Me ante tea van 3 eas . eee eteage tle SR IY ~ ee; af: Fe Daw ey ien NWT EN ETE te Teeter eA fo rat ra r - oe Se Fees, soe ~e- eR , 4 < ; . rs ‘ = [al ‘ 12 q Z ba Pion ol SH ‘ ee ——— reels ~ fr y dtr ¢ sah . os » 1 . var » Te ee TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, HARRISBURG, PA.: HARRISBURG PUBLISHING CO., STATE PRINTER. 1907. OFFICIAL DOCUMENT, No. 7. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. OFFICIAL LIST. 1906. N. B. CRITCHFIELD, Secretary, Stoyestown, Somerset County. A. L. MARTIN, Dep’y Sec’y and Director of Farmers’ Institutes, Enon Valley, Lawrence County. M. D. LICHLITER, Chief Clerk, Allegheny. E. C. FIRST, Stenographer, Harrisburg. GEORGE F. BARNES, Messenger, Rossville, York County. B. H. WARREN, Dairy and Food Commissioner, West Chester, Chester County. O. D. SCHOCK, Assistant to Dairy and Food Cominissioner, Hamburg, Berks County. MAY V. RHONE, Clerk, Dairy and Food Commissioner, Centre Hall, Centre County. WILLIAM R. SWARTZ, Messenger, Dairy and Food Commissioner, Duncannon, Perry County. H. A. SURFACE, Economic Zoologist, State College, Centre County. NORMAN G. MILLER, Assistant Heonomie Zoologist, Marion, Franklin County. A. F, SATTERTHWAIT, Clerk, Economic Zoologist, Kennett Square, Chester County. KATHRYN P. FIRST, Stenographer, Economic Zoologist, Harrisburg. L. R. WHITE, Messenger, Economic Zoologist. Jermyn, Lackawanna County. LEONARD PEARSON, State Veterinarian, Philadelphia. (1) 1—7—1906. OFFICIAL DOCUMENT, No. 7. TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE LIBR Sectclary ol Agriculture. NEW ¥ TAN GAK Department of Agriculture, Harrisburg, Pa., Jan. 1, 1907. To His Excellency, Samuel W. Pennypacker, Governor of Pennsyl- vania : Sir: In compliance with the requirements of the Act of Assembly, creating a Department of Agriculture of Pennsylvania, I have the honor to submit my report of said Department for the year 1906. The past year has marked much advance in the agriculture of Pennsylvania. The swing toward the West of the pendulum of agricultural progress is slacking and a new era appears to be setting in for the farms and farmers of the Eastern states. There was a time when this was the leading farming state of the Union, a time when civilization was but feeling its way beyond the Allegheny Mountains. As Ohio and, later, the other states of ‘the Ohio, Mississippi and Missouri valleys developed, the center of the agricultural industry moved steadily westward. The virgin, . fertile lands of the West were given free to settlers, who divided the prairies into productive farms, the products of which were taken to the eastern markets upon the railroads that rapidly gridironed the new country and made possible the most marvellous development the world has ever seen. The agriculture of the West developed more rapidly than the population of the country, so that an enormous surplus of grain, food stuffs and provisions was available for export. The Western farmer farmed, at first, without regard to the future of the soil. He mined and marketed the great stores of surplus fer- tility that had been accumulating for centuries. His land produced cheap and bountiful harvests. The settlers of the West were drawn largely from the older states of the East and for a generation many of the most capable and ambitious as well ‘as the restless sons of -Kastern farmers migrated to the West and took part in its develop- ment. ~~ Under such conditions of competition, the agriculture of ‘the East, oft a third of a century, languished. Prices were at such a level as * ‘to vender it diffienlt to conduct a farm profitably unless it was de- itn < G2) _>~ ey 4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. voted to the production of crops that did not have to meet direct competition with staple products of the West. The farmers of the Eastern states have found themselves in much the condition and confronted by problems similar to those that have influenced the course of agriculture in those countries of Europe that are not shielded by a protective tariff. The wheat-growing and the meat- producing farms of Great Britain and the grain fields of northern and south-eastern Europe have been affected by the same causes and in the same way as the general farms of Pennsylvania, New York and Maryland. Gradually, however, the good lands of the West have been oc- cupied and their surplus stores of fertility are so far used up that it is now necessary to farm less extensively, with more skill and at higher cost. Moreover, great cities have grown up in the Valley of the Mississippi and these are rapidly increasing in number and population. There is, therefore, at the present time a home market in the Central West and the West, that requires large and con- tinually larger supplies of food, thus reducing the surplus for ship- ment to distant places. During these years of transition, the farmers of the East, with much stress and trial, have been adjusting themselves and their properties to the new and, apparently inexorable conditions. They have sought and practised new methods and have become proficient therein; methods that ‘are in accord with the modern science of agri- culture. They made their minds receptive to the teachings of the successful experience of others and to the guidance of those who are devoting themselves to the elucidation of the problems of the farm. They have either learned to meet the new adverse conditions —or they have lost in their contest with changing, modern economic forces. And now, that this battle has been fought, the conditions are readjusting in such a way as to lessen the competition of the West and, by reason of the growth of the population, to increase the local home market. These influences have led to better conditions that are reflected in the greater prosperity of farmers and in higher prices for farm products and farm lands. The outlook for Eastern agriculture was never brighter; but the advantages that are opening are not for those who fail to recognise that eonditions have changed and that methods and practices, to be successful, must fit the time. We do not for an instant recommend the relinquishment of the old and well ‘tried methods of those who went before us. On the contrary, our chief reliance must always be in the_old well understood and tested methods. But no method should be adhered to merely because it is old, or because it has the sanction of the approval of a community; no method should be re- garded as good enough so long as there is a possibility of improving it and new methods should not be frowned upon because they are new, but they should be viewed impartially, with a mind open to conviction, and with the determination to take advantage of the good that they contain. In this way, by holding fast to the traditions of the past and that which is tried and true and at the same time by seeking and testing new methods and improvements, the most con- servative, the safest and the best advance is made. As the new is found to be secure it may be relied upon. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 5 e EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES. In tthis development, Pennsylvania has been among the foremost of the states of the Union and her schools and colleges, especially the institutions furnishing technical instruction in agriculture and the allied subjects, have done much good. The good of these institu- tions has been disseminated and added to by the farmers’ institutes and the Bulletins of this Department. It is one thing to produce new knowledge; it is quite another thing to bring it before the practical farmer so that he will realize its importance and be in position to take advantage of it. The persistent, systematic work of the lecturers upon the farmers’ institute staff is of the greaitest value to the State in this connection. Reference has been made in previous reports to the work of the Pennsylvania. State College. This institution was established by the State Agricultural Society in 1854 as the Farmers’ High School. It was opened in 1859, and was intended to be a place where farmers’ sons, and others interested in, or intending to engage in agriculture, might obfain suitable scientific and practical instruction. The found- ers were interested in establishing an institution where a new kind of instruction would be furnished such as was not then supplied in any existing institution. It is unnecessary to trace the changes of name, policy and work of the college, but it may be said that it appears to be unfortunate that it did not more closely follow the example of that other pioneer school of agriculture established about the same time at Lansing, Michigan; for, in its endeavor to cover much ground, some of which was already well covered by existing institutions, the tax upon the resources of the college was such as to hamper the development ‘of the agricultural department. The trustees of the college have now, happily, taken the position that their foundation was not laid for the erection of a University or for the development of an institution to duplicate unnecessarily work already well done in the twenty-seven colleges and universities of Pennsylvania. They now recognize that in the field of agriculture, there is much need for the work of the college and this is beginning to receive more adequate support from the trustees and from the legislature than ever before. The agricultural people of Pennsylvania are responsible for what may be termed the revival of interest in agriculture at State College. The trustees of the college are to be congratulated upon their ap- proval of the well considered proposals for the development of the work that the college was founded to carry on, and it is to be hoped that this work will have the general and active support of the farmers of the State. A farm school hag been established near Doylestown, in Bucks County, through contributions made by individuals. This school has been in operation several years and has steadily grown in its equip- ment and resources. [t is appropriate that it should be mentioned in a public document, first, because it promises to be of service in attracting young men of the Jewish race from the crowded cities to the country, and in preparing them for agricultural careers. This work is an expression of a desire among sociologists 'to foster some of the undeveloped resources of the country and, at the same time, to lessen some of the overcrowding of congested districts of cities. 6 ANNUAL REPORT UF THE Off. Doe. The policy of this school is determined to a large extent, and is wisely directed, by Rabbi Krauskopf. A second reason for calling atten- tion to this institution is that it is fostered by the State through a biennial appropriation of $15,000. It is believed that there is a considerable field of usefulness for work of the character that th's school is doing, and it is deserving of the commendation of this Department. A few of the rural high schools in Pennsylvania, and particularly that at Waterford, in Erie County, have developed courses of instruc- tion in agriculture. This movement is a very important one, and its development is a thing greatly to be desired. The rural high schooi reaches rural sentiment in a way that is impossible for a distaat college. Of course the agricultural instruction furnished in a high school must be rather elementary, but if it is well thought out and systematized it may be made to be of much value. By means of it, the reason for things is emphasized and the pupils are placed in position to draw sound conclusions from ascertained facts. Pro- fessor L. H. Bailey, in an address on “The Schools of the Future,” expresses himself as follows: “In an agricultural community, for example, all the farms of the neighborhood will afford training in the elements of failure and success. Yhere is no reason why the pupils should not know why and how a man succeeds with his orchard or dairy or factory, as well as to have the cyclopedic infor- mation about the names of capes and mountains, dates, and the like; and why should not every good farmer explain his operations to the pupils? Such work, if well done, would vitalize the school and lift it clean out of the ruts of tradition and custom. It would make a wholly new enterprise of the school, rendering it as broad and Significant and native as the community itself; not a puny exotic eff- ort for some reason dropped down in the neighborhood. When the public schools begin to touch experience and pursuits in a perfectly frank and natural way, we hope that persons who have money to give for education will bestow some of it on elementary and country schools, where it will reach the very springs of life.” This idea is graduaily being accepted and it means much for the improvement of country life. The Veterinary Department of the University of Pennsylvania must also be mentioned as one of the important institutions of the State for furnishing instruction in some of the subjects allied to agriculture. This Department was established in 1884, and has been conducted by the University since that time. It has always been hampered by lack of funds, and its work has been made pos- sible through the generosity of a few philanthropic citizens of Phila- delphia and by the self-sacrificing devotion of members of its teach- ing staff. It has graduated nearly 400 veterinarians, many of whom are sons of Pennsylvania farmers, and many are located in the rural districts of Pennsylvania. The importance of preventing infectious diseases of animals and of developing animal hygiene is generally recognized. The ruinous losses that have affected many com- munities and countries and that have come from neglect of the teachings of veterinary science are such as to make clear the great need for the kind of work that this school is doing. The State has assisted the University of Pennsylvania in providing a building ‘to house this school, but thus far, no appropriation has been made No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 7 for the maintenance of its work. Other states, notably, our neigh- bors, New York and Ohio, have found it profitable to take pant in the support of the veterinary departments of their state universities. The need for the work of such a school is so great as to fully justify a recommendation to the legislature that it give careful heed to a request for public support for this work at the University of Penn- sylvania, as recommended by several of the leading agricultural and livestock organizations. In this connection, mention may be made of a report of a com- mission, appointed by your Excellency, to consider regulations to govern meat inspectors in disposing of the carcasses of animals afflicted with tuberculosis. The Commission appointed to consider this problem is composed of leading sanitarians of Pennsylvania, assisted by one from outside of the State, Dr. D. E. Salmon, lately chief of the Bureau of Animal Industry of the United States Depart- ment of Agriculture. Considering the investigation to be made by this Commission of very great importance to the livestock industry of the State as well as to the health of the people of the Common- wealth, and believing that in order to get Dr. Salmon, who is not a citizen of Pennsylvania, to devote to it the time necessary to make his part of the investigation and report as thorough as these com- bined interests require, a contract was made with Dr. Salmon, after consultation with the State Veterinarian, in which it was stipulated that his investigation should be made as complete as the facilities at his command would warrant, and ‘that he should submit to this Department a report upon the relation of bovine tuberculosis to public health that should be approved by the State Veterinarian. This contract was made under the provisions of Section 6 of the Act of March 13, 1895, and Dr. Salmon’s report will be published in a bulletin of this Department which will also contain the reports of the other genilemen associated with him upon the Commmission referred to, whose services were cheerfully given ‘to this important work on account of their patriotic devotion to their own State. 1 regard this report as being of so much importance that I wish especially to invite to it the attention of all persons interested in this much discussed and far reaching problem. MEAT INSPECTION. The Federal Government has recently enacted and placed in operation a new meat inspection law, under which the federal meat inspection service is greatly extended. It now covers practically all meats that are prepared in one state and shipped to another. The slaughter houses and other meat preparing establishments engaged in business exclusively in one state do not come under federal inspection. It has been found that the effect of the guar- antee that accompanies federally inspected products is of consider- able advantage to dealers, and it is steadily receiving more con- sideration and respect from the public. If this tendency becomes much stronger, the products of local houses that are without in- spection will be found to be at a decided disadvantage in the public markets. The effect of this will be to hamper the development of local slaughter houses ‘and to advance the interests of those estab- lishments that are under approved inspection. This will have a 8 ANNUAL REPORT CF THE Off. Doc. tendency to diminish local slaughtering and thereby lessen the market for beef prepared in our own State. For this reason, and also more particularly on account of the hygienic and sanitary im- portance of meat inspection, it is to be hoped that the coming legis- lature of 1907 will give careful consideration to a proposal to establish a State meat inspection service. THE MAGNITUDE OF OUR AGRICULTURE. Pennsylvania is commonly regarded as an essentially industrial state. When the industries of the State are passed in mental re- view, one thinks of the great manufacturing enterprises, the steel mills, the mines of bituminous and anthracite coal, the oil and gas wells and the great natural deposits of iron ore, limestone, cement, rock and slate. In the minds of many people, agriculture is an after consideration. The industries mentioned are so large, and many of them are so much greater than similar industries in other states that the actual and intrinsic importance of our agriculture is not generally realized. If Pennsylvania had no more than the usual quota of mineral deposits and of manufacturing plants, she would still occupy a distinguished position among her sister commonwealths on account of the extent and value of her agriculture. Pennsylvania is second in the production of hay. The crop for the year 1906 amounted to 3,993,627 tons and was worth $53,514,602. Pennsylvania is also second in the production of buckwheat; the crop for 1906 amounted to 4,788,000 bushels, and it is second in the production of potatoes, producing during the past year 23,856,918 bushels. The value of the winter wheat crop was $22,095,623 and was surpassed by but five states. In rye, Pennsylvania led all other states with a crop of 6,025,011 bushels. The value of the oat crop was $12,090,268 and the corn crop $30,139,324. The value of the farm products of Penn- sylvania is just about equal to the value of farm products of some of the great agricultural states of the West. The most productive and the best farmed agricultural county in the United States is the County of Lancaster, in Pennsylvania, which sells from its farms products valued at about $10,000,000 a year. In livestock husbandry, Pennsylvania holds a very important position. More market milk is produced in this State than in any other, and there are, upon the farms of Pennsylvania, 1,097,590 milch cows, the estimated value of which is $57,640,337. There are in Pennsylvania about 750,000 horses and mules, worth about $75,- 006,000. Whe horses of Pennsylvania are 40 per cent. more numerous and worth 100 per cent. more money than the horses of Kentucky, a leading horse state. Pennsylvania has more than a million sheep; more, in fact, than the states of Illinois or Wisconsin and more than Missouri and Kansas combined. The sheep industry of Pennsylvania would be more highly devel- oped and more productive than it is if it were not for the pest of dogs. Some legislation should be enacted to eliminate the worthless and ownerless dogs that are of no value whatever and that inflict extreme injury upon this important industry. There are about 1,000,000 swine in Pennsylvania, valued at $8,- 447,313. The swine industry is capable of profitable extension. By No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 9 regard for the ascertained facts of hygiene, it is possible to avoid most of the danger from hog cholera. With this foe under control, the keeper of swine, with judicious management, has little to fear from other diseases. The market for hogs is so good that Penn- sylvania farmers should arrange to derive more benefit from it. WORK DONE BY THE DEPARTMENT. T shall not take up space in this report to dwell at length upon the work done by the respective Divisions of the Department, each of which has an official head whose report will be given to the public either with the Annual Department Report or in bulletin form. Owing to the existence of an Act of Assembly prohibiting more than one publication of a public document, the custom that prevailed in the past of publishing these Division reports as bulletins and also as a part of the Annual Department Report, has been discontinued. Where, as is the case with the Dairy and Food Bureau, many persons who are not directly interested in Agriculture and who have but little interest in the Department Report are anxious to get the Commissioner’s report, it may be thought best to have such report published in bulletin form. The report of the State Veterinarian also is sought for by all the Veterinarians of the State as well as by the keepers of abattoirs and dealers in meat supplies, persons who care little for the Department Report, and as a measure of economy in their distribution, it may be considered best that these reports shall be published in bulletin form, and if they should not appear in the Annual Department Report, persons wishing for specific information relating to the work of these two Divisions are referred to the Department bulletins spoken of, which will be issued if it is finally determined not to publish these two Division reports with the Annual Department Report. Full information concerning the work of the Division of Farmers’ Institutes and that of Economic Zoology will be found under the proper heads in the following pages. It may not be amiss to say that the work of the four Divisions during the year has been characterized by persistent activity and fruitful of good results, meeting the hearty approval of the Head of the Department. The Farmers’ Institute work under the proficient management of Director A. L. Martin is uniform!y increasing in public favor. Farmers are realizing the importance of the instruc- tion given at these meetings more and more every year, so that the demand for more institutes is constantly becoming greater. I would therefore recommend that the appropriation for this work be largely increased. The work of the Division of Economic Zoolesy has been carried forward during the vear with the energy and diligence that are dis- tinguishing characteristics of Prof. H. A. Surface, Chief of the Divi- sion. As reports have been received of the devastation of growing crops by insect foes, information has been sent out giving -instruc- tion for the use of known remedies, and in cases where reports have come to the Department indicating that some new or unknown in- sect-pest has made its appearance, competent assistants have been sent out to make investigation. In many instances the investiga- tions have been continued in the laboratory connected with this Divi- sion, the policy being not only to apply knowledge that has been . 10 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Offi, Doc: proven to be correct, but to discover new and more efficient means for the destruction of enemies whose habiis are known, and to find out what may be learned of the life history of others that are not so well understood. This work is greatly appreciated by the farmers and fruit growers of the State, and as the demand for work of this character is constantly increasing, I deem it proper to call the atten- tion of the General Assembly to its importance, and suggest that it be supported by liberal appropriation. The work of the StateVeterinarian has been in great demand during the year. Several outbreaks of Glanders among horses and mules have occurred, and in a number of instances he was called out to investigate diseases of livestock unfamiliar to the people of the community where they appeared, and to every call he responded with the promptness for which his work has been noted ever since his connection with the Department. The duties of the State Veter- inarian combined with his work as Secretary and Executive officer of the State Livestock Sanitary Board, are more than a man even of Doctor Pearson’s vigor and robust constitution should be ex- pected to perform, and the work of his Division is so important, not only to the livestock interests of the State, but to the health of the public, that proper measures should be taken to provide for him the help so much needed. I would respectfully recommend that this matter receive the careful consideration of the General As- sembly and that at the next biennial session an Assistant State Veterinarian and adequate clerical help be provided for this import- ant Division. The most important work committed to this Department is that of protecting the food supplies of the people of the State from adulteration, and the energy ‘that has characterized the efforts of Dairy and Food Commissioner Warren to secure this result has been most commendable, receiving the approval of the Head of the De- partment and the public at large. The vigilance with which the Commissioner has administered the laws regulating ‘the sale of oleomargarine and providing for pure dairy supplies is worthy of special mention, and has received from the farmers and dairymen of the State the approval it merits. The Department did not during the year relax the energy with which the law regulating the sale of Feeding Stuffs was adminis- tered during the year 1905. It is unfortunate that so many com- paratively worthless feeds should have found their way into the markets of the State. Farmers and others having the care of domestic animals have in recent years been greatly embarrassed to know what feeds may be relied upon as furnishing proper nutriment and at the same time being free from any deleterious or injurious effects upon the animals consuming them. The chemical and micro- scopic examination of the samples of feeds collected by the agents of the Department have revealed the fact that many of the mixed feeds having high sounding names are quite deficient in real feeding value, and in some instances contained substances detrimental to the health of ‘animals. In every case, where there was found to be a clear violation of our Feeding Stuffs law, prosecutions were in- stituted and the effect of the vigorous crusade that has been kept up during the last two years has been to drive many of the more worth No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 11 less and deceptive feeds from the markets of the State. It is worthy of note that comparatively few of the fraudulent and defective feeds were manufactured within our own State. Among the samples collected by the agents of the Department, there were many that represented condimental feeds sold under the name of stock and poultry foods. An examination of these showed that they contained a small per cent. of feeding value which was usually derived from cottonseed or linseed meal, corn meal or other ground grain, to which was added wood-ashes, charcoal, sul- phur, common salt, Epsom salts, coperas or iron oxide, crashed weed seeds and a small per cent. of powdered gentian and fenugreek seed. The selling prices of these condimental feeds as reported by our agents, are entirely out of proportion to their real value. If such articles are to be sold under names that indicate ‘that they possess any feeding value, | regard it as important that they be placed under the same legal provisions regulating the sale of other feeding stuffs. The owners of livestock should ‘be protected from the imposition they suffer at the hands of the compounders and vendors of all such materials, and | would commend such legislation to the consideration of the law makers of the State. The work of Linseed Oil examination as provided for by Act of 23 April, 1901, was continued at intervals during the year, and it is gratifying to be able to repeat what was stated in last year’s report, that a comparatively small per cent. of the samples examined were found to be adulterated. Of the 503 samples examined during the last two years, but 26, or 5 per cent. of the whole were adulterated. Owing to the large and constantly increasing purposes to which linseed oil is applied as used in paints and varnishes, as well as in the linoleum, rubber and soap industries, all of great importance to the citizens of the Commonwealth, it is important that these ex- aminations shall continue to be made. The cost is quite small and is abundantly recompensed by the result of keeping the supply of this important commodity pure. The examination by chemical analysis of the Commercial Fertil- izers sold within the State received the attention that has been given it in the past. Fourteen agents were employed during both spring and fall sampling seasons, to gather in specimens of the fertil- izers found upon the market, which were analyzed and results made public through the bulletins of the Department. While most of the fertilizers sold show a disposition upon the part of manufacturers to meet the guarantee they are required by law to file with this Department, it is to be regretted that in some instances (far too many) either carelessness or a desire to secure undue profits leads to abuses that ought to be corrected. Section 5 of the Act of 25 March, 1901, commonly known as the Fertilizer Law, provides a penalty for furnishing a guarantee that is misleading or false, and makes it the duty of the Secretary of Agriculture to enforce the provisions of the act, but unfortunately the amount of money that may be used for this purpose after deduct- ing the cost of securing s samples and having the same analyzed, is not sufficient to cover the expense that must be incurred in prosecutions were brought in every instance where there is reason to believe that the action would be sustained by the courts. For this reason the 12 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. Department has been obliged to move with caution, and institute proceedings only in cases where a disposition to defraud seems plain. If an appropriation were made by the Legislature to sufficiently in- crease the funds now available for the enforcement of the law to warrant the employment of a general agent whose duty it should be to bring prosecutions, secure witnesses and attend hearings before local magistrates and follow cases where necessary into court, I have no doubt that in many instances the fertilizers upon the market would be greatly improved. Such legislation is recom- mended to the careful consideration of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth. I desire also to renew the recommendation made in last year’s report that manufacturers of fertilizers sold within the State be required to supplement the statement they now make concerning the fertilizing ingredients their products contain, by a statement of the sources from which such fertilizing ingredients are derived. This is something the farmer needs to know, in order that he may apply his fertilizers intelligently. The laws regulating the sale of fer- tilizers in some of the states, require this information to be given; and in a state like Pennsylvania where the amount expended for fertilizers runs into millions of dollars, this information ought not to be withheld. Investigations have been made during the year, under the pro- vision of the Act of March 13, 1895, relating to the following sub- jects: “Poultry in Pennsylvania,” “Market Gardening,” and “Fruits of Pennsylvania.” The changing conditions in the agriculture of the State is direct- ing the attention of many of our farm people to subjects of this kind, and in each instance, a successful specialist in his particular line, whose premises were visited land whose operations were carefully scrutinized by the Head of the Department, was employed ‘to make the investigation and prepare a bulletin for the information of the public, giving the result of his investigation and his methods of operation. Other bulletins published during the year are “Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the State Board of Agriculture,” “Con- centrated Feeding Stuffs of Pennsylvania,” “List of Local Agricul- tural Fairs for 1906,” “Report of Bee-Keepers Association,” “Analy- sis of Commercial Fertilizers, Spring Samples for 1906,” “Farmers Institutes in Pennsylvania, 1906-1907,” “Proceedings of Spring Meeting of State Board of Agriculture and Farmers Normal Insti- tute,” and “Analysis of Fall Samples of Commercial Fertilizers.” For all these bulletins as well as all the bulletins issued by the Department from its organization to the present time, there is a great demand not only from the citizens of our own State, but from other states as well as foreign countries. It is a matter for regret that in the early years of the existence of the Department, before the value of these bulletins had become to be fully appreciated by the public, the number that could be legally published was entirely too small, so that the supply of many of them is quite, or nearly, exhausted, and yet the demand for them continues. With the in- creased number that may be published under the Act of 1903, the supply is still insufficient to meet the demand, and I would re- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 13 spectfully suggest the propriety of providing for the publication of a greater number of each new bulletin and the publication of new editions of such of the numbers that are exhausted, as in the judg- ment of the Secretary may be deemed proper. In order to comply with your expressed desire that the cost of public printing shall be kept as low as is at all consistent with the good of the public service, I have endeavored to make this personal report as brief as possible; and to meet the expressed view of the Attorney General’s Department, as to what may be lawfully in- cluded in this report, I have been obliged to leave out much import- ant matter that has heretofore appeared in the Annual Report of this Department. I regret that under the law, as it now is, I am unable to include with this report the entire proceedings of State Associations, organized for the advancement of the interests of agriculture in its several branches, and that I can only give abstracts of such proceedings. The essays read at Farmers’ Institutes contain much valuable information for farmers of the State, and it is only because I am informed that they cannot legally be published that they have been left out. I hope, however, to be able to preserve at least some of these by publishing them in bulletin form. The elimination of the matter referred to will diminish the size of the Report, as well as its value to the Agriculture of the State, but it is hoped that the saving to the Commonwealth in the item of printing, may in some measure compensate this loss. I wish, in conclusion, to express my appreciation of the assistance and counsel your Excellency has so cheerfully and promptly given me whenever called upon. I desire also in this public manner to acknowledge the help given by the agricultural as well as the public press of the State, by encouraging every attempt to attain better methods and secure more satisfactory results. I have the honor to be, Very truly yours, 77 eo Secretary of Agriculture. 14 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE DIVISION OF FARMERS’ INSTITUTES FOR THE YEAR 1905-6. Harrissure, Pa., Junuary 1, 1907. To the Honorable N. B. Critchfield, Secretary of Agriculture: Sir: I have the honor to present herewith the Twelfth Annual Report of the Division of Farmers’ Institutes. During the Institute year ending June 1, 1906, the institutes held in Pennsylvania have been more than usually successful. Increased attendance can only be ascribed to the growing interest of the farmers and the desire for a higher knowledge of the many import- ant lessons relating to the most approved meihods to be adopted, which are so essential in order to successfully engage in agricul- tural pursuits. When we remember that our institutes are held at a season of the year (in the winter) when heavy snows and severe storms prevail, the large attendance is the more remarkable, since the aged and infirm are on this account prevented from attending. Too much credit can not be given our corps of County Institute Chairmen, whose work is largely voluntary in its character. By their untiring efforts suitable places for holding meetings are pro- cured, programs prepared, local committees organized and all ar- rangements completed for holding the institutes. The entire work is completed on a basis of a sum not exceeding $12.50 per day for every day of institute held within a given county. Some changes have been made in the corps of Institute Lecturers. This is made necessary by the calls coming from other states for a number of our efficient lecturers, others by reason of age or business demands upon their time have been compelled to decline work; however, we are proud to say that our plan of encouraging persons to take part in the program as local institute instructors has developed an army of very satisfactory workers from which to fill our ranks from year to year as necessity would seem to demand. The demand for two-day meetings is on the increase. At all two- day meetings five sessions are held, educational topics are placed upon program for one of the evening sessions and the assistance that is freely rendered by most of the County Superintendents of the Public Schools is deserving of more than a passing mention. These leading educators are an important force in directing the attention of the farmers to the importance of the Centralized Town- ship Schools and Township High Schools, as in my judgment no one thing would so rapidly develop the strong, but in many in- stances latent faculties of our country children than the graded centralized school. In these schools lessons should be taught on Soil Building, Plant Growth, Animal Husbandry, Birds, Insects, etc., in fact the entire range of natural things, thus equipping the farmers’ children for a more efficient and intelligent direction of form operations and at the same time broadening and elevating the No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 16 standard of Agriculture. At the second evening session topics relat- ing to the Country Home are presented. Indeed what subject is fraught with greater possibilities to the State than that of the Farm Homes of Pennsylvania. Their sanitary conditions, surroundings, the social problems, such as make life in the country pleasant and desirable, for without well established country homes owned by the occupants and adorned by a queenly crowned mother surrounded with loving family circle, the State can not hope to long continue its imperial strength and greatness. The day sessions are devoted to practical and scientific questions relating to the Soils, their forma- tion, phy sical condition, productive possibilities, how to best grow the various farm crops and those best adapted to the different ‘soils and market demands; also the nature of Plant Life and Growth, its intricate lessons shown forth in leaf stalk and root. Possibly greater interest was developed the past season in Corn Breeding and Cultivation than in that of any other cereals. Lessons given in the selection of seed, manner of planting, cultivation and harvesting this golden crop have developed a determination among the farmers to grow a quality of corn better adapted to the requirements of the animals kept upon our farms. We are learning that by careful selection of seed, that expensive ingredients entering so largely into all our Feeding Stuffs, Protein, etc., can be increased many per cent. by planting seed having in its grains a well developed germ and con- taining a large proportion of protein, by discarding seed deficient inthe protein-content from year to year, the farmers can with cer- tainty expect to grow from the corn crop a feed approaching very near to a balanced ration for their animals. Indeed, as a result of Farmers’ Institute teaching, the Pennsylvania farmer is rapidly approaching the period when he will grow upon his farm the differ- ent nitrogen-gathering plants and legumes rich in protein, and corn ladened with an increased quantity of protein within its kernels to make a palatable and balanced ration for his animals, without hay- ing to resort to the most costly and sometimes dangerous method, that of purchasing the high priced and sometimes deleterious com- pounds placed on the market as animal foods. Our course of instruction would be incomplete unless attended by a competent corps of Dairy Instructors, since in no other line of animal industry is there so great an investment of capital or so many different problems to solve, embracing the dairy herd, breed and management, feed, care of milk, buiter making, the making of cheese, the demand for not only accurate teaching, but actual demon- stration in testing milk for its purity and actual butter fat-content, ripening of cream and complete process of churning, working the butter, marking, scoring and naming the points of excellence which it contains. Meetings of this kind wherever held have proved emin- ently useful te the dairyman and calls for such demonstrations are reaching us from many counties of the State. By this demonstra- tive method of instruction, we are rapidly weeding out the unpro- fitable dairy cow, the more profitable dairy herds in Pennsylvania yielding 350 lbs. of butter per year, whilst the poorer herds yield but little in excess of 150 lbs. per year, thus we note the margin of difference in vield is a wide one and the practical work of the Insti- tute Division is to eliminate from the dairy herd the profitless 150 Ibs. cow and place in her stead the 350 Ibs. cow. We are proud to 16 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. state that we stand a close second in the value of our Dairy Cows, the amount being $37,647,337. Pennsylvania is naturally a tree-growing State, indeed our great founder named in “Penn’s Woods.” This being true, special atten- tion is given to Horticulture and Pomology by reason of our favor- able soil conditions, abundance of moisture, suitable attitudes and unexcelled home markets. Special instruction is given in the selec- tion of a location, preparation of soil, selecting trees and varieties; their planting and care and marketing the fruit. I feel safe in say- ing that Pennsylvania is destined to be the leading apple growing state of the Union, because of her soil, climate and all favoring conditions prevailing within every county of the State. Not only so, but in no other line of operation is there a greater promise of large profits to the persons who adopt modern and approved methods in the management of their orchards. In fact the farmer of today who would bring success to his calling must, of necessity, bring to bear in his operations the light and truth which men of science have developed within ‘the last generation. He can no longer pursue wornout and unprofitable methods; he will discard the unprofitable dairy cow; keep on his farm pure bred stock of all kinds; be a grower of fruit for market and home consumption and bring to bear upon the community the highest order of intel- ligence in his farm work. The past year marked the high water mark in Institute work, in that there were held a greater number of institutes with increased interest manifested and attendance, 165,553, which is greater than any past year. Of the future we can only say that the demand for meetings more than double that we can supply with the funds pro- vided us. Our Annual Roundup was held at Clearfield on May 29- 31, proceedings of this meeting having been placed in bulletin form and has been widely distributed. These meetings are accomplishing much towards concentrating the work of our lecturers and crystaliz- ing their efforts upon the more important truths and advanced teach- ing in agricultural chemistry and botany, animal and plant breeding, seed selection, etc. When agriculture prospers, all other industries advance, when agriculture languishes, panic threatens all other com- mercial and manufacturing interests. Agriculture of today can only advance by intelligent directed effort; first, careful thought, after which working out that thought in actual farm work. The Farmers’ Institutes are working for the Pennsylvania farmer in a field oc- cupied by no other organization, conveying to him lessons intended to give strength and stability as a farmer and citizen. Program of this meeting is embraced in this report. The following is a complete outline of the institutes held during the past year, giving places where held, dates and number of ses- sions; also attendance by sessions, three State speakers attending all the meetings. These meetings were held at a cost of less than $40.00 per day, and challenge competition from any source when we remember that hall rent, programs, all local management, hotel and travelling expenses and per diem pay of all the State speakers is embraced in this statement: 17 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. No. 7. CIs ‘e ez9 ZL see enee $ ) ‘OT ‘OT “00 ‘O0L ‘oy g Zz See ee ene eee COL Choqefi? yooRodd ‘spBorw xX BIquinjop OSL Ors Z 4 ‘ect ‘00Z ‘SZL ‘OSE “OST ¢ Z DEDSCEUtGEs aE avy ju |peoor mc ccoucRUnGnS | e(ePleic:o) ee SIL essere | 9 ‘COL ‘ORL ‘OOL “OGL ‘06 3 z Sateeenee igeg. “Uwe |mernessee th -* STS RUT MENG G2P Gg ia g ‘OOL ‘OOL ‘0g “00L ‘ay, g Zz Se ‘5-8 ‘uBe aac gach aaa Dicriar OPP ‘T 882 4 & ‘OOP “OSE “0&8 “00% ‘OFT g G ER pa ok Gol amr ie Nee at eats Sar SITAsABy ST PES Sinan ss $015 ac GO) Galea) O6t ‘2 S18 £91 I z ‘052 ‘OST ‘O6T ‘OPT “S38 g z |) fie Des Oe SB eehtr oie rece iste ay eA ASRGOS) 02g ELT I z ‘ozs ‘OCT ‘08 ¢ I | seeeeee roth Ge) Ga Treresserees UIOpaaLT ISBE ecg TLL p £ ‘OOF ‘og ‘ose ‘OL ‘oe Gc | z tee tees ¥B-8% "qaqa Settee een enee SINQSULe ITA Peete eee eee eenee ‘Iyer cols 029 org I ; | ‘oce ‘oce ‘08 FA I [ppeeeereones: sd peer caia succor gree 7 * ‘al TTAsUyoW | ate SPL zZ ; 002 ‘OIZ ‘ee ¢ I peteneeechO ath cre fot: Soecuocab oak + f1a.071a8}9H 8s LIT a ¥ | *OSe “OZ “Se ‘Ost ‘o9 | z ooo = AP G=GGu Ole Wee shee ae ‘sinqsiei you geo LCL ins af | ‘008 ‘OOT ‘Og 08r ‘G9 g g DOSS eed KORVGE spartelee nemo LEO Le VNe cIg £91 Z | p “OOP ‘OOL ‘os 002 “09 G Zz AOCOOOOD ‘0Z-61 SCSUTa liek wae eu, ee ; uopus[d |ttttstes: niafels\ateiaya ‘syaog 8653 #80'T | 102 ra g | ‘08S “OST “S&T “89 “9% g Zz liek cine Peace gue Eo} tal ae ee ak een ae ‘£10. P0OM. 688 pe ae a & ‘0G ‘OIG {823 (88 ‘EL g Zz [Boise oreo OCH Lee <1 Sule ee anne eet OUT AULS LER cz) Ish l¢ ¢ ‘092 OST, 0g2 Sg P z ) Peovonad “LT-9T "dar lines (aera : dOLOYOSuBIL | eis sieisiciciaiesisicieisies ‘paojpag 166 8¥% 6h | 4 g | ‘08 “OF “16 ‘GL ‘92, g 4 [eects ‘Te-0¢ 99 acral mae aes UWION | 6S 611 P & | ‘gg ‘oeg ‘ST ‘OOT ‘89 g vA |Wecascrecheamee G Pees Lire ens CNT il | erases ie ets MOTAITO AT i | 0cT Hy oooonn } “oy, ‘oy, Zz T HpasraxereeveteTeteyerele 6 ‘09d, Reet es * uopsul1eg Perec ceeresesecee ‘leave £29 ‘S 012 ‘T GES 5p ee | ea ‘Ops ‘O9T ‘0S ‘OLT ‘06 |g | @ fea entse etnies ‘ST=LT BU eee uo WPI 966 661 CLOSET iets ‘OST ‘OFZ ‘601 ‘008 ‘28 Z (er pense sey Bpegre smes elton aa gts oO eT 962 8ZT z hee ‘OST ‘9 é F z Ney lle ai i Si UBL pes ee Sie ad ree _ PIBON TOE |) eka SpE h3 ‘OLE ‘OFS “622 ‘08% ‘ZL g | Z | Past rse VeEaTL meUeip | soon Oar eoe sae ROMO esos ol ot Oa ecn ys 9182 ye aes z | 3 1OPC 08h pa ve g es | COO Geet) neets cna ange Na ch

21D Hx OD st 1 Oo HOD ~ms owe SS 0 09 1 0 Ht ‘a9 ‘Gp “G3 ‘OP ‘061 09 O9T “38 ‘OSs ‘SP “Gh “OP GGL “G8 ‘See ‘SL ‘09 ‘SOL ieee ‘OST “GL “008 ‘OST ‘GgL GLI. ‘OOL ‘008 ‘STL ‘ORG ‘08S ‘OST ‘OST ‘OSE “096 “OST “O08 ‘Oz ‘0Se “083 “S83 ‘008 ‘O8T OCT “OUT “OSS “TZ “fT ‘8 ‘0@T ‘OT ‘PS ‘68 “GIT ‘LE “PE ‘GIL “SOL “FE “08 66a" S18) 88) “SL ‘9S ‘0G ‘SL ‘0G ‘GL ‘8h ‘ZS ‘Sb og ‘0S ‘OOP ‘O09 “a, “G9 ‘O08 ‘OS ‘ch ‘09 “O08 ‘os ‘08 ‘ch ‘OLT ‘OS 0S ‘9Z Che “08 #9 ‘Oh ‘SI ‘22 99, ‘SIE “82 ‘82 Sh) 06) shoe 18 ‘ogg “OTL : ‘O¥6 ‘O6T ‘00% ‘OS GB ‘OLE “008 ‘OLT 009, ‘one ‘see ‘008 “og ‘0S ‘OP “GCL ‘S3q ‘06 ‘SL ‘09 ‘ST O0L “SL ‘os ‘OS “002 ‘OS ‘008 ‘O0T “09 ‘00% ‘oe “008 ‘09 ‘003 "0OL ‘09z SOOT ‘08 0% ‘OOr 09 ‘09 ‘08 ‘98 ‘09 | ‘O6T ‘G6 ‘392 ‘OPT ‘cue “G2 ‘S13 ‘BI “GIS “GST ‘20h ‘002 “99T “OL “68T ‘98 ‘99 “Go “ger ‘08 ‘09% ‘82 “00% ‘002 ‘00F ‘008 | } ; ‘OS ‘“%& “00OL ‘092 “Oo! “06 “gS 2G BAD OD DAD AD LD HSE 3 HS 00 1 1D 09 UD HD 1919 0 BD 1D OF 09 LD LG 1918 D1 ID 09 1 OTD IDS HDD HD I 1D 69 10 09 09 OD NAAT NNNANNAH BANNAN PAN ANAAN AN BH NANNANNANNTARANNM ANNAN AAe ss 8g "+ 8g pial oi) 83-13 5 13-02 9g beseeees tga ge “ CGree "OG-16 cal “T8-08-63 ‘08-61 29 wees Quy Sgpiears Si8/aig gy DURHODEI cher ‘8-3 ‘T “G9Ht-18 eee eae e nae "AON “AON “AON ‘00d ‘00d ‘00d “ou “Qo og “Qo “qo ‘uve ‘ue ‘00d “03d ‘00d ‘09d ‘00d ‘09d “AON "AON ‘090d ‘00d ‘oad “Q9u1 “Co “QauT ‘00d ‘00d ‘00d ‘ue ‘wer ‘uvs ‘ues “Qu “Gat qa “8H “aT “ue ‘uve ‘0a, “09d “AON “AON "AON ‘uet “usr ‘uer ‘ue ‘uer "qu "QT ‘ues ‘aT Auosury doy, ‘JUNO! pied beteeeeeetees “CUOITBE “* “OTTTATOISHTVOTL terrereees 'QA0aD, AOUOHT “OITTASAOD OWL vee “SINQaallo ‘asIpeled “UMOJUUIB EL tereeteeee Come Ey ‘auly ~eseyound beeen Couerpul ‘uny uued “Mae SAIOTIIB AMA ‘UOIUQ, “JIN teeters “OTTTES ‘uosiJozjor ‘jadeyo ATOM ONES sree “OTTIASIAS0OUY “UOJIVT WO “SINGS |[PUUO DST saaicieas ) 6gTpTAaq ABT ‘SBULOYUL “3S BARE tresses “CUM OISITO ‘eB {SOUOLL *“AIOMIIFT 189M. “ALOMOLET, SBOL esmdin.o ning os Dray ‘ule]Bg MON ‘UdARTT MON “M@OFOTTTAL “AA ‘UeH yyuuuang veeeeeeeees OM OT AIT RUT “Ysvqr YON bereeeress (SpIggsByy ‘SAIBIN ‘2S ‘AOYSII_ ‘sanqsAdlag “‘UMO}SOLSULT ‘a[[TAp.z00u0p Peete sere rererneee | Carga ‘sulidg 91ppr ses DragUIetd “+ ‘aT[JAUOSyOBe “* ‘UMOPYOINO “UMOSASOFT ‘o[T}Aupoouly ‘UsV Yoel ‘AO[[BA SuyUoo0l_ stes “OTTTAINBeUUOD “OTTTASMBpy ' ‘KaTIBA dJoaAvag ** ‘aT[TAasuUBIO bene eeeesereeee TOTTTAT TTT Ce ites ‘BUUBMBYOR] eyerune ‘uoOSsIeyer ‘BueIpul ‘uopsurjuny Coot erect eens eee ‘aueed4 U0 ‘UlpyUeAY “YSed0y] ‘97}9AB4 ‘ulydned ‘IBMBTIG *puvlslequing ‘ploJMBIO \ ** “BIqUINn[OD: Off. Doe. ANNUAL REPORT CF THE 20 CGP ‘T 809 ‘% ol6 88S 'S ‘satqunoo Ag oF yoseseees 09g SIT 298 | OLT 00+ 003 00L OFL 00L | OFT StT | SL €T9 eer STs TOT Scé Bt) C&T cP C8L LST oo ‘T Ch 092 es 89 FE 009 006 GS 802 0S ‘T 0&6 090‘T Ie | $¥8'T 692 P8P 16 OSE OL oss OIL cet cr POL 'T FST Sés PPL 789 «= |:«L8T. 068 i) 069 bi OIL'S | 0L 00€ | 0ST 02S | O&T OOL‘T | 022 GOL =| TPL ch | StL 16 6F | 4 5 e 8 q om Y oq ® | | ‘20uepusiTV SHES 00 0D 09 SH GID OS 6D Seie . ay Samat et 3) SEA CS ree | 2 T Mateus |ovrretererees reversane €T¢'‘T SPO | Z9L see ¢ “002 ‘oy ‘O08 ‘oy p Pie, lic Goe eons ‘WG-1 Ble"ath | eoOGa nod sarees uOS[OUOIN SCF | GPL . * ¢ ‘Q2Z *CZT ‘QL g a see een ewee ‘0Z 09d leew wee ewe ee *S[[BuL a ae QO T | 2a saece fo: ‘O0F 008 ‘008 “00 - rae al GOCORAIG ‘6I-8I. BEYoi | CF esncectas . oecmaeuns Sie i Supulo‘ | etre wees e “2% ‘6 Z t ye Abana attess (2 aac |r ‘£419 0S ct) Lg g ‘9a) “IT “68)" ‘22 c Z ‘Tr “Oaqi=08 “AON |i sooo: * ‘fu JuesPalg 61 | 6 g ‘6L ; é Zz Tome, lip ccinssrosestis “ea "AON |Potteess nosso emeene ‘a]UoSVT a an th ie BF egy g T | ceseetreces "92 AON [Stoo tess ‘aanqsuse1p sieges aisle ‘puvjarouse 1 1 mPeBbooeroCGon . YR oOo ARO CEG a ‘UM0}2 00%) £9r | PSL p ‘oez ‘OGL ‘go | 4 T | crtrneseeees a Wap [Peres hens sees SOOM Cracio peers | clr | S&L 7 ‘O6L “OPT ‘os g L ecccerccnss . oi ‘ue | see eesereseses ‘yoor9 yooe, POE LOL b ‘CPL ‘GIL ‘FP £ tees Pa lG ze orons ‘og ac | Pere tere ewer eseerees ‘SUINIBO 228 WI p ‘CLT ‘QOL ‘op £ T cece nereee “62 SOC | eames eecewsie eee ‘OTT AAOIN e 3 > re | @ | Toys i” z Bi ; ; < 3 Sea Y |) sekcl sah c 5 ° eS bt » i | 8 ‘4 | 2 5g a iae| late a | 8 eakead eones — ° go | | | =» | & : | ‘SUOISSOg Aq 20UBpUa}}V a a ‘201d ‘AquNOD | | Niece e ayed | | | | ah fe | —| —| cere a | | lei | | ‘yuesorg | We 8 ‘sou BpUus}V | *penul}u0O—s06T-G06T AO NOSVUS—-SHLOALILISNI SUAWUVA VINVATIASNNGd No. fie DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 23 FARMERS’ ANNUAL NORMAL INSTITUTE. HELD AT CLEARFIELD, PA., MAY 28-31, 1906. PROGRAM First session convenes Tuesday Afternoon, May 29, 1906. J. W. NELSON, Shawville, Pa., Chairman. 4 Call to order 2.00. ™ Address of welcome, by Hon. Allison O. Smith, Clearfield, Pa., to which a response will be made by members of the convention. 1. “ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, CARE AND TREATMENT OF FARM ANI- MALS.” (40 minutes, and 20 minutes for questions.) Dr. E. E. Tower, Hop Bottom, Pa. 2. “THE COMMERCIAL ORCHARD AS A BUSINESS.” (30 minutes, and 20 minutes for questions.) aa Dr. J. H. Funk, Boyertown, Pa. Tuesday Evening, May 29, 1906. HON. JASON SEXTON, North Wales, Pa., Chairman. Call to order 7.30. 1. “GOOD SEED AND HOW TO OBTAIN IT; ADULTERATED SEED.’ (40 minutes, and 20 minutes for questions.) Prof. J. W. T. Duvel, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. 2. “DOMESTIC SCIENCE OF FARM HOMES.” (40 minutes, and 20 minutes for questions.) Mrs. T. HE. Orr, Beaver, Pa. 3. “ACCUMULATION OF SOIL NITROGEN.” (40 minutes, and 20 minutes for questions.) Prof. J. W. Harshberger, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. Wednesday Morning, May 30, 1906. J.S. BURNS, Imperial, Pa., Chairman. Call to order 9.00. 1. “WHAT CHEMISTRY IS DOING FOR THE FARM.” (40 minutes, and 20 minutes for questions.) Prof. Wm. G. Owens, Bucknell Uni- versity, Lewistown, Pa. 2. “SOIL IMPROVEMENT.” (50 minutes, and 30 minutes for questions.) Prof. W. F. Massey, editor, The Prac- tical Farmer, Philadelphia, Pa. 24 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. Wednesday Afternoon, May 30, 1906. A. P. YOUNG, Millville, Pa., Chairman. Call to order 1.30.. 1. “ROUND-UP SESSION DEVOTED TO MATTERS RELATING TO LOCAL INSTITUTE MANAGEMEN, AND A GENERAL OUTLINE OF THE WORK FOR THE COMING SEASON.” (40 minutes.) Discussion opened by A. L. Martin, Director of Institutes. Note.—This address to be followed by general conference, and five minutes talks from County Chairman and Institute Lectures. Wednesday Evening, May 30, 1906. T. E. ORR, Beaver, Pa., Chairman. Call 'to order 7.30. 1. “MEMORIAL DAY.” (30 minutes.) Mrs. M. A. Wallace, Ellwood City, Pa. 2. “THE BREEDING OF POULTRY FOR EGG PRODUCTION; HOUSING, CARE AND MANAGEMENT.” (illustrated by lantern slides.) (One hour, and 80 minutes for questions.) Prof. James E. Rice, in Charge of Poultry Husbandry, Cornell Univer- sity, Ithaca, N. Y. 3. “BEE KEEPING.” (lliustrated by lantern slides.) (40 minutes, and 20 min- utes for questions.) Prof. H. A. Surface, Economic Zoologist, Harrisburg, Pa. Thursday Morning, May 31, 1906. J. NEWTON GLOVER, Vicksburg, Pa., Chairman. Call to order 9.00. 1. “ON WHAT DO THE DAIRY PROFITS DEPEND.” (40 minutes, and 20 minutes for questions.) Prof. H. E. Van Norman, Department of Dairy Husbandry, State College. 2. “FEED, BREED AND CARE OF THE DAIRY.” (49 minutes, and 20 minutes for questions.) Dr. J. D. Detrich, West Chester, Pa. 3. “THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE DAIRY AND FOOD LAWS.” (40 min- utes, and 20 minutes for questions.) Dr. B. H. Warren, Dairy and Food Commissioner, Harrisburg, Pa. Thursday Afternoon, May 31, 1906. I, A. ESCHBACH, Milton, Pa., Chairman. Call to order 1.30. 1. “SOIL IMPROVEMENT WITHOUT STABLE MANURES.” (40 minutes, and 20 minutes for questions.) Prof. R. L. Watts, Scalp Level, Pa. 2 “ECONOMY IN BEEF PRODUCTION.” (40 minutes, and 20 minutes for questions.) Prof. T. I. Mairs, State College, Pa. male LIST OF COUNTY INSTITUTE MANAGERS FOR DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. SEASON OF 1905-6. County. Name and Address of Chairman. DAM EMAVISS 0s aietele/al's\<] rie ne bie cie Ww. H. Brosius, Drumore. TUAIWTENCE, 2. soe ee ee eee eee we ccs Samuel McCreary, Volant, R. F. D. UPTV OM ste oer ove) o alee ielisisislarevolainiere Hdwin Shuey, Lickdale. Lehigh, ......---.+ssseeeeeeree P. S. Fenstermaker, Allentown. LUZeErne, ..--..-- ee ee eee reer eee J. FE. Hildebrant, Dallas, R. F. D. No. 2. Lycoming, ...--.----+e+ssseesek A. J. Kahler, Hughesville. = INNGIRCGATUN vas clelele semis ere /cieisis ome" erie L. W. Howden, Coryville. WIeieeies | Gop eb oe ab COGS OOo OUOOaD W. C. Black, Mercer. Whitin. gocensnpoobo cody cop UD OGG M. M. Naginey, Milroy. MLONTOE, ..-- cere cceree rs srrrcnce Randall Bisbing, East Stroudsburg. Montgomery, ...--s-seeeere eres Jason Sexton, North Wales. MOONtOur, ..ccccreeececescscecce Cc. A. Wagner, Ottawa. Northampton, .......--+-s+++-- Wm. F. Beck, Easton, R. F. D. No. 1. Northumberland, .......----+> T. A. Eschbach, Milton, R. F. D. No. 1. IEEE, | Soopdopo nese ceca oUOUOO Sac A. T. Holman, Millerstown. Philadelphia, .....-+++++++++++ Edwin Lonsdale, Girard College, Phila. J. B. Kirkbride, Bustleton. THIKe, nonceonecupocpy cede cogouD dad B. F: Killam, Paupack. « Potter, .....66- secs sccerscccce Horace H. Hall, Ellisburg. Schuylkill, ........--2cseceee-s W. H. Stout, Pinegrove. Siniyeley Gopeoddocsoncodecmanom™ Charles Miller, Salem Stormer bocuau coopeuanenno DOI Jacob §S. Miller, Friedens. Sullivan, ......--ssceecceeeceeen J. K. Bird, Dushore, R. F. D. No. 3. Susquehanna, ......+++.-seeeee Dr. E. E. Tower, Hop Bottom. ADCS Apo apo Ou nd SOOOUT OOO OOC RK. E. Field, Wellsboro. NOTALO ere cletatele.cle loins cir) «ielnaicisiele.cisi0 J. Nelson Glover, Vicksburg. Wheinehm=(0:-5 Inj oGon ono COBOOOUUbOOS Ww. A. Crawford, Cooperstown. ViVGlanenlg co oninepdoc SouOOO boon GoD George A. Woodside, Sugargrove. Washington, .......cs.esseeeee D. S. Taylor, Raccoon. DVVEIyAT Getiteicie O00F 00 ¢8 | 00 OST 00 0°r | 000T | 004 | 99 69 88 Gg SL 80 LO #0 co Ge “| 008 00 $8 | 00 O9L 00 S&T 00 FT | 0S OL | 09 09 OF 09 9) W 90 0 90 00 9 00 00 0% | 00 SLT 00 09T 00 St | 00 Zr | ga 69 OF 09 9) 10 | 90 #0 90 GL & 00S | 00 SF | 00 O9T 00 S&T 00 § 0S OL | 09 | 09 OF 03 ), 80 0$ | 90 0$ | F008 | 0 0$ | 09 #$ OS #$ | 00 SEs | 00 osts 00 O81$ 0S OTs | 09 6S = OL OF =| 09 os | se os | 0s o$ | oz 0$ | ! | = n n n fl re Q Z (e) Q s Sal Ree toda Ge Meanie ee im Ei | tes | AAR eliotn | ee = = io 3 3 3 P| = 5 te a ie) © os | ley > ® a a ue a ie nn a - . a ‘ : @ jo] 2 A a 7 an o eo) 4 cr oA a So a & & © F y ° al - in i i} | J ft <4 i) 5 4 © ° a g 4 4 © 4 ° o ct B = o 9 4 po 9 g > a ; 4 1) ic) be OQ © ay 09 i) I = SUE pale A at eg ° % 3 3 5 : @ 5 4 A eg As cS) S € § 8 3 5 Hitlist = E =} ie “HOO SAPT “AO “BL Vale 4q peelop §«= “saFJUNED Aq ‘aINn|Nosy Jo Arejeioeg Ayndeq ‘UIIFW "I “WV ‘pl0IMBID * “erquinjtoo tees “oqUITD 9) )042-) Fe) rie = SIOTLLE To ‘194seyOD °s fam,098D * “woqisD ‘U0IaULB,:) ‘eBlIquieg terres “aN ‘syong ‘plojpeig teteeerens Crp ‘syied ‘plospod ‘laABIG ‘Su0IISULLY ‘AUS SIV ‘SUBPY “sa;uN0D ‘elueA[AsuUeg Ul ‘prvog pur seSeM WIRA UM ‘HIG SAP]T pus sJONpOIg ULE, JO sedJIq BUIATH ‘906T HOH LHOGHU JTOUD 67 10 of 02 FS | ST #$ | 00 Bes | 00 SeTs | 00 SHTS | 03 €1$ | 00 IIs EIU eA fal oo aaa Slat UCHR RL AML AULT CYS SS ee ———_t Se | i ee cas + 80 reseresetesseeeeel Oo OF | 00 SLT | 00091 | 008L | 096 gg GL Se SFiS eee Gy 009 | 00% | 00S | 00 0ST | 00 0ST | 00 SE | 00 OF | 09 06 "ee “BupWOA 00g j7"'"""/ 0008 | 00 09T | OO Ost | OOFT | 00 cr | | 09 | Sh coe eee ew 00S (00% | 0098 |*""""""*| 00 OFE | 00 SE | 00 OF ci anes ob vRSts Ory SRAM 09& | OFF | 000F | OO OST | OOOST | OO FT | 00 TI og | OL “rt uopsUTYyse MA 00% | SLE | 0008 |"*":"'''''| 00 OFT | 00 cE | 006 go} 8 verrssses | Sua tae MA - | L0 | og | 00% | 0008 |**""""*"*| 00 OFE | 00 cE | 006 /.09 2g osuBue A HE | 80 | 009 09% | 0098 | 00 Oct | 0008 | 00ZE 00 OF | gg ge | og 0s rrests mora oo | 90 oo’ | 00% | 008% | 002i | 00 OOT | HOOT 008 ¢9 i 00 T ritesesesess | @SOnL >’ | 20 00% | 00% | 0008 |**"*"''''| 00 SE | OOTE | 098 gg op OB kee Same wuueyenbsng Ex | 90 009 | 098 | 0098 |"-*""""*"| 00 OST | 00 2 | 00 OF 09 ob 09 06 trrreesss| UBATTINS | 90 00% | 00% | 0088 | OO OST | 00 S3E | OO EE — 00 OF ce) OF 09 Gh nirttttt Gassaulog | 0 | 003 (00% | 00 oo edt | 0009 | 00 8E | 00 OF ag OF 0g SL rrrsresees ‘Japéug > | 80 PO LA Aa 00 OSE | 00 OST | 00 8E 00 FT 09 se | (09 o), oe ees m= | 80 | 09% | 00% | 00 00 0ST | 0005 | 002 008 | 08 OF | 08 aulsoo tr oy Sree sere Cel «| 40 os% | OF | 00 00 OSE | 00 08f | 009% | 00 #1 OL OF 09 06 SSE AG SS een a eae laaceesren srs iGy Gel ODED © (C00 08. | 00VBD 1 i00:FE< 1°" 7" **"") 80 oh 9g 26 vet “erydjeperdd ee |e0 } 009 | 09% | 00 00 941 | 000FT | 0OTL 008 | 08 09 ge | 08 01 ie Does eae rm) 00g 09% 00 00 08f 00 FL 00 0r | ag 09 ge 6g SL purpiequiny}ION & | 0 00g | 00% | 00 00 SE | 009T 00 ZL | 99 a9 OF 09 08 “* ‘uojdureyoN Oo | 00S 00% | 00 00 OE | OF Zt 00 OT | gg gq og 0g 08 nreseress {M07 U0WL w 00g 0% 00 00 09t | 0008 | 00S OOZE “*""""*") 09 0F ag 0) “tt (SI9UL0S UO | 009 009 | 0 00 09E | 000SE 00ST 00 ZI 99 Ov 09 g8 treet ‘@0TUOHL +90 ose OOF 00 00 0FE | 00S2r | 00ST O0GE j***"**** gg 08 0g QL ttt UT HAL fj | 90 oo OSF | 00S8 | OOSLT | OOSZT | OOZE OO OT | OS 09 og 0g 08 nirtt | TaodaT = | (90 00% OOF 0008 [**''t"t} 00 00L | 00GE 00 OT | O91 0g OF 09 03 vite wea [1G 80 i ee 00 08 wenn wees 00 OST 00 ¢ 00 ral fess . eg OP ee G), oo Supw0oAT Be | 789 09 009 | 000F | 90G2t | 0009F 009f 00 FF | o9l <9 OF 09 98 ttt ‘gusoznrT ce | 80 seteneceiersstees) 00 OF | 00 GLE | 00 09T | 00 ST | 00 Zr | Og a9 OF 39 g usual < | 90 00S | 09% | 00S | 00ST | OOF | ODOT OSE |*"****"") Gg OF gq SL "tt ‘uouegeT Oo | 90 00F OFF 000F OOSLE | OOSEE OOFT 00 SE 09 OF 09 08 ‘qouaIMYT | 90° oo OOF | 000F | 0008L | OOSEE | COST COZ | "| 99 ov | sg GL ‘+ ‘daqsvouery Qo |s 09 O00F | 000F 00 SL 00 0st | 00%T | OOTT | S93 | 09 oy 09 00 T BuUueMeyourTy 90 00F OS '| 0098 C0 0ST | 0OSEE | ODOT 008 | 09 ¥ | 09 Ge og | ; : trees “eyerune wo 09% | Off | 0068 OO SLE | 000IT | OOFT 00eT | OS 09 | «OF 03 ara nies eS STs TS CC ane ae 10 009 | 09% | 0098 00 OFF | OOOFL | OOIT | 006 | of | 09 - | OF | 0g OL veces Ceuerpul 80 109% | 098 | 008% OO S2r | 00S2E | OOZT | OOOT | OF | Oo | 08 | 09 OL _, uopsununty 90 |00% | 008 | 0098 | OO09t | 00 0ST | OOSE | OOO |"; OL | OF | sg 99 trrrtt “guar 10 | 00% | 08% | 0008 | 0008E | OOSet | OO Zt O00T | 05 | 09 a nrrees OTN 10 | 009 | 09% | 0098 | 000ST | 0009 | OOZE | 006 .\""**""") 9G | 08 | o2 | gb fees UypTU eT L0 oo | 008 | 0098 O00 G1T | 00 0ST | 00ST | 00 8T | Se o9 | | & Sh | 08 | 38210 ny 009 | 00% | O00F | 00 09T | 00 O9T | 00 LT | OO FT | 09 a 09 OL eas JoyeAB ) 02% | 00% | 0098 | 00 09 | OO SE | 00.Z~ | 00 Or | 08 09 Ob 9g gy TRI abet setts OMtGgr 80 00% | 08& | o00F j"7"'*"| 00 act | 09 9T | 00 HT | 02 ob | 09 99 95 pee meee §IA ~ | 60 009 | 002 | 0059 | 9 St | 00 Get | OO ST | OO ST fr) ****| OL 0b gq gL ‘it fereazped - | 80 029 | 08% | 000F | 00 09t | 00 O8t | OO FT | 00 ar | $8 9g 88 og 08 1. ‘urqdaed ‘ S 7 00s (03% |o0s | 00st | oo Or | 00 Ft | OOOT (**'***"! O8 98 09 OL Puvpiequind 7 , ae i i a i eee ed ek a i .— ’ a. oe. _— — Off. Doc. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE 68 90 os tT | 0& 16 09 OT or ) 10 90 COne ee 09 vag 81 10 or 2 | OF og Cy 6) 60 | 60 10 Dik peBeepeus | 06 ¥L SI 904 00 T 8@ $6 09 | 80 G0 G0 | 80 09 cot | SF OL él 90 03 T &% a 4S] | 90 90 SO | 80 GL cS T. cy oT cT 90 06 1 93 rad 0g | OT OL 60 80 00 T 0g T OF ae cT 90 eed a i 36 09 | 80 90 10 een” [MOUNT Gz T Og OL ss} 90 0S T 83 G6 gg | 80 80 | 80 60 oT tT ST cP OT oT LO 0S 08 cS 0) 60 60 | OL OT COL 0raL os TL LT SO SZ T 8% 06 09 OL 90 | 0 80 CONE OOSE 0g OL oT 90 OF T 0& GG gs OT 80 | LO | OF OF ost | 09 $1 cr 90 og T vas 06 0g 50 80 | 80 | 80 gL 0S T OF OL tL 90 Tk Bes 8@ co 09 60 80 90 | 90 00 T 00 T cL eT LT 10 aie AILS GS Sg as or 80 (1) aid, ba a se") G8 GL rae LT 90 0S @ 83 ¢ $9 Or or | OL | OT 06 003 | 09 6L 81 90 Seer as &% g¢ OL 90 | 80 | $0 Scuk |; Ogs. 0g Kas 9T 0 Get | 6 0S GL OL Ot | OL | 90 0S Cea estes I PL GO 0OOT | 83 ¥G 0g | 80 90 80 | SO ¢9 | 06 | SF OT FL 90 Gt | 9% 6% 0s | SO C0 80 80 08 0S T cP or 8T 90 OL T | 8 3 g9 | LO 90 40 10 gh GT cg OL cT 90 09 T 8@ GG 0g | SO c0 90 i) edie sat deal lee sell, OL ST 90 0s T 8Z rd i) ot or or | OL | OFT GT c9 &T 8T 10 og tT | 92 ¥G 09 | 80 60 80 | 80 OL T GL | Sg TL 9T 90 Oo T | & 9% 09 Or LO 80 | OT OF T 00 @ cL vas ST £0 0$ | 08 0o$ | Zz 0$ | 03 of | gS O$ | 20 og | G0 0$ | 90 0$ | 90 0$ | sh 0$ | 09 of | 09 0$ | OL O$ | FT OS 1 ta loa) lon) Q see le ee, Wesel ee a lemee | ee eg ea ae eels le cae 8 5 ay FF Fe Ps ¢ ey a 8 f 5 2 3 3 3. 6. ig) 5 el : f @ @ EF iB ie 5 5 a 5 > ea ra S 8 : g 5 S o o re in ‘ > th a ® x to) a] a a (5 g vo) io a n Ss] =] =| 3 i ic} ct [= 3 3 2 ee 4 > 3 al 5 # ue ® i 4 2 }° ® & ° eR © © 3 I g 3 c 5 = 5 4 cs) i @ Ge) 3 5 A © 4 is a 3 St ° th 3 3 Cima eas ‘ 5 2 o 5 < 4 c : N is) ° 9 ce] oS S = o Ish 2 a i=) © ® r=] SI icy o S| 2 3 n c ae ol n 3 ho] 5 4 . 5 3 = 4 SS i=] 4 > n n i) O a © 3 a or a © Ge © =e © a : a ro) = . : = 2 rel bal S = ©, ic} ‘ oD S| S 9 o & ra] : C=) ; = fe} 2 2 + : e & S ® aed co ie) n + o = 5 Ce 2 3 o Ss 3 i 5 4 ‘ : 2 | a: i ‘ 5 : * au a = b OIG ‘WMA ‘selqzzes30A "HOOYS PAT SOOOOOOOEED tice ‘Q1eMBlOd minieteintetais sist ‘urydned selsie POORHOOUNGCOIRS ‘puepzequind seers DIOTM BIO ‘* *BIQuIn[oD vere “UORUITD ‘PIeuseolD ROE ho Coy 42} 3) ees (ga}say tees ‘'Qaquay sss “HOGIBD * Mo1aUleD * “eLIquieD Bon8 tere “Goayng Nero ad OOONOD UC dnc Ons seeeees (gyongy 20 sees ‘prosper eee eee ‘Irelg sree ‘syed ** “ployped eee Jone ‘Zuo01suLy ‘Ausy.sallV sess ‘SUIBDW “soTjuNOD ‘ponuyju0o—906T UO LHOdHU dOUD DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. | { | | | 8L Of “%o8 90 0 | os 18 | uz 0f | ez ot | 09 of | go 0$ | 20 08 | 200¢ | 2008 | 06 $8 | OUTS, | Sa08) las” | or Of |) * See seeeeeeniee ce seeGerenenty, here OW memiiadOee RCs ine Nee tee 4s0% | 10 80 9 |c |o. | set | o9 or or Bp pe ase (says poses Oe | 11/00 OPE eigen lever eco 80 10 86 | 8 «=| OT «| OT | 08 ar oI vers SUTULOA AA [zeae hog Lee Wesco lpn Go aioe veledr ie 60 | 8 | 0or | oor | 99 I OL ‘pure [oto }se MA WUGOCOLBG) 90 | Ge I GZ | 08 | @g | Or 80 ony jaessceicasist2 ey Pecasoaoa wie Il 91 sieleieieieisial STATE IAAL Seu ue ogies rls, (unoun’ bg poke Sasi IE 10 S00 g GOee 00 caer aL Or a1 CELL CLING 9% | (90 ZT | 92 wz =| 08 80 ZO) |cB0ee REO | Veale =e dbnre a lhcy, Or er SCC | ¥ hoi Ve] ORR G gt bad 9 86 | 0 8 lOoe 20. (|g oor | %& 60 oL nreses ‘oguBUeA hes aa aOcauecOmeme | OMT. || ya 0 =| 0S 0 9 =| «90 0 | OL oor | & or #I eeaiaeed | Smor ia) g Cer ac0Gee noir eee keen el 08 10 90 80 co | (06 oOL OF 60 ai esos) aS ONT, HRSG cy ena srt | 9% Fd cg 80 ih 80 BO ge OO Ee dee a0 OL a ‘euuvyonbsng 41 08 Gomer exe a e109, | 80 90 10 | 0 GD oot OF g0 | SL vereess AUBATTING Ree a 90 | ser | 9 0 | 09° | 20 0 0 | 80 GL a 08 ge at nos Gastaulog | a Bee ego | NOL te |] ite wz | 09 Ww | 80 90 On ame ton OT | oF | 60 ra tresses | GapAug) REET Gy 5 tee ite cad °9 OL 90 90 0 aT | o9t | 09 | or | st moss STpyAnyos leeaeeee ae? slieag oot | 8 & OF 10 90 8080 068 08 op =| 60) | HL esa sidt) ASHI OE Ceres rea: elleOdup oy me, N20) 60 80 90 L0 GD oor | 9) = | OF WI Sse tas che Sear ED elererarai’ "| 28 | 10° AA AGALICC e 92 06 Po sieieeicin lenin seine eeeeey se Ssisevciee sanaisicee: Secereee: OF ra | ST a wiydepelyd ‘Te | 90 oor | zz 02 09 80 10 90 80 a) CL 0s me or ee ae a Ae ‘| gz | 90 Ost | 92 1 ag €0 80 80 80 GL Oe |n0tems wlechee||-an puvprequmny oN “| 08 OO era alt ceiieis | &% 09 60 g | 60 | 80 aL 001 08 ar | OT uo; duzey}ION “| 98 90 eT | $2 &% Gg OL 60 80 | 90 oor | Ser | 08 or | OF “* ‘10} UO, SASSO BT as a oot | 8% cg OL 30 | 20 80 09 Cop or che = Fi gT ‘£19003 UO, nomal ag O05. An eesce sy ng & | gg 80 80 90 £0 08 OL 0g or | & vos QOTUOTL esse eg Oh) | cent iag 2a 09 80 90 90 <0 OT | OT | 09 80 ai vos) TTDI, Poel iog 90. | Gz 02) | 0g 80 80 80 im ost | 09 oF =| 60 | #1 tet §te019TH1 <0 | 9 8% 0g 80 @ =| $0 90 Cowie isco tc rage OL #1 ve “UBa STON 90 | | 92 G -|.400 80 60 60 80 OO Dea ess sage lor 91 "+ (SurwooArT qo | 82 @% | OL rat 60 6 =| 20 St | OFT | OL dive alec ros ‘guaezny so | 9% ze | (99 0 10 90 | 80 % | 00r | 0g aL OL ces ystyerT <0 08 | 9% 09 10 80 | 90 90 09 «= | OOT | 09 ia or “ uoueqarT 90 | 93 0% g 80 90 10 w | Sb q, | 09 at a " ‘gouaIWerT 90. | & 0g ss | (90 90 SOme idee ney oor | 09 OL ¥L “+ §taysvouey 90 o | <9 ar 80 G0 Se OE | erik. 08 gt or BUUEMEOVT so % | so | 10 @0 Ole | 907 one ok in09 OL er coe Carerunp 10 1B @% ag | OT G0 60 or |r | 2 | og rai LI “* uosTayeL 90 |} os | &% og | 20 10 9 |90 |orr | ost | se Or ST vt ‘euRrpur Ca sae la 03 gg | (OF 80 or or OOT | 9% | 09 60 ras uopsurjunH 90 OFZ | & 0z og | OF 10 10 60 | OT | OOT | 08 OL gL sort ‘gusedy) Gi dere Slee 0% 0g 90 “0 *0 60 i) ch 0F Or gI seseseee | CHOU @0 OLT | &% 0% og 90 90 wo 90 GL a, | OF cai 9 fees UPC BAT <0 00% | 8% id og OL 90 80 80 &I | 00% | 09 w sr svete *_ SAeMTOpe Lo 02% | 08 8 om) 60 80 80 or ort | ost | Sb ¥L ST tresses 9qQahBt 90 oz | 8 ¥) =| 09 80 w 80 90 oot |o9 | og OL oT Pos a1SGE es. ° Off. Doe. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE 70 ESSE eee ‘ponuyju0N—90éT UO LHOdHU dOUO 0S & ee) as 00 008 «=§| OST T 00 0% 00 002 00 99 00 08 Sisco) TIT OTBGOL 003 09 T | 0008 Os T | Sot 00 9T 00 O8T 00 0g OGG beat ent een eran ae ies oT oe Gone Side eine iar as eo 2 a ‘pueliaquing 0S 3 GL T | 00 00S | OST 00 T 00 02 00 O8T 0093 | 00 oF ster MIOTMBID 00 3% 0s 00 0&6 | OFT a 00 ST | 00 O8T 00 93 {as(ivete "iumears segues elles elem ee eae vec ee ‘+ *erquIN[OO 00 Z og - 00 002 «=| «S3T 00 T 00 ST , 00 O8L 00 08 | 00 0S COD OSOEIILA 3 (0th 044 £9) 0S Z gL T 00 008 «| OG T 00 T 00 92 00 0&2 0093 | 00 OF ‘pleyleslD 00 & SLT 00 0F =| «OST 00 T 00 02 00 002 00 08 00 OF <=) WORUBTS) 00 00 @ 00 0f = =6OS T | oot 00 02 00 912 00 Og 00 $9 ‘19]s9U) 00 Z os T | 00 0F% | ST 00 T 00 02 00 O38 00 OF 00 ¢¢ SOOEELED oh Tyo) 00 € 00 @ 00008 | OST | 00 T 00 SZ 00 002 00 SF | 00 $9 ‘uoqaeD 00 & 00 @ 00 098 | os T Ort 00 92 00 083 00 02 00 S& ‘uo19UIeD 00 $ gL T | 00.098 | 09 T g@ T 00 S& 00 Ore 00 S& 00 09 “SBLIQUIeD og & 02 | 00 098 | OS T GT 00 92 00 OF6 00 0& C10) eel eee ais OPI TR SOIR 2S 4S Saha Oe ee he eal ee eR am rae SS ‘lang 00 € GLI | 00 098 | 0g T GZ T 00 06 | 00 00% 00 gg 00 $8 ‘syond 0g @ os Tt | 00 ose «=| «OFT | 0OT 00 & 00 91% 00 $2 00 OF ‘proj peig 0S Z 00 @ 00 0S | SLT GT 00 2% | 00 002 00 SF OOEO0 es NOP cae ee Geen IMEC tec aati reer MO StR daichii ee eon Ce Ser eae a ‘IUIVIG 00 & Sot 00 OF gc T 00 T 00 06 | 00 O8T 00 OF CC ale | ei I ee oe oe ae eee ae ean | careers al [ys SIRI] |e eer ae uns pe RL eee Che le ‘soe 00 & 09 T 00 09% | 0g T 00 T 00 93 | 00 O8T 00 08 | 00 0F ‘paoypad 00 & gL T 00 008 =| OFT ort 00S | 00 09% 00 0 «| 0009 | s8.0$ | 82 08 | 08 g RS IES (emg Eoin oa a ae Ra Oe ‘aABag 09% 0c T 00 012 oo T 00 T 00 02 00 002 00 08 | 00 SF aneosne SicsGassoul nscuornal kaortace reese ‘Suoasulty 0S € 00 @ 00 098 og T 00 T 09 &@ | 00 0&2 00 Ss {ROD MG Te Bellic tees alt eee : 8 & vé ‘Aus Sally 00 2$ 0g T$ 00 og2$ | 62 1$ 00 T$ 00 8I$ | 00 OST$ OOUSSS Sr |OONSES yu |hes ncaa G7T OS GCL OS eG O Stet eon Oise | macemacaiacieen nie eect man ‘SULEDY ae = i) {op] lJ = = eae os 4 Z g 3 B 5 Cees sles ole weer lamer of 4 5 5 @ us} =} 5 roy 7 9 ° Do 4 2 a a « a A a9 Ooh (ea = 3 > a) o oO i) is) 5 o iJ ° | = = Ss r= S s as bay K 2 o i) oQ < 3 3 e) % ~ - 5 4 o tn) c oe c a 3 . : i) la 3 ‘ 4 5 2 c B 4 I 8 4 real 4 F mn | 4 Bicoaralte ss : Ss 5 g = a | 2B B Belen ere 2 ©, ey 4 5. = Bt as | 2 2 a ay oe) < =" & Bt a o a | g n Q ame : S a FS) 5 | lees . aes : c ° o oh ° to 3 | a) =| ° b =) a | . ic) + i) & a | | fe 3 4 5 i ' sotjanogD Fe] log ie | | o 8 | & 5 | | ee | | saad | | = | | | | ae Ee ee Ee ‘3100 “soZBAA WIB ded an[eA *[OOM. ‘puey wIby B o DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. SSSSSSSBSRSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSERESSSSESRSSSELSESSES HOD ODD CDCI ICI AT CI 1 OH HD OIA A NA NANAN MANIA OCI MNANAIANAANANANIMAA oow oooce SSSESSRBSRES ANANNNA NAA nie No. 7. Nl | | | | 00 008s | OF TS | or T$ 00 02s | 00 O1Z$ 00 OF$ 00 098 bE 0$ | OF OF | ZB 0S | 9% 0$ | OB LOS SSC 0S el cone pest “nate mite we COs Bowe 00 0&8 OFT | 00 T | 00 02 00 O12 00 82% | 00 cy Pb te armen ds ce rn Se ‘yHI0OX 00 008 =| OS T 9% T 00 &% 00 002 | 00 08 00 oF Sessa wenn SUT ULOAAN 00 0¢& 0s T | ST | 00 &@ | 00 OFZ 00 SF 00 08 : vests DUBTAIOUIISA AA ooo | ost | st | 009% | o0w~ | 0003 | O48 | DOCU SGOu Aan ae ei “ees (QUABAL 00008 | 09T | ST 009% =| 00 OF | CDOS =|: OD SL Ser ok cee ea ant ell SRS ar eked Renae ‘itt “uO SUIYSB MA 00 028 «| «OST 00 T 00 02 00 OFZ 90 02 00 &8 30K beet see ee eee cease eee |i seteeereeee UrQGIe AA, 00 008 =| OST | 00 T 00 02 00 OFZ 00 06 00 0& | | ¢ : poe ‘osuBuo, 00 086 «=| Set 00 T 00 ST 00 09T 00 0S 00 08 it peo scores BERR ZOD SSE ONS th ovoy aden. 00 008 $@ T 00 T 00 02 00 Sé 00 02 00 S& Pape OR” 2 SieOar Mae AP OG Eas |e be lee ea nereieeieea SES Sa se See Olly 00096 «=| OST G6 I 00 8T 00 006 00 06 00 0& — ‘ ate stress “Buusyenbsng 00 098 =| OST 96 T 00 06 00 0&6 00 Sé 00 0S eR Soo wes 00 0S8 0s T 93 T 00 08 00 096 00 Sé 00 0S "Tt Qasraulog 00 008 = =§=6SaT 00 T 00 9T 00 006 00 Sh 00 08 svete ‘qepaus) 00 $22 «|| St T 00 T 00 9T 00 002 00 OF 00 0S ‘TIPUAnYoS 00 098 os T 93 T 00 S3 00 OF 00 92 00 OF set *199}}0d 00 096 so T 00 T 00 8 _ 00 006 00 S@ 00 OF 2 oe en eel ke 00 088 cL r 93 T 00 93 00 083 00 OL CU Ee, ees “* “erydieperyd 00 0&6 ST 00 T 00 9T 00 S/T 00 S& 00 09 A etE TS ele taots s) © ‘AIL 00 008 0s T G¢ T 00 02 00 006 00 S& 00 09 puslrequinyj10N 00 Sc8 =| OO T 00 T 00 8 00 00 00 OF 00 $S veeeees “Uo dUIBYLON 00 0&% SZ T 00T 00 81 00 O8T 00 ¢ 00 Sh weeeereeeses fINOUOW 00 008 0g T Ge T 00 S@ 00 006 00 OF 00 OL Treeseees “SI9ULOS}UOTL 00 008 0g T 00 T | 00 $2 00 002 00 9% 00 OF ee eee SOLLOTN 00 08 os T 00 T 00 02 00 008 00 3S 00 SL Ei by eet SUDA 00 008 os T 00 T 00 02 00 00% 00 08 00 0F ee i ee ee “* fa018 00 OFZ Ov T 00 T 00 8 00 SLT) | 00 08 00 SP : say tS ke See: ‘UBdsTOW 00 0¢6 9 T 00 T 00 02 00 002 00 0S 00 09 ‘SULWOOATT 00 00 os T 00 T 00 02 00 O8T 00 SZ 00 SP MERE AMAL 00 Sze sot 00 T 00 8T 00 O1@ 00 SP 00 OL Gp ystyet 00 098 og T 93 T 00 &% 00 00¢ 00 SF 00 $6 uouendqeT 00 008 =| OST | ST 00 0% 00 002 00 OF | 00 09 {20U2IMBT 00 098 os Tt | ST 00 02 00 OFZ 00 06 00 S2t GE “So sto SBOE 00 098 og Tt 2 T 00 02 00 OF% 00 S | 00 t ake COB ESE EE 00 08— | 00 T op, 00 91 seeeeeeees! gg eg | 00 OF dg on : ‘ aene eNeeaanooe ee We 00 008 gs T 00 T 00 $2 00 OT 00 08 | 00 0S ek Poe MERCER SSNS i 00 096 0S T | 0OT 00 02 | 00 008. | 00 Sg | 00 09 Ae a ee DY 00 08% 06 T | OT 00 02 | 00 O8T 00 02 | 00 0& ae ee tie roe Ck ope gO Das TCO U ES 00 093 «| SET | OOT 00 0% =|: 00-002 00 0b =| 00 09 | ED) 00 002 «=| «OO T | Gb 00 ST =| (00 O9T 00 0F 00 09 MOUNT 00 0h =| OST 00 T | 00 8T | 00 O8T 00 0F 00 0L OPA B ar 00 08h «=| SLT go T | 00 08 00 006 00 ST 00 08 beige teh 00 008 «=| «OST | ST | 00 S@ 00 OF 00 99 00 OOT ia 077 20AR HT 00 098 09 T | ZI 00 92 00 Ove 00 08 00 ¢9 BEL e ees Gua a EP 0) moe (Ot | at (we |oom (moe |e. Usttnoiorenisneesisnesnesearieeee aq 00 00F ~=«| «09 T | et 00 02 00 022 00 o8 00 O8T deeeseee [Stet ee eee eeereeeeereeeereees (QIBMBIOC 72 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. The following gives the acreage, amount produced and value of Cereals and Hay grown in Pennsylvania; also the number and value of the different Farm Animals, and Pennsylvania’s rank among the different states of the Union for the various products enumerated, in the year 1905. CEREALS, HAY AND FARM PRODUCTS. at : S 00 & g : E s EI g 2 3) fe | 3 ~ < Ay > n { ET yO Saoerelniave cleletalole sielsicietarcinteiiciotoisinisieicisialccrereverae 346, 265 | 5,885,505 bushels. $3, 825, 228 1st. POCALOGSST Se risinicietse cistelnletcielinsssicleteioweniecieisteictere 253,997 22,841,780 bushels. 14, 847,124 2nd. BUC wh eats wi rramisrereeistaraeteetelNeleteiereielelsietereceleloiarel | 232,398 | 4,647,960 bushels. 2,602,858 2nd. Wheat, | 1,629,279 27,860,670 bushels. 24, 238, 784 8th. Corn, | 1,441,997 (86,085,903 bushels. 30, 286, 388 11th. Oats, 1,161,186 39,480,324 bushels. 14, 212,917 6th. Hay, | 8,072,021 | 4,608,032 tons. 54, 973, 822 2nd. HEE SSE Picielsinicinve oyciescivistlelere le ctatetera rele ccisiserbieivia cteveie «| cTazeicicl n PETONSES Mantes terainiatcielevers sists aiereleisiaielolstevolacctciotatctetotevets ayatain afetele eintetoretetelTe ster telers 656, 106 $67, 296, 787 6th. Mules, eraieyoval ciara re ayer ohe/otarsicis larcie aveyevoTaieierolaretateietercle a taleratsiee ieiaieiaclctane Onions 40,459 4,302,002 18th. VEITCH COWS tice snsmacmienile ts cocesicinioeecisenice satpro eiceierieieteaiey | 1,097,580 37, 647, 337 3rd. Other cattle 867,48 . 15,093,386 17th. Sheep, .... 1,102,058 5, 102,529 8th. LORS ie ne 999, 686 8, 447,313 12th. 18100018 «Ao BRC AG Coa AOB CORO LRG a nd obanoducs De totocadate ca eaonel borane dp ounen ce 4,483, 486 4th. PROUD a araters cishsrstanereis sateisiayesesote e cteyaistelsiatere etree MI eT ets TPN aR ieeceeoe ee $142;;872; 840) [Sec crieectee No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 73 The following comparison of these tables for the past four years shows an almost uniform advance in the various products of Penn- sylvania : TABLE OF ‘COMPARISON. 1902. | 1903. | 1904. 1905. 1906. | oe _ — | | al | eae _ SUVIILG AiG ciara) ctaie'e)e\eLeleteleiais\ele/-\ele/»|«1e]-i=invialeleivinlole'sisieis\«1%\e | $0.78 $0.75 $1.08 $0.83 $0.78 COL, ..-ceecessesecsees mC O19 45 | 57 | 62 57 55 Oats, ..-..sesereee 37 | 41 44 yi 40 ina uae ne Ceeee | 3 60 10 “63 Fe wheat, oy 57 : 56 58 tuck clover, 9.43 11.40 10.50 10.00 | 11.00 Hay, timothy, 10.47 14.00 12.00 | 12.00 | 13.50 HOOrsesS, AVETAGC, ..eseee eee eee e cece eee teeee 84.00 115.00 120.00 131.00 | 145.00 MUIeGS, AVETAZC, cecc ccc cc certs esecenecceccscens 77.00 120.00 125.10 139.00 155.00 Cosine CA soy, Noonesbedecoadspaeecopecscaaace 28.00 33.00 35.00 | 85.00 | 3800 TUAMDS, AVETALS, 2. cccccccweecsesecccs cron ceres 2.76 3.50 3.50 | 3.95 | 4,15 BIWES, AVELALE, -.. cers ceerecececreccreeeessece i 2.81 3.45 3.50 | 4.10 | 4.50 Steers, fat, per pound, .......--...-++-.--00e- 05 04 0416 04 | “05 Steers, for feeding, per pound, ............ -08 08 03% 03 04 Swine, shoats. per pound, .....-...++...-+0- -06 -06 .06 05 | (6 oes tat, per pound, 2.0... | -06 06 0644 | 106 | 17 Chickens, dressed, per pound, 36 11 14 13 | | 5 Chickens, live, per pound, 08 10 -10 10 | 11 Apples, per bushel, ............ 35 50 44 70 "55 Peaches, per basket, ............ .15 1.15 82 90 1.10 Pears, per bushel, ........cccscccssccecsncess 81 -98 .94 90 | “90 PIMMIS DEL QUATE, cies cic siciewicisiricisiesisin s sninclesiele 06 07 | 08 | 07 | ‘07 TERT LES Cm ISOT MOLT E, Mete/efele aivisraralatsielelete(nie)alvievsloiaiels 06 .08 | .08 | 08 | “07 Blackberries, Per QUATT, L200. cece eecemciens 07 07 | 08 | 07 “07 IRASPDELVICS, SDE QUAIL, creliaiais nicielelcise cle cis lnele 08 08 09 08 | “08 IPGEALOES eo DCr DUSMEL) see c cies ceteris « caw sie sles ele 50 58 52 | “59 60 Butter, per pound, at STONO UMS ch cee clrtateels 18 .24 «on 22 | p98 Butter, per pound, at market, .............. 22, 24 | 24 25 “97 Milk, wholesale, per 100 pounds, ........... 1.16 1.41 | 1.50 1.30: | 1°50 MiGHi srastEnil forsake her, Aa gbopo pe aoOouOOORop 05 -05 | 05 Nin | 66 Eggs, per dozen, Soma cre tee 18 22 24 | 24 25 Wool, short, unwashed, . Sse 16 18 sea | 25 25 Wool, short, washed, ..... 17 24 .28 31 30 Wool, medium, unwashed, ol 18 | 22 26 | 28 Wool; medium); washed, <2 2... 2c6.. ce. cee ee .20 .25 30 | 39 =) Wioolt, lonley Unwashed =< eGie eves cele ccs crac cveie ais Loe | 59S 29 “39 WWwetil, \wyzllaol, sooeaSunsdnscoscoospgcueDDEDeoT 24 25 | 381 .34 Bh Farm land, improved, value per acre, ..«... 49.00 56.50 | 57.00 55.00 | 60.00 Farm land, value per acre, average, ...... 33.00 39.00 37.00 35.00 | 40.00 Farm wages by year, with board, ......... 153.00 187.00 | 185.00 190.00 210.00 Farm wages, summer months only, ....... | 17.00 20.00 | 20.00 19.00 20.00 Farm wages, by day, with board, ........ 86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 Farm wages, by day, without board, ...... eae 1.40 1.35 1.35 1.40 Farm wages, whole year, cae board,. 196.00 280.00 | 300.00 295.00 300.00 Farm wages, harvest, by day, ............. 1.23 bo | 1.60 1.60 1.65 Farm wages, household ele “female, Sot 2.05 2.35 2.50 2.50 2.50 AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES. A word of commendation is due the management of the County Agricultural and Horticultural Societies of the State in, that former objectionable amusements have been practically eliminated from these exhibitions and greater encouragement and larger premiums offered for farm products and animal entries; also the employment of expert judges to pass upon the merits of the various exhibits is rapidly becoming a means of educating the farmer as to the points of merit in the articles placed in competition, The attendance for 1905 was 975,100, previous year 1,267,803, mak- ing a decrease of 292,703; total membership, 11,015, previous year, 10; 13, making an increase of 502; paid-up membership fees, $7,530.00, previous year, $1, 392.15, making a decrease of $3,862.15; amount paid in premiums, $116,093.32, previous year, $101, 326. 46, making an increase of S14 5166.86; amount offered premiums this year, $143,460.00, previous year, $102,100. 00, making an increase of $41,360.00. 6 Off. Doc. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE 74 "FI-IT "FOG Jeveeeeeeeees CuoraetO "83-92 “ydeg se eeeeecceeee ‘plojxoO ‘PI-IT “300g [+++ ‘aajseqD ISOM *G-Z “300 ee eeeeee ‘aquojellEd *83-cz “ydeg ee oereee ‘uo1ySlyeT "9-G 00 |*** ‘HIeA UO ]ShOxT ")-F ydog seeeeee *U MO} [01IBD | “APOE ONE [eeteeteseeeseeseeeeeeeee | “¥S-16 ‘any eee eee eee eee ‘reyIng “PI-IL ‘ydeg Pee eee ee eeeeeee ‘OL, | *8Z-SZ ‘ydosg een eeeeeee ‘epuBMoy | "e-g "300 oe ‘Supra SPa¢ ‘po see ereennee ‘paojpeq } “08-82 “SNVW [etsees** ‘UMOISHOOFT "ATBT ON |oceserececceccccceeccece LVL any, |**sseeee, Stamey °82-SZ "ydag sense weeree ‘uoyAeC “IBY ON [ittteceettttecseteeeee es IIVH 94} ‘IZ-LE' deg | -ueD ‘yIVd esuBviH ‘Te-12 “Sny |***‘eAoIy SWBITIIM SAVW] ON [eittet sees es eteeee seen “EYB] ON [tettetttteteeseeeeee eens “oe 20810 ‘906T PIPH 00 000‘ | 00000‘ | t*** | 008 =|" “arte % | 000‘er eee enw neeee 00 092s "00 49039 eee eeee ** OTTuL 3% 000 ‘ZT 00 009'F | 00 00L‘F 09 4003g | GET "*‘arpur % | 000‘02 “papyo “OP JON [00 000° |" | ar | *‘arpur % | 000'0% “peplo | -2P JON (00 19% 09 yo0IS|)9 "* arrer % | 000‘Or eee eee ee eee eee eee eee ee 000‘S 09 (ae gee sere si OOS TE 00 000‘ |00002'2 | 0008's | sue |**‘arpur % jrrrsseseeess |00 009‘ | 28 986‘ | tte*'s**| neg | ‘oTFUE % | 00009 00 00F‘T | 00 OSL "0d 4003 | OT "iru % | 000‘ST (00 009% =| 62 080° f'**ttt*t***| OBE |" FOTFUE % | 00008 00 000‘8 00 822 | eee | ** farrur % | 000'69 slesseann eseeseeses) gpg ++ fOTtU 3% | 0008 00 000‘9 | 00 196'% |°09 40038 | 09 "‘arrur % | 000‘0b | 00 008‘s$ | SL 606‘T$ | 00 OTT ose =|" ‘arr % | 00092 eee e eee ee tte twee eevee 00 gz 68 EOC OOU OU) eee eee eee eee dee eseaineael|hsapiraes sta Wemaisnnudths| eoseryailaraeesceesel pant SGAnRRnor ed r crce epi ieteancar tae fa) ee nen ste eee eee enee es OFT Je wwe steer . +. . Gauneueane|encem ene cell Goin a Seven NaS CA Getic ie) ‘0d | a) > R 2 g 5 3 ee : Re leot ee ican 2 3 Maire Ore Alene Fy eae ee ES g s on me 2 : : “sun; WoetIg “di ysiequoeyt Sete ewes SUING xX Heme wee wenee er Peewee wee e ee eeee ‘UoT}EJOOSsW IIB AJUNOD uofreIO |*°° °° SUOMBID ‘UO}VBIOOSSW [Ban}[NopAsSy pasojyxo |*********** ‘4eqseTD ***WOTWBIOOSSW [eINqNopASy AJuNOD sayseyo |*°"**"***** “t8ISeMO “AuBduUoD jeanynoaSy AyUN0D eaquag |** °°" “OaTUAD ‘Ayayoog [eJIisnpuy AJuN0D uoquen |". “WodTED terres (Ca9T00g [eANINIJAsy AJUNOD uoToUTED | “°° ** “Wore *uoI;BIDOSSY [eINJNIISy AJUNOD wlaquieg |" “PTAqQuIeD ‘Ajaloog [eanqynopisy Sanqsuegm {°° *** “elaquiep teeveees COTIBIOOSSW JIB pus SupAjiq szepng |" “ETNA ‘AJaIOOg [wanynosy AOL, sree “prlojpeig teres “KQID0g [wANyNoUsy AJUN0D psoypeag [°° °°" “PLOFpBI ‘AJUNOD syIe_g jo UO]JBIOOSSY [VANZ[NOJAO_T puw yemmjzpnoyasy |e ‘sHO”T teoeee “KVQID0G [BINNOIsy AJuNOH plojypo, NOTTS of Coy ol2 fs | ‘UOTJBIOOSSW JTBq UMOYSHOOPT |e’ STOABO_ teeeeees SR 9100g [BIN}[NIIsy AJUNOD Joavag |*°"*"******* ‘TaABveg seereeestuoIBfoOssW J[Bg AJUNOD Suorjsuasy |°°"**** ‘suorjsuTy *uOr}eOOSs -Sy [woluBYyooW puB [BINnyNOISy uoJAVC j******* ‘suoIjsuUIWy ‘**‘uoI}BIOOSsy [BIN}NopIsy AJUNOD swiepy |" ‘SULBpY *-UOI}IGQIY XG pue JusudwBoug YB asuBipy teeeeees “TOTIIQIUXM OUD S,dosuBiy *BIUBALAS -uueg Jo uUodfEOOssy [BANI[NOWOF{ 97eIg ‘*KyoTOOg [eANyNoIsy o}e}I9 vluUvA[ASUUOT *AJe]OOg Jo sUIeN 9}eI0dI10D *£yUNOD “OV “OOGT JO SMOT}IQINXH [[VA SurplopH oF soprqd PU SOlIv}JOIN0g PUB S}UIPISeIg JO SossaIppY PUB SOWLN YPM ‘SoTJoTIOg [VAN}[MOLISy [wooT pure AJUNOD JO 4ST] 75 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. No. 7. ‘0G-LT “}dag *g-Z °220 “L-y “ydeSg ‘PI-IT “3498 “T8-83 “Any ‘9-F “deS "13-3 “3949S CZ-ST “3490S *G-Z °320 ‘To-81 “dog *“1pey ON [6-83 “sny ‘03-81 “des “ayes ON ‘ITe] ON “Ivey ON ‘Iley ON “IIVyJ ON "PI-ZI ‘ydes “ITB ON ‘L-¥ “ydesg ‘L-b “dag “peprosp JON “I1e] ON *‘L-p “yes “peploep JON *L-p “dag ‘pr ounc "82-92 “"3dag “FO-13 “ony ‘8-6 “PO “ayey ON eee eee eee WodMaN seeeeeeeeeees CUOqIIAT sree “urea qed seeseeeees CUyoaeZeN teeeers ‘Sanqspnoaqg teeeeeeeeeres (Q0caTT seeeesss fO10QS9U019 teeeeee (QrTTASoy SET teeeeeeeesoees tgpirTeq | teseeeees CU MOWWOILVY PTET TPE teeeeereees ‘uoURqarT feteeeeeeees Cys@ing See meena e wee eee eeeerene TEeEeEee eee Tee eE eee ee Seem meee eee eee ene nee Fewer eee een eeeeeranae pe eeeeee ‘TeAOY 0g seevceece ‘OTTTAMO001g BOW OO COG tf ry: jyoied g seecee (STOBYO,ULIBD eee eee ee eee seeeeees “SINGS}TEM ete ete ewe nee '7ye1D * *UM0791 PPI seeseees St MO]SOSOH ewer eeeeeee *QISTIIBD ‘g3ujidg esplaquiep seeaee ‘Banqsuloolg, FORO O Heme eee eaeennee eee 00 009‘ | 00 008"s 00 003‘ | 00 009's 00 000‘0E | 9f 90L‘Or | 00 002'2 00 000‘ | 00 009'2 |*00 Hoo}g fret) ‘oTPUL | 00 000‘ | 00 000‘ | 000‘8 08 00 00F‘S | 00 00F‘T | "02 00S | E22 00 009° | 00 003°% SO COSERHE 35 seeeeeeaeeae eeeeeeeenens : Se Ml ERE EN I Se cesseeseeees! 99 900'8 Lee AI se 00 008‘ | 00 009% 00 yo0Ig jt ; Pee beeeeeeeeeee 99 906 baw m meee eee eee e renee eee 00‘000‘@ 00 000° = ** 00 0032 00 0082 | 00 0g8 | 00 029 Penne ee tenalieeeeeeerenes oo co's jot 00 000‘F 00 000‘F 00 009 ‘T 00 000‘T 00 000‘L FL T92'9 eee ewww e eee [reer eeeeenee tesesseseees! 09 $08'3 |" verses! og veeeee! of seseee! gz 00 000‘ | "09 yooyg ft settee eee eeeee 8 (grrur | 00 OST OST seeee! gg | 00 O9F ‘T Tvs ‘oo yooqg [ttt ‘oo yoorg [rts 00 008 008 seseeees| (grr g-T teseseses “KI9ID00G [BINJNASY AJUNOD Aisoq es eee eee “UOI}BIOOSSY POUEN: § TOTAL seeees IOTPBJOOSSW JIV_ 93e}g BluUvATAsuUsd ***AJ91I00g [ein}[NoAsy AZUNOH uo,durvyyION tereees “KI9IDOG [BIN}NIsy AJUNOH s a) i is S| ® ae 3 e . ae ass 8 | eq ‘20BIld = 3 | 8 a 5 mB s &, 8 *Ayal00g JO suIeN e}eI0d10p * Ail tee ae tit Re te eo 32,324,032 1894, ee Re sete a HO Te es ae as cto 44,392,409 No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 91 TI ee BEE ORs occa 8 a es 48,364,155 is sist Seia ows 67,224,298 oS eee 69,622,246 MRE MN soar i) rth, Si Sires leek washes 56,958,105 URE Reh i cl, ES oa carey tuishen 50,853,234 Ee oo eign, cian Uiak 45,531,207 0 2 acts RR eee re rmns 57,516,136 DM es heh te oe Fay 8G. alas « 83,130,474 EB eins Dene whee eas 107,045,028 kag cs Se eS asain nents 104,943,856 ETRE SY Sea TR RO eee aca 126,316,436 SEE SG nea 71,804,102 2 ICIS Ta EE ae 48,071,480 od a aes, Se eee ees 49,880,982 MT Cy eh. oa Sadie ce at 53,146,659 ES A Se ee oe 1,208,627,919 DEFECTIVE FEDERAL OLEOMARGARINE LAW. The federal statute relating to the manufacture and sale of oleo- margarine is so framed that in order to secure a conviction, it must be proven that such violation was committed “knowingly.” This ~ word must be eliminated from the statute in order to make it fully effective, and all interested in dairying and agriculture have a joint and mutual interest in demanding of Congress a proper modification of the law. The Pennsylvania dairymen are already effectively or- ganized for this purpose, and will wage a strong fight. The State Dairy Bureau of California also objects to the federal oleomargarine statute in addition of the objections urged by Pennsylvania officials, in the following trite language: “A further feature in which the Federal law has proven some- what disappointing as a protection for butter against oleomargarine is the attitude of the Internal Revenue Department of the United States on the question. Although plainly enacted with a view of suppressing the sale of oleomargarine in imitation of butter, the revenue officials seem to view it as a “revenue” measure primarily, and only incidentally as a protection against fraud. Hence, it seems that they do not wish to interfere in a manner that will pre- vent the traffic in oleomargarine, lest this source of revenue for the Government be restricted. In view of these facts, which have received much attention at the hands of the dairy commissioners of the different states, it would be dangerous to the dairy interests of a State that has imitation butter (oleomargarine) under control to relax its hold on the situa- tion.” Pennsylvania has taken the initiative, and will not recede from her demands for the equitable and proper revision of National legisla- tion. ARTIFICIAL COLORING AND THICKENING OF MILK AND CREAM. Although in former years, many samples of milk and cream, when analyzed, were found to be artificially colored or thickened, such instances of deception and fraud are now comparatively rare in this State. The imposition of a heavy fine and costs upon the offenders 92 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. speedily overcame this abuse. The problem received special atten- tion, and the Dairy and Food Division looks upon this achievement with considerable pride. The too common plan of using a “thick- ener” in low grade cream and a coloring material to make it look rich and better than it really was, is no longer a feature of every day dairy practice. The keen competition of rival creamery pro- prietors may be responsible for some trade evils, but “cream thick- eners” and “artificial coloring” was more ‘than they could support, except at a heavy loss. ANALYTICAL WORK OF THE DIVISION. The chemical laboratory work of the Dairy and Food Division has assumed large proportions, as the analytical reports published in the Monthly Bulletin will attest. The equipment of the labora- tory at Harrisburg is first-class, being supplied with entirely new and modern paraphernalia. A detailed report of the operations of the Harrisburg, West Chester, Pittsburg and Erie laboratories would make interesting reading. A large amount of experimental work was also performed. The results will be published by the National Department of Agriculture and in the State publications. In view of the great interest in the use of coal-tar colors and chem- ical preservatives, these investigations will attract wide attention. The Pennsylvania chemists will therefore be of great practical ser- vice to the Nation and State, and to the consumers, generally. THE STEWARDS OF PENNSYLVANIA. The International Stewards’ Association has rendered noble ser- vice in promulgating the pure food doctrine, not only through the medium of its official publication but also in practice. The Pennsyl- vania and Philadelphia branch of the association are among the strongest and staunchest supporters of pure food legislation. Their efforts are worthy of commendation. It is but proper to add that the leading hotel stewards of the State and Nation recognize Penn- sylvania’s attitude in the enforcement of the laws that assure a bet- ter and more healthful food supply. They realize the responsibility of their positions in feeding the masses, and the Dairy and Food Division hereby offers this grateful tribute for their devotion to a cause that possesses such high merit. TESTING FOR BUTTER SUBSTITUTES. Letters from housewives have reached this Division, asking for a simple test by which adulterations or substitutes in butter could readily be detected. The violations of law relative to butter usual- ly consist of the substitution of renovated butter and oleomargarine or butterine for the genuine article, or the sale of butter containing an excessive amount of water. To distinguish the three articles named, follow these directions carefully: “A small portion of the butter (size of a hazlenut) is placed in an ordinary table spoon and heated over a low flame (alcohol lamp, etc.) to the boiling point, stirring constantly with a toothpick or some No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 93 similar article. Genuine butter boils quietly and produces an abun- dance of foam; renovated butter sputters like grease and water when boiled, and produces but little foam; oleomargarine acts very much like renovated butter, boiling with considerable noise and pro- ducing practically no foam. The characteristic odor of tallow also becomes evident when the sample in question is oleomargarine. Butter should not contain an excess of water, which is sometimes purposely incorporated. This may be known by the water oozing out abundantly upon the surface of the butter when cut.” Another test that can be used in determining olemargarine is the following: The “Scientific American” recommends this simple test for oleo- margarine: Stir a small quantity, half a teaspoonful or less, of the suspected butter into enough sulphuric ether to dissolve it. By the time the grease is dissolved the ether will have been evaporated, and the residium will show to smell or taste whether it is butter, lard or tallow. Five cents worth of ether will suffice for several tests. CANNING ESTABLISHMENTS IN PENNSYLVANIA. The Dairy and Food Division has been called. upon at various times to offer advice and suggestions in connection with the organ- ization and location of canning establishments. These plants in many instances were erected by local capitalists mainly because of the rosy promises and prospects which were presented by those di- rectly interested in the sale of the necessary machinery and other material requisite to furnishing such plant. They had compara- tively smali risks, since the joint responsibility of the farmers and others constituting such canning companies was more than ample to secure them against loss. The innovation was a comparatively new one in Eastern Pennsylvania, and it is feared that disappointment and consequent financial loss will also follow some of these invest- ments. It is already evident that the profit lies in canning immense quantities of goods, and that the quality and reputation of the goods placed upon the market by a canning company are a most potent factor in the question of profit and loss. Competition between pro- ducers in the sale of low-grade goods is not conducive to prosperity and success, as some of these investors have already realized. RENEWED ACTIVITY IN SALE OF ADULTERATED LIQUOR. Although thousands of persons are being poisoned daily by chemi- cal whiskey, wines and liquors served to them as the alleged product of some famous distilleries, it is not within the power of the Dairy and Food Commissioner to institute legal proceedings against such offenders and evil doers. There is a startling increase in the number of cases of alcoholic poisoning, and notwithstanding the complaints received at this office, there is nothing that can be done at this writ- ing that will alleviate the unfortunate situation. It is a matter of further regret that the investigations made into the prevailing con- ditions proved that not only the cheaper places sold poisonous and chemically prepared or manufactured drinks, but that many of the so-called “first” places were equally guilty. 94 ANNUAL REPORY OF THE Off. Doe. PRAISEWORTHY ANALAYTICAL RESULTS. While the analaytical work performed during the past year ex- ceeded in volume and importance that of any previous year in the history of the Dairy and Food Division, as the reports of analyses published in the Monthly Bulletin clearly demonstrate, there were no complaints of errors or inaccuracies, and the Commissioner there- fore takes especial pleasure in commending the several chemists for their continued painstaking and watchful efforts to prevent an in- justice being done. The new chemical laboratory established in this city by the Commonwealth is equipped with a complete and modern outfit, and the work assigned to it has again largely increased. The experimental work was necessarily confined to a limited sphere be- cause of the press of general work, but proved valuable and helpful. DANGER IN PROPOSED NEW FOOD LEGISLATION. The pure food law of June 26, 1895, when intelligently and reas- onably enforced, cannot possibly be supplanted by any legislation that would afford better nor greater protection to public health and the consumer in particular. It is apparent that certain interests will demand changes and possibly a new pure food law, so as to more effectively and completely meet the requirements of the new National food and drug statute. The Dairy and Food Commissioner has at all times endeavored to perform his duties with fairness and impartiality, and it would be indeed regretable if certain proposed changes should seriously harass the present good work, and perhaps nullify the excellent results of the past. PRESERVATIVES AND DYES IN FOOD. Hundreds of inquiries were received, relative to the use of chemi- cal preservatives and coal-tar dyes, etc., in food products. The use of benzoate of soda as a preservative is especially common and the fact is known to nearly every intelligent housekeeper. Although no definite official sanction has been promulgated by the Commissioner for such action, the preservative continues to be used, but usually in quantities not exceeding one-tenth of one per cent., and its presence is stated on the label. The harmfulness of the preservative in ques- tion, when used in small amounts, is the subject of an extensive re- search on the part of the Federal authorities, and until their official report is made public, the National and many State governments per- mitted its use tentatively, if not definitely. Curious and singular as it may appear, some of the largest producers of food products have abandoned its use, while leading druggists also declared that there was no longer a real necessity for its use in food products. INTERNATIONAL STEWARD’S ASSOCIATION. The International Stewards’ Association has continued an active campaign for pure food and liquor, notwithstanding that the stew- ard or chef ordinarily could make a larger margin of profit, at the expense of the stomachs of their guests, by purchasing adulterated or inferior goods. It is most gratifying to state that in the case of hotels and restaurants especially, there is less adulterated food used today than has been at any period in the past. The association in No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 95 a large degree, has brought about this much desired change for the better, and the Commissioner is pleased to render this tribute to their helpfulness and commendable work. The Stewards’ Associa- tion has strongly favored the passage of pure food laws, and now insist upon such guarantees and regulations as will enable them to get better food products of all kinds for their tables. IMPROVEMENT IN QUALITY OF FOOD STUFFS. With the continued vigorous enforcement of the pure food laws of Pennsylvania, there has again been a marked improvement in the quality of nearly all food commodities sold in this State. This state- ment is fully corroborated by the published analytical reports of the Dairy and Food Division, which form a sharp and decided contrast with the conditions that prevailed only a few years ago. Manufac- turers, packers and producers of all kinds realize that it pays to obey the law, and that the market for the stuff which bears on the label the tale of adulteration igs no longer a profitable one. To-day, manufacturers of food products whose products were shown by chemical analysis to contain poisons and deleterious substances have either eliminated the objectionable stuff from their wares, or have placed the names and the quantities of the adulterants on the face of the package so that all may buy knowingly. Many other delin- quent manufacturers have withdrawn their goods from the Pennsyl- vania markets. DANGEROUS ADULTHRATION OF FLOUR. The high price of flour has led to a new adulterant which has been detected in the Ohio markets by the State authorities. It is made of white clay pulverized and is cailed mineraline. Because of the fact that it is indigestible, it is a very unwholesome adulterant. It costs about one cent a pound, and as flour sells at three cents a pound, a small proportion of mineraline mixed with the flour makes it quite profitable. It can easily be detected under a microscope. Commissioner Blackburn, of Ohio, who investigated the matter, wrote as follows to the trade who desired information: “A chemical analysis shows that it is a siliceous mineral resemb- ling tale in physical properties. It is insoluble even in the strongest sulphuric acid, and is totally unfit for the purpose for which it is made. It seems to be a kind of clay, dried and powdered very fine, and is shipped from Greensboro, N.C. You are hereby notified to be on the lookout for fiour adulterated with this substance, take sam- ples and leave them with the nearest chemist for analysis. The smallest per cent. of adulteration with this substance can be easily detected under a microscope.” The Pennsylvania authorities have not found any such adulterated flour on sale. : BOGUS DAIRY AND FOOD AGENTS. No one ordinarily has any conception of the many obstacles that must necessarily be overcome in a campaign for pure dairy and food products, but one of the most unpleasant and annoying facts is the occasional appearance of a bogus “special agent” of the Dairy and Food Division. In one instance at least, the guilty party was promptly arrested and subjected to a term of imprisonment. All 96 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. parties concerned can readily satisfy themeslves upon demanding to see the credential carried by the duly authorized and sworn repre- sentatives of the Department of Agriculture, which must in all cases bear the signatures of the Secretary of Agriculture and Dairy and Food Commissioner, respectively. Where such certificate cannot be produced, the Department should be notified by wire with- out delay, and the imposter held for further examination. The special agents of the Dairy and Food Division are amply able to establish their authority to act, and it is hoped they may be accorded proper courtesy while engaged in the performance of duty. OLEOMARGARINE AND RENOVATED BUTTER LICENSES. The following statement will show the number of oleomargarine and renovated butter license certificates issued during the year end- ing December 31, 1906: DICOMAPSATING ; 3:5 55 0)5:02 Sa els ee cee eee 267 henovated: bigter |... 266 ose 5 eae kes le eee 20 CLASSIFICATION OF LICENSES ISSUED. Oleomargarine Licenses. Wholesale ?.o0 2. Clee, 23 ee eee ee 9 eis) MeAIeER 6 Pc os ei eee eee ee eee 248 Besiauraiig..*. 34 steed ce es oe De ee 5 Beardims houses... 30.2 30 403 ce ee eee 5 Totals hoe Ss eee Sa eee ee ee 267 Renovated Butter Licenses. Whotlessle o. 42.02 544 ote an oe es oe ee ae ee ee Zz Beall lealeris oS eects bee Se eh enh ore ig Boardimes houses. 55. 2302 fe. ks Se oe eee 1 POtal: |. oh. ace eed ots are ie ee eee 20 - The aggregate amounts received and paid into the State Treasury for the use of the Commonwealth, was as follows: Olepmarcsarine lieewisess.o.2 <2 fan, doesent $23,819,36 Renovated butter licenses, 2.0 05.0%.2. 6.6 +- Ze 2,466.68 BOT AS 5< 8 oi. arate Le ere, ein) oes Se $26,286.04 In conformity with previous customs, the appended financial statements are respectfully submitted: No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 97 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, 1901 TO 1906, INCLUSIVE. 1901. 1902. 1903. | 1904. 1905. 1906. TPa ete ais A srignoscooeudeans $4,833 23 | $8,082 20 | $39,752 18 $53,904 05 | $33,414 46 $37,414 09 Oleomargarine license fees, act | | EAM ciet ofa cio|s\si tinieicicickata syoleeinin ererea's RTE Te |hoaspobocucd pakacosdhsco, pacabedbcrotd bacsadcoeeuen|bonsactoabe Mic dines, act 1901.7 0... sens. a- Siecp seen) OO 1,177 24 6,093 6 1,972 68 1,298 63 Oleomargarine license fees, act MEN no riatrelcimiicicicmeeaciiedcine 1,089 26 | 23,927 05 | 37,911 26, 823 23 23,819 35 Oleomargarine fines, act 1899,.. 5,446 97 3,238 18 GEE 20 5 Soi OD Nee ester ssaieta co] imretardtetacs eterna Oleomargarine fines, act 1901,.. 2,070 87 5,225 75 | 5.997 28 10,890 98 13,145 27 @leomearrarine Hnes: (ACE 189s |e cece meee [rece ececnees RAMI AAC sages coqac || comaccascor Renovated butter fines, act 1899, 120 00 5 90 ATW SMO stata vasavacens,e aeral] acm alstevetare sera lee ietets reese Renovated butter fines, act 1901,|............ 572 68 1,632 05 1,383 14 982 00 Renovated butter licenses, .... 175 00 766 67 266 6 4,800 03 2,466 68 Cheese fines, TGRNGLING |S 6A Sscogaua Src otay | erstatetaeteicteiots Vinegar fines, 447 24 779 34 |.. ENC ITIOS © 3c crores cine ain ae 23 00 357 00 Pere TUL) TIMES thy Siow > cieleiflevs sicree\ciereialais hic.cyam veya siete el poiaielaseie sisre-s/els } LO EDIP (OSS AGLI 7 Sane Gea aooocnel SSR dCOObOTeS | MOSOUE AGH IacH NBonacconoch } SNES VIED TER aC tie LGU) ncicye)| cis cic [asciviowesele [hein Gama si cieiess|leereletels jae ares SPhe GH GGL iy aU TRcee Sehr nesal Soboae ob cobl HOS OSEnS>rE (REC iBeCe ren Nees tnetrs $34,705 19 | $43,635 41 | $93,458 71 | $96,183 23 | $82,467 60 | $79,590 35 These comparative statements covering a period of six years show at a glance that there is no State in the Union that has more rigid- ly and effectively sought to enforce dairy and food laws than the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. It can be said with equal truth that the food aduiterator has a higher regard for the wholesome laws of this State than ever before, and that in very many instances he has unwillingly abandoned our markets and concentrated his efforts to sell his goods in other States. PROSECUTIONS DURING 15v6. As was confidently expected, there was another decrease in impure, adulterated and deleterious food products found on sale in this State in 1906. Asa result of these gratifying results, our sev- eral chemists recommended a largely diminished number of cases for prosecution. These reports were more than pleasing to the officers of the Dairy and Food Division as they again demonstrated the ef- fectiveness and success of past campaigns for pure and better food supplies for Pennsylvania. The appended figures are self explana- tory, and need no special comment. The total number of prosecu- tions ordered during the past four years for violations of the dairy and food laws of Pennsylvania for the respective years, were as fol- lows: {NESINES 20 ele geal UR ea A i Sea 1200 “CU A RGR Ne ae Orpen Se Mae ee rte: 1517 CE RE ESE 8 ee ene te Ca 1085 ELS. et hy RI al glen I ee anon 1050 TREE Ge Fe 1) ee Seat eae aI nine IRE 5452 Should any material change be made in the laws now regulating the manufacture, sale and production of food and dairy products, it is more than likely that such legislation will be framed to protect the re‘ail merchants and small dealers, even if it is done at the ex- pense cf the consumers. 7—7T—1906. 98 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE. Off. Doc. MISREPRESENTING FOOD OFFICIALS. Uuscrupulous manufacturers have at different times prowl claims to the effect that the United States Government authorities as well as the Pennsylvania Dairy and Food officials had officially endorsed and guaranteed the purity of their goods. Reference to this subject was made in previous reports, and the Commissioner therefore can only reiterate the statement that no such authority was given or implied in Pennsylvania. The manufacturer may make and offer for sale pure goods, and individually, he is perfectly privi- leged to present such a guarantee; but, he cannot authoratively assert that the Dairy and Food Commissioner has endorsed the purity and wholesomeness of such article. The analytical reports which appear in the Monthly Bulletin are open to public inspection and form their own comments, but beyond the publication of such reports, the Dairy and Food Division neither cOurtS nor claims re- sponsibility. Such improper advertising is to say the least of doubt- ful propriety, if not entirely indefensible. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, reports to the contrary nothwithstanding, does not guarantee any article of food. A DEMAND FOR BETTER BREAD. With the increase of scientific knowledge amongst the people generally, comes a demand for the better sanitary surroundings in all food producing establishments. Letters complaining about un- sanitary bake-shops, etc., were not infrequent. Others alleged that they were deceived through the purchase of “mixed flour;” others again claimed that employes with malignant ulcers and sores worked in bakeries, while still others protested against the em- ployment of tuberculous people in bakeries. According to experi- ments made in Paris, the latter protest was well-founded. The re- port reads ag follows: “The experimentor was struck with the idea that, taking into consideration the physical conditions of many bakers, it might be possible that infectious diseases should be trans- mitted in that way. He introduced into some dough balls some Baccillus tuberculosis. The dough was baked in the ordinary fashion and the bread fed to pigs. They died, and on being examined it was found that death was due to tuberculosis. These facts and theories are not new, and the only bearing they have at present is to accentuate the position which is taken now, by sensible scientists and by intelligent tradesmen, of the necessity of producing bread under as good and cleanly conditions as are possible.” UNFOUNDED COMPLAINTS AS TO FOOD PRODUCTS. What may be regarded variableness of formulas for making vari- ous food products frequently misleads the consumer as to quality and healthfuiness, and as a result, a letter of complaint is filed with the Dairy and Food Commissioner. If such article is sold for what it is, and does not contain any illegal constituent, the rights of the purveyor cannot be questioned. Of course, unsanitary conditions should not be tolerated, neither should the publie be deceived as to the quality and merit of an article of food. A “trick” or an im- position invariably yields trouble for the manufacturer and dealer, but wherever practicable, full justice will be done to all concerned. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 99 CO-OPERATION OF PURE FOOD OFFICIALS. The arduous work of the year now ending has again impressed the great necessity for a better and more effective plan to cooperate with the National and State governments in enforcing food laws. The mutual aid that could thus be easily bestowed would prove most helpful, bring these various officials into a more intimate and closer business and social relationship, and also dispel some of the petty jealousies that should never exist in official circles. We want better conditions, and the attitude of the Pennsylvania authorities will be strictly for that line of cooperation which will produce the greatest amount of good for the greatest number. FEDERAL VERSUS STATE FOOD LAWS. With the enactment of a National Food and Drug Act, there were many people who believed that such a measure would supplant State laws. This, however, is a mistaken idea, and while the Federal law should have a streng tendency to check adulteration, in certain kinds, namely, on goods shipped into the State from other States, it cannot and does not prevent adulterations of goods intend- ed for home consumption. Strict State laws and their proper and vig- ous enforcement are therefore as desirable and necessary as before the enactment of the Federal law. The Federal law naturally is an object of special interest at present, and the interested cannot do better than to make a careful and extended study of both the National and State laws. GRATEFUL ACKNOWLEDGMENT. The most cordial thanks are hereby extended to His Excellency, Governor Pennypacker, and to Hon. N. B. Critchfield, Secretary of Agriculture, for their much appreciated support and advice in con- nection with the performance of the arduous and intricate duties that devolved upon the Dairy and Food Commissioner. The press of Pennsylvania again demonstrated its willingness to champion the cause of pure food and drink, and is entitled to special praise. The agricultural organizations, grangers, grocers and clergy, and the faithful attaches of the Dairy and Food Division, whether employed in the office, field or chemical laboratories, are also entitled to a full measure of gratitude and praise for duties conscientiously and well- performed. Without such hearty support and intelligent aid re- ceived, the success achieved would not have been possible. Very respectfully, Dairy and Food Commissioner. 100 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. REPORT OF THE STATE VETERINARIAN FOR 1906. Harrispure, Pa., January 1, 1907, Honorable N. B. Critchfield, Secretary of Agriculture, Harrisburg, as: Sir: I have the honor to submit the following report on the work of the office of the State Veterinarian and upon the work of the State Livestock Sanitary Board for the year 1906. In order that the distinction between the work of office of the State Veterinarian and the work of the State Livestock Sanitary Board may be clear, I will refer briefly to the history of these offices. The office of the State Veterinarian is established by auth- ority of the Act approved March 13th, 1895, entitled “An act to es- tablish a Department of Agriculture and to define its duties.” The same act places certain responsibilities upon the Department of Agri- culture with regard to distributing information upon the raising and care of livestock and the supervision of the health of animals.- The same legislature enacted a law entitled “An act to establish the State Livestock Sanitary Board, and to provide for the control and suppression of dangerous, contagious or infectious diseases of domestic animals.” This act was approved by the Governor May 21, 1895, that is, more than two months subsequent to the approval of the act organizing the Department of Agriculture. The State Livestock Sanitary Board, as established under the second act re- ferred to, is composed ef the Governor of the Commonwealth, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Dairy and Food Commissioner and the State Veterinarian. This Board is authorized to protect the health of the domestic animals cf the State and to determine and employ the most efficient and practical means for the prevention, suppression, control or eradication of dangerous, contagious or in- fectious diseases among domestic animals... For these purposes, the Board is clothed with certain powers in relation to establishing and maintaining quarantines, the disinfection of certain localities and articles and the destruction of animals, as it may deem neces- sary. It is also clothed with additional powers and duties under later Acts of Assembly. The distinction, then, between the office of the State Veterinarian and the State Livestock Sanitary Board is that the general subjects in relation to the health of animals that concern individual owners and that touch upon the general welfare of animals and animal husbandry, fali under the act organizing the Department of Agricul- ture, and are assigned by the Secretary of Agriculture to the State Veterinarian. On the other hand, the control of dangerous, con- tagious or infectious diseases of animals—the diseases that spread and that are of importance to a community and to farmers whose animals are as yet unaffected—fall under the jurisdiction of the State Livestock Sanitary Board. In other words, the State Veter- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 101 inarian has certain duties as an officer of the Department of Agricul- ture in assisting in the development of animal husbandry, and he has other duties as a member of the State Livestock Sanitary Board in regard to the suppression of infectious diseases and in the per- formance of other duties specifically prescribed by law. It is difficult, in some cases, to define the line of demarcation be- tween these two classes of duties, and no effort has been made on my part to separate them. The duties of the State Veterinarian as an officer of the Department of Agriculture and as a member of the State Livestock Sanitary Board have been attended to as they have arisen in the day’s work, with no effort to classify the task. My only reason for referring to these subjects at this time is that the work that falls to me in these two capacities has increased so very much during the last few years that it is no longer possible to conduct it without considerable additional help. If such assist- ance is to be asked for, the question will at once arise as to wether it should apply to the Department of Agri- culture or to the State Livestock Sanitary Board. My idea is that the increase should be in the office of the State Veterinarian, that is to say, in the Department of Agri- culture. The reason for this recommendation is that the State Livestock Sanitary Board is already authorized by law “to appoint and employ such assistants and agents” as may be neces- sary in carrying out the provisions of the law under which the Board is established. Yhat is, the scope of authority of the State Livestock Sanitary Board in this direction is similar to the author- ity of the Department of Health as to the appointment and employ- ment of such persons as it may be necessary to appoint and employ to carry out the mandates of the law. I suggest that the legislature be asked for authority to employ a clerk and a stenographer for the office of the State Veterinarian. Each head of a division in the Department, except the State Veterinarian, already has such assistance. Technical assistants, inspectors, etc., are now employed as required by the State Livestock Sanitary Board. There is need, however, for additional help in the adminisration of the large vol- ume of work that comes to my office. As to the growth of the work that is now conducted: ‘The corres- pondence of the office has doubled in less than four years. The livestock owners, veterinarians and sanitarians are using the facili- ties of the office and of the laboratory more freely than ever before. The office is called upon for advice with regard to problems in all branches of animal husbandry, dairying and the veterinary sciences. Most of these communications can be answered from the office, some, however, are referred to appropriate experts. The principal work, as heretofore, has consisted in the control of infectious diseases, which are reported upon separately below. It will be observed that there has been a considerable increase in the amount of work that has been required in relation to rabies and glanders. The distribution of these diseases is such that they may occur in any part of the State, at any time, so that constant watchfulness must be maintained. According to the last estimate of the United States Department of Agriculture, the number and value of the domestic animais on the farms of Pennsylvania is as follows: 102 ANNUAL REFORT OF THE Off. Doe. | Number. Value. | TT GTSGS aise carsineaneie nistaele rie aici afr aaieie © aid. aictatuln S)atalaseeiaialote Coeleet enn Cre oie erataerete etre 607,010 © $66,127,689 2 Be ocbc OC UODTAO DOH OCA UTOO ree OCD ansoad con oe scccorodecosb dona bepoad 40,864 | 5,024, 210 INETICH SGOWS), | lolo)sle lelercivls lets mlojeleinicie, sieve e nlclereleravotoletersieiatete atercictopeeicieinenntcic alent tiesto 1,141, 494 41,093, 784 Other cattle, shoe eae 984,750 17, 479, 308 SSHECD I feiss ois oie is d 4 1,102,058 5,353, 799 BSI os ere mala sicretcintssesa avareyanele\elaferaicks @tatone.oieresaresutace, statalaialona.s elmreiateta cletacal SaeretvoRteesteiteetae 989, 685 9,303,039 The above table does not include animals not on farms, nor does it include pouliry. According to the census of 1900, there were 242,465 horses and mules in cities and towns which, at present prices, are worth $26,739,625. The value of the poultry in the State is estimated at $5,000,000; this makes a total valuation of livestock of approximately $175,- 000,000. This industry is the main stay of a large proportion of the 224,600 farms of Pennsylvania. Yo a very large extent, the crops raised on these farms are fed to animals and are marketed as animals or animal products, the chief of which is milk. The importance of our animal husbandry is, therefore, very great both to the rural people and to the inhabitants of cities who depend so largely upon the products of the animals of the state for food. Animal hus- bandry, very properly, ranks as one of the leading industries of Pennsylvania. In connection with such an industry there are many important problems, the solution of which is of large significance to those engaged in it. Many of these problems relate to the health of animals and fall within the domain of comparative pathology. Others relate to the production and development of animals. All of these problems, in many of their relations, at least, may properly be classed among the veterinary sciences. It is, therefore, appar- ent that there is a large field for the veterinary work of the State, and that all that is now done in this direction is not only amply justified by the magnitude of the industry, and its problems, but that far more might be done without danger that this work will become out of proportion to the industry that it is to foster. When one considers the enormous losses, amounting to five or six million dollars a year, that result from the neglect of preventible causes of diseases of animals, it is clear that it is the duty of the State to develop its facilities for preventing this enormous and unnecessary annual depletion of its capital. This can be accomplished by pro- viding increased facilities for veterinary work, including the veter- inary cae of the Department of Agriculture, the work of the State Livestock Sanitary Board and the work of the veterinary college. EXPENDITURES. For the fiscal year ending May 31, 1906, the State Livestock Sanitary Board had available $45,000.00 for its general work in repressing diseases of animals. Expenditures under this fund may be classified as follows: for tuberculosis cattle, $23,344.06; for inspecting tuberculous cattle and herds, $3,886. 92: for horses afflicted with glanders, $2,941; for inspections for the repression of diseases other than tuberculosis, for vaccination, ete., $4,293.60; for the cost of enforcing quarantines, for materials used in making tuberculin, for making and shipping tuberculin, for the diagnosis of specimens, etc., $3,309.31; for office and miscellaneous No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 103 expenses, $4,554.46; for the enforcement of the law requiring the inspection of cattle shipped from other states, $2,670.65. THE LABORATORY. The laboratory has, unfortunately, lost the services of Dr. Samuel H. Gilliland, who has been connected with it for a number of years and who has been in charge of the production of biologic products and of the diagnosis of specimens sent in since the resignation of Dr. M. P. Ravenel. Dr. Gilliland has also been closely associated with the work upon the immuniza- tion of cattle against tuberculosis. He has taken a very important part in the conduct of the incomplete investigations of the State Livestock Sanitary Board in this field. The necessity for his de- parture on account of ill health is very much regretted. During the year the laboratory made and sent out 19,880 c.c of tuberculin, 722 doses of anthrax vaccine and 3,699 doses of mallein. A large number of specimens were sent to the laboratory for diagno- sis, including the following: | | S | ov 1 Vee ea & | ae ras] 2 mn 1) = a ras) | C5) ° iS | fe A g E.SSIGS, codcenSuadcbReGu me aecol CNP AE DEE Sto aC eC RE Gena cee ae nEener | so | 15 | 2 97 LNT TBESES gecnin gone COS COUCUS CAG JONRBCOHe ROC ATOM TO TCoCAure aera eEaenae 2 | 1 | Sreloterclisentcrs 14 “WS STROTTSISIS Ga aabocadaspedion SO SOS DOHEEN Da TOS EODB CBOE iESero oaena tee | 19 | A ermieinietetaiare 32 EGGILFSKI Gagnben dango Bes cop CUOUE-OUDn, CO OCEEOOEE BRC eE Eco cr reece 41 | EG |Sretererieraierere 57 There were also submitted a large number of samples of milk, tumors, parasites and of pathological material. Re Much work has been done to establish the reliablity of the method generally used in the rapid diagnosis of rabies, as is explained under the section in relation to that disease. The laboratory diagnosis of glanders has usually depended upon the method of Strauss. In addition to this method, the agglutination test was made with blood serum from 24 horses. The serum of 8 horses aggluntinated the baccilli of glanders in the dilution of 1-1000 and over. Several showed a well marked agglutination in dilution of 1-2000. The serum from 16 horses that were free from glanders, caused an agglutination in dilution of more than 1-500 in but one instance, the average being 1-300. The exception caused a distinct agglutina- tion in a dilution from 1-600; in this case the serum was taken from the blood of a horse suffering with acute lymphangitis. Ail of the ‘work in relation to the diagnosis of rabies and glanders has been carried on by Dr. John Reichel. The result of his work in regard to the aggluination test for glanders indicates that this method is destined to be of service in connection with the control of this disease. The experimental work carried on at the farm has been under the care of Dr. E. S. Deubler, who has also conducted some of the work of the laboratory. Several important lines of research have been conducted that Drs. Deubler and Reichel who will re- port through other channels. Dr. C. Y. White continues patholo- gist to the laboratory. A large amount of pathological work has 104 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. been done during 1906 including the rabies work of Dr. Reichel. The following structures and tissues were examined: Medulla oblongata, 108 Ganglia, 101 Hippocampus major, 108 Cerebellum, 118 Lung, 63 Lymph gland, 27 Liver, Bo Spleen, 19 Kidney, 13 Tumors, ib7 Intestine, 4 Miscellaneous, 3d 648 EXPERIMENTAL FARM. The work of the experimental farm has progressed very satisfactorily in so far as the experiments con- cerning the vaccination of cattle against tuberculosis are concerned. It is important that other subjects shall be taken up and if this is to be done in connection with the work that is now in progress more accommodations for animals will be necessary, more buildings will be required and more pasture land. With a comparatively little increase in this direction as contrasted with the need for and the value of the work several other subjects that should be in- vestigated can be taken up. It is not possible, for example, to study abortion, calf cholera or infectious garget in connection with the present herd because all of these diseases jeopardize the offspring, and it is necessary, in connection with our tuberculosis vaccination work that young animals shall be produced and raised. Therefore, if these diseases are to be studied, such studies must be made upon separate animals, maintained entirely apart from the present herd. Some experiments on the breeding of animals are being considered in connection with the cattle that are used in the experiments on tuberculosis. If it is decided that such experiments would be likely to be instructive and important, and if they can be carried on in- cidentally with the other work it would appear to be wise to undertake them. The kind of information that this farm and the laboratory of the State Livestock Sanitary Board are maintained to produce is needed upon every farm and by every farmer in Pennsylvania. Individual farmers cannot afford, nor have they the equipment that would make it possible for them to conduct the researches through which relief may be had. Their situation is quite different from that of a corporation that is in position to employ experts to help it. And so governments of all countries have recognized this need as it applies to the individual and the country at large, and have taken steps to meet it, as here contemplated. GLANDERS. This disease has attained considerable prevalence in Pennsylvania, not so much as a result of spreading within the State, but from repeated introduction from outside of Pennsylvania. It is well known that glanders prevails extensively in some of the No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 105 western states and in several of the large cities of the east, particu- larly New York city. Some of the infected localities are under the jurisdiction of competent veterinary, sanitary officers and others are not. Some states and cities pay very little attention to this subject. The prices of horses have been abnormally high during the past two years. This has served to encourage dealers to gather up and market horses that, under normal conditions, would be regarded as undesirable, if they were not positively unsaleable. Cheap horses have been taken to cities from the country and questionable horses on the ranges and farms and in the horse marts ofthe west have been spirited away and sold if some question has occurred in regard to their health, on account of the unusual prices that they bring. All of this has resulted in the introduction of an unusual number of glandered horses into Pennsylvania. It hag been found repeatedly that horses afflicted with glanders have recently been brought into the state and then, of course, casés occur among horses exposed to contact with these. The following table shows the counties in which glanders occurred, the number of horses condemned and the number of horses exposed and tested with mallein. — —_——— County. Exposed and tested. Condemned. > is = oO 09 mn Oe - is} i] La So os on et Oe Berks, ocire, | ye rel sSadacguese (SUES HELE” Op egos Se Op IEC Se aoa go Be atepersfolapatetsia eyehe,staiai<)otsieys chelate, cisia sveictasshovaveielonsietave eichal svermrsioroes | MORE MUTEE CONCEL oe setatel cYstetere ars etek ecavcia niniciviotelersiateltess oe aieie aco ete eioreivtsis wiia\ spaietarainleretolerevoisre wie rarercie Wistcierenee | 1 (AT DTEAPE STAG WOE Ont 8 Be he Qe ob Gua PEC GOGO D BOD o TORAC IOC COS CRORETOR MAE Een Renn amr ea ae or 2 9 Delaware, 1 IDA: SSnpseoe Fayette, Franklin, Jefferson, Lancaster, Luzerne, McKean, Montgomery, Philadelphia, lEGUiiae espaGeaun Genny CoCOHee AeA Susquehanna, ave foe eee | Uhetioha SAGaeoeneeosnded ms mcrae phere Bek Mokia Pe | 1 Washington, Wyoming, eee 10id oo BEOOE Eee eet Seta OER cca ater ease Nien ca ee eh || an an 5 ba an ee 1, 826 283 It will be observed that glanders occurred in 22 counties, that 1,826 horses were exposed and tested and that 283 were condemned and destroyed. Since the largest number of shipped horses are brought to the large cities of Philadelphia and Pittsburg, it hap. pens, naturally that the largest number of cases were found in Phila- dephia and Allegheny counties. The large number of caseg found in York county resulted from a shipment of two carloads of range horses received during the latter part of 1905. Many of these horses 8 ’ 106 ANNUAL REFORT OF THE Off. Doe. were infected, and they spread infection among the horses in stables that they occupied. From this center, glanders was carried to some neighboring counties and everything was ready for the beginning of a very extensive and widespread outbreak when the disease was dis- covered. In connection with the suppression of this outbreak in York, difficulty arose in regard to the destruction of one of the badly infected and manifestty diseased horses. In order that the author- ity of law for dealing with such cases might be made clear, the fol- lowing inquiry was sent to the Attorney General: Office of the State Veterinarian, Harrisburg, Pa., February 16, 1906. Hon. Hampton L. Carson, Attorney General, Harrisburg, Pa. Sir: I beg to apply to you for advice on the following subject: The State Livestock Sanitary Board is authorized under the Act approved May 21st, 1895 (P. L. No. 66) to take certain action for the prevention, suppression, etc., of infectious diseases among domestic animals, and, in particular, it is authorized and empowered to de- stroy animals, as may be necessary. It is, however, provided, that when it shall be deemed necessary to condemn and kill an animal to prevent the spread of disease, and when an agreement cannot be made with the owner for the value thereof, that three appraisers shall be appointed, one by the owner, one by the commission (Board) or its authorized agent, and the third by the two so appointed, who shall, under oath or affirmation, appraise the animal. The Act of March 30, 1905 (P. L. No. 56) provides, in Section 5, certain limits - of appraisement, but does not modify the procedure with relation to appraisement. The point in this connection upon which I need in- formation is as to the authority of the State Livestock Sanitary Board to condemn and order the destruction of a horse afflicted with glanders, the owner of which refuses to enter into any agree- ment as to the value of the animal or to designate an appraiser to represent him. ‘The horse in question is incurably diseased. Glan- ders is a highly infectious disease, easily transmissible to horses and mules and also to men. ‘he horse is now in quarantine and is kept in a partially isolated stall, from which it is not permitted to be removed, but the conditions are such that the continued exist- ence of this horse on the premises of its owner constitutes a menace to the health of the horses and mules, and to a less degree of persons, in the neighborhood. Very truly yours, LEONARD PEARSON, State Veterinarian. In response to this inquiry the following reply was received: No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 107 Office of the Attorney General, Harrisburg, Pa., March 15, 1906. Dr. Leonard Pearson, State Veterinarian, Harrisburg, Pa. Sir: You have asked my advice as to the authority of the State Livestock Sanitary Board to condemn and order the destruction of a horse afflicted with glanders, the owner of which refuses to enter into any agreement as to the value of the anima! or to designate an appraiser to represent him. I answer that the Acts of May 21st, 1895 (P. L. 91) and March 30th, 1905 (P. L. 78) both relate to the prevention and suppression of dangerous, contagious and infectious diseases among domestic animals. The first Act provides for the establishment of the State Livestock Sanitary Board. The second Act defines the duties and powers of the Board, providing in Section 5 certain limits of ap- praisement with respect to animals thatthe Board deems it neces- sary to destroy in order to prevent the spread of disease, but this sec- tion does not modify the procedure with reference to appraisement. I am of opinion that the appraisement should be made under the first named Act, observing the limits set up by the second. If the owner of the animal condemned to death refuses to appoint an appraiser under the sanction of the Act of 1895, and otherwise obstructs the Board in carrying out the provisions of the Acts re- ferred to, he can be prosecuted under Section 5 of the Act of 1895. I can find no way pointed out by which he can be compelled to designate an appraiser, but as Section 2 of the Act of 1895 confers abundant power upon your Board to order the destruction of the horse in question, provided it is deemed necessary for the suppres- sion of dangerous, contagious and infectious diseases among domes- tic animals, I do not hesitate to advise you that you are authorized to employ the most efficient and practical means for the prevention, suppression, control or eradication of dangerous contagion or in- fection, and that, if you are satisfied that the horse is incurably diseased; that glanders is a highly infectious disease easily trans- missible to horses and mules and also to men; and that the horse now in quarantine constitutes a menace to horses and mules, and, in a less degree, to persons in the neighborhood, you have the power to take and kill the horse. If you are resisted, the person so resisting should be dealt with under Section 5 of the Act of 1895. You are, of course, authorized to employ such force as is necessary to enable you to execute fully your duty. Very respectfully, HAMPTON L. CARSON, Attorney General. The general system for dealing with glanders has not been changed. The agglutination test for diagnosis has been used ex- perimentally, and as the test proves to be satisfactory, its use is to be extended. On account of the unusual number of cases of introduced glanders, it has been proposed, from several sides, that an inspection ought to be made of all horses entering Pennsylvania from other 108 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. states. In reference to this suggestion, it may be said, a great many horses suffering with incipient glanders show no symptoms of dis- ease. A large number of horses exposed to glanders and in con- dition to develop it might readily be passed as sound if nothing but a physical examination is relied upon; therefore, to render it possible to exclude, with accuracy, horses aiflicted with glanders in the early stages, it would be necessary to submit all horses to the mallein test or to make the agglutination test with a sample of blood sent to the laboratory. This would occasion considerable delay in the shipment of horses and would be an expensive pro- cedure. The cost would amount to not less than $1 per horse. The cost would, in any case, be very much greater than the cost of dealing with the outbreaks of glanders as they arise. If the disease can be controlled in Pennsylvania at a cost of $10,000 a year, and it is not likely to be more than this, it would seem to be unjustifiable to incur an expenditure of $50,000 to $106,000 a year to keep glanders out of the State. Of course there is another side to the question in addition to the economic side that is referred to, and that is the public health relation of this disease; glanders is transmissible to man and deaths from glanders occur occasionally among persons infected from horses. Fortunately, this danger is small and can be almost entirely avoided by promptly reporting horses with glanders as is required by law, so that they may be disposed of by the state veterinary service. The most important point in connection with the control of this disease is prompt reporting, on the part of horse owners and veterinarians. If all cases were reported just as soon as glanders is known to exist, or is suspected, these losses, and the attendant dangers, would be very much less than they are. ANTHRAX. Anthrax has occurred during the past year in the following counties: Berks, Bradford, Chester, Erie, Lancaster, Mc- Kean, Potter, Susquehanna, Tioga, Warren and York. 63 cows, 2 mules and 2 horses are known to have died of anthrax (other deaths from this cause are probable), and 661 animals were vac- cinated. The Pasteur system of vaccinating has been modified to the extent of using two vaccines instead of three. In some cases, however; that is, where the infection is particularly severe and the danger is esteemed to be unusually great, a third vaccination is made. The results from vaccination have been very satisfactory. It has happened in two instances that animals have died after the first vaccination. A laboratory study was made oi one of these cases and it was found that death resulted from anthrax. The culture recovered revealed an organism of much higher virulence than that of the vaccine, and so it was considered that the animal must have become infected frem an outside source, either before it was vaccinated or shortly thereafter. Im this case, there was no swelling at the seat of inoculation, that is at the place where the vaccine was injected; this was regarded as evidence in favor of infection from some other source. The number of anthrax cases appears to be diminishing as the centers of the disease have been located and are kept under surveillance. BLACKLEG. Blackleg has occurred during the past year in the following named counties: Bradford, Butler, Cambria, Clarion, Clear- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 109 22! Susquehanna, Wayne, Warren, Westmoreland, Wyoming and York. 134 farms in these counties were believed to be infected with black- quarter, because the disease has occurred upon them during recent years, or because it hag occurred under similar conditions on other farms in the same neighborhood. 123 animals died on these farms before vaccination was applied. 1,396 animals were vaccinated. There were no deaths from blackleg following vaccination, so far as is known field, Erie, Huntingdon, Lycoming, Montgomery, Potter, Somerset, HEMORRHAGIC SEPTICAEMIA. This disease occurred during the year in the counties of Chester, Clearfield, Cumberland, Luzerne, Potter, Tioga, Venango and Warren. 106 horses and cattle died. Unfortunately, there is at present no means available for vaccinat- ing cattle against this disease. It is believed that there is much more hemorrhagic septicaemia among cattle in Pennsylvania than is reported, and that it is a common cause of death. Many cattle and some horses pasture on mountain land, and it is in such regions that the disease is most frequent. It appears to be probable that animals become infected with the organisms of this disease very much as they do with the organism of anthrax, that is through the respiratory and the digestive tracts and through inoculation by means of wounds in the skin. On account of the seat of the most common lesions of the disease, there are some who believe that it is by inhalation that infection most frequently occurs. The mode of entrance of the germs of the disease is not of so much importance as their source. As the disease is one of locality, it seems to be probable that the soil may harbor the contagion. This points to the necessity for disposing of the carcasses of infected animals in such a way as to prevent the infection of the soil. All carcasses of animals that die of hemorrhagic septicaemia, as well as all carcasses of animals that die of anthrax or blackquarter, ought to be cremated as close as possible at the spot where death occurs. The chronic form of hemorrhagic septicaemia that is described in some of the western states, and especially in Minnesota, has not been recognized in Pennsylvania. The form of hemorrhagic septicaemia that occurs here is acute and is characterized by the occurrence of numerous small hemorrhages upon the serous membranes, in the lungs and in the subcutaneous connective tissue, by serous and sometimes bloody infiltration in the connective tissue about the larynx, the throat and the head, and by small hemorrhages upon the intestines. The lungs frequently show acute pneumonia accompained by serous infiltra- tion in the interlobular connective tissue. A symptom that is occassionally observed is hemorrhages through the skin, occuring as fine drops, as though the skin had been pricked with a needle The disease is nearly always fatal. Additional laboratory studies of this disease are urgently needed, and are being made as opportunity offers. Each reported case is investigated and advice is given as to the removal of cattle from infected lands, as to their quarantine until the period of incubation is past before removal to uninfected farms, and as to the proper disposal of carcasses. 110 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. TEXAS FEVER. During the past year a number of cases of Texas fever occurred. 380 cows died; 19 affected recovered. These 49 cases were among 225 cattle, chiefly cows, and nearly all were shipped from Ohio and Chicago to points in eastern Pennsylvania. Examination showed a few ticks on the affected animals. It was thought, at first, that infection had occurred in the west or, possibly, at the Pittsburg stockyards. Both of these possibilities were looked into with the result that no evidence could be found which tended to connect either the point or origin or the Pittsburg stock- yards with the occurrence of the disease. It was not until Texas fever occurred among some cattle shipped from Bradford County, Pa., to Chester County that the source of infection was traced with any degree of probability. It was found that these cattle had been unloaded in transit at Harrisburg and subsequent investigation showed that on the 20th of July a carload of southern cattle was un- loaded at the Harrisburg yards and were kept there about four hours. These cattle were unloaded on account of an injury to the car that they were in. They occupied a pen used in the usual course of the business of the yards. There is no pen at Harrisburg that is reserved for southern cattle. The cattle from Troy, Bradford County, occupied the yard at Harrisburg September 22; the first case occurred among the cows of this shipment October 7th and during the next few days 9 additional cases occurred. Steps were im- mediately taken to clean up and disinfect the Harrisburg stockyards. No further trouble occurred after this was done. RABIES. Rabies among dogs has occurred during the past year in the following named counties: Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Butler, Cambria, Carbon, Centre, Chester, Clearfield, Columbia, Crawford, Delaware, Fayette, Franklin, Indiana, Jefferson, Lancaster, Leb- anon, Lehigh, Luzerne, Mercer, Montgomery, Montour, Philadelphia, Schuylkill, Somerset, Susquehanna, Venango, Warren, Washington, Wayne, Westmoreland and York. 517 dogs died of rabies or were destroyed on account of exposure. 20 cattle and 5-horses died of ra- bies. 58 people were bitten by dogs that were known to have been rabid, of whom several died, presumably of rabies. General quar- antines were established covering all of the dogs of districts in the counties of Delaware, Fayette, Jefferson, Schuylkill, Somerset, Ve- nango and Westmoreland. Where it is possible to contre] an out- break of rabies by the quarantine of individual animals, known to have been exposed, this method is adopted. In some outbreaks, however, it is not possible to determine just what animals have been exposed and so, in order to include all of them, a general quarantine becomes necessary. The period of quarantine is usually 100 days. This period is selected because it covers the period of incubation in practically all cases. It may be that the period of incubation for rabies exceeds 100 days in from one to two per cent. in all cases. Statistics on this point vary somewhat, but this appears to be a fair statement. When the period of incubation exceeds 100 days it may run to several months, possibly for six or eight months. It would not be possible or proper to keep all dogs in quarantine for the max- imum period of incubation of eight months unless it were planned to entirely exterminate rabies in some large districts in accordance with the method developed and followed successfully in several Eu- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 111 ropean countries, and notably in England. The success of the Eng- lish authorities in completely exterminating rabies has been most instructive. It serves to demonstrate conclusively that rabies is not a disease that originates spontaneously, but that it is propagated wholly by infection from diseased animals. Of course it was not necessary to await the extermination of rabies in England from a long continued and long enforced muzzling order to come to these conclusions, but this added proof ought to be of some service in convincing ‘those people who hold aberrant views on rabies as to the accuracy of the conclusions ‘of veterinarians in regard to the modes of origin and distribution of this disease. Attention has been called in previous reports to the difficulty that has been ex- perienced in connection with the control of rabies as a result of the amazing views in regard to this disease that originate from unre- liable sources dnd that have been disseminated by some papers Fortunately, the newspapers have not given these false doctrines so much publicity as they formerly received. During the past year, however, statements have been circulated to the effect that there is no such ‘disease as rabies, or, if there is such a disease, that it is very rare and of little importance. These statements spring from people who claim to be interested in the welfare of animals and who en- deavor to convince the public that there is less harm in permitting rabies to run its course than in the measures that are adopted to check it. Such teachings are exceedingly dangerous, because they tend to disorganize public sentiment, to upset the views of poorly informed people as to the need for certain measures adopted for the purpose of repressing rabies, and they tend to retard people that are exposed to rabies from taking the precautions and treatment that may be necessary in order to enable them to escape infection. The question is sometimes asked: “Do you believe in rabies?” as though the question were one of philosophy or religion. It is as sensible to inquire: Do you believe in smallpox, or do you believe in wheat. The existence of one can be as completely demonstrated as the existence of the other. There is no more room for doubt as to the existence of rabies than doubt as to the existence of any other definite disease as measles or typhoid fever or any physical object. Rabies is a disease that occurs chiefly in dogs. It is characterized by a variable period of incubation, usually occurring within 12 to 30 days, by symptoms expressive of derangement of the nervous sys- tem and including some paralysis of the throat, by altered demeanor, irritability, a tendency to roam and, at times, to attack animals and people; at such times the animal may be overcome by an uncontrol- lable impulse to bite, but these paroxysms are intermittent. The disease terminates in most cases within five days. Death is preceded by great weakness and by local, and, later, by general paralysis. After death, certain well marked and highly characteristic altera- tions are found in the central nervous system. The disease is com- municable by inoculation with certain tissues or fluids of the dis- eased animal. Experiments have shown that the most virulent por- tions of the body are the central nervous system and the glands. The secretion from the salivary glands contains the infective prin- ciples of the disease and when saliva is implanted in a wound, as oe- curs when a rabid dog bites an animal or person, this implantation may result in the infection of the animal so exposed. All 112 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. animals or persons bitten by rabid dogs do not become infected for The reason that saliva is not always introduced into the wound. The secretion may be scanty, the mouth of the dog may be rather dry, the saliva may have been wiped from the teeth as they pass through clothing or through the outer layers of the skin; the infectious ma- terial may be washed from the wound by the flow of blood, or by efforts at cleansing or by sucking, or it may have been destroyed by the use of antiseptics. If a rabid dog bites a number of animals in quick succession, those last bitten are less exposed, because the in fectious material on the teeth of the dog is in smaller quantity. All animals, including man, have a certain amount of resistance to infec- tion by the virus rabies as by the virus of other diseases, hence a certain amount of virus may remain in the wound and still not pro- duce infection, because the minimum quantity that is required to in- fect that particular individual is not present. From these causes it results that only about 15 per cent. of the people bitten by rabid dogs are likely to develop rabies, even if not subjected to the Pasteur treatment. Of domesticated animals bitten by rabid dogs, a large percentage develop rabies approximately 50 per cent., and for the reason that the wound receives less careful tre: atment, and be- cause the bedy is not protected by clothing. Following infection from the bite of a rabid dog, at the expiration of the period of incubation, symptoms occur that are, practically, the same as those shown by the animal that conveyed infection. The, so called, anti-hydrophobists claim that people that develop rabies following the bite of a rabid dog are really infected with hysteria, from fear. This alleged explanation fails to account for the occur- rence of precisely the same condition in children or in infants who have no fear of rabies, and in animals. Early diagnosis is of the utmost importance in the control of this disease. Where it is suspected that an animal is afflicted with ra- bies and, particularly, if a person or other animal has been bitten, the suspected animal should be confined, and the course of the dis- ease should be observed. It is often possible to confine suspected dogs. If, however, the animal cannot be confined, it should be de- stroyed. The head should be removed with the two upper-most cer- vical vertebrae; these should be thoroughly wrapped in parchment paper, oil cloth or other impervious material, packed in ice, in a large bucket, covered over, and sent to.the Laboratory of the State Livestock Sanitary Board, corner 39th street and Woodland avenue, Philadelphia. If it is found that the animal was afflicted with rab- ies, a report to this effect is at once forwarded to the sender of the material, and measures are instituted to prevent the spread of rab- ies by animals that may have been exposed. It is possible now, by means of a microscopic examination, to de- termine, within a few hours, whether a given animal was afflicted with rabies, unless the animal was killed in the earliest stages of disease before there was a chance for the characteristic lesions to develop. The following report on the examination for rabies has been prepared by Dr. John Reichel, who has been in charge of this work for the State Livestock § Sanitary Board during the past 3 year: No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 113 “The following is a report with a summary of the facts brought out, in the examination of 248 animals for rabies. 5 g 3 2 3 3 = 3 2 3 na to = pe ° v ° ° & | @ Poi | a 18 2 | 170 5 1 7 1 2 6 tag eae ee 2 4 8 1 43 Wd HERR 15 9 9 206, or §3.1 per cent. positive diagnosis. 36, or 10.6 per cent. negative diagnosis. 6, or 6.3 per cent. result in doubt. As soon as a specimen for examination was obtained, where possi- ble, the following structures were taken for examination: the me- dulla oblongata, examined for Babes’ endothelial cell proliferation, the “rabid tubercle;” the gasserian ganglion and sympathetic gan- glion, examined for Van Gehuchten and Nélis’ proliferation changes, and the hippocampus major and cerebellum for the presence of Ne- geri bodies. A small portion of the cerebellum was saved in sterile glycerine for animal inoculation, where this was thought necessary. “In the examination of the 248 specimens, the diagnosis was made solely upon the presence or absence of proliferation changes in 113 cases. In 77, both the proliferation changes and Negri bodies were sought for. The diagnosis was based upon the presence or absence of Negri bodies alone in 49 cases. In 9 cases neither method was of value; the experimental animal inoculation method was here re- sorted to. “The recent date of the discovery and the announcement of the diagnostic value of the Negri bodies accounts for this method of diagnosis not being used in all cases. As is shown in the accom- panying table, the changes in the medulla oblongata namely, Babes’ endothelial cell proliferation or “rabid tubercle,” are not always re- liable and the Van Gehuchten and Nélis endothelial cell prolife- ration changes in the ganglion are at times found when rabies does not exist. This accounts for the omission in examining the struc- tures where these changes are usually found in many of the more recent specimens: “In positive cases of rabies: | | § A < ho od 6 % S | a FI oo S | = = | oD ° 2 | 2 ° 5 o 3 gs = Rog yb hom | E ~ ' n _~ | ro H z = = o a 2 | | | proliterition) changes; found In, . caec ss ccinwcincecscsces | 81, or *66.5 | 135, or *100 | 28, or *82.4 No proliferation changes found in, ..............cseeee0 by Aas OnFTB! OM evicieies oe ea ae ches : 6, or *18.6 *Per cent. 8—T—1906- 114 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. “In suspected cases of rabies (negative): ; 8 . qa — - Z Fl : : : 3 3 = 00 o 2 3 fo} c o 3 = = = 3 2 2, g ‘ E = | o a No proliferation changes found in, ...............+e0+++- 29, or *96.6 18, or *69.2 3, or *60 Prolifieration: changes) found in} “socsenessoancoocece cet: Lore 43:3 8, or *31.8 2, or *40 | | | | *Per cent. “In positive cases of rabies: | n at F Ee 2 SE a Rg 3 =e 5 q 6) | | INGE TINDOGIGS BLOT ore wie .0ie/eis's'e cicis oie bre) ololoinicininseraie cteisie opm nvavelaleicte lalate atelerelesisier> 91, or *97.9 93, or *99 OW ME ETL DOGLES LOMIG ANN, fa0i21-,s:s.civieicin cineleieh\alotelale trataitehe sts ete wletern eiateenetere eretneta 2,,0r *2.1 1vor et *Per cent. \ “In suspected cases of rabies (negative): ; : A, E E h 7 55 3 BE 4 Ha) is) | | Nownesri bodiess found: Anise oon wawiancenc see oe ee eee | 26, or #100 26, or *100 INSSTE IDOULES OME EAT os). 0/0.> sie 'ete aje(o sin ololgin'= vialele este alana ate orebs aie nisiats ere eietaitemaeTRe |sceccccccccences | cccuesenccccncs *Per cent. “From the table, the following conclusions may be drawn: In that it was impossible to find the changes described by Babes’ in 33.5 per cent. of the specimens of the medulla oblongata examined from positive cases of rabies, the changes in.this structure must be regarded as unreliable. In not a single positive case examined were the Van Gehucten and Nélis’ proliferation changes not found, but as the changes were found in several ganglia from cases not rabid, as proven in that the experimental animals inoculated failed to develop the disease and the absence in every case of the Negri bodies, shows that a diagnosis based entirely upon these changes must be guarded. The sympa- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 115 thetic ganglia were examined in many cases to determine their val- ue in the diagnosis of rabies by the presence or absence of the pro- liferation changes. The changes in the sympathetic ganglia were found to be more constant than the changes in the medulla oblon- gata but, like the changes in the gasserian ganglia, they were also found in several cases shown not rabid by experimental animal in- oculation and by the absence of Negri bodies. “Negri bodies were sought for in 126 cases, they were found in 99 and absent in 27. Where the Negri bodies were not found, experi- mental animal inoculations were always made, and it was learned that in two cases rabies developed in the experimental animals in- oculated, although Negri bodies were not found in the nervous 8ys- tem from which the experimental animals were inoculated. The history of these animals, however, shows that both were killed early in the course of the disease. “Of the many negative cases examined, including the 27 negative suspected cases and the nervous systems of healthy animals and animals dead of the diseases, Negri bodies have not been found in a single case. “The hippocampus major usually shows the Negri bodies in the greatest number but they are just as constantly present in the cerebellum when none were found in hippocampus major. Although the hippocampus major and cerebellum are the usual structure ex- amined for Negri bodies, they have been found in the olfactory lobes (quite numerous) cerebral cortex (not constant); medulla oblongata, gasserian and sympathetic ganglia and in the cervical region of the spinal cord. “Little work has been done in studying the nature of the Negri bodies outside of staining them and perfecting the method by which they can be demonstrated in the quickest way. “The smear method, published by Drs. Anna Williams and May Murray Lowden of the New York Board of Health, appears to be the most accurate and quickest way to demonstrate the bodies so far proposed. In no case where the Negri bodies were not found by the use of the smear method were they later found in sections made and stained from the various structures usually examined. By the use of this method, Negri bodies have been demonstrated in from 15 to 80 minutes. “To permit a suspected rabid animal to live and develop observa- ble clinical symptoms is quite as important in the making of a diag- nosis in the examination for Negri bodies as it has previously been shown when the proliferation changes were alone sought for. That the Negri bodies may be found earlier than the proliferation changes in the gasserian ganglion, may be true, but neither is found much earlier than the appearance of clinical symptoms.” HOG CHOLERA. -Hog cholera occurred during the past year in the following counties: Armstrong, Bedford, Blair, Berks, Brad- ford, Bucks, Centre, Columbia, Cumberland, Dauphin, Forest, Frank- lin, Lancaster, Lebanon, Jefferson, Luzerne, Lycoming, McKean, Montgomery, Perry, Susquehanna, Union, Venango, Westmoreland and York. The disease was not widely scattered in the counties in which it occurred excepting in Cumberland county, where 66 farms 116 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. were involved. The total number of farms in the State where hog cholera occurred was 118. As the herds of hogs were in all cases small the total losses were not large. 556 hogs were involved, and of these 290 died of cholera or were killed because they were diseased. The reason for the comparatively small prevalence of cholera dur- ing the year is that very few hogs have been brought to Pennsyl- vania from western points, excepting for immediate slaughter. It is now well understood that hegs are likely to be exposed to hog cholera in stock cars or in stockyards, and if they are kept a couple of weeks after shipment many of them would develop disease. There- fore, the hegs kept in Pennsylvania are nearly all of them grown in Pennsylvania and the hogs that are shipped in go to slaughter houses where they are promptly disposed of before they have an opportunity to develop cholera. So far as home grown hogs are concerned, there is practically no infection in the State. When the disease occurs the premises involved are quarantined and the quar- antine is maintained until the disease is abated, the exposed hogs slaughtered and premises disinfected. MANGE OF HORSES. A few cases of mange were discovered during the year among horses in the following named counties: Berks, Centre, Chester, Delaware, Juniata, Lackawanna, Lebanon, Montour and Philadelphia. The total number of cases reported was 40. In each case a quarantine was established with relation to the diseased horses and these horses were treated with the lime and sulphur wash until cured. This wash is made as follows LIME AND SULPHUR WASH FOR HORSES. Place one half pound of unslacked lime in a bucket or kettle. To this add enough water to form a paste. Into this paste, sift one and one half pounds of flours of sulphur and stir the mixture well. Place the sulphur-lime-paste in a kettle with about 3 gallons of water and boil. The boiling should be continued until the sulphur disap- pears, or almost disappears, from the surface, which will require from one to three hours. The solution is then of a chocolate or liver color. Water may be added as necessary. Pour the mixture and sediment inte a bucket and allow 2 or 3 hours for the sediment to settle, then carefully dip off the clear liquid taking care not to disturb the sediment. Place this liquid in a wood- en receptacle or keg that can be closed tightly to exclude air, or in a glass receptacle, such as a large demijohn. To the clear ‘liquid thus dipped off, add enough w ater to make six gallons. The sedi- ment should be trown away. This mixture can be used freely for washing the horse. As it stains the hands of the person using it (although it does not harm otherwise, and the stain does not last long) it may he applied with a sponge attached to the end of a stick. About one half of the body of the horse should be covered at a time; that is, on a single day, and the application should be repeated at intervals of 2 or three days so long as may be necessary. FORAGE POISONING OR CEREBRO SPINAL MENINGITIS OF HORSES. This disease occurred during the last year in many parts of the State. As it hag been difficult to get reports on its occurrence any statement as to its prevalence will be far from complete. Nu- Wor 7 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 117 merous complaints as to forage pee have come from the coun- ties of Adams, Cumberland, Lancaster, f Philadelphia, Wyoming and York. Geicrctevietstere cite ters ce lomo tron ratale 16 Hoopes Bros. & Thomas, ........ - Je eine Wissshe (GloWeSsiey Go ceasépdonas0Dodcur 600 RUE ECL fey trea atintn yoke loschace ts cuensisl co tassios wt oiokann st ohets Sprime i@ilys* ac sate acinsieelem eterno 2 Beri] PAOONME]E ca ercercienstateacs cele cine oyavele a elersiahele WiestiGroviey isc sacineeie macclesme cer 4 ye SPIRO CUL ITN acre elerciaiatterele we ciersie revere ersatinrere IES ah WMS CGN AE AA gecadoooadooOtn 1% *Grow berry or small ‘fruit plants only. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. Clearfield County. Name. Place. BU Pei ses VCE ENC ouee cnis cverevavsrate, sisversiereis eieisisfeie sfs.viere Clearmelde mec actccioe oe Crawford County. MEIN SENET AI Gisn coe cle,» asioe cisleisineye ccoees eves Gochranbon, mcs... ccn oe. ee *Anderson Bailey, R. D. No. 66, ........ GWoGhEAaMtOn en sn cee esis cise BIOS Dailey, chee INO S6G), scssce 2 sce s (Gloraligenaoroiy s-condoocEooe Srenrys toberts. Ro iD: INO. 665. .. occ sc COCRTATMEOI, Mis ctersiciesisielc ore ae we ECCCO Ete IDS INOS OG. creciereuslccloicis careers COCNEAN LOM yetatsa cies -rveltaret Savi Gecelbyny Eee IDs INO: 665, ss ccieeicces aoe CWOCHTATLOTMS raaactecieleletaieyore AKAM ES ILCs Setcia caente eles Sis fersisantls Stab fee we (Gra meshaurCin, Gaaoanaooococ SANTO L a OC OODECT s © atecisvele cs cis nlele opens eres Cochranton, <.-creccsie sso SAV VL ee ESA VINCI. haere sstesiae ears osicis tives oe COCHrAMNtON sa yee sieleeeles Showis sworzer, R..D. No: 33, of. .eseds< Gar iboreee 2052) eiciasicreratevelels eRe Weer. sete DS INOe UES Seve cioc ons on cccve ECA GWHTEN -scrctareticioomcre Eerugential Orchard: ‘Cosy ys ceo = aces cee Shermamnsville, ........0. RN dey IBYOSIS 7 Wi 0 Re a. i Se are een eae GENCVA,) ssiceowtas Suis cers etes SECA eNEAGSI hacsee tite cs otaes owes neh eels GSne Val. eels ve a teecsei sete ake SAV ATTIEy VV IOC a talisrs C etelerehevs ee esiatelain ewe eas see (GOTO Vai el ciate cterele tiles, ole Sele wtele SPM Ke STI Ke me starereleraie crevars © alcle ocloe eleceresetareic GENEVA 50 sale atoia: ste vo's sparstalazere Dee Ler AVVO Ch stare Aictaraso¥ersleYots siecle: sieves, sloieiacacave eo o' Gene Vay Cacrenisctociaclestervere's aie Neg Crem CAD YOM en ecracavaavote Ss tuselasers/ sel ciare™s cihnn'sieve (ETI VAs, ue cio sisters nile Ca srereiere BOD eM ME SCMMCU. crelarisclciejeise cisisieles s «tec sa INET. Be oagegacaoooGcGG =Petervochatiner, yD. NOs, wn... 0). a6 VIS RIVINTOR: vr rerereretefeiereicisistetere SUTRAS eT mETS WTI, avajeve/erals c.sisieue Sietereleie.s 6 vahecse COCHrANEOM Sicosctclefosis cl *Samuel Bailey, R. D. No. 66, .......... COCHrantOny Weicic <1 \ M@inbures- sac tite. tae stomateiawternerne il PSUR ZA TOSS I8 ox ers esistoretontreretesssares, oro etelsic sejeleincoreve INGW: (Castle, | ccs. ciecc cleanse cieroletie’e sete 1 NEES. a INPOOTE St Siar ieisieaicloe wisitisiave eo late etarere ele stescve INe@wW "'CAaStle , i icwsiacisteriewie sNesisinierite 2 ES) Pea VV IS ET ae verccarcveens oreverelonatetacata eyerencata eisietels Neue MiNsibomihslertona Baysoqesoa coun oc 1 SAIS Roa SiS ES no bo oe DOOR OOADOU on ebo oC New Wilminetomy sicc. cman clerceie sate % FEPOVER DLOGs. Eves INO. OSdasinisietinenesterts New; Walinaita SOM ye cre sree ones eleneteter= 2 Lehigh County. SW, Sams SON MNSON | cous ayrac nese cetetostarererloets AMIENPONV I. wwe olsinmiore sexeleerenn ate etre 30 Luzerne County. PVA PIPES es arcs covsiascie aisles etalon atieiers Webi te: FELAVieTay Pe clerertecs oolelcieisrsisreumiatnte (Handles only native ornamental shrubs.) Ve AG ITA LRC Lita re ya cisisistelescloinieletabelsr cles eielatcietele: sia Wilkes-Barre y sr wste cies icisicisies alerernie 1 Lycoming County. Eivenden Br0sS., oc .eccscsesecssccevcce cece Williamsport, <.65 0.5 ce eeccssc cms 2 Mercer County. *George E. Brocklehurst, R. D. No. 20, Jackson Centre, ................ ; 214 ARG tShueswekssgs lily Gaoe Goon sooDocoOGUOOE SCOMEHODBOy Letras erecate eres oot sveevevalareetare 2 *J. HE. Brocklehurst, R. D. No. 3, ........ IMMER COR Cale stel roe ecelsie wareentnte sisteists 1% Se WW ee ie te NUD opal s ReDie IM Op UE ayaa IMieeGie. déhGocdebastednduosUeLaOORE 10 SNES. GlSt. IM eSEVOM 6 ccsrete avarersielsleletetelelele SPOMESDOTO Se a rte ord cents euete teeters 1% Saris awe nroste okt. Di INO 205. selene JACKSONU-CEMERCE . cyateusmiersjeloherore sualanee % SEAM WV C CHAT EM Ay cateiwiens clejcieiaisise/srarelaiete eiurele SLONOWOLO wok ies we creole specie insel sis ele ere 2 EAA aTI ee RO WILG Grae treretay a stejsietatalefe. sie tei osnis Contre eauleXe StOmMPGDOrO® Wacicicvarrctetrorrataa iets eeinerar ate 4% RCV EVE TOILE Ss ciate racclersle ds stiles ale heim eeioels she Stoneboros 2 Siac een sae eos 1% = OhlaMET eT SON! af carsis visas ceaia ane select wie Stone bonOnice. seitenmewinc ccm aimee 1 SVacop Mromean), et. Ds NiO. 2250 se cencic'seiee SHONSDOTO, Va.ciacies oe, teihieesrewleeenle 1 MUG MMbeaey GaaocOanne JObeUDEeGgoDOUdOas SEONEDONG, Hare sajelosystayelecevereles, Mae 4% *Grow berry or small fruit plants only. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 147 Name. Place. Acres SEP DEP UODOVIC. ce eis dclele es cicic cee cisivics en vsies SF eetavs| 01015, 05, BAGO OOD eTCOCR ECO RIOrCeC MENG VEC Clar eM < ayeies-c cic sieves cae eeie'e'e ss SEOMEWOLO oi ecin s.ctolaue sujsleuelersicts siete = cio 1% See Memean, RD. NO. 46. ciisierca cscs GERECTEWLG so ci ays ntecctoieia vcloteles a sererereres ster 4 See Ty ETON tet Toe INOS 28's tia crale.c:o(s:siaialet Biahioiie, SoSP Gee COREA Orr ae 21% ee OO bDIETIGs SONS, Roel NOL sss i. EtaAGley sc cscs oct eles cle eleleisies 4 URAL S DAybOr ve bts: ID. IN O84, vice %16 c1cle we.0ie PSTN ONY ot eters conv cheval -A:*-Heiss,. J: D. Herr, C.. -C.- Bess,” James* Bippless GC. Kanffman,~ -R:- FE: ee,” A 24 B,-Lehman, sh ee D. K. McMillan, C. F. Noll, J. K. Owen, W. B. Packard, W. E. Per- ham, M. E. Shay, H. F. Shugars, M. H. Snavely, A. W. Stephens, G. P. Stevens, W. G. Winner and W. H. Wolff. It has not been possible to inspect in all the counties of this State, owing to the fact that enough men to do the work and suf- ficient funds to put a man into each county are not available, but inspections have been made and demonstrations given in most counties where the scale is found, as follows: Inspection and Demonstration. Adams, Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Bedford, Berks, Blair, Bradford, Bucks, Cambria, Carbon, Centre, Chester, Clearfield, Clin- ton, Columbia, Crawford, Cumberland, Dauphin, Delaware, Erie, Fayette, Forest, Franklin, Fulton, Huntingdon, Indiana, Juniata, Lackawanna, Lancaster, Lebanon, Lehigh, Lycoming, Mercer, Mif- flin, Monroe, Montgomery, Montour, Northampton, Northumberland, Perry, Philadelphia, Schuylkill, Snyder, Sullivan, Susquehanna, Un- ion, Washington, Westmoreland, Wyoming and York. Inspections made but no demonstrations held. Butler, Clarion, Elk, Greene, Jefferson, Lawrence, Luzerne, Pike, Somerset, Tioga, Venango, Warren and Wayne. That this work has been highly valuable in helping to save the crops, especially in the orchards of this State, there is no doubt. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 161 This is attested by the hundreds of letters we have received from persons who claim from hundreds to thousands of dollars worth of property saved for the writers by the assistance of this office. It is highly gratifying to know that our work is giving such good re- sults. It should be continued but on a more extensive scale, and to do this properly an adequate appropriation should be made by the next Legislature. 6. INSPECTIONS GF IMPORTED PLANTS, SEEDS AND FRUITS. Owing to the liability of insects that are very destructive in other States or counties to be brought into this State at any time on im- ported trees, shrubs, seeds or fruits, it is important that inspec- ‘tions should be made of such importations. We are in readiness to inspect them when it is possible to do so, but there is great difficulty in learning of the importations, as the importers and transportation companies do not send the desired information to this office. It is to be hoped that some plan can be evolved by which it will be nec- essary for importers and transportation companies to notify our Department of importations of trees, shrubs, plants and seeds from other States, especially from foreign countries, in order that they can be inspected to prevent the introduction of such serious pests as the Black Scale, the West Indian Peach Scale, the Gypsy Moth, the Brown-tail Moth, and other exceedingly destructive pests which are not at present found in this State, but which are liable to be brought within our borders at any time and prove more des. tructive than any pest we now have if due vigilance be not taken to prevent it. 7. MAKING COLLECTIONS. We must have collections for comparison and further study of the distribution of insects, life histories, habits, economic effects, enemies, etc., in order to give us keys to practical methods of treat- ing beneficial and injurious insects and other animal organisms. We receive many specimens for name and classification, with re- quests for detailed information concerning them. They can not be given readily in many cases, because they are broken or in imper- fect condition of preservation or immature, but when we have in our own collections properly preserved specimens for comparison with the others sent to us, they generally can be named even from frag- ments. The name is the key to the literature, and the literature is the basis of the life history studies and may indicate practical ex- periments and remedies. We can not possibly conduct the work of this office properly without such named collections. Also, in mak- ing collections we must study not only the injurious insects them- selves, but the predacecous insects, which feed upon them, the internal parasites which attack them, and the enemies of other kinds which devour them or destroy them. While the time of no one person has been given exclusively or even mostly to make collection, we have collected when possible and have lost no opportunity to preserve such specimens as contri- butors have sent and which are desired to aid in our stu- dies. The collections made during the past year amounted to three thousand, five hundred and eighty, and the accession numbers in our 152 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. catalog reached from 4,849 to 8,428 inclusive. Asin most cases there were several specimens in one collection and under one number, this means that our collections for the year stand for hundreds of thousands of individual specimens, and in truth thousands of spe- cies. We now for the first time have enough specimens to make ex- changes by which we can procure needed material to illustrate economic features of insects and animals which we have not col- lected, but which will prove of importance to the work of this office, enabling us to become familiar with such creatures before they are imported into this State, to be able to know them by sight while they are yet comparatively rare, and thus have the means of sup- pressing them before loss is sustained by them. While our collections have not been made for the purpose of put- ting them on exhibition, but rather to make a working cabinet, they will be a useful nucleus for ourselves and others for making inves- tigations along zoological and especially entomological lines. How- ever, we have enough good material to form an important and very attractive nucleus of an agricultural or educational museum, and in many features this collection is not duplicated in this or any other State. It would require a great deal of money to procure by purchase, the material which we have, by persistent effort of our- selves and others, been able to accumulate. I deem it important that this office be able to co-operate with the State Museum to some extent, especially the Zoological section of said museum, and be con- nected with it in such a way as to utilize without further expense to the State, the specimens we have collected, and the expert scientific service which can be rendered by myself and assistants. Acknowledgment should be made of the intense interest and ef- ficient services of some of my assistants, inspectors and demonstra- tors, who have taken every possible spare moment of their own time in aiding to make and preserve collections. For example, Satur- day afternoons are invariably considered in other offices as belong- ing to the employes for their recreation or private affairs, when they are free from duty. However, many of my assistants have almost invariably taken Saturday afternoons, summer and winter, for making collections or preparing specimens. In fact, most of our specimens have been collected by such persons and at such time. In due acknowledgment of such faithful application I should make special mention of the work of Mr. A. F. Satterthwait, Mr. D. K. McMillan, Mr. P. H. Hertzog, Mr. W. R. Walton, Mr. W. R. McCon- nell, Mr. Harold O. Marsh, Mr. F. Z. Hartzell and Mr. Paul R. My- ers. I should also take this opportunity to express my high appre- ciation and thanks to the public, especially to those individuals who have sent us many specimens, and whose contributions haves been acknowledged with thanks in the various numbers of our Monthly Bulletins. It is greatly to be desired that such contribu- tions be continued, and acknowledgments will be made in detailed manner in the Monthly Bulletin. 8. DEMONSTRATIONS OF METHODS OF COMBATING PESTS. The practical citizens of this State have made requests to be “shown”. In other words they have not only desired information in the saving of their crops, but have requested that we show them, by demonstrations, the methods of making and applying the materials | that will give good results. As a consequence, we commenced the No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 138 work of giving demonstrations in making and applying the Lime- sulphur Wash for the San José Scale. These were given at inter- vals of four or five miles, in infested orchards, and announced both by the local papers and by large posters. The attendance was good ranging from ten to five hundred persons, and an average of about thirty. Hundreds of such demonstrations were given in this State by our inspectors and demonstrators, and reports are now arriving showing that they were of immense value in helping to save trees which were otherwise doomed to speedy destruction. Now that the persons living in the vicinity of such infested but sprayed orchards can see the beneficial results of this work, they are encouraged to go forward by the same methods and save their property. The immense possibilities of public demonstrations as applied to preserving crops from insect enemies and fungous diseases are such that we feel justified in arranging to take an orchard in each of the fruit producing counties, and make it the scene of demonstration for all the insecticidal and fungicidal operations that are needed through the year to keep the trees and fruit in proper condition. This appeals so strongly to the practical citizen that we have al- ready received many letters asking us to start such demonstration orchards. and we have promised to do so in case proper provisions are made for the expense of the same by the next Legislature. While this office has pressed forward in active and conscientious work in behalf of this Commonwealth during the past year, there may have been some mistakes made, some things left undone that might have been undertaken, and some things imperfectly accom- plished. However, we are satisfied that important service has been rendered that has more than justified the expense of the year. We are at all times open to suggestions and recommendations by in- terested persons, and are only too glad to have the opportunity to be of further service along the lines already mentioned or on subjects of such other kinds as may be possible in the general field of zo- ology. We have had many requests to name weeds or plants, and espec- ially to give the names and remedies for fungous diseases, but we prefer to stay strictly in the realm of Zoology, of which Entomology is an important branch, and refer questions on other subjects to specialists in their respective lines. With almost no exception, the press of this State has been in close sympathy with our work, publishing reports of our meetings, reports concerning demonstrations and lectures, abstracts from Bulletins and favorable comment upon the labors we have under- iaken and are trying to make useful and of practical interest. In conclusion [ desire to express my high appreciation of the faithful support of the State Administration and yourself, Mr. Secretary, without which discouragements would have been too great for us to accomplish more than a small fraction of what this office really has done throughout the past year. I hope to find it possible to make the office even more useful during the present year than the past, and to secure the continued co-operation of my faithful assis- tants, the citizens of the State, the Press, my fellow officers in the Department of Agriculture and the Administration. Respectfully submitted, H. A. SURFACE. Economie Zoologist. 7 11 ( 154 ) PROCEEDINGS OF THE FARMERS’ NORMAL INSTITUTE, AND State Board of Agriculture, Court House, Clearfield, Pa., MAY 29-31, 1906. = - “(185 ) (166 ) OFFICIAL DOCUMENT, No. 7. PROCEEDINGS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE, AT A MEETING HELD IN THE COURT HOUSE, CLEARFIELD, PA., TUESDAY, MAY 29, 1906. ORDER OF BUSINESS. Call to order at 10.00. . Roll-call of Members. Reading of Minutes. . Appointment of Committee on Credentials. . Reception of Credentials of New Members and Delegates. . Report of Committee on Credentials. . Unfinished Business. . New Business. i . Miscellaneous Business. toe Py FOO: A Oe OV i RS et . Adjournment. Court House, Clearfield, Pa., Tuesday, May 29, 1906, 10 A, M. First Vice President Fenstermaker in the Chair. The CHAIR: The first thing in order will be the calling of the roll by the Secretary. The Secretary called the roll, and the following answered to their names: Messrs. A. I. Weidner, J. S. Burns, S. S. Blyholder, A. L. Me- Kibben E. KE. Chubbuck, H. J. Krumenacker, John A. Woodward, M. E. Conard; S. X. McClellan, J. W. Nelson, J. A. Herr, A. P. Young, J. F. Seavy, R. M. Heyburn, C. B. Hege, R. M. Kendall, Geo. G. Hutchison, S. M. McHenry, W. L. McCracken, Matthew Rodgers, Horace Seamans, W. H. Brosius, Samuel McCreary, P.S. Fenster- maker, A. J. Kahler, W. C. Black, M. M. Naginey, J. Sexton, I. A. Eschbach, A. T. Holman, H. H. Hall, W H. Stout, Jacob S. Miller, EK. R. Warburton, E. E. Tower, J. Newton Glover, M. N. Clark, D. A. Knuppenburg, G. F. Barnes and N. B. Critchfield, Secretary. The CHAIR: The minutes of the last meeting will be read by the Secretary. (157) 158 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doé. The Secretary read the minutes of the last meeting and they were adopted as read. The CHAIR: The Chair appoints the following gentlemen as a Committee on Credentials: Hon. J. A. Herr, of Clinton; M. M. Nag- iney, of Mifflin; J. S. Burns, of Allegheny; R. M. Kendall, of Ful- ton, and W. C. Black, of Mercer, who will meet at the call of the Chairman. Those having credentials for admission to this body will please come forward and present them to the Chairman of the committee. While the Committee on Credentials is in session and preparing their report, if anybody desires to make a few remarks, we will be glad to hear from him at this time. No one volunteering any remarks, the Chair declared a recess until the Committee on Credentials was ready to report. After Recess. The CHAIR: The Committee on Credentials has announced, through its Chairman, that it is now ready to report. The report will now be read. REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON CREDENTIALS. The Chairman of the Committee on Credentials, the Hon. J. A. Herr, read the report of the committee as follows: Clearfield, May 29, 1906. The Committee on Credentials make the following report: Lehigh County Agricultural Society sends the credentials of Mr. P. 8S. Fen- stermaker, of Allentown, Pa., to represent them on the State Board of Agriculture. Also, Centre County Agricultural Association sends the creden- tials of Mr. John A. Woodward, of Howard, Pa., to represent them on the State Board of Agriculture, in both cases, commencing Janu- ary, 1906. We find the above named credentials in regular form and recom- mend that the gentlemen be seated. - (Signed.) J. A, HERR, M. M. NAGINEY, J. 8S. BURNS, | R. M. KENDALL, J W. C. BLACK. - MR. HERR: Mr. Chairman, I move that the gentlemen named be seated as members of the Board. The motion having been duly seconded, and the question put, it was agreed to. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 159 The CHAIR: The next thing in order is Unfinished Business. MR. McHENRY: Mr. Chairman, I move you that we reconsider the vote by which we passed the report of the Legislative Com- mittee at our last session, and when in order, I will give you my reasons for making this motion. The CHAIR: You have heard the motion; are there any remarks? MR. McHENRY: My reason for making this motion—it is only my own idea; perhaps no one else will agree with me, but my idea is that we made a mistake when we approved the proposition that all license fees be retained in the counties in which they are col- lected. I think under the existing conditions, that it was a mis- take. I have not the figures to give you, but I will say, generally, that almost nine-tenths of the license fees are paid from counties in which the large cities are located, and are not our agricultural counties as a rule, and it takes that much money out of the State Treasury to which we must look for appropriations for schools, and for the improvement of our roads, and so on, and is scattered all over the other counties and all over the State. It may be a little selfish, perhaps it is; I don’t know, but it may be so regarded, for Philadelphia, Pittsburg and those large cities, to throw their money into the State Treasury, as is usually done. In my own county, license fees do not amount to very much, for it is almost altogether an agricultural county, and I venture the assertion that what is true there, is true in two-thirds of the coun- ties in the State, if not three-fourths, and these are my reasons for making this motion; I merely want to know what the feeling of the members is. There being no further discussion, the question was put by the Chair and agreed to. MR. McHENRY: Mr, Chairman, I now move you to strike out the words “and the license fees.” I move to amend that report by striking out those words. A member called for the reading of that portion of the report as adopted. The Secretary read as follows: “We further recom- mend the enactment of the law whereby the personal taxes should be retained in the counties in which they are assessed, thereby re- lieving our overburdened taxation.” MR. HERR: I second the motion on the amendment. As I under- stand, the motion to reconsider prevailed, and the question before us now is on the adoption of the amendment. MR. CLARK: Mr. Chairman, in reference to the personal tax, about all our personal tax is retained in the county. I do not think we send any tax out of the county except the State tax. Do not let us go on record and do anything here that is not right. It seems to me that the only tax we send out of the county is the State tax. Now the query with me is, whether the matter of the State tax is included as a personal tax. If you concede that that is a personal tax, of course that weuld include it; that is what I want to know. 160 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. MR. McHENRY: I did not include that in this motion. I thought it would come up in this discussion and I am anxious to have in- formation on that myself—what is meant by that personal tax— whether it is a tax on money and personal property or just what it is that is paid into the State Treasury; if it is included, then I will include it in my motion to amend. The CHAIR: There is a member of the Legislature in this body; probably he can enlighten us along this line. MR. BROSIUS: Mr. Chairman, the personal property tax is paid now into the State Treasury, and our contention has been as agricul- turists that we should retain that in our counties. I believe that our money at interest is personal property, and it should be, we think, retained at home. That has been my view. We pay no State tax to-day except a personal property tax, and that is properly money. The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, will you allow me to inquire, through the Chairman, whether any part of that tax is returned to the counties now, or whether it is all returned to the counties? MR. BROSIUS: I think there is a portion of it only returned to the counties. And now our contention, as to this resolution, if I am right—it is intended that it should be all returned. With our immense State revenue, it seems to me that should be done. The SECRETARY: I understood Mr. Clark to ask the question whether it is not all returned to the counties now. MR. CLARK: Mr. Chairman, what I spoke of was our personal taxes. Now money—the tax on money is not the only personal tax that we pay. We pay plenty of personal tax that never goes into the State funds at all. My query was this: What part of this tax do we want to include in this? It seems to me that we should amend it so as to include that part of the personal tax that is now paid into the State Treasury. MR. HERR: Mr. Chairman, make that “personal property tax” and that will cover it, will it not? The SECRETARY: If that were made “personal property tax” and the other should follow immediately after the words “personal property tax,” the words “that are now paid into the State Treas- ury,” that would make that very plain because that would be the tax assessed upon money at interest and nothing else. Now while you are amending this report, while the amendments are being con- sidered, you can insert that, and that will make it all right and make it plain. MR. KAHLER: Mr. Chairman, in regard to the question of the money returned to the counties, the object of this recommendation was that we retain it all in the counties. Now it seems to some of us that it is hardly worth while to pay money in and get money back. Why not leave it in? A great many of us think we are overburdened with taxation; that would help to balance it. We No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 161 | have been trying to get some redress for local purposes and for some reason we have not been able to secure it. Now while we cannot get a whole loaf, our object was to get a little, and I for my part, am emphatically opposed to striking that out. I believe that there is a large sentiment in this State in favor of a proposition of that kind, that it all be retained in the county. MR. BROSIUS: Mr. Chairman, I suppose that the gentleman must have misunderstood me. What I meant to be understood was, that I believed the State could well afford to do without it, with its im- mense revenue, and that it should be retained in the county, and the change, as I understand it, that this gentleman wishes, is that the license fees, etc., should be retained in the county. My contention as a farmer is, has been, and is to-day, that we as farmers want to have ail the benefit of all the money that is out at interest in our districts, and therefore that should not be changed. But it is a question with them there now. Of the license money collected, it is divided, and a certain amount goes to the county, a certain amount to the State and a certain other amount to the townships, but I really cannot specify the amount. Possibly the gentleman is right in regard to the distribution. Philadelphia and Pittsburg are large cities and have a great deal of license money, but I would not like to go on record as to that, but I think that the State with its vast income can afford} not only to let us have that, but to let us have a lot more. MR. BOND: Mr. Chairman, I think that the proposition to re- tain the license tax in the county is very meritorious. I live in a county where the liquor license costs hundreds of thousands of dollars, and I believe that we should receive every dollar of that license back to help us to pay the expense of criminal cases that cost us hundreds of thousands of dollars that have to be paid out of our county treasury. MR. McHENRY: Mr. Chairman, my sole object in having this sent to the State Treasury, is simply to equalize that money that comes from a traffic that does no one any good, and the only way you can equalize that over the State, is to let it go into the State Treasury, that comes from these counties that have been spoken of. I know that we do not get from Brother Bond’s county, but we get this element that a bad influence has been exerted upon, from those counties, and we get that out in our agricultural coun- ties, where we do not have much of that kind of a thing, and the only way we can get our share of it is to have it go into the State Treasury first and then have it paid back for road and school pur- poses. I am not certain that Tam right; I think there is a certain portion paid to boroughs, whereas the townships in which a licensed hotel is located, receives very little benefit, I think that is the idea, as I understand it. The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, that is correct. MR. McHENRY: Now take it in my own county. We do not have but one licensed hotel that gives anything to the township, they are only in the boroughs and only in the cities, as a rule in 11—7—1906. 162 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. other counties, and I believe we make a mistake when we recom- mend our taking this fund and returning it again. As I said be- fore, it may be slightly selfish, but I feel that it is doing no harm to get from the State all that we can get from the agricultural people. As I said, it may be slightly selfish to want to draw this large amount that comes from Philadelphia and Pittsburg and all those large cities that goes into the State Treasury. Now if we recommend this, and the Legislature passes it, it is done at the recommendation of the agriculturists themselves, and takes money away from them, as I know we do not have a very large amount compared with what we need. I thought it would be wise to take this up in order that it might be fully discussed. MR. KAHLER: Mr. Chairman, I wish to say this, that while the gentleman objects to the money being retained in the boroughs and cities, he must recollect that we are not the only people that sacrifice. A great many people pay some of the taxes in these towns. As a rule, our towns are paying a heavier local tax than we are. Now why not retain that? The State is not in absolute need of it by any means; the revenues of the State are immense, and in a great many boroughs it is a material help to their local taxation to have this amount of money retained in their counties, and I think we should have it, for the traffic which costs thousands of dollars every year to defend criminal cases—that grows out of this traffic, and from which we get very little benefit. MR. MILLER: Mr. Chairman, that don’t really benefit the agri- cultural part of the county at all. We have in Somerset county probably three townships that have licensed houses and that pay a very small amount into the county treasury or into the State Treas- ury and I think fifty per cent. is returned. That amounts to very little in a township, and it is the boroughs where the licenses are paid and returned to them, that get the benefit, while the rural dis- tricts which help to keep up the saloons—they send their boys in to drink—and there is no return except misery. MR HERR: Mr. Chairman, I think it is a misapprehension to talk about selfishness. I do not think that the benefits should be confined to the cities and boroughs instead of our rural districts, if benefits flow from these license taxes. I know that in our county we do not get a bit of it; the share of it that goes into the State Treasury should benefit us and I think we can with propriety ask for an increased appropriation for our school and road funds. It does not help us to pay costs of these criminal cases either. It is retained there as a borough fund, really, and not as a county fund. It is returned there, as I understand it, into districts in which the licensed houses are located; if that is so, it don’t benefit our rural districts. Now it is an immense fund and I do not think you need to consider the interests of the boroughs and cities. I think they are quite able to take care of themselves. MR. BOND: Mr. Chairman, isn’t it the object of this motion to remedy that defect? Is it not the intention of that amendment to have the money refunded to the county treasurer? The resolution that has been passed in all meetings that I ever had any interest in No. Uc DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 163° and the efforts that have been made in the Legislature, to have that law passed, with the intention of having it returned to the county treasury, and not having it returned pro rata to the townships and boroughs as the division is made now, is what I understand to be sought. . MR. MILLER: The resolution says that the whole of it is to be returned. MR. BOND: To the county? MR, MILLER: It would have to be returned to the place where it originated. MR. HERR: My understanding is that it is to be retained rather than returned. A Member: Mr. Chairman, would it not be well now to appoint a committee to get this in proper shape before decisive action is taken, rather than to go ahead and say something that will not sound well after you have said it. The CHAIR: Are you ready for the question on the amendment to the report? MR. CLARK: Mr. Chairman, will you kindly have the amend- ment read so that it will be understood? The CHAIR: Will the Secretary please read the part desired? The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, the report of the committee as it now stands under consideration reads as follows: “We further recommend the enactment of a law whereby the personal taxes and the license fees should be retained in the counties in which they are assessed, and thereby relieve our overburdened taxation.” The motion to amend was to strike out the four words “and the license fees” so that if the amendment passes it will read as fol- lows: “We further recommend the enactment of a law whereby the personal taxes should be retained in the counties in which they are assessed and thereby relieve our overburdened taxation.” MR. SEXTON: Mr. Chairman, as I understand it, that resolution has already passed and we are discussing it after it has passed. The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, for the benefit of Brother Sexton, through the Chair, let me say that the motion was to re- consider the vote by which the report was adopted and that motion prevailed, so that now this report is before us just as it was orig- inally, and then the brother from Indiana county offered the amendment. MR. BROSIUS: Mr. Chairman, if we adopt this amendment, it would stand in regard to licenses the same as it is to-day. Then we say nothing about the licenses and unless we would have legis- lation it would remain exactly as it is; that is my understanding of it, 164 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, that is correct; the amendment will leave it just as it is now; the amendment as offered refers only to the liquor licenses. The CHAIR: Is there any further discussion? _There appearing to be none, the Chair put the question, and a via voce vote was taken which left the Chair in doubt as to the result, whereupon a rising vote was taken, the question being on the amendment to strike out the designated words, and the motion was lost. The CHAIR: Now the question is on the adoption of the report of the committee. Those who are in favor of same will say aye, op- posed no; it is carried. The CHAIR: Is there any more unfinished business? If not, we will go on to New Business. The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, under the head of New Busi- ness there is a matter that I would like to submit to the Board, and that is this: The act of Assembly provides that the election of officers shall take place on the fourth Wednesday of January at their meeting at Harrisburg each year. It has been customary to meet on Tuesday preceding the first Wednesday in January—am I right about that? MR. HERR: Wednesday. The SECRETARY: It has been customary, with but one excep- tion, to meet on the fourth Wednesday of January. There are some people who want to hold their meetings at the same time; for in- stance, the State Live Stock Breeders’ Association, in whose work we are all interested, and the State Dairy Union would like to hold their meeting the same week in order that they may have the ad- vantages of the lecturers employed by the State Board, and that we may have the advantage of their lecturers employed by them, but if we meet on Wednesday, there would be only left four days of the week. They came to me and asked if we could arrange to begin our meeting on Tuesday, so that they might have a part of the time during the week, and I said to them in reply that it was not a matter for me to decide. I shall be plcased to have the matter taken up by the State Board or by the Executive Committee and I shall be glad to follow their instructions. I shall be pleased if the State Board or the Executive Committee will take some action in regard to this matter. I have had requests from the Dairy Union and also from the State Live Stock Breeders’ Association asking that we begin our meeting on Tuesday. If we do we will have to put off the election of officers until the second day of our meeting. Those of you who were present then, know how we got along. This is a matter for you to consider now. The CHAIR: You have heard the suggestion of the Secretary. Is there any motion? MR. CLARK: Mr. Chairman, this matter has been mentioned to me quite frequently. Men who are very much interested in this question have spoken to me about it, and I can assure you that I No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 165 heartily wish that this convention may place it within the power of the Executive Committee or of the Secretary himself to call a meeting of the State Board of Agriculture on Tuesday, so as to give room for the other meetings to follow, and I do not know but it would be proper to make a motion to that effect to call a meeting on Tuesday. MR. SEXTON: Mr. Chairman, does not the law fix the time when the meeting of the State Board of Agriculture is to take place? The SECRETARY: My impression of the matter is that the law says that the election of officers shall take place on the fourth Wednesday of January, at the annual meeting of the Board in the city of Harrisburg. I do not think that there is anything in the act of Assembly that prohibits our going into session on Tuesday only so that we are in session on Wednesday when the election must take place. A Member: Mr, Chairman, has the State Board any by-laws? The SECRETARY: I believe that the State Board does not have any written by-laws. Secretary Edge, I think, at the last annual meeting made the statement that there are no written by-laws. MR. HERR: Mr. Chairman, I think we have certain by-laws to regulate our admission and so on; but I think the Secretary is mis- taken in his stating that the law creating the Board of Agriculture simply says that we must hold our election on Wednesday; I think it says that the Board shall convene on the fourth Wednesday in January at which time the annual election shall be held. We could hold the election on Thursday if we wanted to, but that is the date fixed for our meeting. I do not know that there is anything in the law to prohibit us from having a special day; but I know this, that inasmuch as the State Board of Agriculture is the recognized body of the State to hold these meetings, and the other Associations are not State associations, we should not divide up all our time and give too much of it to other organizations. We have now at our dis- position a fund to pay for our annual meeting and to secure lec- turers, and we are willing that that fund shall go to a certain ex- tent where our friends want it to go in the line of stock breeding, dairying, and so on, that are so closely connected with the line of ‘agriculture, and that is as appropriate to our work as it is to theirs, but I am opposed to cutting up any part of the time that should properly belong to our meeting. I won’t oppose the motion to meet on Tuesday, but I shall oppose the motion to adjourn before the evening session on Wednesday. Sometimes some of us have to miss some of those sessions; it has been customary for the trus- tees of the college to meet on Tuesday evening preceding the meet- ing of the Board of Agriculture because a good many of the trus- tees are members of the Board of Agriculture and are interested in the meetings of the Board of Agriculture. The suggestion was that we adjourn Wednesday afternoon and give them Wednesday even- ing and Thursday. I do not see why their meeting cannot convene on Thursday morning instead of taking part of the one day that the law requires the Board of Agriculture to meet. 166 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. _MR. BLACK: Mr. Chairman, I think that the Pennsylvania Live Stock Breeders’ Association would be entirely satisfied to come in on Thursday. I do not think it is their wish to limit the meetings of the State Board of Agriculture at all. The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, I would state that they made that request as stated by Brother Herr. It is very interesting to the live stock breeders to attend the meetings of the State Board of Agriculture, and possibly it might be of interest to some mem- bers of the State Board to attend the meetings of the Live Stock Breeders’ Association. The Secretary will be satisfied with either arrangement; I can’t see that there is any material difference whether we listen to an address or to several addresses delivered under the auspices of the Live Stock Breeders’ Association or whether under the auspices of the State Board of Agriculture. We are all interested in the same line, and that is why we are good friends. The Breeders’ Association look at it in this way. They will have their lecturers there, and we will have ours, and both organizations can have the same men in some instances, but it is a matter of entire indifference to me as to whether we shall allow them to begin their meetings on Wednesday or not. If we begin ‘en Tuesday, we shall have all day Tuesday and Tuesday night and also two sessions on Wednesday; we will be able to have four or five sessions; then they would like to come in on Wednesday even- ing and continue through Thursday and that would give the Dairy Union people an opportunity to get in with their work, so that those ‘who are there as members of the State Board would have an oppor- tunity to attend their lectures right along the same line. I do not know that we have had a better presentation of live stock breeding than we had at our last meeting. I feel just a little bit like Brother Herr the State Board is a State institution and we can do as we please about this matter. Perhaps we will be conceding a little too much to give them the Wednesday evening meeting, but we must remember that the differ- ent sessions are made up, as it were, for the benefit of the same family, or for the same object. MR. HERR: Mr. Chairman, the holding of a meeting on Wed- -‘nesday evening would be a benefit to the Breeders’ Association be- cause they have no funds except their annual dues, while we have a fund which is to be devoted to our work; we cannot appropriate that to the Breeders’ Association or any other, although while it: would really lessen their burden to have a meeting on Wednesday evening, I do not know that it would increase our own. It is a little ‘difficult ta get there for a Tuesday morning’s session. Such an ar- rangement would leave two days, Friday and Saturday, to go home on, and only one day to come on, and it seems to me they can just as easily extend the time. MR. ORR: Mr. Chairman, Iam not a member of this Board, and it has never been my privilege to attend a winter meeting of the State Board of Agriculture, but I would like to say here to the State Board of Agriculture that I think that instead of feeling that these other organizations in the State of Pennsylvania are infringing in any way upon their rights, privileges or prerogatives, it seems to No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 167 me that this State Board of Agriculture should be disposed to co- -operate with the Breeders’ Association, the Dairy Union or other organizations of that kind who want to meet with them in the same week and take part in their work, and share a part of the privileges that they may have at that time. It seems to me very desirable that all these organizations should meet in the same week. I know that in the State of Ohio the Sheep Breeders’ Association and differ- ent other organizations—Shorthorn cattle, Jersey cattle, swine breeders and other associations meet the same week. In Indiana the same thing has existed for several years. I have been in In- diana at the time of the holding of their winter meetings, and in- stead of there being one thousand, 1,260 were present, and took part, not only in the Corn Growers’ and Stock Breeders’ Association, but other organizations that met at the same time, and I do hope that this may continue, and that a committee may be appointed which shall be empowered to arrange with these other associations to cover the whole time, having a popular meeting at night, say the first popular meeting on Tuesday evening under the auspices of the Breeders’ Association, if you please, and another one on Wednes- day evening under the State Board, and another one on Thursday evening under the auspices of the State Dairy Union. I think that the State Board of Agriculture ought to feel itself complimented and that they should do everything in their power to bring these organizations together at that time so as to have one good, big full week devoted to the interests of agriculture and to the stock breeders and dairymen of the State of Pennsylvania. MR. CLARK: Mr. Chairman, I made a motion which has not been acted upon. The reading of the motion was called for. The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, as I have noted it, the motion was as follows: It was moved by Mr. Clark that the Secretary would be authorized to arrange the meeting of the State Board of Agriculture so as to begin on Tuesday. MR. STOUT: Mr. Chairman, couldn’t you arrange to have this order of business without doing that? Don’t that disarrange the whole proceedings of the Board according to the requirements of the law? The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, the election of officers must be the particular order of the day on Wednesday under the act of As- sembly. MR. SEXTON: Mr. Chairman, I agree with Mr. Orr who suggested that the Board of Agriculture ought to feel complimented by the re- quest of the other organizations to participate with us at the an- nual meeting. We certainly do, but we want them to do much better in that line in the future than they have done in the past, when perhaps they came in the afternoon or in the evening to meet us. I think it would be well to hold on to our old custom of having the full State Board meeting on Wednesday and Tuesday as well if we decide to open the meeting Tuesday morning; that is all right, but we want both Tuesday and Wednesday and it seems to me that 168 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. the Secretary can arrange for speakers on Wednesday evening. If we want the Association to help us we can have some of the promi- nent breeders give us an address on that night. It seems to me that that would be all right. Mr. Herr asked for the reading of the motion made by Mr. Clark again, The Secretary read as follows: “Moved and seconded that the Secretary be authorized to arrange the meeting of the State Board of Agriculture so as to begin on Tuesday.” MR. HERR: Mr. Chairman, I move to amend Mr. Clark’s motion by saying, “ to adjourn not earlier than Wednesday night.” The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, the Secretary would never take the authority to make any other arrangement. MR. HERR: Mr. Chairman, the Breeders’ Association have asked for Wednesday evening and I think that the Board ought to have it. MR. CLARK: Mr. Chairman, that is all right, the Secretary will do what is right; we are satisfied he will. The question being on the amendment, it was agreed to. The question recurring on the original motion as amended, it was agreed to. The CHAIR: Is there any more New Business? MR. KAHLER: Mr. Chairman, I ask leave to offer a resolution. — There being no objection, the resolution was read by Mr. Kahler as follows: Whereas, Agriculture is regarded as a paramount interest of our State, and contributes more to the general welfare of the State than any other industry, and Whereas, This Board for years in the past have labored for the uplifting of agriculture and education, and as we are aware that it is absolutely necessary that we have legislative aid to accomp- lish work, and there is no means of accomplishing it except through the agency of the ballot box, and Whereas, This Board is absolutely a non-partisan association, Therefore be it Resolved, That this Board of Agriculture of Penn- sylvania pledge its individual support, and as there has been in the past and is in the present an atmosphere of reform, that we pledge our best efforts and will use all honorable means along non-partisan lines to see that the very best men are nominated and elected in the coming campaign, men that are identified with our interests and who will give us a fair deal. Mr. KAHLER: Mr. Chairman, I would say in support of the reso- lution, that I think it is an opportune time before our officers are selected, that we look, as all other industries do, a little to our own interests on non-partisan lines, and I think that we should devote a little more attention to our own interests. I, therefore, move the adoption of the preamble and resolutions. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 169 MR. HALL: Mr. Chairman, I second the motion. The question being on the motion it was agreed to. MR. HALL: Mr. Chairman, there is a matter in the way of an unofficial statement in regard to the fact that there is to be new appointments at State College that will amount nearly to re-organi- zation. It is almost absolutely certain that the Board of Trus- tees will be obliged to agree upon some one to take Dr. Atherton’s place. It is also stated that Dr. Armsby is to be given the charge of the Bureau of Animal Nutrition and there will be a new man ap- pointed as Dean of the School of Agriculture and in charge of the Experiment Station. Now all the members of the Board know that the Act that created and provided for the land grants for colleges, of which Pennsylvania State College is one, specified that it did so, that they might give in- struction in agriculture and the mechanic arts. Those of us who have visited the State College and given any thought to the matter, must have been struck with the disproportion of development be- tween the primary and the secondary mission of the college. The secondary mission—the instruction in the mechanic arts has been brought to a very satisfactory state, but the primary mission— the instruction in agriculture—seems not to have reached so satis- factory a state. Now it appears to me that one of the things that this Board ought to do, is to express its opinion as to who should succeed Dr. Armsby and Dr. Atherton in these positions. Now it would seem to me that it would be a good thing for the Board to urge upon the Board of Trustees that those positions be filled by men who are graduates of some agricultural industrial college, and when I say that, mean graduates of some college that has developed along the lines that the Act evidently intended they should de- velop. Now all of us would deplore very much any reorganization of that college that would lower the standard of the department of Me- chanic Arts, but all of us would hail with joy any reorganization there which would bring agriculture up on a level or even put it in advance of the department of Mechanic Arts, and it seems to me that we ought to recommend men for these two positions whose education and training and subsequent achievements are such as to ensure their being in sympathy with agriculture, so that those of us who visit the college may not find, as we do now, that the col- lege spirit is not in favor of agriculture. If we had men in the two positions named it seems to me that that proportion and that spirit might be changed so that the college would be known just as widely and just as favorably for the strength of its department of agricul- ture, as it is now for its department of Mechanic Arts. I do not know that it would be right to commit the Board to it but it seems to me that a resolution asking the trustees to fill those two positions with graduates from some agricultural, industrial col- lege would now be timely. The CHAIR: Are there any more remarks upon the resolution? MR. BEARDSLEE: Mr. Chairman, I do not think there is any risk to run at all in this matter, and that the proper thing to do is 12 170 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. just to leave it in the hands of the Board of Trustees. I think they are qualified to do the right thing. MR. BROSIUS: Mr. Chairman, it seems to me that we would be very unfit to recommend anyone for those positions. To-day the college does stand as one of the leading colleges of the State, while many men who work along agricultural lines think it has been di- verted from its original intent, to make an agricultural college. Any- one that has read the law—the Morrill law—will find that it was intended to help develop Pennsylvania in all her great industries; and while it is perhaps true that it can do better than it has done in the past, yet many of us who live a hundred miles or more from the college are hardly fitted to judge of its needs, therefore, I agree with our friend here that the wise way is to allow the Trustees to take care of the college. MR. HERR: Mr. Chairman, the subject is one of very great in- terest to me, and ought to be to every member of the State Board of Agriculture, and I feel that I am justified in saying, on behalf of the Board of Trustees, that I believe it is their purpose to strengthen the agricultural department of that college all they know how. I believe they are working with a common purpose to that end. The Pennsylvania State College is our college and we are inter- ested in it. It is a great institution and it has a very high standing with a strong corps of professors in the faculty, which it must necessarily have, and it must maintain an efficient corps of in- structors throughout. I want to tell you most emphatically that you can’t appreciate and do not know the amount of expense incurred to keep up its present efficiency. We are burdened with debt and I want to say this to you, that the appropriations that come from the Legislature, the great bulk of them, are specific. They can only go for the special purpose for which they are appropriated. We can’t apply them to making the college more efficient, and building it up, increasing the strength of the faculty, and increasing the facilities for education there. With the increased number of students who come there every year, they need much greater facilities. While they have some eight hundred students, they are only properly equipped for about two hundred or two hundred and fifty, and without additional appropria- tions for general purposes instead of specific ones, as has usually been the case, it is impossible with the debt now existing to make the college what it should be, and it is up to you farmers to see to it that the men whom you elect to the Legislature be made to under- stand the situation and give us more money for general purposes. All over the State I hear it said: “Why, Carnegie gave you $150,- 000; Schwab gave you another $150,000 and yet you say you want more money.” They forget that this all entails additional expense to the college to take care of these new buildings that have been erected and to properly equip them. I want you to instruct your members of the Legislature that we must have more money for maintenance and for equipment; that is where we are lame. We are doing the very best we can, and accounting for every dollar of the money that is spent there, but we must have larger appro- priations for the purposes I have stated. The Agricultural Depart- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 171 ment of the Pennsylvania State College, if the farmers had taken hold of it long before as they have in the last couple of years, would have been way ahead of where it is now, but when we had an agri- cultural building worth two thousand dollars with an engineering building worth $250,000, it is easy to see where the students would drift to. When we get the right faculty and equipment in the Agricultural Department, we will have more students in the agricultural course. That is the common purpose we want to work for, and we ought not to support members of the Assembly who will not stand by your agricultural interests in the instruction of our youth. I am in earnest in this matter, and I have been on the Board of Trustees for a long time, and I have studied over it and grieved over it. It has worried me a great deal to find just how that college stood, but we have done the best we could with the amount of money that we had to support it. We need additional support and if you would go there and examine it, you would find out that we need some help, if we are to make the college what we want it to be. That new building—McAllister Hall—we were simply obliged to go into the market and borrow the money to build that hall because we couldn’t accommodate the sttideuts without it. I believe it is self-sustaining. It is an important thing, but the debt is there, which ought not to be there, and they are really obliged to make the debts. I want the Legislature—I want the sentiment of the people to go in there and say to the Legislature and to the Goy- ernor that they must help us out of this predicament and give us the appropriations that we need in order that we may have a college that we want. MR. BEARDSLEE: Mr. Chairman, I am in favor of electing a Governor who won’t veto what the Legislature does. MR. HERR: Mr. Chairman, that is right. The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, don’t you want to be sure first what the Legislature will do? MR. BEARDSLEE: Mr. Chairman, well, what they did do; they cut the appropriation right in two. MR. BLACK: Speaking of the fact that the appropriations are specific, I recall that we wanted a few steers at one time out there and they had no money to devote to that purpose and they indi- cated that if certain persons would donate some steers, they would take care of them. Several members in Western Pennsylvania donated some steers to the college. Some two or three months afterwards, they sent for a sample of corn. These steers were donated and the freight was paid by the State and they were de- livered at the college. The CHAIR: Mr. Hall, did you want to offer a resolution? MR. HALL: Mr. Chairman, if 1 offered a resolution now, it would be to the effect that the Legislature appropriate an adequate amount, with no strings to it, to give the college what it wants, and to pay its debts. 172 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. MR. BEARDSLEE: And let them buy their own steers. MR. HALL: Yes. The SECRETARY: Mr. Chairman, I move that we do now adjourn. The motion being seconded, it was agreed to. N. B. CRITCHFIELD, Secretary. NORE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 173 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FARMERS’ ANNUAL NORMAL INSTI- TUTE, HELD IN THE COURT HOUSE AT CLEARFIELD, PA., MAY 29, 30 AND 381, 1906. Court House, Clearfield, Pa., Tuesday, 2.00 P. M., May 29, 1906. The meeting was called to order at the designated hour by Deputy Secretary Martin, who announced J. W. Nelson, of Shawville, Pa., as Chairman, and also made the following remarks: DEPUTY SERETARY MARTIN: Before entering upon the work proper, it would be well to state that we have question blanks here for distribution, and we request that all members and visitors make use of these blanks, write the questions which you desire to ask and at the close of every lesson, the questions can be taken up and answered. We have with us, as you will have observed, a stenog- rapher, it being our intention to take down the entire proceedings of the meeting. Please be as concise and direct as possible in order that the stenographer may prepare a manuscript that will be en- tirely satisfactory. We would appoint as a committee to distribute and take up the question blanks, Mr. George F. Barnes, of York, and Mr. Chubbuck, of Bradford counties, who will have charge of that part of the work. I know of nothing additional to say, my friends, further than express the pleasure it affords me to look into the faces of such a goodly number of the old workers—farmers institute workers of the State. We should say, however, that even here in Clearfield county, a county which takes a great interest in this work, we in- vite the citizens of the town and the county to join with us. They are heartily welcome to this meeting, and we shall be glad to have them engage with us in the discussion of the topics that are on the program. We would also be pleased if the delegates not only would enroll their names on the registry list, but all others present. This can be done at any time when it will not disturb the meeting. Now without further remarks, the meeting is placed in the hands of your chairman, Mr. Nelson. MR. NELSON, Chairman: Mr. Secretary and Members of the State Board of Agriculture, and Institute Lecturers for Pennsylvania: It surely gives me a great deal of pleasure to welcome you people here to our town of Clearfield. For the five years or more that I have had charge of the Institute work of Clearfield county, my associations with the members of the State Board of Agriculture, have been of the most pleasant and agreeable kind, and I assure you that I have enjoyed your meetings and have received a great deal of information during those years, and when I decided last winter to retire for a while in favor of a friend of mine who, during the next three years will take my place in the State Board, and I am glad that I have been successful in achieving this result, and I am glad that I have the pleasure of 174 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. speaking to you in my own native town to-day; glad that my last ' official connection with the State Board of Agriculture is in the town of Clearfield. I hope you will enjoy your stay here, and that you will find it both pleasant and profitable. The county of Clearfield has taken a front rank in the institute work, and during the last year we held twenty-four days of con- tinous institute work in the county. I don’t know what we will be able to do in the future, for the good Book says, “Let not him that putteth on his harness, boast like him that taketh it off.” I want to apologize for the slimness of the attendance at this after- noon’s session, which is due to the fact that there is a convention in session at the other side of the river, and the room is full over there, and that has necessarily kept a great many of our farmers away this afternoon. I now have great pleasure in introducing to you the orator of the day, Judge Allison O. Smith, who will deliver the address of wel- come to the visiting members of the Department of Agriculture and members of this organization. ADDRESS OF WELCOME. By JUDGE ALLISON O. SMITH, Clearfield, Pa. Mr. Chairman: To me your officers have assigned the pleasure of welcoming your body to our midst, and I sincerely hope you will not measure the scope of your welcome by the shortcomings of the address. Clearfield county, as you all doubtless know, is not primarily an agricultural county, lumbering having been the chief business of past years. Mining and manufacturing, particularly of clay pro- ducts, and railroading, furnish employment to the great majority of our people to-day. Scientific and intelligent agriculture is, there- fore, in a measure in its infancy. Certainly then the educational influence of this institute with its varied program of instruction by learned professors, deserves from everybody in Clearfield, a hearty welcome. It don’t hurt to tell the truth, even about ourselves upon proper occasions, so that I want to say now to you who are strangers in the county, that the truth is that farming is not at the very highest stage of development in this county. This condition, I may say further, is not a criticism upon nor the fault of the very active and intelli- gent body of farmers of the county whom you will meet and whom it is my pleasure to greet at this institute. They are all right and are securing good results, but my complaint is that there are not enough of them. Our shortcomings, as an agricultural county, came about from natural conditions not hard to fathom. Not to mention some possible disadvantages of soil and climate, the farmer of this county in the past only made farming an inci- dent and not the real business of his life. So long as there remained a raft of timber on his farm, or in his neighborhood to cut and de- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 175 liver, he preferred to make his money out of it and farmed simply as a secondary matter, only enough to feed himself and his stock, generally even falling short on that.. The best powers either of mind or body were not given to the farm. With the passing away of the timber, his occupation was gone, and it too often became a serious problem for the old farmer to know how to make it go. We may truthfully say, therefore, that the Clearfield county farmer of past generations lived and died in the firm belief that farming here was a failure, and did not pay, and he was right from his point of view. So too, the boys, as a rule, left the old farm in the same belief, and became the professional man, the merchant, the mechanic and the miner of this generation, perhaps not to their advantage, either. The result is too apparent to anyone traveling through the country and shows itself up in hundreds of abandoned farms and vacant farm buildings with cleared fields surrounding them now grown up with briars and weeds. Now it is perfectly apparent to any one who gives this subject thought, that the future welfare of the county, demands that more and more intelligent farming shall be done, or a source of great wealth be lost. Large areas of cleared land now idle with the soil being washed off annually by rains, should be redeemed, cultivated and made to produce something, if not an annual crop, then let it by all means be re-forested intelligently. It is of course too true, that in many parts of the county, at least, we have positive disad- vantages of both soil and climate, and there was probably more truth than poetry in the complaint of the old lumberman farmer that it did not pay to farm as he didit. I take it too, that there may still be serious drawbacks in making it pay if followed on the old lines, and where mere grain growing is attempted; but what is the matter with dairying, raising poultry, truck farming and fruit rais- ing? Are they not profitable? The handicap of soil and climate is amply recompensed by the higher price obtained for such pro- ducts; quality too, is all right. For instance we get strawberries in our market from Florida in the early spring, and so on up along the coast, until the home berry is marketed in the summer. Now the plain fact is, that the best flavored and best strawberries gener- ally speaking, are our own berries, grown in the Grampian Hills. So too, the best peaches marketed in Clearfield, are home grown, and I hope soon to see the day when we will not need to go to New York state for our best apples. Now all this leads to one thought and one conclusion, and that is, that there is successful and profitable farming to be done in this county in spite of tradition to the contrary. Our only trouble is, as I view it, that not enough of our people have been giving the subject intelligent and thoughtful attention. With our vast popu- lation engaged in other trades, we of course cannot hope to be self- supporting and self-sustaining in all food products for man and beast, but a proper study into the nature of our soil and the un- certainties of our climate should demonstrate what to attempt to raise and what to leave alone, and will surely bring success along some lines. “S- May we not hope that the next generation will see our hills and valleys covered with fruit orchards and truck farms, financially successful beyond our dreams. If that day ever comes, however, 176 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. it will be due to the diffusion of scientific knowledge on farm topics which is taught through farm institute work such as we are now do- ing. The farmer of to-day must be intelligent, a thinker, as well as a worker. Time and money spent in institute work is well spent, and your work of education among us should be productive of the greatest benefit to all. We are indeed highly honored by having the leading thinkers of the State on farm and kindred topics among us on this occasion, and we fully believe that the helpful and stimu- lating influence of this meeting will be felt for years to come. In the name and on behalf of ail our people, I bid you a hearty welcome, and bespeak for your session both pleasure and profit. The CHAIR: I now call on the Secretary of Agriculture, the. Hon. N. B. Critchfield, to reply to the address of welcome, RESPONSE TO ADDRESS OF WELCOME. By HON. N. B. CRITCHFIELD, Secretary of Agriculture. Mr. Chairman, Judge Smith, and Citizens of Clearfield County: Everybody likes to feel that he is welcome wherever he goes, and it is certainly very agreeable to us to have the assurance that we have just received that we are welcome to this beautiful little city. My greatest regret is, sir, that the Governor of our Common- wealth, who is President of the State Board of Agricuiture, is not here to reply to the very eloquent address to which we have just had the pleasure of listening. We have heard of the resources of your county, and we rejoice with you in their possession, for what belongs to Clearfield ccunty, belongs to Pennsylvania; and so we rejoice with you in the possession of your forests and your mines and your agriculture, which we are sorry to hear you say is not in a flourishing condition. We not only rejoice in our possession with you of the wealth of which you can boast, but we feel proud to be recognized as fellow-citizens of the good people of Clearfield county. We farmers have come to understand that if we are going to do our best with our herds and our flocks, it is important that we shall not breed too closely along the same family line; we want to bring new blood into our herds if we are to do our best, and I take it that what is true with regard to the lower animals, is true also in relation to the human race. I believe that the best people are those who are descended from many races, and if I am not mis- taken with regard to your history, there courses through the veins of the people of Clearfield county the blood of the very best nations of the old world. When we go into some communities, we find the people descended from a single race; for example, in some communi- ties we find that the ancestry is entirely German; in others, Scotch, in others English, in others Welsh, and in others Irish, but if I am correctly informed by a gentleman with whom I have had some conversation this morning, your early settlers in this county, came from Germany and from Scotland and from Ireland, and England, NOs. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 17? and you even have here the English modifications that are found in the old Quaker stock of Eastern Pennsylvania, which we all know is not bad stock, therefore you ought to be good people, bred as you are, and it is not to be wondered at that you have the hearty, energetic, intelligent citizenship that we know resides in Clearfield county. We are glad as we come here, to recognize this, and we feel proud to be your guests, and glad to be here, to receive this royal welcome. But now, Mr. Chairman, if you will excuse me, I must tell you something about ourselves. I remember years ago to have read a very amusing little anecdote of a pious Irish girl, who, on a certain occasion, went to confession, and while she was telling the priest of her short-comings and her failures in life, she looked up into his his. face and said: “Father, I must tell you that I am engaged to be married to Patrick Dolan, and Pat was to see me the other night, and stayed until after twelve o’clock, and he kissed me.” The priest being in a rather jovial humor said, “Now Mary, didn’t Pat kiss you more than once?” And quick as a flash came the reply. “Now Holy Father, I came here to confess, and not to boast.” And so like the Irish girl, I did not come here to boast, but I want to say to you, sir, that the brawny hands that we reach out to-day to re- ceive the royal welcome extended to us, are the hands that feed the world. Standing here in the temple of justice, I can but admire your work as it relates to all the liberal professions of life. Iwas walk- ing over your town this morning and I admired the beautiful work- manship of your artists and artisans, and I heard some gentleman tell of the great fortunes have been amassed by some of the people here who have cut down your forests and taken your lumber to market, and we admire the business skill and acumen that have enabled men in the past in your midst to accumulate these great fortunes. But sir, what would become of the race, if for but a Single year, the farmers of the country were to neglect to improve the seedtime and harvest which a kind Heavenly Father has promised to give through them to the children of men. Our calling is not only the oldest under the sun, but it is the one calling without which the world cannot survive. You have referred to the fact that the farmer needs to be edu- cated, and we have in recent years come to understand this matter as we never did before. We have come sir, to look upon our busi- ness as a profession, and we have come to realize that there is no industry that stands so closely associated with the great forces of nature as does the industry of agriculture. We realize the need of education, and so a beneficient government has in response to our eall established our agricultural colleges all over our land. We have them in almost every state in the Union, but sir, we cannot all attend college. Some of us are too old, and those of us who are young, are under the necessity of battling with the realities of life in order*to make a livelihood, and so we cannot all go to col- lege, hence we have our institutes, a means by which the college comes to us and reaches out a helping hand, and here is where-.our State Department of Agriculture takes up the work, and broadens and extends the work that has been begun by our general Govern- ment. Our general assembly makes an appropriation by means of 12—7T—1906. 178 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. which we are enabled to employ men, graduated from our agricul- tural colleges, and others graduated from the equally important school of experience, who travel all over this broad Commonwealth, to impart instruction to those who wish to learn. The work begins in the fall of the year, just as soon as we have gathered in our crops. When we have our potatoes and our apples and our cider stored away in the cellar, and our fuel is all gathered in, then our insti- tute work begins, and these lecturers travel over the State giving instruction in methods of cultivation, soil improvement, dairying, stock breeding and farm and household economy, which proves bene- ficial to us all, and this, sir, is the character of the people that you have here to-day. The men who are engaged in this work need to be well equipped, for the farmer is not only a student, but he is an apt student, who not only learns readily but who has the ability to discern between the teaching that is true and that which is false. I remember that when a few years ago this work was begun in the State of Pennsylvania, there were doubting Thomases in the audience, and not until there had been some progress, until they saw the effect it was having upon our agriculture, did some of these men regard the work favorably, but they are becoming apt pupils now. These instructors that we send out must be able to keep up with the advances made by their pupils, and sometimes this is no easy task. I remember when I was a boy of sixteen, I taught a public school to which there came a class of boys and girls older than myself who had been away to an Academy, where they had been studying Eng- lish Analysis, and had gone through the first book of Davies Al- gebra, and I tell you, I had a tough time of it to keep out of their way. I think possibly such has been the case in regard to our in- stitute work, but thanks to the energy and earnest devotion of these lecturers, they have kept in advance. They seem to have seen in the very beginning of the work, that it would be necessary for them to keep in advance of their pupils, and that to do this they must labor industriously and they did it, and did it well, and it is due to their energy and fidelity and to the good judgment of our Director of Institutes, Brother Martin, that we have kept up the standard, and we have been able to meet the call for higher train- ing and more advanced work as that call has come, This, Mr, Chairman, is the character of the people whom you en- tertain to-day. I am glad to have received this welcome from Judge Smith, and I am glad to be here. I am glad to have the honor of being entertained by the good people of Clearfield and Clearfield county, and when the work of this week has been done, when we have accompished the objects that have brought us together, and when we go out, as I trust we shall, strengthened for the work in which we are engaged, to our various homes and various fields of labor, I feel sure we shall go cherishing the kindest feelings to- wards the people of this little city, and (addressing Judge Smith) I hope that you, sir, and the citizens of Clearfield will feel that some little good has come into your lives because of your association with us. The CHAIR: We have with us this afternoon one of the largest market gardeners in Pennsylvania, one of the men who uses the No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 179 most fertilizers of any person in the State, and one of our good old grangers, Brother M. S. Vaughn. We shall be glad to hear from him. MR. VAUGHN: Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen of the City and County of Clearfield: In behalf of the officers and members of this organization, I wish to thank you for this cordial welcome, this fraternal greeting that has just been extended to us by an honorable representative of your city and county; and let me say, my friends, that it affords me great gratification to be able to tell you that he is a product of the soil of my native county. He is one of my boys. We grew up together, I was a little ahead of him; we toiled and labored in the fields side by side. We have eaten at the same table, partaken of the same nourishment, and we have huntea rattle-snakes and picked huckleberries side by side, and that was before the discovery of the antidote of the rattle-snake bite, and we were not provided with it. I feel proud that I can stand here and realize the predictions that were made years ago, the predictions in regard to this honorable gentleman have been borne out and confirmed. I always predicted that for him, because from a boy to a man, you never found him engaged in anything, countenancing or recognizing anything that did not lead to the highest standard of manhood. Now I am only here to emphasize a few of the remarks that have already been made. I wish to emphasize a few of the reflections that your worthy Secretary made in reference to this class of people. I want to say to you people of Clearfield that it will not be neces- sary for you to increase the number of your peace officers or enlarge your present accommodations in your county jail on our account. We can vouch for every man among us with one exception, and if the supply of vegetable matter and cow-horn turnips holds out, perhaps even he will not be an exception. I want to thank you for this privilege of addressing you. I do ~not intend to consume much of your time, but I want again to ex- tend to you the thanks of this convention, and all the members of this convention for this cordial greeting and this kind welcome, so ably given to us at this meeting. (Cries for “Bob” Seeds.) MR. SEEDS: Mr. Chairman, County Chairmen, Institute Workers, and Ladies and Gentlemen: I want to say to you that I am delighted . to meet you people, and I want to take this occasion to thank the county chairmen for the nice way they have treated me in going over the State of Pennsylvania. I also want to thank the Institute workers for helping me to make the institutes a success. As long as I am interested in agriculture, I want to be with you. I am glad to meet you. Since I was a little bit of a boy at my grandfather’s knee, I have heard of Clearfield county, and my first impression of Clearfield county was such that I believed that if a whippoorwill would come here, he would have found the conditions such that he couldn’t stay over night. I sat at my grandfather’s knee when I heard them talk about a farm that he owned in Clearfield county. T heard him tell his boy that he was going to sell it, because he said that the trees were so large it would cost more to take them off the land than the farm was worth; that farm was worth more than— 180 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. the coal beneath the surface was, worth more than his farm over in Huntingdon county. I am delighted to come to your county. I had the pleasure of traveling through this county when I was working for the Deering Harvester Company, and the largest sale I ever made in any one week I made in your county, and I found more summer schools in Clearfield than in any other county I ever visited. When you talk about Farmers’ Institutes, I will tell you that the rest of the counties want to get a skate on, if they want to keep up with Clearfield county. I want to thank you for the privilege of being with you. I know that Brother Vaughn has talked about my cow-horn turnips; I guess I am known all over the State, if not all over the country as the biggest story teller in the world, but I would sooner be even a good liar than a poor farmer. The Secretary struck the keynote when he talked about the Insti- tute lecturer keeping out of the road of his pupils. The whole thing hinges on education. I once heard a definition of education that struck me very forcibly: “An education is that which puts a man onto his job.” It is just that. It is just so with the architect, just so with the lawyer, and just so with the farmer. I remember a story of a certain man who fell down and struck his nose in such a way on a sharp instrument that it was cut completely off. He picked up his nose and stuck it on again and tied it on with a ban- dage, and after a while, when he thought the nose had properly healed, he took off the bandage and looked in a looking-glass, and lo and behold, he had put his nose on upside down, and every time it rained, the rain ran down his throat, and every time the poor fellow sneezed, it blew his hat off. He wasn’t educated; he didn’t observe, or he would never have put his nose on wrong side up. I tell you the whole thing hinges on education, yet often the man who has given us a new idea has been calied a crank. When Fulton built the first steamboat, he had a rich uncle who had money to burn, and the uncle told him it wouldn’t do, but Robert Fulton worked on through his rich uncle declined to help him out with a cent. He never ceased his efforts and after his little steamboat was completed and he pushed it out into the Hud- son River and rang the bell to go ahead, there was trouble in that little boat and it wouldn’t move and his rich old uncle stood on the river bank and said, “Bob, I told you it wouldn’t go; it won’t go, it will never go.” But Robert was not discouraged. He took his. wrenches and his tools and he did this and he did that; he adjusted a bolt here and a screw there, did a few things that he thought neces- sary and then he pulled the throttle open and his little steamboat moved on, and his old uncle stood on the bank and shouted after him, “You’ll never get it stopped, you’ll never get it stopped!” That is the way it has been ever since the foundation of the world. “It is the man who does the best who gets more kicks than all the rest.” No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 181 From the register it was found that the following Institute Managers «were present: County. Name and Place. BCE AYIR FN fox ctay ar civorsr nc) eiclcletnloyaie Siusefaieietcleves A. I. Weidner, Arendtsville. PAREN OMY. oa cio, cta,cloniere os ela,ee ce eiereiere .J. S. Burns, Imperial, R. F. D. No. 1. BBEMIBELONE: bee ccc. ccc cesencccectcees S. S. Blyholder, Neale. BREE MC IS rare oem oe tesa wis: Cannes e's aemee A. L. McKibben, New Sheffield. “REDNESS Coadapdgcosoo seu nooeaaAGouee H. K. Lutz, Bedford. LS LDUR, Yosocen Go soe UBER a OBE cide Scene H. L. Harvey, Juniata. RES TeU PEON CMe a micicisialeleietacerasistelsievers' sey ee E. E. Chubbuck, Rome, R. F. D. No. 16. SRN easel cata: ecole cial oie vivlin elaieleie Siereieneierels) 6 Watson T. Davis, Ivyland. BOEEMAUI TNS facia sislota/s in erelaieislinienc/o sahelsveevelere H. J. Krumenacker, Carrolltown. DDD TiNy (Age eSnqded odor GOaDCog nec ae Brice Brinckman, Weatherly. MBSESIN EE Ge o%e, a A 4 Ay 325 Comparison of Retail Price of Beef in Chicago and in Country Town. 1,200 Pound Steer, 1,000 Pound Cow. Local. Chicago. Local, Chicago. Cut. Pounds. Dollars. Dollars. Pounds. Dollars Dollars. Price. Cents. Price. Cents. Price. Cents. Weight. Cost. Cost. Weight. Cost Cost. A good 1,200 pound steer will net 60 per cent. while a 1,000 pound common cow will net only 50 per cent. More than half thé meat of the steer is in the high priced cuts, less than half of that of the cow. This table shows that whereas the Chicago retailer and the local butcher get practically the same for the high priced cuts of a good steer, the local dealer gets $35.53 for the low priced ones which the Chicago dealer must sell for $16.75, or less than half as much. As- suming that the steer cost five and a half cents per pound and the cow three cents the profit to the local butcher was $35.82 or about 60 per cent. on the steer and $35.76 or 119 per cent. on the cow. The profit to the Chicago butcher would be $16.10 or about 27 per cent. on the steer and $7.50 or 25 per cent. on the cow. The local butcher gets two-thirds as much for the low priced cuts as for the high priced ones. He can thus afford to pay more for the common stock than the city butcher can. The local butcher on the other hand cannot pay so much for the better animal because he can make more profit off the common ones and because he cannot realize so much on the by-products. Thus some animals can be sold to best advantage in a small town, others in large markets. Whether the farmer should buy his animals or raise them is largely a question which each man must decide for himself. If pasture is plentiful and convenient it will usually pay to raise the animals. It frequently takes some months for the western animals - to become acclimated and recover from the injurious effects of the long car ride. It may thus be found more profitable to raise the animals than to buy them from the West, even if western animals of the same size and quality can be had a few dollars cheaper than the natives. Another advantage in favor of the feeder raising his own calves is that he has complete control of them from the day 326 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. they are born, and the younger the animal the greater the gain for food consumed. The age at which animals are fed has a great deal to do with their powers of assimilation. The younger the animal in general the less the cost of production. Professor H. R. Smith in his recent book on “Profitable Stock Feeding,” gives the following figures: ““Averag- ing six different trials when accurate records were kept of gains and cost of food it is found that during the first twelve months each 100 pounds of increase in live weight costs $3.45; the second twelve months in the same animal $7.42; and the third twelve months $11.50.” At the Illinois Experiment Station a carload each of range bred calves, yearlings and two-year-olds were fed. At the beginning of the experiment the calves averaged 384 pounds, the yearlings 784 pounds, and the two-year-olds 1,032 pounds. The net cost of 100 pounds of gain was $4.10 on the calves, $5.60 on the yearlings and $6.60 on the two-year-olds. The profits in beef production, however, consist not alone in the increased weight of the animal but also in the enhanced value of the original carcass. Thus if an eight hundred pound animal costs four cents a pound and after being fattened sells for five cents a pound there is a profit of eight dollars on the original carcass. On the other hand, if the animal had originally weighed a thousand pounds, this profit would have been ten dollars so there is an advantage in favor of beginning with larger animals. This difference might easily be offset, however, by the greater age of the larger animal. Where animals are grown for fattening the greatest profit will nearly always be found in fattening as young as possible. If west- ern animals are to be fed it will usually be found more profitable to feed the larger ones, as long yearlings or two-year olds, on account of the greater margin afforded by the heavier original weight. The young animals are producing muscles and other living tissues as well as fat. At the same time the carcass of the young animal contains a higher percentage of water so that less food is required for a pound of gain then than after the animal becomes older. The muscles contain on the average about 66 per cent. water. There- fore only one-third of the gain in muscle must be made from the food eaten. On the other hand, the fatty tissue contains only about 10 per cent. water and must therefore be produced almost entirely from the food. As the animals grow older, cell activity decreases, growth is not so rapid and the water-content diminishes. Young animals, therefore, require a greater per cent. of protein and can use it to better advantage than older ones. While muscle-producing foods may cost a little more per pound, they will often be cheaper than those capable of producing fat alone. Animals intended for beef production, should always be fattened while growth is still active. Growth continues up to four or five years although of course it is more rapid while younger, while in general it may be said, the younger the animal the more nitrogenous its ration; of course there is a possibility of making it too nitro- genous to be profitable. Protein for maintenance and for growth is all that is required. Any excess only goes to produce heat or fat and for that purpose it is too expensive. It seems to matter little No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 327 whether the protein is derived from the grain or the roughage. Corn fed ‘with a leguminous hay seems to give fully as good results as corn and oil meal or cotton-seed meal fed with timothy hay or corn stover. The animal that has enough protein in its food and is young enough to make a good growth will not get patchy when fattened like the one that is older or is fed on a less nitrogenous ration. In producing beef animals from common cows, the bull is con- siderably more than half the herd. The more the cows depart from the beef type the stronger the bull should incline toward it. This does not mean that a beef bull bred to high grade Jersey cows will produce profitable beef steers; he will not. Such breeding will al- ways result in a loss. But the cow that is a heavy milker with a tendency to lay on flesh when dry, will produce a good steer when crossed with a beef sire. Whatever else is done the dual purpose sire should be avoided. The dual purpose cow may be all right, but the dual purpose steer has no place in the feed lot. When beef animals are wanted, a beef sire should be used; when dairy animals are wanted, a dairy sire should be used; if scrubs are wanted, a dual purpose sire will answer the purpose. It is not safe to use any but a pure bred sire. He should bea good individual, well bred but not necessarily fashionably bred. It would not pay to put $500 into a bull for a herd of twenty-five grade cows, but it probably would pay to put in $100 rather than $50. The calves would have to be worth only $2.00 more per head to have the difference returned the first year. A high grade bull that is a good individual and whose breeding is known to be good may be better than a pure bred scrub, but such an animal is not often found; his breeding is usually unknown. Entirely too many of the bulls in this State are just bulls, without form and void. Like the provy- erbial mule, they are without pride of ancestry, but they certainly have hope of posterity so far as numbers are concerned. It is no wonder steers do not pay. There is too much competition at present to permit of spontaneous breeding being profitable. It takes no more feed to raise a good animal than a poor one; it may not take as much. It does take a little more intelligence. According to the twelfth census, the farmers of Pennsylvania spend annually almost $5,000,000 for commercial fertilizers. This is more than is spent in any other state except Georgia. A large amount of this could be saved by feeding the crops out on the farm and properly caring for the manure. Pennsylvanians are depending too much upon the West to supply their animals. They ship in their beef from Chicago, their pork from Buffalo, and their horses from St. Louis. It is a well known fact that fattening animals return a higher per cent. of the fertilizing constituents in their food than any other class. In an experiment at the Pennsylvania Experiment Station and published in Bulletin No. 63, 86.63 per cent. of the nitro- gen, 82.98 per cent. of the phosphoric acid, and 93.95 per cent. of the potash in the food and litter of fattening steers was recovered in the manure. The actual amount recovered in any instance will depend upon the method of feeding and of handling the manure. Tests made at the same station and published in the same bulletin, show that there is much less loss in manure with steers kept in pens or box stalls, where the manure is allowed to accumulate under them and is trampled into a compact layer, than with those kept 328 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. tied up in stanchions or stalls which must be cleaned out daily even when the manure removed is stored under shed. One of the conclu- sions of this test was that, “The money-value of the fertilizer con- stituents lost by the second as compared with the first method is equivalent to $2.50 for each steer stabled for six months.” While this difference may seem small it is undoubtedly worth con- sidering where fertilizers must be bought, especially since the trampled manure seems to be in better mechanical condition. There is yet another advantage in the pen or box stall over the stanchion; that is in the saving of labor. The question of labor is always an important one. In no manner can the crops be fed with so little labor as to beef animals. One of the advantages which beef production has over milk production is in the less amount of labor required. A man can tend to fifty fattening steers as easily as to ten milk cows. The steers can be handled with much less labor if kept in pens or large stalls of from ten to twenty each than if kept tied up. They can be kept cleaner in the pens with less labor, They can be fed more quickly and much or little bedding may be used as desired. Two tests were made at the Pennsylvania Experiment Station to compare the amount of time required to care for steers confined by these two methods. In the first test with five steers in each lot it appeared that it required about one-fifth more time to care for steers tied up than for those loose in pens. In the second test with ten steers in the pen and six tied up it appeared that 100 steers tied required as much labor as 180 loose in pens. The gains in live-weight and the consumption of food were practically the same for each lot. The results of these two experiments have been published in Bul- letins Nos. 53 and 57. It does not pay, therefore, to fasten the steers up with stanchions and chains. The greater expense for the equipment for the method is also against it. The practice of tying originated when steers wore horns and it was then necessary for the safety of both cattle and feeder, but now when everything is dehorned, the need no longer exists. A man buying cattle for feeders should refuse all that have their horns on. If he raises them of course he will de- horn them while they are young. Warm quarters are not necessary for steers when being fattened. Experiments at Pennsylvania State College reported in Bulletins Nos. 64 and 74, have indicated that temperature of surroundings has very little to do with the economy of gains. In fact it has been proved that there is much more liability of basement stables be- ing too warm than too cold for fattening steers. Open sheds well ventilated with a small dry yard attached are fully as satisfactory as barns. The cost of such sheds would of course be much legs. The preparation of the feed always requires some labor and expenditure. Even if the farmer raises his own corn it has usually been thought that it is not economy to feed it unground, but recent experiments at the Pennsylvania State College indicate that broken ear corn is about as valuable as corn and cob meal for fattening steers. Where the farmers lives some distance from the mill, the time lost hauling the corn to and from there is quite considerable. The miller will seldom grind for less than $2 per ton. The ear corn may be broken as fed for a much less expenditure than that. A No 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 329 man will easily break a ton of ears in less than three hours. It has been argued as an advantage in favor of grinding that cotton- seed meal or oil meal can be mixed readily with ear corn. While this is true it has been found just as satisfactory to put cotton-seed meal on top of the broken corn as to mix it with it. In this way the feed will be fairly well mixed by the cattle when eaten. Another advantage in favor of broken corn is that a greater amount of the undigested corn will be recovered by hogs if they have access to the steers. Where corn must be shipped in, it of course will be shelled on account of the freight. It might be better ground as the steers will not chew the shelled corn so well as the broken ears. These are but a few of the questions connected with beef produc- tion, and they have been touched upon but briefly. It is not recom- mended that every one engage in the business or that it become as general as it is further west, but it is a profitable method of market- ing corn, of utilizing pasture and of converting straw into fertilizer. It is on the increase on some of the highest priced lands in the State, a fact which would indicate its profitableness. It is doubt- ful whether summer feeding is advisable, except for young animals, preferably natives. But that we can produce baby beef and fatten more steers to advantage is firmly believed. On motion, the Normal Institute adjourned. A. L. MARTIN, Deputy Secretary of Agriculture and Darector of Institutes. 22 ( 330 ) PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTIETH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE Pennsylvania State board of Agriculture, OLD EXECUTIVE BUILDING, HARRISBURG, PA., JANUARY 22 AND 238, 1907. ( 331 ) OFFICIAL DO Sie et No. 7. MEMBERS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE, FOR THE YEAR 1907. Members Ex-Officio. HON. EDWIN S. STUART, Governor. HON. HENRY HOUCK, Secretary of Internal Affairs. DR. N. C. SCHAEFFER, Superintendent of Public Instruction. Recta ole oe, c.ciare So: a: lo'b va, alstereta’se/ viaraie President of the State College. HON. ROBERT K. YOUNG, Auditor General. HON. N. B. CRITCHFIELD, Secretary of Agriculture. Appointed by the Governor. inpmdomMes A. Beaver, Centre COUNLY, = occ ccs ciceaccies ces cjeio sic scic Term expires 1907 rae ouns., Middletown, Dauphin County, 25... .0<.52 mci cv se Term expires 1908 Col. R. H. Thomas, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, ...... Term expires 1909 Appointed by the State Poultry Association. 1. ID. ig (EIS ARB ao acae ce ecOnOnnOTnoHer CoC orGcd Philadelphia ckas oacceoce feces 1910 Elected by County Agricultural Societies. Term expires. IGANG, cscs ss <0 cee Foc souls Wate late eo ooeninc FALLEN GES WUC at ae osreleisivie sistereteciare 1909 PIC EREMNY:, Warriors Marks ac 2 .ccterretaeier 1909 Ibe TERTO ST Bonobaoodcndac S. M. McHenry, .:..... Ibsebihsr ee Baaeecd doooaondCoUo CO - 1910 TEMerS OM ss lclsicinielsleiseteate Peter B. Cowan, S dei qu “Geesaqonocnocooss oc 1910 anihayr eee AAngdodnodoocc .Matthew Rodgers, IMEC KAC OM, sek wi tieie isis 1c aotsrereicratctoteretete 1909 THACKE WANNA, Kejccccccice Horace Seamans, ..... Wactorywille; occ scsies veer 1910 TANCASTCT: mien icevetecic sie sieve Wee ep STOSiUISs wemceces Mernglen, .f5icsc0c0 enemnsice an ele Lawrence, ........ cles WICH LCATYmcrivlercic WENN" S5ongococdaucadcdobe a0 20 1909 TUCDANION.. | ciejscisie cleelvision'e EG Sm avieliy me ntecioncr. Cleon. eo slesia ws caveteee evereiorene ...1916 JE obeJots “Gseuondoona06 00s S henstermaker,, .. AllemtOwim,) Gniecice- > -)-> aleterensre 1909 TAUZ OTIC hs sterstemiciasierelere 9 Apu aian (sbohy(0Gio. | oncegpada TPruUckviller wactctecit crosses 1907 IDAWEOrenbh = GapgadacadGas XS cd ibe Seu Vere Gonanonace RUSHES VAIO; cin pale cielciersiois=tolotare 1909 NI CISER Th ce inicicieicicieie's $e ojoisiats eisisyore eroisisretowelelslaisiclavelsvercie, Tela erehershore(eteyuinieleraoratetere rol staneloietetstehaia tole iai NEETCOP iteeiclclaicistelore cieieje\e W. GPBilalekva.tcectetics Wika teed e Gupapdococoos0nddobaooN 1968 Mifflin, Eoleiecreletere MUSES Naginey, eae DMETITIOW:, oo cs clon cisiaie erasrertorete etter 1916 PONTO Co ecteia ctoisielaisieicleleye AIRS LOA TSG) eh ENA “Gao doc malvominiks veceeccoe = seteniaeers 1908 Montgomery, ......... SOD OREOM ET ere clatter stale scoters North! Wales. iecsca. acer cates 1908 VIG TAE OUI ware talolelaie:slelere ejelalels cis tsiere/slelsie'=/e'sl ofselalele)(afelaiala(oll icialalalalatsleyere coin) =(eta(ai=i=letela/=-takain\elels tee tal stanaieia Northampton... «ci s/ vier Boyertown. Classes aaeph oeanse mete Die, Wyalbbiehray AMES NEy aS5doecuodce State College. RUC OULS CONS acccesoocacesios ac Dr. Leonard Pearson, ........ Philadelphia. Sininiiniicioleas po keecc oso en sanoee Dr Howard! Haieri@k yy acres West Chester. Microscopists and Hygienists, Prof. C. B. Cochran, .......... West Chester. De eG eo Gs wG@roths cries cele Lewisburg. ETMEOMOLOSISES, Wis.cc'e.sicieisiejerc's miele Prot Ele PAGE Slice CC sc/- «loleleeret= Harrisburg. Prof. Franklin Menges, ....... York. WrMiPHOlO GIS ee. wrecker. eiela isles PLOL ew ALO UEC ese acetates Harrisburg. IMSteorologiSts) .....<3 ssscscc0ee ID LP tnes Diep aake ib Ore sachioeca eres Harrisburg. ae CO CHG wrist icfelstesevetsraciersrets Quakertown. WiiSTOZIGS Wee beeooaceccconcoocodacHopunood eaieiarsie ere snatetersiolars SBOORIOO OOOO DBOOCS aiavelerars PASAT Cr eicisteret cies siniereleis siavdece sieve 6% 7 Ofer CO Ce Ea ULeZise te ctaleletersjalere State College. (GBVGOETGS, Goduoooapd ssbobU80eok dic Ng ISIEWAZENAS Nod mdono cD OnG00 BS Lock Haven. Miva isl) Sieohlise GAgtoagsas ecictcees LINCETOVE, wo ie) fa=>) ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. STANDING COMMITTEES. LEGISLATION. Hony Ay S.icahler® Chairman sis sa.cnivee cote eee rete Hughesville. Hon. (Jason SCX) 2 sctercm ccs seals c/s sisieteideeisckien aerate North Wales. Hon. eo. Gi McGowan 5, -ictccane sewaverene dociton eee Seen Geiger’s Mills. Matthew “Rodgers: (2. asinsis(eem oa woiero re aroretion sro eeeialelercic maces ee Mexico. Ds, 85 SLY BOIGERS Foro%.as eivsieawemaisene arate rma otetelsmcerere te tear eaes Neale. CEREALS AND CEREAL CROPS. ASP. YOUNES, CHairmant) 4s consumes name cne aoe nice arn ais Millville. ROADS AND ROAD LAWS. Dias Kniippen burg, Chairman.) 1... site a alee ia oiaievevaleolaataterciersy sie Lake Carey. FRUIT AND FRUIT CULTURE. JOD WA BOVer,) CHAITIN AN Corcwccis cia cleietote s.see ciel siete sveter eral che Freeburg. DAIRY AND DAIRY PRODUCTS. Beds Weld, CHaAITMans oss nic, odie sonche ctelsveletetcisiels elareteintettetetots Sugargrove. Ee SChiwarz. «CHAPMAN wey skis ct cietaisiohe tales siaretente ote aivisiotetel ciel Analomink. WOOL AND TEXTILE FIBRES. ID tse dle abies (Ol otentibe eb ue Romoaca cmon sooo Ae dIC OCOD ouch onoD Raccoon. Drs Lower, Casas carierotat coches) erie. leveneretetatare stot state tel Hop Bottom. Dr Meee Conard ; (Chaar mista se stsrarsicteieetsloria = eietefatl ola aialesais's/ cscs ssc 1910 IN OMS BIGGO Soci station lela oe pemloutemiogaeee Carmichael, nGreenea (Cogs os. ccc.5 ceeaw ewes 1910 Peter B. Cowan, Brockville.) Jefferson (Co. . v.c.ccccccencnsice 1910 MM IN SCIATC oo sta cw aieceisiisan eenaeiassies peiemeee Claridge, Westmoreland Co., ............. 1910 8. X. McClellan, EGS TO LaATIOM OO. gs cclsiasisisiastetee sel ays creistsraicee 1910 The committee stili further report that they have examined the credeutials of the following persous. representing Agricultural Or- ‘ganizations, and recommend that they be admitted to sit as Advisory Members: No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 351 S. P. Heilman, Heilmandale, Lebanon county. M. D. Heilman, Heilmandale, Lebanon county. Ira J. Light, Lebanon, R. F. D. 5, Lebanon county. J. F. Brubaker, Lebanon, R. F. D. 7, Lebanon county. J. P. Brendle, Shaetferstown, Lebanon county. Moses Yingst, Prescott, Lebanon county. John H. Bennitch, Richland, Lebanon county. H. M. Keller, Biglerville, Adams county. J. A. HERR, S. S. BLYHOLDER, SAMUEL McCREARY, R. F. SCHWARZ, J. N. GLOVER, Committee on Credentials. It was moved and seconded that the report be received and adopt- ed as read, and that the members named in the report should be seated as recommended. Agreed to. On motion, duly seconded and agreed to, the following gentlemen were elected as Advisory Members: James E, Stephens, J. E. Fleisher and William Wertz, representing The Perry County ‘Agricultural Society, and Hon. W. C. Pomeroy and Scott McLaughlin, represent- ing Juniata County Agricultural Society. MR. SCHWARZ: I agree most heartily with Dr. Funk that there is nothing like the lime, sulphur and salt for the San José Scale; but if the statement is true that was made at an institute in Northamp- ton county, that Dr. Miller had started to spray with scalecide and found, after the season was over, that it had destroyed all indica- tions of fungus, it should be looked into. It is much easier to prepare than the lime, sulphur and salt, and if it is any good, I think the Department should authorize it, and tell the farmers to use it, if they can’t do any better. The CHAIRMAN: In connection with what has been said, the Chair has had some experience with scalecide, and that is just this: In the first instance, it does not go near as far as they say it would. MR. HALL: I just wish to suggest to Dr. Funk where he said it costs from a dollar a gallon to fifty cents a barrel, that he probably meant to reverse these figures. MR. HERR: I don’t think it is the policy for the Board to recom- mend any patent preparation on any subject to any member of the Board. It is true these things are cn the market, and we have no objection to the individual using them giving the party a testi- monial, if he wishes, but I don’t believe the Board should commit themselves. DR. FUNK: From the soluble oils, for which the formula will soon _ be published, the user will get better results than from the prepara- tions that are now on the market. Those on the market are all manufactured according to one formula, but if you make the soluble oil preparations yourself, you can make them mild or drastic, just as you want them. Now, if you have an apple tree that is in an 352 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. advanced stage, you will want it much more drastic than you will for a peach tree that is just starting. If you make it yourself, you can make the ratio high or light, just as you wish. You can make it 14 to 1, or 20 to 1, just as you like. So I think they will be better than the preparations cn the market. MR. HUTCHISON: There was a suggestion made that we create a Department of Horticulture. I presume this will be a part of the Board of Agriculture, and I think this should be done because the Department of Horticulture is an important one, and I think the Board should take some action toward creating this Department. MR. CLARK: I don’t want to offer any results, but I want to tell you what we did on our farm in Soutl:ern Indiana the past few years. We tried to see first what we could do with lime, sulphur and salt, but it is so troublesome to prepare that we finally decided to see what could be done with kerosene. We did so, and I want to tell you the result. The Scale, I suppose, is as nearly destroyed in our orchards there, as in any other orchards, where they have used other preparations. We lost a few trees by too much oil, but very few in comparison to the whole number. But I noticed this: the loose bark on the trees nearly all fell off, and the trees are quite smooth. There is no place for the little insects to harbor. We are so well satisfied that we shall continue to use it. MR. HUTCHISON: Did you dilute it? MR. CLARK: No, not on the larger trees, but on the smaller trees we used about 1 to 20, and the smaller trees were the ones we lost. The CHAIRMAN: Will the gentleman please tell us on what kind of trees he used it? MR. CLARK: Peach, apple and tear. We are too far south to raise a good apple, but our apples were as fair as any on the market; the peach crop was a failure this yexr in our neighborhood. But this is the home of the Kieffer pear, and we shipped the largest Kieffer pears on the Louisville market. Two other parties shipped probably as good; none better. Now, I tell you this just to show you what can be done. The good pears that were taken to the market commanded ‘a good price. I tell you that we shall continue its use. Unless farmers do something, they will have to go out of the business, and it is the hardest thing in the world to get a farmer to use lime, sulphur and salt. There are only two things to keep in mind in the use of kerosene: to be careful and to use a small quantity. We can easily use it. MR. SNAVELY: I want to put this question to Dr. Funk: whether the use of these crude oils is not going to prove eventually destruc- tive to the tree? DR. FUNK: It certainly will; we know that all oils will injure the tissue of all vegetable matter. We know that pure kerosene will destroy the scale, and if a man will select for his work an ideal day, and force the pressure through an exceedingly fine orifice, making an exceedingly fine mist, it may be all right, but the danger is that he No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 353 may destroy all his fruit. There is where I consider the soluble oils will come in. We will then know exactly what we are doing. When mixed with fourteen or twenty gallons of water, you have a prepara- tion that will not injure the tree as much as a pure oil will. If I were going to use a pure oi!, I would use kerosene, instead of crude oil, because it will not leave a varnish. MR. WELD: I want to ask Dr. Funk whether this year has been peculiar in the development of the Oyster Shell Scale? It has been present in my orchard, and some of my friends’, and I think it is thicker than I have ever seen it before, and we must, in our county, report the death of some trees from it. I don’t think we are infected, because we were examined early in June, and no scale reported. Now, is it peculiar to this winter, and what had we better do with it? Is there any danger of it increasing, and destroying the orchards further? DR. FUNK: The Oyster Shell Scale is one of the three scales that infest our orchards here—the San José Scale, the Oyster Shell Scale, and the Scurfy Scale. But where the trees are thoroughly and com- pletely sprayed with lime, sulphur and salt, it will destroy the San José Scale, the Oyster Shell Scale, and the Scurfy Scale, and we have also found that it will destroy the Tent Caterpillar. It used to be considered impossible to destroy the nest of the Green Aphis, but we find that if we use the lime, sulphur and salt, we will destroy all of them. MR. WELD: There is danger, then, of that Scale increasing, and giving us very serious trouble? DR. FUNK: It certainly will destroy the trees. MR. SNAVELY: Which increases the quicker, the San José Scale or the Scurfy Scale? DR. FUNK: Where we have four or five progenies of the San José Seale, we have here but one; when we come down to latitude 38 degrees, we have two, but here we have only one. MR. WELD: How many broods hag the Oyster Shell? DR. FUNK: Only one on an average, but in long seasons, you may have two. MR. RODGERS: What time of the year do you put on the lime, sulphur and salt, and what time the oils? DR. FUNK: I would prefer using the oils just as late as I could; just before the blossoms swell; there is more resistant power at that time. AsI say, I am a little scary on the oil question, but some trees are more resistant than others. Take the Ben Davis, and the York Imperial; they are both infected. You examine the Ben Davis, and you will find it infected down to the red, while the other will hardly be touched. Why the San José Scale discriminates thus, I leave to you. 23—7T—1906. 354 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. MR. RODGERS: What kind of a day woula you use—a clear, sun- shiny day? DR. FUNK: Most certainly; I want a quiet, sunshiny day, or it will not dissolve the oils as quickly as necessary. MR. SNAVELY: A few other matters I want to ask the Doctor: Whether it is safe to spray any time after the foliage is off the trees? Now, my experience is that it is not safe to spray peach trees with salt. We cut it out altogether, and use only the lime and sulphur. In my experience, it is not safe to use salt; it has killed a large num- ber of buds. DR. FUNK: Can’t you go further, and say terminals? MR. SNAVELY: No; but I can say that it is not safe to use salt on peach, or Japan plum trees in the fall. DR. FUNK: I think if you will go back to my last year’s report, you will find that I say the terminals on peach trees were killed by the use of salt in the fall, and I would not think it safe to spray a tree in the fall, but in the spring, when they have the most resistant power. : MR. RODGERS: Heretofore, at our meetings, you have recom- mended lime, sulphur, and salt, and now you do away with the salt; for what reason do you do away with the salt? DR. FUNK: Because it is useless; I find it is even injurious on tender leaves, owing to the chlorine in salt, and it is a large expense, and I find that the lime and sulphur adheres equally long without it. I can show you trees in my orchard that we sprayed last spring, where it is still on. Experience, you know, improves us, all along the line. MR. GLOVER: I would like to know whether you know of any one who is fixed up to go around and spray for farmers? DR. FUNK: There is a party near Germantown who is doing that kind of work, but I don’t believe it will ever be a success. Anybody may fix up a machine to do this, but I don’t believe it will ever be a success, because weather conditions will not warrant it. You can spray with an October wind, but you can’t spray against it; now, _when we were spraying our orchard last winter, the wind blew in one direction for all the time except three days. We had all our orchard covered on one side, and only three days to spray the other in. Now take a case like this; he may go and spray for John Jones or Peter Smith, and may spray on one side for fifteen days, and then have only three days to spray the other in, and his engagements would make it necessary for him to go to some other orchard; what would be the result? Why, the orchard being only sprayed on one side, and the work incomplete, the man would refuse to pay for it, because the work was not done according to contract. Any man can get a hand pan of eighty to one hundred pounds pressure, and then he can go around and spray his trees. Then he No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 355 will be successful. So long as you have some one to work for you by contract, you will never be successful. He will want to go from one job to the other, and this will leave just so many trees more for the following summer. The CHAIRMAN: If there is no further discussion, we will go on with the next number on the program, which is Unfinished Business. It appeared that there was no Unfinished Business to be brought before the house. MR. HUTCHISON: We have with us Professor Hunt of the Experi- ment Station, who was also with us last year, and we shall be pleased to have him say a word. PROF. HUNT: I think, with your permission, I will not take up any of your time this morning. It is very kind of you to give me the opportunity to address you, but as I am to speak to-morrow morning, I will not take up your time now. I thank you for the kindness, and trust I shall become better acquainted with you before the end of the Convention. MR. SNAVELY: If there is no other business before the Board, we might as well proceed with the election of officers. The CHAIRMAN: That does not take place until Wednesday morn- ing, according to the By-laws; but since there is no Unfinished Business, we shall be glad to hear from any one before we take a Tecess, DR. FUNK: I would like to hear from some of these people who have sprayed with lime, sulphur aad salt, or who have had demon- strations on their places. MR. SEXTON: I would like to inform the Doctor of my experience with lime, sulphur and salt. The subject is an important one, and one well worth talking about, and while we are on it, we may be able to learn a great deal if we continue the discussion. About two years ago, when our trees should have been sprayed, I was too busy to attend to it myself. There is a nurseryman not far away, who has the paraphernalia and goes around the township spraying trees, so I had him come and spray mine; my trees were badly infected, and are still, although they have been twice sprayed with lime, sulphur and salt. How do you account for that? DR. FUNK: I hope this will bring up one of the Conundrums. MR. SEAVY: Some of my neighbors and I found that «ve had the San José Scale, and we had a man down from Erie County to look at our trees; he said, “You have the San José Scale, and your trees will die.” But he set at it, and we all went there to see the work. He mixed the lime, sulphur and salt; it was an ideal day, and we watched him spray. Of the plum trees, some were dead, some dying; some he cut down. This man sprayed twice, and there is no more scale there. This year we had a large crop, which we sold for two dollars a bushel. I suppose we lost about twenty-five or thirty trees before we knew what was the matter, and before we saw the State demon- stration of lime, sulphur and salt, 356 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc: The CHAIRMAN: I understand the Doctor to ask for any expres- sion in regard to the demonstrations; we had them in our county. I had one on my place. Climatic conditions were against me, but the neighbors came to see the demonstration. It was impossible to spray one side of the trees; as fast as we sprayed, it blew away, and the result was that there was very litthke good accomplished. One of my neighbors had a young orchard which was badly infested with the Scale, and he concluded he would try it again. There was one tree that I thought was about dead, and advised him to cut it down, but he said “there is life in it yet,’ and took advantage of the weather, and sprayed it again, and to-day it is as thrifty a young orchard as there is in the State. We have cut out the salt, as has already been said. MR, LUTZ: I would like to talk, tut I am troubled with paralysis, and it is hard for me to speak; the paralysis has affected my speech; but I would like to hear more of the subject, because Bedford County, where I come from, is badly troubled with the Scale. One man had twenty thousand trees and they all had Scale. The SECRETARY: This is a matter in which the Department is very deeply interested. I hope it wil be freely and thoroughly dis- cussed. What has the Department accomplished in this last year? You will realize that the Department should not expect to rid the entire State of the Scale the first year, or, in fact, that the State should do it at all. All we expected was, that the demonstrator should go over the Staie, and get the people interested, so as to do the work for themselves. They should know where the Scale is present, and what to do. It has been a sort of school, and we are anxious to know what results have been accomplished. I was very glad when Dr. Funk said he would like to hear. And I would like to hear from the people who have had demonstrations in their neighborhoods, or on their farms. MR. HERR: Will not this same subject come up this evening, under the head of the Entomologist’s Report? The SECRETARY: The only reason [ hope there will be consider- able said on this subject, is because we have the time. DR. FUNK: We have the people here, also, and the experts. MR. SCHWARZ: If the demonstrations made by the experts have not been a success, it is because we could not get the people inter- ested. I was sorry for the young man who came to our neighbor- hood. I gave him my orchard, and we advertised it for weeks, but we had only three people there. The most we had was eight people, and they came there out of curiosity, and not as a matter of real interest. It seems impossible to impress on the people of Pennsyl- vania the terrible danger that is confronting them. If it has not been a success, it is only because the farmers of Pennsylvania take no interest in it. MR. CHUBBUCK: I would like to ask Dr. Funk, whether there is anything in the manner of operating, or whether it is that the operation itself has no effect, in a cave where it didn’t do any good? No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 357 DR. FUNK: It makes all the difference; if we spray right, with the proper mixture, we have a killing agent; if we do not spray right, we do not have the killing agent, and are short our time and money. In this regard I submit to an impartial demonstration. I would like to see this point discussed. If this thing goes on, in a few years we will have no farm orchards, and I think it is a most important ques- tion. Of course, if we let it come to that, it will be a bonanza to the few experts who, through time and attention, can continue to raise fruit, but I fear the farmer will only realize that when it is too late. MR. STOUT: The Zoologist sent oui a man to my place to fumigate the trees, posssibly three hurdred, but the results are not satis- factory—not as satisfactory as spraying. We sprayed ourselves, and we had very satisfactory results. We had been spraying before he fumigated, and he said the results would be all right, but they were not. DR. FUNK: There is another subject I would like to talk of— fumigation. Now, we know that you can successfully fumigate a large tree, but in regard to nursery stock, it igs only too often the case that the trees have been fumigated before they were sent out, and fumigated to death, so that they will not grow, and the question resolves itself into this: shall we have fumigation, or shall we not? Before I fumigated, if I lost ten per cent., I lost much; since I am fumigating, I am losing forty per cent. Why, this season I had some fine apple trees—as fine apple trees as you could find, before fumigation; since fumigating, forty per cent. of them have died. Out of one hundred unfumigated trees not one died. Now, is this not a danger? If the remedy is worse than the disease, is it not a danger? Now, the question is whether we shall not kill the whole of what we are trying to save. MR. SNAVELY: I think the Doctor has struck the keynote of this whole business of fumigating. A large per cent. of the trees sent out by nurserymen are trees that will noi grow. MR. HERR: I want to ask the Doctor if there are not certain varieties of apples that the Scale takes to, more than others? Isn’t the Ben Davis the one it takes to most of all? It is not as particular as Iam; I haven’t much use for the Ben Davis. But why is this? DR. FUNK: The Scale is general!y carried by some outside influ- ence, by birds, or something of that kind. It has no wings to fly, but, of course, where the insects are carried, they stay and do their work, and it is a fact that they will take to the Ben Davis quicker than to any other kind. I think the Ben Davis has a weaker constitution, and less resisting power. MR. SNAVELY: Dr. Funk has not, I think, touched on one im-. portant feature, and that is the summer spraying. A great many people make the mistake of putting sulphur on their trees to destroy the rot, and the next thing they know, they have no foliage on their. trees. 358 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe, DR. FUNK: Do I understand this to be merely in reference to the Manila or Brown Rot, or do I understand it to be also in reference to the Scale? MR. SNAVELY: For both. DR. FUNK: Of course, in summer spraying it is impossible to use lime, sulphur and salt, so we have to resort to other means. Now, there is nothing, in my opinion, that will quite equal a high ratio soluble oil, so far as the scale is concerned, because you can use it frequently, and still not destroy the foliage, and you will destroy all the lice, but you can’t destroy all the scale at once, so you must spray every few days to destroy all that are being born. Now, as to the matter of the time of spraying: It has the same advantageous effect on the cherry, peach and plum, and we can begin immediately after the bloom drops with a Bordeaux mixture, composed of two pounds of sulphate of copper, six cf lime, and six gallons of water. But during the peach season we can’t use this; we must have it so well diluted that it will not affect the tree; several years ago I used on my trees a mixture made of four cunces of sulphate of copper and fifty gallons of water. You will say that is exceedingly weak, and yet, inside a week the trees did not have a single leaf on them, but they were so well developed that the fruit went ahead and ripened. I reduced it to three ounces of sulphate of copper and fifty gallons of water, and again I removed three-fourth of the foliage. The next season [ used two ounces, and fifty gallons of water, and since that time I have lost no leaves. It is very weak; you could drink it with- out harm, and yet it has proven strong enough to kill typhoid germs, and I see it is now recommended for that purpose. The Committee appointed to wait on the Governor reported that they have been unable to see him; he is occupied with some people from New York State; but they will return again and try to see him before lunch. The CHAIRMAN: The Secretary’s report, under the head of New Business, gives the next place of meeting; but before we proceed with that I wish to announce that the Legislative Committee will meet this afternoon right after the session, at the close of the af- ternoon session; members who have anything to report to them will be welcome. MR. FENSTERMAKER: If the place of meeting is next in order, I would present the claims of my city. The city of Allentown has a great many advantages in many respects. We have excellent rail- road facilities and good hotels, and you know the Lehigh County Dutch are noted for their good cooking, and you can have your choice of peanuts or beer, or both. Then, about the time of the Spring Meeting, the great cattle importer, Mr. Cooper, of Coopersburg, has his annual cattle sale. His place is easily reached by trolley from Allentown in half an hour, and we could attend the sale in the after- noon and get back in time for the evening session. It would be a good object lesson for us to see the fine cattle there that sell for thou- sands of dollars. These sales will not continue indefinitely; in fact, they may end at any time. Mr. Cooper reports that when he has a sale and gets good prices they raise the price on him,so that he may No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 359 not be able to get cattle from them anymore. I am in receipt of a letter from him giving us a very cordial invitation to be present at the next sale. Then, there will be no trouble in securing a good place to hold our meetings. We can have the court house. And we have the public parks, and some large stores, that are well worth seeing, and at the other end of town there is Allentown’s famous duck farm, where they have between forty and fifty thousand young ducks in the var- ious stages of growth. I trust we shall have the pleasure of seeing you all at Allentown in the spring. MR. SCHWARZ: I second the nomination of Allentown. MR. SEXTON: When is this cattle sale to be held? MR. FENSTERMAKER: Usually on Decoration Day. MR. SEXTON: I am a Grand Army man, and as such I can’t go to a sale on that day. Asa Grand Army man I have other business. I march to the graves of my fallen comrades. If that is the object that takes us to Allentown I can’t go there. MR. FENSTERMAKER: That is not the object; it is merely dis- cretionary; no one is compelled to go to this sale. The CHAIRMAN: It is usually customary to hold the spring meet- ing on Decoration Day. MR. BARNES: I wish to offer as a place of meeting, the city of York. We have a court house that is unsurpassed by any in the State, and we have first-class hotels. I therefore offer York as the place for the summer meeting. The SECRETARY: We had the pleasure of meeting several years ago at Somerset, in the southwestern part of the State. It gave us a great deal of pleasure to have you there, and Iam happy to say that it would give us pleasure to have you return there. I would, there- fore, offer Somerset. MR. McCREARY: Inasmuch as Mr. Riddle, of Butler, is anxious to have us come there, and is not present at this time, I would be glad to have the balloting held over until he can present the claims of his home town of Butler. He will be here some time today. MR. HERR: When is the time of the summer meeting fixed? The SECRETARY: That is left to the Director of Institutes; he fixes the time and we fix the place. DEPUTY SECRETARY MARTIN: There is one question in re- gard to these meetings with which we have had considerable diffi- culty for a number of years. Now, in the town of Clearfield, where we had our last meeting, it was far from our desire to hold that meeting on Decoration Day, and in fact we had arranged two other dates, but found that on one of those dates it conflicted with the date of court in Clearfield, and in the other with another objection equally unconquerable, so we were between the upper and nether millstone of postponing our meeting until that time. We should have, at all 360 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. places where these meetings are held, the option of the court house or the opera house. Circumstances seemed to compel us in that di- rection, although we didn’t want to have the meeting on Memorial Day. It is gratifying to us to have so many requests for the meet- ing, but that offer should always be made with the understanding that we can have either the opera house or the court house, so that we may have no difficulty in arranging the date of the meeting. MR. HERR: I know that we can have the court house at any time we want it, if it is the desire of the board to meet at Lock Haven, which is just as accessible, and where we will be entertained just as well as at any other place, and even a little better. We have no desire to crowd out any other place, but if it is the desire of the Board to meet at Lock Haven we shall be glad to have them. MR. SEXTON: I wish to ask the Deputy Secretary of Agriculture, in fixing the day, not to fix it on the day devoted to the memory of my fallen comrades, so that we can all attend the meeting. Now, at the meeting at Clearfield, we lost a day of good work that we should have had, by attending a memorial meeting away from home. We could not hold the interest of the people; their hearts were else- where, and I am sure, 'Mr. Secretary, that if we hold this meeting at that time again we shall have the same trouble. People want to attend the memorial services, and want to do so at home. MR. FENSTERMAKER: I am heartily in accord with the senti- ments of that gentleman, but we have memorial services at Allen- town, too, and those who wish to attend them can do so, and still go to Coopersburg to the sale. And I will guarantee a hall for any date you set, if you come to Allentown. The SECRETARY: If you come to Somerset you will find a new court house and a good opera house, to either of which you will be welcome. DEPUTY SECRETARY MARTIN: Just a word of explanation. With the exception of one place of meeting held in Pennsytvania, we had the opera house or the court house free of charge, and it is important that we should have it free of charge. The people of Clearfield were very kind and very generous, and it was understood that all we were to pay there was to see that the janitor was reward- ed for his services in the matter of light and heat. It was the same at Huntingdon, and all other places except one, and I wish the gen- tlemen requesting us to meet with them would bear in mind that we expect to have our meeting place free of charge. MR. FENSTERMAKER: You will not be expected to pay at Al- lentown; I will guarantee a good hall in which to hold the meet- ings free of charge to the Board. MR. HUTCHISON: I move that the roll be called and each mem- ber answer to his name. Duly seconded and agreed to. The ballot resulted as follows: Allentown, 21 votes; Somerset, 4; York, 4; Butler, 1; Lock Haven, 1. Allentown having received the No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 361 highest number of votes, was declared to be the next place of meet- ing. MR. HUTCHISON: I would like to change my vote to Allentown. MR. RODGERS: I move that we make Allentown unanimous. Duly seconded and agreed to and Allentown was unanimously selected as the place of the spring meeting. On motion, properly seconded, it was agreed to adjourn until 1:30 p. m. 1:30 P. M., Tuesday, January 22, 1907. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Mr. Kahler. The CHAIRMAN: If Prof. Boyer is in the room we will hear the report of the Committee on Fruit and Fruit Culture. Prof. Boyer did not appear to be present. The CHAIRMAN: Is Dr. Pearson here? Dr. Pearson was not present at the time. The CHAIRMAN: Next on the program is Prof. Butz, of State College; is he here? Prof. Butz was not present at the time. The CHAIRMAN: Next in order is the report of J. W. Nelson, Chairman of the Committee on Apiary. We will now have his report. This report is as follows: REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON APIARY. By MR. J. W. NELSON, Chairman. The season of 1906 has been a very good one for bee-keepers. The winter of 1905 and 1906 was mild and the winter losses were light for outside wintering, the early spring favorable for brood rearing and the bad weather that followed not as severe as usual. Those who have worked for surplus honey have had good returns, while those who have worked for increase have been unusually successful, in my case amounting to fourfold, all in good condition, with some surplus honey. There~has been an unusually large number of colonies of bees in the woods this summer. I have transferred eight colonies from trees to frame hives. One of them was hanging on a tree about twenty- five feet high, and had been there about twenty-one days. I had one case of foul brood, and tried the following plan: I shook the old bees and queen out and then took the old and diseased brood to a new location. I had shaken about all the bees off, and as the larvae were. badly diseased I closed the entrance for two days to keep out robbers,. and then opened it just enough for one bee ata time. After seven 24 362 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. seven days I destroyed all the queen celis, and after a few days more I gave them a frame with a few unsealed larvae to keep them in good condition. At the end of twenty-one days I destroyed the cells on this cone and gave them some selected larvae to raise a queen from ,and the built up nicely and were one of the best colonies I had when the season closed. I did not fare so well with the old bees and queen. I put them on some empty frames in an old hive for two days, and then put them in a good frame hive. I think all would have gone well, but I wanted to give them a chance to hurry up, and so put in some old combs I thought were clean. When I examined them again I had a good case of foul brood on my hands. As the buckwheat season was close at hand, [ thought I would wait until then, as I find it pays to kill the old queen at that season anyway, but when the time came I could find no sign of the disease. I be- lieve this is often the case in a flow of honey. I think the excite- ment caused by the unusual supply of nectar has something to do with it, but what becomes of the bacteria in the honey? Whether the disease that has done so much damage, but if I can get samples next summer [ will send them to Dr. White, of Washington, D. C., for analysis. The season closed with fine weather in September, giving us a flow of honey from fall flowers, late in the season, and plenty of young bees to go into winter quarters with. During the summer I discov- ered what is to me a new enemy of the bee, viz: the Cherry Bird or Cedar Wax Wing. Having heard that they were fond of bees, I doubted it, as it is often hard to get definite information on these matters. But having occasion to cut a bee tree one foggy morning, I found a large flock of these birds watching the tree, and as fast as a bee would come out they would catch it. I could see the bee plainly until it disappeared in the bird’s bill. I watched them until I was sure as to what they were doing, when I tried to drive them away, but I had hard work to keep them away, as they seemed to think the bees good food. As these birds are plenty, it will pay bee keepers to keep an eye on them. The United States government is getting very much interested in Agriculture, having carried out numerous experiments in different lines. Dr. White has been carrying out experiments with the bac- teria of brood diseases. Prof. Phillips has also been busily engaged and Prof. Frank Benton has been traveling in foreign lands, mostly in Russian Caucasus, in search of new races of bees. There are several races of bees in Northeastern Europe that prom- ise some improvement, mostly in the way of gentleness, especially the Caucasian and Abahasian races. The former has been tried by several bee keepers in this country with varying results. It will perhaps be as well for the average bee keeper to confine his energies to the good old Italian bees, and let the specialists experiment with the new races, as they might get a repetition of the English Sparrow nuisance. There are some twelve to eighteen specimens of stingless bees in South America, but little is yet known about them. As we now have a national pure food law, that is a bright pros- pect for the intelligent honey producer. There is only one drawback, viz, brood diseases. The State government should lose no time in passing a strict foul brood law. I think there should be an inspector of apiaries, with as many assistants as necessary to do the work, No. 7. - DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 363 that both the inspector and assistants should be practical bee men of long experience and should be appointed by and under the con- trol of the Department of Agriculture, and be paid by the State. Below is a list of questions sent out by the Department of Agri- culture, at Washington, D. C., to the inspectors of apiaries of the State of New York: 1. How should an inspector of apiaries be appointed? Gn petition Of 2..'-.: persons. On application of bee keepers’ associations. On application of associations to their Deparment of Agriculture, as the State should pay for the work just the same as in the case of diseased cattle, and should therefore have supervision of the work.. 2. Who should appoint the inspector of apiaries? Department of Agriculture. 3. Should an inspector be chosen by competitive examination? Yes. 4. What provision should be made for the removal of an inspector for cause? If incompetent, the Department of Agriculture should remove him, but if competent he should be retained, as he will become more val- uable as he gains in experience ir handling men. 5. When any contagious disease is found in apiary, how long a time should be allowed the owner or manager to treat the disease? This should be left to the discretion of the inspector, as a set rule might do an injustice. 6. If the owner or manager refuses to treat or destroy diseased colonies, should the inspector be employed to treat or destroy, as occasion demands? Most certainly. 7. Should an infected apiary, which has not been cared for, be de- clared a nuisance? It is not necessary to declare it a nuisance, as it is such, and the inspector will attend to it. 8. What should be the penalty for refusing to follow directions of an inspector to treat or destroy? UATE 5) 393 Bee) Imprisonment ...... One or both. Both at the discretion of the court. 9. Should an inspector be empowered to order all bees in hives without frames put into hives with movable frames in localities where disease is present? If the inspector has tact and diplomacy, it would be all right, and if not, all wrong. 10. Should there be a penalty for concealing contagious disease from the inspector? Yes. 11. Should there be a penalty for concealing contagious disease from a prospective purchaser? Yes. 12. Should there be a penalty for moving bees from diseased api- aries to another part of the same State without the consent ef the inspector? Yes. 364 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. 18. Should there be a penalty for moving bees without the con- sent of the inspector from apiaries in localities where disease is known to exist, even though no disease has as yet been found in said apiary? Yes. 14. Should it be unlawful to move bees into another State withoyt the consent of the inspector of the State from which they come? Yes. 15. Should all colonies entering a State be examined by an inspec- tor? Yes. 16. Should there be a penalty for failing to notify the inspector of such shipment of colonies? Certainly, or law falls flat. 17. Should there be a penalty for exposing contagious material, either honey, or appliances of the apiary? Yes. 18. Should there be a penalty for selling, bartering or giving away contagious material, or material which has been exposed to infec- tion, without the consent of the inspector? Yes. 19. Should there be a penalty for refusing admission to the inspec- tor or hindering him in the discharge of his duty? Most emphatically. 20. Should it be declared a misdemeanor for any one, owner or otherwise, to have knowledge of the existence of disease, without notifying the inspector? Yes. 21. Should the inspector be required by law to disinfect his per- son and all implements used, which would carry contamination? Yes. 22. Should it be illegal for any person to rear queens for sale in an apiary where contagious disease exists or has existed within the same season? He should be required to have his bees inspected, and have the consent of the inspector, twice each year. 23. Should the inspector make a public report of apiaries where contagious disease has been found, or should the report be made to the proper officials without publicity? The report should be made to the proper officials. 24. Should the inspectors be at the expense of the State or county appointing an inspector, or should it be at the expense of the indi- vidual bee keeper? At the expense of the State. 25. Should a special tax per colony be levied to pay the expense of inspection? No. Should a tax be placed on each head of cattle to pay for in- spection? The above questions were sent by the Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., to the inspectors of apiaries of the State of New York, which questions cover the subject completely, and the answers to which I hope will meet with your approval. Respectfully submitted, No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 365 The CHAIRMAN: What skall be done with this report? MR. SEXTON: I move it be received and placed on file. Motion duly seconded and agreed to. The CHAIRMAN: Next in order is the report of the Committee on Roads and Road Laws. The SECRETARY: Is Mr. Knuppenburg in the room? Yes; I see he is. I wish to state that we would like to have the Commissioner of Highways or his Deputy present when this paper is read. They are both out of the city today, but will be here tomorrow. Will you be here tomorrow, Mr. Knuppenburg? MR. KNUPPENBURG: Yes, sir. The SECRETARY: Then I move that this paper be held over until tomorrow, because there will be a great many questions that should be referred to them. Motion duly seconded and agreed to. The CHAIRMAN: We will take the next paper on the program, the Report of the Committee on Wool and Textile Fibres, by D. &. Taylor, Chairman. Mr. Taylor read his report, as follows: REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON WOOL AND TEXTILE FIBRES. By MR. D. 8. TAYLOR, Chairman. Your Committee would report that there has been some increase in the production of wool in the United States, as well as in the State of Pennsylvania. But there should be more wool produced in Penn- sylvania, because some parts of our State produce better wool than can be produced in any part of the United States. And as we im- port a large amount of wool into the United States of different grades, we should produce in this country enough of wool to fill the demands of our manufacturers in the United States, and have wool for export, rather than import it. The wool producticn of the United States in the year 1904 was 291,783,032 pounds; imported in 1904, 249,135,746 pounds; 540,918,778 pounds. We take it that this amount was manufactured in the United States, as we do not find we export any wool. The production of wool in the United States was, in 1905, 295,488,- 438 pounds; 1904, 291,783,032 pounds; an increase of 3,705,406 pounds. 366 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. From the best statistical reports at our command we find in the United States on January ist, 1906, 50,631,619 sheep. Average price per head, $3.54; total value, $179,056,144. Of this number Pennsylvania had on January 1, 1906, 1,102,982 head of sheep, value per head, $4.63; total value, $5,102,529. And on January 1st, 1905, Pennsylvania had 895,982 head of sheep; value per head, $3.81; total value, $3,415,394, being an increase of 206,076 sheep and of price, 82 cents per head, and of value, $1,687,135. The wool production of Pennsylvania on January 1, 1905, was re- ported as from 850,000 sheep at an average of six pounds per sheep, or 5,100,000 pounds, at 30 cents per pound, $1,530,000. Pennsylvania is reported as having on January Ist, 1906, 1,100,000 sheep at an average of six pounds of wool per sheep, or 6,600,000 pounds of wool; selling price advanced to 32 cents per pound, mak- ing the income from the crop of wool for 1906 $2,112,000, being an increase from 1905 of $582,000. The increase of wool production in my county (Washington) of 1906 over 1905 was about 10 per cent., and an advance of 2 cents per pound. This information was obtained from wool merchants. The increase of sheep would have been more were it not for the increase of dogs in our county. Our county in 1906 paid for loss of stock by dogs $6,505, and in 1905, $5,656, an increase of $849. We had exhibited at one of our Farmers’ Institutes in our county samples of fine wool grown in the locality where shown, which showed the length to be from the brood ewes 34 inches; sample from the stock ram, 3 inches, and from eight-months-old lambs, 34 inches. The standard length of staple, I understand, for fine or delaine wool, is 3 inches at one year’s growth. Your Committee would recommend to our Legislative Committee to try and have better protection from damage done by dogs to the human family and to our live stock. In our section of the State we have suffered much from mad dogs the past season. Many persons have been bitten and have been compelled to take treatment to pre- vent serious results. Near my home a worthy farmer and stock breeder was bitten by a stray dog; he thought it was not serious, but in a few weeks he became affected and suffered unknown agonies until.death relieved him. His entire family and those who assisted in caring for him have been taken to a city hospital for treatment to prevent the spread of the dreadful disease. Much stock of all kinds in this section where this occurred, has already died, and it is expected that there are more cases developing. The CHAIRMAN: You have all heard this report; what shall be done with it? MR. CLARK: I move that we receive this report and place it on file. The motion was duly seconded, and agreed to. The CHAIRMAN. Are there any remarks on these reports which we have just heard? Probably by that time some of the Specialists will come in. MR. WELD: I just want to endorse what Mr. Taylor said in re- gard to dogs. I was unfortunate enough to be a township auditor, No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 367 and from last March to November I was called upon five times to prove sheep that were killed by dogs. There does not seem to be any law to cover this, and it is a matter of interest to Warren as well as to Washington county. I think the Legislative Committee could do nothing that would benefit one branch, at least, of our live stock industry more than to better protect the sheep industry from the ravages of dogs. The unfortunate part of it is, in my section, that it is a lot of irresponsible and non-ownable curs that do this dam- age, and unless there is some law by which these curs can be shot at sight there is not much redress. The farmer who keeps a dog cares for him and feeds him, and houses him at night, and he knows where he is. It is the dogs that belong to people who are too poor to own anything else, that cause the trouble. Yhey expect them to sponge their living off other people, and I want to endorse what this gentle- man has just said, that it is important that there should be some restriction. We are the only county in the State under the Blair county law MR. CLARK: What is the purport of that law? MR. WELD: It is simply this: That if you have sheeep killed by a dog you call upon the township auditor and have him come and as- sess the damages. Now, all dogs are taxed 50 cents each, which goes into the county fund as a special tax to defray damages done by dogs. Now, if you have a sheep killed by a dog, you call upon the county auditors, and they come and inquire whose dog it was and assess the damages. _MR. CLARK: Well, isn’t that the State law? That is the State law. MR. WELD: I think in some respects it is different from the State law. The SECRETARY: [I think the State law provides for one dollar or two dollars, according to the sex of the animal. Mr. CRARK: Without any option for the auditors? The SECRETARY: If the owner is willing to pay the price of the dog, the dog is saved; if not, he is killed. MR. WELD: In our county that is not the law; if I catch a dog within my enclosure, I can kill him on sight. To illustrate this: There is adog in our town that has been caught three times doing damage, but we can’t catch him on the premises. MR. CHUBBUCK: I have had some little experience in this line; Iam a raiser to some extent, having sometimes as high as a hundred head. I am also an auditor, and I have spent many days for the dol- lar to prove sheep that were killed by worthless dogs. Now, a large part of the trouble in our county is with hunting dogs. They chase the sheep. They may not kill it outright, but they chase it so that it either dies from it, or is injured so that it has to be killed. They get in among the sheep and scatter them in every direction. I have had this experience within the last few days, and last year, when I was down here attending a meeting of the Board, the dogs got into the tract where my sheep were and worried them so that when I got 368 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. heme I had a dead sheep on my hands. Now, the fact is, that under the State law you can’t kill a dog. If your neighbor, or his cattle come into your enclosure you can obtain some redress if they do any damage, but when a dog kills your sheep, you have none. You may keep your dog law, but I tell you this: If I catch a dog among my sheep, chasing them, I will kill him if I can get him, regardless of the consequences. They ought not to be running at large at night. I had a ease this fall where the hunting dogs chased my sheep until one of them died as the result ef it. My hired man heard them in the night, but he didn’t tell me of it, and in the morning we found them scattered everywhere and it took us some time to get them back again. DR. FUNK: How comes it that dogs are not taxed? MR. CHUBBUCK: They are taxed; don’t you live in Pennsylvania? DR. FUNK: I don’t know anybody in Boyertown that pays tax, and the town is full of dogs. They get out of it in this way, by say- ing they don’t own the dogs. IMR. CLARK: It seems to me that this comes up at every meet- ing; somebody has something to say about it. We should arrive at some conclusion so that we need not have it up at every meeting. Why is it that we are unable to accomplish anything? Our represen- tatives should surely be able to frame a law that would be satisfac- tory to the people. But, now, there are two sides to the question. I had often heard of these great kennel shows, and for the past five or six years I have attended them. They were a revelation to me. You see there not only the finest animals, but the finest and best dressed and best bred people of the city of Pittsburg. They are all against anything like this; they say, “I take care of my dog; I don’t allow him to go into your field, or into your yard, and yet you demand that I pay a royalty upon your sheep. Iam willing to pay a tax on the dog, but when you expect me to pay a royalty on your sheep, it is going too far. I pay a tax on the dog, and then you expect me to insure your sheep.” ‘That is their side. Our side is that we want to prevent these dogs from killing our sheep. We have tried killing the dog, but I don’t believe in any such demonstration as that; that ought to be a thing of the past. I believe in punishing the man, and not the dog. I believe when a man has a dog and don’t keep him on his premises, except when he is out with him, we ought to make a law to punish the man so effectively that he will keep him on his own premises or kill him. Now, why can’t we make a law so strong that it will accomplish this? It will satisfy the man who owns the dog, and the man who owns the sheep. What does our law amount to? Let us go back a moment. In my boyhood days, and even after I grew up, we had lots of sheep on our farms, and made money out of them; but I grew away from sheep raising. It was not because of dogs; it was because the timber was going, and we had nothing to fence in our land. Again, the timber being gone, new farming land was used, and the result was that the sheep industry died out. The man who raises sheep today can make money just the same as we did in my boyhood days. In my boyhood days, if a dog killed a sheep, we killed the dog. How is it today? You have a sheep killed by a dog and you go to the auditor and he proves No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 369 your sheep, and then you go the county commissioners, and get your money but you do not bother to go to the owner of the dog that killed your sheep. Now, why not frame some law that will keep that dog on his owner’s premises? I don’t want to see the man punished who keeps a dog on his farm for a good purpose, but on the other hand, up comes this thing that demands a law. Now let us get up a law that will go for these fellows and destroy this dog business that comes up every year. MR. HUTCHISON: Let me ask you one question: How would you punish the man who owned a dog, but who owned no property; how would you punish him? MR. CLARK: Shoot him. MR. HUTCHISON: What, the man? MR. CLARK: Why certainly; I would shoot him, too, if I eouldn’t do anything else, and feed him on bread and water. The CHAIRMAN: Do you know that the dog gives that man more protection than you or I have? MR. CLARK: He certainly does give him that, and a whole lot of privileges. MR. SEXTON: We have talked this thing over year after year, until the subject has become very tiresome, and yet nothing has been done beyond making suggestions. Now, I want to add a little some- thing in regard to sheep, and I tell you there is no domestic animal for which I have more love than | have for the sheep and its progeny, and I have seen the dogs come in and kill off my sheep to the number of twenty-five, and I know it was done by the neighbor’s dogs, but I could not prove it, and had to go and get my pay. Now, is that all, to get our pay? Mr.-Clark says he is satisfied to let them go under , the state law. Let us try to get up a law such as he speaks of, and see what the result will be. Will the opposition come from the farmers? No; it will come from the general breeders of fine dogs, who go to these kennel shows that Mr. Clark speaks of. The only way we can keep sheep is to protect them from the dogs, and if we do not do that, these curs will drive us completely out of business. I tell you, the last carload of fine lambs that I bought at Buffalo and took down to Spring House, I put in a fine pen, well fenced, and yet the dogs got in there, and killed forty lambs in one night, and maimed alot more. I had to send for the butcher to come and take away two wagon-loads of dead lambs. Why, I had on my farm sixty odd head of fine sheep, and they were all killed by the neighbor’s dog, and the dog was chased right home, but we could not catch him, and that man swore that the dog had not been off his premises. There will never be anythimeg done in this matter until the farmers of this Com- monwealth take hold of the matter, and see that it is done. MR. CLARK: What plan have you; in what way shall we pre- ceed? MR. SEXTON: Only to tax these dogs so heavily that they can’t afford to have them round, and then make the fellow who takes the responsibility or the trouble, pay the fine of the irresponsible fellow. DR. CONARD: Now, this matter seems to be discussed entirely from the sheep owners’ point of view. I come from a county where 24—7—1906. 370 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. there are but few sheep, and yet it seems that where there are sheep it is detrimental to keep dogs, and where there are no sheep it is detrimental too. It is in this way: We are working under a law that authorizes the constable to collect one dollar, or two dollars dog tax, and when a sheep is killed, it is proved by the auditor, and the fine paid out of this tax. Now, since they have no sheep, they don’t want to pay any dog tax, and the result is that we have dogs running ~ around anywhere and everywhere and of a much inferior quality than where there are sheep, and they do a proportionate amount of damage. About a month ago I was called over the ’phone, and con- sulted about a dog that had gotten in among the neighbors’ cattle, and was believed to have bitten nearly the whole bunch. He was afterwards killed, and his head sent to the University, for analysis, and he was found to be mad. I was afterwards called to the neigh- borhood where that dog was killed, and found four cases of hydro- phobia. Now, we have the increased danger of carelessness, and you can multiply the danger of hydrophobia by two. So if we have no sheep we have trouble, and if we have sheep we have trouble. Now, there is a way to legislate these dogs into control. I ama friend to the dog, and would not legislate him out of existence, but I would legislate him into control. I think if we put a tax of from three to five dollars on every dog, regardless of sex, unless he or she was emasculated, there would not be so many dogs, but what there were, would be of good breed. MR. NELSON: There is nothing, passing this question, that has been brought up today. We hear a great deal of the sheep side of the question, but in our towns and villages it is customary to have low fences, and in the town where I come from—Clearfield—there is a great deal of talk about dogs doing damage in the yard. At State College I saw the campus covered with dogs, and it is the same way in our town. Now, what about the danger of hydrophobia? How about the girls and boys who have suffered the torture of hydro- phobia from the dogs? I think if you will turn to the report of 1903, you will find on page 212, a resolution that is fair to all parties. Now, Brother Jaekel and I have never found anything that covers all points as this resolution does, and we think that the influence of this Board should be used with the Legislative Committee to get this law passed. I want to be fair to the dog: I keep a Scotch Collie myself, but I keep him in a nice cage, and still, every night, I find my porch covered with dogs, and something should be done. MR. TAYLOR: This gentleman has touched the danger line. The danger is to the sheep, to the horse, to the cattle and to the children. In our village one Sabbath morning, a dog strayed out and went into the town and bit all the dogs; next he attacked the chickens, and then a little boy who tried to take him away. He was killed, and his head sent to Pittsburg, and they directed that all the animals he had bitten should be killed at once, and the boy sent away for treatment. In our little town we have sent away six persons for treatment in the last six months, and for the sake of our loved ones, our fathers, our mothers, our sisters and brothers and children, I think that some action should be taken. I think that you men who are in the Legislature, and who have been in this Board longer than I have, should be able to draft something that will do the work. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. $71 But the trouble in our section of the State is, that we can’t find the owner of the dog. I have been a Justice of the Peace for a number of years, and I have known fifteen cases where they never reported the owner of the dog. We have talked with the people, but we have never found the dog that did the damage. MR. BLYHOLDER: There is another phase to this question, to which this gentleman has just referred, and that is, to find the owner of the dog. I know that in the section of country from which I come the same trouble exists, to find the owner of the dog. The assessor comes along, and sees the dog, and he says “whose dog is that?” and the man says “I don’t know who he belongs to,” and that is the way in every house in the village. Now, I think the assessor should furnish a tag to every owner of a dog, and every dog found without a tag should be killed. The SECRETARY: Should not that be the tax collector? - MR. BLYHOLDER: I also had a-good many sheep killed by a dog, and the dog was never found. Now, I think the assessor should furnish the tag, and the owner be compelled to put it on in the presence of the assessor, and whenever a dog is found that has no tag on, he should be killed at once, right then and there. You know, in our district the tax collector does not come around any more; the tax is brought to him; so I don’t see how he could do it. It seems to me that the assessor is the one who should do it, and he should furnish the tag, and have it put on in his presence, and every dog that is found without a tag should be killed at once. I had a very excellent sheep farm up to three years ago, but I had to sell off the farm and the sheep. The dogs made it simply impossible for me to keep them. MR. BOND: Finding the owner by the dog; what good will that do, if you can’t find the dog? I have a way of finding the dog and the owner; I know the dog, and then I catch him, and find the label. I have two on my hands now. The CHAIRMAN: It séems to me we should not discriminate in favor of the dog. I have a horse, and I must take care of him; I am not supposed to let him roam around all over my neighbor’s property. Why, a dog has more privileges than you or I have. If I go on my neighbor’s property, I make myself liable to an action for trespass. If a man wants to keep a dog, let him keep him in, - and not allow him to run around, biting people and stock. MR. CLARK: I think I can agree with both Brother Bond about identifying the dog, and with Brother Blyholder about identifying the tag. MR. HUTCHISON: There is a gentleman here from York State; they have a local law there in his county, on which I would like to - hear from him. MR. VAN ALSTYNE: I did not want to get into this discussion, although I have been an interested listener to it. We have a local law, that is just going into effect, and it requires that during this 372 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. present month of January every owner of dogs shall apply to the town clerk, and register his dog, with the discription, and pay a fee of two dollars, and the town clerk then issues to him a tag with a number on it corresponding with the one entered into the book, and every dog that is not so recorded during this present month of January has no standing, and the owner who shall fail to register his dog is guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be imprisoned. MR. NELSON: I want to say to Brother Blyholder that the res- olution I have referred to, makes it obligatory upon the constables to report that they have killed all dogs found in their bailiwick without tags. MR. VAN ALSTYNE: I might add that if a man fails to register his dog, he is liable to imprisonment, and his dog is killed. Now, the trouble in regard to having the constable kill the dog, is that the constable is generally a candidate for re-election, and does not care to go around killing his neighbor’s dogs. The CHAIRMAN: Why not let anybody do the killing, instead of forcing the constable to do it? The SECRETARY: I move that a committee of three be appointed with Brother Clark as Chairman, to formulate a bill to be presented to the Legislative Committee for presentation to the Legislature. Motion seconded and agreed to. The CHAIRMAN: I will appoint on that committee Messrs. Clark, Blyholder and Critchfield. The Committee appointed to await on the Governor reports pro- gress. The Governor is very busy, and his whole time will be taken up to-day, but he has signified his willingness to be with us to- morrow morning at 10 o’clock. The CHAIRMAN: We will hear from Mr. Van Alstyne on “Building up a Dairy Herd.” The following is the address: BUILDING UP A DAIRY HERD. By MR. EDWARD VAN ALSTYNE, Denmark, N. Y. I want to talk to you in a very practical way, to, I presume, a company of very practical men. I suppose the aim of this address is that we may obtain a more profitable cow in our dairy. And in what I have to say to-day, as well as to-morrow, I wish you to understand that it is not to the wealthy man, the man with unlimited No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 373 means at his command to purchase the very best that money can buy, that I am talking; he is not the man I have in view at all; he isa very popular factor in society, but the man whose every wish is obtainable is not the man I have in sight. It is the ordinary man, like myself. I say this because I think it will be best for us to clearly understand one another I think that we to-day want a beiter dairy cow than ever before. I say that, because I fear in many instances the farmer is keeping his cows with but little profit. What is the profit on the dairy cow? Is it that she simply pays for her keep, and makes a minimum of profit? That is not going to pay off the mortgage, and clothe the children, on the farm. The first thing we expect of a cow is that she will pay interest on the money invested in her. If we take three or five hundred dollars to the savings bank, we get three and one- half per cent. interest, without the “trouble of working for it. If we put it out at interest, we get from five to six per cent.; as you increase the risk, you increase the interest. When we invest it ina cow, three and one-half per cent. is not enough, nor five, nor six per cent., because we are not sure that we can get it back when we want it. I find that in a herd of twenty-five cows it is necessary to replace at least five each year to keep the herd in good condition. Some of them may go barren, and some of them may lose part of the udder, one may die... So I figure that on the money invested in the Dairy Cow, I should have at least ten per cent. to equal the interest on the same amount of money invested elsewhere. So if we pay fifty dollars for the cow we should have at least five dollars profit on her. The next practical thought is her feed. As I said before, she should pay for her keep before we begin to make any profit on her. And the labor; what does it cost to milk her three hundred days in the year, Sundays and holidays included? At least ten dollars more on that. So I figure that I must have at least ten dollars over and above the cost of her feed, and the interest on the money invested in her, before I begin to make money on her. Now, we have to have a better dairy cow, and I am very sure that it is not of any particular breed. A man starts out thinking he is going to make money right out of this particular breed, or that one. Now, let me say that each particular breed have their use for special purposes. I want to make myself clear on this point, because you may infer from what I say later on, that I am not a believer in pure bred cattle for the ordinary man. Yet Iamamost firm believer. I believe firmly that all the best things we have in our dairy herd to- day are the result of careful breeding. We will take the superb Holstein, which for two thousand years has been bred in Freisland, Holland, where she is given a large amount of rather bulky feed, with a view to producing large quantities of milk, without reference to quality, and in which purpose they have succeeded. The Holstein will produce a quart of milk—regardless of its interest—on the feed given her cheaper than any other cow. Then we will take the Jerseys and Guernseys, bred on the rocky Channel Islands, milk high in fat and other solids and yellow, more scant in quantity than ig that of the Holstein. They have been bred not so much to pro- duce a large quantity of milk, as to produce one high in fat with a large globule, easily churned when made into butter. They have 374 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. succeeded in that as the Holstein breeders have succeeded in their object. The Channel Island cattle produce a pound of butter cheaper than any other cows on earth. Not only because she pro- duces butter cheaper, but because she produces a better butter. That is where many have.fallen down. At the Buffalo Exposition it cost for food, for the Holstein cattle to make a pound of butter, about twelve cents. The Channel Island cattle, butter for food costs about nine cents. You can’t improve on the cream or butter of the Channel Island cattle, because they are bred for that purpose. I will illustrate this: Those of you who were at the Exposition will remember that we had a smail dairy-room which was often at a temperature of seventy degrees. On those hot days we took the cream from any other breed than the ChannelIsland cattle, and churned it at 60 degrees, we had grease pure and simple. We had to take such cream and reduce it to a temperature of forty, and then churn it for two hours, before we had butter ,and then we often had to set the butter away for twenty-four hours before it was hard enough to print. We could take the cream from the Channel Island cattle, churn it at between fifty and sixty, take it out of the churn and print it and set it up on the form no matter what the tempera- ture. Therefore I say that the Holstein is not the cow for the man who wants to make butter for market. The man who wants rich milk or who wants to make butter is a very foolish man if he at- tempts to make it from any other breed than those bred for that pur- pose. But there is a cow between the two, the Ayrshire, from Ayr, . in Scotland, where they have not so much feed to give her, and she has had to hustle for her living. She gives a large supply of milk, with about four per cent. fat. For the man who wants a good milk, and fair quality, where the feed supply is not abundant the Ayrshire is the cow. Again the man who wants to make beef is very foolish if he attempts to make it from any other breed than those bred for that purpose, such as the Shorthorns or Hereford. You see I am not a believer in the dual purpose cow. You say you want a cow on which you can make a little on the milk, a little on the butter, and a little on the carcass, but you can’t do that and not lose in every re- spect. I will take for illustration, the Holstein, the extreme dairy breed, and the Hereford or Shorthorn, the extreme beef breed. We will put both on the market, both equally well fed, and weighing the same, and the Hereford will bring from one-half cent to one cent per pound more than the other. Why? Because the Holstein is devel- oped in the lower portion of the bedy and the other up where the cuts are worth the least, in the back and loins. Again, the man who attempts to use the be@f cow in the dairy, is as foolish as the man who would hunt birds with a bull doz. Get cows of the type that will fit your needs. “I thought,” you will say, “you said you were going to talk to the average farmer, and now you tell us to go to an importer and buy our stock.” Yes, if you have plenty of money which most of us haven’t. We have come to the point where most of us realize that we must have a better dairy cow, and that a cow that has been bred for a particular purpose. What shall we do? We go to a man who has good pure bred cows for sale, and select some that we think will answer our purpose and find that they will cost from one hundred Nos 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 375 and fifty to two hundred and fifty do'lars each, and we can’t afford to take them. The animals are worth it, but we simply can’t afford to pay the price. What then? We have our heads set on pure bred stock, and we go down the line until we find something that fits our pocketbook, and we say “these are pure bred?” And they answer “Oh, yes.” “They are registered?” “QO, yes.” And we buy them, and take home the man’s culls. He wouldn’t have sold them at that price if they had not been culls. I repeat that these animals have been bred for the particular pur- pose for which we want them. When we have made up our minds we want a large supply of milk, and have plenty of feed, then we take the Holstein; if butter, then we take the Channel Island cattle; if better milk, and hilly pastures, then we take the Ayrshire, and if meat, then we take the Hereford or Shorthorn. A good cow is cheaper at sixty dollars than a poor one is at ten. I am going to describe the requirements of a good cow a little later. With the best grade of the particular type desired, we will get a bull of the breed we want. Let me emphasize the importance of a good bull. The importance of pure breed. I don’t think we emphasize that as we should. When we consider the breeding of animals, the strain of the sire should be very carefully noted. Why, gentlemen, what is a pure bred animal? It is simply one that has been bred in a certain line so long that the type has become fixed. There is always a tendency to go back to the characteristics of the ancestors, and the better these characteristics and the longer they have been bred, the nearer we get to the animals that we want, and the more certain we are of producing the tendencies of that line. The more we breed, indiscriminately, the more likely we are to go back to the original tendencies. To illustrate this, let us take the human family, and go right back to the Jew. Since the days whea Abraham went out from Ur of Chaldea and went whither he knew not, down through the centuries, there has been the Jew, and to-day when for more than two thousand years he hag had no country, he is as separate and distinct as he was four thousand years ago in Palestine. You can pick him out to-day by his facial characteristics, and by the same characteristics which Jacob exhibited when he entered into that cattle deal with Laban, and in Joseph, when he got up that corner in grain. Scan their names; you will find them foremost in finance, in music, in trade and in politics. They are masters in whatever they undertake. Why does the Jew succeed in spite of the persecu- tion he has endured? Because he is smarter than the other fellow. It is just this: The marriage of Jew with Jew, the breeding of the racial characteristics, until we know to a certainty when we see a Jewish family, that the child is going to be the same Jew that his parents are. And this is the way our type of domestic animals is fixed. You will buy a sire of the best breed. I believe it is more necessary for me to have a good sire in my herd of grades, with his breeding capacity proven, than it is for my neighbor, who is breeding pure breeds entirely. He has a pure blood in his cows. You get a grade sire, the descendant of pure breed on one side, and of anything on the other; you breed him with a good cow, and you say he will re- produce the traits of his pure breeding; how do you know this? 376 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. There is always a tendency to go back to the traits of the ancestors, but how do you know he will not reproduce the bad traits, instead of the good ones? He is just as likely to do so. Then comes the cross-bred, the result of breeding two pure breeds together. For instance, I will take a Holstein that gives plenty of milk, but it is not rich, and I will breed him with a Jersey who has plenty of richness, but not so much milk, and then I will have the excellencies of the two? What is the result? I get the quantity of the Jersey and the richness of the Holstein. It is the old story of avatism, the going back to the original tendencies of the ances- tors. Darwin in his “Origin of Species’ claimed this, and made the statement that all breeds of pigeons could be traced back to the old Blue Mediterranean pigeon. ‘To prove it, he crossed the Pouter and the Fan Tail and what did he get but the blue tail feathers of the Mediterranean pigeon. We see the same thing in our cross breeding. When we bring together two pure breeds, we increase, for some unknown reason, the tendency to get the bad qualities of both lines. I can bring that right dewn to you. It is not the simon pure negro that causes the most trouble; it is the mulatto, who developes the worst traits of both his black and white ancestors. We have the same thing in the Indian. Up in New York, we have not many Indians, but we still have a few, who are a conglomeration of the old Six Nations mixed with whites, combiaing the evil traits of the white blood in them, with the same traits of their red blood. They are the laziest and most shiftless beings on earth. They won’t work if they can beg or steal. I could not heip, at the Exposition, but compare them with the real simon-pure Indian of the plains. You know they had an Indian village there. These were dignified, a fine type of pure breeding, the other, the evil product of the two races. Perhaps I am spending too much time on this, but I realize the importance of it. We had first the grade sire, then the cross-bred sire, but what we want is a pure sire. So we get one, and use him with the herd, and if his calves are what they should be, and he proves to be a good animal, we will keep him just so long as he is serviceable. There is more deterioration to be laid to the yearling than from most any other cause. We want the strength and the stamina of fully matured ancestors. I prefer to have a bull eight or nine years old; I never know just what he is going to do until he is four years old. I sacrificed one of the best bulls that I ever had when he was three years old, and never knew it until bis daughters came to milk. Sol have learned to keep my sires just as long as they are serviceable. With grades, I would use a bull with his daughters. You will say that is incestuous breeding. That is true, but when we bring these two lines of blood together we get three-quarters of the line-blood that we want. If there are no weakness in either sire or dam there will be little to fear from such a course. And when we buy again, buy a bull that is bred along that line. That is where many a far- mer makes a fearful mistake; be would like a little more size, so he takes another breed to get it; he would like a little more butter so he goes to the Jerseys to get it, and perhaps he would like a little more beef, so he goes to the Hereford to get it. He is like the woodchoppers; they were Canucks, their work was cold, and No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 377 they generally wanted a little something to warm them up. On one occasion they tried to tell the landlord at the tavern what they wanted; they didn’t know the name, so the Canuck said: “You take a little whiskey to make it strong, and a little water to make it weak; a little lemon to make it sour, and a little sugar to make it sweet.” “Oh,” said the landlord, “that isa flip.” And so it is with our farmer. You get a little Holstein for the milk, and a little Jersey for the cream, and a little Shorthorn for the beef, and you have a “flip” every time, and if i want to see poor cattle, I will go to the place where they have followed this course. When I went into breeding, I raised all my heifer calves. But there was something wrong; I didn’t get results; so I said ‘I will have to be more careful,’ and [ selected them only from the best cows, and I got nearer what I wanted, but I still drew a good many blanks, until I began to examine the calves themselves. Now it is a fact that a good many heifer calves fail to be as good as their dams. Do you ever think how much we ask of the dairy cow? We ask her in twelve months to support herself, to reproduce herself, and give us an amount of milk often equal to the weight of her body. Now, I have begun to examine my calves, and I find a calf that is weak, and aenemic, I don’t iry to raise it, and this you can tell by looking at the calf. Open its mouth, aad look at its teeth. and if you find only four of the milk teeth, that calf is not worth raising. Why? That mother had too much of a strain on her, and she was not able to put strength and stamina into the calf she was raising. I have raised some of these calves, and they have always been a disappointment. Then I examined the naval, and the teats; one of the tests of a good udder is to have the teats placed right. This fall I was a judge at a fair up in my state, and a man brought in a heifer. She was a fine Jersey, and I thought “that is a prize winner, sure,” until I examined her udder and found two of the teats joined together. I asked him why he raised her, and he sain he had never looked at that; he had never seen it. Now, when a calf passes muster, then we keep it, but do not for- get that their value as cows will depend largely upon their treat. ment for the first two years. They must be well cared for. After the first few months it is better to turn them out and let them work a little for their feed; it helps to develop them. They should have a large stomach, for it shows great storage capacity, even if it makes them appear pot-bellied. They must have a place where to carry the feed. I was at Moorestown, New Jersey, last winter, to see a herd of cattle that were large producers. I saw nothing abnormal about the cows except that they all seemed unusually large, and that many of the two-year old heifers were larger than those two and a half and three years old as usually seen of that breed. I! could not understand it until they told me that they fed those calves on milk until they were a year old. Now, then, we have selected our stock, and are breeding along that line year after year. We have found what we want, and we will go on breeding along that Jine, and in ten or twelve years we will have a herd that is nearly equal to pure bred. They are really pure bred, only they can’t be registered. When we are adding to our stock we will get in one or two good pure bred females, and at 25 378 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. the end of ten or twelve years we will have a herd of fine, pure bred stock, and when we come to sell them we can get better prices for them. Now, all good cows have certain points. What are they? To show them I have had the picture made. It is a very fair picture of a good grade cow I had. First, let us see the characteristics of the cow of way back. Now, the cow that Adam had afier he left horti- culture, wags not much of a cow. What was she? Well, she was fitted for her work. She had to live out in the jungle, and fight for her existence with the wild beasts, and it was a case of the survival of the fittest. She had to fight her way through the heavy brush and overhanging trees. Let us see her characteristics: A small barrel, for she had only what food she found closed ribbed for protection; a small udder; a short neck and heavy horns, character- istic of the fighter. We should call that a very sorry cow, but she was probably the best suited to the times and her environment. Now, as to the points of the good cow: We can not fail to be im- pressed by her girth through here (the body), by the large nostril, and bright eye. The animal that has a prominent and snappy bright eye is the one that is likely to have a good constitution. The \arge wide nostril means a good pair of lungs; and a heart that is doing its duty. Then we have the thin head, with light horn, and prominent, pointed shoulder; the sharp, not flat back, widespread at the haunch, to insure easy delivery of the calf; ribs well set; high pelvic arch, long tail. What has the tail to do with it? Only this, that the tail is the extension of the spinal column, and a leng tail indicates strong nerve force. We can just as well breed good udders and easy milkers ag the contrary. I have to-day descendants of the fourth generation of easy milking cow, and they have all more or less of her tendencies. Then I have two or three heifers descended from a cow that was not an easy milker, and I don’t raise any more of them. Life is too short. Then comes a large, crooked, milk vein. Some people are rather inclined to ridicule that, but I have found it a good test. It shows the flow of blood from the udder to the heart. Now, when there is not much milk, thefe is not much blood there. What I lay most stress on is the hole in the end of it; if the hole is large, it indicates that it is built to carry plenty of blood. We will probably find this larger on the left side than on the right. These are always things that are present in a good dairy cow, and they are characteristic of a good dairy cow. We find the same characteristics in the sire. I want the head and the neck to be thin. I want him to have the same arched spine, and the same contour here as in the cow, and I want to find four good, rudimentary teats in the sire, which are well placed. I lay great stress on their being placed, because the sire reproduces himself, and you will find four times out of five that the teats of the heifer are much the same as the rudimentary teats of the sire. Then I like to see a good milk vein. Then I take the loose skin at the flank and stretch it; if it stretches out long and flexible, it is a good indication of the udder on his heifers. I was judging at a fair up in Washington County, my state, and there was a farmer there who was in the habit of carrying off the prizes each year, and I gave him a premium for one or two of his cows, but none for his No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 379 heifers, and none for his sire. He came to me and said, “I, wish you would tell me why you turned down my bull and my heifers;” well, we brought out the bull; I could not find in him any of the rudimen- tary lines. He said he never knew of the existence of anything like that. Then we looked at the heifers; not one of them had an udder bigger than a sheep, and he said he was disappointed in them, but didn’t know the reason. He didn’t take offense at being turned down, but declared his intention of trying to breed along the lines T had pointed out to him. In this case, the sire had simply repro- duced himself. I want a good bull with good ancestry; the best I-can get; but when we get to a place where we must choose between a bull with a good registered ancestry of performances and is not himself a good specimen, and one who is a good individual, I would rather have the bull that has the record of performance every time than the one with no known ancestry, but a good individual. Keep a record of his milk strain and breed from that. Give me a bull with an ancestry of producers, and he will produce himself in his descend- ants. Given these things, [ know we can develop a herd of better quality, and better producers than we can in any other way. The CHAIRMAN: We might devote a few minutes to the dis cussion of Mr. Van Alstyne’s address. MR. RODGERS: What effect would it have on the cream where afarmer keeps one-half Holstein and one-half Jersey cows. Would it churn together properly? MR. VAN ALSTYNE: Yes; there would not be so much loss if separated by mathine. Of course we know that cream passes in the separator as rapidly as the gravity aliows, and the butter glo- bules would not be mixed with those of the Jersey, and it would not turn out quite so rich. ‘And there is another point: what makes a good ration for the Holstein will not make a good ration for the Jersey. So I would rather have them one grade. Now, a man may have to keep a Holstein and a Jersey if he sells the milk, to make it a little rich. I have heard people say that the butter of the Hol- stein was of excellent flavor, while that of the Jersey was not so ideally flavored. That is not so at all. It is due to the feed, and to the manipulation of the cream. MR. McCREARY: A yellow skin on the animal, would that count in its favor? 3 MR. VAN ALSTYNE: A yellow skin on a Holstein as well as on any other animal will be a good indication that there is some butter fat there, but it is not always a sure indication. Now, for instance, the Guernsey cream is more highly colored than that of the Jersey, yet the Jersey has the richer skin, but has not, consequently, the richer cream. A better way, I have found, is to turn back the ears, and if they are oily, and to look again at the shoulder, and again at 380 - ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. the end of the tail, and if you tind there an oily substance, the milk will be pretty sure to be rich in butter fat. The CHAIRMAN: Do you consider the Ayrshire a good dairy cow? MR VAN ALSTYNE: Yes, I do. When a man wants a cream of 44 per cent., or a little better, present, I believe that the Ayrshire is better for that purpose than any other, but it seems to me that she is not as highly appreciated as she should be. I suppose the reason for that is that she has been a good cow, and they have been satisfied to keep her, and not attempt to put her to the front. MR. HERR: Is it not one objection to the Ayrshire that her teats are very slender, making her hard to milk? MR. VAN ALSTYNE: Well, yes; the Ayrshire in Scotland is milked by the women, and time is not valued, so that the teats are very slender, but in the last ten years her teats have been very much improved. MR. SNAVELY: Is not the Ayrshire coming to the front during the last few years? MR. VAN ALSTYNE: I want to say this; and I dont want any one to think I am opposed to the Holstein, because I think the Hol- stein is the best cow in the country to-day, but I have seen a good many indications in our country, where they make cheese to a large extent, that would seem to show that the Holstein is taking second place. I should be sorry to see it, but just as sure as the sun rises to-morrow morning, in a few years you will see the ‘Ayrshire dis- placing the Holstein in our country. MR. CHUBBUCK: How about the Brown Swiss? She is a good cow, and some of my friends here are perhaps aware of it; she gives as much milk as the Holstein, and nearly as rich as the Jersey, and has a heavy carcass. I don’t believe in going abroad, when you have your choice of the best at home. MR. HERR: I should like to say that if there are any other creden- tials, I should be glad to have you hand them in now. The SECRETARY: Prof. Van Norman wants to make an an- nouncement. PROF. VAN NORMAN: I merely wish to say that we have about completed arrangements for the demonstration of our milking machine. The cows are here, and we will have a demonstration at eight this evening, at ten to-morrow morning, and at four to-morrow afternoon. MR. FENSTERMAKER: Will it not be possible to get off some more of the reports? There will be a fearful amount of ground to cover to-morrow. MR. SEXTON: I move that we adjourn. Properly seconded, and was agreed to. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 381 Tuesday, January 22, 7:30 P. M. The evening session opened with Vice President 8S. M. McHenry in the Chair. The CHAIRMAN: Is Prof. Cochran of West Chester here? The SECRETARY: I have not seen him to-day, and don’t think he is here. The CHAIRMAN: Next in order is the report of Dr. Groff; is he here? The SECRETARY: Dr. Groff is not here, but his report is, and can be read, or received and placed on file, as desired. It was moved and seconded that the report be received and placed on file, for publication with the other reports. Agreed to. The report is as follows: REPORT OF HYGIENIST. By Dr. GEO. G. GROFF, Lewisburg, Pa. Tuberculosis, Typhoid Fever, and Cancer are the three germ diseases which now claim the greatest number of victims in our State. Beyond a doubt, all are communicable from person to per son. Tuberculosis is common to man and many of the lower animals, though it is doubtful if it is often communicated to man from these ‘lower animals. The reason of this seems to be, that the tempera- ture of the common domestic animals is higher than in man, so that when the germs find their way into the human body, they fail to live and multiply in the lower temperature of the human body. The cow, sheep, hog and poultry are all subject to Tuberculosis, and any animal known to be affected, should not be used for human food, and in the case of affected cows, they should not be kept in dairies, but should be removed and killed. Whenever an inmate of a family is stricken with this dread dis- ease, or whenever any signs of the disease appear, an outdoor life should at once be entered upon. Such person should live out of doors day and night. He should get all the fresh air, milk and eggs possible in the twenty-four hours. The germs of the disease are eating his body up. The air, milk and eggs are prescribed in order, if possible, that they may build up the body, more rapidly than the germs destroy it, and sometimes the treatment succeeds. There is almost no use to use medicine for the disease. Care should be taken that no one else in the family takes the disease from the sick person. He should never spit upon the ground or upon a floor, but into a 382 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. paper napkin which should be burned. The ordinary handkerchief is dangerous is used to receive the sputum. One sick with tubercu- losis should not be employed in the dairy, for he may infect the milk with his hands, or the straw of the stable with his sputum, which when dried, may get into the milk, where the germs live and multiply. The tubercular patient should have his own dishes, which should be washed separately from the other dishes of the family, and arti- cles of food which he does not eat, should be burned, or buried deeply in the ground. After a death from tuberculosis, the room and all that belonged to the patient should be most thoroughly disinfected. The sick-room should be exposed to the air and sunshine so long as possible before it is again used. . People do not inherit tuberculosis. They may inherit constitu- tions which are susceptible to that disease, and so we often see several cases in the same family; not because the disease has been inherited, but because it has been communicated by the first case to the others. Typhoid fever is also a germ disease, communicated most com- monly through food and drink. These become contaminated and infected by more or less carelessness. Thus, faecal matter is too often allowed to enter water which may be used for domestic pur- poses. Sewers commonly discharge into streams which lower dowt | are used for drinking purposes. Privies are generally too near wells, and often on higher ground, so that it is entirely possible for drainage on the surface, or underground, to exist directly in the well or spring. If the discharges from a typhoid fever patient enter drinking water, it is almost certain that some of those who use the water will contract the disease. If such water is introduced into milk, the disease may be in that way spread, for these germ flourish in that fluid. A person suffering from a mild form of typhoid fever, may, in milking or in cleansing the utensils in a dairy, infect the milk, and epidemics have originated in this manner. Nurses, in handling the sick, have their hands infected and unless they are very careful, they will infect food and drink. The person who nurses one sick with typhoid fever, should not, if possible, cook for the family. Every time she handles the patient, she should © most carefully wash her hands. One sleeping with a patient with typhiod fever, may readily contract it. So, also, if there is careless- ness in a family with the discharge from a sick person, the germs may get into the house, dry up, spread about, and many persons come down with the fever. With the utmost care, the disease cam be confined to the person who first takes it. There is no need to quarantine a house with typhoid fever, and there is no need to keep the children home from school. It is well to tie the pump handle, when, in the country, a funeral occurs from typhoid fever. The water is dangerous to use. It should all be pumped out, a pound of copper sulphate thrown into the well, left there for a day, and the well again pumped dry. Cancer has become one of our most prevalent diseases, as well as one of the most fatal. There is no idea that it is inherited, but it distinctly follows in certain families, for the same reason that tuber- culosis does. There is no proof at all existing, that any foods, ani- mal or vegetable, in any way cause cancer. Cancer has been ob No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 383 served in the eye and salivary glands of the cow, and in trout in pro- pagating tanks, and in rats and mice, in the latter in the mammary glands. From studies recently made in the State Cancer Hospital, Buffalc, New York, it would seem that beyond a doubt, rat and mice cages may become infected with cancer, healthy animals placed in such cages cantracting the cancer. This would lead to the inference that rooms in which cancerous patients hve may become infected, and so the disease may be spread. It would be well in all these cases to thoroughly disinfect all articles used by such patients, and on their death to most thoroughly cleanse and fumigate the room. A point brought out in the studies of cancer in rats, was, that one cage remained infected for a period of three years, no rats having been in it in all that time. No germ has yet been discovered for cancer, but it is generally thought to be caused by a minute animal germ, It is now generally recognized that the Grippe and ordinary “colds” are “catching.” In the writer’s family it has been noted now fora good many years, that if one member of the family has a “cold,” one after another “catch” it. Sometimes, however, one or two members of the household escape. At the State Sanitaria for Tuber- culosis, it has been observed that colds become epidemic. The same is frequently seen in schools. By exercising care with the sputa, these diseases may be restricted, possibly to those who first contract them. _ The CHAIRMAN: Prof. Surface is next on the program. We shall now have the pleasure of listening to him. PROF. SURFACE: Mr. Chairman, by a mistake I made this even- ing, I brought the report of the Ornithologist to-night. I have pre- pared some specimens of insects which I wish to use in the report on Entomology, and which I have not with me. If, therefore, there is no objection, I will give the report of the Ornithologist at this time instead of the report of the Entomologist. The CHAIRMAN: If there is no objection on the part of the members present, we will listen to the report on Ornithology to- night, instead of the report on Entomology. No objection being made, Prof. Surface read his report as follows: REPORT OF THE ORNITHOLOGIST. By PROF. H. A. SURFACE, Harrisburg, Pa. The past year has been one of unusual interest in certain features of bird life in Pennsylvania. In the beginning of the season for migration the Blue Bird came north early, and after their arrival snow came and remained on the ground until thousands of Blue Birds were starved, and the dead or dying remains of many were 384 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doé. found. This materially decreased the number of Blue Birds nesting in this State during the summer. Several reports sent us from Lancaster, Dauphin and other counties, concerning Black Birds picking large holes in growing English Walnuts before they were half grown. This did not appear to be for food, and the suggestion has been made by Mr. Gabriel Hiester, President of the State Horti- cultural Association, that it may have been to use the bitter juice of the English Walnut as an insecticide for their parasites, as he noticed them picking the walnuts and then preening their feathers. Unusual complaints have been made against the English Sparrows, especially for their damage to peas growing in gardens, which they pulled as soon as they appeared above ground, and of which they also ate into the pod before the young peas were ready to pick. Much complaint has also reached us of English Sparrows eating the buds of fruit trees, and if legislation could abate this nuisance, we should be heartily in favor of it. The statements have come to us that the Wild Pigeon has been several times in the northern and mountainous parts of this State, and we have a letter recently received upon this subject, stating that a wild pigeon was seen nesting on a stump last summer. We wish to speak in some detail of the stomach contents of va- rious species of birds that have been sent to the office of the Eco- nomic Zoologist during the past year. Among these are the fol- lowing: The Horned Grebe.—We have received and examined the contents of six specimens of Horned Grebe and have found sand and vegeta- ble matter in practically all. In three there were fragments of Black Beetles, probably the so-called Whirligig Beetles, which live on the surface of the waiter. The Blue-winged Teal.—A Blue-winged Teal was found to have fed upon aquatic snails or mollusks, seeds of Polygonum or smart-weed, and other weed seeds. The ‘American Black Scoter—An American Black Scoter was found to contain a mussel-shell 5x2.5 centimeters, another small bivalve, and fragments of other bivalves, showing that it is decidedly a mollusk-eater. The Coot or Mud-hen.—Several specimens of Coots were examined and all were found to contain white sand and vegetable fibres, while one had eaten a large number of smail snails. However, the evi- dences are that it is to a great extent a feeder on aquatic vegetation. The Bittern or Indian Hen.-—The stomachs of two Bitterns were examined, one of which was empty, but the other contained one of the night-flying moths, the remains of a cricket, and the spines and fleshy tissue of a caterpillar, probably the destructive Woolly Bear larva. The stomach of this Bittern was lined with the bristles of such insect larva. This is a new and interesting point for the Bit- tern. It also contained the seed of Spanish Needles. Thus we see this aquatic bird, which is too often shot by gunners, is justly pro- tected by the law. The American Goshawk.—In the fall or early winter there was an unusual southward flight of the American Goshawk, or Blue Hen Hawk, which nests mostly northward and comes into this State only in the winter. Of four Goshawks examined we found the No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 385 stomachs of two contained feathers, probably of small birds, and one with chicken feathers. in fact, the last-named was caught by a steel trap set upon a chicken which it killed. This is one of the serious enemies of rabbits, ruffed grouse, quail, and domestic poul- try, and is not protected by law in this State. The Red-tailed Hawk.—There has been much discussion about the protection of the Red-tailed Hawk, as it is one of the birds that can not be killed legally at any time -n Pennsylvania. This law is commonly violated, but we have seen ~nough to justify its preserva- tion. For example, in one Red-tailed Hawk we found two red- legged grasshoppers, the head of a chipmunk, and two specimens of field mice. Another contained the upper and lower jaws of a field mouse, showing plainly that it was beneficial in its feeding habits. The Red-shouldered Hawk.—tThis is another bird justly protected by law at all times. in the stomach of one was found a mass of hairs of a mouse, and in another were found two specimens of a short- tailed meadow mouse, or mole, and also a red-legged grasshopper. As this is the mouse that destroys trees by gnawing their bark to such an extent during the winter, and as the red-legged grasshop- pers are the most destructive Pennsylvania insects of their Order, we can understand why the Red-shouldered Hawk should be pre- served. Cooper’s Hawk.—In the stomach of one individual of this species we found the remains of a chipmunk and part of a small bird. In another was found a few small white feathers, showing that it had eaten a small bird, in another flesh and feathers of a chicken, show- ing that it was destroying poultry. This record does not entitle it to protection. The Great-horned Owl.—In one Great-horned Owl we found feath- ers and bones of a chicken, and in fact, this bird was trapped when trying to get poultry. In another were the feathers of a small bird, giving evidence of the justice of the law permitting the Great-horned Owl to be killed at any time. However, we emphasize the point that there are at least eight species of Owls found in this State, and this is the only one than can legally be killed or captured. The Screech-Ow!.—In one Screech-Owl was found a spider and an insect, and in others were found mice and English Sparrows. This bird, and in fact, all the other owls but the Great-horned, should always be protected. The Long-eared Owl.—One specimen was examined, and in its stomach was found the remains of three short-tailed meadow mice or moles. The Barred Owl.—In a Barred Owl was found the Star-nosed Mole (Condylura cristata). Ruffed Grouse.—A Ruffed Grouse had eaten a great abundance of sumac seed, also the red berries and seeds of the karonia, bitter- sweet, and wild smilax. Another was filled with the more common food of catkins or flower buds of the birch tree and hazel bush. The Downy Woodpecker.—A Downy Woodpecker was found tc have eaten two grubs, similar to the flat-headed borer of trees. A Night-Hawk—A Night-Hawk, No. 7619, was found to have sustained its good reputation as an insect eater by regaling itself on the following material: a Carabid or ground beetle, three clover- leaf beetles, (Phytonomts Punctatus:. four Pentatomids or stink- 25—7—1906, 386 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. bugs, several kinds of ants, a grasshopper and other insects, which could not be determined by examination, because fragmentary. The Common Crow.—Much interest should be taken in the careful study of the food of the crow. Since it is unprotected by law at any time in this State, persons can kill specimens and send them to us. We have requested many times specimens of crows and jays, killed at different times of the year, and from different portions of the State. We should like to have them in order to enable us to make complete studies of their food and thus prepare and publish a Bulletin upon this special topic. We have found the crow feeding upon snails, beetles, clover-leaf beetles, red-legged grasshoppers, and other grasshoppers, Pentato- mids, or stink bugs, insect chrysalids, flesh, (probably taken as a- scavenger around a slaughter house or where butchering was done), and pumpkin and corn seeds. On the whole, those that were examined were fully as beneficial as injurious, if not more so. i The Blue Jay.—Blue Jays were found to have fed upon the remains of beetles, snails, chestnuts, berry seeds, leaf-eating caterpillars, and probably corn. This shows the possibility of, good from the feeding habits of the Blue Jay; we also admit that it indicates the chance of injurious work at certain times of the year if they should become very numerous in grain fields. Perhaps the worst that can be said about the Blue Jay is concerning its destructiveness of birds’ eggs and young birds; yet it must be admitted that it eats many insects and young snails. The Logger-head Shrike.—This is a southern bird, remaining with us during the summer time, and nesting in thorn bushes or bushes with spines, where it finds it convenient to pin insects, small birds, frogs, mice and other creatures, which it stores for future use. The particular specimen which was sent to us, No. 8486, was found to have eaten a spider, grasshoppers and caterpillars. This shows that the Shrike is a bird worthy of protection, and in our opinion, should be preserved at all times, and is justly protected by law in this State. The Chickadee.—(Parus atricapillus.)—The Chickaee is one of our smallest and at the same time, most valuable birds. It remains in some portions of this State, particularly the northern part, all the year, and is found in this (central and southern) part of the State all winter. It feeds to a great extent on the eggs of plant lice, and other insects, and upon small chrysalids. This specimen examined had eaten a moth pupa about the size of the pupa of the Codling Moth, which is destroyed by these little birds. The Tufted Titmouse.—This is a near relative of the Chickadee, belonging to the same family, and partaking of similar food. Speci- men No. 8336, was found to have eaten twenty eggs of a bug belong- ing to the bed bug family (yet one of the plant-infesting species), and also a few seeds. In conclusion, let us urge a closer study of the habits of birds, with a view of detecting and protecting those which are beneficial and destroying none until they are known to be harmful. Let us especi- ally endeavor to preserve the Woodpeckers and Nut-hatches, also Chickadees and Titmouse by putting up old posts or logs in which they can nest; and other birds, such as Blue Hen, Wrens and Mar- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 387 tins, by preparing nesting boxes or other favorite sites for them. Let us remember that the stray cat is a greater enemy to the birds, and thus also to the agriculturist, ihan the stray dog, and thus kill the superfluous cat by drowning or otherwise, rather than turn them loose in some lonely spot to kill birds or starve. Let us realize that the greatest work to-day before the Naturalist who is working for the husbandman, is to learn what are the enemies of the obnoxious insects, which infest plants, and to teach how to preserve, or propagate these and thus insure living checks to the hordes of devastating creatures. The CHAIRMAN: What shall be done with this report? It was moved and duly seconded, and agreed to that this report be received and placed on file. MR. HERR: The Committee on Credentials has a supplementary report to make: We have examined the Credentials of W. H. Stout. and J. L. Patterson, and recommend that they be admitted to mem- bership in the Society. It was moved and seconded that the above-named gentlemen be received as members. Agreed to. The CHAIRMAN: Dr. Conard, whose report comes next on the program, is not with us just at this moment, so we will take up the discussion of the report we have just heard. By the time we are through, Dr. Conard will no doubt be in the room. Has any one any questions to ask Prof. Surface? MR. FENSTERMAKER: If we put out feed for the birds that are beneficial, will we not encourage the English Sparrow? Will not he get the food so placed? PROF. SURFACE: The English Sparrow is a grain-eating bird, and not much of a flesh-eater. The Chickadee and Titmouse are rather meat-eating birds, and it would be wise to put out a little meat or tallow for their use. If seeds were taken out they would attract the sparrow, but the tallow is not much of a temptation for him. MR. BLYHOLDER: I wouid like to ask Prof. Surface what he would recommend to exterminate the English Sparrow? PROF. SURFACE: If I could recommend anything to do that, I would gladly do it; Iam of the opinion, however, that he is one of the evils that must be endured because it can’t be cured. I have heard, though, that the best thing that has yet been found, is tu give them seed which has been poisoned by strychnine. The poison should be disguised by mixing it with sugar. It is an experiment, however, that I have not tried, but I will probably have a report to give you next year on this matter. I would say, though, that great care must be taken with regard to poultry, so that they do not get the seed. I do not believe the bounty law will ever bea success. It has been tried at various places, and a bounty of three, four, and even five cents, paid for every bird that was killed; but by killing 388 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. one-half or three-quarters of them, it simply leaves more room for the others to thrive. Consequent'y, it does very little good, and only for one year, as they will increase the next. DR. FUNK: Can’t they be baited and trapped? PROF. SURFACE: They are a very shy bird. It has been tried to trap them, and they succeeded once or twice, but afterwards the birds would stay away from there for weeks or for months. I think that one of the things we can do is to modify our architecture some- what, so that they will not have any place to nest. Try doing away with the overhanging cornice, so as to make their nests accessible, when they can be reached and destroyed with the eggs before they are hatched. The CHAIRMAN: If there is nothing further on this subject, we will take up the question of poultry, by Dr. Conard. Dr. Conard then read his report as follows: REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON POULTRY. By DR. M. E. CONARD, Chairman. Not being a practical Poultryman, I feel a little out of place on this Committee; but will promise you that my paper shall possess one commendable feature—brevity. In times past, the growing of poultry and the production of eggs has been a branch of agriculture that has too generally been classed as of minor importance and thought too small to demand the atten- tion of the chief executive of the farm. But are we sure that it did not return a better percentage of profit than some of the so-called more important branches or departments of the farming opera- tions? Let us see what we receive for feed consumed by a flock of hens, as compared with an equal value fed for milk, beef, or pork. Is it not a fair comparison to consider that the grain ration of a good working dairy cow will equal in value the ration of forty hens? Then, allowing the cow to give six quarts of milk per day, sold at three and one-half cents per quart net, she will return $81.65 per year, while the forty hens receiving the same value of food and care produce one and one-half dozen eggs daily—sold at twenty cents per dozen—aggregating for the year $109.50; and, again, allowing the same value for food and labor to produce one and one-half pounds of beef or pork daily, sold at eight cenis per pound, we would receive only $41.80. Statistics tell us that Pennsylvania’s Poultry Yards yield from 15 to 20 millions of dollars’ worth of product annually, and that the United States produced $600,000,000 worth of poultry and eggs No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 369 during the past year, and Mr. T. E. Orr tells us, in his Bulletin No. 143, that Pennsylvania consumes five times ‘as much poultry and eggs as she produces annually. Now, is there another farm product of such vast importance to our every meal, the traffic in which has reached such vast proportions, and yet falls far short of meeting the daily demand. It is very certain that we, as farmers, are face to face with a good market for one of the best paying products that the land produces, and how many of us know it? Is it not time we were looking around and doing some figuring for ourselves, and not going on in the old ruts just because our neighbors do? There is a possibility of our not doing enough thinking for ourselves and not working out each for himself the possibilities of his own personal ability, loca- tion and surroundings. For many reasons it would not be possible for us all to be suc- cessful in the poultry business; but it is possible for many to suc- ceed better, supplying the market allowing from 75 to 100 per cent. more for a given amount of food and labor than the market thev have. One dozen of eggs is a small matter, so is one pound of soap, one loaf of bread, one quart of milk, or one box of matches, and lots of other things that enter into our daily needs, and how many of these numerous necessities are produced as a side issue without the care of a capable owner or manager? Nevertheless, the unassuming hen has produced as much value in the United States in the past year as the wheat crop, and more than the cow, and more than the combined earnings of the railroads, more than the receipts of the steel industry, and still she has not supplied the demand. With many mechanical devices and improved methods of to-day that make it possible to multiply the possibilities of the small opera- tor many times over, and a good market at his elbow, it would be very easy to double the output of the Pennsylvania Poultry Yard, and make the hen not a competitor of, but a leader in earning power, of all live-stock kept on the farm. The CHAIRMAN: What shall be done with this report, gentle- men? Moved and seconded that it be received, and placed on file. Agreed to. The CHAIRMAN: Has any one anything to say on this subject? We might devote a few minutes to its discussion. MR. CLARK: I had a set of Wyandottes that produced 150 eggs a year each, whici I sold at two cents a piece, or a total of $75.00. Now a hundred hens will cost about the same outlay of money as one cow, and will bring in about three hundred dollars. If you get a cow for the same amount of money, you would not have anything like the same amount of profit from her that you would from the hens. A Member: How many hens did you have in the set? MR. CLARK: Twenty-five. 350 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. A Member: You had them in a pen? MR. CLARK: Yes, and I would keep my hens in sets of ra -five to a pen; they are easier attended to. The CHAIRMAN: If there is nothing further on the subject, we will go on with our program. Is Prof. Cochran of West Chester present? It appeared that Prof. Cochran was still absent. The CHAIRMAN: Since Prof. Cochran is not present, what is the will of the Convention in regard to passing on to to-morrow’s pro- gram? The SECRETARY: I think we had better take up the question of Agricultural Education; that belongs to this evening’s program. The CHAIRMAN: I beg pardon; I didn’t notice that that is the next thing on the program. Our next subject then, is Agricultural Education, and the first speaker is Dr. Hays, of Washington. Is he in the room? It appeared that Dr. Hays was not in the room. The SECRETARY: I am sure that Dr. Hays expected to be here, and open this discussion, and I am entirely at a loss to know why he is not here this evening. The CHAIRMAN: Since the gentleman does not happen to be in the room, we will call on the next speaker, Prof. Van Norman of State College. Prof. Van Norman then spoke as follows: AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION, PART 1. By PROF. H. E. VAN NORMAN, State College, Pa. { am very sorry that Dr. Hays is not present. I was waiting tu hear him, so that I might get my cue from him. Education is being recognized as .omething more than can be learned in the district school, and we are coming to understand, too, more and more, that the college man is not the only one who may get an education; we can not all go to college, but we are realizing that a larger part of our educational work must deal with commer- cial men, such as you and me, and clder people who have gotten away from school. I propose, for the little time I occupy, to speak of some of the educational influences at work in our country, more particularly outside of our own State. The speaker who is to follow me may have something to say about these educational influences at work within, but I shall speak of those outside of Pennsylvania. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 391 Most of you know that our agricultural colleges were established as a result of the land grant act of 1863. These colleges had not long been engaged in their work of trying to teach the principles of science which underlie successful farm practice, when it became apparent that there was not only need of a class of men who knew the science, its application to the art, and had ability to impart the knowledge to others, but there was need of much experimental in- vestigation in order that many problems might be better understood. To meet this need Congress in 1887 passed the act that has given to every state in the Union an Experiment Station. In the beginning many of these stations were manned in part at least by men who had had no experience in the work they were to do. Is it any wonder that they found it difficult and that the farmer did not always ap- prove of their work, impatient as he usually is for immediate “prac- tical” results? Thanks to the farmers’ institutes and other agencies the past few years has demonstrated that the Experiment Station has a useful place and the results of their work are becoming more and more apparent. Not only are they showing us new truths, but they are helping to bring it to the attention of larger numbers of people, through the medium of cooperative or demonstration experiments conducted on the farms of private individuals in many parts of the severai states. In Canada they have several thousand men scattered throughout the country who are growing wheat, oats and crops of all kinds under the direction of the Central Experiment Station. The con- clusions drawn from their work are published and distributed throughout the country. Two results of this work are: first the good to the men who have done it under the direction of the Experiment Station. Second, any addition to the sum of our knowledge. Most of us are not like the electric motor moving steadily on be- cause of the constant pull of the unseen current, but we are rather like the gasoline engine with its noisy explosion every three or four revolutions of the wheel, increasing the speed which gradually lessens till the next charge is exploded; if the explosion fails to take place then the engine gradually comes to a stop. So with us, we need an explosion of some kind every now and then to keep us doing our best. There is no reason why most of us might not be conducting some experiments on our farms that would add to our knowledge and increase the profits of our business, but we need the additional incentive of the “doing it for the Experiment Station” to induce us to keep the record of careful observations that are required to make the work most helpful. . In Iilinois the Station hires the land needed in different localities and for a longer or shorter time conducts its experiments under the immediate supervision of its own trained men. Indiana last year had some five hundred cooperative experiments in progress, nearly every county in the state having at least one or more. They are of two classes: one in which a man from the Experiment Station goes to the outlying farm, selects a site to be planted, gives 292 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. directions for the work, and then when harvest time comes, he re- turns to help with the harvest, and note the results. This class of experiments are very helpful, because they are based on accurate observations. The next class is not so reliable, because they are carried out by men who the Station does not know, and it can not know how accurately the work may have been done. But in both instances they find the men on whose farms the work was done are very much interested, also the interest of the whole community is usually aroused. The neighboring farmers are apt to tell one another that “Bill Jones is carrying on one of those fool experiments from the college,” and if he is successful, they become interested, and maybe next year three or four of them write and want to make experiments for themselves. This is a line of work that is growing very rapidly, and is particularly appreciated in the states where it has been taken up. If will not go further in this line, because there is two much ground to cover. Illinois has led in getting its boys interested in the line of corr improvement. Then Indiana adopted the boy corn growers’ move- ment. The statement was made in my hearing that in one county they had formerly produced an average of 33 bushels of corn to the acre. ‘This year one hundred and forty boys, under eighteen years old, were each given an acre of ground in that county. These boys grew the corn under the general direction of a representative of the Experiment Station of that state. They selected the seed corn according to his directions, and plantec it according to his directions, and what do you suppose was the average yield? Over 74 bushels of shelled corn to the acre, or about 140 bushels, according to the way you farmers count your corn. Yet the yield in that county before had averaged only 33 bushels to the acre! Illinois is a great corn state, and they are interested in corn, as is shown by their experiments there, but our production is larger per acre than theirs. I[llinois took up the question, and the boys took it up, and prizes were offered. The latest development is one that I want to lay special stress on. A representative of the Experi- ment Station told me he went to several bankers of the state. Why to the bankers? Because they are quick to see an opportunity to make an investment. He succeeded in getting them to offer a prize to the boys in the schools of the county who would make the best showing raising corn. What is the prize; five or ten dollars, which is forgotten almost as soon as received? No; it is a course in the State College of eight or ten weeks. There they meet other boys, and their interest is further aroused. Now, this action of the bankers succeeded in getting the farmers in some of the counties interested, and they say “we don’t need the bankers to do that for our boys; we can do that ourselves,” and they are offering their own prizes, and not only getting the boys interested, but are getting better farm work as a result. The results of their work have been published and may be secured by those of you who wish to foilow it up. Let me refer now to a class of work in which I am especially interested: some of the extension work that is being done away from the college—away from the classic halls. At the late expo- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 393 sition at St. Louis, Minnesota twice out of three times won the high- est prize for the best tub of butter. It had the highest average of any state’s exhibit of butter there, and you known how hard it is to get a high average on a large number of entries. How did they get that average? Minnesota keeps a dozen or more skilled butter- makers traveling among her creameries helping their operators to overcome the fault in their buiter, and their exhibits at St. Louis with the long string of prizes showed the wisdom of this. Canada has largely taken from the United States our foreign mar- ket for butter and cheese. That is for two reasons: We created 4 prejudice against our products by adulteration. Then Canada went out to supply the market. They have over thirty traveling instruc- tors at work helping their factories make the kind of product the markets want. But the United States is waking up. Traveling instructors are at work in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Indiana, and to a slight extent in Ohio and New York; they are giving these instructions right where the men are who are doing the work. Another thing is the special trains that have been run through the west, and later on in New England, where they stop at the different stations twenty minutes and have men on the train selected for the purpose, to give lectures. The train 1s well advertised ahead, and is on time so that the farmers who gather to see the demonstration and hear the lecture lose no time waiting. Many come, hear and are prompted to action who never go to the farmers institute. These trains do a lot of good work. The Pennsylvania Railroad, which most people think is not inclined to do anything for farmers, has made arrangements to run a special train of this kind over every mile of their road in the State of Indiana. Then there is another educational feature—excursions to the college. Ontario was, I think, the first to develop the idea of far. mers’ excursions to the Experimental Stations. Their excursions bring in thousands of people in the course of a year. I have seen at the Michigan Agricultural College five thousand people on one occasion. Iowa runs excursions, and in two days last year 24,000 people visited the college and station. ‘Thev look around the station, and they become interested in the,experiments. You, who are here, are not so much in need of these things, but tor every one of you who is here, there are ten, fifty, a hundred, or even hundreds, who do need them to arouse their interest and get them started on the way they should go. Another influence for good, and [ wish I had words to paint more clearly than is possible, the benefit of a great State Fair. I wish ! could tell you of the great fair they hold each year in Chicago, and of the thousands of finely dressed, intelligent people who go there to see the magnificent display of fine animals on exhibition there—- the cattle, and the horses that cost thcusands of dollars a piece. The influence for good of an exhibition like this can not be measured. You go to these great shows, and look at these thorough-bred ani- mals, and you say “these are all right for the rich man, but we far. mer’s can’t expect to have them,” and then you go out and see the carloads of steers that have been fed on the grain grown by this great grain-growing country of ours, and you see things that wil! 26 394 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. help you by sending you home with broader ideas. Then go in and see the students from fifteen or twenty of our Agricultural Colleges, with note-books in hand, judging the diiferent specimens of cattle and horses, to develop their ability as judges. Then we come to the State Fair, where they are demonstrating butter making, and the Babcock test, hundreds of peopie stand there to listen and ask ques- tions. And then we go out to look at the agricultural machinery, and see the number of people who come to these State Fairs to see the different makes of manure-spreaders, cement posts, silos, fences, and all the other modern implements for farm work. We must see these things for ourselves; we can’t write all over the country to the different makers, and obtain any intelligent idea from their circulars, but we come to the Siate Fair, and listen to the salesmen, as they demonstrate the points of excellence of their particular make; we carry home a working idea. We know what we want when we are ready to buy. And I want to say right here that manufac- turers are having to employ a better class of salesmen from year to year than formerly, because the farmers demand it. The growth of educational influences through our State Fairs has been very marked in the past few years. These are some of the educational! influences that are going on outside of our schools and colleges. Take this matter of our corn showing, for instance; there is not one of you who goes out and looks at the different kinds of corn that are shown there, but will profit by it even if you don’t have anybody to point out to you the fact that very few of the ears have perfect buts or top. All of these things arouse your interest, and show you that there are very im- portant educational influences at work around us, many of them in our own State. But another speaker will have more to say on that. To sum up: Some of the educational influences at work in other states which we might consider with a view to adopting such as may be adapted to our conditions are: Co-operative field experiments on many farms. The boys’ corn growing contests with a course at the Agricultural College as the prize for the successful contestant. Traveling dairy instructors to help the butter makers and cheese makers, and to start cow testing associations. Special dairy, corn, and good farming grains. Excursions to the Agricultural College and Experiment Station. The International Live Stock Show. The National Dairy Show. The State Fair. The CHAIRMAN: I would again ask if Dr. Hays has entered the room since we have opened this discussion? It appeared he had not come. The CHAIRMAN: As Dr. Hays is net here, we will call on Mr. Bayard, of the “National Stockman and Farmer.” Thereupon Mr. Bayard read the following paper: No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 395 AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION, PART 2. By E. S. BAYARD, Editor, National Stockman and Farmer, Pittsburg, Pa. It is a hard job for a man whose hair is burdened with hay seeds to tell you anything about this subject after such students of and experts in agricultural education have discussed it. What I shall say has especial bearing on the problem before us here in Pennsyl vania, and I shall discuss only a part of that problem, for we have many branches of agricultural education—our Agricultural Depart- ment, our institutes, organizations, exhibits, papers, and our Experi- ment Station and College. None of these should or would interfere with each other were all developed to the limit of their possibilities. It has been said that the chief need of agricultural education in this State is men and money. That statement, while broadly true, needs certain qualifications. A million of money and a hundred professors more mean little to our educational advancement if the people are not brought into contact with the educating influence. And this I believe te be the greatest problem before those who are studying agricultural education in Pennsylvania to-day. _ It is a hard proposition, too, because the people can not be reached and interested without some outlay or money; and it is hard to get the money without having the people to back approp- priation bills. We can not expect to do it all at once, but let us assume, as we have a right to assume, in view of what has been done, that the people are sufficiently interested to supply funds to begin the campaign. On what lines shall we proceed to secure the backing necessary for the development of agricultural education? Or tn other words, how can we open avenues, and what avenues can we open, between the public and agricultural education that will lead to higher development of agriculture in this State? I propose to consider briefly a few things, some of them tried and tested, and others not. APPEALS TO CONSUMERS. In the first place, we must remember that in Pennsylvania a large proportion of the people are consumers, and they must be interested as consumers. They are not interested as producers and the arguments that appeal to producers are lost on them. Thus their influence is not secured by our present methods of seeking support for agricultural education and it never will be secured by such methods. They must be reached by arguments that touch them as consumers. I fully believe that a campaign carried on through the daily press would secure for our agricultural educa- tional institutions the support of many consumers. Pennsylvania has the best and highest markets in the world, and nobody knows how high they are as well as the consumer does or how inferior the quality of the shipped-in produce. He should be told the ad- 396 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. vantages in cheaper and better living which will result from a higher agricultural development in Pennsylvania, and if he is once convinced of the correctness of this idea he will support agricul- tural appropriation bills. And he should be shown, of course, that the State’s attention to other industrial education has not been wanting—that agriculture is seeking no favors not granted to other occupations now and heretofore. It seems to me that a literary bureau to attend to the education of the consumer on this and other subjects, notably, the selection, care and use of agricultural pro: ducts, would be a great boon to him, and ultimately to the pro- ducer also. But, of course, the efforts to bring the people and agricultural education together must be devoted principally to those who are or will be actively engaged in some branch of agriculture. It has been found in other states that if these people can be made to realize the benefits of agricultural education they will provide the means, and it may be so in Pennsylvania. I present a few sugges- tions which I think may assist the people to see and support meas- ures necessary in this State: CO-OPERATIVE EXPERIMENTS. have been found in some states, and notably in Ontario, Canada, a powerful means of advancing agriculture and interesting the people in agricultural education. Ontario has had over a thousand men and boys engaged in experiments under the direction of the Agricultural College at one time. The benefits are beyond com- putation to the boys and a greatly increased attendance at the college. It seems to me that Pennsylvania agriculture especially needs such a system. No state has a greater variety of soils, con- ditions of altitude and climate, and even of races of men, than Pennsylvania has; and nowhere could co-operative work be more useful to the people or the agricultural college. EXTENSION LECTURES. We have at the Pennsylvania Experiment Station (and State College) probably the oldest plots in this country on which experi- ments have been conducted continuously. The results of these years of treatment of land with different rations of plant food are known but not utilized. The figures may appear in bulletins, but they are almost a sealed book to the farmers of Pennsylvania so far as their practical value is concerned. Their lessons have not been interpreted. And if they were interpreted they could not be placed before the people of Pennsylvania in such a way that they would be of the highest value without a staff of men whose duty should be to present these and other lessons. There is need in the educational staff of Pennsylvania for men who might be called extension lecturers, to place before the farmers of the State the lessons which are taught by these and other investigations. Mod- ern photography and the ability to reproduce photographs before audiences afford ample means of bringing these truths vividly be- fore the people who need them. The farmers’ institute furnish the audiences. Let the Department of Agriculture supply the No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 397 people, as it does now, and let the value of agricultural education, and the results of agricultural investigation, be placed before them by the College and Experiment Station. The cost of this work should not be great. The interpretations and the results should be secured anyhow, and the photographs and the men to elucidate them should not be expensive. Such work is a link between the people and the agricultural educational institutions which must benefit both parties directly and indirectly. In the same line is demonstration work, especially of such processes as in dairying which can be completed in a short time and the results known. All these lecturers and demonstrators can be legitimately used to bring men under the influence of the educational institution either in their every-day work or by actual attendance upon it. Such a connection between the College of Agriculture and the public is one of the first and greatest necessities in this State. EXHIBITIONS. Some years ago I looked upon the exhibition of the Ohio Experi- ment Station at the Ohio State Fair. I had to look for it in those days, and so did everybody else. But so many people found it and asked so many questions of the men in charge each year that the Experiment Station resolved to make a bigger show next year. Interest in this exhibit has so increased that the Station has now so much space in Horticultural Hall that other exhibitors are beginning to accuse it of monopoly. ‘he people of Ohio are now asking, and no doubt will receive, an appropriation for a building on their State Fair Grounds for the special purpose of allowing the Experiment Station to bring befcre them seme of the results secured in their investigations. I do not advocate a State Fair in Pennsylvania simply because we have no State Fair; but right here is seen the great need of one. And it should be demanded by the people of Pennsylvania for this reason as well as for many others. This State can afford millions for adornment and not a sou for a State Fair, which would be a profitable investment finan- cially as well as otherwise. Let me read you a few extracts from letters which have been received in the past few days, and then you can see how thousands of farmers are reached in other states. We should be reaching them in the same way: “Michigan Experiment Station, “Cc. D. Smith, Director. “Agricultural College, Mich., CSienn, 1045 Wer “Hm. S. Bayard: “Dear Sir: Our station exhibit has been carried forward at the state fair for many years. During the season of 1966 we made a special effort, through a special appropriation from the state. Outside of this special appropriation, the Experiment Station on its own initiative, made an exhibit at Detroit at the main state fair and at Grand Rapids at the West Michigan Fair. This exhibit con- sisted of about half an acre of ground planted to the cereals of economic im- portance or of supposed economic importance. For instance, any of the cereals that were unusual, or with which the farmers were not familiar, were planted there, like the pennisetums or the kaffir corn or some of the newer millets. So in the legumes we had rows of soy beans, of different types of cowpeas, Blac Murarau, and so down the whole line of legumes we tried to have representatives at the fair. * * * * Iam here to report that the exhibit attracted a great deal of favorable comment and attention. It will be repeated on a larger scale next year. a 398 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. ~ “We made an exhibit of live stock not only at the State Fair, but at the West Michigan Fair and half a dozen other fairs, which were perhaps the largest in point of attendance of the county fairs. This was done under a special State appropriation for the purpcse. We had pens of swine, illustrating the influence of different rations. We had cattle, not only fat cattle, but dairy eattle, dairy cattle with records, scrub cows, pure bred cows, and fattened animals. Naturally we had large placards over these animals giving the records and showing why they were exhibited. A scrub cow would have no place at a fair except to illustrate the advantages of the pure bred animal and this we did by means of charts, and the same way with sheep. Thousands of visitors viewed these peus and plots. We had men stationed about both places to answer ques- tions, and possibly no more instructive feature was possible, at least none was presented at any fair which competed with our exhibit in value of the on- lookers. ; “A third feature of our exhibit was made by the station and college jointly and consisted of pressed plants, yarn frames, model of a horse to illustrate the line of draft, corn to illustrate the different types, a large exhibit from the Women’s Department, showing how sewing is taught and giving some specimens of the skill in needlework, views of the college, literature of the college, a very large fruit exhibit from the Experiment Station, three or four hundred plates of apples, grapes, peaches, with illustrations of spraying materials and methods of making spraying materials, exhibition of nozzles and methods of spraying, samples of the insect and fungous enemies of fruit plantations. This, in brief, is about the scope of our exhibit. I am very glad with you that the people of our State are much interested in the Experiment Station as is manifested by the fact that we have forty-three thousand names on our mailing list and that our list of students is gradually growing longer. “Yours truly, “(Signed) C. D. SMITH.” “Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, “Chas. E. Thorne, Director. “Wooster, Ohio, “Jan. 14, 1907. “Mr. E. S. Bayard: “Dear Sir: Replying to yours of the 10th inst., I would say that the exhibit of this Station at the Ohio State Fair has been a matter of evolution. When I took charge of the farm of the State University, in 1877, I began at once making smiall exhibits at the State Fair, the first exhibits being limited to samples of different varieties of wheat which were being grown on the University Farm. When the Experiment Station was established in 1882, it took up this work. I think that the college farm relinquished it at once entirely, or nearly so, to the Experiment Station at that time; then when the entire farm was turned over to the conirol of the Station the exhibits, of course, went with it. I believe they have been kept up continuously, with little or no intermission, since the period T have mentioned, and have grown from a little show, occupying 6 or 8 linear feet of space in one of the buildings of the fair to the one of last year, which extended around two sides of their great horticultural building occupying a total of 160 linear feet. I could only give the crudest estimate of the number of visitors which seek information at this exhibit, but during busy days of the fair for many years past there has been a constant stream of visitors passing for six or eight hours each day, many of whom stop to ask for information. In our first exhibits one or two men at most were amply sufficient to take care of the whole exhibit, but for the last two years almost the entire scientific staff of the Station has been present, with their assistants, and each man has been taxed to the limit of his physical strength to keep up the work. “At the urgent solicitation of numerous county agricultural societies we have sent this exhibit to as many such as could be accommodated during the fair season. Last fall we chartered a freight car for this purpose, moving it from one fair to another during the season. I already have on file several applications for next season’s exhibit. “Yours truly, “CHARLES E. THORNE, Director.”’ “Tniversity of Illinois, “College of Agriculture and Agricultural Experiment Station, “KE. Davenport, Dean and Director. “Urbana, Ill., Jan. 16, 1907. “Mr. E. S. Bayard: “Dear Sir: In answer to your questions will say (1) the Illinois experiment station exhibited at the Illinois State Fair in 1899 for the first time; (2) the amount of space given to the station by the State Board of Agriculture is 40 feet square. We have had this space from the first time that we exhibited with- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 399 out any change whatever. We did not, however, in our first exhibits fill all this space but allowed some other person, usually a representative of some farm paper, to occupy a portion of our allotted space. The past two or three years, however, we have filled our space entirely, and have wished for more. It is almost impossible for us to give an estimate of the number of visitors that seek information at the exhibit of the station. Some days there will be many more than on other days, and at some hours of the day they will be much more numerous than at others. It -has been the privilege of the writer to have charge of the exhibit at the State Fair for a number of years, and during that time I have known the space to be practically crowded with people seeking informa- tion and examining the exhibits, so much so that we have had hundreds in two or three hours. Usualiy we find the largest numbers seeking information will come from 10 to 12 in the morning, and from 1.30 to 4 in the afternoon. Aside from these hours it is seldom that we have any visitors seeking informa- tion unless it has been some one who had been there before, and failed to secure the information he desired. -It is not always the men that go to the exhibit for information, but many ladies as well * * * *” “Our State Fair exhibit is becoming more popular, and is attracting greater attention each year, inasmuch as we are attempting to show the results of our soil and crop work in detail there. We have the experiment farm located here at Urbana, represented in miniature, with the crops growing on the different plots even as they would be seen here at the station. Together with this we have a statement for a number of years back, giving the yields, crops grown, effect of fertilizers, if any, ete. We have also in other portions of state, other than here at Urbana, crop production fields, one at Fairfield, Wayne county, one at DeKalb, DeKalb county, and one at Sibley, Ford county. This coming fall will complete three years’ work on the field at Fairfield, Wayne county. Therefore we shall include in our exhibit a miniature reproduction of the Fairfield field with the crops growing upon the different plots even as they would be seen there. This will crowd to some extent our space, but we feel confident that the interest shown and the information given in this way is of sufficient value to warrant the crowding of our exhibit quite materially. “Trusting that this will be satisfactory to you, and will be of service to you, Iam, “Very truly yours “(Signed) O. D. CENTER.” “University of Wisconsin, “Agricultural Experiment Station, “Madison, Wis., January 17, 1907. “Mr. BE. S. Bayard: “My Dear Sir: Yours of recent date to hand, and I note what you say re- garding the exhibit at the State Fair. The Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Association made this exhibit for the first time this year. We used a booth about thirty feet in width and about twenty in depth. * * #* “At the International Live Stock Exposition we made an exhibit from the College of Agriculture, using about sixty feet of wall space. We also showed a part of the Wisconsin Experiment Association Exhibit at this exhibit. “At both places there were so many thousand people visiting our exhibit and listened to talks concerning various phases of the exhibit that it would be very hard for me to make any estimate of the number. Our exhibits at both places were well received by the directors and by the people in general. “T feel that the Wisconsin Experiment Association is doing a great good for the farmers of Wisconsin. The organization was effected in 1901 and has now a membership of practically (paid-up) one thousand. The membership is scat- tered so widely over cur state that they place before many farmers in Wiscon- sin demonstrations that can be done with pure-bred seed grains and forage plants. 0-37) .e*)F “Sincerely yours, “R. A.. MOORE.” LOCAL EXHIBITIONS. If Pennsylvania has not a State Fair, it has many local fairs. Why could not exhibits and lecturers or expounders be utilized at these fairs? A few more exhibits must be provided for, and a few more men used; but by properly arranged circuits a few exhibits could be made to cover in a few years the entire State at com- paratively small expense. But it takes two parties to make satis 400 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. factory arrangements of this kind. The State has no right to say to these local fairs that its exhibits shall be given room, or that a part of the expense shall be borne. I have therefore written to several of the local fairs in various parts of the State to secure a few expressions from them. Here are a few of them: “The Great 19¢7 Pulaski Fair. “Pulaski, Pa., January 14, 1907. “Mr. E. S. Bayard, Sec’y, Pittsburg, Pa.: “Dear Sir: Replying to yours of the 10th inst., will say that in my opinion the Experiment Station Exhibit you mention would be of a very great use in the locality, not only as an educator, but as an exhibit of interest to all the farmers of this community, and would most certainly draw as an attraction, and to say our Association would be willing to give space, I can assure you of that being done in Agricultural Hall, and I feel certain that we would defray traveling ex- penses and hotel accommodations to the manager, if not exorbitant, which I know they would not be. I will confer with the board in a day or two, and will yrite you more fully as to this last matter. “Very truly yours, “JAMES S. WOOD, “Sec’y.” “Union Agricultural Association, “Burgettstown, Pa., Jan. 12, 1907. “HS. Bayard, Sec’y, Pittsburg, Pa.: “My Dear Sir: Replying to your communication, coming from you as Sec’y of the ‘Penn’a Live Stock Breeders’ Association,’ in regard to an Experiment Station exhibit at county fairs, I think such an exhibition would be an attrac- tion to our fair worth very much more to our peopie than the probable cost. I think our Association would be ready to meet all the requirements as to cost and room, “Gur board will meet in February, date not fixed yet. I will bring the matter to the attention of the board at this meeting and will be able to write you more definitely. “Very respectfully yours, “R, P. STEVENSON, Sec’y.” COLLEGIATE EDUCATION. No doubt it has dawned on you all before this that I have confined my suggestions to plans which largely involve our agricu! tural educational institutions at State College. This is for a reason, and that reason a dual one. First, our other educational institu- tions are largely provided for by existing laws; and second we must build our permanent structure on the foundation of education of the young. The farmer of the present must be reached in any way and at any time that we can reach him. But the farmer of the future must be sent to school for a longer or a shorter term. I am aware that Pennsylvania’s Agricultural School has not had what it should have had, and has not been what it should have been. But a better day is coming. It is preparing to carry out its primary purpose, agricultural education. It is seeking men, and has found some, but money must come to support them. We must give it o them out of our State Treasury if Pennsylvania is to get into 1ine with other states. In the past we have heard charges of fos- silization, of lack of usefulness, brought against this institution. This must not be so in the future, and will not be possible except to the jaundiced mind. All such things, along with the attempt te control things by any political clique, should be swept into the No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 401 scrap heap of the past. We want no antagonisms in our college or over it. Our only antagonists should be ignorance and prejudice—the two foes of agricultural education in all times and places. Responsi- ble heads are being secured, and let us hold them responsible. If we give proper support to our agricultural educational institutions, there will be no excuse fur any farmer not being helped by them. If we give our institutions a start, the things which I have named, or something as good, will come to pass, to the immediate and permanent betterment of things agricultural in this State. Impress the men who vote money for agricultural education with the nec- essity for such a start, and the people wiil see that they keep it a-going. I have faith in our people. If they do not wake up this year, they will sometime, because they must. But your support is needed NOW for a State Fair and for an agricultural school. The agricultural press, that noble army of men who march under the glorious banner whereon is inscribed the stirring words “Now is the time to subscribe,” is backing this cause. The farmers’ organizations are backing it. And if individual farmers will back it we shall have more progress to record in the next five years than in all the previous years of our history. The CHAIRMAN: Since Dr. Hays does not appear to have come, we shall be pleased to hear from any one in the room on this sub- ject, for a short time. _ MR. WELD: I notice that there is with us this evening one who is interested along the line that has been talked of, and I have no doubt but that every one here will be glad to hear from him. I refer to Dr. Welch of the State College. The CHAIRMAN: We shall be very glad to hear from Dr. Welch. Dr. Welsh then spoke as follows: ADDRESS OF DR. WELCH. Gentlemen: I have been very much pleased with what I have heard bere tonight, up to this point; 1 was especially pleased to hear the Press make itself heard in behalf of education, particu- larly Agricultural Education, because I have been interested in it for a good many years. For the past few months I have beeu especially interested, because I have been placed in a position where I am expected to look after the financial condition of the Penn- Sylvania State College, and, following what has just been said, I presume it would not be out of piace for me to tell you some of the things that I have found. A few months ago I didn’t know any more about the financial] condition of the college, or the way the State of Pennsylvania had been taking care of the college, than any one else here, but when I went there and began to get at the bottom of things, I learned some things that surprised me, and will, I presume, sup- prise you. In the first place, I heard before I went there that the Penn- sylvania State Coilege has been sailing under the banner of Agri- 26—T—1906. 402 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. culture, while spending the money for many other things. I want to say that when I came to look into the matter, I found that every dollar that has ever been appropriated toward it in the State of Penn- sylvania, has gone for exactly the purpose for which it was appro- priated, and that if anybody was to blame, it was the fellows who did the appropriating. Every dollar has gone to its place. When I first went there, I heard the same complaints in regard to results under previous administrations, and this is what I found: I want to say that it was a matter of some surprise to me that any results could be secured under some of the administrations, because of the meager support that was given them. You will be surprised to learn that in looking over the condition of the college, I found that it is $15,000 behind in its coal bill. They had either to say to the boys “you go home; we have no more money to keep you warm,” or to borrow money to keep them warm. The bill that was presented to the House a few weeks ago contained this item of $15,000, and I think it is clear to the world that there must be heat and light for the boys, and that they must be paid for. I have been comparing the support in this State towards the Department of Agriculture, with other states. There are men here who can give these items better than I can, but when we compare the appropriations in Pennsylvania with those in Iowa and Ohio, it should make everybody in Pennsylvania who has anything to do with appropriations ashamed. That we have not been doing great things, is due more to the fact that while the rest of the world has been moving on, we have been standing still in Penn- Sylvania. We have not been supporting Agriculture. It is true that large sums of money have been appropriated by the State to the college for other purposes, but the reason for this is that there has been a great pressure on the part of these boys to go into these other departments. For instance, they have a school there called the School of Engineering, which includes Electrical, Mechanical and Civil Engineering. It is calculated for four hundred students, and there are six hundred in it now, and more want to come in. The appropriation there has been entirely too meager to take care of what has been done, and is doing there now. The other day, just to see how many of these boys represented the soil of Pennsylvania, I looked for the number of boys in the Department of Agriculture, and found them about one hundred and fifty to one hundred and seventy-five as against nine hundred in the other departments. Now, under the laws of the United States Government, and the laws of Pennsylvania, the Pennsyl vania State College was established for the purpose of encouraging Agriculture and the Mechanic Arts, and for extending the liberal education along other lines that are ‘now being emphasized by the United States Government. It is right that the State of Pennsy]- vania should give to the young men the all-round education provided for under the law, and I am here tonight on your invitation, and I want to plead for all the departments of the Pennsylvania State College, all and every one of them: The Department of Agriculture, the Department of Mathematics, the Department of Literature, of Engineering, the School of Political Economy, all have in view one common good, and these departments are knit together, one No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGPICULTURE. 403 depending on the other for evolution. The entire school should have the support of this great State of Pennsylvania, that has an annual income of over $20,000,000 to dispose of. So I say that J feel that the time has come for every department of.that great institution to be properly supported, and I have been asked by the Board of Trustees to give them such data as will enable them to submit a bill for support to the coming Legislature that will put every department strongly on its feet. Tomorrow there will be a meeting of that Board of Trustees, and when that bill comes up it will contain exactly what is needed to put every department of this college squarely on its feet, and then I think if there are any criticisms coming, they will be due to those who do the appro. priating, and not to those who are managing the institution. I believe that the people of Pennsylvania want this college to be taken care of, not simply in Agriculture, but I think they want to take a long stride in Agriculture for having stood still so long, although we don’t want to spend more on that than on any other part of the college. I don’t know, Mr. Chairman, that I can say anything more, but I thank you for the opportunity of saying these few words. The CHAIRMAN: Has any one anything further to say on this subject. It is drawing pretty near time to adjourn, but we shall be glad to hear a little more if any one has anything to say. COL. DEMMING: Before we adjourn, the Mineralogist of the Board respectfully asks the Chairman to submit his report tomor row evening, instead of tomorrow morning, for the reason that he is required to be in another county in court, not as a criminal, but as an expert witness. The SECRETARY: Would you be prepared to make it this even- ing? _COL. DEMMING: No, sir. The CHAIRMAN: Would you be prepared to make it late to- morrow afternoon? COL. DEMMING: I will try to, but I am not sure. The CHAIRMAN: We will simply have to wait until you can come. PROF. VAN NORMAN: Mr. Chairman, I want to make the an- nouncement that our milking machine is here, and our man who is to operate it, will be prepared to do so at nine o’clock tomorrow morning, at four o’clock tomorrow afternoon, and at ten o’clock tomorrow evening, and at the same hours the next day. The but- ter is in the cold storage house, and will be exhibited Thursday. We have no good place to keep it in, so have made these arrange- ments. The milk that is sent in will be examined by the dairy experts from Washington, and report made to you on same. The SECRETARY: Before adjournment, I wish to announce that we still have some cards here, showing the location of the different ele with their rates, for the benefit of those who may require them. 404 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. The CHAIRMAN: We have reached the end of our program and the hour is growing late. A motion to adjourn will be in order. On moticn, the meeting was adjourned until 9 a. m. Wednesday morning. Harrisburg, Pa., Wednesday Morniug, 9 o’clock, January 23, 1907. The meeting came to order with Vice-President P. S. Fenster- maker in the chair. The CHAIRMAN: The first number on the program is the report of Dr. William Frear, State Chemist; is he here? It appeared that Dr. Frear was not present at the time. The CHAIRMAN: The report of the Mineralogist has been post- poned, so we will take the next one. Is Prof. Surface ready to make his report? Prof. Surface was reported as not being in the room at that time. The CHAIRMAN: We will proceed to the Report of the Commit- tee on Fertilizer, if Mr. McGowan, the Chairman, is here. Mr. McGowan then read his report, which is as follows: REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON FERTILIZER. By Hon. HOWARD G. MCGOWAN, Chairman. The term is broad in its meaning, which would commonly include all substances that tend to increase the fertility of our land. No subject is of greater importance to our agricnitural people than is that of Fertilizer. The fertility of a man’s farm is the mainspring to his business. It is his bank account. It is his reserve fund, from which he can draw upon, to supply that which erables the farmer to conduct his business remuneratively. Therefore, every farmer should look more carefully after the fertility of his land. Many homes would be happier, farms richer, and the spirit of contentment would pervade, where very frequently we find from the want of proper fertilization, the farm becomes poor, unyielding in crops, much to the discouragement of the farmer, and discontent of his family. Even the boys and girls will not so soon become rest- less when the farm is rich and abundant in crop production. The proper care of the farm manure, which is our main fertilizer, is first to be considered by every farmer. This caution has been so frequently referred to, and impressed upon the minds of our farmers by the agricultural papers and Farmers’ Institute lectur- ers, that it needs only a word of continued vigilance from our com- mittee. We know of very many instances, however, where farm manure as a fertilizer is very much disregarded. In some parts of our country it is even dumped into ravines. In Missouri, not No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 405 in Pennsylvania, it is dumped by the roadside, while in Oregon it is given away for the asking. Im these instances they need the teaching of Farmers’ Institutes. We feel that the term “fertilt- zer” largely applies to commercial fertilizers in our connection, and to this end we will dwell for a few moments and suggest a few things. We would recommend the Commercial Fertilizer be not depended upon entirely for the fertility of our land, but, be used as a valua- ble aid to assist in crop production, after the most judicious care has been taken of all other sources of fertility. Commercial Fertilizers are costly, make high bills for the far- mer, and in Pennsylvania thousands of dollars are uselessly spent by our farmers. The use of Commercial Fertilizer in Pennsylvania from all sources where we have had any opportunity of obtaining information, has, during the last year, far excelled that of any for- mer year in our history. Farmers are becoming more and mor2 expert (some are not, however), in baying fertilizers intelligently by adhering more closely to the analysis which is printed on the sack, as is now provided by law. Three elements control the value of any fertilizer and they are too well known to speak of at any length, viz: Nitrogen or Ammonia, Phosphoric Acid, and Potash. By using a little arithmetic any one can ina short time calculate the value of any brand of Commercial Fertilizer on the market today. Vast sums of money are uselessly spent annually by the farmers of our State by not taking the proper pains in making calculations before purchasing. They simply buy a fertilizer by its name and not by what it is worth on the market. This hap- hazard way of buying fertilizer, (not by all) is like buying a suit of clothes for so much cash, and not taking into account its real value. A ten dollar suit is worth about that amount, and we know it. When we have asked some farmers in our experience what kind of a fertilizer they use on their farms, in many instances they would say about $18.00 goods or $20.00 goods, as the case may be. This reany does not indicate anything at all. If, on the other hand, you would ask him what kind of a fertilizer he uses and he tells you 1, 8, 4, or 2, 8, 10, or 10, 5, as the case may be, you can just put it down that he knows just what he is doing, so far as the law is at present. We would recommend for consideration by this Board of Agri- culture, if it would not be advisable to press upon the present Legislature, to pass a law in reference to placing upon the outside of each sack of fertilizer, not only the analysis as it now is but state from what source the different ingredients are derived. While, as I said before, we may buy intelligently as far as we can, but would not the farmer be fairer dealt with if he would know from what source he was obtaining the different elements in the compo- sition of the fertilizer? The Department of Agriculture has been aiding the farmer, very greatly, by having samples of fertilizers collected all over the State and subsequently having them analyzed at the State College by the State Chemist. This work is done (and is generally known) for the purpose of ascertaining whether the contents of the sack, is just what is printed on the outside of it. Sometimes farmers 406 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. ask the question: “What is the consequence if the analysis on the bag does not conform, or come up, to the statement on the bag? Is the manufacturer informed of it, and forced to make good to the users of such fertilizers?” In reply, please let me say that from direct knowledge, our present Secretary, Hon. N. B. Critchfield, has been doing all within his power to bring parties to an account whose goods upon the market were found deficient in value accord- ing to printed or guaranteed analysis. In one instance, to my knowledge, the Secretary brought suit against a certain manufac- turer and personally saw to it that said manufacturer made proper restitution or refunded the amount of loss that parties suffered by the analysis being deficient. True, a fine is collected also, as a punishment. But, as the present act makes it a fine of only $25.00, we, the Committee on Fertilizer, think, and would suggest, that this fine should at least be $200.00 instead of $25.00. We also beg to suggest, as the Committee on Fertilizer, that it would be wise and expedient in order that the law might be more closely guarded, to establish a “Bureau of Fertilizer and Feed Con- trol.” Under this head prompt prosecutions could be brought, and in all cases where any shortage occurs, it would be the duty of this Bureau to prosecute, and thus leave no manufacturer go unpunished, whose goods did not meet the requirements of the act. This Bu- reau would be under the supervision of the Secretary of Agricul- ture; The CHAIRMAN: Gentlemen, what is your pleasure in regard to this paper? Moved and duly seconded and agreed to that it be received and placed on file. The CHAIRMAN: We might devote a few minutes to the dis- cussion of this paper if any one has anything to say. A Member: With your permission, Mr. Chairman, I would like to ask whether there is not on the statute books ot our State, a law that if the fertilizer does not come up to the standard stamped on it, the manufacturer is at fault, and is liable to prosecution? ~The SECRETARY: No; there is no statute, but my impressiou is that there is a common law that if the consumer or purchaser does not get the value of the goods, the manufacturer is expected to make good the amount, but there is nothing in our fertilizer law as it now stands. The law, as it now stands, simply states that there shall be placed on the sack the name of the manufacturer, the place where it is made, the percentage of Phosphoric acid, soluble and insoluble, and Potash. The law provides that any person who places upon the market goods that are not so marked or goods that contain a larger percentage of these fertilizing in- gredients, is guilty of misdemeanor and can be fined not less than $25.00 nor more than $100.00. A Member: I don’t think that there is a subject that can come up at this meeting in which the farmers are more deeply interested than in this subject of fertilizers. There is nothing that we pur- chase on the farm for which we spend more money than we do on No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 407 fertilizers, and when I buy fertilizer I want to know from what sources the ingredients are secured. I think there should be a law compelling them to publish that. I have a little farm of twenty- seven acres in Chester County, and that farm is my chemist, and it is better than any Professor. I have a friend within a few miles, who has a little farm, and he has the potash right on the road. You can see it there, as you walk or drive by. He does not need any potash, but on my farm I need it. I want all the potash I can get, but I find that what will produce a crop on one acre will not do su on another. And I have no doubt that many farmers spend thou- sands of dollars in applying fertilizer without knowing just what is the best for that soil. Now, I went through this, and at consid- erable expense, so I know there is no subject in which the farmers are more deeply interested than in fertilizers. The SECRETARY: There is a bill before the House now, requir- ing manufacturers of fertilizers to show not only the amount of nitrogen and phosphoric acid, but where it was secured. Then if the farmer wants something that will act quickly he can get his nitrogen and soda, and if he wants something that will act a little more slowly he can get his dry blood, and if something that acts more slowly still, he can get his raw bone. The bill says that when these things are stamped on the bag, the manufacturer shall stop right there, and not go on and give any further information, because it would be misleading. MR. SCHWARZ: I am very glad to see that the farmers are tak- ing interest in this. Twelve years ago, when I was in the Legisla- ture, a bill was passed, largely through my efforts on this subject, and I am glad to see that the farmers are progressing along this line. MR. BECK: I am glad to say that when the bill Mr. Critchfield refers to was up before the Legislative Committee yesterday, there was no opposition to it, and it is likely to pass. The SECRETARY: I am glad to know that it is moving along so nicely. The CHAIRMAN: I see Dr. Frear is here now, and we will take up his report—the report of the Chemist. The report reads as follows: EXPERIMENTS WITH LIME AND CRUSHED LIMESTONE ON A PENNSYLVANIA CLAY LOAM SOIL. By DR. WM. FREAR, Chemist, State College, Pa Owing to the live interest exhibited today in the relative merits of lime and crushed limestone (carbonate of lime) as means of increasing the productiveness of soils—an interest shown by numerous inquiries received by the writer and by the frequency with which the subject is discussed in the agricultural press—it has been thought that a summary of the results obtained in experi- 408 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. ments upon the subject at the Pennsylvania Experiment Station might well be presented at this time. Permit me at the outstart to present a brief statement of the present practice in Pennsylvania and to note some of the claims made by advocates of the two agents to be compared. Pennsylvania is richly supplied with limestone, in strata readily accessible in the eastern counties, less easily reached in the western and northwestern counties and entirely lacking in the exposed strata of the northern and the extreme western parts of the Com- monwealth. The use of lime, as shown by a careful inquiry made several years ago, is extensively practiced by the majority of Penn- sylvania farmers, especially by those whose lands are clays or heavy loams. Even in communities where, for a time, the intro- duction of commercial fertilizers led to the abandonment of liming, the occasional use of lime has again come into vogue as a valuabie means of controlling the conditions of crop production. The use of carbonate of lime, except as it has been applied in the form of wood ashes to the orchards and gardens on the stony hillsides of our northern counties, has on the other hand, been very limited. The general consensus of opinion, based upon the extensive local experience in the practice of liming, is, that lime is an excellent agent for the maintenance of good tilth on heavy lands; that, when prop- erly used, it greatly increases the crops produced, and leads to no ob- servable deterioration of lands of strong character; and that it is a specific for the treatment of our soils. There are many communities, however, where the old saying, ‘Lime enriches the father, but im- poverishes the son,’ is frequently heard, especially with reference to farms on which care has not been taken to maintain the humus and nitrogen supplies by careful husbanding of the straw and manure, and by the skillful use of green manuring. The need for the exer- cise of caution in liming light lands, lest they become over alkaline or be injured in texture, is quite generally recognized. The advocates of the use of crushed limestone and other carbon- ates of lime, in place of lime (caustic of slacked lime), claim that the carbonate performs practically ali of the functions of lime in the soil and should be preferred because it is the compound in which nature furnishes this valuable alkaline earth. Lime is said, by them, to work too rapidly and therefore wastefully, especially in the destruction of humus and the conversion of the insoluble stores of nitrogen into soluble forms that, because present in excess, produce stem and leaf out of proportion to grain, and that leach away in drainage waters before the crops can utilize them. Lime is further said on the basis of many laboratory observations, to retard the de- velopment of certain valuable soil bacteria, especially those that gradually convert the slightly available humus nitrogen into highly available nitrates; whereas, carbonate of lime is declared to be always helpful, rather than prejudicial to the best development of these little friends of the tiller of the soil. The results to be considered shed some light upon a number of points in the controversy. The field experiments included from a part of the general fertilizer experiments begun at State College in 1880 and still in progress—the longest continued series of fertilizer experiments in America. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 409 The soil is a rather heavy clay loam overlying and formed from the Silurio-Cambrian limestone strata of Nittany Valley, a soil probably to be classed- with the so-called “Hagerstown loam,” which forms a part of the limestone lands of northern Lancaster county and of Cumberland Valley. The writer has not had opportunity to an- alyze completely the rocks underlying the soil in question, but analyses of samples taken from corresponding strata nearby show very small amounts of clay and iron, and even very little carbonate of magnesia. The soil used for the experiment plots was not analyzed at the beginning of the experiments. It is probably represented fairly, however, by samples taken from a neighboring field showing sim- ilar characters. The soil sampled had never been limed nor inten- sively treated with commercial fertilizers. Despite its limestone origin, this soil contains only 0.26 per cent. of lime and 0.35 per cent. of magnesia, with merely 0.39 per cent. of carbonic acid—an amount sufficient to form carbonate with barely one-fifth of the lime, which, with the magnesia, must therefore be present in other states of combination. Crop experience on these lands shows little need for potash fertilizers, for most crops and analyses show as much as 34 per cent. of potash, .039 per cent. quite available. Experience shows, however, a pronounced advantage from the use of phosphates, whether acidulated or non-acidulated, despite the presence of .124 per cent. of phosphoric acid (P,O,;), an amount fully equal to the av- erage in the Eastern States. Of this fully one-tenth appears to be available, judging by the action of mild solvents. The soil was found to contain a fair amount, 2.2 per cent., of active humus, and a moderate quantity of nitrogen, .116 per cent. Of the latter, con- stituent, about one-fortieth was present in the form of ammonium salts and over one-tenth in the form of nitrates—the samples having being taken in late summer when the land was in corn, conditions favoring a large accumulation of nitrates. Laboratory experiments were made by mixing lime at the rate of 150 bushels per acre with the soil, keeping it moist for three months and then allowing it to dry gradually. At the close of a year the availability of the potash and phosphoric acid had been distinctly increased, the active humus had been reduced nearly one-third, and the proportion of nitrogen had somewhat diminished. The quan- tity of ammonia was much reduced, and, despite the alkalinity of the soil, the absolute quantity and the proportion of nitrate nitrogen had as clearly increased. Of the large quantity of lime applied, less than one-half had been converted to carbonate, a fact contra- dicting the opinion of those who hold that caustic lime is sure to be promptly carbonated in the soil. It should be remembered that the soils bore no crops during the time of the laboratory experiments. In the general fertilizer experiments conducted under the ordinary four-course rotation of corn, oats, wheat and hay (mixed clover and timothy),-four plots have received dressings of 4,000 pounds of stone lime slaked after weighing and applied upon the land after plowing for corn. Four others have received similar applications to the wheat and the corn of 4,000 pounds of crushed limestone, har- rowed into the plowed ground. In 1859 the whole farm wag heavily 27 410 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. limed and has until recently shown little need for the use of this ma- terial. Great gains from liming should from this fact, not have been expected. It is at once apparent that the frequent liming at the rate of 50 bushels of stone lime per acre during the long period of these experiments, is an extreme test ef the effects of the method. The actual quantities of lime applied in the two forms during a rotation are not far different. The cost of the lime was 5 cents per bushel, equivalent to $2.50 per acre, while the cost of the fine crushed limestone was $6.50 per ton on the average, equivalent to $26 per acre during a rotation. This cost may be greatly reduced by pur- chasing the crushed stone in large quantities, but will remain much greater than the cost of the fine powder obtained by slaking burnt lime. The quantities of the several crops obtained on the two lots of four plots each, receiving the several treatments, during twenty years, or five complete rotations, the yield of the adjacent unfertil- ized plots being taken as 100, were: Combined Yields for Five Rotations. é g oe g | 38 5 = Corn: SATE Sy rarels x iminim stele vicla-< alalotelotatesere/elavere,ats lars) piayeieis AgAoSooesoI En dadas ae soagod78oe GoSsNaS OARS S= 84.3° 92 0 SIEM] CE OD Pe claire’ ein ofcinls aloie’ joie ssole} win! lesa) leteinveinale wie nin p]aim ain aleie steleloeiteteb teen peeiataeisieia cleisiemtats 86.7 94.0 GERI | Waseciere sista ciciarew ciein via loicie’o|sininiaicleiein tielw amin cloibielsielelel six eltiewictslale elotaetcticinirieltieiatele ee tiemiaterst 102.8 BPRGTR UATE. (CTOP site oicie)-vinien's cteieeleie nieisintsa/alacatniae eicielaisipipters’sistemieiciolstalnieleietammipiststactare ister steeteciars 108.3 119.0 Wheat: RAT aio Ssiatctate ajes ois csu ses erate chovole oiojeve ithe evelsle alare(aloieve aravelsiate)stolele eiete’eiatalsteloteletetetetane te taleiaieiats eiereiciaie 106.8 110.4 Wn lire vCLOp] | come aisle stele veicisiciomnisisiciein «iatelata/e maiero sions alainele niete siete siete eee eeeisiem araincies 107.0 112.0 ISCAS BgHOBHObOoUNODAScoDEe OnE cucouDUsoTedadacoe cUdsochandasacaoconoospodsacocodemacocogacar 91.8 103.6 That is to say, in each case the yields with the carbonate of lime showed superiority under the conditions of this experiment over those following an equivalent application of caustic lime. After each of these treatments, however, the corn yield was depressed. The yield of threshed oats was depressed by the lime and little affected by the carbonate; but both increased the total crop, the car- bonate most. Both treatments were followed by an increased yield of wheat—grain and straw—a slight advantage again appearing on the side of the carbonate. Lime greatly depressed the following hay crop, however, while carbonate slightly increased it. The total application of lime in five rotations was very large, amounting to 10 tons per acre, equivalent to 0.5 per cent. of this soil taken to the depth of 8 inches. So that, if the lime were not largely removed by descent to subsoil or by solution in drain waters, nearly 1 per cent. of carbonate of lime could be formed from it in the surface soil. This percentage is not usually considered high enough to threaten injury to crops on heavy loams. It is desirable, nevertheless, to compare the effects of the lime and No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 411 carbonate treatments during the first and last rotations, to observe whether any action is manifest as a result of the accumulation of calcium carbonate in the soil. The comparative yields for these ro- tations, expressed in ratio with the yields of the adjacent unfertil- ized plots for the same years, are given below: Lime. Carbonate. g B B 8 a= J ~~ ~ : : : é Pa i ‘a Be R = a = = ne La ae & & E E Corn: 1D Sige pe paGA CS ROCE EC HE GOOU ACER DOPED EEG obucor buds 91.0 82.8 | 110.6 112.4 Peed ERE Ce OD) sericea stamiaitiare cisiaia aisia/e oie\e talons o\n)e/e,< =i 91.4 88.1 | 115.0 110.5 Oats: (nniee ~bAasebontecacdmodsocun docsoodeL Ep adartendcnec 94.3 83.6 104.0 | 110.5 RAEI CLOD Ure ete ena ee eso ee ne ano ele solic oels 99.5, 109.2 115.6 | 118.8 Wheat: d TERTITE oSedersnce oCem nc ma SC BOUn bode COC Ona CAeracas 94.4 108.9 86.2 | 119.8 INES Ce CHO Bape Fate ce icise etnies \eloiers/«.6/s\e'sielcvale\n > (nninpm)a/olnie 92.7 109.9 88.5 | 122.2 PE Reap yn oes atarenclaictaelaisis she s(a/eiminsa) clnielsiet sta eralelele niate ole sictvisie 87.8 95.9 98.6 | 118.0 Judging from these data the heavy applications of lime injured corn and oat grain yields more after the first rotation, but the crops of intermediate rotations show that it was not a distinctly increasing degree. On the other hand, the use of lime depressed the wheat yield at first, but increased it in later rotations and injured hay less. The varbonate shows little change in effect upon corn and oats during later rotations, but depressed the wheat and hay yields at first and imereased them in later years. Certain crop peculiarities are apparent in consequence of these treatments: The leaves of corn on the carbonate plots have a healthy green color; those of plauts on the lime plots are yellow when young, and striped with deep red colors when mature. On both sets of plots clover far exceeds timothy; the ratios between ear and stalk show a slight increase of stalk in corn after either treatment, prac- tically no change in case of wheat, but a very marked increase of oat straw in proportion to the grain, an increase somewhat the more pronounced with the lime treatment, but visible with the carbonate treatment also. The crop results justify the statement that the use of lime in the manner adopted for these experiments and under the conditions pre- viously mentioned cause a net decrease rather than a gain in pro- duction; whereas, the carbonate of lime exhibited a slight increase, but entirely insufficient to pay for the cost of the carbonate applied. Partial analyses of the soils of these plots made 18 years after the experiments were begun showed the presence in the soil treated with carbonate of lime, of practically the same amount of organic carbon as in the unfertilized soil, and somewhat less active humus; whereas, the limed plots showed one-eighth less organic carbon and one- tenth less active humus than the unfertilized plots. That is to say, the lime used in excess tended clearly to depress the humus supply 412 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. in the soil. Nevertheless, the rate of decrease was very slow, and where manure was used in moderate quantities with lime the humus content did not diminish. In the case of the nitrogen, likewise, the carbonate plot shows a distinct gain over the unfertilized plots, whereas, the limed plot exhibits a deficiency amounting to one-eighteenth of the entire quan- tity in the unfertilized soil—a decrease readily accounted for when the liberation of ammonia and more rapid destruction of humus in limed soils are considered. When, however, manure was used with lime, the soil showed a very pronounced gain in nitrogen far exceed- ing the proportion of gain in humus in the same plots. That is to say, in the manure, as in the soil, the influence of lime leads to a more rapid destruction of carbonaceous than of nitrogeneous mat- Ler: To conclude, the use of crushed limestone in large quantities ap- plied biennially was slightly advantageous, both as regards crop yield and influence upon the humus and nitrogen supplies of the soil, while the use of corresponding quantities of lime, applied every four years, led to diminished crop yields, other than those of wheat, and to a slight but appreciable diminution of humus and nitrogen in the soils. It is probable that the relative gain in the soil nitro- gen and the crop increase were collectively sufficient in this case to pay the extra cost of the carbonate. Considering, however, the fact that the use of lime in these ex- periments was highly excessive, that the soil had, when the experi- ments began, no particular need for the addition of lime, and that the losses of soil and crop from its use were not very great, it is im- probable that the results above stated would warrant Pennsylvania farmers who are tilling and cropping heavy clays and loams in sub- stituting the more expensive and less perfectly distributable crushed limestone for the much more cheaply and perfectly subdivided, slaked lime used in equivalent, moderate quantities. A Member: Then you do not advocate the free use of lime? DR. FREAR: Not always; but I think the question resolves itself into this: whether the soil contains sufficient lime for the amount of humus that is in it, and the texture. Now, in light soils there is not so much danger in the use of life, but we have very few soils and it is a common experience that we cannot use much lime to advantage. I might refer & isa) NTO NW WOOT: Wire e ase /oraie oloictarainicrnciaiets olaterelstaleys late verecalelelotataiereieterale’eleiale\etetaiat otate{ajnlele/slelstalamstarelelcietr is $223, 800 $188, 700 MUVITIOIS saeco as mates wie wrote. wate ereieistela alntars cloin stele aintalalale;e[oisieial\clele\e(eiaseistsbala/ain\oie en/a/o)e\e\aie\aje\oleleceie 181,000 131,000 TION ce ciaeins eietelelairis sie losntotelela/elovete atetel ovals als[oveimleraiatateteraiet=/+/o1=\eralainin(eleietelstelelarelsie(s\eie(«]o1e1tnimiael~ 150, 725 110, 485 PPEMTISY VATA, | f cisticrsicis cielcistoteisiein sieetcle)stateratelelovniei«intolerelainin)olelalaieve(elalnlelataime) elejeieioi=)sl~iatsieleter= 55,000 20, 000 The activities of an institution may be shown by other ways than the money expended. The employes devoting themselves to agricul- tural education and research are as follows: Oo G ve | oa . 3) 3 2 3 ° a n n Es 5 ah a = ae : g Se cs iS) i (o) & ING Ws eMCODE Gere lavetaialc eiele/aia\elalaisveieva/alolsia/a\e(els|o\ejeleln(ele(eisiel~i='sl-(a]sielsieistololsivio(elainl=in(= 94 63 157 PUTIN OIS SU ecrstorcistaisisinie re neleieis eicieielelererniete cletele oieinievelelsloletels\e[olatnlel=)=inlel=ielels/e[elezeisiew 48 63 111 COLTON ras c release erase wielets elle nie a/otaletale/a/elerelsiaysi=/ejnieleleleteisielere(ctefelelslelalslein eisl0)s\ef=is 35 48 83 WPENUSVIVAMIA, ciieisie.c eile c.21s,cislels v'0)0 6ic/e s\nsisieiniuis'e s/vlei=|x/=|s/e/0\=1s/a\s/e/aiele\sleieies}s 20 23 43 If a person has never had to prepare a budget for the maintenance of a school of agriculture and experiment station, he can hardly real- ize how much money it takes. Having been called upon to prepare such a budget I give you the result of my investigations. The budget submitted by the Dean and Director to the Executive Committee of the Pennsylvania State College for the next two years is as follows: Budget of the School of Agriculture and Experiment Station, The Pennsylvania State College. 1907-8. 1908-9. , 1. Dean and director’s Office, .......... ce cee ee cece eee eee eee tence eee eeenenens $26,020 $26, 020 va, JAPSRON TR n GODDAO EI DOO COOK ODC TO Cn CodU CH OGUOUDorc Sunn sOGbEADOBbSOoEsoc ones: 8,100 8,600 3. Agricultural Chemistry, .22 2.00. cccecsce cesses cnscecncrceseeterscesces 4,200 4,500 4. Agricultural extension and Short COUISES, .......--.eeeee cere ee cece eee: 3,500 3,500 6B. Animal UHUSbandry:, 2 ctosccinsele cists ois ciniciece elniale clelele’nle o.vjeseieleicieivie(evivwle(sjeseinis eis 8, 400 11,900 GIB GLAT Ye ac eeicce nero ieiels aeeie elejesainielola aletale elute ioleaietelatejetel-Pevercista}o\sleleloletelelaloisletateleielale(aie 5, 800 ‘i 7. Correspondence courses and poultry husbandry, Sane ; 13, 080 13, 280 S eDairy ehusbaltdry;secideeceeceeclee se serclectelctelcieisrel= clelelelelals 10, 400 10, 400 9. Experimental agricultural chemistry, ............ Rerate Bac 13,540 14,540 S{TRe Jot) esa che doGuabodddodoauScndaconcon cop ochnadsabosDo dooncadb dodausoToobongoueC 4,500 6, 11. Landscape gardening and floriculture, .........-..seeeeeeeee cee eeeeeeeee 5,400 5,400 12. HRorbiculture, 1 yi iisccieteinls «soiree «)nisiclelal=inle nin> “1s om nlei0 ws n/01=/=\s\s\0)s)0{5)=/0/*19)5\e/s\eiele\s.0=1° 5,300 6,500 13. Zoology and entOMOlOgy, .....0..csccereccewccercecceccrcerscvccecessecccs 2,300 2,500 14, Rural Engimeerin gs, oe cee scence cc cicacicecnclee cs clacisisleas dele sssieicsis aisle sisessisaelisse sevens moles 4,700 ARS ERO eC COMOMMIGH il ra aislcloicleletelel=teletelchats(ayalavelclalaleye/s/alninfoiela(e rele oleatn(alolelniniale\eiescielniefelelatel|trieleleleininieletstoiniay= 9,000 Experiment station, .......c..ceccccceceecccesccteressrsceccrsececceeeeees 15, 000 20,000 Institute of animal nutrition, <...02 eee ce ccc cc cer svcccccesserevessecssers 13, 000 13,000 PTOCEY a ncrercieleietersie eietaraie tata eoterelele tole teieratelaieatetelatatute[aletenntaleTetsfalsleleratel ofaia)ats(elensjasfeieictacs $138,540 $166, 440 Eee ne, No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 421 The question has been raised, and therefore may occur to you, as to the character of the expenditures in the Dean’s and Director’s of- fice. The following table gives an analysis of the budget for this office. SOL EINIGSS (aration GES Rie Oe nee eer ee Ra $8,220 BE VCNSes OL GM LAIOM Farle. a. tle Mrs Coc ake Oe ie aon 3,500 SPU De DL Gc ctl CIT eet eRe ate aon oy eke Ow: «aldo a aene Snake's Pelee 3,500 PUBL C YO SLUOC* CUCL Maria se list sis-s «ose ie ose oie 6 ee abe 1,000 ee here UE Nato iein re pis die ea Riek ow Saw ae 1,000 Be reer ye REPOS: ts octets aos) wiaie's 2x So oe we eS 500 PRUE ete a eae eh Petre ce MM alec Gon is & weak Wd wl wee Hier 1,500 PTI OLMSERWICUS ribet aa oss ogee ne wale eto oies ok Seo bs 1,000 COTE TIDETE TEs Se SI cs Oe en at Sc eee are 1,000 rer MORE LINNEA |r iaverats eon Gye aicke ade due Meco ei we ele Bod 4,800 $26,020 Of this amount, $15,160 will come from Federal funds; $10,860 is asked of the State Legislature. The Experiment Station will receive from the Federal Government $24,000 for the fiscal year 1907-8, and $26,000 for the fiscal year 1908-9, and its estimated annual income from fertilizers is $13,000. Deducting these items from the budget stated above, there will b» required for maintenance about $100,000 for the fiscal year 1907-8, and $125,000 for the fiscal year 1908-9. The Executive Committee has estimated that $100,000 will be re- quired to complete and equip the new agricultural building and com- plete the equipment of the dairy building. A new building is re- quired for forestry, horticulture, zoology, and entomology at a cost of $100,000. Some additional buildings are required for poultry hus- bandry, and two residences are required, one for the Dean and Di- rector and one for the poultryman. The Executive Committee are therefore asking $125,000 for new buildings. If all these require- ments of the School of Agriculture and the Experiment Station are to be provided for by the State Legislature, the appropriation must be as follows: PATCH ANCE LORETO Gots a) Aessncls oh chet 5, chest sales 8-<'s eee Ase e o's $100,000 MMBC ANCE LOR JUS Ont k coke fad diss oe op Wide ee yeas 125,000 Completion and equipment for Agricultural building, .. 100.000 Buildings for Forestry, Horticulture, Zoology, Ento- mology, Eoultry, and two residences, ©... -.....-..+.. 125,000 SR chiteet ment a Nee ce iois oe Lis eyianiay Ore, 5 opas: Sie! ale! wish sce ee oa SOS $450,000 The question now arises as to what would happen to the Penn- sylvania State College if the State Legislature should increase the appropriation for that institution. 422 - ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. Income of the College of Agriculture and Experiment Station in the University of Illinois during ten years: ae ni »~ ~ n S o o > Ls) S) rs st »~ oO n Year. = 5 5 Zui s ui a6 2 : Pe s E § bo bo & ‘sa < USOT Fe vers eis teih teen: sha wlasesa svece sco/sintaca ere ojays ae vated abe srepelerere eth SNe aialoe Malena $22, 000 8 19 POOR SP sa reiets -o: cle sash ath ave svate, dvbro arelolein tay srarapels exeeho ereralave oiecohe fo clones FcR ereieoieeacaiers 22,000 9 25 Ta rete hacta a's a/ata caso ese elaine elnie iri o Ri amnwvete Weraw ele a amb oteT eLearn apace eee Te | 43,000 16 90 LN is Pate! wip ie saieta (wrare tac oasen satel 'asanal alate ase ait o arcibigaier nee eve lal eles ohapateraieie eielaue tle 43, 000 17 159 DRI Re tess = Fesvicratetrcelauatele che ogetevey oye: eleisculateterd cacetete tetera caaltietave ts Mater tereca ejctete otabe ticks 103, 000 | 232 NI se ab st arena niotamiiain oietalabaee aictatovere iiaatermecieilca ta etietnins sleresumerichta noeretaaatl 103, 000 27 284 PSN Gaia ales cx caret ot iclins/ofutece enone ace, vine (evel olor diate atavebetsrs aces wiaietee omaieiovare e\eigiare nce the 190, 000 37 339 Ed ee lots oes a sharn tralaietulatea ls is aisiacatoalata sineintere etn erate ar mien sleet ein nimemeeee 190,000 37 406 SL PTI os to ataya Gis ra vateus oe ops iaseratous ayoye at Parevarer sta siatot\ Vel siavcnevacetesatalave, siefa\etstole(e mat oTstae 201,000 44 | 430 DUNG bret ark sie oitin)o/or sValoton cielo akstajerere tele sVe oistay elevate) cteye/nisicvaseleineiciaterciete ctevsie sistant ate | 201, 000 48 450 It is evident irom this table that the amount of money and the number of teachers have something to do with the number of students. The Pennsylvania State College is not merely an Agricultural School and an Agricultural Experiment Station. It is, in fact, a State University, since it is a collection of schools, the most impor- tant of which in point of development and number of students is the Engineering School. Probably three-fourths of all the students at tending State College are in the Engineering School, which takes high rank among the Engineering Schools of the country. I, myself, am interested cspecially in the School of Agriculture and the Ex- periment Station, since I am to be charged with the responsibility of their development. I, however, recognize the very simple math- ematical proposition that the whole is greater than any of its parts. - I am also a firm believer in the proposition that the place to eda. cate a boy or girl is where there are a number of strong schools. I do not believe in the monastery or the convent or the single course college for the education for the world’s work. I happen to know that there are a number of people who are afraid that the promotion of agriculture may prevent the proper development of other schools at State College. I am glad of the opportunity to say before official representatives of the farmers. of Pennsylvania that I expect to see the other schools of State College promoted and supported by the farmers of the State just as cordially as the School of Agriculture. The School of Agriculture may grow without preventing the growth of a State institution. This may be illastrated by the University of Illinois, the growth of whose College of Agriculture I have just shown you in this table. The fol- lowing table gives the total income and the total uumber of stu- dents in the University of Illinois: No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 423 3 gs E E : 3 A n Bape eee er ee ee a nance Rd sno avdieradeo as canes SPbesuaiacs $212, 000 1,582 pe eee as MRI Gores hadawasiascnsianiones adeck tase 212, 000 1,824 eae See RE PCE se oe aca oda nahenoh «nob dcvebaneutdors ctite saab 330, 400 2,234 LTT, (Uonne cs sanbet lac eens Bee Conca Sa ln ea PE 330, 400 2,505, ae et ee NTE cictaccladcia steers chenarinoete canes 430, 330 3, 932 a Pea eee Res MEN See Goo ocala saccinncions oa sncdsdeaesene ine 430, 330 3, 289 eae ee teen laces eanad UNeness cancadeteuaeceuccnicns 613, 000 3,594 ae meen ee coe ccs ate dave cen ca stn vadeduenare souns 613, 000 3,729 DL 27) Depo Besccocacaee dasa hae Sebo jaye eee i gen ne 787,035 4,074 act ne name MORES AMC SI if cr acc vcnoessovee code ae con 787,035 4,374 I have tried to show in the figures which I placed before you that this beautiful and flourishing State of Pennsylvania, while less of an agricultural state relative to its other industries than some others, is absolutely one of the first eight or nine agricultural states of the Union. That in gross returns for an acre of land actually tilled, its farmers lead some of the more important states. That your farmers need aid through agricultural education and research and through the executive and police powers exercised by your State Department of Agriculture does not admit of debate. While your resources are boundless, it is obvious that what you are doing to promote this great basic industry falls far short of what other states have seen fit to do. If I were speaking to a body of men who had no interest in agriculture, I might appeal to them from the standpoint of their civic pride, but before this society, officially recognized as the society which is organized to promote in every way within its power the calling of agriculture, may I not appeal to your business sagacity? Need I point out that in spending money in the promotion of agri- culture, the Commonwealth is merely advancing money which will be returned to it manifold in future years? MR. HALL: I think that the Board should express its apprecia- tion of this paper by a rising vote of thanks. MR. CLARK: The committee in charge of the “Dog Law” is pre- pared to report at any time you may wish. The CHAIRMAN: We will be ready to listen to that report. MR. CLARK: At any time you are prepared. The CHAIRMAN: Right now. The Committee on “Dog Law” thereupon made the following re- port: REPORT OF COMMITTEE WITH REFERENCE TO DOG LEGIS- LATION: First, we realize the dog is here to stay, and to gain control of this animal we would recommend the following means of accomplishing this end. First, that all dogs be registered and to wear a collar or tag bearing the number of said registry. ° i 424 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. Second, to accomplish the registry, we would recommend that the first registry shail be made by the assessor when he makes his fall assessment by registering all dogs, to take a short description of the animal and issue tag or collar with number, after the owner has paid the fee of $2.00 for each dog so registered, which shall be paid to the assessor at that time or the tag refused, and after the time cf the assessor making his ‘returns, it will be the duty of the con- stable to destroy all dogs not registered, and be paid for this duty $2.00 and mileage for each dog killed and buried, and when making his reports to the Court, he shall also state that he has complied with the instructions of the Dog Law in killing all dogs not registered. Third, as to the disposition of this tax, we recommend that this shall be left iu the hands of the commissioners of each county as to what it shall be applied to. All laws that would interfere in the carrying out legislation of this kind shall he repealed. M. N. CLARK, S. S. BLYHOLDER, N. B. CRIT?CHFIELD. The CHAIRMAN: What shall be done with this report? On motion, duly seconded, the same was received and adopted. MR. NORTON: Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: If you are ready to adjourn, we will be ready to start the milking machine at half past eleven. We will operate it again from four to half past four this afternoon, and from ten to half past ten this evening. Now, we will probably be crowded for space, and if you can’t all get there at this time, we will be glad to see you there later. The SECRETARY: The election of officers was to take place at this time, but it is for the Board to decide whether they want to postpone it, or proceed with the election now. On motion, duly seconded, it was agreed to proceed with the elec- tion of officers at once. The CHAIRMAN: Before proceeding with the election of offi- cers, we should dispose of Prof. Hunt’s paper. I should like to hear a motion in regard to it. MR. HERR: I move that the paper be received and published with the proceedings of the Board. This motion was duly seconded and agreed to. The CHAIRMAN: We will now proceed with the election of off- cers. I shall be pleased to receive nominations. The first in order, I believe, is nominations for vice presidents. MR. SCHWARZ: I nominate Mr, Fenstermaker. MR. McHENRY: I wish to place in nomination the name of one of our oldest members, Joel A. Herr, A Member: I nominate Mr. M. N. Clark. MR. CLARK: I think you had better take my name off the list. I may not be able to serve, and therefore ask to withdraw my name. . INOP: i: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 425 A Member: I offer the name of Mr. E. E. Chubbuck. MR. BARNES: I wish to nominate Geo. G. Hutchison, MR. HERR: I nominate Mr. McClellan. MR. FENSTERMAKER: If the Board will allow me, Mr. Schwarz has kindly mentioned my name, but I have had the honor once, and I will be glad to withdraw. MR. SCHWARZ: I did that because I thought, since the meet- ing is to be held at Allentown, we should have a vice president from there. MR. FENSTERMAKER: Not necessarily. I appreciate the mo- tive, but if the Board will allow, I beg to withdraw my name. MR. SCHWARZ: Inasmuch as we now have three names, I mors that they be elected by acclamation. Duly seconded and agreed to. The Secretary was directed to cast the ballot for Messrs. Herr, Chubbuck, and McClellan as Vice Presidents. The CHAIRMAN: Will the first Vice President please take the Chair. © MR. HERR: I don’t think he begins to serve until the next meeting. The CHAIRMAN: I think it is customary for him tu take the Chair as soon as elected. Mr. Herr thereupon took the Chair and said: “I have always taken a deep interest in the Board and I appreciate the honor you have conferred upon me. We are now ready for nominations for the Executive Committee, on which there are nine members.” The following gentlemen were nominated to serve on the Exe- cutive Committee: Messrs. Snavely, Blyholder, I. A. Eschbach, Stout, Clark, Naginey, McGowan, Seamans. MR. SCHWARZ: I move that the nominations close and we elect these gentlemen by acclamation. Duly seconded and agreed to. The SECRETARY: I take pleasure in casting the ballot for the election of these gentlemen. MR. KAHLER: I would like to make this announcement: That the members of the Legislative Committee are requested to meet in the little room back there at half past one o’clock. If there is anything to come before the committee I would like to know it before that. MR. HALL: As a member of the Board, I am not willing that the information we have received from Prof. Hunt this morning should go with so meager a recognition. It seems to me that his paper 28 426 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. gives us the information we needed regarding the status of this State, and I move you, sir, that a vote of thanks be extended to him and that the entire amount asked for be endorsed by this Board of Agriculture. MR. BLYHOLDER: I think we should divide up that question. I don’t think we can legally vote on the two things at the same time. The CHAIRMAN: We will take a vote on the first part, to ex- tend a vote of thanks to Prof. Hunt. Agreed to. MR. YOUNG: I think the easiest way to bring this information before the Legislature is for Prof. Hunt to go there and deliver this lecture. The SECRETARY: Do you make a motion that Prof. Hunt be re- quested to go before the Legislature and deliver that lecture? MR. YOUNG: I do. The SECRETARY: I think the best way would be for him to go before the Appropriation Committee of both the House and the Senate, and then the members can come in and listen to it. I am afraid he would have trouble in getting a hearing right in the House. MR. HALL: I don’t want to take up all the time, but there is one practical thing all of us can do: We can go home and see the mem- bers who represent our county, and urge upon them to stand up for this appropriation, and in that way we can help the thing along. The CHAIRMAN: That is a very good idea. MR. NAGINEY: I would suggest that we see our county repre- sentatives before we go home. They are all here now and can easily be reached. I think if will be better for us to see them before the Professor delivers his lecture. The CHAIRMAN: And if you can’t do that, you all know how to write. On motion, duly seconded, adjourned until 1.30 P. M. Wednesday, January 23, 1907, 1.30 P. M. The Convention opened this afternoon with Mr. Herr in the Chair, — The CHAIRMAN: Is the Executive Committee ready to make a report? MR. STOUT: As one of the Committee, I can make a report if desired. The CHAIRMAN: Mr. Stout, a member of the Executive Com- mittee, will make the report. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 427 REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. MR. STOUT: The Executive Committee have named the follow- ing Committees; you will notice that there are a few slight changes from the committees as they now stand. (See pages 7 and 8.) The CHAIRMAN: The program now calls for the Report of the Committee on Floriculture, Edwin Lonsdale, Chairman. I do not see Mr. Lonsdale here. Have you his report, Mr. Secretary? The SECRETARY: Mr. Lonsdale asked permission to send in his report a little later, and have it printed with the proceedings. What is the pleasure of the Board in regard to that? The CHAIRMAN: What shall be done regarding Mr. Lonsdale’s report? On motion, duly seconded, it was agreed to receive the report and place it on file for publication with the proceedings of the mecting. The CHAIRMAN: Next comes the Report of the Committee on Forestry. Is ‘Mr. Piatt here? It appeared that neither Mr. Piatt nor his report were there. The CHAIRMAN: We will then go on to the next paper, the Report of the Committee on Cereals and Cereal Crops, by S. X. McClellan, Chairman. Mr. ‘McClellan then read his report, as follows: REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON CEREALS AND CEREAL CROPS. By MR, 8S. X. MCCLELLAN, Chairman. This is a subject that is worthy of more consideration than is gen- erally given to it, as it is of vast importance to all classes of people, as the production of cereal crops is by far the greatest industry of the present day. It requires more brain, muscle and money than any other one branch of business, because it is the motive power of the nation. The corn crop for 1906 in itself will show the vast amount of revenue it produces, and that is only a part of the great industry. The total number of acres of corn in the United States for the year 1906 was 96,737,581, and the average yield per acre was 30.3 bushels, making 2,927,416,091 bushels. The average price per bushel 39.9 cents, making in all $1,166,626,479. Winter Wheat came next in value. The total acreage for 1906 was 25,599,961, and the average yield per acre was 16.7 bushels, making the total number of bushels 492,888,004. The average price per bushel was 68.3, making a total value of $336,485,081. Of Spring Wheat there was 17,705,868 acres; average bushels per acre 13.7, making a total of 242,372,966; and the average price per bushel 634 cents, making a total of $153,897,679. 428 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. The Oats crop of 30,958,768 acres, with an average yield of 294 bushels per acre, making a total of 964,904,522 bushels, at an aver- age price of 31.7 cents per bushel; total value of same being $306,- 292,978 for oats alone. ° Next comes Barley, there being 6,323,757 acres at an average yield of 28.3 bushels per acre, making a total of 178,916,484 bushels, at an average of 415 cents per bushel, making $74,235,979 for that crop. The next crop in value comes Rye. Now, I do not think they base their estimate on this crop from what it costs the consumer when made into whiskey and sold at from 10 cents to 15 cents per glass—and if you notice, the glasses are not as large either—but we find the total acreage to be 2,001,904 acres, making an average of 16.7 bushels per acre, which makes 33,374,833 bushels at an average of almost 60 cents per bushel, making $19,671,248 for rye alone. Buckwheat, considered by a large number of farmers as not a profitable crop, shows up an acreage of 789,208 acres—average bushels per acre 13.6, making a total of 14,641,737 bushels, valued at 59.6 per bushel, making $8,727,443 worth of buckwheat. Of Flaxseed there were 2,505,927 acres, making an average of 10 1-5 bushels per acre, or a total of 25,576,146 bushels, at an average of $1.012 per bushel, making a sum equal to $25,899,165. And the Rice crop shows an acreage of 575,014 acres, at an average of 31.1 bushels, making 17,854,768 bushels, at an average of 90.2 cents per bushel, making the sum of $16,121,298. The state that shows the largest acreage of corn is Illinois, 9,616,886 acres. The state showing the lowest number of acres is Wyoming, 2,528 acres. Ohio ranks first in number of bushels per acre, 42.6, and good old Pennsylvania third. Florida, the lowest, with 11 bushels per acre. Iowa produced the greatest number of bushels, 373,275,000, and Wyoming the lowest, 68,256 bushels. Ari- zona, the highest price per bushel, 85 cents. Oklahoma, the lowest, which was 30 cents per bushel. Illinois ranks first in the value of the corn crop, being a total of $124,981,051, and Wyoming the low- est, $40,271. Kansas leads in acreage of winter wheat, with 5,131, 800 acres, and Alabama the lowest, with 1,761 acres. Idaho leads in the number of bushels per acre, which is 25.4, and North Caro- lina lowest, with 9.1 bushels per acre. Kansas leads in the total number of bushels, having 78,516,540, and Mississippi the lowest, with only 17,610 bushels. South Carolina shows the highest aver- age price per bushel, with $1.10, and Oklahoma the lowest, 55 cents per bushel. In Spring Wheat growing states, North Dakota leads in acres, with 5,992,000, and Arizona lowest, with only 15,542 acres. Colo- rado has the greatest number of bushels per acre, 324, and Minne- sota the lowest, being 10.9 per acre. North Dakota leads in the total number of bushels. having 77,896,000, Arizona lowest, with 391,- 658 bushels, and she also leads with the highest average price per bushel, being $1.03, and Nebraska the lowest, at 57 cents per bushel. North Dakota leads in the total amount of dollars, with $49,074,480, and Arizona lowest, with $403,408 to her credit. Oats is produced in every State and Territory of the United States. Iowa leads in the number of acres sown, with 4,165,000 acres, and Arizona lowest with only 914 acres. Utah leads in aver. age of bushels to the acre, being 43.7 per acre, and Florida the low- No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 429 est, with 14 bushels, per acre. Iowa produced the greatest number of bushels, having 140,777,000, and Arizona the lowest, with 31,442 bushels. Florida had the highest average price per bushel, being 68 cents, and South Dakota the lowest, with 25 cents per bushel. Iowa leads in total amount of dollars, being $38,009,790 to her credit. In the Barley growing States and Territories California leads in number of acres, with 1,425,000 acres, and New Mexico the lowest, with 556 acres. Utah leads with the highest number of bushels per acre, being 44 bushels, and New Hampshire the low- est, with 21.4 per acre. California leads in the total number of bushels, with 38,760,000, and New Mexico the lowest, with 15,072 bushels. Arizona shows the highest average price per bushel, being 76 cents, and Nebraska the lowest, with 31 cents per bushel. Cal- ifornia leads in dollars, having $20,930,400 to her credit, and New Mexico the lowest, having $9,458. All but ten of the States and Territories produce rye, Michigan having 400,000 acres, leads, and Wyoming only 428 acres. Idaho has the best average per acre, being 25 1-5 bushels. Georgia, the lowest, having only 8.2 bushels per acre. Pennsylvania leads in total number of bushels, having 6,025,011 bushels to her credit, and Wyoming the lowest, with only 8,132 bushels. South Carolina hay- ing the highest average price per bushel, being $1.25, and Nebraska the lowest, with only 44 cents per bushel. In total value of crops Pennsylvania leads, having to her credit $3,856,007, and Wyoming the lowest, having $5,855 to her credit. Buckwheat is grown in only twenty-four or twenty-five states. New York leads with 321.552 acres, and Tennessee lowest, with 527 acres. Maine has the highest average bushels per acre, being 28 bushels, and Iowa the lowest, with 12 bushels. New York has the greatest number of bushels, 6,109,488, and Tennessee the lowest, having 8,482 bushels. Tennessee also has the highest average price per bushel, being 83 cents, and Minnesota the lowest, at 54 cents per bushel. New York leads in dollars, having $3,726,788 to her credit, and Nebraska the lowest, having $8,007. Flax is raised in thirteen to fifteen states. North Dakota leads, with 1,465,745 acres, and California lowest, with 1,042 acres. Wis- sonsin has the highest average yield of seed per acre, being 14 bushels, and Missouri lowest, with 7.3 per acre. North Dakota leads with total of 14,510,876 bushels, and California lowest, with 12,504 bushels; California and Oregon having the highest average price per bushel, $1,25, and Idaho the lowest, with 85 cents per bushel. North Dakota leads the list with the value of $14,801,094, and Cali- fornia the lowest, with $15,630. About nine states grow rice. Louisiana leads the list, with 308,377 acres, and North Carolina the lowest, with 668 acres. Texas gave the largest yield of rough rice per acre, which is 36 bushels, and Mississippi the lowest, with 20 bushels per acre. Louisiana has the greatest number of bushels, 8,634,556, and North Carolina the lowest, with 19,305 bushels. South Carolina, Florida and Alabama have the same average price of $1.00 per bushel, and Arkansas the lowest, at 85 cents per bushel. Louis- jana has the largest total value, being $7,771,100, and North Car- olina the lowest, with $18,340. Taking the total value of these crops they are immense, making a grand total of $2,107,906,860. 430 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. The CHAIRMAN: What shall be done with this report? On motion, duly seconded, it was received and filed for publication. The CHAIRMAN: Some of the reports have been omitted. The first of these is the report of Dr. Leonard Pearson, State Veter- narian, who is now with us, and wiil read his report. Dr. Pearson’s report is as follows: REPORT OF THE VETERINARIAN. Dk. LEONARD PEARSON, Harrisburg, Pa. The subject of tuberculosis continues to be one of chief interest in connection with the veterinary work of the State. It is a little embarassing, sometimes, to speak on this rather threadbare theme to this body, that has in recent years heard so much about it. But, so long as there is such need for information in respect to this dis- ease, and I find evidence of it in my daily work, I am sure that you will not resent a brief discussion of it. While the general topic of tuberculosis is an old one, a vast number of men are making in- vestigations in relation to its occurrence in man and animals, and so, from time to time, new facts concerning its nature and new developments in means to combat it are being brought to light. I take it that the plan of operation of the State Livestock Sani- tary Board is known to you, and it has been described in the annual reports of the Department of Agricuiture. You are aware that in- spections and tuberculin tests of herds are made only upon request of owners of cattle. It has been the opinion of the Board that there is no permanent advantage to the State in completely freeing herds of tuberculosis, by the use of the tuberculin test, and in undertaking a large share of the cost of such operations, if the herds are permitted soon to become reinfected. And it is quite im- possible, excepting at enormous expense—by the use of much more money than is at all likely to be made available for this purpose— to keep herds free from infection unless the public authorities have the co-operation—the active assistance—of the owner. Hence, such inspections are made only upon application from herd owners. But, under a new law (No. 56, P. L., 1905), it has become possible to deal with all cases of advanced tuberculosis of cattle that are reported. Still, there is no organization for searching for such particularly dangerous animals, and I regard this the point that next requires consideration. While we have found that the majority of farmers are alert to the importance of excluding tuberculosis cattle from their herds, and many report tuberculosis when examination shows that this disease does not exist, there are others who are so careless as to keep and use cows with advanced tuberculosis, even with tubercu- lous udders, and permit such cows to scatter germs of disease for meonths, until their entire herds become infected—to say nothing of poisoning the milk supply. Tuberculous cows are dangerous in proportion to the number of tubercle bacilli that are escaping from their bodies. Advanced No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 431 cases of disease excrete infinitely more germs than light cases, hence the advanced cases constitute the greatest menace to the live stock industry and the public health. For the purpose of discover- ing and extirpating these particularly dangerous animals, a sys- tematic inspection of dairy herds is necessary. I have been loth to recommend such an inspection, because I know how unpopular the idea of inspection is. It should be remembered, however, that it is not fair to the careful, clean dairyman to have to compete in the market with a man who has no pride in his work, or regard for the quality or wholesomeness of his product. And it is unfair to permit the worst managed herds to reach such a degraded state as to cast reflection on the whole milk supply. I feel that unbiased consider- ation of this suggestion must lead to the conclusion that objections to it are based chiefiy on sentimental grounds. Remember that it is not proposed to use the tuberculin test in connection with this inspection, unless it should be necessary to do so to remove doubt in relation to the condition of individual animals. To propose to test all herds with tuberculin would be absurd, and such a suggestion could not be made by any one who knows what he is talking about. If such an inspection is provided for, the inspectors should, and no doubt would, feel that they are selected to aid, and not to oppress; to assist, and not to hamper; to co-operate, and not to op- pose. It would—and I speak advisedly, and from long experience— be in the rarest case that the inspector would have to make the least show of authority. Such inspectors would be of great value to dairymen as peripatetic advisors in relation to the control of other diseases of importance, as abortion, calf cholera, infectious gargets, etc., and in relation to general questions of animal, stable and milk hygiene. In New York State, there are a dozen or more dairy inspectors appointed by the city of New York, and a project is being consid- ered to increase this corps to nearly one hundred. Such inspectors, appointed and paid by a city, have in mind, first and foremost, the interests of the city. The farmer is not helped by such men—unless most incidentally—and, indeed, one could scarecly expect appointees of Tammany Hall to be able to render much help to farmers, if they would. If there is to be such an inspection, it should not be conducted by the cities, but by a department of the State government that is affiliated with the agricultural interests of the State, so that it will be with, and not against, the best agricultural sentiment. But, of course, the organization must be of such character that it will meet the very proper and growing sentiment in cities for a purer and more wholesome milk supply. There are numerous other subjects that I might report to you, but I esteem this to be one of such importance that I wish not to obscure it by other topics. Moreover, I wish to be brief now, because I am on the program for another paper at another session. I hope this subject will receive careful consideration at the hands of this representative body. A Member: Has there been any attempt made to vaccinate calves? 432 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. DR. PEARSON: The vaccination of calves in our experiment work has been very successful. We are now practicing it very freely on quite a number of farm herds throughout the State. A Member: Is it a protection? DR. PEARSON: I think it is a protection for the time, but for just how long I do not know. A German authority has stated that the protection is for life; I criticised it, and was severely criticised myself for it; I said it was ridiculous to claim that it protected for life when it had only been tried for a few years. And French tests show that the immunity expires after a certain time, and then the animal is liable to contract the disease. They have found by their experiments that the animal is usually protected for about three years. They have proven this by putting the vaccinated animals in among a herd in which there are some advanced cases of tuber- culosis, and noting results, and animals that have been vaccinated for more than that length of time, and which are exposed, show decided lesions of tuberculosis. I find, however, that animals should be re-vaccinated after a period of two years. I look upon the whole treatment as exceedingly interesting and instructive, and of great importance to the farmer. MR. VAN ALSTYNE: I would like to ask the Doctor how expensive it would be to the farmer? DR. PEARSON: All the herds that are now being vaccinated are treated at the expense of the State. MR. VAN ALSTYNE: Exactly what will be the cost to the farmer where the State does not pay for it? DR. PEARSON: Well, if the Live Stock Board continues to con- duct the work it will not be more expensive in the future than it is now; I do not know whether this will be done, but I think it ought to be. MR. VAN ALSTYNE: But what will it cost the farmer now? DR. PEARSON: It does not cost anything; the State does it for you. MR. VAN ALSTYNE: Exactly; but if the State did not do it, what would it cost the farmer? DR. PEARSON: I do not know what the veterinary surgeon would charge for doing the work, but that would be the chief cost. The CHAIRMAN: Are there any further questions to ask the Veterinarian? If not, what disposition shall be made of his report? It was regularly moved and seconded that the report be received and placed on file. Agreed to. The CHAIRMAN: As Chairman of the Committee on Credentials, I would say that the Lancaster Agricultural Society has elected Hon. W. H. Brosius a member of the Board for the next three years, and I would move that he be elected a member of the Board. Duly seconded, and agreed to. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 433 The CHAIRMAN: Next we will listen to the report of the Commit- tee on Roads and Road Laws. Mr. Kuppenburg, Chairman of this Committee, then read the fol- lowing report: REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON ROADS AND ROAD LAWS. By Mr. D. A. KNUPPENBURG, Chairman. Of the many questions which confront the people of Pennsylvania today, that of road building is of vital importance. The construc- tion of roads is governed by law, hence the necessity of wise road laws. Our present system of pathmaster and nonpaid supervisor has not been in use long enough to warrant a just judgment of its merits. It has been demonstrated, however, that supervisors enter upon their duties with little enthusiasm and marked show of dis- interest. It would seem to your Committee that the first requisite in mak- ing and maintaining a good road, would be the location of the roads with proper grades, given by a competent surveyor. Then a law to insure the road being built to the grade given; it too often hap- pens that where a road is properly graded by a surveyor, the road is opened in the cheapest and most unsatisfactory manner, going over steep knolis, or down steep grades, to avoid a little extra expense in keeping the grade. Many country roads should be relaid; taken from bleak hilltops and kept on an easy grade. This, in nearly every case, is possible. Ié this were done, and the law directing the moving of stone closely observed, our highways would be in much better condition, and would well serve the public until better roads come for our use and the use of the next generation. The government will look more carefully to the enforcement of the laws regarding the roads over which the rural free delivery is established. The present requirement is: “Roads traversed by mail carriers shall be kept in good condition and unobstructed. Bridges must be kept over creeks and streams not fordable at any season of the year.” The government has decided that unless roads trav- elled by the carriers are properly maintained, the service will be withdrawn. The Postoffice Department now calls on the carriers for reports on the roads where the highway in question is bad. The 25,973 rural delivery carriers now employed cover 863,363 miles daily, and it is unreasonable to expect them to contend with neglect- ed roads. The inland country roads are primary factors in the commerce of the nation. They are to the city man, the farmer, the lumberman, what the railroad, the rivers and the high seas are to the manufac- turer and the coal operator. The growth of the country has been marvellous, and we are now approaching a new era. The time has come when the country road should be made to compare with the part it plays in the nation’s progress. As a business proposition we would regard it as advantageous to nearly every township to get 28—T—1906. 434 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. a good macadam road at one-eighth the cost of construction. How- ever, if the township or county is not able to meet the expenditure without borrowing, I question the feasibility of issuing bonds for that purpose. Even though our posterity would reap benefit from such permanent improvements and would not object to sharing the cast, I should much prefer using the means within reach, rather than encumber posterity. A change in the Act, putting the entire cost of macadam roads on the State, leaving the townships and counties free to use their means for the improvement of roads, not within reach of the State appropriation, would thus benefit those who would receive slight benefit from the macadam road. If the right policy prevails, this will be done and as much money will be available from these sources as can well be expended for the purpose from year to year. kx- perience shows that there is a limit to State aid, requested, and this will doubtless be the case as long as the counties and townships are requested to pay part of the cost, as small as that cost is. The sentiment in favor of improvement has been greatly strength- ened within the past three or four years. It almost amounts to a general demand, and while we cannot have $50,000,000 (as in the case of New York State) for immediate use, the appropriation can safely, and should, be increased many millions a year. State High- way Commissioner Hunter has commenced a general survey of all the roads in Pennsylvania, for the purpose of compiling a new map, showing their length and location. As there are 99,041 miles of road in the State, it will require several years to complete the survey. According to the best authority at hand, we have 97,904 miles mtd road, and 1,101 miles of toll road, 2,267 miles of macadam road completed, 162 miles contracted. Only one county in the State that has not applied for State aid, that of Juniata. Every other county in the State hag made appliaction for its portion of the road fund, as well as its share of the $125,000 set aside for its maintenance. Allegheny and several other counties which asked for funds last year failed to secure their share by neglect of the County Commissioners to apply within the time limit. Applications on file for State aid in building roads represent 2,267 miles, and of these Commissioner Hunter expects to build 200 miles this year, in addition to the 200 miles already constructed or under way. It has been decided to use part of the automobile license receipts for road building. The fund already amounts to $24,000, and is expected to reach $30,000 each year. The annual license fee is $3.00. Too much cannot be said in regard to using wide tired road wagons for hauling heavy loads. The wide tire acts as a roller on dirt roads, and entitles the user to one-fourth his road tax, not exceeding $20.00. To build a satisfactory earth road, if loose earth is dumped in the middle of the road and consolidated by traffic, the action of narrow tired wheels rolls it into uneven ruts and ridges, which hold water, and ultimately results, if in the winter season, in a sticky, muddy surface, or if it be in the dry season, in covering the surface with several inches of dust. If, however, the surface is prepared with a road machine and properly rolled with a heavy roller, it can usually No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 435 be made sufficiently firm and smooth to sustain the traffic without rutting, and resist the penetrating action of the water. Every road is made smoother, harder, and better by rolling. Such rolling should be done in damp weather, or if that is not possible, the surface should be sprinkled if the soil requires such aid for its proper consolidation. We recommend a steam road roller of sufficient size to be used for rolling the road and crushing stone. If this is not available, then a heavy road roller to be drawn by horses should be used. Also that a change be made in our present appropriation law for good roads, giving all the counties in Pennsylvania an equal right to share the benefits of the appropriation without expense to the county, thereby assisting those most in need of help. A law providing for the payment of Two Dollars per day to Town- ship Supervisors for a sufficient time to properly transact the neces- sary road business, would prove of benefit. We fail to find in our present road laws anything to compel a pathmaster to make a de- tailed report to the supervisor, and therefore recommend that the law make this duty compulsory. The CHAIRMAN: Gentlemen, you have heard the Report of the Committee on Roads and Road Laws. Are there any questions that you wish to ask on that report? If not, what action will you take on it? On motion, duly seconded, it was agreed that this report be re- ceived and placed on file. The CHAIRMAN: We will now have the report of Prof. Surface on Entomology. This report is as follows: REPORT OF THE ENTOMOLOGIST. By PRoF. H. A. SURFACE, Economic Zoologist, Harrisburg, Pa. Never in the history of Pennsylvania has there been so much interest taken in insects as during the past year. The reasons for this are as follows: 1. The destructive effects of insect pests have never before been more apparent in wiping out of existence many orchards, and causing very great loss to farmers, fruit growers, and also truckers and gardeners in this State. 2. The very grave results of the accidental introduction of the Gypsy Moth and the Brown Tail Moth in Massachusetts, and the spreading of these pests into other states hag called the atten- tion of the people, as never before, to the importance of insect pre- vention, and we hope to be able to keep such pests out of this State by proper and careful methods. This problem is so great in Massa- chusetts that the amount of $300,000 was appropriated for fighting these two pests alone, and $30,000 additional for the study and in- troduction of parasites. They have now escaped into New Hamp- shire, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, and are very liable to reach this State. They practically destroy every green 436 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. thing, and are so much worse than the San José Scale that there is but little comparison to be drawn between them. 3. Within the Keystone State the San Jose Scale has destroyed hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of trees and shrubs, as well as tens of thousands of dollars worth of fruits, directly, during the past year. 4. To prevent this loss, special provision was made by the Legis- lature two years ago, and about thirty inspectors and demonstrators have been appointed to work (part of the time during the last four- teen months) under the Division of Zoology of the Department of Agriculture, to ascertain the presence of this destructive pest, and te notify persons whose trees may be infested with it, and who may not know it; also to show them how to control it. 5. The Bulletins of the Division of Zoology have been issued as regularly as possible, bearing almost wholly on insects or their enemies, and have reached at least 50,000 readers each month. 6. The correspondence from the office of the Economic Zoologist has been very great, amounting to at least 500 letters per month; of these at least 75 per cent. are directly upon the subject of insects and other plant pests. 7. The agricultural papers and newspapers of the State are aid- ing in taking up the warfare against such pests, in disseminat- ing the methods of their control. 8. The more advanced agriculturists and horticulturists are buy- ing and using spraying machinery, and more spraying has been done in this State during the past year than in all previous years combined. Their results are satisfactory, generally, and this en- courages them and others to proceed with methods which will save their trees and other plants. %. The manufacturers of spraying apparatus and commercial in- secticides are taking advantage of the needs of the day in sending considerable literature to the farmers and fruit growers over the State, and this aids in calling attention to the importance of insec. ticidal work. 10. The high price of fruits and the certainty of controlling such pests as the Scale insects have combined to induce persons to plant young orchards, and nurserymen tell us that during the past year they have had unusual sales of fruit trees for starting orchards in this State. These influences have combined to eall the attention of the public to the insect pests and the possibility of controlling them in a satisfactory, effective and cheap manner, and producing first-class fruits even though a few pests be present. We believe it possible to obtain a fair view of the subject of in- sects in Pennsylvania during the past year by ruuning through the list of specimens received in the office of the Economic Zoologist. Over 5,000 different collections have been made or received, and all of these have been classified and studied. We find the San José Scale to be, of course, the chief insect sent us, and the one of which most inquiry has been made. In the bulletins of the State Zoolo- gist for February, July, November, and December, of 1906, special attention has been given to the San José Seale and its remedies, and from the experiments there outlined, as well as from written reports from practical fruit growers in many portions of the State, No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 437 it is shown that the best and cheapest remedy for this pest is the boiled lime-sulphur wash, which should be boiled at least one hour. These experiments show that the addition of salt has not been neces- sary, and even some injurious results may come to twigs and buds of peach trees when applied during the fall or winter, with the salt added. Since these bulletins are for free distribution, it is not necessary to dwell at length upon this subject. However, it should be added that the tests of the commercial insecticides have been made with practically the same results that have been obtained in other states, viz: that some of these materials are effective in kill- ing the scale when applied strong enough to have the desired effect, but they should be stronger than claimed by manufacturers and agents, or (for two or three of the leading brands) one part to ten, or at most fifteen parts of water, instead of one to twenty, as claimed by the manufacturers and agents. To avoid the appearance of personal interest in this regard, we advise each person to try a little of such material for himself, and thus, by practical experience, learn the results on his own trees, but to depend upon the cheaper standard or home-made remedies for saving most of his trees until he is well satisfied that he can con- trol the scale in a satisfactory and inexpensive manner by the use of the so-called miscible oils or soluble oils or other commercial in- secticides. In this connection it should be said that the whale-oil soap, two pounds in one gallon of water, applied as a spray or thorough wash in the spring before the buds burst, will have excellent results in killing all pests en the trees, but will not be found as cheap as the lime-sulphur wash, and the latter is also a germicide and fungicide as well as insecticide. The great objection to the lime-sulphur wash is the trouble with clogging nozzles, which can be overcome by straining through a conical wire strainer set in a funnel, as shown by the funnel here exhibited. Unfortunately, it appears that the San José Scale is here to stay, and cannot be exterminated, yet it can be controlled, and encourage- ment should be found in the experience of hundreds of persons whose names and addresses we can give, who are satisfied with the results of their spraying. We believe it very important that a study of the enemies of these pests should be made, and, if possible, to develop or propagate parasites. The attempt will be worth a great deal to the agricultural interests of this State. To aid in disseminating practical information concerning scale insects, we have prepared some models showing such pests greatly enlarged, in natural colors and forms, which are used in meetings where these subjects are discussed. I exhibit them here: Oyster-shell Scale—The Oyster-shell Scale stands next in regard to numbers of specimens sent to the office of the Zoologist and in- quiries made. This is quite different from the San José Scale ag shown by these models, but it is too often confused with it by per- sens who know neither. Our experiments have shown that it is killed by early spraying, using the lime-sulphur wash before the buds burst, just as for the San José Scale. Practical results have been obtained in this way for this pest by our experiments, as well as by fruit growers, such as Hon. H. E. Little, Tunkhannock, Pa., and Mr. Van Busick, of Erie county, who reported this to us. 433 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. Scurfy Scale—The Scurfy Scale stands next in the attention given these pests of fruit growers, and is often mistaken for the more serious San José. However, it is easily distinguished accord- ing to the specimens shown, and is controlled or exterminated by many of the good remedies for the San José. Lecanium.—The fourth common scale insect in this State is the Lecanium, also called Soft Scale and Turtle-shell Scale. In some parts of the State it is very destructive to peach and plum, while another species has commonly been reported upon the magnolia and tulip trees. Among insects which have attracted the attention of the growers of plants, are various kinds of Aphids or plant lice, which have a host of enemies holding them in check, and which are to be destroyed by comparatively mild contact insecticides, such as whale-oil soap, one pound in six gallons of water, or soft soap, or common laundry soap, one pound in about three gallons of water. The Woolly Aphis belongs to the same family as the Green Aphis and Brown Aphis. It works on the roots of plants as well as on the branches, especially where the bark of either root or branch has been injured. On the roots use tobacco dust abundantly worked in around them, and upon the bark use any of the strong contact insecticides, such as a wash of soap solution made as thick as paint. Unusual numbers of katydid eggs have been sent to us with the supposition that they were scale insects of some kind. The speci- men exhibited was received yesterday, showing the eggs attached to a wire; as a rule they are attached to small twigs of trees or shrtb. Please note that practically all of these eggs are punctured with holes of parasites, showing the beneficial effects of parasitic insects in keeping in check what might become a very serious pest. During the past years we have had an outbreak of the Seventeen- year Locust or Cicada, especially throughout the central part of the State, from Montour and Columbia counties, southwestward through the mountainous country, reaching across into Bedford, Blair and Cambria counties, and including several other counties in that region not here named. . pages, 1902. - No. 91. Canning of Fruits and Vv egetables, 57 pages, 1902. No. 92.* List of Licenses Granted by the Dairy and Food Com- missioner, 193 pages, 1902. No. 93. The Fundamentals of Spraying, 35 pages, 1902. *Note.—Edition exhausted. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 657 No. 94. Phosphates—Phosphatic or Phosphoric Acid Fertilizers, 87, pages, 1902. No. 95.* County and Local Agricultural Societies, 1902, 12 pages, 1902. No. 96. Insects Injurious to Cucurbitaceous Plants, 31 pages, 1902. No. 97. The Management of Greenhouses, 41 pages, 1902. No. 98. Bacteria of the Soil in their Relation to Agriculture, 88 pages, 1902. No. 99. Some Common Insect Pests of the Farmer, 32 pages, 1902. No. 100.* Containing Statement of Work of Dairy and Food Di- vision from January 1, 1902, to June 30, 1902, 225 pages, 1902. Ne: 1Od.* Tabulated Analyses of Commercial Fertilizers, 137 pages, 1902. No. 102. The Natural Improvement of Soils, 50 pages, 1902. No. 103.* List of Farmers’ Institutes of Pennsylvania, 67 pages, 1902. No. 104. Modern Dairy Science and Practice, 127 pages, 1902. No. 105.* Potato Culture, 9 pages, 1902. No. 106. The Varieties of Fruit that can be Profitably Grown in Pennsylvania, 50 pages, 1902. No. 107. Analyses of Concentrated Commercial Feed Stuffs, 62 pages, 1903. No. 108. The Hessian Fly in Pennsylvania, —— 1903 (Never printed.) No. 109.* Tabulated Analyses of Commercial Fertilizers 208 pages, 1903. : No. 110.* Containing Statement of Work of Dairy and Food Di- vision from July 1, to December 31, 1902, 248 pages, 1903. No. 111. Smail Fruits, their Origin, Gulture and Marketing, 66 pages, 1903. No. 112.* List of County and Local Agricultural Societies, 10 pages, 1903. No. 113. Methods of Milking, 96 pages, 1903. No. 114.* Tabulated Analyses of Commercial Fertilizers, 116 pages, 1903. No. 115. Proceedings of Annual Meeting of Farmers’ Institute Managers and Lecturers, 210 pages, 1903. No. 116* Farmers Institutes in Pennsylvania, Season 1903-1904, 64 pages, 1903. No. 117. Potash Fertilizers—Sources and Methods of Applica- tion, 46 pages, 1903. No. 118.* Containing the Laws Creating the Office of Dairy and Food Commissioner in Pennsylvania, and also a Digest of the Acts of Assembly Committed to his Administration, 62 pages, 1903. No. 119.* Tabulated Analyses of Commercial. Fertilizers, 115 pages, 1903. No. 120. The Apple-tree Tent-caterpillar, 46 pages, 1903. No. 121. Address of Hon. Joseph W. Hunter, State Highway Commissioner, Delivered at Annual Meeting of State Board of Agri- culture, January 28, 1904, 16 pages, 1903. *Note.—Edition exhausted. 42—_7—1906. 658 ANNUAL REPORT OF THB Off. Doc. No. 122.* Analyses of Concentrated Commercial Feeding Stuffs, 52 pages, 1904. No. 123. Chestnut Culture, 50 pages, 1904. No. 124.* County and Local Agricultural Fairs, 10 pages, 1904. No. 125. The Source and Nature of Bacteria in Milk, 41 pages, 1904. No. 126.* Tabulated Analyses of Commercial Fertilizers, January 1, to August 1, 140 pages, 1904. No. 127.* Farmers’ Institutes in Pennsylvania, 71 pages, 1904. No. 128. Grape Culture, 62 pages, 1904. No. 129. Alfalfa Culture in Humid Land, 64 pages, 1904. No. 130. The Cow-pea in the North, 41 pages, 1904. No. 181. Proceedings, State Board of Agriculture and Farmers’ Normal Institute, 260 pages, 1904. No. 132.* Analyses of Commercial Fertilizers, August 1, to Dec- ember 31, 70 pages, 1904. No. 133. The Improvement of Corn in Pennsylvania, 76 pages, 1904. No. 134. Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the State Board of Agriculture, 152 pages, 1905. No. 135. Analyses of Concentrated Feeding Stuffs, 41 pages, 1905. No. 186.* List of County and Local Agricultural Societies, 8 pages, 1905. No. 137. Proceedings, Spring Meeting State Board of Agricul- ture and Farmers’ Annual Normal Institute, 216 pages, 1905. No. 138.* Analyses Concentrated Commercial Fertilizers, January 1, to August 1, 106 pages, 1905. No. 139.* Farmers’ Institutes in Pennsylvania, 1905-1906, 93 pages, 1905. No. 140. Sheep Husbandry, 69 pages, 1905. No. 141. Laws Relating to the Dairy and Food Division, 47 pages, 1905. No. 142.* Analyses Concentrated Commercial Fertilizers, August 1, to December 31, 61 pages, 1905. No. 143. Pouitry in Pennsylvania, 36 pages, 1906. No. 144. Proceedings of 29th Annual Meeting State Board of Agriculture, 191 pages, 1906. No. 145. Commercial Feeding Stuffs in Pennsylvania, 51 pages, 1906. No. 146. List of County and Local Agricultural Societies, 10 pages, 1906. No. 147. Market Gardening, 53 pages, 1906. No. 148. Report of the Bee-Keepers Association of Penna., 57 pages, 1906. No. 149. Analyses Commercial Fertilizers January 1-August 1, 06. 80 pages, 1906. No. 150. Farmers’ Institutes in Penna., for year 1906-1907, 72 pages, 1906. No. 151. Proceedings Spring Meeting of State Board of Agricul: ture and Farmers’ Annual Normal Institute, 190 pages, 1906. No. 152. Fruit for Pennsylvania, 330 pages, 1906. No. 158. Analyses Commercial Fertilizers August 1-December 31, 1906, 60 pages, 1906. *Note.—Edition exhausted. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 659 FERTILIZER VALUATIONS—1906. The object of an official valuation of commercial fertilizers is to enable the consumer to judge approximately whether he has been asked to pay for a given brand more than the fertilizing ingredients it contains and market conditions prevailing at the time would war- rant. It is clear, therefore, that na attempt is made in this valua- tion to indicate whether the fertilizer valued possesses a greater or less crop-producing capacity than another fertilizer; but only whether it is higher priced than another of the same general com- position. For this purpose it must be so computed as to include all the elements entering into the cost of a fertilizer as it is delivered to the consumer. These elements may be conveniently grouped as follows: 1; The wholesale cost of the ingredients. 2. The jobbers’ gross profit on the sale of the ingredients; this includes office expenses, advertising, losses, etc.; for the purpose of the present computation it may be assumed that the sum of this gross profit and the wholesale cost of the ingredients is equivalent to the retail price of the single ingredients near the wholesale mar- kets in ton lots of original packages for cash. 3. The expense and profit of mixing: This item applies only to complete fertilizers, rock and potash, and ammoniated rock; not to dissolved or ground bone, or to dissolved rock. 4, The expense and profit of bagging. 5. Agents’ commission: This item includes not only the commis- sion proper, but every advance in price due to the sale of the goods through an agent in small quantities on time, rather than directly to the consumer in ton lots for cash. 6. Freight from the wholesale market to the point of delivery. The valuations for 1905 were based: 1. Upon the wholesale prices from September 1, 1904, to March 1, 1905, of the raw materials used in fertilizer manufacture, the quota- tions of the New York market being adopted for all materials ex- cept acidulated phosphate rock and sround bone. 2. Upon an allowance of 20 per cent. of the wholesale prices, above mentioned, to cover jobbers’ profit. By adding the 20 per cent. allowed for jobbers’ gross profit to the wholesale price of the several raw materials, the retail price in original packages at the jobbers’ warehouse is obtained. Since the amount of the several valuable fertilizing constituents in the various raw materials is known, it is a simple matter to de- termine the corresponding retail value per pound of the valuable fertilizing constituents yielded by each raw material. A schedule of these pound values affords a convenient basis of computation of the value per ton of various fertilizers, whose composition is ascer- tained by analysis. 600 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. The valeus assigned, for the present, to the other elements in the cost of the fertilizer at the point of a delivery are: 3. For mixing, $1.00 per ton. 4. For bagging, $1.00 per ton, in all cases except those in which the article was sold in original packages; the cost of the package being, in such cases, included in the wholesale price. 5. For agents’ commissions, 20 per cent. of the cost of the goods f. o. b. at the jobbers’ or mixers’ warehouse. 6. For freight, $2.00 per ton; the cost of the freight in lots of twelve tons or over, from the seaboard to Harrisburg, averaging $1.88 per ton. The following valuation of dissolved South Carolina rock illus- trates the method: Phosphoric acid. Per cent. Weight per ton. Solt ple te) sae eet nats ese ape er te i 11.50 230 Tbs. at 3c. $6 90 REVELCO, crc o Ramee Pie anes 2.50 50 tbs. at 2$c. 1 25 TOU WME ae. Bere seats cen. Saeed 1.00 20 Ibs. at Ide. 30 Retail-cash value of ingredients: >. (nf: 2 aie oe ee eee $8 45 BAD OIMS iis 8 alos ae Sieled Rawr oa Cow Wid Slates ate or ee Loe eae aaee 1 00 Cash value of goods ready for shipment, .........<-- 64.7 g9 45 Arents’ COMMISSION,) 20 per C@Mmitz, s\is sas om eet a cians ier eee 1 89 12) 13h 0) ee ae Nr R RCE A SUNN Som ame terss «Gc ingeees oo Slo < 2 00 Commercial value: per ton, 1.0038 jes ats Santee ee ane .. $13 34 It is not to be expected, of course, that the valuations thus com- puted will precisely represent the fair price to be charged for a brand in each locality and in every transaction. Market conditions, competition, distance from factory; all introduce minor variations. Nevertheless, to make the approximation reasonably close the average valuation of a given class of goods ought to agree closely with its ascertained average selling price. Whenever such an agreement is no longer obtained by the use of a schedule, it is evi- dent that the schedule of retail values of the constituents, or the added allowances for mixing, etc., requires revision. It is needful to note here another factor greatly affecting the prac- tical accuracy of these approximations. Their computation would offer little difficulty and their usefuliess be far greater, if, by the ordinary methods of analysis, the exact nature of the ingredients ased to supply the several fertilizer constituents, were capable of certain determination. This is, however, possible, to-day, to only a limited extent. The valuations are, therefore based on the assump- tion that the fertilizers are uniformly compounded from high qual- ity ingredients, such as are commonly employed in the manufacture of fertilizers of the several classes. Consumers should carefully avoid the error of accepting such valuations as infallible; they,are not designed to be used for close comparisons of single brands, but only to indicate whether the price asked for a fertilizer is abnormal, assuming good quality for the ingredients used. From this it is clear that, except as high freights may require, the selling price of a brand should .not exceed the valuation; but that a fertilizer may be made of inferior materials and yet have a high valuation. IN(Oaanie DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 661 The valuations used during 1904 were modified for use during 1905 in accordance with the changes in wholesale prices of fertilizing ingredients and to make the valuations more closely follow the sell- ing price. The following comparative statement shows the valuations and selling prices of the several classes of fertilizers during 1901 to 1905: Fertilizers. Number of samples. Valuation. Selling price, Difference of valuation from selling price. Spring, 1901. COTielEWE es Ui aah chon Ao dod COMOCOD REO CORE 0 An COCA SnD EST COennC eer 291 24.76 23.92 0. Rock-and-potash, 1 Dissoived bone, Guoumdmbome mir. ete ere rane Ge aces saechu vouibens 44 28.71 27.59 Dissolved rock, Fall, 1901. | PORES TRUER HES ere teseeis eleva sietaioselercteiatols tm siaisteieisictets | 179 23515. | 22.28 1.47 Rock-and-potash, Ae oe Dissolved bone, METI TUTL CL ONIG pieic oe ote id heaiaee oon ea, csalat nl ava. Wate/e-chaxcta «.bsciwisiv eee einielOasione te mee 33 27.69 | 25.94 155 Dissolved rock, | 49 13.82 | 18.18 0.64 Gorip SCORE Nees eRe eee a ats ono eee te ee ooo he 289 25.33 | 24.10 | 1.23 Rock-and-potash, 66 15.05 16.45 —1.40 Dissolved bone, ae 2 17.35 16.450 -85 Se OO UMING SOT Cree aye cistaisininser nies verewiera Sra saninte wis ela ora tatniniaratelarerwsave avereiwiate efeieie te 29 | 26.80 28.52 —1.72 Dissolved rock, 59 3.49 13.73 | —.24 Fall, 1902. COPMTNENEY Sogagass babosudepaucndade bopabddos 46 scbéu docu nodOdsuSeDaden 229} 23.31 21.83 | 1.48 Rock-and-potash, 62 14.46 15.98 —1.52 Dissolved bone, | 6 | 27.08 | | 25.30 1.78 (SHS Tc Gly [GV lie SR er ar or etl a | Bh | tsb) a aShng iG Dissolved rock, 56 | 13.70 13.47 .28 Spring, 1903. Complete, c2:.-2.0.° “5 3F5 24.29 24.57 —.28 Rock-and-potash, . 56 82 | 14.73 17.20 | —2.47 Dissolved bone, 3] 30.87 31.17 —.30 REL TNT TN CLM EOL Osa ah wc os -\cscrexsictaielaverstatelnye) sclayetol flows ieteaueie EEF ae checioncerk inane at | m2) 28.67 —1.42 Dissolved rock, 56 | 3.34 15.13 —1.79 Fall, 1903. | Qo TIS, “askogstioopaccan denon sod cots pod no Ac Canon BLO SaMRaGE Toso. 264. | 22.77 21.98 -79 EGC o POLISH weiss citer ccroetetelsvers eroterae ceteris cowie cide veisie manecloreleeae «| 74 14.86 15.96 | —1.10 DISSOISOUNOOIIG., Meeicjsrectatals ceresnirie ereraciomteratlein svte-cie Slayers ois wats sia ersyare eae | | 24.57 23.67 90 GROUN GEM MOTENE cariectn cepa tclaticmr tele cre miaire Csicee rok wi icincieecisie onesies 49 | 27.07 27.52 —.45 IDISSOLY CM STOCKS | cuersc eieicisctec nie ole sees srayae oieia.c's bls crelsiaistonsia olsen. 60 3.12 14.64 —1.52 Spring, i904. SGTUDIT ERO a oratayara.etsiejateroteisters/siciare ats toitistels erate inva,cisiainicie nisi aor pes eles is oveiayeiaiatere 349 25.07 24.28 «79 ROCK AMO =H OCASIIP vcr crecteecinctemnenictelem seitielncmaet Gres aa cinn swreacieelais 75 15.45 16.47 —1.02 IDFISE OS KGGYol “loxes aves WE AC Ate Seon a i AoSrnOcoRCOnen Sanction ae rcC EE OnE Cre rr 2 28.42 S15 —3.08 Quoi aig! Jefe, Lab adh Ato cP Ge EEC CIT AO RE ET ROCr ACLs ee ames 22 A ew i 28.20 —.43 IDES ONG Del inelise SoppoacneocnceUshaSesnmoccrortnocsae dophesdacoeenG 41 | 14.06 14.59 —.52 } Fall, 1904. | | | Gomiplete; ciencecenes 256 | 22.53 | 21.82 | oral Rock-and-potash, . 68 | 14.92 | 15.89 —.97 Dissolved bone. 6 27.77 24.94 2.83 (Greay patel: 910) 0s saa E Oba OCOBDEOe COCO UAIECROOCOOHE SEaOerOnneaa armors } 3s 27.97 | 27.02 95 Dissolved rock, 45 14.09 13.89 20 Spring, 1905. (Chop etetes ods snabodoo SHO rn AOS ObECOO ano EnEAe ME REELED OOOOROOSICE DE TaG 374 25.60 | 24.63 | .97 RCAC Smee TH TMI EES Ops atae ce oee leieli icicle .elae vide eo Rt en watite ciebemuetaon a aati dare 82 15.49 | TEES —.62 EVES OU CU I OILS at ateietererepa ial ceiesalcte/a. a ale: 1a: 5 es0,0'a1 siete sie) wiala al vichecoiere by atoleyibere 3 | 22.70 23.83 —1.13 CTE NTA ee ieee tat era rm «, Som sini vare wiasesehe a dws dsate oha tteie Mla eia gave 27 26.7: 29.08 | —2.36 WPISSOUVC Umer OGL mae cro sere re niecerpals loons aia o aie oa Frese Areialg wuss, avevelenita crete 47 13.86 3.64 | .22 Fall, 1905. WONUDLGT OM wasray. tyne ataparcte tetera cotta otic fe obi dic- Sialic. we ainselave serie tobe e es 285 22.35 21.39 96 Rock and potash eerie cee ates sic weciaie ee Naineisee so aeaies se ae 74 5.04 15.97 —.97 IDI SSOURCO me OTE ae crte ete een eee iat tersioicio aie ois olsen id sreveinu ciceintcerae 6 25.85 24.78 ieibe COUN GAB DEC Cm os cno a nee Re etree aicfoye aieiersioic cinwioicjeosarnss-vioasieienene 35 28.70 27.70 1.00 DISSOMVC a MOGI acto c a ctomitet eI onan aie aicivicia le: ioiare's ln eseieve o's ciacuislecete 49 13.51 12.21 1.30 662 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. The general tendencies of the wholesale market may be judged from the following comparative statement, obtained from the weekly reports of the Oil, Paint and Drug Reporter, of New York City, showing the average wholesale prices of fertilizer raw ma- terials from September 1, 1904 to March 1, 1905, and from Septem- ber 1, 1905, to March 1, 1906. Wholesale Prices of Fertilizer Ingredients, New York, Oil, Paint and Drug Reporter. - tes his go | gal See 2s Oe = 6,5 5,8 aS ; 2A 3A ae fi 7) uo) °o ° Eo S oF ore 258 Substance. rt 4 Es as & f as BS: pee z go] Sa | gee cote es NES S ssf | es | 886 i ran Pan 3) S) < < < A Supp eeate OL ANTI OND Fe ihelale,c ainsaiele'statelsratetsietslarsievetelaisinsa)ster= GCwiti, cencdscuce soc 3.1367 3.1253 99.6 Wala hese vorw ysfoler tn” asosongecboanaoue oboecarianbodancc ane WY) Cyr sie teretm ete ioseae 2.3116 2.2278 96.4 Dried blood, H. G. | Unit (20 Tbs.)59 =. 2.5933 2.6938 102.3 Concentrated tankage, nit. (20) Boss) P.c. 2.3376 2.2161 94.8 Rough bone, ... 5 MOnNs. des deenvarctasene 16.25 15.96 | 98.2 Bone meal, ... BRON ster pe a nie earaaiee 22.875 22.57 98.7 Fish guano, dry, Reale Unit (20. lbs:), <...'||. 2.543 *2.5536 100.4 HISHVSIUIANOS ACIC a cscisines sie hale ceitapieeine ciech wieeiee ames 1 Unit (20 Ibs:),-... 2.20 72.331 106.0 Refuse bone black, oil, | MIRON Osc a aaeenarereiets 13.65 14.00 102.6 IRVERUISEWHOME! DIAC MSIL EIT: Wesiaicltcics!tictesinisieccicvals cinteeta sales} OTL... « sje atererstaletarate’aseian| Marae hie naLas WS:00) Su deriaiee Phesphate rock: “Charleston, Gace ces vena ve senna moa Sold aie ralatte aati 6.00 5.125 85.4 Phosphate rock, Tennessee | To 3.75 3.87 103.2 INGTON ULE re nlsloreietctorevelece ate rey cis ares nyelelajefarcietutare/aveisiaeteinte 6d8C - 6375. 6375 100.0 TD OMUVED OAM Ue MSEC an veyetelneialnininve ete feveltiajeis oleeietalssetereiaianc tae 1 1.134 1.18 104.0 SUD AEE Od oO COUSIN VEE late cis/ele/o(eievaicla'eiele(s/eieis!slolsieiniaiatelatsle\eteore | Cwt., 2.1288 2.20 103.3 Cairne anal aeeia cist rinteiteaieiaieeininiemeisine electra eiains Mate 9.21 8.50 92.3 MAIRIAHE VOR, MOUBISD ists vcleieis/e arnlelcverstereels(eRiare Od eS 1.9006 1.965 103.4 Sulphuric acid, 66 Deg. B., Ttg, eras 1.346 1.20 89.2 *Bone phosphate of lime 10 cents per unit. +Bone phosphate of lime 35 cents per unit. In ammoniates such as dried blood and fish guano, the unit is of ammonia, of which 82.35 per cent. is nitrogen; in acid phosphates, the unit is of phosphoric acid (phosphorus pentoxid). With the exception of dried blood and fish guano which have ad- vanced in price, the nitrogenous materials show a decrease from last year’s prices. The most marked changes occur in case of concentrated tankage and nitrate of soda. The following data are from the monthly reports of Thos. J. White & Co., fertilizer brokers, Baltimore, Md., giving wholesale quotations upon ammoniates No. 7. S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 663 Wholesale Prices of Ammoniates: Reports of Thos. J. White & Co., Baltimore, Md. | 2 3 Pee g 1S a} fi | &s AS 45 or ote n OWN 4 5 n n oa og Ee rea Ay Ay Salone tem ot emda Ona) mlm CWite a) tisel-felel=isie ouislelciosislor sleinls einislsiels eisle(sisis/clnisirieleinialsisieivicieie\elsiai|\ Gal O08 3.125 EN iced GE MeO me On Fe aiaats eiciale ciel lu vic ele in)ocelelele e/sin'sialalolai=.c)s)a/e)s\~/aie/e/=\0\e/els|vie\a's/ainjn\e\e w'eleiele\s /e'=\vielels/a)s, 2.2896 2.203 Ground blood, f. o. b. Chicago, per unit of ammonia, ......4-..50..-.eeeeeeeeeeee 2.6042 2.4893 Concentrated tankage, f. 0. b. Chicago, per unit of ammonia, .........-........ 2.3416 2.2125 Crushed tankage ec. a. f. Baltimore, per unit ammonia: 9 per cent. ammonia, 20 per cent. bone phosphate, ..........s.sseseeeeenees 2.575 *2 6125 Unground tankage f. o. b. Chicago, per unit of ammonia: 9 per cent. ammonia, 20 per cent. bone phosphate, ...........-.-ssseeeeeeee ¥*2.17 *2.10 Ground tankage f. o. b. Chicago, per unit of ammonia: it! per cent. ammonia, 15 per cent: bone phosphate, .....:........0..00...5-. 2.275 « 72.312 10 per cent. ammonia, 20 per cent. bone phosphate, ............ sees eee eee e eee 2.35 42.25 8 per cent. ammonia, 30 per cent. bone phosphate, ....0...0. se csce nce cewcine [escsenceee $2.15 Hoot meal £0. b. Chicago, per unit OF AMMONIA, 2.2... cece cece ccc nsmcencns 2.4225 §2.45 *September quotations lacking. 7Bone phosphate of lime 10 cents. tSeptember and October quotations only. §September, February and March quotations. New York wholesale quotations for acid phosphate, per unit of available phosphoric acid, remained the same as last year. Quotations from the Journal of Commerce issue a value of $.318 per lb. of available phosphoric acid which is also unchanged from 1905. Early this year acid phosphate was quoted to inquirers in Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Jersey at about the same retail price as last year. Potash Salts:—-The reports of the U. S. Bureau of Statistics show the following entries for consumption during the fiscal year 1904 and 1905. 1904. 1905. Ripa rad crea CRO LITA CLS) a. stayeraysin otaiata etersisictelefetnistefeteisiaie clei eleialelelelsieyelaietafereie(sisisiere/sicvele a sve|sie 161,503, 735 202, 366, 601 GES ee IIST te CLCHS | fararctelopererereretmte te eleisinjclelsis eferer esate ejslaicieicic\si-releiele sisisteyeisieieicis's 158, 984 240, 789 This trade is so managed that. by March nearly all wholesale de- liveries of the vear are contracted for. The prices for potashes for 1905 as announced by the German Potash Syndicate show no changes from last years quotations. The schedule of prices on the basis of large lots sold through brokers and delivered at Boston, New York or Philadelphia, is as follows: 664 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doe. | = Salt. is S Sy | ot ail = a 2 3 3 Pan = < PuTiate 80) per Certs.) Perel O0 MD Sas sale seictereieieis scott oialelers eles cja/ajoicierstaleiaistaisiacte/sttletctvheleretetsttoe 1.885 1.915 Sulphate, 48 per cent. potash, per 100 Ibs., ..............0.. eat 2AT 2.20 Double manure salt, 48-50 per cent., per 100 Ibs., ah Po bey 2.20 Kainit= 12° per cent... actual potash, “Mer | COU. se kicie ce sic siclaleieiecejerere “Ae wintbisias le eeleiehe ele 8.25: 8.50 Manure saltse/20) per cent. pOtashy per eGOM, , (e).sis cers i etetere sieialetacisielvuere otielelsleioleirieiteiatt aie 14.68 15.08 Composition of Raw Materials.—In order to form a correct idea of the cost per pound of the fertilizer constituents of these ma- terials, it is needful to determine their composition or, in other words, the quantities of valuable constituents each contain. The following table shows the composition of the raw materials used in the manufacture of fertilizers. No analyses of these materials, with the exception of ground bone and dissolved roek, have been made in Pennsylvania. The figures in the following table include the averages of the results of analyses made in Connecticut, New Jersey and Massachusetts during the past year, except in the case of ground bone and dissolved rock phosphates, where Pennsylvania re- sults alone are included. Composition of Non-Acidulated Fertilizer Ingredients. (Per cent.) s |: og E 3 ° n | cd | FS ol a ce] AS g r= os % a a Sa | {o) n 4 rss} 8 s & oa ot le) ie) a vA fy H SyoUboiakehwsy one eebackeskopateety I dodeacinc oocoonnooacoudadadtoc toconcenabedse 1 PALA Acorn eseae INUPra Tes OF, SOG ivis.c:eisteratternoolaiemere oreveters oiotars isle eer foie sortie are SIERO: 28 THis | AGe Seopcc iD Fehhs10 lM) 0) Lovo BMRA Sara S aos antnG ao Cnn Oost aA ODO bon rea conodhcte over 12 LO OTL P| a scseerers ae GOUT DONC Re x miersiclerctersiaterstetstinrereiereio cern eisierarsis real ete ei ovetaie ebelctceteretcne tolate 62 SolDe | Patna sets Hf BETiall ee = Wen aH O HNN REOA ORD Ode ABOSSSU DAAC o Io neanoD Gato rba nelidoa saanisa 14 (by lhScoomaben Grounds MASI Wet sacireemierectestecin siseleinceeh eerie eit eo cleenee cee 14 BEZO) | lisennsere Cottony seed’ meahyee atest cristae nie viocere cin ae cre ence nie eae 157 7.03 1.90 Castor i DOMLACE: Me cnmecarmee eas. cates cate soe taneeee co ton Bee 4 4.70 1.00 Sulphate sof ypotashh wibts (Ge semanas ceriese hace aceemneee ree Gi limemenertae 49.66 Wruniate (OF OASIS o ddcnhacise iste nase croton tctalyutis bn Raat neh Coane NG | Wale etieterstete 51.29 Le hla idee Ona caonpatcpcdondodoe sone acter acute anonen Comer aoabaso bows ibe | Weaeanoase 12.49 Double sulphate of potash and magnesia, ................00- (fel Seee can 26.68 No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 665 Composition of Acidulated Fertilizer Ingredients. (Per cent.) | 3 ao Se sey ee ro} 3} 6 i} ) rs a G a po] = a Q Q Q n n n a ont ° ° ° (o) ao a = on is Qa a a 3 fay cs) S 2 Vp - - 2 . 2S = ad ke! ie) = 5 8 aS >O 35 = 5 oe oa as | a | a n ice] =| PMIESOLVEGs DOME DIACK «5.02 nicieleiia’s ve sisinieleiciveinsiaisiestivicwle.s'c 3 16.74 11.95 3.06 1.73 PRPS ES MINI EI rice ic ois, crarn od siete ie ainicioinle mintete eect a piste clove olate | 9 14.60 4.27 5.92 4.42 Dissolved, rock’ Phosphate; geese. ccescescssecmejeweedees | 96 15.86 9.75 4.75 1.36 *Also contains 1.90 per cent. nitrogen. Cost per pound of Fertilizer Constituents.—With the composition of these raw materials and their price per ton, hundred weight, or other unit of measure as a basis, the wholesale cost per pound of the valuable constituents can be readily calculated. In many cases the ammoniates are quoted “per unit of ammonia,” the term unit being equivalent to per cent.; in goods sold by the ton of 2,000Ibs., the unit is equal to 20Ibs., and 20Ibs. of: ammonia contain 16.47ibs. of nitrogen. In the case of refuse bone-black, unacidulated, the mean, 28.25 per cent. of phosphoric acid, is assumed to represent the average material on the market. Phosphate rock is sold by the ton of 2,240Ibs., and on the basis of the bone phosphate of lime it contains, with drawbacks for in- jurious constituents. Bone-phosphate of lime contains 455.8 per cent. of phosphoric acid; therefore, each per cent. of bone phosphate in a long ton is equivalent ot 22.4 Ibs. and contains 10.26 Ibs. of phosphoric acid. In the wholesale trade, dried blood, azotine, concentrated tankage and hoof meals are usually sold on the basis of ammonia, disregard- ing the phosphoric acid present. Insoluble phosphoric acid in dissolved rock is likewise omitted from consideration, contracts being based solely upon the “avail- able” phosphoric acid; nor in rock phosphates is any claim made for the small quantities of nitrogen and potash they contain, nor in dis- solved bone for the potash present. Under these conditions, the wholesale cost per pound in New York of the valuable constituents of such materials as furnish but a single fertilizing element, these materials being assumed to be in the state of preparation and in the packing in which the manufac- turer purchased them, are given in the following table; also a figure representing a fair retail price at the factory, the materials having undergone no change in treatment or packing and the allow- ance for expenses and profit in retailing being 20 per cent. 43 666 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. Wholesale Cost Per Pound of Fertilizer Constituents. (New York.) I. Ingredients Supplying One Constituent. age: Vv 2 ) 8 gs = i Material. ie & a= & 2 28 3 3 5, ) wn go = 2 2a 7 2 S e re xs 6) oat = B Sulphate] Of AMMONIA, wastes bin sherstersareleiaoretsimininiaisitos as Inplisafaerl, SaoAqooaoasoncshon DoT 15.30 18.68 INftrateviot (SOG a cc cmisitin cet sicyoeeiciesstrastae seinieelcemei INIELOLENS saceiiderst eam ecte cee 14.33 17.20 Dried) DLOOd.) WISH SATS, oie oleke chelolelnialaie’e\stn1s/blataiainictaraielera INTETOBEN) ccc cachionqets ceueses 16.11 19.33 Concentrated pram KAe Se ictc erties aia sic eiciele stekiotelerialiamieics INItrosenoe aastecnsccee tema 13.43 16.12 Refuse bone black: 10} | Beha kednrigo con cuarlore™Gc Gaecuore asinoconaansgped: aon Phosphorie acid, total, .... 2.48 2.99 SUEESOS ) ShGnce concpo sae oa napocnocpooadachecds. rane 6 Phosphoric acid, total, .... 3.19 3.83 Phosphate rock:* s TRETINERSCE® W178 IPT CEC. y, \cise sacle clcimele claisisinm plese nies Phosphoric acid, total, .... .515 -618 South Carolina, 60 per cent., .-| Phosphoric acid, total, .... .670 -804 PACA PHOSDNAKE: | spastieele es sisainale .| Phosphorie acid available,. 3.19 3.83 Double manure salts, ........... Bene POTASH a scccnenaateenaeeeeete 4,43 5.32 SiUPHATE Of POCAS peta cecins we oeeinein a clotels o ccclarie dialeleteclciats IPOPASH YT dal tertwee eeiicm ceemtetats 4.52 5.42 MUIEIATE FOL POLAR s oie are cjstoa nots aici ininisicio'e sre alee aintoratsiota aie Potash et vaste s sissiiciniemieecteaeinte 3.75 4.50 RGA IAT Eerie aaleistn aie sie elniaicie sina/ ste sieieieialas oi sieistete aieleietelelaistele Potash; |i ceacseerseecaccs setae 2.97 3.56 *The prices of phosphate rock are ff o. b. at the respective points of shipment, not New York, and are taken from the reports of the Engineering and Mining Journal. The prices for potash are taken from the schedule of the syndicate. The prices for concentrated tankage are taken from the reports of Thos. J. White & Co., and those of the remainder from the Oil, Paint and Drug Reporter. The quotations for bone are given without specific reference to quality, so that it is impossible from these data to fairly apportion their several wholesale values to the nitrogen and phosphoric acid contained in this material. As compared with tankage, the general tendency is to assign a higher commercial rating to the phosphoric acid in bone and to the nitrogen a rating not very dif- ferent from that given in tankage. The quotations of Thos. J. White & Co. show an average wholesale rate in Baltimore during September, 1904, to March, 1905, for crushed tankage to have been 2.6125 per unit of ammonia and $0.10 per unit of bone phosphate of lime. This is equivalent to $3.17 per unit of nitrogen and $.218 per unit of phosphoric acid. The average composition of the ground bone and bone meal samples analyzed last fall in Pennsylvania was: Phosphoric acid, 22.59 per cent.; nitrogen, 2.96 per cent. The pre- pared bone contains less fat and moisture and often less nitrogen than the ordinary “rough bone,” but these differences tend, in a man- ner, to neutralize each other. Assuming for the rough bone quoted in the New York market the same composition as the bone meal sold in Pennsylvania and for the value of the nitrogen $3.17 per unit, the values per pound of the sev- eral constituents would be: No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 667 Wholesale Cost per Pound of Fertilizer Constituents, New York. If. Bone. 2 = cs} a 5 : © 3 3% 2 > =e Aa fe = 8 i 2 | 3 be 5 & 2 z ae pee iS) o E 5 FE CIS TIALG 7 cicisinies siniermnteieleisis etelelsloiels/ereletaial si ciate esl sielatecclelerl PENTENOR Eris chic cee sictcwasne steals 15.85 19.02 UPhosphorie acids. ccceuescee 1.46 1.75 SrOUNGe DONC. Meewccs cctieicion civics isiaisuciciswiecicteleisiscie cacleles (eNittrorente.-ceeccccececcciests 22.41 26.88 : (Phosphoric acid, ........... 2.06 | 2.47 Valuation in Neighboring States. It is desirable, from all points of view, that the schedules of val- uation throughout a district in which similar market conditions pre- vail, should differ as little as possible. It has been our practice in the past, to conform our schedule to that adopted after very careful cooperative study of market conditions for each year, by the New England States and New Jersey, except where the peculiar condi- tions of our markets have made the valuations diverge too largely from the actual selling prices, as in the case of ground bone and dissolved rock phosphates. ‘The schedules for these States for 1905 and 1906 are as follows: Trade Values Adopted by the New England States and New Jersey. Cents Bas per pound. aS cu boll =) ee * “Ss | Su | 3} is $ =o CR) ES 5 > Nitrogen: WAPATO ea BALERS win wo wrerlete eteininlsiv nie alas nloleid aielelase ia wieTeinlel«\vioie,cjeinicinle = clave visie 17% 1714 100 RRR TALE AEE ye atu = a cinta’ 10 pinivlolele/=in'ainlelalnvelelalo'viole/e\claluleiaie-nle\vid'v'e(a(ale eis e/siejc\s civiels «vies cles 17.0 16% 97.1 TnetiryeanoNtne Pround: LSM yee wees ccs cence aisemecise vsrisisesn ein cieeen,c 1814 1814 100 In meat, pblogd and mixed! Fertilizers 2.2. asicisteccsccciscicinslsjcesdecccacse 18% 18% 100 In’ fine ground bone and tanKage, 2... , ne anbonoqHdbo cu [beonobor oooUADt Dodoo onuOoKBONSnuDOGC 14 Tin coarse DOWMC UG eta Ti a clotais cloreieteteletnsa <) etelalaye 3 Soluble in’ ammonium citrate; “in bone fertilizers, “erect. w/-coc oe ete «a neem wma 4 Soluble. in ammonium ‘citrate, in rock’ fertilizers, eehic series «ese eceitiemsic ewes 216 Insoluble in ammonium citrate, in bone fertilizers, ...............scceescscsseeee 2 Insoluble in ammonium citrate, in rock fertilizers, .... 0.200.200 Mccccnwesoucte 1% In fine bone, tankage and fish, 3 In coarse bone and tanKage, .........cccessccescccenscsccss : eer 216 In cotton seed meal, castor pomace and wood ashes, ...........+eeeeeee- Tee 4 Potash: In high grade sulphate or in forms free from muriate, ................0sseeeees 5 BAS PINUTIDER, + oy cota widow c o:c'ale.cieleicis ware sieve blaleve le aieis a bie ipieiaiereisto oni eine notte a mn een ae mele retiee 4% Potash in excess of that equivalent to the chlorin present, will be valued as sulphate, and the remainder as muriate. Nitrogen in mixed fertilizers will be valued as derived from the best sources of organic nitrogen, unless clear evidence to the con- trary is obtained. Phosphoric acid in mixed fertilizers is valued at bone phosphoric acid prices, unless clearly found to be derived from rock phosphate. Bone is sifted into two grades of fineness: Fine, less than 1-50 inch in diameter; coarse, over 1.50 inch in diameter. The result obtained by the use of this schedule does not cover the items of mixing, bagging, freight and agents’ commission. To cover these, allowances are made as follows: For freight, an allowauce of $2.00 per ton on all fertilizers. For bagging, an allowance of $1.00 per ton on all fertilizers, ex- cept when sold in original packages. For mixing, an allowance of $1.00 per ton on complete fertilizers and rock-and-potash goods, For agents’ commission, an allowance of 20 per cent. is added to the cash value of the goods ready for shipment. No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 669 FERTILIZER ANALYSES JANUARY 1, TO AUGUST 1, 1906. Since January 1, 1906, there have been received from authorized sampling agents twelve hundred and fifty-three fertilizer samples, of which six hundred and five were subject to analysis, the remainder being rejected either because they represented brands analyzed last season, or because they were regarded as not certainly representa- tive of the brand whose name they bore. When two or more samples representing the same brand were received equal portions from the several samples were united and the composite sample was subject- ed to analysis. The samples analyzed group themselves as follows, 285 complete fertilizers, furnishing phosphoric acid, potash and nitrogen; 6 dis- solved bones furnishing phosphoric acid and nitrogen; 74 rock-and potash fertilizers, furnishing phosphoric acid and potash; 49 acidu- lated rock phosphates, furnishing phosphoric acid only; 35 ground bones, furnishing phosphoric acid and nitrogen, and one miscellane- ous sample, which group includes substances not properly classified under the foregoing heads. The determinations to which a complete fertilizer is subjected are as follows: (1) Moisture, useful for the comparison of analyses, for indication of dry condition and fitness for drilling, and also of the couditions under which the fertilizer was kept in the warehouse. (2) Phosphoric acid—total, that portion soluble in water, and of the residue, that portion not soluble in warm ammonia citrate solution (a solution supposed to represent the action of plant roots upon the fertilizer), which is assumed to have little immediate food value. By difference, it is easy to compute the so-called “reverted” acid, which is the portion insoluble in water but soluble in the citrate. The sum of the soluble and reverted is commonly called the “avail- able” phosphoric acid. (8) Potash soluble in water—most of that present in green sand marl and crushed minerals, and even some of that present in vegetable materials such as cotton-seed meal, not being included because insoluble in water even after long boiling. (4) Nitrogen—This element is determined by a method which simply accounts for all present, without distinguishing between the quanti- ties present in the several forms of ammonium salts, nitrates or or- ganic matter. (5) Chlorin; this determination is made to afford a basis for estimating the proportion of the potash that is present as chlorid of muriate, the cheaper source. The computation is made on the assumption that the chlorin present, unless in excess has been introduced in the form of muriate of potash; but doubtless there are occasional exceptions to this rule. One part of chlorin combines with 1.326 parts of potash to form the pure muriate; know- ing the chlorin, it is, therefore, easy to compute the potash equiva- lent thereto. (7) In the case of ground bone, the state of sub-divi- sion is determined by sifting through accurately made sieves; the cost of preparation and especially the promptness of action of bone in the soil depends very largely on the fineness of its particles the finer being much more quickly useful to the plant. s 670 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. The law having required the manufacturer to guarantee the amount of certain valuable ingredients present in any brand he may put upon the market, chemical analysis is employed to verify the guaranties stamped upon the fertilizer sacks. It has, therefore, been deemed desirable in this report to enter the guaranty filed by the manufacture in the office of the Secretary of Agriculture, in such connection with the analytical results that the two may be compared. An unfortunate practice has-grown up among manu- facturers of so wording the guaranty that it seems to declare the presence in the goods of an amount of a valuable constituent ranging from a certain minimum to a much higher maximum; thus, “Potash, 2 to 4 per cent.” is a guaranty not infrequently given. In reality, the sole guaranty is for 2 per cent. The guaranteed amounts given for each brand in the following tables, are copied from the guaran- ties filed by the maker of the goods with the Secretary of Agricul- ture, the lowest figure given for any constituent being considered to be the amount guaranteed. For compactness and because no essentially important fact is suppressed thereby, the guaranties for soluble and reverted phosphoric acid have not been given sepa- rately, but are combined into a single guaranty for available phos- phoric acid; in cases where the maker’s guaranty does not specific- ally mention available phosphoric acid, the sum of the lowest figures given by him for soluble and reverted phosphoric acid is used. The law of 1879 allowed the maker to express his guaranty for nitro- gen either in terms of that element or in terms of the ammonia equivalent thereto; since ammonia is composed of three parts of hydrogen and fourteen parts of nitrogen, it is a very simple matter to calculate the amount of one, when the amount of the other is given; the amount of nitrogen multiplied by 1.214 will give the corresponding amount of ammonia, and the amount of ammonia multiplied by 0.824 will give the corresponding amount of nitrogen. In these tables, the expression is in terms of nitrogen. The law of 1901 abolishes this alternative and requires that the guaranty shall be given in terms of nitrogen. Many manufacturers after complying with the terms of the law, insert additional items in their guaranties, often with the result of misleading or confus- ing the buyer; the latter will do well to give heed to those items only that are given as the law requires and that are presented in these tables. A summary of the analyses made this season may be presented as follows: No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 671 Summary of Analyses Made This Season. a o N aq S z 5 2 » oa) o 3 a F z 5 2 fe z 3 2 @ » 2 z a fe) Fh Seeual -eF ols) e spaee 1S) fo A 2) o Number of analyses, ............. Sadrealectinees vexlecceie 412 99 4 RIGISEHTe DECOM Car) Maan siticcielas cies o> a)lersre sisiaisievaiaynia/cteraierele 9.66 10.68 | 58 Phosphorie acid: Pt ei Ve OIE oti wisia eevinpsie® sioeis wins ares arose etwcole (ale wi aeisrel 9.85 11.31 14.91 Solubleyiper cantar, ce cnassncsanas meleseencas meh elas > 4.46 5.86 4.16 FROVERCGO SET (CEE. oils a cirs ol6 ,« picmfoteisis = biacmievinrsie'eiaiaseleis 3.50 4.25 4.07 EnSOluples Were CeMbsy fete e feretsie alevsietel stele a ietetotereraieteleyale\s 1.89 1.20 6.68 | POTASH DOT MGEUGs mteerecle steers eteisteraiatsrslaie nielela(oinlalereiatsisials elatciay= 4.24 bee ie koaaoacene INTERGE Sr Per OIG aocseieioiejaiovernteie eleva sieteiaieys ere /aiclelaloieloiere TT ET Mer ceaecee | 1.77 Mechanical analysis of bone: EYRE siatarcre aia reieraforeseie lo nioie eters tol ay atctereraioter itereintalainrsmeiacerecatsl= COBALTSE. co chncscaceccewen lente Commercial valuation, Average selling price, Commercial value of samples whose selling price is ascertalmeds Mii candids coe's Soccisiccmacentnciion oasis sere wbteine.e 24.76 15.19 22.65 | The cases of departure of goods from their guaranteed composi- tion observed this season, including only those cases in which it amounted to two-tenths per cent. or more, were as follows: Summary of Instances of Deficiency From Guaranty. n he o fs) a 3 a ey r o r) A 9 ® “ A, a) io r= g e 3 3 s 2 5 2 5 = Q ° fe) E 3 A = 5 io) fo} _ = o iS) en] A Q o | | Deficient in four constituents, 22.06.05. ccwcccceccccee KY || aoeadosoc [esajctoie o:sveteiat | Mavotaretelorataerl | Petareensternere Deficient in three constituents, ...........ccscessee 15 Pal Ree Ieanne | eacudaco |toddosbdac Deficient in two constituents ce dens sescwesscicics ones 51 6 2 4 a Deficient in one ‘constituenty ie. cece cscs emsie cece closes cc 118 BAU | eteretscectes 9 15 Total samples in whic& deficiency occurred,.. 187 42 | 2 13 | 16 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. 672 ‘pepi00e1 o18 soljUBIBNs YOIUM JOJ poezA[Bue so[dui"es OM} ATUO§ ‘poWtodedl o1B SoljUvIBNS YOIUM JOJ pozA[euB So[dures OM} A[UOT “pezA[eue ofdures suo A[uUO}L ‘pezA[eue sojdures OM} A[UOy a 2 : 5 | Aiea Marat cra ‘ ‘ : ; T's8 Zee 58 9° ¥8 Zoe B6z \ | 6°08 snoouet[ao 8°Eh aac 8°28 vty 9°68 Le 4 vo | € Z 6% BRK ee pL ae rie 0°0F 8°98 eal beeen 8°88 0°82 raps 2'8t ve 8°II L'98 2°92 PST eg _‘auoq punoip eee 0°0L £6 TI 0°02 0°02 2°83 6°8 2°ST 2'8 geo | #°6T ¥¢ S51 Sige see cee | ‘y901 paatosstq oe 0°88 6°08 8°98 Log papas 6°28 G*&h 8°08 Z°9% Lig | £8 2°63 Z'HE (ago all Qupomiee ysejod pue you a 9°99 odors | 0°03 t 9°89 8°88 0-08 0'00Ts | 0°0F $ | 0°0Se =| 070% «=| 8°FT ogee geo co fauoq peafosstq oF G18 g°o8 36) g°68 6° LE g"28 198 0°0F 9°78 gTe | 807 ‘iva? Lee v'Se sJazI[NIes eyalduiog i eae 7 | | mn | 1 A 1 ty 1 tT! Ry wa hy wm hy wn by mn Beplve ete eset ee ce Ee Mipon? alse Aaa ceo WER cee eeste a aie pe S = 3 = 5 : 5 = 5 : 5 : I : 5 R = : rr 5B © 2 s a 3 ie = B = 2 8 Es - Z ° a 3 e 7 peas ; ‘ ee ee ee ‘OOGL-GE8T ‘AousIIyod Jo vse] UIdI0g ISMOT[OJ SV 91 ‘pazkTVUL SSBID TORI JO SpOOS Jo JoquINU [B}0} Ot} JO asridediod Ul possoud -XO SOTJULALNS ILIY} YIM poreduo0d sv SpooOs of} Ul SUOSBOS Hoo}AIY} jsed oy} SuLINnp po}ou AoUePOGeop Jo Sosvo oT No. 7. DEPARTMENT Of AGRICULTURE. 673 FERTILIZER ANALYSES AUGUST 1, TO DECEMBER 831, 1906. Since August 1, 1906 there have been received from authorized sampling agents eleven hundred and ten fertilizer samples, of which four hundred and twenty-two were subject to analysis, the re- mainder being rejected either because they represented brands analyzed last season, or because they were regarded as not certainly representative of the brand whose name they bore. When two or more samples representing the same brand were received equal por- tions from the several samples were united and the composite sam- ple was subject to analysis. The samples analyzed group themselves as follows, 266 complete fertilizers, furnishing phosphoric acid, potash and nitrogen; 7 dis- solved bones furnishing phosphoric acid and nitrogen; 71 rock-and- potash fertilizers, furnishing phosphoric acid and potash; 43 acidu- lated rock phosphates, funishing phosphoric acid only; 34 ground bones, furnishing phosphoric acid and nitrogen, and one miscellane- ous sample, which group includes substances not properly classified under the foregoing heads. The determinations to which a complete fertilizer is subjected are as follows: (1) Moisture, useful for the comparison of analyses, for indication of dry condition and fitness for drilling, and also of the conditions under which the fertilizer was kept in the warehouse. (2) Phosphoric acid—total, that portion soluble in water, andof the residue, that portion not soluble in warm ammonia citrate solution (a solution supposed to represent the action of plant roots upon the fertilizer), which is assumed to have little immediate food value. By difference, it is easy to compute the so-called “reverted” acid, which is the portion insoluble in water but soluble in the citrate. The sum of the soluble and reverted is commonly called the “avail- able” phosphoric acid. (3) Potash soluble in water—most: of that present in green sand marl and crushed minerals, and even some of that present in vegetable materials such as cotton-seed meal, not being included because insoluble in water even after long boiling. (4) Nitrogen—This element is determined by a method which simply accounts for all present, without distinguishing between the quanti- ties present in the several forms of ammonium salts, nitrates or or- ganic matter. (5) Chlorin; this determination is made to afford a basis for estimating the proportion of the potash that is present as chlorid or muriate, the cheaper source. The computation is made on the assumption that the chlorin present, unless in excess, has been introduced in the form of muriate of potash; but doubtless there 4re occasional exceptions to this rule. One part of chlorin combines with 1.326 parts of potash to form the pure muriate; know- ing the chlorin, it is, therefore, easy to compute the potash equiva- lent thereto. (7) In the case of ground bone, the state of ‘sub-divi- sion is determined by sifting through accurately made sieves; the cost of preparation and especially the promptness of action of bone 43—7T—1906. 674 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. in the soil depends very largely on the fineness of its particles the finer being much more quickly useful to the plant. The law having required the manufacturer to guarantee the amount of certain valuable ingredients present in any brand he may put upon the market, chemical analysis is employed to verify the guaranties stamped upon the fertilizer sacks. It has, therefore, been deemed desirable in this report to enter the guaranty filed by the manufacturer in the office of the Secretary of Agriculture, in such connection with the analytical results that the two may be compared. An unfortunate practice has grown up among manu- facturers of so wording the guaranty that it seems to declare the presence in the goods of an amount of a valuable constituent rang- ing from a certain minimum to a much higher maximum; thus, “Pot- ash, 2 to 4 per cent.” is a guaranty not infrequently given. In real- ity, the sole guaranty is for 2 per cent. The guaranteed amounts given for each brand in the following tables, are copied from the guaranties filed by the maker of the goods with the Secretary of Agriculture, the lowest figure given for any constituent being con- sidered to be the amount guaranteed. For compactness and because no essentially important fact is suppressed thereby, the guaranties for soluble and reverted phosphoric acid have not been given sepa- rately, but are combined in a single guaranty for available phos- phoric acid; in cases where the maker’s guaranty does not specific- ally mention available phosphoric acid, the sum of the lowest figures given by him for soluble and reverted phosphoric acid is used. The law of 1879 allowed the maker to express his guaranty for nitro- gen either in terms of that element or in terms of the ammonia equivalent thereto; since ammonia is composed of three parts of hydrogen and fourteen parts of nitrogen, it is a very simple matter to calculate the amount of one, when the amount of the other is given; the amount of nitrogen multiplied by 1.214 will give the corresponding amount of ammonia, and the amount of ammonia multiplied by 0.824 will give the corresponding amount of nitrogen. In these tables, the expression is in terms of nitrogen. The law of 1901 abolishes this alternative and requires that the guaranty shall be given in terms of nitrogen. Many manufacturers after complying with the terms of the law, insert additional items in their guaranties, often with the result of misleading or confusing the buyer; the latter will do well to give heed to those items only that are given as the law requires and that are presented in these tables. A summary of the analyses made this season may be presented as follows: No. 7. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 675 Summary of Analyses Made This Season. a bs . 8 a — s ° ° = 8 e 3 Fi 2 e 2 2 e 5 = Us} Es} F »~ ao ao 2 : 2 12 = a ad ° ° 5 £ S) 4 a r) = fe} = ZS & Oo em) A A 5 Wamber Oe, RUBTVSES in 5. ciesisaiclciniclsinietainin iste isisioir c\s‘elaieiaicia’s 266 71 7 43 u BROS re.) (DETs CONE, wc cecmrede cree te coececiew nae wcloes neces 10.10 10.66 7.92 9.86 4.78 Phosphoric acid: ROCA) eT CONE: sae stats daiomteieie stones ole otalvialeis's,« wlsis’s an'eciniwe winds caeiicietomiontomenticmtecs wieice caeee ae 676 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. The cases of deficiency noted during the past ten seasons in goods as compared with their guaranties expressed in percentage of the total number of goods of each class analyzed, are as follows: Percentage of Deficiency 1902-1906. ai 3 ao Sie dae ane es Ss = g aS § > = (2) oS Q, a ic mn Complete fertilizers,.. 40.0 36.7 Bi Dissolved bone, ...... *100.0 60.0 33.3 Rock and potash, ..... 30.3 43.5 32.9 Dissolved rock, ....... 15,2 8.9 23.2 Ground bone, .......... 17.2 25.0 33.3 All classes except mis- cellaneous, ........... 34.2 33.2 35.1 *Only two samples analyzed. Only two samples analyzed for which no guarantees are reported. Fall, 1903. , 1904, Spring Fall, 1904. tOnly two samples analyzed for which guarantees are recorded, Fall, 1905. 1906. Spring, s Suess ~ SOR oR ‘ SRoBEs Fall, 1906. eo NAS i) oo INOS: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 677 A comparison of the average composition of all samples of com- plete fertilizers for which guaranties are recorded with the aver- age of the corresponding guaranties, for several seasons past includ- ing those of this season follows: Average Composition and Guaranty Compared. Se ee Spring, 19€2. Phosphorie acid: RYO CELL 0 sala otc cleiv vlaieic tole mieisieieis//e,cleiic(e/ais\e aialelatelainialel oete(eYalojs/efeiaisialalateinlal= eistale]o(e)e\=)sieinia)ein/n\e\o\e\xiv\eiaisic Available, iIPotashy eccen INUELOBE™|N, — oiereio10 cio. a wisioicicie wie cee nes onicee islet vlaisivis os s\viniv.eis wicirivinis «init divie viele vine vielsin's olsisisia\s sinle Phosphoric acid: IREAN I cereiwin ciate wavsicloleinls(otel nis ieeccrvietelatelevelaro\a:aleteiemalol tala n cletatstaleleteteatsterojeicrattcetatelotareielsietea tietetelisy PACA APLE) i ciere ereicreiatolele clesoiavelarate eve siotetolatalafeielstatatepetatoteinibtetert talalstelAateielaletelejeyaistalelaleleiststotaieletelotoistot« LOE ASI E i fete onl tol\ctoteiajatols)ote\cloJelsle!eielele elele\cte/® che’ ol eln\ateteln =f=(alnias/e\a(els/af=}tolsteletais[oter=)=(ola lia! sta]-tate[-¥e\=1=1o7a)ssla/n= ASREROE CTS Wl ote Seicinnicioe cite cicielempnictelolotere mle otele a rial tole/ ator ctetaleysbaleloteveta ts ata)etstetetetel ate teyatalelote tate varelaaietar-lateestet= Spring, 1903. Phosphoric acid: U TRO EAN i crotle ciate eveteteiavessiaeteleteToptaietete’steveleieretererniciarareiintsindiatn claialettete oversee tecstettersisterelainictctcreh ere cotati | DAG ATP ATI Cs arerereiste ceieieeteleie ol ieietetersin lets iaieisielelsialeleloleiatstvin/sleteleleisjetawelolorela atalclevere alntei=lalaielelaiain stelalaietste TROUEKI Em BA ganoOdonnaDaee uenoodDoo ad naoDn SoD O00 ap onde oper hooduosoacodbhocub dscoDaTo0eebpandds SINTER CES CUM ey a eter teresa ele eisai eetol ele ateter ove Tale rotanetehed otele toi fotolatetel alain leletelols etal stalatewetetstateteteletaietetetetat=|afet-taisters Phosphoric acid: MBE A 8 Fas yan icra tate ters epee niain emcee saa niobate eicialettatetatiare ae ele inteloratetelasrevatas\e'sloictalovsiatefaca eres vla/cPefainle MS PIIBV AE. acosabtecconoonc opmagouncobbaco sn. Conn cogguat dasa deDedocvopUodOOmECeMSOODaD | PSO EAST he cca iateetae arate oie sheralo aie leltctate oe eeia nieinelooin oleic inialeteicieieetsinie eicieve ial metalorstetsieialsieierajeleies siemieiarcie NUR UE OSes fatereleteta chore = totelelslarereralennioyers/erey eteteraisreieieteicteralovala chelate totevereforefetatstersiavsYelepelelatemtetetetlacsisistsratevate Gite Phosphorie acid: Avsigl es ébaneodedsodedacoo cons noabuacon coducndcunoUpuobsdobaLe GabonooBodapubdascucsnon Available, TeGiziny Gocsonoo EERO E CR on teres elaaloyetaaiteisterele alate eleieteicie aieetererniiera lalaie’a «\elare ctor eVotale)e ata atalatoren« eile orsieieyetstevalalaisiclauatereiaate Phosphoric acid: Nitrogen, : Phosphoric acid: EUG EAN eo rapaare elais «\n\ololaiaierasalacatttar stata atetetlerel v1 oicte ate eicistebet ciaictat eel ei slahepayaiecai tess: Dee Ho ab eeme eB OnCn eae reste Odnab JOC conc ba srroarEe Chambersburg IVE PES (Coma so IME. De Sei le are) 2: ara iss eie oreis mimto nye Wlodes ere rehatoN efinyndittolistaliain) myeiaial eet aotate Westgrove Gabriel WeSter . o<.e = stereo oletdie eieiet«'o) sie! wio's)aloininlt nlnleliefetolefatelsioleialsiels! » \njolore aielaje m n\ererecsrete HAYWARD, HARRY, Pork production in) the Hast, 2.2... ccscccsssecccccmpatics HERR, J. D:, The problem: of the small orchardist, 22-2. .s.e0. .ccccsessecceseses HOARD: HON. W. Ds. Some things Oncaairy LAMA (calee in cctctelssicleicicleieisjeielelr ete HOPKINS, PROF. CYRIL G., Land ruin compared with soil improvement, HUNT, PROF. THOMAS F., The promotion of agriculture in Pennsylvania, Horticulture. and’ forestry in) Pennsylvania, (ccc cae iotelasiai (es cloisjalntarmiattimtaitahsicae 525 SOBER, Cl (Rey Chestrrts crm err ye reteesstareiera cielo oe) ael0)s\slnieclolelatclai=ia/ai-Yeleiainioinie\e\ fais’ stelelinieietens = 4 530 STOUT, W. H., Geology as it relates G agriculture, 470 SURFACE, PROF. H. A. (Economic Zoologist): Jean (lee ASA Goda CAL Occ odecmor CO DONC OUOnECCOCrCdOSaod sate sane nacre Sn00aK Apbacdena nAccceeo esos an 138 INV SEIS A BION Mesicrare aietele esintele a’ ino is oleic jezn'n\nie icin Sieraiaiaieiersiarelielereaisieiei sis aieasietteteiaatet ene teleret te tare faicicieiasisactae 139 leo teena ace! Saehoeecacscmnaoneoe och relata aries ere stntdwie ia (eleleletaroisiete stoene raat ation sce Dipeisierelalo © eisjaiare in we eetate 142 Inspection of nurseries and orchards, 143 IAT Ee COMPECEIOUS N voinisic,ate alslaaiaisieleiainre o(dlela\ajavsie/eis, cicieiarecrialeteieintaietoietsteis (eters lcrein cislelale clatareteiateisia/ evel cscteretasiar ie 5 151 WV SMIOVISERALIOMS A ie cle als) cin'elarc)e\s\njetetate nporeie lac atelotstataiote icin isictejeieisieielslslotela cists heisintaei ste. oielaielclaietaatciaieteite min stale aia 152 GEST AMGMMODEY 7 — clajsialetsisse's oleivia ts oyolets so clsivistel cietaralevaleta terete tale lottloiatolerscerelelercietelste 261 Report of Ornithologist, 383 Report of Entomologist, 435 Development) in “scale: TEMEAIES,, %.cacjcac sinc sciacleeeaeleewasemer 545 T: - TAY LOR, ©: S:,-Report: on wool) ‘and (cotton fibressarecpictteceteeeli = «isis cn = «1001s 10,ceielais > Sistas 365 TOWER, DR. E. E., Anatomy, CO ee care and treatment of farm erin sisideras 182 Report on live stock, ......... dapdad siatolele/ahnseinlaletatsiee tetera ateteteietmtety alotateiaies'e/o;ore\eiele/s\ sesaeemniisins Oe aaemisie oovieees Pork productionyinsthe Hast) s..es.... 62-6 Pork husbandry, profits of, Poultry husbandry, Poultry, houses for, Poultry, breeding of, opportunities of Pennsyl- Society, Rabies, Report Report Report Report Report Report Report of Secretary, Geacsecusc HSDOOCOORCIOnO of Deputy Secretary, ...50.3...-0008 of Dairy and Food Commissioner, of State Veterinarian, of Economic Zoologist, of Botanist, : on live stock, EeportrOfmePomologistsu «assess sen cece eae Report of Committee on Credentials, Report on apiary, ey 27 143 SS ee SS Sacyx_] ——— eee ee eter eee eee eeee ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Off. Doc. Page. Report on wool and cotton fibres, ......... 365 Report of Hygienist, .........ce.ceceeeeecees - 7 Sah Report of Ornithologist, ...... Rata aicieratnistafsters esse Report* on poultry, .scccceccnccceees Sisetelsieipie 358 Report on fertilizers, ........---.-seees kiceie OE Report on dairy legislation, .............. 423 Report on cereals, .......cceeecceeeccceccrces 427 Report of Veterinarian to Poard of Ag- FICWLUUITE, win. acne cae ce ne nee eserogbagotean: 430 Report On TORS; .co.selsiecte Melaet se yeciot wesw elas Report of Entomologist, .......... wdexitae omen aanl Report on dairy products, ............++. 449 Report on feeding stuffs, ..............---- . 442 Report on identification of fruits, ...... 465 Report of Mineralogist, .....-...--ss-.-e8 466 Report on legislation, ............-.s.- rode ee Al Resolutions, report of Committee on, .... 292 Ss. Scale remedies, development in, .........- 545 Seale remedies, spraying material, ..,.... 562 Schools of agriculture, ........ccceccsseees . 680 Seed and how to obtain that which is ZOOM se feierese oialere metaferereaciaia wlele/eiavern aceicriavels sas Scteie eee oO Seed, analyses of clover, 207 Seed, adulterated, ........ 210 Seed, imported, i... 0... Lest Srtecaratelerets auisece one peLe Seed legislation, .........cseccsccsesccess ec ee Sheep husbandry, importance of, ........ - 604 Sheep husbandry, the raising of lambs,.. 605 Soil nitrogen, accumulations of, .......... 215 Soil, improvement of, ........ssesseeoee 231 Soil, deficiencies in, ............. Balsietelcietere a elaueeyeates Soil, application of plant life to, ..... node re Soil, rotation of crops to, ....... pi asclenememreed Soil, humus-making material for, ....... 238 Soil, practical methods for improving, .. 239 Soil and crushed limestone, .....+..-s+eees 407 State Board of Agriculture, proceedings of spring meeting, .........+ Stace tetoiwle's sie siet=(alataceta 155 State Board of Agriculture, minutes.of,.. 157 State Board of Agriculture, annual meet- ANP OL, © ercteieice ale lelarcinia\alelele[elnietminiate =tesptare snocic Seems Stute Board of Agriculture, officers and MMLETMIDETE SOL ossicles ata eiateteyalel= Saale ontste Van iasd State Board of Agriculture, proceedings of annual meeting, .........--eseeeees ewteetar TO State Horticultural Association, proceed- ings and officers Of, ........-seeeeeeees i 485 State Horticultural Association, report of General Fruit Committee, .......... beeerig cbt) State Horticultural Association, address Of ‘President, © .<..scvscueene stiles ci lela(sleerete 493 State Livestock Sanitary Board, work of, 103 State Livestock Sanitary Board, the ex- perimental farm, ............ EB Setuidisicsis Scie rejote,, aM! TS Texas fever, .......+.. moaenhic wen clenicsiosk cows 110 Tuberculosis of cattle, ............eeeeee eens 117 Tuberculosis of cattle, vaccination GEAINSE, wen ceiacess sreisieieleie(esiata Sadeandserive scare ave Veterinarian, Report of, ..... donueaG scenacn) eae nu Veterinary schools, value to the Nation,.. 182 Veterinary education, relation to animal history, .:.-- Soe Mean des to ede beeee saiee aieene TOUS Veterinary education, value of, ........... @14 ‘ Z. Zoologist, Report of, ........ a i aeisiels se Saeed Raee. work of Division, 138 Zoology, 3 5185 00258 5659 Y § ee iB ; AMS yee