THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS, LAWRENCE. EXPERIMENTAL STATION. es FIFTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR, FOR THE YEAR 1895. F. H. SNOW, Director. CONTAGIOUS DISEASES OF THE CHINCH-BUG. LAWRENCE, KANSAS, Marcu, 1896. POL ; ft _ USE THE [NIVERSITY OF KANSAS, Experimental Py. ENT Lt eee hee EXPERIMENTAL STATION. HTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR, | | . FOR THE van fe, CONTAGIOUS DISEASES OF THE CHINCH-BUG. LAWRENCE, KANSAS, Marcu, 1896._ a Bs APNEA (Dee ¢ Pines Press of ; THE Kansas STATE PRINTING Con ‘J, K. Hupson, State Printer, Topeka. + | } Tn. Tes LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. LawRENCE, Kas., January 18, 1896. To His Excellency E. N. Morrill, Governor of Kansas: In accordance with the requirements of the act making ap- propriation for the maintenance of the Experimental Station at the University of Kansas for the promotion of experiments for the destruction of chinch-bugs by contagion or infection, I forward to you the following report of the results of the experi- ments for the year 1895, with an itemized statement of the money expended in the experiments. Yours respectfully, F. H. SNOW, Director of the Experimental Station. CONTENTS. PAGE. ere TOW RANE MED PATS Vr Webel as orl ult oer P uc ee cat ce barca: Deas 2 RGU OETONE tn Se ent ve ue ah tee OP Tug SOM nla hat a 5 REET MENTS IN DER, VARY LO So. ie sete MEELIS 2. vials gis’) «as Mae 7 T.. General Summary of the Year’s: Work. /).{... 2... 5.0.6.0, DL aes i i, ie Chinch-bue abd. Its: Diseases: Ons. seed niet cadence eae 13 Peni itetc ls COUN IEER vert nae ays ee koa ko RR AC cs) cree OS Ee he a 17 HV Eaboratory Experimentss. (ti) ie0 acy Nal WEIN i a a 18 May eela) Hiscperti eon gai kn eh Fi Ne eh Mo SY ae 27 Wi) eld ‘Observations of MM. A’. Barber}. i300 6 oo s Gk is Po oe 34 VII. Field Observations-of W. W. Brown in Coffey County............. 39 VIII. Considerations Regarding the Status of Sporotrichum............. 41 bX The Barrier Methods yay wee poles ete hae ook Sok Lec hea ai 44 X. Summary of Infection Distributed in 1895................... 000... 49 UATE MENT LOM TP RNDTDIRES v Ae ciel Senvae Ley cin ers ethers heck ol. eee 51 DIRECTIONS FOR OBTAINING AND APPLYING THE INFECTION ................ 53 INTRODUCTION, Durine the year 1895 both field and laboratory experiments have been conducted on a large scale for the purpose of solving doubtful points concerning the contagious diseases of the echinch-bug. Many thousands of farmers have been supplied with the Sporotrichum, or white-fungus infection. Their re- ports in reference to the success of the field operations have been of conflicting character as in former years, but the major- ity maintain that great benefit has been derived from the use of the infection. — It has been thought desirable to devote this report chiefly to a detailed description of the laboratory and field investigations conducted under the supervision of the Director by his able staff of associates and assistants. Especial acknowledgments are due to Associate Professor W. C. Stevens and Assistant M. A. Barber, of the Department of Botany of the University of Kansas, and to Mr. F. E. Marcy, for their unremitting vigi- lance in laboratory and field and for their invaluable services in the preparation of this report. Attention is here called to the fact that the Sporotrichum or white fungus evidently survived the winter of 1894—’95 in the field over an extended area of the state, and artificial infection was therefore not so essential as in years when it did not sur- vive the winter. Whether this widely-extended natural presence of Sporotrichum was the result of the general introduction of the infection throughout the state in 1894 from the laboratory of this Station, it would not be possible with certainty either to affirm or to deny. Attention is also called to the fact that the weather conditions of the past two years have been highly favorable to the undue multiplication of chinch-bugs and to their successful hiberna- tion inimmense numbers. The rainfall for the first five months of 1895 at the University was smaller than in any season during 6 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. the past 28 years, not excepting the phenomenally dry season of 1874. This extreme dryness was unfavorable to the propa- gation in the field of the diseases which destroy the chinch-bug, whether these diseases were artificially introduced or naturally present. The early wheat harvest consequent upon the spring drouth precipitated the chinch-bugs upon the corn while it was very young, so that a greater injury was inflicted by the bugs than if the plant had been of its usual size and vigor. At the same time the conditions favorable to the growth of the Sporo- trichum were not present, and the bugs were practically unhin- dered in their work of destruction. Later in the season the conditions were favorable for the development of the fungus, and the chinch-bugs were destroyed in immense numbers. Yet immense numbers remained alive, and in many cases continued to damage crops. The experience of the year 1895 corroborates the conclusion of former years that Sporotrichum cannot be depended upon to do efficient work unless the proper conditions exist for its development. The presence of these conditions insures the extended destruction of the chinch-bug, but will not secure its annihilation. The absence of these conditions often ren- ders it desirable to adopt some other measures for relief. Hence, considerable attention has been given to the use of the ‘‘barrier method’’ for keeping the bugs from gaining entrance to the corn-fields from the wheat stubble. The wise farmer will keep his fields supplied with infection, and will also be on the alert to employ mechanical means to prevent the bugs from entering the corn-fields. The two methods combined will insure a greater amount of protection than either method alone. The proposed method of inoculating the bugs in the field by spraying them with artificial cultures of the spores of Sporo- trichum has not yet proved successful, and we still depend upon the original plan of introducing the disease by scattering the dead bugs covered with the spores of the fungus. EXPERIMENTS IN 1895. I.—GENERAL SUMMARY OF THE YEAR’S WORK. 1.—THE CHINCH-BUG AND THE WEATHER. The winter and spring months of 1894 and 1895 were un- usually dry, and furnished excellent conditions for the hiberna- tion of chinch-bugs, and in consequence they have been present ‘in Kansas in large numbers during the past two years. The two successive favorable periods of hibernation resulted in a much larger number of bugs in 1895 than in 1894. We infer that the periodic appearance and disappearance of chinch-bugs _ in a locality is largely due to favorable or unfavorable con- ditions for hibernation in that locality. A wet fall, winter and early spring are pretty certain to result disastrously to the bugs. If there be a succession of such periods the chinch-bugs practically disappear. ‘There are always some survivors, how- ever, and a brief succession of dry hibernation periods results in their rapid increase. It is probable that the disappearance of bugs during wet hibernation periods is due to the ravages of _ diseases, but of this we have as yet no certain proof. 2.—SPOROTRICHUM AND THE WEATHER. The dependence of Sporotrichum upon the weather has been more evident this year than ever before. We have had a sea- son of extremes, a very unusual dry spell with clear skies dur- ing the three spring months, followed by heavy and frequent rains and cloudy skies for the three summer months. A some- what detailed statement of the weather conditions will be of service here, and since the character of 1894 probably had some influence on the number of bugs in 1895, the statement will include 1894. During the 12 months preceding January, 1895, the rainfall was 6.06 inches below the average of the preceding 26 years. From January 1, 1895, to June 1, the rainfall was 5.11 inches below the average of the same period in the preceding 27 years, (7) 8 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. and for the 17 months preceding June 1, 1895, the rainfall was 11.17 inches below the average. The deficiency of precipitation continued through January, February, March, April, and May, 1895. During the same period the relative humidity was also low: For January, 1894, the relative humidity was 3.8 above the average; February, 1.2 below; March, 6.3 below; April, 8.6 below; May, 10.0 below; June, 5.0 below; July, 13.32 be- low ; August, 15.06 below; September, 3.6 below ; October, 7.4 below ; November, 9.2 below ; December, 7.2 below; January, 1895, 7.0 below ; February, 1.1 above; March, 9.8 below; April, 11.4 below; May, 8.8 below. So that during this period the conditions were apparently unusually poor for the development of Sporotrichum, and un- usually good for the safe hibernation of the bugs and their sub- sequent increase in the spring. The meteorological conditions just enumerated also had their effects upon the crops. Winter wheat made a spare growth and ripened early, and the bugs left the wheat for the corn while the latter was comparatively small. The ground was'dry at this time, and the young corn, unable to stand even a small loss of water, succumbed to the myriads of bugs that swarmed in from the fields of small grain, At this time very little Sporotrichum could be found in the fields except in specially favorable localities, even where our best efforts were made to introduce the disease artificially. This could not be due to the fact that virulent infection was not present in the fields, for when bugs were taken to the labora- tory and put into jars where the conditions for the growth of the Sporotrichum were kept constantly good, they died and their bodies were covered with an abundant growth of Sporo- trichum. The bugs entered the corn-fields in this locality about the first of June in numbers larger than had been known to us at this season in former years. At this time Sporotrichum had made only a scanty growth in most fields, and the older bugs of the first brood were well along toward maturity. The first ma- ture bugs were seen by us 10 days later. On the last day of May 1.46 inches of rain fell, this being the first copious downpour of the season. Earlier rains had occurred, but they were incon- siderable and did not suffice to keep the ground moist long enough to start Sporotrichum extensively in the fields. Follow- Fifth Annual Report. 9 ing this date there was very little precipitation until the 9th, 10th and 11th of June. On these three dates there was almost a continuous shower amounting to 2.71 inches. Other rains followed on the 12th, 14th, 17th, and 18th, adding 2.21 inches to the rainfall. The average relative humidity for the first eight days of June was 58.8, while the succeeding eight days had an average relative humidity of 77.7. This increased | humidity and precipitation was followed by an epidemic of Sporotrichum, and fungus-covered bugs were found in abun- dance in this locality in all fields visited. The rainfall and average relative humidity for the spring and Relative Rainfall. humidity. 14S OLAS oe Ct Ueno a | I etc 1.47 56.90 JSTOR TORU hs sia Uo COMER A OES eae eR) LAVAS ck Ib te cet MAG a Le 0.74 57.06 UME erates 2 tek Teter, Mae eae BUac tan ality tN oo) 3.65 60.04 DIPS SEO OS USI cen Mr A) A UG 1S el as ata ae ull He REN 5.93 68.20 “LRA cic tie BS nee a en Ue desta GR It oo TR CUBAN Ue Le 10.06 77.70 JAAUROM TIS Fy SNR Re a eg a ee ee EA DRI NET OL CY SL NL oe ea ay 12.30 79:40 It is seen that the rainfall and humidity increased from month to month. Sporotrichum continued throughout the summer, with brief intermissions. 3.—EPIDEMIC OF SPOROTRICHUM AND EMPUSA. On the 17th of June Mr. Barber found in Coffey county chinch- bugs which had been killed by Empusa, and on the 6th of July Mr. Marcy found chinch-bugs dead with Empusa in large num- bers in corn- and millet-fields in Douglas county, and at times during the summer Empusa was even more destructive of the bugs than Sporotrichum. This was particularly the case later in the summer when the ground was kept wet by continuous heavy rains. We have never before witnessed such a wide-spread epidemic of Sporotrichum and Empusa as occurred this season, but the necessary amount of humidity came too late in many localities to start the fungus diseases extensively in time to help the young corn at that critical time when the bugs were invading it from the small-grain fields. The diseases must have been naturally epidemic when they appeared extensively later, be- cause we could see no difference between the fields inoculated artificially and those not inoculated, and bugs received from _ 10 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. ; various portions of the state very frequently developed the dis- ease under proper conditions without artificial inoculation. 4.—HEAVY RAINS AND THE CHINCH-BUG. The heavy, beating rains of the summer months enabled us to see more certainly than ever before that rains do not in them- selves destroy chinch-bugs in sufficient numbers to saye the crops. The disappearance of the bugs so often noticed after heavy rains is probably not so much due to the beating of the storm or the drowning of the bugs as to the progress of fungus diseases which may spring up naturally, as was noticed this year, when the ground is moist and the atmosphere is humid. 5.—RELATION OF SOIL, DRAINAGE, ETC., TO FUNGUS DISEASES. After Sporotrichum and Empusa became established in the fields, the best results were noticed where the grain made the densest growth and where the ground was kept shaded and moist thereby. In many such situations the ground was fairly well covered with fungus-covered bugs. But in those fields where the stand of grain was thin and the soil subject to rapid drying, relatively fewer fungus-covered bugs could be found. The growth of the Sporotrichum and Empusa was also found to depend on the character of the soil and the natural drainage of the fields. Where the soil was clayey and subject to baking on the surface, the fungus was comparatively infrequent, but where the soil was friable and loose in other parts of the same field the fungus was prevalent. Elevated portions of a field were found to be less favorable to the growth of the fungus than lower-lying portions which were moist for a longer period. In some instances, the difference was so great as to amount to com- plete failure in the less favorable situations, so far as the eco- nomic value of the disease was concerned, while in the more favorable places in the same field the destruction of the bugs was sweeping and positive. It would appear from certain experiments that the ability of the. Sporotrichum to destroy bugs depends in some measure at least upon the condition of the bugs; but the elements of the problem are so complex that it is difficult to arrive at definite conclusions. It seems certain that bugs which have about run their life course succumb more readily than the younger and Fifth Annual Report. a stronger bugs, but we have known the bugs in the larval state to die quite as rapidly as the more mature bugs. Mature bugs of the second brood in autumn and late summer show a remark- able resistance to the disease, but these yield to the disease after long confinement in the laboratory, and probably also in the field during the hibernation period if the meteorological con- ditions are favorable. 6.—ARTIFICIAL CULTURES. This year, in addition to our old method of carrying on arti- ficial infection by fungus-covered bugs, we have used artificial cultures of Sporotrichum on various media, particularly on steamed potatoes and whole corn. The cultures were shaken up in water, and the water was applied by means of spraying machines. Experiments with this and with the old method gave contradictory results in the laboratory, but in the field we were unable to see any difference between the treated and un- treated fields, either when fungus-covered bugs or artificial cul- tures were used for infection, excepting in one experiment at the very outset of the year’s work; that is to say, during the spring months, when the weather conditions were unfavorable for the growth of Sporotrichum, the artificial dissemination of spores produced no results, while later in the season, when the conditions were more favorable, we found Sporotrichum abun- dant in the untreated as well as in the treated fields. 7.—THE BARRIER METHOD. Since the experience of the past five years has taught us that there are always to be expected a varying percentage of failures in the use of Sporotrichum, we strongly urge that the farmers do not put their sole dependence upon this method, but that they also adopt the barrier method described later in this report. We have experimented the past season with this method suffi- ciently to be assured that it is a trustworthy defense at that very critical short period when the bugs are passing from the small grain into the corn-fields. With the plan of defense mapped out further on it should be the settled policy of the farmers not to let the bugs enter the corn. While the bugs are yet in the wheat and after they have scattered in the corn, and later when they have gone into winter quarters, almost our only ad 12 | Contagious Diseases of the Chineh-bug. hope is in the diseases which we know to be destructive to the bugs under proper conditions. How much relief is to accrue to the farmer from the ravages of these diseases cannot be pre- dicted beforehand, on account of the complexity of circum- stances which affect them. It is simply acting the part of wisdom, however, to see that the germs of disease are present in the field. 8.—_WATCHFULNESS NECESSARY. In using either infectious diseases or the barrier method it is important to know at an early date whether there are bugs present in the small-grain fields. As soon as the ground is thawed in the spring search should be made for the bugs under stones and debris, and at the roots of grasses and small-grain plants. If bugs are present Sporotrichum should be scattered at once. Too frequently the farmer becomes aware of the presence of chinch-bugs when he is cutting his small grain, or when the bugs are swarming into the corn-field or have already taken possession of it. When we consider the tremendous | losses annually due to the ravages of the chinch-bug, and the possibilities, with our present knowledge, of preventing the larger part of these losses with proper foresight and care, we are convinced that no labor by the farmer is so well paid as that spent in protecting his crops from these pests. 9.—UNITED EFFORT NEEDED. The farmers should organize in every community, and fight the chinch-bug in an intelligent and systematic manner. This is a common cause and should have united effort. Early in the fall the farmers about Mulvane, in Sedgwick county, organized an anti-chinch-bug association, and are ready ‘for concerted action in the spring. If their example were fol- lowed throughout the state the chances of success would be greatly increased. At the close of this report we will outline a plan of defense suited to individual and concerted action. Fifth Annual Report. 13 Il.—THE CHINCH-BUG AND ITS DISEASES. We believe it will be of service to our readers to preface the report of the work of the past year with a brief discussion of the life history of the chinch-bug and the fungus diseases which are known to destroy it. What we have to say will be in part a repetition of some things already published by us, but since the larger number of those who receive the report this year may not be acquainted with our previous reports the repetition is warranted. 1.—_LIFE HISTORY OF THE CHINCH-BUG. The appearance of the adult chinch-bug is already too well known to our readers to require a description. Adult chinch-bugs pass the winter under the shelter of leaves, sticks, stones, clods, corn-stalks, roots of grasses, etc., and are able to live through a temperature below freezing. They have been found to survive after having been frozen up solidly in ice. They begin their depredations on the roots of small grains as soon as the weather opens up in the spring. Here the female soon commences to deposit her eggs, continuing the operation over a period of 20 days, and depositing about 300 eggs in all. The egg is only about 53, of an inch long and about one-fifth as wide, and is easily overlooked by the naked eye. The egg is at first creamy white, but changes to reddish as the embryo de- velops. Theeggs hatch out in about two weeks, and the young larvee, begin to feed at the roots or upon the stalks of the small grain almost immediately. The chinch-bug arrives at maturity in from five to seven weeks, and in this interval it sheds its skin four times. After hatching the bug is of a pale reddish color, and grows darker after each successive moult. Up to the time of the third moult the bug is said to be in the larval stage ; after the third moult it is in the pupal stage, and after the fourth moult it is in the imago or mature stage. The chinch-bug does not have wings until the last or fourth moult. When the mature bug emerges from its last moult it is of a pale pink color, but in a few hours it changes to a blackish color. The same thing is observed when the larva sheds its skin for the third time and passes into the pupa state. The pink, freshly-moulted bugs have often been mistaken by farmers for diseased bugs. 14 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. t The following observations made by Mr. Barber on the color changes of chinch-bugs will be of interest here : August 19. Chinch-bugs in a millet field near the University were seen to be piling up especially about bases of tufts of millet or grass. Bugs seem to be mostly brown and black, with some pink ones. These proved to be those which had newly moulted from the larval to the pupal stage and had not yet turned black. Morning cloudy and cool, rainy later in forenoon. Pink or flesh-colored bugs, the pupe freshly moulted from larval stage, were taken to the laboratory and put into test tubes in several lots. In one tube only those which were moulting or had scarcely scarcely finished were used. Bugs put in from 12 mM. tol P. M. At 3:30 Pp. M. all lots had changed to a black color. Two lots which had been kept in a dark place'during all this time were also black. Later experiments with a bug which was put in a tube just at its moulting time shows that the change in color may occur in two hours or less. Some larve were put into a dark closet on afternoon of August 19. August 20 in the morn- ing several were found to have moulted and the pup were black as those kept in the light. So it appears that the coloration takes place in darkness as well asin daylight. One pink bug was killed with ether on afternoon of August 19, and color was found unchanged, 7. e., still pink on morning of 20th. It is evi- dent that in this field at least there was a characteristic bunch- ing and moulting stage preceding the black pupa stage. Moults, or what appeared very much like them, were found very much earlier in rolled-up leaves of millet where only young red bugs were present. Eggs were found in the same places. August 20. A bug was put into a test tube when: moulting from larval stage. 9:07 a4.m.—Pink bug, partly out of brown skin. 10:07 4. m.—Bug much darker in color. 10:50 a. m.—Bug black. September 16. A bug in the pupal stage, just moulting to the adult stage, at 11 A.M. was put intoavial. At 12:55 p.w., the black spots on the wings were as distinct as in old adults, and the body was becoming brownish. At 2 p.m. the body was deeper brown. At 8 A.M. of the following day the bug had the characteristic of the old adults. Fifth Annual Report. 15 Before the bugs of the first brood are all mature, and while many of them are even in the larval state, they leave the fields of small grain and swarm over into the fields of young corn. The mature bugs seldom fly at this time, and this makes it possible to easily prevent the bugs from entering the fields by the barrier method described later in the report. When the bugs are casting their skins they have the habit of gather- ing together in piles under clods and fallen corn-stalks, etc., and since they cast their skins at four different periods of their life and the eggs are laid through a period of 20 days, the bugs may be found of all ages in these piles. The bugs in the piles have often been mistaken for diseased bugs, and we wish to caution our readers against such a mistake. The shade and moisture which the bugs seek at this time no doubt aid in softening the skins so that they may be more easily broken and cast off, and very likely the trampling of the bugs over each other in great numbers also assists in the process of moulting. The bugs emerge from their skins through a slit down the back just behind the head, and when the bug has emerged, the empty skin is a complete one.. The slit through which the bug has crawled often closes up entirely, and then the skins are easily mistaken for dead bugs. Their character may readily be determined, however, for if they be taken in the hand and gently breathed upon they are blown away because of their ex- treme lightness. The farmers are often deceived by another habit of the bugs: When the bugs first enter the corn they mass upon the first few rows. At this time their great number is most striking, but in a few days they may scatter widely over the fields, and even though they are not being destroyed by disease their numbers may appear to be essentially reduced. We must repeat what we have said in a previous report, that the only certain evidence to the farmer that the bugs are being destroyed in his fields by Sporotrichum is the presence of the dead bugs covered with the dense white spore-bearing growth . of the fungus. The reports of farmers to the Station will be greatly enhanced in value if the above sources of error are care- fully borne in mind. . i 16%: Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. 2.—SPOROTRICHUM AND EMPUSA. The causes of the known diseases of the chinch-bug are minute plants known as Sporotrichum and Empusa, or more popularly as the white and gray fungus or muscardine, respec- tively. They consist essentially of minute thread-like roots which penetrate the body of the bug and feed upon it, and the very minute branches produced on the outside of the bug and bearing small bodies in great abundance called spores. These spores germinate and produce new plants, thus serving the same purpose as the seeds of the higher plants. The spores are borne in minute bunches on the external branches somewhat like bunches of grapes. A single spore is only about ;>45> of an inch in diameter, and there are count- less numbers of these borne over the body of a single bug. Empusa, or the gray fungus, does not bear its spores in bunches, but singly, on comparatively large branches. These parasitic plants are called fungi, (singular, fungus,) and are not very distantly related to the rust of wheat and the mildew of potatoes, grapes, etc. It is seen that while some species of parasitic plants, such as wheat rust, potato mildew, etc., injure the farmer by destroying his crops, other species, such as Sporotrichum and Empusa, are helpful in that they destroy insects which eat up his crops. These low forms of plants flourish best in a humid atmosphere and in moist situations. They are even more sensitive to vari- ations in the weather than higher plants, because of their very diminutive size. With these considerations in mind it becomes evident that there can be no hope for success with Sporotrichum while the weather continues dry and hot, while on the other hand the very diminutive size of the spores and the vast numbers that are produced on a single bug would lead one to expect their very rapid and extensive dissemination when once present in a locality, and a general destruction of bugs when the conditions are favorable is therefore not surprising. During the past season we have found Empusa at times quite as destructive of chinch-bugs as Sporotrichum, indeed, later in the summer when the weather became excessively wet and cloudy, Empusa prevailed in some localities to the exclusion of Sporotrichum ; but Empusa cannot be so much depended on oe sce Fifth Annual Report. A as Sporotrichum, and while it naturally does a great service at times, we have not found it feasible to attempt its artificial dissemination. Sporotrichum seems to flourish through a wider range of meteorological conditions than Empusa, and would be the more likely to appear as a natural epidemic. III,—ARTIFICIAL CULTURES. We have attempted at various times since 1889 the culture of Sporotrichum on other media than the chinch-bug, such as po- tatoes, corn, beef-broth, etc., in the hope of producing the fungus in greater quantities, and of disseminating the infection more rapidly than is possible by means of fungus-covered bugs. These experiments had been confined to the laboratory, and had not given promising results. We determined at the beginning of the past season’s work to carry on experiments of this kind on a large scale in the open field, and at the same time to con- duct parallel experiments in the laboratory. Pint Mason fruit- jars were used in making the artificial cultures. A three-fourths inch hole was cut in the metal cover, and a zinc tube of the diameter of the hole was inserted into this and soldered flush with the upper surface. This is essentially as figured and de- scribed by Forbes, in Bulletin No. 58, issued March, 1895, the only difference being that we have the tube project into the jar instead of above it for convenience in sterilizing large numbers of jars at one time. Whole corn or sliced raw potatoes were put into these jars, the tubes were tightly plugged with baked cotton, and the jars were placed in a large steamer and steamed for two hours in the morning and two hours in the evening for three successive days. Then, with the usual precautions, the cotton plugs were withdrawn, and spores from pure plate cultures were inserted through the tube in cover and dusted over the corn or potato by means of a piece of platinum foil melted into the end of a glass rod. This was sterilized in the flame of a Bunsen burner at frequent intervals. In this manner we were able to prepare large quantities of material for our field experi- ments. To distribute the infection in the fields water was shaken up with the cultures in the jars. The water ina single jar holding —2 18 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. the spores in suspension was poured into 10 gallons of water and distributed over the fields by means of a spraying apparatus. It was found that by this dilution one or more spores could be found in a single drop of the water. The experiment was varied by sprouting spores over night in a sugar solution before spray- ing. At the same time experiments of a like nature were car- ried on in the laboratory. For this purpose flower-pots half filled with friable garden soil and closed at the top with cotton batting were sterilized in a hot-air oven. The soil was then wet with boiled water, then the bugs were put into the pots, then the infection, and finally the sterilized cotton was tied over the mouth of the jar. Bugs from one locality only in most instances were used in a single set of experiments. An account of the laboratory experiments will be briefly stated. IV.—LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS. Kxperiment 1. March 19 eight pots were started, haying been prepared as stated above. (a) Two pots were watered with boiled water, but left unin- oculated, to serve as checks. (b) Two pots were infected with fungus-covered bugs. (c) Two pots were sprayed with culture from potato. (d) Two pots were sprayed with culture from potato after the spores had been sprouted in sugar solution. The bugs slowly died of Sporotrichum in all the pots, the checks showing no material difference. | Hxperiment 2. April 22 bugs that had been received from various parts of the state were put into a large box until they had intermingled and then were distributed as equally as pos- sible among 12 pots. (a) Three were left uninoculated as checks. (b) Three were inoculated with fungus-covered bugs. (c) Three, were sprayed with spores of artificial culture on turnip. (d) Three were sprayed with sprouted spores from turnip culture. Bugs in all the pots slowly died of Sporotrichum, the checks showing no essential difference. Es ‘ 1. a Fifth Annual Report. 19 Experiment 3. April 24 nine pots were started. (a) Three checks. (b) Three sprayed with artificial culture. (c) Three treated with a parasitic fungus found on other in- sects. The bugs died slowly in a and ¢ but about twice as rapidly in b. Experiment 4. May 2, mixed bugs from various sources were put into nine pots. (a) Three checks. (b) Three sprayed with artificial culture of Sporotrichum. (c) Three inoculated with Sporotrichum on chinch-bugs. The bugs remained alive in a, but died in b and ¢ of Sporo- trichum. The bugs were left in a until all died, but none de- veloped Sporotrichum. Experiment 5. May 9, started nine pots. (my Pbiree checks. (6) Three sprayed with artificial culture. (c) Three with Sporotrichum on chinch-bugs. The bugs died in all the pots, and developed Sporotrichum. Experiment 6. May 10, started nine pots. (a) Three checks. (b) Three sprayed with artificial culture. (c) Three sprayed with Sporotrichum on chinch-bugs. The pots were opened May 30, 20 days after inoculation. The bugs were dead in all the pots. In pots ano Sporotrichum was present; in pots ) and ¢ Sporotrichum was abundant. Experiment 7. May 16, started six pots. (a) Three checks. (b) Three sprayed with artificial culture. Sporotrichum developed in both a and b. Experiment 8. May 16, started four pots with bugs from Ax- tell, Kas. (a) Two checks. (b) Two sprayed with artificial cultures of Sporotrichum. Sporotrichum developed in a and b alike. Experiment 9. May 21, started four pots. (a) Two checks. (b) Two sprayed with artificial cultures of Sporotrichum. Sporotrichum developed in a and b alike. 20 Contagious Diseases of the Chanch-bug. Experiment 10.. May 22, started four pots. (a) Two checks. (b) Two sprayed with artificial cultures of Sporotrichum. Sporotrichum developed alike in a and b. Experiment 11. June 7, started nine pots with bugs from Lib- erty, Kas. (a) Three checks. (b) Three sprayed with sprouted spores of artificial culture of Sporotrichum. i (c) Three inoculated with Sporotrichum on chinch-bugs. An abundance of Sporotrichum developed in b and c¢, but a was entirely free from it. Experiment 12. June 8, started six pots. (a) Two checks. (b) Two with Sporotrichum on bugs. (c) Two sprayed with artificial cultures of Sporotrichum. Bugs died in all the pots, covered with Sporotrichum. One of the check-pots showed no fungus for about 10 days, but finally this also developed Sporotrichum. Experiment 13. June 10, started nine pots with bugs from Independence, Kas. (a) Three checks. (b) Three with Sporotrichum on bugs. (c) Three sprayed with artificial cultures of Sporotrichum. Bugs died and were covered with Sporotrichum in all pots alike. Experiment 14. June 12, started six pots with bugs from Girard, Kas. (a) Two checks. (b) Two sprayed with sprouted artificial culture of Sporo- trichum. (c) Two with Sporotrichum on bugs. Sporotrichum developed in all pots alike. Experiment 15. June 14, started nine pots. (a) Three checks. (b) Three with Sporotrichum-coyered bugs. (c) Three sprayed with artificial culture of Sporotrichum. Sporotrichum developed in all pots alike. Experiment 16. June 17, started six pots. (a) Two checks. . a yee ee Fifth Annual Report. 21 (b) Two sprayed with artificial cultures. (c) Two with Sporotrichum on bugs. Sporotrichum developed in all pots alike. Experiment 17. June 19, started nine pots with bugs from Glasco, Kas. (a) Three checks. (b) Three sprayed with artificial culture. (c) Three with Sporotrichum on bugs. Sporotrichum developed in all pots alike. Experiment 18. June 22, started six pots. (a) Two checks. (b) Two with sprouted artificial cultures. (c) Two with Sporotrichum on bugs. Sporotrichum developed in all pots alike. Experiment 19. June 28, started nine pots. (a) Three checks. (b) Three with dry spores from artificial cultures. (c) Three with Sporotrichum on bugs. Sporotrichum developed in all pots alike. Experiment 20. July 1, started six pots. (a) Two checks. (6) Two with Sporotrichum on bugs. (c) Two sprayed with artificial culture. Sporotrichum developed in all pots alike. Experiment 21. July 5, started nine pots. (a) Three checks. (b) Three with Sporotrichum on bugs. (c) Three dusted with dry spores from artificial cultures. Sporotrichum appeared in all pots alike. Experiment 22. July 9, started six pots. (a) Two checks. (6) Two with Sporotrichum on bugs. (c) Sprayed with artificial cultures on corn. Most of the bugs were pupe. Sporotrichum developed in all pots alike. Experiment 23. July 20, started nine pots. (a) Three checks. (b) Three sprayed with artificial cultures. (c) Three with Sporotrichum on bugs. 22 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. Two of the a pots showed a decided growth of Sporotrichum, while one of a and all of b and ¢ did not show any fungus. Experiment 24. September 6, experiment to determine the effect of temperature on infectious diseases of chinch-bugs. Three pots with bugs sent in by express had Sporotrichum added, and were put into a refrigerator. Three pots, similarly arranged, were put into a Wardian case at room temperature. Experiment started 12 to 12:15 p.m. The temperature was taken with a Centigrade thermometer. September 7—11:15 a. m.: Wardian case, 24.5°; refrigerator, 13°. September 7— 2:45 p.m.: Wardian case, 25°; refrigerator, 11°. September 7—5:00 p.m.: Wardian case, 24.5°; refrigerator, 10.75”. September 8—10:00 a. m.: Wardian case, 24.5°; refrigerator, 11.5”. September 9—7:30 a. m.: Wardian case, 23.5°; refrigerator, 12°. September 9—5:25 p. m.: Wardian case, 22°; refrigerator, 11.75°. September 10—7:35 a. m.: Wardian case, 26°; refrigerator, 12°. Bene 10—7:35 a.M.: One pot of each lot was opened; no disease was noted. September 12—4:25 p.m.: Very hot afternoon; Wardian case, 31°; refrigera- tor, 13° to 14°, probably 14°. September 13—9:15 a.m.: Wardian case, 28.5°; refrigerator, 16°. September 14—10:15 a.m.: Wardian case, 29°; refrigerator, 14°. September 16— about 8:30 a.m.: Refrigerator, 16.5°. (Supply of ice small.) Pots taken out September 23; few bugs alive. Not much trace of disease, and-no noticeable difference between bugs kept in refrigerator and those in Wardian case pots. Experiment 25. September 30. Bugs taken from millet and corn were put into five pots, three containing wet earth, and two dry. All were infected with Sporotrichum, the experiment being merely to determine the relative resistance to diseases of bugs taken at this period. Dirt was not sterilized. Pots were put into a close dark place —a refrigerator without ice. October 16— Pot A, wet: Five Sporotrichum bugs seen with perhaps 40 to 50 still living and apparently healthy bugs. Interior of pot moist, and more water, not distilled or sterilized, was added. October 16— Pot B, dry: Two or three Sporotrichum bugs seen. Growth on these not so large as on those in wet pot. May have been a few more Sporotrichum-covered bugs in the pot, but number proportionately very small. Fifty to 100 live bugs roughly estimated. Pot was left dry. October 16—Pot C, wet: Three, very probably Sporotrichum, bugs seen. If others were present they were very inconspicu- Fifth Annual Report. 23 ous. Small clods, etc., were overturned in the search for Sporotrichum. Pot was freshly watered. About 50 apparently healthy bugs, roughly estimated. October 16 —Pot D, wet: Five apparently Sporotrichum bugs seen. Sixty living, roughly counted. Pot freshly wetted as in A and C, but much more liberally. October 16—Pot E, dry: Proportion of Sporotrichum-covered bugs to living about the same as in other pots, possibly one or two more with Sporotrichum, but lesser growth in dry pots makes rough estimate less accurate. Pot not watered. Sporo- trichum bugs were not removed from the pots. Pots examined again on October 31. Sporotrichum bugs left in pots as before on October 16. Pot A, wet: Still moist. Perhaps 12 bugs dead with charac- teristic Sporotrichum color, one at least dead with no mouldy covering. Numbers still living and active, but owing to clods, etc., in dirt, not easy to count. As many alive as dead, or more apparently. Pot watered again with distilled water. Pot B, dry: Some alive but more dead. Few of the dead ones shew the characteristic mould. Pot left dry Pot C, wet: Earth not very moist, cracked in pot. Hardly 10 white bugs seen. Many, far outnumbering dead, alive and active, apparently in healthier condition than in dry pot B. Pot rewatered. , October 31—Pot D, wet: Conditions about the same as in C, except pure Sporotrichum bugs; hardly more than on Oc- tober 15. Earth still moist, but cracked somewhat; few live bugs and no Sporotrichum found in cracks below surface of soil. Pot rewatered more liberally than were others. Pot E, dry: Conditions resemble those in other dry pot, B. Many bugs alive, and lively enough when sun strikes them. Many dead without characteristic Sporotrichum growth. One or two with Sporotrichum-like covering. Pot left dry. November 16— Pot A, wet: Six bugs or so alive. About 40 with the white growth. Pot rather dry, freshly moistened. November 16— Pot B, dry: Bugs all dead apparently, but none with white growth on surface of body. (One exception?) Pot left dry. ' November 16—Pot C, wet: At least 12 living bugs, appar- 24 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. ently healthy. Hardly as many with white growth. Earth in pot moister than in A. Pot freshly moistened. November 16— Pot D, wet: Number of living bugs appar- ently greater than in C, and mould-covered bugs fewer if dif- ferent. Pot freshly moistened. November 16— Pot E, dry: Bugs apparently all dead; some with mould covering. December 5—Pot D, wet: No live bugs seen. Contents of pot dry. Several dead bugs with no external growth. Pot not moistened further. December 5—Pot A: No live bugs seen. Pot dry. Major- ity with white growth. Pot not watered again. December 5—Pot C: Same as A. Some live bugs found in wet pots as late as November 22. It will be noticed that the checks remained pure in experi- ments 4, 6, and 11, the bugs dying in the inoculated pots of Sporotrichum, while in all the other experiments the checks showed as good growth of Sporotrichum as the inoculated pots. Experiment 23 showed the anomalous result that two of the three checks developed Sporotrichum, while inoculated pots were free from it. We may conclude from these experiments that Sporotrichum was pretty generally prevalent throughout the state, and that probably in many localities there was no necessity for its arti- ficial distribution in 1895. How much this general presence of Sporotrichum was due to its distribution by the Station in former years it would be impossible to say. Experiment 26. Open-box experiment in the laboratory. This experiment was made under different conditions from the fore- going, and is not given in the series in the order of its date. Wooden boxes were used instead of flower-pots. The boxes were left uncovered, so as to give conditions more nearly like those in the open field. The bugs were kept from escaping from boxes by means of a heavy chalk-line drawn inside the box on the sides. Box 2 was very shallow, and the bugs were kept in it by means of a tar-line on the soil of the outer edge. The bugs for the boxes were taken from a field which had been artificially infected in 1894 and 1895. We wanted among other a Fifth Annual Report. 25 things to learn, if possible, whether the field was thoroughly inoculated. In answer to this question we found that the lib- eral addition of Sporotrichum by different methods to the bugs thus isolated in the boxes did not apparently increase their mortality. Sporotrichum was very destructive, as well as Em- pusa, which was not added. by us, but the bugs apparently did not die of Sporotrichum faster in the boxes inoculated than was the case in the open field. The inference is reasonable that the field was thoroughly in- oculated and would not have profited by further treatment. Empusa, however, flourished as well in the boxes as in the most favorable situations in the open field, and this may ac- count for the fact that the bugs were nearly all dead in the boxes at the expiration of 20 days, while in the field they were still numerous. June 15. Open box No. 1 was started. The bottom of the box was covered with garden soil to a depth of from one to three inches, and the sides, which were eight inches high, were thoroughly chalked down to the soil. Four pots of young field corn were arranged along the middle of the box, and after the soil had been well dampened, the bugs, taken directly from a field, were introduced. There was almost a pint of them, mostly pupe. A few fungus-covered bugs were scattered near and on the pots. The box was placed near a west window so as to get three to four hours’ sunlight every day. This was done with the intention of making the conditions in the box as nearly as possible like those of an ordinary field. June 16. Bugs thick on stalks of corn, causing it to wilt. Corn renewed ; very few bugs escaping over the chalk. June 17. Quite a number of dead bugs (white) were noticed. They were scattered in patches on the surface of the soil. This appearance of Sporotrichum so soon after the starting of the box was doubtless due to the presence of the disease in the field from which the bugs for stocking the box had been taken — this field having been infected last year and also this spring. June 18. Slight increase in number of dead bugs. Corn repotted. June 19. No perceptible increase of dead bugs. Results in the box are much like those in the corn-field from which the \ 26 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. bugs were taken, there having been many dead bugs there on the 17th, but few since. June 20. Sprayed the bugs with sprouted spore-solution. June 21. Bugs seem to be dying slowly, and white ones are gradually getting thicker on the surface of the soil. June 22. Sprayed with sprouted spores. Open box No. 2 started. This might more properly be called a table, as the sides were only an inch high—just enough to hold in the dirt. This box was about 10 feet long by 3 feet wide, and was divided into three sections. The bugs, taken as before from the corn- field, were kept in the box and prevented from crossing the lines | dividing the three sections by means of a line of tar. This line was about one inch wide, and was renewed daily. Two pots of corn were placed in each section. Section A was sprayed with ordinary artificial culture. Section B was infected with dis- eased bugs. Section C was sprayed with sprouted spores. This box was also placed so as to be in the sunlight a few hours each afternoon. June 23. Nothing new in box 1. No results in box 2. June 24. Bugs in box 1 had for several days been gathering in large numbers in the corners of the box, as well as on the corn. Many of them were moulting, and newly-winged bugs could be seen. A few bugs were dying every day. Box 2, no results. Fresh corn putin. Tar-line renewed. June 25. Box 1. The soil was thickly speckled with white bugs, but they were not perceptibly more numerous than the day before. Box 2. Noresults yet. The bugs in box 1 have almost all reached the adult stage. / June 26. No increase of Sporotrichum in box 1, but large numbers of bugs covered with Empusa aphidis. Ground coy- ered in one corner of box, and many bugs stuck on the pots. Very sudden and remarkable growth. Box 2 had a few Sporo- trichum bugs in each section. June 27. A slight increase of Empusa in box 1; no change in Sporotrichum. Box 2 showed no increase of Sporotrichum. Some of the winged bugs escaped over the tar. One Empusa bug was found on a pot in C in the morning, and several more in the afternoon. No Empusa had yet been noticed in the closed boxes. It developed perceptibly in box 1 during the day. i Fifth Annual Report. OT June 28. Box 1 had a new growth of Empusa; dead bugs thick on the ground in places, and sticking to the sides of flower-pots. . The Sporotrichum had not perceptibly increased. The old growth of Empusa had largely disappeared, having dried up. Box 2. Slight increase of Empusa and Sporo- trichum. Not over a dozen dead bugs in each section. Em- pusa was found for the first time in the closed infection boxes. One box had an abundant growth. The box was not unusu- ally damp, and no reason for the appearance of Empusa there rather than elsewhere could be given. Open box No. 1 was rather dry when Empusa first appeared, but it was thoroughly dampened the same day and the growth of the fungus was not at all retarded. June 29. Box 1. No very noticeable change in amount of either fungus. Box 2. Slight increase of Sporotrichum. Per- haps a little more in B than elsewhere. This section was largely shaded by a division wall between the windows. June 50. Slight increase in both boxes. July 1. Same as yesterday. July 2. No change except that Empusa does not seem to in- crease in box 1. July 5. Bugs almost all dead in box 1. In box 2. There seems to be no difference in the different divisions: Empusa and Sporotrichum are the same in both. V.—FIELD EXPERIMENTS. Our observations and experiments in the field were not at variance with those in the laboratory. Whenever conditions were favorable we found Sporotrichum and often Empusa. The infection seemed to be generally distributed and only awaited favorable meteorological conditions for its manifesta- tion. All fields did not give the same results because of different soils, drainage, etc. But the results were alike in that we were unable to get satisfactory evidence that the artificial distribu- tion of the infection was of much assistance. We conclude from this that Sporotrichum survived in Kansas through the winter of 1894—’95, and was present over large areas in sufficient quan- 28 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. tities to destroy all bugs susceptible to the infection as soon as the weather became favorable for the growth of the fungus. We will here detail two of the field experiments which will be fairly representative of all. The first experiment, which is also the first of the season, shows an exception to the rule above stated in that the artificial infection appeared to give favorable results at first. Later, however, results could not be determined with certainty. 1.— FIELD EXPERIMENT No. 1. On March 10 chinch-bugs were found hibernating in great numbers under stones on Mr. Marshall’s farm near Willow Springs. Sporotrichum had been distributed on this farm in 1894. On March 23 half a pint of live bugs were gathered from under the stones on this farm, and at the same time spores of Sporotrichum from artificial cultures on squash and turnip were dusted under the stones dry, and also sprayed in water. On March 30 the bugs were reported to be dying under the stones where the infection had been put. On April 2 Mr. Marcy visited the farm, and found from five to 10 bugs dead with Sporotrichum under each stone where the in- fection had been put, but he was unable to find any Sporo- trichum where the infection had not been distributed. On April 14 Mr. Marcy again visited this farm, and the bugs were very much diminished. Sporotrichum had increased, but not in sufficient amount to account for the diminution of bugs observed, and it is concluded that the bugs had scattered. On June 25 Mr. Marcy again visited this field. Before this date Mr. Marshall had infected the field with Sporotrichum- covered bugs, and the wheat had been cut and the bugs had passed to adjoining timothy and corn fields. On the borders of the wheat-field, where the ground was shaded by a rank growth of weeds, bugs dead and covered with Sporotrichum were found in great abundance; but still the bugs were quite numerous in the timothy and corn fields and were doing con- siderable damage. On another farm worked by Mr. Marshall, about three-fourths of a mile distant, artificial cultures of Sporotrichum had been applied with a sprayer, and Sporotrichum was found abundant ; however, four or five acres of corn had been destroyed at this date. Le . je J Fifth Annual Report. 29 Farms in the neighborhood where infection had not been used were in essentially the same condition. Sporotrichum was plentiful, but the corn was considerably damaged. 2.—FIELD EXPERIMENT No. 2. Near the University campus was a field of wheat, which we will call A, with a corn-field adjoining it on the south, which we will call B. No other grain-fields were adjacent to it. On the rocky hillsides bordering the wheat-field on the north and east chinch-bugs were found early in the spring hibernating under the loose surface stones. Early in April the bugs were. found in large numbers all over the wheat-field. Sporotrichum was distributed in the wheat-field, and later in the corn-field, by various methods, as is shown by the following notes : April 11. Sprayed with the squash culture of Sporotrichum on the north side of field A. The bugs were thick and the ground was dry. April 13. Sprayed the same field A, more thoroughly than on the llth. Sprayed all around it and through the middle. Sprayed with the sprouted Sporotrichum from artificial culture in the field B, around it, and some distance in toward the cen- ter, on the north side. Bugs were as thick as in A; more than a dozen could be found around a single blade of wheat. April 16. Could find no Sporotrichum bugs either in A or B. April 20. No Sporotrichum bugs; live ones were very thick on the lower sides of (south side) A and B. April 25. No Sporotrichum bugs found. April 27. Sprayed with sprouted Sporotrichum from arti- ficial cultures on the south side of field B. Could not find any Sporotrichum bugs. May 1. No Sporotrichum could be found; soil very dry. May 2. Rain fell late in the afternoon. May 4. Bugs to all appearances were healthy. Could find no Sporotrichum. Sprayed field A. Scattered Sporotrichum bugs in B; had about one gallon of earth from infection-box containing bugs covered with Sporotrichum, and this was scat- tered on the south side of the field. The ground was moist and in good condition. It was as we like to have it in our infec- tion-boxes. 30 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. May 5. Another rain. May 6. No Sporotrichum bugs found ; soil moist. May 9. Found a few Sporotrichum bugs in A and B, but it was only after diligent search. The ground was quite dry. It dried up fast, owing to the excessive heat which we had had for a few days. May.11. More Sporotrichum bugs in the field. May 13. Field very dry. May 15. On the night of the 14th a half inch of rain fell. May 16. Slight showers of rain last night; misty to-day. Vast numbers of little red bugs (larvee) found in field. Sporo- trichum a little more abundant, but not at all plentiful. Sprayed in a small patch in A, and scattered Sporotrichum bugs in a small patch in B. Bugs were taken from the field and put into a flower-pot, which was kept in good condition for the growth of Sporotrichum. May 20. Visited both fields after the rain of the 19th and the morning rain of the 20th. Found only a few Sporotrichum bugs. The ground was moist and warm. Bugs taken from field and transferred to pot in the laboratory on May 16 are dying of Sporotrichum. May 23. Sprayed field A in a little ravine where the wheat was large and the bugs thick. Used two jars of the artificial culture ; also scattered Sporotrichum bugs in field B. Only a few Sporotrichum bugs could be found. Temperature cool. In the patches that were infected May 16 can see no results. May 25. Sprayed in asmall plot in field A with spouted Sporotrichum from artificial cultures. Only a very few Sporo- trichum bugs could be found. Bugs in pot taken from field May 16 dead and covered with Sporotrichum. May 28. ‘To-day and yesterday a drying hot wind prevailed. (Temperature 90°; wind from the south.) May 29. Very hot and dry. There seems to be no evidence that Sporotrichum is spreading. May 30. Heavy rain last night, and to-day it is misting. June 1. A few Sporotrichum bugs could be found. June 5. A large majority of the old bugs can be found coy- ered with Sporotrichum in the field B, in the southwest part, where the soil is heavy and the wheat large. A few of the little larvee could be found covered over with the fungus. Fifth Annual Report. 31 Bugs moving into the corn in great numbers. The corn-field was now marked off into four plots. Plot 1 was not inocu- lated artificially, and served as a check. Plot 2 was sprayed with Sporotrichum spores from artificial cultures. Plot 3 was infected by scattering bugs covered with Sporotrichum from the infection-boxes. Plot 4 was sprayed with sprouted spores of Sporotrichum from artificial cultures. At this date the wheat had been cut, and the bugs had advanced in the corn all the way from 36 rows in plot 1 to about 40 rows in plot 4. Infec- tion was now distributed as above indicated in rows 4, 6, 15 and 20 in all the plots. . June 8. Sprayed in No. 2 rows 8, 16,24. Sprayed sprouted spores in No. 4 in rows 8, 16, 24. Scattered Sporotrichum bugs in rows 16 and 24 in No. 3. Bugs are advancing. Soil quite dry. June 9. At 3 o’clock began to rain. June 10. Rained all night. About three inches of rain fell. June 11. Rain did not seem to diminish the bugs. Could find a little Sporotrichum in all parts of the field. June 12. Field very moist; muddy in places. Bugs on the stalks very thick; could find Sporotrichum around all stalks in plots 1, 2, 3, and 4, as far as the bugs had advanced. A few full-fledged bugs found. Sprayed in rows 30, 32, 34, and 36, in plot2. Scattered Sporotrichum in No. 3, in rows 25 and 30. Sprayed sprouted spores in No. 4, in rows 30, 52, 54, and 36. June 13. A light shower last night; ground very moist and warm. Sporotrichum quite abundant, but the bugs are still doing great damage. More of the mature bugs noticed. Bugs moulting. June 14. Sporotrichum abundant. Moist and warm. June 15. Rainedlast night. Very warm. bugs still moult- ing, but not in large bunches as has been noticed in other fields. June 17. Showers yesterday. Warm. Many Sporotrichum bugs, but ae many still alive; the ground around each stalk in rows 2, 3,4, etc., is thickly spotted with Sporotrichum bugs. June 18. Very ee rain last night, washed most of the Sporotrichum bugs away; could only find them around the roots of the corn. At first sight, one would think that the live bugs had been washed away by the rains, but a closer examina- tion showed that they were hanging to the leaves of the corn, 32 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. weeds, etc. After diligent search, only a few bugs could be found covered up in the mud. ! June 19. Bugs in corn, and very active. Only a few Sporo- trichum bugs could be found. These were most abundant in plot 4 where the weeds were large and made the soil moist and shady. Bugs still moulting. June 20. Only alittle more Sporotrichum than yesterday ; Bugs beginning to scatter. June 21. Bugs moulting and scattering. Very hot. June 22. Could see no change from yesterday. Very hot. June 24. Bugs still scattering all through the field. June 26. A few bugs flying, but not many. Hot. June 28. Cooler. June 29. Rained all day. June 30. Misty and rainy. July 1. Large number of Sporotrichum bugs could be found in the field. Ground moist but not muddy. Bugs have scat- tered all over the fleld. July 8. Sporotrichum very abundant. July 5. Heavy rain on the 4th. July 8. Plenty of Sporotrichum and some Empusa could be found in all parts of the field, especially where it was weedy. July 24. Bugs still in the corn, some little red larve. Sporotrichum quite abundant. After the wheat had been cut in fields A and B, the stubble was turned under and millet was sown in the south half of A and corn was planted in the north half. Corn was also planted in B. After these had made a fair growth the bugs invaded them from field C. On the Ist of August the bugs, including many red larve, were plentiful ,in these fields. Sporotrichum was also abundant. August 5. With a large sprayer, 45 gallons of Sporotrichum spores in water, from artificial cultures, were sprayed over the young corn of field A. August 19. Apparently the beginning of an Empusa epi- demic in millet of field A. August 17 and 18 were warm, sunny days, but some very wet weather had preceded. Some Empusa bugs were found in this field August 16. Some red bugs were placed in a test tube on the afternoon of August 19. August 20, one bug found covered with Empusa. No signs of Fifth Annual Report. 33 Empusa noticed when bugs were put in, but this bug on August 20 had a vigorous growth, and spores were being abjected. August 22. To-day found the first full-fledged bugs of the second brood. Empusa is spreading quite rapidly. There is - not as much Sporotrichum as in the beginning of the month. August 23. Several pale-winged bugs just moulted seen in millet, but proportionally very few, perhaps one to several thousands. August 24. Wet morning after heavy rain previous evening. Many Empusa bugs. Moulting still going on. Bugs in millet more advanced in age than those in corn. August 28. Empusa spreading, and it is diminishing the bugs in millet quite rapidly. September 5. Empusa doing good work. September 9. Empusa abundant in corn-field A. Could find but two Sporotrichum bugs in any of the fields. September 138. About 8.45 a.m. Much Empusa in millet- field. Comparatively littleincorn. Groundvery moist. Rained hard on the 8th; no rain since to amount to anything. September 14. Bugs comparatively few in millet-field, not so much fresh Empusa as on other mornings recently. Number of bugs in corn-field not much diminished. Great majority of corn-field bugs are black, but some are moulting for the last time. Bugs in corn mostly in axils of leaves. Two Sporo- trichum bugs were found in millet. Millet is drying up in places but still green in lower part of field. Corn green. Warm morning. The 15th was hot and dry. September 16. Bugs very few in millet, and great majority there winged. Empusa comparatively abundant and much of it fresh-looking. In corn bugs very much fewer than earlier in the season; some stalks with very many on them, but large number of stalks which had numerous red bugs have very few now. Little disease of any kind in corn. Sporotrichum in millet more abundant than during any recent time past. Light shower on morning of 16th, but 15th and practically all of 16th hot with clear skies. Some bugs flying. September 17. Morning warm, clear, with southwest wind. In millet no more fresh Empusa than on morning of 16th. Millet getting old, and many bugs in upper part of stalks. In corn bugs moulting for last time. More abundant on certain —3 34 sited: Diseases of the Chinch-bug. fallen stalks. Ltete disease except in a few low places where ground was still moist; there Empusa was found. September 23. Urea cool, no wind; first frost of season. Slight rain on 22d, which was first rain for several days. Bugs in corn seem to continue to decrease, mostly winged: One or two Empusa bugs seen; but very little disease. Bugs still moulting. In the millet-field, bugs hardly found except in one spot, where they were still abundant, mostly winged. Empusa plentiful there, but most of it old-looking. September 27. Rain on the evening of the 18th. Bugs seemed to be fewer than ever, all or practically all winged. Very little disease seen, no fresh Empusa. Nights have been cool, and the ground is moist; corn being cut up. The few bugs found were under leaves; that is, between leaves and stalks of corn. September 30. Bugs very few in corn-field, and plentiful only in the one small patch in millet-field. Mostly mature ; but a few black pupze seen. In corn, they were found for most part between leaf-sheath and stalk, in still green stalks, in much the same situation in which they were found at this time last year. .Plate VI shows the injury to the corn in field C due to chinch- bugs: The wheat-stacks are standing in the wheat-field from which the bugs came. VI.—FIELD OBSERVATIONS. Taken by Mr. M. A. BARBER, during a journey made in the month of July, 1895, through the southeastern portion of Kansas. The following is a summary of the results obtained during a trip in July through a region in the southeastern part of this © state. The route was as follows: From Lawrence to Burling- ton, through the counties of Douglas, Franklin and Coffey ; from Burlington to Fort Scott, through Anderson, Allen and Bourbon counties; and from Fort Scott to Lawrence, through Linn, Miami, Franklin and Douglas counties. The journey occupied about 14 days, from July 4 to July 17, inclusive, and was made on horseback, so that there was opportunity for ex- amining any field along the route. In general the fields ex- amined were those in which the crop consisted of small grain or crops near fields of small grain, although other fields were ah Fifth Annual Report. 35 examined to determine the relative number of bugs in various kinds of crops. Most of the fields along the route in which there was evi- dence that bugs were present, or had been present, were exam- ined, or if there were several such fields in any vicinity under similar conditions, one or more of them were examined to serve as types for the remainder. Besides, a number of fields were examined in which there were no signs of bugs. The quality of the soil, humidity of the soil, condition of crop, injury to crop by chinch-bugs, position of field in relation to other fields, hedges, ditches, etc., the relative number of living chinch-bugs, and the stages of development in which they were, and the presence and relative abundance of Sporotrichum and Empusa, were all noticed. Whenever possible, it was determined whether Sporotrichum had been introduced into the field examined dur- ing the season of 1895, or at any other time, and whether it had ever been introduced into a neighborhood or not. Also, the meteorological conditions prevailing during the time of the journey were noted, and the conditions which had prevailed in the different localities for some time previous were determined in many cases. . There had been flights of chinch-bugs in Douglas county at different times, late in June and early in July, before this trip was begun; and there were evidences in some cases that there had been a scattering of the bugs in localities along the route of the journey. Also, it is very probable that many bugs covered with Sporotrichum and Empusa had been washed away by heavy rains or made to disappear by other causes. This condition necessarily affected the relative abundance of living chinch-bugs in different localities at the time of examination, and the relative amount of bugs covered with Sporotrichum and Empusa as compared with the living. There were in all about 109 examinations made, a single ex- amination sometimes including several adjacent fields. In these examinations chinch-bugs living or dead were found in 92 cases. In these 92 cases Sporotrichum was found in 80 cases and abundantly found in 25 of the 80. Empusa was found in 58 cases in the 92, and abundantly in 15 eases. Twelve cases were noticed in which bugs covered with Empusa nearly equalled or exceeded those with Sporotrichum. In 36 36 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. cases there was apparent injury done to crops, varying in amount from a very narrow strip along the edge of a field to 24 acres. Where several fields immediately adjoined one field from which the bugs had migrated, they are counted as one ease. In 14 cases it was ascertained that Sporotrichum had been artificially introduced into the place examined in 1895; but in the great majority of cases where information:was ob- tained on this point, artificial infection had not been used in 1895. However, there were very few localities visited where artificial infection had not been used at some time, either on the farms examined or in the neighborhood. Of the fields visited there were 35 in which bugs were found to be abundant, or in considerable numbers at least. In some cases two or three of these fields adjoined one another, but, in general, they represent different localities. Of these 35 fields, Sporotrichum was found in 34 cases—abundantly in 19 of the 34. Empusa was found in 24 of the 35, and abundantly in 9. Artificial infection with Sporotrichum was used in 1895 in 7 of the cases in which information was obtained ; in the majority of cases infection had not been employed in 1895, so far as known. In 20 of the 35 fields there was a considerable injury to the crop. The crops were approximately as follows: Commmear wiheat-nela ii rary Sawn g ie Wien Oe ALG ae iad ae RL ARS Seo 13 fields. Conn near 7Ve-Telds fyi5- 3c) Ik as cE Ben ROU ore apa ee ee AO Gorn near Oat HELIS) As ey ONO TI A IN UAV UNE aN PLEAS Gs aN st Corn: nob near small rain. ane aoe ys Neel MCENROE SO pep Ov CO ais eRe en NI Pre Red ANNE Ne RAN PORE RCY a 2c ne ga ACE Dh oye AL a raat a GEN VRE BERN Uc IP RIAN DI: ARDS Waid fh aL hm Oe Se AACN Syst MVE iia iia ea UC Rai la wt Bh Ws eel te DS AM Uae oS LP the In 22 fields the soil was upland; in 10 river or creek bottom. In most of the fields the surface of the soil was moist, and in all, practically, the ground was moist just beneath the surface. The 35 fields in which living bugs were abundant gives per- haps a fairer notion of the distribution of Sporotrichum and Kmpusa than the whole number of cases in which bugs were present, because, where bugs were few, Sporotrichum, if pres- ent, was as a rule correspondingly scarce, and the chances of overlooking it in a field where there is very little of it are much greater than in fields where both living and diseased bugs are relatively abundant. The weather, as noted by myself, for the different days and the localities in which these observations were taken, are as follows: Fifth Annual Report. 37 July 4. Douglas county and northern part of Franklin. Hot to middle of afternoon; showers in late afternoon, and a very heavy rain at night. July 5. Franklin county and northeastern part of Coffey. Cool forenoon, warm and sunny in afternoon. July 6. Coffey county. Warm all day. July 7. Coffey county. Warm, cloudy in afternoon. July 8. Coffey county. Warm all day, with a slight sprinkle. ’ July 9. Coffey county and southern Anderson. Warm and sunny. July 10. Southern Anderson and northeastern Allen county. Cool, cloudy, and rainy. July 11. Bourbon county. Cool, cloudy with rain and mist. July 12. Bourbon county. Cloudy and warm; fields begin- ning to dry. July 18. Linn county. Cloudy all day. Very little rain in afternoon. Surface of soil getting dry in places. July 14. Northern Linn. Sunny all day, with strong wind. Ground drying rapidly. July 15. Linn county and southwestern Miami. Very hot and clear; no wind. July 16. Western part of Miami, and northeastern part of Franklin, and southeastern part of Douglas. Clear; very hot, with strong south wind. July 17. Douglas county. Clear and warm. From information obtained from farmers and others along the route, and from evidences afforded by the soil and the condition of vegetation, it is concluded that there had been sufficient rains to keep the soil moist and. the crops growing well during the latter part of June and the early part of July. In Bourbon county the weather had been wet for some time previous to the time of my visit. In the eastern part of the county it was said to have been too wet for plowing for three or four weeks. In the northern part of the county wheat was found germinating in the spikes on the outer portions of shocks, above the ground, indi- cating that very moist conditions had prevailed for some time. The rain of July 4, and the wet cloudy period of July 10 to 13, inclusive, were general over the portion of the state visited. It is not possible to make many broad generalizations from 38 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. the results obtained during this journey, for although consider- able territory was examined, the fields for the most part were seen but once during the season, and their previous and subse- quent history could not be definitely known. It is safe to assume, however, from the results of these observations, that Sporotrichum was very generally distributed over the territory examined, and this was not the result of artificial dissemination of the disease in 1895. It may, however, have been the result of artificial introduction of the disease in preceding years. Fur- ther, Empusa was found very generally distributed where conditions favored its development. In many of the fields examined the bugs seemed to be dying of Empusa far more rapidly than from Sporotrichum. In these places the hu- midity was great, and in some instances there was evidence that there had been a relatively greater epidemic of Sporotrichum at some previous time. There seemed to be no necessary rela- tion between the prevalence of epidemics and the nature of the soil, except in so far as the character of the soil affected the humidity of the surroundings. Apparently, continued cloudy weather favored epidemics, for there was evidence of a relatively greater diminution in the number of the bugs after the wet, cloudy period which occurred during the journey, and also in those regions where rains had been most abundant during some weeks preceding the obser- vations. | In Bourbon county, for instance, where the weather had been moist for some time, there was evidence of a greater reduction in the number of the bugs than in the part of Douglas county examined during the first day of the journey. It is not easy to give a general estimate of the damage to crops, for in many cases the crops had been harvested and in others it was not always possible to determine whether the damage observed was wholly due to chinch-bugs or to other agencies as well. Besides the condition of the crop when the invasion of insects occurred and for some time subsequently could not be accurately de- termined in all cases. Living chinch-bugs were found in dif- ferent stages of development in most of the cases examined, but black pupz and mature insects were most abundant. Fifth Annual Report. 39 VII.—FIELD OBSERVATIONS. Taken by Mr. W. W. Brown in Coffey county during June, 1895. The field which I observed was one belonging to Mr. Throck- morton, living about two miles north of Burlington. Mr. Throckmorton got the infection from me, and infected the field himself. The work of infection was commenced early in May. In about two weeks the bugs began dying. On the 3d of June I visited the field and found many old bugs dead. I went to different parts of the field and found bugs dead everywhere, but more numerous in the low places of the field. The field is rather low ground. Dry weather had been prevalent, but on the 30th of May there had been arain. I found many young red bugs on the ground and a little way up the stalks of the wheat. I found some young bugs dead, but very few. June 4. I again visited the field for the purpose of picking up fungus-covered bugs. I picked up 150 boxes for distribu- tion among the farmers. I found the bugs as they were yester- day except that they were moving over the ground more. I thought there were more young bugs dead, but perhaps in pick- ing I could observe more closely and thus could see the smaller fungus more readily. June 8. I went with Marshall Barber to the field. The weather was dryer than when I was there on the 4th, no rain having fallen since the 3d. We visited many parts of the field and found dead bugs, both old and young, in every part. Mr. Throckmorton was still spreading the infection, picking it up in one part and putting it where the bugs were advancing into an adjoining oat-field. There were no changes observable in the condition of the bugs except they had grown blacker, and there were more young bugs dead. We made a careful estimate of the proportion of young and old bugs dead, and we found it to be about seven young bugs to one old. We also found the in- fection in a field a half mile distant in which it had not been put this year, but was put in 1894. June 13. I went to the field and picked up 100 boxes of bugs—fungus covered. A heavy rain had fallen on the 11th, and I could not find many fungus-covered old bugs, but there were very many young bugs covered with fungus, too small to pick up for the boxes. We found the bugs gathering and be- 40 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. ginning to moult, and some were already moulted. Many had gone to an adjoining corn-field and had killed some of the stalks. They had been yery numerous in the wheat, but had not yet proceeded far into the corn. They were not working so fast in this field as in an adjoining field not infected. June 17. Bugs nearly all gone from wheat-field. Visited corn-field, and found afew dead bugs atthe hills. Bugs piling up, and a good many winged bugs to befound. The bugs were going from the corn to an oat-field on the east. They were all, or nearly all, black, and were well grown and winged. Bugs on east side of oats came out of a wheat-field, and along this side infection had been placed. The dead bugs here covered the ground, numbering about 30 to the square inch. One thing was noticeable: the bugs were mostly red, indicafing, we thought, that they were still coming from the wheat-field as they hatched. There seemed to be three kinds of fungi—the sporo, another of a watery color, and another of a silken or webby appearance. The oat-field was beside a corn-field, and the bugs came from the wheat-field into the oats and corn alike. In the corn they were dying very slowly, only a few at each hill; but in the oats, 10 feet distant, they were as above described. Infection had been placed in corn and oats alike. June 20. Visited the oat-field and picked up 134 boxes for distribution. The dead bugs were about twice as numerous as they were three days ago. The living had decreased to about one-tenth of what they were. I cannot say what became of them. Probably, being older and stronger, more of them than of the young bugs had burrowed into the ground when dying. They had moved a little farther into the oats, but not sufficient, I think, to account for the great decrease. The bugs that were there were not eating, but slowly crawling over the ground or piling up to moult. Young bugs were still coming from the wheat-field. The bugs had not gone over 20 yards into the oats, and had hurt the oats only about eight feet. They were not dying, or at least very slowly, in the corn, only a few being dead at each hill. The ground was dryer than on the 17th. The weather up to this time had been good growing weather, but at no time during the entire spring could it be considered. wet. JI have come to the conclusion that the infection will work readily in the ordinary season in oats and wheat, due to Fifth Annual Report. Ay the moisture in the bottom, but not in small corn; not enough to be practical. What might be done in wetter weather, I am not able to say. The water-colored greenish fungus mentioned in report of 17th is more numerous to-day, and more vigorous, not, however, in very great quantity. From this time on my observations were not confined to this field. About the Ist of July a little rain fell, and reports came in that the bugs were dying in the corn-fields very rapidly. On the 4th of July a heavy rain fell, and wet weather followed. From the 1st to the 15th the bugs were killed by the fungus on nearly every field where they were so far as I could learn. [I concluded that there was another cause at work to render the fungus more effective than that of rainy weather, from the fact that from the Ist to the 4th there was but little more moisture than during the days immediately preceding, and not so much as during the early part of June. Yet reports came in that the bugs were dying rapidly in the corn-fields before the rains of the 4th and the days following. VITI.— CONSIDERATION REGARDING STATUS OF SPORO- TRICHUM. We have said that the conditions upon which the spread of Sporotrichum among chinch-bugs depends are complex and not entirely understood. We will here offer certain considerations regarding the status of Sporotrichum which may be suggestive to those interested in the work of the Station of the difficulty of reaching positive conclusions without data ranging over a long series of years and embracing a wide range of meteoro- logical conditions. A.—That Sporotrichum generally throughout the state survived the winter of 1894-95 is indicated by the following: 1. It was found in 1895, early in the spring and at different times during the year, in many fields where no Sporotrichum had been artificially introduced in 1895. It was present in a great majority of fields examined where bugs were abundant, and was found in different parts of the state. 2. Chinch-bugs sent to this Station from many different lo- 42 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. calities were, in almost all cases, already infected with Sporo- trichum. 3. Sporotrichum was found in healthy condition out of doors in January, 1895, and again about April 1, 1895. B.—That Sporotrichum survives all winter conditions which chinch-bugs withstand, and that artificial infection ts consequently in most cases not necessary is indicated by the following: 1. Its survival of the winter of 1894-95. 2. Probability that no conditions exist which would allow bugs to hibernate safely, and at the same time destroy wholly the spores of Sporotrichum, which it would seem have, on | account of their small size and great abundance, as good a chance of finding effectual shelter as the bugs themselves. 3. General epidemics of Sporotrichum have been noted in other years before artificial spread of this disease was employed. 4. The wide-spread occurrence in 1895 of a species of Em- pusa on chinch-bugs; a species which, so far as known, has not been artificially disseminated since the years 1892 and 1893, and then not widely. C.—The validity of the arguments under B, namely, that Sporo- trichum survives all winter conditions which chinch-bugs can with- stand, depends, toa great extent at least, on the following assumptions: 1. That the winter conditions of 1894—’95 are similar to those of other winters, so far as the possibility of their effectually destroying Sporotrichum is concerned. 2. That Sporotrichum will be present with chinch-bugs in their winter quarters, and be exposed to practically similar con- ditions. 3. That the epidemics in question were present so generally that the possibility that the disease may have spread from certain specially favored localities is excluded. 4. That the species of Empusa referred to bears the same re- lation to destroying agencies that Sporotrichum does, so far as the continuance of the disease from year to year is concerned. D.— Proposition B, namely, that Sporotrichum survives all winter conditions which the chinch-bug can withstand is opposed by the following : i sm Chinch-bugs from different localities have been kept, with- out the addition of infection, in moist jars or boxes and have re- ape Fifth Annual Report. 43 mained free from Sporotrichum ; while bugs infected and kept in similar jars have been found dead with Sporotrichum on them. This has been done at different times and in different states. 2. Localities have been reported in which bugs were abun- dant, but no Sporotrichum could be found. E.— The validity of the arguments ae D depend on the follow- ing assumptions : 1. That the chinch-bugsin the check-jars were, in all respects, under conditions favoring the appearance of the fungus if it had been present. 2. That conditions favoring the development of Sporotrichum prevailed in the localities mentioned at the time when the fungus was sought; so that if it had been present, it would have become visible. Further that the search was complete enough to have discovered any fungus-covered bugs if they had been present. Nore.— Different lots of chinch-bugs kept in jars under conditions, so far as known, similar for all, have shown very different results as regards the develop- ment of Sporotrichum i in different jars. F.—Further evidence on the above question may be sons et from the following sources : 1. Localities may be found in which the chinch-bugs prevail that are so situated that it is not possible for Sporotrichum to have been artificially introduced. 2. It may be determined whether Sporotrichum continues to survive a long series of winters, as it apparently has done in the years 1894-’95. We suggest the following final considerations : A. Sporotrichum was well distributed in this state at the begin ning of the season of 1895, so that the question of whether or not infection was present does not enter into the explanation of the varying results observed in fields where bugs were abun- dant. B. It is very "probable that where Sporotrichum and Empusa are present serious epidemics may occur if certain conditions 44 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. are present. These conditions we do not know exactly, but it is probable that the following tend to promote epidemics : 1. Humidity, resulting — (a) From sufficient rain or cloudy weather. (6) From conditions of soil or surrounding vegetation which tend to retain moisture. 2. Increased susceptibility of insects to diseases. This pos- sibly may come about — (a) From exhaustion after breeding, laying of eggs, etc., and the weakening of the insect at old age. (6) From the weakening effect of unfavorable meteorological conditions. (c) From the effect of other diseases or pathological conditions of some kind. C. 1. It is more than probable that Sporotrichum is always present to a greater or less extent in any locality, and that the amount of it depends primarily upon the number of chinch-bugs and the condition of the weather. 2. Since dry weather favors the multiplication of the chinch- bug and is detrimental to the development of Sporotrichum, the assumption seems reasonable that a series of dry years would result in an increase of chinch-bugs without a corresponding increase of Sporotrichum. 3. In such an event we would conclude that the artificial in- troduction of Sporotrichum would result in the destruction of more bugs than would naturally occur. 4. Finally, with these considerations, we suggest that it is best for the farmer to see that the diseases are present in his fields, so that if favorable conditions arise, an epidemic may re- sult; but it is not wise to put entire dependence on infectious diseases, for it is uncertain whether these conditions may arise, or, if they do, whether they may be in time to materially aid the crops. IX.— THE BARRIER METHOD. The habit of chinch-bugs of leaving the small-grain fields in a body about harvest-time, and migrating to the corn-fields, where they literally blacken the first few rows, is too well known by farmers to dwell upon. The bugs go on foot in’these migra- tions, and the winged ones are seldom known to fly. At such times it is possible to trap and destroy the bugs almost utterly. ~~ . =a Fifth Annual Report. 45 Various methods of accomplishing this have been in vogue for many years. As soon as it was seen that infectious diseases would probably not always be efficient in destroying the chinch-bugs in sufficient numbers to save the crops, our assistant, Mr. Marcy, turned his attention to coal-tar, petroleum and salt as barriers to keep the bugs from entering the corn-fields.. The plan found most effect- ive was that of turning a double furrow with a plow and thus forming a ridge, and putting the tar, etc., on top of this ridge. On the side of the ridge next to the small grain, post-holes were dug broadening toward the bottom, about 100 feet apart. . The bugs were retarded in their march by the ridge, and being repelled by the tar, etc., would swarm along the ridge, and in so doing would crowd each other into the post-holes. In some cases, when the holes were nearly filled with bugs, dirt was thrown in and packed down; in others a little petroleum was, poured. Both methods were effective in killing the bugs. It was found that where the holes were deep the bugs died with- out any special effort to destroy them. After the ridges are thrown by the plow it is best to smooth and pack down the top and sides somewhat, in order to keep the tar, etc., from sinking in deeply and to protect the ridge from too great washing away by rains. This process was neces- sarily slow and tedious by hand, and to obviate this a drag with a concave bottom of the form of the ridge was made, and when weighted with rocks or dirt and drawn by horses over the ridge it did very effective service, saving a vast amount of time and doing the work better than could be done by hand. The bot- tom of the drag was found to scour much better when covered with sheet zinc. Coal-tar as it comes from the gas-works, crude petroleum ase= taken from the oil-well and kerosene oil mixed with salt were used on the ridges. These substances are offensive to the bugs, and they seldom attempt to cross them or even to come close enough to touch them, but on approaching these offensive substances the bugs turn and run along the ridge in the evident hope of finding a gap through which they may pass. Coal-tar is the best of the substances named in that it stands on the surface better and is not so readily washed away by rains. However, crude petroleum and kerosene are very effi- ™ Aone ate vary 46 Contagious Diseases of the Chinch-bug. cient and are more generally available than the coal-tar. The coal-tar can be easily applied by means of an old teakettle, sprinkler, or coffee-pot. The stream poured upon the ridge need not be more than half an inch in diameter, and when of this size the operator should walk rather rapidly in applying it. Where coal-tar is not available, crude petroleum or kerosene oil may be mixed with common coarse salt and a line of this may be strewn on the ridge with the hand or in any other man- ner preferred by the operator. All of these substances are © cheap enough to be profitably used. The results of this method of combating chinch-bugs were well shown by experiments in a wheat-field. The bugs were noticed early in this wheat, and just before harvest and before the bugs had migrated to the corn the ridge was thrown up, coal-tar was applied and the post-holes dug. The bugs which collected and died in the first few holes were taken out and piled near the holes in great quantities. Only a few bugs escaped, and no damage was done the corn. In another case, the bugs had left the wheat and Hal ad- vanced about 50 rows in the corn, destroying it utterly as they advanced. Sporotrichum had been: scattered abundantly in the field, but although many bugs died of the disease, the injury to the corn was not materially abated. Then the ridge was thrown up,, tar was put on, and post-holes dug. The result > was that the bugs were caught and died in the holes, so that the corn suffered no further injury. These two instances dem- onstrate the value of the barrier method described above. Equally good results were obtained with kerosene oil mixed with salt. If the ridge is not formed and the offensive sub- stances are simply spread upon the ground, the bugs, when in great numbers, crowd each other across the barrier, those in front being unwillingly carried forward by those behind; or, if the post-holes are omitted, the bugs are not destroyed, and manage finally to straggle into the corn-field after the barrier has become damaged by the weather. ° The barrier method has the advantage of not being dependent upon a complexity of conditions for its success, and of giving immediate results. It has the disadvantage of being only ap- plicable at the very short time when the bugs are migrating from one field to another. It cannot be used upon bugs already >