es rh Ly) 2 " > Tacikgin at A + MER ORAL KAN nt a OUT i i: iy Pap. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM VOLUME XY. ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM VOLUME XY. PRINTED FOR THE TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM BY ApDLARD & Son & West Newman, Lrp., Lonpon. 1914-1916. 4 7* it i a) = : ' 4 7 M , 19 : ay ' ' , = , : > 5 f i : ; T - s a i ie: ' A 6 9 M i ’ > 4 a ' x - ; i , ; So Ys iow cae a, 3 Wee - - = ' « i ‘ _ *, . ) : : ‘ i ' = ‘ : f A : . ” : ‘, ¥ 2 ‘ i ' : i. 1 r = 4 t : : f ' i : 1 ‘ = ' . J . ? = ‘ ‘ ' = a ‘ t a= 7 7 a 4: i | i 7 - i 4 i - : y ae a2 Se 35 Skuse oe & 0 fea . Ew tr. ee yi Hy 4 e ie eee |. - a - rete 3 ~ on f ; i aa Y r a 1 , i i] ; x F st te ¢ F a - ty ‘3 aoe v4 - . = 1 iW n! i =i > = ae ~ = « ‘ 1 i if te TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM. The Right Hon. JoHn Xavier Mrnrran, P.¢., M.L.A. Sir Tuomas Murr, Kt., C.M.G., LL.D., M.A., F.R.S., F.R.S.E. JoHn Wriiiam Jaccer, M.L.A., F.R.Stat.S. SCIENTIFIC STAFF OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM. Louis AuBERT PErRincueEy, D.Sc., F.Z.S., F.H.S., Director. Srpney Henry Haueuron, B.A.., F.G.S8., Assistant Director. ArtHur WiuutaM Rocers, Sc.D., Keeper of the Geological and Mineral Collections. Epwarp Percy Puruutrs, D.Sc., F.L.S., Assistant in Charge of the Herbarium. Kerepen Harcourt Barnarp, M.A., Assistant in Charge of Fish and Marine Invertebrate Collections. Ricwarb Wiun1am Eruenperr Tucker, B.A., Assistant in Charge of the Arthropoda (Insects excluded). LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS. . H. Barnarp. Contributions to the Crustacean Fauna of South Africa. Plates XXVI.- p.@.@ Hill) tere Rice ste hy Sore as mE a ER ee CoP stoie Giic . Moruey. On Some South African Ichneumonidae in the Collection of the South African Museum. Part I. . PERINGUEY. Descriptions of New or Little-known Orthoptera in the Collection of the South African Museum. Plate XLII. . O. Sars. The Fresh-water Entomostraca of Cape Province (Union of South Africa). Part I.: Cladocera. Plates XXIX.—XLI. .......-....--.----- ee (eta) ws (Are we © a 0) 610 & © -0),0,:0},0; © e)sulis; 10.6) 07.6 . R. R. STEBBING. (1) South African Crustacea (Part VII. of South African Crustacea, for the Marine Investigations in South Africa). Plates I-XII. ...... (2) South African Crustacea (Part VIII. of South African Crustacea, for the Marine Investigations in South Africa). Plates XHI.-XXV. . E. Turner. On some of the Scoliidae, mostly Elidinae (Hymenoptera), in the South Angee WHE UME. ooaHoo ones obanGodsDooEsdpunaomoDDGdooo MONO OO cK . VILLENEUVE. (1) Deseription of a New Species of Stomoxys (Diptera) from South Africa (2) A New Species of Tachino-Oestrid from South Africa (Diptera)...... (3) A Contribution to the Study of the South African Higher Myodarii (Diptera Calyptratae) based mostly on the Material in the South African Museum PAGE 401 303 = or ~I INDEX OF NEW GENERIC NAMES INTRODUCED IN THIS VOLUME. Aroegas, n. g., Locustidae (Orthoptera), Pering..................-. Asboleola, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen ..................... Cleonardopsis, n. g., Eusiridae (Amphipoda), Barn. Kixhippolysmata, n. g., Hippolytidae (Crustacea), Stebb. .............----- Faku, n. g., Locustidae (Orthoptera), Pering. .........-.... Haliporoides, n. g., Penaeidae (Crustacea), Stebb. .............-.. Hoplocephalina, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen. ..........-..---+-+05 Isaeopsis, n. g., Jassidae (Amphipoda), Barn. ........-. Rie Libanasidus, n. g., Locustidae (Orthoptera), Pering. ..........- Lydellina, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen.............-. 0. +e eee e eee Macropetasma, n. g., Penaeidae (Crustacea), Stebb. ........-...-..-++ 555. Macropisthopus, n. g., Ampithoidae (Amphipoda), Barn. ............-..--- Myxarchiclops, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen... Onosandridus, n. g., Locustidae (Orthoptera) Pering..... ...--.....+-+--5- Oxymedoria, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen.........-. 6-506. + sence eee Pararondania, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen. . Paravalettia, n. g., Lysianassidae (Amphipoda), Barn. ..... .....-..-.- Pemnophilias, n. g., Phliantidae (Amphipoda), Barn. .......-.-- Pleropeleteria, n. g., ‘lachinidae (Diptera), Villen. .... Pyrrhosiella, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen. ....:........ Riondaniovestrus, n. g., Vachinidae (Diptera), Villen. ............ Spelaeiacris, n. g., Locustidae (Orthoptera), Pering. .......2...++-++--0+5s Thelairosoma, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen. ..............-.--+.++-- Triodos, n. ¢., Ampeliscidae (Amphipoda), Barn. Trixoclea, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen. ..-.........-....-.. Umtata, n. g , Locustidae (Orthoptera), Pering. ............-----2-- sees Zitsikama, n. g., Locustidae (Orthoptera), Pering. ........---..2++ sees eee DATE OF ISSUE OF THE PARTS. Part 1, December 10th, 1914. Part 2, September 4th, 1915. Part 3, June 24th, 1916. Part 4, October 12th, 1916. Part 5, December Ist, 1916. Part 6, December 8th, 1916. Bochus, n. g., Locustidae (Orthoptera), Pering. ....... ......-...---- +e Chaetolydella, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen ........+...s00.+0++--55 Plagiocoma, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen ..............-.-.++-.0.5- Plioplateia, n. g., Phliantidae (Amphipoda), Barn..........-.-....-.++40- Prozenillia, n. g., Tachinidae (Diptera), Villen. -.......--------++-+-.-+s-- Est OF PEAS: PLATE I. Pomatocheles balssi, n. sp. II. Calocaris barnardi, n. sp. III. Penaeus pulchricaudatus, n. sp. IV. Penaeopsis spinulicauda, n. sp. VY. Parapenaeus fissurus (Bate), n. sp. VI. Haliporoides triarthrus, n. g. et sp. VII. Haliporoides triarthrus, n. g. et sp. VIII. Macropetasma africanus (Dalss), n. sp. IX. Husicyonia longicauda (Rathbun). X. Sclerocrangon bellmarleyi, n. sp. XI. Chlorotocus ecrassicornis, d. Costa. XII. Stylodactylus serratus, 4. Wilne-Edwards. XIII. Solenocera comatus, n. sp. XIV. Solenocera comatus, n. sp. XV. Philocheras megalocheir, u. sp. XVI. Palaemon delagoae, n. sp. XVII. Leander peringueyi, n. sp. XVUI. Leander gilchristi, n. sp. PLATE XIX. XXI. XXII. XXIII. XXIV. XXV. XXVI..- XXVIII. List of Plates. Palaemonetes natalensis, n. sp. Alpheus notabilis, n. sp. Alpheus notabilis, n. sp. Alpheus dissodontonotus, n. sp. Synalpheus anisocheir, n. sp. Spirontocaris pax, n. sp. Exhippolysmata tugelae, n. g. et sp. 1. Trischizostoma paucispinosum, li. sp. 2-3. Paravalettia chelata, n. sp. 4. Cyphocaris faurei, n. sp. 5. Stegocephaloides attingens, n. sp. 6. Ampelisca miops, n. sp. 7. Ampelisca natalensis, n. sp. -10. Triodos insignis, n. g. et sp. 11-12. Gitanopsis pusilla, n. sp. 3. Peltocoxa australis, n. sp. 14. Leucothoe dolichoceras, n. sp. 15-17. Stenothoe dolichopous, n. sp. 18-24. Plioplateia triquetra, n. g. et sp. 25-35. Temnophlias capensis, n. g. et Sp. . Bathymedon palpalis, n. sp. . Halicreion (?) ovalitelson, n. sp. . Epimeria semiarmata, n. sp. . Epimeria longispinosa, n. sp. 7-9. Cleonardopsis carinata, n. g. et Sp. 10. Rhachotropis paeneglaber, n. sp. 11-12. Maera hamigera (Haswell). 13-14. Elasmopus boeckii (Haswell). 15. Elasmopus levis, n. sp. 16-19. Eriopisa capensis, n. sp. 20-22. Gammarus capensis, Nn. sp. 23. Gammarus nigroculus, n. sp. 24-25, Gammarus crassicornis, n. sp. 26-28. Gammarus auricularis, n. sp. 29-32. Talorchestia quadrispinosa, n. sp. 33-34. Talorchestia australis, n. sp. 35-36. Talorchestia ancheidos, n. sp. 37. Hyale saldanha. _ 38-40. Chiltonia capensis, n. sp. 1x List of Plates. PLATE 2. Parorchestia dassenensis, n. sp. 3. Hyale diastoma, n. sp. 4, Hyale inyacka, n. sp. 6. Lembos hypacanthus, n. sp. —8. Lemboides acanthiger, n. sp. 9-10. Lemboides crenatipalma, n. sp. 11. Kurystheus afer (Stebbing). 12. Kurystheus imminens, n. sp. 13-14. Eurystheus semidentatus, n. sp. | 15-17. Macropisthopous stebbingi, n. g. et sp. 18. Ischyrocerus carinatus, n. sp. XXVIII. 19-21. Isaeopsis tenax, n. g. et sp. | 22. Laetmatophilus tridens, n. sp. 3. Podocerus palinuri. n. sp. . Podocerus africanus, n. sp. . Photis longicaudata (B. &¢ W.). . Stomacontion capense, n. sp. . Stegocephaloides australis, n. sp. bo ee] Or ww Ww w (oor) 30-31. Ampelisca palmata, n. sp. 2. Melita fresnelii (Audowin). 3. Elasmopus pectenicrus (Bate) 34. Ampithoe brevipes (Dane). 5. Caprellina spiniger, n. sp. Daphnia magna (Sfraus). XXIX.. Daphnia dolichocephala (G. O. Sars). { Daphnia hodgsoni, n. sp. ( Daphnia coronata, n. sp. AX, | Daphnia thomsoni, G. O. Sars. | Daphnia propinqua, G. O. Sars. Daphnia tenuispina, n. sp. | Simosa australiensis (Dana). | Simosa vetuloides os O. Sars). XXXII! Simosa capensis (G. O. Sars). | Scapholeberis kingi, G. O. Sars. ( Ceriodaphnia producta, n. sp. Ceriodaphnia reticulata (Juwrine), var. minor, n. Ceriodaphnia quadrangula (Muller), var. XXXIV. Ceriodaphnia laticaudata, P. E. Muller. ( Ceriodaphnia dubia, Richard. ( Ceriodaphnia rigaudi, Richard. Moina macrocopa (Straus). Moina tenuicornis, G. O. Sars. Moina brachiata (Jurvine). | Moina dubia, Richard. XXXV.- List of Plates. PLATE. ( Echinisea capensis, n. sp. XXXVI.J Macrothrix propinqua, G. O Sars. | Macrothrix spinosa, King. ( Ilyocryptus sordidus (Lievin). XXXVII.| Leydigia macrodonta, n. sp. ee Leydigia propinqua, G. O. Sars. XXXVHI. | Leydigia microps, n. sp. | Alona aftinis (Leydig). | Alona harpularia, n. sp. XXXIX.-. Alona arcuata, n. sp. | Alona striolata, n. sp. Alona intermedia, G. O. Sars. Alona crassicauda, n. sp. | Alona pulchella, King. Alona bukobensis, Welthner. Alona karua, King. | Alonella excisa (Fischer). Chydorus barroisi (Richard). XL.- HKuryalona colletti (@. O. Sa rs). XLI.. Pleuroxus inermis, G. O. Sars. { Dunhevedia crassa, King. Spelaeiscus tabulae, n. sp. | Shortridgea miranda, n. sp Zitsikama tessellata, n. sp. | Libanasidus vittatus, Kirby. Platysiagon capicola, n. sp. | Umtata musicus, n. sp. XLIL.- INDEX OF AS Acaenitus, Latr. Acanthephyra, Miln. Edw. Acanthocercus, Schédl........... Acanthoplus, Stdl........ Acanthoproctus, Karsch. .... Agrypon, Forst....... AV OME OU Gs veers one: AlonellasSansan tenes cee. ALONODSISH SAS eee INN OINEE, THONG cb aconcconee AN MeWA AUIS, JeGIIDS sano 55 cane Amblyteles, Wesm..... ... Amineliscashidi/mn seen ane aes Ampithoe, Leach Lata, JeQGHGiPs soceeago0c Anisobas,. Wes. Anthosoma, Leach Antistasea, Bischof. .. INI, TGR 5 coco 60 ar Aphractia, [virb. Apodaera, Macq. : Argyrophylax, Br. & Berg. Avistacomorpha. ood. Jas. Ale. Aristias, Boeck. NOE JAA) bo h 6605005900 46 Anytropieris, yal cin. tr-ieras eels Athanasael Caceres: Be Balantiss CLUS mee eee eee tee Barichneumon, Thonis........... ISP HIRE ee mo tinioa ot. omonos Bathymedons (Sais. eee cee. Benthesicymus, Bate .......... Blepharipoda, Br. @ Berg. ...... Bochus eRenungiecre reece ‘BruzeliawBoechk.s. seaseeee BE IGP as eaanabcoce poser Byblis, Boeck. BV SOY Bi COM eirene ah 1s ois cicreaoreers CallidorawOhonss ces: secs GENERA. Callinectes, Stimps. ............ Calocaris Cl) mone eerie CampoplexiGiaulisen se aerate Cancer (Astacus), Gron. Cancer iin eee een Cry, IEDs cocacccedaceddde Caprellina, V’homs. CarceliawhOUMPDCSUna seer eee CaridiniawiVilis Hives. 2s epee Casinaniaweloniseaeieacieeee iene Catagonia, Bric Berg. 22. 3-2-6. (OfseROWI SGWies caning ec ahudcsocac Ceriodaphnia, Schoedel. ........ Chaetolydella, Villen. Charybdis, de Haan..... Cheraplulus; ona ya ae een ele | CG)awsneylian, MMW aconacasacee | Cheiriphotis, Walk. GhiltoniaesSteoUe sree eee Chlorotocus, Miln. Hdw. ........ Chydonus 3 atidapeeaet treet Cleonardopsis, Bard. See J BCH Rs oois GIS a6 Hanoy 0 cence eae Big: iorelese tows nneeee CrossocosmiaswMtks mackerel CryptionewHansenass seme ett Cryptopimpla, Vasch. Cryptus, Pabr. Ctenichneumon, Thoms. ........ Cienocharess Camara CtenotomanCantsmeemne cite ie Cymodusa, olimgin a. cer cr Cyclograpsus, Miln. Ndw. Cyphocaris, Boeck. Cystisoma, Guér. Men........... Cystocoelia, Serv. ........ Dajus Orgy! Teasoomeis sone see Daphnia, Fr. Mull. : Dehaanius, Weleay.........-... | Dejeania, Rob. Desv.......... siete DiOgeEnes PI ANA. eisetteie ls se eles 508 393 343 475 48 Index of Genera. Bchinisca;wEveve as. - os ree ane Echthromorpha, Ee a. Elasmopus, Cost. ae ae OOs ee sc as 2 ee Enyaliopsis, Harsli, Savemacea se IDyorNETAe, COS Good coobc0 doc eae Kriopisa, Stebb. Meer ss Diane, Wiehe o cote codecasues IDWS ant, JOH in cos bon dou 00 eer TD ae ak OME eama opie. tsicis G CRO eRore ITO LGV Oca vdeo co boeaee Kuonyx, Norm. ....... Eupalaemon, Ortm. .. . Eupalamus, Wesm. I peAANOME, SCH gol bcoe abe Kurylabus, Wesm.......... Eurystheus, Bat. bee ane voreia Sere EUSIGYONI as TStCOUse ise cic eile ere Eusiroides, Stebb. Exetastes, Gravh. EERE Ses Exhippolysmata, Stebb. IEFXOLISta 9 WieUgemeerie a eee ack Faku, Péring.... Gabuniasekneclibas see eee Galathea, Mabr. 02... -: Gammarus, Fab. Gennadas, Bate Gitanopsis, Sars. Gonodactylus, Latr Goryphus, Holmgr. Grubia, Czern. POS cesar he Guernea, Chevr......... dele ahereion, Boechkseneriean Haliporoides, Stebb...... Halporus, Bate ..... Hemiarthrus, Giard é Bonn. Hemihetrodes, Piece Hemiteles, Grav. Henicus, Gray Hetairus, TENS Sa ae Heterocarpus,' Miln. Edw. Hetrodes, Fisch. Hippolysmata, Kemp aoe lahiynolnies JOP chao canoend. be Eaippomedont Boeck..........4-- Isloxenoxenchie. JWG 6466 coou One seo Hoplisa, Rond, xiil PAGE Hoplocephalella, Villen. ........ 509 Hoplocephalina, Villen. ......... 510 Eliyalle sR aitlikcelc aysyrone ts) aattenete ser 229 Hymenosoma, Desm............. 58 lake ILCs sadeoonueadoDdKc 285 | ASENGMVE), (OIE boone 405000 bc 57 I NORIO, soo bacdeabunSooun 64 | dilanavey its, (oki Soccce eenadodbon 122 UM CXR AOUEK ISCAS Gocoecadnunbde 327 ISHEOPSIS; Bliss Sere ot oLetehstore 267 | Ischnojoppa; Kricchb. ...-2....- 308 I Uschymocerus}eAGGy. pees: 264 J. Jassa, Leach 262 L. Laetmatophilus, Bruz..........- 274 Leander, Desm.. Jeno Gvls iixeh, 725 716) Lemboides, Alen eee aPEN) Lembos, Bate ...... : 237 Leueifer, Vaugh. Thomps. eater 27 IMAG, WLAN) aouwsoncagboolT 58 | Sheucothoe; Weach w. se 2. -2- 6: 148 Mey dieia Karzai ee eine 328 limlopnnschiis, JAG) ascooncucacs 424 Miljeborsias bate s.c-e ee eee 167 imissonota, Grasses 22 2 -ie OSO Listrognathus, V’shek. ...... ... 378 Iu ECHO Comscouedatecanpas Us Inydellanay Willen. nc 26 oe oc 490 Lysianassa, MW. Hdw... 120 M. Macropestama, Stebb. ........ 22, 58 Macropisthopous, Barn. .. .... 260 Macroterocheir, Stebb........... 72 WiEKorOyA mabe, JERE ooo cooconS << 325 Macra, Leach...... 193 Matuta, Fabr....... 58 Maxenteusy Stale waco vac. 415 Melanichneumon, T'homs......... 363 Melitta each. clas oc a ae 189 WICKES ISHHIESSS Be oooo ce Desens ee 460 Metapeneus, Wood. Mas. ... 15 Metopius; Paz: jaciees- 2 es. 390 Micropalpus, Macq. ... 471 Miltogramma, Meig........... . 508 Mixtopagurus, Miln. Fdw. ...... 3 MWoyiO A JEW ba es oo aos Gobo Oe Coos 319 Monoculus, Linn.......-. 316, 321, 323 XIV Index of Genera. PAGE Munidopsis, JVhiteav. .......... 6 MPR, IEMs Sooo décaacessecaue Bil?) Myxarchiclops, Villen........... 494 Myzine, Latr..... 455 N. NSN Sw ao vocoacadcsoa08 415 Nematocarcinus, Miln. Ndw. .... 99 Nemenitissaialngmnere eee e 395 Nemoraea, Rob. Déesv. .......... 485 INGO ANUS, JODEioc ho ade saonsdoc 359 NGG, MORI coouczoecucooece 397 NMG ND, JO Gaol saan ee 161 Nototrachys, Warsh .. 392 Nototropis, Cost. 173 O. Ocypode right nner ee man S Ocypterawiatine oases ee D06 Oediceroides, Stebb. ............ 162 ORS, SUINIISs c6o0c0c0dasen608 31 Omorga, Thonss -eeoe.. 395 Onosandridus, Péring .......... 421 Onosandrus, Stal. ........ 421 Orthoprotella, May 284 Osprhynehotus, Spin. .......... 378 Oxymedoria, Villers... .225224 50D Pe eMC, JAM, ao sunnaeoonaues fe) Palaemonetes, Heller .......... 77 Palaemonopsis, Stimps. 77 Jer IOAS EL ps aI Meet ae 486 Randalustwiseucly seein eee aes: 36 EEN AVISC, GRWMs50b4 su 50ne cance 393 Paramoera, Miers ............ 183 Parandentay Stepb. es cease. 131 Parapandalus, Borrad........... 3 Parapasiphae, Smith ............ 32 Parapenaeus, Smith ............ 18 Parapronoe, Claus.............. 293 Pararondania, Villen. 498 Paravalettia, Barn. .......... i Paribacas, Dana. 2.28000. Ee 64 Parorchestia, Stebb. .. soon | PAG Parribacus, Dana ........ sq alle, (oye! ReliocoxasGattan nese eee 146 Penaeopsis, Mii. Edw. ........ 1b Penaeopsis, Miln. Hdar........... 70 IPaRENSTIS), HNN, ti an aa dio oh ou sae" 12 IEYORVSMIS, WUIRS coco gaanconsans: 69 Pentacheles, Bate 2.3.0.5. -5 254 11 REXODSIS; eo lenCe PE CNG) ener 492 Philocheras,eStepo. as see seeoee 71 Philopsyehe, Gani; 22.86 uae .. 9388 PAGE Phobocampa, Dhoms. .......... 396 Phorostomas ond.) .2.aceeeeee 504 LEONI, GUMS go sbooee en onde 0a 242 IRN, IMs eae go s60douunee 292 PH GY XU ISGNSa wep sack setts 47 PARWIHOD, Salis sonbcocbsoos00e: 283 Vey HAGOd IVC Sirs cies iersi sieht 33 Phyeadenon, Gravy sos =a: 371 Raliimnius i Geacl) wane ae AY | Bam play uD Nee) sy.) tsetse ie 386 Plagiocoma, Villen. ............ 473 Platyischnopus, Stebb. ...... 32,142 Platylabusiestlecmeer teeter 368 LAER ATENEO, JEVMINIS 5500 506555000 423 Pleropeletaria, Villen. .......... 470 PIESI8;, IT custens Sire concrete Oe Re 455 Blestonmika Baten see: 37 Pleuroxus, Baird 342 Blioplateiay Barn: ~- 2.25 a. - 155 Preumora, Thunb... -.+2s-6--255 409 IPOS KOXEHUUG IOLONA. Soconacdaaaohe 276 Poecilopimpla, Morl....2. 2 5--.. 387 Polycheria, Hasvw... 210 Polyelistus, First eae 391 Pomatocheles, Miers...... 3 Poncellanaweli aise cers eee 58 Prozemnuillias) Willen. Usenet 487 Pylocheles, Miln. Edw......... 2 Pyrellia, Rob. Desv. . 012 Pyrrhosiella, Villen......... 501 R. Riaehotropis, iS... 2. ese ee 178 Rondaniooestrus, Villen...... 465 S. Saron. Thalln. seodatvek 34 Seapholeberis, Schoed........ 314 sclerocancon, Sirs. )..asosne eee 29 Scolia,, Wau, Vee on) sees 462 Scyllanuss Ha0) seer 62 | Seypholanceola, Wolt. .......... 290 | Sericophoromya, dust........... 479 | Setulia, Rob. Desu. . aceereee er 509 Shortrideea, Peng... 2. aac see = 412 Sicyomia, Mali dip. a2. 25 SHINE, CCG ooooke oc 377 Simocephalus, Sehoed. 311 Simosae NOpnusmeciererecneerat: 311 Siphonoecetes; Kaioy-.- i... = - 269 Sjostedtiella, Szep...........-... 388 SOCRENOPSIS, CEU ese ey. + 124 Solenocera, Luc. abe 66 Spelaeiacris, Péring. ..... .. 420 Spirontocaris, Bate 22... ).....30, 9 SEMIN, JAH. gas co po ob bonnes 63 Stegocephaloides, Sars. ........ 128 Index of Genera. PAGE SLENArAcCUs, ROMS. oo. c+. 4 a6 376 SLenothoe ands aes hie e see ne 153 Niictocry plus; Cam .- 5255.24 0- 379 Stochasmus, Bate ........ 100 Stomacontion, Stebb. .......... 109 Stomatomya, Villen. ........... 475 NLOMOXVSGCOfi= «+e sea 453 SLENEOAU Ey JNO IDOHES GA ca oo bac oc 475 Stylodactylus, Miln. Mdw. .. ... 50 SMM MACE, 650 coogmo bebe 85 AME TG, WAS .oaeceddde os Oe ox 493 Tachinomima, Br. d& Berg. ...... A472 Ataniiinayiore, WOW saacelsaee ence 222 Talorchestia, Dana .... .... d8, 21d Temnophlias, Barn. ............ 158 inn alanaitawsatis ci ene ee 58 Thelairosoma, Villen. 499 AMnerIS, IBAA caeacbacoognbanc 61, 64 Theronia, Holmgr......... 387 Mricholygashonds 3:7 -0-42 4+. - 494 Triodos, Barn. 140 Trischizostoma, Boeck..:.......- Triocleasswllene sas eters Uristes, Dana. Urothoe, Dan. Xanthojoppa, Cam. Xiphidion, Serv. Xylonomus, Gravh. Z. Onesehs TOO e nas ao so oe | Umitata,sPeniniges. 2.5. Aenilliae ovr eSule wee Zitsikama, Péring ...... Zonophryxus, Richards 358 447 384 485 446 48 Paes ihe 2S) te aris ‘ i An wre rca a ANNALS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MUSEUM. (Von. XV.) 1.—South African Crustacea (Part VII. of S.A. Crustacea, for the Marine Investigations in South Africa).—By the Rev. Tuomas R. R. Stepsine, M.A., F.B.S., F.L.8., F.Z.8., Fellow of King’s College, London, Hon. Memb. New Zealand Inst., Hon. Fellow Worcester College, Oxford. (Plates I—XII. of Vol. XV. Plates LXV.—LXXVI. of Crustacea.) Ar various opportunities Dr. Gilchrist and Dr. Péringuey have sent me specimens of Macrura from South African waters. I was in hopes of being able to deal with the accumulated material in a single essay. But it now seems expedient to offer the present contribution as a first instalment of the report. There is some excuse for going slowly. The literature of the subject has become voluminous, and not infrequently the student is confronted with two opposite diffi- culties, in having to guess what species was intended by an old meagre description, and in having to weigh critically all the minute distinctions of a modern elaborate one. When there are many speci- mens at his disposal all superficially alike, he has to guard against overlooking important characters that may differentiate some of them. When the specimen is unique, there is the torturing alterna- tive of spoiling it for exhibition in a museum by dissection, or spoiling it for any real use to science by leaving it intact. With the extension of research the task of assigning specific names becomes increasingly hard, as connecting links are discovered between species and species, and the range of variability within an acknowledged species is demonstrated. Of the South African macruran fauna it is probably true that its members have very near relatives in almost every part of the ocean. Six new species are here proposed, and two new genera, Hali- poroides and Macropetasma. Further, the name Pomatochelidae is substituted for the family previously called Pylochelidae, and for the preoccupied names Sicyonia and Ogyris the new generic names 1 2 Annals of the South African Musewm. EHusicyona and Ogyrides are offered respectively in exchange. Incidentally a parasitic isopod is named Hemiarthrus nematocarcint and the amphipod Platyischnopus mirabilis is added to the South African fauna. . MACRURA. MACRURA ANOMALA. Tris PAGURIDEA. 1888. Pagwridea, Henderson, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 27, p. 40. Famity POMATOCHELIDAE. 1888. Pylochelidae, Bate, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 24, pp. 10, 11. 1892. Parapaguridae, Ortmann, Zool. Jahrb., vol. 6, pp. 248, 274. 1893. - Stebbing, Hist. Crust., Internat. Sci. Ser., vol. 74, pp. 166, 169. 1901. Pylochelidae, Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Crust. Anomala, p. 209 (Pomatochelidae ?, p. 210). 1905. a Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Anomura, fase. 1, pp. 12313; 1913. 55 Balss, Abhandl. K. Bayer. Ak. Wiss., Suppl. vol. 2, pt. 9, p. 34. The genera included in this family, according to Alcock, are Pomatocheles, Miers, 1879, Pylocheles, A. Milne-Edwards, 1880, Mixtopagurus, A. Milne-Edwards, 1880, Checroplatea, Bate, 1888, and Parapylocheles, Alcock, 1901. The proximity of Pomatocheles to Pylocheles was noticed by A. Milne- Edwards and Bouvier in 1893, and in 1913 the species Pomatocheles jeffreysii, Miers, is transferred by Balss to Mixtopagurus. But clearly the generic name given by Miers has the precedence, and the union of the two genera requires that the Mixtopagurus paradorus of A. Milne- Edwards and Henderson’s Pylocheles spinosus should be renamed as species of Pomatocheles. There is a difficulty in regard to Mixtopagurus gilli, Benedict, 1901, that it has a very unsymmetrical telson, which would seem to exclude it from this family altogether. That the family should be named Pomatochelidae after its premier genus, as Alcock suggested in 1901, is to my mind obvious, but quot honvines, tot sententiae. South African Crustacea. 3 Gen. POMATOCHELES, Miers. 1879. Pomatocheles, Miers, Pr. Zool. Soc. London, p. 49. 1880. Mixtopagurus, A. Milne-Edwards, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., vol. 8, pt: 8) p.39. 1893. - A. M.-Edwards and Bouvier, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol. 14, No. 3, p. 23. 1905. Pomatocheles and Mixtopagurus, Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep- sea Anomura, fase. 1, p. 14. 1913. Mixtopagurus, Balss, Abhandl. K. Bayer. Ak. Wiss., Suppl. yOln Apts oO) Devos. In his synopsis of the genera, Alcock distinguishes Poma- tocheles as having “ hands of chelipeds forming an operculum ” from Mixtopagurus with ‘ chelipeds not operculiform.” Both are distinguished from Pylocheles and Cheiroplatea by having the third maxillipeds normal instead of cheliform. The new species here described is distinguished from P. gilli by its symmetrical telson, from P. paradorus by having the palp of the first maxillae simple instead of two-jointed, from P. spinosus by its unequal chelipeds, and from P. jeffreysi by longer eyestalks, the rostrum acute instead of rounded, unequal and strongly tuberculose chelipeds, and the much more sharply separated lobes of the telson. POMATOCHELES BALSSI, N. sp. Plate LXV. The anterior half of the carapace is calcified, the rest more or less membranaceous, as is the case with the pleon except in the short first segment and the sixth, the latter appearing to be immovably bent, as though the telson and uropods were permanently folded forwards and underneath. It is rather remarkable that this symmetrical hermit should have been found occupying a simple cylindrical coral which is itself curved and tapers to a narrow completely closed foot. But similarly P. jeffreysit occupied the curved shell of a Dentaliwm. The general surface is pilose, the rostral point acute, a smaller acute point being formed by the front margin outside each ocular peduncle. These peduncles are long, a little dilated for the small dark cornea ; the small scales at the base are not contiguous and are produced on the inner side into a single acute point. The telson is much longer than broad, bilobed with a deep apical incision, the sides of which, like the free border all round, are fringed with plumose setae; the 1 Annals of the South African Museum. outer lateral margins are convex, with no such concavity as is shown in the figures of P. jeffreysit and P. spinosus. In P. paradoxus the sides of the telson are sinuous in the figure, but in the description the telson is said to be ‘‘ broadly emarginate behind and excavate on the sides.” The first antennae have a first joint rather longer than the second, with an apical tooth on one side and one below the apex on the other; the third joint is rather shorter than the second; the prin- cipal flagellum is subequal in length to the peduncle, its first half broad, with very long plumose setae, the whole nearly twice as long as the slender companion flagellum. The peduncles are perhaps scarcely as long as the eyes, Benedict, in comparing P. gilli with P. paradoxus, remarks that in the latter species these peduncles do not reach the corneae, while in the former they pass them. But it may be asked whether he is not comparing the peduncles of his own species fully extended with those of Milne-Edwards’ figured in their natural geniculate position, which shows the second joint end on, thus giving no idea of its actual length. The long third joint of the mandibular palp is partially fringed with setules. The middle plate of the first maxillae is fringed with numerous strong spines, the narrow one-jointed ‘“‘palp’’ has six slender spines at the apex. The long sinuous apical joint of the second maxillae, broad at its base, is drawn out to a fine point at the lightly armed apex. In the third maxillipeds the third joint is armed with a long row of teeth, the fourth joint has two teeth at the outer apex, the sixth joint is elongate, carrying the short spinose seventh at its end, with no suggestion of the chelate character which makes these appendages notable in Pylocheles. The first peraeopods are not symmetrical, that on the left side being considerably the larger. In both, the fourth, fifth, and sixth joints are furnished with numerous teeth, the fingers of the left chela being stout, shorter than the palm, while those on the right are subequal to it in length. The small but sturdy fifth peraeo- pods have the sixth joint frmged with close-set spines, the short finger closing tightly on the truncate or slightly concave apex. The first pleopods of the male are set rather near together, mem- branaceous, fringed with setae, in shape like a flat spoon, the handle curved, of uniform width, the bowl pointed. The second pair wide apart, with stiff peduncle, the single ramus ending in a membrana- ceous trowel-shaped expansion. The three remaining pairs all mem- branaceous, each with a long and a short ramus. Peduncle of the uropods with a small tooth at each apex, both rami fringed South African Crustacea. 5 with long plumose setae and pads of short stout spines along the outer margin. Total length, allowing for an extended telson, about 18 mm, the carapace accounting for 6 mm. The eyes are 3 mm. long. The coral is 33 mm. long, width of interior at the top nearly 7 mm. externally 10 mm., narrowest part 6 mm. Locality. Near East London, Cove Rock NW. 2 W. 13 miles (Cape Colony); depth 80-130 fathoms. A 1571.* The specific name is given in compliment to Dr. Heinrich Balss, a valued carcinologist. Tre GALATHEHIDEA. 1888. Galatheidea, Henderson, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 27, p. 103. Faminy GALATHEIDAE. 1853. Galatheidae, Dana, U.S. Expl. Exp., vol. 18, p. 1431. Gen. GALATHEHA, Fabricius. 1793. Galathea, Fabricius, Entomologia Sytematica, vol. 2, p. 472. GALATHEA DISPERSUS, Bate, 1858. Galathea dispersa, Bate, Journ. Pr. Linn. Soc. London, vol. 3, INO 9s peo: 1863. G. nexa, Heller (not Embleton), Crust. siidl. Europa, p. 191, pl. 6, fig. 4 (by misprint 3 in expl. pl.). 1888. G. dispersa, Henderson, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 27, pt. 69, p. 119, pl. 12, figs..6, 6a. 1888. 5 Bonnier, Bull. Sci. France Belgique, Ser. 3, vol. 1, Nos. 4-8, p. 68, pl. 13, figs. 1-3. 1900. HS A. Milne-Edwards et Bouvier, Crust. Decap., Travailleur et Talisman, p. 278, pl. 29, figs. 2, 3. 1910. Stebbing, Ann. §. Afr. Mus., vol. 6, pt. 4, p. 364. The fuller description of Stimpson’s Galathea labidoleptus, published in 1907, long after Stimpson’s death, appears to show * The number given with a locality only concerns the South African Museum. 1874. 1882. Annals of the South African Museum. many points of difference from G. dispersus. Thus he describes the rostrum as long, with the four lateral teeth as small and very slender, the gastric region of the carapace carrying 2 little spines anteriorly, the chelipeds as rather stout, hand with a thick palm, but very slender fingers, which together are much narrower than the palm, straight and not toothed. In the specimens here referred to G. dispersus the rostrum cannot properly be called long, and three of the lateral teeth are not small nor always slender, the teeth behind the rostrum on the gastric region are 6 in number. Within and slightly below the antero-lateral tooth there is a small denticle, and a row of denticles runs behind the antero-lateral to a pterygo- stomian tooth; a line of seven teeth runs down each side. The first joint of the first antennae has three long apical processes. The fingers of the chelipeds are together not strikingly narrower than the palm, and they are not devoid of teeth on their confronting margins, though the teeth are inconspicuous except one near each curved apex. Perhaps the most distinctive feature of this species is one to which Stimp- son’s account makes no allusion, namely, the four conspicuous teeth on the oblique distal margin of the fourth joint in the third maxillipeds. The difficulty of deciding anything as to the independence of Stimpson’s species is in large measure due to the varying characters of G. dispersus. Thus Hender- son states that ‘‘the first striated ridge on the gastric area, situated at the base of the rostrum, bears from two to six spinules, but in some cases they are obsolete.’ A. Milne- Edwards and Bouvier have discussed the great differences in size that occur between adult specimens. In our three South African specimens, of graduated sizes, the medium one was 23 mm. long, of which the carapace accounted for 12°5 mm., the rostral part of it being 4:5 mm., and the greatest breadth 8 mm. Only in the smallest of the three did the rostral lateral teeth give the impression of slenderness. Locality. Great Fish Point Lighthouse, W. by N. 5 miles (Cape Colony); depth 22 fathoms. A 919. GreN. MUNIDOPSIS, Whiteaves. Munidopsis, Whiteaves, Amer. J. Sci., Ser. 3, vol. 7, p. 212. S. I. Smith, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., vol. 10, No. 1, -p. 21: 1888. 1895. 1900. 1901. 1902. 1904. 1880. 1894. 1897. 1900. South African Crustacea. 6 Munidopsis, Henderson, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 27, pt. 69, p. 148. s Faxon, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zodl., vol. 18, p. 81. - A. Milne-Edwards et Bouvier, Exp. Travailleur et Talisman, Crust. Decap., pt. 1, p. 312. . Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Crustacea, p. 247. a Benedict, Pr. U.S. Mus., vol. 26, pp. 244, 315. - Calman, Ann. Nat. Hist., Ser. 7, vol. 14, p. 214. Aleock’s synonymy of this genus includes Galathodes, Oro- phorhynchus, Elasmonotus, instituted by A. Milne-Edwards in 1880, Anoplonotus, Smith, 1883, Galathopsis, Henderson, 1885, and Bathyankyristes, Aleock and Anderson, 1894, the intergrading of all but the last having been already discussed by Faxon in 1895. But, while making the name Mumnidopsis generically paramount, Alcock divides the genus into five groups under the names Munidopsis, Galathodes, Oropho- rhynchus, Elasmonotus, Bathyankyristes, so that the last four generic names seem to be practically readmitted as it were by the back door, after being turned out by the front one. Group 1 is defined as :— “‘ Munidopsis proper, with the antero-lateral angles of the carapace spiniform, even if the lateral borders are not anteriorly spinose or dentate; with the rostrum styliform or acutely triangular, without any lateral spines; with the chelipeds decidedly longer than the legs and usually, in the male, as long as, or longer than, the fully extended body; and with the eyes terminal on the eye-stalks, which are almost always freely movable.”’ Munipopsis simpuex, A. Milne-Edwards, Galathodes simplex, A. Milne-Edwards, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., vol. 8, p. 56. Mumdopsis simplex, A. M.-Edwards et Bouvier, Ann. Sci. Nat., Ser. 7, vol. 18, p. 275. = a A. M.-Edwards et Bouvier, Mem. Mus, Comp. Zool., vol. 19, No. 2, p. 89, pl. 5, figs. 2-7. . z A. M.-Edwards et Bouvier, Exp. Tra- vailleur et Talisman, Crust. Decap., p. 314. 8 1902. 1908. 1893. 1901. 1903. Annals of the South African Museum. Munidopsis simplex, Benedict, Pr. U.S. Mus., vol. 26, pp. 277, 326. “ . Hansen, Danish Ingolf Exp., vol. 3, Crust. Malac., p. 37. In Benedict’s useful key to fifty-one species of the genus, M. simplex is distinguished as one of those in which eye spines are not present, the rostrum is simple and curved upward, the armature of the pleon confined to the median line, the median line on the gastric area armed with spines or tubercles, orbicular (? orbital) sinus lacking, and finally with carapace of nearly uniform width, widest in middle, not cut up into lobes. M. longirostris, A. M.-Edwards and Bouvier, agrees with it, according to the key, except in having ‘‘ carapace not uniform in width, cut into lobes by cervical sutures” and ‘“ broadest near anterior end.’’ Our specimens have the carapace narrowest near anterior end, with antero-lateral spines less pronounced than those figured for M. longirostris. On the other hand, the third maxillipeds have only two teeth on the inner margin of the fourth joint, which the French authors mention as a character of their species, compared with the three teeth in M. simplex. Here also the carapace has a transverse pair of teeth followed by a single tooth near them and another quite distinct at a distance, in accord with M. longirostris. Thus, as the French authors themselves suggest, the two forms are probably not specifically distinct. The carapace including rostrum of the larger specimen measures 22 mm, in length, the pleon being rather shorter ; it contained eggs in no great quantity. The carapace of a much smaller specimen measured 18 mm., of which the rostrum accounted for 7°5 mm. Locality. Cape Point, N. 77° E. (Cape Colony); depth 660 fathoms. A 912. MACRURA GENUINA. Trine THALASSINIDEA. Thalassinidea (part), Stebbing, History of Crustacea, Internat. Sci. Ser., vol. 74, p. 180. i Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Macrura, p. 151. i Borradaile, Ann. Nat. Hist., Ser. 7, vol. 12, p. 534, South African Crustacea. 9 Famity AXIIDAE. 1888. Amiidae, Bate, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 24, p. 36. 1901. - Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Macrura, p. 186. 1901. Be Rathbun, Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm. 1900, vol. 2, p. 95. 1906. . Rathbun, Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm. 1903, pt. 3, p. 893. WSO . Borradaile, Ann. Nat. Hist., Ser. 7, vol. 19, pp. 468, 475, 476. 1914. . Balss, Abhandl. K. Bayer. Ak. Wiss., Suppl. vol. 2, pt. 10, p. 895. Gen. CALOCARIS, Bell. 1853. Calocaris, Bell, Brit. Stalk-eyed Crust., p. 231 (dated 1847 by White in List of British Crustacea in Brit. Mus., p. 33, 1850). 1891. - Ortmann, Zool. Jahrb., vol. 6, p. 50, pl. 1, fig. 5, (mouth organs). 1901. ie Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Macrura, p. 187 (with synonymy, p. 189). 1908. ss Lagerberg, Goteborgs K. Vet. Handl., Ser. 4, vol. sa hs opnas 1908. i Hansen, Danish Ingolf Exp., vol. 3, Crust. Malac. p. 41 (distribution). CALOCARIS BARNARDI, 0. sp. Plate LXVI. From Bell’s C. macandreae the present species is well distinguished by the very different proportions of the large chelae in the first peraeopods, the fingers in the former being about three times as long as the palm, while here the fixed finger is not longer than the palm and the movable finger about once and a half as long as that shorter part of the palm to which it is attached. In C. alcocki, McArdle, the palm is as long as the fingers, but the whole structure is more slender than in the new species. There also the rostrum is upturned, whereas here it is perfectly straight and horizontal; the carinae diverging backwards from the rostrum are each sur- mounted by three denticles.. The telson has a minute median spine in its very shallow apical emargination. The eyes are large, flattened, and as preserved opaque white. 10 Annals of the South African Museum. In the first antennae the proximal portion of the first joint is much wider than the distal; of the two slender flagella one is rather more than thrice, the other more than four times as long as the peduncle. In the second antennae the penultimate joint of the peduncle is twice as long as the last joint, but only a little longer than the ante-penultimate joint; the flagellum is about twice as long as the longer one in the first pair. In the palp of the mandibles the third joint is the longest. The long two-jointed palp of the first maxillae has the first joint straight, the second sinuous. The third maxillipeds have an apical tooth on the first joint and also on the second, the remaining joints are beset with numbers of very long spine-like setae; the third joint has a slightly oblique surface row of 8 or 9 teeth, and the following joint has a small sub-terminal tooth as in C. alcocki ; the seventh joint has a close brush of serrate spines in addition to its long setae. The fixed finger of the first peraeopods has its inner margin crenulate, met before the centre by a prominence of the movable finger. The confronting margins of both fingers in the second peraeopods are finely denticulate. The first pleopods resemble the petasmata of the Penaeids, but are described and figured by Alcock as common to both sexes. The remarkable second pleopod of the female found in C. alcocki is not represented in our specimens. They attain a length of 38 mm. Locality. Cape Castle, EK. $ N. 9 miles (near Saldanha Bay, Cape Colony); depth 89 fathoms. A 1549. The specific name is given to mark my sense of the excellent service which Mr. K. H. Barnard is rendering to carcinology at the South African Museum under the auspices of Dr. Péringuey. Trirs HRYONIDEA. 1901. Hryonidea, Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Macrura, p. 151. 1910. ” Stebbing, Ann. S. African Mus., vol. 6, p. 377. Faminty ERYONIDAE. 1852. Eryonidae, Dana, U.S. Expl. Exp., vol. 18, p. 515. 1901. Fa Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Macrura, p. 164 (with synonymy). South African Crustacea. 1k Gren. PENTACHELES, Bate. 1878. Pentacheles, Bate, Ann. Nat. Hist., Ser. 5, vol. 2, p. 276. 1888. 3 Bate, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 24, p. 143. 1901. * Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Macrura, pp: 260; 171. PENTACHELES GRANULATUS (Faxon). 1893. Polycheles granulatus, Faxon, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., vol. 24, pa LOT. 1894. Pentacheles beaumontit, Aleock, Ann. Nat. Hist., Ser. 6, vol. 13, p. 236, and Illustrations Zool. Investigator, Crust., pt. 2, pl. 8, fig... 1895. Polycheles granulatus, Faxon, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol 18, p. 123, pl. 32, fig. 1, pl. 33, figs. 2, 2a. 1901. Pentacheles beawmontit, Aleock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Macrura, p. 175. 1906. Polycheles granulatus, Rathbun, Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm., 1893, p. 899, fig. 54. Both specimens in the collection are small, only reaching a length of 38 or 39 mm. Unfortunately in both the first peraeopods are damaged, but the other details are well within the limits of variation shown by the descriptions which Faxon and Alcock have respectively given. The specimen more particularly examined has the small fifth peraeopod not chelate, the sixth joint being only shortly produced over the seventh, which is stated to be a male characteristic. Locality. Cape Point E. by N. 2 N. 34 miles (Cape Colony) ; depth 480 to 600 fathoms. A 1026. Trine PENAEIDEA 1888. Penaeidea, Bate, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 24, p. 219. Famity PENAEIDAE. 1881. Penaeidae, Bate, Ann. Nat. Hist., Ser. 5, vol. 8, pp. 171, 173. 1914. 1798. 1888. 1906. 1906. IOe Oa: Annals of the South African Museum. Gren. GENNADAS, Bate. . Gennadas, Bate, Ann. Nat. Hist., Ser. 5, vol. 8, pp. 171, 191. 5 Balss, Abhandl. K. Bayer. Ak. Wiss., Suppl. vol. 2, pt. 10, p. 4. $3 Stebbing, Trans. R. Soc. Hdinb., vol. 50, pt. 2, No. 9, p. 282 (with synonymy). GENNADAS KEMPI, Stebbing. Gennadas kempi, Stebbing, Trans. R. Soc. EHdin., vol. 50, pt. 2) No» 9p. 283, pl. 27. In one of the specimens with petasmata, those organs are in precise agreement with the same parts as figured for an example obtained by Dr. Bruce’s “ Scotia”? Expedition. The present specimens have more slender eye-stalks with the lateral process more produced, and the little tooth at the end of the scale of the second antennae is rather longer, but the details in general present no differences. The length of a female specimen was 31 mm., and the male with petasmata well deveioped was approximately the same. It is no doubt nearly allied to G. calmani, Kemp, which appears to be a considerably larger species, and distinguished by a prominent ventral spine on the first pleon segment in both sexes, not found in either sex of the present species. Locality. Cape Point, NE. 3 N. 47 miles (Cape Colony) ; depth 700-1,000 fathoms. A 1256. Gren. PENAEUS, J. C. Fabricius. Penaeus, J. C. Fabricius, Suppl. Ent. Syst., p. 408. PENAEUS JAPONICUS, Bate. Penaeus canaliculatus, Olivier, var. japonicus, Bate, Rep. Voy. Challenger, p. 245, pls. 31, 32, fie. 4, pl. 37, tgs 2. i, $3 Alcock, Catal. Indian Mus. - Macrura; fase. 1, p. 14, pl. 2, figs. 6, 6a-c. » japomcus, Nobili, Ann. Sci. Nat., Ser. 9, vol. 4, pp. 6, 10; i * de Man, Siboga Exp. 39a, p. 107. is Bs Balss, Abhandl. K. Bayer. Ak. Wiss., Suppl. vol: 2; pt. 10) pp: 7, 13. 1811. 1888. TOW. 1913. South African Crustacea. 13 The rostrum of the specimen is broken, but the sculpture of the carapace and the thelycum agree with Alcock’s figure, and the telson has three small lateral spines on one margin and two on the other. The length of the specimen, with allowance for the broken rostrum, may be estimated as 140 mm. Locality. Van Staden River, N. by E. 4 HE. 3 miles (St. Francis Bay, Cape Colony) ; depth 32 fathoms. A 1038. PENAEUS CANALICULATUS, Olivier. Penaeus canaliculatus, Olivier, Encycl. Méthodique, p. 660. 4s Bate, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 24, p. 243, pl. 32, figs. 1, 2. + 4 de Man, Siboga Exp., vol. 39a, p. 147. nie *, de Man, Siboga Exp., vol. 39a, pl. 9, figs. 34a, 340. Bate’s account of this species gives ‘rostrum slightly arched, furnished on the upper surface with nine teeth, the posterior of which stands on the gastric region a little unequally distant from the preceding, and one tooth on the lower margin imme- diately below the most anterior of those on the upper.” With this our specimen agrees, except in having ten teeth instead of nine, as also with Bate’s account of the telson, “acuminate and fringed with hairs at the sides; dorsal median line longitudinally channelled to the apex.’’ It agrees also with de Man’s observation that the telson is charac- terized by bearing no spinules on its lateral margins. So far as could be discovered without dissection the thelycum corre- sponds with that which de Man figures for the young female. The only point in which the specimen appears to differ from earlier descriptions regards the extension of the rostrum, which reaches beyond the dark bean-shaped eyes, but not nearly to the apex of the peduncle of the first antennae. This peduncle reaches the level of the lateral tooth of the scale of the second antennae. The scale extends some distance beyond this tooth. The flagella of the first antennae are of no great length; the upper stouter one is the shorter. The flagellum of the second antennae measured 70 mm., there- fore being longer than the body, which is only 50mm, The first peraeopods are short, nor are any of the limbs con- spicuously elongate. The inner branch of the uropods is longer than the telson and shorter than the outer branch, 14 Annals of the South African Museum. in which the marginal tooth is inconspicuous, being close to the apex of the branch. Locality. Bluff Lighthouse, SW. 5 miles; depth 15 fathoms (Durban). A 1190. PENAEUS PULCHRICAUDATUS, N. sp. Plate LXVII. The small slender specimen for which this new species is insti- tuted after long preservation in spirit was still beautifully variegated with lines of little blue spots. The nearest ally appears to be Penaeus japonicus, Bate, with which the carapace closely agrees. There are 9 dorsal spines, the hindmost remote from the rest, of which 2 are behind the orbit and the foremost rather remote from the apex and slightly in advance of the single ventral tooth. Between the fourth peraeopods there is a long adpressed spine-like ventral process, and a similar but shorter one between the fifth peraeopods. The sixth pleon segment is longer than the telson, sharply carinate, ending posteriorly in a medio-dorsal tooth, and having a smaller tooth at each postero-lateral angle. The telson is narrowly lanceolate, behind the centre having eight pairs of marginal spines, four pairs successively larger at successively smaller intervals, followed by a series of four microscopical pairs, all outflanked by the last of the large pairs and placed on the converg- ing sides of the apical tongue, which then becomes nearly parallel- sided, with a slight bulge before running out to a point. The eyes are large, dark, and bean-shaped, with a narrow ped- uncle. The two pairs of antennae are like those of P. japonicus, with which the mouth organs show much agreement, but in place of the very long terminal joint which Bate attributes to the palp of the first maxillae there are here two short joints, together shorter than Bate's long single joint. In the second maxillae the lowest lobe is notable for the paucity of setae; on the apical lobe there are 3 very short spines, and below them on the inner margin a group of denticles. In the second maxillipeds the terminal joint is shorter instead of longer than the preceding joint, and in both second and third maxillipeds the exopod is much less strongly developed than it appears in the figures of P. japonicus. This, however, may be referable to the age of the specimen. In the first, second, and third peraeopods the fingers of the chela are longer than the palm, and the confronting denticulation is more or less limited in its extent. In the first pair groups of little serrate South African Crustacea. 15 spines are present subapically on the fifth and proximally on the sixth joint. In the first pair the second and third joints carry each a strong apical spine. In the second pair only the second joint is thus provided. All the peraeopods have exopods, those on the fifth pair being very small. The fifth pair is slightly longer than the fourth, both being considerably shorter than the third. The uropods extend beyond the telson, the outer branch beyond the inner, its small terminal tooth being on a level with the apical margin. Length of specimen 45 mm., the carapace with its rostrum con- stituting about one-third of this measurement. Locality. Great Fish Point Lighthouse, N. 4 W., 2 miles (Cape Colony); depth 30 fathoms. Cn = = S - A 7 6 = ' ie A 7 = ' “a vo. 3 - M ‘. er ae ae 7 ’ 7 7 I ’ - cL = F ® ... ‘er! - - ° ‘ r : : n > = « ; = : a : _ . a i ie 7 - ad ‘ ” - 4 ; on 7 ie! 7 ' Fi - == . 7 i i i 7 “= an ‘a - e ni a - 7 5 : = ; e 7 = ih - nt a - = ~ ? a = ne 7 - > ' Cs - a 2. “=% - - - - cI Puate III. (Crustacea, Plate LXVII.) Penaeus pulchricaudatus, n. sp. car. Carapace in lateral view. d T. Telson in dorsal view, with much higher enlargement of the distal portion. mx. 1. First maxilla with terminal joints much more enlarged. mx. 2. Only the apical plate of the second maxilla, on the higher scale. mxp. 2. The second maxilliped, with higher enlargement of the three distal joints. prps. 1-5. The five peraeopods, the first with higher enlargement of the second and third joints and the exopod; the second with further enlargement of second joint and exopod; basal joints of fourth and fifth on the higher scale, with the adjoining ventral processes. urp. One of the uropods. Plate IL. Crustacea Plate LXVIL. Ann.S. Afr. Mus. Vol. XV. West, Newman lith. Del .T.R.R.Stebbing. PENAUS PULCHRICAUDATUS 7.sp. Prate IV. (Crustacea, Plate LX VIII.) Penaeopsis spinulicauda, n. sp. car. Part of carapace in lateral view. T. Telson in dorsal view. a.s. First antenna. p.m. Palp of mandible. mx. 1. First maxilla, with much higher magnification of terminal joints (the palp). mx, 2. pegens maxilla, with much higher magnification of the lobes and terminal | joint. | mxp. 1. First maxilliped, with much higher magnification of intermediate joints of the endopod. mxp. 2. Second maxilliped. plp. 1. First pleopod with the petasma, with much higher magnification of the proximal and distal ends of one of its members. plp. 2. Second pleopod. The various parts are drawn to a uniform scale, with the higher magnifications also uniform. Plate IV. Crustacea Plate LXVIIL. Ann.S. Afr. Mus.Vol. XV. West, Newman lith. tebbing. i 5 x ret pa Del TR: SPINULICAUDA 7.sp. LS op) Puate V. (Crustacea, Plate LXIX.) Parapenaeus fissurus (Bate). n.s. Specimen in lateral view, natural size, flagellum of second antennae imperfect. car. Carapace of a smaller specimen detached, to show more clearly the teeth and the fissures, with higher magnification of distal portion of the rostrum. T. The telson much enlarged. a.s. First antenna. m., mx. 1, mx. 2, mxp. Mandibles, first and second maxillae, first maxilliped, with higher magnification of the palp or apical joint of the first maxilla, and still higher of the apex in the second maxilla and the base of the flagellar portion of the first maxilliped. Plate V. Crustacea. Plate LXIX. Ann.S. Afr..Mus. Vol. XV. oH bien nae 9 i is sce: West, Newman lith. Del.T.R.R.Stebbing. PARAPENAIUS FISSURUS (Bate) Puate VI. (Crustacea, Plate LXX.) Haliporoides triarthrus, n. g. et sp. n.s. Lateral view of specimen figured above, natural size. car. Much enlarged view of the carapace. T. Apical part of the telson. m. Mandible. prp. 1. Wrist and chela of first peraeopod. Crustacea Plate LXX. Pee Nines Vol XV. Piacente Del. T.R.R.Stebbing. West, Newman lith. HALIPOROIDES TRIARTHRUS 7g. et sp. Puatse VII. (Crustacea, Plate LXXI.) Haliporoides triarthrus, n. g. et sp. li. Lower lip. mx. 1, mx. 2. First and second maxillae, with higher magnification of the apex of the endopod of the second. mxp. 1, 2, 3. First. second, and third maxillipeds, with exopod of the second more highly magnified. prp. 1,2, 3. First, second, and third peraeopods, with apices of the fingers of the third pair more highly magnified. Plazes Villy Crustacea Plate LXXI. Ann. S.Afr. Mus. Vol. XV. Sama: oe = iy I) SSN piled West, Newman lth. Del. T.R.R.Stebbing HALIPOROIDES TRIARTHRUS 7.g.et sp. Puatre VIII. (Crustacea, Plate LXXII.) Macropetasma africanus (Balss). r. Rostrum and part of carapace. T. Telson, with apex more highly magnified. m., le. Mandible and lower lip. prp.1. First peraeopod, with higher magnification of the epipod, the exopod, chela and part of fifth joint. prp. 4, prp. 5, sp., sp. Fourth peraeopods, one of the pair in its partially folded position, and fifth peraeopods with spermatophores. plp. 1, plp. 2, pet. First pair of pleopods with the petasma, part of which is more highly magnified, and second pleopods, omitting the outer ramus of one member, the vestigial ramus more and more highly magnified. cea Plate LXXII. Plate VIII. 4k a] Crus Ann.S. Afr. Mus.Vol. XV. NUS A A MA AFRIC# a ~~ MACROPBTA Pratr IX. (Crustacea, Plate LXXIII.) Eusicyonia longicauda (Rathbun). car. Carapace in lateral view, incomplete. ? T. Telson in dorsal view. a.s., a.i. First antenna and scale of second. m.,m.p.,m. Mandible with the palp detached, the other mandible with its palp oblique. li. Lower lip. mx. 1, mx. 2. First and second maxillae, the first incomplete, each with the apical plate more highly magnified. mxp. 1, mxp. 2. First and second maxillipeds. th. Thelyeum. plp. 1. First pleopod. Plate IX. Crustacea Plate LXXIII. Ann.S.Afr. Mus.Vol. XV. weet ONO reninnmeine wren ee Ai » Fae nome Caos Sines eee West,Newman lith. EUSICYONIA LONGICAUDA (Aathéun) Del. T.R.R.Stebbing. " Prate X. (Crustacea, Plate LXXIV.) Sclerocrangon bellinarleyi, n. sp. n.s. 2. Lateral view of a female specimen, natural size. car. ¢, urp., T. Carapace of male specimen, flattened out; one of the uropods, and the telson in dorsal view ; these figures to the same scale, less highly magnified than the following, but all alike taken from the male specimen. The first and second antennae, the flagellum of the second missing. m., mx. 1, mx. 2, mxp. 1, mxp. 2. and second maxillipeds. Misty isis Mandible, first and second maxillae, and first mxp. 3. Third maxilliped, ending with base of the penultimate joint. plp. 2. Second pleopod, with still higher magnification of the inner branch. Plate =e Crustaea Plate LXXIV. Ann. $. Afr. Mus. Vol. XV. eon “. IY ah " i aa 1 {7 i fi f y if ¥ F f ND i f Y owe: sherry acer fae erovensanarns et mx.i. a wae: aR GAIT Sf TEER ee a" Lo a we poner ON se ~— >> Sose ey asasial eee ae os West,Newman hth. bing- Del. T.R.R.Steb 2. Sp. SCLEROCRANGON BELLMARLEYI PuatE XI. (Crustacea, Plate LXXV.) Chlorotocus crassicornis, A. Costa. car. Part of carapace in lateral view. T. ‘Telson in dorsal view. oc. One of the eyes. m.,m. One mandible complete, with higher magnification of its molar’s apical border, the same magnification being used for the cutting edge and molar apex of the other mandible. Li., mx. 1, mxp. 2. Lower lip, first maxilla and second maxilliped on the same scale as the whole mandible. prp. 1, prp. 2. First and second peraeopods, on the same scale as the telson, parts more highly magnified, on the same scale as the whole mandible. Plate XI. Crustacea Plate LXXV. West,Newman lith. Del. T.R.R.Stebbing. CHLOROTOCUS CRASSICORNIS (A. Costa ). Pratr XII. (Crustacea, Plate LXXVI.) Stylodactylus serratus, A. Milne-Edwards. n.a. ?. Lateral view of female specimen, natural size, rostrum imperfect. Carapace of a smaller specimen, magnified; tip of the rostrum still more enlarged. T. Dorsal view of telson from the smaller specimen, with distal portion more enlarged ; the fellow to the long spine on the left is imperfectly developed. m.,m.,m. Mandibles, the uppermost figure from the female specimen, the other two from the smaller specimen, prp. 1, prp. 2. The first peraeopod and distal part of the second, from the female specimen. car. Crustacea Plate LXXVI. Plate XII. = Del. T.R.RStebbing. West, Newman lith. 7 STYLODACTYLUS SERRATUS. A.Milne-Hdwards. 2.—South African Crustacea (Part VIII. of S.A. Crustacea, for the Marine Investigations in South Africa).—By the Rev. THomas R. R. Steppine, M.A., F.R.S., F.L.8., F.Z.8., Fellow of King’s College, London, Hon. Memb. New Zealand Inst., Hon. Fellow Worcester College, Oxford. (Plates XIII-XXV. of Vol. XV. Plates LXXVII-LXXXIX. of Crustacea.) In the General Catalogue of South African Crustacea (Ann. S.A. Mus., 1910) forty-nine species were enumerated under the heading of Macrura Genuina. To this list twenty-eight species were subse- quently added (Ann. 8.A. Mus., 1914). Of the twenty-two species considered in the present essay eleven are proposed as new, one of them representing a new genus. As nineteen are additional to the two earlier lists, the total of the group in question stands for the moment at ninety-six species. In other divisions of the crusta- cean class a large number of new species have been added to the South African fauna by various authors, especially Dr. G. 8. Brady and Mr. K. H. Barnard, since the publication of the General Cata- logue. In any future revision of it attention would have also to be directed to several older species, the habitat of which in these waters as recorded by Lenz and others I overlooked. To under- take such a revision just now would perhaps be premature, and at any rate on the present occasion is not convenient. But I venture to take this opportunity of cordially thanking Mr. W. H. Bell- Marley, of Durban, for the large number of specimens with which he has favoured me during a course of years from the coast of Natal, effectively corroborating the work of Krauss, who made that coast his principal hunting ground. In addition to specimens already acknowledged in this series, Mr. Bell-Marley has sent the following :— Dehaanius dentatus (Milne-Edwards), with varieties. Blastus fascicularis (Krauss). Huena proteus, de Haan, new to S. African fauna. Pilumnus zanthoides, Krauss. 5 58 Annals of the South African Museum. Eriphia smithii, McLeay. Callinectes gladiator (Fabricius), new to 8. African fauna, Charybdis cruciatus (Herbst), small specimens. Lupa sanguinolentus (Herbst). Thalamita prymna (Herbst). Cyclograpsus punctatus, Milne Edwards. Ocypode cordimanus, Desmarest. Hymenosoma orbicularis, Desmarest, carrying a comparatively large Balanus. Matuta lunaris (Forskal). ? Leucisca squalinus, MeLeay. Clibanarius virescens (Krauss). Diogenes extricatus, Stebbing. Porcellana dehaanii, Krauss. Macropetasma africanus (Balss). Leander affinis (Milne Edwards). Alpheus edwardit (Audouin). Gonodactylus chiragra (Fabricius). Talorchestia africanus, Bate. Anthosoma crassus (Abildgaard), on old shark. New to 8S. African fauna. Balanus capensis, Darwin, on Hymenosoma orbicularis. Trine THALASSINIDHA. (See these Annals, vol. 15, pt. 1, p. 8, 1914.) Famity AXIIDAE. 1888. Azxizdae, Bate, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 24, p. 36. 1891. ». Ortmann, Zool, Jahrb., vol. 6, p. 46. 1914, af Stebbing, Ann. 8. African Mus., vol. 15, pt. 1, p. 9. Gen. CALOCARIS, Bell. (1847) 1853. Calocaris, Bell, Brit. Stalk-eyed Crust., p. 231. 1888. 3 Bate, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 24. pp. 7, 54 (Callocaris, pp. 11, 46). 1895. ie Faxon, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zodl., vol. 18, p. 105. 1900. ¥ McArdle, Ann. Nat, Hist., Ser. 7, vol. 6, p. 476. 1914. 1900. 1901. South African Crustacea. 59 Calocaris, Stebbing, Ann. 8. African Mus., vol. 15, pt. 1, TOs we Other references for the family and genus are given in the last-mentioned paper. CAaLOcARIS ALCOCKI, McArdle. Calocaris alcocki, McArdle, Ann. Nat. Hist., Ser. 7, vol. 6. p. 476. . Be Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Macrura, pp. 189, 190; Zool. Investigator, Crust., pt. 9, pl. 50, figs. 4, 4a. McArdle’s specimen, measuring 54 mm. in length, was taken in the Bay of Bengal, off Ceylon, from a depth of 542 fathoms. The description given of it essentially fits the South African example. Thus, to quote from Alcock, ‘“ the rostrum, which reaches to the end of the antennular peduncle, is up- curved and dorsally grooved; on either lateral border, near the middle, are 1 or 2 spines, and on each of the epigastric con- tinuations of the lateral borders is a single spine.” In our specimen the upturned apex of the rostrum reaches somewhat beyond the peduncle of the first antennae, but so it appears to do in the figure on Plate 50 of the Investigator’s Crustacea. It may be only an accidental coincidence, but it may be noticed that the African rostrum has 2 spines on the left margin and only 1 spine on the right. The considerable length of the penultimate joint in the peduncle of the second antennae as compared with the terminal joint should be noticed, as it is a mark distinguishing this species from the recently established C. barnardi. Only one of the flagella was preserved in the first antennae, and the same seems to have been the case with the Indian specimen, which, however, retained the flagellum of the second pair, missing in ours. No special notes are given on the mouth-organs of the Indian specimen, except that the fourth joint of the third maxillipeds “ has a subterminal spine on the inner border.” This applies equally to ours, if we accept the term spine as signifying a small unjointed tooth. In C. barnardi this tooth is also present, though much obscured by the crowded setae, but that species shows a great difference in the denticulate border of the third joint, having some nine strong teeth in place of the 28 mixed large and small which form the row in the present species, in addition to an irregu- 60 Annals of the South African Musewm. larly placed dozen of minute ones at the base. A comparison of the figures for the two species will show rather considerable differences of detail in the maxillae and other maxillipeds. But without more specimens for control it may be imprudent to lay too much stress on such details. A detached first peraeopod, beginning with the third joint, and measuring 23 mm. in length, agrees well with Alcock’s account. of the large chelipeds in the female, having the hand as long as the fourth and fifth joints combined (carpus and merus being evidently intended, in agreement with the figure, not “carpus and ischium”’ as printed), the fifth joint is two-thirds the length of the palm, and the palm is as long as the fingers; there is a terminal tooth on the lower border of the third joint and on the upper border of the fourth joint and the palm. Inthe second peraeopods the last three joints measure together 6°5 mm., equally divided between the wrist, palm, and fingers, while the fourth joint, 7°5 mm. long, exceeds the whole combination. The three following peraeopods appear to have a total length respectively of 25, 24, 21 mm., the apical part of the sixth joint in all, but especially in the fifth pair, and the fingers being copiously furnished with setae. The pleopods are perplexing. A comparison of the figures will show that the first pair in this species differs from that of C. barnardi. The second pair of the present species would, I imagine, apart from contradictory evidence, be regarded as male organs. But Alcock is evidently describing these organs when he writes: ‘‘ In the female the protopodite and endopo- dite of the second pair of abdominal appendages are long and rigid, and articulated to the tip of the endopodite is a large boot-shaped plate, its toe pointing backwards and its heel armed with a spine.” The sole, it will be seen, is fringed with spinules. In describing the family Axiidae Alcock says : ‘In the Indian species from the deep sea it is common to find orifices, corresponding with the genital orifices of the male, in adult females.” In defining the genus Calocaris he says: “The first pair of abdominal appendages are slender and uniramous in both sexes, the 2nd—5th pairs are slender and biramous, and have a slender styliform internal appendix.” This appendix I have sought in vain in the present species. The characters of the telson and uropods are sufficiently shown in the figures, the diaeresis in the exopod of the latter incomplete. South African Crustacea. 61 The total length of the specimen was about 33 mm., the carapace 13 mm. including the rostrum, the telson 4:5 mm, The plate illustrating this species is reserved for future publication. Locality. Cape Natal, N. by E., 24 miles; depth 440 fathoms. A 1550. Tre SCYLLARIDEA. This tribe, established as the ‘‘ Tribu des Scyllariens by Milne- Edwards in 1837, has been already noticed in these Annals, vol. 6, part 1, p. 28, 1908, and vol. 6, part 4, p. 372, 1910. Faminty SCYLLARIDAE. With the above-mentioned notices of the tribe will be found many references to the literature of the family. As might have been expected, the singular bodily shape and the spade-like second antennae of the ‘ Mother-lobsters’”’ have excited attention in very early times. Linnaeus, however, in 1758 was content to group all the forms then known as a single species, Cancer arctus, To deter- mine which of them, according to modern rules, has a right to the specific name arctus requires some consideration. In the Fauna Suecica, ed. 2, p. 496, No. 2040, 1761, Linnaeus again named Cancer arctus, but this time with a single reference, *“Rumph. mus. t.2.f.C. D.” These figures illustrate what were supposed to be the two sexes of Ursa-Cancer, Rumphius, as described in his D’Amboinsche Rariteitkamer, Book 1, p. 3,1705. Fig. C is now referred to Parribacus, Dana, and Fig. D to Thenus, Leach. By strict rule perhaps, therefore, arctus should be a species of one or the other of those two genera, but as the habitat is restricted to Oceano septentrionali, it is possible that Linnaeus was referring to yet a third species, an indefiniteness and confusion which may justify us in leaving the “ Fauna Suecica’’ out of account. We next come to Cancer arctus in the Systema Naturae, ed. 12, vol. 1, part 2, p. 1053, 1767. Here we have the old distribution over the four quarters of the globe and contradictory references to the two figures in Rumphius and the single figure in Browne’s Jamaica and the very different one in Seba’s Thesaurus, but the reference to the ‘‘ Fauna Suecica” is also given, and contrary to custom a comparatively full description is appended, as if drawn up from an 62 Annals of the South African Museum. actual specimen. With regard to the application of this description I asked the advice of my friend, Dr. W. T. Calman, D.Sc., who, after consulting with his colleague, Mr. C. Tate Regan, writes: ‘‘ He agrees with me that it applies very well indeed to a specimen of ‘Scyllarus arctus,’ but cannot, by any stretch of imagination, be made to fit specimens of ‘ Parribacus antarcticus’ or of ‘ Thenus orientalis.’ . . . Only S. arctus can be described as ‘aculeis inter oculos circiter 10’ or as having the carapace ‘ quinquefariam antrorsum aculeatus.’ The description of the ‘cauda’ puzzled me a good deal till Mr. Regan pointed out that the grooves on each abdominal somite except the first and last do really define three areas, the first smooth, the second rough, and the third rough and triply emarginate behind. Regan also makes the suggestion which I think probably right, that ‘digito brevissimo’ refers to a very minute tooth on the concave margin of the dactylus of the first peraeopods.”’ In 1775, as Gill, Miss Rathbun, and Sherborn have stated, Fabricius instituted the genus Scyllarus for Cancer arctus, Linn. To this genus he added the species S. australis in 1781, and again recorded these two species in 1793 (Ent. Syst., vol. 2, p. 477), with- out reference to his own earlier records or any indication that the genus was not a new one. Under S. arctus he gives the old cos- mopolitan distribution and mixture of references, as though quite unaware that they belong to a variety of species, here also as in 1781 quoting Rumph. Mus. tab. 2, fig. 6, D, by mistake for C, D. My own mistake in 1908 must be acknowledged. It consisted in accepting 1793 as the date for the genus Scyllarus and the species S. australis, in place of 1775 for the one and 1781 for the other. The year 1793, however, is rather deeply involved in the interests of the present family. For while Fabricius was leaving his genus in its primitive disorder, two of his contemporaries were independently making a systematic revision of it. Herbst (Krabben und Krebse, vol. 2, part 3, pp. 80, 82, 83, pl. 30, figs. 1, 2, 3), mentioning but not adopting Scyllarus, assigns to Cancer (Astacus) three species which he named respectively arctus, wrsus major, ursus minor. Here it should be noted that the invaluable ‘‘ Index Animalium”’ makes a slight slip by assigning these three names to 1792, which would have been correct had the descriptions occurred in part 2, ending with p. 78, but Sherborn now accepts Miss Rathbun’s date 1793 for parts 3 and 4 of Herbst’s second volume. This robs Herbst of any unquestionable precedence over N. T. Lund, who in the same year 1793 (Acta Hafn. or Skrivter af Naturhistorie-Selskabet, vol. 2, South African Crustacea. 63 part 2, p. 17, Slaagten Scyllarus) distinguished as species of Scyllarus: 1. arctus (Linn.); 2. aequinoctialis; 3. antarcticus ; 4. ortentalis. In this brief but admirable treatise Lund compares and distributes the illustrative figures from various authors, which had been so absurdly referred to a single species. At the same date Herbst gives a confused synonymy to his Cancer (Astacus) arctus (including Scyllarus arctus, Fabricius), but his description and figure make it quite clear that the species is not the Cancer arctus of Linnaeus discussed above, and further that it is the Seyllarus orientalis of Lund. Consequently, as the name arctus is preoccupied, Herbst’s species so-called becomes a synonym of Lund’s orientalis, subsequently referred to the genus Thenus, Leach. Herbst’s second species, Cancer (Astacus) ursus major, competes with Lund’s third, Scyllarus antarcticus ; since both writers agree in identifying the species with Rumph’s tab. 2, fig. C, and Seba’s tab. 20, fig. 1. Lund’s specific name is misprinted antarctcius in the Suppl. Ent. Syst. of Fabricius, 1798, and misquoted as ant- articus by Milne Edwards in 1837. The latter author gives C. wrsus, Seba, as the name applying to Seba’s pl. 20, f. 3 [error for f. 1]. But Guérin, in the description of that plate (as reproduced in 1827) writes: ‘No. 1. Ursa-cancer, seu Squilla lata, amboinensis, Seb.— Scyllarus antarcticus, Fabricius.”” De Haan (Crust. Japon., decas 5, p. 133, 1841), has already called attention to the difference of Rumph’s fig. C from others supposed to be identical. But Herbst’s figure of wrsus major and that which Milne-Edwards gives of [bacus antarcticus in the illustrated edition of the ‘‘Régne Animal,” pl. 45, fig. 3, are in good agreement, and Herbst’s specific name having been accompanied by an excellent coloured figure from the first, should have a preference over Lund’s name of the same date, but with a bare description. The species, after its transfer by Milne Edwards to Ibacus, Leach, was again transferred by Dana in 1852 to a new genus, Parribacus. Immediately after this transfer Dana proceeds to describe it as Ibacus antarcticus (Rumph), in U.S. Expl. Exp., vol. 13, p. 517, 1852, although Rumph has nothing to do with either the generic or the specific name, and was probably concerned with a different species of the genus. Herbst’s figure is without the row of tubercles down the centre of the carapace, which are conspicuous in Seba’s and Dana’s figures and faintly marked in that given by Milne Edwards; but this detail does not appear to be important. The acceptance of the name Parribacus ursus (Herbst) in place of Parribacus antarcticus (Lund) has the advantage of dis- placing a name so puzzling and inappropriate as antarcticus for 64 Annals of the South African Museum. a species recorded from the East Indies, Japan, and the Samoa Islands. There is a Cancer wrsus, Fabricius, but that does not pre- occupy the use of the specific name in the clearly different genus Cancer (Astacus). Herbst’s third species, wrsws minor, instead of being a variety of wrsws major, is accepted as a synonym of Scyllarus arctus. und’s remaining species, aequinoctialis, is the type of Scyllarides, Gill. Hence each of the four species which Lund acutely distinguished stands now under a separate generic name, Scyllarus, Scyllarides, Parribacus, Thenus. Balss in his important treatise on MHast-Asiatic Decapoda (Abhandl. K. Bayer. Ak. Wiss., vol. 10, Suppl. 2, p. 81, 1914) states that ‘ Paribaccus papyraceus Rathbun 1906,” is a synonym of ‘Paribaccus antarc- ticws (Rumph.),” in his spelling of the generic name being no doubt misled by Bate’s change of Ibacus into Ibaccus, which he also adopts, without noticing that the authors whom he cites usually follow Leach and Dana, though Parribacus is sometimes changed to Paribacus. Gen. THENUS, Leach. 1815. Thenus, Leach, Trans. Linn. Soc. London, vol. 11, p. 338. 1816. », each, Encycl. Britannica, ed. 5, Supplement, pp. 417, 419, Art. Annulosa. 1825. Scyllarus (part), Desmarest, Consid. gén. Crustacés, p. 181. 1837. Thenus, Milne Edwards, Hist. Nat. Crust., vol. 2, p. 285. 1841. i de Haan, Crust. Japonica, decas 5, p. 151. 1852, i Dana, U.S. Expl. Exp., vol. 13, p. 516. 1888. 3 Bate, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 24, pp. 56, 65. 1891. . Ortmann, Zool. Jahrb., vol. 6, p. 38. 1893. ‘ Stebbing, Hist. Crust., Internat. Sci. Ser., vol. 74, pelos: In his Zoological Miscellany, vol. 2, p. 152, 1815, Leach remarks that ‘“ [bacus is one of four distinct genera that have been confounded under the general appellation Scyllarus.” He presently instituted the genus Thenus, to which Dana added Parribacus in 1852. The characters given by Leach for distinguishing Thenus from Scyllarus were, ‘‘ Hinder legs with simple tarsi. Thorax subdepressed, broader anteriorly. Hyes inserted at the anterior angles of the thorax.” The last character is emphasized by Herbst in his description of the type species by the remark that ‘‘in no single known insect do the eyes stand so far apart.” Ortmann uses this character and the non-chelate fifth peraeopods of the female to distinguish 1705. 1758. 1775. 1793. 793. ISB Ie. 1805 1815. 1816. 1825. 1837. 1888. 1888. 1891. 1914. South African Crustacea. 65 Thenus from Scyllarus, Ibacus, and Parribacus. The mouth- parts of the different genera are described by de Haan, whose work also shows that, while there are 21 pairs of branchiae in Scyllarides, Parribacus, Ibacus, and Thenus, there are only 19 pairs in Scyllarus. As, according to Miss Rathbun, Scyl- larus americanus, S. I. Smith, is usually not more than half an inch long, great size is not an invariable characteristic of 0’ od the ‘‘ Mother-Lobsters.”’ THENUS ORIENTALIS (Lund). Ursa Cancer, Rumphius, D’ Amboinsche Rariteitkamer, vol. 1, Dp: 3, ple 2; ig. D. Cancer arctus (part), Linn., Systema Naturae, ed. 10, p. 633. Scyllarus arctus (part), Fabricius, Syst. Entom., p. 413. re a , Fabricius, Ent. Syst., vol. 2, p. 477. Cancer (Astacus) arctus, Herbst (not arctws, Linn., sensu strictiore), Krabben and Krebse, vol. 2, part 3, p. 80, pl a0; tise 4 Scyllarus orientalis, Lund, Skrivter Nat.-Hist.-Selsk., vol. 2 part 2, p. 22. 7 $ Fabricius, Suppl. Ent. Syst., p. 399. “5 Latreille, Hist. Nat. Crust. Ins., vol. 6, p. 181. Thenus indicus, Leach, Trans. Linn. Soe. London, vol. 11, p. 338. 3 a Leach, Encyel. Brit., ed. 5, Suppl., p. 419. Scyllarus orientalis, Desmarest, Consid. gén. Crust., p. 182, pl diy ise i: Thenus orientalis, Milne Edwards, Hist. Nat. Crust., vol. 2, p. 286, and Régne Animal, illustr. ed. undated, pl. 45, figs. 2a-c. A Bate, Rep Voy. Challenger, vol. 24, p. 66. oH “ de Man, J. Linn. Soc. London,. vol. 22, De 26! _ - Ortmann, Zool. Jahrb., vol. 6, p. 46. ‘ts - Balss, Abhandl. Kk. Bayer, Ak. Wiss., vol. 10, Suppl. 2, p. 80. Ortmann assigns the species to Rumph, though without using Rumph’s name for it. Jonston, Hist. Nat. de Exang- vibus aqvaticis, p. 21, pl. 4, figs. 3, 4, 8, 12, 1767, adopts the name Ursa major for three figures, 3, 4, 12, which on his 66 1850. 1884. Annals of the South African Musewm. plate are called Squilla lata, while fig. 8 is named Squilla Ursa minor, The last appears to be Scyllarus arctus, and the position of the eyes suggests that fig. 3 is intended to represent Thenus orientalis. But as Jonston’s work has been ruled out of court among treatises not consistently binomial, a discussion of his rude figures may be dispensed with. The South African specimen is in unmistakable agree- ment with the illustrations by various authors cited in the synonymy. Milne Edwards speaks of the ocular peduncles in this genus as very long, no doubt meaning comparatively rather than absolutely. They enable the small cornea to project only very slightly beyond the lateral borders of the carapace. The stomach in our specimen is protruded, as happens sometimes with animals brought suddenly to the surface from a considerable depth. The first and second segments of the pleon have each a small medio-ventral process, the second much the smaller. Length of the speci- men along the middle line, from the base of the cavity of the frontal process to the end of the telson 139 mm., breadth across front just behind the eyes 81 mm. Herbst says that the flesh of the animal is good eating, better than that of the lobster, as Rumph had observed many years earlier, though for actual comparison of flavours one would not expect Astacus gammarus to have been common in Amboyna, and Thenus orientalis, which is rare even in the East, can seldom have come to table in Germany. Locality. Amatikulu River NW. by W. 4. W. 12 miles (Natal); depth 26 fathoms. A 969. Trine PHENAEIDEA. Faminy PENAEIDAHE. (See these Annals, vol. 15, pt. 1, p. 11, 1914.) Gen. SOLENOCERA, Lucas. Solenocera, Lucas, Ann. Soc. Entomol. de France, Ser. 2, vol. 8, p. 219. 3 Koelbel, SB. Ak. Wiss., Wien, vol. 90 (1885), pt. 1 (1884), p. 314. South African Crustacea. 67 1885. Solenocera, S. I. Smith, Pr. U.S. Mus., vol. 8, p. 185. 1895. a Faxon, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zodl., vol. 18, p. 183. 1901. Ms Alcock, Catal. Indian Deep-sea Macrura, p. 19. 1908. Ae Bouvier, Camp. Sci. Monaco, fase. 33, p. 86 (with synonymy, p. 87). 1910. Er Kemp, Fisheries Ireland, 1908, 1., pp. 13, 20. TOHEL. Pe de Man, Siboga Exp., Mon., 39a, pp. 7, 45. 1914. ys Balss, Abhandl. K. Bayer. Ak. Wiss., vol. 10, Suppl. 2, p. 4. SOLENOCERA COMATUS, Nn. Sp. Plates LX XVII., LX XVIII. The carapace is scabrous, the rostrum directed straight forward, only twice as long as deep, the medio-dorsal carina having a tooth just in front of the cervical groove, followed by a series of four teeth of which the hindmost is just behind the base of the orbit and the foremost separated by a distinct interval from the apical point ; below this point the margin descends with a gentle curve adorned by a conspicuous series of plumose setae, to which the specific name alludes. Behind this series the lower margin of the rostrum is horizontal. The sides of the carapace have an antennal tooth and an antero-lateral, and on the surface a tooth a little above and behind the antennal with an apex not quite reaching the margin, and a tooth at the lower end of the cervical groove. The fourth, fifth, and sixth pleon segments are carinate, the sixth ending in a distinct tooth. The telson is shorter than the uropods, ending acutely, for nearly two-thirds of its length to the rear fringed with plumose setae, the last third narrow, with a pair of slightly divergent processes at its base which are not quite half its length. The eyes are brownish red, short, with large oval cornea, pro- tected by the first joint of the first antennae, this joint being as long as the second and third joints combined and having two small lateral teeth. The flagella are not quite twice the length of the peduncle, one flagellum about two-thirds the breadth of the other. In the second antenna the apical tooth of the scale reaches just beyond the setose margin; the flagellum (imperfect) considerably exceeds the length of the body. The mandibular palp is very large and setose, with a twist at the base of the first joint, which is decidedly wider and not shorter than the long second, that being wide at the base, distally quite narrow. The plates of the lower lip are in close contact, longer than broad. 68 Annals of the South African Musewm. The “palp”’ of the first maxilla has a series of 5 long setae on the inner margin near the apex. The apical plate of the second maxillae has at the tip of its inner margin a notable tooth carrying spines on both edges and 3 on the surface. The long sinuous endopod of the first maxillipeds has a spaced row of very long setae on its sixth joint. » The third maxillipeds are elongate, as is usual in the genus. The first peraeopods are short, the second and third joints each pro- duced into a tooth, the fourth rather longer than the fifth, the fifth longer than the sixth, the fingers rather less than twice the palm, their confronting margins armed with teeth distally for less than half the length. The cleansing apparatus of denticulate spines occurs near the apex of the wrist, and proximally on the palm. What remains of the fifth peraeopod is long and slender. The first pleon segment is ventrally produced into a_ short triangular process beset with slender spines, between the stout peduncles of the first pleopods. Of these the outer ramus is long and doubly serrate with the usual furniture of plumose setae; the inner ramus, attached much higher up, is short, pellucid, much of the feebly serrate outer margin fringed with setae, of which there are several also on the surface, while the smooth inner margin has but a single seta pointing inward near the base; the apex of this ramus is pointed, but the outer margin some way from the end forms a little oval lobe carrying a setule, before contributing to the apex proper. The inner branch of the uropods is subequal in length to the telson, and has the end ovate, fringed round with plumose setae ; the wider and considerably longer outer ramus has the outer margin straight, unarmed, its little apical tooth about on a level with the distal margin which at starting is only feebly convex. The specimen measured 46 mm., the carapace with rostrum being 15 mm., the pleon 31 mm., of which the sixth segment and the telson each accounted for6 mm. The flagella of the first antennae were about 16 mm. long, with 53 jointlets in the broader and 46 in the narrower flagellum, or thereabouts, for the counting is not easy. The imperfect flagellum of the second antenna was 60 mm. long, the third maxilliped 18 mm. Locality. 33° 6'S., 27° 55' E.; depth 43 fathoms. A 1218. Since the above description was written a male specimen from a neighbouring station has been observed, from which it will be con- venient to supply some further details. The total length was practically the same, being 47 mm. Here the medio-dorsal carina has only 4 teeth, the 2 anterior teeth being rather far from the next to South African Crustacea. 69 the rear. The hands and fingers of the second and third peraeopods are very slender, the movable finger in each case extending somewhat beyond the fixed one. The fifth peraeopod is more slender and much less setose, but longer than the fourth, the difference in length of the fourth, fifth, and sixth joints being very marked, while the fingers are subequal, but the sixth joint in the fifth pair more than twice as long as the finger, in the fourth pair not more than once and a third of the finger’s length. The petasma, when unfolded and flattened, is seen to consist of two symmetrical conjoint halves, each ending in a rather broad, roughly oval lobe fringed on the outer end with 15 little teeth or spicules and on the inner end with 8 that are blunter but still micro- scopic. Before these transverse overlapping lobes are reached, each division has on its outer (inward folding) side a longitudinal lobe ending obtusely, although a thickening of the otherwise pellucid membrane gives the appearance of an inward curled hook. The second pleopods at the base of the endopod carry a trilobed process, one lobe unarmed extended outwards, the other two downwards on the inner side, one with a furniture of setae, the other with a small fringe of setules. Locality. Nicea River, N. by W. 6 miles (near East London) ; depth 50 fathoms. A 1217. Gren. PENAEUS, J. C. Fabricius. (See these Annals, vol. 15, pt. 1, p. 12, 1914.) PENAEUS SEMISULCATUS, de Haan. 1849. Penaeus semisulcatus, de Haan, Crust. Japonica, decas 6, p: 1915 pl 46, Hie. a 1911. A 3 de Man, Siboga Exp., vol. 39a, p. 97. A specimen 148 mm. in length, with flagellum of the second antennae 245 mm. long, appears to belong to this species. It has a very small exopod on the fifth peraeopods, and the telson strongly sulcate. The petasma agrees well with that figured by Kishinouye for his P. ashiaka, which Dr. de Man identifies with P. semisulcatus, though not noticing the striking difference in length between the flagella of the first antennae as figured by Kishinouye for both sexes of P. ashiaka and those figured by de Haan for P. semisulcatus. The length represented by de Haan is exceeded by that in our specimen. 70 Annals of the South African Museum. A female 160 mm. long (with telson slightly imperfect) has a thelycum corresponding with that figured by Alcock for P, monodon, which de Man supposed later to be P. sem- sulcatus. In this specimen the rostrum has 5 small ventral teeth instead of the usual three. Locality. Delagoa Bay. A 2128-9, The specimen was obtained by Mr. K. H. Barnard in October 1912. Gen. PENAEOPSIS, A. Milne-Edwards. (For synonymy see these Annals, vol. 15, part 1, p. 15, 1914.) Ig }s}- 1906. Ona 1913. 1914. PENAEOPSIS MONOCEROS (Fabricius). Penaeus monoceros, Fabricius, Supplementum Ent. Syst., p. 409. Metapeneus monoceros, Alcock, Catal. Indian Macrura, p. 18, pl. 3, figs. 7, 7a—c. (with synonymy). Penaeopsis monoceros, de Man, Siboga Exp., vol. 39a, pp. 8, 55. de Man, Siboga Exp., vol. 39a, Suppl., pl. 6, figs. 14a-c. Balss, Abhandl. K, Bayer, Ak. Wiss., vol 10;Suppl 25 p. 7. Dr. de Man distinguishes two sections in this genus. The first, to which this species belongs, he defines as follows: “No marginal subterminal articulating spines on the telson ; last pair of thoracic legs without exopod; their merus in the adult male, with a notch and spine or tooth at its proximal end.’ The presence of this tooth in the adult male helps to distinguish this species from P. spinulicauda, Stebbing, 1914. The specimen examined has 9 dorsal teeth on the carapace, the hindmost remote from the others, the end of the rostrum slightly upturned. The carapace has a length of 37°56 mm., the rostrum from the base of the eyes accounting for 15:5 mm. ; the pleon is 68°5 mm. long, bringing the total to 106 mm. The flagellum of the second antenna measured 180 mm., this being probably its full extent, as it had to be extracted from what appeared to be secure shelter within the carapace and other parts of the animal. The slender fifth peraeopods were also protected by the carapace. Another specimen, 116 mm. long, has the flagellum of second antennae 225 mm. long, the flagella of the first pair only about 10 mm. in length. ” ”? 9? 9? South African Crustacea. Ta Locality. Delagoa Bay. A 2128-9. The specimen was obtained by Mr. K. H. Barnard in October 1912. Another specimen, female, length 163 mm., flagellum of second antennae 430 mm., was earlier obtained by Dr. Gilchrist, together with a male of nearly the same size, off South Head of Tugela River, in depth between 12 and 14 fathoms, No. 149. Tring CARIDHA. (See these Annals, vol. 15, part 1, p. 28, 1914.) Famity CRANGONIDAE. 1853. Crangonidae, Bell, British Stalk-eyed Crustacea, p. 255. 1910. - Stebbing, Ann. 8. Afr. Mus., vol. 6, p. 382 (with synonymy). 1914. He Balss, Abhandl. K. Bayer, Ak. Wiss., vol. 10. Suppl’, 2) p. GL. 1914. i Stebbing, Ann. S. Afr. Mus., vol. 15, part 1, p. 28. Gren. PHILOCHERAS, Stebbing. 1862. Cheraphilus (part), Kinahan, Proc. Royal Irish Ac., vol. 8, jolts Jb jake Ye 1900. Philocheras, Stebbing, Marine Invest. 8. Africa, Crustacea, pi. L pp. 48, 49. 1910, xf Kemp, Fisheries Ireland, 1908, pp. 135, 143. The characters of this genus are very clearly explained by Mr. Kemp, and the species now to be described shows no disagreement with his exposition. PHILOCHERAS MEGALOCHEIR, Ni. Sp. Plate LXXIX. Of British and Irish species the present makes the nearest approach to P. neglectus (Sars), considered by Kemp to be only a variety of P. bispinosus (Hailstone and Westwood). It has only a single spine behind the rostrum, but it differs from the approximate species in having a much more broadly rounded rostrum, and still more in the great size of the hand and finger of the first peraeopods, to which 72 Annals of the South African Museum. the specific name alludes. The finger is widely arched, and from its hinge the margin of the hand extends very obliquely to the widely projecting thumb, numerous setules lining the margin and resting on a membranaceous finely ribbed extension of the border. The small wrist has some little serrate spines at its inner corner, and a few of similar character are on the margin of the hand behind the thumb; otherwise these limbs are singularly devoid of any plumage, such as abundantly adorns the third maxillipeds and the much slighter second peraeopods. In the latter the hand is very insignificant, the feeble fingers much longer than the palm, which is not longer than its breadth. The telson is about three and a half times as long as its greatest breadth, tapering evenly almost to a point, but with a truncate apex just broad enough for a stout terminal spine, with a pair of much longer and more slender spines inserted in the margins just above it. The rami of the uropods are subequal in length to one another and to the telson, though from the manner of insertion the inner branch extends a little beyond the outer, and a little further still beyond the telson ; the outer ramus is squarely truncate, its outer margin ending in a very small tooth on a level with the apical border. The total length was 20 mm., of which the telson occupied 3 mm., a greater length than that of the sixth pleon segment. Localities. Cove Rock NE. 2 miles; depth 25 fathoms (near East London). A 1317. And 33° 13’ §., 27° 39’ E.; depth 37 fathoms. A 1316. Faminy PALAKMONIDAE. This family has been already considered in these Annals, vol. 6, part 1, p. 39, vol. 6, part 4, p. 383, and vol. 15, part 1, p. 30. In the first notice the new generic name Macroterocheir is proposed in place of Ortmann’s subgenus Macrobrachiuwm; in the second (a General Catalogue of South African Crustacea) five genera of the family are noted, these being, besides that just named, Palaemon, Hupalaemon, Parapalaemon, and Leander, but the species there named Leander squilla (Linn.) should, I think, rather be called L. afinis (Milne Edwards), and the result of raising Ortmann’s subgenus Hupalaemon to generic rank is to make that name a synonym of Palaemon, Fabricius, sensu strictiore. Palaemon quoianus, Milne-Edwards, can no longer stand under Palaemon thus limited, and perhaps belongs to Leander. The characters of Palaemon as restricted by Ortmann have been very fully set out by de Man in 1892 and Coutiére in 1905. South African Crustacea. 73 Gen. PALAEMON, Fabricius, s.s. 1798. Palaemon (part), Fabricius, Suppl. Ent. Syst., pp. 378, 402. 1891. Hupalaemon (subgenus), Ortmann, Zool. Jahrb., vol. 5, pp:-696; 697; 1892. Md os de Man, in Max. Weber’s Zool. Ergeb. Niederl. Ost.-Indien, volo2,, ps 4103 1902. Pe " de Man, Abhandl. Senck. Nat. Gesellsch., vol. 25, pt. 3, p. 763. 1904. sh - de Man, Trans. Linn. Soe. London, volo pt. 8: p: 29: 1905. es ‘ Coutiére, Ann. Sci. Nat., Ser. 8, vol. 12, pp. 263, 273. AO iste - S de Man, Notes from Leyden Mus., vol. 33, p. 281. 1912. s ? de Man, Rev. Zool. Africaine, vol, [i pte 3; p. 413. 1912. - - de Man, Ann. Soe. Zool. Belgique, Vol, 46) (191d) Spa Lore PALAEMON suNDaICUS, Heller. (See these Annals, vol. 6, pt. 4, p. 384, 1910.) The distinction of species in this family has been made largely to depend on the size, shape, and denticulation of the rostrum, the roughness or smoothness of the carapace and limbs, the relative proportions of various joints, details in the shape and armature of the chelae, and even on the position of small spines pertaining to the telson. Unfortunately for the systematist several of these characters are found to vary with the age or sex of individuals, and in some of these they may be obscured by wear and tear or by natural abnor- mality. While, therefore, it may be easy to say that such and such a species has been found in this or that locality, it may be a tedious business to confirm the statement. The specimen here assigned to Heller’s species is 100 mm. long, the carapace with the rostrum measuring 45 mm., and the telson 13 mm., equalling the length of the fifth and sixth pleon segments combined. The slightly imperfect rostral carina carries 10 or 11 dorsal teeth, much the longest interval being between the foremost 2 or 3 teeth and that next behind them; two of the teeth are behind the orbits ; among the setules of the ventral margin 3 small teeth 6 74 Annals of the South African Musewm. could be felt. The carapace is very stout, with the hinder peraeo- pods contiguously paired beneath. The first peraeopods are very slender, with the wrist 14 mm. long, twice as long as the chela, the fingers of which are longer than the palm. The second peraeopods are both detached, one imperfect, but the remainder like its companion, these limbs being dark in colour, with none of the joints dilated, but the palm rather stouter than the wrist, that with the end unbroken measuring 126 mm. for the last 5 joints, com- posed as follows, beginning with the 3rd joint, 15, 24, 33, 54,27 mm., the last of them, the finger, not adding to the length, as it closes accurately over the thumb which equals the palm in length and forms a very obtuse angle with it. The third, fourth, and fifth peraeopods are subequal, but the fifth rather the longest, all extending beyond the scale of the second antennae. The flagellum of these antennae attains a length of 153 mm., the longest flagellum of the first antennae (perhaps a little imperfect) measuring 118 mm. The uropods extend a little beyond the telson, and their exopod a little beyond the endopod. Locality. Umlaas River, Natal; obtained by Dr. Gilchrist from salt water. A 1252. PALAEMON DELAGOAE, 0. sp. Plate LXXX. The present species may be regarded as a link between P. macrobrachion, Herklots, and P. sollaudiw, de Man, 1912, on both of which the latter author has bestowed so much accurate attention. In the form here assumed to be new the rostral carina has 5 ventral teeth, 9 dorsal, of which 2 are behind the orbit, and the foremost 3 are rather widely spaced; the oblique apex is perhaps imperfect. The carapace with rostrum measures 34°5 mm., the telson 10 mm., the intermediate part about 35°5 mm., thus giving a total of 80 mm. The slender first peraeopod is 34 mm. long. The right-hand second peraeopod has a total length of 108 mm., the 3rd joint 14 mm., 4th 19 mm., dth 35°5 mm., the 6th 89 mm. In the 6th the palm counts for 25 mm., the thumb for 14 mm., the finger being only 13 mm. does not quite reach the thumb’s apex; both are furred on their opposed margins. The second peraeopod on the left is decidedly shorter than its companion, the thumb (perhaps slightly imperfect) not reaching beyond the finger. Both of these limbs can with difficulty be seen to carry lines of microscopic prickles. The peduncle of the first antennae does not reach the end of the scale of the second, South African Crustacea. 75 and that scale falls a little short of the rostral apex. The mandible has a slender three-jointed palp, a tridentate incisor plate and a prominent molar ending in a group of three strong teeth. The palp of the first maxillae is apically deeply bifid. The telson has a pair of dorsal spines at the middle, two pairs on the sides of the triangular apex, the outer pair very small, a group of feathered setae extending beyond the inner pair; microscopic prickles fringe the lateral margins, and perhaps extend over much of the surface. Of the intermediate pair of dorsal spines the left-hand spine could not be discerned. Locality. Mouths of rivers flowing into Delagoa Bay yielded a single specimen, named after the bay. A 2196. Gen. LEANDER, Desmarest. (See the General Catalogue of South African Crustacea, 1910, in these Annals, vol. 6, p. 386, where for Leander squilla should, I now think, be read Leander affinis (Milne Edwards). See also Trans. R. Soc. Edinb., vol. 50, p. 286, 1914, and these Annals, vol. 15, p. 81.) LEANDER PERINGUEYI, 0. sp. Plate LXXXI. This species belongs to the section of the genus in which the palp of the mandible is three-jointed, in company with L. serratus (Pennant), L. affinis (Milne Edwards), L. adspersus (Rathke). But from all the congeneric forms with which I am acquainted it is dis- tinguished by its peculiar rostrum. A small tooth on the carapace is followed at a well-marked interval by a series of 4 teeth, suc- cessively larger, the hindmost of them slightly behind the base of the eyestalk ; to these again at an interval succeeds a series of 3 small teeth successively smaller, leading to a slightly upturned apex, broad in lateral aspect, its ventral margin receding to a broad cavity formed by a curved acute process at some distance to the rear, with no other ventral teeth except a microscopic spinule between the apex and the cavity. The telson is sharply carinate for half its length, twice as broad at its base as distally at the base of its little acute apical triangle, this base being furnished with a pair of long spines, between which are two rather longer setae, while they are flanked by a pair of much smaller spines. From the 2 pairs of dorsal spines normally to be expected, one spine of the upper pair is wanting in this specimen. In the first antennae the second and third joints are subequal in 76 Annals of the South African Museum. length, the first longer than both combined; the flagella, not abso- lutely perfect, show a length of about 40 mm. for the stouter, and about 30 mm. for the slighter, the small third flagellum which sepa- rates from the former, has a free course of about 22 joints, together equal in length to the first joint of the peduncle. The incisor process of one mandible shows 4 teeth, that of the other only 3; the palp is very slender, the third joint longer than the first and second combined. The inner lobe of the apical plate or palp of the first maxillae is armed at the inner corner with a little spine which is twisted outwards, but this and various other details of the mouth-organs occur similarly in L. afinis. At the apex of the third maxilliped that species has a single strong spine, where the present specimen has two such spines, but the variation may be a casual one. In the first peraeopods the fifth joint is nearly twice as long as the chela; in the second pair the fingers are about five-sixths the length of the palm. The specimen, a female laden with eggs, had a total length of 66 mm., the carapace with rostrum accounting for 23 mm., and the telson for a little over 8 mm. Locality. 33° 49'S. lat., 25° 56’ E. long. A 1276. The specific name is given as a mark of respect to Dr. Péringuey, Director of the South African Museum and Editor of these Annals. LEANDER GILCHRISTI, n. sp. Plate LXXXII. This species differs, so far as I can find, from all other forms in the genus by having a good-sized distal tooth both on the dorsal and ventral margins of the rostrum, advanced nearly as far as the slightly upturned acute apex; there are in all 7 dorsal teeth, the hindmost situated on the carapace a little remote from the next, which is slightly behind the base of the orbit; the three anterior are a slightly larger group than the three behind, and correspond pretty precisely with the three ventral teeth. The telson is in very close agreement with that of L. peringueyi, but the apex is more abruptly narrowed, and the accompanying plumose setae are shorter instead of longer than the two long spines between which they extend. All four dorsal spines are present, but, as the figure shows, not symmetrically arranged, those on the left being wider apart than those on the right. South African Crustacea. 77 In the first antennae the teeth of the first joint are wider apart than in the other species, and the short flagellum separates from its companion sooner, the common portion showing only six instead of nine components; the companion (seemingly almost complete) is about four times as long. The mouth-organs show no differences of any apparent import- ance, unless it be that the present specimen shows less expansion at the base of the exopod in the first maxillipeds and less flexure of the antepenultimate joint of the third pair. In the first peraeopods the fourth and fifth joints are here rather shorter in relation to the third joint and the chela, and in the second peraeopods the fifth joint is here not longer than the palm of the chela. The total length of the specimen, a female with eggs, was 57 mm. Locality. Kast London wood, where, as long ago as April 4, 1900, it was taken by Dr.J. D. F. Gilchrist, after whom I have the pleasure of naming it. Gren. PALAEMONETES, Heller. 1869. Palaemonetes, Heller, Zeitsch. wiss. Zool., vol. 19, p. 157. 1890. A Ortmann, Zool. Jahrb., vol. 5, p. 513. 1904. re Rathbun, Decap. Crust. N.W. coast of N. Amer., p. 30. 1906. a Norman and Scott, Crust. Devon and Cornwall, p. 20 (with synonymy). 1910. . Kemp, Fisheries Ireland, 1908, pp. 127, 132. 1912. AS Rathbun, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool, vol. 54, p. 401. In 1899 Borradaile instituted a genus Palaemonopsis for a specimen from New Britain, agreeing with Palaemonetes in the absence of a mandibular palp, but differing from it in having on each side of the carapace one antennal spine only. In these two respects the specimen about to be described agrees with Palaemonopsis, but differs so considerably from it in the first antennae and the second peraeopods that it cannot safely be assigned to that genus. On the other hand, with the first and third peraeopods missing, I am unwilling to found upon it another genus while the much-needed revision of the family Palaemonidae, to which Mr. Kemp has called attention, is still in abeyance. 78 Annals of the South African Museum. PALAEMONETES NATALENSIS, 0. sp. Plate LXXXIII. The dorsal teeth of the carapace are eleven in all, three behind the base of the orbit, followed by seven in close succession on the rostrum, but the two foremost more widely spaced than the rest, and finally a longer interval leading to a denticle just in advance of the apex; the three ventral teeth nearly correspond in position with the dorsal three behind the denticle. The sixth pleon segment is much longer than the fifth. The telson is nearly three and a half times as long as its greatest breadth, narrowing evenly to a shallowly triangular apex, the median point flanked by two small spines, out- side of which is a much larger pair, with a very small pair at the corners similar to two lateral pairs, one about at the middle of the telson’s length, the other intermediate between that and the apex. In the first antennae the third joint is less than twice as long as broad, shorter than the second, both combined much shorter than the first, which has an apical tooth, the basal spine reaching little beyond the middle of the joint and scarcely beyond the globular cornea of the eye; the stouter flagellum with its longer branch is considerably longer than the peduncle ; the shorter branch, which is also rather the stouter, 1s subequal in length to the part from which both branches spring, and combined with that part gives a length equal to the peduncle; the more slender independent flagellum equals in length the stouter in combination with its longer branch. The proportions of these flagella in Palaemonetes varians (Leach) and Palaemonopsis willeyi, Borradaile, differ markedly from those just described. The scale of the second antennae differs little from that of P. varians, the flagellum, which is incomplete, could scarcely have been the full length of the body. The incisor process of the mandible has three unequal teeth. The palp of the first maxilla is apically bilobed, with a little upturned tooth or spinule on the inner lobe. In the second maxillae the lacinia interna is not produced into lobes, the median lobes are very slender, and the apical plate is unarmed. In the second maxillipeds the second and third joints are completely fused, the large sixth joint a little outflanks the large transversely attached and strongly fringed seventh. The antepenultimate joint of the third maxillipeds is long and curved, the exopod reaching nearly to its apex. First peraeopods unknown; the second have the fourth joint about as long as the first three combined, considerably longer than the South African Crustacea. 79 fifth joint or carpus, which in turn is a little longer than the slender chela; proportions, quite unlike those in the two species above com- pared ; the fingers close tightly together and are subequal in length to the palm; there are several groups of setae on the fixed finger, and a group near the apex of the carpus. The fourth and fifth peraeopods are nearly alike, the long fourth and sixth joints sub- equal in length, but decidedly less than twice as long as the fifth joint without reckoning the little lobe by which that overlaps the sixth ; the finger is very small and curved, about a tenth as long as the sixth joint. A little tooth precedes its upturned point, but this may be in preparation for the moult. The first pleopod has a very short inner branch. The branches of the uropods are broad, the outer one a little the longer, much extended beyond the little apical tooth of the outer margin. Total length 32 mm., carapace with rostrum 12-5 mm. Locality. Cape Natal N. by E. 24 miles ; depth 440 fathoms. A 1275. The specimen had a very uninviting appearance, as if covered in all directions by a sort of scurf. This, however, was easily removed, and eventually proved to consist chiefly of the ova of some Epi- caridian, together with the larvae in great numbers, minute objects considerably less in total length than half a millimeter, otherwise in close agreement with the figures given by Sars (Crustacea of Norway, vol. 2, pl. 94) for the male larvae of Dajus mysidis (Kroyer). Faminy ALPHEIDAE. 1888. Alpheidae, Bate, Rep. Voy. Challenger, vol. 24, p. 528. 1899. a Coutiére, Thése a la Faculté des Sciences Paris (with bibliography), Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool., Ser. 8, vol. 9. 1899. - Borradaile, Willey’s Zool. Results, pt. 4, p. 416. t9O Pe Alcock, Indian Deep-sea Macrura, p. 139. 1905. 4 Coutiére, Fauna Maldive-Laccadive Archip., vol. 2, pt. 4, p. 852. USANA Ee ; de Man, Siboga Exp., vol. 39a’, p. 135 (Suppl. Plates, 1913). 1913. 5 Zimmer, Zool. Jahrb., Suppl. 11, pt. 3, p. 381. 1914. be Balss, Abhandl. K. Bayer. Ak. Wiss., vol. 10, Suppl. 2, p. 37. Through the above-cited authorities numerous other refer- ences may be traced. 80 Annals of the South African Museum. Gren. ALPHEUS, Fabricius. 1798. Alpheus, Fabricius, Suppl. Ent. Syst., pp. 380, 404. Notice has been already taken of this genus in the General Catalogue, South African Crustacea, part 5, 1910. The litera- ture discussing it is very extensive. ALPHEUS NOTABILIS, 0. Sp. Plates LXXXIV., LXXXY. The interesting specimen here described, besides being solitary, was without flagellum to the second antennae, had only one member of the first pair of peraeopods, neither of the second pair, and only one representative for each of the three following pairs. All the limbs were detached, but as there was no other specimen in the bottle there can be no reasonable doubt that the limbs belonged to the body which they accompanied. The rostrum protrudes from between the raised and distally rounded eye-lobes and its carina is continued along two-thirds of the carapace. The covered eyes are dark and sub-rotund. In the first antennae the second joint is nearly as long as the first and two and a half times as long as the third; the shorter flagellum has its thickened part about half as long as its slender companion, with a slender 12-jointed continuation equal to nearly a third of the pre- ceding length; this is composed of 26 joints, only the last of them having a freely projecting tip, which carries two long sensory filaments, 19 pairs of filaments being distributed over 9 joints. The well-marked apical tooth of the bent and strongly plumose scale of the second antennae just reaches the apex of the plumose portion. The incisor process of the mandible has one rather large tooth between three or four much smaller teeth above and five very minute ones below; the powerful molar is fringed with combs or brushes of hair-like teeth ; the palp with seta-fringed second joint is bent as usual on to the inner surface of the mandible. The palp of the first maxillae has a bilobed apex, with a single spine on the tip of the inner lobe. The corresponding joint of the second maxillae is small with a spinule at the narrow apex and a few setae low down on the outer margin. In the slender terminal part of the endopod of the first maxilliped the jointing is obscure. In the second maxillipeds there is a very large branchial plate attached to the first joint, the second and third joints are completely coalesced, the part representing the third joint being distally expanded, the sixth is South African Crustacea. 81 strongly dilated above the fifth, and the transversely apposed seventh is strongly spined. The third maxillipeds have the ante- penultimate joint long and twisted, the penultimate distally expanded beyond the insertion of the last joint; this inward expansion carries a group of straight setae extending beyond the last joint, which is more than twice the length of the penultimate and itself very copiously furnished with long setae. The first peraeopod, which from its structure is no doubt the smaller cheliped of the present species, is remarkable alike for its setose furniture and the great length of the hand. The character naturally suggested a comparison with Alpheus longimanus, Bate (Rep. Voy. Challenger, p. 551, pl. 98, fig. 4), a species which I cannot find mentioned in Dr. de Man's admirable monograph of the family, nor indeed by any other authority since its publication. Bate declares that the second peraeopods have the ‘“carpos six- articulate,’’ which would be a very important feature, were not the importance discounted by the circumstance that his figure clearly shows the wrist normally five-jointed. In the first antennae he represents the shorter flagellum as much less than half the length of the other, and in the second antennae the long joint of the peduncle overtops the scale, whereas in our specimen it does not reach the top of it. In the smaller first peraeopod Bate describes the fingers as “nearly, and in some instances quite, as long as the propodos,”’ meaning of course the palm. In our species the fingers are very considerably shorter than the palm, and the fringes of very long setae with which fingers and palm are alike begirt are exceedingly notable. The fourth joint on the outer edge is as long as the palm, and on the inner edge near the base shows four slender spines and is lightly fringed with setae. The third and rather shorter fourth peraeopods have each the sixth joint fringed with long setae; the more slender fifth has the distal half of the sixth joint’s inner margin fringed with more than twenty little groups of setae, increasing in size as they approach the straight pointed finger. The first pleopods have the inner ramus very short, both rami fringed with long setae. In the second pair the inner ramus is longer than the outer, with a long slender retinaculum. In both pairs the peduncle is elongate, with stout setae above and below on the inner margin for holding the ova. The uropods are very broad and strongly plumose, the outer ramus rather the longer, a diaeresis ending in a small tooth low down. The telson is peculiar in shape, narrowing a little above the middle, at five-sixths of the length each 82 Annals of the South African Museum. lateral margin ending in a little tooth, the remaining sixth forming a half oval fringed with 14 pairs of long plumose setae. The total length of the body was 30 mm., the carapace being 10 mm. long and the telson 5 mm. Locality. Delagoa Bay, the specimen obtained by Mr. K. H. Barnard.