RETURN TO LIBRARY OF MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATO WOODS HOLE, MASS. LOANED BY AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY The Annals OF Scottish Natural History A QUARTERLY MAGAZINE WITH WHICH IS INCORPORATED “Che Scottish Naturalist” EDITED BY J. A. HARVIE-BROWN F-.R.S.E., F.Z.S. MEMBER OF THE BRITISH ORNITHOLOGISTS’ UNION TAMES: Ws i TRAIL, MAS. MD.” BUR-S:, FES: PROFESSOR OF BOTANY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN AND WILLIAM EAGLE CLARKE, F.L.S., F.R.S.E.- KEEPER OF THE NATURAL HISTORY DEPARTMENT, ROYAL SCOTTISH MUSEUM, EDINBURGH 1907 EDINBURGH DAVID DOUGLAS, CASTLE STREET LONDON: R. H. PORTER, 7 PRINCES ST., CAVENDISH SQUARE The Annals of Scottish Natural History No: 62] LS: O07 [JANUARY WANTED—THE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY OF SCOTEAND: By Jamess Ws) H. TRart, MEAS MODS ERS: THE time is long past since it was possible for any one to claim that he took all knowledge for his province; and societies, like individuals, have had to restrict their scope to ever-narrowing fields as knowledge has grown and deepened. Some have applied themselves to the investigation of a single science or portion of a science; while others, with wider range of subjects, have limited their action within a definite, it may be a relatively small geographical area. More and more has it become evident that concentration in a definite field is a condition necessary to the production of work of permanent value, and that for all but a gifted few that field must not be wide. But while the subdivision of labour is necessary, and has brought with it very great increase in knowledge in almost every field of study, it has also brought very serious loss and danger. The many workers toil on within their narrowing limitations ; and however precious the ore they seek, they tend to shut themselves off from the wider vision 61 B 2 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY and to lose knowledge of and sympathy with the work of others, and the sense of proportion that should make their own work sane and true. Even within the narrow limits of the special study the work fails, crushed under the accumula- tions of materials that will not be fitted into a coherent scheme, or defective through the difficulty of ascertaining what has been already published on the same _ subject. There have been, and there are, numerous societies in Scotland whose object has been to add to what was already known of the natural history of the country ; and outside the work of the societies there have been issued numerous books and papers in journals, forming a mass of information of large amount and of much worth, if only it could be made readily accessible. But much of it is buried almost beyond reach, and a relatively small part alone can be made full use of. The influence of this literature as a whole on the study of the natural history of Scotland is hurtful rather than helpful while it cannot be properly utilised, as the vague knowledge of its existence tends to disguise how very much remains to be done, and the effort to search out the records consumes much time that can ill be spared. The societies that existed in Scotland a century ago included inquiries into the natural history only as a part of their proceedings; yet the small number of publications issued in any form made it comparatively easy to follow all that was being done. But for many years it has been almost impossible to ascertain all that has been issued. Many societies have been formed, most of them strictly limited in their scope, either to certain counties or districts, or to certain subjects. Among the most successful are those that restrict their publications strictly within the limits in- dicated by their names ; and numerous valuable contributions have been issued by these societies. But for the most part these publications are issued only to the members of each society, or in exchange with other societies, and this makes it almost impossible for a worker to have access to some of these publications. When we turn to the papers issued in journals the practical difficulty is hardly less; for we find them scattered through numerous publications, each usually WANTED—THE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND 3 limited to one science, or even to a much narrower field ; and no one can hope to keep account of these papers by one’s own watchfulness. Still more difficult is it not to overlook what appears in separate form, or in local works, guidebooks, travels, sometimes in foreign languages, and in ways that are very apt to escape notice. As the years pass, many contributions, while still of great value, become forgotten, especially if issued in a local publication. Their subjects are investigated again, under the supposition that they have not been previously approached, and much labour is wasted that might have been saved had the earlier work not been forgotten ; or after completion of the work anew the earlier paper is found, and the second proves to have been needless, and is thereupon withdrawn. Every worker knows how large a part of the time that should be available for extending knowledge is spent in seeking to find out what had already been published on the subject under investigation, and must have longed for an accurate and full subject-index to the field of investigation. This heavy burden on scientific work grows more exigent year by year, and threatens to preclude advance, if the inquiry must be made anew by each indi- vidual. There is urgent need to free research from such burdens as far as that is possible. If relief is not given by efficient indexing research will build itself into its own tomb; and its very earnestness and productiveness will only cause it to be crushed by its own products the more speedily. It may be thought that to advocate the formation of another natural history society is only to add to the burdens already so oppressive. That might be so if it were on the lines of those already existing; but the society of which there is need should not be on these lines. Its aims should be to supplement and strengthen the work of all societies and individuals that seek in any way to extend what is known of the natural history of Scotland; in no way to diminish or to interfere with their usefulness or freedom, but to aid them by bringing within the reach of all a knowledge of what has been gained in the past and is being done at the present time; to show what is known and what gaps 4 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY exist ; and thus to suggest where labour can be most usefully and profitably applied to extend what is known, within the limits of place and time in which each works. Scotland is exceedingly well defined as a natural area for investigation, since even its southern frontier, by which alone it is in contact with any other land-surface, is clearly marked throughout most of its length by the Cheviot hills. Its surface is much diversified; and the numerous islands along its west and north coasts offer problems of an interest- ing and important kind in their relation to the origins of fauna and flora, and to the evolution of new types by isola- tion. But while these conditions appear so favourable to the pursuance of a systematic investigation of the natural history of the country as a whole, no organisation has been formed with that aim—a strange and unfavourable contrast to what exists in various parts of continental Europe, often where only political instead of natural limits mark out the countries. Finland, Switzerland, Bavaria, and Branden- burg afford examples of admirable work of the kind in question. It is more than time that steps were taken to provide for a careful and thorough investigation of the natural history of Scotland as a whole, to take up work of a kind that no existing society attempts to discharge, and to supplement the individualism of the workers, and even of the numerous societies, by the common efforts of all to the same end, by means that shall make the work of each known to all to whom it can be helpful. Such an aim can be fulfilled only by co-operation. There is much need for the formation of a new society whose one end should be the investigation of the natural history of Scotland. That “Natural history” should be interpreted in the old, wide sense, to include all that falls under physiography and geology, as well as zoology and botany. Anthropology should not be excluded, although, for the sake of convenience, it would be represented probably by physical and prehistoric aspects rather than by its other sides. Geology has already been the care of the Geological Survey ; the Ordnance Survey has given excellent maps of the present configuration of the country ; and the WANTED—THE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND 5 climate is the object of continued observation and records by the meteorologists. In so far as all these have national support for their study, there is less need to make other provision for them; yet even in these there are side issues that call for inquiry; and there is room for extension of the information acquired into forms that would bring it more directly before those likely to be interested in such things. It is, however, in the sciences of botany, zoology, and anthropology that the want of co-operation and co-ordina- tion is most evident and the urgent need of action is most felt. Much has been done in the study of the flora and fauna, and, especially in recent years, of the origin of the human population of Scotland; but that work has been done in an isolated way by individual workers or by local societies. It has rarely been done with reference to the whole country, or as part of a general scheme. Much of what has been done has been made known only to members of the local society, or at least to few others; and in a short time much excellent work is forgotten, buried in publications that can scarcely be procured or seen even for reference. What has been put on record is most difficult of access, and much of it has appeared under conditions that tend to its being overlooked or out of reach of many to whom it would be of great value. Some parts of the work have been repeated needlessly, while very much remains untouched or nearly so; and there is at present no means of readily learning what has been done, and what awaits investigation. The need of a guide is urgent; but the guide must be one accepted as authoritative, not apt to be overlooked or forgotten, and readily accessible to all whenever required. The preparation of such a guide and its publication would be of great and immediate service; but the labour is too great to be accomplished except by co-operation. There is great need to supplement and extend the more or less isolated efforts of the past by a definite scheme or survey in which these efforts should have their due recogni- tion and be preserved from loss. But such a survey should be extended to the whole of Scotland and its islands, and 6 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY should indicate what has been already accomplished, suggest researches that should be undertaken, and advise as to methods and sources of information, where such advice would be likely to attract or be useful to new workers or to aid those already in the field. There is no likelihood that a Biological survey of Scotland will be placed on a similar basis with the Geological survey as a national undertaking. It must depend on the voluntary support of such as think that the survey should be made, and that what extends our know- ledge of our country ought to be made known. A survey of the natural history of a country to be efficient must, like other surveys, be the working out of a co-ordinated scheme, prepared after due consideration, and with full knowledge of the scope of the work and of the means available. The researches that have been made on the natural history of Scotland have for the most part related to some limited district, or to the distribution of some group (vascular plants, mosses and liverworts, fungi, seaweeds, and desmids among plants, and lepidoptera, beetles, etc, among animals) throughout the country. No general scheme for such a survey has ever been prepared. Indeed, there has been no organisation with authority to do so, since each society’s efforts have been rightly directed to its own field, and each individual’s to one or to a few groups. But the time is more than come for the preparation of a scheme fora survey of the whole natural history of Scotland, in which existing societies and individuals will find the true place for their work and inspiration and assistance for more strenuous efforts. In a well-devised scheme no existing organisation or research should be interfered with or dis- couraged. The new should supplement and not supersede the old. No existing organisation can with advantage undertake a national survey of the kind required. That will require a new society, formed for the promotion of whatever will advance that aim—-THE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND in the fullest sense of the name. The work to be done by such a society, and the relations between it and those at present existing have been already WANTED—THE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND 7 referred to, but a more definite and systematised statement with regard to them and to the organisation and means that may be employed may not be out of place. Aims of the Society—To carry out a full survey of the Natural History of Scotland in the widest sense, in so far as not already provided for (e.g. by the Geological and Ordnance Surveys), and to promote all that tends towards that end, especially by co-ordinating and rendering more accessible all information that bears on it. Relations to other Socteties with similar aims and to individual research—Mutually helpful, supplementing and in no way interfering with or superseding each other. Work of the Soctety—(1) To procure and publish guides to all the information contained in published books and journals, such guides to contain lists of the various items classified by subjects, by localities, and by authors, with a brief indication of the contents and where each paper may be found; (2) To issue for each year a classified index of new papers relating to the natural history of Scotland, whether contained in the publications of the various local societies, of societies outside Scotland, in journals or in books touching on or devoted to any part of the society’s field of work; thus a far wider circulation would be secured from the first for all information of real value; it would be more widely helpful, and would be less likely to be forgotten after- wards ; (3) To include with this index short statements of published researches elsewhere that throw light on the natural history of Scotland, and that may suggest lines of inquiry that should be followed up in this country, or that suggest or describe new methods of study that might be usefully applied here ; (4) To prepare and issue a reasoned scheme of in- vestigation for the whole of Scotland, indicating what has been or is being accomplished, and what most evidently awaits investigation as regards either districts or subjects, and to secure advice for those seeking it on any matter, especially by the appointment of referees willing to name specimens submitted to them ; (5) To assist in the preparation and issue of monographs on such divisions of the whole scheme as might be judged ready for publication, whether these be large or small parts of the whole; (6) To assist in 8 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY the preparation and issue of maps or of other means by which distribution in Scotland of animals, plants, minerals, etc., may be graphically and effectively shown, and their past history in the country and their relations to man traced. While these are some of the more important lines of work that should be undertaken by the society, its usefulness will certainly extend in other ‘directions also. Meetings for the reading of papers should not be included in its sphere of activity, its function being to supply in- formation in print, but not to provide opportunities for verbal discussion. Constitution of the Society—A large membership is very desirable, to permit of a considerable circulation of the reports and other publications at a relatively low expense, and also to supply a larger number of active workers in various departments. The organisation of the work should be en- trusted to a committee elected by the society. The work of the secretary would probably be sufficient after a time to require the services of a skilled paid official, who should be responsible for the preparation of the annual reports of current literature, and for the issue of all other publications, under the directions of the committee. Voluntary assistance should be of great use towards the preparation of the much- needed subject-index to past literature. Those engaged in any special research have usually to prepare such an index for personal use in the special field, and could give valuable aid by contributing the index in each case; but to carry through the formation of the index as a whole the past literature should be searched systematically. Large aid could be given towards this if a list of periodicals and other literature in want of examination were prepared and circu- lated, with a request for volunteers to look through such of the work as they could conveniently undertake to prepare separate slips of the various articles or notices in—such slips to be sent to the secretary, who should classify the information supplied in them according to the scheme approved by the committee. It would make information obtained in this way more useful if the slips were of uniform size and design, to be obtained from the secretary by any one signifying the willingness and intention to examine and WANTED—THE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND 9 send in the slips for a given part of the literature. The preparation of monographs suitable for publication on any part of the field must be done by those whose study the sroups have been; but the co-operation of specialists may be relied upon for this part of the work. To permit of the issue of such monographs, with the requisite maps, of the index to the past literature and of the annual reports, and possibly of a journal on a fairly adequate scale, will require financial support from a pretty large number of members, if, as is much to be desired, the sub- scription be not more than ten shillings a year; for it is much to be wished that the help afforded by such publications should reach all to whom it would be of service, many of whom could not afford to pay a large subscription. But if developed, as the work of the society should be, into a national survey, there is reason to hope that it would commend itself to those who could and would give it financial support that would permit of its being carried on with success. In conclusion, may I ask that the question of organising such a survey be considered, neither overlooking nor exaggerating the difficulties and labour involved. The need of some such organisation has been keenly felt by the Editors of this magazine, and also doubtless by many others, who may have been deterred by the apparent greatness of the task. Co-operation and co-ordination of the efforts already employed would make a successful commencement of the work possible without delay. Discussion will be welcomed, whether of details towards carrying out the scheme, or of obstacles that would oppose it, for it is well to know the difficulties to be overcome. It would be helpful if those that approve generally of the proposals would indicate their approval through this journal or to myself. UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN. fe) ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY WHALING IN SCOTLAND. By R. C. Haupang, F.S.A. (Scot.). PLATE I. THE season of 1906 has been a productive one and presents features of great interest. The results have been— Bs B. B. B. musculus. sibbaldit. borealis. Megaptera. Sperm. biscayensts. Norrona Co. 40 fits 37 Shetland Co. 31 Te 16 Alexandra Co. 49 ae qe a Olna Co. 178 I may 3 at Buneveneader Co. 19 53 64 2 I 6 317 54 326 5 I 6 and one Bottle-nose whale (Ayferoodon) brought in at Olna. The large number of B&B. dorealzs killed this year is very remarkable, also the six Right Atlantic Whales, Balena biscayensis. BALHNOPTERA SIBBALDII (Blue Whale). The particulars of these whales are given below :— No. of Bulls. Average Length. No. of Cows. Average Length. ft.) 10S: ft. sins? Buneveneader . 35 (fc 18 2s Olna. ; : I O21 Last year, 1905, Buneveneader had 18 FOrn2 ne L2G This year there were bulls of 82, 80, 79, 76, and 73 feet, and cows of 83, 82, 78, 78, 76, 76, and 74 feet long. The Shetland whales of this species never seem to be large. Hyjort gives the length of these whales as ‘‘up to 85 feet.” The migration of these whales seems to be about longitude 10° W., passing between Iceland and Faroe and then spreading East and West. They are fairly abundant west of St. Kilda, but rare in Shetland waters. On roth July one of these Blue Whales had a foetus 22 feet long, ‘‘ but the latter was not full grown yet.” On rst August another was got 18 feet long not developed enough for birth. These two cases show how large the young Blue Whales are at birth. . WHALING IN SCOTLAND Ik BALENOPTERA MUSCULUS. l | Number | ,. | Number A Proportion | Proportion STATION. of Bulls a = ae | of Cows in ag of Bulls | of Cows killed. Sper) es ikalleds engi. | per cent. | per cent. (eitep ins) ft. ins. Norrona . ; : 20 ng “0 | “ze 61 5 50.0 50.0 Shetland ‘ : 18 Se Ge 58 7 58.0 42.0 Alexandra. : 21 Go} 19) 25 6r 8 42.8 Gyiail Ola: : OA 5a 7a || On ish it 47.1 52.8 Buneveneader : LOM SON OU |, ale Ho i 47-3 52.6 i530 55°. 6 | 167 59 2 | 49.1 50.9 For comparison I add the table from my paper in the July “Annals.” | | Norrona. Shar 2 Oi 3) Bi 61 9 57-5 42.4 Shetland : 5 2 62 6 24 Os ii 50.0 50.0 Alexandra. . : 56 GO @ | gy 64 7 64.3 35-6 Olnay yy: , é gI Ger Be | ig 58 4 49.3 50.6 Buneveneader : 45 GON 55 aeesS 60 2 57-6 42.3 248 60 5 | 202 62 0 Spy Aare | The first thing to notice is that these whales are much fewer than last year, their size smaller, and cows are more numerous than bulls. The reason of the first is from the invasion of 2. borealis, which comes nearer land than the Finner, and the latter will not associate with the former. Occasionally a small Finner will be found near them, but the adult Finner keeps away from LB. borealis. One captain of a whaler told me there was a regular belt of water (in which there were plenty of herrings) between the two whales. The 4. borealis left about 18th July, and then Finners came _ back. I attribute the smaller size to differences in the measurement. Hjort gives the size of B. musculus as “ 60-65 feet, seldom over 70 feet.” Why the proportion of the sexes has changed I can only say that I do not know. In 1904 there were, out of 226 Finner whales, 60 per cent of bulls and 4o per cent of cows. It is not that whales are getting fewer, for the captain of a steamer coming from Iceland told me that for some 40 miles between Iceland and Faroe he passed thousands of Finner whales; he said they were blowing all round the ship as far as he could see. Whaling was just about over at the time. I tried to get the proportion of the sexes from foetuses. Out of 19, 11 were bulls and 8 cows, or about 58 bulls per cent, but the number is too small for much use. I counted the baleen plates in a large Finner 71 feet long. I took the right side to show the difference in colour. The first anterior 170 plates were yellow, and the 207 posterior plates were grey; total, 377 plates. The number of plates varies with the individual whale. 12 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY The farther north these, or any other, whales are killed, the thicker is the blubber. ‘The last season, 1906, was cold and inclement, and it seemed to me that the blubber was thicker than formerly. At Norrona station one Finner had herrings inside, and at the Alexandra station ten had fed on herrings. ‘The latter part of July is the time when these whales first begin to eat herrings ; in August they are more frequently found with herrings. BAL#NOPTERA BOREALIS (Seihval). Plate I. I have just stated that these whales came in vast numbers this year. In 1904 the four Shetland stations had only five of these whales. In 1905 the number went up to thirty-two, of which the Olna station had twenty-seven and the Alexandra none. 1906 showed the extraordinary number of 262. It was not only off the Shetland coast where they were, but off Harris they seemed just as plentiful. Once off the coast of Finmark there was a similar invasion, when Finner whales kept away; the following year they were gone. ‘To those who are interested in the migration of fish and other denizens of the sea this will be noteworthy. ‘These whales feed on much the same food as B. szbbaldii and do not eat fish. Hjort gives the length as from 4o to 50 feet. I counted 290 plates of baleen in one individual. The particulars of these whales given below may be of interest :— Numb Numb P tion |P. ti STATION. of Bulls | Average | oF Cows | Average | or'Bulls |. of Cows: killed. pe killed. enstis | per cent. | per cent. ft. ins.| ft. ins Norrona . : ‘ 22 39 (8 15 BON 62) 5955 40.5 Shetland : : 7 43 4 9 AGO} |e A357, 56.3 Alexandra. ; 25 41 Oo 47 Aig Tp) Yo 7/ 65-3 Olna . : : 76 42 6 61 42 O}] 55-4 44.5 Buneveneader ‘ 43 ~=—*|36-48 25 + |36-48 63.2 36.8 173 AE G7 a esa 42 2} 51.3 48.7 In the above average lengths I have not included the return from Buneveneader station. A note from the manager says: “ From 13th June to 6th of July 62 Seihval-were killed near St. Kilda; 22 of these were female, but no foetus ; dimensions, 36 to 48 feet and from 14-20 (girth), A storm came and brought them away (6th July), so none were to be seen on the fishing grounds after that.” The last paragraph is very interesting; the whales, curious, changeful creatures, went off on account of a storm. In Shetland we had fine weather at the time and they stayed on for another twelve days and left us on the 18th July. We had a storm on the 19th, few were seen after that. I particularly wanted a small foetus ANN, Scom Nam Eiism 1907, Prare |. BALA4ZNOPTERA BOREALIS: DORSAL ASPECT. BALENOPTERA BOREALIS: VENTRAL ASPECT, Whaling in Scotland.—P. 12 é a * 3 t > a j \ i? aaieal s 2 is = ’ ' ' ; ‘ ae e F « ‘ P .- ' ro WHALING IN SCOTLAND 13 of B. borealis for the University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge, but during the month they were near us the foetuses were all too large. In this they seem different from 2. musculus, the foetuses of which vary greatly in size. The baleen of the Seihval is fringed with soft silky hair of a dirty white colour. It is valuable, the present market price being 475 to L100 a ton. That from B. musculus being £27: 108. The smaller size of the Seihval makes it less valuable than the Finner, probably two Seihvals are equal in value to one Finner. In one thing it is superior: the beef is excellent, like veal, and cooked as veal cutlets one can hardly tell the difference, only the whale is richer. The same hairs occur on the jaws in both &. musculus and borealis. LB. borealis has a peculiar parasite attached to the stomach, I was told, but it may have been taken from the intestine near the stomach, small red and white objects like tiny sausages. These Dr. Harmer considers are Echinorhynchus turbinella, and there is also Lichinorhynchus porrigens, Rudolphi. One whale had received an injury to the snout, the end of which had been battered in, but had healed, leaving a concavity. In this were some barnacles, Conchoderma aurita; they were growing close to and among the coarse hairs which grow at the end of the upper jaw. The following are the lengths of the biggest of these whales killed, in feet :— Norrona Bulls 45, 45, 42, 42, Cows 47, 45, 45, 44 Shetland ,, 47, 46, 45, 44, » 47,47, 47, 46 Alexandra ,, 46, 47, 46, 44, » 48, 46, 46, 46 Olna »» 56, 50, 50, 50, » 57> 52, 52, 50 The last station got some whales of unusual length. BALENA BISCAYENSIS [| =. australis] The Buneveneader station was the only one to get any of the Atlantic Right whales. Four bulls and two cows. The length and then the girth is given— Bulls. 5 Sh Suge io AON fo 30.052! x36 Cows . =. KASiX Sys 2EG SO Hjort gives the length as up to 50 feet, and the whalebone from 5 to 7 feet. The whalebone of the above is given as from 2 to 8 feet in length, and is valuable. These whales are called Nordcaper in Norway. The only other specimen I have heard of was got in 1903 by a Faroe whaler 50 miles west of Shetland ; so far as I know no more have been got near Shetland than this one, unless the Faroe whalers have got any, for they often “ fish” in Shetland waters. 14 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY MEGAPTERA LONGIMANA (Humpback Knol) The Olna station got 2 bulls, 42 and 41 feet, and 1 cow of 43 feet. Buneveneader station, 2 bulls, both 32 feet, the girth of which is given as 20 and 21 feet. These whales live on shrimps and are of a very savage nature. They are by no means common. I have records of only seventeen having been killed in Shetland in four years. PHYSETER MACROCEPHALUS (Sperm Whale) The one got off the Flannen Islands by the Buneveneader Company was a large bull 68 feet long, the girth is given at 33 feet. I regret not having been informed as to the contents of the stomach, they are such omnivorous creatures. HyPEROODON DI0DON [= Z. vostratwm] (Bottle-nose) There are plenty of these whales round Shetland, but they are not fired at by the whalers on account of their small size. The one killed at Olna was a bull of 263 feet. Hjort gives the length at 20 to 25 feet. The oil is as valuable as sperm oil. In Norway this is a separate fishery conducted in sailing craft with small harpoons. A Norwegian gentleman suggests a reason for the grooves in the thorax of the Balenophore and Megaptera. In Norway they have grooves in the ski to give a better grip of the snow and to make them go faster. It is possible that these whales have grooves to enable them to travel faster through the water.! The herring fishermen and curers are making a great outcry about whaling ruining the herring fishing. It is difficult to reconcile this statement with the fact that the last three years have been the finest herring years on record :— LOGS & : : : é - 309,909 crans. I9g04 . : : . ‘ e543 2AOne L905: ; ; ; : OAS Oa Aare TOO. 2 , : : , (45 5,000mr ee 1 I suggested the same in different terms, viz. that these grooves are **sluices” to allow the resisting water to pass; and that if no such grooves existed on the under surfaces of the animals, the resistance to their progress, as bottom-feeders, would affect the quantities of their food, and prevent it reaching their mouths, the weight of water being diverted to either side; besides the great pressure also would affect the progress of the huge animals through the water. Perhaps additional probability may be lent to the theory here advanced by quite recent discoveries made in ship-building by Mr. William Peterson of Newcastle, which is thus described :—<‘ His design is for a groove of about 3 feet from edge to edge, and a foot in depth, to run from the bows alongside a ship. In this hollow, it is claimed, the spiral energy of the waves cast up when the bow cleaves the water, etc.,” causes increased speed with less coal or driving power. Has Mr, William Peterson thus taken the lesson from Nature ! ? JiR. WHALING IN SCOTLAND 15 It is true that the West Coast fishing was a failure this year, but this has happened long before whaling began, and is probably due to the cold for the first six months of this year. Government has been asked to stop whaling entirely, but as more than half the capital in the four whaling stations is British, this could not be done without paying compensation. Even if it were done, what would be the result? Whalers from Faroe would take the places of the existing whale steamers. Floating factories would anchor, and after flensing the carcases would let them drift. Affairs would be far worse than at present, and there would be no remedy without altering International law. LOcHEND, SHETLAND. ONT iE OCCURRENCE OF TRE SIBERIAN Gp RoCHAPE (PHVLLOSCORUS SLRESTES)) IN SCOTEAND: A NEW BIRD Ose BRITISH FAUNA. By Wm. EaGLe CiarKe, F.R,S.E., F.L.S. IN October 1902 I received from the Sule Skerry lighthouse, a lonely rock-station situated out in the Atlantic and some 33 miles west of Orkney, an example of a Phylloscopus, which had been captured at the lantern a short time previously, namely on the night of September 23. In order to preserve this specimen until such time as it was possible to despatch it to the mainland, the bird had been immersed in methylated spirit, and reached me in a sodden sstate. On examination I found that it was a Chiff-Chaff, but its condition did not then allow me to detect the differences between the European and Asiatic species. Fortunately, however, I had the specimen preserved, and having recently received a Chiff-Chaff from Fair Isle I was led to examine my lighthouse and other material relating to the genus. I then found that my old friend of 1902 was not the British and ordinary European species, but the bird known as the Siberian Chiff-Chaff, the Phylloscopus tristts of Blyth. This was an interesting discovery, for the species has not been detected in Western Europe, not even on that wonderful island, Heligo- land, which has furnished so many surprises for ornithologists 16 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY especially those who are interested in the phenomenon of bird migration. This new British bird is a summer visitor to North- eastern Europe, and finds its western limit in the valley of the River Petchora, where it was discovered by Messrs. Harvie- Brown and Seebohm during their notable investigations into the ornis of that little-known region. Eastwards, the last- named naturalist found it nesting in the valley of the Yenesei, and it also occurs in summer in the highlands of Kashmir. In winter it is widely distributed over India, being only absent from the southern portion of the peninsula. The only record known to me for Europe, beyond the Petchora and Eastern Russia, is one for the river Po in Italy, as mentioned by Eduardo in “ Avicula” (ii. 1-2) in 1898. In plumage Phylloscopus tristis resembles our Chiff-Chaff, P. rufus, but is browner above; has the under parts buff, paler on the chin, throat, and abdomen ; and the bill and legs darker, the latter being blackish brown. It differs also from the Common Chiff-Chaff in its song, which is loud but not musical. Its nest was found by Seebohm on the lower Yenesei. One which he describes was placed in the branches of an alder about 4 feet from the ground, and was semidomed, com- posed of grass, and lined with grouse feathers. The eggs are white, spotted with dark purple, and are large for the size of the bird. THE RoyaL SCOTTISH MUSEUM, EDINBURGH. NOTES ON THE BIRDS SEEN IN THE OUTER HEBRIDES DURING THE SPRING OF 1906. By Norman B. Kinnear, M.B.O.U. DURING last spring I spent some six weeks in the Outer Hebrides, starting at Barra and working north to Stornoway. For part of the time I was fortunate in having my friend Mr. P. H. Bahr for a companion, and my only regret is that he was not able to continue with me for the whole trip. The principal object of our visit was to see certain species NOTES ON BIRDS SEEN IN THE OUTER HEBRIDES 17 which had recently been reported in these pages as breeding in the Outer Hebrides, and at the same time to obtain some photographs of birds and their nests. We were exception- ally fortunate, and Bahr obtained some splendid photographs of old birds on their nests and with their young. To the different proprietors we wish to acknowledge our thanks for their kindness in giving us permission to visit the various islands, and we are also indebted to their keepers, who afforded us great assistance. Among the birds given in the following list, the Coal Titmouse, Spotted Flycatcher, and Crane are new to the Outer Hebrides ; and the Missel-Thrush and Golden-crested Wren have not been recorded before during the breeding season. The Heron also is an addition to the list of breed- ing species. By finding the nests of the Shoveller, Scaup, and Tufted Duck we were able to confirm the previous record in the “Annals” of these species breeding in the Outer Hebrides. MissEL-THRUSH, Zurdus visctvorus, Linneeus.—The breeding of this species may now be regarded as established. I saw a Missel- Thrush in the Castle grounds at Stornoway on 2nd July, and a few days later, on the 7th, I came across three, two old ones and a young one, which had evidently been bred in the district. In all probability the pair of birds seen in the Castle grounds by Dr. Mackenzie on 26th April 1go2 (‘ Annals,” 1902, p. 138) bred there, and were not just passing migrants, as suggested by Mr. Harvie- Brown. The woods round the Castle are of considerable extent, and it is not always easy to find the Missel-Thrushes, so that may account for Mr. Harvie- Brown not seeing the birds during his visit. Sonc THRusH, Zurdus musicus, Linneus.—We found the Song Thrush fairly plentiful in all the islands, but their chief strong- hold is in the woods round Stornoway. It is found at a considerable height on the bleak hillsides, and I saw one singing on Eval, in North Uist, at about 800 feet, and another on the Cleisham in Harris at 600 feet. We were much struck by the dark colour of all the Song Thrushes we saw in Barra and the Uists. Near Stornoway I saw both light and dark examples, but I am not sure that the former were not young birds. BLACKBIRD, Zurdus merula, Linneus.—In Barra we saw a single male at North Bay and another in a small plantation on the 61 c 18 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY east side of the island. We only came across one in South Uist, and that was a male in the garden at Grogary Lodge. I saw a pair, and found a nest, in a garden near Loch Maddy, North Uist. Round Stornoway the Blackbird is nearly as common as the Song Thrush. Wuincnat, Pratincola rubetra (Linnzus).—We did not come across the Whinchat in either Barra, the Uists, or Benbecula. In Lewis I saw a pair near Loch Tholta Bhredein, some five miles to the south-west of Stornoway, and there are several pairs breeding in the Castle grounds near that town. STONECHAT, Pratincola rubicola (Linnzeus).—This species does not seem to have been found breeding in Barra. On 18th May we saw a single male by the side of Traig Mhoir, and on the 22nd a male and two females among the heather at the foot of Ben Erival. The first bird seen may possibly have been a passing migrant, but I do not think the other three were, as two of them, a pair, kept flying about as if they had a nest, though we failed to find one. In South Uist we saw a male near Daliburgh on rst June, and in Benbecula two pairs at the foot of Rueval. The Stonechat is not uncommon in North Uist, and I also saw it in Harris and Lewis. REDBREAST, /vithacus rubecula (Linneus).—We saw two Robins in Barra during the last week of May; it has bred there since 1892. Round Stornoway it is very abundant. WHITETHROAT, Sylvia cinerea (Bechstein).—A single bird, seen in a small plantation on the east side of Barra, was the only example of this species we came across in the Outer Hebrides. GOLDEN-CRESTED WREN, Aegulus cristatus, K. 1. Koch.—A few pairs of Golden-crested Wrens bred in the woods round the Castle at Stornoway, and I several times fell in with family parties of old and young birds. Mr. D. Mackenzie teils me this species is plentiful at Stornoway in the autumn, but I do not think it has been recorded before during the breeding season. HEDGE SPARROW, Accentor modularis (Linneus).—In Barra we came across a pair at North Bay, and a single bird amongst some trees near Traig Mhoir. Dr. M‘Rury does not seem to have met with this species in South Uist, but we saw one in the garden at Grogary Lodge, and another among some long heather near the head of Loch Skiport. It is common in the Castle grounds at Stornoway. Coat TirmouskE, Pariis britannicus, Sharpe and Dresser.—In October 1904 Mr. D. Mackenzie, Stornoway, saw a small flock of Coal Tits on a tree in front of Mhorsgail Lodge, Lewis. He ran into the lodge for a gun to shoot a specimen, but the Tits NOTES ON BIRDS SEEN IN THE OUTER HEBRIDES 19 had gone by the time he returned. Mr. Mackenzie is a native of Sutherland, and is well acquainted with the Coal Tit there, so I think there is no doubt about the identification. During the first week of July I frequently came across family parties of Coal Tits in the woods round Stornoway Castle, which had evidently been bred there, but it cannot be said to be an abundant species. Waite WactaliL, MWotacilla alba, Linneeus.—This species was fairly numerous on migration in Barra from the 18th, the day we landed, to the 22nd of May. SPOTTED FLYCATCHER, MJuscicapa grisola, Linneeus.—On 7th July I saw a single bird at the back of the Castle gardens, Stornoway. It appeared from its actions to have young or a nest near, but I was unable to find either or see a second bird. SwaLLow, Airundo rustica, Linnzeus.—We saw three Swallows at the back of Ben Scurrival, Barra, on 22nd May. Mr. D. Mackenzie, Stornoway, tells me that about fifteen years ago the coachman at the Castle asked him to come and see a pair of birds which were nesting at the stables, as he did not know what they were. Mr. Mackenzie found that they were a pair of Swallows, but he has not seen any nesting there since. SAND MartTIN, Chelidon riparia (Linnzus).—One seen at Rueless, on the east side of Barra, on 24th May. GREENFINCH, Ligurinus chloris, Linneus.—No mention of this species at Stornoway is made in Mr. Harvie Brown’s supple- ment to the “ Fauna of the Outer Hebrides,” but from all I was able to learn it must have been a breeding species there for some time. It is not yet really abundant, but I saw a few both old and young birds in the Castle grounds. House Sparrow, Passer domesticus, Linnzeus.—The House Sparrow in the Outer Hebrides seems still to be confined to Castlebay, Barra; Tarbert, Harris ; and Stornoway, Lewis. TREE Sparrow, Passer montanus (Linnzus).—We only saw the Tree Sparrow in Barra at Eoligary, where there is a long- established colony. On the west side of North Uist I came across six Tree Sparrows by the roadside near Balmartin. They were all old birds, but though I watched them for some time I was unable to ascertain whether they were nesting. At Stornoway I found a small colony of six pairs breeding in the Castle grounds. The nests were in Spruce trees, and in three of them the lower part was made of dried grass, and the upper, the domed part, of green moss. / (Zo be continued.) 20 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY BIRD-LIFE AS OBSERVED AT SKERRYVORE LIGHTHOUSE: By James Tomison, Principal Light-Keeper. SKERRYVORE LIGHTHOUSE is situated on a small reef in North at. 56° 109 22” and) West Long. 7° 6’ 32” 3 71 nautical miles W.S.W. + W. of the island of Tiree, the nearest land ; 33 miles S. + E. of Barrahead, the southern- most point of the Outer Hebrides; 30 miles W. of Iona; and 50 miles from the nearest point of the mainland of Scotland. From Hynish Point in Tiree to the Mackenzie Rock—3 miles W.S.W. of Skerryvore—there is a continuation of “foul” ground consisting of small rocks, some above sea- level, others covered at high water, and others constantly under water, but near enough the surface to be a source of the greatest danger to the mariner who unwittingly comes in their vicinity. There is thus stretching right out in the Atlantic, in the fairway of all shipping passing through the Outer Minch, as dangerous a line of reefs and shoals as can be found anywhere round our coasts. The Skerryvore, or Big Skerry, was selected as the most suitable on which to erect a lighthouse, owing to it being always above water, and being of some considerable extent, affording fair facilities for landing. The superficial area of this rock at low water is about 300 sq. ft., and less than half that size at high water. The rock itself consists of quartz, felspar, hornblende, and mica, and is extremely hard, so that where it is polished by the action of the sea it is quite smooth and slippery, and landing on it has been described as “like climbing up the neck of a bottle.” A trap rock in the form of a dyke of basalt intersects the strata, and lies almost due North and South, being continuous until lost in the sea at either end, a distance of 150 feet. The building of the lighthouse was begun in 1838, and after six years of arduous labour was completed, and the light first exhibited on Ist Feb. 1844. It has now withstood the force of the Atlantic storms and billows for over sixty years, and to-day shows not the slightest signs of decay. From an ornithological point of view it is a place of BIRD-LIFE AS OBSERVED AT SKERRYVORE LIGHTHOUSE 21 considerable interest, standing as it does right in the track of the migration stream passing between the Inner and the Outer Isles. Since being appointed there in August 1903, I have kept notes of all feathered visitors that have come under my notice, and at the request of the Editors I have prepared this contribution regarding them. We have no birds that may be classified as residents, for the simple fact that there is no place to reside on. A. ste7zis, L., 83, cas. Gaudinia fragilis, Beauv., casual 83, 92. . Phragmites communis, 7727., All. Cynosurus echinatus, L., 83 cas. Molinia varia, Schranck, 78, t.e. in all the vice-counties. var. depauperata (Zzvd/.) has been recorded from a number of vice-counties, and probably may be found where the plant grows on poor open moorlands and other suitable localities. Eragrostis major, Host, 83 cas. Keeleria cristata, ers. Under this name records stand for all the vice-counties except 76, 77? 78, S84, 105, 108+, 112; but a critical examination of examples from Scotland by Dr. Domin has shown the following results :— K. glauca, DC., subsp. arenaria, Dumort., 85, 90, 95, 106, 107. K. britannica, Domzn. (probably a subspecies of K. gracilis, Fers.), is the common plant in Scotland, though as yet recorded only from 83, 90, 92, 94, 95, 96, 109, III. K. phleoides, Pers., 83 cas. Catabrosa aquatica, Beauv., 105 ; var. littoralis, Parn., 103. Dactylis hispanica, Roth., 83 cas. Lchinaria capitata, Desf., 83 cas. Briza media, Z., 99; B. minor, L., casual, 83, 92; &. maxima, L., casual, 83, 92, 93. Wangenheimia disticha, Mcench., 83 cas. Poa annua, Z., vay. supina, Gaud., 106; P. bulbosa, L., 83 cas. Poa glauca, Sm., 89, 108. P. Balfouri, Parnell, 92, 97, 106. 228 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY iP nemoralis, Z., 74, $2, 84, °85, 932, TO7, 10S: var. “divaticata, Syme, 94, (delete 92); var. glaucantha, Rezchb., 98, 108. P. compressa, Z., 85 confirmed, 92 7 ? P-Ghaixt, Vill., 83. P. pratensis, Z., 107, ze. in all the vice-counties ; var. sub-czerulea (Sm.), 81, 96, 97. P. palustris, L., 83 cas.; P. persica, Trin., 83 cas. P. trivialis, Z., 107 ; z.e. in all the vice-counties. P. bulbosa, L., var. vivipara, 83 cas. Glyceria fluitans, #. 57, 84; ze. in all the vice-counties; var. triticea, 77., 90. G. plicata, 77, 74, 76, 90, 91, 92, 94, 108, 111 confirmed ; var. pedicellata (Zowns.), 111 ; var. declinata (Gré.), 92, 94, 96, IOo. G. aquatica, Sw., 82, 91, 93, 94, 101, (delete 74). G. distans, Wahlend., 84, 106. Sclerochloa dura, Beauv., 83 cas. S. procumbens, Beauv. (=Festuca procumbens, Awnth); almost certainly not native in Scotland, 83 cas., 91, 92 (plentiful in 1906 along N. bank of new channel of River Dee at Aberdeen). Festuca rottbeellioides, Awnth., 72; #: uniglumis, Soland., casual in 83 and 92. F. Myuros, L., 83 cas. . sciuroides, Aoth., 79. . ovina, Z., var. paludosa (Gaud.), 105, 106. . rubra, Z., has no record for 80; var. grandiflora, Hacke/, go. . sylvatica, V2//., 93. F. elatior, Z., has no record for 80; var. pratensis, Auds., 74, 84, 93, 95- EF. ciliata, Pers., 83 cas.; F: gustica, Bertol., casual 83, 92. Bromus giganteus, Z., 97. B. erectus, Huds., 72, 73; 3B. madritensis, L., 92 cas. B. racemosus, Z., 80, 85, 91, 93, 9473; B. commutatus, Schrad., 107. B. mollis, Z., vay. glabratus, Ded/., 75°; var. Lloydianus, Syme, 73. B. Alopecuros, Poir., 83 cas.; B. arvensis, L., 83 cas.; B. divari- catus, Rhode, 83 cas.; &. znermis, Leys., 85 cas.; B. japonicus, . Thunb., 83 cas. ; &. macrostachys, Desf., 83 cas. B. patulus, Mert, and Koch., 83 cas.; B. rigidus, Roth., 83 cas. ; B. scoparius, L., 83 cas.; B. secalinus, L., var. velutinus (Schrad.), 83 cas., 85 cas. B. squarrosus, Vs., casual 983; (925-8. ecloru mi, We es eas ede wntolordes, A.B.K., frequent casual, 83, 84, 92. Brachypodium distachyon, Reem, and Schult., casual in 83 and 92. Lolium rigidum, Gaud., 83 cas.; L. temulentum, Z., 83 cas., 93 cas. Psilurus nardotdes, Trin., 83 cas. he} Fe} bj by TOPOGRAPHICAL BOTANY OF SCOTLAND 229 Agropyrum caninum, Z., 84. A. repens, Z., var., Leersianum, Gray, common, 81, 93, 94, 95, 96, 98, 106. _ A. pungens (?) Rem. and Schilt., 93. A. acutum, Rem. and Schult. 75, 90, 102, 103. A. junceum, Beauv., 82, 84. A. triticeum, J. Geertn., 83 cas. i gilops cylindrica, Host., 83 cas.; 4. ovata, L., 83 cas.; &. peregrina, Wackel, 83 cas.; @. speltowdes, Tausch., var. Aucheri (Boiss.), 83 cas.; 4. triaristata, Willd., 83 cas. ; LE, triuncialis, L., 83 cas. Hordeum murinum, Z., 747. H. marinum, uds., 83 cas., 842, 92 frequent cas. fT. bulbosum, L., 83 cas.; H. jubatum, L., 83 cas.; H. europaeum, All., 83 cas.; A. sylvaticum, Huds., 83 cas. fT, Caput-Meduse, Cosson, casual in 83 and 92. Elymus arenarius, Z., 84; £. szbiricus, L., casual in 83 and 85. GYMNOSPERMS. CONIFER. Juniperus communis, Z., 79?; var. intermedia, Vyman, 108. J. nana, Wil/d., 93. Taxus baccata, Z., 84, 937. CRYPTOGAMS. FILICEs. Hymenophyllum tunbridgense, S7z., (dedete 112). Cryptogramme crispa, 2. Br, 94. Asplenium Adiantum-nigrum, Z., vay. Serpentini, Koch., 94. As richomanes, /., 112. A. Ruta-muraria, Z., 112; var. pseudo-germanicum, JZz/de, 89. Athyrium alpestre, J/7/de, 105, 106. Cystopteris fragilis, Lernh., var. dentata, Hook., 93, 943; var. sem- pervirens, 92. Polystichum lobatum, Pres/., var. aculeatum, Syme, 79. Lastrea Filix-mas, Z., var. abbreviata, Badb., 106. L. spinulosa, Pres/., 79, 81, 94. L. dilatata, PresZ., var. collina, Moore, 111. Phegopteris Dryopteris, /ée, 110. P. polypodioides, Fé, 93. Ophioglossum vulgatum, Z., 94. Botrychium Lunaria, Z., vay. incisum, AZi/de, Pentland Hills. 230 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY EQUISETACE. Equisetum maximum, Zam., 34. E. arvense, Z., var. alpestre, Wahlenb., 72°; var. nemorosum, Braun, 106. E, sylvaticum, Z., var. capillare ({offm.), 92, 107. E. palustre, Z., vay. polystachyum, 93 ; var. nudum, /Vewm., 111. E. limosum, S., var. fluviatile (Z.), 73. E. hyemale, Z., 97. E. variegatum, Sch/ezch, 104, 108, 110; var. arenarium, /Vewm., 106. LYCOPODIACE. Lycopodium Selago, Z., var. recurvum, Desv., 106. L. inundatum, Z., 97. L. annotinum, Z., 96, 106. L. alpinum, Z., var. decipiens, Syme, 106. Isoetes lacustris, Z., 98, 102 (Lightfoot). I. echinospora, Dur., 112. CHARACES. Chara fragilis, Desv., 81, 93; var. capillacea, Coss. and G., 73; gar, delicatula, A: 67.5 03, 105. C. aspera, Will/d., 81, 93 ; var. desmacantha, #7. and /. Groves, 111. C. baltica, Bruzel, 111. Cyhispida, -2.,°80, 152; 35,02. 10G: Cyvulganis, 2216 5,503- Nitella translucens, Agardh, 74, 85. N. opaca, Agardh, 94. SUPPEENENT, While these “ Additions and Corrections” have been in course of publication, various papers and short notes have been published in botanical journals, and other information has also been acquired. Such additional information as came to hand in time has been included in these additions ; but a good many notes relate to species in families already passed. As it appears desirable to make this record as far as possible complete, up to this date (July 1907), these are given as a supplementary list below. ~ RANUNCULACEZ. Adonis autumnalis, L., 83 cas. Ranunculus circinatus, Szb¢h., 92. R. trichophyllus, Chaix. Delete 112. R. Drouettii, Godr., 112 confirmed. Se — TOPOGRAPHICAL BOTANY OF SCOTLAND 231 R. scoticus, Marshall, 94. R. sardous, Crantz, 102. R. trilobus, L., 83 cas. Caltha radicans, Forster, 94. Delphinium Consolida, V.., D. divaricatum, Ledeb., D. hybridum, Steph., and D. pubescens, DC. ; all casuals in 83. LEranthis hyemalts, Salisb., 85. PAPAVERACEA. Papaver hybridum, L., and P. nudicaule, L., casuals in 83. Argemone mexicana, L.., 83 cas. CRUCIFERA. Arabis hirsuta, Scop., 99. Cardamine pratensis, Z., var. dentata, Hayne and Welw., 94. (Alyssum maritimum, L., said to have been found in gt or 92.) A. incanum, Z., var. viride, Zausch., 83 cas. Cochlearia alpina, Wats., go. flesperis laciniata, All., 83 cas. Stsymbrium orientale, L., 83 cas. Brassica subularia, Brot., 83 cas. Lberis sempervirens, L., 92 Cas. Carrichtera Vella, DC., 83 cas. Chorispora syriaca, Boiss., and C. tenella, DC., casuals in 83. RESEDACE. Reseda crispata, Link., 83 cas. VIOLACE. Viola lutea, Huds., var. amcena (Symons), 94. POLYGALACE. Polygala oxyptera, Rezchend., 102. CARYOPHYLLACEZ. Velezia rigida, L., 83 cas. Dianthus barbatus, L., 83 cas. Gypsophila paniculata, L., 83 cas. Saponaria officinalis, L., 81. Silene conica, Z., 33 cas. S. dichotoma, Ehrh., 94. S. anglica, Z., and var. guznguevulnera, L., S. juvenalis, Del., and S. rubella, L., casuals in 83. Cerastium triviale, Zz7k., var. holosteoides, #7, 112 (Fair Isle). 232 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY C. alpinum, Z., var. pubescens, Syme, 94. C. hirsutum, Tenore, 92 cas. Flolosteum umbellatum, 1.., 83 cas. Sagina Reutert, Boiss., 83 cas. S. apetala, Z., 103. Stergula vulgaris, Boenn., 112 (Fair Isle). PORTULACACE. Claytonia virginica, L., 83 cas. ELATINACE. Elatine hexandra, DC., 103. MALVACE#. Althea rosea, Cav., 83 cas. Lavatera punctata, All., 83 cas. Malva moschata, Z., 84 cas.; JZ. borealis, Wallm., 83 cas. LINACE. Linum usitatissimum, V., casual in 81, 92, 93; L. angustifolium, Huds., LZ. grandifiorum, Desf., and L. perenne, L., casuals in 83. GERANIACE. Geranium lucidum, Z., 94. G. Robertianum, Z., vav. modestum, /ord., 94. G. reflexum, L., 83 cas. Erodium cicutarium, Z’ e777, 112. E. maritimum, ZL’ /eriz., 83 cas. Oxalis Acetosella, Z., 112.- O. stricta, L., 83 cas. To this name must be transferred the records formerly given under O. corniculata, in accordance with the fact that these names have been transposed in English floras. Impatiens Roylei, Walp., casual in 83, 92, and no doubt elsewhere. Limnanthes Douglasit, R. Br., 83 cas. AMPELIDACEZ., Vitis vinifera, L. Seedlings may often be found in numbers on rubbish heaps near towns, ¢.g. in 83 and g2, no doubt from refuse of fruiterers’ shops; but they seldom grow to more than a foot or so in height, or survive more than one winter. (Zo be continued.) ee ON THE FLORA OF SHETLAND 233 ON, THE FLORA, OF SHETREAND: By WitiiaAmM H. Beesy, F.L.S. (Continued from p. 169.) *Rhinanthus grenlandicus, Chabert.—Mr. C. H. Ostenfeld, who has had great facilities for the study of the arctic and boreal forms, has kindly named my plants (conf. also Ostenfeld’s “Phanerogameze and Pteridophyta of the Faroes,” p. 51). U. Cliffs north of Saxa Vord. S. By Burga Water and on holm in the same loch. *var. Drwmmond-Hayi (B. White).—N. Hillside, Benegarth, North Roe. The Burga Water plant is “exactly the plant of the Faroes”; this, the large form, is rather less scarce than the variety. Luphrasia.—A detailed account of the species must be deferred, but the following are the forms so far detected :—£. dorealis, Towns. ; £. scottica, Wetest; E£. Foulaensis, Towns. ; £. curta, Fr. £. curta f. piccola, Towns. Statice maritima, Mill, *var. plantfolia (Syme).—U. Hill of Hamar, near Baltasound. N. Rocks on the east side of Sand Voe.— I have had the Unst plant in cultivation, side by side with the type, since 1898 ; in addition to the recorded characters, I may mention that under these equal conditions the variety flowers about three weeks earlier than the type. Plantago lanceolata, ..—D. A curious proliferous form occurred near Spiggie, with heads recalling the ‘ Hen-and-chickens” daisy, the central head being small, and surrounded by numerous very small heads on long stalks proceeding from below the base of the main head. The plants (2) were seen two years in succession. *var. depressa, Rostr. (‘‘Flo. Danica,” tab. 3008).—U. Sea-sands, Sandwick. N. Hillside, Benegarth. L. Scalloway. D. In many places. Chiefly on sand, but not confined to it. Leaves very broad, which is the chief characteristic. Doubtless it is the plant recorded as P. media by Edmondston. Mr. Ostenfeld writes of the Unst plant— “Just the same form that E. Rostrup named var. depressa.” Atriplex hastata, L.—U. A common weed at Baltasound. *A. laciniata, L.—D. Some half-dozen plants on a sandbank near Clayval (1899). Next year I visited the spot again, but found the A/rflex and all the other low-growing plants buried under an additional foot or two of sand, above which the tops of Psamma arenaria just showed. Doubtless the plant occurs 234 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY in other places on the adjacent coast, which affords many suitable habitats. * Salix Caprea, L.—S. Almost covering two small holms in the middle of Mousa Vord Loch, to which, so far as known, it is now entirely confined. This is a puzzling form, owing to the young branches being pubescent, and to the leaves having a tendency to be somewhat obovate. The Rev. E. F. Linton was at first disposed to consider it a hybrid between S. Cafrea and one of the other Caprvee, but on my explaining that it was the only Sax occurring either on or near the holms, he referred it to S. Caprea, informing me that sometimes in very exposed situations in the north, the branchlets have a tendency to be- come pubescent. I have a tree in the garden which I believe to have been grown from a cutting of the Mousa Vord plant. I omitted to label it, so cannot be quite positive; but I do not myself feel much doubt, as I have never brought into this garden any other willow of any sort whatever, and as I know of no S. Caprea in the near vicinity, it is unlikely to have originated from wind-borne seed. Mr. C. H. Ostenfeld con- siders the Mousa Vord plant a large-leaved form of S. cnerea, but in this opinion I am unable to concur; partly because my large series of Surrey Capre@, which has been criticised by both F. B. White and E. F. Linton, shows one or two plants with leaves having an obovate tendency, as well as one plant from dry sand on the middle of Bagshot Heath with much more pubescent twigs than the Shetland plant, but chiefly because the clothing of the under side of the leaf is to my eye that of S. Caprea and not S. cinerea. Mr. Ostenfeld agrees that the garden plant is S. Capvea. * Betula alba, 1..—Recorded by T. Edmondston in a list of Shetland plants contributed to “Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist.,” 1841 ; also by him in the same year in the “ New Stat. Account of Scotland.” The Shetland volume of the latter work contains a chapter entitled ‘“ General Observations on the County,” by Dr. Laurence Edmondston, father of the botanist. Dr. Edmondston, who was himself a naturalist, confirms the occurrence of the birch in these words—“ No indigenous trees are to be seen, if we except a few dwarf bushes of birch, willow, and mountain ash,” The fact that Edmondston omits the birch from his Flora is of no moment; he also omits sundry quite common plants such as Lotus corniculatus, Galium Aparine, Lobelia Dortmanna, actually recorded by himself in his lists published a few years earlier! It may be mentioned that in the north part of Northmaven there is a loch called “ Birka Water,” while in the south part of the same parish there is a ward hill called “ Birka Vird”; but whether the birch still lingers in ON THE FLORA OF SHETLAND 235 Shetland is at present uncertain. I accept the record on the authority of Dr. Laurence Edmondston. I have good specimens of branches and stem from the peat, kindly sent me by Mr. William J. Gordon, Yell. [ Alnus glutinosa, Gaert.— Hazel, mountain ash, and elder shrubs are found in the mountains,”’—Rev. James Gordon, in “Stat. Account of Scotland,” (North Yell and Fetlar) 1794.—Mr. Symers M. Macvicar, to whom I am indebted for extracts from the old “Statistical Account,” suggests that “elder” is a mis- print for ‘‘alder.” This I think very likely, for it is pretty sure that elder bushes never grew “in the mountains” in Shetland. Roots from the peat in North Roe have been referred doubtfully to Alnus. The only tree I have seen is by the side of the inn at Tresta, where many plants both native and ’ exotic have been gathered together in the unusually sheltered garden, by a former proprietor. I have not ascertained the origin of the tree, which is a fine healthy specimen some twenty feet high. ] *Corylus Avellana, L.—Yell. ‘“Hazels . . . are found in the mountains.” Rey. James Gordon, Z¢, 1794. Delting.— “The mountain ash or rowan tree, the hazel, the honeysuckle, the hip brier, and willow, are natives in many of the islets or holms in the freshwater lochs.” Rey. John Bryden in ‘‘ New Stat. Account,” 1841. I regard this evidence as satisfactory considering the nature of the plant. As it occurred on the holms, there is no particular reason to suppose that it has become extinct. The nuts are found from time to time in the peat. Lotamogeton polygontfolius, Pour., form cancellatus, Fryer.—This is the name that has been given to the remarkable form, found in the Burn of Brooster, near Walls. (Scot. Nat.,” January 1891.) P. vaginatus, Turcz.—L. Tingwall Loch, 1887. This plant, the exact name of which has been somewhat doubtful, is now definitely identified by Mr. Arthur Bennett (“J. of Bot.,” May 1907). It also occurs in Asta Loch, which drains out of Tingwall Loch. The plant which occurs abundantly in Spiggie Loch, Dunrossness, is probably the same; but in the absence of fruit, or more developed specimens, Mr. Bennett is unable to speak with certainty. As a British plant, it is confined to Shetland. Iris Pseud-acorus, L.—All the plants examined, in various districts, belong to Z. acoriformis, Boreau. ' *Carex glauca x flava——S. Holm in a small tarn on Gibbie Law’s Burn. This plant, which appeared to me to be a hybrid, is 236 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY thought by Mr. Ostenfeld to probably originate as above. Mr. Ostenfeld added, that C. Hornschuchiana might be the second parent if it occurred. This sedge does not, however, occur on the holm, which is a very small one, and I have not seen it growing near. *C. vestcaria, L.—S. Abundant in drains running into the west end of Grasswater, near Bridge of Walls. * Triticum junceum x repens.—U. Sea-sands, Norwick.—N. Head of Sand Voe. Abundant in both places. Mr. Ostenfeld con- firms the name. “Asplenium Ruta-murarta, L.—S. On several groups of rocks about the north Loch of Hostigates. “A. Trichomanes, L.—S. Sparingly on rocks, west above Hamari Water. Very sparingly on a ledge of rocks, above the south side of the North Voe of Clousta. folypodium Phegopteris, L.—N. Exposed ledge of rock at the N.W. corner of the Bjorgs of Skelberry, alt. c. 550 feet.— Conf. Osmunda regalis, L.—S. South Loch of Hostigates ; Burga Water ; Flatpunds Loch; Galta Water. On holms in the above lochs, abundant on most. By Hostigates I found two seedlings respectively $ inch and 14 inch high. ‘These were half-buried among large stones, and had so far escaped the sheep. ‘The fern fruits very freely, and myriads of spores must be drifted ashore every year, but no plants are seen on the shores of the lochs. —Conf. “Tsoétes echinospora, Dur.—S. Culeryn; Burga Water; Kirkiegarth and Bardaster Lochs, Walls, and in several other lochs. Apparently common in this district. Lsoétes lacustris, L.—The spores of this species are covered with thin ridges, or plates, not tubercles. All our books describe them wrongly, down to the last edition of Babington. They are correctly described in the Scandinavian Floras. See Blytt, “Norges Flora” ; and Lange, ‘‘ Danske Flora.” THe FRESH-WATER Houtms.-—The examination of the Holms which are scattered over so many of the fresh-water lochs has especially attracted my attention during recent years, although comparatively few of them have actually been visited. Whether regarded as the final refuges of some species no longer known in Shetland beyond their confines, or as enabling us to conjure up a picture of Shetland loch-side vegetation, as it was before the advent of the sheep, these holms demand our serious consideration ; and until they have been more fully investigated it cannot be claimed ON THE FLORA OF SHETLAND 237 that our knowledge of the Shetland Flora approaches completeness. As recorded above, Sa/zx Caprea is entirely confined to two small holms in the middle of Mousa Vord Loch; Vzcia sepium is practically extinct, except on various holms on which it flourishes ; while Osmunda regalis luxuriates on the holms in some four or five different lochs, and doubtless on others, but is no longer found on their shores. It may be worth while to try to give a rough picture of the vegetation on some of these holms. Burga-water.— As one approaches the green holm at the north end of this loch, from the south, one sees a thick belt of Osmunda surrounding a third or more of the islet; mixed with it grow Spir@a Ulmaria and other common species, while over all trail festoons of Vicia sepium and Lathyrus pratensis; behind this belt are considerable thickets of Salzx aurita, while in the open grassy spots between the thickets are found RAznanthus granlandicus, Hieracium crocatum, and other interesting plants; the northern part of the holm is sterile, and is covered with a dense growth of Luzula sylvatica almost to the exclusion of any other plants. Hostigates.—The small holm in the south loch contains large clumps of Osmunda mixed with other ferns and common plants, as well as well-grown examples of Pyrus Aucuparia; these last, however, are not so fine as those on the holm in the adjacent north loch, where they reach a height of some six feet. Hamari-water.—The holm in this loch is particularly interesting. A bank along one side was covered with Rosa glauca and Lonicera Periclymenum, both flowering profusely ; among and below them common ferns luxuriate, and below these Spirea, Caltha, etc. ; while in the dryer parts Wreraciwm strictum is plentiful, as well as Salix aurita, S. repens, and various other plants. At the farther end I came upon a little forest of miniature rowan trees, most of them perfectly symmetrical little trees, covered with flowers and fruit, but none of them over four feet in height! One tree a little under four feet bore between thirty and forty bunches of withered flowers and half-ripe fruit ; the lowest branches sprang from the main stem only some three or four inches from the soil, and were borne down and touching the ground with the weight of the fruit. Nowhere else have I seen, in the wild state, plants that so nearly approach the dwarfed Japanese trees with which we are now familiar. Unfortunately, I had no camera with me; but when at Clousta some few years later, I made a special visit to Hamari- water for the purpose of photographing the little forest. After wading across to the holm, I was surprised to find that there were no rowan-trees to be seen ; eventually, however, I recognised them in a number of dead-looking sticks, some bearing one leaf, some two or three, but no sign of flower or fruit. On getting back to Clousta at night, I learned that there had been an exceptionally severe snow-storm with biting north-east wind at the end of May 238 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY or beginning of June, and this no doubt accounted for the disaster. The incident well exemplifies the precariousness of the seasons in Shetland. Mousa Vord.—The two holms in the middle of this loch are practically one, being connected by a ridge of rocks a little below the surface. The soil is poor, and owing to this and to the greater part of their area being covered by the thickets of Salix Caprea, the flora is very scanty indeed. The following is a list of all the plants seen on these holms :— Ranunculus acris. Rumex Acetosa. - repens. ay 2acetosellar Caltha palustris. Salix Caprea. a », subsp. radicans. | Luzula sylvatica. Cardamine pratensis. Anthoxanthum odoratum. Cerastium triviale. Agrostis alba. Sagina procumbens. Holcus lanatus. Spiraea Ulmaria. Poa pratensis. Geum rivale. ,», trivialis. Angelica sylvestris. Festuca rubra. From these few observations on the flora of the holms I think one may safely surmise what the loch-side vegetation was like in the olden time a thousand years ago. While now little meets the eye but the eternally recurring prospect of undulating purple-brown heather-clad hills stretching right down to the margin of the loch basin, with rarely a shrub to break the monotony, there would then have been the pleasant relief of a broad margin of greenery round many of the lochs ; first, a belt of Osmunda and other ferns, as well as many other herbaceous species ; behind these thickets of wild roses and honeysuckle, or of several species of willow, with small trees of mountain ash and sometimes birch interspersed. This vegetation would extend some little way up the ravines and gullies, while the lower slopes of the hills themselves would be dotted over with shrubs of one sort or another; so that the ancient landscape must have been far more diversified and pleasing to the eye than the present often somewhat dreary aspect. So far as the herbaceous plants are concerned, the sheep, and to a lesser degree the ponies and cattle, are responsible for the change that has been wrought ; but in the case of the trees and shrubs the hand of man has been a potent influence, ‘‘for a shrub of the size of a walking-stick, a flail tree, or a fishing-rod, would prove a temptation too strong for the moral courage of a Shetlander to resist.”1 Then much brush- wood was no doubt cut for firing, while the sheep, again, have put the finishing touch by nibbling off any seedlings as fast as they spring up and so destroying all chance of renovation. As an illustration of another phase of vegetation in Shetland I 1 Rev. John Bryden, Zc. ON THE FLORA OF SHETLAND 239 give a list of the plants seen growing on the turf roof of a byre at the croft of Setter, near Walls. Cardamine pratensis. Galeopsis Tetrahit. Cerastium triviale. Rumex Acetosella. . tetrandum, Juncus supinus. Stellaria media. 5, bufonius, Sagina procumbens. »» | squarrosus. Potentilla silvestris. Agrostis vulgaris. Hydrocotyle vulgaris. Aira flexuosa. Galium saxatile. »» preecox. Scabiosa Succisa. Poa annua. Solidago Virga-aurea. »» pratensis. Leontodon autumnalis. I may add, in conclusion, that the few observations on the scenery past and present apply more particularly to the peat and heather tracts. On the limestone, clay-slate, etc., where the hills are clothed chiefly with coarse grasses, the general coloration is of course much brighter; but there is the same monotony as regards trees and shrubs. At the same time one often comes across charming burn-side fore- ground studies, while the grandeur of the coast scenery alone more than compensates for any shortcomings that some may find in the inland landscape. THAMES DITTON, J7/ay 1907. A CONLERIBUTION TO. A FLORAVOR SE, BIEDAY BEING WAY (LIST OF CERGAIN 2 EI@ rian: MOSSES, HEPATICAL AND, FRESHWATER A GAE, By C. Gorpvon Hewitt, M.Sc. DURING the visit to St. Kilda, in July 1906, which I made in order to study the insect fauna of that isolated volcanic rock, I also collected a few lichens, alge, and bryophytes, with the hope of assisting in the completion of the flora of that island, as these groups had not been studied to my knowledge. The lichens were kindly identified by my friend Dr. O. V. 240 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY Darbishire, the rest by Mr. H. Murray of the Manchester Museum, to both of whom I wish to express my thanks. The following list is not supposed to be by any means complete, and any one making a closer study of the lower orders of plants would be well rewarded. ALG&. Rhizoclonium hieroglyphicum, Kutz., var. cortwosum. Tetraspora gelatinosa, Desv.—On JVardia, also in damp places on Armeria maritima. HEPATIC. Metzgeria furcata (L.), Raddi. Nardia compressa (Hook.), G. and Benn.—On rocks in bed of stream. Chiloscyphus polyanthus (L.), Dum.—This interesting form almost fills the ‘‘ Well of Virtues” at the bottom of the glen. Muscl. Mnium hornum, ..—On the top of Connacher. Pterygophyllum lucens, Brid.—In damp places. Fissidens adiantoides, Hedw.—In moist situations. LICHENS. Cladonia uncialis, Hffm. Cladonta, sp. C. furcata, Hffm. C. rangiferina, Ny). Ramatina farinacea (L.), Ach. R. polymorpha, Ach. Parmelia saxatilis (L.), Ach. P. oltvacea, L. Ricasolia amplissima, Scop.—This usually lignicolous species was found on rocks of Mullach of Bich, and Cairn Mor. R. lete-virens (Lightft.), Nyl.—On the cliffs of Ruadval. Peltigera canina, L.—On the rocks of the cleits. | P. horizontals, L. | Physcia aquila.—Ach. Xanthoria parietina, L. Placodium, sp. Se os A CONTRIBUTION TO A FLORA OF ST. KILDA 241 Pannaria plumbea, Lightft—On Ruadval. Ochrolechia parella (L.), Mass. Acarospora fuscata (Schrad.), Th. Fr.—On the rocks of cleits. Biatora lucida (Ach.), Th. Fr.—On the rocks of cleits. Rhizocarpon geographicum (1..), Dl.—On the rocks of cleits. The orchis O. maculata which occurs on thebanks of the stream interested me during my visit. It is usually pollinated by bees, but as no bees have yet been discovered in St. Kilda, the flowers of that island have to depend on other insects for pollination. Quite accidentally one morning a dipterous fly, an Anthomyia, I believe, settled on my hand ; upon its head I noticed two pollinia of O. maculata, but before I was able to capture it, it flew away. O. maculata is no doubt dependent on the visits of flower-haunting flies and other insects in this island, where the hum of the bee has not yet been heard. THE UNIVERSITY, MANCHESTER, August 1907. REE. NOMENCLATURE OF BRIDISH PLANTS: By GEoRGE CLARIDGE Druce, M.A., F.L.S. IN my paper on the “ Nomenclature of British Plants” which appeared in the “Annals” for October 1906, but which unfortunately I had no opportunity of seeing in proof, so that numerous misprints occur, I made some suggestions of a tentative nature as to certain changes which, if the Vienna “ Actes” were followed, might have to be made in the names of our British plants. These were based upon the arrangement and limitations of Bentham and MHooker’s “Genera Plantarum.” In 1907 Rendle and Britten issued a “List of British Seed-Plants and Ferns,” in which the compilers adopt the sequence and generic limitations of Groves’s edition of “ Babington’s Manual of British Botany,” which differs con- siderably from those used by Bentham and Hooker. In this List about seventy of the names suggested by me in the foregoing paper are also used, so that, working independently, it is pleasing to find that agreement in the 64 E 242 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY majority of cases is obtained. Erwin Janchen of Vienna, an enthusiastic worker at nomenclature, has also published a list of alterations which are necessitated in Fritsch’s “ Ex- kursion Flora” of Austria, and also adopts a considerable number of the foregoing names. He also chooses the following names suggested by me in the “ Annals” which are not used by Rendle and Britten: Calamagrostis canescens, Phragmites vulgaris, Bromus hordeaceus, Polygonatum odor- atum, and Crepis mollis. With regard to one of these, Poly- gonatum odoratum, doubts have been expressed as to whether Convallaria odorata, Miller, means our Polygonatum officinale, or rather refers to a form of P. multzflorum. If that be so, then our Polygonatum should be called Polygonatum angulosum (Lam.), since Convallaria angulosa, Lam., “FI. Fr.,” iii, 268 (1778), is earlier than 7%. offeznale, Alliom, “FU Reda) 1 3ici jos): The genus Lrythrea must be replaced by Centaurium, Miller, “ British Herbal,’ 1756, p. 625; and our plants are C. umbellatum, Gilib. (Erythrea Centaurium), C. vulgare, Rafn. (E. littoralis), C. latifolium (Sm.), C. pulchellum, Druce, and C. capitatum, Rendle and Britten, as Cextaurzon capitatum. Danaa cornubtense replaces Physospermum cornubiense according to Dr. Janchen. Carex Hostiana, DC., has pre- cedence over C. Hornschuchiana, Hoppe. ; and we must read Alnus rotundifolia, Miller, vice A. glutinosa, Gaertn. ; and Dr. Janchen gives good reason for rejecting Helzanthemum marifolium, Miller, in favour of H. canum, Baumg.—it is the Cistus canus, L., 1753. Coronopus verrucarius, M. and T., replaces C. procumbens, Gilib. /nula squarrosa, Bernh., must be substituted for 7. Cozyza, DC. ; and Dr. Janchen uses Matrz- caria suaveolens, Buchenau, instead of JZ. dzscotdea, DC. Taraxacum vulgare, Schrank, precedes 7. officenale, Wigg. ; and Dr. Janchen uses Hzeracium lanceolatum, Vill.,instead of H. strictum, Fries.! Rendle and Britten correct me in showing that Nymphotdes orbiculata, Gilib., must be written lV. peltatum, Rendl. and Brit. since pe/tatum was the oldest specific name. Other corrections made by them are of Sz/ene venosa, Gilib., which they suggest should be S. /atzfolia (Mill.), R. and B. ; and if S. Zatzfolia, Poiret, is not valid, then that must be so, 1 The Rev. W. R. Linton does not agree to this, but retains A. stréctum, Fr. THE NOMENCLATURE OF BRITISH PLANTS 243 although Schinz and Thellung, in “Bull. Herb. Boiss.,” p. 506, reject this and some other names, which they term “tot- geboren.” In this particular instance they use Sz/ene vulgarzs, Moench, but I should prefer to follow the plan followed by Rendle and Britten in using the earliest specific name, even if it had not been generally adopted. Statzce Armeria, L.,— it should be S. sarztezma, Mill.—is not British, nor are Rumex aqguaticus, L., and Carex vettlis, Fries. Valerianella rimosa, Bast., is older than V. Aurecula, DC. Cephalanthera Dama- sonium (Mill.) is rejected by Rendle and Britten in favour of C. grandifiora, S. F. Gray, but with this I do not concur. Two obvious errors in my paper are Polygonum sagittatum, Gilib., which was a misprint for Hagopyrum sagittatum, Gilib. (it is correctly given on p. 218); the other is Hordeum bulbosum, L., which was a lapsus calami for H. nodosum, L. H. Schinz and A. Thellung in “Bull. Herb. Boiss.,” Zc, also adopt some names used by me in the “Annals” instead of those used in Rendle and Britten’s List, eg. Ranunculus Jeniculaceus, Gilib., instead of R. devarzcatus, Schrank, and Galium hercynicum, Weig., instead of G. saxatile, L. I cannot follow Rendle and Britten in using the name Myosotis scorpiotdes, L., for MW. palustris ; but on the contrary, following the English custom, since the var. a in the “ Species Plantarum,” of JZ. scorpiozdes, L., is arvenszs (if this name be retained), I should write WZ. scorpiozdes, L., vice M. arvensis. There is also this advantage, that in rejecting MW. arvensis, Hill, we get rid of a most ambiguous name, since it was partly, if not wholly, 1/7. versecolor. M. palustris, Hill, was the Water Forget-me-not, and is well defined. To go into a detailed criticism of the “ Plant List” would now take up too much space and time, but one may point out that Oxonds reclinata is wrongly omitted and Ophzoglossum lusitanicum wrongly included. Only those who have worked at the subject know how extremely difficult it is; to prepare a list without errors is well-nigh impossible, and even then the names selected may, according to the standpoint adopted, be rejected for several reasons. This much may be said, that Britten and Rendle, Janchen, and Schinz and Thellung still differ widely in their choice of names. The latter authors, I think correctly, use Aradzs scabra, All., instead of A. stricta 244 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY Huds., and write Ludvzgza, L., rather than Ludwzgza, and Evonymus, L., instead of Huonymus. They also use Potentilla Tabernemontanz, Asch., instead of P. verna, L.; but the older name is P. mznxor, Gilib., although that perhaps is used in an ageregate sense. They are correct in using P. erecta, Hampe, instead of P. sylvestris, Neck., which Rendle and Britten employ, and also show that if Galzwm sylvestre, Pollich, is to be rejected, it must be called G. asperum, Schreber, and not G. umbellatum, Lam.; but I have yet to be convinced that G. sylvestre, Scop., is a Galzwim—the description does not suggest it, and no one, I believe, has yet identified it. They also point out that the authority of Avagalles tenella is Murray and not Lightfoot, and that Scrophularia alata, Gilib., has priority over S. wmbrosa, Dum. We are also indebted to them for vindicating the use of the name Veronzca Tournefortiz, Gmelin, instead of V. Buabaumi. F. W. Schmidt used V. Tourneforti in 1791, but it is a synonym of V. pectenata ; therefore V. Zournefortiz, Gmel., 1805, is available, and pre- cedes V. Buxbaumzi,Ten. They also reject Mr. Robinson’s re- versal of the names of Oxzales stricta and O. corniculata. Dr. Janchen tells me that the Orchzs montana, Schmidt, 1794, was only a large form of Habenaria bifolia and not the plant familiar to us as 1. chlorantha, Bab. Since there is an earlier H. chlorantha than that of Babington it would appear that we must use //. virescens (Zollik) for that species, since Zollik’s specific name vzrescens dates from Gaudin’s “ Flora Helvetica” (1829) and is therefore earlier than 1. chloroleuca, Ridley. The Continental authorities chiefly use Platanthera for the generic name instead of Hadenarza. The wider question of the advisability of following the Vienna “ Actes” when they depart from the Rule of Priority must not be touched on here, although it demands most serious attention, and I for one cannot assent to such an unfair and illogical practice. ZOOLOGICAL NOTES. Mr. Norman B. Kinnear.—Our friend and valued contributor, Mr. Norman B. Kinnear, has been offered, and has accepted, the Keepership of the Museum of the Bombay Natural History Society, ZOOLOGICAL NOTES 245 and will proceed to India in October to take up the appointment. The Society was founded in 1883, and now its members number some 1200, resident in all parts of Indiaand Burma. By the excel- lence of its work and the value of its publications it has become one of the leading societies of its kind in the East, and has earned and received the generous recognition of the Government of Bombay. During the quarter of a century it has existed the Society has amassed very considerable and valuable collections from all parts of the Indian Empire. Mr. Kinnear, who is a keen and promising zoologist, is a great-grandson of that distinguished naturalist, the late Sir William Jardine, Bart. The Editors of the “Annals,” while much regretting the loss Scottish Natural History sustains, extend to Mr. Kinnear their best wishes for a career of usefulness and distinction in his new sphere of activity. Hedgehog in Argyll.—In view of the remarks on this subject in Messrs. Harvie-Brown and Buckley’s “Vertebrate Fauna of Argyll and the Inner Hebrides ” (1892), the following extracts from my diary during a visit to Ballachulish in 1893 may be of some interest as supplementing the occurrences which have since been recorded in this Magazine (see “ Annals,” 1901, p. 233; and 1902, pp. 50 and 117). “29th August.—Mrs. Campbell” (wife of Dr. Campbell, who was, I believe, lessee of the Ballachulish quarries) “showed me a Hedgehog found by her gardener on the hillside near their house.” “ 1s¢ September.—I saw the gardener, who stated that it was the first he had seen in the locality, and that a man at the quarries said he had not heard of one being seen in the neigh- bourhood for quite ten years. On the same day we saw a Mole.” —A. HoLtTrE MacpHerson, London, W. Great Grey Seal in the Firth of Forth.—Perhaps it might interest your readers to know that on the afternoon of 27th July I saw, in the bay to the north-west of Rossend Castle, Burntisland, a Great Grey Seal (Halicherus gryphus). Ut was not over 60 yards from the shore, and I could quite easily identify it by its size, shape of the head and neck, and grey colour of the skin. It came up twice, and I had it under observation on its reappearance the second time very particularly. Being seated in the 1.35 train from Edinburgh, which had only drawn up waiting the signal to enter Burntisland Station, I had no opportunity of seeing where it eventually went to. I pointed it out to the occupants of the carriage, and they remarked on its large size. Being a native of the county of Orkney, and thus quite familiar with the appearance of these seals in the water, I had not the slightest hesitation in identifying the animal. Is not this a rather unusual occurrence in a busy waterway like the Forth ?—F. SEaTrer. 246 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY Interesting Birds at Fair Isle. —I have just returned from a five weeks’ residence on Fair Isle, where in the course of my investiga- tions I witnessed the passage movements of no less than 82 species of migratory birds. Among the birds observed were several species of special interest (some of them being new to Scotland), and these I propose to mention in this preliminary note, reserving full parti- culars for a future contribution on the results of the year’s observa- tions. The rarer species that came under my notice during September and the early days of October were—Black-throated Chat (Saxzcola occidentalis), Black-headed Bunting (Zmdberiza melanocephala), Grey- headed Wagtail (AZotacilla viridis), Red-breasted Flycatcher (JZusce- capa parva), Greater Redpoll (Acanthis rostrata), Ortolan Bunting (Eméeriza hortulana), Lapland Bunting (Catarius lapponicus), and Hoopoe (Upupa epops).—W™n. EAGLE CLARKE. Peculiar Blackbird’s Eggs and their Significanee.—The following record relating to several peculiar clutches of Blackbird’s eggs seems to prove that, in cases where the eggs of birds of one species are subject to variation, each individual female of that species lays year after year eggs similar in colour and markings. Early in April 1903 I found a Blackbird’s nest containing three pure blue eggs, but these were taken before the clutch was complete. On roth April 1905, within a few yards of the same spot, I again found a Blackbird’s nest, presumably belonging to the same bird, as it contained two pure blue eggs and a third of ordinary Blackbird’s-egg type. This nest was also robbed before the clutch was complete, but by 26th April a new nest had been constructed close by the old one, and two eggs had .been laid, both pure blue in colour. On 3oth April, when I again looked at the nest, the bird was sitting closely on a clutch of three eggs, one of which, the last laid, was of ordinary markings. Again the nest was robbed, and again, on 1oth May, I found the bird sitting on another nest, which contained a clutch of eggs similar to that found on 30th April. The next nestful of these peculiar eggs which I found was dis- covered on 8th April 1906, and consisted of two unspotted eggs: on goth April the number remained the same, but a pure blue egg was found on the ground a few yards away; this egg I placed in the nest, which, however, proved to be deserted. This year I did not find the unspotted Blackbird’s eggs until 28th June, when I found a deserted clutch in a nest built about 50 yards from the former sites. This clutch consisted of five eggs: four blue and unspotted, and the fifth of ordinary markings. It is, of course, impossible to prove from the above scanty observations that all these nests belonged to the same pair of birds ; yet, as, with the exception of the 1907 nest, all were built within a space of about roo square yards, it is quite probable that they did. ale i gt i eh ee ZOOLOGICAL NOTES 247 A gardener who had been at work near the last-mentioned nest declared to me that it belonged to a pair of birds of which the male was a pied specimen, as he had several times seen the bird near the nest ; but as the nest was deserted when I first saw it, and the eggs were taken two days later, I was unable to make any personal observations on this point. If the gardener’s statement could but be satisfactorily proven, it would form a record of unusual interest.—WILLIAM BINNIE, Aberdeen. Unusual Situation of Willow-Wren’s Nest.—During the past nesting-season I came across a Willow-Wren’s nest in a very unex- pected position, viz. on the extremity of the drooping branch of a spruce, fully nine feet above the ground. ‘The locality in which this nest was found is a rather damp, low-lying patch of woodland ; which fact, in conjunction with the inclemency of the season, may account for,the bird’s unusual choice of a nesting-place.—S. FE. Brock, Kirkliston. Redstart in Mull.—In regard to the distribution of the Red- start (Aeuticilla pPhenicurus) in the Hebrides, it should, in view of doubts to the contrary, be stated tnat in this portion of the Inner Hebrides the species is a fairly common summer visitor.— D. Macpona.p, Tobermory. Pied Flycatcher in Ayrshire.—I think it may interest you to know that we have had a Pied Flycatcher (AZuscicapa atricapilla) breeding here. The nest was in a small hollow on the bole of an old acacia tree about 4 feet from the ground. The young birds were hatched out all right, and all seemed to be going well, when either the bird itself or another started to build a second nest on the top of them, and they were all smothered—a catastrophe I cannot account for.—Mary Younc, Glendoune. Great Spotted Woodpecker nesting in Perthshire.—In con- nection with the extension of range of this species as a native bird in Scotland, which is being discussed in the pages of the ‘ Annals,” it will be of interest to record that I have received reliable informa- tion of its nesting both at Crieff and Drumtochty in May last.— Mary BeEprorpD, Meikleour, Perthshire. Great Spotted Woodpecker nesting near Callander, Perth- shire.—This spring my daughter discovered that we had the Great Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopus major) in this neighbourhood. In June she watched a pair of these birds carrying lichens in their beaks and depositing them in a small hole in an alder, so that there can be no doubt they are nesting with us.—J. B. BaiLure HamiLton, Callander. Albino Shag in Mull.—On r4th and 15th June I visited a bird colony established within recent years at Rhu-na-Caillich, in the extreme N.W. of Mull. While there I was assured by Mr. Alex. 248 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY Mitchell, lessee of the salmon fishings, that a wholly white Shag (Phalacrocorax graculus) was seen near there a few days previous to my visit. On 18th July I was informed by four Staffa boatmen that they had that morning passed close to a Shag which was com- pletely white. All my informants were unanimous that the bird was a Shag, and that a similarly coloured bird had never before been observed by them.—D. Macpona.p, Tobermory. Little Bittern in Inverness-shire.—It may be of interest to your readers to know that I found a Little Bittern (A7detta minuta), a female, at Lentran station, six miles from Inverness, on the gth of June. The bird was alive, but one wing was broken, it having evidently come in contact with the telegraph wires.—Wwm. MILNE, Inverness. [The Little Bittern is of rare occurrence in Scotland, and has not hitherto been known to visit the Moray area.—Eps. | Nesting of the Quail in East Lothian.—Learning that a strange note had been repeatedly heard by the field-workers at Saltoun East Mains farm on 3rd June in the young corn and grass fields, I went out on the morning of 5th and heard the unmistakable dactylic cry of the Quail (Coturnix coturnix). There seemed.to be three calling males in the grass field that day. After this the call was heard almost daily in four different fields for at least a fortnight. I managed to see a bird once, in a spot where the hay grew thinly, and another time I surprised one feeding in the middle of the road, as I came along quietly on my bicycle. Its alarm cry was exactly like that of a partridge, though not quite so strong. ‘The hay-field where I first heard the birds calling was cut on 17th July, but in spite of vigilance and precautions following on my interest in the matter, the nest was not found till the horse-rakes had dragged a great swathe of hay over it. I found one egg close beside the empty nest, and other five some ten yards off, all broken, containing chicks on which the down had begun to form. Possibly there had been more eggs than these, but I could only find the six.—H. N. Bonar, Saltoun. [Introduced Quails were put down in Stirlingshire, remained some time, but disappeared.—J. A. H.-B.] Garganey in Aberdeenshire.—On the roth of November 1906 we saw a Garganey (Querquedula circia) at the mouth of the Don. It allowed us to get very close to it, and, although it kept itself partially submerged while we were near it, we were able to identify it by the light streak over the eye. We also found its footmarks on the sand, and had a distant view of the whole bird before it swam off and submerged itself. According to Mr. Sim, the only record for this district was also for the autumn migration season (22nd October 1898).—A. L. THomson and L. N. G. Ramsay, Aberdeen. ZOOLOGICAL NOTES 249 Tufted Duck nesting in West Lothian.—With reference to Mr. Brock’s notice in the July number of the “ Annals,” I may state that I have known the Tufted Duck to nest regularly in the eastern portion of West Lothian during the last ten years.—BRUCE CAMPBELL, Edinburgh. Dotterel in Mull.—On the roth of May I accompanied a friend in a climb to view the grand panorama to be seen from the summit of one of the mountains of N.W. Mull. ‘The sight was very grand, but to me a more interesting one was in store, for my eye caught sight of a plover-liké bird, and within a few feet of it its brighter- coloured mate—a pair of Dotterels (Zzdromias morinellus). We had our binoculars, but there was little need for them, as the birds were so confiding as to permit our approach to within ten yards of them. During the hour we watched them they were engaged seek- ing insects, which they found among the coarse herbage on the hill- top. They were never more than a few yards apart while thus engaged, as each bird would move three or four feet, pick up an insect, stand for a second or two, and then repeat the process. I visited the scene again on the 24th, but, as I expected, both birds had taken their departure—D. Macpona_p, Tobermory. Woodeoeks in Dumfriesshire.—Of recent years the nesting of Woodcocks in this locality has become more and more frequent. Their nests are to be found in woods and coverts, and in the spring at twilight Woodcocks may be seen “roding” up and down the sides and edges of the coverts. In June and July the broods, accom- panied by their parents, may be flushed in the more open parts of the woods. In August they seem to have left the woods and taken refuge in the great stretches of bracken, which grows here in some places to the height of four or five feet. Such patches of cover, if near a wood, may be almost counted on to hold a Woodcock. This season (1907) they have been more than usually plentiful, and already (1st September) many have been shot. On 17th August five couple were shot while walking up grouse. It was noticed that they were usually flushed at the edge of a clump of brackens, and that where one was flushed another Woodcock was nearly certain to be within thirty yards; but never were two birds flushed at a time, so close did they lie. When on the wing they flew ‘like owls,” in a dull, heavy, direct way, very different from their autumnal zigzag flight in the coverts. On three or four occasions we saw, say at a hundred yards in front of us, one of these birds flutter up out of the bracken and settle down again a few feet off. This happened presumably when the bird wished to move and was unable to do so on foot because of the too dense undergrowth of heather or dead bracken. It would be interesting to know if this increase in numbers of Woodcock is general throughout Scotland this season.—Hucu S. GLADSTONE, Capenoch, Thornhill, Dumfriesshire. 250 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY Black-tailed Godwit in Barra.—On her return from the north of the Long Island, Her Grace the Duchess of Bedford shot a Black-tailed Godwit at Eoligary, Barra, which will be preserved and find a resting-place in the collection of local birds formed by the Messrs. MacGillivray of Eoligary. It was shot by her on 7th September 1907. Her Grace perfectly identified the bird before it was shot, and I am informed of the above facts by Mr. Wm. MacGillivray zz @¢. toth September 1907, with the additional information that so far as he, Mr. MacGillivray, is aware, ‘‘this is the first record of the species for Barra.” —J. A. HARVIE-BRown. Black-throated Diver on the Aberdeenshire Coast.—On the 3oth of January 1907 a Black-throated Diver (Colymdbus arcticus) was shot at the mouth of the Don; it is now in Marischal College Museum. Mr. Sim (“Vertebrate Fauna of Dee”) said in 1903 that he had had only one specimen through his hands in forty years ; thus, although there has been another since, it seems to be very rare in this district.—A. LANDSBOROUGH THomson, Aberdeen. The House Cricket (Gry//us domesticus) in an old Quarry near Edinburgh.—One associates the House Cricket so entirely with ovens and fireplaces, that I was almost incredulous when my son told me he heard dozens “chirping” in an old quarry west of Slateford, near Edinburgh, on the evening of 25th June last. On 2oth July he heard them again, and this time brought home three in support of his statement. I then visited the place myself, and found the insects quite numerous, and at all stages from newly hatched young to full-sized adults. They were living under a layer of rubbish, including pieces of old furs, corsets, the stuffing of chairs, tin cans, etc., that had been from time to time deposited in the quarry. No doubt the crickets have been introduced into the quarry with some of the rubbish, and it will be interesting to see if the colony survives the winter in the open.—WILLIAM Evans, Edinburgh. False-Seorpions of the West of Scotland.—Since writing my note for the July “ Annals” I have detected two other species in the West of Scotland. Chetridium museorum (Leach) has been obtained in the two widely separated counties of Ayr and Ross. In the former county a number of specimens were taken by myself in a meal-mill at Dalry on 29th June, and in the latter a single adult was discovered by Mr. G, A. White in a hay-barn at Balmacara on 26th August. This species builds nests for the various purposes of moulting, reproduction, and resting. But it differs to some extent in its re- productive habits from our other Scottish species. Sometimes the female follows the course adopted by Odzscam and Chthonius of shut- ting herself inside her nest and retaining her embryo mass attached to ZOOLOGICAL NOTES 251 her genital pore during the period occupied by the embryonic changes ; but at other times she apparently lays a few eggs inside a nest and allows them to develop without her presence in the nest at all. This latter method is so startling that I have diffidence in publishing the fact; but in June 1905 I obtained such nests with eggs in my own house in Edinburgh, and in the spring of 1907 Mr. G. A. Whyte obtained strongly confirmatory evidence by finding nests containing several young that had attained their definitive form and were unaccompanied by the female. Chelifer rufeolus, Simon.—On 28th June I obtained three im- mature individuals of this species—the first Scottish examples—from a stable loft in Walls Street, Glasgow ; and in the month of August Messrs. Whyte and I discovered it commonly at Balmacara, where we took eighty specimens from a small byre. In the Glasgow stable the moulting nests were found on wood and in a clotted mass of straw ; and in the byre at Balmacara a female carrying her embryonic mass was shaken out of some refuse on 24th August. The synonymy of this species is not yet finally settled, and it is possible that in the future another name will be substituted for that used here. Two records made this summer of species already referred to in the July “Annals” deserve notice. Chelifer cancroides (Linn.) has been discovered in a second Glasgow stable ; and Od/stum maritimum, Leach, has been obtained on the shore of Loch Duich, near Balmacara.— ROBERT GODFREY. BOTANICAL NOTES AND NEWS. Juneus balticus, W7//d., away from the Sea-Coast.—This plant is given in works on the British flora as found ‘in sandy places near the sea, or rarely by inland lakes.” The only locality under the latter head is, or rather was, the Loch of Drum or Park in the valley of the Dee, about twelve miles inland. It now seems to be extinct at this place; at least it has not been found there for some years. In August of this year, while residing at Aviemore in East Inverness-shire, I walked from the railway station of Daviot by Moy and Tomatin to Carr Bridge. Between the two last places the road crosses a range of hills; and although it passes through a ravine known as the Slochd Mor, it reaches a height of 1327 feet above sea-level. Near a milestone marked “Carrbridge 64” miles, where the altitude must approach 1300 feet, grow several clumps of J. balticus. Two or three of these are some feet across, and of vigorous growth, so that the conditions appear to be very favourable despite the altitude and the distance from the sea-coast. Even the upper end of the Moray Firth is nearly twenty miles away ; and the open sea is considerably more distant.—James W. H. TRalt. 252 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY Mite-Galls on the Beech (/agus sylvatica) in Seotland.—In August I found in Rothiemurchus several forms of growth on the leaves of beech trees, which were due to the action of microscopic mites of the group £rzophyide, formerly known as Phytoptide. The most frequent was the form once regarded as a fungus, under the name of L77neum fagzneum, Persoon, consisting of patches on the lower surface of the leaves covered with short clubbed hairs. I have seen these patches in various parts of Scotland, from Dumfries north- wards, but always of a pale colour, or at most becoming pale rusty brown. The red variety, described from the Continent of Europe, has not been seen by me in Scotland. On a few trees in Rothiemurchus, and on one by the Findhorn near Relugas, I met with leaves bearing similar pale hairs on the upper surface in narrow belts along the chief veins, the so-called Lrineum nervisequum, Kunze. These sometimes occurred on the same leaves as £. fagineum, but usually there appeared to be little connection between them. They are both attributed to Lriophyes nervisequus, Can. On a few other trees the leaves were still more markedly altered, being thickened in texture, permanently folded along the veins, and covered with hairs, which early become pale brown. The leaves remain small and useless to the plant. Usually the two or three terminal leaves of a shoot are entirely altered, while the lower ones show no sign of injury. One or two trees showed many branches affected, while others had few attacked. I have seen this gall only rarely before in Aberdeenshire and Perthshire, and at Kew, near London. All the examples that I have found have been dry and vacated by the makers. It has been attributed to Zvzophyes stenasfts, Nalepa ; but the gall characteristic of this mite is a rolling of the leaf- margins into narrow tubes more or less filled with hairs, known as Legnon circumscriptum, Bremi. ‘This latter gall I have found in Dumfries and elsewhere in Scotland, but not frequently, and never associated with the plicate leaves. I looked without success for the rolled leaf-margins on the trees that bore the other form ; and I did not see them in the valley of the Spey this autumn. As the Beech is itself a comparatively recent introduction into Scotland from the continent of Europe, its galls must have been introduced with young trees.—James W. H. TRat. Galled Flowers of Field Gentian (Gentiana campestris, L.).—I had occasionally observed in former years distorted and swollen flowers on the Gentian in the valley of the Dee, e.g. in Braemar and near Dinnet, but had not had the fitting opportunity to examine these closely, hence I was glad to use the opportunity to do so pre- sented by finding such flowers rather plentifully in August in various places in Rothiemurchus, in Abernethy, Cromdale, and elsewhere near the Spey. The plants showed a tendency to be badly affected in ee ee BOTANICAL NOTES AND NEWS 253 limited areas, and to remain free from the attack in other places a little way off from infested spots. Only the flowers showed signs of injury. They remained closed, but much swollen, and the purplish colour of the corolla was often very evident, though in other examples the green alone was visible. The parts of the flower become much swollen, and so distorted as to be useless for their proper functions, the stamens often bearing no pollen ; while the ovary becomes inflated, and, bursting down one side, displays a smaller flower of like structure, the ovary of which may show even a third flower from its interior. Among the distorted organs of the flowers were numbers of the cause of injury, the mite L7zophyes Kerneri, Nalepan—James W. H. TRAIL, A New Variety of the Lesser Broomrape (Ovobanche minor, Sm.) in Seotland.—When in Scotland in August I had the pleasure of finding near Cupar, Fife, some specimens of a very dark-coloured Orobanche, which I could not name. I sent it to Mr. Claridge Druce, who said he believed it to be an unusual variety of O. minor, a plant very rarely found in Scotland,! and advised me to send it to Professor Von Beck of Prague, who is writing a monograph on the Orobanchacee. I did so, and I now forward a translation of the Professor’s very interesting reply :—‘‘ Botanic Garden and Institute of the Imperial German University, Prague, 4th September 1907.— Honoured Madam—I thank you sincerely for your kindness in sending the Ovobanche, which is indeed an unusual form of O. minor. I had not seen it before, and I recognise it as forma conciliata,— Corolla excepta basi alba amethystino-violacea, squamz calycis cum cauli purpurascentes. It is very interesting that other Ovobanches found in Scotland are also of a darker colour, as is the case with O. rubra, Hook.” —M. C. Murray. CURRENT LITERATURE. The Titles and Purport of Papers and Notes relating to Scottish Natural History which have appeared during the Quarter—July-September 1907. (The Editors desire assistance to enable them to make this Section as complete as possible. Contributions on the lines indicated will be most acceptable, and will bear the initials of the Contributor. The Editors will have access to the sources of information undermentioned. ] ZOOLOGY. THE CRESTED TIT IN ScoTLanp. “Lichen Grey.” Zhe Field, roth August 1907; P. 249.—A short article, describing the nesting and other habits of the species, with a note on its distribution. 1 Only in Fifeshire (85), where it has been suggested that it was introduced probably with agricultural seeds (Ed. ‘*‘ A.S.N.H.”). 254 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY NESTING OF THE SCOTER IN SUTHERLAND. C. H. T. White- head. Zhe Meld, 13th July 1907, p. 53, and 31st August 1907, p. 435.—Nest with six young and two eggs found towards end of June near the edge of an inland loch, and another brood a few days later swimming with the mother in a small tarn. SoME NOreEsS ON THE LEPIDOPTERA OF THE “ DALE COLLECTION ” oF BritisH INSECTS, NOW IN THE OXFORD UNIVERSITY MUSEUM (continued). James J. Walker, M.A., R.N., F.L.S. nt. Mo. Mag., July 1907, pp. 154-158.—Reference made to a series of Zygzena exulans from Braemar; specimens of Sphinx pinastri taken by Dr. Leach near Edinburgh and by Mr. Wilson, in 1818, in ‘“ Ravelston Wood, near Edinburgh” ; and four examples of Sesia scolizeformis from Rannoch. NOTES ON THE GENUS CRYPTOPHAGUS, WITH A TABLE OF SPECIES. Arthur J. Chitty. £z¢. Mo. Mag., July-August 1907, pp. 164- 171.—C. fumatus taken at Forres and C. cylindrus mentioned as occurring in the North of Scotland. ON THE BRACONIDOUS CRYPTOGASTRES. Claude Morley, F.E.S. Entomologist, August 1907, pp. 179-184.—Acrogaster rufipes re- corded from Aberdeenshire, and A. quadridentatus from Nairn. HYPOPHYLLUS CRINIPES, STAEG., IN THE ForTH DistRICT. A. E. J. Carter. Zz. Mo. Mag., July 1907, p. 160.—One male and two females taken at Musselburgh. On soME BriTisH Potyzoa. Canon A. M. Norman, M.A., etc. Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist, September 1907, pp. 207-212, plate ixx—Terebripora ditrupze, sf. 2., described from specimens obtained off Shetland. Schizoporella alderi and Phylactella pygmza are also recorded from Shetland. ON THE OCCURRENCE OF A SUPPOSED AUSTRALASIAN HyDROID (SERTULARIA ELONGATA) IN THE NorTH SEA. James Ritchie, M.A., B.Sc. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc., vol. xvii. No. 2 (March 1907), pp. 78- 80.—A cluster of colonies found in the net of a trawler which had been working off the Shetland Isles and off Buchan Ness. The author comes to the conclusion that the specimen drifted from an Australasian, perhaps from a West Australian locality, to the spot where it was picked up. THE ATRACTYLIS COCCINEA OF T. S. WricHT. G.S. Russell, M.A. Ann. and. Mag. Nat. Hist., July 1907, pp. 52-55, and figure.—Redescribes the species, and refers to specimens obtained in the Firths of Forth and Clyde. History OF THE LocH-AN-EILEIN Ospreys. C. G. Cash. Cairngorm Club Journal, July 1907, pp. 270-278.—Give chrono- logical notes gathered from various sources and from _ personal observations extending from the year 1804 to 1902. Information regarding Loch Morlich, Glenmore, is also given. CURRENT LITERATURE 255 BOTANY. HYBRIDS AMONG BRITISH PHANEROGAMS. By Rev. E. F. Linton, M.A. Journ. Bot., 1907, pp. 268-276, 296-304.—A catalogue with notes of all known to the author. The ferns and allies are also included, despite the title of the paper. PLANTS OF E. PERTH AND S. ABERDEEN. By Rev. E. S. Marshall, M.A., F.L.S., and W. A. Shoolbred, F.L.S. /ourn. Lot., 1907, pp. 292-296.—Several new to each district are mentioned in the critical genera, e.g., Hieracium. On THE DISAPPEARANCE OF CryptoGaMic Puants. By A. R. Horwood. Journ. Bot., 1907, pp. 334-339.—Relates to Leicester- shire especially, but gives valuable notes on effects of industrial works on these plants, the gases proving harmful. Norres oN BritisH Hepatic&. By Symers M. Macvicar. Journ. Bot., 1907, pp. 258-262.—Several species and varieties discussed, either new to Britain or of critical importance. New Loca.LitTies OF RaReE LicHENS. By A. Lorrain Smith. Journ. Bot. 1907, p. 345.— Names Ffertusaria gyrocheila from Harris and Ramalna Curnow from Lewis. GALL FORMATION ON Ramatina. By A. Lorrain Smith. Journ. Bot., 1907, pp. 344-345.—Thalli deformed and showing cavities tenanted by mites. 2. cuspidata, var. crassa, from North-East Scotland, is one of the forms named as bearing the galls. BOOK NOTICES. Tue LETTERS TO GILBERT WHITE OF SELBORNE FROM HIS INTIMATE FRIEND AND CONTEMPORARY THE ReEv. JOHN MULSO. Edited with Notes and Introduction by Rashleigh Holt-White, M.A. London: R. H. Porter. This volume contains a series of 229 letters addressed to Gilbert White between the years 1744 and 1790. ‘That these should have been carefully preserved by their distinguished recipient is no small recommendation, and will appeal to many who revere all things associated with White’s memory. The letters relate to a great variety of subjects, many of them of current interest at the time they were penned ; but it must be said that the allusions to natural history are few and of little consequence. We are able to gather from them, however, some knowledge of subjects and persons in which White was evidently interested other than Natural History and naturalists, and this is undoubtedly their chief value. On the other hand, a perusal of them does not lead one to 256 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY form a high opinion of their author, but the fact remains that, what- ever his faults, he was Gilbert White’s oldest and most intimate friend, and one for whom he evidently had great regard. Mulso seems to have been a far-seeing man, for, writing in 1776, he says of the Natural History of Selborne: “ Your work, upon the whole, will immortalize your place of abode as well as yourself, it will correct men’s principles; and give health to those who chuse to visit the scenes of Mr. Grimm’s pencil, in their original” : prophetic words. The introduction affords information of interest anent the Mulso family and the friendly relations existing between its members and the Selborne naturalist. REPORT ON THE IMMIGRATIONS OF SUMMER RESIDENTS IN THE, SPRING OF 1906. By the Committee appointed by the British Ornithologists’ Club. London: Witherby & Co., 1907. Price 6s. This is the Second Report issued by the Committee, and like the last deals solely with the arrival of Summer birds on the English coasts, their dispersal to accustomed English nesting haunts, and their passage movements to beyond the area, so far as it may be possible to detect them. It contains a considerable amount of information on the dates of arrival on great stretches of coast-line and from wide inland areas, and may be studied with advantage in conjunction with Mr. Paterson’s Report on the Scottish movements. As these English investigations of the Club are still in their infancy, it would be well to desist from drawing useless and misleading deductions from the data at present obtained, and to reserve for some future Report a final and authoritative pronouncement based upon the necessary adequate material. Tue Insect Hunter’s Companion. By the Rev. Joseph Greene, M.A. Fifth edition, revised and extended by A. B. Farn. London: West, Newman and Co., 1907. Price 1s. 6d. net. This little book is an old friend in a new garb. The text is practically the same as in the older editions, but the typography and paper are improved, and the book is bound in a neat green gilt- lettered cover. Although it was written so many years ago, we venture to think that this little work will still hold its own amid the many larger and more up-to-date handbooks. For the schoolboy or novice it is an agreeable and useful fulfilment of its title, and can be conveniently carried in the pocket and even taken into the field. INDEX Acherontia atropos in Roxburghshire (Curr. Lit.), 58 Aculeate Hymenoptera in Perthshire (Curr. Lit.), 58 Alien Plants, 37 ALSTON, CHARLES H., Probable occur- rence of the Great Spotted Wood- pecker in Loch Awe District, 182 ANDERSON, PETER, Rush of Golden Plover at Tiree, 117 ; Swans in the Outer Hebrides, 183 Anurida maritima and (Curr) Lit. ); 124 Afpera intermedia as an Alien in Britain, 170 Arthrostraca, some, and other Inverte- brates from St. Kilda, 219 Aspicilia Lilltec, a new species of Lichen, 121, 125 Atractylis coccinea in Forth and Clyde (Curr. Lit.), 254 its enemies BARTHOLOMEW, JAMES, Pintail in Clyde Area, 182 BAXTER, EVELYN V., and RINTOUL, Leonora J., Albino Brambling in Fife, 50 BEDFORD, Her Grace the Duchess of, Great Spotted Woodpecker nest- ing in Perthshire, 247 BEEBY, WILLIAM H., F.L.S., On the Flora of Shetland, 164 BENNETT, ARTHUR, F.L.S., Butomus umbellatus in Caithness, 103; Potamogeton undulatus in Scot- land, 104; Potamogeton Macvicarit, 106; The Plants of the Flannan Islands, 187 BINNIE, WILLIAM, Peculiar Blackbird’s Eggs and their Significance, 246 Bird-Life as observed at Skerryvore Lighthouse, 20 Bird-Notes from Shetland, 49 Bird-Notes from North Shetland for 1906, 50 Bird-Notes from the Solway District, 112 64 Bird-Notes from Thornhill, Dumfries- shire, 113 Birds added to Perth Museum, 184 Birds of Fair Isle in 1906, 65; in 1907, 245 Birds seen in Outer Hebrides during the spring of 1906, 16, 81 Bittern, Little, in Inverness-shire, 248 BoNAR,, Rev. Hi, N.; B:Z:S:, Caper- caillie in Midlothian, 51 ; Nesting of Quail in East Lothian, 248 Book Notices :—Eggs of the Birds of Europe, by H. E. Dresser, 60 ; Cambridge Natural Flistory (Proto- zoa, Porifera, Coelenterata, Cteno- phora, Echinodermata), 61; The Recreations of a Naturalist, by James Edmund Harting, 62; British Flowering Plants, and How to Find and Name Wild Flowers, 63; I go a-walking through the Woods and o’er the Moor, 64; Ootheca Wolleyana, edited by Alfred Newton, Part IV., 125; The Aquatic Birds of Great Britain and Ireland, by Prof. C. J. Patten, 126; A Natural History of British Butterflies, by J. W. Tutt, 127; The British Tunicates, by Alder and Hancock, edited by John Hopkinson, 128; Illustrated Hand- book to the Perth Museum, by Alex. M. Rodger, 128; The British Warblers) | Panty bye dl. Howard, 191; Bird-Life of the Borders, by Abel Chapman, Io1 ; European Animals: their Geo- logical and Geographical Distribu- tion, by R. F. Scharff, 192 ; The Letters of John Mulso to Gilbert White, edited by Rashleigh Holte- White, 255; Report on the Im- migration of Summer Residents in 1906, 256; The Insect Hunter’s Companion, by the late Joseph Green, 256 F 258 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY Botanical Nomenclature, 55 Braconidous Cryptogastres, (Curr. Lit.), 254 Brambling, Albino, in Fife, 50 Brambling in West Ross-shire, 114 Bream (Black Sea-) in the Firth of Forth, 148 Brock, SyDNEY E., Tufted Duck in West Lothian, 185 ; Unusual Situa- tion of Willow Warbler’s Nest, 247 Broomrape, Lesser, New Variety of, 253 BUCHAN-HEPBURN, Sir A., Bart., Hawfinch in East Lothian, 181 Bunting, Rustic, in Aberdeenshire, 114 Bunting, Snow, nesting in Aberdeen- shire, 115, 185 3uRN-MurbocH, A., Miiller’s Top- knot in the Sound of Mull, 53 Butomus umbellatus in Caithness, 103 Scottish CAMERON, PETER, On the Scottish Species of Oxyura (Proctotrypidz), 31, 158; Scottish Cryptinze (Ichneumonidz), 88 ; Hymenop- terological Notes, 221 CAMPBELL, BrucE, White - beaked Dolphin in the Firth of Forth, 65 ; Tufted Duck nesting in West Lothian, 249 Capercaillie in Midlothian, 51; in Dumfriesshire, 52 ; in Moray, 52; in the South of Scotland, 116 Capercaillie hen in male plumage, 117 Capercaillie and Willow Grouse in Moray, 116 Carex muricata in North Aberdeen, 55 Carida affinis in Strathspey (Curr. Lit.), Centrolophus niger on the Scottish Coast, with note on points of Structure, 216 Cherocampa celerio at Galashiels, 55 Chrysops sepulcralis at Aberfoyle, 54 CiarKE, E. T., Rustic Bunting in Aberdeenshire, 114; Nesting of Snow Bunting in Aberdeenshire, 115; Snowy Owl in Perthshire, 115; Hen Capercaillie in Male Plumage, 117 CLARICn. WetAGIE BAR Sak Welenoss Occurrence of the Siberian Chiff- Chaff in Scotland: a new Bird to the British Fanua, 15 ; Dotterel at the Flannan Islands, 53; Birds of Fair Isle in 1906, 66; Supposed occurrence of the Yellow-shanked Sandpiper near Hawick, 118; Rare Birds at Fair Isle, 245 Coenogoniacez, British (Curr. Lit.), 59 Coleoptera in Inverness-shire (Curr. Lit.) 58 Coleoptera in 1906 (Curr. Lit.), 123 Conodonts, occurrence of in S. Scot- land (Curr. Lit.), 123 Copepoda, New and Rare Scottish (Curr. Lit.), 124 CorBetT, Epwarp M., American Wigeon in Benbecula, 116 Crabro carbonartus in S. Scotland (Curr. Irie) Gye: Crake, Spotted, in Lewis (Curr. Lit.), Cricket, House, in old Quarry near Edinburgh, 250 Crows, Hooded and Carrion, in Scot- land (Curr. Lit.), 123 Crustacea of the Forth Area (Curr. Lit.), 59 Cryptinze, Contribution towards Know- ledge of Scottish, 88 Cryptophagus fumatus and C, cylindrus in North of Scotland (Curr. Lit.), 254 4 Cystopteris fragilis, var. sempervirens (Curr. Lit.), 59 DAVIDSON, JAMES, F.Z.S., Capercail- lies in Moray, 52 DEWAR, THOMAS F., M.D., D.Sc., Lesser Whitethroat nesting in “Tay,” 185 Dipper, early nest of (Curr. Lit.), 18 Diptera in Dumbartonshire in 1906 (Curr. Lit.), 190 ; in Scotland in 1906 (Curr. Lit.), 190 Diptera of St. Kilda, 150 Diver, Black - throated, on the Aber- deenshire Coast, 250 Dolphin, Risso’s, in the Forth (Curr. Texte) 122 Dolphin, White-beaked, in Firth of Forth, 65 Dotterel at the Flannan Islands, 53 ; in Mull, 249 Dragon-Fly Seasons of 190s and 1906 (Curr. Lit.), 124 Dragonet, Gemmous, in Shetland Seas, 186 Druce, G. CLaripGE, M.A., F.L.S., Notes on the Flora of Berwick- shire, 96; Heeractum nigrescens, var. commutatum, on Ben Heas- garnich, Mid Perth, 122; Nom- enclature of British Plants, 241 Duck, Tufted, in West Lothian, 185, 249 Eggs, peculiar Blackbird’s, and their significance, 246 Empis hyalitennis in Dumbartonshire, (Curr. Lit.), 57 Eristalis tenax, early appearance of, 186 INDEX 259 EVANS, WILLIAM, F.R.S.E., Some Scottish Ixodidz (Ticks), 34; Chrysops sepulcralis, Therioplectes montanus, and other Tabanidee at Aberfoyle, 54; Phoxtchilidium Jemoratum from the Firth of Forth, 119; Premachilis hibernica m Scotland, 119; Some Pezomachi and other Cryptinz from ‘‘ Forth,” 120; Altitudinal Range of U¢r7- cularta minor, 122; Black Sea- Bream (Cantharus cantharus) in the Firth of Forth, 148 ; Smew in ““Forth,’ 183; A New Louse (Heematopinus ovillus) from the Sheep, 225; The House Cricket in an old Quarry near Edinburgh, 250 Fair Isle, Birds of, in 1906, 65; in 1907, 245 Falcon, Greenland, in Lewis (Curr. Lit.), 123; in Argyllshire (Curr. Lit.), 123 False-Scorpions of West of Scotland, 162, 250 Fauna of Galashiels and _ District (Curr. Lit.), 123 Flea, new British (Curr. Lit.), 124 Flora of Berwickshire, Notes on, 96 Flora of Cairnie Parish (Curr. Lit.), 124 Flora of St. Kilda, a Contribution to, 239 Flora of Shetland, 164 Flora of a Shingle Island in the River Orchy (Curr. Lit.), 190 Flycatcher, Pied, in Kirkcudbright, 183 ; in Ayrshire, 247 Flycatcher, Red-breasted, migration of, 51 Fow .er, ALAN A., Bramblings in West Ross-shire, 114 FRASER, JAMES, Alien Plants, 37 ; Triticum peregrinum, a new alien found near Edinburgh, 101 Foxes, Litter of Male, 180 Fulmar nesting at Dunnet Head, 53, 118 Galled Flowers of Field Gentian, 252 Garganey in Shetland, 182; Aberdeen- shire, 248 Godwit, Black-tailed, in Lanarkshire, 184; in Barra, 250 Gonatopus, Notes on Genus (Curr. Lit.), 190 Goose, Grey-Lag, in Ayrshire, 52 Gooseberry-Mildews, 109 GLADSTONE, Hueu S., M.A., F.Z.S., Capercaillie in Dumfriesshire, 52 ; Bird-Notes from Thornhill, Dum- friesshire, 113; Woodcock in Dumfriesshire, 249 Grebe, Great Crested, in Shetland in Winter, 117 GRIMSHAW, PERcy H., F.E.S., Chero- campa celerto at Galashiels, 55; On the Diptera of St. Kilda, 150; Hydrotea borussica, a Fly new to the British List, 223 GODFREY, RoperT, M.A., The False- Scorpions of the West of Scotland, 162 GUNNIS, FRANcIS G., F.Z.S., A Litter of Male Foxes, 180 GURNEY, (Jen Ee Bolens, H-Z.93, Migration of the Red - breasted Flycatcher, 51 IBUGROYAINID, IR (Ca, aS vac Whaling in Scotland, 10 HaMILtTon, J. B. BAILLIE, Great Spotted Woodpecker nesting near Callander, Perthshire, 247 Hare, Brown, Winter Whitening of (Cur wlits) 122 Harvie-Brown, J. A., F.R.S.E., EeZeSe.y Walds(@ats mites Nee Highlands, 49; Martens in N.W. Highlands, 111; Marked Starlings, 114; Pintail in Forth, 115; Ful- mar Petrels at Dunnet Head, 118 ; Spring Return of Woodcock in Forth and Clyde, 143; A Novel Method of Skinning Mammals and Birds, 180; Hawfinch in Upper Forth, 182; Great Spotted Wood- pecker in Forth and Tay, 182; Food of the Wood Pigeon, 183 ; Garden Warbler in Scotland, 184 ; Winter Movements of Woodcock, 184; Black-tailed Godwit in Barra, 250 Hematopinus ovillus, anew Louse from the Sheep, 225 Hawfinch in East Lothian, 181 ; Upper Forth, 182 Hedgehog in Argyll, 245 Heliozoa of Forth Area, 93 HENDERSON, THomAs, Jun., Grey Plover, Woodcock, and Great Crested Grebe in Shetland in Winter, 117 ; Gemmous Dragonet in Shetland Seas, 186 Hepatice, New and Rare (Curr. Lit.), 125 ; British, Notes on (Curr. Lit.), 255 Hepaticze, Scottish, Additions to Census for 1906, 45 Hewitt, C. Gorpon, M.Sc., Some Arthrostraca and other Inverte- brates from St. Kilda, 219; A Contribution to a Flora of St. Kilda: being a list of certain (Scot. ), 260 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY Lichens, Mosses, Hepaticz, and Fresh-water Algee, 239 Ffieractum, Notes on (Curr. Lit.), 125 fTieracium nigrescens, var.commutatum, in Mid Perth, 122 Hoopoe in Orkney (Curr. Lit.), 57 Hydrachnid Fauna of Scotland (Curr. Wits) 127. Hydroid, Supposed Australian, in North Sea (Curr. Lit.), 254 Flydrotea borussica, A Fly new to the British List, 223 Hymenopterological Notes, 221 Hy pophyllus crinipes in *‘ Forth” (Curr. eit) S220 Isopod, New British Terrestrial, 85 Ixodidz, Some Scottish, 34 JACKSON, A. BRUCE, Afera intermedia as an Alien in Britain, 170 JAcKson, Dororuy, Lepidoptera from East Ross-shire, 54 Juncus balticus away from the Sea- coast, 251 KINNEAR, NORMAN B., M.B.O.U., Notes on Birds seen in the Outer Hebrides in the Spring of 1906, 16, 81; Lesser Shrew at Ailsa Craig, 49; Common Shrew at Dunnet Head, 49; Fulmar nesting at Dunnet Head, 53; Indian appoint- ment for, 244 Lepidoptera from East Ross-shire, etc., 54, 119; Jinloch- Rannoch (Curr. Lit.), 58; in East Suther- land (Curr. Lit.), 123; Scottish, in 1906 (Curr. Lit.), 123 ; Scottish, in ‘Dale Collection” at Oxford (Curr. Lit.), 254 Lichens, Rare, New Localities for (Curr. Lit.) AEE Limonium, Notes on (Curr. Lit.), 125 Louse, New, from the Sheep, 225 Lupine, Blue, Origin of as a Denizen of the Dee, 188 MACDONALD, D., Great Grey Shrike in Mull, 115; Redstart in Mull, 247; Albino Shag in Mull, 247; Dotterel in Mull, 249 MACGILLIVRAY, Wm. L., Scoter in Barra, 116 MacpuHeErson, A. Ho re, M.A,, etc., Hedgehog in Argyll, 245 Macrag, A. C., New Records of Plants for South Aberdeenshire, 188 Macrobiotus dispar, sp. n. (Curr. Lit.), 124 Velvet Mammals of the Forth Area (Curr. Lit.), 189 Martens in N. W. Highlands, 111 MAcvicAR, SYMERS M., Additions for 1906 to Census of Scottish Hepaticze, 45 MAXWELL, Sir HERBERT, Bart., F.R.S.., Capercaillie in the South of Scot- land, 116 ; Wood Wasps, 119 Melanism in Scottish Lepidoptera (Curr. Lit.), 58 MENziEs, W. STEWART, Capercaillie and Willow Grouse in Moray, 116 MILNE, WM., Little Bittern in Inver- ness-shire, 248 Mite-Galls on the Beech in Scotland, 252 Mollusca of Inner Hebrides (Curr. Lit.), 57 Mortality amongst Guillemots and Razorbills, 53 Mosses, New and Rare from the West of Scotland, 171 Mosses, West Highland, and Problems they suggest, 42 Murray, JAMES, Some Rhizopods and Heliozoa of the Forth Area, 93 Murray, M. C., A New Variety of the Lesser Broomrape in Scotland, 253 Mycetozoa, Synopsis of (Curr. Lit.), 190 Myriapods of the Forth Area (Curr. Lit.), 190 Natural History Society of Scotland, wanted, 1 NEWTON, ALFRED, In Memoriam, 129 Nomenclature of British Plants, 241 Ornithology, Scottish, Report on for 1906, 130, 195 Ornithomyia lagopodis, a new Grouse- Fly (Curr. Lit.), 124 Oribatidze, New (Curr. Lit.), 95 Ospreys, History of the Loch -an- Eilein (Curr. Lit.), 254 Otiorrhynchus morto, v. ebeninus, in Sutherland (Curr. Lit.), 58 Oxyura (Proctotrypida), Scottish Species of, 31, 158 Owl, Snowy, in Perthshire, 115 Pastor, Rose-coloured, in Foula, 51 PATERSON, JOHN, Black-tailed God- wit in Lanarkshire, 184; Report on Scottish Ornithology for 1906, 130, 195 PATIENCE, ALEXANDER, New British Terrestrial Isopod, 85 Pezomachi and other Cryptine from ** Forth,” 120 INDEX 261 Phanerogams, Hybrids among British (Curr. Lit.), 255 Phora, British (Curr. Lit.), 58 Phora cubttalis (Curr. Lit.), 58 Phora sordidain Dumbartonshire (Curr. Lit.), 58 Phoxichilidium femoratun from Firth of Forth, 119 Pintail in Clyde Area, 182 Pintailin Forth Area, 115 Plankton of Scottish Lochs (Curr, Lit.), 190 Plants, British, disappearance of, 55 Plants, Cryptogamic, disappearance of (Gita White.) ASKS Plants of the Flannan Islands, 187 Plants of East Perth and South Aber- deen (Curr. Lit.), 255 Plants, New Records for South Aber- deenshire, 188 Plants spreading from Garden, 56 Plover, Grey, in Shetland in winter, 117 Plover, rush of Golden, at Tiree, 117 Polietes hirticrura in Arran (Curr. Lit.), Sy Polyzoa from Shetland (Curr. Lit.), 254 Prosecution under the Wild Birds Act, 215 Potamogeton, forms new (Cur. Lit.), 190 Potamogeton Macvicariz, Bennett, P. prelongus x P. polygonifolius, a new hybrid, 106 Potamogeton undulatus in Scotland, 104 Premachilis 119 Psychodidzee in Dumbarton in (Curr. Lit.), 123 to Britain hibernica in Scotland, 1906 Quail in Fife, 117 Quail nesting in East Lothian, 248 Ramalina, Gall formation on (Curr. Lit.), 255 Ramsay, L. N. G., and A. L. THom- sou Garganey in Aberdeenshire, 24 Raven and Ring Ousel near Glasgow (Curr. Lit.), 189 Red Deer, Scottish and Norwegian (Curr. Lit.), 189 Redstart in Mull, 247 RENNIE, JOHN, D.Sc., Centrolophus niger, Gmelin, on the Scottish coast, with a note on one or two points on its structure, 216 Rhacomitium ramulosum in Mid Perth (Curr. Lit.), 59 Rhizocarpon Lotum in Scotland (Curr. Ghia 2S Rhizopods of Forth Area, 93 Ribbon Vish in Orkney (Curr. Lit.), 123 RINTOUL, LEONORA JEFFREY, Quail in Fife, 117 ROBERTSON, Rev. W., Rose-coloured Pastors in Foula, 51 ROpDGER, ALEXANDER M., Common Seallyinuethe. ay eta es birds recently added to the Perth Museum, 184 Roses of AZol/’s Tomentosa Group (Curr. Lit.) 190 Rubi, British, Notes on(Curr. Lit.), 190 Sandpiper, Yellow-shanked, supposed occurrence of near Hawick, 118 SAXBY, Dr. T. EDMONDsTON, Bird Notes from North Shetland for 1906, 50; Garganey in Shetland, 182 Scoter nesting in Sutherland (Curr. Lit.), 254 Scoter, Velvet, at Burra, 116 Seal, Common, in the Tay, 112 Seal, Great Grey, in the Firth of Forth, 245 SEATTER, F., Great Grey Seal in the Firth of Forth, 245 Seed-Plants and Ferns, List of British, I2I, 124 SERLE, Rev. Wm., M.A., M.B.O.U., Note on the Breeding of the Snow- Bunting in Buchan, 185 SERVICE, ROBERT, M.B.O.U., Mor- tality among Guillemots and Razorbills, 53; Bird Notes from the Solway District, 112; Pied Flycatcher in Kirkcudbright, 183 Shag, Albino, in Mull, 247 Shrew, Common, at Dunnet Head, 49 Shrew, Lesser, at Ailsa Craig, 49 Shrike, Great Grey, in Mull, 115 Siberian Chiff-Chaff in Scotland, 15 Skinning Birds and Mammals, New Method of, 180 Smew in ‘ Forth,” 183 SOMERVILLE, ALEXANDER, the late, 193 St. Kilda, Diptera of, 150 Starlings, Marked, 114 STIRTON, JamMeEs, M.D., F.L.S., West Highland Mosses and Prob- lems they suggest, 42; New and Rare Mosses from the West of Scotland, 171 Swans, Wild, Migration of (Curr. Lit.), 189 Swans in the Outer Hebrides, 183 Tabanidee at Aberfoyle, 54 Tachinidee and their Hosts (Curr. Lit.), bf 262 THOMSON, A, LANDSBOROUGH, Black- throated Diver on the Aberdeen- shire Coast, 250 THomson, A. L., and Ramsay, L. N. G., Garganey in Aberdeen- shire, 248 Therioplectes montanus at Aberfoyle, 54 | Titmouse, Crested, in Scotland (Curr. Lit.), 253 TomIson, JAMES, Bird Life at Skerry- vore Lighthouse, 20; Yellow- browed Warbler at Skerryvore Lighthouse, 15 Topknot, Miiller’s, in Sound of Mull, Tees James W. H., M.A., M.D., F.L.S., Wanted, The Natural History Society of Scotland, 1 ; Carex muricata in North Aber- deen, 55; Gooseberry Mildews, 109; Origin of the Blue Lupine as a Denizen by the Dee, 188; Juncus balticus away from the Sea- coast, 251; Mite-galls on the Beech in Scotland, 252; Galled Flowers of Field Gentian, 252 Trees, Extra- Tropical, in Arran (Curr. Lit.), 59 Trienodes reutert near Aberfoyle (Curr. Lit.), 59 Triticum peregrinum near Edinburgh, IOI Troup, R. D. R., Early appearance of Eristalis tenax in the Forth Dis- trict, 186 TULLOCH, JOHN S., Bird Notes from Shetland, 49 ANNALS OF SCOTTISH NATURAL HISTORY Utricularia, Altitudinal Range of, 122 Warbler, Garden, in Shetland, 184 Warbler, Willow, unusual situation ot nest of, 247 Warbler, Yellow-browed, at Skerryvore Lighthouse, 51 Whaling in Scotland, 10 Whitethroat, Lesser, nesting in ‘* Tay,” 185 Wigeon, American, in Benbecula, 116 Wild Cats in N.W. Highlands, 49 WiLson, ROBERT, Grey-Lag Goose in Ayrshire, 52 Witson, W., Some Plants which spread from my Garden, 56 Woodcock, Winter movements of, 184 Woodcock, Spring return of, in Forth and Clyde, 143 Woodcock in Dumfriesshire, 249 Woodcock in Shetland in winter, 117 Woodpecker, Great Spotted, nesting in Loch Awe District, 182 Woodpecker, Great Spotted, nesting near Callander, Perthshire, 247 Woodpecker, Great Spotted, in Forth and Tay, 182 Woodpecker, Great Spotted, nesting in Perthshire, 247 Wood Pigeon, Food of, 183 Wood Wasp, 119 Xestophanes Tormentille, Histology of, (Gurieits) 722! Younc, Mary, Pied Flycatcher in Ayrshire, 247 END OF VOL. XVI. Printed by R. & R. CLARK, LimiteD, Edinburgh. ~ C < PI = 4 cS) r] e ral FE = brsttiziz peigesgssissesacsias. festst: =# Sei: Sisastiee coos sisi: é Bitetiessaiictitss ci NSsseie terse iin stat etite2