| Ei er EN daar AL! ‘i sige al et ut, “i, Mi one a Pee PONS Gi ae e i ns a POLE ah ap ee / PUBLIC: DOCUMENT. ...C BERLIN COLLMGRNoO,! 73: DEP Ar’ PMIENTD OF ZOOLMHSY FIRST ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT FOR SUPPRESSING THE GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. BOSTON : WRIGHT & POTTER PRINTING CO., STATE PRINTERS, 18 Post OFFICE SQUARE. Q L 1906. WON UU A 0 0301 O0b57976b & PUBEIC DOCUMENT... . et Onto: FIRST ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SUPERINTENDENT FOR SUPPRESSING THE GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. BOSTON : WRIGHT & POTTER PRINTING CO., STATE PRINTERS, 18 Post OFFICE SQUARE. 1906. = ’ , 43 ‘ xg — a a - o— : ; —~ > «CU 7 1 aa - : 2 ok Y Pe a ~ 2 t 7 A J ie ve APPROVED BY | Tuer STATE BOARD OF PUBLICATION. be " ; “ i 7 » 7 , ; fe YY SEG lw—ti( ‘i ‘i i‘i;C~C~;™; Commontvealth of Massachusetts. To the Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. I present herewith for your consideration the report of the Superintendent for Suppressing the Gypsy and Brown-tail Moths. This report is submitted in accordance with the provisions of chapter 381, Acts of 1905, and contains a statement of the results accomplished to date, together with a record of expenditures and certain recommendations bearing on the future needs of the work. A. H. KIRKLAND, Superintendent. Boston, Jan. 1, 1906. Eee Co Stee See ae ORGANIZATION. . H. KrrKkuanp, MS., .-M, ROGERS, A. FARLEY, . A. BATES, W. ENWRIGHT, . W. MINOTT, . H. WoORTHLEY, Superintendent. Assistant Superintendent. Secretary. Field Agent, Southern Division. Field Agent, Northern Division. Field Agent, Wesiern Division. Field Agent, Eastern Division. 6 OOS Commontoealth of Massachusetts. THE GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. The gypsy and brown-tail moths in their caterpillar stage are well-known European pests of fruit, shade and forest trees. As far back as authentic records exist, both insects have been notably injurious at times in various sections of central and southern Europe. The gypsy moth has made itself felt perhaps more as a general pest of trees of all kinds, while the brown-tail moth is more common as an enemy of fruit trees. In fact, the latter insect is known in France as ‘‘ la commune,” the com- mon caterpillar. So common are both insects, and so im- portant have been their intermittent ravages, that the very earliest writings on European entomology contain mention and often full discussions of their habits and of the remedies best suited to counteract their attacks. At times their ravages have so increased as to become of historic impor- tance; then subsiding for a term of years, possibly even for a generation, they have increased again to noteworthy mag- nitude. The caterpillar plagues resulting from the unre- stricted multiplication of these insects have often caused the enactment of stringent legislation in many European countries, and at other times their ravages have been even sufficient to cause official days of prayer and fasting. The brown-tail moth has been officially under the ban of the Church, as witness the edict at Grenoble, France, in 1543, whereby the insect, which had stripped the trees of the city and poisoned many of the inhabitants, was treated as one of the works of the Evil One. Later in the same 8 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. century Chorier records a legal injunction issued by the attorney-general of the province of Dauphiny, whereby the insects were ordered to ‘‘ forsake and abandon the fields ” where they were feeding. Curtis published in 1782 a quaint account of an outbreak of the brown-tail moth near London, whereby ‘‘ the inhabitants were thrown into the utmost con- sternation. An appearance so extraordinary was calculated to create terror; it was naturally interpreted as a visitation from heaven, ordained to deprive men and cattle of their food and finally leave them a prey to famine” (Donovan). The alarm of the public was so great and prevailed to such an extent that prayers were offered in the churches to avert the calamity. The history of the gypsy moth in Europe and.Asia is equally full of striking incidents. Thus in 1720 Frisch records the stripping ‘‘ of a double row of lindens from Neustadt to Berlin,” while Schaeffer mentions the defoliation of entire forests in 1752 in Altenburg, Leitz, Naumburg and elsewhere as a result of the unchecked ravages of the gypsy moth caterpillars. ‘Some of the common people thought the caterpillars grew out of the ground like grass; others thought they were created by the Evil One; still others assured the writer that they had seen thousands of caterpillars brought by the wind; and finally there were many who thought these insects were sent as a punishment for their ’ The stripping and serious damage to the cork oaks of southern France are recorded in 1731 by Brown, and a repetition of this injury occurred in 1818. Daudeville in 1828 described an outbreak extending over sixty miles near Saint Quentin, where the caterpillars « completely devastated the trees so that they were entirely bare.” Later writers, like Ratzeburg, Bazin, Taschenberg, Portchinsky and Koeppen, have recorded notable outbreaks of the gypsy moth in Ger- many and Russia. Instances like the foregoing, authenti- cated by well-known entomologists, suffice to establish the status of the pest in its native region. It should be stated, however, that, in the careful study of the European literature bearing on this subject made by the writer several years ago, it was a significant fact that the history of any particular sins.’ ‘ezIS OJIT soun’y ITV ‘1eysnjo B80 Surke] you olewme7q ‘Ee ‘Bang 3 ‘SIB[TId109v0 UMOIS-][N,T ‘T ‘qyour AsdAS 943 Jo sesvis snowe, 1906. | PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. 9 ” outbreak did not extend over more than three or four years ; in other words, at the end of that period the moth was checked by natural causes and its damage subsided. THe Gypsy Morn. In 1868 a French scientist, Prof. Leopold Trouvelot, then residing at Medford, Mass., imported egg clusters of the gypsy moth to use in certain experiments with silk-produc- ing insects. The manner in which the moth escaped from his care could not be determined by correspondence with Professor Trouvelot after his return to France, but the late Alvan Clark, the well-known lens maker of Cambridge, who saw Trouvelot at Meudon, France, a short time before his death, was told by him that he had the caterpillars netted in on a shrub in his yard at Medford, and that during a gale the netting was torn and the insects scattered. It is a matter of record that he realized the importance of this catastrophe and promptly notified the public through the entomological magazines of that time. No attention appears to have been paid to this note of warning, and the insect, once becoming established, multiplied with increasing rapidity, until in the late eighties its ravages became notable in certain restricted districts of Medford and Malden. By 1889 the moth had become so abundant in southern Medford that the trees were completely stripped, and the caterpillars were forced to swarm outward in all directions in search of food. During this year specimens of the insect were sent to the Hatch Experiment Station at Amherst, where, in the absence abroad of Prof. C. H. Fernald, they were identified by his son, Dr. H. T. Fernald, as caterpillars of the notorious gypsy moth of the Old World. After a vain struggle with the pest, the citizens of the affected communities petitioned in 1890 for legislation for its extermination, and similar action was taken by the State Board of Agriculture, the Essex County Horticultural Society and the Massachusetts Horticultural Society. The matter was presented to the Legislature by Governor John Q. A. Brackett, and on March 14, 1890, he approved the first act authorizing work against the moth, and carrying an appro- 10 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. priation of $25,000. The work of combating the insect was begun by a commission consisting of W. W. Rawson of Arlington, Dr. Pearl Martin of Medford and J. Howard Bradley of Malden. The early work of the commission soon developed the fact that the territory occupied by the moth was much greater than had been supposed, and the matter was again presented to the Legislature, with the result that an additional appropriation of $25,000 was made June 3, 1890. The following year another commission, consisting of Prof. N. S. Shaler of Harvard University, Gen. F. H. Appleton and the Hon. W. R. Sessions, all members of the State Board of Agriculture, and the last named the secretary of the Board, was appointed by Governor W. E. Russell to direct the work. After a few weeks this commission was superseded by the State Board of Agriculture, which by a special committee, composed at first of the above-mentioned gentlemen, carried on the work against the gypsy moth from May 19, 1891, to Feb. 1, 1900, during which time the active field operations were under the direction of the well- known naturalist, Mr. E. H. Forbush, while the scientific and technical work was directed by Prof. C. H. Fernald. Without going into details, it may be said that the work by the committee of the Board of Agriculture, while dependent upon annual appropriations of the Legislature and often seriously delayed and restricted for lack of funds, was pros- ecuted with varying degrees of success until in 1899 the gypsy moth was completely under control throughout the district. THe Brown-tarm Morn. This insect found its way to Somerville, Mass., in the early nineties. The evidence bearing upon its importation is entirely circumstantial, but it is matter of record that in the centre of the original brown-tail moth colony there is a florist’s establishment which for years made a specialty of importing roses from abroad. It is also well known that the brown-tail moth spins its winter webs on rose bushes. Since the original infestation was located in a pear orchard adjoining the field where these foreign roses had been culti- vated for several years, there is strong presumptive evidence 1906.] PUBLIC DOCUMENT— No. 73. 11 that the moth was brought over on these plants. The insect seems to have multiplied unnoticed for a few years in a restricted area, but in the spring of 1897 it gained sufficient headway to show itself as a serious pest in Somerville and in a few localities in Malden, Everett and Revere. The gypsy moth employees of the Board of Agriculture did a small amount of work against the insect in 1897 while the cater- pillars were swarming, but this was discontinued after the Legislature declined to take action in the matter. In 1898 and again in 1899 $10,000 was, by vote of the Legislature, set apart from the larger appropriations for work against the gypsy moth for the purpose of combating the brown-tail moth. This additional work was carried on under the direction of the Board of Agriculture. THe FormMER STATE WORK BROUGHT TO A CLOSE. At the close of 1899 the work against the gypsy moth was well in hand. Effective methods had been developed and their value proven; a trained and well-disciplined corps of men had been organized; the boundaries of the infested district had been determined with much accuracy ; the street trees of the region had been freed from the caterpillars and their consequent spreading checked; the woodland colonies had been given a severe scourging and in some cases anni- hilated; the moths had been exterminated in many places ; in short, the gypsy moth pest had been so thoroughly brought under control that a general state of apathy toward the work existed throughout the district which but a decade before had been swept by caterpillar hordes. In 1900 the Legislature, through a special committee, investigated the management and general policy of the Board of Agricul- ture’s operations against the moth and came to the conclu- sion that a continuance of such work along these lines was unnecessary. The report of this committee argued that the gypsy moth need not be considered a serious pest: ‘¢ We find no substantial evidence that gardens, crops or woodlands have suffered serious or lasting injury, or are likely, with that proper precaution or oversight which pru- dent owners are disposed to give to their own interests, 12 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. to be subjected to that devastation which one would have a right to anticipate from these reports. . . . It appears to us that the fears of the farmers throughout the State have been unnecessarily and unwarrantably aroused, evidently for the purpose of securing the effect of those fears upon the matter of the annual appropriations. . . . We do not share these exaggerated fears, and the prophecies of devas- tation and ruin are unwarranted, and in the most charitable view are but the fancies of honest enthusiasts.”! While the committee recommended the continuation of the work on lines somewhat similar to those of the present act, the prac- tical result of this report was the refusal of the Legislature to make any appropriation, and the State work was brought to a close. UNRESTRICTED INCREASE OF THE MoruH. As would have been expected, during the years 1900 and 1901 but little notable damage was caused by the gypsy moth, although evidence was not wanting to the trained observer that it was rapidly multiplying in woodlands and on neglected private estates. It was apparent that non-resident property owners particularly paid practically no attention to the increase of the insect, and that farmers and others own- ing infested woodland areas were unwilling, because of the expense, to fight the pest. In 1902 numerous estates were severely injured throughout the central district, while wood- land colonies of some magnitude had developed from which the insects were swarming in all directions. The summer of 1903 showed that the moth had established itself again in alarming numbers in various parts of the infested district. Serious colonies had developed in the woods of Arlington, Medford, Saugus and Malden, and the Lynn Woods colonies had assumed notable proportions. In 1904 it was apparent to all that the gypsy moth had developed to a remarkable degree, reinfested the areas from which it had been cleared and even extended its bounds into previously non-infested territory. The caterpillar outbreak was sufficient to con- 1 From report of special committee appointed to inquire into the state of the work of exterminating the gypsy moth. — House, No. 1138, March, 1900. ‘GOBI ‘oung ‘sav{{Idiey¥v0 Gout AsdAS Aq poiejsvaop ‘UO4SsUITLY ‘yIVq Ssyooy AWOJoUSW 1906. ] PUBLIC DOCUMENT—No. 73. 13 vince every tree lover of the necessity of concerted action against the moths. While in many places in the afilicted district the trees under the charge of municipal authorities were cared for with considerable success, private estates and woodlands in June and July presented shocking scenes of devastation. In many places the work of fire could not have been more thorough or alarming. From Belmont to Saugus and Lynna continuous chain of woodland colonies presented a sight at once disgusting and pitiful. The hungry cater- pillars of both species of moths swarmed everywhere ; they dropped on persons, carriages, cars and automobiles, and were thus widely scattered. They invaded houses, swarmed into living and sleeping rooms and even made homes un- inhabitable. Thousands of cases of poisoning of human beings resulted from the swarming of the brown-tail cater- pillars. Real estate in the worst infested districts underwent a notable depreciation in value. Worst of all, pines and other conifers — altogether too scarce in eastern Massachu- setts — were killed outright by the gypsy moth caterpillars, while shade trees and orchards were swept bare of foliage. Property owners who were disposed to care for their own estates suffered and became discouraged from the neglect of their neighbors. It was evident that the moth pests were in the ascendency, and that they could be controlled only by prompt, thorough and systematic effort. The experiences of the caterpillar season of 1904 resulted in the formation of various local associations, with the object of securing co-operative work against the moths among citizens of the several municipalities. Notable stimulus to public opinion followed the visit to the infested district, in the summer of 1904, of Prof. C. L. Marlatt, first assistant of the Bureau of Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture. After spending three weeks in an exami- nation of the district, Professor Marlatt was outspoken in urging the necessity of renewing work against the moths on some comprehensive plan, which would secure the co-opera- tion of the individual property owner, the municipality and the State. Asa result of the various forces working toward a common end, late in 1904 the several local village im- 14 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. provement and anti-moth societies were organized into the Massachusetts Association for the Suppression of the Gypsy and Brown-tail Moths, under the presidency of the Hon. George R. Jones of Melrose, recently president of the Massachusetts Senate. A strong effort was made to har- monize conflicting ideas as to how best to proceed against the moth pest; and the efforts of the association, with the co-operation of the State Board of Agriculture, the Massa- chusetts Forestry Association and various other interested organizations and of individuals, finally resulted in the pres- entation of a bill to the Legislature to provide for the sup- pression of the gypsy and brown-tail moths. This bill, with various amendments, is the act under which the present work is carried on. It was signed by His Excellency Governor W. L. Douglas on May 8, 1905. ScoPpE AND PURPOSE OF THE ACT. The underlying purpose of the present act (chapter 381, Acts of 1905) in relation to the gypsy and brown-tail moths is to secure the co-operation of the individual, the city or town and the State, each bearing a share of the responsibility for the work and each sharing in its expense. (1) The function of the State organization is first to secure systematic work in each city and town ; to assist in the general campaign of edu- cational work against the moths; and, by means of trained employees, to make a thorough examination of the infested district and to help train the local organizations to the maxi- mum degree of efficiency. (2) The local organization of each municipality is charged with the enforcement of the law on private estates and with the care of the public trees. (3) The individual, within certain limits of expense, is required to destroy the moths on his property, under certain penalties for neglect. This general plan of work is a most admirable one, but for its success requires the intelligent and hearty co-operation by all parties interested. A brief summary of the essential features of the act may well be given at this point : — 1906.] PUBLIC DOCUMENT — No. 73. 15 The Moths are Public Nuisances. The gypsy and brown-tail moths are declared public nuisances and their suppression is required. The Superintendent of Suppression. A superintendent appointed by the Governor, with power, sub- ject to the Governor’s approval, of appointing agents and assist- ants, has entire general charge of the work of suppressing the moths. Duties of Cities, Towns and Individuals. Cities and towns (under the advice and general direction of the superintendent, and by such agent as they may designate or ap- point) are required, under penalty for neglect, to destroy the eggs, pup and nests of the gypsy and the brown-tail moths within their limits, excepting that such work is not to be done by cities and towns on property controlled by the Commonwealth; nor is it to be done upon private property, excepting where the owners of the same fail to destroy the eggs, pup and nests of the moths, in accordance with the terms of the official notice to private owners, noted in the section here following : — Notice to Private Owners. The mayor of every city and the selectmen of every town shall, at suitable times, notify every owner of land located therein which is infested with the moths, requiring him to destroy the eggs, pupe and nests of the moths within a specified time. When the mayor or selectmen decide that the cost of such de- struction (on lands contiguous and under one ownership) will exceed one-half of one per cent of the assessed valuation of the lands, then they may designate in the notice a part only of such lands on which the destruction shall take place. Failure of Private Owners to destroy Moths. If the owner does not, as required by the terms of the aforesaid notice, destroy the eggs, pupze and nests of the moths, then the city or town, subject to the approval of the State superintendent, shall destroy them, and shall assess upon such aforesaid lands the actual cost of so doing, to an amount, however, not exceeding one-half of one per cent. of the assessed valuation of the land. This amount, so assessed, shall be collected in the form of taxes, and constitutes a lien upon such lands. 16 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. Redress by Abatement and Appeal. The assessors may abate the moth assessment in the case of any private land owner decided by them to be unable to pay it because of age, infirmity or poverty. Appeal to the county superior court, with special provision for prompt hearing, is» provided by the statute for any person ag- grieved by assessment on account of this work; provided a com- plaint is entered within thirty days of notice of such assessment. Appropriation by the Commonwealth. To meet the expenses incurred under its moth-suppression law, the Commonwealth has appropriated $300,000. Of this sum, $75,000 may be expended during 1905, $150,000 (and any un- expended balance) during 1906, and $75,000 (and any unexpended balance) during 1907, up to May 1, 1907, inclusive. For the purpose of experimenting with natural enemies for - destroying the moths $10,000 is additionally appropriated for each of the years 1905, 1906 and 1907. Reimbursements to Cities and Towns. 1. Cities and towns with valuation of real and personal estate of $12,500,000 or more, having spent $5,000 in any one calendar year, shall be reimbursed annually fifty per cent (one-half) of all further expenditure. 2. Cities and towns with valuation less than $12,500,000 and more than $6,000,000, having spent an amount equal to one- twenty-fifth of one per cent of such valuation in one year, shall be reimbursed annually eighty per cent (four-fifths) of all further expenditure. 3. Towns with valuation less than $6,000,000, having spent an amount equal to one-twenty-fifth of one per cent of such valua- tion in one year, shall be reimbursed once in sixty days for all further expenditure. Limits to required Expenditure by Cities and Towns. No city or town with an assessed real and personal valuation of more than $6,000,000 shall be required to expend in the suppres- sion of the moths, during any one full year, more than one-fifteenth of one per cent of such valuation. No town with an assessed real and personal valuation of less than $6,000,000 shall be required to thus expend during any one full year more than one-twenty-fifth of one per cent of such valuation. 1906. ] PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. sly Valuations of 1904 taken as Basis. Wherever valuations of real and personal property are referred to in the gypsy and brown-tail moth suppression law, the valuations of 1904 are meant. Wilful Resistance or Obstruction. Wilful resistance to or obstruction of any agent of the Com- monwealth or of any city or town, while lawfully engaged in the execution of the purposes of the moth-suppression law, is forbid- den under penalty. THE WORK BEGUN. On May 8 the writer was called from New York, where he was located at the time, at the request of His Excellency W. L. Douglas, Governor of Massachusetts, to consider accepting the position of superintendent for suppressing the gypsy and brown-tail moths, and at an interview with His Excellency May 10 the appointment was tendered. This offer was wholly unexpected and unsolicited in any way. The writer at once returned to New York and laid the case fully before the business interests with which he was connected. A release of services having been secured, he returned to Boston, and on May 15 qualified for the office. It was apparent that considerable time and effort must be expended in preliminary work. There was no exact knowl- edge of the bounds of the infested district ; no organization was available for work; the trained employees of the Board of Agriculture had become widely scattered ; the somewhat complex provisions of the law required careful study; an office force had to be organized and a careful system of ac- counting devised, while tentative plans of work were required almost immediately. The only available assets, if such they may be called, were the knowledge of effective methods as developed by the previous State work, the records pre- served by the Board of Agriculture and particularly the availability of a limited number of trained men familiar with the moths. The services of these men have been of the greatest value. 18 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. On May 16 the office of the Superintendent for Suppress- ing the Gypsy and Brown-tail Moths was established in its present location. As rapidly as possible, a nucleus of a force of agents and inspectors was obtained, and frequent conferences were held with the Attorney-General for infor- mation and rulings concerning the law under which the superintendent was to act. During the remainder of the month the work of organizing the office and field force was pushed as rapidly as possible, a system of bookkeeping developed and necessary details attended to. ORGANIZATION OF THE OFFICE. The matter of developing a proper system of accounting received early attention. It was apparent at a glance that, under the somewhat complicated provisions of the law, accounts would necessarily be opened with all the cities and towns of the district, while other arrangements must be made for the accurate recording of the various classes of expendi- tures so that their totals might be determined at any time without delay. A modification of a system of bookkeeping which has been successfully employed by one of our largest corporations was adopted, arrangements made for the nec- essary books, vouchers and records, and letters sent to the known infested cities and towns requesting the name of the person or board who would have charge of executing the pro- visions of the law. The superintendent, being unable to attend unaided to the organizing of the work, as well as to answering the numer- ous inquiries for information and assistance which were continually pouring in, was assisted in the office by the field agent first appointed, Mr. J. A. Farley, late of the United States Biological Survey. Mr. Farley brings to the present work technical knowledge of great value, while his long experience in the former State work against the moths has made his services particularly desirable. During May and June the superintendent held conferences almost nightly with city and town boards, explaining to them the requirements of the law and soliciting their co-operation in suppressing the moth pest. Thousands of gypsy moth caterpillars clustered at base of banded tree. Arlington, June, 1905. 1906. ] PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. Lys PLAN OF WorK. It was apparent that the work must progress along two lines: first, to obtain an accurate knowledge of the extent of the infested area; and second, to organize work against the moth in the cities and towns where the caterpillar plague was already in evidence. Until the bounds of the infested district were known, and a general idea of the severity of the infestation was obtained, no final apportionment of the State appropriation could be made. On the other hand, the need of a large amount of immediate work was obvious, particu- Jarly in the badly infested central cities and towns. To carry on these dual lines of effort the territory was roughly divided into four divisions, each being placed in charge of a field agent who had had large experience in work against the moth as well as in handling men and in dealing with the public. Under these agents were placed a certain number of trained inspectors, whose work at first was principally that of ex- amining cutlying territory, while the agents devoted their efforts toward organizing municipal operations in the central region. When the scouting had been brought to a close, the operations were well under way in a large number of cities and towns, and the inspectors were then detailed to follow up this local work, to co-operate with the local superintend- ents, and, when necessary, to instruct them in the most efficient methods of combating the pests. In selecting employees it has been the policy of the super- intendent to hire only men of experience and proved ability in the work against the moth pests. It has seemed unwise to employ untrained men in the execution of this law so long as the services of experienced men could be obtained. This has resulted in the disappointment of a great many applicants for employment, but the superintendent has felt that only by insisting on the highest grade of efficient service could the insects be brought under control. MappinG THE INFESTED TERRITORY. The problem of first importance was to determine the extent of the infested territory. As is well known, the area occupied by the gypsy moth in 1899 embraced 359 square 20 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. miles. In the time which had elapsed between the cessation of the work of the State Board of Agriculture and the be- ginning of the work under the present superintendent, 8 additional infested municipalities were reported from various sources, namely, Billerica, East Bridgewater, Framingham, Gloucester, North Andover, North Reading, Scituate and Weston. This added to the known infested district an area of 191 square miles, making a total of 550 square miles. It was well known to the superintendent that a large spreading of the moth had occurred from the badly infested sections lying immediately to the north of Boston. The spreading of the caterpillars through the agencies of traffic is a well-established fact. It was impossible to ride through Medford, Malden, Saugus or Arlington during May or June of 1904 and 1905 without becoming covered with gypsy moth caterpillars, and it was evident that a large spreading of the insect had taken place. To determine just how far the moth pest had spread, and to ascertain the size of the problem on hand, a corps of about 10 trained men was organized and sent out into the regions suspected but not known to be infested, to the north, south and west of the moth-area of 1899. These men had had the benefit of sev- eral years’ experience in gypsy moth work for the Board of Agriculture, were thoroughly familiar with the moth and its habits, and were known to the superintendent to be reliable and trustworthy. After the territory was divided among these inspectors, they were instructed to make a diligent search for the moths, and after finding them in any city or town to spend several days in scouting to de- velop the local situation, and then push on to the next town. The result of this examination of the outlying territory was most astonishing. Town after town in all directions was found infested, and not until fall was the outer edge of the infestation reached. This border line comprises Salis- bury, Amesbury, Merrimac, Haverhill, Methuen, Andover, Tewksbury, Chelmsford, Carlisle, Acton, Stow, Hudson, Marlborough, Southborough, Hopkinton, Ashland, Sher- born, Dover, Westwood, Norwood, Canton, Stoughton, 1906.] PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. 21 Brockton, West Bridgewater, Bridgewater, Middleborough, Lakeville, Wareham and Plymouth. Outside this line a complete belt of towns has been scouted without finding the gypsy moth. Briefly, the whole of Essex County, over one-half of Middlesex County, half of Norfolk County and practically the entire county of Plym- outh were found to be infested. As against 359 square miles of territory infested in 1900, we now have a total of 2,224 square miles occupied by the gypsy moth in varying numbers. In other words, the territory to-day is nearly six times as great as when the work of the State Board of Agriculture was abandoned. (See map.) Presented in tabular form, the infested district by periods is given below : — Dane N pa no cies Area in Square BOW reais edi fedlY EIB TOIT les 34 359 1905, ; : : : : : : : 124 2,224 The present infested district embraces nearly one-fourth of the entire area of the State. While, as previously stated, a row of towns along the outer border has been scouted without finding evidence of the moth, it should not be in- ferred that the insect does not occur in these towns or even ° in places farther from the known infested district. It should be remembered that a scouting of a week’s duration in the caterpillar season may not disclose the presence of the moth when it is in small numbers, but that it may be readily detected later after its buff egg clusters have been laid and are revealed by the falling of the leaves. The fact that a snmmer scouting reveals no moths is at best but negative evidence. The infestations found varied greatly in extent, growing less as the distance from the central infested district in- creased. The section south of Boston, uninfested in 1900 and now completely infested, well illustrates this point. . 22 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. Quincy and Braintree were found to be generally infested ; and in Weymouth, Hingham, Cohasset and Hull a consider- able number of moths were found. South of this section the infestations diminished in size, until at Lakeville, Middle- borough and Wareham only a few specimens of the insect were discovered. The presence of the moth, even in small numbers, in these outlying districts is of grave significance, since only a few years are necessary for the insect to become thoroughly established where remedial and preventive meas- ures are not diligently employed. That the automobile has been an important factor in the distribution of the gypsy moth within the past three years does not admit of dispute. It was impossible to ride through the infested sections immediately to the north of Boston without becoming thoroughly coated with caterpillars dur- ing the spring months of 1903, 1904 and 1905. During the current year, in the caterpillar season, the superintendent had occasion to keep a rough record of the number of gypsy moth caterpillars found on himself and vehicle after trips through the infested district, and this varied from 3 to 129. Automobiles, with the wide surface on which the caterpillars may rest, will, of course, intercept more of these as they spin down than a carriage or other vehicle. Where pleasure driving or teaming is limited in a day’s trip to from 10 to 20 miles, the automobile in the same time passes over from 40 to 100 miles. Itis of great significance that the places where automobilists are accustomed to stop for meals or supplies are most generally infested by the gypsy moth. Favorite trips with the automobile are to Gloucester, Newburyport and Plymouth. All these places are now known to be in- fested by the gypsy moth, in fact, the insects occur there in much greater numbers than even in the intervening terri- tory. The means of distribution will be more fully treated in another place. mre Z4 LR VS Gn YUP MEG RNY \ SF as S 4 L 2] ‘| a Ne S ONG EE UE GEG LENG en 4 ae Op ty yyy eek Key C7 Vi) N INFESTED DISTRICT 1900 | ese XS i is Yu RR ; ohn Yj INFESTED DISTRICT 1905 lias a he if 2 . MIN ~ S N w Name “acl 4 NS BA Gypsy moth infested district in Massachusetts: 1900, 359 square miles; 1905, 2,224 square miles. 1906.] PUBLIC DOCUMENT— No. 73. List of Towns and Cities infested by the Gypsy Moth, Abington. Acton. Amesbury. Andover. Arlington. Ashland. Avon. Barnstable. Bedford. Belmont. Beverly. Billerica. Boston. Bourne. Boxford. Braintree. Bridgewater. Brockton. Brookline. Burlington. Cambridge. Canton. Carlisle. Carver. Chelmsford. Chelsea. Cohasset. Concord. Danvers. Dedham. Dover. Duxbury. East Bridgewater. Essex. Everett. Framingham. Georgetown. Gloucester. Groveland. Halifax. Hamilton. Hanover. Jan. 1, 1906. Hanson. Haverhill. Hingham. Holbrook. Hopkinton. Hudson. Hull. Hyde Park. Ipswich. Kingston. Lakeville. Lawrence. Lexington. Lincoln. Lynn. Lynnfield. Malden. Manchester. Marblehead. Marlborough. Marshfield. Maynard. Medford. Melrose. Merrimac. Methuen. Middleborough. Middleton. Milton. Nahant. Natick. Needham. Newbury. Newburyport. Newton. North Andover. North Reading. Norwell. Norwood. Peabody. Pembroke. Plymouth. Plympton. Quincy. Randolph. Reading. Revere. Rockland. Rockport. Rowley. Salem. Salisbury. Saugus. Scituate. Sherborn. Somerville. Southborough. Stoneham. Stoughton. Stow. Sudbury. Swampscott. Tewksbury. Topsfield. Wakefield. Waltham. Wareham. Watertown. Wayland. Wellesley. Wenham. West Bridgewater. West Newbury. Weston. Westwood. Weymouth. Whitman. Wilmington. Winchester. Winthrop. Woburn. Yarmouth. 23 24 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. Moru CoLoNnigEs OUTSIDE OF MASSACHUSETTS. The development of serious infestations of the moths in neighboring States is at present of importance to the work in this Commonwealth only so far as the danger of the rein- festation of our cleared towns is concerned. That such colonies do exist outside the State practically confines the policy of work in Massachusetts to suppression only, with- out attempt to reach absolute extermination. In fact, the time when either pest could have been exterminated has long since passed. The superintendent has kept in touch with the developments in the neighboring States through correspondence with experts interested in the matter, and is thus enabled to present a brief summary of the conditions there existing. Gypsy Moth. At Providence, R.I., there now exists a considerable, widely diffused gypsy moth colony in the residential section. Egg clusters are common in street trees in many parts of the city, and as a result there has been and will continue to be a continuous scattering of caterpillars by means of vehicles —a_ scattering which will increase yearly unless vigorous action is taken against the pest. The apathy of the authorities who should deal with the matter is regrettable. If the moth is neglected, the trees of Providence will soon suffer severely, while it is quite possible that from this large colony a part of the southern border of Massachusetts now free from the pest will be exposed to infestation. After the central office inspectors had located the gypsy moth along the New Hampshire border, from Methuen to Salisbury, the superintendent communicated with State Entomologist E. D. Sanderson at Durham, N. H., and suggested that the insect probably occurred in that State, and that it would be most desirable to have an examination made there by a trained man. At Professor Sanderson’s request Inspector John Sweeney was temporarily released from our service, and in a few weeks’ time located the moth along the coast line from Seabrook to Portsmouth —a notable avenue of travel. So far no gypsy moths have been found in Maine. ‘OnUT}JUOD T[IM soToIyoA Aq Burs9414e0s pus ‘sie[[idiey8o You AsdAS wioay ooay ydoy oq JouUBD s00z} 400.148 ‘pouring puB 4jno useq sBy Ysnaq oy} [Ug ‘GOBT ‘toquiejdeg “‘ssvyT ‘U0JSUIXOT ‘opIspvod poysosul A[peq [BeoIdAy, 1906. ] PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. 25 Brown-tail Moth. A single finding of this insect has been reported from Providence. Prof. W. E. Britton of the Connecticut Experi- ment Station, New Haven, states that to his knowledge no findings have been made in his State. The two lower tiers of counties in New Hampshire are generally infested with the brown-tail moth, and Professor Sanderson has had specimens sent him from the White Mountain region. Notable flights of the moths have been observed at Nashua, Concord and Portsmouth. In Maine Prof. E. D. Hitchings, State Entomologist, Waterville, has found the pest scattered along the coast in various places. Portland, Rockland and Augusta are gen- erally infested, while sufficient numbers of the moths have been found at Bar Harbor to warrant local work against the insect. The moth has also been reported at Eastport and at ot. John; N. B. In eight years’ time this strong-flying insect has become disseminated along the entire eastern seacoast of New Eng- land and westward to central Massachusetts and southern New Hampshire. Even Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket have not escaped its visitation. ORGANIZATION OF Town Work. The moth pest had made itself felt so severely in recent years in the central municipalities that some of them already had local organizations for combating it, or at least had made an attempt to destroy the nests of the gypsy and brown-tail moths on street and park trees. In other towns and cities, village improvement societies, women’s clubs and similar bodies had accomplished a great amount of good, particularly in arousing property owners to the importance and necessity of destroying the moths, but, in spite of all this good work, there were throughout the district most numerous and discouraging examples of neglected estates where the pests swarmed in full force. The provision of the necessary funds for prosecuting the work was early urged on the worst afflicted municipalities. It was found that in many cases the municipal budget had 26 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. already been made up, and that, despite the caterpillar nuisance, it was difficult to secure appropriations in season for effective work. In the case of many towns a special town meeting was necessary, and all these delays militated strongly against the success of the season’s efforts. An additional reason for delaying local appropriations was found in the fact that many municipalities had already made large expenditures before the passage of the act for which no reimbursement could be obtained. Thus the city of Salem spent nearly $8,000 during the winter and spring preceding the enactment of the law, while Medford, Somer- ville, Cambridge and many other communities had already made liberal expenditures. While the request for addi- tional large appropriations may have appeared as a hardship to some communities, it should be borne in mind that the expenditures previously made had resulted in reducing the amount of work necessary during the season of 1905. In some cases there was evident a marked tendency to delay making appropriations and in a few a strong attempt to bring the work within the sphere of local politics, a state of affairs which seems as remarkable as it is unfortunate. The problem of combating the two moths calls for the best thought and the heartiest co-operation of every one inter- ested in preserving our trees from harm, and it is evident that it ought to be treated as a business proposition, pure and simple, without reference to political considerations of any kind. The cost of the work will be great, even with a maximum of efficiency and the utmost economy. While the regrettable conditions mentioned have obtained in the case of a few municipalities, the response from the cities and towns as a whole has been most hearty and encouraging. They have taken a broad view of the situation, have provided the necessary funds, have placed competent men in charge of the work and have endeavored to prosecute it vigorously and effectively. In many places citizens having large business interests have gladly taken up the burden of directing the work, and have given freely of their time and often of their personal funds in the effort to suppress the moths. Where public service can command the well-trained energies of 1906.] PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. 2% such citizens, efficient work and encouraging results must follow. In other places men familiar with the moths have been placed in direct charge of field operations, and have rendered most faithful service. It has been most helpful and gratifying to the superintendent to have, almost without ex- ception, the hearty co-operation of this corps of local super- intendents, and to them in large measure is due the credit for the results so far obtained. There has been good ‘‘ team work” all along the line, and if this condition can continue and the necessary funds are available, success in the end will be attained. With the assurance of systematic work throughout the district, and that no town’s efforts should suffer from the neglect of the adjoining municipalities, the appropriations were as a whole freely made and the work inaugurated. At the present writing 95 cities and towns out of the total of 124 infested with the gypsy moth have a more or less com- plete organization for combating the moths, and upward of 1,500 men are so employed. In the remaining towns, only scattering nests of the gypsy moth were found by the inspect- ors, and but little work, relatively speaking, will be required. As soon as fall work was well under way, the demands on the superintendent’s time, both in field and office, became greatly increased. Town and city officials in large numbers sought the office for advice, while special problems in field work needing attention constantly presented themselves. To assist in attending to these matters promptly, with the approval of the Governor, Agent Dexter M. Rogers of the eastern division was transferred to the office as assistant superintendent, where his experience and knowledge of the work have been most helpful. It is always a pleasant duty to acknowledge help received from others. The superintendent has sought freely the advice of the Attorney-General, the Auditor of the Com- monwealth and the secretary of the Board of Agriculture, and in every case their counsel and assistance have been as freely given. The suggestions of the officials and several members of the Massachusetts Association for the Suppres- sion of the Gypsy and Brown-tail Moths have been par- 28 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. (Jan. ticularly helpful. Finally, the superintendent is glad to acknowledge his obligation to field agents F. A. Bates, J. W. Enwright, C. W. Minott and L. H. Worthley, in charge of the four divisions, men who have brought to this work a thorough training and well-ripened judgment, and who have been at all times closely in touch with the field opera- tions. The superintendent’s thanks are also due to the local superintendents of the various cities and towns, and to the inspectors employed by the central office, for hearty co-operation and faithful service. Poxuicy OF Work AGAINST EAcH Species OF MorTH. As soon as the size of the gypsy moth infested area was determined, it became necessary to decide on the course to follow with reference to each species of moth. The gypsy moth had been found from the New Hampshire line to Buz- _ zard’s Bay and westward to Marlborough. Outside the State it was known to exist at Providence, R. I., and to be scattered along the New Hampshire seacoast to Portsmouth. The brown-tail moth had been reported at Amherst, and was known to occur at Fitchburg and Worcester. It extended south to Cape Cod and north throughout southern New Hamp- shire and along the Maine coast to Eastport, thus having a much wider distribution than the gypsy moth. Since the funds available were wholly insuflicient to cope with both pests, it was decided to adopt the policy of suppressing the gypsy moth so far as possible wherever it occurred, and to confine work against the brown-tail moth to clearing street trees and trees around or near residences. The following reasons governed the decision : — i. The gypsy moth spreads slowly, almost entirely by the agencies of traffic. The female moth does not fly. The brown-tail moth is a strong flyer and is borne by the wind for many miles. 2. The gypsy moth is a serious pest of all trees, both deciduous and coniferous, and attacks all shrubs and some- times even crops. The brown-tail moth attacks deciduous trees, and is mainly a pest of fruit trees and oaks. ‘(peonped YON) SUIs19MIO Ssoxos YIOq Jo syjou YIM ‘soavo,T ATOYOIW UL suOooD0D ‘PF “SIBTTIGIOIVHO =°*E ‘SOSSBUUL SSM 'Z ‘(pesrejue ATJYUSITS) s83o SutAvl syjOoU eTBUIO,, “T "UJOUL [I[BJ-UMOIG JO sosejs snowey, 1906. | PUBLIC DOCUMENT — No. 73. 29 3. The gypsy moth is often hard to find, even when abun- dant, and its treatment calls for a high degree of skill as well as a liberal outlay of money. The brown-tail moth is easily found in winter when its webs are prominent at the tips of twigs. Its destruction is relatively inexpensive and calls for no particular skill. 4. But few gypsy moths are likely to reach Massachusetts from the small colonies outside the State. A strong northerly wind during the flying season would blow into Massachusetts multitudes of brown-tail moths from the now badly infested New Hampshire border and from southwestern Maine. The facts being as above stated, it seemed to the superin- tendent unwise to authorize large expenditures of money in combating the brown-tail moth in woodlands, while in the case of the slow-spreading and more dangerous gypsy moth it was obvious that every possible effort should be made to stamp it out wherever it occurred. It was therefore decided to urge upon the local superintendents of work the necessity of destroying the brown-tail moth on street trees, and of insisting that every property owner destroy the pest on his house lot and in his orchard, should he have one. In this way the street trees are protected from injury by the cater- pillars, and the danger from caterpillar poisoning, at least from this source, is done away with for next season. This, it seemed, was all that could be done against the brown-tail moth. With the gypsy moth it was decided to follow practically the same lines with regard to shade trees and private estates, and, in addition, to make a special effort to protect all road- side trees, whether in the centres of population or in the outlying country. The matter of prime importance in con- nection with the gypsy moth is to prevent its farther spread as the result of the dropping of caterpillars on vehicles. So long as the street trees in our badly infested cities and towns remain infested by the insect, just so long will the cater- pillars spin down in May and June and be carried long distances by the agencies of traflic over the road. It is imperative, therefore, that street trees and roadsides most 30 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. frequented for travel shall be kept free from the moth pest, and this has been the first effort of the present administra- tion. In the central infested cities and towns a strong effort has been made to clear the street trees of the gypsy moth egg clusters, and in outlying districts wherever infestations occurred by roadsides the brush has been cut and burned and the trees remaining thoroughly treated. So long as roadside brush remains infested by the gypsy moth, just so long will it be practically impossible to keep the street trees free from these insects. The superintendent regrets that in carrying out this work it will be necessary to sacrifice for a time a considerable amount of roadside shrubbery, yet if this shrubbery is left in its present infested condition it will be killed in a few years by the moths. By cutting and burn- ing it now, the shade trees will be protected, their continued infestation prevented and the moth pest destroyed. After these roadsides become free from the moth, nature in a few years will restore them to their former condition. Many cases have arisen where badly infested woodland adjoins roadsides, and in the spring months yields large swarms of caterpillars to be carried away by every passing vehicle. In such cases an effort’ has been made to thin out such woodland and treat the moth nests along the road borders so as to establish a zone of safety from 50 to 100 feet wide, and thus do away with farther scattering of the insect. In the town of Saugus, for example, several wood- land colonies abut on the public highways. From trees which overhang the road the caterpillars drop on passing vehicles. It is practically impossible to keep the central residential districts of Saugus free from the moth while these colonies exist, to say nothing of the adjoining towns of Wakefield, Lynnfield, Lynn, Revere, Malden and Mel- rose. In the case of these woodland colonies we have deemed it advisable to establish protective belts as above mentioned without reference to the action of the owners of the infested estates, who later on will be called upon to carry out the provisions of the act on the remaining untreated property. The act under which work against the moth pests is be- 1906. | PUBLIC DOCUMENT —WNo. 73. dl ing conducted requires the superintendent to ‘‘ separate, so far as is practicable, the expenditures on work against the gypsy moth and those on work against the brown-tail moth in each city and town.” Since the law does not give the superintendent control over the form in which reports from cities and towns shall be rendered, it has been impossible to make such division of expenditures. Repeated letters have been sent to city and town treasurers and to the local super- intendents in charge of the work, but it has been practically impossible to obtain the information desired. FINANCIAL STATEMENT. The law requires the superintendent to present his annual report ‘‘on or before the third Wednesday in January of each year.” It has been impossible to obtain from several cities and towns the complete record of their expenses under the act. The following report includes the records of the expenditures for work performed previous to Jan. 1, 1906. The balance of the appropriation is apparent rather than real, and will be practically expended during the month of January in additional reimbursements to those towns whose records as yet are incomplete. Appropriation May 8, 1905, . : 5 : : . . $75,000 00 Office expenses : — Management, . ; : ; ; : , $3,125 00 Salaries of clerks, . : : : : ‘ 1,292 00 Yo Rent,; .. . : A : ; : 516 67 = Stationery and aanieee, : : : : 913 34 /~ Printing, . : : . : : 951 91 | Supplies, -aranca, ete , ‘ : ; : 545 30 Ls i! Exponuamviees roy growing ea 8 167 85 \& SamGUiCO MECC ge ei iy a 775 86 \<¢ Field expenses : — Nd y, % Wages of employees, : : 9,130 24 Bip ae Travelling expenses upermecndent and employees), . : ; : 5 : 2,544 44 Supplies, : : : 3 149 46 Reimbursement to hities and ee : F 40,250 08 Sundries, : ‘ ‘ : ' 5 5 113 50 ————__ 60,475 65 Balance Jan, 1,1906, . ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ : . $14,524 35 32 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. Parasite Appropriation. The various expenses incurred in the work of importing and studying parasites of the gypsy and brown-tail moths are given below : — Appropriation May 8, 1905, . : : . - : - $10,000 00 Services of experts and collectors, : : $852 88 Wages of employees, . i . E 5 745 39 Travelling expenses, . : : . + 116 08 Rent, .25 y ; ; : ; : : 85 00 Supplies, : : : : : : : 122 25 Stationery and postage, : : : 3 13 04 Sundries, : ; j : : : ; 170 45 Ee 2,105 09 Balance Jan. 1, 1906, .. : : . : : ~ . $f, 89291 The total amount spent in the 22 cities and towns receiv- ing reimbursement to the amount of $40,250.08 may be distributed as follows : — Total amount spent, : 5 : : $76,811 76 Pay-rolls, : ; : : : : : $65,944 08 Travelling expenses, . : : . : 490 55 Supplies, : 3 : . . : ‘ 8,655 87 Sundries, : ‘ : : k : : 1,020 42 Stationery and postage, : 3 : : 483 37 Printing, 4 : : : 5 : : 185 47 Rent, : ; 5 F ; ; ; i 32 00 ——— $76,811 76 As in the case of the central office, many expenses have been incurred this year by cities and towns which will not be duplicated in succeeding years. The items of ‘‘sup- plies” and ‘* sundries” represent chiefly the investment in the necessary apparatus for conducting the work. Ladders, pruners, axes, spraying outfits, etc., have been required, and these supplies, even after a proper allowance for deprecia- tion, will be available for use for several years to come. CONDITION OF THE INFESTED DISTRICT. In describing the infested district, a natural division in- cludes the central and the outer towns and cities. By the ‘* central towns” are meant those comprising the centre of Roadside at Belmont, cleared of badly infested brush, and in condition for economical treatment, 1906. ] PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. 33 infestation, and naturally the ones most thoroughly infested by the gypsy and brown-tail moths. The term ‘outer towns” includes those lying outside of this central badly infested district. The degree of infestation varies in these latter towns from those which are generally infested lying on the border of the central district to the outer towns, such as Carlisle, South- borough, Hopkinton, Stoughton, etc., where only a few gypsy moth nests have been found. In each case the report is based upon an examination by an inspector from this office, supplemented by data furnished by the local superintendent. The annual initial expenditure required to insure reim- bursement by the State, both in 1905 and 1906, is given in the case of each municipality. Central Towns. ARLINGTON. WALTER R. CASWELL, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ ‘ . $1,978 25 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : : . 3,956 49 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . : 5 UO sb 7 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ; ; : ; ~ This town is now as seriously infested as any in the dis- trict. The gypsy and brown-tail moths can be found through practically the entire area, while the woodland colonies are of notable size and importance. | 83929225 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ; : F . 8,055 48 Saugus is generally and severely infested by both gypsy and brown-tail moths. Practically all the woodland is in- fested by the gypsy moth in dangerous numbers, and during 1906. ] PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. 53 the caterpillar season of 1905 a great deal of stripping took place. The town has shown a most helpful and commendable interest in suppressing the gypsy moth. Town work was begun promptly in May, upon the passage of the present act, and has been prosecuted with vigor and with most satis- factory results. The work has been under the supervision of a thoroughly trained man and the results have been most gratifying. During the caterpillar season a large part of the street trees were burlapped and sprayed; and as soon as the eggs were laid, a gang of men was put at .work destroying them. At this writing the street trees through- out the town have been cleared of the gypsy moth egg clusters, and nearly all the necessary work against the brown-tail moth has been performed. The infested road- sides have been thinned out over approximately one-half the town. Certain owners of valuable woodland who have shown a disposition to make a liberal expenditure for sup- pressing the moths have received the assistance of the town force. About 200 acres of badly infested woodland have been thinned out and put in condition for next season’s work. Saugus presents one of the most serious problems in the entire district. A great deal of burlapping and spraying and other necessary work must be done next season if the increase of the moths is to be checked. SOMERVILLE. CHARLES I. Bucknam, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, i , . $2,500 00 1906, amount required before reimbursement, ; ‘ . 5,000 00 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, . 1,100 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ; ; : : ~ The city of Somerville is entitled to highest praise for the very thorough and efficient work performed against the brown-tail and gypsy moths since the cessation of exter- minative work by the State in 1900. This work has been in the hands of the inspector of trees, a man thoroughly competent to judge of the needs of the situation, who for- tunately has been liberally supported by appropriations 54 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. from the city government. As a result, the infestations in this city by either brown-tail or gypsy moth are limited in number, and principally confined to certain areas of land which have been held for building purposes and which have received no attention from the owners. The gypsy moth is scattered to-day in small numbers throughout the city, the principal infestations being in the western section. The brown-tail moth is generally prevalent, but in small num- bers. The occurrence of this insect (and frequently also of the gypsy moth) in Somerville without doubt arises from the numerous neglected estates in neighboring cities. At the present writing the work of clearing both moths from the street trees is nearly completed. A considerable amount of burlapping will be required next season in the sections where the gypsy moth still exists. STONEHAM. GEORGE M. JeErts, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ; : z $980 84 1906, amount required before reimbursement, F F » 1,961 68 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . : . 98,193 99 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ; ‘ ; ; 640 45 Stoneham, with its large woodland areas, is thoroughly infested by both species of moths. The gypsy moth is abundant in dangerous numbers in the woodland in the southern part of the town, and roadsides and orchards are generally infested. The work against the moths in this town is entitled to high commendation. It was placed last summer in the hands of a competent trained man, and has been liberally supported by appropriation of town funds. At the present writing the infested roadsides in all parts of the town have been cut over and burned and the street trees and those on public grounds have been cleared of gypsy moth egg clusters. Work against the brown-tail moth is now in progress and should be completed by February 1. Perhaps because this town has been so severely afllicted by both moths, the property owners are showing a most commendable interest in destroying decayed or worthless trees and brush, and in 1906. ] PUBLIC DOCUMENT — No. 73. 55 clearing the moths from the remaining trees on their estates. Next season the trees throughout the town should be bur- lapped, and a considerable amount of spraying also will be necessary. SwaMPscort. GrorGE NEWHALL, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ; ‘ . $1,539 06 1906, amount required before reimbursement, - : 5 lO) UW 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . F 7) 2624 14 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ; : : ; = Swampscott is badly infested by both species of moths. The gypsy moth colonies in the westerly part of the town are of large size. In the woodland in the easterly part there are numerous scattering gypsy moth egg clusters; but in the Cedar Hill section, where a large moth colony was treated a number of years ago by the employees of the State Board of Agriculture, only a few moths have been found. Work against the caterpillars was begun by the local superintendent June 17, and a gang of men has been em- ployed against the gypsy moth practically all the time since that date. The infested roadsides have been cut out and the remaining trees put in condition for burlapping next season. Nearly all the large infested pasture area has been cut out and should be burned early in the caterpillar season of next year. Practically all the work against both moths on street trees has been completed at this writing. Aside from burn- ing over the infested pastures a great deal of burlapping and spraying will be necessary next season to bring the gypsy moth under control. WAKEFIELD. W. W. WHITTREDGE, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ; 5 . $1,669 12 1906, amount required before reimbursement, P ‘ . 98,3838 24 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . : . 98,881 74 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . i ; : le ciOmel) Wakefield is now generally infested over its entire area by both moths. The gypsy moth is most abundant in the southern and eastern parts of the town and it occurs in scat- tering numbers in the northern woodlands. 56 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. The local officials early made suitable provision for the town work, and the necessary operations were carried on during the summer and fall in a generally satisfactory man- ner. ‘The street trees in the central district were burlapped and attended during the summer months, and a certain amount of fall spraying against the brown-tail moth gave good results. A part of the infested roadsides has been cut out and burned, but more of this work remains to be done. The town park at Hart’s Hill has been cleared of dead and worthless trees, the brush cut and burned and the moth nests destroyed on the remaining trees. This particular work has been performed in a very thorough and satisfactory manner. At the present time the local force is at work on street trees destroying the nests of both moths, and will probably be able to take up work on private estates by February 1. The work next season will include a general campaign of burlapping and spraying, and roadsides in certain sections and in a part of the park reservation must be burned over with oil. WALTHAM. RicHARD A. JonxEs, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, : : - $2,500 00 1906, amount required before reimbursement, ; ; . §,000 00 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . j oe OTA 64 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . : : ¢ ‘ - Waltham was practically clear of the gypsy moth at the close of the former State work; but a hasty inspection dur- ing the caterpillar season of 1905 revealed the presence of the insect over the entire area, although none of the colonies outside the woodland district were of notable size. In the woods lying near Lexington Street in the northern part of the city there is a large colony covering approximately 10 acres, over half of which was severely injured last summer by the caterpillars. The brown-tail moth is generally scat- tered throughout the city. In past years considerable work was done by the city authorities against this insect, both on street trees and on private estates. During the past season the local work 1906. | PUBLIC DOCUMENT — No. 73. 57 against both species of moths was prosecuted with vigor and in a very satisfactory manner. In this city we have had the hearty co-operation of the mayor and city govern- ment, which has greatly favored the accomplishment of the necessary work. The street trees have been cleared of the gypsy moth egg clusters, and the work against the brown- tail moth is practically completed at this writing. The woodland colonies will have attention during the winter months, and an earnest effort will be made to put the whole city in condition for efficient work before the hatching period of the eggs next spring. The trees in the infested sections should be burlapped next season, and a limited amount of spraying will probably be necessary. WATERTOWN. Francis H. Barnes, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ : . $2,431 91 1906, amount required before reimbursement, ; F . 4,863 82 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . ; . 4,099 24 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . : ‘ ‘ 5 UBB kd Watertown is now generally infested by both species of moths, but is fortunate in the fact that it has so little wood- land. The street trees and private estates are generally in- fested by both moths, the gypsy being particularly abundant in the eastern section of the town. During the fall months the infested roadsides were cleared of brush and undesirable trees, and at this writing about three-fourths of the street trees have been cleaned of the moths. The local authorities have shown a disposition to provide suitable funds for the work, which has proceeded in a satis- factory manner. The most serious problem in the town is the large number of badly infested private estates, and the notable apathy of many citizens with reference to destroying the moths on their property. The trees throughout the en- tire town should be burlapped and sprayed next season. If thorough work can be continued here, the moths should be brought under control before the close of the caterpillar season of 1906. 58 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. ([Jan. WINCHESTER. Irvine T. Guiup, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, : : . $2,058 73 1906, amount required before reimbursement, s ; alt (eAao 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . 2 - 0,009) 16 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ; : : : - In the residential part of Winchester a great deal of thorough work has been done in past years under the direc- tion of the tree warden. While very satisfactory in view of the local conditions, this work has been seriously interfered with and often set at naught by the influx of gypsy moths from the surrounding woodland colonies. There have also been numerous cases of conspicuous neglect, even on the part of well-to-do private citizens, who have failed to clear their property of the moth pests. The woodland areas of the town are infested by the gypsy moth in dangerous num- bers, while the brown-tail moth occurs in large numbers practically over the entire town. The section which adjoins Woburn is particularly infested with this insect. The town began work promptly under the present act, and has prosecuted its campaign against the moths with a great deal of vigor. The work of the local superintendent is en- titled to highest praise and has been well supported by the town authorities. A large expenditure of money must be made in this town, however, before the moths can be brought under control. A liberal amount of burlapping, banding and spraying will be necessary next season. Atthe present writing the necessary work on public trees has been practi- cally completed, and a considerable amount of work has been done by private citizens in the badly infested woodlands. In co-operation with the city of Medford, the local force is now engaged in thinning out the badly infested section known as the Russell Woods, lying on the southern border of the town. WINTHROP. FRANK W. Tucker, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . j . $1,784 37 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : : : 0,009 74 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, . 525 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . - ; ; 3 - 1906.] PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. 59 This town is now generally infested by both species of moths, although no particularly dangerous colonies exist. The town officials have provided suitable funds for the work, which has been carried out under the direction of an active and efficient committee. At this writing the trees on streets and in public parks have been cleared of both species of the moths, and the work on private estates has begun. Although Winthrop is small in area, it has about 1,000 street trees and nearly twenty-five miles of streets. The most important infestations by each moth are in certain small fruit orchards. The work in the town has been done in a satisfactory manner, has been properly supported by the public, and if these conditions prevail through 1906, the results should be most satisfactory. Burlapping and a limited amount of spraying will be required next year. ‘WOBURN. PretTER E. McHveu, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ i . $2,167 67 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : ; . 4,335 34 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . : . ¢,028 87 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . : F : ‘ - No city or town in the infested district is more in need of thorough and efficient work against the gypsy and brown- tail moths than is Woburn. Both insects occur generally throughout the city. The central residential district, the eastern section adjacent to Stoneham and Winchester and the woodlands in the southern and western parts are all badly infested by the gypsy moth. Large woodland colonies of the gypsy moth have now developed to alarming propor- tions. During the caterpillar season a limited amount of spraying was done in the city, and with the approach of the time for fall work liberal financial provision was made by the city government. Unfortunately the business interests of the local superintendent prevented him from giving to the neces- sary operations proper supervision. There has been in evi- dence at all times in Woburn a most discouraging tendency to make the work a question rather of employing labor than of attempting to control the moths. Late in December, just 60 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. before the close of the fiscal year, a force of nearly 250 men was put at work. The few trained foremen available were simply unable to handle this large gang of men, and, although repeated complaints were made by the State agents to the officials in charge, practically no improvement in the condi- tion was obtainable. It is safe to say that a gang of 25 men, properly directed and working throughout the season, would have accomplished much more in suppressing the moths than the poorly directed forces employed in 1905. We have assurances that during the coming year the moth work in Woburn will be treated as a business proposition and carried out on business-like lines. If this is done, much relief from the pests should be obtained. If not so done the money expended will be practically squandered, and the condition of the city at the close of the year will be even worse than at present. Nearly all the infested roadsides in the city have been cut out and about one-half of the street trees have been cleared of both moths, although a considerable amount of reinspect- ing will be necessary. The work of next season should in- clude a vigorous campaign of spraying, burlapping and an effort to control, if funds permit, the increase of the moth in woodland colonies. Outer Towns. ABINGTON. C. Frep SHaw, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . ; - $508 08 1906, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ ; ee LOLGeI6 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, . 46 75 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ‘ é ; i - An examination of this town by inspectors from this office revealed the gypsy moth in 12 localities. The brown-tail moth is generally scattered throughout the town. ‘The street trees have been cleared of both species of the moths, but as yet little work has been done on private estates. Burlap- ping will be necessary in the sections infested with the gypsy moth during the caterpillar season of 1906. 1906. | PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. 61 ACTON. CHARLES J. WiLuiams, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . ; : . $339 59 1906, amount required before reimbursement, . 3 Sh ara 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, . 150 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, : ‘ : ; - A hasty inspection of the roadsides, street trees and or- chards in this town revealed the presence of 4 small gypsy moth colonies, and the brown-tail moth was found gen- erally distributed throughout the entire area. The local authorities have endeavored to co-operate fully with us in suppressing the insects, and the work has been carried on in a most satisfactory manner. At the present writing nearly all the street trees of the town have been cleared of both moths. The infestations here of the gypsy moth do not offer any serious difficulties if the present thorough work can be continued. Next season the trees in the sections where the colonies were found should be burlapped and carefully attended. AMESBURY. A. L. StTovER, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ : . $1,059 49 1906, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ : 5 ills) 7s 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . : 5 667 20 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . : ; : ; - The gypsy moth is scattered throughout this town, but none of the colonies are of large size. The principal in- festations are in the central residential district, although a few colonies have been found in the northern part of the town near the New Hampshire line. The brown-tail moth is remarkably abundant and last summer caused considerable damage to trees. The work against the moths has been prosecuted vigorously and to our complete satisfaction. The street trees have been cleared of both species of moths. These trees in the sections infested with the gypsy moth should be burlapped next season and carefully attended. 62 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. ([Jan. ANDOVER. J. H. Puaypon, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, : ; ap le22G2 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : F . 2,443 24 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, . 1,010 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . . : ; F - About 50 estates infested by the gypsy moth have been located in Andover by our inspectors. The principal in- festations are in the centre of the town and around the academy and seminary buildings. Small colonies have been found scattered in the southern, eastern and western por- tions of the town, and a general infestation by the brown- tail moth is in evidence. Much good work has been done here in the past by the tree warden, who has been properly supported in his efforts by an excellent public spirit on the part of citizens and town officials. At the present time about two-thirds of the street trees of the town have been cleared of the moths. A great deal of traffic passes through Andover, and the danger both of bringing in additional moths and of carrying others away from the infested localities is a serious feature of the situation. The street trees should be burlapped next season, and a considerable amount of spray- ing will be necessary. ASHLAND. F. A. Morse, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ : . $203 33 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : - 406 65 1905, amount expended in work against moths, leetreatet 4 25 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, ; F ; ; . - In Ashland the roadsides and orchards have been examined and 4 small gypsy moth colonies located. The brown-tail moth appears to be very scarce in the town. The town work has been organized and everything necessary to sup- press the moths has been accomplished. Burlapping will be necessary next year in the sections infested with the gypsy moth, and a thorough watch should be kept for the develop- ment of any additional colonies. oe Panett” pct eee ao eet b i ee d by gypsy moth dead in 1905. ippe , Malden, str caterpillars in 1904 Lebanon Street ines, P . ’ 1906. PUBLIC DOCUMENT — No. 73. 63 ] AVON. V. iL. Snzetx, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . : : . $181 48 1906, amount required before reimbursement, . ; ‘ . 862 96 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, : 15 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ; : : : - Two small colonies of the gypsy moth have been found in this town and have been treated by Inspector Joseph Silva. The local superintendent has cleared the street trees of the brown-tail moth, and also has nearly completed the exami- nation and treatment of private estates. BARNSTABLE. EBEN SmitH, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, : ‘ : $969 31 1906, amount required before reimbursement, é ; : 1,938 62 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . : é - 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . F : ; ; = There are numerous brown-tail moth webs in evidence in this town, and these should be removed before spring. A 9 Co) preliminary inspection made late in December revealed the presence of 1 gypsy moth egg cluster in a tree near one of the largest hotels, a place much frequented by automobiles. D >) The local work has been organized and will be under wa Cop) early in January. BEDFORD. CHARLES W. JENKS, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . : : . $242 04 1906, amount required before reimbursement, . ; F . 484 08 1905, amount expended in work against moths, - : ee tole, 1905, amount of State reimbursement, ‘ : ‘ é : - Over 60 places infested by the gypsy moth have been located in this town. The most important colony was found at the Parker estate on the Billerica road, where over 130 nests were treated on 16 trees. The brown-tail moth is generally present throughout the town. : ; . ; - 1906.] PUBLIC DOCUMENT — No. 73. 81 The gypsy moth is scattered over the entire area of Lin- coln. All woodland tracts, so far as they have been in- spected, are infested. The local superintendent has taken up the work with a great deal of energy, and has been properly supported by the town officials. Asa result, practically all the necessary work against the moths on public trees has been accomplished, and steps are now under way to apply the provisions of the act to private estates. The infested roadside brush in several sections is a source of danger, since it will not be possible to keep the street trees free from the moths unless this brush is thoroughly treated. There exists, most naturally, strong local sentiment against cutting the brush along the highways, and, as an alternative, a great deal of spraying will be necessary in some places. This will materially increase the cost of the work, and a part of the expense may well be borne by those who insist upon this method of fighting the moth. A thorough inspection of the town should be made in the near future. Aside from the spraying mentioned, the trees in the localities infested by the gypsy moth should be burlapped next season and thor- oughly attended. MARLBOROUGH. M. E. Lyons, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, : f . $1,895 80 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : ; -) 13,79) 60 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . ; 5 - 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . A : : : ~ A small gypsy moth colony has been found in the Mount Pleasant Street section of Marlborough, but the brown-tail moth occurs in large numbers over the whole city, particu- larly in the residential district. But little has been done here as yet in the way of fall work, but we have assurances that operations against the moths will be taken up in the near future. It seems probable that a considerable expense will be involved in suppressing the brown-tail moth in this city. The gypsy moth infestation offers no special diffi- culties in the way of treatment. 82 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. MARSHFIELD. W. L. Spracue, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, : ; . $330 35 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : . 660 70 1905, amount expended in work against Sheen osuimated: . \ 60°00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, ; E ; ‘ : - Eight estates in Marshfield have been found infested with the gypsy moth, and the brown-tail moth is generally scat- tered through the town. The gypsy moth infestations are practically all in the central residential district, and have re- ceived thorough treatment. The brown-tail moth nests have been removed from the street trees, and work against them on private estates is now under way and is being prosecuted with commendable vigor. The citizens of this town are awake to the importance of suppressing the moths, and are co-operating to the fullest extent in this work. MAYNARD. LuKE S. Brooks, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, P ‘ ; $704 93 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : , . 1,409 87 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, . 20 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . : , : ; bo Inspection of the roadsides and orchards in this town re- vealed the presence of the brown-tail moth in considerable numbers, and a single estate infested by the gypsy moth. The local superintendent has shown a most commendable activity in prosecuting the necessary work, and has the situa- tion well in hand. Further inspecting will be necessary next season, and the trees in the infested colony should be burlapped and attended. MERRIMAC, GILBERT G. Davis, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . , : . $253 34 1906, amount required before reimbursement, . i ; . 506 68 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, . 240 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, : : , , ; - Ee a ll area ‘Sse ‘PIoJpeTM ‘oouctMmeyT "OD *g “ueH Aq JNO poTAsBo B Se eS F 1906.]. PUBLIC DOCUMENT—No. 73. 83 While Merrimac is generally infested by the brown-tail moth, but a single gypsy moth egg cluster has been found, the infested locality being on School Street, near the central part of the town. Work against the brown-tail moth was begun about December 1, and has been carried on in a satis- factory manner. The trees in and near the section where the gypsy moth egg cluster was found should be burlapped next summer. METHUEN: HENRY WAGLAND, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, : : . $1,030 08 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : ‘ 5 POO ake 1905, amount expended in work against moths, _. 4 : - 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ‘ ‘ : : - Four gypsy moth colonies have been located in this town, and the brown-tail moth is generally abundant, particularly in residential sections. The local work has been organized and carried out ina satisfactory manner. The trees through- out the residential section have been cleared of both species of moths, and work is now under way in the outskirts of the town. The property owners have received notification, and the enforcement of the Jaw on private estates will commence about February 1. The local work has received cordial support both from town officials and from citizens in general. The burlap should be applied and attended next season where the gypsy moth*colonies are located, and a thorough inspec- tion of the town is desirable at an early date. MIDDLEBOROUGH. D. M. Pratt, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, j 3 : $826 29 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : : lage 4 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, . 30 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . : : é : = 9 The gypsy moth has been found in 3 places in Middle- borough, viz., on Rock Street, Everett Street and North Main Street. The infestations are practically of the same nature as occur in other towns in southern Plymouth County, 84 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. only a few nests being found in one place. The brown-tail moth occurs here in small numbers. A great deal of burlapping and other careful work will be necessary here ; but, as the property owners are disposed to co-operate with the local superintendent, we are hopeful that the moths may be promptly suppressed. All necessary work against the moths has been completed in a very satis- factory manner. MIDDLETON. M. J. Emerson, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . : : 5 pee aly 1906, amount required before reimbursement, . : : H vda}s). aif 1905, amount expended in work against moths, : . . 548 28 1905, amount of State reimbursement, ; ‘ ‘ ; . 419 09 The gypsy moth has been found generally scattered in Middleton, but no large colonies as yet have been located. The brown-tail moth is abundant everywhere, particularly in orchards and along roadsides. The most important findings of the gypsy moth were made along the road between Middle- ton and Danvers. A large hotel in the southern part of the town is much visited by summer travel, and the grounds here are quite seriously infested. This colony should have thorough attention to prevent a further scattering of the moth. The trees on the main streets of the town should be burlapped next season. MILTON. NATHANIEL T. KippDER, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, : ; . $2,500 00 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : ; . 86,000 00 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . : : 585 26 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . i : : ‘ - Milton is fortunate in having had for several years the services of a tree warden fully alive to the importance of suppressing the gypsy and the brown-tail moths, and as : result the insects have been kept well under control. Our inspection shows that the gypsy moth is scattered in small numbers throughout the town, including the woodlands in the southern part bordering on the Blue Hills Reservation. e 1906. ] PUBLIC DOCUMENT — No. 73. 85 The brown-tail moth is lightly scattered over the residential part of the town. Practically all the necessary work against the brown-tail as well as the gypsy moth on street trees and private estates of the entire town is completed at this writing. The trees in the places infested with the gypsy moth should be bur- lapped next season, and in certain localities spraying may be necessary. It is also of importance to inspect the woodlands thoroughly at the earliest opportunity. NATICK. Henry S. HUNNEWELL, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ é : $1,325 73 1906, amount required before reimbursement, ; ; . 2,651 45 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . : . - 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ; ; ‘ ; - Upward of 65 private estates in Natick have been found infested by the gypsy moth, with scattering infestation on street trees. The brown-tail moth occurs in average num- bers throughout the town. The local superintendent has under way a more thorough inspection of the town, and we have assurances that the clearing of the street trees will be taken up at an early date. The gypsy moth colonies offer no particular difficulties in the way of treatment, but the trees in them should be burlapped and sprayed next season. This town possesses many beautiful estates, on which numerous fine specimen trees may be found. It is of the utmost importance, therefore, that the moth be exterminated here, or brought thoroughly under control at the earliest possible date. NEEDHAM. Ernest E. Rivey, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ ‘ ‘ $808 24 1906, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ : . 1,616 48 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . i F 105 97 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . F ‘ ; : = This town is generally infested by both the gypsy and the brown-tail moths. The inspection of roadsides and orchards 86 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. has shown some 26 gypsy moth colonies, principally in the Highlandville section. The brown-tail moth is scattered in average numbers over the town. The gypsy moth colonies should be easily brought under control if the present hearty co-operation of the local authorities is continued. The necessary local work is in progress, and has been carried out in a very satisfactory manner. Further inspection of the woodland should be made at the earliest possible moment. NEWBURY. BENJAMIN PEARSON, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . ‘ ; . $239 36 1906, amount required before reimbursement, . : ; a) aoe 1905, amount expended in work against moths, : ; 2 049533 1905, amount of State reimbursement, : : ‘ ; : - The egg clusters of the gypsy moth have been found scat- tered throughout Newbury, being particularly abundant in the Oldtown section, where as many as 20 nests have been found on a small estate. The most important infestations are along the main road leading to Newburyport. About one-half of the street trees have been cleared of both gypsy and brown-tail moths by the local superintendent, and the work is in progress at this writing. The trees in the sec- tions infested with the gypsy moth should be burlapped next season, and spraying will be necessary in a few localities. A number of large orchards which are infested should be sprayed. The condition of the woodland in this town has not been determined, but an effort will be made to have it inspected during the winter and spring. NEWBURYPORT. Tuomas T. Urron, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ; P . $2,162 17 1906, amount required before reimbursement, : : . 4,324 85 1905, amount expended in work against MOUS es . . 1,266 84 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . ; : ; : - From its topographical position the condition of New- buryport is of particular importance, since nearly all the travel to New Hampshire points passes through it, and any 1906.] PUBLIC DOCUMENT — No. 73. 87 moth colonies existing here are a source of danger to a wide- spread area. The gypsy moth has been found generally scattered throughout all parts of the city, and the brown-tail moth is notably abundant. A thorough inspection of the city has been made, with the result that nearly every section has been found infested with the gypsy moth. The largest number of colonies was found in the residential section. Many of them were of considerable size, over 100 nests being found on a single estate. The residential section was cleared of the brown-tail moth nests in the spring of 1905, and as a result there was but little damage by these cater- pillars during the summer. In November and December the local superintendent, with a small gang of men, carried on work against both insects on the public shade trees. It has appeared to be difficult to secure a suitable number of employees to carry on the work to greatest advantage, and, as a consequence, only about one-fourth of the public trees have been cleared of the moths. Steps are now being taken to increase the force of men, and it is expected that the entire city will be covered before the egg clusters of the gypsy moth hatch, next spring. A great deal of very careful work will be necessary here to keep the gypsy moth under control. The trees in the entire city should be burlapped next season and carefully attended; in addition, spraying will be needed in the worst-infested sections. NortH ANDOVER. PETER Hout, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, : . . $891 65 1906, amount required before reimbursement, 2 : aio e829 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, . 805 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . : ; : : = Gypsy moths were first found in 1904 in this town. An examination in the summer of 1905 by an inspector from this office showed the insect to be present in about half a dozen localities. The town as yet has not been completely scouted, and this work should have attention next year. Burlapping will be necessary on trees in the known gypsy 88 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. [Jan. moth colonies. The brown-tail moth is present in aver- age numbers. As yet but little has been done by the local authorities, owing in part to the important business in- terests of the local superintendent ; but we have assurances that a vigorous campaign against the two insects will be com- pleted during the winter months. Norty READING. F. Howarp Mossman, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . ; F . $133 73 1906, amount required before reimbursement, . ; ' op S267 AT 1905, amount expended in work against moths, : ; . 288 55 1905, amount of State reimbursement, : a : : : - The southern and eastern sections of North Reading are generally infested by the gypsy moth. The roadsides in this district contain numerous colonies, and nearly every old apple orchard shows specimens of both brown-tail and gypsy moths. The general infestation by the gypsy moth is un- fortunate because of the amount of woodland in the town. It should be checked before it has opportunity to spread farther. Already a considerable wooded area lying near Haverhill and Pleasant streets is generally infested, and a colony of importance has been located on the town farm at Park Street. The work of the local superintendent is now under way, and is being carried on in a satisfactory manner. A great deal of cutting and burning of worthless trees will be necessary, together with burlapping and spraying, next season, in order to hold the gypsy moth in check, and many miles of infested roadsides should have attention. The local operations to date have been properly supported by the selectmen. NORWELL. Joun H. SPARRELL, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . . ‘ . $167 46 1906, amount required before reimbursement, . : ; silt poe, Ol 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, : 85 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, : ; : ; ‘ - Inspector Harry B. Ramsey located the gypsy moth early in August at 10 different places in Norwell. A thorough ‘COBT ‘ounrg ‘zojseTOUTM ‘pPAByoIO ved poeyooTseuU UT sIB]IId10480 YOU [IB}]-UMOIq JO SOsvABY if » 5 Sy a! 1906. } PUBLIC DOCUMENT —No. 73. 89 inspection of the residential section of the town is now com- pleted, and no additional infestations have been discovered. The local superintendent has cleared the street trees of both species of moths, and has also performed the work necessary on private estates. The infested sections will require bur- lapping and careful attention next year. - The brown-tail moth is more or less distributed over the residential portion of the town, but so far as known it has not yet invaded the woodlands. Norwoop. Frank H. Winstow, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, : : - $1,025 55 1906, amount required before reimbursement, ‘ : 20a e099 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, . 15 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . : : : ‘ - Four gypsy moth colonies have been found in Norwood. None of them are of large size, but in one case the infesta- tion is complicated by a number of hollow trees, which must be either removed or cemented. The brown-tail moth is not abundant here, and, if the gypsy moth infestations receive thorough treatment next season, the problem of suppressing the insects should not prove a difficult one. A limited amount of work has been done against the moths by the local superintendent. The entire town should have a thorough inspection at*the earliest possible date. PEMBROKE. CaLviIn S. WEstT, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . : ; . $189 78 1906, amount required before reimbursement, . : ‘ . 39 56 1905, amount expended in work against moths, - . : 95 18 1905, amount of State reimbursemeat, : : : 5 2 - In the latter part of August the gypsy moth was found in this town by the State inspector, and since that time 12 addi- tional infestations have been located. As in the case of other towns in this vicinity, the moth was found widely scattered, as no more than a single nest as a rule was found in any particular locality. A few brown-tail moth webs 90 GYPSY AND BROWN-TAIL MOTHS. ([Jan. have been found in the town. Nearly all the necessary work against both species of moths has been done in a very satis- factory manner by the local superintendent. The sections infested by the gypsy moth should be burlapped and care- fully attended next season. PLYMOUTH. GEORGE R. Brices, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, ; : . $1,869 74 1906, amount required before reimbursement, ; ; ao Sian) 2/ 1905, amount expended in work against moths, . : “ - 1905, amount of State reimbursement, . i i ‘ : - The infestations of the gypsy moth in Plymouth are of particular, importance because of the immense amount of summer travel which finds its way here. We are unable at this writing to state how badly the town is infested, but already the moth has been found scattered in small numbers throughout the entire residential section, and a single nest has been found at Long Pond village and at Darby Pond. The large amount of woodland in Plymouth should be thoroughly inspected at the first opportunity. A great deal of camping takes place here each summer, one of the circum- stances that render the camp sites in the wooded area peculiarly liable to infestation by the moth. The brown- tail moth has been kept under control in past years by the efficient local superintendent. At this writing work against both species of moths is being prosecuted vigorously and in a very satisfactory manner. Burlapping will be neces- sary next year wherever the gypsy moth exists. PLYMPTON. ZinA E. SHERMAN, Local Superintendent. 1905, amount required before reimbursement, . ; ; - $66 24 1906, amount required before reimbursement, . : : me ley yks) 1905, amount expended in work against moths, estimated, ; 25 00 1905, amount of State reimbursement, ; : : : ‘ ~ Six small gypsy moth colonies have been found in widely separated localities in this town.