (p. 235). Before beginning the survey the main features of the plan of management are to be determined. This is done in a council of commissioners. This has reference to all conditions which are of essential influence on the wood pro- duction (soil, situation, increment, yield, market, legal conditions, etc.). Moreover the former management (in its most important technical and economic aspects) is dis- cussed. The future management plan in its main features is determined from the ‘previous plan. At the same time there is given here the basis for the segregation of working groups occasioned by difference of species and of rotation. The results of this council meeting are recorded in a “basic protocol.” (c) Description and Determinaticn of Cut. The permanent bases for determining the cut (especially the site conditions) are stated for entire compartments, so far as no essential differences occur in their component parts. The conditions which are of a temporary nature, especially the stand conditions and measures of management, are stated for the lots. The description of the stand is to emphasize in the briefest possible manner the conditions which are of moment to the management, especially the domi- nant species, the mixtures, growth, density, and age. The age classes were hitherto so formed that each class comprised a period of a quarter of the rotation. In the future, the age classes will be established with 20-year periods (I. Class, 1-20 years, etc.). The determination of the growing stock is by complete calipering for the stands that are to be exploited during the next period, unless simpler methods are indicated by former surveys or by experience of past management. The growing stock of later periods, as far as it is to be determined at all, is to be estimated from yield tables on the basis of average increment. 2. Working Plan. (a) Method of Regulating the Yield. The former method of yield regulation was a combined (area and volume) allotment (p. 236) method (Fach- werk) with 24-year periods. In recent times the yield regulation is confined to the next period, which in future will comprise only 20 years. The allotment of the areas is done by working groups, beginning with those under the longest rotation. Within the group the stands.are enumerated according to the order of numbers of the districts, compartments, and lots. The working plan is to furnish a control over the manage- ment planned. The prescriptions are, however, so formulated that the management is not rigidly fixed for long periods. The allotment of the stands to the periods of the working plan is based largely on average age. Deviations from this rule are indicated by the condition of the stands and considerations of the establishment of a good felling series (which is helped by suitable severance fellings). (b) Determination of the Felling Budget. The yield of the stands (lots) is calculated by adding to the present volume the increment for half the period. The felling budget for the main cut is determined by multiplying the felling area corresponding to the . a . . F . rotation (° , if rotations vary for separated working groups) with the average wood T volume of the area unit of the stands to be felled. To this are added the volumes of deferred fellings and accidental yields. In case of irregular age class conditions suitable increases or decreases of the felling areas are made. The budget is stated in toto, not separated by species. The yields (special estimates by yield tables) of intermediate fellings are given only for the first half of the first period. The total volume of thinnings is also stated in 182 American Forest Regulation per cent of the total yield and per acre of forest area. The annual budget of the intermediate yield is from estimated total volume divided by the number of years. (c) Special Management Plan. To give the management needful suppleness it is a rule to allot in the working plan more areas than correspond to the debit of utilization. Stands are allotted to the working plan (which in future is to be made for 10 or 20 years), which contain 15 to 30 times the yearly budget (p. 237). This affords the possi- bility of multiplying felling areas and making gradual progress with regeneration fellings. The “basic protocols” give directions to the supervisors for the location of fellings. Besides the felling plan there is a special forestation plan, which contains a list of forestation cost estimates arranged by lots. Plans are also prepared for the construc- tion and maintenance of roads (and eventually for the most important secondary uses). 3. Control and Revision. The control of the fellings and stock estimates are carried on as in Prussia: (a) By annual comparison of the total cut with the budget. The tabulation gives’ the main cut, intermediate cut, and total cut. (b) By periodic comparison of the felling results with the estimates for each lot, which is carried in a special record. At the end of the to-year working period this Control Book is balanced. The periodic examination and revision of working plans, which may be either simple or comprehensive, is done by the Forest Revisions Bureau (Waldstandsrevisionen). The plans are “comprehensive,” if important changes become necessary through extra- ordinary natural phenomena or for other reasons. Essentially, the revisions are carried on as in Prussia. III. KINGDOM OF SAXONY. The forest organization for a long time has been carried on by a separate bureau (Forsteinrichtungsanstalt), which has had special advantages for its development. Through this special bureau, the personnel is well trained and a uniform execution of (p. 238) all survey work is secured. The results of the working plans can be more effectively worked over and their relation to other technical branches (experiments, administration, economics, statistics) more appropriately kept in view. In Saxony too the yield regulation is based on the allotment method (Fachwerkmethode). H. Cotta, who systematically carried on the survey and organization of the Saxon State Forests in the years 1811-1831, advocated the area allotment as well as the combined allotment. Due to the regularly recurring revisions, it was early recognized that the yield calcula- tions for later periods were superfluous. The allotment for these was therefore abandoned and the yield regulated only for the next decade. The most important points characteristic of the Saxon procedure have reference to (1) the preliminary work of estimating, (2) the determination of the felling budget and felling areas, (3) the control and revision. 1. The Preliminary Work. The subdivision into permanent management units (com- partments) is (in the plains and in gently sloping country) done by a system of straight lines intersecting as far as possible at right angles. The main lines, so-called Wirth- schaftsstreifen (management lines or strips) run in most reviers of Saxony from north- east to southwest. They serve as boundaries of the felling series and are 9 yards wide, in order that along their limits breaks (i.e., severance fellings) may be formed as a protection against wind damage. The rides, which are located at right angles to the management strips are to indicate the direction of the annual felling areas and as a rule are 4.5 yards wide. In mountain reviers too, in the middle of the last century, the subdivision was carried out on similar principles, except that the division lines conform to the more important contour lines (ridges and saddles). With the progress in making roads (which came about independently of the subdivisions), many lines were replaced by roads. A sudden and systematic change of the existing subdivisions (as was carried on in the Prussian mountain districts) could not be carried out because of the prevalence of spruce, so Appendix 183 liable to windfall, and because of the straight division lines along which severance fellings are made. In working out road systems (in each case), it is investigated whether and how far the roads are to be used as division lines and what changes (of the latter) are to be made in consequence of the new road system. The (p. 239) lots (stands) mainly due to differences of age, are segregated down to a minimum area of % acre. Binding rules are not given, however, in this regard. Local marking of the limits of lots is not attempted unless existing lines can serve. On account of the uniformity of stand conditions the descriptions of lots are made brief—in tabulated form. The soil classification is made by site and stand qualities. The former gives expression to the normal, the latter to the actual conditions of pro- duction. The segregation of sites is made according to the Instructions for Forest Experiment Stations. The stand quality is expressed in simple numbers, which show the combined effect of site and condition of stand. The age classes are stated in 20- year gradations (I. class 1-20 years, II. class 21-40 years, etc.). Each age class is again subdivided into decades. The resulting classification in decades is also shown on the stand maps. To ascertain the growing stock, the volumes of the stands below 40 years are calculated on the basis of yield tables (based on stand quality and age classes). The stock of stands over 40 years is ascertained by ocular estimate, which is done at each ten-year main revision. Calipering is the exception. With regular stand conditions, the predomi- nance of clear cutting, uniform stand management, the exact statistics of the results of former management plans, and the ability of the permanent personnel, the ocular estimate has hitherto given good results. 2. The Determination of the Annual Felling Budget. Rotation. (a) Measure of Utilization. If a clear cutting system is employed, the normal annual felling area furnishes an easily applicable measure of the annual cut. The determination of the rotation depends chiefiy on expert judgment (based on existing rotations, on the requitements of the market, and on the price (p. 240) relations of the timber size classes). To determine the normal rotations investigations were formerly made for the spruce (which occurs throughout the whole country) and index per cents were calculated for characteristic stands. For the calculation of the volume increments per cents ample material is on hand. The calculation of the value increment per cent is based on the auction prices of the various timber size classes, which compose the average cubic meter of the stands of the various age classes. The value relations of the log sizes (which are classified according to a middle diameter of 6, 6-8, 8-11, 11-14, over 14 inches) indicate the value increment per cent. With regular stand conditions the normal felling area is observed as accurately as possible, which offers no difficulties in the prevailing clear cutting system. Under irregular conditions deviations become necessary. The age class condition serves as an indication of the degree to which these appear desirable or allowable. If the older age classes are in excess, more area is included in the felling budget, and vice versa. Great stress is therefore laid on an accurate estimate of the age classes. (b) Determination of Felling Areas. For felling during the next period of manage- ment, stands are chosen, which, according to age, soil, and stand conditions are mature in order of the need for felling. Next in importance in the choice of the felling areas is the regulation of the felling series. Since the spruce predominates, this consideration is of great importance for the whole country. Regard for the danger of windfall demands that the fellings proceed in a direction opposite to the dominant wind. Since the annual clear cuttings remain narrow and only gradually merge, the general rule is that the felling series remain short. In order to satisfy the demands of these felling rules and to counteract the dangers which the segregation (or grouping) of large, even-aged stands may provoke, it is necessary that one have command of a sufficient number of points of attack. To secure these, the boundaries of the stands must early be accustomed to an open position through the formation of low crowns, especially where those stands are located so as to be exposed to storm by the removal of old stands in front of them. This is accom- 184 American Forest Regulation plished by making the management strips sufficiently wide, by severance fellings, and by cutting around those stands that can still develop a wind firm belt. (P. 241) The most important task of forest organization lies in properly locating the order of the felling areas. The contiguous felling areas assigned to the next management period should not be larger than the rules of the progress of fellings justify. The future formation of the felling series (their continuation, interruption, etc.) is dependent on conditions which (at the time of the making of the working plans) can not yet be foreseen. (c) The Justification of the Felling Budget. The felling budget is listed separately as main cut, clearings, and intermediate cuttings (thinnings, cleanings and accidental cut- tings). After the felling area has been decided upon, the main felling budget is based on an ocular estimate of the growing stock (on the felling area). Estimating has proven sufficiently accurate for purposes of fixing the budget. To control the total estimated volume, the amounts per acre (of felling area) are compared with the results of the last decade’s fellings; important deviations from the average hitherto obtained must be justified. The actual annual increment (which is calculated according to sites and age classes with the aid of the yield tables) also indicates the felling budget. To compare the increment thus obtained with the yield possibility of the revier, the normal increment is also calculated by site classes. The probable yields from thinnings are estimated on the basis of the results of the last decade (with the aid of yield tables) taking into special consideration the condition of the stands. The separation of broadleaves and conifers is made only if broadleaves form a substantial amount (of the stand). 3. Statistics. The data collected by the working plans bureau (for every revier and for the whole country) date back to 1817, or in part to 1844. The importance of perma- nent records for working plans (p. 242) can best be shown by the Saxon yield statistics; therefore their results may find place here. The most important data are: 1. The Age Classes. In the State Forest the present condition of the age classes is: Class I II Ill IV V WA Open and bare :: Totals Per cent 28 21 25 18 II 2 us 100 2. The Sites. According to the last accounts the qualities are: I Il ie IV V Average quality Site qualities %: 3 36 49 II I si 27 Stand qualities %: I 16 53 25 2 ai Sr18 3. Growing Stock. This has in the second half of the 19th century increased from 152 cubic meters to 187 c. m. per hectare of forest area (from 2173 to 2674 cu. ft.). In the last 30 years it has remained pretty much unchanged. 4. Main Stand Increment. The normal increment corresponding to the site quality is estimated for 1 ha. at 6.18 c.m.; the actual increment (corresponding to the stand qualities) at 4.84 c.m. (88 and 69 cu. ft. per acre). The annual felling budget of the last revision period amounted on an average to 4.21 c.m. (60 cu. ft.). 5. The Fellings on 1 Hectare of Forest Soil amount on the average to: 1854-63 1864-73 1874-83 1884-93 1804-03 1894-08 Timber 3.44 4.28 A72 4.88 5.03 5.34 c.m. per hectare. Total volume 5.01 5.85 6.48 6.43 6.39 623155 : ss 6. The Proportion of the Timber Size Classes. The timber per cent has in the course of the past century risen from 17% (in the decade 1817 to 1826) to 82% (1904- 1908). . : ; Appendix 185 7. The Income and Expenditure and the Net Yield in marks per ha. of the entire area amounts on the average to: 1817-26 1827-36 1837-46 1847-53 1854-63 1864-73 1874-83 1884-93 1894-03 1904-08 Income: 17.5 18.6 20.2 25.6 35.4 49.1 62.4 66.7 76 90.4 M Expenditure: 8.0 8.6 9.1 10.2 11.5 13.9 20.8 23.0 28.9 33.2 M Net yield: 9.5 10.0 Tle 15.4 23.9 Boe 41.6 43.7 47.1 57.2M 8. The Forest Capital was estimated (in marks per ha. of forest soil) to be: 1854-63 1864-73 1874-83 1884-03 1894-03 1894-08 1156 1417, 1682 1859 2206 2311 M (P. 243) To calculate the forest capital, soil and stand values must be ascertained. The soil value is estimated for the average area of the different reviers on the basis of expectation values. The value of the growing stock (for stands up to 40 years) is calculated by cost value formulae. The interest rate is based on the relation of the net yield to the forest capital. 4. Control and Revision. The felling budget (classed as final and preliminary cuts) is summed up as a total budget (the amount of timber to be cut and controlled is fixed). At the end of the 10-year management period, a main revision takes place; and in the middle of the period an interim revision. In the main revision an entire redrafting of the working plan takes place (on the basis of a new valuation of the revier). In the interim revision, necessary additions and corrections are considered; especially; (a) forestation, (b) comparison of the felling results with the estimate, (c) deviations of the fellings from the plan and (d) miscellaneous. Moreover the nature of the revision is dependent on the changes in the forest management which have taken place (as compared with the working plan), while the details of the revisions are determined by the instructions on the formulation of new plans. 5. Maps. For the management plan the Saxon stand maps are of the greatest importance; these show (on the scale of 1: 20,000 or 1: 15,000) the species, the age and the felling series. The felling areas of the next decade, the sequence of fellings, the severance fellings and the liberation cuttings are specially marked on the maps. IV. WURTEMBERG. The Instructions (printed in 1878) for the elaboration and renewal of working plans had the combined allotment method as a basis. In the year 1808 these Instructions were changed and supplemented by new regulations which abrogated the area allot- ment plan and limited the regulation of the yield to the allotment (p. 244) of the felling area for the first period. These regulations are in force for State and institution forests. The most important regulations concern the preparatory work, the formulation of the working plans and their execution and revision. I. Preparatory Work. The regulations regarding the formation of working groups and the subdivision for management are of the next greatest importance (ie., after the prescriptions for the determination of the felling areas, the surveying and mapping). 1. The Forming of Working Groups. Different methods of management and diverg- ence from the normal rotation are emphasized as reasons for their segregation. For each working group an independent age class relation (with special order of ite is to be attempted and a special felling series established. 2. Subdivision. (a) Districts. As a rule the different large forest areas of an administrative unit are segregated as districts. Their main purpose is to afford a simpler orientation. (b) Compartments are considered as the permanent local cornerstone of management. It is intended in the course of time to eradicate the differences occurring within the com- partments (and lots) which on account of their form and size do not seem convenient. The average size of the compartments in moderately large working groups, for broad leafed trees and conifers, must not exceed 35 to 50 acres. Their boundaries should be located as far as possible on natural contour lines and on roads to facilitate easier identification, to economize area, to protect the edges of stands and to enable the careful skidding of logs. “The main road system generally forms the basis of the subdivision.” (c) Lots are the unit for the felling and silvical measures of the working plans. The reasons for the segregation of lots (not to be too rigidly carried out) are: 186 American Forest Regulation " | | (P. 245) I. When the stand and soil on a part of the compartment is so different. from the rest that a similar management (especially simultaneous regeneration) cannot take place; : 2. When some species occurs other than that dominating the compartment; 3. When the dominant species shows a variation in age of over 20 years. The boundaries of the lots are generally not marked in the forest. The lots are shown on the map by small Latin letters, which also indicate the age classes (a = I-20, b = 21-40, c = 41-60 years, etc.). (d) Felling Area Division. In coppice and coppice under standards only the division into yearly or periodic fellings is necessary. II. The Working Plan. The general order reads: “The entire management is to be so regulated by the working plan that its purpose may be attained as quickly and as completely as possible—the most advantageous use of the forest,—at the same time securing a sustained yield, and with due consideration of the objects and needs of the owner.” 1. Form of Presentation. The most usual form of the working plan (from several in existence) is: District and jcomp. Sub-Compartment Stand Description. | Age-Classes Cultures Main Yields of I Period. re = == no | & | SS SSS = 7 5 5 Ne | | | | oe EY = wy | 0 | Area- Basis’) Y ield (timber wood) f=] 7 | “Jec BS | oe = =| —_—_ _ —— =) 9 B= a e381 074 (ae Species | s/o IO, to sf ee cee Ste lees Ta ales AERC tr rie leetnt and =| 8\e/8 So) 8g 3 #l5|3 3 =i | | x. Decade Decade S. 3 | < 9) <¢ |o%| Stand | S| J Le lis) £ gle O o Ss I, =| All The =H ae 3 Q \o> Form, |®}a|o| +) « 0) 3 3 n fi |fle|dic|b] 5 w& Cu & ep Cc o| = |= =p,2| Relation | 5 as se See 5 > | lH TH) elation ° | | a 8 | | Oost oO] of Fi = So) | ecies | = Mixture, |Lbeld wc bila LA! i | Area- plan flr ra fz, | efos =] hei | te Ss 3 av} m. | #4 m, ha. |ha| |Years Hectare Hectare Hectare O% Rens 2. Economic Data. The stand descriptions are brief and are limited to the essential points necessary for clearness. The recent yield tables of Lorey, Weise, Wimmenauer, and Eberhard form the basis for site classification (which relates to the dominant species—if in the first decade a change takes place by planting other species). Ttias given by lots, if differences within the compartments are to be emphasized, otherwise by compartments. The average age of the dominant stand (determined for the manage- ment) is used. Stands with sharply defined age classes (especially those in process of regeneration) are assigned to different age classes according to the proportional area occupied. 3. The Area Regulation Plan (p. 247). In contrast to the former rules for the allot- Appendix 187 ment method, at present only the area for the first 20-year period is actually allotted. The standard for the utilization area to be segregated, is the normal area of the 20-year period; but where there is a deficiency of mature stands, this is reduced, and if an excess above the normal amount, it is increased. The recording of the areas is by lots. If a lot is only partly assigned to regeneration in the first (1) period, only a correspond- ing part of its area is to be allotted to the (I) period (except for special cases); the remainder is left out of consideration (i.e. in group regeneration cuttings, seed fellings, etc.). In choosing the stands to be regenerated, the following must be weighed: a consideration of these stands themselves, a good felling series, and an arrangement of stands with a corresponding local distribution of age classes. A development of the stands (injurious to the technically correct cutting) must be prevented by sufficiently early liberation and improvement fellings. In large conifer areas, a gradual formation of short and, so far as possible, independent felling series must be particularly striven for. Accurate stand maps (colored if possible) are to be used for planning the work (on which measures are also to be noted). If, for the purpose of enlarging the basis of the area plan, it appears desirable to consider the second (II) period as well as the first (1), its area must be also segregated. 4. Plan for the Main Cut. Up to the year 1808 the regulation of the main cut was in accordance with the simplified combined allotment method (described in the literature of Grebe, Graner, and Stoetzer). At present the regulation of the yield is limited to the first (1) period. The total of the lot yields assigned to the (I) period forms the basis for the periodic budget. These yields are determined according to the condition of the stand, and after a consideration of the felling series and the age class relations. Accidental fellings are to be added to the cut (from the stands not included in the felling plan of the (1) period); ... . these are estimated according to average conditions without trying to consider (p. 248) the amount produced by unusual natural phenomena. The main felling budget of the next decade is, as a rule, to be put at half the yield of the first period. All yield data refer to timber. The volumes for the (1) period are usually secured by calipering 100% of the stand. 5. Area Plan of Thinnings. For carrying out the secondary fellings of the first decade either a mere area plan is provided, or else in addition an estimate of the timber yield (in cubic meters). All secondary fellings are to be treated as thinnings without reference to the age of the stand. 6. Other Matters in Working Plans. Besides the plans named there must be added to the working plan: an area plan for cleanings; an area plan for the forestation to be carried out in the first decade; and a plan for the use of litter. . 7. Statistics. Since the year 1882 annual reports are made, which give the results of the management of the past year. These also include periodically the results of the working plans. III. Execution and Revision of Working Plans. I. Control. “In carrying out the main fellings in the timber forest,” says the forest service manual, “as well as in standards (coppice under standards forest) a volume control is applied so far as a budget of volume has been set. For the secondary fellings (in the timber forest and in the coppice under standards) an area control is to be used so far as the working plan provided for thinnings.” The unit controlled includes the cubic of timberwood (Derbholz, 3 inch diameter and over). II. Renewal of Working Plans. (a) Main Revision, (p. 249). This takes place at the termination of a decade. Either an exhaustive revision of the working plan in its essential parts is made, or merely a correction of the existing plan (especially as regards the fellings and forestation) depending on the changes which have or are to take place during the decade, through natural occurrences or economic conditions. (b) Interim Revisions. In timber forests of more than 750 acres an interim revision is made at the end of five years; this considers mainly the felling budget and the influence of any natural injuries on the utilization. 188 American Forest Regulation V. BADEN. In Baden also the yield regulation has been first of all by the allotment method (volume allotment). This method, however, did not appear suitable under the preva-_ lent forest conditions which are characterized by natural regeneration (especially silver fir). Since the regeneration of the fir (including the preparatory cuttings) required much longer than the 20-year periods, the management could not be adapted (as is the basic condition of a good method) to the framework of the yield regulation. For about 60 years decennial revisions have been made in Baden working plans, The results (the budgets actually realized and their effect on the condition of the forest) form an important basis for practical management. The present method was introduced in the year 1869. Essential changes in the present rules are expected in the near future as evidenced by the literature. The most important points of the Baden method are: 1. Preparatory Work (p. 250). Before drawing up a working plan there is an inspec- tion of the forest by the officials charged with the work and the last plan is care- fully investigated in all its details. This investigation includes the subdivisions of the forest, the former site and stand descriptions, the estimate of the growing stock and increment, the results of the previous working plan and the principles underlying the future management. The general descriptions refer to the data on the site conditions, the existing species, method of management, rotation, management rules, etc. For each compartment or lot there is a brief description of the area, the stand, the growing stock and the increment. The growing stock in the compartments under regeneration is calipered; elsewhere as a rule it is estimated by yield tables, past experience and by sample plots. For a long time special weight has been laid on the estimate of the current increment for regulation purposes because of the present stand conditions (there was otherwise no sufficient basis). The importance of increment for the regulation of yield is emphasized in the most recent instructions. In the report, yield tables and sample plot data are used; but in the elaboration of the working plan special local investigations are also made (in suitable stands). Besides the current increment (which is the objective of such investigations) the mean increment at the felling age (accepted rotation) is also established. 2. Determination of the Felling Budget. The determination of the felling budget is derived by Karl Heyer’s method (ie. felling budget total increment in period of regulation plus difference of actual and normal stock divided by period of regulation). The actual increment is thus the main basis and measure of the felling budget. This increment was conceived and determined according to the Instructions of 1869 as current increment, “as it will probably take place in the next decade.” In consideration of the difficulty of an accurate calculation and the limitation of the use of the results of the calculation on the main felling budget, it appeared advisable to let the mean increment at fellifig age take the place of the current increment (p. 251). The growing stock is estimated for all age classes according to the actual volume of the stand. In each age class the normal stock corresponding to it (to be ascertained by the use of yield tables) is employed for comparison with the actual growing stock. The total normal growing stock is besides to be determined according to the formula, increment on total area for half the rotation. ‘More than the increment is to be used if an excess above the normal stock exists, the utilization of which appears silvically and economically advisable. Less than the increment is to be used when the full normal stock is not yet in existence. In the latter case the quicker the normal stock can be attained (by saving of increment) the better, provided that in doing so no essential economic loss or mistake in management is caused; in no case, however, shall the equalization period be longer than the rotation. With these principles in mind, the felling budget is determined for each given case according to forest conditions and the special needs of the owner; but it must not be forgotten how undesirable it would Appendix | 189 be, for communities and corporations, to have any considerable variation in the felling budget in the various decades, and how greatly this variation would detract from the standing of forestry. A steady gradual rise in the felling *Sudget will be considered much more desirable by every forest owner, rather than a rapid rise, which must be followed by a considerable fall later on; the reverse is also true. Moreover, it is to be expected that in almost every decade, extraordinary happenings and needs make extraordinary utilization necessary, and that therefore very often the established budget must be exceeded. In case of doubt therefore, it is good policy to be conservative. To the main budget (figured as above) the secondary fellings are to be added according to estimate. Overcuts and undercuts, which (according to the rules of management are to be compensated for in the new decade) must, in so far as they affect the main cut, be considered when the new budget is decided upon. The budget for the coppice and coppice under standards forests, which are regulated by area, is the actual yield of the annual felling area (and is thus determined by area and not by volume). 3. Statistics (p. 252) are closely connected with forest organization. A uniform method of statement was established in Baden in 1869 to simplify the general descrip- tions in working plans, and to obtain good data on forest history and yields. The administration officials begin the statistics, which are continued and completed by the estimators when the working plans are revised. The importance of good connected statistics for forest organization is clearly recognized in Baden. ‘The most important statistical data are: 1. The Rotation. In the State forests 50.4% of the area is under 120 years rotations, 26% 100 years, 9.4% 90 years, and 3.4% 8o years. 2. The Increment. The actual volume increment at felling (rotation) age is placed at 4.9 cubic meters; the normal is 5.4 in the State forests. 3. The Growing Stock. This is shown since 1862, when it amounted to 220 cu. m. for the timber forests, a steady increase eg to the present figure of 290 cu. m.; the normal growing stock is estimated at 299 cu. 4. The Felling Budget. This amounts (leases to present conditions) in main fellings to 4.5 cu. m., in secondary fellings to 1.6 cu. m. The cut has increased from 4.67 cu. m. in the year 1867 to 6.31 cu. m. in the year 1907. 5. Average Prices (for log classes according to the Heilbronner standard). The average price per cu. m. has risen from 8.63 marks in the year 1867 to 13.71 M in the year 1907, 6. Income, Expenditures and Net Yield. The income per hectare has risen (1867 to 1907) from 44.03 M to 89.86M; the expenditures from 36.9M to 41.8M, the net yield from 26.77 M to 52.31 M (with normal exchange, about $3.70 to $4.20 per acre). Vai GRAND DUCHY OP HESSE: The directions and aims which are followed in formulating working plans are charac- terized by the words: “The management (p. 253) of the State and communal forests is to be directed, with adequate consideration of the needs of the present, so as to increase the yield (qualitatively and quantitatively) as quickly as possible to the highest possible amount. In order to attain this object, the aim must be to bring the actual increment as nearly as possible to the normal.” The most important measures for the attainment of the normal yield condition are: early utilization of poor stands, choice of species adapted to the site, technically correct forestation, thorough care of the stand, and rational thinning practice. The most important prescriptions in the Instructions refer to: 1. The Construction of the Stand Table. The document most characteristic of the working plan bears the title “Stand Table and Management Book (Wirthschaftbuch)” and is drawn up according to the following scheme: 190 American Forest Regulation District and Compaftment. Wooded Area—ha. ) F wie Growing Stock in Site and Stand 3 os Timber-and Brush- Group. Desc., Soil, Situa- Aim of Ole 4 S wood According tion, Exposure, Management, ees The to Yield Table. bases Species in aM ae mon Decimals of Stand.| *” SS aaseaibe LS oe For For the Group Area Justification of for next 3 & OD I or Compart- lit. |——-_—_— Management Decade, = © i ha ment. Ha, ied Hitherto. AY is Ss aie a. rv0 a cu. m. Tes YE Be 4. 5. 6 7: 8. ) : Current. Estimate of Yield in Timber-and Actual Grow: 5 Brushwood Expected in next Decade. re eStock capers Normal | Actual! TS 3 a ee Increment} Incr. Main Yield % in Timber- eae ain Yield. fy and Brush- Z | : a 2 9 Tore a) Over| b) Other Intermediary 5 wood for Se {Ory cau an od Mature Fellings. 8 Group Salts Timber-and Volume Tecan 3 | or Compart- o 5 Brushwood on i a ment, s ye aes In the Group Per In the Group 7 Per Year and ha. | 9; Compartment. | ha. | or Compartment. cu. m. cu. m. Gu...iim: Q. 10. LL. Tie | 13. 14. | 15. 16, 7. ——= — | | | | | | | | The following explanations are also given (p. 255): Parts, within the permanent com- partments (Abteilungen) are segregated as lots or groups (Gruppe), which differ from each other so essentially in site, species, age, growth, etc. that they must be under special treatment. The groups are designated on the maps by small Latin letters and are locally bounded by shallow ditches . The organizer decides whether the parts (as small as .7 acre) of the compartment are adapted by situation, size and shape to special management . If groups are based on site, they assume a permanent character; but if based on the condition of the stand they are temporary. These differences are in the course of time. to be diminished or eradicated. The site and stand descriptions follow the rules of the Forest Experiment Stations. Measures for the essential establishment and development of the stands are given in the stand descriptions. Appendix 19f The objects of management (as the stand appears at the time of survey) are entered in the plans; as a rule the local officer in charge cooperates directly in drawing up the working plan. The “objects of management” are not, however, binding for all time; it is only to assist newly appointed officials and changes may. be ordered at the time the annual working plan is drawn up, or be agreed upon at inspections. The urgently neces- sary measures of the next 10 years are to be briefly stated by the administrative officer. In mixed stands the main species determines the management. Height forms the most important basis and measure of site classification. In every lot or group the average height of the stand is determined by measuring several stems of about medium height; on the basis of this height and age, the site classes are established according to the standard of current yield tables. The normal growing stock is also taken from the yield tables; the actual growing stock is found by multiplying the normal stock by a reduction factor, which like the full yield factor in Prussia is expressed by a deci- mal (p. 256). The current (normal and actual) increment, which appears in the stand table, refers to that part of the total increment, which goes into the permanent stand. The normal increment is found by subtracting the growing stock volume of the main stand (as found in the yield tables) at age (a) from that at (a—410) and then dividing the difference by 10. The actual increment is found by multiplying the normal incre- ment by the full yield factor. 2. The Calculation of Growing Stock and Increment. In order to give the total normal increment and normal growing stock, a statement of the site classification for the future main species is required. The normal increment, arranged according to species and site, is calculated as mean increment at felling age. On the basis of the conclusions of such a statement the normal increment and the normal growing stock may be figured from current yield tables. The calculation of the normal growing stock is made under the assumption of regularly graded age classes (I. 1-20, II. 21-40, etc.) the normal area of which is determined by their relation to the total rotation. The estimates of yield are made to the middle of the age classes. By adding the estimates of the different site classes, normal increment and normal growing stock for the dif- ferent species is obtained. The total normal increment and normal growing stock is then found by adding the figures for the different site classes. The age class table serves as a basis for the statement of the actual growing stock; the area and the actual growing stock in timberwood and brushwood is given for every age class. At the end of this tabulation, the areas and growing stock of each age class are compared with the normal age classes and,the normal growing stock. The budget is based on the result . : 3. The Protocol of the Council. After the preparation of the data cited above, a protocol of the council is taken down which is to be submitted to the ministerial divi- sion for approval. This must cover: the species to be planted or to be favored in the future, the rotation, the possibility of a uniform period of organization, the sequence of thinnings, the present silvicultural method of management, any contemplated changes, the normal felling area and the formulation of management rules. 4. The Formulation of the Budget and the Method of Utilization. (Logging Prac- tice). 1. Felling Budget (p. 257). A. Utilization in Mature Timber. The normal felling area forms the basis for utilization, covered by the working plan. If the stand conditions are,regular, it is sufficient to draw up the felling plan for a decade. Irreg- ular conditions may indicate the desirability of planning the expected fellings for two or more decades. Deviations from the normal fellings are to be mainly justified as follows: (a) The Relation Between the Actual and Normal Growing Stock. Present differences are to be diminished unless a change of rotation is contemplated. To determine the propriety of felling a growing stock surplus or of making up an existing deficit all silvicultural and financial conditions must be exhaustively considered. (b) The Age Class Relation: The growing stock of the 2 or 3 oldest classes is to be especially considered; if the actual growing stock does not differ essentially from the 192 American Forest Regulation normal and if an appropriate part of the stock is found in the 3 oldest classes, the sustained yield may be considered as assured. (c) The Relation of Fellings to Increment. A comparison of the felling budget with the actual increment gives an indication whether, in the next decade, a diminution or increase of the growing stock may be expected. 2. Determination of the Felling Areas and Progress of Regeneration. Areas of slow growth, where the increment differs most widely from the normal, should be felled first. Stands are chosen for the felling budget upon the following basis: I. Stands in need of felling: (a) Stands and parts of stands with poor increment, (b) remnants of high forest, improvement fellings, and clearing for roads, (c) parts of stands which must be sacrificed to establish a felling series; IJ. Mature Stands (p. 258); III. Questionable Stands. Great stress is laid on a regular felling series and a good dis- tribution of fellings. Large areas of even-aged stands are to be limited as much as possible because of the dangers from storms, insects, etc. and to facilitate the local distribution of wood supplies. The Instructions prescribed, therefore, the formation of short felling series with cross-roads, railroads, rides, roads, watercourses, valleys, mountain crests, etc. as boundaries. 3. Determination of the Wood Volume. The following rule is of interest: “The stands selected for the main felling budget for the next 10 years generally need not be calipered; the volumes of the felling budget can be based on yield tables or on estimates. Errors in estimating (due to this mere approximation of the main felling budget) if they are established at the time of felling, may be corrected by changing the felling budget within the 10-year management period or at the close of the period. II. Secondary Fellings. The thinnings (whose yields are entered in the table above mentioned) are listed in an area and volume budget corresponding to the main yield. The area budget is so made that about 1/10 of the total area to be thinned is felled annually, so that the felling is extended equally over younger and older stands, and if need be over stands of different species. The yield estimate is based on the yield tables, after carefully considering the actual conditions of the stand in question. Con- sidering the difficulty of establishing and executing adequate thinning budgets, a rule has been made, that, at the close of the annuai working plan, a compilation of the periodically thinned areas must be prepared. If it is found that according to this area statement, the secondary fellings are not progressing fast enough, the secondary felling budget must be increased accordingly. 5. Mapwork (p. 259). The stand maps made to accompany the working plan on the scale of 1: 10,000 show the age classes by color, the species by tree figures, the sites by broken lines. 6. Control. An efficient control covers the total felling, main and intermediary, timberwood and non-timberwood. , VII. GRAND. DUCHY OF SAMONY: The Preparation of Working Plans (including surveys and check of management rules) is assigned to a special bureau (“Taxation Commission”) whose president directs all work. Assurance of a present and future sustained yield is considered of first impor- tance in forest organization, provided forest production maintains and increases the fertility of the soil, and the highest yields are produced in the shortest possible time. The subdivision into permanent management units (compartments) has been carried out in a systematic way; in the plains by a net work of regular lines and in the moun- tains via contours connected with the road system. The average size of compartments is about 62 acres, and lots, if adequate stand differences exist (which form the basis of the management), are segregated to a minimum size. Stand volumes for the first decade are secured by special stock taking, which gives for each stand: number of stems, diameter, height, form factor, increment in diameter, basal area, volume and increment per cents. The results of the volume calculations are filed with the Commission. The forest experiments on yield are connected up with forest regulation; in fact the president of the “Taxation Commission” directs the estab- Appendix | 193 lishment of sample plots where the influence of the various methods of stand regeneration and treatment are studied . es In each lot, description, area, site, age, height, and character of the stands are to be noted and (p. 260) entered in a survey register, which contains also the preliminary rules for management. At the same time the age class ee is drawn up and placed opposite the periodic felling area plan. The method of yield regulation is the combined allotment, which was upheld in literature by Grebe, for many years the director of the Grand Ducal forest organization. At present it is only used in its simplest form, in such a way that the yields are only shown for the first two periods. The main working plan is therefore to be formulated according to the following form: Results of Management. There Was Felled: Forestation: 1 a Designation, Plant “= oO ; ry OE Area. Volume. of Retine age Sees Area. Costs. Sipeec ae ethod | upply. Uses. Os and Number| Character | ane of of at sTeee = ha. cu.m.| z5 Record, | Forestation. ha. m. pf. |— —— 18. +! 19. | 20. 21. 22. 23- 24. 25. j- a = * = = salir ti The areas and volumes of the first (20-year) period are shown separately for the first and second decades. The timber yields in cubic meters are derived by adding the increment (up to the middle of the utilization period) to the present volume. The annual main felling budget is found by dividing the budget of the first decade by Io. Thinnings are regulated by area, but volumes are checked by local yield table estimates and special investigations. The control of fellings and forestation is according to the following scheme: Property. Actual Growing Stock. Regulated Management. | Wolamic I 20 Year Period. and from to lcs | Increment. yeaa. 2. Decade 3 from to from to Designation, § ze | isdandis ializ ica Wood Yield. | Wood Yield. = — | -Character. nA per | S Ed | fa | nae | ° SE er = 2 | } Bo) Sa] PY lrotal| 2 | POrslie Ratal . | * ha. | cu. m. Navas | Gud) an: ha. | cul; mi. l " ow i: immey tosh i rial | j | | 194 American Forest Regulation II 20 Year Period. , 3 esleglselau|é 2 from to oo 06 oOo ao) ns OO me eta | ie, | ee al Oe go ° | o n vo be Wood Yield. yeu oF | on, oa, Se = Riles of = 6 = oy «¢ es Management. m < per ha. Total. = AD | > % Z ha. Cue mn: ha. ha ha. ha ha The volumes of actual thinnings are compared with the budget. Revisions occur as a rule every 10 years (p. 261). The policy concerning silvicultural methods, rotations, as well as all conditions influencing the treatment of the forest must be clearly stated. The revised tables must show first of all the results of management during the past decade; next the plans for the coming decade. Otherwise the (working plan) revisions (which are similar in detail to those adopted by other states) depend on the changes which have taken place in the condition of the forest during the last decade. ; Wood Yield. Cultures. Areas. al an é vi haa res Fuel wood. b éy|% Special Data ; oo te © parse bek ob | Go| o w ejz| £ | 3 = s ac eee $ z as to oO (=; - : 1 5 = _ 1 1% < od eS zv = Sy ° f Fellin Sf § Sees 5 Ts =a =| Miee 5 Method of Felling O 2 & ° Fae) Re} ee & and Cultures. sere ha cu. m cu m. |rm.| ha M == == = | | | | VIII. ALSACE-LORRAINE.* When formulating new working plans (for forests for which there are no plans, or if there are plans, after the expiration (p. 262) of the 20-year period, after essential changes in area, after considerable overcuts due to windfall, insect injuries, etc., or when changes to other silvicultural methods are contemplated) a preliminary project (which must include the map for subdivisions and road+system as well as regulations regarding the methods of management and rotations) is drawn up by the revier super- visor; this is examined by the Forest Inspector and finally accepted by the Minister. The most important regulations for the formulation of working-plans are: 1. Subdivision. The formation of permanent management units (compartments) is *See also the discussion in “Studies in French Forestry” already cited. German Forest Management in Alsace-Lorraine, now restored to France, is of special value to the student of regulation, especially when compared with French technique. Appendix 195 connected up with the road system. The area of the compartments must not as a rule exceed 25 to 37 acres in conifer stands, or 37-50 acres in broadleafed stands. Coppice and coppice under standards are subdivided into yearly felling areas as the local basis of management. In communal forests (as was prescribed in the ordinances of Colbert) one fourth the area is first to be set aside as a reserve. No binding rules are given for the formation of lots. In large forests (if several species are concerned) the smallest lot is 2.5 acres, provided a good boundary is possible, ..... . . otherwise 5 acres a: where stands are being regenerated .... 2% acres... . or if old Eimiber 1§ Clear cut... .. The lot corners must be marked locally by stakes and non- continuous ditches and entered on the maps. The compartments are labeled as in Prussia with Arabic numbers, fellings in coppice under standards and selection forests with Roman numbers, lots with small Latin Letters, while non-forest soil is indicated with German letters. With new subdivisions (p. 263) the numbering of the compart- ments and lettering of the lots is from the northeast towards the southwest, so that compartments and lots always bear higher numbers or later letters towards the wind direction. 2. Surveying and Mapping. Survey work is as a rule limited to changes in interior subdivisions, since usable maps exist for the whole country. After the survey of the compartment and lot lines, highways, roads, and water courses, etc., the special map (or office map) is to be brought up to date by the working plans officer. With the corrected special map as a base, a control (Uebersicht) map, which differentiates the species by color, is to be made on the scale of 1:25,000. The dates of utilization are only given for the areas assigned to the (I) and (I1) period. The symbols used are: (1) first period areas, (I]) second period, (I. II.) areas to be regenerated within 4o years, (Pr.) selection stands, (S.) scenic forests; areas designated for oak reproduction (at least % acre in area) are outlined in red on the management map and must be marked in the forest. 3. The General Description of the Revier digests the characteristic features of management regarding the general condition of the revier (as regards ownership), boundaries, survey, etc., site conditions (climate, configuration, soil); the occurrence and preservation of the main species; the previous management and its results; future management, especially the species, methods of silviculture, rotation; formulation of management regulations for fellings, for regeneration and development of the stands, the location of the road system and subdivisions; the wood market, secondary uses, hunting, etc. 4. Special Description of Site and Stand. Site classes are given as a rule (if the lots do not show decided differences), for the whole compartment. They are based on the yield capacity (as compared with existing yield tables). Descriptions of situa- tion, soil, and stands are as agreed upon by the Union (p. 264) of Forest Experiment Stations. The mineral content of the soil, its freshness, depth and humus content is gauged by sample borings; stand descriptions are brief to the exclusion of all unessen- tial or self-evident statements. 5. Segregation of Age Classes. Age classes are formed for each species; when different ages occur the areas are separated, especially stands under regeneration where the wood volume is divided into old timber and young growth. 6. Measure of Utilization and Periodic Area Division. The normal periodic area serves as a measure for the periodic cut in the present management period. If all the stands are to be managed under the same rotation, the normal felling area for a period is obtained by multiplying the area by 20r. (where r=rotation). If several rotations are used, the normal periodic felling area is similarly determined for each species sepa- rately; the total felling area is then found by adding up the areas for each species. The stand volumes for the first period (in which regeneration cuttings have begun) are reduced in accordance with the age classes. A further allotment of stands for the III, IV, V, and VI periods is not made; these are simply listed in the column “Later Periods.” In selecting the stands for the periods, their age and vigor must be taken 196 American Forest Regulation into consideration. In conifer stands the formation of short felling series is recom- mended. The rigid allotment method is no longer in use in Alsace-Lorraine. 7. Scaling and Listing of Wood Volumes. Because of large contiguous stands of old timber and the long regeneration period (p. 265) the periodic area usually includes two periods. The volumes of all uncut regeneration fellings (ieee hiebsreste) of the (1) period as well as the mature and nearly mature stands of the (II) period are usually calipered. In regular stands of the (II) period the growing stock is approximated by sample plots... . .. The volume of the second period is subtracted from the totals of the two periods . . . . increment (calculated to the middle of period) added to determine felling budget . OF 8. Felling Budget. This is obtained by dividing the totals ‘oe the volume measure- ments by 20. The felling budget, calculated in cubic meters of timberwood, is listed separately for the main and secondary fellings, by the four species groups: oak, beech, other broadleaved trees, conifers. In the communal forests a quarter of the area is held in reserve from the calculated main felling. g. Regulation of the Yield in Coppice and Coppice Under Standards. The yearly cut in these forests is arranged in regular sequence in flooded districts in the direction of the water flow. In coppice under standards the standards are calipered (and calculated) by age classes . : 10. Regulation of Yield in Beiecuon Forests. The felling budget is calculated from the actual increment and according to the relation of the actual to the normal growing stock (by the K. Heyer formula, felling budget = actual increment -++ or — difference of actual and normal stock divided by “equalization” period). To get the actual grow- ing stock all stems 3 inches and over are calipered. The actual increment is (p. 266) determined (p. 266) by special investigation on stems of different diameter classes; the normal growing stock is figured by the formula rotation X mean increment (at felling age) divided by 2 (or mean increment at felling age multiplied by half the rotation). The length of the “equalization” period is determined in each case. The cutting cycle is usually short, i.e. 7-9 years. 11. Forestation and Road Building Plans are always included in the working plan. The Forestation plan includes; formation of stands, nursery work, seed collection, care of felling areas and trees, . . . . emphasis is laid on the care of the soil. . . . irriga- tion and drainage . . . . protection ditches and leaf catches. For the planning, build- ing and maintenance of logging roads detailed and careful directions are given. 12. Working Plan Revisions take place in the middle of the 20-year period. The kind and extent of the work to be undertaken is dependent on the demands which are made on the working plans, and the changes which have occurred through management or through outside influences, in the first half of the management period. The data include; changes in area, annual felling volume and its comparison with the working plan, compilation of the final cuttings and comparison with the estimated yield, extra- ordinary fellings, secondary yields, execution and cost of forestation, changes in servi- tudes, influence of secondary logging, the road building, etc. TX.) AUSTRIA. The most important technical instructions for the organization of the Austrian State forests concern: 1. Subdivision of the Reviers (p. 267) begins, where necessary, with the segregation of the protection and “ban” forests. Special protection belts are set aside where the forest reaches timber line . . . . The commercial forests have: management classes, felling series, compartments, and lots. (a) Management Classes. Different working groups ... . are formed for large contiguous forests because of differences in: transportation or market, method of treatment (high forest, coppice, etc.), method of cutting (clear cutting, natural regener- ation, selection forest, etc.), rotation, or existing limitations of management. (b) Felling Series. The working groups are divided (where sequence of fellings is Appendix 197 of consequence), into felling series, which are defined as “a contiguous series of felling areas.” Their formation is dependent on the contours, the species and the kind of regeneration. The size of the felling series is determined by the size of the manage- ment unit, species, method of management, logging and transport conditions, but should not as a rule comprise more than three compartments. The boundaries of the felling series are formed along contours, or by roads, fire lines, or management strips opened up along the division lines to a breadth of 15-25 feet to develop windfirm border trees Younger stands... . . . exposed to the wind are protected by severance bellines j : (c) Gate eaenents, The boundaries of the management classes and felling series form the framework of the compartments . . . . adapted. . . . partly to the moun- tain ridges and valley depressions, and to the existing roads, railroads, etc. Where these (p. 268) do not suffice for subdivision boundaries, artificial rides are made . The length of compartments (which corresponds with the breadth of the felling series) is 2400 to 3000 feet—the breadth about 1800 feet . (d) Lots. The reasons for forming lots are differences in: management and treat- ment, species in pure stands, mixture . . . .; mean stand age (10 years in young pole high forests, 20 years in old timber), in site class or yield capacity when these clearly show themselves in the uneven development of the same species, especially height growth, on contiguous parts of an area, in stocking, need of reforestation . In the forest, the lot boundary lines are shown by small signs, shallow blazes, painted rings, timber scribe marks on trees and poles in old stands, and by narrow lanes in young growth. 2. Survey and Description of Forest Conditions. (a) Preparation of Yield Tables. It is generally prescribed in the organization of State forest reviers that yield tables shall be made for the different methods of treatment, species and site classes. These are based on carefully selected and combined sample plots (p. 260) . . . . . The data secured are as follows: : Secondary Main Stand. Stand. Hi): o BS © oo es) Wood Volume. Increment. fl ea.| 28 a os eee og thr S | 226 Sas Sh erat= Wood 0 - = ee <= Sia as) P a| 5a Tie he o o8 6 OE ' feller o i) and SE z as 0S too oO a DO | 20 Brush- les FOr £m 6 +2 0 33 S3/ wf d | Sa o Saal £° ons oflaso |Z yee | = At Breast z mest tess 2 om rae > Height. | = a | < | —— / 2 m | cm. m. Glue Pi, | cu. m. | | (b) Stand Descriptions contain: (1) Statements on the condition of the soil (subsoil, root space, humus contents, cover) and situation (slope, exposure, etc.). (2) Species, mixture, ... . . . The space each species occupies is expressed in decimals. (3) Age. Mean, minimum, and maximum age is given. The compilation of age classes is given in the age class tables separately for each 198 American Forest Regulation working group ... . The areas under regeneration are entered in the column “Regeneration Class.” The areas are also distributed as accurately as possible in the columns: “(old timber,” young growth,” and “openings or clearings)” (p. 270) .. . 4. Index of Yield. The productivity is shown by: (a) The stand mean; (b) The total basal area; (c) The site class. To this must always be added the species to which it relates. In mixed stands only the main species is considered; (d) Per cent stocked . 5. The Gravink Stock; (a) Main Stand Secondary Stand (Zwischenbestand, Mehedueshna. Thissancludes. . . .1/eabateige pressed trees and those that suppress the main stand (therefore to be removed if not resulting in undue openings). Secondary stand volumes that probably can not be utilized in the coming decade, are not given in the estimates. 6. Mean Increment at Probable Felling Age ... . uncertain plantations are omitted . 7. The Volume Increment Per Cent, calculated according to the formula i= (=) M+m in young and medium aged forests are as a rule from yield tables; in nearly mature and mature stands, on the contrary, an accurate calculation of the growing stock is always made. Unevenly stocked areas... . . . less than 5 acres in area, are com- pletely calipered. In regular stands sample plots (5-10% of the stand area) are selected in suitable locations (p. 271). The volume calculation is based on mean trees . All volume and increment figures are compiled and appended to the working plan. M : : ( =|. M and m=volumes n years apart. The volume and increment calculations 200\ /20— 8. Quality Increment Per Cent, calculated according to the formula b =()( 7) n 20+q in which Q—q=average net difference of value, Q-++q=the sum of values of the average cubic meter. . . ., n =the number of years which the stem requires to grow from one class to another. 9. The Index Per Cent (after Pressler) calculated according to the formula: WS ane (a—b), where a=volume per cent, b=value per cent, H =the average value of the stand, G= base capital (soil, administration and forestation capital . . .). 10. Notes on the Management of the Stand (time and method of utilization, cleaning, thinning, pruning, reforestation, drainage, etc.). General Description. This records the current natural, legal, political, technical, commercial, financial and organization conditions, and includes especially: the area of the administrative unit (separated into forest and non-forest soil), how the non-forest soil will be used, . . . . property and legal conditions, boundaries, agricultural uses, water conditions, topography and soil, situation, climate, atmospheric influences, stand conditions, their history and management up to date, timber volume and money yield, secondary uses, hunting and fishing, timber prices in the forest and at the market, statements regarding personnel, etc. 3. Determination of the Felling Budget. This is given for a decade. The product is classified as main fellings, intermediary fellings and accident fellings. All yields. (p. 272) from the felling areas (selected for the next management period) belong to the main cut, as well as those accidental fellings that necessitate reforestation on at least .8 acre. Timber from windfall, snowbreak, frost or insect damage, and stolen timber recovered are entered separately as accidental fellings. The yield from weedings, thinnings and other improvement fellings . . . . are classed as secondary fellings. (a) Main Felling. The normal felling area forms the basis for the allotment to the next management period. . . . The determination of the rotation. . . . 1s based on the following policy: If there are no forceful reasons (due to transportation conditions or market) for the retention of the present rotation (especially if very high), the new Appendix 199 rotation should aim at securing an adequate interest rate on the capital investment. Those stands are considered mature where the index per cent has sunk below the current rate of interest (provided fellings are possible, with due regard to the rigid demands of the felling series). Unquestionably the following stands must be alloted (for utilization) to the next period: necessary severance fellings, safety strips, irregular stands with low increment (whose speedy regeneration is desirable because of low increment and poor soil con- ditions), and finally those stands which must be sacrificed to obtain a proper felling series. In irregular stands the felling areas are to be corrected . ... The Instruc- tions prescribe: “In determining the main yield in the annual management plan for each working group, on the basis of the age class table, it must be stated whether mature stands or stands capable of being cut and younger age classes (to be cut later) are sufficient, whether the cutting of mature growing stock is to be curtailed (and if so for how long), or whether, on the basis of general management rules a more rapid utilization of any existing volume surplus is desirable or justified (p. 273). “The time in which the creation of the normal age classes is to be attempted, is to be based on expert advice. The budget justifies the determination of the normal felling area by a summary of past fellings and the influence which these fellings have had on the development of the age classes. The age class conditions are therefore shown for a considerable period.” ‘These comparisons and considerations,” say the Instructions at the close of this section, “will lead to a final determination of the felling area; and the calculated volume (increased by the current mean increment up to the middle of the period of management), forms the volume budget for the decade. The strictly sustained yield is not necessary for each working group, except in those forests which are heavily burdened with servitudes. (b) Secondary and Accidental Fellings. Secondary fellings are classified as cleanings, weedings, thinnings, and fellings of seed trees* in young stands. The secondary fellings budget is found by summing up the proper merchantable volumes (estimated for each lot in the stand descriptions . . ..). The estimate for accidental fellings for each working group is summarized according to the records of past years, or according to experience. (c) Estimate of Yield in Selection Forests. Since the selection forest aims primarily at the protection of the soil, and since a regular sale of the cut is frequently unfeasible, the determination of a sustained yield budget (according to the definite established method) is usually given up and the felling budget is estimated by judgment. 4. Control and Revision. To show the changes which have taken place in the course of the management period, a number of records are kept by the administration; these control the estimates of the working plan and its execution, and serve as a basis for future revisions. Of special importance is: (a) The Journal (p. 274) which is similar to the general part of the Prussian ledger (Hauptmerkbuch). In it, are recorded: all changes . .. . occasioned by fellings . contrary. . . . to plans, changes in area or boundaries, in transportation and communication, important injuries by man, natural phenomena, fires, etc.; also state- ments about hunting and fishing, labor conditions, statistics regarding volume and financial results, works for the control of torrents, forest experiments, personnel, etc. (b) The Management Book (like the Prussian Control Book and the special part of the ledger) is divided into two parts. The first gives for every single lot (Kontroll- figur) the cut of material in round numbers (divided into timber and fuel wood, hard and soft wood, main, secondary and accidental fellings) together with the respective felling areas; also the reforestation carried out (divided into sowing and planting) as well as drainage data and the care of the felling areas and stands. The second part * So called “overholders” are not misshapen trees stealing light and food from the main crop but instead are trees held over from the former crop to furnish seed. 200 American Forest Regulation contains the annual compilation of fellings from the whole administrative district and the check of fellings (actually cut) together with their estimates. (c) Statistics concerning: changes in ownership, cut of stands (compared with the estimate), fellings (compared with the volume and area given in the felling budget) not prescribed in the plan, forestation and cost, income and expenditures, material and money results, etc. There are 2 kinds of revisions: (1) intermediate revisions, which become necessary in the course of the management period, due to unforeseen conditions (windfall, injuries by insects, etc., and (2) regular periodic revisions, which are undertaken the last year of the decade (for which the working plan was drawn up). The most important problems of the periodic revision are: In the first place an investigation as to whether the working plans have been closely adhered to in all parts, whether and to what extent the deviations have been justified, and how far the regulations of the old working plan have been proven correct in detail and as a whole. Secondly, the correction of the existing geodetic and mensuration data (or such new data as may be required for the next decade’s working plan). Thirdly, the preparation of the working plan for the next decade (p. 275). The intensiveness of the revisions depends on local conditions, but as a general rule the work must be done according to the “Instructions for New Forest Organization.” X. FRANCE. See “Studies in French Forestry,” by Theodore S. Woolsey, Jr., John Wiley & Sons, 1921, pages 206-261, 469-495, and 500-534, for a discussion of regulation in France. APPENDIX A. (b) FINANCIAL ROTATIONS: (FROM: ENDRES): A. Concept and Reckoning. By financial rotation we understand that period which, according to the soil rent theory, will produce the greatest land rental. It therefore falls at the time when the proceeds from the land are greatest. a. The financial rotation of single stands. If the stands are normal one reckons the soil rent for the several age classes (considering together those having similar earnings and cost) and the financial rotation is fixed at that age which indicates the greatest land returns. If it is a case of fixing the rotation for a stand not yet planted then one has to have interest tables to guide him in the work of fixing the rotation period. It is obvious that the rotation period found in this manner is valid only so long as those data, which has been used to figure out the rotation, remains unchanged. Each permanent change of these conditions also causes a change of financial rotation. Since there is no cost of administration and management the cost is very small and owing to the fact that it would have a long drawn out effect upon the final interest, it suffices to state, for the final rotation, the following formula: Ay plus’ Da Tyorpt—=2" plas . ei — I, Opr—1 Where B = Capital land value. ‘AS = Yield. D = Value from thinnings. u = Years in rotation. a =Time of thinnings. Or, when the thinnings that have been computed ahead are expressed as a per cent of the yield, we have O18 CSS WW ONE 6 C0, 6a 6) OLE MO 6, W).010/% SLE ele Oe 016, 8b wlale ee 6766 Glee aye) We axe © were) Ore The financial rotation or better still the rotation in abnormal stands is arrived at. (a) Through figuring the largest future return. (b) ‘Fhrough figuring the growth per cent. Appendix 201 In both cases we consider the maximum normal use of the forest soil for continual use. If we contemplate putting the soil to other uses such as farms or sale then we must figure in the higher value. This formula could also be used to figure future value of normal stands. The largest future stand value of normal stands is figured on that rotation in which the soil rent culmination and the per cent earned will at the same time be equal to the rate of interest. Owing to its simplicity the growth per cent is used in preference to the method of largest future returns. b. The financial rotation of the working circle. In order to approximate the area on which money returns will be forthcoming yearly, and to make sure of the area to be thinned the forest working plan must set forth some definite time limit as a working basis, that will suffice for the timely or orderly use. This time limit will serve a general rotation period of the working circle. Because the largest forest is never made up of equal working stands it is impossible to figure rotation by a mathematical formula. It is more likely to be the average financial rotation of all single stands, from which again the older marketable wood must be given primary consideration. We cannot measure the influence which the general rotation will have on the single stands. We cannot characterize it as Kraft has done. The length of the general rotation is influenced by the financial working of the single stands. The financial producing power of the stand depends on the manner of handling. : It does not all depend on whether the stand has a general rotation that is too long or too short; whether the stand is too old or too young; whether or not the age of the stand surpasses the general rotation; or whether the stand is growing on good agricultural soil. These are all considerations but they do not determine the rotation period. Jt is, moreover, through the use of growth per cent that we get at the pro- ducing power and usefulness of the stand. This is arrived at through the measurement of the product. All stands that cannot come up to the desired quantity of products should not be considered for felling; they deserve consideration on account of their growing condition for the building up of a good later cut. In normal forests the financial rotation falls at the time when the formula gives a maximum result. A, plus Ds plus. . . Da —(c plus uv plus uNO. Op) u This period of time culminates with the soil rent period, because: Au— Da—. . . Dg —(c—uv) —N. O. Op= (RB, plus N) O. Op—N. OOp= Bu 3 By N is to be understood the soil rent value of the figured rotation “u” or, the value of the soil under normal conditions. Therefore it is shown that the use of the first formula is a roundabout manner of determining the financial rotation; having to figure first the soil value for different rotations it is useless to figure financial rotation by the first formula. In recent times, Martin has used the first formula however with certain changes. He used instead of expected value or cost value the value it would have if of actual use. This is theoretically unreliable. Nothing is gained thereby from a practical standpoint as the determination of the actual value of usefulness of young stands is very difficult and, more often, impossible. B. The Length of the Financial Rotation. The length of the financial rotation is influ- enced by all of the following factors which affect the climax of the soil rent. Of the afore- mentioned facts it is important to note (p. 72). Of great influence is the rate of interest used. For high interest rates you figure short rotations, for low rates long rotations That you exercise care in the general handling and forest management of the two ‘ 202 American Forest Regulation categories of soil;—namely, profitable and unprofitable soil. For the question of putting through and continuing the financial rotation only the productive soils can be given con- sideration as forest soil. In soils belonging to the unprofitable category you figure for pure, even-aged, closed stands with a working interest of 3% a financial rotation of from 60 to 90 years. The absolute length of the rotation depends principally upon the value of older stands to the younger stand. The longer the value continues to increase the longer will be the rotation. Of primary importance is the quality increase. Should the quality increase soon cease and should it not be possible to continue the quality by clearings and liberation cuttings then the rotation will be much lower. In dense even-aged stands the financial cutting period comes later with poorer soil and slower growth, In both cases the quality increase of the wood is concentrated on the higher stand ages. From the measurements by Oberforster Schulze (Allg. Forst und Jagd. Zeit. 1880, p. 329) the financial felling age in the Royal State forests using p= 3% is shown in the following table: SPRUCE. On 2% of the area 1,200 ha. in the 55- 60 years “ 9% “ “ee “ee 5,700 “ee ce ac 60- 65 “c oe 25%: “ ae ay 16,500 “oe ae “e 65- 70 “ “ce 21% “ “ce “ 14,300 “ee “ce “ce 70— 75 a3 “ 21% “ce “ “ce 13,800 “ “ce “ce 75- 80 “ee WL WW UTE Tt «“ eS, “ “ “ “ ‘“é “ “ “ zi Ze ‘“ “ “ 4,800 66 “ “ 80- 85 “ “ z 178 “ “ “ 7,300 “ “ “ S55 90 “ 2% 1,500 90- 95 “ 2% “ “c “c 1,200 “ “ “ 100-10— ‘“ (The highest rotations fall on the ore mountains of Saxony.) PINE. On 72% 0 the area = 1,500 ha. in the 50- 55 years 6 2072 “cc “ 6“ = poe 6c “ “ ae 69 “ “cc 2 Zo “ce ae “ce ar 5s oes “cc “ “ce ue S “ce 19% =— SIFAIOOO 65- 70 ‘ ‘ “cc ‘“c “cc “ “ fe ‘S “ ; 67% “ a r,300 “ “ec “ 70- 75 oP 2 9oee = 2.600 75-80 “ ae 10% “ce ae “oe — 2,200 “oe “ce “ae 8o0- 85 “ For the spruce stands of the Thuringerwalder, Forstmeister Schmidt shows the lengthened time of the financial rotation for the different soils, gotten at by figuring the growth per cent. Figuring p= 3%, the table shows the following average yield per cents: for 87-92 year old stands of II soil 2.74% III soil 2.890% IV soil 3.28% for 95 year old stands on II soil 2.86% ~ IV soil 2.97% for 97-105 year old stands II soil 2.66% [Llsoil2-57% IV soil 3.14% for older stands II soil 2.60% IV soil 2.79% Wimmennaurer figured in three different forests of the Grand Duchy Kissen for the pine II and III stand classes; rotations from 60-70 years when p= 2.5%. He remarks that by introducing liberation cuttings many rotations are reduced from 120 to 100 years. Appendix 203 Oberforster Walter figured, in his forest Grebanare, the following growth per cent values for the pine: (Allg. Forst und Jagd., 1888, p. 202.) Age 60 years 8o years 100 years 120 years for p = 2% $149 $163 $153 $131 Pp = 2.5% . 100 104 93 76 p= 3% 70 68 58 46 C. Estimating the Financial Rotation. For the unprejudiced forester it is needless to say that it is practically impossible to set a definite year for the determination of the financial rotation; .... . . Wean be satisfied if we are able to figure the time of cutting within a ten-year period ..... . we should not speak of one year but of the period of financial cutting . re The computed financial rotation is then an rniestion which serves to tell the time of greatest soil rent according to the given conditions. It indicates a possible point but it should not be taken as the only and inflexible program for regulating the growth per cent. It endeavors to realize from the soil the measurement of its productiveness and to determine the largest obtainable soil rent. The means by which this is secured is not only in obtaining and carrying out the financial rotation but in harnessing and assessing the productive strength of the forest soil. The proper distribution of species, rational systems of management carried to old age, making use of increased growth due to light, reproduction, understory, growing valuable species,—these are the means which the forester can apply and they must be made use of by him in obtaining the highest possible soil rent. (See the work by G. Kraft, dealing with the “Management of the Soil’s Productive Power,’—1800, also,—“Consideration of Forest Valuation,’— 1887. The fundamentals given there are gold nuggets of the German literature and every thinking forester should take them to heart.) When the existing stands are not capable of producing a large enough soil rent (or when in order to obtain a reasonable soil rent a very short rotation is needed) then the means of remedy lie in building up and improving the stand and in part through applying modern technique as a guide in selecting certain kinds of species. These considerations are more fully brought out in the following viewpoints. (a) First consideration for quality are: Clearness of bole, little taper, soundness of the wood. ...... If stocking was incomplete when the stand was started, if the young stand was grazed, if neglected in the thicket or polewood stage, or if damaged by atrocious cutting, or abused through unregulated cuttings or thinnings,—these stands will show no improvement in stocking and will produce chiefly scrubby, poorly formed, branchy and unhealthy trees with excessive taper . aa Such stands are not capable of a high soil rent; on the contrary a low rate of increase in valuable timber is the result. The sooner we clear off such undesirable stands and replace them with more worthy species,—and thereby utilize the full pro- ductive power of the soil—the less will be the loss to the forest owner. . . . (Endres now emphasizes the need for raising timber rather than fuel and poorly shaped poles). (b) It must be concluded that spruce and fir are best grown for timber purposes. Spruce and fir have their principal use as lumber and dimension stuff. It is now a universal fact in the European market that there is no demand for boards wider than 11.4 inches. Squared timbers 13.8 inches in diameter command comparatively low prices; sizes larger than this have practically no sale. The average price paid for spruce timbers in the Royal-State forests during the ten years 1880-1889 per cubic meter :— Per 1000 Increase in price Average diameter Per cu. m. board feet per cu m. 5.9 inches $2.50 $10.00 sa dl Ost tor; ou Sts 3.07 12.28 $0.57 Oi cerry. 3S 4.02 16.08 05 The Teer 108 4.65 18.60 .63 over 14.2 4:75 19.00 .10 204 American Forest Regulation Timbers over 14.2 inches in diameter as compared to those from 11.8 to 14.2 in diameter have a quality increase of only $.10 per cubic meter. The largest increase in price lies in the timbers between 9. to 11.4 inches. Regarding the sale of construction timber the conditions are not much different. The industries of modern times demand tron for the heavier uses. The buildings that formerly used heavy fir timbers for girders now use metal; for other uses, where formerly very strong beams were required, they obtain the same strength by joining several pieces together. It becomes necessary for the mills to cut out of large logs smaller sized dimension timber and boards according to the sizes called for. Oberforster Karl observed the same conditions for the Alsace-Lorraine and Klein markets. It is interesting to note that the fir (the so called “Holland wood”), which was raised purposely in the Black Forest for heavy timbers no longer is demanded; already there is an over-supply . “These latter, or so called standard sizes are the most saleable and can be disposed of in large quantities. In view of the fact that the imcrease in growth of the older trees at 120 years will be at the highest only 1.5% and the increase in price from standard grade to “Holland wood” (largest size) will be at the most $.25 per cubic meter, it can be easily figured what will become of the profits if we raise large sized fir timbers . The practice of growing large timber can only be continued for pie and oak. For these timbers you can command a high price and they are sought after... .. . But it can not be believed that the increase in quality by raising large tunber of these species will com- pensate for the higher soil charge. In connection with the increase in price that is achieved you have a longer producing period to consider. Only in case you can so handle the forest through thinnings that the larger timbers are produced in reasonably short rotations is the growing of such material possible. It is probably only possible on good soils and in connection with a two storied forest. (c) Pure beech stands are not suitable for earning reasonable financial returns. Up to 1840, pure beech forests were found in great abundance due, primarily, to its prolific natural reproduction. The beech was highly prized for its fuel value and no one would have thought that during the development of the railroads and within a ten year period coal would replace the wood as fuel. The later attempts to encourage the use of beech for lumber have been unsuccessful. The per cent of lumber produced (by pure beech) is very small, only 20% at the most, and then the lumber prices are not much above those received for cord wood. Even an exceptionally clear piece of beech lumber will not be worth more than a similar sized piece of soft wood. Where the beech thrives best are good sites for softwoods and they will give a proportionally larger yield. If softwood is the primary species, beech can be grown as an understory and, owing to the beneficial effect on the soil and tendencies to cause a better development of the bole in the softwoods and remaining hardwoods, it would raise the income of the stand indirectly. “Tn such a practice one should not forget that the beech is used only as an improver of the dominant species which earns the highest soil rent. In other words it ts a means to an end. Through proper forest management it is possible to restrict its development on its natural site . APPENDIX B. GROWING STOCK AND YIELD, HARVARD FOREST. The ascertainment of the annual yield, or total amount of saw timber to be cut annually from the Forest was based upon a rough consideration of area, age and volume. In the beginning only those stands were reckoned with which contained 50% or more of white pine, since hardwood timber was comparatively unprofitable, and yield tables applying to it were not available. The rotation and the mean annual increment for the whole area were determined from a yield table for white pine made by L. Margolin and published by the New Hampshire Forest Commission in 1906. Since quality increment in most of the pure pine type is unimportant, the rotation for the bulk of the Forest was fixed at 60 years which is not far from the point where the Appendix 205 mean annual growth in volume culminates. For arriving at the amount of the annual cut, the preliminary field work supplied the following data: a total stand of saw timber amounting to 10,500,000 ft.; a tabulation of areas according to type and age. Being almost wholly second growth the stand was everywhere classifiable into blocks of uniform age. The growing stock could thus be summarized in three periods of twenty years each covering the duration of the rotation. The mean annual increment, as derived from the yield table, was found to be approximately 250,000 ft. From the Summary according to age and area, it was possible to determine in which periods of the rotation, as compared with the normal representation of age classes, the growing stock was deficient and by how much. Considering the total volume of the stand and the surplus of volume in the third period, the theoretical allowable annual cut would have been about 325,000 ft. On account of the lack of tried silvicultural methods and the need of a good reserve of sizable timber for future scientific purposes, it was decided to put the annual cut at the conservative figure of 250,000 ft. or the annual increment of the pine-bearing lands of the forest. The succeeding cuttings in mature timber have . been kept for ten years at this figure and a total of 2,500,000 ft. of lumber have been marketed. A reassessment of the growirg stock and increment was undertaken in 1919. As a consequence of the absolute increase in productive forest area due to the planting of blank land and to release cuttings, and due to the inclusion of hardwood stands now merchantable but omitted in the first computation, the annual increment, exclusive of cordwood, is now found to be 380,000 board feet and the total volume of the growing stock 12,435,000 board feet. For additional data see Harvard Forest Bulletin No. 1, 1921. APPENDIX C. EXAMPLE OF A PRELIMINARY POLICY STATEMENT FOR INYO NATIONAL FOREST. The following is a discussion of existing conditions and the future timber policy of the Inyo: Dependency and Local Demand: In the absence of transmountain transportation against which the high Sierras would seem to constitute a permanent barrier, the only local timber supply available for Owens Valley and vicinity is embraced in the Inyo (Mono Mills Block of the Mono National Forest). The dependency area is defined as Owens Valley north of Owens Lake, Deep Spring and Fish Lake Valleys, and the mining camps in Nevada north to and including the mining camp of Candelaria. The bulk of the population of this area is located in the northern part of Owens Valley in the vicinity of Bishop and Big Pine, Bishop being the logical center for manufacture and distribution. The Southern Pacific narrow gauge railroad would make possible distribution to the entire-population with the exception of a few ranchers in Fish Lake Valley and Deep Spring Valley. The dependency area has a population of 5,550 people with a present annual use of 4,000M ft. of sawed material and 3,000 cords of fuel, fence posts and other similar cord materials. All cord material and approximately 15% of 600M ft. B. M. of sawed material was supplied from the Forest, the remaining 3,400 M ft. B. M. sawed material being supplied from shipped in products largely from the Truckee region. No material increases in the use of cord material is anticipated in the near future. The Southern Pacific Co. is contemplating standard gauging the present narrow gauge road through Owens Valley, which would probably lead to cheaper coal, with the result that less wood would be used as fuel, which decrease would probably in a short period of years be compensated for by the increased demand due to increase in population, further division of ranch property, etc. The present demand for building material will probably remain more or less constant for a number of years. There is, however, a rapid development in the fruit industry apparent in the near future which will probably increase the demand by some two million feet of box material within the next fifteen to twenty years. According to 206 American Forest Regulation figures obtained from Mr. Dixon, County Horticulturist, the present use and increase for the next five years will be as follows: Boxes of fruit shipped during 1920 (all fruits) 35,000 boxes Estimated for TO2% ondicetn oe beens S oi 200;060 974)" “ee “ee Estimated for 1p25 02. /22% ta ss eles 300,000“ Also the shipment of honey from the Valley during 1920 required 10,000 boxes, making a total requirement for 1925 of at least 310,000 boxes, which it is estimated would requiré about 2,000 M ft. B. M. of box material in the rough. When taken into consideration that the available stand of timber runs at least 50% of box and shop grades, this rapidly growing demand for box material is very fortunate as making possible practically 100% utilization of the entire product, a large per cent of which could not otherwise be utilized locally. In view of the above statements, it would appear that the local demand for lumber products within the dependent area would be increased to at least 7,000,000 ft. within the next twenty years, possibly con- suming that much as an average for the period. Available Supply of Commercial Saw Timber: The supply of commercial saw timber is confined to the northern portion of the Forest, the Casa Diablo block, the Mammoth and Summit blocks; the total stand according to cruise of 1907 by Mr. Eldridge is 670,000 M ft. B. M. : Timber cut during the past season showed an average age of approximately 130 years, which if taken as a basis of rotation would indicate that the local demand would exceed the annual yield of the available stand within the next twenty years. Condition and Accessibility: The entire stand of timber is largely mature, the Mam- moth Block particularly being over-mature as indicated by flat and spike tops and other indications common in an aged stand. Also this block shows unmistakable indications of a more or less general insect infestation. (Dendroctonus, according to reports by Mr. Hopping.) The only sawmill on the Forest is also located at the south edge of this block, being operated during the past summer to the extent of 622,000 board feet cut. The State Highway, which has been greatly improved during the past few years, connects this block of timber with Bishop, the distance being 48 miles from Bishop to the present plant. The Casa Diablo block is approximately 20 miles nearer to Bishop than the Mammoth block, but besides being a much younger, more thrifty stand which should not be cut at the present, is also shorter, poorer grade timber and though a shorter distance from market, the road is such that it is doubtful if transportation costs would be less than from the Mammoth block. Several attempts to market local lumber in competition with shipped in products were made prior to 1912, that season apparently being the last attempt, which was by the Home Lumber Company. The reason for this seems to have been due to three factors: 1. There was no market for box grades and no means provided for their manu- facture. 2. Road conditions were extremely unfavorable as compared with present condi- tions and the motor truck as a means of transportation had not at that time developed to any extent, making its use impracticable. 3. The low prices of lumber prevailing at the time. Present operators, F. M. and A. W. Hess, fully recognize the fact that to market their production, which is 50% box and shop grades, it will be necessary to provide means of manufacture in order to market those grades at a profit. The transportation problem has been greatly reduced through improvement of the road by the State, and the development of the motor truck as a means of transportation, and it is figured by Hess Brothers from the past season’s experience that it will cost approximately $10.00 per thousand under present conditions, as cost of trucks and operating expense, to freight their product from the mill to the Bishop yard. Also the present price for lumber would justify a much greater expenditure to place the lumber on the market than was the case at the time the Home Lumber Company failed. Appendix . 207 Sale Policy: 1. In recognition of the fact that Owens Valley and adjacent community must eventually be entirely dependent on the timber within the Forest for a local lumber supply, no timber should be sold in the future that will allow exportation beyond the limits of the dependent community. 2. The Mammoth block of timber showing signs of disease and insect infestation, besides being equally as accessible as any other block of saw timber, should be cut first and sales for the time being confined to this block. 3. The main object of our whole sales policy should be to build up a local lumbering industry that will eventually supply the needs of Owens Valley to the fullest extent possible from the local product without exceeding the annual yield of the available stand, which, exclusive of the Mono Mills block of the Mono Forest, would be approxi- mately 5,000 M ft. B. M. of an annual cut. The project is too small to hope to interest large lumbermen and must, therefore, in all probability start in a small way from local capital and build more or less gradually against strong competition from the outside, which at present: controls the market. Therefore in order to assist the local operator to meet outside competition, which may or may not be based on the cost of production but rather with a view of eliminating the local operator, such sales as would tend to create competition in the manufacture of the local products should be discouraged until the local product has reached the proportions of an industry and established its market. Until such times as the local industry will have established itself there can be no necessity for limiting the selling price of the local operator when we cannot limit the selling price of the shipped in product in case the local operator is forced out of business. At such time as the local industry has firmly established itself we should then undertake regulation of selling price based on cost of production as we would have by that time sufficient information on the cost of production on which to base a fair selling price. 4. Our minimum annual cut required by contract has, it seems, in some cases, forced a local operator into bankruptcy, due to the fact that his competitors lowered the price of lumber to the extent that he could not market his production at a profit, his finances being limited, and our minimum cut requirement forcing him to operate at a loss. Therefore, for the time being at least, we should place our minimum annual cut at a very low figure, and if necessary, waive it entirely if it will assist the local operator in his fight to continue his business. 5. There is no question but that the present stumpage price of $2.50 a thousand for yellow pine and $1.50 a thousand for fir both red and white does not represent the full stumpage value of the timber, but in order to assist the local operator to meet competition from the outside, I do not believe this price should be raised until such time as the local operation has shown that to raise the stumpage price will not eliminate the operation entirely. Timber Needed for Forest Development: All timber within the headwaters of Pine Creek, Bishop Creek, Rock Creek and north from Rock Creek to Mammoth Mountain, lying on the slope of the main Sierras, should be withheld from sale, commercial or otherwise, except for use within the area involved. This area has a very light stand of timber and great value for power development, irrigation, storage and recreation and it is practically certain that all of the timber within this area will be needed for its development. Supply of Fuel, Fence Posts, and Similar Material: The present population of Owens Valley and almost the entire population dependent on the Inyo Forest for fuel, fence posts, and other similar materials, is located between Manzanar and Chalfant (see map). That portion of the Forest bordering the Valley on either side embraces a sufficient stand of timber to supply all future needs for cord material. The best estimate of this timber being that given in connection with land classifi- cation, and which places it at some 380,000 cords, which is approximately 80% Pinon pine, 15% Foxtail pine and 5% other species. Taking into consideration present use and possible future development of both community and Forest, and the administration 208 American Forest Regulation of the Forest, the source of supply and the community are divided into three separate units of supply and dependency. This division is thought advisable for three reasons: 1. To prevent overcutting by the community as a whole within the area on which a portion of the community is logically most directly dependent, and thereby necessi- tating in later years, back haul of the same material. 2. Wagon roads and other means of access will be necessary in the near future in order to obtain fuel and post timber. To get the necessary improvements and to properly distribute the cost of same, it is thought that some form of organization will be necessary, and to reduce the size of the community to be dealt with in each case, and to properly assure them that what they develop will be available only for a limited community, will make it comparatively easy to promote the necessary development. 3. In the proposed division, one or more units in the dependency and use conform to administrative districts which gives the ranger the advantage of knowing his users and the opportunity by assisting them in a plan of development, to group his cutting instead of having them scattered as at present throughout the district. In making these divisions, the pains was taken to obtain sufficient information regard- ing population and use of material by the different communities, to make sure that each community would be supplied indefinitely with timber suitable for fuel and ranch development; the amount of timber and population in each unit being as follows: Area No. 1, or the Aberdeen Independence area: Has a population of 1,100 people with a wood supply provided of 88,882 cords. Area No. 2, Big Pine-Tinnemaha area: Has a population of 1,200 people, 121,362 cords. Area No. 3, population of 3,256 people, has a timber supply of 168,469 cords. It is planned to confine both free use and sale of all cord materials within each community to the area on which that community is logically dependent, as outlined on the map. Free use will be issued only for dead, insect infested timber. Commercial sales to be made in any quantity, but only for delivery within the community. S-22 sales will be issued for both dead and green material, being limited as near as consistent with the law under which these sales are made, to dead, diseased and insect infested timber. There is at present no large demand for S-22 sales outside of the dependency areas as outlined, and we shall endeavor to confine sales of this nature to these areas. Very truly yours, (Signed) ZT J. JONES; Forest Supervisor. DECEMBER 14, 1920. APPENDIX D. RESULTS OBTAINED BY FRENCH WORKING PLANS IN SAVOIE FROM ORIGINAL FIGURES SUPPLIED BY A. SCHAEFFER (CONSERVATEUR; SERVICE DES: EAUX') ET iFORETS),. * The recovery which this region has made under French forest management is a lasting tribute to the foresters of the Republic. This region was only ceded by Italy in 1860, and prior to that date the forest had been overcut and damaged, the prices were low, and there was a large amount of overmature diseased timber. A. Schaeffer, for many years chief of working plans, with headquarters at Grenoble, has studied the rotation, cutting period, stand per hectare, increment, and financial yield before and after past working plan revisions, and has proved that the conservative management * See pages 37-38, “Studies in French Forestry,” John Wiley & Sons. ! HECTARE eters ) NAME OF THE FOREST Beginning of the present rotation (All selection fellings) Average Old timber timber Total FIVE FIRST CLA Nancy sur Cluses (1st W. G.) 174 276 450 Habére Lullin ............4. | 180 154 334 Thones Walley sine csr avetste bie ss 187 303 490 Vigny Mathonex (2d W. G.) 54 474 528 Vercland (1st W. G.) .....-- 99 200 209 Average (fractions omitted) 138++ 231+ 420 FIVE SECOND CL ET ATS 2. © Sis aap DOL OD OOOUC 096 158 254 Petit Bornand (1st W. G. (pic) | 102 88 190 SE. Pall. «sa « Sats aie elniaintoiets 118 83 201 IROGHALK «2-612; /Geieelarm ema 2s 136 123 250 Montgilbert .......0ssscceees 93 155 248 Average (fractions omitted 109 121 230 | FOUR THIRD CLA Bourg St. Maurice (1st W. G. 160 94 254 Macot (ist We Ga)ieceieura ors 156 60 216 do (2d W. G.) et eratana wie se ie.te 156 52 208 Villaroger (3d W. G.) ...... 150 137 287 Average (fractions omitted 155 86 241 SIX FOURTH CL/ Ito Foy (2d W. G.) seek oe... 73 92 165 do (3d) WG.) toi ace 100 63 163 do (5th W. G.) Siale Roo were 93 34 127 Tignes (sd W... Gi), ockew eens 48 58 106 Val d’Isére (3d W. G.) ....4 31 ~ 38 Villaroger (1st W. G.) ...... 70 77 156 Average (fractions omitted 71 55 126 Appendix 209 introduced by the French is successful. These forests, classed according to yield pro- duction, may be grouped in four classes: j 1. Those forests with a yield of over 6 cubic meters (211.9 cubic feet) per hectare (2.5 acres) per year. These are found on the sandstones, schists, warm calcareous soils, and alluvial soils near the lakes of Geneva, Annecy, and Bourget. Such yields are almost comparable with the famous Jura and Vosges. 2. The second- and third-class forests are yields between 4 and 6 meters (141.3 and 211.9 cubic feet) and between 3, 4, and 2 meters (141.3 and 70.6 cubic feet) respectively. Here, either the soil or the climatic conditions are naturally poor producers. Some- times this intermediate yield is due to the mediocre combination of both climate and soil. 4. The fourth class of forests is where the production is less than :2 cubic meters (70.6 cubic feet) per hectare (2.5 acres) per year. These are located in the high valleys or rocky slopes where the climate is severe or relatively dry. The table: Results of Forestry Management in Savoie, France, faces this page. From a study of these figures the following conclusions can be made: (1) *Under the fairly intensive conditions existing in Savoie the area of the work- ing group increases with poorer soil conditions, except that towards the limit of tree growth the groups are small including only the slow growing Alpine forests. (2) After the rotations are once correctly established there is little or no change. The length of the rotation increases with poorer soil quality. (3) Without changes in local conditions the cutting cycles tend to remain the same. (4) With forest management there is a tendency (in France) to increase the growing stock and with selection forests it is essential to have a mathematical check on the marking. With the French method of 1883 the average timber should be % and the old timber 54 the total volume. This is empirically true, so if at the revision of a working plan, it appears that the proportion is not being maintained this fact should influence the marking during the next cutting cycle. This also illustrates the necessity in selection forests of not cutting to a strict diameter limit, but rather according to the needs of the stand as a whole. It is also necessary to have in mind an empirically normal selection stand per acre to steer by before attempting to mark the stand. (5) The present current yield is a useful check on the yield allowed; the relation between the current increment and the yield is never a fixed ratio unless the forest is normal. (6) With wise forest management there is usually increased yield until the abnormal forest becomes more nearly normal but the silvicultural condition of the stand often precludes too rapid an economy in growing stock. (7) With wise forest management the money yield is constantly increasing; and with the gradual increase in stumpage prices which is going on all over the world (and with the diminishing value of money) this increase will probably never cease if there is continued and wise management. This is one of the greatest arguments for forestry as a conservative investment where there is certain protection and permanent (public) ownership. (8) As would be expected the expenses diminish with the less valuable soils but not in the ratio of diminished revenue. (9) A change in the proportion of the species in a selection forest under natural regeneration is slow and difficult without artificial assistance. This indicates how futile it is for management officers to plan sweeping changes in species ratio without figuring the cost of planting or sowing—unless a radical and perhaps dangerous change in management is contemplated. (10) After a term of years the effect of correct forest management on an under- stocked forest is very similar to the increase in capital assets of an industrial enterprise *The paragraph numbers refer to the column numbers of the foregoing table. = 7 ae — 73 — a ROTSTION TTING (4) (s) 6 cU ie oo a oe er imo YIELD MONEY YIELD PER HECTARE E © (9) Present (Cubic meters) (Francs) ; Se eEeRE PROPORT ION OF SPECIES (Years) ears AME OF THE FOREST need a Rte N. et ‘prt et ae of the ere rotation Eeeaniol of ae ical rotation Increment Before the revision After th isi 2 Hectares , A verage h * F er the revision Fy Former Present Former Present timber timber Total timber timber Total a eters) Former Present ue pert! Total ee pave ny eters the After iil: 3 produc’ roducts Total isi asi i, Nancy sur Cluses (1st W.G.) 121 162 162 18 8 168 ~ ie i oe FIRST CLASS FORESTS P o! revision revision Before After 4 7 450 6.2 3.08 6.2 37-5 1.0 38.5 64,0 sae 65.0 2G 46 Spruce 65 ri ; ‘ b ir 0 Habére Lullin ..... ey | a8) 144 144 16 16 142 81 223 180 154 334 He! Beech 3 do 5. 18 5.0 20.5 2.5 23.0 51.5 25 54.0 38 6 Se: 85 Thones Ville .....-.+++5 dress. (X24 144 144 16 16 211 229 440 ” 187 303 400 6 A Diverse 7 do io 39 .6 43.1 2.5 45.6 82,0 2.5 84.5 4.0 4.0 oo 38 i Joe ; Ht 3 Vigny Mathonex (2d W. G.) 32 162 162 18 18 66 340 406 54 474 528 A 8 Diverse Io we 7 3. 89 27.0 18 28.8 62.0 1.8 63.8 27 5 Spruce 85 Vercland (1st W. G.) «-----++ 173 180 180 18 18 82 142 san a br . 3. Fir 15 do A i 6. ‘ Average (fractions omitted) 96 158 158 17 1 299 2 1.95 3.1 22.0 0.5 22.5 40. os 40.5 By Spruce 80 Spruce 7 140 200 340 138+ 231-+ 420 76 2 6 0 Fir 10 Fir ; 9 . 30. 17 317 60. 7 61.7 ae an Bee 10 Beech y P 7 FIVE SECOND CLASS FORESTS wk zs 5 D Laeier 2... cccncasencocnnsncee 26 180 180 a0 a 81 sit, re 96 a A jiverse I 54 4.9 2.0 38 8.3 0.2 8.5 21.9 a ae Spruce 24 Petit Bornand (1st W.G.(pic)) 137 144 176 16 Pe ; % ax 34 Fir 57 do. 2 8&3 145 102 88 190 43 ae #0 ao eect 19 ‘ U 2 0.5 10.4 23.6 i Pruce 79 Spruce St. Paul .......--+++++ asesere 428 180 180 oa a 87 0.5 24.1 3.5 4.0 aie 6 Fir 48 135 118 83 201 41 08 20 verse 24 Diverse , : i 5:3 2.4 77 15.6 24 18.0 an Spruce 80 Spruce Rognaix .....+0+-e+eeeeeee Ach: 74 162 162 18 8 va e ; 4.0 is 10 Fir 141 136 123 250 58 0.9 3.0 8 jiverse 10 Diverse Rises . 7. 40 11.8 17.6 40 On aa 8 Spruce 52 Spruce fontgilbert .......2+sesseeeee 211 144 144 36 16 38 a ee b 3 iis 15 Fir Average (fractions omitted eS 155 248 59 19 38 8 Mies Be Divers ge ions omitted) 177 162 168 18 18 és 14. 1.2 16.0 38.3 12 Spruce 25 72 88 160 { 39-5 3.0 35 Fir 09 121 230 5. 14 3.2 i 72 no change E 9.2 17 10.9 23.4 17 25.1 a Ee pies 3 b j Spruce 5 Gates oacAs hue WiELe aes a ; : FOUR THIRD CLASS FORESTS Divers a u 1 176 60 236 ; Macot (1st W. G.) ...-.-..00+ sl eo 94 254 2. d ; ( ) 306 162 162 18 8 “7 - its Ms 9 1.75 2.6 10.0 2.0 120 10.1 xe en oe é Spruce 63 Spruce do (2 W.G.) -ee seen 200 es ws 15 60 216 34 12 Ls Ge 3 Bien <2 Larch 162 18 18 142 0 a I : I 1.2 7-2 12.0 1.2 13.2 ie iverse 9 Diverse 3 172 156 52 208 3.2 te i 14 Spruce 70 Villaroger (3d W. G.) .....-- 273 Feared Ra 586 ; 3 5:5 1.2 6.7 10.4 1.2 116 aes =a ite 25 no change 15 1 si : ‘ Average (fractions omitted) 288 Gr se e 149 123 272 150 137 287 3.0 aa 5G ie an Spruce ;” é é K , i 13.0 24. 2 Dj 7 Hf 152+ 61+ 214 155 86 241 34 1.6 2 be a se 47 45 Pineand —F 10 do i I 82 15 9.7 1.4 15 178 a) 2.1 Se ‘ I ice 7 Ito Foy (2 W. G) «-.s00e0- 133 | ES | Gabears |e _— | SIX FOURTH CLASS FORESTS Larch 2 Pine Pine j 20, 63 97 160 rse a 73 92 165 A do (3d W.G.) ...... a 90 ptareh 1206 (Larch aoe HY we 7, 9.6 1.4 11.0 13.6 14 15.0 mG Dy Sia 95 20 20 = 2. . ine ani do do. "CsthiW.G))......... 171 ae a3 38 163 100 63 163 1.6 1.6 6 Larch 5 216 20 20 80 4 I 9.6 1.4 11.0 128 14 Spruce 90 30 110 14.2 2.6 2.6 La Tignes (34 W. G. % 34 azz 17 08 12 Hae dhe do MGA ueciecss%c. « 193 { Soruce 180 rie. 180 4 : 4.0 1.4 5.4 0.6 1.4 TD 6 ay an Fir sf Larch 240 {Pome 240 20 38 39 7 48 58 106 18 " : {earch ae A Val d'Isére (3d W. G.) ...... 79 a2 E 5) 0.77 2.6 0.4 3.0 4.6 0.4 a 252 21 21 22 ‘ #5 ee 5 19 2.1 { Larch 80 Vv; 7 3 07 nt pruce 20 do laraeer\(raeW:/G.) <.-<<:s a eho s. a 17 0.22 1.4 O.1 15 1.8 O.1 1.90 18 Average (fracti c; 15 15 83 ba “ 1.9 Larch 90 (fractions omitted) 116 22 = 143 79 7 156 17 me a Cembro 10 do 19 19 6 ‘ 4 wa 14 8.6 , 5 48 113 71 55 126 16 ra eG eS me % ae o es hea 2 ; b 1, 6. i ar 5 k 7 88 as 9.8 2.6 27+ Spruce 6 oe — ‘ ) Larch ha I Diverse 210 American Forest Regulation which is being continually strengthened by wise administration. Gradually as th company retires its indebtedness and expands, the value of the stock doubles or triples. Wisely administered forests fatten in the same manner. APPENDIX E. EXAMPLES OF YIELD CALCULATIONS FROM NATIONAL FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANS, 1921. On November 22, 1921, each District Forester of the Forest Service was written to as follows: | ; “In looking through the literature on working plans I find that there is. a paar dearth of material on actual working plans in the United States. The reason for this is obvious. If you have any plans in preparation or practically in final form, could you send me a sample of the method you used in calculating the yield, citing actual figures used? Could you also send me a sample of one of your most interesting policy statements where a working plan is not yet required? What do you estimate to be the cost per acre of an extensive management plan, (A) for field work, including estimates and growth studies, and (B) office work, including report, maps, and computations.” The data received (up to March I, 1922) is listed by districts: District I. Missoula. No data received. District II. Denver. The usual policy statements are in force and management plans are being prepared for the Harney and Black Hills National Forests. District III. Albuquerque. “Policy statements have been prepared for most of the Forests.” The Apache is an-example of an extensive timber policy plan. It is divided into two parts: (a) South End (chiefly cordwood) and (b) North End (chiefly timber). (a) The cordwood policy is to protect water sheds, supply local needs, increase yield for Clifton market, protect recreational requirements. Cordwood sales are to be con- fined “to dead material until accessible supply is gone.” Cutting of green cordwood will be on a very conservative basis. Only improvement cuttings will be allowed along Clifton-Springerville highway and at recreation areas. (b) Irrigation and recreation must be protected and enough timber to supply local market must be retained from export sales. Large scale sales will eventually be neces- sary to develop timber resources. Western yellow pine will probably be handled ona 200-year rotation, 100-year cutting cycles, and 70% to 80% of the stand will be removed. One hundred million feet in the northwest corner is withheld from sale for 20 years for the Apache Lumber Company now operating in bordering territory. About two billion feet is available for the general market. For intensive working plan data see Part II of this volume for details taken from the Coconino working plan. Costs have averaged .o5 for field and .o1 for office work. District IV. Ogden. Under date of December 2, 1921 the District Forester writes: “The supervisors . . . . have been reading, thinking and talking about forest manage- ment foralong time... . A great dearth of usable data on actual regulation... The ease with which low grade coast timber comes into competition with our local supply has prevented exploitation of any but the most accessible stands .... No definite results are available to date.’ Up to now general policy statements have filled the need for regulation. District V. San Francisco. See appendix C for a complete copy of the Inyo Forest Policy statement which is considered one of the best produced by any district in the Forest Service. The data which follows for the Eastern Larsen Working Circle is from a rough draft not yet approved by the Forester. According to the District Forester: “Since our basic data is rough, we feel that it is a useless waste of time to make elaborate, detailed, technical calculations of yield.” The cost of the field work, including growth studies, Appendix 211 was about $.13 per acre with 7/10 of a cent extra for office. The extra cost of manage- ment plans (working plans) is estimated at $.02 per acre above “preliminary timber survey work”... . The proposed rotation is 120 years, the net area 160,500 acres, the total merchantable stand 2,870,000 M feet of which 75% to 80% is cut at the first logging. The loss from the decadent trees is considered offset by the growth in younger age classes. If the cutting cycle is 60 years, cut = 36 million; if 50 years, 44 million; if 40 years, 55 million; if 30 years, 73 million. The timber is extremely decadent. A 40-year cutting cycle “is about the shortest period of return that would assure a sufficient stand to justify profitable logging” . “There are included within the confines of the proposed initial sale area to the Fruit Growers the greatest portion of the most decadent stands and also a body of timber that is the most isolated and the poorest in quality of any in the working circle. The argument for a rapid cut-over applies more particularly to this area than to the remainder of the working circle. A suggested compromise would therefore be to make an initial sale to the Fruit Growers upon conditions that would apply the conservative marking practice that cuts about 80% of the merchantable timber and which would allow an average annual cut of 40 to 50 million feet and at the termination of this sale, to make a second sale reducing the cut to about 25,000 M feet which would be com- parable to a strictly sustained yield. It is believed that this compromise plan adequately protects the best interests of the Forest Service and fulfills the primary object of management to harmonize best the prescriptions of silviculture, sustained yield, and sound economics. I therefore recommend the adoption of this plan.” District VI. Portland. According to Hanzlik: “Thus far in my calculations regarding the sustained yield, I have used what may be called arithmetical method, checked by some of the standard formulae, Von Mantel’s and Hufnagl’s coming about the closest, although I consider that both of these give too high a cut from our present type of forests in the Douglas fir region. It is difficult to explain clearly the arithmetical method used; it is what may be called a “cut-and- try” method starting with a cut based on one of the above formula and then carrying out through a rotation or two the theoretical stands resulting from a decrease of the mature stand and an increase, based on standard yield tables, in the present immature stands and the cut-over areas as development proceeds. As an illustration, using the North Santiam Working Circle, Von Mantel’s formula Y= we get Y= 000.000 or Y — 100,000 M feet B.M., basing the cut on a stand ¢4 of 4 billion feet and an 80-year rotation. ; Hufnagl’s formula takes into consideration the increment from the immature timber, and in this case we have the following to start with: V— 4,000,000 feet B. M. (mature volume). Immature growth: 31,000 acres 8o years old. 6,000 “e 40 “ iz3 38;0001'| Sin 710 “cc “ The increment for this circle is based on Site II, Douglas fir yield tables, and is esti- mated as being 60% stocked when compared to the stocking from which the Standard tables were constructed. It is obtained by a summation of the increments of the various immature age classes taken at one-half the rotation period, thus: Present Age Area M. A. I. 40 yrs. hence* Total M. A. I. 40 years Years Acres feet B. M. per acre hence—M. feet B. M. 10 38,000 258 9,800 ~ 40 6,000 375 2,200 80 31,000 404 12,500 Substituting in Hufnagl’s formula: : V+a ge hy 4,600,060 "NE 4.24, ¢00 ‘NP 3<2° a a a Y = ————__, Y= — = r 80 - 3 4,000,000 M + (24,500 M X 20) _ 4,490,000 M — 112,250 M ft. B. M. 40 40 The yields, Y, as obtained by these formulae are used only as an indicative factor * Based on Site II, Douglas fir yield tables, present immature stands stocked 60% of standard stocking. 212 American Forest Regulation whereby the recommended yield is finally determined, this final yield being made b the arithmetical method as mentioned previously.” Costs have depended on the amount of intensive estimating (10 cents per acre), bu the district plans to keep working plans simple and inexpensive. The Row Rive Plan will cost 7/1o cents per acre. District VII. Washington, D. C. No data received. APPENDIX F. COMMENT ON WOLFF FORMULA. The above graph* is based on the figures of table 9. This is intended to depict the distribution in volume on 60 acres based on a 60-year rotation, to obtain a normal stock with the yields for each period. Up to the age 20, at which the first yield figure is given, the growth has been a straight line from the age zero. Then by the yield table method, the normal stock would equal in volume the shaded portion comprising the polygon A-B-C-D-E-F-L-G. The triangle A-O-G is necessarily omitted since the growth that it represents cannot be estimated. To make the yield table method com- parable to the original unmodified zee method of obtaining normal stock, this triangle would in theory have to be included. Now by Moore’s method, the normal stock obtained would be included in the triangle G-F-L. The area therein included happens to be fairly close to that of the polygon above described, since the portions of the shaded area above the line G-F are almost great enough to balance the unshaded portions included below the line G-F. On the other hand, by Wolff’s formula, the area included is the trapezoid A-F-L-G, Here the growth is a straight line between A-F, as is the case in Moore’s formula between G-F. It is patent, in this case, that there is vastly more of the unshaded portion included than there is excluded of the shaded portions; also, that the result would be still more in excess of the yield table method than Moore’s formula gives. Comparisons of the three methods will likely yield similar relative positions when the mean annual growth before rotation age is less than at rotation age, especially if the mean annual growth is constantly increasing to a maximum at the rotation age (giving a “concave” curve) and where the age, as in the example given, is very low. While neither Moore’s nor Wolff’s formula gives the correct figure (as determined by the yield table) the method suggested by Wolff is mathematically the most correct. It will be found that the nearer the “estimateable’” age approaches the rotation age, the closer will be the results by the Wolff formula to those of the yield table method and the further away the results by the Moore formula. Vice-versa, the younger the “estimateable”’ age or the further away from the rotation age, the more closely will the results by the Moore formula and the yield table method approach, and in fact the more accurate will tend to be the original = method of obtaining the normal stock. As pointed out, if the lineaments of the yield curve change,—a not improbable possi- bility—these relations will change. The Wolff formula will usually give the best figures because when approximating the curve by a straight line, the Wolff method is mathematically correct and the Moore formula is mathematically wrong. * See page 63 for this graph kindly supplied and discussed by Wolff. It was learned after this text was set up that H. H. Chapman had lectured on this problem as early as 1909, but had never published. TN DEX, Age classes in regulation, 56,* 101, 124, 131, I5I, 153, 157, 160, 166 averages, 154 immature, etc., 157 in selection forest, 124, 160 table of, in Kingdom of Saxony, 184 table of, in Prussia, 177 Albuquerque, 210 Allen, E. T., 46 Allotment methods, defined, 91 by area, oI by area-volume, 93 by volume, 93 compared with stand method, 100 principles, 94, 114 Alsace-Lorraine, 194, 204 Aménagement (see working plans in France) American method, determination of cut by (Part II, see also regulation, and cutting cycles), 105 Annual cut (see regulation) Annual plans, 5 Apache, forest policy of, 210 Appendix, 175 Area, determination of cut by (see fixed area, and allotment by area) Area-volume allotment, differs from stand method, roo Ash, 48, 49 Ashe, W. W.., 32, 43, 47 Attitude of private owners, 105 Austrian formula, determination of cut by, 72, 79, 80 illustration, 82 summary, 81 Baur, 35 Biolley, H. E., 20, 69, 78 Blackjack (see western yellow pine) Blascheck, A. D., 30 Block (see also management subdivisions), defined, 24 discussed, 25 Brandis method (see Indian method), 86 Breymann’s method, determination of cut by, 72, 80 British India, 5 Bureau of Forestry, 6 Capital, definition of kinds of, 39 Carter, C. E., preface Chamonix working plan, 30, 85 Chapman, H. H., author of Part II, preface, 105 references to works of, 5, 34, 37, 126, 151, 152, 212 Chapman, C. S., 16 Chestnut, 34 Coconino forest working plan, 102, 128, 157, 160, 210 Compartment (see management sion), defined, 24 discussed, 25 subdivi- *The numbers refer to pages and not to para- graphs. Control and revision (see working plans, control and revision of) Control book, 179 in Austria (management book), 199 in Prussia, 179 Coppice, 91, 178, 196 with standards, 91, 196 Cork oak, regulation of, 90 Correlation of age and diameter, 154 Cotta, 182 Crown spread (see Gazin), 138 Current annual increment, 131, 140 Cutting and planting record (see control book) Cutting cycle, 28, 109 and cut per acre, 110 illustration of, 118 illustration of in normal forest, 112 intermittent yields in, 126 long cutting cycles, 117 preliminary, 125 short when possible, 117 summary, 133, 135 transitional, 126 Cutting cycles and felling reserve, regulation by, Ior formula for regulation of cut, 127 illustration, 128, 129, 136 second cutting cycle (trial balance), 172 shortening of, 163 Cutting plans, annual in Austria, 199 in Prussia, 178 Cutting series (see syn., felling series) D’Arcy, W. E., 28 Density of stand, 159 Denver, 210 Department of Agriculture, 7 Secretary of, 7 Determination of cut, 68 by area (fixed). go by area allotment, 91 by area and volume by age classes (stand selection), 95 by area and volume allotment, 93 by area-volume allotment, 93 by stem space, 88 by volume-allotment, 93 by volume-diameter classes, 88 by volume-growing stock, 75 by volume-growing stock-size classes, 82 by volume-growing stock-increment, 79, 80 distinction between formulae, 79 by volume-increment, 78 by volume-single trees, 86 classification, 71, 72, 74 compared, I61 formulae omitted, 72 in European countries, Alsace-Lorraine, 196 Austria, 108 Baden, 188 214 Bavaria, 181 France, 200 Grand Duchy of Hesse, 191 Grand Duchy of Saxony, 193 Kingdom of Saxony, 183 Prussia, 178 Wiirtemberg, 187 on National Forests (1921), 210 summary, 74 Devastation of forests (see also overcut- ting), 2, 9, I2-I4, 142 Diameter-class method, determination of cut by (see Hufnagl) Diameter limit, determination of cut by (see Pinchot-Graves), 88 District (see adm. subdivision), defined and discussed, 26 ranger, 26 patrol, 26 District, forester, 26 block (see block) Divisions (see also subdivisions), 20 compartment (see compartment) in Alsace-Lorraine, 194 in Austria, 196 in Baden, 188 in Bavaria, 180 in France, 200 in Grand Duchy of Hesse, 190 in Grand Duchy of Saxony, 192 in Kingdom of Saxony, 182 in Prussia, 176 . in Wurtemberg, 185 lot (see lot) subcompartment (see lot) working circle (see working circle) working group (see working group) Dixon, 206 Douglas fir, 37, 50, 211 Eastern Lassen working circle, 210 Eastern mixed hardwoods, 166, 168 Economic rotation (see rotation) Eldredge, 69, 206 Empirical yield tables, 148 Endres, M., preface, 28, 33, 35, 40, 4I, 52, 200 Estimates (see timber estimates ) Even-aged forests, III European timber market, 203 Expectancy value, 44 Felling age (see rotation), 28 Felling reserve, 131 Felling budget (see cutting plan) Felling series (see syn. cutting series), 97, 183 B. E. (author of Introductory Note), 6, 14, 58, 175 Figures, list of in text, Financial rotations (see rotation) Fisher, W. R., 1 Fixed area, determination of cut by, 90 illustration of, 91 summary, 90 Flury, 65 Foley, John, 6 Forest (see adm. subdivisions), defined and discussed, 26 Forests, even-aged, III many-aged, III ultimate form, 113 Fernow, American Forest Regulation Forest description and survey, in Alsace-Lorraine, 195 in Austria, 107 in Baden, 188 in Bavaria, 181 in France, 200 in Grand Duchy of Hesse, 190 in Grand Duchy of Saxony, 193 in Kingdom of Saxony, 183 in Prussia, 177 in Wirtemberg, 186 Forest devastation (see devastation) Forest economics, defined, 1 Forest economy, defined, 1 Forest finance, defined, 1 Forest management, defined, 1 in Alsace-Lorraine, 194 in Austria, 196 in Baden, 188 in Bavaria, 180 in France, 200 in Grand Duchy of Hesse, 189 in Grand Duchy of Saxony, 192 in Kingdom of Saxony, 182 in Prussia, 175 in Wiirtemberg, 185 Forest mensuration, defined, 1 Forest organization (see regulation) Forest organizer (see working plans officer in appendix A (a).) Forest regulation (syn. forest organization. See regulation) Forest rent (see financial rotations) Forest Service, 6, 205, 210 Forest surveys (see description and surveys) Formula methods (see determination of cut) French method of 1883, determination of cut by, 82, 143 discussion, 82 illustration, 85 summary, 84 Frothingham, E. H., 34, 36, 46, 62 Goal of private owners, 107 of public management, 108 Gazin, stem space method (see also crown spread), 88 Graves, Henry S., 5, 37, 126 Grazing, I2 Grebanare, forest of, 203 Grebe, 193 Greeley, W. B., 12, 16 - Group selection forests, 160 Growth on cut over lands, 109 balances decadence, 127 on virgin forests, 110 Growing stock, actual (see Austrian method, etc:) normal (see normal growing stock) Growth percent, 131 Guise, C..H., 73 Gurnaud, 78 Hansen, T. S., Preface Hanzlik, E. J., Preface, 51, 211 Hapham, E. E., 16 HartionG. Linzi Harvard forest, 7, 97, 204 Hawley, R. C., 7, 37 Hess, 206 Heyer’s Method, determination of cut by, Introductory Note, 73, 82 Index application to America (see Introductory Note) is RL. ty 12 Horizontal cut, 114, 115, 117, 119 computing cut by, 119 Hopping, 206 ‘ Huinagl’s method of determining cut, 73, 82, 101, 211 Huffel, 3, 15, 88 Hundeshagen’s method, determination of cut by, 72, 79 Hutton, G. W., 16 Increment, current annual, 131, 140 determination of (see yield tables) determination of cut by, 78 in quality percent, 198 mean annual, 149 normal, 58 price, 203 quality, 198, 203 volume (see determination of cut, by volume) Index, per cent, 198 Indian single tree method, determination of cut by, 86 illustration, 87 summary, 87 Introductory Note (by Fernow), 15 Introduction, Chapter 1, i Inyo, management policy stated, 205 Jones, T. J., 208 Journal, for records, in Austria, 199 Judeich, 3 Karl’s method, determination of cut by, 79 conditions in Alsace-Lorraine, 204 Kirkland, B. P., 14, 15 Kissen, Grand Duchy of, 202 Klein, market, 204 _ Koch, E., Preface Korstian, C. F., 31, 32, 43 Kraft, 201, 203 Land classification, 4 Land policy, 11 Ledger, in Prussia, 179 Limitation of annual cut on National For- ests (by Secretary), 7 Loblolly pine, 47 Lodgepole pine, 36, 65, 135, 170 Logging unit (see block) Long, W. H., 33 Loss of numbers, 141 Lot (syn. subcompartment), defined, 24 ' discussed, 25 Lumbering, effect of on management, 12 plan (see working plan) subdivision, 20 Management plans (see working plan), 210 Manual, Forest Service, 7 Many-aged forests, III, 137 Maps and tables (see tables) Margolin, L., 204 Markets, influence of on sustained yield, 12 Market unit (see working circle) Martin, H., Preface, 3, 201 Mason, D. T., 36, 65, 170 Masson, formula, determination of cut by, 72, 75 Mattoon, W. R., 37, 50 Mean annual increment (see increment), 149 215 Meinecke, E. P., 33 Method of 1883, determination of cut by (see French method), 82, 143 Méthode du contréle, determination of cut by (see Gurnaud) Minimum exploitable age, effect of mature surplus on, 116 Missoula, 210 Moore, Barrington, 5, 17, 71, 86 Munger, T. T., Preface, 35, 64 National forest manual (see Manual) National forests, 26 Net income, in Baden, 189 N. H. Forestry Commission, 46, 204 New Haven Water Co. tract, 7, 37 Normal age class distribution, 56 Normal forest, defined, 56 abnormality, 56 age classes in, 57 artificial and natural factors, 57 determination of, 141 discussed, 56 Flury’s formula, 65 formulae, 59, 62 illustrations, 62 importance of, 66 lodgepole pine calculation, 65 Munger formula, 64 relation of growth to cut in, 120 transitional cutting cycle in, 112 Normal growing stock, 58, 66 Normal increment, 58 Norway pine, 37 Oak, 34 Ogden, 210 Olmstead, F. E., 6 Organization (see regulation) Overcutting, (see also devastation), 142 Period methods, determination of cut by area-period, 91 area-volume period, 93 in Alsace-Lorraine, 195 in Baden, 188 in Bavaria, 181 in France, 200 in Grand Duchy of Hesse, tor in Grand Duchy of Saxony, 1093 in Kingdom of Saxony, 182 in Prussia, 175 in Wurtemberg, 185 volume-period, 93 Period of financial cutting, 203 Periodic plan (see working plans), 5 Pinchot, 88, 126 Pisgah National Forest, 7, 116 Pilz 53 Planting plans (see appendix A (a)) Policy statements, for National Forests, 7, 205, 210 Portland, 211 Potter, A. F., 12 Preface, 5 Preliminary plans in United States, 7, 205, 210 Pressler’s formula, use of in Austria, 198 Price Increment, 198 Production, curtailment of, 10 continuous, II Prussia, practice of working plans in, 175 Public ownership, 13 216 Public lands com., 11 Purchase of timber, 115 Quantitative rotation (see rotations) Quiz, 7, 18, 26, 38, 54, 66, 80, 103, 122, 146, 164, 174 Rate of interest, 44 Recknagel, references to works of, 21, 33, 53, 54, 65, 73, 78, 80 Reduction per cent, 135 Regulation (syn. organization) (see also determination of cut), I American method of, 143 area methods, 90 background, 9 basic conditions, 9 basic studies, 10 classification, 71, 72 compromises necessary, 70 conception in Europe, 3 control of in Europe (see working plans) coordination with silvics, 170 correlation, 169 defined and explained, I even-aged stands, 166 formulae omitted, 72 goal, 108 influences determining initial cut, 108 obstacles, 106 of cork oak, 90 of cut, defined, 68, 71 of basic policy, 68 of selection forests, 139 of thinnings, etc., 74, 187, 192 of transition forests, 126 of turpentine forests, 90 of woodlots, 90 on private property, 7 policy re ownership, 107 preliminary requirements, 105 relation between increment and growing stock, 70 scope of, 4 summary of principles, 123, 133, 173 volume methods, 74 with clear cutting, 103 with selection cutting, 103 Research, need of, 10 Residual growing stock (and felling re- serve), II2 Rotations defined, 28 and cutting cycles, 113 basic policy, 30 economic (or quantitative) rotations, de- fined and discussed, 34 choice of, 35 illustrations, 35 final choice of, 51 financial rotations, defined, 39 forest rent, defined, 39 distinguished from soil rent, 41 soil rent, defined, 39, 200 discussed, 43 distinguished from forest rent, 41 illustrations, 46 influence of final yield, 45 rate of interest in, 45 justify working groups, 23 kinds of, 30 length discussed, 29 mean for stands, 30 American Forest Regulation silvicultural, defined and discussed, 32 illustrations, 33 statistics, 35, 40, 41 technical rotations, defined and discussed, 31 illustrations, 31 summary, 52 Roth, F., references to works of, 3, 10, 21, 807 45).53, 77, 79 Sale policy, 7, 205, 210 Savoie, results of working plans in, 208 Schaffer, 77, 82, 208 San Francisco, 210 Schiffel, G. A., 54 Schlich, W., Preface, 21, 32, 43, 52, 60, 64, 77, 86, 91 Schmidt, 202 Schuberg, 35 Schultz, 202 Schwappach, A., 35 Secretary of Agriculture, 7 Selection forests, regulation of, 139 Shortleaf pine, 37 Silvicultural system, 22 Silvicultural rotation (see rotations) Soil rent (see financial rotations), 200 Stand selection method, determination of cut by, definition, 95 compared with allotment methods, 100 illustration, 95 table, 153 summary, 95 Statistics financial, 202, 203 in Austria, 200 in Baden, 188 in France, 200 in Kingdom of Saxony, 184 in Wurtemberg, 187 rotations, 35 Sterrett, W. F., 48 Stock table (see tables) Stock taking, 6 Stoetzer, 3 Subcompartment (see lot) Subdivisions of a forest (see also adm. sub- division and management subdivi- .sion), 20 definition of, 20 size, 20 Survey of area (see description and survey) Sustained yield, application of, 15 defined, 14 difficulties, 17, 106 financial aspect of,.15 French conditions compared, 15 limitations in practice, 17, 18 objective, 17 on public forests, 16 ultimate problem, 147-165 Swiss method (see Gurnaud), 72, 78 Symbols used, 13 Tables (examples of in working plans) in Austria, 197 ; in Grand Duchy of Hesse, 190 in Grand Duchy of Saxony, 193 in France, 200 in Wiirtemberg, 186 list of, in text, 14 Technical rotation (see rotations) Index Terminology Committee, Preface, 25 Thinnings, regulated by area, 74, 187, 192 Timber estimates (see also description and survey), 6 cost of, 210 Toumey, J. W., dedication, 13 Transitional forest regulation (see Part IT) Turpentine forest, regulation of, 90 Tusayan, regulation of, 136 Unit of regulation (see working circle) Use per cent (see Hundeshagen) Use of forest land (see land classification) Values, definition of kinds of, 39, 40 Value increment (see increment) Vanderbilt property, 7, 116 Virgin forests, 110 Volume increment (see increment) Von Guttenberg, 3 Von Mantel’s method, determination of cut by, 75, 128, 150, 211 correction factor, 76 illustration, 77 summary, 77 Walter, 203 Washington, D. C., 211 Watson, R., 10, 11 Weber, 43 Western hemlock, 46 Western white pine, 36 Western yellow pine, 31, 118, 128, 129, 148, 154, 210 White fir, 33 White pine, 46, 49, 50 immennaur, 202 Wolff, M. H., Preface, 24, 212 Wood-lots, regulation of, 90 Woodruff, G. W., 12 Woolsey, T. S., Jr., references to works of, 17, 26, 28, 20, 31, 32, 37, 90, 93, 156, 200 Working circle, 20, 21, 22, 23 Working figure (see working circle) Working group, 20, 21, 22 Working period (see allotment) 217 Working plans, defined, 5 conferences, 175, 181, 188 control and revision of in Alsace-Lorraine, 196 in Austria, 199, 200 in Baden, 188 in Bavaria, 182 in France, 200 in Grand Duchy of Hesse, 192 in Grand Duchy of Saxony, 194 in Kingdom of Saxony, 185 in Prussia, 179 in Wirtemberg, 187 documents (see Chamonix) foundations of, 9, etc. national forest plans, 210 outlines for (see France), 200 practice and policy of in Alsace-Lorraine, 194 in Austria, 196 in Baden, 188 in Bavaria, 180 in France, 200 in Grand Duchy of Hesse, 189 in Grand Duchy of Saxony, 192 in Kingdom of Saxony, 182 in Prussia, 175 in United States Forest Service, 5, 205, 210 in Wirtemberg, 185 progress of, 5 results of, in Savoie, 208 uses of forest land (see land classification) Working plan manual (see manual) Working plan unit (see working circle) Working section (see working group) Working unit (see working circle) Yellow poplar, 138 Yield, prediction of, 159 Yield tables, use of in regulation, 92, 137, 148, 152 Yale, 7 Zon, RS 73.33 J > — ¥ yee I : | Ronich vitila iN Taare isthiinon e 1 ie WEP CO Seal sel ies ay Ae | toy ~ hal cluuet 5 kent drei In patel eee Woe fees bg nena tall OT Mei Mop nae o ital #) fi Oe ad dete Ap OV Jer ites “) Gell op @)) APiiaditiet WA Nee , pie ctieVod at Ue Psa) nica fea ES ! eat ten | a : “ei wil hela aa! hie vy wwe Gili) Abe 7 J ain ane ber Yooowaer wheel Taped ant : cra pir ko yi | aie ale ‘4 “ia ive” r] apf ig own » fis fit ea wh§ 1 OLY Dirt si a chuthaetd jaa)! (ee ¢ Salen! a a Bh tle io, oo fa. > onile yse Vdwireal (ising teh 9°90 if ide Hiei t i Sivan ' dy Yh vie A * ottely We ae jay vat? Wir o ho 5 / vil og) aT; } | ny vero gti, OSA} Thain at ot om er - 19 -9aned la easy Spel UNOS O (gtide ay) Bi! ff Nig Mp ccolgnisjob bart aa ae een as Hic 0 ga aa . ae, “ Eu fm teh 7) pla on “ rks na jel . my Ser! al “tb vim ane = eae, o ej . & v 7. Tool rdit ag : ; : WE iby SIE Tae MEN I eal i Rep yer Kot “11 (1s ond Wolly j Ul bay Ae. ces pare i: hres c =f al sidve Fen tin ieee ria) Alsat om op. OL Soe Ct) Swit hihi ime ThipOns ' ey Sore fslutiy sbi 4 CMe Gee ie hike cio 26 wlan JT Ete There Gites pe) ce Diiye bby f eet (¢ to) Sloe «ie Co; ote! oir Vow ie oi 0) Jie Nt Re fe Del’ coed GG So adel Ly ee : a Nie a

Le? : au § ‘< : = A , ve ie tis : ‘ a. J ss f e : : N ie ) ‘ * ” ® oT i uP Ela 1 ¢ 4 W | . ‘ Te le") o én : i ay wait ox Jae soe WI) A an ee, > ae SP d : 1 > be ‘s 5 \ i lee ee Ue pig ie i ; i ; i) P Pyar. aes ne P\] <4 a , tit, a ee - 7 - 2 ¥ iu d i > LIBRARY OF CONGRESS TIT OO000e898014?