UMASS/ AMHERST 315Dbb D2flS ISTS S TWELFTH ANNUAL UEPORT OF THE SECllETARY OF THE P[as5ac|nsftts §0arb 0f ^gncullitrt, TOGETHER WITH REPORTS OE COMMITTEES APPOINTED TO VISIT T^E COUNTY SOCIETIES, WITH A]^ APPEI^DIX CONTAINING AN ABSTEA.CT OF THE FINANCES OF THE COUNTY SOCIETIES FOB 18 6 4. BOSTON: WRIGHT & POTTER, STATE PRINTERS, No. 4 Spring Lane. 186 5. 4^ :-Jtt STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. 1865. MEMBERS EX OFFICIIS. His Excellency JOHN A. ANDREW. His Honor JOEL HAYDEN. Hon. OLIVER WARNER, Secretary of the Commonwealth. APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR AND COUNCIL. Term expires. EPHRAIM W. BULL, of Concord, 1866 LOUIS AGASSIZ, of Cambridcje, 1867 PAUL A. CHADBOURNE, of Williamstown, 18G8 CHOSEN BY THE COUNTY SOCIETIES. Massachusetts, LEVERETT SALTONSTALL, of Newton, 1868 i:ssex GEORGE B. LORING, of Salem, . . 1866 . 1867 . 1868 . 1866 . 1866 . 1866 . 1866 Middlesex, JOHN B. MOORE, of Concord, Middlesex North, .... ASA CLEMENT, of Dracut, Middlesex South, .... ELIAS GROUT, of Ashland, . Worcester, HENRY R. KEITH, of Grafton, Woi-cester West, .... HOLLIS TIDD, of New Braintree, Worcester North, .... ABEL F. ADAMS, of Fitchburg, Worcester South, .... NEWTON S. HUBBARD, of Brimfield, . 1868 Worcester South-East, . . . VELOROUS TAFT, of Upton, . . . 1867 Hampshire, Franklin and Hampden, . THEO. G. HUNTINGTON, of Hadley, . 1867 Hampshire, LEVI STOCKBRIDGE, of North Hadley, 1868 Highland, MATTHEW SMITH, of Middlefield, . 1866 Hampden, PHINEAS STEDMAN, of Chicopee, . . 1867 Hampden East, ALURED HOMER, of Brimfield, . . 1867 Franklin, JOHN M. SMITH, of Sunderland, . . 1868 Berkshire, CHARLES 0. PERKINS, of Becket, . 1867 Hoosac Valley SYLVANDER JOHNSON, of Adams, . 1867 Honsatonic, HARRISON GARFIELD, of Lee, . . 1867 Norfolk, CHARLES C. SEW ALL, of Medfield, . 1868 Bristol, SAMUEL L. CROCKER, of Taunton, . 1866 riymouih, CHARLES G. DAVIS, of Plymouth, . 1866 Barnstable, JOHN KENRICK, of Orleans, . . . 1868 Nantucket, ...,,. JAMES THOMPSON, of Nantucket, . 1866 Martha's Vineyard, .... DANIEL A. CLEAVELAND, of Tisbury, 1868 CHARLES L. FLINT, Secretary. TWELFTH ANNUAL REPOUT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. To the Senate and House of Representatives of the Common- ivealth of Massachusetts : Notwithstanding the high price of labor during the past season, and an excessive drought almost unparallelled in the history of our agriculture, the year has, as a "whole, been one of great prosperity for the farming interests of the Commonwealth. The war, so disastrous in many respects, having led to the dis- arrangement of the system of labor in the border States and throughout large sections of territory in other parts of the country, has stimulated the production of some of the crops over which those sections had, to some extent, a monopoly, and thrown whatever advantage that monopoly possessed into the hands of our own farmers. Rapid changes have taken place, therefore, in our own crops, as statistics will show, and these changes wall be more apparent in the returns of the past year than in those of any year previous. The area devoted to broom corn has been much less than heretofore, and that devoted to tobacco vastly increased. The high price of wool has had the effect to multiply the number of sheep in the State, and thus that most profitable branch of farming has been been stimulated to a greater degree than ever before. The law for the protection of sheep against 6 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. dogs has been enforced with apparent good will, and though the number of sheep is still far less than it should and must of necessity be in every profitable system of farming, the enthu- siasm for sheep husbandry has received such an impulse that a revolution in this respect may be said to have begun. Nor is the change in our farming less apparent in the largely increased application of machinery and labor-saving implements to all the operations on the farm. The introduction of the larger and more expensive machines is naturally rather slow. Men require time to observe and consider them. But the last year or two has witnessed the progress in this department which, under ordinary circumstances, would hardly be ex- pected in ten. The hay tedder, for example, has gained as strong a hold upon the attention of practical farmers in the last two years as it would in other times have gained in a much longer time, and the same may be said of other important machines. The result has been to stimulate mechanical inge- nuity and to increase production with a less amount of wearing physical labor. The manufacture and application of concentrated manures has also been largely on the increase in certain sections of the State, while greater system in making and economizing stable manures has been more widely introduced, and the buying and feeding of store cattle or sheep for the winter, mainly for the sake of their manure, which, before the war, was confined to a few, has become by no means uncommon in those portions of the State where the want of manure has been mostly seriously felt. When the price of ordinary farm-yard manure rises to ten dollars a cord and more in a district remote from market,' it becomes a pretty strong incentive to effort and economy in its production. Another evidence of increased enterprise and activity among the farming population of the State, may be seen in the largely increased numbers in attendance at the county fairs in all parts of the Commonwealth. So far as my observation has extended, these fairs were never, as a whole, so fully patronized by the public as during the past year. On one of the days of the New England Fair at Springfield no less than twenty-two thousand people were in attendance. On another day, which opened wet SECRETARY'S UEPORT. 7 and lowering, eighteen thousand, and the same enthusiasm has been manifested at many of the smaller fairs. Another significant evidence of a greater spirit of inquiry in the minds of farmers is the largely increased demand for the reports of the State Board of Agriculture. With an edition of ten thousand copies, double the number printed ten years ago, it is wholly impossible to supply the call for them, and hardly two months pass after tliey are ready for distribution before the number is exhausted and the distribution is obliged to be stopped. With very few exceptions, these reports now go into the hands of practical farmers, and they are unquestionably read by them to a far greater extent than formerly. But with these and other evidences of general prosperity, enterprise and inquiry, I am sorry to be compelled to report that that fatal and dangerous disease among our horned cattle, commonly called pleuro-pneumonia, is still in existence, and requires constant watching by a competent and vigilant commission. The report of the Board of Commissioners on Contagious Diseases among Cattle, is as follows : To the Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonweallh of Massa- chusetts : In accordance with the law of 1860, relating to contagious diseases among cattle, the following Report is respectfully submitted : — April 20th. Charles P. Preston of Danvers, and E. F. Thayer of (West) Newton, were appointed to fill the vacancies existing in the Board of Cattle Commissioners. The Commissioners have been called to visit nineteen towns, and to examine the cattle of thirty different herds during the past eight months. In six only was the disease called pleuro- pneumonia found to exist, viz. : in one herd in the towns respectively of Lincoln, Ashby and Boxborough, in two herds in Lexington, and in the herd belonging to the city of Boston at Deer Island. A herd of cattle belonging to John P. Reed, of Lexington, had been isolated, by order of the selectmen, and a few days before May 1st was discharged by them from further isolation. The cattle were carefully examined, and no disease was found to exist among them. 8 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. The Commissioners were also notified that there were sick cattle at the barn of Martin Beatty in Lexington. On examina- tion, an ox (the mate had been killed by order of the selectmen,) and a cow with diseased lungs were found. Isolation of the whole herd was continued until June 16th, when, in company with the recently appointed Commissioner, F. D. Lincoln, Esq., of Brimfield, the herd was again examined. No evidence of disease was apparent, excepting in the two above mentioned, both of which were diseased to an extent that would not justify the return of the animals to the owners. Accordingly, both were slaughtered. The autopsy of the ox showed that the lower portion of the right lung adherent to the ribs, a diseased mass of lung tissue, was encysted and floating in pus. In the cow, the left lung was diseased ; otherwise, the condition was similar to that of the ox. From the history of the cases, and the pathological appear- ance, it was evident that the disease in both animals was of long standing, and as no other cases occurred, the remainder of the herd were released from further isolation. On the 10th of May the Commissioners received a notice from the selectmen of Lincoln that the disease existed in the herd of George Nelson, and that the animals were kept isolated by their order. Two cows had died, one on the 17th of March, the other on the 4th of May ; several others had been sick, and were much emaci- ated. Genei'ous diet was ordered and isolation continued. On the 27th, one of the cows, being greatly emaciated and evidently much diseased, was killed. A considerable mass of disease was found in the right lung ; the formation of pus had commenced. The herd was kept isolated until August 3d, when three were selected as having diseased lungs, and a fourth did not thrive. It was decided to have the four slaughtered. The autopsies justified the decision in the three ; the fourth was healthy. June 3d. The Commissioners visited the farm of Levi Smith in Ashby. One of a pair of oxen purchased in Marlow, N. H., and kept in the Box Tavern stable, in Stoddard, on the night of the 24th of March was found sick, the right lung being exten- sively diseased. The autopsy disclosed the right lung wholly consolidated, and weighing, by lestimate, at least twenty-five pounds. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 9 Mr. Smith was confident that his herd would not take the disease, as the ox was removed soon after the sickness commenced. On the 2d of July, nearly every animal was sick. Two were selected for experiment ; the remainder were slaughtered on the 3d of August, and all but one were diseased. July 15th. At Boxborough the Commissioners found two cows isolated by order of the selectmen, one of which showed symptoms of lung disease ; the remainder of the herd had been turned to pasture, consequently were not in fit condition for examination. On the 29th, on examination, all were found healthy, except- ing the one sick at the former visit, which had died, and been buried several days. The body was exhumed, and the right lung was found to be diseased with contagious pleuro-pneumonia, so called. Early in May, the Commissioners were requested to examine the herd of T. E. Cutter, in Lexington. Upon examination, all appeared healthy. The owner being a,bsent at the time, no information could be elicited. In June, it being again intimated that a disease existed among his cattle, another examination took place, by appointment, July 1st. Several chronic cases were found, and it was ordered tliat the herd be isolated. Mr. Cutter stated that he had already lost eleven head of cattle, the first one dying in March, and there being no case of sickness for several weeks, it was hoped the remainder would escape ; but on the 21st, one of the most severe cases was found ; in fact the animal could not long survive. It was then decided to have the herd slaughtered. On examination, eiglit were diseased and five were healthy. The Commissioners were next called to examine a herd of - cattle at Deer Island, belonging to the city of Boston. Five had been killed, by the order of the directors of the institution there, before the appraisal of the herd was made. It consisted of forty-one head, many of them valuable. Eleven heavy oxen being among the number, seven were selected for experiment ; thirty-four were slaughtered, seventeen proved healthy and seventeen diseased. Thirteen hundred and thirty-eight dollars and fifty-three cents ($1,338.53,) was realized from the sale of 2* 10 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. the beef, &c., of the healthy animals, and applied in part payment of the appraised value of the cattle. The conclusions to which the Commissioners have arrived from their investigations the past year, are that if a herd of cattle is surely exposed by being in contact with an animal in the early stage of the disease, (as, for instance, in an ordinary barn, as cattle are usually tied up,) slaughtering the herd and selling the healthy for beef is the most economical mode of treating it ; but if the exposure is doubtful, isolation, with care- ful watching, should be resorted to. Facts, with the figures to substantiate the above, can be produced, but it is thought unnecessary. It is often asked, " Why kill the diseased ? Why not let them recover ?" In answer, it is proper, first, to explain what recovery of the disease called pleuro-pneumonia is. To illustrate : suppose, with one-half or two-thirds of one lung solidified, the first effort of nature is to throw around the diseased mass a covering of fibrinous material, entirely shutting off the healthy tissue from the diseased, which is generally accomplished in from fifteen to forty days. Suppuration then commences on the surface of the diseased mass, which continues until the whole is liquified ; absorption is constantly going on, and in from six to twenty months the animal recovers, but with the loss of a portion of a vital organ. If the animal is a work- ing bullock, its value is destroyed ; if a cow in milk, after the acute stage is passed, the secretation is partly restored, and the milk consumed by the people. Would an intelligent and conscientious physician recommend for a wet nurse a person with an abscess or abscesses in the lungs ? If not, why is it not equally wrong to use the milk drawn from cows with lungs in the same or a similar condition ? < Contagion. — In the first three herds to which the Commis- sioners were called, it is not probable that contact with diseased animals could be proved. Several months had elapsed since the disease broke out, and as it was in a locality where it was well known that the disease existed the year previous, it is not strange that the efforts made to trace it failed. The statements made to the Commissioners in relation to the outbreak and SECRETARY'S REPORT. 11 spread of the disease in and from Ashby are so conclusive that it seems proper to put them in tliis Report. The pair of oxen kept at the Box Tavern stable over night on the 24th of March, as before stated, were driven to the farm of Levi Smith, in Ashby. Eighty-six days after, one of the herd of Mr. Smith was attacked. A bull belonging to another party was kept at the farm at the time the ox was taken sick. A few days after, the owner sold him, and he was driven to Sharon, N. H., where, after exposing two herds, he died, as did several animals so exposed in these herds. Much has been said about the disease being generated by bad ventilation. Unless the mountain pastures in New Hampshire, the hills of Ashby, the large, clean barns, (the doors of which had not been shut for months before the disease broke out,) and the hills and valleys of Deer Island require better ventilation, the theory that the disease is caused by bad ventilation must be abandoned. The Commissioners visited New Hampshire to learn if the reports were true that the disease had broken out in pastures in that State. On arrival at Peterborough, information was received that a board of cattle commissioners had been appoinl^ed by the governor and council, and that Albert G. Scott, Esq., a resident of that town, was a member, who stated that the reports were too true, and much alarm existed among the farmers of that section. On the following day, by invitation of the New Hampshire commissioners, several herds were examined in Hancock and Peterborough. Two animals were selected and slaughtered. The autopsies proved that it was the same disease as in Massachusetts. An arrangement was made with the New Hampshire commissioners, that no cattle affected with pleuro- pneumonia should be allowed to go to Massachusetts, or that cattle which had been exposed in pastures where the disease had existed, or in adjoining pastures, should not be transported otherwise than by railroad, and on arrival in this State to be sold for beef, thereby protecting the farmers on the line of road usually travelled in both States, and preventing the spread of the disease in the localities where the cattle were owned. Much credit is due the New Hampshire Commissioners for their energetic and faithful co-operation in the endeavor to prevent the spread of the disease in their own State and in 12 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. enforcing such rules as would tend to keep it from endangering the herds of neighboring States. Indeed, it appeared to the Commissioners that far less apathy in relation to a matter so serious and vital prevailed in New Hampshire than in many portions of our own State. It is easy for newspaper writers to hold up any subject to ridicule, and for careless and unobservant persons to sneer at what they do not understand ; but it remains, nevertheless, true that no one has seriously and candidly examined into the character of this disease, no matter what their preconceived notions and opinions, who have not been forced to confess that no measures for its eradication or its prevention should be left untried, nor any care or attention intermitted that may possibly arrest this scourge to farmers, and this fountain of disease to ou'r people. By order of the honorable council, the Commissioners were " requested to cause such cattle as may be infected, or which have been exposed to infection, with pleuro-pneumonia, to be isolated, to determine the question of the contagiousness and curability of the disease ; also, whether for the purpose of work- ing, milking or breeding they have been injured, and to what extent they h^ve been injured by exposure to disease, or by having had the disease ; and also to ascertain, by slaughtering .them at a sufficiently remote period, whether, and to what extent, their fattening qualities have been injured." As the experiments instituted are not concluded, the result will appear in a future report. The amount of bills audited, exclusive of the various suras to which the several towns are liable, is thirty-eight hundred and seventy-five dollars and ten cents, (13,875.10,) and by estimate, it will require twenty-five hundred dollars to pay the outstand- ing bills, making the total sum expended nearly six thousand four hundred dollars, (!|6,400.) Respectfully submitted. E. F. Thayer, Chas. p. Preston, « Commissioners. To the Senate and House of Representatives : — Gentlemen, — Having received the appointment as Commis- sioner on Contagious Diseases of Cattle, and not being able to subscribe to the Report which the Board of Commissioners SECRETARY'S REPORT. ■ 13 have seen fit to present, I beg leave to submit the following as a Minority Report : — All must admit the importance of arriving at a correct con- clusion in relation to the disease existing among the cattle of the New England States, known as plcuro-pneumonia. For if what is so generally said by those who have had the better opportunity to examine the subject be true', viz., that the future value of the neat stock in this country depends upon the vigilance used to check the spread of the disease by the destruction of the cattle having the disease, or having been exposed to the same, it is certainly difficult to calculate the importance of vigilant action in this direction. If, on the other hand, it be true that all that is necessary is to use the care and precaution used in the treatment of other diseases, then the course which has been thus far pursued by this Commonwealth can be viewed in no other light than that of an unwarrantable waste of property, which if followed may involve the loss of many millions of dollars. I suppose it not far from a just estimate to put the amount expended by the State, and the loss suffered by indi- viduals to the present time at two hundred thousand dollars, ($200,000 ;) and when or where this expenditure is to cease, no prudent man will venture an opinion. Two years ago the Commissioners announced that they were happy to be able to say that no case then existed in the State that they were aware of, and the public were led to believe that they were finally relieved of the terrible scourge ; and yet there have been since that time more than a hundred cases ! Had the present Board been called upon to make their Report two months since, I doubt not they would have been happy in trying to quiet the fears of any of the timid. All at once there breaks out on Deer Island, in one of the better herds, if not the best one in the State, as bad a case as has come under their observation during the season. Believing that a just conclusion as to the proper course to be pursued can only be arrived at by a careful consideration of the facts bearing on the following questions, viz, : Is the disease contagious ? if so, to what extent ? Is it curable ? To what extent is it fatal ? Are the animals affected with the disease worth keeping through a common course of it, either for fatten- 14 . BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. ing, milking, breeding, or working purposes ? I present the following as all the facts I have been able to obtain. The first case I was called upon to visit was that of a herd belonging to Martin Beatty, of Lexington, containing thirteen or fourteen head, made up ofcows and young cattle. This herd had been isolated some time previous by the order of the select- men. The Commissioners had continued the isolation, and had, previous to ray meeting with them, agreed to kill one cow belonging to Mr. Beatty, and an ox which had been kept for some time in the barn with the diseased cow, owned by Carroll & Nevils. Both of these animals had been in a low condition, but for two weeks or more had gained in flesh rapidly. An examination proved that each had what is called contagious pleuro-pneumonia. That they would have fattened readily was believed on all hands, and their improvement for the two weeks previous to their being killed seem(^d to warrant that conclu- sion. Where either of these got the disease, we could not learn. The cow was kept with the rest of the herd, (thirteen, I think, in number,) till some days after she showed that she had the disease, probably till after the time it is generally supposed those affected with contagious pleuro-pneumonia will communicate it to others, and yet no one of the herd with which she was kept had the disease that we are aware of; and perhaps it is proper to state that we kept the remainder of the herd isolated for some time, and Dr. Thayer made a number of examinations before we thought it prudent to take off the restriction. The herd of Levi Smith of Ashby was the next I visited, from which any facts were elicited that bear upon the questions under consideration. Smith had a herd consisting of eight cows, two bulls, and a calf. There had been kept a pair of oxen belonging to one Willard with this stock, which oxen were purchased in Marlow, N. H., and were kept one night at the Box Tavern with some other cattle which were supposed to have pleuro-pneumonia. I say supposed because no evidence came before us that any one who had any knowledge of the disease had ever examined them, and had it not been for the breaking out of the disease in Smith's herd probably none would have suspected the cattle at the Box Tavern. Some forty days after the above supposed exposure, one of these oxen was taken sick. Dr. Thayer and Mr. Preston had the yoke appraised, killed the SECRETARY'S RERORT. 15 sick one and found that he had pleuro-pneumonia. The other ox was taken to Brighton, where he afterwards died, but an examination showed to Dr. Thayer's satisfaction, that lie had never had the above-named disease. Some two weeks after the ox was killed, the Commissioners were called to Mr. Smith's again and found one of the cows quite sick. We had the whole herd appraised, killed the sick cow, (she had pleuro-pneumonia,) ordered Mr. Smith to isolate his herd by building a double fence on the side of his pasture where other herds were kept. One of Smith's bulls had been with the cows of Mr. Asa Walker till it showed symptoms of the disease, coughing and the like, and the Board directed these cows to be kept isolated. On the fourth of July two of Smith's cows were brought to Newtonville to be placed with four cows brought from Maine to try the effects of an exposure ; both these cows were killed on the thirteenth of July and found to have had the pleuro-pneumonia. Of the experiment I shall speak hereafter. The remainder of Smith's herd was killed in August ; all except one cow and the calf were diseased. What this herd would have been worth to have kept it of course would be presumptuous to say, for there was no pains taken with the milking; the calf which was nearly three months old went with, and of course drew his food from, as many of them and at such times as inclination led him thereto. Smith consid- ered the milk of no value except to feed swine upon, and the cows were from all these reasons used in such a manner as would have ruined any cows for the season. It should be noted that the calf both before and after being killed had the appear- ance of having been perfectly healthy ; also that the neighbors' cows that were exposed to Smith's bull, six and probably nine in number, have never shown any signs of disease ; and further that a bull that was kept at Smith's place for some time after the ox was taken sick, is said to have died in about ten days after being taken away, having given the disease to each of the herds with which he came in contact in Sharon, N. H. What reliance is to be be placed on this story is for others to decide ; I record it as it was told. Smith says in relation to this bull that he never came in contact with the sick ox, nor with any other of the sick cattle of his herd. It is conceded that no one of the above- named herd would have died of the disease except the ox first taken and the cow that was killed on the 2od of June, nor was 16 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. it thought by Dr. Thayer that she would have died but for the presence of a quantity of masticated grass found in the bronchial tubes. This is the only case to wliich we have been called where we were able to trace even a probable connection between the disease found, and any other herd. It is for others to judge how conclusive the evidence in this case is. George Nelson, of Lincoln, had a herd of about twelve head, which were isolated by the selectmen, and turned over by them to the care of the Commissioners. Two of the cows had died, and one was sick at the time Dr. Thayer and Mr. Preston first visited the place. By their order the herd was appraised, and kept isolated ; the sick cow was killed, and found to have had pleuro- pneumonia. Dr. Thayer visited the herd several times, and examined it carefully. On the. 29th of June the Board, by his advice, returned to Mr. Nelson all his herd but three cows ; but on a subsequent visit it was decided to take one other cow with these three, and have them slaughtered in Brighton. Three of these cows showed the effects of diseased lungs, the other was perfectly sound ; in one, the lung on one side was nearly wasted, there being not more tli an ^one-third of its proper size left, and that a hard lump adhering firmly to the ribs. I do not hesitate to say that had either of these animals belonged to me, and been fat, I should have used the meat for food, without apprehending any injurious effects therefrom. So I think most of the farmers in this Commonwealth would have done. That they would have fattened readily, all the testimony that has come before us goes to prove ; indeed, much of it is to the effect that cattle after passing the acute stage of the disease, fatten more readily for having had it. I deem it proper to take more particular notice of Nelson's herd, because I have so often heard it mentioned as furnishing evidence sufficient to prove that cows affected with pleuro-pneumonia are not worth keeping for milking purposes. The facts in the case are simply these : From the time the Commissioners took possession of Nelson's cows till they were returned to him, and the four cows killed, he took care of them for the State, charging for his trouble and whatever it cost to feed them, on grass, hay, and meal, giving the State credit for what so much of the milk as was deemed fit to sell SECRETARY'S REPORT. 17 brought ; and the result was that the cost of keeping was much more than was realized from the sale of the milk. Now, with out going into an argument as to whether herds of cows would generally, if kept in this manner, pay for their keeping, leaving out of the account the value of the manure, it is sufficient in this case to state the facts, that Nelson said, repeatedly, that the cows, for some reason, gave but little milk ; that he could see no difference in them in this respect. Dr. Thayer examined them again and again, and could detect no trace of the disease in but four, and in one of these he detected it where it did not exist. To state the case in a different form : three of the nine cows, (I think there were nine left after killing the first one,) had pleuro-pneumonia. None of them paid for their keeping ; er^o, cows that have the pleuro-pneumonia are not worth keep- ing ! So easily do men become the dupes of their own preju- dices ! To such ridiculous shifts as these are men driven who have a theory to maintain which they deem of vital importance ! It may be said that perhaps the remainder of the herd had the disease ; but one of them, at least, did not have it, and the evidence is, that no difference existed among the herd as to the falling off in the milk. Not a little excitement existed in Lexington in regard to a lierd belonging to T. E. Cutter, from which several cows had died during the spring and summer. The Commissioners had the herd isolated, and at a subsequent visit one of the cows was found to be very sick. It was thought best to have the whole herd, consisting of thirteen cows and a bull, appraised and killed at Brighton, where the meat of the healthy portion could be readily disposed of. All but four of the number proved to have had the disease. The only facts I deem it worth recording here in relation to Cutter's herd are, that Cutter declared that neither of the cattle killed at Brighton had ever shown to him any symptoms of the disease, though he had watched them closely, and had had that experience which having the disease in his herd six or eight months would give ; and that he did not men- tion as a fact that the cows did not pay for their keeping, but on the contrary, complained of the loss he should suffer by being deprived of the milk of so good a herd. Let it be borne in mind, that eight of this herd had had the pleuro-pneumonia for months. 3* 18 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. July 15th we visited the herd of Oliver Meade, of Boxborougli, consisting of two cows, and some dozen young cattle. Meade had lost two cows, and the selectmen had compelled him to shut up in his barn the remaining two. On inquiry it was found that one of these cows and a two-year old had been purchased of his brother, who lived about a mile distant, which brother sometimes traded with Lexington people, and during the past season had lost an animal of some disease. These were deemed suspicious facts, and the cow bought of the brother, though appearing to the inexperienced to be perfectly healthy, and the one by her side which was evidently diseased, were con- demned. The young cattle were taken from the pasture and kept in a stable for iwo weeks, that Dr. Thayer might have a good opportunity to examine them ; and that other herds might not be exposed previous to such an examination. On our visit- ing the place, two weeks afterward, one of the cows was dead. The young cattle were examined thoroughly, particularly the one bought of the brother, and also the remaining cow. The doctor thought she must have the disease in the chronic stage, being positive that she had a slight adhesion on one side, and there seemed to be no other way to trace the disease, as none of the young cattle had ever shown any symptoms of the disorder, and they had been kept all winter in the barn, with the one bought of the brother. The three cows, which Meade had owned for years, were dead. The lungs of one of them Dr. Thayer had examined, and there could be no mistake about its having had the contagious pleuro-pneumonia. The remaining cow must, as he thought, be the dragon that brought the trouble into the family ; and though she stood a perfect picture of inno- cence and health, was condemned. But alas for science ! her lungs proved to be as clean as her countenance, and we poor mortals were again afloat as to the evidence. To make the matter still worse, it was found on hearing all the testimony in regard to the brother's animal, that something else than pleuro- pneumonia must have been the trouble with it. To relieve us from the terrible dilemma, the veterinary surgeon of Boxborougli suggested that Mr. Meade lived on a road over which cattle were sometimes driven on their way to and from New Hampshire, and what more probable than that some of them might have had the disease, and stopped long enough at Meade's barnyard SECRETARY'S REPORT. 19 to have left it! The great mi/stery vi-Q.s solved, and we left! Let it be born in mind that there was no evidence that the disease called pleuro-pneumonia had ever existed in any other herd than Meade's, kept in the neighborhood of Boxborongh ; that Meade's cows, beyond a question, had the contagious form of the disease ; that he, or his neighbors, raised his whole herd, except the two animals before mentioned, and thei/ were free from the disease ; and it will be seen at once that it was neces- sary to adopt the theory of the old negro, the veterinary surgeon referred to, or some similar one, or the doctrine of the exclu- sive contagiousness of the disease must be abandoned. On the tenth of November, just as we were settling into the belief that we had effectually checked the spread of the disease, not hftvhig had a fresh case for three months. Dr. Thayer decided that the herd belonging to the city of Boston, kept on Deer Island, was seriously affected with pleuro-pneumonia. The Board was called to confer with the directors of the house of industry in relation to the matter. After a consultation in which it was suggested by some of the directors, and, as I thought, generally assented to by their board, that Deer Island was just the place to try experiments as to the disease, it was agreed on our part witli Mr. Payson, with whom the city author- ities had left the whole matter, so far as they were concerned, ■ that on the Tuesday following (this was on Saturday,) the Commissioners would go to Deer Island, have the herd appraised, Dr. Thayer would examine it carefully, and tlie State should take that part of it in which he should find any evidence of the disease existing, and the city should hold the remainder. Mr. Payson was to keep the whole stock without food from Monday night till we should arrive on Tuesday, that the doctor might have the better opportunity to detect any trace of disease. From some cause, never satisfactorily explained, I found on arriving on Deer Island on the day agreed upon, that the programme had been entirely changed, and the Com- missioners had agreed, without consulting me in relation to the matter, to take the whole herd, and have it slaughtered, unless Mr. Payson should see fit to select some of it to keep, it being understood that should such part of the stock as he might select thereafter have the pleuro-pneumonia, the State should pay the city the amount at which they were appraised. Against this 20 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. arrangement I felt it my duty to protest, because I deemed it a matter of great importance to the Commonwealth that the question should be fairly tested, whether cattle affected with this disease are worth keeping. We had been requested by the governor and council to test, as best we could, this and other points. Up to this time we had labored under difficulties which here would be entirely overcome ; — such as finding suitable per- sons to take care of, and places to keep such cattle in, without exposure to others. Here was a herd of valuable cattle, cows valued by Mr. Payson at from eighty to one hundred and fifty dollars. Certainly if any animals were worth keeping through a siege of the disease these were. Perhaps on no other farm in this State is there that precise care taken of stock, so as to be able to tell the profit or loss attending it ; no one coula here' complain of the danger of exposure to other herds, this being the only one on the island. In short, if there be a place in this Commonwealth where such an experiment can be carried on successfully, it would seem that Deer Island is that place ; or if there be any cattle worth thus experimenting with, such stock as they had there is that stock. It had been found that in many cases where cattle were killed the effects of the disease were so slight that no one would pronounce the beef unhealthy for food. Mr. Payson had killed an ox of this herd that Dr. Thayer, as a physician, had advised him to use. I proposed that if this herd must all be slaughtered, the stock appearing to be healthy be held by Mr. Payson, so that should there be any such cases as referred to, the State might not lose their whole appraisal ; the Commissioners having previously decided that the law did not allow them to dispose of the beef when the slightest trace of the disease was found. But this proposition was rejected. In a single day's slaughtering were found two oxen appraised at two hundred and forty-seven dollars and fifty cents, (1247.50,) and would have brought more than two hundred dollars in market ; which both my associates decided they should not hesitate to eat or give to their families, but whicli we could not sell. The herd was slaughtered, with the exception of four cows, two yearlings and a calf; and these were saved, not as the report of the Commissioners might lead one to conclude, for them to try an experiment with, but because Mr. Payson would rather run the risk of their having SECRETARY'S REPORT. 21 the disease than to suffer the loss he would, if he accepted the appraisal. Fourteen of the thirty-five slaughtered hy the Com- missioners were more or less diseased ; two of them would probably have died. Up to this time not the slightest evidence has been found that the disease had been brought to the island from other herds ; and yet several of the daily papers of Boston published articles calculated, if not intended, to lead the public to believe that the disease had been traced to a yoke of oxen bought of a man in New Hampshire, who, four years ago, sent the disease to Quincy. It is true that the lungs appearing to have been long- est affected were taken from a yoke of oxen Mr. Payson bought last May of a man bearing the same family name of him who it is said sold the cattle which caused the trouble at Quincy in 1861. But it is also true that the oxen bought by Mr. Payson had stood in the same stable, eaten at the same rack, drank at the same trough, worked in the same field, and been with through the entire summer, three or four other yoke of oxen, all of which were killed, and no trace of the disease found. It is also true that they had never been with any other cattle of the diseased herd ; were kept in a barn separated from them by a distance of several rods, and the only possible exposure there could have been from them was in that they all drank at the same trough, but never at the same time. It is also true that Mr. Payson had worked these oxen through the entire season without having had the least idea of their having been diseased. He says that some time during the summer one of the oxen did not thrive as well as he thought he ought to have done, and he ordered a little more grain put into his food. These facts are worth noticing, as tending to show the value of such cattle for work. Still, again, it is true that the butcher employed on this farm says that he killed an animal from this herd more than a year ago whose kings were affected in pre- cisely the same way that those were which the Commissioners decided had the pleuro-pneumonia. But his story was not believed. Ah no ! for it ran counter to the popular theory in regard to the disease. The tale of any old gossip, nay, even the " heard tell " which dame Rumor so generally employs, is suffi- cient to prove that the cattle at the Box Tavern were the means of giving the disease to Smith's herd. But here, a man who 22 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. says he examined the lungs carefully, and certainly had percep- tion enough, if ever he had seen one good case of pleuro- pneumonia, to know another case, is doubted. The old lady could not be made to believe her son's story of the wonders of the sea, though told with moderation ; but when he told her of the great gold chariot-wheel which they fished out of the Red Sea, stamped with Pharaoh's name, she could believe, because she had read in the Scripture about its being lost there. There is still another fact in relation to the Deer Island stock worthy of notice, viz. : seven of the ten cows killed by the Commis- sioners, and found diseased, had passed from the acute to the chronic stage of the disease without Mr. Payson's notice, either by the falling off in their milk, or in any other way ; a fact which carries additional weight when we remember that Mr. Payson is not one of those " guess so " farmers, but one who takes just pride in pointing out each cow in his herd, and refer- ring to his memoranda, states the exact amount of milk she gave in any given month, and the butter made therefrom. One may well ask how can it be that cows affected with pleuro- pneumonia are worthless for milk, when such a man had it in his herd for months, and never dreamed but that he had a healthy herd ? My associates, in their Report, mention the fact that an experi- ment is in progress to test certain points in reference to the effect of pleuro-pneumonia in cows, and without giving any particulars in relation to the progress of the experiment, inti- mated that at some future day all the facts shall be made known. It seems to me proper that the facts thus far developed should be reported, and I shall therefore venture to give such as have come to my knowledge. About tlie first of July two cows were brought from Smith's herd, in Ashby, to Newtonville, and placed in a barn which had been previously selected as a suitable place to try the experi- ment. To all appearance this barn is in a healthy locality, and unless tlie confinement to which the cows were subjected be objected to, I cannot see why it was not a good place for the trial. On the eighth of the same month four cows were brought from Maine, and immediately after their arrival, while in that state of exhaustion which the journey would produce, one of them was tied in a stall between the two sick cows, for SECRETARY'S REPORT. 23 twenty-four hours. Each of the Maine cows were similarly exposed. The two cows brought from Ashby were then killed, and found to have been diseased with contagious pleuro- pneumonia. The lungs of one were but sliglitly affected, but the other had a large portion of one lung diseased. No other animal of Smith's herd, except one cow, was as badly affected, the lung on one side weighing twelve pounds, on the other a little over two pounds. In about forty days Dr. Thayer decided that one of the exposed cows had the disease, and expressed an opinion that two others would have it. Two other veterinary surgeons were quite confident that three of the four cows had an adhesion, but Dr. Thayer has never given it as his opinion that more than one has had pleuro-pneumonia. Owing partly to an indisposition on the part of a majority of the Commissioners, and partly to a difficulty to find a suitable place, no more cows were exposed till the fourteenth, after the cow at Newtonville was taken sick, when she was carried to Weston and exposed for several 'days to two cows brought from Upton, and after the exposure taken back to Newtonville. Neither of the Upton cows had shown any symptoms of the malady up to the time the disease was discovered on Deer Island, (nearly three months,) and it was thought best to expose them to an animal from that herd. Accordingly, Dr. Thayer selected an animal which he pro- nounced perfect for the purpose, had it carried to Newton and exposed the cows there to his satisfaction, when the animal was killed and found to have had the disease in its worst form. It is supposed that there has not been sufficient time since the last exposure to indicate the effect.* To sum up the result, we have exposed in the manner I have stated six cows ; one only has had the disease ; three of tliem have had the double exposure of having two cows affected with the disease tied on either side of them for twenty-four hours, in such a manner as to make it certain that they should inhale the breath of the sick ones, eat * Since writing the foregoing, I learn from Dr. Thayer that the " Uptftn cows" were exposed to the animal from Deer Island for two weeks, it having been tied between them during the whole of that time. Sixty days have passed since, and neither of the cows has shown any evidence of having had the disease, unless a slight cough in one of them may be considered such. Forty-five days is the extent of time fixed upon as the time of incubation. 24 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. the food that the sick one had breathed upon ; and also of being kept in the stable with one diseased cow through the whole course of her sickness, with the exception of two or three days. In about twenty days from the time the cow brought from Maine was taken sick, Dr. Thayer told me she gave about the same quantity of milk that she did before her sickness, which certainly was a little singular, as every farmer knows that if, from any cause, a cow falls off in her milk for any considerable number of days it is not often she comes up to the same mark without a change in the feed, and there was no change in this case. Such are all the facts bearing upon the points named in the first part of this Report which I have been able to gather. Meagre, I know them to be ; so meagre that he must be a rash man who would attempt to build any theory thereon. It would seem to me that they rather tend to a disbelief in the present popular theory in regard to the disease than to furnish the mate- rial to build a new one. But I do not feel that I am wholly at fault that they are so comparatively unimportant ; more than once have I proposed that we call to our aid some man of acknowledged medical skill and scientific ability. But all such propositions have ever met with disapproval. It certainly is consistent in him who has no faith in medicine to refuse to call a physician, and equally so in him who believes he knows as much as any one, to ask advice of others. • I do not hesitate to say then that the experiment at Newtonville has proved of but comparatively little value. My associates have no faith in the use of medicine for the disease, and still more, they think that he who is not already satisfied that the only proper treat- ment of a herd effected, is to have it immediately slaughtered, is not worthy of the pains it would require to convince him. Men having such views cannot be expected to carry on an experiment with that interest necessary to elicit the truth ; nor can it be expected that farmers who have their herds appraised at what three disinterested men swear is a fair market value will make much effort to prove they are worth keeping, when they know that a majority of those who are to judge between them and the State consider it worse than useless. It is asserted, and I suppose generally believed, that the disease has no parallel in the human or brute creation. I SECRETARY'S REPORT. 25 have said that the proposition to take counsel of experi- enced medical men had met with no favor with the Board. The only testimony I have therefore on this point is the opinion of one who has had no little experience, and in whose judgment I have that confidence which leads me to trust my own and the life of my family to his skill, who gave it as his opinion on an examination of one of the more thorouglily diseased lungs we have taken from any animal, that there was nothing about it that he should not expect to find in an acute case of the lung fever. Let no one suppose that I offer this opinion thinking it of much value ; for I do not even consider, what is so often and triumphantly referred to, the opinions of Tom, Dick, and Harry across the water, worth considering for one moment, when we can for a tithe of the money which has been expended by the Commissioners in a single year, by properly conducted experiments place all the questions of interest in relation to this disease, and its effects forever beyond the need of an opinion. It is not many years since the whole medical faculty of the old world stood aghast at the virulence of a disease which to-day is but little feared by skilful medical men, either there or here. Nor is it long since he would have been set down as a simpleton who ventured the opinion that any one of many of the diseases not now classed among contagious disorders, was other than purely so. If it be proved that pleuro-pneumonia never appeared in this country until Chenery brought it from abroad, it does not follow that it is not now an epidemic. Nor does it follow, by any means, that because the veterinary surgeons of this country have found no remedy for the disease, therefore it cannot be cured, and, that too, so readily as to make it the part of folly to slaughter every herd in which it appears. Certain it is to my mind that not twenty, nay, nor even a hundred thousand dollars will drive tlie disease from this State if expended in the manner it has heretofore been. Many times have I been warned against doing anything which miglit jeopardize the farming interest of this State, or the health of the people. I am a farmer, and what is more, one who believes that whatever effects their welfare is of vital importance to the Commonwealth, nor would I say one word which I believe could possibly endanger the health of one of the humblest of our citizens. But I can but think it necessary, that the whole truth 4* 26 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. in regard to this disease be brought to light. I do not deem it proper to enter into an argument as to the best course to be followed in relation to the disorder, but simply to give you the facts as they have come before me, trusting that the legislature would search out any defects that may exist in the present statutes bearing upon this case, and apply the remedy. Let me suggest that if the present system of slaughter is to be continued, that the law be so amended as to enable the Commissioners to sell for meat such beef as they may deem perfectly healthy for food. I annex hereunto a copy of each of the Orders * passed by the governor's council, intended as it would seem to be a guide in some degree for our action. There can be no possible doubt but that the course therein indicated could be carried out with perfect safety to the community. Nor can I for a moment question whether a series of experiments, if made by men compe- tent to make the same, would ultimately be the means of saving a vast amount of property to the Commonwealth. Certain is it that the public would then have the satisfaction of knoiving- what had better be done instead of groping where, at best, all is mere conjecture. . F. D. Lincoln. Brimfield, January 7, 1865. I have been desirous from the first to embody in my Reports a full history of the proceedings on the part of the Common- wealth and individuals acting in any official capacity, in regard to this disease. It is for that reason that I have delayed the printing some days to give place to the above report of the minority. I will not allude to its general tone of gross injustice .to Dr. Thayer, whose long experience and observation of this malady would seem to entitle him to be treated with respect, at least, by a colleague just appointed upon the commission, with no previous observation of the disease. Every one who knows the competency of Dr. Thayer and his eminent fitness for the position he holds upon the commission, will entertain the fullest confidence in his skill and judgment, in the perform- ance of his duties. He is well known to be better informed in regard to the disease and the facts of its more recent history than any other man in the Commonwealth. It is but fair that *The substance of these Orders is given on page 12, in the report of the majority. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 27 he should liave an opportunity to correct many of the state- ments so well calculated to mislead, and I therefore give place to the following communication : Dear Sir, — I wish to review, in as brief a manner as possible, the minority report of F. D. Lincoln,. Commissioner on Conta- gious Diseases of Cattle. Passing over the few first pages, in the 14th, he says, " There had been kept a pair of oxen belonging to one Willard, of Ashby, which were supposed to have pleuro- pneumonia. I say supposed, ecomes so much a matter of renewed interest. And when we find included in one grand whole, the best selection «nd manage- ment of lands, the best mode of stocking, the best construction of buildings, the best use of manures, the best collection of machinery, the best methods of tillage, the most careful and successful application of the most approved forces to the work of a farm, the best exercise of modern intelligence and culture in this work, we have before us an example worthyof imita- tion, and a chapter on farming which we cannot study with too much care. It is especially important that the agricultural societies should use every exertion to collect and diffuse this information. Premiums on farms, premiums on the best man- aged manure heap, the economy of its construction, and the greatest amount made with a given number of animals ; pre- miums on the best collection of agricultural implements actually used one season on a farm; premiums on the most systematic, intelligible and accurate statement of the business of a farm, should be offered, and farmers should be encouraged to compete for them. I am aware that some of the information gained in this way may be somewhat crude and inaccurate. But the true value of such information cannot long remain concealed, and it serves as a proof by contrast, much more often than as a means of SECRETARY'S REPORT. 43 misleading those who are in search of true knowledge. Neither has it that insidious danger, which attends a false theory pre- sented with all the tempting and hewildering influence of what is called scientific authority. In discussing the question, how to manage a farm, I have been led on to consider the duties of farmers toward agricul- tural societies, and the reciprocal obligations of the latter, because, I have always found that associations of this sort have always exerted a good influence on the agriculture of the region in which they are located. There is nothing so contagious as good farming — unless it be bad. The example set by an indus- trious and skillful farmer is never lost on the community in which he lives. As his own labor radiates from his homestead out over his surroiinding acres, so does his example and influ- ence spread over the farms about him. And societies composed of such men, have a wider influence still. They bring together the thoughts and deeds of a larger section. And when we remember how isolated a farmer may be, and often is, how under the confinement of his own business he sees but little of what is going on about him, it will be easy to appreciate the value of any association which will enlarge his sphere of obser- vation, and bring him into closer relations with his neighbors, whether near or remote. And in the desultory remarks which I have made upon farm management, I have endeavored to draw our own attention to th3 diversity of interests, and the variety of questions which come before us as a Board of Agri- culture. We have our part to perform in the work of agricul- tural education now going on. And we shall only perform that part well, when by diligent collection of facts, and proper arrangement of them, by the encouragement of practical indus- try, by the diffusion of practical knowledge, we furnish the foundation of good farming to every one who will read, and point to those examples of good husbandry, the following of which will enable every sagacious and diligent land-owner to convert his acres into a well-managed farm. At the conclusion of the address. His Excellency proposed a vote of thanks to the speaker for his very able and interesting address, which passed unanimously. 44 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. The first question for discussion was then announced as "Agricultural Education," and on motion of Dr. Loring, Gov- ernor Andrew was invited to give the Board his views on the establishment of an agricultural college, and the course of study to be pursued. Gov. Andrew. — I do not think I have any views to give upon the subject of an agricultural college, which would be quite appropriate at this moment. Those which I most sincerely entertain have been given officially, heretofore, and have been pretty well understood by the people of the Commonwealth who take an interest in the subject, and who care to know what they are. I do not think that the views which I entertain upon the subject of an agricultural college are those which, at this moment, are quite popular in the Commonwealth among the farmers. My own views, I think, were substantially overruled by the action of the legislature, and I do not care to say any- thing with a view to interfere with, or to question, or to criticise — not even to criticise in a friendly spirit — the tendency which the management of the subject takes, under the^direction which has been given to it by the legislation of the Commonwealth. I think it better that those things which are undertaken, and which are settled, should have an opportunity to be fairly tried. I believe in the fair trial of any experiment which it has been once agreed shall be attempted ; and I think it is well to have every question closed, at any rate, for the purpose of experi- ment, at some time ; and, therefore I do not believe that any views peculiar to myself would be advantageous to be presented at this moment. I certainly, on this and all other occasions, feel entire freedom to express a sincere and very earnest interest in the subject itself, regarded in any of its relations. ' The suliject of agricultural education, — by which I mean, when I speak of it in connection with a college, not merely instruction in farming, regarded as a trade, — not merely what I may call the technical instruction of the practical farmer, but something a great deal more than that ; because instruction in the technicalities of farming, regarded as a trade, may be obtained in every town in the Commonwealth, on the good farms and from the good farmers. But I believe that all farming will depreciate and run to seed, just exactly as ] believe that mechanics and manufactures, and all those pursuits which are SECRETARY'S REPORT. 45 more commonly regarded as the learned pursuits and profes- sions would run down and utterly depreciate unless there was a standard higher than that which is observed and cultivated by those who, for convenience' sake, we will call the practical men ; and all practical men, so called, are in danger of committing this error, of regarding the standard of the practical man as the standard of ideal excellence. My notion is, that an institution, grand and generous, intended to be lasting, both in its own history and in its bearings and ultimate effect, should have in itself the capacity of presenting an ideal standard, not merely a practical one. If it does not present something a great deal better and higher than the best farmer in Massachusetts can realize and actualize in his annual experimentation on his own farm, it then falls far below its own proper standard. Now, the university or college where young men arc taught in those studies which are preliminary to those in whicli they engage with a view to the procurement of a particular profes- sion, must have a staff of professors, it must have a laboratory, it must have a library, it must have those means and appliances of teaching and culture which are very far beyond those pos- sessed by any one of the individual gentlemen who are its patrons and supporters, and very far beyond those wliich will be the private possession of any of its best pupils afterwards, or else it will fall very far below the proper standard of such an institution. Unless a theological school possess a library more extended, more various, more rich and fertile than the private library of the country clergyman, or of the most favored and wealtliy clergyman of the community, it Avill turn out very poorly instructed men in the domain of theological science and learning. Unless the law school possesses much more ample resources in respect of the particular branches of study which it is necessary a young man should be taught, than are pos- sessed by the mass, or even by the most favored individuals of the profession in Massachusetts, you will have but a very inade- quate representative of what the poorest and humblest lawyer would regard as an adequate and appropriate law school of Massachusetts. So, too, if you please, take the apothecary, or the most learned, skilful, studious, and scientific physician, engineer, mechanician, or cultivator of any of the specific branches of applied science in the community, — any such person, 46 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. having any proper sense of the dignity of his own calling, feels the necessity for the existence, somewhere, of a fountain to which he may resort, and to which his children may be sent, for instruction, for books, for machinery, for all the appliances and means of the laboratory ; and unless some such thing exist, somewhere in the community, he knows that his own art, his own science, even in its application to the practical affairs of life, must run down. Now, it seems to me, that the time has come when the agri- culturists of a State as full of all the resources of learning as Massachusetts is, as full of wealth, as full of intelligent, scientific, and practical farmers as Massachusetts is, with so high an ideal standard as the people of Massachusetts possess of all sorts of excellence in theoretical and practical affairs both, — I think the time has come when the agriculturists of Massachusetts have a right themselves to be represented, and their posterity hereafter to be benefited, by an institution which shall be to agriculture, regarded as an applied science, or as one of the means of the application of science (for that would be truer,) what the higher institutions of science and learning are to the learned profes- sions, more specifically so called. Everybody knows, who has observed the matter at all, how far farming, even in the best communities, lags behind almost all the other arts and profes- sions of our refined civilization. Farmers themselves have a great tendency to regard their calling not in any sense as a profession, but only as a trade, and to regard it as one to be learned, not scientifically, but empirically. Now, that is the greatest and most utter nonsense in the world ; for the wealth, comfort, refinement, and civilization which mankind enjoys rest at last iipon that solid basis of the land ; and they are all sup- ported and nurtured (not merely human life, but all its arts and all its refinements,) at the last, from the cultivated soil ; and just in proportion as you can elevate agriculture itself, will you finally elevate, I think, the people of any country. But agri- culture is not to be elevated in the way you lift a rock, by prying it mechanically ; it must be elevated just as the human soul itself aspires and soars towards heaven — by the inspiration of light and immortal truth ; by the inspiration of that truth which enlightens and lifts up the individual mind and soul and permeates and so lifts up the whole community. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 47 I feel the utmost diffidence in attempting to speak at all upon a subject of which I am conscious I have only the slightest pos- sible glimpse. I am no farmer ; I have not the means to be a farmer ; I have not the time to be one ; I have none of the opportunities for that sort of enjoyment or culture which are given to many of the gentlemen who are here before me ; and therefore I can only lisp what I may call the struggling aspira- tions of a soul which feels a certain sympathy with a great object, a grand purpose ; which is grand when considered in connection with our patriotic as well as our economical duties and interests as citizens and as men ; and I feel that in so doing, I only com- mend to other men a line of thought which they can pursue with a degree of profit and instruction to which I can hope in no measure to aspire. And if by these few remarks thus unex- pectedly made, I shall have opened the way to a discussion, I shall be more than thankful for having had the opportunity to make them. C. L. Flint. — It so happens that I have given my views on this subject at very considerable length in the last Annual Report, which has been placed, probably, in the liands of almost every person present ; so that my general views in regard to the subject of agricultural education in Massachusetts are pretty well known. But perhaps it may be well to state, very briefly, what has already been done by the trustees of the Agricultural College, — for that is a subject which I suppose this question was intended to embrace. It is well known, probably, to most persons here present, that the national government made a grant, two years ago, of public land scrip to each of the loyal States, in the proportion of 30,000 acres for each representative and senator in Congress, for the purpose of establishing agricultural colleges in the several States. That gave Massachusetts 3(30,000 acres of the public land. By the terms of the Act, one-tenth only of that grant could be used for the purchase of land for an agricultural col- lege in each State. That took out 36,000 acres of the scrip. The legislature .in its wisdom saw fit to grant three-tenths of the remainder to be spent under the direction of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. That is an institute which has been incorporated in Boston, and which is starting forth under very favorable circumstances, designed to teach the application of 48 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. science to all the mechanical arts ; and it will teach this in the most thorough and efficient manner, with large means, ample resources, and the highest scientific talent in the country. The legislature took the view, that as instruction in the mechanic arts was the special province of the institute, that part of the Act which contemplated instruction in the mechanic arts, (for that was contemplated as well as agriculture,) could be better carried out by that institute than by an agricultural college, and therefore provided that three-tenths of the land scrip should be applied under the direction and supervision of that institute. That left 216,000 acres to be sold, and the proceeds invested as a permanent fund, the income alone of which is to be iised for the support of an agricultural college. The legislature at the same time appointed a board of trustees for this Agricultural College, merely as agents to carry out the general policy which had been adopted by the Commonwealth. Another condition was, that in the selection of a site for this Agricultural College, the trustees should either raise them- selves the sum of $75,000, or the town where the location should be fixed should raise that amount,*to be applied to the erection of suitable buildings ; so that, in the selection of a location, the trustees were limited to those towns which complied with this condition, otherwise, they would have had to go forward and raise the $75,000 themselves. It will be seen, therefore, that the trustees were not at liberty to go into any part of the Com- monwealth and locate this institution where in their best judg- ment it would seem to be for the best interests of the institution and of the Commonwealth that it should be located, but they were practically limited to those locations which should offer to raise $75,000 — a sum not easy to be raised in many sections of the State. One individual in the town of Lexington offered, with great liberality, $50,000, in cash, on condition that the town should raise the other $25,000, and the trustees were assured that that amount would be raised. Then the town of Spring- field assured the trustees, by their representatives, that if they saw fit to locate tlie College there, tlie money would be raised ; and the same pledge was made for Northampton and Amherst. There were, then, four competitors for that location. The trus- tees had fixed in their minds, in the main, what they desired in connection with the location of the College. They found, on SECRETARY'S REPORT. 49 examination, that the land which was offered to them in Lexing- ton was mainly adapted to a grass farm, the gentleman owning it having spent more than a thousand dollars an acre on much of the land in clearing it of rocks, and in otlier general improve- ments. , It was not, therefore, so well adapted to the general purposes of experiment and cultivation as the trustees thought the farm connected with an agricultural college ought to be. The places offered them in Springfield were not what the trus- tees thought desirable ; the farms offered in Northampton were not fully satisfactory ; and they came to the conclusion, after considerable examination and deliberation, that so far as the farm was concerned, that in Amherst was on the whole better adapted for the purposes of such an institution than the farms offered in either of the other towns, so that they felt bound, on the whole, to locate the institution, so far as their power and choice should go, in the town of Amherst. The town of Amherst assured the trustees that the $75,000 would be raised, and it has been raised. I make this general statement in regard to the subject in order that those present who may not be familiar with the course which the matter has taken may understand the pi)sition in which the trustees of the Agricultural CjoUege were placed. They were actually limited to these four locations, and they were obliged to select the one which, in their judgment, appeared to be the best of the four. It is not necessary to say, that if there had been a wider range of choice, the result might have been very different. I will state in addition, — although I suppose the matter to be now so far closed that it cannot lead to any practical result — the plan which it was thought by some would, on the whole, be for the best interests of the State. It is well known to those present that there was a large farm, known as the Bussey estate, in West Roxbury, left to Harvard College, half of the fund left with it tt) be devoted to the establishment of an agricultural college on the farm, one quarter to the Law School, and the remaining quarter to the Divinity School. This farm comprises 300 acres, is beautifully situated, well walled, and furnished with all the desirable improvements for a large and elegant farm. The income from that fund, at the present moment, is from twelve to fifteen thousand dollars a year. The estate is subject only to a 7* 50 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. single life interest, which could, no doubt, be easily purchased. Now, it was supposed that arrangements could be made with the corporation of Harvard College, by which tliat farm could be placed under the control of the present board of trustees of the Agricultural College, Harvard College reserving to itself only so much control, by the way of visitation and the appointment of trustees as to comply with the terms of the will. Now, it will be seen that in case the agricultural population of the Common- wealth had the right eventually to decide this question, and if they could see it for their interest to unite the national fund with the fund left by Mr. Bussey, there would be an income of twenty-five or thirty thousand dollars, which might be applied to the support of this agricultural institution almost immediately. I think that nobody will say that an annual fund of twenty- five or thirty thousand dollars would not have made such an institution a success, because that would have secured the liighest scientific talent in the world. But the popular sentiment seemed to be, that the farmer should have an institution by himself; that there should be an Agricultural College established for the express purpose of edu- cating farmers' sons alone ; and the general opinion seemed to be tliat that institution sliould be isolated, should be devoted, to a large extent, to practical agriculture, and if practical agri- culture were to form a large element in it, it would be desirable that it should be located further inland. There are evidently two sides to the question. There are some objections, perhaps, to a location in the immediate neighborhood of a large city, or another collegiate institution. The question before tlie people was, really, whether the advantages of that large fund, with the farm connected with it, and the incidental advantages of the Institute of Technology and of the institutions in that immediate neighborhood, were not so great as to make it very important that the location should be fixed there. I will not attempt to enter at any length into the discussion of that point, because 1 suppose the question is now fixed beyond any change, whatever may be the opinion of any one individual in regard to it. The discussion was continued by E. W. Stebbins, of Deer- field, Levi Stockbridge, of North Hadley, Alured Homer, of Brimfield, Velorous Taft, of Upton, C. 0. Perkins, of Becket, and Dr. Geo. B. Loring, of Salem. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 51 Gov. Andrew. — Perhaps I may be permitted to recall to the memory of gentlemen, one important consideration, which -lies at the bottom of everything which has been said about the establishment of an Agricultural College, and that is, that no fund whatever has been provided by the legislature of Massa- chusetts, nor by any of the people, in addition to the 300,000 acres of land scrip, with the exception of the $75,000 which it was provided by the Act of the legislature, incorporating the Agricultural College should be raised by subscription, for the purpose of erecting the buildings. The Act of Congress donat- ing the public lands, in the proportion of 30,000 acres to each member of Congress, senator and representative, for this pur- pose, provided that no part of the proceeds of the sale thereof, should be used for the purpose of erecting buildings, but one- tenth part of the amount donated to each State might be used for the purchase of land. Before anything could be done, therefore, some provision had to be made for the procurement of buildings. The only provision made by the legislature for this purpose was the one requiring that the sum of $75,000 should be raised by subscription or private donations. That $75,000 could be procured only by making it for the interest of the people of a given town or neighborhood to subscribe towards the establisliment of the institution in their own vicinity, it being supposed to be advantageous to have it in the neighbor- hood of any given people who should subscribe the money necessary for the buildings. There were three or four neigh- borhoods, therefore, as Mr. Flint has already remarked, who proffered the requisite sum of $75,000. Now, after the pro- curement of the land, and the erection of the buildings — so far as $75,000 will go towards their erection — there is no fund save the land scrip, three-tenths of which" have been given to the Institute of Technology, as the proper proportion belonging to the mechanics and manufacturers, who have an interest in the fund. After taking out, therefore, the one-tenth for the procurement of land, and giving three-tenths to the Institute of Technology, in aid of the cultivation of the sciences and arts in connection with the study of mechanics and practical manu- facture, there remains six-tenths of the 360,000 acres as the only fund of the Agricultural College. 52 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. Now, I tried, very early, by correspondence with the governors of the other States, to effect an arrangement with all the States by which this land scrip should be reserved, and not thrown upon the market at a less price than a dollar an acre, believing that all the public lands available were worth, and would turn out to be worth, a dollar an acre. You know that $1.25 an acre is the price at which lands that have been surveyed can be acquired ; and land warrants representing land which had not been surveyed could be bought, at tliat time, for about a dollar an acre. I thought that the people of the States, being inter- ested in keeping up the price of the lands to a fair minimum, ought to be willing, at home, in their own States, to purchase the land scrip, giving their State governments, which were made, by Act of Congress, the trustees of this school fund, a fair price like that ; then, after individuals or companies had purchased the land scrip they would be free to enter it upon any surveyed lands which were open for entry. The State could not enter ; she could only sell the scrip. No State, under the Act of Congress, can be the holder of any land lying outside of its own borders, and as we have no public land within our borders, we could enter none. The State of Massachusetts could sell its land scrip, and the persons who bought could then enter and occupy the land. I found, however, very little response from the other States, and within a very short time after, the State of New York actually put their land scrip upon the market, and brolvC down the price at once to eighty cents, and other States began to follow on. Last winter, I talked with various gentlemen whom I knew, — public- spirited men, men of means more or less ample, — and various gentlemen interested in agriculture as practical farmers or otherwise, who I knew possessed more or less available means, urging upon them the importance of creating a working fund for the Agricultural College, and endeavoring to show to them that it would not involve much outlay of money, considering the large number of people and the large amount of means which they controlled who were interested in the subject, if they would take all our scrip at a reasonable price, or at a price a little liberal, and take the chance, if necessary, of a small margin of loss. But there did not appear to be any interest in tliat particular view of the subject which was intense enougli to SECRETARY'S REPORT. 53 secure tlie disposition of the scrip in that way. The governor and council, in pursuance of the authority and duty imposed upon them by the Act of the legislature, fixed upon eighty cents an acre a^ the minimum price at which this land scrip might be sold, and Judge French was appointed a commissioner, under the Act, and authorized to sell the scrip, subject to the minimum price of eighty cents an acre, under the general supervision of a committee of two members of the council, if I remember right, so that the details of the operation should be always overlooked by some persons connected with the executive government of the Commonwealth. Precisely how much has been sold, I do not recollect ; but I think about 80,000 acres, at a price of eighty cents an acre, or perhaps a trifle above. So, gentlemen, you see that when we are discussing this sub- ject in view of what we would like to have, what we would prefer, what we would advise, we are, perhaps, necessarily, a renaote distance ofif from any substantially practical view which it is possible for the trustees of the Agricultural College to take, in administering the fund of the institution, under the Act of the legislature. It has been the object, I believe, of the trustees, to set the institution in motion as early as they conveniently could do it ; still, it can never come to anything at all until the whole or nearly all the land scrip shall have been disposed of ; and at the present price of eighty cents an acre, it will only afford a very meagre and beggarly fund from the income of which to maintain an institution which shall be of any sort of credit or usefulness to the Commonwealth ; and if any of the trustees were influenced to vote in favor of establishing it in the neighborhood of any other institution of learning, from which they might hope to derive assistance, either by the aid of its library, its laboratory, or the convenient contiguity of its scientific professors, whom they might also employ to lecture, it was probably owing to what they felt to be the exigent necessity of the case, which admitted no alternative. If the people of the Commonwealth who have a living interest, a personal interest, they and their posterity, in such an institution, had undertaken fo be liberal in a pecuniary way, as well as liberal in their views concerning the organization and purposes of such an institution, it might then have been put upon a basis entirely independent of any suspicion, even, of a connection with any 54 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. other institution. But I think that a fund very much larger than is ordinarily supposed to be necessary would be found requisite in order to establish an institution which should be of any great advantage or any credit to the Commen wealth. Had it been thought proper to have taken measures to put the Bussey Institute into operation, and to make that fund available immediately, then the scrip which was given by the United States to the Commonwealth, might have been easily enough withheld from the market until it could bring a price propor- tionate to its real value ; and in the meantime, the institution might have been set into operation immediately and its fund enlarged by the aggregations from time to time derivable from the proceeds of the sales of the land scrip. That, however, was not the view which met the approbation of the legislature, and, perhaps, not of the people of the Commonwealth, and it has not been undertaken. The Bussey Institute, however, will some- time or other, of necessity, become a living and active institution. As soon as the life shall terminate of the person who holds the life estate in the Bussey family, it will then become the duty of the corporation of Harvard College, either directly, or indirectly through other persons or societies, to incorporate that institu- tion. There will be a farm of some three hundred acres, as Mr. Flint has mentioned, in a very high state of cultivation, with a great many of tlie means and appliances of elegant as well as useful, valuable and productive farming, the proceeds of which will form a fund out of which the lecturers, professors, and other expenses of an institution of learning can be main- tained. In the meantime, nothing having been done by that institution, there is at present no practical work of that sort open to the farmers of the Commonwealth, as far as I know, except to do their best to render efficient the institution which is no'w called the Agricultural College of Massachusetts. Evening Session. — The Board met according to adjournment, and Leander Wetherell, Esq., of Boston, delivered a valuable lecture on Agricultural Botany, which was listened to with great attention by a large and intelligent audience. On motion of I)r. Loring, the thanks of the Board were presented to Mr. Wetherell for his interesting lecture, and the meeting adjourned to Wednesday morning, at 10 o'clock. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 55 SECOND DAY. Wednesday, Dec. 14. Morning Session. — The Board met at ten o'clock. In the absence of the president, Dr. Loring was appointed chairman. On motion of Mr. Perkins, a committee of three was appointed to consider the subject of the Agricultural College, and report to-morrow morning, at ten o'clock. The chair announced as that committee, Messrs. Perkins, Huntington, and Grout. THE CORN CROP. The first subject announced for discussion was the corn crop, and Dr. Hartwell, of Southbridge, was called upon to open the discussion. Dr. Hartwell. — I am entirely unprepared to make a speech upon the subject, but I have some facts in relation to the man- ner of planting corn, the preparation of the soil, and taking care of the crop. No man can obtain a profitable crop of corn unless his soil is well enriched. It is in vain to plant corn upon poor soil. The ^old method of planting corn was to spread the manure, perhaps to the extent of twenty cartloads to the acre, over a large sur- face, and the farmer would usually obtain from twenty-five to thirty bushels to the acre. The expense of ploughing and cultivating an acre of corn, aside from putting on the manure, with the price of labor at a dollar a day, would be $15. The twenty loads of manure were worth to the farmer about $20. There was an outlay of $35 ; so that the decision of the farmer was, that there was no profit in raising corn. But if you will put on forty loads to the acre, and take good care of the corn, you may produce from sixty to seventy-five bushels an aci'e. The cost of plougliing and cultivating will then be $15 an acre ; for it is no more work to cultivate an acre for seventy-five bushels, than it is for twenty-five, and the cost of your manure $40. I should charge one-half the manure to the corn, and the other half to the succeeding crop, making tlie cost of your crop, $35 ; and if you have a crop of seventy bushels, at $1 a bushel, you have then a profit of $35 on that acre. The fodder will pay, as a general thing, the expense of taking care of the crop, after the last hoeing. The high-farming system there shows a profit, and it is the only system which will pay with the 56 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. corn crop. If you cannot go into the high-farming system, you had better abandon tlie crop. I have said that there should be forty loads of manure to the acre. .If you have 'but forty loads, put it all on one acre, not on two ; because the crop will not be much less at any rate, from one acre than from two, and you add $15 to the expense of raising it, if you cultivate two acres instead of one. In regard to the manner of planting, I will say that the dis- tance I have settled upon is three and a half feet each way. I think there should be, for every stalk of corn, at least three square feet. The poorest crop of corn I ever raised was planted with the hills less than three feet apart. It was well manured. It was the best-looking corn that I ever saw in the month of June, but it was so near together that it shaded the ground. The stalks were very thick, but the ears were very short. I have been told that in Virginia they only put one kernel into a "hill, and make the hills six or eight feet apart, and that a larger crop is secured with only a single kernel in a hill than with more. I usually put five kernels in a hill, as some of the seed will not germinate, and the worms will destroy some. At; the distance of three and one-half feet, if three stalks are left, it is sufficient. I can then cultivate my corn with the cultivator, and do it with animal power, which is always cheaper than hand labor. The cultivator can be run within six inches of the hill, each way, and then there will be one foot to each hill for hand hoeing. In putting the kernels into the hill it has been my practice to put them as near together as possible. Farmers were formerly in the habit of taking pains to spread the kernels as much as possible in the hill ; I find they grow better by being combined. There are several advantages in that combination. One is, it is much easier to cultivate the ground. The weeds do not come up among the corn, and you are not obliged to use your fingers in eradicating them. Another advantage is, that in hoeing, you can bring the earth up around all the stalks, without any trouble at all. Then they endure.the winds much better ; they will stand stronger against the blast than if they stood at a distance from each other. I never have observed a stray stalk of corn in a field that pro- duced a good ear. I consider that corn is a family plant, and that it will grow better in hills than in drills. Then again, in SECRETARY'S REPORT. 57 harvesting, the stalks come more directly within reach of the hand when growing compactly than when scattered over the hill. The cheapest way of harvesting is to cut up the corn and stack it whenever it is sufficiently ripe to avoid the danger of heating in the stack. Another advantage in cutting it up is to save it from the early frosts. If you have a frost by the 20th of September, if your corn is not pretty well ripened, it will be injured ; if it is in stacks, you are very sure to save your crop. The only objection to that way of harvesthig is the extra labor of husking, but that is very little. Your corn is then put up in bundles, and is ready for the pitchfork, and to be packed away in any part of your barn. As to the value of corn fodder, I am not very sure about it. I think, as a general thing, it has been overrated ; but I believe the fodder from an acre of corn that will produce fifty bushels is worth quite as much as a ton of English hay, and that will pay the expense of cutting, carrying to the barn, and packing away. With regard to the value of the corn crop, compared with other products of the farm for feeding, it has been usually estimated that fifty pounds of corn are worth one hundred pounds of the best English hay ; but some farmers I have known have had a disposition to abandon corn and go into barley, thinking that they would save labor and get about as much profit as they could from corn. I think they will abandon that idea. I think the corn crop one of the best crops in New England ; we know it is the great crop of the nation, and I think that any New England farmer who abandons that crop will be in a situation to impoverish his land. Rev. Mr. Dean. — Do you use phosphate, ashes, or plaster ? Dr. Hartwell. — No, sir, I have only used stable manure, and that upon the surface, for the reason that I have had plenty of manure for my land, and have not, therefore, used any of the stimulating manures. For a great many years I have put no manure in the hills. If the land is warm and well manured at the rate of forty loads to the acre, it will need noner The reason I have not put any manure in the hills is on account of the expense and labor of doing it. It would be no injury to the crop, and it might forward it in the month of June. But if 58 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. your land is warm there is no danger that the crop will not come forward in season. Rev. Mr. Dean. — Do you raise pumpkins or flat English turnips with your corn ? Dr. Hartwell. — No, sir, I have planted pumpkins, but I would as lief have weeds. I don't believe in putting any other crop with the corn. I plough my land in the fall, smooth over the surface, and then apply my manure ; and I usually work it in deep with a horse-plough. I spread the manure from the cart, and do not tip it up in heaps, because it is impossible to spread it evenly in that way. A load of manure is sufficient to spread over four square yards. Measure off that distance, set down stakes, and let your man spread his load over that space, and you will hit it. I have tried spreading the inanure on the ground in the fall and leaving it until spring, but I would not, as a general thing, advise it. If you put it on a westerly declivity it will blow away ; but if you have a piece of land that is protected by woods or that has an eastern or south- eastern declivity, there is no harm in putting on your manure in the fall. There was a premium offered by our society for the best acre of corn. I measured off one acre and weighed the crop after it was husked, and it averaged eighty pounds to the bushel in the cob, and the acre produced a fraction over one hundred bushels, for which they gave me the premium, $18. HoLLis TiDD, of New Braintree. — Was your land green-sward or old soil ? Dr. Hartwell. — This last year it was green-sward that had been mowed for some four years. It was turned over, thoroughly smoothed down, and the manure spread over it. To do this it is necessary to keep a stock of manure one year ahead. I think manure grows better by keeping. I think it is better to plough in the fall than in the spring. Mr. Perkins. — What time in the fall do you prefer to plough ? Does it make any difference whether it is the first of September or the latter part of November ? Dr. Hartwell. — I think September is the best ; but farmers must do as they can. They cannot always do the work of the farm at the time they ought to. If I had my choice I should do it in September, but October or November will answer the purpose. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 59 E. W. Bull, of Concord. — One of the most successful farmers in Concord, who grows the largest crop of corn to the acre of any man in town, but whose soil is rather low and moist, lets the grass grow until very nearly the first of June ; certainly until the season is warm and the grass has grown considerably. He hauls on not less than fifty loads to the acre, which is partly fermented, but not wholly, and ploughs it under immediately with a plough which gives a furrow of about eight inches. He harrows the surface over thoroughly and plants the corn with a little ripe compost in the hill to start its roots quickly. The season is warm, the ground is warm, the manure is warm, and the ground is soon covered with so many stalks that I think the doctor would say he would have no crop, and yet he counts positively and confidently upon fifty or sixty bushels, and is not disappointed, and his following crops are all so much the better for it. If the corn crop did not pay, in a money sense, still it is a most important fallow crop ; and since we must have a fallow crop, I think it is particularly fortunate that we have one that gives us breadstuffs. The English farmer must fallow with the turnip, but we have a fallow crop that gives us some- times fifty bushels to the acre. Harrison Garfield, of Lee. — If I wanted to raise an extra- ordinary crop of corn for one year, I should certainly pursue the same method that the doctor does ; but it is a question in my mind whether manure put on in that way will serve the best interests of the farmer in a succession of years. My experience has been that it is best not to leave the manure exposed to the rains and to evaporation any longer than is necessary. I have practised putting it on in the spring so tliat I could retain the fertilizing property of the manure, not only for the crop I put in at present, but for future crops. I should be glad to have gentlemen here, who have had a larger experi- ence than I have, express their views in relation to that point. Dr. Hartwell. — I can state one fact that will perhaps throw some light upon the question. Several years ago I ploughed an acre and a half in the fall in the manner I have described ; I proposed to make a nursery upon half of it, and I put on the manure and spread it upon the surface of the soil, but the frosts followed so soon that I was not able to work it in. I changed my mind in relation to planting a nursery, and in the 60 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. spring I spread an equal quantity of manure over the remainder of the land, and planted it all with corn. Where the manure was put on in the fall the corn was a great deal the best. I could see it in the rows, contrary to my expectation, for I expected that I had lost something on the manure. The next year the land was sowed with oats, and I could see the line where that manure came that I put on in the fall. Next year it was sown to grass, and that line was seen three years afterwards. I am not sure that there were not circumstances connected with it that I was not aware of, but that was the fact as it showed itself to my observation at the time. I tried it one year afterwards, but it was on a piece of land over which a great deal of water passed, and I lost some portion of the manure by the wash. For that reason I abandoned it ; and, as I told you, for general use I would not recommend it. It is only under peculiar circumstances, where your soil is protected from winds and washes that it will answer to leave tbe manure upon the surface. Rev. Mr. Dean. — I suppose, in discussing the question of the corn crop, it is necessary not only to look at the immediate results, but at the general results to the farm. In Orange County, New York, where I was brought up, they used to put on the manure in the spring ; but the most successful farmers argue of late that corn is a very exhausting crop, and that there is a difficulty after the rotation is complete, the grass running out in a little while ; so that I find now that the most successful farmers do not put on all their manure with the corn ; they manure to get rather below a fair crop than otherwise, and reserve a large part of their manure to put on when they put in their wheat, and then they get a very fine field of grass, and manure for the next rotation of corn, oats, &c. They manure with the clover. I should like to know whether Massachusetts farmers have any experience in that direction. Dr. Hartwell. — So far as I know, they have not. They have experience in putting manure on grass lands, and many of them like the process. But with regard to the system I have spoken of, the farmers are not in a situation to practise it. There are no farmers in our section that I know of who have retained a year's stock of manure. They would be under the -necessity of losing one year's crop of corn to get into the SECRETARY'S REPORT. 61 system. For that reason they usually put on in the spring the manure that has been made during the winter. But I certainly would recommend to every farmer who raises corn, to have one year's stock of manure on hand, if he can possibly get into that situation. Professor Agassiz. — I have no opinion to express concerning the mode of applying manure, but I would suggest some experi- ments which may be beneficial in settling the question I have heard discussed. The object of manuring the land is no doubt to furnish food to the plants. Now I would like to know what is the extent of the rootlets which grow from a stalk of corn — how deep do they go and how widely do they spread ? If your manure is to be beneficial at all it must penetrate to the extent to which the rootlets of the plant extend, and at the time those rootlets are most active. Therefore experiments ought to be made by which to ascertain how deep the effect of the manure is felt in the land after a certain time from the period when it is put on the surface. Unless you know that, you are all the time working in the dark ; and I am not aware, from the observations I have heard here, that it is positively known to the growers of corn in how much time the roots grow to such a depth, and such a depth, from each stalk, and how far, deeper and wider they extend in successive weeks or months, and how far the manure follows that growth, so as to furnish at every stage the proper nourishment to the corn. That, I believe, is one of the most interesting desiderata to the agricul- turist,— to ascertain at what rate and what extent the manure is carried down into the ground. We ought to know that for every crop. Dr. Hartwell. — I wish to say, in reply to the question of Professor Agassiz, that I know they spread over every inch of the soil ; with regard to the depth I am not able to say. "With regard to manuring upon the surface I will mention one fact. Two years ago I left a large heap of manure upon the surface of a lot before I ploughed it. It lay there about one year. When I spread this manure upon the land, knowing that where the heap lay the eartli would be so highly charged-with salts that it would be difficult to get a crop, I ordered my man to take off four inches of the surface and spread it over the rest of the field. That was a year ago this fall, for last year's crop. I 62 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. planted the field with corn. Where this heap had stood the corn looked burnt, and when the dry time came on, the surface of that ground, four inches below where the manure lay, was covered with nitre. You will find that it will permeate the soil for as much as eight or ten inches. The soil seems to have a wonderful affinity for the salts of manure. You will find that water from a manure heap, running over a ploughed field, will lose all its coloring in running a few rods, and be perfectly white. Nature always manures upon the surface. It is a question whether the benefit of manure will not always be as great placed upon the surface as in any other position. I have seen manure spread upon a gravelly knoll in a pasture, and left upon the surface of the land, and the result was most excellent. Mr. Grout. — I rise for the purpose of putting an inquiry in regard to the basis we are working upon. "We are treating of soils for the production of corn. To get that corn we are obliged, here in New England, to use manures ; and the appli- cation of manures is of course a very important item in the case, and, in connection with it, the kind of manures to be used on different soils. I should be glad to hear from Dr. Hartwell and Mr. Bull the character of the soil in the cases to which they referred. Professor Agassiz suggests a questit)n in regard to the depth to which the roots of corn penetrate. I have examined that matter myself, and I have found the roots about two inches under the surface. They do not run to a very great depth. They need the heat of the sun, and sometimes the moisture of the dews will affect the roots of the corn. They perfectly permeate the whole surface ; they reach into every particle of manure that is applied there. I once, in cultivating some potatoes, found that the roots ran nearly across the row. Thinking it would injure the crop to hoe them, I left three or four rows to see what the effect would be, and I don't think I had half as many in those rows as where I hoed. Now, the application of manure, unless we know the kinds of soil as well as the season in which it is to be applied, is like prescribing the same kind of medicine for all sorts of diseases. We cannot safely calculate upon the effect. I think we ought to understand the character and composition of the soil, and what kind of manure is required for different soils. ' Unless we SECRETARY'S REPORT. 63 know this, we cannot tell whether forty loads to the acre will produce sixty bushels of corn, or more or less ; or whether twenty loads will not produce fifty or sixty bushels to the acre. I have put on twenty-five loads to the acre, and have got over seventy bushels ; and I have applied more than that sometimes, and have not got near so much as that — say forty bushels to the acre. Now, there is a difference in seasons about that, and there may be a difference in manures that we don't know about, as well as a difference in the soil. I think all these fundamental facts should be studied, that we may have more basis to go upon. Prof. Agassiz. — The observations which have just been made show that we are in ignorance of one fact which is of the utmost importance — the depth to which rootlets grow and from which they receive nourishment. I was quite astonished to hear the gentleman's statement that they go down only two or three inches. I believe they go down several feet. Now, how is that fact to be ascertained ? It is not an easy matter. It cannot be ascertained by tearing the corn from the ground. The only way is to wash the earth away with water, using no violence whatever. If that be done, I think it will be found that the network of rootlets, which is attached to every plant of corn, has a most extensive system of ramifications ; and to what extent that goes, and what the plant can receive from these different rootlets, are essential elements in the consideration of this question. Remarks have been made concerning manuring at the sur- face as being nature's mode of manuring. No doubt it is ; but let us see to what depth this manure is carried in the course of years. Nature is every year manuring the land, by the fall of the leaf and the decay of the plants growing at the surface ; but that manure, once at thq surface, is all the time sinking down. Every new layer brings the preceding lower and lower down and we ought to know positively to what depth all that is car- ried. I have looked for that information wherever I could, and I don't think we have any information of that kind. It would be well if we began to collect it systematically, and every contribution in that direction, will, no doubt, be a benefit to agriculture. The subject was then laid upon the table, and the next topic for consideration was a lecture on 64 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. GRAPE CULTURE, BY E. W. BULL, OP CONCORD. I shall give a familiar talk upon grape culture, and try to show that it may be successfully introduced into New England, and counted upon as a constant and sure crop as confidently, and even more confidently than your apple crop. Careful inquiries instituted by Colonel Wilder, some years since, showed tliat the value of the fruit crop of Massachusetts was not less than two millions of dollars. Yet our fruit crop is rather uncer- tain. Pears only succeed constantly in sheltered locations and in a soil properly adapted to them. Apples, even, are failing, as our apple growers complain, constantly, more and more every year. From the ravages of insects, the vicissitudes of the sea- sons, and, possibly, as a committee of this Board thought they found, some years since, from neglect of the proper modes of culture — from imperfect manipulations in the nursery — in short, from various causes, the apple seems to be less certain than formerly, and our fruit crop less certain as a matter of income ; and if it ceases to be profitable, it must be given up. A friend of mine, whom I have known for years, who has four acres of as handsome apple trees as you can find in Massachusetts, told me the other day, that after fourteen years of cultivation, during the whole of which time they have been of bearing size, and have borne occasionally, he is about to cut them down, because they do not, on the whole, cover the actual expense of cultiva- tion ; and he comes to me to see whether the grape cannot be grown there, and whether, if so, it will pay. The grape is, perhaps, the most ancient fruit known to man. In periods of the most remote antiquity, ever ^nce there has been any historic record of fruit, there has been a record of grape culture ; and in all ages, it has been considered the type of human felicity to sit under the grape in peace and security. There would not be, I think, this uniform testimony to the early and continued cultivation of the grape, on the part of all writers, in all ages, had it not been considered, in all times, the best fruit grown — and that is my opinion. I am, perhaps, something of an enthusiast in the culture of the grape. I speak to you of it out of my experience of more than twenty-five years. If I speak in the first person singular so often as to lay myself open to the charge of egotism, I beg you will consider that I do it. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 65 not because I do not know it lays me open to that charge, but to avoid too much circumlocution, and to save time, of which, I have no doubt, I shall consume too much. I said that grape culture is possible in Massachusetts. I do not mean by that, that all grapes can be grown here ; but I do mean, that grapes have always been here since the hrst white man set his foot upon the soil of Massachusetts, when he found the grape so abundant that he christened the country, " Vine- land." We had, then, only to get out of this native stock, which was adapted to our climate, and perfectly hardy, a seed- ling of good quality ; we had only to break it of its old habits, in short, to make it edible, to attain the object we had in view. I do not doubt that this idea occurred to many before I took it up. The intelligent horticulturist saw it would be the work of a lifetimie, and we are a people impatient of delays ; we want our results swiftly ; and, therefore, although they saw it to be possible, and might recommend it to others, they forbore to pro- ceed themselves with a course of breeding which involved the work of a lifetime, and perhaps more. In my own case, after having grown grapes of all kinds in my garden in Boston, with great success, I found myself unable to grow them on a sunny slope where I felt sure I could do so.- What was I to do ? I loved the grape, and must have it. I might go to Pennsylvania and grow grapes, but I could not take Massachusetts with me, and I wanted Massachusetts, and I wanted the grape too. So I set about raising seedlings from this native stock, and in the second generation, I got a good grape ; and from that grape I have seedlings still better ; and from them again, I have seed- lings growing ; and I think I have established the fact that the time will come when out of these successive reproductions, you will have grapes as good as you desire, — grapes as good, perhaps, as those of any part of the world, — hardy, perfectly adapted to our climate, and which may be grown in field culture, as you grow any other crop ; for I have found the grape more certain and more constant than any other fruit crop, not excepting even the hardy currant of the garden. For twelve years, I have had the grape ripen its crop perfectly every successive year. Four years ago, on the last day of September, we had the thermometer at twenty degrees, freezing all the young wood, and all the buds which were immature, but still, under these most unfav- 9* 6Q BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. orable circumstances, which had not occurred for thirty-six years before, I had a remunerating crop of grapes. But although the hardy grapes may be grown here without difficulty, still, they prefer certain kinds of soil, they need cer- tain aspects, and certain conditions of growth, without which they will not come to perfection, without which they will not be of good quality. And let me say, in passing, that this accounts, probably, for the diverse opinions in regard to our new grapes, which are planted every year by various horticulturists, and cultivated with equal skill, as far as cultivation goes, but in regard to which the conditions necessary to the successful cul- ture of the grape have not, in all cases, been present ; so that in one instance, where these conditions are present, the grape comes up to its type, and in the other falls behind it, as to time of ripening, and of course, as to quality. The soil should be light and warm, so that the tender roots of the grape may per- meate it easily. It does not seem to be necessary in my expe- rience— although it runs counter to my former belief, and although it runs contrary to all the instructions of the books — that the soil should be rich. We are told to trench the ground and enrich it abundantly, and that nitrogenous and concentrated manures are necessary and best for the grape. It is within my knowledge, that a certain eminent grape-grower trenched his soil thirty inches, and put upon an acre of land no less than a thousand loads of manure. I think the size of the load was not stated, but a thousand, even of the smallest loads, would be an excessive quantity. On that soil, Delawares were grown six feet in length in a season, from one year vines. This seems to run counter to my experience, that grapes do not need a rich soil ; but I speak of the hardy grapes that we have here. The Delaware is a slow-growing grape. It has been traced to the garden of Mr. Prevost, in Philadelphia, a gentleman who grew foreign grapes ; and many German cultivators believe it to be a seedling of the Traminer, a German grape, growing there. It requires high feeding ; it grows slowly ; it is a child of another country, and requires more nourishment and feeding than our own more robust progeny. This is true of the foreign grape generally. If you undertake to grow it here, you must enrich the ground very much, so as to make some sort of compensation for the long season which it had in its own country of five months, SECRETAEY'S REPORT. 67 as compared with our shorter season of less than four. A light corn soil, enriched as' if for corn — that is to say, forty loads to the acre, (more or less,) compost, such as a farmer would give to it for corn, to promote the formation of the roots of the young plant, and establish it — I have found to be the best. After that, no barnyard manures are required, only mineral manures. Indeed, I have given up, from the necessity of the case, in the light of my long experience, the use of barnyard manures, and give only potashes, which are indispensable, in tlie form of wood ashes, and sulphur, which I have found to be also indispensable to the perfect health of the grape. It is a sort of medicine for all those diseases incident to the grape, growing out of bad sub- stances in the soil, or growing out of atmospheric influences or any other. I apply it in the form of gypsum, which is nearly one-half sulphur. Phosphate of lime is also indispensable. This promotes the formation of roots more than any other manure, except thoroughly decomposed cow manure, which is in some sort a substitute for bone dust, containing as it does, considerable phosphate of lime, and promoting the formation of roots, as it does, certainly in the same way and to the same extent that the phosphate of lime does. Let me say that the quantity of manure I should apply to the acre, after the vines get to bearing, would be twenty bushels of wood ashes, twenty bushels of fine bone dust, and five bushels of plaster of Paris — gypsum — sown broadcast, and worked in lightly. Once in three years, that application will be sufficient for any vineyard which is thrifty and of hardy grapes, or for any vineyard well established, to keep it up to a full crop, and to make as much wood as a grape-vine ought to make ; which wood will be solid and strong, and consequently hardy, and capable of enduring our winters. Although the soil should be perfectly adapted to the grape, you still want a good aspect. A south aspect is by universal consent the best. The grape is a child of the sun, and it wants heat — heat at the root and heat at the top. I have seen the thermometer at one hundred and four degrees, and the soil at one hundred and thirty degrees, when the thermometer was inse^rted in the sandy loam, but I have never yet seen a day so hot that it curled a leaf of the grape or seemed to have the slightest pernicious effect upon it ; on the contrary, it seemed 68 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. to enjoy it. I have never seen a day so hot that the grape did not seem to thrive all the better for that heat. All cannot have a south aspect, however ; and the next best aspect would be, in my experience, south-west ; next, south-east ; next, west ; and, lastly, east. This runs counter to the teaching of the books, and to the opinions of many horticulturists. When some eminent grape-growers came to my house, and saw a grape growing in a west aspect, they said they wondered it throve there at all ; but I invited their attention to another vine, of the same age, growing on the east side, and that on the west side, although the characteristics of the soil were less favorable, was much the best. And it seems to me there is a good reason for this. In the autumn, when the atmosphere cools in the night, the afternoon sun lies on the west side until the last moment, and that afternoon sun is of great service in carrying the grape through the night, without interrupting the flow of its juices. Climate is somewhat within your control, in this mat> ter of aspect. A south aspect, with surrounding woods, will so modify an otherwise rugged and severe climate as to be equal to a degree or two of latitude ; for although the grape does not need the protection of the woods against the winter winds, it does need all the heat it can get, as I said before ; and a vine- yard planted near woods, which interjcept the rapid currents of air which carry away the heat, you can see would be a great deal warmer than if lying in an open space. So that climate may be modified by patches of trees, and the grapes have a pro- tection equal to covering up in winter, or to a degree or two of latitude ; and many grapes which are not hardy enough for field culture, but of excellent quality, may be grown there with suc- cess, and so we may increase the variety of grapes we grow, and have some grapes, with that degree of protection, which otherwise we could not have. Protection, although by some of our grape- growers believed to be indispensable, even to our hardy grape, implies so much labor and expense, and at a time when every farmer is so busy that he will be pretty sure to neglect it, or not be able to give it to the vines, would be such a drawback to the field culture of the grape, that it would, probably, never prevail largely in Massachusetts, where labor is so costly. I know that in Europe, in some districts, near the north line of grape culture, they do take down and protect their vines in winter. But labor SECRETARY'S REPORT. 69 is cheap, the grape interest is the ruling interest, the most pro- fitable interest, and they think they can afford to do it, and they do do it; but our people, I think, would not. Now, in my judgment, protection is never needed where a hardy grape is used, and where it is properly cultivated, in which case its wood will be ripe and solid and capable of enduring the winter better than in the other case. And what is proper cultivation ? Simply that the vine shall be kept in perfect healtli, and not pushed so fast with stimulat- ing manures that the tissues of the wood will be loose, spongy, and in short, unripe. I have seen the shoots of an oak tree, which stopped growing in the spring, from drought, but started again in August, with the late rains, and grew long, killed by the severe winter frosts, showing that even the hardiest of plants must have its wood well ripened to endure the winter. Some grapes which are believed to be tender are positively hardy when grown in this way ; but almost everybody grows the grape with so much stimulating manure that the wood is not thoroughly ripe and hard, and so those which are by nature a little tender, die utterly, and even those which are hardy, with proper cul- ture, lose some of their wood. You can see, I think, that with this method of cultivation which I- have suggested, the grape would not be likely to make too much wood. If it made no more than half a yard, or twelve inches of wood — thoroughly well ripened wood — with well developed buds, you might be content. But you would find, in growing the grape, or any- thing, indeed, that the rule for pruning would lie in this : that if you have great power at the root, you must have a corres- ponding extension of top. There must be a proper -balance between the root and the top. If there be too much top, the growth will be meagre, and the crop meagre. The remedy would be, of course, to cut back severely. But if, on the other hand, your grape was growing with such luxuriance as to get out of hand and crowd the trellis where you did not want it, and you kept cutting it. back severely, the difficulty would only be continued from year to year, and you would have wood, not fruit. So it happens that some of the most prolific vines we have, do not, under some circumstances, bear ; but on inquiring, you will usually find that they have grown with such vigor, t 70 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. they have made such an enormous quantity of wood, that the formation of fruit buds was impossible. But I did not mean to speak of pruning immediately. I was speaking of planting, a subject on which, it seems to me, to be important that we should talk plainly, because so many arc planting grapes, and so many are likely to be misled by the old practice, and by the written instructions copied from books, in regard to trenching, manuring, and excessive feeding, which would probably cheat them of success instead of giving them success. In planting the grape, as I said before, in regard to manure, I should prepare the land as if for corn. I should plant in rows north and south ; the rows ten feet apart, the vines six feet apart in the row, so that you would have wide rows to work in with your plough, your cultivator, and your cart for gathering the crop ; and, the plants being six feet apart, you have sixty square feet for each plant, or about seven hundred and twenty- six plants to the acre. Planted at this distance, strong growing vines will be close enough. I have tried all the various distances recommended by the books, and I find that our strong growing, native stock requires more room than the foreign grapes. Half a rod each way, which has been recommended, would be a very good distance; but the method of placing the rows ten feet apart, thus facilitating and cheapening the culture, seems to me to be better, and therefore I adopt it. There is another reason for this mode of planting, and that is, that the sun may lie upon the ground between the rows and heat the earth down to the deepest roots, in the middle of the day. If your espalier is six feet high, you will be able to gather your grapes, by this method, very easily ; and perhaps it is the best method. When you plant, keep in view the fact that the grape wants heat at the root, and that, if put too deeply into the soil, they will not get that heat at the root which they need ; and that other fact, that in dry soil they must not be so near the surface as to cause them to suffer from the summer drought. You will plant them about six inches deep. The roots should be spread in every direction carefully, and never left crossing each other ; for if they cross each other the sap is intercepted, and the roots do not perform their functions for the grapes. Having planted them and covered them carefully* with the hoe, I should not SECRETARY'S REPORT. 71 touch them again that season, any further than to keep down the weeds in the row. The reason for this is plain. All the leaves which these branches contain help to make roots, do make roots. The more foliage you have on your vine, the more root you will have at the end of the season ; and since you will in any event prune back closely at the end of the first year, I would by no means pinch the growing shoots in the summer. Your vine will then be left to run about upon the ground, and to be blown about by the wind ; for every movement of the branch facilitates the vegetable processes going on in the plant, as has been found by experience ; and, in fact, writers on horti- culture, in the magazines of this day, recommend this very mode, which I have used for ten or twelve years, as the result of my experience, and which I recommend to you as not only the best way, but the one involving the least trouble. When you have got to the end of the first year, you want to begin to shape the vine,'and therefore you cut it back to a single stem, which you leave of greater or less length, accord- ing to the strength of the stem. It should be not less than twelve or fifteen inches from the ground, to facilitate culture about the grape, the hoeing, weeding, &c. If you train upon the espalier, your first wire will be eighteen or twenty inches from the earth, which is low enough to lay out the lower or first branches for fruiting ; and therefore you will leave your main stem of that height. For training upon poles, twelve inches will be enough. As this is always to be the main stem of the grape, no other growth can be allowed from the bottom. From that main stem you train your branches. If you prefer training on poles, then two systems of pruning occur to you, the renewal system and spur pruning. If spur pruning is to be adopted, one pole is sufficient ; if the renewal system, two poles are required, and you must train the wood alternately on one pole and the other. The objection to the renewal system, in my mind, is this : that on the long shoot, which you will leave, although it may be covered with well-ripened buds, you are' not sure of getting good bunches of fruit throughout the whole length. The sap rushes to the end of the upright branch, and pushes the buds there first. The bunches are largest there ; the bunches below that point start later. I am aware that when the root is large, and the vine has attained its utmost 72 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. vigor, it will have sufficient strength to push all these huds, and give you hunches of equal size ; but in the early period, for three, four or five years, you will find in the renewal system, the best bunches at the .top, and the meagre and less valuable on the lower part of the stem, therefore I prefer spur pruning. Spur pruning means leaving the shoots of the current year in short spurs of three or four eyes, on each side of the old wood for the next year's bearing ; cutting out alternate spurs to one eye, to make new wood for the next year's bearing ; when you will cut back those spurs which have borne fruit this year to one eye to make bearing spurs for the next year, thus keeping all your spurs near to the old wood and avoiding unsightly stubs. It is the easiest mode of cultivating and pruning ; when once well established, an intelligent boy, fourteen years old, can prune your vineyard as well as yourself. Usually, the fruit ripens a little earlier on the spur ; and there seems to be a good reason for that, because you have cut away all but three eyes, and they were the eyes which were first pruned, and are, there- fore, the most solid and well-ripened ; and being nearer the main stem, the sap does not have to traverse so long an extent of wood to reach the fruit. You would, I think, in the summer, find it profitable to pinch excessive growth ; and it would be a safe rule to pinch whenever a shoot had grown, say twelve inches, perhaps sooner with short-jointed wood ; and wood will be shorter or longer jointed, according as the stimulus at the root pushes that wood with more or less vigor. If you have just the right quantity of root to support the vine, the wood will be short-jointed ; it will have its eyes three or four inches apart ; if you feed it excessively, the joints may be twelve inches apart. The long joint is objectionable. It shows you have pushed your wood too fast, the buds are not so strong and the wood not so solid. You would find, therefore, in spur pruning the advantage of having the first ripened wood and the first developed buds. As to the time of pruning, November is the best season. Having, at the end of the first year, got your main stem estab- lished, you would lead, if in pole culture, one stem from it, if in trellis culture, two stems, which would be tied on to the espalier diagonally, at an angle of forty-five degrees say, and pinched occasionally, that the wood might be made robust aild SECRETARY'S REPORT. 73 solid. No matter if your grape does not grow — and some kinds will not — more than twelve inches in a season, still I would pinch the terminal bud, that tlic others might be consolidated and made robust. With rapid-growing vines, six feet of wood would be made, perhaps ; still, you would pinch at every twelve inches, so as to make sure of solid wood, and strong, well-devel- oped buds. This brings you to the third year. In the third year, you will cut back these laterals, these diagonal arms, to a strong bud, though it take you back very near their base ; for these arms are to remain in the future, and be the vine which may continue, perhaps, for a century, if properly cared for ; for the grape is one of the longest-lived of all fruits, if cultivated with care. There are specimens in this country with a diameter of trunk of twenty-four inches, and "which were believed by Downing to be two thousand years old. You want to proceed, therefore, as if your vine were to remain there forever ; you want to make that wood solid and enduring; and, therefore, you will cut back these diagonal arms at the end of the first year of their growth to a strong bud and to solid wood, though it take you very near their base. The next year, being the third year from planting, the spur which you have left will give you some fruit. You will have seen, probably, that your vines are strong, well established, and capable of carrying a crop — a light crop — the first crop. If they are weak, for any reason, they should not be cropped that year, or ever, until they get well established. But if well established the third year, you may take your first crop ; and you may safely take, with the Concord, for instance — which is the grape I have planted in field culture, five pounds of grapes to the vine. The spurs will usually set three bunches ; pinch the growing wood at the first bud beyond the last bunch, and cut away one or two of the bunches, leaving the strongest, so that the vine may not carry more than five pounds. At the autumn pruning cut back the first spur to three eyes, the second and third to one eye each, and the fourth spur, which will be opposite to the first, to three eyes. The spurs left with one eye each make your bearing wood of next year. The spurs of three eyes, which bear this year, will be cut back, at the end of the season, to one eye, to make bearhig wood the next year for successive fruiting. By 10* 74 BOAKD OF AGRICULTURE. this method you annually alternate your spurs and keep the bearing wood close to the main stem. If, for any reason, your spurs are weak, cut them back one eye to make strong wood for the next year's bearing, — never fruit a weak spur. Suppose you have too much wood ; there is but one remedy, and that is, to withhold all feeding of any kind until the crop, to which the strength of the vine goes, has exhausted the vine sufficiently to bring it to its proper balance. A too strong vine will sometimes take four or five years to attain that balance ; and, as I have said before, you will know what that is by the fact, that when you have the true proportion between root and branch the new wood will be not more than two feet and a half in length, with short joints and full buds. Your vine is then in a state of perfect balance, and in the proper condition to give you its best crop. Pole culture, you perceive, would be the same thing, except that, in the renewal system by two poles, these arms are cut close to the main stem alternately, — one this year, we will say, and the other the next. Usually, one of these spurs shoots one eye, and the other two. If both grow, you will take out the weakest, and train up the strongest on the pole. Though you have two new shoots for the current year, at the end of the season you will cut one of those out close to the main stem, and the other one you will cut down to the point where the wood has ripened buds, well enough developed to bear your fruit. Now, you have got one shoot for bearing fruit, and one spur for making wood, the succeeding year. The one that is to bear fruit goes to the top of the pole and bears its fruit, and that which is to make wood, makes new buds and new wood, to bear fruit the next year, and so on alternately. That is the renewal system which is adopted at the West, in growing the Catawba grape ; but many of the growers are now going into the espalier culture, as on the whole the most economical, and certainly the best, as giving two long arms of bearing wood, which do not need to be constantly renewed, and giving annually larger crops than are obtained with the pole culture ; and, lastly, saving the trouble of perpetually renewing the poles, which must be renewed every second or third year, while the espalier does not need to be renewed oftener than once in ten or twelve years. SECKETARY'S REPORT. 75 But at the base of all this pruning lies the great fact, that if you have too much root power, you cannot handle the top, and, therefore, you must not feed your vine too much. If it will bear a little more feeding, give it to it afterwards, so as to make the vine grow to the size you want ; but if you have too much root power, you must let the top grow, and it may be in many cases impossible to give it proper extension ; certainly it would be in vhieyard culture, after it had filled your espalier. If, now, you have your vineyard, or your vines in open field culture, you will look the third year for your first crop ; and you may take, as I have already said, from well established vines — those vines which are in good health, and making their half a yard or two feet of new wood annually — five pounds to the vine, safely. Much more has been taken, without apparent harm, but in presenting to you these facts out of my experience, I take the sure and safe side, that you may not be disappointed. Although I might state much more extravagant results, much larger crops which I know to have been taken in successive years from young vines, I forbear to recommend such a course to you, because, when you begin the culture of the grape, I want you to have absolute success and long-continued success, and this method will insure it to you. You may take, then, five pounds to the vine the first year ; the next year, ten pounds to the vine ; the third year, of cropping, you may take fifteen pounds to the vine ; the next year, and from that time forward, you may take twenty pounds annually to the vine. I know a piece of ground, of such soil as I have described, in the town where I live, and belonging to townsman of mine, which for three successive years has given crops exceeding this estimate largely, without any application whatever since they were planted, seven years ago, but wood ashes, at the rate of fourteen bushels to the acre. It is not liberal to the vineyard, it is not fair treatment of the vines, to crop them in such a heavy way, nor do I believe that in the end it will be so profitable to the vineyard owner ; but it is true that the very first crop taken from this vineyard was at the rate of nearly three tons to the acre ; the second crop was at the rate of seven tons to the acre ; and the crop he took from it this year, being the third crop, without enriching in any way, was at the rate of eight tons to the acre. These are excessive crops, and not to be counted on 76 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. always. AtKelley's Island, where they grow the best Catawbas, they boast of a crop of three and a half tons to the acre, as if it was a large crop ; and it is a large crop. But you are to remem- ber that that grape has a constitutional defect — the rot — always weakening it more or less, and sometimes excessively, otherwise it might, perhaps, give the same weight. Your first crop would be at the rate of more than 3,500 pounds to the acre ; your second crop, 7,000 pounds ; your third crop, over 10,000 ; your fourth, 14,000 pounds, or seven tons to the acre. I have shown you that that crop has been exceeded for three successive years, from a vineyard treated as I have described. I think I may assume, therefore, that this would be a reliable annual crop. Some of the vines in the vineyard I have spoken of, bore thirty- five pounds this year. I have estimated twenty pounds to the vine as a full crop, and that will give you in round numbers, seven tons of grapes as the usual crop. Now, can anything be more profitable than grape culture ? I have endeavored to show you that grape culture is absolutely certain, under certain conditions. They are conditions within the reach of any man within Massachusetts. That it is more profitable than any other crop is within my experience ; and that it is more sure and constant than any other crop is also within my experience, for I have for many years never failed of a crop. Now, how shall we get still better grapes ? for that is the problem before us. Chance seedlings, or grapes bred from tender, though excellent varieties, and inheriting the tender constitutions incident to the family to which they belong, will never do for field culture, though they may do for the amateur. We want yet better grapes, and I think we may have as good grapes as those of any other country in time, if we only go about raising them intelligently from seed. Constant reproduc- tion from seedlings having the indispensable qualities of hardi- hood, vigor of growth, adaptation to the season and vicissitudes of climate, will give us still better grapes than we now possess. I will give you some of the results of my own experience in that direction, in tlie hope that some of you will take up this really national work, that our final success may be more rapidly achieved ; for the seeds of the same grape would show greater variation from the original type when grown in various soils and SECRETARY'S REPORT. 77 aspects, than upon the soil where it originated, when all the conditions of soil, climate and culture were the same always. Beginning with the wild grape — the best I could find — the earliest, having also those qualities which I have endeavored to describe to you ; I got, from tlic seedlings of that grape, first the mother of the Concord ; second, out of that seedling, the Concord ; out of the seeds of tlie Concord, many new grapes, nearly a score of which are great improvements over the Con- cord ; so that the pulp, which is one of the distinguishing char- acteristics of our native grape, is lost, and you have a grape of tender and delicate texture throughout, like the hot-house grape ; so that tlie wild flavor so objectionable to us is lost, and there is now no sign of wildness about it. Indeed, I venture to say, that if I were to show you several of these new grapes at this time, and tell you they were seedlings of hot-house grapes, you would assent to it. So far as the texture, appearance, and even the flavor are concerned, you would say, " These are better than any of our native grapes," and that the foreign grape must always be the best. I could deceive you, I think, into that con- clusion, so great is the improvement. From these, again, I have seedlings now two years grown. In five years they will come to fruit, and I shall have a new point of departure. I know it requires patience, and some enthusiasm, on the part of a man to grow seedling grapes and wait six years for the first fruit ; and when he has got his first fruit, perhaps it is not so good as he expects ; but if it is pretty good, if it is an improve- ment, if for any reason it is worth saving at all, let him count confidently on its improving for several years, from year to year, for that is the uniform result. The fruit of the first year is not so good as that of the next, other things being equal, and it grows better and better for several years. I plucked this year, on the twentieth day of August, one white seedling grape, and one black seedling from seedling vines planted ten years ago. And that brings me to the consideration of a point I ought to have mentioned before, relating to climate. The grape wants heat at the time of ripening the fruit. Now, if it be late, ripening when the early frosts have come, and our nights have grown cool, and our days foggy and cold, it cannot be so good. It will not ripen so much in two weeks of such weather as it would in four days of absolutely hot, clear weather, such as we 78 BOARD OP AGRICULTURE. have ill the latter part of August and early in September. Therefore you want an early ripening grape, if it be possible ; but if your seedling be a little late, or if the weight or the quality does not come quite up to your expectations, by reason of the circumstances I have just mentioned, do not reject it altogether ; but if it be worth keeping at all, count upon its being, in a more favorable season, like this last, much better. As to soil affecting the quahty of the grape, I ought to say a word. It does. The best grapes are grown in the sweetest and best soil. That is to say, soil naturally sweet of itself and fed with such vegetable and animal manures as do not convey to it disagreeable odors ; for the soil takes odor, and the grape takes odor from the soil. I know that absolutely, for, having applied some wool waste to some young seedling vines which I wanted to get rapidly forward, — seedlings which had borne once, and of which I wanted to see a second crop, — which wool waste was unc- tuous with fat and grease, will you believe it when I tell you that I found the abominable flavor of that half decayed wool waste in my grape in the autumn, and so did everybody who tasted it. The grape abhors foul odors. It is a dainty feeder. Although it will bear so much feeding, under certain circumstances, yet it absolutely needs, in my judgment, only that peculiar kind of feeding which comes from vegetable debris and those minerals which its constitution requires. I have recommended the raising of seedlings by direct descent for two reasons ; because, in the first place, hybridization is so difficult ; and because, in the next place, when you hybridize the finer grapes known to us now, which are tender grapes, upon the more hardy mother grape, to get the quality of the better grape and the hardiliood of the mother grape, we are not quite sure of success. It is a hybrid, and must always be ; and although it may have more of the hardy constitution of the mother than of the tender constitution of the higher flavored and better male parent, still, it will have a constitutional pre- disposition to tenderness ; and though you may possibly get a grape which will bear the climate, it is more than likely that in that event, you have not a true hybrid, — that is, a hybrid that is accepted without dispute as a true hybrid, — that is hardy. I know that Mr. Rogers has raised some hybrid grapes which are of good quality, and great acquisitions, as I think ; but I SECRETARY'S REPORT. believe the savants in horticulture, many of them, at least, and more from day to day, have come to the conclusion that they are not hybrids at all ; and that is my opinion. I conclude so for this reason. These hybrids were raised from a seedling grape and the Hamburgh and other hot-house grapes. Now, the seedling grape is itself an improvement on the native grape, and these seedlings are in the second generation from the original native stock, and hold the same relation, therefore, to the native that my Concord holds. ' He has done just what I have done : broken the habit of a wild grape, and improved it to that stage that led him to think he had got a true hybrid. Let us look at this matter a moment. The grape is perfect in its flowers. Each flower contains the male and female organs, and is covered by a calyx. When the stamen is elongated, this little calyx is thrown off", under the stimulus of the sunshine, and in that act the pollen, which is thoroughly ripe and effloresced, impregnates the germ. Now, if you are going to hybridize, how will you know whether that has happened or not ? Why, you must sit and watch the blossom as it throws off" this little calyx. You must have a large magnifier to see whether the pollen was effloresced and has impregnated the germ, or whether it is hard, close, and not ripe. If ripe, you cannot impregnate that germ, although you have the pollen ready. But if you find one, the pollen of which is not ripe, but where it is close and hard, that germ you may touch with the prepared pol- len, after cutting away all the weak parts, and you have a true hybrid. It is not, you see, impossible, but it is very difficult. I spent a fortnight in my hot-house, with my daughter, from nine o'clock in the morning until four in the afternoon, impreg- nating a Concord which I had there for that purpose. I had not the least idea that it was a work of so much difficulty and so nearly impossible as it proved to be. Hybridization, therefore, is not impossible, but I do not believe it would be practicable. How- ever, if I wanted to hybridize, I think I would do this : I would take the very best hardy grape, which had the properties which I wanted to get in the progeny, and impregnate it from another grape which had other properties, a union of which would give me just what I wanted. In other words, both being perfectly hardy, I would go to all this trouble to hybridize, in order to get the 80 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. result I aimed at more speedily, — that is to say, the properties of both parents into one seedling, which should be perfectly hardy. But I have shown you that you would be more likely to reach your aim directly by raising seedlings ; and for your encouragement I would say, that I raised two thousand before I got anything to surpass the Concord, but since then, of a thousand seedlings, over one hundred have proved to be good ; so that one hundred seedlings would be likely to give you at least ten good grapes. Now, I want your help. I have given my life to this work, not solely for the benefit of others, not alone for a selfish pur- pose, but because I must do it. The enthusiasm which has animated me in regard to grape culture for thirty-five years does not abate, but increases with increasing years ; and so long as I live, I shall go on with my work. But I must depart, and if somebody does not follow it up, we shall never have what we ought to have, — an American grape which shall excel all others. Gentlemen, I thank you for the patience with which you have listened to me so long. Mr Lathrop moved a vote of thanks to Mr. Bull for his able and interesting lecture. Prof. Agassiz seconded the motion, and said : I cannot express how delighted I have been with it. I am a child of the vineyard, and I know how important it is to a country to have vineyards to grow wine, and what advantage to a people it is to have sound wine, and to be able in that way to drive out all intoxicating liquors. It is the most excellent temperance movement that was ever started on this continent, and I believe that Mr. Bull will be a benefactor to his country by what he is doing. The vote of thanks passed unanimously. Mr. Phinney, of Barnstable, moved the addition of two mem- bers to the committee on the Agricultural College, which motion prevailed ; and the chair appointed Messrs. Phinney and Stockbridge to the committee. Dr. LoRiNG. — It is very doubtful whether the question in regard to the corn crop will be discussed again. It was pretty well discussed this morning, but I wish to propose two questions for the consideration of the meeting and for its action. No doubt the mind of every man is made up in regard to them. The first question is : Would you plough sward land and put SECRETARY'S REPORT. 81 the manure on the surface, in autumn, for a corn crop ? The other is : Would you plough sward land in the spring and turn under the manure for a corn crop ? Mr. TiDD. — It seems to me that the diversity of opinion in respect to this matter arises, in some measure, from the differences in soil. Dr. LoRiNGc — I proposed the questions with the express pur- pose of having some explanation of that sort go with the dis- cussion. I am satisfied that each gentleman would vote on these questions according to the character of the soil he is called upon to cultivate. Mr Bull. — The question, even in the simple form in which it has been presented, involves so many considerations of soil and climate, heat and moisture, and succeeding crops, that I would rather have it laid over for future consideration than to take a vote upon it now. Dr. Hartwell. — I should rather object to this Board of Agri- culture undertaking to decide as to the best method of applying manure, and have it circulated through the Commonwealth for the farmers to follow, perhaps to their disadvantage. It seems to me we should hesitate until we have further light. We are not prepared, now, to make so important a decision. The questions proposed by Dr. Loring were laid on the table, and the meeting adjourned till afternoon. Afternoon Session. — The Board met at two o'clock, and took up the subject of the improvement of pasture lands. Mr. Anderson, of Shelburne, was called upon to open the discussion. He said : I came here with no expectation of giving my experience. It is true that grass-growing and stock-raising, which are intimately connected, are the principal objects of my labor, the things I take the greatest interest in, and, in fact, that I profess to know the most about, but to give my views, unac- customed as I am to speaking, will be difficult. Some thirty years ago I commenced farming. Formerly I was engaged in teaching, but my health failed, and my physician told me I must seek some other employment. I accordingly left, and went on a farm. At first, I was not able to labor more 11* 82 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. than two or three hours a day, but I soon found I was improving. My object was, originally, to recruit my health and go back to teaching, but I soon became satisfied that in order to enjoy health, it was necessary for me to continue this active employ- ment. I went on a farm of some two hundred acres, probably as unpromising as any in the county of Franklin. It had been worn out by ploughing and raising grain. To begin with, they raised wheat as long as they could, and then corn and rye. The pastures were ploughed as long as they would produce anything ; and when I went on to it, the probability is that ten head of cattle was all it would support. The pastures were covered with bushes, brakes, and every kind of noxious vege- table that is entirely useless to the farmer. I commenced with mowing the sweet fern. My neighbors told me that it was labor lost ; that where I mowed one bush ten would spring up. But, to begin with, I knew something of the laws of vegetable life ; I knew that cutting down a vegetable and destroying its leaves, which are its lungs, must eventually kill it. These ferns were thick and large, and after mowing them I raked them into bunches and burnt them, so as to leave the ground entirely clear to mow over the second time. When they came up the second time I could go over it with a common scythe and mow it as fast as I could grass, and faster, too. The third year there were but very few left ; and the fourth year they were all gone ; and this land, that was covered by this kind of vegetable, is now the richest and best of pasture land. After disposing of these, I went at the brakes. I mowed them down, and kept them mowed down, and destroyed them, so that there is scarcely a brake on the land. My idea of the improvement of pasture land is that the main thing is to clear every noxious and useless vegetable out of the way, and let the grasses have a chance to grow, and they will take care of themselves. Another thing I am satisfied of, is, that if land is let alone, it will recuperate itself ; that nature's operations are the surest and best. I never would plough land for pasture or for mowing, where the surface is smooth and free from water. On some portions of this pasture, where there were strawberry vines, the " five-finger," so called, white grass, and different kinds of vegetables that stock will not eat, I sowed plaster. TJie effect of that was to start the clover and other SECRETARY'S REPORT. 83 grasses ; and when the clover starts on land where this white grass grows, the cattle will eat the clover and pull up this grass. After you once get your pasture lands into good condition, there is no further trouble ; that is, if you c^o not feed them too close. It is a law of nature, that the root must be somewhat in propor- tion to the top. You will always observe, m pastures that are close fed, that the roots extend but a short distance. If you will allow the grasses to grow, they will penetrate the earth and answer the purpose of subsoiling. Clover is one of the best vegetables for this purpose ; it penetrates to a great distance. The Canada thistle has been considered as one of the greatest curses to the farmer ; but I consider it a benefit to our farms. There is no vegetable that penetates so deeply and leaves the soil in so good a condition as this does, and it is not very difficult to get rid of it when you want to. Where they grow very vigorously their roots, of course, extend in proportion. The probability is that their roots extend three or four feet in a deep soil ; and if the soil is not deep they will deepen it ; and after they have left the soil, they leave a considerable amount of vegetable matter to enrich it. This farm that I have been on, and have attempted to improve, would not carry through the summer, when I took it, more than ten head of good cattle. The probability is that the value of the stock when I went on the farm was not more than five hundred dollars. To-day I would not take four thousand dollars for my stock. I have forty head, and I believe they would sell for that at auction. Well, there has been no mystery about the matter. I have let nature work. To be sure the soil is naturally of a good quality ; but it looked as poor as any soil could look, judging from the grass and everything else it produced. Mr. Lathrop. — I would like to inquire how you get rid of the Canada thistle. Mr. Anderson. — When they are in full bloom, I cut them off. If they are mowed about this time, the stalks, which are hollow become filled with water, and they do not grow again. I have found that in two or three mowings I got rid of them. But if you have to mow them every year they will abundantly compen- sate you for the labor. 84 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. « Leander Wetherell, of Boston. — I simply wish to say that I had the pleasure, this past autumn, of going over the pastures Mr. Anderson has spoken of, and the results which he has stated seem to have been fully realized ; for I have not been on any pastures that I was so well pleased with since I was on the Ken- tucky blue-grass pastures, of which his reminded me. I was there about the first of October, and they were then covered with an excellent crop of grass, notwithstanding the dryness of the past season. Mr. Anderson stated to me one fact, which he has not. mentioned here, and that is, that in the spring he goes over the pastures and beats the droppings of the animals to pieces, so that they are scattered over the surface of the ground. That is a labor to which but few farmers would subject them- selves. Now that I am up, I would add that plaster will recuperate pastures where it will work. I asked a gentleman, who lives in the town of Hardwick, in the county of Worcester, where the pastures are very good, how they compared with what they were twenty-five years ago. " Well," said he, " I can say that they are better ; that these dairy pastures will keep more stock now than twenty-five years ago." This, 1 suppose, is explained by the fact that plaster works well on those pastures ; and having been applied occasionally it has kept them in this growing and luxuriant condition. But then, there are many acres of pasture in this Commonwealth, where j^laster will produce no more effect than so much sand sown upon the surface. These pastures must be recuperated in some other way. I agree fully in the remark made by Mr. Anderson, that pasture land that can be depended on for grass is better and more enduring if it has never been ploughed or harrowed, than land that has been broken up. I have observed an illustration of this on a hill in the east part of Ware, where the land was tilled, and bore excellent crops ; afterwards, it was seeded down and turned to pasturage ; and that pasture is now a great deal inferior to a pasture right by its side, that never has been ploughed, I believe that the same is true with regard to mowing lands. I consider land that is in a condition to produce grass naturally, and that has never been ploughed, the most profitable mowing land, as the other is the most profitable pasture land. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 85 With regard to the mode of destroyhig buslics, I can give you a fact that came under my own observation. A pasture was grown over with elders and white birches, which were cut close to the ground, raked up and burnt, and then plaster was sown on the ground. There was hardly any grass to be seen at that time, but a good crop of grass immediately came in ; and after a second cutting of the bushes, tlicre was no more cutting to be done. I think it is true, that if you can make grass grow you will destroy the brush,, and if you cut the brush low, and often, if necessary, I think you will find that with the aid of plaster, or some other fertilizer, you will remove the bushes, and produce a good grass crop. Mr. Anderson. — I will say, that I think no labor bestowed on my farm pays so well as this knocking to pieces and pulverizing as fine as possible the droppings of the cattle. Pastures that were very uneven when I began this operation have been made smooth as mowing land, by spreading these droppings. Another thing that I have attended to a great deal, is the removal of stone. Our pastures are stony. On some of them, it would seem as though the surface was covered with stone. When I began to pull up these stone, one of my neighbors came along and said : " You are injuring your land ; your labor is worse than useless. Those stone warm the land, and stony land will produce more feed." Well, I paid but little attention to it, because, as far as my experience went, the grass around stones was not more luxuriant than it was at a distance, but generally the reverse. Then land that is covered with stones will not stand drought so well as land that is free from them. Stone, from the very nature of the substance, absorbs caloric, and heats the soil. I had always observed that stony land dried first ; and before I commenced this operation, our pastures suffered from drought more than neighboring pastures. After removing these stone, and encouraging the grass to extend to a deeper depth, these pastures suffered less than any of the same character. The Chairman. — Mr. Anderson has certainly advanced some ideas that are valuable. Whether they are applicable to the whole Commonwealth is a question. I should like to hear from some gentlemen who have had experience in this matter. His statement that he can raise more grass upon his pastures with- 86 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. out the plough than with it, is a very important one to discuss practically. 'Mr. Lathrop. — The best piece of pasture that I have, is a piece from which the timber was cleared in 1840. In the winter of 1850, the cord wood was drawn off. The sprouts were then four or five feet high. Next year I cleared them off, and sowed plaster at the rate of one hundred pounds to the acre. That pasture will summer a cow to the acre, on the average. It is now covered with white clover and Kentucky blue-grass. My other pastures were covered, some sixty years ago, with small pines. These were cleared off and plaster sown, and the grass commenced growing very luxuriantly. The owner, who had six hundred acres, could hardly buy cattle enough to eat up his feed, whereas he had formerly been obliged to send his young stock away to pasture. We take pains to mow our brakes and Canada thistles, for we are not so fortunate as Mr. Anderson, and find that no grass will grow up among the thistles. I can only say, that we attribute the improvement of our pastures more to plaster than anything else. I should not plough woodland, nor burn it, but let the leaves and small brush remain to enrich the soil. Mr. Wetherell. — Some twenty years ago, the Essex County Society put forth the inquiry, whether plaster exhausted the lands. There was a gentleman in our village who had a plaster mill, and I knew his way was to use his plaster quite freely on his land. I went to him and asked him, " How long has your pasture been plastered ?" " For some over thirty years ; some- times once a year, and sometimes twice." " Well, what was the condition of that land previous to the application of the plaster?" "I had six acres, and could barely keep one cow. I have reduced it down to about four acres, and keep a horse, a yoke of oxen, two cows, and sometimes a calf." And that pasture will do the same thing now. I think if plaster would exhaust land, that would have been exhausted long since. Asa Clement, of Dracut. — The pasture land in our locality has deteriorated within my recollection greatly, and it has been a part of my study, at least, to learn to improve my own pastures. I have come this conclusion, that it is, as has just been remarked, bad policy to burn upon our soils, when there is so little vegetable matter in them. If you must burn at all, SECRETARY'S REPORT. 87 let it be in a very slight manner. I recollect that last year I cleared a piece of new ground. There were some white pine and elders on it, and I burnt the brush that was scattered over the surface. I did not pile it up, but let the fire run over the sur- face very lightly ; and very soon I saw bunches of white clover coming up, and by autumn, it had nearly covered the ground. Then again, I have been accustomed to mow the bushes and brakes, and all noxious weeds and vegetables, and let them lie upon the surface and decay. I would, a? a general thing, repudiate the idea of burning brush upon our shallow soils. There may be exceptions, however. We have found, on many of our pastures, that the labor of keeping down the brush, and the white birches and alders, has been more trouble than the feed we got has been worth ; and consequently, some of us have let our older pastures grow up to white birch. To be sure, it is not the best quality of wood, but we can always sell it for something — for all it is worth perhaps — and clear new lands. These new lands produce fine, sweet feed, and if the brush is left to decay upon the surface, good white clover will come in, and will last, there is no doubt, a great while. Mr. Anderson. — I would like to inquire in regard to the dryness or moisture of the pastures. Mr. Clement. — A portion of this soil is dry. In some places there are what we call " runs " through it, that are tolerably moist, and the white birches that grow up become quite sizable trees in a few years. On the knolls where the soil is thinner and poorer, the trees are dwarfish, and will die down before they become useful for fuel. Ordinarily, we can spade down two feet very comfortably. There is a hard-pan twenty inches or two feet below the surface. A good deal of it is none too wet ; and last year these knolls looked as though they had been burnt over. Dr. Hartwell. — Gentlemen have been speaking of those pastures that are improved by the application of plaster. There is a kind of land in Worcester County that plaster improves ; there is another kind that it makes no impression upon whatever. Clayey, moist soils are improved very much by the apj)lication of plaster. The diluvial, or drift soil, with the gravel which overlays, in some instances, this formation, is never improved by plaster. You will find that there are pasture lauds where 88 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. the upheaved rock abounds in sulphur. These lands are not improved at all by plaster. I have one pasture which plaster improves and one Avhich it does not improve. The latter I have improved with ashes or manure. I know of no way of improv- ing a pasture of that kind except by giving it some foreign aid, aside from plaster, to bring it up. Tlie method I pursued with one pasture was to mow off the bushes and dress it over with compost. That will certainly bring in any kind of grass, whether you sow it or not. ^ Horse manure, sown upon the surface, is death to these bushes ; they can't stand cultivation ; and if you can manure these pastures so far as to bring in a crop of any grass thtit the cattle will eat, you will be sure to drive oil all the old buslies. The grasses, such as clover, June grass, and red- top, leave out in the ground ; all the great sour plants leave out high ; and, as I said, if you continue to cut the plant below the leaf, you are sure to kill it. We have not the means of bring- ing up many of these old pastures, for the supply of manure is limited ; but all those lands that are improved by plaster can be improved, because the amount of plaster of Paris is unlimited. Lands which will be improved by plaster are worth more than double, I think, what those lands are that plaster will not improve. The only way to do with those old pastures that we have not the means of bringing up is to let them go back to wood. They can be renovated in that way, and it is the only way in which a great portion of the waste pasture land in this Commonwealth can be restored to advantage. Mr. Wright, of Deerfield. — My experience in reclaiming pas- tures is exceedingly limited. Some ten years ago, I purchased a portion of a field (fourteen acres,) which had been used, before I bought it, to pasture two cows. ^ I had the impression that it could be improved. I hired the pasture the hrst year, to exper- iment upon it somewhat. I was satisfied, from the result of one year's operations, that there could be an improvement made. I purchased it, and my neighbors joked me severely upon the exorbitant price I paid for it. Probably no man in the neigh- borhood would have given half the amount I paid for it. I paid twenty-seven dollars an acre, and it had, within two or three years previous, been sold for ten dollars, but I could not obtain it for any less. The year I came into possession, I put in three cows. Two of my neighbors were at my place, talking about SECRETARY'S REI'r)U1\ 80 the purdiasc, and tlicy said Llicy Lliou;:,liL 1 had o-of, my place pretty well stocked ; that they didn't bulicve the pasture wouhl carry through those three animals. I remarked that I didn't tliink it would, and 1 should remove one of them in the course of the season. However, it was a fine season for the growlli of vegetation, and they lived through th(! sunnner. TUo next spring I conmienced my operations. Jn the first place, 1 removed all obnoxious vegetation ; I made a clean thing of it. U cost me a good deal of labor, but when it was bruslied ovci-, it looked very smooth. I then took twenty bushels of ashes, three-c^uar- ters of a ton of plaster, and ciglit bushels of hen manure, and composted them together. It lay some two or three weeks, and then I scattered it round the fourteen acres, broadcast. It had a very wonderful effect. I have continued this same dressing up to the present time. I commenced this Ofjcration seven years ago, and the season before the last, I j)ut in seven cows and three early sj)ring calves, and had a very line pasture. This last season I put in the same, but in consequence of the severity of the drought, I removed two of the animals. Hut from the experience I have had with this tract of land, I think, if I am permitted to live three years, I can keep ten cows on this pasture, and that they will be able to fdl themselves in two hours, and lie down. There is a great deal of real estate in the town of Deerficld that is useless. We are so situated tliat we arc in want of home pastures, which we do not possess ; but I am satisfied that if the proper measures were taken to reclaim this waste land, we could be well supplied with Ijeautiful pastures, within a stone's cast, almost, of our homes. Dr. IIartvvicll. — Have you made the experiment with plaster alone ? Mr. WiiKJiiT. — I have, sir. The pasture is very hilly, with the exception of two or three acres upon the top, which are flat, and the soil is a sandy gravel. I think that plaster alone would not have much effect upon it. If I come down the lull a little, some ten or fifteen feet, where it is clay, there I get the effect of plaster alone. Mr. Smith, of Northampton. — I have the misfortune to own something like a hundred acres of land occupied for pasturing, which is situated very differently from that in the neighborhood of my friend, Mr. Lathrop, of which he has given 12* 90 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. a description. Plaster alone does not seem to have any effect upon it whatever. It is ground that has been ploughed, hereto- fore, for a long series of years. I should endorse fully the sentiment that has been expressed here, that it is no improve- ment to plough or burn forest lands newly cleared. I have made some little effort to kill out the brush on my old pastures, where there are the high laurel and sweet fern. I consider the laurel one of the hardest bushes in the world to kill. It is hard to plough up, and cutting it off seems only to give new vigor. I have tried burning, but so many leaves fall from it, that they make a light body of matter that burns very readily in a dry season ; and I have only to follow that up about three years, to eradicate all the grass that does grow on the land. I find it eradicates the grass, but does not hurt the bushes, — they grow finely. This land is situated on the sunny side of Mount Tom, prettily located, but rather rough. The soil is a stony loam or loamy gravel. It was naturally a strong soil, but it has been ploughed to death. It produced a heavy growth of oak and hickory, and when it was first cleared off, in my grand- father's day, they used to get good wheat from it — much better than they got on the river flats. Consequently they ploughed, and planted, and cropped, without returning any thing back, until they entirely exhausted it. These lands have not been ploughed much for the last thirty years. We have been expect- ing that by adopting a system of pasturing and keeping the bushes down, they would eventually improve, but the improve- ment is very slight, if any. I have commenced ploughing, to some small extent, to renovate them. I turn over a piece as well as I can, for stony ground, and sow rye, with ashes or guano, or any fertilizer that I can get up there ; I cannot spare manure to use up there. Ashes work well. I have used in connection with ashes, plaster. I cannot see that plaster, applied alone, has any effect ; it may with ashes. In that way I get a pretty good growth of rye. But I do not harvest the rye. I let it stand until it has headed out, and then turn in my cattle and feed it down. In that way I have improved the land, as far as I have tried it. It has given me the most satis- faction of any method I have ever attempted. It makes an abundance of feed, and my seed takes well, sown in that way. It is not very expensive. Fifteen or twenty bushels to the acre SECRETARY'S REPORT. 91 will give a pretty good growth of rye, and will cause grass seed to spring up and live. One piece of four or five acres that I ploughed up a few years ago, has produced more feed than any ten or twenty acres of the same piece. Mr. Anderson. — I still contend that I can kill the high laurel. It is a good deal more difficult to kill than sweet fern, but I have succeeded, on pastures where I have attempted it, in the course of six or seven years. It requires a good deal of time and attention, but if you cut it down smooth to the ground in the first place, and are assiduous in your labors as soon as it comes up, you will be sure to kill it. It can no more live without its leaves, than a man can live without lungs. I would like to inquire about ditching. I have, by expending perhaps twenty-five dollars on four or five acres, in digging ditches and filling them with stone, made land which was formerly useless, the very best land I have. A great deal of our pasture land is too moist. Pasture and mowing land should be dry enough to raise corn. The best corn land is the best land for grass, and I think we should derive as great benefit from ditcliing our pastures as we should from ditching our mowing land. Dr. Hartwell. — Is there any plant that will not die if you cut it below the leaves ? Mr. Anderson. — No, sir. I remember that, formerly, our best mowers were considered those who mowed close to the surface ; and I have known them mow so close on our best lands, where we had been accustomed to have a second crop, that we could not get a second crop ; whereas, on other parts of the field, that were mowed so as to leave something of the herbage, it would start right up and grow. The other would not start that year, and would be injured for years after. Mr. Perkins. — One word in regard to cutting down trees and vegetation. I maintain that if you cut hard wood from this season until the first of May or June, it will not kill it. You may cut any kind of vegetation from the latter part of August to the first of October, and effectually kill it. If I am cutting in the forest, and wish it to sprout up again, I cut only in the spring ; if I don't want it to sprout, I cut from the latter part of August until the first of October. I have cleared thirty-five acres of meadow, that was just one mass of underbrush. I cut 92 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. this brush in the month of August or September, and effectaally finished it ; there was no sprouting ; if I had cut them in any other season, they would have grown again. E. W. Stebbins, of Deerfield. — Is that so with regard to the wahiut ? Can you kill out the walnut sprout by cutting it once or twice, or even twenty times ? Mr. Perkins. — We have no walnut timber in our place, and I cannot say from actual experience ; but I have no doubt that it can be effectually killed. There is a time when the life of the tree is pretty much done for this season, and does not operate until the next ; and if, at that time you cut off all the leaves, it will effectually kill it. Mr. Smith. — In answer to Mr. Stebbins's question, I will say that some few years since I spent a few days in Wisconsin. A friend of mine was clearing a piece of land for wheat that was covered with what they call " scrub timber," consisting of white oak and walnut ; and they were digging it out invariably. They dug down twelve or fifteen inches, and cut off the roots. I asked the reason for that, and they said it was the only way they could clear the ground. They stated that they would grow there for a hundred years if they were not cut down low. I will state that I use ashes, leached or unleached, on my land, and the result is to bring in white clover, I consider that I get great benefit from it. Mr. Wetherell. — I was speaking to Professor Turner, one day, and I told him that I had heard that the hickory could not be transplanted and made to grow. He said, " I can show you one growing." I asked him how he managed to move it, and he said, " My men dug down a depth of twenty-two feet, to the end of the tap-root, and then the tree was removed to my yard, a large hole dug, and the root coiled and placed in that excava- tion." He showed me the tree, and it was growing. That is .an illustration of the depth to which the tap-root of that partic- ular tree penetrates. I would say, also, that a friend of mine told me that he cut over a swamp the last of December or first of January — cut it smooth and close — and he never saw a sprout from a single bush or shrub. He said he had cut it frequently before, at other seasons of the year, and was troubled with sprouts ; but in this instance, he never saw a single sprout. Yet this case SECRETARY'S REPORT.' 93 docs not come within the loeriod that Mr. Perkins names. When I was a young man, engaged in clearing land, I remember very well, that where trees were cut in June or July, they would sprout luxuriantly, because I had the painful labor of going over and beating them off, before burning the brush. Mr. Smith. — One case is brought particularly to my mind. Some few years ago, I purchased a piece of land of six acres, covered with an alder swamp, very thick, and some of them large enough to use for wood. I cleared that piece of ground in the latter part of December, and I never was so little troubled with sprouting as on that piece of land. That was an exceed- ingly cold time ; but whether this result was owing to the action of the frost on the roots, or to the time it was cut, or what, I never was satisfied. I cut them as low as I could. Mr. Stebbins. — There are pasture lands in this vicinity for which neither plaster nor ashes will do anything. What shall we do with them ? Tliey have been plonghed to death. The policy of the old farmers here was, when they cleared a piece of timber land, to burn it over, plough it, and rye it ; and some of our pastures have been ryed and ryed until there is hardly a shadow of soil left. Tlicre is no vegetation on them, and no amount of ashes or plaster that you can put upon them will make vegetation there. There is another difficulty with our pastures — some of our farmers are in the habit of stocking too high. But there is another class who have run into the opposite extreme. I have seen the feed on some of these pastures knee- high all the season through, and in connection with tlie grass there has sprung up, within the last few years, a little knotty bush, almost as small as grass. There was none of that until within the last four or five years. I attribute that wholly to the grass not being fed down. The cattle won't touch that, either early in the spring or late in the fall. Pasture lands want to be fed off close all through the season. Mr. Taft. — The gentleman [Mr. Stebbins] wants to know what he shall do with land that neither plaster nor ashes will help. We have, in the south part of Worcester County, quite a portion of territory that we call the " pine plains." That territory, I am told, was planted with corn by the Indians, and since then it has been ryed to death ; and we have come to the conclusion that the best we can do with it is to let it run up to wood. 94 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. White birch, pitch pine, and white pine grow there. I have in my mind now a piece of land that in 1833 was sold for five dol- lars an acre. Two years ago, I offered a man seventy-five dollars for an acre of it, which was mostly white pine, and he thought it was worth more. Last week, a piece of tliis land was sold for thirty dollars an acre, on which, since I was twenty years old, I have seen rye growing. I suggested that the pur- chaser paid rather a high price for it, but was told that he got it cheap. That is covered with pitch pine and white birch, which are worth six dollars a cord. "We have come to the conclusion that that kind of land isn't worth anything for pasture, espe- cially around certain localities, where our fences " winter-kill " badly. A. F. Adams, of Fitchburg. — I have tried sowing new land for feed, in the spring and in the fall, and I like spring sowing much the best. I plough quite late, after I have done my fall work, and let it lie until about the middle of June. Then I put on a few loads of compost, and sow it with winter rye — about two bushels to the acre — and grass seed. It then comes into feed in August, when our pastures are most apt to fail, and when we need the feed much more than we do in the spring. Mr. Homer, — I would suggest to Mr. Stebbins that he try buckwheat on this land that has been exhausted with rye. Let him raise it for twenty years, and if he don't have as good a crop the twentieth year as he got the first, I shouldn't be willing to give much for his land. There will be a very nutritious crop of redtop following the buckwheat. I have a piece that has averaged me over ten bushels to the acre. I have a pasture containing altogether some fifty acres. There is some of the cowbane on it, and a little high laurel and hardback ; but wherever I have tried plaster, it has killed out those things. I will say, in I'Cgard to plaster, that the white, soft plaster is not worth much for me. Give me the strongest scented plaster. It may be the heaviest, but it will pay the best. Wherever you can produce white clover, if you will put on plenty of plaster, you can have good pastures. Mr. Stebbins. — I would like to inquire if there is any way to kill out moss without ploughing? Dr. Hartwell. — Compost manure or horse manure will kill it. It is an expensive way, but that will do it, and bring in SECRETARY'S REPORT. 95 white clover. It will also kill any other wild plant, if yoii will cut it down. It is as fatal to these wild plants as civilization is to the Indian, — just about as sure to kill. Harrison Garfield, of Lee. — I have on my farm hardhack, and I have found that it gets so strong a hold that no grass will grow at all. It has formed a perfect mat, so that cattle cannot get through, where, ten years ago, there was a good pasture. I have practised mowing it seven or eight years, and cannot kill it in that way. Three years ago I commenced ploughing it up in September and October, pulling it out of the soil and throwing it upon the surface, and when it got dry, gathering it together and burning it ; then I manured the land and cultivated it. It takes two pair of oxen to plough it. Its roots are jagged, and fill the whole surface of the earth. Cutting it down tends to spread the roots and make it grow thicker, so that we have been obliged to tear it out and change the character of the soil, by deep draining, to keep it out, after we had got it eradicated. I am fully persuaded that no cutting down, however close to the ground, will ever kill it. It may, possibly, do it in some places where the soil is lighter than ours. Then, in relation to Canada thistles. They have been there for twelve years, and have been mowed every year, when the stalk was hollow ; they have not been suffered to go to seed. Yet we do kill them by mowing. I have had them on my own lands and driven them off by mowing. But I think much depends on location and the nature of the soil, in regard to killing them off by cutting. Prof. Agassiz. — I would like to inquire what plant it is that is called " hardhack ? " In the eastern part of Massachusetts, it is the spirea tomentosa, — a small shrub, with a rose-colored flower. That certainly cannot be the plant described by the gentleman who has last spoken. Mr. Anderson. — I have no doubt that I can kill the hardhack, or any vegetable that exists. It may be more difficult to kill on some grounds than on others. If the ground is too wet, I would ditch it thoroughly. I think there would be no difficulty in killing it, if kept well cut down. I have killed it, where it has been as thick as it could grow, by one cutting. Mr. Garfield. — Many farmers have been obliged to tear it out of the ground, to get rid of it, satisfied that cutting it off 96 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. would not do it. I was not alone in the experiment. I can cite many instances where it has been tried. We consider it the greatest nuisance we have. We prefer Canada thistles, altogether, to these things. Mr. Perkins. — There are two species of plants in our vicinity that we call " hardhack," but they are dissimilar in their blos- soms. The plant alluded to here is neither of these two kinds, but is a plant that you will see growing in Lee, Lenox, Stock- bridge, Lanesborough, and Pittsficld, on moist land. It grows up in a bush, and has yellow blossoms, with a leaf something like that of the sweet fern, in shape. Mr. Clement. — We had some of the Canada thistles in our pastures, and I felt considerably annoyed, for fear they would increase upon me, and set the men to cutting them off with the hoe, just below the surface, so as to be sure to get all the leaves out of the way. By adopting this method, we, in one season, very nearly eradicated them. J. M. Crafts, of Whately. — I was particularly struck with the remark made by my friend, Mr. Stebbins, in reference to certain pasture lands upon which ashes would do no good. I don't know but it is so ; but I have never yet seen land that * could not be improved by ashes. It is true that some soils may contain potash to such an extent that mineral elements will not benefit them so extensively or so readily as others ; but when a piece of land is denuded of all vegetation, from the very fact that the mineral elements have been exhausted, it shows a strange kind of logic to me, to say that they cannot be imjjroved by the application of those same elements. A question has been raised about eradicating black moss. I live in a neighborhood where there is an abundance of it. The land is cold and wet, and the consequence is that black moss is a great trouble to us. Now, as I have been engaged in the manufacture of pottery ware, I have had occasion to notice the effects of clay upon it. Dr. Hartwell said the way to eradicate black moss was by the use of manures. Now, we cannot afford to do any such thing. Where we grow tobacco for a living, to use manure upon our pastures would be entirely out of the question. Now, in digging the clay from the ground, it gets scattered over a portion of the old pasture that is covered by a complete mass of black moss ; and I have noticed that there the SECRETARY'S REPORT. 97 black moss is killed, and good, sweet, nutritious grasses take its place. If ashes will have no effect on my friend Stebbins's pastures, I recommend him to use clay ; perhaps that may be available. There are some clays that are perfectly dead or inert, and do not have any sensible effect upon the soil ; but others appear to be impregnated with salts, and wherever that clay goes, good results follow. I believe that the application of such clay, fifteen or twenty loads to the acre, for a year or two, com- bined with the application of ashes, would make Mr. Stebbins's worthless pastures very valuable. ^ • Dr. Hartwell. — I said that stable manure would kill this moss, but it was very expensive. I did not recommend it. Dr. W. Spear, of Greenfield. — I would like to ask about exterminating the white daisy, which injures our pastures and mowing land, more than the Canada thistle. Mr. Anderson. — Sheep, I believe, will kill it. Prof. Agassiz. — I know another way. I would not recom- mend it, but it has been very successful in my case. I have just an acre of land round my cottage at Nahant, which was white with this abominable weed. I have with this hand weeded out every root ; there is not one white weed upon the place ; it is a beautiful meadow now. I would say that it did not take so very long, as you might perhaps suppose. In three days I did it ; I worked from early morning until night, for three days ; and they were as thick as I have seen them anywhere. Mr. TiDD. — I have been very much interested in the discus- sion that has taken place this afternoon, in relation to the renovation of our pastures. It is a subject that we ought to consider, and the best way that cftn be devised to do this ought to be resorted to. I coincide with a great deal that was said by the gentleman from Whately. Where pastures can bo renovated without ploughing, we should all agree that that would be the better way ; and where plaster can be applied, and is found effective, it is a very easy way of renovating land. There is a great deal of soil in the vicinity where I live, upon which it has been found very beneficial indeed. It has been used to a great extent on some of the mowing fields, and very beneficially. Some men have almost made their fortunes by it ; that is, by going on to farms that have been run out, as it were, by culti- vation, and applying plaster. I have in my mind several 13* 98 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. instances of that kind. I remember one gentleman in particular, who became possessed of a farm there a number of years ago ; and the question arose in his mind how he should renovate his pastures. He had heard that plaster was one of the means to be used with effect, and he went to Boston, selected his plaster, and brought it home. It was so new an idea that he was ashamed to let his neighbors know what he had in his sleigh, and kept it covered up ; but they found out what he had got, and what he was going to do with it, and they ridiculed him ; but he went on with t\\§ operation, and spread it upon his hill- sides and upon his pastures. Very, early in the season, his neighbors began to inquire " What has produced such an effect upon your pastures ? " " Why, it is that rock that you ridiculed me for bringing up." This was in the town of Barre. This method, of course, spread very rapidly, and the land in that town is of the character that is benefitted very much by the use of plaster, and it has been of great advantage there ; and so it has in the town where I reside. Still, there are some pastures that are not improved by plaster. It has been stated here, that mowing brush below the leaves would be sure to eradicate it after a time. It may be so, but it strikes me that in some cases it would be an expensive way. It is very difficult to cut below the leaves of the low laurel, which grows round stones. It is next to impossible to do it. Here is the low laurel, and the little vines of " five-finger," and other weeds, upon a pasture so thick that there is but very little grass growing upon it. Now, I would ask, How can this pasture be renovated but by the plough ? It seems to me that the only way, or, if not the only way, tlie easiest way, to renovate such a pasture is to pvit these weeds underneath by the plough, and either to cultivate or sow with rye and seed it, and let it be fed in that way. If it can be ploughed so as to turn the brush under and keep them under, perhaps the latter way would answer ; but if it cannot, it strikes me the only way is to culti- vate it until you do kill the brush. I have, for a number of years, practised spreading the manure dropped by cattle, and it is practised to a considerable extent by the farmers in our vicinity. I consider that it pays well for the labor of doing it. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 99 Mr. Bull. — I do not know much about pastures, for there is not a great deal of pasture land in Middlesex County. The people are engaged in the milk business quite extensively, and our farmers are therefore obliged to own pastures up in the country, especially up in New Hampshire. One of my neigh- bors, who had a pasture up there which had formerly been exceedingly valuable to him, but which, as he supposed, had been overstocked for two or three years, found that it began to fail and he did not know what to do with it. He consulted his neighbors, and was advised to stock it with sheep. He thought that would be the ruin of it, for the sheep is a close feeder, and if there was too little pasture before, how was there to be enough pasture for a flock of sheep in addition to his cows ? But con- sidering that sheep eat plants that cows reject, and considering also that perhaps those plants rejected by the cows were pos- sessing the pasture, and so encroaching upon the better grasses which formerly fed the cows, he did put in a small flock of sheep, and to his great astonishment, his pasture improved. He pursued that method for several years, until that pasture was brought back to its pristine fertility, and fed the same number of cattle that he had formerly kept upon it. I throw out this hint for the consideration of the Board ; not that I know anything about it, but because, if there be anything in it, it would be a very easy and profitable method of renovating pastures, inasmuch as you would stock your cattle and some sheep besides. Mr. TiDD. — There are places where it is very difficult to stock with sheep, but where it can be done, I think it is a very effec- tive and very profitable way. I recollect having a pasture once that was infected with hardback, Johnswort, and a variety of noxious herbs of this kind ; I put sheep in there, and it was but a very few years before they were all gone, and the clover was very luxuriant. Mr. Perkins. — I know of no vegetable that will stand before sheep except brakes and Johnswort. In a neighboring town to mine, a man had a very good farm, that he kept stocked with sheep ten or fifteen years. We called his pastures sheeped to death. He sold his sheep, and those pastures were allowed to lie unstocked for two years ; then he stocked with cattle, and his pastures were better than ever before. 100 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. The question comes up here in relation to the kind of grass which it is desirable to cultivate in pastures. Whitetop is not a profitable grass to grow in pastures. It does very well up to the fifteenth day of July, it then goes to seed, and from that time, or from the first of August, when it has dropped its seed, it will not keep any kind of stock any better than rye or oat straw after the seed has been thrashed out. Herdsgrass is not a desirable grass to be put into a permanent pasture ; it runs out there. Redtop is the most desirable of the grasses to cultivate in pastures ; it holds its vitality through the better part of the season, so that the stock keep in good condition until the time of snow-fall. White clover is a very desirable pasture plant, and in a clay soil, it is very likely to predominate. Lime, ashes, and plaster all have a tendency to increase the growth of clover. Now, I wish to advance the idea that white clover is the best quality of feed for anything that gives milk. I believe you can produce a better quality of butter and cheese from white clover than from any other grass. Prof. Agassiz. — I would make a remark which I believe bears upon a point which is not fully taken into consideration. I am struck with the different views presented by Mr. Perkins, on so many points, from those of other gentlemen. I have no doubt it arises from the fact, that his land is over a thousand feet above tide water. A difference of eleven hundred feet, in a country like this, must make a very marked difference in the general character of the vegetation, and I think that difference ought to be kept in view. I know positively, that in Switzer- land, where Alpine pasturage is very extensively carried on, there is a complete difference in the vegetation upon which the cattle are sustained at different heights. In fact, cattle which are raised in the Alps are raised upon plants which they never get as food in the lower part of the same country ; and there is on that account a very marked difference both in the size of the cattle and in their character as producers. I would like, there- fore, to have the lay of the land given, with reference to its height above the level of the sea, when any observations are made concerning its fertility or the character of its vegetation, because, no doubt, there must be a marked difference. Wm. Elliot, of Greenfield. — I would like to inquire if sheep will eat Canada thistles ? I Ijave heard that they would eat them in preference to good hay. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 101 Mr. Perkins. — There arc no Canada thistles in my pastures, and I cannot say how that is ; but I know tliat if sheep arc driven through a lot where there arc Canada thistles, they will nip off the blossoms as they go along. The Chairman. — I thin-k it must be apparent that the methods of improving pasture land differ in different localities, and that what is good for one place is not good for another. Mr. Anderson has presented his method, which seems to have been satisfactory so far as his farm is concerned ; and others have presented theirs. Possibly the best view to take of it would be that every man must be governed by the nature of the land which he owns. I have seen pasture lands upon which there was no grass, ploughed deep, dressed with three or four hundred pounds of bone manure to the acre, and seeded pretty successfully — not very ; it was a long time before the sod was made satisfactory to the cattle. I have seen a piece of high pasture land restored by simply hauling upon it the muck from an adjoining mud-hole. I have seen a piece of clay land, where grass did not grow at all, brought into a most luxuriant growth of herdsgrass and redtop, by simply carting sand upon it, to the depth of two or three inches, and leaving it to the action of the frosts, the rains and the heat. It has occurred to me that, possibly, we had better, in the first place, adopt Mr. Anderson's rule, and not interfere with the grasses already growing in our pastures. You cannot put any one grass, or two grasses, or three grasses, into the best pasture land, that will entirely satisfy the cattle, the sheep and the horses that feed upoh it ; they want a hundred different varieties, some of them more. There- fore I think it would be well to adopt the rule not to interfere with the natural growth of grasses upon the piece of pasture land which you intend to renovate. Having laid down that rule, you will then, of course, remove all noxious weeds and shrubs. That must be done in one way in one place, and in another place in another way. There is no doubt that constant cutting will destroy these things. After having accomplished that, you will then proceed to apply to that land whatever is necessary for its renovation. I have often thought that some sort of an instrument might be invented, which would run under the sod — a sort of plough that would open and lighten the soil without destroying the sod at all. I have often seen a 102 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. piece of pasture roused up in that way by a simple accident ; and an accident will sometimes furnish a rule for you to adopt. But at any rate, after you have made up your mind that the natural grass is all you want to improve upon, and have estab- lished the fact that you can remove all noxious weeds growing there, in one way or another, then the question is, what you will apply. I remember that the Secretary of the State Board of Agriculture once owned, in the town of Rowley, a piece of land upon which I suppose that almost every noxious plant that has been spoken of here grew naturally. The land was low and flat, and you could find as much hardback as you wanted ; you could find Johnswort, if you desired it ; you could find Canada thistles if you were very eager for them, and almost everything. It was low, as I have said, and it was evident there was under- neath a considerable quantity of water. What would you do with such a piece of land as that ? In the first place, let out the water ; and, in the next place, if there is anything that can be applied to it that will bring it into good grass, it is sand. Whether it is a mechanical or chemical process I do not know, but such a piece of land would be exceedingly benefitted by sand. You may find that plaster will do in some cases, but if plaster fails, there is no reason to be discouraged. You can try ashes, to a certain extent, with hen manure or without. Your object should be to ascertain what kind of manure will eSect your purpose, and then apply it. But you have forgotten one of the most important parts of this whole question, and that is, that you cannot stock one pasture with the same kind of animals for a series of years, and not have that pasture suffer. Is not that so ? I have heard that the sheep pastures in Berkshire entirely failed at one time, and the farmers were obliged to sell their sheep because their pastures would not keep them. But the instant the sheep were gone, the cattle came in, and they found feed enough. So the farmers of Berkshire would tell you that sheep will kill a pasture, and cattle improve it. But the simple fact was that the sheep had taken from those pastures, for a series of years, all the grass they were willing to eat, and they had yielded manure enough to draw out other grasses for other animals. I would, then, change the class of animals from time to time. The pastures would last much longer, would be SECRETARY'S REPORT. 103 more nutritious to the animals fc^ upon them, and, in the end, this great difficulty of the failure of pasture lands, would be, to a certain extent, remedied. I do not say that all lands are fit for pastures, because they are not. There is land in the Commonwealth which is not fit for pasture land ; but if you have got a piece of land which is really fit for pasture land, one or the other of the processes which I have suggested will unquestionably keep it in good condition. Mr. Anderson. — I don't know but it may be necessary, in the course of ages, to make this Change ; but pastures that we are now feeding have carried through the same kind of stock for sixty years, and are now worth double what they were. We have one pasture that has been under grass eighty years, and there has been no other kind of stock upon it during that time but neat cattle. It has been over thirty years since I have observed this system, and our pastures have been improving all the while, and our stock improving in proportion. Prof. Agassiz. — I know that in Switzerland, there are pas- tures where cattle have been raised for several years, without any kind of improvement of the natural feed. I do not main- tain that those lands are used to the best advantage, either. I do not know but they might be stocked to a much greater extent than they are. The Chairman. — We have been talking about renovating pasture lands. There would be no occasion for renovating such pasture lands at all, nor those to which Mr. Anderson has referred. The discussion here terminated. Mr. Perkins, in behalf of the committee appointed to consider the question of the establishment of the Agricultural College, stated that the committee had consulted together, in relation to the matter, and would request to be allowed to delay their report until the annual meeting in January. The request was granted. Adjourned to seven and a half o'clock. Evening Session. — Met at seven and a half o'clock. Dr. Loring in the chair. The Chairman stated to the audience tliat Prof. Agassiz, who had been announced as the lecturer of 104 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. the evening, had kindly yielded it to Prof. Rogers, who was obliged to return to the city in the morning. They would not, however, be deprived of the pleasure of hearing Prof. Agassiz, who would speak the next evening, and when they had heard both these gentlemen, he thought they would find it difficult to decide which had gratified them most. ADDRESS OF PROF. WILLIAM B. ROGERS. Thanking you, sir, for the very complimentary manner in which you have introduced me to this audience, and most espe- cially for a form of compliment in which I am associated with one who is distinguished, not only on this continent, but throughout the world and will be forever distinguished in the history of science as its promoter and cultivator in an eminent degree, — thanking you for this compliment, and thanking the Board for the opportunity they have afforded me of addressing them on this occasion, I must at the same time assure you that I come before you entirely free from the presumption that I am able to instruct any member of the Board or any intelligent farmer in the Commonwealth, in the practical business of agri- culture. I have, it is true, in connection with my studies and my explorations in geology and in chemical science, been brought continually in contact with the problems of agriculture, and have learned long since to understand, not only their immense magnitude and importance, but their peculiar com- plexity and difficulty ; and I have, therefore, proposed to myself this evening, in a somewhat rambling way, to present such ideas as have occurred to me in relation, first, to the connection which subsists between agriculture and positive science ; and, secondly, to illustrate my views on this subject by reference to one or two of the larger and more comprehensive relationships which I have been enabled to trace, to some extent, throughout the length and breadth of that portion of the Union which lies between the Atlantic and the Mississippi Valley, in regard to the soils, and the rocks with which those soils are associated. The day has long since passed when the association of agri- culture, in its largest and in its most advantageous practical forms, with the principles of science, even in their more abstract modes of development, was looked upon as a mere dream of the enthusiast ; because the instructed men of all parts of the civ- SECRETARY'S REPORT. 105 ilized world at this day recognize that science, exact science, is but the sure application of common sense to the phenomena by which we are surrounded. You have all, doubtless, heard the story of the dervise in the desert and the lost camel, showing so strikingly the truth of that long celebrated plirase of the illustrious Bacon, in which he speaks of man as the minister and interpreter of nature. The dervise, in his travel across the desert, met with a party of merchants who had lost their camel. He accosted them — " Friends, have you not lost your camel ? " "Yes." " Was it not blind in one eye ? " -'Yes." " Was it not lame in one of the fore legs ? " " Yes." " Had it not lost one of its 'front teeth?" "Yes." "Was it not laden with corn and honey ? " " Yes. Dervise, show us our camel ! " The answer was, " I have not seen your camel. I know not where the animal may have wandered." Indignant and enraged, they dragged the dervise before a justice, and his sim- ple, satisfactory plea was this : " I have not seen the lost camel, but I saw the prints of the animal on the sands. I saw that there was a failure in one of the steps, at each successive impres- sion of his progress. I saw that the grass that had been bitten where the scant herbage grew, always presented a little tuft, uncropped in the centre. I saw by the direction of the bite that the head had been turned obliquely ; and the busy ants on one side and the clustering bees on the other, told me what was the burden of the animal. Thus, then, I recognized the path of the camel and his peculiarities ; and by the simple application of the means of observation with which Providence has endowed me, and the use of my own simple common sense, I interpreted the phenomena and made the discovery." Such is the practical application of the intellect of man in the interpretation of nature, in all the departments in which human discovery has been advanced. There is nothing special, there is nothing peculiar, there is nothing mysterious in science. It is but the multiplied, carefully renewed observation of the facts that abound everywhere and at all times around us, and the application of common sense, tlie ordinary principles of right reasoning, to those facts ; enabling us to evolve the grandest and most magnificent laws, whether those laws be such as con- cern the dust that we tread beneath our feet, or such as link together the starry suns, and the myriads of planets that encircle u* 106 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. them. Then agriculture, as other branches of practical science, requires the determination of our facts of observation in the exactest form, and the proper induction of laws or principles through tlie collation of those facts. But herein lies the great and peculiar difficulty of agriculture as a science. I know that some of my agricultural friends have, in former times, been inclined to smile at me when I have said, asl am still prepared to repeat, that what we want in agriculture, quite as much, if not more, than anything else, are facts, — true facts, — facts in which the most exact and precise determination is made, not only of the result, but of all the conditions by which that result has been brought about. It is very common to distinguish, in ordinary conversation upon subjects of this kind, between the philosophical or theoretical man, and the man of facts ; but the true philosopher in agriculture, as in everything else, is the man who is master of the largest number of the most precise and important observations ; and until he has secured the mas- tery of this great group of facts, he cannot philosophize. Now, the signal difficulty attending investigations in agriculture, — (pardon me for my seeming presumption, in speaking upon a subject, with which you, sir, and the larger part of my audience, are so much more familiar in detail than I,) — consists in the great diversity, and, in many respects, peculiar obscurity of the facts. Let us take an illustration now, in reference simply to the phenomena of soil. We all know well tliat thei^e was a time when not only in many parts of Europe, but largely throughout the United States, the most sanguine, and, I may now say, the most extravagant anticipations were formed from the applica- tion of the doctrines of Liebig and other chemists to the affairs of agriculture. Far be it from me in any degree to disparage the labors of this illustrious chemist and his fellow-workers in the field ; but the question has not unfrequently been presented to me whether, by a knowledge of the composition of the soil, and a knowledge of the composition of the plants that are grown upon the soil, we cannot surely reach a successful agricul- tural method. My answer would be, no. The composition of the plants and the composition of the soil are only two of the correlative facts. We must know them, but there are many other things that we must know, which are equally essential to be known. The soil may bo of a certain composition, and yet SECRETARY'S REPORT. 107 the ingredients of that soil may be in such a state of mechanical aggregation as to be scarcely at all available to the absorptive apparatus of the plant. The conditions of atmosphere, of moisture, and of temperature, affected always by the character of the soil as to its mechanical composition, will have a most marked and sometimes entirely controlling influence in regard to the production of vegetable growth. So important is this, that, some twenty years ago, I undertook, in association with my youngest brother, a vefy prolonged series of investigations, having an agricultural object in view, with the purpose of ascertaining somewhat numerically and with necessary exact- ness, the degree to which the solubility, and therefore the avail- ableness, of certain mineral materials was affected by the reduction of those substances to a state of extremely fine comminution, and here are some of the results. A mass of granite, which yields to rain water or to distilled water an entirely imperceptible trace of any of its ingredients by contact, will, when it has been reduced by a properly continued process of reduction, to an impalpable powder, — even finer in these experiments than wheaten flour, — at once begin to suffer decomposition by the contact of pure water ; so much so, that a little of this powder placed in a paper funnel, and then exposed to the dripping, for a short time, of perfectly pure water passing through it, will yield up a sufficient amount of its potash, its soda, and of its lime, to make it perfectly easy to demonstrate tlieir presence in the liquid when received in a vessel beneath, by the appropriate tests. And so a mass of felspar, a mass of hornblende, a mass of soapstone, or a mass of the hardest sienite, when thus reduced to a very fine condition of comminution will be found instantly to show the decomposing action of the infiltrating water ; and when that water is charged with carbonic acid, which it must be when it descends in rain drops through tlie atmosphere, drinking up this gas as it passes down, and still more as it sinks through the earth, it has a double, even a tenfold power of solution in regard to these various materials. Now see the difference in another case. We take an ordinary mass of bone-earth, which has been broken into the form of bone meal, by the common process of Bogardus's mill ; we know that to a certain extent, it is soluble by the infiltrating water that passes through it. But let this 108 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. material be reduced, as it can be, in a new form of mill machinery which is at work in the vicinity of Boston, to an impalpable dust, and it becomes quite soluble, so that the water passing through it drinks it up in large quantities, and would furnish it most liberally to the roots of living plants. These, then, are simple illustrations of the enormous influence exercised by mere mechanical aggregation on the value of soils. Of course, this is no novelty to those who hear me ; but it seems to me that the importance of the fact has not been duly weighed or sufficiently recognized in practical agriculture. I might in like manner illustrate the influence of the color of soils as aflecting their capacity for absorbing the solar rays, and in the same connection speak of the relative powers of difierent soils as to the conduc- tion and retention of heat, and I might dwell on the still more important diversities which depend on the permeability of soils to moisture, and their power of retaining it when received ; but I must pass over these leading considerations to ar fact of special interest less generally known, which was first clearly established a few years since by the great agricultural chemist Boussingualt. This able observer ascertained that in soils con- taining much organic matter intimately blended in the mass, there exists and is continually evolved a marked amount of carbonic acid in the gaseous state. He found that the air occupying the interstices of the soil, forming often one-half of the entire volume, was not the common atmospheric air of the surface, but that it was air impregnated with carbonic acid, amounting in the case of certain deep organic loams to a considerable percentage of the whole bulk. Now, carbonic acid, you know, is one of the materials which contribute directly to the nourishment of plants, the substance which chiefly furnishes the carbon, building up, as it were, the solid framework of the vegetable structure, while the oxygen previously combined with the carbon in the gas, is, in the pro- cesses of the vital economy, exhaled again into the atmosphere. Now, observe what an important element here is, which yet is not detected by the ordinary analysis of the soil. The soil is dried, the water is expelled, the gases it held are freed and escape, and the soil is then analyzed as a dry, solid material, leaving us in ignorance of one of its most important characters — the capacity it possesses through the chemical change of its SECRETARY'S REPORT. 109 organic contents of furnishing a continual supply'of this most vahiable form of the food of plants. Observe further, that not only does the carbonic acid, thus distributed throughout such rich vegetable loams, convey directly its important nutritious matter to the growing plant, but it is the most powerful solvent which nature furnishesus, under these conditions, for the calcareous compounds, and for the various alkaline compounds contained in the granules of sub- divided rocks ; so that the water passed through such soil becomes freighted with carbonic acid, and thus has a powerful dissolving action which it did not possess when it descended in the form of rain to strike upon the surface of the ground. All these various conditions, then, require to be taken into account, and they must be in each particular case precisely determined, otherwise we have not the facts. But when we do obtain all the facts, then we are in a condition well prepared to reason upon them, and to deduce our general laws and our practical rules, suggested by those generalizations. But, further than this : this knowledge of the soil, this terra Jirma of the science and practice of agriculture does not consti- tute its whole. We have to deal in agriculture, as we all know, with living beings. We have all the physiological la'ws relating to their development and growth, their nutrition and various functions, to consider. We have in agriculture much of the mystery, much of the difficulty and complication in our problems which belong to the practice of the physician. We have added to the requisitions of the most profound chemical analysis and the largest generalizations in chemical science, a demand for the facts and laws that belong to physiology, embracing all that is known of the functions of living beings, in their relations to external agencies of a chemical and mechanical nature. What wonder, then, is it, that agriculture (pardon me for saying it,) is a science still in its infancy, when we know well that medi- cine, as a science, is recognized by its greatest and most illus- trious lights, as at best, only in its nonage; and when we conceive of the vast difficulties and the complexities of the problems that belong to it ! Yet, we have this to console us — that while we may not be able, for want of a thorough knowl- edge of all the facts, and perhaps of a complete and perfect knowl- edge of very many of them, to draw the broadest generalizations, 110 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. such has been the miiUiplication of exact inquiries in connec- tion with agricultural phenomena and the relations of chemistry and physiology to this subject of late years, that we are in a condition to deduce many partial laws, and thus to avail our- selves largely in practice of the lights which science, in its various forms of inquiry, has been able to shed upon the sub- ject. Does the view that has been presented discourage us from the cultivation of science in its relations to agriculture ? Surely not. It only shows us the more how necessary science is. And let me here say, that one of the greatest advantages that can be obtained from Schools of Agriculture, in their most enlarged and comprehensive shape, — one of the greatest, if not the most important result for the future progress of the science and the art, is this : that the training which is enforced by the study of the exact sciences, in the class-room, in the laboratory, and among the various phenomena and objects which the naturalist exhibits to the student, is the only sure process by which he can be qualified for the exact determination of the facts of agriculture, and for deducing from them scientific laws, and rules for practice. See how it has been with meteorology ! Our fathers, for how many generations it is not necessary to say, had been piling up their observations, so that a library might be filled, merely by the numbers they had jotted down as records of temperature and other phenomena of the weather. Yet nearly the whole of tliat vast mass of what used to be called facts has been found to be almost valueless for purposes of generalization, simply because the observations were not made in the right way or of the right kind ; they were not comparable one with another ; the instru- ments themselves were not reliable, and there was no standard with 'which they were compared. Thus, in spite of the labor of so many thousand observers, in recording the coldness of win-, ters and the warmth of summers, and the varying pressure of the air, no sufficient data were collected for determining truly the distribution of temperature, pressure and other elements of climate, and it is only of late years that, through the adoption of precise methods of observation introduced by science, a sure progress has been made in unfolding the laws of these varying influences and phenomena. Habits of exact observation, accord- ing to scientific methods, aiming to approach the nicety and precision of mathematical determination, — these are the results SECRETARY'S REPORT. Ill of the kind of schooling wliich a student in an agricultural college ought to have, and with which, doubtless, he will be furnished, when such an institution shall be duly organized, within the boundaries of this Commonwealth. I propose, gentlemen, to say a few words in regard to certain general aspects of the soil, as related to the rocks of the United States, — a very broad subject it must be confessed. But before entering on this topic definitely, it may interest my audience a little if I show them two objects which I have before me, as illustrating how the culture of the soil connects itself directly with chemical inquiries, and of what an interesting character they are. Everybody knows, of course, what clay is. It is not a simple substance. It iisually consists of a portion of silica, in other words, pure flint, in a state of fine subdivision, and alumina, or pure clay. Now this pure clay consists in a very large proportion of a peculiar metal called aluminium, so that in this sense, we all have metallic mines under our feet, and with every ploughshare, we are turning up large quantities of this metallic matter. Here is the metal. [Exhibiting a small piece of aluminium.] This is the metal which is the basis of clay. A pure metal, beautifully resonant, [striking it upon the desk,] hard, silver-like in its lustre, and extremely light, — a little more than two and a half times the weight of the same bulk of water. Many of you have, doubtless, seen it, as it is beginning to be used to a considerable extent, in the manufac- ture of ornaments. It exists as a very large ingredient of the crust of the earth. The quantity of iron deposited throughout the various strata of the globe is to be looked upon as utterly insignificant in comparison with the quantity of this metal ; but it is only of late years that it has been obtained from the rock or earth in which it exists as a white oxide clay, just as iron is found as a red oxide, in the common ores of that metal. Such, then, is a part of the chemistry of your soil. Here is another metal, still more curious. It is a very light wire. Every one knows the substance called magnesia. Most persons who have the care of a nursery, understand some of its uses. Now magnesia is nothing more than the white rust of this metal ; and magnesia is one of the most abundant sub- stances in the rocky structure of the earth. Many parts of the Vermont range of hills consist largely of magnesian slates, and 112 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. it is, moreover, a large ingredient of many limestone formations, occupying extensive tracts in this and other countries. This light metal, as you see, is capable of being made into wir6. Now, it has a very curious property, which I shall try to show you. [The professor here put the wire into the flame of a com- mon lamp, and it burnt with great brilliancy.] You perceive it burns with a very vivid combustion. The intense brilliancy of the flame is due to the suspended particles of the volatilized metal and its oxide produced by the combustion. This white product which you see, is common calcined magnesia. The process was simply this : the rusting, which is naturally very slow, was here carried on with great rapidity, so as to combine the oxygen in the atmosphere with this metal, and thus to reproduce the magnesia from which the metal has been actually manufactured. This, then, is another illustration of what we have chemically in the soil. I have introduced these two experiments, perhaps a little out of place, but they serve to show how impossible it is to investi- gate one department of physical science, independently of the rest — how entirely reciprocal and intermingled in their laws ase all the provinces of nature and all the parts of each. Not a star in the visible heavens but sends its light to every other star, and is in return the recipient of radiance from all the rest. In the. course of my various explorations of the geology of portions of the United States, especially of the Middle and some of the Southern States, I had particular occasion to observe the relations of the soil to the subjacent rocks. I know that in speaking to the farmers of this region of Massachusetts about the relations of the soil in other parts of the country, they will not consider that I am broaching a subject unfitting the occa- sion, for we are students of the whole subject, in its largest comprehensiveness and extent. Now, it will be observed at once that there is a character which marks the surface material of the New England States, and of the Northern and North-Western States generally, which is quite peculiar to them as compared with the States lying further to the south. It is this : that over a very large part of this northern area, the soil is not at all determined by the subja- cent rock, because the surface is covered up, sometimes to a SECRETARY'S REPORT. 113 very great depth, with the debris of the rocky materials trans- ported from a distant region, and the material which constitutes the soil is such, as, for the most part, does not exist in its original form in the rocky structure which lies beneath. There- fore the study of the rocks of a large part of such a territory is a matter of comparatively little importance ; but the study of the composition of this drift material, — this gravel, sand and clay, — which constitutes the really available portion of the surface in many districts of the north, is of course essential to the purposes of agriculture, as it is essential to the generaliza- tions of the scientific geologist. But when we proceed to certain sections of the south, we pass beyond the limits of this great northern drift, which, either through the action of glaciers, or of vast moving masses of water, has been swept over so great a portion of the northern hemisphere. When we pass south a certain distance — for example, a little south of the northern limit of Pennsylvania, — we find that this drift covering has become very thin, and soon we find that it has entirely disap- peared. From this, onward, the soil in general, through a vast district of country, has been formed by the disintegration of the subjacent rocks and has its mineral characters determined by the nature of these rocks. Of course, in this remark I do not include the alluvial soil of the valleys, some of which has been transported from northern regions, — for instance, along the northern course of the Susquehannah, — but the main soil of the uplands, and much of that which has been deposited as alluvion is derived from the rocky materials that occupy the /Very surface of the contiguous land. Let us now consider some of those great belts of soil thus deriving their materials and qualities from the contiguous geo- logical formations. Commencing our observations, we will suppose; with Long Island and New Jersey, we extend our view along that broad Atlantic plain, having the ocean on its eastern margin, washing it continually with its wearing ripples, and reaching towards the west and north-west as far as the falls of the rivers, where stand Trenton, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Wash- ington, Richmond and Petersburg, curiously enough, all located just at the margin where this great Atlantic plain ceases, and where the broad belt of granite and other so-called primary rocks begins to make its appearance. Now, throughout all 16* 114 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. this lower and comparatively level country, we have various sandy and loamy soils, composed chiefly of the marine deposits of wliich the entire region is made up. Beneath the surface in a large portion of the vast area to which I am referring are to be found those rich resources which under improved forms of human activity and organized industry are destined ere long to transform the wasted fields into a garden of beautiful produc- tiveness. The treasures are the beds of shell marl accumulated in the ancient sea and stored up beneath the soil to serve as a perpetual source of renovation and fertility. The tertiary deposits of shells, sometimes of very great thick- ness, showing themselves along the margins of rivers, and in the ravines where they are deep enough, and found in all directions in the interior, furnish to the land large quantities of carbonate of lime ; and associated with this the remains of organic matter, vegetable and animal, deposited at the same time,' materials wliich when dug up and spread over the sands and clays, which are seemingly sterile on the surface, enrich them in many cases to a degree of exuberant fertility. Let me now give a little illustration of what may here be seen in reference to the chemistry of the soil. There is one district of the tertiary region, north-east of Fredericksburg, celebrated now in the history of this war, a part of the peninsula called the Northern Neck, between the Potomac and the Rappahannock, — where there are extensive localities destitute of shell marl, altliough it once existed in them in enormous quantity. There, the farmer digging with a view of finding this precious material for manuring his fields, comes upon a mass of clay and sand, sour to the taste and having the smell of sulphur, and which, when applied to the soil under ordinary circumstances, produces a poisonous instead of a beneficial effect. Look at this clay or sand, and you will see that it contains no shells. They could not exist in it, but would be dissolved out and removed by the acid which impregnates the mass. But instead of the shells you will see cavities dispersed in every direction through the clay and sand, which a little observation will show to be what we migbt call the spectres of departed shells. In other words, they are the hollow moulds left by the shells which once abounded in the mass. But what has become of the shells ? Dig down twenty, thirty feet deeper, and you reach a stratum of clay ; SECRETARY'S REPORT. 115 and this clay is studded all over, penetrated tlirongh in all ' directions with beautiful crystals of gypsum, in the form that mineralogists call selenite. The history of the wliole change is at once revealed. The acid that still lingers in the upper clays, is sulphuric acid in a very diluted form. The whole mass of this clay has been slowly infiltrated from above by this diluted acid, which has dissolved out all the shelly matter, forming plaster of Paris from the carbonate of lime, which being arrested by the impenetrable bed of clay below, has formed the crystals of gypsum there. The farmer who has learned this history knows where to find the gypsum deposit. When he discovers the beds of clay from which the shells have been dissolved, he feels pretty sure that some twenty or thirty feet lower down he will find what is perhaps more valuable for his grass land than the original marl would have been, for he knows that in this region nature has manufactured the gypsum through the destruction of the shells. We pass next to the belt lying west of this, in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, the Carolinas, and Georgia, and we come upon the granites and gneissoid and slaty rocks, quite analogous to those which we have here in the central and north-western sections of New England. But in the region referred to, these rocks have been decomposed to an extraordinary extent. The soil there is nothing more, as it were, than effete rock, — the residuum left by the decomposition of the strata beneath. Tliere has been no soil transported from other districts and spread over the surface. Therefore the study of the character of the rock gives, in a large degree, a clue to the character of the soil. So deep has been this process of decomposition, through the slow agency of rain descending upon the surface and the oxygen of the atmosphere attacking the various metallic compounds, that in many places where the apprehension was felt that enormous rock cuttings would become necessary in the construction of railroads, it has proved that the pick and spade were all that was required ; and yet, so free from violence has been the change that the very structure 'of the mica-slates and the talc-slates is perfectly preserved. You may walk through a deep cut in one of those railroads, where the wall may be as much as sixty or seventy feet high on either side, and you will think you see solid rock, consisting of colored bands of mica- 116 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. slate and talc-slate, with occasionally interspersed veins of quartz, the whole succession of beds steeply inclined, and thereby admitting more freely the decomposing agencies from the surface. Compact as the mass seems, it crumbles at a touch. These rocks are thus forming soil continually. The decomposed mass still contains some lime, some potash, and other valuable materials appropriate to soils, and is ready to deliver them up for the use of growing vegetables, whenever opportunity may be presented. We may regard the mass of softened rock, as hav- ing, to a great extent, been leached out, by the action of rain-water, and thus largely deprived of its lime and other soluble ingredients. Now, it is an important remark, in con- nection with this change, that the lime and the soda and the potash belonging to these rocky matters in their original solid aggregation, may be looked upon as cementing materials, and that the moment you separate these from the rocky substance, you break up the cohesion of its parts, and, as in the case of granite, it tumbles down in earthy particles, forming a white clay, mixed with the quartz and mica which remain, comparatively unchanged by the action of these agents. Advancing a stage further towards the west, we come upon a continuation of our Vermont range, the Green Mountains, which, with very little interruption, run down as far as the mid- dle of Western Georgia. This mountain belt may be traced, indeed, in geological continuity, from the banks of the St. Law- rence, through that portion of Canada which is contiguous, along through Vermont, through New York, — constituting the Higblands, — through New Jersey, — having the same name, — through Pennsylvania, under the name of the South Mountains, until it comes to the grandly classic region of Harper's Ferry, where it takes the name of the Blue Ridge, and continued in south-westerly course forms the great backbone of the central portion of Virginia ; whence it passes out to form the Iron and Smoky Mountains of North Carolina, whose grand summits tower even many hundred feet above Mount Washington itself; thence, prolonged still further; it declines, and is lost about the centre of the line of division between Georgia and Alabama. Here is a great range of rocky materials, in many respects analogous throughout its whole course, and associated with soils derived from the decomposition and having analogous characters. On SECRETARY'S REPORT. 117 the west of this great mountain range, in Vermont and in New Jersey, and again in Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, East Tennesee, and Alabama, we have one grand continuous belt of formations, perhaps one of the most superb agricultural and mineral regions of the habitable globe ; a belt overlooked on either side by mountains, prolonghig itself through a distance of more than a thousand miles, and covered from end to end with limestone rock, and furnishing all the resources of a limestone region in its springs, its metallic ores, its grass-producing soils, and the rounded outlines of its topography. And then, when we pass still further west and north, we encounter ranges of slate and sandstone and calcareous rocks, in a parallel succes- sion of lofty hills and deep valleys, abounding in useful ores, and furnishing a diversity of soils, corresponding to the strata from which they are replenished. Beyond this rugged belt of the Appalachians we reach the margin of the far-extending coal measures, made up of sandy, slaty, marly, and calcareous strata, interleaved throughout with vast sheets of coal and covered with a soil springing directly from these materials. Such, on a great scale, are the facts which illustrate the inti- mate association, throughout wide regions, of the soils, with the rocks or other deposits which lie beneath or around them ;. and they clearly show, that in all future migrations in that direc- tion, for the extension of American enterprise and the develop- ment of American industry, under more happy auspices, a knowledge of the geology of the country will furnish the best clue to the fundamental facts connected with its agriculture. THIKD DAY. Morning Session. — Met at ten o'clock. Paoli Lathrop, of South Hadley, was elected President, pro tern. The first subject assigned for discussion was CATTLE HUSBANDRY. The Chairman. — I will say that I do not think there is any particular breed of cattle that is best for all places and climates. A man who is selecting cattle should select the best animals for breeding that he can find, without much regard to cost, with reference to his situation, — according to his soils and his means of feed. I would not advise any man who is going to breed 118 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. cattle to go into the expense of buying high-bred cattle unless he expects to take care of them. No man can afford to keep his cattle, hogs, and sheep, unless he keeps them constantly growing. There are many of our farmers who commence the winter with a herd of cattle, feed out the whole of their hay and grain, and in the spring, their cattle are worth no more than they were in the fall. Now, if they would add to their feed and keep them growing, they would gain something ; if they will not do this, they will get nothing for their feed but the manure ; and from poor cattle, the manure is as much poorer as the cattle are poorer. Dr. LoRiNG. — The subject as presented to the meeting is somewhat novel in its phraseology, and it was so presented by the committee for the express purpose of allowing a large lati- tude of debate. You will observe that nothing is said about breeds, but the topic is intended to include all those classes of cattle that have, to a certain extent, become acclimated, and have become almost a distinct breed by themselves ia certain localities in New England. I suppose that one important point in the discussion would be the most valuable class of animals for New England farming purposes. It was very properly remarked at the opening of the meeting, that there is no one distinct and definite breed of ani- mals universally adapted to New England agriculture. We have great diversity of soil and climate here. We have pastures of every description ; high, hilly pastures, covered with short, sweet feed, and the luxuriant pastures of our river valleys. We find these various kinds of soil and these pastures in almost every State. The State of Maine, including a very large terri- tory, has almost as great a variety of feed in it as all the rest of New England. There is as much difference between the feed along the valley of the Aroostook and the Kennebeck as there is between the valley of the Kennebeck and tlie Connecticut. There is as much difference between the pastures of the north- ern part of that State, and the pastures about Portland and the southern part of the State as there is between the pastures of Essex and Franklin Counties. So of New Hampshire ; so of Vermont ; so of Massachusetts ; and so of Connecticut and Rhode Island. It must be evident, then, that the same rule holds good with regard to cattle here that does in many parts of SECRETARY'S REPORT. 119 • Europe. The traveller through Switzerland is sometimes aston- ished to find that the mere boundary between two cantons will make as much distinction in the cattle to be found in those two cantons as if that dividing line were a thousand miles wide. It is owing partly to the fact, that for a long series of years the cattle planted upon these various sections of Switzerland have estab- lished for themselves a distinct identity, and adapted themselves to the special agricultural peculiarities of the cantons in which they are produced. Now, the same^law, of course, applies to New England ; and when I hear any gentleman advocating any distinct breed as adapted to all New England, I have only to point him to that country, where they have been planted, and where they have established distinct families, adapted to the peculiarities of soil and climate in which they live. I suppose that in New England, especially, the dairy is about the most important point to which the breeding of cattle can be devoted. I tliink a dairy cow, a cow adapted chiefly to the purpose of producing the most butter and cheese, or milk, if you are near a milk market, from the least amount of food, is, in the long run, the best cow for a New England farmer to own. I have no doubt that there are certain sections of the States, perhaps, of Massachusetts, in which large, heavy cattle can be raised to profit. There are unquestionably certain sections where butter and cheese especially are manufactured, where it is an object to the farmer to reduce his feed, with due regard to thrift, to that point which will most economically carry a cow through the vacation of winter, — that is, from the end of tlie dairy in autumn to the beginning of the dairy in spring, — and in those sections, larger-sized cattle are advantageous. There are, therefore, certain sections in which the heavier animals can be reared with profit; — large milkers, beginning in the middle of May, and going on until the last of feed in autumn, producing a great quantity of milk, whicli are profitable cows to the farmer, and which can be wintered economically upon the rough fodder which grows so abundantly in many parts of this State. That is one branch of farming that is unquestionably attended with profit. It enables the farmer to furnish himself witli manure in winter, and at the same time it furnishes him with an oppor- tunity, in case of accident to such a dairy cow as that, to convert her into an abundance of beef during the next season following. 120 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. I make these remarks because I know that a great many farmers in the Commonwealth pursue that branch of business, with that class of cattle, to advantage. How many herds of cattle we know of in this valley of the description I have spoken of, one side of which commenced with the best blood to be found either in this country or in Europe, properly crossed upon the best animals here, until at last they have established themselves, and have brought themselves up to a type of animal which is entirely worthy of the best breeder of the best animals in England or anywhere else. They find no place in the Herd Book ; they have not sprung from any royal family ; I grant that on their mother's side they have nothing to boast of, except that their ancestors were pretty good cattle ; but on their father's side they get to the fountain-head, and by years of breeding in that way, they have really established for them- selves a type adapted to this soil and climate, and a type which I am almost inclined to say, and I don't know but I might say with truth, better adapted to the soil and climate in which they have grown up, than any imported animals we can conceive of, considering the fact that our soil and climate differ so materially from those of any other country where herds of animals of that description are raised. They are acclimated, they are almost indigenous, they are natives, they know exactly what they are to meet with in winter, they understand our pastures in summer ; and they have that kind of bone and muscle and digestive organs, and that organization of heart and lungs, which make them peculiarly adapted to the farming of this section of New England. Now, there are a great many farmers, I think, who find it for their advantage, under the circumstances I have described, to select animals like those of which I have spoken. Gentlemen who propose to keep such animals must have just as good pas- tures and winter feed as some of those persons who spoke yesterday of the condition to which they have brought their pastures by careful renewal have got. Such animals will not browse on barren hills ; they cannot live on sandy plains ; they cannot live in mud holes. These animals must of necessity go to the good farmer who takes care of his pastures, and especial care of his mowing land. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 121 Then we have another class, and that is the smaller animal of which I spoke in the beginning. Not exactly the kind of animal we now have. This question is of different " kinds " of animals. Now, sir, we have one kind of animal in New Eng- land, the special utility of which I have never been able exactly to ascertain. I think they may be pronounced the poorest " kind " that was ever heard of. We are told that they sprung from ccrtai* animals brought here by the Puritans. If the Puritans did bring them here, they were the poorest thing they brought. They have no sort of shape that is satisfactory to a judge of cattle ; their whole external outline is in violation of every rule of breeding ; their whole physiological condition in violation of every law laid down by those who have studied the animal physiology, with reference to breeding. Their prominent point, apparently, is their horns. No intelligence in their eyes, nothing fine about their muzzles, no indication that they have any qualities except those dull, heavy, stupid, inanimate qualities which enable them to go through the dullest toil on the poorest conceivable farm known on earth. Their heads and horns will almost outweigh all the rest of their carcases. You find them with bad crops, broken off behind the shoulders, raw-boned and rough ; their skins as hard as a stove-pipe, nothing mellow about them ; their hair as hard and inexpressive as the stubble of the grass that was mown in the middle of the drought of last summer. Now and then you find some person who owns one of these animals, who will say to you, " I have got a cow that will give twenty quarts of milk, and she is a native, too." He never tells how much it costs to get the milk, or how much food it takes to keep her in that condition. She presents herself with a tremendous capacity to carry food, and she ought to do something in return for it ; but she is an exception. If you will examine the picture of the Oakes cow, which, fifty years ago,, was a famous cow in New England, you will find that although she was a profitable cow for the dairy, she had no point to recommend her. She was a mere accident, and never transmitted any of her qualities. You will find there is not a single representative of that cow now that is of any sort of value to any farmer of New England. Now, that is not an extravagant description. Those gentle- men who were with me on the pleuro-pneumonia commission, 16* 122 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. know perfectly well the kind of cattle they too often met with. There were some herds of good cattle, but I would like to ask you, sir, [Mr. Lathrop,] how many scores of yearling and two- year old steers and stags that would have had but little to recommend them, were found in the region visited by that dreadful disease. It seemed to me that they would hardly pay for wintering. They undoubtedly converted a large quantity of coarse food into manure ; but I doubt if they themselves were worth much more in the spring than they were in the autumn. Any of you may find the same thing in other parts of the "State, and too often in the hands of farmers, who, in other respects manage their farms well. I do not think these animals are creditable to the agriculture of Massachusetts. There is no reason why, from the eastern boundary of Maine to the southern boundary of Connecticut and Rhode Island, there should be found animals of that description, for we have scattered all over New England male animals of the "best description, offered to farmers at the most reasonable prices ; and if gentlemen examine those places where the best animals have been produced, they would find that it has been done by the infusion of good blood, brought there by some enterprising and careful man. Go up to Berkshire — not a very promising part of Massachusetts — not a place in which you can plant corn and sit at your doors and see it grow ; not that part of Massachusetts where the frosts cease so early in the spring and keep off so late in autumn, that the farmer has a long and luxuriant season before him ; where there are good pastures, it is true, but not what would be called an easy, fine, or luxuriant farming country, — go up there, and what do you see ? Why, in one of those towns, by the introduction of a good Shorthorn bull, has been established a race of animals which has brought wealth into the town, and has made the farmers prosperous. Go, not four miles from here, and what do you see ? By the careful introduction of that kind of blood which has been so prudently bred and husbanded in this valley, a herd of cattle has been secured, which, although not in the Herd Book, will vie with any herd in or out of it that can be found in the world. In New Hampshire, in. Connecticut, and in Eastern Massachu- setts you find the same thing. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 123 Now, that is the kind of animal that is worth having in New England ; I will not say the breed, for I will not undertake to define which hreed is best adapted to any given locality ; let every farmer judge for himself. There are men here who know perfectly well that the introduction of a Shorthorn bull into their region is a perfect blessing to them. I see plenty of men who know that the introduction of an Ayreshire bull into their region is a little more than a blessing to them. Let every farmer judge according to his necessities, and you will then have, not the poor kind of animals I have described, but good kinds, each of a good quality, and each adapted to the locality in which it is produced. If there is any section of the State in which large, heavy cattle can be produced to profit, let them be produced there ; and those of us who live in a section where the pastures are shorter, where it is important that the milking powers of our animals should be kept up almost the season round ; where we are obliged to feed good hay to our cattle and some grain ; where the temptation of a milk market is not to be resisted, even if a little money is lost in the winter, — ^in these sections, we must have an entirely different kind of animal. Let this be the rule, — a sort of universal rule, — we will have a good kind of animal, at any rate ; a kind and description adapted to the climate, soil and location in which we live. Now, then, what is this kind ? There are certain rules which you cannot violate. You may breed for one thing or another, but there is a certain shape of animal which belongs to a proper and good kind, which you cannot violate in any way. You cannot make a good cow out of a poor one ; at the same time there are certain rules by which you can judge of the different kinds of animal the farmer may adopt. For instance, you begin at the head. Every man knows that there is no animal 0/1 the face of the earth that has not just as much expression in its countenance as any man, according to the class to which it belongs ; and that is almost the first pre-requisite. I do not mean to say that I would have animals with a fine-drawn, small- sized, or admirably-chiselled head, but I would have heads that present indications of strength ; width of forehead ; not a great preponderance of horns, but the horns nicely set on ; great length from the root of the horns down to the eyes ; width between the *eyes ; the face below the eyes not brought down 124 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. and tapering to a point, but gradually approaching a good, luxurious, ample muzzle, expressive of a vigorous appetite and good nutritive functions ; and, at the same time, that degree of brightness and patience and amiability about the eyes that is so agreeable in all living beings, — the horse and the cow, man and woman. I would have a clean, thin, finely-shaped neck, not too long nor too short, with a certain depth down through to the brisket, which indicates strength of circulation. If I am told that the male of such a cow would have an effeminate, cow-like neck, I pause there. I want a masculine, not an effeminate- looking bull. I want a firm, strong, well-rising crest to the neck, indicating that he has got the will as well as the power to protect the females of the herd. As to the shoulders, you want the animal snug, compact in the shoulder, for beef. If for the dairy, you cannot be too particular about the compactness with which the shoulder-blade is set on the top, and the uniformity with which it comes up there ; neither can you be too careful to have the bone of the lower part of the shoulder prominent and well-developed ; not round and tight and snug, but long from the elbow to the point of the shoulder, and, as the animal moves, free and easy in its motion. Then, when you come back to the ribs, you want a rib springing with grace from the spine ; not a flat-sided animal, nor one with a round, thick-feeling rib. You may be sure there never was a good dairy cow that had what is usually called a round rib. I speak of the rib alone and not of the shape given to the carcase by the ribs. If such a cow gives you twenty quarts one day, in three weeks she won't give you six. On the top of the spine, the processes should be loose and open. As you come to the hind-quarters, let the line from the hip back to the tail be as straight as a water-level can make it. Then you want a well made, solid hind-quarter, not too thin nor too thick, but well muscled ; and a hind leg strong, firm, that looks as if it would stand the wear and tear of fifteen years of hard labor. And the legs should be well-defined, finely drawn, and looking as if there were strength and nerve in them ; not legs particularly round, but in which all the cords and muscles stand out with vigor, as if they had good blood behind them to keep them in good order. The skin should be soft, the liair lively. The matter of color is not of great impor- tance. If you will adopt this rule, I think you wHl find that SECRETARY'S REPORT. 125 no animal made up in that way will fail to feed well. And this is the reason why Jerseys, which as a "breed are not well made, are unprofitable feeders, as compared with other breeds known to have better forms, and consequently better constitutions. If you govern yourselves by the character of your pastures, you need not be afraid that such an animal as I have described will fall to pieces in the summer. If the size is what is adapted to your land, they will know how to take care of themselves. So, then, as a general rule for New England, let us adopt some such system as I have advised, and let each man, or let the men of each locality, govern themselves by the necessities of the case. I am confident that more attention to the structure and quality of the animal, and less devotion to large, imposing size, would be advantageous to most of the farmers of New England. Medium sized, well-shaped animals seem best adapted to our farming. Adopting that rule, and being guided by the light which that throws upon you, you can all arrive at the same thing which I have described. I do not mean, however, to say that it would be to the advantage of every man to enter into cattle husban- dry ; I am describing what should be done by those men who would go into it ; and as we must all go into it more or less, let us adopt the rule that we will have the kind adapted to the soil and climate in which we live, and to the neighboring markets. Then I think the whole class of animals will be improved here, and we shall not, as now, be compelled, of neces- sity, as officers of agricultural societies, to bestow premiums upon animals that are not worthy to be driven to an agricultural show. If I have succeeded in opening the debate, Mr. Chair- man, I have accomplished just what you requested me to do. Mr. Perkins. — It is the feed that makes the animal, to a great extent, and we cannot get good animals without good feed. The suggestion has been made here that cattle can be kept a little short in winter. That is not the experience of the people up our way ; and my observation is, that where the cattle are close kept, the people complain of hard times, and the cattle show it ; while those that are well kept show good times, and the people think that the times are good, too. In order that cows may do well during the summer season, they should be well kept through the winter. The farmers up our way in 126 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. Berkshire County, who are most successful in their dairies, keep their stock the best. I used to think, a good many years ago, that if stock were kept a little short in winter they would grow enough more in summer to make it up ; but if an animal grows one or two pounds a day in winter, it is more likely to grow three or four in summer than if it had not grown at all in the winter. The quality of the milk is an object in making butter and cheese, and a dairy cow that is well kept will raise more cream than a cow in a low condition, and make more cheese. The agricultural qualities of Berkshire County have been called in question here a little. Representing a part of that county, I must stand up in its defence. I believe we have as good land in some parts of that county as there is in the State of Massachusetts, or in any other State in the Union. To illustrate that, I will say that I have in mind a man who last year raised sixteen acres of corn, without any manure, with the exception of a little plaster and ashes put in the hill, and sold eight hundred bushels, and kept what he wanted to use, and lie has a large family, and keeps a large stock of cattle. That corn was raised at an expense of only about fifteen cents a busliel for labor. I have in mind another man who has raised eight acres last year, and got between ninety and a hundred bushels to the acre. I have in mind another man there who lias raised his sixty acres in one body. What the result will be I cannot tell you, but it will be something, with corn at $2 a bushel. And tliat was raised without manure. Mr. Stedman, of Chicopee. — I think we shall all agree that the question how to obtain the best dairy cow is of the first importance to Massachusetts farmers. I would suggest, as my opinion, that the best way this can be done is by selecting the best common, or native cows, and crossing them with a thoroughbred bull, and so continuing, using none but thor- oughbred bulls, of some one of the breeds. And in the selection of a bull, we should not only be sure that he is a thoroughbred, but that he is descended from a milking family, as it is well known to those who are conversant with these matters, that there is a vast difference in eacli of the breeds in different families ; some of the families of the Shorthorns, for instance, having cows that produce scarcely milk enough to SECRETARY'S REPORT. 127 feed their calves, while others yield a generous flow, and for a great length of time. This matter has been greatly overlooked. As 1 said, the dairy is of the first importance, yet, at the same time, we must keep in view the production of meat. When good cattle are worth upon the foot $10 a hundred, it is very doubtful whether we can afford to lay aside this consideration entirely, destroy all the male calves, and give our attention wholly to the dairy. I believe the production of meat is a source of profit, and should be connected with the dairy ; and having this in view, it is desirable that we should select animals that possess qualities for the production of meat, size being one, as it is well known that well-proportioned, large animals, bring a larger price per pound than small ones, while they can probably be reared with as little expense. So that in those sections of our State where large cattle will grow to advantage, it is better that we should introduce some of the larger breeds ; and I am free to say that I have found, in most sections of the State, cattle of this description. In Berkshire, in Franklin, in Worcester, and, I believe, very generally, throughout the State, we have pastures that will carry these cattle through the summer, and it seems to me that the great Shorthorns are, upon the whole, about the best cattle for the largest section of our State. Prof. Agassiz. — I had some thought of taking up for the subject of my lecture this evening, the physiological principles of breeding, with reference to what may be done to improve our various kinds of domestic animals ; but as I see that tliese lectures are attended by ladies as well as by gentlemen, I may, perhaps, take this opportunity to make a few remarks upon this subject, which are akin to the present subject of discussion. In the first place, I would say a word with reference to the advantage of small-sized cattle. Allusion has been made to the cattle of Switzerland. In the days when I lived in that beautiful country, I paid little attention to the cattle, or other domesticated animals, or to subjects akin to the objects of this Board, but I have distinct recollections, and one of those recollections bears upon the subject under consideration. It is important to know why we have such extreme differences in the size of our cattle. There is no doubt, that with reference to the production of meat, we should have as large individuals 128 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. as possible ; with reference to the production of milk, we should have the largest amount of production of that kind with the smallest animal, requiring the least amount of food. Now, there is one striking feature in the distribution of cattle through Switzerland : that in the interior parts of the country, in the Alpine districts especially, the cattle are all small, while in the western part of Switzerland, in the subalpine districts, and in the Jura, the cattle are all large. When you inquire into the possible circumstances which produce that difference, you have at once the answer if you look at a geological map ; and here geology appears in direct connection with agricultural pursuits. In those districts of Switzerland which are entirely made up of granite rocks, with talc and mica slates, and gneiss — primitive rocks, as they are called — you find nothing but small cattle. In those regions where the subsoil is formed of limestone, the cattle are large. You see at once the expla- nation. In the one district, the animal has a large supply of limestone with which to build up its bony frame ; in the other, the supply of lime is small, and the animal cannot build up a large frame. Now, let us apply that fact to our purpose. I say, if it is an object to produce a large kind of cattle, you must provide your cattle with lime, that they may build up a large frame. But we have no limestone in Massachusetts, and how shall we do it ? I propose to the intelligent farmers who are interested in this matter an experiment. Let them put some crushed lime in the food of their cattle, and see how that will answer. Let them try in what shape and manner they can increase the size of their cattle by adding chalk to their food, so that they may have the elements out of which to build a large, bony frame. I have no doubt, from the interesting remarks I have heard yesterday and to-day, and the large amount of information I have been able to collect from the lips of so many practical farmers, that, having these suggestions, they will at once know how to apply them. I do not know how to do it. I have never been inter- ested in raising a single cow, so I do not know how to take care of cattle, and would not know what to advise ; but I am a physiologist, and know what are the principles of physiology, and I am satisfied that to raise large cattle, you must introduce into their systems, with their food, a sufficient amount of lime- SECRETARY'S REPORT. 129 stone to build up a large, bony frame, and tbat you must do this artificially, where nature does not provide the cattle with a sufficient amount of lime in the waters from which they drink, and in the rocks against which they rub themselves, to make their bones. With us, in the Jura, or in the canton Freiburg, in the Alps, which is a limestone country, every pail of water contains a large quantity of lime in solution, and every cow that drinks, drinks in bones, or at least lime, with which to make bones. That lime we must supply. Now, with reference to breeding. And here breeding comes in for a share in making these good kinds or poor kinds of cattle. Let us examine what the native animal is ; — and again I say, that when you have these principles before you, I know that, in a very short time, whatever value they have will be applied to the promotion of agricultural improvement. I believe that all our discussions are a little too loose ; that we don't understand all the elements of the question sufficiently to know by numerical value what there is in one and what there is in the other proposition that is discussed. I hear the charac- teristics of a dairy cow spoken of in contrast with those of a beef animal ; but I want to know what there is that makes up two such different animals. Differences in form have been alluded to, and differences in situation have been alluded to also, and these ought to be considered separately ; but there are differences in substance of which I have heard nothing said. I should like to ascertain — and for that experiments must be made which we have not on hand — what is the percentage of bone in the best animal to fatten or to raise for beef, what the percentage of skin, of horn, of hoof, of blood, of lymph, of liver, which goes to make up the sum total of the weight of the ani- mal, and how far there is a difference in those respects between the different kinds of cattle which we raise. No work gives us these facts yet ; but now there is growing up in Cambridge a Museum of Comparative Zoology, in which there is a special department devoted to domestic animals, and I am trying to bring together there, to begin with, skeletons of the different varieties of animals which we raise. I have not been able to get, thus far, any but the- common kinds of these animals, with the exception of a few valuable horses, known as distinguished trotters ; but I should like to obtain for that Museum animals, 17* 130 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. the qualifications of which, during their lifetime, Irave been known, and when such animals die, I wish that gentlemen inter- ested in having these things recorded, would have the kindness to let me have the carcase, especially where the death is acci- dental, because then, when the animal was in full vigor, it will be possible to weigh it, and ascertain its total weight, and then go on to an analyzation, by which it can be ascertained how much the skeleton enters into the weight, how much the flesh, how much the skin, and how much every part, so that we may know, after a number of such experiments, whether there is, in the development of certain portions of the system, a leading influ- ence in producing those qualities which we require. As long as we speak generally, we have no means of ascertaining in what direction our efibrts in breeding or raising cattle must go, in order to secure the animals which we want. Now, with reference to breeding. In breeding, we must remember that every animal has a number of elements in it by which it may be distinguished from every other animal. All the individuals belonging to one kind of cattle, all cows and bulls put together, with their calves, or the whole race of cattle, for instance, have certain properties which distinguish them from the horse, the donkey, the sheep. Now, the primary peculiarity of all animals is that they transmit, generation after generation, that sum total of qualities. Inheritance or trans- mission of qualities is the primary feature of all animals ; and this transmission consists not only in transferring, generation after generation, the general qualities of the whole race, but in a difference which is fundamental. There is always a certain proportion of male and female. Whatever be the qualifications or the peculiarities of the kind of animal, there is that primary difference at once established ; there are so many males and so many females of each kind born, by which the process of repro- duction is maintained. That is one of the primary laws of organization, and that essential difference extends throughout the whole animal kingdom and throughout the whole vegetable kingdom. There is that essential, primary difference between one set of individuals and another set, — that one certain ratio is male and the other is female ; and these two elements combined constitute the means of the transmission of those qualities which are common to them all as a whole. You must, there- SECRETARY'S REPORT. 131 fore, always take* these two elements into consideration in the propagation of animals, — tlic qualities of the two sexes. Now, individual animals, again, have some very important share in this. If I look at this assembly, I see no two indi- viduals alike, and if I go out of doors, the same impression continues. I see no two men nor two women alike ; and if I go. to the farm, I see no two heads of cattle alike. Besides these common features which go to make up humanity, or which go to make up the cow world, the horse world, the donkey world, the sheep world, the pig world — besides these common features, there is individuality noticeable everywhere, and that individuality is marked. Every shepherd knows how to distinguish every individual of the flock he owns. Now, this individuality is not altogether transmissible, as the general properties which go to make up the whole race are ; only a part of these peculiarities of the individual being are trans- mitted, generation after generation ; for you will notice that the children of one family are not all like the father, nor are they all like the mother, nor are they all even a mixture of the two. And what is true of man is true of animals. Everv individual born from the same parents may differ from both parents, or may have a certain degree of resemblance to both parents. Let us, therefore, not forget this second law of reproduction, which consists in a partial transmission of individual character- istics, while there is a total transmission of those general features which go to make up the kind of animal. We never expect to have a horse born from a cow — we expect a calf, a young cow or a young bull ; and we expect that, within a certain limit, that calf will share the properties of either the mother or the father, but we know tliat it will not do this fully. Now, what can we do to ascertain what we shall get ? — for it is on the assumption that, having a male of certain qualities and a female of certain qualities, we can get the best animal out of the two, that we proceed in introducing a certain distinct animal into a herd, with the expectation of improving the progeny of that herd. We may make tremendous mistakes in so doing, and I want to point out the basis of these mis- takes, because they are the foundation of all our disappoint- ments. I am not prepared to tell you how to remedy all these disappointments, but I will point out their sources that you 132 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. may, in your practical wisdom, devise tlie means to obviate them. An individual, however distinguished he may be in himself, has, in consequence of tliis law of inheritance, combined in himself a variety of elements which may reappear in his progeny. Now, remember that an animal may be as distin- guished an individual as you could wish to have as the head of aMesirable progeny on your farm, and yet, notwithstanding these apparently eminent qualifications, he may be vitiated for the purpose for which you want him because of some character- istics of his ancestors. An animal is not made up of the elements of his father and mother alone ; he has also the ele- ments of his grandfather and of his grandmother, and he has the elements of his whole race behind. Now, within certain limits, these ancestral elements come up again, and they come up again especially in the third generation. There is a singu- lar law which pervades male animated nature throughout, which is recognized as a physiological principle, and that is, that some features of an animal are transmitted, not so much directly to his immediate descendants, but to his grandchildren, to the third generation. You must, therefore, before you can be sure of proceeding in the right way, know the ancestry of your breeding animals for at least three generations back ; otherwise you may have cropping out the characteristics of the grandfather or grandmother where you least expected them ; and the grandfather or grandmother of that distin- guished individual may be the last animal you would want to have on your farm. Do not, then, trust animals that are trumpeted all over the country as distinguished animals, before you know what were their grandparents, otherwise you may be greatly disappointed and deceived. That is the first condition of successful breeding. You must know that you have a family which has ancestral qualities to be depended upon before you introduce that animal as an element of growth into your herd. I am glad that I do not know any of the valuable and cele- brated animals in the community, because I am able to speak with a degree of independence which I should not possess if I knew my friend A, B, or C had a valuable bull, or a valuable horse, which yielded him so much income, and whose reputa- tion it was desirable should be kept up. I liave no such friends, SECRETARY'S REPORT. 133 I am happy to say here, and, therefore, I can speak upon prin- ciples, and shield you, by those principles, from the mischief you might do by trusting too indiscriminately to representations which* may be, after all, very indifferently founded. I think that the criterion of success will be the progeny of successive generations. I would trust such animals as have descend- ants, and as show a fine family in several generations, and out of such a family I would select my individuals for further propagation. Now, this matter of the partial transmission of qualities con- sists of other elements besides this male element, — there is the female — and there are other elements besides those of ancestral inheritance, which are to be considered. There are the qual- ities of herd, there are the qualities of species, there are the qualities of race. And here we must again inquire into two very different subjects. The qualities of breed and the quali- ties of species are totally distinct, and I think that the proper distinction is not always made. My friend, who spoke so learn- edly, so fully, and with such an amount of experience, yester- day, on the culture of the grape, made, in one of his statements a mistake (if I am not mistaken myself,) in that very particu- lar, when he used an expression which should apply only in one given sense and not in an indiscriminate one. A hybrid is only the offspring between two different species. A hybrid can never be produced between two varieties of the same species. Mr. BtJLL. — I used the common horticultural term. Prof. Agassiz. — I know, sir ; but let us be careful to intro- duce into our discussions only such definite language as makes misapprehension impossible ; for we want to have that precision which shall be beyond the possibility of cavil from misapprehen- sion, and beyond the possibility of misinterpretation from loose- ness of statement. How shall we secure this with reference to these different kinds of animals ? By using just such terms as will designate the one we want to designate, and that only. Now, species are formed in nature, with all qualifications ; they are God's creations. Breeds are formed under the fostering care of man, and differ according to the circumstances under which they have been raised, — they are human manufactures. That is the difference between a breed and a species. AH our cattle are of one species, and they produce nothing but cattle ; 134 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. and every species produces notliing but its own kind. Breeds are the result of the interference of man with these creations of God, in the manner wliich will suit his peculiar pursuits or objects, and they are his work. Men have made breeds. They are not God's creation, they are man's production; while species man never made. We have found them in nature ; we have subdued them, we have appropriated them to our pur- poses ; they have been endowed with certain peculiarities which are pliable, and they are capable of being impressed in various ways by man — one species more than another — so that different breeds, more or less different, can be obtained. Among dogs, which are more pliable, physically, than any other of the domesticated animals, the breeds have a range which is astonishing. Compare a bulldog with a greyhound, a King Charles' spaniel with a mastiff, — what an extraordinary difference ! There is no such difference among cattle or horses. And why ? Because by nature this species was more pliable to influences than others. Now man has to apply himself to that pliability, and impress upon these animals those peculiarities which are useful or desirable for him. Now, these specific differences and these breed differences are of a different kind. A species transmits its characteristics unmistakably and always, and the sum total of its specific char- acter is transmitted. A breed, being the product of man, transmits its peculiarities, its qualifications, only partially, and only as long as those things which produce them or maintain them are at work. Cease to take care of these animals in the way in which the differences produced may be maintained, and the breed itself runs out. You cannot perpetuate them without taking at least care that those conditions which will maintain the breed differences as they have been produced, are continued. Now, when you propagate animals, ther*e is a certain limita- tion to the fecundity. Only individuals of the same species are absolutely fertile with one another. Individuals of one species witli individuals of another species have only a limited fertility. You may be sure to see individuals of the same kind bring forth individuals of that kind and no other; and these individ- uals, you may be sure, will be capable of reproducing their kind in turn, generation after generation. But cross individuals of two different species with one another, and you at once obtain SECRETARY'S REPORT. 135 hybrid ; that is, what we call hybrids, or what we call mules ; and these hybrids or mules always propagate individuals of two different kinds, and their fecundity is limited ; sometimes so extremely limited that even the first generation is sterile ; sometimes partially fertile by a return to the parent stock. Between themselves, the individuals born from two different species are hardly ever fertile ad infinitum. I will quote an example to show what I mean more distinctly. The horse is one species, the ass is another species. Horse with horse pro- duces horse, ad infinitum ; ass with ass produces ass, ad infinitum. But horse with ass produces a mule, or a hybrid. Now, that hybrid always has part of the character of one parent and part of the character of the other parent. It is not a representative of any species, but it is a half-breed. And here the English names designate truly the characteristic of that animal. It is a " half-breed," or a " hybrid," or a '• mule." Those three names apply to that kind of animal, and they should never be used to designate any other. The word " hybrid," the word " mule," and the word "half-breed," should never be used except to designate the progeny between two different species. And that progeny will differ according to the character of the father or the mother. The offspring of the male horse with the female ass is not the same as the offspring of the male ass and the female horse, by any means. What is commonly called a mule is the offspring of the jack with the mare. We do not raise the offspring of the horse with the ass ; but in France they are sometimes raised, and are known there as bardots. Now, the bardot is a very different animal from our mule ; it has a greater resemblance to a horse, only it is a small-sized donkey. The form of the head, the hoof, and the tail are those of the horse. Now, the reverse is the case with our mule, which has the size of the mare ; but the 'form of the head, tail, and hoof, of the donkey. May we not, by these crosses, ascertain, in a measure, what kind of character the male will transmit to his progeny, and what kind of character the female will transmit to her progeny ? I suppose that a thorough analysis of the difference which exists between the bardot and the mule, as compared with the horse and the ass, would give us a large number of very valuable hints as to what we may expect in the transmis- sion of the qualities of the male and of the female to the 136 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. progeny ; for we have not yet made the experiments in breed- ing that will enable us to ascertain that with any degree of certainty, because, in all the experiments of which I have been able to find any record, the breeding individuals have been taken as if they had no ancestry — as if no qualifications could be transmitted to the progeny besides those of the mother and of the father. And yet, if we look to this law of ancestral trans- mission, we know that any progeny may show characteristics which are neither those of the mother nor of the father, but those of a remote ancestor, three generations back. Now, therefore, we must begin our experiments with refer- ence to the transmission of qualifications from the male or the female, if we would have at all a trustworthy basis. And how shall we proceed ? Here I propose one problem for solution. I have no results to give, gentlemen, and you will at once see how difficult it will be to obtain a result at all ; what extraordi- nary, costly and difficult conditions must be met in order to obtain a result that shall have any value whatever. But I think the time has come when we must stop arguing on a loose basis, when we must begin to riiake experiments that shall have all that scientific accuracy on which we can rely. I am snre that Massachusetts farmers are the men to do this work for the progress of agriculture, for I see from their discussions that whatever tliey do, they do thoroughly ; that whatever operations they enter into they analyze to their satisfaction. Now, if they would ascertain what are the laws of inheritance, or in reference to breeding, let them first secure individuals from which they have eliminated the elements of ancestral transmission. That is the first thing to do ; just as when astronomers compute their observations ; they begin by looking over the observations, in order to know which they are to take into account, and which not. There are observations made by unskilful hands, and if they were taken into consideration, in a computation in which a thousandth part of a minute is an element of great impor- tance, you sfce at once that a single incorrect observation would vitiate all the results of the good ones. Now, the first thing an astronomer does when he goes to work on his observations, is, to see how the observations were made, and on looking over the books, he sees at once that here are observations tiuit he must leave out, page after page ; and here SECRETARY'S REPORT. 137 are observations that look as if they had been made with the proper care, and these he will take as the basis of his computa- tion. Now, you must proceed in the same way, and when you read of satisfactory results obtained by some experiment, you must not shrink from the painful investigation as to whether it was made with proper care, and a due consideration of all the elements which should enter into the computation. Therefore, tell your friends, and tell yourselves, when you are satisfied that they and you have made mistakes, that these previous observa- tions are good for nothing, and go to work. Learn to tell your- selves that what you have done is worth nothing, and then you will be on the road of progress. It is difficult, but it is the advantage the scientific man has over the practical man. The training of scientific men consists in nothing else but in learning how to set aside their own doings, to criticize their own observations, so that they shall know what is worth listening to and what not. That is the source, of our strength, that is the foundation of our value in community — that we learn (and that is our special office,) how to criticize whatever we do. Now, I think, from what I see here, that you will learn that very soon, and when you have learned that, you will proceed witli confidence. The first thing to eliminate in this experiment concerning the transmissibility of the qualifi- cations of any animal is the ancestral element. How will you do that ? By breeding one or two generations in-and-in, without affinity. Here I state a limitation which is not perhaps understood, and I will explain. In order to have stock on which you can make a sound experiment, you must breed together individuals as closely allied as possible, but which shall have no family ties. There is one important element when you speak of breeding in-and-in. I have never heard the distinction referred to that I now make. Breeding in-and-in may mean, according to the way in v/hich I hear it discussed, breeding brother and sister, or father and mother, as well as breeding together individuals which resemble one another very closely. Now, there is a vast difference between these two modes of breeding in-and-in. Breed Anglo-Saxon with Anglo- Saxon, does not mean that brother and sister should intermarry The breed of Anglo-Saxon is improved by the intermarriage of Anglo-Saxons, but of Anglo-Saxons who have no family ties ; 18* 138 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. but the breed will be spoiled if you breed in-and-in Anglo- Saxons, brother and sister, or mother and father. One is a moral crime ; the other is the foundation of national superi- ority. You see at once the difference. Now do the same thing on your farm. Breed in-and-in, but do not permit incest among your animals. Breed in-and-in those who are of the same kind, but do not breed in-and-in those which have such close family ties that you would breed disease in them by the closeness of the blood. That distinction is the first fundamental distinction of all good breeding. You must breed in-and-in, to have the proper stock to experiment upon, for several generations, so that you shall have animals that will hold the same ancestral relation to one another. You see, therefore, that to procure a proper animal for experiment will take you several generations. You cannot get that easily with cows ; you may get it more easily with sheep ; and in a series of experiments which I have proposed to some of my friends, I have advised them to take sheep, in order sooner to have the elements upon which to make sound and valuable experiments. Now, when you have the third and fourth generation obtained in that way, by the connection of individuals closely allied to one another, but which have no blood relation to each other, tlien you have individuals from which you have eliminated the ancestral element that might re-appear in the next gener- ation. Suppose you prepare in this way a number of coarse- wool sheep, so that you have male and female individuals which have no blood left except that of their own, and you prepare in the same way another number of merino individuals. Now, you cross them both ways — merino ram with coarse-wool ewe, and, vice versa, coarse-wool ram with merino ewe, and you will very soon ascertain what is the transmission of one male with one kind of female, and of another male with another kind of female. You will then have experiments which will begin to be valuable with reference to the law of transmission of the peculiarities of breed through breed ; of that crossing between breed and breed which is so different from the intercrossing of individuals of two different species. The law of the transmis- sion of qualities from breed to breed, in crossings of breeds, is yet to be ascertained. We have nothing but guess-work about it so far. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 139 The discussion of the question was continued by Mr. Fisk of Shelburne, Dr. Loring, Mr. Stedman, and others, till the Board adjourned. Afternoon Session. — Mot at two and one-half o'clock. Mr. Lathrop in the chair. A lecture was delivered on THE PIABITS OF INSECTS IN THEIR RELATIONS TO MAN, « BY MR. FRANCIS G. SANBORN, OF BOSTON, Ento7nologist to the Board. Mr. President and Gentlemen, — I have been requested to address you at this time, upon the subject of Economical Ento- mology, or the science of insects, their habits and transforma- tions ; with a view to ascertain the easiest mode of destroying such species as are proved injurious to our crops, or of protect- ing and cultivating those which are practically our friends. In the very outset of my task, I am met with the barrier upraised by popular prejudice, and the general contempt for, or ignorance of the nomenclature of this science. With no desire to, be hypercritical, I cannot ignore the fact that those very persons who would be the first to notice, and ridicule such misnomers as the " Devon horse " or the " Southdown bull," speak with the most perfect complacency of the " rosebug," the " seventeen-year locust," and the " flying grasshopper ; " terms which sound to the full as ludicrously in the ear of a naturalist. This condition of affairs cannot be reformed at once, and yet the prospect of a general knowledge of natural history grows brighter from day to day. When we shall have learned to teach the results of the past, and the details of the present, instead of the details of the past, and the minutiae of the remote, we shall have accomplished more for the advancement of that knowledge which is power, than the most sanguine apostles of practical education ever dreamed of. Is it the most important to the embryo farmer, to acquire and retain the names of the founders of Rome, and the number of rivers emptying into the Caspian Sea, or to be able to distin- guish between the sorghum and the Indian corn, the hawk and the robin, or the cutwc^m and its destroyers ? 140 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. In our excessive devotion to antiquity, we seem to me to resemble tlie captive, who, after weeks of toil has succeeded in digging his way through the walls of his dungeon, to liberty and light, but who delays his escape, in order to count the frag- ments of rock he has left behind him. Not that I would attempt to decry the advantages of a so-called liberal education ; not that I derive no practical lessons, nor worthy examples from the history of man's life and deeds in years bygone ; but that I would devote at least an equal proportion of time to studying the works of the Creator which are the past, the present, and the future. Let those subjects with which the learner must grapple in his every-day life, be i\\Q first inculcated. Let him be taught not to look at, but to see, and let the simple facts of natural history take the precedence of vague traditions of the world's childhood, and superficial accounts of foreign countries. Thus only will he be enabled to solve, the now impenetrable mysteries of his surroundings, and to distinguish between the foes and the friends of his prosperity. We cannot afford, God help us, to laugh at each other's ignorance, but our descendants will not hear those constant misnomers that have shocked my, perhaps, too sensitive ear, and may reasonably smile at the m'an who, after forty years' experience of cattle, discovers that they have no front teeth in the upper jaw. For ourselves, we must glean what information we can in the intervals of labor, and guard our crops as best we may. The universal search for an insect elixir mortis, of easy appli- cation and speedy effect, bids fair to be rewarded in the sea of petroleum or coal oil, which now floods the country. This immense supply of material which has given a new impetus to the inventive genius of our mechanics, and drawn already to a great extent on the resources of the chemist, ought not to be neglected by the agriculturist. Its cheapness and efficacy in destroying insect-life are unanswerable arguments in its favor. Are you afraid that it will injure your fruit ti^ees, or render the soil unfit for the growth of your crops ? You have only to try it ; experiment faithfully with its different modifications and combinations for a year or two, and do not confine it to a single crop, nor application. Then, if you |ire not satisfied of its utility and necessity, discard it, and not iill then, I speak advisedly. I have had personal experience of its u js for 'several SECRETARY'S REPORT. 141 years. I have applied it to nests of the tent-caterpillar, the apple-tree pest, and effectually dislodged them. I have poured it around the roots of vegetables, attacked l)y various maggots, and prevented their ravages without injuring the plant in the least perceptible degree. I am fully satisfied that a large num- ber of noxious insects, especially those infesting our root crops and fruit trees, may be successfully treated with this oil in the crude state, or with a soap made from it and diluted with water to the same extent as that prepared from whale oil ; namely, for trees of thick bark, a pound of the soap to a gallon of water, and for leaves and roots, the proportion of water may be increased to five gallons. Upon the bark of various fruit and shade trees, arc found minute scale-insects belonging to the genera Coccus, Lecanium, and Aspidiotus. In the spring, about a week after the bursting of the leaf buds, their eggs are hatched, and the tender young, spreading over the tree, commence sucking the sap. A thorough painting of the bark, with the petroleum or its soap, for two or three days after the escape of the young, will be found an infal- lible remedy. The borers of the apple, quince, and peach, may be prevented from laying their eggs by the same application, or if already laid, these niaj^ be destroyed in tlie same manner. It is highly desirable that an extended and thorough trial be made of this substance upon different crops, throughout the State, and that reports be furnished to the State Board of its effects, its proper strength, and mode of application, in order that we may obtain additional facts, and circulate the results more widely. I shall proceed to give a concise account of some of our native insect enemies, their history, and mode of attack, with suggestions as to the best methods of repelling them. Among our fruit trees, we find the apple attacked by a number of insects of different groups, varying in the locality of their ravages from the roots beneath the soil to the extremities of the branches, the leaves, and fruit ; some of them subsisting solely on this tree ; and others, common to the pear, the quince, and even to some forest and shade trees. When the leaves turn to a paler or yellowish hue, without any perceptible cause, and the tree seems to be enfeebled, a removal of the earth immediately about the roots, will frequently discover numbers of minute plant-lice or aphides. This is the plural 142 - BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. of aphis, a Greek word, meaning an exhauster or depriver of strength, belonging to the genus Pemphigus , of Hartig, the Eriosoma or woolly-bodied aphides, mentioned by Dr. Harris. These are busily engaged in sucking the sap, and if they have been at work for more than one season, there will frequently be excrescences of solid wood, varying from the size of a mustard seed to two or three inches in diameters, growing from the roots of the tree like bunches of small potatoes ; these are caused by the punctures of the plant-lice, in the same way as the galls upon the oak, and swellings of the stem of the golden-rod by other species of insects. Among these tubers, and clustered around the roots, are the young, or larvce, of a light color, and about one-twenty-fifth of an inch in length, having a small thread, of a whitish substance, extending from the tip of the abdomen. At the close of the season, the adult insects of about one-fourth of an inch in length, and furnished with wings, will be found. These are of a black color, but almost covered with a bluish-white down, upon the upper surface, resembling fine wool ; their wings are transparent, and folded over the body like a roof. Their fecundity is a marvellous theme, and is a part of the history of the race of plant-lice. According to Reaumur, one aphis may become, in a single season, the progenitor of over five thousand millions of descendants. The egg deposited in the fall is hatched in the spring, each one producing a female ; she in the course of a few hours becomes a mother and gives birth, not to an egg, but to a living daughter, who in turn, may be in a week from the commencement of her existence, a great- grandmother. This continual propagation of females continues through the summer, when the males again occur among the births, and both sexes then acquiring wings, copulate and deposit eggs for the spring brood. With such enormous powers of multiplication, we might reasonably apprehend the speedy destruction of all our crops by this little creature, were it not that their insect enemies and other causes tend to reduce their numbers materially, and keep in check this vast army of suckei^, or exhausters, as they are significantly named. The little black-spotted red beetle, which children call the lady-bird, the lace-winged fly, or golden-eye, and the black and yellow-striped flies of the Syrphus tribe, as well as internal Ilymenopterous parasites, are continually feed- SECRETARY'S REPORT. 143 ing* upon them. In fact, the autlior previously alluded to, considers them " the very corn " sown for the use of other insects. "We, however, prefer to compare them to herds of cattle, inasmuch as on the other hand they are protected and cherished by the ants, who are repaid by the honey-like excre- tions of the aphis, yielded at the lightest touch from two small tubes near the extremity of the body. In turning over a stone in the field, who has not seen the busy and anxious ants remov- ing, with the utmost care, not only their own defenceless young to a place of safety, but also showing an equal regard and solicitude for the little whitish oval plant-louse, whose six minute feet are barely able to support her, and totally unfitted for running away. Tenderly picking her up in their mandibles, her sturdy guardians make off at a rapid rate, and after all are in safety, and the bustle caused by the sudden unroofing of their residence has subsided, the little aphis is reassured by the gentle caresses of her protectors, and gives down her honeyed milk to their skilful manipulations. The species infesting the roots of tlie apple is called Pemphig-us pyri; a very similar species which lives upon the roots of several annual plants, has received the name radicis ; these and some other species living beneath the surface of the ground are almost invariably accom- panied by ants in the manner referred to, and inasmuch as the laws of warfare class all who are not avowed friends or neutrals as enemies, we need not hesitate to deluge the little cattle and their keepers with strong soapsuds or lye, and by whelming the whole in one common ruin, save our trees a large unnecessary expenditure of sap. Two or three other species of this same tribe are found in immense numbers drawing their subsistence at the other end of the -line. On the young shoots and small green leaves of the apple-tree, are found the Aphis mali, of Fabricius ; the tender shoots and flowers of the cherry are fre- quently swarming with the Aphis cerasi of Fabricius. Those of the plum, the peaches, and other fruit trees, are often attacked in the same manner by other species. The aphis of the apple is quite dark-colored, with a greenish abdomen ; that of the cherry almost or entirely black. Others, as the aphis of the rose, are of a pure green color. The aphides of the leaves and twigs are attended, like their brethren of the roots by an escort, or rather guard of ants. Tiiese cannot pitch their tents like the keepers 144 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. of the root-lice, in the immediate vicinity of their flocks and herds, but are obliged, like larger owners of stock in outlying pastures, to make frequent visits to their proteges, and as from their exposed situation these are liable to the attack of enemies unknown to the subterraneans, their protectors maintain a con- stant watch, both by day and night, relieved with great regu- larity. Their duties are to remove the cast-off skins of their charge, and to drive away any marauder. It is a task of some difficulty, in many cases, to prevent the active and wily ichneu- mon-parasites from inserting their eggs in the bodies of the lice, and even the winged advantages of the former scarcely enable her to come off without the loss of a leg, left in the jaws of the enraged ant, while the lady-bird, the syrphus-fly, and the lace- wing are obliged to deposit their eggs at some little distance from the colony to avoid awakening suspicion, and trust to Providence for the safety of their future young. The latter insect, for the better preservation of her eggs, deposits each upon a slender stem of stiff and elastic silk, spun frOin her abdo- men, of such a length that the ants cannot reach it, and so fine that they can neither cut it with ther powerful jaws, nor climb it. How often, in passing a solitary hickory tree in the month of June, do we hear a buzzing as of hundreds of bees among its branches, and on looking up discover them, with wasps and flies without number, continually hovering and alighting and starting back from the green leaves, where no blossom or other supposable attraction is visible ? Closer examination will dis- cover myriads of minute plant-lice constantly ejecting the sweet honey-dew in such quantity as to stain and render the leaves absolutely filthy'with this excretion. Ants innumerable, stream- ing up and down the trunk, and covering the leaves, now strok- ing the backs of their little purveyors, and now rushing valiantly forward to the great discomfiture of some eager wasp, who hoped to make a delicious repast on the abundant sweets, and had not the slightest intention of injuring the feeble aphides. This tree, after nightfall, becomes a centre of attraction to various moths or night butterflies, and furnishes a " rich col- lecting ground " to the entomologist, who, armed with his net, attached to a stout pole, jars from its boughs a shower of deli- cate creatures of various plumage, and captures them for future study. The leaves, on trees and other plants attacked by the SECRETARY'S REPORT, 145 aphis very generally attract attention by being more or less curled or turned backward, and their surface, as well as that of the twigs, frequently becomes blackened and dirty. Dr. Fitch, of New York, in his invaluable report states that washing the bark with a solution of sal soda, not only removes this filth, but being absorbed by the sap, the tincture becomes unpalatable to the aphides, and causes them to desert the tree. A writer of some experience recommends syringing the trees with lye, or soapsuds, which destroys all insects that it touches, but as many are protected by the curled leaf from the action of these prepar- ations, the bending down of the branches where practicable into a tub of strong suds, is more certain in its effects. Rubbing soft-soap about the trunk and limbs, two or three times during the season, is approved by some. A small garden engine, or even a cheaply constructed syringe that can be made by any prentice tinman, is a convenient instrument, a tube, fifteen to twenty inches in length, and two and a half in diameter, closed with a perforated cap of tin at one end. The piston or plunger can be whittled out in a few minutes, an old broom or hoe- handle, wrapped with tow or rags, answering every purpose. This simple machine will be found very useful in throwing various solutions upon foliage that could not, otherwise, be reached, and will last, with proper care, for years. On the bark of the apple, the pear, the plum, and the grape we find, frequently, minute and singularly formed creatures not so much resembling an insect as a scab or scurf, and so closely adherent to the bark and resembling it in color as to appear like a mere evolution of its cuticle. These little animals are called Coccidcc, or scale insects, and are arranged in different genera or groups according to their structure, habits and metamorphoses. Although differing in external appearance so greatly from the aphides of the roots and branches, they are yet of the same class and derive their sustenance in the same manner from the sap of the tree, being furnished with beaks or siphons of a pre- cisely similar construction. The species inhabiting the apple, is of the form of the muscle-shell, about one-tenth of an inch in length, and of a brownish color. Their eggs are laid or rather extruded beneath the body of the female, which then shrinks up into the concave shell, and in death continues to protect and shelter the future brood. They hatch about the last week 19* 146 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. in May, or a little later, and the young scatter in different direc- tions npon the trunk and limits. This seems to be the time to remove or destroy them to the best advantage, as their tender bodies are very susceptible to such applications as soap-suds or lye. Some, however, prefer to brush or scrape off the parent shells and the loose, rough bark together; a hard rubbing of the smaller infested limbs with coarse cloths, if faithfully attended to is very efficacious. Dr. Harris recommends the application of a wash made of " two parts soft-soap to eight of water, brought to the consistency of thick whitewash by the addition of lime ; " " a solution of two pounds of potash or a quart of common 'salt in two gallons of water will also destroy them." The grape is attacked by an insect of this family, of a larger size and of a more reddish brown color and rounded form than the apple scale ; these will be frequently found at the junction of the smaller branches with the stem. In the State Cabinet there are specimens of scale insects both from the vine and the pear tree, which are very closely related to, if not identical with the Coccus cryptogamus of Dalman, and may have been introduced from Europe upon imported fruit trees. The actual shell of the female is quite small, of a reddish brown color ; but the object which most readily attracts attention is the flattened scale seem- ingly composed of a dirty white wax, very thin, and of a more rounded outline than the apple scale, resembling somewhat in form one valve of the oyster shell ; one extremity of this carries the female's body-case, and other shells are seen scattered upon and adhering closely to the bark in the vicinity. Dr. Harris considers these the pupa cases of the male. The whitish scale is composed of the excretions from the body of the female, and serves to shelter the young in the same manner as the entire case of the female apple scale. The adult males of most if not all of the CoccidcB are extremely minute, but furnished with wings and other organs as perfect in their microscopic details as those of the largest insect. Our oaks and other forest trees are frequently attacked by other species of these little sap-suckers, varying somewhat in form, but all easily recognized as belonging to tliis class, and the remedies to be applied are the same already recommended for those of the apple. Some insects of this group are extremely useful to mankind in the arts and manufactures. The Cochineal, a bright red dye too well known SECRETARY'S REPORT. 147 to require description, is produced from the bodies of the little Coccus cacti of Mexico. The Shell-lac, from which sealing-wax and several valuable varnishes and cements are n[i^de, is the secretion of i\\Q Coccus ficus, and the sweet and nutritious manna of eastern fame is deposited by the Coccus manniparus. In continuing our investigation of the insect exhausters upon the apple-tree, we occasionally discover a light brown, flattish bug, of gigantic size compared with his congeners we have been examining, being about half an inch in length, and furnished with the invariable weapon of his tribe, a jointed tube bent beneath him, or inserted in the tender twigs, and sucking busily away as if his life depended on it, which indeed it does. He is intimately related to the squash-bug, and to those other delicious morsels which we often eat on blackberries and raspberries, and has, like them, a sort of Ethiopian odor, of which he makes no secret when handled. He is of rather angular outline, approach- ing a pentagonal or five-sided form, and belongs to the large group called Pentatompides from their peculiar cut, and to the still larger one Scutata from the immense size of the scutel or shield-shaped plate which fits into the triangular space between the thorax and the folded wings, and in most insects is of very insignificant dimensions. In his case, however, it is about one- half of the breadth of his whole body, and not far from a third of its length. His wings are neatly folded over each other at the point, but if we raise them with a pin, we find that the half of the upper wing nearest the head, is of a firm, stiff texture, and the rest as fine and thin as those of fly or wasp. From this in connection with his other idiosyncrasies we learn that he belongs to the true bug-order, the Hemiptera or half-wings of some authors, and the Heteroptera or dissimilar-wings of others. If he were subject to like passions with ourselves, he might well be proud that his order had furnished the popular American title of bugs to so many other insects which have no legal claim to that distinction. Far from exhibiting any vanity, however, he is merely thinking of making his escape ; and if not checked in his mischievous career, by the timely pressure of the thumb and finger, or if his captor be fastidious, the boot-heel, will be off in an instant to some other tree to found a new colony. On the lower side of a green leaf his spouse makes her preparations for the expected addition to the family. 148 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. " Unseemly stains succeed ; which nearer viewed By microscopic arts, small eggs appear, Dire fraught with insect life ; alas ! too soon ffhey burst their filmy jail and crawl abroad, Bugs of uncommon shape — " *very much like their respected parents, in all but size and wings ; and blest with a remarkable appetite. This they imme- diately set about satisfying, and never being weaned, keep up a continual sucking, till overtaken by the fatal shower of soap- suds or kerosene. These deadly poisons to their whole race will reach them, even if snugly clustered beneath the broad leaves of the squash-vine, or clinging to the topmost waving twig of the apple-tree. Even their more active cousins, the leaf-hoppers, who feast uninterruptedly upon the succulent leaves of the vine, and at the slightest alarm, spring off in a glancing shower, may yet find their shady retreats invaded by an oily flood they can neither stem nor stomach. But the exhausters of the sap are only a part of the great army that forage upon our apple-tree. While these are levying contributions upon the milk and honey, another detachment is cutting off the wood, another stripping it of its foliage, and still another drawing an extensive internal revenue from its fruit. Let us look, for a time, to the main body, who, by their heaps of saw-dust, must have been long engaged. Near the surface of the ground, we find little concretions of reddish castings adher- ing to the bark, or piled up in a heap, on the ground, beneath a small hole, from which the sap is exuding. These are chips, and the excretions of the apple-tree borer, the two-striped or white Saperda, a very handsome, long-horned beetle, of a bluish- white color, with three chocolate-colored bands upon its back, extending from head to tip, and a little less than three-quarters of an inch in length. He is not so often met with in his beau- tiful adult condition, because he flies only by night, and after his change from a motionless pupa to a winged and active beetle is effected, he waits until after dark to make his exit from the larval burrow. If a sharpened wire, barbed near the point, be inserted in the small opening indicated by the castings and twisted about, it will very often bring forth the fleshy, whitish larva. Or, by cutting away the bark and the wood, around the hole, with a knife or gouge, the grub may be exposed and SECRETARY'S REPORT. 149 extracted. It is supposed to continue in its young or larva state from two to three years after the egg is deposited, nearly all of this time being employed in gnawing away the wood of the tree, and enlarging its residence. In this stage, it is a pale-yellow, cylindrical grub, less than an inch in length, and a quarter of an inch in diameter, at the broadest part, just behind the head. This is of a polished brown, furnished with black jaws or man- dibles, and with a few scattered hairs. On each side of the body, nine spiracles or breathing pores, of a brown color, are distinctly visible. It is sought with eager avidity by the wood- peckers, who, by tapping on the tree, discover the hidden bur- row by the hollow sound, and with their powerful beaks soon dig it out and devour it. We can greatly assist the woodpecker in relieving our apple-tree of the borers, if we rub the bark with soap in early spring, not once, but repeatedly, especially after a rain. And we should not confine this operation to the lower part of the trunk, but make a faithful application also to the axils of the lower limbs, for this borer, if eggs have been laid thickly near the ground will not risk the danger of starvmg its progeny by adding other mouths to the superabundance of eaters at this spot, but seeks other places higher upon the tree. These corners or notches, also, are the favorite haunts of other species of harmful insects, and the simple application of soft-soap, rubbed well into the bark, will not only destroy such eggs and larvee as may be already there, but will also deter others from depositing their young in a place which their instinct shows them to be unsafe. Another borer of different appearance, the Buprestis femorata ; a flattened oval metallic beetle, with much shorter antennas and feet than the preceding is frequently found in the same locali- ties. Its habits are so similar to those of the saperda that the same remedies prescribed for that will be found available also for this. The larva is much more flattened than that of the other, and its outline bears a striking resemblance to that of a battle-door or round-headed gimblet-screw, rapidly tapering as it does from a broad, flat segment back of the head to a narrow and rounded tip. It is of the same yellowish color and fleshy character as the last described. These two borers belonging, the one to a group nearly related to the snapping beetles, the parents of the destructive wireworm, and the other, a type of 150 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. the longicorns or long-horned beetles, are good representatives of a numerous and highly injurious class of insects. All of these attack, in a not dissimilar manner, the fruit, forest, and shade trees. One of the most hurtful parasites of the peach is the Buprestis divaricata, a burnished, coppery beetle, of elliptical form, with wing covers, which spread apart at the tips, measuring about four-fifths of an inch in length. This insect attacks also the wild cherry, and sometimes is found beneath the bark of the common cultivated varieties. The largest species of the group inhabiting the United States is found quite commonly in New England, preying upon the different species of pines, and aver- ages over an inch in length. The first specimens on record were received from Virginia, by an English collector of insects, Dru Drury, who described and named it from this circumstance, Buprestis virginica. The beetles of this class may be readily distinguished by their compact and more or less elliptical form, their short, stout feet, and their short, saw-toothed antennae. They are in general of a brilliant metallic lustre, and some of our own species, as well as in a greater degree those of tropical countries, resemble precious- stones, from the wonderful beauty and variety of colors with which tliey are adorned. The long- horned beetles are very numerous in their species and forms, but can scarcely fail to be recognized as belonging to the borer family, by any one who has devoted a few weeks, even, to the collection and study of insects. Some of the most insidious enemies of the pine-tree belong to this class, and two or three of our New England species have antennae of three and four inches in length. The largest species known is found in South and Central America, and frequently measures from the tip of its fore feet to the end of the abdomen, ten or twelve inches. We do not dwell at any length upon these borers, because the mode of attack and the signs of their presence in trees are so much alike that the means of destroying them need be but little varied. Pcrliaps one of the little group of bark beetles has made a lodgment beneath the bark of our apple-tree, and per- forated it with numerous little punctures, as if made with a pin. On removing the bark, which is easily done, for the little creatures have almost separated it from the wood, we find an infinity of small cylindrical burrows, running between the bark t SECRETARY'S REPORT. 151 and the wood, and in them many httle reddish-1)rown and hlack beetles, scarcely one-tenth of an inch long, very much resem- bling a very short bit of fine wire, so closely does the thorax fit to the wing covers, the head being almost concealed and the feet very short. This insect has been named by Dr. Fitch, Tomicus mali, or the bark-beetle of the apple. Another of this group, the Tomicus pyri, of Peck, or pear- blight beetle, injures the trunk and the twigs of the apple, pear and other fruit trees in a similar way, and even continues its excavations deeper into the wood, commencing its operations close to a bud where the egg is laid. It is of similar appearance to the last species, but about twice its size. Some of the bur- rows and galleries mined beneath the bark by this group of minute creatures are of singular regularity, one excavating a perfectly straight gallery for several inches, and then con- structing little cells, or short burrows on each side, like courts, leading into a main street. The burrows of another species from their reseml)lance to letters, have obtained for it the name of ti/pog-raphus, or the printer bark-beetle. In some cases, the injury done by these little animals is so great that the only remedy seems to be the cutting off and burning of the limbs affected, but where the possibility of preventing it occurs, we shall find the thorough painting of the twigs and branches with thick soap-suds especially useful. With low branching trees, this may be easily done before the leaves have made their appear- ance, and the dipping of the ends of the shoots into a pail of the mixture, will better insure this reaching into every joint and crevice. When the tender leaves unfold their green sur- face to the spring sun, and begin to breathe in the warm and exhilarating atmosphere through every pore, starting the sap to renewed life, and increasing in size and beauty every hour, we find hundreds of hungry creatures, ready and anxious to begin their work of devastation and revel in the rich supply of succulent food spread out before them. Among the first are the little web-worms, or tent caterpillars, who have escaped from their winter quarters a day or two before the leaves, and have been living since then upon the nutritious gelatine, which their mother provided some eight or ten months before for the double purpose, and spread over the embryo brood to serve as a warm blanket through the winter, and two or three days 152 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. rations in May. These leave the cluster of eggs, and advancing to the nearest fork select an eligible camping-ground, and pitch their modest tent. The leaders then depart on a foraging expedition, being very careful to leave behind them a delicate silken clue, that they may find their way home when they have obtained supplies. They soon discover the delicate foliage, and fall ravenously to work, reinforced every moment by stragglers from the rear, directed along the limb by the silken thread of their bolder brethren, which increases in breadth and thickness with every traveller, who is particularly careful to keep up the condition of the highway. In a few hours they are stuffed to repletion, and are obliged to return to camp, and let out their now outgrown uniforms, which they do by splitting them down down the back, and leaving them in a corner of the tent. Having fallen upon a fertile source of supply, their extrava- gance increases, and their tent must be enlarged, while their cast-off garments, and the refuse of their meals are scattered through it in every direction. A few days elapse, and detach- ments are sent out in various directions, with instructions to subsist on the country, and hold the outposts. No rations are furnished them, for supplies are already becoming exhausted, and the energies of the oppressed foliage are taxed to the utmost, while the almost invisible, silken footpath has grown to a broad highway, stretching like a silver ribbon up the branches, and already sending off lanes and by-roads, in various directions, one, in particular, (3f respectable proportions,- down the main trunk from the camp to the spreading lower branches, or, still further, to the flourishing growth of suckers springing up from the roots of the persecuted tree. New camps appear as if by magic in unexpected quarters, and if the approaching aid of the long-handled mop, dipped in kerosene or some other timely preparation be delayed, the crop is doomed. The naked branches, sprinkled with the ashes of departed leaf and blossom, and the ghastly standing tents of the destroying army, ragged and fluttering in the breeze, occupy the place where ruddy and golden fruit would else have gladdened the eye and pocket of the proprietor. But let him know in December the immense significance of those little varnished bulbs of eggs on the slender leafless twigs, so clearly seen against the skj^, and with his ladder and pail, or close-woven basket, he mounts SECRETARY'S REPORT. 153 the tree, and forestalls the intentions of the embryo invaders by collccthig and depositing them safely in tlie kitchen fire. Then, when his less informed or more indolent neighbors are lamenting their vanished prospects, or hurriedly snatching an ill-spared moment to endeavor to arrest the wholesale destruc- tion, he can enter calmly into the various employments of the spring, while his fresh and blooming trees all the greener and fresher by the contrast, proceed to fulfil the promises of autumn wealth. These ravenous insects pertain to a group called Bombycidce, or silkworm moths, which are generally distributed through the globe. The adult insects are frequently of the largest size, and of variegated and brilliant colors, the wings of some containing large membraneous transparent spots, devoid of scales, and presenting a singular appearance ; the species from whose cog- coons the silk of commerce has been hitherto obtained are of plainer colors, generally approaching a dirty yellowish white, and of smaller size. Experiments which have recently been made in this country, seem to prove that one or more of o^lr common native attaci are capable of producing silk of the finest texture and great strength. Dr. J. G, Morris, of Baltimore, has been very much interested in developing the capabilities of the Attacus cynthia, which feeds upon the ailantlms tree, and M. Trouvelot, of Medford, in this State, has demonstrated that the Attacus polyphemus, which feeds upon our commonest forest trees and shrubs, produces a beautiful silk in greater quantity than the original silkworm, and at far less expense to the cultivator. Our apple-tree is frequently attacked by the largest American Bombyx, the Attacus cecropia, which appears in the form of a peagreen worm, or larva, about three inches in length, orna- mented with little knobs, or warts, on the back, of blue and red. It seldom occurs in sufficient numbers to prove very injurious, but one larva devours several pounds of foliage before coming to maturity, and when discovered should receive the usual treatment of an enemy. It is rare, however, that more than one or two are found upon upon a single tree. The moth frequently measures six and a half inches from tip to tip of its expanded wings, and is-of a dusky grayish brown color, spotted and banded, with a variety of colors, the most con- 20* 154 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. spicuovis of which are dull red and white. The antennae of hoth sexes, are finely pectinated or toothed like a comb, on both sides, those of the male being very much the broadest, and resembling some beautiful fern-leaf. One of the vaporer-moths, the Org-yia leucostig-ma, which is very hurtful to the elms, horse-chestnuts and other shade trees, is occasionally found upon the apple in sufficient numbers to prove mischievous. Its larva is one of the most gaudily attired of all caterpillars, being of a bright yellow, clothed with fine, long yellow hairs upon the sides, with the head and two little warts, toward the end of the body, bright coral-red, and three spreading black plumes of long hairs, two just back of the head, and one at the other extremity. The male moth, on the other hand, is of very plain, almost quaker-like appearance ; having ashy gray wings, variegated with somewhat darker bands, and a small white spot on each fore-wing near the hinder angle, from which it derives its name ; its antennas are of a widely pectinated form, curved like a bow. The femtde is wingless, like that of the canker-worm moth, of which we shall presently speak. She deposits her eggs on the surface of her hairy cocoon, and covers them with a white, frothy matter of a water-proof char- acter, never stirring from the spot where she has lain as a chrys- alis save to provide for her future progeny and die. The empty cocoons and the eggs may be readily distinguished during the winter and should be removed and burnt. The elms on Boston Common are much infested by them, and men are regularly employed by the authorities to brush them off, and wash the bark of the trees with a mixture of clay and soap-suds. In August and September we sometimes find a whole branch stripped of its leaves by a swarm of round, yellowish larvae with darker longitudinal stripes, and black heads with a yellow collar ; if disturbed, they raise both ends of the body from the leaf or twig, clinging only by the two or three pairs of feet about the middle. These are produced by the Ewnetopona lyiinistra, a buff-colored moth, with brownish bands upon the wings, and a rich, dark brown or reddish velvety patch just back of the head ; who lays a score or more of white, rounded eggs upon the under side of a leaf in July. Attacking the leaves in the same manner and at the same time as the last, is frequently noticed a very prickly caterpillar, black, with yellow SECRETARY'S REPORT. 155 and white stripes, and with a curious hump rather forward of the middle and the head of a bright red. The thorny prickles are black and disposed in four rows, two quite regularly upon the back, and a shorter irregular one upon each side. The parent moth of which, both sexes, are winged, is of a light brownish color, the wings somewhat darker, with a gray margin. The lappct-moths, whose caterpillars are of a singular, half- round form and of a grayish color, resembling, and so closely adhering to, the bark, as to appear like a mere swelling or pro- tuberance, are sometimes guilty of preying upon the apple, but on account of their scarcity need not be much dreaded. A far more terrible and destructive enemy, not only of the apple but of almost every other tree and shrub in the localities where it has established itself, is the canker worm, Anisopteryx vernata, of Peck. It has long been known, and hundreds of remedies, more or less fallible, have been proposed and tested for its extermination. Their failure may be attributed in most cases to the want of a thorough acquaintance with, or a neglect of taking advantage of the habits of the insect. As the period during which the wingless female emerges from the ground and ascends the trees to meet the winged male, and deposit her eggs, extends from the last of September, through the mild ■ndays of winter and the month of March, it is evident that impassable barriers must be kept up during the whole of this time to make the remedy effectual. And as the young larvae, when hatched from the egg, are of totally different form and structure from their parents, the same obstacles will not avail to prevent their ascending the trees and commencing their work of devastation. Accordingly before the first of May the trunks of such trees as have been effectually protected by troughs of oil, collars of tin, or belts of tar, must be thoroughly soaped or washed with the soap or oil from the point occupied by the pro- tector to the ground, to destroy the eggs which have been laid on that portion, the clusters of eggs upon the fences and build- ings in the vicinity removed and burned, and all shrubs or unprotected trees carefully examined or treated with the prepar- ations before recommended. The children can be readily taught to discover and remove the eggs in their leisure hours, and will take a hearty interest in this sanitary measure, espec- ially if a small sum, by way of reward, be offered for an ounca 156 • BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. or a pint of the eggs. They are laid in clusters, and a thin- bladed knife, removing also a chip of the bark or wood to which they are glued, will be found the most convenient instrument for the purpose of separation. It should be distinctly impressed on the minds of the children that the eggs must be sought for on all woody shrubs and trees, as well as on all perpendicular objects, such as fences and buildings, and that if any are dropped or spilled on the ground in the process of removal, they should be collected with the others in pails, boxes or tight bags, and burned. A single season's trial faithfully carried out will con- vince any one of the efficacy of this somewhat tedious, but simple remedy. As the canker worm, fortunately, spreads but slowly through the country, many of those present have not had actual experience of their ravages or even seen the insect itself. The male moth has light gray silky wings expanding about one inch and a quarter, the front pair darkest, and banded with blackish and white zigzag lines. The female, as has been stated, is wingless, with very slender feet and antennse, of a li^it gray color beneath, and darker above, about a third of an inch or more in length. The larvae, or worms as they are vul- garly called, vary much in color. The young are of a dusky hue above, striped with yellow on each side, and whitish beneath. When fully grown, according to Harris, some arcjt " ash colored on the back, and black on the sides, below which is the pale yellowish line. Others of a dull, gi-eenish yellow, and others of a clay color, with slender, interrupted blackish lines on the sides and small spots of the same color on the back. Some are green, with two white stripes down the back. The head and feet partake of the general color of the body. They are about an inch in length, and move by drawing the hinder part of the body toward the head, thus forming a loop. The insects which have this habit are called Geometers, measurers, or span-worms, and are a numerous group of great destructive powers. The cheapest, and perhaps most convenient applications to prevent the moths from ascending the trees, are strips of paper or cloth covered with tar, or what is better, melted Indian rubber, daubed on with a brush, and tied about the trunk three or four feet from the gi'ound. These applications must be kept soft and sticky, for if a pellicle or skin forms on the surface, they will prove no obstacle. Several contrivances have been SECRETAEY'S REPORT. 157 invented, more or less expensive and ingenious, to effect the same end, such as troughs filled with oil or salt water, conical collars of metal, &c. I have lately examined a very neat, and apparently effectual collar, composed of glass of the form of an inverted gutter, and attached to the tree by an iron hoop and tent of cloth, the im'ention of Mr. Benjamin Merritt, Jr. This will, no doubt, prove very valuable, as it opposes a practically impassable barrier to the female moth, if the expense does not prevent its introduction. If we are successful by any of these appliances in preventing the ascent of the mother, we must, as previously stated, remove the eggs outside this cordon, before the first of May, or all our labor and expense may prove in vain. Notwithstanding our patient care and perseverance has pre- served the tree thus far, we are still liable to the depredations of certain little creatures which attack the fruit. A moth, nearly related to the destroyers of our furs and car- pets, deposits her eggs in the calyx or blossom end of the young apple, about the end of June. The eggs in a few days give birth to small, white caterpillars, with blackish heads, which burrow into the core and open a hole on the side, through which they eject theii castings. This injury causes the fruit in about three weeks to become prematurely ripe and fall to the ground, soon after which the grubs leave it and make their cocoons in crevices in the bark. The first record we have of its depredations in this country, is by Mr. Joseph Tufts, of Charles- town, who discovered it in a St. Michael pear. It has since proved very destructive also to cranberries. The moth is described by Mr. Tufts as having the upper wings of a light slate color, crossed by wavy bands of a darker shade, towards the tips of each, an oval spot of a burnished coppery lustre will be seen, the feet, antennae, and body beneath, are of a light gray ; it expands about three-quarters of an inch. The thorough rubbing of the trees with soap or the scraping and brushing off the rough bark in the late fall or early spring, will be found very serviceable in ridding ourselves of this insect ; but the collecting daily of all worm-eaten windfalls, boiling them, and feeding to the cattle or swine has proved most effectual. A small, white, tapering, polished maggot is v5ry destructive to some varieties of the apple. I have found it most abundant in 158 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. the Porter, and not uncommon in several other kinds when ripe, especially those of thin skins. It is the young of a dipterous insect, or two-winged fly, belonging to the same order as the pernicious Hessian fly and wheat-midge. Dr. Fitch has described this insect under the name of Molohrns mail, or the apple-midge. • The adult is little more than an eighth of an inch in length, almost black above, yellowish beneath, with hyaline, smoky wings. They are supposed to attack only those apples which have been previously penetrated by the last mentioned insect, the coreworin, so that the same remedies will be applicable to both cases. Within a few years it has been noticed that the common plum- weevil or curculio has extended its depredations to the apple, and several other fruits, as well as to that from which it derives its common name. The perfect insect is well known to the majority of horticulturists as a dark brown or blackish beetle, with long snout, about a fifth of an inch long, and simulating death when disturbed, folding its feet and beak beneath the body and presenting the appearance of a bud. The larva is a small, whitish, footless grub, which bores into the interior of the fruit, producing the same effect as that of the coreworm. The reme- dies hitherto proposed, have been to syringe the fruit with whitewash, strong soapy water, or other offensive preparations ; to collect and treat the fallen fruit as recommended for the core- worm^ to jar them frequently from the trees, turning in the swine and poultry at the same time, &c. If, as Dr. Fitch sug- gests, however, the larvee live during the winter, beneath the outer bark of the smaller limbs, their presence may be easily detected by the crescent-shaped marks on the outside, and the spring brood annihilated by burning the limbs or thoroughly ru})bing them with soap. I have mentioned already only a part of the insects which infest our fruit-trees, and have endeavored to give some idea of the great variety of habits, among the number of voracious crea- tures, for the support of which the farmer and gardener are annually taxed. But as my space is limited, I will proceed to recapitulate a few of the best methods of destroying these pests, or preventing their ravages by rendering their food unpalatable. Firstly, we shoifld make ourselves acquainted with the partic- ular species, and the time and manner of their transformations, SECRETARY'S REPORT. 159 (by actual experience if possible,) in order to take them in the weakest and most accessible condition. Then, if caterpillars attacking trees, remove and burn the eggs, or thoroughly soap the trees to prevent their being laid, kill them if already laid, or hang bottles of sweetened water about the trees to entrap and destroy the perfect moth. If borers in the trunk or branches, soap the bark, (soft-soap made cold is, perhaps, the best preparation, and if mingled with a strong decoction of tobacco it will not be less effective.) Dig out the borers with knife or gouge, or pour boiling water, or petroleum, into their holes, making sure that it reaches the insect. If insects on the leaves or fruit, syringe the trees wdth any of the preparations previously recommended, soap-suds, tobacco- water, &c. Jar them frequently, giving the pigs and poultry a chance to pick up and devour those which fall. Hang pieces of cloth or paper dipped in kerosene, in the branches, renewing them every few days. For insects upon roots and bulbs, sprinkle petroleum along the row«, or water them with strong soap-suds ; for onions, mingle common soot, or pyroligneous acid with the solution. For squash and cucumber vines, (fee, scatter paper-rags, saw- dust, or other absorbent materials, soaked in kerosene, about the hills, sprinkle the leaves with road dust, air-slacked lime, ashes, or powdered herbs known to be offensive to the insects. The Persian insect-powder, which has proved quite useful of late years, is composed of the pulverized leaves and blossoms of a species of fever-few, the Pyrethrum carneum, closely allied to the common camomile. It would be really worthy of experi- ment to collect, dry and powder the flowers of our common ox- * eye daisy, or white weed, so common through the country, and ascertain the effect upon insects and slugs which attack our broad-leaved plants, as well as upon the moths which infest furs and woollen cloths. Chloride of lime, freely scattered upon the ground among growing vegetables, gives off a gas which is extremely noxious to most insects, without injuring the plants. Coal tar is also quite serviceable in some cases. For field crops, the most feasible plan is, by rotation, to starve out the destructive millions that prey upon one variety, devoting X60 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. the land to some other crop for two seasons before returning to the original one. Small fields of wheat, rye or oats may some- times be saved from immediate injury by building a line of fires on the windward side, and burning scraps of leather, wet straw? and such substances as emit a thick, offensive smoke. Two persons, on opposite sides, with a cord reaching across the field, have swept off and destroyed some insects by drawing the tightened cord across the heads of the grain. It is highly necessary to bear in mind the importance of faith- ful and concerted action in experimenting upon the destroyers of our crops, as the labor and expense bestowed by one farmer in ridding his land of these pests will avail but little if his neighbors do not second his exertions. We must ourselves try various remedies, and thoroughly test even those backed by the best authorities, before discarding them as too expensive or laborious. But one fact is indisputable, namely, that the birds are our friends. Let them take a few of our early fruits, or devour a part of our grain, they restore it a hundred fold. Yqtj few of us, perhaps, have not already learned this, but those that still persist in destroying and driving the birds from their premises, will eventually acquire this knowledge in the dear school of experience. Moles, toads, and snakes, are all feeders upon insects, and never claim any part or reward in the vegetable productions of the farm. In conclusion, I would say, that, although the insects men- tioned in the foregoing remarks are not a tenth part of the enemies of our crops, I have endeavored to select, as far as possible, representative cases to illustrate the transformations and ravages of the class. To all who may wish to pursue this ' subject further, I shall be happy to afford any information in my power, by identifying specimens or otherwise. Communica- tions may be addressed to me at the State Cabinet, Boston, and specimens preserved in vials of alcohol, or pinned in boxes, will be very acceptable to the instructive collection I am engaged in preparing. SHEEP-HUSBANDRY. The subject of sheep-husbandry was then announced for discussion. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 161 Mr. Perkins. — I am not prepared with any definite remarks on this subject. In relation to the breeding of pure blood sheep, I shall leave that mostly to those who have had greater experience. It is not possible, probably, for us all to breed pure blood sheep, at pure blood prices ; because those who con- sume mutton must have mutton to eat, and they cannot afford to pay Vermont prices for Merino sheep to put on the table. They do everything up in Vermont but eat sheep. They do not eat full-blooded Merino sheep, when they can sell them for from $50 to check or stop the ravages of this very destructive insect, none of whicli appear to be entirely successful. The common caterpillar can be kept under by constant vigi- lance. The best and easiest way of destroying a large portion of them is by picking off the eggs, which can now easily be found on the small twigs, and burning them. Whatever is missed should be exterminated immediately after hatching, as then it is much less trouble than it would be if they had attained their full size. These, although they are not the only insects which attack the foliage, yet they are the ones that cause the most trouble and destruction to the crop ; and these insects, together with the borer, which can be more easily managed, are now the prin- cipal drawbacks which the orchardist has to contend with, which, with the increased price of l^yid near large cities, renders it doubtful if it would be profitable to plant out apple-orchards in their immediate vicinities, or where land suitable for orcharding is worth one hundred and fifty dollars per acre, — land of that value and in such locations paying better with some other crop. And the fact that owners of apple-orchards near Boston, the trees of which are now just in their prime, are having them dug up, and the ground cleared entirely of trees, for the purpose of growing some other crop on the land rather than apples, goes to prove that it is either unprofitable to raise apples, or more profitable to grow some other crop on land so valuable. And therefore we cannot arrive at any other conclusion than this: that the apple cannot be cultivated in the immediate vicinity SECRETARY'S REPORT. 223 of our large cities, where the land upon which the orchard is grown is worth one hundred and fifty dollars or more an acre, profitably, but that it may be extended, with a reason a) )le pros- pect of paying, at some little distance from such places, if the owner is willing to give good cultivation, and to look sharp after the insects. And although the location may be more than fifty miles from market, it should not prevent the owner from planting trees, but should rather encourage him to do it, for these reasons : first, there are less insects ; second, if near a railroad, the expense of transportation will not be much, if any, more than it would by horse-power, ten or fifteen miles, which is the usual method of delivery near cities ; and then, perhaps, it is a crop that will pay as well as any that distance from market, and can be transported as easily and safely as any other. We often hear the remark that our orchards are fast going to decay. That is true in one sense, for after trees have borne their crops for many years, and have passed their maturity, and in their old age have lost their vigor and fruitfulness, they, like all other products with which this earth is stocked, either animal or vegetable, must travel that same down-hill road to decay ; and we can hurry them along in that path by neglect, both in cultivation and in the destruction of insects, or we can extend their usefulness by an opposite course. Which method we shall pursue is a question every orchardist must answer for himself. The habit of deep ploughing in orchards, we think, is detri- mental both to the longevity and health of the trees. Suppose there are not more than eight or ten inches in depth of soil in an orchard, (and that is as deep as the soil of most of our orchards,) and after planting the trees the ground is annually ploughed eight or ten inches deep. Of course all roots of the trees will be destroyed as deep as the plough goes, and whatever roots are left to the trees are in the hard and cold subsoil, driven there against these repeated attempts to get into a more congenial and nutritive soil, and contrary to the nature of the tree, which, if left to its own instincts, will always spread its roots near or within a few inches of the surface of the ground. ■ Will not deep ploughing, then, by forcing the roots of the tree into a hard, wet, cold, and unnatural subsoil, produce dis- ease and decay ? We think it will. And as cultivation and 224 BOARD OP AGRICULTURE. stirring of the soil are necessary, let the orchard be ploughed shallow, or mulched with leaves or cheap hay. On almost every farm there are more or less acres of rough, rocky land, unfavorable to the production of the various hoed crops, or for mowing fields. This land is often the most suitable for the apple-orchard, and should be appropriated for that pur- pose, rather than the smooth and more level lands of the farm, which are better adapted to the other crops. Should not there be some moral or legal means applied to prevent the extension, and to cause the destruction, of the com- mon caterpillar ? The legislature of this State, by the sugges- tion of the Board of Agriculture, very properly made a law causing all dogs to be licensed, and all damage to sheep killed by dogs to be paid for out of the fund accumulated from the fees for the licenses. That is right. If a person has twenty-five dollars' worth of sheep suddenly converted into mutton and dog-meat by his neighbors' dogs, he gets his pay for it ; but if he has a valuable orchard, in which he has spent time and money to have all the caterpillars destroyed, and his lazy or shiftless neighbor has an orchard near, the trees of which are covered with caterpillars' nests, and by not being destroyed are allowed to attain their perfect organization, and to fly over and deposit their eggs on his trees, and thus do him a damage, by causing him a large amount of extra work the next year to exterminate them, he has no dog fund to go to, and gets nothing for it. Should it be so ? We think not. Every per- son's duty to his neighbors and to the public requires him at least to extirpate, as far as he can, the insects on his own trees ; and the future condition of the apple-crop, if the ravages of the insects are not diminished in some way, must be seriously Injured, both in quantity and quality. The cultivation of the pear increases quite rapidly, particu- larly in the gardens near our large towns ; and this fruit? although much more plenty than a few years ago, still com- mands a fair and remunerating price in our principal markets, and they are not glutted with this fruit, as many have heretofore thought they would be ; and there are now almost as many bushels sent to market as there were single pears twenty years ago. And it indicates that the consumption of this delicious SECRETARY'S REPORT. 225 fruit is not now confined to the few, but that it is becoming general and extensive throughout the community. The peach and cherry seem to be fast leaving us, the former from that insidious disease, the yellows ; the latter, either from some injury to the trees from the winter, or from the ravages of the black aphis, or from both, is fast going to destruction. There does not appear to be any certain or efficient, remedies for the complaints of either the peach or the cherry. The extinction of either one would be quite a loss ; and we hope that some remedy may be found that will save them, as wo now have so few varieties that we cannot even afford to lose one of them. The Report was accepted. Mr. Perkins moved to abolish the requirement of the Board that grain and root crops should be weighed by competitors for premiums offered by the county fairs. ■ The motion was specially assigned for Saturday, the 28th. Saturday, Jan. 28th. The Board met on Saturday according to adjournment. The subject first under discussion was the motion of Mr. Perkins, of the Berkshire Society, to discontinue the requirements on the part of the Board, whereby the societies are compelled to cause crops entered for premiums to be accurately weighed or measured. Tlie chief reason urged for the repeal of the requirement was that it was a source of inconvenience and expense, and that the result was, after all, unsatisfactory. Mr. Moore, of the Middlesex Society produced a copy of the reports of the Berkshire Society, as returned to the Board, printed only in a newspaper form, and showed that they could be of little use to the State. No detailed statements appeared as to how crops were raised, no estimate, even, of the expenses, no reliable data, which could serve for the instruction of farmers in other parts of the Commonwealth, or even in the immediate vicinity where they were grown. Such returns were not what the State had a right to expect. They could add nothing exact and valuable to our stock of knowledge on the subject. They could serve uo good purpose. 29* 226 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. Dr. LoRiNG, of the Essex Society, said, as a member of the committee which prepared the blanks to be used by the societies, that the Board had tried to make the requirements as practi- cable and as little burdensome as was consistent with the idea of getting some value in return for the money which the State was paying for the advancement of its agriculture. He proposed some modifications in the blank which would meet any reason- able objections which could be made to the present requirements. Mr. Taft, of the Worcester South-East Society, advocated the amendments, and said, in reply to the assertion' of Mr. Perkins, that farmers would often deceive the committee, and swear to statements which were not true ; that, as a general rule, farmers were an honest class of men, and that if cases of deception and perjury had occurred in Berkshire, or any other county, the individuals by whom it is practised should be forever after debarred from competing for premiums. Messrs. Garfield, of the Housatonic Society, Grout, of the Middlesex South, Lathrop, of Hadley, and Tidd, of the "Worcester West Society participated in the debate, till it was Voted, to refer the subject to a committee consisting of Messrs. Perkins and Garfield, to prepare such a schedule of require- ments as should, in their judgment, facilitate the action of societies, and at the same time secure the object of the State in offering its bounties, by eliciting accurate, trustworthy and exact information in regard to the crops entered for premium, and to report the sariie for the consideration of the Board. This committee reported subsequently, but as the course suggested was not thought to be calculated to secure the desired end, it was not adopted. The question- then recurred on Dr. Boring's amendments to the blank to be furnished by the societies to competitors for premiums. Prof. Agassiz said there ought to be a more general under-, standing as to the object of awarding premiums, that is, as to whether they are designed simply to reward farmers for improve- ments that may have been made, mere rewards of merit, in other words, or to gather some facts and data of value to agriculture. The latter ought to be the aim of the State, and if it is, we cannot be too exacting and minute. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 227 After some further discussion the amendments were adopted, and the form completed as follows : Agricultural Society. Statement concerning a crop of Raised by Mr. In the town of 1865. "What was the crop of 18G3 ? What manure was used, and how much ? "What was the crop of 1864 ? "What manure was used, and how much ? What is the nature of the soil ? When, and how many times ploughed, and how deep ? What other preparation for the seed ? Cost of ploughing and other preparation ? Amount of manure, in loads of thirty bushels, and how applied ? Value of manure upon the- ground ? When, and how planted, and the amount and kind of seed ? _ Cost of seed and planting ? How cultivated, and how many times ? Cost of cultivation, including weeding and thinning ? Time and manner of harvestinjr ? o Cost of harvesting, including the storing and husking or threshing ? Amount of straw, stover, or other product ? REMARKS. Signed by Competitor. From actual measurement, I hereby certify that the land which the above crop of covered, contained rods, and no more. Acting Surveyor. * hereby certify that appointed for that purpose by the Committee on crop, appeared before me, and took oath that be has ascertained the weight of the above crop, according to the regula- tions of the State Board of Agriculture, on the day of and that it was pounds. Justice of the Peace. In ascertaining the amount of crop, any vessel may be -used, and the weight of its contents once, multiplied by the number of times it is filled by tlie crop. The certificate shall state the weight of all crops only in a merchantable state. In measuring the land, any competent person may be employed, whether a sworn surveyor or not. 228 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. In ascertaining the amount of a hay crop, entered for premium, the meas- urement of the hay in the barn may be employed. The Committee with whom' crops are entered for premium, may, at their option, select such entries as are in their judgment entitled to the application of the above regulations. Rules of Measv/re, practised and adopted hy the State Board of Agriculture. Wheat, Potatoes, Sugar Beets, Mangel Wurzel, Ruta- Bagas, "White Beans, and Pease, . . . .60 lbs. to the bushel. Corn, Rye, 66 " " Oats, 32 " " Barley, Buckwheat, 48 " " Cracked Corn, Corn and Rye and other meal, except Oat, and English Turnips, 50 " " Parsnips, 45 " " Carrots, 55 •' " Onions, 52 (( (< Dr. Hartwell, of Southbridge, then presented a paper upon ADiPOCERE, as follows : ADIPOCERE. A soft, unctuous substance, of a light brown color, into which the muscular fibres of dead bodies are converted, by long immersion in water or spirits, or, by being buried in moist places under peculiar circumstances. This substance was first discovered by Fourcroy, in the bury- ing-ground in the Church des Inouns, in Paris, in 1787, when it was removed, among the masses of the bodies of the poor there interred together. In this place, about fifteen hundred bodies were thrown together into the same pit, and being decomposed, were con- verted into this substance. When this substance is subjected to chemical analysis, a true ammoniacal soap is first yielded, composed of ammonia, or concrete oil and water. My attention was first called to this substance in the summer of 1861. One of my farm laborers was scraping the ground in my livery barn cellar, when he uncovered a white substance, which, upon examination, I found to be adipocere. It was the remains of a hog which had been buried there many years. The present tenant had occupied the barn for over ten years, but had no knowledge of the burial of the animal. It might have been there thirty years. It must have been there over ten years. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 229 The bones of this hog were in a perfect state of preservation, the hair also was not changed. The quantity of adipocere was quite large, showing that the whole soft parts of the body had been converted into this substance. The color of this substance was a perfect white. The yellow tinge is produced by exposure to the air and light. The specimen which I show you is from one of two cows which belonged to my neighbor, and were killed by eating green clover in August, 1863. I permitted him to bury them in my horse-manure heap, upon my farm, where they have laid to this 6th of December, 1864. The part of the animal which was changed to adipocere was in contact with the ground in a kind of pit, deeply covered with compact manure, which excluded the air, and was constantly charged with water. The carcase of a horse was buried in the same heap of manure in April, 1864, in a higher and drier part of the heap. Nothing remained to be seen of this animal except the bones, hoofs, and hair, all the other parts had been incorporated with the manure. The time required for the decomposition of animal matter in a warm horse-manure heap, cannot be many days. No offensive gaseous exhalations, where the covering is two feet, can be discovered. My principal object in this communication is to call the attention of farmers to the best and most profitable way of dis- posing of domestic animal bodies, which die of disease or accident. Almost every country town has its veterinary cemetery, usually selected in some loose, sandy, or gravelly soil, in con- sequence of its easy excavation. This porous sand will not absorb and retain the gases; hence there are frequent com- plaints to the selectmen of the town, who are believed to possess legal and sanitary powers sufficient to correct all mis- demeanors which may offend the body politic. The difficulty then is to find the man whose olfactories can endure the stench. The nuisance is usually suffered to exhaust itself while the case is under adjudication. 230 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. I once permitted my neighbor to bury his dead horse in my farm gravel-pit. The consequence was that my laborers left the field by reason of the offensive odor from the equine remains. I complained to my friend that he did not cover the dead horse deep enough. He promised me faithfully that the evil should be corrected. But the difficulty was that he could not find a man to do the sepulchral service. In a few days, the evil, like many diseases by nature's recuperative powers cured itself, and my farming was progressing again in its usual monotonous way. Now, to save all this trouble and expense, and use these carcases of dead animals to profit, you have only to put them in your dung heap. If you have not a manure heap, just lay the dead animal upon your pasture, and over it dump one or two cords of manure, and your obsequies are scientifically performed. This manure will absorb all the elementary substances ema- nating from decomposition of the animal remains. How much this animal matter will add in nitrogen to the value of the manure, I am not, from chemical experiments, able at this time to inform you. Some of the manure which I am putting upon my farm is impregnated with this animal matter. I am making arrangements to analyze this manure according to the best farming method. In making the chemical analysis, I lay the works of Sir Humphrey Davy, Dr. Dana, Liebig and Boussingault, upon the shelf, and proceed with my experiments in the most practical way. I shall not be able to give the equivalents of oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, and carbon contained in this manure. My scientific analysis will consist in staking off a given number of rods of land upon which this manure has been applied, and then staking off an equal number of rods upon which an equal quantity of the same kind of manure not thus impregnated with animal matter will be applied. Both lots of land are to be planted with Indian corn. This Indian corn, in the language of chemistry, is to be my re-agent. . My test is to be the sealed half bushel measure ; the difference in productiveness of the lots is to be noted as the Jinale. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 231 Voted, that the thanks of' the Board be presented to Dr. Hartwcll, and that the paper be published in the Report. Monday, Jan. 30th. The subject under consideration on Monday, January 30th, was the Agricultural College. This subject was introduced by the report of the committee to which certain resolutions oifcred at the public meeting at Greenfield had been referred. After a very full and free expression of opinion on the part of the members from all parts of the State, the following preamble and resolutions were adopted as the sense of the Board : Whereas, it appears by the message of his excellency, the governor, and by the report of the trustees of the Agricultural College, that that institution has been located in the town of Amherst, strictly in accordance with the provisions of the law, in that case made and provided, and that a farm has been pur- chased, which, with its surroundings, is, in the judgment of the trustees, eminently fitted for the purposes of the institution, and deeds of warranty taken in the name of the corporation, Therefore Resolved, That no action by the Board of Agriculture, on the subject of location, is necessary or desirable. Resolved, That the Agricultural College should maintain an intimate relation to the agricultural societies and the farmers of the Commonwealth,- as a means of disseminating practical infor- mation and affording the best means of educating young men for the business of farming. Resolved, That for this purpose every effort should be made to connect the State Board of Agriculture, in some way, with the government of the college, for the express object of bringing the agricultural societies into close connection with that institu- tion ; and as the most useful method of combining all the efforts of the Commonwealth in one system of practical agricultural education. Tuesday, Jan. 31st. On Tuesday, the Board, by special invitation of Professor Agassiz, held its meeting at the Museum of Comparative Zoology, at Cambridge. The origin and objects of the institution were 232 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. explained by the Professor and his assistants. After some hours devoted to viewing the magnificent collections of natural history and the working facilities which the Museum affords, the Board, by invitation of the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agri- culture, visited the Bussey Farm, at West Roxbury, to examine the Norman horses, imported by that society, during the last year, from France. Respecting the history and characteristics of the horses, Mr. Saltonstall, on behalf the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture, presented the following statement. THE PERCHERON HORSE. The trustees of the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture, feeling that a great want of the farmers exists in the matter of a proper horse for agricultural purposes, — a horse uniting the qualities of great strength with reasonable speed, — after husbanding their means for several years, have imported two noble stallions and three fine mares, of the famous Per- cheron breed. This horse, undoubtedly, is the best representa- tive of a true agricultural horse in the world. And the horses of the society are splendid types of their breed. Herbert says,* " Le Perche is a district of that portion of France which was formerly known as Normandy, in which the breed of the Norman horses has been most highly cultivated, and exists in its most perfect form and improved condition. The remarkable purity of the race is attested by the certainty with which the stallions transmit to their progeny, begotten on mares of a different race, their own characteristics, and the high degree in which the offspring of tbe mares, bred to horses of superior class, retain the better qualities of their dams." The Percheron horse is a cross of the old Norman war-horse, of the iron-clad chivalry of the Middle Ages, — of William the Conqueror and Richard Cceur de Lion, — with the light Andalu- sian horse, which in its highest form was a pure barb of Morocco imported into Spain by the Saracen Moors. " The bone and muscle, and much of the form of the Per- cheron come from the old Norman war-horse ; and he gets his spirit and action from the Andalusian. Docility comes from • Hints to Horse Keepers. Chapter 6. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 233 both sides. On the expulsion of the Spaniards from the Northern Provinces, the supply of Arabian stallions was cut off, and, since that time, in the Perche district of Normandy, their progeny has, doubtless, been bred in-and-in ; hence the remark- able uniformity of the breed, and their disposition to impart their form to their progeny, beyond any breed, of domestic animals within my knowledge. Another circumstance, which, I think, has tended to perpetuate the good qualities of these liorses, is the fact of their males being kept entire ; a gelding is, I believe, unknown among the rural horses of France. The farmer will thus breed from the best horse, and he will have an opportunity of judging, because he has been broken to harness and his qualities known before he could command business as a stallion." The points of the peculiar breed known as the Percheron- Normans are these : Their standard is probably from fifteen to sixteen and a half hands. " They are very short in the saddle place, and comparatively long below ; they are well ribbed up and round-barreled ; they have not the heavy head and extremely short, thick neck of the old Norman horse ; l3ut, on the contrary, have the head short, with the genuine Arabian breadth of brow and hollow of the profile between the eyes and nostrils ; nor are the heads thicker, especially at the setting-on place, nor the necks, which are well arched and sufficiently long, heavier or more massive than corresponds well with the general stoutness of their frame. Their legs are particularly short from the knees and hocks downward ; nor, though heavily haired, have they such shaggy fetlocks and feet as the larger Normans, while they have the unyielding, iron-like muscles and feet, apparently unconscious of disease, for which the latter race are famous." Herbert concludes his chapter on the Norman horse by quoting from a writer in the " British Quarterly Journal of Agriculture : " " The horses of Normandy are a capital race for hard work and scanty fare. I have never seen such horses at the collar, under the diligence, the post-carriage, the cumbrous and heavy boiture or cabriolet for one or two horses, or the farm- cart. They are enduring and energetic beyond description ; with their necks cut to the bone, they flinch not ; they keep their condition where other horses would die of neglect and 30* 234 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. hard treatment. A better cross' for some of our horses cannot be imagined than those of Normandy, provided they have not the ordinary faihng of too much length from the hock down- ward, and a heavy head." "These two points last named," (Herbert goes on to say,) " are precisely those which are entirely got rid of in the best style of Percheron-Normans, which are, as has been stated, those of the Normans most thoroughly imbued with the Arabian, or, to speak more correctly, Barb blood of Andalusia." Such, then, are the horses imported by the trustees of the Massachusetts Society, with the hope that the farmers of Massa- chusetts will avail themselves of the opportunity offered them of crossing their best mares with this renowned stock, and thus obtain an animal uniting more of the qualities essential to them in their agricultural pursuits than can be now found in any State in the Union — a horse which will probably more nearly resemble the Morgan in his best days than now exists. "Wednesday, Feb. 1. The Board met at 10 o'clock according to adjournment. Present, Messrs. Adams, Agassiz, Bull, Clement, Garfield, Grout, Homer, Hubbard, Huntington, Johnson, Keith, Ken- rick, Loring, Moore, Perkins, Saltonstall, Matthew Smith, J. M. Smith, Stedman, Stockbridge, Thompson and Tidd. Mr. Grout in the Chair. Messrs. Tidd, Stockbridge and Adams, having been appointed a committee on credentials of new members, reported that the following members were duly elected, viz. : * Leverett Saltonstall, of Newton, by the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture. Asa Clement, of Dracut, by the Middlesex North. Newton S. Hubbard, of Brimfield, by the Worcester South. Velorous Taft, of Upton, by the Worcester South-East. Levi Stockbridge, of Hadley, by the Hampshire. John M. Smith, of Sunderland, by the Franklin. John Kenrick, of Orleans, by the Barnstable. Daniel A. Cleaveland, by the Martha's Vineyard Society. On motion of Mr. Huntington it was SECRETARY'S REPORT. 235 Resolved. That the Board of Agriculture petition the legis- lature for such alteration of the 4th section chapter 66 of the General Statutes. relating to Fairs, as shall enable the several original county societies to award premiums without reference to other societies that have been formed witliin their limits. The Board then proceeded to assign the delegates to visit and report upon the Exhibitions of the county agricultural societies for the year, as follows : To the Essex, Middlesex, at Concord, . Middlesex North, at Lowell, . . Middlesex South, at Framingham, Worcester, at "Worcester, "Worcester "West, at Barre, . . "Worcester North, at Fitchburg, . "Worcester South, at Sturbridge, . "Worcester South-East, at Milford, Hamp., Franklin and Hampden, at Northampton. Highland, at Middlefield, Hampsliire, at Amherst, Hampden, at Springfield, Hampden East, at Palmer, Franklin, at Greenfield, Berkshire, at Pittsfield, Hoosac "Valley, at North Adams, Housatonic, at Great Barrington, Norfolk, at Dedham, Bristol, at Taunton, Plymouth, at Bridgewater, Barnstable, at Barnstable, Nantucket, at Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, at West Tisbury, Asa Clement. T. G. Huntington. Charles O. Perkins. Abel F. Adams. Matthew Smith. Louis Agassiz. N. S. Hubbard. J. M. Smith. John Kenrick. James Thompson. HOLLIS TiDD. Leverett Saltonstall. E. W. Bull. George B. Loring. Elias Grout. Levi Stockbridge. Henry R. Keith. Phineas Stedman. Sylvander Johnson. Velorous Taft. Daniel A. Cleaveland. Harrison Garfield. John B. Moore, Alured Houer. Thursday, Feb. 2. ■ The Board met according to adjournment, when Mr. Tidd was requested to preside. The first business in order was the consideration of the report of the committee on a list of subjects submitted by Mr. Bull, chairman, when the following committees were appointed : On Cranberries. — Messrs. Kenrick, Davis, and Thompson. The Grass Crop. — Messrs. Stockbridge, J. M. Smith, and Homer. Grape Culture. — Messrs. Bull, Clement and Moore. 236 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. TIlb Dairy. — Messrs. Keith, Tidd, Huntington, and Hubbard. Fruit Culture. — Messrs. Thompson, Clement, and Bull. Farm Fences. — Messrs. Grout, Adams, and Johnson. Making and Application of Manures. — Messrs. Perkins, Sted- man, and Homer. Farm Accounts. — Messrs. Garfield, Stedman, and Perkins. Fecundation, Gestation, and Parturition of Domestic Animals. — Messrs. Agassiz, Loring, and Matthew Smith. Farming as an Occupation. — Messrs. Moore, Huntington, and Adams. Management of Woodlands and Forest Trees. — Messrs. Clem- ent, Taft, and Kenrick. Sheep Husbandry. — Messrs. Loring, Keith, and Matthew Smith. Adaptation of Crops to Soils, ^c. — Messrs. Stedman, J. M. Smith, and Grout. Raising and Preservation of Seeds. — Messrs. Huntington, Stedman, and Hubbard. Drainage. — Messrs. Saltonstall, Perkins, and Clement. Committee on Meetings. — Messrs. Loring, Agassiz, and Keith. Voted, To appoint a committee of three to take action upon the resolutions relating to the agricultural college — Messrs. Loring, Bull, and Perkins. It was voted, that the public meeting for lectures and discussions be held at Worcester, on Tuesday, the 12th of December. Adjourned. In accordance with a vote of the Board, the following was presented as the Report of the Committee on GRAPE CULTURE. BY E. W. BULL. The past season has been peculiarly favorable to the grape, and many of the tender and uncertain varieties have been ripened much better than usual. These circumstances are likely to add to the interest now so largely felt by the public in grape culture, and to quicken the purpose which many enter- tain of planting vineyards ; your committee propose, therefore, to notice the, in their judgment, best methods of planting, and the necessity of certain precautions to secure success. Perhaps SECRETARY'S REPORT. 237 notliing has so much prevented tlic planting of vineyards as tlie belief in trenching, and other costly modes of culture, derived from the practice of vine-growers in other countries, and the teaching of the books on which we have too much relied in the absence of experience of our own. We believe that trenching is not only unnecessary — except, perhaps, for the purpose of draining wet lands — but really injurious to the vine, the roots of which are thus invited into the cold subsoil, which, in our short seasons does not get warm enough to promote the healthy development of the vine, which grows late, and is thus surprised by the winter with unripened wood, which yields imperfect and unripened buds, to give imperfect and late fruit the ensuing season, if, indeed, it does not die outright. Trenching, in hot countries, saves the vine from the effects of the severe droughts which prevail during their long and hot summers, and is, in such localities, indispensable to success ; but the fact that trenching varies according to the climate^ being, in France, about twenty inches, in Spain, about thirty inches, and in Italy four and sometimes five feet, shows that we must adapt our culture to the conditions of climate, and our experience leads us to the conclusion that twelve inches is quite enough. One other difficulty lies in the way of tlie cultivation of the grape — in the the large way, — and that is the almost universal belief that protection is necessary to carry the vines, — even those called hardy, safely through the winter. Your Committee have, in former reports, invited attention to the misuse of this term, which should only be applied to such grapes as are absolutely hardy — loitliout protection — under all ordinary circumstances. It is quite common among grape- growers to call any grape hardy which can be made to survive the winter with aid of protection, but we believe that the term applies properly only to those, which, like the apple, pear, &£., survive all winters without protection, except unusually severe and exceptional ones, against which no experience can shield you. "We have such grapes, and it is the part of wisdom, at least on the part of the novice, to begin with such as have been proved to be adapted to field culture without protection. 238 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. THE SOIL which is host adapted for a vineyard, is light and warm, such as would carry a firstrate crop of corn. It should not be so level ' that water would stand about the roots in winter, and it should be in good heart, but not excessively rich. Indian corn is a good preparatory crop, insuring clean tillage and destruction of all weeds and grass. If, however, the soil be stiff and inclined to clay, and if it be dry, with a slope toward the sun, it may be made to carry grapes by adding to it liberal dressings of vegetable mould, with ashes, plaster, and bone-dust. Such soil should be ploughed very deep to insure good drainage and permeability to warm rains and to the tender roots of the plants. It will, however, never be so good for the grape as the warm loam which we recommend above. Wet, spongy, and cold soils are wholly unfit for the grape, and can only be improved by deep trenching and thorough draining with tiles or stone ; but be careful, in such cases, to leave the manure near the surface that the roots may thus be kept within the influence of the summer heat, so that the wood will be well ripened, and the buds made into fruit-buds for the next year's crop. With all these precautions, however, such soil will not give you grapes of the finest quality, unless, indeed, the situation is especially favorable. PLANTING THE GRAPE. Having ploughed the field as deep as possible, say from nine to twelve inches, carry on about forty loads of compost, made of peat mud, or vegetable mould and barnyard manure, made the season before, and well fermented. Spread on the surface, and cross-plough six inches deep. Mark out your rows ten feet apart, let them run north and south, if possible, and plant the vines six feet apart in the rows. This gives you sixty square feet to each vine, and seven hundfed and twenty-six vines to the acre. These distances will enable you to plough and culti- vate between the rows, and to go with the cart to carry off the crop. The sun will also reach the earth, and warm it to a greater depth than would happen in closer planting, and your vines will keep in better health, and will give you abundant crops. SECRETARY'S REPORT. 239 Take care to spread out the roots of the vine in every direc- tion, covering them six inches with tlie soil, and leaving the ends of the roots a little deeper than the crown of the plant. Press the earth rather firmly to the roots, keep down all weeds, and stir the earth frequently. A light root crop may be taken from the middle of the rows the first season to lighten the expenses of cultivation. To avoid unnecessary repetition in the matter of pruning, V. Three specimens of Minnow. Pimdidus pisculentiis. C. & V. Three specimens of Minnow. Fuiididus multifasciatus. C. & V. One specimen of Hardhead. Alosa menhaden. Storer. One specimen of American Turbot. Platessa ohlonga. De Kay. One specimen of Spotted Flounder. Pleuronectes maculatits. Mitchell. One specimen of American Sole. Achirus mollis. Cuvier. One specimen of Flounder. Platessa plana. Storer. One specimen of Common Eel. Anguilla bostoniensis. Leseur. One specimen of Dog Fish, (factus.) Acanthias americanus. Storer. One specimen of Sand Launce. Ammodytes americanus. De Kay. One specimen of Lamprey. Petromyzon americanus. Leseur. HERPETOLOGY. One specimen of Spotted Tortoise. Emys guttata. Storer. Donor, G. T. Brown. • THE AGRICULTURAL LIBRARY. The State agricultural library connected with the office of the Secretary of the Board, has received but few accessions during the past year, there having been no appropriation from which new additions could be procured. It is desirable that this valuable collection of books, the most extensive, at the present time, of any of a similar character in New England, should be kept up with the times, and every effort will be made to procure such additions, from time to time, as the means at command make practicable. 246 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. It is more generally used for reference than ever before, especially during the sessions of the legislature, and it is important that some permanent fund should be provided bji^ which the new publications should be procured as they appear. THE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE. Some progress has been made, since my last Annual Report, in the establishment of an agricultural college under the Act of Congress of July 2d, 1862. The Act of the legislature creating a board of trustees, practically limited them in the choice of a location, to those places which should raise by subscription, of otherwise, the sum of seventy-five thousand dollars for building purposes. Under this condition, but four towns came forward, and, with great public spirit and liberality, offered that amount, either in the form of a bona fide sub- scription, or of a guarantee that they would comply with the condition imposed by law. These places were Lexington, Springfield, Northampton, and Amherst. h The trustees, after examining several locations with great care and solicitude, came to a nearly unanimous decision to locate the college in the town of Amherst, chiefly on the ground that the farm lands, presented for their consideration, were better adapted for the objects in view than those offered else- where. The lands, consisting of about four hundred acres, were accordingly purchased, and the preliminary steps taken for the establishment of the college. This location was approved, after examination, by the governor and council. Whatever may be said of the action of the trustees in regard to the matter of location, it is probable that any impartial body of men, appointed as agents of the State to act under similar circumstances, with all the information necessary to a decision placed in their possession, would have come to the same conclusion. If there is any reasonable ground of complaint, therefore, in regard to the question of location, it can hardly be made against the action of the trustees. They did what they thought to be for the best interests of the State and the institution, so far as it was in their power under the law. It is to be hoped, therefore, that there will be a general acquiescence in the decision, and that the agricultural com- munity will cooperate with the trustees in establishing an SECRETARY'S REPORT. 247 inclustrial college, which shall be an honor alike to the Commonwealth and the country at large. It is designed to establish an independent institution, without any direct connection with Amherst, or any other college, in accordance with what appeared to be the direction of public sentiment. Arrangements will soon be made to proceed with the erection of suitable buildings, but it must, in the nature of things, be some time before the college can be put into a condi- tion to receive students. Of the aggregate fund, consisting of scrip for three hundred and sixty thousand acres of the public lands, one-tenth of which, or thirty-six thousand acres only could be appropriated to the purchase of lands, three-tenths were placed under the control of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, leaving but two hundred and sixteen thousand acres to be sold to constitute a permanent working fund. Only a part of this has been sold as yet, and that at an average price of only about eighty cents an acre. Some time will be required to realize the whole amount. In the meantime the lands at Amherst, purchased by the trustees, have been leased to the former owners at an average of about five per cent, a year on the purchase money, or about five dollars an acre rent, including woodlands, waste and tillage, and under reasonable restrictions as to crops, manure, stock, in o o l-t o CO CO o ^ C-1 in in o o o •^ o fBuosjad JO aniBA i-h" 9& of CO in CO C<1_ in CO^ in" CO I-T OO co"" o •!l5" cJ 00_ i-h" 00 05 I-H I-T o o •^ O o ^ o o o o O o o • o Oi o o o o o o o o o •a^vi o o ■* o Q ' 1 ^ 1 o (-J o o o ^ o o f-H o o o lO o -83 VB9I 10 ani'BA o_ o CO cq_ o^ co^ in in CO r^^ o in cfT of CO I— oo C4 co~ ■* c 03 OO 05 CO CO 05 . CO CO in •jBaX 3qj 1 °' t^ o 03 o CO CO OO O in M ■* 00 I-H 00 ' o o (M CO ■^ CO CO in CO in o CO ■* CQ o o C-1 ■* CO 1 CO 00 CD CD CD ■^ 03 1-H l^ l^ a> OO C^l C5 C5 I-H i~ CO Ol I-H CO CD Satpniani ^oa — t- o> CO r-i^ IN in •* 00 (33 in CD CD CO CD r^ i-H f-H sasuadxa ^aajino m \a vo o o (M rd 00 CO t^ in o o o in •pred sajim} (M t- in o -* CO in IN CO 05 o o o M CO CO i^ 05 lO CD ^ CI I— CO ^ •* ' CJ c^ o '^ CO CD CO 05 03 o o >* CO TJ* -BjSpnB sniniraaj^ to lO ■* •* CO ■<)1 i^ ■* in in ■* CO CD ^ o o O in o in m o o o Q O o o o o c^ o i^ C• CO. o CO IN in 00 •* CO in in t- in CD I-H iH (M o CO I-H CO CO t^ t~ Cl 00 CO CO CO CO l^ CO l^ in in C<1 t~ CO o in ^ en CO an} JOJ s^diaaaa CO o ■^ ■* 00_ 1-^ in^ o. ■*_ co_ in i-j^ 00^ 03 CD r-T i-h" T-T I-T in" tA' r^ I-T i-h' cf T^ I-T r^ cf S^ lO in 1— ( o o o •f o 00 £35 £: o t- o o 1 ^ o L^ IN o in r-\ o o ■* 05 o in o CO ■saainos jaq^o nv s 03 O s O CO in T-H IN 1^ 05 1-H o in g s ?§ ^ i Tjl CO w w r-t rH •>»< I-H CD CO CQ CO C<1_ CO ^ cf I-T I-T o o o •* O O O o O o o Q o in o ■BUopBnop , o o o CD o O o o O o in o o t~ o ' CO (^ CO OO in CO o CO Tt< 1- t- 00 in -* CO puB giaqmani Ma^ " o I-' t- in 1— t CO I-H t- l^ CO CD 03 l-H IN I-H IM o o CT> OS oq 00 o in ■* o 2 •punj inaaeoi 1 " lO 1 o i 00 O in I' o OO in 1 O 05 ■^ c^ ^ OH "tc i^ I* o cq CO ^ s -jadeq^joamoaai s o rH IN OO CO CO CO •* N 00 CO in 03 CO Cd 00 O o o Q o o O O O Q o O o o o •tHinaMnom 1 ° o o ° o o o o o ° o O o o o o o o o o o o o o o -nioo aq^ inojj ^ s s s s § o CD s s 8 § o CD s 8 § paAiaaaj ^unoiny • • • • • • • ji a" g 01 • • • § M o 02 m HA i 1 (a .2 5" 00 tfi 9, 5 u M <1> 5" § in u w CI 5 o m Pi CO <1> St3 b CI. ca 2" •a 1 3 a O. cT 3 •a •a •a 13 t3 2 o 2 o o o O i^ a 3 a i a 2 s P4 a g 3 Is b fe= fc= ^ w w w a a Ii< APPENDIX. li s o o g inn o -^ 00 t- o o 2 o CO >o 8 o o o_ oo" m 3 o o ^V '^ o lO lO CO o l-H rH cf rH~ I-T €& i. S !5 U3 o o t- OJ o UO (M t^ I'* . o lO t-- f-( o CO W ^H OS (^ CO OJ ■* t~ 4H* CO S3 ■«i* CO CO rH eo CO ^J* 00 >o CO ^ C<1. O^ ■* CO r-^ » r4 tH I-T I-H o i2 o o o o o o o o o t^ o o >o l-O o o lO o «o r*" lO w 00 I- lO ■* b- C^l S t- rl< 00 l— oo T-H o o 00 CO 00 1^ oo "^ L-- 00 CO m I-l I— I I-H I-T ■* S e©_ fH t— ■* la o t^ U3 C3 CO CO tr- CO o (N ■^ o 03 OJ 00 "H te f 00 52 IM iH CO CO o> »o CO l- 52 ■^ T-H 00 tH 1^ oo I-J^ ■^ 00^ o r-J^ 00 tH 03 n<^ cc^ co~ CO rH cf uT of I-H rH l@ -^ «© a t~ ■* ICI o t^ U5 o 00 CO ■* eo O IM tX o OT o OO -* CO CO C-1 t^ C<1 o »-H lO lO t-» c^ 3! 00 CO o tH o lO (M 00^ *^ oo co_ <* •*_ •* N CT 00 i-T C4 I-T •*" Cif m I& 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 o o s CO S5 •-H 05 o >o O o CO >.o to lO O 00 l~» CD -^ "^ m •-1 CO CO r-i o _^1 8 8 8 8 C5 03 O ss Oi o 1 1 CO lO CO o O !9 1—* o o '4< I-H 05 -ti £ CD fH U3 C<1 ^ l~ £& o O o <_, o o O o o o o O o o o o o o o o g 9k o § g g g § g o (^1 CD CD CO CO CD CO CD y CD CO m ' . • . . • (-1 . • • >I • • • o3 ^ s • • a u ^ "3 ^ «" -t^ >^ '3 ee m 3 o 00 > u o o o s •E .a o a 3 en a u cd 01 J"! CJ 3 a 5S 'a 1 n pq a ;zi n s n S5 S o g ^ c3 0) ^ od H 0) GQ 2 ^ P > oo (U 3 a 09 a ■ a a a ce p. 0) i £" S 2 «=• a « 03 3 1-5 ^1 OS , 00 -g tT o Oj -*J 3 T3 trj CD S CO a 4H. OJ4 Ol Ol 2 a cS .-3 -^ c S =3 ^s -, o p< ^ "^ s 1, t-t— cS '• 2 :: H rt a ^7 I. « • o E^ a •oi35S.^=>3 t^ C OJ r/ " "Z ^ i;.= 3 5P*-J5^ ■ u X — :^ ^ aj a 3 .^ 2 3 T- "7 13 C^ "3 Vi ^ -^ i :3 « -=■ . - >^-3 ^ _ -S « t- "^ I oi . " f c = „-. O u 2 z u! J ^ r^ w X B OS O; a M « < oi zt> i5 3 I ►- 17'"-- 3 a bl • »J ti s- T a a *i 00 H ■' * OH" w e aa " -7 :3 fc g g >= f- =s a e £ s « 5 « 3 ce 3 . o > F14 0) ■ZS CJ a 0 -^ tiO J3 a J3 Ft It » 0 !?; jS 0 s TH •d o3 « Q hH £ o a •n OQ W V _ X t.< •a ® 3 tf -^ -«^ P 3! X .i cta QJ a X ~ -•J t^ t- a fl^ a. rs ce "O 3 B k^ 3 a' 3 ^ „ oT ^ ? -H >_( ^ ^ ^ ° -; • 2 i- ° S = c a ci£- J= I Ztn I. 3 o a 3 p. M o3 3 u a> « -§3 3 o3 P. a o O n 3 oi .h! a ■0-3 2 3 cos" pja . 3 3 o a a ce to ce so . o 3-3 .■S 3 B =e ■a o 3 J3 3 < v) "3 U 3 > OS ce OS Qj B M « M g g ■7 M a w S £ -J 00 •>: , U :i: £d , I J J iJ Q a Q ! I Q Q 0 So SSS^^ WES ee D o o bs ce E- f- v: 00 b: cS o o .5 52 I. 5-3 -3 fe 3 3 :q z OS ce I c4 ce ^ .^ O 5 3 -H 3CC * I-H c; - '• I V OS Ckl &3 I '^ til s! ce _; r- f - - ^ .— M 00 75 M a ^j !!. a. oi gaga o < < -e lii APPENDIX. H I— I H I— I H OCDOiO'^'*" toco C0:O C010C5COOCO ICCO 8000 oooooo oioo oooooo CCOO-H JDCflOCOOiCO OiWrHCO OO-^lOl^O-^ r-l r-t kCCOrH r-l rH I I I I I I I I O lO I ' I 1 ^ ' ' ' I I 'I to lO m I I I I I O OOOO o o O OOOO o o I I I I I I I I o o lO ■^ «e I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o o o o I « I ^ I I I ■ o lO oo o oo> o iOO iC iNr-1 r1 O O I _ I I 1 I lO OO I I I I I I 05T^COOO»OC50ii— I tOCOC-l'*tC"*'*IN'* 1 1° 1^° «D OOOO i-i ■1 »^ OS c^ cc o I— CTJ O ^ >0 05 O^J -^ i-HNMNCCI?JCOC^ Cocoas OOOOOOOOOO lOOOOOOOCCOiO H t^ CO ^ w5 1^ I— 1 1^ CO »c *-t CO^HCO'"_Ol^tO»OOCi W O » OS CO CJ I- M (M r-l i-icjco3-*cSicrcoe^ ooooooo»oooo t^iCOiO^^COI^CiiC^^O COCOCOCC^CKOOOOfti— I C^iOOOCOCOCOl-iOtqr-irl §0050000000>0 OOOOOOOOOO 1— COCOCOCOO^-^kOCOCOiOCO-^ oo o OCO CO oco t- oo ooo oo ooo lO O f-f 00 t^ NCO O^'H'jf I I I I I I 800000IOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO OO lOOO t^iOiOOOO O^OiOOOO »000 lOO OOCTSCTSt^^OSl-^t^COUDCO kOT}400l^-i CO CO N CO (M i-H r-i N rt i-l C^ N IM r-( CO i-H C^ r1 S O OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO O OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOiO id 0'-HOO'^r-(COC10i'*< 05NO»-'r-400^'^0-^ i-i r-i(M 'Ji 1-1 O ■* n CO rl 00 C^ lO -* CO (M •* r-1 C< eOOOOC1"*I05»00 0 ^ -^r-ln rH rHr-( ioc>iococO'--''^»0:0OT)iOr-t lip i-i CO r-( i-i i-( CO N I |^^ CO OOOOOOQ OOO O ooooooo ooo O OOCOOCOt-tCD iOC^Oi lO T-H rH 1-1 C^ W CO I-i T-1 O OOOOOOOOOO OOOOQOOOO in O OOOOOOOOOliS OlOOOOOOOO t- iO i-HUSIMNC^I'^COCOl^t^ OOCOOO^lOlCOCiOO o r-f i-( lO C4 -^ 1-1 rH 1—1 r-t I-I i-llOCOCNi-t CO r-l rH >oooooooo< ooo N OOCOt- r-l "^S22'^^^ooooo OOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOO lOOOOOOOOOOiO CD lO CO O 0:t O 115 00 O 05 rH M -^ -^ O O O O O t-»rH OS C^ T-1 IMrHfqrlCO rlrli-liH rl rH CO N IM (N IM rH rH COt^t—ODCDOODlOOlOt— O C000O5C: r § -HH «iH-^ t-i. (.2 S_-„'„ „,r-=:3 •^•■.2^> _^ O <1> 0 ejr-(co . coeoiH OOOOO OOOiOt- cr C^l O GO CI CO CO rl Ol CO CO no s H US M O o 1 ■a . . . . P. . . . 1 . -M ...... . Massachusetts, Essex, Middlesex, Middlesex North, . Middlesex South, . Worcester, VV orcester West, Worcester North, . Worcester South, . Worcester South-East, Hampshire, Franklin & Hampshire, Highland, Hampden, Hampden East, Franklin, Berkshire, Housatonic, . Hoosac Valley, Norfolk, . Bristol, . Plymouth, Barnstable, Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, APPENDIX. Iv 3 B O O -I 5^ 1 -SPHpOJiJ nrjBj JO pisaq aq^ aapun ano piTjd IjUib iBjoi oo liSOOOCO OOu^ OiOOOOOOOOO oo t-iooooii lOiciN >ccooo>oo>oocqo 'iNl- 'oCOCOOO MOOO OOt~-#l^CCOl^o>OCo''~ f-H rH 1-1 r-lr-H OO C^ I-t r-t (M W i-l 00 o rH O TO TO ■pBajg naoo |S, 1 1 gSe SS8SS S 8 g 4fe --I •puajg aBtpni puB a^a OOOOOOOOOOiC OOOOOOOlOO o 0 0»OOOOOU3lOOl-» ICiOOirSlOOOl^O »o O CO •pwja nBaqjii OOOOC-JOOOOOiOl- OOOiOOOiOt-O «3 CO^C^IOiOO-^tMl^CCCO i-lUOCOrHCOiCiCDiOCO rH ^*— i I— ( T— t i-^ rH o TO •jfeuoH o oeoioooo oooooooio la O lOiOl-OOiOOiOOOOOOCT C-l lO Tjt r1>0 O CO rH rH Cd CD •* CO TO m i-H i-H •esaaqO ,g, , ,8Sgg8g88 SS888888S ,8 S •^ OTOtMOiCOCDCDO iCCDrHOt^OOCOr-HI:-. TO ^ rH TOo opaooooooooo s^ fliO'^COiOO-^CSCDOrHCD laOiOOOCOlCrHOOO'-O tT rH M rH rH TO T-H rH rH rH rH (N i-H f-l(M IM N rH rH jg •J1I!K S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o TO m •gdojf) pa^BA -mno jaq^o A'uy OOOCCOCa oS OO ■* CO ' ' ' ' ' ' c-ioo-Ki-Mc^TO ' ' ' ' mo ' OtK ' ' o 53 rHTOHrHrH N ■* '~' ?i •BJaMOJJ oo o o-^oioooo loooooooiooirtia os oo o cco(NOOo (MriSoococ^oicqi- o (Mi.O >0 OOICDO'CKTOIN TOCOOTOOCOTOCTO-Hrt< ^ C^rH r-t rl i-HrHrH rH rH rH rH (M rH •* rH rH °§ •simjj looioio ooiooiooo iniooooooicomo ^ (M O I- (M O l~ 1^1 >0 W lO t^ I- I- O O O O O l~ O I- lO "^ TO»OTO!M 'TO-^rHCOH-iOCN OOirrTOtMX'TOI-eCOas o COOOOTjO CMCO-^CC-^tMrH rHTjiTOTON'^OiOSCdCOrH O •qsnjg ujoouiooja 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •8dojo ^ooa pnB niiiJO joj piBd (JiUIB IBlOi S34 00 33 00 13 50 27 50 34 00 30 00 16 50 15 00 33 50 34 75 7 85 228 00 146 50 97 00 3 00 54 00 28 00 37 00 t «873 10 •sdojo ^ooa 5j uiuao -10} pa -pjBMB^,raBlB!JOX OOO O OOOOOO iCiOOOOOOOOOO OOiO O OCOOOiO l-CDOiOOOOOOC>0 rfTOTj< M TtiOOrHOTO rf t~OOtCr^t~TH^OCl-TO TOTOiO iO TOTOTOWrHTO TO (M'^JHOi iOl-(NTOCO ^ NrH S i-h" •gdojo }ooy puB uiBj") JOJ psjaj j -JO tunooiB iw^ox 1 gggg°2SSSS'5'=' 12 '5 '5 ■=■ S "= o <= <= <=> >« OOOOOOOOOOOO C30l040000000t^ l^rHI^ClOqtO-^OCJ^OSO CDC^-HCOC t* L U '•• u a O 03 ■s-a pJ3 al ^11 1-3 ^^ ■s ^ 13 a -^5 "2" si. at ^ u o fa ha 4) rt go l§2 -cos er of perso; ived prei gratuities SOCIETIES. tj 3 3 o ti nt 0 raisin s. nt aw [ out e. §°5 -i2 3 SCO 3-E 9 3 « g 3.^ a 3 p. t-< 3 •§ 3.2,-S •° g-w a cs a 2-a £ O cS § 2 « 2 0-£ oSte g S a a--« g Pi CQ a » 3 g Ce EQ g o cs g S ta . $0 75 Chester, 35 25 Northampton, • • . 19 25 Chicopee, . 5 00 Peru, . . 45 25 Cummington, 3 00 Pittsfield, . 50 Dal ton. 7 50 Sandisfield, 7 00 Hinsdale, . 80 75 Springfield, 50 Huntington, 5 25 Washington, « 11 25 Lanesborough, 3 25 Windsor, 50 Lee, . 5 00 . 135 75 Worthington, Total, . 12 00 Middlefield, $444 00 Ixii APPENDIX. HAMPDEN EAST, Brimfield, . . f 0 00 Wales, . . ... 100 00 Holland, . 00 00 Ware, . 00 00 Ludlow, ... . . 00 00 . 00 00 Wilbraham, Total, . . 00 00 Monson, . mo 00 Palmer, . 00 00 FRANKLIN. Bernardston, m 00 Monroe, . $1 00 Charlemont, . 3 50 Montague, . . . . 16 75 Colerain, .... 31 50 Northfield, . . 11 00 Conway, . . . 51 25 Orange, . 15 00 Deerfield, . . 83 00 Shelburne, . . 254 00 Erving, 8 00 Sunderland, '. , 27 50 Gill, . . . . . 21 50 Warwick, . . , . 2 00 Greenfield, . . . . ' . 159 30 7 60 Whately, . Total, . 4 50 Leverett, . . $722 90 Leyden, . 21 50 BERK SHIRE Adams, . $82.00 Hinsdale, . . 136 50 Alford, . . 4 00 Lanesborough, . . 203 00 Becket, . 54 50 J^66} • • • • . 86 50 Cheshire, . . 47 25 Lenox, ... . 197 50 Curtisville, . 7 00 Monterey, . 1 50 Dalton, . 20 50 New'Ashford, 4 00 Great Barrington, . 19 00 New Marlborough, . 5 00 Hancock, . 4 50 Peru, .... . 11 00 APPENDIX. 1 • •• 1X111 BERKSHIRE— Concluded. Pittsfield, . . 1458 75 Tyringham, . U 00 Richmond, . . 15 50 Weishington, 5 00 Sheffield, . . 31 50 Williamstown, . 72 25 South Adams, . 61 25 . 102 00 Windsor, . Total, . 7 75 Stockbridge, $1,241 75 HOUSATONIC. Alford, 129 25 New Marlborough, . S$38 00 Becket, 11 50 New Lebanon, N. Y., . 1 00 Cheshire, . 4 50 Pittsfield, . 4 00 Egremont, . . 106 50 Richmond, . . 15 00 Great Barrington, 177 50 Sandisfield, 7 00 Hillsdale, . 3 00 Sheffield, . . 168 25 Lee, .... 52 00 Stockbridge, . 83 75 Lenox, 80 00 Tyringham, 7 00 Monterey, , 25 25 3 25 West Stockbridge, Total, . 7 50 Mount Washington, . . !g827 25 HOOSAC VALLEY, Cheshire, . . 138 00 Pittsfield, . . $3 00 Clarksburg, . 15 00 Pownal, Vt., . 19 00 Florida, . 33 75 South Adams, . . 115 00 Hinsdale, . 8 00 Stamford, . 8 00 Lanesborough, . 4 00 . 35 00 Williamstown, . Total, . 128 00 Lenox, . $639 75 North Adams, . . 233 00 Ixiv APPENDIX. NORFOLK, Braintree, . . U 00 Needham, . . $128 85 Brookline, . • . 18 00 Quincy, 8 00 Canton, . 12 GO Randolph, . 8 50 Dedham, . 180 00 Roxbury, . 3' 75 Dorchester, . 35 25 Sharon, 8 00 Dover, . 42 40 Stoughton, . 41 00 Foxborough, 12 00 Walpole, . 11 50 Franklin, . 1 31 00 West Roxbury, 68 00 Medfield, . 9 50 Weymouth, 5 00 Medway, . 23 25 25 00 Wrentham, Total, . • • 18 00 Milton, $683 00 BRISTOL Attleborough, . $20 00 Raynham, . . $182 00 Berkley, . . • . 24 25 Rehoboth, . . 68 75 Dighton, 5 50 Seekonk, , 5 00 • Easton, . 41 50 Somerset, . ... 4 25 Fairhaven, . 25 Swansey, . . . . 18 50 Fall River, . . 18 50 Taunton, . . . . 543 50 Mansfield, . . 19 25 Towns out of the County, . 115 00 New Bedford, . 11 75 Total, . . . ^ Jl,266 50 Norton, . 188 50 PLYMOUTH. Abington, . . $11 25 East Bridgewater, . $99 50 Bridgewater, . 448 52 Halifax, . 46 00 Carver, . 20 00 Hanson, . ' 2 00 Duxbury, . • 75 Kingston, . 9 75 APPENDIX. Ixv PLY^IOUTH— Concluded. Lakeville, . . 137 70 Plympton, . . an 25 Marshfield, . 6 50 Rochester, . 9 25 Mattapoisett, 50 South Scituate, . 2 00 Middleborough, . . 163 10 Wareham, 1 40 North Brldgewater, . . 105 00 8 25 West Bridgewater, Total, . . 113 70 Pembroke, . 11,163 17 Plymouth, . . 66 75 BARNSTABLE, Barnstable, . Dennis, Orleans, Provincetown, 1378 32 4 00 7 62 3 25 Sandwich, Yarmouth, Total, $24 00 17 00 UU 19 NANTUCKET, Nantucket, |393 BO MARTHA'S VINEYARD. Chilmark, . . $110 79 . 43 80 Tisbury, Total, . . $194 08 Edgartown, . $348 67 INDEX TO THE SECRETARY'S REPORT, Page. Adipocere, paper upon, 228, 230 Agassiz, lecture by Prof., 61, 127, 133, 168, 185 Agricultural College, location of the, 48, 50, 246 Agricultural education, remarks on, 44, 46, 51 Agricultural library, 245, 246 Agricultural machinery, 6 Agricultural schools, 49, 169, 231, 246 Animals most useful to New England, 118, 120, 122, 124 Animals, selection of, .37, 117, 120, 123 Apple-tree, insects injurious to the, 145,147,153 Ashes, use of as' manure, 88, 90, 93, 96 Barns, structure of, . . 218, 220 Bedding for stock, 38 Breeding, principles of, 127, 129, 132, 136, 138 Board, public meeting at Greenfield, 30 Buildings, location of, ■. . . 36, 38, 214, 218 Bull, lecture by E. W., 64,68,72,80 Bushes, how to kill, . . 85, 90, 95, 98 Cabbage, history and culture of the, 196, 198, 204 Cabinet, the State, 242, 244 Canada thistle, how to eradicate, 83, 86, 95, 96 Canker worm, description of the, 155, 157 Cattle commissioners, report of the, 7, 8 Cattle husbandry, discussion on, 38, 39, 117, 165 Climate, control over the, 68, 70, 185 College, the agricultural, 45, 47, 49, 50, 103, 246 Concentrated manures, 6, 42 Contagion, something about, 10, 11, 28, 30, 43 Corn crop, discussion on the 55, 59, 62, 80, 126 Crops, management of, . . 39, 40, 55, 58, 225 Crops, weighing of, ; 225, 227 Dairy, importance of the, 119, 121, 126 Dog law, discussion on the, 167, 168 Drift soils, characteristics of, . . . . . . . . 112, 173, 174, 176 Economy of the farm, 36, 55, 62, 07, 85 Education at home and abroad, . . 169, 171, 172 Experiments with the cattle disease, 12, 24, 29 Farm buildings, essay on, 213, 215, 217 Farm, management of a, 35, 37, 82 INDEX. Ixvii rage. Farms, statement on, 41 Fruit, culture of, ... 221, 223, 225 Fruit trees, economy of, 40, 221 Garden vegetables, essay on, 186, 188, 195, 200 Glacial action, evidence of, 173, 175, 177, 184 Glaciers, operation of, 173, 170, 180, 182 Grapes, cultivation of, C4, 66, 70, 74, 76, 80, 236, 241 Huntingdon, T. G., essay by, 186, 190, 196, 205 Hybrids, what are they, . . . . , 79, 133, 135 Indian corn, cultivation of, 55, 57, 80, 126 Insects, injury done by, • . . . . 158, 160 Insects, lecture on, 139, 145 Kerosene destructive to insects, 152 Lime in the animal structure, 128, 165 Loring, Dr. G. B., address by, . . 30, 35 Magnesia, abundance of, Ill, 112 Managing a farm, 33, 35, 43, 55, 59 Manures, use of, 6, 57, 59, 61, 67, 70, 85^66, 189 Marl, accumulations of, 114, 117 Merinoes, management of, 162, 164, 166 Moore, J. B., essay by, 221, 224 Moss, how to get rid of, 96, 97 Museum of Zoology, visit to the, 169, 231, 232 " Natives," description of the, 121,129 New England Agricultural Society, .6, 247 Onions, cultivation of, 190, 192, 195 Orchards, condition of our, 221, 223 Ox-eye daisy, how to exterminate, 97 Pasture lands, improvement of, 81, 84, 86, 89, 95, 100, 164 Percheron horses, account of, 232 Perkins, C. 0., essay by, 213, 215, 218 Plant lice, injury done by, 141,143 Plants, nourishment of, 108, 109 Plaster, use of, 84, 86, 88, 94, 98 Pitch pine, cultivation of the, 208,210,213 Pleuro-pneumonia, recovery from, 7, 10, 28 Pruning the vine, 71, 73, 75 Renovation of pastures, 81, 85, 90, 97, 99, 101 Rogers, Prof. Wm. B., lecture by, 104, 108, 112, 117 Roots of plants, 61, 62, 63 Sanborn, F. G., lecture by 139, 144, 160 Sand, use of as bedding, • . . ■ . . , .38,39 Science and practice, . . . • * . . 31, 33, 45, 105, 110, 137 Sheep husbandry, discussion on, . .... 5, 161, 163, 166 Ixviii INDEX. Page. Shelter, importance of, . 38 Shorthorns, allusions to, 37 Silk culture, experiments in, . . . . " 153 Soils, origin of, 104, 106, 111, 168, 180 Species and breeds, 134, 135 Squash, introduction and cultivation of the, 205, 208 Stock, selection of, 37, 38, 117, 120, 123, 126 Study of soils, 112,114,116 Thayer, statement of Dr., 27, 30 Vine, cultivation of the, 67, 69, 71, 74, 80, 241 Walnut, sprouting of the, 92 "Wood, time of cutting, 91, 93 Wool, fineness of, 163,165 t ABSTRACT OF RETURNS OF THE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES OF MASSACHUSETTS, 18 6 4. EDITED BY CHARLES L. FLINT, SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. BOSTON: WRIGHT & POTTER, STATE PRINTERS, No. 4 Spring Lane. 1865. PREFACE. The returns of the various agricultui'al societies were more meagre this year than usual, added to which many of them failed to get their Transactions printed in season to make it practicable to use them in making up the following Abstract. I have, also, condensed that part of the returns wliich were received in time, somewhat more than usual, so as to bring the size of the volume to reasonable limits, even at the risk of leaving out some topics that might have appeared under other circumstances. I must again urge upon the societies the importance of greater promptness in publishing their returns, and of putting them into a shape that will secure them a more careful study on the part of farmers into whose hands they happen to fall. The money invested in printing is the most judicious expenditure a society can make, and they cannot fully and honorably discharge theii' duty to the State without incurring tliis expenditure. C. l. f. OFFICERS OF THE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES, 1865. MASSACHUSETTS. President— GEOnGE W. LYMAN, of Boston. Secretary— VETER C. BROOKS, Jr., of Boston. ESSEX. President— J OSETU HOWE, of Methuen. Secretary— CRARLES P. PRESTON, of Danvers. MIDDLESEX. President— W. W. CHENERY, of Belmont. Secretartj—JOKS B. MOORE, of Concord. MIDDLESEX SOUTH. President— WILLIAM G. LEWIS, of Framlngham. Secretary— 3 MIES W. BROWN, of Framingham. MIDDLESEX NORTH. President— E. P. SPALDING, of Chelmsford. Secretary— REl^BY P. PERIUNS, of LoweU. WORCESTER. President— CRABLES E. MILES, of Worcester. Secretary— J 0R^ D. WASHBURN, of Worcester. WORCESTER WEST. President— ROLLIS TIDD, of New Braintree. 5ecre have visibly deteriorated. Whole States have been impoverished. In our own Commonwealth, the average of the crops of corn, wheat, rye, barley, oats and hay, was quite low in 1807, but it was some fifteen per cent, lower in 1855. In New York, where the average crop of wheat eighty years ago was from twenty-five to thirty bushels, it is now only fourteen bushels per acre. Ohio, which eighty years ago presented to the farmer a rich unbroken, soil in the wild state of nature, now yields a diminishing aver- age per acre of twelve bushels of wheat. In 1850, the average yield of wheat per acre did not exceed seven bushels in Virginia and Nortli Carolina, and five bushels in Alabama. It is a well authenticated fact, that of the one hundred and sixty-three million acres of improved land in the United States, three-fourths receive no return of the necessary elements of vegetable growth that are carried off by the annual harvest. A distinguished agriculturist calculated in 1850, the annual waste 12 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. of these elements to be equal to the mineral constituents of fifteen luuulred million bushels of corn, and that the amount of only two of these elements thus lost hi a single year, was worth at their market price, twenty million dollars. " To suppose," says the' author of these estimates, " that this state of things can continue, and we, as a nation, remain prosperous, is simjily ridiculous. We have as yet much virgin soil, and it will be long ere we reap the reward of our present improvidence. It is merely a question of time, and time will solve the problem in a most unmistalcable manner. "What with our earth-butchery and prodigality, we are each year losing the intrinsic'essence of our vitality. Our country has not yet grown feeble from this loss of its life-blood, but the hour is fixed when, if our present system continue, the last throb of the nation's heart will have ceased, and when America, Greece and Rome, will stand among the ruins of the past." Is it to-day, I would ask, quite certain that our count ly has not already grown feeble from this cause ? "When we reflect upon the notorious fact, that nowhere has this deterioration of the soil been so deep, so general, so exigent, as at the South, under the combined effect of an exhaustive cul- ture, and the rude husbandry of slaves, incapable of developing more than a small portion of the native resources of the earth, and remember the aggressive spirit in which Southern states- men pushed for the acquisition of new territory on our Southern border, and for domination in all the public domain, and the connection of this fatal policy with the present civil war, who sh»ll say that an accursed thirst for land, more land and new land, stimulated by a wasteful, profligate agriculture, that robbed the soil of its wealth, and the man who tifled it of his wages, has not, in some degree, ministered to that madness of treason .which seeks with all the arts and engines of destruction the ruin of the nation ? It needs not, however, the present calamity of civil war, or the deserts that mark the limits of ancient states, to make clear as light that a migratory, nomadic agriculture, that first plun- ders the earth and then abandons it, must at last enfeeble the national strength. It is all involved in the proposition which science has over and over again demonstrated, that every crop takes from the soil ingredients which are indispensable to vege- tation, but of which no soil contains an inexhaustible supply. A(^K10Ur/rURM ANI> TllK INDrS'l'KMAL AIM'S. \'.\ As !i MtH'ossJiry corollnrv lo lliis |»i-o|i()si(ion, scinuM^ (Mijoiiis U|»()u ii,i;Ti(Mil(tin> Jis Mm i-oiulilioii of a siilf sustaiuiiii;- uiul liisliiii;; viliilily llio pr(>ct>|)(,, lliiil. wliaUnor is (nkeii l'ri)n\ llic soil l>y i\\o luirvcsl. Muisl, lul I'oslorcMJ (o i( ii|i,!UM. TIu^ viohilioii of tliis' |n't>- co\){, iiidii'ls an iiijtiiy upon Iho coiinlrv, n. wioii^- upon (he raco. 1(. (iMHJs (UiMi lo IIh> (^xliuclion of lln^ Iiuuimu spin-it's, or wlial is (juili^ as bad, lo tluusi, if bMckwiifd IowmpiIs luu'liiu-isin. To tii'slroy l!u* pro(luc(iv(Mi(*ss of llio soil, lo sipiandfr I1h> cltMncnls ol" Uuii pi'oduclivtMicss, is lo di'slroy lli<> hopes of civili/.tMl luiniMii ■ ily upon cniili. II, rol>s poslcfily <>f ils jusi, ltirlhfii!;lil lo a oai'ct'i- of progress. Ily what ri^lil. shidl \v(\ Iho cn'aluri^s of a diiy, Ilic Iransitory Itniiuils of Ihis fair ami finlih' cailh, a lilllu Avhtl(> iulrustiMl |,o our k(M>pinu;, despoil il, of Ihai wilhonl whicli linnian aihanccnicnl, human r\isl(MH'(>, is impossildr, and turn il, over, sirrilo and impo\ immsIumI, Id |,Iu) pMUU'aliou wo s\uuuiou info boiu^', and (•hai'i;(^ as \vn aii^ char^t^d, with tho gi-tMil, diisliny of man ? Is nol Ihis lo ItMupl. fho ortMd.iu^' l*rovid(>nco ? TluMuii'h thu dark iidiniludc of ('(uinlb'ss n^i^s whihi ui;;hl. brooihMl o\rr chaos, lo Ihal dawn wIumi lif;hr was kiudlrd in I1h> h(>a\(Mi;, and tho niorniu^ stars saujj; lo!j;(«lhi'r, ami lhi'()Uj.;h all I be rounds of cliiuij^o that lii!,ht has shown upon siiu'c li,u;ht was, Ihis iVa'-nicnl. «\irlh has biM'u prcpaiini',' for Iho habitalion of Iho sons of mrn. Hy liro and furnace heals, and icy eoii !'riiidin<;' <;hu'.i(ir, by Ihe earllKpndvo ami Ihe \itl cano, Ihe ujiheaval (d' mounlains, Ihe ocean's tUUnjiio and Ihe ri\'er's Hood, liy ti^uipest and whirlwind, by Ihe powerful action of th(^ sun lhrou<;'li oons of altoriuitin^' da,y and ni"'hl. and i'\ri- nnolviuj;' si^asons, by tliti kini;'donis (d' v(^^'etab|(> and luiimal life whosi^ uuilliliuliiu)us tribes ruled by rhi/odoid. and uiaslodon are now i^xlinet, Ihe moist, a,bsorbenl, llueul, vibratory ainios- j)heru is cvoIvimI and purilied, tlu^ solid roidv is made and CMMunbhMl, and ils powdi>red in-ains soi'ted and washiMJ and iniu};'led in Ihe loam and mould, the How and disti-ibnl ion of llltMVattn'S ar(^ li xrd, and all things loned lo Ihe leniperalnro tluit suits the hom(> of man. Throu-di all IIk^ calaidysms of llie W(nld, lh(^ nnnerals of the hai-vest ha\c been borne as in Ibc ark thai bore the faleofman upon Ihe walers of Ibc llodd, nnlil at last tht^y liavo been safely gai'nei-ed up in Ihe ripe and iVnilliil soil. To lake fi'oui the (>ai'lh this precious diamond tlust ami ]U)t reslore it, lo destroy Ihe |ii-ovidenlial uses of tluiso costly 14 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. products of all time, and so imperil man and his dominion, is it not a sin against the creation, is it not a forbidden thing, as truly as though the injunction had been graven on the tables of stone, and thundered from Sinai with the commandment, " Thou shalt not steal ?" Let an advancing morality teach our duty to the soil. It is but lately that the dumb and helpless brute was protected from the cruelty of man by the penalties of the criminal code. Let the appeal of a starved and emaciated soil touch the instructed conscience of civilized humanity. But whether the duty be recognized or not, the infraction of the law will bring its direful penalty. In the light of these considerations, it is not with unmixed satisfaction that we regard the progress of mechanical triumphs over the soil. We welcome, at a time when all the resources of the nation are needed, the accession of fifty million acres to the productive land of the country, that was made in the ten years of the last census ; and we rejoice in an increase of agricultural product, greatly outrunning the increase of population, accom- plished by means of improved agricultural implements and thousands of miles of additional railroad. But it is important, in connection with the consideration of the conditions of a per- manently prosperous agriculture, to call attention to the fact that these tremendous mechanical agencies, whose aggregate effect is so astounding, are so many mechanical advantages in accelerating the process of exhaustion. Using these powerful appliances, you pump the waters from the well no longer by hand, but with a steam-engine. The greater the yearly crop gathered, the greater the drain upon the fertilizing elements of the soil, and the sooner their limit is reached ; the more impor- tant, too, it becomes to find some counteractive tendency, which shall restore the equilibrium so injuriously disturbed by the deportations of the harvest. Let the processes of nature, ordained by that wisdom that was at the foundation of the world, direct our inquiry. Through- out her infinite domain to the remotest star, not an atom of matter, not a throb of force, even to the faintest vibration that pulsates in a ray of light is ever lost. The thunder that shakes the firmament, the lightning that rends the rock, the tornado that prostrates the forest, the convulsion that rocks the earth AGRICULTURE AND THE INDUSTRIAL ARTS. 15 and opens gaping scams which swallow up cities, are operations in which she but combines and rccombines her everlasting elements. An unending circle of self-adjusting change preserves forever tlie balance of her stupendous harmonies. Nothing loses a function except to gain one ; nothing comes to an end which is not a beginning. Every stage is a stage of transition. All things flow with the tide of time, and the current is continually returning upon itself. The trees grow old and at last decay ; their mould builds up the ascending columns of another wood. By the processes of growth, the dust of the earth is upraised in grains of wheat and corn. Wheat and corn, as food, are assim- ilated by the organisms of animal life. Upon man and bird and beast alike descends the inevitable decree, " Dust thou art, and unto dust thou slialt return ; " and so the cycle of transforma- tion is renewed. Where, then, among the forces of society, shall we seek the principle, whose operation shall harmonize with nature's grand economy, and be the basis of a system of agriculture that shall be perpetual and self-sustaining in the elements of a fertile soil ? The conscience of the individual is of too limited a scope to be trusted to decide upon grounds of permanent well-being, the issue in which present gain is met by a possible or prospective loss to unborn generations. This principle, if found, will be found most effectually established in the economy of the national industry, and so established that 'the present shall not be called to the difficult virtue of self-sacrifice, the resources of the future shall not be endangered, and the very working of the farm shall lay the foundation for still more abundant harvests. I find tlie hint of the principle souglit in that rule of good farming which enjoins the consumption upon the farm of the products of the farm, and the selection for the market, not of the hay and turnips, but the mutton and the beef. This economy, carried out upon a national scale, would give us a distributed home consumption of agricultural products, at diffused and accessible centres of a diversified mechanical and manufacturing industry, and of the commerce which such industry creates. For at these centres the fertilizing constituents of the harvest accumu- late. Rejected by the processes of consumption, still as suitable for the crop as when deposited by the last inundation, they become again available to all neighboring farms, to which they 16 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. are as truly the raw material of an agricultural product, as iron, cotton and wool to the machine-shop and the mill. The spread of cities like Lawrence throughout the land, with different industries adapted to local capabilities, will give to the agricul- ture of the nation the conditions of a self-sustaining, perpetually compensated and lasting fertility. The agriculture of China, that antedates the buried epochs of the Egyptian kings, and to-day flourishes and feeds the swarming millions of that empire, is based upon the principle that seeks from the' city restitution to the farm of what is taken from it by the harvest. Great as is the benefit which agriculture already derives from the neigh- borhood of centres of industry and commerce, it has hardly begun to use the resources which abound in such localities and should be made available. Li a true economy, the city and the town should be regarded by the farmer as a part of his farm domain. They are so by the laws of nature. They should be so in the practice of husbandry and the regulations of their police. The problem of utilitizing the sewage of cities, which is so earnestly discussed abroad, has vital relations to the progress of civilized states. Through the sewers of cities draining into rivers and the ocean, the highest properties of the soil are irre- coverably lost. The turbid currents of North River, the Thames and the Seine, .are richer than Pactolus with its sands of gold. For that which is pollution to 'their waters is the touch of magic to the fields, and the power of food for successive generations of men. The value of this material as a fertilizer is obvious, but it has been comparatively estimated and put beyond controversy by the experiments of the Prussian government in reclaiming land with the sewage of Dresden and Berlin. Land, which without any applications yielded but three to one from the seed sown, and seven to one when treated with the ordinary resources of the farm, yielded fourteen to one when fertilized from the sewer. As a mere problem of pecuniary saving it is a momen- tous one. The fertilizing portions of the sewage of the city of New York are computed, on the lowest estimate, to be worth seven million dollars per annum. We have authority for saying that the wasted drainage of the city of Boston is capable of restoring annually to a high condition thirty thousand acres of sterile land. The yearly waste of fertilizing elements in Great AGRICULTURE AND THE INDUSTRIAL ARTS. 17 Britain and Ireland are carefully computed at one hundred and forty million dollars. There is no direction in which ingenuity has of late been oftener or more effectively exercised in the industrial arts, than in contriving modes by which the dross, the shavings, the chips, all the unassimilated residues that remain after the completion of the main product, arc converted to some profitable use. But there is no problem to which the ingenious mind could turn itself with greater advantage, than that of utilizing sewage. The invention of a plan, by which the slime and sediment of cities may be transformed into corn and wheat for human sustenance and the vigor of the vegetating earth be perpetually renewed, gives scope for one of the most beneficent systems of economy ever devised. The revenues of a kingdom would be a cheap equivalent for such a plan ; the statesman, seeking for his country unfailing sources of prosperity ; the sanitary physician, striving to convert the fountains of disease and pestilence into fountains of life and strength ; the farmer, anxious to invigorate his exhausted lands ; the chemist, eager to give new proofs of the resources of his favorite science ; the engineer, who would render a public service, can afford to give this subject his deepest thought and care. The intimate connection that exists between the prosecution of the arts of mechanical and manufactuxing industry and the progress of a nation, needs no illustration in this city, county or Commonwealth. The theme is a familiar one. The annual manufactures of Massachusetts, valued at two hundred and sixty-six million dollars, and structures like these we see around us here, distributed throughout her borders, are works that manifest her sturdy faith. This faith she has cherished along with her love of knowledge and of freedom ; or rather these are the phases of her humane and earnest love of progress. In a diffused and .diversified national industry, and an exchange of its products by an unfettered domestic commerce, she has ever striven to establish tlie firm safeguards of independence, — union and liberty. How wisely she strove, how unwisely her counsels were neglected, let the witness be the mad rebellion that now rages ; which was nourished into being by the hope of aid from foreign states ; which seeks to destroy the Union, and to found an empire based on slavery ; and which began in the confident belief of its leaders that one single crop raised on Southern 3 18 . MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. plantations, and not equal in value to the loyal home-consumed hay crop of the North, would, nevertheless, in consequence of its abnormal relation to foreign manufactures and the exchanges of Northern commerce, bring the governments of the United States and Europe in submission to their feet. In this belief, when they raised the flag of treason they arrogantly proclaimed cotton to be king. To-day, Massachusetts with the bayonet debates on bloody fields the cause of independence, union and liberty. But it is the same cause which, on questions touching the national industry, she debated through the eloquence of a Webster and a Ghoate. And now, when the policy of national disorganization that has ruled and rioted in the land so many years has culminated in revolt, the first resource of the nation, with which it seeks to invigorate and combine its abused and dissipated strength, is the encouragement of the national indus- try. The prosecution of a gigantic war upon the principles of a sound financial policy calls for large annual revenues ; such a course is necessary to maintain the national credit, and, in the case of an inconvertible currency, to prevent depreciation and the rise of prices. These needed revenues the government derives in largest measure from manufactures. The develop- ment of manufactures, such as can be made to take root by a temporary adjustment of tariff and excise, naturally becomes and has become a part even of the revenue policy of the nation. Accordingly, the country is sprouting with new growths of mechanical and manufacturing industry. Let them cover the land. Let villages and towns, the centres of these imperial and liberalizing arts, multiply and increase, to develop a progressive and prosperous agriculture, to deepen the foundations and quicken the life of society, to distribute the benefits of skilled labor reinforced by an iron-armed machinery, and increased in productiveness a hundred fold, to establish the union of the crop of the farm and the labor of the neighboring factory, foun- dry, or furnace in ultimate products, which shall become the staples of a pervading domestic commerce at the lowest cost of making exclianges ; such a commerce as has been recognized since Adam Smith declared the principles of the wealth of nations as the most profitable to communities and states. So knit the fibres and harden the sinews of the national strength. Science has callud attention to the general fact that tlie simple sub- • AGRICULTURE AND THE INDUSTRIAL ARTS. 19 stances of which all material things are composed do not, except in combinations with each other, enter into or influence the organic growth of plants. So in the social economy, not the isolation of the farmer or the manufacturer, but the union of both gives the needful element of social organization. Let England strain every nerve to gain and hold possession of the markets of mankind with her vast and world-embracino" CD system of manufactures and commerce, and let her strive with equal effort to feed from her garden patch the millions whom she thus employs ; and so doing, let her teach the docile nations to devote themselves exclusively to the ciilture of the earth, and persuade whom she may. We will observe her practice, and draw our precepts for ourselves ; and hail " The rise of empire and of arts." 20 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. THE IJSrTERESTS OF AGRICULTURE. From an Address before the Middlesex North Agricultural Society BY JOHN A. GOODWIN. We have higher motives than ever for striving to elevate our various callings, and to render our New England homes more prosperous and attractive. What can be done to advance the interests of agriculture in particular, that being the base of the industrial column — the foundation art, from "whose wants and desires all other pursuits and professions spring ? In selecting a topic from so wide a field I can hardly hope to choose that which may seem to all the most desirable. For instance : — a friend I see here from Billerica, may think that I ought to hold him up to censure, and prove tliat he deserves no premiums from the Society's funds, because he tolerated so many scores of caterpillars' nests this year on his apple-trees and worthless wild cherry-trees along his wall, that his orchard looked as if a fire had passed over it, and vermin enough had been produced for the destruction of all the orchards in his neighborhood, next year. He is right — he, and all like him, ought to be cut off for a year from premiums and good- standing here, but I must leave him to the gnawings of the caterpillar of conscience. Another friend, from Dracut, may think that I am about to argue against his right to even a gratuity on his fine articles exhibited, because he allows a plantation of thistles to fringe the highway all along his land, where I saw them scattering their seed for next year's crop, by the thousand over his farm, and by the ten thousand over the farms of his neighbors. Now this friend, too, is right in supposing that he and all who are guilty of the like offence ought to be held up, on occasions like this, as very bad examples, but I must dismiss them with the THE INTERESTS OF AGRICULTURE. 21 wish that they were compelled to sleep upon the thistles they raise, until by united effort the vile weeds were banished to their native Canada to comfort the long-cared gentry gon6 thither to escape the draft ! Neither will I talk about that man of Chelmsford — a disciple of Nimrod — who to save a few extra cherries, shot all the robins and woodpeckers about his premises, tearing the twigs off his trees with the shot more than two years' growth will repair, and breaking the law at the same time. In this case, the subsequent bugs and cut-worms convinced the offender of his ungrateful folly, and no gratuity that we can pay would induce him again to slay his feathered benefactors. Perhaps the trustees of our society may expect a discourse upon their policy of offering premiums for blooded bulls, and also for those doubtful quadrupeds called native bulls, thus rewarding one man for introducing good blood among our stock, and rewarding another man for adulterating the same blood when it has been introduced ! Although I think the society thus commits a greater bull than any in its pens, I will not stop to express an opinion. No — caterpillar-raisers, thistle-distributors, bird-murderers, and blood-debasers — though right in thinking you ought to be talked about, I must pass you by. That thoughtfulness of your committee, of which I spoke, prevents, and it is this : when they extended their late but imperative invitation, they said that twenty minutes would be long enough to speak, and that I must not on any account take over half an hour ! So having con- sumed a fair portion of my allowance in preliminaries — in skirmishing around the outposts — I will devote the remainder of it to the idea I have, that the great want of agriculture among us is, a large increase of farms and a much thicker farming population. I know the idea is that our section of country is about full, and that young persons wishing a farm should go to the West. Yet of the 42,000,000 acres in New England only 19,000,000 are occupied, and only two-thirds of even this space is what is called improved — that is used for pasturage, tillage, and grass, or for building purposes. So, less than one-third of New England is improved, and not one-half is occupied for any purpose. 22 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. In our old farming county, where all the land is " occupied," there are 220,000 acres " improved " and 128,000 acres unim- proved. Suppose one-half of this unimproved land to be unfit for anything but wood, we still have enough left to make 1,000 additional farms of 56 acres each. A large part of this land embraces swamps and pond-holes, surrounded by light soils. The drainage of the former and the exchange of a part of their contents, with the arid uplands about them, would yield some of the best soils in the county. This subject is much talked about, I know, and not a little has been done, but the thing has hardly begun in earnest. To see what other people do, take the case of Harlem Lake in Holland, which lake was thirty-three miles in circumference. Some sixteen years ago the government commenced pumping it out by steam-power. At the end of four years the work was done, and the State had gained 44,500 acres of rich land at a cost of 180.69 per acre. This tract is now divided into farms of 49|- acres each, and it is estimated in time to support 70,000 people, or twice the population of Lowell. Such an undertaking as this cannot be expected in our region, but the case is interesting as showing whatsis thought profitable by the sluggish, money-loving Dutchman. In our county, however, are many small waste tracts, amounting to thousands of acres, which would pay for under-draining, even at the cost per acre of pumping out Harlem Lake. Then these swamps and low places are great reservoirs of manure. For 4,500 years the humus of the uplands has been finding its way to the lower levels, leaving the soil impoverished. It is the part of agriculture to restore the loss. Dr. Dana has demonstrated this in his profound and excellent work, the " Muck Manual," a popularized edition of which should be in the hands of every farmer and gardener, and should be distri- buted by our society in place of many of its smaller cash pre- miums and gratuities. He there shows us that a cord, of peat, muck, or of pond mud, mixed with one-third of a bushel of salt and one-third of a cask of lime, make a compost as valuable as a cord of stable manure, and at one-tliird of the cost. He adds these words, which, coming from so high an authority, should be emblazoned on the walls of our hall : — " Nature never THE INTERESTS OF AGRICULTURE. 23 bestowed upon man, soil of greater capability of being made lastingly fertile , than the sandy light soil of Neiv England!^' My friend, Dr. Lariiig, of Salem, who happily combines theo- retical, practical, and remunerative farming, found himself, three years ago, short of manure. He accordingly got o\it one hundred and seventy cords of muck from a swamp, and mixing one hundred casks of lime, put it in little heaps to freeze through the winter. In the spring, after thorough mixing, it had become excellent manure, costing him when spread, not fifty cents a cord, besides the original getting out. With this dressing and some small additions, he raised seventy-live bushels of corn to the acre, and left his land in good heart for future operations. In Maine, many cultivators have adopted Dr. Dana's method of making manure, so that farms, where few animals are kept, continually increase in richness, at a small expense. But this operation is oiily half the work needed here. For every cord brought from the low ground, one or two should be carried back, giving muck composts to the uplands and sandy composts to the lowlands. Thus, year by year, over even our most obscure hills and valleys, the area of cultivation may expand. Nature yielding more and more of her bounty to a constantly improving skill and an increasing population. But we have another store of fertility neglected, that is immense. The 220,000 acres of improved land in Middlesex County are divided into 4,300 farms. Most of these are three- storied. The five inches nearest the surface form the first story ; the five inches next below are the second ; the five or ten inches next under that make the third. Now statistics show, and good farmers assure me that they are correct, that in this county, and in the whole State, the average depth of ploughing is only five inches. Thus, while we improve only two-thirds the surface of Old Middlesex, we improve only one- third the depth. To make room for more farms, the easiest and best-paying way is to shorten the length and breadth of the present farm, and increase its thickness. Agriculture is an exception to the general rule, and thrives the more as you run it into the ground ! Good farmers admit this doctrine so generally that 24 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. it may seem a waste of time to dwell upon it. Here is the trouble — they admit the doctrine in full, but do not admit the ploughshare half-way. Just twenty-four years ago, a Boston house imported from England the first subsoil plough ever in this country. Yankee skill soon changed the heavy, costly thing into a series of ploughs calculated for all work and for all teams, from one horse to four horses or oxen. These subsoil ploughs, following the common plough in the same furrow, go down into the third story of the farm, not turning up the subsoil but shaking and pulverizing it, so that all three stories of tlie farm are opened to the warmth of the sun, the softening of the rain, and the purification of the air, with the myriads of plant-roots following in their wake. Of course, if the subsoil is sand and gravel, or mostly rock, the work may be overdone, but in every other case the deeper the cultivation, with manure in proportion, the better the farming, and curiously enough, the freer the land from wet in moist seasons, and the freer it is from drought in dry ones. Now, my hearers may say — " We knew all this beforcj better than you!" Exactly so! But if you A;woi^ it, why don't you c?o it? Why are subsoil ploughs so nearly unknown in so many of the towns in our society's limits, and the soil tilled by merely scratching the surface — or by what may be called skim-milk farming? Why is no premium offered by our society for sub- soil ploughing, or some recognition made at our exhibitions that it is even desirable to stir the soil beyond the regulation depth of the ploughing match? For many generations the air and sun have been trying to ameliorate the subsoils of North Middlesex, and the corn and grass-roots, more enterprising than their owners, have vainly sought to pierce its clays and hard- pans in search of plant-food for their benefit and ours, but you would not aid them with the steel fingers that alone can do the work. You will often see, both in city and country, a mansion of which the best part is made into a parlor, furnished more expensively than all the house beside, but kept continually shut with close blinds and curtains, and a strong smell of mildew pervading the dark and solemn silence. Let the clergyman THE INTERESTS OF AGRICULTURE. . 25 make his brief summer call and one blind is for a few moments set ajar, while he rests himself in a luxurious but mouldy chair. At length comes Tlianksgiving, and the parlor is fairly opened, the only day in the year, perhaps; and when the mould is rubbed off, the dampness dried out, and the moist chimney has done smoking and begins to draw, the room for that short day seems like a habitable and even cheerful place, but on the morrow relapses into grim solitude. To think of such a room is melancholy. But how much more melancholy is it to think of the deserted second and third stories of the farm, just spoken of — the spacious and valuable, but never visited parlors of the soil. Into their moist darkness no parochial visit introduces a chance ray of sunshine, and no festival, even once a year, cheers the richly furnished recesses with warmth and life. Now there are a few subsoil ploughs owned by members of this society, and there are some as good farmers present to-day as can well be found. When our friends, the clergy, rebuke the evil of staying away from church, they have to address them- selves to the faithful few who have come to church, and to whom therefore the censure does not apply. So in decrying poor cultivation, I have to speak to you^ who are mostly right already, and to whom my remarks may seem like a last year's almanac — old news and dry reading. Still, it does not seem to be generally realized that it is easier to raise sixty bushels of corn on one acre than on two, provided the land is worth planting at all, and what is true of this crop is true of others, corn being a convenient type. The last returns showed that the average yield of corn in Massachusetts was twenty-eight and a half bushels, and in Middlesex County twenty-nine. Good farmers say that twice as deep ploughing, with more manure and cultivation, would certainly double this. Thus, our farmers can get as large crops from half their land as from the whole, and save much in hoeirig, carting, vhich is little short of that of creation ; the feeling that one has made land do its share toward the support of civiliz- ation, renders the making of soil thus easily, infinitely better than the seeking it ready made. Tlie soil of New England is hilly and stony, thin and sandy ; but it has. done its fair share toward the agricultural reputation of the nation. There arc better farmers in New England to-day, than in more favored portions of the country. They are not generally men of one idea. The various kinds of crops their farms produce, drive them out of that, and they generally know more or less of the theory of rotation of crops, deep and ♦While in exile, the Emperor was asked why he paid so much Mention to the study of books on draining. " I am fitting myself to become Emperor of France," said he, "and one of my first acts shall be to drain tiie marshes of Salone," and so it was. • 32 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. shallow ploughing, application of fertilizers, iinderdraining, &c. These things are of very little interest to the farmers of the West, who cultivate their specialities, and whose soil will produce a crop, provided the seed is sown. The hills of Worcester County produce better butter and cheese than the hills of Ayr. The soil of Cambridge better pears than France the home of pears. Hovey's Seedling, the result of careful horticultural science, originated there to be known beyond the Atlantic ; and the Hubbardston Nonesuch, Roxbury Russet, and Rhode Island Greening are household words. There is no better latitude than that from Boston through to the lakes, for the growth of apples. Exporters say that apples produced there are less liable to decay. Very much farther north, the seasons are too short, and much farther south, they are too long. The trees grow to wood, form too few fruit spurs, and store too little starch, gum, and sugar, for the support of blossoms the ensuing year. Thoreau says in the '^ Atlantic Monthly": "The trees of New England embrace all the most valuable kinds on the continent. I never have a botanical specimen sent to me, but I am sure to find something like it in my rambles ; and I even expect to find the Victoria regia, on Concord River." But what must be done to arrest the decay which in many places is going on ; which, while the land around our cities is becoming a garden, is blighting some country neighborhoods. What must be done to keep the sons of New England on. their native soil ; who now yield to the allurements of the fertile West ; pour into cities, or adopt any other pursuit rather than cultivate their native fields ? In farming there has been too great a strain upon the mus- cles, and too little upon the brain ; too much physical, and too little intellectual labor. The muscles have become stiffened, while the brain has suffered by inactivity. Says Channing: " Manual labor is a great good, but in so saying I must be understood to speak of labor in its just proportions. In excess it docs great harm. It is not as good when made the sole work of life. It must be joined to high means of improvement, or it degrades instead of exalting. " Man has a various nature which requires a variety of occu- pations and discipline for its growth. Study, meditation. THE SOIL OF NEW ENGLAND. 33 society, relaxation, should be mixed up with his physical toils. He has intellect, heart, imagination, taste, as well as bones and muscles, and he is grievously wronged when compelled to exclu- sive drudgery for bodily subsistence." We have had too much art and too little science. Farming has been too empirical. We have been guided by a sort of independent empiricism, rather than by enlightened- science. Not that a well instituted experiment for deciding any particular point should be disjjar- aged, but life should not be all experiment. Too many of our farmers toward the close of life, look back upon their earlier efforts as having been guided by a policy essentially bad. "Time and capital," says Liebig, " are wasted in experiments." A few successful results, cannot establish a reliable rule. We have decried the long experience of scientific men, called it " book knowledge," " impractical," forgetting that these very theories are the result of practice, and that our own practice has a theory to it. The mechanic, receiving "the data and formulae of forces and agencies as true, works straight forward to a result, the truth of which he does not doubt. The farmer, though the laws governing the growth of a blade of corn, more impenetrable perhaps, but not more unreal, are as old as the world, is slower to receive them — the laws of motion Are no more certain and fixed than those of chemical affinities ; the binomial theorei\i no more a fixed fact, than that gypsum (svilphate of lime) when sown upon land, will react upon the ammonia in the air. Therefore, agriculture, which supports all, has been slow to take its stand among the sciences. Boys, deeming agriculture the lowest of arts, the meanest of vocations, have sought the professions ; the ministry, but have been forced to turn to the woods and fields for their noblest, sublimest lessons ; the study of medicine, but in their study of chemistry, have come to find themselves better farmers than ever, and discover that a better remedy than any in the whole pharmacopeia, is the healthful exercise which out-door labor gives. It is a pity that the beauties of farming should be better seen from other stand-points, than the one the farmer himself occu- pies ; that they who are shut up inside four walls of city brick, should know more of chemistry, botany, mineralogy, cnto- . 6 34 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. mology, than those whose daily occupation brings them so much in contact with these sciences ; that through their distant and casual glimpses, they should lAiow more of the book of nature, than those before whom its pages lie constantly open. The agricultural college will do something toward remedying this. It will be a guiding light, a starting point, a repository where all that is known of tillage shall be embalmed ; which shall elevate the mind to its proper sphere in farming ; which shall be a place where men may make sure use of the experience of the past, as stepping-stones toward something higher. It is not our purpose to enter into any argument for agricultural col- leges, but it seems that New England, with her mixed crops, her soil so undeveloped and so capable of development, will absorb them into her educational system with alacrity. They may educate men away from the plough, but they need not do so. If a boy is to become a merchant, he prepares himself not only practically, by an education gained in the counting-room, but also in the broad principles of the law, and political economy. The lawyer must become versed in jurisprudence, ere he dares trust himself at the bar. The physician must get deep into pharmaceutics and pathology ; and one by one almost all civil- ians have been dropped, during this war, from the roll of high military officers. To-day, what men seemed to doubt at first, is plain, that 'men who have studied the theory of war deeply, are best military leaders. But the agriculturist has generally been forced to pick up his knowledge as best he could, at the plough, in the newspapers, and by dear experience. Scientific farming has been brought into great disrepute by its votaries, or those who pretend to be such. Some of these might be called amateurs, anything but scientific farmers. Many of these try to till the soil on the strength of theory alone, and fail. The large expenses incurred, and the small results obtained by these, have caused men to shun anything which savored of science. Many of these having large fortunes, have tilled the soil for show, pleasure, and experiment, rather than profit. There are others who have farmed for a livelihood, but ignorant either of the theory or practice of farming, have seized upon a hobby, and in following it, have set at naught the rules of economy and judgment. Tliese hobbies have led them to cultivate crops unsuitable to their localities. THE SOIL OF NEW ENGLAND. 35 Grass is the principal crop in New England ; the cattle, beef, and grain we raise, are accessaries ; and any departnre from a policy favoring the production of grass, except in localities warranting a change, is a loss. We sow our grain that the land may become regenerated for the ensuing crop of grass. We cannot compete with the West in raising corn. A pound of beef raised here costs more than a pound brought from there ; and a horse raised in Massachusetts, costs twice what one costs raised in Vermont. Investing in fancy fertilizers, has almost ruined the fortunes and the farms of some. Our bogs lie much nearer than Peru, and by adding alkalies their humus becomes soluble. It is a pity, besides being a proof of bad judgment, to let our resources run to waste, A farmer who lets his manure heaps dry up in air, the ammonia fly off to benefit another man's growing crops, while he incurs heavy expenses in buying fancy fertilizers, must make up his mind to poor success. Guano is the opium of tillage, producing illusive and dazzling results, but exhausting the productive capacity of the soil, by means of its alkalies. We have in mind a farmer, scientific, and yet economical and practical, who tills the soil scientifically and profitably ; who culls from the jarring evidence of the experience of others, all that worth preserving ; who makes the rules of nature his own, gathering up all, so that nothing is lost, and into whose business the capital of thought enters largely. The agricultural college cannot, it is true, give men common sense where that is wanting ; but it may help give an impulse, a zest to a pursuit, which has been so unattractive to so many ; teach the farmer to appreciate the dignity of his position, as owner of his domain in fee simple ; keep the sons of farmers upon their native fields, and tend to staunch this hermorrhage. But not to colleges alone must we look for a remedy. The majority of our farmers must serve out a long apprenticeship at the plough and the hoe. Thought must be called in to our aid. " Labor becomes a new thing when thought is thrown into it, when the mind keeps pace with the hands." We must learn the why, as well as the hoiv. We are acquainted with the plough as an implement of art ; it also has a scientific aspect. The sons of farmers must be fascinated with beauties sur- rounding their toils, of which they never dreamed. The fields 36 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. must be tilled intelligently, and not blindly. The more we know of how God works, the better will be our own success and delight. Let the farmer become a man of taste ; let his house contain a library ; let him become familiar with the microscope and the wonders it unfolds ; let his grounds be taste- fully laid out — taste, like civility, costs little. Even laying stone-wall might be pleasant, and we might forget our thin- worn fingers, when it will contribute toward adorning our homesteads. We know a tasteful farmer, who is laying a fine face-wall in front of his house. An awkwardly-shaped cavity in it remains unfilled, until a nicely-fitting stone is dug from his fields. He fulfills a double purpose ; his wall .becomes beautiful and his fields smooth. We are influenced imperceptibly by our surroundings. The face of the country, whether hilly or flat, has a vast influence on the character of its inhabitants.* The manner in which our homes are adorned, has a great influence on their inmates. The child commences its education before it can talk ; and unattractive surroundings bear a strong, early and constant influence, toward educating boys away from the plough. The farmer stamps his character upon his fields and home, in unmis- takable hand-writing. By the arrangement of his hedges, orchards, shrubbery and shade trees, he makes landscape. He is a painter in living colors. He has a pleasant or an unpleasant home, almost as he pleases. Taste is consistent generally, with good judgment ; and the practice of it does not require wealth, or a high education. Smooth fields are more productive than rough ones, and a taste- fully arranged farm will sell for much more than one upon which less taste has been shown. There has been very little expense incurred in making this difference ; a little thought has been expended ; a plan worked out, formed perhaps, while others were idle. We are idle for an hour ; we might have planted a tree which would have made us happier for a lifetime. Not every tree is useless which does not bear tangible fruit. We admire the taste of our ancestors, who planted the elms before our doors. They have been bearing the fruit of joy and * A writer says that aflat country produces ^a< heads. Byron is said to have owed his poetical proclivities to a residence in youth among the Scottish Mountains. THE SOIL OF NEW ENGLAND. 37 beauty a liimdred years. The cherries and apples please our coarser tastes ; these our more refined sensibilities. The Washington Elm has borne fruit as well as the Stuyve- sant Pear-tree. Let the farm be a place to live upon, and not a machine to run for a limited period, out of which to wring a living. Let it be such a place, with such attractions, that its sons when called off to other pursuits, may look back upon the time spent in the old homestead as the happiest part of their lives ; that the ship- wrecked sailor may cling more hopefully to his plank, remem- bering it ; that the merchant may keep a vision of it before his mind, unobscured by those of wealth and gain, and in the evening of his life may wander back to beautify with his fortune his early home. 38 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. THE EDUCATION OF THE OX. From an Essay delivered before the Worcester North Agricultural Society. BY A. B. DAVIS, OF SHIRLET. " Their strength, or speed, or Tigilance, were given In aid of our defects." — Cowper. The employment of the term " Education," I am aware, implies knowledge and a certain capability of moral progression ; but it might as well be at once understood that, while taking issue with this position, I recognize and accept the implication of truth, in the remark attributed to Sidney Smith, that " there is no other animal but man to whom mind appears to be given for any other purpose than the preservation of the body." Twenty years' experience with beasts of burden, has put me in possession of facts which prove them susceptible of education and moral improvement to a degree considerably outrunning the popular apprehension. To elucidate these facts and call attention to a new source of good and pecuniary wealth to the agriculturist, is the object of this paper. Of course it is not practicable to give the full modus operandi of training upon the basis of the positions assumed, but I hope by originality of treatment to awaken interest in a science which must, I am persuaded, form no ■unimportant branch of the practically progressive farmer's education. Much of the maltreatment to which domestic animals are subject, is owing to ignorance of the true conditions of suc- cessful management; but I propose to urge the discipline of animals solely on the score of economy, leaving out of view, for the present, the moral aspect of the case. Pecuniary profit we suppose to be the farmer's object in the breeding and rearing of animals. Let us see. A man breeds and rears a pair of steers for ordinary farm work. Other things being equal, a pair THE EDUCATION OF THE OX. 39 " trained up in tlie way they should go," would not attain greater size than if left in natural and lawless freedom ; but symmetrical development and ease of management being deside- rata with New England teamsters, early and judicious training becomes a pecuniary consideration. The sine qui non of successful ox-training involves the follow- ing conditions : 1st, likeness of temperament and dispositioi^; and 2d, equality of size, strength, and age. These conditions are placed in the order of their importance. Many a poor beast is made to suffer a kind of martyrdom from being " unequally yoked " by his ignorant master. And, as a teamster of some experience, I feel warranted in affirming my belief that no small number of our class become martyrs to the ignorance above mentioned. The hired teamster being required to perform a certain amount of work, he is not at liberty to correct any vices or defects in the team given him, but must worry through his time, often under the most trying circumstances. " It is hard learning old dogs new tricks," and none are more likely to appreciate the significance of this proverb than teamsters placed in situations where they have to deal with ill-bred, mis-matched, and vicious animals. Where the standard of " education " is unworthily low, people are wont to regard all reformatory efforts as Utopian, and not likely to promote their interests in any direction. But what are the facts ? Comparing trained with untrained cattle, the former will command, in the general market, from five to twenty-five dollars more per yoke than the latter. And in localities where beauty and facility of management go at their maximum price, the difference is greater. The common remark with intelligent buyers is — " Money is no object — we are willing to pay for cattle that are well matched, smart, and handy." But there are minor advantages growing out of judicious discipline which are not so readily apprehended, and which are not so easily made appreciable. I will notice a few of the most prominent. One fair resultant — and which will be readily granted — is the facility of movement acquired in the process of training. One of the most common wheel conveyances in use upon the farm is the ox-cart ; and it is no inconsiderable point of ecou- ,"!f 40 MASSi?LCHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. omy to be able to change cattle off and on to this vehicle easily and rapidly. In busy seasons, what is the advantage of smart- ness and dexterity in a hired man, if the farmer cannot make it available through his team, with which the man is so con- stantly required to operate ? Among all the varied positions in which wagons and carts require to be placed, there- often exists the necessity of " backing ; " and none but the best trained cattle are able to execute this manceiwre with facility. Indeed, an acquaintance with working cattle extending over a period of twenty years, has failed to furnish a single instance of a pair perfect in this, respect, who were not the subjects of constant and persistent training and use, from calves upioard to four years old. Almost every farm barn thirty years ago was con- structed so that " backing in " was often necessary, and yet few oxen of that day were capable of doing it. In the majority of cases where such a manmivre became necessary, the oxen were taken off the " spear " or tongue, and brought "right abou.t face," to push or shove the load in. This is always a difficult operation, requiring considerable time, and one can readily perceive the economy of discipline, which enables the farmer to back any load his cattle are able to draw. But the advantages of discipline in draft are not less apparent, whether in cases where " a long pull, a strong pull, and a pull together " is • requisite; or where an ox's entire strength is needed for a single spring or lift, (as in turning a large stone,) the superiority of the trained ox is so marked as to impress every impartial and unprejudiced witness. With such there is no " baulking," the common causes of it being removed. Cattle, properly mated, will generally pull together, and generally all they can, if their driver so signifies ; and though his judgment may be at fault, it is very seldom, indeed, that they would get abused, or be required to pull a third time. With mis-mated cattle, it often happens that one is spirited and ambitious, while the other is "slow-moulded," and easily discouraged in a bad place. Such a pair, in the hands of a hasty-tempered, injudicious man, soon becomes worthless for most kinds of labor. The energetic, " high-strung " ox after a time gets discour- aged from liaving to receive much of the whipping which his mate deserves, and much ill-treatment which neither of them THE EDUCATION OF THE OX. 41 deserves. But, perhaps, the most marked distinction hetween trained and untrained oxen is observable upon the road. Speed and endurance are qualities valued in cattle designed for haul- ing and "holding back" upon New England roads. All the varied minutiee of superior training are requisite here, and some of them' may be seen in the best light. But, perhaps, I have made the desirableness of thorough, judicious training sufficiently apparent without further illustration ; and, grasping at the hope lodged in that " perhaps," I take courage to assert that a yoke of educated os:en, (other things being equal,) will perform one-third more work with one-fourth less " wear and tear," than a pair only trained up to the common standard. Besides this there is the -physical and moral effect upon the driver, which is above pecuniary price. Re-asserting what appears in the first part of my paper, viz. : that likeness of disposition and equality of size and strength are indispensable conditions, I proceed to some practical hints on the early training of animals adapted to farm labor. While urging the propriety of early matching and training, I feel bound to state what appears to be the only objection to such a course ; viz. : the risk of a dissimilar development, either in point of size, strength, organization, or temper — in the process of growth. And as some security against such a risk, the employment of a sagacious, experienced person in the selection of calves, presents itself as a suggestion worthy of adoption. The farmer must expect to give himself some trouble at the outset, and will often find it necessary to search among the herds of his acquaintances, at a considerable expense of time ; and when successful must not grudge what may seem a sum out of proportion to what his experience may suggest as the maximum return. Having selected and brought his calves together, let them be kept so during the entire period of train- ing. The manner of rearing calves I shall not discuss, not deeming it relevant to the subject of this essay; if, however, they be well kept, their size and strength at three months will admit of their being yoked and exercised in some of the more simple movements — such as turning each way; starting and halting at command ; backing, and "holding up;" "standing out" and "standing up," separately, &c., &c. In all these primary exercises, tlie experienced teamster sees the chief 6 42 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. advantages of early training. At this stage animals are supple and docile, and the ivhip almost finds its " occupation gone," — £lt least there is no need of severity. One of the most difficult branches of the science may then be taught with assurance of complete success. The art of backing, properly, is seldom taught, and more seldom acquired. Regarding this subject of " backing," I beg leave to submit a few illustrations. An ill-founded notion seems to have possessed the minds of not a few farmers and teamsters, touching the ability of the ox to force a load back by the horns. To this prejudice I attribute the general failure of working cattle in this particular. It is, however, an easily demonstrated fact that Nature has lodged more strength in the neck and head of the ox, than in his breast and shoulders. This is patent to the most casual observation of bulls and oxen when Jjghting. The size and strength of the horns of the ox also favor this view. In some parts of Europe this principle seems to be better understood : hence we find the ox and the cow appropriately harnessed for draft by the horns, and executing their tasks with apparent ease. Having exercised sufficiently without draft, let the calves then be hitched to a miniature cart or wagon and be instructed in all the manoeuvres required of oxen. At first the load should be light, and when backing, care should be taken not to injure the embryo horns. At this point, too, let the " sidewise move- ment " receive some attention. As this movement is not gener- ally understood, I will describe it as well as I may, verbally. Every teamster who understands his business knows that one of the best tests of superior training is to be found in the manner in which a pair of cattle approach and place them- selves astride a cart-spear or tongue. None save those most thoroughly drilled can do it handsomely. When approaching the cart the " nigh " ox should be made to gradually place himself parallel to the spear, (the " off" one following suit,) and when sufficiently near, should step sidewise, (his fore and hind legs simultaneously,) over the spear. Tliis is rather difficult of execution, and should be taught prior to any requirement of use. In other words, let cattle be taught to move " sideways " squarely, to and from the driver, as if on parade. This movement once taught, is of incalculable value THE EDUCATION OF THE OX. 43 in all multiform exercises of ox-labor. The same rule reversed will apply when approaching the spear from the left hand. Perhaps in this place I should indicate my preference among the ivhips known to teamsters. In some parts of Worcester County drivers use a whip made of common shoemaker's thread, by means of a very simple machine, which any farmer's boy can construct. This cord, which is very hard and stiff, and of uniform size, is looped on to the stock, and " let out " as it wears up. For cheapness, durability, and efficiency, I know of no whip to compare with it, and yet I hesitate to recommend its general use, for the reason that it can be made too harmful. It is an error to suppose that an ox-whip should be either large or long : the stock may be a few inches over three feet — the lash about six inches shorter. Such a whip can be easily flour- ished, and will inflict greater punishment when required, than one much larger. In the manner of castigation as. a means of breaking and governing refractory animals, it is not easy to draw the line between " a necessary act," which Cowper says " incurs no blame," and severity which would be obnoxious to the charge of cruelty. As I cannot dwell at length upon this most vital question, I must content myself with stating, and briefly illustrating, the great governing principle, which is — recognition of the intelligence, apprehensiveness, docility, and dignity of the animal. Farmers ! let never a wanton or wicked blow be struck, nor a harsh, unmeaning sound be made ; let nothing be done at the instance of mere caprice, or passion ; cause all persons in any way employed with your teams to recognize and regard this principle. If, after sufficient trial, an animal proves incorrigible, by every principle of morality, by every consideration of wisdom and economy, release him from the yoke forever. It often hap- pens that a man possesses an odd steer which he thinks too handsome to kill, and so sets himself to find a " mate." If such a steer at the age of three years old proves, on trial, turbulent and ugly-natured, it will be nearly an impossibility to break him into sobriety and usefulness. There is so much wildness, will, and muscle about steers that have run till three years old, that the task of breaking them is a formidable one, and not generally advisable. 44 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. After cattle have been taught to " lay up " close to the spear when backing, they should constantly be required to place themselves right, before attempting the exercise, and should be looked after while performing. In this place, I would caution drivers against a common error — the practice of going before cattle to back them. Oxen thus treated never perform the operation handsomely. While backing, the driver should keep a little back rather than forward of the ox's middle, as there is a tendency to "wing out " when handling a heavy load. When using a cart or wagon upon the farm, and especially around barns, or in the door yards, the teamster should never ride, er allow any one else thus employed to do so. This common practice is fatal to the discipline of trained cattle. The driver should walk steadily by their side, not often using the whip, nor speaking in any but a firm, distinct manner, and manifesting- chiefly by motion, his will. In the matter of ox-yokes my experience has not failed to impress me with the need of a revolution — most of those in common use being too heavy, " bungling," and every way inconvenient. These remarks specially apply to those made by Nourse, Mason & Co. Indeed, I have met with but very few of unexceptionable pattern, and those were manufactured in a part of Worcester County where ox-training is carried to a point much nearer perfection than in any other locality of which I have knowledge. FARMS. 45 F A H M S . ESSEX. From the Report of the Committee. We have had but one entry for the premium this year — that of S. A. Merrill, the occupant of the Derby Farm, in South Salem. We think this is the first time, in the history of this society, that a person who has leased a farm has offered it for a premium. The committee visited the farm on the 11th day of July, at which time the grass was cut and most of it in the barn. We noticed the fields were very smoothly mown, and raked clean, and the hay appeared to be of good quality. The general appearance of the crops indicated that they were well planted and cultivated thoroughly. The fences and buildings were in about as good condition as we expect to find on a farm that has been let for many years. Some of the committee think the society ought not to give a premium to any farm having such poor fences and buildings ; others think the tenant could not be expected to expend much in repairing and keeping in order the fences, and if his management in other respects was judicious, he ought not to be deprived of the premium on account of neglecting that which belonged to the owners to do. The farm was visited by part of the committee on the 19th of September. At that time it looked as well as we expected to find it. Although we have seen some farms where the weeds were kept down better, yet we have seen many more that were not kept so clean. Mr. Merrill has given his attention mostly to raising vegetables for the market, and he has been very suc- cessful in this. This he thinks more profitable than making milk. Our impression is, that if his cows had received more of his attention they would have done better, though we think that milk can be produced cheaper farther from the city, where land is not so valuable. The yield of milk appears small to us, compared with the other products of the farm. According to 46 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. his statement his cows did not average four quarts per day each for the seven best months of the year for making milk. The committee, when they visited the farm, were satisfied that a very large amount of produce was raised for the amount of labor expended ; and when we notice the price at which the* early vegetables were sold, we saw more distinctly than we ever realized before, the advantages which the market gardener derives from his hot-beds. We regret that Mr. Merrill, in giving his statement of the farm, has followed so far the example of those, who, for the past few years, have made statements of their farming in our transactions. Where the hay and roots are consumed on the farm, in making up the account, these should not be reckoned. What we wish to know is the income. In the society's offer for premium on farms they say — " For the best conducted and most improved Farm, taking into view the entire management and cultivation, including lands, build- ings, fences, orchards, crops, stock and all other appendages, with statements in detail relating thereto." We think Mr. Merrill has improved the farm much, and for this improvement and his skill and success in raising vegetables for the market, we award to him the first premium of thirty dollars. Wm. R. Putnam, /or the Committee. Estimate of receipts and expenditure on the farm, made up by the committee from Mr. Merrill's statement : — The rent of the farm annually, . Part taxes, ...... Wages of 7 men at $20.00 per month, for 7 months. Board of 7 men at $4.00 per week, Wages and board of two boys for 7 months. Paid boys for weeding onions, . Wages and board of three men in winter, . Wages and board of milkman for one year, Paid for fish-guano for manure, Paid for grain, Blacksmitli's bill, ..... The interest, on cost, and depreciation of hot-beds. Interest on value of carriages and farm imple- ments, ........ 180 00 $1,000 00 30 00 980 00 840 00 306 00 54 00 564 00 448 00 140 00 600 00 600 00 60 00 $100 00 76 00 45 00 12 00 FARMS. • 47 "Wear of same, ....... Interest on value of 32 cows, at -$40. 00 each. Interest on value of 5 horses, at -$150.00 each, . Interest on value of one pair of oxen. Total, $5,510 00 We think we can form a better estimate of the real income of the farm if we suppose it continued through the year as a milk farm. In that case we deduct the hay and roots from the income, and add the sale of the milk at the rate of the other seven months. Taking these figures as our data, we find the sales of farm to be . . . . . . $11,649 49 And the expenses to be, . . . . . 5,510 00 $6,139 49 Leaving six thousand dollars for the services and support of Mr. Merrill and his family. Statement of Samuel A. Merrill. I offer for premium the farm known as the Derby Farm, in Salem, carried on by me during the past eleven years. This farm is situated in that part of the city known as South Salem, and consists of one hundred and seventy-five acres, of which ninety acres are in pasture, twenty acres in salt marsh, forty-five acres in English grass, and twenty acres in tillage. The English grass land has been laid down from one to ten years. The pasture has been in its present condition during the whole time I have occupied. When I commenced on the farm, there were about ten acres in tillage. No part of it, however, had been used in the culti- vation of onions, and was not put to this use to any considerable extent until I had been on the farm s(5veral years. The present year I have cultivated the tillage land about as follows : Onions, Potatoes, Cabbages, Tomatoes, Sweet Corn, . Beets, . 6 acres. 5 " 4 " 1 acre. 1. " 2 1 " 2 48 MASS4iCHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. Marrow and Hubbard squashes, . . 1^ acres. • Miscellaneous vegetables, . . . 1-^- " Most of my turnips have been raised as a second crop. Included under the enumeration of English grass land is one acre laid down this year with wheat, and one acre with barley. The live stock consists of five horses, thirty-two cows, one bull, one yoke of oxen, and from six to ten swine. With milch cows I have not been particular in regard to purity of blood, but have endeavored to obtain and keep the best grade and native stock. Have generally found it most expedient to keep good, fair- sized horses, weighing from eleven to twelve hundred. The amount of manure used annually upon the farm has ordinarily been about one hundred and fifty cords. This has included that made by the live stock and considerable night manure hauled from the city, all composted with meadow-mud from the salt marsh. It may not be improper to mention, that my experience in the matter of top-dressing, has led me to use, contrary to the general practice, green cow-manure for this purpose. To obviate the objection that such manure is apt to be so coarse as to be in the way of the scythe and rake, I have found it well to spread it in the month of March, and then, after the frost is fairly out of the ground, run over it with a brush har- row, which reduces it into such small particles as to render it in no way troublesome afterwards. I have generally drawn from the city thirty or forty cords of night-manure. This I have mixed with the meadow mud and barnyard manure, all in one mass, in about equal portions of each, and forked it over twice at least, and in some years three times. As to rotation of crops, I would say that I have found it inex- pedient to attempt to raise either cabbages, beets, or turnips, successive years upon the same piece of land. But as to most other farm products, I have never been convinced that there was any necessity for alternating the crops — as, for instance, onions and carrots do not only as well, but much better when coiitinued successively on the same land. Potatoes do well for four or five years, and, for aught I know, for a much longer FARMS. 49 time. The same can be said of corn and tomatoes. Squashes, liowever, ought not to be planted successively on the same land. I have made it a point to get my seed into the ground at the earliest possible time in the spring, as my nearness to a good city market renders it expedient to give special attention to the raising of early vegetables. In order to avail myself of the advantages of the earliest spring market, I found it profitable to start my plants, such as lettuce, early cabbages, tomatoes, etc., in hot beds. For this purpose I constructed, a few years ago, three ranges of beds, each two hundred and twenty-five feet long, situated on a southerly slope, and facing the south. They are made about a foot high, and have a sash covering, and above this a trellis covering, stuffed with salt hay or straw. These hot-beds are managed as follows : — In the fall I fill them with litter, house the sashes, and lay down the trellis cover. This prevents the earth from freezing inside of the beds. About the first of March I take out the litter and put in about six inches of horse manure, and cover the manure with about four inches of soil, sow the seed, and close the bed nights with both coverings. After the seed comes up, I water the plants every other day, and keep the covers open in the day time to let in air, except when the weather is too cold for the plants. Transplant into the fields about the fifteenth of April. By this means I can get cabbages into the market by the twentieth of June, and some exceptional years I have got them into Boston market as early as the ninth of June. The lettuce generally heads in the bed, ready for market, by the fifteenth of April. Tomatoes are generally ripe and ready for market from the middle of July to the first of August. I have never tried the experiment of making butter, but have taken it for granted that it was more profitable to sell the milk, especially in view of the fact that there was a good milk route connected with the farm when I commenced occupying. This route I have supplied ever since. During the summer the cows get their whole living in the pasture — no extra feed. In the autumn they have had the range of the mowing fields. In the winter, they have generally had ten bushels of beets, with what English hay, black grass and rowen they would eat. The roots were fed out to them once a day only — mornings. 7 60 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. As to the farm buildings I am not aware that there is any- thing pecuhar about them worthy of notice, except that the cow stanchions are in a long, low-roofed L, running out from the barn. This I regard as a very good feature, as the hay, which is wholly kept in the main body of the barn, is by this means preserved from the deterioration, which the steam and heat of the cows cause. The products of the farm for the past season, from April 1 to Nov. 1, 1864, are as follow: Milk, 25,714 quarts, sold in the city at an average of 7 cents per quart. Cabbages and cabbage plants, sold as per sales-book. Onions, 2,500 bushels, at 11.75 per bushel, . Carrots, 20 tons, at $15 per ton, . Mangel wurzel, 10 tons, .... Flat turnips, 500 bushels, at 25 cents per bushel, Ruta-bagas, 200 bushels, at 60 " " " Early potatoes, tomatoes, and other garden sauce. Squashes, ..... English hay, 80 tons, at $30 per ton, Salt hay, 20 tons, at $17 per ton Barley, 30 bushels. Wheat, 25 bushels. Rye, 20 bushels. Wheat straw, 2 tons. Barley straw, 2 tons, Apples , 15 barrels, . $1,799 98 :, 1,500 00 . 4,375 00 300 00 150 00 125 00 120 00 . 2,202 51 50 00 . 2,400 00 340 00 45 00 56 25 40 00 30 00 30 00 45 00 Sales of pork per year have been from seven to eight hun- dred pounds. For seven months of the year I keep seven men and two boys ; for the rest of the year, three men ; and during the season for weeding onions, three extra boys. Besides this, one man is constantly employed on the milk route. The land is exceedingly well adapted to the raising of hay and vegetables. The soil is somewhat varied in different local- ities,— in some places a dark loam upon a clayey bottom ; in others, a light, warm, friable soil. It is also very well situated as to the influences of the sun and moisture, needing no draining, and still capable of resisting droughts. FARMS. 51 Most of my marketing is in Boston, though the early vegetables are generally sold in Salem. In giving this brief statement, I have endeavored to confine myself to a plain and simple report of the character and capa- bilities of the Derby Farm ; and if I have ventured upon giving any inferences, they are only such as are founded upon my own personal experience, and, therefore, have with me the force of actual facts. PLYMOUTH. Statement of A. G. Pratt, of Middleborough. In anticipation of the almost fabulous prices realized this year for all kinds of farm produce, I have endeavored, with the least expense, to secure the greatest possible yield, from every por- tion of my farm ; but I would not be understood that I approve, or recommend, the " skinning process," as practised by some farmers, which every one. must see would shortly be ruinous to any farm. ACCOUNT OF CKOPS AND EXPENSES ON FARM OP A. G. PRATT, FOR 1864. [Lot No. 1 — Orchard — 2 acres, 17 rods.] Expenses. \ acre of rye, . Picking apples, . Total, S3 00 5 00 $8 00 Income. 5 bushels rye at $2, . 50 bushels apples at 50c., Total, [Lot No. 2 — Barn Lot — 2 acres, 13 rods.] Expenses. Securing 3 tons hay, . Cultivating cabbages. Manure for same, Total, S15 00 2 00 2 50 S19 50 Income. 3 tons hay at $25, . Cabbages sold on lot. Apples sold on tree, . Total, [Lot No. 3 — Neck Lot — 17 acres.] Expenses. Spreading manure half day, $00 75 Securing 12 tons hay, . 60 00 Total, $60 75 Income. 9 tons hay at'$25, 3 tons hay at $15, Total, [Lot No. 4 — Meadow — G acres, 4 rods.] Expenses. Securing 4 tons hay, . Total, L2 00 L2 00 Income. 4 tons fresh hay at $12.50, Total, $10 00 25 00 $35 00 $75 00 20 00 10 00 $105 00' $225 00 45 00 §270 00' $50 00- $50 00' \ 52 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. [Lot No. 5— Rye and Oat Field — 7 acres, 3 rods.] Expenses. Ploughing 3^ acres for oats, Harrowing and sowing, 10 bushels seed oats, $10, (grass seed, $5,) . Securing oats, $6, thresh- ing, S7, , Ploughing 2\ acres for rye. Harrowing and rolling, 2 bushels seed rye. Securing rye. Threshing and storing, Ploughing for potatoes, Furrowing, $1, planting, $2, 6 bush, seed potatoes, at 80c., 10 loads manure for potatoes, Cultivating, $2, hoeing, $3, Digging and storing, . Total, . . S7 00 5 00 15 00 13 00 4 50 3 00 2 00 5 00 10 00 2 00 3 00 4 80 5 00 5 00 4 00 $88 30 Income. 71 bushels oats at $1.10, . 2 tons oat straw at $10, 37^ bushels rye at $2, Rye straw sold for 80 bushels potatoes at 75c., \ acre rented, . $78 10 20 00 75 00 22 00 60 00 3 00 Total, $258 10 [Lot No. 6- Expenses. Ploughing the lot, 50 loads manure for corn, . Drawing manure. Harrowing and furrowing, Seed corn, $1.50, potatoes, 50c., .... Planting 5 acres 100 rods to corn, .... Cultivating both ways, (twice per row,) . Hoeing corn twice, . Cutting stalks, . Cutting and drawing corn. Husking and storing. Manure for 60 rods turnips, Harrowing and sowing with machine. Hoeing turnips, $3, harvest- ing, $8, .... Total, -Com Field— 19 acres, 26 rods.] Income. 170 bushels shelled corn at $2.05, .... Corn fodder at $9 per acre, 9 bushels potatoes at 75c., . Early round turnips, . Pasturing sheep, $15 00 25 00 6 00 6 00 2 00 10 00 6 00 25 00 10 00 10 00 15 00 3 00 75 11 00 $144 75 $348 50 60 62 6 75 44 00 12 00 Total, $461 87 FARMS. 53 Expenses. [Lot No. 7— Wood Lot— 12 acres.] Income. 15 cords wood at $3, (stand- ing,) . . . . Total, [Lot No. 8 — Pasture — 9 acres, 103 rods.] Expenses. Repairing fence, Total, $2 00 $2 00 Income. Pasturing 3 cows, Total, [Lot No. 9 — Pasture — 6 acres, 97 rods.] Expenses. Income. Pasturing 1 cow, Total, $45 00 |45 00 ^21 00 $21 00 $7 00 $7 00 [Lot No. 10 — Orchard— 2 acres, 36 rods.] Expenses. Gathering apples, Securing 1 ton hay, . Total, $5 00 5 00 SIO 00 Income. 10 barrels picked apples, . $32 00 40 bush, cider apples at 16|c., 6 67 1 ton hay, . . . 25 00 Total, $63 67 [Lot No. 11— Wheat Field— 7 acres, 101 rods.] Expenses. Ploughing 3 acres for wheat, $6 00 Harrowing and rolling, 6 bushel seed wheat, $12, grass seed, $3, Securing wheat, $7, thresh- Ploughing 1^ acres for corn, 50 loads manure, half spread, half in hill. Carting same, $5, harrow- ing, $1.50, . Planting, .... Cultivating and hoeing, (3 times,) .... Cutting and drawing stalks and corn. Husking and storing, Securing hay, . 3 00 15 00 15 00 3 00 25 00 6 50 4 00 15 00 4 00 00 10 00 Total, $112 50 Income. 36 bushels wheat at $2.25, 2 tons wheat straw, . 60 bushels corn at $2.05, . Corn fodder, 2 tons hay. $81 00 20 00 123 00 13 50 50 00 Total, $287 50 54 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. [Lot No. 12 — Mowing Lot — 4 acres, 22 rods.] Securing Lay, Total, Expenses. $15 00 $15 00 Income. 4 tons fresh hay at $12.50, $50 00 1 ton bank hay. 18 00 Total, [Lot No. 13 — Mowing and Pasture — 15 acres, 30 rods.] [Lot No. 14 — Orchard— 2 acres, 10 rods.] Expenses. On trees, . Total, Securing hay, Total, Securing hay, Total, $2 00 Income. By apples, Total, $2 00 [Lot No. 15 — Mowing — 109 rods.] Expenses. S5 00 $5 00 Income. 1 ton hay, Total, [Lot No. 16 — Mowing — 1 acre, 16J rods.] Expenses. $5 00 $5 00 Income. 1 ton hay, . Total, [Lot No. 17— Potato Field— 6 acres, 107 rods.] Expenses. Ploughing 2 acres for pota- toes, . . . . S4- 00 Manure for same, . . 9 00 10 bushels seed potatoes at 80c., .... 8 00 Harrowing, Si, planting, $4, 5 00 Hoeing, $8, digging, $10, . 18 00 Planting \ acre beans, . 1 00 Cultivating, $2, hoeing, $2, . 4 00 Harvesting, $1, threshing, $1, 2 00 Securing 4 tons hay, . . 20 00 Total, $71 00 $68 00 Expenses. Securing hay, . $4 00 Income. 1 ton fresh hay, Pasturing sheep. . $12 50 12 00 Total, $4 00 $24 50 Income. 280 bushels potatoes at 60c., b\ bushels beans at $3, 4 tons hay at $25, S3 00 S3 00 $25 00 $25 00 $25 00 $25 00 $168 00 16 50 100 00 Total, $284 50 FARMS. 55 [Lot No. 18— Orchard— 145 rods.] Expenses. Income. Repairing fence. • $2 00 1 ton hay, .... $25 00 Securing hay, . . 5 00 26 bushels apples. 10 00 Gathering apples, • • • 2 00 Total, Total, $9 00 $35 00 [Farm Stock.] Expenses. Income. 2 cows, at $40, . . $80 00 150 lbs. butter, $75, milk. 2 hogs, • • • • 75 00 $10, . . . . $85 00 40 sheep, • • • • 80 00 600 lbs. pork,. $100, beef, Fowls, • • • • 25 00 $20, . '. . . 120 00 • 22 lambs, $110, wool, $101, 211 00 • • • Fowls, $85, eggs, $32, Total, 117 00 Total, $260 00 $533 00 [Sundries.] Expenses. Income. Taxes, • • • • $50 00 150 lbs. dried apples. Garden vegetables, . $18 00 25 00 • • • • 139 loads manure, Total, Total, 139 00 Total, $50 00 $182 00 Total, $878 80 $2,783 64 Net income, $878 80 $1,904 84 MiDDLEBOROUGH, Nov. 30, 1864. Statement of Austin J. Roberts. On account of the difficulty of procuring laborers, not so large an extent of land has been planted this year as usual. My attention has been turned to the cultivation of some* of the more profitable crops, and to the greater concentration of labor. The high price of help, and the increasing rate of taxation, will ultimately compel the farmer to make the most of his land, and farm well, or not farm at all ; and the result will be that he will reduce the amount of ground in cultivation until the labor expended shall perform everything in the best manner. 56 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. I have cultivated this season five-eighths of an acre of tobacco, (the Connecticut Seed-Leaf.) The crop has been excellent, and probably will be remunerative. As it is not yet ready to strip, the amount of yield can only be approximated. About the first of January, the tobacco will be stripped, sorted, formed into "hands," and put into bulk, to undergo the sweating process, and in the course of a week after, will be ready for the market. The amount of labor necessary to the cultivation of an acre of tobacco is very great, but the profits also are large. The amount of expense attending this crop, including everything, has been ninety-six dollars, or one hundred and fifty-three dollars and sixty cents per acre. I have roughly called the product one thousand pounds, and the average price of the first and second quality leaf at twenty-five cents. Both estimates are probably below the true figures, which will be corrected in the next annual report. It is an erroneous idea that tobacco is highly exhausting to a soil which is well cared for. No plant can impoverish land annually renewed by rich fertilizers, united with a judicious rotation of crops. The tobacco fields of Virginia have grown poor, while those of Connecticut and Western Massachusetts produce far more grain and grass .than they formerly did, arising from the thorough tillage of the latter, necessary to good tobacco crops, and the application of the best manure, with the concentration of labor upon a small compass ; in other words, making a farmer farm well, or not farm at all. Since my last statement one acre of swamp-meadow has been made into a cultivated cranberry-field. An adjoining bog having been successfully experimented upon by spreading small quan- tities of beach sand upon it in tlie winter, which made it very productive, I determined to reclaim effectually the adjacent piece. Instead of paring, which would have rendered the bog too low, I had the sods inverted. Six hundred loads of sand were carted on, in the winter, on the ice, and levelled to about five inches deep. In June and July twenty-five thousand bunches of vines were set out, averaging eigliteen inches apart. The amount of labor expended, exclusive of turning over the surface and bunching the vines, which was done by the job, was FARMS. 57 one hundred and thirty days ; forty of which were expended in the care of the vines during the summer. Few, if any, of the vines died, and they appear now to have become well rooted. The whole expense — the sanding done at extremely low rates — has .been one hundred and eighty-five dollars. Cranberries succeed on the shores of our ponds, particularly on the south-western side, without artificial flowage. The only cranberries raised in the town this season, on account of the untimely June frost, were produced on this and the adjoining farm. In order to derive a greater profit from my pear-trees, and at the same time to have less care in marketing the many kinds in cultivation, I have grafted three-fourths of my trees to the Bartlett. Large and small trees were cut completely down, and as many scions as necessary put in, thus forming the whole top at once. The grafts have grown finely, many of them five or six feet ; hardly one failed to take. The apple crop has been small, it not being the bearing year with my orchards. Forty young trees — the Romanite apple — have been set out. My large peach-trees were heavily laden with fruit, though but very few trees are as yet large enough to bear. Some of the three-year old trees produced a dozen or so. From the rapid growth of the trees, induced by cultivation, hardly much fruit can be expected for two or three years. Seventy-eight head-trees were added to the peach-orchards in the spring. In speaking of the crops raised I would state, that every item of expense* is to be found under the different heads of the appended schedule, with the value of the product raised. A debtor and credit account is necessary against each field, (the farm is divided into twenty lots,) and at the end of the term the whole amount will be shown. Corn. — One field was planted, an improved Western variety, an account of which will be found in " statement" on premium corn ; the other two lots were of the common Whitman corn ; one manured with a compost of manure and peat, the other with hen-manure and ashes. .8 58 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. The amount of labor expended on the whole has amounted to seventy-nine dollars. Potatoes. — This crop has been raised among apple-trees, and felt the drought rather more on this account. For the extent of land cultivated, the crop has been fg,ir. The kinds planted were the Dykerman, Garnet Chili, New York Peach Bloom, and New York White Peach Bloom. The Dykerman were early, and some sold at one dollar and seventy-five cents per bushel. Turnips. — This crop has been good ; the yield two hundred bushels;, the cost of crop is about eleven and a quarter cents per bushel. Hay has come in about the same as last year. The fresh hay was taken on shares. On account of so much land being devoted to young orchards, and consequently kept in cultiva- tion or ploughed once or twice in the season, the hay crop is smaller than it otherwise would have been. Rye has yielded fifty bushels of grain, and three tons of straw. This crop has cost sixty cents per bushel, the straw being bonus. Hay Hall, Lakeville, Dec. 1, 1864. MANURES. MASSACHUSETTS. Report of the Committee. To the Trustees of the Massachusetts Society for the Promotion of Agriculture : The reports of the competitors for the premiums offered for the tilling and manuring land for the three years of 1862,-'3, and '4, have been examined and reduced to tabular statements, wliich form part of our report. The directions for the cultiva- tion of the lands appear to have been substantially followed. Mr. Weld reports his estimate of the product per acre of each of his lots for the three years. Mr. Perkins reports on a sixth lot dressed by drilling in twenty-four and a half pounds of Coe's super-phosphate of lime. . 17 44 8 55 8 16 7 00 3 02 MANURES. 59 Mr. Ware gives his estimate of the amount of shelled corn and corn-stover per acre from each lot, and states that one hundred pounds of corn in ears gave seventy-six and a half pounds shelled. He has followed the directions for the exper- iments for the three series of three years each, and we take the liberty to quote his remarks, — that the said experiments have been of great value to him, and trusts that they will be useful to farmers. Mr. Leonard gives a valuation of the product of each lot for the three years, as follows — From lots 1, (corn, valued at 11.00,) 2, (rye, " " 1.60,) 3, (hay, " " 1.00,) 4, (straw and stover, .80,) ^j • • • • • . • « And estimates the rye crops on the manured land to average twenty-two bushels per acre, c , The figures in the tables will enable any person to make a similar calculation, and the result in money value. Mr. Curtis planted corn in 1862, again in 1863, and sowed barley in 1864. Mr. Farmer divided his land of one hundred and fifty rods into three parts of fifty rods each, and made his experiments on each of them, apparently for the purpose of testing the relative value of the manures used. The manure used on the lots in range No. 1, so called, was a compost, of three parts of cattle manure and one part of meadow mud, seventy-five and five-twelfths cubic feet to each lot, except lot No. 5. On range 2, seventy-two and five-twelfths feet of compost, one-third meadow mud, and two-thirds horse manure, two shotes having wintered on it. On range No. 3, compost of clear meadow mud, with eighty-three pounds of Coe's super-phosphate of lime to each cord of mud and same number of cubic feet. He reports no wheat, but wheat-straw, and he gives his estimate of the product per acre of each of his fifteen lots in straw, and the first and second crops of hay. The crop of Mr. Hull appears to be small, but he states that he selected his poorest acre, hoping thereby to see the best 60 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. result of the manure used according to the directions for the cultivation of the land. An imperfect report was received from the Essex County farm. It may be noticed that the lands selected for experiments vary in size from thirty rods to one acre. This explains the differences in the number of pounds of crop reported in the tables. The amounts of crop may have also depended on the fertility of the soil, in the strength of manure used, and the varieties of temperature and moisture. The lots two and three, where the manure was ploughed in four inches or harrowed in, produced the largest number of pounds of crops, and it appears to be the general opinion that manures should be lightly covered by shallow ploughing or by good harrowing, or, in other words, that it should be well mixed with the soil when spread on the surface of land before planting. This report concludes the three series of experiments for premiums offered by the society, and we think that the farmers, few in number, who cultivated lands in compliance with the request of the State Board of Agriculture, and for the chance of gaining the premiums offered, are well entitled to receive the thanks of the farming interest of the State for the care, attention, labor and expense which the experiments may have required of them, and also to receive the premiums to be awarded. Respectfully submitted, Geo. W. Lyman, for the Committee. Boston, February 10, 1864. Note. — The premiums of $100 each were awarded to Mr. Ware, to Mr. Farmer, and to Mr. Weld. Gratuities of $50 each were awarded to Mr. Perkins, Mr. Curtis, Mr. Hull, and Mr. Leonard. MANURES. 61 Table No. 1, Showing the pounds of crop on each of the five lots for the three years. NAMES. 1 Lotsl. Lots 2. Lots 3. Lots 4. Lots 6. Totals. r 578 759 621 598 368 920 1.058 782 920 322 75 117 97 78 43 A. D. Weld, (100 rods,) . \ 270 393 3.33 232 257 405 510 430 420 330 2,248 2,837 2,263 2,248 1,320 10,916 ■ 876 891 1,100 838 808 26 1 27i 30J 281 31 C 0. Perkins, (30 rods,) his 74i 74 82i 46| 71i No. 6 lot omitted, 159 1541 161 150 84 l,136i l,146i 1,373| l,063i 994i 5,7141 1,501 1,637 1,506 1,316 942 2,134 2,078 1,774 1,664 1,178 74 77 79 69 55 B P. Ware, (1 acre,) . . ■ 266 228 221 201 115 435 435 455 475 290 4,410 4,455 4,035 3,725 2,580 19,205 f 403 424 456 407 267 264 283 308 264 191 2.30 236 326 256 168 L. W. Curtis, (1 acre,) . . | 205 294 220 308 232 336 215 252 140 154 104 110 120 90 61 1,500 1,581 1,778 1,484 981 7,324 257 286 677 242 165 177 202 194 169 105 • 79 86 86 61 8 s. Leonard, Jr., (50 rods,) . 128 140 134 100 15 121 172 151 164 55 762 886 1,242 736 348 3,974 185 168 242 379 86 164 188 228 310 146 131 135 150 149 72 J. B. Hull, (1 acre,) . 163 180 196 229 106 282 227 200 266 108 925 898 1,016 1,333 518 4,690 19.14 16.80 18.15 14.19 11.71 J. B. Farmer, First Range, (50 rods,) . '. 328. 144. 359. 158. 373. 151. 339. 113. 210. 90. 491.14 533.80 542.15 466.19 311.71 2,344.99 16.99 19.30 20.13 14.52 15.68 J B. Farmer, Second Range, (50 rods,) .... 117. 36. 148. 81. 283. 140. 3.33. 128. 198. 76. 169.99 248.30 443.13 475.52 289.68 1,626.62 7.92 8.91 8.25 8.74 8.16 J B. Farmer, Third Range, (50 rods,) . 49. 17. 59. 27. 56. 27. 65. 30. 37. 73.92 94.91 91.25 • • 103.74 • • 45.16 • • 412.98 Total for three years of all the lots 56,208.09 62 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. O o o o © ^< 00 'fl* CO -Tf < ) 1 1 p 1 1 1 1 1 i (M o^ "*, »-„ CO_^ & w ^-« 05~ ■*'" co" co~ cf -^ < . O -* o 00 ^ l» CO -^ CO iH CO S § c 7-; i-J CO o C rH ^ (N tH lO iri iri -^ Tj5 CM 1 1 1 1 1 o . 5 ei ■"d* CO CO tH » tc O • H« H« -a . £ o o o -^ CO r~. CD i- lo O .Hf O O O r-t s s 7 (N -* (N 1 1 1 CO 1 o^ .o o> 00 » I-l CO ^2 csr-l 1-1 CI 05 CO iH iH QJ O ^ lO OD CO lO (N £ •C O X 00 o 00 00 iO ■s M ;3 r-( QQ r+« H-ll ^4pi ■ Id OTNt • »n O O O O C5 ■* 1-1 o -* CM in Its >n in o in in CD Tj< o 00 ^ CO CO in t- Oi ■<* in -.^ -^ eo r-l r-l iH tH „^ tH th Tjl -* ■* (M W HN M-* «l* M« «Wt • o CO CO (M l^ -* ■* 4 O 00 0 00 (N (M UoOtlJ » CO 1- t^ CO J^ S«D 00 O CD O ^ <) H W CO 05 0_ t- 05 i-T CO p,I9Ai. J8A0;S pUB njoD JO dojo ejoqj^ i-j^ o_ t-;_ CO of cm" i-T i-T rH_ r-T 3 CM CO (M rH •o . 00 05 tH 00 OD CO I-l o 00 00 o 1-1 t- CD CD (M CO ■* CD »^ t- ^ a , t- lO CM 05 CO J^ 02 O CO o (M O CO O 1-1 -fl o CM in O CO H ::? ^ tn lO t- CO lO CO 00 00 i-J_ 00 00 t^ in__ cD^ in_ eo_ O -* -^ -^ -^ (N a; o J3 ,C o •^ I-T ih" I-T I-T I-T CO 1^ tn o tH o\ m> ^ lO I-l (M CO -* in CO iH CM CO -if in r-l (M CO "^ in s ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ • • • • • • • • « • • ■ • -o . . • co" • • • • Q • • • • • • • • • • • • H p tn" a in" O 1- • • "3 3 • • • • Q s .a =5 ^ . . . w Q • • fl • • • r of c CI a) i CO (N (?) iH in -^< CO OS OS (?) t^ 1— ( »n 00 (?) (3s CD 00 CD -* »^ 00 rH tH (?) CO t- CO 1^ (?) in in 00 t^ -* CO (?) (N (M (N T-l •H< CO in OS 1-1 i-H 00 iH rH t~; OS CO 00 -^ 1-5 O O CO (M 00 OS CO i-J K5 CO CD cfs MU .i;-S g.i: HPMcnH 64 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. oo 6 \& < .2 60 a> u Ol 03 o Ui 03 rri to •a 2 c o ja 3 -w o a O p. a; a « O t3 .5 i :s 2 *Ui ■s 3 a to a) es .a a "cS 5 a) a c*- ■t-l 3 a 1^ © (0 > O 'o 'C 3 J3 CO CO .-S oo ■— s .a o _fl fl CS I-I : a (P a. aj J3 2 a a .s s "u •4^ j3 S.a 's 1 H H i-t OD CD in xj s o o iH 00 00 CD 05 in o 00 * ' r» oo oo ^ T— ( iH 00 -* 00 oo o co_ Ci lO_ OJ CCI in CO CI co_ o O 1-1 bj th" of t-T ti 05 Ol ■* o s ^ -(■i< rH in 1~; »~ H t» OD M lO -fl CD CO CD iri I-^ oo >5 O -M -* «D Ol 00 CO CO CD j~ O CO • o 00 o o (M C3 o_ t~ *i o_ m -* »^ H^ Id o 1-1 CO 00 CO 00 ■* d H ■«J n -* in 00 OO OS CO •^ 03 00 H o 00 1-H_ "^ "^ 00 OS in c* CD ■4 K? tf H c 1-1 S en cT '1*^ rn to 2 a • (.4 tM CS ed t3 L< o a u u g.-i o ZJ O O O O O • • • • • • • a' a • 1 a" 'i • o e3 O a" -§ ja -a a • CO o O to s O •a o ■i-T es to *-* . fS O 1-1 CS CO he 3 • i£ • • • • • • • o to AMES. 2 to" a '■i • 1 a o "a a CS • o !zi Q 6 P^ ^ 1-1 m m • 1 -i *-i > as to tn oT to* to" tn to" o 2 ■a o sT 2" o -a o o T3 O H n lO u» MANURES. 65 ESSEX. Statement of B. P. Ware for. 1862. In competing for the premium offered by your society for the best experiments on the application of manure — offered this year, 1862 — I selected an acre of land adjoining the lot upon which I commenced a similar experiment last year. The soil is a dark loam, nine inches deep, resting upon a gravelly subsoil — not leachy, but rather light — nearly level, with the exception of a gentle swell running across the lot. In April of 1861, four cords of compost manure were spread upon this land, and it was sown with oats. On the tenth of June, the oats having attained a large growth, they were turned under, and the land sown with carrots, but, owing to the dry, hot weather, the seed failed, and in July, I sowed flat turnips, which grew finely and yielded a large crop. On the fourteenth of May last, I divided the lot into five equal parts, and manured four of them with compost manure at the rate of ten cords per acre, which manure was taken from a heap containing sixty -five cords, all forked over and worked together. I like to compost my manure all in one heap, (except some special manures,) as fermentation is more rapid, and I think there is less waste than in several smaller heaps. Said compost heap was composed of meadow mud, sea manure and barn manure, -the whole mass drenched with eighteen cords of night soil. The same quantity of manure was applied to each lot, and it was ploughed in eight inches in lot No. 1 ; four inches in lot No. 2 ; harrowed in in lot No. 3, and spread on the sur- face of lot No. 4 after planting ; while none was applied to lot No. 5. The directions of the circular werer followed- to the letter. May seventeenth, I planted nine rows of King Philip corn in each lot, three and a half feet apart, and hills in the rows the same distance — six kernels in' a hill, and covered the seed one ajiid a half inches deep. The corn was horse-hoed, or cultivated, three times during the season, and hand-hoed twice — not a weed was allowed to grow. October sixth, the corn was cut up close to the ground and stooked up. November third, being well dried and in good order, I had the whole weighed and stored 9 66 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. in the barn, where it was husked within a week and carefully weighed. Lot No. 1 produced 3,635 pounds of unhusked corn ; 1,462 lbs. of sound ears ; 39 lbs. of unsound ears ; 2,134 lbs. stover. Lot No. 2 produced 3,715 pounds of unhusked corn ; 1,608 lbs. of sound ears ; 29 lbs. of unsound ears ; 2,078 lbs. stover. Lot No. 3 produced 3,280 pounds of unhusked corn ; 1,462 lbs. of sound ears ; 44 lbs. of unsound ears ; 1,774 lbs. stover. Lot No. 4 produced 2,980 pounds of unhusked corn ; 1,284 lbs. of sound ears ; 32 lbs. of unsound ears ; 1,664 lbs. stover. Lot No. 5 produced 2,120 pounds of unhusked corn; 902 lbs. of sound ears ; 40 lbs. of unsound ears ; 1,178 lbs. stover. One hundred pounds of ears yielded seventy-six and a half pounds of shelled corn. One bushel measure of shelled corn weighed fifty-seven and a half pounds. From the above data it may be seen that the several lots pro- duced, of the several kinds of products, at the rates per acre as given in the following table : Shelled com. Stover. Unsound corn in ear. Lot No. 1, 97 bushels ; 10,670 pounds ; 195 pounds. " " 2, 1061 (( 10,390 (( 145 a • " " 3, 97 a 8,870 a 220 a " " 4, 851 (( 8,320 a 160 a " " 5, 60 (C 5,890 a 200 u SYNOPSIS OF THE WEATHER. First Third. Second Third. Last Third May, • . dry. dry. dry. June, . moist. dry. moist. July, . moist. moist. moist. Augusf, . . moist. moist. • moist. September, . dry. moist. dry. Marblehead, November 14, 1862. Statement of B. P. Ware for 1863. The acre of land upon which was commenced the experiment on the applicatipn of manure last year, I this year — May first — ploughed eight inches deep ; then sowed upon the furrow two and a half bushels wheat, after soaking two hours in strong brine, and ploughed it in with Knox's gang plough, four inches MANURES. 67 deep ; then sowed three pecks redtop and twelve quarts of herds- grass seed, together with seven pounds of clover seed ; then dragged it smooth. * The severe drought in June nearly ruined the crop, as the result will show. August fifteenth it was cradled and stocked up. Lot No. 1 produced 74 lbs. of clean wheat, and 266 lbs. of straw. Total, 340 lbs. Lot No. 2 produced 77 lbs. of clean wheat, and 228 lbs. of straw. Total, 305 lbs. Lot No. 3 produced 79 lbs. of clean wheat, and 221 lbs. of straw. Total, 300 lbs. Lot No. 4 produced 69 lbs. of clean wheat, and 201 lbs. of straw. Total, 270 lbs. Lot No. 5 produced 55 lbs. of clean wheat, and 115 lbs-, of straw. Total, 170 lbs. SYNOPSIS OF THE WEATHER. First Third. Second Third. Last Tliird May, . wet. moist. dry. June, . dry. moist. dry. July, . dry. wet. wet. August, . . wet. moist. moist. September, . moist. moist. moist. Marblehead, November 6, 1863. Statement of B. P. Ware for 1864. The result of the third year's crop grown upon the land to which your attention has been called for the two preceding years, is as follows : The grass was cut June twenty-fifth, and each lot weighed -June twenty-seventh, after being well cured. Lot No. 1 produced . 435 pounds of hay. . 435 " " . 455 " « . 475 " " . 290 " " The extreme drought of June caused the crop to be very small, although I suppose the relative product of the several lots was not materially changed thereby. 68 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. This closes the third experiment of three years each that I have made upon the application of manure with regard to ascer- taining to what depth manure shall be covered to produce the most profitable results. I have endeavored to be exact in all of the experiments, and have been a close observer of the results ; and from them I am satisfied, that with the various crops, and taking one year with another, that to cover manure about four inches deep will yield better results than any other depth, and better cover it less than more. I feel that these experiments have been of great value to me, and trust that they may be promotive of the cause of agriculture. SYNOPSIS OF THE WEATHER. First Third. Second Third. Last Third. May, . moist. moist. moist. June, . moist. dry. very dry July, . dry. dry. moist. August, . . moist. moist. moist. September, . moist. moist. moist. Marblehead, November 1, 1864. PLYMOUTH. From the Report of the Committee. For the premiums offered by this society, under the direction of the State Board of Agriculture, for experiments in the appli- cation of manures, for a three years' rotation of crops, there have been four entries, one in 1860, two in 1861, and one in 1862. As these experiments are now completed, it may be well to inquire whether their results are sufficiently decisive to indicate a general and reliable rule for the application of manure. The condition of these experiments, fixed by the State Board, required the division of the land into five equal plots, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. " Divide the manure into four equal parts. Spread evenly one-fourth of the manure upon plot No. 1, and then plough the whole field of an equal depth. Apply another fourth to plot No. 2, and then cross-plough the whole to about half the depth of the first ploughing. Spread another fourth upon plot No. 3, and harrow or cultivate the whole field, after MANURES. 69 wliicli sow or plant the whole, evenly, with any crop preferred. Fmally, spread the remaining quarter part of the manure upon plot No. 4." No. 5 was to be cultivated without manure. As to the points at issue, No. 5 would seem to have been about as useless an appendage to the others as would be the fifth wheel to a coach. Fertilizers are as much a recognized necessity for our soils, under tillage, as is provender for our cattle. In experiments to determine the best method of feeding domestic animals, it would hardly be deemed necessary that one indi- vidual should be kept famishing. That^our soils are rendered more productive by the application of manure, is beyond dis- pute. The cases in which they can be economically, or even safely cultivated without it, are exceedingly rare. The question is, Which of the four prescribed methods of applying manure will insure the greatest returns? The theoretical answer is, that method which will most thoroughly incorporate it with that portion of the soil usually penetrated by the roots of the plants to be cultivated. This thorough incorporation cannot be effected by leaving the manure upon the surface, as in No. 4, nor, usually, by burying it beneath an eight-inch furrow, as in No. 1, or, by a single harrowing, as in No. 3. Although no one method of applying manure is precisely suited to all soils and all seasons, that of cross-ploughing in, as in No. 2, most nearly answers the condi- tions of thorough incorporation and reasonable protection from the waste consequent on free exposure to the sun and winds. Ill cross-ploughing land, the furrow, haviiVg no adhesiveness, is partly pushed aside, and but partly inverted, so that by a cross- furrow four inches deep, but a small portion of the manure can be buried to that depth ; it will, especially, after a subsequent harrowing, be pretty evenly distributed through the soil, from the surface down to the depth of the cross-furrow. In most soils, suitable for tillage, the roots of • cultivated plants are most numerous at some distance not greater than four or five inches below the surface, and wherever the roots are most numerous and most vigorous, manure will be [kept sufficiently moist to insure its assimilation by the planjfc. In an extremely wet season, manure from the surface may reach the roots of plants through the percolation of water ; in an extremely dry one, the roots may reach the manure at the 70 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. bottom of an eight-incli farrow. On very wet or dry soils, similar results may follow. But such seasons are the effect of meteorological accidents, which cannot be foreseen, and such soils are not those usually selected for cultivation. It has been urged in favor of surface-manuring, that " Nature always manures upon the surface." Admitting this to be true, (which we do not,) the answer is, that art is superior to nature, or all civilization is folly. Nature deposits her seeds upon the surface, leaving time and chance to supply the needed covering. We deem it wiser, in planting, to furnish the covering at the outset, leaving nothing to time and chance, which can be made presently certain. The same wisdom should teach us to place our fertilizers in a position to be most easily accessible to the roots, which are the feeding mouths of plants. It is doubtless true that nothing is lost or annihilated ; and manure, exposed upon the most sterile rock, would, through the operation of mechanical forces or chemical affinities, find its place and its use somewhere in the economy of nature. But we cannot afford fertilizers for a continent. Concentration, not diffusion, should be our motto in the use of manures. The burden of the song of all writers upon this subject has been, protection for manure, in the compost heap and in the yard ; protection from the sun, from the wind, from the rains ; and no good reason is apparent why this protection should not be continued in the field, where the facilities for such protection are greatest. In each of the experiments under consideration, the succession of crops was nearly .the same — corn, rye, oats, or barley, and, grass. In two of them, plot No. 2, manure cross-ploughed in, gave the greatest value of products ; in one, No. 1, manure ploughed in ; and in one, No. 3, manure harrowed in. The smallest return, in each instance, was from No. 4, manure left upon the surface. As the manure upon these plots, numbered 4, was in each case ploughed in for the second crop, it is evident that its waste, by exposure during the first season, amounted to a considerable percentage of its orighial value. If anything has been rendered certain by these experiments, it is that the exposure of manure upon the surface of tilled land, is not good husbandry. In Mr. Leonard's first experiment, commencing in 18G0, the order of the plots, as to the value per acre of products, was as follows : MANURES. 71 No. 2, manure cross-ploughed in, . . $104 6C} No. 1, manure ploughed in, . . . 98 13 No. 3, manure harrowed in, . . . 88 26 No. 4, manure left on the surface, . . 86 40 In Mr. Leonard's second experiment, commencing in 1861, the order and value per acre, were : No. 1, manure ploughed in, . . . . $142 66 No. 2, manure cross-ploughed in, . . 135 86 No. 3, manure harrowed in, . . . 132 27 No. 4, manure left on the surface, . . 128 40 In Mr. Leonard's third experiment, commencing in 1862, the order and value were: No. 2, manure cross-ploughed in, . . $136 80 No. 3, manure harrowed in, . . . 130 56 No. 1, manure ploughed in, . . . 119 04 No. 4, manure on the surface, . . . 112 00 In Mr. Benson's experiment, commencing in 1861, the order and value were : No. 3, manure harrowed in, , . ' . $124 40 No. 2, manure cross-ploughed in, . . 123 85 No. 1, manure ploughed in, . . . 120 90 No. 4, manure on the surface, . . . 98 20 Perhaps no more satisfactory course can be pursued, with reference to results so various than that of reducing them to an average. This course is favored by the consideration that the weather, which, doubtless, had some influence on these results, can never be anticipated, except to the extent indicated by the mean of previous years. The average value, per acre, of the first crop in rotation, corn, in the four experiments, was : No. 2, manure cross-ploughed in, . . ' $66 76 No. 1, manure ploughed in, . . . 66 27 No. 3, manure harrowed in, . . . 62 87 ^ No. 4, manure on the surface, . . . 55 50 72 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. These figures indicate that, for corn alone, manure should be cross-ploughed, or ploughed in. The excess of products on land cross-ploughed over that ploughed only, is not, however, sufficient to warrant the increased ex]3ense. The average, per acre, of the second crop, small grains, in all the experiments, was : No. 2, manure cross-ploughed in, . . $29 53 No. 1, manure ploughed in, . . . 29 51 No. 3, manure harrowed in, . . . 28 84 No. 4, manure on the surface, . . . 24 23 These results are, relatively, about the same as in the previous crop, and the same remarks are applicable, with the addition tliat, for a rotation of corn and small grains, the manure ploughed in for corn should be brought up by the plough, and mixed with the soil, before the second crop is sown. The average, per acre, of the third crop, grass, in all the experiments, was: No. 2, manure cross-ploughed in, . . 129 00 No. 3, manure harrowed in, . . . 27 16 No. 4, manure on the surface, . . . , 24 78 No. 1, manure jDloughed in, . . . 24 40 We have here different results. No. 2 still has the lead ; No. 3 and No. 4 have each advanced one step, while No. 1 has dropped to the foot of the list. The conclusion follows that for grass, after grain crops, (and the same is doubtless true for grass as the sole crop) manure should be kept near, but below the surface. It may appear, however, that, for reasons which will be suggested. No. 1 occupies too low a place in this comparison. Averaging the value, per acre, of the four plots numbered 1, the four plots numbered 2, &c., for the whole course in rotation, we have the following: No. 2, manure cross-ploughed in, . . 8125 29 No. 1, manure ploughed in, . . . 120 18 No. 3, manure harrowed in, . . . 118 87 No. 4, manure on the surface, . . 106 25 MANURES. 73 ' These results arc in accordance with the theory that manure cross-ploughed in should give the greatest returns; the excess being $5.11 per acre over manure plouglied in, $0.42 over manure harrowed in, and $19.04 over manure left on the sur- face. This average excess of No. 2 is considerably diminished,, as is also the relative standing of No. 1, by the somewhat pecu- liar results of Mr. Benson's experiment, the only one in which No. 3 gave an excess of products. A few suggestions as to the details of this experiment may not be inappropriate, especially as the Massachusetts Society, by their award of premiums, have indorsed it as being " more thorough, exact, and reliable " than any other in this county, at least ; a decision at variance with that of your board of trustees, who, on the recommendation of their supervisor, awarded to Mr. Benson the second premium only. The land selected for this experiment was heavily manured the year before the experiment was commenced, the manure being cross-ploughed in without breaking the previously inverted sward. It, of course, remained .near the surface till the first ploughing for the experiments, which, being about nine inches deep, placed this manure low down in the soil. No. 3, No. 4 and No. 2, measurably, were thus enriched below the surface by the manure first applied, and at or near the surface by that applied subsequently ; while the surface of No. 1, during the first year, was not directly enriched by either application, both being deeply buried by the plough. No. 1 was thus evidently placed at a disadvantage, at the outset. The cultivation was different in this experiment from that in any other, so far as appears from the statements of competitors. The manut-e applied to No. 1 was ploughed into a depth of about nine inches ; yet it seems to have been reached by the roots of the first crop, corn, as No. 1 gave the greatest yield the first year. As the second ploughing was but six inches deep, the manure on No. 1 must have remained undisturbed, where the roots of the second crop could only reach it by penetrating some three inches of compact earth, or earth not in tilth; while, on each of the otiier plots, all the manure was contained in the six inches of earth kept mellow by the plough. This condition of things could but be unfavorable to the growth of the last two crops on No. 1 ; yet the crop of oats seems to have 10 74 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. been diminished but slightly in consequence, being but twenty pounds per acre less than on No. 2, and twenty-five pounds less than on No. 3. Mr, Benson's statement that " No. 1 took the lead the first year in corn, but No. 3 got the lead the second .year, and kept it," is calculated to convey an erroneous impres- sion. The value of the products of No. 1 at the close of the first year, exceeded that of No. 3 by $3.95, and at the close of the second year by $3.40. The great falling off in the products of this- plot was in the third, or grass crop, which gave $8.65 per acre less than No. 2, and $9.45 less than No. 3. A different result could hardly have been anticipated. Manure buried beneath nine inches of earth is not in a position to cause grass to set well or to grow vigorously. Had the manure on No. 1, and the earth in which it was imbedded, been mixed and mel- lowed by the plough the second year, its grass crop would undoubtedly have compared much more favorably with that of the other plots. In this experiment we find a remarkable difference in pro- ductiveness between No. 3 and No. 4 ; No. 3, manure harrowed in, giving an excess of $26.20 per acre over No 4, manure left upon the surface. As in all other respects the cultivation was the same on both plots, this sum, $26.20, would seem to repre- sent the value of the single harrowing. If such were the fact, we might reasonably expect an approximation to the same result in Mr. Leonard's second experiment, in progress during the same seasons, in very nearly the same locality, subject, of course, to the same climatic influences, on land much less reten- tive of moisture, and, consequently, less favorable to surface manuring. But in Mr. Leonard's experiment, the difference per acre, in favor of No. 3, as compared with No.*4, was but $3.87. In his first experiment, the difference was still less, being but $1.86. In view of the fact that Mr. Benson's experi- ment presents results so peculiar, and so different from those in other experiments, we may well be pardoned for expressing a doubt as to the entire accuracy of his figures, or, more reason- ably, perhaps, of the correctness of his opinion as to the quality of the soil of the several plots. On alluvial deposits, or on prairie lands, tracts may doubtless be selected, of equal productiveness throughout ; but on our irregular drift; it is difficult, if not impossible, to find an acre MANURES. 75 so uniform in quality and texture that its products, if entered for premium, could be safely computed from the yield of its best or of its poorest rood. Mr. Benson's plots were each thirty-two rods long and one wide, No. 3 being the central one. There is nothing in his state- ment of the mode of ploughing to indicate any undue advantage to this plot, by turning upon it soil or manure from the adjacent ones ; but the whole field, as it now lies, forms a sort of water- shed, being highest in the middle and lowest at the sides. If this is, to any extent, owing to its having been ploughed with back furrows in the centre, either during, or previous to the occu- pancy of the present proprietor, inequality of soil must be the .inevitable result. Accidental inequalities in soils arise from various causes, and their existence is sometimes unsuspected till the land is brought under tillage. The maintenance of a partition-fence during a series of years, in the days when sheep were found on every farm, seeking the sides of such fertces for protection alike from heat and cold, has induced an improved condition of the soil in its immediate vicinity, apparent on cultivation long after all traces of its existence had disappeared. The peculiar produc- tiveness of a particular strip of land, apparently similar to that adjoining, was observed by the writer, when it was first tilled under his notice, thirty years ago. Inquiries made at that time elicited the fact that, more than twenty years before, the ashes from a family leach tub were carelessly deposited thereon, not for purposes of fertilization, but as the most convenient method of getting rid of a worthless incumbrance. These particular causes of accidental inequalities in soils are not mentioned as probably operative in this case, but to show the difficulty of selecting an acre of land of equal quality throughout. That the excess of products on plot No. 3 over plot No. 4, in this experi- ment, was due to some inherent or accidental superiority of its soil, would seem as probable, to say the least, as that it was the effect of a single harrowing. These suggestions are made, not because this experiment presents results at variance with a favorite theory, but because the award of so large a premium as one hundred dollars, by such a body of agriculturists as those constituting the Massa- chusetts Society of Agriculture, influenced though they doubt- . 76 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. less were, to some extent, by its quantity as well as its quality, might be thought, by some farmers, to warrant the conclusion that harrowing in manure is the most judicious and profitable mode of applying it. Such a conclusion will be more satisfac- tory, if arrived at legitimately, through an examination of the facts, than if accepted upon trust. As [these experiments have been conducted at considerable expense to the society, considerable space is devoted to their consideration, in order that their results may be rendered easily accessible and practically useful to those for whose benefit they were projected. Alden S. Bradfokd, Supervisor. Statement- of Spencer Leonard, Jr. Application op Manures. — Mr. Leonard, in his statement, says: In compliance with the rules of the society, I will give you the result of the experiment in the application of manure, commencing in 1862, and closing in 1864. The weather, while the crop was in the field this year, was nearly as follows : First 10 Days. Second 10 Days. Last 10 Days. May, . ' . wet, moist, moist. June, . . dry, dry, very dry. The grass was a mixture of clover and bluegrass, and, on the plots manured was a fair crop. It was cut June 29th, andwhen well cured, weighed as follows : Plot No. 1, 121 lbs " " 2, 179 " " " 3, 151 " " « 4, 1 164 " " " 5, 55 " As my statements for the years 1862 and! 1863 gave the amount of crops and mode of cultivation for those years, I will now give you only the amount of produce of each plot, with its estimated value for each of the three years. In the following estimate, corn on the ear is valued at $1 ; rye, 12.60 ; hay, $1 ; corn fodder and straw, 50 cents — per cwt. MANURES. 77 18G2. Plot No. 1, 257 lbs. corn, . " " 177 lbs. stover, 1863. " 79 lbs. rye, . " " 128 lbs. straw, . , 1864. " 129 lbs. hay, . Total value on Plot No. 1 for three years, 1862. Plot No. 1, 286 lbs. corn, . 1863. 1864. a it u 202 lbs. stover, 86 lbs. rye, 140 lbs. straw,' 174 lbs. hay, . Total value on Plot No. 2 for three years, 1862. Plot No. 3, 277 Ibs.^corn, . " " 194 lbs.%tover, . 1863. •" 86 lbs. rye, ^ . " " 134 lbs. straw, 1864. " ISllbs.Jiay, . Total value on Plot No. 3 for three years, 1862. Plot No. 4, 242 lbs. corn, . " . " 169 lbs. stover, 1863. " 61 lbs. rye, . " " 100 lbs. straw, . 1864. " 164 1bs.lhay, . Total value on Plot No. 4 for three years, 1862. Plot No. 5, 165 lbs. corn, " " 105 lbs. stover, 1863. " 8 lbs. rye, ■" " 15 lbs. straw, 1864. " 55 lbs. hay. Total. value on Plot No. 5 for three years. ^2 57 89- 2 05 64- -13 46 - 2 69 1 29 $7 44 $2 86 1 01- -$3 87 2 24 70- - 2 94 1 74 $8 55 $2 77 97- -13 74 2 24 67- - ^ 91 1 51 18 16 $2 42 85- -$3 27 1 59 50- - 2 09 1 64 17 00 $1 65 53—12 18 21 08- - 29 55 m 02 * RECAPITULATION. Total value on Plot No. 1, manure ploughed in 7 inches $7 44 78 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. Do. No. 2, cross-ploughed in 4 inches deep, . . . $8 55 Do. No. 3, harrowed in, . . . . . . 8 16 Do. No. 4, spread upon the surface, . . . . 7 00 Do. No. 5, no manure applied, . . • . . . 3 02 From the foregoing it would appear that Plot No. 2, where the manure was cross-ploughed in, has made the largest return : 39 cents more than Plot No. 3, where the manure was harrowed in ; 11.11 more than Plot No. 1, where the manure was spread upon the sward and ploughed in seven inches deep ; $1.55 more than Plot No. 4, where the manure was left upon the surface ; $5.53 more than Plot No. 5, without any manure. The rye and clover upon Plot No. 5, being winter-killed, reduced the value of that plot very materially, and it would appear that to culti- vate our Plymouth County soils without any manures is a very unprofitable mode of farming. VINEYARDS. WORCESTER NORTH. Report of the Committee. Ever since " Noah began to be a husbandman, and planted a vineyard," the grape has occupied a place more or less promi- nent among the cultivated fruits in some portions of almost every civihzed country. Growing, (as history informs us,) in its liighest perfection in Syria and Asia — this luscious fruit and the unrivalled beverage it produced, early recommended it to the special notice of the patriarchal tillers of the soil, who planted vineyards long before any considerable attention was given to the cultivation of other varieties of fruit. As civiliza- tion advanced, the vine accompanied it first to Egypt, Greece, and Sicily, and subsequently to Italy, Spain, France, aaid Bri- tain, to which latter place it was introduced by the Romans about two hundred years after the Christian era. The grapes of the old world were celebrated for their excellent wine-pro- ducing qualities, and the products of vineyards, in the same VINEYARDS. 79 localities at the present day, still retain this distinguishing characteristic. In France the cultivation of the vine is very extensive. Goodrich informs us, that 5,000,000 acres are devoted to that object, and that the estimated value of the products in 1854, amounted to !$130,000,000. Although in no other country is there so large a part of the territory devoted to this object, still, in nearly all the minor States «of Europe the grape furn- ishes no inconsiderable part of the products of the soil. Plants and seeds of foreign varieties were brought to this country by colonists during the first fifty years after its settlement, but no considerable attention seems to have been given to their propa-. gation until after the close of the Revolutionary War. After our forefathers had succeeded in throwing off the British yoke, and obtained a name among the nations, their attention began to be more especially directed to the cultivation of various kinds of fruit. Among these (though not the most prominent,) was the grape. Experience soon showed that these foreign varieties would not withstand the severity of our stern New England winters without protection ; and that our short and variable summers, and early autumnal frosts, presented an insurmount- able barrier to their successful cultivation, (except under glass.) These efforts in relation to grapes of foreign origin having thus far failed, the attention of the fruit grower has been wisely directed to the examination of our more hardy native varieties. These, especially such as are found growing on the borders of our New England streams, are more or less characterized by the hardness of their pulp and a peculiar foxy flavor which renders them as a dessert fruit, somewhat unpalatable. Expe- rience however has shown that these objectionable qualities are susceptible of being materially modified by cultivation. By a careful selection of the most promising for propagation and by reproduction, several new varieties have been obtained within the last few years of acknowledged excellence, and well adapted to our New England climate. Among those now propagated in this vicinity, (more or less approved,) are the Concord, Delaware, Hartford Prolific, Diana, Rebecca, and Early Amber. The two first of the above-named are undoubtedly the best and most profitable for the market, possessing the three important qualities of being hardy, good bearers, and holding 80 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. their fruit well. Several other new varieties, not yet fully tested, have recently been brought to notice. Rogers' Hybrid and Grant's lona and Israella, are all highly recommended and will no doubt soon occupy a high position in the catalogue. In most of the Middle, and some of the South-Western States, vineyards on something of an extended scale have within a few years been planted and are now under successful cultivation. Many valuable varieties whieh cannot be successfully grown in New England, succeed well on the banks of the Ohio. The Catawba seems to take the lead in that locality, producing an# abundant crop of well-ripened fruit, and richly rewarding the .husbandman for his labor. In California, also, where the vine, even in its wild, uncultivated state, bears the choicest fruit, vineyards have within a few years past been planted, which are said to produce in abundance grapes unsurpassed both in size and in flavor. This will undoubtedly eventually become one of the largest fruit-growing States in this country. Wine has already been produced there, wliich is said to compare favorably with the best of foreign importation. These unmistakable demonstrations in regard to the propaga- tion and improvement of our native grapes will, we trust, be a sufficient guarantee for awakening in the minds of this commu- nity, a much livelier interest on this subject — that instead of one vineyard (without a competitor,) entered the present year, there may be found in 1865 a goodly number to contend for the promised awards. It need scarce be said, that in selecting a site for a vineyard in this latitude, a warm sunny exposure should always be secured. A spot somewhat elevated above the surrounding level, sloping a little to the south or south-east is the best. It should also be one not liable to be atfected by the early frost, otherwise the crop will be in danger of being cut off before coming to maturity. All cultivators of the vine agree that a light, dry, warm soil is the best. If it can be found, a soil com- posed of decaying calcareous rocks should be selected. This should be well worked to the depth of eighteen inches at least, and enriched with well decomposed manure to wliich should be added, (if not already contained in the soil,) some portion of lime and crushed bones — some wood ashes will also be beneficial, ■ especially in a dry season. If the ground is well prepared and VINEYARDS. 81 enriched at the outset, an annual top-dresshig will he all that will be required to keep the vineyard in a flourishing and healthy condition for two or three years. Although much has been written and said in regard to the best method for cultivating the grape, we apprehend, by a large part of the community, the subject is still very imperfectly understood. Any careful observer cannot fail to notice, that most of the vines planted in our gardens, and about our dwell- ings, have been suffered to retain all their native habits. Instead of being judiciously trimmed and properly trained, as they should be every year, they are permitted to grow unmolested, not only about the arbor or trellis provided for their accommo- dation, but if by chance a tree comes within their reach, they are allowed to stretch forth their tendrils to the nearest twigs, and thus find ample means to assist them in their rambles, and gratify all their roving propensities. All who suffer their vines thus to wander unmolested, have good reason to expect their crop will be a failure. Every grape-grower, whether on a larger or smaller scale, for the vineyard or garden, should have a suit- able trellis or arbor, beyond which the vine should never be suffered to climb. Late in autumn after the vine has shed its leaves, or in the early part of winter, it should be properly trimmed ; and, if so situated that it can be conveniently done, be taken from the trellis and laid on the ground to remain through the winter, with some slight covering to hold it in place. This is all the protection that will be required for the hardy varieties, to enable them to withstand the most severe winter. Early in the spring before the buds have become much swollen, they should be taken up and carefully arranged again on the trellis, there to be trained through the growing and fruiting season. For further reliable information in relation to this subject, see the very full and clear statement of Dr. Fisher. The committee have attended to the duty assigned them, by carefully examining the only vineyard presented, finding it highly satisfactory in regard to the location, general arrange- ment, and mode of cultivation, and in a flourishing and healthy condition. Cyrus Thurston, Chairman. 11 82 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. Statement of Dr. Jahez Fisher. The specific plantation of native grapes which I enter for premium, consists of sixty-one vines, set six feet apart and trained upon a single trellis. The whole number are Concords, and were planted in the summer of 1861, having been grown from single eyes, started in pots under glass the previous March. An under-drain was put in directly underneath where the vines were afterward set. The ditch was dug three feet deep, and the throat of the drain formed by placing flat stones like the two sides of a steep roof upon the bottom. Stones and rubbish were then filled in to within fifteen inches of the surface. Fresh bones, with the flesh attached, were spread liberally upon the rubbisli and the earth levelled. The soil is a strong, deep loam, on a somewhat retentive bottom, having a south-easterly slope. The row runs very nearly north and south, the vines being planted on the east side of the trellis about a foot distant, and leaning towards it. In the autumn of 1861, the vines were all cut down to within two or three buds of the ground and left without protection. In the spring of 1862 a trellis was built of posts and wire. The posts were chestnut, 2 by 2, except one at each end, which was 3 by 5, and braced in a foot. The posts were set ten feet apart, two and a half feet deep, and were dipped in gas tar before setting. I would now set them but six feet apart. Four strands of No. 12, annealed, iron wire were attached to the posts by staples made of the same wire. The lowest wire is 18 inches from the ground, and the others are placed at distances of 14 inches, so that the top wire is just five feet from the surface of the soil. These wires are coated with paraffine varnish to keep them from rusting. During the summer of 1862 a single shoot was trained perpendicularly from each vine, all other growth being rubbed off as soon as it started, and all laterals were pinched back to one leaf, and this operation was repeated and continued as long as they made new growth. In the autumn of 1862 the first vine at one end of the row was cut off at the third wire of the trellis. The second vine was cut at the first or bottom wire, the third vine at the third wire, the fourth at the first wire, and the remainder in the same way, alternating between the first and third wire. Any vine tliat had not made a good growth was again cut back again, as in 1861, VINEYARDS. ' 83 nearly to the ground. None of tlicra received any protection during tlie winter but remained attached to the trellis the same as during growth. In the summer of 18G3 a shoot was taken from each of the two upper buds, and trained horizontally along the first or third wirp as the case might be, in opposite direc- tions, each vine forming a T- No other growth was allowed, and the- laterals on these horizoiital shoots or arms were pinched back as they had previously been on the upright shoots the year before. These arms were allowed to bear one or two clusters of fruit each, according to their strength.- In the autumn of 1863 the arms were cut back, varying with their condition, but where they had grown vigorously, from two to four feet were left. Everything else was removed so that the vines showed nothing but a stick in the form of the letter J. No winter protection was used. The training during the past summer, 18G4, has been as follows : From each of the horizontal arms, upright shoots have been allowed to grow as often as every nine inches on the average, the intention being to have eight upright shoots or 'spurs upon each arm, when the latter shall have reached its full length of six feet. The shoots from the buds on the end of the arms, were trained horizontally for the purpose of extending them. As soon as the clusters of fruit- buds on the upright spurs were sufficiently developed to show their character, the end of the shoot was pinched off so as to leave but one leaf beyond the last good cluster, all small or imperfect ones being removed. If the spur showed no fruit, it was allowed to grow all the same, and was pinched at about the same length, or a little shorter. When these spurs had grown sufficiently, they were tied to the second or fourth wires, as they belonged to the lower or upper set of vines. The horizontal shoots from the end of the arms were allowed to grow imtil they had met the adjoining ones, and two or three joints beyond, at which point they were pinched off. It would be more correct to say that they were pinched off at seven feet from the upright stem of the vine. All laterals, wherever found, were succes- sively pinched off as often as they made a new growth, so as to leave but one additional leaf only each time. The vines have been pruned this autumn as follows : The horizontal shoot which is now the continuation of the arm, was cut off at five feet and about eight inches from the central stem. 84 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. Each upright spur is cut off so as to leave but two buds, not counting the undeveloped buds around the junction of the spur with the arm. The ground has all this time been cultivated with a horse-hoe, except the space between the trellis and the trunks of the vines, which is kept loose by the hand-hoe. To exhibit this mode of treatment in full, it will be necessary to give the proposed operations for one year more. The vines are to be laid upon the ground, before it freezes up perma- nently, and kept there by a little soil thrown upon them. Next spring, just before the buds start, they are to be tied to the trellis, and from the upright spurs, the upper bud will be allowed to grow and show fruit. If from any cause this bud fails to start, the lower one will take its place, but otherwise the latter will be rubbed off. One of the best of the base buds which were only partially developed the autumn previous, will be permitted to grow, while all the others are to be rubbed off. Both these shoots will be tied to the wire immediately above, and pinched off the same as the past season. That portion of the arm which grew the past summer, will form spurs precisely as the first portion has already done. In the autumn of 1865 the old upright spur, with the shoot that has grown from its top bud, bearing fruit, will be cut entirely away, leaving only the shoot that grows from the bud at the base, and that shoot, or spur as it will then be, will be cut back, leaving but two buds as before. The spurs on the end of the arm, are to be pruned in the same manner, and then the vine is fully established, the same course of pruning and training being followed out year after year. My reasons for adopting this method and its advantages over others, I will endeavor to give briefly. It is very well known that whoever plants a grape-vine in a fair soil, gets, the third, fourth or fifth year, one or two very fine crops, but after this time the fruit depreciates in size and quantity, and although the vine may be sufficiently vigorous, the crop seldom equals that of its earlier years. The reason I conceive to be this : When a vine is three or four years old it makes a growth of wood, vary- ing from two to ten or more feet in length on the different shoots. The best fruit buds are somewhere near the centre of these shoots. Everybody knows that it is common practice to prune grape-vines every winter, but without a thought of the VINEYARDS. 85 why, one cuts one way and one another. The usual plan is to employ in substance one of two modes. One consists in cutting out a portion of the long shoots or canes entirely, the' other in cutting off the greater length of all tlie canes. In the first case there will be a good show of fruit the following year, because a part of the best fruit-buds are left, but if the same system be followed out for a few years, the vine requires more and more room to spread itself in every direction. The best fruit is borne at a distance from the centre, and mostly at the top of the vine if any portion of it grows upright, and after a few years the parts of the vine nearest the root become barren, and the fruit is borne only at the extremities. This system must finally run out for want of room, and will not answer for vineyard cultivation. In the second plan above mentioned, if all the shoots are cut away for the most of their length, tlie best fruit buds are lost, and the result is necessarily a poor crop. The vine extends continually, but more slowly than in the other case and is otherwise less satisfactory. To overcome these difficulties, that is, to get strong fruit- buds, and at the same time to keep the vine always at home, I have adopted the plan described. I am not aware that anything connected witli it is original with me, for it has been in use essentially for many years. Its practical working is tliis : As the strength of a vine is expended principally at its extreme ends or top, the whole vine is made to be the top by the system of horizontal arms from which the upright fruit-bearing spurs grow, no one having any special advantage over another. The two arms being of equal length and bearing the same number of spurs are equally balanced. The effect of pinching off the ends of the bearing shoots early in their growtli, is to cause the remaining buds in the axils of the leaves, which are to produce fruit in the following year, to rapidly develop, and form fine, large fruit-buds. The continual pinching of laterals prevents the vine from neglecting these buds during the whole of the growing season. The same causes also operate to develop the fruit which is upon the same spur, and it grows very large and ripens evenly and early. Another effect produced is, that the leaves that are left. to grow, being few in number, grow very large and healthy. A single large leaf is of more value than a number 86 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. of small ones, and is more able to resist disease, and especially- premature decay. When we come to prune in the autumn, although we are obliged to cut away some very fine buds, yet the second one from the base of the spur is nearly or quite as good as any of those removed, and will give very fine clusters. Many of mine this year weighed upwards of thirteen ounces each. The principal advantage, even aljove all the others, is that the vine is always kept within a small com.pass, and is a perma- nent affair ; inasmuch as it will bear as much fruit, and carry as much foliage at five or six years, as at fifty or one hundred. I think that the special efforts of the grape-grower should always be directed to producing the buds for his future crop, the present one being already mostly beyond his control. I have not usually given the Concord any winter protection ; it is generally so well ripened and so hardy in its nature, as to endure ordinary winter weather without protection ; but in unfavorable seasons it is liable to be insufficiently ripened to withstand the influence of extreme cold without suffering, and in such cases there follows a partial or even a total failure of a crop. In fact, the winter of 1860-1, showing a tempera- ture of 22° below zero on the 8th day of February, killed all the wood which stood above the snow-line on that day. This might not have happened, and probably would not, if the wood had been well ripened in the autumn previous. The autumn of 1860 was very wet, and slightly cooler than the average of seasons, and the foliage of grape-vines and even apple-trees was killed by a severe freeze on the first day of October, while still green and growing. Vines planted in the way I have described, can be easily laid down at a cost of not more than one day's labor of a man and a boy for an acre, which is a very cheap insurance, considering the risk of so valuable a crop. My vines are planted on the east side of the trellis, a foot from it, and are trained in a slanting direction to the lower wire. Above that point they are carried up on the west side of the trellis, so that when pruned, and the ties cut, they fall toward the ground on the w.est side by their own weight. A boy can hold them down, while a man throws three or four shovelfuls of soil upon them to hold them in place. Although I have entered and described the vines traiped to a single trellis, yet it is in most respects like fifteen others iii the GRAIN CROPS. 87 same vineyard, except that about one-half of them are one year be^iind in the time of planting the vines. A portion of it was originally planted for other and different modes of training, all of which I became convinced must fail in the end. I therefore replanted with young vines, rather than attempt to retain the old ones, and removed the latter last autumn to give way to the former. In so doing, I sacrificed the prospect of a crop of some tons of grapes this year, feeling that the end justified the means, and that the longer I put off the sacrifice, the greater it would be. I think it. is an erroneous idea that a grape-vine necessarily requires a very rich soil for its successful culture. My vineyard has had no manure other than the bones before mentioned, for four or five years, and is now too rich for the Concord, which comprises ninety-five per cent, of my vines. Some of the slower-growing varieties require a considerably better soil. A soil too rich in fertility forces an enormous growth of wood, every shoot of which must be pinched back, thus vastly increas- ing the labor without any compensating result. If this pinching is neglected the succeeding crop will be more or less a failure. A rather poor soil is preferable for this reason, and if too much so to produce satisfactory growth, a top-dressing will be a sufficient means of obviating that difficulty. In view of these considerations, I would not trench or plough the land for a vineyard of Concord grapes more than twelve inches deep. I prefer that in this latitude, where the heat of the five growing months, from May 1st, to September 30th, averages only 64.11 degrees, that the great majority of the roots should lie near the surface. A dry bottom, however, either through natural or artificial drainage, is essential to tlie seasonable maturity of both wood and fruit. It may be proper to state that although the vineyard is now of four summers' growth, yet it was planted with vines one year younger than are ever purchased for that purpose. 88 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. GRAIN CROPS. WORCESTER NORTH. Statement, of Leivis A. Goodrich. Corn. — The soil on which I raised my corn offered for pre- mium, is clayey loam. It was in grass in 1863, and was manured with eighteen loads of barnyard manure, of thirty bushels to a load, two hundred pounds of plaster, and two hundred pounds of superphosphate. It was ploughed in November, 1863, and in spring for present crop, four to six inches deep, and harrowed one way, in May ; the cost of plough- ing and other preparation was |8 ; the manure cost 83, and was spread and harrowed in ; the plaster and phosphate cost $8, and were dropped in hills about three feet apart, and the corn dropped on that. The cost of seed 'and planting was $6. The cultivator was run through, and it was hoed twice, costing about $10. It was harvested from the 15th to the 20th of Sep- tember, by being cut and stooked in the field until dried ; the cost of harvesting and husking was $7. The whole cost is 869 for the acre. Amount of stover, four tons ; the weight on one acre was 4,440 pounds of shelled corn or 79|^f bushels. • Statement of Cyrus Kilburn. Winter Wheat. — I raised my wheat on a clayey loam soil, ploughed about seven inches deep. I applied only one barrel of superphosphate, and September 22d sowed two bushels of blue-stem winter wheat, and cradled it the last of July. The crop was injured by the Timothy grass sown with it. By repeated experiments I am convinced that no grass seed should be sown with winter wheat till the next spring ; the grass being more hardy will start first and check the wheat. I think this an important item in the successful cultivation of winter wheat. The amount of wheat was twenty-four bushels to the acre, and about one ton of straw. Cost of phosphate, .... " " ploughing, .... " " seed -and sowing, " " harvesting, .... $26 00 IT 00 5 00 8 00 6 00 GRAIN CROPS. 89 Statement of Alonzo P. Goodridge. Rye. — The soil on which I raised my spring rye was a sandy loam, on which in 1862 and 1863 I raised corn ; and was ploughed six inches deep, and rye sowed about the 1st of May ; one and one-fourth bushels of seed were used to the acre ; it was reaped 26th of July, and the acre yielded 1,600 pounds, being about 28|- bushels to the acre. Cost of ploughing, .... " " sowing, ..... & L/ (i> Vl K • • « • • • " " harvesting, .... $14 00 $3 00 3 00 2 00 6 00 NANTUCKET. . Statement of Charles W. Gardner. Corn. — Having entered as a competitor for the premium for the best experiment in raising Indian corn, I will say that the land is a sandy loam, that has been in grass for the last fifteen years, — last year produced about one-half ton to the acre. The piece contains about six acres ; but the worms have troubled a part of it so badly, that I will enter but three acres. Last February I commenced carting and spreading barn manure, composted with peat muck and soil, forty loads to the acre, each load containing twenty bushels. Ploughed the first of April, five inches deep ; planted from the 15th to the 21st of May, in hills three and one-half feet apart each way. My object in spreading the manure so early in the season is that it costs less, and that the manure gets more thoroughly mixed with the soil, and the after-crops are more even than when the manure is dropped in heaps and spread at ploughing. RESULT IN CROP. 385 bushels ears, worth 90 cents per bushel, . . $346 50 2^ tons top-stalks, worth $10 per ton, . . . 25 00 3 tons butts and husks, worth $6 per ton, . . 18 00 $389 50 12 90 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. COST OF CULTIVATIOK. Cost of manure, 120 loads, . $60 00 Ploughing, . 9 00 Seed and planting, 8 00 Cultivating twice. 4 00 Hoeing, 3 00 Interest on land, . 3 60 Cost of harvesting and husking. . 14 00 Net profit, 1101 60 $287 90 EOOTS AND VEGETABLES. MIDDLESEX. From the Report of the Committee on Vegetables. The ground that actuated your committee in their awards was this : asking ourselves what sized vegetables we should select for our own consumption, all, with one accord, said, the well-matured, medium-sized, — not too small, for there is too much work in preparing them for the table, — not too large, for they are coarse and woody, unfit for eating, and are not as salable in any market for culinary uses. This opinion is fully sustained by all market-men, and by the committee. Therefore the committee took into consideration this view of the subject: Does the awarding of premiums for monstrosities or freaks of nature tend in any way to promote agriculture ? The answer was, no. The question then arises : How can the desired end be promoted ? We answer in part by giving written statements in full, — of which too many are so meagre that they hardly come within the rules of the society, — of the kinds of soil on which they were raised, the kind and quality of manure as well as the quantity, and whether they are a fair sample of the crops exhibited, or selected from a field or the garden ; time of sowing, culture, distance between the plants, and the different varieties of vegetables best adapted for differ- ent soils. These questions, for questions they are in reality, if ROOTS AND VEGETABLES. 91 minutely and correctly answered, would do more good, in our opinion, tlian all the premiums ever paid by this society shice its formation for overgrown vegetables. J. B. Farmer, /or the Committee. NANTUCKET. Statement of David Folg-er. Beets. — After so much has been said and written upon root- crops, and especially the mangel, by those whose knowledge and experience ought to entitle them to credit, as one of the most important crops for a dairy-farm, there still exists a strong pre- judice against feeding them extensively. Knowing* that this prejudice has gained ground among us, leads me to extend my remarks beyond the limits of an ordinary statement of the results of a crop entered for premium. After eight years of experience in feeding mangels, I feel prepared to meet any objections against their extensive use as a succulent on all dairy farms, whether for the production of milk, or the manu- facture of that milk into butter. The milk is better and the butter sweeter and of a better color from their use than with- out. There is also a large saving in hay, for the cow that has eaten a half bushel of beets in the morning, will eat much less hay during the day. In fact, there is a large saving also, in the growth of this crop ; as the mangels grown upon one-fourth of an acre of land, will do more towards wintering stock, than the hay grown upon four times the breadth of land, the same amount of manure being used in both cases. There are many varieties of this family of beet, but after trying several, I give the yellow globe the preference, as I think it keeps better far into , the spring than any other. I do not think the yield so large as that of the long red, but have no doubt they contain more nutriment. They should be planted in rich, mellow soil, well manured, and thoroughly pulverized. Plenty of room should be given each plant, for I consider it more profitable and far preferable to raise large vegetables than small ones, and beets in particular do not do as well, if not carefully thinned early in the season. Tliey can be readily transplanted, and it is my practice to fill in all the spaces in this way. 92 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. My crop this year would have been larger had there been wet enough to transplant. As it was I had four hundred bushels, worth thirty cents per bushel, making $120, at a cost of 836.65. A few words in regard to feeding this vegetable. I think they should never be used before the 15th of January ; later would be better. Many farmers no doubt have been led to discard them from too early feeding. The seed was planted about the 1st of May, and the crop harvested the last week in October. Note. — There were several statements on roots returned to the societies, as for instance, at Nantucket and elsewhere, but the quantity of manure was not stated. Thirty loads of manure in Nantucket means nothing to speak of in Berkshire, and as the value of a statement depends mainly on the quantity of manure, it i* worthless with this item left out. Competitors should remember that the load is not a sealed measure. A cord is a load, and so is a bushel for a wheelbarrow ! MILCH C 0 WS. ESSEX. From the Report of the Committee. Dairy. — "We regard inquiry in relation to these two subjects, quantity of milk produced and the value of milk for butter, as of special importance to the farmers of this county. Every farmer may have an opinion as to the amount of milk his cows give in a year, and also how many quarts of that milk it will take for a pound of butter; but very few know from trial what their cows average, or what is the general quality of the milk. There is far too little knowledge of the cost of keeping our cows, and the best manner of keeping them, especially among those farmers who furnish milk for the market. The produc- tion of milk is fast becoming one of the leading agricultural interests of the county. The rise and increase of manufactur- ing cities and villages have created a large demand for milk ; and, as the population increases, the production of butter will » MILCH COWS. 93 become less and the quantity of milk raised for market greater. This change in dairy farming calls for a change in the kind of stock, and in its management. Cows that are profitable for butter, will, perhaps, hardly pay the expense of keeping at the ■wholesale price of milk ; and the reverse is equally true. We need careful and repeated experiments to show us what breed is best for our purpose^ and how cows should be kept to secure the largest return at the least outlay. In old butter- making times, but little butter was made in the winter, and the cows would thrive better that season on the hay* and other fodder produced by the farmer. But the milk-producer must keep his quantity of milk in winter nearly equal to that of summer; consequently he must bestow extra care, and must use considerable extra feed. The kind, quantity, and manner of using this extra feed is unsettled, and opinions among prac- tical farmers vary much. The only way to settle these matters . is by careful, patient experiment. And then how little is known of the amount of milk our cows produce. One man tells you cows generally do not average more than five quarts per day; another thinks a cow very poor if she will not average eiglit on like keeping. Perhaps it may not be out of place here to state the result of a trial made by the chairman of your committee a year or two since. . The object was to ascertain how much an average cow would give, on fair keeping, and how much difference there was between such a cow and the best. Accordingly three cows were selected which had been kept upon the place several seasons, and whose qualities were therefore known, and which calved, as nearly as possible, at the same time. No. 1 was a cow that had always been considered a fair milker ; No. 2 was one of the best, — both natives ; No. 3 was a grade Ayrshire. No. 1 calved April 12th, and the 22d of the next March. No. 2 calved April 25th, and the 19th of the next April. No. 3 calved June 10th. and the 21st of the next June. The milk was measured carefully every Wednesday, and the amount reckoned an average for the week. The following was the result : 94 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. MOKTHS. April, . May, . June, . July, . August, September, October, November, December, January, February, March, April, . May, . Total, Amount of Milk. Qts. Qts. 171 47 314 345 308 406 290 320 273 305 231 298 194 279 171 259 104 247 46 250 — 190 - 54 2,102 3,000 Qts. 345 427 395 334 357 296 310 326 295 270 169 41 3,565 QuAKTS PER Day. 101 9 lOi 96 10 9 8-2- Z3 I' 3. 18 13| 12| Hi Hi 07 10 lOA lOi 'J 52 Average amount per day during the whole time : No. 1, 6.2 ; No. 2, 8.5 ; No. 3, 9.4. The milk was sold at wholesale, and actually brought,— No. 1, I52.4T; No. 2, $79.71; No. 3, $97.57. The keeping in each case was precisely alike, and consisted of a few roots or shorts, with as much hay and other fodder as they would eat. During the summer months, nothing but good pasture. It was thought at the time that Cow No. 1 barely paid the cost of keeping and a fair interest on her market value. Taking this for granted, then No. 3 paid a profit over cost of keeping, sufficient to buy a good cow at that time. Dr. Loomis, in a paper published in the Patent Office Report of 1861, estimates the average annual amount of milk produced over a large extent of territory, at only 1,800 quarts per cow. If this is correct, or even if 2,100 quarts per year be the average, then it follows that many farmers are making milk at little or no profit. It also follows that with better stock, the same expense in keeping Avill yield a larger return than in almost any other branch of agriculture. Doubtless it is practically impossible for all to obtain extra cows : but when farmers are convinced that they cannot alTord to keep a medium cow, the demand for better stock will increase, and the supply will increase with the demand. Another important consideration is, MILCH COWS. 95 that every part of this county is so near a market that all kinds of fodder fit for cattle will always command their value in money. Hence there is no necessity for keeping stock to eat up our fodder as there is in towns farther back. The kind and amount of food most economical and suitable for milch cows during winter, is a matter scarcely less important to the milk producer than the kind of stock. The whole subject affords a wide field for investigation and experiment, and we hope that next year some of our farmers will observe and make note of what they are doing, not only for their own but the public good. Joseph S. Howe, for the Committee. MIDDLESEX. In making a report on herds of cattle, or milch cows, blood stock and kindred topics, certain great salient facts and promi- nent points ought to be repeated and insisted upon from year to year. The attention of cattle breeders and farmers cannot be too often called to them. Cattle, instead of bankrupting the soil, give back as much richness as they take from it. They afford the readiest means of keeping up the fertility of a farm, and generally a cattle district grows richer every day, while a grain district, without the introduction of foreign manures, at great cost, grows poorer. Here in Middlesex County cattle-breeding is receiving every year more and more attention, so that our soil, sterile as it is, compared with other portions of the country, is in no danger of exhaustion. Our herds, like our farms, are small, but by care- ful attention to breeding and by means of blood stock, our farmers can show cattle equal to the best. The great object with us is to convert grass into milk, and the cow that does this most effectually is the cow for the Middlesex farmer. It is computed that in this State fifty-two per cent, of the milk is consumed as food, while forty per cent, is manufactured into butter, and eight into cheese. In lliis county, doubtless, a larger per cent, of milk is consumed as food. After making all due allowances, milk as an article of consumption for food is of much more importance than its manufacture into cheese. Milk used as food must be produced near its place of consump- 96 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. tion. Few, even of those engaged in raising or feeding live stock, are aware of tlie enormous value of this source of the farmers' wealth and the proportion it bears to the other products of the soil. Suppose that by judicious selections, an infusion of better breeds and a more accurate knowledge of the principles and practice of breeding and feeding stock, we could add twenty per cent, to the profit of our animals in early maturity and in an increased product of milk, butter, or beef, we should have an annual additional value equal to that derived from an increased capital of six hundred millions. We, in New Eng- land, cannot raise such splendid herds as graze the blue-grass regions of the West. Our object is rather the production of milk ; the feeding of cattle for the pail, rather than the shambles, although beef here as elsewhere, is the ultimate end of cattle. It is now many years since our agriculturists have turned their attention to the improvement of the native cattle by cross- ing them with blood stock, and already the most happy results have been attained. This is evident from the better quality and earlier maturity of the stock sent to our great Eastern markets, from the cattle-raising districts of the West, to say nothing of the evidences of improvement nearer home. Our so-called natives spring from a mass of mongrel olood and ill-assorted races. With such an origin, of course they can possess no fixed hereditary traits, and no reliance can be placed upon them as breeders. Hence, the general introduction of blood stock among us constitutes a most important era in our agricultural history. We have every variety of climate, soil, and vegetable product, within the compass of our vast territory, which extends through twenty-five degrees of latitude and fifty- six of longitude, including nearly the whole temperate zone. Hence, every variety of cattle can be naturalized and made to flourish here. In New England, the Ayrshire and its grades seem best adapted to the soil and the wants of the people, which demand a liberal supply of [milk as an article of consumption for food. We have "crossed the Ayrshires with our native stock, with the happiest results, so far as our dairies are concerned. The small, fawn-like Jersey cow, of the Channel Islands, has been natural- ized here, and her milk, so rich in butyraceous particles, imparts MILCH COWS. 97 its golden hue to our butter. It is well understood that one or more of these Jersey cows should be present in every herd, at least where butter is one of the principal objects in view. In fact no breed seems to have sprung into greater favor within the last few years. Large herds of this breed of cattle arc still rare. Probably that exhibited by Mr. Hurd, of Concord, will vie in point of numbers and excellence with any other in the country. And in this connection the committee cannot but express a regret that the fine herd of Jerseys, belonging to Mr. Reed, of Tewksbury, were not on exhibition. .The committee also regret that they did not have the pleasure of seeing the fine herd of Ayrshires, belonging to George W. Lyman, Esq., of Waltham, as these two herds would have added greatly to the interest of the show. In this county,' the Ayrshire cow for milk, and the Jersey for butter, are exactly adapted to our scant pastures and climate. The Middlesex farmer, your committee are proud to say, houses his cattle, as a general rule, in the most sumptuous manner. Our barns are generally all that they should be, furnishing warm and comfortable shelter to the live stock in w^inter. In a r.eport on the subject of milch cows, (foreign breed,) wiiich the chairman of your committee had the honor to sub- mit to the Middlesex North Agricultural Society last year, he said : " The barns of New England form a most important fea- ture in their agriculture. Thousands are annually built on the most approved plan, for the storing of hay and other crops, and for the shelter of cattle and the saving of manure. In this Commonwealth alone, in 1860, there were 84,327 barns, an increase of more than ten thousand during the ten preceding years." Our farmers now generally treat their cattle in the matter of feed, shelter, &c., as they should be treated. They cannot own vast herds, like the stock-growers of the West ; their farms arc too small ; but their stock, though few in numbers, can be brought by careful breeding, to a high degree of perfection. As has been said, the production of milk is the great object with us, although, of course, it is desirable that our cows when given up as milkers should take on flesh readily. Mr. Flint, in his able and exhaustive work on the Milch Cow, has gathered and digested all the information extant in relation 13 98 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. to the dairy and dairy animals. This work has been most widely diffused, with the happiest results. It is a manual which should be in every farmer's possession. Peter LAWSON,/or Committee. Statement of C. W. Smith. I offer for the society's premium my herd of cattle, consisting of a bull, seven cows, and a heifer. The bull is Ayrshire. The cows and heifer are grades, with the exception of two natives. The grades are crossed with Devon, Durham, Ayrshire, and Dutch blood. Two of them I raised myself, one was raised in Lexing- ton, by Andrew Wellington, one in Concord from G. M. Bar- rett's stock, and the rest were raised in New Hampshire. Two of the herd are eight years old, two of them are six years old, two four years old, and one three. Their feed in winter has been swale hay and corn fodder, with about a peck of turnips, and from one to two quarts of cob meal per day. In summer they have common pasturing ; when the feed is very short, I give them one feed of green corn fodder or millet per day, but no grain of any kind. The quantity of milk given by each cow, soon after calving, is as follows : No. 1, 23 quarts per day ; No. 2, 19 quarts ; No. 3, 18 quarts ; No. 4, 18 quarts ; No. 5, 15 quarts ; No. 6, 14 quarts ; No. 7, (the heifer,) 12 quarts. The quality of their milk is above the average. "We churned three meals of their milk this week, and made at the rate of 45 pounds of very extra butter in seven days. Three of them have been in milk eight months ; two of them five months ; the others came in the present month. The profits of my dairy I cannot state very accurately. I have sold my milk for 30 cents per can of 8^ quarts. I claim that my cows are superior for quantity and quality of milk. Waltham, September 28. 18G4. Statc7nent of John C. Dillon. I offer for your award my herd of cattle, consisting of eight milch cows and heifers, one yearling heifer, and three heifer calves, viz. : MILCH COWS. 99 TABULAR STATEMExN'T. Where «1^ Us 55 Date Date Kame. Breed. Age. 1- :^ r,-' Kaised. 2?. of Trial. of Cnlvlng. 1. Duchess of Orleans, Waltham, i Ayrshire, 7 years, 201 15 June 10, May 10. 2. Susie, . Waltham, I Ayrshire, 5 years, 17: 14 May 15, April 15. 3. Minnehaha, . Wavland, 1 Ayrshire, 0 years. 18 14 May 23, April 23. 4. Clierry, . Wayland, 1 Ayrshire, 6 years. 17^ 13 June 6, May 6. 5. Jofey, . Weston, Mi.ted, !.5 years. 16 14 June 8, May 8. 6. Beauty, . Weston, i Ayrshire, 4 years, 17. m Sept. 1, '63, Aug. 14, '63. 7. Jenny, . Weston, 1 Ayrshire, .3 years, H; 10 June 10, Feb. 5. 8. Mary, . Concord, 1 Ayrshire , 3 years, 14 9 July 1, June 14. 9. *Belle, . . Weston, 1 Ayrshire, 15 mos. 20 dys. 1 Ayrshire, 5 mos. 5 dys. 1 Ayrshire, 4 mos. 10 dys. - - 10. tRose, . Weston, - - - - 11 JLady Constance, . Weston, - - - 12. § Daisy, . Weston, J Ayrshire, 4 mos. 12 dys. 1 " " "" * Belle is from Duchess, and was sired by Mr. Giles' premium seTen-eighths Ayrshire bull. t Rose is from SuRie, and was sired by the premium Ayrshire bull, " Zero." t Lady Constance is from Duchess, and was also sired by " Zero." § Daisy is from Jo.sey, and was sired by Mr. George Dunn's Ayrshire bull. At and preceding the date of trial, the cows have had only- fair pasture, and were kept in the barn at night. I must except Beauty, whose yield last fall is returned ; her feed was good pasture, with green corn at night, and a quart of Indian meal each morning. In reply to the fourth question : my cows' food in winter has consisted of English hay and corn-stalks while milking, and meadow and swale hay and barley straw while dry. This sum- mer they have had only a good and sweet, but rather over- stocked pasture, with a very little green corn fodder since the 24th of July. Last year each cow had a quart of corn meal every morning until she began to dry up, wiien by degrees the meal was discontinued. This season the cows have not had any grain, and owing to the oppressive drought, much of the fodder corn, on which I depended to help out their pasture, dried up, and was of little value ; and some younger corn which I was beginning to feed, was entirely cut down by a severe frost. In fact, the cows have, as their appearance will testify, had rather a hard time of it ; and their produce is only creditable when considered in reference to their keeping. As to my management and method of feeding : my attention is directed in the first place to keeping my stock at all times comfortable and contented. This, in summer, is usually a pretty easy task, and has consisted with me in furnishing them a good, fair pasture and an occasional change of bite, and in 100 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. providing a sufficiency of fodder corn to eke out tlieir pasture feed during the months of August and September. I bring the cows up at six, P. M., when they are milked and remain in the barn all night. I milk again at five, A. M., and then let the cows out for the day. There is a cellar under my barn into which the manure is dropped through scuttles, and from time to time I throw through these same scuttles, sandy loam, in the proportion of two loads of sand to one load of manure. On wet days in the fall, this is thrown over into the front of the cellar and thor- oughly mixed, and after standing a short time to drain, is drawn out and spread on my reclaimed meadow. The cellar jfloor is then covered about three inches deep with well seasoned peat muck, and receives the manure of the cows during the winter ; and also dry mud, as nearly as I can estimate, a load of mud to a load of manure. This last manure, when thrown over and thoroughly mixed, I spread broadcast and plough in in the spring, for planting ; and, used in this way, I consider the compost nearly, if not quite as valuable, load for load, as clear manure. About the time the fodder corn fails, the pumpkins begin to come in ; and with these, of which I give each cow about half a peck a day, and the after-grass on my mowing land, I keep my cows in good heart and milking condition till I take them into the barn for the winter. After this, being earlier or later in different seasons, my practice is to feed with good English hay, corn-stalks, and the remainder of the pumpkins and a few small potatoes, till about the middle of January, when I begin to dry up the cows which are to calve early in the spring. I have hitherto usually milked my cows till within a month or six weeks of their time of calving ; but from some experi- ments I have made, I am inclined to think it will be found more profitable to allow them a longer rest. At the same time I think it advisable to milk a heifer nearly up to the time of her having her second calf; believing that if allowed to go dry a long time the first season, she might wish a still longer rest afterwards ; whereas, if milked nearly up to her time of calving again, she will in subsequent pregnancies give milk a shorter or longer time, according to her food and treatment. In the winter I milk at six, A. M. ; then give a foddering of hay, (the poorest I am feeding ;) at about eight, I feed again, MILCH COWS. 101 and about nine, turn out to water, leaving them out a longer or shorter time, according to the state of the weather. I now clean out the barn and arrange the bedding. If the weather be cold, they will return as soon as they have drunk, when I give them another foddering, and while they are eating it I give them a gentle carding, and then leave them till three o'clock. I have heard some sneer at and others doubt the economy of the time spent in carding cattle. I believe it pays pecuniarily, and if I knew it did not, I should (if I could afford time,) con- tinue to do it, thinking myself amply rewarded for the trouble by the improved appearance of my stock, and the loving look I receive from each cow, as she stretches on tip-toe and curls her tail on her back at my approach. At three, I feed again, and at four, if the weather is not very inclement, again turn out to water and fix up the barn. When the cows return they find a nice mouthful in their cribs, and at six, are milked again, and afterwards receive a good supply of the poorer kind of fodder for their consideration during the night. If the weather be warm, the cows will frequently remain out the greater part of the day ; and, sometimes, on very cold days, I only let them out once, about noon ; in these cases their times of feeding are ' of course varied to meet the circurastaijces. Before feeding, I always clean out the cribs, throwing aside whatever may be left for litter, with which, either in tlie shape of refuse hay or sawdust, I keep them always moderately supplied. At intervals of a week or ten days, I give each cow a half peck to a peck of small potatoes raw, as an alterative, and every three or four days I give .each about an ounce of salt. Abovit a week before I expect each cow to calve, I put her at night into a good-sized, well-littered pen, but do not otherwise vary her treatment. Three days after calving I begin to give her better feed, and, if all be well, in five days I consider my milk factories in good working order, and supply them with materials accordingly. Tlio calves, if destined for the butcher, are allowed to suck the cows tiir tliey are sold ; if to be raised, I usually let them suck once, and afterwards feed them from the pail with new milk till they arc two weeks old, when, by degrees, skimmed milk is substituted for the new, and at about six weeks their allowance of milk is gradually lessened to about 102 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE., two quarts per day, which is continued to them till nearly the time for taking them into the barn. This is my usual system, and the one I prefer ; but this fall my milkman has been so pressing for all the milk I could spare, that I have rather stinted my calves, which have had nothing but pasture since the twenty-fourth of July. I cannot state the precise quantity of butter made from my cows in one week, as I have given my milkman the privilege (of which he has fully availed himself,) of using me as a reserve, and taking from one to ten cans a day, at a day's notice. The superior qualities I claim for my herd, are, a more than average yield of milk and butter, good, healthy constitutions, and kind and docile tempers ; and lastly, that they are well calculated, with judicious care in the selection of a bull, to pro- duce dairy stock, " native and to the manor born," and " adapted to the peculiaries of soil, climate and physical con- formations of Middlesex County." The sentences marked as quotations were appropriated as being peculiarly expressive, from Mr. Lawson's report in 1862, and from this and other writings of that gentleman ; and also from remarks of Messrs. Flint, Goodale and others. I have been led to think it may not only be interesting but profitable, to endeavor by judicious management aud without any unprofitable outlay, to assist in producing a Middlesex breed of cows equal to the world-renowned Ayrshire, Hereford, Durham and the Channel Islands. My theory, at starting, is a very old one, and is, simply, that a good milker, descended from a good milker, and sired by a pure-bred bull of a good milking stock, will, if put to a pure-bred bull of the same or another good milking race, produce calves of which the heifers will in all probability inherit the excellencies of their mother ; and that the longer any good qualities can be shown to have existed in both lines of ancestry without deviations, the more cer- tainty may we expect such qualities to be transmitted to each successive generation. Minor matters, such as color, size, form, horns, &c., are mere matters of fancy, and each will endeavor to please his own taste ; still, by degrees, opinions will become more unanimous, as the best cattle will, even in these matters, eventually set the fashion. I need scarcely add that my own judgment, — confirmed by the MILCH COWS. . 103 authorities I have quoted, — leads me to prefer the Ayrshire bull, as the most eligible cross for the production of dairy cattle suited to this section. I have sold from my cows since the fair last year, seven hun- dred and seventy-six pounds of butter, for two hundred and forty dollars and fifty-six cents ; eight hundred and thirty-five cans of milk, containing eighteen hundred gallons and one-half, for two hundred and forty-one dollars and fifty-three cents ; and four calves for twenty-seven dollars. I think I am quite within the mark in estimating the butter and milk used in my family at seventy dollars more, and I value the three calves I am raising at fifteen dollars each. The above Items, amounting together to six hundred and twenty-four dollars and nine cents, are all the precisely appreciable produce of my stock. Besides this must be considered the value of the skim-milk and butter- milk for the hogs, the manure for the land, and last, but not least, the pleasure I derive from witnessing the prosperity and comfort of my stock, and the gratitude and affection they evince in return for the attention I bestow on them. The greater part of the work about my cows in summer, and the whole in winter, — during four months of which I keep no help, — is performed by myself. Year by year, for the last five years, I have increased the number of my stock, in spite of my neighbors' indignant admo- nitions that I never should be able to keep them ; still, my cattle looked a little better than the average. I have always had hay to sell in the spring, and each year have had in tillage more land and sold more marketing than the preceding one. At last my secret was found out : " he half keeps them on grain." It was in vain for me to protest that I never gave a cow more than a quart of grain a day, or that I always sold more hay than would pay for their grain. I was condemned. I therefore determined, no less for my own satisfaction than for that of my neighbors, to try whether I really was dependent on my miller or not. In one sense, the experiment will be a most satisfactory one, as I certainly cannot be taunted with pecu- liarly good fortune in choice of a season, and my cows still live. At the same time, I do not feel inclined to continue my present treatment, believing, — with the approval of good author- ities,— that two cans of milk per day from one cow, are far lOi MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. more profitable than the same quantity from two ; and that ive cannot expect a cow to return us any more 7nilk or butter than we furnish her materials for. Weston, September 19, 1804. Statement of Joseph L. Hard. My cows in the winter were fed with fair English hay and cut feed, giving each cow two quarts of corn meal per day. The bulls received not over a quart per day. In summer the milch cows and bull " Don " have been fed principally on green fodder, southern corn and oats having been sown for that purpose. They have been allowed to run two hours in tlie pasture in the morning, and one hour in the evening. My feed, owing to the drouth, having given out, they have, at times, been kept out all day. The pastures suffering from the same cause, the cows have received four quarts of cob and corn meal per day. All my Jersey cattle are stabled every night, excepting " Prince Albert " and " Abraham," who are kept out all summer, excepting when brought in for a short time for some special reason. For quantity of milk, I have only tried "Victoria," "Nellie" and " Beauty," who, in full flow, average about eighteen quarts per day, the first giving eighteen and a half, and the others seventeen and three-quarters each. Quantity of butter I cannot state, but I claim that the cows exhibited by me give a very large quantity of exceedingly rich milk. The only known profit that I have yet derived from my herd is the pleasure that I have experienced in seeing them and exhibiting them to others. I expect, however, by next season to realise a profit from the sales of the stock, — offers that I have had for many of my animals justifying that expectation. Concord, September 22, 1864. Statement of George 31. Barrett., The herd of cattle that I offer for examination and premium, were all raised in Concord but one ; she, by Lyman, of Waltham. The herd consists of seven cows and a bull. MILCH COWS. 105 No. 1. — Breed, Ayrshire ; 7 years old, calved Oct. 1, 1863. No. 2. — Breed, Ayrshire ; 7 years old, calved Oct. 5, 18(33. No. 3. — Breed, Ayrshire ; 4 years old, calved April 5, 1864. No. 4. — Breed, Ayrshire ; 8 years old, calved Nov. 10, 1863. No. 5. — Breed, |f Ayrshire, ^L native ; 6 years old, calved March 10, 1864. No. 6. — Breed, ||- Ayrshire, J^ native ; 4 years old, calved April 8, 1864. No. 7. — Breed, native ; 6 years old, calved Oct. 8, 1863. No. 8. — Bull, breed, Ayrshire ; 4 years old, weight, 1,180 pounds. The four cows that are forward with calf, were wintered partly on meadow and partly English hay, with two quarts of shorts and one quart of peanut meal per day, and have run at pasture this summer. The other three were wintered on meadow hay, and have run at pasture this summer, with very short, dry feed. The bull has been kept most of the time on meadow hay, with a little meal about two months of the time, and has been worked. No. 1, gave last October, 20^ quarts per day ; 18 per cent, cream. No. 2, gave last October, 18 quarts per day; 13 per cent, cream. No. 3, gave last June, 19 quarts per day; 12 per cent, cream. No. 4, gave last November, 17|^ quarts per day ; 12 per cent, cream. No. 5, gave last June, 18 quarts per day ; 11 per cent, cream. No. 6, gave last June, 18 quarts per day; 11 per cent, cream. No. 7, gave last October, 19 quarts per day ; her milk was good ; the precise percentage of cream I do not know. I claim superiority for the quantity and quality of their milk. They were all raised by me, except No. 4 and No. 7 ; No. 4 was raised by Lyman, of Waltham, and No. 7, by Tuttle, of Concord. Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 7, were milked until July, and u 106 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. gave from eight to ten quarts, each, per day, in June. The other three are giving, two of them 10|, the other, 12 quarts per day, now. Concord, September 22, 1864. PLYMOUTH. From the Report of the Committee. The herd of Nahum Stetson, Esq., of Bridgewater, seven in number, (including those for exhibition,) were mainly blood- stock, and show conclusively that he has spared no pains for a series of years in perfecting his stock for the dairy. The herd of grade Jerseys of the Messrs. Pratt, of Middle- borough, were very fine cows. Three of this herd are from a very superior native cow, purchased at the auction sale of the Hon. Daniel Webster, crossed with the full-blood Jerseys. The other cow was three-fourths Jersey, from Mr. Hobart's imported stock. The milk from all these cows is very rich. The first premium for the best cow was awarded to Charles N. Martin, of West Bridgewater, grade Jersey, six years old, a most perfect model of a cow ; calved June 7th. From the 5th to 15th of September she gave 224 lbs. of milk, which produced 16^ lbs. of butter. She was fed on grass, and one quart of meal per day. We noticed two of the Kerry breed for exhibition by the Hon. Charles G. Davis. This breed of cattle are from Killarney District, south of Ireland. When a year old, they are turned out in large numbers on a common, a mountainous, barren region, comparatively, where they graze throughout the year; they remain there until nearly full grown, when they are collected and disposed of to drovers, are then driven north, and sold ; are a very hardy race, generally dark color, or black, and reputed to be great milkers. Seth Bryant, Esq., of East Bridgewater, presented a full- blooded Jersey for exhibition, sixteen years old, which he imported, and we have no doubt the cow has paid a greater income than any one in the county. The owner informed us that she had kept in better condition, and has done better the past season than she ever has. MILCH COWS. 107 Two-thirds of the dairy stock present were full-blood or grade Jerseys, showing that the public are being divested of whatever prejudices there may have been against that breed of cattle, at least, so far as to give them a trial, and we have yet to learn a single instance where there has been a trial of them for dairy purposes that has not been satisfactory. We are informed by Harrison Staples, Esq., of Lakeville, who received premiums on two full-blood Jersey cows, that, previous to purchasing them, he had three cows which were considered very good ; after he purchased the Jerseys they were all five milked together, and there was a decided improvement' in the butter made. A large part of the milk in the county is used for making butter ; hence the importance of introducing rich milkers. No FARMER OUGHT TO REST SATISFIED WITH A COMMON AVERAGE COW, BUT STRIVE FOR THE VERY BEST, having in vicw the purpose for which the milk is to be used. In purchasing, how often a few dollars extra would secure a valuable cow, which, if we obtained only a few additional quarts of milk daily, it would be net income over and above the annual expense of keeping ; or, instead of the penny wise, we should adopt the pound foolish operation, by paying a few dollars less, we obtain one which just pays for keeping. And we very much doubt if a majority of the cows in our county ever have paid their keeping. True, there may be good cows, which, owing to the scanty fare they have had, have not developed their milking qualities so as to show what they really are. In connection with the statements in regard to those cows which yield large quantities of milk, rich for the dairy, we have heard the question raised. How would they do in our compara- tively barren pastures ? By such questions we are reminded of what is said of the prospects of the hay crop, almost every season : " It will be very heavy on lands in good condition, but old meadows will be light." It would be a miracle if otherwise. So in reference to a cow if turned to a pasture where she would have to feed from morning until night, and a scanty allowance at that, if she should yield anything like a remunerative supply, of milk. 108 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. Whatever breed of cows we have, if they are great milkers, and kept in good condition, they must have an abundance of succulent food and roots — the higher the keeping the richer the milk, and better the health of the cow. Ephraim B. Thompson, Chairman. NANTUCKET. From the Report of the Committee. In the stock presented there were peculiarities which incline your committee to make some general observations. With three exceptions there was not a blood animal exhibited. Neither were there any cases of pure-bred cows. The cows were what are called natives. Of late years there has been improvement by crossing with Ayrshires, but we saw none that were above half-blood. To the mind of a person understanding the benefits of either pure breeds or a mixture of half-and-half of two pure breeds, as half Shorthorn and half Ayrshire, or half Alderney and half Shorthorn, these cows brought regret. As natives, they were very good. Some of them would produce as much milk, with the same feeding, as blood cows. But when you come to their progeny, how little you can rely upon it. The calf may take after a grandsire of the scrub race, or a kicking or otherwise worthless grandmother. This is why we hear continually from farmers the story of such and such a heifer being far less promising than the mother, and of the dis- appointment this result has occasioned. The progeny of native cows cannot be relied on. There is no certainty that they will follow in good points the dam. And here is just the precise difference between blood stock and that which has no pedigree. Now what should a farmer do in relation to procuring profit- able stock. In the first place we must remember that his milch cows are only so many machines to turn his grass into gold. Therefore there are certain things beyond the mere milking capacity which are important. When a cow has become too old to be profitable as a milker, it is then important to profitably prepare her for the butcher. There arc milch cows in Massa- chusetts which sell readily for slaughter, after they have ceased MILCH COWS. 109 to be profitable for the dairy, for more than a hundred dollars each. If these cows would fatten for thirty or forty dollars, — which they would, — then the breeders get sixty or seventy dollars clear on a cow, while the raisers of poor mongrel stock get nothing. So that the thriving farmer will look to milk first, and then to the capacity to take on flesh. A prudent merchant would pay but little for a ship that he could not at some future time repair and make valuable for some other business. So he who purchases a house looks to see if it can be repaired without costing more than it is worth. By what we have said, it will readily be perceived that your committee are in favor of blood stock for profit. The next question that arises is, " Among the various blood stock, which is best ? " We answer this by saying that each one exceeds the other under certain circumstances. The question then with us is. Which is best for poor, or at least, very ordinary pastures ? that is, in a few words, which is best for Nantucket ? With good feed, a very ordinary cow may be made a respect- able milker. With poor feed, the best cow will utterly fail. The farmer then should first look at his own means of feeding. The Shorthorn cow is heavy ; it is troublesome to her to travel ; she requires thick grass ; in fact, she wants to be " up to her knees in clover," and then she will pay most richly, both as a milker and for the butcher. But it would be the height of folly for a farmer, who has only poor pastures, to buy Shorthorns. The Ayrshires are lighter on tjie foot, more nimble, capable of enduring severer winters, and of recuperating readily in the spring. As milkers they produce a larger quantity of milk and butter, in proportion to the food they cat, than any other of the pure breeds. Like all other cows, natives as well as pure breeds, they will make poor things on starvation. These, how- ever, will be very good cows, and perhaps the very best, for the thin and meagre pasturage of Nantucket. The Jerseys have their peculiarities. For richness of milk, and the butter made from it, no pure breed can excel them. Some say that they require more tender care than the Ayrshires, but, to breed in with natives that are good milkers, a very superior cow would probabft/ be produced. We say "probably," 110 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. because no mongrel cow will certainly produce a good milker, however excellent the mother may be. Yet, to cross good- natives with any of the pure breeds, the chance of getting a good milker is increased more than fourfold. For poor pas- tures and hard winters, they are not equal, as is said by some breeders, to the Ayrshires. Other as reputable breeders, say that no cow exceeds the Jerseys in hardiness. A farmer, with a herd of Ayrshires, or Ayrshire grades, could not do better than to have a Jersey or two to color and flavor his milk and butter. For a private gentleman, the Jersey is far superior to any other cow. The Devon is not usually a good milker. The Devon, crossed with our native cow, would be good for a mere stock raiser. For working oxen and the shambles, they are very valuable. Their beef is excellent. No beef is sweeter, and none so well " mixed." But the best milkers, in proportion to their size and food, are grade Ayrshires. A cross obtained from an Ayrshire bull, and a puj:e-bred Shorthorn produces a stock that for beauty, for the milk-pail, and, at last, -to take on fat readily, would be hard to beat. It is a most excellent and profitable stock for Nantucket, if a farmer has good pasture lots for fall feed, and raises roots enough to mess them through the winter. A cow of this kind, owned by Isaac Macy, Esq., is the most beautiful animal in appearance, and the best milker of her age in the county. There are about fifteen thousand acres of poor pasture land in Nantucket, fenced and unfenced, exclusive of mowing lots. The climate is usually mild. From present indications farming has got to take the place of whaling in a very great degree. Ploughing the land, instead of ploughing the sea has yet to be very much the means of support. It becomes all, then, to look thus early to the improvement of their stock, so that Nantucket may soon be as famous for its excellent cattle and good blood, as the islands on the British coast, or the valleys of England or Scotland. We have said that care does much to make the cow. Milk is not, as the Scotch have it, all "made through the mouth;" good feeding is not all. To have your cows, whether natives or bloods, do tlieir best, there arc certain other requisites. 1st. They should have a warm barn. MILCH COWS. Ill 2d. That barn should be cleaned often. 3d. The cows should be fed regularly ; that is, at regular hours. 4th. They should be milked and managed with all gentleness. 5th. They should never be forced to remain out in the cold, or starve. 6th. They should be "curried" every morning. 7th. They shoiild be milked dry every time, and by a milker that milks quickly but tenderly. We will say a few words now in regard to selecting cows. They are meant to apply to native cows, as blood cows, or pure crosses, need no great selection. We only mean to allude to those marks easily found and readily seen ; marks which any careless farmer may observe. First, for Nantucket, the cow should not be over large. Her hinder quarters should be larger than her fore. She should have a large, soft bag. Her milk veins which come out of the bag, and lead along and go up into her belly about half way between her fore legs and hind ones, should be large, and the more zig-zag and knotted, the better. The whole cow should be in the shape of a wedge, her head and shoulders being thin, and the thickest part across the hips, looking over the back. It would be a good sign to have her wedge-shaped the other way, too ; her head being the point, and the very thickest part from the hip bones down to the bottom of the bag, or udder. Let her have a small head, a slim tail, a bright eye, and mild coun- tenance. As to the milk mirror of Gudnon, there is no doubt ; and to a person of sharp perception, and one who has looked at it and studied it carefully, it is a great guide. All good milkers have it large, and some poor milkers. These, however, may have been made poor milkers, by neglect in some way, or by disease. James Thompson, Esq., the president of the society, has pur- chased a small lot of Jersey cows, and a thoroughbred Jersey bull. Here is, perhaps, the only chance for pure-breeds, and as pure-breeds are so much more reliable for profit than natives, we hope every farmer will get as much of this stock as possible. These animals of the president's are from the very best Jersey stock, and as it will be impossible from so small a lot to get pure-bloods very fast, it is to be hoped every farmer will hurry 112 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. to get half-breeds, and commence " breeding in," as soon as possible. You can now have your choice between an Ayrshire and a Jersey bull, and if you have but a single cow, and she a native and a good milker, the quicker you raise a half Jersey or half Ayrshire calf, the sooner you will have a cow that not only will give more milk than the mother, but better milk also. There were a number of Galloway cows, or Buffalo cows, as they are called, and one took the premium as a milker. These cows have been generally good, but as they are of no particular breed, there is no use in any farmer breaking his neck to get the calf of one, however good she may be, for like all other mixed and bloodless stock, there is no certainty that the calf will in any way resemble its mother, except in lack of horns. We will close this somewhat extended report with a quotation from the report of the North Worcester committee of 1863: " It is true that thoroughbred animals are yet so scarce that all cannot avail themselves of the thoroughbred cows, but all or nearly all can use pure-bred bulls, and no man can afford to patronize a native, so-called, when he intends to rear his calves, and where the services of a pure-bred can be had for a reason- able advance from natives or grades. It will pay the farmer when he intends his calves for veal, as the increased weight with the form will generally insure a sufficient remuneration for the extra outlay. Before closing, lest any undervalue a pedigree, allow us to state that the value of a pedigree consists in its guarantee that the animal is of the race or breed claimed, and has in itself the power of transmitting the qualities for which it is itself noted, and that the longer the pedigree, the quality being the same, the more sure your animal is to transmit its qualities. As the object of all agricultural societies is to improve our agricultural interest, it becomes a question of importance whether we should offer j^remiums for grade or mongrel bulls at all, for, by so doing, we are encouraging the rearing of inferior animals." Edward M. Gardner, Chairman. HORSES. 113 . HORSES. W0RCE6TER WEST. From the Report of the Committee. In addition to the award of premiums I propose to give to the society my ideas of the breeds and classes of horses most deserving attention and encouragement in Massachusetts, and what is the best mode of rearing them. In doing -this I do not expect to meet the views of the members of this society or of other societies that are engaged in raising to any great extent, as all have their favorite breeds ; neither do I expect to give you a particular description or history of all.the valuable breeds of horses in New England, — there is no animal on which there is more difference of opinion than on the horse. The Morgan horse has been reared with success in Vermont, and to some extent in Massachusetts, and is a hardy animal. His constitution is well adapted to our climate. The Morgan combines all that seems necessary to make a good horse, being of medium size and powerful action, — a good feeder, — possessing docility of disposition, and maturing at an early age. I frequently hear an objection made against the Morgans that they lack in size ; that objection is easily obviated by crossing ; but when you have done that you do not have the Morgan horse. Then comes the question : do we get, by cross- ing, as good a horse as we do in the full-blood Morgan ? "JIVhat we gain in size do we not lose in symmetry, compactness, ease of motion, and vigor ? I think not, if crossed with the right breeds, although I think a larger horse than the medium size of the race of the animal is attended with a loss of power and action, and should not be permitted, except for special purposes, and with pure or full bloods. The Messenger horses have been reared quite extensively in Maine, and with great profit to many of the down-east farmers. The Messenger horse is much larger in size, — more rangy, but does not mature as young as the Morgan ; but when matured they are capable of great endurance, and are usually of good disposition. I have known many Morgans and Messengers that were fast trotters. 15 114 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. I am informed that the famous trotting stallion " General Knox," which created quite a sensation at the New England Fair, held in Springfield the present month, was a cross of" Messenger and Morgan, and I have no hesitancy in saying that I think him to be the finest trotting stallion I ever saw. . The Black Hawks are not second to any breed of horse reared in this country ; they make fine carriage and saddle horses, and for style and action are not surpassed. They are fine-limbed and active, good roadsters and fine drivers, but not well adapted for the farm, or draught. The Black Hawks are a branch, or originated from the family of the Morgan horses, and they partake largely of the vigor and action of the Morgans. The Hamiltonians have been raised with much success in Northern New Yo^-k, and have gained a good reputation, — I might say, become celebrated. It is enough to recommend them, that they are of the Messenger family, but they are not so much sought for in Massachusetts as either of the above-named breeds I have mentioned. The classes of horses to be considered, are, first, the stock horse ; second, the brood mare. First, the stock horse — like begets like, and a good stock horse is indispensable in propagat- ing good stock, and without him our efforts to raise good horses could not be crowned with miich success. Second, a brood mare is very important, and good mares should be used in breeding. It is too much the practice of farmers to put mares to breeding after they become broken down and are unfit to be used for general work. That is a great mistake, and should be corrected ; to raise a good colt the sire and dam should be of good symmetry, and the practice of using a sire much larger than the dam, so far as I have noticed, has not been attended with good results. They should be of nearly equal size, the sire a little the largest. By taking pains in propagating with the sire and dam, colts will be raised that will be of a profit to the farmer and a pleasure to look upon as they are growing to maturity. The family horse is almost one of the indispensables ; but very, few would be willing to be deprived of the services of this noble animal. A horse of this class should be trained to the saddle as well as the carriage, as he is hardly a family horse unless he can be used under the saddle. He should also be of HORSES. 115 docile disposition, and great care should be observed in select- ing a horse for this use, as he should be a good roadster, with fair speed, life, ambition, and be a good feeder, with a good dis- position, well broken ; all combined makes a good horse, and is most desirable and profitable. There are many other families of horses that I might speak of, such as the Indian Chiefs, Drews, Fox Horses, English Hunters, > J "5 3 iSl?(ljiiL^^j^:k;^l SHEEP HUSBANDRY. 127 ESSEX. From the Report of the Committee. It would seem needless, at the present price of moat and wool, for us to say anything to urge the farmers of Essex County to keep sheep. We are satisfied that all who have kept a flock as part of their stock are convinced that it is the best paying of their farming operations in dollars and cents ; and the profit does not stop here. Look over our pastures through the length and breadth of the State — bushy, rocky, uneven and hilly, most of them unfit for cultivation — and it would seem, by the constant cropping they have sustained, that they have nearly come to the end of their capacity to bear grass. In proof of this we see the woods are taking possession of them in all places remote from villages and dense populations. In the older cleared portions, where there has been but a small quantity of foreign manure applied, that is, manure not made on the farm, it has become necessary to give milch cows ground bones, or they become poor and stiff, and, in some instances, have lost the use of their limbs beyond remedy. ^ Many of the owners of these pastures have not the fertilizers on hand, and are not able to procure them in sufticient quanti- ties to make a permanent improvement on them. But we have the lands. What is the remedy ? Nature, eVer kind, ever faithful to herself, will restore them if we do not interfere, by a growth of wood ; and we believe that sheep kept in these pas- tures will do the same thing. The first process is a long one, beyond the lives of one, perhaps of two generations. The second is shorter, and the length will depend much on the manner in which the flock is kept. We are quite sure lands can be so restored, for the best of reasons, that we have seen instances where it has been done. We think that the quickest and most permanent method would be to stock the pastures fully with sheep, and to feed the flock in addition with grain or oil meal. If the pasture is fully stocked we are sure it will be certain death to most bushes and briars which infest it. The question whether coarse or fine wool sheep are best adapted to the county seems to be disputed, and it is probable ever will be, considering the diversity in our soil and the differ- ence in management of different individuals. It is contended 128 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. that the small. Merino, with its compact frame, is best adapted to our sterile pastures, that it returns a larger amount of finer wool for weight of carcase, and that it can be kept at less expense per pound than can the larger breeds. On the other hand, those who claim that the larger varieties are most profit- able, contend that they are most prolific, giving one hundred and fifty per cent, of lambs where the Merino will give but seventy-five — that they shear more wool, worth nearly as much per pound at the present time, and that the cost of keeping is but a trifle more for a coarse than for a fine wool sheep. But we will not go into a discussion of the merits of the different breeds. We hope that the farmers of Essex will try some kind as part of their stock, and will not only show us specimens of their flocks, but will also give us an account of their success, with details of their management, and their profit and loss, at the next show. Francis Dodge, Chairman. POULTRY. NORFOLK. A Prize Essay on the Breeding' and Management of Poultry. BY E. A. SAMUELS. It is now very generally admitted, both by experimenters and writers on the subject, that poultry husbandry, taking into account the amount of capital invested, and the labor required in its management, is one of the most profitable branches of farm industry. Constant experiment and careful observation, in various districts, have proved that at least one hundred per cent., usually one hundred and fifty, and, with judicious man- agement, two hundred per cent, may be realized as clear profit. Unfortunately, the importance of the subject has been but little appreciated among farmers generally ; and, although the annual production and consumption of poultry in the United States " probably exceeds $15,000,000," it is but recently that a regular system of management has been adopted, and the poultry-yard allowed a respectable position with the cattle-house and slieepfold. POULTRY. 129 The question, from which the greatest profits accrue, the rais- ing of poultry for market, or the sale of eggs, is still, I think, unsettled ; both systems have their earnest advocates, and strong arguments have been advanced, together with results of many experiments ; but I am inclined to think that a judicious union of the two branches can be made more profitable than a persistent adherence to cither. Of course, circumstances in this as in other callings, control results ; and there are many considerations to be taken into account before a decision can be arrived at ; for instance, what is the character of the country where the fowls are to be kept ; what are the facilities for trans- portation to market ; what amount of attention can be bestowed upon the flock. In an agricultural neighborhood, where food can be procured at producers' prices, (that is, if the poulterer does not raise his own food,) and where the fowls can have access to fields and pastures, at least twice a week ; where railroad transportation is convenient of access, (and certainly no Massachusetts farmer can complain on this score,) and where constant attention and care can be rendered, the raising of poultry for market will probably be found the most profitable. But in districts less agricultural in character', where food for the flock must be transported, often from considerable distances, and where only a limited amount of attention can be bestowed, the production of eggs will, undoubtedly, be the most remunerative. Gener- ally, however, as before remarked, the judicious combination of both systems will insure the greatest profit. The labor required in poultry husbandry is not necessarily expensive, for inferior farm hands, such as boys or women, as in Great Britain, can be employed. Farmers, in the harvesting of strawberries, pease, and other products, requiring light labor, do not hesitate to employ every available hand, and often at quite remunerative pay. Why cannot constant employment be given in the poultry yard to some of these lighter hands on the farm, at times when they are not needed in the field, where, if a judicious system is adopted, their labor may be very remunerative? Poultry husbandry is undoubtedly profitable binder almost all circumstances ; the object of the farmer is, therefore, to make it remunerative in the highest degree. He must obtain a flock of the best fowls, whether for breeding or laying, or both, and 17 130 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. adopt a system involving the least expense, both of labor and money. At the time when the " hen fever " raged so terribly in this country, a few years since, a great variety of breeds was intro- duced, some of which were undoubtedly valuable, but the most of them nearly worthless for general use. Undoubtedly, the mixtures of these breeds have been of great benefit to the com- mon stock of the country ; but we are in the days of Jerseys, Ayrshires, and Devons, and nothing but pure foreign breeds will do ; for in cattle husbandry, the result of careful breeding and culture is that the Ayrshire and Jersey are best for the Bolton Orats. Bred by S. & W. S. Allen, Vergemies, Vt. dairy, and the Devon and Durham for beef; so in poultry .hus- bandry, the most careful and accurate observation and experi- ment prove that the Black Spanish and Hamburg fowls are the best breeds for laying, and the Dorking, and, perhaps, the game fowls for breeding and the market. Of course there are many other good breeds ; for instance, the Polish Topknots, Spangled, Polish, Bolton Gray, Leghorn, Creeper, and Dominique ; but there arc objections to all these breeds, in some cases serious ones, far surpassing any peculiar to the others I have named. The different varieties of the Malay fowl — such as the Shanghai, POULTRY. 131 Cochin China, Chittagong, and Brahma Pootra, arc ahnost worthless, except as a cross with the common barnyard fowl ; for they are generally poor layers, clumsy, although persistent and indomitable sitters, and their flesh is coarse and ill-flavored. The farmer has therefore but four breeds to select from, if he wishes to arrive at the maximum degree of profit. These breeds have well-marked and infallible characteristics, all dif- ferent from each other to a certain extent, but uniting in the most desirable qualities. The Black Spanish fowl is certainly the most desirable breed we have, where a good layer and table fowl is desired. The full-blooded bird is of a jet black plumage, with reflections of greenish blue, and both sexes have very large, high-colored wat- tles and combs, and ivhite faces. The males are courageous, but attentive and kind to the females, who are most excellent layers, but poor sitters, and inconstant nurses. The flesh of these fowls is extremely delicate, white, and juicy. The eggs are of good size and excellent flavor. Together with these desirable qualities, this breed is easily reared and fed, (the birds being but small eaters,) and they reach maturity at an early period. Care must be taken in severely cold weather to protect them, as their large wattles and combs are easily frozen. The Hamburg fowl is another excellent laying breed, often being called the " Everlasting Layers." There are five varie- ties:— the Black, Golden Spangled, Golden Pencilled, Silver Spangled, and Silver Pencilled. These are all desirable breeds for laying, but the eggs are rather small, and the birds not so large for. the table as the Black Spanish, although of equally good flesh. The males are kind and attentive, and the females seldom desire to sit. This is the breed that Martin, in his Book on Poultry, wrote of, as follows : — " The hen betrays no disposi- tion to incubate, but continues to lay eggs, as if for no other purpose than to repay her keeper." This breed is not very hardy, but, in. a warm house, will lay throughout the winter. The Dorking fowl stands, unquestionably, at the head, where a breed for poultry is desired. Both sexes have usually a pure white plumage, sometimes gray or mottled ; their hind toes are doubled. The males are peaceable and attentive to the females. The hens are good layers, and excellent sitters and constant mothers. These fowls are very heavy. Their flesh is delicate 132 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. POULTRY. 133 and juicy, yielding an abundance of what is called " white meat," in consequence of their great depth of breast. The eggs arc large, and of delicious flavor. Perhaps, for general purposes, this breed is to be preferred, as in it are united the most desirable qualities. The game fowl is valuable as a stock fowl. The only great objection to it is its extreme pugnacity, on account of which the young are with difficulty reared, "sometimes a large part of the brood being killed or blinded " before they are half grown. The females are good layers and mothers ; and their eggs, though small, are deliciously flavored. The flesh of this breed is extremely delicate and fine grained, and in great repute. A cross of the breed with the Dorking is valuable for general purposes. Although poultry husbandry properly includes the manage- ment and breeding of several species of domesticated water- fowl, together with the turkey, Guinea fowl and other species more nearly allied to those already considered, I do not pro- pose, in the present paper to treat of them or their merits, but shall confine myself to those above mentioned. Accurate observation and experiment have proved that the maximum number of fowls in one flock should not exceed fifty. If more are kept, they should be divided into several flocks. The first necessary step then before selecting the poultry, is the preparation of houses and yards, each furnishing suitable accommodations for fifty fowls. In the preparation of these houses, economy, together with the best facilities for giving the the fowls greatest care with the least amount of labor, are objects always to be kept in view by the farmer. In selecting a site for a poultry house, a porous, sandy soil is the most suitable, and a south-east exposure should be chosen. If a brook or spring of pure water is accessible, and can be admitted into the yards, it will add not a little to the comfort and health of the fowls. The dimensions of the house need not exceed eighteen feet by ten, and the height eight feet at the back or north side of the house, and six feet at the south. This plan is most desirable, because the roof will be simple and sloping to the south, and there will be no waste of material or space. The material should be well-seasoned stock ; the frame may be made of three-inch joist and covered with one-inch boards ; the 134 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. roof and back should be shingled ; the rest of the joints should be battened. The sills of the building may be sunk two or three inches in the ground, but not more. I think that the experience of a majority of poulterers has been that a wall foundation for the poultry house, unless it is thoroughly cemented, is very undesirable, both on account of its harboring rats, weasels, and other vermin, and its being less comfortable in winter. The floor should never be made of boards, but of earth, which can be renewed, more or less frequently, at will, and the droppings of the fowls, rendering it the best of manure. Some recom- mend that a pile of saw-dust be kept near at hand, and a few shovelfuls thrown into the house daily. I think that loam and sods of green sward are better, because they not only absorb and retain the ammonia, but furnish amusement and acceptable picking for the fowls. There should be several large windows in the front of the building, which may be protected by laths. The entrance should be at one end. The interior should be divided into two apartments, one ten, the other eight feet in length, which may be separated by a partition of laths, with a door for passage through. These apartments are designed, the larger for roosting, and the other for laying places. The roosts are most conveniently placed in the form of a ladder, inclined to an angle of about forty-five degrees ; the lowest should not be more than three feet from the ground, for valua- ble fowls are often injured, sometimes fatally, by flying up and down from high roosts. There should be two tiers of nests in the laying apartment, one on each side of the passage to the roosting apartment ; and as secrecy is the great point the hens strive for in laying, the following is a very convenient plan for adjusting the nests. For entrances between the two apartments, have two small doors sufiiciently large for the passage of the fowls ; one at each end of the lath partition. The nests should be placed in rows, above each other, and accessible by hen ladders. They should be boarded up on the side next the main passage-way of the building, and separated 'from each other by board partitions. Small baskets are most suitable for nests, being easily removed and cleaned, in case lice or other vermin have taken up their quarters in them to the annoyance of the fowls. These baskets should have a liberal allowance of clean, short straw, or moss, POULTRY. 135 and in each a " nest egg " of wood, turned into the shape of an egg, and painted white. The boards, behind each row of nests, should be hung on hinges, for greater convenience in changing or preparing the nests, and for the removal of the eggs, which should always be soon after the fowls have gone to roost, in the evening. The poultry house and the fence (which should be about twelve feet high, made of laths,) around the yard being built, the next step is the choice of fowls. The female should not be less than one year, nor more than three years old. She should be nervous and noisy ; and, if intended for a breeder, of large body and wide wings. The male should be aboiit two years old, of perfect health, full bodied, broad chested, nervous and courageous, yet kind and attentive to the females. He is too old if more than three years of age. If the fiock is intended for breeding purposes, at least one male should be provided for every ten females ; but, if eggs are desired more than chickens, perhaps two cocks for fifty hens will be enough ; indeed, some poulterers affirm that they get more eggs from hens where no cock is kept than otherwise. Be this as it may, few cocks should be kept with laying hens, as their presence rather induces or stimulates their sitting propensities. The poultry-house prepared and the flock selected, the farmer should see that they have proper care and food ; that unhealthy fowls are restored or removed ; that those hens which incline to sit are provided with eggs ; and that the chickens when hatched are taken proper care of. Fowls in confinement require an abundance of pure water, ashes, to dust themselves in, and nourishing food. Of grain, equal parts each, of Indian corn and oats is very acceptable ; at least three times a week, scraps of meat should be thrown in to them, and a supply of crushed oyster shells or clam shells should be accessible at all times. Green sods also thrown frequently into the fowl-yard will be of great advantage. These few attentions are all that are necessary with laying hens. With fitting fowls, care should be taken that they are really in sitting heat. They often manifest a desire to sit, remain on the nest two or three days, and then abandon it altogether. This can be avoided by allowing them to sit several days, to test their constancy ; if they prove really in heat, ■ select fresh laid eggs of a sufficient number to be well covered — an odd number 136 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. is best, because the eggs will pack most regularly. In selecting these eggs, some persons believe that when the long, slim ones are taken, the chickens will be invariably males, and the thick, nearly round ones, females. This is a very uncertain plan to adopt in the choice of eggs, and ought never to be relied upon. The surest method seems to be, to select those eggs, if pullets are wanted, which when they are held between the eye and a lamp, discover the cavity at the great end of each egg to be at one side of the centre of it. If it is at the centre, the chick will be a male. The sitting hen should have her nest where she cannot be troubled by other fowls. Give her a retired, quiet place, and she will seldom want to leave her nest ; but if she is in the bustle of the poultry-house, she will be nervous and restless, and, oftentimes, will abandon her nest. There should be con- venient to her sitting place a box or pile of ashes, where she can dust and wash herself, plenty of food, and pure water. These are the only attentions she requires. The period of incubation is twenty-one days ; during this time the hen should be left to her own inclinations, and the eggs should not be touched or moved ; she carefully turns them that they may receive a uniform warmth, and any interference with her man- agement only irritates her, sometimes causing her to break the eggs, or leave them entirely. At the end of the twenty-first day, all the chickens should be hatched ; some, however, in consequence of great thickness and toughness of the shell, are unable to break it ; these may be assisted by carefully, with the point of a penknife, chipping away the shell where the little punctures are made by the chick. Great care, however, is necessary in doing this ; and, as a general thing, it should be avoided. The chickens require no food for twenty-four hours after being hatched. They may then be fed on a dough made of Indian meal and water ; this should not be too thin, as it is liable in that state to induce diarrhoea. If the weather is pleasant, the chickens may be put out in coops the second day after hatching. Those coops are most conveniently made in the following manner : take pieces of boards four feet in length, and make a platform three feet in width ; to the two sides of this platform nail other pieces of boards, which will meet together as a roof, over the middle of the bottom ; at the ends POULTRY. 137 nail laths, sufficiently wide apart to permit the chickens to pass through comfortably. This gives a dry, comfortable house, which, with care, may be made to last a number of years. These coops should not be placed very near each other, as the chickens are apt to wander into other houses than their own, when the hen will often injure them seriously for the intrusion. To place a number of these coops of chickens in the kitchen garden is one of the best methods of reducing those pests, the striped cucumber beetle, cut worm, and potato beetle. Before closing this paper, it is but proper that some men- tion should be made of the diseases of poultry. The most common are the pip, roup, diarrha3a, and gapes. The pip is mostly confined to young fowls. The symptoms are " a thickening of the membrane of the tongTie, especially towards the tip ; " this soon becomes sufficiently great to obstruct the breathing of the fowl so far as to cause gasping, and the beak is held open to assist breathing ; the chicken then soon pines away in solitude. This disease is caused by feeding upon hot food, and drinking impure water. Generally, if the end of the tongue is cut off, and a supply of pure water is kept by the fowl, a cure will be effected ; in obstinate cases the bird had better be killed. The symptoms of the roup are similar to the glanders in horses ; " constant gaping, dimness of sight, lividity of the eye-lids, and the total loss of sight, a discharge from the nostrils, that gradually becomes purulent and fetid." For treatment, place the fowl in a warm apartment and bathe the mouth, eyes and nostrils with a weak solution of chloride of lime and acetate of lead. The diarrhoea is caused by dampness and improper food. In the treatment of this disease, the food should be placed in a warm room, and some chalk and cayenne pepper be given in its food. The treatment for the gapes is sim- ilar to that for the pip, and the symptoms are nearly the same ; it is caused by the presence of numerous parasitic worms in the windpipe. These may be removed with a stiff feather. MIDDLESEX SOUTH. Statement of I. K. Fetch. In presenting my blood stock of Golden Pencilled Hamburgs for premium, I would respectfully submit the following state- 18 138 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. ment, and in addition would say, I have sold eight dozen of their eggs for eight dollars, which will make the profits of the fall as follows : ■ 472 eggs at 331 cts. per doz., the average store price, $13 11 Dr. for keeping, 3 74 Net profit, as common fund, . . . . . $9 35 Difference of eggs sold for $1 per doz., . . . 4 66 114 01 The hen in pen No. 2, we believe, has laid 150 eggs in the six months. In pen No. 3, 1 present for premium a pair of pure breed from my stock, which are the property of Charles Land- burn, the same being entered for him. Tliis pair of fowls has been enclosed in a coop twelve feet long and six feet wide, all of the time. The hen commenced to lay, on January 31st, and laid from that time to the 7th day of July, 119 eggs. The remainder of the six months she did not lay, but as you see, she laid her whole number in five months and eight days. She commenced to lay again, August 8th. Her keeping has been varied, but she has had the best of care, and I don't hesitate to say that 200 eggs a year can be had from each hen of this breed, if they have their health through the year. In my opinion, the above fowls are the best breed for eggs that has yet been presented to the public, and in giving the merits of the breed to the public, I submit the following state- ment of my four hens and a cock for six months : from March 10th to September 10th, 1864. The above fowls have been for most of the time enclosed in a yard, three rods long and one rod wide, and their food has been nothing but corn, with fresh water and oyster shells, at an expense of three dollars and seventy-five cents for the five fowls for the six months. The four hens have laid in the six months, 472 eggs, and one of the hens has been sick ten weeks of the time, being an average of 118 eggs to each hen ; but to give each hen her just merits, we should consider the hen that has been sick to lay about one-half as many eggs as each of the others, as she would not naturally lay as frequently, when layhig, as the others. Allowing her to lay 60 eggs, would leave 412 eggs to be laid by the three other POULTRY. 139 I hens — being 137 to each healthy hen. One of the three hens has laid, in our judgment, 150 eggs within the six months. From observation, we know that she has laid constantly, and more eggs than either of the others, therefore, I feel confident of the above. Their flesh is of a lighter shade than the Black Spanish, but as to its juiciness and flavor, I cannot say ; for I imported them in the spring of 1863 and have not as yet killed one, so I can#ot judge as yet of their merits for poultry. They seldom sit until three years old, my hens being now two years old, have not as yet shown any disposition to brood. Their color is of dark green and black ground, with feathers pencilled with golden reddish color, with rose combs and long sickle feathers, resembling the English Red Cap fowl. In submitting my blood stock of Brahma fowls for your con- sideration, I can only call your attention to my collection, as I have not this year taken the pains to ascertain the amount of eggs or chickens they have produced. I exhibit the original cock (stuffed) with three trio of progeny, being son, father, grand- father, and great-grandfather, which by comparison you can tell if the stock holds its own. For reports of the merits of the breeds you can consult previous reports of the society. I would call your attention to a brood of chickens exhibited by Isaac Felch, twelve weeks old to-day, (September 20th,) which have been allowed to get most of their living themselves, being put out in a lot away from the house and fed as inclination or cir- cumstances dictated. In my opinion, with Brahma and Chitta- gong fowls for poultry, and the Golden Pencilled Hamburg and the Leghorn fowls for eggs, no man need to look further for fowls which will be both profitable and a pleasure to keep. Statement of Samuel B. Bird. The fowls which I offer for premium are a mixture of the- White Leghorn and Common Native fowl, with the exception of five which are pure White Leghorns. I think a cross of the White Leghorn with our Native,' the most profitable fowl a farmer can keep. They are good layers, good size ; will weigh at five months old, six pounds a pair, are hardy and easily kept. Since January 1st, I have kept, on an average, fifteen fowls, all of them one year old last June. They have been allowed to run at large on the farm, and have been fed with corn, barley, 140 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. oats, and meat ; the chickens are fed on coarse meal, moistened, "until five or six weeks old ; then on corn and barley. I have set three hens on forty-one eggs, and raised thirty-three chickens ; they were hatched the first of June and are now three and a half months old. I have kept an exact account of the eggs sold and used in family, since January 1st, and also the cost of keeping. I reckon the eggs used the same as those sold at the same time. The sales have been of eggs : % 171 dozen, amounting to ... . 33 chickens, ...... Whole income, ...... The cost of keeping for the same has been : ' 4 bushels corn at $1.50, .... 4 bushels barley at 11.50, Oats, meal, meat, &c., ...'.. Whole cost, ....... Leaving a balance of $38.66 in my favor, or about $2.58 for each fowl. $45 26 9 90 155 16 $16 50 $6 00 6 00 4 50 FRUITS. MIDDLESEX. From the Report of the Committee on Class I. The increased value of land in the immediate vicinity of Boston, has caused and is yearly causing much of the orcharding to be cut down and give place for more profitable crops. This fact, however, will not lessen the value of those orchards more distant, and on land of less value. Apples. — That the apple crop will continue in most parts of the county to be profitable, there can be little doubt. Those farmers who follow the market have found the early and fall fruits to be the best paying, such as the Red Astrachan, Porter, Gravenstcin, William, and the like. These cannot, however, be recommended to those who do not frequent the market ; as FRUITS. 141 they do not ripen their fruits simultaneously, the crop cannot be gathered in large quantities. The common caterpillar was much more destructive the last season than for many years. On small trees, and perhaps on large trees, the best method to get rid of them is, to take the nests of eggs, as shown in the annexed cut, off either late in the fall or winter. This can be done after the fall of the leaves ; by looking carefully over the trees nearly all can be removed, and in much less time and much more surely than after the worms have hatched out. Besides, it can be done in a season of more leisure. J. CuMMiNGS, Jr., for the Committee. From the Report of the Committee in Class -11. Contrary to the expectations of many, the show of apples at our last annual fair proved, upon ocular demonstration, quite creditable to the society. Long continued east wind, while the trees were in blossom, caused much blight in some varieties at least. Later in the season, and when the remaining specimens which had escaped the blight were advancing in growth, we were visited by a severe and pinching drought, and a consequent, in part at least, visitation and almost Avholesale ravage of insects. From the period when the parents of the core-worms emerged from their cells, or cocoons, until their progeny had all found their way into the fruits on which eggs had been previously deposited, no rain fell to interfere with the mothers' operations by washing off eggs, or by drenching and beating to the ground the parents of the troublesome pest. The weather being quite warm at the time, the work of destruction was carried on with vigor, so that we had looked forward with the expectation of finding a large percentage of our apples wormy, and were not disappointed. 1\\ many instances, where a medium or large crop was expected early in the season, the harvest realized was rendered light and meagre by want of moisture in the soil to sustain it ; as a consequence, much ^ruit fell from the trees which was not punctured by worms. Notwithstanding the drawbacks upon the apple crop which have been named, the contributors to the show were out in as 142 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. large numbers as ever before, except, perhaps, in one or two instances, and the "specimens have not often been excelled. I think the lot of twenty varieties, presented by E. H. Warren, of Chelmsford, was fully equal to any previous exhibition made by him within my recollection. The same is true of an Acton gentleman's, whose name has slipped my mind. Some of the single dishes did not contain so large and fine specimens as has been witnessed of the same varieties before. For instance, the Williams and Porters were inferior to former displays ; while the Foundling, Lyscom, Hubbardston and others were remark- ably large and fine. From observations in my own orchard, prior to the day of exhibition at Concord, I had arrived at this conclusion, viz. : that some varieties of apples are more affected by drought than others. The past, season, while the Lyscom, Hubbardston and others, grew large, in no respect to any perceptible degree pinched by a lack of moisture, — the same being true of the Russet Sweet, the trees of which variety were quite full of 'large and fair speci- mens,— the Williams, Porter, and Roxbury Russet were far below, in point of size, what we have before witnessed. There are exceptional cases no doubt. That apples and pears or grapes and apples should be affected unlike, or in different degrees by drought, does not surprise me, while the difference in the same family does puzzle me a little. I trust there are persons who may be able to explain the phenomenon, but I am not. Another, and it may be, a more important question arises in the minds of fruit cultivators, which is this : how shall we, or how can we prevent the ravages of the core-worm and other pests which annoy us ? In my experience I have found it more easy to ask questions than to answer them. The practice of picking up apples and other fruits which fall prematurely from the trees, and feeding the same to swine or other animals, or treating in any way which shall destroy the worms therein con- tained has been, I think, wisely recommended as a means of ■diminishing the number ; yet, where the experiment has been tried, the results have not proved satisfactory to a degree that has stimulated the experimenters to renewed and persistent trials. Whole neighborhoods should take hold of the matter right earnestly, in order to arrive at favorable results. FRUITS. 143 Among the insect tribe, many are known to be night-flyers, bent on mischief. Moths will pitch pell-mell into a light, when presented to them in the blackness of night. The parent of the core-worm being a little grizzly moth, I move, therefore, that orchardists, next June or early in July, immediately after the above named night-flyers make their appearance, do make, or cause to be made, bonfires giving much light but little heat, at different points in their several orchards, on some dark, lowery evenings, keeping an eye to the same in order to ascertain results, and report the same at a subsequent time. I have tried the plan indicated, on a small scale, and seen the " varmints " go in. Asa Clement, for the Committee. MIDDLESEX SOUTH. From the Report of the Committee. Peaes. — The cultivation of the pear, until recently, was confined mainly to* those who did not cultivate it with any expectation of receiving a profitable return. Farmers who have covered many acres with apple-trees, have been satisfied with having one or two pear-trees on the farm, and have not even taken proper care of those, and if they did not bear good fruit have said there was no profit in raising pears. I,t has been thought that pear-trees would only grow and bear well near the sea-coast, but within a few years it has been shown that while they may do somewhat better near the sea than they do in the interior, they will do well anywhere in the State, if set in good, soil and taken care of, and they are nearly as hardy as apple- trees, and from the greater number of trees which can be set upon an acre of land, and from the greater price of fruit, that it is certainly as profitable for farmers to raise pears as apples. The dwarf has become a great favorite, and when set in a deep rich soil, it is sure to produce a good crop. There are some varieties of the pear which do much better and produce larger fruit upon the dwarf than upon standard trees. Those persons who have only a small garden can raise their own pears and have a variety by setting out dwarf trees. Standard trees will grow upon more gravelly soil than dwarf, 144 MASSA.CHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. but, of course, will do much better upon good soil. The dis- tance at which the trees should be set, is variously estimated. Ten by ten feet seems to be a good distance to set dwarf trees, which would give about four hundred and thirty trees to an acre. An orchard of five years' growth, ought, at least, to produce a peck of pears to a tree, and at ten years a half bushel to a tree, which, marketed at a fair rate, would yield a much greater profit than an acre set out with apple-trees, or planted with vegetables, and the expense of cultivation and marketing would be no greater. Standard trees should be set out, at least, fifteen by fifteen feet, and while it takes more time for them to grow to a bearing condition, when they do bear, the quantity of fruit obtained is greater than from dwarf trees. If a farmer desires to set out a pear orchard, a good way to do is to set standard trees twenty by twenty feet, and then set a dwarf tree between each ; the dwarfs will produce fruit almost immediately, and by the time the standard trees get to bearing, the dwarf trees will have died. Good quality of pears is of very great importance, which can be obtained by good variety and cultivation ; the trees should be set iif good soil, and the soil should be enriched every year ; the trees should be well trimmed, the ends of the branches should be cut back every year, and the trees should not be overloaded with fruit ; this is the most important of all, as nothing so much injures the flavor qf the pear as overbearing. Instead of propping up the tree and tying up the branches to stakes, thin out the fruit until the tree holds up its own branches, and the fruit that remains will be much larger, better flavored, and will bring a greater .price, and the trees will not be jnjured. Complaint is often made that a pear-tree, after having borne very full a few times, ceases to bear, and no doubt the reason was that it was overloaded with fruit, and the tree was injured. To obtain good crops of pears, enrich the soil, cut back the branches every year, and thin out the fruit. The show of pears at our exhibition this year was excellent, and it shows that the farmers and others of our society, are giving attention to the subject of pear culture. Your committee recommend that more premiums should be offered in this department, as the com- mittee found the sum of money at their disposal too small to recognize the claims of many exhibitors whose excellent speci- FRUITS. 145 mens were really entitled to notice. Your committee would also recommend that contributors of pears at our shows, who obtain premiums, should be required to ma^e a written state- ment of their manner of cultivation. This will increase the interest in this department of our exhibitions. Peaches. — There were several varieties of peaches on exhibi- tion this year, and your committee suggest that an effort be made to raise peaches, as we believe that the time is coming again when peaches will be raised in this State, and will be as healthy and profitable as formerly, as there are indications that the disease which has been so fatal to the trees has ceased to affect them, and if so, this fruit should receive the same degree of attention as in former years. Grapes. — The exhibition of grapes was very good, perhaps better than at any former show, but it was not so large, and there were not so many exhibitors as there should have been. Farmers are giving more attention to grape culture than formerly, and there is no reason why every one who owns land should not raise grapes, for the hardy varieties of native grapes, the Concord, Delaware and Hartford Prolific, will grow upon any land fit for cultivation, and the Concord, with very little care, will produce a good crop of fruit every year. Among the grapes exhibited was the St. Catherine, a native seedling, raised by Mr, James W. Clark, of Framingham, and which l^ids fair to be a great favorite. Your committee would recommend that the exhibitors of grapes who obtain premiums shall be required to make a written statement of their manner of cultivation, in order to furnish information to others as to the best method to pursue to obtain the largest yield. George L. Sawin, for the Committee. NORFOLK. A Prize Essay on Open Air Grape Culture. BT WILLIAM E. RICE, M. D. There is no fruit which will so richly repay the care and expense of its cultivation as the grape. By a judicious selection of varieties, it can be raised with profit in all parts of this State. By care to supply it with a favorable soil and exposure, and a 19 146 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. moderate expense for suitable manures, it will yield a large crop of delicious and noble fruit. If, on account of distance from market, or other reasons, it does not find a ready sale, it can be made into wine, with but little more care than is required to make good cider. In this State, there are thovisands of gravelly hill-sides inclining to the south south-west and west, which are now given up to shrubs and dwarf trees ; they might be reclaimed and made to yield an income of from $300 to |1,200 per acre, every year. Good, ripe grapes can be sold in Boston, in large quantities, at from eight to fifteen cents per pound. A cultivator of the vine, who has had large experience, told me, that with land worth fifty dollars per acre, it cost him five cents per pound (all expenses included) to raise Concord grapes. This was in the vicinity of Lowell. In three years from the time of planting, the vines commence to yi^ld ; if spur pruned, at that age, they will average four or five pounds to the vine. In the fourth year they will ripen ten or twelve pounds ; and after that, with good treatment, from fifteen to twenty pounds every year, for at least from thirty to fifty years. In Europe there are many vineyards that have been in culti- vation for more than a century. The fruit of the vine is con- sidered so healthy, that, in many parts of Europe, " grape cures " are established, where the sick are treated with a regu- lated diet, consisting, mainly of ripe and juicy grapes, and in many cases we are told, with the best results. The man who stands in a European vineyard looks upon the result of twenty centuries of culture and improvement ; for the original stock of the European wine grape (Vitis Vinifera) was a small, hard, and sour grape, brought from Syria. In the botanical garden of the city of Dijon, in France, there are six hundred varieties of grape-vine. It is unfortunate for the present generation, that the highly improved and saccharine grapes of Europe cannot be naturalized in this country and grown in the open air. All experiments in this direction, have failed, unless protection has been given either by means of glass or high walls. The foliage is thin and tender, and cannot resist the rapid and extreme changes of temperature incident to this climate. The vine becomes sickly, and at once falls a prey to mildew. We must follow the example of Europe, and grow our own vines from strong and hardy stocks to be found in our FRUITS. 147 woods. In them are the parents of a long line of noble descen- dants destined to ornament our hill-sides with purple and golden clusters, and to rival the luscious sweetness and rich perfume of European grapes. The intelligent skill of man has produced from bitter, sour, and worthless originals, all the noble and improved varieties of fruit which we have through seedlings. The same law has been, and must be, applied to the grape. Some thirty years ago, the only grapes generally known and sold from our nurseries, were the Catawba and Isabella. These are good where they will ripen thoroughly, which they rarely do in this State, our season not being long enough to ripen either wood or fruit. The Isabella originated in the South, and was introduced by Mrs. Isabella Gibbs. The Catawba was intro- duced by Major John Adlum, of Georgetown, D. C, and was adopted, and used in vineyard culture, by Nicholas Longworth, Esq., of Cincinnati, Ohio. Next came the Diana ; a seedling of the Catawba,, raised by. Mrs. Diana Crehore, of Milton, Mass. This grape ripens a week earlier than the above-named varieties. . Then came the Delaware, said to have originated in New Jer- sey, and introduced by A. Thompson, of Ohio. ' But to the intelligence and enterprise of a citizen of our own State we are indebted for the most valuable hardy grape for general culture yet introduced. I refer to the Concord grape, produced by the Hon. E. W. Bull, of Concord, Mass. Not only has the Concord been a direct benefit to us, but its success has stimulated others to work in the same direction, and new and improved varieties are rapidly succeeding each other. We have positive evidence that all parts of this country are adapted to the cultivation of the vine, in the numerous varieties of the wild grape, which overrun the States, from Maine to Florida. I think it may be safely assumed, that we shall succeed in obtaining varieties best adapted to each part of the Union, by improving upon the wild type of adjoining woods ; i. e., by planting seeds of the earliest, sweetest and best wild grape, in highly enriched and mellow soil. When the vines fruit, select the seeds of those which have improved most, and plant theni ; and so on, to any extent. In this way was the Concord produced in two generations from the wild Vitis Labrusca of the woods. Seedlings have since been produced from the Concord superior to the parent. Soil and situation modify all young seedlings, and great variations in 148 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. color, flavor, and period of ripening, are produced. This is an extension of the theory which Van Mons applied to the pear. Mr. Bull advises us not to go back to the wild type, but to plant the seed of the best varieties now in cultivation. This will save time, though the seedlings frequently sport and return to the rankest of wild forms. Soil, Situation, and Aspect. — The best soil for the grape is one that is light, warm, and moderately rich, also sufficiently porous to let air, heat, and water pass freely through it. Rich soils, loaded with manure, encourage the growth of wood at the expense of fruit. In this State, the best soil for the vine is sandy loam, from ten to fifteen inches deep, with an open or well-drained subsoil. The best soils are those which are com- posed of crumbling limestone, granite, or volcanic rocks. Some of the finest vineyards in Europe are planted in soil composed mostly of carbonate and sulphate of lime, (chalk and gypsum.) But the most successful vineyards, both- in Europe and Cali- fornia, are planted in a red, sandy clay, and in such soils vine- yards are commonly planted. Most writers on the grape advise deep trenching, and the preparation of a soil from eighteen inches to three feet in depth. There is no doubt that ihis tends to prolong the vigor and life of the vine in a warm climate, but as the ripening of the wood and fruit depend a great deal upon the heat applied to the roots, they should be kept near the sur- face in all northern countries, where the season is too short to heat the earth to the depth of two or three feet. To prevent damage from drouth, the ground may be mulched, with any cheap material, in hot and dry summers. Even the most unpromising, gravelly or sandy land can, by a judicious mixture of either muck, pond mud, or leaf mould, with clay and man- ure, be rendered extremely fertile. These materials may be carted on to the land in the mild days of winter, and worked in the next spring. In Europe they sow lupines, (a kind of bean,) or clover, and plough them in when in flower ; and the next year, they plant the vines. Grapes will grow in almost any kind of soil, from nearly pure clay to nearly pure sand ; but a mixture of the two with a little vegetable mould will be the most successful. Put clay upon sandy land, and sand upon clayey land. The vine cannot bear stagnant water about the roots, but loves to ramble in dry, open soil. If the soil is not FRUITS. 149 dry, build stone drains. Level ground will answer ; but the sweetest grapes and finest wines are always grown on the hill- sides. The heat that is absorlied and radiated from the ground does more to ripen grapes than the direct rays of the sun ; and, on the hill-sides, the fruit has the advantage of this heat. The best exposure is south south-west, and west and south-east, in the order given. Least favorable, east north-east and north. The vine should not be shaded directly, either by trees or Ijuild- ings ; though it is a great advantage to have protection against north and north-east winds. In a small vineyard, this may be given by a ten-foot fence ; in a large oije, by a double belt of evergreen trees, planted in a semi-circle. Whatever soil is used, it should be well ploughed to the depth of one foot before planting the vines. Manures. — The requirements of the vine are few and simple. Stimulating manures, applied to the vines, produce a rampant growth of leaves and wood, but no fruit. It is the same with the strawberry. Use, in moderate quantities only, mineral manures, and old, well-rotted compost. The best compost is made by mixing and heaping up grass-sods, fresh manure, muck or leaves, with a little ashes and gypsum, adding bones, when they are to be had. Turn the heap over occasionally, and when it is reduced to a uniform rich mould, it is in a fit state to nourish the vine. Cow manure will improve a sandy soil, and horse manure a strong clay soil. In France and Germany, manure mixed with fresh earth is annually carried on the backs of laborers and placed around the vines ; the old soil having been previously removed to the depth of six inches. They also dig in the prunings of the vine, — a rational and most excellent practice. Their soil has been exhausted by centuries of the same cultivation, while ours is virgin to the vine, and does not require such treatment. Mr. Bull recom- mends " ploughing the land to the depth of nine inches, and the first year apply thirty or forty loads of compost to the acre, to promote the formation of roots. After that, twenty bushels of bone-dust, twenty of wood-ashes and five of gypsum arc a sufficient dressing for an acre, for three years." Planting. — The best time, in this State, is spring, just before the buds begin to push, except in very dry and warm soils. Here it is better to plant in the fall, as soon as the leaves drop ; 150 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. then new roots shoot forth during warm days, and the vine makes a stronger growth in the ensuing year. Strong growing varieties, like Concord, Hartford Prolific and Diana, ought to be planted six feet apart in the rows, and the rows eight feet apart. The short-jointed varieties, like Delaware, six feet by six. Let the rows run north and south. The best plants, in my opinion, are well-rooted vines, one year old, raised from single eyes, and well supplied with fibrous roots. They are not so liable to be injured in taking them up ; they will make nearly or quite as good a growth the first season, and will come into bearing as soon as olc^r vines. In quantities, they cost much less. Mr. Bull prefers vines two years old, grown from cuttings in the open air. Either will make good vines. Dig a hole wide enough to allow the roots to spread out to their full length, and six or eight inches deep ; then make a conical heap of soil in the centre of the hole, sloping from four inches from the level surface of the ground to the full depth of the hole ; let the stem rest on the centre of this little mound, and spread out the roots in all directions, seeing that, none of them touch each other. Then fill in with mellow earth, shaking the vine gently to settle the earth among the roots. Then fill up the hole and press the earth down gently with the foot. It is a good plan to water the vines well, after planting, if the soil is dry. Keep the vineyard free from grass and weeds, and the soil open and loose. Nothing- should be allowed to grow in a vineyard except vines. Peuning and Teaining. — There are several modes of pruning ; but the principle at the foundation of them all is, to cut off the excess of the last year's wood, so that they will not overbear, and yet leave enough to secure the healthy expansion of the vine. Grapes are always produced on the young shoots of the current year. When set to poles, by the spur system, take stout bean- poles, (spruce or cedar are best,) char the lower ends, or paint them with coal-tar, and set them at least eighteen inches deep, one to each vine, leaving six feet out of the ground. Young- vines usually have three buds or eyes ; when they have gfown ten or twelve inches, tie up the strongest shoot to the pole, with l)ass-bark or straw, and pinch out the others at two leaves. Train the young shoot up perfectly straight, tying it to the pole every week. Laterals will grow from the axils of the leaves ; and when they have made three leaves, pinch them off at two- FRUITS. 151 In the first year thrifty vines will grow from six to ten feet. If they run up weakly and slender, pinch off the end of the main shoot occasionally, to check the flow of the sap and make the vine stouter. The object is to get ripe and strong wood, no matter how long it takes ; and, if possible, to get a brown, hard stem as high as the top of the stake at the end of the first year. In November, after the fall of the leaf, cut off all the laterals close to the main cane ; and, if that is slender or unripe, cut that back to three buds, and grow a single cane again the next year. If the cane is strong and ripe, cut it off at the top of the pole. Cut off all green wood at the fall pruning, as it will winter-kill if you do not. In the winter, or late fall, cut the vines loose from the stakes and let them lie upon the ground, so that they can move with the wind and shake off rain and ice. In the spring, tie them up again, and rub out every other eye on the cane ; or, in other words, leave buds enough to get shoots alter- nately, right and left, about nine inches apart, the lowest one fifteen to eighteen inches from the ground, the highest close to the top of the vine. These are spurs for the next year's crop. Keep them pinched in, so that they will not make over two feet each of ripe wood in the season, and cut off any fruit that may set, at once. Let the top shoot grow, without pinching, until September, when it may be broken off at the end. In Novem- ber, of the second year, cut every other spur back to one bud, and the intervening ones to three buds ; these will fruit the third year, and the single buds will make spurs for next year's bearing. In the month of November, of the third year, cut the spurs which have fruited back to a single bud, and prune the others to three buds, for next year's bearing. The vines are now established, and must be pruned in the same way during their life. Always let the top spur grow as long as it will ; this will prevent the pushing of the next year's fruit-buds duruig the current season, — an accident which is liable to occur from close summer pruning. Do not overlop the vines while they are young, a practice which has injured many fine vineyards. When the grapes have set, go through the vineyard and cut out bravely one-half of the bunches, or even two-thirds, leaving only the largest and finest clusters. The crop will ripen earlier, weigh more, and be much finer, if treated in this way. 152 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. The renewal system, with horizontal arms, for training against fences and buildings and trellises. First year. Train the same as in the spur system. In November, cut back to eighteen inches, or to the point where you wish to take the arms. Second year. Let all the buds push, and train the two upper shoots to a pole, or to the trellis, pinching them occasion- ally to make them stout. Pinch all the other shoots, at two leaves, and keep them so. This will promote the growth of the main cane, by arresting some of the sap, and thus prevent the vine from getting hide-bound. At the fall pruning, cut back the two canes to three or four feet each, according to the strength of the vine ; leaving the same length and the same number of buds to each. Then bend them down, one to the right and the other to the left, and tie them to the lower bar or wire of the trellis, so that the vine will be T shaped. Third year. Train up three or four shoots from each arm to the top of the trellis, at equal distances from each other. If some grow stronger than others, pinch in the strong ones till the weak overtake them. In other matters, treat the same as before. In November, cut back every other cane to one bud, and the intervening ones to three or four feet, for bearing the next year. Fourth year. In November, cut back the canes that have fruited to one bud, and the others to four feet. The spur system is the best for vineyards, and the renewal for houses and walls. In both systems, laterals must be pinched out at two leaves, and all suckers and shoots from dormailt eyes on the old wood, must be rubbed off. Trellises can be made of cedar posts, set eight or ten feet apart, and telegraph-wire or wooden slats run across, twelve or fifteen inches apart. Propagation. — Cuttings are the cheapest means of extending .an established vineyard. At the November pruning, save cut- tings of well-ripened wood, of the current year, twelve or .fifteen inches long; bury them in dry soil, or in sand, during the winter, and, in the spring, plant two of them in the place where you want a vine. Set them about two inches apart. In the spring of the second year, pull, or dig up tlie weakest vine, and set vines, one year old, in the places where the cuttings failed to grow. The upper buds of the cuttings may be cov- ered, one-third of an inch deep, after they are planted in a slanting position. If preferred, they can be set in nursery beds. FRUITS. 153 and transplanted, when one or two years old. If grown from cuttings in the vineyard, the roots are never disturbed, and, in dry soil, or stony hill-sides, they strike down deeper, and make stronger plants. The earth should be mulched with cheap litter of some kind, and the soil kept loose around the young vines. Train them to a pole till they are strong enough to be pruned according to a system. Layers can be obtained by bending down shoots that grow near the ground, and covering them with three or four inches of earth. Put them down in July or August, and cut the cane half through near the parent vine. By November, they will be well rooted, and can be transplanted. The most rapid way of supplying the loss of an old vine is to take a long and strong shoot from the nearest vine, and layer il;, in the place of the old one. It will bear the first year, and may be cut clear of its parent, in one or two years, according to its strength. The vines that produce the famous Burgundy wine of France, are renewed by layering every ten years. There are other modes of propagation, more expensive and difficult to manage. For those who desire to learn them, and, also, the principles of grape culture, I would recommend the " Grape Culturist," by Andrew S. Fuller, Brooklyn, New York, 1864, and " Grape Culture and Wine Making," by John Phin, New York, 1862. Either of these books can be ordered of any bookseller, at a moderate price. Grafting. — Grafting is done in the fall, to the best advantage. Cut off the old stock squarely, six inches under ground ; split it, for an inch or two, with a sharp knife ; cut a scion long, wedge-shaped, with two buds, and fit the inner bark of the scion and stock together ; tie with bass and fill the earth up to the level of the upper bud. Then invert a flower-pot over it, and bank up the earth, on the outside, to the level of the bottom of the pot ; then cover that with six inches of straw, and bank earth over the whole. In this way the scion is protected from frost, and can be uncovered in spring, without disturbing its union with the stock. This is Fuller's method. The scion starts early in spring and makes a strong growth ; frequently setting some fruit the first year. Grafts set in the spring often fail. Varieties. — While there are some twenty or thirty varieties before the public, there are only three or four that have proved 20 154 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. successful enough to warrant the recommendation of them for general vineyard culture, in this State. There are few grapes that combine the hardiness to resist our severe winters, the pro- lific fruitfulness to reward the cultivator, and the sweetness, richness, and high flavor which command the admiration of all lovers of good grapes. The Concord is a fine, large, black grape, with a beautiful blue bloom, and shouldered bunches often weighing a pound. Skin thin ; flesh moderately juicy, buttery, and sweet. Flavor good ; in my opinion, equal to the Isabella. It is the most hardy and strong-growing vine culti- vated in this State. It is the most profitable grape to grow for the market; for the public taste demands something large, black, and handsome, as well as sweet. The Hartford Prolific, originated in the garden of Mr. Steele, in Hartford, Conn. It is smaller than the Concord, and about as good. It ripens a week or two earlier, but is apt to fall from the bunch as soon as ripe. Market-men will not buy it on that account. The Crevel- ing originated in Pennsylvania. It is much like the Hartford, but does not fall from the bunches. None of these grapes have a spicy flavor or very delicate perfume ; those qualities do not belong to the Vitis Labrusca, in an eminent degree. The Diana is a lilac-colored grape, having a thick skin and somewhat tough pulp, with a delicious juice and musky perfume. It is apt to rot in rainy weather. In this State, it ripens unevenly ; part of the bunches remaining hard and green until frost cuts them off. It is a little too late for vineyard culture here, but will give satisfaction, if trained to the south side of a house or fence. The Delaware is a beautiful, amber grape, with a tinge of rose color. It is sweet, juicy, and melting, with a delicate flavor. The vine is hardy, and when fully established, prolific ; though there are many vines which produce more wood and fruit. In quality, it is not surpassed by any native. The medium or small size of its fruit is its only fault. It requires a riclier soil and more generous feeding than any other grape. When trained low and well ripened, it has made wine in all respects superior to Catawba, grown in the same locality the same year ; both grapes being perfectly ripe. Grapes for the garden and south walls, to be grown only where they can have winter pro- tection, are Allen's Hybrid, Rebecca, Union Village, Isabella, Diana ; new ones, on trial, Adirondac, lona, Israella, Rogers' BREAD. 155 Hybrids, Framingham Seedling, "Winchester. The Clinton is said to make good red wine, (claret,) but its growth is so rampant that it cannot be managed with profit in a vineyard. Diseases. — Mildew and rot are apt to attack vines when hot weather succeeds that which is cold and moist. Sudden and extreme changes of temperature seem to be the exciting cause. "Wet and clay soils are more subject to these diseases than such as are dry, sandy, and well drained. Mildew is a fungoid growth, which appears, first, on the under surface of the leaf, and rapidly creeps over it. It also attacks the berries, which then fail to ripen. The best remedy is sulphur, sprinkled on the leaves and earth among the vines. The rot attacks the berries in July ; they turn black or red in spots, and fall off. No remedy has been discovered for it. Final Advice. — Plant the Concord to sell as a market fruit. If you wish to raise only one variety, take that ; for it will flourish in poorer soil than any other. If you desire several varieties, plant Creveling and Hartford Prolific in small pro- portion ; though their ability to endure our hard winters has not been so well proved as that of the Concord and Delaware. If you wish to make wine, take a rich soil on the south or south- west side of a hill, and plant the Delaware. Excellent wine has also been made from the Concord. Late in the fall, cut the vines clear of the stakes and let them lie upon the ground, or cover them with earth. The increased certainty of a crop will pay for the expense. BREAD. ESSEX. From the Report of the Committee. From the specimens before us, we infer that there is a laudable ambition among the ladies of our county to excel in making bread; and this certainly is zeal in the right direction, for we consider poor bread one of the most unhealthy articles that can be put into the human stomach. We have seen bread on the table, hard, heavy, dark, waxy, and tough, colored green 156 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. throughout with saleratus. We never see persons making a feed (it cannot be a meal,) on such indigestible stuff but visions of dyspepsia, nightmare, and work for the dentist come up before us ; for it is now admitted by all that nothing destroys the enamel of teeth like saleratus taken into the stomach. Yet we have heard people who daily eat bread made green by saleratus, cursing the doctor, who, in a case of sickness years ago, gave them a dose of calomel, and destroyed their teeth. We once heard a lady, who took pride in her cooking, assert that to have good bread it must rise till it was thoroughly sour, then add saleratus till it was sweet ; that would make nice bread. It was suggested that it could be soured with cream of tartar. Ah ! no ; she knew better ; she wanted the natural sour. We could never imagine why people who use cream of tartar to sour their dough, do not buy sour flour as a matter of economy ; it can be bought less, and would save buying cream of tartar. We do not see why the same result could not be obtained. We wish every family in this country, (rebels included,) could have, daily, as good bread as the poorest specimen offered for our inspection, although we sup- pose, some persons, who have been used to eating bread of the brickbat sort, would not relish decent bread, because the taste gets so depraved they could not recognize good bread when they eat it. This ought not to be so ; for of all the various' kinds of ailment to which civilized man has had recourse during our historical period, none have been so universally employed as bread. Like most arts of primary importance, the invention' of bread undoubtedly long preceded its history, which is involved in the usual obscurity of early times. The Greeks ascribe the introduction of agriculture to Ceres, and the invention of bread to Pan ; but we know that the Chaldeans and Egyptians were acquainted with these arts at an earlier period. " And Abraham hastened into the tent to Sarah, and said, make ready quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it, and make cakes upon the hearth." There is reason to think, from some of the ancient writers, that the art of fermenting bread with yeast was known eighteen hundred years ago. Yet it was not common in Europe till within two hundred years. In 1688, BREAD. 157 the French government prohibited tlie use of yeast in making bread, under a severe penalty, in consequence of tlie repre- sentation of a college of physicians, who declared it to be injurious to health. But the superiority of yeast bread' soon became apparent; the decisions of the medical faculty were forgotten ; the laws were allowed to sink into oblivion, and the new mode of making bread soon found its way to other' countries. The primitive mode of making bread is still pre- served among the Arabs of the desert, who, as Niebuhr informs us, " lay cakes of dough in the coals, covering them with ashes till they are done, when they eat them warm." In the northern counties of England, in Scotland, and in Wales, unfermented bread is mostly used among the poorer classes. In Scotland it is baked in thin cakes, dried hard on racks, and kept for months. Not having been used to saleratus in their bread, the people there are able to operate on these cakes with their teeth, which the inhabitants of some localities we know would not be able to do. Unfermented bread may be flakey, but it is never porous or spongy. As a general rule, it is not so wholesome, not being so digestible as fermented bread ; but we believe, notwithstanding this, it would be better than the tough, clammy, sour, alkaline stuff which some people call fermented bread — and it is certainly time that every female, in our country at least, should know how to make good fermented bread ; and we know no easier way to impart this knowledge and scatter it broadcast among the people, than for our society to offer premiums, require a statement, have them published ; then those that run may read, and those that read may know how to make good bread. Then again, our society may become popular by these same exhibitions of bread. Some of the loaves offered for our inspection were very beautiful, and were made by an unmarried lady. Before we had finished our examination a young gentleman praised the bread very much, and said he would certainly visit the lady before he went home. Now, if this visit should result in mar- riage, or if any exhibition of bread hereafter should have such results, and nothing can be more probable, we may feel that where a man gets a good wife, or vice versa, they would be decided friends of the society. Edmund Smith, Cliairvian. 158 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. MIDDLESEX. From the Report of the Committee. The grains which we use for bread consist mostly of starch, gluten and sugar. The object of forming them into bread, is to effect such a change in them as shall render theni palatable and more easily digested. The grain i^ first pulverized and then sifted, to separate the different qualities of the meal. The external, or woody portion of the grain, is the bran. The inner part is the flour. The gluten is tougher and more difficult to grind. The finest and whitest portion, obtained by repeated sifting, consists of a larger proportion of starch. The darker colored part is richer in gluten, and as the nutritive properties are in proportion to the gluten, this portion makes the most nutritious bread. When flour is mixed with water, kneaded into dough and baked, it will be tough and clammy. If spread out into a thin sheet, it will be hard and horny. In neither case will it be palatable or easily digested. To avoid these results, and to form a light, spongy dough, different methods are adopted. If a paste of flour and water be permitted to stand some days in a warm place, it commences to putrify, and grows sour. If a small portion of this be incorporated into fresh dough, the decomposing gluten acts upon the sugar of the flour, and excites what is called the vinous fermentation, changing tlie sugar into alcohol and carbonic acid. The carbonic acid is set free in the form of minute bubbles of gas throughout the whole substance of the dough, and bein'g retained by the adhesive gluten, it causes the whole mass to swell or rise. These bubbles form the pores or small cavities which, in well-made bread, are small and uniform, but if the dough is too watery, or not well kneaded, or if. the flour is too fine, are sometimes large, irregular cavities or holes in the bread. If the fermentation is carried too far, the vinous fermentation passes into the acetous fermentation, and the alcoliol is changed into vinegar, and the dough becomes sour. This may be corrected by the addition of carbonate of soda or magnesia, whicli neutralizes the acid, forming an acetate of soda or magnesia, which gives no disagreeable taste, and acts as a gentle laxative, and is wholly unobjectionable. By fermentation BREAD. 159 the bread is made light at the expense of the sugar in the flour, which, as has been said, is changed into alcohol and carbonic acid, both of which are expelled by the process of baking. Any method by which a gas is set free throughout the whole mass, answers the purpose. If carbonate of soda is mixed with the flour, and muriatic acid, largely diluted,'be added, the acid and soda unite, forming common salt, and the carbonic acid previously combined with the soda, is set free, rapidly forming a very light sponge. This must be kneaded immediately, and forms a very palatable bread, containing nothing injurious. Carbonate of ammonia is often used in making cake. The carbonic acid and the ammonia are both driven off in the process of baking. The heat, in baking, causes the gluten and starch to form a chemical compound which cannot be separated by washing with water, as could be done when they were in the state of flour ; in consequence of this change, and of its light, spongy form, bread becomes easily soluble in the stomach. The water added to the flour, forms about a third of the weight of the bread. That which is not evaporated becomes converted into a solid, and forms a chemical union with the bread. Having thus spoken of the general principles of bread-making, we will close with a few remarks upon the bread which came under our notice. The examination of a large number of loaves on exhibition, satisfied your committee that genius achieves success in its own way. There were scarcely two specimens made in precisely the same way, and scarcely two that had precisely the same taste, and yet nearly every sample could be pronounced good bread ; indeed, we suppose that every loaf was considered superior by its maker, or it would not have been presented for a premium. It is truly surprising that so high a standard of excellence should have been reached, when we consider the difference in the quality of the flour and meal, the difference in the quality and quantity of the yeast, the difference in the quality and quantity of the milk, and even in the quantity and quality of the water used in the mixing ; for we believe the quality of the water may sensibly affect the character of the bread ; the dif- ference in the amount of the sugar, molasses, salt, and other ingredients used ; the difference in the degrees of heat to which 160 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. it was subjected, and the difference in the time occupied by baking. With all these differences, so much good judgment was employed, that the end aimed at, good bread, was in nearly every instance attained. The principal defects noticed by the committee, (and here the experience and nice discernment of the lady members were brought into requisition,) were the use of too much yeast, and in one or two instances, the use of too strong an infusion of hops in making the yeast, too much salt, baking the bread too quickly, or in an oven too hot, by which the surface was overdone while the interior was slack baked. In one or more loaves mixed chiefly with milk, the dough was left in a warm place to rise, and the milk became changed before the loaf was sufficiently light, giving to the bread the smell and taste of sour milk. This was the case with one loaf which presented to the eye a very beautiful appearance. Milk more than twelve hours old should not be used in mixing bread, unless soda or magnesia is used with it ; new milk is decidedly better. But the most common defect was the want of sufficient working or kneading of the dough. In the best sam- ples, the dough ivas subjected to a thorough working, both before and after rising. J. Reynolds, Chairman. DISTRIBUTION OF CATTLE. 161 DISTRIBUTION OF NEAT CATTLE IN THE UNITED STATES. WORCESTER SOUTH-EAST. From the remarks of the Secretary. The Census Reports for 1840, 1850, and 1860, furnish the data from whence certain " facts " have been eUminated. The first great law established is, that the ratio between the number of the people and the number of the neat cattle must always be the same, whether the population be ten millions or twenty mil- lions. This will be seen, when we consider that neat cattle are kept principally to supply the demand for beef, butter, cheese and milk. These articles being consumed wholly by the people, the demand becomes a constant quantity, and therefore, if supplied, the ratio must be constant. By the census of 1840, it was found that there were 87 neat cattle for every 100 inhab- itants ; by the census of 1850 there were 79 neat cattle for every 100 inhabitants ; and by the census of 1860, there were 81 neat cattle for every 100 inhabitants. Assuming that there should be 80 neat cattle for every 100 inhabitants, as being a near approximation to the truth, from the same statistics we learn that of these there must be 8 working oxen, 28 milch cows, and 44 other cattle. But without the discovery of another law these facts would be of small practical benefit ; we should not know where the demand for neat cattle existed, or from whence the demand could be supplied. The deficiencies or excesses only generally and vaguely known to exist somewhere, led to no practical solution of the difficulty. It was agreed that Massachusetts, to supply the demand for home consumption, had to purchase and transport for long distances, from beyond her borders, large quantities of beef, butter and cheese ; but just how much it required to satisfy the demands of her people, beyond home production, or from where the constant diminution of home supply was to be complemented in future, were problems which remained to be solved. The census of 1840, showed that Massachusetts had 38 21 162 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. neat cattle to every 100 inhabitants ; that of 1850, that she had 26 ; and that of 1860, that the number had diminished to 22, for every 100 inhabitants, instead of 80, which would be the number just sufficient for home consumption. The other great law established is, that cattle are moved to the eastward and capital to the ivestward, to supply the increasing demands of the deficient sections. The distribution of cattle in the United States, in 1840, divided into three classes, was as follows, viz. : — in that section of the United States east of Chesapeake Bay, the Potomac River, and the western boundary of Pennsylvania, there were less than 80 neat cattle to every 100 inhabitants. Tliis may be called the minmmm district. In the district composed of the States of Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia, Michigan, Iowa, Indiana, South Carolina, Wisconsin, and New Hampshire, there are from 80 to 100 neat cattle to every hundred inhabitants. This may be called the medium district. In the district including the remaining States there are more than 100 cattle to every 100 inhabitants. This may be called the maximum district. The general law of distribution is thus plainly shown, in 1840. Beginning on the eastern limit, cattle are found in small num- bers and go on constantly increasing, until we find the West has three times as many cattle as the East, the smallest ratio being in Rhode Island and Massachusetts, and the largest, nearly six times as great, being in Florida and Arkansas. During the next decade, ending in 1850, we find the bounda- ries of our three classes much changed. The western limit of the minimum class has moved far westward. Instead of the terminus of the Potomac and the Monongahela, its western boundary has been carried forward, so as to include North Car- olina, Virginia, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, Indiana, Kentucky, and Tennessee. In ten years the line of minimum production has made a westward advance of at least 500 miles. Alabama and New Hampshire now alone constitute the medium class. The maximum class, with the loss of Alabama, occupy the same area as in 1840, but those States east of the Mississippi DISTRIBUTION OF CATTLE. 163 have depreciated from an average of 145 per cent, in 1840, to 115 per cent, in 1850 ; while tliose west of that river have increased their ratio from 131 per cent, in 1840, to 159 per cent, in 1850. Texas stands at the head of the list, having 438 cattle to every 100 oi its inhabitants. During the decade, ending in 1860, the minimum class remains nearly the same. South Carolina, which had risen to the max- imum class in 1850, is included in this class, while Indiana has risen to the medium class, furnishing 87 per cent. The medium class now contains many States which in 1850, were allocated with the maximum class. Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, and New Hamp- shire, now contain from 80 to 100 per cent. During this decade, of all these States, Indiana alone has made an increase, rising from 72 to 87 per cent. The maximum class now numbers but two States east of the Mississippi — Florida and Vermont. The States of Texas, Ore- gon, California, Arkansas, and Kansas, Washington, Nebraska, and the other territories now compose this class. Thus we see the supply of cattle in the South-West is much larger than in the middle or eastern portion of tlie country ; and although the southern States are better supplied than the northern, still their future and main reliance must be on Texas. This accounts for the tenacity with which the rebels have held on to that State. From the facts above stated, the two general laws, are, we think, plainly shown. 1. That, taking all the States into the account, every 100 inhabitants require 80 neat cattle ; of which 8 must be working, oxen, 28 milch cows, and 44 other cattle. The fact that this ratio has not varied one per cent, for 30 years, settles the fact of its very close approximation to the truth. 2. That cattle are moving eastward, and capital ivestward^ But all general laws of this kind are subject to modifications by disturbing forces. In the present instance the cattle on the Pacific slope, as well as most of the cattle in Texas, should be excluded, in considering the question of demand and supply of individual States, for the reasons that the cattle west of the Rocky Mountains are isolated from the United States proper, and most of those in Texas are not sufficiently domesticated to be driven east in any great numbers. In discussing the ques- 164 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. tion of demand and supply, or the movement of neat cattle, Texas, and the section west of the Rocky Mountains, should be omitted. This done, we find the ratio between neat cattle and the pop- ulation as 68 to 100 ; that is, there will*be 68 cattle, to every 100 inhabitants. All those States, therefore, which have more than 68 cattle to every 100 inhabitants, have a surplus for export, while those having less than 68, have a deficiency to be provided for. The following tables are computed on the basis of 68 per cent, for local use, and will show where the excesses and deficiencies exist, and whence the movement of cattle must be to satisfy the demand. Table I. Showing the nuniber of cattle to each one hundred people in those States where there was an excess over the requisite number, sixty-eight, required for home consimiption and use, in the years 1840, 1850 and 1860 ; also the total number for exportation in each State. Number of cattle more than Total No. of required for liome use. cattle for ex- STATES. 1 portation in 1S4^0. 1850. 1S60. 1860. iFlorida, 149 231 206 289,275 Arkansas, 126 71 58 252,561 Vermont, . 67 44 47 148,096 l^ebraska, — — 32 9,228 Utah, - 43 32 12,887 Missouri, . . 45 48 30 354,603 Georgia, . 59 53 27 285,467 Mississippi, 98 53 22 174,087 Indiana, . 22 4 19 256,581 Illinois, 72 39 19 325,270 Alabama, . 45 26 13 125,346 New Hampshire, 29 16 13 42,389 Kansas, . - - 13 13,936 Iowa, 20 3 11 74,234 Louisiana, 40 43 5 35,400 Kentucky, 33 9 4 46,227 South Carolina, 28 48 4 28,148 Michigan, 19 1 3 22,473 Ohio, 12 1 2 46,790 North Carolina, 14 12 1 9,926 Total excess, » • - - - 2,552,934 DISTRIBUTION OF Cx\.TTLE. 165 Table II. Showing the number of cattle on hand and the deficiencies to each one hundred people in the several States, and also the total deficiency in each of the several States, in 18 GO. No. of cattle Additional STATES. on hand. No. required. Total deficiency. Minnesota, 68 _ _ Tennessee, 68 — — Wisconsin, . 66 2 15,517 Virginia, . 65 3 47,889 Maine, 59 9 56,545 Delaware, . 51 17 19,676 New York, 50 18 698,032 Connecticut, 48 20 92,029 Pennsylvania, 48 20 581,223 Dakotah, . 38 30 772 Maryland, . 37 31 212,985 New Jersey, 24 44 265,695 Rhode Island, 22 46 80,325 Massachusetts, 22 46 566,262 District of Columbia, 1 . 67 50,303 Total defi cienc_ y^ • - - 2,687,153 From these tables it will be seen, that, in New England, there is a deficiency, falling short of the use and consumption of its inhabitants, of 594,676 neat cattle, to be furnished from other quarters. In Massachusetts, 566,362 ; being more than in one- fifth of the total deficiency. In the Middle States, there is a deficiency of 1,564,526 ; in Maryland, 212,985, and which, added to the deficiency in New England, gives a total net deficit of 2,372,187 neat cattle in the States east of Ohio. From the tivo great facts — 1st, that the number of neat cattle, required for every 100 of the population, has not varied a single per cent, for the last thirty years ; and 2d — that the movement of cattle has constantly been ivestward, and that the deficit, east of Ohio, has been as constantly increasing, it is plainly to be seen that Massachusetts, with a deficit of over half a millibn, has a deep and vital interest in the practical questions involved in these astounding revelations. In peace as in war, the farther we are from our base of sup- plies the more they will cost. As the supply of neat cattle travels westward, the cost will be increased by the increased 166 MASSACHUSETTS AGRICULTURE. charges of transportation and the extra profits paid to middle men. The prime cost, for some years to come, at least, will also be largely increased by the short supply consequent upon the ravages of war, and the interruj)tion of agricultural operations in the rebel States. At the opening of the rebellion the south- western States were overstocked, but, at the present time, we cannot doubt that those States now fall far below the average number required for every 100 of its inhabitants, and, conse- quently, were there no interruption to transportation, would have none to export. For years to come, beef, butter, cheese and milk will command high prices, and especially in those sections where there is the greatest deficiency of these products. What will the farmers of Massachusetts do ? They must make up their minds to do one of two things. Either to sit down under the high prices that will rule for an indefinite period, or, by increasing their stock, enter into competition with the western stock raiser for the hoine market. No one, we think, can doubt that, while our State lacks 46 neat cattle to' supply the wants of every 100 of her inhabitants, it can be otherwise than profitable to enter into the business of cattle raising. It will be a long time, we fear, before beef and the products of the dairy will come down to the quotations of the prices current of three years ago. There is breadth enough of unclaimed swamps and abused pasture in Massachusetts, we believe, to support, and without detriment to its broad acres of tillage and grass land, all the cattle necessary to supply the wants of all its inhabitants. To accomplish this desirable, and, without any manner of doubt, profitable result, there must be more labor and more manure. With the great and increasing influx of a vigorous and hardy immigration, the farmer can supply himself with all the labor he needs, and by renewed and intelligent husbandry, increase the quantity and quality of his fertilizers to the full measure of his wants. We have little doubt that the discovery and verification of the two laws governing the " distribution and movement of cattle in the United States," will lead to a greatly improved condition of agriculture, especially in New England. INDEX TO THE ABSTEACT. Page. Agriculture and Art, address on, 1, 8, 17 Agriculture, the interests of, 20 Apples, reports on, 140, 141 Application of manures, 76 Ayrshires, qualities of, 96, 98, 99, 103, 109 Beets, 91 Bird, S. B., statement on poultry, 139 Boutwell, George S., remarks on sheep, 117 Bread, reports on, 155, 158 Cattle, training of, 39, 41 Cattle, breeding of, 95,97,102,110 Cattle, distribution of, 161, 164, 166 Corn, 57, 89 Cows, reports on, 92, 95, 98 Cranberries, 56, 57 Crops, table of, 01, 64 Dairy, 92,94 Davis, A. B., address by, 38 Derby farm, experiment of the, 45, 47 Diseases of poultry, 137 Dogs or Sheep, 124 Distribution of cattle in the United States, 161, 164, 166 Draining, 31 Education of the ox, 38, 39 Farms, reports on, 45, 47, 51, 55 Felch, I. K., statement on poultry, 137 Fisher, Dr. J., report on vineyards, 82, 87 Fruits, report on, 140, 141, 143 Goodwin, John A., address by, 20, 26, 28 Grain crops 88, 90 Grape, culture of the, 78, 82, 84 Grape, the Concord, 82, 86, 87 Horses, report on, 48, 113, 115 Insects, methods of destroying certain, 137, 141, 143 Industrial arts, 1 168 INDEX. Page. Jerseys, herds of, . . . . ' 104, 106, 109 Leonard, Spencer, Jr., statement of, . . ' 76 Manuring, means of, 22, 23, 59, 65 Manures, management of, 35, 48, 58, 65, 68, 76 Manures, experiments with, 59, 61, 65, 67, 09, 71, 77 Massachusetts Society's report, 58, 60 Milch cows, 92,95,98,104,105,106,108 " Natives," origin of the, 96 Ox, education of the, 38 Oxford Downs, introduction of, . . . . . . . . • . 119, 121 Pasture lands, renovation of, 125, 126 Pears, report on, 143 Plymouth, experiments on manures, 68, 71 Poultry, essay on, ■ . 128 Poultry house, 134 Poultry, statement of I. K. Felch, 137 Poultry, statement of S. B. Bird, 139 Roots and vegetables, 90 Roup in fowls, 137 Rye, 89 Samuels, E. A., essay on poultry, . 128 Seed beds, how formed, '49 Sewerage of towns, utilizing the, 16,17 Soil of New England, essay on, 29, 31 Sowing seed, time of, 49 Stock, improvement of, 96, 124 Stock, feeding of, 98, 99, 101, 103 Sheep husbandry, 117 Sheep, cost of keeping, 122, 123 Tobacco, culture of, 56 Thurston, C, report on vineyards, 78, 81 Vineyards, planting of, 78, 81, 82, 84 Vegetables, 90 • Ware, B. P., statement of, 65, 67 Ware, Darwin E., address by, 1 Wheat, winter, 88 Whip, best for use, 43 Works, George F., essay by, 29