potas Wintec Lie stoi Aneel tester i — * eA = Veer Ses Sanaa ww pears ANS eae AS ee siete SSR Se Ce rahe & SENN te red = pas Lies Se, 3 tage <=: SI tes iy 133 i - eh t uh 3) $ ; eas va oe oF We ees 3 o Ain Hs Ss iM exe Reis katces! ron BAS Oa i xe ses 7, ifs vs i Ty spheric Shy ies 2 >be Re, ae %; prises Sys i * Y > etecetespeler ies Vee _— att Qnas ye Pes (Ul ATE : ieA GN er sanity) the ty i lai, g ut Ke ef j BOY st ht is au 1a ua FORTY-SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT Missour1 State Board of Agriculture A Record of the Work for the Year 1913 Also Report of Missouri Farmers’ Week, 1914, Association Meetings, Farm Statistics and Other Information and Papers Relating to Agriculture and Its Allied Industries PUBLISHED 1914 THE HUGH STEPHENS PRINTING COMPANY JEFFERSON CITY, MO. tere OFFICERS OF THE STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. President—P. P. Lewis, Crescent. Vice-President—W. R. Wilkinson, St. Louis. Secretary—Jewell Mayes, Columbia. Assistant-Secretary—W. L. Nelson, Columbia. Treasurer—W. A. Bright, Columbia. Institute Lecturer—J. Kelly Wright, Columbia. Institute Lecturer—Miss Bab Bell, Columbia. State Veterinarian—Dr. D. F. Luckey, Columbia. Apiary Inspector—M. E. Darby, Springfield. Dairy Commissioner—E. G. Bennett, Carthage. EX OFFICIO MEMBERS. Governor Elliott W. Major. Dean Agricultural College F. B. Mumford. CORPORATE MEMBERS. (Term expires July 20, 1914.) Cong. District Name. Residence. 22.0) CCR ROAR TE Jichnehia Braytone sso. 5.0 ae: Ranistegeicriecte- 3) 5/5" 0. caCORE Jal (Ca ID races ae ean eoiocctrns @Sborneren eee Mr SCIEN oat reco SMP LLeCICKet © 5 Sona ces tute Buckner: see. 113).3 Sohne nee ane ene iS; 1S3 Symialk. 5 Ss ooalsieg co co on ceNAANINeAONG, oe ale oc 1A oie eae ae (GAN IEEBaAEnestec cr a Arie cout ee Mairstonen rience NGA te ace ae 2 Ave dlwiNielSomifeai.s ice crise ae orks ebanonemat ere: (Term expires July 20, 1915.) il. 5 et ORy ER Rene enone ES Nie wloml pic erences sre cents Lewistown....... 4. 5. oS een Chass Bellowsemermrres ia Miarsyavalle tanec eee 0 5 ee ING BIE (Gia alae ey eects cameras Sedalliarmanarsacc be 0 6 Se eee W: A; Dallmeyer..............Jefferson City... . 1D), oid eae ene ee Jiohngbankersrmeme-r cao. a canthages =... boy. (Term expires July 20, 1916.) (Oe aiguoiiee Ecker Mache We Ilias see ate oe aise - iit wn woeee cielo cub ore De Saree Lloleea eee Jiohma)|eaWalketteld: 555 .0e see lexXiGOs-e a. oe e- 10) 5 3. RA Gee eeReaeane mA CWASR alanis «tha teense (Grescent)is cess a JUL 3) Glee ae Chinispeilkeseaenne hee eben le Ouis)- 12 5. acta Re ee cata WAS IR NSIS Bink Boe bce St. Louis. (3) Superintendent of Schools W. P. Evans. County. .... Monroe. .St. Francois. .New Madrid. . Laclede. Lewis. . Nodaway. Pettis. Cole. .Henry. Audrain. .St. Louis. Missourt Agricultural Report. OFFICERS OF STATE FAIR DIRECTORY. President—W. A. Dallmeyer, Jefferson City. Vice-President—E. E. Swink, Farmington. Secretary—John T. Stinson, Sedalia. Treasurer—W. W. Barrett, Sedalia. STATE VETERINARIAN AND DEPUTIES. Name. City or town. County. D. F. Luckey, State Veterinarian....... Coltimbias sec. eee os boone: FS Sita AMA Ve Leta esta seris, Metaeg aia She tanec ete ee JoplinkesnGeee ae bis eremiae Jasper. BilackesS antes acess epee sich sie eeteseeet ea! Chillicothe. ssc see ee Livingston. Bradley spllora cena cnnemast otk, acvoere cranes ° WhndSorertice-sotm sotiae ee Henry. GAlme ng sult ensr sci cetaiserucr ance apc oies Memphissaas i emaeiaa eae Scotland. [Byetonniit, ILjgel Dl Setanta amination hy hear eee Eval tone eee irene Caldwell. Cahill ha Mie 224 South Seventh street.St.. Joseph. .2+)-aseee e 2: Buchanan. atta crew Gio A clement sehen verona weaves Susu ligcoinsvailleneseacie sree ae Lafayette. GheathammGa ey oot Casa ens acl oene Clinton eee as eee ec Henry. GhenowethpalewW. orcs. aadee. see aires Albany. = casa aera ent ce Gentry. (Gissel RRR orp. eek ery eo eesee eee te: Perryville..... .. Perry. (ON eaves. ise Cope mea BU Ro ING vad alc Rates och scans Vernon. (Glinerm Rees a eer tet eae cer oks cae Lamar .. Barton. (COmedal bi Nea Dee etcictaee sare eraiose lara akaioraedic as Fedinas ey tra ren eeseitcnet hs Knox. CnitesMD ANE ea sie cic teal Sa PaN Caer Jackson... 0-2-6 ee ee Capen Girancdeane Gillisomaiames sae eas se erties Charlestonneae eres Mississippi. IDYenyits, [Bio Chk oe ea aan Reem anon eee Laren 8 Garrolltont tase ene Carroll. IDYovavsy aS Ah Cos as ete vane pment Ome eerie ae Boonvilliceeen eee Cooper. I Dikerernl VOR Sie, Ife NY Ue aot che Seaiete mace acters one SchelliGity2... 5.5 en ennone ES OMUSHM|(OSteteyets Arata reac eoscsye eee Ronae OsBalloniie eee aoe St. Charles. Del seo nMleEe faeces ara al ceteris Rlattel City ace moeeneee late: (Goniine sae Camilo pa eke deers cies awe A Siemens ae GChilhoweess space Johnson. (Georcere AN iseee tw Ache ve eis oct nanerdls come dccemorte Manrrisonvalleseaasi era: Cass. Glover Awl Rath week au cackace Yaris seein INIGWAIE Roo desea caecen dole abl NM, Grevonyapl wile et ecu eat A kad St Charlessess eee een Sen eharles: GrigcbyemlccuuleS eee teyese wcr seer ea oe eee Souisianatenoe aie eae Pike. Pelenr clsy rabies ies series Ja) cee. cues teen oy oh Re Niethersong Gitye eee Cole. InI@ASl Nl seinegers lela Oe nals ata Saiyan Coen alaeNobtOG 4 meee So ookomOe Caldwell. lHIOOl, Ooms INoteocasccdcs cave aacoc > oe BIMNAMEPooco0co seo eon 55 CHGhWall LOUSEIAMVN Sitesi sais chloe: toh ade Garthralee acen era eer are cree Jasper FAUT MLE SHA) Cums tact oueene eines ared onan haeimer ern ee Grundy. amres ElyidevNics ws ci ace oss ee iol ClCOMe cee , . (CASS. VietinaVesas WaNe, NIN Ano Neem testa ewe fel eataps meeenatts aintig ete Cameronincheciswasee eee Clinton. Niohnstonspheliercg eee eres en Oe eee Excelsion Springsmrrseeie ee Clay. Kinsley, A.f., 1336 East Fifteenth St... Kansas City: 72... -2...)--: Jackson. ashi nO) SAU) es tree ane enue ade iieeh espe Sos Mioberlyisviy: neice se Randolph. Me eachin Ge bees eo ites eect eee cap ee INE WARING os og bao oG.on oo OfOe Nodaway. Bebe yiGom Vr vatien 6 clrs cation itech von acer PCC ag cocogeupcwuce va celucmidbinl, ThESEST WER Sin eticre tora dth. bce oe aeaent 0 o-c eo AOL NELLY RNR Ee nee Harrison. Xa; op OR, VANS] Meccoecveslncses crctaat oer okons mc: eae Sedailiatemre «pero ees 6 Pettis. Won Cheeses ces ee eee cs. ee Springitel dart ciactscterserks + = Greene. IUSIAGV Coy Reb cots Coc RUE Ro A) ohn 6.5 cna ae IMkeacamit IAM, ce eas ooo como Cass. Wilke Cronin ll Tole weet o bdic n SHS ene Independence anise ae ace Jackson. List of Officers. IMIG roy: ;a [holism mekieis 6 5ese uuers oc Peers ore Grants Gityeeerane eerie ee Ontle MicintynresiGeon Wisden asco oes INVexI coment tgs ence Aa Audrain. NIC even -Mltg tltana teeter cha sian: ne Warnrensb ince meta Seine Johnson. McDonald Vins ARReM ani ee. a ee ke IA dinich): eae s eed eos, 2 Polk. Miaiélancl acne eytis a smoistehiene ss aera tices (eaRlataveee ee eicev ins scene Macon. Mein tira eA Ee is eg eet a oeehayaice Ne nator Peniym caer dio ae. Mee oalls: AVI Stems alles. he eeeeeeectac ee ones ee oats Galitormiase eee eee Vloniteaulr IM loyaeaiiny, | BBS Bieeee utes 5.0 caste! ene is cantare apoicnste ING OSH OMG ws ee Cer snr Newton. Mini rinedyB:.) «4 aapennge case hos ose ees Summits eae Jackson. IN itrsarpe Nea | og peter accuse ame aie aie Eavyiettenn ines cho neat ton Howard. Milos, OM os oosebesadegeeaascae KWahokarivapry a2 ochre: Clark. INIGS NAA pie a ns be aT gL Rt ne a Kanksyvillene ee a eee A Calis OMB rien ein eee Nese Acie tins lolayararloeNl, 5 aac Somaeeboooce Marion. OldMC@landeni a wees aera ele ee bos Maldentereeess nee Dunkin: FRAT ICC TSAN Ae cope RE lc chests ns ca By uine caer ea seer te hak coe St. Louis. IRarGiment etem Glee mar arnt ste, <.cieie Coloma igi Sew keen ceva a oes Sullivan. RGA COC kaa bien Hee, coment einai wees vcr tat: eatiichcaxe arecc Ranl oa to cere ee Atchison. FACATSOM a ASM NVA Ake eis sess eS sc puta ones iercelGity “enone Aone leawience. fEpitstermicvnie Ges ER. settee a paces teusees oreo) sels oS Mount Vernon...........- Lawrence. Prieinoe in, JANET Rts 5 boaods racemes Stylo oc RON Ashes 8 Rien cn ct sn aie ree ers. 2 Lincoln. OA Ce pIRe Me he Ailirs Sirat Dh caliente Shelbinaw..ja22 4 ae. ere hie Shelby. Raley Am PEVVRR Oper r oemn oe ere Vie lite City was Ackman: ¢5 eo NVATTeM: Resse me Niet. 4h, erste tie tc: sere anes Wiestulelains ann eene ae Howell. LST GENET COLE 5h] elegy AWE Seen citer Spare Nee eue ete Gaeta Maysvillem poem aoe. oan Dekalb: SCO GIN etre os otal ante, a) one kk Princetons. ee ae Mercer. Srooreres MC IN Ay Ue Re rd Mount City eee eae Holt. SIG ONY. 1 6 lee, | fhe ed eee ee nn RE Aen ea? arminetonese crise cle St. Francois. SCID Lepm MONS no tis eevee acs, streets eines PoplacBluthaneereen rere oe Butler. Slitlcl estan Nee aS ee ee ere os Mere ree Dearborn eee Platte. SVanS Sey (Coa ae ei ees on aurea asc Plattsburgs neice ee son: Clinton. STAT Aye lic Re NER i. sea Rar oe aN Richmond eee eee Ray. Syonllesy7 ollts aM Daath aiceeineeests Besta eececrse:- Iibenty seater ae ers Clay. Strate (Ge ID Re Sere aie eee is eae ann Kockwoodhaee eee Dade. Smith eStamley reise L kerey ses skeeca et: Golumbiavree ts tesa nee Boone. Sorber, W. C., 3535 N. Grand avenue. . . .St. Louis city. SHES TT yTNG [gah ee Re ec eg Ca Odessab ui esh. ter ey erat Lafayette. SUA OSCAT a als cil aie gas Osea cele: Ranisiesiy meine miaerrn tee Monroe. iptonmlthosy Bee ie. hens cian sen cere FUMING atc abst Wis ere Bates. Site aay ayn CeO of oc tee te ee mae ft eM ANIC OM eyo ea is Rk Naa 2 Lewis. siroxele De Vitse ante: eh artim: IG SE Wyant cei rere Harrison. Mitr elaine Geen yok hee ea etek ine Miogrisyll enamel sere el Ol ke Witla ples Cetra |S Meta ro techy pane Rrenitonh seh ets Ate are ee Grundy. Wenn JNainieiion JBo Uh Ga ebb been oho ge ox Brooktiel dane aster eres Linn. AYA arccl Pow Ealick GE A pee fie RR HEA al a BRE Fulton) waste Ce race Callaway. Niel clea neg. 2 ic. 0a tnt eeiae Mion a ween ane Miairs halls eistsees 2s lentes Saline. Nil Sore mlRael ree A eee a eee ee a BOLIVAR sheet Polk. VV SDLUS SMES She ata a erento. een fe eet Sed alice spa a nbs: alae newman sag Pettis. \OVAW@ a oS ERA Biel Rea eS an RRS eR toe CE Savannahs erent ern Crewe WAGER AAR 2 eet ee ene ae Oe SIMIVE US ee ey we ee ee Linn. OOGS ale. Tit Nadler tigen MA Ne bg eae hase Fumes vill eae ee a eae Randolph. Wired ai( | [eg Le eon ath OP rene rc SER L Sallasbimy) ee ee ee Chariton. On ASSOCIATE ORGANIZATIONS. MISSOURI CORN GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION. President—H. G. Windsor, Boonville. bs Secretary-Treasurer—C. B. Hutchison, Columbia. Assistant Secretary-Treasurer—F. L. Bentley, Columbia. District Vice-President—W. C. Hutchison, Jamesport. District Vice-President—A. White, Jr., Palmyra. District Vice-President—E. L. Hughes, Glasgow. District Vice-President—Simon Baumgartner, Pierce City. District Vice-President—Maurice McCauley, Doniphan. MISSOURI FARM MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION. President—J. Ed. Hall, Lamonte. Vice-President—Ollie Davis, Wellsville. Secretary-Treasurer—R. S. Besse, Columbia. Advisory Board—D. H. Doane, Columbia; F. B. Mumford, Columbia; W. P. Dysart, Columbia. MISSOURI CATTLE, SWINE AND SHEEP FEEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. President—Dr. A. W. Nelson, Bunceton. First Vice-President—C. E. Yancey, Liberty. Second Vice-President—G. V. Sneed, Sedalia. Secretary-Treasurer—H. O. Allison, Columbia. MISSOURI WOMEN FARMERS’ CLUB. President—Miss Pearle Mitchell, Columbia. Vice-President—Mrs. Rosa Russell Ingles, Columbia. Secretary-Treasurer—Mrs. Maud Griffith Woods, Harrisonville. MISSOURI HOME MAKERS’ CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION President—Miss Alice Kinney, New Franklin. First Vice-President—Mrs. J. Ed Hall, Lamonte. Second Vice-President—Miss Louise Stanley, Columbia. Secretary (Corresponding)—Miss Bab Bell, Columbia. Secretary (Recording)—Miss Pearle Mitchell, Rocheport, Treasurer—Mrs. Cora_Chapin, Appleton City. (6) | Associate Organizations. MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND DISTRICT FAIR MANAGERS. President—A. R. McComas, Sturgeon. Vice-President—J. W. McDermott, Kahoka. Treasurer—B. E. Hatton, Columbia. Secretary—E. A. Trowbridge, Columbia. MISSOURI STATE DAIRY ASSOCIATION. President— Marshall Gordon, Columbia. First Vice-President—C. W. Kent, Kansas City. Second Vice-President—O. O. Harlan, Marionville. Treasurer—Rudolph Miller, Macon. Secretary—P. M. Brandt, Columbia. MISSOURI DRAFT HORSE BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. President—J. F. Roelofson, Maryville. Vice-President—Wilbur Mcllroy, Louisiana. Secretary-Treasurer—E. A. Trowbridge, Columbia. MISSOURI SADDLE HORSE BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. President—Jas. Houchin, Jefferson City. Vice-President—E. A. Trowbridge, Columbia. Secretary—Rufus Jackson, Mexico. Treasurer—E. S. Stewart, Sturgeon. MISSOURI COUNTRY LIFE CONFERENCE. President—Paul Culver, Gower. Vice-President—H. E. Books, Fulton. Secretary—W. L. Nelson, Columbia. Treasurer—M. F. Miller, Columbia. MISSOURI SHEEP BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. President—E. B. Wilson, Stanberry. Vice-President—Lyle Atkins, Denton. Vice-President—W. D. Ashburn, Farmington. Vice-President—J. M. Grigsby, Paris. Vice-President—W. J. Shores, Clark. Secretary-Treasurer—H. Hackedorn, Columbia. MISSOURI DUROC-JERSEY BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. President—Green McFarland, Sedalia. Vice-President—Chas. L. Taylor, Olean. Secretary—R. L. Hill, Columbia. Treasurer—Geo. E. Thomson, Columbia. Directors—C. G. Starr, Centralia; Edward Sheley, New Bloomfield; A. White, | Jr., Palmyra. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. State Board of Agriculture, Office cf the Secretary, ( Columbia, Mo., March 18, 1914. f To Honorable Elliott W. Major, Governor of Missouri: Sir—I have the honor to transmit to you a report of the State Board of Agriculture for the year 1913, including the work of the State Veterinarian, State Dairy Commissioner and State Apiary Inspector. Very truly yours, JEWELL MAYES, Secretary. (8) TABLE OF CONTENTS. Miscellaneous— ° Pazes Oa dene fase Nom GUltti Chetan mits aie.) 5 se oeaceethers Ue Sie ois «ae rience ie oes E13 Annual Meeting— MimTteS! = sane OG MANO ORE CNRS 0-2. oe ORES. CEMENTS cea ee 14-21 GP Ontet Oia SCC AIAyg esate arp nor aM Rewer etal oR oe oe clk Maen cen es 22-27, Seercianyrs lhingimerall, Suevemiett. couscotiacwe boow deecesos ooo ug 66 oF 27-43 “TDRERUSUT OPES TE SFOYON GENES aon A eR nei oie GRIP OEE ar am, ee eee ae 44-40 ReportmotestatemVieteninarianesheldonmaane ssa acer eine nei. 47-53 Report OF Stawe Wenermeinein ILGC E76 0coboccoobade:,coseosagoueud 54-61 INepore Or IDA? (COmmMISHOINCG yoo nko ooooopodoone obo Ds oonGdO GU OE 61-65 FVEPORtMOleNPIany, eLMSPECtOter mame ier lca sectors encloses teats 65-67 Farmers’ Week— Reponisseeaperssainds Nd diesSese seme scenes: oats cleus chistes 68-622 Miscellaneous— IMBISSOUEL Tey: SSyorsniee J etbinah AIMS oak Gets 8 Oe Aol cada ep g Sites Bern ote 623-627 Shorthorn Brings’ $38/083)imi the Atrgentine..........0......65+.-- 627-628 loOwatOmVicasunemamiialll@onimememta rms a a ciicieiceeaeieniee irene s 628-630 leiview Stocks Mianketsmhote nse dialOla sc 4 ree nec os bocce cee oan 630-635 Cov Majors: GoodmxoadseDaysmm ats. 2s Jc sere err een: 636-647 Mbiggouint (Cinaypy IRGRE GY AGE MUOIBS oe n.s goa doosgue ood oMaDEaobmod culoboobae 648-671 IMS SO tiaineliviegaS tO Camere eset To a oa eects ol GA Ssea wad oe ewe am ana eee 672-679 ILISE Oi AICS IMbiggowint STAe Menge andecdesucudonoe shes scons sonoae se 680-706 EPOLEEOke StatemVicteninanianmandmD epiitless: ses see a eaatrecin ne eerie 707-722 Line Suogs Slayonneimis ineomm Whole gs5goceacabun one boo san aeboeoouce 723-724 Live Swoele Siaijoyonemi shale) IWNGQOuI: gen apneoo sancbo wen ouacocouamon se 724-725 ISG ES icone cos Cero ere tay Gla lca fy SHG chy ES ok omen ae PS Pe 725 y bial a ' om wo } ‘ - 1) we : a . @ Pie fui 5 j 1 P a y. Tous v ‘ a : > ' , di iy 4 a F r i hari Ayer eee wee The Missouri State Board of Agriculture. NEW MEMBERS AND OFFICERS. In the forty-fourth annual report of this Board brief sketches of the corporate and ex officio members and of the various offi- cers and employes were given. Last year sketches of the new members of the Board were published. Following that plan and in order that the people may know more of those who serve them as members or officers of the Board, something con- cerning the new members, officers and employes is given this year. Jewell Mayes (Democrat), Secretary of the Missouri State Board of Agriculture.—Born on February 15, 1873, at the Mayes farm near Knoxville, Ray county, Missouri, son of Wiley "i MayesieJir.,. sand Sina Stephenson Mayes. His grand- fat heer, » Wiley Mayes, Sr., came from Tennessee and settled in Knoxville town- ship in 1829. His mother’s people came from Ken- tucky. »to ‘Clay, county in) 1615. His father died in L830; pandas the widow lives with the subject of this sketch, her only son. On August 10, 1904, he mar- ried Miss Edith Frances Martin, daughter of John JEWELL MAYES, Secretary. and Stella Mar- (11) 12 Missourt Agricultural Report. tin, and granddaughter of Rev. O. D. Allen of Kansas City. They have one son, Martin, a lad in his ninth year. Owns the Mayes farm in Ray county, a portion of which has been in the family for the third generation. Is publisher of the Richmond (Mo.) Missourian, and since 1898 has been a writer on farm hfe subjects, and in 1912 was publicity secretary of the Missouri Anti-Single Tax League and is now state secretary of that organization. Christopher Hilke, Eleventh district (Democrat), 1515 Bremen avenue, St. Louis.—Born in Westphalia, Germany, October 7, 1850. Came to Missouri September 28, 1865. Was educated in the parochial schools of Westphalia. Was married May 2, 1876, his wife being Miss Margaret Wiegmann. They have four daughters and two sons. Mr. Hilke is a member of the Catholic Church. He was appointed a member of the State Board of Agriculture July 17, 1913. Isa promi- nent hay and grain merchant of St. Louis. J. J. Wakefield, Ninth district (Democrat), Mexico, R. F. D. No. 2.—Born in Brooke county, West Virginia, November 10, 1863, but has resided in Audrain county, Missouri, since March 2, 1866. Was educated in the schools of this county. Was mar- ried in 1897, his wife being Miss Laura F. McCue. They have one child. Mr. Wakefield was appointed a member of the State Board of Agriculture in July, 1913. He served as highway engineer fe of Audrain county from January, 1908, if A to January, 1911. He has always taken an active interest in road and school work in his home district. He is en- gaged in general farming, including the breeding and feeding of live stock. He is also an extensive grower of corn, taking much interest in improved corn. Part of the farm now owned by Mr. Wakefield was settled by his father in 1868. Christopher Hilke. J. J. Wakefield. New Members Board of Agriculture. 13 Mack V. Thralls, Sixth district (Democrat), Urich.—Born in Linn county, Kansas, September 11, 1868. Came to Missouri in 1874, and resided in St. Clair county, near Apple- ton City, until 1893. Was educated in the public schools and the Appleton City Academy. Was married in 1896, his wife being Miss Cora Miller. They have two children, a daughter and a son. Mr. Thralls was for twenty years editor of the Urich Herald. He wasa -member of the Forty-fourth General Assembly of the State of Missouri, Mack V. Thralls. representing Henry county. For twenty years he was clerk of the public school board of Urich and for fifteen years clerk of the city of Urich. He has always taken a prominent part in lodge and church work. Isa member of the Baptist church and has served as moderator of the Febo Baptist Association. Was in charge of the Henry county agricultural exhibit at the Missouri State Fair in 1911 and 1912 and had been appointed to same position for 1913, but resigned when appointed member of the Board of Agricul- ture and when he was named as director in charge of agricul- tural hall. Since retiring from active newspaper work he has devoted his time to supervising his farm. Eugene G. Bennett, State Dairy Commissioner, Carthage, Mo.—Was born August 12, 1868, at Coving- ton, Ky. Came to Missouri in 1874. Was educated in the public and private schools at Carthage. Was married September 1, 1903, to Miss Bertha EK. Fancher... Appointed to present position, im August, 1913." > Has yior a number of years been connected with the dairy industry of the State. | E. G. Bennett. Annual Meeting. MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS. State Board of Agriculture, Office of the Secretary, } Columbia, Mo., January 12, 1914. The Board met in the office of the Secretary at 4 p. m. with President Lewis in the chair. Those present were: Messrs. Wilkinson, Hilke, Brayton, Bellows, Mumford, Evans, Newlon, Parker, Wakefield, Hedrick, Duncan, Swink, Thralls, Dallmeyer, Lewis, Nelson, Gentry and Barnes. Absent, Gover- nor Major. The minutes of meeting in St. Louis November 12, 1913, were read and, on motion of Judge Swink, were approved. The President appointed Mr. Hilke, Mr. Wakefield and Mr. Hedrick as the Auditing Committee to examine the financial reports of the Secretary and Treasurer. The Secretary then read his report of the work done by the Board and a few recommendations for the future. On motion of Mr. Brayton and Mr. Thralls, the report was received and ordered printed in the annual report. Mr. E. G. Bennett, State Dairy Commissioner, then read his report and, on motion of Dean Mumford, the report was received and ordered printed in the annual report. Dr. Luckey, State Veterinarian, presented his list of deputies and, on motion by Judge Swink, supported by Mr. Wakefield, the list was approved and the Secretary directed to issue com- missions for the same. The report of Dr. Sheldon for the first eight months of the year was read by Dr. Luckey, and after much discussion and the consideration of several propositions it was ordered that the President appoint a committee of three, including chairman, to examine Dr. Sheldon’s report and to advise what part, if any, should be left out of the annual report. The committee was composed of Mr. Duncan, Judge Wilkinson and President Lewis, and on advice of the committee the report was received and, after eliminating certain words that were considered objectionable, was ordered printed in the annual report. (14) Annual Meeting. 15 Dr. Luckey then read his report of work done in his depart- ment after September 1, 1913, and, on motion of Mr. Thralls and Mr. Newlon, the report was received and ordered printed in the annual report. On invitation of the Board, Dr. McAllister of Columbia, Dr. McComas of Sturgeon, Dr. Goodwin, secretary of the Mis- souri State Medical Society, and Dr. G. O. Cuppaidge of the State Board of Health appeared before the Board to advocate the erection of a medical building on the fair grounds at Sedalia, Mo., where lectures can be given during fair week to instruct the people in hygiene and preservation of health. On motion of Mr. Barnes and Mr. Brayton, permission was given the State Veterinarian to reduce his salaried force when a reduction of expenditures in the veterinary department becomes necessary. BEECTION OF OFFICERS. The chairman called for nominations for the office of President of the Board for the current year. On motion of Mr. Thralls, the rules were suspended and the Secretary was instructed to cast the ballots for Mr. P. P. Lewis for President. On motion of Mr. Gentry, the rules were suspended and Judge Wilkinson was elected Vice-President. For the office of Secretary Mr. Duncan nominated Mr. | Jewell Mayes and, on motion of Mr. Newlon, the rules were suspended and Mr. Mayes was elected Secretary, to take effect February 1, 1914. On motion of Mr. Gentry, the rules were suspended and Mr. W. L. Nelson was elected Assistant Secretary. On motion of Mr. A. T. Nelson, the rules were suspended and Mr. Bright elected Treasurer. On motion of Mr. Gentry, supported by Mr. Thralls, the chair was authorized to appoint a committee to escort the newly elected Secretary, Mr. Mayes, to the room. Messrs. Wilson, Duncan and Bellows were named as the committee. On motion of Mr. Barnes and Mr. Thralls, the chairman was authorized to appoint a legislative committee of five mem- bers (to be appointed later). Adjourned to 2:30 p. m. January 13, 1914, 16 Missourt Agricultural Report. MINUTES OF ADJOURNED MEETING Secretary’s Office, Columbia, Mo. \ January 13, 1914, 2:30 o’clock p. m. f Board met in office of Secretary according to adjournment, and in the absence of President Lewis the Vice-President, W. R. Wilkinson, took the chair. The Secretary-elect, Mr. Mayes, was escorted to the room by the committee and was introducéd to the Board by Mr. Duncan, and made a few remarks expressing his appreciation of the honor conferred on him and of the magnitude of the work before him. : Miss Bab Bell, women’s institute lecturer for the Board, made a brief report of her work and urged co-operation with the home economics department of the University. On motion of Mr. Dallmeyer, Miss Bell was authorized to co-operate with the University through its department of home economics. On motion the secretary was authorized to expend $75.00 out of the Farmers’ Institute fund to purchase equipment needed to demonstrate the possibilities in the teaching of home economics in the rural schools. Mr. Mayes asked for the opinion of the Board on the exten- sion work for women, and the Board informally expressed an approval. On motion of Mr. Bellows, Mr. W. L. Nelson was author- ized to prepare a series of bulletins giving the history of the lead- ing breeds of live stock in Missouri. Mr. G. W. Reavis made a brief statement on the Boys’ State Fair School and asked that his report be published. Mr. J. K. Wright and several members expressed approval of the boys’ school. On motion duly made and carried, the Governor’s procla- mation governing the movement and quarantine of cattle in McDonald, Newton, Ripley and Oregon counties be annulled. On motion of Mr. A. T. Nelson, it was ordered that a com- mittee composed of Mr. Mayes, Mr. W. L. Nelson, Dean Mum- ford and Mr. Wright be authorized to purchase the equipment necessary to give stereopticon shows at Farmers’ Institutes. The committee on the Agricultural College then made the following report which, on motion of Mr. Newlon, supported by Mr. Barnes, was approved and ordered printed in the annual report: Minutes of Adjourned Meeting. 17 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE. The Revised Statutes of Missouri, section 601, require that a committee of the Board of Agriculture shall annually make an inspection of the work and progress of the College of Agriculture and the Experiment Station of the University of Missouri, and report its findings to this Board. Acting in accordance with this statutory requirement, your committee begs leave to submit the following report. In submitting this report we have attempted to give definite facts and figures as far as possible which mark the progress of this institution. In general, your committee desires to record its opinion that the College of Agriculture is mak- ing rapid progress in all lines of activity coming within the scope of its organization. The enrollment of students has rapidly increased, the investigations conducted by the Experi- ment Station are practical, and the extension activities conducted by the college which have for their purpose the bringing of results of the college directly to the farmer, all have been augmented and more completely and systematically organized during the past year: ENROLLMENT OF STUDENTS.—tThe enrollment in the College of Agriculture has increased from 147 in 1903-04 to 821 during the year 1913-14. During the past five years the enrollment in the College of Agriculture has increased 350 per cent. The enrollment in the long course in 1903-04 was 75. In 1913-14 the enrollment is 506. The short course enrollment in 1903-04 was 72. The enrollment in the short course in 1913-14 is 315. We find that from the years 1901 to 1906 the enrollment increased from 160 to 186, and that from 1907 the increase has been from 211 to 820 at the present time. Special courses are offered by the College of Agriculture for the preparation of teachers for the rural schools, for the training of dairymen, for poultry farmers, and a short course for women in home economics. ADDITIONS TO EQUIPMENT AND INCREASE IN THE TEACHING FORCE—During the past year the building for agricultural chemistry has been completed and equipped, and students in the College of Agriculture are now receiving instruction in this building. The physics building has also been completed and is fully equipped for instruction in that subject. A greenhouse for the department of agronomy, to be used in soil and plant experiments, has greatly added to the efficiency of instruction and investiga- tion in that department. Extensive repairs have been made on the dairy building. Labora- tories for the study of animal nutrition have been provided in the new building for agricul- tural chemistry. Instruction is now offered in the cutting and curing of meats. The fol- lowing live stock has been added to the department of animal husbandry: By purchase— One Percheron stallion, one saddle filly, one high grade draft horse, twenty-eight pure bred Dorset, Southdown, Hampshire, Shropshire, and Cotswold sheep, four pure bred Duroc- Jersey and Poland China swine, thirty-nine head of cattle for instructional and investiga- tional purposes. There have been produced on the farm the following animals: Four fillies, seventy-five pure bred sheep, one hundred and sixty-five pure bred hogs, fifty-five pure bred cattle. The following additions have been made to the teaching force in the University and College of Agriculture: Agronomy, one assistant; entomology, one assistant; farm manage- ment, two assistants; poultry husbandry, one assistant; veterinary science, one assistant; rural economics, one assistant professor. ACHIEVEMENTS OF AGRICULTURAL STUDENTS.—We point with pride to the fact that in 1913 the dairy judging team of the University of Missouri won first place in competition with sixteen institutions representing the various agricultural colleges in the United States. Mr. W. A. Rhea, a Missouri student, won first and a four hundred dollar scholarship; and Mr. L. W. Wing, Jr., another Missouri man, won second and also a four hundred dollar scholarship. These prizes were won in competition with forty-eight other students representing the best agricultural colleges in the United States. The fruit judging team competing in the National Fruit Judging Contest at Washington, D. C., won first place and brought back to Missouri a beautiful silver cup. The live stock judging team at the International Live Stock Show at Chicago won second place in competition with twelve other teams representing the agricultural colleges of America. No more convincing testi- mony could be offered to the efficiency of the instruction given in the Missouri College of Agriculture than that represented by the winnings of Missouri men in national and inter- national competitions. FAT CATTLE PRIZES WON BY THE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE.— The department of animal husbandry fed and exhibited fourteen head of fat cattle at the Missouri State Fair, the American Royal, and the International Live Stock Shows. Several of these cattle were bred by the College of Agriculture. At the Missouri State Fair every animal exhibited won a first prize. At the three shows the cattle exhibited by the University of Missouri won the following prizes: One grand championship, five championships, twenty- five first prizes, eight secomd prizes, nine third prizes, eight fourth prizes, one fifth prize, one sixth prize. Prizes were also won on fat barrows which were exhibited for the first time in 1913. 18 Missourt Agricultural Report. EXTENSION TEACHING. We find that the college has more and more emphasized the importance of carrying directly to the farmers the results of important and practical investigations made by the Experiment Station. A brief statement regarding these outside activities is indicated in the following paragraphs: Branch Short Courses in Agriculture.—Since the report of the Agricultural College Com- mittee one year ago, the College of Agriculture has conducted eleven branch short courses, each one five days in length. The total attendance in these short courses was 862, and the average daily attendance at each short course was 47. Farmers’ Institutes—The college has for many years co-operated with the Secretary of the Board of Agriculture in Farmers’ Institute work in Missouri. During the past year teachers from the College of Agriculture have attended forty Farmers’ Institutes located in thirty-three counties; 6,130 people were in attendance at these Farmers’ Institute meetings. In addition to the foregoing, men from the College of Agriculture have attended forty-nine local farmers’ meetings in twenty-four other counties of the State. There were 4,495 people in attendance upon these meetings. Special Demonstration Trains.—The College of Agriculture co-operated in conducting three special demonstration trains running through twenty Missouri counties, and thus reached directly 15,350 people. Correspondence.—The demands upon the College of Agriculture for special information upon all phases of agriculture and horticulture are increasing at a rapid rate. The number of letters received by the college has more than doubled in the past three years. In 1913, 52,407 inquiries for special information were received by the various departments of the Col- lege of Agriculture. Assistance was given to each of these inquiries either by personal replies or by sending publications of the college. Judging Live Stock at County Fairs.—During the past year the college furnished experi- enced judges to fifty-three county fairs located in forty-two Missouri counties. ‘There were 384,977 people in attendance at these live stock shows. Judging Corn Shows.—Calls for judges at corn shows have increased. During the past year judges were furnished to thirty-six local corn shows located in thirty-one counties. There were 75,500 people attending these corn shows. Boys’ Corn Growing Contests——The Boys’ Corn Growing Contests have now been defi- nitely organized in 113 Missouri counties, and there are enrolled in these contests 3,500 boys. More than 600 samples of corn were exhibited by boys during the year. The value of this work cannot be overestimated, as an abiding interest in agriculture has been created on the part of many young men. County Farm Advisers.—In accordance with provisions of the farm adviser law enacted by the Forty-seventh General Assembly, the College of Agriculture has organized twelve counties and has actually employed ten county farm advisers, who are now actively at work for the agricultural betterment of the counties in which they are located. The principle of this project is not new in the policy of the College of Agriculture. The college has been doing extension work for many years. The present plan attempts to make this extension work more efficient by locating a representative of the college in each county where the application of the practical investigations made by the Experiment Station can be made directly to the farmer himself. On an average, the farm advisers have been located in the various counties less than one year. During that time the farm advisers have visited 765 farms, attended 252 farmers’ meetings, spoken to 19,674 people, and given personal advice to 2,749 farmers. Numerous other activities have been promoted and directed by the farm advisers. This project has accomplished very great service to the farmers of Missouri. WORK IN THE EXPERIMENT STATION. The Experiment Station continues to concern itself with many practical investigations of the problems of the farmer. Some of these investigations which seem to your com- mittee to be of immediate benefit to farmers are the following: The improvement of unimproved western ewes through use of pure bred rams. Economic production of pork with forage crops. : Coutnarison of warm feed and water to cooked and uncooked feed and cold water or hogs. Best methods of preparing corn for fattening steers. Comparison of corn and oats as feed for working mules. Most profitable crop rotations for Missouri. uxperiinents with alfalfa, cowpeas, soy beans, sweet clover and other economic plants. Nutrition of heifers. A study of the life histories and methods of eradication of tarnished plant bug, apple leat hopper, hickory twig girdler, peach-tree borer and other injurious insects. 10. Herat to determine the durability of fence posts,-variously treated to resist ecay. 11. Best methods of storing seeds. 12. Farm cost accounting. BM: NICD Oe Minutes of Adjourned Meeting. 19 13. Distribution of labor on a farm. 14. The organization and administration of a profitable farm. 15. Peach breeding for hardy sorts. 16. Spraying fruits for insect and fungous diseases. 17. Experiment in orchard heating. 18. Fall versus spring planting of trees. 19. Self-fertility and self-sterility of fruits. 20. Study of tomato diseases in St. Louis county. 21. Grain smut infections and control. 22. Microorganisms in silage. Soil Survey.—In co-operation with the United States Department of Agriculture, the Experiment Station has completed a detailed soil survey of thirty-four Missouri counties. Of these five counties, Nodaway, Ralls, Perry, Dunklin and Greene were completed during the season of 1913. The soil survey forms the basis for work on the soil experiment fields. The station is now conducting soil experiments on twenty-one fields representing twenty-one soil types of the State. On some of these fields it’ has been found possible to double the yield of farm crops and increase the net profits by proper crop rotations and the addition of fer- tilizers. — Fertilizer Control.—The Experiment Station has collected fertilizers from 81 Missouri counties. Over 800 samples have been analyzed and the results published in Bulletin Num- ber 109. The work of the Experiment Station in the inspection of commercial fertilizers in this State has practically driven out of the State dishonest fertilizer dealers. The farmer who purchases his fertilizers from a reliable dealer may be assured that the fertilizer contains the fertilizing elements guaranteed by the manufacturer. The Experiment Station report indicates clearly which firms are furnishing a good grade of fertilizers and which firms are failing to supply a grade of fertilizers as good as their guarantee. We find that the agri- cultural work in several departments is seriously hampered for want of room, and suggest that the next Legislature of Missouri be memorialized to provide additional room, also addi- tional land for experimental work, if possible, within the revenues of our State. Publications.—During the year the College of Agriculture has sent out 29,500 copies of newspaper bulletins and 160,674 copies of regular bulletins. The following publications have been issued during the year: Bulletin 107—-Farm Poultry House Construction. Bulletin 108—Grass Investigations in the Ozark Upland. Bulletin 109—Inspection of Commercial Fertilizers. Bulletin 110—Forage Crop Rotations for Pork Production. Bulletin 111—Report of the Director for Year Ending June 30, 1912. Bulletin 112—Corn Silage for Fattening Two-year-old Steers. Bulletin 113—Commercial Fertilizers for Strawberries. Research Bulletin 6—The Distribution of Farm Labor. Circular 57—Keeping Records of Dairy Cows. Circular 58—The Missouri Fertilizer Law. Circular 59—The Farm Adviser Law of Missouri. Circular 60—The County Farm Adviser Plan. Circular 61—Docking and Castrating Lambs. Circular 62—The Chinch Bug and Its Control. Circular 63—Inspection Service, Control of Insect Pests and Plant Diseases. Circular 64—Directions for Testing Cream. Circular 65—Advantages from Use of the Pure Bred Ram. Circular 66—Cotton Seed Selection for Southeast Missouri. Index to Bulletins 97-104. Index to Research Bulletins 1-3. Your committee has examined the work of the various departments and notes with approval the signs of progress in all of the activities of the college. Your committee has been informed that impotent hog cholera serum has been sent out by plants in the State of Mis- souri. We recommend that all serum manufactured in the State of Missouri be tested for potency before being sent out for use by Missouri farmers. We recommend that all hog cholera serum plants located in this State be operated strictly in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Federal Bureau of Animal Industry governing the production of hog cholera serum, and that all such plants be required by law to be kept up to the federal standard in all respects. Under present arrangements, the State Veterinarian is vested with police authority, and the State Agricultural College has charge of the manufacture and distribu- tion of hog choleraserum. We further recommend that the distribution of hog cholera serum, made at the expense of the State, and all police authority necessary in the control of hog cholera be vested in one department, with a view that the State may hereafter be saved the expense of maintaining two different departments for the control of hog cholera. Respectfully submitted, E. E. Swink, E. L. Newton, Mack V, THRALLS, Committee. 20 Missourt Agricultural Report. On motion the Board of Agriculture then adjourned and immediately reconvened as a Fair Board. Board met in office of the Secretary in adjourned session with Vice-President Wilkinson in the chair. The Auditing Committee made the following report: REPORT OF THE AUDITING COMMITTEE. To the Board of Agriculture: We, the undersigned, members of the committee appointed by the President to examine the financial statement of the Secretary and Treasurer and to inspect the warrants drawn by the Executive Committee, have examined the same and find that the books of the Secretary agree with the financial statement submitted, and the same agrees with the report of the Treasurer of the Board. The following warrants which have been issued at the last annual statement, but had not been presented for payment, we find have since been paid: MONTHLY CROP REPORT. NOME O 2A a sete erdctics sos Gea asin Gis, sgoyelsks vee Nays ie ha ’S.oteaens arene amterslevahs) Ganie wen ore SeweNe $25.04 INGO MGS Olea: cucyenais csi UMMM eile (oh. ciioy eslae el Silay sxe, fou sys) cavyoparatsy shay manta else Wish ye Re egs yocia eboe Bee 10.50 IN (ORNS Cleve rete voit ctyey cecicsy east Syea sel ap « shatiis: SUT SG csyeweeheucesy ol se eye ay/A ay eeray 2 Oy ah oye chnns Sapoa ea lane 1.65 IN@> G2Seaidirerore gem obo ceo eo ARCHED Oba sen oMB Cl ct create Ore ene Casa: OMRON ch ACTS ah 5 Re ery 43.75 FARMERS’ INSTITUTE. IN[OMPLSS Sapna couse chek rou yea ens rewares a Ceureneiist beystyamer teh al oar gendn dawute Chel 4 mumubuetn sea eae eeicemts arlene $25.00 INI@, HBO sisa iota arare.6 othe oie © Ora HIG mene tai GIN SHS IN ree ts ab Re ie es eMac 200.00 INTO Mel !e3 O iterates apee casi hes eed Sarah eS (etsy a epee Eke cneeoanye Pcie cer aspenicieet nea e acu 22.25 IN[@ sr TEIO OE Stooge asenmInT Ey PLOT nen OPE RRS ELE near CC bn tees Monee bois ut Sereno peinnrte eetonteticn ota citer chy ci 13.87 INOMMUAO ORE ieputcroieyekerars atc a lactate icin otte coco eum tal operete eee ais aim’ St ansae sp antea steams amen 150.47 INOS PI TSioo st O° EeDic Dice es OTE RC ROTONORORCE ARO PALONO Cc CAC ene ie ee eR RES act cl cue e $2.64 INI@s P20) (Bis Bio.0: Bol a.o ek OA aloe Once D TetckO, OIC OTe: Rare nko co aL aie eartes o CME Ole MRM Te rh Chow tas oka ene 62.71 IN (ONE Zhao Steee st aer pepay sy wee Pet tote cus 5 ie voy orcs Lesser agereemunteyous’ pachel & uss, Srensieh chat ed aniemen ee seculs 194.91 The following warrants, for which corresponding vouchers are on file with the Secretary, have not been presented to the treasurer for payment: DISTRIBUTION OF ANNUAL REPORT. INO). Ao delete one acerca lia Op ators Loree PAD on centeirte bio thc sca-ciiecr Aenecho cae cut tae tah Dadi cement | $1.50 INO A715 Deanne See cha inne cea ee Sein nae fa 21 A EL CS VE ee Bhi IT) Core Pe a $44.41 INIGK: (CTO ES chair cmtecieh fae rated cae Rea ee 3K.) an ny cha are a 21.15 INOS” LIZA LARS Sot oeeken tions nh Sareea E CIES at MEER MRR Sha ee. Bots uh OLS cen ade oh nen toad | $4.28 INTO) S UC aasorterd Oa loko cto are YC mBIER A ee rear Sie iota 4a holt nue sda eee ane Mean eteraaic es ca bea) BUC ss d'aroarciet th oe oNau bad ehchpsaeete Ria aan Clevo AR GROIN eet eee aes Pe Ae Pe at am | 7.50 When these warrants have been presented to and paid by the Treasurer there will be an exact agreement in balances. Respectfully submitted, J. J. WAKEFIELD, Curist HILKe, T. J. Heprick. Committee. On motion duly made and carried, the report was approved and committee discharged. Mr. Newlon presented the following .for the consideration of the Board: As our Secretary has asked this Board to give some recogni- tion to the improvement of the dog family in Missouri, I move that the State Board of Agriculture most heartily approve the recommendation of the Secretary, and at least lend its influence to the improvement of the breeds of dogs most beneficial to the farmers of Missouri. The motion was duly seconded and unanimously carried. Mr. Thralls presented the following: Be it resolved by the Missouri State Board of Agriculture, That in’ the retirement of Honorable T. C. Wilson as Secretary of this Board we shall miss him, and hereby tender him our fullest thanks for his able, efficient and untiring service in behalf of and for the promotion of all details of the work of this Board in all its departments. On motion the resolution was adopted by unanimous vote. On motion it was ordered that the Secretary of the Fair Board furnish to the Secretary of the Board of Agriculture a list of those winning prizes at the State Fair in 1913 for live stock exhibits, said list to be printed in the annual report. On motion the meeting adjourned sine dic. ve Missourt Agricultural Report. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY. To the Honorable Members of the Board of Agriculture: This is the fourth annual meeting of the Board during my administration of the office of Secretary, and it is doubt- less appropriate that I give a brief statement showing some of the work accomplished. The affairs of the office had been ably and conscien- tiously administered by my predecessor, and I found a well organized, effective force doing most excellent work. My purpose from the be- ginning ~- was ‘to: “make ame changes except for betterment of the service, and I have ad- hered strictly to that policy. In every department and dur- ing all of my administration I have had the most cordial and loyal support of each and every ‘employe, and this often when the service was but poorly paid. My first effort was to ascertain where improvement could be made without increase of expenditure, and I may give a few instances. T. C. Wilson, Retiring Secretary. RECORDS AND FILES COMPLETED. To my surprise I found the office did not have a complete set of the annual reports of this Board. Eight volumes were missing from our office set and I went to work immediately to secure the missing volumes. This I found much more difficult than I supposed. I appealed to county clerks, libraries and individuals, and after persistent and determined effort during three years I have completed the set, securing the last volume some six months ago. The monthly bulletins issued by the Board were growing more and more valuable, and I gathered up some of the rare ones and had them bound and added to our Report of Secretary. 23 collection, until we now have a complete set of 10 volumes, and the eleventh will soon be added, making the set complete to 1914. MAILING LIST GREATLY INCREASED. A hasty inspection of our mailing list showed many names of those who had changed residence or had died, and I deter- mined to make the list a live one. Our efforts in this work soon cut the list of 3,500 to less than 3,000 names. By enlisting the aid of the farmer himself and making our bulletins more practi- cal than technical, they became more and more popular and the demand for them caused a rapid growth in our list, until today we have a list very near the 10,000 mark and practically all receiving our publications. 15,495,000 PAGES OF PRINTED MATTER. Our monthly bulletins were being printed in lots of from 2,000 to 8,000 copies, and some of these were not much in de- mand. We now find it generally necessary to print 12,000 copies, and then some issues are exhausted long before the demand has been satisfied. We dare not print more copies, for the funds allowed us by the Legislature will not permit. During the year 1913 the following publications were issued from this office: Vol. 11, No. 1, January—The County Farm Adviser and County Bureau of Agricul- ture, 46 pages, 10,000 copies. Vol. 11, No. 2, February—Methods of Fattening, Dressing and Marketing Poultry, 32 pages, 12,000 copies. Vol. 11, No. 3, March—Missouri Home Makers’ Association, 1913, 130 pages, 3,000 copies. Vol. 11, No. 4, April—Pastures for Hogs, 39 pages, 12,000 copies. Vol. 11, No. 5, May—Agricultural Laws in Missouri, 35 pages, 12,000 copies. Vol. 11, No. 6, June—Country Hams and Bacon, 53 pages, 12,000 copies. Vol. 11, No. 7, July—Blue Grass in Missouri, 40 pages, 12,000 copies. Vol. 11, No. 8, August—Peach Growing in Missouri (Koshkonong-Brandsville dis- trict), 28 pages, 12,000 copies. Vol. 11, No. 9, September—Silo Facts from Missouri Farmers, 108 pages, 15,000 copies. Vol 11, No. 10, October—Missouri Saddle Horse, 95 pages, 12,000 copies. Vol. 11, No. 11, November—Development of Home Economics Work in Missouri, 23 pages, 12,000 copies. Vol. 11, No. 12, December—Missouri Crop Review for 1913, 23 pages, 12,000 copies. Annual report, 658 pages, 12,500 copies. Booklet, ‘‘Missouri Peaches,’’ 32 pages, 12,000 copies. This makes a total of 15,495,000 pages of printed literature in 1913, not including the monthly crop report. AUTHORITATIVE CROP REPORTS. Our crop reports, made up from estimates supplied by more than 600 correspondents representing the 114 counties of the State, are issued during the months of April, May, June, July, 24 Missouri Agricultural Report. August, September and October. In October a wheat and live stock report is issued and in December a general report covering all the principal field crops. These reports are much in demand and are generally regarded as among the most authoritative issued by any state. 240 FARMERS’ INSTITUTES, 53,612 ATTENDANCE. The Farmers’ Institute is a very important part of the Board’s work, and the interest has grown materially. We now have two lecturers employed by the year and both are doing most excellent work. Their hearts and their lives are given up to their calling, and both have resisted tempting offers of greater salaries elsewhere because of this fact. Mr. Wright has been with us long enough that the Board members are familiar with the character of his work. Miss Bell has been in our service less than a year, but her work is applauded by State officers, county school superintendents, county farm advisers, and above all, by oe BS [ Nopawar” wor f male Prous aint Bl lz o e 30 10) Ve) aay Scruru I GENTRY SULLIVAN -— + MERCER CLARK HARRISON iz es 3 Lewis I ada ale || | ADAIR eH eo e [cerns rar oruNoy | ey SS | See \ EO eoee f ~ | ece | SHELBY | MARION \\~ es DAVIESS + ‘ G4 ! '@e@ee\\ =| i ance ayia cee: ; MONROE ee oe a iguetee LAFAYCTTE , e e ee: oes¢ | ” els ; { COOPER “5 VORNSON nT errs | eee leee ie 50 | ; ae 7 e©ee | ee 19@e@e@ MONITEAU a ( @ee: ro) [es in HENRY Oe Se e per BENTON [ie 3 : i | % els a a 5 fe a 5 a VEFFERSON e | j Ee eo mares" cooose ps ~ le e af] ex ear MILLER + | e * HIGKORY + — i VERNON | i Pivasni] “PHELPS (ee foacsy A k ie WASHINGTON | © hi = CEDAR 1 poi 4 { ee 7 i ad ee | lie ates i oer (ON a one [ am > ee a = ave 1 | ail bit Sara ° 4 pes EBSTE WRIGHT Oe GREENE eo:c@e | OD Eawanh el eel ce, @ e . a fe [rien {| je eo! e | e e t Fa 4 NEWTON + Soe ee es len reat ise STONE ’ ' 4 zs ae . 4 e a ——.—_| me [| tzarn : RIPLEY M*DONALO ‘ ° ! | | Keine soe | | lmcse the people everywhere she has appeared. The work Miss Bell is presenting to the people is new to the great majority and it is often difficult to get a hearing at first, but in every instance Report of Secretary. 25 where an audience has been secured, through curiosity or other- wise, she has aroused great interest, and in many cases a per- manent organization has been effected promising much for the future. Since she has been with the Board she has addressed 78 meetings composed of 3,776 people and organized 23 active working home makers’ clubs: In Dade county, 4; Dent, 1; Jackson, 5; Buchanan, 5; Montgomery, 1; Cape Girardeau, 1; rlarmison. 2: Ghariton, 1; Lafayette; 1, and Pike, 1. Since beginning of this institute year we have held 240 institutes in 77 counties, with a total attendance of 53,612. ECONOMY IN CONDUCTING WORK. I might as well give some comparisons of our work with that done in other states. We have an appropriation of $17,500 for the Farmers’ Institute fund for the years 1913 and 1914. Assuming that every dollar is spent in the institute work alone, we would have $8,750 for the calendar year. The United States reports of institute work in all the states for the fiscal year ending July 1, 1913, shows for Missouri 314 days of institute work, and allowing the full half of our biennial appropriation for this work alone, our work costs $27.86 per day. The same report shows for Kansas an average of $39.91; Iowa, $155.19; Illinois, $85.39; Kentucky, $119.32; Nebraska, $55.12. Michigan stands lowest at $15.25. ; This comparison does not tell all the truth, for we do not spend $8,750 on the institutes. When we deduct the money spent for Farmers’ Week, for prizes given to encourage corn growing, meat curing, dairying, tomato growing, etc., as well as the expenses of speakers for the Farmers’ Week, we reduce the $27.86 daily cost of the institute work to near one-half, and this should be done to give a fair comparison with results in other states. While the demand for the help afforded by our insti- tutes has not fallen off, the appropriations by our recent Legis- lature for this work was reduced $5,000, as compared to that of the previous session, by leaving out the appropriation for the - extension course. HIGHWAY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT ABOLISHED. The Highway Engineer’s Department was abolished by the recent Legislature and that work transferred to the Highway Commissioner. 26 Missourt Agricultural Report. MONEY NEEDED FOR APIARY WORK. The apiary work has not progressed during this four-year term because of the lack of funds. The protection of the bee industry and the increase in production of honey is of great importance to the State, and this Board can well afford to use their utmost power to secure much larger appropriations for this fund to enable the Apiary Inspector to employ assistants enough to drive the foul brood and other enemies of the bee out of the State and keep it out. The appropriation, now $2,000, should be at least $5,000 for the biennial period. THE VETERINARY DEPARTMENT. The Forty-sixth General Assembly increased the allowance for this work from $23,200 to $25,000 for the two-year period. Long before the end of 1912 it was apparent that the funds would not carry on the work, and the Governor gave this Board authority to continue the needed work and make a deficiency demand on the next session. This was done and a deficiency account of $2,634.51 was reported to the appropriation com- mittee of the House and of the Senate, and every member of each committee was supplied with the information. For some reason best known to the House Committee, no appropria- tion was made to pay this deficiency, although a similar over- expenditure in the Highway Engineer’s fund was provided for and paid. The work of the State Veterinarian and his deputies has increased enormously in Missouri during the last four years, which increase is largely due to the prevalence of tuberculosis and hog cholera. This Board very wisely asked our last Legis- lature for an appropriation of $50,000 to run the veterinary department for the years 1913 and 1914, but a short-sighted Legislature authorized only half that amount, and it will be absolutely necessary to exceed this allowance and create another deficiency or let the people suffer the terrible ravages of tuber- culosis, glanders and other diseases until another Legislature can relieve the dangerous situation. In Dr. Luckey you have a man by nature and temperament most admirably equipped to carry on the work. To this may be added the great value of his years of experience both in the office of State Veterinarian and in private practice. The only need is in the support this Board can and ought to give him. Pressure can and should be applied in our next General Assembly to secure for this depart- Report of Secretary. PA ment not what was asked of the last assembly, but double that amount. Take a firm stand for $100,000 and give Dr. Luckey your combined support and the money can be secured that will enable your State Veterinarian not only to drive out bovine tuberculosis, thereby reducing the death rate by consumption one-half, but will also enable him to control the hog cholera situation in Missouri. It is not necessary for me to tell you gentlemen what this means. This briefly covers the expenditures of the funds appor- tioned to your use. IN CONCLUSION. In closing my official connection with the Board I feel it my duty to call attention to some serious conditions. If this Board is to continue its great work in the interest of agriculture, it must assert itself and stand up for its rights. The time has passed when the individual or a collection of individuals can long exist and accomplish anything worth while without a struggle. One after another of your prerogatives are being sought and some have been taken over by other interests. If you quietly permit this to continue the time will soon come when a Board of Agriculture will not be needed in Missourt and your existence will end. TiC] WiEsSONn, ‘Secretary. SECRETARY S FINANCIAL STATEMENT. To the Board of Agriculture: I beg to submit the following exhibit of the financial trans- actions of the Board for the year beginning January 11, 1913, and ending January 12, 1914, which shows the balances on hand at the beginning of the year, the requisitions drawn on State Auditor, warrants drawn on W. A. Bright, Treasurer of the Board, balances in the treasury of the Board, and the balances in the different funds remaining in the State Treasury: 28 Missourt Agricultural Report. DISTRIBUTION OF ANNUAL REPORTS. Date. Name. War. No. Dr. Cri 19138 Jan balance, sonaehian dss soca sleds ns sok eeeleee mel eal ete $337.40 Feb 8 | Bye Ay MRM ere orcnes crslacusnepcia sities | DAD |: icpest os cea $50.00 a 8 Wells, Fargo & Company, express..... 243). “ill. . 2° eae 100.00 Casal 23 Transfer Companyeeee eee CASH eal Ser cee cea 5 5.25 sae weil M., K. & T. Railway Company...... G2; gma eo teekedensy secon 15.12 aryl Herald-Statesman Publishing Co. ... | UOSu Val she ere tecdes ee 45.00 me a5 eeINCOINTTGCCH eG EES Sit ia cre dS ce AE GAL. | all cess ies eenisire erode 36.05 AN al Mee Ovovierdpattn ses See cee osc ae eee | ar pene 106.73 AO RETH ISS A orearicd ead S eeHID vem cheacoeciions ei taycto class! ai Bis $1,458.21 $1,458.21 EXPENSE OF MEMBERS. | Date. Name. War. No. Dr. Cr 1913. Janes ee oOnbalanceronsnandrec 4m neue eee leieeeeer ence $168.06 SE SIGART BIN iN veel Bry G9) 011 CN Aaa ee a O38, . jl aereicds, ots $8.77 A Hee Ne WwLO MES, 5 Aecis os: cick coe clan ee OS OM iaal iia Bie Concha ety sae 24.65 coe v4 Hee ING WLOM ees ess. y's reroseecernren ene QA OM AM ettiasittcoses one Loo : 14 ee eM CONIC Kot ra APS Sint ievous aie vs slonee ee ee Q4aTey Vesey eto 3 eee 150 “14 William P. Evans G42 Vaile tes atte 3.90 ela JohnwRarkertmy racials ee eee oe Eo el caer cg ait oy co 23.20 DT: APETV HINGIS OME eee teee olor eters. ciavateneie resides (OP I Ie ec. cleans Fh. 5) 5 46.00 14 Hae VEIN SON ete ou4c eya cise suelescntie ere 945.1 ais mew eee: steer 31.05 PATO U1 ole be HORPECUMISUIOM ae ses aie Roiricen sch sane Oech tell Paoke eee 300.00 JTS PAT WB ee BS Ale 1B Eero lic (ol Feta ae, lea av an ene Un ee G46) > eee occa 20.84 steer rl. POMP ALK OR rpestehs nus Alay soya nie. onew esate DATEL) Me et arte Sys eee 18.50 eal 1 Dis. J Siete heb en RR cas ena AU APES andy uae i a 94'S) Wer eae Fee 22.92 Atte L FEC DUNCAN Riek Ree canon QAGi ay ae ares 20.29 eg eI | Re IN@ wiloney ser ae, tents ahah ousianees 950) & ihe Sakae 26.44 yo Dill Ae EGING ISON rt fic econo tric peau eT eis (V5) [ema emewete nts Hibs aa ck 26.60 Gort NT ING PES (Gienttnyaesact keer aida ia siencrne OH Dig | |eecienieis tea yen teee 7.38 seal Coe MEMBarN Sitar hey prt soo aeiaveiegrceokare O5She 3|sinitacbsontrnore 34.24 NDT e284 OLPOCUISIEION eerie huais Se Oe oe ete oer 100.00 Mayen lb velredmlomNVininsOnere rine aan ee Q5 aig | aeti ela ateres 11.40 or 9 Wi. LR iWilkcinsona ain. csi cctonaeaomeiors GOs i lee eatsintee ae ks 48.00 : 9 JOHNYEP Ankers as ee eee ek kee 956. oe Miedaieiakls Sais 12.60 a 9 Cie MB ClOWS cc nos 6 oh or ee Oe ET tse re etene ENR 18.35 "a 9 EB oe WV TRE ear Nhs os, os ocy 8 ae a QBS ih 4] si sdedais Baie ians 23.00 or 9 AvaTyMINICISOM trices case uly teri ae Rie OS OM aH Sevsnetahathe aust 31.10 “e 9 Charles@Houscholder... onan inne GO Wilizreiite A ewuevenshe 35.70 Report of Secretary. EXPENSE OF MEMBERS—(Continued.) 3) Date Name. War. No. | Dr. Cr. 1913 | May 9 1915 1 INIEV AOINGS dogo od donion ooo no olee OG10) Cilia ea ceaecieuae | $31.34 eS 9 FAO DUNCAN ees ate sures eet, occa OX SAl ls ay atanteeae epee 14.32 a 9 Fred T. Munson. DOS Me ete ccatrn Cay Ae 17.00 ot 9 F. B. Mumford. OE Ra, aN eS otros 7.02 2 9 FT OL MVVALS OM areca. tei sech tye shts/ ono sacaesoner ts G5 tel lbaasir ache 7.02 A: 9 Wise Ae AIMeE VOR ee aoa. ee oes jee OGG Blaine ante: 9.58 es 9 INASEIEMG OTT yam tret een isie esos ites ees ects 9 Or aoe Teak chat ke 4.25 ss 9 CAMReBanmeshis en a too cen conse ieee QGSF Pisce cutee teen: 36.88 ue 9 PP IG CWAS EIS, cot cats. saci aera SOXG YS Jaa Wine Rr ne ee pe Pree 69.80 ve 9 A eye) s bs 1B YEN OI, ao Wome aad CMR are te: A's mre C7 ORS Groteeesiney ator 25.06 Oo (9) SW PREV ATISEP crs cc AN s cicacs Setuee te G7ileer ellen eee 10.28 ee ET OLE CG UIST ELON: pad ns cicee 2) cicise ca: «boas een cena eubas $200.00 comin es yeeninye Suer ma CSCHiaa is...) cere Oi esheets 13.00 sees AW eld BUCS ya bate) ce tae ne at RR DS ee OS whew Alora serene Gm enee 17.28 Bil @harles#Householder.. >... ...5--426-- Dag A nrein scrsmomersiians | 26.35 ITC we Ol pe ORFEQLUISTOLOME rac, Sisiever eye cles ci oc ate eee Ie a ayeusta one 100.00 | UVa OM POP QULSUULOM tect cew-ae ee ciccs sl cc. Sean lope seee sa ae et 200.00 PAC ean ea Es Vane © SMV AUIS OM craters. «assis, a arc cache Rael Dre lace aca nohexers os | 15.59 ue 4 INAH GCM bn yates snort nl oc ste 976 Dyer ic catettaiene eens | 5.22 sa SZ er Seed Cheney s: 2 Sjakailehees se 977 fo ee 9 15.20 aie 4 laleibay ishibowoneyeals 5 ans oo oneeeoccon 6 DESK Taverne ee aon ieee 8.50 “s 4 AWS ECM LHI SOM «5 cusiehs IGG ieaa Ss ak 9.60 8X0) E. A. Trowbridge. . TG Gyn YN eens a ree ele 4.55 oO Missouri Valley Guide Compas. ape GGG gl Pease pens sce 2.00 Ss) HSpArwRvemle vacances NG GZ 0 NVR eee gee 75.00 ~~ 8X0) DNTAN ONE RAO CRG CROs eu Rte REE Ma tee MGOGS aerate ands 148.98 = Sho) WiaryavViacrinag Seller sir eee ry NGG OER ese ty 5 ee 20.04 BN) Ae 1 Gey Whee A iS T8 OR Hanes tach Sane Mi AER GOW wan cent eee 221.86 July 10 DW itl INCISOME eA uses neeots tare neon sires | TRG 7Aab al ath eee ene er eS ee fe BD «98 ec Cuwilsone ee iat: Ke Aastra: a ea 22.53 oe eds} eR IKelliva Wari oats ies eee tact thc TRG tel CPR ie ere | Dil Dealt 3/28 Macrina sibel ramets c-1: eG Amn eine hoes, ite 123.44 ep t28 IWeMIn. INGISOM wanes | cays =o Bee 1 55 DD © Wil SOmM so. Aaa Alsen cos ole ces tees TOSI ileesl aces eee 30) ely AWarl GG) geeks tc ar act coe pee Kats Pregl feerctenarecn ole co = 30 BigP SOO tairace settee sn scat eee ee E1683): loans eee 2) GX0) ASS DW ORTA Ma xteren: eee oie cee Ged aad woke aaa WG6S84-. lis hte met) Dr. Walter McNab Miller........... V685 sci. sak eee 8X0) Columbia Telephone Company....... NG6S6i, |i See ~~ 8X0) J. H. Guitar postmaster... . seen ere UG Site els tae eee OUP aa4 0) Maxey IDI See ouaogeobnponeuauoo HOSS ets. Rt ee te 8X0) 1 tbs] Brpgpel DBI Vs ai aeaee Pec cy Ne Re: Param ae Na T6895, llc tst Ne eee Sept. 10 Hy VASE TOW DIG ee eeycestr oe cic caes ees aie NGE9OM) ih. 3 Se See rr 10 MacrinayB Clk cae. oles oclcrotaiet ones 169M: iles.ldewilehewe pam 4 || OsPeGUiSiGlOmMm s.r... eet cc. Mex oa sey cliniee cndille cleanin | $350.00 10) OYE NS lee dig LEGA \iiiated Min, obo waowledoo 0 con « NGO QE chen ios eee fy e829 IWWis DE IMIGIKC OME ME Ren cine s wore ita creases 1GOS J ultnayeas co cherenae » | 29 IMacrinay elle cee ees WG945 |e pase) ctnsenee eet29 Wells, Fargo & Company, express... . GOSS il, Sees sie e ae Oct 8 Columbia Telephone Company....... VO 96d |e etka eee & 8 E. W. Stephens Publishing Company . MOOT Wi lexiet ett ce eee i 8 Herald-Statesman Publishing Co...... MG OSG. oes saxty eee * 8 ao se L Oe heenecdnaes sho eucseet aes eae GOO) eee Bote se ie ee WG Herald-Statesman Publishing Co...... WOO! Ml age tee Ne palicd Hy VVALS OT earetr bs eerie, ain: Eva eyen: TEGO i egeete ee eee See ie OFFOOUMISIELON ey ecc-percicic reeset ese oc tois et nalts io eeheaasiioust 200.00 “* 31 | By Columbia Telephone Company....... LOD" ear een Oe Bail SOUL OW Arp eee sens Skee ite nis cchropenseec. LOS" 5). Neen eee ee Si Rei SeWiISON cosheks Sica cee oe 1704; \loheine ee, eee ee “BB JeIOl ly SW ING Se stares, heya ecrere eocteee LOS) GA cheno oe Het Sl BAe Ay SINOO Ulin teem ere tena) crereroicns noe LPO Gio cata ds Pe Sul Ba bab elles ee kare tar atiette aus ete bitiaceun LO en set ener eee ee Bil (Oe LUO OI eee Coghcrd BeeMecats ath beeaT otek POS" ss) ck he. See] seeresyI George mwilliam Sree ae siete casters TE OD) registers -soees ote Nov. 13 M., K. & T. Railway Company...... DLZAILOVT slate akeech Bee BA eds hal) meals} Business System Store.............. TAU ey Seon err aa TMOG, rt? oe > 1B} Rego CHa delsonmone ta). tsichetospsiee eee TIN 7aTD eS ay Shh A 8 es SOR | we TB} ThesDouglasssStudion 1.1 ree ee 5 Li les a eae cd ER a mel CEB Hutchison sso bees TEGAN. a a rae seeps ats} PR HD OUSLASSs ates tes = OLS PAG I UZAT US ae (ey vie 1183 MIO AMVWVGLS OT repr eneeer ate nein Cae ape LZ AT SHE \Brefeh yc eacen ike es ros P13 Wala ss INCISONMnnihia ee rereaie sic eters ene AL ZOLITo ead spay ten, Skee cease) 4 Je Melly Wright. seks se ceo ee Te 4 LS hae aot e e an ee soe. 1 yaed ety 1a QdKOKS) Ode, 4 5 Gey sdia oto 5 .croros 6 ONO LPO Rae aes Wy ree ce Be eee 4: Amer. Assc. Farmers’ Inst. Workers. . 20) Wisc een Ge we od: DME Cll et is eysve tor nelcnasttons coeehore Eicon eats THON A Peete fH estan to cic nw -24 (Gi, 1B, LEHONKI HOM, ook edocodsedaoghe M2) lll Aaatnmatce. SN eae an A Ee liar KempsterAnweae. photehonim tea M2 See ily ws oak ee oe. OD NAae Je ON (Nos DP AA RE AVR EGOS cai DAS IEPA has tes Scere Sem yi! OS POQUISIULOMs sect arcnevabsraunsc. deen ewetersens oe renal Rieter ces, Seal 1,000.00 Dec on ByoBePASMOOt: |. 5 ae oceanic oes leer PC2Z5™ Wee tees ile Soe 3 5 Cari WoyWihitek. tee As aan LA2OC MIS akas oe See i 5 Jeo Guitar postmaster erate PPA | lecieo tenes ni che Oe B o 5 E. W. Stephens Publishing Company . INS ay Iievoyerskera sccksre tne fs 5 Webs Niel somes rs as oe oe eee ae 1772) ited ches ORL S 5 Ee wiempstery sis. cc, crore SOMME ee cee Se bee Oe aa SOM: 27 bus haere cas reach ee ee T1733) VR een onset oy tot ty 20) Jere Guitar postmaster... o5 lian I/O bers Geo amehe as 2 cot DO +l in OREO CUELSUDLOTNG oo arte Casi corcetncten ty S nls: oY Reece teal | Cee eee 2,500.00 enn 9a! BS yadwkcel ly War Sn beaaes. 14 Le ye a eae EGS Bie tlle Mesos veh at eases oe) 15 Oh ALi ged Ssh aa CMe) Ae SRA Cokes sis. Sing DSA: Wile sid Suen oncveas trees .00 54 -00 .80 .35 .12 .44 .00 . 66 65 .00 .80 .00 .44 saul . 20 56 47 -06 .40 -50 -50 .00 .50 34 55 .00 .15 -92 72 95 54 12 . 84 .00 74 .00 .48 09) af) 78 -21 06 -00 C6 . 64 .20 .29 72 .52 -00 .00 . 84 ST -03 . 00 55 .28 Report of Secretary. FARMERS INSTITUTE—(Continued.) By) Date. Name. War. No. Dr. Cr. 1913. Dec. 29 CHB outchisonee as cee eee ore As DEGAS Foyer ewok toe eee errs $14.54 “529 CORA MVC DSCCD eres srcreg on tpeieas oo eke ieee Mi Ged Oia hoe Sgt crt col tous 6.48 ceo. FS COM PStOE cinerea reels is eed DU CAS37 AM, || een Pa eae Dents Seo IBabyBellerc mks toes caves cian SS ee ck eae ee ae 221.00 er 48) ISNA SO NG ag ooo oo Re Ooo Go © ISIE ee ae Aon so aes 9.44 ve 29 Wabash Railroad Company...... 7A Ole Gl epee aeuaea te eka 1.19 epee O MIOISEHKMN GIS eV erreiyrersea | acini hierar 10/28 Da eae ag Sa ecu Cae 44.41 Eoin 29 Katherine Pricer atesicys anes oe iene: WADE sen bate steeve si eusie 21.15 29 BPA STNOOtR Meee he hanes U4 Br iy (eeces tas ales 213.95 wy t29 SMES JOLrdantaycrino one cio oa achat GAAS al yrs cae): costeneeen aie 24.04 S29 © WALSON cree ye eeeks kc ie cuca ee A Siem |ssecctntwemenctesces 13.84 we Sait Western Union Telegraph Company. . WAGs Se Ware cote ec 2.35. Jan. A2 BLANCO ern cee enieeay cet seve ice 2 a) heey eee) | Henn aecotraanayel llores ei aem avec 1,321.99 NOU AIS hate welte tin vcaione eee eer a oleae $11,006.73 $11,006.73 x OFFICE EXPENSE. Date. Name. War. No. Dr. Cr. 1913. ane lel (Pe lLOD Alan COrOMPlHan Ge secu) c.a-3 2 ae ila oe eee ell asco enone: $.02 AND rile ee Ose CUASIGLOM ey. ae et porctig cesier hs ers eevee een al ieeeees eee 125.00 ss 9 | By University Co-operative Store........ SOD we alienate: $20.35 o 9 Newman Hardware Company........ SOG rae escaocae ore 6.35 op 9 E. W. Stephens Publishing Company.|...897 |..........-.. 10.70 a 9 The Statesman Publishing Company. . SOSer ile cee eee 45.50 May 1 J. W. Butler.Paper Company........ SOOM Nite oro saree tao te 1 Jy] Esa] DAVE Res pean tee eR Re DOO | see ocarcs ws ck: 24.00 Mg 8 J. W. Butler Paper Company........ DONTE Bl iece arena sos 32.30 eee (28 |b ORC OQUISL tL OM reat rensucyansdes oho: 2.3.5 aioe, Se evelc oa aeons 100.00 “31 | By Statesman Publishing Company...... GOD estes suysaceer eta. IS 75s ee enl Pe OVP eh ee gitaten a A Sioa sec rcs cee SOSH) tater chess tee 12.00 oF Sil University Co-operative Store........|.. 904 |............ 20.90 UMM S ON NOMeQUISiOLONe maria to ecko cre es Sys shell eae 125.00 “30 | By J. W. Butler Paper Company........ FO 0 F552 fala | Peace bat ate atk ee 16.75 rs O) Libby & Williams Paper Company... SOG ee aoeae acieens 24.01 SC) Hye erp ULO Wa hars seers, edith cvorcians eteicun nde DOT Ne eit eyecare a 12.00 FB Y0) Sears, Roebuck & Company......... GOST I reece re acasr ushte he 3.40 = BY) Wabash Railroad Company.......... DOO Bl ee cite Ais wit csgsc ac: 1.67 July 7 J. W. Butler Paper Company........ DO mre etches asp a 2 10.75 ES Ole Li OFLFOCUISIOION cece aiencysweser hire cose) fae Nokes, | (remptec obeeee 100.00 “31 | By Sears, Roebuck & Company......... .2)3 LT. lala ee teenth ee eee 8.00 Aug. 30 L. C. Smith & Bros. Typewriter Co. ON 2 en Crepe een 7.00 sa, 530 JigaWei COMERS. Geer eas oe shin cares CO) 5a MIT Ra ane a 8.00 Oct. 8 University Co-operative Store........ ON Alaa tS chev ae 7.00 Nov. 13 Libby & Williams Paper Company... CLES Sh speech ee 8.60 poe alp} J. W. Butler Paper Company........ ONG Rees ones cantor es 15.25 ae 2) | LVORrCCULISL DION era sear peeaee en ates s, citeiroc set aren kctooal ca ae eure 150.00 Dec. 5 | By Business System Store.............. (On 17h ahi aetna a iA 75.00 & 5 Hee DULG year taecceionere cis cade olhte tne QUIS Melee ar isco er nai eee 12.00 Saeko): University Co-operative Store........ OUD esi eshecea cutest 4.10 oo Syl Tbh I Dp DUE NIE bso cc CI Eine 8 Rs PR marae RUS OZ OR ites nicest: 12.00 31 Business System Store.............. PAT 9 | Rei cal ests ia cee 75.00 Janey 12 LEXA TeV eas 5 ercue saceclacl eles toto ome Memon citer clic hes a esac ca Ieieeee c e eal 6.29 ER OUAIS EY are ge teie et sicoe ey slers Mince all ode eee: $600.02 $600.02 to 36 Missouri Agricultural Report. EXTENSION COURSE IN AGRICULTURE. Date. Name. War. No. Dr. Cr. 1913. Janie pe holbalanceion hand eee cieoc oc eee =< $478.44 sree 4s HB yaNellosNesbittiic. ac. oc accies Oot ene 2D 6 We see eeaeeeene $131.48 Mar. 7 INelleUINGSbitthemenemecttonn. aise i De ene Pereiirires 1 23- olG 152.45 May 8 INGLIGUINGS DIRS: eros cide ocbioc ear $24.° Ne eee 100.00 oe 8 Hie A ROMUC Yeni pennies vacaciones M25 Wiss bess eas eee 94.51 PRO UAIS Herter ace. a icbensihn lene ekeiOe hte ets aloes $478.44 $478.44 STATE VETERINARY FUND. Date. Name. War. No. Dr. Cr. 1913. arrieeeel el el) SES Vasc OVOLOLALG Gm cheese ers are eisai ce eee oO eRe woes toll ones or ape $1,668.24 ras ee RB eeUOVCs. ciecsonsvcrstene Colom cia ene 2955 Ol etaccxa.a Beemer 23735 oom allyl 12 ELOBA ET Cols ecm emarn GubaAan Gros nae PES co OMonEeeS 2956 |.. das te see 216.20 vie 3b aD BO Wile rahe crores eicso steak >Ao 15 Gand Peta eeeiiaicrsro. otc 154.01 Ss: ScaSheld oneness ep ve eee els 2958) Was eee 192.50 sel’: Wer Bakcirtleys niet ces aries helenae fies 2959 lWeexoico dee eee 51.53 oo IW de NOOLe ee easy aa Geocaches ZOCOR cies Oe cos renee 85.49 a4: IAG ATI CK ae travasnshd cet eonieichies cen cana ce 296k ns chee 223,31 “14 AWiem ©) 2S OLDER Amrik. tskave oe enteaiorneconon te 2962 Ae ep aceon 10.00 saa He SODAUS WM ster the ie ciekelieis ks oeeene 2963) Oi\crsscrercearstennen 9.22 Leaps | PAR IKANSIO Yeah acces ch eEa ee orcas ZOE Sarctovctintone cone VORGa Mar. 21 Wialterol cINeiligecss ao: ec ctirn oie ances 2965. cl asc ciensre ease 5.00 se 2 ID yl de bleh an we eathoro las iodo Ono ee MER 2966) {Cece nsenino 16.64 eae Al 1D BEN ergo lai a cat eo oaneons oar arEeEs aR erneCrs Z9OGT she wissen ene 6.00 Se er: Hey sebaughaes.. 29GS8ie tl accaes ee nee 9.41 eA A eT KATISIOY 5 cy tetas, one GW yo aloe cieiocey esd 296O Eres, veces 9.56 2 ORI ERS WAT Ge Arete tenon ctctetatolsus 2 eaieiarewee ZOOM Reicicscnte ee 228.05 Sel 16 es Oa Lt ol aa eae aero ae Oe AT) fa lal | eres epi ae in bE 219.30 eee si | EDS BLOW sects else ec ekereee se lelws PA! 7 (An ee ice aici 165.52 ee ay WiC LD avAGdSONaneceieet cee tees 2978 Vile hh gs arcuate 1.50 ' 21 HWE OUBTiOnyes ce icts ke esis Gren rarer OTE isc = oops 1 aes 8.80 er OSI JaNahd Bs CGAY) (eh lc eee ans PH ate eee ee ZO TS I y Weteveuseo.sxeus auetae 40.70 SPH AWie HS CLI yises oy etre rinicletere moka oe OA (eal Rome aioe comala cS 11.00 : Py Wire bs WRADtlO yess is ere wclione eke ce 2977 Canceled. HO OA J.C. Humphreys QOS ollevotrerscucet octet. 21.60 so ADI 8D Browaly ace ceca ote ee nae DOF OE Gas eye ac cree 155.36 Je Pal Sasheldonse sneer cece enr eens cece 2980) 9 ill tsi, 5 sieve ceeters 217.73 eee: EDC ANVALG a rratyasne hc eres cata cis hearse DOSE Bl ovek- a, ceanceene 274.29 ¥ eol Ee DUCKS sata avo ee ease one eee O15: DH PR eae eee temtcec: G 256.38 APA Stesheldoneee seria: PLC OLR RTI DOB ais sccuses scent vekences 182.29 Aprilia |. LO req isi tions 5 omic orn erence een eo $3,000.00 ae DaiABY: Seo SNeld OMG nis Actes rors Ortee sai oes orto PO BAN Pra te ae nee 191.09 F 9 Statesman Publishing Company...... 2OSOe dlhiskaeiet cies 33.75 . 9 SWira bs IRGIPtG yikes ak cachecetne cieee eusers DOSG Pa erayels eee 151.51 * 9 LDS Brows sce ec one ee ZOSTUF Alnevaoretes cuenee 182.21 fe 9 Wells, Fargo & Company...... ISS 5 Vso axa, otelcee Aas 11.87 of 9 153 Feel OFM B16) Seer raenoimeleremrtcnl cae ones Sipecic eo, 8 t 2989" le ccerac cays Ad tote 236.60 a 9 13 RC OFA (1 a6 Re oreeentiod eCeres PRORSIGRC Arri'ol.c.0 ONE 2990 aca actoreteencee 240.45 a 9 Underwood Typewriter Company.... ZOOM ccc cis ahokno 08 68.00 os 9 E. W. Stephens Publishing Company . OO WE servants sere suseeweus 37.50 . 9 J. W. Butler Paper Company........ 2993 Transf'd to office Exp. ee 9 CHD Ana ccc aye -uen Srayctel dane ee OAM era stoices cnt e 143.95 4 9 Western Union Telegraph Company. . 99 Sie alisutareraious carcie es 2.03 im 9 AW. Ce SOL DOR crayetre kaso) () RB uOVilrmy Neeser ssh cmencionelo sisuan nai nee OCA S ill\eresoketersieit betoge 23.38 oO) He Be iVviuimt ord traci sioseoditene oe SOMO «| Sucroucdore ne wiCeene 6.88 oF BYD) Tes Gisi@larks- aie. yess pte ah cpt OOAGmedleuciotiore suctetiae 20.53 ~~ aX) E. W. Stephens Publishing Company. SOM a ssecuenene bs eee 8.50 “30 Willm. Cooper & Nephews.......... SO CS |\ sicessrer cee 12.00 i | 30) Je CH OIG Kerem ats cisteerer accra teccrete a SOUDY Whevens aseue. srvcee sor 7.09 me 8X0) Western Union Telegraph Company. . SOSO. | rvccsusyssnsete nots 4.10 es BO) OWLS OMEy hyecewsinaena theme cic reco agree SOSMRN | cccgonueriaewsacnone 17.62 es 8X0) LSID BLO Wal ensminycherereernae maior cece at BOSZi ||leyeectes sey oeeyentes 227.91 Sept. 10 1a ie (GIES Libis) Saas SSI OR ERE Cy pect Honea Coe SOS" iil aarxcocnewec mee 279.40 a ea (0) PES RL OMC Sen ee ko da cicuetone mitict incre Iscnn ate BOSE, | Riatyeieuisesneute 10.00 eed 0) Dig IMIG a ISAKS7S aw Oo nee os be A bare Oken SO85) «Iho cise eae we ces 9.00 eS Ae OVE OUMISLULOMy parrots) pete accuse Acacia clllomene iN oieaneer 1,000.00 ee 4 ES VD eH eG UT CLOW asec alt-weyas cuievtetere hey veer ohe laren skebs BOSGH Aleicsnceaeeuevencuck: 196.20 oe PAS) SWiEGHS ee GIN GLO jevanctgstotecrsie cornu chars eurieuens GOST aM Alcs hese Gd sD) ANT am ESCLINS LO Via ays sscter esa oar eatyseinehe SOSSr hiesveneac. tsi 7.50 BOs ote) PPpH rail 2 OL Viera aecise tee oo set BOSD iliteaaeaete cae near 5.88 29) IAB a WETS NG ceccspsiees oltgaae apse tee awe SOOO il soasaerttonas rene 50.00 Lee 4o) Wit © ES OVDOR es cect acucbscccheio emusic SOOM a Sewscwexate ol maar: 5.00 re 42) Sahel onesie tscerens posescctocs eareaceusie tea tneveme SOO 2 mya ciiianicaore cnr 210.74 aa O) WE Oe SOLDODG sictate pega retilen dekoctors wienoonc SO9S ae | eispciencas ore 2.50 Oct 8 Win © SOLDER Tg sleushe los bot ade oie em concer ae SO94W Nera reracis case 5.00 rs 8 TL UE) BLOWIN fysleya oko ebac lenses iedeucneacesictele SOO Sie eesrce tone yanecae 219.55 ar 8 13 (GAC O)5a4t bai cd Poet ees Ce ae pape ae as au Peres SOD G A eatnrcnsrade payers 257.00 a 8 UMmiversityaof VlissOurite eres 3 9 Can use sweyecccners cise Was S 8 LPC SAWIALGI Arachne ese lohe tr sac teen: SOO SM rineecseie sas agare 236.43 = 8 1 Week Greek OW EV eh Gene ncinin aeoterd Sey once cist SOOO tehvas tenses corer 12.45 ss 8 AW iA wR ALOR scigceas ekceteluateucueian tie ouatens SOOM eae cascpencetae 22.95 of 8 HAW. COMBS Toner. gatos Conia oat ee cee ne SLOW y Meee Weceanss. dese oe 45.00 “i 8 dig Lele (Endo) daa ee eas Bisiniola otoioe aoead G31 0P4 oiliseaameaenon cata toca 75.00 ar PANG} Columbia Telephone Company....... Shil(08 Weel euonseetcrcicentter 1.50 EDA. €l|| COMPO QUISIGION yysre tr cys cat arctouclle larcelere usuanty-|| Rene eee aT 1,500.00 mers tha ES ye es CKO rtm cuca). ee ak casein cel eure SEICOY We ecoeateey creme cee ete 210.71 on Bal BAB WALLE IG Serelor.tece aie firmed SMOS aa eocvene saa cen 50.00 oo BU Western Union Telegraph Company. . SMOG Wal Mitek s eastctake 2.14 parol E. W. Stephens Publishing Company. SHO we illgte ols eee cee od 7.50 eo Bl CE Dananr sfc Wena On a ee SOS cepett pees xeas i vemers 4.80 Bil NG OV ans 7 sy has fe oe is Oko Oe SILOS! Pillow niece ais, ae 16.66 vo Bil TEAS Cy UCL Sop rence ais) ic toeace oxo AEE UIC OVE. J |Bkn ek essencrcnonaicrs 237.32 Nov. 13 Aaa MISTI SIONS 0 are van sisi lsc Goch el eee oe STMT BTCA oes, cee acre Gar 5.00 ES} Wi SOL DOI aie oe rote oieCaece ca tn ne eine SZ Canceled. Report of Secretary. 39 STATE VETERINARY FUND—(Continued.) Date. Name. War. No. Dr. Cr. 1913. Nov. 13 EU CMG iar Ger cpa karte ea ouch e331 hs Taal Oke Cages Gn cad ne $51.15 els Hime JOhNSOne hee enters enn oy Ee a Nee Liars, gs nee aimed 47.00 = ale; Wises WaWiel Chis simpate er ees ee eons A SEL Sak Wl eves Ar wats e 0 2 10.00 at? SERIES 1a Clare hee eeee nate ae pee epee. ciao SSAEIGIS hose ote tomes 5 tere 8.00 aes, Wid CCLQIE AOD Dis weivanenee ce ta ener alc co LL? Alia le oct GL atten DRE 85.10 * 13 Wisk © S OGDOL at ieee athe et ee mae ate SUS ilexntacts stare ets.2 12.95 Me ets lbgpoatin ID, IRON pis Bic ie oto oto an o ono SOM, Were reso oe 212.60 Ue 13 EAR AVVO Tia gee oeeyen ete cen Peek) ot ro) (5? 0 ial li hac oes eenar ICer 18.00 S27 a5} BS SWire © SBT On Roy. ce nis sess ab. sist oes SZ lie sills Ae eee cae 27.50 ae LS E. W. Stephens Publishing Company. SIF Ma ee ees 40.00 pia ls eA KERWIOOUSE Hee.) Rinesse eters oo cratacnsen ars SIE Wises clouds c | 134.29 eee? OM eMNOLPOGUISIGLOME rs cenerte unt aie chose ee atewesle ae allen ee heels $1,500.00 Dec ones yi George IWeMleber ness sere oso ey Ee Weeiraipacirit aac! 12.00 ve 5 Jamesi@ullisoneece ac. sooo eae ae SLQSt Men eee esl 7.00 < 5 ID) WHER @LIUCOS Spas hea ete dose ors cee ls eee aus SULZO erases ce eke re ele 24.00 oe is J MEN ha) VAULT aoe oie SRE SIREN ee eaaie oe SLO ae, an ees 6.50 = 5 Horact Bradley...... Bi foley Bacar ote ene Oe 5.00 at 5 DEAK VVIOOUS Sains ce! + ees on eeee were 339 PAL ST attr ony Steet ore 202.52 os 5 EB EUSS CLD Ola ranma el wa ea eee ete eran Res es ilies Ole. essnacceae eee yews 14.82 xs 5 IWialiter Je WuOpDiaircok coc Aine Stthe ave eis a be ott ae eney AREA OO tea | 24.22 ce 5 PHU CKe YA. ate ee eee DBD ina Seokecs chee 208.58 ss 5 Ese dese Naat sagt eng eto A yore a eiorcier a oree SHSSEM ichigo rina | 50.00 a 5 eR CMAN Ghost. nn ts sch ieee Cen. an SSA, Wiles Meee wy. | 271.06 vs 5 HimerJe JOHNStOne == eerie cee SSS, | lleorencus actens 125.00 ne 5 Jinan ID)s 1eigonpety ene seo babeoone aoe SUSGY Wiltanee aes 216.64 + 5 Western Union Telegraph Company. . SST haces peewee ase | 1.60 oe 5 Columbia Telephone Company....... SUS Sas Ice ee | 8.90 cc 5 American Express Company......... UTS Ho ell (Ee ee coor ose | 10.64 SD) oI) TeQUISIION sa io eters eee eee: el Pen eanrae ee oe Oe 1,000.00 | POON BOP Py Lewis: mee seh oe ete ne ee STAOtalteaern ere e| 26.65 “ 29 Asay. RUN SLO Vay eames Riterd eee tome 6 mare's 53 7 ER Se chet ical caree | Ils} 5510) i 229 AGE) GlOVEL AA eit, See erie oe nise eis ol poh he De 1 AES hae es cee 23.54 i 29 Hawi OeBrienss qaeecntaeeer rds sane ST AS eee ee er, oe 15.00 Ha Po) Herald-Statesman Company......... Bil VR ae ee ee piiedn © 18.00 = 329 Bre WTS ts tereecpes< s,< eica e oeae olor Sy alte ANS Re oe Gs 50.00 ae }9] 1 DNs shee (SB ed Seis oie i s,s ees or SWAG ihatetenotespavalthense: 222.91 Oe Sil Ibaaotin IDS Weronndle sa soosonenosancece SAT AN sccug cunenn oueenshe 178.74 oe Bul MHP ASS AVVOLT Ortay temtarsoenins ekki cre encevee LAB) | eco encnehensnewe aes 22.13 ot Sal Jim ea VWVLOOUStveecuerss. ce che ned Hee ate coy 0 | eet aon aes Saab 204.64 OO Gaul GeOreenWielseber..: en nies hee. a SD OL Bie eee rien 11.80 el Wells, Fargo & Company, express.... Gi fay ee We ceoceatonne mio dic 4.20 ee etl Columbia Telephone Company....... SLODiee |S eebocna coin 8.10 VSNL J. H. Guitar, postmaster............ SLD SM lisecereretecnen hekees 75.00 Deficiency Orel OZ map yor ecu enone ae 2,634.51 Jans 2 ES AL ATIC One eh ne, eR epee eee sii, oa oats peace neel luca te Pes aosc estas | ioereapaee ri saere 415.79 MO Gals ectsiens setae aot oeepel | haart aes $16,634.51 $16,634.51 Missourt Agricultural Report. APIARY INSPECTION. Name. War. No. Dr. TOSLECUISTOLOM ster a-mennt ae aon ek Sasa Sey od | Dewars wee eas $400.00 fe Biya Vi HD ar byer tor ices catterstetae ane «Secret 45... “'i\\alenn Seep ereiee 35 IME BE SD ALD Ysera cee eek etna BARS 46.0 ls Tea io) MOM CUMUISIGLONE si eticuaete one aeeein ele sere ett one 200.00 Biya ive anbiyser cic lice eeae ae se tee ete ell ATT ie dernier 94 MROsLOGUISUGLOME rs ae eee foie Micices ee ee FE ona ens aes 100.00 Byes Sa aby. i iraritericc bus cacis ter eee AS || soe yb eee 200.58 OWS OUISIb ON eee Ceres he eink te ees tere 300.00 IB YaVIS ED) an yaceueeseate oe. c+ sesh tech nae 7. 0 Dg ere cs bey dic 180.65 TOMCGuUISItlONE ease se ae teat Pach ee bum nha! cl Pen ak eta rie 100.00 By SVE. Daten cue eiie tee eee 50? |. enw 160.55 TOsneQuiSltiOnssaesty meee se wcke ae sane le ess a arene 100.00 ES VAD ALAM COM es eaicrh Cee ies es Mice Sana aime rRICEN Hic, ove, a Siton rs | Pace ee SSC ace eee 18 EO GAISE er feteeeyete ilo Pau tcc$ cc souta RIOR rene ake atelS Site" $1,200.00 $1,200.00 STATE HIGHWAY ENGING@ER. Name | War. No. Dr. ! By SON CLOT Alterra vel. oe a tL ee eee Se Aid| ES Ria i tote te, Ein .60 Win Ca DavidsSoneice Newt Aces Stays alls reas Brtiots Sree 03 Cun ciSPE es eae taro ken aan AIG), ot Naeccveae ic eae ae . 66 Vines ay DteeAty BS liek eis recs cesseector eee cee SI Wat Remo te at sum .00 Ee AvE © OllIGR rere. cia itunu tics ree toy Us ame era peeaotera aie aac 00 JANE 4 SETI JH 0 EES peta RG, 2 Ae Ne Jays LS gunn theater en avst 00 PeRuckertva; Companyean. as ao: S205" i leecheges, Heer: .45 IMIS ly Is CORSE oc anne ouoeenodos 521 Nica See ee Bir 5) MRLORLE CULMSIGL OM! sess yb miles ahs ed hn cee ariel (eee ea $2,851.09 IB yaNiTs wy Ale belli: cr. 4. cise 6 ean SQQ™ agile Meee, cee ene .00 IWeiCESDavidSOns 4 sche tee tes 1505 Seen R| RUR Mad Foie an See .97 CuTbismille ye aco cma ha Aeon FD 4w gs Uexcistein eae: 04 Cie bis MEME oa cn Sie eye ear ee ZOE ai lesen een sane eee 54 Wire@ uD awiGdSOMh, sc tens tec chorea eee 2 Gitte nly ewetnce csi seclets -40 Le LS OMNC OULSUOT OTS rycen) corse cit ele ue keera ace etic eae SAR eee 1,500.00 9 By Columbia Telephone Company....... Orie 8 Pee Ra ep Ne 65 9 CuinGi SMAI Feces oe, eee ee ee OS Meu larcem cea. seca h aan a .20 9 eRe er teen © OMp any eee fay? °) ollie lence ery Sere eer eae -40 9 WER GLI aWiGSOMeesrss en ieee a eet omen 3 O MeO scat teas acy cae 36 9 Underwood Typewriter Company.... Lai VG eee Re .00 9 Hae ALp Ev CIMLG Vey -p acs Accel cise earns he eee re 3 OMe alee ae a ram tae cata .00 1 Wise Are L Gerais ies shor hy wert eee co Yeoh Tl ees ounce eran .00 1 ie Ruckertsé& Company.-..+.-..5.-- SA rats VOUpS ei «ay ee iaee .95 12 Bialancesemrssere: Cioran nDIe lane nana Mars) OPAL? hola ico vdhay eal oraonCeo ceome Rn Ec 49 ROCA eae eev onan si wo atone al eee ease ie $1,351.09 09 Report of Secretary. 41 SUNIMARY OF “SECRETARY SsPINANCIAL STATEMENT. PRINTING AND DISTRIBUTION OF ANNUAL REPORT FUND. Date. Dr. Cr: 1913. Pains tile Gees se oreo cree To balance insour treasuy.. ss. c $337.40 Wie de LOdS ean. -.. ROsappLropLiabioninae riick ee 15,000.00 Jan: due L913 >to Jan. 12, 1914....| By warrants drawn on Treasurer of Board OfeeNericulouress cicsc cits Som eh cele kbe lege ree. $2,881.55 Janey p25 TOW s. - 2 By amount paid for printing and binding, account with printing commission....)|... 4,759). 54 Apciioy ag Ie eae a By-balance in treasury of Board of Agri- (GUULMIRDsclnou.o doles bio ou so Oso PAU MIBK lobe ager ersasrol 355.85 Veins es Tie tas eae By balance in State Treasury........... ate Sak REM Ay sy. | 7,340.43 z | Totals...... $15,337.40 | $15,337.40 MONTHLY CROP REPORT FUND. Date. ID his Cr. Afaiol, Jlils aie leet eel To balance in treasury of Board of Agri- CUltUTOC ae oe eee em ce Seay vere Sieus eee $251.48 Nayar OLS ee avens. | AMO) DI HORIOAENNOINS bono nonanoomooouudue 4,000.00 | MOxOVviercharze form Oli2een secre acne ae 64.30 Jan. 11, 1913, to | | Jan 12, 194s s| By warrants drawn on Treasurer of Board OfCArICUlGULe Aan chan Meney aes cers a ie SIE eee al ease atch rs $1,458.21 Janey ola OTA oor | By amount paid for printing, account with PLIN FINS COMMISSION eae etna a a ans tee 2,559 . 22 ame UOT a ImMByabalancenin Stavev bre asuiyeeer). eer stene) 1914. 05 IByz balances sce ee Cet rates TP rollers hahaa eer ee tea 6.29 LOA Se nc aria ws, we Gaceee oH eters $600.02 $600.02 EXPENSE OF MEMBERS. Date Dr: Cr. desi, ilile tOnkyeesooy Tosbalancessccacri oe ee $168.07 Maya NOS ro) oustate.warlanta.a nieces coe eae ee 300.00 Maye 1G; 1903. a: LoryStateLwarrantsry cick ackores ae eens 100.00 UNC a4 el Ooo see TowStatenwarrant..2 ee eet ae k ce 200.00 uly eo Ol Serre LOS tatenwarrants cca oh eer cries is 100.00 ANDES BR AUDI, oe.00 5 Mow Categwarcantre - lec ccktons tiene eles 200.00 WO. sh Wee Gaaes Loystate; warrant... src aaa 100.00 IDG PH ITB soba Towtateswaltante.rsn sie ae 200.00 Jans 2194 vasa o. Towstateswarrantin. sci pie ee ee ie 200.00 Janet O14 ese By warrants paid and) canceleds.- a5 -6 aloe) eee $1,229.12 van. 12) 19145. oe. B ya balancertss.coccets coe toc. oo oo ae oracle taal lPeoiens stovonsene 338.95 WE Otals se. ok chon OTe $1,568 . O07» $1,568.07 EXTENSION COURSE. Date. Dr. Cr: Jews iil, WOU esas MOU AN CO Snare 5s eioesc hehe oe Gas ae $478.44 Janel eel Oa eens Byawarrants paid andi canceled-as ese ees le. aco a eee $478.44 RO GAISi 2.5: cfaperailercnet sory hate sieve el see 6 $478.44 $478.44 A6 Missourt Agricultural Report. FARMERS’ INSTITUTE Date. Dr. Cr. Jane tl LOLS Ree ee RON DALAM CC} eeeee ncteieeicee testis ce ew eae ey $3,036.77 Mile ale See a & a HOnStaAveMwarna nivale or 2,150.00 Ditlivaeo el O lis pena LOWS CAUCE WaALLAalN Ger coe sis smears ss ae - 1,000,00 AIG Dyn Ol oiereien POPS CALC AWETLAM Gases ccnats tuclemicucieac tokens 1,000.00 Oct DLO US arc AN) SEES) WANE MGs oo dp nooo sc onOhonduore 350.00 WOW Sy UCB. Sess. 8 MOVStAbe WALRAD atc ere a cur Gis coos oo) nade 200.00 Decy eZ; Osea ROMS CRLChW ALL ATIUE ria tere iene oe ep sicnes 1,000.00 JANE pop Ota ak To State warrant.............. lb See 2,500.00 Jane Oa eee By warrants paid andiicanceled’),.......-|. «2. «ome $9,904.73 Vanin die el Oa eer EB VAN BILAN COb mane roceuciss cherry sleeker is oles) oS. 2 shllet ay cle) eee 1,332.04 TO GALS yi fence ote ate bam hedstorienerstras $11, 236.77 $11,236.77 STATE HIGHWAY ENGINEER. Date. Dr. Cr. Veins lik NS go. BY OVErarattient ys sot cede oct suse ne ton Flaine soe eee $197.48 wieny il, WOMB soso ull NO Siew eM, GOs ooo ooo doo ho ooods $4,351.09 Janey 25 1OT4 ene By warrants paid and canceledivi..4. 42-6 5.542 0-ee 3,977.11 Jann 2s Oa yan 2 IB yi alance ccs chee eee ET oan Sell eer ic cae 176.50 TNO GAISE Fycrerd rsh ibehaeke cise eee $4,351.09 $4,351.09 VETERINARY SERVICE: Date. Dr Cr. Aono lS eee od. oc IBYHOVEFGRALti ae. sheer eye's eae aed coer oe reste | eae ee $10.11 May 1, 1913...... MoyState warrantee cyanea eee er $3,000.00 Miay, 9637 1913" 7.3). Low tateswarrantancsy pointe ee 1,200.00 Suney TA SOUS sew MosStateswarrantee. aa hoon eee oe 1,000.00 ‘polhy &3, aeIe}s Sago MoyStateswalran teenie celecieen 1,000.00 Aue 55 Lose nnn. Morstatemwarkantrenecrncm en eee ie cn 1,300.00 Sept. 27 1913) =o. OM tate wartantinncer cise cee cree tae 1,500.00 Oyen to WON caus x MomStatetwarvantere reese 1,000.00 INOWen LOU Scr MoxcStateswaLvranthinss sje eee ee ees 1,500.00 ID CCwm el ON Sree ONS CRO sWwaArrantion. = poss) mucmetnte cee ster 1,500.00 Panny 2, LOVES. wae MoiStateswarrantyrc sss cee ieee on 1,000.00 ariel LOM AR Fie Byawarrantsspaidvandicanceled.. aint kee 13,529.56 iano?) VO4 ee . IBVs ALAN CO trek heer ee te eTeL a Meena | hee ee, Sed 460.33 TROCRIS A nrata aRee ee ee eee hee ae $14,000.00! $14,000.00 Respectfully submitted, W. A. Bricut, Treasurer. Report of State Veterinarian. A7 REPORT OF S. SHELDON, STATE VETERINARIAN. Mr. President and Gentlemen of the Missouri State Board of Agriculture: I beg to submit that part of my annual report of the work covered by this depart- ment from January 1, 1913, to September 1, 1913; also recommendations for the future work of this department. It is useless to state that we are again placed at a serious disadvantage in our sani- tary control work by an unjust oversight of the last Legislature in refusing to grant the necessary appropriation that was recommended by you for this department. Just how long the live stock industry of this State will stand for such neglect at the hands of our lawmakers remains to be seen. We are compelled to turn down important calls almost daily in order that we may not exceed the meager allowance granted this department by the last Legislature. We would most heartily recommend that you again ask for an appropriation of not less than $50,000, and that each member in his legislative district present the needs of this department to his State Senators and Representatives and urge on them that the above appropriation be secured. If the matter is properly presented there is no question as to the result. When it was found that we would have no additional funds to carry on the work of this department we were compelled to make radical changes in our plan of action for the next two years. Much of the important work that we had under consideration we were compelled to give up, but trust that at some future time it may be carried out. We would most heartily recommend that the salary of our successor be increased to not less than $3,000 per annum and that the salary of the assistants who have worked so faithfully for the protection of the live stock industry be increased from $1,500 to $1,800 per year. Wewould further recommend that if it was found that the State Veterinarian and his assistants were lb, ish SRA ts 48 Missouri Agricultural Report. not earning more than the salary recommended above, that they be promptly discharged. We _ believe that the State should receive the best possible service available. When we stop to consider that a single county can afford to pay a student $2,500 per year to assist in farm work, we feel that the State Veteri- narian, with 114 times the responsibility, is entitled to at least $3,000 per year. Our sanitary bill, introduced at the last session of the Legis- lature, governing the importation of live stock into Missouri, failed to become a law. There was no particular opposition to the bill; in fact, all agreed that it was a splendid measure and would have been enacted into a law had it been introduced earlier in the session. This bill, or a similar one, should be intro- duced early in the session at the next Legislature and supported by each of you. At present the statutory protection afforded our live stock industry is insufficient and not in keeping with other progressive states. There was introduced at the last session of the Legislature a new veterinary practice act repeal- ing the present law, which has become obsolete. The new bill should receive your support and encouragement at the next ses- sion of the Legislature, as it guarantees a much higher class of veterinary service and thereby increases the protection to the live stock industry of the State. This bill should be introduced early and each of you should be provided with a copy. Among other important features, you will find that it does away with the abominable practice of registered veterinarians acting for quacks in order that they may evade the law. It also provides for revoking the license of any veterinarian who issues fake or fraudulent health certificates, which has caused the department so much trouble in the past. DISEASES OF SHEEP. With the exception of scabies, Missouri sheep have been remarkably free from disease. We have not received a single report of foot rot, lip and leg disease or stomach worms. County quarantine, we believe, is the solution of scab eradication in sheep. The above disease will show an increase over last year; in fact, we believe that the 27 shipments of sheep to the public stockyards during the past year, infected with this disease, is certainly sufficient to make us take notice of the above disease that we have to contend with. At a meeting of the Board of Agriculture at Jefferson City on August 1st we asked for per- mission to place a quarantine against Laclede, Camden and Report of State Veterinarian. AQ Wright counties, which was granted by you, and we feel that this move should eradicate scabies from the three named counties in a comparatively short time. As soon as we can spare one of our assistants from the other important work that we are now interested in, we shall start to co-operate with the Bureau of Animal Industry, and shall expect much good to be accomplished in the eradication of this disease. In our annual report for 1912 we recommended that no sheep be released from quarantine that were affected with scabies unless they were dipped in the lime and sulphur or nicotine dip made after the government formula. However, we have modified this rule in one instance by allowing one firm manufacturing the cresol dip to supply the Kansas City stockyards with dip for the coming year. They agree, however, to remunerate the State of Missouri for any loss occurring where sheep have been dipped in the above prepara- tion and the disease has not been entirely eradicated. Early in March of this year as a matter of economy we decided to place one of our deputies in charge of scab eradication work in the counties of Howard, Shelby and Monroe. Dr. Munn of Fay- ette, Mo., was instructed to look after the infection that might exist in Howard county, Dr. Poage of Shelbina was instructed to look after Shelby county and Dr. Stuart of Paris was ap- pointed to cover Monroe county. The work of each of the above veterinarians has been entirely satisfactory, and it has been carried on with very little expense to the State. We believe that the above plan could be enlarged upon the coming year with splendid results. GLANDERS. Glanders will show a decrease again this year in the num- ber of cases reported. We have received reports of only four cases in Kansas City for the past seven months of this year, against 24 for the entire 12 months of last year. It is interest- ing to note the continued decrease of glanders in Kansas City since the closing of the open drinking fountain. However, in spite of the above fact, there is some agitation at the present time to reopen them, due, perhaps, to commercial interests trying to place a patent fountain on the market. We present herewith the report of cases in Kansas City for the past ten years, which is interesting: 1903—165 1907— 93 1911— 56 1904—295 1908—105 1912— 24 1905—115 1909— 67 1913—4 cases 1906— 81 1910— 86 and 2 suspects. 50 Missouri Agricultural Report. With the above results before you, I would recommend a quarantine against Kansas City for the protection of the rest of the State should the disease-spreading fountains again be in- stalled. St. Louis unquestionably has many cases of glanders that are not reported to this department. This is perhaps due to the carelessness or indifference of the practicing veterinarians of St. Louis. As soon as funds are available or can be spared from other important work, St. Louis should receive attention. A strict sanitary law on our statute books requiring the veteri- nary inspection of all horses imported into this State, we believe, would entirely eradicate glanders from Missouri, and within the short space of ten years it would be practically unknown. HOG CHOLERA. Hog cholera is again prevalent over the entire State. How- ever, we do not believe it will ever become as widespread as it was during 1912, for the following reasons: First, the adminis- tration of the double or simultaneous method immunizes hogs, it is believed, for life. The above method is becoming more and more popular each day, and the farsighted farmer and hog raiser will use this method to the exclusion of the single or serum alone method. The results secured by the simultaneous method warrant its continued use in the eradication of this very impor- tant disease. The fact that the serum alone method creates an immunity of from three to six weeks makes constant revac- cination necessary in order to secure protection on account of the period of immunity being so short and the danger of rein- fection so great. We again wish to direct your attention to the second recom- mendation in our last annual report when we urged that all plants engaged in the manufacture of hog cholera serum doing an interstate business be placed under the supervision of the Bureau of Animal Industry. This has been accomplished, but unfortunately the State failed to enact a law providing for the state supervision of plants distributing serum in this State. This is certainly unfortunate for hog producers, as no plant should be permitted to operate in this State that is unable or unwilling to comply with the government requirements. The section governing the disposition of the carcasses of hogs that have died of contagious diseases was changed. They must now be burned or buried under the directions of the State Veteri- narian. Unfortunately, the duty of enforcing this amendment Report of State Veterinarian. D1 was placed upon this department and no funds provided for carrying it out. In the latter part of May of this year we received informa- tion from outside sources that there was a possible chance to secure one of the three counties to be selected in each of three states to be used as a demonstration for the eradication of hog cholera by the Bureau of Animal Industry co-operating with this department. I at once informed your Secretary, and by the active co-operation of the two departments we were enabled to have Pettis county, Missouri, selected for demonstration pur- poses. We sincerely trust that this demonstration will prove of much benefit to the farmers of Missouri in the eradication of hog cholera. From time to time applications have been made to this office for the movement of hogs from the public stockyards at Kansas City and St. Joseph back to the country again for feed- ing purposes. In June of this year a committee was appointed to draw up rules and regulations whereby stock hogs could be safely moved back to the country again. After an inspection of the St. Joseph and Kansas City stockyards a meeting was held in Kansas City and rules and regulations adopted which at the present seem rather stringent, as very few have attempted to comply with the requirements. We believe that this is a step in the right direction and that the rules can be modified and stock hogs moved to the country again with safety. We suggest that this receive your earnest attention and consideration, as unquestionably it will be of material assistance to the hog raisers of this State. RABIES. The State is again remarkably free from rabies. In fact, no cases have been reported for the past seven months of this year. TEXAS FEVER. In our last annual report we recommended that the state and federal quarantine against Newton, McDonald and Oregon counties be released. We have caused frequent inspections to be made of the above named counties, which early in the season were placed under the supervision of Dr. H. C. Tuck, one of our field veterinarians, and Mr. Roark, acting for the Bureau of Animal Industry. Very little infection has been found up to the present time in the above named counties, and they should bz Missourt Agricultural Report. remain free from ticks unless infection is introduced from out- side sources. Dr. L. D. Brown, another of our field veteri- narians, was sent to Ripley county with instructions to place the county in a condition where it might be safely released at the end of this calendar year. The Bureau of Animal Industry sup- plied Mr. H. D. Crane to assist Dr. Brown in tick eradication work and the work has proceeded admirably; in fact, from reports at hand, Ripley county can be safely released from quarantine at the end of the present season. The State is cer- tainly under many obligations to the Bureau of Animal Industry and Drs. Tuck and Brown for the splendid service rendered the State in the tick eradication work. TUBERCULOSIS. This is unquestionably one of the most serious diseases with which we have to deal. Public sentiment demands that we con- tinue the splendid fight started by this department some years ago by my predecessor. Since our last report all dairies supply- ing Springfield milk or butter have been tested, also many herds in the vicinity of Mexico. A retest was ordered for Columbia, with the result that one splendid dairy herd was found to be badly infected with tuberculosis. We would especially direct your attention to the herd above referred to as all herds were tested in 1911 in and around Columbia and a retest made in 1912, yet we found that the infection was introduced from some out- side source. It is certainly gratifying to note that no tubercu- losis was found in any herd save the one mentioned, where 24 head were quarantined. Several herds have been tested in the vicinity of St. Louis, and without an exception those receiving the first official test were found to be badly infected. We are confident that tuberculosis exists to an alarming degree in the dairies supplying St. Louis with milk and butter. If the citizens of St. Louis would demand that their milk supply be produced from officially tested dairies it would only be a short time until they would enjoy clean, wholesome milk. Kansas City has an ordinance requiring all cattle from which milk is produced to be tuberculin-tested, yet anyone calling him- self a veterinarian is allowed to apply the tuberculin test and his certificate is accepted, with the result that the careful, conscien- tious veterinarian is very little in demand and those that never find tuberculosis are employed to do the testing. Only four reacting cows have been reported to this office in the past 20 Report of State Veterinarian. aS) months. The above shows the result of an unofficial test. We have tendered Kansas City our assistance provided they would furnish the necessary lay help and route the dairy herds for us. The feed inspector of Kansas City agreed to this, yet officially no action has been taken by him. Joplin and Excelsior Springs have, or will in the near future, pass an ordinance requiring the official test of all dairy cows supplying milk and butter to each of the above cities. They should have our co-operation and support. During the past winter the Hereford breeders filed many applications for the tuberculin test. We looked after them as rapidly as possible, and it is certainly gratifying to note that out of the many herds tested no tuberculosis was found in the Hereford breeds. We believe it is only a question of time until the pure-bred breeder, who expects to sell cattle interstate, will be compelled to have his herd officially tested until they are found free from tuberculosis. Most of the different states with but two exceptions require that cattle intended for dairy or breeding purposes be officially tested before they will receive them. Many badly tubercular herds are located due to, interstate shipments, therefore we recently requested an opinion from the Attorney-General’s office on sec- tion 712, in which he advised us that we had absolute authority to take charge of any herd and hold it in quarantine until it was Officially tested without expense to the owner. This section should be rigidly enforced, and in this way the most dangerous herds in the State will be located and the disease placed under control. S. SHELDON, State Veterinarian. 54 Missourt Agricultural Report. REPORT OF D. F. LUCKEY, STATE VETERINARIAN. Gentlemen of the Missouri State Board of Agriculture: Supplementary to the report ren- dered by Dr. Sheldon covering the work -of this office during the greater part of this year, I wish to submit herewith a few statements covering various mat- ters since I assumed the office, Sep- tember 1, 1913. SHEEP SCAB. From Dr. Sheldon’s report I got the impression that sheep scab had become widespread in Camden, La- clede and Wright counties. I madea personal visit to each of these counties and held mass meetings with those interested in sheep industry in each county. I found that scabies was present only in limited areas in each of these counties, and I effected local organizations of the sheep men whereby I think all sheep in the infected areas will be properly dipped and cured without the necessity of a quarantine. Numerous shipments of scabby sheep have come from Morgan county during the present year, and it seems that there is probably more scabies among sheep in this county than anywhere else in the State. The sale or shipment of scabby sheep is a violation of the law of the State. Scabies in sheep is easily cured by dipping. I have notified shippers in Morgan county of this law, and have taken the matter up with the prose- cuting attorney. Hereafter we will rigidly prosecute all who ship diseased sheep, and in this way I think we can thoroughly control the matter. Dr. D. F. Luckey. Or Or Report of State Veterinarian. TUBERCULOSIS QUARANTINE REGULATIONS UPHELD. On December 2, 1913, the temporary injunction restraining the State Veterinarian from enforcing the cattle tuberculosis quarantine regulations came up for hearing in the Circuit Court of St. Louis. The temporary injunction was dissolved, and later the quarantine regulations were declared just and valid. During the past two years these regulations have been evaded in different ways, especially by shipments of cattle from the states of Illinois and New York. Either through fraudulent inspections by veterinarians or through the ‘plugging’ of diseased cattle to make them pass inspection by an honest veterinarian, a large number of tuberculous cattle have been shipped from both of these states. The veterinarians of the State of Illinois are making an honest effort to purge their ranks of those who would pass tuberculous cattle for sound. So far as I know, no particular effort is being made in the State of New York along this line. Under present conditions, it seems abso- lutely necessary to exercise the authority given under Rule V of our quarantine regulations and hold all dairy and breeding cattle from the states of Illinois and New York for a retest ninety days after arrival in this State. Orders to this effect have been sent out to all railroad companies and deputies in this State. It has been found that some are shipping cattle into this State ostensibly for pasturing, feeding or immediate slaughter and subsequently selling them for dairy and breeding purposes. During the coming year we will attempt to keep check on cattle coming into the State without the tuberculin test, and if it is found that this liberal provision of the regulations is being abused it may be necessary to require the tuberculin test of all female cattle. It is to be regretted that a few unprincipled dealers and veterinarians persist in a course which eventually brings more or less hardship and inconvenience upon those who are honest and efficient. The observations of the inspection of cattle for interstate shipment, and especially of dairy cattle, show plainly that we need in all of the states a strict law regulating the practice of veterinary surgery. The time is now at hand when everyone who 56 Missourt Agricultural Report. does any kind of veterinary work at all, especially those who have anything to do with the treatment or immunization of live stock, should be required to secure a license for that purpose. When- ever any incompetent or fraudulent work is done the license can be revoked. At present there are numerous unlicensed persons going about the State using hog cholera serum and, in many cases, causing heavy losses. There are also those who are absolutely incompetent, making fake health certificates for dairy cattle. The veterinary practice act should by all means be so amended as to fix the responsibility in such cases so that all offending parties could be brought to justice. HOG CHOLERA. Hog cholera is still quite widespread over the State. There is no definite plan in operation in this State for its control, and nobody in particular is charged with its control. There is no effective system for securing information as to-its prevalence. It would be difficult for anybody to place the responsibility for the lack of results in hog cholera control work. It still seems to me that our system (if what we are doing may be called a system) is seriously at fault, and the whole matter needs to be gone over and some organization perfected which will be effective in controlling hog cholera. By all means some definite plan ought to be worked out and presented to the public so that hog owners might know whom to depend upon for assistance, with whom to co-operate and whom to hold responsible for lack of results. ‘It has become very evident that if any department is to control hog cholera without unusual and unnecessary expense it must be vested with authority to quarantine affected hogs, enforce various police measures, be supplied with potent hog cholera serum, and must be prepared to take charge of out- breaks promptly. It is to be regretted that for the lack of such an organization being perfected promptly at the time hog cholera serum was discovered the State has since unnecessarily lost millions of dollars worth of hogs. According to recommendations to your Board from time to time, and strongly urged at the annual meeting, December 28, 1910, and through the persistent urging of my predecessor, a system has at last been inaugurated whereby stock hogs may be vaccinated and taken from the public yards for stock purposes. Report of State Veterinarian. Diy This has already stopped a great waste at the yards of hogs that were entirely unfit for slaughtering purposes. As far as can be ascertained, this system is proving successful and in all prob- ability may be extended to apply to all stockyards. The waste of hogs prevented by this system at the yards will amount to much more than the entire cost of supporting the office and force of the State Veterinarian. An attempt following the correct theory is being made to control hog cholera in Pettis county. Yet it would appear that the most expensive instead of the most economical system was adopted in this work, and that the longest way around instead of the shortest way through has been followed. There is em- ployed on this work duplicate, if not triplicate, forces. On analysis of the situation we find representatives of the Federal Government going about administering hog cholera serum. When they find diseased hogs that are not properly controlled, or infected premises that are not being cared for, they return to headquarters. At an additional unnecessary expense of six or seven dollars per day a Deputy State Veterinarian drives back to the same territory and issues quarantine orders. We find that right in the midst of all this hog cholera work some breeder wants his hogs injected to be exhibited at the State Fair, and a student packs his grip with some hog cholera serum from the Missouri Experiment Station and puts the State to an additional, unnecessary expense. The business arrangement of this hog cholera eradication work is so far from economical as to appear almost ludicrous. Furthermore, infected and ex- posed hogs of numerous owners over the county which were in- jected with serum in November were still found dying Decem- ber 20th. This indicates that either the hog cholera in Pettis county is of an extremely chronic nature or that the serum used on these hogs was impotent. It seems to me that if the Board of Agriculture could make some arrangements whereby a Deputy State Veterinarian could be supplied with potent hog cholera serum good results could be obtained with about one-third or one-fourth of the cost under the present system. When one veterinarian goes out twenty to twenty-five miles distant to examine a lot of hogs infected with cholera, it seems silly to return to headquarters and send another veterinarian to administer the serum, or vice versa, thereby duplicating the expense. When it comes to making an official call by this department in some extreme corner of the State and o8 Missourt Agricultural Report. then returning to Columbia and sending a student from the Agricultural College to apply the serum, you can readily see that the expense of this control work would be entirely unreason- able. Such a procedure seems so void of good business sense that I have not undertaken hog cholera investigations at all. TEXAS FEVER. I am glad to report that the last area of any extent infested with Texas fever ticks has been cleaned up. On November Ist the federal quarantine on parts of Ripley county was released. There are a few limited ticky areas yet in the State, but here- after all such infestation can be controlled by farm quarantines, and the Texas fever quarantine regulations are no longer of any use. In fact, the regulations are not only useless, but are more or less of a hindrance to the legitimate movement of cattle. I, therefore, recommend that the Texas fever quarantine regula- tions under date of August 19, 1912, be entirely rescinded. There is no further necessity for these regulations as pertaining to the movement of-cattle within the State. The federal quar- antine regulations will fully protect the State from ticky’ cattle from without. Our regulations are, therefore, a duplication of those of the Federal Government and are entirely unnecessary. There never has been a successful prosecution under these regu- lations. All prosecutions for violation of the quarantine have been brought in the federal courts, and, in most cases, have been successful. Furthermore, there is a statute which is much more binding and more easily enforced than these quarantine regula- tions which specifically forbid anyone to drive ticky cattle into or across this State. These regulations are, therefore, mani- festly superfluous and should be recalled forthwith. SPLENDID PROGRESS IN TUBERCULOSIS ERADICATION WORK. During the past year Texas fever work in Southern Missouri and hog cholera eradication work in Pettis county took almost half of the time of our three regular deputies. For several months during the year our tuberculosis eradication work came to astandstill. Yet, considering everything, very satisfactory prog- ress has been made. In looking over the results of this work for several years, they are especially gratifying. Our plans in the beginning were to take up the dairy inspection, co-operating with different cities of this State. The city passed an ordinance requiring the dairy inspection, and our force has supplied the Report of State Veterinarian. 59 veterinarians to inspect the cattle. We have made a general inspection of practically all of the dairy cattle, including single cows from which butter was sold, around Hannibal, Warrens- burg, Independence, Columbia, St. Joseph, Springfield and Sedalia. In addition to this, we have kept up the annual retest- ing of the dairy herds furnishing certified milk to the cities. We have begun the tests of all Hereford herds of the State, but for the lack of funds have not been able to carry this work forward. We have begun an official test of the dairies around Joplin and almost completed the test at Excelsior Springs. We still have several hundred applications around these two places. One of the most gratifying features of this work is that a retest of the dairy cattle around different cities has shown that our work was thorough and effective. In our retest for Sedalia we did not find a single tuberculous cow. Goley 7; -Gooper, (95; Dade, 3; Daviess, 10; DeKalb, 9; Dent, 1; Franklin, 9; Gasconade, 1; Gentry, rl2:(Greene,.4; Grundy, 12: Harrison, 11:)Henry, Is: Hickory, 1; Holt, 6; Howard, 51; Howell, 1; Jackson, 37; Jasper, 21: Jefferson, 2; Johnson, 72; Knox, 8; Laclede, 4; Lafayette, 13; Lawrence, 15; Lewis, 10; Lincoln, 12; Linn, 19; Livingston, 13; Macon. illo.) Madison, 3; Maries, 3; Marion; 25:57) Viercer, ol: Miller, 4; Mississippi, 4; Moniteau, 12; Monroe, 32; Mont- gomery, 36; Morgan, 5; New Madrid, 1; Newton, 4; Nodaway, i2-Onregon, I> Osage, t: Perry, 1; Pettis, 67; Pikes23 Platter 6); Pulaski, 1; Putnam, 1; Ralls, 5; Randolph, 26; Ray, 5; Ripley, 2; St Charles. 14: (St-iClair, 6; St. Francois; 6: Stes Genevieve ul: Si@wouis.'26- city of St. Louis, 20; Saline, Soguscovlamd an: Scott, 1; Shelby, 7; Stoddard, 3; Sullivan, 6;,Taney, 1; Vernon, 2; Warren, 10; Washington, 5; Worth, 2; Wright, 4. Following the custom inaugurated five years ago, the Board of Agriculture provided a registry for all visitors at Farmers’ Week, and presented each one who registered with an official badge. This badge is illustrated in connection with this article. It is through the liberality of the Columbia Commercial Club that this feature was made possible. The Farmers’ Ham and Bacon Show, organized in 1913 by the State Board of Agriculture, was again an interesting feature of the week. An account of this show is made a part of this report. The State Corn Show, covered in another part of this report, was an exceptionally strong one, considering ,the season 70 Missourt Agricultural Report. of 1913. The entries of small grain were numerous and of excellent quality. One of the fine features of the week was the annual banquet provided by the Agricultural College and attended by some 500 farmers. The large dining hall was completely filled. Among the speakers were Governor Elliott W. Major and others promi- nent in public life or in agricultural work. In the following pages will be found a report of the proceed- ings of the week. We regret that all of these reports are not com- plete, but it was impossible to secure copies of all addresses and papers. For this report, as published, the Board of Agriculture is greatly indebted to the secretaries of the various associations and to members of the Agricultural College faculty. MISSOURI FARMERS’ WEEK. (Hon. George B. Ellis, editor The Missouri Farmer, Columbia, Mo., and former Secretary of the Missouri State Board of Agriculture.) Have you ever attended Farmers’ Week, held under the auspices of the State Board of Agriculture? If you have you know something about the enthusiasm this great annual event begets in the minds of those who gather in the Agricul- tural College each January. The inspiration and information farmers have received from the exhibitions, demonstrations and lectures during Farmers’ Week has been a very great factor in the wonderful awakening we have seen in the last few years in the betterment of farm practices and in rural life conditions. The good influence of these meetings does not stop with the few thousands who have been fortunate enough to attend, but through the publications of the Board, the publicity of the press and the missionary work of those who have attended this influ- ence has reached the remotest corners of the State. I have been asked to give a brief reminiscence of the organi- zation and development of the annual meeting known as ““Farm- ers’ Week.’ Looking back for a great many years we find that different classes of farmers have been organized in State associa- tions for mutual benefit, but until the organization of Farmers’ Week no successful effort had ever been made to bring all classes of farmers together for conference and for instruction. Some of Hon. George B. Ellis. Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. fo the older associations were the State Horticultural Society, the State Dairymen’s Association, the Swine Breeders’ Association, the Road Improvement Association and others, but each of these had its own meeting place, and there seemed to be no successful effort to unite all these various societies in one powerful organiza- tion. It is true that as far back as 1898 a number of these asso- ciations met in the same place at the same time. Included with those already mentioned were the Improved Live Stock Breeders, the Missouri Grange, and the State Poultry Association. These meetings were held in various towns, Mexico, Chillicothe, Fay- ette, Columbia, Sedalia and Springfield being among the places where the meetings were held. There was more or less local interest in each town where the meeting assembled, but the pub- licity, except what the State Board gave through its publications, was limited to the locality where the meeting was held, and even that, in some instances, was very poor. The writer attended several of these meetings, and the last two—those held at Chillicothe in December, 1901, and at Spring- field in December, 1902—were under his supervision. He saw the loss of any cumulative influence growing out of these meet- ings, as the enthusiasm for each meeting had to be worked up as if it were the first meeting of the kind ever held. The associa- tions of the different interests would do very good work for a year or two; then some of them would die and others would be organ- ized. There seemed to be no permanency in the plan. While these meetings had all been fostered by the Board of Agriculture they were not under the control of the Board, but each organiza tion controlled its own affairs. The meeting place and general arrangements were made by the Board, acting with a committee of one delegate from each association. This committee had been in the habit of voting the meeting to the town offering the best bid for it. It cost considerable money to pay the necessary expenses of these meetings in the matter of printing programs, paying for prominent speakers and for premiums for the State Poultry Show, which at that time received no State support. When the time came for selecting the next meeting a delegation from Sedalia submitted a proposition asking for the meeting, and also a delegation representing the Commercial Club of Joplin offered a purse of $400 to pay poultry premiums and free enter- tainment for the officers and members of the Board and speakers on the program. This was a handsome proposition on the part of Joplin, and seemed certain of acceptance. W2. Missouri Agricultural Report. Having the responsibility of the permanent success of the work of the Board by reason of my position as Secretary, I had for some time been thinking of a plan that would arouse the whole State as to the importance of the work of both the Board of Agriculture and the College of Agriculture. (In writing this statement I hope I may not appear egotistic, for in anything I may have done my only aim was the betterment of the farmers of Missouri.) Both the Board and the college had been doing splendid work for many years, but for some years their efforts were not appreciated—even among farmers at that time there was widespread prejudice against both institutions. I had observed that the reason for this prejudice was largely a lack of understanding or familiarity with what the college and Board were doing, or, at least, what they were trying to do. It seemed to me that if the meetings were held in the college and the home of the Board of Agriculture that gradually the farmers. who attended would become extension representatives for their respective communities and in that way would soon have the support of at least a large majority of the farmers throughout the State. I made this plea before the committee and begged them to hold the next meeting in the Agricultural College, Columbia, in January, 1904. I was asked what money con- sideration Columbia had to offer and I was compelled to say, ““Not one cent—we can only give you a place of meeting and an opportunity of visiting the College of Agriculture, which should be the pride of every intelligent farmer of the State.” To my great surprise the plea won the committee and an unanimous vote was given for a trial meeting in the State Univer- sity. The next meeting was therefore held in January, 1904, and all organizations in the State representing any line of agricul- ture or live stock were invited tojoinus. Early in 1903 a Corn Growers’ Association was organized among the students of the Agricultural College and their first annual meeting was held under the auspices of the Board of Agriculture in January, 1904, and a corn show was held, but it was a very poor show, and would not be classed as a corn show today in the most remote district of the State. The few farmers who attended this first meeting were enthusiastic about the work of the Board and the College, and unanimously voted to continue the meetings here, and since that each succeeding year has seen an increased interest and attendance. Up to this time the meetings had been held for two or three days, but it was seen that a big program such as we Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. ds wanted to give could not be rendered in so short a time, and this led to the arrangement for a week’s program and the adoption of the name ‘Farmers’ Week,” and the first meeting under the new name was held January, 1906, under the auspices of the State Board of Agriculture. If there is a farmer in the State who has not heard something of the Board of Agriculture and College of Agriculture through Farmers’ Week, it is because he does not read the papers, for it would be hard to find a paper that has not given wide publicity to this annual farmers’ round- up. Those familiar with the growth of the Agricultural College know that one of the great factors influencing such growth has been the direct results of Farmers’ Week. It was largely through the influence of the men who had attended these meetings that the Legislature made the appropriation for the $100,000 new agricultural building which now adorns the campus of the State University, as well as for the large appropriations for betterments of the college and Experiment Station. The Board of Agricul- ture first suggested these appropriations and, with only passive support from the University authorities, fought them through the Legislature, and we are proud of the fact that the agricul- tural department has become, in many respects, the greatest of all the departments of our great State University. One of the great features of Farmers’ Week is the State Corn Show, which has grown in ten years from a small show of very common corn to a magnificent show of almost perfect exhibits, and it is recognized as one of the leading shows of the United States. A more recent feature is the ham and bacon show, which is destined to restore to the farms the good old practice of making nice, sweet hams and bacon, and while it may rob millionaire packers of a little of their profit, it will keep more money in the pockets of the farmers to be used in building better homes, better schools and better roads. Another feature of Farmers’ Week which has a great future is the Rural Life Con- ference, which was organized by W. L. Nelson, Assistant Secre- tary of the Board, as was also the ham and bacon show. This Rural Life Conference, if supplemented with community clubs all over the State, will prove a great influence for better schools and roads and for all those better things of life for which we are all seeking. The great success of Farmers’ Week has been due, first, to the cause, and second, to the hearty co-operation of the officers A—6 74 Missourt Agricultural Report. and members of the Board of Agriculture, together with the president of the State University and the faculty of the College of Agriculture. This co-operation, backed up by the enthusiastic support of the farmers, has given our great State a prominent place among all the states of the Union in the work for agricul- tural betterment, and it is only by a continued and united effort that we can maintain our position. Let the Board and the col- lege continue to lead, and may we, as loyal farmers, support them, to the end that Missouri may become the home of the greatest body of successful farmers in all this great country of ours. THINGS THAT MAKE LIFE IN THE COUNTRY WORTH WHILE. (S. M. Jordan, ‘Sedalia, Mo.) Did it ever occur to you that a college professor knows only a little? A lawyer knows just a little; a doctor knows a little bit; a farmer knows something; a merchant has a few “‘notions:”’ an institute lecturer may have an idea or two. In other words, no one man knows any great amount, and the world does not care whether you know any great amount about many things or not. But if the college professor and the lawyer and the doctor and the merchant and the institute lecturer and the farmer combine their information it makes a lot of it, doesn’t it? That is why we are here—to combine our information. We are going to play a joke on you tonight. You are tricked, and it may be you will conclude you are tricked a good deal worse before the day is entirely over. Some of the speakers cannot be here tonight, so I have been asked to make this lec- ture a continued story, and I am going to make you the promise of doing like the little boy did—he saved the best apple until the last. For a little while this afternoon I am going to tell you just a few things that we are doing to make country life worth while, and I believe that country life is the most worth while for the simple reason that those events in your lifetime that have made the most lasting impressions upon your memory were events that took place in the country. You may have lived in town, but one of the happiest days you ever spent was when you made that excursion to the countryside. Why, we all remember the “old swimming hole,’ don’t we? How when we started to Sunday school some of us forgot sometimes, and when we went home and Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 1D had been asked whether we had been to Sunday school or not and we said, “‘yes, ma’am,”’ but after awhile, when mother looked a little bit closer and found sand in our hair, there was trouble brewing. Soon after entering upon our duties in Pettis county we began working in co-operation with the county superintendent of schools. About the first thing that we did was to give notice last fall, after school opened, that we would group the districts and make trips explaining the how and why and the method of gathering and storing seed corn. We made the visits to the schools as we had agreed, and many of the boys and girls went into the fields following that and secured seed corn for their farms. The county superintendent said: ““Now every teacher who will take the pupils to the cornfield and put in the day gathering seed corn will be given credit for a day’s work in school, and the teacher will be given full credit for attendance in school.” The matter is not that a lesson be given within a little dusty schoolhouse to be a lesson in their school life. The greatest lessons that have ever been are in the open field from God’s great Book. We took the little folks a little farther in their seed work and asked them to test clover seed and alfalfa seed for purity. One fellow said that he made fun of a girl teaching agriculture over at their country school. ‘‘Why,”’’ he says, ‘“‘that girl has lived in town nearly all her life and she is teaching farming to the children.’? One day one of his little chaps asked him for some clover seed. He did not know what she wanted with it, but he gave her the seed and she carried it over to school. In a few days she came back and said, ‘‘Papa, that clover seed of yours has sour dock and buckhorn in it.’’ He said, ‘‘She was only twelve years of age, but she knew more about the impurities of seed than I did, and I had farmed for over thirty years. She picked out sour dock and buckhorn and showed it to me.” We took up that line of work with the children for the rea- son that such work is easy for them. It was attractive, they enjoyed it. Carrying the work through the schools, in a very short time we found that they were able to identify or recognize the noxious weed seeds that usually grow in our clover field. As a result, the farmers began bringing their samples of seed to the office to have them looked over. I can take a twelve- year-old boy or girl into the office and in about thirty minutes 76 Missourt Agricultural Report. have that youngster able to recognize the seed of the sour dock, the buckhorn, plantain and some others. When the farmer comes in and exhibits his sample of seed I pick out those impuri- ties and show him, and tell him what they are. He recognizes them; we look at them through the glass, and the next time when he wants to consider the question of clover seed he doesn’t need to bring a sample at all; he can look over it for himself or have his little folks do it for him. ‘ With reference to the seed work, in helping the farmers, I told the seedsmen over there that I would be of assistance to them as long as they handled the best seeds that money would buy. If they did other than that I would fight them to a finish. I told them that I was telling them that for the reason I wanted no misunderstanding. There has been no misunderstanding. And if there has been any unkind thought toward me in my work by any of the seedsmen I am not aware of it. A man would bring a sample of seed to the office; I would look it over, and if there were impurities in it I would pick them out; sometimes if he was not satisfied that he was doing work that was good enough, or if there were seeds that I was not able to recognize, I would send them over here to the University. Ina few days they would come back. We took that sample of seed, together with the government analysis, and put it right on our table with the man’s name on it and where the seed came from. If it happened to be good seed it was a mighty good advertise- ment, was it not? But there were no secrets in the process. As a result, this past season the seed dealers have been sub- mitting their samples of seed to the office and having them looked over before they bought their stock. Last Legislature we got pretty badly put out with some of those fellows down there at Jefferson City. I don’t know whether we actually called them ugly names or not, but we thought them, because they did not see the thing as we did and they did not pass what we called “the pure seed law.’’ Missouri has no pure seed law, but in Pettis county we have an arrangement that is a better thing than any law that can be put on any statute book. The children in the schools have assisted greatly in working out this one problem in Pettis county. Some one said that man is the greatest institution in the world, and I believe that— unless perhaps—I think, however, that if there is any difference, woman is a little bit better. In our work to try to make country life worth while over in Pettis county I am giving credit to a Report of Missouri Farmers’ Week. eh very great degree to the men of Pettis county. We have a splendid bunch over there; they are men as progressive as men are anywhere and are doing an excellent work; but for the great work in helping out in the schools and in the homes of Pettis county we will have to give the credit to the good women of that county. Do you endorse that? In addition to our organization of men, consisting of about 660 members, the Home Makers’ Club has something like 280 members, and I believe that the 280 women got more actual work done in the way of bettering Pettis county than have the 660 men. In the piece of work that we have taken up for further organization we have only started it in Pettis county. We found our organization as it was inadequate. We have one or two organizations now already formed in the county, and I go next Monday to assist in another one. Invariably these organi- zations have started where there were some one or two or three persons that could and would lead. There are a great many that would like to lead out in the work, but are not capable of doing it, incapacitated for some reason or other. Others attempt to lead and make failures, so that without a leader in a community it is a very difficult matter to get the work done that we would like to have. A short time ago we began work to find out how many silos are in Pettis county and how many acres of alfalfa are growing in Pettis county. Together with the county superintendent I wrote a letter to each teacher in the 102 rural schools. From the 102 rural schools I received 71 replies. If we cannot get a teacher to help in a community, what is the hope for that com- munity? Seventy-one out of 102 made reply. I think one of the reasons, however, that there were several that did not reply is that we have some districts in the county in which there are no silos, I am sorry to say, and some in which there is no alfalfa growing, and I am just as sorry to say that. My objective point will be to have at least a small field of alfalfa growing in every school district of Pettis county in one year from now. The facts are that alfalfa is easier to grow in Pettis county than red clover. You believe that? Just a little bit of record of it. It is a good notion not to believe much. A neighbor of mine used to say, ““Don’t believe anything you hear nor half you say yourself,’’ and that has been the plan I have been working on here, especially when a fellow tells me something cannot be 78 Missourt Agricultural Report. done, and they assured me in Pettis county that we could not grow alfalfa. A teacher’s report from one district said, ‘““There is no alfalfa growing in this district; the soil is not adapted for it, and men tried it a few years ago and failed.” I have been running down the men who did try alfalfa prior to 1912. I have discovered sixteen men who put out a field of alfalfa and ten of them made good. Six failed. Sixty-two and one-half per cent were successful. I found men in Pettis county growing as good alfalfa as a man need desire to raise, and every one of them was doing exactly what my good friend Miller and some more folks over here told him he had to do, yet people within one mile of this man did not know how they were doing it. JI am telling it on them. That is part of my business. A man within a mile of ““Uncle Nick’? Gentry did not know how he was getting such a splendid crop of alfalfa every year off the ground, and how Judge Sneed was getting such a splendid crop of alfalfa, and how Mr. Brandt, south of town, was doing the same thing. A man a mile away did not know how they were doing the work; some of them do not yet. Since 1912 and 1913 the number of fields put out according to the census that we have was forty. Forty fields put out in 1912: and 1913 and four of them failed. Thirty-six were suc- cessful, or ninety per cent were successful. Some fields may die during the winter. J don’t know; I cannot prevent the weather from heaving the plants out of the ground, but if they will let me help them next summer, if there is any trouble brew- ing, I can cure it. I can avoid their alfalfa trouble if they will tell me about it. I want beginners to let me select their ground for them, unless they think they know. One man said, “I don’t know any- thing about alfalfa, but I would like to grow it. I know it isa profitable crop. I wish you would come up and tell me how to do it.”’ I went to him, picked out his ground and told him what to do. I think I wrote the directions on a piece of paper. He followed them to the letter, just as closely as it is possible for a man to do. When he cut his crop last spring the first time, when it was ready to put into the barn—that was off of two acres—he called some neighbors in to estimate the weight as he did not have'scales. The estimated weight by himself and his neighbors was four tons of alfalfa hay—the first time it was ever cul. Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 79 Another man who had followed the same directions said to me, “I did not weigh it, but on three acres I got seven ‘whaling’ big loads.”’ The second cuttings for each of those men was per- haps less than half a ton per acre, because there was no rain between the first and the second cuttings; the next cutting ran about three-quarters of a ton; the fourth crop I do not have a record of. One of these men was in a neighborhood where there are a number of people that do not believe in Sam Jordan, but they came over there to see how he grew alfalfa, and some of them actually asked him to go and pick out their land and tell them what to do so they can grow alfalfa. And he can do it. It matters not whether they believe in me or disbelieve; that does not make any difference, but they are getting information just the same. So we are trying to make every one in our county a teacher of the good things we find out. Of the forty fields ninety per cent were successful. I do not know the per cent of successful clover fields last year, but in the entire county we got one—now mind, I am not saying anything ugly or mean about red clover—one of the best plants the Lord ever made. We don’t treat it right. We abuse red clover more than any other crop we put out. Had we had as bad luck with alfalfa I no doubt would have lost my job. If you are going to put out corn you want a good seed bed; if you are going to put out wheat you will get the bed ready for it. If you are going to put out oats you sometimes fix a toler- ably good seed bed, but when you sow clover you don’t make any seed bed at all, just scatter it out on top of the ground and trust to the Lord for the balance. Well, the latter part of that is all right, but the Lord helps them that help themselves, and He does not expect you to treat clover seed in that way. If you do He is going to go back on you about three times out of five. Another feature of the work of improvement in the county to make country life worth while, I want to mention tonight, is that while the man and woman and boy and girl are the greatest ‘‘institutions’’ possible, what makes those people the greatest “institutions” hinges on the fertility of the soil and the home. Do you know that a good man and worn-out soil can not live together? The man will either make that soil better or the soil will make him poorer. Good citizenship lies close to fertile soil, and we are using every effort that we can, putting in every day that we are able, and sometimes Sunday, too, in traveling 80 Missourt Agricultural Report. over the country telling the story of how to make farm life better. Every influence in this country is asserting itself on that one proposition, because the country life is the very lifeblood of this nation. Without it all business must, more or less, go down. In my travels over the country I have taken some very long trips, and the people are all wanting to know what we are doing over in Pettis county and how we are doing it, so that if we are accomplishing anything worth while somebody else can help do the same thing. I, maybe, might refer just a moment to the county farm adviser, he is sometimes called, and I wish they had another name for him. That doesn’t tell any story about him. He is scarcely in any sense at all an adviser, and “‘expert’’ is worse than that. Sometimes call me “Professor,” and I wish they would not do it. They call everybody ‘Professor,’ from a college president down to a street fakir, and, according to Webster’s Dictionary, it is about right. “Farm Helper” will not quite do, because we do so much that is not farm work at all. A vast number of questions come up about their troubles in town, their lawns, their gardens, and other things. Sometimes it is a case of arbitration and the county man has to be an arbi- tration bureau; these things have to be considered. Some farmers have raised the objection and say: “‘Why not mer- chants have advisers, why not bankers have advisers?” Why, they do, and the best advisers that money will buy. The Wabash Railroad and the Burlington Railroad and the Santa Fe Railroad have the very best advisers that money will buy. The President of the United States surrounds himself with the brightest intellects in the nation to advise him. The Governor of the State surrounds himself with men of the best capacity to advise him in his work. Why only a little while ago I was invited to attend a bankers’ convention over in Boston and talk to them for thirty minutes— give them a little advice, if you please. In other words, they wanted to know what they could do to make farm life worth while. They took me over by a special train, as good as the Wabash builds, stopped off with me at Niagara Falls for six hours that I might see the Falls, and kept me in Boston from Sunday morning until the Saturday morning following. And then took me over to Albany, and on Sunday sent me down the Hudson to New York City, and while I was in New York City— by the way, did you ever feel the lonesomeness of the crowd Report of Missouri Farmers’ Week. 81 and of the great city? If you ever felt that lonesomeness it was cured by a trip where you could see nature in its operation. So we went out to the Zoological Park, and just a little story that happened as we were going out: There were four men together; we all posed as bankers; I was among them, and I acted like a banker, too, and on going out to the park we did not know how to get there, so we asked the policeman. He told us to take the subway car and go to the end of the line, and then we were at the Zoological Park. As we went down the stairway there was a man there with a carriage, a two-seated rig, and he spoke to us very gently, and we asked him where the entrance was to the Zoological Park. He said, “It is down there about three- quarters of a mile,’ and “J take people down there; I would like to haul you down there.” We asked, “What will you charge?’ “Well,” said he, “‘I will take you down for a quarter apiece.’ We thought that a pretty good bargain and traded. He loaded us into the wagon and on the way took us down a road and in a back way, and finally unloaded us at the adminis- tration building, but on the way my friend up here from Salis- bury—he is a pretty good joker, too—reached over and tapped the fellow on the shoulder and asked, “‘Mister, got any Illinois hill-billies in this park?” He thought he was jollying the driver a little bit, but that fellow had us worked all right, and when we got out of the carriage and looked around we saw the main entrance to the park within fifty steps of where we got off the car. I said to the boys, “‘Maybe no hill-billies in this park but there are four suckers.” I went over there, traveling 3,100 miles to talk to those people, advise them as it were for thirty minutes, and they paid the freight. That speech cost them $4 a minute, and I have thought ever since that it was not worth it. But anyway, I was on the route from there with some mighty big guns. I was trying to get away with it. I made the first speech in the afternoon and James J. Hill made the next one and Dr. George Vincent of the University of Minnesota made the next one, and with the three of us together we got the American Bankers’ Association to appoint a committee on agricultural develop- ment. One of the greatest organizations in all of this country recognized the movement that you and I are trying to promul- gate. So that, when we all pull together—the college professor, the merchant and the lawyer, the doctor, the farmer, the banker and the institute lecturer, and every man and every woman 82 Missourt Agricultural Report. who can lend a ray of sunshine for today and a gleam of hope for tomorrow, adding to the sum total of human happiness—life in the country and in the town will be worth while, and such will not have lived in vain and such will make the good State of Missouri a better Missouri. THE ESSENTIALS OF FARM CREDIT. (Hon. B. F. Harris, Champaign, I11.) When the automobile was first introduced it was said it would find its greatest employment and be most used in France, because it required the good, hard roads which they had par excellence. By the same logic it was prophesied that the United States having bad roads most of the time and poor roads all the time could not use the automobile to any extent. This prophet, however, did not know us, nor our habit of building from the top down—getting the cart before the horse. Contrary to prophecy, we excel in the use of the automobile as we do in bad roads—we got the automobile before we got dependable roads—but, work- ing in our illogical way, the automobile is going to bring good roads a generation earlier than otherwise. The same trait is now finding another illustration in our cry for better farm financing methods before we begin to cor- rect our ruinously bad and wasteful farming methods, which are such as to forbid or call for anything but longer term loans at lower rates. At our present pace of soil exhaustion there would be no farm or fertility left, and the mortgagor would find an abandoned farm at the end of the long term mortgage. Yet after all, this cry for better farm loan rates is going to have its effect in bringing modern and permanent farm methods years sooner than otherwise. The first point I want to bring home, speaking as a farmer and as a friend of agriculture—of 20th century agriculture as a business proposition, and opposed to and condemning the average, present-day haphazard farming—is the necessity of modern and systematic farming, not alone for the increased re- turns it will bring, but as absolutely demanded for soil pres- ervation as well as for self-preservation. As agriculture, or the soil, is the basis of all our social and material superstructure, we know, but need to be reminded, that the character and per- manency of the latter depend entirely upon the constructive, permanent and conserving methods we employ on the farms. Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 83 And so, since all the world is dependent upon a successful and self-sustaining agriculture—which it does not often stop to appreciate any more than does the average farmer feel the necessity for saving and feeding his soil—yet the business men, and the many more we wish to loan us money on farm mortgages, can’t and won’t do it until we farmers get down to business methods. Farming has been said to be one-eighth science, three- eighths art and one-half business. The business man in financial circles is anxious to do business, to loan money, but he wants to know exactly what he is doing and what his security is. When the farmer becomes a business man, as he must, he will manage his farm on business lines with plan and precision. He will know what he is doing and why he is doing it; he will be able to show that his farm is making a clear, clean, net profit each year and that his sole asset, his soil, is being protected, and that its fertility is being built up. Then the farmer, as a business man, can go to the financial business man and get any financial accom- modations that he could ask. Not alone that, but the financial man would be delighted to loan on such farm security, for it is absolutely the best and safest of all. We must have business methods—permanent and purpose- ful methods—on the farm, not alone to hold our own, but to get financial help. This being understood, and being a condition precedent, how is farm financing of the future to be conducted for the farmer’s best interest when his methods and soil fertility are assured? We may learn much from Europe in farm methods and farm finance, for dire necessity has compelled them to have better methods, as it will compel us if we are not smart and sane enough to anticipate the results of present methods. They have better farm financing methods, not because they have better soil or brains, for they haven’t, but they have better methods, and for that reason, and that alone, their soil, farmed for hun- dreds of years, gives twice the yield ours does. They, however, make prompt and continuous returns to the soil, for fertility, or soil reserve, must be built up while the farm income will carry it, otherwise it becomes a dead load for a few years. We know enough of good farming now to double our yields and treble our income if we would but put it in practice. One of Europe’s oldest and earliest methods of farm financing was on the co-operative basis, an organization of the farmers in 84 Missourt Agricultural Report. each community—a combination exclusively of farmers for farm- ers, where, with unlimited liability, they join together, borrow- ing money on their joint liability, as they could not borrow so favorably as individuals. This is known over Europe as the Raiffeisen system, and some believe that such a system would grow and flourish here. It would be interesting to see it tried out, and the result might be beneficial in developing the business ability and vision of our farmers as well as in bringing more favorable financial aid. However, with the independent and individualistic ten- dencies of our people, and the thousands of country banks we already have, I cannot believe this system would appeal broadly to our farmers. In any event, it could not produce, promptly, the tremendous volume of money needed to carry on the im- proved, up-to-date farming we must adopt, and that requires heavy investments in fertilizer, live stock, more and_ better machinery, buildings and other farm improvements. The better method, it would seem, could come from land mortgage banks to be provided by state or federal law, or both, whereby they could be organized and properly regulated and supervised just as is now done with our state and national banks. This is the system followed by the Credit Froncier of France. In the same line the German law of 1899 provided for the chartering of private joint stock mortgage banks that now carry $2,618,000,000 in mortgages, being five times the amount carried by the Landschaften banks organized more than a hun- dred years before. The method under which these loans are made is certain to appeal to our farmers. It is on the basis of long terms with annual payments which, while a little more than a fair interest rate, at the end of a thirty or fifty-year term will pay out both interest and principal. For example, a thousand dollars is borrowed for thirty years at 5 percentinterest. Then by paying, say 2 per cent additional, or 7 per cent, or a total of $70.00 annually, the entire interest and debt would be met in the 30 years. For convenience it would be provided, say for sixty semi-annual payments of $35.00 each. Of the first payment of $35.00, $25.00 goes to pay inter- est, $7.35 to reduce the principal and $2.65 to pay expense and profit. On the sixtieth and final payment eighty-seven cents pays the interest, $31.48 pays the last of the debt and $2.65 the Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 85 last of the expense, etc. This plan, now so generally in use in European farm and other mortgages, is known as amortizement. Such loans, given for a long period, make the payments so small that any industrious farmer can meet them and, if through any adverse circumstances he should fail in any payment, the local banker could easily help him out. This spreads the pay- ments well into the future, allows more income to be invested on the farm and practically removes all chance of foreclosure. As our farm mortgages go now, they are for short three or five-year periods, which make the payments unnecessarily heavy and concentrated, and as these mortgages are frequently re- newed or re-negotiated, it results in frequent brokerage fees, expenses, etc., to the farmer and annoyance to the mortgagee, all of which tends to increase the rate and expense. Long term mortgages on the amortizement plan, or deben- tures issued against them, by banks chartered and regulated by law would find a ready market on favorable terms, especially as our farm methods improve and investors are assured of the farm’s fertility being properly conserved. As we see it, few of our farmers borrow to improve their farms, as they should if they borrow at all, but they borrow to pay for the farm or buy more land. We must learn to treat well and properly develop that which we already have, and not starve our farms to buy more. Then, too, the landlord and tenant cannot get results or maintain soil fertility with one to three- year leases, which result in robbing the soil. Money borrowed should be more largely for creative or constructive purposes. Our earnings, or rather our farm income, have been greatly increased—in fact, in the last ten years values of farm products have advanced two to fourfold with scarcely any increase in the quantity, the increase in price being forty-seven times the increase in quantity. Few of the farmers are putting much or any of this increase back into the soil and at the same time they are borrowing more money, which goes to show that they are speculating in land instead of feeding the goose that lays the golden egg. Most of the apparent profit in farming has been in the ad- vance in the value of farm land, and some of this advance comes on the basis of the selling price per bushel instead of on the basis of the bushel yield per acre, which is not being maintained. These are the things that the money lender very properly con- 86 Missouri Agricultural Report. siders and that we farmers must consider, for they are funda- mental. Building up fertility builds up the yield. For instance, the profit in a corn crop is in the excess yield above 35 or 40 bushels, for the cost and expense eat up the latter. Worn-out soil and increasing population are the serious questions from a food supply standpoint, but the more serious feature is that our shiftless and heedless methods of farming are responsible for declining fertility and yields. The Illinois Experi- ment Station shows on its thirty-year plots in corn every year a present yield of 8 bushels per acre, with oats and corn alternating 27 bushels of corn; with a three-year rotation of oats, clover and then corn, 80 bushels per acre. The soil and the man on the soil are the essential and final assets of the nation, and when the man has starved the soil until its declining returns have forced an unnatural and abnormal advance in prices, and no part of this advance has been returned to and used to build up the soil, then, indeed, is it time to call a halt. In certain sections of New York State one farm in three has been abandoned on account of worn-out soil, while in Ohio farmers themselves have returned figures to the state showing 141,000 abandoned acres. As showing what a difference in yield may come from seed alone, sixteen Ohio farmers, each on the terms of a contest, selected his best seed corn and one of their number planted each farmer’s seed in a separate acre in one sixteen-acre tract. The soil, cultivation, rain, sunshine, all conditions were precisely the same, yet the yields varied from 53 to 80 bushels per acre. Farm demonstration—the carrying of the new farm methods right to the farmer on the farm—is the most important single feature of all the work to be done, and the adoption of these permanent methods is a condition precedent to all the better conditions and uplift that are to follow—including better farm financing facilities. All good citizens and friends of agriculture should and will aid in the work to build it up and bring it and the farmer and his family into their own. Yet, the burden is largely on the farmer, for he is responsible for his methods and attitude now that the better ideas are at hand. It behooves us all to take up our part in the great work of the redemption of American agriculture so pregnant with results to the whole nation and to the generations to come. Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 87 A NEIGHBORLY MESSAGE FROM KANSAS. (Hon. Arthur Capper, Topeka, Kan.) My friends, I account it a great privilege and honor more than of passing moment to be invited to Columbia to talk to this fine gathering of Missouri people. I come to you as to a citizen of a sister state, but I hope the farmers of Missouri may look upon me not altogether as an alien, for while I live in Kansas and love Kansas—a loyal native son should love his mother state—I have been striving for several years to serve the farmers of Missouri as well as the farmers of Kansas to the best of my ability. Your problems have become my problems, and from a purely selfish standpoint, if no other, I am deeply interested in your welfare and your prosperity, in the agricultural progress of Missouri, in the moral, social, economical and political advance- ment of your people. A generation ago these two states held widely divergent views on many important subjects. We have not always traveled the same road. Let us thank God that day has passed. Today the people of Missouri and the people of Kansas stand shoulder to shoulder for the same ideals, fighting the same battles for the betterment of the race. The two states are con- fronted by much the same fundamental problems. Missouri, the older state with a large city population, has some advantages and some disadvantages when compared with Kansas, a country state with no metropolis within its borders. I say Missouri has disadvantages. I mean the handicap placed upon the moral and intellectual progress by the large city. I recognize the part the city plays in modern life. I admire the enterprises domi- nating such great centers of industry and commerce as St. Louis and Kansas City; I know the great works and I do not deny their legitimate growth, but I also know the city’s slums, the city’s vice, the city’s floating population, the city’s greed, the city’s sin of extravagance and the indifference of the average city man to the public good render the problems of the State somewhat more difficult of solution. I do not pretend to say that the man who lives in the great city is any less honest, any less patriotic, any less loyal, any less a good citizen than the man who lives in the country, but I do say that he lives in a different atmosphere. He learns to look upon public affairs from a different angle; he is more engrossed in his own personal 88 Missouri Agricultural Report. pursuits, and unless he is an exceptional man, he gives less thought to what to do for the public good. So it has come about that we look to the good men and, in Kansas, to the good women who live in the country and in the smaller towns, to lead the way in both moral and economic reform. Without making any pretext to statesmanship, with- out posing as moral philosophers, the plain everyday farmer- American, by an application of everyday common sense and common honesty and common decency to the problems of the states, are keeping the American people in the right track and are keeping alive that righteousness which uplifts the nation. So I am going to talk to you for a few minutes about some of the great questions which the thinking farmers of Kansas are con- sidering, some of their problems and some of the solutions which they propose, in the hope that you may find here and there a helpful suggestion or a gleam of encouragement and inspiration. The ‘present-day problems which belong distinctively to the farmers are many and diverse and every one of them is far- reaching in its effect. Many of them are entwined in the very life of the nation. Bill Shiftless, for example, may think it nobody’s business but his own whether he raises twenty bushels of corn per acre or one hundred bushels; whether he depletes his soil or conserves the fertility; whether he lets weeds take his crop or keeps it in a high state of cultivation. But Bill is wrong. The price of bread and butter and meat and shoes and clothing and everything the American public consumes is reflected by the size of Bill Shiftless’ crop and the condition of Bill Shift- less’ farm. One-half of the state or nation cannot prosper if the other half suffers. So the idea of class in America is in reality very small and is growing smaller every day. I have known very few rich people, and there are very few compared to the large number of us common people that Lincoln loved. Now, I feel it a disgrace not to work or pretend to work at something. The influence of one Bill Shiftless is infinitesimal, to be sure, but a few one thousand Bill Shiftless’ can make or break a nation, and so it is with every problem with which you farmers are struggling. I do not wonder that the farmer occasionally resents the benevo- lent interest taken in his affairs by the banker and railroad presi- dent and editor and preacher and politician, but you must remember that all the rest of the nation depends upon the farmer; all these men who preach at you and lecture you are particularly interested from a selfish standpoint as well in Report of Missouri Farmers’ Week. 89 your prosperity, because their prosperity depends upon yours. So it is not strange that they are so ready with willing advice. I believe your purely technical problems are in good hands. Missouri has a great Agricultural College, so great that when Kansas was in need of a strong man to place at the head of its Agricultural College we came to Missouri and took one of your big men from the place. Indeed, I plead guilty to being one who participated in the theft, for I was at that time president of the Board of Regents of the Kansas Commission, and I am glad to say that we have never regretted the choice we made. Mis- souri has every reason to be proud of its Agricultural College and the work it is doing. But it is not of the conservation of the soil nor of the ques- tion of roads nor of any one phase of technical husbandry that I want to talk to you, important as they are, despite the com- mendable progress we are making in increasing the yield of a field and flock and herd, despite the increased price thereof, measured by dollars and cents which the American farmer has received for his products in recent years. Every thinking man realizes that all men are with the men who till the soil. The Missouri farmer and the Kansas farmer on the whole are doing better perhaps than their fathers did. They are not howling calamity; they are not pessimistic, but they are thinking and thinking deeply on those questions which concern them and their families and they know things are not altogether right. We don’t all agree in our definition of the trouble; we don’t all agree as to the remedy to be applied, but I think we all do agree that there is something wrong with the present conditions and all agree that they can be bettered. In the first place, we have lost a good many bright men and women who should have remained on the farm. For half a century our national system of taxa- tion and our business system has placed a high premium upon urban life and has discouraged farm life, with the inevitable result that our city population has increased in the past few decades far out of proportion to the increase of farm population. And aside from the alluring opportunities for making money, the call of the city is perhaps a wholesome craving, born as it is of the desire for fellowship, for amusement and culture. But the cost of gratifying this desire in the city is very great, involving loss of neighborliness, curtailment of freedom, sacrifice of identity. We read in the newspapers from day to day of the fights and brawls in the cities, of arrests for drunkenness and of 90 Missourt Agricultural Report. murders resulting from drinking; read of the poverty in the slums where children swarm and the display of the extravagance of the foolish rich; we read of the great need for charity, of poverty that is the result of misfortune or vice; we read of the strikes and the lockouts, of oppression of labor by capital, of great accumulation of wealth to oppress.the weak and poor; we see the foolish girls both in the country and in town who, caught by the glitter of the city, flock on its streets, often falling prey to the lust of men who glory in their shame. When we think of all this in the city, can we doubt for a moment that the clean, wholesome life of the country folk is far and away the happiest, the most useful life? We must, therefore, from a technical and moral motive do everything possible to keep our people who live in the country, in the small towns, from rushing into the already overcrowded cities and becoming consumers instead of producers. We must do everything to keep the best brains of the nation where the best brains originate—on the farm. They will not be wasted there—and there is just one way in which this can be done, and that in my judgment is this: Give the farmer and his family economic justice and the problem is solved. The bright lights and the gay white way lures a few, many perhaps, to the city; the desire to wear a stiff collar and keep the hands clean is the motive of some; the expectation of escaping hard work attracts a few foolish ones, but the vast majority of those people who leave the farm and go to the city, and the vast majority of emigrants who take up the city life instead of the country life, do so because they believe they can make more money in the city; they believe that there are bigger opportunities for them in the city. If we expect to keep them on the farm we must not only show them the opportunities which already exist, but we must see to it that the farm opportunities are in reality as great as those of the city. We must see to it that the city man has no unfair or artificial advantage over the farmer. Let the farm- ers of Missouri and Kansas get a hundred cents on the dollar for all they produce and they will make country life attractive without any commission to show them how. Give them the money and they will need no guardian to show them how to spend it. Asa matter of course, this cannot be accomplished in a day or in a year. Our whole system of distribution must be readjusted in some way before the farmer will attain economic Report of Missouri Farmers’ Week. 91 justice by co-operation, and organization is the watchword of American advancement, and the farmer must come to it. The farmer buys of organized trusts and sells to organized ‘middlemen, and if the farmer is unorganized how can he hold his own? Organized as effectively as the American Federation of Labor, the farmers of the United States could dictate the prices of foodstuffs, and, if they so desired, force the enactment of laws that would place them in affluence and work a hardship to nearly every other class of people. We do not want that, but the country people should be made to realize that in union there is strength and they should get together for their mutual benefit. Why is it that the rural organizations are so rare a thing that a man doing really effective work is regarded as something very much out of the ordinary? Every city has its commercial club, every village has its improvement association. Is the farmer with his broad acres, his investment totaling many thousands of dollars, and his operation sometimes running into tens of thousands, less of a business man than the men who sell a few dollars’ worth of goods over a counter each year? It is an easy matter to organize business men of the town and city into one compact body, working together for a common good, if you can show them organization means dollars. Co-operation among the country people means not only that, but broader and better social life and education at home for your children, and I - believe this leaven is working. Wherever you go today—all over Missouri, all over Kansas, all over Nebraska and the other western states—the men and women and children are talking clubs and associations, the end and aim of which are to make life larger and more wholesome. The forces of the countryside are gathering for a great forward movement. Wherever men meet to talk alfalfa and corn and live stock, wherever women sit down for an afternoon, wherever girls and boys gather to contest their corn acres or their cooking or stock raising, there is the comradeship that stirs one as the blast of the trumpet. The future is full of promise of the time when each shall work for the other and no man shall be glad of his fellow’s fall or mishap. So I say the fundamental task of rural advance is local rural community building—the gradual erection of strong communities founded on better farm practice, securing a fair profit through better farm business, and growing of mighty ambitions for better farm life. 92 Missourt Agricultural Report. How can this fundamental rural task best be forwarded in Kansas and in Missouri in 1914? First, organize local com- munity campaigns in as many neighborhoods as possible. Seek the formation of a community council or federation, made up of» representatives of all the organizations in the neighborhood that have any interest in the common good—the church, the grange, the women’s clubs, the farmers’ union, etc. Seek to discover the needs of the neighborhood that perchance may be met by the organized forces of the neighborhood itself. Endeavor to make an intelligent plan of operations for improving the com- munity in all needful respects. Second, push the idea of better schools for the country boy and girl, including consolidated district high schools and an agricultural department in the public high school Consoli- dated schools are on the increase in my state, and wherever the experiment has been tried I hear only good results. One such school in a little country neighborhood in Saline county, Kansas, has one hundred seventy-six wagon pupils. They are taken to and from the school in school wagons. None of the hundred seventy-six was tardy last year. Even the wagons, which seem to be the chief objectionable feature, are considered advantage- ous in this respect—that a number of the pupils always ride together. There is less chance for misbehavior, less chance for any wrongdoing than where the boys and girls have a distance to go on foot, by road and across fields. In the matter of ex- pense, I am told the consolidated school costs little more money on the average than separate schools, but the results in every other way are so much better that our taxpayers who have these schools are glad to pay the difference. Farming demands educated men and women. Agricul- tural colleges neither in the classroom nor in their extension service can meet the full need. Every boy or girl desiring the equivalent of a good school education, either in academic or agriculture, should have that training. We are coming more and more to believe that the farmer that can afford to educate his children has robbed them if he keeps their schooling money and with it buys more acres of land to leave them after he is gone. We must work for better rural or graded schools for the benefit of the vast number of children unable to obtain the advantages of a higher education, for more attention to the fundamental and practical in education, for open schoolhouses for the public, and the encouragement of the social center idea Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 93 in every community. In discussing this great educational question I want to say to you that after a long struggle we feel hopeful in Kansas that we have at last destroyed the infamous schoolbook trust—the merciless book trust that has been load- ing us up for years with inferior books at outrageous prices. We have put a stop to this ever changing of books with a law providing for state publication of textbooks and distribution to the people at actual cost. We believe this will supply better books at almost half what we have heretofore paid. Third, we must develop the collective or co-operative method of doing business on the farm. The co-operative plan is spread- ing. It should not be entered upon hastily, but it promises to render more help to the farmer than does perhaps any other one thing. Heretofore the farmer has been only a hireling in his own house; been the laborer who did the hard work, but received only such profits as were left him by his industrial masters. These masters were men from whom he bought his supplies, men who converted his products into secondary form, men who marketed his products, and men who loaned him money to carry on his business and buy food from other farmers while he worked. When the railroads and other commercial and industrial con- cerns borrow money at much less rate and on security that is bound to fluctuate more rapidly than land or live stock, or crop values, it is time the farmer was financed on a more stable and more just basis. The farm credit system of Europe may not meet our needs, but what we have got to have in the future is more stable loan values, lower rates and longer term, co-operative features by which the interest is paid with the principal each time and the loan wiped out by the time the term is ended. I hate demagoguery and would do nothing to stir up class feeling, but the facts in this matter must not be blinked at. It will require only a little thought to show that other interests have prospered in a greater degree than has the farmer who is the creator of the basic wealth. The merchant who sold the farmer his supplies, the grain buyer and the corn buyer and the cattle buyer, and the cold storage plants who have marketed his products, the mills and packers who have converted his product into more finished form, the money lenders on time mortgages who have furnished him credit—all these have taken their tolls, and in nearly every instance their profits have been larger than those made by the farmer himself. It can be shown beyond any 94 Missourt Agricultural Report. question that in some lines of farming the farmer receives only thirty-five cents on the dollar which the ultimate consumer pays for the farmer’s product. If the farmer is to take control of these profit-absorbing phases of his own business and get his proper share of the final consumer’s dollar, to effect this result, it seems to me that our farmers everywhere must definitely resolve upon five lines of co-operation: Co-operation in big supphes for making farm products; co-operation in raising farm products; co-operation in finishing farm products; co-operation in standardizing and marketing farm products, and co-operation in securing capital for making and marketing farm products. You must do those things for yourself. If you depend upon the people in other walks of life to effect and carry on this work, it had better be never undertaken. In every community lives some man or woman capable of leadership who could start a movement of benefit to the whole surrounding country, and the people know who to follow. Leadership is a gift of God. He will hold you accountable if you are not giving your best in service. If our country is worth living in and fighting for, let us love it so well that we shall be glad to accept the charge of citizenship as a duty as well as a privilege and care. It is a business. Give it businesslike thought and consideration. It is such men as you who are most deeply interested in every move for civic reform and good government in the State of Missouri—men who go ahead with- out regard to the applause or abuse of the crowd, men who have the breadth of vision to see the right and the moral courage to do the right, although the heavens fall, upon whom we must depend for the solution of the many pressing problems in our times. I am happy in the belief that the world grows better from age to age. We are nearer the long sought brotherhood of man. Ten years ago the United States was headed straight toward plutocracy, corrupt and tyrannical; today the sun of free govern- ment again shines in radiant promise, which seems almost too good to be true. The Sermon on the Mount, the most brilliant burst of oratory the world has ever known, commanded us to love our neighbors and do good everywhere. The world now at last is beginning to see what Christianity means, that it really proposes to shape the whole of human society here and now, according to its laws of good will and human fellowship. The Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 95 human race is developing wonderfully in charity and unselfish- ness. The percentage of those who are mere beasts of burden decreases. Our everyday acts, our institutions, our laws, our practices, more and more are coming to be directed more truly and unerringly to the ends of justice, equality and real liberty. I am firm in my conviction that never before have the con- sciences of men and women been so widely awakened or so keenly active. I know that the world today scouts at many things which we accepted a few generations ago as a matter of truth. In business, in politics—in fact, in every department of human life and activity—we are establishing new standards and higher ideals. But there is still so much to do. Privilege and privileged classes, the public plunderers, political corruptionists and grafters without regard to party, must be eliminated; we must work for a clean, efficient govern- ment as against selfish partisanship. The cost of government in the State of Kansas, in the State of Missouri, and the country over almost doubled the last ten years. Not only are we living beyond our means, but living beyond our means to the third or. fourth generation to come. This all has to be paid some time, if not in direct taxes then indirectly, and the end is not yet. The whole American Republic seems wild with spending. We are living high, in the family, in the town and as a state and as a nation. If the public money supply was as inexhaustible as air, as so many agitators try to make it appear in urging appropria- tions, the result would not be so serious, but we must forcibly keep in mind that the government of the nation, state and lo- cally has nothing to give except what it collects by taxation, and this burden lies heaviest on the man at the end of the line. As a part of the readjustment or liquidation which the entire business world is now passing through, lower the cost of living and teach us the lesson of thrift and economy in public and personal affairs. It will be to the great and lasting advantage of the country as a whole. The government must stop spending money recklessly and wastefully; expenditures for battle ships, rivers and harbors, monuments, public buildings—in these and almost everything else there has been a shameful extravagance. Congressmen actually have urged, in many instances, million- dollar appropriations just because the graft was to be spent in their own states; have boasted of their raids upon the public treasury, and the whole thing is ruinous, a disgrace and a be- trayal of the public welfare. The extreme has been reached 96 Missourt Agricultural Report. in social public expenditure. Economies on a large scale will be brought about if the cost of war establishments can be cur- tailed and if municipalities and commonwealths will lop off a long list of unnecessary expenditures which make for higher taxes. We don’t want to be niggardly or miserly, but just provide full measure of plenty and stop there. But first of all, drive deeper into the public conscience the determination to make economy, honesty, simplicity and efficiency the watchword in the adminis- tration of the people’s business. We must help to fight for less technicality and speedier justice in the courts; for a system that will simplify legal pro- cedure and make justice free in fact as well as in theory, to the poor as well as the rich; protect the rights of men, lift up the fallen and help the down and out; imprison the big thieves as well as the little ones; impartially enforce all of the laws and insure a greater, larger measure of popular government, of human welfare and social righteousness. We are making too many laws and enforcing too few of them. The courts must reform their procedure, a relic of the Middle Ages, or the people will reform the courts. We must stand for more equitable division of profits on farm products by the elimination of grain gamblers, the beef trust and all other jugglers of markets, the interlocking director- ates and financial pirates who play the watered stock game, so that the producer and the consumer will be in a position to get more and the manipulators less. We must lose no time in taking our prisons and charitable and reformatory institutions from under the control of politics and put them on a broad and lofty humanitarian basis, an honest, well-managed business basis, rather than under the domination of selfish partisanship. No man is more active for partisan administration of the prison or reformatory than is the politician. The professional politician has always been found fighting to maintain the old order of things, fighting to keep out those reforms which surely destroy graft; fighting against the open and above-board methods of handling public business, and they will have their way every time if the apathetic citizen does not wake up. The curse of intemperance must be utterly banished from America. And let me say in passing that, in my judgment, one of the greatest blessings ever bestowed on the State of Kansas, and the law which is doing more to make useful men and women Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 97 and bring prosperity and happiness to our state, is the amend- ment to our constitution absolutely prohibiting the traffic in intoxicating liquors from one end of the state to the other. It has been on trial over thirty years. It has reduced the con- sumption of liquor to the very minimum and has emptied our poorhouses, our prisons and asylums, made better homes, happier and healthier families and brought a higher standard of education and intelligence. It is endorsed by more than three- fourths of our people, and is a portion of the fundamental law of our state nearest and dearest to their hearts. I hope you and I may live to see the day when liquor will be excluded from every state in the Union. The black and damning social evil must be eradicated; the purity of American womanhood must be maintained; the inde- fensible double standard of morals must be wiped out abso- lutely; the exploitation of children in factories and mills must be stopped; and there must be vigorous prosecution for wife and child desertion; must be pensions for indigent widowed mothers and dependent orphan children; especially must our country be spared of war on account of the deplorable conditions existing in Mexico. Forcible intervention in Mexico would mean the raising of an army of half a million American youths at a cost of much more than one million dollars a day, and many lives risked in a bad climate, probably have years of contention, boys sent home physical wrecks and new blood forwarded to replace them, draining the nation’s vitality and increasing the nation’s burdens. Who will call for such a sacrifice? Owners of prop- erty in Mexico, many of them, are mere gamblers on a long chance, big interests which find in war new opportunities for plunder. The real patriotic Americans stand behind their President to prevent this nation from being stampeded into a costly war by a selfish and conscienceless war party seeking some selfish advantage. We have in Washington a President whose expert knowledge of the history of the people and the nation is surpassed by no other statesman; the world has no stronger champion of the rights of man; his patriotism is as unquestioned as Lincoln’s; and his conception of the part the American nation should play in the turmoil of this hemisphere is clear and far- seeing and, speaking as one who does not belong to President Wilson’s political party, I believe such a man should be trusted to do what is wise and right. What the President wants and the A—7 98 Missourt Agricultural Report. country wants is men, strong men, unselfish and broad-visioned, able to help him and his cabinet lead the way. My friends, I have touched upon a few of the many problems which crowd upon us instantly demanding solution. I have abiding faith that the good people of Missouri and Kansas: will do their part to abate these ancient evils, to right these age-old wrongs and put our twentieth-century civilization on a higher and happier plane than any which has yet blessed or prospered humanity; that the misery and suffering of the world may be lessened; that equality and justice and liberty may be found all over this nation and all humanity brought together in the-uni- versal brotherhood of man. And friends, I come here as a faithful native son of liberty-loving, progressive Kansas to join hands with you God-fearing people of stalward, loyal, grand old Missouri, in a solemn pledge made in the beginning of a promising new year that we will live our lives righteously, that we will fight the good fight for human progress and higher ideals and will do our part, be it large or small, to make this world a better, a cleaner, a little more decent, a little happier, a little more God-like. HOW ONE RURAL CHURCH WAS MADE TO SERVE ITS COMMUNITY. (M. B. McNutt, Glen Ellyn, IIl., field assistant of the Department of Church and Country Life of the Presbyterian Board of Home Missions.) Thirteen years ago last spring I went directly from McCor- mick Seminary to Du Page Church, which I served 12 years. It is a country field thirty miles west of Chicago and six miles from the nearest railroad. It is surrounded by no town or vil- lage. The church and manse stand alone on the open prairie. It is one of the oldest churches in Illinois. The people are an average country folk of Scotch, English, Irish and German descent. The congregation was then worshiping in a frame structure built half a century before. It was the old type of church architecture—one room, boxy, straight board seats, small, plain glass windows and with scarcely any furnishings. The church and manse lots, enclosed by the remnant of a wire fence, were veritable weed patches. North of the church stood some old tumble-down sheds, the sight of which made every passer-by shudder and think to himself, “Surely the Lord hath deserted this place.””’ The manse had the same neglecten appear- Report of Missouri Farmers’ Week. ~ 99 ance and everything about the place reminded one of a man who had gone away on a long journey and had forgotten to leave any one in care of his abode. One of the elders, a farmer, had been preaching for three years, or until he died. The last minister had resigned with $400 back on his salary, which amount the church borrowed to pay the debt. No one had united with the church for five years. A club- house has been fitted up in the neighborhood to house an organi- zation that called itself ‘‘The New Era Club,’ but whose chief object and amusement turned out to be dancing, though its ori- ginal promoters had hoped for it something better. Many of the young people of the neighborhood, including church mem- bers, were spending evenings there. The dancing element from the surrounding towns had also begun to frequent the place. The only service the church attempted was to open the doors on Sunday for preaching and Sunday school. Collections were taken once a year each for missions and ministerial relief, and this was practically the extent of the benevolent work. Two-thirds of the Sunday school teachers were members of one family. The three elders were also trustees, and each taught a class in the Sunday school. One of these elders was also a Sunday school superintendent, Sunday school treasurer, church treasurer and treasurer of benevolences. The condition of this church at that time was not excep- tional. Other country churches were and are still in the same plight. Some people were saying the country church has out- lived its usefulness, and that was and is true of the old type of country church. Many such have given up in despair and dis- banded. Many others still exist at the same dying rate. What was the matter with this country church? What ts the matter with that type of country church? My diagnosis of the case is, simply, a lack of vision, and the want of adaptation to the new needs. There was a time when preaching and an occasional pas- toral visit was all that was demanded of the country parson, and the people were thought to perform their part when they went to church and paid the minister’s salary. But it is not so now. What was to be done? Jesus, the head of the church, once said, “‘I came not to be ministered unto, but to minister.’ Believing, therefore, that he intended his church to be a ministering church, I began at 100 ' Missouri Agricultural Report. Du Page with the idea that religion has to do with the whole man—body, mind and spirit; that it deeply concerns his social life, his business lite, his education, his amusements, and every- th ng else that pertains to man’s well-being. I was brought up in a country church and the idea I got of it in my boyhood was that the church is a sort of a Sunday affair, which dealt exclusively with men’s souls and good clothes. It was also a place of long faces, for if there was any hilarity among the boys at “‘meetin’,’’ we could always depend upon the hazel brush being brought out when we got home; a place where dead men’s bodies were carried, as the funerals were invariably held in the church. Well do I remember also how fearful I was of the preacher when, clad in his long black broadcloth coat, he would make his annual visits to our home. Two men I greatly feared in those days. One was Mr. Matteer, the preacher, and the other Mr. Turney, the butcher. As boys and young men we never associated our good times with the church or the minister— except the annual union Sunday school picnic, which was really a delightful occasion. The church did not seem to have much to do with our daily lives, or our occupations and amusements. It demanded nothing of us, apparently, but to go to church and sit still. Our companionships were outside of and independent of the church. It was the day of the husking bees, the apple- cuttings, the sugaring-offs and all those most delightful, whole- some and interesting neighborhood pastimes in which old and young alike engaged with such pleasure and profit. What a pity they have gone out of date! It was before the day of com- mercialized pastimes—the amusement parks, the public dance halls, the cheap vaudevilles and the like. It is alarming how rapidly these modern creatures are creeping in upon the country people in these days of the trolley, the automobile and the horse and buggy which every young man on the farm now possesses— even the hired men. It is far easier now for the country people to get into the world current than it was forty years ago. But coming back to the old type of country church, it did not seem to offer us much but a long, dry sermon on Sunday— and it was dry to the boys and girls —hard, straight-backed seats, a book from the Sunday school library in which the good boy and girl always died and went to heaven, and those delightful annual visits by the pastor! Now, I love that dear old country church of my boyhood days, back in the hills of Pennsylvania, and I like to think that Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 101 it did me a great deal more good than I realized either then or now. It might have done worse. And it is furthest from my purpose to speak disparagingly of it or of the dear people who were its leaders. I love them every one. It perhaps served its day. But the point I am making is that’ that type of country church will not meet the needs of the country people today. With these recollections of my childhood and the church, I resolved first of all, when I went to Du Page, that I would get next to the boys and girls; that I would make that old church a great center of attraction. Notice I did not say the great center. I do not believe in the church attempting to do everything or trying to do things that might better be left to other institutions. But I would make it a great center of attraction; a hub of joys, of happy memories and associations for that entire community. I determined, with God’s help, to make it an indispensable institution to every man, woman and child within its reach. One of the good old Scotch elders—they called him “Uncle Dan,” and he was one of the dearest and best of men—put his arm around me one day (it was a way he had of greeting every- body), and he said very seriously, the tears rolling down his cheeks, “Our young people have got to dancing and they are being wooed away from God and the church. How are you- going to deal with them?” I said, ““Uncle Dan, I know from experience that young people will dance if they have nothing better to do. I propose to give them something better.” “Well,” he continued, “‘just before you came here our session passed a rule that there was to be no dancing by mem- bers of the church, but I fear there is going to be trouble when we come to enforce it.” I replied again, ““Uncle Dan, it is impossible to shut off a stream entirely unless you give it some other outlet.” I set to work, first, and organized an old-fashioned singing school. It might have been anything else just as well—a class in scientific farming, animal husbandry, domestic science, or nature study. I chose the singing school because I had some knowledge of music. The idea is to have something that will afford a point of contact between the leader and the people, and also to get everybody interested in doing something. The singing school met one night in the week in the church. There was some good musical talent among the young folks and this new enterprise proved to be a great hit. Out of it grew a good 102 Missourt Agricultural Report. strong chorus choir, a male quartet, a ladies’ quartet, an orches- tra, and some good soloists. Besides, it improved the singing in the church and Sunday school a hundred per cent. We began at once to observe all the special days—a dozen or more. This kept our musicians busy. And the first thing we knew the young people and many of the “‘outsiders,’’ as they were called, were taking part in these special services. They just couldn’t keep out. And, of course, the fathers and mothers had to come to hear their children sing and play and speak, and likewise the doting grandparents, and the uncles and aunts and cousins. and sweethearts all had to come. Next we started what we called a gospel chorus. We got some live new song books and went singing around from home to home. At first some of the people were a little shy of the gospel chorus, but soon they were vying with each other to see who would secure these singers. The chorus went to the homes of the aged who were too feeble to come to the meeting house. It sang for the sick. It sang in the homes of those who never heard any other music. An athletic association already existed. We encouraged the boys in their field-day sports. Two or three baseball teams were organized. We played successfully many of the surround- ing towns, including Chicago. We never challenged the Cubs, but we did challenge a team from the Fullerton Avenue Presby- terian Church, Chicago, and beat them on our grounds one Fourth of July 20 to 0. The pastor of the church had come along with his boys, and he kept insisting that we must have some professional players from outside, but they were just the husky farmer lads. The church building was not suited for social gatherings, so a series of sociables was planned at the different homes. These were not the money-making kind; they were sociables indeed. The older people often attended and engaged in the play with the young folks. Refreshments were served free. At these gatherings special attention was given to strangers and to the backward boys and girls, and a few of us always had upon our hearts those who were not of the fold of Christ. They grew to be a sociable lot of folks, I tell you! They became well ac- quainted. And such fellowship! Such friendships! Such com- panionships! And all centering around the church. I shall not have time to describe the various activities that have been carried on in connection with the church, but shall Report of Missouri Farmers’ Week. 103 tell only of the work of the boys and young men, because the difficulty in many churches seems to be to interest and hold the young men and boys. A young men’s Bible class was organized. It grew until it had nearly fifty members enrolled. This class met with the Sunday school for Bible study. Bible study was emphasized above everything else. But we believed in doing the Word as well as studying it. So a monthly meeting was planned for social service. The first Tuesday night in every month would find the young men at the kirk. This meeting was opened with a devotional exercise. Then a musical and literary program followed. They debated a great deal. Papers were read and talks made on agricultural topics, current events and various subjects, some of which were of special interest to young men. Once in a while the class would organize itself into a moot court and try some fellow for some mischief with judge and jury and all the various court officers. The boys were getting a lesson in civil government here, you see, as well as having a good time. Sometimes they would have a little spread of some kind for the sake of good fellowship. It is a great thing for young men to break bread together under this kind of auspices. One of the things we emphasized a great deal in these meet- ings was extemporaneous speaking. J am convinced more and more that right here is where our farmers as a class have lost out in times past; they have not learned how to talk up their case. The lawyers and the politicians and the business men who have learned to talk have gotten into the offices and responsible posi- tions and they boost their business and make laws to suit them, but they neglect to talk up the farmers’ business or to make laws to benefit them. I have been told that in the Congress before the last there was only one farmer—that is, a real farmer that actually makes his living by holding the plow handles or driving his own team. Of course, there are plenty of “cavalry farmers” in Congress, as they call them down south, but only one real farmer. There is not the representation of farmers in our state legislatures that there ought to be when we come to consider that nearly the half the people of the nation are engaged in agricultural pursuits. This extemporaneous speaking is developed in a_ very simple way. About five of the men are called to the platform every night and are given a topic, something we are very sure they are familiar with. This is important. The speakers must 104 Missourt Agricultural Report. first know something to talk about before they can talk. Then they are expected to speak on these topics. They begin it with fear and trembling. I have seen them sweat at this as much as they ever sweat in the hayfield. But it is wonderful how they develop in this work through a period of years. As a result of this training there are a number of young men in the community who are good public speakers. Now these young men utilize this speaking talent in various good ways. For instance, two of them posted up on some crooked work which a notorious politician had been doing there, and went to the town meeting on election day a year ago last April, and by their knowledge of parliamentary law and their being able to talk and think on their feet, exposed that man’s crooked work in such a way that it resulted in defeat, the first time he had ever been defeated in that township at an election. So you see how it worked out for cleaner politics and a better type of citizenship. Again, the young men’s Bible class has held what they call open-air gospel and song services in a grove in the summertime and in the public schoolhouses in winter. These meetings have been a great blessing to the young men as well as to those to whom they minister. In the pastor’s absence on Sunday his Bible class has frequently taken charge of the service, three or four of the members giving short gospel talks. The young men conduct a lecture course, not for pecuniary profit, but for the sole and only purpose of furnishing wholesome entertainment for the community. We have had some hundred- dollar attractions. The enlire community patronize this lecture course without exception and regardless of creed. The Catholics and the German Lutherans attend. People from the surround- ing towns are frequently seen in the audiences, driving some- . times ten miles or more. Another enterprise which the young men’s Bible class has introduced and supported is a bureau of publicity. The boys invested in a small printing press. They, with the assistance of the pastor, do all the church printing and issue a local church paper. You are wondering what became of the dancing? Well, they forgot all about it in about two years, and there has not been a dance in the New Era hall for over eight years. The build- ing stands idle and is crumbling to ruin. ‘The pastor never men- tioned dancing in the pulpit or to a single individual in private. It was simply starved out. 3 Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. ~ 105 The pledge system of finance has been introduced for the local work and for benevolences as well. Our ideal is a pledge from every man, woman and child. We have devised an en- velope for making payments which answers all purposes. by: H. G. Windsor, Boonville. “It was a very difficult task to judge the many excellent hams exhibited at the show. Many were so nearly alike in flavor that it was almost impossible to detect a difference. In order to decide we had to reject many excellent hams, some on account of being improperly trimmed, some on account of being too fat, others for not being cured enough. We especially desire to commend ham No. 18, entered by James Bachler, Frederick- town, for the amount of good meat, good color, nice trimming Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 129 General view of ham section of the show. Fourth and fifth hams, bottom row, are almost ideal in shape. and good taste. This ham would have been awarded a pre- mium had it been more thoroughly cured. Ham No. 5, awarded first premium, was excellent in flavor, but had hardly been smoked enough, and the trimming was not just correct. Ham No. 4, awarded second premium, also lacked somewhat in amount of smoke. Ham No. 22, while a very excellent piece of meat, was somewhat lacking in flavor. Some of the hams after the meat had been cut for inspection of judges. ‘The bacon entries were very much lacking in quality as compared with the hams. The show thoroughly demonstrated the fact that the average farmer knows a great deal more about making good hams than he does about making good bacon. Considerable education along this line is needed. After passing upon the bacon entered awards were made as follows: Entry No. 9, first, $25; entry No. 8, second, $15; entry No. 7, third, A-9 130 Missourt Agricultural Report. $10. On examining the books, the same as after the awards had been placed on the hams, we found that the prize bacon was owned by the following parties: No. 9, James Bachler, Fred- ericktown; No. 8, Walter J. Bachler, Fredericktown; No. 7, A. J. Caldwell, Columbia. Practically all of the bacon entered in the show was too salty, and much‘of it was not in reality bacon at all, but salt pork. First, second and third prize bacon. “We commend the Missouri State Board of Agriculture for having last year inaugurated the first show of the kind ever held in this country under State auspices. There is great need for such a show and for further educating the farmer along these lines. Werecommend unqualifiedly that this show be continued from year to year, and urge upon the farmers of the State to take advantage, not only of the chance to win premiums, but to learn more of the principles of meat making such as were brought out in this show. It is our belief that it would be well to have two classifications for hams—one for what is commonly known as old hams, cured the previous year; the other for hams more recently cured. We believe that in another year there should be additional classifications, including shoulders and country Report of Missourt Farmers’ Week. 131 sausage, and that similar awards, or awards in keeping with the judgment of the Board, should be offered.” Missouri is the first State in the Union to take up in such a practical way the matter of increasing the interest of the farmer in the home curing of meat. The State Board of Agriculture has issued three bulletins on this subject, and has held its second ham and bacon show. Several other states are following Missouri’s lead, and some of these have conducted shows pat- terned after that put on by Missouri during the winters of 1913 and 1914. It is hoped and believed that the Missouri show may be one of the permanent and valuable features of Farmers’ Week. L | Si | Section of the bacon show. From reader’s left to right, second and third pieces in top row. first and fourth in middle row, and second, third and fourth in bottom row are good shapes. Sides should be split, not left large as was first piece in bottom row. Missouri Country Life Conference. OFFICERS. President—Paul Culver, Gower. Vice-President—H. E. Books, Fulton. Secretary—W. L. Nelson, Columbia. Treasurer—M. F. Miller, Columbia. REPORT OF SECRETARY. (R. H. Emberson, University of Missouri, Columbia.) During Farmers’ Week, 1913, the Missouri Country Life Conference was organized. The expenses of this conference and also those of the 1914 meeting were met by the State Board of Agriculture. At the first conference no roll of paid-up members was started, but the interest was such as to justify making this organization a permanent one. During the first conference the sessions were held in the Young Men’s Christian Association building. The second conference was held in the main auditorium of the University. The attend- ance was the largest of all the Farmers’ Week meetings. Meet- ings were held in the afternoons of January 13th, 14th, 15th and 16th. Now anybody that knows anything at all about it knows that that is not true; that bankers do lend many men with good standing what money they need to feed cattle, often it being the case that the banker has to borrow money from another bank in order to accommodate such a customer. But the bankers do not lend farmers money with which to breed cattle, and until more farmers breed cattle they never relieve the cattle shortage. The farmers quit breed- ing cattle for the reason that it was not profitable. This is the only reason; it cannot be figured out any other way. We must bring about a condition that will make the breeding of beef cattle profitable. If the banker lends this money to a young man, a beginner on the farm, lends him this money with which to buy cows, who gets it? Tom, Dick or Harry? No. (Maybe Abraham, Isaac and Jacob could, while maybe giving too much consideration to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and not giving enough consideration to Tom, Dick and Harry.) When a man makes an application for a loan it will be my business as a county man of Pettis county to investigate that fellow, see what he is doing, how he farms, whether he farms mostly in town or out in the country. If he farms mostly in town he is counted out at once; if he is not industrious he is counted out, and if he “‘boozes’’ just a little he is counted out. It will be my business to help him in handling his farm in a right manner to get enough feed out of it to feed his cattle. The bank takes the mortgage on the cows with their increase for three years’ time, and at the end of three years, under reasonable manage- ment, the increase will easily pay the bill. We put the young man on the farm breeding live stock, growing cattle on the farm, and you cannot point to a man in this country that is growing a good bunch of cattle on his farm and not making his farm better while doing it. These are practical problems that we are trying to work out. This institution has been hammering away for years and trying to drive home the same ideas. Bankers dis- like long-time loans for the chief reason that in the past a panic Missourt Country Life Conference. 219 occurs once in a while, and when such does happen the banks can realize on short-time money when they could not do so on long-time money. If we could bar the possibility of panics it would relieve this condition and make long-time money possible. At the foundation of making things in the country or life in the country worth while, we can trace it back possibly to one word, and that one word is “Citizenship.” I repeat what I said today that a high quality man and a low quality soil cannot live together. The soil will make the man poorer or he will make the soil richer; they will eventually get together. That is one of the things now that I have been trying to bring about by hobnobbing with the bankers, realizing the fact that if we can make it possible for the boys of the State of Missouri to begin farming in a profitable way, and when those boys eventually have the home paid for we will have a citizenship in Missouri that is well worth while. If every man on every farm and every man in every town was the owner of a home, and one that was reasonably good at least, I believe that our hardware stores would not carry padlocks in stock unless some outsiders came in. It might be that some of the ““Quo Vadis Club” would hap- pen along. The means by which we are trying to accomplish other things is through school and through organizations of various sorts. Just one or two of the things now by which we have to popularize our work. There is the farm adviser—that is what they call him; I wish we had some other name, and while I think of it, I did hear another name for him. Some fellow said he was “‘a nuisance.” So they can take it as they please, but the people that we have served possibly would not be satisfied to give us that title. I am going to give you one or two illustrations of some of the things that we have to do, and the man will make good on that work in proportion to the number of places that he can see where he can render efficient service. If he cannot see where service can be rendered, he will fall down on the job. A little while ago a man was taking me through the country; we were making soil tests on several farms that day in the neigh- borhood. I was to make a talk at a meeting that night. He said, “I have to stop at one of my neighbors down here; he don’t believe in you’?—and by the way, they don’t all believe in me over there. I have some very much appreciated objectors. And who don’t? If you do something, somebody will kick you; if you don’t do anything they will kick you. There is only one 220 Missourt Agricultural Report. place that you can go that I know of to keep from being kicked— and that is to your grave. So that the enemies that we have to overcome, not the enemies to the individual but the enemies to the proposition, and I think just as much of that man who objects to that proposition as the man who accepts it; he has just as much a right to his opinion as I have to mine. I respect the man, no matter what his belief may be, if he plays fair or fights in the open, and that is what a good many of our Pettis county friends did. Among the best farmers over there many of them objected to the proposition in the beginning, but they fought in the open; they investigated the matter, and today they are among our very best supporters and friends. When we drove to the farm I spoke of a moment ago my friend said, ““That man will not do you any harm, but he don’t believe in you.” I said, “‘I will not get out of the machine until invited.” But presently the man came down and asked me if I thought he had any soil that would grow alfalfa. I knew by his look that he did not want to grow alfalfa, had no faith in it, and I said, ‘Well, I doubt whether you have. It looks to me like this farm is pretty badly worn.” I told him if he would like for me to make an examination of the soil I would be pleased to do so, and that up yonder on the hill looks to me like the only place that might be reasonably sure of growing alfalfa. I made the soil test and while we were at work he asked, “‘Are you an orchard doctor?’ ‘“‘Oh,’’ I told him, “‘Not much of one, did not know much about it.” ‘Well,’ he said, “I am having some orchard trouble.’’ I said, ‘““Maybe I can help you. Let us go down there.’’ He said, ‘““My trees seem to be dying on one side.’ I knew at once what the trouble was. We walked on and I saw one tree a short distance ahead of me that was a nice looking tree. Before we got to it I took my knife out of my pocket. The farmer had not observed that the bark was dead, but I had; I had seen too much of it. I took my knife and cut down a slice on each side and that piece of bark fell right down to the ground. By spring you would perhaps see that bark drop off of the tree. I told him what it was, how serious it was and what to do for it, but pointed to another tree. ‘“‘Now,’’ I said, ‘that other tree did not die from this cause. That tree leafed out nicely last spring, had blossoms on it and a certain amount of fruit, but within sixty days was dead.” I said, “You cut some bark down on that.’? When he put his knife into the bark and cut it down the dust almost flew into his eyes. He Missouri Country Life Conference. 22 found it completely tunneled out under the bark. I called his attention to the little holes in the bark as though the bark had been shot with fine bird shot. I told him that those holes were where the beetles had come out and gone to other trees. I said, “If, when you saw that tree dying, you had cut it down and burned it all you would perhaps have saved trouble this spring.” We talked on a little while and I dare say that he was my friend when I left. I had performed a real service for him. Another man called me in as I was going by one day and said, “I want you to look at my orchard. I don’t know what is the matter with it, but the trees seem to be dying.’ I looked over the orchard, an eight-year-old orchard, and I did not find a tree that could possibly live through the summer—this was early last spring. I explained the trouble to him and explained that no doubt the trees were diseased when he got them, and that if he had understood how to examine that disease he per- haps could have prevented having to take the ax now and cut down the orchard after he had been taking care of it for eight years, cultivating it for eight years, been spraying and taking the best care he knew, but now after eight years work he would have to take the ax and destroy it. Another real service, a genuine service that could have been performed had we got to the man’s orchard in time before the trouble had gone too far. At another place where I was taking dinner one day the lady said, “If you can tell us how to grow just enough potatoes for our own use we will think maybe you are earning part of Voumusalanyes o-- Welly lL said; “Can. you “grow jood:. tops? - She said, ““The finest tops you ever saw.’ I asked the man if he could grow good straw piles. He said, “Yes, fine straw piles. A field looks like it will make twenty to thirty-five bushels per acre, but it does not make fifteen.’’ They told me what their troubles were. I told them what to do. I went away; he promised me that he would do what I told him. I did not see him any more until State Fair and then just a few min- utes, but I asked him if he grew any potatoes (it was awfully dry down in his neighborhood). He said, “I did where I followed your directions; where I did not I did not grow anything. I had never been able to raise potatoes on this farm, while even with this awful weather I had a good crop.’ He told me those were the only potatoes he had ever grown on that farm. So it goes all along; so many opportunities for rendering service. The Hessian fly was reported as making lots of trouble. 222 Missourt Agricultural Report. I had an article in the paper one day and I said that I did not expect to see very much Hessian fly. Some others said that the fields were full of them. I made an examination in several fields and I did not find any Hessian flies. I found several bugs, how- ever, but they were not Hessian flies. One man called me in as I was going past his field, described his trouble, and I thought possibly he had the fly in his wheat, but the examination showed that it was not the Hessian fly at all but leaf hoppers. When we find these in wheat we perhaps cannot do very much with them unless the ground is dry enough to get a harrow and run over it. That is one of the great difficulties with alfalfa. Sometimes the alfalfa is attacked by leaf hoppers; the leaves begin to dry and we believe it to be attacked by disease. Sometimes the alfalfa is attacked by a leaf disease, but it is usually not a leaf disease but the leaf hopper that is making the trouble. We find the leaf hopper does not like to have his back scratched with a harrow. We get into the alfalfa with a harrow and disturb it in some way and he gets away from our field and goes over to our neighbors, not asking permission. In making life in the country worth while, in taking up county work, a man will get along in proportion to his infor- mation, to his sympathy with the work, to his integrity, purpose and ability to get close to the man he is trying to serve. If he can do that he will make good; if he cannot, the chances are somewhat, at least, against him. Another matter that we are trying to take up is in benefit- ing the schools. Our boys and girls need a little better educa- tion today to cope with the world’s condition than they did a few years ago. The country school has not kept pace with the city school, and as a result, when the country boy is through with the little country school we must send him to town, and when he once goes to town—maybe I had better repeat a little story that I heard today; it will take but a moment. The man said, ‘“‘We have only one college graduate living in our community. It is true that we have sent our boys and girls away to the colleges and to the universities, but none of them have ever come back to help us.” I call that a pathetic story. These young people going away to learn of the world and its ways, that they might bring the information that they get in these schools back to the home, but our system of education in the country has made it so that they have not returned to help us. Missourt Country Life Conference. 22s The ideal school—that is, the social center where the mas- ter makes it his home, with a little farm in connection—is where the people have their meetings, and the school is held twelve months in the year. I do not mean that the children attend school five or six days a week for the twelve months, but attend school five days for a part of the year, then during the summer season, while their experimental work is being done, go back to the school at least once each week or two to review the work and look after such things as may need attention. Thus they are taught how to perform the duties that they will be called on after a while to do. Why, I remember one of the problems in algebra. It was about a man on horseback and a man on foot, and a goose. The goose started out along the road traveling, of course, at a slow rate. A while after that the man started on foot. After he had been gone for a while another man started on horseback, going a little faster, and they wanted to know of me, after they had been going a certain length of time, that is, after the goose had been traveling a certain length of time, how far it had gone when the first man overtook it and when the second man overtook it, and how far the first man had gone when the second man overtook him. Well, I expect you could not work that, could you? Icould not, either. I did not want to try very much because I believed it all a he, anyhow. After I had graduated from the rural school I knew a good many things— I thought I did—but I did not know how to feed a calf. I did not know how to feed a boy or a girl a balanced ration. Yet feeding calves and people was to be part of my life work, yet my school had absolutely failed to equip me for that greatest of all things, making a living. Now then, our work in the country and your work and mine will be measured by the service that we can render. It has been my privilege to visit a great many historical places of this country within the last few years, and while I don’t like very much to go to the grave, yet I sometimes make the trip, espe- cially when I can visit a cemetery where great men have been buried, possibly a few hundred years. In some of those burial grounds the marble slabs and the granite ones that were erected have lost their lettering, it being erased by the ravages of time, and on some of them hands that have remembered have im- bedded the bronze slabs and tablets in them, reciting the in- scription that the marble and granite ones bore. I find in every case where such have been remembered they have been remem- 224 Missouri Agricultural Report. bered on account of some special service that they rendered. The service that any man can render is the measure of his suc- cess. It matters not whether you be a leader or a follower; it makes no difference whether or not the world looks upon you as great, if you perform the duties that you have assumed to per- form and do your level best. For such service, I believe, the final reward is great. If you fulfill that duty that you have assumed men may not call you great—that matters not—but after a little while the accounts will be cast up and you will be looked upon according to the service you rendered. We some- times in making this illustration refer to the stoker who puts the coal in the furnace that drives the great wheels that sends the great ship across the mighty deep, bearing the captain of the ship and the cargo of human life across the sea. If that man who is feeding the furnace is doing his level best every day, per- forming the duties that he has assumed, and the captain of the ship is doing his level best every day, their reward will be great. The trackwalker walking along the railroad to see that every spike is in place, every tie sound and every rail without defect, the integrity with which he performs that service renders safe the human life that passes over the rails. The railway presi- dent surrounds himself with men of ability, men of integrity, who perform their duties the very best they know. In other words, all these men are doing their level best every day, because on their efforts and on their work depends the measure of the safety of the human lfe that passes over the road. I don’t know what you may think about it, but I believe when the stoker at the furnace and the captain of the ship, and the track- walker, and the railway president have passed over The Great Divide and are standing side by side to be weighed in the balance of God’s Eternal Justice the beams will swing equal. Missourt Country Life Conference. DPA ADDRESS BY W. F. HUPE. (Mr. Hupe is superintendent of schools in Montgomery county and is a real leader in Agri- cultural and country life work.) I came here to make a great speech, but now I can’t do it. You will know I had a great speech when I tell you that Mr. Wright stole it and delivered it just now. In the second place, I am informed that I am limited to five minutes when I expected to use fifteen minutes. So I shall have to hurry and touch only high places. When I used to sit in this audience as a student, when I attended school here, I longed for the time when I might have the honor of standing on this platform or speaking from it. Wice’! Hue Now when I have the privilege I am afraid to get up there. I wish I did not have the opportunity. It seems to me that this problem of rural life improvement which we are discussing this afternoon is largely one of education —education through the schools. I do not want to repeat Mr. Wright’s speech, but I do want to suggest just one or two things in connection with it that he may have left unsaid. In the first place, it seems to me, as he has already so forcibly argued, that we need a change of ideals, need to hold up before our boys and girls different ideals. We have held up long enough the ideal of the president, the governor, the states- man, or the doctor or the teacher, or of the lawyer, as Mr. Wright said, but we have left unsaid, untaught, those things about the country men who were just as great as our presidents, or our governors or our statesmen. We need to teach in our schools, in our rural schools, something about the things that surround the boys and girls on the farm—some of the things that savor of the country life and country interests. And the boy or girl that learns to interpret the grass that grows in the’ field, the flower that grows by the wayside, or the trees that grow in the forest, has learned a lesson that is no less valuable or no less important than the solution of a mathematical prob- lem, so far as his or her well-being and happiness is concerned. A—15 226 Missourt Agricultural Report. So I say we need a change in ideals. We need ideals of the happy, thrifty farmer and happy farmer’s wife. We need to teach the boys and girls the idea, the truth, that the man who improves the farm, the soil, and makes it more productive, is no less a benefactor, is no less great, is no less happy than the presi- dent or governor or statesman or the professional man. We need to exalt country life by giving it proper interpretation. To bring that change about we need two things; I think we need, first, a change of textbooks. I mean we need to change the matter and nature of our textbooks and put in them some things that pertain to and teach of country life and things in the country. Our teachers:are sent out to teach, and we superin- tendents and institute lecturers urge them to teach agriculture and the things that are vitally connected with country life, but we place textbooks in their hands and expect them to teach those textbooks which have little or nothing of that na- ture. And that is why so many of our teachers, especially young teachers, fail to teach the things they ought to teach, and the things that will make boys and girls love the country and coun- try life, and that will tend to keep them on the farm. Another thing we need is—well, I think the Legislature ought to give us a law fixing a minimum age of 20 years for school teachers. I think the time has come, or it has been all the time, when children should not teach children, should not teach school. Then the rural school should be a school for country boys and girls and not a school modeled after a city school. The rural teacher should be a teacher specially trained and educated for teaching in the rural school; not less educated than the city teacher, but if any difference, better educated, more extensively educated and along somewhat different and more numerous lines. Time fails me to elaborate on this as I should like, but sum- ming up, I would say that we need for our rural schools, in order to bring about the needed improvement of country life, first, a textbook reform; second, a special rural teacher; and third, a special school properly equipped for the country boy and girl. Rural education should be such as will enable our boys and girls —the future farmers—to see in the hogs and sheep and cattle they raise and work with and sell more than the mere dollars and cents they represent, to see something of the wonderful beauty God has placed in these animals. Then, too, the rural school should train the boys and girls to see and appreciate and love Missourt Country Life Conference. Diver the wonderful and magnificent beauty that spreads all about them on the farm and in every country place. The farmer whose training is such as enables him to see and love and appre- ciate this beauty and glory will love the country. Drudgery will be removed from his work, his life will be wonderfully en- riched, and he will be inspired and enabled to make the country and country life more ideal. WORK THROUGH THE GRANGE. (Mrs. James N. Hutchison, Johnson county, Mo.) Mrs. Phillips was asked to talk on what we have been doing along the line of high school improvement. I hardly know what else to speak of unless it be of our work through the grange. Our community is not so much unlike other communities because we have just about the same kind of people; some of them are poor, some of them are in good circumstances, but we have none that are rich; and we have the educated and the un- educated. The uneducated, I believe, are in the majority, and they realize what they have missed. Seems like they are more determined to put something before the younger generation that . will better fit them for life and make them better satisfied. Now, of course, Johnson county is very proud of all that has been done for them. We are glad of all this and still we are not satisfied with ourselves. We want to push on and do much better things than we have been able to do so far. Our grange was organized last December with about twenty- five charter members. As summer came on the attendance dropped. There was so much work for the farmers that they were not able to do very much in the grange until this winter. Now it seems to be taking on new life and we are adding two, three, four and sometimes five members at a time. Our programs have varied so as to suit each member, the old and the young, the men and the women. We are taking up the things we are interested in out there and things to connect us with organizations that are trying to help us. Its interest, I think, are broader and the organization stronger because com- posed of men and women both. While the women are doing a great work, they have the co-operation of the men, and the interests being united, there is more of strength. The women manage these things, but have to call on the men for money 228 Missourt Agricultural Report. when they get ready for their ice cream suppers and other money- making activities. So I think it is strengthened in that way, and that is the way to get the good out of the union of the two in our programs. This is an old organization, and I am sure most of you here know better what has been done for the farmers than I do. We hope that through our work the community may be made stronger and country life more attractive. I want to tell you a little of what we have done in the way of improvement in our high school. We have put a stove in the hall above for entertaining our friends, where our socials are held and where fellowship is fostered. Then we have put shades at the windows and made other little improvements. Our activities, too, have also taken form along other lines. We have decided to have a declamation contest in the township between the eleven districts, and are offering a gold medal to the winner. This is to encourage work to which but little atten- tion has been paid. WOMEN’S CLUB WORK IN THE COUNTRY. (Mrs. Ivan Phillips, Kingsville, Johnson county, Mo.) I have been asked to tell you briefly something about development in our community. I think this comes to me by our having Professor Emberson out there last summer to dedi- cate the new high school building. I will tell you first just a little bit of how we are situated. Jackson township is in the extreme northwestern portion of Johnson county. It is nine miles square and the nearest rail- road is four miles from the southern boundary. On the north, eight miles from the boundary, is another railroad. We have no cities, no mines. We are altogether in an agricultural coun- try. There are two country villages; general stores where we may get needful supplies. One is at Pittsville in the eastern part and one at Elm near the center. In 1909 there seemed to be a kind of mania for street fairs passing over our country. It dawned upon the mind of some of our good men: Why not Elm have a street fair. It was considered a huge joke for miles around—FElm with a street fair! But we had that fair, and there never was a movement started anywhere that so drew the people together. The old Missouri Country Life Conference. 229 people were there with exhibits. One old gentleman with some potatoes, a man whom nobody had ever encouraged about his farming, but his potatoes took the blue ribbon that year, and he was just as much pleased as a little child. One had some oats, of course, and he took a blue ribbon. The fair was made an annual event, and by working together we became better ac- quainted. I think, too, it developed in the minds of the older people an ambition for their children that they might learn to do better, to be more than they themselves had been, to have more opportunities. In February, 1913, Mr. R. H. Boston, our superintendent of county schools, called a meeting of the teachers and patrons and the school board at Elm, and at this meeting they discussed, among other things, the advisability of a rural high school at Elm. The citizens were sure it would be impossible to vote this and organize the high school, as the state law required. A few of the leading citizens were not willing that their children, who were just then ready for high school, should wait these two or three years for consolidation, so they formed a stock company, selling shares at twenty-five dollars each. Some took just one share, some took three and some as high as eight. Then one gentleman in the neighborhood who had no children to send to school—he was an old man, his children were all grown and able to support themselves—gave two acres of land to put the build- ing upon, with the promise that when they needed it he would give two more, and I think he will give more. It is not the old men of our neighborhood who are the kickers. It is the man who says: “I went to school so and so, and that is good enough for me and will do for anybody.” Perhaps you have all seen him. Well, this school proposition has exceeded our wildest dreams as a success. The men laid their plans for a large build- ing, well equipped. You know they knew what they needed, but when they came to look at the funds there was a limit, and it was just a little bit discouraging. The men would come home from these meetings of the stockholders looking so blue and say: “‘I don’t know whether we are going to make it go or not.” Then you know the drouth struck us, and it being a strictly agricul- tural district, I think we suffered more, perhaps, than we would otherwise have done. Just here we mothers thought it time for us to go to work. On the Monday after Mothers’ Day in May we met and organized the Rural Improvement League of Jack- son Township. We got the idea from some of our city sisters 230 Missouri Agricultural Report. near us who have civic improvement societies for beautifying their cities. We felt that we wanted not only to plant trees but to grow boys and girls worth while. So we organized this Rural Improvement League, whose object, as stated in our constitution, is ““To promote education, sociability, sanitation and provide attractive environment in our township.”’ Along the line of education we went to work on the high school. Helped with that just as much as we could and, in order that we might get all the women interested, we subdivided the league into clubs composed of the women in each school district in the township. They are not yet all organized, but I believe that we have a representative from each school district in our league membership. These separate organizations are to look after their own district needs. We felt it better to undertake one thing at a time and do that well, so we put all of our energies last year into helping the high school building com- mittee. We installed a Waterbury heating system and acety- lene lights. When we speak of raising this money the next question the women always ask is “How did you do it?’ Well, we had a series of ice cream suppers, and we always tried to make our plans in the work of raising this money help sociability along with it. Of course most of you ladies know how the ladies’ aid societies go about this, and we went about it in much the same way. In the matter of sanitation, we have been trying to look just a little bit more closely to the conditions in our several district schoolhouses. We are planning to do a little bit more for the rural high school right away, and that is to put in an agricultural laboratory. I believe it was Mr. Wright yester- day evening who was talking about the biographical study we get in the average high school. I think we will try to put in a library in which will be found biographies of the men of whom he spoke. Missourt Country Life Conference. Dan COUNTRY LIFE MOVEMENTS IN MISSOURI. (J. Kelly Wright, Farmers’ Institute Lecturer, Missouri State Board of Agriculture.) I am supposed to talk to you on country life movements in Missouri. Since my time is allotted to thirty minutes I shall spend one-third of it mentioning some facts and conditions that exist, one-third in giving the rea- sons for these conditions, and devote the remainder of the time to the remedy. I would like first to call attention to the country life movement in this and other states. Society is today really in the most critical condition in which it has been since the government in the United States began. We are to determine within the next twenty-five or fifty years at most whether or not farm peasantry comparable to that in some European countries shall exist here. I do not think it will ever-exist in this country, but if it does not, it will be because the people rise up in their might and change some of the conditions that have been brought about within the last hundred years and make better conditions, all of which have to be brought about and determined mainly by the country people themselves, or at least by the country people in co-operation with the best men of the villages, towns and cities. Agriculture is the very basis of our Nation’s life. The life of this State and the life of this Nation ultimately depends on just about two things: the fertility of our soil and the quality of our citizenship. As Mr. Jordan said, good soil and good citizenship lie mighty close together. Now if you would just go with me from the New England States I would take you down the Atlantic coast across through the states of Indiana, Missouri and out into Kansas, north through Nebraska, through the Dakotas and on up into Canada. Looking backward, I would show you a train of depleted soils over which our fathers passed in the progress of civilization westward. It is not for us to criticise our fathers because I think they farmed rightly. I think they met the conditions of their times when land was rich and cheap and plentiful; when they had only to tickle the soil a bit with their crude farming J. Kelly Wright. Ley Missourt Agricultural Report. implements and the crops would grow, and when the soil no longer responded to that sort of treatment they had only to goa little farther westward and take up new lands at a dollar and a quarter an acre and repeat the process. Now we find ourselves in possession of the very soil over which our fathers passed in the progress of civilization westward. It is no longer a virgin soil. It has already yielded to the plowshare and to the tread of civilization. Every acre of it has doubled in value within the last ten years. Ona poorer soil we are face to face with the proposition of making two blades of grass, two ears of corn or two dollars grow where one used to grow before, or we can’t make the same rate of interest on the investment that we made ten years ago because our capital has doubled. Our students of political science and political history tell us of many reasons for the downfall of the Roman Empire, the chief of which they claim was political corruption in the city of Rome, but there is a reason farther back than that. If we look over the pages of history we find that there came a time in the Roman Empire when the people lost their love for the soil and the open country and drifted into the towns and cities. The fertility of their soil had become depleted and the quality of their citizenship had declined. Wherever we find a nation with a depleted soil we find the quality of its citizenship declining, and sooner or later it becomes a weak nation. The people in authority in the city of Rome surrounded themselves with all sorts of luxuries. They even sent men out in the country to gather slaves and bring them back to the city of Rome. The people in authority there were surrounded by all sorts of luxuries, the children born to the city of Rome were born to slaves. In telling you some of the facts and conditions that exist today in Missouri I should like to take you from a county seat out along a country road to an old-fashioned farm home. ’Twas a good old home in its day, a two-story log house with walnut weatherboarding without, finished with ash lumber within, two big rooms below and two above with long halls between and a great long ell. Here in this old home not many years ago in the autumn time, when the leaves were red and yellow and brown and gold, there was born a rosy-cheeked, brown-eyed baby boy, and as he looked up into the eyes of his mother, his own reflecting the beauty of heaven and earth, no wonder the mother ex- claimed “Surely you are the sweetest baby in the world!’ And to that mother he was, The days, the weeks, the months, the Missourt Country Life Conference. DBS years went by; toys came into the home, picture books, story books and, after a while the baby learned his A, B, C’s. Then the mother and the father began to talk about the first day of school. Have you ever experienced that first day of school in the country? They dreaded the coming of the day but it came, and the baby went to school. How proudly he walked from the house to the gate, kissed his mother good-by and walked down the lane with his little book under his arm. What did he leave when he left the home that morning and went down the lane to the schoolhouse? He left a home sur- rounded by shade trees and grass and flowers and fields and flocks, just as beautiful as nature could make them; a home in which could be found good books, comfortable seats, good pic- tures on the wall, everything calculated for the development of a baby boy into a truly good, useful and noble man. Now what did he find down at the other end of the lane? A little old, cold, deserted, paintless, weatherbeaten shack of a building in which I am told even the bats sometimes refused to stay; no grass in the yard, no shade trees, no flowers, no com- fortable seats in the house, no pictures on the wall, no books for him save the little book that he held under his arm. Out on the playground he found a group of anxious little boys and girls, some of whom wondered who the little stranger might be. And the little schoolma’am, I am told, imbued with the surroundings of the place, said in the usual way: “Well, what is your name, sir?’”? He could hardly understand it all. Everything seemed so different from the life at home. Somewhere I have seen a schoolhouse like this set on an acre of ground, the building in the middle of that acre. Inside of the schoolhouse a stove in the center of the room and the seats all nailed down, and under the stove and around it a box in which was placed some sand for the directors and patrons to spit in on election day—and the box still waits, like the little boy who had been bad and his mother shut him up in the closet. He was so very still that she said, ““Bobby, what are you doing in there?’ He said, “I ’pitted on your hat, and I ’pitted on your dreth and I ’pitted on your coat, and I am waitin’ for more Spub.2 Tell me, friends, do you have your stove in the middle of the room at home? No, because that is not the place for the stove. Do you have the chairs all nailed down at home? No, A==16 234 Missouri Agricultural Report. because they are not comfortable that way. Then tell me, why should we have the schoolhouse in the middle of the yard, the stove in the middle of the room and the seats all nailed down? Now who was this boy that I have told you about? I am going to name him for you, though I think I need not do so for I think you have seen him perhaps many, many times right in your own community—the average Missouri country boy. What did he go down the lane for when he left the home that morning? You tell me that he went down the lane to the schoolhouse to get an education. What is an education and what is it good for? I do not know what your idea of education is, but I will give you mine. An education is a training for a life work of some kind, the ultimate end of which is the building of a home. Did you ever try to define that word home? It cannot be defined. Home means so much to me. What does it mean to you? To some people home is simply a place to sleep and eat—that is all. Somebody said: ‘‘The world is as we take it and life is what we make it.”’ I say, “The world is as we take it and home is what we make it.”’ “To the teacher life is a school, Life is a good thing to the grafter, But it is a failure to the fool. Life is a long vacation to the man who loves his work, But it is an everlasting effort to shun duty to the shirk. To the earnest christian worker life is a story ever new, Life is what we try and make it, Home is what we try and make it, Comrade, what is life and home to you?” And what will it be to all the boys and girls of Missouri who go down the lane to the schoolhouse that I have described? Do you know that of all the boys and girls that go down this lane to the schoolhouse eighty-five out of every hundred never go to school anywhere else; there they get all the training for their life work, all the education they ever receive right there in that little one-room country schoolhouse. What becomes of the other fifteen per cent? Why, they go away to our colleges and universities and become professional men and women. They will take care of themselves. We need not worry about them longer. But what about the eighty-five per cent? They are divided into two classes: One class become dissatisfied with farm life. These follow their classmates right along to the same towns and the same cities, but they do not go there to go to school. The Missourt Country Life Conference. Dao other class remains on the farm. If one class becomes dis- satisfied with farm life and leaves who is responsible? Do you know that the rural school teachers of this State are saying to your boys and girls, ‘““Pass your examinations, be pro- moted from one grade to the next, pass your eighth grade examination, and get your high school entrance certificate and go to high school?” And where is your high school? Is it out in the country where the boys and girls grow up? Not so. It is usually in some village, town or city, perhaps many miles from the place where the boys and girls were born. Their goal has been the city high school. They have had the same training, same ideals put before them that the fifteen per cent have had. Is it any wonder, then, that they want to go to town to school? Can you see that we are giving a hundred per cent a training that only fifteen per cent use? We teach them in the rural schools the things that will admit them to a city high school. Why? Because we know when they get to the city high school if they have not had the training in those things they won’t let them in. What do they teach them in the high school? The things that will admit them to some college or university. Why? Because we know that when they get there if they have not had the training and those requirements they will not let them in, and every step they go the farther away from the farm they get. It has been my experience and observation, and I think it has been yours, that when once these boys and girls get away they never get back. I would not give a snap for the slogan “Back to the farm.’ Better say “Stay on the farm.” Every country boy and every country girl has an inherent right to just as good educational advantages as have the boys and girls in town. Why do we have better schools in the towns than we have in the country? Simply because the “‘city dads” got their heads together, went down to the schoolhouse on elec- tion day, voted the levy to build the schoolhouse, equip it and employ the teachers. Why did they do it? Because they thought their boys and girls were worth the price. The man who goes down to the country schoolhouse on election day and votes against a good school and good teachers says indirectly by that vote, “I don’t believe my boys and girls are worth the price.” Now, then, are you to have as good schools in the country as you have in town? Believe that our boys and girls are worth 236 Missourt Agricultural Report. the price; go down in our jeans and get the money to build the schoolhouse, equip it and employ the teachers. There comes a time in the life of every country boy and country girl when they realize that they are too old and too big to go to school. That is the most critical time in all their lives. That is usually the last day of the country school. On that day when they have completed the eighth-grade work they pass the eighth milestone, the place where the road forks. One road leads to the city and one leads back to the farm. Which road will your boy and your girl take? If it is the road that leads to the city, to the high school, all good and well. If it is the road that leads back to the farm, will they stay on the farm or will they become dissatisfied and leave? Today we hear the cry in all parts of the State, ““The country boy is leaving the hanna. Not long ago a man said to me: ‘‘What are we going to do to keep the farm boy on the farm?”’ I said: ‘‘There are perhaps a great many things we will have to do if we keep the farm boy on the farm, but there is one thing I am sure we will have to do if we keep the farm boy on the farm—we must keep the farm girl there. I believe if we keep the farm girl on the farm the farm boy will stay.” But the farm girl is not staying on the farm, neither is the farm boy. . There are many reasons why the farm boy is leaving the farm, some of which I shall mention. I believe that every coun- try boy has an inherent right to share in the profits of some phase of activity on the farm. I believe that every girl has an inherent right to wear pretty clothes and look pretty, yet there are thousands of homes in this State where the boys reach the age of twenty-one without having a share of the profits of the farm, where girls grow up and money is no item, and they do not have pretty clothes. Is it any wonder that when somebody comes around and says, “I would not stay at home and work for dad for board and clothes—not very good at the best—I would go to town and get a job,” that they want to go? But I do claim that the man or woman who goes nosing around in the world making other people dissatisfied with present conditions without offer- ing something better has no right to a place in society. If you do not believe that country boys and country girls hear these things, just ask them and see what they will tell you. Missouri Country Life Conference. Dor Another reason why boys and girls are leaving the farm! We are building good roads and we must have more good roads in this State. But where, other than the church houses, out in the open country can as many people be seated comfortably as are seated here comfortably today, to hear good lectures, good music and good entertainment; lectures which the men and women from your normal school in your district or from any department of your University would be only too glad to give if you would furnish them the meeting place and the audience. Again there are farm homes in Missouri that do not bear very many attractions for the good, healthy Missouri boy and girl. You have seen them. The chief reason, however, for the coun- try boy and country girl leaving the farm is that they are edu- cated away. We have in the curriculum of our country school things that admit them to city high schools, things that per- tain to everything other than the things with which they will come in contact on the farm. Consequently, all the result of this and the other things that I have mentioned is that they become dissatisfied and leave. I have told you where they go— to the same towns and the same cities to which their classmates have gone—but not to go to school. Where do they go? Into the factories and workshops to learn the trades, in the stores as clerks, in the offices as office boys and office girls. Perhaps some of the boys go to town to push an automobile for some- body at a dollar and a half a day and spend the money before sunup, or perhaps to become a street car conductor. What do these boys and girls take with them when they leave the home in the country and go to the city? In ninety- nine cases out of a hundred they take the joy of a mother’s heart, strong muscles, rosy cheeks and clear eyes, but ere long they have worked in the hurry and the hum and the hustle of the city, in the places that I have mentioned; that sort of life soon robs their muscles of their strength, plucks the roses from their cheeks and drives from their eyes the innocent clearness which they once possessed. Many country boys and country girls have left good homes with fathers and mothers and gone to the city to work from early morning to late at night for a pitiful sum compared to what they might have received had they stayed at home on the farm and worked just half as hard. Enough, then, for the fifteen per cent who go away to school and for the class of eighty-five per cent who become dis- satisfied and leave. 238 Missourt Agricultural Report. What about the class of the eighty-five per cent who stay on the farm? What are you teaching your boys at home and at school in your community about the different types and breeds and characteristics of horses, cattle, sheep and hogs? What are they learning about the men whose lives have been spent in the development of these different breeds of live stock? As I travel over the State I ask the boys and girls who was called the father of his country? Their hands come up. The father of the Revolution; their hands come up, and the father of the Constitution; their hands come up. But when I say who is called the father of intelligent live stock breeding not a hand comes up, and Robert Bakewell was six years old when George Washington was born. His name has already gone down in history as one of the world’s greatest men. Not a bad thing, do you think, that if country boys and country girls want to study biography they learn right along with the biographies of such men as Mr. Byron, Mr. Keats, Mr. Shelley, Mr. Poe, Mr. Wordsworth, Mr. Longfellow, Mr. Shakespeare, and all the rest of them, biographies of such men as Robert Bakewell, Robert Bates, Amos Cruickshank, the Colling brothers, the Thompkins family and many others, just as truly good and useful and noble men as George Washington, James Madison and Samuel Adams. What are they learning of the different types of soils and plants best adapted to each? What are they learning about the different varieties of corn and oats and wheat and clover, alfalfa, cowpeas and soy beans? What are they learning about insect pests of the field and the farm and the methods of combating them—the corn root worm, the corn root louse, the corn ear worm, the leaf hopper and so on? What are they learning about the insect pests and fungous diseases of orchards and methods of combating them? What are they learning about farm sanitation, care of the health of animals on the farm, con- trol of hog cholera, eradication of tuberculosis from cattle? What are they learning about weed seed dissemination, eradi- cation of weeds from the farm? What are they learning about architecture, the best way to build cattle sheds, mule barns, hog houses, poultry houses, farm home buildings and the like? I could stand here for a long time and continue asking questions just like these, and what will your answers be? My friends, if you do not teach the country boy something about these things that I have mentioned, what in the wide world have you taught him about the thing with which he will come in contact in after Missouri Country Life Conference. 239 life on the farm in his struggle for an existence between his fellows there and his fellows in other lines of activity? Enough said for the boy. What are your girls learning at home and at school today about home economics, sewing and cooking, for example? Perhaps you think that girls should not study sewing and cooking at school. Did you ever see a girl who could make her own calico dress and wear it like a queen and look like a queen? I have. Did you ever see another girl who could put on the finest clothes money could buy and yet would not look well because she did not know how to wear her clothes after she got them? I have. Did you-ever see another girl who when she came out to go to church came out bedecked in all the colors of the rainbow? I have. She looked just like a barber pole. Did you ever go into a home where you found the books and pictures, the furniture and everything arranged in such a way as pleased your eye and went away and said that woman is a splendid housekeeper? I have. Did you ever go into another home where you found the same kind of books, pictures, furniture, window shades, curtains, rugs, carpets and all arranged in no way, and you went away and said that woman is a mighty poor housekeeper? I have. Why the difference? A few people are born with a little better taste in this respect than others, but the chief difference lies not in the difference of their taste but in the difference in their training. Some of our boys grow up in homes where their fathers can teach them the methods as practiced by the best and most successful men of the farm. Some of our girls grow up in homes where their mothers teach them how to buy the goods from which their clothes are made, how to make them and how to wear them after they are made. But there are thousands of homes in this State where the boys and girls grow up and their mothers and fathers cannot teach them these things, even if they knew how, for their time must be taken in keeping the wolf from the door. Can you not see, my friends, that unless we teach these things in the country school we shall continue to turn out of our schools boys who will go out on to these farms to become poor farmers, girls who will be poor housekeepers, boys and girls who will be poor home makers? What are you teaching your girls at home and at school today about home economics, the canning of fruits and vege- tables, home sanitation, the care of the health of those in their homes today and those who may be tomorrow. Not a bad thing, do you think, that the future mothers of this State learn 240 Missourt Agricultural Report. at home and at school, while they are yet young, the care of those who are in their homes today and those who may be to- morrow. Do you know that a very great per cent of the con- tagious diseases that we have come through what we eat and what we drink and what we breathe? Nota bad thing, then, do you think, that we teach our girls at home and at school the care of the food we eat, the water we drink and the air we breathe? Sometimes I hear girls say, “I don’t know how to sew; I don’t know how to cook and I don’t know how to keep house, and I don’t care if I don’t, because I will never have that to do, don’t you know?” I feel sorry for the girl who says that be- cause I know she does not appreciate the fact that woman did not always hold the position in society that she holds in America today; I know she does not appreciate the fact that the American home is the greatest institution the world has produced, that is the home life of America that makes America great in the eyes of other peoples in other lands; I know she does not appreciate the position she holds when she is made mistress over the greatest of all the world’s institutions, ‘“‘“An American home out in the open country.” Somebody has said, “‘There is no such thing as luck. Great things never did just happen. They are always the result of somebody’s hard, earnest work, somebody’s carelessness or somebody’s ignorance. . “There is never a song that the breeze whispers low, There is never a note that the bugle may blow Like the lilt and the croon of the old-fashioned tune That babes on the arms of their glad mothers know; There is never a song that goes to the throne Where angel hosts sing and trumpets are blown, Like the low note and clear That falls on the ear of the baby in arms Like the dear mother tone; That keynote to every home, No human words can reach so high, The sweetest song that ere was sung is By-O-Baby, Bye-O-Bye.”’ Right in connection with this a story is told of a woman and her baby. The woman prayed that she might go into foreign fields to convert the heathen, but the poet tells us that the Lord in answering her prayer answered it thus: “T have many a voice that is loud and strong To speak to the world for me, But no one in all the world to sing a lullaby song To this wee little babe but thee. And the song was so sweet And the song was so soft That the babe on her bosom smiled; And the world that was weary of toil and strife Saw God in the mother and child.’’ Missouri Country Life Conference. 241 Now, my friends, I am not saying that we should teach the things that I have mentioned to the exclusion of some other things that we are teaching. We must have the three ‘‘R’s,”’ ‘Reading, Riting and Rithmetic.’’ They are the fundamental things. Boys and girls must learn these. They can learn their history, their civil government and their geography and their grammar if they want to, learn them just like some of us did; learn to say, “I love, you love, he loves; plural, we love, you love, they love,’ if they want to, just as they learn right along with it, ““I farm, you farm, he farms; plural, we farm, you farm, they farm,’ if they expect to go out into the country and build homes there. Now, my friends, I am not claiming that you can teach the things we are already teaching and these other things that I have mentioned along the line of agriculture and home economics in the one-room school, but I am saying that if we cannot teach them in the one-room school let us, for goodness sake, build schoolhouses of more than one room in which we can teach these things. In the not very far distant future I can see a school- house of more than one room. Near this schoolhouse a dwelling in which the master lives and spends his days, a leader in the community, a leader in society, standing for all that is good and best for the community. Around this home and school I can see ten or, maybe, twenty acres of land on which the boys and girls grow the crops they grow in the fields on their fathers’ farms. Not far from this schoolhouse and the home I can see a church, and near this church a dwelling, the pastor’s home, where he lives and spends his days, a leader in religious work, a leader in society and standing for all that is good and best for the com- munity. ji In many parts of the State today people are talking ““Com- munity life.” In many counties there are already community organizations. My work takes me into many fields; farmers’ institutes, teachers’ associations, school officers meetings and even rural pastors are demanding some of my time, asking that I come to the churches out in the country on the week days and hold agricultural meetings there. Last spring I spent about two months with rural pastors in Callaway county, Audrain county, Ralls county, Pike county and Lewis county. Some- times I find somebody who says, “‘I don’t think the church is the place in which to hold meetings of this kind.”’ Then I say: “Why isn’t it the place to hold a meeting of this kind? There is 242 Missouri Agricultural Report. no other place big enough to hold us all in rural communities today?” If a man can go into the church house on week days and hear there discussed things pertaining to the farm and go back home and grow better live stock (for there is an influence coming from good live stock that we cannot get from any other source), srow good fruit, to feed his boys and girls on (I believe the man who will grow good live stock on his farm and good fruit to feed his boys and girls on will not grow boys and girls that will want to go to war and go to the penitentiary), grow better corn, follow a better system of crop rotation, build a better home, turn out from his home better boys and better girls, to become better men and better women, better citizens—I claim that man has served the Lord just as much as the man who stands in the pulpit. Wherever I have held meetings in country churches a local organization has been perfected. Farmers’ clubs are being organized all over the State. Some of the oldest farmers’ clubs for the betterment of country life are in Monroe county. The north side agricultural class at Paris has been in existence since 1911. This class was organized after a meeting called by Miss Eugenia Schmitt, a country school teacher, living at the time a few miles north of Paris. She concluded that a farmers’ organization or a com- munity organization would result in much good. With this in mind she called her neighbors over telephone saying that there would be a farmers’ meeting at her father’s home that evening. At this meeting an agricultural class was organized. This class met every Saturday night of every week at Miss Schmitt’s home, as I understand, and heard a series of lectures given by Mr. Emmett O’Neal, a graduate of the College of Agriculture of Missouri. At these sessions talks were given by men who lived in the community and had made a success of some particular thing. Occasionally they had a lecture by a man from some department of the University. This kind of work continued for about six months, at which time an organization with officers consisting of a president and secretary-treasurer was perfected. Meetings were held once a week. At each meeting one lecture was given and followed by a general discussion. This work continued until about October 1, 1913, when each member bought a book on agriculture and began a regular study, using the questions furnished in the text. Quoting a member of the club, ‘‘The people in the community are paying more attention Missourt Country Life Conference. 243 to good seed, good farm implements, good live stock and the betterment of home life on the farm.” An offspring of the north side agricultural class has been organized at Goss, Mo. Mr. C. H. Davis was the leader in the latter movement. Mr. C. M. Robinson, who was for ten years with the Bar- num & Bailey Circus and who now lives several miles west of Paris near Welch, has organized a club in his community. This club meets every Friday night at his home. Every year he holds a country fair and sees to it himself that the prizes are provided. I am told that aside from Mr. Robinson and his son there is not another member of this club that ever saw the University. I say this because I believe that the solution of a better country life will in general be worked out by country people themselves in co-operation with the people of our towns and cities. Over in Lewis county the Reverend Roy Piper has per- fected a farmers’ organization at his church at Ben Bow. These are some of the things that they have accomplished and some of the things that they hope to do in the future. Through Mr. Piper’s leadership a new lighting system has been put in the church. New furniture has been installed and a concrete walk put in, the money being collected from voluntary subscriptions. Last fall at this church the people of the community held a country life institute. Representatives of the Missouri State Board of Agriculture, extension men of the Presbyterian Church, the farm adviser of Marion county and local people appeared on the program. They expect to make the church the center of all good things, fostering community pride, conserving local tra- ditions and rendering the greatest possible service toward the realization of a better country life. It was my pleasure last spring to accompany Rev. Clair S. Adams, Rev. Horeman, Rev. Alonzo Pearson, all of the Presby- terian Church, and Mr. A. W. Orr, representing the Missouri State Board of Agriculture, to four churches in Pike county, Missouri. These churches were under the pastorship of Rev. Pearson. We held a series of agricultural meetings at each of these churches. As to the result of these meetings I wish to quote Rev. Pearson. In a letter to me recently he says: “I wish to say to you what I have said both publicly and privately wherever I have had an opportunity. The meetings held in the country churches in which you and Mr. Orr took such an active part in presenting matters that every farmer is or should be interested in were very beneficial in many ways. First, they 244 Missouri Agricultural Report. helped me to show to the farmers that they are the greatest co- workers with God in this world; second, they quickened the in- terest of the people in farming, in their farms, in their homes, in their stock, its improvement, care and protection; third, those talks were wonderfully helpful to me in showing the people that farming is as truly the work of God and the farmer is truly the servant of God as any minister; fourth, that the farmer is as much under obligation to do all that he does on the farm for the glory of God as any minister of Jesus Christ in his work; fifth, that no matter what a man’s business is, he is under as strong obligation to do all that he does and whatsoever he does to the glory of God as the minister of the Gospel; sixth, those talks on farming and stock raising in the church in the spirit in which they were delivered helped some men to become inter- ested in the church and the religion of Jesus Christ as nothing in my knowledge had ever done.”’ Each county naturally divides itself into communities. Why should we not have our country life built up by commu- nities the center of which is the home, the school and the church? We talk about teaching civic pride, patriotism, love of God, love of home and love of country. I know of no better place in the wide world in which to teach and develop these things. Out in the open country where the home, school and church are surrounded by grass and flowers, fields and flocks as beauti- ful as nature can make them, with the starry canopy by night and the glorious sunshine in the daytime. Why is it not the best place in all the world to develop true American citizenship? Whenever we build communities like this with homes and schools and churches like these that I have described, schools in which we teach the things that I have mentioned, we need not worry about the farmer boy leaving the farm. He will no longer see in farm life a life of drudgery. He will see more than that. Down in the Ozark country he will see more than just hills and rocks and trees—he will see there God’s thoughts piled up; in the prairie lands of North Missouri he can see God’s thoughts spread out; in the ripple of the streams of the Ozarks he can hear God’s thoughts in music; in the carol of the birds in the springtime he can hear God’s thoughts in symphony; in the petals of the flowers in the springtime and autumn time, in the foliage in the springtime and in the autumn time and in the sunset he can see God’s thoughts in color. From homes and schools and churches in communities like this will come young Missourt Country Life Conference. 245 men and young women who will represent the very highest type of American citizenship, young men who will consider it their highest ideal and greatest service to their State to build a home on Missouri soil, on a Missouri farm with a Missouri girl, who holds American manhood above the mere titles of other lands across the sea. THE HUDSON FARM AND HOME IMPROVEMENT CLUB. (C. F. Chapin, Appleton City, Mo.) Before telling you anything about what we have done to bring our people together and make them of one aim and one mind in our community, I must attempt to take you down there among us for a short time. We are situated in the eastern edge of Bates county and reach over into the corner of Henry. Appleton City, St. Clair county, is our trading and shipping point, and is only a little over four miles distant from our community center—the school- house. It is not one of your old settled and rich sections of the State, such as you have along the Missouri river. The people are just the common, everyday kind. : _We have few of the rich farmers such as you have about here and in many other places. We have but one university graduate in our community that I know of. True, we have sent our boys and girls away to our different colleges and universities, but few have come back to help us in our work after they have completed their education. While the land of our section was entered before the Civil war, there was not much of it settled until the late sixties and early seventies. Then people came in from Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Ilinois—places from which you trace your own ancestry, and of course from that you can tell what kind of people we are. The community had hardly been settled before a school- house was built; a Sunday school was soon organized; even a church was built, only to be moved away when the railroad passed by on the other side. But the Sabbath school was maintained in the schoolhouse until a little over twenty years ago. A denominational church was built. But that did not help matters. Though the Sunday school was kept up most of the time, still there was not that unity of feeling which was necessary to make any community ideal. Such was the con- 246 Missouri Agricultural Report. dition of things until a little over three years ago, when a few of us who had been dreaming dreams and building air castles thought the time had come to do something. We thought that the people were like those to whom the musician had propounded the question as to “Who could play in the band” and they answered by saying, ““Those who wanted to.’ So we thought the time had come for us to try to get together; we thought we wanted to see one another’s faces, take hold of one another’s hands and talk over what we all had in common. So a mass meeting was called in our schoolhouse. A representative audi- ence was present. The advantages and disadvantages of some kind of an organization were brought before the people. It was unanimously voted to effect some kind of an organization to meet every three or four weeks, as thought best, as things progressed. Officers were elected for only three months at first, for it was then midwinter and it was not thought possible to keep up any kind of a farmers’ organization during the summer months. At the first meeting the schoolhouse was well filled with good, orderly people. After a good, social time mingling with our neighbors we had a program of recitations and songs, essays and talks, some by the little folks and some by the grown folks. Some of the essays and talks were upon farm topics and all were by home talent. The program was interesting and the people all enjoyed it. At the next meeting there was a larger attendance. After some two or three meetings there was added an orchestra of stringed instruments. The programs continued to be interesting, instructive and entertaining. At the end of three months it was decided to keep right on during the summer season. But in the meantime the trustees of the church, of which I have made mention, could not see their . way longer to keep up that building or secure the services of any one to conduct religious worship even once in a while. So they got permission from the higher authorities to sell the building. As it lay just across the road from our schoolhouse and could easily be made into a model building for school purposes, the school district bought it and the land with it. Our club then took up its abode in this building and, though we could now seat from one hundred twenty-five to one hundred fifty people com- fortably, still we had oftentimes many standing. In the meantime, a proposal had been made to hold in the fall, sometime after the crops, the corn and the potatoes had Missouri Country Life Conference. 247 ripened, a fall fair and a picnic—a community affair. A paper was passed around and sixty-five dollars subscribed for pre- miums. Premiums were offered to the boys for the best samples of potatoes, corn, oats, Kafir, etc.; to the girls for the best samples of sewing and baking. Classes were arranged so the younger boys and younger girls would not have to compete against the young men and the young ladies. The premium list was printed and one or more copies given to each family in the neighborhood. Everyone became much interested in the proposed fair and went to work in earnest to make it a success. The interest in our meetings kept right on from month to month. Oftentimes we would have some one with us who had heard of what we were doing and would give us a short talk of encour- agement. You all remember that the summer of 1911 was nearly as hot and dry as that of 1913. As the date for our fair approached we would hear that this boy’s crop of potatoes or corn was an entire failure, and that he would not have anything worth show- ing. He was told that all were in the same fix and that the pre- miums had been offered for their encouragement, so that if an exhibit were made some one would get the money. The day for the fair came. There were creditable samples of many kinds of farm products. The girls’ part of the exhibit was just grand, nearly as good as that of most county fairs. Through the State Board of Agriculture we secured the services of J. Kelly Wright, whom you all know, to judge the farm and garden products. Local talent was used in the other departments. The dinner was one long to be remembered, being spread under the shade trees that had been planted some thirty years before in the old schoolhouse yard. After dinner Mr. Wright gave us a talk which benefited all and made the occasion all the more profitable. When in the spring of 1912 we commenced to talk about our fall fair the tradesmen of our town said they wanted to help. One hundred and fifty dollars was subscribed; the premium list was greatly enlarged. Then we had a good crop year. When the time came for the fair we had fine samples of most every kind of farm products that could be grown in our vicinity. F. B. Mumford, dean of our State College of Agriculture, was present to judge the farm and garden products, and it must have taken him nearly two hours to designate where to tie the ribbons. He had time to make only a short talk, but it was much appreciated. 248 Missouri Agricultural Report. There must have been five hundred people present to see the exhibits, to give us the encouragement of their presence and to hear the talk. This last year we held our third annual fair and, though the season was not opportune, we had many kinds of farm products. The girls’ part was fully maintained to its high standard. We had with us again Mr. Wright, and he seemed to appreciate the opportunity to come back to us. The club has now kept up its regular monthly meetings for over three years with unabated interest. After we had been running a short time we met only once a month, and then when the moon gives a good light, so the old folks can see to come as well as the young. Our club has attained considerable prominence through our section of the State. We frequently have some one with us to make us a good talk on some topic of general interest. Among these have been Uel Lamkin of Clinton and Senator Wallace Crossley of Warrensburg and others. Our ministers also have been good in coming out and giving us short talks. Such, in brief, is the history of our Farm and Home Im- provement Club up to the present, but if I am to tell you what we have been doing in the neighborhood to help ourselves I should not stop here. We had hardly got our improvement club well organized and going before the women of our community had conceived the idea of organizing a club all to themselves, a club like the town women have. So one beautiful June after- noon they met at one of our farm homes, about twenty-five of them, mostly married women, and effected an organization that has since joined the State Federation of Women’s Clubs. They now have thirty or more members. They have up to the present devoted most of their study to home economics. They have provided several high-class entertainments for the community, some pay and some free. They have given receptions once a year to their husbands and sweethearts. And last spring, when word was received that the sufferers in the Ohio flood were in need of aid, the club raised seventy-five dollars for them in one afternoon. This was done over the telephone. Now I have not time to tell you about the boys’ band or the girls’ embroidery club, although it would serve to show you what can be done by the young people of any community that is worth while if they want something going on. Missouri Country Life Conference. 249 But I must not close yet. I must speak to you about our Sunday school. It has been reorganized and taken on renewed enthusiasm and vigor such as it has not had for over twenty years. On Christmas Eve the school gave as fine an enter- tainment as I ever witnessed. Again, last spring a few of our community thought the time had come when we ought to have religious worship on Sundays, in the afternoon. Soa paper was passed around and a fund sub- scribed which enabled us to have preaching most every Sunday afternoon by the different ministers of our town. I might go more into details and tell you how our school has been greatly improved in the last two or three years. Last Saturday night the young people of our neighborhood gave a play in our school- house in which the acting was better than ninety-nine per cent of the troupes that go from town to town and make one-night stands. They played to acrowded house, and the proceeds from that play—over thirty dollars—is to be used by the school board for improvements. I have once in a while met with some one from the country who says he would like to have something going on in his neigh- borhood, but that they do not have the working material. I venture to say that many times they are like the sailors who were on a ship that had been provisioned for a long sail. After they had been at sea for quite a length of time a calm came over the ocean. The wind did not blow for days and days. Their drinking water became very low and they feared death from thirst. Finally a steamship hove into sight and they at once sent out a signal to let them have some drinking water. The signal came back for them to let their buckets down where they were. Thinking the signal must have been misunderstood, the second time they sent a signal asking for drinking water. Again the same answer was received. Thinking this would be utter foolishness, a third time they sent a signal asking for drinking water, and again the same signal, for they were at the mouth of the mighty Amazon river and the water was pure and fresh and would quench their thirst. That, I think, is the way with many farm communities. That is why they do not have anything going on; they do not make the attempt, do not try the experiment. Frequently if they will but do as we have, make the test, they will find that people who could not make a speech of two consecutive minutes are later able to make good executive Officers, J thank you, 250 Missourt Agricultural Report. EUROPEAN METHODS OF FINANCING THE FARMER. (W. I. Diffenderffer, Lebanon, Mo.) The invitation extended to me by your secretary to speak before this meeting is considered by me a personal compliment. At the same time, I consider it a great privilege to place before this body a brief, personal report of one who was a delegate on the American Commission that went abroad to investigate agricultural con- ditions in Eurpoe. I had the honor to be named by United States Senator Duncan U. Fletcher of Florida as a delegate at large upon this commission. While Missouri had no legal representative, it was understood that I represented this W. I. Diffenderffer. grand old State. You have already followed the newspaper accounts which stated that the commission consisted of about seventy delegates representing thirty-six states of the American Union who visited eight countries of the continent. The purpose of this investigation was that the American people might be awakened to the general and permanent pros- perity of the state and the nation, a full report of which has been made to Congress, which will be made public. The view ex- pressed by me is my personal opinion and investigation and has no reference to the report of the commission, disclaiming on behalf of the commission all responsibility. In European countries the rural conditions differ widely from those in America. The environment and temperament is entirely different. There the farmer with his entire family culti- vates the soil and gathers the crops. His wife, sons and daugh- ters work in the field. In Germany, I believe, fifty per cent of those in the fields are women at work on small tracts of intensely cultivated land. Every farmer knows the business of his neighbor and his borrowings are common knowledge. The European farmer is a ‘fixture’ on his place, which possibly his forefathers before him had owned and his family expects to continue. I was on one Missouri Country Life Conference. 251 farm in England that had been in one family for eight hundred years. In one case I saw land that had been in use two thousand years, and it is said this land produced more the past year than it did the fifty years ago. This is brought about by careful rota- tion of crops through cultivation and high fertilization. I saw three growing crops in one field—potatoes, beans and rows of grapes—that is, the potatoes were planted between the rows of grapes and the beans were planted in the grape rows, the vine of the grapes being sticks for the beans. The American farmer usually does things on a larger scale and he hires much of his help. He lives to himself. Ina sense he is usually a land speculator, that is, he is ready to sell at a fair profit and buy elsewhere. He has been taught from early boy- hood to avoid obligating himself to pay the debts of another. The Europeans say the American farmer is less of a farmer than a speculator in land. European rural credit systems follow a division of short- time personal credit societies and long-time land mortgage asso- ciations. For short-time credit co-operative societies are formed and in lieu of capital credit is pledged, sometimes with limited liability of its members but often unlimited—that is, when a farmer becomes a member of a co-operative society he pledges his entire worth for the debts of the society. In Germany these societies have reached their highest state of development. Throughout that empire there is one equal for every one thousand population. It is not difficult to determine the financial stand- ing of a borrower because of the simple methods, property assess- ment and title registration. Every farmer is his own capitalist. These short-term credit societies throughout Continental Europe are generally federated. The organizations for the provision of personal credit facilities are as highly developed as are the systems of commercial banking. The prevailing rate of interest paid by the farmers for the short-time loans is from four to five and one-half per cent. The terms offered European farmers are generally better designed to meet the peculiar re- quirements of agriculturists than are the terms obtainable today by the American farmers. The personal credit organizations have the form of co- operative societies. As I stated before, very often the members of these societies assume unlimited liability for the debts of the society, while in other cases the societies take form of limited liability. As a rule, in European countries the law makes little ESV» Missouri Agricultural Report. or no provision for exemptions of any kind. These short-time credit societies furnish cheap, safe and elastic credit to their members by reason of their control by farmers and are organiza- tions exclusively in the interest of farmers, who operate them at nominal cost and without seeking dividend profit to such so- cieties. Land mortgage credit has been organized so as to place a collective security back of bonds issued by land-mortgage socie- ties in contrast with the system of marketing individual loans upon individual mortgages. Without discussing the form of organization employed for this purpose, it may be stated that the land-mortgage institutions bring to European farmers a low interest rate, but not any lower than the short-time credit societies; the privileges of repaying loans in small, fixed annual installments extending over a term of years—in some cases as long as seventy-five years under the amortization plan—although provision for the earlier payment is made if the borrower so desires; protection from advance in interest rates and the prac- tical elimination of commission charges. Many of these per- sonal credit societies and land-mortgage associations are fostered by government grants, loans or special provisions of law. Mort- gage bonds issued by commercial banks and by private joint stock land-mortgage banks sell substantially on the same basis with like securities issued by government-favored institutions, and both classes of banks are recognized as needful in the de- velopment and conservation of agricultural resources. In many instances private and commercial banks purchase the securities of land-mortgage associations. Experience has dem- onstrated that such land-mortgage bonds are liquid assets. The systems of land-title registration in countries possess- ing such mortgage institutions practically prevent dispute of title upon mortgaged land. Provisions are also generally af- forded these mortgage institutions which eliminate undue legal delays in the recovery of loans placed with defaulting borrowers. Savings and trust funds are frequently invested in securities of such mortgage institutions under sanction of law. Loans up to fifty or even sixty-six per cent are made on lands of dependable value, and are considered safe and conservative and compare favorably with provincial and government bonds. The American people are too free and independent; there- fore I seriously question the adaptability of any such system to our conditions in this country, co-operation being the founda- Missouri Country Life Conference. 253 tion of the foreign-loan system, while co-operation among our farmers has been tried often, and, according to my observation, to no great success. In Germany every thirteenth inhabitant is a member of one of these affiliated associations, and while all rural banks accept deposits from everyone, they will only lend to members who are properly endorsed by other members. Savings accounts in both France and Germany far outnumber those in this country, and the rate of interest paid is about three per cent. It is easy to see the source of the money loaned to the European farmer, while in this country, with its vast oppor- tunities for speculation, our people, in a large measure, prefer to do their own investing in land where the possibility of large returns is so attractive. Many Americans have for years advocated the making of farm loans by the government, which is a fallacy. The whole plan of government farm loans or government guaranty of farm loans, as in the case of the Saskatchewan idea, eventually will resolve itself into this: No government can make loans simply because it is a government. No government can rise superior to the economic laws which govern the value of money, and no government can fix an interest rate which will apply on all farm lands alike. To attempt to do this would be to invite disaster. The cry for cheap money for the farmers is largely one by those who do not understand the situation. During the last year it is a fact that farmers in Illinois have been able to borrow money through the life insurance companies at lower rates than ~the big business men of Chicago have been able to secure it. The only reason why more thinly-settled sections have not been able to do this is that the local conditions do not warrant it, and this would be the same whether the government or a pri- vate individual attempted to make the loans. It is my opinion that if we are to inaugurate a successful system of farm credit we should try to forget the methods employed by credit associations in Europe. What we should do is to try to comprehend the principles employed and seek to adapt them to American ideals, customs and governmental methods. What is wanted is some method by which young men who wish to become farmers may offer evidence of ability, thrift and character. There is wanted some guarantee that the money will be used for productive purposes and sufficient supervision to determine that the money will be wisely expended. What is 254 Missourt Agricultural Report. needed is some basis on which educated, hardworking, honest young men between the ages of twenty-one and thirty may obtain a reasonable capital with which to make a home in the open country. What is needed is some method of replacing the opportunity which formerly existed under the homestead act. In endeavoring to make applicable any long-term mortgage system for this country the fact must be kept constantly in mind that the farmer of Europe operates under nominal expense as compared with the farmer in this country, as well as operates on a much smaller scale. The European farmer applies himself to a greater degree and is more scientific in the handling of his land products. While the average farm in Europe is small, varying in size with the different countries, about twice the yield is obtained per acre that is obtained by the American farmer, owing to intense cultivation and scientific methods. The earn- ing capacity of the European farm is an established fact. That in turn establishes its value. So-settled are the values that the basis of assessment for taxation purposes, which is made at one hundred cents on the dollar, is generally used as a basis for valu- ing property when granting loans. Among the most important advantages for facilitating loans on real estate in Europe is the title-registration law which, in effect, places the government behind the title to all property. Some modification of these title-registration laws could undoubtedly be made applicable to every state in the Union, and is highly essential to obtaining cheaper rates of interest on mortgage loans. It must be understood that the method to be pursued in this country under existing conditions, should any long-term mortgage systems be devised, necessarily would be quite dif- ferent from the European methods; the rate of interest to be paid by our farmers would of necessity have to be higher, be- cause of the expense incident to appraisement; because of exemption and redemption laws; because of the general lack of title-registration laws, and the consequent need of abstracting and title examination; because of the necessity of safeguarding the loan by watching the security that has not such a stable or definite income-producing value over an extending period; and for the further reason that a market would have to be built up for this class of investment. Whereas throughout European countries this class of investment is now well established, their land mortgage associations having been in_ success- ful operation for over a century without a loss of a dollar to an Missourt Country Life Conference. 255 investor so far as we could learn. However, I do not believe the need of the American farmer is so much for a low rate of interest on his mortgage loan, if he is furnished a reasonable one, as for a method that will give him a sufficient period to work out of debt by amortization. Through operation of the long-term amortization loan system the European countries have revolutionized the land - ownership, passing titles from large tracts of landlordism into small tracts belonging to the individual farmers, making per- manent home owners out of former tenants. They have assisted in making farm life more inviting and in improving farm prop- erty to a high state of cultivation, thereby increasing the pro- duction of the land and, as a natural result, enhancing the value of the land itself. If it is possible to devise some safe system for financing the American farmer on some safe plan, which contemplates the long-term amortization principle, I feel sure it would be much easier to build up our rural interests, ultimately placing more farm owners on our lands. In other words, if we can make easier the ownership of farms farmers will multiply. We would thereby assist the successful tenant to become a landowner, and the more landowners within a state the more stable and per- manent its population, and the more stable and permanent its population the safer and more certain is invested capital and the happier and more contented its citizens. 256 Missourt Agricultural Report. RURAL SCHOOLS AND IMPROVEMENTS. (C. H. Funk, Johnson county, Mo.) It certainly affords me a great pleasure to speak a word in behalf of the rural schools. We find the little rural schoolhouses dotted all over this country from Maine to Cali- fornia and from Canada to the Gulf. And it is in these rural schools that we have the material in the boys and girls on whose shoulders the responsibility will fall to carry out the future develop- ment of the greatest of all industries of these United States, agriculture. The boys and girls of today will be the farmers and farmers’ wives of tomorrow. First, let us notice the rural school buildings, the greater per cent of which are built along lines that have been handed down for several generations, usually built on straight lines with window in either side, one end blank with door at the other. They present anything but pleas- ing appearance outside, and much less inviting or cheerful appearance inside. They are very badly lighted and poorly heated, and are without any ventilation whatever. Now this is a fair illustration of what ornamented our school site over in Johnson county, a few miles southwest of Holden, until last year. This is the district in which I was born, reared and am still living. The old building had been erected something over forty- two years ago. It was twenty-four by forty-two with four windows on either side. A hall cut off of one end. The build- ing had been formerly plastered and replastered and patched and ceiled and painted until it reminded me of the ‘“‘old colored man’s sock,’ which he said he had worn for forty years. Being asked how that was, he said ‘“‘Missus. footed the leg and then legged the foot, but they is the same old socks.” That was the way with our old schoolhouse. It had been “footed”? and “‘legged’”’ until it was anything but a picture of beauty. Cee hunks Missourt Country Life Conference. PBT There were several fruitless attempts to vote a loan, but they always met defeat until last spring election, or rather before the election, we got busy and by good teamwork got the voters out, and when the vote was counted we found we had carried five to one for the loan. The old building was built entirely of white pine and was all full in measurements. It was sawed in those early days before they acquired the habit of charging up for sawdust and shavings, as at the present day. We first hired the old building wrecked at a cost of twenty- five dollars, the lumber cleaned of nails and sorted and piled, ready for the contractor. For the new building we have a oid concrete wall and cross walls, to support the floor. The house is thirty by thirty- six feet with an eight-foot space cut off of the south end for porch, cloak and library room. This leaves the schoolroom twenty-eight by thirty feet, seated the long way of the room. Heater is at one side, or rather corner, of the room. I should have mentioned that this building has a T-shaped roof, making three gables. The outside is covered with one-inch storm siding building paper and best quality siding, the siding extending down over foundation, preventing water from getting in to rot the ground frame. The inside is patent lath with two-coat plaster work and thirty-inch wainscoating metal ceiling. Flooring is edge-sawed yellow pine, treated with two coats of boiling oil. Library room and cloakroom are plastered, sides and ceiling. Library room is six by eight feet, having one window with built-in book- case, with sliding glass doors at top and sliding panel door at bottom. The bottom part is ten inches deeper than the top, making a convenient shelf. The cloakroom is eight by fourteen feet, has double window in south, and coat hooks for wraps and shelving for lunch boxes. The porch is eight by ten feet and has concrete floor extending over cistern. The seats are the best individual seats that could be bought. We have the Smith heating system, which is guaranteed to heat the room to seventy degrees in the coldest or windiest weather, and it isn’t any warmer for a pupil sitting directly by the heater than on the opposite side of the room. It takes the cold, pure air from the outside, heats it and radiates it through the room. The foul air is drawn out at the base of the chimney, completely A—17 258 Missouri Agricultural Report. changing the air from three to fifteen times per hour, so we have a perfect ventilation. We also-have sanitary drinking fountain, which does away with drinking cups in any way and keeps a good, cool supply of water in the building. In Johnson county there are one hundred forty-five rural schools. Of this number there are but seven modern, five only modern in both building and equipment. Now about the second improvement—the course of study. I think the course of study for our rural schools should be so arranged as to make agriculture the central subject, with stock breeding, poultry raising, also the building of silos and _ soil fertility, home economics, etc., so arranged with the present subjects and making a ninth grade work. It has been brought to my observation very forcibly just recently that the very best that many children could ever hope for in the way of an education is what they get in the rural school. Their parents are not able. to give them a higher edu- cation, but the rural school may prepare them to combat the real battles of life by giving them a knowledge of the work by which they will make their living. The third improvement I wish to call attention to is the teacher. We should have a qualified teacher, one who is com- petent to give the very best of instructions. I think the time near when a teacher holding only a third grade certificate will be unable to find employment in our rural schools. It is not so bad for a teacher to teach one term on a third grade certificate, but to do as some have in Johnson county for fifteen, twenty and twenty-five years is certainly going the limit and should not be considered at all. Now fourth, about co-operation. I think that parents should co-operate with their children, beginning when they are young to teach them to work, to take interest and pride in their work. Give them something for their own so they can make a little pin money for themselves. It makes them independent. Then teach them to invest their little savings. It teaches them to know the value of money. They will become interested in the stock, the farming, the chickens and the housework. It teaches them that your interest is their interest, that your business is their business. It encourages them in school work. It broadens their mind and will be the foundation of better manhood and womanhood. By co-operating with the boys and girls and mak- Missourt Country Life Conference. — 259 ing them your companions and partners in business you have their full confidence. Co-operate with the teacher. It gives her a better chance to demonstrate her ability as a teacher. Through co-operation with children, co-operation with the teacher and co-operation with your neighbors you will have a successful school, a credit and honor to district and county and State as well. | I know some parents who seem to think that the boy or the girl owes them a debt and they hold a mortgage on their lives, and should the boy or girl ask for any money these parents growl about how much they spend, which is about one dollar. When the boy or girl is about fifteen years old—or maybe they will stay until of age—then they are gone to make their own way, leaving the farm with its pure and wholesome surroundings, and going to the city where the lure of big wages and more pleasure attracts and where are temptations and pitfalls for their inexperienced minds. Is it any wonder so many fall by the way- side? Is it any wonder the farm is being depopulated today. One more thought, and it is this: How are we to get our rural schools on equal basis, so that the boys and girls in one district may have the same advantages as those in another. I believe that a county unit, or still better, a State unit of taxation, would solve the difficulty, the State to equalize the valuation and fix a tax by which every school would be put on an equal basis. By so doing it would give every boy and girl a chance to complete at least a ninth course, and as I have said, that the highest education some boys and girls can ever hope for is our rural schools. It not only enables them to wrestle with the problems of life, but will make better, broader men, and women with higher ideals. 260 Missouri Agricultural Report. MEANS FOR RURAL PROGRESS. (Professor A. W. Taylor, Bible College of Missouri, Columbia, Mo.) Others have treated specific parts of the general theme of this conference. It is my part to try to bind these various parts together and to show how they are interdepend- ent and interrelated. The farmer is the average man, and the average man is the best kind of a man out of which to make a nation. Picking up the picture of the farmer in his working clothes, Roose- velt struck the table with his fist and said, “That is the man I want to know.’ He is the man who makes up the bulk of the common people in the United States and his class is by far the largest in the country. President Wilson, scholar though he is, said he would not have experts and scientists in the executive departments of administration; he could trust the man of affairs to have better balanced judgment in matters of state. It is from the farm that our leaders largely come, and they make good because of the fund of common sense a boyhood of industrious life on the farm gives to men. As the farmer thinks so the country ought to go, for we are still an agricultural country, notwithstanding the tendency toward the city. There is a tendency toward the city, but it is not so much against the rural regions as the face of the figures might lead us to think. In 1880 70.5 per cent of the population was rural; in 1890 it was 63.9 per cent, and in 1910 it was 53.7 per cent. Yet there was an actual increase in the number of people on the farms; the city did not quite absorb the gross increase of population. It was a relative increase over the rural districts; but the actual movement from the farm to the city is perhaps not over 10 per cent in a decade—that is, not more than 10 per cent of our farm folk go to the city each decade. We do not need so many farmers as we did a generation ago. Then it took two men to create enough to feed themselves and the third man in the town. Now, with farm machinery, one farmer can feed the three. J have traveled among the country Prof. A. W. Taylor. Missouri Country Life Conference. 261 people of several European lands and everywhere it was the same—men, women and children working in the fields with hand tools. When some of us, now at mid-age, were boys on the farm a riding tool was scarcely known. ‘Today one lad with four horses will do as much as three of us used to do. The machine has made the farmer a business man; he is thinking of his farm in terms of profit more than, as he used to do, as a permanent home; he is becoming less a working man and more a capitalist. The speculative features thus brought into farm operations is not altogether of salutary value. President Wilson says that while the farmers were feeding the world Congress was feeding the trusts. A picture of the President’s cabinet will show the faces of men several of whom were brought up on the farm, but not one of whom is now a farmer. So it is with Congress and the Legislatures. Their members are largely lawyers. The farmers are the largest class and their interests are greater than those of banking or manu- facturing, yet the lawmakers are usually much more concerned with commercial and manufacturing interests than with farm interests; it is because the lawyer and average representative is a city man and sees commercial interests largest. Why do not the farmers send more of their own number to the Legislatures? Certainly they are the peers of many who go there from the cities. Our public domain was given away to the speculator and the cor- poration and the natural homes of the people forfeited to the speculative profits of rich men because we had no home makers in Congress who depended upon the land. So we practically built the railroads and then turned them over to skillful com- mercial manipulators who ran them for private instead of public interest, and charging all the “traffic will bear’? increased capi- talization enormously and now asks us to allow them to continue to make dividends on the inflated values, and some day will ask us to pay enormous prices to redeem the very rights of way we so freely gave away. In Germany the railroads are owned by the people and men ride for less than one-half what they pay in this country, and their freight packages are carried for the most part much cheaper because the roads are run as a public utility instead of as private enterprise. Here we have paid tens of millions to have our parcels carried by the express com- panies while in Europe the government has carried them for the whole people for a fraction of what we paid. The same is true of telegraph systems. ‘All these are public utilities and the 262 Missourt Agricultural Report. laws of competition do not apply to their operation. Because the laws of competition do not apply they became the mothers of monopolies, and the great nerves and arteries of our indus- trial and commercial life were turned over to private greed instead of being run for public benefit. Competition is put forth as the law of the universe. It is time to nail that as a lie, said Frederick Maurice, one of man- kind’s greatest lovers. Competition has its part to play, but it is only one-half the process of economic life. Co-operation is the law of society; it is the law of brotherhood. Competition never begets brotherhood; it may benefit the individual and give strength to individuality, but we need to emphasize the social nature quite as much as the personal, and thus the need of more of the spirit of co-operation. The great corporations have discovered the utility of co-operation; every corporation is a co-operative enterprise. The principle is good, but the cor- poration tends to co-operate for the good of the incorporators, and all too often to the prejudice of the interests of all not in the corporation. What we need is a co-operation that will take in all who deal in the commodity, the buyer as well as the maker and seller. At least, if the maker and seller will co- operate to prevent competition between themselves and thus increase profits, the consumer—and the farmer is the greatest of all consumers—needs to co-operate to buy and to sell his raw product that he may derive the same sort of mutual advantage as well as deal on even terms with the powerful agencies to which he sells and from which he buys. The farmer has been called a ‘“‘rampant individualist,” and there is too much truth in the charge. He needs to learn what the city man has learned, and that is that there is more profit in co-operation than in individualistic management of his affairs. In England alone there are 7,000,000 people who make their purchases at co-operative stores. The profits are saved to the purchaser. The greatest of our high cost of living factors, our Agricultural Department at Washington tells us, is the middle- man system. It is built on the competitive plan and is cum- brous and wasteful. Up in Wisconsin and the Dakotas the Scandinavian Americans are practicing co-operation with signal success. In Denmark the rural sections have been made over from poverty to prosperity through co-operation and scientific farming. They have co-operative agricultural societies, cream- eries, packing plants, stores and shipping arrangements. The Missouri Country Life Conference. 263 government inspects, stamps and guarantees the freshness and quality of the butter, bacon and eggs shipped to England and France and they thus top the market. The cost of brokerage is put into the hands of the producer. Co-operation, not compe- tition, has remade rural Denmark. New Zealand is another illustration of the benefits of co-operation. The land was appropriated by speculators at first, but now the government prohibits absentee ownership of idle land by rich speculators and turns the whole patrimony of nature over to the home maker. The poor man goes into the clearing with money loaned by the government and begins to create his own home out of nature’s raw gift to men. In Germany I saw many of the public markets where the producer and consumer met face to face and shared the profits of the broker and middleman. Let us take a few illustrations of the cost of our system of distribution and see wherein there is such a large waste of profit between the farmer who tills the ground at one end and the man who labors at forge and machine in the city at the other end. President Yokum of the Frisco system found that the Texas truck farmer often received only from one-tenth to one-fifth of what the New York worker paid. For instance, he got six and one-half cents for the peck of potatoes for which the New Yorker paid 60 cents. It was the same on onions and even much worse on watermelons. In the city of Rochester it was found that it takes 356 men, 380 horses, 305 wagons and 3,509 miles of travel daily to supply the city with milk. Less than one-fourth of the number of men and wagons and of the amount of travel would do it under a co-operative system, and it would be much easier to maintain adequate inspection, thus insuring a pure food for the babes. The grocers and middlemen do not always get rich. There is scarcely a town that does not have twice as many grocers as it needs. But competition gives every man a fight- ing chance to make a living in delive: ing goods, and the greater the number in the game the more every one of them must charge to make a living. Thus many go bankrupt and most of them play no necessary function in the work of distribution. We doubtless need the element of competition, but we do not need to let it run riot with our sense of economy. Scientific farming is the second means of rural progress upon which I wish to speak. In Germany I saw everywhere the women and children at work in the fields. Both there and in France the home farm of tbh* peasant is small and the size of 264 Missourt Agricultural Report. the farm will not allow the purchase of modern power machinery. But “‘necessity is the mother of invention,” and Germany turned science to the use of the peasant. She increased her yield of wheat 48 per cent in two decades while we increased ours less than 6 per cent in the same length of time; she also increased her yield of barley by 51.8 per cent while we made a gain of only 8.8 per cent, and that of potatoes by, 61.6 per cent while our increase was only 32.6 per cent. But we are learning. Our vast, unplowed domain and cheap land has kept us from turning to intensive farming and we have wasted much of our natural resource, but necessity is driving us to consider these things and education is convincing us of the value of them. The farmers of Wisconsin are saving $12,000,000 annually by spray- ing their fruit. A visit over to the Agricultural College is worth many talks upon this subject, so we will not tarry upon it. One of the greatest things to be done in Missouri is to learn to grow alfalfa. There are thousands of acres that are capable of making from $50 to $100 per acre each year with it, but we seem to lack patience and the willingness to make the temporary risk it requires. Our next topic is one in which, above all others, Missourians are, and by necessity ought to be, most interested. It is that of good roads. The story is told of a community not far from Columbia where a small tax levy for good roads was being voted upon. The election day was in the early spring and the roads deep with mud. In the late afternoon three men rode in on the trucks of a wagon with four mules hitched to it and pulling with all their strength even then to get through. Some one offered to wager there were three votes for the proposition, but to his surprise they had pulled in in that manner in order to get to vote against ever having such conditions changed. The road drag and grader will make any road fairly good the year around. We waste most of our road money in puttering up the roads instead of putting in permanent improvements. I cycled in several of the old countries and found one of their greatest assets to be in their good roads. It put every man in easy touch with his market. Again, the spirit of co-operation is the first requirement and a willingness to pay taxes for the common good. What we need is not less taxation but better use of what we do pay and then a a larger vision of what would come to us all through more public taxation of the right kind. Missouri Country Life Conference. 265 With the good road comes the better school. We are proud of the little red schoolhouse. It was the nurturing place of our democracy and universal American culture, but it taught us how to be never contented with primitive vehicles of public good, such as it was. The country could have as good schools as the towns if they would pay as much, but when the town pays $1.00 school tax and the rural district only 40 cents as good cannot be expected. With good roads comes the centralized and well- graded school, and it actually costs less than the old-time, one- room schoolhouse, while trebling the efficiency of education, making it possible for the farmer’s child to have a high school course and also keeping the boy and girl in rural surroundings and educating them in rural arts, instead of sending them away from home at great expense to be educated in city arts and thus be won away fromthe farm. The enterprise is not nearly so formidable as it looks; indeed, it is made comparatively easy now under our new law and the offer of State help; but it does require initiative and public spirit and it will never be done so long as the farmer is a “rampant individualist.” The farmer needs to talk over community interests more. When he comes to town on Saturday he talks with neighbors, in groups of twos and threes, the things of common interest. But it is usually things of less public and more private interest and much of the talk is social and merely the exchange of opinion and personal experience. Suppose he could have clubs and societies where matters of public interest could be talked over more. The schoolhouses and rural churches can furnish the centers. The townfolk meet daily and their daily papers and ever-open churches keep them close together. The farmer lacks these opportunities of free exchange of ideas and oppor- tunities for mutual action. The country woman is just as sociable as the town woman, but she does not have the clubs and societies that enable her to turn her sociability into com- munity action. Yet she is generally more of a housekeeper and has-more things in common than the woman in town. She would find great profit in mothers’ meetings. She is usually a superb economist and would profit by an exchange of experience of a more formal nature than the telephone allows. Governor Hughes told the people of Rochester, when he spoke in their social centers, that he was more interested in what they were doing than in anything else in the world, because in it he saw the very buttress and foundations of democracy. ‘These social RES 266 Missourt Agricultural Report. centers are in the schoolhouses. If the city can profit by them how much more the country? It is by such meeting together and talking over common problems that we make ourselves intelligent citizens. Gladstone said the men of the farm and workshops were the nation’s foundation, and declared that in the labor unions of workaday England was the hope of democracy. He thought so because they get together and talk over public questions and enlighten one another and learn to act together for the common good. In recreation we find another need of interest and co- operation in the country. You say his work gives him enough exercise; that the sawbuck is the best gymnasium. But you overlook the play side of boy and girl nature. That is by nature a social thing, and it cannot be met by toil but only by recreation and in games. The country needs field meets and contests and all sorts of public gatherings for the youth. Perhaps more young people go to town for the sake of play and association with other young people than for any other one cause. They find little diversion on the farm, and the lure of the city with its high lights and gayety is too attractive for them to resist. There is excite- ment and crowds and pleasure and the hope of riches. But few get the riches, and many get sodden poverty in the city and the pleasure all too often is that of the moth-and-flame variety. Give the farm children and youth more association and chance to play together and keep their interests in the country. Build neat homes as the townfolk do and lend to toil a flavor of human interest, and boys and girls will want to stay with the fresh air and beauty of the country. Teach them the excessive mor- tality of city life and educate them in farm lore instead of city ways and fewer will leave the farms and the ways of their fathers. The first and most fundamental of all means to rural progress is that of co-operation. It is the nurturing spirit for all good things needed. It will save money and it will make money. It will help get good roads and will cultivate the com- munity desire to get them. It will bring better schools, and once put to work in all community matters will bring to the farmer all that progress demands for him. The center from which it ought to spring is the church. It is deplorable that the one institution that should teach co-operation and fraternity so often destroys it by dividing good men into opposing camps over matters of creed. Suppose we united in matters of deed and made our religion a matter of works instead of opinion. lol Missourt Country Life Conference. 267 There would soon be an end of sectarian Christianity with its duplication of churches, its once-a-month absentee pastoring, and its general inefficiency, and the substitution of a community church that would unite men of common faith in the common tasks of righteousness and community betterment. Photo by W. L. Nelson. THERE IS MUCH OF BEAUTY IN RURAL MISSOURI. Missouri Farm Management Association. OFFICERS. President—J. Ed. Hall, Lamonte, Mo. Vice-President—Ollie Davis, Wellsville, Mo. Secretary-Treasurer—R. S. Besse, Columbia, Mo. Advisory Board—D. H. Doane, Columbia; F. B. Mumford, Columbia; W. P. Dysart, Columbia. WORK OF THE ASSOCIATION. (R. S. Besse, secretary-treasurer.) The Missouri Farm Management Association was organized in 1910 for the purpose of co-operating with and organizing those farmers in Missouri who desire help in their farm management problems. Many letters were coming into the farm management office from all parts of the State asking questions concerning their farm—rota- tion, marketing and labor problems. So on the basis of these numerous ques- tions and from the requests for farm visits and assistance the association was formed with 75 charter members. Pha lieecee: It has increased its membership to date of January, 1914, to a total of 350 pro- gressive Missouri farmers. For a time, until the membership became too large to be handled in this way, visits were made to individual farms and crop systems and rotation plans were dis- cussed. The department of farm management, co-operating with the United States Department of Agriculture at Washing- ton, worked through the association members in carrying on their work of investigation and demonstration. The Farm Management Association, however, is now too large for one or even two men to handle the work by personal (268) Missourt Farm Management Association. 269 visits, so that portion of the work is being handled through cor- respondence only. A labor bureau, through which the’ members may secure more adequate farm help, is a department of the association doing a good work. Many calls come from members desiring help and numbers of requests from men desiring work. Through the association these men are brought together. The information bureau, through which many questions concerning the farm will be answered as thoroughly and quickly as possible, is another source of benefit for the members. The Farm Management Association holds its annual meet- ing at Columbia during Farmers’ Week, when plans for the succeeding year and general policies of the association are discussed. BETTER UTILIZATION RATHER THAN GREATER PRODUCTION. (D. H. Doane, professor of farm management, University of Missouri.) There are four fundamental or underlying principles for successful farm management in Missouri. In the following these four principles will be stated and the last one briefly discussed: 1. The size of the business must be com- paratively large.—For general farming in Mis- sourl we should have at least 100 to 160 acres. 2. The farm operations should be diversi- fied.—The old saying, “Put all your eggs in one basket and watch the basket,’? may be correct as it applies to eggs, but it does not Pha do DOT apply to Missouri farming. 3. Man and horse labor must be productively employed throughout the year.—This simply means that the farmer, his hired help and his work stock must be kept busy at a kind of labor that will bring a return. 4. Soil, crops and stock have the broadest utilization.—This principle has to do with the use of the product grown on the farm. In discussing the last principle it would be well to look at a few concrete examples: Three years ago on one of our demon- stration farms the corn yield in a particular field was 15 bushels 270 Missourt Agricultural Report. to the acre. The corn had a catch crop growing in it. Fifteen bushels of corn at 50 cents a bushel would have made us a return of $7.50 per acre. This crop was so utilized that the return amounted to as much as though we had raised between 50 and 60 bushels of corn. In other words, what was lacking in pro- duction was more than made up, and certainly more easily made up, by the proper utilization of the crop that was grown. This was accomplished in this way: At corn-planting time the corn had cowpeas planted in it. We used the black variety, putting about three peas to two grains of corn, or about ten pounds to the acre. The peas were put in at the same time as corn, with a cowpea attachment to the planter. The two crops came on together, and during September the hogs were turned into this field. Before being turned in, however, they were shut up in a small pen and fed cowpeas that had been freshly cut in the field. This was done in order to teach them to eat the green peas. When they were turned into the field they grazed down the peas, corn and all, thus balancing their ration very satisfactorily and making the gain so economically that our final figures made it possible for us to make the statement made at the beginning. In other words, an acre of corn and cowpeas returned as great an income when hogged down as though we had raised 50 bushels of market corn. This shows how it is possible to make a small production yield a large return by the best of utilization. On another demonstration farm the crop under considera- tion was rye and rape. Fall rye was sown with the rape in the spring, the two crops coming on together. The rye making the quickest growth, furnished pasture two to three weeks before the rape was ready. At that time hot and dry weather set the spring-sown rye back a little, and the rape came on vigorously. This combination made excellent hog feed, and it was on this field of forage crops that the fall litters were finished off during the months of April, May and June. Old corn was purchased at 60 cents a bushel and fed to the hogs on this field. After the hogs had been weighed out and sold and the returns figured up the following results were found: The feeding period of these hogs is divided into three divisions, which we will call periods 1, 2 and 3. During the first period the corn and forage made a return in pork of $1.33 per bushel with the corn fed. During the second period, when the forage crop was still better, the return for a bushel of corn fed was $1.44, and during the third period, after.the dry weather cut Missourt Farm Management Association. Din the forage crops somewhat, the return was $1.03 per bushel. In other words, the average return for the forage crop consumed during the time that the hogs were eating a bushel of corn was 73 cents. This allows full cost value of the corn of 60 cents. In another instance the corn and cowpeas were planted to- gether as described, and 152 head of western lambs were pur- chased the middle of September and turned into the cornfield. They grazed out the undergrowth, not bothering the ears of corn, and in 86 days they had gained 27 pounds, making a profit of $1.40 per head, after charging full value for all the feed con- sumed, freight, commissions, interest on investment, loss and other items of expense. In other words, the profit on the lambs was as great per acre as the profit on the corn. Another farmer found that better utilization came to him by handling his wheat in such a way that he doubled the sale value of it. At threshing time, instead of hauling his wheat to the mill and getting 75 cents a bushel for it, he hauled it to the barn where he graded and cleaned it, and then sold it for seed at $1.50 a bushel. In other words, the work put in on this pure- bred Fultz wheat used in preparing it for market was from one- fifth to one-tenth as great as the labor expended in producing the wheat, while in each case the receipts for the two classes of labor were the same. In other words, he would have received only 75 cents a bushel if he had sold from the threshing machine, and for the extra few days’ labor of getting it in good seed form he received the.same price per bushel. Profit on the last kind of labor was far greater than that on the first. THE BOYS’ DEPARTMENT AT FARMERS’ WEEK, 1914. (R. S. Besse, in charge.) Four years from this date it is not impossible or even im- probable that Farmers’ Week of the old type will take on a new aspect in which farm boys will predominate. Indeed, we would not go far wrong to believe that even now in the process of evo- lution can be seen the ‘“‘Making of Farmers’ Week a Boys’ Week.” Even in the face of the fact that Farmers’ Week this year was the very biggest and best ever held in the State,those attending and associated with the work agreed that the influence of the ‘“‘Boys’ Department” was felt. Did Missourt Agricultural Report. An attendance of more than 2,000 farmers from Missouri and many other states—the record for 1914—-speaks volumes for the Missouri farmers, the work of agricultural education and the institutions representing such education. But one thousand boys from Missouri farms, representing the young blood of the State, will have a far greater influence on Farmers’ Week and what it stands for than the same number of grown-up men. The question may legitimately be asked, ‘““Where can we find a thousand boys and, having found them, what inducements would bring so many to our State agricultural institutions?” The answer is easy. Thirteen Missouri counties today have farm advisers, men who are devoting their entire time to the development and promotion of improved agriculture and better rural life. They all admit a more eager response from the boys and girls of the farm than from the older persons. It is unreason- able then to believe that these counties in one way or another, through contests and prizes of different kinds led by the farm advisers, could send fifty of their choice youth to the Farmers’ Week school? We do not think this is unreasonable, for this year, 1914, Johnson county with but little effort, under Mr. Long’s direction, brought twenty-two boys to attend the school. On the other hand, this work is by no means limited to counties having farm advisers. Every county in the State could, by a simple series of contests, conducted or planned by some public-spirited citizen, send from four to ten boys to the Farmers’ Week school at Columbia. In this way the one thousand mark could soon be reached. Having found the boys and arranged for their expenses, what would be their reception at Columbia? “a i ; : ri s |3|> EAS ‘\ aoe Ue teal M) ie | IMNOSSIN 40 LISOdgd bet! | Lb ' WYuvi1d r 43243W | | | suns | | [aaiaassy iss Y¥ Mos ss901 ff = TE 2 ree ONY 1L09S At Wathena, Kan., just across the Missouri river from St. Joseph, Associa- This little town of The Wathena lumber 1912 more apples than any other apple district in the world, yard, the elevator, the general store and the county insurance and this district supports at the present time as prosperous and well-to-do fruit growing communities as can be found. Mo., $500,000 in fruits are shipped yearly. Wathena is a “fruit growing town.” company are owned by the Wathena Fruit Growers Missouri State Board of Horticulture. 363 tion. The name of the local bank is the Wathena Fruit Growers’ Bank. This town is an inspiration to the man who likes to see the small owner prosper. Wathena is one of the many asso- ciations in the Missouri river “‘Loess’’ fruit district. This loess district furnishes us with an unique and highly interesting story. A description of this district will be found in the paper read by the secretary of the Board of Horticulture at the fruit growers’ meeting. Loess soil grapes. 364 Missouri Agricultural Report. Nine thousand four hundred dollars worth of grapes were sold from the “‘Loess’”’ district in Missouri in 1912, and $179,050 worth were sold from the part of it not in Missouri. The Mis- sourl grapes were not sold through associations. Those across the river were. Had the Missouri grapes been sold at the same price as those through the associations they would have brought $9,400 more. The difference between 114 cents, the average price received by growers not in associations, and 2% cents, the average price received by association members, might easily represent the difference between profit and loss—between prosperity and the other things, good roads and bad roads, the best schools and those not so good, and many other things of fundamental con- cern to the agriculturist. As stated, all of the papers road by representatives of the various associations in the “Loess” district will not be pub- lished here. The paper by the secretary of the Board of Horti- culture and two papers by association representatives will fill the available space. REPORT OF CO-OPERATIVE MEETING. This meeting began Tuesday, January 13th, with Dr. W. L. Howard in the chair. In welcoming the fruit growers Dr. Howard said, “I do not recall any time when so many successful business men in the horticultural line have been gathered to- gether in one conference. This is truly a remarkable work that is just beginning here this evening. The State Board of Horti- culture has called this meeting as the first step toward the or- ganization of the people of Missouri, in order that they might accomplish much that Colonel Dalton outlined to you yesterday.” An appropriate address of weléome was made by Colonel Richard Dalton. John Bland, secretary of the Board, was then called upon and spoke as follows: REMARKS BY MR. BLAND. We are at this meeting, first, to discuss the various things that contribute to the success or failure of co-operative fruit growers’ associations and, second, to form a temporary or per- manent bureau for the exchange of crop and market informa- tion from districts represented. We have in attendance about thirty-five representatives of associations, a large portion of whom are from the famous Missouri river fruit district. Our Missourt State Board of Horticulture. 365 great need of associations in Missouri lies in the fruit district of the Missouri valley, rather than in the Ozarks, where there are now a great number of effective associations. Our problem at this meeting is one then that involves Missouri river valley growers primarily, and we are glad to have here gentlemen whose experience in this same district fits you to be of greatest help to us in Missouri. In the land of the loess soil. View of vineyard and hills. Before going into the explanation of what is proposed to be done, I want to call your attention to the Missouri river fruit district, the district producing more apples at the present time than any other district in the world. That is, as compared to districts that are “units” of territory. Who knows what this district is? Few people indeed. Why is this? Simply for the reason that it has lost its identity by being cut into four pieces—quartered, as it were—by the state lines of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas and Missouri; and its apple production, instead of being known as that of the Missouri river district, is known to the world only as the apple produc- tion of the great apple states of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas and Missouri. Why, do you know that three-fourths of the apples raised in these four states are raised in the little district that 366 Missouri Agricultural Report. stretches along the Missouri river from Omaha to Kansas City, sometimes twenty, never more than fifty miles in width. That is astounding news to most of us. It came to me as a revela- tion when the figures of the actual apple production of Missouri showed that eight-tenths of the apples produced in Missouri are produced in this little strip of territory along the Missouri river. Two counties in Northwest Missouri produced in 1912 more apples than all the State of Oregon, and one county just across the line in Kansas marketed more than $500,000 in fruit. Do you ask why this strip of territory is distinguished from all the lands of these states as the great apple producing district? Here we face as interesting a story as horticulture has to offer. There are two great divisions of soils in the world: One comprises all of those that have been produced either entirely or in part by weathering or chemical bleaching; the other is the soil that has been produced from mechanical grinding up of rock into particles of microscopic size. One kind of soil has been produced by chemical and mechanical action; the other has been produced by mechanical action only. There is but one soil in this last group, and that is the true loess soil. This soil may be said to be to all other soils as gold is to all other The best of the world’s fruit soils—the loess soils of the Missouri river hills. Missourt State Board of Horticulture. DOs metal. It is the rarest of the useful soils and is the best. Prof. M. F. Miller, chief of the agronomy department, University of Missouri, has said that this soil is, in his opinion, the best of the world’s agricultural soils. This soil is found in only three places in the world: First, a small deposit near the river Rhine in Germany; second, a much larger deposit extending along the Missouri river two to thirty miles in width from Omaha to St. Louis, and along the Mississippi a short distance above and below St. Louis; and third, deposit in Northern China. These unique soil deposits are the result of glacial action, and are believed to have been formed by winds that prevailed during the time of arid climate that followed the glacial period. This soil is the world’s best fruit soil. There are soils in South Missouri, in the great Ozark fruit region, which are quite as good for some of the fruits as far as actual results are concerned, but as compared to all other soils, the extraordinary physical struc- ture of the loess soil, allowing penetration of roots to unbeliev- able depths and perfect underdrainage as well as perfect mois- ture supply in dry weather, places this soil first as a fruit soil. As regards the plant food in this soil, Dr. J. C. Whitten, chief of the horticultural department of the University of Missouri, tells us that on his farm near the Missouri river, about eight miles from Columbia, the dirt from the bottom of his cistern, 25 feet below the surface, was used to fill in the low place in his garden, and that it produced quite as good vegetables as the surface soil, and we know what this surface soil will do. Twenty to two hundred feet deep, rich in plant food to the bottom, perfect physical structure, this soil ranks as the best fruit soil of the world and distinguishes our Missouri river valley as the heaviest producing of all apple districts. This district, then, is made distinct from the rest of our middle west fruit districts by this marvelous loess soil. We may recognize this soil by its peculiar character which enables it to stand up in perpendicular walls where cut into. This is due to its homogeneous physical structure, which allows water to seep out between particles and yet be held together by the countless ‘shoulders’ caused by its many “jagged” edges. Soils built by processes of erosion have not these ‘jagged”’ edges, and only the true loess, which is simply crushed rock, will be found in perpendicular cliffs in our rainy climate. This peculiar characteristic accounts for our being able to cul- 368 Missourt Agricultural Report. tivate the steepest hillsides without loss from washing and also for the fact that our Missouri river hills have remained so steep. We are here to begin the work of establishing a chain of co-operative associations covering this district, so that later we Not a rocky bluff, but a formation of loess soil. Missouri State Board of Horticulture. 369 may combine under a central exchange and put the Missouri river valley fruit, including tree and small fruits, up before the world under a common brand that will stand for honesty of pack- ing, uniformity of grade, excellence in appearance and flavor far above that of our competitors, the fruit growers of the northwest coast. We now have thirteen successful associations in this dis- trict, and I am glad to say that they were all represented here. We are going to get the benefits of the experience of these men and build an enduring structure on the foundation furnished by their experience. We must have a strong federation in this valley. Missouri river valley growers paid in 1912 forty cents per barrel more freight than did New York growers to get their apples delivered to their markets. This is the comparison of the average ton-mile cost for hauling from Missouri river points and from New York points. New York apples are the com- petitors of Missouri river apples. Taking twenty cents, which is one-half of that really paid by our competitors, as the average, and we see that Missouri valley growers paid $320,000 in excess freights—a third of a million dollars in one year. If we were joined together in a strong federation the funds necessary to fight this discrimination would be forthcoming. It is up to us to do all that is possible to unify our efforts as fruit growers. The western invader—and we are not afraid of him on even footing—has taken our better markets to himself. And why? Do not let us avoid the issue—because he has furnished con- sumers with a product that he guaranteed to be good all the way through. Has any district ever established and maintained a stand- ard, dependable pack except through the agency of a co-opera- tive marketing association? An individual has, but never a district. W. S. Keeline of Council Bluffs, Iowa, sent his son, Frank, west in 1906 to learn western methods in packing boxed apples. Six years later, after building up a reputation among the people of Council Bluffs for his standard pack, Mr. Keeline sold boxed apples at prices uniformly fifty cents higher than western boxed apples. Council Bluffs had learned that the ““W. S. Keeline’”’ brand meant apples that tasted better. Are we afraid of the western invader? Yes, as long as we are not working together. We must establish a pack, make it cover a great quantity of 370 Missouri Agricultural Report. fruit, and people will ask for Missouri river apples—‘‘the apples with the taste.”’ We want to work up to the point where we have a common brand and then advertise that brand. We can educate the consumer to our mutual profit. No, you will not have to cut out your Ben Davis trees and plant the Juicy Jonathan. There is no better apple than the Ben Davis—when it is baked. Tell the consumer that you are selling him a cooking apple. Would a certain big manufacturer be fool enough to put out his imi- tation of coffee in the same kind of a box with the same direc- tions for using as he does his breakfast foods? Let’s get to- gether and educate the consumer. Who is going to advertise the apple? The man who grows it—and make every man pay for that advertising who gets the benefit of it; don’t advertise the apple unless you advertise the brand that is fixed to that apple, a brand that stands for honesty of pack. We cannot advertise the apple effectively until we organize. We cannot compete with other big business concerns until we organize. We must act as a unit, and let that unit be composed of in- dividual growers, each of whom has an equal voice in saying what that unit will do. We are done with the day of the local apple buyer, I hope. Our Missouri valley brand will be advertised to the world and it will signify more than excellence in the one fruit, apples. Who has tasted finer small fruits than those grown in our Mis- sourl river loess hills? Where do small fruits grow as abun- dantly? Where is there a more prosperous, live, up-to-date fruit growing community than the one just across the Missouri river—I refer to the Wathena, Kan., Fruit Growers’ Associa- tion. Why should our good mid-western people drink grape juice made in New York when they have the best of the world’s grape soils on sale at twenty-five to sixty dollars an acre? Association communities know what can be done with grapes in Missouri river loess soil, and I want to tell you that it was an inspiration to me when I traveled through your glorious country last fall and saw mile after mile of beautiful rolling ‘ country covered with grape vineyards and berry fields. Our district is coming into its own and I hope that this meeting may hasten the day. I have talked too long. Just a brief outline of the second purpose of the meeting, the organization of an interstate bureau. Last summer our office made quite an effort to supply Missouri Missourt State Board of Horticulture. Sil Hauling grapes to the warehouse of the Co-operative Selling Association. Florence Fruit Growers’ Association. growers with reliable crop report information. On all hands, in the far eastern and far western districts of the United States, the difficulty of securing competent information was encoun- tered. Plans were suggested for an interstate organization to establish a system for the exchange of crop report information, and that is the second purpose of this meeting. 372 Missouri Agricultural Report. REMARKS BY J. A. AULABAUGH. In introducing the speaker the chairman said, ‘‘Over in Council Bluffs, Iowa, they have successfully grown apples and fruits of different kinds, and the men who have been associated with the organization up there for over 21 years are ready to give us some definite figures. We are going to call upon a man to tell us what he has been able to do growing fruit and what assistance the organization there has been to him as an individual. We will now hear from Mr. J. A. Aulabaugh, a director in the Council Bluffs Grape Growers’ Association. Mr. Aulabaugh spoke as follows: Your secretary has brought me before you to make a statement of facts regarding co-operation in the marketing of fruit. He has selected me I presume because I am a member of the Council Bluffs Grape Growers’ Association, a corpora- tion that represents a community where co-operation has been thoroughly tested and successfully practiced for 21 years. It is my pleasure, therefore, to give you such facts as will prove the value of such an organization. Since entering upon this field of labor I have endeavored to keep an accurate account of all transactions executed on the place and at the same time keep in touch with the asso- ciation. Every crop is treated as my debtor, and all work, material, etc., is charged against its individual account, and all produce sold is duly credited to each account. To me farming is a business, and I have never been able to understand why some men go on year after year without knowing whether they have made a loss or gain on their respective crops or whether the profit of one crop is not consumed by the loss on the other. It seems to me that the greatest help our rural schools could give to the farmer would be to teach the coming generation a simple and practical course of bookkeeping to meet the demand of farm business.. Since co-operative associations will soon be the rule rather than the exception, the youth of today should be taught such business rules and methods as will give him self-assurance to enable him to meet business men on their own ground. Co-operation must be the outcome of education, and nothing will so quickly dispel the natural sus- picion of the average man as a little practical information about business. I have kept my books solely for my own convenience and not with any idea of publication, so I have found it impossible Missourt State Board of Horticulture. 373 at so short notice to give you as detailed an account as was requested by your secretary. Instead I have taken, as an example, my oldest grape patch consisting of eleven acres, which was in rather a dilapidated condition at the time I took possession. This patch I have chosen in order to show you the possibilities of the grape interest during a period of ten years. I have made a summary of the original eleven acres of grapes and to simplify it have taken the average of one acre. The first year the average crop was 306 baskets for ten acres; the tenth year the average crop was 1,624 baskets for ten acres. The greatest number to a single acre was 2,232 and the least number was 158 baskets. Following is the average of the eleven-acre patch for a period of ten years reduced to one acre per annum: Receipts—829 eight-pound baskets sold at 17 2-9 cents, $142.77; disbursements—renewal of posts and setting, $1.60; pruning, $4.60; raking out brush, $11.44; twine, $1.27; tieing grapes, $4.08; cultivating, $2.25; hoeing, $3.69; 829 empty baskets at $22.50 per thousand, $18.65; picking, $12.43; delivering, $3.31; extra labor, $3.00; commission less rebate, $10.99; icing (net), $2.07. Total, $69.41. Average net profit, $73.36. For the last five years the average was better than for the first five years. This does not include interest on the invest- ment, for the reason that land varies so much in value in dif- ferent sections. I have also grown diversified crops of fruit during this period, but can only generalize on them in my statement. I have grown some food crops for my own use, but more with the idea of renovating and renewing the old plantation. There are forty acres in the place, about 28 of which are in fruit. The products were not quite all put through the association, for the reason that it did not handle several kinds of fruit, especially apples, for a number of years. Now then I want to speak of co-operation. If there is a scarcity of fruit generally all over the country and we have a good quality of stock we can easily realize a fair price for our product without co-operation, because we will have a good demand on our local market. But we cannot do as well even then as we could with co-operation, as I will show you later. Suppose there is a large crop all over the country, what will be the result? Let me call your attention to our two bumper crops during O74 Missourt Agricultural Report. this ten-year period, the years of 1907 and 1912. This applies to grapes only. In 1907 we handled 262,124 baskets of grapes through the association. We realized an average of 2334 cents per eight-pound basket, and why? Because nearly all sec- tions were short all over the country that year, and we were long on grapes. Co-operation stepped in and enabled us to reach out and get into touch with distant markets and we sold grapes as far west as Seattle, south to San Antonio, and we even had an order from Charleston, S. C. We could not fill all our orders. This enabled us to dictate our own market instead of dumping the grapes on our local market, and at such prices as our curbstone brokers would see fit to dictate to us. In 1912 we had the largest crop ever grown in our sec- tion, and there was a very large crop generally over the country and the average ran very low—14.6 cents. Competition was heavy in all directions. We shipped 383,367 baskets through our association. Now right here at the height of the season, when we were shipping out from seven to eight cars per day, the non-co-operative growers were dumping their grapes on the Omaha and Council Bluffs markets in all kinds of receptacles— even bushel baskets—and at any price offered. I want to ask you where would the market have been if the associate mem- bers had dumped from seven to eight carloads—twenty to twenty-five thousand baskets a day—on top of the glut that was already there. I say that without co-operation 75 per cent at least of the growers of Council Bluffs and Omaha would have been driven out of business and would have depreciated the value of their land to at least.50 per cent of their present valuation. There is one thing to which I wish to call your attention, and this is what I consider the greatest enemy to co-operation with the farmer. It is the speculator—he will exploit you. That is his business—keep him out. Don’t allow speculation. Make the business strictly mutual, and let the organization be for and of the growers only. You may think you need speculator’s influence, and capital—we thought so at one time, but we know better now. I will not argue further against the speculator, but let me urge you to limit your membership strictly to men who specialize in the growing of fruit, and do not allow any of your stock to be owned by outsiders; they will not further your interests, but will be more likely to sap your organization for their own gain. Missouri State Board of Horticulture. 57/0) Provision should also be made for taking up the member- ship of any man who ceases to be a producer or who refuses to sell through the association for a given period of time. Of course, he could be reinstated under certain conditions. These two protective measures should be fully covered in your articles of incorporation—not your by-laws. In organizing an association you must interest the grower from this standpoint—‘‘Will co-operation pay me?”’ Let me state briefly how it has paid in my case, which is the strongest testimonial I can offer. Co-operation has saved me each year in equipment and upkeep $188; in extra labor, $160; in rebate on commissions, $115.75. This makes a neat total of $463.75 per year, or $4,637.50 in a period of ten years. This does not take into consideration the vast amount of per- sonal time saved in selling all of my own products. As to the central exchange for the Missouri river valley, I am in favor of it. Let its name be what you will, but let its principles be for the mutual good of the Missouri valley growers, and with such a foundation success will be yours so long as the old Missouri continues to roll her turbulent waters to the sea. REMARKS BY C. D. KEELINE, COUNCIL BLUFFS, IOWA. The subject assigned me is the ‘““Commercial Record of the Council Bluffs Fruit Growers’ Association,’ so I have left the history and organization of our association to Mr. Aulabaugh and Mr. W. S. Keeline, and have tried to keep as closely as possible to the statistical side. The Council Bluffs Grape Growers’ Association was founded twenty-one years ago with a membership of eighteen or twenty. At the time of organization the members owned only about 400 acres of bearing fruit divided approximately as follows: Straw- berries, 35 acres; raspberries, 75 acres; plums, 15 acres; grapes, 100 acres; blackberries, 50 acres; cherries, 25 acres; currants, GB, 10 acres; apples, 115 acres. Excluding the apples, this leaves about 300 acres of fruit controlled by the association. During the next three years all of these acreage figures except apples more than doubled and the next few years doubled again. The association had made the market secure and a large amount of small fruit was planted. The orchards were young and many acres of berries and cherries were set out between the apple trees. The acreage of berries, cherries, plums, etc., 376 Missouri Agricultural Report. steadily increased until the maturity of our orchards and vine- yards, about ten years ago. Since the association was started the apple acreage has grown from 115 acres to about 2,500 acres. (This is acreage owned by members; Pottawattamie county has 5,364 acres of apples.) Our vineyards have increased from about 100 acres, with a production around 40,000 baskets a year, to 500 acres and an average production of about 300,000 baskets. The average price per basket in the last 11 years is a little less than 19 (214 cents per pound). Our average yearly price has been as high as 25 cents in 1910, 24 cents in 1907, and as low as 15 cents in 1912. I have with me our accounts in full for the last 11 years, showing the amount handled of each fruit and the prices received. I also have these figures plotted on co-ordinate paper, so that if anyone is interested they may compare them very easily with their own production and prices received. I shall read the statements in part for 1912 and 1913. The average prices received for the various small fruits for the last seven years are as follows: Blackberries, $2.37 per crate of 24 liquid quarts; raspberries, $2.82 per crate of 24 liquid quarts; cherries, $2 per crate of 24 liquid quarts; strawberries, $2.52 per crate of 24 liquid quarts. As I have said before, the original membership was less than 20. This season’s membership was 110. The original acreage was about 115 acres of bearing fruit. The present acreage is estimated at over 1,150 acres, excluding the apples. These figures do not represent the amount of farm land owned by the members, or any fruit not yet bearing, but are an esti- mate on the actual bearing acreage. Since the organization of our association the population of this territory has increased 60 per cent. The total acreage of bearing fruit has increased nearly 900 per cent. The acreage of grapes has increased 500 per cent, and the acreage of small fruit increased about 50 per cent. This is a good evidence of the success of co-operation in our community, as at the time of organization our growers were even then producing more than the local market could consume and we had as a market the three cities of Omaha, South Omaha and Council Bluffs. At the outset the association was incorporated for $1,000, divided into 100 shares of $10 each. Since then the capital stock has been increased to $35,000 at $10 per share. Each Missouri State Board of Horticulture. SWE member to join pays $10, which makes him a member for life. He is now supposed to ship all his fruit through the association, and if he does not do so his dividends may be forfeited at the discretion of the board of directors. I will now try to make the workings of the association clear by following a growers’ fruit and the bookkeeping thereon through from the beginning. A member’s load of fruit is driven into the warehouse, to the cars that are being loaded. The fruit must be up to a certain standard. If it is grapes, the baskets must weigh 8 pounds; the appearance must be first class; berry boxes must be full, etc. It is inspected as it is unloaded, and as each package must bear the grower’s name and address beside the stamp of the association, it is not difficult to trace back fruit of poor quality to the grower, even if it should get by the in- spector at the car. The driver is now given a receipt showing the amount of the load, also the date and car number if a car is being loaded direct. A duplicate of this receipt remains in the book, which that evening is turned in to the bookkeeper. The bookkeeper enters this into a book called the “pool book.’ This book has a page for each day divided into columns—a double column for each kind of fruit. In the first column is entered the grow- er’s name, the number of packages of his fruit and later on his share of the pool for the day. The second column contains the names of the firms buying the fruit, the number of packages each took and the amount paid for it. The number of pack- ages of fruit in the two columns must balance and the sum of the amounts paid for the fruit divided by the total number of packages is the pool on that fruit for the day. That is the aver- age price received for one package of the fruit for the day. This is multiplied by the number of packages credited each grower and placed after his name in the first column. The cash amounts in the two columns must now balance. Before leaving the subject of “‘the pool’ I want to say that a grower whose fruit falls below the association standard does not share in the pool for the day, but is credited with just what his fruit may bring. The next book is a ledger. Each grower has a page on which each day the date, the number of packages of his fruit, the price, gross sales, the commission, icing charge and net amount are put down in columns for that purpose. 378 Missourt Agricultural Report. A commission of ten per cent is charged against everyone, besides a small icing charge to pay for icing the cars while they are being loaded. Under this sheet is another one with the same headings and between them is a piece of carbon paper, so that a copy is made of this record. At the end of the month, if the grower draws out his money, the date and amount are written in columns provided and the.duplicate torn out and given to the grower, so that he has a complete record of all his dealings with the association. The rest of the accounting is ordinary bookkeeping—a cash book, etc., and could be varied to sult the wants of the growers at any time. The association ships the fruit of nonmembers and charges them 10 per cent commission, the same as members. Ten per cent, however, each year more than pays the expenses of han- dling the fruit, so that at the end of every year dividends are declared on the earnings of the association, which goes back to the members as a per cent on the fruit they have shipped during the year. Nonmembers, of course, receive no divi- dends. The amount of the dividends is usually around 4 per cent, reducing the actual commission of the members to about 6 per cent. The association’s gross receipts for the year 1913 were $65,542.07. Of this $8,451.15, or over one-seventh, was handled for nonmembers. This figure, however, is not a fair average showing, as in 1912 we handled $83,674 worth and in 1911 over $100,000 worth. This last amount, however, includes the Omaha fruit. In 1907 we sold over $120,000 worth of fruit. The association rents two stalls on the Omaha market and also sells to local grocers, etc. The local sales in Council Bluffs and Omaha, however, run well under 8 per cent of the total sales, leaving 92 per cent on the general market of the country. Be- sides this, the association buys boxes, crates, baskets, chemicals for spraying, ink for stamping, etc., in large quantities at whole- sale price. and sells to members at cost plus a small handling cost. Nonmembers may also buy material, but at a slightly higher price than members. However, even at this nonmem- bers find the association price cheaper than the price generally charged by dealers. A box and crate factory is run during the winter months, making up the berry boxes and crates for the coming season. A good deal of this work can be done in slack seasons by the Missourt State Board of Horticulture. 379 regular fruit handlers. The earnings from this factory go into the regular funds of the association. Two building associations have been formed among the members for the purpose of building our present office building and warehouse. 269) 1767 HS) PAD Datars lin- 2 \o> olletetoiee «1-01 LAUT IAS Al 258 Bates eerste o's 6 6053} 78.3) 20] 1/....| 1) 18 1)...) 1...) 565) 9 Zins Benton..... | 107) 492 1.1) 130) 44/ 15! 6] 29) 22) 2) 1) 5) 55) 395) 3] 73 Bollinger........ 556] 1152 | 13.4| 430/243|....{ 59| 53] 2)/...} 1|...| 50} 881] 12/309 Boone sse te gees: | 86] 1113 | 106.2} 73) 19} 8] 3) 3]...) 2) 3|...| 269) 706) 17/ 65 Buchanan.......1145) 6270 1091.1) 490161) 122) 77) 80.108) 91) 51105| 345966 108,922 Butloneee cee |) O0NeATOs |. an. | 50) 20)....| 1) 8} 1} 4}...] 1) 24) 223) 3) 41 Caldwell.........| 95| 724 | 37.6] 27/ 16)....| 2| 6)...|...| 7|...| 124) 555) 15) 68 Gallaway<. 525-5: | 176, 1321 | 40.4) 200| 78] 5] 6) 14) 13) 51) 3) 4) 175) 993) 15/131 @amdenters.. 66.0: AA G260 erates: 1G [Be hee |e eee gael Shae | GO 489 nesina Cape Girardeau. .| 249) 616 | 1.4 8 5 1 2|...| 1)...| 105) 442) 23/207 @aproll!. 2); 5 ctts = | 280] 2529 | 345.2) 69] 30) 5] 4| 2) 1] 1] 1) 2} 5388/1719) 16/242 Carter...... 7} 233 | 1.1) 17 3}....|...| 10) 2)...]...] 1) 188) 95) 3) 3 Cassie es 132) 1308 | 99.2 87) 23} 2/ 3) 5) 2) 3) 13)...| 1211160, 5/121 Cedars qceeioe cs: [OO|b Y509)|Fe-rs20. ee 4azinaalie 4li1s|) eal) 10) e443), 12! 28) "459) s3\iss @aritonG 325... - | 167| 1292.| 26.7) 194] 19) 6] 1/ 13].../...| 12| 1] 144] 921] 10/146 Christian........| 51] 486 9.6| 78| 16, 7 1) 31 1|...| 81 | 387/ 3/ 44 Clare's 2 - | 28) 139 2.6, 6) 3] 4| 3) 2 1). 1) 3) 30) 83) 8 15 layers sf: | 154} 9463] 188.7/ 98) 37| 24) 14] 25] 17| 14/ 50) 22) 200 691) 21/119 @linton sh:sa ses: | 153; 7244] 47.6] 33| 39] 5] 3] 10) 1 2| 1] 97| 566] 11/120 Colors weet 54| 3173| 3.4) 66| 24| 4] 5] 18] 3] 7| 8| 2| 151| 99) 15| 27 Goopersi8) bac 122 1231 | 66.9) 80 47 2| 14] 23] 20, 1) 5| 3] 590 616) 23) 85 Crawford... -.... 233 3118} 48.3 91) 37, 9) 12) 7) 3) 17) 4..../ 4912270 33/181 Wadets cere re 31) 1128 AG) EG) @leocsllecailooellonollecol| Silo null ata) eeey) Oy Alay Dallaghyodss. 4 eae) 180), O8Aaiek aes. ie GU7| dle le ale || Sliysl sean 2561) 651). 5|49 Daviess vests 84, 679 | 20.4) 84] 31; 7} 6|124| 2} 2| 9] 4} 350) 319) 36| 44 Dekalbitoe oes: = 43| 325 9.6, 8 6. i] JA). ; 2-41) S).2|-110) 199] “si 30 Denteeeeee 154| 1259 4.4). . 53). 10). Ml @leoclecs|) AMmiby), ej flex Douglas 62% aan! sess oltre es | Brantley ee eae (es | me alliasn S| Peal che clean hears Danklineaey ese lees oe lose 0.6). . I eotorcl leek tel (ec ene pions Bega Franklin....:.. 79| 4853| 8.9] 97| 44| 4} 2/ 22! 8] 1| 2!...| 155] 246) 16] 47 Gasconade....... 68| 1213/ 1.7; 5] 4| SILIO alee 4| 116} 2| 17 Gentry si.'. yee se 93, 924 | 10.0} 26] 10 2} 9| 1| 2] 3|...| 312] 613] 22) 64 Greene: 46). 308) 46114) 295.3) 154/ 31) 209| 63] 29]...| 17) 46) 1/2155/2338) 46/174 Grund yy). =): 75| 605'| 28.2! 32) 9} 4) 3] 8|.-.|...| 3) 1) 206) 397] 11) 63 Marrisone;. «<1. LAO 7OOs 26) Sle 26/0 9ie ae lee aS ZI al ODIs 19|.6 70/7/71 "96 Henry.... 72) 461 | 19.7; 24|/ 11/ 3] 2) 5] 4}! 8] 6 3/ 136/ 300) 14] 49 Hickory.:.....:. 100, 737 OFS) 26) 16.9 3\y Sle--| S| 4) 3h...) 221) 525) .6) 82 Olt! Po sais ioe 459| 32053| 735.6| 194| 89} 5| 7| 22} 7| 9/ 10) 9/1221)1922) 79363 Howardael 122. 166| 1646 | 127.6] 93] 24; 2| 1) 19}...]... 7|...| 739| 744) 13/121 Howell see 463) 6257 | 151.52784'244 300 98| 2| 66134, 5| 41257213229 64289 (Cea te eee nee 123) 459 0.1| 182| 71; 3| 4) 21| 5| 5) 51. 58| 205. 9) 59 388 Missourt Agricultural Report. STATISTICAL SUMMARY—Continued. b + 4 uy by | A | oc Be cf Zi | 5 e A Acres of ¢ ¢ E/ ge | 82 | 2 |e] = (ge | Bis etl 2 to og fl BS a 7|@/e 2) 2. Apple | asl 3 | 5 4 P15 ry 2 a 8 a | Se o ole | eo l/#o/s|8)10/ 8 |g \treesover) | @ Saeeaes 22 =O || BS | 2 |) © Lat pie o | 8 years | 2 5 = Seal lexicl cod ee IA SEMA et iC) old. ay. [ee < Ge) ip eke Po |S ale telliek. Thee lite |; i | ae Ia ES | SS (ee Stacie 2): | 6 4 thee Vs 2 ais Ole 5: ll g @ limo et ae lleeeoiel| Ss |eCmmOn ieee [cee ile : ie aliazp ese) CR no el |) ch We ieee ciel e & | os 5 Saleen | Sa. lesen ee | ales | 2 | 8 e AS Sheer ier lt oie | ae | AS 26 aS Z en Sule : Jacksons aoe eee | 228] 3963 | 304.8) 268] 80) 23) 11] 79} 22) 14| 67| 5)/1252/2460) 61/126 JASPCL.- ne ||) Loo OS4: 0.3) 20) 12) 257) 47) 16) 1) 10) 10) 8| 57| 576) 14) 81 Jeflerson\)... =>.) | 65] 267 7.2} 101) 30) 28) 21) 11) 16) 28) 4] 1} 10) 143) 8 24 JOHNSONeeere hee | 68) 744 14.0} 30) 13 PAY Al alls) i) allt 77| 653} 3} 60 1eGIXO>- 4| 98) 6) 6) 136) 539) 13)°75 Millers. heesege- 126) sol 0.2} 44] 25) 3 7| 2| 6| 2] 1) 129] 532/- 9) 85 INTISSISSIP Dis. eee etna lee aha calicce Reagent ae Fan Phe ec octee | atest eer hall ene ad | ota rc, (al cell ateeletee lhe rors Moniteau-s. --e4|) 22) 288 37 ee ZO aT MT Seal le Se Allee | 65| 218} 4| 8 IMONTOC re ens 63) 654 Uisye2k) yl | 7/ SN PAG Ge eo. aye 8} 640, 1) 60 Montgomery...... OE KO) || UBS) BM) las ocllo oe | 19] 1)...| 5]...] 105) 187| 10) 55 Morante acerh: 75| 508 O29) - 2h ers rq | Gp SA, Tat | 95] 405| 7| 59 New Madrid..... ae Iie Paes | a gh eee Atenas atone Ie Ihe Sal eae | Vey a] ee Pasa (AE full a Boe INewtoule eee err 518] 3010 | 26.1] 465/109, 905/270! 17\197| 85| 55| 8| 755/1861) 52|173 Nodaway..... 350) 1951 Ge UPA Zo eholl sion ils 5 1) | 571/1367| 45|286 Oregon. enc 112) 458 20.02588) 82; 26) Sis) 1 20) | 236) 27/ 18) 3 OBNED-cocasouconl| Gi Wea 4.1) 53) 32 LLG |2 5 | eal a 8| 93] 6 28 Ozark Aran ater: NG) SKB fs 64 on 31| 13 ee ees ee Cais | eee |e pose Palle 6 iPemiscoteeeeinr: re |W Srcanl| eaten. 3 ; ally [PR I ieee oe peree lemma I ei POEL Yyites oi sc. chanrons 130; 249 21.6) 15) 29 S|) si 6) 3 8 25| 169} 7/106 IP6ttisee cos. ate 120} 682 35.0) 55) 26] 17; 8) 41) 2| 7:12) 3) 153) 512) 22) 96 Phelps yaar 61| 506 19.7 6| 3 Ole aaa Shanes 37| 430) 4| 51 IPUEC RE patch cus totene 238) 1732 56.3} 161] 57| 16] 11/151| 4| 2) 11/ 10 531 1067 39 202 Platter ane 349) 3025 | 620.1) 331) 85 5 8) yy ali 1| 1015211415) 83 254 (POMC Ya rene ces eater 118) 832 26.1; 13) 10 All marl 1} 5) 2] 1} 198) 562) 13)107 Pulaskt.. 4): ches. 102) 1175 | 16.0) 89} 15). 2) 6lcc| 4 148 918) 9 89 Pitre aeep sects: 30| 197 PSA) | ones TL eves eu lesee aes ee Ty il 10 175 1 28 Va Shae ae eciereneralelL to | eLa2 41.9} 103] 34 4| 4] 35) 2) 3] 6) 9} 805) 610} 39) 96 Randolphijee. rere 55| 544 18.7 96 OP e2e 3 tay) aL 79| 465) 6) 49 RUBY ine a) photo vated 88] 651 | 214.7| 38) 14 Sie 2} 3] 8] 1] 150) 479} 9) 76 Reynolds eee fey Bish lob oa oo 97) 31 PAV |) aM ee Ae 18} 262) 4! 71 Ripley wc We ekcwer 168) 433 0.8) 413/123 OM ele22\) 21023 21 alieol|rs12)220on Ste@harlesiannc 148) 1399 OCH AUS MAS eae 29| 48]...| 5 237/1152| 20)111 StiiClairy 6a. Sere 64| 558 10.9} 42) 30 Ge Sheer S| SS IS EAST eS ees St. Brancoispaees-1 OT 4800 |ereirenet 228| 47 8} 6} 21) 25) 15) 17) 1) 105) 259] 13) 73 Ste. Genevieve shel evalleneyate ous Que. oS a bee AES See eccla rouleea cee Stes IBY ES 5 Bons 252} 616 6.0) 703/190) 150115) 50) 92) 97| 88) 41| 291) 258) 77) 74 Saline esi ener 173) 1230 40.8} 53) 30 PEN ZU A eS Coys od allssn tl) “cevoy- 8) aba Oy. Schurylersy.ncereen 41| 140 (gi 9) 11 TNS a) ye aie abl 22) 103} 12) 41 Scotland. ee.) 29 88 0.1 taaeG\ts Th) all eas Sl esis aie29 Missourt State Board of Horticulture. 389 STATISTICAL SUMMARY—Continued. Z oe Wa es | 4 Py wy Acres of ¢ g B| os | @8 | ¢/8) ¢ |¢8|)———_~_________|5| 5 lei |e Belo & ie | oO!) wa | a e| 8 2/5 ae | 6|e| 6 |gsiei/+|/s\e|s | Apple |a/ 2 o | &5 CLE lane! o |@5|8|8| 5 | 8 | & |treesover| a) a 2 | ?s8 mao ei/S5]/ =| 82/5) e)/ 31/5] Syears|a2/| p | > Sa ch CMe g| Seo ae Le | Seale olds ts) 2S = oS IOS ee come | iersir lets ie! Sim ips: tere [Ng lea ee ES =A le) =p | 2 rs) 5 pe tule = == lset n ct OF | & | ag ahdq : e) a wD | 2 2 Se | cles s (8 |e eed ie) 3 3 , Bo | ° g O°*|. @ ie ; : ra len : £ g A EGR | A |S ml. Bl : anes © 5 2 ey | ois || @ |: | : O S 2 zh] oem mcieea |: | Gait elem aula ee) SSO ai ee ee ale | | eal | Scotiessaqse4:- | 260085 | 0.7) O53i 05). 0 ..-/) 915) 12) 2), 2.) 23) 58] 8/26 Shannonkees ae 194) 1418 3.3] 202) 65) 10] 22) 11) 17| 40|...| 1) 255/1148) 21/193 Shelbyenjeese cis 49| 285 9.3) 15) 6 3) 3/ 9)...|...) 4| 2) 84) 178) 4 24 Stoddard:......- LOW 504) so 2 | 180] 68) 17| 14) 15] 4) 5) 6| 5] 95] 310) 12) 75 Stoneeeee cee 78| 361 5.6| 79) 21) 36] 11) 81] 1). Meee) “S33 SR ey) Gil Sullivanssse0 o3ee 79| 397 2 OM Mae oes |eASt tet! 3) Th e61l) 325) 26/168 Taney eran Oa Aust wn a | 437| 67} 9] 3) 11/161] 4| 1)...| 75] 107| 7| 59 Texas emer. 534| 2988 | 40.0) 338/143]....|... TS eas sles 102774) 2509 Wernon eee ipo eos Srila rary eaiecolly 4 NE Slat (eine 3] 4| 217) 709) 1/ 53 Warren..........| 59] 344 8.1) 55] 20; 2) 4] 8| 6 2| 9) 4| 38| 224) 4) 40 Washington...... Sa] BOA sacs 196} 36) 2) 3] 75| 18] 3] 2|..-| 53} 204) 9) 63 Waynes’ 4:0 o:: av ZNO Ns gS sac | 34) 17 Ws i) TIO A esol! 20} Sal alli sy Webster enn a: 262| 3069 | 205.9] 61] 24) 2] 2) 3] 1|...| 2] 1) 301/2643) 9/234 WOLthenei ee 53| 229 IGN eG) Us| OE ee eee ee 2|...| 30] 191 3| 53 Witch teen | 266| 2569 | 307.6) 346/116) 14) 14| 53) 21) 12 13 7| 280/2185| 12/239 : ) } ) | ) Basket of Elberta Peaches from Southern Missouri. Missouri State Dairy Association. OFFICERS. President—Marshall Gordon, Columbia. First Vice-President—C. W. Kent, Kansas City. Second Vice-President—O. O. Harlan, Marionville. Treasurer—Rudolph Miller, Macon. Secretary—P. M. Brandt, Columbia. The program as given below was carried out: THURSDAY, JANUARY 15TH—ROOM 117, AGRICULTURAL BUILDING, 2:30 )e] xe The Selection of the Cow by Type, P. M. Brandt, in- structor in dairy husbandry, University of Missouri. The Co-operative Creamery in Missouri, E. G. Bennett, State Dairy Commissioner. Developing a Dairy Community, O. O. Harlan, Marionville Creamery Co., Marionville. FRIDAY, JANUARY 16TH—ROOM 117, AGRICULTURAL BUILDING, 1:30 P. M. Feeding for Milk Production, C. H. Eckles, professor dairy husbandry, University of Missouri. The Relation of a Creamery to Its Patrons, E. K. Slater, Blue Valley Creamery Co., St. Joseph, Mo. The Value of Cow-Testing Associations, Will Forbes, Dairy Division, Washington, D. C. The following premiums were awarded in the butter scoring contest: CREAMERY CLASS. Holden Creamery Company, first, score 95. amount $10.00; Marionville Creamery Company, score 93, amount $8.00; Pierce City Creamery Company, score 92, amount $6.00: Marceline Creamery Company, score 9014, amount $4.00. DAIRY CLASS. J. R. White & Son, first, score 9414, amount $5.00. (390) Missourt State Dairy Association. 391 There were twenty creameries exhibiting butter this year which made the largest exhibit shown in a number of years. The association voted to buy a $50.00 silver loving cup to be awarded to the owner of the cow making the best official record during 1914. This cup is to be awarded annually and must be won three successive years before it can be retained permanently by any one winner. The association urged the State Fair Board to make larger appropriations for premiums in dairy cattle classes. But to sell -them as ““straights’’ was impossible as the retailer would ask questions and refuse them, so they would have to go as “No. 2” and thus realize a lower price than would otherwise be the case. These last objections would be met by using a neat, attractive package and by stamping the package only. Parcel Post.—At present the shipping by parcel post is rather expensive. The postage costs’ about three cents a dozen, the package another cent and there is quite a deal of labor required. To send the eggs by freight just costs a fraction of this, being about half a cent a dozen. To hold customers by parcel post, asteady egg production is required. This condition is one hard to meet. Again, an unduly large proportion of the eggs are broken or damaged by parcel post. Conclusions.—The real benefit derived from the co-opera- tive eggs eircles is not so much in their successful operation in itself, but from the increased interest taken in poultry by the farmers. In Ontario, from a careful census taken of 448 farms, about two-thirds of the farmers were either indifferent or un- interested in poultry. To get these men interested in poultry is a greater thing than the success of the egg circle in bringing increased profits to its members. To receive the greatest benefits from co-operative market- ing we must organize a central society. Then we must operate or rent space in a cold storage plant and store eggs. A thirty- dozen case of eggs can be kept in cold storage for a space of six months for thirty to thirty-five cents. A broker will sell them for a commission of one-half acent.a dozen. Freight charges will bring this cost up to a total of two cents a dozen. If we can place eggs in cold storage at twenty-two cents a dozen and sell for twenty-four cents we can produce for “he farmer a handsome return for his eggs. 444 Missourt Agricultural Report. INCREASING THE WINTER EGG YIELD. (Prof. H. L. Kempster.) The problem of the person keeping hens is how to get eggs when prices are high. During the winter hens seem to possess a lack of inclination to produce. The successful poultry- man is the one who solves this problem. He who solves it best is the most successful. There are many factors entering into this problem. A casual glance at some will perhaps direct our attention to the mistakes made and assist in their future avoidance. In the first place, let us realize this fact: Commercial poultrymen do not expect large egg returns from last year’s hens. A hen goes into the molt in late summer and fall. She does not produce a crop of feathers and eggs at the same time, so that while the new plumage is being grown there is a cessation in the production of eggs. Hens during their second year lay on an average of two dozen eggs less than pullets. This number is taken out during the winter production. It is unusual for hens to produce liberally during December and January. From the standpoint of breeding this is highly desirable, but not from the standpoint of winter egg production. It is from pullets, then, that winter eggs are expected, and in order for pullets to lay it is necessary that they be completely developed. The time of hatching is an important factor. They should commence laying in November and December, and, if properly taken care of, will continue to produce eggs all winter. HATCH EARLY. The great fault with farmers is that they do not hatch early enough. With good care it requires six months or more for Leghorns to develop to maturity. Heavier breeds require from a month to six weeks longer. To be able to mature a pullet before November 1st necessitates hatching not later than June Ist for Leghorns and May 15th to 30th for the other breeds. The concensus of opinion is that April and the first part of May is the best time to hatch. Not only is it the most desirable time of the year from the standpoint of growing the chicks, but it is absolutely necessary if the poultryman expects winter eggs. One point should be considered, and that is the danger of hatching too early. Particularly is this true of Leghorns. : Poultry Meeting at Columbia. 445 A bird should not commence laying in September. When a pullet lays at that time of the year there is a great probability that she will go into a fall molt. If this occurs the hen has a vacation for three months just at the time when winter eggs are expected. Avoid the fall molt by hatching at the right time. Obtain winter eggs by developing the bird so that she commences laying in November and early December. Another point that should be taken into consideration is that of the breed itself. Some hens are born to lay, some are not. The writer kept two flocks side by side, same age, same house, same care; one flock produced on an average of one hundred and twenty eggs in a year. The other produced on an average of seventy. The only difference in the two flocks is that one had inherited from its ancestors the faculty to produce eggs, the other had not. Having considered the factors other than the care of the hens, let us now take up this question: By November 1st the birds should be placed in winter quarters. The house previous to this should be thoroughly cleaned and precautions should be taken to see that the house is dry, free from cracks, com- fortable, well ventilated and with plenty of light. The floor should be covered with at least a foot of straw so that the birds are compelled to exercise for their food. Pullets should not be confined with hens if it is possible to make other arrange- ments. The hens always overrun strange birds, make it un- pleasant, thus checking the pullet’s growth. THE BEE D: One of the first principles of poultry feeding is that poultry will not do well if fed on a grain ration alone. The feeding of grains alone is too great tax on the digestive apparatus of the fowl. Too much energy will be taken up in digesting the food and less will remain for the production of eggs. The writer has observed a large number of flocks which were not only deficient in egg production, but also were impaired in. health because of this practice. In addition, a ration of grains does not possess the required food nutrients in their proper proportions. To correct the first fault ground feeds should be fed and in the proportion of one- half as much ground food as whole grains. To correct the second it is necessary to supply those foods necessary for the produc- tion of eggs. Wheeler of the New York Experiment Station 446 Missourt Agricultural Report. has supplied the following information: When laying, a 3 to 5-pound hen requires for every one hundred pounds of live weight, or in other words, 20 to 25 birds, 5.5 pounds dry matter, 0.3 of a pound ash, 1.0 pound protein, 3.75 pounds carbohydrates, 0:35 pound, fat: Wheat, which is considered one of the best poultry foods, possesses 5.5 pounds dry matter, 0.09. of a pound of ash, 0.62 of a pound of protein, 4.25 pounds of carbohydrates, 0.1 of a pound of fat. About three-quarters of the ration is used in supplying the food nutrients necessary for maintaining the body, the other fourth is given over to the production of eggs. If the hen eats four ounces of wheat a day and one quarter is used in the production of eggs, what would be the result? One ounce of wheat has one-tenth of an ounce of protein. An egg contains one-fourth of an ounce of protein; so the hen would have enough protein for an egg every two and one-half days. Figuring the same on ash, it would have enough to pro- duce an egg every twelve days. It would have an excess of the other food requirements. This shows that it is poor economy to feed a grain ration or a combination of grains and ground feeds, because they alone are not of a nature to furnish the needs of the hen. Other grains, such as corn, would show a greater difference. NEED OF PROTEIN FOODS. It is necessary, then, to add something to the ration to balance it up. This is done by adding foods high in protein. For efficient production of eggs one must feed some such food. Foods which are suggested and used are linseed meal, meat foods, such as beef scrap, meat meal, etc., buttermilk, skim milk, and occasionally milk, albumen and fish scraps. The following is a good ration for egg production: Grain—Corn and wheat, equal parts. Mash—Bran, middlings, 2 parts each; corn meal, beef scrap, ie pares Twice as much grain should be fed as ground food. Another suggested ration is corn and wheat, equal parts, and oatmeal—ground fine with part of the hulls removed— buttermilk or skim milk, in addition to water for drink. In all cases grit and oyster shell should be kept where the birds may have access to them at all times. Failure to supply this will result in a less number of eggs or soft-shelled eggs. Clean, Poultry Meeting at Columbia. 447 fresh water should be kept before the birds at all times. The egg is sixty-five per cent water and the bird requires large amounts. Green food should always be supplied, especially in the winter. It assists in keeping the digestion perfect and is claimed by some to make the digestion of other foods more efficient. Green food may be supplied by feeding sprouted oats (all the birds will eat), cabbage, hung up in the pens so the birds can peck it, wurtzels, clover hay steamed or soaked over night, alfalfa, etc. Lack of green food also results in pale-colored yolks, an objection to some who cater to a fancy trade. METHOD OF FEEDING. Poultry feeding depends quite largely on the individual feeder. He should gain the confidence of the hens; should treat them in such a manner that they are not excited. He should understand their needs and cater to their tastes. In other words, as much depends upon the feeder as upon the feed. He should appreciate the hen’s nature, and by varying the ration keep the birds on edge. One of the great factors is compelling the birds to be active. Unless a bird keeps busy there is danger of her becoming too fat. This checks the circulation of blood in the ovary and lessens the number of eggs. The feeding should be liberal. Unless a hen has some fat she will not lay. To feed enough so that this condition exists and not have the hen too fat is the problem that the successful feeder has solved. In the morning feed grain. Bury it deep in the litter. This induces exercise. At noon feed the mash dry. This can be done by opening the dry mash hopper or feeding a definite amount in a trough. At night feed grain, all the birds will eat. Let no bird go to roost unless its crop is full. A few visits to the henhouse after the birds have gone to roost will indicate whether the correct amount is being fed. They should be fed all that they will consume and yet be kept active. Some people feed the ground feeds as a wet mash. It requires greater skill to do this than to feed dry feeds. A little wet mash, however, is desirable. This also affords the feeder a chance to vary the ration. The feeding of wet mash should be limited. The amount fed should not satisfy the bird’s hunger, but rather stimulate it. A hand- 448 Missourt Agricultural Report. ful of wet mash to every four birds will cause them to become active and more of the dry mash will be eaten as a result. In conclusion, the writer wishes to emphasize the im- portance of skim milk and buttermilk for egg-producing rations. Experiments tend to prove that more economical results are obtained with their use. Changes in the rations should be made gradually. There is no best way to get results, but the suggestions given will aid materially in ‘increasing the egg yield. Missouri Women Farmers’ Club. OFFICERS. President—Miss Pearle Mitchell, Rocheport. Vice-President—Mrs. Rosa Russell Ingels, Columbia. Secretary—Mrs. Maude M. Griffith Wood, Harrisonville. Treasurer—Mrs. R. B. D. Simonson, Jefferson City. MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS OF ANNUAL MEETING. (Mrs. Maude M. Griffith Wood, Harrisonville, Mo.) The Missouri Women Farmers’ Club met in regular session in the agricultural building, Columbia, Mo., at 3 p. m. Jan- uary 14, 1914. The meeting was called to order by the president, Miss Pearle Mit- chell of Rocheport, after which the min- utes of the last meeting, held in Columbia January 14 to 16, 1913, were read by the secretary. -The president’s address came next in order and was full of hope and enthusiasm for the future. Mrs. Maude M. Griffith Prof. D. H. Doane of the farm manage- god: ment department, University of Missouri, was present and gave an excellent talk on “‘How to Make a Barmy Pay:? Miss Ida Fischer of Shenandoah, Iowa, our associate mem- ber from across the line, was unable to be present, but sent her paper, “‘Farm Labor in Other States,’’ which the secretary read before the club. Miss Fischer took a more optimistic view of the labor question than do most of the Missouri women farmers. Mrs. Ingles with a very interesting talk closed the first day’s program. On Thursday, January 15th, the afternoon meeting was called to order at 2 o’clock instead of 3 o’clock. Prof. A. J. Meyer, assistant to Dean F. B. Mumford, Missouri College of A—29 (449) 450 Missourt Agricultural Report. Agriculture, again delighted the women farmers with an excel- lent talk. He discussed the scholarship question at length and gave his idea as to future work of women in agriculture. Dean F. B. Mumford honored the women farmers with a visit and gave a very interesting talk. Mrs. Turner McBaine of Columbia then told of her ex- perience with share tenants. Miss Alice Kinney of New Prankin discussed at length some of the labor-saving devices of advantage on the farm. Miss Adella Blew of Montrose gave her report as delegate to the International Congress of Farm Women at Tulsa, Okla. Friday, January 16th, the club convened at 2 p. m. as on previous day. The program was opened by Miss Laura Bur- roughs of Columbia, who spoke on “‘Why I Stayed on the am mee, Mrs. Maude M. Griffith Wood then gave a report of the Women Farm Managers’ Association which was organized at Tulsa, Okla., last October. A telegram from Mrs. Mabel Miller of Osceola was read bearing greetings and a motion to increase dues. There was no second to the motion. The question of national federation than came up for dis- cussion. It was voted to join the National Federation of Women’s Clubs, and the secretary instructed to look after the same. The delegates to Chicago convention were named as fol- lows: Miss Mitchell, with Mrs. Ingles and Miss Blew as alternates. The program for next year was then generally discussed by the club, after which came the election of officers. Miss Blew of Montrose hastened matters materially by a motion to re-elect by acclamation the present officers. Motion prevailed. Thursday, at 12:30 o’clock, the club met at Pemberton hall for the annual dinner. At this time a motion was made and carried to the effect that the secretary be instructed to send a letter of greeting to Mrs. Simonson of Louisiana, who was unable to be present owing to the illness of her only son. Four new members came into the club during our stay in Columbia. On Friday the club adjourned to meet at the call of the president. Missourt Women Farmers’ Club. 451 PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. (Miss Pearle Mitchell, Rocheport.) The Missouri Women Farmers’ Club is celebrating its third anniversary. From five members, timidly uniting for mutual benefit, it has now twenty-five active, energetic women who are earnest tillers of the soil. They are intelligently and profit- ably managing their farms and are fullfilling the duties of citizen- ship. The club members are not neglecting home or any work that is peculiarly that of women because they have chosen the profession of agriculture. Motherhood, home making and philanthropy are inherent, and however full her hands and time, the feminine nature will not allow a disregard of these highest claims. The influence of the Missouri Women Farmers’ Club has found an echo in many states of the Union, which culminated in November in an organization at Tulsa, Okla., during the International Congress of Farm Women, of a national organiza- tion of women farmers to be known as “‘The National Asso- ciation of Women Farm Managers.’ I am constantly receiving letters of inquiry regarding our club from individuals and the press. All this means that women farmers have found their place in the world’s activities and are being recognized as among those whose faithful attention to a chosen vocation has brought SUCCESS. The scholarship we have offered to the girl who will make good in the study of agriculture has aroused much interest. Other colleges have investigated its results and many inquiries from young women come to me. The report of this club at the meeting of the Missouri Federation of Clubs last year introduced us to that great body of workers, and many were curious and interested in knowing of this practical branch of woman’s work. I have mentioned a few of the things resulting from our organization, and you ‘must hear of some things we have not done. We have not reached the hundreds of women farmers in our State who should be allied with our club. We have not shown the proper zeal in regard to bringing the results of our year’s experience here for discussion, which is necessary. Each one of us has not added a name to the roll of membership ‘as agreed upon last year at our delightful round table. Is this lack of enthusiasm 452 Missouri Agricultural Report. on \ \ In this group are most of the officers of the Missouri Women Farmers’ Club. or the strenous demands of varied interests? I prefer to believe the latter true. My friends, I beg of you to bring the same earnestness to hand that has made you so useful in the propaganda of suffrage, or your church’s welfare, or the literary clubs to which you belong—then our roster will increase and our attendance like- wise. Missouri Women Farmers’ Club. 453 During these sessions I urge that we consider the vital problem of farm labor. Perhaps some one may offer a solution, for it confronts us as a constantly growing obstacle. Are we doing our part toward building or encouraging good roads? We have wide opportunities in this line, for women are wont to carry through what they undertake. Let us insist upon properly graded roads and frequent use of the road drag, though we should, like one woman farmer in Callaway county, set the example by doing the work ourselves. More and more am I convinced that we do not watch carefully enough the by-products of the farm—how many of us let the wheat straw rot instead of baling it, or leave the windfallen apples decaying on the ground—our gardens should give some surplus to the markets while the house and poultry products should help keep up the household expenses. Our repeated drouths force us to think of the conservation of mois- ture. The destruction of the forest has removed one great means of retaining moisture preserved by leaves. The intro- duction of deep wells instead of ponds has eliminated the opportunity for evaporation afforded by the big body of water which returned to us in showers. We are consequently forced more and more into the practice of ‘“‘dry farming,”’ experiences which I hope we will be able to discuss during this meeting. One most important subject for our consideration is organ- ized co-operation among farmers. There is yearly increasing necessity for it, forced upon us largely by the increasing lack of business integrity. It is my belief that not until the con- sumer and producer meet as buyer and seller, or operate through a farmers’ market, will the cost of living be reduced. The farmer gets no better prices than the expense of producing the ‘foodstuffs demands. Hence one must look to the much hand- ling of the same for the reason of its increased cost to the con- sumer, unless perhaps we except eggs, when the hens go on a prolonged strike, as has been the case this winter. However, even then these hens were eating corn at 80 cents a bushel, wheat at 95 cents a bushel and other things in proportion— so eggs had to be high to pay their keep. These are all problems for the women farmers. They are part of our business. We are here to take council together, to help each other, and to lay upon each of you the responsibility of co-operation and fraternity as represented by the Missouri Women Farmers’ Club. 454 Missourt Agricultural Report. REPORT OF WOMEN FARM MANAGERS’ ASSOCIATION. (Mrs. Maude M. Griffith Wood.) At Tulsa, Okla., was born the second organization which has to do exclusively with the interests of women farmers, viz., the Women Farm Managers’ Association, which is a national organization. ‘ This unique organization is the direct outgrowth of the influence of the Missouri Women Farmers’ Club through the efforts of its president, Miss Pearle Mitchell, and the interest of Mrs. Clark Kelley of Devil’s Lake, N. Dak. The Missouri Women Farmers’ Club has been the subject of much interest and comment, not alone in Missouri, but throughout the United States. Women from various states as well as persons interested in agriculture have written repeatedly for our constitution and for information as to working plans of the club. In many states numerous women farmers have made themselves known. At Tulsa, Okla., during the con- vention of International Congress of Farm Women, the women farmers were given one whole program. At this time there were women farmers present from nine states, and all seemed anxious that some sort of a national organization be formed. As a result, owing to lack of time only temporary organization was effected and temporary officers elected, with the under- standing that next year we would meet with the International Congress of Farm Women at Wichita, Kan., and perfect a per- manent organization. Mrs. Kelley of North Dakota was made temporary president; Mrs. Belle v’D. Harbert of Magnolia, Col., president of the International Congress of Farm Women, temporary vice-president, and Miss Pearle Mitchell of Missouri, temporary secretary. There were representative women from the following states: Oklahoma, Missouri, Illinois, North Dakota, Michigan, Colorado, California, Idaho and Arkansas. Many of these women are very strong characters in their respective states and are recognized as financiers. They also represent the various lines of agriculture. Mrs. Fred Osborn of Ann Arbor, Mich., is a prominent vegetable gardener and is the only lady who is member of the National Vegetable Growers’ Association. She cultivates large tracts of celery just in the suburbs of Ann Arbor and handles vegetables in wholesale lots. Mrs. Clark Missourt Women Farmers’ Club. 455 Kelley of Devil’s Lake, N. Dak., is recognized throughout the state as one of the financiers and business managers of the day. Another Mrs. Kelley of White Hall, Ill., has built up a sub- stantial poultry business, and I take if for granted that we all know that some of our Missouri women have done equally as well. Great interest and enthusiasm was manifested, not only by the press, but by the persons interested in the agricultural world when it became known at Tulsa that such an organiza- tion of which I have just spoken had been planned. Many and great were the things predicted for the future of the or- ganization. I trust that every member of the Missouri Women Farmers’ Club may be present at Wichita next October and have a voice in perfecting a permanent organization. FARM LABOR IN OTHER STATES. (Ida M. Fischer, Shenandoah, Iowa.) One of the hardest problems the farmer has to face is that of labor. And the problems of the woman farmer in this regard are not different from those of her fellow farmers. The conditions with which I am most familiar are those that prevail throughout the corn-belt states, and it is to conditions of farm labor in these states that I shall confine myself. One way or another, every farmer manages to get along with or without the labor he needs. Many a farmer is obliged to give up his plan of farm management because he is unable to get as much or as efficient labor as he would like. Many farmers are changing from the one or two-crop systems to a system that includes cattle feeding, sheep feeding, hog raising or dairying, so that having efficient labor they can keep it em- ployed with a profit the year round. With corn, wheat, oats and hay only as principal crops, there is a great demand for labor during June, July and part of August, with a lull until September, when fall plowing and the sowing of winter wheat again increases the demand. In November and December— corn-gathering time—comes another period of demand. From that time until spring opens the grain farmer has a period of comparative rest—a period in which he perhaps employs no extra labor at all. On the other hand, the combined grain and stock farmer or feeder finds it necessary to keep at least one extra man for every 160 acres. Even with such an arrangement 456 Missouri Agricultural Report. it is no easy matter to plan farm work to distribute labor equally throughout the year, as any farmer knows who has corn to “lay by,’ alfalfa, oats and winter wheat to cut, all at the same time. Fortunate is the man who has sons of his own to carry on the labor of his farm or can borrow the sons of his neighbors. If he must depend upon the man whois here today and there tomorrow, his grievances are indeed many. It behooves the farmer, therefore, to so manage his farm that having found an efficient man he can keep him the year around. The fact of the matter is that the efficient man is not one who is here today and there tomorrow. Such a life is to him neither pleasant nor profitable. The short time work is then left largely to the man who is not so capable. As to wages, the efficient man rarely receives all he is worth, whereas the inefficient man always receives more than he is worth. Both receive the wages customary in that com- munity, which may vary from $1 to $3.50 per day or from $25 to $45 per month. In one community a man may receive $35 per month, have his horse or his horses fed and shed room pro- vided for his buggy. In another community he may receive $30 per month and not be permitted to have a horse of his own nor the use of one of his employer’s horses. Some farmers have found it to their advantage to build comfortable cottages for the use of the married man and his family, and have given a garden spot, milk and eggs for family use. In many instances this arrangement has proved satis- factory both to the farmer and to his man. In other instances it has not proved satisfactory, as is shown by the empty cottages that are to be seen as one drives along the country roads. Some of you may have read the interesting and amusing discussion that was carried on in the Breeders’ Gazette during the past year in regard to the proper housing and treatment of the hired man. The discussion was opened by a woman whose description of the table manners of the hired men she had known equaled some of the descriptions of farm life as they appear in Hamlin Garland’s ‘“‘Main Traveled Roads.” The discussion was closed with the remark that the only thing necessary to do in any case is to observe the Golden Rule, ““Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” It is safe to say that where this rule is observed by all parties concerned there is no great problem of farm labor. Missourt Women Farmers’ Club. 457 THE INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF FARM WOMEN HELD AT TULSA, OKLAHOMA. (Miss D. Adella Blew, Montrose, Mo.) I assure you it was a great pleasure to represent the Mis- souri Women Farmers’ Club at the International Congress of Farm Women. And I will take this opportunity to thank you for both the honor and the privilege. The International Dry Farming Congress and the International Congress of Farm Women, together with the International Soil Produce Exposi- tion, made the last week of October a great week for Tulsa, Okla., and a splendid school of instruction for her thousands of visitors and delegates. The most important of these, to us, was the International Congress of Farm Women. I received many impressions and learned many things which I would like to bring back to you. One is the great need and value of the organization of our farm women. The Ameri- can farm woman is not awake to her responsibilities nor living up to her possibilities. The women of the European countries have far surpassed us—they are most thoroughly and efficiently organized in their efforts to promote better rural conditions. Their organizations are officially recognized by their respective governments and oftentimes given financial aid and support. The great European International Congress of Farm Women, held at Ghent, Belgium, last year, was financed by the govern- ment of that progressive little kingdom, and in a most splendid way. Instead of taking the Congress to some large church or auditorium—as we do in America—the government had erected a number of spacious buildings and most splendidly equipped them for the use of the International Congress of Farm Women. Our president, Mrs. Belle v’D. Harbert, who attended this congress at her own expense, representing the American Women’s Congress, told us she was simply amazed at what she saw and learned. Instead of a few hundred delegates, as we have, their delegation numbered into the thousands, and twenty different nations were represented. We of the American International Congress of Farm Women are hoping and believing that the time will come when our — congress will be officially recognized by our United States Government and become a connecting link between its Depart- A—30 458 Missourt Agricultural Report. ment of Agriculture and the woman on the farm. The need of such a link was demonstrated when Miss Marie Willoughby, official from the United States Department of Agriculture, in her address told us of the letter Secretary Houston had sent out to the farm women asking how this department could be more helpful to them. The fact was here revealed that few of our farm women had seen or heard anything of this very im- portant letter. One of our women rather wittingly remarked that a directory of farm women be furnished Secretary Houston, that hereafter when he wanted to communicate with farm women he would know to whom to address his letters. Miss Willoughby urged the women to answer this letter. The International Congress of Farm Women also instructed its pres- ident and secretary to write an official letter to Secretary Hous- ton asking, first, that a bureau be established devoted to the interests of the farm women; second, that a traveling school be provided for the rural communities; third, aid in establishing the Red Cross rural nursing service in the rural districts, that it may be possible for these communities to have skilled nurses to care for their sick and who could teach, not only the chil- dren in the schools, but also the mothers in the home the laws of hygiene, the care of the sick and the proper feeding of chil- dren, etc.; fourth, to ask for such an arrangement and classifi- cation of the information and bulletins already compiled by the department that they will be more accessible to the farm women. Much of the investigation the department has made in the interests of better homes and better living, and its many valuable bulletins are practically useless because unavailable to the average housewife, who either does not know of them or how to get them. The congress urged the farm women who were desirous of better rural conditions to write Secretary Houston and express their wishes. The letter had to be in by November 15th. And it is hoped many saw the wisdom of asking for the things suggested by the International Congress of Farm Women, as in unity there is strength. We are going to get what we want when we want it bad enough—you know women always do. If, as a recent correspondent wrote Secretary Houston, that “the ‘farm woman’ has been the most neglected factor in the rural problem and she has been especially neglected by the National Department of Agriculture’ is true—and we believe Missouri Women Farmers’ Club. 459 it is—isn’t the farm woman a wee bit responsible for it as well as man to blame? Heretofore she has not taken time to think of, much less insist, that the world appreciates the economic value of the farmer’s wife and the important factor she is in the world’s work. Surely the farmer’s wife, who has given to the world its greatest wealth of brain and brawn and as keeper of the rural home from which come so many of our nation’s great men, merits the first thought and consideration of both family and state. The International Congress of Farm Women has no higher ambition than to be of real service to humanity by promoting the dignity, happiness and usefulness of the farm woman in her rural home. The third convention of the International Congress of Farm Women was held at Tulsa, Okla., October 27 to 31, 1913, in the First Presbyterian Church. The congress was formerly opened Monday afternoon, the president, Mrs. Belle v’D. Harbert of Magnolia, Col., presiding. The greater part of the afternoon was taken up by the several addresses of welcome and greetings brought us from foreign countries by their distinguished repre- sentatives. Governor Cruce brought us a message and a wel- come for the State of Oklahoma. Hon. W. R. Motherwell brought greetings from the International Dry Farming Congress. There were also greetings from many nations, including Brazil, Belgium, Hungary, China and Roumania. It is needless to say that both the man and the message of these distant countries were interesting and greatly appreciated. Tuesday, the second day of the congress, was crowded full of good things. The first address of the morning was by Dr. Edna Carver of Denver on “Keeping the Right Mental Atti- tude.’’ She explained the close and sympathetic relation existing between mind and body, and emphasized the fact that a well- poised, happy and contended mind plays an important part in maintaining the physical health of the body. Following Dr. Carver came Miss Fannie Clement, superintendent of Rural Nurses American Red Cross Association, Washington, D. C. In her address she told of the Red Cross rural nurses and their work and its relation to the child and value to childlife. So many infants die each year through a lack of proper care, feeding, etc., due to a lack of knowledge on the part of the mother. Dr. C. C. Allen, dean of the Kansas City Dental College, Kansas City, Mo., gave an address on “Oral Hygiene 460 Missouri Agricultural Report. and its Relation to the Child,” setting forth the necessity of caring for the teeth of the very young child. Tuesday after- noon Mrs. Marie T. Harvey, in an illustrated address, showed us the possibilities of the one-room school as an efficient insti- tution. Her pictures and talk would bid the discouraged teacher laboring under most adverse conditions to take heart and go to work for better things. Wednesday morning Miss Caroline Hunt of the nutrition investigation department of the United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., gave a very interesting and in- structive address on “The Art of Bill of Fare Making.”’ Thursday morning delegates and visitors to the Inter- national Congress of Farm Women experienced the pleasure of partaking of a breakfast scientifically prepared by Miss Hettie Starr, teacher of domestic science in the Edmond, Okla., Normal School. She cooked in full view of the audience, at the same time preparing the dinner meal (part of which was put to cook in a fireless cooker) and lecturing on the subject sis her, “Three Meals a Day.”’ Mrs. J. A. McKenzie of Alberta, Canada (sister of Mrs. Harbert), and who is manager of the Canadian Pacific Rail- road’s large poultry farm, gave a very interesting address on ““The Why and How of Poultry Raising as a Successful Business for the Farm,” ‘“‘Dairying and Its Place in the Farm Home,”’ “Dangers to Public Health from Public Milk Supplies and How to Control Them,”’ “‘Co-operation from the Producer’s Stand- point,” “‘Co-operation from the Consumer’s Standpoint,’’ ‘““The Furnishing of the Farm Home,’ and many other very inter- esting and vital questions to the farm woman were handled by men and women of national reputation. All phases of farm life—material, physical, mental, social and spiritual—were ably discussed. One of the finest things of the whole congress to me was the inspirational address given by Miss Jessie Fields of New York, national secretary of the Young Women’s Christian Association, on “‘The Life of the Rural Girl.’? In her address Miss Fields emphasized the need of the awakening and develop- ing of the rural girl into her best possibilities. To me it was a delight to know that at last the splendid organization of the Young Women’s Christian Association has seen the wisdom of reaching out and touching the life of the rural girl. Only a few years ago they did not deem Young Women’s Christian Associa- Missouri Women Farmers’ Club. 461 tion work practicable for the rural communities because of the lack of trained leaders. But the Young Women’s Christian Association will now send into communities desiring it a trained secretary to organize and supervise the work. Several rural communities, or even a whole county, may combine in paying the salaries of one of these trained secretaries to supervise the work with their young people. Another splendid address along a line similar to this yet different was given by Miss Anna Taft of New York on “The Church for Farm Girls and Boys.’’ In her address Miss Taft emphasized the fact that the church should be a vital force in the community at work, not only on Sunday, but every day in the week—helping people mentally and physically as well as spiritually. Our president, Mrs. Harbert, in her opening address and at other times during the convention told us many interesting things of her trip abroad, in the interest of the International Congress of Farm Women. She spoke of how delightfully she was received and entertained by the royalty and best people of the progressive little kingdom of Belgium; of how upon every occasion all honor was paid her as the American women’s representative. Mrs. Harbert re- mained abroad four months studying conditions of rural life in seven different European countries. She said the little kingdom of Belgium, whieh is only about one-sixth the size of Oklahoma, seems to have most ideal rural conditions and is the most beautiful agricultural country in the world. Prac- tically every foot of ground is in a high state of cultivation. They consider farming a profession, not for men only, but women also. The traveling schools play an important part in the life of these rural people. These schools are managed and supported by the government, and some of the finest scholars and instructors in their colleges and universities are sent out to conduct these schools, which vary in length from three weeks to four months. Not only the daughters, but the mothers and grandmothers go to school. And in the evenings the fathers attend the lectures on scientific farming and other kindred sub- jects. Mrs. Harbert paid a high compliment to the women of Belgium, who, she said, are essentially home women, and above all else, accomplished housekeepers. Yet the women of Bel- gium find time to study anything and everything for the better- ment of their country. Before the close of the convention Mrs. Belle v’D. Harbert, in her charming and sincere way, very beautifully expressed the gratitude and appreciation she felt 462 Missouri Agricultural Report. at the great honor conferred upon her by her re-election to the presidency of the International Congress of Farm Women. She voiced some of the high ideals cherished by the executive for the future of the congress in its broader and larger scope of work. Mrs. Harbert has been such a gracious and efficient execu- tive and has done so much to promote-the growth and power of the organization that the wisdom of her reelection as this splendid body’s head was unanimously conceded. Mrs. Belle v’D. Harbert is a woman so altogether gifted and charming that every one instinctively felt that she was the right woman in the right place. She was called upon to face many varied and difficult problems during those five days, but never once did tact and good judgment seem to fail her. The women of the United States and Canada may well congratulate themselves that a woman so intelligent and intensely interested in every problem of rural life and so efficient has been called to the front to champion their cause. The next and fourth International Congress of Farm Women is to be at Wichita, Kan., in October, 1914. And I hope you will every one plan to go and become a part of this splendid organization. If your home clubs have not yet done so, get them to federate with the International Congress of Farm Women. The federation fee is only one dollar per year; the fee has been kept small so as to bar none. The International Congress of Farm Women should become the recognized head of all farm women’s organizations. The time has come when the farm women of all America, expecially of the United States, should be glad and proud to stand together and become recog- nized as a distinct class whose interests and welfare are deserving of special recognition. I must not stop without telling you something of the social delight of this congress, for the recent International Congress of Farm Women was one of unusual social brilliancy. Each day a delightful social tea was given in the church parlors by one of Tulsa’s many splendid women’s clubs. A fitting climax to the social events of the week was the dinner party given by Mrs. Belle v’D. Harbert, president of the International Congress of Farm Women, and Mrs. S. V. McGreery, president of the Oklahoma division. The dinner was in honor of the official delegates fron foreign countries and the governors’ appointees from our several states. Those present from Missouri were Missouri Women Farmers’ Club. 463 Mesdames Harry Sneed and S. Stephens, Sedalia, and Maud Griffith Wood, Harrisonville, and Miss D. Adella Blew, Mont- rose. After the dinner the entire party attended the governor’s reception. A number of the diners stood in the receiving line, which numbered more than half a hundred honor guests, among whom were many foreign dignitaries and several army officers in uniform which added much to the spectacular brilliancy of the occasion. Friday the delegates were taken to the Page Orphan Home and shown other interesting things of Tulsa. That the familiar adage, ‘‘All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy,’ was appreciated by the people of Tulsa is applicable to farm women as well, was evidenced by the many delightful diversions pro- vided for them. Members of the international congresses departed for their homes feeling that Tulsa had indeed proved herself a very gracious and delightful hostess. Threshing English blue grass on farm of Mrs. Maude M. Griffith Wood. Missouri Sheep Breeders’ and Feeders’ Association: OFFICERS. President—E. B. Wilson, Stanberry. Vice-President—Lyle Atkins, Denton. Vice-President—J. L. Grigsby, Granville. Vice-President—W. D. Ashburn, Farmington. Secretary-Treasurer—Howard Hackedorn, Columbia. REPORT OF SECRETARY. (Howard Hackedorn.) The Missouri Sheep Breeders’ and Feed- ers’ Association held their annual meeting at Columbia January 13th and 14th during Farm- ers’ Week, 1914. a aise “Rear ac eer TETTEC] Cay 8°16 €°9GE F SLE | 6 TLE | 9° 9PE T O8€ G2 SOS ale ee eee ee UIOD “UTR | sures spunod QOT 10J poo, SATA Steen! Te: ep: ep: | ep: e): ey: ey: OIE 5-11 1¢~ 16° 6¢° 6c" | 6c" | 6S" | 6o° iio Eee a ota cote 2 as un oc.5 + ByegTW AcCo-O ID oeGuOn) & Biko CT: cl: | CI cL’ | GI‘ GAY pais el Ss MRS nan Te ae aeaeed TOO LUTE) Sear | 96 T oo T 96 'T 6.1 9c T SGT rel ie Soa es a seca ureis U10D | :pooj A[IVp ISVIOAY LYS" | add to the cream sauce grated cheese and sprinkle over the top grated cheese with or without bread crumbs. These are known as the “au gratin’ dishes. Some vegetables which contain a large amount of starch are after the original cooking put into the oven to brown the outside, for in this browning starch is dextrinized and a certain amount of flavor is devel- oped. Another way of bringing about this same result is by reheating the vegetable in hot fat as in frying'referred to above. In this case the vegetable is coated on the outside with some material such as egg, which prevents the absorption of fat. A few vevetables such as eggplant may be sauted after having been dipped in batter. Summarizing, we can state very briefly the principles which should be observed in cooking vegetables whatever the Missouri Home Makers’ Conference. 587 method may be: (1) All vegetables which contain large amounts of starch and cellulose must be cooked by means of the action of moist heat. (2) In order to retain the food value of the vegetable the liquid in which it is cooked should be as limited as possible and should, whenever possible, be re- tained and used in some way as food. (3) In retaining the natural flavor of the vegetable we must both keep the liquid which contains the soluble portion of the vegetable and also must cook them in such a manner as to retain as much as pos- sible of the volatile flavor. THE HOME IN HISTORY. (Mrs. Walter Warren, Sedalia.) From the beginning of time inventive ideas have held the kingship of the world. From man’s mind, as the ages sped, have been organized homes, society, government, laws, litera- ture, arts and commerce. The first home was a very simple and humble structure. When not a cave it was a shelter made of bark or skins sufficient to afford protection to the mother and the child. Subsequently it was a lodge made of earth, of stone wattle work or adobe. The first needs in this home were food, shelter and clothing. Food products were first used in the raw state, but woman’s inventive genius made a most important and far-reaching dis- covery, a method for artificially producing fire. The Greeks showed their appreciation of the value of this invention by asserting that it was stolen from heaven. Considering its many uses in heating and cooking, thereby adding to the comfort of man, we are not surprised that in certain parts of the world fire has always been considered sacred. No discovery after that of producing fire contributed more towards the development of mankind than the taming of the milk and fleece-bearing animals. The domestication of these diminished man’s labor as a burden bearer and made of him a herdsman. The monotony of the long-continued meat diet made the herdsman’s wife hungry for starchy foods; she began to save seed from certain plants and gradually evolved a garden. Generation after generation of her descendants picked over the grain patches, selecting the seeds to be preserved from the harvest festivals to the next spring’s planting time. These daughters 588 Missourt Agricultural Report. eeN partnership with God is motherhood; What strength, what purity, what self-control; What love, what wisdom, shall belong to her Who helps God fashion an immortal soul.”’ of the herdsman became the wives of farmers and in turn made farmers of their sons by placing in their hands the seeds of wheat and other cereals which gave to the family bread and nutritious foods. After building a home and establishing a fireplace for the preparation of foods woman’s next concern was for more raiment than that afforded by the traditional fig leaf. This she found in the bark of certain trees, in the fiber of hemp and cotton, and in the wool of sheep and goats. With her distaff she spun the thread thus obtained and was enabled by means of her loom to provide textile fabrics for herself and family. With a rude knife she skinned and carved the game brought by her male companion, scraped the interior of the hide and cut it up into clothing, sandals, and mocassins. There was much to invent before this home could be considered even fairly equipped. Furniture and culinary utensils were required, and a very im- Missourt Home Makers’ Conference. 589 portant part was played in domestic economy by the soapstone pot and native basketry. When we contemplate the splendid porcelain wares of today, the numberless varieties of cutlery, the beautiful textile fabrics, the delicate silks, the countless forms of footwear, the astonishing output of food products, we little think that the wheels of these vast and varied industries were set in motion by the needs and inventive ideas of a woman in a primitive home. The rude knife of flint has become the keen tool of tempered steel; the distaff has issued into the intricate Jacquard loom; the metate and pestle manipulated by a woman’s hands have by a long process of evolution developed into our mammoth roller mills, impelled by water power, steam or electricity. These wonderful changes are due to inventions and specialization of work which became possible only when men liberated from the avocations of hunting and warfare were able to take up other occupations and develop them in the manner with which we are now familiar. Primitive woman having a home, was cook, butcher, baker, potter, weaver, miller, tanner and furrier. Man, in assuming the occupations which were originally feminine and performed by one person, has subdivided and specialized by practical inventions and improved forms of machinery. So the work that is now done in a modern home is accomplished more rapidly and to better purpose and with correspondingly greater results in the development of industry and in the progress of civilization. This is an age of efficiency and specialization. We would not expect a farmer to be a success if he dabbled in law, in plumbing or salesmanship. Big men of today are all specialists, be they farmer, lawyer, doctor, minister or merchant. But what are the mother’s professions? She is the home- maker, care-taker, teacher, nurse, peace officer, minister and lawyer. The mistress of the rural home, in addition to filling these various occupations, not only supplies her own table with all its fresh vegetables, milk, butter, eggs and poultry, but pro- duces a surplus equal to the needs of a great city. Besides the care of her home and family she carries on a branch industry greater than the cattle business of the nation—for the poultry business is owned, managed and controlled almost exclusively by her. We never sit down to a meal but that the work of a farm woman is somewhere in evidence. But the physical and commercial products are her least contribution to mankind. 590 Missouri Agricultural Report. Three-fifths of the women of Missouri live in rural homes. Ninety per cent of the leading business of the cities come from these homes, as do eighty-eight per cent of the ministers and a like per cent of the leading educators and government officials. The farmer has been much concerned about the exodus of his boys to town. But a greater concern, the exodus of his girls, is facing him. Compared with the comfort of present-day households, the fabled palaces of ancient kings were mere hovels. While much has been done in improving the conditions under which farm women work, it remains for progressive farm men and farm women to better conditions by providing mechanical and labor-saving devices in farm homes. These practical inventions are the aids which are necessary to place the country woman’s work more nearly on par with that of the city woman’s. The introduction of a modern heating apparatus and some kind of a sanitary water system will do much to make the farm home more pleasant and healthful. The cream separator, the dumb-waiter, the roller table, the stove with glass doors, bread and cake mixers, the fireless cooker and its logical companion, the iceless refrigerator, will each lessen the steps and lighten the work of the housewife. Study of improved conditions on the farm have developed plans for the ultimate elimination of wash day. In districts having a community creamery the creamery is idle every other day. It has been demonstrated that machinery for a laundry can be installed and operated during the idle time so that the washing can be done at the creamery at but a slight expense to each farm. Labor has become such an important problem on the farm that the gasoline engine has become the new hired man that will perform such tasks as would require the service of both men and teams. This engine will drive the machine to fill the silo, grind the feed, saw the wood and thresh the grain. This chore boy is equally accommodating to the farm woman, for it will run the washing machine, the wringer, the cream separator, the pump, the sewing machine or vacuum cleaner. While the engine is doing all these chores it drives the dynamo which generates electricity and stores it in a battery making a complete farm electric lighting plant, from which the power can be used whenever and wherever desired. The house- wife finds her life brightened and duties lightened by electric lights and small motors. New uses for the power are found Missourt Home Makers’ Conference. 591 every day. Sometimes the dairy cows are milked and the cream separated from the milk by electricity; the dairy is ven- tilated, lighted, heated or cooled, all by electric power. Poultry farmers are finding that this power can be used to furnish heat for the incubator and the brooder. Electricity on the farm is a subject commanding much attention. Manufacturers are studying the farmer’s wants, and are making machinery to supply those wants. The National Government is investigating, the State colleges and experiment stations are helping the movement with information and advice. The possibilities are beyond count. The successful advent of the electric automobiles suggests the possible use of electric power in plowing, seeding, cultivating and harvesting. Electric farm trucks are made in America, and the general utilization of electric power in agriculture depends upon a better under- standing between the producer and the consumer as to the field of probable use. The consumer does not realize how much time, money and patience can be saved by the application of the new agent. Electricity is no longer a luxury, but is rapidly becoming a necessity to the farmer and the farmer’s wife. The yearbook of the Department of Agriculture calls attention to an awakening of the farmer, to the necessity of a machine-made farm. In certain parts of the country such an awakening seems to be already well advanced, and the steam engine, electric motor, gasoline engine, and particularly the oil-burning en- gines, are doing the work of opening up innumerable acres for cultivation. Not since Watt’s time has such a vast improve- ment in engines been made. The oil-burning engine consumes crude oil costing only a few cents a gallon, or any liquid fuel, and, like all great inventions, it is astonishingly simple. And it seems reasonable to predict that this simple and inexpensive engine will work as great a revolution in American agriculture as was worked by the automatic harvester. With horses, every plow needs a man, but with an oil engine two men can operate eighteen plows and hold control in their hands the power of eighty horses that never tire. Agriculture now as in the past is still the most important occupation, for it is here that the food that feeds and the raiment that clothes the world finds its first production. And any invention that lightens the load of the man who toils and enables him to reap a greater profit from his labors is of great benefit to humanity. But any movement for the lightening of the farmer’s work must, if it meets with 592 Missourt Agricultural Report. success, receive the support, not only of the farmer, but also of the farmer’s wife. The county farm bureau should include the women of the farm and their household problems in its scope. If these pro- gressive movements are to go forward the home must not be neglected. For on the home foundation is built all that is good in state or individual. Many farmers’ “wives do more reading than their husbands, and are more susceptible to suggestions, and are anxious and alert to make progress in their life work. The first problem of the farmer is how to increase farm prod- ucts through labor-saving devices and better farming. The first problem of the farmer’s wife is how to improve the con- dition of her home. The mistake of the husband in his sphere during one season may, with the aid of the farm adviser, be corrected in the next. The mistakes made by the wife in the home and in rearing her children are never entirely corrected. The woman is in greater need of expert advice than the man, and we should have a special county bureau for women, with a woman well trained in home economics at the head of it. Her expert advice would enable the wives and mothers to solve many home problems and make the home life more efficient. The future of most families depends upon the mother. She is the one who does much to make for the happiness and the health of her family, and it is her attitude toward the farm and her success in making a happy farm home that largely deter- mines whether the boy or girl remains on the farm. If the mother feels that the farm offers no future for the boy or girl the chances are that the farm will lose them. You may remember the little waif, Glory McGuire, as she looked through the window at rich children’s parties she would lament, Oh, the good times going on in the world and me not in them! Farm women want some of the good times. Is it fair for the cities to absorb all the talent or culture generated in the country and never send any of it back from whence it came? Seldom does a high official of church, school or state visit the rural districts except to draw more votes, more dollars or more chil- dren from the homes of the farmers. With good roads eliminating space, and with the telephone, country women want and can have social centers and neighbor- hood gatherings. They need domestic science, the neighbor- hood nurse, the traveling library and the up-to-date con- solidated district school and playground. All farm women have in a large degree the same experience, and therefore they Missourt Home Makers’ Conference. 593 can and should help each other. They should meet to discuss the problems of mutual interests, they should organize home- makers’ clubs with the object of securing the best of conditions in the schools, and in their home life, of broadening the outlook of the home, of encouraging the social spirit and of elevating the character of farm life. The rural teacher and the rural preacher should be very active in this social and educational work. Country schools should have teachers trained for work in rural schools, teachers of sound judgment, understanding the nature of the child, and tact in dealing with him. A live, trained progressive teacher can be a great force in a community in advancing progressive movements. Modern education is a mighty movement in modern life. Young men and young women were never so alive to the needs of education, technical training, vocational guidance and creative power as now. This new position means that the farm woman must take advantage of labor-saving devices in the home, that she may have the time and strength to fit herself for the new relations and the new responsibilities. She has been too busy at home to be much in the limelight, but she has been thinking, and through the school, the church, the home makers’ club, the University short course, she will make herself felt in raising better children, building better homes and a better commonwealth. When the Romans got into trouble and had to have a dictator they sought the old farmer Cincinnattus. The farm woman, wife and mother, rearing her family in the quiet homestead, has the chance to cultivate the sanity that will be the saving salt in many of our complicated situations. 094 Missouri Agricultural Report. CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT. (Mrs. C. W. Greene, Columbia, Mo.) In this department this year we selected only three lines of interest because our time was very limited. One session, in charge of Mrs. J. G. Jones, was givenesto art and music in the home. This was illustrated by lan- tern slides and by the player plano. Another meeting, with Mrs. W. W. Charters as leader, was devoted to papers and discussions of moral and ethical training in the home. These papers are all given in connection with this report. The third meeting was one on ““Games and Amusements for Chil- dren,’ and with it was held a baby health contest. The children from the elementary School of the State University and the Benton school of Co- lumbia gave an exhibition of games such as tenpins, bean bags, three deep, ringtoss and basket ball. Some of the Mother Goose rhymes were dramatized and a number of folk dances and marches were BiveU: Two hundred and fifty children were on the floor. The baby health contest was instituted that the babies of our State might receive more attention. It was conducted without prizes of any kind, and the babies were protected from publicity in every way. The score card used was furnished by the physiology department of the State University and is an attempt at measuring the child’s physical and mental develop- ment. The anthropometric measurements were made by persons of experience and skill. The medical examination was given Donald Meyer, Missourt Home Makers’ Conference. 595 by the dean of our State Medical School, who is a specialist in eye, ear, nose and throat diseases. The following score card was used: THE MISSOURI HOME MAKERS’ CONFERENCE. OFFICIAL SCORE CARD FOR THE BABIES’ HEALTH CONTEST. Nec td © See ee ee ee en teres Mo el ly ee oe ee ce erg deere tec Ne A Aileil o d atin ae ete ere RS LN Se So IN CMBV OATS Oe racer er chance otncenene oie eioaseenets IVE OTIS ee cee reer rece arconee rts IDF NgsPeeasn soon tucunepascodecret scans Boy, girl TD) AE SRO LAC TIGL YE ee eee eae Nee ee eas Te ae TO hs Heeb ee batt ode seein s Sua seed ob evevunvectai ayes sosucivacecas be EOC BISA TOSS a ee aa cede ee ee Sa I RL ata semana aifas cbc evetaceat po Atie ees bt eee ean Carat ee TRS HTAE) COVE TIPLE OS ncaa beecet Bad ie BSS ee Se SAE od a cS RE UO oe ake 8 Se ane ke INGER ULOTN DAG Veeco rrr Coe a eee ere o aera re slotes cauicec debices feb teses saaentinse ane obese DANCY) ot So Oe Bee ERC eRE ACEO SORE INIATITO Ofer 11 OUI CT re eee ars eae OTE oe TETSU oe eEa ane seat oek cathe deacuasetesetssteonsen Se AR mA TNR COSA UH 3 Sta eR ABA aia gah Pal aR nit Po AC CRE ro Rae RAD an aerate See oe Rate nae Parents early life spent in city or country ae Wiasimhisichildayvigorousiand Strong yat OI bl? oops seceteteas cece eee oe et tee e receasverdeescstesenactestis-auescadssseccoss~ GD reas tate essere cece rks Seen eae eet s Sa tae a Meee nee than eee Let eben TTR ini CMa Aceh trees ese terete ce Has the child had his food, exercise, baths, etc., by a regular or by an irregular schedule? WihabediscasesshasMhen lia dita erg tere hota. eck reece teeta hance carson seat ecaecnee re asec ck Oem noeiaaee Cammaccacemeeaets Official record, head and neck. Lee ed Individ-| Stand- ments. ual ard score. score. feet CInCuINferenGe: OfsHe ad yuo - ye een ety sie heh lens ak mG eet ene al | detecpeace ets Meslloes sectlsqocseaee 6 Qe) ONS tLe rc stiscieseceteses SVL Gl GER eet ec coererelion Are nee ane ied Gate avceeealedtas cme) Sea daacsseeat ce 4 Suet VesS—_siZOaSnape tSeuulnParmici) cei acacia & iio cimeiemee ie) el) eeceenace st seetleeh wansssetan sem 6 Ae iE AEL GIN OE TOONS 56 on ooo o-olo duo Dopo 6 blS do0.0 6 olb| beenecnredsteens| |s-penacerecasac 4 See eeINOSe——_SIZe aN Gp atenya. ora ciee eee. at2 ears Sivloxarels © cite ciltom-tssscasonce. cbnsecaedeetace 4 Guan Mouths tongue, palates GONSIIS: isomers iors sess aieieliat ne yernie) |e eecneecee sare baarcnteaens acer 6 RELL COG cea, eT We ra emat eh ore RA USB SIN Ne Sica. opera eshte cia ead can aebree suru cls cb wis stow atay 5 Somme NG CKva nla riya cd cece irars cost tel cueope Ate patos econ kes waitenste ge co) all inees Gee ean | ecesseeeerest oat 3 Trunk and limbs. COR MEANS 01 Res rerenetic bahuest as Hiete Re cn ese aatcnd ics CnC orate heme Rauch crn rome 6 TO Sew ECL SH Gee te ein sie ee, oa b Astin onedeslomeee Rats Den acauere et netoy a cachonertete 6 inl (OMS He as 6 OI oO Ore A Oe CR IIS CET Ok ator ancarar Renee tench to. ORIOL 6 LD peeWiaista(avenaviel):.-.smasivehscele cveuecese.s are) 2 ae Suet teenies set cer « 2 13. Symmetry of body 2 14. Forearm and hand 3 ie) CORI ETL InGM SG aid sc Rogidiol bids = 6.4 oflarnipinraiotorgs fo a8 Eieoemeane 3 16. Muscular poise in walking, sitting and power of handgrip..).... 6 MWe kin——qualitys coloring. CbeCr associates cielsietietcheac obiot.8 4 6 in)6 Side Ol Ecococgegeosnee4 pseenacuecconSca 2: 20. Expression and attention..... ite RAS PLA TEARS aoa fo 5ibch, Gera Ee ePe ence Al aortas ieecaoden 8 Oe NeLVOUSHbalancerandiGo-Ordinabl Olan. wee crease iatilneh oye po |-sceaor-4> sansa )ooseaeheeanaacs = 10 596 Missouri Agricultural Report. STANDARD MEASUREMENTS FOR BOYS. The facts are from Holt’s ‘‘The Care and Feeding of Infants.’’ ‘‘The weight of girls is on the average about one pound less than boys. They are about the same height.’’—Holt. Al Birth.—Weight, 74 pounds; height, 203 inches; chest, 13} inches; head, 14 inches; teeth none. At One Year.—Weight, 21 pounds; height, 29 inches; chest, 18 inches; head, 18 inches teeth, six. At Two Years.—Weight, 263 pounds; height, 32 inches; chest, 19 inches; head, 19 inches; teeth, sixteen. At Three Years.—Weight, 31 pounds; height, 85 inches; chest, 20 inches; head, 19% inches; teeth, twenty. F MEASUREMENTS OF BABY CONTEST WINNERS. Denver Champion.—Age, 34 months; weight, 34 pounds; height, 364 inches; head, 204 inches; chest, 224 inches; waist, 213 inches; forearm, 6% inches; calf, 8% inches. Denver Second.—Age, 24 months; weight, 30} pounds; height, 34% inches; head, 20 inches; chest, 204 inches; waist, 21 inches; forearm, 6} inches; calf, 83 inches. Chicago Champion.—Age, 40 months; weight, 34 pounds; height, 363 inches; head, 202 inches; chest, 223 inches; waist, 23} inches; forearm, 7} inches; calf, 9 inches. RULES FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE HEALTH AND LIFE OF THE BABY. 1. Follow a fixed and regular daily schedule for the babies’ feeding, exercise and play, rest and sleep, and body functions. 2. The clothing must protect the neck, arms and legs; it should be loose and com- fortable; the underclothing of light soft woolens. 3. Mother’s milk should be the food of the baby. When bottle-fed, use pure, sweet cow’s milk modified under the physician’s directions. 4. Games, romps and other baby exercise favor growth and give discipline in self- control. 5. Do not allow a typhoid fly to touch the baby’s sleeping lips, his food or his play- things. Flies carry germs of diarrhea, typhoid fever, tuberculosis and other death-dealing diseases. 6. ‘Baby pacifiers’ are instruments of death to the baby. 7. Never use ‘“‘soothing syrups,’’ which generally contain poisonous sedatives and habit-forming drugs. 8. A child trained to regular habits and in good health never cries except when hungry, tired or uncomfortable. The score cards when completely filled out were mailed to the parents of the babies. The front of the card contains the eugenical history of the child and a set of rules for preservation of the health of the baby. This whole movement has been characterized by the ab- sence of any comparison of children, of any commercialism, or any of the spectacular or sensational element. It has been an effort to enable parents to bring their children and have their bodily development scored, that they might learn wherein they lack perfection. No attempt was made to give medical advice, though an attempt was made to give intelligent answers to questions. Where a doctor’s care was indicated the attention of the parents was called to this fact. Sixty babies were entered, and they included all strata of society, from the common laborer’s baby whose roughened skin and broken toe nails showed contact with a strenuous world, up through the typical farmer’s baby, minister’s, banker’s and University professor’s babies. These children were all under Missouri Home Makers’ Conference. 597 forty months, but we found defects ranging from asymmetrical heads and broken noses to adenoids and cleft palates. In almost every case the parents were unconscious of these defects. We were impressed all the time with the lack of standards as to what constitutes a normal, healthy baby. Camilla Collins. Vivian Long. These babies averaged higher than Holt’s standards and. a little lower than the Colorado babies as reported in the news- papers. The babies were entered in three classes: In the first class, which included babies between the ages of 6 months and 18 months, Donald Meyer of Columbia was given first place. In 598 Missourt Agricultural Report. the second class, 18 months to 30 months, Vivian Long of Warrensburg was winner. And in the third class, 30 months to 42 months, Camilla Collins of St. Louis was declared most nearly perfect. Camilla Collins was also found to make the highest score of any child entered. It is hoped that the home makers in each county will make plans to have local baby health contests, with the thought always in mind that it.is the physical development and not beauty of the child that is under consideration. THE INFLUENCE OF GOOD MUSIC AND ART IN THE HOME. (Mrs. J. C. Jones, Columbia, Mo.) We women are beginning to take ourselves so seriously, and amid the din caused by the woman question it is so hard to determine whether we really are butterflies or the saviors of the Republic, and between deciding on the tango and the ballot we are in a frenzy of indecision. One epithet which was heard less frequently in former years is the mother of future generations, and appalling as this sounds, we cannot over- estimate the underlying meaning or minimize the responsibility which belongs to the phrase. Agnes Repplier has said if parents do not know by this time how to bring up their children it is not for lack of in- struction, and we are prone to agree with her when we con- template the amount of literature upon this subject, the variety of theories advanced in regard to it, and the attention paid to the child problems, both before and after birth. The little girl who said she wished she had been born in the time of Charles II because her history said that during his reign education was much neglected has our heartfelt sympathy. We are not concerned today with the complexity of. the general educational problems. Happily, we are not to decide whether our child material, which is the proper name now for any little boy and girl, has to sit on a hard bench many hours of the day and really learn his alphabet and how to spell with it and his multiplication table and how to multiply with it, or whether by suggestion and symbolic play he shall learn the necessary requirements of the three r’s, which, by the way, seem now to be of far less importance than we once believed. Let those of us who had little boys and girls and not child ma- terial wonder and be thankful that we brought them safely to Missouri Home Makers’ Conference. 599 maturity and so far have kept them out of the penitentiary. Seriously speaking, we should not minimize the importance of all of these questions, but the largest influence, after all, which comes into the life of the child is that which emanates from the home, the most unconscious but the most subtle and lasting, and to bring into the home the music and art which shall set a standard for all time should be the effort of the mother. There was a time before the invention of what some of our friends insist upon calling “canned music’? when it was difficult to familiarize the child or even the adult with the best kind of music. The girl who had taken valuable hours from study and recreation in God’s out-of-doors to practice, as soon as she had a home of her own found no time to keep up her music, and after six months or a year the piano was abandoned for house- hold tasks and the home was musicless. This need not be the condition now, for we have the piano player and victrola in every home where music is really desired. It is hard to estimate the possible educational advantage (notice I speak of it as a possibility for musical education), but I must em- phasize the fact that in homes without number this is only a possibility and not a reality. It is possible to go to a boun- tifully spread table and partake of the wholesome and palatable food, but quite as simple is it to eat only the pickles and sweets ‘with the attendant lack of benefit and satisfaction. Hence, when these instruments are introduced in the home and the mother lacks the standard and ambition for the best music, the damage is great. No art has a more insinuating influence, and the child who hears first from the mother a lullaby of musical worth and value is likely to have an ear trained in time for the best, and if this child is given songs suitable to its age and development, simple, worthy and beautiful, there will be in the inmost self of that child something developed which will be of the greatest value in later years. I have been often interested to hear people of intelligence and pronounced education say, “‘I can enjoy music which has a tune and I really am very musical, but I do not care to know about Wagner and Beethoven. I do not believe anybody really enjoys such music.’’ And I always find that such an one has not gone about the task of educating himself along this line as he has in literature and other branches of culture. Just as well never learn your alphabet and expect some fine day to enjoy yourself with a volume of Browning or Shakespeare as to neglect 600 Missouri Agricultural Report. all your musical education and then expect to get your five dol- lars worth out of a Wagner opera. To my mind the best music is none too good for the child, and my experience has been that taught wisely he will learn to love good music. Beginning very young one can give nursery rhymes set to music by J. W. Elliott, a writer of taste and distinction. These melodies are musical and catchy and melodious. JI used for years the kinder- garten book gotten up by Jessie Gaynor, our Missouri composer, of whom we are proud. Nor did I fear to familiarize children, both my own and the neighbors’ children, with such master- pieces as Schubert’s Erl Koenig, telling them the story and pre- paring some of them for a delightful experience when, in a foreign gallery, I led them to the masterpieces of Schnorr and Schwindt, portraying this mystic creature, and later in another German city they heard the inimitable Lilli Lehman render Schubert’s famous song. When it has been my pleasure to travel abroad with young people I have been interested to note that they enjoy and profit by what they see and hear just in proportion to their prepara- tion for it. The originals which they most desire to see are those with which they have been familiar through copies. The music they most enjoy is that they have some knowledge of. Many a symphony concert would have been a bore rather than a pleasure to my children had not my Cicilian piano already familiarized them with the masterpieces of Schumann and Schubert and other great composers. THE MORAL TRAINING OF CHILDREN. (Mrs. Jessie Allen Charters, Columbia.) The fundamental factor in all training is the imitative instinct. Children learn by doing, and they do what they see and hear others do. Later in life they may reconstruct their experiences by deliberating upon what they see and hear, and thus their acts are not all directly imitative. But small chil- dren are only copies, imperfect and modified, of the people around them. For this reason it is important that children be surrounded by people of the highest ideals and who are doing good things. A child cannot rightly be punished for something copied from its mother or father—when the parents are the highest model he knows. A mother who is not careful to tell exact truth to Missourt Home Makers’ Conference. 601 her children and before them is the one to be blamed when the children fail to tell the truth. There was once a woman (perhaps more than one) who did not want her Sundays disturbed by company at Sunday dinner. Every Saturday she told all her children that she would not let any one, not even those tiresome, meddling stick- tights, the Smiths, bewitch her into giving them an invitation to Sunday dinner. But after church on Sunday, being worked upon by habit and a sense of the duty expected of her, she did give the tiresome, meddling Smiths and others cordial invita- tions to dinner, and:during the long Sunday this dutiful and God-fearing mother pretended a pleasure in, hospitality and urged her friends to come again and often. No sooner would the door be securely closed upon their departing backs than the irritation from a disagreeable day would burst forth, and the children were even scolded and punished for their accu- mulated misdeeds. If there is ever to be an ideal of truthfulness in this world parents will have to set better examples at home than the average parents now offer. And the same is true of all the other virtues. Honesty must be taught by example first, foremost and all the time. The parent who will accept an incorrect bill when the mistake is in his favor sets a wrong standard of honor before his children. The mother who rejoices that the street car conductor missed her in collecting fares is training her children to wink at petty graft and to lower their ideals in all moral situations. The parents who slip their children into theatres, street cars, employments and other places of the sort with les, told or implied, about the children’s ages, are demoralizing these children’s standards of right and responsibility. Intemperance is a vice usually started in the home. Rarely does a child of total abstainers become a drunkard. Parents who drink a little, who have liquor in the house, who go into the saloons, and who allow the children a small amount of in- toxicants, are paving the way for these same children to become drunkards and worse. On the other hand, an example of high- minded sobriety at home will save a boy through life’s severest temptations. We have so far emphasized only one phase of moral training —but that is perhaps the most important phase of all. Chil- dren imitate their parents; they form their habits according to 602 Missourt Agricultural Report. the examples before them, whether for good or evil. Children try to be like the best people they know—their parents. How very important it is, then, that the parents be good and true and pure, virtuous in all their thoughts and acts, gentle with the children who are patterned after their image, and lenient with the faults derived from the parents by trustful imitation. Every parent may set a good example to the children, thus helping to form their characters beautifully and nobly. Good parents are not limited to the city or the farm, to the white race or the colored, to the past or the present. Every parent may set a good example to the children in the home. But parents have every day and every hour many practical problems of moral training, and I would feel that my opportunity were lost if I did not take up with you today some of our serious questions. There is, for instance, the question of obedience. It was not very long ago when obedience was a big word in family life, thus—obedience. In Japan children are compelled to obey their parents absolutely and without questioning. Many people have that tdeal for home life today—wishing it were possible to go back to those old-fashioned times when children were expected to give perfect obedience. Most parents spend a large amount of time in getting obedience from their children. There are two questions to ask ourselves: First, is perfect obedience desirable? And second, how shall we train our chil- dren to obey? First, is perfect obedience desirable? In some children perfect obedience would mean a giving up of personality to the despotism of some stronger will, and this submission could not possibly be yielded except under fear. Children who think for themselves and act for themselves are too busy to obey. If the parents are wise, restrictions will not be put around such children except when unavoidable, so that these children will at least not have many chances to disobey. I know of one such child—a four-year-old girl. If there are many things she must not do she cannot help being dis- obedient. When her mother sews on the machine she will put her hands on wheels and work, and climb over the machine. She can no more help it than a moth can help flying at a candle flame. The little girl I know climbs over chairs, jumps off steps, chews her fingers, and is in many ways a fidgety, dis- turbing element. But she is a sweet, loving, well-meaning Missourt Home Makers’ Conference. 603 child. Her nervous habits are no more under her control than is her heartbeat or her digestion. Accompanying this nervousness is a distaste for continuous work. It is nearly impossible to get her to put away her toys unless interest is kept up by some kind of game. If she spills a box of buttons it becomes the task of an afternoon to compel her to pick them up as a punishment for carelessness. Training such a child as this is a delicate and complicated matter, for in this case the connection between the physical nature and the mental and moral nature is easily seen, and there- fore the parent becomes more gentle in dealing with moral defects. What might seem to be a moral defect is often only a nervous disorder. The training being given to this child is largely physical. Nervousness can be partly controlled after the body has been well built up. But it is a matter of years’ work. Other children are naturally obedient—that is, they easily do what they are told to do. They do not keep particularly busy about their own play, nor too busy to pay attention to other things. One must not make a little tin god of obedience. While obedient children are convenient and may save serious diffi- culties, implicit obedience is a bad sign of sturdy character, and parents who demand utter, unreasoned obedience are killing their children’s character and later chance for independent action. There are several ways of training in obedience. One is the immediate, severe punishment of every form of disobedience. It is acommon belief that if every tendency toward disobedience is punished the child will of course be obedient. But obedience must be of the heart. Children who are thwarted will become deceitful if they have any grit and personality at all. They must have their own way some of the time; and the parent, in getting the appearance of obedience, is losing many things even more valuable than obedience. There is also the theory of reasoning with children. Obe- dience is secured by giving reasons for it. But parents soon learn to their sorrow that children are irrational little brutes. They love to argue and question and procrastinate, but they are not at all interested in the real reasons for and against their desires. They are interested in gaining some end by fair means or foul. And the parents who are careful to explain and to 604 Missouri Agricultural Report. reason find out how often they are baffled, and the child comes off victorious even when the parents are wholly in the right. There is one other method of training in obedience, namely, the method of giving very few commands, and practically none which are as unalterable as the laws of the Medes and Persians. Of course, it is impossible and undesirable for any child to be brought up without daily and hourly commands of ‘‘do this” and “‘don’t do that.’”’ But these commands and requests may usually be of passing interest only and may not be allowed to become “‘test situations.” I know a little boy whose father said to him, “‘Johnnie, put away your book now, it is bedtime.’ .The childish act is often inexplicable—and Johnnie threw his book to the floor in perfect good humor, saying “I won’t put away.my book.’ He was not a bad boy, he was on the whole of the docile type. So his father paid little attention, saying, however, “Yes, put it away now.” But John wouldn’t. Hesat. He grew stubborn. He was willing to go to bed or do anything else—but he wouldn’t pick up the book. He did not cry—he did not laugh. Being only four years old, and docile, the situation was unheard of. The other children went to bed. The mother reasoned, plead, loved him, promised rewards. The father joked, commanded, threatened finally; Johnnie did not and would not pick up the book. After two hours he was put to bed and the book left where it was. Less wise parents would have left the book on the floor and in the morning the battle would have been resumed. But these parents gave up. They realized that their docile son had a will of his own which they must respect. These sudden, intense, disciplinary situations appear to be more frequent when children are tired or ill. Rarely, in- deed, have my children had serious difficulties before five o’clock at night. But several serious battles were fought about bed- time before I realized that it must be only the children’s fatigue and my own which was responsible. Since then I’ve been able to let morals go after six o’clock, and we’ve all been better and happier for it. And so far I have never punished the children when they are sick, but have begun already to explain matters to them. I say, ‘““Mother knows you don’t feel very well, and the germs in you make you want to be cross and to stamp your foot and to say “T won't.”> So I’m not going to pay any attention to the germs, Missourt Home Makers’ Conference. 605 but help you to get well.” So all attention is directed to get- ting fresh air, sunshine and happiness, and the next thing that happens is a combination of good health and good temper. All that I have tried to do today is to give a few hints about moral training. It would take many hours to talk over even half our daily problems. I should like very much to know from you what you think and do and what your most serious problems are. And from you, friends in the State, who may read this paper but who are not at this conference, I wish that I might hear. I should like to know how other mothers train their children to be good and true and loving children. COURTESY IN THE HOME. (Mrs. W. F. Flournoy, Marionville, Mo.) Courtesy is, etymologically speaking, the politeness of courts. It displays itself in the address and manners. The courteous individual is one who is polite, civil, obliging and affable. A person possessed of those qualities is truly agree- able, while without them he may have great talent, good con- duct, virtue, and still be disagreeable. Some one has very truthfully said that ‘as charity covers a multitude of sins before God so does politeness before men.’ I do not see that the courtesy or politeness or good manners used in the home is any different from that used elsewhere, yet my subject, “Courtesy in the Home,’’ might make one think there is a difference. Politeness is a result or perhaps combination of good sense and good nature and becomes a habit. And the individual who is habitually polite away from home must necessarily have some in reserve for home use. In order that the habit of politeness may become a fixed habit it is very necessary that children be taught to be polite and well-man- nered from infancy. It is just as necessary a part of their education as are the “‘three R’s.’’ Sometimes I think teaching them the “‘three R’s’’ is the easier task. Some of you who have no children can, perhaps, tell us just the most approved methods for teaching children to be cour- teous. I certainly hesitate to do so. However, little children are great imitators, so perhaps example is one of the best ways. Precept, of course, is always the easy method, but maybe not so effectual. If a child is taught to have the proper respect for the rights, property and opinions of others, that child has ac- 606 Missouri Agricultural Report. quired the first step in the education of being courteous. Chil- dren, like grown-up people, acquire ease and gracefulness of manner by coming in contact with others. The friendly col- lision rubs off the corners and polishes the rough places, until the child forgets to be rude and smiles and looks pleasant when things go wrong. I think in the home which entertains a good deal the children acquire a desirable deference to others. In fact, the entertaining in the home might be a part of the cour- tesies of that home. One of the viewpoints that is not always put before children is that they can look at it from a selfish standpoint. Other people will have a much better opinion of the child who is polite, and the child himself will think so much better of himself. Usually courteous children are fairly good children. POULTRY SECTION. (Mrs. R. Lee Alford, Vandalia, chai.man.) The poultry section of the Home Makers’ Conference is a new venture, this being the first year, and great in- terest was manifested at the meeting. We were especially favored by having with us: T. E. Quisenberry, director of the Missouri Poultry Experiment Sta- tion, Mountain Grove, Mo.; Judge E. C. Branch, member of the revision com- mittee of the American Poultry Asso- ciation, and H.’ L. Kempster, professor of poultry husbandry, University of Mis- souri, each of whom gave able lectures advocating better methods and greater attention devoted to farm poultry. Interesting papers were also given by Mrs. James A Staples of Lamonte, Mrs. Scott Cunningham of Palmyra, Mrs. E. M. Scott of Lathrop and Miss Martha Blume of New Franklin, and others. The poultry section will undertake an egg laying contest in the homes of the farm women of the State under the direction of the chairman, Mrs. R. Lee Alford of Vandalia. Professor Kempster in his lecture comprehensively outlined the method by which such a contest might be conducted. Missouri now ranks as poultry queen of the Union, but. we must work hard to keep our reputation. Mrs. R. Lee Alford. Missourt Home Makers’ Conference. 607 HOW TO MAKE POULTRY PROFITABLE ON THE FARM. (T. E. Quisenberry, director of the Missouri State Poultry Experiment Station, Mountain Grove, Mo.) I am certainly delighted to have the opportunity to speak to the good women of Missouri who are interested in poultry on the farm, for it is to the farmer’s wife that Missouri is indebted for the greater portion of the $50,000,000 worth of poul- try and eggs that are marketed in this State each year. The care of the poultry on the farm is left largely to the farmer’s wife, his son and daughter, and the far- mer who doesn’t give reasonable atten- tion to his poultry is neglecting a very i, TS, OnRaeeioay. important source of revenue. A flock of 100 to 200 hens, if properly bred, housed and fed, will pay the dry goods, clothing, shoe and grocery bills for the average family on the farm. The products of the Missouri hen have outstripped the revenue derived from the Missouri mule. The poultry products of Missouri are twice those of our annual wheat crop and half as much as our annual corn crop. The Missouri hen _ pro- duces $10,000,000 more wealth annually in this State than do all the beef cattle of Missouri. Then, will it not pay you to devote a few minutes time each day in properly caring for your poultry? In a few words, the four essential things in successful poul- try raising can be summed up as follows: 1. Good stock—high vitality and pure bred. 2. Good houses—inexpensive but comfortable and con- venient. 3. Good feed—clean and wholesome and some variety. 4. Good care—clean ground and sanitary quarters, dili- gence, and common sense. 1. Without stock of strong, vigorous constitutions you will be troubled with more or less diseases in both young and old stock. A hen cannot lay many eggs without a good con- stitution. The destiny of your young chicks is largely de- termined before the eggs are laid. Don’t breed from stock 608 Missourt Agricultural Report. A chicken well bred and well hatched is half raised. too young or too old. Use pure-bred poultry because it looks better, you take more pride in it and give it better care, they lay more eggs as a rule, eggs are larger and more uniform, and it fattens better for market purposes. 2.