~ ath bonne et Ran ereek ne ahem aaah bop Aptech tres ba tect eR Ae PP RNa Pea PO ent = een Rarer eertr arwartognenenare Pre arenarare-at mw Sarana-ery aoe eran arene mee ee OO eS OETA OTT OE ETT CTO OT ; a a ae a EE RE AS IL, OT A OT OE OE OO NET = ~ aes = Abeer teeta em A et Cae ci tne tea Nalin as ete Se aj tae St ee re TOE OO ~ eb Ra Rhee nab Se eran etre wearer ~s ern ear TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TO THE Ee MIAN INST IT; SECRETARY OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTY ow Ty LS OO=d 9 Od. S47 ona: muses Je We POW-E LA DIRECTOR IN, Ee WvE@) IAG SAG a WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, BurEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY, Washington, D. C., July 1, 1899. Srr: I have the honor to submit, as Acting Director, the Twenty-second Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. The preliminary portion consists of an account of the operations of the Bureau during the fiscal year; the remainder comprises two memoirs, prepared by collab- orators, which illustrate the methods and results of the Bureau’s work. Allow me to express my appreciation of your constant aid and your support in the work under my charge. Iam, with respect, your obedient servant, W J McGes, Acting Director. Honorable 8. P. Laneiey, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. It CONTENTS PART 1 Reporr of THE DrrEcTOR ; Page ROC On eee eRe te net ee see Cae = eee ee nee eas Seni ee Ix eld reseanchwandrexploratilonte s sosccr ssc sa2 isos aceeeecas cee sees ee aoe x Oiheewresearchig ono 48 soe oe caso soeo sae ec es heise ce = ee cee ea eea el eecese Xv Wiorketmiesthetolopytesan: snes 2 sass anos ons see Sea c ae csaescceeeek see XV Wroxksinitechnoloryesaoee re soo fate a8 2 a Orme s steno eyes ahotecee eee ZI VOTES INE SOCLOlOP yamaha = ese Hoc Seer sie eee See OES ee ea sieee nee XXIV Wiorksinen nil Olop Yur eer jo nesses a Soest eas coat hee sa ean Selncke cecke 3.0 .0.¢ Wiorksinrsophiolopy esse see nest non ae nee as See eens ee nesc pace IIT Wiorkamidescripiive ethnoloryecass n= ser a se ayia ses ence nae kX SOVIET Pina Caine = ermne sete a -ee er anes oes oo Se an em ge cine ee St oe EVIL Colleciions@asae messmo one Meera aes a ace ene ee eben ets XXXVIII IBYODCHU yee eee ee eens ene ee ire cine © toe seo tse oa ee ela Reis oe XL Weerolopy—Brank Brederick: Hildentec tec cer aaa aems soo oe soee se eee xL ininaAnGial. statement yess. see -= (pl Al ESR Lp Pe a Ae oe ee ee ae See 1 . ae © a oO eal oc — al 2 z co ois oS ee os TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Duk hA UVOF AMERICAN ET EN O'L OG Y J. W. PowExu, Director INTRODUCTION Ethnologic researches have been conducted during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1901, in accordance with the act of Congress making provision ‘‘ for continuing researches relating to the American Indians under the direction of the Smithsonian Institution,’ approved June 6, 1900, and with the formal plan submitted June 9, 1900, and approved by the Secretary June 19, 1900. The field operations of the regular corps extended into Arizona, British Columbia, California, Lower California (Mexico), Maine, New Mexico, New York, North Caro- lina, Ontario, Sonora (Mexico), Virginia, and Wisconsin; while special work has been carried forward by agents or temporary collaborators in several additional states, ter- ritories, and provinces. The office work has comprised the preparation and study of material from most of the states and territories, as well as from various other parts of the American hemisphere. The researches have been carried forward in accord- ance with an ethnic system based chiefly on the work of the Bureau, though partly on the observations and deter- minations of other scientific investigators in this and other countries. The ethnic system developed and adopted in the Bureau is based primarily on the human activities—that is, on what men do and think—rather than on mere physical features. IX x BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY On this basis, the habits and customs of the aborigines receive first attention; and the tribesmen are classed by their languages and dialects, by their forms of social organization, by their systems of belief and opinion, and by their arts and industries; so that the classification affords a means of measuring the susceptibility of the various tribes to civilization, to education, and to arrange - ment on reservations in harmonious groups. The classi- fication is thus essentially practical. The practical tribal classification rests on a definition of the activities discovered among the aborigines and other peoples largely during the past quarter-century. The primary activities thus discovered are esthetic; and intimately connected with these are the industrial activi- ties involved in maintenance and welfare. Equally im- portant are the social activities shaping the collective existence of families, clans, tribes, and confederacies; and the relations are regulated by linguistic activities, which are highly important and indeed fundamental. Coordinate with these activities of arts and industries, laws and languages, are the activities connected with opinion, belief, philosophy—the sophie activities. On weighing all the factors it has been found that the most convenient classification of tribes is that based primarily on language, as explained in previous reports; and this mode of defining the Indian tribes, first proposed by Gal- latin and adopted by the Bureau on its institution, has now come into general use. FIELD RESEARCH AND EXPLORATION Throughout the first quarter of the year the Director was in Maine, reviewing observations on shell mounds and village sites in connection with the researches in classification noted in other paragraphs; and the work was resumed early in June. But limited collections were made, though the observations and notes on the numer- ous survivors of the Abnaki Indians proved of much interest and value. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XI An extended exploratory trip was made during the autumn of 1900 by Mr McGee. Early in October he proceeded to the field for the purpose of completing researches relating to the aborigines of the Serian stock and at the same time carrying forward studies of neigh- boring tribes. A party was organized at Phoenix, Ari- zona, and moved southwestward to Gila bend and thence southward to the international frontier at Santo Domingo. Here the outfit was admitted to Mexican territory through the courtesy of Senor Don Fernando Leal, at the obliging instance of Senor Don Manuel de Aspiroz, the ambassa- dor from Mexico to the United States. In this vicinity are several settlements of Papago Indians, including some of the Arenenos of early literature and local tradition, and the opportunities for study were seized. From Santo Domingo the party proceeded southward to Caborca and thence westward to the coast of Gulf of California, where the Tepoka Indians (collinguals of the Seri) were reported to live so late as 1894, subsisting on sea food and finding potable water in the lagoons and sand beds at the em- bouchure of the sand wash variously called Magdalena, Santa Ana, Altar, Asuncion, and San Ignacio. On reach- ing the coast the leader was disappointed to find the tribal remnant entirely gone—probably through extine- tion, possibly through migration down the coast to Seri- land. Traces of the Tepoka habitations still remained, together with shell accumulations and minor relies, cor- roborating the reports concerning the tribe current at Caborea in 1894; and the visit served also to clear up doubtful points connected with the geography and history of the region. Failing thus to attain the primary object of the expedi- tion, Mr McGee determined to visit the territory of the little-known Cocopa Indians, reputed to live about the ‘head of the gulf, and to this end endeavored to follow the coast northward to the mouth of the Colorado. Find- ing this entirely impracticable, he returned by a new route to Santo Domingo, collecting useful data concerning the Papago Indians on the way; and from Santo Domingo XII BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY he proceeded west-northwestward over the old Yuma trail (including a stretch of 90 miles now without water) to Yuma, and thence southward to the Cocopa country. Here valuable collections, notes, and photographs were obtained; and after some weeks the party returned via Yuma and the Gila and Salado valleys to Phoenix, dis- banding there on December 20. The party comprised Mr W J McGee, Ethnologist in Charge, as leader; Mr DeLancey Gill, artist; Professor R. H. Forbes, of the territorial university of Arizona (during part of the trip); Senor Aurelio Mata, a Mexican customs officer sent from the custom-house at Nogales to facilitate the crossing at the international boundary; John J. Carroll, of Tempe, teamster; Jim Moberly, of Tempe, packer; Hugh Norris, of Tueson, Papago interpreter, and Ramon Zapeda, of Tucson, Mexican interpreter. The Bureau was placed under great obligations for free entry of the outfit to the government of the neighboring republic through the officers already named, as well as through Senor Don Eduardo J. Andrade, of Yuma, custodian of the Andrade grant, covering the territory occupied by the Cocopa Indians. On August 11 Mr James Mooney proceeded to the old Cherokee country in western North Carolina and adjacent territory for the purpose of collecting additional data required for the completion of his series of papers on the Cherokee Indians, and his field operations continued with success until early December. On April 25 he made a reconnoissance trip through eastern North Carolina and Virginia for the purpose of locating remnants of aborigi- nal tribes still surviving in the wooded and nearly inac- cessible districts of that region; he revisited the Pamun- key tribe and discovered considerable remnants of the Chickahominy, Mattaponi, and Nansemond tribes. On his appointment as Assistant Ethnologist (Septem - ber 1), Mr John R. Swanton proceeded to British Colum - bia to undertake researches among several northwestern tribes. His work proceeded successfully up to the end of the fiscal year, when he was still in the field. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XIII On October 1 Mr J. N. B. Hewitt repaired to the region occupied by the survivors of the Iroquoian tribes in north- western New York and neighboring portions of Canada, where he began the collection and verification of traditions and cosmogonie legends, and his work continued until about the middle of February, when he returned to the office with valuable collections and records. On April 15 Dr Frank Russell was appointed as Ethnologist, and was assigned to duty in Arizona; he immediately proceeded to the field and began an extended reconnaissance of the southern and central portions of the Territory. Outfitting with a team at Tucson, he passed around the northern end of Santa Catalina moun- tains and up San Pedro river (visiting the caves and pictographs of the Santa Catalina range and the cliff houses of the Galiuro range on the way) to Nugent pass, where he entered Aravaipa valley. Here he found an interesting group of cliff houses. Thence he proceeded by way of Eagle pass to Gila valley, where interesting archeologic observations were made. Pushing on south- ward he traversed the eastern slopes of Chiricahua moun - tains and the western slopes of Swisshelm mountains, ‘and examined the easterly canyons of Huachuca moun- tains. Next he traversed portions of the Babacomori, Sonoyta, and San Rafael valleys about the Mexican boundary; thenee he returned by new routes to Santa Catalina mountains and Tueson, arriving about the end of May. In the course of the trip he discovered various ruins hitherto unknown, some of new types. Several of the ruins were surveyed, and limited collections were made. On June 11 he proceeded northward from Tucson, crossing the Gila near Florence, skirting the base of Superstition mountains, and traversing Tonto valley; a number of cliff houses and other ruins were discovered during the journey, which was not completed at the end of the fiscal year. In June an arrangement was effected with Mr O. P. Phillips and the Armat Motion-Picture Company, under which Mr Phillips proceeded to New Mexico and Arizona 29 wa —_04———“11 XIV BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY for the purpose of making motion pictures representing the industries, amusements, and ceremonies of the Pueblo and other tribes, it being anticipated that such pictures would prove of especial service for purposes of immediate research as well as for permanent record. The preliminary reports indicate that the work has been successfully initiated. Throughout the fiscal year Dr Willis E. Everett remained in Alaska, pursuing his vocation of mining engineer, but availing himself of opportunities for observing the native tribes and recording their languages and other activital characteristics. Several reports indicating prog- ress in the collection of such material were received in the course of the year. Dr Robert Stein, who spent the winter of 1899-1900 in Elsmereland, primarily for purposes of geographic explo- ration, but incidentally to make search for traces of abo- riginal occupancy in the interests of the Bureau, reported via Dundee, through the courtesy of masters of whaling vessels, late in the summer of 1900. He found no traces of Eskimo or other settlements in the territory traversed by him, comprising the eastern coast of Elsmereland, and his negative evidence is of service in investigations relat- ing to the distribution and migrations of the Eskimo. At the time of the last report he was preparing to cross Baffin bay to Upernivik, on the western coast of Green- land, with the expectation of extending his previous observations on prehistoric Eskimo settlements along the unexplored coast. During the autumn Miss Alice C. Fletcher found it nec - essary to revisit Oklahoma for the purpose of completing the ritual of the Pawnee ceremony known‘as the Hako, of which the greater portion was collected during the last fiscal year. In connection with the collection of this material she was fortunate in obtaining also much addi- tional information touching the ceremonial and ritualistic life of this highly interesting and httle-studied tribe. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XV OFFICE RESEARCH Work IN ESTHETOLOGY In addition to administrative duties in the office as Ethnologist in Charge and part of the time as Acting Director, and the field work noted, Mr McGee engaged in researches relating to the primitive symbolism found among the American aborigines and other lowly peoples. Certain symbols are of nearly world-wide distribution, and extend into several stages of culture—for example, the swastika, or filfot, appears on all of the continents except Australia, and its culture range extends at least from higher savagery into the lower strata of civilization. Before the extremely wide range of such symbols was ascertained various inquirers were led to regard their use as an evidence of cultural identity, and hence of the orig- inal unity of the peoples among whom they were found; but since they have been observed among highly diverse peoples in different stages of culture and on remote con- tinents this interpretation has been modified or aban- doned in large measure, and students have set themselves to the task of tracing the development of the symbols in particular cases. The recent researches have shown that symbols of quatern character, like the swastika, express or reflect modes of thought especially characteristic of lower (but not lowest) culture, yet extend well into civ- ilization and enlightenment. At the same time the researches bring to light such diversities in the nature and applications of the concepts expressed by the symbols as to indicate, if not demonstrate, independent develop- ment. Thus, quatern symbols abound among the Papago Indians of Arizona and Sonora, as well as among several neighboring tribes, yet the Papago concept is distinct, as is shown by its extension to time as well as space, this extension carrying such archaic features of ritual and ceremony as to indicate increasing independence of the concept in the generations traced backward. XVI BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY The neighboring Zuni Indians have a more highly differentiated concept in that their ‘‘ Cult of the Quar- ters’’ involves six directions (zenith and nadir in addi- tion to the cardinal points), yet the symbol retains the original quatern form, with two added elements so placed as to destroy the symmetry of the figure. These in- stances of diversity in symbol, and still greater diversity in meaning of the symbol (or in the primary concept), might be multiplied almost indefinitely; they merely give some indication of the development of simple quatern symbols and of the complex and protean magma of thought out of which they have been developed by simple processes and easy steps. Incidentally the examples marshaled corroborate and extend the law of activital coincidences formulated in an early report of the Bureau; but the applications of the recent study are numerous and useful, especially in their bearing on symbolism in gen- eral and on the development of systems of counting. The results of the study are incorporated in the Nineteenth Report in the form of a brief paper entitled ‘‘ Primitive Numbers,”’ During the earlier portion of the year Dr Fewkes ar- ranged for publication a series of graphic representations of the personages composing the Hopi pantheon, together with full descriptions of the pictures and a discussion of characteristic paraphernalia of the personages repre- sented. The representations are in outline and color and well illustrate the early stage in the development of graphic art reached by the more advanced among the aboriginal tribes; hénce they throw strong light on the codices and other pictorial essays of the more southerly tribes, especially those of Mexico, Central America, and Peru. The pictures were executed by a native artist, who was also a priest in the hieratic or sacred organiza- tion through which the tribal mythology is maintained, and each picture is a faithful reproduction of ancient representations handed down through many generations. The material has been published in the Twenty-first An- nual Report, the original drawings being used as copy and ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XVII reproduced in slightly reduced facsimile. The work is deemed an important contribution to knowledge of the aborigines in several respects. It illustrates the motives and conventions of aboriginal art in both form and color; it reveals the rdle of symbolism in primitive art with re- markable clearness; it illustrates with satisfactory com- pleteness the nature and structure of a typical barbaric pantheon; and since the symbols and conventions (and, indeed, the personages represented) are of great constancy in primitive thought, it affords a series of types available for use in identification and comparison of a wide range of symbolic representations among the Pueblo and other tribes, not only in ceremonies and sacred paraphernalia, but in the decoration of fictile ware, basketry, woven fabrics, ete. Later in the year Dr Fewkes was occupied with a sys- tematic study of the collections made by him in Arizona and New Mexico during 1896 and 1897, the study being carried forward with special reference to the symbolic decoration of the fictile ware. All systematic investi- gators of the decorative devices used by primitive peoples have been impressed by their constancy, that is, by the exceeding slowness of modification. They have also been impressed with the dependence of the modification on external forces and conditions rather than on the spontaneous internal factor so prominent in the art of advanced culture. Recognizing these characteristics of primitive art, Dr Fewkes undertook to define the symbolic (or esthetic) types prevailing among the peoples of Walpi, much as a naturalist might define types of animal and vegetal life for the establishment of species and genera and orders, and for tracing the lines of vital development in a distinctive environment. His symbolic types were based on specimens observed among the tribesmen or obtained from sites occupied by their ancestors during the historical period; and he soon found that the types served to indicate what may be termed a symbolic province, that is, a region throughout which the symbolic devices were XVIII BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY similar, but in which they differed essentially from those of other regions. In this way he defined an ethnie dis- trict and established standards for the guidance of future investigation and also for the localization of ill-labeled specimens in museums; for many collectors have been content to label specimens of symbolic pottery and other objects ‘‘Arizona,’’ ‘‘ Pueblo region,’’ or by other large and indefinite political or natural divisions, thereby confusing important symbolic distinctions and ethnic districts. As his investigations of the symbolic types progressed, Dr Fewkes became more deeply impressed than any pre- decessor with the persistence of motives and the regular- ity of their evolutional lines; and he conceived, in a definite and constructive way, the possibility of tracing prehistoric migrations by means of the decorative symbols, that is, of employing symbolic devices as prehistoric rec - ords, reading from them the tale of tribal movements before the coming of Coronado—he conceived the possi- bility of coordinating the archeologiec record as taught by symbols with tribal traditions, and the double advantage of mutual verification between tradition and symbolic record. Proceeding in accordance with these ideas, he obtained from living Hopi men traditions of a former residence of their ancestors at a locality which they called Homolobi, and by excavations he identified this site and verified the traditions, thereby extending his knowledge of the evolution of the symbolic types; for the Homolobi collections (now inthe National Museum) not only abound in decorated ware, but are notably rich in symbols suscep- tible of interpretation. Subsequent exploration brought him to the site of a ruin on Chevlon creek, where excava- tion revealed another stage in the same general line of symbolic development, which corroborated the vague and shadowy tradition that Hopi clans once inhabited this site. He later sought a locality noted in still vaguer migration legends, and was gratified by finding near Chaves pass the archeologic record of this stage in migration inscribed ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XIX in symbols related to the higher type from the more northerly localities. Beyond this point ruins which mark traditional halting places in migration were not located; beyond it the sym- bolic development has not yet been traced; but there is good ground for anticipating that when Dr Fewkes returns to the field he will obtain still earlier records of the pre- historic movements and development of this branch of the Pueblo peoples. The work is deemed of much impor- tance as a verification of aboriginal tradition, as a means of verifying other migration legends, and as a promising introduction to the practical interpretation of history unwittingly recorded in graphic symbols. Incidentally, the work corroborates the earlier conclusion reached in the Bureau, that the Pueblo peoples are a resultant prod- uct of Southern culture and Northern blood; yet the sig- nificant details throw new light on the entire problem. The report is elaborately illustrated by colored photo- graphs of the ware from the several localities examined;. it occupies a portion of the present volume. Work IN TECHNOLOGY The earlier accounts of exploration in the territory occupied by the Cocopa Indians seemed to indicate that the tribesmen occupied the coast of Gulf of California and were of maritime habits; but in the course of the expedition led by the Ethnologist in Charge it was defi- nitely ascertained that the folk are essentially agricultural and confined, at least so far as habitations are concerned, to the interior. The industrial condition of the tribe was found to be of much interest. The tribal habitat com- prises the Lower Colorado valley from the International Boundary southward to the head of the gulf, together with a few tributary valleys descending from the Cocopa mountains on the west. The main valley is broad and diversified by distributaries, or bayous, of which the most important is Hardy river, or ‘*‘ Hardy’s Colorado.’’ There are also several fairly permanent basins, filled by the XxX BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY annual floods and slowly evaporated during succeeding months, and the greater part of the broad bottom is swept by the freshets. Within the region lie a number of ‘‘mud voleanoes,’’ apparently analogous to the ‘‘mud lumps” of the Lower Mississippi, which have attracted much attention by reason of their novelty, though they are quite subordinate to the general features. The entire district affords the closest American parallel to the valley of the Nile, not only in physical conditions, but in the influence of these on human conditions. Like northern Africa, the general region is one of extreme aridity, the rainfall (averaging less than 2 inches yearly during the last quarter-century at the typical sta- tion of Mammoth Tanks) being negligible; while the habitable district is well watered by annual freshets of remarkable regularity in period and height. These fresh- ets not only flood but fertilize the riparian lowlands; they control directly the local flora and somewhat less directly the local fauna, and they regulate the movements, most of the industrial habits, many of the social customs, and much of the mythology of the human population. Dur- ing the greater part of the year water is obtainable only from the shrunken river, on whose banks grow most of the seed-bearing and root-yielding plants available as food, so that the people are led to occupy the lower bot- tom lands. Here the cultivated crop plants are sown in soil soaked by the flood and enriched by its silt deposit, to grow and ripen rapidly under the subtropical sun; here habitations are erected, naturally of hght and tem- porary character, and here the small and scattered vil- lages characteristic of the tribe grow up during each late summer and early autumn. The chief crop plants are corn (maize), beans, peas, squashes, and melons, and it is noteworthy that most of these represent the aboriginal plant stocks brought under cultivation in pre-Columbian times. Fishing and hunting the abundant waterfowl, as well as other game, contribute to the tribal subsistence, and dur- ing recent years part of the crop of corn, beans, and peas ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XXI is carried on horseback to Yuma and bartered chiefly for appareling. Early winter is the time for ceremony with the attendant feasting, and by early spring, when the greater and less portable part of the annual crop is con- sumed, the families prepare for the annual migration to the higher lands, where they await the rise and subsi- dence of the vernal flood. On its passing they return to the low grounds, to rebuild and plant on the last year’s farms or elsewhere according to the changes wrought by the freshet or the chance of death and mortuary observance. Naturally an agriculture depending so largely on chance conditions is improvident, comparatively unproductive, and incapable of sustaining any considerable or concen- trated population, so that its tendency combines with that of annual migrations to stifle the home sense and to scatter the members of consanguineal groups, and thus to affect the social organization. The recurrent floods also affect the ceremonies and attendant faiths of the tribes- men in various ways; for example, they control mortuary observances and have undoubtedly led indirectly to the eustom of burning the bodies of decedents in and with their houses, distributing their property to nonrelatives, and incidentally destroying adjacent houses and other property. This.dispersive social factor combines with that growing directly out of the agricultural methods, and not only prevents the development of village life with the concomitant institutions, but perpetually impoverishes the tribe. Thus the Cocopa Indians present an industrial paradox, for while they occupy one of the garden spots of the Western Hemisphere, whose natural freshets might be so utilized as to sustain an enormous population, they subordinate themselves to the environmental conditions and remain one of the poorest and most hopeless of the American tribes. During the earlier part of the year Dr Albert E. Jenks (then a correspondent of the Bureau) revised his memoir on ‘‘The Wild Rice Gatherers of the Upper Lakes’’ (pub- lished as part of the Nineteenth Annual Report), incor- porating some of the results of recent researches. On XXIT BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY June 1 he was appointed to the position of Assistant Ethnologist in the Bureau, and was assigned to work related to his previous researches. He at once took up the subject of birch bark, with the aboriginal industries depending on this natural commodity of a considerable fraction of the North American continent. One of the most important products of the birch-bark industry is the canoe; and this, like other industrial products of con- sequence, exerted a powerful influence on the lives of the producers. Through one of those harmonies of nature on which the progress of mankind so largely depends, much of the birch-bearing region of North America (a zone stretching from Maine to Washington State and Alaska, and extending from below the Great Lakes nearly to the treeless Arctic) is also the region of late Pleisto- cene glaciation, and hence of glacial lakes, swamps, and labyrinthine streams; so that throughout the period of aboriginal development an ideal canoe material coexisted with illimitable functions for the canoe in the way of travel and transportation. Under the natural combination, aided by native intelli- gence and skill, the lakes and streams became routes of passage, and by reason of the lightness and strength of the material, and the lowness and narrowness of the ice- molded divides, portages were easy, so that the routes passed from lake to lake, river to river, and drainage sys- tem to drainage system, practically across the continent. Under the stimulus of facility, the birch-canoe makers became travelers and explorers; energetic hunters and fishermen explored new waters and carried tribal knowl- edge into new regions; ambitious scions struck out into the remoter wilderness to make conquest over the unknown and often to establish families and clans, and eventually tribes, in new localities; so that in course of time the pad- dlers of the hght canoe carried their kindred, their dia- lects, their faiths, over the greater part of the vast region defined by the birch tree and the glacial waterways. Most of the canoemen belong to the Algonquian stock, most of the remainder to the Athapascan stock; and the recent ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XXII researches render it clear that their water craft was a leading factor in determining their wide distribution and their success in making conquest of the continent up to the plane of aboriginal standards. The detailed results of the work are in preparation for an early report. In tracing the joint lines of migration and esthetic development noted in other paragraphs Dr Fewkes be- came impressed with the fact that among the ancestors of the Hopi Indians the esthetic standards were much more permanent than the industrial standards. Through- out the entire course of tribal migrations retraced by his researches—a course covering several distinct treks, alter- nating with periods of stable settlement, the whole cov- ering some centuries—the symbolic devices inscribed on the fictile ware remained constant or underwent only slight and easily traceable modifications, while at each successive settlement new materials were utilized in the pottery making, the manufacturing processes and the final forms of the ware being manifestly adjusted to the character of the material. The discovery that the indus- trial activities (which directly measure the conjustment of man and environment) are the most progressive of the entire series is not, of course, novel; still less is it novel to learn that the especially conservative esthetic concepts, which are at once hereditary and prophetic, as shown by Groos, outlive whole generations of contemporaneous industrial concepts; yet the example is notably apposite and instructive, largely by reason of the freedom of the folk from external interference, with the consequent sim - plicity and integrity of the record. The details are incor- porated in Dr Fewkes’s paper in another part of this report. In the course of his reconnoissance of central and southern Arizona Dr Frank Russell gave especial atten - tion to the architectural features of the ruins, and defined a number of types, of which one or two are new to south- western archeology.. The work was still in progress at the close of the fiscal year. XXIV BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY WorK IN SoctoLocy A portion of the year was employed by the Director and the Ethnologist in Charge in reviewing the abundant data in the Bureau archives relating to aboriginal insti- tutions, and in systemizing the principles of sociology in the light of these data. One of the lines of inquiry, ren- dered important not only by inherent interest but by aurrent problems growing out of the recent expansion of the territory of the United States, relates to slavery among the primitive peoples, and the researches render it clear that the relationships so designated vary widely with intellectual plane or culture grade—indeed, the social subordination of lower culture is so unlike the slavery of civilization that the application of the same designation to both institutions is quite misleading. In the slavery of civilization the slaves are not only aliens but chattels, personal ownership of whom is definitely established and maintained through laws relating to tenure, bequest, conveyance, etc., but in savage society, in which personal proprietary rights are inchoate or non- existent, in which the tenure inheres practically or abso- lutely in the group, in which bequest is hardly, if at all, recognized, and in which thrift sense is lacking and prop- erty sense involved with mythic factors, such slavery is simply impossible. True, there are many recorded in- stances of slavery among lower tribes, but most of these rest on casual or superficial observation, or on other testi- mony stopping short of inquiry into the precise nature of the relations between the supposed slaveholders and the supposed slaves, while the convenience of the common term for the expression of social inequality has contrib- uted to mislead recorders and (still more seriously) readers. To understand the so-called slavery of savagery it is necessary to grasp the mode of social organization char- acteristic of that culture grade. As shown chiefly through the researches among the American aborigines, such organization is based primarily on consanguinity (actual ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XXV or imputed), and secondarily on age; and the relations growing out of these factors are kept constantly in the mind of every member of each clan and tribe by habitual forms of address. So the constituent individuals of a given clan are fathers and mothers, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, and these relationships are constantly indicated in salutations, and even in ordinary conversa- tion (the precise relationship to the speaker being com- monly expressed also by a pronominal element). At the same time it is constantly borne in mind that father and son, mother and daughter, are not coordinate, the for- mer being the superior by reason of greater age; similarly brethren are classed as elder brothers and younger broth- ers, While the female kindred of the same generation are classed as elder sisters and younger sisters, and the elder ane always deemed superior, the younger inferior, in rank. By simple and practical extension of the system, the rela- tive ages of all persons in the clan are kept in mind; and since, according to the universal usage of savagery (so far as known), superior age confers authority, there is a prac- tically simple, though theoretically complex, regimenta- tion running through the entire clan, whereby the eldest person commands all and obeys none, while the youngest person obeys all and commands none, and each other per- son is entitled to command and bound to obey in the direct proportion of relative age. This regimentation is com- plicated by various factors, such as adoption, and (espe- cially) what may be called promotion and demotion, that is, advancement in ‘‘age’’ (rank) by common consent in recognition of prowess, ete., with correlative reduction in ‘‘age’’ as the penalty for cowardice, etc., so that the actual age relations may be completely lost; yet the imputed relationship serves practical purposes, and the organiza- tion is maintained with unimpaired efficiency by means of relationship terms. The same system is extended from the clan to the tribe, in which the several clans are ranked in the order of ‘‘age’’ (of course imputed), and eventually to the tribes united in confederacies; so at last XXVI BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY the system reaches every member of the tribal confed-— eracy and each is entitled to command or bound to obey any other according to the relationship expressed in the form of salutation and constantly kept alive in conversa- tion. True, uncertainties and differences of opinion may arise, especially between the remoter individuals and groups; commonly these are settled by more or less pro- longed deliberation and discussion, or ‘‘ council,’’? though some of the bloodiest wars of Indian history grew out of such misunderstandings; yet even the appeal to force and arms but serves as a means of settlement of the dis- pute, for the conquerors thereby become the elder and the. conquered the younger in primitive thought. So, too, when stranger tribes meet, both are constrained by universal tribal law, and proceed to council or war, as the case may be, for the purpose of fixing the relative ‘‘ age,”’ with the consequent right of command, and in some cases the question may remain open for centuries (as between the Apache and the Papago) and lead ‘to interminable warfare. Now, the conquered tribe may merely retire from the field of dispute, leaving what both conceive to be the verdict of superhuman potencies beyond reach of continuous execution; but if the contestants are actually related, or if the conquest is complete, they commonly remain in association, the survivors of the conquered families being absorbed or more formally adopted into the conquering tribe, and perhaps distributed among the families of that tribe, whereupon all the captives become subordinate to each and all of the conquerors, to whom thenceforth they owe obedience. Commonly it is this condition of obedience on the part of a certain class or group to the commands of another class or group which impresses observers and leads to the records of slavery among primitive folk, though the institution involves no ownership of human chattels, no rights or duties save those connected with a system of rank correlated with relative age, actual or imputed. The institution might better be styled wholesale adoption, or collective adop- tion, than slavery. Among the American aborigines the ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XXVII captives, or adoptees, are usually assigned an ‘‘age’’ cor- responding with the time of their entry into the tribe, so that they are compelled thereafter to obey all children then living, and are entitled to command all children sub- sequently born into the tribe, and there is thus a fixed way whereby they attain in time the rank of the con- querors. Moreover, the method of promotion permits any ‘‘slave’’ (that is, captive-junior) to attain ‘‘age’’ by the display of prowess, industry, skill, generosity, or other attributes appealing to the sentiments of primitive men. Among certain other peoples, the custom of collee- tive adoption appears to be so modified that the captives remain juniors not only to members of the captor tribe born anterior to the captivity, but to all others, and it is this modified institution which matures in actual slavery with the development of property-sense; but even in this ease there are (at least in the early stages) devices for the manumission or liberation of, or the acquisition of rank by, captives (or captive-descendants) of exceptional abil- ities. The several primitive customs grade into the insti- tution of slavery proper in ways which are of much interest, but which need not now be followed; it suffices to emphasize the important distinction between the captive subordination of primitive peoples and the real slavery of some civilized nations. In the course of his researches among the Cocopa In- dians Mr McGee discovered several industrial factors of dispersive tendency, that is, factors tending to weaken home ties and family bonds and to scatter the families and clans; and naturally these factors are reflected in the social organization. The tribe is now distributed over an area of several thousand square miles, extending from the International Boundary on the north to the head of salt water (of Gulf of California) on the south, and from the eastern border of the Colorado bottom to the base of Cocopa mountains; and within this area are seven subtribes, of which some, and perhaps all, are really clans, each organized under a subchief and all definitely united under a head chief, the present incumbent of this XXVIIT BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY office being a man of parts, an orator of ability, and a leader of much shrewdness, commonly known as Pablo Colorado. Now, naturally (and necessarily for the main- tenance of tribal integrity) the dispersive factors are counteracted and balanced by connective factors; and while it is probable that some of these remain undiscov- ered, a few of no small significance were detected by Mr McGee. As has been mentioned, the mortuary observ- ances include sacrifice of all the immediate belongings of decedents, for immediately after the death of a tribes- man his personal possessions—horse, saddle, weapons, implements, apparel, grain and other food stuffs, bed- ding, dogs, ete.—become public and are distributed among nonrelatives in the order of arrival, while any unclaimed residue is burned with the body and house. Several social consequences attend this industrially improvident procedure. In the first place, the largess is an incentive to maintaining connection between the scat- tered families and clans and to lively (albeit morbid) interest in the state of health of invalids, thrifty pro-. ducers, and other members of the tribe; again, the actual mortuary distribution brings together scattered tribesmen and their families and unites their interests in ceremonies of affecting if not imposing character; and finally the material sacrifice commonly leaves dependents (widows, children, and perhaps agelings) to be supported by the informal public bounty of tribal life, or perhaps to be distributed among scattered families in such manner as to strengthen sentiments of communality and to keep alive the sense of community in interests. This factor is prominent in the customs of the tribe, and its influence is direct and easily traceable. A less direct factor of similar tendency is found in the marital customs, or rather in the observances preceding and preparing the way for marriage. The girls’ puberty feast is, indeed, one of the most imposing and widely heralded of the tribal ceremonies; commonly it brings together representatives of all the subtribes or clans; and the proceedings are conducted with extreme formality ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XXIX and dramatic impressiveness. The principal ceremony lasts through a night, following a day of preparation and followed by another day of final feasting, accompanied by games, etc. The central episode is the temporary burial of the novitiate; a shallow pit is excavated, and in this a fire is made, as for a fish bake; after the earth is thoroughly warmed the remaining fuel and coals are re- moved, the girl is placed in the pit and buried to the neck with the earth thrown out in making the excavation; there she spends the night, and in the morning is extri- eated and brought before the assembled tribesmen as a woman; and commonly a match is made with a repre- sentative of some more or less remote branch of the tribe. Through the ceremony community of thought is maintained in most effective fashion, and through the resulting marriage the two families are united to the extent that a common consequence is the breaking of a new path, often many miles in length, through the luxurious herbage of the annually flooded bottom land. The formal organization of the Cocopa tribe is in large measure esoteric, so that it can be ascertained fully only after prolonged and intimate acquaintance with the tribesmen, but the preliminary investigation serves to show that the field of inquiry is one of promise. In his comparative study of myths Mr J. N. B. Hewitt found various references to social customs of such sort as to indicate clearly certain archaic institutions of the Iro- quoian Indians. Thus the Onondaga legends illumine the legislative and executive customs of the tribe, and, while ostensibly giving traditional warrant for the cus- toms, they really picture a somewhat earlier stage in the development of institutions than that found by the Cau- casian pioneers. In this tribe all matters of public policy, especially the selection of chiefs and the discontinuance of war, were first considered by the elderwomen in fairly definite clan councils. Their conclusions were formally communicated to a male spokesman, usually the elder brother (actual or putative) of the elderwoman, and by 22 ETH—04——111 XXX BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY this spokesman, with others of similar character from the other clans, the opinions of the mothers were brought before the exclusively masculine tribal council for debate and final decision. In this way the women sitting in clan council constituted the primary legislative body, while their brothers sitting in tribal council formed a senate or final legislative body whose decisions were binding on the executives of clans and tribes; so that the social organi- zation may be classed as adelphiarchal (like that of the Seri Indians described in earlier reports) in principle, though largely patriarchal in detail. As among the Seri, too, the maternal features of the legislation were paral- leled by recognition of large maternal rights in material possessions—for example, throughout the Iroquoian tribes the control or nominal ownership of lands was in the women as the collective and perpetual mothers of the tribe. These and other points of general interest are set forth in Mr Hewitt’s memoir, which was assigned to the Twenty-first Annual Report. Work IN PHILOLOGY Throughout a considerable part of the year the Director was occupied in developing and applying the system of linguistic classification foreshadowed in the last report. Primarily, languages are devices for the expression of thought; secondarily, they are mechanisms for shaping thought. The simplest languages are emotional and largely demonstrative, comprising not only articulate vocal utterances, but inarticulate sounds, gestures, facial ex- pressions, etc., and these spontaneous expressions of feel - ing and thought grow into the four leading lines of lin- guistic development. The simplest of these is gesture language (or sign language), which arises largely in pan- tomime, but matures under favorable conditions in highly complex systems such as those investigated by the late Colonel Mallery and more recently by Major H. L. Scott (whose studies were unfortunately interrupted by the Spanish-American war). ((fsiobavohiey, Ceohialll Byer, Ahoboven(o}y JS[00) 9 ee ee ke Sasso secscesceses $50, 000. 00 Salaries or compensation of employees. ..........-----.---- $34, O80. 45 Special services=-s en occee eee: Seen eee ee arene $526. 35 Traveling and field expenses.....---..---------- Pea ey2 Bthnologie'specimens! se essse- esses. eee seat ee 3,388. 78 Mamusériptes 232 tase -enes sacs aseeas nesses 2,011. 00 Drawings and ulllustrationsseseseeeesse ee aes eres 407. 95 Negatives): 2. sige 4 ee Ss ee eel a 10. 40 Books and periodicals for library ----.--.-------- 822. 58 Office ren tallies. Aaa eeenise eee ee eee eee 1, 500. 00 Officetturmiinresses =e eee eee bho SA ee 683. 33 DBighting: 3: 005-22 556 ae eoece eee eee 94. 53 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT XLII Siationenry. supplies) ele 2222. =sece+ eu $1, 258. 04 RMAC Mies tena aoe a= sees e eee aeeseohss cee 257.93 Rostarew telegrams: CC. 5-52 2s she seesae cece 72.50 Miscellaneous... 225 0-5- 22 ssecitsosean sa nbs ee 108. 65 $18, 234. 86 Total disbursement -...-----....-- a AN ech ee, POE et $47, 315. 31 Balance duly.ls 19022 ot 2 ese n oe oss eme ase oe Cee 2, 684. 69 ACCOMPANYING PAPERS The three papers presented in connection with this Report mark a forward step in the systematic researches undertaken by the Bureau, and relate to fields already more or less fully occupied by the authors represented. The paper of Dr Fewkes, Two Summers’ Work in Pueblo Ruins, is based on explorations made in the heart of the pueblo country during the years 1896 and 1897, and serves, in connection with his previous writings, to extend our knowledge of the local tribes back into the shadowy time that witnessed the gathering of the clans on the plateaus and in the canyons of the Colorado valley. The ruins described are located in the middle part of the valley of the Little Colorado and in the upper Gila valley, to the south. In the prosecution of these researches Dr Fewkes has made much progress in verifying traditions of the Hopis and in determining affinities and movements of the prehistoric communities; and, by utilizing his rich fund of accumulated knowledge, he has sueceeded in contributing materially to our understancing of the unique culture of this remarkable region. The paper by Dr Thomas, Maya Calendar Systems, deals with the interpretation of the ancient records of the Maya tribes of Middle America. Not having discovered an American Rosetta stone, the students of this impor- tant branch of native culture have given chief attention to the more pregnable features of the records—the systems of numeration as applied to the native calendar. Largely through the persistent and most praiseworthy efforts of A. P. Maudslay, the known examples of glyphs, sculp- tured in stone and wood, modeled in stucco, and painted XLIV BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY on walls, have been accurately recorded and published and are available to students the world over, and discus- sion can now proceed to much better advantage than heretofore. A first paper on the Maya calendar systems by Dr Thomas appeared in the Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau, and the present paper continues the dis- cussion, with special reference to the interpretations of Mr Goodman. These papers necessarily assume a some- what controversial character, but this is probably not to be regretted, since the legitimate outcome of honest con- troversy is a closer approximation of the truth. Already some notable results have been achieved and are generally accepted, and a fair understanding of the entire calendar system may be looked forward to with confidence. ‘“The Hako”’ is an important ceremony enacted by various western tribes, and the record presented in the paper by Miss Fletcher is exceptionally full and satisfac - tory. This record was made among the Pawnees under most favorable conditions. After years of patient work the words and music of all the songs and explanations of the rites and the hidden meanings of every word and act were obtained. This was done mainly through the aid of an old manof the Chaui band whois known as the Kurahus or leader of the ceremony. Like primitive ceremonies generally, this is a prayer, and its motives are peace, plenty, and abundance of offspring. It is intertribal, and not only serves as a means for the interchange of ideas through contact and through gifts but represents one of the many powerful agencies which, by spreading tolerance and friendly feeling, tend to weld scattered warlike bands of men into great peaceful nations. In its melodies, re- corded on the graphophone and transeribed into our notation by a skilful musician; in its meters, carefully studied and analyzed; and in the metrical translation, which has caught so perfectly the spirit of the original, there is abundant material for students of music, poetry, and religion. The Bureau is fortunate in being the means of presenting to the world this superb study of a typical aboriginal ceremony. ACCOMPANYING PAPERS 22. ETA—04——1 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS BY JESSE WALTER FEWKES CONTENTS Page Swirls UGE.» 222. tS eek a A Se Ree Eee Bee, ee ee ene nee Games B 17 Generalrouulinomerepe = sees a2 eee ee ee ey eR Eee Sees 17 Ruins on themduittle Coloradoiriver.-—-_-.-2----- ==. 20 Goncralet eau Tes == eres oases ee Se 20 TRATES TASB Ny se ON /isa oe ee tee ee eee ee ee 22 hove oOmoOlLO Due TOUD melee ea ee Oe eee eo eS ee 23 ICA 2235 25g eee ace 4 see e588 Sos asnesae ee Seeeee 23 onmer inhabitants. a ee eee 24 Jeyetben I 5 <5 2S 5 ce See Seb en see oe eR ee ne eee eee Ree 25 CELT eee Ree 2s Shoe oe SA Oey Roe wo ie | ee 29 SELL DS ee ee Se ees en oes ee eae 29 EC ae nee eee 2c et ce ee eee 30 The Cheylon ruin (Cakwabatyaki)_-.---.-..---.2-2----=---=-- 30 The Chaves pass ruin (Tciibkwitcalobi) -__._--_--------.----- 32 Ruins between Winslow and the Hopi pueblos-_-__-____. ---_-. -_-_-- 34 @avatemuins mearsHlarstatt ===. <= he eee eee 35 Oldcavessae ate acs e aces ee saas b See Sas sense eae eeeeen en 36 IN GWEC VGGE™ meen te. eo eee eee Es ELS Se ee eet 37 BRE yap cl ke Cay OS tee ee ee ae a ee aoe 38 Ruins near the Black falls of the Little Colorado _______-_---- 39 Location and previous exploration. .-..----._------------- 39 General ifeatures sees) ee ee Beene = ee ee 40 (Gary a A oe een ee ee a eee eee eee 42 phe Citadel =a seewe ree Soe eRe ese 43 EG CUR oe ee a Se es ei ry ee ore 43 Rains'B Can eDiets s= sent sre oie tS! eke oe nla 44 CEA ary cin Gl ree es ee ene ee eS 44 Ris iGH land ines: sae eseathet ee oa eae eee Saale 44 EU GLLTI Ke ee es ee ee eee Pe eh) Pe 45 UU ie eee ee eee he SLs es a Se ee 46 UUM ees ae eee passer, Sera Ps ae eel 46 (Cioybl ote Bape ce eoe seme ae Se ene tae ee Bae oS 47 TRA ee cys See er Sa Set 47 IRD Bee ee een eset 22) flee ae oy ae eae eee ese 50 TRIN Ce nee ne a ee ee IN en = Se eee Be 50 6 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS (ETH. ANN, 22 Summer of 1896—continued. Ruins on the Little Colorado river—continued. Ruins between Winslow and the Hopi pueblos—continued. Ruins near the Black falls of the Little Colorado—continued. Group iC es soe caegcsnecce sess ne aca e ee ees see IRVIN Ale Se woe gee ee eee eee IRGINSB Ee. Se ee ee ee Ruins near Honani’s house at Burro spring--_-_--_____--______ Objects from the Little Colorado ruins .-__-_-------.-------------- are POtbORy 22 ceo 2 ee eae see ee ea es General features 2: 222-22 S22 cee Sosa ee oe ee a Classification by color and surface finish_____________________- Coarse unpolished (ware 22) 522-2 penne =e eee Undecorated polished wwrane sees ee eee eee Decorated. polished:;ware,2 == =. =_ 2045202 2 - eae Redvand brown wares cen. oe =e ee ee ee Yellow: wartex2e:2 2-2-0 20c 3o= - ee eee Black wateess- === s5e-6 eS ee eRe eee eee Black and white ware_-----_--------. See ee er ae Redtandiblackaware y=. 22 Red, black, and white ware___.___-._--.-_-- che sea! ‘Wehite‘and' green:wares Go 2 = eee ee eee @lassificationi bye Orie ees eee ae ee eee eee Mood bowls.4.2..2° bebe tes 5 ee ee ee Wases and jars a. ee Se ee ee ee Dadles2 2: 6 oF 2. 2 22 as ees = ce ee eee Canteens: 2222.22). 2asei sae siea te. @ ee eee eee Cups! eso eee er RO Fae ee eee ‘Animaltforms ts 2228 22 sees eae a ee eee ee Slipper-shapedvessels=22 5-2 eee = ae eee See eee See Decorative designs — 2.0 86s ee ee ee ee eS General characters =~ — 54.06 2s ae ee ee ee nee uma ieuress sass oa oe ee ee ee ae Quadruped figures 2 - =<... 9 2222 eee eee ee Birdfigures: . =o... 5-622 ees Basa eee ee ee IMSeCh iS Unes seas ea ne eer hs ee ee Arachnidfigures2« 4.22 22 2-- 3o=5 «= ee ae ee ee Geometricaldesigns: 2 5222522. .-65 522 = = eee eee Ornaments, 2=*5. 8. oases ee ee aa ee aera cane Generaleicatures rand elonms 2 sees ea nee oe MSCOLA TIONS see Oe ne ree ee nen er ise pan Senet See IRotbenyecomMihe rain 42 = 22 ese ee een esa ee eee eee General featuresiand form!’ =. 4-5) s2-- = eee ee eee eee Mecoration ss 2 2. s25 en 8 tno aise ee eee sees eae Miscellaneous objects from the ruin __------_..------------------. VETERE AAG [2 cc lie a nr ate Ae : RAINS Meare OLDLOO Kio eeas esa eee Peres ee ree ee OpjectsrtrompWiOodtniiy DM Uhe) eee ease ae eee ea oer ee Ancient habitations in the petrified forest --_..--_-_---------. .--- Mounr-mileirdin = 22. 22-0 seeks ee ee ea anne nee onan se eee cee ee General plan 22-3 2-s. acta e ee oes sone ae eee as oeeesee Seles ASTOOTOALD GG CUI Nise tee oe eee ean eee ee see es eee ee Suburban Ovens 525 eae ae see See arcs aen Set Sekwe ks ces Sesee Wemeteries i. a= se we ae ae se eee meee eee sens Wolbehlons 2352s. soe ee eo Re Sse he alee cee ea re aun nee POULELY, ot oce rene Sock ceo eee ee wos see eo ee see Se epee SES Principality pes ss-2-- s-- 2s 2 - see oss eee ee a ee ee ecee Galaaty PO see tee eee se eee ee Sooke a ane tae mcs es 8 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS (ETH, ANN, 22 Summer of 1897—continued. Page Four-mile ruin—continued. Collections—continued. Pottery—continued. POrms=y o.- Steet hoese: Shee cacteae= ea eee oe eee 142 Decoration... 2 seus 2.5 ashen ase nao eee aehe eee 142 Human fioures! ae eee a eae ee eee eee 143 Quadruped figures ----.-.---- SE eRe eee 145 iBirdfieures:224- == <3) se ae eee ee ees 146 Butterfly figures: -2 3-22.52. - ooo eso aenn ee eee see 148 Heather: decorations - see) < see ee eee ee 149 Geometricalsiounes tess = ae ee eee een ee 150 External ornamentation on food bowls -_-----------_- 152 Riain= Clo waded Csi Sirsa see eee eee 155 Character and treatment of mortuary pottery --------_-_- 158 (Potterisioubfit oss 6 22-2 hosts ee serene ee ee eee 158 Stonenmplementsresee = see eee see ae ee ee ee eee 159 Stoneislabs)2=—- <" 45-2 aero Bee on ee ee ee eee ss 160 Copper bells 2 se desie aac ee eaten eeise oe pee ea ee oe nee Eee 162 IPrayer-Sticksi= === eee sentast oes aaeeee Ba iteiaxents saa eeeieee 163 Gourd rattles! 222 <6 2c5s22/os= 925 ss5oc= hese ce se cueee = =e ee eee 163 @rmaments: 2) ss =) = a a Soe ee oe See ee eee 163 Bonevimplements; 2-202 =o 2S eee ee a ee eee 64 iAnimaliremains 2-2 8a pS noe Nee el ae 164 Tequubals|aterhom Nowbesoand sys bobe aoe Sees SES. Sse e 8 2 ee ee bat 164 Ruins ab Pinedales= sass. s=2ss=— a sSiahhe robe, ea eee ea ae aoe 164 he buildin gS! a= — 2s ep acs sae etcetera eee 164 @ollections' = =.= Sse eh es 2a aoe = ee ee eee ee See ea 166 Stothiran chert: =a ea ee 167 Ruinstin: PuebloiViiej ove Ses 5- = = aor ee ae ee eee 168 The valley and its history—general features of the ruins _________- 168 DistribuponiaL ruins in pee) OVE ey Olsens =e eae 70 Bipley?s witty) 6-32) 5 ago. sa d-t en a eee Ot ee ee eee ee 17 Buena Vista ---.-- Fass Soseis San ae ig vece eee Soe oe ee 17 Otheriruing: 2255.2 - sean ol eee se oes s Skee eee See eee eee 173 Changes in thetvalleyisince: Wi8472 2-2 S222 2 een eee mali Hormer populationiof the valley oss se) sess nee == eee ee 175 Cremationtof thetdead (22 42 sas 2 ose en ee eee 175 Architecture. -_-_---- SR ts 2 eee eee a Wa: J AY ae ea 176 Terraced gardensiae-= saver oases A a ee ee ee 177 Prehistoricurr cation in ePueplonViey} Oye ae ee 178 Pottery from jPucbl ove] Oss see ee eee 17 Coloriand§surfaceutinishs ses ee ay (Wmdecorated aoe baw ait eee eee 179 IDecoratedtroughiyare es eee a a 179 FEWKES] CONTENTS cc Summer of 1897—continued. Page Ruins in Pueblo Viejo—continued. Pottery from Pueblo Viejo—continued. Color and surface finish—continued. lundecoratedired) ware 22 22 ees ene we eee 180 Decorated black and white ware ---..-...__---.---------- 180 Mecoratedkorayawareyee- 3- eee ees ao een ere 180 Mecoration, 2e=- sae 2 ae aes Foe ee 2 ak oe ae Se 180 StoneobyectsifromiuPueblo Wiejo —= 2--2-—- -=-- ee ee 183 itmplem enitspee eee peers ean ae ee oe eee 183 Stonelslabs eee se see = se Sees eee wien race eeeae eee SoU aS 185 ©therstonewop jects. ee a ne es ee es eee 186 Shelliornaments/ from! Pueblo) Viejo ==2:—----------=2------=5--=—-- 187 Clitshousestoni bonita creekssee=- see ona ne oe ae ee eee 187 Roinsin! the) foothills of Mount Graham <-2--=-----=--- === 2-5 -- === 187 Sacrticialicavesie==ssa= ae ene == see aoe Se sete ote sees ees 187 Collections from’ a cave'in the Nantacks.-.---.--.-.---.-------------- 188 Biipyavases trom) southern Arizonaie 9 -- 2s) aes e nes 2 soe ee eo 189 Distribution of decorated pottery in Arizona --------.---------------- 192 Evolution of the pueblo type of architecture .._....--.----.-=--------- 193 ILLUSTRATIONS Pa; PuaTe I. Old caves, near Flagstaff, Arizona ___._.___..._..._...-------- 196 i: (New caves; near Plagstatf, Arizona ..-.. -.52-.- =) 2.222528 8, 196 It, Entrance to New caves, near Flagstaff, Arizona ______________- 196 IV. Turkey Tank caves, near Flagstaff, Arizona __________._____._- 196 V. Interior of cave near Flagstaff, Arizona_-__-._...-....____...-- 196 VI. Interior of cave near Flagstaff, Arizona_____________________-- 196 VII. View from the Citadel, group A, Black falls, Little Colorado EUV CL RAT ZAOU rae ae ee a a epee ee Se 196 VIII. Ruin G, group a, Black falls, Little Colorado river, Arizona__ IX. Ruins Ho and J, group a, Black falls, Little Colorado river, PAIZO 112 ee ee ee ese Sen eee” See een eee 196 X. Ruin J, group 4, Black falls, Little Colorado river, Arizona__.. 196 XI. Ruin J, group 4, Black falls, Little Colorado river, Arizona___. 196 XII. Ruin a, group B, Black falls, Little Colorado river, Arizona___. 196 XIII. Section B, ruin a, group B, Black falls, Little Colorado river, PATIZ OR Ape teeta ae ee Been ae ae nt Res eae oe Ee ee 196 XIV. Ruin a, group B, Black falls, Little Colorado river, Arizona_.__ 196 XV. Chimney in ruin 4, group B, Black falls, Little Colorado river, PATTAZONA == + eae anne = ee se es SR eae ae Seta eae 196 XVI. a, Reservoir, ruin a, group B, Black falls, Little Colorado river, Arizona; b, Small ruin near camp, Black falls, Little Coloradosriver;;Arizonajcae 22 - ence ee = las = ee eee 196 XVII. Ruin a, group c, Black falls, Little Colorado river, Arizona (view from the east) -.------------- eee ee ee 196 XVIII. Ruin a, group c, Black falls, Little Colorado river, Arizona (yew, tromstheswest)/ pe lees es oe eee ee eee 196 XIX. Ruin 4, group c, Black falls, Little Colorado river, Arizona (Miewsiromitheinorih) = see sees ee ee ee ee 196 XX. Vase trom Chevlomi ruin, “Arizona 9292-222) 2 2 ee 196 REX Vase LromeHomolo bin Anz OU eas a aoe ee ee ee ee 196 XOX Vases trom OMOlObiPATIZOnase =e ee oe aes See Sees 196 XXIII. Food bowls from Homolobi, Arizona.__-________.__. .________- 196 XXIV. Food bowl from Four-mile ruin, Arizona.__...........-.--___- 196 XXV. Food bowls from Four-mile ruin, Arizona__.___---._______.____ 196 XXVI. Food bowl from Four-mile ruin, Arizona___.-_.---__---______- 196 RemVil. hood bowls trom Homolobi, Arizona__--2---25 2-2 196 XXVIII. Food bowls from Chaves pass and Chevlon, Arizona. __________ 196 XXIX. Food bowls from Chaves pass and Homolobi, Arizona ________- 196 PLATE XXX. XXXiI. XXXII. XXXII. XXXIV. XXXV. XXXVI. XXXVI. XXXVIII. XXXIX. XL. XI. XLIT- XLIII. XLIV. XLV. XLVI. XLVII. XLVIII. XLIX. . Vases from Shumopoyi, Arizona LY. LVI. LVII. LVIII. LIX. LX. LXI. LXIL. LXIIl. LXIV. LXV. LXVI. LXVII. LXVIII. LXIX. LXXx. . Plan of Kintiel ruin, Arizona TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH J Vases from Homolobi, Arizona_______- ee aoe ee iViases/LromsElomolo bie eAv1Z On cae ee ee Vases tron Elomolo bi. Avi Z0ne see aes a Vases trom seELomo] ooieAas1z O11 eee eee Dippers from Cheylon, Homolobi, and Chaves pass, Arizona_ Food bowls from Cheylon, Homolobi, and Four-mile ruin, AT 17 08 Se aes = See ee eee Pottery objects from Chaves pass and Homolobi, Arizona___ Food bowls from Cheylon, Arizona _.._.....-..._..____- oa Wasesiirom Chev oni eA 70nd Food bowls from Cheylon, Arizona ________________- Food bowls from Four-mile ruin, Arizona ________._______-- Food bowls from Four-mile ruin, Arizona Food bowls from Four-mile ruin, Arizona Food bowls from Cheylon and Homolobi, Arizona __________ Mosaic frog from Chaves pass, Arizona _____._____. __.____- Bone implements from Chaves pass, Arizona _______________ Stone slab with rain-cloud design, from Cheylon, Arizona__ Vase and food bowl from Cheylon, Arizona_________________ Vases from Shumopovi, Arizona Vase from Shumopovi, Arizona . Food bowls from Shumospovi, Arizona_______.._---__------- . Modern cemetery at Hopi pueblos, Arizona____._ _________- . Surface of mounds at Four-mile ruin, Arizona, before exca- Vation £uo" 2 Se Se. ae Seta. 2 es eee ee Food bowls from Epley’s ruin, Gila valley, Arizona Food bowls from Four-mile ruin, Arizona Excavations at Four-mile ruin, Arizona ______.____. __- Plan of a room in’ Four-mile ruin, Arizona Vase and pitcher from Four-mile ruin, Arizona______------- Vase and food bowl from Four-mile ruin, Arizona Food bowls from Four-mile ruin, Arizona Vases from Four-mile ruin, Arizona Food bowls from Four-mile ruin, Arizona_________________- Spiral design on food bow] from Four-mile ruin, Arizona —__- Perforated stone slab and loom stones from Four-mile ruin, IATAZ ON A Meee Reames aaa oe eal ee ee ee ete Plan of Buena Vista ruin, upper Gila valley, Arizona______- Food bowls and vase from Pueblo Viejo, Gila valley, Arizona- Vase from Pueblo Viejo, Gila valley, Arizona -_-_------------ Food bowl and vases from Pueblo Viejo, Gila valley, Ari- VA) 0b? ee ae ee i e yeS SSaan ne Se SSE poses Map showing distribution of ancient pottery in Arizona_--_- ANN. 22 Page 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 196 FEWKES] ILLUSTRATIONS 13 Page MT CUREAE ee MA prOLMANCIONG CUSRYAD - 2-2 8-252 see es hese one eee ae esa = 21 ORRIN ELOMOLODe ose se eo a oe ee os See oe Seen Sees 26 SaPlanotany “Oldicaye:: dwelling |=) 55... e est eae ee 37 APwhineyCiaAdely CTOUD A. 88 === cee oe oes sea eae Gee 43 He Plante main, gOnOUP Act 22 20 42 -2— oo ta ee =e eee a nee ane 45 Ga Séchiones a roins AM OTOUPIB . 2 aasee = os. Sees ease eee Scenes 46 Pe elaAMvOi@nechlOnessirtIn A STOUp IB. 2-2 = =e soe eee 47 See inkOtmseG GOMys att Ary PTCOUP Bae = 9a - Se ee ee eee ene eee 48 Om Evuimeaedor OUpiG.eLrOm) tne SOU bn. ean eee ee ee a 51 HO MPR lancotaruiniraneLOUp Case ser. 2) mae an Boas aes pee ne tee 52 iP lanko feruinus. oTOUpI Ol see= a= ase sess eee ee ee o4 12. Ladle with divided handle, from Chevlon--_-_-_----.-----.------ 2 13. Ladle with figure on handle, from Chevlon-_ ._____------------- 63 14. Cup with bird designs -__--_- ee Boots st eee See 64 iS Dippertromullomolobis sa=4= 945-5 225 a6 soso eee eee eee 65 ifs Minoo nromublOmOloOl sass = ae ee: pw Seo eee 65 17. Cup, rough ware, decorated, from Cheylon -____--.-.--------- 65 ELS eV eee ee ee eee ee eR Sena ane ae 66 One Minot om @hevlonen sere =. c= es ane Sse see sos odae cease 66 20. Duck-shaped vessel from Chevlon -_.---.--.------------------- 67 iy Jan with four knobs, from Hlomolobi-=- 2-2 --22.5-- <+-5--42=- 67 22. Bird-shaped vessel from Chevilon -_.......-..---.----=--.----- 68 235 (Bird-snake:vase from) Chevloni.--2-- === =-52.9224-5- ee Sense = 68 24, Footprints on inside of vase from Homolobi ------------------ 70 25. Quadruped figure on food bowl from Chaves pass- ---.-------- 71 26. Quadruped figure on food bowl from Chevlon_ ___-------.--.-- 72 Disa ase: wibh) beat’ s-paw design. —2-.- 222-226. 22-225 cn ees nsa ten 73 28. Mythic bird figures and rain-cloud symbols on food bowl from (Chev one ene eae re tae Sen er eee te Ode Jee eee 74 29. Vase with four bird figures, from Homolobi-___. --_-_- -------- 75 30. Mythic lird figure on food bowl from Chaves pass--------. ---- 75 31. Bird design on food bowl from Homolobi _____----_------. ---- 76 32. Bird figure on food bowl from Homolobi - --------------------- 77 33. Mythic bird figure on food bow] from Chevlon_-_----_---._--- 78 34. Bird figure on food bowl from Chevlon-.---_-_-_-------.-------- 79 35a Hoodiibowdawathibindtdesiong =) 2 a 2 Be ee 80 36. Vase with bird symbols, from Homolobi -.___. --_-------- iS 81 7. Spider and sun emblem on food bowl from Homolobi ___- __-__- 82 38. Three lines of life; design on food bowl from Cheylon______---- 83 39. Geometrical designs on food bowl from Chaves pass - -_-__- ---- 84 40. Broken fret on food bowl from Cheylon_____-_------------___- 85 41. Food bowl with geometrical patterns --__--_. ----------------- 85 An. Mosaic zorgeu from Chaves pass: .-------- 5. =2s<-s ase === aoe 86 3) bone ear pendants fromiCheyvlom 22- =. 222] eee. == eee aes 86 44. Lignite ear pendant from Chevlon ---------------------------- 87 14 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN, 22 Page EIGurRE45;, Lionite gorgets. 2222-4. =e == oe eee ee ees 88 465 Incisedjarmiletitrom @hevlons sss ee ee 89 47. Armlet with inlaid turquoise, from Chevlon ________-._._____- 90 48. Shell used for rattle, from Chevlon -----_--.-__-----------__-- 91 49: ‘Shell ornament from) Homolobia22 22 s25s— oat aa eee 92 BOS Shelliitros trom" Chewy] ones ya ee ee eee 92 dle ShelliobjecttromiChevlon eae esse ness sae ee ee 92 52. Shell gorget from Chevlon ----_-.----- se OR os Ss ee ee ee 92 8) Bonelaiwiitromi@ havestpassas sean eee ery eee ee 94. 542 (Carved boneawlitrom)Homolobicassss-= ss 2220 ne == eee 94 55. Bone implement from Chaves pass_-_-_---_--.------------------ 94 D6: Bone tubemromHomolobia sso ese see a eee 95 57. Stick used by stick swallower, from Chevlon -______ -_.___.__- 95 OSs Wiskiof turtleyshelle trom: Chevlone sees eee eee ee eee 96 59. Kaolin cup from Chaves pass_-___.-.-_--------- Shy Hosins Soe cee 96 60. Matting from Chevlon -____ Be ss set ASA ES mesa ee eh SS 97 61. Basketry of Oraibi type, from Chevlon----__--.-.-------.---- 2 98 62. Basketry of Oraibi type, showing manner of plaiting__________ 99 63. Basketry of coiled type, from Chevlon _-____--__------_---_-_- 99 645 (Gaming canesfrom'Chevlone. seen ae a ee eee 101 65. stoneimplement from) Homolobinsss-2 24-5 aes se ee eee 102 66ar Scone axs LO MBE OM Oo] 0p lee ee ee 102 672 Copper/bellitromiChay.esipass see ea eee 111 68: Bowl with snout, from Shumopovi__-_-2-----=22---=-_- =e 114 69. Plumed snake; design on food bowl from Shumopovi_________- 114 70. Mythic bird and game of chance; design on food bowl from Shum opoyaleetes = a0- see ee ee es ee ene, 115 71. Bird design on food bowl from Shumopoyi.-_------------.-_-- 116 72. Mythic bird design on food bowl from Shumopovi-_---_-______- 117 73. Symbolic bird design on food bowl from Shumopoyvi ------ ---- 117 74. Gambling canes and bird; design on food bowl fromShumopovi_ 118 75. Dipper with decorated handle, from Kintiel__.---_-----.---.--- 130 762 Coiled: vaseuromy Kanticll 5222s ke ee ee ee 130 77. Two-handled bowl from Kintiel ___------------- , BAe PR Sa 131 78) GlobulambowlefromeKantiel a2 eee ee ee 131 79 Hand lerotidippernyer omy Kein tie lees ee eee 131 805 Erogidesign oni bowl fromKintiel 2 s= sas eee ee 132 S15 Hloodibowiliir omit ee ea ee eee 132 82. Bird design on food bowl from Kintiel---.--..-.-.------------ 132 83. CuprfromKantiel ese s == one ojo See eee a eee 133 84> Dippertiromycintiel ee sees sats ee eeeeeee ae 133 85. Stone birds from Woodruff butte ---____- 235 A ee ee 135 86. View of Four-mile ruin from river bed_-_-_-----------------.-- 136 87. Upright posts in wall at Four-mile ruin-_-_--....._.-.---------- 138 FEWKES] ILLUSTRATIONS . 15 Page Fiaeure 88. Ornamented rough bowl from Four-mile ruin_______________- 141 89. Small saucer from Hour-mile ruin ---_-___=-_---_----_..-_.-- 142 90. Human figure on food bowl from Four-mile ruin_____________ 144 91. Bird design on food bowl from Four-mile ruin _______________ 146 2. Bird design on food bowl from Four-mile ruin ______________- 147 93. Bird designs on food bowl from Four-mile ruin ______________ 147 94. Bird design on food bowl from Four-mile ruin ______________- 148 95. Butterfly design on food bowl from Four-mile ruin__________- 149 96. Sun emblem on food bow] from Four-mile ruin____________. _- 150 97. Bowl with double spiral design, from Four-mile ruin_________ 151 98. Decorated vase from Four-mile ruin _____________-___________- 151 99. Unknown design on food bowl from Four-mile ruin_________- 152 100. Bear design on exterior of food bowl from Four-mile ruin____ 153 101. Twin bird design on exterior of food bowl from Pinedale____- 154 102. Bird design on exterior of food bowl from Four-mile ruin ____ 154 103.’ Bear’s-paw design on exterior of food bowl from Four-mile SefOU NA “ans Hn Se Repel ee ees ES, ee 6 eS SaaS eR ee Be es 155 104. Geometrical design on exterior of food bowl from Four-mile PFC ee en ee ee Ren coe ees Bae 155 105. Cloud emblem on food bow] from Four-mile ruin ___________- 157 106. Stone used in belt frame, from Four-mile ruin --____________- 160 107. (Stoneslab from: Four-mile roin'.-..--..--2.---_=-----=.------ 161 LOS Copper belli:trom- Hour-mile ruin - == 5222-2 2-= 5-222 3522522-- 162 109. Bone implement from Pinedale ruin ___________---______----- 166 110. Decorated slipper jar from Pueblo Viejo___________________-- 181 111. Moccasin-shaped jar from Pueblo Viejo___--.-___--.--_-_-.-- 181 112. Arrow polisher from Pueblo Viejo-_-_-___. _--.----------------- 182 113. Arrow polisher from Pueblo Viejo--.-__-----------.--------- 183 IiaaiMetatonrom-Pueblo ViejOrcc 42-25-88 seek eee 184 115. Unknown stone object from Pueblo Viejo _____-------------- 184 116. Ceremonial stone slab from Pueblo Viejo _-_-__---------------- 185 117. Ceremonial stone slab from Pueblo Viejo _-_--_-------------- 186 118: Stoneifetish from Pueblo Viejo 2." - =2--22:225 222-222 22--5- 186 119. Indented bowl from a cave in the Nantacks --__-------------- 188 120. Small amphora from a cave in the Nantacks --_-_----.-------- 189 121. Human effigy vase from a cave in the Nantacks-_.--_-.------- 189 1225 Bihipy vase from PueblowViejonn a. === 5--= <2 oe 191 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS By JESSE WALTER FEWKES SUMMER OF 1896 GENERAL OUTLINE The following report embodies the results of archeological field work for the Bureau of American Ethnology in the summer of 1896.4 The author was fortunate in having as his assistant Dr Walter Hough, of the National Museum, who, at his suggestion, took up in addition a study of Hopi ethnobotany, the results of which study have already been published.’ A week after his departure from Washington on May 30 the author began excavations at a ruin called Homolobi, near Winslow, Arizona, where he worked continuously until the close of June. During July anda part of August he excavated ruins at the mouth of Chevlon fork, on the Little Colorado river, and at Chaves pass.° The short distance of Homolobi and the Chevlon ruin from Winslow allowed him to make daily trips from that town to the ruins, where the workmen were encamped. At the close of each day’s work the objects found on that day were carried to the hotel, where they were catalogued and packed for shipment. Even with this precau- tion some of the specimens were appropriated by visitors attracted by the beauty of certain of the pottery objects. White archeological work in the vicinity of a town has advantages so far as the practical work of boxing and shipping are concerned, it has many disadvantages, one of the least of which is that just mentioned. The considerable distance of the Chaves pass ruins from a town necessitated a camp at the diggings, which was far from a hardship, considering the beautiful forests and the fine water near the ruins. A camp was made at Old Shumopovi during a short stay at this ruin. «A preliminary report on the field work of this year may be found in the Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution for 1896. 6 American Anthropologist, May, 1897. eThis report was written and transmitted for publication in 1898. Since that time there has been considerable archeological activity in Arizona, and several collections have been made in the region, even in the ruins here considered. Certain specimens in these collections add impor- tant data to the discussion of the culture and migrations of the people who once inhabited this part of the Territory. 22 ETH—04——2 7 18 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS (ETH. ANN. 22 The objective material collected numbered 1,875 entries in the National Museum catalog, but since many of these entries include sev- eral objects, the actual number of specimens obtained was somewhat larger. The specimens were collected from the following localities: Homolobis. == =2 22/22 2s oe ee ee 700 Chevlon fork (Hopi name, Cakwabaiyaki) ---------.------ 635 Chaves pass (Hopi name, Tctitbkwitcalobi) -__--___-______- 284 Shumopovilee. ss a= -= 2 ee Sousa ete cores usar eseece 108 Various other ruins ee. ss see =e = ee eee 97 @1,824 Other specimens were obtained from various ruins on the Little Colorado, and from Mishongnovi, Awatobi, Sikyatki, and Old Walpi. By far the greatest number of specimens collected were objects of a mortuary nature from the cemeteries. Although many of these were broken in getting them out of the ground, it is estimated that over one-half were entire, and fully two-thirds of the remainder have been so well repaired that they answer all the purposes of the student. The breakage was in part due to the inexperience of the workmen, but most of the vases, bowls, and the like were fractured by the earth, logs, or stones thrown on them in the graves when they were buried. Each bowl appeared to have formerly contained mor- tuary offerings of some kind, as food, paints, or prayer-sticks, and it was not rare to find food bowls piled up in nests one within another. There is no conclusive evidence that any large number of vessels were broken by design when interred. At the close of the archeological work on the ruins mentioned, the author witnessed the Flute ceremony at Mishongnovi, and the Snake dances at Oraibi, Shipaulovi, and Shumopovi. Some of his observa- tions on the latter have been published in the Sixteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, and a short description of the Mishongnovi Flute altars, observed in 1896, appeared in the Journal of American Folk-Lore. The author also made a few studies of the Walpi Flute observance, which supplemented those already published elsewhere, and enabled him to prepare an extended memoir on this important ceremonial as performed on the East mesa.” On his return to the railroad, after the close of the summer’s work, the author visited Zuni to prospect for ruins in anticipation of future exploration, and made a flying trip to the pueblos Isleta, Sandia, and Tesuki. A small collection of ethnological objects was made at these pueblos, and other specimens were purchased at Santa Fe; these, con- sisting of old paintings on skin from ancient pueblo missions, have been presented to the National Museum. It is believed that there is considerable material in the hands of traders or others in the South- west, illustrative of the early mission period, which ought to find a a Besides the 1.824 specimens catalogued in the field 51 additional objects were entered in the National Museum catalog. bSee Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, 1900, part 2, p. 952-1011. FEWKES] VISIT TO SANDIA—RUINS NEAR HOLBROOK 1) permanent home in the National Museum. Some of these objects are very old, and show a mingling of Pueblo and Christian symbolism which is highly instructive, but in the rapid extinction of old manners and customs they are being replaced by more modern objects, and willsoon disappear completely. Their preservation might well occupy the attention not only of the ethnologist but also of the historian. Although the visit to Pueblo Sandia was a short one, of the nature of a reconnaissance, it was full of interest. For some unknown reason this pueblo seems to have been overlooked by most ethnological students of the pueblos, but to one interested in the Hopi Indians, Sandia presents many highly instructive problems. It is peopled by descendants of the people of Payiipki, now a ruin on the Middle mesa, and no doubt the Sandians have legends of the former home of their ancestors in Tusayan.¢ Sandia has a large kiva, not unlike those in other Rio Grande pueblos, where old rites are undoubtedly still perpetuated. It would be interesting to know something of the nature of these ceremonies, in order to compare them with those of the Tusayan ritual. The author hoped that he would be able to find some ruins in the immediate neighborhood of Holbrook, Arizona, and he visited the mesa north of the town with that thought in mind; but he was disappointed, although evidences of temporary camps and a few picto- graphs were discovered. He heard, however, of ruins at Carrizo, and saw a few beautiful specimens of stone objects from that locality. The trip from Navajo Springs to Zuni failed to reveal any consider- able ruins along that trail, but the examination was a superficial one. There are several large ruins not far from the Navajo railroad station, which were not examined.’ There are small ruins on some of the hills of the bad lands of the pet- rified forests® near Holbrook. One or two of these are of consider- able size, and many objects indicative of former visitants or occupants were found on the ground about them. The author succeeded in dis- covering a single grave in one of the mounds, and excavated from if a few fragments of pottery, but these objects did not occur in suffi- cient quantities to justify extended work. Not far from Adamana station, on the Atlantic and Pacific railroad, there is a large ruin on a hill, which visitors to the petrified forest have no doubt noticed. This ruin is of considerable size, and promises a rich yield of archeological material should reasonable excavations be made out- side its walls. aOna map by Menchero the site of Payiipki is called ‘‘ Mesa de las Tiguas.” indicating that it was peopled by Tiwas. Some of the Hopis say that relatives of the Asa clan once lived there. > Some of these rnins were specially studied in the summer of 1897, and will be described later in an account of the operations of that year. e This remarkable collection of fossil trees is about 15 miles from Holbrook, and may be called one of the wonders of Arizona. There are in reality three petrified forests, or three places where the bad lands are eroded sufficiently to lay bare the huge fossil trees which they cover. The signs of former habitation observed in the section nearest Holbrook show comparatively late occupation. 20 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 RUINS ON THE LITTLE COLORADO RIVER GENERAL FEATURES The plains and mesas bordering the Little Colorado river and its tributaries were sites of populous pueblos in prehistoric times. There remain many descendants of this former population who now inhabit pueblos distant from that stream. The Zunis alone still live on the bank of one of its tributaries, and from the source of the river to its mouth the ancient pueblos have long since been deserted. It is asserted by certain Tusayan clans that their ancestors formerly inhabited the pueblos now in ruins on this river, and traditionists have names for these villages. The plan of the present expedition was to explore ancient ruins claimed by the traditionists of the Patki, Patun, and Piba people as a former home of their families, in order to determine the truth of their legends and to gather what archeological data there were bearing on the prehistoric migrations of the people who inhabited the western section of the pueblo area. The ruins along the Little Colorado do not differ greatly in general character from those in the vicinity of the inhabited Hopi pueblos. They are situated both in the river valley and on bordering mesas, and, owing to the open character of the country, are mostly of the vil- lage type. Some of the tributaries of the Little Colorado in the Mogo- llon mountains are said to be overlooked by cliff houses, several of which, in Clear creek canyon, still remain well preserved, according to report; but these ruins have not been investigated. Drifting sand has buried most of the ruins of the valley so deeply that the walls of few of them remain standing above ground. As a rule they are built on natural mounds, which, near Chevlon fork, have a gravelly character. There is little to guide one in a determination of the probable age of the ruins. No evidences of Spanish influence were detected in the excavations, but this does not, of course, necessarily mean that the pueblos were not inhabited contemporaneously with, or long after, the advent of the Spaniards. It is instructive to determine the probable causes of the evacuation of these river villages by ancestral Hopi clans. Among other influ- ences, the following may be mentioned. In the legends concerning the forays of the Apaches it is always recounted that they attacked the Hopi pueblos from the south. Although these vigorous nomadie peo- ple originally came from the north, they seem to have early taken possession of the portion of Arizona between modern Tusayan and the southern boundaries of the Territory, raiding as they wished the Pima settlements on the south, and the Hopi on the north. The exposed pueblos along the Little Colorado were poorly adapted for defense, and this may have led to their abandonment. FEWKES] ABANDONMENT OF LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 21 Some years ayo two Mormon towns were built not far from the pres- ent site of Winslow, and contiguous to Homolobi. These towns, Brig- ham and Sunset, were prosperous for many years, and their inhabitants cultivated extensive farms, which were irrigated from tributaries of the Little Colorado. The remains of one of their acequias can still be seen skirting the river side of Homolobi, and many of the stones for the walls of the towns are said to have been obtained from the Indian pueblo. The Mormon town is itself now a picturesque ruin, having Scale Spr tet : . s ibt << la ortbiautie® He OXI N CE rms FURS BGs Canyon te at ntieshont corse Sa aeenaiie a oe FOSAYAN H r 2 Ruins, (Gains Giants Chair gg PF Mera su / / Ruind a £ < W/o ge See NT ; a *\ SS / b Z 7 Chifaney Butte s Bellerto LurkeyTan ly a wt Can = Ly 7 q S64 la oA d : . as pepe” 4 U9 \ 4 fe Farge Ey O ee, ve 4 J op ») ? s Lod anysfablp Laws nee Rabb = Iry « eohioe 1 g 2 Pennisi Ate 1 \ 2 o Saar, \ ry é , y $ f i lle , 4 i) - — \ PB 3 \ \ fe ee 2 SUNSET PASS_—-~~5— H e < we Sire 1g SF 2 a , Holbro ny ‘s ~ Woodruff f rs is Bi A io & Chev | o az | , "Heber | ¢ f ‘Snow’! is Strawberry 2 é a Zed Fic. 1. Map of Ancient Tusayan. (Itinerary indicated by dotted lines.) been gradually abandoned. One reason for the desertion of Sunset is said to have been the alkalinity of the soil, which irrigation had developed. If this explanation accounts for the failure of the Mor- mon farmers, it might also apply to their Hopi predecessors. The failure of crops may have led the Indians to seek other localities better suited for farming. However that may be, atthe present time, 1896, the river valley opposite Homolobi has been turned into a profit- able farm by a Winslow farmer, and when the author worked at 22 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 Homolobi this farm was green with alfalfa and various market vege- tables. A failure of the rain and the corn crop is distinetly mentioned as one of the causes which led the Patki and other southern Hopi clans to leave their settlements along the Little Colorado, but it is also stated that they were afflicted by a kind of gnat or sand flea in some of their earlier halting places. Possibly their dwellings became so infected with vermin as to lead to their abandonment.¢@ The Little Colorado river was dry during the work at Homolobi, and was crossed and recrossed almost anywhere, the sole obstruction being the steep banks, which were several feet high. Late in the summer, however, it became a raging torrent, impassable save in one or two places, and even these were dangerous on account of the many quick- sands. It is not improbable that the great freshets of the river may have had an important influence in the abandonment of the second ruin of the Homolobi group, one side of which is completely worn away, although of course it is not unlikely that this happened after its abandonment. Evidence of similar erosion is also apparent on the river side of ruin 1 of the Homolobi group; cemeteries on that side, if they ever existed, have long since disappeared. RUINS NEAR WINSLOW As has been noted, the Hopis say that the ancestors of the Patki or Water-house? people lived in the far south. This tradition is very definite, and if even declares that they once inhabited a pueblo called Homolobi, stating that the position of this ancestral dwelling was near where the railroad crosses the Little Colorado, not far from the town called Winslow. With this exact statement as a guide the author went immediately to that town, having made arrangements with some Hopi workmen to join him there. The ruins on the Little Colorado near Winslow were identified as the Homolobi group by Mr Cosmos Mindeleff, who mentions 10 ruined pueblos in this immediate vicinity, but his reference to them is brief, and includes no attempt at description. The best-informed inhab- itants of Winslow were ignorant of the existence of ruins near their village, and but for the confidence he had in the legends of the Hopis the author also would have doubted their existence. The site of Homolobi was found to be exactly where the Hopi stories placed it, and archeological results confirmed the identification. The author found not only Homolobi, but also three other ruins in the imme- diate neighborhood of Winslow, and before a month had passed demon- «The trail from Beaver Head in the Verde valley to Flagstaff, especially not far from Rattle- snake Tanks, has a very bad reputation for the small gnat, which gives much annoyance to travelers. bThe name Water-house means cloud, and the members of this clan are called both the rain and the cloud people. FEWKES] RUINS NEAR WINSLOW 23 strated that this was one of the richest fields in Arizona for archeo- logical work, although previous to this visit not a single specimen had been described from the region. It was also the author’s desire to see how the ruins of the Little Colorado south of Tusayan were connected with those on the banks of its tributary, the Zuni river, higher up the watershed. For that purpose he examined somewhat in detail a ruin opposite the station Hardy, on the Atlantic and Pacific railroad, near where Chevlon creek empties into the Little Colorado river. This ruin will be ealled in this report the Chevlon ruin. Its Hopi name is Cakwabaiyaki. The objects exhumed from the cemeteries of the Chevlon ruin have close likenesses to those of ancient Zuni ruins, as well as to those of Homolobi, which is claimed by the Hopis. A logical interpretation of these resemblances would seem to be that the culture differentiation of the two peoples was not as wide in ancient times as it is af present. The inhabitants of the villages of the Little Colorado and its tribu- tary, the Zuni river, were formerly closely related, and, no doubt, when these villages were deserted, some of the clans went to Zuni and others to the Hopi pueblos. In subsequent times greater differentia- tion took place, which led to the present conditions. It was also desirable to push the examination of the ruins of this drainage area as far south as possible, for which reason two ruins in Chaves pass, about 30 miles south of Winslow, were investigated. This was the southern limit of field work in 1896, and in the last month of the summer the author followed the trail north to connect the Homolobi ruins with those of the Hopi reservation. We have good evidences from historical and legendary sources that there were inhabited pueblos between Zuni and Awatobi as late as the middle of the seventeenth century. One of these, that of the Cipias (Tcipiya, according to the Hopis), is distinctly mentioned as west and south of Zuni. It is not probable that all clans of the Patki people had wholly deserted Homolobi in the sixteenth century, and they may have been dwelling there as late as 1700. It is as yet an unanswered question whether any one of the ruins which were exea- vated in 1896 is Tcipiya, which, according to the Hopis, the Zunis declare was midway between Awatobi and Zuni. THE HOMOLOBI GROUP Location There are four ruins near Winslow, which may be called the Homo- lobi group and are provisionally numbered 1, 2, 3, and 4. Of these, ruin 1, true Homolobi, yielded the best archeological results, and was nearest to the town, being about 5 miles away. More excavations were attempted at that place than at all the others. The ruin num- bered 2 is about three miles farther down the river and more distant 24 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 from it, but is on the same side. Ruin 3 lies on the left bank of the ~ river, about midway between the first and second, and ruin 4 is a few miles beyond on the same side, somewhat removed from the river. All of these ruins are thus within a radius of 6 miles of the town of Winslow. FORMER INHABITANTS Several Hopi clans, belonging to groups called the Water-house, the Squash, and the Rabbit, are said to have lived in these settlements along the Little Colorado, near Winslow. Among the clans of the first-named group may be mentioned the Corn, Agave, Rain-cloud, Lightning, and various others whose totems are aquatic animals. A list of them follows: Patki Water-house Kaii Corn Omauwt Rain-cloud Tanaka Rainbow Talawipiki Lightning Kwan Agave Sivwapi Bigelovia graveolens Pawik Aquatic animals (Duck) Pakwa Frog Pavatiya Small aquatic animals, Tadpole (pakwa, frog; tiyo, young) The prominent chiefs of Walpi who belong to the Patki or Water- house people are Supela, Kwatcakwa, Sikwistiwa, and Kwaa. Ana- wita of Sichumovi is also a member of the family. The legends of Homolobi were told to the author by the last mentioned, but Supela and the others have much lore concerning this group of ruins which has never been published. The Patun or Squash people, now extinct on the East mesa, are also said to have lived at Homolobi, and they are reputed to have settled at Teukubi on the Middle mesa, and the Tawa or Sun people, who are associated with the Pakab or Reed clans, once lived with the Rain-cloud and Squash people in the Homolobi settlements. There is evidence from the present Hopi ritual that the Patki, Patun, Tawa, and Piba (Rabbit) families, among others, lived at Homolobi. [For instance, it is stated that the following clans intro- duced the societies and ceremonies mentioned, with their fetishes, into the modern system: Clans Ceremonies Societies Pate ren : {Soyaluna _- \. Pe re he eee \Paliilikonti Lalakonta Piba_- o18 come e coe tees See NCW hres: 3 at eee Tataukyama Patuis 222 222 See eee INewfire=- 2: 255.2 Wiiwiitcimta This statement is supported by the facts that the chief of the Kwa- kwantu, the great warrior society,” is Anawita, and that Supela is one «aKwahu, eagle; kwan, agave. FEWKES] RUIN 1 OF THE HOMOLOBI GROUP 25 of the chiefs in Soyaluna. The Sun priest, Kwateakwa, takes a prominent part in the screen drama of Paliilikonti. The Kwakwantu, Eagle-agave people, are distinctly southern, coming from the region in Arizona where the great cactus or agave grows, and an examination of details of the ceremonies mentioned shows an instructive likeness to Mexican rituals. In both Soyaluna“” and Paliiltikonti the effigies of the Plumed Snake play important parts, and this conception is dis- tinctly a Mexican one, recalling Quetzaleoatl. It is for those cere- monials in which there is the closest likeness to Nahuatl rites that southern origin is claimed by the chiefs and other participators. Ruin 1 As has been stated, the nearest of the Homolobi ruins to Winslow— the one which was chosen for extensive excavations—is about 3 miles distant on the right bank of the river, and about the same distance from where the river is bridged by the Atlantic and Pacific Railroad. At that point there are several small knolls separated by level spaces which might once have been cultivated fields. Between the site of the ruin and the river bank there is a small grove of cottonwood trees, the bases of which are evidently at times flooded by the overflow of the stream. The river takes a general northwest course from the railroad cross- ing, and is bordered with cottonwoods. On either side the banks are low and sandy, frequently caving in, rendering it treacherous to approach at certain seasons of the year. The neighboring plains are parched and dry in the spring and early summer, and violent sandstorms sweep over them, oftentimes so dense as to obscure all outlook. At these times work along archeological lines is very disagreeable, and life in the village is far from pleasant. When approached from Winslow the ruin is indicated by a number of low mounds without standing walls, and when it was first visited there was little to indicate that it was the site of a former pueblo, save many fragments of pottery strewn over the surface. The indications that Homolobi would be a profitable field for archeological investiga- tion were very small. The excavation of ruin 1 of the Homolobi group began about the first day of June, when a force of 5 Mexicans was employed to open the mounds at the northeast angle. The results of the work were not very satisfactory. They betrayed the fact that Homolobi was a pueblo of small size and of irregularly rectangular shape, with its highest walls on the northeast side. Considerable broken pottery, some stone implements, and other objects were obtained, but all the evidences appeared to indicate that the more valuable specimens were removed when the pueblo was abandoned. aAn illustrated account of this winter solstice ceremony may be found in the American Anthropologist, v.11, March and April, 1898. 26 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH, ANN. 22 The workmen penetrated to the lower floor, and found that the pueblo was two stories high at this point. The rooms were large and the beams of the fluoring were well preserved. The floors of the rooms were large, flat stones; the lower chambers were nicely paved. The walls were made of stone masonry, nicely plastered, and in some instances blackened by smoke. In one of the largest of these rooms the floor stones were in two cases found to be perforated by round holes about the size of a sipapu in modern kivas. These slabs are in many respects similar to those found in graves outside the walls of the pueblo. Two human skulls, one of which indicated an old person, and several human bones were found on the floor of chambers in the northeast part or the ruin, and were supposed to represent intramural 2 << OES Fig. 2. Ruin 1, Homolobi. burials. No pottery, however, was found in the vicinity of these skeletons, which fact would seem to indicate that they were not buried with customary mortuary offerings. Continued work on the side of the ruin toward the river revealed the fact that this part had been worn away by the overflow of the stream, and a section had been cut through it in digging an irrigating ditch which formerly supplied the plains around Sunset with water. The osteological collection from Homolobi was very large. Early in his excavations the author was surprised at the number of animal bones which were thrown out by the workmen, especially after they had penetrated to some distance below the surface. There appears no better explanation for the existence of these bones than that they were remains of animals domesticated or used as food. These bones were carefully gathered, and have been identified by Mr F. A. Lucas, of the National Museum; a complete list of species found at Homolobi is published in this report, page 110. FEWKES] SKULL OF DOMESTICATED DOG 27 The occurrence of a skull of the domesticated dog in one of the graves at the Chaves pass ruin is significant, showing that this ani- mal was known to the ancients, and probably utilized by them. The fact that this dog was the broad-faced variety is particularly instrue- tive. It was not apparently a domesticated coyote or a mongrel like those which now are so common in some of the pueblos. Mr Lucas has published the following account” of this specimen: Among the many objects obtained by Dr Fewkes last summer from the ruined pueblo of Chaves pass, Arizona, is the cranium of a domesticated dog found in a grave with a human skeleton. Although the mere fact of a dog being discovered under such circumstances is in itself interesting, it is not at first sight remarkable, since it is well known that in America, as elsewhere, the dog was domesticated at an early date, and Clavijero mentions an ancient dog, which he calls **a quadrnped of the country of Cibola, similar in form to a mastiff, which the Indians employ to carry burdens.’’ Aside from the fact that this is the first dog’s cranium dis- covered by Dr Fewkes, there are some points of special interest in the present case. Most of the Indian dogs are more or less wolfish in their aspect and have long skulls, with comparatively low foreheads, thus showing a small degree of specialization in the way of breed, and this is true of such of the mummied dogs of Egypt asI have seen. The cranium of the Chaves dog. on the contrary, is of the broad-faced type. with high forehead, and, curiously enough, is precisely simi- lar in size and proportions to the cranium of an Eskimo dog from Cumberland sound, the resemblance extending to the peculiar concavity and squareness of the nasal region. While this is an interesting coincidence, it is not brought forward as implying community of origin, but as instancing long domestication in order that so well-marked a breed could be established. A curious confirmation of the early origin of this breed was received from San Marcos, Texas, where, in excavating for ponds at the station of the United States Fish Commission, a human skeleton and bones of other animals were found in a layer containing many flint imple- ments, overlaid by two feet of black soil. The bones were those of existing species, including teeth of several bison, and there was also a fragment of a dog’s skull similar in size and proportions to that obtained at Chaves pass. Owing to the circumstances under which the bones were exhumed, it is not known whether or not the dog and man were found together. While none of the bones were min- eralized, the condition under which they were found and the character of the human cranium showed them to be of very considerable age. Dr Fewkes states that the skulls of carnivores are used in Hopi religious cere- monies, and that the skull, paws, etc., are regarded as powerful fetishes of war- riors and cherished by them with much care. It is customary to bury a priest's fetishes with him, and there is little doubt that the dog’s cranium from Chaves pass was a fetish of the man in whose grave it was found. As Dr Fewkes believes that the people of the Chaves pass ruin formerly lived far south, in contact with Nahuatl peoples, it can readily be seen how a dog’s skull came to be part of the ceremonial outfit of the priest in whose grave it was found. The numerous turkey bones which were found do not necessarily mean that this bird was used as food by the ancient sedentary peo- ples of Arizona. We are told by the historian of Coronado’s expedi- tion that the Pueblos had domesticated fowls, but these were probably turkeys from which, as at present, were obtained feathers used in a Science, n.s., v. 5, 1897, p. 544. 28 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 ceremonial practices. It would hardly seem possible that birds whose feathers were thus used would be eaten, although parallels to such a usage occur in the religious rites of many peoples. We know that their bones were made into needles and bodkins, and there is every probability that the wild turkey’s flesh was eaten.“ Because of the poor results of the early excavations at Homolobi the author determined to abandon the work at this ruin. A search for the burial places was not successful, although he carefully examined the sandy hillocks a few hundred feet away, expecting that they would be found there if anywhere. Meanwhile a half dozen Hopi Indians who had been sent for came to Winslow, and the author set them at work, having discharged the Mexicans. On the first day they discovered the cemeteries of Homolobi, after which it was only a question of time before a large collection was obtained.” The burial places at Homolobi were close to the outer wall of the pueblo, so near to it in fact that the skeletons in some instances touched the outer face of the wall. These places of burial were liter- ally ‘under the ladders” of the town, if we believe, as we legitimately may, that the inhabitants formerly mounted to the house tops by ladders. The outer slope of the mound was thus found to be crowded with the dead, and with them were multitudes of mortuary pottery offer- ings of all kinds. These cemeteries were found on the east? side, opposite the river bank, and although it is possible that in ancient times burials may have been made on the side of the mound toward the river, if they ever were there the overflow of the stream has washed them away or covered them up. The burial places were sometimes recognized by flat stones set on edge projecting above the surface of the soil. These stones had often fallen in over the grave, and were sometimes buried many feet below the surface. In many of these there was a small, round hole about the size of a broom handle; in others this hole was large and square. In one or two instances traces of pigment were detected on these burial stones, but in the majority the figures were not legible. The reason assigned by some of the Hopi workmen for these perfora- tions was for the escape of the soul; others regarded them as sym- bols of the sipapt, openings in the kiva floors which they closely resemble. In the pavement of one of the larger rooms which was exca- vated two slabs were found, one of which was perforated with a single «The eagles which are kept in the Moki towns to-day for the feathers used in ceremonies are buried at death in certain cemeteries with ceremonies of a simple character. >In the winter of 1897 Dr G. A. Dorsey, of the Field Columbian Museum, made some archeo- logical studies of Homolobi, and he informs the author that he found many interments with beautiful mortuary pottery not far from the trenches made in 1896. Others have dug many specimens from the same ruin. « While as a general thing the cemeteries to the east of a ruin are the largest, places of burial are not confined to that side of a ruin 5 FEWKES] RUINS OF HOMOLOBI GROUP : 29 hole, and the other, which was broken, had a hole in the middle and around notch on the broken edge, as though there had once been a perforation at that place. RUIN 2 Ruin 2¢ of the Homolobi group, unlike ruin 1, is situated on top of a hill with a wide outlook. This is a much larger ruin than 1, and the walls standing above ground are in a better state of preservation. No very extensive excavations were undertaken in this ruin, but a few graves were found some distance from the walls near the foot of the hill on which the pueblo was built. Several graves were indi- eated by upright slabs of stone set on edge in the soil, and from them a dozen or more mortuary vessels were excavated. The pottery was like that of ruin 1 in general character, yellow and brown ware pre- dominating. : From the great size of this ruin the author suspects that if it were earefully excavated a rich collection might be found, but work upon it would be difficult, as it is situated quite a distance from water, and there are other practical difficulties, some of which, however, might be easily overcome. A number of bowls were found on the sides of the mesa on which this ruin stands, but these appear to indicate isolated burials; the cemetery was not discovered, and consequently the number of mor- tuary objects from the ruin was small. RvIN 3 Ruin 3 of the Homolobi group is very small, and is situated so near the present bed of the river that a portion of it has been worn away by the water. One of the most interesting features of this ruin is the use of blocks of adobe instead of stone in some of the partitions of the rooms. The situation of this ancient dwelling was such that stone was not easily obtained, and consequently, as so often happens elsewhere in the Southwest, adobe was utilized as a building material. Farther down the Little Colorado the author found in the ruins on the plains which border the river indications that the ancient houses were made of adobe alone, a fact readily explained by the absence of suitable stone on the site of the habitations. No other ancient Tusayan pueblo where adobe was used for the construction of houses is known, and for the most part to-day the building material is rock from the formation most convenient to the pueblo.’ e This ruin, like ruin 1, was called Homolobi, and it is probable that the name is applied at the present time to the whole cluster of ruins near Winslow. As different phratries are reputed to have lived in this neighborhood, it may be possible to connect the several ruins with indi- vidual families. >There are adobe walls built out from the old mission at Awatobi. 30 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS (ETH. ANN, 22 Very little in the line of exploration of ruin 3 was attempted, as only a single visit was made to it. The pottery fragments were identical in character with those from the other Homolobi ruins, and the size of the mound shows that it was a small settlement. The stream has encroached on the foundations of the ancient town to such an extent that the cemeteries on this side have been obliterated. The sur- rounding plain was evidently cultivated, for remnants of old ditches can be seen in the neighborhood, though they were difficult to trace on account of frequent changes in the neighboring stream. One of the most interesting and exceptional objects taken from this ruin was a bone implement apparently made from the leg bone of an antelope. The blunt end of this object was carved in imitation of an animal, possibly a bear, the head, body, and legs being well represented. Ruri 4 Ruin 4 of the Homolobi group is one of the most picturesque in this region, and has many resemblances to Shipaulovi, on the Middle mesa of Tusayan. It resembles a castle perched on the pinnacle of a butte, which is steep on all sides. Its height is possibly 100 feet from the plain, and it has a wide outlook across the valley of the Little Colorado. The top of the mesa is small and appears to have been covered with house walls built of stone, fragments of which have fallen down the steep sides of the mesa. The general ground plan is roughly rectangular, apparently with a central court, and the indications are that the houses were not more than one or two stories high. The débris at the base of the cliffs is full of fragments of pottery resembling that of ruin 1, and here undoubtedly we must look for the cemeteries, as there is no sign of a burial place on the top of the mesa. Near the foot of the mesa, and half way up its sides, border- ing the rough trail by which one can now ascend to the former site of the pueblo, there are many large bowlders, most of which are covered with pictographs pecked in the surface of the rock. These picto- graphs closely resemble those found almost universally in the western section of the pueblo area, and bear every evidence of being very ancient. Many of them were almost illegible, possibly from age, while others were fresh, suggesting more recent work. There are no painted pictographs, suggestive of the Apaches or other Indian tribes. No excavations were attempted at ruin 4, and the author’s visit there was a short one. Although the ruin is not quite as large as ruin 1, the abundance of pottery fragments gave promise that it would be a fruitful field for archeological studies. THE CHEVLON RUIN (CAKWABATY AKI) Cheylon creek is a small stream of water which empties into the Little Colorado from its left bank about opposite the station called Hardy, on the Atlantie and Pacific railroad. It is possibly 15 miles FEWKES] THE CHEVLON RUIN 31 east of Winslow, with which it communicates by a tolerably good wagon road. About 2 miles south of Hardy, near the Esperanza ranch, the creek makes a graceful curve, west of which there rises a low mound—the site of Cakwabaiyaki or Blue Running Water pueblo. The country at this point is barren and sandy, with gravelly hills, and with rock jutting above itssurface. There are no trees and only a few scrubby bushes of characteristic Arizona vegetation. The banks of Cheylon creek at this point are low, and in places there are numerous sand dunes. There is always water in the bed of the stream, but in the dry season much of it is lost when it gets to the thirsty sands of the Little Colorado valley. It is not potable, however, and animals do not drink it eagerly. Fishes and turtles in considerable numbers inhabit this stream. The road from Winslow to the Cheylon ruin crosses the railroad in the suburbs of the town, following the plain to Salt slough, a putrid water hole, by whose alkaline waters many animals have been poisoned. From there the road leads to Clear creek, a beautiful stream which has been dammed to supply water for the town. The author will consider this architectural likeness of the ground rooms of the ancient ruins to old Hopi houses in his final article on the Black falls ruins, where plans will be given illustrating the relation of the ground-floor rooms with lateral doors to the old rooms on the East mesa. The ruins near Black falls have their ground-floor rooms like the old rooms of the Hopi pueblos. 42 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 In many of the ruins there are found at the base of the mesa on the south and east sides rooms of a single story which, from their position, we may designate basal rooms. They are now covered with débris, but were once protected by the overhanging edge of the mesa, suggesting cliff houses, of which they may be a survival. These basal structures may have been used as granaries, but in none of them were remains of roofs found. With the exception of ruin A, group B, most of the ruins show Little evidence of long occupancy; few logs or beams remain in them, there are no extensive deposits of débris, and there is a lack of large quan- tities of pottery fragments such as are usually found about pueblos which have been occupied for many generations. The general indi- cation is that these buildings were inhabited in comparatively modern times. None of the rooms show marks of surface plastering, except those of group B, where it is confined to the interior of the walls, as is the case with the older Hopi buildings. The size of the rooms is much greater than is common in very ancient ruins. No kivas are found, and it is believed that the religious ceremonies were held in the ordinary domiciles. No build- ing had a roof intact, but in many instances the remains of the roofs and floors of the upper rooms were found in the chambers below. The fact that wooden beams occur so abundantly in ruin A, group B, implies that it was either the last pueblo to be abandoned in this neighborhood or that the beams were taken from the others to it, and when it was deserted its inhabitants moved too far away to carry heavy objects with them. Some of the timbers in the modern Hopi houses are said to have been dragged from the Little Colorado, possibly from old ruins. Group A Group A includes a cluster of ruins which as a rule are small and have a general similarity in construction. It is situated about 15 miles west of Little Colorado river. Following the road from Flagstaff to Tuba to within about 11 miles of Tanner’s crossing, after passing Deadman’s flat the visitor turns to the right, and, proceeding 4 miles eastward, finds himself in the midst of the group. There are no trails or wagon tracks from the well-traveled Tuba road to group A, but the country is so level that one can readily go overland to almost any point. A castellated, truncated lava cone, the ‘‘ Citadel” of the group, can be seen soon after one leaves the Tuba road, and this prominent landmark gives the general direction of the ruins among which it is situated. From the top of this citadel all the ruins of group A, with one or two exceptions, are visible, and the visitor is advised to inspect it first in order to determine the position of the surrounding ruins (see plate V11). ~~ EE a i i i FEWKES] GROUP A OF BLACK FALLS RUINS 43 THE CITADEL The walls of the Citadel (figure 4) are constructed of blocks of lava and sandstone, and cover the top of a truncated elevation. They are arranged about a level central court or plaza, the surrounding walls of which are best preserved on the western side. The hill on which the citadel is built bears evidence of having once been a volcanic cone, and was an advantageous place of refuge for the inhabitants of the neighboring houses, as it had a commanding position, was difficult of access, and was well fortified. As some of the structures were of two stories, they appear to have been permanently inhabited. Fig. 4. The Citadel, group A. Twenty-three small ruins were counted from this elevated position (see plate v1). For convenience of description these may be desig- nated A, B, C, ete. RUIN A Ruin A of group A is situated at the base of the truncated mesa of the Citadel. It is built of red sandstone, with a few courses of lava blocks, is 50 feet long by 12 feet wide, and contains five rooms arranged side by side. Although the house was evidently never more than one story high, the many fallen building stones would seem to indicate that its walls were once considerably higher than at present. Few floor beams or rafters were detected. 44 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS (ETH. ANN. 22 Near this ruin, at the base of the hill, are four walled inclosures, one above another, suggesting terraced gardens. Their low walls are composed of alternate rows of lava and sandstone. Near these former gardens is a depression which may once have been a reservoir. This ruin is the only one visited which was not built on an elevated mes at or near the edge of a canyon. RUINS B, C, AND D There are remains of three houses, built of lava and sandstone blocks, on a small lava hill a few hundred feet north of the Citadel. On the same elevation there is a circular wall which may have served as a fortification. Most of the walls of the ruins have fallen, and it is almost impossible to determine the relationship of the former rooms. There are also some small ruins on a lava hill near the elevation on which B, C, and D are situated. RUINS E AND F A considerable distance from the last-mentioned cluster, but in the same direction from the Citadel, there are situated two conspicuous ruins visible from a considerable distance. One of these, on the top of a lava mesa, is built of the same material of which the mesa is composed; the other, situated at its base, is constructed of red sand- stone. Near the latter, on a lava mesa, there are many pictographs, representing spirals, frogs, snakes, and unknown figures. There is much broken pottery near ruin F. RUINS G, H, I, AND J These ruins, especially G, H, and J (plates VIII-x1), are constructed of limestone, and are situated on the brink of a canyon, at the bottom of which, near ruin G, are mounds indicating the site of 1. The walls of G, H, and J are well preserved, and show some of the best aboriginal masonry in Arizona. Ruin G (plate vir) had two rooms with walls rising 20 feet from the rim of the canyon. The lower courses of the walls are much larger than the upper, as is true of others in this neighborhood. The level of the floors is indicated by courses of larger stones. Ruin J (plates x, X1, figure 5) is the best preserved of all the ruins in group A, and presents exceptional features. It is situated on the left wall of a canyon which is about 40 feet deep and equally wide. It deepens and widens east of the ruin, and then narrows, forming a natural corral inclosed by cliffs. Eight good rooms were noted in that part of the ruin situated on the top of the canyon wall, and in the canyon below it there were several semicircular basal rooms, some of which were sheltered by an overhanging cliff. Similarly sheltered rooms are found in many of the ruins in this neighborhood, but nowhere else are they so well preserved. There are no beams in FEWKES] GROUP A OF BLACK FALLS RUINS 45 place, but their former positions are shown in many walls by openings, indicating that when inhabited the pueblo had _ two, possibly three, stories. An inclosure which may have been a ninth room is so filled with fallen walls that the details of its construction or size could not be determined. As none of the rooms haye external lateral openings on a level with the foundations, it is naturally supposed that all were entered by means of ladders and hatchways. There are a modern doorway and fireplace in one room, evidently of later construction than the walls. Perhaps the most problematic structures in this ruin are the small cysts in the canyon walls east of the entrance. A thin layer of softer rock has so weathered as to leave a horizontal crevice which at intervals is divided by stones set on edge into receptacles a foot or so deep. They were formerly closed by flat slabs of stone, only two of which now remain in place. These cysts were nicely plastered, and the slabs which closed them were luted in place with adobe. Nothing was found in them to indicate their use, whether as burial CAanron? BASAL OOMF = aN Subhas SS ee if ZL —, “writ ania: vgs a, . \ Ss > jj, 2 Ry? I MAS CT ite “youn SOM athtety, NN, Ul, | ONE wv 9 NSS Fig. 5. Plan of ruin J, group 4. places for the dead or as bins for the storage of corn. Their number was considerable, but they were so small that their capacity could scarcely have been more than a few bushels. This is the only ruin in which such inclosures were found, and no theory is advanced as to their former use. RUIN K Ruin kK, which evidently formerly contained several rooms, is divided into two sections and is situated on a high lava mesa difficult of approach. The walls of the larger section inclose three well-preserved rooms, and still rise to a height of about.8 feet. Five feet above the base the red sandstone blocks of which the walls are built are replaced by a course of stone of lighter color, which forms a horizon- tal band around the ruin. The second section consists of a low, rough wall built along the edge of the cliff, inclosing a level space in ‘ 46 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS (ETH. ANN, 22 front of the first section. There are isolated rooms in this inclosure, and a depression which may have been a reservoir. This ruin, like many Others, consisted of dwellings and a fort for protection. There are instructive pictographs on the rocks near by. RUIN L At the base of the mesa on which the last-mentioned ruin stands is a ruin of red sandstone with five rooms and a foundation of unusual shape. A huge rock, cubical in form, has fallen a few yards from its former position in the bluff. Ruin 1 is built on the top of this detached block, and its fairly well preserved walls are separated Fic. 6. Section A, ruin A, group B. from the bluff on all sides by a wide crevice. From a distance the ruin appears to be perched on the bluff, but closer observation shows its separation from the latter by an impassable natural moat. RUIN M This is an oblong ruin rising from the side of a deep, narrow canyon, with walls consisting of alternating courses of large and small blocks of red sandstone. Some of the walls have fallen, but sections fully 10 feet high still remain in place. There are evidences of five rooms, each two stories high, but most of the chambers are a FEWKES] BLACK FALLS RUINS 47 filled with fallen stones. The cemetery of this pueblo lies west of the ruin, where there are also remains of walls. Small ruins may be seen near the road from group A to group B, a few miles to the left. Their walls are in good condition, but no peculiar features were observed. Group B RUIN A The largest of all the ruins in the Black falls cluster, and one which bears evidence of having been inhabited for a considerable time, lies about 35 miles northeast of Flagstaff and about 8 miles from the Little Colorado. This structure is built on a ridge of sandstone extending in a northeast-southwest direction, and consists of two large buildings of moderate elevation (plates X1I-XxvVI, figure 6). On each side the ridge slopes gradually to a depression, the talus on the Fic. 7. Plan of section a, ruin a, group B. east covering a series of rooms, while on the west side, where the slope is more abrupt, no rooms were discovered. The ruin is divided into two sections connected by rows of one-story rooms, the walls of which have fallen. Remains of a great number of roof and floor beams are still scattered throughout the débris. These beams are larger than those in any other ruin of the same size known to the author. It is difficult to determine the original number of rooms in the first section of this ruin, as the tops of the walls have fallen, filling the chambers with débris. How many basal rooms were buried in the talus of fallen walls at the base of the mesa on the eastern side could not be discovered. Room A of this section (see figure 7) is elevated on a rocky base about 10 feet high. The chamber is small, and its walls have fallen on two sides. The débris has been cleared out of this room by Mr Doney, who found in it the desiccated remains of an infant wrapped in four well-preserved cotton blankets. 48 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN, 22 Room B is a small, narrow chamber with good walls on three sides, but the fourth wall, which was situated on the edge of the mesa, has fallen over the brink. The ground-floor chamber of room C is formed by a gap in the mesa, from which a large cubical block has fallen. The walls of this eham- ber are the natural rock, to the surface of which adhere fragments of plastering. The beams of the floor of an upper room still rest on the edge of the gap, as in some of the kivas of Walpi to-day, especially those on the eastern edge of the mesa. These are built in a depres- sion, the solid rock forming the walls on three sides, the fourth wall being of masonry. Room D is buried under débris, and the broken beams, which have pressed down on a plastered banquette, are still visible. The reeds, straw, and impressed clay which once formed a floor may be seen in section. f arth a lee “om tata OWI, Wty ernie wage eins Wir roy, (SRL VES - 7, eee ¢ : - 8 | fa) 3} PASPALBT ART Bee N05 0 AMZ hie wn nim int win: biel ein nalni'mvlela'w' aisiele ieqc)efetey er eleens a ann, ; ns WUT STN RT ! CCAS Tt TENG torr wren SOS me BAe NW ws Fig. 8. Plan of section B, ruin A, group B. Room E has two stories, and the floor beams and rafters are still in place but buried under débris. A high wall’extends from the east- ern wall of room E, crossing a depression in the cliff, which is bridged by logs serving as its foundation. It seems within the bounds of probability that there were 50 rooms in the first section of ruin A, group B, including the basal rooms now deep beneath the fallen walls of the higher portion of the ruin. On the supposition that half of these were uninhabited, and that there were four persons to each room in the remainder, the first section of the ruin would have housed a population of 60. This, however, on the basis of the present population of Walpi, as compared with the number of rooms in the pueblo, is a rather low estimate. Considering the population of the second section as about the same as that of the first section, and that of the connecting rooms as about 30, the approxi- mate population of the pueblos would have been 150. Estimated on the basis of that of Walpi, the population would be 200. FEWKES] GROUP B OF THE BLACK FALLS RUINS 49 The rooms of the second section (figure 8), several of which are well preserved, are lower than those of the first section, and the detritus has covered the base so completely that the mesa is inconspicuous. Room A (plate XIV) is nearly square and is built on two rectangular rocks, the top of which forms the floor. One of these rocks forms a side of the lower story of the adjoining room 8, which is in the best condition of any in this section. The walls of this room are well preserved, and it was oceupied as a habitation by a herder a few winters ago. There is a lateral doorway through the wall on one side, and in one corner is a fireplace communicating with a chimney, which will later be deseribed. This room is 12 feet 4 inches long by 9 feet 7 inches wide. In the second section many walls are still standing high above their foundations, indicating rooms now filled with fallen débris, in which beams, fragments of pottery, and other objects may be seen. Ten large rooms were counted, several of which had two stories. As has been stated, there were apparently basal rooms on the eastern side. The entire section is about 60 feet long. A chimney-like structure (plate XV) is one of the most conspicuous objects in this part of the ruin. It rises from the mass of débris covering room E and communicates with the fireplace in room B, but a vertical line from its top is 7 feet 10 inches from the nearest wall of the room in which the fireplace is situated. Whether this chimney is aboriginal or not, or whether it is a chimney atall, are open questions. Excepting its state of preservation and fine masonry, no evidence was found that it is of more recent date than the walls of the rooms. If it is an aboriginal chimney, which is doubtful, its structure is unique. It may be a ventilator, comparable with the chimney-like structures deseribed by Mindeleff in the kivas of Canyon de Chelly. One of the finest reservoirs (plate XVI a) which the author has seen in connection with a ruin was discovered near the bottom of the ele- vation on which ruin A of group B is situated. This reservoir is cir- cular in shape, 50 feet in diameter, and carefully walled. It lies south of the second section of the group, and apparently had a break in the wall in line with the depression east of the ruin. It appears to belong to the same type as those reservoirs on the East mesa of the Hopis in which snow and rain are collected for future use. There are instructive petroglyphs near ruin A, group B. A number of rock etchings observed in a small canyon about a mile from the ruin were pecked in a perpendicular wall, protected by the overhanging rim of the canyon. These petroglyphs were evidently made by the former inhabitants of this region, as one of the best examples shows the same design as that figured on pottery from the neighboring ruin. There were likewise butterfly, sheep or antelope, and other figures. It would be quite impossible in this preliminary notice to give a complete account of the archeologic objects which Mr Doney has taken from this ruin, but even a preliminary sketch would be incom- 22: ETH—04——4 50 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN, 22 plete without some reference to them. One of the most important objects is the desiccated body of an infant wrapped in coarse cotton cloth, allusion to which has already been made. This bundle was inclosed in three small cotton kilts which were later washed and found to be ‘‘as good as new.” At the foot of the infant was a desie- cated parrot (?), some of the brilliant plumage of which is still to be seen. This bird has a prayer stick tied to one leg, which makes reasonable the belief that if wassa ceremonial object. Another inter- esting specimen in the Doney collection is the dried body of a dog, which was found in one of the deep clefts in the rock near one of the ruins. This dog has a head similar to that. found by the writer in the Chaves pass ruin. There are also several fragments of beauti- ful cotton cloth and netting. Some of the specimens are embroidered, others are painted with circles and other geometric designs. A heavy wooden club, several planting sticks, and other wooden objects are to be seen in Mr Doney’s collection. There are also many cigarette canes, some with woven handles, as well as seeds of cotton, squash, gourd, and corn, and many objects of shell, as tinklers, ornaments, rings, and bracelets. One of the best Haliotis shells the author has ever seen from a ruin was found in one of the graves. There are also many large turquoise ornaments, some an inch or an inch and a half square. The many metates are made of lava, and are deeply worn, as if from long use. A copper bell from a grave near ruin Ais a remarkable specimen. It has the same form as the bells from Arizona ruins, which the author has elsewhere deseribed, but on one side are ridges indicating eyes, nose, and mouth, apparently made of strips of metal soldered or brazed to the surface. It is not believed that this bell was the product of the former occupants of these now ruined structures; more probably it was obtained by them through barter. RUIN B Across the depression north of ruin A, beyond the reservoir and on top of a mesa, there is a rectangular ruin consisting of two sections connected by low, parallel walls, which inclose a rectangular plaza. It appears that each section was composed of two single-story rooms. No beams or other evidences of roofing are now visible, but a consider- able quantity of masonry has fallen into the inclosures. From the base of the mesa to the ruin an old trail can be traced by rows of stones on the eastern side, and on the same side there are likewise remnants of rooms. Graves were found among the rocks at the base of the mesa. RUIN C About half a mile north of ruin A of group B there is a fortified mesa with several rooms, some of which had two stories. The surface of this mesa is flat, the rim is round, the sides are perpendicular, but FEWKES] BLACK FALLS RUINS ult of moderate elevation. Most of the walls built on the rim, continuous with the mesa sides, have fallen, but sections of the houses 10 feet high still remain, and the roof beams and wattling may be seen in place in one or two rooms. There are some fragments of broken metates made of lava, many potsherds, and a considerable pile of débris at the base of the mesa. Ruin A can be seen from the highest point, and the distant ruin A of group C is plainly visible. The cemetery is on the east side, among the rocks at the base of the mesa. Fic. 9. Ruin A, group c, from the south. Group C RUIN A This ruin, which lies 40 miles by road from Flagstaff and 5 miles due west of Black falls, is one of the most impressive masses of abo- riginal masonry in this section (plates XVII-XxIrx, figure 9). It is visible for many miles, and from a distance resembles an old castle as it looms from the north end of an isolated, oblong, red-sandstone mesa rising 15 feet above the plain. The south end of the mesa is higher than the north extremity, and on its rim appears to have been built a low wall inclosing a plaza. Standing walls cover about one- half the surface of the mesa. On its east side, about midway of its 52 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS (ETH. ANN, 22 length, there is a gap with perpendicular walls extending about 14 feet into the side and almost bisecting it. The following measurements of ruin A, group C, were made by Mr Jack, who has kindly placed them at the author’s disposal: The longer axis of the mesa bears north 10° east (the bearing was obtained by using the face of the eastern wall of the highest building). The width of the mesa at the middle point, measured from the rim of the overhanging cliffs, is about 65 feet. The height of the tallest wall of room A is 19 feet above its foundation, on top of the mesa, which is about ‘15 feet high. The inside measurements of the same room are: Top of mesa to probable position of first floor, 7 feet 6 inches; first floor to probable position of second floor, 8 feet; bench on which the floor beams of the second floor rest to the top of the uly M, yg Plies Minn, ia shui tio aanitinnnnt i, % NSS Ho tmayrsayshorunrnfUbAON\ QT NOM chainnditcrna RAT IS CES 2 : PSSED can Pesce yyy SEY On) VA = = inc ey ES ¥ Ws ws torr &% we WAYNE CASAL AGOMS FiG.10. Plan of ruin A, group c. wall, 5 feet. It may reasonably be concluded that the third story was as high as either of the other two, or about 7 feet 6 inches, which would make the original height of the wall about 23 feet. The inside horizontal measurements of the north and south walls of room A are not the same. The former is 11 feet 4 inches, the latter 9 feet 9 inches. The east and west walls are 12 feet long. Room c is 17 feet 9 inches long by 9 feet 7 inches wide. Although the standing walls of this ruin are the best preserved of any of those examined, no wooden beams were found in place, nor were there remants of the flooring or other débris in the rooms them- selves. This absence is explained by the supposition that at the time of the abandonment of the settlement, or later, the woodwork was earried away for use in new habitations. Possibly they were taken to FEWKES] GROUP C OF THE BLACK FALLS RUINS 53 ruin A of groupB. There is good evidence that this ruin once had large floor beams, as is indicated by openings in the walls in which they rested. Examination of the ground plan (figure 10) shows that the whole surface of the mesa was once covered with rooms, the walls of which still extend to its edge. The hignest walls, those which surrounded room A, are three stories. The two outside walls rise directly from the edge of the perpendicular cliff. There are several small openings at various levels, and holes in which rested the great beams that once supported the flooring are readily seen. At the corners of the rooms the masonry of the second story is bonded to that of the first and third, imparting solidity and strength to the high walls. There is no entrance or passageway between rooms A and C, but access was had to room A from room B. Room B is almost perfectly inclosed by standing walls, formerly two stories high. The wallon the north side has been overturned, and the many stones which have fallen at the base make an entrance at this point possible. As is shown by the depressions in the walls, this structure once had two large beams in the roof of the first story, but* they have disappeared. Room Cc has one story; its walls are complete on all sides, and there is an interior entrance into room D, and an exterior passageway. Rooms A, B, and CG are conspicuous from a distance and form the greater part of the ruin. At intervals on the rim of the mesa other walls are found, some sec- tions of which are 4 or 5 feet high. It is difficult to trace the walls of the rooms designated D and E. This ruin also has cave rooms at the south base of the mesa, which recall those of the other ruins in the Black falls cluster. Plate XVII shows ruin A, group C, from the east. The tall, square tower on the left of the plate incloses room A, and the lower wall extending to the gap is the side of room c. The fragments of masonry on the right of the gap are all that remain of the walls of room E. The mounds on the mesa to the right of the last are remnants of an encireling wall and of rooms which once surrounded the open space on the end of the mesa. On this side of the mesa the upper part overhangs the lower, forming a cave, but no indication of rooms was detected here. The wall on the edge of the mesa which shows at the left of plate XVHI is a part of room D, and at the bottom of the cliff at this point can be seen the walls of the basal rooms built at right angles to the cliffs. These are also shown in plate XIX. The cemetery is about 100 yards east of the ruin and is small in extent. The mortuary objects found in a single grave opened will give an idea of the burial deposits. The graves are oval, and consist of eysts made of slabs of stone set on end and covered with other flat stones. The upright stones were cemented together with adobe, the covering slabs being apparently luted to the edges of the uprights. These burial cysts were commodious, and in the one uncovered the 54 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN, 22 body, which was that of a woman, lay on one side, at full length, with the head at the wider end. To the right of the hips were found a decorated food bowl in which was a smaller bowl, a large and beauti- fully decorated vase, and a second small food bowl. On the left arm was an armlet made of a Pectunculus shell identical with those found inthe ruins of Homolobi. On the breast there was a remnant of a wooden prayer stick painted green. Near the mastoid processes were square ear pendants made of lignite covered with a turquoise mosaic surrounding a central red stone. These are beautiful speci- mens of turquoise mosaic, far superior to those now in use in the Hopi pueblos. The skeleton was in a very poor state of preservation, probably because of the character of the soil, which is a cinder sand through which water readily percolates. There is a general similarity in the texture and decoration of the four pieces of pottery found in this grave. They belong to the black-and-white variety and have geometrical ornamentation. Wn Usha LEY nace ELE EETE 4 % cp wnant AL bin y hilton dt WS SS S Dep uprsin 20 eae SSESA < S GQ6'6€ uy wn eee WS CLUES = Trt S ~ ashe a a \\, = TEN Sey SSSSSS'8 Gp Gy S UY WS RS \\t Wf Ril Way . ij Vy Sy Wn pi iY Mh SU TTL in) SS \ | ' Xi, fe {9 "Win, SS n S Trig lle 6 > BASAL 00M ” Ne? ‘7 mi Vy Ss / Wy, \ | 1OFT “tery, ww Fic. 11. Plan of ruin p, group c. RUIN B About 2 miles from the large ruin just described, to the left of the road to Schiiltze’s spring, is a small red-sandstone ruin standing on an isolated bluff. This ruin covers the top of the mesa, and is conspicuous for some distance. The rim of the mesa overhangs in places, as the lower strata are much eroded, and the ruin can be entered at only one point. All the rooms of this ruin are single storied, and most of the walls are high, though there is a consider- able quantity of fallen stone in the rooms and at the base of the mesa. Room A (see figure 11) is a semicircular inclosure most of the walls of which have fallen. It is perched over a projecting table or plat- form, the rim of which the wall covers. The ground plan of room B is nearly square; the walls are well preserved and rise directly from the edge of the mesa, which is steep on three sides. The interval between rooms B and D is strewn with stones, but traces of low walls can be seen. One of these walls is on the edge of the steep mesa; the — FEWKES] BURRO SPRING RUIN 55) other, parallel with it, almost divides the space in halves. This is the part of the ruin which one enters first after climbing up the talus of fallen rocks. Room D is large, with well-preserved walls 4 or 5 feet high, and with a projecting platform on one side, on which only obseure indications of artificial structures may be detected. Room F is rather small, with walls built over a projecting platform, resembling from below a bow window. Room E is well constructed; it contains considerable débris, and its sides are continuous with the perpendicular wall of the mesa. At the base of the cliff, just below room E, there is a low, almost circular wall, forming an inclosure somewhat similar to the basal rooms of some of the ruins already described. Although in general its architecture does not differ from that of many other rectangular ruins previously discussed, the over- hanging platform gives a unique appearance to the structure. About 300 feet eastward were noted the edges of flat stones which indicate burial cysts. The whole length of this ruin is 46 feet, and the width, including the projections at F and G, 21 feet. The sizes of different rooms measured were: Room B, 10 feet 8 inches by 9 feet 10 inches. Room p, 15 feet 4 inches by 10 feet 5 inches. Room £, 10 feet by 5 feet 10 inches. The following bearings were taken from this ruin: Group C, ruin A, bears north 12° east. Mount Agassiz bears south 48° west. Schiiltze’s spring bears south 50° west. RUINS NEAR HONANI’S HOUSE AT BURRO SPRING The Hopi Indian Honani declared that there was a large ruin on the mesa not far from his house at Burro spring. This ruin, how- ever, was not visited, as Honani was away when the author passed through that country. There is a legend that some of the clans of Shumopovi once lived at this point, which is apparently on the line of migration from the ruins on the Little Colorado to the Middle mesa of Tusayan.* Honani is a prominent man in Shumopovi, which fact may account for his occupation of land near the Burro spring. The preceding description will give a general idea of the ruins in this section. It is not possible to compare them with the ruins of Homolobi, where most of the walls have disappeared or have so fallen as to render the original plan unrecognizable. The difference in building material employed in the construction of the pueblos on Chevlon fork of Little Colorado river must have imparted a some- what different character to the buildings erected there, but there is «a The simple existence of a permanent spring of potable water in this part of Arizona may be taken as indicative of ruins in its immediate vicinity, and when such a spring lies on or near an old trail of migration, evidence of former settlements can not be difficult to find. Both Big Burro and Little Burro springs lie on the pathway of migrations of the southern Hopi clans in their journey from Homolobi, and were halting places for longer or shorter periods. 56 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 some likeness between the ruins at Chaves pass and the lava ruins near Black falls. In this connection it may be stated that there is also a large ruin near Homolobi built of lava blocks on a lava mesa. The racial and clan kinship of the former inhabitants of these pueb- los is somewhat problematic, but it is quite likely that the people were akin to the Hopis. This is shown not only by the character of the houses, but also by the pottery and various other objects found near them. Both legendary and archeological evidences point to the con- clusion that the people who once inhabited the pueblos near Black falls came from the north, and were related to those who onee lived in cliff houses and other habitations on the Rio Colorado and its tribu- tary, the San Juan. Hopi legends say that the Snake clans formerly lived at Tokonabi, on the Rio Colorado, and that they migrated south- ward and built a pueblo about 50 miles west of the present Topi towns, which they called Wukoki. This pueblo, it is said, still has high-standing walls. The direction and distance of the Black falls ruins from Walpi correspond pretty closely with those given in the legend, and while it may not be possible to identify any single ruin of this cluster as Wukoki, the traditional Wukoki of Hopi legend is not far from Black falls. The tradition that the inhabitants of these ruins came from the north is supported by the close resemblance in character and decoration between their pottery and that of the San Juan ruins. It might naturally be supposed that there would bea close likeness between the pottery of the Black falls ruins and that of Homolobi, and that kinship once existed between the inhabitants of these pueblos on the same river. Close study, however, shows marked differences, and the author is led to the belief that while both were pueblo people, and, therefore, similar in culture, the clans which inhabited Ilomolobi were not the same as those which lived in the Black falls villages. The clans which lived at Homolobi came from the far south, through Chaves pass, while those at Wukoki came from the opposite direction. Both evidently sought refuge in the IHlopi pueblos, where their descendants now live together. The clans from Homolobi were the Patki, Patun, and Tabo (Piba), whose route to the Hopi towns was by a trail which extends directly north past the ‘‘ Giant's chair.” The clans from Wukoki were the Teciia and others who migrated almost eastward when they sought their home in Tusayan. OBJECTS FROM THE LITTLE COLORADO RUINS POTTERY GENERAL FEATURES The mortuary pottery from the three ruins, Homolobi, Chevlon, and Chaves pass, is distinctive and typieal, with general resem- blances to that from other localities. As a rule it is more varied in character than that from the true Tusayan ruins, Shumopovi, Awatobi, FEWKES] POTTERY FROM THE LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 5G and Sikyatki, though its decoration has many likenesses to that on the pottery from these ruins. It has seemed best to discuss the ceramic ware of these three localities together, but in so doing it is thought necessary to mention the particular place from which each specimen was obtained.” It has been shown in an account of the pottery of Sikyatki, where conclusions were drawn from a large collection, that there was not a single piece of glazed pottery found in that ruin. At Awatobi few such fragments were found, but in the Homolobi and Cheylon ruins there were many glazed bowls, pots, and jars. The question whether the ancient Pueblos glazed their ware has been answered in both the affirmative and negative, and this differ- ence, no doubt, is due to the want of a good definition of the term glaze. Some of the bowls found at Homolobi and Chevlon have a black vitreous covering resisting a knife point, but which is not the gloss derived from polishing the vessel, but apparently from some salt used in the preparation of the black pigment with which the ware is painted. This glaze, however, has not been detected on any eolors but black and green, ot on any ware except the red, which is so abundant in both the ruins here described. It is hardly necessary to consider at any great length the various forms of ancient pottery obtained in 1896, for this would simply duplicate work already published in the author’s account of Sikyatki. Moreover, the question of variety of forms has already been amply discussed by others. The mode of manufacture, technic, coloration, and like questions were the first to attract attention of students, and, while by no means exhaustively presented, are treated more exten- sively than the character and meaning of the decoration. A few types present the various forms of pottery from the ancient ruins, and for a study of form alone the material in our museums is ample. With derivation of symbols, however, the problem is very different, for in a collection of thousands of specimens we rarely find two in which the ornamentation is the same. In a general way it may be said that certain decorative types are followed, but the variations are so many that in attempting to present an adequate idea of ancient ceramic ornamentation it is necessary to describe almost every speci- men. Manifestly that would be impossible, and as we need classifica- tion in this department of study, the following is proposed. a Unfortunately for close study of the lesson taught by Pueblo pottery regarding the migra- tion of the ancient people of Arizona, the ruin from which ancient Tusayan ware was collected is not mentioned in early writings on old Pueblo pottery. Thus, we find specimens from Awatobi, Canyon de Chelly, and Sikyatki given one locality, ‘‘Tusayan,’ and modern Tanoan pottery made at Hano by colonists from the Rio Grande bearing the same indefinite description. Almost all the modern pottery from ‘‘ Tusayan” in the National Museum is intrusive in that province, and is practically modified Tanoan. 58 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN, 22 CLASSIFICATION BY COLOR AND SURFACE FINISH The classification of pottery objects by color and surface finish leads us to refer them to the following groups: 1, Coarse unpolished ware, undecorated; 2, coarse unpolished ware, decorated; 3, polished ware, undecorated; and polished ware, decorated, which may be again divided into: 4, red and brown ware; 5, yellow ware; 6, black ware; 7, black and white ware; 8, red and black ware; 9, red, black, and white ware; 10, white and green ware. COARSE UNPOLISHED WARE Although a large collection of coarse ware was made in the excava- tions, the forms obtained varied little from those deseribed from Awatobi and Sikyatki. Of more than usual interest were specimens of coiled-ware bowls, the interiors of which were black and glazed. These are represented by several specimens from the Chaves pass ruins. There is but one specimen of rough ware the exterior of which was decorated (see figure 17). The rudeness of the design on this object is no doubt in part due to the character of the ware. As we go south the number of these specimens of rude coiled ware with external decoration increases. They are not found in ruins near the inhabited Hopi pueblos, are represented by a few specimens at Homo- lobi, increase in number at Chevlon, and are well represented in ruins on the northern foothills of the White mountains. UNDECORATED POLISHED WARE While in a few eases polished ware was undecorated, this was excep- tional, and only a few specimens were found, which all came from one excavation. In certain instances there was evidently formerly an ornamentation on some of these which had been obliterated; on others no sign of decoration could be discovered. The polished undecorated ware was ordinarily red, but there were likewise specimens of white and black undecorated ware. DECORATED POLISHED WARE RED AND BROWN WARE Red and brown ware is distinctively characteristic of the ruins found along the Little Colorado, and of those south of this river to the border of Mexico. The decorations on this ware (plate XXVI) found along the Colorado river are much more complicated than those of southern Arizona, where plain red ware is almost universal. In both regions the color is no doubt due to the composition of the avail- able clay, and to changes in firing. Bricks made from this clay at the aA large number of these vessels were found in the more southern ruins excavated in 1897, especially that near Snowflake, Arizona, where the largest collections were made that year. As this pottery will be discussed at length in the report for that year, it is barely mentioned in this section of the memoir. FEWKES) POTTERY FROM THE LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 59 present time have much the same texture and color as the ancient vessels—probably for the same reason. YELLOW WARE The fine yellow ware which is characteristic of the old ruins near the inhabited Hopi pueblos is not found in the Little Colorado ruins. There are many pieces (plates XXVII, XXVIII) which approach it in color, but for the most part they lack that fine gloss which distin- guishes ceramic objects of Sikyatki, Old Shumopovi, and other Hopi ruins. While this difference may be in part ascribed to the chemical components of the clay, the skill of the potter must also be given due eredit. While yellow ware was sparingly made in the southern pueblos, it reached its highest development in the villages which are nearest the modern Hopi. In the decline of pottery making the fine old yellow ware has greatly deteriorated, and, although clever Hano artists copy it with some success, they have never been able to equal the finest specimens which the author has dug out of Sikyatki sand hills. BLACK WARE The Santa Clara pueblo Indians of New Mexico, as is well known, make a characteristic black ware. The author has thus far failed to find any specimens of this ware in Tusayan, but in the ruins of Homo- lobi, Chevlon, and Chaves pass several food basins were found the interiors of which were blackened and apparently glazed in the same manner as is the Santa Clara pottery. In no instance, however, was the external surface thus blackened. Some of these food basins with black interior were of coiled ware; others were of smooth ware, but all were destitute of other decoration. BLACK AND WHITE WARE The so-called black and white ware is found almost universally in cliff houses throughout the Southwest, and has been thought to be characteristic of this kind of dwelling. In his excavations at Sik- yatki, however, the author found several pieces, and the same kind was also taken from the older quarter of the ruin of Awatobi. Several beautiful pieces of black and white ware, with decorations which are identical with those of pottery from Colorado cliff houses, were taken from the burial places at Old Shumopovi. In the Homolobi and Chevlon ruins a number of most interesting bowls, vases, and dip- pers of this kind of ware (plate Xx) were exhumed, and the same style of ware occurred at Chaves pass. It appears, therefore, that black and white ware is not uncommon in ruins of pueblos in the plains as well as in cliff houses, which is but one of many evidences of the similarities in culture of the peoples inhabiting these two kinds of ancient dwellings. The author was at one time disposed to regard these pieces as heirlooms, but the considerable number of specimens 60 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 found would seem to indicate contemporary habitation of the villages and cliff houses from which they have been taken. No specimen of the black and white ware in the collection is deco- rated with designs representing human beings or animals, and even pictures of birds, so abundant on other colored ware, are wanting. The designs are purely geometrical figures, which are ordinarily regarded as the most ancient style of ornamentation. These geomet- rical figures, however, are very complicated—as a rule far superior to similar decorations on other colored ware. They duplicate for the most part the patterns on black and white ware from the cliff dwell- ings of southern Colorado and western New Mexico, the headwaters of the Salado and Gila rivers. Among the specimens of black and white ware there are several dippers made of a very fine paste almost as compactly hardened as rock. wy . 38. Three lines of life. Design on food bow] from Chevlon (number 156138) dents, and a large literature has accumulated on that subject. This form of decoration is the simplest in motive, the most widely spread over the pueblo area, and also probably the most ancient. Its relations to decoration of textile art products are pointed out by several writers, and there are many evidences of the evolution of complicated geo- metrical figures from simple forms. There are also evidences of their origin by conventionalization of more elaborate patterns through symbolism. The design on the food basin shown in figure 38 is unique and highly instructive in one important feature. Encireling bands or lines on specimens of ancient pottery are ordinarily broken at one point, as 84 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [BTH. ANN, 22 can readily be seen by an examination of figures in the report on Sikyatki pottery, as well asin the present memoir. The design before us has three breaks in these eneirecling bands. The break in the interior band is complicated by the addition of well-known terraced figures. By modification in form and by the interlocking of these appendages we pass easily to some of the most complicated geomet- rical patterns of Pueblo pottery. . A modification of the broken line about a vase appears in the specimen shown in plate XxxXvic. In this instance we find the band continued into two narrow extensions, which interlock but do not F1G. 39. Geometrical designs on a food bow] from Chaves pass (number 157539). join. The figure which is thus formed is a common one in geomet- rical ornamentation, as may be seen by an examination of the many beautiful pieces of pottery obtained from the ruins in all parts of Arizona. Not less instructive than the last-mentioned in a study of geomet- rical ornamentation is the design in figure 59. The spiral figures on two of the bands show a modification of the broken lines which are characteristic, and the S-shaped ornaments on one of the other bands are COmmon On ancient pueblo ware. FEWKES] MOSAICS FROM THE LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 85 A combination of oblique lines and fret, shown in figure 40, is the most unusual design in the collections which it has been the author’s fortune thus far to examine. The same design is worked ina basket from the same ruin (figure 63). The design figured on the interior of the food bowl shown in fig- ure 41is unique, reminding one of a swastika with arms split into two parts. We recognize in it the familiar Fic. 41. Food bowl with geometrical patterns (number 156427). triangle and crook, but the long scythe-like projec- tions on the periphery of the design are rarely found in ancient pottery decoration. The decoration of another food bowl from Homo- lobi is likewise unique, but it is formed of familiar decorative designs arranged in an irregular manner, ORNAMENTS Fie. 40. Broken fret on food bowl from Cheylon (number 157895). MOSAICS The ancient pueblo peoples of Arizona were adepts in making mosaic, some examples of which rival in excellence the work of a similar kind in old Mexico. The author’s explorations in 1896 revealed different kinds of this craft, several of which are unique. The southernmost ruin, that in Chaves pass, yielded the most beautiful specimen, but those found at Chevlon were almost as fine, and the variety was greater. TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [PrH. ANN. 22 (0 2) ~ or) In the course of excavation there were found in the soil, near a buried body, a large number of accurately squared turquoises which were so small that they could hardly have served for ornament alone, and with them were found worked shells covered with a tenacious pitch. In one of these collections there are several larger fragments, evidently turquoise ear pendants. Later excavations explained the character of these turquoises, for they were found to be duplicated in specimens of fine mosaic ware. It is well known that Ilopi women at the Fic. 42. Mosaic gorget from Chaves pass (number 157850). present day wear ear pendants made of Length about 2 inches. square wooden plates, upon which are ce- mented rude mosaics of turquoise. The modern work of this kind is comparatively coarse, and evidently is made of old turquoises, some of which are perforated and were formerly used as beads. The tur- quoise stones employed are not accurately fitted, and the black gum in which they are embedded shows between the stones. The ancient work (plate XLIV) is much finer and more beautiful than the modern. Specimen 159850 is a turquoise mosaic set on wood, but it was so broken that it was impossible to tell what its form was. The specimen shown in figure 42 is an elongated gorget of wood with shell and turquoise incrustation; it was found at the Chevlon ruin, and is one of the most beautiful of prehistoric mosaics. Figure 43 shows a pear-shaped pendant made of bone with turquoise mosaic on one side and incised chevrons on the opposite. It is perforated at the blunter end as though for suspension. The specimen was taken from the Chevlon ruin, and is unique. The collection contains also a number of fragments.of turquoise and ¥ 7 51A6 = Fig. 43. Bone ear pendants other stone mosaies, and of catlinite and tur- Rey (GREE eee quoise embedded in gum on wood. These were 157852). Length about 2 from the Chevlon ruin. Many other square ieee turquoises, evidently formerly parts of a mosaic,were collected at the same ruin. The specimen shown in figure 45 was found near the mastoid process of the skull of a woman. It was evidently an ear pendant, one attached to the ear by a string. Two other specimens of bone inerusted with stone mosaic were found at Chevlon. One of the most beautiful examples of mosaic was a worked shell of Pectunculus giganteus covered with turquoise stones embedded in pitch. It was found on the sternum of a skeleton from Chaves pass, and was buried several feet below the surface of the ground. Plate XLIV shows two views of this unique and precious specimen, one from above and one from the umbo of the shell. In the former = FEWKES] ORNAMENTS FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS roll aimedian rectangular fragment of red jasper is shown, and in the latter appears the hole by which the ornament was formerly sus- pended. The latter likewise shows legs, suggesting a frog, turtle, or toad. The arrangement of the lines of turquoise on the opposite rim, obscurely seen in the upper view, has been regarded as represent- ing the hind legs of the same animal. The technic of this mosaic recalls work of the same general character on dirk handles and masks from Mexico. Several additional specimens of similar stone mosaic on shells were found, but these were much broken and impossible of restoration. The mosaic frog was broken when found, but the anterior end was entire and still clinging to the shell when dug from the ground. A summary of the specimens of mosaic collected is given with their catalogue numbers in the following list: Number Article (1740) Squared fragments of turquoise formerly incrusted on shell 157849 Square lignite pendant for ear, with turquoise in each corner and middle 159850 Pendant of wood incrusted with stones 157852 Pyriform ear pendant of bone, with turquoise incrustation 158068 Fragments of a mosaic of turquoise and other stones 157848 Fragments of stone mosaic on wood 157932 Fragments of stone mosaic on wood 157851 Mosaic frog, toad. or turtle LIGNITE ORNAMENTS One of the common uses of lignite was that of ornament. The specimen represented in figure 44 is a square ear pendant, taken from near the mastoid process of a human skull in the Cheylon cemetery. It is made of lignite, nicely pol ished and accurately squared. In each cor- ner and in the middle on one face irregular turquoises are set in depressions, while on the obverse, near the middle, there is an eyelet in the substance of the pendant. The button-shaped gorget shown in figure 45, unfortunately broken, was flat on one side, and convex on the opposite, which was smoothly polished. The striz across the Pig. 44. Lignite ear pendant from Cheylon (number 157849) flat side suggest the polishing stone, and Natural size. the perforations point to suspension by a string orthong. This is one of the best formed lignite buttons in the eolleetion, but ruder forms have been taken from other ruins. 88 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN, 22 Unworked fragments of lignite are rare, and the material appears to have been brought to Chevlon from some distance, although it is common in the rocks near the modern Hopi villages. Fig. 45. Lignite gorget. Slightly reduced. SHELL ORNAMENTS The collections made in the summer of 1896 were particularly rich in ornaments made from marine shells. The largest number of these were found in the ruins at Chevlon and Chaves pass, although a con- siderable number of specimens were collected from the ruins of the Homolobi group. The shells used in making these ornaments belong to the Pacifie coast fauna, and no doubt came through barter to the people who once inhabited the towns of the Little Colorado, for it is well known that there was a considerable trade in early times in these shells, and long trips were taken by the Pueblo Indians for trade purposes. The intercourse of northern and southern peoples of Arizona through trading expeditions continued to quite recent times, but judging from the number of specimens which were found in the ruins it must have been considerably greater in prehistorie times than it is at present. In fact, much of the decline in this traffic is probably to be traced to the modification of the southern Arizonian aborigines and the introduction of new ornaments by the whites. One of the most highly prized of these ‘marine shells was a species EE FEWKES] SHELL ORNAMENTS FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 89 of Pectunculus,” which was worked in many shapes, or preserved in practically the same form as when taken from the sea. A number of these were very fresh looking; others were more or less decayed. Some of the most characteristic specimens are shells with round holes in the middle. It would appear that these are ornaments; and as one of these objects was found near the wrist bone of a man it was judged to be a wristlet. It is suggestive that these perforated shells were generally found in pairs, as though belonging to some dual organ. Five specimens of perforated Pectunculus shells were found at .Chayes pass (one of them a fragment smeared with gum), and the same number at Homo- lobi. Pectunculus shells were worked into armlets, or large rings,’ by cutting out the whole middle of the shell, leaving the rim, which was ground to a Fic. 46. Incised armlet from Cheylon (number smooth surface. The umbo 157843). Diameter about 3! inches. was carved into a shell-shaped elevation, and the surface was often incised with characteristic designs. The following specimens were found: Number Locality and description 157824 Chaves pass: 3 specimens 157659 Chaves pass; 2 specimens 157704 Chaves pass: found on a humerus 157295 Chevlon; with inserted turquoise 157843 Chevlon; with incised design 156760 Homolobi; 2 specimens 157902 Homolobi; fragments There are also several fragments from an unknown locality. As a rule, the surface of these armlets is smooth and without ornament, but one specimen (figure 46) was beautifully decorated with a characteristic incised fret covering the whole outer surface. ‘The design consisted of a series of lines interlocking at extremities, though not joining. This figure is one of the simple forms of a characteristic decorative motive widespread over the whole pueblo area. In its simplest expression it appears as two crescents turned in opposite directions, with the two horns adjacent. It is thus painted on the breasts of certain katcinas (personations of supernatural beings), and «The following specimens were taken from Homolobi, Chevlon, and Chaves pass: Number of specimens, 114; incrusted with stone mosaic, 1; incrusted with pitch, 1; armlet. incised, 1; arm- let, inlaid with turquoise. 1; armlets, not ornamented, 10 (many additional fragments); wristlets, 44 (many additional fragments): finger rings, 30 (many additional fragments); fragments incrusted on wood, 2; carved in imitation of frog, 1; shells not worked, 3; shells with medial perforation, 20. > Popularly but erroneously called * earrings.” 90 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS {ETH. ANN, 22 on shields, or is cut in pictographs. But it is in decoration of pottery that this simple form reaches its highest modification and complica- tion, and it is remarkable how many complex figures can be reduced to this simple type. The horns of the two crescents may elongate and develop into square frets or spiral extensions, and these in turn may be continued into triangular appendages with dentate or serrate mar- gins. They may become terraced figures, their edges so closely approxi- mated as to be separated by zigzag intervals, which in all cases are but the space left by the break. With all these modifications, no matter how complicated, the motive can be reduced to the two horns of adjacent crescents opening toward each other, but not joining. The break is comparable to that in encircling bands drawn on pueblo pottery, called the broken lines or “‘lines of life.” Consider such a line about a vase, bowl, or jar to be broken at several points, or, as the author found in several instances, to have three breaks, and the ends so extended as to overlap the intervals either above or below; modify the extremities thus extended into terraced figures, spirals, or frets, and we have some of the developments of this most char- acteristic of all motives in the geometrical designs of decorated Pueblo pottery. This broken line, with its modifications, is used almost universally as a decorative motive by Pueblo Fig. 47. Armlet with inlaid turquoise, from potters, ancient and modern, Cheylon (number 157295). Diameter about 3} nie 2 Dera Lente Ge ea whether living in pueblos, cliffs, or caves. The design on the armlet shown in the figure is a modification of the same motive. A single specimen of armlet, shown in figure 47, has a turquoise set in the outer surface near the edge. The stone was probably fastened there with pitch, the armlet being the only specimen of shell inlaid with turquoise in the collection. The wristlets were made of the same genus as were the armlets, but from smaller specimens. A number of these ornaments were found in some instances encircling the radius and ulna. The major- ity were from Chaves pass. Twenty-nine complete specimens were secured here, together with many fragments, and one specimen was found at Homolobi. Bracelets made of this shell are smaller, slighter, as a rule less care- fully worked, but more abundant than the armlets. The majority are perforated at the umbo, but the valves are so ground down that there remains no space for the heart-shaped elevation; indeed, the thickness of the shell would not admit of it. Like the armlets, they are sometimes found free in a grave, as though east there as a votive offering, but there can be no doubt that they were bracelets, for in FEWKES] SHELL OBJECTS FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 91 more than one instance the author has taken them from the bones of the arm. Similar specimens often have been described as ear pend- ants, and they may in some instances have served for this purpose, but all of these objects found in the Little Colorado river graves were bracelets. A number of, finger rings made from small specimens of Pectun- culus were found at Chaves pass. Two fragments of Pectunculus were fashioned in the shape of gor- gets. One of these, from Chevlon, was perforated with two holes; the other was crescentic, with a single perforation. The latter was found in a grave at Cheyvlon. Unworked specimens of Peetunculus were not numerous, but three were found at the Chaves pass ruins, and one at Chevlon. In this connection may likewise be mentioned a clay imitation of a Pectuneulus shell from Kisakobi, the site of old Walpi. Two specimens from Chaves pass were smeared with a tenacious pitch and probably formerly incrusted with turquoise, squared frag- ments of which were found near by. Three species of Conus (C. fergusoni, C. princeps, and C. regularis) were found in pre- historic graves. These were favorite shells for the manufacture of rattles, and they are still used for that purpose by the Hopis. The spire was ground away on a plane at right angles to 4,, 43 ghell used for the lip, making a conical object perforated at rattle, from Chevlon the apex. The larger specimens (see figure 48) 9 (™™™mPer DISH). were probably tied to a short crook, and were used as rattles with which to beat time to the sacred songs. Smaller specimens, found in great numbers on some of the skeletons, served as tinklers, and were apparently tied to garments of the deceased in much the same fashion that the tin cones are appended to the kilts of Snake priests in the Snake dance. The number of specimens of Conus, especially of Conus princeps, was large, and the majority were found at the ruin in Chaves pass. One of the best preserved of the specimens is shown in figure 48. This was probably a part of an ancient rattle, and the cut shows the hole which formerly served as the place of suspension. Several of the smaller specimens were found near the pelvis of a skeleton, as though they were formerly tied to kilts, as is suggested above. A single specimen of the Turritella shell was found at the Cheylon ruin, but with the exception of a perforation near the lip it was not worked. At the present day Turritella is so highly esteemed that specimens of it are attached by a string to several of the tiponis, or palladia, of religious societies. 92 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN, 22 Haliotis shells were prized by the ancient Hopi pueblos, and are still highly regarded and used for decoration among the modern Tusayan Indians. Three specimens were found at Chaves pass. These were entire, though very much eroded, when they were dug out of the earth. They were the larg- est and most beautiful specimens of Hali- otis which the author has seen from ancient Arizona ruins. Several fragments of this shell were found, all apparently worked, two being perforated for suspension. A Strombus shell from the Chevlon ruin has a ring of pigment about the umbo, but one from Chaves pass is undecorated. i One of the most highly prized for orna- Fic. 49. Shell ornament from ental purposes of all Pacific coast shells Homolobi (number 156391). = : 5 = was Cardium, which made its way by bar- ter in prehistoric times throughout all the New Mexican and Arizonan pueblos. Figure 50, from Chaves pass, was a nicely carved imitation of a toad or frog. A somewhat smaller shell carving in the form of a frog is figured by Holmes in a former report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. The fragment of a shell which the author is unable to identify was found at the Chevlon ruin (figure 51). The figure was elongated, with two "0. >? Shell frog lateral extensions arranged in pairs on each side, — ber 157833). Length and suggested a highly conventionalized animal, — *P0vt 1! mehes. The author has no suggestion to make in regard to its former use, and only two specimens of shell carved in this shape were found by him. Besides these more common shells, many speci- mens of Melongena patula, Oliva angulata, and Fic. 51. Shell object QOliva biplicata or hiatula were obtained. from Cheylon (num- E 5 ber 157251). The crescentic shell ornament shown in figure 52, which was evidently hung to some part of the body by the hole midway in its length, may have been a_ gorget, or possibly a pendant for a necklace. Its form is unique. In addition to the specimens, of sea shells which preserved enough of their natural form to render identification possi- Fie. 52. Shell gorget from Chevlon (number Cog 157850.) ble, the author collected many fragments of unknown relationship. It is probable that the major- ity of these belong to some one of the species already mentioned. Of unidentified fragments perhaps the most numerous were shell — FEWKES] TRADE IN PACIFIC COAST SHELLS 938 beads, of which there were many hundreds. Some of these were large and of coarse make, but others were so minute that it remains a marvel how they could have been manufactured with the rude implements a stone-age people had at its control. In some instances the perforations were but a trifle larger than the diameter of a fine needle, with rim not over a sixteenth of an inch wide. The thickness of these beads was not greater than that of paper. All the species of shells which were found in ruins belong to the molluscan fauna of the Pacific, and are still used for ceremonial or ornamental purposes in modern Hopi pueblos. A majority of these have been collected in cliff houses and cavate dwellings, and likewise occur in even greater numbers in the ruins along the Gila and Salado rivers in southern Arizona. Not a single specimen was found which could be traced to the Atlantic watershed, but the source of all was the Pacific ocean, or, what is practically for our purposes the same, the gulf of California. Still more significant is the fact that the art upon them—the symbolism with which they are decorated—is identical with that on the pottery of the ancient sedentary people of southern Arizona. It may be said that the simple existence of these shells in the ruins from the Gila valley to modern Tusayan can be explained on the the- ory of barter, and that their distribution does not prove racial kinship of former owners is self-evident. The theory thatthe same symbolism and treatment of the material originated independently can not be seriously urged in this case. While there is no proof one way or the other that these shells were worked by the people who lived in the ancient ruins, if is probable that the ancestors of the Hopis may have brought them in their migrations from the south. That the cul- ture came to Tusayan from the south appears probable, and Hopi traditionists claim that not only their culture, but also the ancestors of certain component clans of their people came from that direction into Tusayan. So far as archeological researches bearing on this problem are concerned, they verify the claim that the remote ancestors of the Patki people of Tusayan formerly inhabited the Gila-Salado drainage area, and were closely allied to the Pimas, or some other tribe of that slope. BONE IMPLEMENTS The collection of bone implements was large and varied in character, In the specimens from Chaves pass, where, from the nature of the country, antelope were abundant, we find a large number of bone implements made of the leg bones of the Cervidee (see figure 53), but in the ruins of the Little Colorado, that is, Homolobi and Cheylon, bird bones commonly formed the material from which they were made, and few large bone awls were found. CES TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 The only specimen of a carved-bone implement is shown in figure 54. It was made from the bone of a deer or antelope, and has a quadruped carved on one end, the head and legs being well represented. The specimen is one of the few found at the small ruin of the Homolobi group near the bank of the Little Colorado, about four miles from Winslow. The general form of one of the small bone awls is shown in the Fic. 53. Bone awl from Chaves pass (number 158097). accompanying cut, figure 55. As a rule, the bone of which they are made is so worked that the rounded end fits the palm of the hand and the sharpened extremity is continued to a needle-like point. These awls are made of the bones of different animals, of which the turkey is the most popular. They were probably used in ancient times in sewing or darning fabrics, possibly in weaving. The modern Fie. 54. Carved bone awl from Homolobi (number 157866) Hopis used a few years ago in weaving a bone awl not very unlike that figured above, but of late they have adopted an iron implement. At Chaves pass seven small bone awls were found, at Homolobi five, and at Chevlon four. Sixteen needle-like bone implements with eyes were found at Homolobi; fifteen were obtained at Chaves pass, and three at Chevlon. Fic. 55. Bone implement from Chaves pass (number 157867). Another bone implement that was common at the Chaves pass ruins was shaped like a bodkin. Thirteen specimens were found. A number of bone tubes, some of which were perforated and others not, were found in the excavations. Some of these tubes had holes in the sides, diametrically opposite, and were identified as bird whistles. One of these resembles the whistle still used in ceremonials con- nected with making medicine in the modern Tusayan rites. owe eee FEWKES] BONE IMPLEMENTS FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 95 Five specimens of small half-tubes showed evidence of having been attached in pairs, as the marking of the binding string on the bone is still visible. These were probably whistles, the noise being made by a thin edge. There are several bone tubes which resemble ‘*‘ bone implements’ found by Nordenskiéld in the cliff houses of the Mesa Verde, where they are considered ‘* beads made of the humerus of a large bird, prob- ably the turkey.”@ Possibly the tubes from Chaves pass may likewise be beads, which, how- ever, is not the case wih the Mesa Verde specimens. Inthe FiG.53. Bone tube from Homolobi (number account of the excavations at Die Sikyatki similar bone beads, found about the neck of one of the skeletons, are mentioned. > Sixteen of these bone tube-like objects were secured at Homolobi, three at Chaves pass, and one at Cheylon. In addition to the common forms of implements already described, many other specimens were obtained. Some of these were too frag- mentary to make possible an identification of their former uses. Of these mis- cellaneous bone imple- ments, eighteen complete Fic. 57. Stick used by stick swallower, from Cheylon Se ae and Beveral (number 158076). fragments were secured from the ruins at Homo- lobi. A very few objects were found at Chaves pass and Chevlon. The specimen shown in figure 57 is one of the most interesting bone objects in the collection. It is made from a deer or antelope leg bone, is flat on one side and rounded on the opposite, and tapers toa sharp edge at one extremity. It was affirmed by one of the work- men employed by the author that this is the shaft of one of the sticks used by the stick swallowers in their ceremonies. TURTLE CARAPACES Near one of the skeletons in the cemetery at Chevlon were found two circular objects made of the carapace of a turtle belonging to the genus Chrysemeis, but not the indigenous species. One of these was perforated (see figure 58) and the other was not, but when found both were in four fragments—not broken, but haying fallen apart at the sutures. The faces were ground smooth and the whole form had been considerably changed. These disks may have been spindle whorls. a The Cliff Dwellers of the Mesa Verde, Stockholm, 1893, pl. XL, fig. 22. 96 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 HORN OBJECTS Two fragments of bone or horn for which the author is unable to assign any use were dug up at Chaves pass. One of these was per- forated, and had a number of indentations on the edge imparting to it the appearance of a fire board. It may have been used in kindling fires. ; Two fragments of deer horn were found in one grave. These were more or less worn, and one of the Hopis is responsible for the infor- mation that chips of similar horns are at the present day drunk with water as a medicine. ‘‘The deer,” he says, ‘“‘has a good heart.” PIGMENTS The custom of placing a small earthern vessel with different col- ored pigments with the dead was practiced by the people of Chaves pass, Chevlon ruin, Homolobi, and Old Shumopovi. The pigments used were the same as those now employed, and had apparently the same cere- monial significance. As these sub- stances are now highly prized, and as there is every reason to suppose that they were regarded in the same way in ancient times, the burial of pig- ments with the dead may have been of the nature of a sacrifice. Some of the modern Shumopovi Indians begged for fragments of Fig. 58. Disk of turtleshell,from Chevlon green carbonate of copper whieh (number 157841). Diameter nearly 3 . % eS ° aia were found in the graves of their ancestors, for use in painting their ceremonial objects and for other purposes. Specimens of red paint (sesquioxide of iron), blue paint (azurite), green paint (carbonate of copper), and ; white paint (kaolin) were found at the various ruins visited. Some were ground, while others were in lumps occasionally in the form of a cylinder or disk. In his account of the ruins of Sikyatki the author called attention to objeets in the forms of disks, cylinders, and the like, which were found in cemeteries of that ancient pueblo. Their uses were said to be problematic and he now has to record the finding of other objects of the same nature and form which are equally enigmatic (figure 59). One of these from Homolohi is a hemispherical fragment of kaolin, Fic. 59. Kaolin cup from Chaves pass (number 157928). Se ee Le ee FEWKES] OBJECTS FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 97 recalling those exhumed from Sikyatki; there was also a cylindrical object of the same material from the Cheylon ruin, but the most exceptional specimen was a disk-formed object of kaolin with a depression in one side, resembling a small mortar. These various forms into which the easily cut kaolin is worked would seem to have served some important office, the nature of which is unknown to the author. Kaolin at the present day is used for whitening cotton blankets, sashes, and kilts, and for painting the bodies and limbs of those who participate in sacred festivals. Possibly some of these fragments are simply pigments. CLOTH Considering the number of graves opened in the course of the exca- vations, it is remarkable that so few specimens of cloth were found. This may be ascribed, not to the poverty of the inhabitants of the ancient villages in woven fabrics, but to the rapidity with which cloth decays in the moist soil. One or two of the specimens which were found were preserved by the copper carbonate with which they were Vr V7 2~V\GW\“ 4 \ IN Fic. 60. Matting from Cheylon (number 157912). About 5 by 2} inches. in contact, but the fragments were small and the manner of weaving difficult to discover. From one of the specimens it appears that the hair of some animal was used, and there is no doubt from others that yucea fiber was extensively employed. The impression of string was observed on several sticks, but the string itself was too much decayed for identification. Two fragments were discovered at Homolobi and ene at Chaves pass. MATTING It appears that the bodies of the dead, especially at the Chevlon ruin, were wrapped in matting, fragments of which were in many instances well preserved. This matting was a loosely woven fabric, made of vegetable fiber which the author is unable to identify, and 22 ETH—04——7 98 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN, 22 was most abundant in the Chevlon ruin. It does not appear to be common in the interments at Chaves pass, and was only sparingly found at Homolobi. In the accompanying cut (figure 60) a portion of one of the best specimens of this matting is shown as a type. The specimen from which this fragment was taken is large, ample enough to cover the head and parts of the shoulders. BASKETRY The specimens of basketry found in the ancient burial places were of two kinds, one corresponding with that now made at Oraibi and | —S — a —SSS=S Sap WW Fiq. 61. Basketry of Oraibi type, from Chevlon (number 157918). Length about 5 inches. another similar to the basketry of the Middle mesa. It was the cus- tom to bury these objects with the dead, as is still a common usage in Tusayan, as receptacles for food and as other mortuary offerings. These baskets were ornamented with woven patterns, and in some instances were covered with a thick layer of green, blue, or red paint. In form they were generally plaque-like, but one of the specimens FEWKES] BASKETS FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS S)) which was almost entire was deeper and basket-like. All were browned with age, and the majority of specimens were fragmentary. One of the best specimens of the Oraibi style of basketry is shown in figure 61, which represents a sector of a plaque in ; which the colors are still preserved. The manner of plaiting this basket is the same as that practiced at the Hopi pueblo, as is shown by the accompanying cut, figure 62. The inhabitants of ancient Chevlon were familiar with the method of making basketry by coiling, as at the Middle mesa of the Hopis to-day. There are many specimens of this ancient coiled basketry in =. eee the collection, but the specimen shown in figure 63 — Oraibi type, show- is one of the most perfect found. The design is the ™g™mannerofplait- same as that shown on some of the ceramic objects. ox One specimen of coiled ware and two fragments were found at Chaves pass, and twelve specimens of coiled ware and two of the Oraibi pattern at Chevlon. Yj, hyp Y) wii) i" i i) ny f May Mad Uy Z Ger Wy A) Fig. 63. Basketry of coiled type, from Chevlon (number 157915), Diameter about 5 inches. PRAYER-STICKS Several forms of prayer-sticks, or pahos, were collected from the dif- ferent ruins in 1896, but the majority were so decayed that their orig- inal forms were unrecognizable. Small prayer-sticks painted green were found at Shumopovi, and these were apparently not unlike those now used in the neighboring pueblo. LOO TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 The pahos from Chayes pass were painted bright blue, the pigment used being azurite. These had a single stick as long as the arm, between a half inch and an inch in diameter, and were apparently laid by the side of the body when buried, in some instances resting on the left arm. So thoroughly decayed, however, was the wood of which they were made that it was difficult to take an unbroken speci- men from the earth. An unusual form of paho was found in a grave at Chaves pass. It consisted of a wooden disk with a short handle, and was not unlike a hand mirror. The whole object was painted green, with an obscure figure in red on one face. The disk was perforated in the middle, and there were markings or impressions of feathers on the green pig- ment with whieh it was painted. In one of the graves a spheroidal wooden object was found, with daubs of pigment upon it, which recalls the squash pahos found in the Awatobi shrine, and has like- nesses to the modern prayer eagle eggs made of wood, such as can be found in a shrine at Tirkinobi, near Walpi. The pahos from Homolobi and Cheylon are small, and as a rule are painted green with copper carbonate. They were neither as finely made nor as complicated as those of Sikyatki, where the best ancient prayer-sticks yet found have been obtained. In the Chaves pass graves the prayer-stick was very long and painted blue with azurite or green with carbonate of copper. The most interesting and exceptional form of prayer-stick collected in 1896 was that obtained at Chevlon. It was disk-like in form, had an attachment at one end or on the rim, and was painted green and decorated with red designs. The author has found no similar prayer- stick in use in any Hopi ceremonial which he has witnessed. Bow AND ARROWS Almost a complete bow and several fragments of arrows or reeds were dug out of a grave at the Chevlon ruin. These were taken from the same place as the gaming reeds about to be mentioned. The association of gaming implementsand the weapons of a warrior in the same grave is highly suggestive. GAMING CANES One of the mortuary bowls excavated from the Chevlon cemetery contained five half canes (figure 64) which recall those used in the Zuni game known as sholiwe.” These reeds are not, however, marked as are those now used at Zuni, and differ from those found on a bowl from Shumopovi (figure 74). The author believes, however, that the game in which they were employed was practically the same. aSee Owens’s figure of sholiwe reeds in Popular Science Monthly, May, 1891. According to Owens, four pieces of reed are employed in this game by the Zunis. The manner of throwing the reeds is clearly indicated by this author FEWKES] OBJECTS FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 101 One or two food bowls were found in which figures of these gaming reeds are painted on the inside of the bowl, as is mentioned later in this report. SEEDS Many of the food basins contained seeds of maize or squash, and ears of maize from which the kernels had decayed were found in several bowls. The ears or cobs show that the maize was a small variety, like that found in cliff houses and still cultivated by the modern Hopi farm- ers. The occurrence of squash seeds in some of the mortuary bowls is important, indicating the ancient use of this vegetable for food. It may, in this connec- tion, be borne in mind that one of the southern clans of the Hopi In- dians was called the Patun or Squash fam- ily, which is still repre- sented at Oraibiand the Middle mesa, although it is extinct at Walpi. Numerous other small seeds too shriveled for identification were found in the mortuary offerings in the ceme- teries of Homolobi and Chevlon. It would seem from the nature of a matrix in which they were inclosed that they had been boiled or cooked in some way. Fic. 64. Gaming canes from Chevlon (number 158030). Length about 3} inches. Foop Almost every bowl found in the cemeteries contained fragments of what appeared to have been food, but in most instances this was too much destroyed to be identified. It was ordinarily in the form of a thin film coating the interior of the bowl, and was penetrated by roots which had found their way from the surface of the ground. There is little doubt that in some instances this food was one of the many kinds of corn bread so common among the modern Hopis. 102 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN. 22 STONE IMPLEMENTS In the type ‘‘ pounding stones” are included stone implements, ordi- narily of small and medium sizes, showing marks of battering at one or both ends. Apparently they were not attached to a handle, and the indication is that they were simply held in the hand when in use. With these pounders various substances were bruised, pigments were ground, hide was made more pliable, and similar processes were effected. Any rounded stone conven- ient to handle appears to have been taken for this purpose. At Homo- lobi thirteen stone ob- jeets were found which were doubtless used as pounding implements, at Chaves pass four, and Fic. 65, Stone implement from Homolobi (number 157895). zu Chevion Le: Length about 6} inches. ; Stone axes were even more common. At Ho- molobi twenty-four specimens were found, at Chevlon two. Several weapons made of a black stone, one of which is shown in figure 65, were collected at Homolobi. These were evidently either celts or spearheads, for there was no sign of hafting or of polishing, and marks of fracture were apparent. The specimen represented in figure 66 is of white stone, possibly aragonite; it was the only weapon of this material which was found. The shape is regular and the surface smooth, and there is a groove for ahandle. It has four grooves cut on one edge and incised crosses, FiaG. 66, Stone ax from Homolobi (number 157024). Length about 7 inches. two in number, one of which is shown in the cut. No indication of a handle accompanied this implement, which leads the author to sup- pose that that part was of wood, which had long ago decayed. There were several stone implements with a cutting edge on one side which were probably used as knives. These are sometimes curved, but generally straight. The best stone knives are two from the Chevlon ruin. ee FEWKES] STONE IMPLEMENTS FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS. 103 Several of these knife-like objects had dentate edges, as though used for saws. The author has elsewhere noted the frequency with which fragments of obsidian, and chips from the same, occur in ancient Pueblo graves, or on the surface of mounds, indicating ruins. The three sites of explorations in 1896 were not exceptional in this particular, and a somewhat limited amount of material of this nature was collected at Homolobi, Chevlon, and Chaves pass. This material was prized in ancient times for arrow points, spearheads, and knives, and the sharp edges of many of the chips were probably used for cutting. Arrow points were found in large numbers at the various ruins visited on the Little Colorado. The present Hopi Indians use a grooved stone for polishing arrows. These stones are ordinarily of a coarse sandstone, which acts as a file on the wooden object rubbed back and forth in the groove. Similar polishing stones are very common in ruins, assuming a number of shapes, and made of several different kinds of roeck—as sandstone, lava, slate, and even clay. It is probable that these stones were used for the same purpose as those employed in the modern kivas, as their form has not changed from ancient times. The differences in the polishing stones from the ruins at Homolobi, Cheylon, and Chaves pass were not very great, as the simplicity of the implement admits of but few varieties. Those from Chaves pass were made of lava, which occurs only rarely in the other two ruins. There were double- as well as single-grooved polishing stones, and shallow- and deep-grooved ones. It is possible that some of the per- forated stones may have been used as polishers for arrows in much the same way as the modern grooved stones are employed. One of these arrow polishers had the shape of an animal, and was narrowed to a head at one end. On this end was cut a mouth and two depres- sions in the proper positions for eyes. The surface of the stone on the side opposite that occupied by the groove was flat and smooth, so that the object could be firmly placed when in use. It appears to have been a mortuary custom among the people who lived in the ancient pueblos along the Little Colorado to deposit with women and girls at death a metate and its grinder. These were ordi- narily reversed when buried, as though symbolic of the death of the one who formerly used them. In one of the Homolobi graves three of these metates with their corresponding hand stones were found, and these were added to the collection. They were made of rocks of dif- ferent degrees of smoothness, and were evidently formerly used in grinding corn in the same way as in modern Hopi pueblos. The maize was bruised and roughly ground on one of these stones, then it was passed to a finer-grained one, and ultimately to the finest of all. These metates were much worn, showing long and constant us 104 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN, 22 Many large and very heavy metates made of lava rock were found at Chaves pass, but these were not brought to the railroad. Several of these were worn so deep in one face as to form troughs. If there were no other evidence of long occupation of this ruin the deeply worn metates would furnish it. These metates were bulky, and were quarried in the bad lands of the vicinity of the old pueblo. It is instructive to note that metates, rather than smaller and more port- able stone objects, show the influence of geological environment, for as arule their size requires that they be made of the rock contiguous to the ruin. Sandstone metates are commonest in the valley ruins, lava in those built of lava rocks. The same is true of the stones of which the walls of the ancient habitations were constructed. The material of the grinding stones is the same as that of the metates. They are for the most part simple elongated slabs, some- times with depressions along the sides to enable the manipulator to obtain a stronger hold. Like metates they show the effect of wear on one face, being generally rounded on the upper surface. Several of these stones are double faced, or when seen in profile they are trian- gular. These specimens, which are of softer and finer rock than the others, were undoubtedly used in the last stage of grinding the kernels of corn into fine meal. Ten of these meal grinders were found at Homolobi and Chevlon. Stone implements of mushroom form are among the interesting objects obtained in our excavations. These are well adapted for paint or pigment grinders. The mortars in which paint is ground are ordinarily small stone slabs with a depression in one face. These are sometimes rectan- gular in form, often circular, and the depth of the depression varies, being frequently very slight. The same variety of paint mortars is in use to-day, and many of these stone objects now used in the kivas are no doubt very ancient. The small stones with one flattened face were doubtless used as grinders; in some instances they are much worn. The list of paint mortars includes two from Homolobi and three from Cheylon. STONE SLABS The use of slats or slabs of stone decorated with figures painted in various pigments has been described in accounts of several Hopi altars. One of the most remarkable of these is probably the stone called the Hokona mana, or Butterfly virgin, which is used in the construction of the Antelope altar at Walpi. Two flat rectangular stones stand back of the sand picture of the Antelope priesthood in the Snake rites at Shumopovi, while the use of similar stones in the various Flute altars may be seen by consulting articles on these rites. Of a similar nature, no doubt, is the painted stone slab shown in plate XLVI, found in a grave at the Chevlon ruin. This objeet, which ismuch larger than any of those which have been mentioned, is painted FEWKES] STONE SLABS FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 105 on both sides with highly suggestive designs of a symbolic nature. The decoration on one side is almost wholly obliterated, but on one corner we detect clearly the modern symbols of the dragon fly. The pigments with which this stone is painted were easily washed off, and this accounts for the loss of the decoration on the surface which was uppermost as it lay in the grave over the body. The design on the other face, however, is more distinet. It consists of three triangular figures inclosed in a border, recalling a sand mosaic such as is used in modern presentations of the Hopi ritual. Two colors, black and white, are readily detected in the border— the black outside the white. The field inclosed by this border is yel- low, and the three triangular figures are black, with inclosed ree- tangles, which are white. At the apex of each triangle there is a rude figure of a bird painted red, in which the head, body, and two tail feathers are well differentiated. The whole character of the design on this stone calls to mind the decorations on the walls of a kiva of a cliff dwelling of the Mesa Verde, described by Nordenskiéld, and figured in his beautiful memoir. In the designs on the kiva wall of ‘‘ruin 9” we find groups of three triangles arranged around the whole estufa at intervals on the upper margin of a dado, and each of these triangles is sur- rounded by a row of dots. The field on which they are painted is yellow, and the triangles and dots are red or reddish brown. Onawall of Spruce Tree house Nordenskiéld found a similar dado with tri- angular designs, and it is interesting to note that in the figure of this ornamentation which he gives rude drawings of birds appear in close proximity to the triangles. The interpretation of these figures must be more or less hypothet- ical. The custom of ornamenting house walls with a series of trian- gles on the upper margin of a dado is still observed in the modern Hopi villages, where, however, the position of the triangular designs is reversed as compared with that of those on this stone slab. The triangle is a symbol of the moth or butterfly, which, while appropriate on women’s blankets or house walls, would hardly appear to have special significance on the slab in question. Still, as has been pointed out, one of the most venerated objects on the Antelope altar has the figure of a butterfly upon it. Much more likely is it that these three triangular figures sur- mounted by birds are rain-cloud symbols, and that this slab of stone was formerly used in a ceremonial which had for its object rain making, and to this conclusion the dragon-fly symbols on the reverse side also point. This stone is an altar slab with rain-cloud symbols. In the Cheylon ruin the author found several flat stones, one of considerable size, which were marked with blackened cireles. The largest of these, fully 3 feet square, was not brought to Wash- ington, and the photograph which was made of it soon after it was 106 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [ETH. ANN, 22 removed from the grave was a failure. These circles, apparently made by smoke, are of unknown origin and use. On the largest stone they are arranged in two rows, four in each row, the peripheries touch- ing. The stones were inverted when found, and occurred in the cem- etery at Chevlon only. Many graves at Cheylon and Homolobi were, as has been stated, indicated by upright stones or flat slabs of rock. As the digging went below the surface if was sometimes found that the skeleton was covered by a similar flat rock, and in a limited number of cases these rocks were perforated. The holes were sometimes not larger than a broom handle, often capacious enough to permit the insertion of the arm, and in one instance a foot or more across. Oval, round, and rectangular orifices were found, and in several cases a considerable amount of labor must have been expended in making them. Slabs with the smaller circular holes were also found in the floor of a room where there was an intermural burial. Explanations more or less fanciful have been suggested for these perforated stones, one of which was that the rock had been placed above the body and the hole in it was for the escape of the soul or breath-body. The slabs were found above the bodies of several deceased Homolobeans, and the modern Hopi interpretation of the perforation is offered for what it is worth. DIsks Small disks were found in all the ruins which were studied, and while these had like forms they were made of various substances, as of stone, pottery, and shell. They are generally circular in form, rarely perforated, and often ground on their edges. The unperforated speci- mens are supposed to have been formerly used to cover a hole in a jar in much the same way as similar fragments are now used in flower-pots. The perforated specimens were probably used in much the same way as wooden disks are employed in modern pueblos, as parts of drills for perforating stones, shells, or other hard substances. The specimens of this problematic group of objects, and the localities from which they were gathered, are mentioned in the appended list. Number Locality and material 158056 Chaves pass; stone 157706 Chaves pass; red pottery 158079 Chaves pass; red pottery 158078 Cheyvlon; red pottery 158080 Cheylon; red pottery 157963 Cheylon; stone 156480 Homolobi; pottery 157965 Kisakobi; pottery 158093 Little Colorado ruins 158164 Jeditoh; shell 158165 Jeditoh; shell 158060 Chaves pass; galena 158095 Chevlon; wood ye ee FEWKES] OBJECTS FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 10 FETISHES The number of graves in which smooth, waterworn stones, quartz crystals, and fossil cephalopods occur in other ruins has been noted in the account of Awatobi and Sikyatki. A considerable number of these objects were found in the Little Colorado ruins; the fossils included a tooth and remains of several crinoids and of an ammonite. Similar objects are still used in Hopi ceremonies, and it is well to call attention to the fact that some of the priests begged the author to give them these ancient objects that they might use them in the preparation of medicine and in other sacred or ceremonial ways. Some of the smooth stones may have been used in polishing pottery, but this can hardly be said of the quartz erystals and the botryoidal specimens. Fossil cephalopods, called koaitcoko, although very common in the rock strata underlying the modern pueblos, are sometimes looked upon by the Hopis with great reverence, and are used in several mod- ern ceremonies. One of the best-known instances is in the tiponi of the Lalakonti, described in an account of the unwrapping of that palladium, as follows:@ The chief priestesses and Kwatcakwa then untied the bundles upon the altar. They first unwrapped the buckskin thong which bound one of them and took from the top a large number of sticks of different lengths, to each of which numerous feathers were tied. In the midst of these sticks there was an ear of popcorn sur- rounded by a mat made of eight black feather-sticks tied together. This mat, surrounding the corn, rested upon a cloth. Removing this cloth from the cradle, there appeared below it a nicely folded piece of buckskin painted on the border, with the rain-cloud ornaments painted black, the falling rain being represented by fringes. Within this skin there were many breath-feathers anda single reed,? to which feathers were tied. Below the buckskin there were many bean and melon seeds. Within the bundle of breath-feathers there was a fossil shell, frag- ments of another, and the pinon branch. The basket itself, which forms the cradle, was made of a continuous coil of wickerwork, rectangular in shape. When the priestess had undone this bundle, the contents of which were consid- ered so sacred that we were not allowed to touch them, she carefully repacked it. She first put in the seeds of beans, corn, and melons, and then a number of breath- feathers. She sprinkled these with metallic iron dust [micaceous hematite] and added a pinon branch (pine needle). On these she placed the cloth in which the fossil shell was tied and the reed with its feathers. Above this she tied around the ear of corn the old prayer-sticks, to which she added a new one which she had prepared. The black sticks were said to be old men and the seeds to be food. The fossils, which are called koaitcoko,¢ were found later to be one of the numer- ous cephalopod fossils abundant in certain places. It was said that these sacred specimens came up from the under world. The contents of each bundle were sub- stantially the same. Tt will be seen from this quotation from a description written in 1892 that one of the most sacred objects in the bundles before the reredos a The Lalakonti; A Tusayan Ceremony, in the American Anthropologist, v. 5, p. 121, April, 1892. > This resembled the so-called reed cigarettes used in other ceremonies. e The same name was given for the whole bundle. 108 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS [BTH. ANN. 22 of the Lalakonti altar was a fossil cephalopod, which, so far as could be judged, was of the same species as some of those taken from the Little Colorado ruins in 1896 and from Sikyatki in 1895. The ceremonial use of fetish stones in modern Hopi rites has been described by the author in several publications, from which the fol- lowing quotation” is taken as one of the most complete: Saliko brought from her house six ears of corn, a crenellate vessel [medicine bowl], and another bag of fetishes. * * * Saliko took a handful of meal from a tray at the ponya [altar], prayed upon it, and then, kneeling about 4 feet in front of the altar, sprinkled intersecting lines. She placed the crenellate vessel in the center, and then arranged ears of corn upon the lines, beginning at the northwest, where she placed a yellow ear, followed by a blue, red, white, black, and an ear of sweet corn, as shown in the diagram. From her bag she took out six smooth waterworn pebbles, the largest of which was 14 inches by three- fourths of an inch in size, and placed them close beside the ears of corn. Begin- ning at the yellow ear, she laid down by it a piece of opaque quartz with a smoky iron streak; at the blue, a piece of the same with a faint bluish tinge; at the red, a piece with a reddish tinge; at the white, a piece of translucent quartz; at the black, a piece of shining black iron ore, and at the last, a crystal of bluish quartz. Less detailed is the author’s description of the use of these rock erystals in another Hopi ceremony:? The priest, Ametola, first made a bed of fine field sand on the floor, and then rapidly traced on the sand three cross-lines of meal, corresponding to the six primary directions. Over their junction he placed a medicine bowl, but not that before the altar. Around the bowl he laid, at the ends of the lines of meal, six ears of corn, with points directed toward the bowl. Beside each ear of corn he placed an aspergill and a rock crystal. Within the bowl he dropped several rock crystals and a little honey. In the Naacnaiya, or New-fire ceremony, smooth pebbles and quartz crystals likewise play important parts in making medicine: He placed the first group of six skins upon the meal lines, as indicated in the diagram. He then arranged the ears of corn upon the skins, and close beside them he placed the six pebbles (each haying some requisite peculiarity, but no opportunity offered to examine them closely), and finally another set of six skins was deposited upon the right of those first laid down. Eight songs were sung while he was placing these objects, and during the sing- ing of another group of eight songs the asperser laid the pebbles in the nakwipi [medicine bowl], and then rested the ears on end within it. He then slightly dipped the tail or the distinctively colored end of each bird skin and each feather tip into the water, afterward laying it down in the place from which he had taken it. He also sprinkled pollen in the bowl, and aspersed to the six directions with each ear of corn as he took it out and laid it in its former place. The song was an hour and a half long, and just as it closed the asperser took from one of the chief’s bags a quartz crystal. Sucking it, he passed it to a young man sitting near, stitching a kilt, who went up the ladder and_ reflected a ray of sunlight into the nakwipi, and afterward the crystal was put into the liquid. ¢ In the Niman Katcina (festival celebrating the departure of the katcinas) we find these crystals and medicine stones likewise used a American Anthropologist, v. 5, p. 221, July, 1892. > American Anthropologist, v. 5, p. 117, April, 1892. e Journal of American Folklore e, V. 5, p. 192-193. FEWKES] FETISHES FROM LITTLE COLORADO RUINS 109 in mixing the charm liquid, as the author has elsewhere described as follows: ¢ Upon the ears of corn were then laid the nakwiowa, small quartz crystals, elongated, black, pipestem bodies and shell beads. One or two of these were placed on the end of each ear of corn at a point nearest the nakwipi, one behind the other. Two similar quartz crystals were placed in the nakwipi. These sacred stones were laid on the corn in the same order as above mentioned for the ears of corn and aspergills. Intiwa’s assistant then took a quartz crystal, one of the nakwiowa, and, standing on the lower round of the ladder leading out of the kiya, held it in the direct rays of the sun and threw the reflection into the water contained in the nakwipi. This ceremony, by which a ray of light from the sun (Dawa) is introduced, was observed in silence. . . . After several strains of this and other similar songs had been sung, Intiwa’s associate took up the ear of corn on the north side of the bowl, held its end over the nakwipi, and, pouring water (liquid) from a small spherical gourd upon it, washed off the medicine stones into the nakwipi with great solemnity. . . . After the washing of these stones into the liquid, a song with quicker time and more rapid motion of the rattles was taken up and continued for some minutes. The above quotations from descriptions of ceremonies, and others which might be mentioned, show how often small waterworn pebbles, or quartz erystals, are used in making charm liquid or ‘‘ medicine” by the modern Hopi Indians, and the same kind of stones discovered in ancient graves probably had a similar use among the ancients. Indeed, one of the quartz crystals from a grave was appropriated for his altar by a Shumopovi priest. The use of two small stone cylinders, one of lava (number 157984) and the other of a light gray stone (number 157983) each having a pit or depression in the end, is problematic. Similar shaped stones are sometimes used in modern Hopi ceremonies to indicate the zenith. Among the fetishes found in Homolobi graves may be mentioned a rude bird made of unburnt clay,’ the only specimen of animal effigy which was found in all the excavations in 1896. On the surface of one of the mounds of the smaller ruin at Chaves pass, however, the author picked up a small imitation of some unknown animal, which was rudely carved, and reminded him of the so-called ‘hunting stones,” or fetishes, of the Zunis. The occurrence of rude effigies of animals in prehistoric Arizonian graves may possibly be interpreted as substitutional sacrifices, and if this interpretation is correct, it would seem that in ancient times birds, which are now represented by effigies, were sacrificed. It is much more likely, however, that these images represent animals which the ancient worshipers desired, and that they were forms of prayer by signatures. Small figurines of domestic animals are made for this purpose at the present day by the Hopi priests. aJournal of American Ethnology and Archeology, v. 2, 1892, p. 75, 76, 77. bThis effigy is very unlike the burnt clay imitations of birds which have been described in the author’s account of the ruin Awatobi. It is very rudely made, simply pressed into shaped by the fingers, and is without decoration. The Awatobi clay birds are probably used as pendants, while that found at Homolobi appears to be simply a mortuary offering. 110 TWO SUMMERS’ WORK IN PUEBLO RUINS (ETH. ANN. 22 TIUMAN CRANTA A particularly fine collection of crania was obtained in 1896 from Chevilon and Chaves pass. One specimen from the latter place had the facial and frontal bones stained green. ANIMAL REMAINS Although the prehistoric Pueblos of Arizona and New Mexico appar- ently had no sheep, horses, or cattle, they domesticated several ani- mals, and used many more for food. The bones of these animals occur both in houses and graves—more abundantly in the former, especially in the Homolobi ruins, where the author made a consider- able collection of them. They have been identified by Mr F. A. Lucas, of the National Museum, and are as follows: Canis familiaris, domesticated dog; a cranium of the broad-skulled Eskimo type. Canis frustror, coyote; probably jaw and leg bones. Felis concolor, puma; jaw of young. Lynx rufus, wild cat; jaw. Taxidea berlandieri, badger; two claws. Cariacus macrotis, mule deer; leg bones, antlers, and part of jaw. Antilocapra americanus, antelope; leg bones, part of jaw, and horns. Castor canadensis, beaver; collar bone. Lepus texianus griseus, jack rabbit (many specimens). Lepus arizonae minor, small rabbit (many specimens). Cynomys, prairie dog; skull and odd bones. Ovis canadensis, mountain sheep. Spermophilus, ground squirrel; tooth. Thomomys, gopher; skull. © Corvus corax sinuatus, raven; wing bone. Bubo virginianus, great horned owl; tarsus. Aquila chrysaetos, golden eagle; claw. Buteo borealis, red-tailed hawk; wing bones. Cathartes aura, turkey buzzard; wing bones. Meleagris gallopavo mexicana, turkey (many specimens—some of young). Grus mexicanus, sandhill crane; wing bones. Anas sp., duck; part of sternum. Phalacrocorax sp., cormorant; 1 bone. MISCELLANEOUS OBJECTS The manner of building the roofs and floors in the Homolobi ruins was practically the same as in the modern Tusayan pueblos. ; t j ‘ . 1 7 ¥ : ras y eat Si y 5 zs xe é H ‘ = be 7 13 : we A im sit * mi ‘/ ty ‘ « : ae 4 q Am > = VNOZINV ‘44VLSO9VIS YVSN ‘SSAVO SMNVL ASMYNL Al “1d LYOd3Y IWNNNV¥Y GNOOSS-ALNAML ADOIONHLS NVOINSWY 30 NV3YHNE YNOZIY¥vV ‘SdVLSOVIS YVAN SAVO JO YOIESILNI Z we or A “1d LYOd3Y IWONNY GNOOSS-ALNSML ADOIONHLS NVOINSWY JO NVSYHNS Th: “- Heh Ve Z ire _ satel” re 7 ~: a of ae hens , © i be 8 bie ~ : a Me: “x12 oie Panel : Bs aa oe Ast | emt 3°91 .* VNOZIY¥V ‘SSVLSDV14 YVAN SAVO SO HYOIYSLNI IA “Id 1L8YOd3Y 1VNNNV GNOOSS-ALNSML ASOIONHL|S NVOINAWV 3O NVv3yng VNOZIYV “Y3AIN OGVYO1O0 4TLLIN ‘Stiv4 WOvdg ‘vy dNOYD ‘WadVLIO S3HL WOYS MBIA HA “Id LHYOd3Y IVANNVY QNOOSS-ALNAIML ASOIONHL]A NVOINSWY 4O Nv3auN|G VNOZINV ‘HSAIN OGVHYO100 37LLIT ‘SiT1v4 MOWId ‘Vv dNOHYHdS ‘9D NINY WA “Wd LYOd3SY IWNNNY GNOO3S-ALNSML ADSOTIONHLS NVOINSWY JO NVvVaYHNa VWNOZIYV ‘YSAIY OGVYO100 37TLLIN ‘Stqv4 yovia ‘vy dnoud ‘f GNV H SNINY XI “Td 1LYOd3yY 1IVNNNY GNOO3S-ALNSML ADOIONHLS NVOINSWY JO NVaYNG ; » ane as Ms - a ems , rie it 1a, e hee eer |i 7 - ay Ro 7 ‘ =~, 4] VYNOZIYV “YSAIY OGVYOIOO 47L1I7 ‘SIqv43 MOVIE ‘v dnoud ‘fr NIAY ee X Td LYOdSYH TVWANNY GNOOSS-ALNIML ASOIONHL] NVDINSWY 4O NV3YHNE <5 » — 4 Ol oe € ’ of ‘ t i y v ‘ ' ‘ ‘ Un a . i mr a 8 Veet ~ ae Pe t rae L - ‘ : D4 eee 2 . on oi rhe. ; a » ’ ion a a = ha be Sta re VYNOZIYWY YSAIY OGVYOI100 31LL1IN ‘Siva NOVI ‘Vv dNnoUYdD ‘fr NINY IX “Id 1LYOd3Y TVWNNNY GNOO3S-ALNSML ASOIONHLS NVOINSWY 4O NV3YNA TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. XII BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY LITTLE COLORADO RIVER, ARIZONA BLACK FALLS, GROUP B, RUIN A, VNOZIYV ‘YSAIN OGVYO1O0 37LLI0 ‘ST1v4 MOvI1d ‘a dNOYD ‘v NINY ‘a NOILOZS Miaka XG te >. ae a ce = > 9 se ins IX “Id LHOd3Ye IWANNY QNOO3SS-ALNSML ASOIONHL] NVOINBWY JO Nw3aHNd BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. XIV RUIN A, GROUP B, BLACK FALLS, LITTLE COLORADO RIVER, ARIZONA " ore oe ee Wigi'r - a y VL eileen : : ; 4 ° ’ a iv : rt is =v | ‘ : 4 ‘BUREAU OF AMERIGAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LI a (NUMBER (57784, DIAMETER 10% INCHES ) b( NUMBER 157818, DIAMETER 9% INCHES ) FOOD BOWLS FROM SHUMOPAVI, ARIZONA VNOZIYV ‘SO184Nd IdOH LV¥ AYSLAW3S0 NYSGOWN {1 Id LYOd3Y IVANNY GNOO3S-ALNSML ASOIONHL] NYOINSWY 30 Nv3HNs es vi rt, Antal aat hi ? if ti a ay ia a Py, | On "i sr, BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LIII PLAN OF KINTIEL RUIN, ARIZONA A, altar; B, barn; C, cemetary; G, gateway; H, modern houses; M, mounds; §, spring; T, trees. a - : - : > al i pt A 7 ce = r 2 7 5 a : * s ‘ a ! y - cr - — i 4 A x i oe : Sans ( - NOILWAVOX3 3YO338 ‘VNOZIYV ‘NINY JATIN-YUNO4S LY SGNNOW 34O 30VvsHNS AI “1d LYOd3Y IVWNNNY GNOO3S-ALNSML ASOIONHL]A NVOINSAWY 4O NV3AHNE BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. Lv a(NUMBER 17 > I 177534, DIAMETER 9 INCHES ) FOOD BOWLS FROM EPLEYS RUIN, GILA VALLEY, ARIZONA i BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-~SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL.LVI ’( NUMBER 177231, DIAMETER 944 !INCHES ) FOOD BOWLS FROM FOUR-MILE RUIN, ARIZONA VYNOZIYV ‘NINY ATIW-YNOS LV SNOILVWAVOX4 HAT “Id LYOd3Y IWONNNVY GNOO3SS-ALNIML ADOTIONHL]A NVOINSWV 4O NV3SYHNd i , i rr v4 : Ho io i . « : " . ‘ ‘ 4 4 § " 2 . BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LVIII PLAN OF A ROOM IN FOUR-MILE RUIN, ARIZONA F, fireplace; H, holes; P, posts; S, shrine. BUREA SUREAU NOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNU a (NUMBER 177048, DIAMETER 6 INCHES) 6 (NUMBER 177099, DIAMETER 8 INCHES) VASE AND FOOD BOWL FROM FOUR-MILE RUIN, ARIZONA BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LXI FOOD BOWLS FROM FOUR-MILE RUIN, ARIZONA BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LXII b VASES FROM FOUR-MILE RUIN, ARIZONA ¢ BUREALY OF AMERICAN ETHNOL > fe VYNOZI¥yv ‘NI9Y 3TIW-YNO4 WOYS SSNOLS WOOT GNV av1S SNOLS GaLvy¥Osyad AX1 “1d LHYOd3Y TVWNNNY GNOOSS-ALNSML ADSOTONHL|A NVOINAWY 4O NV3yHNG ee TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LXVI BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY Jose Canar x _ San PLAN OF BUENA VISTA RUIN, UPPER GILA VALLEY, ARIZONA A, modern adobe buildings; C.H., central house; D, depression; E, excavations; M, mounds; R, reservoir; Tisptnees. BUREAU ETHNOLOGY FOOD BOWL O, GILA VALLEY, AR IZONA BUREAU OF AME AN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL VASE FROM PUEBLO VIEJO, UPPER GILA VALLEY, ARIZONA NUMBER 177521, DIAMETER 7 INCHES NUMBER 177536, DIAMETER 4% INCH b( NUMBER 177520, DIAMETER 3% INCHES) (NUMBER 177558, DIAMETER 9% INCHES) FOOD BOWLS AND VASES FROM PUEBLO VIEJO UPPER GILA VALLEY, ARIZONA TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL.LXIX Brack Gviazeo BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LXX e& Brack - co, Wut WuHite & BLack. ESAs Daal (Oo HAVES PASS | | | SIKYATK| "TUSAYAN. KINTIEL. © “as RZ 7 ai M\\ »S Four Mire j Mz wy 9 Tas ROLY “Mf Ol DALE. i iy WI My, MG “ale & ‘ayyie cs gyre yes Gini “Aimunvgge> (0) (0) (6) © © PuceioVieyo. MAP SHOWING DISTRIBUTION OF ANCIENT POTTERY IN ARIZONA MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS. BY CYRUS THOMAS =a 197 CONTENTS Page IPretatonynote mess: = =e ae eins nae eae See Se ee ee ee Sek 203 initialisenesiot Mayanamscriptions= —-— see aa. = ee ee eee 203 Secondary numeral series of the Quirigua inscriptions ____________________ 226 Marya chronolomiGalisyStemee ae eee ee eee oe ee ee ee eee 234 her Calkehiqnelicalend anme=sc: same a eee le ee ee Se ene 275 Mavannethodiotcalculationer= see ee= eee yea ee se ee eee ee 282 Signification of the numeral series ______ RES As ede ee A 290 IMSGripiionkaceNcalurn kane ys Calan eee ee ee ee ee 299 INSCHIptlOnrOniSLelal Ga ©O pales ee ee ee ee ee See ee 301 The nephrite stone of the Leyden Museum_-_-_-_-_---__---------------------- 302 Galendarandimnumiber, tables gess sn sane eee a eee ee ee eee cee ee 303 - 199 PuaTE LXXI. LXXIl. LXXITl. LXXIV. LXXYV. LXXVI. LXXVII. LXXVIII. LXXIX. LXxXxX. LXXXI. LXXXiII. FIGURE 123. 124, 125. 126. p HaAceMmumMera ssiOn4 ee we eee 8 a 2 eer eee 128. 129. 130. 131. 132. 133. 134. 135. 136. 137. 138. 139. 140. 141. 142. 148. 127 ILLUSTRATIONS Inscription on the west side of Stela F, Quirigua. Mandslay, TOY hg naa 0) EN sp .6) Ue eee eR a ester ce Seem eae eo ne Inscription on the west side of Stela E, Quirigua. Maudslay, aT Gel DLA LO pxekcR eee Seer ee = ee eee Inscription on the east side of Stela F, Quirigua. Maudslay, parte 2 plate sky. en ee eek eet Ree ee Un ee ok me Inscription on the back of Stela J, Quirigua. Manudslay, Darth pla teexli vile c= = eee eee ee See ee Be Inscription on the east side of Stela A, Quirigua. Manudslay, pactelllplatonvln sep sock ene ns ee ee ee ie Part of inscription on Stela D, Copan. Manudslay, part 2 Datel Xia VA eee Skee, Sees eee ee eek ie SERA RST Part of inscription on Stela D, Copan. Metadstay, part 2, OED OER gM lm Si ere kf eee ae ee ae ee gee Inscription on the east side of Stela E, Quirigua. Maudslay, Pam tple sep lace exXskex Nese Se ee aa ep eat ees eee Plate Lx11 of the Dresden codex ______- Se ee eee meyer Part of inscription on ‘‘ Monolithic Animal G’’, Quirigua. Maudslay,, part ii2, plate xiv ----2=5---5==2--------- 5 - Face mumeralstorinss se a 4. ee = a Pe ee Hace mumeralM ore imeeto. oat anne ee eee eae eee Mace mumMeralstoriose sen a ss oe sec = oe ee eee a Hace numMeralsOn oe see eck eee Seen Sn oe ee eee Hacemumeralsion G28 == eos, Se eee ee 2 INACONIEMCLAlS LOT pte ta eee a eee Se oe ee ee MACE NU IMEEAlS EEO TS oe ea ee ee ee ee Hacemumerals}oriQ es. ose. totes on gee oe een Se Mace NUMeralssLOre Oise s as eee kaye ee ee ee Macemumieralitor 4 oe} eee ee eee et eae Haccmumeralss lO Gl omen ee eee oe 2 ae Ia ceimum eral Satori Osteen ee a ee See (Ob ve siaayeheaves gle adoyouly Pewee. ees Se ee ee ee Racemumerals; ODA Gate eee oa ee eee Macemumeralsi One Olson esas on etee se eee eee es ee om HACOMUMETSAIS LOL 20 ae 8 sae re ee ee = eee Seer Page 204 208 210 202 FIGURE 144. 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 151. ILLUSTRATIONS Symbolsiforl OS or:fll\comm tas ee ee ee Symbols fordull county O37 20 ee eee el ee Part of inscription on the east side of Stela C, Quirigua. Maid slaryay pan telills) pllsihejxcter, =e ieee ae ese eee Part of inscription on the west side of Stela C, Quirigua. Mad slay ena l6ll ol arte) cxiiexe ee ate en pen Symbol for 13 cycles. Maudslay, part 10, plate Lxxvy, glyph G5 ie ate Ee oo meter ee ee ee VaR ee Fg Se FLY DELO AGG UI eral a ae ee ee Part of inscription on the east side of Stela P, Copan _____- Part of inscription on the east side of Stela P, Copan. Maudslay, partr4s plate uxexcxix ee oe ee eee . Glyph 33, west side of Stela F, Quirigua. Mandslay, part 12, Platewb == = soi ee ee ao . Part of inscription on the east side of Stela F, Quirigua. Mand slave) pattilte sp) ete: xsl eee en . Part of inscription on the west side of Stela E, Quirigua. Maudslay, part 12, plate xxx1_____- RR fos tee ya Se . Part of inscription on the west side of Stela E, Quirigua. Maudslay,: pan til\2 sp) ate sXexcxl ee eee 6. Part of inscription on the west side of Stela E, Quirigua. Maudslay,sparbal2. plate sexs = 5) se eee . Inscription at Xcalumkin, Yucatan. From a photograph by Maniler 25%. 2-2 2 oo eee ee Je en 8. Part of inscription on the west side of Stela N, Copan. Manudslay. parti. plateptxexcxes = es = eae eee . Lower division of plate L1x, Dresden codex _______________- . Great cycle symbols. Goodman, page 83____..___________- . Comb-like symbols for 20. Goodman, page 83________.___- by pesioL heey Glels yam DO lees ee eee 3. Column from plate xii, Dresden codex_____._______.____. . Centerpieces of great cycle symbols__........_-_________-- 3. Two symbols from a Chichen-Itza inscription_____________- . Inscription on Stela 6, Copan. From photograph by Saville_ . Inscription on the nephrite stone in the Leyden Museum__-- —_—— eee eeEE————E——EeEEE MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS. I By Cyrus THOMAS PREFATORY NOTE When the paper entitled Mayan Calendar Systems, published in the Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnol- ogy, was written, the parts of Maudslay’s work”? relating to the ruins at Quirigua had not been received, and hence these important ruins could not then be considered, except so far as they were referred to by Goodman.’ As these parts of Maudslay’s work are now at hand, it is my purpose to supplement my previous paper by some notes on the inscriptions at Quirigua, and to discuss points omitted or but lightly touched in it. One of the points but briefly noticed is the value of the different face numerals. As was stated, the determina- tion of the value of these symbols necessitated a careful comparison of the series of the various inscriptions in which they are used, especially the initial series. This examination has been made, and the results are now given. INITIAL SERIES OF MAYAN INSCRIPTIONS The first inscription to which attention is called is that on the west side of Stela F. This is shown in the photograph (plate XxXxtTx) and the drawing (plate XL) in part 12 of Maudslay’s Archaeology, volume 2, and in our plate LXxI. In regard to it Mr Goodman remarks as follows: Initial date: 54-9-14-13-4«17—12 Caban-5 Kayab. The period numbers here are expressed by face numerals. Following this date are fifteen indeterminable glyphs. They do not include the usual initial directive series, but they probably serve the same or a similar purpose, for we can distinguish a number of period symbols with accompanying numerals, though unable to determine their meaning here. Then comes a reckoning which reads, reversing the order of periods for convenience, as I shall do in all cases when necessary: 13-99, from 12 Caban-5 Kayab, the initial date, to 6 Cimi-4 Tzec. The first, or initial, time series, 54-9-14-13-4-17, 12 Caban 5 Kayab, is, as has been explained in my preceding paper, to be interpreted as «Maudslay, A. P. Biologia Centrali-Americana: Archeology. London, 1889-1902. bGoodman, J.T. Archaic Maya inscriptions (appendix to the preceding). London, 1897. 5 203 204 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 follows: Fifty-fourth great cycle, 9 cycles, 14 katuns, 13 ahaus, 4 chuens, and 17 days, to 12 Caban 5 Kayab, counting forward from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, the first day of the fifty-fourth great cycle, as Good- man has numbered these supposed time periods. It is proper, however, to mention at the outset that the terms ‘‘ great eycle,” ‘‘eyele,” ‘“‘katun,” ‘‘ahau,” and ‘‘chuen” are used merely for convenience in comparisons with Goodman’s renderings, and that I do not accept them as appropriate, or in any way adopt his theory that they denote real time periods, because I believe them to be nothing more than the orders of units in Mayan numeration; nor must it be understood that I accept his theory of a separate Mayan chronologic system. As the application of these terms has been fully explained in my previous paper, it is only necessary to restate here their numer- ical value: IV GHIOTIG So. seek oe eee ee 20 days (120) Ay eu ee Se Sse ye ee ee 360 days (1820) i katonl= 2228 5 US a eee 7,200 days (182020) li CY ClON as =- 2 Ee SO eee 144, 000 days (182020 20) The great cycle as given by Goodman equals 1,872,000 days or 18x 20 20 2013, but should, as I shall endeavor to show, be counted as equal to 2,888,000 days, or 18x 20x 20x20x20. The number 54 standing in the great-cycle place in the above series (54—-9-14-13-4-17) is to be considered as having no numerical value; it is not to be read “54 great eyeles,” but ‘the fifty-fourth great cycle” (according to Goodman’s method of numbering these supposed time periods), while the other numerals, 9, 14, ete., are to be used as true numbers— that is, 9 eyeles, 14 katuns, 13 ahaus, 4 chuens, 17 days—the 54 being entirely omitted from the calculation. The sum of the series will therefore be as follows, the day being the unit: 9 cycles (each 144,000) _____- 1, 296, 000 days (920202018) 14 katuns (each 7,200) -__._- 100, 800 days (14202018) 13 ahaus (each 360) -...---.- 4,680 days (132018) 4 chuens (each 20) ___.-__--- 80 days (420) Wi. GayS\> tees ee Soe ee 17 days Sum of the series _____- 1,401,577 days After the initial series the next number-series (reversed), 13-99, or 15 ahaus, 9 chuens, and 9 days, is found in the compound glyph num- bered 16 in Maudslay’s drawing, the numbering of which has been retained in our plate LXxt. The date which follows—6 Cimi 4 Tzee— is found in the right-hand portion of glyph 18 and the left-hand portion of glyph 19. As all the numbers of the initial series, including that attached to the month and day forming the terminal date, are face characters, and are considerably worn and dim, the question arises, How did Goodman ascertain their number value? Although some of these characters are so dim and imperfect that BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL, LXXI nig to me sea) wi \ ; —— Uer 2) INSCRIPTION ON THE WEST SIDE OF STELA F, QUIRIGUA MAUDSLAY, PART 12, PLATE XL THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF QUIRIGUA INSCRIPTIONS 205 their details can not be traced with certainty, I-will overlook this for the present and will try to get the data necessary to determine their value. Let us suppose at first that the number value of no one of them has been ascertained. The first step will be to count back from the date following the next numeral series, in which the numbers are of the ordinary type. Although the symbol interpreted Tzee is too much worn to be determined from the photograph, I accept the drawing, which seems to indicate this month, as the artist had an opportunity of inspecting the cast. The date will therefore be 6 Cimi+ Tzec. The preceding number series is 15-9-9, or 15 ahaus, 9 chuens, 9 days, and equals 4,869 days. By counting back from 6 Cimi 4 Tzee (year 1 Akbal) we reach 12 Caban 5 Kayab (year 15 Ben), the concluding date of the initial series as given by Goodman. This, if the month symbol of the second date has been correctly interpreted Tzec, gives us the value of the number symbols attached to the first date, 12 Caban 5 Kayab (glyphs 6 and 7, plate Lxxt). Although these glyphs, as seen inthe photograph, are scarcely distinct enough to be used in comparison, they are more clearly shown in the drawing, and present some characteristics which will assist us, especially that one (glyph 7) denoting 5, attached to the month symbol, where the superfix is a form of the ordinary ahau symbol. As neither of these is repeated in the initial series, they afford us no aid in determining other face numerals of the series. It may be well, before proceeding farther with our examination of the series, to ascertain what data are necessary to determine the num- bers of the time periods in an initial series, and this can best be done by examples. Here we have, supposedly, as the initial date, 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu (year 8 Ben), the first day of Goodman’s fifty-fourth great eycle; and 12 Caban 5 Kayab is the coneluding date of the series. That these two items are not sufficient to determine the intermediate time periods will be admitted without question. Let us suppose, as a means of further test, that the numbers of chuens and days, ‘‘4 chuens 17 days,” given by Goodman, are correct. That 9 cycles, 14 katuns, 13 ahaus, 4 chuens, and 17 days, when counted forward from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, will bring us to 12 Caban 5 Kayab, as is maintained by Goodman, is true, as may easily be seen by mak- ing the ecaleulation. Days 9 cycles 2 pt a he. OF De ao ee 1, 296, 000 14 katuns 1 are bat eee a ene : 100, 800 LS lan ais yx ee eg es Oe ce ee 4, 680 Ax CATIONS tee nee en EL: Oy re yet gt = eae P SH 80 17 days - = ine aS efeie ee ae Az 17 Total tee eee eae ae. fae eee Bea 8 Sea Se tAOIS ot Subtract 73 calendar rounds ____________________- _.. 1,885,540 Remainder seen a tee A wet 16, 037 206 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 Subtracting from this remainder the 17 days which remain in the year 8 Ben, after 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, and dividing the remainder by 365, we obtain 43 years 16 months and 5 days. Counting forward this length of time aye the manner explained in my previous paper) from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, year 8 Ben, brings us to 12 Caban 5 Kayab, year 13 Ben.¢ The ‘‘calendar round” is, as has been explained in my previous paper, the term Goodman applies to the 52-year cycle, at the end of which period, counting from any point, the same date as that from which we count returns. The casting out of these calendar rounds, each of which amounts to 18,980 days, does not affect the result, as counting the remainder from the initial to the terminal date will give precisely the same result as counting the entire sum of the series— except that to determine the lapse of time, the number of years covered by the calendar rounds cast out must be added. For example, in ease of the above-mentioned series, as 73 calendar rounds were cast out, 73x52 years must be added to the result obtained by dividing the remainder by 365, in order to ascertain the real lapse of time from the initial to the terminal date. Having the date 12 Caban 5 Kayab and (supposed) the 4 chuens (or months) and 17 days, we turn to my condensed calendar or to Goodman’s ‘‘ Archaic Annual Calendar,” and search through the tables of years until we find the year in which 12 Caban is the 5th day of the month Kayab. This in Goodman’s tables is found to be the 51st year, or, in my table, the year 13 Ben. Counting back on the table of this year 4 months and 17 days, we reach 6 Ahau, the 8th day of the month Ceh, which, according to Goodman’s scheme, will be the first day of an ahau. Turning now to Goodman’s ‘Archaic Chronological Calendar” and to his 54th great cycle, we hunt for the place where 6 Ahau is the 8th day of the month Ceh. We find this in the 9th cyele, 14th katun, and looking at the column at the left margin we ascertain that it is the 13th ahau, which agrees exactly with the initial series as given above (54-9-14-15-4-17). This seems to be confirmatory; however, before accepting it as con- elusive let us examine a little further. Without any change, or sup- posed change, from the date and numbers of chuens and days used in the preceding calculation, we look farther in Goodman’s ‘** Archaic Chronological Calendar” to see if 6 Ahau 8 Ceh can be found else- where, confining our examination to his 54th great cycle. We do find it in the 13th ecyele, 4th katun, 17th ahau, which gives the series 54-13-4-17-4-17.. Remembering that the 13th eyele, according to his scheme, is the first cycle of his great cycle, and must, therefore, be omitted from the caleulation, and counting forward 4 katuns, 17 ahaus, 4 chuens, and 17 days from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, the first day of the great cycle, we a For condensed feoen ane fanle of years see the end of this paper. THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF QUIRIGUA INSCRIPTIONS 207 reach 12 Caban 5 Kayab, the required date, as with the preceding series. Looking farther we find 6 Ahau 8 Ceh in the 2d cycle, 12th katun, 6th ahau, giving the series 54-2-12-6-4-17, which also carries us to the proper date (12 Caban 5 Kayab). The date 6 Ahau 8 Ceh is also found in the 4th cyele, 19th katun, 15th ahau, and other places in the 54th great cycle, each of which gives the proper result. But this is not all, as we also find 6 Ahau 8 Ceh in the 53d great cycle in the Ist eyele, 7th katun, and 12th ahau, giving the series 53-1—7-12- +17, which, counted from 4 Ahau 8 Zotz, the first day of the 53d great cycle, brings us to 12 Caban 5 Kayab, the required date. Other series which will give the proper result might be noted, but these will suffice to show that the initial and terminal dates and the chuens and days do not afford sufficient data by which to determine the series. It is necessary, therefore, to know the numbers attached to one or more of the other time periods of the series, and these must be ascer- tained in every instance by inspection and by a previously obtained knowledge of the value of one or more of the face numerals. Referring again to the initial series under consideration—54-9-14— 15-4-17, 12 Caban 5 Kayab—and holding to our assumption that the number of the chuens and days is correct, the date being satisfac- torily determined, we proceed to learn what additional data are neces- sary to determine the series. If inspection and a knowledge of the face numbers prove the one attached to the cycle in this instance to be 9, then the series as given above is the only one that will agree with the data, and we are thus enabled to determine the value of the face numerals attached to the katun and ahau symbols; and should that giving the number of days be imperfect or obliterated, it would still be possible to determine the series, as the date with the other items mentioned (number of chuens and cycles) is always sufficient to fix the other numbers in the series. If the number attached to the chuens be unknown, then the series could not be determined with the other data mentioned. Suppose the number (9 in this case) attached to the cycle symbol to be imperfect or unknown, but that attached to the katun (14 in this instance) to be known, the series given above is the only one that will agree with the data. If the numbers attached to the cycle and katun be indeterminable, but that attached to the ahau symbol (13 in this instance) be known, the series can still be determined, and will be as given. It is apparent, therefore, that, with the initial and ter- minal dates and chuens and days known, the number attached to one of the other elements in the series is necessary in order to determine the series. It is also demonstrable that with these data the series can be at once determined by Goodman’s tables, though this, as I shall show, does not prove that his theory of the Mayan time system or his method of numbering the cycles or great cycles is correct. 208 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS (ETH. ANN, 22 Continuing our investigation of the data necessary to determine the series, still referring to the one under consideration, we will next sup- pose that the number of chuens can not be determined by inspection. The terminal date being given—l2 Caban 5 Kayab (which falls in a Ben year)—it is readily seen, by reference to Goodman’s ‘‘Archaie Annual Calendar,” 51st year, or to my condensed calendar, that it requires 17 days, counting back, to reach an Ahau which falls on the Sth day of the month (Goodman begins the count with 20 Eb, but this gives Ben as the Ist day of the month, and the result is the same), hence the Ahau to be used depends on the number of chuens—if 0 chuens 17 days, it will be—as seen by the table referred to—s Ahau S Pax; if 1 chuen 17 days, then 1 Ahau 8 Muan; if 2-17, then7 Ahau 8 Kankin; if 3-17, then 13 Ahau 8 Mae; if 4-17, then 6 Ahau 8 Ceh; if 5-17, then 12 Ahau 8 Zae; if 6-17, then 5 Ahau 8 Yax; if 7-17, then 11 Ahau 8 Chen; if 8-17, then 4 Ahau 8 Mol; if 9-17, then10 Ahau 8 Yaxkin; if 10-17, then 3 Ahau 8 Xul; if 11-17, then 9 Ahau 8 Tzec; if 12-17, then 2 Ahau 8 Zotz; if 13-17, then 8 Ahau 8 Zip; if 14-17, then 1 Ahau 8 Uo; if 15-17, then 7 Ahau 8 Pop; if 16-17, then 9 Ahau § Cumhu; if 17-17, then 2 Ahau 8 Kayab. The fact that Ahau is the 8th day of the month in each case greatly limits the range of possibilities. Suppose that, in addition to the terminal date, the numbers of cycles and katuns are also known (!) and 14 in this instance); the series can be definitely determined, and will be as given above. If the numbers of eyeles (9) and ahaus (13) are known and the number of katuns is unknown, the series ‘‘54—9-14-13-4-17” will give the correct date, but there is one other—53—)-13-13-15-17—which will also give the correct date, 12 Caban 5 Kayab. In this case the correct deter- mination of the series depends on the initial day of the great cycle, to which attention will be called farther on. We next take the case where, in addition to the dates and the number of days, the numbers of katuns and ahaus are known, and the number of cyeles is unknown. In the series under consideration the number of katuns is 14, of ahaus 13. These data are sufficient to determine the series, and in this instance the result is as given above. The next inquiry relates to the data necessary to determine the ter- minal date where this can not be recognized by inspection, or where that given is erroneous. Where neither the day nor the day of the month is known, it is necessary to have the entire numeral series— that is, 54-9-14-13-4-17, in the example we have been using—in order to determine the date. If the day of the terminal date of the series can be ascertained by inspection, then the date can be determined without knowing the number of days; thus 54-9-14-13-4—?, ? Caban ? (month) will be sufficient to ascertain that this terminal date is 12 Caban 5 Kayab. Turning to Goodman’s ‘ Archaic Chronological Calendar,” 54th great eycle, 9th eyele, 14th katun, 13th ahau, we find NUAL REPORT PL. LXxXil Y-SECOND AN TWENT OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY REAU BU INSCRIPTION ON THE WEST SIDE OF STELA E, QUIRIGUA —————— a i THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF QUIRIGUA INSCRIPTIONS 209 6 Ahau 8 Ceh. Searching through his ‘‘ Archaic Annual Calendar” we find that 6 Ahau8 Ceh occurs only in the 51st year, and that Caban is the 5th day of the month in this year. Counting forward 4 months from Ceh brings us to Kayab, where 12 Caban is the 5th day. We thus ascertain that 12 Caban 5 Kayab is the date sought. If the number of days, the name of the day of the terminal date, the month, and day of the month be unknown—thus in our example d4—-9-14-15-4-?, 12 (day) ? (month)—it is possible to limit the result to one of two days, in this case to 12 Kan 12 Pax, or 12 Caban 5 Kayab. In the first case, the number of days will be 4, and in the second 17. If the number of chuens and the day and month of the date be unknown, but the number of the day and the day of the month known, the date can be determined. There are occasional side aids which may be taken advantage of in the investigation of the face numerals. One example which we will notice, bearing on the series which has been under consideration (initial series 54-9-14-13-4-17, west side Stela F, Quirigua), is as follows: The initial series on the west side of Stela E, Quirigua (plate LXXII), is, ordinary numerals being used throughout, and all distinet, 54-9-14-12-4-17, 12 Caban 5 Cayab. This is identical with the other series, except that there are only 12 ahaus, while in the other there are 13. Although all that is positively known in regard to the first series (so far as our present investigation has extended) is the initial and terminal dates, the number of the days, and the day of the month on which the Ahau falls, we also know that the series as given above will agree with these items. If the 12 ahaus in the second series given above should, in fact, be 13, there will be perfect agreement with that on the west side of Stela F. It is evident from what has been shown above that, with all the items of the series save one being known, that item can be determined although wholly obliterated or incorrect. Enough is given to show that, counting back 4 months and 17 days from 12 Caban 5 Kayab, we reach 6 Ahau 8 Ceh. By calculation, or by referring to Goodman’s ‘*‘Archaic Chronological Calendar,” 54th great cycle, 9th cycle, and 14th katun, it is seen that 6 Ahau 8 Ceh can only be in the 15th ahau, and is not found in the same cycle and katun in either the 55rd or 55th great cycle. The question as to whether Goodman’s tables cover the range of the initial series will be considered farther on, when we have investigated more series. However, the fact that the series on the west side of Stela E, when the number of ahaus has thus been corrected (as calculation also shows 12 to be wrong), agrees p: ecisely with the rendering given of that on the west side of Stela F is not proof that this rendering is correct, it only adds a degree of probability, supposing that Goodman has based his determination on an examination of the face characters. The fact may be noted, also, that some two or three other inscriptions 22, era—04——14 210 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 at this place, where the numerals are of the ordinary form, commence with 9 eycles. As the numbers in the inscription on the east side of Stela E are all of the ordinary form, nothing in regard to the face numerals can be learned from it. The numbers in the initial series on the east side of Stela F (plate LXXII1) are all face characters, including those attached to the termi- nal date. Goodman interprets them as follows: ‘‘54—-9-16-10-18-20, 1 Ahau 5 Zip.” As will be seen by reference to my former paper, the 18 chuens 20 days are to be understood and counted as 0 chuens 0 days, and we shall hereafter write them so. Goodman omits, prob- ably by printer’s mistake, the 9 cycles, but the other numbers which he gives make them necessary. As none of the numbers in this case correspond with any on the west side of the same Stela, excepting the 9 cycles, the glyph for which is too nearly obliterated for determination, we gain nothing by comparison; and nothing can be learned from other inscriptions of this locality which present no face numerals; these are passed over without notice. Turning to plate XLIV in part 12 of Maudslay’s work we find draw- ings of the inscriptions on the ‘‘ Monolithic Animal G.” As the numerals in the initial series are face characters, with the exception of that attached to the month of the terminal date, and have not been noticed by Goodman in his work, I call attention to them (figure 123). As the cycle in most of the initial series at Quirigua appears to be numbered 9, we will assume that to be the number in this case. But this is not a mere assumption without any other basis, as the glyph is not inconsistent with that on the west side of Stela F and agrees with the type given (see figure 132) in having the circle of dots on the cheek. Although this does not amount to demonstration, it renders the interpretation highly probable. Having determined the cyele our examination is very much restricted. However, as we know as yet no way of determining the great cycle by an inspection of the symbol, our examination must extend to the three given by Goodman. But without other data the examination on this line is vain. Examining the series, we notice that the face glyph attached to the katun symbol immediately under the eyele is partially obliterated and as yet is unknown. Passing to the upper pair in the next group to the right hand, we notice that the numeral resembles somewhat closely that attached to the month (glyph 7) of the terminal date in the inscription on the west side of Stela F (plate LXx1), which was found to denote 5. The symbol on the monolith differs in having the skeleton jaw, which Goodman says denotes 10, though we have not as yet found the proof of this, and we therefore assume that it denotes 15 (10+-5) (see figure 1380). The hand on the face immediately below, which is attached to the chuen glyph, as also on the glyph INSCRIPTION ON THE EAST SIDE OF STELA F, QUIRIGUA aN z THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF QUIRIGUA INSCRIPTIONS al attached to the symbol for days in the upper pair of the group to the right, denotes, according to Goodman, full count or 20 when days and 18 when chuens (see figure 143). However, I consider it, as heretofore stated, a symbol for naught. Immediately below the latter is the day (probably Ahau) of the terminal date, with the face symbol for 5, already determined, prefixed (figure 128a). The first glyph of the lower pair of the group to the right has the ordinary character for 3 prefixed. This we take to be the month symbol, though it is unusual and indeter- minable by inspection. The series, there- fore, so far as made out, is as follows: 54?-9-?-15-0-0, 5 Ahau 3 (month). It is evident that the 5 Ahau of this series must be the beginning day of an ahau, as there are neither chuens or days, and hence it should be found in Goodman’s ‘‘Archaie Chronological Calendar.” Turning to this publication, we find that 5 Ahau 3 (month) can occur as the beginning of the 15th ahau in the 9th cyele in the following places only— 53d great cycle, Ith eyele, 17th katun; 54th great cycle, Yth eyele, 4th and 17th katuns. In the first it falls in the month Pop, in the second in Yaxkin, and in the third in Muan. As the month symbol, so far as if remains, does not admit of interpretation as the first or second of these, we conclude that it must stand for the third if the date is within the range of Goodman’s calendar. This gives as the series 54—-9-17-15-0-0, 5 Ahau 3 Muan, which works out correctly by calculation. The ‘“‘full count” or ‘‘naught” symbols require some discrimination in our attempts to interpret them. In a series given by Goodman, as 54-9-17-15-18-20, or 54-13- 20-20-18-20, 18 and 20, being so-called ‘‘full counts,” should in every instance be counted as naught, and the cipher (0) should be in- troduced in their place; and this is true in every case where the symbols are used to represent prefixed numbers, except in one place. Where they are used to denote the day of the month, as 5 Eb 20 Zotz, they denote 20, but there are special characters used for this C2T DILL “MNSLUNE) 4) [BULIUY OMAILOUOPL ,, WO WOTYMLAIOSUT Jo Juv “AITX 07K ‘BT Qaud ‘Av[spneyy 212 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 purpose, as is shown in figure 145. It appears probable also that the hand across the jaw in the face-forms of the cycle and great cycle is to be interpreted as indicating the use of 20 as a multiple, though in face-forms of prefixed numbers it undoubtedly signifies naught. Goodman is possibly right in insisting that these are not absolutely naught symbols, as is our 0, but are used to indicate that the count in the given denomination is complete and has been carried into the next higher denomination. Nevertheless they are—with the exceptions mentioned—equivalent to naught and must be so considered and used in calculating time and numeral series. Fic. 125. Face nu- Fig. 124. Face numerals for 1. meral for 2. Fic. 126. Face numerals for 3. a oO <“s/ s( d 7 a Fic. 128. Face numerals for 5. Fig. 129. Face numerals for 6. Fig. 130. Face numerals for 7 Fic. 131. Face numerals for 8. I insert here, in figures 124 to 145 inclusive, the types of face numerals selected by Goodman from the inscriptions. I have found them to be correct, with some two or three exceptions in regard to which there is considerable doubt; these will be noticed in the proper connection. Some additional examples will appear as we proceed. The next inscription of this locality to which attention is called is that on Stela J (see Maudslay’s drawing, part 12, plate XLVI, our plate LXXIv). All the numbers of the initial series except that of the day of the month in the terminal date are face characters. The series - THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF QUIRIGUA INSCRIPTIONS 213 as given by Goodman is as follows: ?-9-16-5-0-0, 8 Ahau 8 Zotz. The number of the great cycle is omitted, though it is necessarily 54 according to his system. He says there are no other reckonings in the inseription, but this is a mistake, as there are two more numeral series, each followed by a distinct date. These, however, afford no assistance in determining the initial day, as they do not connect with it; moreover, a large number of glyphs intervene. All the evidence bearing on the value of the face numerals in this instance may be stated as follows: the symbol connected with the eyele, interpreted 9, shows the distinguishing features of the others Fic. 132. Face numerals for 9. Fig. 134. Face nu- a dD c d e meral for 11. Fic. 135. Face numerals for 12 Fig. 136. Face numerals for 13. noticed which are interpreted 9. This, taken in connection with the fact that most of the inscriptions of this locality begin the initial series with 9, renders the interpretation probable. We have as yet no evidence that 16 is the correct rendering of the character attached to the katun glyph, Goodman’s example (figure 159b) being the very symbol found here; but the 5 attached to the ahau glyph agrees with that determined from the inscription on the west side of Stela F, and therefore may be accepted as correct. The face number attached to the day (Ahau) of the terminal date, which is interpreted 8, is as 214 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 yet undetermined in our investigation; it is ¢ of our figure 131. The day of the month and the month (8 Zotz) are distinet and easily recog- nized, the number being of the usual form. In regard to the chuen and day symbols, all we can say is that the hand across the face which appears to indieate full count (18 and ZJ 20) or naught (0) is seen in each of the attached 2 ( glyphs. Assuming this to be correct, it follows that I Sot the date 8 Ahau 8 Zotz must be the first day of a 5th seer a ete ras avhau. meral for 14. a 5 ~ A . ™ Turning in Goodman’s Archaic Chronological Cal- endar to the 9th cyele of the 53d great cycle, we find that 8 Ahau 8 Zotz is not the beginning of any 45th Ahau in this cyele nor in the 9th eyele of the 55th great cycle, but is the begin- ning of the 5th ahau of the 16th katun in the 9th cyele of the 54th great cycle. Even omit- ting the number of the day Ahau we can reach the same result from the data given, and that result only. The evidence therefore appears to be sufficient. This gives one example of the face character for 16 (see figure 139 Db). As to F1G. 138. Face numerals the value and reliability of Goodman’s tables pes in the respect noticed I will speak hereafter; at present I as- sume them to be reliable, and I may state here that they may be accepted, so far as our present tests are coneerned, as correct in regard to the relation of the several time periods up to and including the ecyele without, however, accepting his theory in regard to the great eyele or the number of eyeles forming one of these great periods. Fic. 139. Face numerals for 16 We must therefore accept as determined with reasonable certainty the value of the following face numerals: that on Stela J (glyph 1, Maudslay’s plate XLVI, our plate LXXIV) pre- fixed to the eyele glyph, in- terpreted 9; that (glyph 5) affixed to the katun glyph, interpreted 16; that (glyph 5) Fic. 140, prefixed to the ahau glyph, interpreted 5; those (glyphs 7 and 9) prefixed to the chuen and day elyphs, interpreted full count or naught; and that (glyph 11) prefixed to the day of the terminal date (Ahau, in this instance), interpreted 8. One distinguishing characteristic of the symbol for 9 is the circle of Face numerals for 17. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LXXIV INSCRIPTION ON THE BACK OF STELA J, QUIRIGUA MAUDSLAY. PART 12, PLATE XLVI THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF QUIRIGUA INSCRIPTIONS 21K) dots on the cheek (figure 132); two characteristics of the symbol for 16 are the skeleton jaw and the hatchet in the eye (figure 139); those of the symbol for 5 are the ahau symbol on the head and the absence of the skeleton jaw (figure 128); that of the symbol for full count or naught is the hand across the face or lower jaw (figure 143); those of Fic. 141. Face numerals for 18. the symbol for 8 do not appear to be well defined—Goodman says they are the lobed ear ornament projecting on the cheek and the foim of the forehead ornament, but neither of these appears to be exceptional. It should be stated that by counting forward in each of the given examples from the initial date (4 Ahau 8 Cumhu) the number of days indicated by the numeral series we will reach the terminal date. Our next reference is to the inscription on Stela A, Quirigua, the drawing of which is given in plate vu, part 11 of volume H, Maudslay’s Archaeology (our plate LXXxv). In this instance the numerals attached to the cycle, katun, and ahau, and the month Fie. 142. Face numerals for 19. of the terminal date of the initial series are of the ordinary form, and those attached to the chuen, day and the day of the terminal date are either face forms or unusual forms. The series as given by Goodman is 54-9-17-5-0-0, 6 Ahau 13 Kayab, which is certainly correct, as the data given are sufficient, as has been shown, to determine the series. It agrees with Goodman’s tables and also with calculation. Giza 4 jn, = — @) 7 Fig. 143. Face numerals for 20. By this we ascertain that the unusual numerals (glyphs 4 and 5) prefixed to the chuen and day symbols, each of which consists of a scroll above, a hand in the middle, and a bean-shaped character below, denote naught (figure 144, number 7). The face numeral prefixed to the day Ahau (figure 129) resembles that denoting 16 (see figure 216 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS (ETH. ANN. 22 139 b, c), excepting that it is without the skeleton jaw, thus appar- ently confirming Goodman’s statement that this characteristic has the value of 10. In figure 144 are shown some forms of the symbols for naught (0). Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in some of the types are of frequent occurrence in the inscriptions, as are also numbers 7 and 8. Fia. 144. Symbols for 0, or full count. Numbers 9 and 10, which show the hand across the lower jaw, also represent a common type. Number 12 has been found only in the inscription on the Palace steps, Palenque. Number 11 is from Mono- lithic Animal B, Quirigua, and numbers 13 and 14 are from Stela D, BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LXXV ES G ( ( 9 INSCRIPTION ON THE EAST SIDE OF STELA A, QUIRIGUA MAUDSLAY, PART 11, PLATE VII THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF QUIRIGUA INSCRIPTIONS oa Copan. The small figures of number 15 are from the Dresden codex, and represent a common type; the slight variations in detail are numerous and appear to have no significance. In figure 145 are shown thesymbols forfull count, or 20, not shown in figures 143 or 144. A,b,c,andd are more or less common in all the codices; e is from the Dresden codex; tig, h, and 7 are from the left slab, Tablet of the Cross, Palenque. c d e The inscription on the east side of Stela C presents some particu- lars worthy of notice (see figure 146). Fic. 146. Part of inscription on the east side of Stela C, Quirigua. Maudslay, part 11, plate x1x. The prefix to the cyele sym- bol is 15 in the ordinary form; those to the katun, ahau, and day are of the coil and hand form, above described as indicating full count, or, in other words, naught; that tothe chuen is of the usual form for full count in the inscriptions (see number 3, figure 144). The date is 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu with ordinary numer- als. Therefore the series, according to Goodman’s method of writing, will be ?-13-20-20-18-20, 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, which is as he gives it, excepting that he places it in his fifty-fourth great eycle. Our method of writing if would be 55-13-0-0-0-0, 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu. I give 53 as the great cycle, accord- ing to Goodman’s method of number- ing these periods, as by counting back 13 eyeles, or 1,872,000 days, from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu we reach 4 Ahau 8 Zotz, the first day of his fifty-third great eyele. His remark in regard to it is: ““This date is the beginning of the fifty- fourth great cyele.” As he interprets the great cycle 54, he virtually makes the series 54-0-0-0-0-0. It must be borne in mind, as will be seen by ref- erence to my former paper, that instead of counting 20 cycles to the great cycle, following the vigesimal system, which I believe to be correct, he counts 13. However, this 218 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 subject will again be referred to. At any rate, we find further con- firmation of the signification of the number symbol—the combined coil, hand, and bean shaped character—in this inscription. The inseription on the west side of Stela C (figure 147 «) is inter- preted by Goodman as follows: 9-1-0-0-0, 6 Ahau 13 Yaxkin, the number of the great cycle being omitted. As the numerals attached to the cyele, katun,and day and month of the terminal date are of the usual form, and the symbols for full count, or naught, attached to the ahau and month glyphs are of the usual type, we have sufficient data to determine the face character attached to the day glyph. Omitting from consideration the number attached to the day symbol and counting back from 6 Ahau 15 Yaxkin, year 4 Lamat, (TERT TERT Marans OES (Se: Fig. 147. Part of inscription on the west side of Stela C, Quirigua. Maudslay, part 11, plate x1x. 9 eyeles and 1 katun, or 1,503,200 days, according to the method given in my former paper, we reach + Ahau 8 Cumhu, the first day of the fifty-fourth great eyele. Turning to Goodman’s Archaic Chronological Calendar, to the ninth cyele of the fifty-fourth great cycle, we find that 6 Ahau 13 Yaxkin is the first day of the first katun. Thus it is seen that both the tables and calculation agree with the interpreta- tion of the series. By this we have a further confirmation of the THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF PALENQUE INSCRIPTIONS 219 £ interpretation full count (or properly 0) of the face numeral with the hand over the lower jaw. It may be mentioned here that Maudslay agrees with me in designating these so-called ‘‘full counts” as given by Goodman as ‘‘ no count,” or, in other words, naught (see his text, part 11, page 9). Referring to inscriptions in other localities, the following facts are noted in reference to the value of the different face numerals: the initial series of the Foliated Cross at Palenque (see figure 2, previous paper) appears to be as follows: 54-1-18-5-4+-0 to 1 Ahau 13 Mae. Follow- ing this date, after some intervening glyphs, is the brief numeral series 14 chuens 19 days, immediately after which comes the date 1 Cauac 7 Yax. Counting back 14 chuens 19 days from the latter date, we reach 1 Ahau 13 Mae, the terminal date of the initial series. This gives the value 1 to the face glyph attached to the Ahau symbol. This face glyph (figure 1246) agrees in its features, excepting the ear pendant, with the face glyph attached to the eycle symbol (figure 124 a), show- ing it to be 1, which agrees with the above interpretation. As the face glyph attached to the ahau period symbol agrees with the symbol we have heretofore interpreted 5 (see figure 128a@); and the number attached to the month symbol is of the ordinary form; and that attached to the day glyph has the hand across the lower jaw, we have the following numbers of the series: ?—1—?-5-?-0, 1 Ahau 13 Mae. These items are not sufficient to give the remaining numbers of the series; but assuming that it falls in the 54th great cycle, as is most probable, the other numbers will be as given above. As the face character attached to the chuen symbol, interpreted 4 (figure 127 b), presents some features of the one interpreted 4 on the west side of Stela F at Quirigua (left part of glyph 4, plate LXxT), and this will suffice to determine the other numbers, we are perhaps justified in concluding that the series is given correctly. That the face character attached to the katun symbol (figure 155), which is interpreted 18, is some number greater than 10 is shown by the skeleton jaw. Turning to the inscription of the Temple of the Sun, as shown in Maudslay’s plate LXXxIx, part 10 (see plate xi, Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, 1900), where the num- bers of the initial series are all face characters except those designat- ing the day of the month in the terminal date, we will try to determine them from the data so far obtained. As those attached to the cycle (figure 124c¢), katun (figure 141¢c), and ahau (figure 1286) symbols are evidently the same as those in the inscription of the Foliated Cross, and the day of the terminal date is ? Cimi 19 Ceh, we have the following items of the series: ?—-1—-18—5—?—?, ? Cimi 19 Ceh. These data are not sufficient to determine the remaining numbers. One other item is necessary for this purpose. Assuming the great eycle to be that commencing with the day 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, the 220 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 so-called 54th, the remaining numbers may be determined thus: Cimi may be the 19th day of the month only in the years in which Ahau is the 15th day of the month. By turning to Goodman’s ‘‘Archaie Chronological Calendar,” 54th great cyele, eyele 1 and katun 18, we see that the 5th ahau begins with the day 12 Ahau 13 Chen. Turning to his ‘‘Archaie Annual Calendar,” we find that 12 Ahau 13 Chen falls in the year he numbers 34 (equivalent to the year 9 Lamat in my condensed calendar). Cimi is the 19th day of the month in this year, but the month can not be determined until the day number attached to Cimi is ascertained. As the face numeral attached to the chuen symbol in the inscription is without the skeleton jaw we infer that it does not exceed 9, and as it has none of the signs of full count or naught it can not be 0. As Cimi comes 6 days after Ahau, then we must count forward in the table of the year 34 until we reach the 19th day of the month Ceh. This count we find to be 3 months and 6 days, and the number attached to Cimi is 13. There- fore the entire series is 54-1—-18—5-3-6, to 13 Cimi 19 Ceh, which is as it is given by Goodman. The weak point in this solution is the assumption of the 54th great eyele. Even without this, we can, by a range of nine trials, determine that no other numbers than those given can be found within the scope of Goodman’s three great cycles (53d, 54th, and 55th), but this, though strengthening the conclusion, is not absolute demonstration, as the objection to his method of counting the cycles, hereafter noticed, and the uncertainty as to the scope of his tables, come into the problem. As will be seen later, the only certainty in regard to the tables of his ‘‘Archaie Chronological Calendar” is the order.y and correct succession of dates and periods and the fact that 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu is the first day of a great cycle. Assuming for the present that the series has been correctly deter- mined, we gain evidence as to the value of two additional face numer- als, 3 (figure 126a) and 6 (figure 129). Goodman’s interpretation of the initial inscription of the Tablet of the Cross, which is 53-12-19-15-4-0, 8 Ahau 18 Tzee, is not satisfaec- tory. The face numeral attached to the cycle symbol, which he interprets 12 (figure 135 a) has, as a superfix, a figure very much like the superfix to the face character which he has correctly interpreted 5 (as is shown by the evidence I have presented) (figure 128q@). In his representation of face numerals no one save those denoting 5 or 15 have a superfix of this kind, excepting one for 12, and that one is the character of this inscription (figure 135a). Moreover, it lacks the skeleton jaw, which is true of some others above 10 as given by him. As has been shown in my previous paper, where this inscrip- tion is discussed at length, and as is admitted by Goodman, there is no connection between the terminal date of the initial series and any of the dates which follow, if the numeral series which intervene be taken as given in the inscription. THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF PALENQUE INSCRIPTIONS 221 In addition to the suggestions offered by Goodman and those pre- sented in my previous paper in regard to correcting the manifest error somewhere in these series, the following is added as a possible solution: Change the terminal date of the initial series from 8 Ahau 18 Tzec to 1 Ahau 8 Muan, and the following numeral series will then connect the succeeding dates with it, and the 1 Ahau 18 Zotz will come 1-8-0 (1 ahau 8 chuens) or 520 days after the terminal date of the initial series, instead of being placed back of it as Goodman’s correction requires. This, however, will slightly change the initial series from the numbers given by Goodman. By referring to the inscription as given in Maudslay’s drawing, we notice at Cd the symbol for 13 eyeles (figure 148). As this is not connected with a series, and follows immediately py¢ 14s, symbol for after the date 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, we are justified in 15 cycles. Mauds- interpreting it as an indication that up to this point pean 13 eyeles have been passed over from the initial date of the inscription, which must be 4 Ahau 8 Zotz. The calculation is correct. Subtracting the series 8-5-0 (1D 2C) from 13 cycles the remainder is 12—19-11-13-0. 13-0-0-0-0 8-5-0 12-19-11-13-0 If this correction be justified the initial series will be 55-12-19-11- 13-0, 1 Ahau 8 Muan, which will fit into Goodman’s tables. The chief objection to this is that it compels us to assume that the aboriginal artist made a mistake in his caleulation, as the month symbol is clearly Tzee and the face numeral shows the skeleton jaw, indicating that the number as given is above 10. However, we must admit that the error has not, as yet, been satisfactorily explained, and conse- quently the value of but two of the face numerals—those attached to the eyele and katun glyphs—can be determined by the inscription. Twelve (see figure 135a) for the cycle and 19 (figure 142a) for the katun, as given by Goodman, must apparently be accepted on any theory as to the correction. It will be observed tht the symbol attached to the ahau glyph, which Goodman interprets 15 (figure 136 d), is widely different from any of the other symbols for 13 given by him, as is seen by reference to our figure 136, which is a copy of the examples given by him on page 49 of his work. So far, therefore, as comparison shows, it may as well be interpreted 11 as 15; but, in fact, is more like 19 (see figure 142) than either. Nor can his inter- pretation (4) of the character attached to the chuen symbol be clearly sustained by comparison, though it must be conceded that it does not resemble the determined types of 13. The initial series on Stela D of the Copan inseriptions-(Maudslay, plate XLVI, part 2, our plates LXXvI and LXXvir) is peculiar in 222 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 having the usual face characters replaced by full forms. The cycle symbol (glyph 1) is composed of a human figure (the numeral) and a bird apparently of the parrot species (the cycle); the katun (glyph 2) of the human form (the numeral) and a bird of a rapacious species (the katun); the ahau (glyph 3) of the human form (the numeral) and a nondescript animal (the ahau); the chuen (glyph 4) of a human form (the numeral) and a frog-like animal (the chuen); the day (glyph 5) of two human forms, that to the right with the monkey- like face turned backward (the day); the day of the date (glyph 6) (presumably Ahau) of a human form (the numeral) with a cartouch inclosing another form (the Ahau); the month of the date (glyph 13, plate LXXvi1) of a human form (the numeral) and a full-formed leaf- nosed bat (the month). Goodman’s interpretation of the series is as follows: 54—-9-5—5-0-0, 4 Ahau 13 Zotz. The dots on the chin of the human face of the eyele symbol (plate LXXvI, glyph 1) and other characteristics prob- ably justify us in interpreting it as 9. The hand across the lower jaw in the chuen symbol (plate LXXvI, glyph +) and day symbol (plate LXxv1, glyph 5) indicate full count or naught (0). But Goodman’s rendering 5 and 5 of the number characters of the katun (plate LXXvVI, glyph 2 and ahau (plate LXXvI, glyph 3) symbols is question- able, as the skeleton jaw denoting 10 is quite distinet in the former and is not present in the latter. The rendering is therefore inconsistent with Goodman’s own statements in regard to the characteristics of the face numerals, and must have been reached in some other way than by inspection of the glyphs. If the figures with ahau symbols on the head are face numerals, and this must be admitted, then that of the katun (glyph 2) should be 15, and that of the ahau (glyph 3) should be 5, if Maudslay’s colored drawing is cor- rect. However, it must be admitted that the drawing of the face numeral prefixed to the katun symbol is very doubtful. In figure 149 is given a drawing of the head alone, made from Maudslay’s plate XLIV, which is the autotype of the same inscription. This inscription is the most interesting one in some respects that has been found in Mayan ruins. Entire bodies, instead of conven- tional heads, are given, and though they are to some extent gro- tesque, yet they seem to indicate the aboriginal idea of the origin of these symbols. Maudslay’s happy idea of distinguishing the prefixed numerals from the period symbols (eyele, katun, ete.) by difference in color brings out very clearly the forms and characteristics of the latter symbols. The eyele and katun symbols are both rapacious birds; the former owl-shaped, with a crest; the latter eagle-shaped, with feathers hanging over the front of the head. The ahau symbol is the skeleton form of a nondescript bird-like animal with a large Fie. 149. Type of face numeral. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LXXVI PART OF INSCRIPTION ON STELA D, COPAN MAUDSLAY, PART 2, PLATE XLVIII BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LXXVII a ae 4c Bee ne Z : 2 Weta ; © / ss se : Chen aN Kis n : ye VY S PART OF INSCRIPTION ON STELA D, COPAN MAUDSLAY, PART 2, PLATE XLVIII THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF COPAN INSCRIPTIONS 2293 fang; the chuen glyph is a frog-like animal. The month symbol of the date (glyph 13, plate LXXviI1) is, as stated above, a leaf-nosed bat with a human face. As the name of the latter, Zotz, or ‘‘ Bat,” cor- responds with the form, it is possible that the forms of the other sym- bols have some reference to the names. However, I am unable to point out this reference; though possibly as ‘‘uinal” in Maya sig- nifies ‘‘month” or ‘‘ period of 20 days,” and ‘‘uo” ‘‘ frog,” the sym- bol may have some reference to the name. Be this as it may, it will be seen by reference to figures 165 and 164, showing the types of the ahau and katun symbols, that the face forms retain to a large extent the bird-like features, one of the katun symbols, figure 1640, having the feather fringe over the forehead. We notice also in some of the symbols of both the ahau and katun little patches of cross-hatching, which are feather marks in the full forms of Stela D. These facts are noticed in passing merely to call the attention of students to them as possibly forming some clew to the relation between these symbols and what is represented by them. Attention is called next to the inscription on Stela I, Copan. The numerals attached to the cycle, katun, ahau, and chuen symbols are of the ordinary form; that to the day glyph is of the disk and hand type (figure 144) denoting naught (0); and that to the day (Ahau) of the terminal date, the face charact r with the ahau headpiece denoting 5. Whether the month symbol is distinguishable, or is one of the obliterated glyphs which follow, as Goodman asserts, is doubtful. The series is therefore ?-9-12-3-14-0, 5 Ahau ? (month). Goodman says 54-9-12-3-14-20, 5 Ahau ? (month), leaving the month blank, but adds that we know it must be 8 Uo. The correctness of the last statement may be questioned on the fol- lowing grounds: Taking, in Goodman’s own tables, the 55th great cycle, 9th eyele, 12th katun, and 3d ahau, we find that the first day of this ahau is 11 Ahau 8 Uo; by counting forward 14 months from this date we reach 5 Ahau 8 Pax, a result which calculation shows to be cor- rect, the initial date of this great cycle being 4 Ahau 3 Kankin. The positive determination depends therefore on the proper determination of the great cycle, or of its initial day, for his numbering of these supposed periods, ‘as we shall soon see, is without proper grounds. The initial series of the inscription on the east side of Stela P (figure 150), same locality as the preceding, is given as follows: 54-9—9-10-0-0, 2 Ahau 13 Pop. The numbers attached to the cycle, katun, and ahau are face characters, those attached to the chuen and day symbols are of the type shown in numbers 4, 5, and 6, figure 144, but much abbre- viated, and those of the terminal date are of the ordinary form. The month symbol, which Goodman interprets Pop, is apparently a variation of the usual type. As enough of the prefix to the chuen symbol remains to indicate full count or naught (0), if may be assumed that the prefix to the day symbol, of which there seems to 224 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 be a slight remnant, is the same; therefore the terminal date will be the first day of an ahau. The skeleton jaw in the prefix to the ahau symbol, not well shown in Maudslay’s drawing (plate LXXXIX of his ee Fig. 150. Part of inscription on the east side of Stela P, Copan. work, part 4), but distinet in his photograph, would indicate 10 or some number above 10 (see figure 150). The face numerals of the cycle and katun are evidently the same, and one of them shows quite distinetly THOMAS] INITIAL SERIES OF COPAN INSCRIPTIONS 225 the circle of dots on the cheek, indicating 9 (see figure 132). “There- fore the series so far as satisfactorily made out—assuming the number attached to the day Ahau to be 2—is as follows: ?-9-9-?-0-0, 2 Ahau 13 Pop. This is sufficient to determine the series, and shows the above rendering to be correct. Fic. 151. Part of inscription on the east side of Stela P, Copan. Maudslay, part 4, plate LXXXIXx. Although the drawings in Maudslay’s work are in most cases of unusual excellence, giving details with wonderful accuracy, that of this inscription and the one on altar Q (part 4, plate xXct1) are not up to the usual standard, failing in some instances to bring out as clearly as might be done some of the minor details. There is some 22 ETA—04——18 226 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 doubt as to the value of the face numeral prefixed to the ahau symbol (AQ, figures 150 and 151), as it is unusual, being in some respects unlike any other face numeral that I have observed in the inscrip- tions. Seler (Zeitschrift fiir Ethnologie, Heft 6, 1899, page 722) interprets it 13, and gives as the terminal date 3 Ahau 3 Uayeb. This would make the series, omitting the great cycle, 9-9-13-0-0, 3 Ahau 3 Uayeb; however, the number attached to the month symbol is cer- tainly 13. If this series is counted from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, it will reach 3 Ahau 3 Uayeb in the year 5 Ezanab. The number attached to the day Ahau is very uncertain, seeming more like 1 or 3 than 2; apparently 1. I have therefore given an exact copy of Maudslay’s photograph (figure 151), and a carefully made drawing (figure 150), using Maudslay’s and Seler’s drawings and the photograph (autotype) for this purpose. I am rather inclined to the opinion that Good- man’s rendering is correct. It seems that Seler has been influenced in his determination of the number placed over the Ahau symbol by Maudslay’s drawing. His interpretation is not justified by the photograph, which indicates ‘1 Ahau” instead of ‘*3 Ahau,” making the date 1 Ahau 13 Uo, or 1 Ahau 13 Pop. The whole inscription, as well as the inscription on the front and back of the same monument, is strange, and, as will be noticed far- ther on, shows some of the features of the Chichen Itza inscriptions. It is perhaps unnecessary to follow this subject further, as it is apparent that the value of the face symbol and other numeral sym- bols ean be satisfactorily obtained. It appears that Goodman’s deter- minations, where the data are sufficient, are as a rule correct; though there are a few cases, as has been shown, where his rendering is doubtful, and some where the series given are largely guess work, the data being insufficient. When the number of the great cycle is a necessary factor, another question arises, which will be discussed farther on. Before discussing the numbers of the eyeles and great cycles, which subject was referred to in my previous paper, I will notice some of the secondary numeral series of the Quirigua inscriptions not at hand when my previous paper was written. SECONDARY NUMERAL SERIES OF THE QUIRIGUA INSCRIPTIONS Returning to the inscription on the west side of Stela F (plate LX x1), we pass over the first subordinate series (glyph 16), leading on to 6 Cimi 4 Tzee (glyphs 18 and 19), as this has already been noticed. At glyph 25 follows a date, 3 Ahau 3 Mol, but without any recogniz- able intermediate numeral series, though there are some numbered glyphs. Passing on we find at glyph 29 the date 4 Ahau 13 Yax, and immediately following (glyph 30 and first half of 31) the numeral series 3 days, 13 chuens, 16 ahaus, 1 katun, and following this two a € bo THOMAS] SECONDARY SERIES OF QUIRIGUA INSCRIPTIONS DOK dates, 12 Caban 5 Kayab (the same as the terminal date of the initial series) and 1 Ahau 5 Zip, though the number attached to the day in the latter is not the ordinary symbol if intended for 1 (figure 152). Counting the series given forward from 3 Ahau 3 Mol and 4 Ahau 15 Yax brings us to no given date; nor will counting back from 12 Caban 5 Kayab reach any previous given date. If, however, we count back from 1 Ahau 3 Zip, we reach 12 Caban 5 Kayab, showing that the connection is made with the terminal date of the initial series, as given by Goodman. It would seem from this that the insertion of this date, after this second numeral series, is for the purpose of showing that the count is to be made from F'6. 152. Glyph 33, west side " : “ of Stela F, Quirigua. Mauds- this date, as we found in our preceding paper Jay, part 12, plate xt. to be true in some instances. Our next reference is to the inscription on the east side of Stela F (Maudslay’s plate XL, part 12). Here the initial series (plate LXx1m), as heretofore stated, is 54-9-16-10-0-0, 1 Ahau 3 Zip. Goodman, in his comment (page 125), says: The glyphs that immediately follow are so fantastic and unfamiliar that I can make nothing of them until the sign indicating a date to be some score days in the 19th katun is reached. The date is 5 Ahau 13 Mol [glyph 24]. As that begins the Ist ahan, the number of score days indicated must be 18. Two unin- telligible glyphs follow, succeeded by what I believe to be this reading: 3 cycles, 8 katuns, and 19 ahaus, a reckoning embracing 26 calendar rounds and extending 360 8-score days into the 13th cycle, to 1 Ahau 13 Yax, the beginning of a 360- bissextile count and of a katun also. It is somewhat difficult to understand these statements, but I will try to explain them, as I desire to offer one or two eriticisms. The actual interval between 1 Ahau 3 2a) Zip, the terminal date of the initial ,, series, and 5 Ahau 13 Mol (if the 3 first following occurrence of this date be assumed as the one in- tended) will be 18,360 days, or 2 katuns, 11 ahaus. This will bring us to 5 Ahau 13 Mol, the first day of ahau number 1 in the 19th katun of cycle 9 (as numbered by Good- Fic. 153. Part of inscription on the east side Ian)—the one now under consider- of Stela F, Quirigua. Maudslay, part 12, ation. What he means by 18-score plate XL. days is that the count extends 360 days into the 19th katun, bringing us to the commencement of the second ahau, which, according to his method of numbering, is 1. For some unexplained reason, Goodman makes no mention of the numeral series between the terminal date of the initial series 1 Ahau 228 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS (ETH. ANN, 22 3 Zipand 5 Ahau 13 Mol. This, unless I am wrong in my interpreta- tion, is found in glyphs 21, 22, and 23 (figure 153), as numbered by Maudslay. The prefixed numerals with one exception (that prefixed to the ahau) are of the ordinary type. However, as the exception, which isa face numeral, shows the hand across the lower jaw we must assume, according to what has been shown, that it denotes full count or naught (0). With this assumption, the series appear to be 3 days, 11 chuens, 0 ahaus, and 19 katuns, or —19-O0-11-3, the number of chuens being uncertain; but this series will not connect any pre- ceding with any following date. Could this have been Goodman’s reason for omitting notice of the series? It is noticeable also that the symbol he interprets 45 in the date 5 Ahau 13 Mol (glyph 24, figure 153) is precisely the same as the one he interprets 1 in the date 1 Ahau 5 Zip in the inscription on the west side of this stela (glyph 33). In the next place it is exceedingly doubtful, judging from an inspection of the characters, whether his supposed series “*3 cycles, 8 katuns, and 19 ahaus” can be found in the space indicated—that is between glyphs 24 and 29. There is not in it, with one exception, a single glyph that in any way resembles any of the forms of time periods he has noticed. The exception is the first part of glyph 26, which is like the ordinary form of the chuen symbol; but the character over it is like that over Ahau in the date he gives as 5 Ahau 13 Mol, elsewhere interpreted as 1. There is a numeral, 13, of the ordinary form over the first part of glyph 28, but there is no 15 in the series he gives. We take this series, there- fore, to be purely imaginary, made up from his tables. According to Maudslay’s drawing, the month symbol in the following date—1 Ahau 15 Yax—is really the symbol for Yaxkin. But an examination of the photograph does not bear out the drawing, the glyph being as much like the Yax as the Yaxkin symbol. According to his statement, thisimagined series extends ‘‘ 360 8-score days into the 15th eyele to 1 Ahau 13 Yax.” He must, of course, allude to the 13th eyele of his 55th great cycle; with this understand- ing his count is correct, if he had anything to base it on. We turn next to the inscription on the west side of Stela E, the drawing of which is shown in Maudslay’s plate XXXII, part 12. The terminal date of this initial series (see plate LXXI1), the number of ahaus being corrected from 12 to 13, as already noticed, is 12 Caban 5 Kayab. The first numeral series which follows is in glyphs 14 and 15 (figure 154), and is 6-13-3 (reversed), equal to 2,423 days. The date which follows (glyph 16) is 4 Ahau 13 Yax. The count is correct, as 2,423 days from 12 Caband Kayab, year 13 Ben, bring us to 4 Ahau 13 Yax, year 7 Lamat. The next series is found in glyph 18 and, accord- ing to the method of reading the chuens and days so far followed— that is, counting the number at the left side of the chuen symbol as days and that above it as chuens—is, in reverse order, 1-6-14, but THOMAS] SECONDARY SERIES OF QUIRIGUA INSCRIPTIONS 229 Goodman, without any explanation, changes it here to 1-14-6. The date following (glyphs 19 and 20), is 6 Cimi4 Tzec. The time given in this instance will not reach from one of these dates to the other. As Goodman is certainly right in his correction in this instance, if the date 4 Ahau 13 Yax be correct, we will examine it. The initial series of this inscription, including the terminal date, is, when the correction noted has been made, precisely the same as that of the inscription on the west side of Stela F, and the first following date there is the same as the second here, 6 Cimi 4 Tzec. As the intervening series is too short to allow for ¢ second return of the latter date, it is evident that the numeral series must be the same. 5 year 8 Ben, we reach 9 Imix 9 Mol, year+ Ben. Thisis wrong. Let us use the series as corrected on a previous page, to wit: 4-6-I4-11-3-1, 248 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 or 12,488,821 days. Adding the shorter series and counting forward from + Ahau 8 Cumhu, we reach the date 4 Kan 2 Yaxkin. This again is wrong. Using the larger series as corrected and counting from 9 Kan 12 Kayab we reach, as has already been shown, the cor- rect date, 5 Chicchan 15 Pax. It is therefore fair to conclude that there are no sufficient grounds for Seler’s supposition. These erroneous conclusions arise chiefly from the mistaken idea that these numbers, ahaus, katuns, ete., are real time periods. More- over, it does not necessarily follow, where such high numbers are used, that 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu is what Seler calls the ‘‘normal date”; that is to say, the initial day of Goodman’s 54th great cycle. But this does not matter in the present case, as the date can not be connected with any of the others given in the series. Even could the series be reasonably changed so as to make the con- nection between the given dates, we still have staring us in the face the fact that 9 Kan 12 Kayab is actually and beyond question used in the codex as the initial day of the so-called great cycle in six instances, and that a Kan is the initial date in 3 times 6 other instances. It is true that these so-called great cycles are but orders of units, steps in numeration, and not real time periods; nevertheless, they are just as real when counting from a Kan as from an Ahau. In order that the reader may clearly understand the object in view in introducing these calculations, and see the bearing they have on the question, it is necessary again to refer to the basis of Goodman’s theory of the Mayan time system, and especially of his supposed: separate ‘‘ chronological calendar.” Goodman maintains that in addition to their regular annual eal- endar in which time was counted by years, months, days, ete., the Mayas made use of another time system which he terms the ‘‘chrono- logical calendar.” In this system, according to his theory, they counted time by certain determinate periods, which, according to the nomenclature arbitrarily adopted by him, are termed chuens (each of 20 days); ahaus (each of 18 chuens or 360 days); katuns (each of 20 ahaus or 7,200 days); cycles (each of 20 katuns or 144,000 days); great cycles (each of 13 cycles or 1,872,000 days), and a grand erg equal to 75 great cycles. These he believes to be real time periods, as truly so as the years, etc., of the annual calendar, systematically arranged and all above the chuens always (so far as time count in the inscriptions is concerned) beginning with a day Ahau, the great eycles always with the day 4 Ahau. It is in this supposition that Goodinan’s great error lies, and, in order to support his premise, he changes two of the steps of the Mayan numerai system without the slightest evidence on which to base the change, and he also introduces factors into the numeral system which are wholly unknown to it. If these statements which I make can be maintained by satisfactory evidence, then his theoretic ‘‘Archaic Chronological System” falls to THOMAS] GOODMAN’S ‘‘ARCHAIC CHRONOLOGICAL CALENDAR” 249 the ground, though his discoveries as to the signification of certain glyphs and the manner in which they were used be genuine, and his calculations of series be correct, and though his tables be also correct in the main. The annual calendar system, which is that one long ago explained and accepted (that of months, years, ete.), is not in dispute. It is his theory of another time system, his so-called ‘‘ Chronological Cal- endar,” which I assert is without basis of fact. This calendar, which he says he ‘‘ finally deduced,” he expects will be challenged, but he “leaves it to defend itself, conscious that it is as infallible as the multiplication table.” Before referring to the proof bearing on this subject already pre- sented, we shall call attention again to Goodman’s method of num- bering these periods. The chuens he says were numbered 18, 1, 2, 3, etc., up to 17; the ahaus and katuns were numbered 20, 1, 2, 3, ete., up to 19; the eycles, 13, 1, 2, 3, ete., up to 12; and the great cycles, 73, 1, 2, 3, ete., up to 72. On this subject he remarks as follows: Another consideration which must be constantly borne in mind is that all Maya dates relate to elapsed time. When a date is givenit must be remembered that it is not the beginning of a period yet to run its course, but the beginning of one denoting a period already concluded. The ingenious numeration of their periods was designed to prevent confusion in this regard. The first day, chuen, ahan, katun, cycle, and great cycle is not numerated 1, but 20, 18, 20, 20, 13, 73, as the case may be, denoting that the full round of-the period has run and that this is the commencement of a new count. In other words, these beginning numerals are equivalent to naught or no count, the periods being designated only until after they had fully passed. It is very difficult to keep track of this style of numera- tion—so difficult, in fact, that familiar as I am with it I am distrustful of having made some lapses in these pages. That he has made a mistake in this statement, in order to fit the facts with his theory, and that he carries this mistake throughout his entire work, is easily shown, and will appear from what follows. That the count is forward to some date in the future, as compared with the initial date, in most of the series of the inscriptions, is appar- ent from the examples given by Mr Goodman in his work; and that it is forward to some future date, as compared with the initial day, in every initial series, must be admitted. Therefore, his assertion can not be intended to contradict this fact. What he intends to declare is this, that when a date is given, as the first day of the 2nd katun or ahau, we must understand that it is really the first day of the 3rd katun or ahau, the 2nd being completed; or when 2 ahaus and 3 chuens are mentioned, we are to understand 2 completed ahaus and 3 completed chuens. Let us see if we can ascertain how this strange method of number- ing these so-called periods originated. It must be remembered that this numbering is the consecutive numbering, as that of the days of 250 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 the month, and not the numbering (in the 15 series) of the day Ahau as mentioned above. I quote again from his work (pages 12 and 13): Poor Don Pio! To have the pearl in his grasp and be unaware of its priceless- ness—like so many others! But I must not exult too much yet. The succession of the katuns, reckoned according to this principle, is yet to be ascertained before my fancied discovery can be established by a crucial test. I score the ahaus off in the foregoing order, and, sure enough, the twentieths give the desired result: 11.9, 7,5, 8.1, 12, 10,8, 6,4, 2,13. Eureka! The perturbed spirit of the Maya calendar, which has endeavoured so long to impar¢ its message to the world, may rest at last. But, though confident I had discovered the secret of the ahau and katun count, when I tried the plan on the dates and reckonings of the inscriptions it proved totally inapplicable. There were periods into whose nature I had no insight, and if those I surmised to be ahaus and katuns were really so the former would not come in the right order, while the latter were excessive and numerated in a way quite unintelligible. It was discouraging, but I did not lose faith in my discoy- ery. The inapplicability of the Yucatec scheme to the reckonings of the inscrip- tions, probably, was simply owing to different methods of computing the ahaus and katuns. There was no alternative but a patient and exhaustive analysis of the Archaic dates and time reckonings. It would be tedious as useless to recount trials—failure outranking success a thousand fold—the results of which constitute the bulk of this book. I will only state, in brief, that I determined the character of the chuen and great cycle periods; that I discovered the first chuen was numerated 18, the first ahau, katun, day and day of the month, 20, and that the first cycle of the great cycle was num- bered 13—the unit attaching to the second period in all instances; that I ascer- tained the cycle was composed of twenty katuns, numerated 20, 1, 2,3, etc., up to 19, instead of according to the Yucatec order; that I finally deduced a chronolog- ical calendar whose perfect accord with the principal dates and reckonings throughout the inscriptions is proof of its correctness, and by reversing the process succeeded in reconstructing the outlines of the entire Archaic chronological scheme. I expect my calendar to be challenged. It would be without precedent in the history of discovery if it were not. But I leave it to defend itself, con- scious that it is as infallible as the multiplication table, and knowing that all antagonists must finally go down before it. By reading between the lines of this quotation, and noting the dif- ficulties he encountered, we readily see that his theory was outlined before the difficulties presented themselves. Why should he find it necessary to number the first chuen 18, the first ahau 20, and the first eycle 15 were this not so? Take the short series 13-9-9 from 12 Caban 5 Kayab to 6 Cimi 4 Tzee, which he mentions, and says works out all right. There is no difficulty if we count it 13 ahaus plus 9 chuens plus 9 days, just as we might say 13 hundreds 9 tens and 9. If we read it as it really is, 15 units of the 5rd order (360 each) plus 9 units of the 2nd order (20 each) and 9 units of the 1st order (1 each), there is no difficulty in showing that it is an exact measure of the lapse of time between the given dates. The difficulty, as we may safely assume, arose from the fact that the count would not fit in with the theory he had formulated but had THOMAS] GOODMAN’S ARCHAIC CALENDARS 251 not perfected. He had probably outlined the tables of his ‘‘Archaic Chronological Calendar,” but instead of numbering them as we find them now given in his work, the cycles were numbered 1, 2, 3, ete., up to 15; the katuns, 1, 2, 3, ete., to 20, ete. Conceiving the idea that the numbers in the series (as the 13-9—)) should express the numbers in his scheme—that is to say, should be read the 15th ahau, the 9th chuen, and 9th day—he found that it would not give the correct result. Here indeed was a difficulty, a difficulty of fitting facts to a theory, but not one in reality, for the series taken as it stands works out correctly. In order to overcome this difficulty and at the same time save his theory he seemingly hit upon the ingenious device of a supposed Mayan method of numbering periods somewhat as the surveyor num- bers his stations, beginning with 0 (naught), or what gives the same result and avoids the use of the cypher, which he contends was not used by the Mayas, of bringing forward the last number of the preceding period to be the first of the one following. Thus in his “Archaic Annual Calendar” he has pushed down one step the true dominical days, Akbal, Lamat, Ben, Ezanab, although retaining their proper numbers, and has brought forward, with the number 20 attached, the preceding days, Ik, Manik, Eb, Caban, and begins the numbering of the chuens with 18, of the ahaus and katuns with 20, ete. This, of course, overcomes the difficulty, as what is numbered the first ahau, ete., is, in fact, the second, and in the example given the 13th ahau is, in faet, the 14th, and the 9th chuen the 10th, and hence, by his method of numbering, the 15th ahau, 9th chuen, 9th day is equivalent to 13 complete ahaus, plus 9 complete chuens, plus 9 days. This plan will undoubtedly preserve the proper order of succession. The only real errors it introduces, if considered merely a method of numbering, is in making the wrong days dominicals and in earrying the last day of one month forward to become the first day of the next, one or two examples of which are pointed out in my previous paper. These examples have since been more fully dis- cussed by Mr. Bowditch, with the result of strongly inclining him to accept Goodman’s theory in this respect. They are noted in my Maya Year (figure 20), though not discussed there as to the point here raised. As further evidence bearing on this question, I add the following: There is no such method of numbering found in the inscriptions, or in the codices. Mayan or Mexican, unless in the examples above referred to, and there is no such method mentioned by any of the early writers. Perhaps, however, the most important point to be decided in this connection is the query, Did the Mayas in fact number these so-called periods? How many were to be taken was indicated by symbols, but there is no evidence, so far as I am aware, that they were numbered, except in a single instance found 252 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 on the north and south faces of Stela J at Copan. Here, it is true, we find a succession of ahau symbols of the usual type, placed in somewhat regular order and numbered in regular succession from 1 to 16, beyond which the remaining glyphs (only two, however) are obliterated. Whether these numerals are intended as a successive numbering or intended merely to indicate so many ahaus, is not known; however, it looks like regular numbering, and is so accepted. sut, unfortunately for Goodman’s theory, the series clearly begins with number 1. To get around this difficulty he assumes that it is to be understood that 1 ahau has passed, yet he admits that the symbol on that numbered 1 signifies ‘‘ beginning.” Thus the only example of numbering these so-called periods found in all the records is emphatically against his theory, in order to sustain which he literally begs the question by saying it must be assumed as under- stood that 1 ahau has passed. We are justified, therefore, in regard- ing his scheme of numbering as wholly unnecessary to explain the numeral and time series of the inscriptions, for considering his so-called time periods merely orders of units will give a full explana- tion, so far as the counting is concerned, in every case. But these items do not show all the errors in the above-quoted statement from Goodman’s work. That but 13 cycles were counted to the great cycle, I have shown by mathematical demonstration is untrue, so far, at least, as the Dresden codex is concerned. I have shown that this codex, instead of counting 13 cycles to the great cycle, counts 20, thus following regularly, as would naturally be supposed, the vigesimal system. It is true that Goodman admits that the codices belonging to what he calls the Yueatee group not only count 20 eyeles to the great cycle, but count from some three or four different initial days. This admission, however, does not avail him anything in the way of clearing his theory of the difficulty presented. In the first place, the Dresden codex can not be classed with the so-called Yucatee group. This group, which includes the Troano and Cortesian codices, and the codex used by Landa, makes Kan, Mulue, Ix, and Cauac the dominical days; while the Dresden codex, from which the examples given above showing the use of 20 cycles to the great cycle were taken, follows the system of the inscriptions in using throughout Akbal, Lamat, Ben, and Ezanab as dominical days. Moreover, it gives high series wholly unknown to the Troano and Cortesian codices; and it introduces in some three or four places, as numerical charac- ters, precisely the same symbols as those of the inscriptions named by Goodman katun, ahau, and chuen, and in one or two places uses a face character to represent the ahau. What grounds, therefore, can Goodman have for asserting that the system used in the inseriptions is different from that used in the Dres- den codex, which he evidently includes under the term ‘* Yucatee THOMAS] CALENDAR SYSTEM OF YUCATEC INSCRIPTIONS 253 system”? There is nothing in either the Troano or Cortesian codex by which to determine the number of cycles they count to the great eyele. What system was used in the Yucatan inscriptions is not posi- tively known, but, as is shown below, they probably agreed with the Troano and Cortesian codices. Goodman says he has been unable to find a single Yueatee inscribed date. After careful inquiry and examination of the casts of inscrip- tions in the chief eastern museums and all the photographs, drawings, and figures in reach, without finding one, I have had my attention called by Mr Saville, of the New York Museum of Natural History, to a photograph by Mahler, taken at Xea- lumkin, in Yueatan, which is repro- duced in Le Plongeon’s ‘‘Queen Moo,” which, if I correctly interpret it, may be an indication of the sys- tem used in the Yuecatee inscrip- tions. This is shown in figure 157 from a copy of the photograph kindly furnished by Mr. Saville. The day (A11) is evidently 5 Caban, the 4th day, apparently, of the month Zotz, though the month symbol is somewhat unusual in form. If the day symbol is properly interpreted Caban, of which there can scarcely be a doubt, then, as the 4 dots over the month symbol are very distinct, it is certain (whether we can deter- mine the month symbol or not) that the year must begin with the day Ix, hence the dominical days must be Kan, Mulue, Ix, and Cauae. This is the calendar system of the Troano and Cortesian codices and also of the codex followed by Landa. This result I must confess is con- trary to my expectation and carries back the Yueatee calendar system to the days of the inseriptions. It is true that a single inscribed date is a slender basis on which to reach a decision, but we must accept it until other evidence on the point is forthcoming. Goodman suggests that the Cocomes, Xius, Chels, and Itzas had each their own ‘‘ chronological system, using a Fig. 157. Inscription at Xcalumkin, Yu- catan. From a photograph by Mahler. 254 common calendar.’ MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 ’ On what he bases this opinion, which is equiva- lent to saying they had different numeral systems, Iam not aware. That the system in vogue at Tikal (in the Itza region of the Peten district) was the same as that of the inscriptions at Palenque, Copan, and Quirigua is well known. Let us return to the exceptional series of the Copan inscriptions Fig. 158. Part of in- scription on the west side of Stela N, Co- pan. Maudslay, part 4, plate LXXIX. mentioned above (west side of Stela N). Although it was discussed at some length in my previous paper, a reexamination has brought to light some facts overlooked in the first examination, which have an important bearing on the question in- volved; and they will be noticed here. This series reversed is as follows: 14-17-19-10-0-0 to 1 Ahau 8 Chen (figure 158). Written out if is 14 great eyeles, 17 cycles, 19 katuns, 10 ahaus, 0 chuens, O days, to 1 Ahau 8 Chen. Changed into days it gives the following result, counting 20 cyeles to the great cycle: Days [loreaticycles: 955 ssa enes --2< 40::8205000 ey cles = Seon = esas pee ee -. 2,448, 000 19ikatuns= 95203" asele es ee se Bees 136, 800 iQ) Alogyree a bee eR MISS 3, 600 MEO Geshe eos ot er ee ne Fe 42,908, 400 Subtract 2,260 calendar rounds_—__- 42,894, 800 Remainder ___._-.- nie th tn Bees 18, 600 If we count back this number of days from 1 Ahau 8 Chen, year 3 Ben, it brings us to 12 Ahau 13 Zotz, year 5 Lamat, which will be the first day of the first, or most remote, of the 14 great cycles, counting the series in this manner upward from the 15th: 1st great cycle 2nd great cycle, etc., to 14th great cycle (15th great cycle) 17 cycles 19 katuns 10 ahaus 0 chuens 0 days If we count back from the same date (1 Ahau 8 Chen) the 17 cycles, 19 katuns, and 10 ahaus, we reach the first day of the (incomplete) 15th great eyele as we have numbered them above. This day is 6 THOMAS] NUMBER OF CYCLES IN GREAT CYCLE ay) Ahau 8 Cumhu, year 9 Ben. If we count back the great cycles one by one (counting 20 cycles to a great eyele), we shall find the initial dates to be as follows—the numbers given the great cycles being, of course, arbitrary: Ist great cycle____- 12 Ahau 13 Zotz, year 5 Lamat 2nd great cycle _---_- 5 Ahau 3 Ceh, year + Ezanab 3rd great cycle__.__-_ 11 Ahau 8 Pop, year 4 Ben 4th great cycle_____- 4 Ahau 18 Mol, year 3 Akbal dth great cycle. ___-- 10 Ahau 8 Pax, year 2 Ben 6th great cycle .____- 3 Ahau 13 Tzec, year 2 Lamat 7th great cycle___... 9 Ahau 3 Mac, year 1 Ezanab 8th great cycle______ 2 Ahau 8 Uo, year 1 Ben 9th great cycle______ 8 Ahan 18 Chen, year 13 Akbal 10th great cycle_____- 1 Ahau 8 Kayab, year 12 Ben 11th great cycle__.__- 7 Ahau 13 Xul, year 12 Lamat 12th great cycle______ 13 Ahau 38 Kankin, year 11 Ezanab 13th great cycle_____- 6 Ahau 8 Zip, year 11 Ben 14th great cycle____..12 Ahau 18 Yax, year 10 Akbal 15th great cycle_____- 5 Ahau 8 Cumhu, year 9 Ben This result shows our calculation to be correct, taking the day of the inscription (1 Ahau 8 Chen) as that from which to count back. As there are 14 complete great cycles, which we estimate at 20 eycles each, and the minor periods (17 eycles, 19 katuns, and 10 ahaus), the latter must fall in the 15th great cyele, which is incomplete. Count- ing back these minor. periods, we reach, as has been stated, 5 Ahau 8 Cumhu, year 9 Ben, as the first day of this 15th great cycle. Counting back from this latter date 20 cycles (or 1 great cycle) we reach 12 Ahau 18 Yax, year 10 Akbal, the first day of the 14th great cycle, and so on to the initial day of the first, which we find to be 12 Ahau 15 Zotz, year 5 Lamat, giving exactly the same result as our ealeula- tion of the whole as one single series. By both methods the first day of the entire series, and hence the first great cycle as numbered above, is found to be 12 Ahau 13 Zotz. But this, though correct so far as calculation is concerned, is not proof, as the results given must necessarily follow if the date counted from is 1 Ahau 8 Chen, and 20 cycles are counted to a great cycle. This is unsatisfactory, as it fails to bring in as the first day of a great cycle 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, which was a normal date at Copan. I am strongly inclined to believe that the terminal date of the series instead of 1 Ahau 8 Chen, as given in the inscription, should be 13 Ahau 8 Chen, which falls in the year 2 Ben. If we count back from this date 17 cycles, 19 katuns, 10 ahaus, 0 chuens, 0 days, it will bring us to 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, year 8 Ben, as the first day of the 15th great cycle, as we havearbitrarily numbered them above. If we count back the entire series, 14-17-19-10-0_0, from 13 Ahau 8 Chen, year 2 Ben, it brings us to 11 Ahau 13 Zotz, year + Lamat, as the first day of the Ist 256 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 great eycle as numbered above. The first days of the great cycles would then be as follows: Ist great cycle_____- 11 Ahau 13 Zotz, year 4 Lamat 2nd great cycle--_-_-_-- 4 Ahau 38 Ceh, year 3 Ezanab 8rd great cycle ------ 10 Ahau 8 Pop, year 3 Ben 4th great cycle ------ 3 Ahau 18 Mol, year 2 Akbal 5th great cycle -__---- 9 Ahau 8 Pax, year 1 Ben 6th great cycle _----- 2 Ahau 13 Tzec, year 1 Lamat 7th great cycle------ 8 Ahau 38 Mac, year 13 Ezanab 8th great cycle -_----- 1 Ahau 8 Uo, year 13 Ben 9th great cycle_-_-__-- 7 Ahau 18 Chen, year 12 Akbal 10th great cycle __.--- 13 Ahau 8 Kayab, year 11 Ben 11th great cycle_-_---- 6 Ahau 13 Xul, year 11 Lamat 12th great cycle___-_-- 12 Ahau 3 Kankin, year 10 Ezanab 13th great cycle__-_-__- 5 Ahau 8 Zip, year 10 Ben 14th great cycle------ 11 Ahau 18 Yax, year 9 Akbal 15th great cycle_-.--- 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, year 8 Ben The method of numbering the great cycles must be understood as wholly arbitrary, given merely for convenience, and to include the 15 that are referred to in the count. Ido not believe that there was any consecutive numbering of these supposed time periods in the sense indicated by Goodman; in fact, as I expect to show, they were not time periods in any true sense of the term. The reason for believing that the date following the inscription should be 13 Ahau 8 Chen instead of 1 Ahau 8 Chen is that 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, as appears from the inscriptions at Copan and Quirigua, was the favorite initial date, most of the initial series going back to it, and that counting back the minor periods of the series from 138 Ahau 8 Chen brings us to 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu. If we turn to Goodman’s ‘‘Archaic Chronological Calendar” and count forward, from the beginning of his 54th great cycle, 17 cycles, it will bring us to the 4th eyele of his 55th great cycle, and to the 19th katun of this cycle and the 10th ahau of this katun, where we find the day to be 13 Ahau 8 Chen. Weare therefore of the opinion that the terminal day of the long series should be 13 Ahau 8 Chen, and that Goodman is wrong in rejecting it. As there are 17 cycles, it proves, as it stands, that the authors of the inscriptions counted 20 cycles to the great cyele, which is consistent with their system of numeration. I have shown in my previous paper why 1 Ahau 8 Zip can not be the initial date of this series. As bearing on the explanation of this series, the following facts in regard to the symbols are worthy of special notice. It will be seen by an inspection of the series shown in figure 158 that the great cycle symbol (glyph 5) is a face character very much like that of the cycle, except that it has a superfix, which unfortunately is too nearly oblit- erated to be traced. However, it is noticeable that in both it and the cycle symbol the hand figure is across the lower jaw. According to Goodman, ‘‘the hand on the cheek, the thumb or wrist forming the . THOMAS] NUMBER OF CYCLES IN GREAT CYCLE 257 lower jaw, usually characterizes the face sign for 20” (page 52), and this conclusion is sustained by the evidence we have given above. Goodman’s perverseness in contradicting his own evidence in order to maintain his theory is shown in reference to this sign. It is found almost universally on the cycle face characters, as may be seen in his examples on page 25 of his work. It is true that it may be contended, as Goodman in fact does contend, that it signifies that 20 of the next lower order make one of thisorder. Admit this; it follows that when the same sign is found on the great eyele symbol, it signifies that 20 of the next lower order (or cycle) make one great cycle. Although but one example of the great cycle face symbol has been found, it bears clearly and unmistakably this hand sign, and not only is this not denied by Goodman, but is accepted by him and copied as an example of the symbol of this period on page 25 of his work. Thus it will be seen that from whatever side we view the evidence bearing on this question, it is against Goodman’s theory of only 13 eycles to the great cycle. However, before closing the discussion of this point I desire to call attention to one other series, found on Stela C of Quirigua, which seems to have a bearing on the question. This is as follows: 54-13-0-0-0-0, 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu—in other words, 54th great cycle, 13 cycles, 0 katuns, 0 ahaus, 0 chuens, 0 days, to 4 Ahau *8 Cumhu, the 13 being the ordinary numeral symbols, dots and short lines, and very distinct. Goodman’s only comment (page 127) is, “This date is the beginning of the 54th great cycle.” As 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, is, according to his reckoning, the initial day of the 54th great cycle, the series, according to this explanation, covers no lapse of time whatever. Yet, according to his theory, the numbers in these series always relate to time which has elapsed. Hence the 13 cycles relate to 13 of these so-calle@ periods which have passed and still signify no time whatever. This is a palpable contradiction into which he has been led in his effort to maintain an erroneous theory. If he had written the series ‘‘53-13-0-0-0-0 to 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu,” it would have been correct so far as the count is concerned. Dr Seler in his able article, ‘‘ Die Monumente von Copan und Qui- rigua und die Alter-Platten yon Palenque” (Zeitschrift fur Ethnologie, Heft 6, 1899, pages 670-758), makes some remarks in regard to the series above noticed to which it is desirable to call attention.@ It appears from this article that he follows Goodman in counting 13 cycles to the great cycle, or 13 units of the 5th order to make one of the sixth (I repeat again that Goodman’s terms are used merely for convenience). Moreover, he seems to look upon these as real time periods. That he, who is so familiar with the subject, has not «This article was not received by me until all this paper, except the last few pages and the notices of it which have been inserted, had been written. As I have seen no reason, because of Seler’s article, to change anything previously written, I make this statement as due to myself. 22 ETH+-04—17 258 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 entered into a careful examination of the basis on which Goodman’s theoretical ‘‘ Chronological System” rests, and that he has accepted Goodman’s theory of 15 eycles to the next higher period, without thoroughly testing it, and noting the 20 cycles of the Dresden codex, is somewhat surprising to me. However, he may have reserved the discussion of these points for a future article. In speaking of the series last referred to, 54-13-0-0-0-0, 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, he says: Here one sees that the final date is the normal date itself. Its distance from the normal date can be placed only at 0 or the above-named immense period of 18,720 years. The builders of the monuments have done neither. They have provided all the lower multiplicands, or smaller periods, with the index 0, but to the highest and greatest they have placed the multiplier 13. Thirteen is the number of the index figures which are possible with the tun, the katun, and the cycle names. If, consequently, here at the beginning of the initial series the thirteen cycles are named, nothing else is meant than ‘‘the periods or epochs generally.’’ And the whole initial series would consequently give about the fol- lowing idea: ‘‘ This is a chronological monument. The beginning of the number- ing is the day 4 Ahau 8 Cumku.’’ And the fact that on the west side of the same stela another definite date and its distance from the normal date is named agrees very well with this. Similarly, in my opinion, are to be understood the thirteen cycles which are chiseled on the two sides of Stela C of Copan, immediately under the katun signs, the initial and chief hieroglyphs. It seems clear from this that he has adopted Goodman’s interpreta- tion of the series, unaware of its incongruity with the interpretation of all the other initial series, and the fact that it stands in opposition to his own conelusion stated a little farther on in the same article. As proof of the latter statement, I refer to the quotation from his article given hereafter (page 292). Now, it is apparent that, if the series be interpreted as signifying no lapse of time, but as a mere assertion that the date of the event commemorated was 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu the first day of the 54th great eyele, which interpretation Seler adopts, then the monument must have been erected 3,550 years before the beginning of the cycle which he numbers the tenth (Goodman’s ninth). It isapparent, there- fore, that he has failed to see the contradiction between this state- ment and that which places the erection of the monuments of Copan and Quirigua in the tenth cycle. He objects to the lapse of 3,160 years between the erection of the monuments of Palenque and those at Copan and Quirigua, as improbable, but here admits, by his inter- pretation, a lapse of 3,550 years between monuments at Quirigua. I have stated above that Goodman’s so-called time periods, chuens, ahaus, katuns, ete., are in reality nothing more than orders of units, or steps in numeration. Although this point has been discussed to some extent in my previous paper, I will add here some further evidence bearing on it. bo cco THOMAS) REAL NATURE OF SO-CALLED TIME PERIODS As a means of illustrating the use of numbers by the Mayas, in relation to time, the following exampie—which is part of a series on plate LIx of the Dresden codex (figure 159)—is presented: a) Ae Le: sees ape ce 13 Caban 13 Cauac 13 Imix 13 Akbal 13 Chicchan 13 Manik As this series ascends toward the left hand the forward count will be in that direction. Starting with the column at the right hand, we subtract it (3-18) from the next one to the left, and this one from that immediately to the left of it, and so on to the last. The difference in each ease is found to be 3-18; that is, 3 twenties (8x20) plus 18 equal 78 days, the day being the unit. Counting for- e o a= 2.2 © 008 @ @ @ ae oo So @ ©, see a? cp © 2° oma @ — @ 6e0e cae ae @ooO @oe® 22o L222, ooo pee 228 TD aD, & Ss Soon TTI ey Z oz OGBGOO0GOO Fic. 159. Lower division of plate L1x, Dresden codex ward 75 days from 13 Manik of any year (say 13 Manik 20 Zotz, year 12 Lamat) we reach 13 Chiechan (in this case 18 Mol, same year). Counting forward 78 days from the last date we reach 13 Akbal 16 Ceh, same year; 78 more (always counting from the last date), 13 Imix 14 Pax, same year; 78 more, 13 Cauac 7 Uo, year 13 Ben. If we count back 78 days from 13 Manik 20 Zotz (first column at the right hand), we reach 13 Mulue 2 Pop, year 12 Akbal, which is the initial day of the whole series, the month and year of the first given day being as assumed above. Attention is called to this series not because it presents any peculiar feature, but to show that considering the numerals merely as num- bers in respective orders of units will furnish a full and satisfactory explanation of their object and use. I take for granted that the simplest explanation, if if meets every requirement and presents nothing inconsistent with the known facts regarding the Maya time 260 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [BTH. ANN, 22 and numeral systems, should be accepted rather than a theory which introduces new and hitherto unknown features. If we use ordinary numbers in place of the numeral symbols, and keep them in the relative positions given above, the result will be as follows: 3rd order of units______ 1 2nd order of units______ 1 15 11 i 3 1st order of units _____- 10 12 14 16 18 18 Cauac 13 Imix 13 Akbal 13 Chicchan 13 Manik If we assume these to be successive orders of units indicated by relative position, increasing upward, the day being counted as the primary unit and the vigesimal system being used, except in passing from the second to the third order, where the multiple is 18, all the requirements of the series will be met. Thus, in the first, or right- hand, column, we have 18 units of the 1st order and 3 of the second, or 3X 20=60, making together 60+18=78; and in the second column 16 of the 1st order and 7 of the 2nd order, or 7x 20=140, making together 140+16=156, and so on to the fifth column, where we find 10 of the 1st order, 1 of the second, or 1x 20=20, and 1 of the 3rd order, or 15 x 20=360, making together 3604 204+ 10=390. These num- bers give correct results, as, counting 78 days from 13 Mulue, we reach 15 Manik; counting 156 from the same initial date, we reach 13 Chie- chan, or counting 390 days, wereach 13 Cauae. It is clear, therefore, that if we take these numerals to indicate the number of different orders of units, the orders being indieated by relative position, all requirements of the series are satisfied and the proper results are obtained. If we take one of the high series we find that precisely the same rule obtains, as, for example, one of those on plate LxiI, Dresden codex (see plate LXXTX): A\OfsthelGthyorder Of mini te a= ee eee 6 of the 5th order of units____- Sof the 4thiorderofsunits= ssn eee nee U5 9 8 15 :of theisrdvorder of units ss. 5ee. eens.) sae ee eee =——__ 15 12 of the 2nd order of units - eae ee eae oe = This is upon precisely the same principle as our method of expressing numbers, except that it is according to the vigesimal system, while we use the decimal. Take the number 643,527, where the relative positions express the relative values, it becomes possible to represent the number thus: 6 hundred thousands 4 ten thousands 3 thousands 5 hundreds 2 tens 7 units THOMAS] REAL NATURE OF SO-CALLED TIME PERIODS 261 If, instead of adding the written names, simply the figure should be given, the relative positions being maintained and understood, we would have the Maya method, and the value would be known as well as by our ordinary method of writing numbers horizontally. I have given these details of elementary rules and principles in order to lead up to this point, viz, that symbols may be used to indi- eate orders of units instead of position. In the last example given above, a symbol may be adopted for the ‘‘hundred thousands,” another for ‘‘ten thousands,” another for ‘‘thousands,” ete. They may then be grouped in any regular order most convenient, and yet be as correctly read as by position. This is precisely what has been done in the inscriptions. Symbols have been adopted to indicate the orders of units, as if was inconvenient to do this by means of relative position alone with the dots and short lines—at any rate it is apparent that the latter method is not so well adapted to the glyph form in the inscriptions; but even here we see a strong tendency to maintain the relative position which almost universally obtains and is often the only means of determination. If we take Goodman’s work and go through it from beginning to end and substitute in every series where they oceur ‘‘units of the 2nd order” for his chuens, ‘‘ units of the 3rd order” for his ahaus, ‘‘units of the 4th order” for his katuns, ‘‘ units of the 5th order” for his eyeles, and ‘‘units of the 6th order” for his great cycles, the result will be correct in every instance. I am fully aware that this will be true whether we call them real time peri- ods or orders of units. The point, however, for which Iam contending is, that as the Mayas had a system of numeration and must have used it in expressing numbers in the codices and inscriptions, and this numeral system corresponds exactly with Goodman’s supposed time periods so far as these are given numerically correct by him, there is no necessity or reason for the theory of a separate Maya chrono- logical system (identical so far as correctly given with the Maya num- eral system as used in counting time), differing from their calendar system. From the evidence given in the earlier part of this paper and what has been presented in my preceding paper, the following conclusions appear to be clearly justified: That Mr Goodman has discovered independently the signification and numeral yalues of the symbols found in the inseriptions which he designates by the names eyele, katun, ahau, chuen, and calendar round, though this had been already done in part by others. That he has discovered that certain face and other characters are number symbols, and has ascertained their values. That he has determined the object and use of the numeral series, and the method of counting by the same series from the preceding and following dates, as well as to them. 962 MAYAN CALENDAR S STEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 It is also equally apparent that his theory of a Maya chronological system, distinct from the Maya calendar system—the Mayan method of numeration in counting time—and his method of counting 13 so-called cycles only to the so-called great cycle and 73 great eycles to his so-called grand era are not justified by the facts, nor is his method of numbering the cyeles, katuns, etce., beginning with 73, 13, and 20, satisfactorily proved; and also that his selection of Ik, Manik, Eb, and Caban as the dominical days is erroneous, the true dominieal days being Akbal, Lamat, Ben, and Ezanab, both in the inscriptions and Dresden codex. Let us turn next to his method of numbering the so-called great eycles. According to his theory, as we have seen, 73 great cycles are counted to what he calls the grand era, the common multiple of all the factors of the calendar system and supposed ‘chronological system.” The reason why he adopted this theory is explained in my previous paper, and the explanation need not be repeated here, except so far as merely to state that in order to find a common multiple of the yarious time periods, one must include the number 365, which contains the prime number 73. That there was in the Maya system a number or order of units corresponding with Goodman’s great cycle is certainly true, but this pertained to their numeral, and not their time, system. It is also admitted that the large quadruple glyph that usually heads the initial series is the symbol used to represent this number or order of units. But, as has been shown, there is no reason whatever for believing that they were numbered otherwise than in accordance with the vigesimal system; that is to say, 20 cycles to the great cycle, and 20 great cycles to the next higher unit. It is necessary, therefore, for Goodman, before his theory can be accepted, to show by satisfactory evidence that, on reaching the cycles and great cycles, the ordinary method of proceed- ing by the vigesimal system was abandoned and other multiples were introduced. That there was a change from this rule in passing from the 2nd order of units, or chuens, to the 3rd order, or ahaus, where 18 was made the multiple, is proved by incontrovertible evidence and hence must be admitted, even though we may not be able to show by absolute demonstration why the change was made. Nevertheless, we are justified in believing that, in this instance, the method of numera- tion was made to correspond with the number of months in the year. But no such reason appears for Goodman’s proposed change in the higher orders of units; we are, therefore, justified in rejecting the idea until other proof, besides its necessity to support a theory, is shown. It must be made evident by proof that the series can not be otherwise explained, which we have shown is not the case, or it must be shown that the great eycle symbols present, by their forms, the numbers assigned them. THOMAS] NUMBERING OF SO-CALLED GREAT CYCLES 2638 Before referring to the numbers of the great cycles as obtained by a study of the forms of the symbols, I introduce the following quotation from Goodman’s work (page 38): The number and diversity of these signs and the fantastic character of some of them—notably the face series—suggest a hieratic design to conceal the purport of the inscriptions from the uninitiated; but I think the determinative feature of their numeration, the desire to give symmetry and grace to their glyphs, and the possible purpose to avoid sameness and repetition, sufficiently account for the variety without ascribing it to a cryptogramic intention. It is probable, there- fore, that all the other series of numerals were as intelligible to the populace as the simple one of dots and bars—being, as it were, a mere difference in the style of characters, such as is to be seen in fancy printing or ornamental sign-writing. While it is likely that in most instances there is a full series of similar signs, just enough modified to distinguish them from each other, running from 1 to 20, I do not think this to be the case throughout. It will be found, I believe, that there are many sporadic signs, or signs without any serial connection. The fre- quent use of certain numbers accounts for this, and it is to designate these that solitary symbols are oftenest employed. There will probably be more signs dis- covered for 13, 18, and 20, than for any other number. I do not claim that the value of any sign about to be given is correct beyond question. On the contrary, I think it very likely that in some instances I shall myself find reason for achange. But, as in most cases I shall explain why I have attached the value given to particular signs, the reader will not be misled, but can accept, reject, or modify my estimate, according to his own judgment. It will be only by persistent trial, assumption, alteration, and readjustment, until a figure that fulfils the requirement of every condition under which a character appears is hit upon, that we shall be able to fix the values of all the numeral signs. That the great cycle symbol can be determined by position in a series, even though imperfect in form, is evident from what has been shown, but the number must be determined otherwise. In order to show on what Goodman bases his conclusion as to the numbers of the great cycles so far as determined by the form, I quote the following from his work (page 83): ELEMENTS OF THE GREAT CYCLE SIGN Here the reckoning reverts to the 5-day period. It is multiplied by 72, making an ahau; that by 20, making a katun; that by 20 again, making a cycle; and that by 13, making a greatcycle. The last multiplier is the outflaring trinal character at the top [figure 160]. It is a 13 sign, duplicated to balance the glyph. The two 20 multipliers appear only in the first of the symbols given above—or, rather, only in that does the single one extend all the way to the bottom, as is commonly the case. There should be two separate signs, however, as shown in some of the glyphs; but I have selected these particular specimens for another purpose, which I shall presently state. The 20 sign in the first glyph looks like anything but the same sign in the other two, and resembles a fish more than anything else. Yet they are identical in character. both representing the feathered dragon, the fringed jaw alone of which, reduced to the cursive comb-like character, is the commonest sign for 20. The evolution of this character is so curious and 264 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [PTH. ANN. 22 interesting that I herewith give a series of glyphs, all taken from great-cycle symbols, showing the gradations [figure 161]. The reason why I selected the particular symbols given above, is that I think the number of the great cycle is specifically stated in them. Close observers will have noticed several peculiar things about the great-cycle character. The most peculiar of these is that, while the form of the katun symbol is preserved in it fully in every other respect, the cawac sign disappears from the superfix and is replaced by some other character. In more than three-fourths of the dates in the 54th great cycle a dragon’s head occupies its place; a tiger’s head predominates in the 55th, while the remainder is made up of faces and signs that may represent a day, a cycle, or some other period. Whatever their character. they have no Frag. 160. Great cycle symbols. Goodman, page 83, peculiarities that can at present be construed into numerals, except in case of the three glyphs here reproduced; so, if the others have any numeric value, it must be arbitrarily expressed. The three in question indicate the 54th great cycle, and I think that all of them announce that fact, but each in a different way. The center of the katun superfix in the first is composed of a sign for 18 and a face. If it were plainly the face for 3 we should be left in no doubt; but, in consequence of the defacement of the stone, it is impossible to determine if a band—the char- acteristic of the 3 head—extends across the forehead or not. In the second glyph the ik symbol—a sign for 6—appears in an inclosuré that probably represents 9, but as the coil is not clearly discernible we are again left in uncertainty. The third glyph has the meaningless face, which elsewhere serves as a mere vehicle Bey ° x ~~ AN 2) ) F for numerals, bearing a sign for 9, surmounted by three objects evidently intended for spheres, whose value is doubled by the dotted lines in them, rendering it prob- able that the combination was designed to express 9 6=54. Imake no claim to absolute certainty in any of these cases; but, however uncertain the renderings may be separately, they collectively derive a high degree of probability from a single significant fact. The unmistakable numeral sign in each glyph is a divisor of 54. That these glyphs—the only ones with recognizable numerals—should contain signs for three out of the six numbers by which 54 is divisible, is a circum- stance too singular to be attributed to accident when a more reasonable explana- tion is to be found in the theory that these three particular figures were chosen with the definite purpose of arriving at that number. ienancnana 1G. 161. Comb-like symbols for 20. Goodman, page §3. THOMAS] THE GREAT CYCLE SYMBOL 265 As Goodman admits in the passage quoted, it is only in the three great cycle signs presented (see figure 160) that the evidence of num- bering is found; let us examine this evidence. ‘‘ Here,” he says, “‘the reckoning returns to the 5-day period. It is multiplied by 72, making an ahau,” yet he fails to allude to anything in the figure to justify the statement. That the comb-like characters and their substitutes have the value of 20 is probably correct, the sign being duplicated, as Goodman suggests, for the sake of symmetry. The fair inference is that in the katun symbol they indicate that this time period or order of units is equal to 20 ahaus (20 360=7,200). This admission, how- ever, as will be seen, is fatal to Goodman’s theory. The three figures given represent, according to this author, the 54th great eyele, and indicate by the details, but each in a different way, the number 54. This, he says, is shown in the first (a) in the center of the superfix, where he finds a sign of 18 and a face denoting 3—though he admits that the latter is too imperfect for positive deter- mination. The fact is that he has presented no proof that the dotted coil denotes 18. He asserts in his explanation of the ahau series on Stela J, Copan, copied in full in my previous paper, that the double coil denotes 18, but gives no proof to sustain the statement. His symbol for 18 in the ear ornament (page 87) is wholly different. Moreover, the face in the superfix, so far as the details remain, corresponds in no respect with the face numerals for 3 given on page 43 of his work, but on the contrary bears a strong resemblance to at least two of the face characters for 1 (page 42). It is unnecessary to follow him in order to find the desired number in the other two figures (b, c), as not a particle of proof is offered to sustain his assertions. It is apparent from his language that he felt his attempt here was a failure, but it was necessary to offer something on the point in behalf of his theory. Why 54 was given as the number of this great cycle, which begins with the day 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, is apparent from the great-cycle column of his ‘‘ Perpetual Chronological Calendar”; but his reason for beginning the series with 4 Ahau 15 Yax will be referred to farther on. In order to make clear what is stated below in regard to the forms and details of the symbols of the great cycle, katun, ete., a number of the types of the great-cycle symbol are shown in figure 162; of the ahau in figure 165; of the katun in figure 164; and of the cycle in figure 165. That this symbol—several varieties of which are shown in figure 162 (also seen in figure 160, and as initials in plates LXXI-LXXIII, LXXV, LXXVI, and LXXvItI, and figures 146, 147, 151, and 158)—is built up from, or base on, the 360-day or ahau symbol of the ordi- nary form, as shown in number 9, figure 163, is evident. The katun symbol of the ordinary type (/, figure 164), has the same body form as the ahau symbol, but there is added a superfix consisting of a comb-like figure on each side, with a middle character usually resem- bling a Cauae symbol. 266 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS (ETH. ANN. 22 ELE) easy cs ees ? (SVD) Fic. 162, Types of great cycle symbols from the inscriptions. 1, Stela E, Copan, Mandslay, part 3, plate XLIX; 2, Stela I, Copan, Maudslay, part 3, plate Lxv; 3, Stela D, Quirigua, west side, Maudslay, part 12, plate xxv1; 4, Stela D, Quirigua, east side, Maudslay, part 12, plate xxv; uirigua, Maudslay, part 12, plate 5, Stela J, Quirigua, Mandalay, part 12, plate xLVv1; 6, Stela K, XLIX; 7, Monolithic Animal B, Quirigua, Maudslay, part 11, plate x1v; 8 and 9, Stela C, Copan, Maudslay, part 2, plate x1 (both specimens on this plate); 10, Stela A, Copan, Maudslay, part 2, late XXX; 11, Altar S, Copan, Maudslay, part 4, plate xcrv; 12,Stela N, Copan, east side, Mauds- ay, part 4, plate LXXIXx; 13,Stela N,Copan, west side, Maudslay, part 4, piste LXXIX, glyph 14, counting from the top; 14, supposed great-cycle symbol 1rom the Dresden codex, plate XLII. THOMAS] GREAT CYCLE AND CYCLE SYMBOLS 267 This is an evident approach to the great-cycle symbol, as may be seen by comparing number 9, figure 163, with the types of the usual form shown in numbers 1 and 2, figure 162. The usual cycle symbol or symbol of the 5th order of units (figure 165 and figure 148) does not follow the ahau type, being wholly different in form. But an exam- ination of the great-cycle symbols given in numbers 1 and 2, figure 162, and in the other figures referred to above shows clearly that they are based on the ahau symbol. If the additions to the ahau symbol in order to form this symbol have any number signification—and it is reasonable to suppose that they do, as the symbols are numeral characters—then Goodman is probably right in assuming that the comb-like figures (the center character being variable) denote 20 asa multiple. The ordinary cycle symbol varies from the ahau type, being made up of two Cauac characters; but these have the same sig- Fic. 163. Types of the ahau (360) symbol. nification, if Goodman be right, as the comb-like figures in the katun and great-eycle symbols—that is, 20. Of this, however, we have no positive proof, except it be found in the symbol itself, where the char- acter is, or the two combined are, beyond question, used to represent a number. An examination of the face characters for this period or order of units shows that, as a general rule, the symbol of 20 or full count (equals 0) (see figure 144) is present in the form of a hand across the lower jaw. We have also called attention to the fact that the only face character of the great cycle found in the inscriptions (see glyph 5, figure 158) has the hand across the lower jaw, indicating that it is equivalent to 20 of the next lower order, that is, 20 cycles. There is, in fact, seemingly positive evidence that the superfix of the great-cyele characters does not and can not give the number 54, as those which represent this great cycle, be its number what it may, differ from one another, as will be seen by reference to figure 162, 268 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 numbers 2 to 12. Having worked out his system in tabular form, Goodman finds that 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu is the first day of his 54th great 1a) (CLOT) y Fic. 164. Types of the katun symbol. eyele, assuming, as he does, that 4 Ahau 13 Yax was the first day of his grand era. The particular process by which he reached the con t g Fig. 165. Types of the cycle symbol. clusion that 4 Ahau 13 Yax was the initial day of his first great cycle, and hence of his grand era, is not clear. The choice was apparently THOMAS] BEGINNING OF GOODMAN’S ‘‘GRAND ERA” 269 arbitrary, though it was necessary that the date chosen should make connection with 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu as the first day of a great cycle. His explanation of the grand era, on pages 26 and 27 of his work, shows the relation of the minor periods to it according to his theory, but does not give the reason for selecting 4 Ahau 15 Yax as the initial date. On page 34 he speaks of the date as an important one in the inscriptions, but still does not give the reason for making it the beginning of the grand era. That any other 4 Ahau, which would bring 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu as the first day of a great cycle, would answer as well as 4 Ahau 13 Yax, even on his theory, is easily shown. As the Mayan time count is an orderly round, a given day recurring at the end of a certain period, it is evident, as everyone acquainted with the system knows, that the count of periods may begin at any point, unless some fixed point in the series is found with its proper number. One check in this respect found in the inscriptions is the fact just mentioned that, according to Goodman’s system, 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu appears to be the initial day of a great cycle, and the initial dates of the other great cycles must fit correctly with this determined initial date—that is to say, following his theory and counting 13 cycles to the great cycle, these initial dates must all be a day 4 Ahau. Another possible check is the long series in the Copan inseription, which goes back 14 great cycles preceding that beginning with 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu. Let us turn to Goodman’s ‘‘ Perpetual Chronological Calendar,” to the great-eyele column. Suppose that instead of commencing with the date 4 Ahau 13 Yax, with which he begins the grand era, we begin with 4 Ahau 18 Zotz, the initial day of his 40th great cycle. The series will then be as follows, if we adopt his method of numbering: 73. 4 Ahau 18 Zotz 18. 4 Ahau 8 Pop 1. 4 Ahau 18 Cumhu 19. 4 Ahau 8 Muan 2. 4 Ahau 13 Kankin 20. 4 Ahau 3 Zac 3. 4 Ahau 8 Yax 21. 4 Ahau 18 Xul 4.4 Ahau 3 Xul 22. 4 Ahau 13 Uo 5. 4 Ahau 18 Pop 23. 4 Ahau 13 Pax 6. 4 Ahau 18 Muan 24. 4 Ahau 8 Ceh 7. 4 Ahau 13 Zac 25. 4 Ahau 3 Mol 8. 4 Ahau 8 Yaxkin 26. 4 Ahan 18 Zip 9. 4 Ahau 3 Zip 27. 4 Ahau 18 Kayab 10. 4 Ahau 3 Kayab 28. 4 Ahau 13 Mac 11. 4 Ahau 18 Ceh .) We) 29. 4 Ahau 8 Chen 12. 4 Ahau 13 Mol 30. 4 Ahau 3 Tzec 13. 4 Ahau 8 Zotz 31. 4 Ahau 3 Uayeb 14. 4 Ahau &§ Cumhu 32. 4 Ahau 18 Kankin 15. 4 Ahau 3 Kankin 33. 4 Ahau 13 Yax 16. 4 Ahau 18 Chen 34. 4 Ahau 8 Xul 17. 4 Ahau 13 Tzec And so on to the 72d, the next being 4 Ahau 18 Zotz, with which the numbering began. 270 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 This will meet every requirement, including the limitations above mentioned, as fully and as completely as the series given by Goodman, even if we hold to his theory of 15 cycles to the great cycle and 73 great cycles to his grand era, and follow his own method of counting. The same thing is true if we select, as the first great cycle, any other of the 40 which precede that with which we began the count. There is another fact which appears to conflict with Goodman’s theory and, indeed, to be irreconcilable with it. According to this theory, the grand era, consisting of 136,656,000 days, is the least common multiple of all the different factors of the regular calendar as well as of his chronological calendar, at the beginning of which all the periods start anew on their grand round. That this number is the common multiple of all these periods or factors is true. But how are we to reconcile the theory with the fact that he begins this great era with the day 4 Ahau 13 Yax, which is certainly not the beginning day of a year or of a month? It is true the 136,656,000 days is an exact multiple of 365, but, starting the count of 565 with the day 4 Ahau 15 Yax makes the latter number a mere numeral factor; no regular Mayan year could begin with the day 4 Ahau or with the 13th day of the month Yax. From February 1, 1899, to the following January 31, in our time system, is a year’s time, but the period is composed of parts of two calendar years. ; Goodman’s theory, in order to be correct and keep the time periods in proper order, if his grand era is a true and absolute rounding-out period of all the minor periods, absolutely requires that this great period shall begin with the Ist day (or 20th if he prefers this number- ing) of the month Pop, and the first year of the 52-year cycle or calen- dar round. Otherwise, when the era ends, it will be in the middle of a year, as it will if it begins on 4 Ahau 13 Yax, and closes with 3 Cauaec 12 Yax. The question next in importance is, are his tables correct, though based on an erroneous theory? Those of the first series, termed the “Archaie Annual Calendar,” are nothing more than the ordinary eal- endars of the 52 years of what has heretofore been termed a ‘‘cyele,” but to which he applies the name ‘‘ calendar round,” each year being given separately. They are all contained in my condensed calendar. This is nothing new, as the method had been in use for a number of years before Goodman commenced his investigations. As his ‘‘Arehaie Chronological Calendar” is nothing more than a continuous series of ahaus, or 360-day periods, using Ahau as the ‘‘initialday” through 39 of the 5th order of units, following one another in regular succession, it is correet—with certain exceptions to be noted—where Ahau is used as the initial day in the count, but will not apply when any other day is selected as the initial date. It is erroneous in counting 13 of the eycles or the 5th order of units to the next higher order, and in begin- ning the numbering of the so-called periods with 73, 15, aud 20. His tables of years are also erroneous in the latter respect. «es ergs THOMAS] GOODMAN'S TABLES—SUCCESSION OF THE AHAUS 271 It is apparent to anyone at all acquainted with the Mayan time and numeral systems that, having a continuous series of days written out in regular order and of sufficient length, with the day numbers and month numbers attached, we may start at any point and count off the numbers given in the ahau, katun, and cycle periods, and we will have precisely what is given in Goodman’s “ Archaic Chronological Calendar,” except that we may have some other initial day than Ahau. If it should be Kan it would at some point correspond exactly with the series of the Dresden codex which have been referred to; if Ahau, then the periods would agree with those of the inscriptions and some of those in the Dresden codex. Now, it is evident that in count- ing off a number in the next higher group above the so-called cycle, if we count off the latter periods by 20, instead of 13, the succession would be as regular as in the other case, there being nothing whatever in the system requiring or even suggesting 15. Hence we might take Goodman’s tables, if more extended, and making 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu our starting point, count forward or backward by steps of 20 cycles each, and thus find the correct initial days of the great cycles as we have shown above. With the tables given in his work we can only count forward from the beginning of his 54th great cycle to the 7th cycle of the 455th great cycle as he has numbered them, showing that 10 Ahau 13 Yaxkin is the beginning day of the next great cycle, counting 20 cycles to the great cycle, which I have shown to be the correct method. I shall not discuss Goodman’s theory of the number values of the day and month symbols, as there does not appear to have been any use made of them as numerals. Let us turn again to the order in which the numbers of the ahaus follow one another, to wit: 13, 9, 5, 1, 10, 6, 2, 11, 7, 3, 12, 8, 4, 13, ete. This has been fully discussed in one light in this paper, but the object at present is to view it in another light and with special refer- ence to Goodman’s theory in regard to it. That has also been noticed to some extent in my previous paper, but there are some points omitted in that discussion to which it is desirable to call atten- tion. I quote in full Goodman’s statement of his discovery of the order of succession : Yumix is the day following Ahau; hence, I reasoned to myself, if a period begin with the former it mist terminate with the latter; moreover, 1 succeeding 13 in the day count, if 1 Ymix begin a period 13 Ahau must end it; and, further, this period being composed of 13 lesser ones of 20 years each, it is at a distance of 260 years apart in the annual calendar that I must look for a corresponding 1 Ymix and 13 Ahau, recollecting that I need not expect to find them falling on any fixed date. But,as the order of the 13 subdivisions is given, with the terminal Ahau numbers, it is not necessary to attempt so extended a research, and prudence dic- tates that I keep my experiments within the narrowest possible limits to guard against mistake. I will, therefore, at the start proceed only to the end of the first 20-year period, or katun, and look for 11 Ahau. The trial is made. It proves abortive, as I anticipated. The Ahau number at the end of 20 years is 7 instead of 11. The desired 11 Ahau is 5 months away to the left. It is the same old 272 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 story of failure over again. But wait a minute! Five months are equivalent to 100 days. To divide by 20 would take just 5 days from each of the 20 years of the katun. Years? Whatif they were not years at all that Landa was talking about, but only periods of 360 days? They may be the ahaus. Let me hasten to find out how the numbers will run in a division of this possible Katun into 20 such periods. Here it is: 9, 5;1, 10, 6, 2, 11, 7, 3, 12, 8, 4, 18, 9, 5, 1, 10, 6, 2, 11. Ah, this is significant! That paragraph of Perez, what are its exact words? “The Indians of Yucatan had yet another species of cycle, but as the method followed by them in using it can not be found, nor any example by which an idea of its nature might be imagined, I shall only copy what is literally said of it in a manuscript, viz: ‘There was another number which they called wa katun, and which served them asa key to find the katuns. According to the order of its march it falls on the days of the wayeb yaab and revolves to the end of cer- tain years: katunes 13, 9, 5,1, 10,6, 2,11, 7, 3,12, 8,4.°*’ Poor Don Pio! To have the pearl in his grasp and be unaware of its pricelessness, like so many others. But I must not exult too much yet. The succession of the katuns, reckoned according to this principle, is yet to be ascertained before my fancied discovery can be established by a crucial test. I score the ahaus off in the foregoing order, and, sure enough, the 20ths give the desired result, 11, 9, 7,5, 3, 1, 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, 2,13. Eureka! The perturbed spirit of the Maya calendar. which has endeay- ored so long to impart its message to the world, may rest at last. That taking the day numbers of the first days of the ahaus in a katun will give the order of succession mentioned is certainly true, as we have shown, but the question to be discussed here relates to the statement of the authority quoted by Perez. According to this state- ment as given by Goodman, ‘‘ There was another number which they called ua katun, and which served them as a key to find the katuns. According to the order of its march it falls on the days of the uayeb yaab, and revolves to the end of certain years; katunes 13, 9, 5, 1, 10, GO Ike, Wi, Bh ales fh, GY It will be best, however, to give Perez’s exact words as found in the appendix to Brasseur’s edition of Landa’s ‘‘ De las Cosas,” page 418: “* Habia otro numero que Hamaban Ua Katun el que les servia como Maya para acertar y hallar los katunes, y segun el orden de sus movimientos cae 4 los dos dias del Uayeb haab y da su vuelta al cabo de algunos afios: Katunes 13, 9,5, 1, 10, (yey ale Tig eh dees elas Brasseur’s translation is as follows: *Tls avaient un autre chiffre qu’ils appelaient Ua Katun, qui leur servait comme de clef, pour ajuster et trouver les katun et suivant l’ordre de ses mouvements, il tombe aux deux jours du Uayab haab et retourne a la fin de quelquesannees: Katun 135955, LONG 2 Le 733 Leases 4.2. A closer translation than that by Goodman, which omits one impor- tant word, may be given as follows: They have another number which they called ua katun, which served them as a key to regulate and find the katuns, and according to the order of its move- ments falls on the two days of the uayeb haab and returns at the end of certain years; katuns 13, etc. The important word omitted by Goodman and which is usually omitted in English translations is the ‘“‘two.” Brasseur’s translation THOMAS] THE SUCCESSION 13, 9, 5, 1, 10, ETC. 03 contains it, and Perez recognizes it by his (erroneous) reference on the same page as the passage quoted, the ‘‘second” intercalary day. I called special attention to this important word in my ‘‘Study of the Manuscript Troano,” page 55. Now, it is certain that the unknown author of this passage was somewhat familiar with the Maya time system, otherwise he could not have hit upon this order of numbers which is found in at least three different relations in the system; and it is also certain that his reference is to true Mayan years (as is shown by the reference to the uayeb haab, or five intercalated days), and can not be made to apply to Goodman’s ahaus. As the term ‘‘ years” in the passage quoted can have no other pos- sible meaning than that of 565 days, the question arises, what is meant by the term ‘‘katun” as therein used? That it could not be Goodman’s katun of 7,200 days, or 20 ahaus of 360 days each (which Seler also claims to have discovered), is evident. Although we may not be able to demonstrate what is meant by the term in this connection, we can show where and how this order of succession occurs, using the last of the intercalated days. As the number of the day with which the year ends is the same as that with which it begins, the order will be precisely the same as that in which the years are numbered. If the calendar of the inscriptions and the Dresden codex is used, whose dominical days are Akbal, Lamat, Ben, and Ezanab, the terminal days will be Manik, Eb, Caban, and Ik, and their numbers in the successive years will be as shown in the following table, which extends through the cycle of 52 years, after and before which the same series will be repeated: Manik Eb Caban Ik 1 2 3 4 a) 6 it $ 9 10 11 12 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 4 5) 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Beginning at the bottom and running up the right-hand column, we find precisely the order of succession given in the quotation, to wit, 13, 9, 5, 1, 10, 6, etc. Precisely the same order will be found by run- ning up either of the other columns. Each step, it is true, covers four years, but it forms a basis for easy and ready counting; moreover, the quotation says, ‘‘returns at the end of certain years.” It does 22, ETH—O+4 15 974 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 5) not say the ‘‘numbers” which so return are katuns, but that they “served as a key to find the katuns,” clearly distinguishing between the ‘‘katuns” and ‘‘eertain years.” There is nothing, therefore, in the quotation which implies that the numbers in the series 13, 9, 5, ete., were the numbers of the katuns, nor is there any mention therein of the numbers of the katuns or of the number of years constituting a katun. It is to Landa that we must go for information on the latter point. According to his statement, which has been oft repeated, the Mayas counted their ages by 20 years,“but he says nothing in reference to the order of numbering.? As the periods referred to are unquestionably years, the katuns must be periods of years; and writers who have so contended are cor- rect in this respect, and 20 years is the number assigned to a katun by all the early authorities, whether right or wrong. The direction of counting, it is true, is backward, but, as Good- man states, the reference among the Mayas is generally to past time, and the example Landa gives of counting time, in connection with the passage referred to, relates to what had passed. He says an elderly man of whom he had spoken could easily count back 300 years by means of the katuns or ages. Thisauthor, if I rightly understand his language, indicates that they had a still higher count of 13 x 20 years. His language is as follows: No solo tenian los indios cuenta en el atio y meses, como queda dicho, y sena- lado atras pero tenian cierto modo de contar los tiempos y sus cosas por edades, las quales hazian de veynte en veynte atios, contando XI veyntes con una de las xx letras de los meses que Haman Ahaw, sin orden sino retruecanados como pareceran en la siguiente raya redonda; Ilaman les a estos en su lengua Katunes.@ Thirteen times 20 is 260, or five cycles of 52 years each, the same num- ber of years that there are days in their so-called sacred year. Possi- bly, however, he may refer here to the 260-day period. When we free our minds entirely from any thought that ahaus, katuns, ete., represent or have any relation to time periods, and look upon them merely as numbers, just as we think of tens, hundreds, ete., the difficulties raised by Goodman’s theory of a Maya ‘‘ chronological calendar” vanish. The Mayas of one section, for some historical, tradi- tional, or mythological reason, selected a particular initial date for their era, and, as a usual thing, counted long periods from it, and in doing so used numbers in accordance with their numeral system, and represented these in their inscriptions by certain symbols. This is all of Goodman’s supposed wonderful chronological system—this and nothing more. It would have been much better if he had used the real Mayan numeral terms as they stand (as Dr Brinton has suggested), or in a aLanda, De Las Cosas, p. 312. b It will doubtless be recalled that in the “Study of the Manuscript Troano” I contended that theahaus or katuns consisted of 24 years, basing my conclusion on the order given above; but a more careful study of the passage quoted above from Perez does not necessarily indicate that these periods were numbered according to the order given. THOMAS] THE CAKCHIQUEL CALENDAR 275 modified form, to indicate the variation of time numeration from the regular vigesimal system, thus: 20 units = 1 kal in place of chuen. 18 kal = 1 bak in place of ahau. 20 bak = 1 pic in place of katun. 20 pic = 1 calab in place of cycle. 20 calab = 1 kinchil in place of great cycle. 20 kinchil = 1 ahau in place of grand era. It is true that above the kal the numbers would vary from the true vigesimal count in consequence of counting but 18 instead of 20 kal to the next higher order. This, however, might have been shown by prefixing ‘‘ minor,” thus, ‘‘minor bak,” ‘‘minor pie,” ete., but no real confusion would have resulted from using the simple names as Brinton has suggested. Seler suggests ‘‘uinal” in place of chuen; “tun ” in place of ahau, but retains ‘‘katun” as applied by Goodman. THE CAKCHIQUEL CALENDAR ’ If the ‘“‘Annals of the Cakchiquels,” written or supposed to have been written soon after the Spanish conquest by a member of the Xahila family, are to be trusted in regard to the Cakchiquel calendar system, this system was peculiar, differing in some important respects from that of the Mayas, which has been described in the preceding part of this paper. All that is known in regard to its peculiar features is found in these Annals, and must be gathered from incidental men- tion of dates. In order to place the data before the reader, I quote the more important of these mentions from the translation by Dr Brinton in the Library of Aboriginal American Literature, v1, ‘‘The Annals of the Cakchiquels,” 1885. As a noted revolt, described as the ‘‘revolt at Iximche,” is selected by the author of the Annals as the era from which to reckon all sub- sequent events, we begin the quotations with the passages referring to and fixing the date of this event. ‘ (1) The day of the revolt was appointed by this chief, Cay Hunahpu, and on this day, 11th Ah, the revolt broke out [page 157]. (2) Thirty-one days after the revolt, as the Quiches desired to destroy those of Tibaqoy, these Tukuches removed to Chiavar and put to death the Quiches, who yielded in a battle at a place named Yaxontzui, on the day 9th Caok [page 1591. (3) On the 36th day after the revolt Cinahitoh perished . . . on the day 11th Can [ibid.]. (4) One year less ten days after the revolt was hanged the chief orator Ahmox- nay on the day 11th Akbal [ibid.]. (5) The day 8 Ah was one year after the Revolt [page 161]. (6) The day 5 Ah was two years after the Revolt [ibid.]. (7) The day 2 Ah was three years after the Revolt [ibid.]. (8) The day 12 Ah completed the fourth year after the Revolt [ibid.]. (9) The 9 Ah completed the fifth year after the Revolt [page 163]. (10) The 6 Ah completed the sixth year after the Revolt [ibid.]. (11) On the 3 Ah there were seven years from the Revolt [ibid. ]. 276 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 (12) In the eighth year after the revolt, the Tzutuhils were defeated by those of Xeynup and Xepalica; they were slaughtered, Zakbin and Ahmak having perished in the action on the day 13 Ahmak [ibid.]. (13) On the day 13 Ah there were eight years from the revolt [ibid.]. (14) On 10 Ah there were nine years from the revolt [ibid.]. (15) Twelve days were lacking to complete the tenth year after the revolt . the day 8 Imox [ibid.]. (16) The day 7 Ah completed the tenth year after the Revolt [ibid.]. (17) On 4 Ah there were eleven years after the Revolt [ibid.]. (18) On 1 Ah there were twelve years [ibid.]. (19) On 11 Ah there were thirteen years after the Revolt [ibid.]. (20) The day 8 Ah completed the 14th year after the Revolt [page 165]. (21) The day 5 Ah completed the 15th year after the Revolt [ibid.]. (22) The day 2 Ah completed the 16th year after the Revolt [ibid.]. (23) The day 12 Ah completed the 17th year after the Revolt [page 167]. (24) The day 9 Ah completed the 18th year after the Revolt [ibid.]. (25) On the day 3 Caok the doves passed over the city of Iximche. .. . One hundred days after the doves had been seen the locusts came . . . on the day 2 Ye [ibid.]. " (26) The day 8 [67] Ah completed the 19th year after the Revolt [ibid. ] (27) The day 3 Ah completed one cycle [page 169]. (28) With the day 13 Ah another year was completed [ibid. ]. (29) A second year was completed on the day 10 Ah, after the Revolt [ibid.]. (30) On the day 7 Ah was completed the third year of the second cycle after the Revolt [ibid.]. So far the dates given are in regular succession as found in the Annals; the others given are only those which are considered impor- tant. (81) On the day 14 [12?] Camey died the King Hunyg [page 171]....A hundred days after the death of the kings Hunyg and Lahuh Noh, there were elected as kings Cahi Imox and Belehe Qat, on the day 1 Can [page 173]. (32) Twenty days after the chiefs began to rule there was an insurrection . on the day 10 Queh [page 175]. (33) We married your mother, O my children, one year after the death of your grandfather [Hunyg]. We took her to wife on the day 12 Toh [pages 175-177]. (34) On the day 5 Ah was the eighth year of the first [second] cycle. It was during this year [meaning the year following?] that the Castilians arrived. .. . On the day 1 Ganal the Quiches were destroyed by the Castilians. . . . On the day 4 Qat three chiefs, the king and the next in rank, were burned alive by Tunatiuh [page 177]. (35) It was on the day 1 Hunahpu when the Castilians arrived at Iximche with their chief, Tunatiuh. . . . Only five days after, Tunatinuh went forth from the capital. Then the Tzutuhils were conquered by the Castilians. It was the day 7 Camey [page 179]. (36) Twenty-five days afterwards Tunatiuh went forth from the capital to Cuzeatan . . . On the day 2 Queh Atacat was slain... On the day 10 Hunahpu he [Tunatiuh] returned from Cuzcatan. He had been absent only 40 days [page 181]. (37) Our city [Iximche] was abandoned on the day 7 Amak . . . Ten days after we had left the city, war was begun by Tunatiuh . . . on the day 4 Camey .. . One hundred and eighty days after the desertion of the city was completed the ninth year (of the second cycle). On the day 2 Ah was completed the 29th year after the Revolt [page 183]. THOMAS] THE CAKCHIQUEL CALENDAR 277 (38) There were lacking 120 days to complete two years since we had abandoned the capital when Tunatiuh came there in order to set fire to the city. On the day 4 Camey, two years less six months after the beginning of the war, he set fire to the capital and returned [page 185]. (39) On the day 12 Ah was completed the 30th year after the Revolt [ibid.]. (40) On the day 9 Ah was completed the 31st year after the Revolt [ibid.]. (41) In the course of the following year . . . Chiixot was abandoned... . Three hundred days after Chiixot was taken began the payment of tribute . on the day 6 Tzi [pages 185-187]. (42) It was two years less 120 days after the beginning of the tribute when died the chief Ahtun cuc Tihax . . . on the day 6 Akbal. . . . On the day 3 Ah was completed the 33d year [page 187]. (45) For 86 days these chiefs had hid in the woods. . . . On the day 7 Ahmak the chiefs decided to come forth. . . . On the day 13 Ah was completed the 36th [84th] year after the Revolt [page 187]. (44) On the 10th Ah was completed the 35th year after the Revolt. Forty days were lacking to complete three years from the date of the submission of the kings when Belehe Qat died . . . on the 7th Queh [page 188]. (45) On the 8th Ah was completed the 40th year after the revolt. On the 5th Ah was completed the first year of the third cycle [page 189]. (46) It was on the day 11 Ahmak that he [Tunatiuh] killed the Ah-tzib. On the day 2 Ah was completed the second year of the third cycle. One hundred and twenty days after the death of Ahtzib and of the return of Tunatiuh, the prince Mantunalo departed . . . Two hundred and sixty days after his return Tunatinh hanged the king Ahpozotzil Cahi Imox, on the day 13 Ganel [pages 189-190]. (47) The day 12 Ah completed the third year of the third cycle. Two hun- dred and eighty days after the execution of the king Ahpozotzil he hanged Chuvy Tziquinu .. . on the day 4 Can [page 190]. (48) On the day 9 Ah was completed the fourth year of the third cycle after the revolt. .. . On the day 2 Tihax . . . the wife of Tunatiuh was drowned. One hundred and sixty days after this disaster there arrived our fathers of St. Dominic . . on the day 12 Batz [page 190]. (49) On the day 8 Ah was completed the 13th year of the third cycle. ... Ahtzil Juan Perez . . . died on the day 12 Tihax. Eighty days after ... there was an eruption of the mountain Chigag . . . on the day 9 Ah . . . On the day 12 Ah was completed the 16th year of the third cycle [page 192]. (50) Died the chief Don Francisco Ahpozotzil . . . on the day 1 Can,a Monday, the 14th day of the month October [page 193]. (51) On the day 6 Ah was completed the 18th year of the third cycle. ... In the 13th month the day of Sanctiago occurred on the day 1 Tziquin. . . . On that day was inaugurated . . . the Emperor Don Peliphe. . . . The day St. Francis [was] the day 7 Camey [pages 193-194]. (52) On the day 3 Ah was completed the 19th year of the third cycle after the revolt. The Alcaldes in the year 1557 were ... The day 5 Ey [was] 20 days before the close of the third cycle. . . . On the day 13 Ah was completed the third cycle . . . in the year 1558 [page 194]. The foregoing notes and quotations contain, it is believed, all the data found in the ‘‘ Annals” throwing any light on the Cakchiquel calendar. but in order that the reader, who may not have the works relating to this calendar at hand, may be furnished with the data necessary to follow me in my discussion, I introduce here a list of the days of this calendar in the order usually given, with those of the Maya calendar placed beside them in corresponding order. bo =I MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [BYH. ANN. 22 ( Days of the Cakchiquel and Maya Calendars Cakchiquel Maya Cakchiquel Maya days days days days 1 Tmox Imix 11 Batz Chuen 2 Ig or Yg Ik 12 Ee Eb 3 Akbal Akbal 13 Ah Ben 4 Kat Kan 14 Yiz Ix 5) Can Chicchan 15 Tziquin Men 6 Camey Cimi 16 Ahmak Cib 7 Queh Manik 17 Noh Caban 8 Kanel Lamat 18 Tihax Ezanab 9 Toh Mulue 19 Caok Cauac 10 Tzii Oc 20 Hunahpu Ahau As the author of the Annals ends the year with the day Ah, it must have begun with Yiz, if there was no arbitrary change in the succession of days. The following condensed calendar is therefore constructed on this basis as a means of counting time: Cakchiquel Calendar NS 1 Araya ager a Sera ITS ee BO Siecle rhe rey tle aoe eS Pa bvalofebhale 22k See Sette acs sO) ay Semen ES oy tell en(ae alse Oe ciljes “f3) SLAIN ake = ne eee oe 8. 0), 245 rit one l2s Ow Lek pole iene 4S NOb PE ee eee a ee CEE May Sa aay Ey ab sh Be Oy BP al@) Op Hb axee ee 2 ee eee sae ay Naty asp a se) Beal ee aT 6: Caokee=- 22. eo (Ibe Ye al Se = eR ARO) ob ati ya) GP lahoharNaylemcesae see eee ih Le tol 0 ee ae ef atl Gy 1 3 il8} SULMOX! See oes see ee. ote BE eB} aie ee all By Wh IB Fh al OMe ee eras eee ashe KO estore tay wale Gy IB} 5 al ake} 2) 1OvANsbal’. S22 2 el222 ees 10) 84 Si 5) SIR G3) ar Seto OMe TRA Gz) rete Speee eS Se Keenan oe 11 Olea Ge WSS ie ee Shes2) Oe cee Ole i @amiee eee oe cee mee ae UPA (IBF if ele ee SY Bye aK 2 ah es 13 Camey ------- Len ens pw ye a ey ee a I ab ahh Aye IB 14 Quehie se feat eet oe Ne te ei a eh alas cy aI IBS Hy [jj Kanel eel see See ee 2 Oe VS lO AS elily SOmedie ee Gals neeiae clans IA No) nie eh es, a acyl oe 3.10 4 Iii a UIP i) al} 7 1 8 et) IGM Wabhy oe Se ene A, bh 12" 36) SIS ie eal Sie Stool) 1B atZearhes a aoe eres ay a eae ye al te 8) a} al), zB all 19 He-_- er ay EE ps a 6 i387 7 cee ee aly Zh lil Gy ak) Ss Ae RT pe A er ae 7 1 SH et ye By eaWie ee alk | tay ales, (a In using this to count forward, we count on to the end of the right- hand column and then go back to the left-hand column. To count backward, the direction is reversed. It will be observed from the quotations given that the years all end with the day Ah, that the numbering of the days is by 1 to 15 as usual, and that the terminal Ahs of the years succeed one another in the following order: 11 Ah, 8 Ah, 5 Ah, ete., giving the descending series 11, 8; 5, 2,12) 95 6513; 135 10s 7.4, 1) Tes tete., the nium ber on ani; given year being 3 less than that of the one which preceded. It is apparent, therefore, that the vear could not have consisted of THOMAS] THE CAKCHIQUEL CALENDAR 279 365 days, that is, of 18 months of 20 days each and 5 added days, for even the supposition that these added days were neither numbered nor counted does not give the order found in the Annals. Nor will Goodman’s supposition that they counted 366 days to the year give this succession, though he counts the system alluded to in the Annals as distinct from the Cakchiquel Annual Calendar. Brinton says: The calendars in use were of two different kinds, the one called qhol kih, lit- erally *‘the valuer or appraiser of days,’’ which was employed exclusively for astrological and divining purposes, to decide on which were lucky and unlucky days, and may kih, *‘ the revolution or recurrence of days,”’ which was for chrono- logical purposes. @ I find no other explanation of a calendar which would end in the manner mentioned in the Annals, than a year of 20 months of 20 days each, or 400 days, the days being numbered in the usual: Mayan method of 1 to 13. Seler? gives this explanation and Goodman also adopts it for their chronological year. That if we count this num- ber of months to the year the different years will end on the same day is evident, and that the day numbers will follow one another in the order mentioned above can be seen by reference to the above condensed calendar. If we count 20 months, the year beginning with 1 Yiz will end with 10 Ah, and the next year will begin with 11 Yiz; or if we commence with the column headed 11, and count 20 months, the year will end with 7 Ah, and the next year will begin with 8 Yiz; if we commence with the column headed 8, and count 20 months, the year will end with 4 Ah, ete. This appears to be the only explanation of this singular calendar, if we suppose the annalist to be correct in his statements as to the dates on which the years ended. As proof that the annalist counted 400 days to the year we have the following evidence from the above quotations: By number 1, we learn that the Revolt, which he takes as the beginning of his era, took place on 11 Ah; by number 5 we see that the first year of the Revolt ended on 8 Ah; in number 4 it is stated that ‘‘One year less ten days after the reyolt was hanged the chief orator Ahmoxnoy, on the day 11 Akbal.” The day 11 Akbal will occur twice only in the ordinary year of 565 days, and twice only in the year of 400 days. As the Revolt occurred on 11 Ah, the first year thereafter must have begun with the day 12 Yiz. The day 11 Akbal would occur first at the end of 6 months and 10 days—or 130 day That 10 days added to this could not have completed the year will be conceded. The next occurrence of 11 Akbal would be at the end of 19 months and 10 days, or 390 days, 10 days more reaching the day 8 Ah, the end of the first year. Although neither 140 nor 400 days correspond with any natural phenomena it is safe to assume that 400 days was the period the annalist referred to and not 140 days. a Annals of the Cakchiquels, Philadelphia, 1885, p. 31. > Transactions Berlin Anthropological Soctety, June, 1889. s. 280 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 In number 15 it is stated that 12 days were lacking to complete the tenth year after the Revolt, ete., on the day 8 Imox; and in number 16 that the day 7 Ah completed the 10th year. As it is stated in number 14+ that 10 Ah was the end of the 9th year after the Revolt, 8 Imox would occur 128 and 388 days thereafter. Counting 12 days from the latter brings us to 7 Ah and gives 400 as the number of days in the year. This result must be accepted, or we must decide that the year consisted of only 140 days, which is unreasonable. In num- ber 24 it is stated that 9 Ah completed the 18th year after the Revolt, and in number 26 that 8(?) Ah completed the 19th year (that this should be 6 Ah is evident, as 9 Ah precedes and 3 Ah (number 27) follows it). In number 25, which relates to the 19th year, it is stated that on the day 3 Caok the doves passed over the city of Iximche; and that 100 days after the doves had been seen the locusts came, on the day 2 Yg (or Ik). Now, the first occurrence of 3 Caok in the 19th year after the Revolt, that is, the year following 9 Ah (the year begin- ning with 10 Yiz), is 2 months and 6 days after the commencement of the year. One hundred days more bring us to 12 Caok, the 6th day of the 8th month, or 7 months and 6 days from the commence- ment of the year. This is not the day given, but counting 4 days more we reach 2 Yg or Ik, the day named. As 100 is a round num- ber, the 104 may be assumed as correct. As this, even if the number be limited to 100, gives more than 140 days in this year we have evi- dence that a year of 400 days was counted by the annalist. In numbers 31 and 32, and two or three items not given in the quotations, we have conclusive evidence that 400 days were counted to the year by the Annals. They are as follows: 1 Ah completed the 5th year of the second cycle (25th year) after the revolt (page 171). In the following year, ending on 11 Ah, Hunyg died on 12 Camey. (ibid. Brinton’s translation gives 14 Camey, butthis is wrong, as there could be no 14 Camey; the original says 12). 100 days after was the day 1 Can (page 173). 20 days later was 10 Queh (page 175). The day 11 Imox follows in this year (ibid.). The day 9 Batz occurs after this same year (ibid.). The year ends on 11 Ah (ibid.). As the preceding year ended on 1 Ah, this year began with 2 Yiz, and 12 Camey would be the 13th day of the 12th month. One hun- dred and twenty days more (or exactly 119) and not 100, as the annalist says, would reach 1 Can, the 12th day of the 16th month; 22 days more would reach 10 Queh, the 14th day of the 17th month. The day 11 Imox would be the 8th day of the 18th month, and 9 Batz the 18th day of the 20th month, just two days before 11 Ah, the close of the year. THOMAS] THE CAKCHIQUEL CALENDAR 281 In the year following 5 Ah (number 34), that is to say, the year beginning with 6 Yiz, the following events, with dates, are mentioned (numbers 35, 36, and 37): On 1 Ganel the Quiches were destroyed. On 4 Quat the chiefs were burned by Tunatiuh (Alvarado). On 1 Hunahpu the Spaniards reached Iximche. Five days after, Tunatiuh left the capital; then the Tzutuhils were con- quered on 7 Camey. Twenty-five days afterward Tunatiuh went forth to Cuzcatan and slew Atacat on the day 2 Queh. On 10 Hunahpu he returned, having been absent 40 days. Iximche was abandoned on 7 Amak. Ten days after, on 4 Camey, Tunatiuh began war. One hundred and eighty days after the city was abandoned the 29th year after the revolt was completed on 2 Ah. fi The day 1 Ganel (or Kanel) was the 15th day of the 2d month; 4 Quat (or Kat) was the 11th day of the 3d month; 1 Hunahpu the 7th day of the 5th month. ‘‘Five days after” should be 6 to reach 7 Camey, the 13th day of the 5th month. ‘‘ Twenty-five days after- wards” (after 7 Camey) should be 21 to reach 2 Queh, 14th day of the 6th month, and 10 Hunahpu is the 7th day of the 10th month, hence he 40 days, if counted from 2 Queh, would be wrong. The 7 Amak would be the 3d day of the 12th month, and 4 Camey the 15th day ‘of the 12th month. From 7 Amak, the day Iximche was abandoned, to 2 Ah, the end of the year (still counting 400 days), was only 177, the round number given by the annalist being 180. These items of evidence are sufficient to prove, beyond any reason- able doubt, that the annalist counted 400 days to the year, and that the years of the calendar which he used always began with the day Yiz. The beginning and ending days of the years would therefore be as follows if we start with 12 Yiz, the first year after the Revolt: Beginning day Ending day Beginning day Ending day Yiz Ah Yiz Ah 12 8 1 10 9 5 1 7 6 2 8 4 3 12 5 1 13 9 2 alk! 10 6 12 8 it 3 and so on. 4 13 The next question that arises, and the one of most importance in the discussion, is this: Was the writer justified in indicating that such a calendar as this was in use among the Cakchiquels at the coming of the Spaniards? On this point we must judge chiefly by internal evidence. As what is known in regard to the history of the manu- seript is given by Brinton in his introduction, it is unnecessary to 282 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 repeat it here. The writer claims to have been a descendant (grand- son) of the ruling chief of the Cakchiquels at the time of the arrival of the Spaniards, and was then a youth of probably some 16 or 18 years. Judging by his method of giving dates, he seems to have been familiar with a calendar then in use. Moreover his station would indicate that he had been trained in the study of the chronology of his tribe. I am, therefore, inclined to accept as substantially cor- rect his statements so far as they bear on the calendar system, though the traditional portion may be of very little or no historical value. If this view be accepted, it may throw some light on one troublesome feature of the Maya calendar—the introduction of the multiple 18 in counting the months. Why the change from the lunar period toa period of twenty days to the month was made, is not easily accounted for, except on the supposition that, having decided for ceremonial or other reason to abandon the lunar count, it was natural to follow the vigesimal system, hence the 20 days to the month, 20 months to the year, and 20 years to the cycle or ahau. The necessity, however, for some adjustment between the ceremonial and true year brought about at length the adoption of 18 months and 5 added days, and the sub- stitution of 18 in place of 20 in time numeration. It seems possible, if the annalist be correct in his time count, that the peculiar native calendar may have come into use somewhat in this way. I can find no grounds whatever for Goodman’s assertion that the calendar year of the Cakchiquels consisted of 366 days. They may be in a historical mention which I have failed to find, but by no possible means can this year be made to agree with the calendar of the Annals without assuming an arbitrary break in the succession of the days at the end of each year. MAYA METHOD OF CALCULATION As I have, in my paper on the ‘‘ Mexican and Central American Numeral Systems,” brought up the question, How did the Maye priests actually perform their calculations relating to time series, some of them reaching into millions? I propose to discuss the subject somewhat more at length here. As was stated in that paper, these calculations sometimes required changing series of days, chuens, ahaus, katuns, cycles, and even great cycles (or more correctly units of the Ist, 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th, and even the 6th order in the vigesimal sys- tem), to years, months, and days, reaching from one given date to another. As such ealeulations could not possibly have been made mentally, the authors of the inscriptions and codices must have had some method of ‘‘ ciphering,” to use a school-boy term, or of making the calculation by marking on some object. As was stated in the paper referred to, the only allusion to the subject by an early author- ity, so far as is known, is the statement by Landa that they performed them ‘on the ground or some flat thing.” «Nineteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. a THOMAS] MAYA METHOD OF CALCULATION 283 As the different kinds of symbols used by the Mayas to express numbers have been referred to, I assume that the reader is familiar withthem. That direct multiplication and division would seem to be impossible with their characters where both numbers included units above the first order, or, at most, first and second orders, will be admitted. The suggestion by Professor McGee (referred to in the paper on numeral systems) that these operations might have been performed by addition and subtraction seems to be the key to the prob- lem, as I shall attempt to show. That the Mayas could add and subtract numbers expressed in the ordinary numeral symbols (dots and short lines) is known from hun- dreds of examples in the Dresden codex; and that for these characters they could readily substitute equivalent symbols of other forms in use is evident. Take, for illustration, part of a series from plate XXIV, Dresden codex (see plate LXXXII), which has been reversed, so that it isto be taken from left to right instead of from right to left, as in the original. The date below each column is written out, and instead of the naught symbol a cipher (0) is inserted: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 9Ahau 4 Ahau 12 Ahau 7 Ahau 2 Ahau 10 Ahau lf we write these in Arabic figures, preserving the relative positions and omitting the dates, as those given can be referred to, the series will be as follows: 1 1 2 2 8 16 4 12 0 8 2 4 6 5 (8) 10 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 Doubling the first column (8-2-0) we get 16-4-0; adding again 8-2-0, we get 1-4-6-0; adding again 8-2-0, we get 1-12-8-0 (the 5 in this column should be 8, as by adding 8-2-0 to it as thus corrected we get 2-0-10-0, the 5th column, ete.). If we write the equivalent of each number in days, maintaining the same relative positions, and give the sum of each column below (nak- ing the correction noted), the result will be as follows: 7,200 7, 200 14, 400 14, 400 2,880 5, 760 1, 440 4, 320 0 2, 880 40 80 120 160 200 240 0 0 0 0 0 0 2, 920 5, 840 8, 760 11, 680 14, 600 17,520 284 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS _ [ETH ANN. 22 By adding 2,920 to the first, we obtain the sum of the second column; and adding the same number to the sum of the second, we obtain the sum of the third, and so on. By counting forward 2,920 days from 9 Ahau, the date under the first column, we reach 4 Ahau, the date under the 2nd column, ete. These primary steps are, of course, well understood by readers who have given any attention to the subject, but it is necessary to present them as leading up to the object in view in the discussion. It is evident that * + , or 2,920, is the factor or added number used 0) in this series, but the process is carried on by addition. Towever, before we proceed, it is necessary to call to mind certain facts in rela- tion to the calendar. The first is that a day of any given name returns at every 20th day, whether we count backward or forward, but not with the same number; the second, that any given day returns with the same day number at every 260th day, whichever way we count, but not in the same month nor on the same day of the month beyond the first year. As each count reaches Ahau in this instance, and 260 is not an even divisor of 2,920, the basal factor must be 20, and the day numbers will be different, as we find them to be. Although we may not be able always to state why particular factors or counters are selected, yet in this case it would seem that 2,920 was chosen because this is exactly the number of days in eight years. As the dates are therefore just eight years apart, they necessarily fall in years having the same dominical day, and, consequently, on the same day of the month. However, these specific features must be understood as applicable to this particular series, and not as of general application, for we shall find series in which there is no reference to the year; but these time periods have a bearing on the practical method used in Maya calculations. Now, let us see theoretically how, starting with a given date, the initial date of a high series may be reached. Nine cycles and the lower fractional numbers, counting from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu as the initial date, form the most frequent series of the Copan and Quirigua inscriptions. We willtry to form such a series, selecting at random 3 Chicchan 18 Yax, year 1 Lamat, as the terminal date, and 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu as the initial date. As the former date must be the more recent on this supposition, it follows that the count was backward (though this is by no means necessary, as it could be forward as well); so our count in this case will be backward. In order not to make the series too long and tedious, we will select as our factor or sum to be added— BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT PL. LXxxil PLATE XXIV OF THE DRESDEN CODEX THOMAS] MAYA METHOD OF CALCULATION 285 This represents a calendar round or cycle of 52 years (18,980 days), the given date (3 Chicchan 18 Yax) returning at the end of this period. For convenience we make the series ascending toward the right, and after a few additions double the columns to make progress more rapid. The usual rule is followed; the counter is given as the first column; the columns are numbered as a means of reference. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) see 40 eee 0 The counter or first column is added to itself, or doubled, to form the second; the first is added to the second to form the 3rd; the first to the 5rd to form the 4th; but. to hasten the process they are doubled successively from this point to the 8th. As doubling the 8th would raise the number above that contemplated, only the number necessary to give the 9 cycles is added, but this must be the counter (first column) or a multiple of it. The required number is found in the 45th column; this added to the 8th gives the 9th. The sum of the 9th column, if no mistake has been made, should, counting back from 3 Chiechan 18 Yax, bring us again to the same date. As acount of a cycle of 52 years (our first column) includes the entire series of days and day numbers known to the system, 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu must be contained therein, and the count to it from the date reached must be less than the amount represented by our first column. Our next step, therefore, is to ascertain the lapse of time from our last date (8 Chiechan 18 Yax) to the next preceding occur- rence (as we are counting backward) of 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu. Just what method the authors of the inscriptions and codices employed for this purpose, as there are more than one, I can not state positively, but give one which I am satisfied they could follow. They could readily ascertain, as is shown by almost every numeral series with a date, that the day 3 Chiechan 18 Yax fell in the year 1 Lamat, and 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu in the year 8 Ben; hence they could easily tell, by counting on their fingers or making marks, that from the latter to the former is 18 years and the fractions of the two years— the fraction in the former being 198 days or, , , and in the latter 17 or= As the year is represented by ( the 18 years would be 286 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 By adding to this the , , , and +—, or together ____, we obtain the sum represented by —_. Add this to the 9th column, the result is the following number, to wit: **** or 9 eyeles, 10 katuns, 14 ahaus, 15 chuens, 5 days. If no mistake has been made, this number, if we count back from 3 Chicchan 18 Yax, year 1 Lamat, should bring us to 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, the first day of Goodman’s so-called 54th great cycle. Trial proves it to be correet, thus: Days OVNGY CLES ioe = mn ee ee ae © ee, SC re ee 1, 296, 000 Oey GUTS ae ee re ene See a ae ee 72,000 ddvahianus* a 2 ae 2 =e ots Ce ON Fee ie ere oer 5, 040 dSACHUCNS. seca 5S Hae ee a Oe eee eee nae 300 Os ay See cp 2 ot Tas Shape eee ee Ln ee 5 AN c\it2) Us aeectarn teen eae Sk Perna Sy a See 8 BB YoRDY oa Subtract 72 calendar rounds_ ~ Aut 5s Se ee a 1, 366, 560 Remainder - we bos eee 542) 0D 6, 785 Counting back this number of days from 3 Chiechan 18 Yax brings us to 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu. Turning to Goodman’s ‘* Chronolog- ical Calendar,” 54th great cycle, 9th cycle, 10th katun, and 14th ahau, we find the date is 10 Ahau 18 Mae. Fifteen months and 5 days from this just reaches 5 Chicchan 18 Yax. The series is there- fore a correct one, formed upon the same plan as those of the Dresden codex, and without using anything not in the reach and comprehen- sion of the aboriginal artist. The series on plate XXIV of the Dresden codex (our plate LXXxXTT) appears to close with a minor addition (in the lower left-hand corner) to reach the desired date, just as the theoretic one given above, ex- cept that in this case the count is forward. The series includes the right half of the plate, and reads from right to left and by lines from the bottom upward, closing with the lines in the lower left-hand corner. Ilere the steps have been in part from 1 Ahau to 1 Ahau, hence with 260 as the primal factor. The last column is 9—9-16-0-0, then follows the number 6-2-0, 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu. The latter number changed into days is the lapse of time from 1 Ahau 18 Kayab, the last preceding date, to+ Ahau8 Cumhu. However, as there are some unusual features in regard to the additions in a part of this series, at- tention will again be called to it a little farther on. THOMAS] MAYA METHOD OF CALCULATION 287 In order to show that resort was had to increasing the added num- ber to shorten the process, as was done in the theoretic example, the following example is given from plates LXX and LXxI of the Dresden codex. Ordinary numerals are used in place of the symbols, and the series, which in the codex ascends from right to left, is reversed; the days below the columns are also given: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 3 5) 7 9 15 17 19 18 17 16 15 10 9 9 0 0 0 0 16 18 0 0 0 0 0 9 Oc 9 Eb 9 Ix 9 Ix OW Ex: 9 Ix 9 Ix It will be seen by subtracting that the difference between the first and second columns and between the second and third is 1-17-2, or 1 ahau, 17 chuens, 2 days, equal to 702 days, while the difference between the 3d and 4th columns is 2—18—9—-0, or 2 katuns, 18 ahaus, 9 chuens, 0 days—equal to 21,060 days; and that the difference between the 4th and 5th, the 5th and 6th, and the 6th and 7th is, in each case, 1-19-0-0, or 14,040 days. There is therefore an increase of the added number or factor in passing from the 3d to the 4th column. It will be noticed that the days below the Ist, 2d, and 3d columns differ, while from this point onward they are all 9 Ix. The change in this respect requires a change in the counter. Why the counter was made larger in passing from the 3d to the 4th column than between the remaining columns is not clear, as the difference between the 3d and 4th columns would have reached the desired day, 9 Ix. It is possible that the month date, though it does not appear, was here taken into consideration. . Assuming that the first 9 Ix (under the 3d column) was 9 Ix 2 Pop, year 8 Ben, the count forward of 1-19-0-0 would reach 9 Ix 12 Chen in the year 7 Akbal, while the count for- ward of 2-18-9-0 would reach 9 Ix 17 Mac, year 13 Ezanab. As the first counter (702) is not a multiple of 260 or of 20, it must have been based on 13, one of the factors of 260. The counters 14040 and 21060 are multiples of 260; and there is possibly something in the fact that the former (14040) is 54 times 260 and that the first counter (702) is 54 times 13. Although we are not able at present to solve all these problems, it is evident that the author of the codex increased the counter as he proceeded, presumably to shorten the process. The series appears to close with two columns in the upper middle portion of plate LXx, the dates here having the month given. With these (notwithstanding the obliterated portion of the series) we might determine the true dates of the portion given above, and thus possibly solye, to some extent, the problems mentioned; but unfortunately there are so many errors in these two columns that it seems impossi- ble to determine the true numbers and dates. The chuen number, or 288 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 number in the place of the second order of units, is 18 or 19 (there being a space where one dot may have been obliterated), either of which is wrong. The date below one is 9 Ix 20 Pop, the other is 9 Ix 15 Pax or Tzee, both of which are wrong, as Ix is never the 13th or 20th of the month. A good example of this method of increasing the counter as the series proceeds is found on plates LXX-LXxuI of the same codex. Although this runs from right to,left, we give it here in reverse order and in ordinary figures as follows: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) [17] 3 6 9 B} 16 19[1?] ia) 10 15 0 5 10 4 Caban 41k 4 Manik 4 Eb 4 Caban 4 Ik (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 8 val 14 17 3 15 0 5 10 15 0 4 Manik 4 Eb 4 Caban 4 Ik 4 Manik 4 Eb (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) 2 2 2 2 3 6 9 11 [122] 16 1 5 10 15 0 5 4 Caban 41k 4 Manik 4 Eb 4 Caban (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) 3 3 3 3 33 4 it 11 14 17 10 15 0 5 10 41k 4 Manik 4 Eb 4 Caban 4 Ik (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) 4 4 4 4 4 2 6 9 12 15 15 0 5 10 15 4 Manik 4 Eb 4 Caban 41k 4 Manik (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) ) 3 5 10 15 0 0 1 2 3 8 12 0 0 0) 0 0 4 Eb 4 Eb 4 Eb 4 Eb 4 Eb (33) (34) (35) (36) (37) 1 4 5 6 8 0 0 1 i 1 12 16 2 6 10 é 0 0 0 0 0 4 Eb 4 Eb 4 Eb 4 Eb 4 Eb The figures in parenthesis are merely arbitrary numbers given to the columns as a means of reference. The counter is 3-5, or 65 days, THOMAS] MAYA METHOD OF CALCULATION 289 from the first to the 28th column; but here a change takes place; the amount at this point, being 5-1-0, or 1,820 days, is doubled to form the 29th column, and is again added to form the 30th. Here again occurs an increase in the counter, in this case a large one, viz, to 1-5-5-0, or 9,100 days; but at the next step the added number to form the 52nd column is only 1-0-0, or 7,280 days, just one-half of the 31st col- umn. This counter is used to the end of the series; however, the 8 in the 36th column is an evident mistake; it should be 7. The number 65 is a very common counter in this and other codices; in this case 13 is the basal factor. In the other counters 260 is the permanent factor. The first counter, which is just one-fourth of the second, always reaches a day with the same number, though not the same day—but repeating by series of four. However, aside from these questions, we have the fact of the increase of the counter in the proc- ess, to show which was the object of calling attention to the series. Returning now to the series on plate XXIV (our piate LXXII), to which reference has been made, I call attention to the unusual changes in the counter or added number. The series in the fourth tier from the bottem, given in the way adopted above, is as follows: (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 1 4 9 5 5 12 11 14 5 8 7 4 0 0 0 0 1 Ahau 1 Ahau 1 Ahau 1 Ahau The values of the different units and sums of the columns are as follows: 144, 000 7.200 28, 800 64, 800 36, 000 1,800 4,320 3,960 5, 040 100 160 140 80 0 0 0 0 9,100 33, 280 68, 900 185, 120 It will be found by trial that the greatest common divisor of these totals is 260, and that it is contained in the first total 35 times; in the second, 126; in the third, 265, and the fourth, 712 times. Although each step must have required long and tedious additions—no two having a common added number or multiple thereof—and the reason for thus varying the added number is not apparent, yet it is evident that the aboriginal scribe chose 260 as the factor to be used, and also that the desired result could be reached by successive additions. In fact, the series and the others we have noticed seem to be mere records of the steps in the process of determining the lapse of time between two widely separated dates. These examples are sufficient to show that all the series in the codices and inscriptions could have been formed by the aboriginal 292 prH—04——19 290 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN, 22 authors with their numeral symbols by addition and subtraction. It may also be added that the evidence presented to show this is fitted to impress us with the belief that some, if not all, of the series of the Dresden codex are but records of the process of calculation. There arises in connection with this examination a question, the proper answer to which may, if determined in accordance with a view that has been expressed, have an important bearing on the history of the Mayan tribes. On several of the plates of the Dresden codex there are what appear to be supplemental series connecting with the so-called ‘‘ normal date,” 4 Ahau8Cumhu. However, the discussion of this question will come more appropriately under the next section, which relates to the signifi- cation of the series of the inscriptions. SIGNIFICATION OF THE NUMERAL SERIES Why were these series formed? What is their signification? These are questions impossible for us to answer satisfactorily with our pres- ent knowledge of the subject. It may be possible, however, to limit the inquiry by certain considerations. Our first question is, Were they intended, by the initial or terminal days, to refer to actual dates bearing some relation to events in the history of the respective tribes to which they pertain? By the term “initial dates” I allude to the dates from which the series (whether initial or minor) were counted, and by ‘‘terminal dates” to those which follow the series in counting forward. The latter are assumed to be later in actual time than the former. That the initial date may be thrown back any desired distance in time is admitted, as for example, we may take as our initial date the beginning of the Christian era (A. D.), or the supposed initial date of the world era (A. M.), or any other beginning date which, through fancy, tradition, or mythology, has been adopted or arbitrarily chosen by different peoples. It is not necessary, therefore, that we should assume that the initial dates of the Mayan codices and inscriptions have any reference to historical or even supposed historical events. That such an assumption would be preposterous is shown by the fact that several of these dates reach back in time 33,000 years, and a large proportion of those of the inscriptions nearly 4,000 years, and others to a still more distant time. The initial dates must therefore relate, as will be conceded, to some assumed date, traditional or myth- ological, or arbitrarily chosen, according to the fancy of the caleu- lator. Do the terminal dates refer to events or incidents in the history of the tribes—events which were noted down by the seribes sufficiently near the time of occurrence to give the proper or probable dates thereof? THOMAS) SIGNIFICATION OF THE NUMERAL SERIES Oil If we take the terminal dates of the initial series at Quirigua (omit- ting from consideration those of the minor series) we find the differ- ence between the earliest and latest, with two exceptions to be noticed, is only some 83 or 84 years. This difference is so moderate as to be entirely consistent with the idea that the dates were engraved near the time of the events or incidents to which they refer, if, in fact, this was the object in giving them. The two excepted are numbers 6 and 16 of the list given below. The calculation I give is based on what seem to be the reliable series and dates, leaving out of consid- eration the exceptional and doubtful series. Comparing the earliest and latest of those at Copan, we find the difference to be about 222 years. ‘This is by no means extravagant, hence the dates may refer to historical events. When we come to those at Palenque, we find the difference—even excluding the most recent date, which Good- man admits is doubtful—to be over 3,800 years. Although a differ- ence in dates as great or greater than this has been found in the inscriptions of the ruins of Egypt and Assyria and accepted as reason- ably correct, no archeologist of the present day not carried away by some extravagant theory will believe that inscriptions were chiseled at Palenque at dates 5,500 years apart in actual time, the earliest (counting from the coming of the Spaniards) going back more than 2,200 years before the Christian era. Now, it is the opinion of Goodman and Seler that the terminal dates of the inseriptions (the latter excepts those at Palenque, as explained below) refer to the times when the monuments were erected or the inscriptions chiseled. The assertion of the former on this point (pages 147-8) is as follows: ~ Particular emphasis is intended to be laid upon “‘ initial *’ dates in the foregoing estimate. There are two kinds of dates in the Archaic inscriptions. The dates of one character, and those of most frequent occurrence, appear in the body of the texts, and designate the points from or to which the reckonings extend. Some- times they are but a day apart; at others, they are a few months or years, while occasionally a flight is made over thousands of years and back again, with the ease and swiftness with which in Eastern story the couch of the prince is trans- ported by genii. These dates have no significance beyond their relation to other dates and the corresponding reckonings. But with the other class, the initial dates, as Maudslay has very appropriately named them, it is quite different. The inscription on nearly every temple, stela, and altar begins with one of them, reciting the great cycle, cycle, katun, ahau, chuen, month, and day. Such conspicuousness and circumstantiality, inmy esti- mation, could have but a single purpose—that of recording the date at which the monument was erected. Some of the stele have different initial dates on oppo- site sides, but in these instances one date is reckoned from the other, the later one undoubtedly designating the time of dedication. I think there is nothing we can assume with more assurance of certainty than that these initial series mark the date of erection of the respective monuments. Taking this for granted, also, we will turn to the inscriptions and see to what these conclusions lead. The latest initial date is found on a stela at Quirigua. It is 55-3-19-2-1820—7 Ahau-18 Pop. That is 2,840 years subsequent to the 292 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [BTH. ANN. 22 average of initial dates in the other Quirigua inscriptions. The next latest initial date is on a restored stairway in one of the temples of Palenque. It is 55-3-18-12-15 x 12—8 Eb-15 Pop. That is 7,082 years later than the earliest initial dates at Palenque. These are long periods, but the limit is not yet reached. In the museum at Leyden is the misnamed *‘ Yucatec”’ stone, exhumed in digging a cut on the line between British Honduras and Guatemala, about a hundred miles from Copan. Itisaslim slab of jadite, about a foot long and four inches wide, if my recollection of it is correct. Both sides are inscribed in rather a rude man- ner, the rudeness apparently being more attributable to the hardness of the stone than to a lack of skillin the artist. The carving on the front represents a warrior trampling an enemy under his feet. The stone, therefore, is evidently a memo- rial of some victory or conquest. The inscription on the back consists of an ini- tial date in the Archaic form and characters. It is 53-8-14-3-1«12—1 Eb-5 Zac. That is 8,383 years anterior to the latest initial date in Quirigua. Now, if in accordance with my theory respecting the era of the Archaic cities the 2.848 years that have elapsed since that Quirigua date was made be added to the above period, we shall arrive at the time when that ancient Maya conqueror trod his enemies under foot—10,731 years ago—the oldest historical date in the world. Dr Seler’s opinion on this point is expressed in the following quo- tation from his paper in the Zeitschrift fiir Ethnologie, Heft 6, 1899: Thave, in conclusion, now to speak of the relation in which the various monuments which we have become acquainted with stand to each other. Here at the outset is to be kept in mind the noteworthy difference which exists between the altar plates of Palenque and the remaining monuments. I have already mentioned that the initial series of all monuments which we are able to read contain in the first member the multiplier nine; and I can add that the same holds also for the stele of Quirigua (which I have not yet been able to treat of, as they have not yet been pub- lished in Maudslay’s work) and for stela 6 of Copan, excavated by the engi- neers of the Peabody Museum. On the altar plates of Palenque, on the contrary, so far as we have been able to decipher them, there stands in the first member the multiplier one. If, as indeed is a priori most probable, the date designated at the end of the first series gives the time of erection of the monument in ques- tion, then we must conclude that all other monuments within the tenth cycle after the beginning and normal date 4 Ahau 8 Cumku—the Temple of the Cross Il of Palenque, the Temple of the Sun, and perhaps also the Temple of the Cross I—were constructed within the second cycle after the beginning and normal date. In other words, we must conclude that between the time of the erection of the temples of Palenque and of all the other monuments there lies a period of about 3,160 years; that the temples of Palenque are about 3,160 years older than the monuments of Copan and Quirigua, and than the steps of the tow- ering palace of Palenque not far from the temple. This is, in itself, not probable, and all the less so as one would, from the style of the hieroglyphs and figures, be rather inclined to explain the temples of Palenque as younger than the stele of Copan. The solution of the riddle may be a different one. It may be that, in the initial series of the temples of Palenque, the end date does not represent the date of erection of the temple, but an earlier sacred date which it had been determined to bring into view. It may, however, also be that the time of the erection of the monument was brought into view, not through notation of the actual traditionally accepted distance from the normal date, but as it were in arithmetical fashion through notation of one difference which led from the normal date toa day of this name. : The end dates of all the remaining monuments which we are able to read fall, as said, within the tenth cycle after the beginning and normal date 4 Ahan, 8 Cumku. ee eee THOMAS] SIGNIFICATION OF THE NUMERAL SERIES 293 It is apparent from these quotations that both Goodman and Seler hold the opinion that the terminal date in an initial series is intended to indicate the time when the monument was erected, though the lapse of time given by Goodman (who does not seem to object to long periods) to the dates of erection of the various monuments differs very widely from that allowed by Seler. The differences I have indicated are, as was stated above, limited to those which remain after rejecting those which seem doubtful. Let us discuss this question on the data furnished by the inscrip- tions and Dresden codex, taking, where there are not good grounds for objecting to them, the interpretations of the initial series by Good- man and Seler. Differences in the numbers of the periods or orders of units below that which Goodman terms ‘‘ katun” have no bearing in this discussion. In order that the reader may have the data before his eye, I give below a list of the initial series, retaining, for con- venience, Goodman’s great cycle numbers. The numbers at the left are merely for reference. Palenque (1) 53-12-19-13- 4 0, S8Ahau 18 Tzec. Temple of the Cross. (2) 54 1-18— 5—- 3-6, 138 Cimi 19 Ceh. Temple of the Sun. (8) b4= T18— 5— 4— 0;) 1 Ahan 13’ Mac: Temple of the Foliated Cross. (4) 54 9- 4 0- 0O- 0, 13 Ahau 18 Yax. Temple of Inscriptions. (5) 55- 3-18-12-15-12, 8 Eb 15 Pop. Inscribed steps of palace. Quirigua (6) 54 9- 1- 0-0-0, 6Ahau 13 Yaxkin. Stela C, west side. (7) 54 9-14-13- 4-17, 12 Caban 5 Kayab. Stela F, west side. (8) 54 9-14-13- 4-17, 12 Caban 5 Kayab. Stela E, west side. (9) 54- 9-16- 5- 0-0, 8 Ahau 8 Zotz. Stela J, back. (10) 54- 9-16-10- 0- 0, 1 Ahau 3 Zip. Stela F, east side. (11) 54 9-16-13- 417, 8Caban 5 Yaxkin. Stela D, west side. (12) 54 9-17-10- 0- 0, 12 Ahau 8 Pax. Animal B. (13) 54- 9-17- 5- 0-0, 6 Ahau 13Kayab. Stela A, east side. (14) 54- 9-17-15- 0-0, 5 Ahau 3 Muan. Animal G. (15) 54 9-18-15- 0-0, 3 Ahau ax Stela K. (16) 54-13- 0- 0-0-0, 4Ahau 8 Cumhu. Stela C. (17) 54 9-16-15- 0- 0. 7 Ahau 18 Pop. Stela D, east side. Copan (18) 54- 9- 5-5- 0-0, 4Ahau = 13 Zotz. Stela D. (19) 54 9- 9-10- 0-0, 2Ahau 13 Pop. Stela P. (20) 54— 9-12- 3-14- 0, 5 Ahau 8 Uo. Stela I. (21) 54 9-12-12- 0- 0, 1 Ahau 8 Zotz. Stela J, west side. (22) 54- 9-12-16—- 7- 8, 3Lamat 16 Yax. Altar K. 23) 54- 9-13-10- 0- 0, (7 Ahau 13 Cumbhu.) Stela J, east side. (24) 54—- 9-14-10- 0-0, 5 Ahau 3 Mac. Stela F. (25) 54- 9-14-19- 8-0, 12 Ahau 18 Cumhu. Stela A. (26) 54- 9-15- 0- 0-0, 4Ahau 15 Yax. Stela B. (27) 54- 9-15- 0- 0-0, 4Ahau 13 Yax. Altar 8. (28) 54- 9-16-10- 0-0, 1 Ahau 8 Zip. Stela N. (29) 54 9-16- 5- 0-0, 8 Ahau 8 Zotz. Stela M. (30) 55- 2- 6— 0- 0- 0, ? ? Altar L. (31) 55-13- 2-18- 0-0, 6Ahau 18 Kayab. StelaC. 294 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS [ETH. ANN. 22 The Leyden Stone (82) 7538=18—14 23 = 119 abr 5 2?(Yaxkin?). Goodman also mentions (p. 148) the following as at Quirigua: (33) 55- 3-19- 2- 0-0, 7Ahau 18 Pop. Stela ? Examining this list, we see that the terminat dates of 24 out of the 33 series fall in the 10th (Goodman’s 9th) eyele from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, the initial day of Goodman’s 54th great eyele. It can not be doubted, therefore, as we also find the same initial date the most prominent one in the Dresden codex, that, for some reason unknown to us, it was selected by the people who made the inscriptions and codex as their principal era date. As the 24 series ending in the 10th cycle run back from the earliest terminal date (number 6) 9-1-0-0-0, or 3,570 years, and from the latest terminal date (number 15) 9-18-15—0-0, or 3,920 years, it is evident, as has been stated above, that the normal date (4 Ahau 8 Cumhu) selected as the commencement of this era could have no reference to an historical event remembered by the Mayan people. Even if we suppose that the last of these inscriptions was not chiseled until the close of the fifteenth century, this would carry back the era date 2,400 years before the Christian era. The only safe and reasonable conclusion, therefore, is that the initial date was arbitrarily selected for some mythological, mystical, or arithmetical reason. It is especially worthy of notice, however, that the lapse of time between the terminal dates of the earliest and latest of these series is only about 350 years, and, if number 6 be omitted, less than 90 years. This fact would seem to give color to the suggestion of Goodman and Seler that the terminal dates of the initial series refer to the time the monu- ments were erected. Nevertheless, there are some serious difficulties to be overcome before this theory can be considered as satisfactorily established, some of which it will be my object now to point out. So far as the foregoing list is concerned, all the series which begin with 9 eyeles (the 54 indicating the so-called great cycle is omitted from consideration) have, beyond question, the initial date 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu. It must be remembered, however, that this date returns at the end of every count of 18,980 days, or 52 years. Now, the ques- tion arises (and it is a crucial one in this discussion), Does the count in each one of these series go back to identically the same 4 Ahau 8 Cumnhu, or merely to any 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu? If, as I think I have sue- cessfully shown, the so-called ahaus, katuns, cycles, and great cycles are not absolute time periods, recognized as such in any Mayan time system, but are mere orders of units in the Mayan method of numera- tion, these counts would be precisely like the following in our ordinary time system: Thursday the 15th day of the 7th month of the 48th year of the century. Whatcentury? Or 1,025 years, 7 months and 15 days from December 25th to Thursday the 9th day of the 8th month. It is evident that without the first or last date being fixed in some recog- THOMAS] SIGNIFICATION OF THE NUMERAL SERIES 295 nized calendar the 1,025 years, etce., may be pushed backward or for- ward at will. Hence a Mayan scribe may write 9-15-0-0-0 from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu to 4 Ahau 13 Yax (asin number 26); and 52 years later another may write the same series, as in number 27, and both will be strictly correct, but the 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu of the first will be 52 years earlier than that of the second. The mere fact, therefore, that 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu is reached by counting back the different numeral series is not evidence that in each case identically the same 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu is reached. Other evidence having some bearing on the question must be introduced to establish this identity. The only faet apparent in the series themselves which seems to favor the theory of identity is that each runs back 9 eycles plus the minor numbers. This undoubtedly favors the theory of identical date. Let us turn now to the Dresden codex, and give attention to what I have termed subsidiary series; that is to say, short series ap- parently, as was suggested in the theoretical series given above, intended to connect with 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu. As I have expressed doubts as to the correctness of Seler’s suggestion about that on plate LXIX, attention is called to the long compound series on plate XXIV (see our plate LXXx). This series begins at the right-hand edge of the bottom section and runs leftward to the middle; it then passes to the next section above, and so on to the top of the page, the conclud- ing column being that in the lower division of the left-hand portion. No months are given except at the bottom of the long number col- umns and the one short column in the lower left-hand portion of the plate. The last date standing in the lower left-hand corner is 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, and over it is the number series 6-2-0 (the 0 symbol in a red loop). The next date to the right is 1 Ahau 18 Kayab; this stands under the numeral series 9—9-16-0-0. Counting back from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, the short series, 6 ahaus, 2 chuens, 0 days, or 2,200 days, we are brought to 1 Ahau 18 Kayab, while if we count forward from the same date it brings us to 7 Ahau 18 Cumhu, which shows the backward count to be the correct one, if the design of the artist was to connect the two series; moreover, the count of the long series, if made toward the right, is backward. We know that in all the series given in the above list, where 4 Ahau 8 Cumbhu is the principal date, it is the initial day and the numeral series follows it; in other words, the count must be backward to reach it. Taking number 15 of the list—Stela K of Quirigua— 54-9-18-15-0-O—we find that the terminal date lies 5,920 years subse- quent to 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu. Turning to the last column of the series on plate xxtv of the Dresden codex, which is 9-9-16—-0-0, we find that the count, when the short series of 2,200 days is added, reaches back- ward from 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu 3,750 years. In other words, we count forward in the codex 3,750 years to 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, and in the inscription series forward from this date 5,920 years, making the total 296 MAYAN CALENDAR SYSTEMS (ETH. ANN, 22 lapse of time from the beginning date of one and the ending date of the other 7,670 years. Is it at all probable that the one 4 Ahau 8 Cumbhu is the same in actual time as the other? That the count is necessarily forward in the codex series may be proved thus: The last column (that in the lower left-hand portion) reaches back to the initial date, which is found to be 1 Ahau 18 Kayab, the same as the terminal date which stands below the column. Now if the supposi- tion be correct that, as is usual in this codex, this column is the sum of the series, and there is no mistake on the part of the aboriginal artist, the first number column, that in the extreme lower right-hand corner of the plate, 8-2-0, 9 Ahau (the symbol appears to be 8, but the fourth dot is hid by the red border line, as can easily be shown by the steps from date to date toward the left) should give the exact lapse of time from 1 Ahau 18 Kayab. Counting forward 8-2-0, or 2,920 days, from 1 Ahau 18 Kayab, year 2 Akbal, we reach 9 Ahau 18 Kayab, year 10 Akbal, the date under this first column. Counting forward 2,920 days (the difference between the first column and the next one to the left) from the last date (9 Ahau 18 Kayab), we reach 4 Ahau 18 Kayab, year 5 Akbal, the date under the second column. Counting back the sum of this second column—5,540 days—we reach, as we should, 1 Ahau 18 Kayab, the initial date. As further proof that the series is continuous and the count for- ward, let us select at random the third column, counting from the right, of the third section from the bottom, to wit, 4-8-0, 11 Ahau. Counting forward 52,120 days, the sum of this column, from 1 Ahau 18 Kayab, we reach 11 Ahau 15 Kayab, year 12 Akbal—the day under this column. If we take the column immediately above (third from the right in the fourth division from the bottom of the page) which reads 9-11-7-0, 1 Ahau, equal to 68,900 days, and count forward from the initial date 1 Ahau 18 Kayab, we reach 1 Ahau 13 Mae, year 9 Lamat. Subtracting this column from that to the left of it— 1-5-14- £0 9-11- 7-0 16— 2-15-0 we find the remainder to be 16—2-15-0, or 116,220 days. Counting for- ward this number of days from 1 Ahau 15 Mac, the date under the third column from the right, we reach 1 Ahau 18 Uo, year 3 Akbal, the date under the last or fourth column from the right, which proves the steps thus far taken to be correct. Although the upper division is too nearly obliterated for any of its columns to be:used to caleulate forward to the final column, we can do this as correctly by subtracting the last column of the fourth division from the terminal column of the entire series, thus— 9-9-16— 0-0 1-5-14— 4-0 8-4 1-140 ae ee THOMAS] SIGNIFICATION OF THE NUMERAL SERIES 297 Using this remainder, which amounts to 1,151,440 days, subtracting from it 62 calendar rounds or 1,176,760 days, which leaves a balance of 4,680 days, and counting forward from 1 Ahau 18 Uo (the date under the left column of the fourth division), we reach 1 Ahau 18 Kayab, the date under the final column in the lower left portion of the plate. No doubt, therefore, is left that the count in this long series is toward the left and forward in time, and that the 1 Ahau 18 Kayab under the final column is 3,744 years later in time than the initial date, which is also 1 Ahau 18 Kayab. Counting forward from this terminal date the short series in the extreme lower left-hand column (2,200 days), we reach 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu, the date in the corner below this short column. It is certain, therefore, that 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu is the terminal date of the long series on this plate. Is it the ‘‘normal date,” the same initial 4 Ahau 8 Cumhu from which the series of in- 8 oh @ scriptions are counted? To show that Goodman’s cal- culations agree exactly with this result, we have only to count back on his chronological tables from 4 Ahau & 8 Cumhu, the first day of his 54th great cycle, the 9 ed eyeles, 9 katuns and 16 ahaus of the final large col- == umn and the 6 ahaus of the short column. This will ae reach 2 Ahau 13 Pop, the first day of the 18th ahau == of the 9th katun of the 3rd cycle of his 53rd great .. 2255 seen ese eee 204, 234 Califomia, field) workin 2 222.5. -2-----26 ix stone objects from, purchase of --. XXXix Cahada, field workin) ss. 222-2. seese-se ix, xiii See also British Columbia. Canals for irrigation, used by Pueblo Indians, remains of oe 178 Canes, gaming, from Cheylon, cutsshowing 101 Canoes, birch-bark, Indian use of, study io aasnonce Sane on Aseee cite xXi-XXiii Canteens from pueblo ruins, forms of ...__. 64 Carapaces of turtles from pueblo ruins, escriptiomote sass sseee nee eee 95 -Carrizo, Ariz., ruins near, mention of ...... 19 (Carroll) JohuiJ:, workiOfe=-.--seoen- sees xii | Casa Grande, people of, relations of, to people of Verde yalley......... 34 Castantieda (de Nagera), P. de, on cremation among Pueblo Indians ......... 176 on stone balls found in pueblo ruins... 183 Cavate ruins near Flagstaff, classes of... --- 35 descriptions of, published .............. 35 NewiCaves!O£ 2272s: so. se- sence 37-38 Old:cavesiofs.- 2-2 s -<-%a0-=> 159 Filfot, wide range of, among American SDOPIPIMES! Woes cas- oc ee Xv-xvi Financial statement..............-....- xlii-xliii Finger rings, shell, from pueblo ruins in Arizona, discovery of.-.-.-..--- 91 Flagstaff, Ariz., cavate ruins near.........- 35 cayate ruins near, descriptions pub- NISHEdOfaes see ene sececeee-tne tee 35 INEWICHVERODimensocct cc atee ee at ta oct 37-38 Oldicaves Ofaseaa 2-2 esses cece == 36-37 Turkey Tank caves of.....-.-.-.--- 38-39 CWS! OD et anes sce I-VI Fleas, sand, plague of, a possible cause of abandonment of pueblos ....--. 22 Fletcher, Alice C., field work by, among tHe PAWCCS aoe cena emcees ae xiv office work by, on Pawnee ritual of the PIQKOSecsece scams eas xXxxvii record of Hako ceremony obtained by, characterization of report on... xliv Floods, a possible cause of abandonment of pueblos on Little Coloradoriver 22 Floor and roof construction at Homolobi, manner of 110 Flute ceremony of Pueblo Indians, refer- SUCOLOMSses- eee eee 18 Foliated Cross at Palenque, face numerals OUP ValuGIOf sosae sees see ee 219 Food, remnants of, in mortuary bowls at ruined pueblos on Little Colo- TAC OILY CL jane ne anes te coenee sce 101 Food bowls. See Bowls. Footprints, human, representations of, on : Pueblo pottenyeot =... -----+-= =.= 106 Great cycle in Mayan chronology, dis sion of numerical value of... symbols for, figures showing ..... 264, 266, 298 Hako ritual of the Pawnees, work of Miss Fletcher on......... xiv, XXxvii, xliv Hales, H., pottery collected by ........... 180 Haliotus shells, Pueblo articles made of ... 92 Hardy, Ariz., ruin examined near ......... 23,31 Hatchets, stone, from Pueblo Viejo ruins, collectioniof=-.-<-.sseaseeeseees 183 Havasupais, cavate dwellings of ancestors OLD secoaeoc soe pia ene ee eaeeeeee 35-36 Helmets, use of, in ceremonial dances of the Opisis sos doen se sceies aoee cee eee 143 Hewitt, J. N. B., collections made by, among Iroquoian Indians .... xxxix work of, on Iroquoian languages, myths,/and'customs:..----...<.. xiii, XXiX-XXX, XXxii, XXXV-XXXVi H-figure on Pueblo pottery, reference to... 181 Hilder, Frank Frederick, biographic sketch --- Xi-xlii Xxxviii - XXXvii-xxxviii Hodge, F. W., aid given Dr Fewkes by .... 120 office work by .. XXXVii, xxxviii Holbrook, Ariz., petrified forests near.. 19 (note) pueblo ruins near, visit to......... 19, 134-136 Homolobi group of pueblo ruins, animal re- Geath\one.mcssee=ees work of... mains found at, list of speciesof 110 boneimplement irom=s-----2---eseeee 94 cloth fragments discovered at.......... 97 collections from, study of............-- Xvili Gate\of workiat-< << 22sscc-=nj--- seers eee 17 dippers from, figures of............ 65, XXXIV excayations at, by Dr Fewkes ......... xviii food bowls from, views of...........-- XXIII, XXVII, XXIX, XXXV, XLIII See also, Homolobi, ete., pottery from, below. former inhabitants of -.-----.-..---...- 24-25 jar from, figure showing -......-...-.--. 67 LOCALIONLOL Se see se mancierecieeceeesce sere 23-24 matting founGats seem cceeme ease ee 98 metates found in graves at..........- 108, 104 mug from, figure showing.............. 65 pipe clay, fragments of, found at. 111 pottery from, bird figures and symbols Sniesicnoasosceaaonn5 73, 75, 76-77, 81 human face and figures on ......... spider and sun emblem on. views of , x XXXIV, XXXV, XXXVI, XLIIT prayer sticks from, form of.......-..... 100 roof and floor construction at ........-. 110 ruin 2, bones tound'at=-----sessee aes 81, 82 314 INDEX Page Ladles from pueblo ruins in Arizona, fea- UTES Ole a= aan te aciom's pe loteeers 63-64 | figures/showineis.osec- scene eee eee 62,63 Landa, Diego de, on Mayan chronology and arithmetical methods. 252, 253, 274, 282 Langley, S. P., letter of transmittal to ..... iii Language, development of ..........- XXX-XXxi Leal, Fernando, acknowledgment UY oteoss xi Le Plongeon, A., figure cited from ‘* Queen Moo” of, reference to ........ 253, 299 Leyden stone. See Nephrite stone of Ley- den museum. Lignite ornaments from pueblo ruins, char- SACLET) Ofoeertianse came eee 87-88 figures!ShOWANgys=seee— nice eae Selene 87, 88 “Lines of life’? on Pueblo pottery, eut BHOWIDE eee ese eee aetna eee 83 reference to .....- 90, 181 Linguisties, office rant Deseret XXX-XXXIIT Little Colorado river, Arizona, pueblos on, causes of abandonment of... 20,21, 22 Little Colorado river ruins, animal re- MAINS {TOM = lee = see basketry from ........-..-- AS Blaclkstallsi@mnins. see een eee sees eee group A, description of.....-..--... 42-47 ruin A, description of..........- 43-44 ruins B, C, D, description of... .. 44 Tuins E, F, description of ....... 44 ruins G, H, I, J, description of .. 44-45 TUNG VAC W Qhaeaareae sais aoe Vili ruins H and J, view of.........- Ix TuUiny; PlaMiOf se sees eee seers 45 views of ....-- pec acese et eee ORE ruin K, description of.......-..-- 45446 ruin L, description of.......-... 46 ruin M, description of ....-.-.... 46AT the Citadel, description and fig- RING Of ee tases essere cine WiewsArom) 2-2. cecesesscee =e group B, ruin A, description of. Tuin A, plan of section a of. section of section aof .. WIG WSiOL-weeeeesceeen ee ruin B, description of... ruin ¢c, description of....... group C, ruin A, description of ..... TUINSA, plan Ofe so 22. seen ce-= =e WIEWS OL. cmeeeteee= Al, XVII-XIX ruin B, description of ........... 54-55 location! Of-e=-a-eae a= -asee cee sas 39 previous exploration of............- 39 WA HONG eSoneaBshe onGoSaTaoskamaaS VII-XIX bone implements from ..--.......---..- 93-95 bow anGdarrowsifroulers-.- sees seeee buildingymatenialsofse.--peesmcmsane es BUCO PMN Pee Soe ee ee ee = Cayate ruins near Flagstaff Chavesipassituins tre cesar teers 32-34 Chevlonriting -teee ects cect)-ma=seceetscice 30-32 Cloth) fromsasecee~ Jeeta evs eee 97 Craniaiirom eee ssc een ese see a aeaiste 110 Gisksifromieenqose seco eee eae eee ne 106 fetishesifrom ao esae os see eee oes 107-109 fOodeirOm cee cee ee teach eee ates 101 gaming canes from. 100-101 general features:Of co csccicncesceiccmcce 20-22 Homolobl PrOU pace see eee eee eee 23-30 (ETH. ANN, 22 Page Little Colorado river ruins, horn objects HOM ene css rises ese pees oe aes human crania from matting: from fs. os 2 stj-ce es soem sceece objects fromm. jose sen se semesieee eases ornaments from pigments from...........- pottery from, classification ae py color and surface finish .............- 58-61 classification of, by form 61-69 eolor of 192 decorative designs on 69-85 general features of - s Map SHOWING, 5.2 - os cede es teee ee eae prayer sticks from racial and clan kinship of inhabitants Of-dies areceees se sceen- eee snees 56 Reeds} from aici ehe cise eee eee eee 101 stone implements from............--- 102-104 stone:slabs'fromya-. 3. .224-cs cass see sci 104-106 turtle carapacesifrom............-.-.--- 95 Lizard design on bow] from Kintiel, deserip- tion and figure of............... Logistic language, development of. . Logs used in construction of moines at Pueblo Viejo ruins, mention of. 177 Loom stones from Four-mile ruin view of.. Lxv Lueas, F. A., animal remains from pueblo ruins identified by ....-....... 26,110 on features of skull of dog found at ‘ Chaves pass, Arizona .....-..... 27 Tenn). desde, pMOLKTO Lee cei smear = xl McGee, W J, administrative report by... ix-xliv ceremonies among Yaki Indians wit- messed! DY a. <0.2n5 she = 2 tani x2 ethnologie collection made by ...-. field work by ---.-.....-. xi-xii, xxvii-xxvili letter, of transmittal by.....-..:........ iii OMCeWwOrkDys-soee coe eae XV-Xvi, XXiv on Mayan arithmetical methods. -....-- 282 Mahler. , See Maler. Maines fieldwork inter. geet esee sce seems ae ix,x Maize found in pueblo ruins on Little Colo- rado river, character of......... 101 Maler, Teobert, figure of inscription at Xca- lumkin, Yucatan, reproduced from photograph by...-........- 253 Mammalian figures on pottery from pueblo ruins, description and figures, OP cass eeercee 2s /seciceees 71-72, 153-154 Masked dancer, face of, on pottery from SHUM POM esos a ene ee 115, LI figure of, on bowl from Four-mile ruin, cut showing 144 description of....... 143 Masks, use of, in ceremonies of Hopi In- Gigs eee. some rece ete 143 Mata, Aurelio, aid given Mr McGeeby ...-. xii Mattaponi Indians, discovery of remnants oftribelolscese.se-teneeo sees xii Matting from pueblo ruins, character and WEEN Cr erenccmetcner sea caccos 97 figure showing type specimen of ....... 97 Maudslay, A. P., inscriptions from Mayan monuments from works of 217, 218, 221, 22: 231, 254, 266, LXXI-LXXV,LXXVII PART 1] INDEX yl) Page Maudslay, A. P., work of, in Central American archeology, reference V0) nie SR Re ae Mace eee xliv, 203 Maya dictionary, work in transcribing -.. xxxiii Mayan calendar systems, paper on, by Cyrus MhOMEs tee = ee eee ns nee 197-305 | characterization of ..........-- xliii-xliv names of days of, table showing....-...- 278 Mayan chronology, ahau symbols in, dis- CUSSION Of eo aacpee econ == ta 265 Heures showinp: = 2) 5.--5--a202-=c-<- 267 calendar tables of ...-- descr asccotntss 304-305 eycle symbol in, discussion of and figures BNG Wanless ase ee ee 5s 234-237, 268 full count in, symbols for.........-.--.- 264 great cycles in, discussion of initial dates of, table showing..-- symbals fortes ete sa eee can katonisympolsin’..-2-s.-22-h-sase2 number tablesiofi-...-.-s:222-02-025-- 304-305 symbols for numerals in, discussion and fipmmes ofc. scasoscc8->---6 210-217, 264 time periods of, terms designating -----. 204 value of calendar terms in .......---- 204, 234 Mayan inscriptions, initial series of ....-.- 203-226 secondary series of ........-.--..----- 226-233 significance of terminal dates in..... 290-299 Mayan method of calculation, discussion | Ofc. ---- 282-290 Mayan numeral system, figures from Dres- den codex illustrating...... = 259 principles/of---.25-.2--2:--20¢ 259-261 SIPTINCANCEOLs =: o> masse 290-299 Menchero, map by, reference to...... : 19 Metate from pueblo ruin, cut showing ..... 184 Metates, burial of, with women and girls. 103-104 MMeNWOn Ob see eemanee sean sce 160 Mexican tribes, language of, study of..... xxxi- z xxxii Mexico, field work in --..--- 2.25.2... ix, xi-xii hieroglyphic records of, work on...... Xxxvi Mica plates, finding of, in puebloruins.... 111 Migrations of tribes, study of........-- Xvili-xix Mindeleff, Cosmos, Homolobi group of pueb- los identified by ...-.-..--:----- 22 | Work OL ab Mintel: 22-2. ssccc oe =--<- 125 Mindeleff, Victor, Kintiel ruin described by 125 Mishongnovi, Flute ceremony at .........- 18 Moberly, Jim, work of..............-..----- xii Moccasin-shaped jar from Pueblo Viejo.... 181 Mogollon mountains, cliff houses in, refer- (Ve 00) ee ese acosoS 20 | Molina, Audomaro, work of, on translation of Diccionario de Motul ...... xxxiii Monolithie animal at Quirigua, figure show- ANS PAE OL ee sete erties aan 211 great cycle symbol from............-..-- 266 Mooney, James, collections made by, among Cherokee Indians. .........--. xxxix field work by .-.-- work of, on Cherokee myths -.. on Cyclopedia of Native Tribes... xx) Morfi, Padre, manuscript history of Texas by, work on translation of .. xxxviii | Mortar from Pueblo Viejo ruins, description And hpureiok =o nessa eee cece nn 184, 185 Page Mortars for grinding paint, from pueblo ruins on Little Colorado river, Anding ofs-. <5. -.(ss2kc cast eeniae 104 Mortuary pottery. See Pottery. Mosaic frog from Chaves pass ruin, view Ofssssacinodogeseseaeecsone seeess XLIV Mosaic ornaments from pueblo ruins, char- CLOT. O lose pene eee eee eae eee $5-87 Moth designs, occurrence of, on Pueblo PS es ce ae Ae ie ee 81 Moth or butterfly, Pueblo symbol for ....-. 105 Motion pictures of Pueblo industries, ete., work of O. P. Phillips OW ements tone eae ee eee xili-xiv Motul, Diccionario de, work on translation Offewecnins sen ssescencesecse teens xxxili Mount Graham. See Graham, Mount. Mug. SeeCup; Dipper. | Mugs from pueblo ruins, features of........ 65-66 purest OTe cae soe sae eee 64, 65, 66 Mushroom-shaped implements of stone found in pueblo ruins, use of... 104 Myths, Cherokee, work on’......... XXXiV-KXXV comparative study of -...-..-...-- XXIX-XXX Troquoian, work on .......----- XXXV-XXXVi Puebloxworkomj--n2 222 ceo =ease sere XxXxvi Zuni, work on .. Nansemond Indians, remnants of tribe of, discovery (of. .i2 isis she ieecss xii Nantacks, arrowheads of voleanic glass APOM A jae eee e eae esi see'- 183 sacrificial cave in, amphora from, cut SHOWING esa Jascs te cose cece ese 189 bowl from, cut showing. =o 188) cecllections from.......-- 188-189 human effigy vase from ......-. 189 Natick Dictionary, progress of work on... xxxii Native Tribes, Cyclopedia of, progress of WOK ON! Ss cce- saesee- see eee XXXVII Necrology: Frank Frederick Hilder ..-... xI-xlii Needle-like implements of bone from pueblo ruins, finding of ......-. 94 Nephrite stone of Leyden museum, dis- cussion and figure of .......-- 302-303, significance of date on, discussion of... 294 New caves near Flagstaff, Ariz., description Oltsce cach sae acer ees sees 37-38 entrance to, view of lr WiewiOh 7. 2 ce—ns--5 II | New-fire ceremony, use of fetishes in ....-- 108 New Mexico, field work in .-..-..-.-...-- ix, xiii office work on collections from.......-- xvii | New York, field work in.......-.---:----- ix, xiii Nordenski6ld, G., bone implements found by, in cliff houses at Mesa Verde, reference:to }.2-c2c25-2 ese e 95 features of Mesa Verde ruins deseribed and figured) by--.-----=.-2=--- 105, 124 Norris, Hugh, work of, as Papago inter- DCtCl see os een ee ate ae eeee North Carolina, field work in -.. | Nought, in Mayan face numerals, symbol for, discussion of.. 210-211, 211-212, 214 Number tables of Mayan chronological sys- {PO 355 oo Sac asSeads none 304-305 316 INDEX [ETH. ANN, 22 Page Objects collected. See Specimens. Obsidian blades, collection of, obtained through Mr Nathan Joseph... xxxix Office work, detailed report on ...... XY-Xxxviii general scope of ......-..-- = ix Oklahoma, field work in .- view of ..-.. I Old Shumopoyvi ruins, bowl with snout from, (cut/showinge.. 7... a. cces se 114 excavations at, stoppage of .........--- 112 general features of ....-.-.---- 111-113 * pottery from, bird designs on ........ 115-118 decoration’ ofecsses.----—-- 114-119 gaming cane design on....-......-- 118 general features and form of ..-..-- 113 reptilian design on, description and Ais ure Of sa =e sama. cece see ecias 114 specimens collected at, number of ..... 18 Wiews Obs cc cence XLVIII, XLIX, L, LI Olney, D., pueblo ruins near ranch of.....- 178 Onondaga Indians, legends of, sociologic VANE BR concer oanpsccoc XXIX-XXX Ontario, field work in . ix Oraibi type of basketry, rom Tronion, arn SHOWAU Pt. eee eeeneeeemeesneea es 98, 99 Oral language, development of..........--- Xxxi Ornaments from pueblo ruins in Arizona, character of -...--...-.. 85-93, 163, 187 Ovens, Pueblo, description of ............ 128, 139 Paint mortars from pueblo ruins..... 104, 184, 185 Paints, specimens of, from pueblo ruins... 96,184 Pahos. See Prayer sticks. Palenque, inscriptions at, significance of terminal dates on ........-... 290-299 Palmer, Dr E., pottery collected by, refer- GMS UOse he so btossocdeassocssoss: 34 Pamunkey Indians, field work among ..... xii Papago Indians, field study of.............. xi quatern symbols among..........------ XV Patki clans, abandonment of pueblos on Little Colorado river by, causes OTe nae een eet ace tae 22} ChiersiO fe seen nae semana 24 former habiteatiot cs. once sce acne sce ses 23, 24 Patun people, former inhabitants of Homo- LG) Oe ek sep aritmieemse Oana SOscS 24 Pawnee Indians, field work among...... a esha y Oy, i 4 n ’ m2 hig? 2 ry ; va ew y ‘ \ ’ Fi i Ah ps) ma ye L i ul i Ili 2055 |