‘ital it wha Lom PemmAaf ase ia hin sinew Der Dine Vine hig vis ra ‘ nn a aevcie on STATE OF NEw YORK. er ve M ENT. OF AGRICU LAURE. NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. For THE YEAR I9QOI. TRANSMITTED TO THE LEGISLATURE JANUARY 13, 1902. ALBANY: J. B. LYON COMPANY, STATE PRINTERS. 1902. AAU AUIItOA O- savoleetil 1OQ1 HAS aHT FO : (QAR py ee 4. 2K AR wien pat) } @OOr Sf UHATYLL naopetetirt cy or nw Saletan eal i ain ot Stare OF NEW YORK. No. 59. IN ASSEMBLY, JANUARY 13, 1902. NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Commissioner of Agriculture. To the Honorable, the Legislature of the State of New York: In accordance with the provisions of the statutes relating thereto, I have the honor to herewith submit the ninth annual report of the Department of Agriculture of the State of New York for the year ending September 30, 1901. C. A. WIETING, Commissioner of Agriculture. ROBT Eb vsxaurviaG cahse oun Yo. Hate BA Jo sustniaiyid 4a S60 oA0 i Potialey eototete thi to amoteiyany) sith a iW souabcng Layne Aint if) tind atten oF. nomad od? orn Ut i ¥ WOH Yo sti af to outlinleA to Santee att Yo. $e we: ORL: 0G Coton pati huts ay, att coh told io AOC RD ; Atninwk Yo Gandeaiimel) DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. LIBRARY NEW YORK BO TANICAL Commissioner. CHARLES A. WIETING, Cobleskill, N. Y. Assistant Commissioners. PUR UPEV ASLO. 3 anna bevy ain at S (AA MA ZW Ak WEVA De 2 1a ear pie es ong Caan Sa ane AIO Am Whit avimacawn, as ake novi ey OR are wat vit Awe BS oe morass 4 AMS HAGE Ae nee Wk Mata Ab de # ‘aiear RAI BAG! PS. hs ORS ARONA HOt | : iv) £ lrwogh at) anisnctsla sy. BOWER AIRE. buses Gace ah iy oe Aiea \ Beem ) siti ila, 10 ; ¥ A oon ett hs bet ae Eee + ANS ENE: eee col fee tena A vile eet i rie De SAAD te. | ioe 4 a es swigtos 4610 We LOhibe dt) unernocnodded HOdatHC wee. 4605 vy. Courtney ......-.. qanoce Seas oy 4b29 V. SCOBAL vocccccccccccceccacesce 4603 Vv. Pickens .....0000 cscees wccee . 2872 V. Hutcheon .....ccsccsrconseres 4612 November 30, 1900. V. B@YeT) ..cccccccccccccccccseces 4562 We MICOGH) saclisisiaiciciele/eiete sid eleicienleier 4475 UV IOULEIUGH cic iaicle’eisieivie sloleelnioteimiatetaia)= 4559 Ws IGEILCITO! Je cle = slefera ole 'n)clule wielelelsisia 4604 v. Lohrsen .......+.+. ai a\aretsveiereters 4495 VIN Ohi cc cte cite cencince cele sa eueios «4 4004 V.. Seefert .ccccccccccccccescessss 4497 Ve WaT rece cc ciclo nislarvieloiaicielelareie\ule 4606 v. Behn Bos. ....-.ccescccceess 4541 Ws WWOLECIS) cicicicclecicleiee seis sleen'elee's 4552 Vie KROL Pate atoieiclsisieiete sna thelemts2 4494 December 10, 1900. We ISELUTICKS vercieie o's ieie\eiela!n.alviv\nieloleisis 4622 Val ESLOMUINET | v\-\0eje!ele\clsiviclesorslolet= nies 4538 Wi, OSLO Oia inyete vesicle ciaieie!olelnietareiove 4500 WML TPG: verevcisinieisietelsiehejs)es slolclsleinle 2829 Ys MEVOW.ETI). claieierevaisleieielrorstersiaaiiake store 4600 Wawa WAC ky siseisieisieleielelslaieeloletels 4617 VPM SINYCLONY ve: clelsters'olatolsfolelolafeioreieiei=isinle 4551 December 22, 1900. vy. Fraser & Dean Co........... 2942 January 7, 1901. vy. Columbia Tea Company.... 4469 Var SMV GOL t o: gmme 2838 Wa WOULD ws chipeaiesiineslasiclroetacs 4877 Vs HE SEOUC cis o sislele te winvelelalo\s)e\nlare(s(ataln 3326 OF THE CasE No. People v. Bochow ........-sseeceseesees ADS6 People v. Marlowe .....:.eseereeceevees 4057 People v. Bller .....-.-sseeeecssseeceeee 4568 People v. TobiaS ........+sspeeceeeecees 4592 People V. RYAN 2... ...ceeecccssceessccen 4584 People v. Moriety .......--:seeeeeeeeees 3269 People v. Hayes ....-.-seeeececeeceeceee 2927 People v. Strunck ........- sseseeeeeee 4615 People v. Holzer .........escecesccccvee 4594 People v. Serenger ...--s++esseeeeeeee . 4569 >; — ——F January 16, 1901. People Vv. Do0e ........-ee eee cce cep ececce 4470 People v. Kierman ........-+e.sseereeee 4558 People Vv. Risch .......-secscsseccrcecee 4599 People v. Boscher ........... spighaiers San 4628 People v. Heilshorn .........++++++eeee- 4476 People v. Tompkins ........++.0. severe 4595 People v. Bischoff ...........+seeeeeeee 4585 People v. Blumberg .....-...+ eseeeseee 4597 People v. Schroeder ..........+++++++++- 4629 People v. GOOSS .....-ceeeeseececceccees 4638 People v. Kuhlman .........e+seeeeeees 4630 People v. Krinsky .....-..+ sseeesseeees 4640 People v. Allen ..........++. pidldisaheles aa . 2814 People v. Reffert ........ acicleletetiaters © aiqgee AOnee February 11, 1901. People v. Moyenhan Bros........- 3106, 3107 People v. Collins ..........++++++- 3124, 3126 People v. McDonald & Sons .........-.. 3128 People v. Bellman .......+.++e+seeeeees 4582 People v. Taylor .......--+ss-scseseeee 4625 People v. Murphy ........-.+++sseeseees 4647 People v. Buglosky .......-+.++++++ee0 4637 People v. Willner ...........sseeeeceeee 4614 People v. Mehrtens .........--.+e+e+ee 2725 People v. Dunker .........+seeeeeeeeees 4619 People v. Lynch .......++..+ eee eeeees . 4616 People v. Dunphy ...........seeseeerees 4648 -——__—_} February 21, 1901. People V. Do€ ...cccceeeeceecececceecets 4305 People V. DO@ ...eceeeee eee seeeeeee cree 3310 People v. White .....-..seeeseeeeceeeees 4596 People v. Wellbrock ..........++-+++++ 4632 People v. Banker ......... esssseeeesees 4642 People v. Gordon ....-...+eseeeeee eeeee 4303 People v. MacMahon ........-+-+++++++ 4460 People Vv. ROWAN ....-.eeeeceseeereerees 4634 March 12, 1901. People v. LeOVY .cceeee se ecee cee eeeeecees 4313 People V. DO€ ......--eeseececcenecncccs 4311 People v. Hecker .......-seeseeseeeeeee 4308 People V. DO€ ..cecececesceceevercereers 4491 People V. DO@ ..ceceeecsseecsencereceees 2882 April 8, 1901. People v. Bockman .......ss++eeseerees 4639 People v. McGloin .......+. ceseeeeeeee 4540 People v. Schult .....-..seeeeeeeeeereers 4565 People v. Moriarity ......++s-e++eeeeere 4307 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 11 CAasE NO. May 24, 1901. People v. Courtney ...ce..eseceeeeeeees 4635 CasE No People v. Davis Bros. .........-.--00+- 2727 People v. Brock ......scsccscsssesecsece 4351 People v. Derenthal ...........0.6- 000: 4310 People v. Keeler & Hogan........ 4336, 4317 People v. Berwind ..........seeeeeeeees 4329 People v. Bradley & Warren........... 4341 Paonleave Braccht ica seocse ae dasencnsa: 4618 People Vv. Smith 00. cccccccscecrssceneee 4331 POG! VAP MCVCIs ielccee ces <2 sacle enines seine 2466 May 25, 1901. SS Be ae ROR Hy COMP ss eeag ening peO sy Peopiay) Bisel 11514 .2) 4033, 818, 819, 4032 People v. Doe & Roe.............-.-eees 4314 Beasts vAneolenig ie ee nase 4003, 4004 PBODIGIVs | DOO) eiciclece cael vicjolsjaisleeicleristore& 4318 People v. Block ...4050, 4049, 4048, 4047, 4046 Ph 4045, 4009, 4008 eee atc Le agy_-PooPle v. Douglass.....311, 3112, $118, 814 eop » AWRUITS Gabaso acne goconosno0ene People v. Forepaugh & Sells’ Circus.. .... Sse ah ae al ae ea sia People Vv.) Frankel \. 2. ccccccccccets ccicess 4342 September 10, 1901. People v. Strunck ................--+-+- AIeY Sean le)v ig LV OCs) coisas onesie asians cee 4608 People v. Van Zandt .............-... 4340 People v. Van Arsdale ............. 8780 IPGODIGR Yc DAWA) steve /oiela\ »iale)sivielcreleletesaie/aie «1 4302 a People v. ZeisenitZ .......cccce ceceseee 2734 September 13, 1901. Peo plowvy,. pHMENES 55: bipicre es cpispeicte euteloies 2738 PEODlONV2 LCMtziy. « vere Fillmore. ‘ ISNOD WILL) vo aes once cistsiviceiss s'els(e'w vin (G02) MECATUNY Sc cre ree ee ce en Bishopville. BIAGe MEORee Ie fart mies atete'< © c.2 siete cums i) pee IDL Chobe eer caigtc qe “eeoeor Black Creek. PSV OOK BIGGS qe scle lessleniets cce:s avolsiewe oie MiG OT OTs ac cone a. ter gsi Rushford. Browill sas. ied ose oaees -bing vee BGA IBLO WR eset ec- see eae eae Andover. ATO WD) araccieies.s Elm Valley. LD b pat AW IIS 2 998 SERS dee Seasincenersy is TW, SEPA BGOM coos Gere ties be oe Elm Valley. ID rey Ode Sereouaobe coco babar capeaea TAPE OSZOOUS cateeiteres Sele eles ete Galen. Menner7s OUI Cyc = sien sfoisereniein > «10 LDP Le Mepchals eq reagdan saa dc oe Alfred Station. IQ racks AS ase oobetoe recor ane WouneyG) MOUS. cease ease .+-» Fillmore. Pave! Gorners 25h. . 23s Re -5 32 Coie / Germantt) . 4266 2 eek Alfred. WMOLGPBSTOOK wiecas eto tees was alee eae Carmody 61 C0226 a FE; CES WGNMSrs sce acec act nee ees es Almond. Eee pias eteieis s.sitie ciate aia, als, opaicraretstevs Ws elacikett: tc00.cc eee Wellsville. TUL SR AVAL S 0s me aiere'e Rene piotels ire ate) ole A. Tt Bollers.. cs. Ser mae, eee Fillmore. Mt. Monroe .........--.-+.+2e00+% Cit GRottitzsycinmess mieten eres Rushford. New Hudson Centre ............ 11 Gs ME DAV G ch ope es eS Black Creek. North Branch .............-..++. Ti FU HoagE esi ies. Goce a> s ert Friendship North Cuba Creamery .......... omer. Je ASG stip. a. oie cies tei North Cuba. WRECK fcc. ope lich tere rhs ee tai. Chas. NiuUspichkelys 226k 0. hte Dalton. (Shifts sts) P- o ede Sm ae aqprie rece Oko Aco Hh) ARIORISY craic eas tesonicieia nie Sate Belfast. Pan American cons. ca ecessicdemes WV i CU sasic ares seis a aiee Bennett. PetroliattiiGasconse ie ook Ades ane DD: We Wictenisns sss ces eneseena: Petrolia. IPAILIPSICTECK . 5% oe. onaecesieis en OCKermamees Ose ss <-65\s' sees Phillips Creek. Pleasant (Valley: 0.5 02 .-t os eens CLOW. Germania .ccsk sete eee Alfred. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 24 ALLEGANY—Concluded. NAME OF FACTORY. Applicant. Post-office. POdONGUE He J noah ieete tite he aie's vieieieie's Mite SEIARG OL GON a.) )== Ahrens & sZetwiCGk:...tecc..s.00.00.¢ East Otto. LivigzeG kort Se BRnapoaeorco cca dooODoOe SLI, MOWENSie an cstisaehbireccucrce Freedom. MELON BPO O Reg oo voisicle olatsialers/claisseisyelefe Jolin vbw denkelescce sate sacinc ce Ellicottville. Glen Brook, NOs2ssiodels «=/o.s/eperecsic JON) Wee kenkcel poise atacverciejossere;-1 iotore = ta)afolo ia te¥ei che hicsere\siere, lake (OB eens Cee sor Asopoeuoe. East Randolph. WACOM OSTEVE)) © vic cticisrslelelvrcivzeisie'ais sie JORNMIWAMNICAG ams .ceemiessicies ce Leon. NG COMMU GI ore ieinteialeselovcinyelsieeiriniaiciate ER ASD BINVOT crete ein steele rahe steiesciats Leon. duime Brook INOMs1 | ci. <0\.221s/0si0= cee EH aera cha koatetetatetere ote s)eloniele/elave\siers\= Otto. Little Valley No. 2.......cesceeee J. W. Clair & Co We eS aero: Little Valley. Lower Haskell .........-...-..-- AES dis Lie 87g Gan caso Coduondoc . Olean. GV TULON, cays cctarcieeie tareisiesiche aissie(ainiec BESCUINE NEO ASC Face oss clecahsipielaie wre. aici ae] Franklinville. Ni PLeH GTOVC tera cainteteiyacies cleleleisiasns Geos Hy GEGEN sep iecieeleleleiojecciaisie.si- Arcade. UAV TATG! (oa'e ejetmaletslataysseisile <’e ascjesielsic Ahrens & Zetwick..... Lieejarayets/ale East Otto. INADICT einen cominsteke cleberetsiale nicls s/sieieicte Re PERSE Wellvattte oapeipbtcisies\ciaisieies Franklinville. Nine Mile Union ................ Ee OPA tON DME Serre eseivierei-laieisints Allegany. North, Napoli NON Sic dooaececcnce PW OL ALT ROCHNS O ertantne cinis (> «ie. e/e Little Valley. NOUR MV allleyiar maniackhe ove t.sierersciaiece ANSON UUISSe ek o.ciawieie bi oiel<<]-(ol elo caie Little Valley. NGS Pasdoscadcosdansoaopucnderob0Gs EE WWALLOV EM see xictole(eieleie!=/=/-tvalel Haskell Flats. OELONCTESCENEG ic cirtsicic cieveine siieiseie nie la fsrartsholy Jeb dba pac agasee Ge Sado > Otto. OLEGONO: Lega face a anisleec eaveieve oi W. H. Klens...............-.++: Otto. OTLOMING 212i aictas ecco seclee swine siete em Wa ede ORRSIOTE Seceraiecare sialei atenforn eanreieetes Otto. BIOLIVSDUT EE pele sicteinaleureieeliciatee/sPolere sie IDA ViSky ort! 6 Sagem aodaSrruc[ Perrysburg. PLEO ssicistsaicto ole cies gisoreejecdoeieteie neers John VE) Withee iieys01- js es Plato. Pleasant. Valley ce caw a-= ss sive'se (DAMS be istoo ns hase aa comocenecnon- Hinsdale. Legbilliatth ol pega mesenage Ges Onoon Bs ED TNO IN Se i fopslore or atorainderg Franklinville. ANG ANOING: Adpccekblesicsiscissieciwene TEUWio CLBAT RG NGO’ were areis ois ssefaraelt Little Valley. Randolph NON Weccesinetaecis/sielecis ne ZAenas) CAarpevters cis ave cise vc «cisare East Randolph. Randolph INO: Zinsicclesise acc. «cies Fenas® (CarPOnter sieve. serecleiacv-imlets East Randolph. Wandolph! (NO. 48. assoc eclncs one cele Zonas. CArpenitel ean. 4 +ir silanes East Randolph. VAI OUD ID VIN Ones 's cjeieikis air’ s'e/oletetslsie's Zenas Carpenter... .0..00.0.+ 06 East Randolph. GA eEIGUSG Ns olen acleechios ecm ciceG Mrs. H. J. Marsh Red House. Riceville Ashford. Hock spring Union. »..........08 Chas. SHUCAY Utils cig ohiicieia's eet eFe Springville. WROSS ONO ty Lic winarecnisrsisicintesie/e'ei ob e/aieie's Hype ORS Aes UC Or terse select alate Gowanda. eT OSICY GING: sian cicisisiaieinic se ''s (so siaiais sin imiate Sandusky. Sanausicy: NOs 1s, secoden > Gees ical « Js BS Mle WAG Mer wisi ania aap it oretew iets ate Sandusky. SehemtZe) as nc recs: wots cmon se aw cies Aus ESS ANGER o) ca,s) wipiois} angie at istrt=lele lionel Ashford. RBICOLE ede nts cectosmeceser res ceet's se M. F. Gampp .........0.+-000+s Otto. RON GCA oeteinic nics vee inicio Mea wreion bes Frank Lawrence.........---+..«- West Salamanca. SOUR DAVLONUN Os (Aca tdeiecies:ceinsie FA DORSOVR caste Valse s Neslese aw eisiaie South Dayton. South Dayton No. 3.......6.sccee: J.) DOESOMSresass. <1 as erelevents .seees SOUthH Dayton. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 23 CaTraraucus—Concluded. NAME OF FACTORY. Applicant. Post-oflice. South Napoli No. Aa ive (Glebe (4 OMS opr cpcogepeede Little Valley. Spring Brook No. GU AEPBUSRISE ce tecitel-losinele'siei- New Albion. Spring Brook No. G@! TA BUSHASE es saicct ceiineneis aisle New Albion. Spring Brook No. GES BWSEASE eee cleisleleteiat-ic ciciei-iciinie New Albion. Spring Brook No. Henry rd nGoOulds cece oe cne. cca Cattaraugus, Spring Brook No. Cee BUSKISttans walte(eiatectaelcine'ein= New Albion. Spring Brook No. Foe CHAS VNVGISNAM Metis cle ns cen es cone Maples. Spring Brook No. sei HAS.) WGESHaM acta setae tao s\sieie(e aici Maples. Spring Valley) oo. 0.6 -)..).4 .. W. T. Peaslee & Son........... Bast Randolph. Sl) Jaeeorpoes FS eer cones o0Oe Hl GE. ei aRrin Seton, car. a Franklinville. SEBO oleae ccteiciois: viel eiaintale ¢ vivrqcicrsisivne A eacUn 283 INA Oompa sare eenocoe Franklinville. SEOLYi dels olcte's cisisiatoleieibietejejaislsis/eaisleisisiele Eis PEO. (SEOD Vier ciisiaatee ci-isre aero elore0 Steamburg. Tarbell’ Su arM inves cwmicicl-0es:05006 WiEWOP UN aelh SERA OAS a rape Farmersville. A ENLOTI fee hae he cists te lereisleisiaiete, «irie.ereisielsie Ahrens & Zetwick.............- East Otto. Vedder Corners ...........-+-00e- in Eke WOT EB eeisiets on em ejdiciniaiclele/ csc. a.% Aya Sherburne. PAPO UGB TOOIGs as votes atk usac nine Standard Dairy (Cort as.. Chesser New York City. CLINTON. PemeCi& By Conre ries: oes ele Perttrrcm ie COM err caasetesee Peru. Salmon River sas. oscecese sieceane ASD? Boomhower i222 sms scents Plattsburgh. SMITHGAale anccoe cscs soohsswotacan AS Di Boombhowensy =..cs26 ss c00e Plattsburgh. CoRTLAND. Belisriap: ©..') st. wyerseecieteae ete cies, orsieciare Geos, Salisburnyt....c4 2 te cecn ences Willett. UTUIS) «. 3:2)scis cele eee ele wip isleiaiele ANI Pett a CRC ts es cae ots. aictciove a ccote Chenango. Cuvier Hill iweraterr sd: scceeesee HUTS) JOHMSOMPELES.L © sired sa0:05 00% Cuyler. Dairymen’s UWNLONG 4s sjcia- occ nsiee Chas, )WaiiBeattiel.... 15. .500001 46 Truxton. PTOUEN DE CKA oe seca este Seinen ciscies Sa PblOllenDBCKE satis teisi.-c asic ae Texas Valley. ARCSTOR., Giver « atentr eb as, oie 8 coavshe C3, Kieslerteh. 25.2 tees iasevesade Marathon. Maple: Groves). fete tiisds acicirsniescseis Geo HeWOd a)... Fe osiet osccacsce ~ Truxton. MG GTA Wes 2 « cin.na siccgaaha date aie a eoteoy Seiler Buss ahs Sores = so oa ee Newark, N. J. MeaACH aris: ie tuaeere bappete ys :914;0.21015 Cecil D. Meacham.... ......... Marathon. Otselie: Centre eis rig aicptes «\='s 50-8 = FI: D: JORRSONE ...%..25; ...... Upper Lisle. SSCOGE: sce cars Ss are phe Rewer eioe ehs aie caren eyote By, eSB OEHeR. Sb kccicrgcnscan Scott. MIGAPS 508 is va leccminaelvea ee ae czaleecs ale Hi LBS CALS seats cp bactk become Cortland. hd Se) Geo, eine be SED e Adelbert? Panbox Wi. 22s. 20... ce Marathon. Ware il, ‘Cold (Sprieicsias le. \<\<020. Coe Spencer. : Ate es scaseute Virgil. WASTE AIS: ct on pee tee ee tea, ere te Homer Wiehtmanis: 2) 00.2.0. Marathon. ERIE. lear Creeks INO; Tic. siis cess overseas Ue AC. BPI DANO: 2 anes ase ciee ine Collins Centre. lear CreeictNG., 2c. .ceee + +s sue WS) Al BrigQa nd cg... «ees seis eae Boston. Clear Creek No. 3....... Pe ennae | pene Cfied Bk =a sii 0: Pe pe y Ae Rey Collins Centre. CléesrCreek NO. 4%... Wi Keremeers S.fecicdtinel cttorcie tere Herkimer. ISU Poneeeeaeen|4 4200 ch sfostosone TIGL eamilcink 14 sane ata osx oeiaers Little Falls. WnidianiG@astle! 2. ccislteebiek oii-t\ FAM Cards es. cel aeee oesre ten cle Utica. SIOHES;, res. SCANNER Ry ratsvavereley« BE TONES hts i.e ehrcistee siete nts Centre. FOLAAaAN Ville: 2.5 lhs HTM Seeks wis ae Ae Season on dcocimagaedos Jordanville. Kast BEIGZE o/c ae cae aeplet teloies bre AS Countryman kine sseieleks -ai8% Countryman. 13G ha REPRE b.c35.>,8 Pechmeetee SULTAN Terese hr dave chats Store terecleroioys Little Falls. LL ichab het emennaaobcou. loLcds On anon ATi 1848 IDE} oy ah ba) Ne enek eam Age Russia. MANtS iSe Pig, ST eee ae lao ictece Sop iMG PE Hee c thosiner sd scleiasys East Schuyler. NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ho fo) HErRKIMER—Concluded. NAME OF FACTORY. Applicant. Post-office. Abt © ALIS, «035i onicte ble fei wees) MGward! Simmons. A06 «seine ca vee Little Falls. Little Lakes ........csesereceeene John .McNamaraisc.s.cccsecccers Richfield Springs. Manheim Cold Spring .........-. Johns Cl MOXacen soe dae ce scree Ingham Mills. Maple Grove ioc. o0its ceases ccsece J. W.. Windecker. .).:.../....0008 Little Falls. Mather. As) Bieiwsiesycts:aaiquaiticcica tine 5p LD WSs pW UROUP IRD a sied.fciss «0's -». Norway. PIC ATERUT | Ds tae seiseleseiassis m= > Daniel MCATtHUIs i wicricss<\c\s sis Grant. McEvoy, R. S PSs LCR OV ictadeesectapicieres:s:<'-'s)0i0 Cold Brook. McNierney ........-.-- cio. e'c16, 0/6) OFSsts MUUC INDOITI OMG sipstoetaidiso/a0.2/) 1001s Newport. Middleville .............. DST ROL Gots iatctoe/siniatd ote 2s) s1< .-. Middleville. Millers AUIS) Sostases caiceda is. se ieive Essie) UCT retains cease 64 -. Millers Mills. Murphys Criscserh “anise rle =e SOUN Oa wll Diecast sss) els Norway. Mutual Milk & Cream Co...... eid OLE) SIVEC HOILG fretaten IE cleo o'> df oiotese Gravesville. New Manheim joey scene 6 sis e JOR, Garlock .wamecep pent sss e-iee Little Falls. INGWDOrG BUI saptencmcieci cient =i WAS Brayton cee is... c os cate Poland. INGWiVdLIG ete sele ee celseiarenye ociniels sie OPISUNC AE WAT wa attiere state sss ais ses - Newville. QOS eam eisisitatcneisd rab Yasia aide oie /s's sie) Wil SMI GIKGrronyiasiciaae «ete «see one Middleville. North Witehfield 2... .4-0--- +. +0 } ES He Dawisea. dae ace «=< North Litchfield. North Winfield No. 1........... SCL, WWHPClOCK. wee dia: ae <'o po'o\sas North Winfield. INOKWAY ssn ie cassiseimadsices es seis Biden (Oy UNptel relies saa Aeuar a Sopot Norway. Norway Association ............ apa inlien Uuliiye oe8. 65 ase benemaoo& Newport. ONION ereniiasss oesaa eric siniowie'sisieie Christ Marder eee eee scl Gray. OMG Winkiivic Gl Sa deeacoceee ones SOW UE (Wartime. cctec)cis0 <2. 010 Fairfield. (Oialivtwelietely HoaaeseeapooceTneon o JOSn) RACE! Sarceresiters win tu lcuie's.o ars .. Manheim. Old Salisbury (| PAIS Eon RASA bas Gausonduacsdeoves Salisbury. Paines Hollow Géo. Van. Slykesare ieee: eo nee Edicks. ileimitemeel BABABsoue te) tanc John Carmeyiina- seria sees «0/010 Middleville. (Poi sl Baqowgarocceno op oc ee Aordis WER 1H aL -154\5 5 see oo sedesoce Poland. Qaiiilevinioaccar se cic samiccincie\sieleore Un Airis Fin iNe Raps aemnonsennes Ilion. Ransom, C. W Chast Wa SOMi eae ssl Dolgeville. REICKATOG ress erecicises an desclecss 2 JONM RACK Ary weer. 2/2) -niene'e Cullen. RAST SCAT cc ciciers crac co eisslelsicleleloters 7) ANGu ged MOMMA te eels clltccicce Scie ele Paines Hollew. RAUL Vawer etaveidiatais atolers + ejuleisicjerers cise aiersie [Opal Clshlele tie ae Ae are sacnbunOOor Newport. SANG ET oasis tabiitls «cele ee Ge0E Lay WGOG eka cis i tees eles Herkimer. Schuyler Centennial ............. Ws. Vi UMN OGURA Re Sete sees s niece Minott. BHCOME LOOK. orice tee eiten eis ae cere 26, \G..Gs Bapcockanse. «cs. oe soselenic Newport. SHeIISF BUSH a. Jeccteeaeiearr selene FRODET ER WiOOd esete ieierece sts sis -tersieleis Herkimer. PETALES MESH weiaeicisissicie oeicielsinre rele) « Adami) Casler sancweeisssoceese .. Little Falls. Sto theheveye ao By aUenoO anc. Taeeneaen « Geo. ISprivigenre tas .sjcess wciscle Jordanville. SHED Ie besieucdnounnb too caUpaOapor DA WiG! (GOLGCOUN ae. acini seats Countryman. Sterline | Crecl:) lmesdeiesiiels cs «= « C.G: Babencktaee iasnatse- - 2 sei Newport. W. Windfield Creamery........ «Cr oVAStSI S. ceetree acbel-wtiels cst cele West Winfield. IWwatiter Creeks .\... Zollerts.. 22) oie: ~- .. Little Falls. ZOMeEr INO: HS jnclteiteoteehieciee eee ee Jacob) Zoller ,-..3.-.. \ivcereceees Little Falls. JEFFERSON. CAS OER occ inva lcnetactitsnes o:05 66 LEE Dips. 6. cecceed sede Rices. IBADCOCK) oov ce sittelactcan Meine ..-... Woodville. MBE MROCIC Hehe cnet oh a ials were G. W. Augsbury........--.....- Plessis. MOR NCTECKE) oiriisistek ee tens ln ae a © Bs SW. SEL RUZ eieb. oot. lern abelian Three Mile Bay. CPOUIG Teen bt lds eG Eeete cokes oi Ss Ni Gowbdlneeintt des clesecuie'es » Evans Mills. Hadsell & Moore .+.............- G.. i Onvisuetraccie ih.de seer ce's Felts Mills. ish ST Clee 0 ae A. | ee COL Brien geade cnc cehereleinaiianne Theresa. EV OW ATU Sietete tars /atacnys tet ede eG rie nieces D, Fis Scullleticcn leone cession Stone Mills. Jefferson Valley .......-2-.ee0-+ Fi, Tay Waren seis ois’: sie ois miei Theresa. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 2 J EFFERSON—Concluded. NAME OF FACTORY. Applicant. Post-office. Wa PAT SOV ILC Wash waite ctaiciatals pis «'0 Se Arnon Ale tercetacmac sieves ie elc:alcterere New York City. Gorraine Village, css ..j-.-...- ond ESE) LEG ais SHES Sab Gop podoceras . Lorraine. Maple (Grovesiseudessassiedss +. se eo ae en gLEIC LING a iersieye em ictaersiaicicia.sicisiars Lorraine. MALROReDLOS= sacscisste satis. Seer WEEE Oy raresiste ae iieie cisisl Carpenter 62.50 as. ole Ox Bow. FROGMATE VALLAL EC aaeicicinetes sacle no.0 a IVE Grey ANY LLSO lhtcetetey< aisle cyete siei= Deer River. SCATIN Sisters veleicistere nicest seis Wil bis Glare ersollem ics scis cc cane e's Port Leyden. BLCTIING: Siniclaeis au cae coe eee Robert WiwAlew < cle cee ol «i Sterlingbush. ILOCVENS: oy sicmaiate we seielee ch iestetre ene Romaine Stevens ............-+. Harrisville. SLIPHUr SPLINE econ RE SEHRISS Gagookeocdones aaonper Lowville. mwiss Creek 2i0 2532. cse8.aee cn ce ERI arrieG OW ym stececitie Seis esos Lowville. rhe Mayhlowers sce hetane cee one ROMAINE SLEVEUS ...- scene ne ae Jerden Falls. BU SULIGUTN Totals eye wich nteucrove.nente ae ehereterera ettsiece Blenry PG inien accel eect so iel=lelol-1-in Turin. Wnion! of Pinckney; i252. s.sosee AR MS Onic nine) cor sao mare aacitesc South Rutland. Walley ‘Dale. 2... besticceeceeemomer Fee SEE TESere ela sie eye's fais cies sense tet Bellwood. Watley. Sprig 2.0 Jac ccnoneestiee Jesh NU Ci OLS ae eaeboooed soe de Lowville. West) Harrisburg, 2h vecterecccas ee Mrs. W. A. Wheeler............ Bellwood. Welsh EFI] Ge the oes cute oe HT BIVanSS elec cis aiscles ei ere te Turin. West Gieyden! 2). Fksincsthes aoe se le OLN ies DLCG AONE Jeteretcres ait laisse West Leyden. LIVINGSTON. AGEHESCE RLV eR to ..nas omens feces Met Be Wearsiis aes sinrecteiiest cise sie Nunda. PERETTI iha olche's wrojeje nals Vatee sce wales NOUN SIG, VOUNS a jem aesis cece Fillmore. WSEBOUU EL cisdite te fe clos crcice oo ce eine CAS Wiheelerttn ce siccsse vice e-le Dalton. UIA ric stecs,a% cuaiehte es cinta ’s.sincrciersle Vote Sey YOUN Eat. eas ote acle Fillmore. Mapison. IDG Reh Aa Oe ee AEA AGOn Ht Sh Sb BAEe Ge Bro wale seca ae ie seree's:¢ Brookfield. IBBAVOT MOTGCK (icc ssccieaiueineie- Jeonoobedn. 1 ON DS VET rh SS BEDE Bo eodememen Unadilla Forks. MRED AMOI).. eles oatasite osths o.012 Abe poe comooeoees Siloam. Solsville Milk Station .......... INOS Opal DE oss Si oe ob oneaand BocO Solsville. Seuth Hamilton . sfysoyes.s cee cna 0s Geo. W. Dickhaut. .72k. 1... = -\. South Hamilton. SRE cetcin te icioie, ope Srefersiey apetslt) os o.cisiele alee Sa Maa VEEN Te Ay elefateieteicistsjs\s/ iro Munnsville. MONG ice,» or.0.070 Mee Wier WALLA) aie cia/Se ol sieiccels e eleis'e sis Whitelaw. MonTGOMERY. PARTING Siarstotaersisiste einai io eel ine oiaiei> =\ne/e oy Ale pbbey IMG erreee . Acte cicitisicieie)sievalerese Ames. Bowmans Creek | ssiccic0 60-520 c0ss Peter MGM Waits. f= clle cise wicis.ois Marshville. Gaylidattaie names cites ccc on a Bye) ge erep SV URING eter aisisihyotaj fein (sien ole sielele Fonda. Doeckstader;, (WH eletes sis soon ee Wims Mockstadersetee. -. (2. cree Palatine Bridge. ilate Cree Kise ce, cers elaelele @ ) clerics \aiei0 Dah daMVVEAMOM atcieeteleletitaisiseleleleiel Flat Creek. GSETVAT yal onesie ele Blase disvcercverayerexs Ch Geta erick ice celssicinieese iso's Stone Arabia. TEIN ER ARNE SBR an son bbescs aoe Chass Via Ay Chlel etc lele =cle soe Hallsville. TURVIEGT ES SAR SR 42.0 ci 6 SOON eS Alolsh ale /Qv ila lteeren SAA “Hyg Aanedorts Lykers. Maple, Groveiinvescenteie ss\a 010 civin ole wie Bravicis olen ERuayiaie cect eels ssi Glen. IMO AWG os, tie eale ates iste ee eee - Daniel Dockstader .:........... Palatine Bridge. INL EU Rhee aetey bia uci 5 Sanaa Te RUACOD Mc NCTIINT 59. ctantecisisisle\e'sinio.s Palatine Bridge. Balatine) Unioniecrest.. ..):.cc00. IE) GRRVOS Haste elev okt titres ire nie afte McKinley. ERGO tig ay ciat ax cKetutale ote ol eh, o30.esctels\ese.e JONN! Bs GOV ke eeicts ses ss as\ain\° Rural Grove. Smithy Creekeaiaseiaictepatereaisic ws! i010 SORT IDR Shrahigers be eso ac denoeaeanad Fort Plain. Stone) Aratay ciicetetsisietrs 20 oc. 26 ew ALDORE, RUbGS metdietns citiateterass ole pis ne .- Stone Arabia. FRY OSE AMU Mes clkie apsioaieele ele ore inys 210 ein sain I Vic Ute a GreNT UTI (catia rerajste sein s/s s/p ivia'eie Tribes Hill. Wa eying n.~ cree eet cleats cies cin) vis nise a oy GrCOs ROSELSUER GH. cichelet bers sin'e einiiele Salt Springville. Wain. etSeniy: set icttcing «> «1066 oe, Dewittivan Deusen... 20.0. Freys Bush. AG) Re polos cb: bE GSHadeeono Hoy JACOB OLLGT rat atete,« atatele ie lore n'els\ninie aie Little Falls. ONEIDA. Al ders Creek: Gace asacey ccuasjsereele.e VAG) MARU RS ORTU As sitesoi hoje ase 4.5 'e.cleielelei uate New York City. PAN GRAS eA shee Meta ates telersieissreas DEIN REE EES ET LOD) 5.5 0.0/0 cle'sseieisieaie Boonville. ANTONI Stay WV AIO Wires cine ocisisiasicie|slele/a TORRONE SICOTTILEs c:o.cje:< sic.c;esiee)sinie Vernon Centre. SACD) oink ioid oct tac hetoe Stele is 86 Nace 6 os INE GUe EAM ESEREI Con |sioikle le vie 50 5:0 c6'00 Camden. 12210 (2) NE OBOeeO doc uc CO uodO noe + ROUBEHEE TBPOS. 610.15 2 i65 o00re oieiciere Rome. Blanchard chteicicoceclere cists base Sele Eee CEMIOIFCRIANG a 57e\o5e)e0\0ie siete sine Vernon. Blue. Brooks <<, .ctmovwdcecntenedae BRA CU. COOMM EN lersradouterecciea's!e < base AVG: Brogdock: . atatess cits celts at asoretatevatete’s Bn ee OAS WESEOBUCK 0:5. 0015 0/08 vo. n.0.0re Blossvale. 30 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE OnEIDA—Concluded. NAME OF FACTORY. Applicant. Post-office. BLOW: cae ccosttterecwedecs ts tosses anna IKADplOnr tk. Mve cee os cere cies Lee Centre. Gastles (Gi cet Wieck Mpevie clas waleretes H. D. Morehouse........::...... Ava. Chriestien, F. N., No. 2......... HON: |Chriestien..%.45%..5/.%t%5 Camden. hristian,: A.. tes snaekiesicciansicis's GO. Ay IB ATCLIES nina cree «sisesinoine Florence. Clinton C. C. & S. Ass’n. .. Geo. B. Havens, President..... Clinton. Sold Springs Wocidi ee cave omseies oe Bs iL. ‘Coon. ss stove elatate ola atstatctciet ee Remsen. WOOT. (ON e stectencestese cae cis BON IC GO vectameste sie ate ss tree tare Lee. EHOPMISh 0... se eernioeeemass cass esls Ti DD SMOrVIst Pee seoes 0% scence es Camden. ASOFNISH 00d ccteeniemeeans cee es Sam SWapplervsts si. sks ssssse ents Lee Centre. Deansville . «faswee datetes ce vesicles Jass Det Kellyeew wecea. .stseseece Deansboro. Deerfield Centre ..........--.-0+- J.P de: Worna held sise ssh « 5's teers South Trenton. Delta erect RSA RN Se eid sie sia due) GF IN. Bathricks, she.cstecc ss ctsa. Delta. Doxstater sitet ccceet snc sete ets S. C. Roueston Higginsville. (MISSING RS rs ceiceisielonisialsisleiel ew solu\sin'e ste BE. D. Franklin Western. Fitch & Bacon Wee Het Golliyis ac ctecticst 02/2 eehaine Verona. PMOV A) HUI oe emiseatecsee e's Roto ic, Watsletlodeoac East Floyd. PLANCIS. Wet icce cclieee Seacis sles nies bala Wrank WWranGisei..< . 23 ss ee ents Remsen. French Road Thos RAIGHCS eee ss tscescees East Steuben. RSH RES B S BS yGD ado GocoocdocceddarG Fred! 'Teuseher’ S2ss2).....%425% North Western. Greens Crossing BATES oeiclalatelclelets Standard: Dairy Cowes: d:.60.5556 Cassville. Greggains, WM.........-.-.ceceee Win Gregeains! 28... 2% ccs. s Glenmore. EVAVIGS) cjorenisitieietoetveretersteresie tin sisinie elec Waan.s Den etenveSorecsteas st seces5 se Hawkinsville. Hennessy, J. F seh elem als ule sino eo Ji os Hennessy: 242%. 55sec one East Florence. ETIES DONO) merianisistecisaictsns’= cisiele seis Merritt Houghton .............. Ford. JACKSON, Geese’ JS Gantner eee shel. sss cessaes Boonville. WROTE. sa ledics cleats PP OL TOMESER tee serele cls: o clels'alerolerel= East Steuben. King, A. S Aa MERTT ESL EN stalls cinie. ois sie aie)s er bie Norwich Corners. Lee Centre Sam Kappler a steciseics «vsc'ss oe ae Lee Centre. G“owell ........ Hy ea EST Leraetatals siete etervte fais eisle isis sisi Lowell. Marcy, Centreast.sn crise see cies .- Manhattan Dairy Co............ New York City. Iie sel Caeannodtasoansoage Bete G. ‘Merry? "i... Pee ue ants 25.43/88 Verona. Miller Branch OU ESTED, 3 'o'alcis alle DOH AMAUNCIMR ae ct ce tots ec ecs se as Camden. New. uondontee nas sc terest cs ese. Jee To (SORTA cteecatescccett New London. NWOrLR! bayiticmecr creme testes ees INS Viet) EVOEIGT stares oleate ot soso he North Bay. No. Bridgewater Milk Station.. aru OO aM AU ere. tots coe allen North Bridgewater. North’ Steuben’ Geecsrcs- ssc nee Ni (He WOTts 3. hs ees tts eae. North Steuben. North Trenton@seccctene nec: .. E. C. Judson Remsen. Oriskany Falls Dairy Co........ W. E. Hilker... Oriskany Falls. Pecks COLmmers accnses secs ss sess ee J.) A: SEROdSe. Sed. cc theo csce sess Waterville. Peoples ....... Sono sdadnnoadadouases VON AMUNTE Sete ss wiih esis «bis cis ss 8 eit Point Rock. Point WROCK Sesteecerecare sete ice ce S. Keppler ...... phothsesasece sae Lee Centre. ‘Oiuaker Hill Peeccmasnacccne sans RS Ge SOMOS stew aicteeles staieiese o10 sits 5:2 Glenmore. Remsen ...... Shoodtodd éadsedodsies DAs Mairchild) js h cccac ccs es Remsen. Ree MA Sy crete cictatinle cisletsisteteieve Robert MCA GAM cr wclcicicies evel cio 0/e Ridge Mills. Sanquoit Creamery Co........... AT We ER OSCOLE: ack ites ccicisleiois oe = Sanquoit. BHECRANT ©. csmiesisiaiele sdadodn angen IWR A Pe AEEEN, SoGobo5adnoudndsS Glenmore. MOUTH ETEN COM ‘icc aicicislaleicielclereioisveres Geo. S. Williams South Trenton. South Western .. RECS he Rarsellenerctascits slo) elec ae Big Brook. SDFINg, Brookes: verb cles veers sc.s W...J- MeCompe..cice2t =... --- Boonville. bar ELM oc / CET UMcGROrieats: 263. scien cececs Lentsville. Huntley .....-- cere ce sere cece cscs HG Brockwave ..aait «22 se5.dee8 Richfield. Hyder ...-.eece ee ceee eee eee ecree EEC Brochkawaiy-cn- okt a2. sss Richfield. ONNSOM) cisjeloiess's)0 cla spsin/e aiowisiels sii ose DiC. Jehmsones. hase «ease ee Burlington Flats. GOTH ela cree ,e siernisicloiaioIniniarel= = Sioiaiei sorele BiG (Peete partes: ode ianis svouteoro sees Mt. Vision. Lentsville ........--eeeee cece renee Hdward Vialbott .sckahec.cds aces Lentsville. Lloydsville .....--+-++++eeseereee Kea Wane eter Ade ce bese wa doe Unadilla Forks. Maple Grove.....-.-+-++++ ce neeeeee Je Fs Gilbertine Cos .2s. 526s. ee Gilbertsville. Middlefield .......-.---eeeeeeecers TT. He O'Connelligs.c8 osisacerane Middlefield. Milford Centre........0-0-.--+02 RG; Beets. tisait siete coc Mt. Vision. TMLOM TIS) oye ce ce isso, oor elaialsinqeintniolo\e s/o. vie nj TBs, ERS Dara ete Noy 5 Met s.coratet ars, osatecretortre Morris. New LisSbOn.......-+-eeeeeeereree Ch Be ROGRSASONSAG ata fecaismen Gilbertsville. IN ee ors cree rate) otegate le cameras ele Beeeeses He IC] BroGk way atasthancnacke oe Richfield. Oaksville .....-.ccjecenscevccesee * JONN) ces RIGen. A. ditotace mechron ee Schuyler Lake. Pashley ....--..-ceseecceeeee secre Gn@s Rashleyieh.i45. sOhcsiecsumese Burlington. Pattem .......ccecsncncecccccecrcs Johny DiRaAMey:. Va. - feemaen seis Hartwick. PPR OGSMIR, oo cle. aio msacedminletsare lois wial sii as ( Campenten. ities cceaenea a South Edmeston. Pierstown Valley....-+.---++++ ooo M. H. Wedderspoon............- Cooperstown. Pleasant Valley.....----+.++++++ Mey CAB OG WAiy. ie is Gisasae cies Richfield. Rider, J. J....-s ee eeeeeeeereeeee TohnigeweVident,... Wee chieas neve Schuyler Lake. Rock Spring...-...-+-s+seeeereecee CHG End Seeks Me oneness East Springfield. ROOTS Fae nce cc ceinnicc minis vise eee eee Ci ES BROOLSHSODS Reo. ceeiseas Ae Gilbertsville. MOSeDOOM) ....-. cine sem tends since J: HS SEAnPESONS: Li is eiamcie oe Cherry Valley. Schuylers Lake.........-.+++++0++ John Iapidenss) weattaecnnacse Schuyler Lake. SRAMTOCK: joie cc = sivey¥elelaitsicisieisiej<)=iale» Cr RRIReersane Ae e saben ese Gilbertsville. South Hartwick.................. CUP. MROOE SHSODS(R ciclc.a sic acee Gilbertsville. South Valley............++++s-++ CUPS RoovstSons!s. he ccoc.snc' Gilbertsville. Sponable, G. A............. se eeee GS AwSnonablet PiBehs. co.cc. Burlington Flats. Sponenburgh, W. H.............- W.. H. Sponenburghs.:......... Fly Creek. Stamley ...cseeseceeeseee ce eereees Ch MEIN Bee. dne heccece keane East Springfield. State Brand No. 1615.......-.... By Wis PUI SBE odtciadte re esis aig Burlington Flats. State Brand No. 1716...........- Ee Wis VW wae vee aiave econ Burlington Flats. State Brand No. 1728............ Ee Wohwirishinn fh. ifs scases.o8 Burlington Flats. Stevens Corners ............+0% 2 'Pheron, Minere bh ke nace once e Garrattsville. FUTON TIN. sis foto ieiedols chaliataetalseet ara siel sus eveia GC. "De PWiheeloe ka. hacks: aniccenem North Winfield. RWI DOL IIAICO tras) « plortchates as pelssie ple Jase, We Dayo iiitndecnceevenns Oneonta. WAU s RED. RG) Ragan cee corondeinc aged A.C. (Brockway: Bros.ct' bacon Sede Richfield. MOE SLLONG i cpuictotclctaintaoiaoucinisisiala sierslelvvars GC, BS McRortewitern id: ssc csaees Westford. IVMASE VANS iaatus stay iacintsts sisleiciatiaae Wim, Ha Bureh esi de.coee wn ce's Westville. SUV TI AM oe ccistt sh « vfs fei chsimesanilyaeie He C.eBrockwayceinsenan -m ac oc Richfield. DYNES hs, SUD ic sa arntande sa oiteioiousis aueae's Lyman. Di sVOuUnR Ey. ctecsmaccccns Warren. RENSSELAER. SPLINS BOOK. c:. cebcen den oc os aode WY eck EOIN otaa le Sie ale: v cxexetacetcire Johnsonville. Sr, LAWRENCE. ISGILOVANLO) iejeereio'e cn sta dietolele «/asels\eie\eiaie iy Ai) SHOREMERS. . ohahe i. chersiaretdtctorstares Edwards. ONG Aer oa eis ore cae Sela tietehlicaaion\sctetciere Branly BiGh els cic c.thisiier craven aerers Bigelow. Cream of the Valley............. A WHO VEraCker i's cnr eieaieve Gouverneur. LOT het (Oy oa 0 ee A. Pt BROWS coh 5 ehh omen aden Fdwards. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 33 Sr. LawrencEe—Concluded. NAME OF FACTORY. Applicant. Post-office. Gouverneur Village Rue Men it OMSK acc ey aighec o'sis aes oe Gouverneur. wenny Creek... oscpensesss eee Eastin, RLIE IG s aoieie = evetel efeyes!eisio sterecs © Pitcairn. PRISsell) Villagevcns ces criss sss ses Jyil Ohe deed 2G REEL AE ROE BOO CREO Russell. South Gouverneur..............+. Renford Stevenson ............. Gouverneur. West Fowler.........-...+.-+-c00 OeiWelbennervcacenccarires fuses Spragueville, ScHOHARIE. MSGLECDLISC mir piiaiteyepracies'sclataise'e C ek PLO DEERCTO Oxtdalaielctesictaraa's Proper. — SENAUT Ot ay-'e arayate ste co nincclein’ate)slo « sivevainiare aly MEI et Abide nee B ange taenee Mt. Vision. : STEUBEN enmmettsy CEECkKsjelescijacse ss aeelslete Vile CEH STAE ISG Se peeteeameT bene Bennetts Creek. SFG COO hen teiisisiucise seams sie tacieaele @hast Mi BULGSULES,. «cies celiac Big Creek. PERE TOLOUMG telctstets eieicrele ce ciniews ecia acters Chas. W. Carpenter............ Borden. eR Did creitice Meter sitlaiateraem «srsroreree 1D EMO EI AS Sscanceeseae capes Purdy Creek. rial! Syrah eenkaddeateeauenoacd CeO Me AGO cesta ctae.s eiels ses Alfred Station. Dryden Ridge......... MPACAOSKOS? cicetccntttelcetes aero ce meticaye Andover. E. Troupsburg JIGS gOS ENIEN 7 sqeavinn yeseeonmeooD Troupsburg. Greenwood Creamery Co........ IVE SHA We neeiorte wrmetis eee este Greenwood. GUOIETES Ganon dersCeOcarGce ss HEBOHOeS 7 ne wis UIENDELEED’ fcc. << -t-10 Andover. ELAS VINLOD sacle cctciaayscisie'cs cla als Pa EERIIOUELODCRES tat. ics atjntare tetra Haskinville. ISIGCEER BUG) oagndibsedioerodassuenn Guisierligihecce, WICKS ing ae Wend onoitelaoon Woodhull. VTE MUD eeietaeis ha cetaneseisiso cic cclectere Sarl MESua vac serr-csyeyeenes © ate Woodhull. LGD heslee vis ce eicciccrdcvaneciceccicesrs Sear (Se MMCStAW. nom cascicches cece Woodhull. ASE tarecpiaie ciciateeimetastadaabecieriee ees Seart! (SMe Sta ye. iace)- stress ce nisiere Woodhull. MEANY a caccistec careers swtepns es stae te ONaAS! ONS (CALPOMCT wyencine cl cs Borden. Monmarehie mere ctmatecea nyse asciaseles Co OHIenry, otic sce orpsc cece tos Purdy Creek. MintdMCTeelks. icteric cemescciose cos Ret © SWE Ze Merny ove aypicreperel oe retcsresays Bradford. PROap Aart ens Water stete: tet iatetetsisier aia alntcTalersieic tale eye IBGrri ara Viner ney coruic srge os cet cleiesr a Andover. INGUISMORGCK a coterie steers nse BE SO LY THO aisle noe arene i steres avers Avoca. ENOUEMERASDOI esse ccteeee wcteslelelserce SearilSweStay scene ccc iste Woodhull. SEATS IO Tey fa(ciate; ele sic) civic larcresstuye oistatstovele Chas. W. Carpenter Elkdale. 1iGy env Appceogedee 1D Js\G AMIE ERS ode anne s00a0de 7 Rexville. Pinter ees e tls ete i. irank: (1) JOWes! eb. va ekl .. Saunders. Spaulding, Hiram Hiram’ Spaulding vrescescc ccc aa Wallace. Re MELOLIOW ac cies oreloimicleterc-oicie sets W.-H. (Cooper jester iaricel t-te. Lila. BIOMED OWELG aiateisielcleisicisls,. bias sn) LPR We eet hn os ee S77 LS eieatts ¢ 1inle 2.65 a Ber ea a, ra Soa, Se 1,156 1 ai See of ale peat: eye a ¢ ies ote ss io Se 1,065 OU hice 5s PS ee ee Sea vee eS AOA tte. 4: Pres Se 1) Ee ed eS COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 3D A few years ago it was discovered by agents of this Depart- ment that cheeses were being sold upon the markets of other States bearing imitations of some of the New York State cheese brands, and that the cheeses were not full-cream and were made in other States. This has injured the reputation of New York State full-cream cheese to a great extent, so much so that the dealers in foreign countries are beginning to request that the placing of the brand upon the cheese be discontinued, as it is no longer a guarantee as to the quality. When it is considered that New York State is essentially a cheese State, we see a great damage that may result to this industry if this counter- feiting is allowed to continue. To show the extent of the cheese industry in this State, permit me to call your attention to the following facts relative to the manufacture of cheese and but- ter for the years 1892, 1894, 1896, 1898 and 1900, respectively: NintoH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE 36 G19‘ 899‘ 9Z1 992 ‘SOP*SOT SPT‘S9L "28 Sas‘09L* SIL O18‘ T66‘08T ‘apeul ssveyo yo spunod jo Jequnu SOU M IT8 ‘S81 ‘68 880‘98s‘ 0s $69‘ 66h‘ 12 929‘81a‘S% L98‘L6P ‘GT ‘opel 1099nq jo spunod jo zoquinu SLO AA PSO‘ 9Sh ‘6% IIL ‘SL0°1% €66‘8SL1‘°SL 865688 6% 619 ‘SPS ‘Ne ‘esooyo pue 1079nq Y0q Supyeur Sof1OJOBJ UT epeur sseoqo jo spunod yo zaquinn T10‘68L°8 £80‘ 269‘F 06L'826'% 6SP'28%'9 SEES ‘SLE‘S ‘eseoyo pue qtejjng 440q Suryeur SeT1ojoey Uy epeut 1a99nq JO spunod yo 1toquInNN 819‘ 20B‘L6 GST ‘GES ‘$8 OST‘98S‘ FL L@L‘0%6‘S8 169° SPP ‘OIL "SO].10}OVJ eseoyo ult epeul oseeyo yo spunod jO JoquinNn 008 ‘FFP ‘08 G00‘ 688° Sz $06‘S0S‘8T LOT‘ 186‘9T 610° P20" PI “*SoT1OJOBI 199jnq Uy epeuUr 1039nqQ jo spunod yo 1aquinn “eseoyo pue 10} -gnq qI0q Supyeur Sop1oJoVy jo aoquinn “£0 esooqo Supy Bur So]L0JOBy yo aAeq Un NT “£0 1097nq Suypyeur SOT10JOBVY jo aoquinn Tete ee tense eee eeeeeeeeeeees nner Fhe enna ee ene e enna ee enee ees QeOT Fete e eee e ee eeeeeere seers ger Peete ee ee eee eee eeeeeer ones BOOT Teese ec eee neeeeeneeeeeseees OnOr “UVGA ‘668 4O NOSVEQ FHL HALIM ONINNIOW ‘Suva NG T, YOu ATIVINNGIG ALVIG HYOX MAN NI SLOOGOU J ASHaH() UNV AALLAG dO NOILVTALIAVOaY COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. ot It will be seen by the above figures that these compilations have been made biennially since 1892, and that for the five years above indicated the amount of cheese manufactured in the aggregate was 566,580,716 pounds; the amount of butter manufactured in the factories in the aggregate dur- ing the same period was 135,915,076 pounds, an average for each year in cheese of 113,316,145 pounds; an average of 26,783,015 pounds of butter. These figures would show that the cheese manufactured in this State is something over four times as much as the butter. The cheese of this State has enjoyed for several years a reputation on the markets of the world second to none. In other words, the New York cheese has been considered the best cheese manufactured in the United States. If this reputation, gained at much ex- pense and great effort, is to be taken away by unscrupulous dealers in other States, then it is useless to continue to strive for purity of products, as the consumption of these goods will be discouraged by the sales of such inferior goods as and for the best. It is to be hoped that the condition will be remedied, and to that end the Hon. James S. Sherman, member of Congress from theTwenty-fifth District of this State, has introduced a bill in Congress known as “The Sherman Branding Dill,” which reads as follows: A bill to prevent a false branding or marking of food and dairy products as to the State or Territory in which they are imade or produced. Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That no person or persons in any State or Territory of the United States, or in the District of Columbia, shall falsely brand or label any dairy or food products which become articles of foreign or interstate commerce or commerce with Indian tribes as to the State or Territory in which they are made, produced or grown, or cause or procure the same to be done by another or others: Provided, That this act shall not apply to or include the branding of wines or liquors. § 2. That if any person or persons violate the provisions of this act, either in person or through another, he shall be guilty 38 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine of not less: than five hundred nor more than two thousand dollars; and that the jurisdiction for the prosecution of said misdemeanor shall be within the district of the United States court in which it is committed. The power exercised by the above act is believed, I am in- formed by good constitutional lawyers, to be fairly within the power of Congress under that provision in the Constitution which provides that that body may regulate commerce between the States. It is therefore hoped that this measure will be- come a law, to the end that this State and others may exercise to the full the inherent right of protecting its reputation for integrity. MILK. During the year the milk has been inspected regularly in the several divisions of the State, under the supervision of the As- sistant Commissioner in charge of each division, as it was being sold or delivered to the consumer. It has also from time to time, as often as conditions would permit, been examined or tested upon being received at the station or platform within the State for delivery to the wholesaler or retailer. As the net result of these many examinations at all the different points in the State, as reported to this office, I feel warranted in saying that the milk supply of the State of New York as a whole, when it reaches the consumer, is in a state of practical purity. We do, however, from time to time find some person handling or selling milk who, either through wilfulness or laches on his own part, is selling adulterated milk. The method of handling such cases is that the agents of this Department who make the ex- aminations and find by the tests applied that the milk is sus- picious, take samples in accordance with the provisions of the statute, viz.: Take duplicate samples in bottles especially pro- vided for the purpose, seal them in the presence of a witness, delivering one to the defendant or person in charge of the milk and the other to our chemist. If upon analysis the milk proves to be adulterated, then the case is referred to the Attorney- General for his action. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 39 Under the provisions of chapter 821, Laws of 1895, during the year we have in this particular branch of the work made and referred to the Attorney-General 416 cases for violation of the milk law, as follows: People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People October 1, 1901. CASE NO. v. Wilkinson ..... 10455, 10456, 10458 10460, 10461, 10462 NON ATRS alos cicccinc(ewiaeiaisiepielaialslni= 10490 Se INVENT EMIIY PS esis) ie 0)* erme ileus 10451, 10453 WGA CSSOLL vslsjnivie/siclejsjrqeinisinesisietste 10478 Ve StangInGer ..cc 8573, 8574 vy. Fotman & Hollenbeck...... 8572 November 12, 1900. Vie SCH AC Hitaiactatas sielenivalscislaiere’sfelse 8209 Vig COV LOlmr stererevelsterelecaisialsipieiutaie! eects 7317 Vi) Giana! Sasicee \ 6 wiaVsibw-e,enlopaisusmseimbe eimjec cre 8805 COIS SV COUSG +o ctae tase ssi pidesete. sess 8806 PICOBIGEV I INEC ELOY. Wo serciars a stares sheds oyaeetate 6520 Peoplery: GlOvd ccccccccccecs wisleiciaje 6s = 6532 April 27, 1901. Beople: vy. Parker tie... ise eae es ck 12001 May 7, 1901. EAI: Vee May ats dceet se ceeeaes eis 10357 May 8, 1901 CODIG Vee UTLOMN soc cies ec sec eeie eens 10363 Heaney. KaAyner sce Jose tht. ee bces 10362 May 9, 1901 IPOOMIGRV AR IUPIta! Neciannc cece recesses cnecee 9596 IEPODIGRY | GOEDET: 1 sta vic so diame .ete sis eieraarcats 9703 EOIN R Ve ELAR Bi wa co cele aigieiacia'sn acho san cate 9713 Peonley.: Neumann) 2% .Ailecis ceases Selde 9715 IPEORlGnV.il OLLOUE. te:sis.co.s0 si5s.eion: sme cree se 9721 IBEODIGAVs WWALEIMANTY \s.o2 soca cecis ec soci 9728 IPPODIC Wor SLLASSED \ o.< 50,2100 sacle cubis ae vets 9740 May 16, 1901 COMO Vee WAN Weis scthece ete aacicecte 10407 May 17, 1901. PEON EnV EENMOLL no. ciciectascicisecoceces 10365 People v. Cummings .................. 10364 May 24, 1901. People v. Randall & Son........ 10814, 10815 People: vi ‘Lrimble. so... 20:<0c.he- 10843, 10844 People v. Ramsdell. .10901, 10902, 10903, 10904 10905 Peaptleny: Goldman i006 3. ccc cnsacde en's 10841 ECODIG Ve INOLEHTUD scneccc osc sc cases 10842 CODIC Wiey EXOLE vein stele clade ote c Welwsjeeled dais 10818 May 25, 1901. People vy. Salmon....... 9244, 9245, 9248, 9247 People v. Hint.......... 9787, 9788, 9789, 9790 June 8, 1901. MCODI Vs ESL tire wo stectsioele co cscdestaate nce 6 5476 June 15, 1901. People: v. Dunham «17.38 ee oe bh ee 4210 People! v.- Mabey: 2.302523 ee AE ae 4218 June 18, 1901. People Vi Quay. sssvscsese = Sc Siecaiatas 10410 June 26, 1907. eople vs ‘Northrup? sosseses. 01 ce See 10926 Beoplery. WOmD welll ocmecn. «ccc hace 10927 People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People June 28, 1901. CASE No. Wer ERUI) stste's vers tin aende Ore ie - 4219 Va Croye Dairy, CO. agen ceils cop cee 4221 June 29, 1901. v. Webb ..... Sa aemtdeteitoe Apoidea Sy’ Vio MOUNS, «wcities hactiseinmotcere ears 30368 July 11, 1901 Vo RYANS +. csciesk sso ctee ae eee - 10371 July 12, 1901 Wise CRATE es cine OPO OO BOB Ie. 10068 Vu, Baker). scares dacct 10061, 10062 v. Dent & Anderson..... 10063, 10064 Vie COFIGIO, Sos nooeeeosaaad: 10065, 10066 Wi Bnders( 7,7 tA8Ssedetatscocd 10069 v. Bundy & Sutherland ....... 10070 July 19, 1901. Wit WANCBATIAPASG. c casaarnees cece 4220 Vice VBC Ts ede w inno seme 9726, 9738 We WML S a rrtivierarsiececreaters Jelocietin - 10694 V-9Steinmiller: trsissas deca seas - 9736 Ve WISE? cases sic taneeeeth es . 10654 We, Cweillra) iso ptctsomctneeeek date - 10658 Wa Welisenall: . 2) woscr te asec 10661 V.. GOFManl! |.23,c500 kee cade 10663 Vig uandsman a aaseteeee eae 10677 Ww. Neumann’ 5 52. Jgccqcees ohece 10673 Ws Hofinian tq se eestor 10684 July 30, 1901. Ve BatCHOUSe ate «arses 5480, 5481, 5482 We ONG, saosin eens deeetes 4222 War MURNON 5s :ac os avstcincmes aioe mercer 10414 August 8, 1901. v. Robinson & Hawkins........ 8712 We EVUISGHy prs neh ak cntscicttis «ataeus 8762 WotR EL GUS ar avascicva catetettrers orofeiassa eee 8714 Wel MAY St tsccceceaecseseeeons ucas 8773 Vis, GOW G) eG :c,aectointictyojanisecancrctens 8743 Ve nugar oat (Conc. acess sence 8728 v. Mutual Milk & Cream Co... 873 Wo SCHMIGE, ws.c. cccmencoseticecrs 8739 v. Standard Dairy Co.......... 8684 vy. Mutual Milk & Cream Co... 8730 AVERIM an <. 5/0 sae cites caters Seka 8770 aadadn44Ah4444454 Wecht: io. ceemuteen sentence 8727 McDermott Bunger Co..... . 8686 Bierson.<.diswnomedse ences 8748 Biter. Soeiee ccceet Maree eae 8744 Warwick Valley Milk Assn. 8705 Schneider? sees ssoeee ween 8720 Mutual Milk & Cream Co... 8738 PATCH parc. cig encontraron se kote Peicpa 8741 SRONECLIEE 1 ble nlere lar clssSerain vie see hieie ote 8734 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE 42 CASE No. People v. Mutual Milk Co.............. 8715 People v. Benderoth .............eeeee- 8761 People vs, WuUnG rcs. aneesctas G4 dada 8680 IPEGPIe) We LMLULOS: cone /ccieinienie/ais eiatatetatieisrcins 8742 People v. Mutual Milk & Cream Co... 8768 People v. Sugar Loaf Dairy Co........ 8733 R August 5, 1901. Peaple vy. LODE Arrerieciee ticipchteser cele (0 11025 People Vv. Mein Sin eer Kyareies clsisielsis/aicisiaeiels 10930 People VV. COnkiinty, cic totes sce cecis cis 10934 People. v. «TEAMErsons bs o..40ctileetine sat o/s 10936 People v. Sheil Brothers ............. 10939 Peoplerye tBailey: eandsanek ct eaerecten ns tie 10940 Peoplesye Steele | aiisdscecteccieser esate 10947 Peoplev: «Campbell, «s2.cs0cteeeetias «seo 10951 Peoplescv., Prennerhss Jes. eset tek» ober 11003 BeoOple VW, BEWTENAE nie ccicieiaiseicie vw .ee cree 11005 People sy. ENillipsing cteictchre cspreleiciete rs slain» 11014 People v. McGuire. .11028, 11029, 11031, 11032 11040, 11041, 11042, 11044 August 7, 1901. People.v., Barthorf:.cissac. PS. 9987, 9986 Peopler vs, eWisS.ecsiess soceeeee ese ether 9998 Fooplec. Moores 2:.):.%:. deme cee. 9990, 9988 Peoplevy.. Andrus 2583: eF oo te 10000 Pegplerv.: Milligan «2h /Mises Hoste none 9999 PeoplecvisOwens Ui wss eee eae seek 10779 August 8, 1901. People v. Willimieer ...... sie ivertate c(eiets 8990 Peopletv. Nelbach® (ccssclisccsnse cases ce 10685 People v. Henschke .............00 ... 10764 eopleyv. KOCHICr ciiecn ewrace ss sctecmeens SSLS Peaplely: (MOrrissey ta.ge se csecewws aenans (518 Peoplei-v. FHErmann | s..-. cscs a swercens 6519 PP EODIEUVsr Ee CCUTLG. srclene.cseninaiin este arere ee 6541 Heople v. Hatch ....s.eccs- Bite: writers O)avslecs 6545 PEGDICMV AG OLAMUON voscicclcieeaceinsece mete 6512 POPS Wve ATCON yeejs sie ne rie lateractaare a ciate 6542 People’y. R0aTback ccasses.«wsteleeee atte 10887 Ve GeTiOn scent ee0.0s.c Rene Csctren 11303 We ESEULOT oc 2, 0.0/010,0, v's, nessa mane 10786 Vv. Woodward, .c:crstennetees 11302 showing is very gratifying to us and indicates there were fewer people last year who were either negligent or wilful viola- COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 43 tors of the statute, and that they are paying more respect to it as time goes on. The milk question is one of great concern to everybody, as nearly everybody is a purchaser or consumer of the same. One of the particular methods of adulterating milk has been, dur- ing the extreme warm months to add to it preservaline. Some of these preservalines are made from formaldehyde, a chemical substance that is said to be poisonous and may be injurious even in small quantities to the human system. Many apparently well meaning milkmen and men with rep- utations for integrity have used it under representations made to them that its use was not only harmless, but ben- eficial. The following fallacious argument has been used, viz: That it could not harm any commodity to put something into it that simply preserved it in its original state; that everybody preserved fruit so as to have it as near as possible in its original state at the time of the year when it could not be grown. This argument has convinced a great many and they have used the commodity only to find themselves in trouble thereafter for using it. I am informed by those competent to speak upon the subject that the preservaline hinders, if it does not stop, that decomposition which is necessary to rapid and complete diges- tion. The fact that these statements and arguments have been used as they have been to many of the dealers accounts for many of the violations of the milk law which have been reported to the Attorney-General. At the present time some of the cities of the State are seriously considering the effect upon the human system of milk containing too many bacteria of a given kind. This question is not only an intensely interesting one, but a very complicated one. It might well be termed, “ A small question on a large scale.” It is with much difficulty that we can procure assistance that is competent to pass upon this ques- tion, but in view of the fact it is the coming question and one that is being strongly agitated in some of the cities in the State of New York of milk containing more than a given number of bacteria to the cubic centimeter, I have been doing what I could 44 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE with the assistance I] was able to procure to determine what, if anything, could be done to assist those in producing milk, to the end that they might send it to the city with as few bacteria of a dangerous character as possible in it. I have consulted with Prof. V. A. Moore of Cornell University, who is eminently qualified, having made it a life study. He has prepared a re- port relative to this question, and from that report I am of the opinion that the danger from this source is not nearly so great as the people have been led to. believe. However, the facts as found by Professor Moore have been placed at your disposal (see Eighth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Agriculture), and if in your wisdom it is deemed best to place at the disposal of this Department the necessary means or equipments with which to enter further into this subject, it would probably prove a benefit not only to the milk producing portion of our people but to the consuming public. By chapter 155, Laws of 1898, your honorable body provided that no milk cans in which milk had been conveyed to city or town should be returned in a filthy condition or containing any garbage or deleterious milk, but in making this provision it also “provides it should not apply to cities of the first class. It is now conceded that this is one of the great sources of food for bacteria, and that great quantities of it exist in cans that are returned from cities of the first class, i. e., New York and Buf- falo. By virtue of that provision this Department is unable to do anything whatever relative to the cans returned to the pro- ducer from the above-named cities. It is a fact well known to all persons who see such cans that many of them are returned reeking with foul odors from garbage of different kinds de- posited therein by some one in the city before returning them. That this garbage is a great source of food for bacteria of all kinds, and more particularly harmful bacteria, cannot be de- nied. This act, in my judgment, should be amended to the end that the law should be applied to all portions of the State with- out exception. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 45 The amount of milk received in the city of New York during the years 1888 to 1901, inclusive, is as follows: toe amet cans SIERO Sn Aa AC 6,062,216 “121309: ARDS ES Na cn SR ran 6,630,278 a aes 8,141,983 eae, Satins Re To Anes La Oe 8,269,953 SE «SAR AA Gel AANA eS lh le 9,084,781 Tey Sy ERPS to oR ap eS 9,303,315 {BOE ARRON GALOIS Selah et ANA OE 9,485,018 Maoaid ota Mt MIAW Vo des oly. Satins 3 9,336,827 SLEDS Ste alae tine Ay rt atta cas io aA ata 10,079,417 LUSH Tad Seta tacemteai ine 2th, AO it el pepe ae 10,338,356 1898 )e1: aks BAL ad ko, -ndetnteodg- od3- Se ap 12,382,106 GOS Sei ae Oren Talay 4 Horde ah 13,121,655 ee ene ENS! DIM 13,504,610 < POISE pie iaettedalt ie kbs e-ticket Mad 14,005,007 CONDENSED MILK. During the year agents of this Department have found several firms in the State that were selling condensed milk in cans her- metically sealed and that were not labeled or branded as re- quired by the statute. In these instances cases were made and referred to the Attorney-General for prosecution as follows: August 20, 1901. People v. O’Dell. People v. Jurgens, No. 100. People v. Scranton Dairy Co. People v. Nestle. People v. Wood & Sellick. People v. Smith & Sills. September 80, 1901. August 25, 1901. People v. Fuller & Jones. People vy. Strait Bros. People v. Huron Condensed Milk Co. People v. Leggett & Co. Reptenmters 2, 290%: People v. Vermont Milk Co. People v. Elliott. These violations have not been numerous, but illustrate the fact that all the avenues require watching in order to avoid violations. On the whole the law is observed by producers of this class of goods. These manufacturers in particular are to be commended for the cleanliness and good sanitary condition 46 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE around their plants, and the great care with which all the cattle and their surroundings are observed by those producing milk for these plants. The work done by these people is in a great degree educational to the milk producing public and is propor- tionately beneficial to the milk consumer. PRESERVALINE. Your honorable body provided by chapter 534, Laws of 1900, as follows: No person shall sell, offer or expose for sale, any butter or other dairy products containing a preservative, but this shall not be construed to prohibit the use of salt in butter or cheese, or spirituous liquors in club or other fancy cheese or sugar in con- densed milk. No person or persons, firm, association or cor- poration shall induce or attempt to induce any person or per- sons to violate any of the provisions of the agricultural law. Any person, firm, association or corporation selling, offering or advertising for sale any substance, preparation or matter for use in violation of the provisions of the agricultural law shall be guilty of a violation of this act. Under the provisions of this statute I have endeavored to stop all persons in the State of New York from advertising or selling preservaline for the preservation of dairy products. In the case of the People v. Biesecker, the question of the constitutionality of the said law was raised, the attorney for the defense contending that the said law was unconstitutional because it sought to prevent the sale of all preservatives and was not confined to the prohibition against preservatives that were deleterious to health. The court held with the defense in this, basing its views mainly upon the proposition that pre- servatives were to preserve and not to destroy, and it was plainly beyond the constitutional power of the Legislature to pass a law that prevents a man from preserving or caring for his property. This case was appealed, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court sustaining the decision of the lower court. From this decision an appeal was takerf to the Court of Appeals. The following are the briefs and points for the People on appeal: COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 47 COURT OF APPEALS—STATE OF NEW YORK. Tun ProPpLe OF THD StaTH or New York, Plaintiff-Appellant, against JoHN S. BreseckErR, Defendant-Respondent. STATEMENT OF Facts. This action was begun by the Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of New York, for the violation by the defendant of section 27 of chapter 338 of the General Laws passed in 1893 and known as the Agricultural Law, as amended by chapter 534 of the Laws of 1900. Authority to bring the action is given by section 8, and the penalty sought to be collected is one hundred dollars ($106) imposed by section 37 of the law. Section 27 as amended in 1900, prohibits the adulteration of dairy products with animal fats or oils and the manufacture of any oleaginous substance with intent to sell the same as butter or cheese; no person shall solicit orders for the sale of the same, nor sell any such product or substance as a product of the dairy; no person shall coat, powder or color butterine or oleomargarine with annatto, by means of which such oleomargarine shall be made to resemble the product of the dairy; no person shall make, sell, or have for sale, butter that is produced by taking original stock, melting the same and mixing the resultant butter fat with skimmed milk and producing what is commonly called process butter, unless he shall plainly mark it as “ renovated butter,” and the tub containing such shall have the top and 5 ’ sides marked “ renovated butter,” with letters at least one inch in length. This action was brought for the violation of the remainder of the section which reads as follows: “No person shall sell, offer or expose for sale, any butter or other dairy product containing a preservative, but this shall not be construed to prohibit the use of salt in butter or cheese, or spirituous liquors in club or other fancy cheese or sugar in condensed milk. No person or persons, firm, association or cor- poration shall induce or attempt to induce any person or persons to violate any of the provisions of the Agricultural Law. Any person, firm, association or corporation selling, offering or e) 4s NintoH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE . advertising for sale any substance, preparation or matter for use in violation of the provisions of the Agricultural Law, shall be guilty of a violation of this act.” The amendment of 1900 became a law in April of that year. In July 1900, the plaintiff served the defendant with the sum- mons and complaint in this action which alleged: “That for some time prior to June 27th, 1900, and on the 27th day of June, 1900, at his store, No. 59 Murray street, borough of Manhattan, city of New York, the defendant did offer for sale, did advertise for sale and did sell a substance, preparation or matter called preservaline, which was declared by him to be, and advertised by him to be put into, mixed with and made a part of dairy products and be a preservative of butter or other dairy products. That said substance, preparation or matter called preservaline is a preservative, and is not salt to be put into butter or cheese and is not spirituous liquors to be put into club or other fancy cheese, and is not sugar to be put into condensed milk. “That the defendant offered for sale, advertised for sale and did sell the said substance, preparation or matter with the intent and recommendation that the purchaser should manufacture it, mix or compound it with or add it to natural milk or cream and other dairy products, and then sell the said dairy products con- taining the said preservative. That said advertisement, offer of sale and sale of said substance, preparation or matter by the defendant was advertised and sold for use in violation of the provisions of the Agricultural Law, and contrary to section 27 of chapter 338, of the Laws of 1893, as amended by section 1 of chapter 149, of the Laws of 1899, as amended by chapter 534 of the laws of 1900.” The defendant admitted that he advertised for sale, offered for sale, and sold a substance to be put into and mixed with dairy products, and such substance he advertised to be a “ pre- servative,’ but he demurred that he was thereby breaking the law of the land, and alleged the statute of 1900—that no per- son shall sell, offer or expose for sale, any butter or other dairy COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 49 product containing a preservative—to be unconstitutional and therefore void. The issues of law thus raised by the demurrer were brought on for argument before Justice Bischoff at the October Special Term of the Supreme Court in New York county and that court sustained the demurrer. Judgment dismissing the complaint was entered December 11, 1900. Plaintiff appealed to the Ap- pellate Division of the Supreme Court for the First Department, on December 22, 1900. Said appeal came on for argument on March 8, 1901, and an order of said court affirming the judg- ment at Sperial Term was filed April 16, 1901. Final judgment was entered on the order of the Appellate Division on April 18, 1901, from which judgment an appeal to this court was taken May 7, 1901. On October 1, 1901, an order was made by this court placing the appeal upon the present calendar and stipula- tion was filed by the parties hereto fixing the date of the argu- ment for October 29, 1901. POUNT .f. THE PROHIBITION AGAINST THE SALE OF Dairy PRopucts Con- TAINING A PRESPRVATIVE IS CONSTITUTIONAL IF ENACTHD TO Protect THE PusBLIC HEALTH OR TO PREVENT FRAUD. The defendant advertised for sale a substance known as “ preservaline,” which he said was a “ preservative,” to be mixed with and put into milk, and by inducing persons to purchase this substance and mix it with milk he became a violator. The contention of defendant is, that the prohibition against selling a dairy product containing a “ preservative ” is in restraint of liberty, and is the taking of property without due process of law, and that he cannot be held liable for inducing anyone to violate an unconstitutional law. “This court has frequently defined liberty in its broad sense as understood in this country to mean, the right, not only of freedom from actual servitude, imprisonment or restraint, but the right of one to use his faculties in all lawful ways, to live and work where he will, to earn his livelihood in any lawful 4 50 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE calling, and to pursue any lawful trade or avocation. It has been declared to be one of the fundamental rights and priy- ileges of every American citizen, to adopt and follow such law- ful industrial pursuits not injurious to the community as to him may seem fit.”—Matter of Jacobs, 98 N. Y., 98; People v. Marz, 99 N. Y., 877; People v. Gillson, 109 N. Y., 389; People v. Tyroler, 157 NY 116: The plaintiff grants and admits that this statute interferes with the business of this defendant and restrains him from un- limited license to sell or advertise the product of his business for mixture with dairy products. But restraint of person and property is allowed to the legisla- ture if the restraint is exercised for the peace, safety, or general welfare of the public. Such restraint is called the police power of the legislature. “We may own our property absolutely and yet it is subject to the proper exercise of the police power.”—Health Department v. Rector, 145 N. Y., 32. The question before this court is whether the legislature was acting within the police power vested in it when it passed the provision: “No person shall sell, offer or expose for sale any butter or other dairy product containing a preservative, but this shall not be construed to prohibit the use of salt in butter or cheese, or spirituous liquors in club or other fancy cheese or sugar in condensed milk.” The police power has not yet been fully described or its extent plainly limited. It has been often remarked that it is difficult and impossible to define its limits. One definition called it co- extensive with self-protection, and the operation by society of the natural law of self-preservation. It has not inaptly been called the law of paramount necessity. “It is incapable of exact definition, but its existence is essential to every well ordered government.” People v. King, 110 N. Y., 423. “Tt is an undoubted rule that it may be exerted to protect COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 5 the public health, or prevent a fraud upon the people.”—People v. Girard, 145 N. Y., 105. “Tf the act prohibited is fraudulent there can be no doubt that the legislature under its police powers may provide for its punishment.” “A regulation which is instituted for the purpose of prevent- ing fraud or injury to the public, and which tends to furnish. such protection is clearly constitutional.’—Parker, Ch. J., in People ex rel. Tryoler v. Warden, 157 N. Y., at page 123. “In short, the police power covers a wide range of particular unexpressed powers reserved to the state affecting freedom of action, personal conduct and the use and control of property.” “Tt may be used in restraint of liberty whenever necessary to secure the peace, good order, health, morals and general wel- fare of the community. And the propriety of its exercise within constitutional limits is purely a matter of legislative discretion with which the courts cannot interfere.”—People v. King (supra). “The court will not be prevented from looking at the true character of the act as developed by its provisions by any state- ment in act itself or its title showing that it was ostensibly passed for some object within the police power.”—Health De- pariment v. Rector, 145 N. Y., 32. “JIn other words, its (the Legislature’s) determination as to what is a proper exercise of the police power is not final or con- clusive, but is subject to the supervision of the courts.”—Oolon v. Lisk, 153° N. Y., 196: “The courts have not been able or willing definitely to cir- cumscribe it, and each case must be decided very largely on its own facts. “The difference between what is and what is not reasonable frequently constitutes the dividing line between a valid and void enactment by the Legislature in the exercise of its police power.” Dissenting opinion, Bartlett, J., Health Department v. Rector, 145 N. Y., 42. “If courts are able to say upon a perusal of the statute that there is some fair and reasonable connection between the stat- 52 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ute and the protection of the public health and prevention of fraud, the statute will be sustained.”—WMatter of Jacobs, 98 N. Y., 98; People ex rel. Tyroler v. Warden, 157 N. Y., 116; People v. Gillson, 109 N. Y., 389. This court jealously guards the right to scrutinize every de- cision of the Legislature as to what is or is not a valid exercise of the police power. The plaintiff must show to this court a reasonable connection between the statute and the protection of the public health or the prevention of fraud. POINT IL. THE PROHIBITION AGAINST THE SALE OF Datry PrRopbucts Con- TAINING A PRESERVATIVE IS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PuBLic HEALTH. 1. The statute expressly states this object: Section 36 of the Agricultural Law expressly declares each section of the law to be enacted to prevent deception “and to preserving the public health, which is injured by the manufac- ture, sale and use of the articles or substances herein regulated or maintained.” 2. The history, context and subject matter of section 27 show this object: Section 27 as a general law was passed in 1893 and reads as follows: ‘“No person shall manufacture, mix or compound with or add to natural milk, cream or butter any animal fats or animal or vegetable oils, nor make or manufacture any oleaginous sub- stance not produced from milk or cream, with intent to sell the same as butter or cheese made from unadulterated milk or cream or have the same in his possession with such intent; nor shall any person solicit or take orders for the same or offer the same for sale, nor shall any such article or substance or com- pound so made or produced, be sold as and for butter or cheese the product of the dairy. No person shall coat, powder or color with annatto or any coloring matter whatever, butterine or oleomargarine or any compound of the same or any product or manufacture made in whole or in part from animal fats or animal or vegetable oils not produced from unadulterated milk or cream by means of which such product, manufacture or com- > COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 53 pound shall resemble butter or cheese, the product of the dairy; nor shall he have the same in his possession with intent to sell the same nor shall he sell or offer to sell the same.” The kinds of adulterations prohibited were: animal fats, mak- ing oleomargarine to sell as butter and coloring the same so as to imitate butter. The offenders were, the manufacturer; the jobber or man who took orders; the man who had in possession for sale and the man who sold. The first amendment to this section was made by chapter 149 of the Laws of 1899, and consisted of the addition to the sec- tion of the following: “No person by himself, his agents or employees, shall manu- facture, sell, offer or expose for sale, butter that is produced by taking original packing stock or other butter or both and melting the same, so that the butter fat can be drawn off, then mixing the said butter fat with skimmed milk or milk or cream or other milk product and rechurning the said mixture, or that is produced by any similar process and is commonly known as boiled or process butter, unless he shall plainly brand or mark the package or tub or wrapper in which the same is put up in a conspicuous place with the words, ‘ Renovated butter. If the same shall be put up, sold, offered or exposed for sale in prints or rolls, then the said prints or rolls shall be labeled plainly with printed letters in a conspicuous place on the wrapper with the words ‘ Renovated butter.’ If the same is packed in tubs or boxes or pails or other kind of a case or package the words ‘Renovated butter’ shall be printed on the top and side of the Same in letters, at least, one inch in length, so as to be plainly seen by the purchaser. If such butter is exposed for sale, uncovered, not in a package or case, a placard containing the label so printed shall be attached to the mass of butter in such manner as to easily be seen and read by the purchaser. No person shall sell, offer or expose for sale, any butter or other dairy product containing a preservative, but this shall not be construed to prohibit the use of salt in butter or cheese, or spirituous liquors in club or other fancy cheese or sugar in con- densed milk.” The original section would seem to have reached all kinds of adulteration; but evidently there were offenders who were shrewdly avoiding the effect of section 27 by taking oils or fats directly from old butter and making “ renovated butter.” Or Ld Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Another class of offenders were putting into and mixing with dairy products a foreign substance which they called a “ pre- servative,”’ and to reach this class the sentence was added, “ no person shall sell, offer or expose for sale any butter or other dairy product containing a preservative.” Nowhere in the Agricultural Law was there anything to punish the man who induced another to do the mixing of a foreign substance with a dairy product; nor to punish the per- son or firm who offered to sell and advertised for sale, fats and animal or vegetable oils; the various coloring matters to make substances resemble butter, or to make white vinegar resemble in color the pure cider vinegar, or who sold the instruments or chemicals, substances or compounds with which the Agricul- tural Law could be violated. | This was the evil that brought about the last amendment of section 27 and the enactment of chapter 534 of the Laws of 1900. It caught the defendant in the meshes of the law and caused him to raise a great hue and cry about abuse of liberty and the Constitution. The act reads as follows: “ No person or persons, firm, association or corporation shall induce or attempt to induce any person or persons to violate any of the provisions of the Agricultural Law. Any person, firm, association or corporation selling, offering or advertising for sale any substance, preparation or matter for use in violation of the provisions of the Agricultural Law shall be guilty of a violation of this act.” The entire Agricultural Law has running through it the mani- fest intention of the Legislature to protect the food supplies of the people. It regulates the standard for milk; the kinds of food to be fed to the cows; fixes times when milk from cows cannot be sold; fixes a standard for the purity of vinegar; pro- hibits the sale of bobbed veal and protects butter and cheese from the sale of imitations as butter and cheese. Section 27, containing the enactment under review, is set in and is sur- rounded by and made a part of all this legislation. Surely the Legislature was giving its attention to the public health and COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 55 was not thinking of this defendant nor the destruction of his business. Nor was it thinking, as in the case of People v. Marz, 99 N. Y., 377, and in re Jacobs, 98 N. Y., 98, of upholding some special industry or class. 3. Any dairy product containing a preservative is harmful to the public health: If a preservative in a darry product is harmful, even the de- fendant will not deny the power of the Legislature to prohibit its use. The court must not be deceived by the definition of the word into believing that the substance itself, because called by that name, must be harmless. The positive charge is here made and plaintiff could have proven it on trial, that any chemical preservative introduced into and mixed with a dairy product is harmful just because it does preserve. Plaintiff could also have shown that most, if not all, the so-called preservatives have as their main element the chemical called formaldehyde, which is the chief element in the embalming liquors used by undertakers, and which is generally used by photographers to coat their plates with a hard gelatinous surface. In re Jacobs this court took judicial notice of the public demand for tobacco, of its nature and its quality. Plaintiff urges that the court now take judicial notice of the fact that dairy products are of a perishable nature tending to fermenta- tion and decay; that digestion and assimilation of dairy prod- ucts in the human body is nothing more or less than hastened fermentation and decay; that any substance introduced into dairy products and mixed with them, which tends to hold to- gether its elements and molecules so as to defeat the natural progress to fermentation and decay would continue to have the same effect when that dairy product had passed into the human stomach. It could not be a preservative unless it resisted the tendency of the food toward decay; this same resistance would be made against the fermentation and digestion of the food in the human stomach. The Legislature examined into the various so-called preserva- tives, as must be evident from the exceptions which it makes 56 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE of salt in butter or cheese, or spirituous liquors in club or other fancy cheese or sugar in condensed milk. That there are ex- ceptions mentioned indicate that the questions of harmlessness or harmfulness was considered by the Legislature. There was the forum in which this defendant should have urged the harm- less character of preservaline. The Legislature determined that some preservatives at least were harmful. Defendant doubtless will loudly take issue with the state- ment that all “ preservatives ” are harmful, and will urge on the contrary that his preservaline is as harmless as the best milk from a Jersey dairy. That is one of the marvelous dis- coveries of science of this age. He surely will not urge that all “ preservatives ” selling on the market are harmless. In competition with his rivals in the market place we know that he vouches only for his own product. We know also that his competitors return his compliment and vouch only for the harm- lessness of their product. There can be no doubt that at least some “ preservatives ” are harmful. 4. In protecting the public health from some harmful pre- servatives the Legislature may prohibit the sale of all preserva- tives in the exercise of its discretion. The plaintiff alleges that all preservatives are harmful. The defendant insists that all or at least some are harmless. This court cannot take to itself, nor does it want to do so, the duty of determining when any prohibited article is harmful or harm- less. This court can, however, take judicial notice of the effect of chemicals in food to decide that some chemicals inserted in food which would preserve the food and thereby become en- titled to the name “ preservative ” are in fact harmful to diges- tion and to the public health. The word “preserve” and the noun “preservative” does mean harmlessness as applied to preservation of iron by paint from rust, but when the word “preservative ” is applied to a chemical reaction in food it does not follow that the food thereby is not injured as food by reason of the very reaction which has been necessary to pre- serve it. CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 57 The defendant protests that the Legislature has put a ban on what he would call a harmless preservative as well as on the harmful. He would have the statute limited so as to read: “No person shall sell any dairy product containing a harm- ful preservative.” Any such enactment would cover this State with all kinds of food adulterants christened by their makers “ harmless pre- servatives.” The State would be obliged to pursue every one through all of the courts clear up to this forum before any one of the adulterants would give up the fight and retire from the traffic in the public health. Such an act would be a public announcement to every chemical manufacturer: “ Come to New York and adulterate dairy products and take your chances in getting a jury to call you a harmless preservative.” Even though the “ preservative”? might be held to be most harmful he would be doing business for a year behind the law’s delays at a profit of such size as to make the expense of litigation very worth while. If the question of harm or not-harm is not to be left to this court, but is to be left to a jury there would be one decision in Buffalo and another in New York city. The entire State would be divided into a camp of juries, a camp of is-it- harmful and a camp of is-it-not-harmful. Under one Appellate Division a preservative would be harmless and sold with im- punity, under another it would be harmful and barred from sale. The State simply could not collect evidence and otherwise cope with the army of adulterants. Like a horde of locusts their very numbers would overwhelm opposition. This situa- tion would result just because defendant thinks it better that ninety-nine guilty adulterants should escape rather than that the liberty of one innocent adulterant should be violated. In matters of the food of the general public, is it not public policy, is it not legislation for the good of the whole, even at the sufferance of a few, is it not a valid exercise of the police power, that one harmful adulterant—“ preservaline,” if defend- ant pleases—should suffer in his liberty of manufacture and sale 58 NIntH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE rather than that ninety-nine guilty harmful adulterants should escape the law and damage the public health. Does this not come within Colon y. List, 153 N. Y., 188, where the court said: “The interests of the public generally and not a particular class must require it.” In People v. Cipperly, Judge Learned said: “Where there is a general right on the part of the public and a general duty on the part of the land-owner or any other person to respect such right we think it is competent for the Legislature by a specific enactment to prescribe a rule for de- claring, establishing and securing such right.” Is not the Legislature a forum where the citizen can go at any time and get recognition for his harmless preservative? Is it not the business of the Legislature to determine the people’s needs and their dangers? 5. A similar statute has already been declared for the public health so far as it relates to one dairy product. The case of the People v. Cipperly, 37 Hun, 324, settled the rule of law for this case as to milk. The opinion was written by Judge Landon. Judge Learned, P. J., wrote the dissenting opinion, and the Court of Appeals in 101 N. Y., 634, said: “For reasons sufficiently stated by Judge Learned, who has. dissented in the General Term, the judgment should be re- versed.” Section 138 of the Law of 1883 was incorporated as section 20 in the Agricultural Law in 1893, and it provided: “The term adulterated milk when so used means milk con- taining more than eighty-eight per cent. of water or fluids and milk containing less than twelve per cent. milk solids.” The evidence in the case showed that the milk in question had been drawn from healthy cows and in its natural state fell below the standard. It was asserted that the milk was in fact a wholesome prod- uct and the decision of the General Term, which was reversed, was the same argument as defendant is here using, viz., that the Legislature was beyond the police powers and was not protect- CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 59 ing the public health in prohibiting the sale of wholesome milk. In that case there was no foreign substance in the dairy prod- uct, it simply fell below the arbitrary standard. The dissenting opinion, which was made the opinion of this court, says: “ How is unwholesomeness to be determined. The court can- not take judicial notice whether milk below a standard is or is not unwholesome. Is it for the jury? If so the court must charge the jury in each case that if they find milk below that standard to be unwholesome, then the statute is constitutional; if they find it to be wholesome, then the statute is unconstitutional. A constitutional question cannot be settled or rather unsettled in that way. It would vary with the varying judgment of juries.” “Tf the Legislature may fix a standard, they must judge whether or not milk below that standard is wholesome. The courts cannot review that judgment.” “It cannot even be material to the present question whether milk below the standard fixed by the State is or is not whole- some, the question is whether the Legislature can establish a standard of purity.” Section 18 of the old law being section 20 of the Law of 18938, continued in its definitions of what the term adulterated milk means down to and inclusive of the following subdivision: “Milk which has been diluted with water or any other fluid or to which has been added or into which has been introduced any foreign substance whatever.” Of this section and of this subdivision this court said in that case: “The examination of the present law clearly shows that it relates to and is appropriate to promote the public health. Whether its details are wise we do not know, but its object is evident and is good.” “There is nothing in the present law which has any other result in view than the public health. No large manufacturers are to be protected against the competition of a single work- man. No other intention can be gathered from the law, plainly none other existed and in view of the difficulties which surround 60 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THD the attempt to secure wholesome milk to the people, it is by no means certain that the establishment of a definite standard is not a judicious provision.” This court has said all this regarding one dairy product, how can it now say that the Legislature when it seeks to prohibit the sale of all other dairy products as dairy products “ into which has been introduced any foreign substance whatever ” is acting from a different motive. The portion of section 27 referring to “renovated butter,” prohibits the sale of a butter which apparently on the surface of the statute is far more conclusively harmless than the so- called “ preservative.” It will not be contended that the Legis- lature has not the power to insist that such “ renovated butter ” shall be marked by its true name “ renovated butter ” and shall not be sold as the real thing. Yet in fact it is real butter. It has had no foreign substance added to it; it has simply been worked over; it is a second-hand product. This process is a sort of preservative process by mechanical means. It treats butter after it has become old or decayed. If the prohibition against the insertion into butter of a chemical whether called “preservative,” “restorer,” “renewer,” or whatever the name, is unconstitutional, how much more is the statute restraining the business of the renovator unconstitutional. His product ought to be entitled to sale, because the elements he uses are solely nature’s elements? The statute in this case prohibits the sale of butter containing a foreign substance introduced to delay its fermentation and to make it less digestible, and the statute simply says that such dairy product shall not be adver- tised and sold as the pure article. Does the line of difference between the legislation for the pub- lic health and of legislation beyond the police power lie some- where between milk and other dairy products? In the language of Judge Finch of this court, “ Let us play no tricks with food, let us have no experimentation.” COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 61 POUT OI. Tur PROHIBITION OF THE SALE OF A Datry PropucT CONTAINING A PRESERVATIVE WAS ENACTED TO PREVENT DECEPTION. 1. The statute expressly states this object: Section 36 of the Agricultural Law says: “This article and each section thereof are declared to be enacted to prevent deception in the sale of dairy products.” Article 2 includes both section 27 and section 36. 2. The history, context and subject-matter of section 27 show this to be its object: The history of the different amendments to section 27 and the discussions of the provisions of article 2, given above, bear with equal force on this object of the statute. 3. Even if all the preservatives are harmless, their sale can be prohibited to prevent fraud: Defendant urges unconstitutionality against the statute solely because it would prevent the sale of what he calls harm- less preservatives. Admitting for argument they were all harm- less, the police power may be exercised to prevent fraud. If the statute sought to prevent the sale of a dairy product con- taining any harmless foreign substance under any name than the name of a dairy product, it would manifestly be unconsti- tutional under the decision of People v. Mara, 99 N. Y., 377, but the statute is directed to prevent the sale as dairy products of dairy products which do contain a foreign substance. Dairy products are of such character and constituency that every one knows their origin and their constituents. A purchaser of dairy products desires dairy products, and not dairy products plus some other substance. It is most absurd for the defend- ant to argue, as he did in the lower court, that this act pro- hibits the sale of Matzoon, or Sparklets, or Kuymss, or milk punch, or carbonic acid gas, or boracic acid. He calls all of these, I suppose, within the statute’s meaning of the word preservative. The absurdity of this reasoning would command no attention from the plaintiff were it not 62 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE that the decision of the Special Term and the decision of the Appellate Division suggests that the minds of the lower courts were deceived by this specious suggestion. This act does not prohibit a dairy product to be sold under the name of Kuymss or Matzoon, any more than it prohibits the sale of butter mixed with a foreign substance to be made into a hard sauce, or milk to be mixed with eggs and be sold as custard, or to be mixed with liquor to be sold as punch; but it does declare it to be a fraud to mix any of these substances with a dairy product, or to make any formula or de- coction containing milk and then to sell them as milk, or as butter, or as cheese. All the substances may not only in them- selves be harmless which are mixed with dairy products, but after any chemical action brought about by their mixture, the resultant compound might even be helpful, yet such mixture ought not to be allowed to be sold as a pure dairy product. hia People v. Girard, 145 N. Y., 105, Judge Finch sums up the argument for the plaintiff. In that case the statute prohibited the introduction of any coloring matter into vinegar, and the words in the following quotation, not in italics, have been inserted simply to substitute the words dairy products in place of the word vinegar where that word appears in the original opinion. We quote verbatim in italics: It must also be assumed that the Legislature acted with knowledge of dairy products, of their appearance and the modes of their manufacture. Everybody is familiar with dairy products, for they go into all households. Their color and appearance are as well under- stood as their taste, but a dairy product has come upon the market containing a foreign substance called a preservative. Jt is said to be entirely healthy and a safe food product, and that may be granted. No law forbids its manufacture or sale. The markets of the State are open to it freely and without restraint, and the only prohibition is against the fraud of a false condition. Purchasers had a natural preference for the old familiar article and were more or less averse to an experiment with the q COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 63 new. The greed of profit, which has adulterated or disguised almost every article of food, has led to the device of preventing natural decay or decomposition by mixing and introducing into a dairy product a substance or chemical working its effect by producing a rigid cohesion of the molecules of the food. Although it is changed, the new product, nevertheless, has a natural appearance and deceives purchasers. They accept %, supposing it to be a pure dairy product in the condition of na- ture and prepared for human digestion as nature prepares it. It is offered to them under the name and guise, color and consistency of the real dairy product, and they take it and use it and feed it to their children, believing that the natural food is being assimilated by them. Jt masks the truth, tt effects a disguise, it naturally deceives and is intended to deceive. The purchaser comes and asks for a pure, fresh dairy product. The seller gwes him a preserved dairy product, an old, second-hand dairy product, kept by a “ preservative” from actual odor and all those signs which indicate uncleanness, unwholesomeness and decay. It is apparent that the “ preservative” was used for deception and to defraud the buyer. The Legislature had a right to forbid that device and to put a stop to the fraud, but how are they to do so? The Legislature might make the prohibition aguinst a “preservative ” for the reason that any tampering with food products which adds ingredients, not natural or essential, is fraught with danger to the public health or, at least, involves the intent and result of a fraud upon the community. Food should be pure, abso- lutely and unquestionably pure. ‘No tricks should be played with it. The Legislature may resolutely protect it. No “ preservative ” could ever be added to a dairy product and the result sold as a dairy product for any good or honest purpose that I can imagine Counsel might say: “ A dairy product might contain a harmless preservative changing the appearance of the dairy product so that no purchaser would take it for a dairy product, and yet this law is broad enough to forbid that, I grant it. The case is imagimary, but assume it to be real. The permission to any “ preservative ” opens the door to other preservatives and which might well be dan- 64 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE gerous to the public health. Must the Legislature wait for the experi- ment and until some number of people are made sick or die of it? In so serious a matter as the absolute purity of food, we ought not to say that a general law which simply compels that absolute purity is beyond the power of the Legislature. This is by no means the first time that the Legislature has acted by a general law in seeking to protect the public health and safety. Every general law may work harshly in a few particular instances. Adding a foreign or artificial ingredient to a food product, even for purposes of color merely, is in effect an adulteration, and whether it be so described or forbidden by more specific terms is not material. The Legislature may and does legislate to prevent foreign substances being put into the feed of cows and into the milk drawn from the cows; to prevent animal fats, vegetable oils and coloring matter to be put into butter, cheese and milk. What distinction will the defendant urge in favor of his pre- servaline that makes it beyond the power of the Legislature to prevent his foreign substances being put into all dairy prod- ucts. Is it because he selects as a name for his foreign sub- stance a word which ordinarily means harmlessness and preservation. “In so serious a matter as the absolute purity of food we ought not to say that a general law which simply compels that absolute purity is beyond the power of the Legislature.”’—People v. Girard (supra). POINT IV. Cases INVOLVING PoLIcE PowprR DISTINGUISHED AND APPLIED TO THD STATUTE IN THIS CASE. 1. Illustrations of legislation beyond police power: In re Jacobs, 98 N. Y., 98. The law prohibiting the making of cigars in certain houses was unconstitutional because the law on its face showed that it was not intended to promote the public health, and would have no such result. It was class legislation to favor some in a given business over their com- petitors. The subject in this case is entirely and solely of food. It prefers no one food above another. It does not prohibit one COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 65 preservative and allow another preservative to be used. It is general legislation for the whole State. In the case of People v. Marz, 99 N. Y., 877, the decision was entirely based upon the fact that the oleomargarine was not sold as butter, but was represented and offered for sale in the place of butter. In that case the court said there was testimony that oleomargarine was harmless. The opinion says: “The General Term has interpreted the act to prohibit the sale of an artificial compound as genuine butter. If that is a correct interpretation of the act, we shall concur, but we do not so interpret the act. It is not to prevent the sale in imita- tion, but a sale to take the place of.” This statute in this case would not be against this defendant if they sold their dairy product containing their “ harmless pre- Servative ” under a new name and in place of the real thing. If it is in fact a harmless preservative, no act could prevent a business in it in place of the real thing. The case of People v. Gilson, 109 N. Y., 389, involved the statute making it a misdemeanor for any person to sell food and give away any other thing as a gift as part of the same transaction. The decision was entirely based on the view that the act com- plained of was “ Evidently that kind which has been so frequent of late, the kind which is given to protect one class in the com- munity against the fair, free and full competition of some other class.” The statute in that case had not the slightest tendency to prevent dealing in impure, unwholesome and adulterated food. The case of People ex rel. Tyroler v. Warden, 157 N. Y., 116, was decided upon the same reason. The statute against the business of cut rate ticket sellers was legislation in favor of one class against another in the com- munity, and having no clear intent to protect either the public health nor indeed to prevent fraud. 2. Illustrations of valid exercise of police power: In the People ex rel. Nechamous v. Warden, 144 N. Y., 529, the court held to be constitutional an act which required a man to 5 66 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE pass an examination and get a license before he could act as a master plumber. Sustaining that act as being within the police power, the court said that drainage and sewerage affect the public health, and that the act was intended to require capacity in those who were doing such work. The court did say in that case: “Tam not unwilling to state that the act skirts pretty closely that border line beyond which legislation ceased to be within the powers conferred by the people of the State through the constitution upon its legislative body.” In the Master Plumbers’ Act, did the Legislature intend to guard the public health, and in this act for dairy products did the Legislature have no such intention? So also the following statutes have been held to be within the police power: The exclusion of citizens by reason of race and color from the equal enjoyment of any privilege furnished by owners of places of amusement is prohibited.—People v. King (supra). Owners must furnish water at one or more places on each floor in tenement houses.—Health Department v. Rector (supra). Barbers shall not work on Sunday, excepting in the city of New York and the village of Saratoga Springs. Laws of 1895, chapter 823. It is a crime to exhibit a female child as a dancer or any theatrical exhibition. Penal Code, section 292. It is a crime to charge for elevating grain in a price greater than that fixed by law. Laws of 1888, chapter 581. If all these restraints be within the police power, what dis- tinction makes it a gross usurpation of constitutional power to prevent the sale of dairy products containing foreign sub- stances? POINT V. Tur PRESUMPTION OF CONSTITUTIONALITY UNDER THE DECISIONS Cannot BE OvERCOME BY DEFENDANT. “Weare not unmindful that the power which courts possess to condemn acts should be exercised with great caution and even with reluctance.”—In Matter of Jacobs, 98 N. Y., 98. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 67 “Nothing but a clear violation of the constitution, an un- ‘doubted usurpation of power prohibited, will justify declaring an act of the legislative department null and void.”—People v. West, 106 N. Y., 293; People v. Kibler, 106 N. Y., 321. “It is an undoubted right of the Legislature to judge for itself of the character and extent of the danger which is shown to exist, and to apply the remedy by a definite rule of prohibi- tion.”—People v. Girard, 145 N. Y., 105. “It is within the province of the Legislature to determine what laws are needed for the protection of the public, and so long as its measures are calculated and appropriate to accomp- lish that end its discretion may not be reviewed by the Courts.”—Colon v. Lisk, 153 N. Y., 188. “Courts should always assume that the Legislature intended by its enactment to promote those ends (the good of protecting the public health and of serving the public comfort and safety), and if the act admits of two constructions, that one should be given to it which sustains it and makes it applicable in further- cance of the public interests.”’—People ex rel. Nechameus v. Warden, 144 N. Y., 536. “It has been frequently held and is acknowledged by all ‘courts, that a statutory enactment will not be declared uncon- stitutional, and therefore void, unless a clear and substantial conflict exists between it and the constitution. It has been further held that every presumption is in favor of constitution- ality; that the case must be practically free from doubt before an act of the Legislature should be declared unconstitutional.”— People v. Gillson, 109 N. Y., 397. “Statutes should be construed, if possible, so as to avoid absurdity and manifest injustice.” “They should receive such construction as to render them practicable, just and reasonably convenient.” “They should be construed to avoid, if possible, constitutional restrictions and understood in a sense within such limitations rather than in conflict with them. “Where a public and beneficial purpose is evident the courts 68 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE will not substitute their judgment for that of the legislative body. The remedy must be found in an appeal to the legisla- tive wisdom.’’—People v. Buffalo Fish Co., 164 N. Y., 97. “A statute cannot be declared unconstitutional unless it can be shown beyond reasonable doubt that it is in conflict with some particular provision of the organic law, nor until every reason- able mode of reconciliation with the constitution has been re- sorted to, and reconciliation has been found impossible. The presumption of constitutionality attaches to every statute passed by the Legislature, and the burden of establishing its unconstitutionality rests upon and must be borne by the party asserting it.”—-People ex rel. Henderson v. Supervisors, 147 N. Y., 1; People ex rel. Tyroler v. Warden, 157 N. Y., 149. POINTE VE The judgments of lower courts should be reversed, and judg- ment absolute be entered against defendant. N. Y., October 29, 1901. Respectfully submitted, JOHN C. DAVIES, Attorney-General, for Plaintiff-A ppellant. Of Counsel, SAMUBL S. SLATER, JOHN C. DAVIES. Regarding respondent’s contention that section 37 gives only one relief and that a criminal prosecution and the contention that if two penalties are imposed it is against United States constitution and New York constitution as being twice in jeop- ardy, see Matter of Sawyer, 124 U.S., 219, held: Amendments to constitution apply to U. S. legislation only and to same effect Spies v. Illinois, 123 U.S., 131. Matter of Leseyusky, 16 Blatchford 9, held: “Congress could pass act imposing a penalty of $100 recovered civilly and also a punishment to be imposed criminally.” COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 69 People v. Meakim, 133 N. Y., 214, held: “ It is well settled that the law may provide for the recovery in a civil action of a penalty and for a criminal proceeding also by indictment for same offense.” For cases on constitutionality involving police power, see also Powell v. Commonwealth, (?) U. S., (2); Mueler v. Kansas, 123 U.S., 623; Lawton v. Steele, 119 N. Y., 226 and 152 U.S., 133; Schollen- berger v. Pennsylvania, 171, U. S., 1; 74 N. Y., 509; 120 N. Y., 628; mMeN, Y.1418. 117 Nov, 12 144 N. Yq, 529; 149) .N. ¥., 195;0100 Nea, 1235106 N. Y.,,293;,106.N. ¥.,,321; 113 U.8.,.27. The following are the brief and points of the defendants: COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. The People of the State of New York, Appellant, against John S. Biesecker, Respondent, No. 728. RESPONDENT’S BRIEF. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION FOR THR First JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT UNANIMOUSLY AFFIRM- ING FinaL JUDGMENT SUSTAINING DEMURRER TO AMENDED CoMPLAINT ENTERED ON DECISION OF Mr. JUSTICE BISCHOFF AT SPECIAL TERM. ee STATEMENT. This is the first of a large number of actions brought through- out the State to recover $100 penalty which it is claimed has been incurred by various defendants through alleged violation of section 27 of the Agricultural Law as amended by chapter 534 of the Laws of 1900. The only provision of the law which it is claimed has been violated is as follows, being a portion of section 27, as amended by chapter 534 of the Laws of 1900: “No person shall sell, offer or expose for sale, any butter or other dairy products containing a preservative, but this shall not be construed to prohibit the use of salt in butter or cheese, or spirituous liquors in club or other fancy cheese or sugar in condensed milk. No person or persons, firm, association or cor- 70 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE poration shall induce or attempt to induce any person or persons to violate any of the provisions of the Agricultural Law. Any person, firm, association or corporation selling, offering or ad- vertising for sale any substance, preparation or matter for use in violation of the provisions of the Agricultural Law shall be guilty of a violation of this act.” The penalty for the volation of the above-quoted section is prescribed by section 37 of the Agricultural Law, which at the date of the alleged violation and at the commencement of this action read, as amended by chapter 485 of the Laws of 1899, is as follows: “ Every person violating any of the provisions of articles two- and three and sections ninety-one and ninety-two of the Agri- cultural Law and chapter four hundred and ninety-one of the Laws of eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, shall forfeit to the People of the State of New York a sum not less than twenty-five dollars nor more than one hundred dollars for every such vio- lation.” Aside from the provisions of section 27 as amended by chap- ter 534 of the Laws of 1900, it will be conceded that there is no provision of law under which it can be claimed that the com- plaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. By this demurrer the defendant presents the contention that section 27 of the Agricultural Law, as amended by chapter 534 of the Laws of 1900, in so far as it prohibits the use, manufac- ture and sale of all preservatives, is unconstitutional. This statute on its face probibits the use of ice in butter or vichy in milk. It forbids the manufacture and sale of such well- known products as “matzoon,” “kumyss,” and “ zoolak,” the much-advertised “ Sparklets,’ which produce aerated milk, and numerous other products of a similar character. Even the sale of a “milk punch” is within the inhibition of the statute. Not only is the use of these products prohibited and made subject to a penalty to be recovered in a civil action, but by another clause of the Agricultural Law it is made a misdemeanor and punish- able criminally—A gricultural Law, § 37, as amended by L. 1899, Ch. 435. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. fal Mr. Justice Bischoff at Special Term declared the section 27 of the Agricultural Law unconstitutional and accordingly sus- tained the demurrer. His opinion (fols. 25, et seq.), contains a clear exposition of the law. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment entered upon Mr. Justice Bischoff’s decision to the Appellate Division for the First Judicial Department, which unanimously affirmed the judgment below. Mr. Justice McLaughlin’s opinion (fols. 49 et seq.), adopted by entire court, contains an exhaustive review of the law. The plaintiff now appeals to this court from the judgment and order of affirmance of the Appellate Division. Upon this appeal the defendant raises not only the contention that that portion of section 27 of the Agricultural Law which was added by chapter 534 of the Laws of 1900, is unconstitu- tional, but also the contention that section 37 of the ‘A gricul- tural Law, which fixes the penalty for a violation of this and of other sections of the Agricultural Law, does not authorize any civil action, but merely a criminal one. The latter point has never been raised in any of the courts in this State, and as it is of importance, because of the large number of actions pending under this and other clauses of the Agricultural Law, we earn- estly request the court to pass upon it. FIRST POINT: Tue COMPLAINT Does Not State Facts SuFFICIENT TO CONSTI- TUTE A CAUSE OF ACTION BECAUSE SECTION 27 oF THE AGRI- CULTURAL LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. It is not charged that the defendant sold or offered for sale any butter or dairy product containing a preservative, but it is alleged that the defendant sold a substance or a matter called “ Preservaline,” which was declared and advertised by him to be a preservative of butter or other dairy products and which is a preservative of butter or dairy products. And it is further al- leged that the defendant advertised and offered it for sale with G2 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THD intent that the purchaser should mix it with natural milk or cream and other dairy products. In the amended complaint it is not asserted that the product so advertised is harmful or injurious to public health or con- tains any poisonous or deleterious substances; that is not a mere oversight, but an intentional omission, inasmuch as the aticle “ Preservaline ” has been dealt in and used for upwards of twenty years with beneficial results. It is a matter of common knowledge that such preservatives as ice, carbonic acid gas, sugar, salt, borax and boracic acid are in daily use; the use of these articles or even of ice in butter or the combination of vichy and milk is within the prohibition of this statute. So are the well known products “ Matzoon,” “ Kumyss ” and “ Zoolak,” and the much-advertised “ Sparklets,” which produce aerated milk. Equally prohibited is the sale of a “milk punch” or an oyster stew.) Accordingly, the question here presented is, whether or not the Legislature has the right to so amend the Agricultural Law as to prohibit any one from “ selling, offering or advertising for sale’? any preservative whatsoever, as the act makes no distine- tion between preservatives which may be harmful and preserva- tives which, as in the present instance, are beneficial. It is not claimed in the complaint that the defendant induced or attempted to induce any person toviolate the provisions of the Agricultural Law, the allegation being merely that it was sold with “intent and recommendation ” that the purchaser should mix the Preservaline with dairy products and then sell it. Whatever may have been the intent or recommendation of the defendant, neither could be held to be an inducement nor an attempt to induce another person to violate the law.—Strong v. Stebbins, 5 Cowen, 210. The act under consideration violates the Constitution of the United States as well as the Constitution of the State of New York. The fifth amendment to the United States Constitution pro- vides as follows: COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 73 “No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime * * * nor be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process oflaw. * * *” The fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitu- tion contains a similar prohibition against State legislation. Article I, section 6 of the New York State Constitution pro- vides among other things: “No person shall be subject to be twice put in jeopardy for the same offence * * * nor be deprived of life, liberty or prop- erty without due process of law. * * *” At the outset it should be noted that this act is entitled “An act to amend the Agricultural Law relative to violations thereof,” and that the Agricultural Law is entitled “An act in relation to agriculture;” this act forms no part of the Public Health Law, and the purpose of the act as discernible from its title, is to affect agriculture. The act in question deprives persons of their “ life, liberty and property without due process of law” within the meaning of the consitutional provision. In matter of application of Jacobs, 98 N. Y., 98, these pro- visions were considered by the Court of Appeals. In that case the act under consideration prohibited the manufacture of cigars and preparations of tobacco in certain tenement houses. Earl, J., delivering the unanimous opinion of the court, said (p. 104): “ What does this act attempt to do? In form it makes it a crime of a cigarmaker in New York and Brooklyn, the only cities in the State having a population exceeding 500,000, to carry on a perfectly lawful trade in his own home. Whether he owns the tenement house or has hired a room therein for the purpose of prosecuting his trade, he cannot manufacture therein his own tobacco into cigars for his own use or for sale, and he will become a criminal for doing that which is perfectly lawful outside of the two cities named—everywhere else, so far as we are able to learn, in the whole world. * * * (P. 105.) It is, therefore, plain that this law interferes with the profitable and free use of his property by the owner or G4 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE lessee of a tenement house who is a cigarmaker, and trammels him in the application of his industry and the disposition of his labor, and thus, in a strictly legitimate sense, it arbitrarily deprives him of his property and of some portion of his personal liberty. The constitutional guaranty that no person shall be deprived of his property without due process of law may be violated without the physical taking of property for public or private use. Property may be destroyed, or its value may be annihi- lated; it is owned and kept for some useful purpose, and it has no value unless it can be used. Its capability for enjoyment and adaptability to some use are essential characteristics and attributes without which property cannot be conceived; and hence any law which destroys it or its value, or takes away any of its essential attributes, deprives the owner of his property. * * * (P. 106.) So, too, one may be deprived of his liberty and his constitutional rights thereto violated without the actual im- prisonment or restraint of his person. Liberty, in its broad sense, as understood in this country, means the right, not only of freedom from actual servitude, imprisonment or restraint, but the right of one to use his faculties in all lawful ways, to live and work where he will, to earn his livelihood in any law- ful calling, and to pursue any lawful trade or avocation. All laws, therefore, which impair or trammel these rights, which limit one in his choice of a trade or profession, or confine him to work or live in a specified locality, or exclude him from his own house, or restrain his otherwise lawful movement (except as such laws may be passed in the exercise of the legislature of the police power, which will be noticed later), are infringe- ments upon his fundamental rights of liberty, which are under constitutional protection. In Butchers’ Union Company v. Crescent City Co. (111 U. S., 746), Field, J., says: “That among the inalienable rights as proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence ‘is the right of men who pursue any lawful business or vocation in any manner not inconsistent with the COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 15 equal rights of others which may increase their property or develop their faculties, so as to give them their highest enjoy- ment. The common business and callings of life, the ordinary trades and pursuits which are innocent in themselves, and have been followed in all communities from time immemorial, must, therefore, be free in this country to all alike upon the same terms. The right to pursue them without let or hindrance, ex- cept that which is applied to all persons of the same age, sex and condition, is a distinguishing privilege of citizens of the United States, and an essential element of that freedom which they claim as their birthright.’ In the same case Bradley, J., says: ‘I hold that the liberty of pursuit, the right to follow any of the ordinary callings of life, is one of the privileges of a citizen of the United States,’ of which he cannot be deprived without invading his right to liberty within the meaning of the Constitution. In Live Stock, etc., Association v. Crescent City, etc., Company (1 Abb. U. 8., 388, 398), the learned presiding jus- tice says: ‘There is no more sacred right of citizenship than the right to pursue unmolested a lawful employment in a law- ful manner. It is nothing more or less than the sacred right of labor” In Wynehamer v. People, Johnson, J., says: ‘That a law which shouid make it a crime for men either to live in, or rent or sell their houses,’ would violate the constitutional guar- anty of personal liberty. In Bertholf v. O'Reilly (74 N. Y., 509, 515), Andrews, J., says: That one could ‘be deprived of his lib- erty in a constitutional sense without putting his person in con- finement,’ and that a man’s right to liberty included ‘ the right to exercise his faculties and to follow a lawful avocation for the support of life.’ ” The court then proceeds to examine the question whether the law under consideration could be sustained as an exercise of the police power and as a health law, and states: (P. 107.) “* But the claim is made that the Legislature could pass this act in the exercise of the police power which every Sovereign State possesses. That power is very broad and com- prehensive, and is exercised to promote the health, comfort, 76 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE safety and welfare of society. Its exercise in extreme cases is frequently justified by the maxim salus populi suprema lex est. It is used to regulate the use of property by enforcing the maxim sic utere tuo, ut alienum non laedas. Under it the con- duct of an individual and the use of property may be regulated so as to interfere, to some extent, with the freedom of the one and the enjoyment of the other; and in cases of great emergency engendering overruling necessity, property may be taken or destroyed without compensation, and without what is com- ‘monly called due process of law. The limit of the power can- not be accurately defined, and the courts have not been able or willing definitely to circumscribe it. But the power however broad and extensive, is not above the Constitution. When it speaks, its voice must be heeded. It furnishes the supreme law, the guide for the conduct of legislators, judges and private per- sons, and so far as it imposes restraints, the police power must be exercised in subordination thereto.” After citing numerous authorities, the court continues: (P. 110.) “ These citations are sufficient to show that the police power is not without limitations, and that in its exercise the legislature must respect the great fundamental rights guaran- teed by the Constitution. If this were otherwise, the power of the legislature would be practically without limitation. In the assumed exercise of the police power in the interest of the health, the welfare or the safety of the public, every right of the citizen might be invaded and every constitutional barrier swept away. “Generally it is for the legislature to determine what laws and regulations are needed to protect the public health and secure the public comfort and safety, and while its measures are cal- culated, intended, convenient and appropriate to accomplish these ends, the exercise of its discretion is not subject to re- view by the courts. But they must have some relation to these ends. Under the mere guise of police regulations, personal rights and private property cannot be arbitrarily invaded, and the determination of the legislature is not final or conclusive. CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. ae If it passes an act ostensibly for the public health, and thereby destroys or takes away the property of a citizen, or interferes with his personal liberty, then it is for the courts to scrutinize the act and see whether it really relates and is convenient and appropriate to promote the public health. It matters not that the legislature may in the title to the act, or in its body, declare that it is intended for the improvement of the public health. Such a declaration does not conclude the courts, and they must yet determine the fact declared and enforce the supreme law.” In conclusion the court lays down this clear statement and rule (p. 115): “When a health law is challenged in the courts as unconsti- tutional on the ground that it arbitrarily interferes with per- sonal liberty and private property without due process of law, the courts must be able to see that it has at least, in fact, some relation to the public health, that the public health is the end actually aimed at, and that it is appropriate and adapted to that end. This we have not been able to see in this law, and we must, therefore, pronounce it unconstitutional and void. In reaching this conclusion we have not been unmindful that the power which courts possess to condemn legislative acts which are in conflict with the supreme law should be exercised with great caution and even with reluctance. But as said by Chan- cellor Kent (1 Com. 450): ‘It is only by the free exercise of this power that courts of justice are enabled to repel assaults and to protect every part of the government and every member of the community from undue and destructive innovations upon their charter rights,’ ” It is thus apparent: First—That the right to prevent any one from pursuing a hitherto lawful calling, such as in this case, the manufacture and sale of preservatives, exists only where the Legislature de- clares that such right is exercised as a measure to preserve the public health. The act under consideration is not an amend- ment of the Health Law, but an amendment of the Agricultural Law. It does not purport to prohibit merely deleterious pre- 78 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THR servatives, but to prohibit the use and sale of preservatives of every character and description. Second.—That even if the Legislature, under the guise of a health law, attempts to interfere with personal liberty and the exercise of a lawful calling, the act by which it attempts to do so cannot be sustained as constitutional unless it is ap- parent on the face thereof that it has relation to the public health, and that the provisions of the act are appropriate and adapted to that end. Even if it were claimed in the case at bar that the act under consideration was intended as a health measure, it is very clear that its provisions are not appropriate and adapted to that end, and that the act under question does not actually aim at benefiting the public health. The prohibi- tion of the sale of beneficial preservatives which have been in use for many years in this State, cannot in any way benefit the public health. On the contrary, such prohibition is apt to be a detriment to the public. Aside from the common knowledge that most, if not all, pre- servatives are harmless (the statute itself enumerates sugar and salt), the term “ preservative,” itself, signifies something having a preserving quality and beneficial effect; preservation is the antithesis of decay. The Century Dictionary defines “ preservative ” as follows: “That which preserves; anything which tends to keep safe and sound, or free from injury, corruption or decay; a preventive of damage, decomposition or waste.” The Standard Dictionary gives this definition: “That which keeps safe or tends to preserve; that which has power to keep safe or sound; a safeguard.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1897 edition) defines “ preserva- tion ” as follows (vol. 2, p. 733): “ Keeping safe from harm; avoiding injury. This term always presupposes a real or existing danger.” In the best literature the term “ preservative” has always been given the same meaning. In the “ House of the Seven Gables,’ IX, Hawthorne says: COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 79 “This facile adaptation was at once the symptom of perfect health and its best preservative.” Lord Bacon wrote: “Tt hath been anciently in use to wear tablets of arsenic as preservatives against the plague.” The statute itself declares salt, spirituous liquors and sugar to be preservatives. It permits the use of salt in butter, but prohibits it in milk. It permits the use of sugar in milk, but prohibits it in butter. It permits the use of spirituous liquor in fancy cheese, but pro- hibits it in plain cheese, milk or butter. The statute further provides that butter may not be preserved except by salt, cheese except by liquor, condensed milk except by sugar. It prohibits the use of all preservatives which may he more wholesome, inexpensive and readily available. A somewhat similar statute prohibiting the sale of articles o” food was declared unconstitutional by the Court of Appeals in People v. Gillson, 109 N. Y., 389. The statute under consideration in that case prohibited the sale of any article of food or offer or attempt to sell the same upon any representation or inducement that anything else can be delivered as a prize, gift or premium to the purchaser. The unanimous opinion of the Court of Appeals by Peckham, J., contains the following language (fols. 398-400): “At the same time it must be remembered that the Constitu- tion is the supreme law of the land, and that when an act of the Legislature properly comes before the court to be compared by it with the fundamental law, it is the duty of the court to declare the invalidity of the act if it violate any provision of that law. The defendant here appeals for his protection to the clause, among others, in the Constitution which provides that no per- son shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. The meaning of this provision in our State Con- stitution has frequently been the subject of judicial investiga- tion, and this court has had occasion, very recently, to discuss 80 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE it in quite a number of cases, and a further elaboration is not needed. The following propositions are firmly established and recog- nized: a person living under our Constitution has the right to adopt and follow such lawful industrial pursuit, not injurious to the community, as he may see fit. The term ‘liberty’ as used in the Constitution is not dwarfed into mere freedom from physical restraint of the person of the citizen as by incarcera- tion, but is deemed to embrace the right of man to be free in the enjoyment of the faculties with which he has been endowed by his Creator, subject only to such restraints as are necessary for the common welfare. Liberty, in its broad sense, as under- stood in this country, means the right not only of freedom from servitude, imprisonment or restraint, but the right of one to use his faculties in all lawful ways to live and work where he will, to earn his livelihood in any lawful calling and to pursue any lawful trade or avocation. These principles are contained and stated in the above language in various cases, among which are Live Stock Association v. Crescent City, etc., Co. (1 Abb. U. S., 388, 398); Slaughter House Cases (16 Wall., 36, 106); Matter of Jacobs (98 N. Y., 98); Bertholf v. O’Reilly (74 id., 509); People v. Mare (99 id., 377). It is quite clear that some or all of these fundamental and valuable rights are invaded, weakened, limited or destroyed by the legislation under consideration. It is evidently of that kind which has been so frequent of late, a kind which is meant to protect some class in the community against the fair, free and full competition of some other class, the members of the former class thinking it impossible to hold their own against such competition, and, therefore, flying to the legislature to secure some enactment which shall operate favorably to them or un- favorably to their competitors in the commercial, agricultural, manufacturing or producing field. By the provisions of this act a man owning articles of food which he wished to sell or dispose of is limited in his powers of sale or disposition. A liberty to adopt or follow for a livelihood a lawful industrial COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 81 pursuit, and in a manner not injurious to the community, is certainly infringed upon, limited, perhaps weakened or destroyed by such legislation. It is certainly lawful to sell (as in this instance) coffee. It is an article of food, and is now almost one of the necessaries of life to a large number of people. A person engaged as a retailer of coffee might very well think that he could greatly enlarge the amount of his trade by doing precisely what was done by the defendant in this case, and that while his profits on the same amount of coffee sold would be smaller than if he gave no present, yet by the growth of his trade his income at the end of the year would be more than by the old method. This statute, if valid, steps in to prevent his adopting such a course, to procure trade and from it to secure an income and livelihood for himself and family. He is thus restrained in the free enjoyment of his faculties, which he ought to have the right and liberty to use in the way of creating or adopting plans for the increase and growth of his trade, busi- ness or occupation, unless such restraint is necessary for the common welfare. This law interferes with the free sale of food, for the condition is imposed that no one shall sell food and at the same time, and as part of the transaction, give away any other thing. It is not material if by reason of the prohibition the owner’s sales of food are greatly cut down and his ability to support his family thereby, perhaps, largely decreased. If the law is valid, the fact of its existence is a complete answer to the complaints of the owner of food that his liberty to sell his property and his chance to make a livelihood are very greatly impaired. It cannot be truthfully maintained that this legislation does not seriously infringe upon the liberty of the owner or dealer in food products to pursue a lawful calling in a proper manner, or that it does not, to some extent at least, deprive a person of his property by curtailing his power of sale, and unless this infringement and deprivation are reasonably necessary for the common welfare, or may be said to fairly tend in that direction 6 82 NintoH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE or to that result, the legislation is invalid as plainly violative of the constitutional provision under discussion.” The court then considers the question of the validity of the act as the exercise of the police power and of the health pro- vision, and states that the law upon this subject is settled con- clusively by In re Jacobs, supra, and People v. Mara, 99 N. Y., 37 hereafter to be discussed. The case most similar to the one at bar is that of People v. Marz; 99 N. Y., 377. The act under consideration in that case provided as follows: “§ 6. No person shall manufacture out of any oleaginous sub- stances, or any compound of the same, other than that produced from unadulterated milk or of cream from the same, any article designed to take the place of butter or cheese, produced from pure unadulterated milk or cream of the same, or shall sell or offer to sell the same as an article of food. This provision shall not apply to pure skim milk cheese produced from pure skim milk.” A violation of the above section subjected the violator, under the provisions of the act, to a penalty. It was held (p. 377) that the act was unconstitutional, “inasmuch as the prohibition is not limited to unwholesome or simulated substitutes, but abso- lutely prohibits the manufacture or sale of any compound de- signed to be used as a substitute for butter or cheese, however wholesome, valuable or cheap it may be, and however openly and fairly the character of the substitute may be avowed and published.” The court, after stating (p. 383) that the act by its terms was “ Broad enough in its terms to embrace not only oleomargarine, but any other compound, however wholesome, valuable or cheap, which has been or may be discovered or devised for the purpose of being used as a substitute for butter,” continued in the course of its opinion (pp. 385-389): “Tt appears to us quite clear that the object and effect of the enactment under consideration were not to supplement the existing provisions against fraud and deception by means of COMMISSIONER oF AGRICULTURE. 83: imitations of dairy butter, but to take a further and bolder step, and by absolutely prohibiting the manufacture or sale of any article which could be used as a substitute for it, however openly and fairly the character of the substitute might be avowed and published, to drive the substituted article from the market, and protect those engaged in the manufacture of dairy products, against the competition of cheaper substances, capable of being applied to the same uses, as articles of food. The learned counsel for the respondent frankly meets this view, and claims in his points as he did orally upon the argu- ment, that even if it were certain that the sole object of the enactment was to protect the dairy industry in this State against the substitution of a cheaper article made from cheaper materials, this would not be bevond the power of the legisia- ture. This we think is the real question presented in the case. Conceding that the only limits upon the legislative power of the State are those imposed by the State Constitution and that of the United States, we are called upon to determine whether or not those limits are transgressed by an enactment of this description. These limitations upon legislative power are neces- sarily very general in their terms, but are at the same time very comprehensive. The Constitution of the State provides (article I, section 1), that no member of this State shall be dis- franchised, or deprived of any of the rights and privileges se- cured to any citizen thereof, unless by the law of the land, or the judgment of his peers. Section 6 of article 1 provides that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. And the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States provided that ‘no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.’ These constitutional safe- guards have been so thoroughly discussed in recent cases that it would be superfluous to do more than refer to the conclusions $4 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE which have been reached bearing upon the question now under consideration. Among these, no proposition is now more firmly settled than that it is one of the fundamental rights and privileges of every American citizen to adopt and follow such lawful industrial pursuit, not injurious to the community as he may see fit . (Live Stock Ass’n v. The Crescent City, etc. 1 Abb. U. &., 398; Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall., 106; Corfield v. Coryell, 4 Wash. C. C., 380; Matter of Jacobs, 98 N. Y. 98). The term ‘liberty,’ as protected by the Constitution, is not cramped into a mere freedom from physical restraint of the person of the citizen, as by incarceration, but is deemed to embrace the right of man to be free in the enjoyment of the faculties with which he has been endowed by his Creator, subject only to such restraints as are necessary for the common welfare. In the language of Andrew, J., in Bertholf v. O’ Reilly (74 N. Y., 515), the right to liberty embraces the right of man ‘ to exercise his facul- ties and to follow a lawful avocation for the support of life,’ and ag expressed by Earl, J., In re Jacobs, ‘one may be deprived of his liberty, and his constitutional right thereto violated, without the actual restraint of his person. Liberty in its broad sense, as understood in this country, means the right not only of free- dom from servitude, imprisonment or restraint, but the right of one to use his faculties in all lawful ways, to live and work where he will, to earn his livelihood in any lawful calling, and to pursue any lawful trade or avocation.’ Who will have the temerity to say that these constitutional principles are not violated by an enactment which absolutely prohibits an important branch of industry for the sole reason that it competes with another, and may reduce the price of an article of food for the human race. Measures of this kind are dangerous even to their promotors. If the argument of the respondent in support of the absolute power of the legislature to prohibit one branch of the industry for the purpose of protecting another with which it competes can be sustained, why could not the oleomargarine manufac- 19/4) COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. or turers, should they obtain sufficient power to influence or con- trol the legislative councils, prohibit the manufacture or sale of dairy products? Would arguments then be found wanting to demonstrate the invalidity under the Constitution of such an act? The principle is the same in both cases. The numbers en- gaged upon each side of the controversy cannot influence the question here. Equal rights to all are what are intended to be secured by the establishment of constitutional limits to legis- lative power, and impartial tribunals to enforce them. Illustrations might be indefinitely multiplied of the evils which would result from legislation which should exclude one class of citizens from industries, lawful in other respects, in order to protect another class against competition. We cannot doubt that such legislation is violative of the letter, as well as of the spirit of the constitutional provisions before referred to, nor that such is the character of the enactment under which the appellant was convicted.” So in the case at bar, as the statute does not by its language | purport to prohibit merely unwholesome preservatives, but pre- servatives of every character, however beneficial or wholesome, it is clearly violative of the provisions of the Constitution. The Legislature has no right to probibit this defendant from exercis- ing the lawful calling of manufacturing or selling preservatives, a business in which thousands have been engaged for years past. It has no right to prohibit the manufacture or use of ice to pre- serve dairy products, nor the sale of vichy and milk, “ Matzoon,” “Kumyss,” “Sparklets” or even a milk punch. All of the above cases have recently been followed, and the policy of the law once more strongly asserted in the recent case of People ex rel. Tyroler v. Warden, 157 N. Y., 116, where the court held, through Chief Justice Parker, that the Legislature has no right to prohibit parties from engaging in the business of ticket scalping in which they had hitherto been lawfully engaged. The chief justice states (p. 132): “Tf the law were otherwise no trade, business or profession could escape destruction at the hands of the Legislature if a 86 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE situation should arise that would stimulate it to exercise its power, for in every field of endeavor can be found men that seek profit by fraudulent processes.” If the Legislature may lawfully prohibit the manufacture and sale of wholesome preservatives it may equally prohibit the manufacture or sale of shoes, clothes or any articles of com- merce or food whatever. In Dorsey v. State of Texas, 38 Texas Criminal Reports, 527, 40 L. R. A., 201, the court held: “ The mixing or mingling of articles of food which are whole- some and nutritious, and the sale thereof, cannot be made crimi- nal by the Legislature.” In Helena vy. Dwyer (Ark.), 39 Lawyers’ Reports, Annotated, 266, the court held that “an ordinance making it unlawful to sell fresh pork or sausage made thereof between June 1st and October is unreasonable and void, since it violates the inalienable right of man to procure food.” In deciding the case the court used this language, p. 268: “ Fresh pork is an article of food for general consumption, and when sound, and free from disease, is useful and nutritious. Like all other food, it may become unwholesome when eaten to excess. The quantity eaten, under ordinary circumstances, produces the sickness when it proves unwholesome. Any food is calculated to produce that effect when eaten in the same man- ner. The mere sale of it is not detrimental to the public health. The fact that individuals may be made sick by it when impru- dently eaten does not justify a city council in prohibiting the sale of it. For the same reason it could prohibit the sale of any or all other food. The most delicious food—that which is most liable to be eaten to excess—would be subject to interdiction. If it be conceded that the city council may prohibit the sale of any article of food, the wrongful use of which will or may injure the health of the consumer, then they can prescribe what the citizen of the city shall eat by prohibiting the sale of all other food. The Legislature or any of its creatures has no such power. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 87 The exercise of such power, as we have seen, would be a viola- tion of the inalienable right of man to procure healthy and nutritious food, by which life may be preserved and enjoyed. It would be an interference with the liberty of the citizen, which is not necessary to the protection of others or the public health— would be an invasion of his personal rights.” In People ex rel. Moxley v. Pease, 30 Chicago Legal News, 277, the Superior Court held: “The Legislature may make laws for the protection of the public health, good order, good morals and the safety of society, and may pass any reasonable regulations for the manufacture and sale of both butter and butterine, but it was not the right or power to pass unreasonable or unjust regulations or pro- hibitory laws as to either. It cannot prohibit the manufacture or sale of wholesome or nutritious articles of food either directly or under the guise of regulatory acts. Wherever it appears in the act itself or aliunde that the object, purpose, or intent of the act is to prohibit the manufacture or sale of wholesome articles of food and not to regulate their manufacture or sale in the in- terest of the public, we hold the act in question to be invalid.” In People of the State of New York v. Buffalo Fish Company, 30 Misce., 130, an action was brought to recover penalties under pro- visions of the Fisheries, Game and Forest Laws. Upon de- murrer the constitutionality of that act was raised. The act under question made it a misdemeanor for any person to possess, aud imposed a penalty for possessing, during certain seasons of the year, any of certain fresh water fish. It was held at Special Term to be unconstitutional as it was not limited to fish in a decayed or injurious physical condition. The court said, among other things, page 138: “Tt is conceded, of course, that if these fish were diseased, or had remained exposed to the elements until they were unfit for food, and constituted a menace to the public health, the State would have the right to interpose its police powers, and prevent the sale.” The Appellate Division in affirming this case adopted the 88 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE opinion of Judge Lambert at Special Term as its own (45 App. Div., 631), and this case has since been affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 164 N. Y., 93. The athorities relied upon by plaintiff are not in point. In the court below plaintiff relied upon the cases of People v. Cipperly, 101 N. Y., 634, 87 Hun, 324, and People v. Girard, 145. INT eh05 These cases are very clearly distinguishable, as is pointed out in the opinion of the learned justice at Special Term (fols. 30 to 35) and in the opinion of the learned Appellate Division (fols. 57 et seq). The statute in question is not necessary to prevent adultera- tion or the introduction of unwholesome or harmful matter into dairy products, as these are already prohibited by a different statute. ‘Section 22 of the Agricultural Law (last amended by chapter 101 of the Laws of 1900), provides as follows: “ Prohibition of the sale of adulterated milk.—No person shall sell or exchange, or offer or expose for sale or exchange, any unclean, impure, unhealthy, adulterated, or unwholesome milk or any cream from the same, or any unclean, impure, unhealthy,, adulterated, colored, or unwholesome cream, or sell or exchange or offer or expose for sale or exchange any article of food made from such milk or cream or manufacture, from any such milk or cream any article of food.” This statute is certainly sufficient to protect the health of the public, and the Attorney-General has instituted a large number of proceedings for alleged violation of this statute by the intro- duction into dairy products of preservatives which were claimed by him to be harmful. If the preservative used by the defend- ant in the case at bar were harmful, he could be proceeded against for violation of the provisions of section 22 of the Agri- cultural Law, under which an issue of fact would be raised whether the preservative used by defendant as a matter of fact is harmful or not. See People v. Hills, App. Div. 4th Dept., decision rendered October, 1901. CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 89 In view of the existence of a provision of law prohibiting adulteration and the introduction of unwholesome or adulter- ated substances into food and dairy products, it cannot be claimed that the statute under consideration in the case at bar was intended or necessary to prevent adulteration. Accordingly, it is respectfully submitted that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, be- cause section 27 of the Agricultural Law, in so far as it prohibits the use of preservatives, is unconstitutional. In ANSWER TO APPELLANT’S BRIEF. There are but few portions of the appellant’s brief which call for any answer or remark from respondent. These few will now be considered. (a.) On pages 11 and 12 the plaintiff’s counsel going entirely outside of anything on the record, makes the astounding asser- tion that all preservatives are harmful, and that the particular preservative sold by the defendant contains formaldehyde, “which is the chief element in the embalming liquid used by undertakers.” The resort to this entirely unworthy clap-trap and specious artifice will not assist plaintiff. As matter of fact, plaintiff’s counsel knows very well that these statements are absolutely false and without foundation. He knows that Dr. Geisler, the chief expert chemist of the Department of Agriculture, who has had more to do with the examination of dairy products than any one connected with the Department of Agriculture, has testified in open court that formaldehyde, if inserted in dairy products, would not in the least be harmful. Dr. Geisler’s testimony to this effect was given in the case of Graeff against Wormser, tried in the Supreme court, Kings county, before Justice Dickey. The counsel further knows that “ Preservaline ” has been ex- amined and tested by a large number of scientists and by the boards of health of various cities in the Union and of foreign countries, and that all who have examined it have been uniform in its praise; among others, may be mentioned Dr. Randall, 90 NintHo ANNUAL REPORT OF THE health officer, Augusta, Maine, whose report is most laudatory; so is the report made in Kansas City, October, 1899, by Drs. Froehling, Kuhn and Moechel, based upon minute physiological tests with a large number of patients who had taken milk con- taining “ Preservaline.” The most eminent scientists of Eng- land and Germany have also reported that the use of formalde- hyde or of “ Preservaline” in dairy products far from being harmful, was, on the contrary, extremely beneficial. Indeed, “ Preservaline,” for the sale of which the defendant is being prosecuted, has been in general use since 1877, when it was first introduced, and during that time it has uniformly increased the health and comfort of the community which used it. At any rate the court cannot take any judicial notice of state- ments such as made on pages 11 and 12 of the appellate’s brief, which are not contained in the complaint, and for which no other sanction is offered than the bald assertion of counsel for appellant, who, while not a chemist or physician, was a mem- ber of the Legislature that enacted the law which the Special Term and unanimous Appellate Division have declared to be un- constitutional. (b.) The appellant states that (Brief, p. 13) we would have the statute read: “ No person shall sell any dairy product contain- ing a harmful preservative.” Why should he object to such a statute? A similar one is in force in this State, and has been for a large number of years, to wit: Section 22 of the Agricul- tural Law. This section prohibits the sale of any unclean, im- pure, unhealthy, adulterated or unwholesome milk or cream. If the product sold by the defendant be unwholesome, or if milk containing it be injurious, he can be prosecuted under this sec- tion of the law. It may be well to add for the information of the court that a number of actions have been brought by the State under this section to recover penalties for the use of “ pre- servaline,” but in no instance has any jury found that * preserva- line ” was unwholesome or harmful. (c.) With regard to the case of People v. Cipperly, 837 Hun, 321 (101 N. Y., 684), we have discussed it in another portion of our COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 9ST brief, and it is fully discussed in the opinions of the Special Term and the Appellate Division. The reference to that portion of section 13 of the old law cited, on the middle of page 16 of the appellant’s brief as having been passed upon by the court in the Cipperly case, is entirely misleading. The court never passed on that portion of the law at all, but only upon the portion cited on page 15 of the appellant’s brief. (d.) The fact that section 36 of the Agricultural Law, which was enacted long prior to the act under consideration herein, states that every section of the Agricultural Law was enacted to prevent deception and for preserving the public health, upon which apparently some stress is laid at pages 7 and 18 of the appellant’s brief, is not conclusive upon the question whether as a matter of fact section 27 is a health law and enacted to pre- vent fraud. On the contrary, the court must determine that from the statute itself, and no mere say-so of the Legislature in another portion of the law enacted prior to section 27 can relieve the court from this duty. (e.) The argument that this statute was enacted to prevent fraud is entirely without force. The appellant concedes that the statute cannot constitutionally prohibit the sale of matzoon, sparklets, kumyss and other substances (Appellant’s Brief, pages 18-19), but seems to contend that the act does prohibit merely the sale of milk containing a preservative “as milk,” and ap- parently he seeks to convince the court that the defendant sold this preservative with the intention that the purchaser should mix it with milk and sell the mixture “as milk.” Such an argu- ment is its own refutation. The defendant does not care under ’ what name the purchaser from him sells “ preservaline ” or milk containing “ preservaline.” He does not care whether it is sold under the name of kumyss or any other name. All he cares about is to sell “ preservaline.” Under the appellant’s own reasoning the judgment must be affirmed because the complaint fails to allege that the defendant intended the purchaser to mix the preservative with milk and to sell it “as milk.” Non constat, but that he intended the pur- 92 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE chaser to sell it as kumyss, and under the plaintiff’s own admis- sion (pages 18-19), such a sale could not be constitutionally pro- hibited. | SECOND POINT. _THE CoMPLAINT Dons Nor State Facts SUFFICIENT TO CONSTI- TUTE A CAUSE OF ACTION, BECAUSE SECTION 37 OF THE AGRI- CULTURAL Law, WHICH PRESORIBES THE PENALTY FOR VIOLA- TION, IF CAPABLD OF CONSTRUCTION AT ALL, Must BE Con- STRUED TO AUTHORIZE A CRIMINAL But Nor a Civit ACTION. The Agricultural Law is divided into six articles, the first of which is entitled “ General Provisions,” and contains sections 1 to 12; the second in entitled “ Dairy Products,” and contains sections 20 to 37; the third is entitled “ Adulterated Vinegar ” and contains sections 50 to 58, and the other articles are respec- tively entitled “ Diseases of Domestic Animals,” “ Miscellaneous Provisions ” and “ Laws Repealed.” Section 37 of article II as originally enacted (Ll. 1893, ch. 338) provided as follows: “ Every person violating any of the provisions of this article shall forfeit to The People of the State of New York the sum of $100 for every such violation.” There was no provision making a violation of these provisions punishable as a misdemeanor. It will be noticed that at this time the penalty was made uni- form for each violation. At the end of article III there was a similar provision (section 53), fixing penalties for violations of provisions of that article and there was a similar one in article IV (section 66). Section 37 of the Agricultural Law remained unchanged until 1897, when it was amended by chapter 554 of the laws of that year. This act entirely changed the law. It amended section 37 to read as follows: “ Every person violating any of the provisions of this article shall forfeit to the People of the State of New York the sum of not exceeding one hundred dollars for every such violation.” COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 93 The section then went on to state that when the violation consisted of the manufacture or production, every day should be deemed a separate violation of the provisions of the article, and there was a similar provision where the violation consisted of the sale, or offering or exposing for sale. At the end of the ‘game section this provision was added: “ Whoever by himself or another violates any of the pro- visions of article two of said chapter shall be guilty of a mis- demeanor, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars, nor more than two hundred dollars, or by imprisonment of not less than one month nor more than six months or by both such fine and imprisonment, for the first offense; and by six months’ imprisonment for the second offense.” Both of the above quoted clauses merely govern violations of article II and for the first time in any portion of the Agricul- tural Law was there a provision inserted making violation of that law a criminal offense. What was the intention of the Legislature? Was it to make a single violation punishable by both a civil and a criminal action? Was it the intention of the Legislature to enable the State after recovery in a civil action of the full penalty to ob- tain a second recovery for the maximum penalty prescribed? Obviously not. Such a construction would have been incon- sistent with the first clause, which said that a person violating the same should forfeit a sum not exceeding one hundred dol- lars. Besides there is no language in the act providing that there shall be two causes of action, and that the provisions shall be deemed separate and cumulative. On the contrary the intention of the Legislature seems clear. It was intended to make a violation of the provisions of article II a criminal offence. It was intended to transfer jurisdiction from the civil to the criminal courts, and the penalty prescribed in the first clause of the section is the penalty which may be recovered in the criminal proceedings. In other words, the statute means that where the defendant violates any provision of article II he shall forfeit to the people a sum of money which O4 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE may be imposed upon him as a fine in a criminal proceeding, -and that he may be additionally punished by imprisonment. (We shall hereafter discuss the effect of the difference in amount specified in the first and last clauses of section 37). The conten- tion now urged by the learned counsel for the people that it was intended to give the State two causes of action for the same’ offense, finds support neither in the language of the statute nor in reason. Counsel for the defendant, after diligent search, has failed to find any statute anywhere granting two causes of action of this kind without the use of some words to designate clearly that one shall be additional to the other. As hereinafter pointed ‘out, moreover, a double recovery, such as that to which it is claimed the people are entitled, would be violative of the con- stitutional inhibition against putting a defendant twice in jeopardy. Before considering this provision, however, let us examine the subsequent changes of the law which emphasize the correctness of our construction of section 37. Chapter 558 of the Laws of 1898, again amended section 37, and changed it to read as follows: _ “ Every person violating any of the provisions of articles two and three shall forfeit to the People of the State of New York a sum not less than twenty-five dollars nor more than one hun- dred dollars for every such violation. * * * Whoever by himself or another violates any of the provisions of articles two and three of said chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars nor more than two hundred dollars, or by imprisonment.” It is to be noted that although by the Laws of 1898 this sec- tion was apparently made to cover violations of article III, the Legislature permitted section 55 of the Agricultural Law, which placed a fixed penalty of one hundred dollars for every violation of article III, to remain unchanged. Thus, according to section 37 a violation of article III was punishable by a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars and not more than one hundred dollars, whereas by section 53 a fixed COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 95 penalty of one hundred dollars would have to be inflicted, and there was no authorization for a penalty of less amount. Again it is to be noted that by the amendment of 1898 viola- tions of article III were made criminal. It is important to note that by this amendment of section 37, and by every amendment subsequent thereto, the first clause providing merely for a for- feiture to the State, and the last clause providing that such vio- lation should be held a misdemeanor, are kept co-relative and changed simultaneously. Thus by the Laws of 1898, chapter 358, where first clause stated that a violation of articles II and III should involve a for- feiture, the last clause of section 37 provided that violation of articles II and III should make the defendant liable to convic- tion for a misdemeanor. Chapter 435 of the Laws of 1899 added sections 91 and 92 of the Agricultural Law to the inhibition of section 37. As amended by chapter 435 of Laws of 1899, the first sentence of section 37 provided that a violation of sections 91 and 92 should cause forfeiture to the People of the State of New York of the sum of money specified, and the last sentence of section 37 that the violation of sections 91 and 92 should be a misdemeanor and punishable by the fine specified and by imprisonment. Violations of sections 91 and 92 were theretofore not punish- cable at all. : The same act also provided for a forfeiture in case of violation of chapter 491 of the Laws of 1898 (as to sale and transporta- tion of calves), but did not make said offense criminal. Chapter 76 of the Laws of 1900, and chapter 559 of the Laws of 1900, which amended section 37 of the Agricultural Law, made no substantial change. Indeed, the law as it existed at the time of the violation for which the present action is brought, was substantially the same as after the amendment of 1897, but the subsequent acts show that it was the intention of the Legis- lature to make these violations punishable criminally instead of civilly. 96 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE The reason why the fine provided for in the last sentence of section 37 declaring a violation a misdemeanor was larger than the fine provided for in the first sentence, is that the first clause is expressly limited to the fine for each violation; thereafter there is a clause stating that the same act may constitute two or more violations, as, for instance, the manufacture or the sale or exposure for sale for several consecutive days. All of these can be covered in one criminal action, for each of which viola- tions, however, no greater financial penalty can be imposed than the amount prescribed by the first sentence of section 37. That it was the intention of the Legislature to make the vio- lations punishable criminally, and not civilly, is further demon- strated by the fact that there is no provision as to who should fix the amount of the penalty. That is no unintentional omission for the universal rule in criminal actions as laid down by section 12 of the Penal Code is that the penalty in such actions is to be fixed by the court. As to civil actions there is no such provision. If the court should construe the section as authorizing civil actions, section 37 would be entirely ineffective, because there is no machinery of law provided to fix this penalty. There is nothing authorizing either the court or the jury to do so. In this respect the act would be entirely defective and void, because incomplete and unenforcible. Finally, it is to be noted that by the amendment of 1901, chap- ter 656, the Legislature has provided the same penalty in the first clause as in the last, and has again made a similar change in the first as in the last amendment, showing clearly that it was the intention to make these two portions of the same section co-relative, and to have the first clause prescribe the penalty which might be recovered by the criminal action provided for by the last. No claim can be made by the learned counsel for the people that section 37 authorizes the people to maintain but one action and to elect whether such action shall be a criminal or a penal one. There is nothing in the act which states that one action COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 97 should be a bar to the other, or that the people may elect be- tween them. The act either grants but one cause of action or it grants two. If it grants one, that one, is the criminal proceeding. If section 37 be construed as granting two causes of action, one a civil and the other a criminal one, it would grant causes of action in violation of the constitutional inhibition against putting the defendant twice in jeopardy. The fifth amendment of the Federal Constitution is as follows: “rials for crimes; twice in jeopardy; private property for public use.—No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime unless on a presentation or indictment of a grand jury, * * * nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb * * * p27 Article I, section 6 of the New York State Constitution pro- vides as follows: “ Bill of Rights—* * * No person shall be subject to be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.” It is to be noted at the outset that the provision of the State Constitution is much broader than that of the Federal Constitu- tion. The Federal Constitution limits it to jeopardy of life and limb. The State Constitution contains no such limitation. However, it was from the earliest times held that in construing the provision of the Federal Constitution, the court should be guided by the spirit rather than by the letter of the law, and apply the constitutional provision not only to the felonies but to all indictable offences, including misdemeanors.—E«@ parte Lange, 18 Wallace, U. S., 163; Berkowitz v. United States, 93 Fed. Rep., 452. It has further been held by the Federal courts that an action to recover a statutory penalty, though civil in form, is in reality a criminal case.—Lees v. United States, 150 U. S., 476; Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S., 616. And the courts, following the decisions holding that misde- meanors are within the constitutional provision, have held that 7 98 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THR actions to recover statutory penalties are also within the guarantee against double jeopardy.—Coffey v. l’nited States, 116 U. S., 486; United States v. McKee, 4 Dillon, U. S., 128; United States v. Shapleigh, 12 U. S. App., 26. Until the passage of the fourteenth amendment to the Federal Constitution it was well settled that the provision prohibiting double jeopardy does not bind the States but applies only to offenses against and trials under the laws of the United States (Barron vy. Baltimore, Peters U. S., 248; Fox v. Ohio, 5 How. U. S., 410), although the early authorities expressed a contrary opinion.—See People v. Goodwin, 18 Johnson, N. Y., 187. The same has been held with regard to each of the first ten amendments of the Federal Constitution, which are commonly known as the Federal Bill of Rights. While the legal effect of the amendment in the sphere of the State Government was thus denied, the Federal Bill of Rights were held in a number of authorities to have at least a moral force even there.—James v. The Commonwealth, 12 8. & R. (Pa.), 235; Campbell v. The State, 11 Ga., 353. However, by the fourteenth amendment to the Federal Consti- tution the first ten amendments have been made to operate upon the States. This question was first raised in Spies v. Illinois, 123 U.S. 131, and In re Kemmler, 1386 U.S. 486; but in those cases it was not decided. In O'Neill vy. Vermont, 144 U. 8. 323, the majority of the court held that the question was not properly raised, to authorize the court to pass apon it. The minority, however, held that the question was properly raised, and that the fourteenth amend- ment did render the prior amendments applicable to the States. See opinion of Mr. Justice Fipxip, at p. 363, and Mr. Justice Haran, at p. 370, to which it is unnecessary to add anything. New YorkK AUTHORITIES IN AccorD WITH THE FEDERAL CASES. The authorities in New York State, which may be claimed to hold that separate and independent statutes may constitu- COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 99 tionally authorize the infliction of a penalty to be recovered in a civil action and of punishment to be inflicted in a criminal court, are readily distinguishable. People v. Stevens, 13 Wend., 341, was decided in 1835. In that case (p. 342) the Legislature specifically declared that the viola- tion should not only be punishable by the infliction of a penalty, but should also be deemed a misdemeanor and punishable by fine andimprisonment. In that case the penalty to be recovered in a civil action and the criminal prosecution were not authorized by one and the same statute or section of the law. Finally the statutes there under consideration were enacted prior to the Constitution of 1821, which first contained the prohibition against double jeopardy. In Rollins v. Breed, 54 Hun, 485, the statute specifically said that there might be both causes of action—one in favor of any individual who might sue, and the criminal action in favor of the people. The court on this ground alone distinguished the case from the Federal authorities cited heretofore in our brief, which decisions they apparently approved of and reconciled with the case then before the court on the ground that the govern- ment cannot maintain two causes of action. The opinion says of the McKee case, 4 Dillon, 128: “The McKee case differs somewhat from the present one. There were two separate statutes, each furnishing a complete remedy for the charge. The government chose to enforce one, and it might be well said that a conviction and punishment under that ended the right of the government.” It may be noted that the same distinction was applied in the Federal Courts in the case of Stone v. United States, 167 U. S., 178. In People v. Meekim, 183 N. Y., 214, the matter was referred to merely by way of dictum. The prior action in that case more- over was not a mere civil action to recover a penalty, but a mandamus to remove a public officer, and was held to be not in the nature of a criminal action. Even if these authorities were irreconcilable with those of 100 Ninro ANNUAL REPORT OF THE the Federal Courts, which, as we bave shown, they are not, this court is bound, since the adoption of the Fourteenth Amend- ment to the Federal Constitution, to follow the decisions of the Federal Courts, but in view of the fact that all of the New York authorities seemingly against our contention are readily dis- tinguishable, it is submitted that the court should certainly follow the spirit of the law and of the constitutional provision which would prohibit two such actions from being maintained. In any event the statute should be construed in the spirit of the Federal Constitution. It is, therefore, respectfully submitted that section 37 of the Agricultural Law should be construed to authorize a criminal but not a civil action, and that accordingly the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. From the foregoing discussion it follows that the judgment below should be affirmed, with costs to the respondent. New York, October 29, 1901. HOADLY, LAUTERBACH & JOHNSON, Attorneys for Respondent. Of Counsel, EDWARD LAUTERBACH, Henry L. SCHEUERMAN, Herpyrt R. LIMBURGER. The Court of Appeals rendered judgment for defendant, the opinion of that court being rendered by Mr. Justice Cullen, as follows: CuLLEN, J. This action is brought to recover a penalty for the violation of section 27 of the Agricultural Law, as amended by chapter 534 of the Laws of 1900. The provisions of that section which it is alleged the defendant violated, are as follows: ‘“ No person shall sell, offer or expose for sale any butter or other dairy products containing a preservative but this shall not be construed to prohibit the use of salt in butter or cheese or spir- ituous liquors in club or other fancy cheese or sugar in con- COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 101 densed milk. No person or persons, firm, association or cor- poration shall induce or attempt to induce any person or per- sons to violate any of the provisions of the Agricultural Law. Any person, firm, association or corporation selling, offering or advertising for sale any substance, preparation or matter for use in violation of the provisions of the Agricultural Law shall be guilty of a violation of this act.” The complaint merely fol- lows the statutes, and alleges that the defendant advertised for sale a preservative called “ preservaline ” for use with butter, “ which was neither salt to be used in butter and cheese, sugar to be used in milk nor liquor to be used in club or fancy cheese,” with intent that the said preservative should be used in butter to be offered and exposed for sale. The defendant demurred to the complaint, claiming that the statutory enactment quoted was unconstitutional and void, and in this contention he has been upheld by the Special Term and the Appellate Division. We think the disposition of this case by the courts below was correct. It is not possible to define accurately the limits of the police power, the exercise of which is vested in the Legislature, nor have the courts, as a rule, essayed that task further than to state in very general terms the nature and object of such power. Still the power has its limitations and those limitations have been to a large extent determined by the process of exclu- sion and inclusion, as the courts have upheld particular cases of legislation as valid exercises of the power and in other cases have declared the legislation void. In People v. Mara (99 N. Y. 377) a statute absolutely prohibiting the manufacture and sale of oleomargarine or any compound as a substitute for butter and cheese was held void. The statute having been subse- quently amended so as to prohibit the manufacture or sale of any article so compounded as to imitate butter was upheld in People v. Arensberg (105 N. Y. 123) as valid legislation to prevent fraud on purchasers and consumers. In People v. Kilber (106 N. Y. 321) a statute defining what should be deemed unwhole- some or adulterated milk and prohibiting its sale was held con- stitutional. In People v. Girard (145 N. Y. 105) a statute for- 102 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE bidding the manufacture or sale of vinegar containing any arti- ficial coloring matter was also held valid. From these cases the following propositions may be deduced: 1. That the Legislature cannot forbid or wholly prevent the sale of a wholesome article of food. 2. That legislation intended and reasonably adapted to prevent an article being manufactured in imitation or semblance of a well-known article in common use and thus imposing upon consumers or purchasers is valid. 3. That in the interest of public health the Legislature may de- clare articles of food not complying with a specified standard unwholesome and forbid their sale. Though these principles, like most legal principles, are true only within limits, there would not seem much chance of conflict in their practical application except between the first and last. In the first of the milk cases (People v. Cipperly, 101 N. Y. 634, decided upon opinion of LEARNED, P. J., in 37 Hun, 319) it was held that the statutory declaration of what was wholesome milk was conclusive, and the defendant was not allowed to show in defense that the milk sold by him was in fact unadulterated and not unwhole- some. The first oleomargarine case can be differentiated from this on the ground that the statute forbade its sale as a sub- stitute to take the place of butter and not as an unwholesome article of food. Still that distinction is narrow and I imagine that the sale and consumption of a well-known article of food or a product conclusively shown to be wholesome could not be forbidden by the Legislature even though it assumed to enact the law in the interest of public health. The limits of the police power must necessarily depend in many instances on the common knowledge of the times. An enactment of a standard of purity of an article of food, failing to comply with which the sale of the article is illegal, to be valid must be within reason- able limits and not of such a character as to practically pro- hibit the manufacture or sale of that which as a matter of common knowledge is good and wholesome. The statute before us cannot be justified as an exercise of power to prevent fraud or imposition on buyers and the con- COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 103 sumers. Doubtless the Legislature could provide that where butter contains any preservative except salt or sugar the pack- age should be clearly marked with a label stating such fact, and it might require any notice adapted to informing the public of the nature and treatment of the article offered for sale. This it has not done, but it has absolutely forbidden the sale. Nor is the legislation similar to that before the court in the vinegar ease. In that case there was no prohibition of vinegar produced from other materials than cider. The forbidden thing was the use of artificial coloring matter, which was not a necessary ingredient of the article produced, but served the sole purpose of preventing the consumer distinguishing between the differ- ent kinds of vinegar. In the present case the object of the forbidden article used is not to practice any deception, but to prevent decay in a product which, without the presence of some foreign substance, naturally becomes unfit for use in a very short period. The effect therefore of the statute is to pro- hibit the preservation of dairy products except by salt in butter and cheese and sugar in condensed milk, and their sale, no mat- ter how harmless the ingredients used for that purpose may be, and no matter how efficiently they attain their purpose. It is sought, however, to uphold this statute under the prin- ciple of the milk cases on the theory that it is a legislative determination that preservatives other than salt and sugar are unwholesome adulterations of dairy products. As pointed out by the learned courts below, there is no legislative declaration to that effect. Passing, however, that consideration, there is a more serious difficulty in the way of such a course. If the stat- ute had provided that the admixture of any substance with dairy products other than salt or sugar should be deemed an adulteration, and declared such dairy products when so adul- terated unwholesome, the case would resemble the milk case, and the question would be presented whether such far-reaching restrictions could be upheld as reasonable regulations in favor of public health. As to that question we express no opinion. But this provision of the statute is not aimed at adulterations. 104 Ninta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE I cannot find in the Agricultural Law any general prohibition against adulterations in butter and cheese, although there is an express provision to that effect in the case of milk. Section 26 seems to forbid the use of acids or other deleterious sub- stance only in the case of imitation butter. Though if I err in this and the application of the section be general, the provision under review is unnecessary so far as public health is involved. Section 407 of the Penal Code forbids the sale of adulterated food only (except in certain specified cases) when made without disclosing or informing the purchaser of the adulteration. It will be seen, therefore, that the sale of adulterated butter or cheese is not necessarily an offense, except so far as made such by the statutory enactment under review. That enactment does not make the introduction of a foreign substance an adultera- tion, nor an adulteration illegal, except in the case of a preservy- ative. How, then, can it be said that the statute is intended to prevent adulteration or the introduction of foreign substance into butter or cheese when the sole test of criminality under it is that the substance is introduced for the object or with the effect of preserving butter or cheese? If the foreign substance has not this effect, no matter how deleterious it may be, the use of it does not violate this provision. It is plain, therefore, that this statute is solely aimed at the preservation of dairy prod- ucts by the use of other substances than salt, sugar and spirit- uous liquor. Why the use of salt is forbidden in milk, sugar in butter and cheese, and particularly why that of liquor is per- mitted in club or fancy cheese and forbidden in other cheese it is difficult to understand on the theory that its object was the protection of the public health. The preservation of food and the arrest of its tendency to decay is certainly a proper and law- ful object in itself. It is a work in which man has been engaged to some extent from earliest history. It is the subject of large industries in this country, and the products of those industries are generally used by the community and are lawful objects of manufacture and sale. The industry has grown to an enor- mous extent. These are matters of common knowledge. There COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 105 is doubtless in the prosecution of these industries danger of adulteration and of the use of processes injurious to public health. The regulation of these subjects for the protection of the public health and the prevention of imposition on consum- ers is within the power of the Legislature, and the propriety of its exercise cannot be questioned. But while it may regu- late, the Legislature may not destroy the industry, and that is not a valid regulation which in dealing with the means of pre- serving food makes the preservation of food itself an unlawful act. Ingredients and processes may be prohibited as unwhole- some or causing deception, but not solely because they preserve. The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. ParxKeER, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Hatcut, LANDON and WERNER, JJ., concur. Judgment affirmed. This law, so far as it applies to selling preservatives as such, was declared unconstitutional, because it did not confine its pro- hibitions to unhealthful and unwholesome preservatives. Phy- Sicians who ought to be competent to speak upon this subject. stated to me that, in their judgment, quite a percentage of infant mortality was due in times past to the use of preservatives. I would, therefore, respectfully recommend to your honorable body that the statute above declared unconstitutional be amended by prohibiting the sale of such preservatives as may be detrimental to health, or else a statute in which shall be specifically named those particular preservatives that are detri- mental to health and their use in such food products. VINEGAR. The Assistant Commissioners in the different divisions in the State have been instructed to exercise vigilance continuously relative to violations of this portion of the Agricultural Law. In doing this work a peculiar condition has been discovered rel- ative to some of the vinegars placed upon the market. It was found to contain sufficient amount of acetic acid and the re- quired amount of solids, but was declared by the chemists not 106 Nintao ANNUAL REPORT OF THB to be pure cider vinegar and it was sold as and for such. After due consideration of this matter warning was given to the dif- ferent manufacturers that if they were adulterating this vine- gar it must be stopped. Cases were subsequently made for its sale and they were referred to the Attorney-General for prose- cution. One of the cases is now being tried in the Supreme Court in which our evidence shows: First. That the vinegar was not pure cider vinegar. Second. That it was made of refuse material. Third. It was artificially colored. This question is still pending. With the exception of this particular class of vinegar the law is being generally observed throughout the State, and the vinegar is generally pure and what it purports to be. The following cases have been referred to the Attorney- General during the year for violation of the Vinegar Law, viz.: October 5, 1900. Aprél $, 1901. CasE No. CAsE No. People v. Hazard & Co.........sseeeee- 2457) People tv. \Gillott (352 .9< slo eebeiaciesieis 2460 IPEOPLOLV eS OCHIAI acter sisiaiclsisicteisin\elejele/alsie 2624 People v. Reiss & Brady.......... 2472, 929 People v. Kummer 2 ......... cc cwcc cc csc 2626 == PPEOD1 OjsVa LOY, Cla raise inialsiviointersisieieiaiatole)sis'sic.e1e 2456 May 9, 1901. ——— People vy. Weppner C0..2..2.ccsccsvcces 2291 November &, 1900. — People V. Mock ......-sssececcceeereeee 2277 May 28, 1901. People v. Parker........ 2278, 2279, 2280 2284 People v. Davis .....s.seceseeeeeeeceees 2473 2285, 2287, 2288 pede inal July 22, 1901. People v. Laie or ae ent eDS gag 1 CORP Ti) PRNNeS eee ry ares oy November 28, 1900. September 17, 1901. Peopletv.. Uneeria. cee tense ten toee 1154 People v. Coan & Co.............-... 3210 People v. Maurer ......eeceees ABGOCRORE 1155 People v. Thalmeimer ................. 3202 eo) People.) Nettleyh.--oonreen eae eee 3211 December 28, 1900. People v. Walrath & Co...........+..+- 3205 People. v, Maul #:ceapcccvescwcncssesnens 2089 People v. Tracy & C0.............++00- 3205 January 7, 1901. September 80, 1901. People v. Meinhold & Heinmann...... 931 People y. Granger & Co........... 2244, 2295 People v. Koerig & Shuester .......... 2468 2243, 2242 — People vy. Clark “A)jas exten ates sina eetaeriae 2241 March 2, 1901. People v. Niagara Fruit Co....... 2298, 22389 PSODlGe Vs LN COMN) tayectcniscicisie cis crs stetelcle sts 2904 2364, 2365, 2366, 2367, 2868, 2369, 2370 People ry. HLODUNIATA) (o's clclssielsivices's's c.c'eiel 2905 People v. Albion Cider & Vinegar Co. 718 People v. Hamilton & Richardson.... 2906 719, 2234, 2235, 2286, 2237, 2238, 2240, 2299 —— os COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 107 THE SO-CALLED “ BOB VEAL” LAW. By the provisions of chapter 491, Laws of 1898, your honor- able body provided as follows relative to the sale of calves in this State: § 71. No person shall slaughter, for the purpose of selling the same for food, or expose for sale or sell within this State, or bring or cause to be brought into any city, town or village _ within this State for food any calf or carcass of the same, or any part thereof except the hide, unless it is in good, healthy condition and was at least four weeks of age at the time of killing. Any person or persons duly authorized by the Commis- sioner of Agriculture, may examine any calf or veal found within this State offered or exposed for sale, or kept with intent to sell as food, and if such calf is under four weeks of age, or the veal is from a calf killed under four weeks of age, or from a calf in an unhealthy condition when so killed, he may seize the same and cause it to be destroyed or disposed of in such manner as to make it impossible to be thereafter used as food. § 72. On and after the passage of this Act it shall be unlaw- ful for any corporation, partnership, person or persons to ship to or from any part of this State any carcass or carcasses of a calf or calves or any’part of such carcass except the hide, unless they shall attach to every carcass or part thereof so shipped in a conspicuous place a tag, that shall stay thereon during such transportation, stating the name or names of the person or persons who raised the calf, the name of the shipper, the points of shipping and the destination and the age of the calf. § 73. On and after the passage of this act, no railroad com- pany, express company, steamboat company, or other common carrier, shall carry or receive for transportation any carcass or carcasses of calves, or any part of the same except the hide, unless the said carcass or carcasses or parts thereof shall be tagged as herein provided. § 2. This act shall take effect immediately. The peculiar way in which the traffic of veal carcasses is carried on within the State makes this law somewhat difficult of enforcement. However, in proceeding to enforce it we first ascertain the lines or channels of this trade, then place the agents upon these lines to watch the consignments to see whether they were or were not violations of the statute. I might here call the attention of your honorable body to the fact 108 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE that it was with some difficulty I was able to procure men to do ordinary agent work in this branch who were competent to determine, in the short space of time it was necessary for them to determine, whether or not the particular calf or carcass that was being offered for sale was or was not in violation of the statute: The particular method of operating, as above set forth, was supplemented by the further examination of the calves that were seized and declared to be under age, viz.: They were sent by express to the hospital of William H. Kelly, veterinary sur- geon, of this State, where they were subsequently examined by Dr. Kelly in conjunction with some other veterinarians in the employ of the Department, and portions of the calves condemned preserved in alcohol for use in court. The portions so preserved are the navel, navel cord and kidneys. I am informed that they indicate with more accuracy the probable age of the calf than any other portion of the carcass that can be taken. This evi- dence is vouched for by the veterinarians in our employ, and is approved by the Veterinary College at Cornell University. There were quite a few persons who made a business of collect- ing these smali calves and sending them to the market. A goodly number of them, however, upon the enactment of the law stopped the business, but there were some continued it in defiance and it made the work of the Department quite difficult from the fact that they entered into subterfuge, with their cun- ning to assist, to get carcasses to market without our knowl- edge, and to get them there in such a way that persons finding them would be unable to determine the consignor. When these subterfuges were being gradually but surely overcome, as though the thought had suddenly struck them at once, the con- signments were made to parties who were in the business in New York city, but made to them in Jersey City, thereby giving a chance to raise the question of interstate commerce in all the cases; i. e., to raise the question of our right to stop the goods in transit when the point of destination is outside the State. By carefully watching these consignments we were enabled ulti- mately to ascertain their destination within the State when COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 109 brought over on the ferries, and so have made cases against the parties receiving them and exposing them for sale. In one of the cases made by this Department which was tried at Norwich, Chenango county, on the thirtieth day of Septem- ber, 1901, the question was raised by the defendant’s attor- ney to the effect that the statute, chapter 491, Laws of 1898, was repealed by the provisions of chapter 321, Laws of 1901. It was reported to this office by the attorneys who had charge of the case for the people that the judge in considering the matter stated that the question of whether it was or was not repealed by the provisions of the above- named chapter was immaterial to the case at bar inasmuch as that case was made prior to the enactment of the said chapter 321, and the right of action was therefore preserved to the people. He therefore did not pass upon the question of whether chapter 321, Laws of 1901, repealed the provisions of chapter 491, Laws of 1898, but the judge expressed himself in- cidentaliy in discussing the question as believing that it was so repealed. The whole matter was therefore laid before the Attorney-General with the object in view of testing this ques- tion in the courts, or asking your honorable body to so amend the provisions of chapter 321, Laws of 1901, above referred to, as to re-enact the provisions of chapter 491, Laws of 1898, which, if they were repealed, were so repealed by inference and undoubtedly without intention. The wisdom of continuing pros- ecutions under this chapter until this question is settled may be debatable, but if the statute should be ultimately declared re- pealed and a great number of cases should be pending in which the defendants were to recover costs it would be expensive to the State. I would therefore suggest to your honorable body the re-enactment of the provisions of chapter 491, Laws of 1898, by amending chapter 321, Laws of 1901, by adding thereto those sections. This will end the controversy on the proposition as to whether the statutes are still in existence with, in my judg- ment, the least possible harm to all persons concerned. 110 Nintu ANNUAL REPORT OF THE The following cases have been reported to the Attorney-Gen- eral for prosecution under this law, viz.: October 1, 1900. People v. Kelly. People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People People Vv. Vv. Vv. November 21, 1900. Martin. . Eckler. November 27, 1900. . Holdredge. . Bresee. . Hook. November 28, 1900. . Sloat. December 1, 1900. . Carroll. December 8, 1900. . Schintzius. . Unger. December 10, 1900. . Cook. . Murray. . Jackson. December 17, 1900. . Allaird. . Welch. . Dean. December 27, 1900. Kemp. Carroll. Stilson. Stewart. Harby. Dean. . Tilton. January 7, 1901. . Bedell. January 14, 1901. . Snead. . Clark. January 18, 1901. . Dean. February 11, 1901. Golde. . Bartlett. . Russell Brothers. Harby. . Mackin. February 28, 1901. King. Mason. . Martin. . Reglis. March 21, 1901. Holdredge. Pike. Scott. People People People People People People Aut a ae People v. People v. People v. People People People People People People People People People People People People People People daddd44445454458 People People People People People People People aaaa428 People People People People People People 5 Males Ws Die People People People People People People People aaasa44 People v. People vy. People v. March 28, 1901. . Williams. Culver. Knapp. Huyck. . Walrath. . Bradley. April 4, 1901. Mowerson. Oliver & Co. Williams & Brothers. . Bingham & Co. . Williams. Dennis & Herring. . Allison & Co. Scheer. Hartman & Carson. . Richardson & Co. . Foley & Co. Steers & Menke. Adams Brothers. Moritz. Apple. . Frank & Co. . Joseph & Co. April 10, 1901. McFeely. Martin. Root. Campbell. . Shields. Zone. Brown. April 28, 1901. Perkins. Lally. Gilbert. Goddell. Ware. Wergand. April 26, 1901. Holdridge. Lewis. . Oliver & Co. Martins. Granata. Foley & Co. . Kensington. June 24, 1901. Steers & Menke. Dennis & Herring. July 11, 1901. Searls. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 10 LINSEED OIL. During the year a canvass of the different stores in the State where linseed oil was sold or exposed for sale has been made with considerable care by a special agent of this Department who was an expert relative to that commodity. Wherever the adulterated goods, or goods whose sale or exposure for sale would be in violation of the statute, were found, notice was given to the parties that its sale was a violation. A second visit was made to the place where these particular goods were found during the first visit, and if they were found in the store a second time samples were taken for analysis by the chemist. The following cases were made and referred to the Attorney- General for violation of the provisions of the Agricultural Law, as follows: April 2, 1901. CASE No. CASE NO. PECVD) Vin LAAT fala d iss cleave die cle cls wleieisieiee s 27 People v. McIntyre & Sons..............- 10 People v. Krueger & Co...........sses005 30 People) vis WCU py sivisincyers slavciers comrartisiens iste Sacre 9 People v. Sassman & Poholski .......... 29 Peoples ve SMUT i .sce. vetoes coaaeneaens 7 PSOE Um ES ATE TIL TV atelalajcreletate dialalais\ar c'elajeje(s'e,ci 26 People v. Bayne & Carpenter ........... 5 PGOUIe We KROCNCHCKE) ts. secre ectdelescelsce 16 Peoplerys HHOMAanNnG jcc serch toace conus 1 PEOp Cav A DIAN i aisc-aoicts sicietstelwiett: ists atwalers'e 14 People we shondagesck ..cdnceaccle tases eee 2, 31 PP CODIG MV AMV OLE: ta'slc onicic ac alcicnis\esiscicisin/a/ale'aicve 13 People Vi GeViNe: wesc cecceincccenensccesee 24 PEOple avs (GOLdOn eases: oe eek: Tasoee waves 12 Peoplejv:. Burts 2533 .. deco csecacdssiceee 21 IPCODIGh Ver TANKS 5 oc scciocuciece cocci scceeis cs i i = MAPLE SUGAR AND MAPLE SYRUP. No cases have been made during the year for violation of the provisions of this statute for the reason that if there is any violation we are unable to detect it at the present time. We have endeavored by detective work to ascertain whether the statute is being violated in places where maple sugar and maple Syrup are being either renovated, made over or manufactured from other substances. Our detective work has been up to the present time unavailing, and chemical knowledge within our reach is not sufficient to determine when maple sugar and maple syrup have been adulterated by the addition of sugar or syrup made from other commodities. Our chemists are doing what they can, however, as time will permit, to develop some means of determining such adulteration. Until this is done we cannot 112 Ninta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE prosecute any cases for the violation of the statute. I am of the opinion that it would not be unwise for your honorable body to make a small appropriation for experimenting along this and other lines of work with which this Department is charged, in which we are having similar difficulty with our chemical work. BEET SUGAR. During the past season, in accordance with the provisions made by your honorable body, the following men, viz., Parley M. Brown, John W. Calkins, George E. Hollenbeck, C. M. La Monte, D. W. Lasher, S. Niles Loomis and E. C. Montross, have been employed as instructors, whose duty it has been to go among the farmers of the State who were putting in crops of sugar beets for the first time to instruct them relative to the preparation of the soil, growing, caring for and harvesting the beets for the sugar-beet factories. These men have been em- ployed all the time they profitably could in this work. Just how to measure the results to determine whether they were beneficial or otherwise I am at a loss. There can hardly be doubt, however, but what this work has been of great help to those who were putting in first crops, entirely ignorant of its requirements, being a new industry within the State. There have been two beet-sugar factories in operation in the State during the present season—one at Binghamton, N. Y., known as the Binghamton Beet Sugar Company’s Factory, and the other at Lyons, N. Y., known as the Empire State Sugar Com- pany’s Factory. Reports from the men in the field show that in many cases the land selected for the growing of the beets was not appro- priate for the purpose and consequently showed a small yield. This had a tendency to make the average per acre smaller from the beets thus raised in the State of New York. During the year above mentioned there were produced by the two factories sugar as follows, viz.: The Binghamton Beet Sugar Factory, 2,500 tons, and the Empire State Sugar Factory, 2,000 tons, making in the aggregate the amount of sugar made by these — a eS COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 113 two factories in the year 1901, 4,500 tons, made from 47,000 tons of beets, averaging about 192 pounds of sugar to one ton of beets. Your honorable body appropriated by the provisions of chap- ter 331, Laws of 1901, $93,000 to be apportioned under the pro- visions of chapter 500, Laws of 1897, as a bounty, said distribu- tion to be made upon a base of not to exceed one cent per pound for the sugar manufactured coming within the requirements and provisions of said statute. Under that statute I have dis- tributed money as follows to the two factories above named, viz., to the Binghamton Beet Sugar Factory $48,350.95, and to the Empire State Sugar Factory, $42,347.03. SAN JOSE SCALE. During the year the agents of this Department have been actively engaged in examining the nurseries, as provided by the Agricultural law, relative to infectious or contagious diseases of fruit trees. As aresult of the examination of those nurseries the Department has issued in accordance with the provisions of the said statute 489 certificates to nurserymen on an inspection of 7,156% acres of nurseries and 294 acres of vineyards, as against 399 certificates on 6,0054 acres of nursery stock and 1,018 acres of vineyards in 1900. Seventy-six were certified for the first time this year, accounted for mostly by increase in business and partly by changes in firm names. Two hundred and thirty-five nurseries reported as embracing five acres or less, and 187 over five acres. One hundred and six nurserymen received ‘duplicate certificates to file with authorities in other States as follows: Pennsylvania, 2; Georgia, 39; Illinois, 20; Indi- ana, 15; Iowa, 28; Maryland, 76; Michigan, 82; New Jersey, 15; North Carolina, 51; Ohio, 88; Virginia, 71; Florida, 2; total, 489. After August Ist duplicate certificates were supplied only for Georgia, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia, the only States having laws and regulations requiring the filing of copies of original certificates. 8 114 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THB It has been the invariable rule in the inspection of nurseries to destroy every tree or plant on which the San José Scale was found, together with adjoining trees. Infested orchard trees in proximity to nursery stock are condemned and burned, and the Department has required all nurserymen to fumigate stock dug for shipping from blocks or fields in which scale has been found. Two, three or more inspections were made of nurseries where it was known that the scale had been found in the vicin- ity, and every such place has been throughout the summer un- der the care of an inspector, aided in every instance by the owner. It is the intention of the Department that its certifi- cates shall be entirely reliable, and that they are so is shown in that out of the shipment of millions of trees and plants from this State in 1901, only one case of scale was reported back to the Department as having been sent out by a nurseryman hold- ing certificate, and that was traced to an old, transplanted block, where the inspection was made in July—before the breed- ing season of the scale. There are now twenty-three houses specially prepared for the fumigation of nursery stock by the New York State nurserymen, and some growers fumigate a whole or a part of the stock they handle; some fumigating all stock shipped, notwithstanding the fact that no scale has ever been found on their premises. Following is an estimate of the varieties and number of trees growing in New York nurseries in 1900-1901 (figures never be- fore collected), as reported by inspectors, from information ob- tained at the time of inspection, giving a very fair idea of the extent and growth of the nursery business in this State: 1900. 1901. PRINS? 0515. seteisle SUR Deis Hee 8,830,217 10,258,166 Peate tte ety FS inte eke Uae 4,755,133 6,162,537 Pear, WANE... oer cts tae cate TR AN oP oleh 439,713 PU he tick, isin wit isis Vind Wakes AE ee 4,495,122 5,651,289 COREE he in ciniadds sekhaehant 3,955,892 5,532,815 PPGHUE ik SN oe ve ep eb ore 2,823,363 3,473,297 Qimneeng ihe Acces. A 718,565 587,966 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 115 1900. 1901. MTEC ONE ooh hat ciate shot said <2 oi «hehe si es 77,016 56,821 Ornamental, LES. ciec. ei. 4 ijc00 3 ois 3,521,606 2,163,670 PUMSMIS ea Tel ahs spol is hive Gis ata, stats 4,815,868 5,488,076 PE MUTE Sig raise ayia a1s. 3 bis dc ati t tials» 4,263,224 3,438,834 Re Saat ch Dah ade 2 ere ik 2 2 a 11,795,139 21,433,966 GE OOSEDEEEICS eyes) < ozs ib Scie S aie 80,188 626,710 EAABDCTTICN: ACCS)... is). s/o 'a « 234 2133 PAC RDCLTICH SACLES. 1010/2) dein aslo « 80 1114 Strawberries, acres ............. 188 159 NiBeyards, ACTES jj: 5 aie mxties o eestes 5 11 Vineyaris: ACRES... ort ei bal sje soit we: 1,663 5944 The total number of trees inspected in 1900 was 399,271, and in 1901, 852,633. The law requires transportation companies doing business in the State to notify the Commissioner of Agriculture of the receipt of nursery stock from points without the State to points within the State. We have received 366 notices at this Depart- ment, and the inspectors at certain nursery centers have received many more. These shipments were in size from a bale to a full carload. A few were found infested with enough scale to show the wisdom of this form of notice, as most of the stock received in the State is reshipped under the certificates of this Depart- ment. It is worthy of notice that the infested stock discovered were in shipments from some of the largest and most reputable firms of nurserymen in the United States. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 119 Arrangements have been made with the United States treas- ury so that the eight custom houses located in this State shall notify the Department of the receipt of nursery stock from for- eign countries having a destination within the borders of New York. An inspector has been assigned to look after the work at New York and Rochester, the two principal ports of entry for this class of goods. Reports have been received from inspectors on the shipment of stock as follows: 36 carloads, 376 boxes and 83 bales, embracing the following stock: fruit trees, 290,036; ornamental trees, 74,076; seedlings, 47,848; shrubs, 182, 994; cur- rants, 44,915; gooseberries, 3,690; other berries, 19,275. Two car- loads containing 27,375 trees were found infested with scale— 11 trees in one and 550 in the other; and 26 boxes containing 22,375 trees and plants were each infested to the extent of 237 trees. The auction rooms in New York city received nursery stock from many sections, and they are under the care of an inspector of this Department. Reports of inspections cover 37,640 trees and plants, a few which were found infested were burned. BEES. The report of work done by agents under the provisions of the law relative to the prevention of diseases among bees (chap- ter 223, Laws of 1899), for the season of 1901, is as follows: Four agents were assigned to this work and their names, addresses and divisions were the same as in 1900, as follows, viz.: First Division—Comprising the counties of Albany, Clinton, Columbia, Dutchess, Essex, Greene, New York, Putnam, Rens- selaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Warren, Washington, West- chester.—Wheeler D. Wright, Agent, Altamont, N. Y. Second Division—Broome, Chenango, Delaware, Kings, Nassau, Orange, Otsego, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Scho- harie, Suffolk, Sullivan, Ulster—N. D. West, Agent, Middle- burg, N. Y. 120 Nevta AnNuAL Report OF THD Third Division—Allegany, Chemung, Cortland, Fulton, Hamil- ton, Herkimer, Madison, Montgomery, Oneida, Schuyler, Steu- ben, Tioga, Tompkins.—Charles Stewart, Agent, Sammonsville, Nay. Fourth Division—Cattaraugus, Cayuga, Chautauqua, Erie, Franklin, Genesee, Jefferson, Lewis, Livingston, Monroe, Niagara, Onondaga, Ontario, Orleans, Oswego, Seneca, St. Law- rence, Wayne, Wyoming, Yates.—Mortimer Stevens, Agent, Pennellville, N. Y. A summary of the work shows that the number of apiaries examined was 905, embracing 25,065 colonies; 487 apiaries, or 54 per cent, were diseased. This number of apiaries embraced 3,451 colonies, 614 of which were destroyed; the remainder were subjected to remedial treatment, and wherever properly and carefully done resulted in saving the colonies and placing them on a paying basis. Early in the season 248 colonies were found dead as a result of starving or smothering over the winter of 1900-1901. We concluded that the work of the agents in the apiaries was effec- tive in checking the spread of bee diseases from the fact that we find in 1900 24 per cent of the colonies of bees in the State were diseased and only 14 per cent in 1901. The diseases found as reportd by the agents of the Depart- ment are “foul brood” (Bacillus alvei), “black brood” (Bacillus milli) and “ pickle brood.” Of these bacterial diseases the black brood is the most malig- nant and contagious, and whenever found should have prompt and thorough attention; weak colonies should be condensed and strengthened; infected colonies destroyed, together with all appurtenances, as no diseased material should be accessible to healthy bees. I am pleased to report that no outbreak of disease has been discovered in any section of the State outside of the infested sections reported last year. In order to meet the exigencies that arise in this work I sug- gest that wherever the words “foul brood” appear in the law COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 121 (chapter 223, Laws of 1899) they shall be followed by the words, “or any other contagious disease,” and I recommend that such an amendment be made. AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES. The appropriations made by the Legislature for the promotion of agriculture, to be distributed to agricultural societies, were $162,000, of which $66,000 was appropriated by chapter 418 of the Laws of 1900, and $96,000 was appropriated by chapter 302 of the Laws of 1901. The amounts apportioned and paid to the agricultural socie- ties entitled to the above-named moneys are as follows: HIOTHEUS VIG LATIMES) «ClUD 0.45 « snc seicelte waists stein oaidelelel sala kislels ojo.» Aistbie) se slefelacsiels slsre $2,000 00 Cambridge Valley Agricultural Society and Stock Breeders’ Association..... 2,000 00 Albany County Agricultural Society and Exposition...................22--.00 2,087 35 Plppany COUNTY, ALTICUILUTAl) SOCLELY:< «sas eens seciorasneiloestic Dasha eed ot 1,369 26 ESHOOHIGN COUNLY« AL TICUILUT Al. SOCLOUY 2, tas < ac.cicoic/c cen v's oe alesis cine a tavaclee powlersiete a:tfers 1,824 05 Gaitaraucus: County. ASTicUltural SOCIELY:.... «+22 alain ctteldelnats o's Biles slelsian otaiste cists 1,487 42 Ghawtauqia County. Agricultural .SOCIGtY. «<< ssc cee seco ccn,acalselelalers oc seyoe tllems 1,339 69 Chemuns, County, Agricultural , SOCICEY: 2 orsc - a'sla)eia's ie os arctelastemtole «ble steiiaaw sleelesierets 1,647 63 Ghenanzo County, Acricultural se Society rics. dateleie cksieiel. ss sidle al daraieton tc, oe dieyalejsee See 6 1,368 21 SimtonuCounty~s Agric witiral, SOCIEEia = <,a.6;5 20414611 -o/sey sles since ej epic ea eee bare ate 2,058 17 Columbia County. Asricultural ‘Society... <200. «0.00 sehen dafsisebleeo steele sce 3,083 82 Momland) County. Aericulturall /SoOcietyy sais «es ocala dolsniaecin ca seh ce biden ads. « Soe teere 2,548 07 Woaware: County: Agricultural _SOCICty: 4... 0:2 acs: cSpleenielels fainas bleeaiis ede odioeloere 1,749 09 Pinenesss County. ASricHiltirall SOCIGtY;.\. << «aac sateties bist coats Rete sissies ice ouvclorerere 4,286 35 HME EOCOUNLYLAPTICUICUTAL | SOCICLY << a0 seelentids atestati seis Re sialon es eerestdava bude 2,325 95 BSsexaCountye ACTICUILUTAL 'SOCIOLY, a cacsisacs aces soa ae ccsebiclelestls oieies cecisairer « 1,426 85 Hrankiin County, Agricultural Societys. desis bere A. oro 018 bie Shc S8 lee Sere cere 2,024 92 HADMLOTE: COUNLY, -ASTICULCUMAL | SOCIOLY: a4 «,as,ns.00.0 cess ccaes, steak lelectra cchysieeia tarenlovare 2,369 82 Coneseey County Arriculturall Society... sss acs s,s ine: Soekiea bool veh ceo.te 1,850 00 ixresnenCountysALTICUIEMTAl , SOCIELY. <4 250-52 cose onateteernis- dacieskeiconcoels « dene 1,318 84 Horkimer County vA sricuiltumall, SOCIGtY.:< <<. sel lesions aos 2 s)-lnsetenteuisiocidesremves cro 1,742 28 Jeerson. County ,AsriculturaliSociotyen iy. esheets festissg weit bese deds inns cecanotre 2,694 13 WewissCounty~ Acriculturall ‘Societys, c «501 vos oie do o0'ae sas 4.0 ners «dere blots eioramecte cle 1,581 07 Hemlock Lake Union Aecriculturall Societyr, «.:...2-<.. sbi ieests s favuid sbkradisoch sciene 1,497 85 BrooknelduArricul~ural, SOCICLY, .... ceiatbiakiets oacteo ba aid lelste eojtdhoic¥s tren chore wiht sweet aero 1,510 66 TOUR POLE IOUS AP riGU EMME Lg SOCIO EY nine eieeinleinicincistecie: wicletecisuiinieite Tompkins ‘County: A'ericulturaltSocietyss . ey cteis cr clei cela clore sects eis eleieres ai=ivlein'= -|\ eneeseoecone soe caeeeae 5,248 00 1,560 00 6,808 00 Wighth Tilinoige es... o- eats aol eo coos eto ee crencobate 5,644 00 560 00 6,204 00 Thirteenth L[linois............ 1,201 60 600 00 3,212 00 1,120 00 6,133 60 Sixthoindiana sere scocosces 184,447 02 1,875 00 13,634 00 3,080 00 203,036 02 Seventh Indiana.... Ss ses emewae 4°000'00)||) soneeosccs 4,000 00 hind) loOwas-a.<<=<< Bocas BAAS MERE S ASSES sewons ccee || seeneeceeeeee Wourth lOwaAz? sscaccccsticsact| secs seee os. 1 eek sence, tl eee cen nook lucene = nee SUSAN) Sees erisoeeescaaaa one ee 1,100 00 8,694 00 2,720 00 339.723 68 Second Kentucky. -.........-... ee a 656) 00) | eee en eee 656 00 ifthe Kentucky-.-2.-c2-cscs Sep eae $40,429,305 42 FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1891, (Dariry PRop- UCTS). Butter. Eastern, 395,301 packages of 70 pounds (average) 27,671,070 pounds, valued at 21 cents per MORIN 2 Us chore lore ate sd Cia ee Greet erate let he Tele 4s ete eto $6,364,346 10 Western, 1,408,324 packages of 50 pounds (aver- age), 27,671,070 pounds, valued at 21 cents per AQUOS 57 cree wie, ae attennue veeiei eae peuele Aeictmamiog 14,787,402 00 Total pounds, 98,087,870, valued at......... $21,151,748 10 ———— CHEESE. Eastern, 86,958,200 pounds, valued at 10 cents per pound .. aidan. §0.is.fhepinw. shaved: atte $8,695,820 00 Western, 3,331,950 pounds, valued at 9 cents per pound. ....... .gagensaes & sic boule abso OC 299,875 50) Total pounds, 90,290,150, valued at......... $8,995,695 50 _ MILK AND CREAM. ride, “gallons iT Reece vee ee ee «Se eee ees 63,057,660: Crude, gallons sold to condensers.............. 17,500,000 SO PAIN, IOUS fain ooencaeinns eve oe ade eae = Saas tao on sa 1,441,930 Condensed milk, gallons (unsweetened)......... 699,890 Total (valued at $14,128,677) gallons....... 82,699,480 ———S—S—_——SS== CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 143 Total value of butter handled ................. $21,151,748 10 ocal value or cheese handled. co... i.e cee ee 8,995,696 50 Total value of milk, cream and condensed milk CDS RUSUTIES gee OE eS a ee 14,128,677 00 Wor Oe er RI 8 SOL BIRD IIR. } $44,276,121 60 _————————— FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1892, (Dairy Prop- UCTS). Butter. Eastern, 414,765 packages of 70 pounds (average), 29,032,930 pounds, valued at 24 cents per pound. $6,967,900 60 Western, 1,248,412 packages of 50 pounds (aver- age), 62,420,600 pounds, valued at 24 cents per pound: 22... 581099. 21. SG. PIEY. eau C8! 13,732,582 80 Total pounds, 91,453,520, value ............ $20,700,432 80 Se SS CHEESE. Eastern, 91,033,950 pounds, valued at 11 cents eUBPOUUE Ten ce coe cen cre ncecc neces case se $10,018,734 50 Western, 4,756,510 pounds, valued at 10 cents PEP UPOUNG cs ede wsate tee te ee eee ae es be Om 473,651 00 Total pounds, 93,770,310, valued at......... $10,487,385 50 _————————————————— MILK AND CREAM. ORCA POUR Sooke ee ee lee cece eee oe net 70,403,420 Crude, gallons sold to condensers.............. 18,000,000 Creameranlons - 'o«.3 FOP APE PEAS IRI 1,826,890 Oondensed milk (unsweetened), gallons......... 616,900 Total (valued at $15,116,668.72) gallons..... 90,847,210 Total value of butter handled................. $20,700,432 80 Total value of cheese handled................. 10,487,385 50 Total value of milk, cream and condensed milk WHOA LAR. ese y reer caciccicssadecoaeseye 15,116,668 72 PEDO MN aorta actor lain ile 05.0) «on 0:aseliep ema ees $46,304,487 02 144 NintHo ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 18938, (Darry Prop- UCTS). Butter. Eastern, 430,387 packages of 70 pounds (average), SONVOMCOAPOUNS 6. os oes ones Bal. Ab ewe eee $7,531,615 00 Western, 1,184,708 packages of 50 pounds (aver- age), 59,235,400 pounds, valued at 23 cents per PeanEN iy. Vie BPS ee tees ede eee 13,624,042 00 Total pounds, 89,361,860, valued at......... $21,155,657 00 CHEESE. Eastern, 87,380,645 pounds, valued at 11 cents PCT OMNY Pepe eee ik Mo isd cee Oe weet Ae cee $9,611,870 95 Western, 4,565,205 pounds, valued at 10 cents Per MOU «.\C\. . veel ss 5 o's Rep Eey ee scaler ete 456,520 50 Total pounds, 91,945,850, valued at......... $10,068,391 45 MILK AND CREAM. OPNAS SAM ON Secs scis/sis oip alae ays «Se elebeyee syhe fale apeteys 72,460,500 Crude, gallons sold to condensers............... 18,000,000 CURE AUI, SANTIS 100366 ii post Naan pleted die ayaa Mis bas 2,037,400 Condensed milk (unsweetened), gallons......... 537,850 Total (valued at $16,249,854.50) gallons..... 93,035,750 Votal-vaiueof-butter handled).20 0, eos. ou ces $21,155,657 00 Total value of cheese handled ................. 10,068,391 45 Total value of milk, cream and condensed milk io ee Lea aS reas | eS See ee ee 16,249,854 50 MN Mo. 5 no's oe Ait ute POR nae tata ea See ae $47,473,902 95 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURB. 145 FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1894, (Dairy PRop- UCTS). ButTteErR. Babtern, 341,705 packages of 70 pounds (average), 23,719,350 pounds, valued at 23 cents per PR MMRAE IA oO toe so) a he pe eel aa wi al'a\ oe Sodas si a's. aXe $5,501,450 50 Western, 1,372,565 packages of 50 pounds (aver- age), 88,628,150 pounds, valued at 21 cents per RUMI EIOUEE ED fo hoe a as Aare cea ie 6 eSNG s%e 0s 0 ai'e 56,40 14,411,911 50 Total pounds, 92,548,500, valued at......... $19,913,362 00 CHEESE. Eastern, 80,671,755 pounds, valued at 10 cents PMO. ohms Foe Me PP ee R Eee oe reas $8,067,175 50 Western, 6,384,550 pounds, valued at 9 cents per PTeaeIMA CAMB etch tt et A table g outed de ely 574,609 50 Total pounds, 87,533,905, valued at......... $8,641,785 00 MILK AND CRBAM. Obi! C1 0 1 i a a a ce 74,172,560 Crude, gallons sold to condensers.............. 18,000,000 CreameoeallOns © esas ei es eee ek eke eee ee 2,043,750 Condensed milk (unsweetened), gallons......... 633,870 Total (valued at $16,107,648) gallons....... 94,850,180 Total value of butter handled ................. $19,913,362 00 Total value of cheese handled................. 8,641,785 00 Total value of milk, cream and condensed milk PG UG 4 eel ae Ana Adi eo ae AS 16,107,648 00 S18 eS oleh AN TNO A AS ha ALAC i Od $44,662,795 00 — 10 146 NintoH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1895, (Dairy Prop- ucts). ButTtTER. Eastern, 26,742 packages of 70 pounds (average), 18,601,940 pounds, valued at 20 cents per OMA Sees STS ees te ee aie SSE terete ni aine eee ® $3,720,388 00 Western, 1,522,881 packages of 50 pounds (aver- age), 76,144,050 pounds, valued at 19 cents per / UU) 3 uae elon Ra aoc ea ape OL Stara fate F 14,467,369 50 Total, 94,745,990 pounds, valued at......... $18,187,757 50 |S es Se a CHEESE. Eastern, 61,255,920 pounds, valued at 94 cents PET POUNAT "fis Pease Ts Cle iis 6 RE oh Oy Cote $5,819,183 90 Western, 5,977,500 pounds, valued at 84 cents per DOOM ING. . cei cates e teva tissbiawteusegese ected 508,087 50 MOCAACVONUE. 6.6065 bE URE CON OS eee $6,327,271 40 ———_———_———— Marae ATE 5 5 fe note hog een suniey siecle ga fete wieial ere iele erate 309,643,600 Orude, quarts sold to condensers............... 72,000,000: Cea a A AEE EES | assess ays esanta is, +: aneieNS mes hc! Is rer Ee 8,885,040 Condensed milk (unsweetened), quarts......... 2,974,440 Total (valued at $16,778,823.49) quarts..... 393,503,080: Pa reer ae en Total value of butter handled. .. feb cj06 eee ors $18,187,757 50 Total value of cheese handled................. 6,327,271 40° Total value of milk, cream and condensed milk BRAUN 5 sss, Sys! aidghie GAG oa tee IC Rei iol aa ols cae 16,778,823 49 (SET REI eG Ce SS eNO a: $41,293,852 39 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURB. 147 FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1896, (Darry Prop- UCTS). BUTTER. Eastern, 236,309 packages of 70 pounds (average), 16,541,630 pounds, valued at 18 cents per EON AEA ce ae a Pa $2,977,493 40) Western, 1,645,017 packages of 50 pounds (aver- age), 96,150,850 pounds, valued at 18 cents per PRPOMIE Oc 2 8s sa sche eae Set et hat etek ates 16,345,644 50 Total, 11,692,480 pounds, valued at......... $19,323,137 90 a a CHEESE. Eastern, 59,133,120 pounds, valued at 94 cents RESET RMDIDN ooo cote a's (als solksis Swia inp. 2 evo aom > Shekels $5,617,645 40) Western, 5,588,520 pounds, valued at 84 cents “EE Dit Seat Gee are re oR Hiewer er Sane rican 475,024 20: Total, 64,721,640 pounds, valued at......... $6,092,669 60 MILK AND CREAM. CTE 01S Sa a 316,111,280 Crude, quarts sold to condemsers.............. 75,000,000 ar SN E80 62 cola ans uci sk rupisucicieisyeusi eH tae ¢ 8,859,440 Condensed milk (unsweetened), quarts.......... 3,205,960 Total (valued at $15,781,881.20) quarts..... 403,176,680 Total value of butter handled.................. $19,493,137 90 Total value of cheese handled................. 6,092,669 60: Total value of milk, cream and condensed milk “i SAO Sea EO ... 15,781,881 20 MEMOIR ct ed Foes pitas << 4 oi eee $41,367,688 70 148 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THB FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 831, 1897, (Darry Prop- UCTS). BurteEr. Eastern, 209,808 packages of 70 pounds (average), 14,686,560 pounds, valued at 18 cents per OOGDGUNS SE. oc ccdsar seed eateiees see et Lee bes $2,642,580 80 Western, 1,964,675 packages of 50 pounds (aver- age), 98,233,750 pounds, valued at 17 cents per PRR Po oes ess wai wale Whe ergiy does we eee 16,699,737 50 Total, 112,920,310 pounds, valued at........ $19,342,318 20 CHEESE. Eastern, 66,598,300 pounds, valued at 10 cents PMA NO MMM a 6! va e'“6/)s iavrasas Stop Nes a eine Ome ahaa eaters $6,659,830 00 Western, 5,699,080 pounds, valued at 9 cents per POUNCE 0006s hace eec sade ensivcatesiaciws 512,917 20 Total, 72,297,380 pounds, valued at......... $7,172,747 20 MILK AND CREAM. IIE oe a0 die aoa sie edule sual ale datelenn nr - - 828,795,480 Crude, quarts sold to condensers............... 75,000,000 Crenmnquarts %: .63 o50cssscatiaedecsadsaniaes 9,331,840 Condensed milk (unsweetened), quarts......... 2,406,920 Total (valued at $15,972,841.42) quarts...... 415,534,240 Total value of butter handled................. $19,342,318 30 Total value of cheese handled................. 7,172,747 20 Total value of milk, cream and condensed milk MAMMICOI GC) 0c cage srse Yep arias reese scenes 15,872,906 92 ENED. 2. oo 5b ves pape sateen ome $42,387,972 42 CoMMISSIONPR OF AGRICULTURE. 149 FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1898, (Darry PRop- uCcTS). Butter. Eastern, 220,313 packages of 70 pounds (average), 15,421,910, valued at 19 cents per pound....... $2,930,162 90 Western, 1,748,682 packages of 50 pounds (aver- age), 87,434,100 pounds, valued at 18 cents. per LLG lina nea ec Coc Oa eae aD 15,738,188 00 Total, 102,856,010 pounds, valued at......... $18,668,300 90 CHEESE. Eastern, 66,812,700 pounds, valued at 8 cents per PLLC ae tl Rida pee eco ror aiee eae Ec RC $5,345,016 00 Western, 4,072,320 pounds, valued at 7 cents per eA te? EE IIE POA ee ant SER LS GOR 285,062 40 Total, 70,885,020 pounds, valued at......... $5,630,078 40 ———————— ALDGATE ig Se a a et RR 349,545,000 Crude, quarts sold to condensers............... 80,000,000 ol ETO UE hg ER ear ea 10,630,440 Condensed milk (unsweetened), quarts.......... 3,146,760 Total (valued at $17,458,769.46) quarts...... 443,322,200 otal valuelof butter: handled... 0220.0 o0..08. $18,668,300 90 Total value of cheese handled.................. 5,630,078 40 Total value of milk, cream and condensed milk IMRAN 0 ee Lesa cic chon hrc KH taike fa io Nerecrd roils baad 17,458,769 46 Lat TS Rate ey anne sec $41,757,148 7 150 NintoH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1899, (Darry PrRop- ucTSs). Butter. Eastern, 217,299 packages of 70 pounds (average), 15,210,930 pounds, valued at 18 cents per pound $2,737,967 40 Western, 1,773,075 packages of 50 pounds (aver- age), 88,653,750 pounds, valued at 19 cents per TORTOISE eas isiwrei dee aA hein abe anemia 16,844,212 50 Total, 103,864,680 pounds, valued at........ $19,582,179 90 CHEESE. Eastern, 58,773,330 pounds, valued at 10 cents AMS POO ING oe sore's, do yai'e, ae oie sn)a ape feign eae ee eas $5,877,333 00 Western, 5,310,560 pounds, valued at 9 cents per TS OMMUUR oy cn ocaciat oie oe oleae oeteshas et diate sye ee eee 477,950 40 Total, 64,083,890 pounds, valued at......... $6,355,283 40 ———————— oe MACS AMIDT UR, 02s. o's @ pismo sale wo wen sss hiel sins 363,070,760 Crude, quarts sold to condensers...........5.0- 84,800,000 ARE ECINIMMNIATLS vs 2015 c0'/si0 0.0 atin soles tae phe oie 12,734,800 Condensed milk (unsweetened), quarts......... 3,330,360 Total (valued at $18,370,317) quarts........ 463,935,920 Total value of butter handled.................. $19,582,179 90 Total value of cheese handled...............+.- 6,355,283 40 Total value of milk, cream and condensed milk MMMM 2. . .cisaccrusssvaees at eiccapne® Renee 18,370,317 00 ROMER cd eueeen mee ee one $44,307,780 30 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURB. 151 FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1900, (Dairy Prop- UCTS). Butter. Eastern, 179,990 packages of 60 pounds (average), 10,799,400 pounds, valued at 204 cents per POUNG ets bie cote sls olds Gite S clei SW Deke es $2,213,877 00 ‘Western, 1,771,544 packages of 60 pounds (aver- age), 106,292,640 pounds, valued at 203 cents PCL OUNG oui ek tee ke heehee ee ee tee eee a 21,789,991 20 Total, 117,092,040 pounds, valued at........ $24,003,868 20 oe CHEESE. Eastern, 66,051,755 pounds, valued at 11 cents per POOH, «. 5.7 IIT. TR. DOM, PUI IN $7,265,693 05 Western, 7,727,840 pounds, valued at 10 cents per RE oats ales sis ioe Pies! tine apo ete a cise age nis) 4s Sas cisycie 772,784 00 Total, 73,779,595 pounds, valued at......... $8,038,477 05 SS SSS SSS ESS MEPUOCH QUATTS 2.6.0 c cece cece ete eee ne el one mls 371,447,800 Crude, sold to condensers, quarts.............. 87,344,000 Cream and condensed milk (unsweetened), quarts 16,998,520 Total (valued at $20,594,530) quarts........ 475,790,320 ———— eee ‘otal value of butter handled ........:.....:... $24,003,868 20 Total value of cheese handled................4- 8,038,477 05 Total value of milk, cream and condensed milk BPR CCR UC ayaa ete te cite grctclaea s(tpe #6) oe c sisi chalaeae 20,594,530 00 Dope o1 8. ..6s26s Baits ce kits ose. la obits Scheel $52,636,875 25 ——S——S—SS—S—S——————SS—S= 152 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1901, (Darry Prop- ucTS). Burtrer. Eastern, 187,471 packages of 60 pounds (average), 11,248,260 pounds, valued at 194 cents per [RIL OE. SE esos ise cede seen a aaa e's $2,193,410 70 Western, 1,867,382 packages of 50 pounds (aver- age), 93,869,100 pounds, valued at 193 cents per FRM LE. ss og 80d Che eS eRe ea eee ee 18,206,974 50 Total, 104,617,360 pounds, valued at........ $20,400,385 20 CHEESE. Eastern, 65,848,965 pounds, valued at 103 cents per pound ; .so7.2haes bf tae borlar-ebasoge 36t- $6,913,616 32 Western, 6,954,200 pounds, valued at 10 cents per pound vied .etiren O! te haolaw aherred GR 695,420 00 Total, 72,798,165 pounds, valued at......... $7,609,036 32 MILK. Cans of crude milk of 40 quarts each........... 9,621,572 Cans of cream and unsweetened condensed milk PrMeASGUANTS CQG NPI ies asi shetieless 449,332 There is also produced within the State of New York and sold during the year to condensers, most of which reaches the New York market, estimated to be not less than 2,249,108 cans of 40 quarts each. Value of erude, milk yhandled ... .j6.0 5p. (5 sire a cies xg $18,662,682 24 Value of cream and unsweetened condensed milk SCOT Ss EN aR APB A kp OS lala Mara Rape 9 3,030,744 34 Value of crude milk sold to condensers......... 3,193,733 36 PeOVANS Lites ese eae ee eee eee ee eS $19,887,109 94 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 153 Maca yarueies butter handled..............0<6- $20,400,385 20 Mitanyainerat cheese handled.........--.......- 7,609,036 32 Total value of dairy products handled during the SOCOM, ene ee ote rer ass cs ceres sess 47,896,531 46 Total value of dairy products handled during the eMMPL NOE ee aes so carstede sels e aioe e he ke Ss: 52,636,875 25 Total decrease in value of dairy products handled emiparenewith L900 0 snes. aces ese mec es ree: 4,740,343 79 The following statistics, giving the value of Eastern dairy products handled in New York city for the past twelve years, show an increase in value annually from 1890 to 1895, and a decrease in 1894, 1895, 1896 and 1897, and an increase in 1898, 1899, 1900, and decrease in 1901: TOTAL YEARLY. VALUE OF PRODUCTS HANDLED, 1890-1901. EASTERN. LSE) 3) oor dnc Ae ea a Ba eect tn arco eb abetted 527 851,657 22 PU On hice atk a yer ers ee sb oe ecu Sa Se a toate 29,189,943 10 ee ones re od ee ee ce oe een a a)e Boer ene wrk Os 32,148,404 92 Wie Roe, sire one ade oe ceccerera ¢ x sy spe siete os See eae 33,392,740 45 ee cin Ra a ec oe saree mies he = sists wes ee woe 29,676,274 00 coke] nc neler id pete ioe cerurate nearieanta eaten 26,318,395 39 esa ek rea eR eiahiarreey. a8 ogc crit ons a) Sieh a 8 24,377,020 00 SEE ge cee DLS Cee cae nee oa Acetic een aa tare 25,175,252 22 OM saree eee oy erst ec ete ade fal okie! 6) yar = Hy'8eH ws 8 25,733,938 36 ey aval ee corel hk aicipe eee Ga ele aes as estas 26,985,617 40 Pe bone avase see de tia ltjs even kde OS Kd ew ee 30,074,100 05 UDO Beem tele ees cdc, ac a cie-ce e's @ evel a eis» 2 wiehars 28,994,136 96 WESTERN. ees. 3) aor ai, bee JOEL odie Y- 68 eRe $13,075,657 20 ME hh ia Meee oh SAE «laos areas 15,087,277 50 RE coho MS ee TORRE gis tee dm) d tk wakto ee 14,206,083 00 La bo i eee opi Dodis th eddagt 14,080,562 50 154 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THB POG AROE NOES, oo: vies vere sarn, DOLD OM, SAREE $14,986,521 00 PRO LT seeds nt aee mocap allen 989M 16,975,456 50 1996 ........,.20) gelih hothaud atonboug ante 16,990,668 70 Vel Et CU DE eGR tal dle veins irr Cpa 16,699,732 50 18985004, ie aaiinh bili aia honagigeiy, 16,023,200 40 WRITE NMR oceova.' varios. oP 2 1 ee 17,322,162 90 1900"... boon bier yl Yo aples 22,562,775 20 LGU MOEA! 0s): ou laees OF A) a Red 18,902,394 20 Exports of Butter and Cheese. The following statistics, taken from the records of the New York Mercantile Exchange, show the exports of butter and cheese each year since November 1, 1883: ButtTErR. Pounds. From the port of New York, 1888.............. 18,811,400 From the port of New York, 1884.............. 15,865,600 From the port of New. York, 1885. .4 7. 05.506 v0 14,601,550 From the port of New York, 1886.............. 11,677,750 From the port of New York, 1887............0. 9,933,400 From the port of New York, 1888.............. 7,000,650 From the port of New York, 1889.............. 19,941,176 From.the port of New York, 1890... 02.....0... 20,623,534 From, the port of New York, 1891........2¢s26: 11,115,505 From the port of New York, 1892.....5........ 9,083,478 From the port of New York, 1893.............. 5,336,449 From.the-port of New York, 1894.............. 8,288,670 From the port of New York, 1895.............. 11,133,747 From, the port of New York, 1896.............. 18,540,091 Krom. the port of New York,:1897.......<0..... 25,757,263 From.the port of New York, 1898............., 8,646,282 From the port of New York, 1899..:........... 19,106,563 From the port of New York, 1900.............. 9,285,991 From the port of New York, 1901.............. 15,833,632 From all ports in the United States, 1883....... 22,375,708 From all ports in the United States, 1884....... 21,391,196 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURB. 155 Pounds. From all ports in the United States, 1885....... 19,593,872 From all ports in the United States, 1886....... 14,404,727 From all ports in the United States, 1887....... 12,531,171 From all ports in the United States, 1888....... 8,749,366 From all ports in the United States, 1889....... 25,983,054 From all ports in the United States, 1890....... 23,895,914 From all ports in the United States, 1891....... 14,970,538 From all ports in the United States, 1892....... 11,851,250 From all ports in the United States, 1893....... 6,837,289 From all ports in the United States, 1894....... 10,231,417 From all ports in the United States, 1895....... 13,935,017 From all ports in the United States, 1896....... 23,335,729 From all ports in the United States, 1897....... 35,631,967 From all ports in the United States, 1898....... 13,160,296. From all ports in the United States, 1899....... 28,064,780 From all ports in the United States, 1900....... 12,029,435. From all ports in the United States, 1901....... 22,283,069 CHEESE. Pounds. rom the port of New York,"1883. 0. 0... ee 97,897,850 From the port of New York, 1884.............. 96,634,256 From the port of New York, 1885.............. 82,934,750 From the port of New York, 1886.............. 78,763,400: Pram ches port of New York, 188/.............5. 72,529,500 Prom tne port of New York, 1888.5. .......2..: 75,840,700 Peametne port of New York, 1889... ..........5. 75,046,326 from thé port of New York, 1890... ..0....0. 70,208,270 Prom the port of New York, 1891...0..........0. 61,299,205. From the port of New York, 1892.............. 67,482,651 Prom the port of New,York, 1893.(.......... 53,293,060 From the port of New York, 1894.............. 52,908,719 From the port of New York, 1895.........2.... 30,692,702 rom the port of New York, 1896..:........... 25,947,401 Prom the port of New York, 1897.........04.+ 42,514,776 From the port of New York, 1898.............: 24,180,428 156 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Pounds. From the port of New York, 1899......0...00..5 18,613,484 | From the port of New York, 1900.............. 30,837,470 From ‘the ‘port of. New York, 19012. 0.3.05 )J.e05.5 20,879,753 From all ports in the United States, 1883....... 111,973,140 From all ports in the United States, 1884....... 111,950,686 From all ports in the United States, 1885....... 95,047,243 From all ports in the United States, 1886....... 86,636,685 From all ports in the United States, 1887....... 87,069,804 From all ports in the United States, 1888....... $1,595,304 From all ports in the United States, 1889....... 98,140,486 From all ports in the United States, 1890....... 91,014,571 From all ports in the United States, 1891....... 77,148,794 From all ports in the United States, 1892....... 81,589,361 From all ports in the United States, 1893....... 67,925,712 From all ports in the United States, 1894....... 68,607,186 From all ports in the United States, 1895....... 40,610,242 From all ports in the United States, 1896....... 37,515,798 From all ports in the United States, 1897....... 61,176,207 From all ports in the United States, 1898....... 39,396,810 From all ports in the United States, 1899....... 35,396,810 From all ports in the United States, 1900....... 50,825,783 From all ports in the United States, 1901....... 32,139,505 The total receipts of cheese in the city of New York during the year ending October 31, 1898, were 88,488,380 pounds, of which 42,514,776 pounds were exported, leaving for home trade 45,953,604 pounds, being 8,865,699 pounds more than the previous year for home consumption. The total receipts of cheese in the city of New York during the year ending October 31, 1898, were 70,886,020 pounds, of which 24,180,428 pounds were exported, leaving for home trade 46,704,592 pounds, being 750,988 pounds more than the previous year for home consumption. The total receipts of cheese in the city of New York during ~ the year ending October 31, 1899, were 64,085,890 pounds, of which 18,613,484 pounds were exported, leaving for home trade CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 157 45,470,406 pounds, being 1,234,186 pounds less for our home trade than the previous year. The total receipts of cheese in the city of New York during the year ending October 31, 1900, were 73,779,595 pounds, of which 30,837,470 pounds were exported, leaving for home trade 42,942,125 pounds, being 2,528,281 pounds less for home trade than the previous year. The total receipts of cheese in the city of New York during the year ending October 31, 1891, were 72,798,165 pounds, of which 20,879,753 pounds were exported, leaving for home trade 51,918,412 pounds, being 8,976,287 pounds more for home trade than the previous year. SERVICES—VINEGAR. Number Number Estimated INSPECTOR. of of miles days. | inspections.| traveled. Bginy JE Ge GSG. cegoca doce ce Cee coccscer coocce BS eeeeee 8 835 320 obmneMiGG nit hae masea ce se eintiaone we aioinw oes are saeco 15 1,125 610 AOU) Clark )csecesasanccacccssstedeccates Sc steecadens 15 1,300 795 Ue Wis HiBETES 7 oceanat acccrnts ch osoe cso cape RaDane cme nercode 25 1,465 1,000 WliarlesiSearsecewcace st coer cawecset co as sas qase caso cane san 22 1,930. 1,050 \\V TUS Is EG eee oc eacsecessecre Hea Ss -EpesneEEHSeEc 15 1,020 800 SERVICES—M‘¢LK. Number Gann Estimated INSPECTOR. of crenata mniles days. P : traveled. ARIOS I SCRE Skee acl ree co celwioniecieteivisiuioweed asiviceuin elses eacio= 70 21,240 3,650 SEP MIEPUBIN AY wena sca cwcccas cocnsacscccucceccaaesctcccesscer 50 21,120 4 550 AS Un, 1. (QE Loe. be coccesaectaco loc yeDOcbaSobeeoones 61 20,630 4,110 EDI 8 Gen AG) ee osoc ge sense cenocceesoooeececceeShooose 65 19,190 4,500 WOMMM CG UITG) scons ee so ccematecasiccece seve sasinslosanamee 65 20,830 4,020 VU ENT el BST ec cee CHE EES SE COC B OS DOHICOODODO USCIS 55 21,990 4,700 SERVICES—OLEOMARGARINE. Number Samples Estimated INSPECTOR. ° purchased miles days. and taken. traveled. Gina Tab Oe he capo ce One CAP noOnoooeARTarbe 90s 50e 232 538 8,510 OUNYM CG MILO s es cea = se eenan sees deem ne asicwa== cjecle samme 220 512 8,406 Jia Wis ORT R Atoka Rees taemteeEascspcecicoooD acd oospadntige 230 530 7,680 ASCHee Ds ClAarkeee cece ec cecn ease o ee cee es sneeasinccdcsne 209 505 7,070 CNA INGE S588 6 cabo CORO SOC rec DOSE DOC SUD OEE OOO ROOD | 211 490 7,820 Wiliams GrONtGSe esses cosas tosemenssectcesenncccancoe: 235 536 7,200 158 Ninto ANNUAL R®PORT OF THE ANALYSES—VINEGAR. Samples Appearances Days in ANALYZER. analyzed. in cases. court. Ma ward!(G. LOVE, CniO sn ccstaccsecnscssc somes es T | wasctewceasans |e aes eee va Joseph F. Geisler, Ph.C.-.... eeepc dbase sncemans igl 1 1 ANALYSES—MILK. Samples Appearances Days in ANALYZER. analyzed. in cases. court, PO WATE G,MsOVO) ER: Osco ccnanici ccc sc nisisieteicis 44 18 18 Joseph l. Geisler, PRC. ooo nn nae o nam 22 13 8 ANALYSES—OLEOMARGARINE. Samples Appearances Days in ANALYZER. analyzed. in cases, court. Edward'G. Love, Ph: ©-<<.0-c0ssec0sccsnwsosess 69 42 35 Joseph F. Geisler, Ph.C....----.--.---- SaDsOE nS z 47 34 ANALYSES—CONDENSED MILK. Samples ANALYZER. analyzed. UGE DN 105 (EGG BH Canna aasad socsacs ad seectadocboasacnccee Sebbdincessanciasc: 3 ANALYSES—MAPLE SYRUP. ANALYZER Samples : analyzed. Joseph I. Geisler, PhiC 2-2. co ce went ae ween vee uncenewnulseeuveenuussnses sh ac ee 1 VINEGAR—SUMMARY OF WORK. Number of days in court, experts and chemists....... Go FA istat vc S4 tec nitoapicrien es 9 Number OF GAYS ODtAININE (OVIGSI CO tae aoe alciec wis vs\e o s)0 010 lnln ola! s n'aln/einlniuip/s/uin\slefain ius levels 6 INDMmber OF GAYS ON! BPCCIAL GWE ceria oc none» ws slob /ocleia aclu nls aluleie a's nis biclale cluinieints wipes 1 Number of days inspecting, retail storess sci sccsecsdesdededeseseccorccseteebesees 65 Number of days inspecting wholesale stores and manufactories.......-..++++0. 19 Total mumber Of, CAVSiiis sc csc ccclnmacne science sesscs)s Siaints estate ae tere PO NY Ee 100 / COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 159 Number of wholesale stores and manufactories inspected..........cceeeeeeeees 108 Number of barrels and casks of vinegar inspected.................. 2,950 Number of retail stores, vinegar inspected.............-.cecceccececes 2,980 Number of barrels and casks of vinegar inspected.................65 4,725 Total number of vinegar inspections.............ccceeecceeuceees 7,670 Number of samples purchased and taken...............cccecccccccecs 109 Number of samples delivered to chemists.............cceccccscuceeees 16 NITED OL COMPLAINTS MAGE: | .\v'ctaciscisseisleie'vieleisisicicjaleasee see e's eievecieis ve aeaaise 15 eyuimper Of APPCArancesS) IN" CASES! caiececadase cscs cccisccdesseececssce cess 35 Hstimated number’ of ‘Milestraveledcc2ccs-.ssccecaccecsscctsescceesss 4,575 Number of analyses of samples of vinegar...............0cceeececceecs aly MIM BEr sOLVCLVIL PCNAltY “ACHIONS2 cc cosescsieecceveclrses«csoceeseccccwece 2 PUL DOr LOL CLYil (PENAaltIGS IMPOSEU ec accicciunicece veces cc cccmecceccecce 1 MNaImMperrOr Gases awaiting, trial’. ..:s:5.c0 se.) ebieicisis «eae esjeo we cies ea acle gees L Puli Ders Of (CASES GISPOSER ‘OLscccc caseisiclo ccs sicicioens Dacocece decees sehaes a SS SERVICES—LINSEED OIL Arch. D. Clark: ROCA EH UMPC. Of 4 GAYS «0;<:« c:<1a1s/0:5(sis sysieieie/s eisielsieyeroia eves ala slofe’e Galas las eterelaate ate 18 NID CIs Ole COMP la INES) INS GE cicrersicre v'«(c/elcielsislercteree esiasrsisisielee teksto eee 13 INWmber sof APPCATANIGES iNy CASES. . estab Rte Cele 230 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 16L- INC BEL Of COM VICLI OIG m Me ptelelats care o) cis 51-61! staveissciessie eter sisie s/ er0ieio1e:e(01-1e e/oleralalelainia\a)asels'sve/a cisiejele 28.- RSET OS) LEM SE exc terauereaciete oi stetes, vin-cle o's) cYolnisiclovesal sayeioee 9 MELEE ate CCCEASCOU ain scscro.cia o> cin) = etspy erate etmass einie uma Seas iclmnape sae aingeies cm ate es bia ore inte Spee 1 ANGCORLI RET GREER ARES One coseeeagbonico coroc. CO Gar GER n OS TOSUC ASDC aROat ey Sean nee 1 PROSECUTIONS—LINSEED OIL. Warrant Number issued or sum- Final of case. Court. mons served. disposition. 11 Second District Municipal Court, Long Island City.... July 6, 1901 Pending. 12 Second District Municipal Court, Newtown, L. lI...... July 6, 1901 Pending. 21 Second District Municipal Court, Newtown, L. I...... July 6, 1901 Pending. 24 First District Municipal Court, Long Island City..... July 19, 1901 Pending. 14 Second District Municipal Court, Newtown, L. I...... July 6, 1901 $100 and costs, 16 Second District Municipal Court, Newtown, L. I...... July 6, 1901 Pending. 27 First District Municipal Court, Long Island City.... July 15, 1901 Pending. PROSECUTIONS—VINEGAR. Warrant Number issued or sum- Final of case. Court. mons served. disposition. 2468 Third District Municipal Court, New York City..... . Sept. 1, 1901 Pending. 931 Supreme Court, New York County.....ccceessicseeeees Aug. 1, 1901 $100 and costs. Status and final disposition of vinegar cases previously reported. Case No. Court. Place. Remarks. 2574 | Supreme....) Kings county..--....... Discontinued. 2623 | Supreme....| New York county ...... Action discontinued November 10, 1900, on payment of $100 penalty and costs and per- manent injunction entered restraining the repetition of the offence. 2608 | Supreme....| Kings county.......-.... Action discontinued October 24, 1900, on pay- ment of civil penalty of $100 and costs. 2614 | Supreme....| Kings county........... Case still pending. PROSECUTIONS—MILK. Warrant Number issued or sum- Final of case. Court. mons served. disposition. 8685 Supreme Court, New York County..............0-0008 - Aug. 1, 1901 Pending. CE) So Gog GG SRISTING GEAOCCB IE CMOO CARES cited data Scie aah chon cics chet a Sept. 20, 1901 Penalty, $50. 8676 First District Municipal Court, New York City....... Oct. 21, 1900 $100 and costs. Sb7T4 Supreme) Court. KAN SS COWL Vice clare eleive eislelsiafe steer <1s=\msyeieiao ee" QUIS ICTS FEES OSS ICGEO SSE ENG trerseesss-gTOIsseg Jeloedg soos TRdLOLMD JOLISIGE WIL se-"*1ed LION IT JOLUSIG. OF ecwce cece siaese AIT PLCt) sovels seieleisiereieise isso ATI PUB LE) sree ed rojuny JOWISIC IST seers -TBdPOLUN, JOL4SIG. 436 OOOO SMCS DOat fir eh Gi tils| "41009 *pajsodau Ajsnoraasd sasvo y)vum fo uorrsodsip pouy pun snjzvjzg 164 Number of case. 4624 Supreme Court, New York County NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PROSECUTIONS—OLEOMARGARINE. Court. 2872 Third District Municipal Court, Brooklyn............. “ Sew eee meee ee ee eee 3269 Second District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City 2829 Second District City Magistrate’s Court, Brooklyn.... 4318 Second District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City 4337 County Court, Nassau County 4500 Supreme 4578 Supreme 4606 Supreme 4622 Supreme 4604 Supreme 4559 Supreme i ee ee a Court, ‘New York Coufity. .3.....c.c.. fcc Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Kings County Kings County New “York= County .&....5. i» «+ ge -- 2 cee Kings County Kings County er i ee i a aay 4739 Third District, Municipal Court, Brooklyn....+....... 2466 First District Municipal Court, New York City....... 4320 Supreme Court, “New -York-County.....0.32...5.....- 4540 Third District Municipal Court, New York City....... 4594 Supreme Court, New York County..s.....0.5...55..... 4571 First District City Magistrate’s Court, Long Island City 4614 Supreme Court, New “York: County.............%...... 4619 Supreme Court, New York County..........5...0....... 4592 Second District Municipal Court, New York City..... 4563 First District City Magistrate’s Court, Long Island City 4309 First District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City 4357 Seventh District Municipal Court, New York City..... 2738 | 4355 | Seventh District City Magistrate’s Court, N. Y. City 4302 Supreme Court, New York County..................... 4317 4336 | Second District City Magistrate’s Court, N. Y. City. 4351 Third District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City 4565 Second District Municipal Court, Brooklyn............ 4646 Supreme Court, Kings County 4636 First District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City a aed 4577 Supreme Court, New York County....c.c..ccceseseeeeee 4476 Fourth District City Magistrate’s Court, N. Y. City.. 4640 District Municipal Court, New York City.............. 4599 Distirct Municipal Court, New York City.............. 4570 Supreme Court, Kings County 3326 Eighth District Municipal Court, New York City...... 4626 Supreme Court, Kings County 4557 Seventh District City Magistrate’s Court, N. Y. City.. 4596 Supreme Court, New York County..........seecseeeees 4615 Fourth District City Magistrate’s Court, N. Y. City.. 4477 District Municipal Court, Brooklyn.......... Bris Muse plover 4573 Supreme Court, Kings County........... Ge 3 eget aoc 4612 Fourth District City Magistrate’s Court, Brooklyn.... 4455 Seventh District Municipal Court, New York City.... 4620 Seventh District Municipal Court, New York City.... 4483 Warrant Noy. Jan. Mar. Noy. 30, Mar. 29, June 22, Jan. 30, Feb. 8, Feb. 6, Jan. 25; Mar. 4, Feb. 20, June 19, July 26, July 31, June 19, Mar. 26, Feb. 12, July 22, Mar. 2, May 27, Jan. 11, Mar. 18, July 24, 24, 22, 17, May 16, June 20, 15, 24, 18, May July May May Mar. i issued or sum-> mons served. 1900 1901 1901 1900 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 1901 Final disposition. $50 and costs. $25 and costs. Fined $50. Fined $25. Suspended. Pending. Pending. $25 and costs.. $100 and costs. Pending. Pending. $25 and Pending. Pending. Pending. Pending. Pending. Fined $25. Pending. $100 and costs- Pending. Fined $150. Suspended. Pending. costs. Pending. Pending. Pending. Fined $100. Decision served. $25 and costs. Fined $150 and 3 months in city prison. $100 and costs. Absconded. $30 and costs. Paid costs. $25 and costs. Discontinued. $25 and costs. Fined $25. $100 and costs, Fined $50. $50 and costs. $100 and costs. Fined $200. $25 and costs. $50 and costs. $25 and costs, $25 and costs. re- COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. Warrant Number issued or sum- of case. Court. mons served. 4609 Supreme Court, New York County...........2...esc000. Jan. 28, 1901 a4obe supreme), @ourt, Kings) Coun tying cca cides sate s/ecstieis ee Mar. 1, 1901 4475 District Municipal Court, Brooklyn................s... Feb. 11, 1901 4341 First District City Magistrate’s Court, N. Y. City.... May 3, 1901 bees | Second District City Magistrate’s Court, N. Y. City.. April1i, 1901 2927 Supreme Court, New York County............sesesevees Mar. 22, 1901 4584 Tenth District Municipal Court, New York City....... Feb. 14, 1901 2814 Seventh District Municipal Court, New York City.... Oct. 11, 1900 4339 First District City Magistrate’s Court, New Brighton, SP LL Hoge - bbeddee -O50-TeRe dee 800 a bodooconwne “AGES ona Sept. 17, 1901 24RR Sao cee opodb. JODGOOO) JOOR SPOOR CUBED Grit te SOOSCL SEEC aL OR AD tt Mar., 1901 4544 Second District Municipal Court, Flushing, L. lI...... April 3, 1901 4492 Supreme Court, New York County.......0....eseceeeoes Feb. 11, 1901 4488 Supreme Court, New York County...............00058.. Jan. 30, 1901 4468 Seventh District City Magistrate’s Court, N. Y. City.. Oct. 29, 1900 4512 First District City Magistrate’s Court, L. I. City...... Oct. 15, 1900 4538 Supreme Court, New York County.......c...00.-e.eece. Feb. 18, 1901 4551 First District City Magistrate’s Court, L. I. City...... Dec. 29, 1900 4497 Supreme Court;, Kings. Countys ..RE2..R.. te Reds mes Mar. 4, 1901 4541 Supreme Gaqurt= KimesaCoumn tye. vs Sexcce ec dais « craiets qaictdoonece Feb. 20, 1901 4554 Supreme Court, Kings County. 2... .......2..cececaeeses Feb. 20, 1901 4494 District Municipal Court, New York City.............. Jan. 30, 1901 4562 Supreme Court, QUEENS “COUNTY. oe oe oe sie oe cin ore tre ore oye on os Feb. 20,1901 4552 District Municipal Court, Brooklyn.................+0+- Feb. 17, 1901 4313 Sixth District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City Mar. 28, 1901 2726 Third District City Magistrate’s Court, Brooklyn...... Jan. 28, 1901 4313 First District Municipal Court, Brooklyn..........+.... July 8, 1901 4307 Second District City Magistrate’s Court, N. ¥. City.. Mar. 21, 1901 3310 Fourth District City Magistrate’s Court, N. Y. City.. Feb. 20, 1901 4491 District City Magistrate’s Court, Staten Island, N. Y. Mar. 4, 1901 4596 District Municipal Court, New York City.............. July 12, 1901 4303 District Municipal Court, New York City.............. July 17, 1901 4647 First District City Magistrate’s Court, Brooklyn...... Jan., 23, 1901 4582 Sixth District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City Jan. 16, 1901 4470 Fifth District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City Jan. 15, 1901 2811 First District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City Jan. 16, 1901 2725 Supreme Court, New York County..........ssceeeseeeee July 23, 1901 4625 Fifth District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City Jan. 29, 1901 4628 District Municipal Court, New York City.............. Feb. 28, 1901 4631 District Municipal Court, New York City.............. Mar. 8, 1901 4359 Sixth District City Magistrate’s Court, Brooklyn...... July 3, 1901 4558 District Municipal Court, New York City.............. Mar. §8,:'1901 4630 First District City Magistrate’s Court, New York City Jan. 16, 1901 "165 Final disposition. $50 and costs. Discontinued. Fined $75. Suspended. Absconded. $25 and costs. $25 and costs. $25 and costs. Absconded. $25 and costs, Fine $100. $50 and costs. $25 and costs. Fined $25. Fined $25. $25 and costs. Fined $150. Fined $100. Fined $100. Fined $100. Fined $100. Discontinued. $75 and costs. Fined $300. Fined $200. $50 and costs. Absconded. Absconded. Fined $25. $25 and costs. $25 and costs. Fined $200. Fined $200. Fined $200. Fined $200. $50 and costs. Fined $200. $45 and costs. $50 and costs. Bail forfeited. $50 and costs. Fined $200. NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THB 166 “Surpuod [M8 oseH “83800 pue og¢ Jo Aj;Bsu0d [tA10 yo gyuowAed wo ‘1061 ‘g OUNDL ponuyuOdsIp TOYO WY “‘Satpued 1(198 osevp *]811} SUEY *durpuoed [/138 ose *je19004)-f00.109}Y 94} JO UOLJOOIIp Aq ponuiydoosIp DONOW ‘O01$ poug ‘ AqInd peolg *sjsoo puw Ayeu0ed cz$ 10z Bry UI] sos yorpsea ‘Aanf Aq [RLU *‘Sutpuod [[198 esep *[BL1} SOIC 897809 pu pcg Jo uourded wo ‘pO6l ‘FZ 1940990 ponulzaooSIp HOLOY [Oly Jane Vy *g]800 puv Aqjcued ozg 10; Brureld soy yaomspnl [ey ‘suipued uon0V *8]800 pu peg Jo sa[saad jo yuomAed uo ‘ong ‘pz J9QmloD0q, penUl}UODsIpP TOYO “Gz¢ JO JaamAvd j1at0 Jo yaomAvd uo ‘ONET ‘FZ 9QmeDe(T PeNUL}nOORIpP DOO W *ponulyaoosip aoyoVy *9}900 puv ¢cz¢ Jo Aqjeaod [tao Jo yuomAvd uo ‘ONsT ‘OF IOQMOAON ponuydoOoSIp DOD VY “93800 puv cz¢ jo {j,eu0d ]rato yo yuomAed uo ‘OST ‘0G TeqmoeAONY ponuUyUOOSIP UOHOY "83800 pave czg JO Az ved [TAL0 Jo yuomAed UO ponUulyuoOdsIp UOYOW Satpued uonoy 83800 pue oc¢ Jo {j,eUed [LATO yo yuem (ed Uo 44Zl JOqMIOAON ponuyuodsIp DONDY *[e19004)-A0010}) VY OY} JO UOTZO0IIp Aq ponuijuoOsIp UOMO *[Bl1} sanIea Vy ‘ely Sunway “g2$ Joy BypULe[d soy yorprea + Aanf Aq [ery "Tey Duy iea Vy *[e11} dan wAY ‘ela} Sagem y *8]800 puv (cg Jo Ay] eUed [r1A10 yo yaomABd uo ponajuodsip uolQO WV “‘pyIBUOY Peer rere errr errr Poe eer rrr Tere errr sy eee ee wwe www wwe eens 106T ‘sz Arenuee 006L ‘IT 10q0}00 O96T OT aeamooeG errr rr ry OO6T ‘0g 19q MI9AO NT 006T ‘0g 1oqmeAON 0061 ‘82 1eqmesoN Opa er asquesoN 0061 ‘9 s0qmoo0q 006T ‘ZI 10q MIeAO N *[8LI} OJ porleD “sears Kguno0o Bday srereses= qm0n00 sd0;y *--* Aqun09 Y1OX MON *s** Aqgunoo Y1IOX MON srore= AGT) HIOX MON --** AqUN0D YOK MON ssoo""- AGI) HIOX MON ESeseeSe = er WAT TOOLS storeee-- JuN00 ssulLy veresees- qon0o sony mcigieoisie'n Aqyunoo ssuly sereses-- AQONOd SAUL toeeeees- A ONOD SBOLY sor-eeee {qamn0d SdILy se** Aqun0d yIOX MON *-*- AQuN0O YO MONT *-** AqUn00 YIOA AON seers AGT) YIOX MON sores AVI) YIOK MON sreres AVI) YIOK MON **** AJUNOD YIOX MON veecese > Aq ano0o ssary soeeeee-Kian00 RDO pao ----Ayan0o sdury *--- AyUN0D YOK MON sees AJUNOD YIOX MON *--- AVano0d YO X MIN “--+ Ajun0d yIOX MON soeseees- Mun00 ssaLy seeseeessKQUNOD SIOLY e08[d weeeeecers SUOIBBOS [PIXOS wee nme ewer e wwe emeidng emoidng emoeidug sees *"""" STOIBSAG [BIOUGH emeidng teesess==* gorssag [eloadg soreerees edroranyy JOIysiqd teccececcccecseres= QmQIdng eee reer reer eres Serer rere eee eres emoidngs emoidng emoidug emoidng emoidng emoidng emeidng emeadng --> yediorun py JOLISIC. WALT --* Tedromn yy JOLWIsIG IAL “yRCLOLan Y JOIST] (UN emoidug emoidng sort cereccecenscnon== AANOD teen oriieninn emir Ce = RATE ON) “41009 emoidng emeidng emoidng emoidug emeidng emei1dng ‘pajtodas fizsnoiaasd sasvo our.spbuvwmoajo fo uorisodsip youl pun snznjg COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 167 PROSECUTIONS—BOB VEAL. Warrant Number issued or sum- Final of case, Court. mons served. disposition. 1650 First District Municpal Court, Brooklyn............... July 28, 1901 Pending. 1541 Third District Municipal Court, New York City...... . Aug. 30, 1901 Pending. 1105 Third District Municipal Court, New York City....... June 25, 1901 Pending. 1527 Tenth District Municipal Court, New York City...... - June 26, 1901 Pending. 1102 First District Municipal Court, New York City....... July 1, 1901 Pending. 1531 Third District Municipal Court, New York City...... . June 22, 1901 Pending. 1106 Eighth District Municipal Court, New York City...... June 10, 1901 Pending. 1104 Tenth District Municipal Court, New York City...... . July 3, 1901 Pending. 1121 Third District Municipal Court, New York City...... - Sept. 10, 1901 Pending. 1139 Tenth District Municipal Court, New York City...... . June 26, 1901 Pending. 1120 Third District Municipal Court, New York City....... Sept. 10, 1901 Pending. 1141 First District Municipal Court, New York City...... - Sept. 26, 1901 Pending. 1109 Supreme Court, New York County..............cccecees Sept. 8, 1901 Pending. 1125 First District Municipal Court, New York City...... . July 1, 1901 Pending. 1515 Supreme Court, New York County..... furayoletetat wareiatotettetetets Sept. 7, 1901 Pending. 1114 Supreme? Court, New York Coulinty<...0.. sce <2 002s Aug. 26, 1901 Pending. 1112 Supreme Court, New York County..............cceecees Sept. 4, 1901 Pending. PROSECUTIONS—VIOLATIONS OF THE BRANDING LAW—CONDENSED MILK. Warrant Number issued or sum- Final of case. Court. mons served. disposition. 7 Supreme Court, New York County.................0005 - Sept. 28, 1901 $100 and costs, 8 Supreme Court, New York County...............e0e000. . Sept. 11, 1901 $100 and costs, 9 Supreme Court, New York County..........scsccceceecs Sept. 11, 1901 $100 and costs, 10 Supreme Court, New York County.............ccececees Sept. 12, 1901 $100 and costs, 11 Supreme Court, New York County...............cececes Sept. 7, 1901 Pending. 12 Supreme Court, New York County.............ceseeee0e Aug. 28, 1901 Pending. 13 Supreme Court, New York County...................- .. Aug. 27, 1901 $100 and costs, 14 Supreme Court, New York County................ecseee Aug. 22, 1901 $100 and costs, 15 Supreme Court, New York County.............scccceeee Aug. 22, 1901 $100 and costs, 16 Supreme Court, New York County.............cssscecee Aug. 21, 1901 $100 and costs, Status of Miscellaneous Cases. oa Ee ee Eee eee Re ee ee fe Case No. Court. Place. Remarks. M. &G. | Supreme....| Westchester county ....| Case still pending. 502 | Supreme....| Orange county ......... Action discontinued by direction of the At- torney-General. S. & C. | Supreme....| New York county...... Case now on calendar of Court of Appeals. 2 | Supreme....| New York City ........ Case awaiting trial. C.& W. ! Supreme....| New York county .... | Action discontinued March 4, 1901, on pay- ment of civil penalty of $100 and costs. C. & P- | Supreme....| New York county ..... Action discontinued March 4, 1901, on pay- ment of civil penalty of $100 and costs. SOOO es NintuH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE 168 oF T Say a eign Se oS Re a OS oo nin Bein oie. Roa Si oe Sree oe i 7 ULO 110 NT €86'T G08‘T 699 ‘6S ; Sgr - suuegenbsug Sie ‘sé 5) Sabenieeamnak) S310) 089'T 09L'T 0z8‘09 RAS ASS POUSH Be a ee * 92P SEL SE oe ea eee ee eae oll ee ae eK > oS —) o Ls) of} _ SS CeCe rrOMoa IN a J = ol i onl i J ae ~ = ~ i - MIO AON AION Hw al =] = a x co nN oD co yr 4 posuepuo0o *“H[Lou *polqqoq Sur goat indie pus wWvelo pues | posuopuod pue | -pnyour ‘y[rUr ‘SAVOUTIVA d Ya suv U1B010 SUBD epnio suBpO esvioan Aled "0061 ‘12qo700 fo yyuow ay) wof Sa04UNO0S 42Y}0 PUD SpHvOu)Ws fg YLoX MaN Ut WHaLD pun YYW pasuapuod pauajzaamsun Sy)iw apnso fo sjdraday 169 Zo°T TTTTTETT Tee eee ee rer tree eer pred qu St0ay ‘avo 190d eord w10;98,d eSBI0AVy semen cnccnccccesecssceresccowcecrerese* qienb 10d caonpoid 07 H[]UL epnsd odtAd OF BIOA VY 1): ote OIE rrrrrrrtessscccsnssesssccesesccscsssscensesnenncceoseosseecee- GHBO ‘HITT POSUOPUOS POM}JOOMSUN PUB MBaI OSBIEAR ATE werner ere eens mw mmnewnamas en nnnn een sews tan ata nena seme een ena tana ee mmaesameeeaanansnnansensne= KB) ‘yr epnio eSRi0AR Ayveq ORR RR HERE RHR RHEE HEHEHE EER EE HERES EERE EE SEEEEESS EEO E SH RHR E ER SEEEET EHTS EE EE EEER EEE EE ER OEH ee spuly le ‘suvo [810], 196'89L 865 '9Z 698'ZPL Mein: “oP emcees swownnerospemecusgecsccecepes seccecorcreccseconceccoccceves* {UI POostopnood pelojoOMSUN pus UIGeIO SUBD (BIOT, ie Reg dare =59* QIOTIG I8Q/A\ Tro ceeccesewmenscnrstccnenenceccccescnnnne sens cccsecceasccccessectessceceesn es cesses emis TOT IION rrsrstcetsc weer cettecsces secs ren enseccecsemeresccsssocetecteeccceccscecceeccocc coc: -STGBTONUSNG Grit eee tte aaenenccecseccsecceemasnneenacceccnanancecnaceccannenssuscecnccninacnssa-==-0°"="Q1180N() “ces *"*-Mlo[IBA pus yIOK MON SRO nn errr HOSIIE BOOSIE EIIIS IOC OS SSIS EO IETS IOS AISI EY Ty COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. Bui cden pave yar “Hur posuepmod puv | posuepnoo pue yt sued mBeid suey esevi0Ae ATLeEd "por9j0q Jur -pnyour ‘HILO epnis sue ‘eynor Yoo I9A0 ‘4Ue0 IOg ‘SA VOUTIVY "0061 Staquaacyy fo yquow ay) sof S99LNOS L8Y}O PUD SpHoL)WL ay) hg YLOX NaN UL WHaLd PUD YIVW pasuapuUod pauajyzamsun Sy)vUMW apnso fo sydraoay Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE 170 LST pRelinnar=nlpcicrins=slescm erie abcess om sisciniciosi sas cishen sins n resin nisin wey = sn nna esis eM ansien rey 4y310ay ‘avo aod ood ways ie 1d esRI0Ay ©z£0'°0¢ weet ee nee ee teen ne eee eee e neem ene ten et ene tenn tn een eeneetmereensereeesneeers= qupnl sod 199npoid 07 yx]ImM epniod ood eFBIEA YW 88 etter teen seer wenn ee ter en eae e renew ns mwwans we ewnn sees annensswmeeens “CBD ‘yy LOL pesuepuoo peusjoaMsun pues WeelD OF BIOA Ajrveq. 119'tz weet eww ccc cece cee w ence esses cee ces ce ee es maw aes cece sec ces cere ceescenees ceases cesecesecesnsccssscces save ‘H[IMLOpNusO OFBIEAB ALLE Z19'SBL nplny Asbo SAnAnsree reece se steisn rep scigegrec?sssicssscccns.censscosscsnssisnacstiesncsstan sages e sted pepse=*(epntyi(eBeO [BION, 981'S% Be Serer ae Pe RCE O A SAS SESS SSSR ERT SS Screen arcccieissensoesencs+.cac°*2 1 TU posuepoopene some in pus Roe vO TEI O Ty, 928°6SL ereenricnssnsnsxansicccsnclessensics/aessinunees\suns.s0(a°sno0issipnscicncnesiennsniecnvnsioe@¢asinncaesianmvmalsrinaarinnicnss arin GlTIO@UeO TOOT seteertreee tees | ceeeeeeeeeeees | ggy tog 928'6SL res ecceceennsccwencenconsccccnsccnserscwncsocccnseccccscccces consssconcermusnnrs- SYD TBIOT, rs 009 BS ees eet ODRBE TScenrsereseresocrescnsssrrecerercesrcoasceseseeszcerccsscoseneresescerssonscssocs*sSO0RN0N OUI 69 Sgs'T 668 ¥29'LP Scescesessrererscscorsrcssercesssressconescssrcessesssssrrrspsscscorspesccesecee* AGNBASIOIGOT boa PES oss 109'Sz sett se rseesceccscnsecrcecceacccccconsecccecowccesrone KOUUACMOD UOlVeILOdsuely [[opsuBy 19WMOP 8° FIZ L81 1€6'9 SPEPES Er SES ESRC SS Cee cee PePaEser sels Tre prseezesrsosesrcvercccscresrsces=*.0s cor BZ} UO()tAGbLO (OMON POL 9F9'% 83'S 68L'6L ser sieseraspesstscsuerronncecseecesoceccccsrsrrre=ss((RBG;sUOl) CLOUN ACOA DM OLFOG, ) qo Re AON, oT 660° FF9'S 16182 fopeeresissiccresrccsepcoresscrsesecrs errors sersese she” seehei Tigo ANY PUD COLUM U NOU Olu mUlelT, 010'T Pe sf eves es eam 6IE'1E ee ueauy MON ¢90'Z £20'F C6L‘6S PELSLSLS ISP PP LLP LLLP LLLLLE SUP LPL SELLS LS PLPSS PLP OS PS Says PRs eR = OAS Sess les Sven BLOGS BOM oze Seneeeeseenees | TTT MOT sone cw en ce wee: weeneee atte eee eens SPs epspse nee ressrrcevscecscrsee=rscrcecnsnsses=-eaene ¥ WIOUKION 7 v8 el 8°L L¥6'T rEP'T G26'89 - guuvyonbsng 9 9°9 TL Lf 290'F 020'9 C98 BIT oSis'sitinsisn s’pa ans) 68 sas SsanEns Rema noe eee sc OT eeetT) 019'T OLL'T 000'0S SPE ORAL LSE S PARP ELESE ELSE GES EEE PRSSPPlEe Sseelcespece: sPseasPernrerescesccs WoeLeVy pus yIOX MON [ Peer 1Zu'¢ 6LS'821 *siSitisie ecm ono esieunenscieincjacenevecsensieneaseceiesnceunneseseseniesin=nnnnnecendasnancsessenccssa=s= QT Ire *mBOd9 paw yy LUT “srUn “poy30q = sur posuepaoo pus | posaepnoo pu | -pnyour ‘HI LUE ‘SGVOUTIVY YIM suvo mvold suBO epnso suBD edeieau Alieq *oqN01 yove 1I9A0 “3U00 19g “O06I ‘taquasaqg fo yuow ay? sof S204N0S 43Y}0 PUD SpvOLjWs ayy hq YLOX MAN ut woaso puy yw pasuapuoo pauajazamsun ‘y)1wW apna fo s7dravey 171 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURD. Lis'¢z 629'9SL a rz 009 v9 PEST £°¢ G28 6 rata 919% 8£0'P 80'T Gos‘T 6bE 910‘Z 7206'S 0L6'T 88h'F . . | on oe! rror-noeowoo = - wConmawnn wa “mBeId ‘enor Youe (I 1940 "9099 19g HILO suKo esei0ae Apieqg LIS‘cz cI6 813 IST rd id ZP0'S er CUE Tae PFS‘T 281'C Scat @SL'S “yy pesuepuoo pus | posuepuoo pue ULBOIO SUBS) SER es Ree aa a Saree NS ee ee eee Oe a eae ee PY ies were see ees ee ee hired 4qd101y ‘avo 190d eord UrLI0;B[d esvIOAW worse eeeeanenccenncswescccceccreeceessess arenbd Jad 1a0npoid 0} HII epnso eojid eSvI0AW sr*-"""*-sT18O ‘H[IUI Ppoesuepuo0d peuejooMsuN pus MBI OS¥IEAB ATE Nl tte eee ed i hh ee ee eee eee eee ee eee ee eee ee “suvo ‘y]Lo1 epnid OSvIGAR Aye wooo eww e wc ene wen wesc eens cam nns rene sen cs ensccestecccecsrensee wee cece cece sees cen ecccceneneccccseces --"**-SpUTy [TB SUBD [I0I, ar MN dae oS beet ee a ee ee eee ae Bete te ee ae ee SS SON Slee AieS See's Yiu pesuepaod pousjooMsan pus MBOID SUBD [BIO T, Oe eee eee ce wens comensancces teeerereoreeness TIM OPOIO SUBI [B}OT, Solwiwislelwis\sicivie(a cia we eine wiae ciaieloie st teetsers sete eccecccctn ecm eee e er ec ee sc rs smmeeeeseos SED [B10], 689'9SL 009'81 Tots eees cc ececccccen ene eccccnssecetenercotenetes ceccesceeeee sens eeewesceonserssese=-gQgInOs 1390) Se eirisin penn cnn ie ~mmiewe ei cvicisiz i cicinlceiem AQT a AUT) SEOET| sreeseeees-Koedaoy aoneqiodsuviy, [Jopsmey Jawo0yT tren e cee twee eee meee wee sn weee BEET SUES DCEO SOON Spice TRU Cig) sy Ge NGINE srottsoss7""(1UBY DMO) PLOY 4SoA\ PUB [BINED YOK MON sroscer seers ress se2--- 119189 K PUB VAUBMBHOV] ‘OAVABIOCT £0988 pene Se Gee Ssd oan SNS JeA8s o een wm eee ccc cw nnn Foeerescceseerne see cceceecccoomeee = -QARTT ALON setter eee cee ec ec es eteeeeeeeees eres -QL0qg 489M. seeene rotten eneceescsennceenanennees rons = TIQTIWON SIDR FIQGORIGOCIR SOC OMCORS COICAOIEIIOMCO IEE ICAN GIS ICIS ORICA RAIS APO AMOS GASES SSID SEIKI | Taree YO ELVIS Tt wernt wesw eam nme mese naan wna newt ame ween ene e nena wawanaaa seams seman OTIEAO SA REA Picante ies aaa het cao rae apace tds redid y SS dod sae eat Se a ec Mae WMoeliey pue Ylox MON $9(5)- se seeencacacisiaenis arerr—" (GIT 068'E8T *parjoq out *puopour ‘yyrUL epnio suep ‘SAVOUTIVA "1061 ‘Aupnune fo yjuow ay? of S90 4N0S 49Y}0 pun SPDOL)UDA au} hq [AOR NaN UL UWDIALI pun a pasuapuood PavajoaNsun Sy)rm aPN4LI fo spdiaoay ; £2 ‘889 a a re Oo Ee a ee aon SOW MA OOD NINTH, ANNUAL. REPORT OF, ,THE ‘eynor yoo 1I9A0 "4000 19g ceettec eee eeee tee teet terete ceetenretesees etter setensteteessereceeeseceseeeeeeeserseopied gytauy ‘ato aod ootd maoyqud oFe104-y eee NT TU NO TE EOhe Say ¢gaenb Jed zeonpoid 07 HI {UI Opni0 eojid eSer0aW Be yt Son het eee Roman be = pe ak eae een TBD) “ITO DSS 18 DOO POMS BOMaICn: DIG) TAI odBi0a8 Alveq a a nO Te Oe ee BUS “yy epnio O3Bs0A8 Areq LES‘ZIL ith GRAS === b= “ane? “Hit RED o> = «Plow aR” hem deager+---sencarsoorenesenassecersconensensnaesnnsssensscesensrguiry Te St8O [BIO FD EEE ae ey 2 Re et eS GRRE FUSS SETTLE SRS naawaae ell ee.*\S ATE pesmoplon peueJoOMSAN pue UBOID BAUD [BOT “aUBbdID pue ¥[rra pesuepaoo pus | pesuepuoo pus mvo10 BUR yl sued esB10A8 ATIeq 172 ee eee | fe *pal}}oq sur ~pnjour ‘y[ro0 epnio saBy sorsssereses- 710 OPNIO SUBS [BIO T, jseatsertcnsestsesecseeasrecsescsesoresgscesegdesseseesasescerscesssessscsccacrSec@uel ROR Easisrecerecsssserecerssssopessoetssosisecsscesssicsecsorrcsscescecsceccs2.me0mMoRmentgh [PPearerserisiscrseeseessessssssssesesseseereezisszssssssrsseeesssessserccssssssess> Aone AGM MINOM Sa iae\ein anes sinieiae slelis mislninis setrreresereseccrseecce- KBdMO) UOTelodsuvly [jopaULY seWwo PT Serer cteccsecersees coesesesecscsccsesere- cee “"*]BuqdeD Aesuer AMON sorcrossssscstsesss (ney BUO[) 9104S 289A PUe [BIZNES YIOK mony srotescc sc eserercessarccecence=- 719}89 A PUE VAUCABYIV] ‘oIVAElocy Peishesaiaasseeteesccsersscssosresssesscscces: co: thread sins) prods: sao-yF ne her esouoACEn MON ree oe ee eae ere a re iicsteatstgesss ase nes teres eeresscrreeces srercescess cos yanmcanaee innsas lernate rg” $ave rACeO NOR Srasataeianscssecnascssesssnaons sec OsUey ae Te ye Ce Reet se Lp eet oe eee FOL LS FE y DU LO i AO NT: jrsisresrisrestseserececsssessorssSoospessecoscossscsecsssssscccesssesiscccsesasss Aner 1as0e OL ‘SaVOUTIVY “L061 ‘Awonugay fo yyuow ay, sof SA04LNOS 18410 pub spvoujiDs ay} fig YLOX NaN UL Was puv YYW pasuapuod pauajzsamsun ‘yjrw apnso fo sidrasay 173 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 08 T £920°0$ 116 60L‘S% SYBASE TST SHY ESE” ES Ve MtS- PSE SEB Se PP ith eR NSS pred qu diery ‘awo 10d eornd WIFI VIA osBIOAW belle ee he aaa FOC 90.0°0100109 SI DOSE RAR ORQOFODIG DEO O OAC D9 OCIIGN S50 OKC OSE CII OOASGOCRON OS WC t) zed. ag0npoid 0} H(t epni9d eod ese10Ay sreseeseemescnaacencscececnceremscrnnoscae seen samarecnsacnancecceern SUBO ‘HIM POSUSPHOD pouejJoOMBUN PUB MI¥OIO OSBIOAB Apeq Dlg EO a Sn ee oe a ee ne Oe lint a i ea, a aR as oe cies Tg cae Aa te eee ite ee nets ee ans ae AOL OO ‘yyro epnoi9 OSB1I9AB Alteq {01‘L28 da eee tet e eee eee ee eee e rece erence nee acces eee encseeeseeceees ceases eumeeecccstaacsensercrsscerrssss29e""-GDTIH [18 SUBD [BIO], ZIL‘08 686 ‘96L Ne dane ee ae Re LAGE eae Le ee eee os" >= S(T POslvepadud PouslsOM SUN DUS UlvOlO aE0 1 eI0 7, Sa de a ce en a ee ee ae hae eS ae ee ero ee eA RAAT COLDER OTL MOTE SUIT ual} a ee . . onl SHO NOD eo Crornewmon sl "9yN01 YOR 1940 "3099 Jog 686'96L 00981 tere ewww BIG BSG SOCCER FOC C CAGED IIIA AR CO AOC SOD IOI NTT) oo O10] Pe ee ne cn ene nad Pe ee ROE ERE IO COR AO AR AERO REO ER PORERE MOTTE Tl iy PRA ES ween ew ecco eee een ener" AUBAULOD,. LOlezlOdsne1 7, [TapsMeyowa py ee BIRC ORO OPE EEOC EER DOGO ROI BTR 3G OO OR AC AGO IIA SOR S Or FAME) Sesiot AON ehAASRaORRnebachenshabetasdenaaees srrsttscccses* (TUB SUO]) 910GS 489A PUR [BIIDED HIOA MON Seen da bane PeOs Re ROD A LOSDEDEDE ED RDLESE RED SUAS ORO > eae MOIOIEO Vii WIS DINE 1s Che MELT Cece coonsewscececscanens tose assent aceses aa aeas Seaaesenaanacace neauss suasucs=cea=s sary 18307, sree ssccuscorases CLOTS 980A See eee tial ainie e wisieisieee cine nies cicine cemoce came c— a= = rannnity) IGnres Teed Hone OR INT set eee cw wees Sea ansias a eueceecsede.c sec cceneewcesvn ssn cosecsscncrceqsrneren==-----—rshnie anual 180'P LPF'S 690‘IZI wees sisisis'sisisiawinisisiee's ainisienia)es eu sieisin's'einieisinln nic v wiais cin! vslnenes ce css sisiaiciceiasie en eos al ss + salpecne Gti t() 986'I GLE'T 161 ‘09 ae eee ree a eee ee nee a aces erate vocteseersss"""-TIQTIBAT Pus YIOK MON C06‘ LS6'L Z0L FFI wm weer wwe DER UR OA EOE al ROGER OD in rn l LLC OO ala OR lOO Fee On nd EOC 6 fa “mBe19. pae y[rar tat poesdepuoo puv | pesuepuod pus yw sued wWRel0 suBO esBi0ae ATV *porqj0q Sur -pnyoar "yy ra epniod sip ‘SAVOUTIVE "1061 ‘youoyy fo yyuow ay? sof Sa0.4n0s Layjo pup spvo.vws. ayy hq yuox May UL WHat PUD YYW pasuapuod puajaamsun Sy)IW apn4o fo s}diaoay NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE 174 strsbescernecstocsccinectecesdensseesertontie cocseseahenneantessconrtsteosoovsoneoo-bigd ay Siois aed Jed odjid miose[d oSez0ay Teer ce seee ec censeecnorercocessccescocece cocceccccccceccccccnsne-aienb Jod 120npoid 0} yII01 opnso ood oF8104 “seeesss"* 9080 ‘AIT pesaepaod pouezooMBUN paw WveI oFBICAL ALE 120'96 Pr tcetececeneemerencesennessedse ractensessecneensnnssnneescemaasbbibiivenscnnssnnsseccancnessneons SB ‘WU epnso edeioaw ApLeq S19 'FIS ee ee - Shibata Abdtan D mano Daan aakeat oan 2> inn 0le SMUSRCSRSelaaacessessasisesens*sosccnsksastenves gn iTwy ue gaeo 18}0L P6L‘Ee fete wee wes ee wens ee eseaewaseseseaas bbdsbsczseereseesseseses Beene SOP SEP AS ASes se Py “¥[Tal pesuspuood poucjooaMsun pas WBeID SUL [BIOT, #28082 eae wee seas Rbibeten Coe accel c en ae Sonsc kates clr ena asacceoscenekseccsinesss cc enescsscw Tt Opto SUBO [B}OT, eereeerocecoeces woaenecscecs coe POL ‘Ee $28'08L SOOO SCORERS BH OEEE EEO EEE EEE EEESEHEES EE EEEE OE EEEEEEEEE EEO EEE EE EEE Oe eee eee guvo 18107, 009, eww wwe wwerene 000‘8T Eee eee oe eae o em ccc cenecceecaabesaseaeddeevassensocacsecsiccsicssnessacessessemiagaqinny 19710 €¢9'T POP'L 680'8F ee te eee ee ee ee AoywA qayeT 288'0% Teeter ses eesesronssseccccscescccccsocccoccoossccsscoessKupdmog woyepiedsunsy, |[opsuey emo 8 8¢ BLY'S “PForancaee vo cowr ee areca aairk ranean tenn ocae nee wtb mina nisin pio sss maia aoe [e1j3009 Aesiepe mony 1L9‘1IL TERT cence sore srerewecercccccccocscccssrecrrrerrsce (BY SUT) G10GS 380M PUB [BIITED YIOX MON 608'F 996'G 818‘921 @ ee OEE OR ER CIS UO IOIICECCRRICOCOCT SOOT CHR Sane *"" 010980 PUB CUUTABYOR] ‘oe MElocy 6SI'I sesececececens | py pian wn eee eee wee ce mane ceenceeccce one poesaanaseccraeecmnsvscheme donee ueAB_ MONT 189'T 006'F GFS'CP abc cccnccenccamencccncccscccas sr erenccccccee *t*"*"910q5 180\. 662 eames cnnece -- | 126'8 tease eee wee cee ese eswnsnenee occ etre ceweececcceccces scare? t* tesco Mon sx ‘AON Ur) co Ld ios) =a ~ N ee boc) — © =: Nn PEL‘09 teow es ee eweesreseseeseassseeses wee eeeeesee Se er wee eww newwe eauvyoubsng “cl fey 926'9 9ce'LIL CPM CMH Pe Bees ewes eereeceees eee e OE OESEsS SS COSSESe OO OEEs sees eee eees se EEas OOS Ees Cees sence ol1eyaQ renonowis ° = ~ Cy = = aa a FOL'T OLL'T 0100S srrrser"s-MIQ[IVA pus YIOX MON OBG'GEL — [tenn tentttecterserecseeesesereneecssecccsceseecssansccaseeeesmaesneeaannsanannsensanennncnes eg Ama PN OD to Oe A on] oa ved aa v ~ = = a TT *m1ve10 *9]N01 Yous paw xyur *y [Ton *paqyjoq Zur 0A0 "4000 aogq | Pe8tePpuod pur | posuepuoo pus | -pnyouy ‘yyrur ‘SaVOUILVY ya suo Weel SUBD epnio susp edvi0i8 Ap1eq "LOGI ‘22“dp fo yyuow ay) sof Sd04N0S 43Y}0 pun Spoowjw.s ay} fg YLOX Man UL wWHaLD pub y)rUM pasuapuos pauajzamsun *y)1W apnao fo 8jdva.0y 175 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. —_— oo * OIs'T ce scoressoe- SOBO AITO pestiepico pouvjoomeun pas wBeID eNiioKe Ayreq ZLULZ oe He OOS eH HEROES REESE SHEETS SHS EEOSS SE SESE EEE SSH ESSEETESES BESET EHESEE ET EM SESEEE TESTES suvo HILO epnio OSBIVAB Ajwqg TSL6QR TTT TT eee eee ese eee aeeseceeeencenssececrcnscnscenceccencnccenencseccracsseccacaresscscoscoss crest [18 SUB [BJO], £28'9F CW sls sleab ein ep oabisn Semis mee scien ores Eeskes"-sugdegenbsng wesaeeee dteescaeeatersncesces se esgeerececesscccsseccceresenaceccdes se sos! QTIBIgG ei Gas AG Ae ad Se ee a ee Ce NSS SUISEIDI BOCES OSE LIOR E000000 JORIEEIO CO GUO S a CCAS IGOICC ACIS OO SIOGO So SOCIO IRSA Saye Ly ‘SavVOUTIVY "1061 ‘aune fo yyuow ay) “of $04N0$ 40Yj0 pu SpHoOL]IDL IY) hQ YLOX NAN UL WHaLd pun YUU Pasuapuog pauajaamsun ‘y)Uu apn49o fo sidraoay TTT COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. See tomas — Toe) 4 e sre nemerecrcreccccccccorccccescocrecuanscancaccaccsececwoorncrrncrosnred Wysloly ‘UBd Jod odt1d u1I10;}8/d os B10A HW Brn eeerr nee wesewansrmwacanascarsnancreoneduaasaconacccecensnnscecernacesessevrsrs VIenb Jed 190npoId 0} H[IUI opnsd oo1ad oFuISAW rrr eressrwnswcccneecenaccucawecenscccecconnss--- 8B) ‘H{IU PesMepuoo pouojooMSUN pus UIBE10 OS BIDAY Ayre ¢es‘0e BOER a hh | | 1:14) ‘qv epnio OSBIOABR Alveq. ADT hl Seriado iain late a OO a DEO LE 6. JOS JUS CG ESO ECOG SEES IEC 1 OCOD SCO S SCC EI ORCC USCS OOOOEE OT ie: FLL) GON A 68109 em ewe remem ee ees meee ewe me SUI wor seeeeereceesrrnesonsses*-HITOT POSUOPUOD POUGJOOMBUN PUB MIBOIO SUB [RIOT, ZS ‘9F6 oe Kalter Sata lets eb irdl Relea a ttlad esprit hel idonte ag ay Salle leek! Oe ae ee Re a Seen SS ieee ee el cae mre oa ee CRA ERED We LO Re aT CEE 7? postions wos} 1B eo =orescoe) GRRICOD GES ‘9F6 wt Ne ee a CS R. ~ 14 or) N ~ -_ ° st os =x = raneo omow aon ir) ~_ = 7 ‘ ; ‘ ‘ ; : Ss a> S = ior) = ire] T-} a ir} a 1D a x Son) a © a ~ 19 = O1e'T O8s‘T ogt‘9e _ wo ite} Pe) Le} u oo eo N S| a oc on 4 a uw = “u1R010 : paw yr “ypu "peg30q But SU A at posuepuoo pave | pesuepuoo pus | -pnyour ‘y[LU TOAO “40 ‘dl yyra suvo Weld SUBD epnid sue esBieae ATE TSO S OSPR RRS POR es OREM B see seers seneEsrrarsesrunnnesecccussasaasseaeesszoreuasouas quinn [#401, werepencosssepeeresrrapessccePeSperersescerssreerperesssssserecc=s toetrtesesessos gQINOR 1OTIO a a A a ne eee) 1, qsrqoT ro terersnserercemerasserncenmenssencanmansroccerncsonns KUBAMOD U0BIIOdSUBI, |[OPsSMBy 1OMOy Se ee ee en ee OE Oe eerie arin Pe ARIGUO PAGO f" ING N. trrcece seesscosernenersacesmensensersascascnsccss (INST SUO[) OLOYS 189 PUB [BLJN9 YIOX MON croc ramenesrsncsecsnscnecsecceemesersoracesns WIG AL PU BUUBMBHOVT ‘OIBALTOC peecererrrrerpoccrrecerreers Pres rrror arene nonce n 14 Sane Maen | Are fee Fe = Seem Imes ese) AGRY TY MON wo reesersssreesse==s BIOS 189M mins vaenrices S* heMe ses IGYRION CRS SISO ISIS I ta aaa KS iC OOGOOM AT tC (i fs] DOSS OOS OCU GO SoG OU Gi sa SUS UD SSE a at sula Gai ist tat Ga UCSC Ti cts 11 (By (Reece eeee sense ee eenetenerecseceansncerscesseemasrnarenasanccesessesesses MOIR] PUY HIOX MON pe etnestensaneensteeseeccemensronmersstssscsrsenanenaceccescsenensceeccecnssensecnmsenaneemen*Qrinr ‘SAVOUTIVU "1061 ‘Ayre fo youou ay? 40 f° $90LNOS L8YJ0 PUD SpHOLjYDL ay? hg YLOX MaNT UL WALD PUD YPYW pasuapuos pauajzaamsun Syprm apn1o fo sidraday 12 NintoH ANNUAL REPORT OF THB 78 221 eeuccees ROer Pepe hones Ag re eae vam ebeoee Segre oe 1 cereale eee eee aq B1d1y ‘aed ied dorad m10j}e1d esB10AV EAU He aan page iod s90npoid 0} [IW epnio gotid eSvI0AW 91ST OOO OOS EEE OEE CEE EEE EE EEE EH EEE SESE SESE E SE ESSE EEES ESE EES Sided “11 4:11} ‘qa posuepu0s poeuej}ooAsun pus mrei9 OFRICAB Ape 868'‘9¢ COCR CHEER ESE EEE EEE EEE HE EE EE EE EE EEEEEE EEE EES ESEESE SEEEEESEEEEEEEESEEEESEEES eecces cccses senses sayy ‘yw epns9 O7B10AB Alreq cette rece eee ecencserceeereoeerwes ign LZU‘Iss [aes ecswase0 55. peas sich aa naee ma eelse cna sas aannicinc-cclccinonsceuselcsccessnececenanssvccscecesasscnseercy ass) 3° ces REN IO CMON, T£6'T £12'% 85'S soc ncecccccccecccceecccccccweencncerasncoraseqasnacnnnasccncnccccarcce cent eeeeeesse- enuvyonbsug 66L'F 1p9'‘21 922981 OPO OO EEE SEES EEE SE OEEEES EES EEE SESE EESHEEEE HEH SHEESH EE EEE EE EEE SEES SH eee emer nne Oleyu¢O Tel‘ 0e2‘T ors'ee cge'P Cc6 Il 6LFP ‘6ST OOOO e OO OSs FOOSE EEE EES CE ESOE OSHS EEEOES SESEEESESESESEHSESSESEEESESEEE SEER EERE SHEE HERES eanece eng rwtoCnewos A = [onion ~ a Dons Anew _ “u1v919 ‘eynOI Wore pus 4} tu *popijoq Bay Jao ‘yu00 10,7 | P°8Uepuod pue | posuepuod pus | -pnjour ‘AlIU ‘SAVOWTIVE + dq |" yyra savo wivelo sueg | opnao suey ese10ae8 Aled "LO6GL ‘ysnbnp fo yyuow ay? sof $90ANOS L2YJO0 PUD SpvOL)Ws ay} fig YLOX MAN Ut WHILD PUD YW pasuapUoD pauajzamsun ‘y)vw apnua fo s}diaay 179 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURB, ee°T wwe swe ced sceeceee: mew ecesboccedbeaccscccccecswacecbecdvccccccocbocssibessiseosé wore nied 44 Byor} ‘aeo 10d odrid mr0s18}d esus0ay OSZ0n0S nc tee ee ee ran er ee o espe ors « ss eeree sete (eere cee Ee = veeaeesn oe cee as ae. gienub sod s90n pod 03 A] IU epNAD voIud OFRIIAY P2E T ee a a ee ee ae creereowccrecoro-o°"G0B0 'H[TOI PosMspuOd poddjooMvaN pos MBI10 OFRIOAB AjLEC 606'9Z ere eer rer rere eee errr re ree rerrrrrr ST Tere Ter ee Ty Peer merrccccccsccsceecsecccoesesrasccss GBD ‘H[L[M opnio odB1048 Alwg 62168 "Ga gg eee Rae 8 a Re ee ee oe me oe cee cctice see M10 PORMGPUOD PenososAsin Hus UIKeIO SUH [BIOT, ZS1'L08 PAO RRR OO ERE OEE EEE REE EETEEEEESSEHEES EEE EES SEEHEETE ES OEESEEEEEHEH EEE HEH EEE TEESE EETEES Hees Benen qt ephuod suBo [8107 tectses seecees | sancesesscoees | gay tan ZO1'L08 2016 SOR DIGIEE SOROS 10 OOS OOO ALAR OOO IOCG 9 2250200 GOO GI II OSI ESO FTN RLF aad 009 SS ee Se? a 1 OOO Ee 9°9 198'L 0¢0'Z LLL‘es ee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee ree ee eee ee | 6 eS Seen ae eee eee A qBA qaiqe’] ad L89 €g¢ 8F0'06 CS ES Lt wes RESET ary ee. ee ee --Auedaop uoyezlodsaviy, Jopsmuy semoyy 8° £83 OLg 61F'9 Fee eee ee eee in eee eee oe oe eee eee on se Viana ee BI OG) Ae Gis ONT 6 FI £12'F LLO'S 108‘12T Sr ln tea Ee en” Cee ee cceciebareseces= ee 29°s(MBY SUOT) GLOGG BOA PUB. [ELIMI MUO. MON: LI 88L'P PLL'E £68681 errr rrr 010380 A, Pus VUGEA Yow] ‘OIBABLOC eel't tt ae 5 ee Eee: ots Bartek te 228'T OLL'S 96x'8P Ce ee eee Tease Scine's nae here me esse se seer ce aa sence selsspeseemsiaes ances ze QU0UG, sea M 19% aah Vt BY tt | PERL FT RRR SERS SHEET TEE EEE HT ER SEEE EEE HEHE EEE SEER EEEEEE EEE EEE EE EEEE SEES EEE OH OEE EEE Ee Udo] 10 Nf 5 "9 6 9" 088'T FRU, H1Z'G Ai ga bls SC es 9 eB ea SCR cee Cee ois SC (Cu ciel 8°F 9°9 FQCBORIIOCIIBCO ICES SIGOPS SESE ISO SACOG COOP SIO OO GCI COOOL 1 1S COOCOOUSI( Tey ele) ede Y 0) rete ee eee eee re ee ee err apse /rs)-5i >) WOW ET) SNORT I osL'+ 8F9'6 9€8'zeT ere eer ere rer errr errr reer rere rer eer eer eee eee eee eee rr oueO p96 1 080'T 0S.'68 “Ee eeasesieneces scwecssessSeclMpLIUy PUS MOK MON T 8t9'F 110'6 62F ‘9ET eee rer rer ree ere rr re rere errr rr eee ee eee ee eee ee ee SSI OCILIO (yi fa "Une ID : pue x[10r “aye *pop0q Jay eynol TOBE hy 7 Pesiepaood pus | posdopaod pas | -pujour "yy1T : aG20) 0007 dRe. yu savo Tvl 8UBD eplso9 suBD SaVOUTIVE edvi0ae Ajieq "1061 ‘waquajdag fo yyuow ay sof S90LN0S 4aYj0 puv spvo.jiDs ay) hq YLOX NAN UL WALD puD y)1W pasuapuoD pauajaamsun ‘y)tW apna fo spdravey 180 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. Total receipts over all roads for the year ending September 38, 1901. Cans : cream and zy erand Platform ans unsweet- | market price} price per MONTE. crude milk. ened to producer | cau, freight condensed per quart. paid. milk. 1900. October 776,503 28,749 $0.03 $l 46 November a ee 742,369 26,598 -03 1 52 December 759,826 25,786 -0325 1 57 1901. VENDITA Gos a2 csosaooabomerod-oor+d she 756,639 25 517 -03 1 46 February 1ch-fotccosctecctctoctcts ba 688, 234 24,293 -0275 1 36 Marcleccecse rice = catcnoe en emtinae sc kis 796,989 30,112 | = -0263 1°30 INTO en Se igpononaaoo sr easonas (S008 26 780,824 33,794 -0250 1 24 IEA Gre asec CamenDoo-ceasencs + cocas 325 842,328 46,823 -0212 10 WMO tess eec pcos eeincoaneicoca ree tieemeesees 891,894 58,897 -02 117 OM acs eaters ccs cs ecics sana Hoe ber 946,532 60,189 - 0225 1 34 JTC fo onerciap ae nam soosocesose4 26 832,282 48,845 - 0236 1 22 September 22s... cote ccce te sh =e ee 807,152 39,729 -0250 1 33 9,621,572 449,332 $0 0261 $1 34 Potalicanwcrude Milky oic.5,c,s,0)eipjaia; susiejeie e.sjeieei olefin sake RMB rE Ol Gays INSPECHNS Veal ssaiscists esol siale/elelelcelseisiejes es sleiac)oje aiets/e an diniers) oidinieeteleiairis's MPMUCEVOL GAYS IOSPECEINE) VIN CELT as cicicic cis viclt'e ols vieisin oiniz)sinie,0,0)91p\«,6) .ela\e.a1s/a, «1a. sieinisiekelaieie’y IM OCLE OF 1a V A) CO Dua 2) CVAG CLG ere oteie ins os) oj=c1010)s\< nie .e)o)6\= 0,=101o/= s/n \0]e]ela(0.n\s) eiule's\ers! itioieteial pala PIMSHNOCE OF OAV St LOH On COME Gers ine) > sictelaic steletel ciel e cfelaisio's's csi s'e)s she's) ee ssisielatalequlatoletsietaisieraislac WWIMDEr OL GAVS CONSUITIN A wWIth AELOLNEY, oat)» Avis wictole clalcloiclomdile oe meteiels deleclelcentels ce Number of days consulting with Assistant CommissSioner............ cece eeceeeees POLAT HDI DOE OF (Gay Sse wctieaais cicleteleta eio.c(c,cialstsle\dicie mieisie eibtecsieloieieveis\s(elniaisieis\a/e.s sie eieisicle |. Ly) a 200 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ‘Number of railroad milk shipping stations inspected as to conditions............. 89 Number of cheese factories inspected as tO CONGITION..............ccenccccsscceccees 42 Number of butter creameries inspected as to CONGItION.......... cece eeceeeeeeeeeees 42 Number of city dairy association creameries inspected...........cceeeeeencceveevece 4 Wumber “of “milk, peddlers Inspected. cecciencacenqece sc cspiaimapsinet cu ates «ple site heme 267 Number ‘or Herds in Sp6Gted: oc cents. co eitsccescistlcdcak sme re ski mekiet aden s cemater eee 28 Number of cows inspected...........eceeecee oF ecb poised as Sw See cepa a (bop > prea aie 271 Number "of Staples! MMSPeECtOU tects ice ’cc cele s cece che ciotscacies alsieeinetretae.ae ostec eine et enn 27 Number sot i vVeals/iispeeted’: Aictecce detec cs ve sels sel tt cutevtoeautsatls ocehie ots eh ahtads Bee epee 125 Number, of vinegar pfactorics TASPECLEd. boy sl «op plce =. rye b «lecterieseh fies’ ane ofa Sas puteele ein 2 Number of dairymen’s milk inspected on delivery at cheese factories.............. 977 Number of dairymen’s milk inspected on delivery at creameries............+++++-- 1,281 Number of dairymen’s milk inspected on delivery at milk shipping stations...... 1,473 Total number dairymen’s milk inspected..........ccceececcrecccecceccececceees 3,731 Number of cans of dairymen’s milk inspected on delivery at cheese factories..... 2,551 Number of cans of dairymen’s milk inspected on delivery at creameries........... 3,639 Number of cans of dairymen’s milk inspected on delivery at milk shipping sta- elon yy Cee 4 SE See ise SRR A EP) Ce ie Be ee Ac Ane ee Mee Hs $5 SE ROR BE Fis 5 5 4,359 Number of cans of peddlers’ milk inspected..........cccescecccccecereccvecesccvsescs 833 Number of cans of creamerymen’s milk inspected on railroad platforms.......... 683 Total number of cans ‘Of milix “MSpeCled sade ocicle'e siecle clulole’etseia clos ete we ote oCaies te ae 12,065 Number of specimens of butter inspected..........cssseeeees Eh ieceshaeales ob Rigs hie aera 227 Number of barrels of vinegar inspected... 20.5.2 ..cccececcverccccsccvesccescccescccsss 414 _——__—_—_— _} Number of samples of vinegar taken for chemist with C. T. Russell and T. E. Pun. 2as5 es obis Hoek « shies «clo Selddette see e.os “A AGeBA Inn 53550 Pe OOO ntiuC Palsy joe: 6 +e 13 “Number of original samples of milk taken for chemist besides corresponding herd duplicates was 30; of the 30 samples so taken 11 were taken with other ARSDECEOUS g\'e'e'n eas rile oS Hiclgs eo Celle de ds bs einisidn 1s cab boils Ont ds obs shee cll ie elem Bees meer 30 Total number of samples taken for cChemist...........0cceccsccccncescesnacsace 43 ———— Estimated number Of miles traveled «oo: s0%.5 as ccd dp ool «clsin Bia Brine apse s snise Solebjenteles 7,421 _——_—_—_—__— } T. E. TIQUIN. Mumber 'of idays finspecting® milk 15). FVII E Ss APSA AN vate slelevalion a erpletoh 24 ae anes te este 162 Number of days inspecting veal...... alee ele teieie ooniniele etniaxs a isstaserd Mates aldara ise Mieamies pidiatginia tte 33 Number ofdays inspecting vine@arsceseasssocs sabe rcdlenee see eichbeeteeecion oda eiceh eee 21 Number of days inspecting DuUtter. 0. <. fore cer crerale ete ate oleae arake preter cgmapieve Tale ie ebeceseisise aay (mani nicioiats ine evclate terniateiste ere cis a. Lie ais ote 212 Number of cans milk inspected at cheese factOTieS .......ceeeeececeecececeeceeceeee 1,435 Number of cans of milk inspected at butter factOTieS ........ cc eecvevssevecsceveces 702 Number of cans of milk inspected at CONGENSATICS .......ceeeseeeeececceveeeceseese ; 140 Number of cans of milk‘vinspected at) CrEaINCTIES: . sic o's ieje oh iva sv iwyoraayo dow dns onsale nd sate 399 Number of cans of milk inspected on wagons of milk peddlers.................... 934 Number of cans of milk inspected on railroad trains..........cccceceessscececceeces 1,721 Number of cans of milk inspected at railroad stationS...........sceeceseecceeeecves 930 MGtaLGatis Nii, AN SDCCLGO ais ure cle nckeptaiecisiete,“isleinielolnisle'slelclatsiairia/eleoievsiaisinie lamb a aiseeieaete 6,261 — Number of samples of milk delivered to chemist from milk dealers.............. 37 Number of samples of herds milk delivered to Chemist............ssccecscscceeececs 16 — Number of samples of milk below State standard.........ccsececccccscceccecvececves 21 Number of samples of milk assisted in taking..............cceecccceceee eivielalsierate peicic 17 Number of samples of milk of herds assisted in taking............cccceceecceceees 20 BUTTER INSPECTED. Number of specimens of butter inspected..............- sect ce eee eee cee eeee se ceeeeeees 418 Number of samples of oleomargarine delivered to chemist........ Bod-dda4 4A a4c shes 2 VINEGAR INSPECTED. Number of, barrels:.of vinegar inspected. «2... decssvcsesisceiccdeesecseccessedsvle Rep A 80 CHARLES J. MORGENSTERN FROM OCTOBER 1, 1900, TO JANUARY 1, 1901. (Mr. Morgenstern was taken sick during the month of January and died on the 8th day of May, 1901. He had long been a faithful employee of this division.) Numberof days inspecting mille oc. ocrecwes ences uieaien ae’ pushes cwaclelhen ehecioaeenaae 12 Number of days inspecting Vinegar .....2ccecccccccscvcccdecs echtis ti tenicew cle oten citi 4 Number of days taking samples of milk of herds.............cccccececscececscvecees 3 Number of days obtaining evidence in CaseS..........:ccavidse. cece decspccesd ddldduciee 4 Dumber of days attendineS COUTE cscs secs pocis ses ooneisice cabins teselesoee ene setae tele 2 otal WAAayeits cacdadsseccees where ea ee a reine tens cate cece ce een ae nt Tae eee 25 tumber.of cheese: factories inspected (fetta cee: chee ch rec ceccaccmtece. eek ete noes 1 Numberiot: creaméries inspected” S2rere ee te ce neds cece cece ecenecce cee ne cena Re eeies 6 Number of milk stations inspected.............. ea accctelesioe SS fe dew evaiha slalel sane atetenist teal 2 Number of milk cars inspected........ Dani Oaiscewises oie sihie aie jpiv\e.s seins wittavetnieou Giaietk eens ale 2 Number of herds of cattle inspected.............. Ue delsceesicke untae aeaene meinceriecre sate 3 Number ier stables: inépected! +52! sexs 5 Nees i ARS eth son SAEs SARS a ae ee 3 RROD) Mee cilasina 5,5 cuieuiendisteg etahs wee Mente } SOOO NA ee pe Seca es mee 17 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 209 Number of cans of milk inspected at cheese factoOrieS ........ceeeeeeeeeeeeeers ee 93 Number of cans of milk inspected at butter factories ............... cee ee ee eeeeecees 66 Number of cans of milk inspected at condensarieS ...........cece cece cee ccscenecee 28 Number of cans of milk inspected on wagons of milk peddlers....................- 119 BT OU ACTIONS EITM Hicsefoletolnicino/sjale atciers:syeiccaiatajaisierto(e Sidietetel Sie steale Boor er uct coc coesocce 313 . Number of samples of milk delivered to chemist from milk dealers................ 8 Number of samples of herds milk delivered to chemist...............20 eee eseeeeees 3 Number of samples of milk below State Standard..........ccsseeececeeccecssceecnees 8 VINEGAR INSPECTED. MmaiervOL DALTELS Of WINIELAD INSPECLEO ceca ace cele cine ae sia e.c\ela(sieicensaciciecccwcjeslacive se ces 54 LEON D. SPINK. MAME SLIOL OAV STI SDECLING? Til Kamandaascisic saiaicsiaisialata ota (< Helciele ee cle! dis’a ateiera’ ae su ciel a Sialatelste\ diets 131 NGHIDeELOL GAYS IMSPDECEITIS VINCE AT feiss cltneleicisicls cteleiele elelsla’s fe rials siete stvlot sis cared Vertlelelel sie dale 4 tI perm Of days MSpectin= ELAS OL CALUES s-c = se ce ciclvc slcleie clelcle's clale civielslecivia Sinlstelele dial 4 NglinbemiOl GAYS ALLONUINE COULEL = ceteccele deel «cca ac teed ticles Aclcutadcclsie clsetsol cteleve« wats 7 Panber Of Gays ODLAIMINE SVIGCNCE IN" CASES sacs 0 decesade sold deidelde Sdlesvdaddeehdel ae cae 2 Number of days making complaints for PTrOSECULION........... cece cece cece cece ceens 5 Minnbercion days 'SUbptsnaims “WItHESSES” cceecicc ar celce cu sales cdialsclstelcin sictcie tins wietieiels biara ete’ 1 NENIHINOENGL Gay's 'SPCCIAl® WOLK hice cel telca cae cee Were asia eure Sects Hilla etee wale tale ielelewte dite 20 Number of days obtaining reports of cheese factorieS............cccece cess cece eeees 3 PAPAL AVS 1M SHEET 2 WITUGLOIN tale lo clelctc elelslolatctcicle'n aiclelslots!alclofalolatersrclete)sve alee clave) ste eietate sell 10 Pape CEEOL LYS ie SSN CCUIN EY | CTEAT a:c\a cclala.sarsiais/a\ =(el¢/0)e)e)ciase «) «/ csisiers,c/a.c1s «4 6:0/0) 5/0 0.6 ei0/8 side ealeiers selects sstelentala’s 3 MIMD SraCn CAMIeMIOS US DCEO caver) oars sles siersieis/>yare,eii 8 die'ese oie 8d eieislcierei s obeenetarcleteteaeleterae erneteroete 40 Renner CHEESE, TACTOLIES HIN SPCCUCH hj. a. cis/e ciciee.c cisie wivie'g vie eeiele ese cle cielo ce emcee taiocide secs 6 EAD STN ar S tat ON Simi SDECLE ere eras ofeteisirats ore oyorsia lois oieye ociafereroraisteiaictorstersiaisietete ste aetiaetels aie 1 PELTED CRUMB AUET Sri CLS ne alaialatetraiclers stelcrate s\e,3)5,«/0/s 1 0/s/eietaia bie: warm ele sintee lataralanleeiaisvelsicietahe faeces 39 INIMIDCT GAairles” ANSPECte dsr essen ans neree ate aia ees OS alle SERRA Re one wre. 39 BY Y SS mA LUCE CNP * COUT s ccs cisisideve erase siajeieiciciosclassore Rte a Fees ole SA EL Teee Bara eae tae. 6 DILY Ses SPECIAL MWOLK sass craters, tee ett oat tle aaiorate oe Se eee aes Seat Dedameme sled 8 ——————_} 218 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THD JAMES E. LANGDON. Ganspor milk: AnSPeCCed i aie etie:a'y Nisieiaps afoieipicisrs oaieiesviserace nloie)s-o)mi tn sialeiaisn ia sia'e (ors emieleipie tee ee tarieete 13,787 Barrels - VINEGFAr) INEPECTEM.. ccc okivictora icin einlwnretesi che « 6.cle'e/ninisleiriete c,h ipin te'ol als] dletels ole iele ofsiw ates 402 Packages | butter sinspectedyars...ceiies draies ovivelscisomin oso cp Giese ine slopte leap cinalenls ge eiraas . 509 Number Of Mille pINSHECTIONS,,. So x scac0 boc .c'w qeiecreeio mvc w ye wise siege Rel Mapes ee ripen ines pee coe Oy She Number Of vinezar™ INSPECUIONS, act cc ccc ccs ice sais sine se sieeve Crate cteaterera kis ofa easel vere ate anette 176 Num berisamplés tmillewbelow standards «ceils; wisi cterss: (eww destino eatin tc clelnte OSebeiee eeieik - 35 Number samples) - Milk < taken’ vcccstc cite cs seine elo tails owes wets Mk rwieininicieta'aiblete ins ote ele totale aes E 218 Nuniber samples “vinegar takenii.. 5. 20.4 eves ccs oe ve cee ones oplmlotiveeiscetebie ceed cisteae 3 NUamDeniCreanicriesn AN SPCC paso «. Sela inowsisieieim wi op oelo\a ol cin ale elnje sailor ete ia.e omni iateleai 80 Naumber dairies: ANSpected) saiscsa vis cies efis.e 01s wie-neisisyeieie nye'eie/sinle wiwelnisveywieein/eains/als/eialsiela a miacaiate 80 Days “attending "COUPE 2 ssaes cele oc cite HACE Oreo elee ete oles duets mi tinaialele alee sieyiastareeters 12 PD AVS MSDOCIANL WiOTICS <.c'eiers/oce ofarelsis tolorniovaeiere i iotsjave syeisiaisince wtoameuete to bne miale al cvorenlcinietetarenialne aiatataIale biel 10: JOHN W. SMITH. Gans of ¢milkovinsnectedss ¢ staccato s eats o vetoes epee « Seale wren te abisidisreyesiette A OHO os ic 6,356 Barrels) vinesariwinspected ¢ ce cic.cis'ss sa toxcinciolsisieta vis estas clemmierete sim ssveln oie ieteleiners alee aaare ie sae otek 281 Packages, Dutter Inspected: <2 ccacccc cee celeste tenders cde ds oa cialdescdec tides billet cterot 716 (Carcasses)sveal rimspecte Wy aaieiecic <:ctsiste s aac eticicie daisicpilss « arslonle o'eimtols\p le sio( wins hinbintisinp eeleteig ee 3,660 Number of, milik. Inspections. «i525 dene eitce ee «ttetdes otieialas er slaleis s\vin/ste (clea mip oineiataleinis sos ~ 19529 NMMDEL VINECLAT INSPECTIONS” cise d/s'ccc-viclore werent’ le oe elaistels: ofecele wie etm te GleTerajuiatnistnte ate oreinlavae intel “ 40 Humber samples) ofpmilk pelow? Standard «...<:0, mye \slale Walaa 31 INgmMbSrSAMpPIESL OL” Mi TAKEN pote ans sin! a/cthye eure aiernjaro ow vicre'eicloloersialwipieia io eicialetalolaecnmra siete 176 Nim ber 'CreAMETIeS INSHECEEM: Vache des ccna s ce cc's ace leis/e pd orale. Sib gutellcsisiclelele aeladae eee ene 35. Number, cheese ‘factories, Inspected orc... ccte cre s eidate.e cassie isin b:0 1 cieth etnc-0 spine o eiaeetncieie sinters 9 Mumber milk stations: INSpPECKEC |p sieejs5cs/e« a5 csr aisle olor esusen.ssainis orseuleie sigielels tleta aie saan 10 Number barns tinspected 2:5.’ irslislosise co ciletsniels a necibete sislaie toc Sem = Meee Rew ees etad ane 29 Number dairies “Inspected iy s..cicts:s. vns.s seis steyew «s,s wiple'y are etoeye ere weelp cities s oieloisia ie eet a ete 29 AVS VALLENGINE GOUSELS sennecs oe elena: nls sieleeccie wate octave maeeen en nersa tee tenets 6 Dayewspecial Work. sss sis * 04 411,830 Wells-Fargo Express, COMpanyies wx -psjeitaeiesoe # oes 1,747,200 United States Express Company...............+6. 400,000 BEVEL 5a. 750 iin > 05x oh wipe lisip pede belorie “bent > Woaeere 2,200,000 PURE ayaa ats. s nips SRL 0 5 Stes esta cane Bn shan waa ae 12,117,365 SSE —eeeEEOeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeeEeEeEEs COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. uh 223 FACTORIES. There are 61 cheese factories and 17 creameries in this divi- sion, the surroundings of which, with one exception, were found in good sanitary condition. The one exception was an Italian cheese factory where conditions in vogue were uot of the best, and the proprietor was instructed to place his factory in a clean condition and protect the cheese made from exposure to insects, as the law prohibited the exposure for sale or the offering for sale of any unclean dairy product. All of the factories have not been inspected this year, but it is the intention to have them all thoroughly gone over at the beginning of the next season. The few complaints that have been made were attended to imme- diately after notification. OLEOMARGARINE AND RENOVATED BUTTER. But little oleomargarine or imitation butter has been found in this division during the year past. Systematic and thorough inspections have been made of all places likely to have either on hand for sale or use, such as commission houses, hotels, railroad freight houses, express depots and restaurants, but except in one instance we have failed to find any. The one instance was the finding of three boxes of oleomargarine in a railroad freight house, but it was found later, after close watch, that the stuff had been sent here through a mistake and it was returned from whence it came. At the same time our agents discovered a number of tubs con- taining oleomargarine being transferred from one railroad car to another for shipment to a city in the interior part of the State and in another division. The Assistant Commissioner of that division was promptly notified, with the result that the party to whom it was consigned was found with it and was obliged to pay quite a penalty. It having come to my knowledge that lake steamboats plying between Buffalo and other lake ports outside 224 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE the State were serving their crews with oleomargarine while tied up to the docks in Buffalo, notices were sent to the managers of the principal transportation lines that they were violating Section 28, Article I, of the Agricultural Law, and that in future the law would be strictly enforced on all boats within our juris- diction. Following these notices an inspection was made on the ‘boats with the result that six of them were found still serving the stuff on the crew’s mess tables. These cases were referred to the Department at Albany for proscution. A great quantity of so-called renovated or process butter has been on sale in this division, and as a rule the original packages have been found marked as required by law, but in many in- stances, as in the prints, the law has not been fully observed, the words “ Renovated Butter ” being placed in an obscure part of the paper covering the print and sometimes entirely hidden by a fold of the paper. Again, rubber stamps are used which, while conforming to the law as regards length of letter, violates its spirit by making the letter in hair-like lines and does not fulfill the clear intent of the law in requiring that the words “ Renovated Butter” be plainly seen. Again, on the markets, the mass of butter is emptied from tubs and exposed on the counters for sale with good butter unmarked contrary to law. Some of the most flagrant cases have been reported to your office for prosecution. The excuse these marketmen give is that if the process butter be marked it can not be sold at their price, and if they do mark it they lose trade while their neighbor at the next stand with the same material unmarked has no trouble in selling. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 225 VINEGAR. Frequent inspections of vinegar factories and of wholesale and retail groceries have been made with the result that one of the factories has gone out of business besides paying quite a sum in penalties, while two others are now being prosecuted for making and selling a spurious cider vinegar. It is believed that a vigorous prosecution of these two concerns will prove that violations of the vinegar law by them is not a very profit- able business. Outside of these factories but little adulterated vinegar has been found. A few cases of cider vinegar bought of farmers on the market have been found a little below stand- ard, but as the article was otherwise pure they were not prose- cuted. A number of retail grocers have also been found with bad vinegar, but in every case it has been traced as coming from the three concerns mentioned. In some instances the grocers were backed by these factories, and all such have been referred to you for prosecution. BOB VEAL. We have endeavored to see that the immature veal law is observed. Some prosecutions have followed. Most of the veal used here for consumption is brought in by express companies and by wagon from near-by towns and villages. This latter requires strict watching, and for that reason this division is in need of the services of an expert bob-veal inspector. CONTAGIOUS DISEASES OF ANIMALS. This division has fortunately been free from any serious out- break of disease among animals during the year. One or two cases of rabies were reported from Orleans county, Murray township, occasioning some alarm, but prompt action on the part of the health board of the village of Holley, and of this Depart- ment in the village of Hulberton, in quarantining suspicious animals caused the alarm to be quieted and a disappearance of 15 226 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE all traces of the disease. One case of supposed tuberculosis in a cow in Wales township, Erie county, upon investigation by this office turned out to be a case of rheumatoid arthritis, with considerable emaciation. One case of supposed actinomycosis or lump jaw in the township of Colden was found to be a swel- ling in the jaw due to the presence of a foreign body bone. Two cattle were reported as having died of anthrax at Beach Ridge in Pendleton township, Niagara county. A local veterinarian was called in by the farmer and adopted precautionary meas- ures. I investigated the circumstances attending the case, and while not prepared to question the diagnosis made by the veter- inarian, the people there believe the animals died from overfeed- ing on green plants which may have been poisonous, and the symptoms described by them would tend to corroborate the con- tention. The bodies had been destroyed when I arrived on the ground and no post-mortem was held. BARNS AND COW STABLES. The general condition of cow barns has been fairly good, but there is room for improvement in ventilation and surroundings in many of them. A few complaints have been investigated but in each case were found to be groundless. A number of barns were inspected by the agents and myself that were found over- crowded and with unsanitary floors. In each instance the defects were pointed out to the owner and as a rule were remedied by them. This is an important part of our duties, as an overcrowded and unventilated barn is a menace to the health of the animals, producing among them a weakened condition and a less resistent power to bacterial invasion, as in bovine consumption, for instance. This is a subject that might well form part of the curriculum of our farmers’ institutes. The special agents on duty in this division were employed during the year as follows: COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 227 & th = A a ue = ss A Bikls 4 thonal-t ba er anf HOW EMPLOYED. 5 =] oa 3 5 sal EN gh nel he IN wel Sab p> Sdaor pce cibe ive paw s = = 3 S Milk. At railroad stations, cans inspected ........... piwsae8 994 1,195 1,640 1,406 1,195 On wholesale wagons, cans inspected............. 96 130 45 140 130 On peddlers’ wagons, cans inspected . 2,037 2,693 89 | 2,338 2,741 In grocery stores, etc., cans inspected. 138 53 70 185 53 In milk dairies, cans jnspected.................-..---- 30 28 3 41 28 Milking of herds witnessed, number........... eco 7 5 2 9 5 Samples of milk delivered to chemist, number..-....... 45 64 10 56 64 In cheese and butter factory, number................. DUDA sscktty | tsces. (Ga) Pe Total number cans inspected............ eeaswaee 3,386. ~ 4,104 ~ 1,849 4,187 4,152 Vinegar. In factories) barrels. 69s. 222. 32 to 5. oe BREE Bee) 6 21 14 13 21 ERISLOLEN; DTT] Se wn as0 « ons wens alesis dad aenise pies oe pains 46 155 20 45 155 Vinegar samples delivered to chemist, number........ 15 33 17 15 33 Total number barrels inspected ........-. Semen 52 176 bee 34 58 176 Butter. In stores, number specimens..........-....20.-2s.00-- 303 1,109 52 485 1,109 In hotels, restaurants, etc., number specimens........ 197 286 25 136 286 Tota] number of specimens.........-.....--.0- = 500 1,395 "a7 ~~ 621 1,395 Anapecting vealfdays..cs5. 252. ese. 103 RE 10 17 5 7 17 Special duty—Inspecting cowbarns contagious diseases, MiG), GAYS 5.) cosameponcecescssouaccocisesees 6 Sonacoods 67 31 58 29 28 Gathering evitlence; days? 22.252 te. eee 12 2 16 Ue iecaeeee AtCend ino COUTIACAY AIL « -astiscews suet -neeeees- sleek: 5 13 9 ll 13 Whole number of days inspecting...................-- 180 212 81 210 220 Whole number of days employed..........-. feeoos 874 275° 169 264 278 PROSECUTIONS. The following cases of violations of the Agricultural Law have been made, settled or otherwise disposed of during the year ended September 30, 1901: MILK. Case No. 9684.—Discontinued by direction of the Attorney-General. Case No. 9688.—Herd No. 1415.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. Case No. 9678.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending on calendar. Case No. 9677.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $26 costs. Case No. 9696.—Herd No. 1416.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and costs. Case No. 9551.—Herd No. 1417.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $30.10 costs. Remains unsatisfied. Case No. 9695.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $26 costs. Case No. 9552.—Herd No. 1418.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $25 costs. Case No. 9700.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. Case No. 9555.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. 228 Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE "9556.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. 9564.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25. 9567.—Herd No. 1420.—Pending. 9571.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $26 costs. 9566.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $15 costs. 9573.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $20 costs. 9572.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $15 costs. 9577.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25. 9699.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25. 9561.—This case was not served, as the People’s counsel thought best not to because the sample was not actually taken from the defendant, but from a grocery store where it had been sold by defendant. Case costs. Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case No. 9580.—Herd No. 1419.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $25 No. 9581.—Herd No. 1419.—Discontinued. No. 9585.—Herd No. 1419.—Discontinued. No. 9588.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $27.22 costs. No. 9591.—Herd No. 1422.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. No. 9593.—Herd No. 1423.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. No. 9587.—Herd No. 1424.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. No. 9689.—Pending. No. 9708.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $26 costs. No. 9713.—Herd No. 1421.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $26.84 costs and disbursements. Case No. 9596.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $26 costs. Case No. 9715.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $85 and $21.50 costs. Case No. 9721.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $75 and $26 costs. Case No. 9728.—Herd No. 1427.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. Case No. 9726.—No action taken by counsel as defendant was accidentally killed on railroad in September, 1901. Case Case Case No. No. No. 9740.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. 9736.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $26 costs. 9738.—No action taken by counsel as the defendant was accidentally killed on railroad in September, 1901. Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case No Case No. No No. No. No No No No 10654.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. . 10661.—Herd No. 1432.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. 10658.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. 10663.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. . 10673.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. . 10677.—Recommended to be discontinued on payment of costs. . 10684.—Herd No. 1433.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. . 10685.—Herd No. 1431.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. . 10694.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recommended to be discontinued upon payment of costs. Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case Case No. 10764.—Herd No. 1608.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. No. 10785.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. No. 10786.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. No. 11302.—_Herd No. 1475.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. No. 11303.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. No. No. 10787.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. 10310.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. No. 11313.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. No. 11317.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. No. 11321.—Herd No. 1610.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. No. 11320.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. No. 11325.—Not referred at date of report. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 229 VINEGAR. Case No, 2280.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25. Case No. 2279.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25. Case No. 2282.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 2289.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 2272.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 2292.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 2271.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 2291.—Not prosecuted. The following additional vinegar cases were made during Sep- tember, 1901, and referred to the Commissioner of Agriculture September 27, 1901, pending designation of counsel: Nos. 2242, 2243, 2244, 2295, 2241, 2298, 2239, 2364, 2365, 2366, 2367, 2368, 2369, 2370, 718, 719, 2234, 2235, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2240, 2299, and No. 1, Ninth Division, barrels containing vinegar not branded. OLEOMARGARINE. Case No. 3612.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. Case No. 3701.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. Case No. 3751.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. Case No. 3613.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. Case No. 3614.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. Case Ng. 3752.—Referred to Commissioner of Agriculture. RENOVATED BUTTER NOT SO MARKED. Cases Nos. 1, 2 and 3.—Referred to the Commissioner of Agriculture. BOB VEAL. Case against Fred. Unger.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $25 costs. Case against C. A. Schintzius.—Not prosecuted. Two cases against C. G. Golde.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. Prosecutions which were reported in full and pending at date of the last annual report, have been disposed of as follows: MILK. Case No. 8339.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $106.40 and $26.50 costs. Re- mains unsatisfied. Case No. 8258.—Herd sample No. 1470.—Pending. Case No. 8268.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Compromised and settled for $50 and costs. Case No. 8267.—Supreme Court, Hrie county. Compromised and settled for $50 and $25 costs. Case No. 8273.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Judgment entered by default January 18, 1901, for $100 penalty and the costs. The defendant subsequently offered to com- promise this case in connection with another case against him, and it is held under consideration. Case No. 8278.—Herd No. 1471.—Pending. Case No. 8279.—Herd No. 1473.—Pending. Case No. 8283.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Judgment rendered for $25 penalty and $25 costs. Remains unsatisfied. Case No. 8285.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $40 and $26.62 costs and dis- bursements. Case No. 9612.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $60 and $27.24 costs. Case No. 8286.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $10 costs. Za0\- Nintro ANNUAL ReEpoRY OF THE Case No. 9607.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $25 costs. Case No, 9605.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $25 costs. Case No. 9626.—Herd sample No. 1474.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $90 and $27 costs. Case No. 8264.—Herd No. 1487.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Judgment entered June 28, 1901, for penalty of $50 and $30 costs. Remains unsatisfied. Case No. 9630.—Herd No. 1493.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. Case No. 9521.—Herd sample No. 1490.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $10 costs. Case No. 9522.Herd No. 1475.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $25 costs. Case No. 9529.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $25 costs. Case No. 9514.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $25 costs. Case No. 9532.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $100 and $26 costs. Case No. 9524.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $15 costs. Case No. 9548.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $25 costs. Case No. 9543.—Herd sample No. 1499.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 9530.—Herd sample No. 1500.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $20 costs. Case No. 9544.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $75 and $25 costs. Case No. 9662.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. Case No. 9673.—Herd No. 1482.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $26. costs. Case No. 9658.—Herd No. 1412.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $25 costs. Case No. 9668.—Herd No. 1414.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $45 and $25 costs. Case No. 9676.—Herd No. 1413.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $27 costs. Case No. 9681.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $15 costs. Case No. 1.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. Case No. 2.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. Case No. 3.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. Case No. 5.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Pending. Case No. 9632.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $12.50 costs. Case No. 9517.—No action was begun in this case by instruction from the Attorney- General. Case No. 9523.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $12.50 costs. Case No. 9540.—Held by attorneys pending disposition of a similar case as test. Case No. 9654.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $25 costs.. Case No. 9671.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $25 costs. Case No. 9672.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $75 and costs. Case No. 9338.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $25 costs. Case No. 6140.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $27 costs. Case No. 6106.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25 and $5 costs. Case No. 8216.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $100 and $86.22 costs. Case No. 8310.—Supreme Court, Niagara county. Recovery $25 and $20 costs. Case No. 8239.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $26.50 costs and dis- bursements. Case No. 6112.—Pending. Case No. 7511.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $113 and $26.50 costs. Case No. 8279.—Pending. Case No. 9517.— Discontinued. VINEGAR. Case No. 2259.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 2268.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 2270.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $25. Case No. 2273.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 231 Case No. 2277.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Cases Nos. 2278, 2284, 2285, 2287 and 2289.—Recovery $25 in each case. Case No. 2273.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 2274.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 2275.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. Case No. 2276.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Discontinued. The following cases were made previous to the present fiscal vear but were omitted from the last annual report: Case No. 7568.—This case was referred to Albany, but became outlawed before coun- sel was assigned. Case No. 7518.—Supreme Court, Niagara county. Recovery $25 and costs. Case No. 7520.—Supreme Court, Niagara county. Recovery $25 and $18.20 costs. Case No. 7065.—Pending. Case No. 8174.—Pending. Case No. 8173.—Pending. Case No. 9693.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50] and $25 costs. Case No. 9680.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $26 costs. Case No. 9533.—Supreme Court, Genesee county. Recovery $35 and costs. BOB VEAL. These cases are referred to in Mr. Patrick’s report as in hands of counsel for prosecution. They have been disposed of as follows: Case against J. W. Rosendale.—Discontinued. Case against John Brooksopp.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $26 costs. Case against Anthony Herlein.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $23 costs. Case against Erick Walters.—Supreme Court, Erie county. Recovery $50 and $105.70 costs. A recapitulation of fines and penalties collected and judg- ments rendered during the year is as follows: Fines and penalties collected for adulteration of milk St talogs shatters 2,220 00 2) Fines and penalties collected for selling adlutera- SID A OTe aN STEV Ged eat Foe ah ee D2 aha cv gcd te She « 9) « ‘4 sro) 4 9,8 200 00 Fines and penalties collected for selling bob veal. . 200 00 Total fines and penalties.......... PEST, aioe $2,620 00 Judgments rendered and outstanding............ 444 40 Total fines, penalties and judgments......... ; $3,064 40 —————— Respectfully yours, JOHN H. GRANT, Assistant Commissioner. Report of James P. Clark. Hfon. CHarues A. WiEtinc, Commissioner of Agriculture: Dear Sir.—I have the honor herewith to submit my annual report for the year ending September 30, 1901. The industry and efficiency of the agents of the Department have materially reduced violations of the Agricultural Law in this division during recent years. Outbreaks of anthrax, which were prevalent in this part of the State last season, have been nearly if not quite suppressed by inoculations conducted by veterinarians in the employ of the Department of Agriculture, very few cases appearing in this division during the year. There is a much better appreciation and @ more hearty cooperation on the part of the farmers in preventing the spread of contagious diseases of animals than ever before. The method of controlling such diseases by means of inoculation is just beginning to be understood. Information furnished this division by Assistant Commissioner Hughes of Rochester, N. Y., led to the admission of the sale of oleomargarine by Mr. Josiah Hess of Belvidere, and the volun- tary payment by him to the Attorney-General of $100 penalty. A careful watch has been kept of the places where veal car- casss are in transportation or offered for sale, but no violations of the law have been found. Dr. William Henry Kelly was called in April to examine sev- eral cattle and horses in the town of Busti which were exhibit- ing symptoms of a somewhat peculiar disease which was puz- zling to the local veterinarians. He pronounced the disease cerebro spinal meningitis. A number of scattered cases of probable rabies appeared in Chautauqua county during the latter part of the year 1900. The utmost care has been taken to prevent the spread of this dreaded disease. All animals known to have been bitten by suspicious ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 233 dogs have been either confined, muzzled or killed, and the out- break did not become serious until the month of May, 1901. On the morning of May 8 a dog appeared on the premises of Mr. H. M. Butler, about three miles west of the city of James- town, biting three cows owned by him. This dog was wounded at the time but later in the same day returned to the place where he belonged, and after being kept in confinement for a couple of days and exhibiting no further symptoms of rabies was killed. Knowledge of these circumstances did not come to this office until after the dog was killed. I have given the cireum- stances somewhat in detail to show that a dog having rabies does not at all times give manifestation of the disease, as is com- monly believed. The owner of the cows was requested to sus- pend the sale of milk for a time, awaiting developments. It was afterward learned that three cows owned by Mr. Townsend Jack- son, living near Mr. Butler, were bitten by the same dog on the same day. , A telephone message from Dr. Frank Hunt of Jamestown on May 31st gave information that one of the cows owned by Mr. Butler was showing pronounced symptoms of rabies. The other two cows in this lot had been transferred to a farm in the town of Stockton belonging to Mr. Butler. The party in charge of them was immediately notified that he should make no sale in any way of the milk from the cows in question. The sick cow was killed with the consent of the owner, the brain being removed by Dr. Hunt and sent to Dr. V. A. Moore of Ithaca. On June 20th a report was received from Dr. Moore confirming the diagnosis of Dr. Hunt. All of the six cows which were known to have been bitten, as well as a horse belonging to Mr. McIn- tyre, the owner of the dog, died after periods of incubation rang- ing from twenty to eighty-five days. Several animals in the same vicinity died with pronounced symptoms of rabies about the same time, and it was thought probable that they had been bitten by the same dog. The brains of two dogs in the city of Jamestown which were exhibiting symptoms deemed suspicious were removed by Dr. Hunt and forwarded to Dr. Moore, who 234 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE reported rabies from the inoculation after periods of incubation of twenty-three and forty-eight days. Much time has been spent in preventing the spread of this much dreaded disease, and the work of Dr. Hunt has been of material aid to the Department. Dr. C. R. Perkins of Warsaw, while in this division on some other work, appeared before the common council of the city of Jamestown to give information relative to the danger to the inhabitants from the spread of this disease. The council enacted strict quarantine measures, appointed a dog catcher and estab- lished a pound, authorizing the dog catcher to capture and place in pound all dogs found running loose without a muzzle, and to collect from the owner the sum of two dollars as a redemption fee. The towns of Busti, Ellicott and Kiantone were quarantined by this Department and notices posted. The town of Ellery was quarantined by the local authorities, and an aroused public sen- timent generally has aided materially in suppressing the dis- ease. There have been no cases since early in September that have come to the knowledge of this office, and it is probable that dan- ger from the outbreak is over. In response to a message from the manager of the farm in connection with the Chautauqua County Almshouse at Dewitt- ville a visit was made to that place and it was found that the lungs removed from a calf, which had been slaughtered to fur- nish food for the inmates, showed unmistakable evidence of tuberculosis. Dr. C. R. Perkins of Warsaw was sent by this Department to investigate the case. Another calf which showed physical evidence of this disease was killed and also found to be tuberculous. With the consent of the county superintendent of the poor, all of the cattle at the county farm were examined by means of the “ tuberculin test ” by Dr. Perkins, July 22d and 23d. Three out of the herd were pronounced tuberculous. These three animals were appraised by Mr. D. P. Witter, Appraiser, on Sep- tember 20th, and killed in the presence of Dr. Kelly of Albany, Dr. Perkins of Warsaw and Dr. Hunt of Jamestown, and all showed unmistakable evidence of the disease. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 235 It is very important that the statute relative to having an appraiser in the employ of the State present at the time of the examination be followed closely, and that all animals which are condemned be killed at once. A number of vinegar and butter samples have been forwarded to the chemists for analysis, but no violations of the law in either respect have been found. Farmers and dairymen were much disappointed at the failure of Congress to pass the Grout bill, but all are ready to renew the fight with hopes of success the next time. The work of the cheese instructors is always well received and productive of good results. Regret is often expressed that more of their services cannot be obtained for this division. The cases reported in last report as pending have been dis- posed of as follows, as reported by counsel: MILK. Label No. 5897.—Recovery $100 and costs. Label No. 5893.—Recovery $25, which remains unpaid. Label No. 5898.—In same condition as at last report. Label No. 5899.—Case closed. Label No. 5934.—Defendant taken into custody and lodged in county jail about two months. Label No. 7963.—Recovery $25 and $25 costs. Label No. 7967.—Recovery $50. Label No. 7983.—Recovery $50. Label No. 7369.—Recovery $50. Label No. 8209.—Recovery $50. Label No. 7310.—Defendant has left the state. Label No. 7315.—Recovery $50 and cests. Label No. 7316.—Recovery $50. Label No. 5949.—Recovery $50. Label No. 10001.—Recovery $50. Label No. 7382.—Defendant absconded. Label No. 5945.—Still in hands of attorney. Label No. 7373.—Recovery $50 and costs. Label No. 7317.—Recovery $50. Label No. 5939.—Pending. Label No. 7313.—Recovery $50 and $25 costs. Label No. 5941.—Recovery $50 and costs. Label No. 5942.—Recovery $50. Label No. 7319.—Recovery $50. Violations of the Agricultural Law found during the year have been disposed of as follows: Label No. 10008.—Recovery $25. Label No. 10002.—Recovery $50 and costs. 236 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THD Label No. 7962.—Judgment of $25 with $25 costs. Uncollectiblé. Label No. 7311.—Pending. Label No. 10008.—Pending. Label No. 7364.—Pending. Label No. 7325.—Recovery $50. . The following violations have been reported to your Depart- ment for the prosecution of which counsel has not yet been designated: Label Nos. 7958, 7350, 7952, 5948, 10004, 10005, 10006, 5946, 7953, 7331, 5860, 5866. Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number Number REPORT OF JOHN E. KRUSE, SPECIAL AGENT. of cheese: factories, ANSPECted .\ieact ie. se ok oleeldle ere selec loice oloele cis eicatacielaaiatece aac 76 Of utter TAactonios ciNSpeCteds 6 s:seiieder ope oh a.e,0's seine sie aihole's dens map micnias on . 8 OL CIUIGS Avg | WIAs eS mITISPECUCU scte viscls)oic\clwisielelsioievele wiclersleieie s/atele'alsiefefaletaieie/eraieie ete 24 Of SHIPPING) STATIONS TNSPECHEG4)0:2:0)0 Havel ha 0 ots fe’nibib tole taba) s olalelo| sletels Male OMe teen Ad 3 OLPGAITICS ARSROCLCOE fae aces opted 07 viedo eid cies ns nein sicinas hc ja ele ereleie eels aie aerate 20 of stores, hotels: and’ restaurants: INSPECECM «oo .ciecie teen ore cle los on siclele ielelelee ete 215 ofsamples, of tm vinspected Si Goh... Petes. s St hci dado Chichte os Aeutle ae Oe wee 2,635 of samples of butter inspected... esp. acc cc .cecs soca sciscics oc clcp 6 vuie siesteeisieisie , 398 Ol Saniples: OF + VINGLATAINSPVECCCE ors cine 'eistrisiele cole nie.oise svt nelotteseierelcleracaetdie Sete Ciena > 254 Of Seals: UNSPEGECD: Wafers acto: injeieseb Se is'cis Daicdetsi's = eieiste leis iojojossfaletelcisieieissnicioie eee 4 77 of samples of milk sent to chemist taken at butter and cheese factories. 18 of samples of milk sent to chemist taken at dairies................ Sevan: 18 of samples of milk sent to chemist taken from dealers...........-.+++0 +: 2 of samples of butter sent to chemist.......... a feataa fais icealuincs oh oie 5 I wish again to express my thanks to Agents C. B. Wakefield and John E. Kruse and to Chemists Hugh C. Troy and John A. COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 237 Miller for the interest they have at all times taken in the work of the Department. Also to Drs. Kelly, Perkins and Hunt for the very effective work they have done in this division and the valuable information imparted. Yours very respectfully, J. P. CLARK, Assistant Commissioner. Report of William Henry Kelly. Hon. Cuarites A. WIETING, Commissioner of Agriculture: Dear Sir.—I herewith respectfully submit to you a report on work done by me for the Department for the past vear. BLACK QUARTER. Twenty cases of black quarter were reported and investi- gated. Prior to vaccination 10 calves, 65 yearlings and five two- year-olds died from black leg. In a number of cases the diag- noses were made from the history, as those that had died had been dead for several hours, and post-mortem changes had taken place which would prevent a bacteriological examination or an intelligent post-mortem examination. The following vaccinations were made with black leg vaccine, the vaccine being furnished by the United States Bureau of Animal Industry, viz.: 65 calves, 125 yearlings and 50 three-year-olds. The reports which the Department sent out relative to black leg seem to have been of some benefit, yet there are a number of farmers who do not realize the importanee of immediately burn- ing or burying in lime all animals that die mysteriously, but this should be done for the reason that a number of pathogenic bacteria are spore producing organism. The spores, or what might be called eggs, live for a long time and under favorable conditions will develop and thereby produce the disease from year to year. Then if the carcass is left undestroyed, the disease can be spread over a large territory by dogs, foxes, pole cats, crows, etc., as all of these animals are naturally immune and feed upon the carcass. The contagion is spread by the above-named animals carrying some pieces of the carcass to some distant place. ACTINOMYCOSIS. Four cases were investigated, and prior to my visit two were killed on account of their debilitated condition. During the early Spring, in Lewis county, there appeared to be an enzootic ANNUAL REPORT OF COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 239 of this disease in cattle. Within a radius of a few miles at least 30 head of cattle were affected. In one stable in which there were about 30 head of cattle 18 were more or less affected. The owner stated that last fall upon putting his cattle into the barn he noticed one especially with a bunch on the jaw. A little later another was noticed to be similarly affected. The disease continued to spread until over half his herd were dis- eased. Jtist prior to my visit he killed one, as she could eat but little and was very much emaciated. The cattle were per- mitted to take any stanchion, which might account for the spread. After a few of his animals were affected he read an advertisement in some stock journal recommending some pro- prietary medicine. This medicine was guaranteed to cure. Under this treatment the animals gradually grew worse and the disease spread. I recommended the iodide of potash treatment and the barn and stanchions to be disinfected, and that the diseased cattle be kept apart from the unaffected. The affected animals soon made a good recevery and no new cases were reported. The disease appeared when the cattle were fed dry feed, which is in accordance with Imminger and Claus. The hay was cut from a swamp. Freidberger and Frohner stated that some observations suggest the idea that swampy districts are fayor- able to the development of actinomycosis. It has been stated that actinomycosis was not a contagious disease, and that at- tempts to transmit it to other animals have been without re- sults. (Rivolta, Bollinger, Siedamgrotzky, Perreencito, John, Ullmann, Bodemer, and Bostroem.) Cattle, calves, goats, sheep, pigs, dogs, cats, rabbits and guinea-pigs have remained healthy after inoculation. The posi- tive results obtained by Ponfich, Israel, Rotter and Hanan are, according to Bostroem, simply resideal and encapsuled inocula- tion nodules. In this outbreak it appeared to be in the form of contagion. As this disease is communicable to cattle, pigs, horses, sheep and man I ordered the milk boiled before using it. ; 240 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THBP EQUINIA MALLEUS (GLANDERS). The majority of cases were isolated. In one instance an undertaker took his team and put it in a farmer’s barn, with an old gray horse, several miles from home. The gray horse had been owned by this farmer for about a year. During that time he loaned or hired it to his neighbors to work with their horses. None of these animals showed any symptoms of disease. About two weeks after the undertaker’s horses had been stabled with this gray horse, one was noticed to have a nasal discharge. After using the ordinary remedies without the desired results a veterinarian was called. Not having had glanders in his vicinity, and not knowing that this horse had been exposed, he treated it for distemper. A few days later his attention was called to some ulcers on the inside of the hind leg. This aroused his suspicion and upon a careful examination he pronounced it glanders and so reported. As soon as the veterinarian was satisfied the horse was suffering from gland- ers, he immediately isolated the sick from the well. To do this be had to put the remaining three horses in a barn with some others. I applied the mallein fest to the three exposed horses, also the two others that were in the barn. . The three exposed ones gave a typical reaction, were condemned and post-mortem confirmed the diagnosis. After the necessary measures were taken to prevent further spread of the disease I immediately ascertained the whereabouts of the gray horse. I found him upon a farm about twenty miles from the home of the undertaker. Upon making inquiry I was informed by the owner that while this horse at times had a little discharge from his nostril, he had worked with the various neighbors’ horses for over a year and no such a thing as symptoms of glanders had been seen. Not only this, but he had been tied under the store and church sheds without any apparent spread of the disease. I made an examination of this horse and found some cicatrices upon the Schneiderian membrane. I informed the owner that the symp- toms were very suspicious and I would have to make a mallein COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 241 test. This was done, and the animal gave a typical reaction and was condemned, appraised and killed. The post mortem confirmed the diagnosis. I made inquiries of the neighbors rela- tive to any other cases and they stated that they knew of this horse working with various horses, but never knew of any suspicious cases in any of the horses with which it had worked. I called upon the health officer, a doctor, who stated about the same as above. He also stated that he had used this same gray horse with his own horses during his spring’s work, and that lately he noticed a discharge from the nostrils of one. I made an examination and found both of his horses suffering from glanders and they were immedi- ately killed. The hotel proprietor informed me that about two years ago this man’s son purchased this horse as having glanders. This old gray horse had been owned for several years by different persons in the adjoining towns, yet no infection had been noticed until this year, when five horses contracted the disease. One died, the other four were killed upon the mallein test and the post-mortem confirmed the diagnosis. Glanders is essentially an equine disease and affects donkeys, mules and jennets as well as horses. It can be transmitted from the horse to many other animals, including man, either by direct or indirect infection. The following animals are susceptible according to the order in which they are named: Field mice and guinea pigs, cat tribes (including lion and tiger), dogs, goats, rabbits and sheep. Pigs and pigeons are scarcely at all susceptible. Cattle seem to be immune, and in several instances glandered horses have been put into cattle sheds and never has there been a well authenticated case of glanders in a bovine recorded. ‘House mice, white mice, rats, domestic fowls and linnets are also immune. Pathogenesis. Glanderg can be transmitted directly or indirectly through different medias, such as harness, clothing, pails, stables, water- 16 . 242 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THR ing troughs, currycombs, brushes, feed, stablemen, neck-yoke, etc. The discharge from the nostril and ulcers on the skin (button farcy) are highly contagious. The bacilli has been found in the various organs of the body, also the blood, but it does not occur unless it is generalized glanders. The respiratory organs are most frequently, in nine-tenths of all cases, the gate of entrance for the virus. (Friedberger and Frohner.) The bacilli is prob- ably inhaled and lodges upon the mucous membrane. It is claimed that the reason for believing that an attack of catarrh, distemper, etc., predisposes an animal to glanders is on account of the inflammatory condition of the mucous membrane and makes it more favorable to enter the system and develop. Experiments to transmit glanders by direct inhalation of the respirated air of glandered horses have been negative. It is claimed by some authorities that the bacilli of glanders can penetrate the uninjured mucous membrane. The bacilli of glanders may enter through the skin, when thir glands of the skin become infected. It used to be called “farcy,” but as we understand the pathology and bacteriology of the disease there is no difference between glanders and farcy. The same germ will produce either or both named diseases. Very rarely does glanders penetrate the body through the digestive canal. Viborg, Gerlach, Liantard, Cudsae, Malet and others have made such experiments, but in the majority of cases the results were negative. Some cases are reported of transmission through coition. Whether the infection took place through the genital mucous membrane, or whether it occurred through inspiration it cannot always be decided. Glanders may be either acute or chronic. In the acute form the animal usually dies in a short time. There is a rise of temperature, nasal discharge, ulcer upon septum nasi. In the chronic cases the aninral may live for months or years. The animal is usually unthrifty, slight discharge from one nostril, rarely both (bilateral). The amount of discharge varies and COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 243 may cease entirely. The glands (submaxillary) on the inner side about midway of the lower jaw are hard and appear fixed to the bone. The nasal discharge may change its color and be streaked with blood. Ulcers are seldom found on the Schnei- derian (nasal) mucous membrane, yet quite frequently cicatrices of old ulcers are found. The predisposition of man to glanders is not very great, yet there are several well authenticated cases recorded. Several veterinarians have been inoculated, and only a few years ago a man upon Long Island, who posed as a veterinarian dentist, contracted glanders and died from the result of it. When the symptoms are not well defined mallein is used to aid diagnosis. In an outbreak where there is one or more wel! defined cases all horses that have been exposed for a few months succeeding the outbreak are submitted to the mallein test. Mallein is a preparation made from the bacilli of glanders (baccillus malleus) and was first manufactured by Kalniyg and Hellmann, 1891. It is analogous to Koch’s tuberculin. The temperature of the animals that are to be tested are taken prior to injection of the mallein (initial temperature). Two cubic centimeters of mallein, as prepared by the New York State Veterinary College, is used for the average horse. Eight to 10 hours after the injection the temperature is taken every two hours for 12 consecutive hours thereafter; if there has been no rise of temperature the animal may be considered free from disease. If there has been an elevation of temperature 2.5 degrees above the initial temperature, and there is a large, hot, hard and painful swelling at the seat of inoculation, with constitutional disturbance, manifested by depression of spirits, debility, loss of appetite, blowing and muscular stiffness, especially of the fore extremity on the side of inoculation, the animal should be condemned. In case the tem- perature rises and remains elevated we should continue taking temperatures for at least 24 hours after injection, and in the event that it is still far from normal the animal should be quar- antined as suspicious and re-tested not earlier than one month 244 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THB Respecting the swelling at the seat of inoculation, Mr. Fadyean says as follows: g “Tn interpreting the local reaction to mallein attention must be paid to two points, viz.: the extent of the swelling and the period at which it reaches its maximum size. The rule that regards the first of these is that in the non-glandered horse the swelling that forms at the seat of infection is seldom or uever more than three inches in diameter, while in a glandered horse it is seldom or never less than five inches in diameter, and not rarely it is nearly twice that. The rule regarding’ the second point is that in a non-glandered horse the local swelling attains its maximum size during the first fourteen or sixteen hours ::fter the injection and then readily declines, so that it has nearly or altogether disappeared by the twenty-fourth hour. Ina horse suffering from glanders the tumor continues to increase in size to about the thirtieth hour after inoculation; it persists for two or three days, then gradually recedes, and does not finally disappear until the fifth or sixth day.” Mallein is very useful as a diagnostic agent; while it is not an infallible test, yet it has given very satisfactory results to the Department. A number of its charged failures are probably due to some misunderstanding in the use of it. The following shows the form of temperature record for mal- lein tests used by me: 245 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. ‘AN ‘ANVATY ‘TUNLINOIAD VY JO INANLAVAAG ALVLG HYOX MAN *‘pouMopuod oq JOU JSNOI OFS PUB OstI 0} ATOXIT St oIN{vIod MO] OT} }8O} OT} SULINP Jeoy UL SoMOd o1vM BIT ‘“WOIZOOLUT UTE][eM SarMoToF o1ngvIEdUI9} Jo MONeAGTa UB MONS AVM HOTMAIL 30 SYIOM MOTB ULq IT qnq Snolepar[s jou solv _ “pomojsnoow uovg oavy oy) YOIUA 0} ¥Vq} IvoM oINiLIOdMIO} B UFSIYFNVIp Woy cols gdoy pue AprejnFe1 pos0ywA ‘pooy Jo esaeyo [BI19IVUA YOY ITM 989} ON} SaLInp jdoy ov S[RMIGe oY} 4ryY UEyeZ oq PlMOYS ov “UOIye|NOOU! oY} Jo JeeN OG) IY FUT[oms [usu & OsTY ‘sopisqus A[[unpeas #1 Woy} PUB SuNoY Jo ToQuINU oTQLIAvA B JOF SoNUT}UOD oINZVIEdMo4 YSIG eYT, UWorMooefar 103zB 19}v_ IO ANOY 4404 OY} OF YIXIS O43 Woy SuruUIF0q eunjesed “U10} JO OSI [VNPKIS B oq P[NOYs 104} poLopUB[S SI [VOLUE OY} JL “SINOY OATOA} UOJ JOIJVOIONY ‘SINOY OM4 ATOAG 4SOTUO] OY} 4¥ Jo ‘xn0Y AJOAO ULeTe puB UeZeI 6q plnoys ounjesiedm9; oy} UoLQIefar O42 JoIye SINOY 44519 0) XIG ‘eyvaoNsodoad opvur oq LeU Esop Of} S[RUILUE JOIAREY JO 104A] 40g ‘os10g LivMIpPO ON 1OF "00 @ SI MLoT[VM Jo osOp OYT, “plow ofoqavo prnbiy out ‘esulIAS OY} WoIZ JI SULAOMIOI INOITM ‘o[poou 04} dip 0} JuoioTNS SI 41 19}}¥] OY IOJ pur posn oq um prow DTOqIVO FO MOTZUTOS %¢G BAOTIIOJ OY JOY "[eMIUR Yove Suyoelar 10938 e[poou Oy} pue Surtsn e10joq poyoozursrp Ajjnzouvo oq plnogs osu1As8 ogy, *oovld yuormeAdoo Jogo Ade Ut Jo ‘ouRM oY) YYvoMEg YoU OY} JO OpIs OY} JO O[ppral OY} TO ONSST SUDSUBINIGNS OsOO[ OG) OFT OFUTIAS OTMIOpodAy v Jo SuREM Aq MIOT[VUI OT} qoofay -ULOT]VU OY} JO WOVaysturmMpy og} Surpooeid sIMoY OAL} JO S[VAIOJUL YB SOUT} INO ‘GuolaeA ToD JI ‘sengesedme} oT} OY" T—NIATIVIT DNISQ YOa SNOILOAAIG "4801 puov0g , wg mMoqy = |/gTOT = |Fzor—|p'zor e0or |Fz0r — |9'zot 908 |ca'dg izoo1 |-avoy |oozt or sea oo so eeeeeeeres* THOT v9 noqy ——|8"101 Zor |reor joeor |orgor ‘(|F'e0r 908 |*m'dg| oor |-> Ava loorr P Sica ale aia at whe (9G, oe |e Sel Tae we lh ee Peo eee ee a oe ee ae ane aye a A Stl ee eee IE see] ¢ P| p b z ra Or 8 is) oi mG alee Bee a eet & i “SuITJOMS [voo] eos ee 3 “IVWINV a0 jo juoyxG : ‘106 ‘OT axaHO asd | ANVN ; socnee ee ACE “aq auxnoueny | Bo zs NIQTIVA, DNILOUCN] URLAY TAOLVUAdIWAy, NIQTIVIN ry 5s “SUT[JOMS osIVT } “SUT[[OMS OU JO [VU x cot cot FOL |FOT P POL |8°SOT |F'EOT cor SOT |Z°SOT |f°COl |9°SOT |FSOT |SOL TOT -- Avg |OOTT a |¢ oC hcoctey ea sie a <0 85 reTPACCT IAS toi. fo: 's.8 a epee woe ke 94 For music, $50; attractions, $110..... 160 For State Association, $10; water rent, $10; revenue tax, $8.34; ex- pense, postage, entry books, etc., ee ak ral xs eo acs) s\e, «Ss 50 For salaries: Secretary, $75; treasurer, $25; office assistants, $6; police, $19.50; judges, $39; superintendent, tos Helpers, ete; $9; totals 4 2M. us: 181 Hor race purses (horses) 0900.8. Jol). 431 For premiums on horses... $228 00 lor premiums on cattle... 291 50 For premiums on sheep... 90 00 For premiums on swine... 109 00 For premiums on poultry... 67 50 for premiums on farm pro- OR OE 2 A A 2 Oe 38 65 For premiums on dairy MOGULS: Le As cedure shen. 1 00 lor premiums on domestic. 89 25 For premiums on flowers. . 23 65 For premiums on fruits.... 2 50 For premiums on miscel- MAC QUIS. 5 hs a sacielo Mesa UA G2 64 29 00 51 00 56 50 00 259 $2,570 80 $272 74 260 Ninto ANNUAL Rerort or THE BROOME. RECEIPTS. Hrony gatewecelpis iis. .2 a5. . Soho e $1,912 37 Krom iwrentior privileges. .:\.’./.". dade: 437 00 From entries for premiums.......... 111° 25 From stock sold during year......... 105 63 From entries for races (horse)........ 370 00 Prom hay, straw and feed: ... ..'c..7): 61 27 Prom WonatiOms !... ONT. vos c ane he 10 00 Pr ORE US CATE oF ie lark haaeige & Ss os See 1,824 05 ‘Eotal receipts, . 1). sarisegett 06 Sesion es DISBURSEMENTS. Balance due at close of fiscal year 1901. $15 81 For payment of notes or other obliga- LODE M20 a dabble ieee AE ROS BB 186 00 For hay, straw and feed (v.02 .52... 201 55 For permanent improvements........ 51 40 For dues to State and National Trot- ting Association and licenses ...... 28 33 POrUavOr she .c ft ce ta ee ee See 190 14 For material o.... 20 2« Ih ae 2 Sheek o> SS Mor rent of eroumdse .. sc. a2 s.. 3 -Oek 200 00 Porvattiractions! ...5\5.. See tate nea 219° 50 For printing and advertising........ 202 36 Porinsuranee: tris sete aoe ee oe es: 30 00 For salaries: Secretary, $150; treas- urer, $100; police, $45.50; judges, $68.50; superintendent, $106.37; helpers, ete., $55.50; totals... 525 87 For race purses (horses)............. 1,000 00 For premiums on horses... $268 00 For premiums on cattle... 495 00 For premiums on sheep.... 75 25 For premiums on swine.... 56 50 $4,831 57 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 261 Yor premiums on poultry... $404 00 For premiums on farm pro- OEE Dal. ERS IED.. och 50 40 For premiums on dairy Producten eee sae tie 10 00 For premiums on domes- UGUD AL Aaa Melietdlo a's 232 CRIES 191 25 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... 135 00 For premiums on flowers.. i ig rar For premiums on fruits.... 47 45 For premiums on miscel- PANE OUST EO. «AE eRe 323 40 LS OLEH erally ER a RN ot $2,074 00 PRGtal CISOUrSCMENtS: «2.25.32 ROGERS «26 seageneh oe. & $5,026 95 Bs ACA TCO MICO MU yoko nats 2325 6 ces lb bg soe a ee oe $195 38 eS SS CATTARAUGUS. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900...... $255 13 HOM ate receipts! Wve. Ge-AL ei v.08 $1,813. 14 Hrom rent of crounds: iA AMS 2d 0 63 50 Prom rent Of privilegeselsso. os. ..G 4% 571 50 From entries for premiums. ......... 794 00 From annual members ...:.......... 10 00 From lumber and hay sold........... 48 43 From entries for races (horse)........ 298 00 From bonds issued, notes given or any OLNGE ODM CATION) ce ccofvdecls cies e's wld he 344 30 CONTA HOP Sagan rAerateAH TD «ous sles’ 1,487 42 BPOESIPEN— LOE VIO. o's. aiseere bis ess oeissiseld sve e Gees 5,430 55 PEGEAMREECUDES ele oe ote doo 5.0 ce ao aca o Guarewis wire $5,685 68 262 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other obligations ....5.3% t+ Me bess sis, $609 61 For permanent improvements ....... 244 52 Por TabOr ss soo se eies «+ bs OE soe ces 497 22 POM MIACEEIAN pee ae ours: sc vis coc eet eee ATT, b2 For printing and advertising........ 313 17 For special attractions, band and ball ATHEE AER te Sac pele wie wgcns sede wus) sieie 576 50 For taxes, $22.05; dues, $32.25; insur- ance, “Gao o eOtal >... ante glee oes 113 25 For salaries: Secretary, $50; treas- urer, $30; office assistants, $44; police, $98.90; judges, $2; superin- cendent, PLOES Aen Total. oo. cm enone one 331 22 For race purses (horses)............- 1,465 75 For premiums on horses... $108 50 For premiums on cattle... 352 50 For premiums on sheep.. 95 00 For premiums on swine.... 37 00 For premiums on poultry.. 17S 95 For premiums on farm pro- ducer ol BRE. OS 39 75 For premiums on dairy products cit E6818. 2.6 15 95 For premiums on domestic. 293 60 For premiums on imple- ments and machines..... 3 75 For premiums on flowers.. 3 75 For premiums on fruits... 5 95 For premiums on miscel- ATC OVIE oi fon doe wale ns 20 75 MOURN cas sais tis eh «> ote mace ba6 sas 1,155 45 Total GishUrsemrenteirercces . Ao 6.5 oe eS oe leiese cede euacere PeMaMCe ACERT) i-a5'o's 55 bo a oe KR eee ee $5,484 21 $201 47 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 263 CAYUGA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL CORPORATION. RECEIPTS. Rom sate TECeIpess sy oie Mell se. 2 4 $1,958 Brom rent of privileges':2 4.3 i4.c..5.0. . 250 From entries for premiums.......... 86 From entries for races (horse)....... 117 From bonds issued, notes given or any OEREr (GbligaHON, «:cje0h.. 0's ye esjs.00 00 3,000 MPiybal TEG@IDUS: 2/5, 2nteie sis stcesveueseainis's Sao ses + 2.8 DISBURSEMENTS. OTE yord onecits seivs naitietard a's .o,0 0 nies oe te cee: 266 MaresMverest OW NOE <2. 20d o2o. Pee: 23 Rormsenitertaimments,..... bald)» Soeice a8 $173 00 25 280 00 Pope OCC CNPRLS pete amet alae wleteiara cies ate 'erc 2:6 e1s%. a = eh DISBURSEMENTS. Balance due at close of fiscal year 1901 For payment of bonds, notes or other MDMA TONS sy « < yore neers > «FS <= For printing and advertising......... For permanent improvements and re- For material, supplies and general ex- PICMIEe eiionus aoc civarsin ore eiela «8 S/9) ake el Por imternal revenue Tak. oo... ce ye For National Trotting Association... PGI UATE ATCO: «256205151 e4slensieue egexesas9yeeyeis.oK0 For salaries: Secretary, $100; office assistants, $71.75; police, $86.50; judges, $118.34; superintendent, $12; helpers, etc., $148.50; total......... For race purses: (horses)............' For premiums on horses... $370 50 For premiums on cattle... 789 50 For premiums on sheep.... 274 00 For premiums on swine.... 226 00 For premiums on poultry. . 360 49 For premiums on farm pro- CUTE AE A ee a 230 00 For premiums on dairy IE GOMGES. «AAs a nepe (200 sss 52 50 For premiums on domestic. 522 15 537 805 00 $9,082 96 272 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For premiums on flowers. . $56 60 For premiums on fruits.... 62 00 For premiums on miscella- MLC OUR. cic pet eos oete oe G 157 00 40:1 eee Me ee ete eh $3,101 34 Papaldisbursements 64.0. 4cie re ede Sa $8,985 Balance (Ceediijia.: (same ee pot tak ae $97 DELAWARE. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900........ $292 PEON Sate TCA owes cs oe ee se $1,153 93 From rent Of /Srounds'.).). 5.0... ee 68 86 From rent of privileges.').........:..:. 157 50 From .entries for premiums.......... 141 00 ELLOI MOTESP CAVED at supe eek Sais Sa 1,844 75 Prod babe eA AOR Ene oF courte 1,749 09 Receipts for TOON «og ake th ne hh hbeewk coheed 5,115 oval orecetptse: t.c oo ster Ba so. ocr aoe been $5,407 DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of notes, $1,025.51; inter- GSt, DIDS 22GMUGHEL 65 cos. so eo eo oat $1,178. 73 POR AOR os 0. iiss Ss aoa soe ERE CE oe 362 61 Hor material 2.00 3 05 soaps eee sn ees 318 06 For attractions, baseball and band... 265 00 For State Association....... sciieh conve 10 00 K'or printing and advertising......... 297 21 For salaries: Secretary, $60; treasurer, $20; office assistants, $30.50; police, $80; judges, $99.55; president, $50; PO ere itis a be ty el wie aie ah nce econo ee 340 05 For race purses: (hOrses)... 0. in'aw os 166 00 I’or premiums on horses... $354 30 Hor premiums on cattle.... 424 25 60 36 86 13 99 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. For premiums on sheep.... $192 00 For premiums on swine.... 96 26 For premiums on poultry.. 144 08 For premiums on farm pro- 18 273 TREO! eros aA aH Hehe) hie wionsvs 112 08 For premiums on dairy ROGUES i S.l. Te cee ks wise 23 00 For premiums on domestic. 274 17 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... 149 65 For premiums on flowers.. 19 09 For premiums on fruits.... 76 98 For premiums on miscel- Raneaus: . oA Si)... 0 3d.bte 592 98 PEt ess ale) oe SER gains eee ne $2,458 84 LEC UP VT ONTS] oes 200123 00 Raa hy a A $5,396 50 BSAA TREE (CLCUUL) «5 sie Pe MS 6 SS insnats tyetag viene $11 49 DUTCHESS. RECEIPTS. Palance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $62 12 Pron cate receipts.) eee SI $5,726 50 Krom rent of privileges) 27. 00.2.2: 493 62 From entries for premiums........... 1,622 69 Promr advertising ss... eee ets ees 3 206 76 From advertising unpaid in 1900...... 20 00 POM GONaATIOUS | «6.6. Me eee ee 540 00 From bonds issued, notes given or any GUBEK OWE AIIOMN 2-51.) cis de iaste o's )a ete 5,500 00 MEO SMILE too! sas 440s! ois Soke Gale lel abiiela, 3 or 4,286 35 PSCC OUSObOI LOO PHA ried aaa ae lew ee were 18,395 92 CET PGi (G12) 01 eas eR 9 A a $18,458 04 274 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other ODM GATIONS (oc 3s csccens 9a ne ew os ops POP ACECACHONS << oo ee.5.s. cere eee oe For advertising and printing aheteke ¢ © 0 OP VAD OO ANE ORES hile s een oe eae HOE miaverial Mt fo A BR Hor rent of srounds. 2). .66 ele. . 936 78 For salaries: Secretary, $200; treas- WPCte, pL ly (Ota: pA crt A Net cecpetot cere 325 00 Mor race purses (horse) "...0 2. . 2... 3,855 00 For race purses (bicycle or other) in- eluding cost of ‘:prizes../ Seer. 36 00 $16,319 86 $16,396 06 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. For premiums on swine.... $256 00 For premiums on poultry.. 477 00 For premiums on farm pro- ULC aoa ae « «aerate 181 75 For premiums on dairy PROC UCU e, ois:s u/s: weyeiig, 14 6 + sfoepm tetas UG baler CORI E See. erg a eee so ciel din cai e ey weet DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other GWMeAGIONS, INLEGESE 295 ic se. ss $230 00 For permanent improvements........ 2,913 50 i) io”) -| $15,997 95 $398 11 $1,350 64 5,704 87 $7,055 51 288 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For postage, $34.91; stationery, $21.70; telephone, $7.44; total.)... .......... LECT gig 02 01 an a ge 9 A a For material and incidentals......... For delegates and dues State Associa- tion, $34.59; internal revenue, $8.33; printing, $328.95; music, $275; at- tractions, $426.62; insurance, $52.50; water, $25; office, $31; total....... For salaries: Secretary, $100; treas- urer and chairman of managers, $100; office assistants, $85.25; police, $106; judges, $68.31; superintend- ent, 80; helpers, etc., $56.22; total.. Mor irace purses (ROrses). 24.2.5 ...1.45 26 For premiums on horses... $239 00 For premiums on cattle... B75 00 For premiums on sheep... 27 00 For premiums on swine... 63 00 For premiums on poultry.. 2 00 For premiums on farm pro- GHEE. Sec2 Gt omeeeemen yk 60 25 For premiums on dairy products LO ee secs 5d 00 For premiums on domestic. 222 75 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines.... 54 50 For premiums on flowers.. 76 75 For premiums on fruits... 40 25 For premiums on miscel- PAMCBUS 500 t's ss 35.0.5 39 50 STG A hak fie cx wt Se Bors, ke bi A ensis Total disbursements’ ..s ¢.; Mies cv © ace cas Balance (Mew Le a8. LS ee \ 1,181 99 595 78 817 50 1,335 00 ©. whe o .» Wt eNece ie DS 6s ee Ee he COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. — 289- HEMLOCK LAKE UNION. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $3,405 79 Berean SAE TeCCIPUS .).'. oe cage grocge so $464 50 meom rent of grounds... 220. 5...0% .. - 40 00 EronrrentiOl privileges. ¢ 2... oi... 341 00 Hrom-annual members. :. 2 ......+.: 884 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 135 00 From interest on deposits........... 54 27 LT T3712 1 ee er 1,497 85 PEC iptsetOE LONI eo ay kas ios vos So ag eae oo ba 3,416 62 UGG PEC COUPER Core eRe alas Is aos asia ae «oe aa am Me $6,822 41 DISBURSEMENTS. Balance due at close of fiscal year 1900 $21 00 For printing, advertising, stationery BA DOS EAL MeN elk hte os ot Ie ot 158 50 Hor purchase of land....:...¢¢3!39°R3 1,600 00 For permanent improvements........ 284 00 For special attractions and band..... 350 00 LENT GHG | 6104 Mae $0) Bart: GR ee Pea ie 248 86 POP Material bY REE. oe eeke ks SY 225 58 For purchase of grand stand......... 675 -00 For forage, $66; dinner tickets, $72.80. 138 80 For salaries: Secretary, $35; treasurer, $35; office assistants, $10.25; police, $70.25; judges, $85; superintendent, $80; helpers, $13.50; total.......... 329 00 For race purses (horses)............. 575 00 For premiums on horses... $238 50 For premiums on cattle... 150 00 For premiums on sheep... 154 00 For premiums on swine... 36 00 For premiums on poultry.. 152 75 19 290 NINtH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For premiums on farm pro- CES EA OSs aise nheee on 6 $38 25 For premiums on dairy PLOCUECTR 2.2L We at ate 10 25 For premiums on domestic. 193 55 For premiums on imple- ments and machines..... 13 00 For premiums on flowers.. 19 25 For premiums on fruits... 40 00 For premiums on miscel- taneous’). Lees 0 6 7 50 ROE A an ioe lc cpeas ax dees oda geben delete nen ks $1,053 05 BROOKFIELD—MADISON COUNTY. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900...... From gate receipts... ooo. ce! $1,775 Frony rent’ of privaleges .. i.<24 Sans 265 From annual members. .2...6.0.0.05.. 142 From entries for races (horse)........ 414 From grand standsr... 2. 08. ee ake 351 From State™ ooo es os ocd eRe 1,510 maceipia for 1900 inc jis... soa tobe Reins fae ates Total Treceipteess 06.5 be henner tee Eyeee DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other Onligatiohetcwnwisisin ius: eee doers 5k $593 For permanent improvements........ 167 MUG WOOL «lea ccc Atk Le eee 145 e- 04 77 $5,658 79 $1,163 62 $34 85 4,457 91 $4,492 76 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 291 PLO WA ECTAMING fakes s ot Sole als, cles ec esala ve $392 43 For special attractions, music, etc.... 593 00 For salaries: Secretary, $43.22; treas- urer, $30; office assistants, $21.50; police, $27; judges, $51.36; superin- tendent, $67.63; helpers, etc., $53.47; CET EE SR i RS st aT 294 18 For race purses (horses)............. 950 00 For premiums on horses... $176 00 For premiums on cattle.... 285 00 For premiums on sheep.... 80 00 For premiums on swine.... 24 00 For premiums on poultry.. 130 60 For premiums on farm pro- MRCS Har Aceh IY 400) ©) Sse Sh82 71 45 For premiums on dairy AAG OMAULC ER LS Hae ers. ava epeteed 3 50 For premiums on domestic. 222 00 For premiums on flowers.. 18 10 For premiums on fruits.... 12 75 For premiums on miscella- ° ME OMIO MN orouss o's os os eas 3 hes 40 45 1 B02 le aR or IRIN Sfloc ae arena er 1,063 90 STO GHRGISDUESCIMENIUS, «occ cess + bee eee v0 saw gers $4,199 32 Balance (credit) ........ 14) PEER rer or: $293 44 —————— MONTGOMERY. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $162 91 BEOM ULE TECEIPUS. he Ne he eS $838 70 Brom-rent of Prounds 22. e266... 10 00 rom rent‘'of privileges... is... ks 134 35 292 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE From SnnialPmentoers. cosh acre h $83 From life mémbers... .. ./....09 9. aeUe 40 From entries for races (horse). .....'.. 30 Prom hay sold i22/ 2.572 00RD ara: 127 From State c's vn 2. ss EEE: eles 1,711 RECEIPIS HORROOI IE 5 344 beats oF AN eos oo baa eee Lotal meceiptan A. «, gy. iqneGers Del s isan ee DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other obligations; interest . . 42). AGs.... 5. $260 NOT, WUSTET SE DA EG oui hades 2 lanes oh cet 146 For permanent improvements........ 98 Or PRINS ej. oa eee is be eee 109 Bor aor. Pitas rc oe ale eee 343 Bor Material ee. e se EO eS. ot 106 For special attractions (97-95... 7. > 124 For base ball... 25.2. Se Bee 200 Pornmiscellancouse ese. os neal. eee 104 For salaries: Secretary, $125; treas- urer, $40; office assistants, $25; po- lice, $10; judges, $24.50; superintend- ent, $114.25; helpers, etc., $25; total. 371 Mor.racexpurses) (hOrses).......:0.6...¢000' 200 For premiums on horses... $118 00 For premiums on cattle.... 95 50 For premiunis on sheep.... 35 00 For premiums on swine.... 53 00 For premiums on poultry.. 65 00 For premiums on farm pro- Gee PP oe 92 75 For premiums on domestic. 159 35 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... 8 00 00 00 00 95 30 33 25 73 Sf 75 00 é $2,975 03 $3,187 94 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 293 For premiums on flowers.. $75 20 ‘For premiums on miscella- MEOUS NS iret FEM. 6 nicl T1 25 BURG Re vets: 0 3) 5a cs ay 01 de peg eee Ie A a $773 05 Meta CinbUFSeMents: sire dae hres cece ee vl $2,838 33 ance (RUeMIb) . jesse scsesagas 4 sig tar +4 $299 61 a § MONROE. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $321 74 Pon et TALCOTECELPULS’. «. « «visa sia'g) ee s/d eres $2,403 48 Brom Tent Of SFOUNAS . 42.5 440,25 «ss alsa 60 70 Prom rent of privileges. \o. si... «6.5 472 00 From entries for premiums.......... 529 07 Erom annual members. ...0 2. 0606 6s 95 00 Prom Mie MEMPETS. 0.6.0 se 2 ena cne ves 12 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 502 50 From entries for races (bicycle or RRM gate eho an ora soya he's siheianai anes stnkyy> 10 04 From bonds issued, notes given or any CBT TS: OME A LTO <3) or. «5 stoi 2p er sho, aie os 1,100 00 EEO VEAL PEE Mel casas weg sap seg ae 2,024 96 SreGeipiseror 1900). eye s5cs senses sess sas ols slarldbie 7,209 75 EG EAN FECCUGESY cle Ge veg vos sccssansies cestode $7,531 49 DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other UTS A CGI Riley tieds ce eb e v'a'e viele ware « $1,846 53 For permanent improvements........ 72 26 For hay and straw wi. jie. cele 54 71 For labor, general repairs............ 179 66 GT) POMEA SOT PANS 3D ..0,- <0» pial viata elale 17 00 294 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For advertising, $282.55; insurance, $70.93; interest, $131.80; total...... $485 28 or AtwACtIONS . >. 76s. si Peebe es ee 424 88 for general Gxpenses.|:./, cee eee 560 47 For salaries: Secretary, $100; treas- urer, $25; office assistants, $50; police, $85; judges, $127.50; helpers, BOC e L211 SOs LOtall. i. h.tersictteetsteleiotstote 509 00 For race purses (horses)............. 1,150 00 Mor tiiek Te pars ct An ae cctociaen aa bee 34 12 For premiums on horses... $673 00 For premiums on cattle.... 385 00 For premiums on sheep.... 192 00 For premiums on swine.... 144 00 For premiums on poultry.. 116 30 For premiums on farm pro- CO os icestcn giao sia Sie ee 38 25 For premiums on dairy PTOUUCTS 0 a ryse.tc tee es Sr 23 50 For premiums on domestic. 342 15 For premiums on flowers.. 54 50 For premiums on fruits.... 120 00 For premiums on miscel- IAC ONS) iso pct ous ere sis 43 15 AOA. art RM ccc hs od dat hve A dad 2,131 85 Total-dishbursements scree: oo x oy Ads were Ee $7,465 76 Balance. (Credit) oi.00.¢ ocike ne penne de ete $65 73 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $9,478 12 From gate:reveipts i. Ue ass aes $127 25 From rent of grounds, buildings, etc.. 7,791 63 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. Prom annual members. 7.75... . 2... foe $385 00 F'rom interest on United States bonds BUBBA ATICOR hc. 5. oo steer sie! + 0 caine 421 60 From miscellaneous aes Pathe eae sia 19 25 PIPSERLE GS. fo. cs dca oie oc.e cies 1,962 97 Meewetee fOr) 1900.0. 5. t ce ten teee eens ess wlohe eee eet TECELES ..''.*..ereteartatetetatel ae ete os 'ce ~ caia aeie DISBURSEMENTS. For general maintenance ............ $5,376 94 For Sixty-ninth Fair (1900), Berkeley iceman, 2M). NUTR. . 2.x ee tee eae. oo: 1 10 For Seventieth Fair (1901), Berkeley Pycewm. . S25. ...5.¢agaase sates 250 54 For salaries: Office assistants, $3,170; helpers, etc., $116; total........... 3,286 00 For premiums on poultry.. $42 00 For premiums on farm pro- | Le Sones s aS A 224 50 For premiums on flowers.. 1,266 00 For premiums on fruits.... 303 00 SB Gy pee ect t erate cps i Al's, = & spalaasl s 1,835 50 Total disbursements aia Tt Ane atc e eens A laNCe (CLEDIL) = os ioe wing Bole ini m eyeom ny toere orate NIAGARA. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... EON CALE TECEIPtS. 6.06 os cis cee cee eine $1,121 95 From rent of grounds and privileges. 282 20 From annual members..... Wee shia tee 28 00 CO. MLE MICMDCES cic cc cle cides. ce sale ere 50 00 $10,707 70 $20,185 82 10,750 08 $9,435 74 $5135 54 296 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE From entries for races (horse)........ $470 00 irom GN atiODR 2 ices} cb icieateil aca oF 35 20 From bonds issued, notes given or any OVA UT ey RAED INE (Le Wet cio RPE ewer LAUR Ts 1,750 00 From State a Soca oh ae Baa 1,473 33 mesrmineor LOO. oka ees gens oe ue be ee kee ee OTAT TECCIDES ES segs ois. e'aoe oars os no Rie, mie ee DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other ODT A TOME Lhe issn sess © -ysreee ints hedepevebeee $700 00 For permanent improvements........ 922 44 HOOT aA OP 25 BT Me ist pepe savour yon cheba ale 147 20 Hor material. ..... tide -eoplon- oe qeeoes 70 33 For advertising, $373.56; attractions, Po Fe AEA Ly ocnis iy 4phe LOE Sees wire 650 56 For interest, $325.75; insurance, $25.42; taxes, $26.20; total... 0G oti. 2% 377 37 For salaries directors, $108; sundries, $25. TOtAl:.. sci Sem ies-|- Ieee meees ehh 133 00 For salaries: Secretary, $100; treas- urer, $100; police, $60; judges, $15; helpers, etc., $90.32; total.......... 365 32 For race purses (horses)..........+.- 1,375 00 For premiums on horses... $153 00 For premiums on cattle... 175 00 For premiums on sheep... 47 00 For premiums on swine.... 26 00 For premiums on poultry.. 133 50 For premiums on farm pro- GUGE.&.. scceh tee aa se 44 70 For premiums on dairy products. ......--seeeees 20 75 For premiums on domestic. 167 25 $5,210 68 $5,724 22 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 297 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... $5 00 For premiums on flowers... 93 00 For premiums on fruits.... 60 00 For premiums on miscella- PO OTING Mit. AS edi. «5 sing 10 00 Mra AN dee 63 55's non ae ane $935 20 PEA ISDUEBEMENUS:....cteores toh e cee ee oe eee ee $5,676 42 PrANEE (OVCOR ES « ots see 12 00 For premiums on domestic. 314 00 For premiums on flowers... 33 50 For premiums on fruits.... 107 00 Total... Ne see eee we ese wees 1,857 50 ONTARIO. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... From gate receiptais. .:./< 5 'a= s»aas aoe $1,269 67 From rent of @roumds....4. 2... 0.50. 102 00 $7,257 43 $1,045 65 $6 00 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. Hrom rent of privileges. 4) (20:4 .... $216 75 Hrom annual members... .') .0....... 151 00 wirom, late members... AN0 028... 6. 10 00 From entries for races (horse)....... 275 00 PROM: NOLES PIVEDK.°. 2rs)4 alaalete snes olais o'ete 907964 From other S0urces ...6 vse soles. 6 80 ROGIACAEC Ti fl sie ca csn ee de ene aeee 1,648 28 Bee nN PA LOd POO. 5 / ale ot TOs ECOL ITS tc nee ee te $3,253 50 163 00 650 07 381 30 350 00 $4,586 19 $6 95 $171 97 13,719 73 $13,891 70 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 301 DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other SAL AATOT Geis AAC Cpa iettan a,» os + shoe 3 $4,879 98 PI UENO aed cacti Utes atane ayokaval sie 's =~ S455 984 34 MA ORIG fore cpsis sas, «nya ihe save als ors dtenn + 273 65 For insurance, $85.29; hay, grain and straw, $187.34; dinner _ tickets, eS COLA Es 2 cla clalne we ciatstats sta = = 447 13 For music, $175; attractions, $375; printing and advertising, $556.57; CECA co, «SOR PRR. 5 og) cis aMabeheraite ossisehar ete 1,106 57 For office disbursements, $110.80; mis- cellaneous, $491.44; total.......... 602 24 For salaries: Secretary, $140; treas- urer, $75; police, $123.50; judges, $71.60; superintendent, $185; help- ers, etc., $86; total...... Vata, ecagaars ous 631 10 For race purses (horses)...........-. 1,480 00 For premiums on horses... $276 00 For premiums on cattle.... 558 00 For premiums on sheep.... 81 00 For premiums on swine.... 23 00 For premiums on poultry.. 940 00 For premiums on farm pro- CES ys aig care thee acelldte ers 286 50 For premiums on dairy PEOCUCESH I Rie 2 ote clatair 11 00 For premiums on domestic. 472 00 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... 167 00 For premiums on flowers .. 138 50 For premiums on fruits.... 278, 25 For premiums on miscel- PATO MIG, cussed atejate sas auen 217 00 Beal erage eocre siereie rih A. Y tee ete 3,448 25 Totaly GIS WUTSEMICTIES | .:.5)0' D2 Sethe. 1s ode deh eEnee $13,800 26 BalaNee, (GLEGIL) cis (eae oc 6 siete view alae o0) 64 9) ders $91 44 302 NIntH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ORLEANS. RECEIPTS. From ‘rent of grounds...,..» 5 0- +s ee sep Prom, rent of privileges: +...) 4 delde aes rom rand Savas stro ols «4h om ewe os From.annual members. ...3%i¢% « pala From life mem bers :3/.:0:./5.da ae ie From entries for races (horse)........ From returned premium............. From rebate tasurance .. 5245.62.22 EOIN PAPLCS IVAN ss iuie sf hc ie et eee EP OME AUC ic.cynne wR leg ae es From interest on mortgage, $49.80; oats and fodder, $41.12; log cabin, BS IDEA eles ssi abate) ofh ts Bo pee ois lattes Receipts for T9003 c!..:c6<% ae owes tt Total receipts’. .\050'. 00. BRO. 5 OH. oe DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of notes or other obliga- For permanent improvements........ Hor dnsprance aiy/i.. ..- BG STs For salaries: Secretary, $75; treas- urer, $75; office assistants, $51.75; police, $73.25; judges, $72.50; super- intendent, $54; helpers, etc., $140; EAPC arts RES EN oe eee ceric. e Por Trace purses-(HOTBER)> . 2.0 fos. oe For premiums on horses... $353 75 For premiums on cattle... 224 00 $939 00 70 00 506 80 133 40 968 00 40 00 447 25 3 00 8 75 900 00 1,873 08 eevee eveee $624 00 980 00 99 16. 434 20 539 98: 541 50) 991 25 $367 42 5,987 20 $6,354 62 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 303 For premiums on sheep.... $454 00 For premiums on swine... 118 00 For premiums on poultry.. 163 50 For premiums on farm pro- ay ox ac oi acai) ia) Siove.s, gem 64 00 For premiums on domestic. 214 55 For premiums on imple- ments and machines.... 4 00 For premiums on flowers.. 56 00 For premiums on fruits... 112 25 For premiums on miscella- He MMA Ess eke. 5s Ss ee TT 50 PGRE DY Opes Sein a ALB ara etl tes Set does ces $1,841 55 Total disbursements... Wi Su ee caer tke ee wee ee Pe $6,051 64 Balance: (credit) ..: 2 inateer.- sagas eee ds wis ae $302 98 OSWEGO. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $592 95 BrGim Pace TECEMDUS «6 che oe «sw welt $4,548 52 Prom. rent of srounds 7.2% W202... 2 55 00 Prom rent Of privileges........:...208% 588 67 From life members.......... ayers: apna 100 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 209 00 1D (1 1 CS a 2,120 85 BOSCO UU LOR LOU ae ee tetas c's ate’ ciclciislate sis s alee hoe: ete 7,617 04 MipsiVECGeUM areas: 6. sR as «os coe tele $8,209 99 DISBURSEMENTS. For permanent improvements........ $1,784 10 1G) ra dete eter ceeee 664 94 304 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For printing, $138.03; advertising, $145; use of tents, $92.50; insurance, LG. LOLA inion osu cide, deo aes miont For interest, $200; music, $110; special attractions, $225; revenue tax, $8.33; water, rent, $6; total...c¢. 8%... 0.4% For judgment and costs account merry- TO-TOURA Law, SUG. a j0.5 sis hs x oe oars ie For salaries: Secretary, $150; treas- urer, $50; office assistants, $39.30; police, $183.88; judges, $135.98; su- perintendent, $140.04; helpers, etc., SEO TAEC), ee en. RRR eA Bor. race purses (HOTses). .. ....5 5555. For premiums on horses... $305 00 For premiums on cattle... 405 00 For premiums on sheep.... 147 00 For premiums on swine.... 234 00 For premiums on poultry.. 153 50 For premiums on farm pro- duce? 20. 's jaseareaeee es ae 180 50 For premiums on dairy Products..es 4% 2 pehs..ce as 18 00 For premiums on domestic. 504 95 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... 20 00 For premiums on flowers... 29 50 For premiums on fruits... 26 25 Ocal he ofa Amati ee $391 53 549 33 301 44 784 45 1,125 00 $8,156 38 $53 61 = oe COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. OTSEGO. RECEIPTS. POEGHY PALE LECCIPUS. cet oo cee cre $2,212 Prom rent Of STOUMMS 2... oa. wees s 20 rum Fent Of Privileges. 2...........s 299 PeOIt ANTAL MeMDEIS. coos ses ces see 473 Prem Mle WHEMDELS). «ccc vieyes cn oes oes 20 From entries for races (horse)........ 207 rai, STAMG, SLANG 4 si gcse 5 jee «ses 221 COME CONALONAG; 8s. 2. 6a csc ec ae 100 From bonds issued, notes given or any DENMEFVODIITALION -..-.5.100.tope/e ate rsrasarcrere:e 1,500 ) ISTP LA Se nea 2,000 BRM AL CCCMUS: «1st we oo ORME ree ae dha ares DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other NUL OMS ays chav wi see's. one Serer aks $206 For permanent improvements........ 1,345 POG NADGE. n MEGA ARS cot neo ans ee ane 226 For material and printing ........... 293 For special ‘attractions. «2... 2.0000 358 For sundries and all other expenses... 1,196 For salaries: Secretary, $75; treas- urer, $50; office assistants, $90.75; police, $141; judges, $57; superin- tendent, $40; helpers, etc., $33; total 486 For race purses (horses)............. eae d022 For race purses (bicycle or other) in- GLUCING COST OL PLIZES soc. oe 66 oe oe ace 75 For premiums on horses... $147 00 For premiums on cattle... 788 00 For premiums on sheep... 275 00 For premiums on swine... 44 00 For premiums on poultry.. 173 75 For premiums on farm pro- duce, GHuey, HIT ies 89 00 98 75 50 00 305 $7,054 30 306 NiIntTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For premiums on dairy Products>. 2! SPH eee 29.25 , For premiums on domestic. 186 00 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... 62 00 For premiums on flowers.. 34 25 For premiums on fruits.... 46 50 For premiums on miscella- MC OMS GPL ay pegs aia oe 164 25 DSU AN Is bade e ahoihe S's as once eee ee $2,039 00 Total disbursements! !41.: 0b o, Ue ob oo eee $7,250 67 Bal AR CA SMCINE) gas ys hs tt sw 5 chante ee eee $196 31 PUTNAM. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $208 26 PTGHE CAL VECEMP ESTEE Wein: hietieeee $1,150 50 Fromrent of2rounds. ...3..).2 Ree 50 00 From. went ofiphiVile ges og yi, sieseieisdecove,-c- 260 00 From jentrieS@; 445.2... .. .i.:.. aaa. 10 00 Prom grandstand: ,.....0.: 29th 20) Oe 408 25 From) score, cards, ...2.....053 CC® -\asna 69 30 From entries for races (horse)........ 630 00 From.reservéd seats... /j20%.55% «03 75 50 Brom, State 07. SCA t.... eucine oe mentee 1,275 90 Receipts tor 1O00.... Sank Sae eee ee wee sek ae eree 3,929 45 Total receipts ii.cn ota anes tees eee eee $4,187 71 DISBURSEMENTS. Foragopaid. Bills, ; .'.( 20a oe sey, $294 00 HOP (BSUrance 55 os. 05: vs fale verdes acces 60 00 For interest On Note. .... 3)sss as te Oe 60 00 For permanent improvements........ 119 79 Por feed, oate and straws... ssase5- 225 75 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 307 POE VAWOR 2.4. Se Rs ccsegs,*,+,. 5,08 ORED $350 00 POU MAerIahy). CYS. .2 Heties 2 222g See 114 29 GE BAVETUSINEY sie, siceueeees © sda. $15,609 40 From rent of carriage sheds.......... 376 00 PEOML PeHE GL PTTVIICTEN «6s. <=) eterna weet 2,768 35 From entries for premiums (poultry).. 169 00 Hrom snual Members... ...... . . vias ae 1,134 00 tome mCINDCES: «ac. s+ oa eas 060 case 275 00 308 NintoH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE From entries for races (horse)........ $3,898 75 From “carriage “tickets. ...%:.1..' Amro. 269 00 From miscellaneous 0.0 e0 e 77 77 From (Statenr nore. i SUB Re h ite eral 3,631 62 Receipts for 1900. cp... wi cant gers Gee hen elem: POA TECCIDIR oy «oir eis a S5it nate 207s) eae ee ee DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds and interest... $3,579 73 Hor Gees GLO Ge «52 co eteheten as 122 50 For printing and stationery.......... 1,010 12 For incidental expenses ............ 4,183 17 ot VaOr aes Sapte njeinic, +/6/'s ie soe 1,058 62 For salaries: Secretary, $600; treas- urer, $750; police, $410; judges, $481.88; superintendent, $75; help- ers, $1,916.75; total. ....06.200.:. . cds 4,183 60 For race purses (horses): b).\....... 7,452 50 For premiums on horses... $150 00 For premiums on cattle... 663 00 For premiums on sheep....* 176 00 For premiums on swine... 249 00 - For premiums on poultry.. 762 00 For premiums on farm pro- GWEC Pris So ss lel le ele oe 507 00 For premiums on domestic. 560 25 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... 245 00 For premiums on flowers. . 845 00 For premiums on fruits.... 415 00 For premiums on miscella- MPOUS: ie Ge preiris crore ote Ee 641 75 OT AL., AMER, 50> > ciphetereriterd mms MOk 5,214 00 Total GsDUnAMMERLA « s.s < .\. 6...) Po. 6 From rent of privileges?........<<%. + From entries for premiums.......... From annual members .............. From entries for races (horse)........ Wrom Gonationp” pyis). 2. ss. feta she te From bonds issued, notes given or any other Obligation... ..< . . Oe. HAGR. =< 208 58 Totalimecelpts (32 R Nr. sai cc aren aes shaw at For hay and straw: .... +. V.eres oe PiGr Mapes s Rhee eos Le hse OMe eee Por MmaAterial ’. 5 spec cans see OOS a 0 ie For general expenses (stationery, post- ace ete) oe. .Gl Gas teeter hide 08 $3,933 78 a eS eS ee COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. PORT AC VErUIsiMe Airepme. oe a a is's a aimee ee 762 00 314 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THR For.race purses (horses)... ....¢.... 41 $3,751 00 For premiums on horses... $229 00 For premiums on cattle.... 923 00 For premiums on sheep... 187 00 For premiums on swine... 59 00 For premiums on poultry.. 541 25 For premiums on farm pro- UIGEY Mi os kictewin Seeaalete oe 95 00 For premiums on dairy PRGO NCGS: foo. neat. Sas 124 00 For premiums on domestic. 401 00 For premiums on imple- ments and machines..... 93 00 For premiums on flowers.. 27 00 For premiums on fruits.... 37 75 For premiums on miscel- 1GMEOUS, PES PAI oac.s,00 28 00 4 RCRT BAGO OE DP MEP WA en en Ua oN tate ln 2,745 00 Total GisburPewieWts ~ «..-..>. 6 ws nn « see ele e $14,536 73 BAlanCe (CLEC) .:.'. Geko ws «oo us oe ee eee $49 54 SARATOGA. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900...... $504 15 Prom Gate receipts. 2°... eee Aes eee $1,883 55 P'rOm, Cran: Stag 6 ea oes css Giatateer od 589 45 From rent of privileges: s:.:.....1..- 2000: 675 50 PIVOT POUUPUHY, tec nia)S |ocet-. Sat. seg ad. ah SCHUYLER. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... irom) Pate TeEceipts.. «i... 4s aslo «2 eels $827 93 rom Tent. Of Sroundse...'.. ... os sks 109 75 Erom.rent.of privileges sen ivi... 5. 2. 87 50 Erom-annual Members... cms ene os 226 00 PREOTD, SPANGISLAM EY: .. 2605)s0at.'s). 3's oSe ah ehe= 62 30 From entries for races (horse)....... 129 37 From advertising—premium list..... 56 00 NSP OMMMMNLCROR Tile. Spero jage\jere, total 065.9... 7e. eee eee 581 03 Por MUtrACTIONS .. .......1 3. + abe mee 365 00 Hor dase balls occ sds etm aioe ie bce 95 70 For salaries: Office assistants, $38; police, $73; judges, $98.21; helpers, BIDS POL OO Lda ledocamis dG /2'sb eee 271 17 From race purses (horses)........... 1,000 00 For premiums on horses... $116 00 For premiums on cattle... 272 00 For premiums on sheep... 124 00 For premiums on swine... 49 00 For premiums on poultry.. 323 25 For premiums on farm pro- UEOE, on in v's avi vinoisloia > AAT 21 25 For premiums on dairy products: +. VF. Mates Rae¢ 17 25 For premiums on domestic. 220 60 $5,347 40 $5,565 57 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 325 For premiums on flowers... $22 00 For premiums on fruits.... 73 80 For premiums on miscella- MCOUSS ono S ed tn aede cess 29 00 reer ty 2 io eo oar ust 3 cui $1,268 15 Poval disbursements . ... ce BPP VII AIIS, 253. 2% $5,698 50 Balance (GGDib hy : 3 sac )o he esos soe oc stems $132 93 TOMPKINS. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $401 85 ROM OMe LO CONUS oo.5 5 e580 a ae. 4 ers ae $1,268 59 ' Brom rent of privileges. .........2... 328 00 rote rTerate SOM... sii. ck ccc kee ve 31 22 Krom annual members. ... 2... 2. ..<6 4 1,386 00 From members, $5 each.............. 200 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 304 50 From signs on fence and advertise- ments and premium list............ 123 00 . From bonds issued, notes given or any GEHEP (ODA LOIS ce 56. ie ig coe sivas 2,200 00 EBV RROTEMs SU ALES schnesensetatewarerayrstiey 84) «aud ie 6;/oluses 2,045 96 OCU EOE MISO OR eB shale ek kd Ca ae ovis ee oe 7,887 27 SRTED IMO QCUIIER, 6. 5.5. cicchsic. «ee, 6 situa HME /sis/4 e's sore aie $8,289 12 DISBURSEMENTS. For permanent improvements........ $989 75 CTEM REE Yo. fae, dale yet nie wn ceetensy avs. a eeided ae 126 99 GE MHALELIAN So io sone char eee 183 96 For tickets and advertising, $944.50; tents, $210; insurance, $84; posters, $8; attractions, $495; repairs, 326 Nintra ANNUAL REPORT OF THE $272.33; National Trotting Associa- tion, $29; starter, $35; electricity, $48; marshal, $10; forage, $106.37; OLS oes 9 pd Same icingh he eee oo Ie $2,241 80 For salaries: Secretary, $50; treasurer, $50; office assistants, $36; police, $29.75; judges, $36; superintendent, PSt-bO hotel 6). uct cmeecieaeeeess 283 25 For race purses (horses)............. 1,956 00 For premiums on horses... $544 50 For premiums on cattle.... 503 75 For premiums on sheep.... 291 00 For premiums on swine.... 223 00 For premiums on poultry .. 95 00 For premiums on farm pro- OB ee eed ic ieks ae ee eae 105 15 For premiums on dairy PPOUMRIS: CR ke Ge ccge & © 6006 48 45 For premiums on domestic. 257 65 For premiums on flowers .. 63 35 For premiums on fruits.... 71 40 For premiums on miscella- MOOG 2 os. oa rashes e's 2 hse 286 35 Potal ss Sree See eek. eee int es 2,489 60 Total disbursement rowers. ss)... ass 20a esau e mae $8,271 35 Balanas{eredit) -.. sss sissk eens ces bes ee Cee eee $17 77 ——— ULSTER. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900........ $225 13 From gate receipts...... ida. >4% $1,760 50 From grand stand..........»\..4ai eq... a} 160 75 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. From rent of privileges.............. $231 75 From entries for premiums and annual MIGTDET Rs 5 Pape hoe beds oan. «, es 180 00 rpm GONATIONS:.2 39.06. BE.2R 6, 52 30 Muon notes siven ... fe Se Pe a 500 00 PR OPEREMPS UA COIN. Log ae e wiciecadehe scc\e.0.0u5, 04s 1,802 69 ECOL G bO REE OOO 2 8.2 eon dave a aete AUB eo diele'e oe aes RGEA RECEDES SAH Nae k vies ate SS sce. dois DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of notes and interest... $1,050 LOTS OLE OS UA A Se ot a re 182 SORE RECT, 6 ee Caw ogee et a ale g sn 6 Rotate 180 For miscellaneous expemses.......... 542 For advertising and printing......... 360 For rent of erounds WP cis ae 6 a ato 200 For salaries: Secretary and assistant, $150; treasurer, $50; office assist- ants, $37; judges, $73.27; superin- BEHOCHG, P20 UME licncwstevete'n «0.42 es 212 6 335 For race purses (horses)............. 259 For purses (coaching parade)......... 162 For premiums on horses... $203 40 For premiums on cattle... 319 50 For premiums on sheep.... 11 70 For premiums on swine... 10 80 For premiums on poultry.. 198 67 For premiums on farm DrOGuee, .....40. AGG. ssi 121 75 For premiums on dairy PPOGHC EARP nes winlewie 19 00 For premiums on domestic. 224 15 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... 82 50 75 93 $4,687 99 $4,913 12 328 Ninta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For premiums on flowers. . $40 90 For premiums on fruits.... 112 00 For premiums on miscel- laneoas .. UGG waa 84 00 DOLAY cca Dre ee es hee eee $1,428 37 Total disbursenients . ccscateticeentee ss teeeoes Peale nce (regal). 2 03% co ve keen sv oe ee eee WARREN COUNTY FAIR. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... Prom patereceipts. ci. eS , $1,641 09 Promverentof. grounds. .2.0.5.0RUas 10 00 Brom rent of privileges wii Lo ol 6. oP. 299 75 From entries for premiums.......... 14 50 From entries for races (horse)........ 333 75 Papin motes givens yy. .i 3.55 see re 5,800 92 PrpomeStatesk mi Teets secant ee se 1,312 63 Receipts for 1900086... . .. pes, -cueis oe dea te} He Potal Precepts: tsi ge tees Sees + ee DISBURSEMENTS. Bor payment of notes....< i 0 4A 2. $825 07 For rental of land and appurtenances. 500 00 For grand stand, judges’ hall, exhibi- fap ghd Se: Cede cat one eee 4,100 00 Mor labor, : cisieae cuss. ae ee 535 28 Wier MALeTIO!. «.. chank'scces Smee eee eS 994 95 For sundry bills, $133.46; insurance, $59.16; music, $100; printing and ad- vertising, $187.73; attractions, $230; PPE erie sik bg nie ac, 6. +, bore ee ee 710 35 $4,701 65 $211 47 9,412 64 $9,427 14 i COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. For salaries: Secretary, $50; office assistants, $16; police, $8; judges, $40; helpers, etc., $154; total ee ee eee Bor race purses (horses)............ 0 For race purses (bicycle or other), i eluding Gost of prizes’. ..........'..- $268 00 765 00 25 00 of ate) a9) (011.8 For premiums on horses... $71 50 For premiums on cattle... 123 50 For premiums on sheep.... 47 00 For premiums on swine.... 33 00 For premiums on poultry.. 79 00 For premiums on farm BEOUUCES 2 eco. sss to one 00 41 50 For premiums on dairy PEOUUCER cas oo 5 0 50S ons 63 50 For premiums on domestic. 154 00 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... 23 00 For premiums on flowers. . 30 25 For premiums on fruits... 14 75 PEO Ge as Fhe, oa eso) «od opepegeieersynachataroges Decay GISUMESETICTRUN co.cc. c esc ese cess one ea HS aN GON (CRERIO Nias anit cea ec eeaetst ses co acaeles WASHINGTON. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900 COM FALE TECCIPUS s. 0st. 2 52 «2. <)siere ie Prom rent.of privileges. ...... . <<... +. Brom, annual: MEMDELS . 2.4 4. abtasueee co >) a ee 351 WAYNE. RECEIPTS. HMrann gate FECCIDUS..... 208 25 ca tae irom rent Of Privileges 02. ..6 26 <2 POMC LES MEMPCTN.'.. .'. cee tee es From entries for races (horse)........ [SYR T TD CSREES a lg SM PN Poral receipipg : .. 1 0So6 oo: Se nes a DISBURSEMENTS. Balance due at close of fiscal year 1901 Har Erber Guviraeks. 22. 602.000 52-6 For hay, straw and tents............ For unpaid premiums of 1900, $250; biblsraf 1900, $75; total,..........- For salaries: Judges, $45; superin- imigewe S50 total... weve took en For race purses (horses)............. Pensa TUSCIMCRT Aid st... 4445.74 -55 +. foe. For premiums on horses... $268 25 For premiums on cattle... 177 00 For premiums on sheep... 185 00 For premiums on swine... 51 00 For premiums on poultry. . 19 00 00 00 10 00 $2,618 08 3a2 Nintuo ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For premiums on farm pro- OL WGe Re ie tic ares eae $66 80 For premiums on domestic. 201 95 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines.... 105 00 For premiums on fruits... 52 45 CAND GES amen oo ae g ee e e $1,126.45 Mo teOINDUESCMONESy cs. Sack Gok. Su alle eee ate WESTCHESTER. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1901....... Promieatewaceipis it. 22.25. .) niga. $7,504 05 From rent Of-erounds........ 22.04.05. 400 00 From rent of privileges............. 976 50 From entries for premiums.......... 175 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 1,055 00 i nemyppent Jor Bialbles totems nc. oer. 98 00 From bonds issued, notes given or any Other OD PALO .0)5 ov ~ sb oe ecu ss 1,000 00 PPEOWMI SO UATE Ae ce Mts oss Sihie ow ke bee 5,500 73 RereipiectorsVOOr- 442. ss veg ees tee LRG GYR AN Ot Ale TAMERS ice brie od ws o SO EG oo» «I DISBURSEMENTS. For interest on mortgage and notes.. $930 00 iso” NAF ies ste otis ot PERE Bisemi xs 959 88 Por materials.25.\, .. AE GEL van wee 1,500 00 OR RG Bee oa. aH) SRE oie eben 220 00 $2,618 08 $903 26 16,709 28 $17,612 54 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. For salaries: Secretary, $500; treas- urer, $100; office assistants, $285; police, $425; judges, $250; superin- tendent, $525; helpers, ete., $375; INTELL =) aa arg arenare-artraeeiic Seen Lt we oe 2,460 00 Hor race purses: (horses): 2.2. 65005602 2,850 00 For premiums on horses... $4,096 00 For premiums on cattle... 371 75 For premiums on sheep... 314 00 For premiums on swine... 82 00 For premiums on poultry. . 570 25 For premiums on farm pro- CUUEERtr re os PP. PRS as 886 00 For premiums on _ dairy BEGOUCIS. «PE .O0$. 0.5503 231 50 For premiums on domestic. 1,188 25 For premiums on flowers. . 186 50 For premiums on fruits... 386 00 BR Oy aa atch fhetperes bs: 5 ois FO Ie 8,312 25 ota) disbursements, ...\....i Qi 8.029) anges hates Balance, (Credit) ): 5.5 aisha. + 44 ge wa ee WYOMING. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... Prom gate receipts... . 1.078 Puede: $589 75 From rent of grounds and house..... 84 50 Prom rent of privileges.....VV 2502 73 00 Prom, annpall (memberss.cOvrey ys 2s. 148 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 325 00 rom serand ‘stand 2... Vi 2. ee. 2 241 57 334 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE From bonds issued, notes given or any otherobligations ........ 2988 Seta OPO TIS Pad C bei esse cede eee ste PE eee Reteinis: LOT ABW iss wisi, 5. 2js.s, 5, <,«. 8h eel Total eecewpis s,s. 5 FS ING «+ u,8.s DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other GODIN ARAOIR eae ve, So SS ore chs stoves For band and attractions. .):),)2+..... For permanent improvements ....... For printing and advertising......... Pir ABO pe ee oka 5% 2 ase u's Pils Ts Bo POP UNATCPTALY 2). ws ci AN IE oe For hay, feed: and stabling.......... For dues to State Association, $10; Western New York Asscciation, $5; National Association, $10; United States Internal Revenue tax, $10; For salaries: Secretary, $75; office as- sistants, $19; judges, $31.86; helpers, ete:, S25:25; total Anes. . Ree te S For race; purses(horses). .- 27a 350.28 Migr ANSHraNCe’s...... .. d\pit pays (sewer & For telegraph, telephone, express and POSURE etd ens te cies Lite. a) 18S opps fejah For premiums on horses... $217 00 For premiums on cattle... 392 98 For premiums on sheep... 332 00 For premiums on swine... 68 00 $1,350 00 1,362 43 100 00 $541 47 220 54 546 44 138 55 184 14 156 40 43 66 35 00 139 75 $4,274 25 $4,299 83 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 335 For premiums on poultry. - $14 25 For premiums on farm pro- UGE IE ase > oth: Lo Re 50 70 For premiums on _ dairy SEROMUCER PES 5. 52 5 3 Sek 39 15 For premiums on domestic. 45 20 For premiums on flowers.. 11 35 For premiums on fruits... 37 25 TRO Le ean ee ee ne ee ET $1,207 88 Metre GAS DUT SEMCTIUS: <<. 5c cc's 'e'o's's seus 6 6 ee fe a oe eee $4,267 52 Ralance (credit) ..<.. (i) 3237. -).0 5 cageheh cys $32 31 YATES. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $51 38 Fromceate meceiptsi:s... 0m R620... $877 55 From rent of grounds... . (001. ..0.. 125 50 Fromirent of priyileges...2 40: i000 5... 46 50 From entries for premiums.......... 20 50 Brome aAnntial MeEMDErs. ... «2.6.0 «ce 347 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 105 00 From bonds issued, notes given or any DeneE Oba uOM: 64.) 220.0625. ole 360 00 De ehitaiy GACY raz 2 ya's) cheb sicieie's « a,« «o's «ok 08 1,504 70 ae CN PAO UU a os ia oi a ac di cs ale cia Syeresauanels ove 3 mo! 4 tft 3,386 75 POERPERCOUPE RI yc hae Des Ka utueel a aie «do yaecnts $3,438 138 DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other Cio li BULOIINS COR) nts eases s 3s ese $728 10 For permanent improvements........ 52 50 AV AAWOE Pls AWE ER 6 a oie ct aha afaletatelet he 104 51 LO Ta (Ts ep ay td Ge) A ae 60 91 336 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT oF THE For feed, $50.84; postage, $15.80; water, $3.92; insurance, $35; tele- graph, $4.18; express, $2.10; United States collector, $8.33; printing, $110.30; attractions, $219.25; State Association, $15; band, $40; sup- plaes:, $5.70" totali..% ...eOR EE ce oes For salaries: Secretary, $50; office as- sistants, $32.50; police, $18; judges, $41.20; superintendent, $15; helpers, etesnpowe: total’. O35. ACM SE Slee For race purses (horses)............. For premiums on horses... $184 00 For premiums on cattle... 141 00 For premiums on sheep... 104 00 For premiums on swine... 40 00 For premiums on poultry. . 78 75 For premiums on farm pro- MuGcers™. 2 U. SAVER Eek 89 50 For premiums on domestic. 12 00 For premiums on flowers. . 223 15 For premiums on fruits... 98 50 For premiums on miscella- ME OES. 55 CNEL). 44 10 EO co ine epi cieste ie = ceo yegt osteo ool ot Total disbursewients's>. <2 s/n ve es ve 2. hs Es Balance (credit)..5%..55525 5teen <% $510 42 160 20 515 00 7°80) 10) e116! 8, 16) oeeree eee ee $3,146 64 $291 49 CUBA FAIR AND RACING ASSOCIATION. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... WTO Pace TECEINE 3h sb. oe es eer ee $531 10 rom Tent or prigileges’.’......5 .%..> > 44 40 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. Mor entries for permiums: ii), i123. 25. $190 From entries for races (horse)........ 270 From donations to repair buildings. . 257 From bonds issued, notes given or any Peer ODM eA LION. %..:2..2t ee eies ee ees 1,860 PUReIMe ELEC. Ce SLO ON ae a hai ccs, ade = 1,290 ; JSST RE G1 BG Ba oR PONG MIOECCEEOUS 3. hier ces «a dieciaetns 2 6 aie os DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other ENRON 23 o)s.5-3.5 5.0 4a deed Re te $1,467 Por labor and yprmitime (ies 4.211.451. : 301 HOT WMALEPIA! 5 os ress os ETE 224 er Fen@OF CTOUNGEE Ha. J. o/c.0. 2,080.0 fe 100 JS COMM 22200 00 SSL Ae oi 100 For amount paid Union Agricultural Bociety and Mostage... . . .....0s.6.i.-/e 24 For salaries: Secretary, $100; office assistants, $24.50; police, $23.25; judges, $71.58; helpers, etc., $20.38; GU Ree re oce crc hia ows e « opr ge 9th OM 239 For race purses (horses)............. 1,010 For premiums on horses... $211 00 For premiums on cattle... 252 00 For premiums on sheep.... 80 00 For premiums on swine... 43 00 For premiums on poultry. . 67 75 For premiums on farm BEOOUCENE: ATARI. eo 6 27 00 For premiums on dairy PrOGUGIshS. SEE M4425 ae 6 00 For premiums on domestic. 200 00 For premiums on_ imple- ments and machines..... 1 00 22 00 337 $4,442 85 $4,464 71 338 NintH Annvuat Report or THE For premiums on flowers. . $3L 50 For premiums on fruits.... 14 00 For premiums on miscel- laneotus: S2seucat, Sao 20 00 Wotal one ee ah. Sas. ae $953 25 Pots disbUPseMmeniA sey... 7 base Bes total 6). osc ooe cee 1,174 For material and furnishings........ 128 For dues, telegrams, postage and mis- CEULANCOUN TT: Seed ask 66s ois oas05 sees 154 For music, $107.05; advertising, POUS 05s LOUAL ONE. 6 Se2 2 52a cee 415 For special attractions.............. 197 For salaries: Secretary, $100; treas- urer, $50; office assistants, $62; po- lice, $20; judges, $58.75; superin- tendent, $50; helpers, ete., $207.53; Ce ONRd MR rea eeidcy em crsii-vdvstns: «12's Bi fe de have 547 For race purses (horses)............. 1,543 6,639 24 $6,820 36 342 NintH ANNUAL RePORT OF THE For premiums on horses... $242 00 For premiums on cattle... 480 00 For premiums on sheep... 265 00 For premiums on swine... 307 25 For premiums on poultry. . 196 50 For premiums on farm pro- GUCEs <5) RRR G io ase 48 25 For premiums on dairy PTOUUCEA: .2 bess .t so ess ‘ 16 50 For premiums on domestic. 213 75 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines.... 20 00 For premiums on flowers. . 39 75 For premiums on fruits... 83 50 For premiums on miscella- PEC ONER se ctepo) aienauebeierse att euata= 83 00 CTO GAM as, oe Suse goers chek ayeuate se als es we $1,995 50 Total dishursemente yf): 6. 52.0305. bR see ee ere Balance (credit) \........ eae ens Pr datos see ene $6,840 32 $19 96 AFTON DRIVING PARK. RECEIPTS. From gate receipts... cdess ser evs 2: $2,080 07 From rent, of grounds. =. 2°U.807 2808: 75 00 From. rent of privileges. ......+-+... 409 04 From entries for premiums.......... 162 8&5 Brom check. POOm 2 44s.) 2 Te. ae 23 50 From. grand stand:).. 2.02066 eee 273 94 Hrom\aescessments (e225. AVES 36 00 Mrom- State. 6s se8 hee See eee 1,468 35 otal PEGCIPIN GS... 2c. is doce eet S ee ee ee $4,523 75 COMMISSIONBR OF AGRICULTURE. 343 DISBURSEMENTS. Balance due at close of fiscal year 1900 $1382 08 For payment of bonds, notes or other obligations and interest........... 1,623 62 AGE EEE A CCIOMR 5 ox. oo nities «os diene ey 314 00 For permanent improvements........ 9h Si, SORTA ONE as cn 3 slau) ch VRS He a inp ahme 168 55 Bor printing and advertising......... 175 49 MANNE fe os oo) so eee ow 6 Sys 2 96 40 For insurance, $30; office rent and water rent, $24; total.............. 54 00 RUMCIQCHEAIS . 3. in. cee cere es ws coe 30 21 For salaries: Secretary, $50; office assistants, $15; police, $17; judges, $37.66; helpers, etc., $26; total..... 145 66 Por race purses (horses)... .......<* 4: 441 25 For premiums on horses... $285 50 For premiums on cattle.... 508 00 For premiums on sheep.... 138 00 For premiums on swine.... 68 50 For premiums on poultry. . 96 00 For premiums on farm MEOQUCE Hone Gee eS wa... ot 56 50 For premiums on dairy MEOOUCIS.. fF oe ss. oe: 38 70 For premiums on domestic. 378 20 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines..... 41 75 For premiums on flowers. . 68 80 For premiums on fruits.... 35 00 For premiums on miscel- PAMICGOUS) <5 Hate Syaitie os se 17 25 Aor teeallet. Grae tad 6, « tarsi 2-51 yah ar dove shane gaara 1,732 20 Poth dishursements ....t).5ib...... 20 Bae $5,005 33 344 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE RIVERSIDE. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... Pron gate Tete1ptss ) fe fa Sees oe $1,265 25 Pron orand Stan, oene esos eee 246 20 Prom rent Or Privilesene thie. hd ke ic 454 91 Krom entries for premiums. <. 222.4% 10 75 From entries for races (horse)....... 127 50 Hronmhay awd: SUPA Wass ek oe ale 18 45 From advertising in premium list.... 2 45 BOM tates Se. oo. 2 ALN Bsns 8. 1,571 29 Receipts tor 1901. 2... SIN. Bee Rae ome ee at Total TeCAUIAP 2s. so ods hacks k o EE Deas erie DISBURSEMENTS. For dues State Association.......... $10 10 For expenses delegates State commis- SIGH AMM MER: 5 35,0 12ers Bites Oe oe 32 27 For flowers for funeral of superin- BEHUENE. bt nc Gk cs nieea ob hme eee 13 00 For permanent improvements........ 190 34 For printing premium list........... 80 00 For United States revenue tax....... 8 43 POT LADO. -2)5, «'s «see EN GRATE EBS 381 62 Hor material: . 2% ic.k ose + qegeeeeee we 314 83 BOE DENNY 5 ois cok a 2k dele ae eae ne 50 00 For special attractions. . $4. #2... o. 4. 265 00 For salaries: Secretary, $50; office assistants, $65; police, $131.75; jadges, $91.50; total... 6 wo 338 25 Hor race purses (horses). 3. 4. a: 2265 6 660 00 For premiums on horses... $262 00 For premiums on cattle... 415 00 For premiums on sheep.... 71 00 For premiums on swine... 31 00 $1580 51 3,776 80 $5,357 31 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. For premiums on poultry.. $121 20 For premiums on farm Produce .. .99.0s0. o.com 50 75 For premiums on dairy PCOGMets,... WUE. oso oe 160 11 For premiums on domestic. 331 35 For premiums on, imple- ments and machines..... 19 25 For premiums on flowers.. 30 85 For premiums on miscel- Peneouses:. OSG seas 41 80 OD 5a se cs, ch Fe sia a 5 pet Seo, of RIS $1,534 31 Total drsbursements... . ANGORIS. 2239. arg 4) ralanoes (Gredit)! oo. 5 oso c.se:0a crnave A SRO 345 $3,878 15 $1,479 16 COLUMBIA AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL ASSOCIATION. RECEIPTS. Brom gate receipts... ..12 60 oo os. $2,889 00 Hrom-rent of grounds:.. 72.3100 if. 34 00 From rent of privileges.............. | 637 75 From entries for premiums.......... 235 73 From entries for races (horse)........ ' 442 00 PPE OUIRTG WR AEGO RHE eta Sie eae 3. 's's ele le 80 00 From bonds issued, notes given or any Giter Guligation’ : 6... 25.543 eA 252 38 ROE MRE TR ECIECIII as. 5 .1a0) «RIE. csc S'S 1,450 97 346 Ninrs ANNUAL Report or THE DISBURSEMENTS. Balance due at close of fiscal year 1900 For payment of notes... .gP.g.. 220. POP ARTCrOSE UEVE) son's as eps eae oo reel For advertising and printing......... Por abhor *: V4 Sees << 38. SER o sos Hor material’ ..20. PATI ave wean For imeurance>. 00,9. GRO li. as For miscellaneous expenses ......... For music, $220; special attractions, PoU0> total ok ces nes se ee OB Lbs ts For salaries: Secretary, $100; treas- urer, $25; office assistants, $78.50; police, $168; judges, $17.50; superin- tendent, $35; helpers, etc., $196.50; DEA eieerertioes & 51s! We ie los: do's’ Vala chs ee ate For premiums on horses... $222 00 For premiums on cattle... 131 00 For premiums on sheep... 214 00 For premiums on swine.... 109 25 For premiums on poultry. . 145 75 For premiums on farm pro- UGE Yor Gretna ae hearers 78 00 For premiums on domestic. 87 50 For premiums on flowers. . 158 00 For premiums on fruits... 318 00 For premiums on miscel- lanéeoue:;.. 83.0085: 2 -+ 2 00 pial). AAS AOws ss oe eee pees et $252 38 324 36 190 00 402 50 620 50 1,487 75 $6,936 16 $914 33 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 347 CATSKILL MOUNTAIN. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $9 60 Prem Pave TECEIPLS «1... cis desvenwcnes $959 80 Mronmirent Of sTounds s\n eet 50 00 Fromirent of privileges ...977. 002 226. 349 50 From entries for premiums.......... 163 OL WREORANSERUC IS. Sos ke ae a eae ee dle ele oe 1,007 27 RM ILO 2 55, 5: o.5 ce cay sie aim «iaiwara ied jaies ayes s 2,529 58 Total receipts......... A han kta AY bp lie $2,539 18 DISBURSEMENTS. Kor paymentiof notes.): vi... . 2 to. as $50 00 For purchase GR ein. (068. ose 120 00 PML EMO Attys elShes sins ace wie a aw ohare 152 97 Mortmaterialts 22.2... 0.5. RTALEOSS. 61 35 For printing and advertising......... 184 99 Ge eaeRes Paty ee Oe Se nee lesen ee 28 45 For attractions and amusements .... 508 45 For salaries: Secretary, $50; treas- urer, $50; police, $26.25; judges, $46; ‘superintendent, $50; helpers, etc., Pats CObAl SOUR he's oe er ep eee ne 249 65 For race purses (horses).............- 97 00 For premiums on horses... $58 00 For premiums on cattle.... 249 00 For premiums on sheep.... 26 00 For premiums on swine.... 3 00 For premiums on poultry.. 140 87 For premiums on farm pro- : Cis CO neu oe 3 95 84 For premiums on dairy products: 2:7 .V... gadget 17 50 For premiums on domestic.. 103 77 348 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For premiums on imple- ments and machines..... $6 00 For premiums on flowers... 25 37 For premiums on fruits.... 56 27 For premiums on miscel- lanieOUS- 2 22 A Gps 86s S22 128 07 OCIS Share? stare hee es le $909 69 Potal disbursement sess | eS oh 8 bs eee oles we $2,357 55 Ralanee. (Credit)! !. 727s oe ee eae ty ey $181 63 DELAWARE VALLEY. RECEIPTS. From gate rec€ipts. ..... 05666656000! $1,770 48 From rent of grounds............... 11 00 From rent of privileges. .......0..... 547 00 From entries for premiums......... 251 75 From annual members .............. 430 00 From bonds issued, notes given or any other oObigatiOm' ts... 2. as sssiacess 1,400 00 From State .W009S. 0 5... ba 50 8 ureters 2,155 28 Total. receipts. . sa... d- ObG.. -. .... olther nee $6,565 51 DISBURSEMENTS. Balance due at close of fiscal year 1900 $3,200 00 For payment of bonds, notes or other SblTPPHOHE HHS oD BOL SES 3,023 85 For permanent improvements........ 450 00 For Tabor. RAG soe Oe PL. 5 45 50 00 For George W. Payne, deputy collector 33 36 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 349 For salaries: President, $50; secre- tary, $100; treasurer, $50; office as- sistants, $80; police, $40; judges, $95; superintendent, $63; helpers, See mechs COMA kos wk tne alos 4 ws oo 8 $533 00 For premiums on horses... $485 50 For premiums on cattle... 569 24 For premiums on sheep... 169 50 For premiums on swine... 115 00 For premiums on poultry.. 181 18 For premiums on farm pro- Er 387 11 For premiums on dairy POCUGEB. LVL CU). os ete 39 00 ' For premiums on domestic. 585 30 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines.... 10 50 For premiums on flowers. . 51 10 For premiums on fruits... 78 68 For premiums on miscella- neous. ......-- STs 3 19 Wotdhe: c.g2205.... . ~s8t ATIUIO. 30 2,675 30 Total disbursements, ... MG LANG. «2 tco BOPIOU, Oe $9,965 51 Bialange (GeDit), << .0, ne. Gi. 22.9 e GOES, OB $3,400 00 SHAVERTOWN. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1901....... $42 29 Fromgate receipts... . esr uor. 2 scieis $798 18 | From rent of privileges... ........./. 189 50 350 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE From entries for premiums.......... From annual members .............. From entries for races (horse)....... From entries for races (bicycle or $127 Receipts! for 1901. 2.6.10 Mh BDL es dhe STA Total receipts * ...... Ad. LBLs 5. . 0 HASLOG. 80.2 For rent of grounds............... 3% For music and attractions........... For United States revenue tax....... Mor material eae 8 ce . S.cee td edie Os ae For ‘printing 2... 320202039 Rss ok For office expenses... ... {h[sctZs.s%s).,. For books and tickets... 2: &7....... For salaries: Police, $14.50; judges, $12.50; helpers, ete., $15.35; total.. For race purses (horses). . . 0.2... For race purses (bicycle or other), in- cluding cost.of prizes... ........+. For premiums on horses... $113 50 For premiums on cattle... 187 50 For premiums on sheep... 39 63 For premiums on swine... 20 25 For premiums on poultry. . 86 00 For premiums on farm pro- duves sine Beolote nt. B38 68 64 For premiums on dairy PDO UOHENG. Cy oe cede 15 00 For premiums on domestic. 52 85 For premiums on flowers. . 24 45 For premiums on fruits... 31 54 $1,218 74 $1,261 03 CoMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 351 For premiums on miscella- ME RIRG =? si ais) dik ale» Gone, eS 625 16 Mlamee (Ce bn) the fish. ote Re Mn a ss. 4 aca eele 23 SS,le 60 (ele. ep ale, 0.8 6 8) 's)\ ie 0 \e (ene lef ef okie eneinl es 354 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOONVILLE FAIR ASSOCIATION. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $54 57 Prony Ae Pe CHIEN tr 2 win «dsb 2b Wha he $3,037 TO From rent of buildings for storage... 5 09 From rent Of privue gente n . 6. ese ae 492 18 I‘rom advertisements in premium list.. 92 50 From entries for races (horse)........ 250 00 ESO SCALE acievas om wis ei Waves eee eI Gh. PVCCOIUIUG, FOP LOOM ois. cis Gye ae Ses ots Mee ele te eee ot 5,039 18 Total receipts... .|. [A REP: tae cexagbt one $5,093 75 DISBURSEMENTS. For purchaser Gent... 0649 042000 es $50 00 Pararene 2. ceria: oo og ree ng 2 Oe 325 00 For labor. 1426s sek so OP oe 28 92 For materialandilabor..%.2¢2....4. 124 37 For music, $326.10; advertising, $405.19; messages, $8.60; attractions, $729.20; carriages, $11.25; cartage, $28.50; miscellaneous, $168.19; total. 1,677 03 For salaries: President, $50; secre- tary, $75; treasurer, $25; office as- sistants, $54; police, $104.25; judges, $33.90; superintendent, $12; total... 354 15 Por race: purses (horses) .¥5. Fi. ca. 900 00 For race purses (bicycles or other ee) in- cluding cost of prizes.......605.... 25 00 For premiums on horses... $76 00 For premiums on cattle... 376 00 For premiums on sheep..... 22 00 Yor premiums on swine.... 51 00 For premiums on poultry.. 80 75 For premiums on farm pro- CUEASES sn nes ts eter atta tan evista © 22 50 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 355 For premiums on dairy SCIECOUD AT GLE A eee er $15 00 For premiums on domestic. 349 00 For premiums on flowers... 43 75 For premiums on fruits.... 13 00 For premiums on _ miscel- LS DS ee a 73 75 BrcHea PEN tes. 6 ss 5s 350 3c wae a oe $1,102 75 erred sbUESeMeNts) s,s). oe auycerscnsnes ctbeee $4,587 22 EeePC (CTCCIL) ssn ice ocak fieus: SyecS ear eaeue tae ie $506 53 ——— PHOENIX UNION. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $519 21 SB OMT CALS TERCTPUESE 65 oe, 6.0, e000; 0) a0; 008, $1,436 50 rom rent Of privileges<: - ...... <6 00s ; 243 50 Pitermoreaid SLANG. Fi. ise ee ees 168 70 From entries for races (horse)........ 3 75 From advertising in catalogue....... 55 00 eNO ALIOUG 6052 «cee ss cee e eres 163 00 eS De eyes. x5 as os a chen eas 890 08 eceiprArOr PhO), 250.00. S < wrrega ep gets ces eos oes 2,960 53 LAS ENIUATRSTCCEST Oh OR ek i ct, Maa hires 4 ca ape Ar $3,479 T4 DISBURSEMENTS. For permanent improvements........ $899 55 For advertising, insurance, special at- tractions, music, rent, hay, etc..... 986 91 For salaries: Secretary, $50; treas- urer, $15; office assistants, $10; "police, $32.50; judges, $22; superin- tendent, $60.75; helpers, etc., $35.48; 356 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For race purses (horses)............) $441 05 For premiums on horses... $174 50 For premiums on cattle... 165 50 For premiums on sheep... dL 00 For premiums on swine... 50 50 For premiums on poultry. . 49 00 For premiums on _ farm DrOWUUCE, wens ese choos cise, Sloe 70 45 For premiums on dairy PILOUUGCUS cus alesis is tose 2 6 4 00 For premiums on domestic. 129 75 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines.... 15 00 For premiums on flowers. . 42 75 For premiums on fruits... 61 25 For premiums on miscel- TTC OUS) aa ony cee bees ns 27 00 Total PAC GRPLEe on hatha boaters 820 70 Portal, disbursemenien.” : 4 auc otjytpars Sue ee $3,373 94 Balance tereath))..<.0agt- 5 coe ee «eee ee ee $105 80 GORHAM. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $302 61 Br OMIaAte TECEIPUS eS oi needed eer: $465 70 Bromrent ofprivileses iF. 0.00... 49 00 From entries for premiums.......... 1 85 From annual members............... 166 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 49 40 FPO HAVER LIGIER 6. on. ya wasted el 109 00 STATO 672s PWR faces Me ow tits Ube 1,015 18 Receipts. for; 190125 2... ARR ee ee eas 1,856 18 Mopal Peneipts ss: sd Les'4e Sa ee ee $2,158 74 CAMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. aot DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other PDP AEIONS 210). 4 RA For permanent improvements........ MME ORE NI ORR I! Sgn veh OPE IMECeD IAN WO). LS SG ae ea ees For salaries: Secretary, $20; treas- urer, $20; office assistants, $32.50; police, $17; judges, $20; total...... For race purses (horses)...........-- For race purses (bicycle or other), in- elaine COSt Of PTIZeS.o05..2.- <6. For premiums on horses... $253 00 For premiums on cattle... 54 50 For premiums on sheep.... 105 00 For premiums on swine... 28 00 For premiums on poultry. . 49 50 For premiums on farm Mimics eee. a 24 60 For premiums on dairy RIE@UUCTS . 2-26 sss 3th po a U5 For premiums on domestic. 60 70 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines.... 3 00 For premiums on flowers. . 34 50 For premiums on fruits.... 61 75 For premiums on miscel- ELEC Pee ee erat 61 60 POGANE ROR ek ee Yee eee Ae 1 WB $1,755 96 Se Yh $402 7 358 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NAPLES UNION. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $1,229 66 EROM Bate TECCIP ERs Aid ee ow sea were $890 45 Brom rent -Ofoprivilages . «3 2.oe% 4. 99 80 From annual members... 2&0! 00%... 170 00 rom oats: sold: ..2.5. (Gnhe 2Ble 41 00 From advertising in premium list.... 69 50 OOM SSG ACC Oh eke aces annie wien icone aids 1,108 57 EVCCCIP US LO MUO Ope otc .ts ea ple estate eat ae een 2,379 32 Dobalimeceipes Lowe he. PYSMs a soe eee eee $3,608 98 DISBURSEMENTS For rent of grounds... ... agi @e. oe. ai $135 00 Nor aGUractions. 32)... 52..6Aeeaten totes 75 00 Norilabor's¢sek7 so8 522 sne shod eo 215 32 EOrMaberialy a dic ek Wee oe ee oe 353 53 For printing, $182.60; base ball, $105; dues State Association, $5; board, $52.50; license, $8.45; band $50; total 353 55 For salaries: Secretary, $40; police, $18.50; marshal, $5; total.......... 63 50 For race purses (horses).:........... 433 49 For race purses (bicycle or other) in- cluding COSt Of DFIZES. .... 0.40. se oaks 60 00 For premiums on horses... $144 00 For premiums on cattle... 71 00 For premiums on sheep... 129 50 For premiums on swine... 14 00 For premiums on poultry.. 89 75 For premiums on farm pro- UE rt, Sa ettessty Beale ek eet 145 75 For premiums on dairy DEOUUECLN hanes We soetie el 5 00 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. For premiums on domestic. $154 50 For premiums on imple- ments and machines..... 33 75 For premiums on flowers... 388 50 For premiums on fruits... 120 50 For premiums on miscel- Pome Oni Ne AM). 24 75 LS y can eek ats All ade) ec laa tan ae el 8 $971 00 SOE OMS DUTSEMIETIES 5. eres te te totals fate tate hoe "Ste late te Oe Ballamees(CECGIL) .. sss apes aos those esa oe $2,660 39 $948 59 SANDY CREEK, RICHLAND, ORWELL AND BOYLSTON. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... BEOMSahe TECEIPES. |... oi. ce aces mp $793 80 Promorent,of rounds ..... ei. gees. ss 41 00 Krom rent of privileges. ............. 665 50 Promyannual members.............. 1,997 00 BrGmelise MeMDErS. . ..< je fen ve ass 10 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 446 50 EG CVandestang os. 4 os Poe Kay 2d weds 425 00 GM A VRSOUL co aheim:s « o:ccaptetonianis,. Se 5 00 ECORI Ue rhs ssi. cvs. EE Be :d wcsas 1,851 48 PPPECOMES EOI OURS. . ci de a's «co oc aes > «ee PEG BAL ECC CHEM A Bthlere. oliver 0 sjacspadelome + 0. e DISBURSEMENTS. For permanent improvements........ $626 39 Bore labor ic) =. Ne UE CLSOe rire Coes Pie 65 00 ESR PAC ETA p56 o's ade ewie,y 4, = «ss Gow Oh 226 95 $1,547 64 6,235 28 $7,782 92 360 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For music and attractions........... For insurance and rent of grounds... For salaries: President, $25; secre- tary, $75; treasurer, $8; office assist- ants, $102; police, $114.50; judges, $133.31; superintendent, $197.25; helperavetc.,;903 total <0) A. - skin. For race purses (horses)............. For 8 per cent. race premiums in treas- MEIGS MNANTS*.. 5. 20's pass eceawae oe Mor-wisCCWVanGows » ws. 6 swe eee ee 2 For premiums on horses... $258 00 For premiums on cattle... 554 00 For premiums on sheep.... 118 50 For premiums on swine... 277 00 For premiums on poultry.. 320 25 For premiums on farm PEOGUCE: ooh oho eres 15 25 For premiums on dairy PROGHMEES US is wee. ae 21 00 For premiums on domestic. 368 00 For premiums on imple- ments and machines..... 113 00 For premiums on flowers. . 57 00 For premiums on fruits... 32 75 For premiums on miscel- LANeOURG. UST AG... 39 25 EGUAIRE INS PO ESAS. merusac apices $997 00 77 00 661 06 804 00 348 00 92 14 $6,495 76 $1,287 16 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. MORRIS FAIR ASSOCIATION. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900..... Meno ate FECEIPUS . Se oe ea ele ee $2,920 Pe erand Stand... ee eee 308 Beom rent Of privileges... 7... 2)... - 437 From pasturage and hay............ 73 From entries for races (horse)........ 148 URARRINUESU ALC) 5 5. -'s 5 = 2 «ec eieielataveteccis seis = 2,160 Reece fOr TOOL eles ole c's ce to sisieainye sale mie MPAMIEGEEEIUUS. ~ . c.c cen oe ose saerle ces Nore eaele DISBURSEMENTS. MN A Peco EIS Sos. Sasa caw: oe bee $18 TRCN TRETTSc ceeeee a 248 MO TPaUENACHIONS). 826 oi 26... 2. ed. ame 300 For permanent improvements........ 618 Or ervidends ..22 .. Lice. TLR. 353 ERIM UGE os ce 2h 2. o xie IL aIn be iw ok p> Seger S 321 os MPRA Seis 2.8) 4-3e 6 os oe cama dod LV GTED ) TUS or 01s SU I CR ce 162 For salaries: Secretary, $50; treas- urer, $50; office assistants, $88; police, $46.04; judges, $82.54; super- intendent, $223; helpers, etc., $64.50; ee RIN Ss fa ia: cm 9 o. 5 n, ole oe Mei 603 Hor race purses (horses) . «30 %!+ -2.::i09- 489 OTe ATE SO oo ok ohn, ecchosege, penne ¢ 50 For premiums on horses... $267 00 For premiums on cattle... 814 00 For premiums on sheep.... 189 00 For premiums on swine... 195 00 For premiums on poultry.. 152 35 88 00 361 $2,804 33 6,047 40 $8,851 73 362 Ninta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For premiums on farm produceiiics wat kAeVe $460 90 For premiums on dairy paomueia .ikeek lee eRe 2 57 30 For premiums on domestic. 614 15 For premiums on _ imple- ments and machines.... 67 00 For premiums on flowers. . 145 10 For premiums on fruits... 30 10 For premiums on miscel- PANOOUS NTE o.oo ke 118 55 BESO IUL Siete ove ysis ce bas. o)-> anise RENN ke $3,110 45 ONEONTA UNION. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... Brom eae TeCeIPUse se leis \cte sts sles $4,015 85 Prom rent “or erqunds: 2.0 o eee 207 64 From rent of privilegves:; 092 2. .0 528 « 701 00 From entries for premiums: 7... 7": 992 39 From premium from New York State Hair Commission 4)... Seen tee te 100 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 615 00 From advertising in premium lists and supplement.........0... laretcnavers 498 00 Perom Stave 35 sow sok k a's .s Me Asa ocr 3,531 05 $6,609 01 $2,242 72 $1,176 81 10,660 93 $11,837 74 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. DISBURSEMENTS. Kor purchase of land £905 (i a80% For permanent improvements........ PMD IRON sss o's = sm igehs Bes nia «forint BCMA GOTTA Sz 5 acs He ede 'slend ose 8 snes For miscellaneous accounts.......... PTONVCE LISI, sic 6 esse ewe m s esies Peta AMG SLAIN... oc eee meee oe For salaries: Secretary, $100; treas- urer, $25; office assistants, $32.25; police, $90.75; judges $51; superin- tendent, $55; helpers, etc., $44.25; Mor race purses (horses).:........... TEMES TCC Scie. csc. 2 aces 5 as Stee Bee For premiums on horses... $320 50 For premiums on cattle... 1,142 38 For premiums on sheep.... 219 89 For premiums on swine... 21 00 For premiums on poultry.. 360 75 For premiums on farm PIPORUCELE: iahi SOT RG isi6505 6 270 %5 For premiums on dairy TU STOUR cee een 58 50 For premiums on domestic. 753 97 For premiums on flowers. . 891 13 For premiums on fruits... 179 25 For premiums on miscel- MAMNOUUIS, vs seis hg ooo bles of 126 O1 J TN ge (pA SN aaa WS) iia a 398 1,490 25 00 67 70 16 62 57 33 25 00 00 363 $10,416 43 $1,421 31 364 NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE RICHFIELD SPRINGS. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900 BTOM.PALE LECEMPES ce oc kine oie ws sna eee PLO Tent Of UM GM.. a2ek eek oasis Brom Trent, Of privileges. os... cas ess INCOM ANLEPES Uy oe tates, ee ats ae aee Mee each From entries for races (horse)........ OTE CADE’ Bese hnciowe iene lear te Aas f Recelpis forsee ROR. 2) 57) Le sete ek eee ee $1,088 o. AT HANME PC CNIBSE Fe. 25.5 ccs cegvtret epoen eiadie » Oe oe ees -DISBURSEMENTS. For permanent improvements........ Bor dapor stil te oe ee ees ee LUC e gees 8 arms Paranhos io Fou Ph FOr merchandise. s.ctske homers ee eee POP sprinting. 5. Sg shea. Oe ee DPoenatiractions 2b ieee oer se5 5 For salaries: Secretary, $40; treas- urer, $25; office assistants, $38; police, $45; judges, $28.15; total.... For race purses (horses)............: For balance of premium of 1900...... For premiums on horses... $1438 00 For premiums on cattle... 174 00 For premiums on sheep.... 65 00 For premiums on swine.... 44 00 For premiums on poultry.. 44 50 For premiums on _ farm OURMIMNGE: a sw dahais pct Suto ote e 44 00 For premiums on _ dairy RLS ee Sy aie Sirens 31 70 20) $886 58 2,809 99 $3,696 57 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 365 For premiums on domestic. $172 85 For premiums on flowers. . 21 00 For premiums on fruits... 27 00 For premiums on miscel- L710 111 75 MOG oes sc. cd 3. IR RE ee $878 80 PPR DUNS TIONLS: 2. ios « bd he Mee 1S Dearest ace $3,211 87 vances (credit); ... aeeeeeeeeee wes 5... 088 $484 70 SCHENEVUS VALLEY. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $28 51 BEOMEALE TECEIPUS ... . oo 650+ ss ee $5735 75 EO EANG SLANG... oi 05 eee supe ce salle 50 60 Brom rent of privileges. ...........%- 167 00 From entries for premiums.......... 3 00 rom annual members............-.. 117 00 From entries for races (horse)....... Tl 50 For bonds issued, notes given or any Oi Wer OO MMNINON 2... see $16 52 368 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE GOUVERNEUR AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900 SOCIETY. RECEIPTS. From gate reGeipise 2.38.40). fees $3,55£ 35 From ‘rent of erounds7. 50s L084. dss 95 00 Front rent Of Privileges... oo. cere a sets 566 50 From entries for premiums.......... 154 50 Prom: Wife MemiDers tees v5 0 3. teen 2 170 00 From entries for races (horse)........ PATS 50 Prom donations. 40s Aan. tomes 4 00 Prom SCAG Le Sees. i. 1,338 05 FEGCOLDES TOP TOOT ee aos nig cece ss 0S anal she eiape oteseatosans PO ra FECEIPUS Ts Sak Ak ee uw Ore Sie aoe oe wats Re DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other obligations, principal, $800; interest, PLOZ ASS boda. if icy. « OO ORE. . 2 $992 43 Mor da bOns) iysse cso She eenet .c2si-0c%. 2,079 00 For premiums on horses. . For premiums on cattle... For premiums on sheep.... For premiums on swine... $193 00 244 00 30 00 67 00 7,001 90 $7,069 02 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. For premiums on poultry.. $37 50 For premiums on farm PROWUEe? .o2% O50. SE 52 25 For premiums on dairy muomuctss 2G TES. ous 69 63 For premiums on domestic. » 200 75 For premiums on flowers. . 20 25 For premiums on fruits... 19 25 For premiums on miscel- PATCHED Foe ro cae Sale 4 aoe aire A 44 50 DUEL RG RS PD a eps gd it $978 13 PEAS OUESEMENTS «ss 1 die czas ce eee eicioaiene vi memCe(CPCOIE)... : agence ene ene ee OSWEGATCHIE. RECEIPTS. iHromesate receipts: ......7 270 ee $3,346 60 From rent of privileges... ........... 452 00 From entries for premiums.......... 261 56 From entries for races (horse)....... 434 06 Wren Onaons (1 oceo6 Saceas BSS 165 00 OMSL Lewd cet... « Sauthes, «. MASA LOG at Ser EeE TEER... Sade o bis4s + cdl, +. 3 oO DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other Obi AtIODS 2.) 2) QUGL cpes Lagat. t6 $47 37 TUTE EOC On ee Gc © ee a ree ef 233 70 HOP Ail AChORSES «ie «iiier oss 6 She oy 1,300 00 369 $6,642 12 $426 90 370 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For salaries: Secretary, $100; treas- urer, $25; office assistants, $37; police, $3807.75; judges, $108.94; superintendent, $50; helpers, etc., $1,445.50, COUAL.. oa. tae aed te ee For race purses (horses) .¢%).00i. 00... For premiums on horses... $304 00 For premiums on cattle... 741 00 For premiums on sheep... 158 00 For premiums on swine... 47 00 For premiums on poultry... 78 50 For premiums on farm POUNCE ic: .62s cha scte oo 80 00 For premiums on dairy PROGUCES G5 5 cio de ptee site nays 100 00 For premiums on domestic. 193 75 For premiums on imple- ments and machines..... 42 00 For premiums on flowers.. 11 50 For premiums on fruits... 16 50 For premiums on miscel- LATGOGS 36%) soc plates ord 99 00 DOtAD Se HELIS ELS Re. Biles $2,072 57 2,936 55 1,871 25 aon 1k $7,761 44 ae $1,994 65 RAQUETTE VALLEY AND ST. REGIS VALLEY AGRICUL- TURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY. | RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $74 49 From gate receipts. 0... ic eeeee te 2 ds $1,621 67 From rent of grounds............... 45 00 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. Prom.rent of privilegesiwe.. 52. .k claw $484 50 From entries for premiums.......... 316 00 From entries for premiums collected RPPREU MUU eas 2 o-< vix's.s oe ME As A acetate 35 50 From annual. members. .t..Ws).. «+ «. 177 00 Prom, life: members... .<. .222% «cides 10 00 From entries for races (horse)........ 1,115 50 From bonds issued, notes given or any Giher Oblealion ... ssc Eas Shs 2,500 00 POMS LATE 3 9083 sno 'sinstptaaten 2. abs 2,359 17 Peoun miscellaneous. . « «ae MUel ¢.. 3... 193 99 Pere POLL OOS OF 5. «ga. satta dss eas csaeieiee ois MEINE CEIDUS S515)... Corea be, o OE DISBURSEMENTS. Balance due at close of fiscal year 1900 $170 41 For payment of bonds, notes or other SDA UOMIG Ys a3 -/ 2a s. siete cae fee ee 712 00 For permanent improvements........ 397 24 Brom mor Hey AO Fate. lets. « aatemneathe 260 61 orp teriaWh), Ged... 5 senders ce oe eke 15 08 Be OUTS CHMIOR ES Ma ws) 5 5 en oc es Sere eae 930 00 For printing and advertising......... 464 60 MormiscellaneGusel. sci... eee ee 315 98 For salaries: Secretary, $100; treas- urer, $100; office assistants, $156.50; police, $150.47; judges, $47.35; superintendent, $75; helpers, ete., SOA tObdl. . .. 5s, s »- IG Te 696 82 For race purses (horses)............. 2,050 00 For premiums on horses... $419 00 For premiums on cattle... 1,218 00 For premiums on sheep.... 161 00 For premiums on swine... 84 00 For premiums on poultry. . 205 00 371 $8,858 33 $8,932 82 Sta NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For premiums on farm PrOMUCE LA eg eee $78 50 For premiums on _ dairy PYORUCES (MY We. ets 4 aH 121 50 For premiums on domestic. 198 95 For premiums on imple- ments and machines..... 42 75 For premiums on flowers.. 42 25 For premiums on fruits... 19 50 For premiums on miscel- LaMeOUS AU AAR OG 169 25 WOVA cK AKER eee ae wo TOA Ae ne $5,759 70 sPOtal Gis DUPSEMIENES 0 ewes ee ete o AI Balance. (credit)......2TaR Meer eeIe .....20'55- COBLESKILL. RECEIPTS. | Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... Prom gate neceipis. . a iecs vee. bees $3,199 20 FKromvrent ofjereunds........5.5.. 8b 183 00 From rent ofiprivileges. ....030300.2% 862 50 From entries for premiums.......... 429 80 Rrompannpabimembers: .. 20 -os00eeiu 1,554 00 From miscellaneous. ... ..ag0x3.. ;Q012. 30 49 From entries for races (horse)........ 150 00 From suspensions... .....:08, 788: 2 aor 21 00 From advertising, etc... od ..eweglss 136 50 From notes given or any other obliga- 74 Rn © 2-3 As, a A 1,500 00 TOM SLALO. toc cies 6.0 e as ON Re ee 3,120 68 Hrom insurance. .:...... OG:2PRL 2 eS. 2,163 55 Beceiprs LO DOOM i tii ote cale iee Sie ace ee Total receipts... OU CUR. oe Le ae $8,772 44 $160 38 eS 13,350 72 $13,423 58 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. DISBURSEMENTS. For permanent improvements........ $4,505 24 PM EOT eS Sk. He oT A407 32 SDPPMISUTANGE OL. «ac ites 6 eee sara 159 36 ieerimverest. WY) 20... oe eee eae mks 169 20 For printing, postage and _ miscel- IABEOUSTEXPONSES «2... rete s ss vite 844 37 For salaries: Secretary, $100; treas- urer, $50; office assistants, $494.60; judges, $224.72; superintendent, $75; NAICS Fae ea PRRs Sheer rica 944 32 For race purses (horses)...... Seni. 1,030 00 Hor special attractions 2TeeMeees 425 00 For premiums on horses... $324 00 For premiums on cattle... 915 24 For premiums on sheep.... 495 25 For premiums on swine... 351 12 For premiums on poultry.. 599 51 For premiums on farm PEGdUCE -. Lf. Tle. es 368 90 For premiums on dairy MEOUUGES: .4Hh fd... 6505, 96 37 For premiums on domestic. 930 31 For premiums on fruits... 172 84 For premiums on miscel- TAMCOUS Ss ashe! PF... ere s,- 448 93 NOTES) > ae a epee ta en ee ae Ee 4,702 47 374 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PRATTSBURGH UNION. RECEIPTS. HMrom Pate Pecetptal sey. o.3e be wae eee $491 86 From rent of@privileges........559 0% 60 00 From entries for preminmisssx ier. . hive 185 00 From entries, for races (horse)........ 22 15 From advertising in fair book........ 84 25 From bonds issued, notes given or any other obligations, sx lacebie bashes 550 00 Ota MECOMD UB a ooo dy0 ce Kc tgs toes Ue at ee ee ee DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other OBHPATIONS .5....5.500 654 CR RS ae $105 83 For rent of ground. :..'. . @%.G58 .. 84 75 00 Bor balloons 2s ass swans Ree eres 75 00 Or TA DOR oie oo is He's ai aoxeincete Ores oases 31 10 Bor tacerial io eaid-saecale Siege e.esece 2 he 22 87 Foray; straw and ‘gram 2... 27 18 OP VENICE, er Ane See Nees ae hee ee 55 00 Mor bane ccs pie eee e scot eee Tree 40 00 For salaries: Secretary, $50; office assistants, $22; police, $12; judges, POS EOLA S Oe tes siete Sete eis sss rea meenare e 90 00 For race purses (horses): “5 SF2.. 22. ATie4g For premiums on horses... $103 00 For premiums on cattle... 105 00 For premiums on sheep... 122 00 For premiums on swine... 19 00 For premiums on poultry. . 31 25 For premiums on farm PCOWUCE News as eate ee 35 55 For premiums on dairy PORGOLUICERS foc ta'at ia natn Rea si 7 50 For premiums on domestic. 167 50 $1,393 86 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 375 For premiums on flowers... $19 25 For premiums on fruits... 41 50 For premiums on miscel- E02 CS re 18 75 “1 1) BE et a me St pe ety pt $670 30 ioesioisbursements 212).. Nebo. eee # $1,363 77 erlamee (CRedil) 2.3 . geome vena cee chs dele wagons 30 09 es SOUTHERN STEUBEN. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $203 88 Memmi ate TeCCIPLS. 22s. o.cte eee e $531 42 Bron rent Of privileges... 50... 22... 70 00 From entries for premiums.......... 101 82 From entries for races (horse)....... 50 00 SD ii) SE tee ee ir mI Ma nae 907 38 CE COUER OT CLOUT 5 ow oie ase oo ein soll ee A LE, 1,660 62 PAMELOR CITES: 5.5... wma). md aa CRS eRe Sees lek $1,864 50 DISBURSEMENTS. For permanent improvements........ $250 00 For labor, advertising, etc........... 236 65 For salaries: Secretary, $25; treas- urer, $25; office assistants, $14; police, $9; judges, $10; superintend- MMe COUR cr 6o b. 5 5 2= apn asi e 4/5) waite 115 00 For race purses (horses)............. 365 00 For premiums on horses... $170 00 For premiums on cattle... 155 00 For premiums on sheep.... 141 00 For premiums on swine... 56 00 For premiums on poultry.. 46 25 376 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For premiums on farm produce: . 2c 27 sce tose $31 00 For premiums on dairy PLOAMCTS Hi OSG wo jemeee 2 50 For premiums on domestic. 71 95 For premiums on flowers. . Tio For premiums on fruits... 19 50 For premiums on miscel- lAneoms » Annee k Wee tae yes 47 00 ROL AN verciwre cate, tine hc atone eh eae te Total disbursements 4.52) 42 eee ee Balance (Che). 2). 2 sicciis anc pesteie eae ee ee eevee $1,714 60 $149 90 a SSS NORTHERN TIOGA. RECEIPTS. Om Cate TCCEIMEN, 6.5 ces he sc eee Prom rent Of Sromngs. 20). co die bos Kromvirent, of. privileges. ..c. 6s ccece PTOM AGrand StANG sis 2. ical se on Brome Tay SOLUS s ipayclraseos «alto do sx be yikes From, advertising....:,.\. -2yreMseeou a From entries for races (horse)....... Prom, COMatiOne pes. sia EPROM, NOLES, GIVEN. ec: .. nok HOE From State. 2 .2,. . + + teensy | D4 378 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE DRYDEN. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900..... Brom: PATS TE CCLNES sais oo, 5 os seis ieee eye $2,026 POM STAN: SCAT cits tac asc) e a are ee 456 Prom rent of privileges. : oo. ws os ps 668 From entries for premiums.......... 208 Brom miscellaneous :'..023s% .. 56006065 84 From entries for races (horse)....... 600 POMYAGVERLISING :. 5). sicisiciptccts ote Ok ae 686 From bonds issued, notes given or any other GDIISATION Des... .cesc eee se 1,500 COMMS EAUE, toe Nei eo clsjc es eee hem 8 2,247 Receipts, for 90M. 0. 226) AS EE so awa OO Se Total sTeCerpts.. «seg eevee a eee ches cok oe DISBURSEMENTS. For payment of bonds, notes or other OVMGAUONS Bove cies ace + ase cca wee ote $1,493 Mor purchase of lands... NM Aa. bcc te 94 For permanent improvements........ 308 POP PUAIOR stare ob eee 2 see we eee 169 Wor Meaberial si). pee «sae ee a eee 544 For advertising, $950.18; miscellane- GUS, $204.88" ‘totale... Ya Feb. ide 1,215 Gr aictCaCUOMB:, . he ate usp eee ee ok 600 For salaries: Secretary, $100; treas- urer, $100; office assistants, $45; police, $76.75; judges, $100.70; super- intendent, $39.75; helpers, etc., PL6hbt” total. 2ott Sels8 oa, Aaa 623 For race purses (horses)............. 1,490 For premiums on horses... $150 00 For premiums on cattle.... 537 50 For premiums on sheep.... 188 00 00 $214 42 8,478 93 $8,693 35 COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 379 For premiums on swine.... $96 00 For premiums on poultry.. 503 25 For premiums on farm PEOMUCE) Peco. Sis sks se 149 50 For premiums on dairy COOUCES. ~ Fae Tae. ss wee 21 00 For premiums on domestic. 559 40 For premiums on flowers. . 38 20 For premiums on fruits... 35 15 For premiums on miscel- EOI isis ev leve's son, 6 oo ae 252 65 Geet ors see Lino seyetesiiste chides whe a elie $2,481 25 MGtAal GIS DUFSEMENES. 5... . ol: Bee o.oo oratet oharoletereletoreters $9,021 11 Ese) ACM GLE LOG) od agate: ce eet ag + eee le $327 76 UNION AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY (TRUMANSBURGBH). RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900....... $489 62 MEGieateurecei pts. 2... ike eee oe $1,483 04 Hromiigrand stand’. .... 06s... ese ees 192 60 NrOmerent OF PLivileges..c sc... 6 oc eo 208 00 From entries for races (horse)....... 45 00 EOmUONAMONS Ps. PF 25 Asche « ¢ «58h le oe 355 27 Eons WmHISCElAMNEOUS. .. Ten... owe ee es Lol AL BOMB SAL Ake sists tieesie arsine etd eee 1,821 48 ee ea ns CN nM Mag. ss aye othe oo oe acts, 2 cceenatele 3,706 50 JIG N Lee ie TO ell eke Meme pee es meant meiteh iT 4,196 12 DISBURSEMENTS. For permanent improvements........ $88 18 PER ees DIE os oS ao, seca were cte catehe Sake 89 32 ROM GemisOf STOUNAS 00,65 scree eee 125 00 380 NintH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE For advertising ...)....... SRR: For sundry expenses. .... 05d ence For salaries: Secretary, $25; office assistants, $8; police, $55; judges, $13.50; superintendent, $15; helpers, SUC 20.15% tOual >, Ahaha sae For race purses (horses). ..!. //..... For premiums on horses... $166 For premiums on cattle... 81 For premiums on sheep.... 124 For premiums on swine.... 52 For premiums on poultry. . 54 For premiums on farm GRO. 5 i i 21 For premiums on domestic. 177 For premiums on flowers. . 20 For premiums on fruits... 48 For premiums on miscel- HARPCOUIG Stat ects te hase 439 Ota. ss 5, cee. cols cive swe > hens Total Gisburseniehte ser . cites Cones «eae» ORO Balamee: (GPEGih) oo... avscveu sedessy eee ade tsa $237 25 708 92 143 25 532 50 1,183 32 $3,107 74 $1,088 38 NEWARK FATR ASSOCIATION. RECEIPTS. rom) Sate PeceIptite er. «os. se ee From rent of privileges............ From entries for premiums........ irom eran Stag. esis feranee aioede tes From entries for races (horse)...... PPO STALE. cis slots. se vate a1. 0/0 sie at ses o- “-. Total, TECAiObS.i.-.isisa wp oss « Reh cog Ree ee COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE. 381 DISBURSEMENTS. Balance due at close of fiscal year 1900 $1,089 O01 PES A i.e RR es Ta See Be 49 00 For permanent improvements........ 14 65 aE AREMACTIONSUOE Tis. sce sa Cues 30 00 i cerAMO EA OR Leia. sina > een 184 12 ene paMabertal Go. eles eee wee les 35 15 Por rent‘of barmand tents........... 25 00 Herthiay and Straw. 0... 0.. 0. 228 ee 32 36 For telephone and water rent........ 8 15 For salaries: Secretary, $50; office assistants, $17.50; police, $7; total. 74 50 Por-race pursesa(horses). ...u:. 0. -ppis 360 00 For premiums on horses... $317 25 For premiums on cattle... 250 00 For premiums on sheep.... 148 50 For premiums on swine.... 89 00 For premiums on poultry. . 102 50 For premiums on farm BP OOUIEGS Goo. fon 3500.5 fe :00 00 8 « 109 00 For premiums on _ dairy TORO CCL So. er 4 75 For premiums on domestic. 221 65 For premiums on_ imple- ments and machines..... 42 50 For premiums on flowers. . 8 50 For premiums on fruits... 151; 15 For premiums on miscel- PABCOMIS: . 052 60.3. 2 «02s 2 15 OA 2s eh cos. ee eon 1,448 15 Porawdishursements .......95 09 t.6/<5 sls mie eres $3,350 09 iBatance? (ebit)2u\iaue hes... 0.0 Spee: cee $824 41 382 Ninto ANNUAL REPORT OF .THE PALMYRA. UNION. RECEIPTS. Balance on hand at close of fiscal year 1900..... From rent of/erounds.....:.. 2. .8i0 $71 From. rent of privileges. . 0.0. 4...... 209 From annual! imembers............+.. 1,895 POM) MON AVION Se. (ce teie oa) eee cae saie tel aunts 5 cori! SEALE MM: Gees ore eosin 2h ecieeyays pe 1,304 HVCCEID US TOT et GUL Sts): ah bia Aes see's Seem oper Toil TCE ES, ije.c . cee eae Meee ee eee oe DISBURSEMENTS. For permanent improvements........ $208 VON ADOT So cies on nie as oe ae eee eee 640 - POOF AMALIA. bss AS ek dtoet ce hoe ee ae 1,578 For band, $45; ash wood, $75; hay and straw, $25; water, $8; total........ 153 For painting, $65.61; printing, $62.25; insurance, $70.63; revenue tax, $8.35; 1.0.1 6 a em OMI Rb Ok eer an 206 For delegate’s expenses, $26.18; an- nual dues, $5; sundries, $13.56; ADU Foes ic 3 222 65 For miscellaneous, attorneys’ fees and SISBUPSEMICTIES. 2.0.0 «00+ cidemels gine 88 68 Gre aIWUSeEMmeNtS.......8..ccungecees 109 90 Hor rent of grounds......2.2.:.-%+. 295 75 For salaries: Secretary, $50; treas- urer, $25; office assistants, $80; police, $37; judges, $21; superin- tendent, $29; helpers, etc., $11; total. 253 00 For race purses (horses)............. 445 00 For premiums on horses... $86 00 For premiums on cattle... 94 00 For premiums on sheep... 72 00 For premiums on swine... 20 00 For premiums on poultry.. 92 00 For premiums on farm MOTOR 55 5 5 ee eas ie np so 90 50 For premiums on domestic. 291 -00 For premiums on flowers.. 31 50 For premiums on fruits... 49 75 For premiums on miscel- RMIT ciars.:a:@ '<)?s2 hay Soin te 20 60 EN tk hyo aha a tote Acted a saeco 847 35 Moppral MISMUTSCIIENUS < o:6 ccc. ene ace 2 o/e me aioe el ois yme pe madame Balance’ (Credit) 2.2.5 vss ek eee eles eee 25 385 $2,375 08 $3,835 22 3,018 76 $216 46 ee We ve aitntouk Fi AG Ey Bi few galevicn! Se hae ba tyere 00 GALS ‘4 > ray Detia al mates, gaderwere Ne 4 p hha , ie ate oy a (ers ea 5 whey Par Poe Fern te PG be tae lgd ola va ve ’ . \ fi : oe ? * Phos toe eee ee acl) hl Ca . . nit’ is a aie? ‘ ne to bp Foe bad ah We 4) inte ernie eieie ewe ae ee ee ee 15-17 SCCONG /GUVISIOM (6. 6 coteiare erace, oie ssa tea ates teats dove) ernie) aera tiehe eee nene . 128, 129) C. Cambridge Valley Agricultural Society and Stock Breeders’ Associa- tion, ‘himancial TreportsOl. aviocts oe. cue ceisler ere 255, 256 Cape Vincent Agricultural Society, financial report of........... BPE Sas" Catskill Mountain Agricultural Society, financial report OLR Se 347, 348 Cattaraugus County Agricultural Society, financial report of.... 261, 262 Cayuga County Agricultural Corporation, financial report of.... 263, 264 Chautauqua County Fair, financial report of.................. 264, 265. Chemung County Agricultural Society, financial report of...... 265, 266 Chenango County Agricultural Society, financial report of...... 266, 267 Cheese) «5,5 Sac ene NOGODO OC ORG TOTS DOG Ur oO uaon onoe Sate a ShoyessasLete ierekee 17-38 Cheese brand) sreculations 335. ss 2sc1e acces ee Ca ee Eee Ee 13) eels SAMI IO s 5 \oys ic) avai suayecs) ore vow teis omy 5. sae ate us actorehenevencue ua olehe LOL Te teehee ein ietekeen eens 18: Cheese brands, law under which issued..... Fons Rio, wale wiissy GEE Sone 19 MSG OF, ISSted: VOU save ais Siele.c eS. ok lcgereis wacky esonctersvousieneis ele eee enn ioe 20-34 Cheese, butter and, receipts of, New see CHOY. cischoisterentereieeterye sake 135 EXMOLES MOLL 5 ais 5 oe Wistales co ore] oynre’ och eieve ouevoneleretoletocnte eieieneie Seaerererenare one 136 factories and creameries, ninth division, .5 ~~ -. » <2... sele «=e 223. 10 Ee eee Eee re tr et aco io mondo coo cc 130, i131 monthly average price, New YOrkielty.. cis selec eicienstele siete cians irene 134 products, butter and, biennially for ten years.............c..e+-- 36 SCCONMMOLVISTONG reer ere sera erais iene HEP ide aio coranba Sad 5 129: Clark JAMES WPs srepOLEnOl seit avs,6 vie sialeiele ate ereutrerste dere ey nisme team tenes 232-237 Clinton County Agricultural Society, financial report of........ 267, 268 Cobleskill Agricultural Society, financial report of.............. 312, 373 Columbia Agricultural and Horticultural Association, financial report QOL Lin os tans sate ns 0:05 yr 0 Ges (Spin. 5 Siw, oe a 0 eeXe Lope Netoataneiaen& shale Tai eet tes eae 345, 346. Columbia County Agricultural Society, financial report of........269, 270 CoMMISsioner; “TePOLRE OT. acs, scois a revioie setedeie aie secereitie sieves ele cnet een 7-123: Gondensed mii Sees. sic sets eetrecc ta verakacetn Sais ln oe tenis Le anole cee 45, 46 DLOSCCWULOMS) 5ia'dic iosz:iaie casas vavelavalsics sabaphavayotakate)-a ate, sweleistens agelaiienetrarankonenetenets 45 Contagious diseases of domestic animals, ninth division......... 225, 226 CHIT GVALVISIONY . ciancie ects c atetst ay eleteker eeotstave ka 2 seus (orb aushslettale, suateisheepetenpencte re 184 Cortland County Agricultural Society, financial report of......... 270-272 Cream; ‘Third GUVISLOM, sis giats-< avs oie opel's athaushes 2.6 2) amie, leila le yatetece steve niatatagsterate 182 Cuba Fair and Racing Association, financial report of.......... 336, 338 INDEX. 461 2 PAGE, Dairy products, receipts and value of, for twenty years, New York MOU UAV watate cas Jhs' ciel Seapsooysycichegcys ee Praacie iG fs. « op hesbrepeae ciel era there ty corte aot 137-153 Delaware County Agricultural Society, financial report of....... 22 ees Delaware Valley Agricultural Society, financial report of........ 348, 349 WENALEMENt, WORKING (diVviISlONSAOL., «ce vec tele) c) cl siaic)e\s slaiers cle. aye) sielers etopietels a miseased cattle, swine and, fourth division. ...........2..¢- s+. 189, 190 ea fats TAY, LTV STONY ' fepereveira:eheray ero 2s Revere eel cite) «telat anete seb. /2Ualsie Msialeyseyenetepeusis 192-194 Dryden Agricultural Society, financial report of................ 378, 379 Dundee Fair Association, financial report of..................-. 384, 385 Dutchess County Agricultural Society, financial report of........ 2738, 274 E. Hh EMCTVISION, Mk PLOSECUMONS ES: a sildetre SAS Se leas SER re 218-220 PADICS) «<<<. Se arehe urchn oie hele eevee eine eta es ravelot a) coe) afoh ovelsr ass, as) aie Vee ere 217 WIE: pAOPRETS ROO ORO ae Od a einrnuchs 5 Or LEIChORG COI GREECE RAEI Ic 217, 218 Higqnimra Malleus) (eIANGETS) . wicics 04-010 were set ahaeNpea owe ls see cel ese 240-245 Erie County Agricultural Society, financial report of............ 21D e206 Essex County Agricultural Society, financial report of........... PAA, Pat (Ti BPRHIOTEES OL DUGEEIS, csr: fee, 0 c=, w jee acee ateevse alaice, dois, o/s, ci avetajie a /ere 3-0 fo Slaps atatocle 136 and cheese since 1883, New York City... .. .- sje cjewle eos oe ae ele 154-157 BEIRONES OL CHEESC. 2.0.5 /s.5. 4-0; 0:00.55 ai ef sikareysncbo-sleveyarcyats! ayeyesard sy «fore lol otey> spaveeks 136 F. Su LVISION, GiSCASCM GAtEIOs sccs- cis ccc ames ac cues olsen eas 192-194 MONETTE tgs code tampon Oricon OnDOCDoUdoIS DLidcIooudaD cot 00x 192 BHM CMCHECS Ctra eco octet chavs =7e soos ete ey nj as alta. ln "a (oe te olla Lars leo Sao eve mee eet U3) ais4il HonEuhVaivasion. DOD: VEAL isc csc Foes oa beac tee. wee ne oe e Se Ame ee 189 diseased: Cattle: andes wile™ 25.264 256 Fete cec ie etee See etee 8 erence 189, 190 EOMTAT CATCH ts thimete atl Menean sek ore stn a oer ails totes stoic, cewek rate ene 188, 189 paris green and linseed oil ............. HER, Sh A PIO TART caetee te ets 189 MEMO VATE © WUUTOI ae totals tate a tefederetutere latotate bolctonctelats lee eats mietarotens ener emactone 189 SHEUTDYOIVESY TEMG S8 Sas, yes taenges Crpnedowb: Cus Oionn Ch. OiOi0O, QOjUO oIOD- OOOO omabIOCID.S 187, 188 WHA oe lesb ada uceuds bic0- 0,0 Ub UbIO emo dua capicione col ae.c% 189 Franklin County Agricultural Society, financial report of........ 278, 279 Franklinville Agricultural and Driving Park Association, financial re- x (DOM: Gir gine Bedi ewleGAe soddo Cod damn Ooo cd rE cnUmuomod Had 341, 342 Fulton County Agricultural Society, financial report of.......... 279-281 G. ‘Genesee County Agricultural Society, financial report of........ 281, 282 Gpiadcrs (cquinia- malleus) aves inciys . SAR eRe Rs lee 240-245 Gorham Agricultural Society, financial report of................ 356, 357 Gouverneur Agricultural and Mechanical Society, financial report EMRE 8 ote tiene ioe aon Beart sistetos Berek sie flese hi ee oo eran ates 368, 369 ‘Grant. dohn H., report: Of. .). 2. oar ateieteiete Salsivisleie'e dysiene ae foawortesecet 221-231 ‘Greene County Agricultural Society, financial report of.......... 283, 284 462 INDEX. Hf. PAGE, Hemlock Lake Union Agricultural Society, financial report of.... 289, 290 Herkimer County Agricultural Society, financial report of....... 284, 285 Hornellsville Farmers’ Club, financial report of...............-.---- 255: Hughes) WwW illiami Wy eport Ole c acs sc eee era ccis «eee: raat eee 212-220) Tr. Index toaericnlturaltlawisce coset oe eee Ee 469478 Inspection; nursery ‘and orchard: 7.42 - see ee eee ee 113-119 Inspections! third Vai vistors vecice ects tianaeicier crear ce nie reenetere AP ake J. Jefferson County Agricultural Society, financial report of......... 285-287 Ke Kelly;AWilliam) Henry, report; £4), % omcexcsin ees oe See cate eter 238-250: Kracke, hH)..Ji.. El.,, LEDOLETOR EAR Ss SE ee ciate te 127-180. L. awe index’ tovagricultural- 2.522.425. bee cee ee ae ee ee eee 469478 Baw under which cheese brands issued)... .).....%, <0 1 sees coelee cele ere 19 Lewis County Agricultural Society, financial report of........... 287, 288 ist.or cheeserbrandsassued: LOOM 2. cv cilele crepes eae Sepcteetaicns 20-34 M. Maple:sugar and maple syrups... cn... soe cies hea ereE ere VADs poll Male A rao SS tele tet sees “ec '5,5. bre ate eles oie eee Oy ao babe bree eas teieiee 39 amount received in New York city, 1888 to 1901................. 45 and Yeream”’ received in “Buftalo .).c <2 © vcs a the orcuasensts Foye eis to exerele See 222 CASES) SIXtM GIVISTON) 22 ooee coed beans cee me cece ae ae aetna 201-208. CONGENSEG 2.) oo Sie cise ce eielets leis eis tee hace Whe loicte cane ae tate tere ey drorenecmeae «aed 40s TO Dinh’ GiVISLIOM © cece cc ase ie else eee css osha teTeneeae etches ahetebeiatal sistaiete voupeely, 222 DLESELVATIVe CASE; ISEXEM CLVISIOM =~ «1-2 scyel -f-helsi-terieieienele ite sieeve tae 203 prosecutions ...... Ussher SO.COOOORB ODOC ec ieieishaetetepeieeore ages 39-42 MAMA hp tease Good ons. 1.65 AOOOdODOO0.ddao dod dodo no oc _ 218-220: Mifith \Givision i> Fu. echoes soc eke eee Ow eee 227, 228, 229, 230 Seventh WivisiOm* 8h chs. ce trtreete etal es wate tele totaal atetonens 210, > 28 CENEN GLVISION® FA 5 Peete sed can eee all le ea sic eels at Ae ote os. 235, 236 second division 19. }20q99: LARA. oes LI ees ost 12024028 Shipping: Sixth: eno Bee! 121,)0122 INDEX. 463 AGE. Monroe County Agricultural Society, financial report of......... 298, i 294 Montgomery County Agricultural Society, financial report of...... 291-293 Monthly average price of butter, New York city................. 133, 134 of cheese, New York city........... Be aha e ee OT TE bene ETO eto 134 Morris Fair Association, financial report of.................... . 261, 362 N. Naples Union Agricultural Society, financial report of........... 358, 359 Newark Fair Association, financial report of...............eee0. 880, 381 New York city, amount of milk received, 1888 to 1901............... 45 Niagara County Agricultural Society, financial report of.......... 295-297 NINERNGLVISION, pOArns: ANG: COWASCADICS. <0) cio oe ciesc © ee scien cin cienercreteretete 226 BODE VES ioe reraiacccsic te separate aicreieieielsie avo oi e1s: 6 ae) pistes raberorcner tence ree 225 WEOSCCUUIOIMS ie ayaye sic tistats ameieiects cisitiars a 0s w avec ciomienns aa EOL cheese factories and creameries in. :.........c.ccccccccecececece 223 CONTACTOUSTOISCASe OL AN IMIAISS Sere cuss emus cits cree ace a cueeceneeeeaie ter ene 229, 226 VN Kaerorayebepay chal sheer to's" si avove seus elleusc-levey takeesom verte cheer clo or aemretereNee Ppa lel Depp ANAL HOROSECULLOMS yay stousisrora tes a cucier oves cr lepers cheneterere vet sy are) & 221, 228, 229, 230 oleomargarine ond renovated. butter... ...ccasees + ce easeee « 220, 2a OlCOMAT LATING) PLOSCCULLONS) o. cusheyevonsyehsuaeqeieicaeiusiereisiccerstenciemeetets 206 HET LE VA SLO Mins, + prisictedeevshccsya'sia.8\s o orekeres wie © auc Toreuaneletetete eicteter terete 183, 184 Oneida County Agricultural Society, financial report of.......... 297, 298 Oneonta Union Agricultural Society, financial report of......... 362, 363 Ontario County Agricultural Society, financial report of.......... 298-800 Orange County Agricultural Society, financial report of......... 800, 301 Orleans County Agricultural Society, financial report of......... 302, 303 Oswegatchie Agricultural Society, financial report of............ 369, 370 Oswego County Agricultural Society, financial report of......... 3038, 304 Otsego County Agricultural Society, financial report of.......... 805, 306 187-190 Owens L: SAMES) GEPOMt Olen cine cries sre ncror- soles cy oP rane reste oi starevate ot tiehe 464 INDEX. ¥ PAGE Palmyra Union Agricultural Society, financial ECDOGL ROG 4+. os cris 382, 383 Paris green and linseed oil, fourth division «so. sec.00 tee oener os oe 189 People v. John S. Biesecker (preservaline)...........c.eecccceecce 47-105 Pepplesy, Mathew Wiard (Vinegar )rrseuie deticien othe cccniontenuua ce ae bs Phoenix Union Agricultural Society, financial report of.......... 300, 306 Prattsburgh Union Agricultural Society, financial report of...... 374, 375 Prattsville Horticultural and Agricultural Society, financial report OE a rapchew ss ci cteieie, ia (aie oye" eral Selves Sune doetn ine Heteee ee ano Eee 351, SoZ BLOSCVVAlING viajes ess Sp ecege stale eidaneie Tale oats cae ee Ee 46 Preston; HH: vds, LCDOLC OL 5 vice caicn is ohoiats cleicusleadts atchsiet tetas eee 181-186 Brosecutions:. bob \ Veal’. ie ..c%s:slevekia icteyag agole savers spd sere etree, ace eaters 110 Condensed? my 02ers i atiaevee a onsca steve ws lay ie nee Ets eee ei Cee 45 FIPCHRAIVISION Urs ER dostge eee oe one. ease ee DER GOL CO Einintee 192 VDDD seo eS ya. one ier 3 50d race tops Gatlahe aye wie aioe 3 eee vey) eyo eUnals rena aie RetS aleP eee aeons 39-42 SCCOMG GL VASO” oi avai es cres'e settee cite wSilalcce capers) in oatale sale eer SusypkereReet ees 161-167 thindGivisiony. aeeets «cee: S Ghbecoaie etadaa ei ele inte oi eitbeie Grateaeteare eit 185, 186 VALENS SATS Ge vc royteray ceva Pete ante sol Sopavouel au chdutcqepstal & sysue'yspeyoh ocous soneverohtuere teu eheteral saeesiolts 106 Putnam County Agricultural Society, financial report of.......... 306, 307 R. Rabiessreiohth: GiviSlonmbyAs ie sew wie o tertietere-o eccies onsietors ateavaleeeicaeteee eters PALE SEVEN tHEGI VISION) 4 stlieead S ctelas Sotad eater peGnr tac cere Sere 207 HOME HAUVISTON evry sisi peters cree sero less secs fe elev eyasecele) oe lesodeieunsolee fe eee 232-234 Racquette Valley and St. Regis Valley Agricultural and Horticul- HUT AT SOC HY asco. sia sis Sie. Farzparara aime. 0/'a elu 19 BU Sus ee, Gilegis tee odes ope oereen gee 370-372 Receipts and value of dairy products for twenty years, New York UDG) SoA ere aes cio wits e Gicene eel oaehorte Sriaeh ev era (Spayacatacorcponereten shoncvats ior oteieie ener 187-153 Receipts of milk, unsweetened condensed milk and cream in New MV OVC, 2.5.5 S55 says rsve.o ai's, cys olets cus eyes isle tye) a1) sre, pte clapaleita uaa teva eiete sl store eee 168-180 Receipts under olemargarine law (Internal Revenue)................ 182 RECOMIMENGATIONS aie ose as clara, tpove i sce 'ae oieors at ap stelel cues iam loreal ener oneiete 123 Reeulations Cheese nina Ge mec eric: crete sletele cieteeeiheleraete tei iete ete ithe Ue Renovated: utter sc: s-< cote yoacus sarees aeieie tev als is lal slo, sleliei maces fabel ay spare ten renee 15-17 LOUTTMAGIVASION 4 «octets oa kere cpa cle Mevohewrele Sse loce ape ave fers; cicdentoacletenetontene 189 PROSECUTIONS. NINE GiviSlOU nc seretetars sieves <1 eters ctene cic terere ieee 229 GENT GT WASTON: Vo) atey's Specs oysccre Gps poy sboces pis: uanete cee tip se. sco seun ie le geleuejecepeiaket eames 184 Rensselaer County Agricultural and Horticultural Society, financial MA VUMUE AAG oOo, “ACU COONS SOCIO OOH Ondo OF dboU Ke ADOb Go bonSS 310, 311 RMeEPOLIMOt \VERIEtt Ce BeCDG se tc cohecuels sir ececroieh= a.) elarsi tel eoinele +... 205-211 VAMOS EE, COLA ea satheyencxverege Fas islaeneie kas eseioarcseotopaes ska ee che stein tettaeeete 232-237 COMMISSION ET tichasd. 6c! shapei shevads oie Veus louebatale anccanoreusbalencls Ser euclee Gece iene 7-123 eV GLIA y EW. AS ATUE no, Perce sveutre ecko ebueuely etoile SiR ES EIGLG CE Eee 221-231 WV AMM ea at SS TET WTO Bp oa fay cass sod ty scocas coca Gaabsnsorslene to eleceiais eas aie eee tone 212-220 yiiliamas Eveniny “ICellliv: cv nyeisre, scdarpase idle jana alone trakste ereverattisueiiteterarrers 238-250 INDEX. 465 PAGE TROOP Ce INA ds 18h USK. 66 cogddad0 dood aduDEoepognsoagaboON sc 127-180 Aer INL eSS + O wie Swayecewateerei acy axes lellelate ers chal etoliclin ces eley NeU ovale l-Vefelielooieuctaks 187-190 TOY og Rae Bik) Koha pe eri cinro SEES OGG COM OG DOCOGREDG OO DOUe OL arc 181-186 SA Blog RiCl ard SOM roves eo ererereVors oie onctclaieol= ienohe! olaletiatolon etelletattelsits 191-195 Olea fou WIM STC ee Besar om Grcudomes aemuen on tde Saou oD or 196-204 FUGHALASOM IS SLOW NE DOM Olsscieysyele'- racieeiale aie © = \e/-helelelehalele(olel wieiehens \s.elerarere) chevoiei syetete a creaneens erCEmete 203 WOTK: Ne arete cis crete hice els lee eee De oe Cine ye\ernerore se iLTSe OneTEI AIT E UE eT 199-201 Societies, moneys apportioned to agricultural................... 121, 22 Southern Steuben Agricultural Society, financial report of........ 275, 276 Statement of Salaries: and’ @xpenses:.2 = 7.1. c/o ier oo obs one (efor le cai oe Steuben County Agricultural Society, financial report of........ 320, 321 Suffolk County Agricultural Society, financial report of.......... 321, o2e Sullivan County Agricultural Society, financial report of........ 322, 323 Summary? Of work, (Second *diVviSiome fareeicie icine ercderteraicicyeroe erro 158-160 7. Tenth division, milk prosecutions. .\.. .% <..-< ssi ale « « sle\e co cere stron eisicice a WVOLIS;) HALT MOL VASTOMNN stoysrs o:4 cratic, © 40: oe Bi ...442, 443 Cheese factories, butter and, regulations in regard to (Art. 2, sec. Dice s ciaaarasie sive seiaia ans saialahal ey cinere? atedogetetopel skebaterons ccacecce fdkOORes SOO INDEX. AT PAGE Cheese-makers, butter- and, expert (Art. 1, sec. 4).................- B91 Cheese, manufacture and sale of imitation, prohibited (Art. 2, see. EAU)! Soham alaiee clete)a selene Se. epee 406 Milk and cream cans, markings on (Art. 2, sec. 24)....... sees eeeees 400- ING New York Agricultural Experiment Station, The (Art. 6, sec. 85). 429, 430: Notice, commissioner to issue—Diseases of Domestic Animals—(Art. SEE MOL ie Sree te ites siesta re a ata rata a tein ipie a tetas" alata ailegeet wtiate in nRsre rs 410, 411 oO. Object and intent of Article II (Art. 2, seC. 36).......eseee cere eeeee 407 Onondaga county, property in town of Geddes—State Fair—(Art. 10, SECH AO) (ayes sjopoverus toile'as otal exe 'ey exe yo oholeyahens sh apavals b¥o talc wha © hn Shu cin /nialoferels\aie . oo Prohibited articles not to be furnished (Art. 2, sec. 28).............. 404 Prohibition of the sale of adulterated milk (Art. 2, sec. 22).......... 398. Promotion of agriculture, receipts and apportionment of moneys for tive CATT: (GHISECS 'SSperpemete tee cre settee te oe ote he tenes Sone lotel eeieter aire ete eaneye 488-438 476 INDEX. PAGE. Property in town of Geddes, Onondaga county—State Fair—(Art. 10, SOC, AQ) 95 63 ays: add scarey axecsteysscyahe ee ¥ake city ee) fiasco heer ach neato our ee 448 Prosecution, for, penalties: (Arts Wyse (8). ere msc ww teres leustste oles 392, 393 Prosecution shall not be compelled to elect, when (Art. 1, sec. 11).... 3894 Q. Quarantined, farms to be; inspection of premises—Diseases of Domestic Animals—(ATt. 45 SCCe ' C2)rvsis c/s sieus shaislonl su nie eye es eects 411 R. . Receipts and apportionment of moneys for the promotion of agricul- EUEE CATE... SCCay ONS) ere szarvaharsieen terse wate cars tops ere Seis apeieae tic Eater eRe arena 433438 Receipts and disbursements—State Fair—(Art. 10, sec. 144)........ +450 Receiving veal for shipment by common carrier—Diseases of Domes- tie, Amiumals—(Art.. 4. SOCs, (OL) ke a x tea cecererelereienciotelen om oie iva ene tenee a eee ANT ‘Regulations and the enforcement thereof—Diseases of Domestic Ani- mais—(AT A. “SOC LGD) ), < eiecveca-ocie)e arenete ous bx nares eave merepoasl aysiel yep ayoneas is 412, 418 Regulations, Federal—Diseases of Domestic Animals—(Art. 4, see. CDG) >< aratese yoy crgcaiesok shai tiers fare Saxe sialelerSesiers -ahava over shateMepepaveeeneys iter al Utne RTs eaele 416 Regulations in regard to butter and cheese factories (Art. 2, sec. AES) ena Sia voliatia fone ec] eusustc ete eysdniseerarte evo Sais ines efaaavs egaeleelen melee oisas takers 399, 400 Regulations in regard to condensed milk (Art. 2, see. 25)......... 400, +01 HEDOrE, mma ale (CAME. les SCC cy) apetersyalerersta ele tetelletelotelalaitatetsteiete tal fetal ietiele 391, 392 Rights of Federal inspectors—Diseases of Domestic Animals—(Art. ds iber =f ORRT (170 | (Re aren ene mn | eee ee SE ho ca se aoe aos Goc06 416 Ss. Sale of adulterated milk, prohibition of the (Art. 2, Sec. 22).......... 398 Selling a commodity in imitation or semblance of honey, relative to— Diseases of, Bees—(ApTt Gs See: SOD) inc S8e Sa cites ses ie Giclees een 423 Shipment, receiving veal for, by common carriers—Diseases of Domestic Animals—~AArt. 4. Gee W0e). 5.0) ewes hee eee 417 Shipping veal—Diseases of Domestic Animals—(Art. 4, sec. TOf)...... 417 Shortititle (Airtel SCC. Wie 2 ara tet it ates tee on cere eels lotehat a ae nae eee 390 Skim milk or skimmed cheese, when prohibition does not apply (Art. PES Caves Le caroveke aes Gis) soles sucka tetotaks ie oike Cala iolade ete eats Us io cal ahake oe ie ota ieee 405, 406 Slaughtering and selling veal for food—Diseases of Domestic Ani- mials—=—(Awt (43 SOCl1 LOC) a ccke ta ese csact-ter tae baieptekcedci dela eeise aeaEe rai 416, 417 Societies, act to amend the membership corporations law relative to agricultural corporations and agricultural (lL. 1902, chap. 582)..455, 456 Siare WW airiCArt. 1O See: 142). c.m & oferc te taraoe ecku-idssieia cast aeieiels 449, 450 State Fair commission—State Fair—(Art. 10, sec. 141)........... 448, 449 State fairs, superintendent of, assistants and employes—State Fair— CATES OS SOC H 4S) !2 0d rerm las acolo oie e o aiinaers one mucye tals exekeyepeteteyoiake fel onatel aE 450 INDEX. 477 PAGE. State manufacturer and the dealer in original packages to file certifi- cate with commissioner of agriculture—Paris green—(Art. 8, sec. TID) pg pam see oe nod ob onc Evo ete ODE pei cUnIGnEmoOnoO cocoo cag a cec 442 Statements; inspections; branding of packages—Sugar Beet Culture— Uti, BEOU (Bsc 05 Shag Someoudlbecicmbod nc Hd dig eDeud bopanucediae 418, 419 Statements to be attached to packages; contents; analysis—Commer- - Giale Weeding Stutis— (CATE Oy SCCH UZ ois 2): -101a2) 1 = 1016) lol ee ale} ele store 444, 445 Statements to be filed with director of agricultural experiment sta- tion, to be accompanied by sample—Commercial Feeding Stuffs— (MEE 2, SO IPPs cp ocebdees cease caGn gud 0d G0 GOD DOo CobabGan on sn.s 445, State Weather Bureau, The (Art. 6, sec. 86)..........02--eeeeeees 4380, 481 Sugar beet culture, commissioner of agriculture to apportion moneys appropriated for promotion of—Sugar Beet Culture—(Art. 5, sec. TO) had hala Ob Sd DOAS OA POOCEDDO COCO TAO OS ITO cO 418 Sugar, maple, and maple syrup (Art. 6, secs. 91 and 92).......... 439, +440 Superintendent of State fairs, assistants and employes—State Fair— (CENTOS Cowl AD) pected hfats set sve steve oletels siete enara tetas s es 0 ee eevee e's, « erel erate: sas 450: Suppression of infectious and contagious disease—Diseases of Domes- fica als——(Atrts AISECNGO)S fare ctsrcere ea tais cle el ctetele)<'e'e euclslele sie elelcieisrate 410 Als Term ‘ concentrated commercial feeding stuffs”? defined—Commer- Gil INseolnnee Simi (ern 8h Sees WAG oo cacandoococnb0cdndKe0 oouGe 444 TiS. leone PLONE Ve SOs ia eeasseecmmooaD mes eocooOndsoctagc coca bo 390 To whom moneys may be distributed, persons, etc.—Sugar Beet Cul- cue —— WAGE ISEC. UA) ore ciercka eves susre\oial ccla\ /Sieious oieiepaicicateualondtel a sfleretetcuetots 418 TieAaS mM CoumAy (Ci 2, SCS Gi) )dsnooce cepa ocooUOCoOdGC UD OoCUS 407 ie Unclean or unsanitary surroundings, keeping miik cans, vessels, etc., iin, (Wels 2a RG, BAYS oc bs coed bdpadanono nado ooDICODO UD OC UD GOOD OO KOC 406 Winiversitv. ahe: Cormell (Art IG ISCCh Sievers a cekedelelalelels! level areleletatel 431443: Use of coloring matter prohibited (Art. 2, secs. 29 and 29a)....... 404, 405 Wsecor talse brand prohipiteds (Art: 2) sees 34). 2)... ci. « «se is ce we sere 407 Vv. Veal, receiving, for shipment by common carriers—Diseases of Domestic: Animails—(Art. 4. SCG. TOP) cc, cteisis = siete sis sleoi crete telelelel = 417 shipping—Diseases of Domestic Animals—(Art. 4, sec. 70f)...... 417 slaughtering and selling, for food—Diseases of Domestic Ani- INN S— CAM Gert ase CNG) neers ayeieierstar shetelereiieie When prohibition does not apply to skim milk or skimmed cheese (Art. D” S6@s BL) ocd eke eee Rie cele Seoaiele aa oh Nereis oe Saiehe Teens ee eee 405, PAGE. 406 When prosecution shall not be compelled to elect (Art. 1, sec. 11).. 394-896 iu pongueeet tet nt ene eae or ee tees : Nienaie tears Saurus at SPRL eer